UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

FORM 10-K 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

2017


Commission File Number: 1-10853

BB&T CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrantregistrant as specified in its Charter)

charter)
North Carolina56-0939887
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation)incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  

200 West Second Street

Winston-Salem, North Carolina

27101
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (336) 733-2000

(336) 733-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 

Securities Registered Pursuantregistered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Act:
Title of each class

Name of each exchange

on which registered

Common Stock, $5 par value

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares each representing 1/1,000th1,000th interest in a share of Series D Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares each representing 1/1,000th1,000th interest in a share of Series E Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares each representing 1/1,000th1,000th interest in a share of Series F Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares each representing 1/1,000th1,000th interest in a share of Series G Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares each representing 1/1,000th interest in a share of Series H Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  [X]ý   No  [  ]

¨

Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  [  ]¨   No  [X]

ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  [X]ý   No  [  ]

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  [X]ý   No  [  ]

¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by references in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    [X]

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”" "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and “smaller reporting company”"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerX  ý Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  [  ]¨   No  [X]

ý

At January 31, 2016,2018, the Company had 780,451,430778,291,454 shares of its Common Stock, $5 par value, outstanding. As of June 30, 2015,2017, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Company was approximately $29.4$36.5 billion.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s 2018 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K in response to Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III.
 

BB&T CORPORATION
Index
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Form 10-K
December 31, 2015
2017
  Page Nos.
PART I
Item 1Business3
Item 1ARisk Factors17
Item 1BUnresolved Staff Comments - (NoneComments-(None to be reported) 
Item 2Properties
Item 3Legal Proceedings (see Note 7,6, Note 1211 and Note 14)13)
Item 4Mine Safety Disclosures - (NotDisclosures-(Not applicable) 
PART II
Item 5Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities25
Item 6Selected Financial Data29
Item 7Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations30
Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (see Market Risk Management)66
Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
 Quarterly Financial Summary
 Quarterly Financial Summary75
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm81
 Consolidated Balance Sheets82
 Consolidated Statements of Income83
 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income84
 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity85
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows86
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
 Note 1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies87
 Note 2.Acquisitions and Divestitures Securities98
 Note 3.Securities Loans and ACL101
 Note 4.Loans Premises and ACLEquipment104
 Note 5.Premises and Equipment111
Note 6.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets111
 Note 7.6. Loan Servicing112
 Note 7. DepositsNote 8.114
 Note 8. Long-Term DebtNote 9.115
 Note 10.9. Shareholders' Equity117
 Note 10. AOCINote 11.119
 Note 12.11. Income Taxes120
 Note 13.12. Benefit Plans122
 Note 14.13. Commitments and Contingencies126
 Note 15.14. Regulatory Requirements and Other Restrictions128

 Note 16.15. Parent Company Financial Statements129
 Note 17.16. Fair Value Disclosures132
 Note 18.17. Derivative Financial Instruments138
 Note 19.18. Computation of EPS142
 Note 20.19. Operating Segments142
Item 9Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure - (NoneDisclosure-(None to be reported)
Item 9AControls and Procedures80
Item 9BOther Information - (NoneInformation-(None to be reported) 
PART III
Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance*
Item 11Executive Compensation*
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters*
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence*
Item 14Principal Accounting Fees and Services*
PART IV
Item 15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 
 Financial Statements - (seeStatements-(see Listing in Item 8 above) 
 Exhibits149
 Financial Statement Schedules - (NoneSchedules-(None required) 
Item 16Form 10-K Summary-(None) 



*For information regarding executive officers, refer to “Executive"Executive Officers of BB&T”&T" in Part I. The other information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings “Proposal"Proposal 1-Election of Directors,” “Corporate" "Corporate Governance Matters”Matters," "Corporate Governance Matters-Board Committees, Membership, Attendance and “SectionLead Director Responsibilities," "Audit Committee Report" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Compliance" in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Compensation of Directors” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

For information regarding the registrant’s securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, refer to “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Part II.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation of Executive Officers," "Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Compensation of Directors" in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
For information regarding the registrant’s securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, refer to "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in Part II. The other information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings “Stock"Stock Ownership Information” and “Compensation of Executive Officers”Information" in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings “Corporate Governance Matters” and “Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings “Fees to Auditors” and “Corporate Governance Matters” in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Corporate Governance Matters-Director Independence" and "Transactions with Executive Officers and Directors" in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Fees to Auditors" and "Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy" in the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Glossary of Defined Terms

The following terms may be used throughout this Report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Term Definition
20152017 Repurchase Plan Plan for the repurchase of up to 50 million shares$1.93 billion of BB&T’s common stock
2006 Repurchase PlanPlan for the repurchase of up to 50 million shares of BB&T’s&T's common stock
ACL Allowance for credit losses
Acquired from FDICAssets of Colonial Bank acquired from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation during 2009, which are currently covered or were formerly covered under loss sharing agreements
AFS Available-for-sale
Agency MBS Mortgage-backed securities issued by a U.S. government agency or GSE
ALLL Allowance for loan and lease losses
American Coastal American Coastal Insurance Company
AOCI Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Basel III Global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity published by the BCBS
BB&T BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries
BCBS Basel Committee on BankBanking Supervision
BHC Bank holding company
BHCA Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
Branch Bank Branch Banking and Trust Company
BUBSA/AML Business UnitBank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering
CB-CommercialCommunity Banking Commercial, an operating segment
CB-RetailCommunity Banking Retail and Consumer Finance, an operating segment
CCAR Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CD Certificate of deposit
CDI Core deposit intangible assets
CISACEO Cybersecurity Information Sharing ActChief Executive Officer
CET1Common equity Tier 1
CFPB Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CEOCISA Chief Executive Officer
CROChief Risk OfficerCybersecurity Information Sharing Act
CMO Collateralized mortgage obligation
Colonial Collectively, certain assets and liabilities of Colonial Bank acquired by BB&T in 2009
Company BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries (interchangeable with "BB&T" above)
CRA Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
CRE Commercial real estate
CRMC Credit Risk Management Committee
CROChief Risk Officer
CROC Compliance Risk Oversight Committee
DIF Deposit Insurance Fund administered by the FDIC
Directors’ PlanNon-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan
Dodd-Frank Act Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EITSCDOL Enterprise IT SteeringUnited States Department of Labor
DTSSRCData & Technology Services Strategy & Risk Committee
EPS Earnings per common share
ERPEnterprise resource planning
EVE Economic value of equity
Exchange Act Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FATCA Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA Federal Housing Administration
FHC Financial Holding Company
FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FINRA Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FTEFS&CF Fully taxable-equivalentFinancial Services and Commercial Finance, an operating segment
FTP Funds transfer pricing
GAAP Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
1

TermDefinition
GNMA Government National Mortgage Association
Grandbridge Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC
GSE U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
HFI Held for investment
HMDA Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
HTM Held-to-maturity
HUD-OIG Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

TermDefinition
IDI Insured depository institution
IMLAFAIH&PF International Money Laundering AbatementInsurance Holdings and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001Premium Finance, an operating segment
IPV Independent price verification
IRC Internal Revenue Code
IRS Internal Revenue Service
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
LCR Liquidity Coverage Ratio
LHFS Loans held for sale
LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate
MBS Mortgage-backed securities
MRLCC Market Risk, Liquidity and Capital Committee
MRMModel Risk Management
MSR Mortgage servicing right
MSRB Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
N/ANot applicable
National PennNational Penn Bancshares, Inc., previously a Pennsylvania incorporated BHC, acquired April 1, 2016
NCCOBNorth Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks
NIM Net interest margin, computed on a taxable-equivalent basis
NMNot meaningful
NPA Nonperforming asset
NPL Nonperforming loan
NSFRNet stable value funding ratio
NYSE NYSE Euronext, Inc.
OAS Option adjusted spread
OCI Other comprehensive income (loss)
OFACU.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control
OREO Other real estate owned
ORMC Operational Risk Management Committee
OT&COther, Treasury and Corporate
OTTI Other-than-temporary impairment
Parent Company BB&T Corporation, the parent company of Branch Bank and other subsidiaries
Patriot Act Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
PCI Purchased credit impaired loans as well as assets of Colonial Bank acquired from the FDIC during 2009, which are currently covered or were formerly covered under loss sharing agreements
Peer GroupPSU Financial holding companies included in the industry peer group indexPerformance share units
Re-REMICsRe-securitizations of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits
RMC Risk Management Committee
RMO Risk Management Organization
RSU Restricted stock unit
RUFC Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
S&P Standard & Poor's
SBIC Small Business Investment Company
SCAPSupervisory Capital Assessment Program
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
Short-Term Borrowings Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowed funds with original maturities of less than one year
Simulation Interest sensitivity simulation analysis
Susquehanna Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc., acquired by BB&T effective August 1, 2015
Swett & CrawfordCGSC North America Holdings Corporation, acquired by BB&T effective April 1, 2016
TBA To be announced
TDR Troubled debt restructuring
TETaxable-equivalent
U.S. United States of America
U.S. Treasury United States Department of the Treasury
UPB Unpaid principal balance
VAU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
VaR Value-at-risk
VIE Variable interest entity

2
TableofContents

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements”"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and the future performance of BB&T that are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the management of BB&T and the information available to management at the time that these disclosures were prepared. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,”"anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "forecasts," "intends," "plans," "projects," "may," "will," "should," "could," and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

·
l
general economic or business conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, slower deposit and/or asset growth, and a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit, insurance or other services;
·
l
disruptions to the national or global financial markets, including the impact of a downgrade of U.S. government obligations by one of the credit ratings agencies, and the adverse effects ofeconomic instability and recessionary conditions in Europe, and the impacteventual exit of recent market disruptions in China;the United Kingdom from the European Union;
·
l
changes in the interest rate environment, including interest rate changes made by the Federal Reserve, andas well as cash flow reassessments may reduce NIMnet interest margin and/or the volumes and values of loans made or held as well as the value of other financial assets held;
·
l
competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly;
·
l
legislative, regulatory or accounting changes, including changes resulting from the adoption and implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect the businesses in which BB&T is engaged;
·
l
local, state or federal taxing authorities may take tax positions that are adverse to BB&T;
·
l
a reduction may occur in BB&T’s&T's credit ratings;
·
l
adverse changes may occur in the securities markets;
·
l
competitors of BB&T may have greater financial resources or develop products that enable them to compete more successfully than BB&T and may be subject to different regulatory standards than BB&T;
l
·cyber-securitycybersecurity risks including “denial of service,” “hacking” and “identity theft,” could adversely affect ourBB&T's business and financial performance or our reputation, and weBB&T could be liable for financial losses incurred by third parties due to breaches of data shared between financial institutions;
l
·higher-than-expected costs related to information technology infrastructure or a failure to successfully implement future system enhancements could adversely impact BB&T's financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant additional costs to BB&T;
l
natural or other disasters, including acts of domestic or foreign terrorism, could have an adverse effect on BB&T, in that such events could materially disruptdisrupting BB&T’s&T's operations or the ability or willingness of BB&T’s customers to access the financial services BB&T offers;&T's products and services;
·
l
costs related to the integration of the businesses of BB&T and its merger partners may be greater than expected;
·
l
failure to execute on strategic or operational plans, including the ability to successfully complete and/or integrate mergers and acquisitions or fully achieve expected cost savings or revenue growth associated with mergers and acquisitions within the expected time frames could adversely impact financial condition and results of operations;
·
l
significant litigation and regulatory proceedings could have a material adverse effect on BB&T;
l
·unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or other claims and regulatory and other governmental investigations or other inquiries could result in negative publicity, protests, fines, penalties, restrictions on BB&T's operations or ability to expand its business and other negative consequences, all of which could cause reputational damage and adversely impact BB&T's financial conditions and results of operations;
l
risks resulting from the extensive use of models;
l
risk management measures may not be fully effective;
l
deposit attrition, customer loss and/or revenue loss following completed mergers and mergers/acquisitions may be greater than expected;
·higher than expected costs related to information technology infrastructure or a failure to successfully implement future system enhancements could adversely impact BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant additional costs to BB&T;exceed expectations; and
·
l
widespread system outages, caused by the failure of critical internal systems or critical services provided by third parties, could adversely impact BB&T’s&T's financial conditionscondition and results of operations.


Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.report, and should also consider the risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this report, including under the "Risk Factors" section. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statement. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, BB&T undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Readers should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature BB&T may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, or Current Reports on Form 8‑K.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS

BB&T is a FHC headquartered in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. BB&T conducts its business operations primarily through its bank subsidiary, Branch Bank, and other nonbank subsidiaries.

3

Operating Subsidiaries

Branch Bank (Winston-Salem, North Carolina), BB&T’s largest subsidiary, was chartered in 1872 and is the oldest bank headquartered in North Carolina. Branch Bank provides a wide range of banking and trust services for retail and commercial clients in its geographic markets, including small and mid-size businesses, public agencies, local governments and individuals, through 2,1392,049 offices (as of December 31, 2015)2017). Branch Bank’s principal operating subsidiaries include:

·BB&T Equipment Finance Corporation (Charlotte, North Carolina) provides loan and lease financing to commercial and small businesses;

·BB&T Insurance Services, Inc. (Raleigh, North Carolina) offers property and casualty, life, health, employee benefits, commercial general liability, surety, title and other insurance products through its agency network;

·BB&T Investment Services, Inc. (Charlotte, North Carolina) is a registered broker-dealer and offers clients non-deposit investment products, including discount brokerage services, equities, fixed-rate, variable-rate and index annuities, mutual funds, government and municipal bonds, and money market funds;

·CRC Insurance Services, Inc. (Birmingham, Alabama) is a wholesale insurance broker authorized to do business nationwide;

·Crump Life Insurance Services, Inc. (Roseland, New Jersey) is a wholesale insurance broker authorized to do business nationwide;

·Grandbridge (Charlotte, North Carolina) specializes in arranging and servicing commercial mortgage loans;

·McGriff, Seibels & Williams, Inc. (Birmingham, Alabama) is authorized to do business nationwide and specializes in providing insurance products on an agency basis to large commercial clients, including many Fortune 500 companies;

·Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation, Inc. (Florence, South Carolina) and its subsidiaries, which include AFCO Credit Corporation, provide insurance premium financing to clients in the United States and Canada; and

·Susquehanna Commercial Finance, Inc. (Malvern, Pennsylvania) provides loans and lease financing to commercial and small businesses.

BB&T Commercial Equipment Capital Corp. (Malvern, Pennsylvania) provides loans and lease financing to commercial and small businesses.

BB&T Equipment Finance Corporation (Charlotte, North Carolina) provides loan and lease financing to commercial and small businesses;

BB&T Insurance Services, Inc. (Raleigh, North Carolina) offers property and casualty, life, health, employee benefits, commercial general liability, surety, title and other insurance products through its agency network;

BB&T Investment Services, Inc. (Charlotte, North Carolina) was a registered broker-dealer and offers clients non-deposit investment products, including discount brokerage services, equities, fixed-rate, variable-rate and index annuities, mutual funds, government and municipal bonds, and money market funds. It merged with BB&T Securities, LLC effective January 1, 2018;

CRC Insurance Services, Inc. (Birmingham, Alabama) is a wholesale insurance broker authorized to do business nationwide;

Crump Life Insurance Services, Inc. (Parsippany, New Jersey) is a wholesale insurance broker authorized to do business nationwide;

Grandbridge (Charlotte, North Carolina) specializes in arranging and servicing commercial mortgage loans;

McGriff, Seibels & Williams, Inc. (Birmingham, Alabama) is authorized to do business nationwide and specializes in providing insurance products on an agency basis to large commercial clients, including many Fortune 500 companies;

Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation, Inc. (Florence, South Carolina) and its subsidiaries, which include AFCO Credit Corporation, provide insurance premium financing to clients in the United States and Canada; and

Major Nonbank Subsidiaries

BB&T also has a number of nonbank subsidiaries, including:

·BB&T Securities, LLC (Richmond, Virginia) is a registered investment banking and full-service brokerage firm that provides services in retail brokerage, equity and debt underwriting, investment advice, corporate finance and equity research; and facilitates the origination, trading and distribution of fixed-income securities and equity products in both the public and private capital markets. BB&T Securities, LLC also provides correspondent clearing services to broker-dealers and entities involved in the securities industry;

·Regional Acceptance Corporation (Greenville, North Carolina) specializes in nonprime, indirect financing for consumer purchases of primarily mid-model and late-model used automobiles; and

·Sterling Capital Management, LLC (Charlotte, North Carolina) is a registered investment advisor, which provides tailored investment management solutions to meet the specific needs and objectives of individual and institutional clients through a full range of investment strategies.

BB&T Securities, LLC (Richmond, Virginia) is a registered investment banking and full-service brokerage firm that provides services in retail brokerage, equity and debt underwriting, investment advice, corporate finance and equity research; and facilitates the origination, trading and distribution of fixed-income securities and equity products in both the public and private capital markets;

Regional Acceptance Corporation (Greenville, North Carolina) specializes in nonprime, indirect financing for consumer purchases of primarily mid-model and late-model used automobiles; and

Sterling Capital Management, LLC (Charlotte, North Carolina) is a registered investment advisor, which provides tailored investment management solutions to meet the specific needs and objectives of individual and institutional clients through a full range of investment strategies.


Services


BB&T’s subsidiaries offer a variety of services targeted to retail and commercial clients. BB&T’s objective is to offer clients a full array of products to meet all their financial needs. BB&T’s&T provides insurance operationsservices primarily consist of a wholesale/through its retail agency network.

and wholesale brokerage operations.
4

 Retail Services: Commercial Services:
 Asset management Asset management
 Automobile lending Association services
 Bankcard lending Capital markets services
 Consumer finance Commercial deposit and treasury services
 Home equity lending Commercial finance
 Home mortgage lending Commercial middle market lending
 Insurance Commercial mortgage lending
 Investment brokerage services Corporate banking
 Mobile/online banking Institutional trust servicesFloor plan lending
 Payment solutions InsuranceInstitutional trust services
 Retail deposit services Insurance premium finance
Sales financeInternational banking services
 Small business lending LeasingInsurance premium finance
 Wealth management/private banking MerchantInternational banking services
  Leasing
Merchant services
   Mortgage warehouse lending
   Payment solutions
   Private equity investments
   Real estate lending
   Supply chain management

Operating Segments

Refer to "Note 19. Operating Segments" for disclosures related to BB&T’s operating segments.

Market Area

The following table reflects BB&T’s deposit market share and branch locations by state:
Table 1
BB&T Deposit Market Share and Branch Locations by State
       
  % of BB&T's Deposits (2) Deposit Market Share Rank (2) Number of Branches (3)
North Carolina (1) 21% 2nd 328
Virginia 16
 4th 319
Florida 13
 7th 298
Pennsylvania 10
 6th 246
Georgia 8
 5th 144
Maryland 7
 6th 158
South Carolina 6
 3rd 102
Texas 4
 14th 117
Kentucky 4
 4th 99
West Virginia 4
 1st 68
Alabama 3
 6th 77
Tennessee 2
 8th 46
New Jersey 1
 16th 30
Washington, D.C. 1
 9th 12
(1)Excludes home office deposits.

Market Area
               
The following table reflects BB&T’s deposit market share and branch locations by state:
               
Table 1
BB&T Deposit Market Share and Branch Locations by State
               
       % of BB&T's Deposits (2) Deposit Market Share Rank (2) Number of Branches (3) 
 North Carolina (1)  23 %  2nd  357  
 Virginia  19    4th  358  
 Florida  14    6th  325  
 Georgia  10    5th  160  
 South Carolina  7    3rd  112  
 Maryland  6    7th  163  
 Kentucky  6    2nd  113  
 West Virginia  4    1st  76  
 Texas  4    14th  122  
 Alabama  3    5th  88  
 Tennessee  2    7th  49  
 Washington, D.C.  2    6th  13  
 Pennsylvania (4)  ―       ―     172  
 New Jersey (4)  ―        ―     28  
               
               
 (1)Excludes home office deposits.
 (2)Source: FDIC.gov-data as of June 30, 2015.
 (3)As of December 31, 2015. Excludes two branches in Indiana and one in Ohio.
 (4)Branch locations resulted from the acquisition of Susquehanna on August 1, 2015.

(2)Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence-data as of December 28, 2017.
(3)As of December 31, 2017. Excludes three branches in Ohio and two in Indiana.



BB&T operates in markets that have a diverse employment base covering numerous industries. Management strongly believes that BB&T’s community bank approach to providing client service is a competitive advantage that strengthens the Company’s ability to effectively provide financial products and services to businesses and individuals in its markets. Furthermore, BB&T believes its current market area will support growth in assets and deposits in the future.

5

Competition


The financial services industry is highly competitive and constantly evolving. BB&T’s subsidiaries compete actively with national, regional and local financial services providers, including banks, thrifts, securities dealers, mortgage bankers, finance companies and insurance companies. In recent years, competition has increased from institutions not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and BHCs. Consumers have the opportunity to select from a variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives. The industry frequently sees merger activity, which affects competition by eliminating some regional and local institutions, while strengthening the franchises of acquirers. For additional information concerning markets, BB&T’s competitive position and business strategies and recent government interventions, see “Market Area”"Market Area" above and “General"General Business Development”Development" below.


General Business Development


BB&T is a regional FHC and has maintained a long-term focus on a strategy that includes expansion of asset size and diversification in terms of revenues and sources of profitability. This strategy encompasses both organic growth and acquisitions of complementary banks and financial businesses.


Merger and Acquisition Strategy


BB&T’s growth in business, profitability and market share has historically been enhanced by strategic mergers and acquisitions. Management intends to remain disciplined and focused with regard toBB&T is not currently pursuing significant mergers or acquisitions, but will assess future merger and acquisition opportunities. BB&T will continue to assess bank and thrift acquisitions subject to market conditions,opportunities, primarily within or contiguous to BB&T’s existing footprint, based on market conditions and willmay pursue economically advantageous acquisitions of insurance agencies, specialized lending businesses and fee income generating financial services businesses. BB&T’s acquisition strategy is currently focusedwill focus on meeting the following criteria:

the organization must be a good fit with BB&T’s culture;

the acquisition criteria:

·the organization must be a good fit with BB&T’s culture;

·the acquisition must be strategically attractive – meaning that any bank acquisition should be in BB&T’s existing footprint to allow for cost savings and economies of scale or in contiguous states to provide market diversification, or the transaction must be otherwise strategically compelling;

·any risk-related issues would need to be quantified and addressed; and

·the transaction must meet BB&T’s financial criteria.

must be strategically attractive;


any risks must be identified and mitigation plans put in place to ensure any risks fall within BB&T’s risk appetite; and

the transaction must meet BB&T’s financial criteria.

Regulatory actions, such as the orders more fully discussed in the "BSA/AML and Suspicious Activity" section below, can limit BB&T’s and Branch Bank’s ability to pursue mergers and acquisitions for a period of time and require new or additional regulatory approvals before engaging in certain other business activities.

During 2016, BB&T acquired National Penn and Swett & Crawford. During 2015, BB&T completed the purchases of Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. and The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation. BB&T also acquired 41 retail branches in Texas from Citigroup. During 2014, BB&T purchased 21 retail branches in Texas from Citigroup. See Note 2 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information about these transactions.

BB&T has reached an agreement and received approval from applicable banking regulators to acquire National Penn Bancshares, Inc., which had $9.6 billion in assets and $6.7 billion in deposits as of December 31, 2015. This transaction is currently expected to close on April 1, 2016.


Regulatory Considerations


The extensive regulatory framework applicable to banks, BHCs and FHCsfinancial institutions is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the DIF and the stability of the financial system, rather than for the protection of shareholders and creditors. Comprehensive reform of the legislative and regulatory landscape occurred with the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act during 2010. Implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act and related rulemaking activities continues to occur. In addition to banking laws, regulations and regulatory agencies, BB&T is subject to various other laws, regulations, supervision and examination by other regulatory agencies, all of which directly or indirectly affect the operations and management of BB&T and its ability to make distributions to shareholders.

6

BB&T’s earnings are affected by general economic conditions, management policies, changes in state

The current administration and federalmembers of Congress have publicly disclosed proposals to change certain laws and regulations and actions of various regulatory authorities, including those referred to in this section.regulations. Proposals to change the laws and regulations to which BB&T is subject are frequently introduced at both the federal and state levels. The likelihood and timing of any such changes and the impact such changes may have on BB&T is impossible to determine with any certainty. 

The description hereinbelow summarizes the significant state and federal laws to which BB&T currently is subject. To the extent statutory or regulatory provisions are described in this section, suchThe descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions.

provisions summarized. The descriptions below do not summarize all possible or proposed changes in current laws or regulations.



Financial Regulatory Reform

During the past several years, there has been a significant increase in regulation and regulatory oversight for Oversight


U.S. financial services firms, primarily resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act.including BB&T, are subject to significant regulatory oversight. The Dodd-Frank Act is extensive, complex and comprehensive legislation that impacts practically all aspects of a banking organization, representing a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial services industry.organization. The Dodd-Frank Act implementshas led to numerous and far-reaching changes that affect financial companies, including banks, BHCs and FHCs such as BB&T.

Many of theinstitutions.


Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and other laws are subject to further rulemaking, guidance and interpretation by the applicable federal regulators. BB&T will continue to evaluate the impact of any new regulations so promulgated, including changes in regulatory costs and fees, modifications to consumer products or disclosures required by the CFPB and the requirements of the enhanced supervision provisions, among others.


As a BHC and a FHC under federal law, BB&T is subject to regulation under the BHCA and the examination and reporting requirements of the FRB. Branch Bank, a North Carolina state-chartered commercial bank, is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks,NCCOB, the FDIC and the CFPB.


In August 2017, the FRB proposed a new rating system that will apply to all BHCs with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more. Under the new rating system, component ratings would be assigned for capital planning and positions, liquidity risk management and positions, and governance and controls; however, a standalone composite rating would not be assigned. To be considered “well managed" under the proposed rating system, a firm must be rated “Satisfactory” or “Satisfactory Watch” for each of its three component ratings. Initial ratings would be assigned during 2018 under the proposal.

State and federal law govern the activities in which Branch Bank engages, the investments it makes, and the aggregate amount of loans that may be granted to one borrower. Various consumer and compliance laws and regulations also affect its operations. Branch Bank is also affected by the actions of the FRB as it implements monetary policy.


In addition to federal and state banking laws and regulations, BB&T and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those that engage in securities underwriting, dealing, brokerage, investment advisory and insurance activities, are subject to other federal and state laws and regulations as well as supervision and examination by other statefederal and federalstate regulatory agencies and other regulatory authorities, including the SEC, FINRA, NYSE and various state insurance and securities regulators.

NYSE.


FHC Regulation


Under current federal law, as a BHC, BB&T has elected to become a FHC, which allows it to offer customers virtually any type of service that is financial in nature or incidental thereto, including banking and activities closely related thereto, securities underwriting, insurance and merchant banking. In order to maintain its status as a FHC, BB&T and all of its affiliated IDIs must be well-capitalized and well-managed and have at least a satisfactory CRA rating. The FRB has responsibility for overseeing compliance with these requirements. If the FRB determines that a FHC is not well-capitalized or well-managed, the FHC has a period of time to comply, but during the period of noncompliance, the FRB can place any limitations on the FHC that it believes to be appropriate. Furthermore, if the FRB determines that a FHC has not maintained a satisfactory CRA rating, the FHC would not be able to commence any new financial activities or acquire a company that engages in such activities, although the FHC would still be allowed to engage in activities closely related to banking and make investments in the ordinary course of conducting banking activities.


Most of the financial activities that are permissible for FHCs also are permissible for a bank’s “financial"financial subsidiary," except for insurance underwriting, insurance company portfolio investments, real estate investments and development, and merchant banking, which must be conducted by a FHC. In order for a financial subsidiary of a bank to engage in permissible financial activities, federal law requires the parent bank (and its sister-bank affiliates) to be well-capitalized and well-managed; the aggregate consolidated assets of all of that bank’s financial subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of 45% of its consolidated total assets or $50 billion; the bank must have at least a satisfactory CRA rating; and, if that bank is one of the 100 largest national banks, it must meet certain financial rating or other comparable requirements.

7

Current federal law also establishes a system of functional regulation under which the FRB is the umbrella regulator for BHCs, but BHC affiliates are principally regulated by functional regulators such as the FDIC for state nonmember bank affiliates, the SEC for securities affiliates and state insurance regulators for insurance affiliates. Certain specific activities, including traditional bank trust and fiduciary activities, may be conducted in the bank without the bank being deemed a “broker”"broker" or a “dealer”"dealer" in securities for purposes of functional regulation. Although states generally must regulate bank insurance activities in a nondiscriminatory manner, states may continue to adopt and enforce rules that specifically regulate bank insurance activities in certain identifiable areas.

The Dodd-Frank Act also imposed new prudential regulation on depository institutions and their holding companies. As such, BB&T is subject to more stringent standards and requirements with respect to (1) bank and nonbank acquisitions and mergers, (2) the “financial activities” in which it engages as a FHC, (3) affiliate transactions and (4) proprietary trading, among other provisions.



Resolution Planning and Regulation QQ


FRB and FDIC regulations require “covered companies”"covered companies" such as BB&T and systemically important financial institutions such as Branch Bank to file, maintain and update plans for a rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure (a “living will”"living will"). Both the FRB and the FDIC must review and evaluate BB&T’s and Branch Bank’s living wills and are authorized to impose restrictions on BB&T’s and Branch Bank’s growth and activities or operations if deemed necessary. The public portions of BB&T’s and Branch Bank’sthe resolution plans are available in the Additional Disclosures section of the Investor Relations site atwww.bbt.combbt.investorroom.com/additional-disclosures.


CCAR and Stress Test Requirements

Current


FRB rules require BB&T and other BHCs with $50 billion or more of total consolidated assets to submit annual capital plans based on pre-defined stress scenarios. BB&T and other such BHCs areis also required to collect and report certain related data on a monthly and quarterly basis to allow the FRB to monitor progress against the BHCs’ annual capital plans. Covered BHCs, includingplan. BB&T may pay dividends and repurchase stock only in accordance with a capital plan that has been reviewed by the FRB and as to which the FRBthat has not objected. The rules also require, among other things, that a covered BHC may not make areceived any objections from the FRB. A capital distribution unless,can only occur if, after giving effect to the distribution, it will meet all minimum regulatory capital ratios.ratios will be maintained, including a post-stress Basel III CET1 ratio of at least 4.5%. See Table 332 for additional information about capitalBasel III requirements. The FRB did not object to BB&T’s 20152017 capital plan, and the 2016 capital plan is expected to be submitted during April 2016.

plan.


The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FRB to conductconducts an annual supervisory stress test for BHCs, such asand requires that BB&T with $50 billion or more of total consolidated assets. The FRB’s stress test rules also require BB&T and other covered BHCs to conduct a separate mid-yearmid-cycle stress test, file the results of such test with the FRB and publicly disclose details of the scenario and the impact on its capital. The FDIC requires Branch Bank to conduct annual company-run stress tests. BB&T’s annual and midcyclemid-cycle stress test results are available in the Additional Disclosures section of the Investor Relations site on www.bbt.com.

Effective for 2015, the FRB amended the capital plan and stress test rules to modify theits website at bbt.investorroom.com/additional-disclosures.


The start date of the capital plan andannual stress test cycles from October 1 tocycle is January 1 of the following calendar year. The FRB also amended the capital plan rule to limit a BHC’s ability toperiod starts July 1 of the following calendar year. A BHC can only make capital distributions to the extent the BHC’s actual capital issuances are less than the amount indicatedas provided for in its capital plan.

FRB rules limit the amount of capital that can be distributed by CCAR banks to shareholders outside of an approved capital plan under baseline conditions, measured onwithout seeking prior approval from the FRB. Additionally, the FRB rules contain a quarterly basis.

The Dodd-Frank Act also requiresblackout period in the FDICsecond quarter of each year during which a firm cannot change its capital distribution plan. BB&T is not subject to conduct an annual supervisory stress testthe qualitative assessment of CCAR for FDIC-insured state nonmember banks suchBHCs as Branch Bank with $50 billion or more ofBB&T's total consolidated assets are between $50 billion and requires such institutions$250 billion. BB&T has maintained and intends to conduct annual company-run stress tests. The results ofmaintain the annual supervisory stress test are included in the annual capital plan submittedprocesses and infrastructure to the FDIC.

The FDIC has modified the “as-of” dates for financial data that covered banks with more than $10 billion in assets will use to perform their stress tests as well as the reporting dates and public disclosure dates of the annual stress tests. The revisions to the regulations became effective on January 1, 2016.

facilitate future compliance.


Acquisitions


BB&T complies with numerous laws related to its acquisition activity. Under the BHCA, a BHC may not directly or indirectly acquire ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any BHC or bank or merge or consolidate with another BHC without the prior approval of the FRB.

8

Current federal law authorizes interstate acquisitions of banks and BHCs without geographic limitation, and a bank headquartered in one state is authorized to merge with a bank headquartered in another state, subject to market share limitations, regulatory approvals and any state requirement that the target bank shall have been in existence and operating for a minimum period of time. After a bank has established branches in a state through an interstate merger transaction, the bank may establish and acquire additional branches at any location in the state where a bank headquartered in that state could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal or state law. These regulatory considerations are applicable to privately negotiated acquisition transactions.


FRB rules prohibit a financial company from combining with another company if the ratio of the resulting company's liabilities exceeds 10 percent10% of the aggregate consolidated liabilities of all financial companies.


Other Safety and Soundness Regulations


The FRB has enforcement powers over BHCs and their nonbanking subsidiaries. The FRB has authority to prohibit activities that represent unsafe or unsound practices or constitute violations of law, rule, regulation, administrative order or written agreement with a federal regulator. These powers may be exercised through the issuance of cease and desist orders, civil money penalties or other actions.



There also are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on BHCs and their depository institutionIDI subsidiaries by federal law and regulatory policy that are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the FDIC insurance fund in the event the depository institutionIDI is insolvent or is in danger of becoming insolvent. For example, under requirements of the FRB with respect to BHC operations,requires a BHC is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutionsIDIs and to commit financial resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so otherwise. In addition, the “cross-guarantee”"cross-guarantee" provisions of federal law require IDIs under common control to reimburse the FDIC for any loss suffered or reasonably anticipated by the DIF as a result of the insolvency or potential failure of commonly controlled IDIs or for any assistance provided by the FDIC to commonly controlled IDIs in danger of failure.IDIs. The FDIC’s claim for reimbursement under the cross-guarantee provisions is superior to claims of shareholders of the IDI or its holding company but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and nonaffiliated holders of subordinated debt of the commonly controlled IDI.

Federal and state bankingdebt.


Banking regulators also have broad enforcement powers over Branch Bank, including the power to impose fines and other civil and criminal penalties, and to appoint a receiver in order to conserve the assets of Branch Bank for the benefit of depositors and other creditors. The North Carolina Commissioner of BanksNCCOB also has the authority to take possession of a North Carolina state bank in certain circumstances, including, among other things, when it appears that such bank has violated its charter or any applicable laws, is conducting its business in an unauthorized or unsafe manner, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to transact its business or has an impairment of its capital stock.


Payment of Dividends; Capital Requirements


The Parent Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from Branch Bank and its subsidiaries. The majority of the Parent Company’s revenue is from dividends paid by Branch Bank. Branch Bank, is subject towhich are limited by laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay.regulations. In addition, BB&T and Branch Bank are subject to various regulatory restrictions relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintainregulatory capital at or above regulatory minimums and the requirement to remain “well-capitalized”"well-capitalized" under the prompt corrective action regulations summarized elsewhere in this section. Federal bankingBanking regulators have indicated that banking organizationsdividends should generally pay dividends only be paid if (1) the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. BB&T’s future capital actions will depend on the FRB’s review of BB&T’s annual capital plans.


North Carolina law states that, provided a bank does not make distributions that reduce its capital below its applicable required capital, the board of directors of a bank chartered under the laws of North Carolina may declare such distributions as the directors deem proper.


The federal banking agencies are required to take “prompt"prompt corrective action”action" in respect of IDIs and their BHCsfinancial institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The law establishes five capital categories for this purpose: “well-capitalized,” “adequately"well-capitalized," "adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized”" "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized" and “critically"critically undercapitalized." To be considered “well-capitalized” under these standards,"well-capitalized," an IDI must maintain theminimum capital ratios shown above and must not be subject to any order or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.

9

Federal law also requires the regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for institutions that fail to meet minimum capital requirements within the five capital categories, with progressively more severe restrictions on operations, management and capital distributions according to the category in which an institution is placed. Additionally, failure to meet capital requirements may cause an institution to be directed to raise additional capital. Federal law further mandates that the agencies adopt safety and soundness standards generally relating to operations and management, asset quality and executive compensation, and authorizes administrative action against an institution that fails to meet such standards.


In addition, failure to meet capital guidelines may subject a banking organization to a variety of other enforcement remedies, including additional substantial restrictions on its operations and activities, termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and, under certain conditions, the appointment of a conservator or receiver.

U.S. Implementation


In October 2017, the federal banking agencies proposed revisions that would simplify compliance with certain aspects of capital rules. A majority of the proposed simplifications would apply solely to banking organizations that are not subject to the advanced approaches capital rule. The proposed rules simplify application of regulatory capital treatment for mortgage servicing assets, certain deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences, investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions, and capital issued by a consolidated subsidiary of a banking organization and held by third parties (minority interest), and; revisions to the treatment of certain acquisition, development, or construction exposures. In addition, the federal banking agencies have deferred the final phase-in and increased risk-weighting associated with CET1 deductions indefinitely for non-advanced approaches banks.

Basel III

During 2013,


The U.S. capital requirements follow the FRB published final rules establishingaccord of the BCBS. The Company currently qualifies as a new comprehensivestandardized approach banking organization under the FRB's Basel III capital framework for U.S. banking organizations known as Basel III.rules. The rules substantially revisestipulate the risk-based capital requirements applicable to BHCs and IDIs including BB&T and Branch Bank. The rules define the components of capital and address other issuesareas affecting banking institutions' regulatory capital ratios. The rules also address risk weights and other issuesitems affecting the denominator in banking institutions' regulatory capital ratios, and replace the existing risk-weighting approach, which was derived from Basel I capital accords of the BCBS, withrules use a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, onthan the standardized approach in the BCBS's 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. The Baselpre-Basel III rules also implement the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act to remove references to credit ratings from the federal banking agencies' rules. BB&T qualifies as a standardized approach banking organization and was required to comply with the new requirements beginning on January 1, 2015.



Institutions with greater than $250 billion in assets or $10 billion in foreign assets are considered advanced approaches banking organizations, which results in a more complex calculation of RWArisk-weighted assets that includes an assessment of the impact of operational risk, among other changes.differences. In addition, advanced approaches institutions have additional reporting requirements and must calculate capital under both the standardized approach and the advanced approaches and use the more conservative result. BB&T is preparing to comply with the advanced approaches requirements as it would become subject to these requirements upon exceeding either of the asset thresholds.


The Basel III rules, among other things, (1) introduceinclude a new capital measure referred to as common equity Tier 1;CET1; (2) specify that Tier 1 capital consistconsists of Tier 1 common equity and additional Tier 1 capital instruments meeting specified requirements; (3) define Tier 1 common equity narrowly by requiring that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to Tier 1 common equity and not to the other components of capital; and (4) expand the scope of the deductions/adjustments from capital as compared to existingprior regulations.


The Basel III rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets. The Basel III risk weight classifications generally range from 0% for U.S. government securities to 600% for certain equity exposures, with a maximum risk weight classification of 1,250% for certain securitizations. This results in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. In addition, the rules provide more advantageous risk weights for derivatives and repurchase-style transactions cleared through a qualifying central counterparty and increase the scope of eligible guarantors and eligible collateral for purposes of credit risk mitigation.


The Basel III rules revise the “prompt corrective action” directives by establishingalso establish more conservative ratio levels for well-capitalized status. In addition to the minimum risk-based capital requirements, all banks must hold additional capital, referred to as the capital conservation buffer (which is in the form of common equity), to avoid being subject to limits on capital distributions such as dividend payments, discretionary payments on Tier 1 instruments, share buybacks, and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, including heads of major business lines and similar employees.officers. The required amount of the capital conservation buffer will beis being phased-in annually over four years, through January 1, 2019.

BB&T is considered to be a “modified LCR” holding company. BB&T would be subject to full LCR The capital conservation buffer requirements if its operations were to fall underdo not currently result in any limitations on distributions or discretionary bonuses for Branch Bank.


See the “internationally active” rules, which would generally be triggered if"Liquidity" section in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information about BB&T’s assets were to increase above $250 billion.&T's liquidity requirements.

See the "Capital" section in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information about BB&T produces LCR calculations to effectively manage the position of High-Quality Liquid Assets and the balance sheet deposit mix to optimize BB&T’s liquidity position. BB&T’s LCR was approximately 130% at December 31, 2015, compared to the regulatory minimum for such entities of 90%, which puts BB&T in full compliance with the rule. The regulatory minimum will increase to 100% on January 1, 2017.

10
&T's capital requirements.

The following table summarizes the capital requirements and BB&T’s internal targets under Basel III:
                         
Table 2
Capital Under Basel III
                         
     Minimum Well- Minimum Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer BB&T
     Capital Capitalized 2016  2017  2018  2019 (1) Target
Common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets  4.5 %  6.5 %  5.125 %  5.750 %  6.375 %  7.000 %  8.5 %
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets  6.0    8.0    6.625    7.250    7.875    8.500    10.0  
Total capital to risk-weighted assets  8.0    10.0    8.625    9.250    9.875    10.500    12.0  
Leverage ratio  4.0    5.0   N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A   8.0  
                         
                         
(1)BB&T's goal is to maintain capital levels above the 2019 requirements.

BB&T's capital ratios are shown in the following table:
              
Table 3
Capital Adequacy Ratios
December 31, 2015
              
      BB&T Branch Bank 
              
 Common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets   10.3 %   11.3 % 
 Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets   11.8     11.3   
 Total capital to risk-weighted assets   14.3     13.4   
 Leverage ratio   9.8     9.3   

HMDA Regulations


The CFPB has issued final rules changing the reporting requirements for lenders under the HMDA. The new rules expand the range of transactions subject to these requirements to include most securitized residential mortgage closed-end loans and credit lines. The rules also increase the overall amount of data required to be collected and submitted, including additional data points about the applicable loans and expanded data about the borrowers. BB&T will beis required to begin collecting the expanded data on January 1, 2018.

Enhanced Prudential Standards


Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

During 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. Among other changes, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly changes corporate income tax law by reducing the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, creating a territorial tax system, allowing for BHCsimmediate capital expensing of certain qualified property, and Foreign Banking

eliminating the deductibility of DIF assessments. The FRB has adopted amendmentstax laws are generally effective for the 2018 tax year. However, BB&T recognized certain effects of changes in tax laws in 2017, which was when the new legislation was enacted. Refer to Regulation YY to implement certain components"Note 11. Income Taxes" for additional disclosures regarding the impact of the enhanced prudential standards required to be established under Section 165 of the Dodd-FrankTax Cuts and Jobs Act. The amendments became effective during 2014. The enhanced prudential standards include risk-based and leverage capital requirements, liquidity standards, requirements for overall risk management, stress-test requirements, and a 15-to-1 debt-to-equity limit for companies that the Financial Stability Oversight Council has determined pose a grave threat to financial stability. The amendments also establish risk committee requirements and capital stress-testing requirements for certain BHCs and foreign banking organizations with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more.

FATCA and Conforming Regulations

During 2014, the IRS issued Notice 2014-33 (the “Notice”) regarding FATCA and its related withholding provisions. The Notice announced that calendar years 2014 and 2015 are regarded as a transition period for purposes of IRS enforcement and administration with respect to the implementation of FATCA by withholding agents, foreign financial institutions and other entities with IRC chapter 4 responsibilities. The Notice also announced the IRS’s intention to further amend the regulations under Sections 1441, 1442, 1471, and 1472 of the IRC. Prior to the IRS issuing these amendments, taxpayers may rely on the provisions of the Notice regarding the proposed amendments to the regulations. The transition period and other guidance described in the Notice are intended to facilitate an orderly transition for withholding agent and foreign financial institution compliance with FATCA’s requirements and respond to comments regarding certain aspects of the regulations under chapters 3 and 4 of the IRC. The new requirements became effective on December 31, 2015. BB&T is in compliance with the applicable requirements.

11

Volcker Rule


The Volcker Rule implements section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act and prohibits IDIs and affiliated companies ("banking entities")their affiliates from engaging in short-term proprietary trading of certain securities, derivatives, and commodity futures and options on these instruments, for their own account. The final rulesrule provides certain exemptions and also impose limits on banking entities' investments in, and other relationships with, hedge funds or private equity funds. Like the Dodd-Frank Act, the rules provide exemptions for certain activities, including market making, underwriting, hedging, trading in government obligations, insurance company activities, and organizing and offering hedge funds or private equity funds. The rules also clarifyclarifies that certain activities are not prohibited, including acting as agent, broker, or custodian.

The compliance requirements under the rules vary based on the size of the banking entity and the scope of activities conducted. Banking entities with significant trading operations will be required to establish a detailed compliance program, and their CEOs will be required to attest that the program is reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the final rules. Independent testing and analysis of an institution's compliance program also will be required. The final rules reduce the burden on smaller, less-complex institutions by limiting their compliance and reporting requirements. Additionally, a banking entity that does not engage in covered trading activities will not need to establish a compliance program.

Banking entities were required to conform proprietary trading activities to the final rule by July 21, 2015.


The FRB extended the compliance deadline torule also imposes limits on certain relationships with hedge funds or private equity funds. The rule became effective on July 21, 2016 (and announced the intention to further extend the deadline to July 21, 2017)2017 for purposes of conforming investments in and relationships with covered funds and foreigncertain funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013. Complying with theseThese requirements isdid not expected to have a material impact on BB&T’s&T's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Deposit Insurance



DIF Assessments


Branch Bank’s deposits are insured by the DIF of the FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. The FDIC imposes a risk-based deposit premium assessment system that determines assessment rates for an IDI based on an assessment rate calculator, which is based on a number of elements to measure the risk each IDI poses to the DIF. The assessment rate is applied to total average assets less tangible equity, as defined under the Dodd-Frank Act. The assessment rate schedule can change from time to time at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits. Under the current system, premiums are assessed quarterly.

Pursuant to an existing


The FDIC rule, regular assessment rates for all banks will decline when the reserve ratio reaches 1.15%, which the FDIC expects will occur in early 2016. However, during 2015, the FDIC proposedadopted a final rule that would impose on banks with at least $10 billion in assetsimposes a surcharge of 4.5 cents per $100 of theirthe assessment base, after making certain adjustments, for banks with total assets of at least $10 billion. The surcharge became effective July 1, 2016 and will last for a period currently estimated by the FDIC to be two years. BB&T estimatesyears but ending no later than December 31, 2018. If the DIF has not reached the required level at that time, then the FDIC will impose a special assessment on institutions with assets greater than $10 billion. The net effect of the proposed changes would increasenew surcharge increased BB&T’s&T's total annual assessment by an amount within the range of $40$84 million to $50 million.

for 2017.


Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations


In connection with its lending and leasing activities, Branch Bank is subject to a number of federal and state laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the economy and population. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and their respective state law counterparts.


CFPB


The CFPB has broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the laws referenced above, fair lending laws and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets, their service providers and certain non-depository entities such as debt collectors and consumer reporting agencies. The CFPB has authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products.


The Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and, in certain circumstances, permits state attorneys general to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.

12

The CFPB has concentrated much of its rulemaking efforts on a variety of mortgage-related topics required under the Dodd-Frank Act, including mortgage origination disclosures, minimum underwriting standards and ability to repay, high-cost mortgage lending, and servicing practices. The rules related to ability to repay, qualified mortgage standards and mortgage servicing became effective during 2014, while the escrow and loan originator compensation rules became effective during 2013.

A final rule integrating mortgage loan disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act (“RESPA”) became effective during October 2015. The final rule consolidated four existing and separate disclosures required under TILA and RESPA for closed-end credit transactions secured by real property into two forms with a view towards making the mortgage loan disclosures less confusing and more consumer friendly. Branch Bank delivered the functionality required to meet the effective date of October 3, 2015 for the new integrated disclosures.

As a result of these rules, BB&T transferred the management of certain home equity loans from direct retail lending within the Community Banking segment to the Residential Mortgage Banking segment during 2014.

Interchange Fees

The FRB adopted rules establishing standards for assessing whether the interchange fees that may be charged with respect to certain electronic debit transactions are “reasonable and proportional” to the costs incurred by issuers for such transactions. Interchange fees, or “swipe” fees, are charges that merchants pay to BB&T and other card-issuing banks for processing electronic payment transactions.

During 2013, a U.S. Federal District Court judge ruled against the debit card interchange fee limits imposed by the FRB, resulting in the potential for further reductions to these caps. During March 2014, the Washington, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the 2013 lower court decision. During January 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, which preserved the limits established by the FRB.

Privacy

Federal law contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions, including substantial customer privacy protections provided under the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (commonly known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). Under these provisions, a financial institution must provide to its customers, at the inception of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institution’s policies and procedures regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. These provisions also provide that, except for certain limited exceptions, an institution may not provide such personal information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that such information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. Federal law makes it a criminal offense, except in limited circumstances, to obtain or attempt to obtain customer information of a financial nature by fraudulent or deceptive means.

CRA

The CRA requires Branch Bank’s primary federal bank regulatory agency, the FDIC, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and persons. Institutions are assigned one of four ratings: “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” This assessment is reviewed for any bank that applies to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an IDI, or to open or relocate a branch office. The CRA record of each subsidiary bank of a FHC, such as BB&T, also is assessed by the FRB in connection with any acquisition or merger application.

Automated Overdraft Payment Regulation

The FRB and FDIC have enacted consumer protection regulations related to automated overdraft payment programs offered by financial institutions. Regulation E prohibits financial institutions from charging consumers fees for paying overdrafts on automated teller machine and one-time debit card transactions, unless a consumer consents, or opts in, to the overdraft service for those types of transactions. Financial institutions must also provide consumers with a notice that explains the financial institution’s overdraft services, including the fees associated with the service and the consumer’s choices. In addition, FDIC-supervised institutions must monitor overdraft payment programs for “excessive or chronic” customer use and undertake “meaningful and effective” follow-up action with customers that overdraw their accounts more than six times during a rolling 12-month period. Financial institutions must also impose daily limits on overdraft charges, review and modify check-clearing procedures, prominently distinguish account balances from available overdraft coverage amounts and ensure board and management oversight regarding overdraft payment programs.

13

Patriot Act


The Patriot Act is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement agencies and intelligence communities to cooperate in the prevention, detection and prosecution of international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The Patriot Act contains anti-money laundering measures affecting IDIs, broker-dealers and certain other financial institutions. The Patriot Act includes the IMLAFA,International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001, which requires such financial institutions to implement policies and procedures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and grants the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury broad authority to establish regulations and to impose requirements and restrictions on financial institutions’ operations. The U.S. Treasury continues to issue regulations to implement the Patriot Act which imposeimposes substantial obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controlsprocesses to detect, prevent and report money laundering, terrorist financing and terrorist financing.other financial crimes. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions, reputation damage, or restrictions on business. In addition, the Patriot Act requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities when reviewing bank mergers and BHC acquisitions.


BSA/AML and Suspicious Activity

BB&T expectsis subject to continuea number of anti-money laundering laws and regulations as a result of being a financial company headquartered in the United States. AML requirements are primarily derived from the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA Patriot Act. These laws and regulations are designed to prevent the financial system from being used by criminals to hide illicit proceeds and to impede terrorists’ ability to access and move funds used in support of terrorist activities. Among other things, BSA/AML laws and regulations require financial institutions to establish AML programs that meet certain standards, including, in some instances, expanded reporting, particularly in the area of suspicious transactions, and enhanced information gathering and recordkeeping requirements. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations or maintain adequate AML related controls can lead to significant monetary penalties and reputational damage.

BB&T has established and continues to maintain an AML program designed to ensure that, at a minimum, BB&T is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations related to AML and anti-terrorist financing initiatives. The AML program provides for a system of internal controls to ensure that appropriate due diligence and, when necessary, enhanced due diligence, including obtaining and maintaining appropriate documentation, is conducted at account opening and updated, as necessary, through the course of the client relationship. The AML program is also designed to ensure there are appropriate methods of monitoring transactions and account relationships to identify potentially suspicious activity and report suspicious activity to governmental authorities in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In addition, the AML program requires the training of appropriate personnel with regard to AML and anti-terrorist financing issues and provides for independent testing to ensure that the AML program is in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Non-compliance with BSA/AML laws or failure to maintain adequate policies and procedures can lead to significant monetary penalties and reputational damage, and federal regulators evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering when determining whether to approve a bank merger, BHC acquisitions or other expansionary activity.

During December 2016, Branch Bank entered into a consent order with the FDIC and the NCCOB and in January 2017, BB&T entered into a cease and desist order with the FRB and NCCOB. These orders call for corrective actions and enhancements to address certain internal control deficiencies within the BSA/AML Compliance Program. No criminal activity has been identified as the result of such deficiencies, and no financial penalty was levied. During 2017, BB&T made significant progress in addressing matters identified in the consent order, as well as the cease and desist order. BB&T continues to devote significant resources to its BSA/AML program.

By May 11, 2018, BB&T must comply with new provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (“BSA/AML”)Act: “Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions.” These new requirements, among other things, will require BB&T to collect information on the beneficial ownership and controlling person of legal entity clients and then verify their identity.

The U.S. Treasury's OFAC rules prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in financial transactions with certain individuals, entities, or countries, identified as “Specially Designated Nationals,” such as terrorists and narcotics traffickers. These rules require the blocking of assets held by, and prohibit transfers of property to such individuals, entities or countries. Blocked assets, such as property or bank deposits, cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. BB&T maintains an OFAC program particularlydesigned to ensure compliance with OFAC requirements. Failure to comply with such requirements could subject BB&T to serious legal and reputational consequences, including criminal penalties.

Privacy

Federal law contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions, including those provided under the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (commonly known as risks persistently emergethe Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). Under these provisions, a financial institution must provide to its customers, at the inception of the customer relationship and evolveannually thereafter, the institution’s policies and asprocedures regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. The privacy provisions include an exception under which if a financial institution meets certain conditions, it is not required to provide annual privacy notices to customers. In August 2017, the CFPB finalized a rule implementing this provision, with an effective date of October 1, 2018.

An institution may not provide customers’ nonpublic personal financial information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that such information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. Federal law makes it a criminal offense, except in limited circumstances, to obtain or attempt to obtain customer information by fraudulent or deceptive means.


CRA

The CRA requires Branch Bank’s primary federal bank regulatory expectations escalate.

agency, the FDIC, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and persons. Institutions are assigned one of four ratings: "Outstanding," "Satisfactory," "Needs to Improve" or "Substantial Noncompliance." This assessment is reviewed for any bank that applies to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an IDI, or to open or relocate a branch office. The CRA record of each subsidiary bank of a FHC also is assessed by the FRB in connection with any acquisition or merger application.


Automated Overdraft Payment Regulation

There are federal consumer protection laws related to automated overdraft payment programs offered by financial institutions. The FRB prohibits financial institutions from charging consumers fees for paying overdrafts on automated teller machine and one-time debit card transactions, unless a consumer consents, or opts in, to the overdraft service. Financial institutions must also provide consumers with a notice that explains the financial institution’s overdraft services, including the associated fees and the consumer’s choices. In addition, FDIC-supervised institutions must monitor overdraft payment programs for "excessive or chronic" customer use and undertake "meaningful and effective" follow-up action with customers that overdraw their accounts more than six times during a rolling 12-month period. Financial institutions must also impose daily limits on overdraft charges, review and modify check-clearing procedures, prominently distinguish account balances from available overdraft coverage amounts and ensure board and management oversight regarding overdraft payment programs.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

The SEC has adopted amendments to Item 402 of Regulation S-K to require the disclosure of: (1) the median compensation amount of the annual total compensation of all employees of a registrant (excluding the CEO), (2) the annual total compensation of that registrant’sregistrant's CEO and (3) the ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (excluding the CEO) to the annual total compensation of the CEO. The rules will require such pay ratio disclosureThis information for the first fiscal year beginningended December 31, 2017 will be included in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2018 Meeting of Shareholders.

DOL Fiduciary Rule

During April 2016, the DOL issued a final rule related to fiduciary standards in regards to the investing of clients' retirement assets. The final rule expands the definition of a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Those who provide investment advice to plans, plan sponsors, fiduciaries, plan participants, beneficiaries and IRAs and IRA owners must either avoid payments that create conflicts of interest or comply with the protective terms of an exemption issued by the DOL. Under new exemptions adopted with the rule, financial institutions will be obligated to acknowledge their status and the status of their individual advisers as "fiduciaries." Firms and advisers will be required to make prudent investment recommendations without regard to their own interests, or the interests of those other than the customer; charge only reasonable compensation; and make no misrepresentations to their customers regarding recommended investments. Additionally, the new rule requires certain disclosures to be made to the investor, and ongoing compliance must be monitored and documented.

During 2017, the DOL issued extensions on implementation of certain aspects of the final rule to allow additional time to evaluate the impacts of the rule and extend the phase in period. Thus, the requirements under the rule are being phased in through July 1, 2019. The impact on BB&T of the implementation of such requirements for 2017 was not significant.
FDIC Recordkeeping Requirements

The FDIC has released a final rule to facilitate prompt payment of FDIC-insured deposits when large IDIs fail. The rule requires IDIs with two million or after Januarymore deposit accounts to maintain complete and accurate data on each depositor's ownership interest by right and capacity and to develop the capability to calculate the insured and uninsured amounts for each deposit owner by ownership right and capacity. Compliance with the rule is required by April 1, 2017.

2020. This rule is expected to result in additional costs to BB&T; however, the amount has not been quantified.


Cybersecurity

The CISA which became effective on December 18, 2015, is intended to improve cybersecurity in the U.S. by enhanced sharing of information about security threats among the U.S. government and private sector entities, including financial institutions. The CISA also authorizes companies to monitor their own systems notwithstanding any other provision of law, and allows companies to carry out defensive measures on their own systems from cyber attacks. The law includes liability protections for companies that share cyber threat information with third parties so long as such sharing activity is conducted in accordance with CISA.


Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements

During May 2016, several financial regulators jointly issued a proposed rule designed to prohibit incentive-based compensation arrangements that could encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to a material financial loss. The proposed rule would require the applicable compensation arrangements to be considered against a number of factors, including a requirement that the arrangements contain both financial and non-financial measures of performance. In addition, the requirements would differ based on the size of the institution, and institutions with assets exceeding $50 billion would be subject to mandatory deferral, forfeiture/adjustment and clawback requirements for employees subject to the rule.

Other Regulatory Matters

BB&T is subject to examinations by federal and state banking regulators, as well as the SEC, the FINRA, the NYSE, various taxing authorities and various state insurance and securities regulators. BB&T periodically receives requests for information from regulatory authorities in various states, including state insurance commissions and state attorneys general, securities regulators and other regulatory authorities, concerning BB&T’s business and accounting practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business.

Employees

At

For the quarter ended December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T had approximately 37,20036,484 full-time equivalent employees, the majority of which were full time, compared to approximately 33,40037,481 full-time equivalent employees atfor the quarter ended December 31, 2014.

2016.


Website Access to BB&T’s Filings with the SEC

BB&T’s electronic filings with the SEC, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended, are made available at no cost in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website,www.bbt.comBBT.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after BB&T files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. BB&T’s SEC filings are also available through the SEC’s website atwww.sec.govsec.gov.

14

Corporate Governance


Information with respect to BB&T’s Board of Directors, Executive Officers and corporate governance policies and principles is presented on BB&T’s website,www.bbt.com, and includes:

·Corporate Governance Guidelines

·Corporate Board of Directors, including Biographical Information

·Committees of the Corporate Board of Directors and Committee Charters

·Codes of Ethics for Directors, Senior Financial Officers and Associates

·Executive Officers, including Biographical Information

·Policy and Procedures for Accounting, Securities and Legal Complaints, including Whistleblower Procedures

·Statement of Political Activity

BB&T intends to disclose any substantive amendments or waivers to the Codes of Ethics for Directors or Senior Financial Officers on BB&T’s website atwww.bbt.com.

15
BBT.com.


Executive Officers of BB&T

Executive Officer Recent Work Experience Years of Service Age
Kelly S. King Chairman since January 2010. Chief Executive Officer since January 2009. 43  67 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer     
        
Christopher L. Henson Chief Operating Officer since January 2009. 31 54
Chief Operating Officer     
        
Daryl N. Bible Chief Financial Officer since January 2009. 8 54 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Financial Officer     
        
W. Bennett Bradley President, Payment Solutions since September 30 54
Senior Executive Vice President and 2005. Chief Digital Officer since January 2016.    
Chief Digital Officer      
       
Ricky K. Brown President, Community Banking since July 2004. 38 60 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
President, Community Banking     
        
Barbara F. Duck Enterprise Risk Manager from July 2009 to December 2015. Data and Technology Services Manager since January 2016. 28  49 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Data and Technology Services Manager     
        
Donna C. Goodrich Deposit Services Manager since April 2004. Deposit and Operations Services Manager since January 2016. 30  53 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Deposit and Operations Services Manager     
        
Robert J. Johnson, Jr. General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Corporate Governance Officer since September 2010. 11  43

  Senior Executive Vice President and

General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Corporate Governance Officer

     
       
Clarke R. Starnes III Chief Risk Officer since July 2009. 33  56 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Risk Officer     
        
David H. Weaver Community Banking Group Executive since 20  49 

Senior Executive Vice President and

Community Banking Group Executive

 December 2010.    
       
Steven B. Wiggs Chief Marketing Officer since February 2005. Lending Group Manager since July 2009. 36  58 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Marketing Officer and Lending     
Group Manager      
        
Cynthia A. Williams Chief Corporate Communications Officer since June 2009. 30  63 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Corporate Communications Officer     
        
W. Rufus Yates President and CEO of BB&T Securities since January 2013. President and CEO of Scott & Stringfellow, LLC from 2009 through 2012. 29  58 
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Capital Markets Manager     

16
Executive Officer Recent Work Experience Yrs of Service Age
Kelly S. King Chairman since January 2010. Chief Executive Officer since January 2009. 45 69
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer    
Christopher L. Henson President since December 2016. Chief Operating Officer since January 2009. 33 56
President and Chief Operating Officer    
Daryl N. Bible Chief Financial Officer since January 2009. 10 56
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Financial Officer     
Clarke R. Starnes III Chief Risk Officer since July 2009. 35 58
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Risk Officer     
W. Bennett Bradley Chief Digital Officer since January 2016. President, Payment Solutions from September 2005 to December 2015. 32 56
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Digital Officer     
Barbara F. Duck Chief Information Officer since July 2016. Data and Technology Services Manager from January 2016 to June 2016. Enterprise Risk Manager from July 2009 to December 2015. 30 51
Senior Executive Vice President and    
Chief Information Officer    
Jim. D. Godwin Chief Credit Officer since January 2018. Deputy Chief Risk Officer from January 2016 to December 2017. Chief Operational Risk Officer from September 2012 to December 2015. Credit Risk Review Manager from May 2009 to September 2012. 22 49
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Credit Officer     
Donna C. Goodrich Deposit, Operations and Fraud Manager since November 2017. Deposit, Payment and Operations Services Manager from January 2016 to October 2017. Deposit Services Manager from April 2004 to December 2015. 32 55
Senior Executive Vice President and    
Deposit, Operations and Fraud Manager    
Robert J. Johnson, Jr. General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Corporate Governance Officer since August 2010. 13 45
Senior Executive Vice President and    
General Counsel, Secretary and      
Chief Corporate Governance Officer      
Brant J. Standridge President, Retail Banking since January 2018. Lending Group Manager from August 2016 to December 2017. Regional President in Texas from January 2015 to August 2016. Regional President in Georgia from November 2011 to December 2014. 19 42
Senior Executive Vice President and     
President, Retail Banking     
David H. Weaver President, Community Banking since December 2016. Community Banking Group Executive from 2010 to December 2016. 22 51
Senior Executive Vice President and     
President, Community Banking     
Dontá L. Wilson Chief Client Experience Officer since August 2016. Regional President in Georgia from December 2014 to July 2016. Regional President in Alabama from August 2009 to November 2014. 19 41
Senior Executive Vice President and     
Chief Client Experience Officer     
W. Rufus Yates President and CEO of BB&T Securities, LLC since January 2009. Financial Services Commercial Finance Manager since 2012. 31 60
Senior Executive Vice President and    
President and CEO of BB&T Securities, LLC    
and Financial Services Commercial Finance    
Manager    

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following discussion sets forth some of the more important risk factors that could materially affect BB&T’s financial condition and operations. When a risk factor spans several risk categories, the below risks have been listed by their primary risk category. Other factors that could affect the Company’s financial condition and operations are discussed in the “Forward-Looking Statements”"Forward-Looking Statements" section above. However, there may be additional risks that are not presently material or known, and factors besides those discussed below, or elsewhere in this or other reports that BB&T filed or furnished with the SEC, that also could adversely affect the Company.

Compliance Risk

Changes in banking laws could have a material adverse effect on BB&T.

BB&T is extensively regulated under federal and state banking laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, federal DIFsthe DIF and the banking system as a whole. In addition, BB&T is subject to changes in federal and state laws as well as changes in banking and credit regulations and governmental economic and monetary policies. Any of these changes could adversely and materially affect BB&T. The current regulatory environment for financial institutions entails significant potential increases in compliance requirements and associated costs, including those related to consumer credit, with a focus on mortgage lending.

Federal and state banking regulators also possess broad powers to take supervisory actions as they deem appropriate. These supervisory actions may result in higher capital requirements, higher deposit insurance premiums and limitations on BB&T’s activities that could have a material adverse effect on its business and profitability.


For example, as discussed in "Regulatory Considerations" above, the FDIC adopted a final rule that imposes a DIF assessment surcharge for banks with total assets of at least $10 billion. The ongoing implementationsurcharge became effective July 1, 2016 and will last for a period currently estimated by the FDIC to be two years but ending no later than December 31, 2018. If the DIF has not reached the required level at that time, then the FDIC will impose a special assessment on institutions with assets greater than $10 billion. The net effect of the new surcharge increased BB&T's total annual assessment by $84 million for 2017.

The Dodd-Frank Act, and its related rulemaking activities, may result in lower revenues, higher costs and ratings downgrades. In addition, failure to meet the FRB’s capital planning and adequacy requirements and liquidity requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act and other banking laws may limit the ability to pay dividends, pursue acquisitions and repurchase common stock.

The Dodd-Frank Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial services industry, addressing, among other things, systemic risk, capital adequacy, deposit insurance assessments, consumer financial protection, interchange fees, derivatives, lending limits, and changes among the bank regulatory agencies. Under Dodd-Frank, BB&T is deemed to be a “systemically important” institution."systemically important" institution subject to certain enhanced prudential standards imposed by the FRB. Federal agencies continue to implement the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. ManyCertain of these provisions remain subject to further rulemaking, guidance and interpretation by the applicable federal regulators, such as the Council, which will regulate the systemic risk of the financial system.regulators. Additionally, the CFPB has finalized a number of significant rules that impact nearly every aspect of the lifecycle of a residential mortgage. These rules implement the Dodd-Frank Act amendments to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. These rules have a direct impact on BB&T’s operations, as BB&T is both a mortgage originator and a servicer.

Due to BB&T’s size, it is subject to additional regulations such as the “living will”"living will" requirements relating to the rapid and orderly resolution of systemically important financial institutions in the event of material financial distress or failure. BB&T cannot predict the additional effects that compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act or any regulations will have on BB&T’s businesses or its ability to pursue future business opportunities. Additional regulations resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may materially adversely affect BB&T’s business, financial condition or results of operations. See “Regulatory Considerations”"Regulatory Considerations" for additional information regarding the Dodd-Frank Act and its impact upon BB&T.

In addition,



BB&T has beenis subject to assessment by the FRB as part of the CCAR program. CCAR is an annual exercise by the FRB to ensure that institutions have forward-lookingenhanced capital planning processes that account for their risksrequirements and sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress. BB&T cannot be certain that the FRB will have no objections to BB&T’s future capital plans submitted through the CCAR program. Failure to pass the CCAR review could adversely affect BB&T’s ability to pay dividends, enter into acquisitions and repurchase common stock.

17

BB&T may be subject to more stringent capital requirements, which could diminish its ability to pay dividends or require BB&T to reduce its operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires federal banking agencies to establish more stringent risk-based capital requirements and leverage limits applicable to banks and BHCs. The FRB approved final rules that established a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations and established a more conservative definition of capital. These requirements, known as Basel III, became effective on January 1, 2015, and as a result, BB&T became subject to enhanced minimum capital and leverage ratios. These requirements, and any other new regulations, including those that have been proposed but not yet implemented as a result of the requirements established by the BCBS, could adversely affect BB&T’s ability to pay dividends or raise capital, or could require BB&T to limit certain business activities, or to raise capital, which may adversely affect its results of operations or financial condition. With approximately $209.9 billion in assets at December 31, 2015, BB&T currently qualifies as a standardized approach banking organization under Basel III. Financial institutions with greater than $250 billion in assets or $10 billion in foreign assets are considered advanced approaches banking organizations, which results inare subject to a more complex calculation of RWA that includes an assessment of the impact of operational risk, among other changes.requirements. BB&T is preparing to comply with the advanced approaches requirements, and these more stringent requirements, or BB&T’s failure to properly comply with them, could materially and adversely impact BB&T’s financial results and regulatory status.status once the requirements become applicable to BB&T. In addition, the costs associated with complying with more stringent capital requirements, such as the requirement to formulate and submit capital plans based on pre-defined stress scenarios on an annual basis, could have a material adverse effect on BB&T. See “Regulatory Considerations”"Regulatory Considerations" for additional information regarding the capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III.

For example, BB&T is subject to assessment by the FRB as part of the CCAR program. CCAR is an annual exercise by the FRB to ensure that institutions have forward-looking capital planning processes that account for their risks and sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress. BB&T cannot be certain that the FRB will have no objections to BB&T’s future capital plans submitted through the CCAR program. Failure to pass the CCAR review could adversely affect BB&T’s ability to pay dividends, enter into acquisitions and repurchase common stock.

BB&T is subject to extensive and expanding government regulation and supervision, which can lead to costly enforcement actions while increasing the cost of doing business and limiting BB&T’s ability to generate revenue.

The financial services industry is facing moresubject to intense scrutiny from bank supervisors in the examination process and more aggressive enforcement of regulations on both the federal and state levels, particularly with respect to mortgage- relatedmortgage-related practices and other consumer compliance matters, andas well as compliance with anti-money laundering, Bank Secrecy Act and Office of Foreign Assets Control efforts, and economic sanctions against certain foreign countries and nationals. Federal banking law grants substantial enforcement powers to federal banking regulators. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess significant civil or criminal monetary penalties, fines, or restitution; to issue cease and desist or removal orders; and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. These enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Failure to comply with these and other regulations, and supervisory expectations related thereto, may result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions, reputation damage or restrictions on business.

In addition, federal bank regulatory agencies are required to consider the effectiveness of a financial institution’s anti-money laundering activities and other regulatory compliance matters when reviewing bank mergers and BHC acquisitions and, consequently, non-compliance with the applicable regulations could materially impair BB&T’s ability to enter into or complete mergers and acquisitions.

Differences


For example, as discussed in "Regulatory Considerations" above, Branch Bank entered into a consent order with the FDIC and the NCCOB in December 2016 and BB&T entered into a cease and desist order with the FRB and NCCOB in January 2017. The orders call for corrective actions and enhancements to address certain internal control deficiencies within the BSA/AML Compliance Program. BB&T’s and Branch Bank’s ability to pursue mergers and acquisitions may be limited for a period of time.
In addition, during 2014, BB&T received notice from the HUD-OIG that BB&T had been selected for an audit/survey to assess BB&T's compliance with FHA loan origination and quality control requirements. BB&T subsequently received subpoenas from the HUD-OIG and the Department of Justice seeking additional information regarding its lending practices in connection with loans insured by the FHA. During 2014, BB&T recognized an $85 million charge that was included in other expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. During 2016, the Company paid $83 million to settle these matters pursuant to an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Issuance of new tax guidance or differences in interpretation of tax laws and regulations and any potential resulting litigation may adversely impact BB&T’s financial statements.

Local, state or federal tax authorities may interpret tax laws, including the recently issued Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and regulations differently than BB&T and challenge tax positions that BB&T has taken on its tax returns. This may result in differences in the treatment of revenues, deductions or credits and/or differences in the timing of these items. The differences in treatment may result in payment of additional taxes, interest or penalties that could have a material adverse effect on BB&T’sfinancial results. For example, as discussed in Note 12 “Income Taxes” in the “NotesPotential litigation related to Consolidated Financial Statements,” during 2010, BB&T received an IRS statutory notice of deficiency for tax years 2002-2007 asserting a liability for taxes, penalties and interest of approximately $892 million. Related developments resulted in a $516 million charge during 2013. Potential developments in BB&T’s litigation or in similar cases could adversely affect BB&T’s financial position or results of operations.

18

Credit Risk

Changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and deterioration in the geographic and financial markets in which BB&T operates could lead to higher loan charge-offs and reduce BB&T’s net income and growth.

BB&T’s business is subject to periodic fluctuations based on national, regional and local economic conditions, as well as conditions that may be specific to particular sectors or industries. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on BB&T’s operations and financial condition even if other favorable events occur. BB&T’s banking operations are primarily locally oriented and community-based. Accordingly, BB&T expects to continue to be dependent upon local business conditions as well as conditions in the local residential and CRE markets it serves. For example, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values or increases in interest rates, as well as other factors, could weaken the economies of the communities BB&T serves. Weakness in BB&T’s market area could depress its earnings and consequently its financial condition because:

·customers may not want or need BB&T’s products or services;
·borrowers may not be able or willing to repay their loans;
·the value of the collateral securing loans to borrowers may decline; and
·the quality of BB&T’s loan portfolio may decline.

customers may not want or need BB&T’s products or services;
borrowers may not be able or willing to repay their loans;
the value of the collateral securing loans to borrowers may decline; and
the quality of BB&T’s loan portfolio may decline.

Any of the latter three scenarios could require BB&T to charge off a higher percentage of loans and/or increase provisions for credit losses, which would reduce BB&T’s net income. Credit deterioration, combined with flat to declining real estate values, would result in increased loan charge-offs and higher provisions for credit losses, which may negatively impact BB&T’s net income. For example, as of December 31, 2015, loan balancesrelated to the oil and gas industryrepresented approximately 1% of our total loan portfolio. This amountgenerallyconsists of loansforoilfield services,oil and gasexploration and production, and pipeline transportation of gas and crude oil. Beginning in late 2014, oil prices began declining, which has had an adverse effect on some of our borrowers in this portfolio and on the value of the collateral securing some of these loans. If such downturn in the oil and gas industry continues, the cash flows of our customers in this industry could be adversely impacted, which could impair their ability to service any loans outstanding to them and/or reduce demand for loans. These factors could result in higher delinquencies and greater charge-offs in future periods, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

A systemic lack of available credit, a lack of confidence in the financial sector, volatility in the financial markets and/or reduced business activity could materially adversely affect BB&T’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Potential downgrades of U.S. government securities by one or more of the credit ratings agencies could have a material adverse effect on BB&T’s operations, earnings and financial condition.

A possible future downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government and a decline in the perceived creditworthiness of U.S. government-related obligations could impact BB&T’s ability to obtain funding that is collateralized by affected instruments, as well as affect the pricing of that funding when it is available. A downgrade may also adversely affect the market value of such instruments. BB&T cannot predict if, when or how any changes to the credit ratings or perceived creditworthiness of these organizationsobligations will affect economic conditions. Such ratings actions could result in a significant adverse impact on BB&T. For example, BB&T’s securities portfolio consists largely of MBS issued by GSEs, such as FHLMC and FNMA. Among other things, a further downgrade in the U.S. government’s credit rating could adversely impact the value of these securities and may trigger requirements that the Company post additional collateral for trades relative to these securities. A downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government or the credit ratings of related institutions, agencies or instruments would significantly exacerbate the other risks to which BB&T is subject and any related adverse effects on theits business, financial condition and results of operations.


The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect BB&T.

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. BB&T has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and BB&T and certain of its subsidiaries routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds and other institutions. Many of these transactions expose BB&T to credit risk in the event of default of its counterparty. In addition, BB&T’s credit risk may be exacerbated when collateral is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure. These types of losses could materially and adversely affect BB&T’s results of operations or financial condition.

19


BB&T could be affected by the United Kingdom’s eventual withdrawal from the European Union.

In June 2016, the United Kingdom held a non-binding referendum in which a majority of voters voted in favor of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (commonly referred to as “Brexit”). On March 29, 2017, the United Kingdom formally notified the European Union of its intention to withdraw pursuant to the Treaty on European Union. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union will take effect either when agreed upon or, in the absence of such an agreement, two years after the United Kingdom provided its notice of withdrawal. It appears likely that this withdrawal will involve a process of lengthy negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union member states to determine the terms of the withdrawal as well as the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union going forward. The ultimate impact of Brexit and its effects on BB&T still remain uncertain and will depend on the terms of withdrawal and the post-Brexit relationships that the United Kingdom will negotiate with the European Union and other nations that are not a part of the European Union. Increased market volatility and further global economic deterioration resulting from Brexit, or concern about Brexit, could have significant adverse effects on BB&T's businesses, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital. In addition, specific impacts from Brexit could include requirements that BB&T make certain changes to its operational model, business practices and regulatory authorizations in order to continue servicing customers across Europe; detrimental impacts on revenues and expenses; increased difficulties related to recruitment, retention, and mobility of certain European-based associates; and other adverse impacts on business operations. 

Liquidity Risk

BB&T’s liquidity could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets, an unforeseen outflow of cash or a reduction in the credit ratings for BB&T or its subsidiaries.

Liquidity is essential to BB&T’s businesses. When volatility or disruptions occur in the capital markets, BB&T’s ability to access capital could be materially impaired. Additionally, other factors outside of BB&T’s control, such as a general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties, could impair BB&T’s ability to access capital markets or create an unforeseen outflow of cash or deposits. BB&T’s inability to access the capital markets could constrain its ability to make new loans toor meet its existing lending commitments and could ultimately jeopardize its overall liquidity and capitalization.

BB&T’s credit ratings are also important to its liquidity. Rating agencies regularly evaluate BB&T and its subsidiaries, and their ratings are based on a number of factors, including the financial strength of BB&T and its subsidiaries, as well as factors not entirely within BB&T’s control, including conditions affecting the financial services industry generally. As a result, there can be no assurance that BB&T will maintain its current ratings. A reduction in BB&T’s credit ratings could adversely affect BB&T’s liquidity and competitive position, increase its borrowing costs, limit its access to the capital markets or trigger unfavorable contractual obligations.

Market Risk

Turmoil

Instability in economic conditions and geopolitical matters as well as volatility in global financial markets could have a material adverse effect on BB&T’s operations, earnings and financial condition.

The macroeconomic environment in the United States is susceptible to global events and volatility. The negative impact on economic conditions and global markets from foreign sovereign debt matters and other matters could adversely affect BB&T’s business, financial condition and liquidity. Global conflictsDomestic and global political activity, geopolitical matters, including international political unrest or disturbances, concerns over energy prices and economic instability or recession in certain regions could cause turmoil and volatility in the financial markets, which could reduce the value of BB&T’s assets or cause a reduction in liquidity that adversely impacts BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations.

The monetary, tax and other policies of governmental agencies, including the FRB, have a significant impact on market interest rates, and BB&T’s business and financial performance is impacted significantly by such interest rates.

BB&T’s businesses and earnings are affected by the fiscal and other policies adopted by various regulatory authorities of the U.S., non-U.S. governments and international agencies. The FRB regulates the supply of money and credit in the U.S. The federal policies determine in large part the cost of funds for lending and investing and the return earned on those loans and investments. The market impact from such policies can also materially decrease the value of certain of BB&T’s financial assets, most notably debt securities. Changes in the federal policies are beyond BB&T’s control and, consequently, the impact of these changes on BB&T’s activities and results of operations is difficult to predict.


Changes in interest rates may have an adverse effect on BB&T’s profitability.

BB&T’s earnings and financial condition are largely dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned from loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The narrowing of interest rate spreads could adversely affect BB&T’s earnings and financial condition. BB&T cannot control or predict with certainty changes in interest rates. Regional and local economic conditions, competitive pressures and the policies of regulatory authorities, including monetary policies of the FRB, affect interest income and interest expense. As discussed in “Market"Market Risk Management – Interest Rate Market Risk (Other than Trading)," BB&T has ongoing policies and procedures designed to manage the risks associated with changes in market interest rates. However, changes in interest rates still may have an adverse effect on BB&T’s profitability. For example, rising interest rates could adversely affect BB&T’s mortgage banking business because higher interest rates could cause customers to apply for fewer mortgages. Similarly, rising interest rates would increase the required periodic payment for variable rate loans and may result in borrowers becoming unable to pay. Additionally, rising interest rates may increase the cost of BB&T’s deposits, which are a primary source of funding. BB&T is also subject to the risk of a negative interest rate scenario, which implies that a depositor would pay a premium for a financial institution to hold funds on deposit. In such a scenario, some depositors may choose to withdraw their deposits in lieu of paying an interest rate to BB&T to hold such deposits. Negative rates would also diminish the spreads on loans and securities. This scenario could have a material adverse effect on BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations. While BB&T actively manages against these risks through hedging

On July 27, 2017, the Chief Executive of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR rates after 2021. In the U.S., efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee of the FRB and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of the Financial Conduct Authority announcement or other risk mitigation strategies, ifregulatory changes or announcements, any establishment of alternative reference rates or any other reforms to LIBOR that may be enacted in the United Kingdom, the United States or elsewhere. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect BB&T’s assumptions regarding borrower behavior are wrong or overall economic conditions are significantly different than anticipated, the Company’s risk mitigation techniques may be insufficient.

financial condition and results of operations.


Loss of deposits or a change in deposit mix could increase the Company’s funding costs.

Deposits are a low cost and stable source of funding. BB&T competes with banks and other financial institutions for deposits. Funding costs may increase because the Company may lose deposits and replace them with more expensive sources of funding, clients may shift their deposits into higher cost products or the Company may need to raise its interest rates to avoid losing deposits. Higher funding costs reduce the Company’s NIM, net interest income and net income.

20

Operational Risk

BB&T faces cybersecurity risks including “denial of service attacks,” “hacking” and “identity theft” that could result in the disruption of operations or the disclosure of confidential information, adversely affect BB&T’s business or reputation and create significant legal and financial exposure.

BB&T’s computer systems and network infrastructure are subject to security risks and could be susceptible to cyber attacks, such as denial of service attacks, hacking, terrorist activities or identity theft. Financial services institutions and companies engaged in data processing have reported breaches in the security of their websites or other systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems, often through the introduction of computer viruses or malware, cyber attacks and other means.Denial of service attacks have been launched against a number of large financial services institutions, including BB&T. NoneAs a result of these events resulted in a breach of BB&T’s client data or account information; however,attacks, the performance of BB&T’s website,www.bbt.comBBT.com, was adversely affected, and in some instances customers were prevented from accessing BB&T’s website. BB&T expects to be subject to similar attacks in the future. While events to date primarily resulted in inconvenience, future cyber attacks could be more disruptive and damaging. Hacking and identity theft risks, in particular, could cause serious reputational harm. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and BB&T may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks. BB&T may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize these risks and could be held liable for any security breach or loss.

Despite efforts to ensure the integrity of its systems, BB&T will not be able to anticipate all security breaches of these types, and BB&T may not be able to implement effective preventive measures against such security breaches. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently and can originate from a wide variety of sources, including outside groups such as external service providers, organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. Those parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees,associates, customers or other users of BB&T’s systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to its data or that of its clients. These risks may increase in the future as the Company continues to increase its mobile-payment and other internet-based product offerings and expands its internal usage of web-based products and applications.


A successful penetration or circumvention of system security could cause serious negative consequences to BB&T, including disruption of operations, misappropriation of confidential information of BB&T or its customers, or damage to computer systems of BB&T or its customers and counterparties. A security breach could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to BB&T or to its customers, loss of confidence in BB&T’s security measures, significant litigation exposure and harm to BB&T’s reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect.

BB&T relies on its employees,associates, systems and certain counterparties, and certain failures could materially adversely affect operations.

BB&T’s business is dependent on the ability to process, record and monitor a large number of complex transactions. The Company could be materially adversely affected if one or more of its employeesassociates causes a significant operational breakdown or failure, either as a result of human error or intentionally. Financial, accounting or other data processing systems may fail or have other significant shortcomings that materially adversely affect BB&T’s business. BB&T’s systems may not be able to handle certain scenarios, such as a negative interest rate environment. In addition, products, services and processes are continually changing and BB&T may not fully identify new operational risks that may arise from such changes. Any of these occurrences could diminish the ability to operate one or more BUs or result in potential liability to clients, increased operating expenses, higher litigation costs (including fines and sanctions), reputational damage, regulatory intervention or weaker competitive standing, any of which could be material to the Company.

If personal, confidential or proprietary information of clients were to be mishandled or misused, significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage and financial loss could occur. Such mishandling or misuse could include circumstances where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either through the fault of systems, employees,associates, or counterparties, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise inappropriately taken by third parties.

21

BB&T may be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, which may include, for example, security breaches; electrical or telecommunications outages; failures of computer servers or other damage to property or assets; natural disasters; health emergencies or pandemics; or events arising from political events, including terrorist acts. There can be no assurance that disaster recovery or other plans will fully mitigate all potential business continuity risks. Any failures or disruptions of systems or operations could impact BB&T’s ability to service its clients, which could adversely affect BB&T’s results of operations by subjecting BB&T to losses, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties or by requiring the expenditure of significant resources to correct the failure or disruption.

Significant litigation and regulatory proceedings could have a material adverse effect on BB&T.

BB&T faces legal riskssignificant litigation and regulatory proceedings in its business, and thebusiness. The volume of claims and amount of damages and penalties claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remains high. SubstantialGiven the inherent uncertainties involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings, and the very large or indeterminate damages sought in some matters asserted against BB&T, there can be significant uncertainty as to the ultimate liability BB&T may incur from such matters. The finding, or even the assertion, of substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against BB&T may have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to BB&T, which in turn could seriously harm BB&T’s business prospects.

BB&T faces significant operational and other risks related to its activities, which could expose it to negative publicity, litigation and/or regulatory action.

BB&T is exposed to many types of risks, including operational reputational,risks, legal and compliance risk, the risk ofinternal or external fraud or theft by employees or outsiders (including identity and information theft), unauthorized transactions by employees or operationaltransaction processing errors includingdue to clerical or record-keeping errorsmistakes or those resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems. Negative public opinion can result from BB&T’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance and acquisitions, activities related to asset sales and balance sheet management and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect BB&T’s ability to attract and keep customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

Because the nature of the financial services businessindustry involves a high volume of transactions, certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. BB&T’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume may further increase the risk that technical flaws or employeeassociate tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. BB&T also may be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. BB&T is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is BB&T) and to the risk that BB&T’s (or its vendors’) business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.


BB&T relies on other companies to provide certain key components of its business infrastructure.

Third party vendors provide certain key components of BB&T’s business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and mutual fund distribution.certain transaction processing. While BB&T has selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their operations. Any failure by these third parties to perform or provide agreed upon goods and services for any reason, or their poor performance of services, could adversely affect BB&T’s ability to deliver products and services to its customers and otherwise conduct its business. Replacing these third party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense.

BB&T may not be able to successfully integrate bank or nonbank mergers and acquisitions.

Difficulties may arise in the integration of the business and operations of BHCs, banks and other nonbanknon-bank entities that BB&T acquires and, as a result, BB&T may not be able to achieve the cost savings and synergies that it expects will result from such transactions. Achieving cost savings is dependent on consolidating certain operational and functional areas, eliminating duplicative positions and terminating certain agreements for outside services. Additional operational savings are dependent upon the integration of the acquired or merged entity’s businesses with BB&T or one of BB&T’s subsidiaries, the conversion of core operating systems, data systems and products and the standardization of business practices. Complications or difficulties in the conversion of core operating systems, data systems and products may result in the loss of customers, damage to BB&T’s reputation within the financial services industry, operational problems, one-time costs currently not anticipated or reduced cost savings resulting from such mergers or acquisitions. Annual cost savings in each such transaction may be materially less than anticipated if the holding company, bank merger or nonbank merger or acquisition is delayed unexpectedly, the integration of operations is delayed beyond what is anticipated or the conversion to a single set of data systems is not accomplished on a timely basis.

22

Difficulty in integrating an acquired company may prevent BB&T from realizing expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence and/or other projected benefits from the acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition, loss of key employees,associates, disruption of BB&T’s businesses or the businesses of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect BB&T’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employeesassociates or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Also, the negative effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected. As a result of these and other factors, BB&T could incur losses on acquired assets and increased expenses resulting from the failure to successfully integrate an acquired company, which could adversely impact its financial condition or results of operations.

BB&T may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect BB&T’s business operations and profitability.

BB&T invests significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. BB&T may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact the ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could result in sanctions from regulatory authorities. Such sanctions could include fines and suspension of trading in BB&T stock, among others. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations.

Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in impairment charges that adversely impact BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components. In addition, BB&T may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

There are risks resulting from the extensive use of models in BB&T’s business.

BB&T relies on quantitative models to measure risks and to estimate certain financial values. Models may be used in such processes as determining the pricing of various products, grading loans and extending credit, measuring interest rate and other market risks, predicting or estimating losses, assessing capital adequacy and calculating economic and regulatory capital levels, as well as to estimate the value of financial instruments and balance sheet items. Poorly designed or implemented models present the risk that BB&T’s business decisions based on information incorporating model output would be adversely affected due to the inadequacy of that information. Also, information BB&T provides to the public or to its regulators based on poorly designed or implemented models could be inaccurate or misleading. Some of the decisions that the regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to BB&T’s shareholders, could be affected adversely due to the perception that the quality of the models used to generate the relevant information is insufficient.


BB&T’s risk management measures may not be fully effective.
Management of risk, including compliance, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation and strategic risks, requires policies and procedures to properly record and verify a large number of transactions and events. BB&T’s risk management measures may not be fully effective in identifying and mitigating its risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, including risks that are unidentified or unanticipated, even if the models for assessing risk are properly designed and implemented. Some of BB&T’s methods of managing risk are based upon its use of observed historical market behavior and management's judgment. These methods may not accurately predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than the historical measures indicate. In addition, credit risk is inherent in the financial services business. BB&T’s ability to assess the creditworthiness of its customers may be impaired if the models and approaches it uses to select, manage and underwrite consumer and commercial customers become less predictive of future charge-offs.

BB&T's set of risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques, and the judgments that accompany their application, cannot anticipate every economic and financial outcome or the timing of such outcomes. BB&T may, therefore, incur losses in the course of its risk management or investing activities.

Strategic and Other Risk

BB&T may experience significant competition from new or existing competitors, which may reduce its customer base or cause it to lower prices for its products and services in order to maintain market share.


There is intense competition among commercial banks in BB&T’s market area. In addition, BB&T competes with other providers of financial services, such as savings and loan associations, credit unions, consumer finance companies, securities firms, insurance companies, commercial finance and leasing companies, the mutual funds industry, full-service brokerage firms and discount brokerage firms, some of which are subject to less extensive regulations than BB&T is with respect to the products and services they provide. BB&T’s success depends, in part, on its ability to adapt its products and services to evolving industry standards and customer expectations. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices. Lower prices can reduce BB&T’s NIM and revenues from its fee-based products and services.

In addition, the adoption of new technologies by competitors, including internet banking services, mobile phone applications and advanced ATM functionality could require BB&T to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt its existing products and services. Also, theseThese and other capital investments in BB&T’s business may not produce expected growth in earnings anticipated at the time of the expenditure. BB&T may not be successful in introducing new products and services, achieving market acceptance of its products and services, anticipating or reacting to consumers’ changing technological preferences or developing and maintaining loyal customers. In addition, BB&T could lose market share to the shadow banking system or other non-traditional banking organizations.

Some of BB&T’s larger competitors, including certain national banks that have a significant presence in BB&T’s market area, may have greater capital and resources than BB&T, may have higher lending limits and may offer products and services not offered by BB&T.

Any potential adverse reactions to BB&T’s financial condition or status in the marketplace, as compared to its competitors, could limit BB&T’s ability to attract and retain customers and to compete for new business opportunities. The inability to attract and retain customers or to effectively compete for new business may have a material and adverse effect on BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations.

23

BB&T also experiences competition from nonbank companies inside and outside of its market area and, in some cases, from companies other than those traditionally considered financial sector participants. In particular, technology companies have begun to focus on the financial sector and offer software and products primarily over the Internet, with an increasing focus on mobile device delivery. These companies generally are not subject to the comparable regulatory burdens as financial institutions and may accordingly realize certain cost savings and offer products and services at more favorable rates and with greater convenience to the customer. For example, a number of companies offer bill pay and funds transfer services that allow customers to avoid using a bank. Technology companies are generally positioned and structured to quickly adapt to technological advances and directly focus resources on implementing those advances. This competition could result in the loss of fee income and customer deposits and related income. In addition, changes in consumer spending and saving habits could adversely affect BB&T’s operations, and the Company may be unable to develop competitive and timely new products and services in response. As the pace of technology and change advance, continuous innovation is expected to exert long-term pressure on the financial services industry.


BB&T may not be able to complete future acquisitions.

BB&T must generally satisfy a number of meaningful conditions before it can complete an acquisition of another bank or BHC, including federal and/or state regulatory approvals. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank or BHC acquisition, bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, financial condition and future prospects, including current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience and integrity of management and record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the CRA, the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities and protests from various stakeholders of both BB&T and its acquisition partner. Also, under the Dodd-Frank Act, U.S. regulators must now take systemic risk into account when evaluating whether to approve a potential acquisition transaction involving a large financial institution like BB&T. BB&T cannot be certain when or if, or on what terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. In specific cases, BB&T may be required to sell banks or branches, or take other actions as a condition to receiving regulatory approval. An inability to satisfy other conditions necessary to consummate an acquisition transaction, such as third-party litigation, a judicial order blocking the transaction or lack of shareholder approval, could also prevent BB&T from completing an announced acquisition.

Catastrophic weather-related events and other natural disasters could have a material adverse effect on BB&T.

The occurrence of catastrophic events such as hurricanes, tropical storms, tornados, winter storms and other large scale catastrophes could adversely affect BB&T’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. BB&T has operations and customers along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts as well as other parts of the southeastern United States, whichStates. Such areas could be adversely impacted by hurricanessuch events in those regions, the nature and severity of which may be impacted by climate change and are difficult to predict. These and other severe weather in those regions. Unpredictableunpredictable natural and other disasters could have an adverse effect on BB&T in that such events could materially disrupt its operations or the ability or willingness of its customers to access the financial services offered by BB&T. Although BB&T carries insurance to mitigate its exposure to certain catastrophicThese events these events could nevertheless reduce BB&T’s earnings and cause volatility in its financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and have a material adverse effect on BB&T’s financial condition and/or results of operations.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

BB&T leases its headquarters at 200 West Second Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101 and owns or leases other significant office space in the vicinity of its headquarters. BB&T owns or leases free-standing operations centers, with its primary operations and information technology centers located in various locations in the southeasternSoutheastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. Offices are either owned or operated under long-term leases. BB&T operates retail branches and other offices in a number of states, primarily concentrated in the southeasternSoutheastern and mid-AtlanticMid-Atlantic United States. See Table 1 for a list of BB&T’s branches by state. BB&T also operates numerous insurance agencies and other businesses that occupy facilities.facilities throughout the U.S. and Canada. Management believes that the premises are well-located and suitably equipped to serve as financial services facilities. See Note 5 “Premises"Note 4. Premises and Equipment” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this reportEquipment" for additional disclosures related to properties and other fixed assets.


24
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

BB&T’s common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “BBT.”"BBT." The common stock was held by approximately 384,000480,000 shareholders and 450,000 shareholders at December 31, 2015 compared to approximately 346,000 shareholders at December 31, 2014.2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table sets forth the quarterly high, and low trading prices and closing sales prices for BB&T’s common stock and the cash dividends declared per share of common stock for each of the last eight quarters.

Table 4
Quarterly Summary of Market Prices and Cash Dividends Declared on Common Stock
                              
      2015 2014 
               Cash          Cash 
      Sales Prices Dividends Sales Prices Dividends 
      High Low Close Declared High Low Close Declared 
 Quarter Ended:                        
  March 31$ 40.17  $ 34.95  $ 38.99  $ 0.24  $ 41.04  $ 36.28  $ 40.17  $ 0.23  
  June 30  41.70    37.33    40.31    0.27    40.95    36.38    39.43    0.24  
  September 30  41.90    34.73    35.60    0.27    40.21    35.86    37.21    0.24  
  December 31  39.47    34.24    37.81    0.27    39.69    34.50    38.89    0.24  
   Year$ 41.90  $ 34.24  $ 37.81  $ 1.05  $ 41.04  $ 34.50  $ 38.89  $ 0.95  

two years.

Table 2
Quarterly Summary of Market Prices and Cash Dividends Declared on Common Stock
     
  2017 2016
  Sales Prices Cash Dividends Declared Sales Prices Cash Dividends Declared
  High Low Close  High Low Close 
Quarter Ended:                
March 31 $49.88
 $42.73
 $44.70
 $0.30
 $37.03
 $29.95
 $33.27
 $0.27
June 30 46.50
 41.17
 45.41
 0.30
 37.02
 32.22
 35.61
 0.28
September 30 48.90
 43.03
 46.94
 0.33
 38.81
 33.72
 37.72
 0.30
December 31 51.11
 44.62
 49.72
 0.33
 47.85
 37.40
 47.02
 0.30
Year 51.11
 41.17
 49.72
 $1.26
 47.85
 29.95
 47.02
 $1.15

The stock price reached an all-time high during the first quarter of 2018.


Common Stock, Dividends and Share Repurchases

BB&T’s ability to pay dividends is primarily dependent on earnings from operations, the adequacy of capital and the availability of liquid assets for distribution and is subject to the FRB not objecting to its capital plan. BB&T’s ability to generate liquid assets for distribution is dependent on the ability of Branch Bank to pay dividends to the Parent Company. The payment of cash dividends is an integral part of providing a competitive return on shareholders’ investments. The Company’s policy is to accomplish this while retaining sufficient capital to support future growth and to meet regulatory requirements. Management has established a guideline that the common dividend payout ratio (computed by dividing common stock dividends by net income available to common shareholders) will be between 30% and 50% and the total payout ratio (including dividends and share repurchases) will be between 30% and 80% of basic EPS during normal economic conditions. BB&T’s common dividend payout ratio computed by dividing dividends declared per common share by basic EPS, was 40.5%45.3% in 20152017 compared to 34.4%40.9% in 2014.2016 and 40.8% in 2015. BB&T has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1903. BB&T expects common dividend declarations, if declared, to occur in January, April, July and October with payment dates on or about the first of March, June, September and December. A discussion of dividend restrictions is included in Note 15 “Regulatory"Note 14. Regulatory Requirements and Other Restrictions” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Restrictions" and in the “Regulatory Considerations”"Regulatory Considerations" section.

Share Repurchases

BB&T has periodically repurchased shares of its own common stock. In accordance with North Carolina law, repurchased shares cannot be held as treasury stock, but revert to the status of authorized and unissued shares upon repurchase.

The Board of Directors had previously granted authority under the 2006 Repurchase Plan for the repurchase of up to 50 million shares of BB&T’s common stock. No shares were repurchased in connection with the 2006 Repurchase Plan during 2015, 2014, or 2013.

During June 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a new plan, the 2015 Repurchase Plan, to repurchase up to 50 million shares of the Company’s common stock. Repurchases under the 2015 Repurchase Plan may be effected through open market purchases, or privately negotiated transactions.transactions, trading plans established in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules or other means. The timing and exact amount of repurchases will be consistent with the Company’sCompany's capital plan and subject to various factors, including the Company’sCompany's capital position, liquidity, financial performance, alternative uses of capital, stock trading price and general market conditions, and may be suspended at any time. The 2015 Repurchase Plan replacesShares repurchased constitute authorized but unissued shares of the 2006 Repurchase PlanCompany and does not have a specified termination date. Noare therefore available for future issuances. During 2017, the Company repurchased 35.5 million shares wereof common stock totaling $1.6 billion.


Management's guideline for the total payout ratio (computed by dividing the sum of common stock dividends declared and share repurchases, excluding shares repurchased in connection with theequity awards, by net income available to common shareholders) is that it will range between 30% and 80% during normal economic conditions. BB&T may consider higher total distributions based on its capital position, earnings and prevailing economic conditions. The total payout ratio was 117.9%, 64.0% and 40.8% in 2017, 2016 and 2015, Repurchase Plan during 2015.

respectively.
Table 3
Share Repurchase Activity
         
(shares in thousands) Total Shares Repurchased (1) Average Price Paid Per Share Total Shares Purchased Pursuant to Publicly-Announced Plan (2) Maximum Remaining Dollar Value of Shares Available for Repurchase Pursuant to Publicly-Announced Plan
October 2017 5,477
 $48.12
 5,477
 $696
November 2017 2,296
 47.53
 2,296
 640
December 2017 
 
 
 640
Total 7,773
 47.95
 7,773
  
25
(1)Excludes commissions.
(2)Pursuant to the 2017 Repurchase Plan, announced on June 28, 2017, authorizing up to $1.88 billion of share repurchases over a one-year period ending June 30, 2018. In November 2017, the amount authorized was increased $53 million to $1.93 billion for the same one-year period.

Table 5
Share Repurchase Activity
              
            Maximum Remaining 
            Number of Shares 
     Total  Average Total Shares Repurchased Available for Repurchase 
     Shares  Price Paid Pursuant to Pursuant to 
     Repurchased (1)  Per Share (2) Publicly-Announced Plan Publicly-Announced Plan 
              
     (shares in thousands) 
 October 2015 9  $ 35.42   ―     50,000  
 November 2015 3    37.78   ―     50,000  
 December 2015 12    37.42   ―     50,000  
  Total 24    36.69   ―      
              
              
(1)Repurchases reflect shares exchanged or surrendered in connection with the exercise of equity-based awards under BB&T’s equity-based compensation plans.
(2)Excludes commissions.

Preferred Stock

See Note 10 “Shareholders’ Equity” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”"Note 9. Shareholders' Equity" for information about BB&T’s preferred stock.


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information concerning securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding equity-based awards the weighted average price of such awards and the securities remaining available for future issuance as of December 31, 2015.

 Table 6 
 Equity Compensation Plan Information 
                  
      (a)(1) (b)(2) (c)(3) 
      Number of securities Weighted-average Number of securities remaining 
      to be issued upon exercise price of available for future issuance 
      exercise of outstanding outstanding options, under equity compensation plans 
 Plan Category options, warrants and rights warrants and rights (excluding securities reflected in (a)) 
 Approved by security holders   32,215,501   $ 34.89     22,015,930   
 Not approved by security holders   ―       ―       ―     
  Total   32,215,501     34.89     22,015,930   
                  
                  
(1)Includes 11,638,316 RSUs.
(2)Excludes RSUs because they do not have an exercise price.
(3)All awards remaining available for future issuance will be issued under the terms of the 2012 Incentive Plan.

2017:
Table 4
Equity Compensation Plan Information
       
Plan Category 
(a)(1)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
(b)(2)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
(c)(3)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in (a))
Approved by security holders 18,474,088
 $30.88 19,408,161
Not approved by security holders (4) 
  
Total 18,474,088
 30.88 19,408,161
26
(1)Includes 12,521,571 RSUs and PSUs.
(2)Excludes RSUs and PSUs because they do not have an exercise price.
(3)All awards remaining available for future issuance will be issued under the terms of the 2012 Incentive Plan, as amended.
(4)Excludes 195,933 options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $31.40 for plans that BB&T will not make future awards under and were assumed in mergers and acquisitions.

Performance Graph

Set forth below areGraphs

The following graphs comparingcompare the cumulative total returns (assuming concurrent $100 investments at the beginning of each period and reinvestment of dividends) of BB&T common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and an industry Peer Group.peer group. The companies in the Peer Grouppeer group were Comerica Incorporated, Fifth-Third Bancorp, Huntington Bancshares, Incorporated, KeyCorp, M&T Bank Corporation, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Regions Financial Corporation, SunTrust Banks, Inc., U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo & Company and Zions Bancorporation.



  As of / Through December 31, 10 Year Cumulative Total Return Through 12/31/2017(1)
  Invested Cumulative Total Return 

 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 
BB&T Corporation $100.00
 $132.72
 $141.87
 $141.73
 $182.08
 $197.88
 $228.92
S&P 500 Index 100.00
 132.38
 150.49
 152.55
 170.79
 208.06
 225.85
BB&T's Peer Group 100.00
 136.23
 161.16
 162.89
 189.90
 217.45
 217.40
27
(1)The 10 year cumulative total return assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2007

TableofContents

                               
*$100 invested on December 31, 1995, 2005 or 2010, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ended December 31.
                               
    Cumulative Total Return Through December 31,    Cumulative Total Return 
    2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015    Through December 31, 2015 
    $100 Invested December 31, 2010    10 Year 20 Year 
 BB&T Corporation$ 100.00  $ 98.12  $ 116.35  $ 154.41  $ 165.06  $ 164.90     $ 130.13  $ 561.66  
 S&P 500 Index  100.00    102.11    118.43    156.77    178.22    180.67       202.41    481.73  
 BB&T’s Peer Group  100.00    88.66    108.49    147.24    164.75    164.96       118.28    388.14  

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
   
  As of/ For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Summary Income Statement:          
Revenue-TE (1) $11,476
 $10,953

$9,757
 $9,373
 $9,798
Less: TE adjustment (2) 159
 160
 146
 143
 146
Revenue-reported (1) 11,317
 10,793
 9,611
 9,230
 9,652
Provision for credit losses 547
 572
 428
 251
 592
Noninterest expense 7,444
 6,721
 6,266
 5,852
 5,777
Income before income taxes 3,326

3,500

2,917

3,127

3,283
Provision for income taxes 911
 1,058
 794
 921
 1,553
Net income 2,415

2,442

2,123

2,206

1,730
Noncontrolling interest 21
 16
 39
 75
 50
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock 174
 167
 148
 148
 117
Net income available to common shareholders 2,220

2,259

1,936

1,983

1,563
           
Per Common Share:      
  
  
Basic EPS $2.78
 $2.81
 $2.59
 $2.76
 $2.22
Diluted EPS 2.74
 2.77
 2.56
 2.72
 2.19
Cash dividends declared 1.26
 1.15
 1.05
 0.95
 0.92
Common equity 34.01
 33.14
 31.66
 30.09
 28.48
           
Average Balances:      
  
  
Total assets $221,065
 $218,945
 $197,347
 $185,095
 $181,282
Securities (3) 46,029
 46,279
 42,103
 40,541
 36,772
Loans and leases (4) 144,075
 141,759
 127,802
 118,830
 117,527
Deposits 159,241
 157,469
 138,498
 129,077
 128,555
Long-term debt 21,660
 22,791
 23,343
 22,210
 19,301
Shareholders' equity 30,001
 29,355
 25,871
 23,954
 21,860
           
Period-End Balances:          
Total assets $221,642
 $219,276
 $209,947
 $186,834
 $183,043
Securities (3) 47,574
 43,606
 43,827
 41,147
 40,205
Loans and leases (4) 144,800
 145,038
 136,986
 121,307
 117,139
Deposits 157,371
 160,234
 149,124
 129,040
 127,475
Long-term debt 23,648
 21,965
 23,769
 23,312
 21,493
Shareholders' equity 29,695
 29,926
 27,340
 24,377
 22,780
           
Selected Ratios:          
NIM 3.46% 3.39% 3.32% 3.42% 3.68%
Rate of return on:          
Average total assets 1.09
 1.12
 1.08
 1.19
 0.95
Average common equity 8.25
 8.57
 8.34
 9.32
 8.07
Average total shareholders' equity 8.05
 8.32
 8.21
 9.21
 7.91
Average total shareholders' equity to average total assets 13.57
 13.41
 13.11
 12.94
 12.06
28
(1)Revenue is defined as net interest income plus noninterest income.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)
                       
    As of/ For the Year Ended December 31,
    2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
Summary Income Statement:                   
 Interest income$ 6,473   $ 6,286   $ 6,654   $ 7,068   $ 7,035  
 Interest expense  735     769     892     1,062     1,381  
  Net interest income-taxable equivalent  5,738     5,517     5,762     6,006     5,654  
 Noninterest income  4,019     3,856     4,036     3,973     3,217  
  Revenue-taxable equivalent  9,757     9,373     9,798     9,979     8,871  
 Less: taxable equivalent adjustment  146     143     146     149     147  
 Provision for credit losses  428     251     592     1,057     1,190  
 Noninterest expense  6,266     5,852     5,777     5,828     5,802  
 Income before income taxes  2,917     3,127     3,283     2,945     1,732  
 Provision for income taxes  794     921     1,553     892     384  
 Net income  2,123     2,206     1,730     2,053     1,348  
 Noncontrolling interest  39     75     50     49     43  
 Dividends and accretion on preferred stock  148     148     117     63     ―    
 Net income available to common shareholders  1,936     1,983     1,563     1,941     1,305  
                       
Per Common Share:                   
 Earnings:                   
  Basic$ 2.59   $ 2.76   $ 2.22   $ 2.78   $ 1.87  
  Diluted  2.56     2.72     2.19     2.74     1.85  
 Cash dividends declared (1)  1.05     0.95     0.92     0.80     0.65  
 Common equity  31.66     30.09     28.48     27.17     24.90  
                       
Average Balances:                   
 Total assets$ 197,347   $ 185,095   $ 181,282   $ 178,592   $ 162,903  
 Securities, at amortized cost (2)  42,103     40,541     36,772     36,334     29,923  
 Loans and leases (3)  127,802     118,830     117,527     113,733     105,962  
 Deposits  138,498     129,077     128,555     127,617     112,318  
 Long-term debt  23,343     22,210     19,301     20,651     22,257  
 Shareholders' equity  25,871     23,954     21,860     19,435     17,204  
                      
Period-End Balances:                   
 Total assets$ 209,947   $ 186,834   $ 183,043   $ 184,469   $ 174,956  
 Securities, at amortized cost (2)  43,827     41,147     40,205     38,731     36,407  
 Loans and leases (3)  136,986     121,307     117,139     118,364     111,205  
 Deposits  149,124     129,040     127,475     133,075     124,939  
 Long-term debt  23,769     23,312     21,493     19,114     21,803  
 Shareholders' equity  27,340     24,377     22,780     21,193     17,425  
                       
Selected Ratios:                   
 Rate of return on:                   
  Average total assets  1.08 %   1.19 %   0.95 %   1.15 %   0.83 %
  Average common equity  8.34     9.32     8.07     10.52     7.61  
  Average total shareholders' equity  8.21     9.21     7.91     10.56     7.84  
 Dividend payout  40.54     34.42     41.44     28.78     34.76  
 Average total shareholders' equity to average total assets  13.11     12.94     12.06     10.88     10.56  
                       
                       
(1)2011 included a special $0.01 dividend.
(2)Excludes trading securities.
(3)Loans and leases are net of unearned income and include LHFS.
Note: Prior periods have been revised to reflect the adoption of new accounting guidance for investments in qualified affordable housing projects and certain other reclassifications to conform to the current presentation. See Note 14 "Commitments and Contingencies" for additional information.

29
(2)TE adjustment is based on the marginal income tax rates for the periods presented.
(3)Excludes trading securities. HTM securities at amortized cost. AFS securities at fair value.
(4)Loans and leases are net of unearned income and include LHFS.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Overview

Overview of Significant Events and Financial Results

Net income available to common shareholders totaled $1.9$2.2 billion for 2015,2017, a 2.4% decline1.7% decrease from the prior year. On a diluted per common share basis, earnings for 20152017 were $2.56,$2.74, compared to $2.72$2.77 for 2014.2016. BB&T’s results of operations for 20152017 produced a return on average assets of 1.08%1.09% and a return on average common shareholders’ equity of 8.34%8.25% compared to prior year ratios of 1.19%1.12% and 9.32%8.57%, respectively. These results include merger-related and restructuring charges of $165$115 million for 2015, which reflects current year acquisition activity,2017 compared to $46$171 million for 2014.2016. Net interest income was up primarily due to an 11 basis point increase in the yield on earning assets, and noninteresta $2.3 billion increase in average outstanding loans. Noninterest income were bothwas up due to increased business activity for the majority of revenue sources, as well as higher following the current year acquisition activity.income from SBIC and other investments. Noninterest expense was higherup due to increasesa loss on the early extinguishment of higher-cost FHLB advances of $392 million ($246 million after tax), and $136 million ($86 million after tax) in headcount and locations, primarily the result of the acquisitions, and the provision for credit losses increased after an allowance releaseone-time expenses incurred in the prior year.

Effective January 1, 2015, BB&T adopted new guidance related to the accounting for investments in qualified affordable housing projects. For periods prior to January 1, 2015, amortization expense related to qualifying investments in low income housingconnection with tax credits was reclassified from other income toreform legislation. The current period provision for income taxes andincludes a net tax benefit of $43 million due to the amountpassage of amortization and tax benefits recognized was revised as a result of the adoption of the proportional amortization method. See Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.

During 2015, BB&T acquired Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc., which provided $18.3 billion in assets, $14.1 billion in deposits and 245 branches in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West Virginia and Maryland. BB&T also acquired The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation, which provided $2.0 billion in assets, $1.6 billion in deposits and 32 branches in the northern Kentucky/Cincinnati market, and completed the purchase of 41 retail branches in Texas, providing $1.9 billion in deposits. Additionally, BB&T reached an agreement to acquire National Penn Bancshares, Inc., which had $9.6 billion in assets, $6.7 billion in deposits and 124 branches in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland as of December 31, 2015.

Industry-wide sustained low interest rates represented a significant challenge for the Company during 2015 and for the past several years. From a NIM perspective, the negative impact associated with lower yields on loans and securities was partially mitigated by a decrease in funding costs from 0.65% to 0.60%, primarily driven by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and the early extinguishment of certain higher-cost FHLB advances during 2015 and 2014.

reform legislation.


BB&T’s revenuesrevenue for 2015 were $9.82017 was $11.3 billion. On a TE basis, revenue was $11.5 billion, on a FTE basis,which represents an increase of $384$523 million compared to 2014.2016. Net interest income on a FTETE basis was $221up $214 million higher thancompared to the prior year, which reflects a $187$308 million increase in interest income and a $34$94 million decreaseincrease in interest expense. Noninterest income increased $163$310 million for the year, driven by improvements in FDIC loss share income, higher other income primarily due to income from SBIC investment and income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits, and higher insurance income primarily from the acquisition of Swett and Crawford in 2016. The increase in noninterest income was partially offset by lower mortgage banking income.

income primarily resulting from a decline in the net mortgage servicing rights valuation.

NIM was 3.46% for 2017, compared to 3.39% for the prior year. Average earning assets increased $2.3 billion or 1.2%, while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $1.2 billion, or 0.9%. The annualized TE yield on the total loan portfolio for 2017 was 4.41%, up 11 basis points compared to the prior year. The annualized TE yield on the average securities portfolio was 2.45%, up 12 basis points compared to the prior year.

The provision for credit losses was $428$547 million, compared to $251$572 million for the prior year. This increase reflects the stabilizationdecrease was primarily driven by improvement in the rate of credit improvementcommercial and prior year loan sales that generated gains through the release of the related ALLL.

Asset quality improved significantly during 2015 as industrial portfolio.

NPAs declined $70decreased $186 million or 9.0%, compared to 2014.2016. This decline included a $40$166 million decrease in NPLs primarily due to continuing strong asset quality within commercial and industrial lending and residential mortgage, and a $30$20 million decrease in foreclosed real estate and other property. Net charge-offs for 20152017 were $436$537 million, compared to $538$532 million for the prior year. The ratio of the ALLL to net charge-offs was 3.36x2.78x for 2015,2017, compared to 2.74x2.80x in 2014.

2016.

Noninterest expense increased $414$723 million primarily due to higher personnellosses from the early extinguishment of debt and expenses incurred in connection with tax reform legislation. The actions taken associated with tax reform include a $100 million contribution to the Company's philanthropic fund and $36 million for a one-time bonus paid to associates who do not generally receive incentives. Additionally, noninterest expense and merger-related and restructuring charges, both of which were primarily theincreased due to higher incentive costs as a result of acquisition activity. These increases were partially offset by lower loan-related and other expense asimproved performance.
The effective tax rate was 27.4% for 2017, compared to 30.2% for the prior year included $118 million of charges related to the FHA-insured loan origination process.

During 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals overturnedyear. The current period provision includes a portion of an earlier rulingnet tax benefit related to tax benefits previously disallowed in connection with a financing transaction that resulted in the recognition of incomereform legislation and excess tax benefits of $107 million.

30
from equity-based compensation plans.

BB&T’s total assets at December 31, 20152017 were $209.9$221.6 billion, an increase of $23.1$2.4 billion compared to December 31, 2014.2016. This includes a $15.7$4.0 billion increase in loans and leases due to acquisitions and organic growth. Commercial and industrial loans were up $7.0 billion, CRE-income producing properties loans were up $2.7 billion and direct retail lending loans were up $3.0 billion. Mortgage loans declined $557 million due to management’s continuing decision to sell substantially all conforming mortgage loan production and the impacttotal securities portfolio. The fair value of certain NPL sales, partially offset by acquisition activity. AFS securities totaled $25.3$24.5 billion at December 31, 2015,2017, compared to $20.9$26.9 billion at December 31, 2014.2016. The amortized cost of HTM securities were $18.5was $23.0 billion at December 31, 20152017 compared to $20.2$16.7 billion in the prior year. Goodwill, CDI and other intangible assets were also higher as the result of acquisitions.

Total deposits at December 31, 20152017 were $149.1$157.4 billion, an increasea decrease of $20.1$2.9 billion from the prior year. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $6.9$3.1 billion, interest checking increased $5.1decreased $2.6 billion and money market and savings increased $9.9decreased $2.1 billion. Time deposits declined $1.8$1.2 billion. The overall growth in lower-cost deposits reflects acquisition activityis primarily due to increases in commercial and continued organic growth.public funds balances. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits for 20152017 was 0.24%0.32%, a decline of twoup 9 basis points compared to the prior year.


Total shareholders’ equity increased $3.0was $29.7 billion or 12.2%,at December 31, 2017, down slightly compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily driven by netNet income in excess of dividends totaling $1.2 billion combined with common stock issued in connection with acquisitions.was offset by $1.6 billion of share repurchases. BB&T’s Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 20152017 were 11.8%11.9% and 14.3%13.9%, respectively, compared to 12.4%12.0% and 14.9%14.1% at December 31, 2014,2016, respectively. Common equity tier 1The CET1 ratio was 10.3%10.2% at December 31, 2015.

On February 24, 20162017 compared to 10.2% at December 31, 2016.


Current Regulatory Environment

Over the past several years, BB&T reached an agreementhas made substantial investments and incurred significant costs related to acquire CGSC North America Holdings Corporation from Cooper Gay Swett & Crawford.

personnel, infrastructure and other items in response to increased regulations. While the impact of any relief is uncertain, the current U.S. administration has stated its intention to potentially alleviate part of the regulatory burden on financial institutions.


Key Challenges

BB&T’s business has become moreis dynamic and complex in recent years.complex. Consequently, management has annually evaluatedevaluates and, as necessary, adjustedadjusts the Company’s business strategy in the context of the current operating environment. During this process, management considers the current financial condition and performance of the Company and its expectations for future economic activity from both a national and local market perspective. The achievement of BB&T’s key strategic objectives and established long-term financial goals is subject to many uncertainties and challenges. In the opinion of management, the challenges that are most relevant and likely to have a near term impact on performance are presented below:

·Intense competition within the financial services industry given the challenge in growing assets during a period of sustained low interest rates.

·New technologies and evolving consumer preferences will put pressure on market share and customer loyalty.

·Global economic and geopolitical risk, including potential financial system instability and ramifications of sovereign debt issues.

·Cost and risk associated with regulatory reform and initiatives and IT projects.

·Merger integration risk.

Intense competition within the financial services industry given the challenge in growing assets.

New technologies and evolving consumer preferences will put pressure on market share and customer loyalty.

Global economic and geopolitical risk, including potential financial system instability and ramifications of sovereign debt issues.

Cost and risk associated with regulatory initiatives and IT projects.

In addition, certain other challenges and unforeseen events could have a near term impact on BB&T’s financial condition and results of operations. See the sectionsections titled “Forward-Looking Statements”"Forward-Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors" for additional examples of such challenges.


Analysis of Results of Operations

Net Interest Income and NIM

Net interest income is BB&T’s primary source of revenue. Net interest income is influenced by a number of factors, including the volume, mix and maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned and paid thereon. The difference between rates earned on interest-earning assets and the cost of funds (with a FTETE adjustment made to tax-exempt items to provide comparability with taxable items) is measured by the NIM.

31

2015

2017 compared to 2014

2016

For 2015,2017, net interest income on a FTETE basis totaled $5.7$6.7 billion, an increase of $221$213 million or 4.0%3.3% compared to the prior year. The increase reflects higher interest income due to rate increases and higher outstanding loans primarily due to organic loan growth. This was partially offset by runoff in PCI and residential mortgage loans. Interest expense increased $94 million, reflecting higher funding costs due to rate increases.
The NIM is the primary measure used in evaluating the gross profit margin from the portfolios of earning assets. The NIM was 3.46% in 2017 compared with 3.39% in 2016. The increase in the NIM reflects higher yields on loans and securities, partially offset by higher funding costs. The average annualized TE yield for total loans and leases was 4.41% for 2017, compared to 4.30% for the prior year. The increase was primarily due to rate increases, partially offset by runoff in PCI loans. The TE yield on the total securities portfolio was 2.45% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 2.33% for the prior year.
The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits for 2017 increased to 0.32%, from 0.23% in 2016. This primarily reflects the impact of rate increases.

The average rate on short-term borrowings was 0.94% in 2017, compared to 0.35% in 2016. The increase in the rate on short-term borrowings reflects the federal funds target rate increases. The average rate on long-term debt was 2.10% during 2017, compared to 2.13% in the prior year. The decline in the average rate on long-term debt reflects the impact of the early extinguishment of $2.9 billion of higher cost FHLB advances in the first quarter, partially offset by new issuances. At December 31, 2017, the targeted Federal funds rate was a range of 1.25% to 1.50%.
2016 compared to 2015
For 2016, net interest income on a TE basis totaled $6.5 billion, an increase of $743 million or 12.9% compared to the prior year. The increase reflects higher interest income due to acquisitions and organic loan growth, partially offset by lower yields on new loans and securities and runoff in the loan portfolio acquired from the FDIC. Interest expense declined,increased slightly, reflecting lower rates andhigher balances from acquisitions, partially offset by improvement in the mix of funding sources.
The average cost of interest-bearing deposits declined two basis points to 0.24%, reflecting reductions in time deposits and growth in interest checking and money market and savings. The average cost of long-term debt declined from 2.36% to 2.13%, primarily due to the early extinguishment of $2.0 billion of higher-cost FHLB advances during the last two years.

The FTE-adjusted NIM is the primary measure used in evaluating the gross profit margin from the portfolios of earning assets. The FTE-adjusted NIM was 3.39% in 2016 compared with 3.32% in 2015 compared with 3.42% in 2014.2015. The declineincrease in the NIM reflects lowerhigher yields on loans and securities,improved funding mix, partially offset by the lower funding costs described above.yields on securities. The average annualized FTETE yield for total loans and leases was 4.26%4.30% for 2015,2016, compared to 4.42%4.26% for the prior year. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to acquisitions, partially offset by lower yields on new loan originations and the runoff of higher yielding loans acquired from the FDIC, partially offset by acquisition impact.FDIC. The FTETE yield on the total securities portfolio was 2.36%2.33% for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, compared to 2.45%2.36% for the prior year.

The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits for 20152016 dropped to 0.24%0.23%, from 0.26%0.24% in 2014.2015. This improvement was driven by changes in mix, with time deposits representing a lower percentage of interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2015.

2016.

The rate paid on average short-term borrowings was 0.35% in 2016, compared to 0.15% in 2015, compared to 0.13%2015. The increase in 2014.the rate on short-term borrowings reflects the federal funds target rate increase from December 2015. The average rate on long-term debt during 2015 was 2.13%, during 2016, flat compared to 2.36% for the prior year. This decline reflects the previously mentioned early extinguishment of higher-cost FHLB advances. At December 31, 2015,2016, the targeted Federal funds rate range was a range of 0.25%0.50% to 0.50%, following the first rate increase in several years.

20140.75%.



Table 5
TE Net Interest Income and Rate / Volume Analysis (1)
Year Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
  2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
  Average Balances (6) Yield/Rate Income/Expense Incr. Change due to Incr. Change due to
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 (Decr.) Rate Vol. (Decr.) Rate Vol.
Assets  
  
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Total securities, at amortized cost: (2)  
    
      
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
U.S. Treasury $4,179
 $3,061
 $2,650
 1.71% 1.67% 1.58% $72
 $51
 $42
 $21
 $1
 $20
 $9
 $2
 $7
GSE 2,385
 3,601
 5,338
 2.22
 2.13
 2.13
 53
 77
 113
 (24) 3
 (27) (36) 
 (36)
Agency MBS 37,250
 36,658
 30,683
 2.26
 2.05
 1.98
 841
 750
 605
 91
 79
 12
 145
 22
 123
States and political subdivisions 1,748
 2,361
 2,204
 4.77
 5.20
 5.65
 83
 123
 125
 (40) (10) (30) (2) (11) 9
Non-agency MBS 411
 534
 751
 18.80
 14.56
 13.51
 77
 78
 102
 (1) 19
 (20) (24) 7
 (31)
Other 56
 64
 477
 2.17
 1.87
 1.31
 1
 
 7
 1
 1
 
 (7) 1
 (8)
Total securities 46,029
 46,279
 42,103
 2.45
 2.33
 2.36
 1,127
 1,079
 994
 48
 93
 (45) 85
 21
 64
Other earning assets (3) 3,484
 3,202
 2,768
 1.53
 1.64
 1.39
 53
 53
 38
 
 (4) 4
 15
 8
 7
Loans and leases, net of unearned income: (4)(5)  
  
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Commercial:  
  
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Commercial and industrial 57,994
 56,227
 49,518
 3.59
 3.40
 3.25
 2,080
 1,914
 1,612
 166
 106
 60
 302
 77
 225
CRE 20,497
 19,407
 15,840
 4.08
 3.75
 3.67
 837
 727
 581
 110
 67
 43
 146
 13
 133
Lease financing 1,726
 1,524
 1,183
 2.82
 3.01
 2.82
 49
 45
 33
 4
 (3) 7
 12
 2
 10
Retail:                              
Residential mortgage 29,140
 30,184
 30,252
 4.02
 4.05
 4.15
 1,170
 1,224
 1,255
 (54) (10) (44) (31) (28) (3)
Direct 11,968
 11,796
 9,375
 4.60
 4.27
 4.07
 550
 503
 381
 47
 40
 7
 122
 20
 102
Indirect 17,840
 17,072
 16,443
 6.89
 6.94
 6.86
 1,230
 1,186
 1,127
 44
 (9) 53
 59
 13
 46
Revolving credit 2,662
 2,521
 2,406
 8.88
 8.77
 8.76
 236
 221
 211
 15
 3
 12
 10
 
 10
PCI 784
 1,063
 1,083
 18.86
 19.55
 16.57
 148
 208
 179
 (60) (7) (53) 29
 32
 (3)
Total loans and leases HFI 142,611
 139,794
 126,100
 4.42
 4.31
 4.27
 6,300
 6,028
 5,379
 272
 187
 85
 649
 129
 520
LHFS 1,464
 1,965
 1,702
 3.62
 3.34
 3.63
 53
 66
 62
 (13) 5
 (18) 4
 (5) 9
Total loans and leases 144,075
 141,759
 127,802
 4.41
 4.30
 4.26
 6,353
 6,094
 5,441
 259
 192
 67
 653
 124
 529
Total earning assets 193,588
 191,240
 172,673
 3.89
 3.78
 3.75
 7,533
 7,226
 6,473
 307
 281
 26
 753
 153
 600
Nonearning assets 27,477
 27,705
 24,674
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Total assets $221,065
 $218,945
 $197,347
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity      
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Interest-bearing deposits:  
  
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
Interest checking $28,033
 $27,595
 $22,092
 0.25
 0.14
 0.08
 $70
 $39
 $18
 $31
 $30
 $1
 $21
 $16
 $5
Money market and savings 63,061
 62,966
 56,592
 0.30
 0.20
 0.19
 190
 123
 107
 67
 67
 
 16
 5
 11
Time deposits 14,133
 16,619
 16,405
 0.51
 0.51
 0.66
 72
 85
 107
 (13) 
 (13) (22) (23) 1
Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing 1,142
 1,034
 593
 1.05
 0.38
 0.12
 12
 4
 1
 8
 8
 
 3
 2
 1
Total interest-bearing deposits 106,369
 108,214
 95,682
 0.32
 0.23
 0.24
 344
 251
 233
 93
 105
 (12) 18
 
 18
Short-term borrowings 4,311
 2,554
 3,221
 0.94
 0.35
 0.15
 41
 9
 4
 32
 23
 9
 5
 6
 (1)
Long-term debt 21,660
 22,791
 23,343
 2.10
 2.13
 2.13
 454
 485
 498
 (31) (7) (24) (13) 
 (13)
Total interest-bearing liabilities 132,340
 133,559
 122,246
 0.63
 0.56
 0.60
 839
 745
 735
 94
 121
 (27) 10
 6
 4
Noninterest-bearing deposits 52,872
 49,255
 42,816
    
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other liabilities 5,852
 6,776
 6,414
    
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Shareholders’ equity 30,001
 29,355
 25,871
    
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $221,065
 $218,945
 $197,347
    
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Average interest rate spread  
  
  
 3.26% 3.22% 3.15%    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
NIM / net interest income  
     3.46% 3.39% 3.32% $6,694
 $6,481
 $5,738
 $213
 $160
 $53
 $743
 $147
 $596
TE adjustment  
          
 $159
 $160
 $146
  
  
  
  
  
  
(1)Yields are stated on a TE basis utilizing the marginal income tax rates for the periods presented. The change in interest not solely due to changes in yield/rate or volume has been allocated on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute dollar amount of each.
(2)Total securities include AFS and HTM securities.
(3)Includes cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, FHLB stock and other earning assets.
(4)Loan fees, which are not material for any of the periods shown, are included for rate calculation purposes.
(5)NPLs are included in the average balances.
(6)Excludes basis adjustments for fair value hedges.

Provision for Credit Losses
2017 compared to 2013

For 2014,2016

The provision for credit losses was $547 million in 2017, compared to $572 million in the prior year. The decrease in the provision for credit losses was primarily driven by improvement in the commercial and industrial portfolio, which reflects lower net interest income on a FTE basis totaled $5.5 billion, a decrease of $245 million or 4.3%charge-offs and nonaccrual loans compared to the prior year. The decreaseratio of the ALLL to net charge-offs was 2.78x for 2017, compared to 2.80x for 2016.
Net charge-offs were $537 million for 2017 compared to $532 million in 2016. The ratio of net interest income reflects lower yields on newcharge-offs to average loans and securitiesleases held for investment was 0.38% for both 2017 and runoff2016. Net charge-offs increased by $31 million in the loanindirect lending portfolio, acquired from the FDIC, partially offsetdriven by lower funding costs, which declined $123an increase in loss severity associated with used car values. Commercial and industrial net charge-offs decreased $40 million, compared to 2013. The improvement in funding costs reflects a six basis point reduction in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits due to improved mix and a 67 basis point reduction in the average cost of long-term debt primarily due to the early extinguishment of $1.1 billion of higher-cost FHLB advances during the third quarter and lower rates on new issuances.

The FTE-adjusted NIM was 3.42% in 2014 compared with 3.68% in 2013. The declinelosses in the NIM reflects lower yields on loans and securities, partially offset by the lower funding costs described above. The average annualized FTE yield for total loans and leases was 4.42% for 2014,energy portfolio during 2016.

2016 compared to 4.85% for the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to lower yields on new loan originations and the runoff of higher yielding loans acquired from the FDIC. The FTE yield on the total securities portfolio was 2.45% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2.51% for the prior year.

The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits for 2014 dropped to 0.26%, from 0.32% in 2013. This improvement was driven by an 18 basis point reduction in the cost of time deposits.

The rates paid on average short-term borrowings declined to 0.13% in 2014 from 0.16% in 2013. At December 31, 2014, the targeted Federal funds rate was a range of zero percent to 0.25%. The average rate on long-term debt during 2014 was 2.36%, compared to 3.03% for the prior year. This decline reflects the previously mentioned early extinguishment of $1.1 billion of higher-cost FHLB advances and lower rates on new issuances.

The following table sets forth the major components of net interest income and the related yields and rates, as well as the variances between the periods caused by changes in interest rates versus changes in volumes. Changes attributable to the mix of assets and liabilities have been allocated proportionally between the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

32
2015

Table 7
FTE Net Interest Income and Rate / Volume Analysis (1)
Year Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013
                                 2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013
      Average Balances (7) Yield/Rate Income/Expense Increase Change due to Increase Change due to
      2015 2014  2013  2015 2014  2013  2015 2014  2013  (Decrease) Rate Volume (Decrease) Rate Volume
                                                  
      (Dollars in millions)
Assets                                             
Total securities, at amortized cost: (2)                                             
 U.S. Treasuries $ 2,650  $ 1,969  $ 486   1.58 %  1.51 %  0.42 % $ 42  $ 30  $ 2  $ 12  $ 1  $ 11  $ 28  $ 13  $ 15 
 GSEs   5,338    5,516    5,032   2.13    2.10    2.04     113    116    103    (3)   2    (5)   13    3    10 
 MBS issued by GSE   30,683    29,504    27,598   1.98    2.00    2.00     605    589    552    16    (6)   22    37    ―      37 
 States and political subdivisions   1,913    1,827    1,836   5.62    5.78    5.80     108    106    107    2    (3)   5    (1)   ―      (1)
 Non-agency MBS   215    246    283   8.17    7.55    5.69     18    19    16    (1)   1    (2)   3    5    (2)
 Other   477    547    470   1.31    1.43    1.45     7    8    7    (1)   (1)   ―      1    ―      1 
 Acquired from FDIC   827    932    1,067   12.22    13.35    12.82     101    125    137    (24)   (10)   (14)   (12)   5    (17)
  Total securities   42,103    40,541    36,772   2.36    2.45    2.51     994    993    924    1    (16)   17    69    26    43 
Other earning assets (3)   2,768    1,881    2,412   1.39    2.13    1.39     38    40    34    (2)   (17)   15    6    15    (9)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income: (4)(5)                                             
 Commercial:                                             
  Commercial and industrial   44,648    39,537    38,206   3.21    3.35    3.63     1,434    1,325    1,386    109    (57)   166    (61)   (108)   47 
  CRE-income producing properties   11,806    10,489    9,916   3.66    3.49    3.72     432    366    368    66    18    48    (2)   (23)   21 
  CRE-construction and development   3,196    2,616    2,589   3.57    3.51    3.86     114    92    100    22    2    20    (8)   (9)   1 
  Dealer floor plan   1,068    985    619   1.85    1.87    2.18     20    18    14    2    ―      2    4    (2)   6 
 Direct retail lending (6)   9,375    8,249    15,952   4.07    4.10    4.64     381    338    741    43    (2)   45    (403)   (78)   (325)
 Sales finance   9,975    9,022    8,039   2.86    2.80    3.26     286    253    261    33    6    27    (8)   (38)   30 
 Revolving credit   2,406    2,385    2,303   8.76    8.70    8.56     211    208    197    3    1    2    11    3    8 
 Residential mortgage (6)   30,252    31,528    23,598   4.15    4.20    4.22     1,255    1,325    996    (70)   (16)   (54)   329    (5)   334 
 Other lending subsidiaries   12,291    10,848    10,468   8.68    9.08    10.20     1,067    985    1,068    82    (45)   127    (83)   (121)   38 
 PCI   1,083    1,613    2,667   16.57    17.22    16.93     179    278    451    (99)   (10)   (89)   (173)   8    (181)
  Total loans and leases HFI   126,100    117,272    114,357   4.27    4.42    4.88     5,379    5,188    5,582    191    (103)   294    (394)   (373)   (21)
 LHFS   1,702    1,558    3,170   3.63    4.19    3.59     62    65    114    (3)   (9)   6    (49)   17    (66)
  Total loans and leases   127,802    118,830    117,527   4.26    4.42    4.85     5,441    5,253    5,696    188    (112)   300    (443)   (356)   (87)
  Total earning assets   172,673    161,252    156,711   3.75    3.90    4.25     6,473    6,286    6,654    187    (145)   332    (368)   (315)   (53)
  Nonearning assets   24,674    23,843    24,571                                     
   Total assets $ 197,347  $ 185,095  $ 181,282                                     
                                                  
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                                             
Interest-bearing deposits:                                             
 Interest checking $ 22,092  $ 18,731  $ 19,305   0.08    0.07    0.08     18    13    15    5    2    3    (2)   (2)   ―   
 Money market and savings   56,592    49,728    48,640   0.19    0.15    0.13     107    74    64    33    22    11    10    9    1 
 Time deposits   16,405    22,569    26,006   0.66    0.67    0.85     107    151    221    (44)   (2)   (42)   (70)   (43)   (27)
 Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing   593    722    672   0.12    0.07    0.08     1    1    1    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―   
  Total interest-bearing deposits   95,682    91,750    94,623   0.24    0.26    0.32     233    239    301    (6)   22    (28)   (62)   (36)   (26)
Short-term borrowings   3,221    3,421    4,459   0.15    0.13    0.16     5    5    7    ―      ―      ―      (2)   (1)   (1)
Long-term debt   23,343    22,210    19,301   2.13    2.36    3.03     497    525    584    (28)   (54)   26    (59)   (139)   80 
  Total interest-bearing liabilities   122,246    117,381    118,383   0.60    0.65    0.75     735    769    892    (34)   (32)   (2)   (123)   (176)   53 
  Noninterest-bearing deposits   42,816    37,327    33,932                                     
  Other liabilities   6,414    6,433    7,107                                     
  Shareholders’ equity   25,871    23,954    21,860                                     
   Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 197,347  $ 185,095  $ 181,282                                     
Average interest rate spread           3.15 %  3.25 %  3.50 %                           
NIM / net interest income           3.32 %  3.42 %  3.68 % $ 5,738  $ 5,517  $ 5,762  $ 221  $ (113) $ 334  $ (245) $ (139) $ (106)
FTE adjustment                   $ 146  $ 143  $ 149                   
                                                  
                                                  
(1)Yields are stated on a FTE basis assuming tax rates in effect for the periods presented.
(2)Total securities include AFS and HTM securities at amortized cost.
(3)Includes Federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements or similar arrangements, interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, FHLB stock and other earning assets.
(4)Loan fees, which are not material for any of the periods shown, have been included for rate calculation purposes.
(5)NPLs have been included in the average balances.
(6)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion in loans were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage.
(7)Excludes basis adjustments for fair value hedges.

33

Provision for Credit Losses

2015 compared to 2014

The provision for credit losses was $572 million in 2016, compared to $428 million in 2015, an increase of $177 million compared to the prior year. The increase in the provision for credit losses was driven by indirect lending and commercial and industrial portfolios, which reflects allowance releases on loan saleshigher net charge-offs in the prior year and stabilization in credit trends after an extended period of improvements.these portfolios. The ratio of the ALLL to net charge-offs was 2.80x for 2016, compared to 3.36x for 2015, compared to 2.74x for 2014. During the prior year, loan sales resulted in a combined $66 million in gains recognized through the release of the ALLL.

2015.

Net charge-offs were 0.38% of average loans and leases held for investment for 2016, compared to 0.35% of average loans and leases held for investment during 2015. Net charge-offs were $532 million for 2015,2016 compared to 0.46% of average loans$436 million in 2015. Commercial and leases held for investment during 2014.industrial net charge-offs increased $50 million, primarily due to the energy portfolio. Net charge-offs declined $102 million, or 19.0%, with improvement across several loan portfolios ledincreased by commercial and industrial loans, which declined $45 million, and residential mortgage-nonguaranteed, which declined $38 million.

2014 compared to 2013

The provision for credit losses was $251$49 million in 2014, a decrease of $341 million compared to the prior year. The decrease in the provision for credit losses reflects continued improvement in credit trends and outlook, as net charge-offs in 2014 decreased 32.1% compared to the prior year. Improving credit conditions also resulted inindirect lending portfolio, driven by an increase in the ratio of the ALLL to net charge-offs, which increased to 2.74x for 2014, compared to 2.19x for 2013.

During 2014, approximately $550 million of residential mortgage loans that were primarily performing TDRsloss severity associated with used car values and approximately $140 million of residential mortgage loans that were primarily nonperforming were sold at a pre-tax gain of $42 million and $24 million, respectively. Both of these gains were recognized as a reduction to the provision for credit losses.

Net charge-offs were 0.46% of average loans and leases held for investment for 2014, compared to 0.69% of average loans and leases held for investment during 2013. Net charge-offs declined $254 million, or 32.1%, with improvement across most loan portfolios led by commercial and industrial loans, which declined $112 million compared to 2013. Net charge-offs in other lending subsidiaries were $15 million higher primarily due to a process change that resulted in the accelerated recognition of charge-offs in the nonprime automobile lending portfolio.

growth.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income is a significant contributor to BB&T’s financial results. Management focuses on diversifying its sources of revenue to further reduce BB&T’s reliance on traditional spread-based interest income, as certain fee-based activities are a relatively stable revenue source during periods of changing interest rates.

34
TableofContents

Table 8
Noninterest Income
                   
    Year Ended December 31, % Change 
    2015 2014 2013 2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013 
                   
    (Dollars in millions)       
 Insurance income$ 1,596  $ 1,643  $ 1,517   (2.9)%  8.3 % 
 Service charges on deposits  631    632    619   (0.2)   2.1   
 Mortgage banking income  455    395    565   15.2    (30.1)  
 Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions  398    387    383   2.8    1.0   
 Trust and investment advisory revenues  240    221    200   8.6    10.5   
 Bankcard fees and merchant discounts  218    207    202   5.3    2.5   
 Checkcard fees  174    163    157   6.7    3.8   
 Operating lease income  124    95    77   30.5    23.4   
 Income from bank-owned life insurance  113    110    113   2.7    (2.7)  
 FDIC loss share income, net  (253)   (343)   (293)  (26.2)   17.1   
 Securities gains (losses), net  (3)   (3)   51   ―      (105.9)  
 Other income  326    349    445   (6.6)   (21.6)  
  Total noninterest income$ 4,019  $ 3,856  $ 4,036   4.2    (4.5)  
                   

2015

Table 6
Noninterest Income
     
  Year Ended December 31, % Change
   2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015  
Insurance income $1,754
 $1,713
 $1,596
 2.4 % 7.3 %
Service charges on deposits 706
 664
 631
 6.3
 5.2
Mortgage banking income 415
 463
 455
 (10.4) 1.8
Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions 410
 408
 398
 0.5
 2.5
Trust and investment advisory revenues 278
 266
 240
 4.5
 10.8
Bankcard fees and merchant discounts 271
 237
 218
 14.3
 8.7
Checkcard fees 214
 195
 174
 9.7
 12.1
Operating lease income 146
 137
 124
 6.6
 10.5
Income from bank-owned life insurance 122
 123
 113
 (0.8) 8.8
FDIC loss share income, net 
 (142) (253) (100.0) (43.9)
Securities gains (losses), net (1) 46
 (3) (102.2) NM
Other income 467
 362
 326
 29.0
 11.0
Total noninterest income $4,782
 $4,472
 $4,019
 6.9
 11.3
2017 compared to 2014

2016

Noninterest income was a record $4.0$4.8 billion for 2015,2017, an increase of $163$310 million compared to 2014. This2016. The increase was driven by improved FDIC loss share income, higher mortgage banking income and higher operating lease income, partially offset by lower insurance income and lower otherbroad based across almost all major categories of noninterest income.

FDIC loss share income improved by $90 million, primarily due to a $58 million reduction in negative accretion related to credit losses on covered loans and a $20 million change in the offset to the provision for covered loans. See “Acquired from the FDIC and FDIC Loss Share Receivable/Payable” for additional information.

Mortgage banking income increased $60 million, primarily due to higher volume and $17 million of higher MSR valuation adjustments.

Operating lease income increased $29 million, primarily due to a larger leasing portfolio size as this business has continued to demonstrate steady growth.

Income from BB&T’s insurance agency/brokerage operations was the largest source of noninterest income in 2015.2017. Insurance income totaled $1.6$1.8 billion for 2015,2017, an increase of $41 million compared to 2016. The increase was largely due to the acquisition of Swett and Crawford on April 1, 2016. In addition, organic commissions and fees were higher, which was offset by lower performance based commissions.


Service charges on deposits were $706 million for 2017, an increase of $42 million compared to 2016. The increase was due to changes in client behavior, pricing increases and the acquisition of National Penn on April 1, 2016.

Mortgage banking income declined $48 million primarily due to a decline of $47$39 million in the net mortgage servicing rights valuation.

Bankcard fees and merchant discounts increased $34 million due to higher volumes and a reduction in the accrual for rewards.

FDIC loss share income improved by $142 million due to the termination of the loss sharing agreements during the third quarter of 2016.
Other income totaled $467 million for 2017, an increase of $105 million from 2016, primarily due to a $34 million increase in income from SBIC investments and a $50 million increase driven by income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits.
2016 compared to 2015
Noninterest income was $4.5 billion for 2016, an increase of $453 million compared to 2014.2015. This increase was across all categories and primarily reflects the impact from acquisitions.
Income from BB&T’s insurance agency/brokerage operations was the largest source of noninterest income in 2016. Insurance income totaled $1.7 billion for 2016, an increase of $117 million compared to 2015. The second quarter saleincrease was largely the result of American Coastal resulted in a $79 million decline in insurance income,the acquisition of Swett and Crawford, which was partially offset by higher volumethe impact from selling American Coastal in 2015.

FDIC loss share income improved by $111 million, primarily due to the property and casualty business.

termination of the loss sharing agreements during the third quarter of 2016.

Other income totaled $326$362 million for 2015, a decline2016, an increase of $23$36 million from 2014.2015. This declineincrease is primarily due to the $26 million loss on sale of American Coastal during the second quarter of 2015, $19 million for client derivatives revenues and $18$10 million of lower income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits (which is offset in personnel expense).trading gains. These declinesincreases were partially offset by higherlower partnerships and other investment income, which was the result of an opportunistic sale that resulted in a $28 million gain during the third quarter of 2015.

2014 compared to 2013

Noninterest income was $3.9 billion for 2014, compared to $4.0 billion for 2013. This decrease was driven by declines in mortgage banking income, FDIC loss share income, net securities gains and other income, partially offset by growth in insurance income.

Income from BB&T’s insurance agency/brokerage operations was the largest source of noninterest income in 2014. Insurance income was $1.6 billion, up $126 million compared to 2013, as increased volume and improving market conditions drove broad-based increases across the insurance business. This growth was led by a $95 million increase in property and casualty commissions and a $17 million increase in contingent insurance commissions.

35

Mortgage banking income totaled $395 million in 2014, a decrease of $170 million compared to the prior year. The decrease in mortgage banking income includes a $182 million decrease in residential mortgage production revenues primarily due to decreases in the volume and margins on loan sales, which have come under pressure due to increased competition and sustained low interest rates. The decline also reflects an $18 million reduction in fees primarily due to a reduction in volume. These declines were partially offset by increased servicing income due to a larger servicing portfolio as well as an increase in derivative income.

Net securities gains declined $54 million as the prior year contained a $46 million gain on the sale of GNMA securities. FDIC loss share income, net, was $50 million worse than 2013, primarily due to a $29 million change in the offset to the provision for covered loans, which was a benefit in 2014 due to improved credit quality on the acquired loans.

Trust and investment advisory revenues increased $21 million to a record $221 million, primarily the result of higher investment advisory revenues during the current year. Other income decreased $96 million in 2014, primarily due to a $31 million gain on the sale of a consumer lending subsidiary in 2013, a $24 million decrease in income from assets related to certain post-employment benefits, which is offset in personnel expense, and an $8 million decrease in letter of credit fees. These declines and other smaller declines were partially offset by a $19 million increase in leasing income.

Noninterest Expense

The following table provides a breakdown of BB&T’s noninterest expense:

Table 9
Noninterest Expense
                    
     Year Ended December 31, % Change 
     2015 2014 2013 2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013 
                    
     (Dollars in millions)       
 Personnel expense$ 3,469  $ 3,180  $3,293   9.1 %  (3.4)% 
 Occupancy and equipment expense  708    682   692   3.8    (1.4)  
 Software expense  192    174   158   10.3    10.1   
 Loan-related expense  150    267   188   (43.8)   42.0   
 Outside IT services  135    115   89   17.4    29.2   
 Professional services  130    139   189   (6.5)   (26.5)  
 Amortization of intangibles  105    91   106   15.4    (14.2)  
 Regulatory charges  101    106   143   (4.7)   (25.9)  
 Foreclosed property expense  53    40   55   32.5    (27.3)  
 Merger-related and restructuring charges, net  165    46   46  NM   ―     
 Loss on early extinguishment of debt  172    122    ―     41.0   NM  
 Other expense  886    890   818   (0.4)   8.8   
  Total noninterest expense$ 6,266  $ 5,852  $ 5,777   7.1    1.3   

2015

Table 7
Noninterest Expense
     
  Year Ended December 31, % Change
   2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015  
Personnel expense $4,121
 $3,964
 $3,469
 4.0 % 14.3 %
Occupancy and equipment expense 784
 786
 708
 (0.3) 11.0
Software expense 242
 224
 192
 8.0
 16.7
Outside IT services 160
 186
 135
 (14.0) 37.8
Regulatory charges 153
 145
 101
 5.5
 43.6
Amortization of intangibles 142
 150
 105
 (5.3) 42.9
Loan-related expense 130
 95
 150
 36.8
 (36.7)
Professional services 123
 102
 130
 20.6
 (21.5)
Merger-related and restructuring charges, net 115
 171
 165
 (32.7) 3.6
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt 392
 (1) 172
 NM
 (100.6)
Other expense 1,082
 899
 939
 20.4
 (4.3)
Total noninterest expense $7,444
 $6,721
 $6,266
 10.8
 7.3
2017 compared to 2014

2016

Noninterest expense totaled $6.3$7.4 billion for 2015,2017, an increase of $414$723 million from 2014.2016. The increase includes actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2017 in connection with the passage of tax reform legislation. This included a contribution of $100 million to BB&T's philanthropic fund and $36 million for a one-time bonus paid to associates who do not generally receive incentives or commissions. The increase also includes a $392 million charge in 2017 for the early extinguishment of $2.9 billion of higher cost FHLB advances.

Personnel expense is the largest component of noninterest expense and includes salaries and incentives, as well as pension and other employee benefit costs. Personnel expense totaled $4.1 billion, a $157 million increase compared to 2016. Salaries and incentives increased $120 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher incentives as a result of improved performance and the one-time bonus previously mentioned. Equity based compensation increased $14 million and benefit costs increased $23 million. The increase in benefit costs was primarily the result of an increase of $43 million for post-employment benefits that is primarily offset in other income. This was partially offset by a decline of $26 million for pension expense.
Software expense was higher $18 million compared to 2016, primarily reflecting higher depreciation on recent investments.

Outside IT services expense decreased $26 million compared to the prior year, while professional services expense increased $21 million. These fluctuations are due to the volume of project related work in the current year compared to the prior year.
Loan-related expense totaled $130 million for 2017, an increase of $35 million compared to the prior year. This increase is largely the result of a release of $31 million in reserves during the fourth quarter of 2016, which was primarily driven by lower anticipated loan repurchase requests.

Merger-related and restructuring expense decreased $56 million compared to 2016. This includes a decrease in merger-related charges, partially offset by branch closures and other restructuring initiatives.

Other expense increased $183 million primarily due to higher operating charge-offs and charitable contributions. Operating charge-offs increased $108 million due to a net benefit of $73 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of matters involving the origination of certain legacy mortgage loans insured by the FHA. Charitable contributions increased $44 million as the company made a $100 million contribution to its philanthropic fund in 2017 as noted above, compared to $50 million made in the third quarter of 2016.

2016 compared to 2015
Noninterest expense totaled $6.7 billion for 2016, an increase of $455 million from 2015. This increase was primarily driven by higher personnel expense, merger-related and restructuring charges and loss on early extinguishment of debt, partially offset by lower loan-related expense.

Personnel expense is the largest component of noninterest expense and includes salaries, wages and incentives, as well as pension and other employee benefit costs. Personnel expense totaled $3.5$4.0 billion, a $289$495 million increase compared to 2014.2015. This increase was driven by a $114$284 million increase in salaries, which was primarily due to additional headcount from acquisitions. Incentives expense was higher $110 million due to performance against targets and acquisitions. Personnel expense also increased due to a $74$48 million increase in pension expense that reflects higher amortization, service and interest costs, partially offset by the estimated return on higher plan assets.costs. Additionally, personnel expense reflects a $50$26 million increase in employee medicalpayroll taxes as a result of higher salaries and insurance benefits and a $32 million increase in incentives.

Merger-related and restructuring charges totaled $165 million, an increase of $119 million compared to 2014. This increase was primarily related to the Susquehanna acquisition, with additional amounts related to The Bank of Kentucky and the planned acquisition of National Penn.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt was down $173 million for 2016, as the prior year included a loss of $172 million, for 2015, compared to $122 milliona small gain for 2014. The combined debt extinguishments for the two years totaled $2.0 billion of FHLB advances with a weighted average interest rate of 4.5%.

36
2016.

Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $786 million for 2016, compared to $708 million for 2015, compared to $682 million for 2014.2015. The increase reflects the acquisition activity occurring duringactivity. Software expense was higher $32 million compared to 2015, primarily reflecting higher depreciation on recent investments.

Outside IT services expense totaled $186 million for 2016, compared to $135 million in the prior year.

This increase was due to higher costs related to projects.

Loan-related expense totaled $150$95 million for 2015,2016, a decrease of $117$55 million compared to the prior year. This decrease is largely the result of lower claims and chargeoffsa release of $31 million in reserves during the current year, as well as charges recorded in the prior yearfourth quarter of $33 million related to the FHA-insured loan origination process and $27 million related to a review of mortgage lending processes.

2014 compared to 2013

Personnel expense totaled $3.2 billion, a decrease of $113 million compared to 2013. This decline2016, which was primarily driven by a $110 million reduction in qualified pension plan expense, primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets and a change in the actuarial discount rate used to determine the projected benefit obligation as of the beginning of the year that resulted in reduced amortization expense during 2014.

Professional services expense totaled $139 million, a decrease of $50 million compared to the prior year. This decrease was driven by a reduction in legal fees as well as services associated with regulatory initiatives. lower anticipated loan repurchase requests.


Regulatory charges totaled $106$145 million for 2014, a decline of $37 million compared to 2013, which primarily reflects a reduction in FDIC insurance due to long-term debt issuances and improved credit conditions.

Loan-related expense totaled $267 million for 2014,2016, an increase of $79$44 million compared to the prior year. This increase includes a $33 million mortgage loan indemnification reserve adjustment,reflects the impact from acquisitions and the surcharge assessed to large banks, which represents an increasewas implemented in estimated losses that may be incurred on FHA-insured mortgage loans that have not yet defaulted, and a mortgage reserve adjustment of $27 million related to a review of mortgage lending processes.

Outside IT services totaled $115 million during 2014, compared to $89 million for 2013. This increase was due to third-party costs associated with the new ERP and commercial loan systems.

A loss on early extinguishment of debt of $122 million was recorded during 2014 in connection with the early termination of $1.1 billion of higher cost FHLB advances. The transaction occurred during the third quarter of 2014 and had a beneficial impact to net interest income for the remainder of the year.

2016.


Other expense was $890decreased $40 million for 2014, an increaseprimarily due to a net benefit of $72$73 million comparedin the third quarter related to 2013. During June 2014, BB&T received notice from the HUD-OIG that BB&T had been selected for an audit/survey to assess BB&T's compliance with FHA loansettlement of certain legacy mortgage matters involving the origination and quality control requirements. In late 2014 and in 2015, BB&T received subpoenas from the HUD-OIG and the Department of Justice seeking additional information regarding its lending practices in connection withmortgage loans insured by the FHA. BB&T is cooperating with the investigation. While the outcome of the investigation is unknown and neither the Department of Justice nor the HUD-OIG has asserted any claims, similar reviews and related matters with other financial institutions have resulted in cash settlements and other remedial actions. BB&T identified a potential exposure related to losses incurred by the FHA on defaulted loans that ranges from $25In addition, business referral expense decreased $16 million to $105 million and recognized an $85 million charge during 2014. The income statement impact of this adjustment was included in other expense on the Consolidated Statements of lncome. The ultimate resolution of this matter is uncertain and the estimates of this exposure are subject to the application of significant judgment and therefore cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.

The increase in other expense also includes a $17 million increase in depreciation related to operating leases. These increases were partially offset by a $15 million favorable franchise tax adjustment and a decline in expenseprimarily due to the sale of American Coastal in the prior year $11year. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $50 million write-down of owned real estate.

charitable contribution that was also made in the third quarter.


Merger-Related and Restructuring Charges

BB&T has incurred certain merger-related and restructuring charges, which are reflectedinclude:
severance and personnel-related costs or credits, which typically occur in BB&T’s Consolidated Statementscorporate support and data processing functions;
occupancy and equipment charges or credits, which relate to costs or gains associated with lease terminations, obsolete equipment write-offs and the sale of Income as a category of noninterest expense. Merger-relatedduplicate facilities and equipment;
professional services, which relate to investment banking advisory fees and other consulting services pertaining to the transaction;
systems conversion and related charges, which represent costs to integrate the acquired entity’s information technology systems; and
other merger-related and restructuring expensescharges or credits, include:

·severance and personnel-related costs or credits, which typically occur in corporate support and data processing functions;
·occupancy and equipment charges or credits, which relate to costs or gains associated with lease terminations, obsolete equipment write-offs and the sale of duplicate facilities and equipment;
·professional services, which relate to investment banking advisory fees and other consulting services pertaining to the transaction;

37
which include expenses necessary to convert and combine the acquired branches and operations of merged companies, direct media advertising related to the acquisitions, asset and supply inventory write-offs, and other similar charges.

·systems conversion and related charges, which represent costs to integrate the acquired entity’s information technology systems; and

·other merger-related and restructuring charges or credits, which include expenses necessary to convert and combine the acquired branches and operations of merged companies, direct media advertising related to the acquisitions, asset and supply inventory write-offs, and other similar charges.

Merger-related and restructuring accruals are established when the costs are incurred or once all requirements for a plan to dispose of certain business functions have been approved by management. In general, a major portion of accrued costs are utilized in conjunction with or immediately following the systems conversion, when most of the duplicate positions are eliminated and the terminated employees begin to receive severance. Other accruals are utilized over time based on the sale, closing or disposal of duplicate facilities or equipment or the expiration of lease contracts. Merger and restructuring accruals are re-evaluated periodically and adjusted as necessary. The remaining accruals at December 31, 20152017 are generally expected to be utilized within one year, unless they relate to specific contracts that expire later.

The following table presents a summary of activity with respect to merger-related and restructuring accruals:
                  
Table 10
Merger-related and Restructuring Accrual Activity
                  
      Year Ended December 31, 2015 
      Beginning Balance Merger-Related Charges, net Utilized Ending Balance 
                  
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Severance and personnel-related$ 2  $ 60  $ (36) $ 26  
 Occupancy and equipment  7    16    (12)   11  
 Professional services  17    34    (38)   13  
 Systems conversion and related charges  ―      25    (25)   ―    
 Other adjustments  5    30    (33)   2  
  Total$ 31  $ 165  $ (144) $ 52  
                  

The following table presents a summary of merger-related and restructuring charges and the related accruals:
Table 8
Merger-related and Restructuring Accrual Activity
           
  Year Ended December 31, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Beginning Balance Expense Utilized Ending Balance Beginning Balance Expense Utilized Ending Balance
Severance and personnel-related $25
 $40
 $(51) $14
 $26
 $51
 $(52) $25
Occupancy and equipment (1) 21
 43
 (44) 20
 11
 49
 (39) 21
Professional services 1
 2
 (3) 
 13
 14
 (26) 1
Systems conversion and related costs (1) 1
 26
 (27) 
 
 27
 (26) 1
Other adjustments 1
 4
 (5) 
 2
 30
 (31) 1
Total $49
 $115
 $(130) $34
 $52
 $171
 $(174) $49
 (1) Includes asset impairment charges.

The 2017 costs primarily reflect branch closures and other restructuring initiatives, while the 2016 costs primarily reflect the acquisitions of National Penn and Swett & Crawford.
Provision for Income Taxes

BB&T’s provision for income taxes totaled $911 million, $1.1 billion and $794 million $921 millionfor 2017, 2016 and $1.6 billion for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. BB&T’s effective tax rates for the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014were 27.4%, 30.2% and 2013 were 27.2%, 29.5% and 47.3%, respectively. The changes in the effective tax rates during 2015, 2014 and 2013 were primarily due to adjustments for uncertain tax positions as discussed below.

During 2010, BB&T received an IRS statutory notice of deficiency for tax years 2002-2007 asserting a liability for taxes, penalties and interest of approximately $892 million related to the disallowance of foreign tax credits and other deductions claimed by a subsidiary in connection with a financing transaction. BB&T paid the disputed tax, penalties and interest during 2010 and filed a lawsuit seeking a refund in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. During 2013, the court denied the refund claim, and BB&T recorded $516 million of income tax charges. BB&T appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On May 14, 2015, the appeals court overturned a portion of the earlier ruling, resulting in the recognition of income tax benefits of $107 million during the second quarter of 2015. The remainder of the decision was affirmed. On September 29, 2015, BB&T filed a petition requesting the case be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court,which has not rendered a decision on whether it will hear the case.

BB&T has extended credit to and invested in the obligations of states and municipalities and their agencies and has made other investments and loans that produce tax-exempt income. The income generated from these investments, together with certain other transactions that have favorable tax treatment, have reduced BB&T’s overall effective tax rate from the statutory rate in all periods presented.

The lower effective tax rate for 2017 was due to a net tax benefit of $43 million related to the impact of tax reform. The lower effective tax rate for 2015 was primarily due to adjustments for uncertain tax positions.

Refer to Note 12 “Income Taxes” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”"Note 11. Income Taxes" for a reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the statutory tax rate and a discussion of uncertain tax positions and other tax matters.

38

Segment Results

See Note 20 “Operating Segments” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein"Note 19. Operating Segments" for additional disclosures related to BB&T’s operating segments, the internal accounting and reporting practices used to manage these segments and financial disclosures for these segments.



Fluctuations in noninterest income and noninterest expense incurred directly by the segments are more fully discussed in the “Noninterest Income”"Noninterest Income" and “Noninterest Expense”"Noninterest Expense" sections above.

The operating results for Susquehanna and National Penn were included in OT&C prior to their systems conversions in mid-November 2015 and mid-July 2016, respectively. Post-conversion results are included in the segments that received the various lines of business, with the majority going to CB-Retail and CB-Commercial.

In 2017, BB&T restructured its segments to reflect a change in the way management reviews performance and makes decisions as discussed in "Note 19. Operating Segments." In addition, a change was made in the method for allocation of capital to the operating segments impacting both the allocated balances and funding credit. Results for prior periods have been revised to reflect the new allocations.

2017 compared to 2014

Community Banking

2016

Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance
CB-Retail had 2,049 banking offices at December 31, 2017, a networkdecrease of 2,139147 offices compared to the prior year. The decrease in offices was primarily driven by the consolidation of nearby financial centers and the closure of certain lower volume branches.

CB-Retail net income was $1.1 billion in 2017, a decrease of $37 million, or 3.3%, compared to 2016.

Segment net interest income increased $159 million, primarily due to the National Penn acquisition, deposit growth and higher funding spreads on deposits, partially offset by lower credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income increased $50 million, primarily due to higher bankcard and merchant discounts, service charges on deposits, and checkcard fees, partially offset by a decline in mortgage banking income due to a decrease in net MSR income.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $26 million, primarily due to higher net charge-offs, partially offset by a decline in loss estimates. Noninterest expense increased $256 million, driven by a net benefit of $73 million in 2016 related to the settlement of certain legacy mortgage matters involving the origination of mortgage loans insured by the FHA, the release of $31 million in mortgage repurchase reserves in 2016, and increases in personnel expense, allocated corporate expenses, and occupancy and equipment expense.

CB-Retail average loans and leases HFI increased $413 million, or 0.6% compared to the prior year. Average indirect loans increased $768 million, or 4.5%, and average direct loans increased $391 million, or 3.4%. Partially offsetting these increases was average residential mortgage loans, which decreased $761 million, or 2.5%.

Community Banking Commercial
CB-Commercial net income was $834 million in 2017, an increase of $99 million, or 13.5%, compared to 2016.

Segment net interest income increased $111 million, primarily due to the National Penn acquisition, loan and deposit growth and higher funding spreads on deposits, partially offset by lower credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income increased $31 million, primarily due to higher service charges on deposits.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $109 million, primarily due to a decline in the rate of improvement in credit trends and loan growth. Noninterest expense decreased $104 million, primarily due to lower personnel expense driven by a change in the allocation approach for capitalized loan origination costs in the current year as well as a decline in salaries expense and employee benefits expense. Additionally, there was a decline in allocated corporate expenses.

CB-Commercial average loans and leases HFI increased $2.4 billion, or 4.9%, partially driven by acquisition activity.

Financial Services and Commercial Finance
FS&CF net income was $491 million in 2017, an increase of $115 million, or 30.6%, compared to 2016.

Segment net interest income increased $57 million, primarily driven by higher funding spreads on deposits and average loan growth, partially offset by a decline in credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income increased $33 million, primarily driven by higher trust and investment advisory revenues, operating lease income, commercial loan fees, investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions, and service charges on deposits, partially offset by lower commercial mortgage banking income.


The allocated provision for credit losses decreased $143 million, primarily due to a decrease in reserves in the current period related to energy lending exposures, a decline in loss estimates and lower net charge-offs. Noninterest expense increased $49 million, primarily due to higher allocated corporate expenses and personnel expense, partially offset by a decline in merger-related and restructuring charges.

FS&CF continues to generate solid loan growth through expanded lending strategies, with Corporate Banking’s average loans HFI increasing $743 million, or 5.3%, compared to 2016, while BB&T Wealth’s average loans HFI increased $205 million, or 13.8%. Corporate Banking’s average transaction account deposits fell $112 million, or 5.4%, while BB&T Wealth grew transaction account balances by $760 million, or 19.8%. Client invested assets totaled $160.3 billion as of December 31, 2017, an increase of $16.6 billion, or 11.6%, compared to 2016. Average loans HFI at Grandbridge increased $200 million, or 15.6%, compared to 2016 and increased 15.5% and 9.1%, respectively, for Equipment Finance and Governmental Finance.

Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance
IH&PF net income was $161 million in 2017, a decrease of $5 million, or 3.0%, compared to 2016.

Noninterest income increased $46 million, which reflects the acquisition of Swett and Crawford in April 2016 and higher property and casualty insurance commissions, as well as higher life insurance commissions and employee benefit commissions.

Noninterest expense increased $65 million, primarily driven by higher personnel expense and allocated corporate expenses, both of which are primarily attributable to the Swett and Crawford acquisition.

Other, Treasury and Corporate
OT&C net loss was $163 million in 2017, compared to net income of $36 million in 2016.

Segment net interest income decreased $123 million, primarily due to the inclusion of National Penn results for a portion of the earlier period, a decline in average PCI loans and an increase in short-term borrowings, partially offset by an increase in average securities.

Noninterest income increased $150 million, primarily driven by a $142 million improvement in FDIC loss share income as a result of terminating the loss share agreements in the third quarter of 2016. Also, there were increases in income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits and income from SBIC private equity investments, partially offset by securities gains recognized in the earlier period.

The allocated provision for credit losses decreased $18 million, primarily due to credit losses for PCI loans. Noninterest expense increased $457 million, primarily due to the first quarter 2017 loss of $392 million on the early extinguishment of higher-cost FHLB advances, as well as higher personnel expense driven by a change in allocation approach for capitalized loan origination costs and higher expense related to assets for certain post-employment benefits. Additionally, 2017 included a $100 million charitable contribution made to BB&T’s philanthropic fund compared to a $50 million charitable contribution in 2016. Other increases to noninterest expense include professional services and software expense, partially offset by an increase in allocated corporate expenses that were allocated to other operating segments, lower merger-related and restructuring charges, and a decline in outside IT services. The benefit for income taxes increased $213 million as the first quarter of 2017 included $35 million of excess tax benefits from equity-based compensation plans and the fourth quarter of 2017 included a net tax benefit of $43 million due to the impact of tax reform.

2016 compared to 2015
Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance

CB-Retail had 2,196 banking offices at the end of 2015,2016, an increase of 30057 offices compared to December 31, 2014.2015. The increase in offices was primarily driven by the acquisition of 41 branches in Texas, 32126 branches with the acquisition of The Bank of Kentucky and 245 branches with the acquisition of Susquehanna Bancshares,National Penn, partially offset by the consolidation of nearby financial centers and the closure of certain lower volume branches within the BB&T branch network.

Community Bankingbranches.


CB-Retail net income was $978 million$1.1 billion in 2015,2016, an increase of $68$181 million, or 7.5%19.1%, compared to 2014. Net income results include2015, primarily driven by the impact of the current year acquisitions as described previously.

National Penn and Susquehanna acquisitions.


Segment net interest income increased $159 million to $3.1 billion, primarily driven by growth in commercial loans and direct retail loans due to organic growth and the acquisitions, partially offset by lower interest rates on new loans and lower funding spreads on deposits.

Noninterest income decreased $18 million driven by lower service charges on deposits, international factoring commissions and letter of credit fees. Intersegment net referral fee income increased $15 million driven by higher loan referrals to the Residential Mortgage Banking segment and higher capital markets referrals to the Financial Services segment.

The allocated provision for credit losses decreased $56 million as a result of lower commercial and retail loan net charge-offs. Noninterest expense increased $89 million driven by higher salary, incentive, pension and franchise tax expense as well as higher merger-related charges. The increase in salary expense reflects the acquisition activity. Allocated corporate expense increased $21 million driven by internal business initiatives.

Residential Mortgage Banking

Residential Mortgage Banking net income was $244 million in 2015, an increase of $40 million, or 19.6%, compared to 2014. Mortgage originations totaled $18.1 billion in 2015, an increase of $706 million compared to $17.4 billion in 2014. BB&T’s residential mortgage servicing portfolio, which includes both retained loans and loans serviced for others, totaled $122.2 billion at the end of 2015, compared to $122.3 billion at December 31, 2014.

Segment net interest income decreased $46 million to $452 million, primarily the result of lower loans HFI balances reflecting the current strategy of selling substantially all conforming mortgage loan production, partially offset by higher credit spreads. Noninterest income increased $45 million, driven by higher gains on residential mortgage loan production and sales and an increase in net MSR income, primarily due to improved MSR hedging results.

The allocated provision for credit losses reflected a charge of $9 million in 2015, compared to a benefit of $107 million in 2014, partially attributable to stabilization in the rate of improvement in credit trends. Earlier period results reflect the impact of loan sales that generated a combined $66 million in gains through the release of the related ALLL. Noninterest expense decreased $184 million, primarily due to prior-year adjustments totaling $118 million relating to the previously discussed FHA-insured loan exposures and a $27 million prior-year charge related to a review of mortgage processes. The decrease in noninterest expense was also partially attributable to lower costs associated with repurchased loans. 

Dealer Financial Services

Dealer Financial Services net income was $180 million in 2015, a decrease of $3 million, or 1.6%, compared to 2014.

39

Segment net interest income increased $53 million to $728$489 million, primarily driven by growth in the Dealer Financeacquisition activity, average deposit and Regional Acceptance loan portfolios, the inclusion of dealer floor plan loans in the segment results beginning in the first quarter of 2015 and the acquisition of Susquehanna’s consumer auto leasing business.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $17 million, primarily due to higher charge-offs. Noninterest expense increased $37 million driven by higher personnel, professional services, loan processing and other expenses.

Dealer Financial Services grew average loans by $911 million, or 7.1%, compared to 2014 as a result of strong growth in the prime and nonprime auto lending businesses and the acquisition of Susquehanna’s consumer auto leasing business.

Specialized Lending

Specialized Lending net income was $268 million in 2015, an increase of $11 million, or 4.3%, compared to 2014.

Segment net interest income increased $33 million to $465 million, driven by strong growth in small ticket consumer loans and the acquisition of Susquehanna’s small business equipment finance portfolio, partially offset by lower rates on new loans. Noninterest income increased $39 million driven by higher commercial mortgage and operating lease income.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $9 million, primarily due to higher net charge-offs in the small ticket consumer and commercial finance loan portfolios. Noninterest expense increased $45 million, primarily due to higher personnel expense and higher depreciation of property under operating leases.

Specialized Lending grew average loans by $2.0 billion, or 12.7%, compared to 2014 as a result of strong growth in small ticket consumer, commercial mortgage and governmental finance loans and the acquisition of the small business equipment finance portfolio.

Insurance Services

Insurance Services net income was $182 million in 2015, a decrease of $51 million, or 21.9%, compared to 2014.

Insurance Service’s noninterest income of $1.6 billion decreased $55 million, which primarily reflects lower direct commercial property and casualty insurance premiums due to the previously discussed sale of American Coastal, partially offset by higher new and renewal commercial property and casualty insurance business.

Noninterest expense increased $2 million driven by higher salary, employee insurance and pension expense as well as higher merger-related charges, partially offset by lower business referral and insurance claims expense. Allocated corporate expenses increased $13 million primarily due to the centralization of certain corporate support functions during mid-2014.

Financial Services

Financial Services net income was $319 million in 2015, an increase of $37 million, or 13.1%, compared to 2014.

Segment net interest income increased $80 million to $526 million, driven by Corporate Banking and BB&T Wealth loan and deposit growth, partially offset by lower rates on new loans. Noninterest income increased $68 million as a result of higher investment commissions and brokerage fees, trust and investment advisory fees, commercial unused commitment fees and income from SBIC private equity investments. Client invested assets totaled $130.6 billion as of December 31, 2015, an increase of $11.7 billion, or 9.8%, compared to 2014.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $40 million as a result of the Corporate Banking loan growth, portfolio mix and risk expectations related to the oil and energy sector. Noninterest expense increased $46 million compared to 2014, driven by higher salary, incentive, pension and professional services expense.

Financial Services continues to generate significant loan growth through expanded lending strategies, with Corporate Banking’s average loan balances increasing $2.6 billion, or 28.4%, compared to 2014, while BB&T Wealth’s average loan balances increased $367 million, or 32.7%. BB&T Wealth also grew transaction account balances by $595 million, or 21.5%, and money market and savings balances by $974 million, or 14.5%, compared to 2014, partially attributable to the ongoing identification and servicing of wealth clients in the Community Bank.

40

Other, Treasury & Corporate

Other, Treasury & Corporate generated a net loss of $48 million in 2015, compared to net income of $137 million in 2014.

Segment net interest income decreased $62 million to $339 million, driven by lower average PCI loan balances as well as lower yields on the securities portfolio, partially offset by higher funding spreads on deposits. Noninterest income increased $79 million, primarily due to improved FDIC loss share income, partially offset by the loss on the previously discussed sale of American Coastal.

The allocated provision for credit losses reflected a benefit of $15 million in 2015, compared to a benefit of $66 million in 2014, primarily due to a release in the RUFC in the earlier period driven by improvements related to the mix of unfunded lending exposures and a lower provision benefit for PCI loans attributable to improvements in credit quality in the earlier period.

Noninterest expense increased $365 million, driven by higher salary, employee insurance and pension expense, partially attributable to the Susquehanna acquisition, as well as higher IT professional services and software expense, franchise taxes and merger-related charges. In addition, noninterest expense for the current year includes the previously discussed $172 million loss on early extinguishment of FHLB advances, compared to a similar loss of $122 million in the prior year. Intersegment net referral fee expenses decreased $22 million driven largely by higher mortgage loan referrals shared by other segments. Amortization of intangibles increased $25 million primarily due to core deposit intangible amortization for acquisitions occurring during 2015. Allocated corporate expense decreased $53 million compared to the earlier period as a result of higher expense allocations to the other segments related to internal business initiatives and the continued centralization of certain support functions into the respective allocated corporate centers.

2014 compared to 2013

Community Banking

Community Banking had a network of 1,839 banking offices at the end of 2014, an increase of 14 offices compared to December 31, 2013. During the second quarter of 2014, BB&T completed the acquisition of 21 branches in Texas, which included $1.2 billion in deposits and $112 million in loans. The increase in offices was primarily driven by the acquisition, partially offset by the closure of certain lower volume branches.

Community Banking net income was $910 million in 2014, an increase of $26 million, or 2.9%, compared to 2013. Segment net interest income totaled $2.9 billion, a decrease of $134 million compared to 2013, primarily due to lower yields on new loans and lower funding spreads earned on deposits, partially offset by loan and noninterest-bearing deposit growth.lower credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income of $1.2 billion increased $4$12 million, primarily due to higher service charges on deposits, checkcard fees and bankcard fees.

and merchant discounts, partially offset by a decline in mortgage banking income.



The allocated provision for credit losses increased $110 million, primarily due to a decline in the rate of improvement in credit trends, higher net charge-offs and loan growth. Noninterest expense increased $112 million, primarily driven by higher personnel expense, allocated corporate expenses, occupancy and equipment expense, and amortization of intangibles, all of which increased primarily due to acquisition activity. The increases were partially offset by a decline in operating charge-offs due to a net benefit of $73 million in 2016 related to the settlement of certain legacy mortgage matters involving the origination of mortgage loans insured by the FHA, a decline in loan-related expense due to a $31 million release of mortgage repurchase reserves in 2016, and lower professional services.

CB-Retail average loans and leases HFI increased $4.7 billion, or 8.0%, compared to the prior year primarily due to acquisition activity. Average residential mortgage loans increased $62 million, or 0.2%, average indirect loans grew $1.1 billion, or 6.7%, and average direct loans increased $2.7 billion, or 30.5%, primarily due to acquisitions.

Community Banking Commercial

CB-Commercial net income was $735 million in 2016, an increase of $154 million, or 26.5%, compared to 2015, primarily driven by acquisitions.

Segment net interest income increased $339 million, primarily driven by acquisition activity, average loan and deposit growth and higher funding spreads on deposits, partially offset by lower credit spreads on loans.

The allocated provision for credit losses decreased $156$41 million, driven byprimarily due to lower businessnet charge-offs and consumer loan charge-offs, partially offset by stabilizationan improvement in loss factors.credit trends. Noninterest expense totaled $1.4 billion for 2014. The $145 million decrease was primarily attributable to lower personnel, occupancy and equipment and professional services expense and lower restructuring charges. Intersegment net referral fees decreased $58 million driven by lower mortgage banking referrals. Allocated corporate expenses increased $81$149 million, primarily driven by internal business initiatives, including the implementationhigher personnel expense, allocated corporate expenses and amortization of the ERP system.

Residential Mortgage Banking

Residential Mortgage Bankingintangibles, all of which increased primarily due to acquisition activity.


CB-Commercial average loans and leases HFI increased $8.0 billion, or 19.6%, primarily driven by acquisition activity.

Financial Services and Commercial Finance
FS&CF net income was $204$376 million in 2014, a decrease2016, an increase of $179$15 million, or 46.7%4.2%, compared to 2013. Mortgage originations totaled $17.4 billion in 2014, a decrease of $14.2 billion compared to $31.6 billion in 2013. BB&T’s residential mortgage servicing portfolio, which includes both retained loans and loans serviced for others, totaled $122.3 billion at the end of 2014, compared to $121.2 billion at the end of 2013.

2015.


Segment net interest income decreased $87 million to $498increased $100 million, primarily the result of lower average loan balances. Noninterest income decreased $171 million driven by lower gainshigher loan and deposit balances and higher funding spreads on residential mortgage loan sales due to lower origination volume and tighter pricing due to competitive factors. This decrease wasdeposits, partially offset by an increase in net servicinglower credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income of $31increased $102 million, primarily due to slower prepayment speedsdriven by higher trust and a $2.8 billion, or 3.2%, increase in the investor-owned servicing portfolio.

41
investment advisory revenues, commercial mortgage banking income, client and derivative income, operating lease income and investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions.

The allocated provision for credit losses was a benefit of $107 million in 2014, compared to expense of $12 million in 2013, reflecting the benefit of the previously discussed sales of residential mortgage loans during 2014 and a decrease in loan balances consistent with the current strategy of selling substantially all conforming mortgage loan production. Noninterest expense increased $141 million, which primarily reflects a $27 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2014 related to the previously discussed ongoing review of mortgage processes, as well as adjustments in the second quarter of 2014 totaling $118 million related to the previously discussed FHA-insured loan exposures.

Dealer Financial Services

Dealer Financial Services net income was $183 million in 2014, a decrease of $21 million, or 10.3%, compared to 2013.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $23$61 million, primarily due todriven by higher net charge-offs inwithin the nonprime automobileenergy sector for the Corporate Banking loan portfolio as credit trends in that portfolio continue to normalize.portfolio. Noninterest expense increased $8 million, driven by higher personnel expense, primarily related to Regional Acceptance Corporation’s geographic expansion, and operating charge-offs.

Dealer Financial Services grew average loans by $1.1 billion, or 10.5%, compared to 2013 as a result of strong growth in both the prime and nonprime auto lending businesses.

Specialized Lending

Specialized Lending net income was $257 million in 2014, a decrease of $16 million, or 5.9%, compared to 2013.

Segment net interest income decreased $120 million to $432 million, which primarily reflects the sale of a consumer lending subsidiary during the fourth quarter of 2013 and lower credit spreads on loans earned during 2014. Noninterest income increased $10 million driven by higher operating lease income.

The sale of the specialized lending subsidiary also had a beneficial impact on the allocated provision for credit losses, which decreased $46 million. Noninterest expense decreased $34 million driven by lower personnel, occupancy and equipment, loan processing and professional services expense.

Small ticket consumer finance, equipment finance, governmental finance and commercial mortgage experienced strong loan growth compared to 2013.

Insurance Services

Insurance Services net income was $233 million in 2014, an increase of $46 million, or 24.6%, compared to 2013.

Insurance Services’ noninterest income of $1.7 billion increased $128 million, primarily due to increased commissions on new and renewal property and casualty business, higher performance-based commissions and an increase in employee benefit commissions. Noninterest expense increased $54 million driven by higher salaries, performance-based incentives, operating charge-offs and business referral expense.

Financial Services

Financial Services net income was $282 million in 2014, a decrease of $23 million, or 7.5%, compared to 2013.

Noninterest income increased $22 million, primarily due to higher trust, investment advisory and investment banking income. Client invested assets totaled $119.0 billion as of December 31, 2014, an increase of $7.8 billion, or 7.0%, compared to 2013.

The allocated provision for credit losses increased $7 million compared to the prior year as a result of growth in the Corporate Banking and BB&T Wealth loan portfolios. Noninterest expense increased $30$121 million, primarily due to higher personnel expense, depreciation on property held under operating charge-offs, sub-advisory fees and occupancy and equipment expense. Allocatedleases, allocated corporate expenses increased $19 million, primarily driven by internal business initiatives and growth in the segment.

Financial Services continued to generate significantmerger-related and restructuring charges.


FS&CF generated strong loan growth, through expanded lending strategies.with Corporate Banking’s average loan balances increased $1.7loans HFI increasing $2.1 billion, or 23.4%17.6%, compared to 2013,2015, while BB&T Wealth’s average loan balancesloans HFI increased $229$213 million, or 25.6%14.3%. Corporate Banking’s average transaction account deposits grew $495 million, or 31.3%, while BB&T Wealth also grew transaction account balances by $438$743 million, or 18.8%19.9%, and money market and savings balances by $534$808 million, or 8.6%10.5%, compared to 2013.

42
2015, partially attributable to the ongoing identification and servicing of wealth clients in CB-Retail. Client invested assets totaled $143.7 billion as of December 31, 2016, an increase of $13.1 billion, or 10.0%, compared to 2015. Average loans HFI at Grandbridge increased $448 million, or 53.5%, compared to 2015 and increased 12.9% and 5.0%, respectively, for Equipment Finance and Governmental Finance.

Other, Treasury & Corporate

Other, Treasury & Corporate

Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance
IH&PF net income was $137$166 million in 20142016, a decrease of $28 million, or 14.4%, compared to a2015.

Noninterest income increased $120 million, which primarily reflects the acquisition of Swett and Crawford and higher property and casualty insurance commissions, employee benefit commissions and life insurance commissions, partially offset by the sale of American Coastal in the second quarter of 2015.

Noninterest expense increased $154 million, primarily due to higher personnel expense and amortization of intangibles, which were driven by the Swett and Crawford acquisition. In addition, allocated corporate expenses increased. These increases were partially offset by lower business referral and insurance claims expense driven by the sale of American Coastal.

Other, Treasury and Corporate

OT&C net loss of $506income was $36 million in 2013. Results in the prior year include $5162016, a decrease of $3 million, in adjustments for uncertain income tax positions as previously discussed.

or 7.7%, compared to 2015.


Segment net interest income increased $103 million to $401decreased $203 million, primarily due to an increasethe inclusion of Susquehanna for a portion of the prior year and higher funding spreads credited to segments with deposits, partially offset by growth in the securities portfolio and the inclusion of National Penn for part of 2016.

Noninterest income increased $217 million, which reflects improved FDIC loss share income primarily due to the early termination in the third quarter of 2016, securities gains on the investment portfolio lower funding creditsin 2016, the 2015 loss on deposits allocated to Community Bankingsale of American Coastal and Financial Services and lower corporate borrowing costs,higher bank-owned life insurance income, partially offset by runoff in the PCI loan portfolio.

lower income from SBIC private equity investments.


Noninterest incomeexpense decreased $170$81 million, primarily due to lower securities gains in the investment portfolio, lower FDICa $172 million loss share income, the sale of a consumer lending subsidiary during the fourth quarter of 2013 and lower income from assets related to certain post-employment benefits.

The allocated provision for credit losses was a benefit of $66 million compared to a benefit of $16 million in 2013. Results from 2014 included a $29 million benefit for loans acquired from the FDIC and a $29 million reduction in the reserve for unfunded lending commitments driven by improvements related to the mix of lines of credit, letters of credit, and bankers’ acceptances. Noninterest expense increased $36 million, primarily due to $122 million in expense related toon early extinguishment of FHLB debt in 2015, the inclusion of Susquehanna for a portion of 2015, and an increase in allocated corporate expenses that were allocated to the operating segments. These declines were partially offset by higher personnel expense, occupancy and equipment expense, outside IT services and merger-relatedsoftware expense, partially offsetas well as higher regulatory charges and donations and contributions driven by lower personnel, professional services andthe $50 million charitable contribution made in 2016. The benefit for income taxes fell $83 million, primarily driven by a $107 million tax and license expense. Intersegment net referral fee expense decreased $59 millionbenefit in 2015 as a result of a lower leveldecision by the U.S. Court of mortgage banking referral income that was allocatedAppeals related to both Community Banking and Financial Services.

previously disallowed deductions in connection with a financing transaction.


Analysis of Financial Condition

Investment Activities

BB&T’s board-approved investment policy is carried out by the MRLCC, which meets regularly to review the economic environment and establish investment strategies. The MRLCC also has much broader responsibilities, which are discussed in the “Market"Market Risk Management”Management" section in “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” herein.

Operations."

Investment strategies are reviewed by the MRLCC based on the interest rate environment, balance sheet mix, actual and anticipated loan demand, funding opportunities and the overall interest rate sensitivity of the Company. In general, the goals of the investment portfolio are: (i) to provide a sufficient margin of liquid assets to meet unanticipated deposit and loan fluctuations and overall funds management objectives; (ii) to provide eligible securities to secure public funds, trust deposits as prescribed by law and other borrowings; and (iii) to earn the maximuman optimal return on funds invested that is commensurate with meeting the requirements of (i) and (ii).

and consistent with our risk appetite.

Branch Bank invests in securities allowable under bank regulations. These securities may include obligations of the U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agencies, GSEs (including MBS), bank eligible obligations of any state or political subdivision, non-agency MBS, structured notes, bank eligible corporate obligations (including corporate debentures), commercial paper, negotiable CDs, bankers acceptances, mutual funds and limited types of equity securities. Branch Bank also may deal in securities subject to the provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. BB&T’s full-service brokerage and investment banking subsidiary engages in the underwriting, trading and sales of equity and debt securities subject to the risk management policies of the Company.

43

The following table provides information regarding the composition of the securities portfolio for the years presented:
              
Table 11
Composition of Securities Portfolio
              
     December 31, 
��    2015 2014 2013 
              
     (Dollars in millions) 
 AFS securities (at fair value):         
  U.S. Treasury$ 1,832  $ 1,231  $ 595  
  GSE  51    ―      ―    
  Agency MBS  20,046    16,154    17,929  
  States and political subdivisions  2,079    1,974    1,851  
  Non-agency MBS  221    264    291  
  Other  4    41    45  
  Acquired from FDIC  1,064    1,243    1,393  
 Total AFS securities  25,297    20,907    22,104  
            
 HTM securities (at amortized cost):         
  U.S. Treasury  1,097    1,096    392  
  GSE  5,045    5,394    5,603  
  Agency MBS  12,267    13,120    11,636  
  States and political subdivisions  63    22    33  
  Other  58    608    437  
 Total HTM securities  18,530    20,240    18,101  
 Total securities$ 43,827  $ 41,147  $ 40,205  


The following table provides information regarding the composition of the securities portfolio for the years presented:
Table 9
Composition of Securities Portfolio
   
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
AFS securities (at fair value):      
U.S. Treasury $2,291
 $2,587
 $1,832
GSE 179
 180
 51
Agency MBS 20,101
 21,264
 20,046
States and political subdivisions 1,392
 2,205
 2,375
Non-agency MBS 576
 679
 989
Other 8
 11
 4
Total AFS securities 24,547

26,926

25,297
HTM securities (at amortized cost):  
  
  
U.S. Treasury 1,098
 1,098
 1,097
GSE 2,198
 2,197
 5,045
Agency MBS 19,660
 13,225
 12,267
States and political subdivisions 28
 110
 63
Other 43
 50
 58
Total HTM securities 23,027

16,680

18,530
Total securities $47,574

$43,606

$43,827

The securities portfolio totaled $43.8$47.6 billion at December 31, 2015,2017, compared to $41.1$43.6 billion at December 31, 2014.2016. The increase was driven by higher AFSin the overall portfolio balances, primarilywas due to new purchases of agency MBS and U.S. Treasury securities duringreinvestments in the year.

HTM portfolio. A change in the mix between AFS and HTM also contributed to the increase in HTM securities.

As of December 31, 2015,2017, approximately 12.4%5.8% of the securities portfolio was variable rate, compared to 14.0%7.5% as of December 31, 2014.2016. The effective duration of the securities portfolio was 4.04.7 years at December 31, 2015,2017, compared to 3.94.8 years at the end of 2014.2016. The duration of the securities portfolio excludes equity securities auction rate securities, and certain non-agency MBS acquired from the FDIC.

Agency MBS represented 73.7%83.6% of the total securities portfolio at year-end 2015,2017, compared to 71.1%79.1% as of prior year end. As of December 31, 2015, the AFS securities portfolio also includes $1.1 billion of securities that were acquired from the FDIC as part of the Colonial acquisition. Effective October 1, 2014, securities subject to the commercial loss sharing agreement with the FDIC related to the Colonial acquisition were no longer subject to loss sharing; however, any gains on the sale of these securities through September 30, 2017 would be shared with the FDIC. Since these securities are in a significant unrealized gain position, they are effectively covered as any declines in the unrealized gains of the securities down to a contractually specified amount would reduce the liability to the FDIC at the applicable percentage. Securities acquired from the FDIC consisted of $768 million of non-agency MBS and $296 million of states and political subdivisions securities as of December 31, 2015.

BB&T transferred $517 million of HTM securities to AFS during the third quarter of 2015. These securities, which were sold by the end of the third quarter, represented investments in student loans for which there was a significant increase in risk weighting as a result of the implementation of Basel III.

BB&T recognized $4 million in OTTI charges for 2015 and $6 million in OTTI charges for 2014.

Refer to Note 3 “Securities” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein"Note 2. Securities" for additional disclosures related to the evaluation of securities for OTTI.


The following table presents the securities portfolio at December 31, 2017, segregated by major category with ranges of maturities and average yields disclosed:
Table 10
Securities Yields By Major Category and Maturity
   
  December 31, 2017
  AFS HTM
(Dollars in millions) Fair Value Effective Yield (1) Amortized Cost Effective Yield (1)
U.S. Treasury:        
Within one year $307
 1.21% $
 %
One to five years 246
 1.53
 1,098
 2.30
Five to ten years 1,738
 1.52
 
 
Total 2,291
 1.48
 1,098
 2.30
GSE:  
  
  
  
One to five years 26
 1.45
 1,136
 2.35
Five to ten years 141
 1.55
 1,062
 2.21
After ten years 12
 2.69
 
 
Total 179
 1.61
 2,198
 2.29
Agency MBS: (2)  
  
  
  
One to five years 1
 2.09
 
 
Five to ten years 16
 2.64
 31
 2.09
After ten years 20,084
 2.23
 19,629
 2.56
Total 20,101
 2.23
 19,660
 2.56
States and political subdivisions: (3)  
  
  
  
Within one year 20
 4.96
 
 
One to five years 223
 5.05
 2
 1.72
Five to ten years 446
 4.45
 18
 1.28
After ten years 703
 6.03
 8
 1.59
Total 1,392
 5.35
 28
 1.40
Non-agency MBS: (2)  
  
  
  
After ten years 576
 18.96
 
 
Total 576
 18.96
 
 
Other:  
  
  
  
Within one year 8
 1.09
 
 
One to five years 
 
 1
 2.03
After ten years 
 
 42
 2.79
Total 8
 1.09
 43
 2.78
Total securities $24,547
 2.73
 $23,027
 2.52
44
(1)Yields represent interest computed using the effective interest method on a TE basis using marginal income tax rates and the amortized cost of the securities.

The following table presents the securities portfolio at December 31, 2015, segregated by major category with ranges of maturities and average yields disclosed:
                 
Table 12
Securities
                 
     December 31, 2015 
     AFS  HTM 
        Effective    Effective 
     Fair Value Yield (1) Amortized Cost Yield (1) 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 U.S. Treasury:            
  Within one year$ 246   0.49 % $ ―     ―   % 
  One to five years  1,392   1.29     1,097   2.21   
  Five to ten years  194   2.02     ―     ―     
   Total  1,832   1.26     1,097   2.21   
                 
 GSE:            
  One to five years  ―     ―       1,000   1.56   
  Five to ten years  51   2.14     4,045   2.21   
   Total  51   2.14     5,045   2.08   
                 
 Agency MBS: (2)            
  One to five years  10   3.82     ―     ―     
  Five to ten years  18   2.34     ―     ―     
  After ten years  20,018   1.81     12,267   2.11   
   Total  20,046   1.81     12,267   2.11   
                 
 States and political subdivisions: (3)            
  Within one year  12   6.93     ―     ―     
  One to five years  79   6.27     ―     ―     
  Five to ten years  620   5.65     17   1.33   
  After ten years  1,368   6.30     46   0.98   
   Total  2,079   6.11     63   1.07   
                 
 Non-agency MBS: (2)            
  After ten years  221   7.96     ―     ―     
   Total  221   7.96     ―     ―     
                 
 Other:            
  Within one year  4   0.48     1   1.29   
  After ten years  ―     ―       57   1.69   
   Total  4   0.48     58   1.69   
                 
 Acquired from FDIC:            
  Within one year  2   4.51     ―     ―     
  One to five years  186   3.70     ―     ―     
  Five to ten years  108   4.00     ―     ―     
  After ten years  768   17.72     ―     ―     
   Total  1,064   13.86     ―     ―     
    Total securities$ 25,297   2.68   $ 18,530   2.10   
                 
                 
(1)Yields represent interest computed at the end of the period using the effective interest method on an FTE basis applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% and the amortized cost of the securities.
(2)For purposes of the maturity table, MBS, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been included in maturity groupings based on the contractual maturity. The expected life of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the underlying mortgage loans.
(3)Weighted-average yield excludes the effect of pay-fixed swaps hedging municipal securities.

45
(2)For purposes of the maturity table, MBS, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been included in maturity groupings based on the contractual maturity. The expected life of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the underlying mortgage loans.
(3)Weighted-average yield excludes the effect of pay-fixed swaps hedging municipal securities.

Lending Activities

The primary goal of the BB&T lending function is to help clients achieve their financial goals by providing quality loan products that are fair to the client and profitable to the Company. Management believes that this purpose can best be accomplished by building strong, profitable client relationships over time, with BB&T becoming an important contributor to the prosperity and well-being of its clients. In addition to the importance placed on client knowledge and continuous involvement with clients, BB&T’s lending process incorporates the standards of a consistent company-wide credit culture and an in-depth local market knowledge. Furthermore, the Company employs strict underwriting criteria governing the degree of assumed risk and the diversity of the loan portfolio in terms of type, industry and geographical concentration. In this context, BB&T strives to meet the credit needs of clients in its markets while pursuing a balanced strategy of loan profitability, loan growth and loan quality.

Table 13
Quarterly Average Balances of Loans and Leases
                  
    For the Three Months Ended
    12/31/15 9/30/15 6/30/15 3/31/15 12/31/14
                  
     (Dollars in millions)
Commercial:              
 Commercial and industrial$ 48,047  $ 46,462  $ 42,541  $ 41,448  $ 40,383 
 CRE - income producing properties  13,264    12,514    10,730    10,680    10,681 
 CRE - construction and development  3,766    3,502    2,767    2,734    2,772 
 Dealer floor plan  1,164    1,056    1,010    1,040    1,053 
Direct retail lending  10,896    9,926    8,449    8,191    8,085 
Sales finance  10,533    10,386    9,507    9,458    9,194 
Revolving credit  2,458    2,421    2,365    2,385    2,427 
Residential mortgage  30,334    30,384    29,862    30,427    31,046 
Other lending subsidiaries  13,281    12,837    11,701    11,318    11,351 
PCI  1,070    1,052    1,055    1,156    1,309 
 Total average loans and leases HFI  134,813    130,540    119,987    118,837    118,301 
LHFS  1,377    1,959    2,069    1,398    1,611 
 Total average loans and leases$ 136,190  $ 132,499  $ 122,056  $ 120,235  $ 119,912 


During 2017, the classification of certain loans, primarily those previously categorized as other lending subsidiaries, was revised to better reflect the nature of the underlying loans. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Table 11
Quarterly Average Balances of Loans and Leases
   
  For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions) 12/31/2017 9/30/2017 6/30/2017 3/31/2017 12/31/2016
Commercial:          
Commercial and industrial $58,478
 $58,211
 $58,150
 $57,125
 $57,226
CRE 20,998
 20,776
 20,304
 19,892
 19,830
Lease financing 1,851
 1,732
 1,664
 1,653
 1,570
Retail:          
Residential mortgage 28,559
 28,924
 29,392
 29,701
 30,044
Direct 11,901
 11,960
 12,000
 12,014
 12,046
Indirect 17,426
 17,678
 18,127
 18,137
 18,041
Revolving credit 2,759
 2,668
 2,612
 2,607
 2,608
PCI 689
 742
 825
 883
 974
Total loans and leases HFI 142,661
 142,691
 143,074
 142,012
 142,339
LHFS 1,428
 1,490
 1,253
 1,686
 2,230
Total loans and leases $144,089
 $144,181
 $144,327
 $143,698
 $144,569
Average loans held for investment for the fourth quarter of 20152017 were $134.8$142.7 billion, up $4.3 billiondown $30 million, or 0.1 percent annualized compared to the third quarter of 2015. Excluding acquisitions (which comprises Susquehanna, The Bank of Kentucky, both branch acquisitions in Texas and BankAtlantic), average loans held for investment were up approximately 2.0% on an annualized basis.

2017.


Average commercial and industrial loans increased $1.6 billion during the fourth quarter of 2015. Approximately $740$267 million, of the increase was the result of acquisitions while the remaining increase primarily reflects continued growth in large corporate lending.average CRE increased $222 million. Average commercial real estate – income producing properties loanslease financing increased $750$119 million and average commercial real estate – construction and development loans increased $264 million, with the majority of both of these increases being attributable to acquisitions. Dealer floor plan average loans, which were not significantly impacted by acquisition activity, were up $108 million or 40.6% annualized, due to strong organic growth.

Direct retail lending average loansproduction from our leasing businesses. Average revolving credit increased $970 million; approximately $735$91 million, of the growth wasprimarily due to acquisitions. Other lending subsidiaries average loans increased $444 million, with approximately half of the increase due to acquisitions.

Excluding acquisition activity, average sales finance loans declined approximately $400 million, which is partially due to dealer pricing structure changes implemented during the third quarter. seasonal spending.


Average residential mortgage loans decreased approximately $430$365 million excluding acquisitions, which reflectsas the continued strategymajority of conforming loans continue to sell conforming residential mortgage loan production.

be sold in the secondary market. In addition, average indirect loans decreased $252 million, primarily due to strategic optimization and directing investments toward higher-yielding assets.


The following table excludes sales finance and retail other lending subsidiariespresents loans as the substantial majority of those loans have fixedwith variable interest rates:

Table 12
Variable Rate Loans (Excluding PCI and LHFS)
        
December 31, 2017 Outstanding Balance Wtd. Avg. Contractual Rate Wtd. Avg. Remaining Term (1)
(Dollars in millions)   
Commercial:       
Commercial and industrial $38,562
 3.13% 4.1
yrs
CRE 16,046
 3.94
 4.0
 
Lease financing 133
 3.22
 5.6
 
Retail:  
  
  
 
Residential mortgage 5,148
 3.62
 24.4
 
Direct 9,777
 4.43
 8.0
 
Indirect 20
 4.06
 NM
 
Revolving credit 2,552
 10.86
 NM
 
46
(1)Commercial and industrial loans and direct loans totaling $1.7 billion and $100 million, respectively, have been excluded from the weighted average remaining term because they are callable on demand.

Table 14
Variable Rate Loans (Excluding PCI and LHFS)
               
 December 31, 2015 Outstanding Balance Wtd. Avg. Contractual Rate Wtd. Avg. Remaining Term 
               
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:          
  Commercial and industrial $ 33,927   2.39 %  2.9 yrs 
  CRE - income producing properties   9,984   3.14    4.5   
  CRE - construction and development   3,356   3.44    3.1   
  Dealer floor plan (1)   1,215   1.91   NM  
  Other lending subsidiaries   528   2.68    2.7   
 Retail:          
  Direct retail lending (2)   9,060   3.45    8.4   
  Revolving credit   2,194   9.35   NM  
  Residential mortgage   6,412   3.42    24.9   
               
               
 (1)The weighted average remaining term for dealer floor plan is excluded as the balance primarily represents loans that are callable on demand. 
 (2)The weighted average remaining term for direct retail lending represents the remaining contractual draw period. Margin loans totaling $94 million have been excluded from the calculation of the weighted average remaining term because they do not have a contractual end date and are callable on demand. 
 NM - not meaningful.  

As of December 31, 2015,2017, approximately 3.3% of the outstanding balance$126 million of variable rate residential mortgage loans isare currently in an interest-only phase. Approximately 94.0%95.0% of these balances will begin amortizing within the next three years. Variable rate residential mortgage loans typically reset every 12 months beginning after a 3 to 10 year fixed period, with an annual cap on rate changes ranging from 2.0% to 6.0%.

As of December 31, 2015,2017, the direct retail lending portfolio includes $6.7$8.5 billion of variable rate home equity lines.lines, $1.0 billion of variable rate other lines of credit and $255 million of variable rate loans. Approximately 74.9%$6.5 billion of the outstanding balance of variable rate home equity lines is currently in the interest-only phase. Approximately 8.8%phase and approximately 9.4% of these balances will begin scheduled amortizationamortizing within the next three years. Approximately $911 million of the outstanding balance of variable rate other lines of credit is in the interest-only phase and 17.0% of these balances will begin amortizing within the next three years. Variable rate home equity lines and other lines of credit typically reset on a monthly basis. Variable rate home equity loans were immaterial as of December 31, 2015.


BB&T monitors the performance of its home equity loans and lines secured by second liens similarsimilarly to other consumer loans and utilizes assumptions specific to these loans in determining the necessary ALLL. BB&T also receives notification when the first lien holder, whether BB&T or another financial institution, has initiated foreclosure proceedings against the borrower. When notified that the first lien is in the process of foreclosure, BB&T obtains valuations to determine if any additional charge-offs or reserves are warranted. These valuations are updated at least annually thereafter.

BB&T has limited ability to monitor the delinquency status of the first lien, unless the first lien is held or serviced by BB&T. As a result, using migration assumptions that are based on historical experience and adjusted for current trends, BB&T estimates the volume of second lien positions where the first lien is delinquent and adjusts the ALLL to reflect the increased risk of loss on these credits. Finally, BB&T also provides additional reserves to second lien positions when the estimated combined current loan to value ratio for the credit exceeds 100%. As of December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T held or serviced the first lien on 32.8%30.4% of its second lien positions.

BB&T lends to a diverse customer base that is substantially located within the Company’s primary market area. At the same time, the loan portfolio is geographically dispersed throughout BB&T’s branch network to mitigate concentration risk arising from local and regional economic downturns. Refer to the "Risk Management" section for a discussion of each of the loan portfolios and the credit risk management policies used to manage the portfolios.

The following table summarizes the loan portfolio:
Table 13
Composition of Loan and Lease Portfolio
   
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Commercial:          
Commercial and industrial $59,153
 $57,739
 $53,746
 $46,110
 $42,954
CRE 21,263
 19,764
 18,312
 14,128
 13,042
Lease financing 1,911
 1,677
 1,535
 1,119
 1,125
Retail:          
Residential mortgage (1) 28,725
 29,921
 30,533
 31,090
 24,648
Direct (1) 11,891
 12,092
 11,140
 8,146
 15,869
Indirect 17,235
 18,564
 17,053
 15,616
 13,841
Revolving credit 2,872
 2,655
 2,510
 2,460
 2,403
PCI 651
 910
 1,122
 1,215
 2,035
Total loans and leases HFI 143,701

143,322

135,951

119,884

115,917
LHFS 1,099
 1,716
 1,035
 1,423
 1,222
Total loans and leases $144,800

$145,038

$136,986

$121,307

$117,139
(1) During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion of loans were transferred from direct lending to residential mortgage.

Loans and leases HFI were $143.7 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $379 million compared to the prior year.

Commercial and industrial loans were up $1.4 billion and CRE loans were up $1.5 billion.

Residential mortgage loans declined $1.2 billion as the majority of conforming loan production continues to be sold in the secondary market. Indirect loans were down $1.3 billion, primarily due to strategic optimization and directing investments into higher yielding assets.

The PCI loan portfolio, which totaled $651 million at December 31, 2017, continued to run off during the year.

The majority of loans are with clients in domestic market areas, which are primarily concentrated in the Southeastern United States. International loans were immaterial as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Scheduled repayments are reported in the maturity category in which the payment is due. Determinations of maturities are based on contract terms. BB&T’s credit policy typically does not permit automatic renewal of loans. At the scheduled maturity date (including balloon payment date), the customer generally must request a new loan to replace the matured loan and execute either a new note or note modification with rate, terms and conditions negotiated at that time.

BB&T lends to a diverse customer base that is substantially located within the Company’s primary market area. At the same time, the loan portfolio is geographically dispersed throughout BB&T’s branch network to mitigate concentration risk arising from local and regional economic downturns. Refer to the “Risk Management” section herein for a discussion of each of the loan portfolios and the credit risk management policies used to manage the portfolios.

47

The following table presents the loan portfolio based upon BB&T’s BUs:

Table 15
Composition of Loan and Lease Portfolio Based on BU
                   
    December 31, 
    2015 2014 2013  2012  2011  
                   
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:               
  Commercial and industrial$ 48,430  $ 41,454  $ 38,508  $ 38,295  $ 36,415  
  CRE—income producing properties  13,421    10,722    10,228    9,861    8,860  
  CRE—construction and development  3,732    2,735    2,382    2,861    3,890  
  Dealer floor plan  1,215    1,091    904    431    345  
 Direct retail lending (1)  11,140    8,146    15,869    15,817    14,506  
 Sales finance  10,327    9,509    8,478    7,305    7,056  
 Revolving credit  2,510    2,460    2,403    2,330    2,212  
 Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed (1)  29,663    30,107    23,513    23,189    20,057  
 Residential mortgage-government guaranteed  870    983    1,135    1,083    524  
 Other lending subsidiaries  13,521    11,462    10,462    10,137    8,737  
 PCI  1,122    1,215    2,035    3,294    4,867  
  Total loans and leases HFI  135,951    119,884    115,917    114,603    107,469  
 LHFS  1,035    1,423    1,222    3,761    3,736  
  Total loans and leases$ 136,986  $ 121,307  $ 117,139  $ 118,364  $ 111,205  
                   
                   
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion of loans were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage.

Total loans and leases were $137.0 billion at year-end 2015, an increase of $15.7 billion compared to the balance at year-end 2014. This increase reflects broad-based loan growth along with the impact of acquisitions, which contributed $14.2 billion in loans as of the respective acquisition dates. Commercial and industrial loans were up $7.0 billion, direct retail lending loans were up $3.0 billion, CRE-income producing properties loans were up $2.7 billion and other lending subsidiaries loans were up $2.1 billion. A $557 million decline in residential mortgage balances reflects the continued strategy to sell conforming residential mortgage loan production.

The increase in commercial and industrial loans reflects the previously mentioned acquisition activity as well as solid growth from large corporate clients, which typically have strong credit profiles and therefore put downward pressure on pricing. The yield on commercial and industrial loans declined to 3.21% in 2015 from 3.35% in 2014.

The PCI loan portfolio, which totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2015, continued to runoff during the year, partially offset by the addition of $403 million of PCI loans in connection with the Susquehanna acquisition.

The majority of BB&T’s loans are with clients in domestic market areas, which are primarily concentrated in the southeastern United States. International loans were immaterial as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio based on regulatory classifications, which focuses on the underlying loan collateral, and differs from internal classifications presented herein that focus on the primary purpose of the loan.

48

TableofContents

Table 16
Composition of Loan and Lease Portfolio
                   
    December 31, 
    2015 2014 2013  2012  2011  
                   
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial, financial and agricultural$ 32,211  $ 27,615  $ 25,260  $ 23,863  $ 21,452  
 Lease receivables  2,497    1,120    1,126    1,114    1,067  
 Real estate-construction and land development  5,621    4,736    4,630    5,900    7,714  
 Real estate-mortgage  70,324    63,464    65,485    65,760    60,821  
 Consumer  24,298    22,949    19,416    17,966    16,415  
  Total loans and leases HFI  135,951    119,884    115,917    114,603    107,469  
 LHFS  1,035    1,423    1,222    3,761    3,736  
  Total loans and leases$ 136,986  $ 121,307  $ 117,139  $ 118,364  $ 111,205  

Table 17
Selected Loan Maturities and Interest Sensitivity
              
     December 31, 2015 
     Commercial, Real Estate:    
     Financial Construction    
     and and Land    
     Agricultural Development Total 
              
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Fixed Rate:         
  1 year or less (1)$ 2,741  $ 421  $ 3,162  
  1-5 years  3,859    443    4,302  
  After 5 years  4,822    772    5,594  
   Total  11,422    1,636    13,058  
 Variable Rate:         
  1 year or less (1)  5,042    946    5,988  
  1-5 years  12,852    2,033    14,885  
  After 5 years  3,895    1,006    4,901  
   Total  21,789    3,985    25,774  
    Total loans and leases (2)$ 33,211  $ 5,621  $ 38,832  
              
              
(1)Includes loans due on demand. 
(2)The above table excludes:   (Dollars in millions) 
 (i)consumer $ 24,298  
 (ii)real estate mortgage   70,324  
 (iii)LHFS   1,035  
 (iv)lease receivables   2,497  
  Total $ 98,154  

Table 14
Commercial Loan Maturities and Interest Sensitivity
 
  December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions) 1 Year or Less Over 1 to 5 Years After 5 Years Total
Fixed rate:        
Commercial and industrial $3,325
 $7,833
 $9,433
 $20,591
CRE 442
 2,783
 1,992
 5,217
Lease financing 73
 1,203
 502
 1,778
Total fixed rate 3,840
 11,819

11,927

27,586
Variable rate:    
  
  
Commercial and industrial 9,295
 19,716
 9,551
 38,562
CRE 2,305
 9,013
 4,728
 16,046
Lease financing 
 56
 77
 133
Total variable rate 11,600
 28,785

14,356

54,741
Total commercial loans and leases $15,440
 $40,604

$26,283

$82,327
Asset Quality

The following discussion includes PCI loans, which are considered performing due to the application of the expected cash flows method and totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2015 and $1.2 billion in the prior year. Foreclosed real estate acquired from the FDIC totaled $26 million and $56 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

NPAs, which include foreclosed real estate, repossessions and NPLs, totaled $712 million at December 31, 2015 compared to $782 million at December 31, 2014. The decline in NPAs of $70 million was driven by decreases of $40 million in NPLs and $30 million in foreclosed real estate and other property.

The decline in NPLs was led by decreases in CRE-income producing properties and CRE-construction and development NPLs of $36 million and $13 million, respectively, due to continued improvement in credit quality.

.

NPAs as a percentage of loans and leases plus foreclosed property were 0.52% at December 31, 2015 compared with 0.65% at December 31, 2014.

49

The following table presents the changes in NPAs (excludes foreclosed property acquired from the FDIC):

Table 18
Rollforward of NPAs
 
       Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 
             
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at beginning of year$ 726  $ 1,053  
  New NPAs  1,266    1,307  
  Advances and principal increases  85    74  
  Disposals of foreclosed assets (1)  (484)   (487) 
  Disposals of NPLs (2)  (165)   (332) 
  Charge-offs and losses  (246)   (309) 
  Payments  (358)   (398) 
  Transfers to performing status  (149)   (192) 
  Other, net  11    10  
 Balance at end of year$ 686  $ 726  
             
           
(1)Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $170 million and $165 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and  2014, respectively.
(2)Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $17 million and $25 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The following tables summarize asset quality information for the past five years. As more fully described below, this information has been adjusted to exclude certain components:

·BB&T has recorded certain amounts related to government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T has the option, but not the obligation, to repurchase and has effectively regained control. These amounts are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets but have been excluded from the asset quality disclosures, as management believes they result in distortion of the reported metrics. The amount of government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that have been excluded are noted in the footnotes to Table 19.

·In addition, BB&T has concluded that the inclusion of PCI in “Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of total loans and leases” may result in significant distortion to this ratio. The inclusion of these loans could result in a lack of comparability across quarters or years, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. BB&T believes that the presentation of this asset quality measure excluding PCI provides additional perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio. Accordingly, the asset quality measures in Table 20 present asset quality information on a consolidated basis as well as “Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of total loans and leases” excluding PCI.

50

 Table 19 
 Asset Quality 
                        
     December 31, 
     2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 
                        
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Nonaccrual loans and leases:                   
  Commercial and industrial$ 237   $ 239   $ 363   $ 545   $ 582  
  CRE - income producing properties  38     74     113     171     275  
  CRE - construction and development  13     26     51     170     495  
  Direct retail lending (1)  43     48     109     132     142  
  Sales finance  7     5     5     7     7  
  Residential mortgage (1)(2)(3)(4)  173     166     243     269     308  
  Other lending subsidiaries (2)(5)  65     58     51     86     63  
 Total nonaccrual loans and leases (3)(4)(5)  576     616     935     1,380     1,872  
  Foreclosed real estate  82     87     71     107     536  
  Foreclosed real estate-acquired from FDIC  26     56     121     254     378  
  Other foreclosed property  28     23     47     49     42  
 Total NPAs (3)(4)(5)$ 712   $ 782   $ 1,174   $ 1,790   $ 2,828  
                        
 Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:                   
  Commercial and industrial$ ―     $ ―     $ ―��    $ 1   $ 2  
  Dealer floor plan  ―       ―       ―       ―       3  
  Direct retail lending (1)  7     12     33     38     56  
  Sales finance  5     5     5     10     15  
  Revolving credit  10     9     10     16     17  
  Residential mortgage (1)  55     83     69     91     103  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed (6)  121     238     296     252     204  
  Other lending subsidiaries  ―       ―       5     10     5  
  PCI  114     188     304     442     736  
 Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing (6)$ 312   $ 535   $ 722   $ 860   $ 1,141  
                        
 Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing:                   
  Commercial and industrial$ 36   $ 23   $ 35   $ 42   $ 85  
  CRE - income producing properties  13     4     8     11     18  
  CRE - construction and development  9     1     2     3     18  
  Dealer floor plan  ―       ―       ―       ―       2  
  Direct retail lending (1)  58     41     132     145     162  
  Sales finance  72     62     56     56     73  
  Revolving credit  22     23     23     23     22  
  Residential mortgage (1)(2)  397     392     454     477     450  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed (7)  75     80     88     84     74  
  Other lending subsidiaries (2)(5)  304     237     221     290     273  
  PCI  42     33     88     135     222  
 Total loans 30 - 89 days past due and still accruing (5)(7)$ 1,028   $ 896   $ 1,107   $ 1,266   $ 1,399  
                        
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, approximately $55 million of nonaccrual loans, $22 million of loans 90 days or more past due and $83 million of loans 30-89 days past due were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage.
(2)During the fourth quarter of 2013, approximately $16 million of nonaccrual loans and $40 million of loans 30-89 days past due were transferred from other lending subsidiaries to residential mortgage.
(3)During the fourth quarter of 2014, approximately $121 million of nonaccrual residential mortgage loans were sold.
(4)During the fourth quarter of 2015, approximately $50 million of nonaccrual residential mortgage loans were sold.
(5)During the fourth quarter of 2013, approximately $9 million of nonaccrual loans and $26 million of loans 30-89 days past due were sold in connection with the sale of a consumer lending subsidiary.
(6)Excludes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T does not have the obligation to repurchase that are 90 days or more past due totaling $365 million, $410 million, $511 million, $517 million and $426 million at December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(7)Excludes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T does not have the obligation to repurchase that are past due 30-89 days totaling $2 million, $2 million, $4 million, $5 million and $7 million at December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

51

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, excluding government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans, totaled $312 million at December 31, 2015, compared with $535 million at year-end 2014, a decline of $223 million. This reduction reflects overall continued improvement in credit quality. Loans 30-89 days past due, excluding government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans, totaled $1.0 billion at December 31, 2015, an increase of $132 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to higher loan balances.

Table 20
Asset Quality Ratios
                    
     As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 
     2015 2014  2013  2012  2011  
 Asset Quality Ratios (including PCI)               
  Loans 30 - 89 days past due and still accruing as a               
   percentage of loans and leases HFI (1) 0.76 %  0.75 %  0.95 %  1.10 %  1.30 % 
  Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a               
   percentage of loans and leases HFI (1) 0.23    0.45    0.62    0.75    1.06   
  NPLs as a percentage of loans and leases HFI 0.42    0.51    0.81    1.20    1.74   
  NPAs as a percentage of:               
   Total assets 0.34    0.42    0.64    0.97    1.62   
   Loans and leases HFI plus foreclosed property 0.52    0.65    1.01    1.56    2.63   
  Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans               
   and leases HFI (2) 0.35    0.46    0.69    1.17    1.60   
  ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases HFI 1.07    1.23    1.49    1.76    2.10   
  Ratio of ALLL to:               
   Net charge-offs (2) 3.36 x  2.74 x  2.19 x  1.56 x  1.36 x 
   NPLs 2.53    2.39    1.85    1.46    1.21   
                    
 Asset Quality Ratios (excluding PCI)(3)               
  Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a               
   percentage of loans and leases HFI (1) 0.15 %  0.29 %  0.37 %  0.38 %  0.39 % 
                    
(1)Excludes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T has the right but not the obligation to repurchase. Refer to the footnotes of Table 19 for amounts related to these loans.
(2)Net charge-offs for 2011 include $236 million related to BB&T’s NPA disposition strategy. In connection with this strategy, approximately $271 million of problem loans were transferred from loans HFI to LHFS in 2011. The disposition of all such loans was complete as of December 31, 2011.
(3)These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of PCI assets. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios.

Potential problem loans include loans on nonaccrual status or past due as disclosed in Table 19.16. In addition, for the commercial portfolio segment, loans that are rated special mention or substandard performing are closely monitored by management as potential problem loans. Refer to Note 4 “Loans"Note 3. Loans and ACL” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” hereinACL" for additional disclosures related to these potential problem loans.

TDRs generally occur when a borrower is experiencing, or is expected to experience, financial difficulties in the near-term. As a result, BB&T will work with the borrower to prevent further difficulties, and ultimately to improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan. To facilitate this process, a concessionary modification that would not otherwise be considered may be granted, resulting in classification of the loan as a TDR. Refer to Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Policies" for additional policy information regarding TDRs.

BB&T’s performing TDRs, excluding government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans,

The following table presents activity related to NPAs. Foreclosed real estate acquired from the FDIC is excluded for periods prior to the loss share termination:
Table 15
Rollforward of NPAs
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year $813
 $686
New NPAs 1,297
 1,716
Advances and principal increases 328
 253
Disposals of foreclosed assets (1) (520) (516)
Disposals of NPLs (2) (212) (302)
Charge-offs and losses (251) (279)
Payments (660) (586)
Transfers to performing status (164) (179)
Foreclosed real estate, included as a result of loss share termination 
 17
Other, net (4) 3
Balance at end of year $627
 $813
(1)Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $236 million and $210 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $33 million and $30 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NPAs, which include foreclosed real estate, repossessions and NPLs, totaled $982$627 million at December 31, 2015, a reduction of $68 million2017 compared to $813 million at December 31, 2016. This decrease consisted of a $166 million decrease in NPLs and a $20 million decrease in foreclosed real estate and other property.

The decrease in NPLs is primarily due to a $110 million decline in commercial and industrial NPLs primarily resulting from payoffs, sales and writedowns. In addition, residential mortgage NPLs were down $43 million largely due to sales.

NPAs as a percentage of loans and leases plus foreclosed property were 0.44% at December 31, 2017 compared with 0.57% at December 31, 2016.

The following tables summarize asset quality information for the prior year. This declinepast five years:
Table 16
Asset Quality
   
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Nonaccrual loans and leases:          
Commercial and industrial (1) $259
 $369
 $242
 $243
 $364
CRE 45
 57
 51
 100
 164
Lease financing 1
 4
 1
 
 
Residential mortgage (2) 129
 172
 173
 166
 243
Direct 64
 63
 43
 48
 109
Indirect 72
 71
 66
 59
 55
Total nonaccrual loans and leases (1)(2) 570

736
 576
 616

935
Foreclosed real estate 32
 50
 108
 143
 192
Other foreclosed property 25
 27
 28
 23
 47
Total NPAs (1)(2) $627

$813
 $712
 $782

$1,174
           
Performing TDRs:          
Commercial and industrial $50
 $57
 $50
 $65
 $78
CRE 16
 25
 29
 57
 89
Residential mortgage (3)(4) 605
 769
 604
 621
 1,161
Direct (4) 62
 67
 72
 84
 187
Indirect 281
 240
 194
 182
 142
Revolving credit 29
 29
 33
 41
 48
Total performing TDRs (3)(4) $1,043
 $1,187
 $982
 $1,050
 $1,705
           
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:  
  
  
  
  
Commercial and industrial $1
 $
 $
 $
 $5
CRE 1
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage 465
 522
 541
 731
 876
Direct 6
 6
 7
 12
 33
Indirect 6
 6
 5
 5
 5
Revolving credit 12
 12
 10
 9
 10
PCI 57
 90
 114
 188
 304
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing $548
 $636
 $677
 $945

$1,233
           
Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing:  
  
  
  
  
Commercial and industrial $41
 $44
 $53
 $37
 $50
CRE 8
 8
 22
 5
 10
Lease financing 4
 4
 1
 
 
Residential mortgage 472
 525
 475
 474
 546
Direct 65
 60
 58
 41
 132
Indirect 412
 377
 358
 285
 262
Revolving credit 23
 23
 22
 23
 23
PCI 27
 36
 42
 33
 88
Total loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing $1,052

$1,077

$1,031

$898

$1,111
(1)During 2016, approximately $191 million of nonaccrual energy-related loans were sold.
(2)During 2017 and 2014, approximately $61 million and $121 million, respectively, of nonaccrual residential mortgage loans were sold.
(3)During 2017 and 2014, approximately $331 million and $540 million, respectively, of performing residential mortgage TDRs were sold.
(4)During 2014, approximately $94 million of performing TDRs were transferred from direct lending to residential mortgage.

Asset quality continued to improve in 2017 with declines across almost all loan categories. NPAs declined $186 million driven by commercial and industrial loans and its reduction in the energy-related portfolio. Performing TDRs declined $144 million driven by the sale of $199 million of performing residential mortgage TDRs. Delinquent loans still accruing interest declined $113 million driven by residential mortgage loans, which reflects lowergeneral improvements in credit quality within that portfolio.


Table 17
Asset Quality Ratios
  
 As Of / For The Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Asset Quality Ratios:         
Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI0.73% 0.75% 0.76% 0.75% 0.96%
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI0.38
 0.44
 0.50
 0.79
 1.06
NPLs as a percentage of loans and leases HFI0.40
 0.51
 0.42
 0.51
 0.81
NPAs as a percentage of:         
Total assets0.28
 0.37
 0.34
 0.42
 0.64
Loans and leases HFI plus foreclosed property0.44
 0.57
 0.52
 0.65
 1.01
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases HFI0.38
 0.38
 0.35
 0.46
 0.69
ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases HFI1.04
 1.04
 1.07
 1.23
 1.49
Ratio of ALLL to:         
Net charge-offs2.78 x 2.80 x 3.36 x 2.74 x 2.19 x
NPLs2.62
 2.03
 2.53
 2.39
 1.85
          
Asset Quality Ratios (Excluding Government Guaranteed and PCI): (1) 
  
      
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI0.05% 0.07% 0.06% 0.09% 0.11%
(1)These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of government guaranteed and PCI assets. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios.

The following table provides a summary of performing TDR balances across most loan portfolios.

52
activity: 
TableofContents

The following table provides a summary of performing TDR activity:
             
Table 21
Rollforward of Performing TDRs
 
       Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 
             
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at beginning of year$ 1,050  $ 1,705  
  Inflows  448    594  
  Payments and payoffs  (224)   (222) 
  Charge-offs  (44)   (78) 
  Transfers to nonperforming TDRs, net  (85)   (73) 
  Removal due to the passage of time  (31)   (108) 
  Non-concessionary re-modifications  (2)   (25) 
  Sold and transferred to held for sale  (130)   (745) 
  Other  ―      2  
 Balance at end of year$ 982  $ 1,050  

Table 18
Rollforward of Performing TDRs
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year $1,187
 $982
Inflows 635
 699
Payments and payoffs (253) (217)
Charge-offs (55) (41)
Transfers to nonperforming TDRs, net (78) (68)
Removal due to the passage of time (46) (54)
Non-concessionary re-modifications (3) 
Sold and transferred to LHFS (344) (114)
Balance at end of year $1,043
 $1,187
Payments and payoffs represent cash received from borrowers in connection withinclude scheduled principal payments, prepayments and payoffs of amounts outstanding. Transfers to nonperforming TDRs represent loans that no longer meet the requirements necessary to reflect the loan in accruing status and as a result are subsequently classified as a nonperforming TDR.

status.

TDRs may be removed due to the passage of time if they: (1) did not include a forgiveness of principal or interest, (2) have performed in accordance with the modified terms (generally a minimum of six months), (3) were reported as a TDR over a year end reporting period, and (4) reflected an interest rate on the modified loan that was no less than a market rate at the date of modification. These loans were previously considered TDRs as a result of structural concessions such as extended interest-only terms or an amortization period that did not otherwise conform to normal underwriting guidelines.

In addition, certain loans may be removed from classification as a TDR as a result of a subsequent non-concessionary re-modification. Non-concessionary re-modifications represent TDRs that did not contain concessionary terms at the date of a subsequent renewal/modification and there was a reasonable expectation that the borrower would continue to comply with the terms of the loan subsequent to the date of the re-modification. A re-modification may be considered for such a re-classification if the loan has not had a forgiveness of principal or interest and the modified terms qualify as more than minor such that the re-modified loan is considered a new loan. Alternatively, such loans may be considered for reclassification in years subsequent to the date of the re-modification based on the passage of time as described in the preceding paragraph.


In connection with consumer loan TDRs, a NPL will be returned to accruing status when current as to principal and interest and upon a sustained historical repayment performance (generally a minimum of six months). The following table provides further details regarding the payment status of TDRs:

53
TableofContents

Table 22
TDRs
                        
     December 31, 2015
          Past Due Past Due   
    Current Status 30-89 Days 90 Days Or More Total
                        
    (Dollars in millions)
Performing TDRs (1):                    
 Commercial:                    
  Commercial and industrial$ 45   91.8 % $ 4   8.2 % $ ―     ―   % $ 49 
  CRE - income producing properties  13   100.0     ―     ―       ―     ―       13 
  CRE - construction and development  16   100.0     ―     ―       ―     ―       16 
 Direct retail lending  70   97.2     2   2.8     ―     ―       72 
 Sales finance  16   94.1     1   5.9     ―     ―       17 
 Revolving credit  28   84.9     4   12.1     1   3.0     33 
 Residential mortgage - nonguaranteed  236   81.9     44   15.3     8   2.8     288 
 Residential mortgage - government guaranteed  174   55.1     64   20.2     78   24.7     316 
 Other lending subsidiaries  146   82.0     32   18.0     ―     ―       178 
  Total performing TDRs  744   75.8     151   15.4     87   8.8     982 
Nonperforming TDRs (2)  61   41.8     23   15.7     62   42.5     146 
  Total TDRs$ 805   71.4   $ 174   15.4   $ 149   13.2   $ 1,128 
                        
Table 19
Payment Status of TDRs
   
  December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions) Current Past Due 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days Or More Total
Performing TDRs (1):          
    
Commercial:              
Commercial and industrial $50
 100.0% $
 % $
 % $50
CRE 16
 100.0
 
 
 
 
 16
Retail: 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Residential mortgage 315
 52.1
 111
 18.3
 179
 29.6
 605
Direct 58
 93.5
 4
 6.5
 
 
 62
Indirect 229
 81.5
 52
 18.5
 
 
 281
Revolving credit 24
 82.8
 4
 13.8
 1
 3.4
 29
Total performing TDRs 692
 66.3
 171
 16.4
 180
 17.3
 1,043
Nonperforming TDRs (2) 88
 46.6
 29
 15.3
 72
 38.1
 189
Total TDRs $780
 63.3
 $200
 16.2
 $252
 20.5
 $1,232
(1)Past due performing TDRs are included in past due disclosures.
(2)Nonperforming TDRs are included in NPL disclosures.

54

ACL

Information related to the ACL is presented in the following table:

Table 23 
Analysis of ACL 
                    
     Year Ended December31,��
     2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 
                    
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Beginning balance$ 1,534  $ 1,821  $ 2,048  $ 2,285  $ 2,755  
 Provision for credit losses (excluding PCI)  430    280    587    1,044    1,119  
 Provision for PCI loans  (2)   (29)   5    13    71  
  Charge-offs:               
   Commercial:               
    Commercial and industrial  (81)   (131)   (248)   (337)   (324) 
    CRE - income producing properties  (20)   (31)   (74)   (150)   (167) 
    CRE - construction and development  (4)   (11)   (58)   (245)   (407) 
   Direct retail lending (1)  (54)   (69)   (148)   (224)   (276) 
   Sales finance  (26)   (23)   (23)   (26)   (32) 
   Revolving credit  (70)   (71)   (85)   (81)   (95) 
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed (1)(2)  (40)   (82)   (79)   (135)   (269) 
   Residential mortgage-government guaranteed  (6)   (2)   (2)   (1)   ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries  (286)   (269)   (255)   (225)   (190) 
   PCI  (1)   (21)   (19)   (34)   (66) 
    Total charge-offs (2)  (588)   (710)   (991)   (1,458)   (1,826) 
                    
  Recoveries:               
   Commercial:               
    Commercial and industrial  37    42    47    17    28  
    CRE - income producing properties  7    14    20    9    10  
    CRE - construction and development  11    19    31    45    33  
   Direct retail lending (1)  29    29    38    36    37  
   Sales finance  9    9    9    10    9  
   Revolving credit  20    19    17    18    19  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed (1)  3    7    3    3    5  
   Other lending subsidiaries  36    33    34    26    25  
    Total recoveries  152    172    199    164    166  
 Net charge-offs (2)  (436)   (538)   (792)   (1,294)   (1,660) 
 Other changes, net  24    ―      (27)   ―      ―    
 Ending balance$ 1,550  $ 1,534  $ 1,821  $ 2,048  $ 2,285  
                    
 ALLL (excluding PCI loans)$ 1,399  $ 1,410  $ 1,618  $ 1,890  $ 2,107  
 Allowance for PCI loans  61    64    114    128    149  
 RUFC  90    60    89    30    29  
  Total ACL$ 1,550  $ 1,534  $ 1,821  $ 2,048  $ 2,285  
                    
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion of loans were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage. Charge-offs and recoveries have been reflected in these line items based upon the date the loans were transferred. 
(2)Includes charge-offs of $11 million related to performing TDR and NPL sales during 2014. Includes charge-offs of $87 million in residential mortgage loans during 2011 in connection with BB&T's NPL disposition strategy. 

Table 20
Analysis of ACL
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Beginning balance $1,599
 $1,550
 $1,534
 $1,821
 $2,048
Provision for credit losses (excluding PCI) 562
 574
 430
 280
 587
Provision for PCI loans (15) (2) (2) (29) 5
Charge-offs:  
  
      
Commercial and industrial (95) (143) (90) (143) (257)
CRE (10) (9) (24) (42) (132)
Lease financing (5) (6) 
 
 
Residential mortgage (1) (47) (40) (46) (84) (81)
Direct (1) (61) (53) (54) (69) (148)
Indirect (402) (366) (303) (280) (269)
Revolving credit (76) (69) (70) (71) (85)
PCI (1) (15) (1) (21) (19)
Total charge-offs (697)
(701)
(588)
(710)
(991)
Recoveries:  
  
  
  
  
Commercial and industrial 36
 44
 38
 45
 49
CRE 16
 19
 18
 33
 51
Lease financing 2
 2
 
 
 1
Residential mortgage (1) 2
 3
 3
 7
 3
Direct (1) 25
 26
 29
 29
 38
Indirect 60
 55
 44
 39
 40
Revolving credit 19
 20
 20
 19
 17
Total recoveries 160

169

152

172

199
Net charge-offs (537) (532) (436) (538) (792)
Other changes, net 
 9
 24
 
 (27)
Ending balance $1,609

$1,599

$1,550

$1,534

$1,821
           
ALLL (excluding PCI loans) $1,462
 $1,445
 $1,399
 $1,410
 $1,618
Allowance for PCI loans 28
 44
 61
 64
 114
RUFC 119
 110
 90
 60
 89
Total ACL $1,609

$1,599

$1,550

$1,534

$1,821
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion of loans were transferred from direct lending to residential mortgage. Charge-offs and recoveries have been reflected in these line items based upon the date the loans were transferred.
The ACL consists of the ALLL, which is presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the RUFC, which is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The ACL totaled $1.6 billion at December 31, 2015,2017, an increase of $16$10 million compared to the prior year.

55

The ALLL amounted to 1.07%1.04% of loans and leases held for investment at December 31, 2015, compared to 1.23% at December 31, 2014. This decline is primarily due to the acquisitions occurring during 2015, which provided $14.2 billion in loans2017 and no related allowance as of the various acquisition dates.2016. The ratio of the ALLL to NPLs held for investment was 2.53x2.62x at December 31, 20152017 compared to 2.39x2.03x at December 31, 2014.

2016.


Net charge-offs totaled $436$537 million for 2015,2017, compared to $538$532 million in 2014.2016. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases HFI were 0.35%0.38% for 2015,2017, flat compared to 0.46% in 2014. Net charge-offs declined in most loan portfolios, including decreases in the commercial and industrial and residential mortgage-nonguaranteed portfolios of 50.6% and 50.7%, respectively. CRE – construction and development had net recoveries of $7 million for the year.

2016.

Refer to Note 4 “Loans"Note 3. Loans and ACL” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”ACL" for additional disclosures.

The following table presents an estimated allocation of the ALLL at the end of each of the last five years. This allocation of the ALLL is calculated on an approximate basis and is not necessarily indicative of future losses or allocations. The entire amount of the allowance is available to absorb losses occurring in any category of loans and leases. During 2013, the balance in the unallocated ALLL was incorporated into the loan portfolio segments.

Table 24
Allocation of ALLL by Category
                                 
    December 31,
    2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
       % Loans    % Loans    % Loans    % Loans    % Loans
       in each    in each    in each    in each    in each
    Amount category Amount category Amount category Amount category Amount category
                                 
    (Dollars in millions)
Balances at end of period applicable to:                        
 Commercial and industrial$ 466   35.8 % $ 422   34.6 % $ 454   33.2 % $ 470   33.4 % $ 433   33.9 %
 CRE - income producing                             
  properties  135   9.9     162   8.9     149   8.8     170   8.6     249   8.2  
 CRE - construction and                             
  development  37   2.7     48   2.3     76   2.1     134   2.5     371   3.6  
 Dealer floor plan  8   0.9     10   0.9     8   0.8     2   0.4     3   0.3  
 Direct retail lending (1)  105   8.2     110   6.8     209   13.7     300   13.8     232   13.5  
 Sales finance  40   7.6     40   7.9     37   7.3     27   6.4     35   6.6  
 Revolving credit  104   1.8     110   2.1     115   2.1     102   2.0     112   2.1  
 Residential mortgage-                             
  nonguaranteed (1)  194   21.8     217   25.1     269   20.3     296   20.3     318   18.7  
 Residential mortgage-                             
  government guaranteed  23   0.6     36   0.8     62   1.0     32   0.9     47   0.5  
 Other lending subsidiaries  287   9.9     255   9.6     239   9.0     277   8.8     197   8.1  
 PCI  61   0.8     64   1.0     114   1.7     128   2.9     149   4.5  
 Unallocated  ―     ―       ―     ―       ―     ―       80   ―       110   ―    
  Total ALLL  1,460   100.0 %   1,474   100.0 %   1,732   100.0 %   2,018   100.0 %   2,256   100.0 %
  RUFC  90       60       89       30       29    
  Total ACL$ 1,550     $ 1,534     $ 1,821     $ 2,048     $ 2,285    
                                 
                                 
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion in loans were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage.


Table 21
Allocation of ALLL by Category
   
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
(Dollars in millions) Amount % Loans in each category Amount % Loans in each category Amount % Loans in each category Amount % Loans in each category Amount % Loans in each category
Balances at end of period applicable to:                    
Commercial and industrial $522
 41.1% $530
 40.3% $488
 39.6% $445
 38.5% $475
 37.0%
CRE 160
 14.8
 145
 13.8
 175
 13.5
 212
 11.8
 227
 11.3
Lease financing 9
 1.3
 7
 1.2
 5
 1.1
 4
 0.9
 7
 1.0
Residential mortgage (1) 209
 20.0
 227
 20.8
 217
 22.4
 253
 25.9
 331
 21.3
Direct (1) 106
 8.3
 103
 8.4
 105
 8.2
 110
 6.8
 209
 13.7
Indirect 348
 12.0
 327
 13.0
 305
 12.6
 276
 13.0
 254
 11.9
Revolving credit 108
 2.0
 106
 1.9
 104
 1.8
 110
 2.1
 115
 2.1
PCI 28
 0.5
 44
 0.6
 61
 0.8
 64
 1.0
 114
 1.7
Total ALLL 1,490
 100.0% 1,489
 100.0% 1,460
 100.0% 1,474
 100.0% 1,732
 100.0%
RUFC 119
  
 110
  
 90
  
 60
  
 89
  
Total ACL $1,609




$1,599




$1,550




$1,534




$1,821
  
(1)During the first quarter of 2014, $8.3 billion in loans were transferred from direct to residential mortgage.
FDIC Loss Share Receivable/Payable and AssetAssets Acquired from the FDIC

In connection with the Colonial acquisition, Branch Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that outlineoutlined the terms and conditions under which the FDIC willwould reimburse Branch Bank for a portion of the losses incurred on certain loans, OREO, investment securities and other assets. The following table presents the carrying amount of assets by loss share agreement:

56

Table 25
Assets Acquired from the FDIC by Loss Share Agreement
 
     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
      Commercial  Single Family  Total  Commercial  Single Family  Total 
                       
      (Dollars in millions)  (Dollars in millions) 
 Loans and leases $ 273  $ 539  $ 812  $ 561  $ 654  $ 1,215  
 AFS securities   1,064    ―      1,064    1,243    ―      1,243  
 Other assets   32    27    59    58    38    96  
  Total assets acquired from the FDIC $ 1,369  $ 566  $ 1,935  $ 1,862  $ 692  $ 2,554  
 UPB of loans and leases $ 462  $ 725  $ 1,187  $ 836  $ 888  $ 1,724  

As of October 1, 2014, the loss sharing provisions of the commercial loss sharingDuring 2016, Branch Bank entered into an early termination agreement expired; however, gains on the disposition of assets subject to this agreement will be shared with the FDIC through September 30, 2017. Any gains realized after September 30, 2017 would not be shared withthat terminated the FDIC. Assets subjectloss share agreements. Branch Bank made a payment of approximately $230 million to the single family loss sharing agreement are indemnified through August 31, 2019.

The gain/loss sharing coverage related toFDIC as consideration for the acquired AFS securities is based on a contractually-specified value of the securities as of the dateearly termination of the loss sharing agreement, adjusted to reflect subsequent pay-downs, redemptions or maturities on the underlying securities.share agreements. The contractually-specified value of these securities totaled approximately $492 million at December 31, 2015. During the period of gain sharing (October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2017), any decline in the fair value of the acquired AFS securities down to the contractually-specified value would reduce BB&T’s liability to the FDIC at the applicable loss sharing percentage. BB&T is not indemnified for declines in the fair value of the acquired securities below the contractually-specified amount.

The terms of the loss sharing agreement with respect to certain non-agency MBS provided that Branch Bank would be reimbursed by the FDIC for 95% of any and all losses incurred through the third quarter of 2014. For other assets acquired from the FDIC, the FDIC reimbursement was as follows:

·80% of net losses incurred up to $5 billion
·95% of net losses in excess of $5 billion.

BB&T does not expect cumulative net losses to exceed $5 billion on the respective assets acquired from FDIC. Gains and recoveries on assets acquired from FDIC, net of related expenses, will offset losses or be paid to the FDIC at the applicable loss share percentage at the time of recovery.

Following the conclusion of the 10 year loss share period in 2019, should actual aggregate losses, excluding securities, be less than an amount determined in accordance with these agreements, BB&T will pay the FDIC a portion of the difference. As of December 31, 2015, BB&T projects that in 2019 Branch Bank would owe the FDIC approximately $170 million under the aggregate loss calculation. As described below, this liability is expensed over time and BB&T has recognized total expense of approximately $149 million through December 31, 2015.

The fair value of the net reimbursement the Company expected to receive from the FDIC under these agreements was recorded as the FDIC loss share receivable at the date of acquisition. The fair value ofearly termination eliminated the FDIC loss share receivable/payable was estimated usingassociated with the indemnification by the FDIC. As a discounted cash flow methodology.

Acquired loans were aggregated into separate pools based upon common risk characteristics. Each pool is considered a unit of account and the cash flows expected to be collected, credit losses and other relevant information are developed for each pool. A summaryresult of the accounting treatment related to changes in credit losses on each loan pool and the related FDICsettlement, no future loss share asset follows.

·If the estimated credit loss on a loan pool is increased:

oThe reduction in the net present value of the loan pool is recognized immediately as provision expense and an increase to the ALLL.
oThe FDIC loss share asset is increased by 80% of the adjustment to the ALLL through income, if applicable.

57
·If the estimated credit loss on a loan pool is reduced:

oIf the loan pool has an allowance, the allowance is first reduced to $0 (and, if applicable, 80% of this reduction decreases the FDIC loss share asset) through income.
oIf the loan pool does not have an allowance (or it is first reduced to $0 and there remains additional expected cash flows), the excess of expected cash flows is recognized as a yield adjustment over the remaining expected life of the loan.
oThe decrease in expected reimbursement from the FDIC is recognized in income prospectively using a level yield methodology over the remaining life of the loss share agreements.
oThe increase in the amount expected to be paid to the FDIC as a result of the aggregate loss calculation is recognized prospectively in proportion to expected loan income over the remaining life of the loss share agreements.

The accounting treatment for securities acquired from the FDIC is summarized below:

·Prior to the recognition of OTTI on a security acquired from the FDIC:

oThe purchase discount established at acquisition is accreted into income over the expected life of the underlying securities using a level yield methodology.
oChanges to the expected life of the securities are recognized with a cumulative adjustment to the accretion recognized.

·Subsequent to recognition of OTTI, which is determined using the same methodology that is applied to securities that were not acquired from the FDIC, an increase in expected cash flows is recognized as a yield adjustment over the remaining expected life of the security based on an evaluation of the nature of the increase.

·The income statement effect of the above items is offset by the applicable loss share percentage in FDIC loss share income, net, which cumulatively resulted in a liability of $265 million as of December 31, 2015. Subsequent to September 30, 2014, with the expiration of commercial loss sharing, any OTTI will not be offset.

·Securities acquired from the FDIC are classified as AFS and carried at fair market value. The changes in unrealized gains/losses (down to the contractually specified amount) are offset by the applicable loss share percentage in AOCI, which resulted in a liability of $271 million as of December 31, 2015.

·BB&T would only owe these amounts to the FDIC if BB&T were to sell these securities prior to the end of the third quarter of 2017. BB&T has no current intent to dispose of the securities.

The following table provides informationsharing or gain sharing will occur related to the components of the FDIC loss share receivable (payable):

Table 26
FDIC Loss Share Receivable (Payable)
                
    December 31, 
    2015 2014 
    Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value 
                
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Loans$ 285  $ 11  $ 534  $ 123  
 Securities  (536)   (518)   (565)   (535) 
 Aggregate loss calculation  (149)   (158)   (132)   (161) 
  Total$ (400) $ (665) $ (163) $ (573) 

The decrease in the carrying amount attributable to loans acquired from the FDIC was due to the receipt of cash from the FDIC, negative accretion due to credit loss improvement and the offset to the provision for loans acquired from the FDIC, which was a benefit for the current year. The change in the carrying amount attributable to the aggregate loss calculation is primarily due to accretion of the expected payment. The fair values are based upon a discounted cash flow methodology that is consistent with the acquisition date methodology. The fair value attributable to acquired loans and the aggregate loss calculation changes over time due to the receipt of cash from the FDIC, updated credit loss assumptions and the passage of time. The fair value attributable to securities acquired from the FDIC is based upon the timing and amount that would be payable to the FDIC should they settle at the current fair value at the conclusion of the gain sharing period.

58
Colonial acquisition.

Funding Activities

Deposits are the primary source of funds for lending and investing activities. Scheduled payments, as well as prepayments, and maturities from portfolios of loans and investment securities also provide a stable source of funds. FHLB advances, other secured borrowings, Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt issued through the capital markets, all provide supplemental liquidity sources. Funding activities are monitored and governed through BB&T’s overall asset/liability management process, which is further discussed in the “Market"Market Risk Management”Management" section in “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” herein.Operations." The following section provides a brief description of the various sources of funds.

Deposits

Deposits are attracted principally from clients within BB&T’s branch network through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments to individuals and businesses, including noninterest-bearing checking accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market deposit accounts, CDs and IRAs. Deposit account terms vary with respect to the minimum balance required, the time period the funds must remain on deposit and service charge schedules. Interest rates paid on specific deposit types are determined based on (i) the interest rates offered by competitors, (ii) the anticipated amount and timing of funding needs, (iii) the availability and cost of alternative sources of funding, and (iv) anticipated future economic conditions and interest rates. Deposits are attractive sources of funding because of their stability and relative cost. Deposits are regarded as an important part of the overall client relationship and provide opportunities to cross-sell other BB&T services.

Total deposits were $149.1$157.4 billion at December 31, 2015, an increase2017, a decrease of $20.1$2.9 billion compared to year-end 2014. This increase was driven by acquisition activity and organic growth.2016. Noninterest-bearing deposits totaled $45.7$53.8 billion at December 31, 2015,2017, an increase of $6.9$3.1 billion from December 31, 2014.2016. The majority of the increase in noninterest-bearing deposits was dueattributable to businesspersonal and personalbusiness deposits, which grew $4.1$1.7 billion (16.1%(12.7%) and $2.7$1.4 billion (29.0%(4.1%), respectively.

Interest checking increased $5.1decreased $2.6 billion and money market and savings increased $9.9decreased $2.1 billion during 2015,2017 driven by business deposits, while time deposits and IRAs decreased $1.8$1.2 billion during 2015.

2017 primarily in personal accounts.


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, total deposits averaged $138.5$159.2 billion, an increase of $9.4$1.8 billion compared to 2014.2016, primarily due to the National Penn acquisition in 2016. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.24%0.32% for 2015,2017, compared to 0.26%0.23% for 2014.

2016.

The following table presents the composition of average deposits for the last five quarters:

 Table 27 
 Composition of Average Deposits 
                  
   For the Three Months Ended 
   12/31/15 9/30/15 6/30/15 3/31/15 12/31/14 
                  
   (Dollars in millions) 
 Noninterest-bearing deposits$ 45,824  $ 44,153  $ 41,502  $ 39,701  $ 39,130  
 Interest checking  24,157    22,593    20,950    20,623    19,308  
 Money market and savings  61,431    59,306    53,852    51,644    51,176  
 Time deposits  16,981    16,837    14,800    17,000    20,041  
 Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing  98    948    764    563    660  
  Total average deposits$ 148,491  $ 143,837  $ 131,868  $ 129,531  $ 130,315  

Table 22
Quarterly Composition of Average Deposits
   
  For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions) 12/31/2017 9/30/2017 6/30/2017 3/31/2017 12/31/2016
Noninterest-bearing deposits $54,288
 $53,489
 $52,573
 $51,095
 $51,421
Interest checking 26,746
 27,000
 28,849
 29,578
 28,634
Money market and savings 61,693
 61,450
 64,294
 64,857
 63,884
Time deposits 13,744
 13,794
 14,088
 14,924
 15,693
Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing 1,488
 1,681
 459
 929
 486
Total average deposits $157,959

$157,414

$160,263

$161,383

$160,118
Average deposits for the fourth quarter of 2017 were $148.5$158.0 billion, an increase of $4.7 billionup $545 million compared to the prior quarter.

Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1.7 billion, with approximately $870$799 million, of the increaseprimarily due to acquisitions. increases in commercial, public funds and personal balances.

Interest checking grew $1.6 billion (approximately $220decreased $254 million, excluding acquisitions)primarily due to decreases in public funds, personal and moneycommercial balances.

Money market and savings grew $2.1 billion (approximately $535increased $243 million excluding acquisitions). Excluding acquisition activity,primarily due to commercial balances partially offset by decreased personal and public funds balances.

Average time deposits declined approximately $650decreased $50 million or an annualized 18.5%.

The growthas decreases in noninterest-bearingpersonal balances and IRAs were partially offset by higher commercial balances.


Average foreign office deposits and lower-cost deposits drove continued improvement in mix during the quarter. decreased $193 million due to lower overall funding needs.

Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 30.9%34.4% of total average deposits for the fourth quarter, compared to 30.7%34.0% for the prior quarter and 30.0%32.1% a year ago.

59

The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.24%0.40% for the fourth quarter, flatup five basis points compared to the prior quarter.

The following table provides information regarding the scheduled maturities of time deposits that are $100,000 and greater at December 31, 2015.

Table 28
Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits $100,000 and Greater
December 31, 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Three months or less$ 2,682 
Over three through six months 1,170 
Over six through twelve months 1,734 
Over twelve months 1,976 
Total$ 7,562 

Short-term

Table 23
Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits $100,000 and Greater
  
(Dollars in millions)December 31, 2017
Three months or less$1,647
Over three through six months865
Over six through twelve months1,289
Over twelve months1,525
Total$5,326

Short-Term Borrowings

BB&T also uses various types of short-term borrowings to meet funding needs. While deposits remain the primary source for funding loan originations, management uses short-term borrowings as a supplementary funding source for loan growth and other balance sheet management purposes. Short-term borrowings were 1.6%2.0% of total funding on average in 20152017 as compared to 1.8%1.2% in 2014.2016. The types of short-term borrowings that have been, or may be, used by the Company include Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, master notes, commercial paper, short-term bank notes and short-term FHLB advances. Short-term borrowings at the end of 20152017 were $3.6$4.9 billion, a decrease of $124 million, or 3.3%, compared to $1.4 billion at year-end 2014.2016. Average short-term borrowings totaled $3.2$4.3 billion during 20152017 compared to $3.4$2.6 billion last year. The decreaseincrease in the average balance of short-term borrowings during 20152017 primarily reflects an increasea decrease in deposits as a funding source.


The following table summarizes certain information for the past three years with respect to short-term borrowings:

Table 29
Short-Term Borrowings
                   
       As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 2013 
                   
       (Dollars in millions)  
 Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase:            
  Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year$ 1,327   $ 1,073   $ 1,537   
  Balance outstanding at end of year  617     317     463   
  Average outstanding during the year  901     526     662   
  Average interest rate during the year  0.23 %   0.20 %   0.25 % 
  Average interest rate at end of year  0.70     0.18     0.28   
                   
 Federal Funds Purchased and Short-Term Borrowed Funds:            
  Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year$ 4,041   $ 4,405   $ 4,722   
  Balance outstanding at end of year  2,976     3,400     3,675   
  Average outstanding during the year  2,320     2,895     3,797   
  Average interest rate during the year  0.11 %   0.12 %   0.13 % 
  Average interest rate at end of year  0.32     0.08     0.09   

Long-term

Table 24
Short-Term Borrowings
   
  As Of / For The Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase:      
Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year $1,923
 $2,265
 $1,327
Balance outstanding at end of year 483
 970
 617
Average outstanding during the year 1,449
 1,600
 901
Average interest rate during the year 0.70% 0.37% 0.23%
Average interest rate at end of year 0.43
 0.52
 0.70
       
Federal Funds Purchased and Short-Term Borrowed Funds:  
  
  
Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year $6,859
 $3,003
 $4,041
Balance outstanding at end of year 4,455
 436
 2,976
Average outstanding during the year 2,862
 954
 2,320
Average interest rate during the year 1.06% 0.30% 0.11%
Average interest rate at end of year 1.34
 0.71
 0.32
Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt provides funding and, to a lesser extent, regulatory capital. During 2015, long-term debt represented 11.8% of average total funding compared to 12.0% during 2014. At December 31, 2015,2017, long-term debt totaled $23.8$23.6 billion, an increase of $457 million$1.7 billion compared to year-end 2014.2016. The increase in long-term debt reflects the issuancenew senior debt issuances of $1.0$7.3 billion of BB&T Corporation senior notes and $1.2$1.5 billion of Branch Bank subordinated notes, as well as debt assumed through acquisitions,in new FHLB advances, partially offset by the early extinguishment of $931 million$2.9 billion of higher-cost FHLB debtadvances and other payments and maturities.repayments totaling $4.2 billion of long-term debt. The average cost of long-term debt was 2.13%2.10% in 2015,2017, down 3 basis points compared to 2.36% in 2014.2016. See Note 9 “Long-Term Debt” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” herein"Note 8. Long-Term Debt" for further disclosure.

60
additional disclosures.

Exclusive of hedge basis adjustments,

FHLB advances represented 24.0%10.5% of total outstanding long-term debt at December 31, 2015,2017, compared to 28.5%18.7% at December 31, 2014. FHLB advances are2016. The remainder of long-term funding sources that provide flexibility to structure the debt in a manner that aids in the managementis primarily issuances of interest rate risksenior and liquidity.

subordinated notes by BB&T and Branch Bank.


Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity totaled $27.3$29.7 billion at December 31, 2015, an increase2017, a decrease of $3.0 billion,$231 million, or 12.2%0.8%, from year-end 2014.2016. Book value per common share at December 31, 20152017 was $31.66,$34.01, compared to $30.09$33.14 at December 31, 2014.

Shareholders’2016.

The change in shareholders' equity increased due to net income in excess of dividends declared of $1.2 billion, as well as $2.2reflects $1.6 billion of shares issued in connection with acquisitions. Additionally, there were $88 million of issuances of sharesshare repurchases and other transactions in connection with equity-based compensation plans, the 401(k) plancommon and the dividend reinvestment plan.

These increases werepreferred dividends totaling $1.2 billion, partially offset by a $222 million reduction to equity in connection with the AmRisc transaction. Additionally, the net loss in AOCI increased $277 million, primarily due to a $186 million after-tax net decrease in the valueincome of the AFS securities portfolio and a $97 million after-tax pension impact.

$2.4 billion.

Tangible book value per common share, which is a non-GAAP measure, at December 31, 20152017 was $19.82$20.80 compared to $19.86$20.18 at December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, measures of tangible capital were not required by the regulators and, therefore, were considered non-GAAP measures.2016. Refer to the section titled “Capital” herein"Capital" for a discussion of how BB&T calculates and uses these measures in the evaluation of the Company.

Risk Management

BB&T has a strong and consistent risk culture, based on established risk values, which promotes predictable and consistent performance within an environment of open communication and effective challenge. The strong culture influences all associates in the organization daily and helps them evaluate whether risks are acceptable or unacceptable while making decisions that balance quality, profitability and growth appropriately. BB&T’s effective risk management framework establishes an environment which enables it to achieve superior performance relative to peers, ensures that BB&T is viewed among the safest of banks and assures the operational freedom to act on opportunities.

BB&T ensures that there is an appropriate return for the amount of risk taken, and that the expected return is in line with its strategic objectives and business plan. Risk-taking activities are evaluated and prioritized to identify those that present attractive risk-adjusted returns while preserving asset value. BB&T only undertakes risks that are understood and can be managed effectively. By managing risk well, BB&T ensures sufficient capital is available to maintain and grow core business operations in a safe and sound manner.


Regardless of financial gain or loss to the Company, associates are held accountable if they do not follow the established risk management policies and procedures. Compensation decisions take into account an associate’s adherence to, and successful implementation of, BB&T’s risk values. The compensation structure supports the Company’s core values and sound risk management practices in an effort to promote judicious risk-taking behavior.

BB&T’s risk culture encourages transparency and open dialogue between all levels in the performance of organizational functions, such as the development, marketing and implementation of a product or service.

BB&T has established a risk management framework based on a “three"three lines of defense”defense" model:

First Line of Defense: Risk management begins with the BUs, the point at which risk is originated and where risks must be managed. Business unit managers in the first line identify, assess, control and report their group’s risk profile compared to its approved risk limits.

Second Line of Defense: The RMO provides independent oversight and guidance of risk-taking across the enterprise. The RMO aggregates, integrates, and correlates risk information into a holistic picture of the corporation’s risk profile and concentrations. The RMO establishes policies and limits and reports sources and amounts of risk to Executive Management and the Board of Directors.

Third Line of Defense: Audit Services (BB&T’s internal audit function) evaluates the design and effectiveness of the risk management framework and its results. Results are reported to Executive Management and the Board of Directors according to Audit Services Policy.

The following chart depicts the three lines of defense model:
·First Line of Defense: Risk management begins with the BUs, the point at which risk is originated and where risks must be managed. Business unit managers in the first line identify, assess, control and report their group’s risk profile compared to its approved risk limits.

·Second Line of Defense: The RMO provides independent oversight and guidance of risk-taking across the enterprise. The RMO aggregates, integrates, and correlates risk information into a holistic picture of the corporation’s risk profile and concentrations. The RMO establishes policies and limits and reports sources and amounts of risk to Executive Management and the Board of Directors.

·Third Line of Defense: Audit Services (BB&T’s internal audit function) evaluates the design and effectiveness of the risk management framework and its results. Results are reported to Executive Management and the Board of Directors according to Audit Services Policy.

61

The following chart depicts the three lines of defense model:
Risk CommitteesBoard of DirectorsExecutive Management
   
1st
1st Line of Defense
2nd
2nd Line of Defense
3rd
3rd Line of Defense
Business UnitsRisk FunctionsAudit Services
   
Chief Risk Officer

The CRO leads the RMO, which designs, organizes and manages BB&T’s risk management framework. The RMO is responsible for ensuring effective risk management oversight, measurement, monitoring, reporting and consistency. The CRO has direct access to the Board of Directors and Executive Management. The CRO is responsible for identifying and communicating in a timely manner to the CEO and the Board of Directors meaningful risks and significant instances when the RMO’s assessment of risk differs from that of a BU, significant instances when a BU is not adhering to the risk governance framework, and BB&T’s risk profile in relation to its risk appetite on at least a quarterly basis. In the event that the CRO and CEO’s assessment of risk were to differ or if the CEO were to not adhere to the risk management framework, the CRO would have the responsibility to report such matters to the Board of Directors.

The Executive Management-led enterprise risk committees provide oversight of the first and second lines of defense and communicate risk appetite and values to the RMO. The CRO and the enterprise risk committees approve policies, set risk limits and tolerances and monitor results.

The RMC, CRMC, ORMC, CROC and the MRLCC are the enterprise risk committees and provide oversight of the risks as described in the common risk language. There is Executive Management members participaterepresentation in all five committees.

The risk management framework is composed of specialized risk functions focused on specific types of risk. The MRLCC, CRMC, CROC and ORMC provide oversight of market, liquidity, capital, credit, compliance, and operational risk while RMC provides a fully integrated view of all material risks across the company. The RMC provides oversight of all risks and its purpose is to review BB&T’s aggregate risk exposure, evaluate risk appetite, and evaluate risks not reviewed by other risk committees.

The RMC is responsible for taking a broad view of risk, incorporating information from all risk functions. This combination of broad and specific focus provides the most effective framework for the management of risk. The RMC is chaired by the CRO and its membership includes all members of Executive Management, the General Auditor (ex officio) and senior leaders from Financial Management, the RMO and other areas.


The principal types of inherent risk include compliance, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation and strategic risks.


Compliance risk

Compliance risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital arising from violations of laws, rules or regulations, or from non-conformance with prescribed practices, internal policies and procedures or ethical standards. This risk exposes BB&T to fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding of contracts. Compliance risk can result in diminished reputation, reduced franchise or enterprise value, limited business opportunities and lessened expansion potential.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital arising from the default, inability or unwillingness of a borrower, obligor, or counterparty to meet the terms of any financial obligation with BB&T or otherwise perform as agreed. Credit risk exists in all activities where success depends on the performance of a borrower, obligor, or counterparty. Credit risk arises when BB&T funds are extended, committed, invested, or otherwise exposed through actual or implied contractual agreements, whether on or off balance sheet. Credit risk also occurs when the credit quality of an issuer whose securities or other instruments the bank holds deteriorates.

62

BB&T has established the following general practices to manage credit risk:

·limiting the amount of credit that individual lenders may extend to a borrower;

·establishing a process for credit approval accountability;

·careful initial underwriting and analysis of borrower, transaction, market and collateral risks;

·ongoing servicing and monitoring of individual loans and lending relationships;

·continuous monitoring of the portfolio, market dynamics and the economy; and

·periodically reevaluating the bank’s strategy and overall exposure as economic, market and other relevant conditions change.

limiting the amount of credit that individual lenders may extend to a borrower;

establishing a process for credit approval accountability;

careful initial underwriting and analysis of borrower, transaction, market and collateral risks;

ongoing servicing and monitoring of individual loans and lending relationships;

continuous monitoring of the portfolio, market dynamics and the economy; and

periodically reevaluating the bank’s strategy and overall exposure as economic, market and other relevant conditions change.

The following discussion presents the principal types of lending conducted by BB&T and describes the underwriting procedures and overall risk management of BB&T’s lending function.

Underwriting Approach

The loan portfolio is a primary source of profitability and risk,risk; therefore, proper loan underwriting is critical to BB&T’s long-term financial success. BB&T’s underwriting approach is designed to define acceptable combinations of specific risk-mitigating features that ensure credit relationships conform to BB&T’s risk philosophy. Provided below is a summary of the most significant underwriting criteria used to evaluate new loans and loan renewals:

·Cash flow and debt service coverage—cash flow adequacy is a necessary condition of creditworthiness, meaning that loans must either be clearly supported by a borrower’s cash flow or, if not, must be justified by secondary repayment sources.

·Secondary sources of repayment—alternative repayment funds are a significant risk-mitigating factor as long as they are liquid, can be easily accessed and provide adequate resources to supplement the primary cash flow source.

·Value of any underlying collateral—loans are generally secured by the asset being financed. Because an analysis of the primary and secondary sources of repayment is the most important factor, collateral, unless it is liquid, does not justify loans that cannot be serviced by the borrower’s normal cash flows.

·Overall creditworthiness of the customer, taking into account the customer’s relationships, both past and current, with BB&T and other lenders—BB&T’s success depends on building lasting and mutually beneficial relationships with clients, which involves assessing their financial position and background.

·Level of equity invested in the transaction—in general, borrowers are required to contribute or invest a portion of their own funds prior to any loan advances.

Cash flow and debt service coverage—cash flow adequacy is a necessary condition of creditworthiness, meaning that loans must either be clearly supported by a borrower’s cash flow or, if not, must be justified by secondary repayment sources.

Secondary sources of repayment—alternative repayment funds are a significant risk-mitigating factor as long as they are liquid, can be easily accessed and provide adequate resources to supplement the primary cash flow source.

Value of any underlying collateral—loans are generally secured by the asset being financed. Because an analysis of the primary and secondary sources of repayment is the most important factor, collateral, unless it is liquid, does not justify loans that cannot be serviced by the borrower’s normal cash flows.

Overall creditworthiness of the customer, taking into account the customer’s relationships, both past and current, with BB&T and other lenders—BB&T’s success depends on building lasting and mutually beneficial relationships with clients, which involves assessing their financial position and background.

Level of equity invested in the transaction—in general, borrowers are required to contribute or invest a portion of their own funds prior to any loan advances.


Commercial Loan and Lease Portfolio

The commercial loan and lease portfolio represents the largest category of the Company’s total loan portfolio. BB&T’s commercial lending program is generally targeted to serve small-to-middle market businesses with sales of $250 million or less. In addition, BB&T’s Corporate Banking Group provides lending solutions to large corporate clients. Traditionally, lending to small and mid-sized businesses has been among BB&T’s strongest market segments.

Commercial The commercial loan and lease portfolio consists of dealer-based financing of equipment for small business loans are primarily originated throughbusinesses, commercial equipment leasing and finance, and full-service commercial mortgage banking. BB&T offers these services to bank clients as well as nonbank clients within and outside BB&T’s Community Bank. primary geographic market area.

In accordance with the Company’s lending policy, each loan undergoes a detailed underwriting process, which incorporates BB&T’s underwriting approach, procedures and evaluations described above. Commercial loans are typically priced with an interest rate tied to market indices, such as the prime rate or LIBOR. Commercial loans are individually monitored and reviewed for any possible deterioration in the ability of the client to repay the loan. Approximately 87.7%86.8% of BB&T’s commercial loans are secured by real estate, business equipment, inventories and other types of collateral.

63

Direct Retail Loan Portfolio

The direct retail loan portfolio primarily consists of a wide variety of loan products offered through BB&T’s branch network. Various types of secured and unsecured loans are marketed to qualifying existing clients and to other creditworthy candidates in BB&T’s market area. The vast majority of direct retail loans are secured by first or second liens on residential real estate and include both closed-end home equity loans and revolving home equity lines of credit. Direct retail loans are subject to the same rigorous lending policies and procedures as described above for commercial loans and are underwritten with note amounts and credit limits that ensure consistency with the Company’s risk philosophy.

Sales Finance Loan Portfolio

The sales finance category primarily includes secured indirect installment loans to consumers for the purchase of new and used automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. Such loans are originated through approved franchised and independent dealers throughout the BB&T market area. These loans are relatively homogenous and no single loan is individually significant in terms of its size and potential risk of loss. Sales finance loans are subject to the same rigorous lending policies and procedures as described above for commercial loans and are underwritten with note amounts and credit limits that ensure consistency with the Company’s risk philosophy. In addition to its normal underwriting due diligence, BB&T uses application systems and “scoring systems” to help underwrite and manage the credit risk in its sales finance portfolio.

Revolving Credit Loan Portfolio

The revolving credit portfolio consists of the outstanding balances on credit cards and BB&T’s checking account overdraft protection product, Constant Credit. BB&T markets credit cards to its existing banking client base and does not solicit cardholders through nationwide programs or other forms of mass marketing. Such balances are generally unsecured and actively managed.

Residential Mortgage Loan Portfolio

Branch Bank offers various types of fixed-fixed and adjustable-rate loans for the purpose of constructing, purchasing or refinancing residential properties. BB&T primarily originates conforming mortgage loans and higher quality jumbo and construction-to-permanent loans for owner-occupied properties. Conforming loans are loans that are underwritten in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth by FNMA and FHLMC. They are generally collateralized by one-to-four-family residential real estate, typically have loan-to-collateral value ratios of 80% or less at origination, and are made to borrowers in good credit standing.

Risks associated with the mortgage lending function include interest rate risk, which is mitigated through the sale of a substantial portion of conforming fixed-rate loans in the secondary mortgage market, and an effective MSR hedging process. Borrower risk is lessened through rigorous underwriting procedures and mortgage insurance. The right to service the loans and receive servicing income is generally retained when conforming loans are sold. Management believes that the retention of mortgage servicing is a relationship driver in retail banking and a part of management’s strategy to establish profitable long-term customer relationships and offer high quality client service. BB&T also purchases residential mortgage loans from correspondent originators. The loans purchased from third-party originators are subject to the same underwriting and risk-management criteria as loans originated internally.

Other Lending Subsidiaries


Direct Loan Portfolio

BB&T’s other lending subsidiaries

The direct loan portfolio primarily consists of loans originateda wide variety of loan products offered through BUs that provide specialty finance alternatives to consumers and businesses including: dealer-based financing of equipment for small businesses and consumers, commercial equipment leasing and finance, insurance premium finance, indirect nonprime automobile finance, and full-service commercial mortgage banking. BB&T offers these services to bank clients as well as nonbank clients within and outside BB&T’s primary geographicbranch network. Various types of secured and unsecured loans are marketed to qualifying existing clients and to other creditworthy candidates in BB&T’s market area.

BB&T’s other lending subsidiaries adhere The vast majority of direct loans are revolving home equity lines of credit secured by first or second liens on residential real estate. Direct loans are subject to the same overall underwriting approachrigorous lending policies and procedures as described above for commercial loans and are underwritten with note amounts and credit limits that ensure consistency with the commercialCompany’s risk philosophy.

Indirect Loan Portfolio
The indirect portfolio primarily includes secured indirect installment loans to consumers for the purchase of new and consumer lendingused automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. The indirect portfolio also includes nonprime automobile finance. Such loans are originated through approved franchised and also utilize automated credit scoring to assist with underwriting credit risk. The majority of theseindependent dealers throughout the BB&T market area. These loans are relatively homogenoushomogeneous and no single loan is individually significant in terms of its size and potential risk of loss. Indirect loans are subject to the same rigorous lending policies and procedures as described above for commercial loans and are underwritten with note amounts and credit limits that ensure consistency with the Company’s risk philosophy. In addition to its normal underwriting due diligence, BB&T uses application systems and "scoring systems" to help underwrite and manage the credit risk in its indirect portfolio.
Revolving Credit Loan Portfolio
The majorityrevolving credit portfolio consists of the loansoutstanding balances on credit cards and BB&T’s checking account overdraft protection product, Constant Credit. BB&T markets credit cards to its existing banking client base and does not solicit cardholders through nationwide programs or other forms of mass marketing. Such balances are secured by real estate, automobiles, equipment or unearned insurance premiums. As of December 31, 2015, the other lending subsidiaries portfolio includes loans to nonprime borrowers of approximately $3.2 billion.

64
generally unsecured and actively managed.


PCI

The PCI balance includes $539 million of loans that are covered by loss sharing agreements and $273 million ofacquired with credit deterioration subsequent to origination as well as loans that were formerly covered by loss sharing agreements. Refer to Note 4 “Loans"Note 3. Loans and ACL” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” and to “Acquired from FDIC and FDIC Loss Share Receivable/Payable”section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this reportACL" for additional disclosures related to loans acquired from the FDIC.

information.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital that BB&T will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding (funding liquidity risk), or that it cannot easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering market prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions (market liquidity risk).

Market risk

Market risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital arising from changes in the market value of portfolios, securities, or other financial instruments. Market risk results from changes in the level, volatility or correlations among financial market rates or prices, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices or other relevant rates or prices.

Interest rate risk results from differences between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows (re-pricing risk); from changing rate relationships among different yield curves affecting bank activities (basis risk); from changing rate relationships across the spectrum of maturities (yield curve risk); and from interest-related options embedded in bank products (options risk).

For additional information concerning BB&T’s management of market risk, see the “Market"Market Risk Management”Management" section of “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” herein.

Operations."

Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. This definition includes legal risk, which is the risk of loss arising from defective transactions, litigation or claims made, or the failure to adequately protect company-owned assets.

Cybersecurity

In recent years, cybersecurity has gained prominence within the financial services industry due to increases in the quantity and sophistication of cyber attacks, which include significant distributed denial-of-service and credential validation attacks, malicious code and viruses and attempts to breach the security of systems, which, in certain instances, have resulted in unauthorized access to customer account data.

BB&T has a number of complex information systems used for a variety of functions by customers, employees and vendors. In addition, third parties with which BB&T does business or that facilitate business activities (e.g., vendors, exchanges, clearing houses, central depositories and financial intermediaries) could also be sources of cybersecurity risk to BB&T, including with respect to breakdowns or failures of their systems, misconduct by the employees of such parties, or cyber attacks which could affect their ability to deliver a product or service to BB&T.

As a FHC, BB&T must adhere to the security requirements and expectations of the applicable regulatory agencies, which include requirements related to data privacy, systems availability and business continuity planning, among others. The regulatory agencies have established guidelines for the responsibilities of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and senior management, which include establishing policy, appointing and training personnel, implementing review and testing functions and ensuring an appropriate frequency of updates.

65

The primary responsibility for cybersecurity at BB&T lies with the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors which has delegatedis responsible for the day-to-day operations to management via the RMC, ORMCof cybersecurity risk. The DTSSRC and EITSC. The EITSC serves as the primary teamits subcommittees are responsible for cybersecurity strategy, and monitoring and reporting on cybersecurity risks. The EITSC, whichCorporate Information Security is led by the Chief Information Officer, provides a bi-monthly reportresponsible for day-to-day cybersecurity operations. Various reports on cybersecurity are provided to executive managementExecutive Management and provides other periodic cybersecurity reporting to the RMC and the ORMC. In addition, the Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer provide a quarterly Cyber Security Updateupdate is provided to the Risk Committee or the full Board of Directors on a rotating basis. Annually, the EITSC provides a formal IT risk assessment andAdditionally, Corporate Information Security reportsprovides an Information Security Annual Report, which includes cybersecurity risk assessments, to the Risk Committee.

Board of Directors.

As a complement to the overall cybersecurity infrastructure, BB&T utilizes a number of internal training methods, both formally through mandatory courses and informally through written communications and other updates. Internal policies and procedures have been implemented to encourage the reporting of potential phishing attacks or other security risks. BB&T also uses third party services as part of its cybersecurity framework, and any such third parties are required to comply with BB&T’s policies regarding information security and confidentiality. BB&T also uses third party groups to assess and supplement the Company’s cybersecurity needs.


These cyber attacks have not, to date, resulted in any material disruption to BB&T’s operations or harm to its customers and have not had a material adverse effect on BB&T’s results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that a sophisticated cyber attack can be detected or thwarted.


Model Risk Management
Model risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or capital from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs. BB&T uses models for many purposes, including the valuation of financial positions and the measurement of risk. Valuation models are used to value certain financial instruments for which quoted prices may not be readily available. Valuation models are also used as inputs for VaR, regulatory capital, stress testing and the ACL. Models are owned by the applicable BUs, who are responsible for the development, implementation and use of their models. Oversight of these functions is performed by the MRM, which is a component of the RMO. Once models have been approved, model owners are responsible for the maintenance of an appropriate operating environment and must monitor and evaluate the performance of the models on a recurring basis. Models are updated in response to changes in portfolio composition, industry and economic conditions, technological capabilities and other developments.

The MRM utilizes internal validation analysts and managers with skill sets in predictive modeling to perform detailed reviews of model development, implementation and conceptual soundness. On certain occasions, the MRM will also engage external parties to assist with validation efforts. The MRM maintains documented quality assurance procedures that are used to confirm that validation analysts have completed the necessary field work in an auditable and complete fashion. The MRM tracks issues that have been identified by validation analysts and engages with model owners to ensure their timely remediation. MRM presents model limitations and risks to management and the Board of Directors via model validation reports and regular meetings with the ORMC.

Reputation risk

Reputation risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings, capital, enterprise value, the BB&T brand, and public confidence arising from negative publicity or public opinion, whether real or perceived, regarding BB&T’s business practices, products, services, transactions, or other activities undertaken by BB&T, its representatives, or its partners. A negative reputation may impair BB&T’s relationship with clients, associates, communities or shareholders, and it is often a residual risk that arises when other risks are not managed properly.

Strategic risk

Strategic risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings, capital, enterprise value and the achievement of BB&T’s vision, mission, purpose and business objectives consistent with its values that arises from BB&T’s business strategy or potentially adverse business decisions, improper or ineffective implementation of business decisions or lack of responsiveness to changes in the banking industry and operating environment. Strategic risk is a function of BB&T’s strategic goals, business strategies, resources and quality of implementation. The responsibility for managing this risk rests with the Board of Directors, Executive Management and the Senior Leadership Team.

Market Risk Management

The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving BB&T’s strategic financial objectives. As a financial institution, BB&T’s most significant market risk exposure is interest rate risk in its balance sheet; however, market risk also includes product liquidity risk, price risk and volatility risk in BB&T’s LOBs.BUs. The primary objectives of market risk management are to minimize any adverse effect that changes in market risk factors may have on net interest income, net income and capital and to offset the risk of price changes for certain assets recorded at fair value. At BB&T, market risk management also includes the enterprise-wide IPV function.

Interest Rate Market Risk (Other than Trading)

BB&T actively manages market risk associated with asset and liability portfolios with a focus on the strategic pricing of asset and liability accounts and management of appropriate maturity mixes of assets and liabilities. The goal of these activities is the development of appropriate maturity and repricing opportunities in BB&T’s portfolios of assets and liabilities that will produce reasonably consistent net interest income during periods of changing interest rates. These portfolios are analyzed for proper fixed-rate and variable-rate mixes under various interest rate scenarios.

66


The asset/liability management process is designed to achieve relatively stable NIM and assure liquidity by coordinating the volumes, maturities or repricing opportunities of earning assets, deposits and borrowed funds. Among other things, this process gives consideration to prepayment trends related to securities, loans and leases and certain deposits that have no stated maturity. Prepayment assumptions are developed using a combination of market data and internal historical prepayment experience for residential mortgage-related loans and securities, and internal historical prepayment experience for client deposits with no stated maturity and loans that are not residential mortgage related. These assumptions are subject to monthly back-testing,review and adjustment, and are adjustedmodified as deemed necessary to reflect changes in interest rates relative to the reference rate of the underlying assets or liabilities. On a monthly basis, BB&T evaluates the accuracy of its Simulation model, which includes an evaluation of its prepayment assumptions, to ensure that all significant assumptions inherent in the model appropriately reflect changes in the interest rate environment and related trends in prepayment activity. It is the responsibility of the MRLCC to determine and achieve the most appropriate volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as to ensure an adequate level of liquidity and capital, within the context of corporate performance goals. The MRLCC also sets policy guidelines and establishes long-term strategies with respect to interest rate risk exposure and liquidity. The MRLCC meets regularly to review BB&T’s interest rate risk and liquidity positions in relation to present and prospective market and business conditions, and adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to ensure that the potential impacts on earnings and liquidity as a result of fluctuations in interest rates are within acceptable tolerance guidelines.

BB&T uses derivatives primarily to manage economic risk related to securities, commercial loans, MSRs and mortgage banking operations, long-term debt and other funding sources. BB&T also uses derivatives to facilitate transactions on behalf of its clients. As of December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T had derivative financial instruments outstanding with notional amounts totaling $67.5$75.2 billion, with a net fair value loss of a gain of $178$271 million. See Note 18 “Derivative"Note 17. Derivative Financial Instruments” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” hereinInstruments" for additional disclosures.

The majority of BB&T’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and, therefore, differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. Fluctuations in interest rates and actions of the FRB to regulate the availability and cost of credit have a greater effect on a financial institution’s profitability than do the effects of higher costs for goods and services. Through its balance sheet management function, which is monitored by the MRLCC, management believes that BB&T is positioned to respond to changing needs for liquidity, changes in interest rates and inflationary trends.

Management uses the Simulation to measure the sensitivity of projected earnings to changes in interest rates. The Simulation projects net interest income and interest rate risk for a rolling two-year period of time. The Simulation takes into account the current contractual agreements that BB&T has made with its customers on deposits, borrowings, loans, investments and commitments to enter into those transactions. Furthermore, the Simulation considers the impact of expected customer behavior. Management monitors BB&T’s interest sensitivity by means of a model that incorporates the current volumes, average rates earned and paid, and scheduled maturities and payments of asset and liability portfolios, together with multiple scenarios that include projected prepayments, repricing opportunities and anticipated volume growth. Using this information, the model projects earnings based on projected portfolio balances under multiple interest rate scenarios. This level of detail is needed to simulate the effect that changes in interest rates and portfolio balances may have on the earnings of BB&T. This method is subject to the accuracy of the assumptions that underlie the process, but management believes that it provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates than other analyses such as static or dynamic gap. In addition to the Simulation, BB&T uses EVE analysis to focus on projected changes in capitalassets and liabilities given potential changes in interest rates. This measure also allows BB&T to analyze interest rate risk that falls outside the analysis window contained in the Simulation. The EVE model is a discounted cash flow of the portfolio of assets, liabilities, and derivative instruments. The difference in the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities is defined as the economic value of equity.

The asset/liability management process requires a number of key assumptions. Management determines the most likely outlook for the economy and interest rates by analyzing external factors, including published economic projections and data, the effects of likely monetary and fiscal policies, as well as any enacted or prospective regulatory changes. BB&T’s current and prospective liquidity position, current balance sheet volumes and projected growth, accessibility of funds for short-term needs and capital maintenance are also considered. This data is combined with various interest rate scenarios to provide management with the information necessary to analyze interest sensitivity and to aid in the development of strategies to reach performance goals.

67

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on net interest income as projected for the next twelve months assuming a gradual change in interest rates as described below. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing, deposit sensitivity, customer preferences and capital plans. The resulting change in net interest income reflects the level of interest rate sensitivity that income has in relation to the investment, loan and deposit portfolios.

Table 30
Interest Sensitivity Simulation Analysis
                     
    Interest Rate Scenario Annualized Hypothetical Percentage 
    Linear Prime Rate  Change in Net Interest Income  
    Change in December 31,  December 31,  
    Prime Rate  2015  2014   2015  2014  
    Up 200bps  5.50 %  5.25 %   2.23 %  2.06 %  
    Up 100   4.50    4.25     1.58    1.46    
    No Change   3.50    3.25     ―      ―      
    Down 25   3.25    3.00     (0.69)   0.33    


Table 25
Interest Sensitivity Simulation Analysis
   
Interest Rate Scenario Annualized Hypothetical Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
  Prime Rate 
Linear Change in Prime Rate December 31, December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Up 200 bps 6.50% 5.75% 3.09 % 3.13 %
Up 100 5.50
 4.75
 2.07
 2.14
No Change 4.50
 3.75
 
 
Down 25 4.25
 3.50
 (1.06) (0.93)
Down 100 3.50
 2.75
 (6.62) NA
The MRLCC has established parameters related to interest sensitivity that prescribe a maximum negative impact on net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In the event the results of the Simulation model fall outside the established parameters, management will make recommendations to the MRLCC on the most appropriate response given the current economic forecast. The following parameters and interest rate scenarios are considered BB&T’s primary measures of interest rate risk:

·Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 2% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for four months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining eight month period.

·Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for eight months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining four month period.

Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 2% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for four months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining eight month period.

Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for eight months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining four month period.

If a parallel rate change of 200 basis points cannot be modeled due to a low level of rates, a proportional limit applies. Management currently only models a negative 25 basis point decline because larger parallel declines would have resulted in a Federal funds rate of less than zero. In a situation such as this,applies, and the maximum negative impact on net interest income is adjusted on a proportional basis. Regardless of the proportional limit, the negative risk exposure limit will be the greater of the 1%4% or the proportional limit.

Management has also established a maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for an immediate 100 basis points parallel change in rates and 8% for an immediate 200 basis points parallel change in rates. As noted above, managementManagement currently only models up to a negative 25100 basis point decline, and the maximum negative impact on net interest income is adjusted on a proportional basis. Regardless of the proportional limit, the negative risk exposure limit will be the greater of 2%4% or the proportional limit. These “interest"interest rate shock”shock" limits are designed to create an outer band of acceptable risk based upon a significant and immediate change in rates.


Management also considers potential negativehas temporarily suspended its interest rate scenarios, which implies that a depositor would pay a premium for a financial institutionexposure limits to hold fundsdeclining interest rates. As the Federal Reserve has started to raise rates, competitive pressure on deposit. In such a scenario, some depositors may choose to withdraw their deposits in lieu of paying an interest rate to BB&T to hold such deposits.deposit rates has not materialized. As a result, management considers potential pricing and structure changes, such asasset repricing in excess of liability repricing is causing the movementmeasured exposure to a primarily fee-based deposit system. Negativedeclining rates would also diminish the spreads on loans and securities. As a result, management considersto increase. Management evaluates its interest rate floors or rate index floors in loans to mitigate this risk. BB&T purchases both fixed and variable rate securities. The fixed rate securities would be beneficial in a negative interest rate environment.

risk position each month.

Management must also consider how the balance sheet and interest rate risk position could be impacted by changes in balance sheet mix. Liquidity in the banking industry has been very strong during the current economic cycle. Much of this liquidity increase has been due to a significant increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Consistent with the industry, Branch Bank has seen a significant increase in this funding source. The behavior of these deposits is one of the most important assumptions used in determining the interest rate risk position of BB&T. A loss of these deposits in the future would reduce the asset sensitivity of BB&T’s balance sheet as the Company increases interest-bearing funds to offset the loss of this advantageous funding source.

68

Beta represents the correlation between overall market interest rates and the rates paid by BB&T on interest-bearing deposits. BB&T applies an average beta of approximately 80%50% to its managed rate depositsnon-maturity interest bearing deposit accounts for determining its interest rate sensitivity. Managed rate deposits are high beta, premium money market andNon-maturity interest bearing deposit accounts include interest checking accounts, which attract significant client funds when neededsavings accounts, and money market accounts that do not have a contractual maturity. Due to support balance sheet growth.current market conditions the actual deposit beta on non-maturity interest bearing deposits has been less than 15%; however, BB&T expects the beta to increase as rates continue to rise. BB&T regularly conducts sensitivity on other key variables to determine the impact they could have on the interest rate risk position. This allows BB&T to evaluate the likely impact on its balance sheet management strategies due to a more extreme variation in a key assumption than expected.


The following table shows the effect that the loss of demand deposits and an associated increase in managed rate deposits would have on BB&T’s interest-rate sensitivity position. For purposes of this analysis, BB&T modeled the incremental beta for the replacement of the lost demand deposits at 100%.

Table 31
Deposit Mix Sensitivity Analysis
                 
          Results Assuming a Decrease in 
    Increase in  Base Scenario Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits 
    Rates  at December 31, 2015 (1) $1 Billion $5 Billion 
    Up 200bps   2.23 %  2.01 %  1.12 % 
    Up 100    1.58    1.44    0.89   
                 
                 
(1)The base scenario is equal to the annualized hypothetical percentage change in net interest income at December 31, 2015 as presented in the preceding table.

Table 26
Deposit Mix Sensitivity Analysis
     
Increase in Rates Base Scenario at December 31, 2017 (1) Results Assuming a Decrease in Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits
  $1 Billion $5 Billion
Up 200 bps 3.09% 2.88% 2.04%
Up 100 2.07
 1.94
 1.42
(1) The base scenario is equal to the annualized hypothetical percentage change in net interest income at December 31, 2017 as presented in the preceding table.

If rates increased 200 basis points, BB&T could absorb the loss of $10.1$14.8 billion, or 22.0%27.5%, of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and replace them with managed rate deposits with a beta of 100% before becoming neutral to interest rate changes.

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on EVE. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing and deposit sensitivity.

Table 32
EVE Simulation Analysis
                   
             Hypothetical Percentage 
       EVE/Assets Change in EVE 
    Change in  December 31,  December 31, 
    Rates  2015  2014  2015  2014 
    Up 200bps  10.9 %  10.9 %  0.6 %  (1.5)% 
    Up 100   11.0    11.1    1.6    0.6   
    No Change   10.8    11.1    ―      ―     
    Down 25   10.7    10.9    (1.1)   (1.0)  

Table 27
EVE Simulation Analysis
     
  EVE/Assets Hypothetical Percentage Change in EVE
  December 31, December 31,
Change in Rates 2017 2016 2017 2016
Up 200 bps 11.4% 11.6% (5.1)% 1.3 %
Up 100 11.9
 11.7
 (0.9) 1.8
No Change 12.0
 11.5
 
 
Down 25 11.9
 11.3
 (0.7) (1.1)
Down 100 11.1
 NA
 (7.7) NA
Market Risk from Trading Activities

BB&T also manages market risk from trading activities which consists of acting as a financial intermediary to provide its customers access to derivatives, foreign exchange and securities markets. Trading market risk is managed through the use of statistical and non-statistical risk measures and limits. BB&T utilizes a historical VaR methodology to measure and aggregate risks across its covered trading LOBs.BUs. This methodology uses two years of historical data to estimate economic outcomes for a one-day time horizon at a 99% confidence level. The average 99% one-day VaR and the maximum daily VaR for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 were each less than $1 million. Market risk disclosures under Basel II.5 are available in the Additional Disclosures section of the Investor Relations site onwww.bbt.comBBT.com.


Liquidity

Liquidity represents the continuing ability to meet funding needs, including deposit withdrawals, timely repayment of borrowings and other liabilities, and funding of loan commitments. In addition to the level of liquid assets, such as cash, cash equivalents and AFS securities, many other factors affect the ability to meet liquidity needs, including access to a variety of funding sources, maintaining borrowing capacity in national money markets, growing core deposits, the repayment of loans and the ability to securitize or package loans for sale.

69

BB&T monitors the ability to meet customer demand for funds under both normal and stressed market conditions. In considering its liquidity position, management evaluates BB&T’s funding mix based on client core funding, client rate-sensitive funding and non-client rate-sensitivenational markets funding. In addition, management also evaluates exposure to rate-sensitive funding sources that mature in one year or less. Management also measures liquidity needs against 30 days of stressed cash outflows for Branch Bank.Bank and BB&T. To ensure a strong liquidity position, management maintains a liquid asset buffer of cash on hand and highly liquid unpledged securities. BB&T follows regulation YYthe FRB's enhanced prudential standards for purposes of determining the liquid asset buffer. BB&T’s policy is to use the greater of 5% or a range of projected net cash outflows over a 30 day period. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, BB&T’s liquid asset buffer was 13.5%14.3% and 13.6%12.6%, respectively, of total assets.


BB&T is considered to be a “modified LCR”"modified LCR" holding company. BB&T would be subject to full LCR requirements if its operations were to fall under the “internationally active” rules, which would generally be triggered if BB&T’s assets were to increase above $250 billion.billion or if it were to be considered internationally active. BB&T produces LCR calculations to effectively manage the position of High-Quality Liquid Assets and the balance sheet deposit mix to optimize BB&T’s&T's liquidity position. BB&T’s&T's LCR was approximately 130%138% at December 31, 2015,2017, compared to the regulatory minimum for such entities of 90%100%, which puts BB&T in full compliance with the rule. The regulatory minimum will increaseLCR can experience volatility due to 100% on January 1, 2017. issues like maturing debt rolling into the 30 day measurement period, or client inflows and outflows. The daily change in BB&T’s LCR can be positive or negative, with negative changes representing a reduction in measured liquidity. The negative changes averaged less than 2% during 2017 with a maximum change of approximately 11%.

As noted above, BB&T is currently subject to the modified LCR requirement. BB&T routinely evaluates the impact of becoming subject to the full LCR requirement. This includes an evaluation of the changes to the balance sheet and investment strategy that would be necessary to comply with the requirement. Management does not currently expect the required changes to have a material impact on BB&T’s financial condition or results of operations.


On April 27, 2016, the OCC, the FRB and the FDIC released a notice of proposed rulemaking for the US version of the net stable funding ratio. Under the proposal, BB&T will be a "modified NSFR" holding company. BB&T would be subject to full NSFR requirements if it has $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more in total on-balance sheet foreign exposure. BB&T is evaluating the information in the proposal but does not currently expect a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

Parent Company

The purpose of the Parent Company is to serve as the primary source of capital for the operating subsidiaries, with assets primarily consisting of cash on deposit with Branch Bank, equity investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, accounts receivable from subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous assets. The principal obligations of the Parent Company are payments on long-term debt. The main sources of funds for the Parent Company are dividends and management fees from subsidiaries,subsidiary, repayments of advances to subsidiaries, and proceeds from the issuance of equity and long-term debt. The primary uses of funds by the Parent Company are for investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, dividend payments to common and preferred shareholders, retirement of common stock and payments on long-term debt.

The primary source of funds used for Parent Company cash requirements was dividends received from subsidiaries. See Note 16 “Parent"Note 15. Parent Company Financial Statements”Statements" for additional information regarding dividends from subsidiaries. In addition, the Parent Company issued $1.0 billion of senior notessubsidiaries and repaid $934 million of long-term debt. During periods that the Parent Company has funds raised through master note agreements with commercial clients, these funds are placed in a note receivable at Branch Bank primarily for its use in meeting short-term funding needs and, to a lesser extent, to support the short-term cash needs of the Parent Company. There were no master notes outstanding as of December 31, 2015 or 2014.

debt transactions.

Liquidity at the Parent Company is more susceptible to market disruptions. BB&T prudently manages cash levels at the Parent Company to cover a minimum of one year of projected contractual cash outflows which includes unfunded external commitments, debt service, preferred dividends and scheduled debt maturities without the benefit of any new cash infusions. Generally, BB&T maintains a significant buffer above the projected one year of contractual cash outflows. In determining the buffer, BB&T considers cash requirements for common and preferred dividends, unfunded commitments to affiliates, being a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries and being able to withstand sustained market disruptions that could limit access to the capital markets. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Parent Company had 3629 months and 3125 months, respectively, of cash on hand to satisfy projected contractual cash outflows as described above.

and 23 months and 19 months, respectively, taking into account common stock dividends.

Branch Bank

BB&T carefully manages liquidity risk at Branch Bank. Branch Bank’s primary source of funding is customer deposits. Continued access to customer deposits is highly dependent on the confidence the public has in the stability of the bank and its ability to return funds to the client when requested. BB&T maintains a strong focus on its reputation in the market to ensure continued access to client deposits. BB&T integrates its risk appetite into its overall risk management framework to ensure the bank does not exceed its risk tolerance through its lending and other risk taking functions and thus risk becoming undercapitalized. BB&T believes that sufficient capital is paramount to maintaining the confidence of its depositors and other funds providers. BB&T has extensive capital management processes in place to ensure it maintains sufficient capital to absorb losses and maintain a highly capitalized position that will instill confidence in the bank and allow continued access to deposits and other funding sources. Branch Bank monitors many liquidity metrics at the bank including funding concentrations, diversification, maturity distribution, contingent funding needs and ability to meet liquidity requirements under times of stress.

70

Branch Bank has several major sources of funding to meet its liquidity requirements, including access to capital markets through issuance of senior or subordinated bank notes and institutional CDs, access to the FHLB system, dealer repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements with commercial clients, access to the overnight and term Federal funds markets, use of a Cayman branch facility, access to retail brokered CDs and a borrower in custody program with the FRB for the discount window. As of December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T has approximately $70.6$80.9 billion of secured borrowing capacity, which represents approximately 6.38.8 times the amount of one year wholesale funding maturities.


The ability to raise funding at competitive prices is affected by the rating agencies’ views of the Parent Company’s and Branch Bank’s credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. Management meets with the rating agencies on a regular basis to discuss current outlooks. The ratings for BB&T and Branch Bank by the major rating agencies are detailed in the table below:


Table 33
Table 28
Credit Ratings of BB&T Corporation and Branch Bank
December 31, 20152017
        
 S&P Moody's S&PFitch Moody'sFitchDBRS
BB&T Corporation:       
Commercial PaperA-2 P-1N/A F1 R-1(low)
IssuerA- A2 A+ A(high)
LT/Senior debtA- A2 A+ A(high)
Subordinated debtBBB+ A2 A A
Preferred stockBBB- Baa1(hyb)BBB-BBB(high)
        
Branch Bank:       
Bank financial strengthN/AN/Aa+N/A
Long term depositsN/A Aa1 AA- AA(low)
LT/Senior unsecured bank notesA A1 A+ AA(low)
Long term issuerAA1A+A(high)
Other long term senior obligationsA N/A A+ AA(low)
Other short term senior obligationsA-1 N/A F1 R-1(middle)
Short term bank notesA-1 P-1 F1 R-1(middle)
Short term depositsN/A P-1 F1+ R-1(middle)
Subordinated bank notesA- A2 A A(high)
        
Ratings Outlook:       
Credit TrendStable Stable Stable Stable

BB&T and Branch Bank have Contingency Funding Plans designed to ensure that liquidity sources are sufficient to meet their ongoing obligations and commitments, particularly in the event of a liquidity contraction. These plans are designed to examine and quantify the organization’s liquidity under various “stress”"stress" scenarios. Additionally, the plans provide a framework for management and other critical personnel to follow in the event of a liquidity contraction or in anticipation of such an event. The plans address authority for activation and decision making, liquidity options and the responsibilities of key departments in the event of a liquidity contraction. The liquidity options available to management could include seeking secured funding, asset sales, and under the most extreme scenarios, curtailing new loan originations.

Management believes current sources of liquidity are adequate to meet BB&T’s current requirements and plans for continued growth. See Note 5 “Premises"Note 4. Premises and Equipment,” Note 9 “Long-Term Debt”" "Note 8. Long-Term Debt" and Note 14 “Commitments"Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Contingencies" for additional information regarding outstanding balances of sources of liquidity and contractual commitments and obligations.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Related Party Transactions

The following table presents, as of December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T’s contractual obligations by payment date. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient. The table excludes liabilities recorded where management cannot reasonably estimate the timing of any payments that may be required in connection with these liabilities. Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in Note 14 “Commitments"Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Contingencies."

Table 29
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
December 31, 2017
           
(Dollars in millions) Total Less than 1 Year 1 to 3 Years 3 to 5 Years After 5 Years
Long-term debt and capital leases $23,559
 $2,446
 $10,845
 $6,107
 $4,161
Operating leases 1,511
 255
 427
 320
 509
Commitments to fund affordable housing investments 928
 536
 349
 20
 23
Private equity and other investments commitments (1) 143
 39
 69
 28
 7
Time deposits 13,170
 8,379
 3,804
 970
 17
Contractual interest payments (2) 3,004
 751
 1,113
 560
 580
Purchase obligations (3) 1,335
 608
 544
 160
 23
Nonqualified benefit plan obligations (4) 1,020
 15
 31
 33
 941
Total contractual cash obligations $44,670
 $13,029
 $17,182
 $8,198
 $6,261
71
(1)Based on estimated payment dates.
(2)Includes accrued interest, future contractual interest obligations and the impact of hedges in a loss position. Other derivatives are excluded. Variable rate payments are based upon the rate in effect at December 31, 2017.
(3)Represents obligations to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding. Many of the purchase obligations have terms that are not fixed and determinable and are included in the table above based upon the estimated timing and amount of payment. In addition, certain of the purchase agreements contain clauses that would allow BB&T to cancel the agreement with specified notice; however, that impact is not included in the table above.
(4)Although technically unfunded plans, Rabbi Trusts and insurance policies on the lives of certain of the covered employees are available to finance future benefit plan payments.

Table 34
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
December 31, 2015
                     
        Less than 1 to 3 3 to 5 After 5 
      Total One Year Years Years Years 
                     
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Long-term debt and capital leases$ 23,346  $ 5,471  $ 6,044  $ 4,742  $ 7,089  
 Operating leases  1,592    250    429    322    591  
 Commitments to fund affordable housing investments  654    354    260    21    19  
 Private equity commitments (1)  233    55    110    47    21  
 Time deposits  17,558    11,813    4,263    1,452    30  
 Contractual interest payments (2)  3,798    784    1,206    878    930  
 Purchase obligations (3)  341    163    142    25    11  
  Total contractual cash obligations$ 47,522  $ 18,890  $ 12,454  $ 7,487  $ 8,691  
                     
                     
 (1)Maturities are based on estimated payment dates. 
 (2)Includes accrued interest, future contractual interest obligations and the impact of hedges. Non-hedging derivatives are excluded. Variable rate payments are based upon the rate in effect at December 31, 2015.
 (3)Includes purchase obligations for goods and services covered by noncancellable contracts.

The table above excludes the future cash payments associated with the nonqualified pension plans. Refer to Note 13 “Benefit Plans” for information related to future payments under these plans.

BB&T’s commitments include investments in affordable housing and historic building rehabilitation projects throughout its market area and private equity funds. Refer to Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”Policies" and to Note 14 “Commitments"Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Contingencies" for further discussion of these commitments.

In addition, BB&T enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial risks. A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the fair value representing the net present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are written in amounts referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis for calculating payments between counterparties and are not a measure of financial risk. Therefore, the derivative liabilities recorded on the balance sheet as of December 31, 20152017 do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”Policies" and Note 18 “Derivative"Note 17. Derivative Financial Instruments” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Instruments."

In the ordinary course of business, BB&T indemnifies its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law against liabilities arising from litigation. BB&T also issues standard representation and warranties in underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition agreements, loan sales, brokerage activities and other similar arrangements. Counterparties in many of these indemnifications provide similar indemnifications to BB&T. Although these agreements often do not specify limitations, BB&T does not believe that any payments related to these guarantees would materially change the financial condition or results of operations of BB&T.

BB&T holds public funds in certain states that do not require 100% collateralization on public fund bank deposits. In these states, should the failure of another public fund depository institution result in a loss for the public entity, the resulting uncollateralized deposit shortfall would have to be absorbed on a pro-rata basis (based upon the public deposits held by each bank within the respective state) by the remaining financial institutions holding public funds in that state.

BB&T monitors deposits levels relative to the total public deposits held by all depository institutions within these states.

As a member of the FHLB, BB&T is required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock. The board of directors of the FHLB can increase the minimum investment requirements in the event it has concluded that additional capital is required to allow it to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Because the extent of any obligation to increase BB&T’s investment in the FHLB depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, potential future payments to the FHLB are not determinable.

72

In the normal course of business, BB&T is also a party to financial instruments to meet the financing needs of clients and to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk.certain risks. Such financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and certain contractual agreements, including standby letters of credit and financial guarantee arrangements. Further discussion of BB&T’s commitments is included in Note 14 “Commitments"Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies”Contingencies" and Note 17 “Fair"Note 16. Fair Value Disclosures” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Table 35
Mortgage Indemnification, Recourse and Repurchase Reserves Activity (1)
             
    Year Ended December 31, 
    2015 2014 2013 
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance, at beginning of period$ 94  $ 72  $ 71  
  Payments  (5)   (23)   (27) 
  Expense  (15)   45    28  
  Acquisitions  5    —    —  
 Balance, at end of period$ 79  $ 94  $ 72  
             
             
(1)Excludes the FHA-insured mortgage loan reserve of $85 million established during 2014.

Disclosures."


Table 30
Mortgage Indemnification, Recourse and Repurchase Reserves Activity (1)
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Balance, at beginning of period $40
 $79
 $94
Payments 
 (2) (5)
Expense (3) (37) (15)
Acquisitions 
 
 5
Balance, at end of period $37
 $40
 $79
(1)Excludes the FHA-insured mortgage loan reserve of $85 million established during 2014 and settled in 2016.
Related Party Transactions

The Company may transact with its officers, directors and other related parties in the ordinary course of business. These transactions include substantially the same terms as comparable third-party arrangements and are in compliance with applicable banking regulations.

Capital

The maintenance of appropriate levels of capital is a management priority and is monitored on a regular basis. BB&T’s principal goals related to the maintenance of capital are to provide adequate capital to support BB&T’s risk profile consistent with the Board-approved risk appetite, provide financial flexibility to support future growth and client needs, comply with relevant laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance, achieve optimal credit ratings for BB&T and its subsidiaries and provide a competitive return to shareholders.

Management regularly monitors the capital position of BB&T on both a consolidated and bank level basis. In this regard, management’s overriding policy is to maintain capital at levels that are in excess of the operating capital guidelines,targets, which are above the regulatory “well capitalized”"well capitalized" levels. Management has implemented stressed capital ratio minimum guidelinestargets to evaluate whether capital ratios calculated with planned capital actions are likely to remain above minimums specified by the FRB for the annual CCAR. Breaches of stressed minimum guidelinestargets prompt a review of the planned capital actions included in BB&T’s capital plan.

Table 36
BB&T's Internal Capital Guidelines for Basel III
  Operating Stressed 
 Tier 1 Capital Ratio 10.0 %  7.5 % 
 Total Capital Ratio 12.0    9.5   
 Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio 8.0    5.5   
 Tangible Common Equity Ratio 6.0    4.0   
 Tier 1 Common Equity Ratio 8.5    6.0   

Table 31
BB&T's Capital Targets
     
  Operating Stressed
CET1 to risk-weighted assets 8.5% 6.0%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets 10.0
 7.5
Total capital to risk-weighted assets 12.0
 9.5
Leverage ratio 8.0
 5.5
Tangible common equity ratio 6.0
 4.0

Table 32
Capital Requirements Under Basel III
             
  Minimum Capital Well-Capitalized Minimum Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer BB&T Target
    2017 2018 2019 (1) 
CET1 to risk-weighted assets 4.5% 6.5% 5.750% 6.375% 7.000% 8.5%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets 6.0
 8.0
 7.250
 7.875
 8.500
 10.0
Total capital to risk-weighted assets 8.0
 10.0
 9.250
 9.875
 10.500
 12.0
Leverage ratio 4.0
 5.0
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 8.0
(1)BB&T's goal is to maintain capital levels above the 2019 requirements.

Payments of cash dividends and repurchases of common shares are the methods used to manage any excess capital generated. In addition, management closely monitors the Parent Company’s double leverage ratio (investments in subsidiaries as a percentage of shareholders’ equity). The active management of the subsidiaries’ equity capital, as described above, is the process used to manage this important driver of Parent Company liquidity and is a key element in the management of BB&T’s capital position.

73


Management intends to maintain capital at Branch Bank at levels that will result in classification as “well-capitalized”"well-capitalized" for regulatory purposes. Secondarily, it is management’s intent to maintain Branch Bank’s capital at levels that result in regulatory risk-based capital ratios that are generally comparable with peers of similar size, complexity and risk profile. If the capital levels of Branch Bank increase above these guidelines, excess capital may be transferred to the Parent Company in the form of special dividend payments, subject to regulatory and other operating considerations.

While nonrecurring events or management decisions may result in the Company temporarily falling below its operating minimum guidelines for one or more of these ratios, it is management’s intent through capital planning to return to these targeted operating minimums within a reasonable period of time. Such temporary decreases below the operating minimums shown above are not considered an infringement of BB&T’s overall capital policy, provided a return above the minimums is forecast to occur within a reasonable time period.

BB&T regularly performs stress testing on its capital levels and is required to periodically submit the company’s capital plans to the banking regulators. The FRB did not object to the Company’s 20152017 capital plan, and the 20162018 capital plan is expected to be submitted during April 2016.2018. Management’s capital deployment plan in order of preference is to focus on 1) organic growth, 2) dividends strategicand 3) acquisitions and/or share repurchases depending on opportunities in the marketplace and share repurchases.

our interest and ability to proceed with acquisitions.

Risk-based capital ratios, which include Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Tier 1 Common Equity, are calculated based on regulatory guidance related to the measurement of capital and risk-weighted assets. The decrease

Branch Bank's capital ratios are presented in regulatorythe following table:
Table 33
Capital Ratios - Branch Bank
 
  December 31,
  2017 2016
CET1 to risk-weighted assets 11.3% 11.5%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets 11.3
 11.5
Total capital to risk-weighted assets 13.3
 13.6
Leverage ratio 9.4
 9.6

BB&T's capital was primarily due to current year acquisition activity, partially offset by earningsratios are presented in excess of dividends.

 Table 37 
 Capital Ratios 
             
     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
     Basel III Basel I 
             
     (Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 
 Risk-based:        
  Common equity Tier 1  10.3 %  N/A  
  Tier 1  11.8     12.4 % 
  Total  14.3     14.9   
 Leverage capital  9.8     9.9   
             
 Non-GAAP capital measures (1):        
  Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets  7.7 %   8.0 % 
  Tangible common equity per common share$ 19.82   $ 19.86   
             
 Calculations of tangible common equity and tangible assets (1):        
  Total shareholders' equity$ 27,340   $ 24,377   
  Less:        
   Preferred stock  2,603     2,603   
   Noncontrolling interests  34     88   
   Intangible assets  9,234     7,374   
  Tangible common equity$ 15,469   $ 14,312   
             
  Total assets$ 209,947   $ 186,834   
  Less:        
   Intangible assets  9,234     7,374   
  Tangible assets$ 200,713   $ 179,460   
             
 Risk-weighted assets (2)$ 166,611   $ 143,675   
 Common shares outstanding at end of period  780,337     720,698   
             
the following table:
Table 34
Capital Ratios - BB&T Corporation
   
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 2017 2016
Risk-based:    
CET1 10.2% 10.2%
Tier 1 11.9
 12.0
Total 13.9
 14.1
Leverage capital 9.9
 10.0
     
Non-GAAP capital measures (1):  
  
Tangible common equity per common share $20.80
 $20.18
     
Calculations of tangible common equity (1):    
Total shareholders' equity $29,695
 $29,926
Less:    
Preferred stock 3,053
 3,053
Noncontrolling interests 47
 45
Intangible assets 10,329
 10,492
Tangible common equity $16,266
 $16,336
     
Risk-weighted assets $177,217
 $176,138
Common shares outstanding at end of period 782,006
 809,475
(1)Tangible common equity and related ratios are non-GAAP measures. Management uses these measures to assess the quality of capital and believes that investors may find them useful in their analysis of the Company. These capital measures are not necessarily comparable to similar capital measures that may be presented by other companies.


During 2017, BB&T completed $1.6 billion of stock repurchases and paid $1.0 billion in common stock dividends, which resulted in a total payout ratio of 117.9% for the year. Effective December 31, 2017, BB&T adopted new accounting guidance related to tax reform legislation passed in 2017, and reclassified deferred income taxes from AOCI and increased retained earnings $247 million, which also increased regulatory capital and the related ratios.

During July 2017, BB&T's Board of Directors approved a $0.03 increase in the quarterly dividend, which increased the amount of the quarterly dividend to $0.33 per share. As of December 31, 2017, the remaining stock repurchases authorized by the Board of Directors totaled $640 million. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company repurchased approximately 5.9 million shares of common stock totaling $320 million.

Table 35
Quarterly Financial Summary – Unaudited
     
  2017 2016
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter Fourth Quarter Third Quarter Second Quarter First Quarter
Consolidated Summary of Operations:                
Interest income $1,898
 $1,877
 $1,824
 $1,775
 $1,745
 $1,795
 $1,805
 $1,721
Interest expense 254
 230
 189
 166
 180
 185
 188
 192
Provision for credit losses 138
 126
 135
 148
 129
 148
 111
 184
Noninterest income 1,225
 1,166
 1,220
 1,171
 1,162
 1,164
 1,130
 1,016
Noninterest expense 1,855
 1,745
 1,742
 2,102
 1,668
 1,711
 1,797
 1,545
Provision for income taxes 209
 294
 304
 104
 287
 273
 252
 246
Net income 667

648
 674
 426
 643
 642
 587
 570
Noncontrolling interest 9
 8
 (1) 5
 7
 
 3
 6
Preferred stock dividends 44
 43
 44
 43
 44
 43
 43
 37
Net income available to common shareholders $614
 $597
 $631
 $378
 $592
 $599
 $541
 $527
Basic EPS $0.78
 $0.75
 $0.78
 $0.47
 $0.73
 $0.74
 $0.67
 $0.67
Diluted EPS $0.77
 $0.74
 $0.77
 $0.46
 $0.72
 $0.73
 $0.66
 $0.67
                 
Selected Average Balances:                
Assets $222,525
 $220,732
 $221,018
 $219,961
 $220,165
 $222,065
 $223,399
 $210,102
Securities, at amortized cost 48,093
 45,968
 45,410
 44,607
 44,881
 47,152
 48,510
 44,580
Loans and leases (1) 144,089
 144,181
 144,327
 143,698
 144,569
 143,689
 143,097
 135,628
Total earning assets 195,305
 193,073
 193,386
 192,564
 192,574
 193,909
 194,822
 183,612
Deposits 157,959
 157,414
 160,263
 161,383
 160,118
 159,503
 160,338
 149,867
Short-term borrowings 6,342
 5,983
 2,748
 2,105
 2,373
 2,128
 2,951
 2,771
Long-term debt 22,639
 21,459
 21,767
 20,757
 21,563
 23,428
 23,272
 22,907
Total interest-bearing liabilities 132,652
 131,367
 132,205
 133,150
 132,633
 134,500
 137,760
 129,342
Shareholders' equity 29,853
 29,948
 30,302
 29,903
 30,054
 29,916
 29,610
 27,826
(2)
(1)Risk-weighted assetsLoans and leases are determined based on the regulatory capital requirements in effect for the periods presented.net of unearned income and include LHFS.

The Company’s estimated common equity tier 1 ratio using the Basel III standardized approach on a fully phased-in basis was 10.0% at December 31, 2015.

74

Table 38
Quarterly Financial Summary―Unaudited (1)
                           
    2015 2014
    Fourth Third Second First Fourth Third Second First
    Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
                           
    (Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Consolidated Summary of Operations:                       
 Interest income$ 1,695  $ 1,650  $ 1,489  $ 1,493  $ 1,518  $ 1,541  $ 1,537  $ 1,546 
 Interest expense  191    186    177    181    183    192    194    199 
 Provision for credit losses  129    103    97    99    83    34    74    60 
 Securities gains (losses), net  ―      (2)   (1)   ―      ―      (5)   -    2 
 Other noninterest income  1,015    990    1,020    997    1,022    954    958    925 
 Noninterest expense  1,597    1,594    1,653    1,422    1,394    1,539    1,534    1,385 
 Provision for income taxes  251    222    80    241    277    172    216    256 
 Net income  542    533    501    547    603    553    477    573 
 Noncontrolling interest  3    4    10    22    15    4    16    40 
 Preferred stock dividends  37    37    37    37    37    37    37    37 
 Net income available to common                       
  shareholders$ 502  $ 492  $ 454  $ 488  $ 551  $ 512  $ 424  $ 496 
 Basic EPS$ 0.64  $ 0.64  $ 0.63  $ 0.68  $ 0.77  $ 0.71  $ 0.59  $ 0.70 
 Diluted EPS$ 0.64  $ 0.64  $ 0.62  $ 0.67  $ 0.75  $ 0.70  $ 0.58  $ 0.68 
                           
Selected Average Balances:                       
 Assets$ 209,217  $ 203,531  $ 189,033  $ 187,297  $ 186,462  $ 186,339  $ 185,094  $ 182,428 
 Securities, at amortized cost  43,468    43,048    40,727    41,133    40,817    40,566    40,656    40,117 
 Loans and leases (2)  136,190    132,499    122,056    120,235    119,912    120,471    118,510    116,372 
 Total earning assets  183,151    178,464    165,428    163,367    162,559    162,879    161,143    158,364 
 Deposits  148,491    143,837    131,868    129,531    130,315    130,608    129,599    125,718 
 Short-term borrowings  2,698    3,572    3,080    3,539    3,095    3,321    2,962    4,321 
 Long-term debt  24,306    23,394    22,616    23,043    22,139    22,069    22,206    22,432 
 Total interest-bearing liabilities  129,671    126,650    116,062    116,412    116,419    117,895    118,133    117,079 
 Shareholders' equity  27,378    26,612    24,888    24,566    24,574    24,151    23,841    23,233 
                           
                           
(1)Effective January 1, 2015, BB&T adopted new guidance related to investments in qualified affordable housing projects. See Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information.
(2)Loans and leases are net of unearned income and include LHFS.

Fourth Quarter Results

Consolidated net income available to common shareholders for the fourth quarter of 20152017 totaling $502$614 million was down 8.9%up 3.7% compared to $551$592 million earned during the same period in 2014.2016. On a diluted per common share basis, earnings for the fourth quarter of 20152017 were $0.64, down 14.7%$0.77, up 6.9% compared to $0.75$0.72 for the same period in 2014.2016. BB&T’s results of operations for the fourth quarter of 20152017 produced an annualized return on average assets of 1.03%1.19% and an annualized return on average common shareholders’ equity of 8.06%9.10%, compared to prior year ratios of 1.28%1.16% and 9.99%8.75%, respectively. These results include merger-related and restructuring charges of $50 million and $18 million, respectively.

Total TE revenues on a FTE basis were $2.6$2.9 billion for the fourth quarter of 2015, up $1642017, an increase of $139 million compared to the earlier quarter. This reflects an increase was driven by a $171of $76 million increase in taxable-equivalent net interest income largely the resultand an increase of the Susquehanna and The Bank of Kentucky acquisitions

$63 million in noninterest income.



Net interest margin was 3.35%3.43%, up 11 basis points compared to 3.36% for the earlier quarter. Average earning assets increased $20.6$2.7 billion. The increase in average earnings assets reflects a $3.2 billion or 12.7%, whileincrease in average securities, partially offset by a $480 million decrease in average total loans and leases. Average interest-bearing liabilities were essentially flat compared to the earlier quarter, as the growth in earning assets was funded by noninterest-bearing deposits, which increased $13.3$2.9 billion or 11.4%, bothcompared to the earlier quarter. Average interest-bearing deposits decreased $5.0 billion, which was offset by increases of which were primarily driven by the Susquehanna$1.1 billion in average long-term debt and The Bank of Kentucky acquisitions.$4.0 billion in average short-term borrowings. The annualized yield on the total loan portfolio for the fourth quarter of 2017 was 4.31%, an increase of two4.50 percent, up 26 basis points compared to the earlier quarter, which primarily reflects the impact of the current year acquisitions, partially offset by runoff of loans acquired from the FDIC.quarter. The annualized fully taxable-equivalent yield on the average securities portfolio for the fourth quarter was 2.30%,2.42 percent, up 29 basis points compared to 2.45% for the earlier period. This decline reflects lower rates on mortgage-backed securities, runoff of securities acquired from the FDIC and larger holdings in U.S. Treasuries.

75

The average annualized cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.24%0.40%, a decline of oneup 18 basis pointpoints compared to the earlier quarter. The average annualized rate paid on long-term debt was 2.11%2.36%, up 20 basis points compared to 2.22% for the earlier quarter. This decreaseThe average annualized rate on short-term borrowings was primarily due1.13%, up 79 basis points compared to early extinguishmentsthe earlier quarter. The higher rates on interest-bearing liabilities reflect the impact of higher cost FHLB advances.

Excluding acquired from FDIC and PCI loans, therate increases.


The provision for credit losses was $128$138 million compared to $84$129 million in the earlier quarter. Net charge-offs for the fourth quarter of 2017 totaled $130 million compared to $151 million for the earlier quarter. The earlier quarter included a $24 million allowance release related to the sale of nonperforming mortgage loans, which also resulted in $4$15 million of net recoveries. Net charge-offs for PCI loans.

Noninterest income was $1.2 billion, an increase of $63 million from the earlier quarter. This increase was due to higher fees from the majority of our noninterest revenue sources as a result of higher business activity, as well as higher income from SBIC and other investments.

Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2015, excluding loans acquired from the FDIC and PCI, totaled $130 million, compared to $102 million for the earlier quarter.

The $7 million decrease in noninterest income2017 was driven by lower insurance income, mortgage banking income and investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions, partially offset by improved FDIC loss share income and higher other income.

Noninterest expense was $1.6$1.9 billion, for the fourth quarter of 2015, an increase of $203up $187 million compared to the earlier quarter. This increase was primarily driven by the Susquehanna and The Bankpreviously mentioned tax reform actions, as well as higher loan-related expenses as the fourth quarter of Kentucky acquisitions, which resulted in higher personnel expense, occupancy and equipment expense, merger-related and restructuring charges and other expense. These increases were partially offset by2016 included a decrease in loan-related expense.

$31 million release of mortgage repurchase reserves.


The provision for income taxes was $251$209 million for the fourth quarter of 2015,2017, compared to $277$287 million for the earlier quarter. This produced an effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 20152017 of 31.7%23.9%, compared to 31.5%30.9% for the earlier quarter.

The provision for income taxes for the current quarter includes a net tax benefit of $43 million related to the impact of tax reform.

Reclassifications

In certain circumstances, reclassifications

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been maderevised to correct errors in the classification of certain transactions related to other assets and other liabilities and were not material to prior period informationconsolidated financial statements. Certain other amounts reported in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported shareholders’ equity or net income.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of BB&T are in accordance with GAAP and conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. The financial position and results of operations are affected by management’s application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the consolidated financial position and/or consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. Understanding BB&T’s accounting policies is fundamental to understanding the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, BB&T’s significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in detail in Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Policies."

The following is a summary of BB&T’s critical accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates, assumptions and judgments. These critical accounting policies are reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on a periodic basis.


ACL

BB&T’s policy is to maintain an ALLL and a RUFC that represent management’s best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolios and off-balance sheet lending commitments at the balance sheet date. Estimates for loan and lease losses are determined by analyzing historical loan and lease losses, historical loan and lease migration to charge-off experience, current trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, expected cash flows on purchased loans, current assessment of problemimpaired loans and leases, the results of regulatory examinations and changes in the size, composition and risk assessment of the loan and lease portfolio. As part of this process, BB&T develops a series of loss estimate factors, which are modeled projections of the frequency, timing and severity of losses. These loss estimate factors are based on historical loss experience, economic and political environmental considerations and any other data that management believes will provide evidence about the expected collectability of outstanding loan and lease amounts. The following table summarizes the loss estimate factors used to determine the ALLL:

Loss Estimate Factor Description
Loss Frequency Indicates the likelihood of a borrower defaulting on a loan
Loss Severity Indicates the amount of estimated loss at the time of default

76

For collectively evaluated loans, the ALLL is determined by multiplying the loan exposure estimated at the time of default by the loss frequency and loss severity factors. For individually evaluated loans, the ALLL is determined through review of data specific to the borrower. For TDRs, default expectations and estimated slower prepayment speeds that are specific to each of the restructured loan populations are incorporated in the determination of the ALLL. Also included in management’s estimates for loan and lease losses are considerations with respect to the impact of current economic events, the outcomes of which are uncertain. These events may include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in overall interest rates, political conditions, legislation that may directly or indirectly affect the banking industry and economic conditions affecting specific geographical areas and industries in which BB&T conducts business.

The methodology used to determine an estimate for the RUFC is inherently similar to the methodology used in calculating the ALLL adjusted for factors specific to binding commitments, including the probability of funding and exposure at the time of funding. A detailed discussion of the methodology used in determining the ALLL and the RUFC is included in Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Policies."

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The vast majority of assets and liabilities carried at fair value are based on either quoted market prices or market prices for similar instruments. See Note 17 “Fair"Note 16. Fair Value Disclosures” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” hereinDisclosures" for additional disclosures regarding the fair value of financial instruments.

Securities

BB&T generally utilizes a third-party pricing service in determining the fair value of its AFS and trading securities. Fair value measurements are derived from market-based pricing matrices that were developed using observable inputs that include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, offers, bids, issuer spreads and broker quotes. Management performs various procedures to evaluate the accuracy of the fair values provided by the third-party service provider. These procedures, which are performed independent of the responsible LOB,BU, include comparison of pricing information received from the third party pricing service to other third party pricing sources, review of additional information provided by the third party pricing service and other third party sources for selected securities and back-testing to compare the price realized on any security sales to the daily pricing information received from the third party pricing service. The IPV committee, which provides oversight to BB&T’s enterprise-wide IPV function, is responsible for oversight of the comparison of pricing information received from the third party pricing service to other third party pricing sources, approving tolerance limits determined by IPV for price comparison exceptions, reviewing significant changes to pricing and valuation policies and reviewing and approving the pricing decisions made on any illiquid and hard-to-price securities. When market observable data is not available, which generally occurs due to the lack of liquidity for certain securities, the valuation of the security is subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management.

BB&T periodically reviews AFS securities with an unrealized loss. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. The purpose of the review is to consider the length of time and the extent to which the market value of a security has been below its amortized cost. The primary factors BB&T considers in determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary are long-term expectations and recent experience regarding principal and interest payments and BB&T’s intent to sell and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell those securities before the anticipated recovery of the amortized cost basis.


MSRs

BB&T has a significant mortgage loan servicing portfolio with two primary classes of MSRs for which it separately manages the economic risk:risks: residential and commercial. ResidentialBoth classes of MSRs are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking income. BB&T uses various derivativeDerivative instruments are used to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions of its residentialthe MSRs.

MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs do occur, the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available. Accordingly, BB&T estimates the fair value of residential MSRs using ana stochastic OAS valuation model to project MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios, which are then discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The OAS model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. BB&T reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions in the OAS model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing the MSR asset.

77

Fair value estimates and assumptions are compared to industry surveys, recent market activity, actual portfolio experience and, when available, observable market data. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, MSRs are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The value of residential MSRs is significantly affected by mortgage interest rates available in the marketplace, which influence mortgage loan prepayment speeds. In general, during periods of declining interest rates, the value of MSRs declines due to increasing prepayments attributable to increased mortgage-refinance activity. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the value of MSRs generally increases due to reduced refinance activity. BB&T typically hedges against market value changes in the MSRs. Refer to Note 7 “Loan Servicing” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”"Note 6. Loan Servicing" for quantitative disclosures reflecting the effect that changes in management’s assumptions would have on the fair value of MSRs.

During 2015 and prior years, commercial

Commercial MSRs were carried atare valued using a cash flow valuation model that calculates the lower of cost or market and amortized over the estimated period that servicing income was expected to be received based on projections of the amount and timingpresent value of estimated future net servicing cash flows. The amountBB&T considers actual and timing ofexpected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing asset amortization wascosts and other economic factors that are determined based on actual resultscurrent market conditions. Compared to residential MSRs, commercial MSR prepayments tend to be significantly lower, subject to the level of prevailing commercial mortgage rates. Commercial loans tend to have prepayment penalty clauses, and updated projections. Effective January 1, 2016,some of the loans may be defeased or assumable. As a result, unlike for residential MSRs, BB&T adopted the fair value methoddoes not employ a stochastic interest rate model for valuation of commercial MSRs. The impact of this adoption was not material.


LHFS


BB&T originates certain mortgage loans for sale to investors that are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. Changes in the fair value are recorded as a component of mortgage banking income, while the related origination costs are recognized in noninterest expense when incurred. The changes in fair value are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the LHFS. BB&T uses various derivative instruments to mitigate the economic effect of changes in fair value of the underlying loans.


Derivative Assets and Liabilities

BB&T uses derivatives to manage various financial risks. BB&T mitigates the credit risk by subjecting counterparties to credit reviews and approvals similar to those used in making loans and other extensions of credit. In addition, certain counterparties are required to provide collateral to BB&T when their unsecured loss positions exceed certain negotiated limits. The fair values of derivative financial instruments are determined based on quoted market prices and internal pricing models that are primarily sensitive touse market observable data. The fair value of interest rate lock commitments, which are related to mortgage loan commitments, is based on quoted market prices adjusted for commitments that BB&T does not expect to fund and includes the value attributable to the net servicing fee.

Private Equity and Similar Investments

BB&T has private equity and similar investments that are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded in other noninterest income each period. In many cases there are no observable market values for these investments and management must estimate the fair value based on a comparison of the operating performance of the company to multiples in the marketplace for similar entities. This analysis requires significant judgment, and actual values in a sale could differ materially from those estimated. As of December 31, 2015, BB&T had $289 million of these investments, which represented less than 1% of total assets.

Intangible Assets

The acquisition method of accounting requires that acquired assets and liabilities are recorded at their fair values. This often involves estimates based on third party valuations or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques, all of which are inherently subjective. The amortization of identified intangible assets is based upon the estimated economic benefits to be received, which is also subjective. Acquisitions typically result in goodwill, which is subject to ongoing periodic impairment tests based on the fair values of the reporting units to which the acquired goodwill relates. Refer to Note 1 “Summary"Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”Policies" for a description of the impairment testing process. Management considers the sensitivity of the significant assumptions in its impairment analysis including consideration of a 10% change in estimated future cash flows or the discount rate for each reporting unit.

78


Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations

BB&T offers various pension plans and postretirement benefit plans to employees. Calculation of the obligations and related expenses under these plans requires the use of actuarial valuation methods and assumptions, which are subject to management judgment and may differ significantly if different assumptions are used. The discount rate assumption used to measure the postretirement benefit obligations is set by reference to a high-quality (AA-rated or higher) corporate bond yield curve and the individual characteristics of the plans such as projected cash flow patterns and payment durations. Management evaluated the sensitivity changes that the expected return on plan assets and the discount rate would have on pension expense for 2015.expense. A decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate would result in additional pension expense of approximately $24$36 million for 2016,2018, while a decrease of 100 basis points in the expected return on plan assets would result in an increase of approximately $46$63 million in pension expense for 2016.2018. Refer to Note 13 “Benefit Plans” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”"Note 12. Benefit Plans" for disclosures related to BB&T’sthe benefit plans.

Income Taxes

The calculation of BB&T’s income tax provision is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments. As part of the Company’s analysis and implementation of business strategies, consideration is given to the tax laws and regulations that apply to the specific facts and circumstances for any tax position under evaluation. For tax positions that are uncertain in nature, management determines whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. For tax positions that meet this threshold, management then estimates the amount of the tax benefit to recognize in the financial statements. Management closely monitors tax developments in order to evaluate the effect they may have on the Company’s overall tax position and the estimates and judgments used in determining the income tax provision and records adjustments as necessary.

79


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting and Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management of BB&T is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. BB&T’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of BB&T’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material impact on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in “Internal"Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)" promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, commonly referred to as the “COSO”"COSO" criteria. Based on this evaluation under the COSO criteria, management concluded that the internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.

2017.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 20152017 that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152017 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their accompanying report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.

80
2017.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BB&T Corporation:

In our opinion,

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BB&T Corporation and its subsidiariesas of December 31, 2017 and 2016,and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BB&T Corporation and its subsidiaries atthe Company as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, 2016, and the results of theiroperations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20152017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting.Reporting and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina

February 25, 2016

81
20, 2018
TableofContentsWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)
          
     December 31,
     2015 2014
Assets     
 Cash and due from banks$ 2,123  $ 1,639 
 Interest-bearing deposits with banks  1,435    529 
 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements or similar     
  arrangements  153    157 
 Restricted cash  456    374 
 AFS securities at fair value  25,297    20,907 
 HTM securities (fair value of $18,519 and $20,313 at December 31, 2015     
   and December 31, 2014, respectively)  18,530    20,240 
 LHFS at fair value  1,035    1,423 
 Loans and leases  135,951    119,884 
 ALLL  (1,460)   (1,474)
  Loans and leases, net of ALLL  134,491    118,410 
          
 Premises and equipment  2,007    1,827 
 Goodwill  8,548    6,869 
 CDI and other intangible assets  686    505 
 Residential MSRs at fair value  880    844 
 Other assets  14,306    13,110 
   Total assets$ 209,947  $ 186,834 
          
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity     
 Deposits:     
  Noninterest-bearing deposits$ 45,695  $ 38,786 
  Interest-bearing deposits  103,429    90,254 
   Total deposits  149,124    129,040 
          
 Short-term borrowings  3,593    3,717 
 Long-term debt  23,769    23,312 
 Accounts payable and other liabilities  6,121    6,388 
   Total liabilities  182,607    162,457 
          
 Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)     
 Shareholders’ equity:     
  Preferred stock, $5 par, liquidation preference of $25,000 per share  2,603    2,603 
  Common stock, $5 par  3,902    3,603 
  Additional paid-in capital  8,365    6,517 
  Retained earnings  13,464    12,317 
  AOCI, net of deferred income taxes  (1,028)   (751)
  Noncontrolling interests  34    88 
   Total shareholders’ equity  27,340    24,377 
   Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$ 209,947  $ 186,834 
          
 Common shares outstanding  780,337    720,698 
 Common shares authorized  2,000,000    2,000,000 
 Preferred shares outstanding  107    107 
 Preferred shares authorized  5,000    5,000 


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
   
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 2017 2016
Assets    
Cash and due from banks $2,243
 $1,897
Interest-bearing deposits with banks 343
 1,895
Cash equivalents 127
 144
Restricted cash 370
 488
AFS securities at fair value 24,547
 26,926
HTM securities (fair value of $22,837 and $16,546 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively) 23,027
 16,680
LHFS at fair value 1,099
 1,716
Loans and leases 143,701
 143,322
ALLL (1,490) (1,489)
Loans and leases, net of ALLL 142,211
 141,833
Premises and equipment 2,055
 2,107
Goodwill 9,618
 9,638
CDI and other intangible assets 711
 854
MSRs at fair value 1,056
 1,052
Other assets 14,235
 14,046
Total assets $221,642
 $219,276
     
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity    
Deposits:    
Noninterest-bearing deposits $53,767
 $50,697
Interest-bearing deposits 103,604
 109,537
Total deposits 157,371
 160,234
Short-term borrowings 4,938
 1,406
Long-term debt 23,648
 21,965
Accounts payable and other liabilities 5,990
 5,745
Total liabilities 191,947
 189,350
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) 
 
Shareholders’ equity:    
Preferred stock, $5 par, liquidation preference of $25,000 per share 3,053
 3,053
Common stock, $5 par 3,910
 4,047
Additional paid-in capital 7,893
 9,104
Retained earnings 16,259
 14,809
AOCI, net of deferred income taxes (1,467) (1,132)
Noncontrolling interests 47
 45
Total shareholders’ equity 29,695
 29,926
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $221,642
 $219,276
     
Common shares outstanding 782,006
 809,475
Common shares authorized 2,000,000
 2,000,000
Preferred shares outstanding 126
 126
Preferred shares authorized 5,000
 5,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

82

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)
 
      Year Ended December 31,
       2015   2014   2013 
Interest Income        
 Interest and fees on loans and leases$ 5,347  $ 5,163  $ 5,603 
 Interest and dividends on securities  941    939    871 
 Interest on other earning assets  39    40    33 
   Total interest income  6,327    6,142    6,507 
Interest Expense        
 Interest on deposits  233    239    301 
 Interest on short-term borrowings  4    4    6 
 Interest on long-term debt  498    525    584 
   Total interest expense  735    768    891 
Net Interest Income  5,592    5,374    5,616 
 Provision for credit losses  428    251    592 
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses  5,164    5,123    5,024 
Noninterest Income        
 Insurance income  1,596    1,643    1,517 
 Service charges on deposits  631    632    619 
 Mortgage banking income  455    395    565 
 Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions  398    387    383 
 Trust and investment advisory revenues  240    221    200 
 Bankcard fees and merchant discounts  218    207    202 
 Checkcard fees  174    163    157 
 Operating lease income  124    95    77 
 Income from bank-owned life insurance  113    110    113 
 FDIC loss share income, net  (253)   (343)   (293)
 Other income  326    349    445 
 Securities gains (losses), net        
   Gross realized gains  41    7    57 
   Gross realized losses  (40)   (4)   (6)
   OTTI charges  (2)   (23)   ―   
   Non-credit portion recognized in OCI  (2)   17    ―   
     Total securities gains (losses), net  (3)   (3)   51 
   Total noninterest income  4,019    3,856    4,036 
Noninterest Expense        
 Personnel expense  3,469    3,180    3,293 
 Occupancy and equipment expense  708    682    692 
 Software expense  192    174    158 
 Loan-related expense  150    267    188 
 Outside IT services  135    115    89 
 Professional services  130    139    189 
 Amortization of intangibles  105    91    106 
 Regulatory charges  101    106    143 
 Foreclosed property expense  53    40    55 
 Merger-related and restructuring charges, net  165    46    46 
 Loss on early extinguishment of debt  172    122    ―   
 Other expense  886    890    818 
   Total noninterest expense  6,266    5,852    5,777 
Earnings        
 Income before income taxes  2,917    3,127    3,283 
 Provision for income taxes  794    921    1,553 
   Net income  2,123    2,206    1,730 
 Noncontrolling interests  39    75    50 
 Dividends on preferred stock  148    148    117 
   Net income available to common shareholders$ 1,936  $ 1,983  $ 1,563 
 Basic EPS$ 2.59  $ 2.76  $ 2.22 
 Diluted EPS$ 2.56  $ 2.72  $ 2.19 
 Cash dividends declared per share$ 1.05  $ 0.95  $ 0.92 
 Basic weighted average shares outstanding  748,010    718,140    703,042 
 Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  757,765    728,372    714,363 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 2017 2016 2015
Interest Income      
Interest and fees on loans and leases $6,230
 $5,985
 $5,347
Interest and dividends on securities 1,092
 1,029
 941
Interest on other earning assets 52
 52
 39
Total interest income 7,374
 7,066
 6,327
Interest Expense      
Interest on deposits 344
 251
 233
Interest on short-term borrowings 41
 9
 4
Interest on long-term debt 454
 485
 498
Total interest expense 839
 745
 735
Net Interest Income 6,535
 6,321
 5,592
Provision for credit losses 547
 572
 428
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses 5,988
 5,749
 5,164
Noninterest Income      
Insurance income 1,754
 1,713
 1,596
Service charges on deposits 706
 664
 631
Mortgage banking income 415
 463
 455
Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions 410
 408
 398
Trust and investment advisory revenues 278
 266
 240
Bankcard fees and merchant discounts 271
 237
 218
Checkcard fees 214
 195
 174
Operating lease income 146
 137
 124
Income from bank-owned life insurance 122
 123
 113
FDIC loss share income, net 
 (142) (253)
Other income 467
 362
 326
Securities gains (losses), net      
Gross realized gains 17
 46
 41
Gross realized losses (18) 
 (40)
OTTI charges 
 
 (2)
Non-credit portion recognized in OCI 
 
 (2)
Total securities gains (losses), net (1) 46
 (3)
Total noninterest income 4,782
 4,472
 4,019
Noninterest Expense      
Personnel expense 4,121
 3,964
 3,469
Occupancy and equipment expense 784
 786
 708
Software expense 242
 224
 192
Outside IT services 160
 186
 135
Regulatory charges 153
 145
 101
Amortization of intangibles 142
 150
 105
Loan-related expense 130
 95
 150
Professional services 123
 102
 130
Merger-related and restructuring charges, net 115
 171
 165
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt 392
 (1) 172
Other expense 1,082
 899
 939
Total noninterest expense 7,444
 6,721
 6,266
Earnings      
Income before income taxes 3,326
 3,500
 2,917
Provision for income taxes 911
 1,058
 794
Net income 2,415
 2,442
 2,123
Noncontrolling interests 21
 16
 39
Dividends on preferred stock 174
 167
 148
Net income available to common shareholders $2,220
 $2,259
 $1,936
Basic EPS $2.78
 $2.81
 $2.59
Diluted EPS $2.74
 $2.77
 $2.56
Cash dividends declared per share $1.26
 $1.15
 $1.05
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 799,217
 804,680
 748,010
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 810,977
 814,916
 757,765

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

83

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
 
      Year Ended December 31,
       2015   2014   2013 
Net Income$ 2,123  $ 2,206  $ 1,730 
OCI, Net of Tax:        
 Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs  (97)   (323)   411 
 Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges  (29)   (56)   175 
 Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities  (186)   194    (640)
 Change in net amounts attributable to the FDIC under loss share agreements  38    28    21 
 Other, net  (3)   (1)   (1)
  Total OCI  (277)   (158)   (34)
  Total comprehensive income$ 1,846  $ 2,048  $ 1,696 
              
              
Income Tax Effect of Items Included in OCI:        
 Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs$ (59) $ (192) $ 252 
 Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges  (18)   (34)   106 
 Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities  (120)   117    (384)
 Change in net amounts attributable to the FDIC under loss share agreements  25    17    14 
 Other, net  3    2    2 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
   
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Net Income $2,415
 $2,442
 $2,123
OCI, Net of Tax:      
Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs (84) (41) (97)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 18
 (9) (29)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities (27) (225) (186)
Change in FDIC's share of unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities 
 169
 38
Other, net 5
 2
 (3)
Total OCI (88) (104) (277)
Total comprehensive income $2,327
 $2,338
 $1,846
       
Income Tax Effect of Items Included in OCI:    
  
Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs $(15) $(20) $(59)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 7
 (4) (18)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities (27) (130) (120)
Change in FDIC 's share of unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities 
 98
 25
Other, net 
 1
 3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

84

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)
                           
     Shares of Common Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings AOCI Noncontrolling Interests Total Shareholders' Equity
Adjusted Balance, January 1, 2013 699,728  $ 2,116  $ 3,499  $ 5,973  $ 10,099  $ (559) $ 65  $ 21,193 
Add (Deduct):                      
 Net income ―      ―      ―      ―      1,680    ―      50    1,730 
 Net change in AOCI ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      (34)   ―      (34)
 Stock transactions:                      
  Issued in connection with equity awards 6,257    ―      31    74    ―      ―      ―      105 
  Shares repurchased in connection                      
   with equity awards (879)   ―      (4)   (23)   ―      ―      ―      (27)
  Issued in connection with dividend                      
   reinvestment plan 656    ―      3    19    ―      ―      ―      22 
  Issued in connection with 401(k) plan 858    ―      4    25    ―      ―      ―      29 
  Issued in connection with preferred stock                      
   offerings ―      487    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      487 
 Cash dividends declared on common stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (647)   ―      ―      (647)
 Cash dividends declared on preferred stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (117)   ―      ―      (117)
 Equity-based compensation expense ―      ―      ―      96    ―      ―      ―      96 
 Other, net ―      ―      ―      8    ―      ―      (65)   (57)
Adjusted Balance, December 31, 2013 706,620  $ 2,603  $ 3,533  $ 6,172  $ 11,015  $ (593) $ 50  $ 22,780 
Add (Deduct):                      
 Net income ―      ―      ―      ―      2,131    ―      75    2,206 
 Net change in AOCI ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      (158)   ―      (158)
 Stock transactions:                      
  Issued in connection with equity awards 15,321    ―      76    233    ―      ―      ―      309 
  Shares repurchased in connection                      
   with equity awards (2,287)   ―      (11)   (74)   ―      ―      ―      (85)
  Excess tax benefits in connection                      
   with equity awards ―      ―      ―      49    ―      ―      ―      49 
  Issued in connection with dividend                      
   reinvestment plan 391    ―      2    13    ―      ―      ―      15 
  Issued in connection with 401(k) plan 653    ―      3    22    ―      ―      ―      25 
 Cash dividends declared on common stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (681)   ―      ―      (681)
 Cash dividends declared on preferred stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (148)   ―      ―      (148)
 Equity-based compensation expense ―      ―      ―      102    ―      ―      ―      102 
 Other, net ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      (37)   (37)
Adjusted Balance, December 31, 2014 720,698  $ 2,603  $ 3,603  $ 6,517  $ 12,317  $ (751) $ 88  $ 24,377 
Add (Deduct):                      
 Net income ―      ―      ―      ―      2,084    ―      39    2,123 
 Net change in AOCI ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      (277)   ―      (277)
 Stock transactions:                      
  Issued in acquisitions 54,000    ―      270    1,918    ―      ―      ―      2,188 
  Issued in connection with equity awards 6,995    ―      35    79    ―      ―      ―      114 
  Shares repurchased in connection                      
   with equity awards (1,356)   ―      (6)   (46)   ―      ―      ―      (52)
  Excess tax benefits in connection                      
   with equity awards ―      ―      ―      11    ―      ―      ―      11 
 Purchase of additional ownership interest in                      
  AmRisc, LP ―      ―      ―      (219)   ―      ―      (3)   (222)
 Cash dividends declared on common stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (789)   ―      ―      (789)
 Cash dividends declared on preferred stock ―      ―      ―      ―      (148)   ―      ―      (148)
 Equity-based compensation expense ―      ―      ―      106    ―      ―      ―      106 
 Other, net ―      ―      ―      (1)   ―      ―      (90)   (91)
Balance, December 31, 2015 780,337  $ 2,603  $ 3,902  $ 8,365  $ 13,464  $ (1,028) $ 34  $ 27,340 


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 
(Dollars in millions, shares in thousands) Shares of Common Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings AOCI Noncontrolling Interests Total Shareholders' Equity
Balance, January 1, 2015 720,698
 $2,603
 $3,603
 $6,517
 $12,317
 $(751) $88
 $24,377
Add (Deduct):                
Net income 
 
 
 
 2,084
 
 39
 2,123
OCI 
 
 
 
 
 (277) 
 (277)
Stock transactions:    
  
          
Issued in business combinations 54,000
 
 270
 1,918
 
 
 
 2,188
Issued in connection with equity awards, net 5,639
 
 29
 33
 
 
 
 62
Excess tax benefits in connection with equity awards 
 
 
 11
 
 
 
 11
Purchase of additional ownership interest in AmRisc, LP 
 
 
 (219) 
 
 (3) (222)
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 (789) 
 
 (789)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock 
 
 
 
 (148) 
 
 (148)
Equity-based compensation expense 
 
 
 106
 
 
 
 106
Other, net 
 
 
 (1) 
 
 (90) (91)
Balance, December 31, 2015 780,337
 2,603
 3,902
 8,365
 13,464
 (1,028) 34
 27,340
Add (Deduct):                
Net income 
 
 
 
 2,426
 
 16
 2,442
OCI 
 
 
 
 
 (104) 
 (104)
Stock transactions:    
  
          
Issued in business combination 31,665
 
 158
 905
 
 
 
 1,063
Issued in connection with equity awards, net 9,241
 
 46
 174
 
 
 
 220
Excess tax benefits in connection with equity awards 
 
 
 7
 
 
 
 7
Issued in connection with preferred stock offering 
 450
 
 
 
 
 
 450
Repurchase of common stock (11,768) 
 (59) (461) 
 
 
 (520)
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 (925) 
 
 (925)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock 
 
 
 
 (167) 
 
 (167)
Equity-based compensation expense 
 
 
 115
 
 
 
 115
Other, net 
 
 
 (1) 11
 
 (5) 5
Balance, December 31, 2016 809,475
 3,053
 4,047
 9,104
 14,809
 (1,132) 45
 29,926
Add (Deduct):                
Net income 
 
 
 
 2,394
 
 21
 2,415
OCI 
 
 
 
 
 (88) 
 (88)
Stock transactions:                
Issued in connection with equity awards, net 8,059
 
 41
 79
 
 
 
 120
Repurchase of common stock (35,528) 
 (178) (1,435) 
 
 
 (1,613)
Cash dividends declared on common stock 
 
 
 
 (1,005) 
 
 (1,005)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock 
 
 
 
 (174) 
 
 (174)
Equity-based compensation expense 
 
 
 132
 
 
 
 132
Reclassification of certain tax effects 
 
 
 
 247
 (247) 
 
Other, net 
 
 
 13
 (12) 
 (19) (18)
Balance, December 31, 2017 782,006
 $3,053
 $3,910
 $7,893
 $16,259
 $(1,467) $47
 $29,695

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

85

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
 
       Year Ended December 31,
       2015 2014 2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:        
 Net income$ 2,123  $ 2,206  $ 1,730 
 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:        
   Provision for credit losses  428    251    592 
   Adjustment to income tax provision  (107)   (39)   516 
   Depreciation  356    333    315 
   Loss on early extinguishment of debt  172    122    ―   
   Amortization of intangibles  105    91    106 
   Deferred tax expense  110    134    307 
   Equity-based compensation  106    102    96 
   (Gain) loss on securities, net  3    3    (51)
   Net change in operating assets and liabilities:        
      LHFS  422    (201)   2,445 
      Trading securities  (698)   (101)   116 
      Other assets  (493)   346    (75)
      Accounts payable and other liabilities  263    (4)   (812)
   Other, net  125    (33)   23 
      Net cash from operating activities  2,915    3,210    5,308 
               
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
 Proceeds from sales of AFS securities  6,302    1,309    2,209 
 Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of AFS securities  5,064    3,915    6,214 
 Purchases of AFS securities  (12,698)   (3,685)   (6,463)
 Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities  3,791    1,866    2,863 
 Purchases of HTM securities  (2,557)   (4,030)   (7,399)
 Originations and purchases of loans and leases, net of principal collected  (2,984)   (5,041)   (3,077)
 Net cash from acquisitions and divestitures  1,055    1,025    516 
 Proceeds from sales of foreclosed property  218    239    394 
 Other, net  171    387    534 
   Net cash from investing activities  (1,638)   (4,015)   (4,209)
               
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
 Net change in deposits  2,506    337    (5,600)
 Net change in short-term borrowings  (982)   (421)   1,274 
 Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt  2,272    5,510    4,164 
 Repayment of long-term debt  (2,433)   (3,912)   (1,634)
 Net proceeds from preferred stock issued  ―      ―      487 
 Cash dividends paid on common stock  (789)   (666)   (765)
 Cash dividends paid on preferred stock  (148)   (148)   (147)
 Other, net  (317)   265    248 
   Net cash from financing activities  109    965    (1,973)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents  1,386    160    (874)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period  2,325    2,165    3,039 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$ 3,711  $ 2,325  $ 2,165 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:        
 Cash paid during the period for:        
   Interest$ 734  $ 765  $ 918 
   Income taxes  655    322    677 
 Noncash investing and financing activities:        
   Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets  532    547    609 
   Transfers of loans HFI to LHFS  43    684    ―   
   Stock issued in acquisitions  2,188    ―      ―   
   Purchase of additional interest in AmRisc, LP  216    ―      ―   
   Transfer of HTM securities to AFS  517    ―      ―   


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:      
Net income $2,415
 $2,442
 $2,123
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:      
Provision for credit losses 547
 572
 428
Depreciation 408
 405
 356
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt 392
 (1) 172
Amortization of intangibles 142
 150
 105
Equity-based compensation expense 132
 115
 106
(Gain) loss on securities, net 1
 (46) 3
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:      
LHFS 618
 (644) 422
Trading securities 115
 432
 (698)
Other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities (15) (18) (14)
Cash paid to terminate FDIC loss share agreements 
 (230) 
Other, net (120) (62) 128
Net cash from operating activities 4,635
 3,115
 3,131
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:      
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities 4,934
 4,612
 6,302
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of AFS securities 4,800
 5,888
 5,064
Purchases of AFS securities (7,397) (10,033) (12,698)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities 2,580
 7,022
 3,791
Purchases of HTM securities (8,965) (5,124) (2,557)
Originations and purchases of loans and leases, net of principal collected (1,230) (2,986) (3,196)
Net cash received (paid) for acquisitions and divestitures 
 (785) 1,055
Other, net (31) 398
 390
Net cash from investing activities (5,309) (1,008) (1,849)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:      
Net change in deposits (2,842) 4,507
 2,506
Net change in short-term borrowings 3,532
 (3,581) (982)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 8,883
 3,878
 2,272
Repayment of long-term debt (7,453) (5,849) (2,433)
Repurchase of common stock (1,613) (520) 
Net cash from common stock transactions in connection with equity awards 108
 218
 68
Net proceeds from preferred stock issued 
 450
 
Cash dividends paid on common stock (1,005) (925) (789)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock (174) (167) (148)
Other, net 15
 107
 (390)
Net cash from financing activities (549) (1,882) 104
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents (1,223) 225
 1,386
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 3,936
 3,711
 2,325
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $2,713
 $3,936
 $3,711
       
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:      
Cash paid during the period for:      
Interest $819
 $775
 $734
Income taxes 429
 844
 655
Noncash investing and financing activities:      
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets 260
 258
 320
Transfers of loans HFI to LHFS 1,050
 263
 153
Stock issued in acquisitions 
 1,063
 2,188
Purchase of additional interest in AmRisc, LP 
 
 216
Transfer of HTM securities to AFS 
 
 517

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

86


NOTE 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

General

See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this Report for terms used throughout the consolidated financial statements and related notes of this Form 10-K.

herein. The accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. The following is a summary of the more significant accounting policies.

Nature of Operations

BB&T is a FHC organized under the laws of North Carolina. BB&T conducts operations through a bank subsidiary, Branch Bank, and nonbank subsidiaries. Branch Bank’s offices are concentrated primarily in the southeasternSoutheastern and mid-AtlanticMid-Atlantic United States. BB&T provides a wide range of banking services to individuals, businesses and municipalities. BB&T offers a variety of loans and lease financing to individuals and entities primarily within BB&T’s geographic footprint, including insurance premium financing;commercial and residential mortgages; permanent CRE financing arrangements; loan servicing for third-party investors; direct consumer finance loans to individuals; credit card lending; automobile financing; factoring and equipment financing. BB&T also marketsprovides a wide range of other services, including deposits; discount and full service brokerage, annuities and mutual funds; life insurance, property and casualty insurance, health insurance and commercial general liability insurance on anthrough its retail agency basis and through a wholesale insurance brokerage operation;operations; merchant services; trust and retirement services; comprehensive wealth advisory services; asset management and capital markets services.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BB&T Corporation and those subsidiaries that are majority owned by BB&T or over which BB&T exercises control. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations of companies or assets acquired are included from the dates of acquisition. All material wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries are consolidated unless GAAP requires otherwise.

BB&T holds investments in certain legal entities that are considered VIEs. VIEs are legal entities in which equity investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to independently finance its activities, or as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact its economic performance, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity. Consolidation of a VIE is required if a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

Investments in VIEs are evaluated to determine if BB&T is the primary beneficiary. This evaluation gives appropriate consideration to the design of the entity and the variability that the entity was designed to pass along, the relative power of each party, and to BB&T’s relative obligation to absorb losses or receive residual returns of the entity, in relation to such obligations and rights held by each party. During 2015, BB&T disposed of its variable interests in its Tender Option Bond program trusts, which allowed for tax-advantaged financing of certain debt instruments issued by tax-exempt entities. BB&T was considered the primary beneficiary of the Tender Option Bond program trusts, resulting in the consolidation of their assets and liabilities in prior years. BB&T also has variable interests in certain entities that were not required to be consolidated, including affordable housing partnership interests, historic tax credit partnerships and other partnership interests. Refer to Note 14 “Commitments"Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies”Contingencies" for additional disclosures regarding BB&T’s significant VIEs.

BB&T accounts for unconsolidated partnerships and similarcertain other investments using the equity method of accounting. BB&T records its portion of income or loss in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. These investments are periodically evaluated for impairment. BB&T also has investments in, and future funding commitments to, private equity investments, which are accounted for based on BB&T’s ownership and control rights specific to each investment.

Reclassifications

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been revised to correct errors in the classification of certain transactions related to other assets and other liabilities and were not material to prior consolidated financial statements. The net effect of the revisions is as follows:
(dollars in millions) 2016 2015
Net cash from operating activities $443
 $216
Net cash from investing activities (326) (211)
Net cash from financing activities (117) (5)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents $
 $

Certain other amounts reported in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported cash flows, shareholders’ equity or net income.

87

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the ACL, determination of fair value for financial instruments, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other purchase accounting related adjustments, benefit plan obligations and expenses, mortgage servicing rights, and tax assets, liabilities and expense.

Business Combinations

BB&T accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The accounts of an acquired entity are included as of the date of acquisition, and any excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is capitalized as goodwill.

BB&T typically issues common stock and/or pays cash for an acquisition, depending on the terms of the acquisition agreement. The value of common shares issued is determined based on the market price of the stock as of the closing of the acquisition.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks, and Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements or similar arrangements.other cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents have maturities of three months or less. Accordingly, the carrying amount of such instruments is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily represents amounts posted as collateral for derivatives in a loss position.

Securities

BB&T classifies marketable

Marketable investment securities are classified as HTM, AFS or trading. Interest income and dividends on securities are recognized in income on an accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized as an adjustment to interest income using the effective interest method.

 For MBS, prepayment speeds are evaluated quarterly in order to determine the estimated lives of the securities. When the estimated lives of MBS are changed, the amortization of premiums or discounts is adjusted with a corresponding charge or credit to interest income as if the current estimated lives had been applied since the acquisition of the securities.


Debt securities are classified as HTM wherewhen BB&T has both the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. These securities are reported at amortized cost.

Debt securities whichthat may be sold to meet liquidity needs arising from unanticipated deposit and loan fluctuations, changes in regulatory capital requirements or unforeseen changes in market conditions are classified as AFS. AFS securities are reported at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in AOCI, net of deferred income taxes, in the shareholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Gains or losses realized from the sale of AFS securities are determined by specific identification and are included in noninterest income.

Each HTM and AFS security in a loss position is evaluated for OTTI. BB&T considers such factors as the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below amortized cost, long term expectations and recent experience regarding principal and interest payments, BB&T’s intent to sell and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell those securities before the anticipated recovery of the amortized cost basis. The credit component of an OTTI loss is recognized in earnings and the non-credit component is recognized in AOCI in situations where BB&T does not intend to sell the security and it is more-likely-than-not that BB&T will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Subsequent to recognition of OTTI, an increase in expected cash flows is recognized as a yield adjustment over the remaining expected life of the security based on an evaluation of the nature of the increase.

Trading account securities, which include both debt and equity securities, are reported at fair value and included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unrealized fair value adjustments, fees, and realized gains or losses from trading account activities (determined by specific identification) are included in noninterest income. Interest income on trading account securities is included in interest on other earning assets.

88


LHFS

BB&T accounts for new originations of prime residential and commercial mortgage LHFS at fair value. BB&T accounts for the derivatives used to economically hedge the LHFS at fair value. The fair value of LHFS is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities collateralized by similar types of loans. Direct loan origination fees and costs related to LHFS are not capitalized, and are recorded as mortgage banking income in the case of the direct loan origination fees and primarily personnel expense in the case of the direct loan origination costs. Gains and losses on sales of residential and commercial mortgage loans are included in mortgage banking income. Gains and losses on sales of commercial LHFS are included in other noninterest income.

BB&T sells a significant portion of its fixed-rate commercial and conforming residential mortgage loan originations, which are typically converted into MBS by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA and subsequently sold to other third party investors. BB&T records these transactions as a sale when the transferred loans are legally isolated from BB&T’s creditors and the other accounting criteria for a sale are met. Gains or losses recorded on these transactions are based in part on the net carrying amount of the loans sold which is allocated betweenand the loans sold and retained interests based on their relative fair values at the datevalue of sale.related mortgage servicing, which BB&T generally retains the mortgage servicing on loans sold. Since quoted market prices are not typically available, BB&T estimates the fair value of these retained interests using modeling techniques to determine the net present value of expected future cash flows. Such models incorporate management’s best estimates of key variables, such as prepayment speeds, servicing costs and discount rates that would be used by market participants based on the risks involved.

Gains on residential mortgage loan sales, including marking LHFS to fair value and the impact of interest rate lock commitments, are recorded in noninterest income as a component of mortgage banking income. For certain of these transactions, the loan servicing rights were retained, including the related MSRs and on-going servicing fees.

BB&T also issues standard representations and warranties related to mortgage loan sales to GSEs. Although these agreements often do not specify limitations, management does not believe that any payments related to these warranties would materially change the financial condition or results of operations of BB&T.

Loans and Leases

The Company’s accounting methods for loans differ depending on whether the loans are originated or purchased, and if purchased, whether or not the loans reflect credit deterioration since the date of origination such that it is probable at the date of acquisition that BB&T will be unable to collect all contractually required payments.

Originated Loans and Leases

Loans and leases that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, and unamortized fees and costs. The net amount of nonrefundable loan origination fees and certain direct costs associated with the lending process are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual lives of the loans using methods that approximate the effective interest method.

BB&T classifies loans and leases as past due when the payment of principal and interest based upon contractual terms is greater than 30 days delinquent or if one payment is past due. When commercial loans are placed on nonaccrual status as described below, a charge-off is recorded, as applicable, to decrease the carrying value of such loans to the estimated recoverable amount. Retail loans are subject to mandatory charge-off at a specified delinquency date consistent with regulatory guidelines. As such, retail loans are subject to collateral valuation and charge-off, as applicable, when they are moved to nonaccrual status as described below.

Purchased Loans

Purchased loans are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an ALLL is not recorded at the acquisition date.

89

Purchased loans are evaluated upon acquisition and classified as either purchased impaired or purchased non-impaired. Purchased impairedPCI loans reflect credit deterioration since origination such that it is probable at acquisition that BB&T will be unable to collect all contractually required payments. For purchased impairedPCI loans, expected cash flows at the acquisition date in excess of the fair value of loans are recorded as interest income over the life of the loans using a level yield method if the timing and amount of the future cash flows is reasonably estimable. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized prospectively as interest income. Decreases in expected cash flows due to credit deterioration are recognized by recording an ALLL. For purchased non-impaired loans, the difference between the fair value and UPB of the loan at the acquisition date is amortized or accreted to interest income over the estimatedcontractual life of the loans using the effective interest method.

In the event of prepayment, the remaining unamortized amount is recognized in interest income.

TDRs

Modifications to a borrower’s debt agreement are considered TDRs if a concession is granted for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties that otherwise would not be considered. TDRs are undertaken in order to improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan and may take the form of modifications made with the stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, other modifications to the structure of the loan that fall outside of normal underwriting policies and procedures, or in certain limited circumstances forgiveness of principal or interest. Modifications of PCI loans acquired from the FDIC that are part of a pool accounted for as a single asset are not considered TDRs. TDRs can involve loans remaining on nonaccrual, moving to nonaccrual, or continuing on accruing status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. In circumstances where the TDR involves charging off a portion of the loan balance, BB&T typically classifies these TDRs as nonaccrual.


In connection with commercial TDRs, the decision to maintain a loan that has been restructured on accrual status is based on a current, well documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment under the modified terms. This evaluation includes consideration of the borrower’s current capacity to pay, which among other things may include a review of the borrower’s current financial statements, an analysis of cash flow available to pay debt obligations, and an evaluation of secondary sources of payment from the clientborrower and any guarantors. This evaluation also includes an evaluation of the borrower’s current willingness to pay, which may include a review of past payment history, an evaluation of the borrower’s willingness to provide information on a timely basis, and consideration of offers from the borrower to provide additional collateral or guarantor support. The credit evaluation may also include review of cash flow projections, consideration of the adequacy of collateral to cover all principal and interest and trends indicating improving profitability and collectability of receivables.

The evaluation of mortgage and retail loans includes an evaluation of the client’s debt to income ratio, credit report, property value, loan vintage, and certain other client-specific factors that impact their ability to make timely principal and interest payments on the loan.

Nonaccrual commercial TDRs may be returned to accrual status based on a current, well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment under the modified terms. This evaluation must include consideration of the borrower’s sustained historical repayment performance for a reasonable period (generally a minimum of six months) prior to the date on which the loan is returned to accrual status. Sustained historical repayment performance for a reasonable time prior to the TDR may be taken into account. In connection with retail TDRs, a NPL will be returned to accruing status when current as to principal and interest and upon a sustained historical repayment performance (generally a minimum of six months).

TDR classification may be removed for aan accruing loan upon the occurrence of a non-concessionary subsequent modification that isgranted at market terms and within current underwriting guidelines.

NPAs

NPAs include NPLs and foreclosed property. Foreclosed property consists of real estate and other assets acquired as a result of customers’ loan defaults.

BB&T’s policies for placing loans on nonaccrual status conform to guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. The majority of commercialBB&T classifies loans and leases are placed on nonaccrual status when it is probable that principal or interest is not fully collectible, or generally when principal or interest becomes 90 daysas past due whichever occurs first. Other lending subsidiaries’ loans, which includes both retail and commercial loans, are placed on nonaccrual status generally when the payment of principal and interest becomes 90based upon contractual terms is greater than 30 days delinquent or if one payment is past due. Direct retail, mortgageThe following table summarizes the delinquency thresholds that are used in evaluating nonaccrual classification and sales finance loans are placed on nonaccrual status at varying intervals, based on the typetiming of product, generally when principal and interest becomes between 90 days and 120 days past due. PCIcharge-offs (PCI loans are considered to be performing due to the application of the expected cash flows method.

method):
(number of days) Placed on Nonaccrual (1) Charge-off
Commercial:        
Commercial and industrial 90(2)  90  
CRE 90(2)  90  
Lease financing 90(2)  90  
Retail:        
Residential mortgage (3) 90to180 90to210
Direct (3) 90to120 90to120
Indirect (3) 90to120 90to120
Revolving credit (3) NA   90to180
90
(1)Loans may be returned to accrual status when they become current as to both principal and interest and concern no longer exists as to the collectability of principal and interest, generally indicated by 180 days of sustained performance.
(2)Or when it is probable that principal or interest is not fully collectible, whichever occurs first.
(3)Depends on product type, loss mitigation status and status of the government guaranty.

Residential mortgage NPLs secured by 1-4 family propertiesWhen commercial loans are generally charged downplaced on nonaccrual status, a charge-off is recorded, as applicable, to the fair value of the collateral securing the loan less costs to sell upon becoming 120 days past due, unless the shortfall is covered by private mortgage insurance. Nonperforming residential mortgage TDRs generally incur charge-offs at 120 days. If a known loss is identified prior to these time periods, the applicable charge-off occurs immediately. BB&T recognizes charge-offs on government guaranteed NPLs to the extent thatdecrease the carrying value of the NPL exceeds the guaranteed amount.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, BB&T implemented a residential mortgage and direct retail lending policy change to movesuch loans to nonaccrual statusthe estimated recoverable amount. Retail loans are subject to mandatory charge-off at 120 days past due instead of 180 days.

Charge-offs are recorded on revolving credit loans after they become 180 days past due and commercial bank card balances after they become 90 days past due. Unpaid fees and finance charges are reversed against interest income in the period in which the charge-off occurs. Othera specified delinquency date consistent with regulatory guidelines. As such, retail loans not secured by 1-4 family properties are charged downsubject to the fair value of the collateral securing the loan less costsvaluation and charge-off, as applicable, when they are moved to sell upon becoming between 90 and 120 days past due, depending on the type of loan.

Secured retail loans discharged through bankruptcy are charged down to the fair value of the related collateral, and the remaining balance is placed on nonaccrual status.

Certain past due loans may remain on accrual status if management determines that it does not have concern over the collectability of principal and interest. Generally, when loans are placed on nonaccrual status, accrued interest receivable is reversed against interest income in the current period. Interest paymentsperiod and amortization of deferred loan fees and expenses is suspended. Payments received for interest and lending fees thereafter are applied as a reduction to the remaining principal balance as long as concern exists as to the ultimate collection of the principal. Nonaccrual mortgage loans are accounted for using the cash basis. Loans and leases are generally removed from nonaccrual status when they become current as to both principal and interest and concern no longer exists as to the collectability of principal and interest.

Assets acquired as a result of foreclosure are subsequently carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value equals fair value less estimated selling costs. Any excess of cost over net realizable value at the time of foreclosure is charged to the ALLL. NPAs are subject to periodic revaluations of the collateral underlying impaired loans and foreclosed real estate. The periodic revaluations are generally based on the appraised value of the property and may include additional liquidity adjustments based upon the expected retention period. BB&T’s policies require that valuations be updated at least annually and that upon foreclosure, the valuation must not be more than six months old, otherwise an updated appraisalupdate is required. Routine maintenance costs, other costs of ownership, subsequent declines in fair value and net losses on disposal are included in foreclosed property expense.


ACL

The ACL includes the ALLL and the RUFC. The ACL represents management’s best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolios and off-balance sheet lending commitments at the balance sheet date. Estimates for loan and lease losses are determined by analyzing historical loan and lease losses, historical loan and lease migration to charge-off experience, current trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, expected cash flows on purchasedPCI loans, current assessment of problemimpaired loans and leases, the results of regulatory examinations and changes in the size, composition and risk assessment of the loan and lease portfolio. As part of this process, BB&T develops a series of loss estimate factors, which are modeled projections of the frequency, timing and severity of losses. Changes to the ACL are made by charges to the provision for credit losses, which is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Loan or lease balances deemed to be uncollectible are charged off against the ALLL. Recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the ALLL. The methodology used to determine the RUFC is inherently similar to that used to determine the collectively evaluated component of the ALLL, adjusted for factors specific to binding commitments, including the probability of funding and exposure at default. While management uses the best information available to establish the ACL, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in computing the ACL or, if required by regulators based upon information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Accounting standards require the presentationdisclosure of certain disclosure information at the portfolio segment level, which representsrepresenting the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine its ACL. BB&T concluded that its loan and lease portfolio consists of threefour portfolio segments; commercial, retail, revolving credit, and PCI. The commercial portfolio segment includes CRE, commercial and industrial and other loans originated by certain other lending subsidiaries, and was identified based on the risk-based approach used to estimate the ALLL for the vast majority of these loans. The retail portfolio segment includes direct retail lending, revolving credit, residential mortgage, sales finance and other loans originated by certain retail-oriented subsidiaries, and was identified based on the delinquency-based approach used to estimate the ALLL. The revolving credit portfolio segment, which also uses a delinquency-based ALLL approach, was identified because of the uniqueness of its lending arrangements. The PCI portfolio segment was identified based on the expected cash flows approach used to estimate the ALLL.

91
During the fourth quarter of 2017, certain loan categories were reclassified to better reflect the nature of the underlying loans. Prior periods were revised to conform to the current presentation. See "Note 3. Loans and ACL" for additional information about the classes of financing receivables included within each of these loan portfolio segments.

The entire amount of the ACL is available to absorb losses on any loan category or lending-related commitment.

The following provides a description of accounting policies and methodologies related to each of the portfolio segments:

Commercial

The vast majority of loans in the commercial lending portfolio are assigned risk ratings based on an assessment of conditions that affect the borrower’s ability to meet contractual obligations under the loan agreement. This process includes reviewing borrowers’ financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and other information specific to each borrower. Risk ratings are reviewed on an annual basis for all credit relationships with total credit exposure of $1more than $2 million, or more, or at any point management becomes aware of information affecting the borrowers’ ability to fulfill their obligations.

Risk Rating Description
Pass Loans not considered to be problem credits
Special Mention Loans that have a potential weakness deserving management’s close attention
Substandard Loans for which a well-defined weakness has been identified that may put full collection of contractual cash flows at risk

For commercial clients with total credit exposure of $2 million or less, than $1 million, BB&T has developed an automated loan review system to identify and proactively manage accounts with a higher risk of loss. The “score”"score" produced by this automated system is updated monthly.

During 2013, toquarterly.

To establish a reserve, BB&T’s&T's policy wasis to review all commercial lending relationships with outstanding debt of $5 million or more that were classified as substandard. During the first quarter of 2014, this process was revised such that any obligor with an outstanding nonaccrual balance of $3 million or more is reviewed.more. While this review is largely focused on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, BB&T also considers the capacity and willingness of a loan’s guarantors to support the debt service on the loan as a secondary source of repayment. When a guarantor exhibits the documented capacity and willingness to support the loan, BB&T may consider extending the loan maturity and/or temporarily deferring principal payments if the ultimate collection of both principal and interest is not in question. In these cases, BB&T may deem the loan to not be impaired due to the documented capacity and willingness of the guarantor to repay the loan. Loans are considered impaired when the borrower (or guarantor in certain circumstances) does not have the cash flow capacity or willingness to service the debt according to contractual terms, or it does not appear reasonable to assume that the borrower will continue to pay according to the contractual agreement. BB&T establishes a specific reserve for each loan that has been deemed impaired based on the criteria outlined above. The amount of the reserve is based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate and/or the value of collateral, net of costs to sell. In addition, beginning with the first quarter of 2014, BB&T reviews any collateral-dependent commercial loan balances between $1 million and $3 million to establish a specific reserve based on the underlying collateral value, net of costs to sell.


BB&T also has a review process related to TDRs and other commercial impaired loans. In connection with this process, BB&T establishes reserves related to these loans that are calculated using an expected cash flow approach. These discounted cash flow analyses incorporate adjustments to future cash flows that reflect management’s best estimate of the default risk related to TDRs based on a combination of historical experience and management judgment.

BB&T also maintains reserves for collective impairment that reflect an estimate of losses related to non-impaired commercial loans as of the balance sheet date. Embedded loss estimates for BB&T’s commercial loan portfolio are based on estimated migration rates, which are based on historical experience, and current risk mix as indicated by the risk grading or scoring process described above. Embedded loss estimates may be adjusted to reflect current economic conditions and current portfolio trends including credit quality, concentrations, aging of the portfolio, and significant policy and underwriting changes.

92

Retail

and Revolving Credit


The majority of the ALLL related to the retail and revolving credit lending portfolioportfolios is calculated on a collective basis using delinquency status, which is the primary factor considered in determining whether a retail loan should be classified as nonaccrual. Embedded loss estimates for BB&T’s retail and revolving credit lending portfolioportfolios are based on estimated migration rates that are developed based on historical experience, and current risk mix as indicated by prevailing delinquency rates. These estimates may be adjusted to reflect current economic conditions and current portfolio trends. The remaining portion of the ALLL related to the retail and revolving credit lending portfolioportfolios relates to loans that have been deemed impaired based on their classification as a TDR at the balance sheet date. BB&T establishes specific reserves related to these TDRs using an expected cash flow approach. The ALLL for retail and revolving credit TDRs is based on discounted cash flow analyses that incorporate adjustments to future cash flows that reflect management’s best estimate of the default risk related to TDRs based on a combination of historical experience and management judgment.


PCI

PCI loans (including all loans acquired in an FDIC-assisted transaction) are aggregated into loan pools based upon common risk characteristics. The ALLL for each loan pool is based on an analysis that is performed each period to estimate the expected cash flows. To the extent that the expected cash flows of a loan pool have decreased due to credit deterioration, BB&T establishes an ALLL.

Assets Acquired from the FDIC and Related FDIC Loss Share Receivable/Payable

Certain loans, securities and other assets were acquired from the FDIC in connection with the Colonial transaction and are divided between two loss sharing agreements, the single family loss share agreement and the commercial loss share agreement. The single family loss share agreement expires in 2019. Assets subject to the single family loss share agreement have loss and recovery sharing with the FDIC and are referred to as “covered” assets.

Effective October 1, 2014, the loss sharing provisions related to the commercial loss share agreement expired; however, Branch Bank must reimburse the FDIC for realized gains and recoveries through September 2017. Refer to Note 3 “Securities” and Note 4 “Loans and ACL” for additional information. The FDIC loss share receivable includes amounts related to net reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC and is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recognized amounts related to expected future payments to the FDIC, including any amounts resulting from the aggregate loss calculation, are included in Accounts payable and other liabilities.

The FDIC’s obligation to reimburse Branch Bank with respect to loss sharing agreements began with the first dollar of loss incurred by BB&T on the covered assets. Covered assets, excluding certain non-agency MBS, are subject to a stated threshold of $5 billion that provides for the FDIC to reimburse Branch Bank for (1) 80% of cumulative net losses incurred up to $5 billion and (2) 95% of net losses in excess of $5 billion. Gains and recoveries on covered assets will offset losses, or be paid to the FDIC, at the applicable loss share percentage in effect at the time of gain/recovery. Losses and gains on certain non-agency MBS are to be shared with the FDIC at 95% of such losses/gains. At the conclusion of the loss share period in 2019, should actual aggregate losses, excluding securities, be less than an amount determined in accordance with these agreements, BB&T will pay the FDIC a portion of the difference.

The income statement effect of the changes in the FDIC loss share receivable/payable includes the accretion due to discounting and changes in expected net reimbursements. Decreases in expected net reimbursements, including the amounts expected to be paid to the FDIC as a result of the aggregate loss calculation, are recognized in income prospectively over the term of the loss share agreements consistent with the approach taken to recognize increases in cash flows on acquired loans. Increases in expected reimbursements are recognized in income in the same period that the provision for credit losses for the related loans is recognized. Subsequent to the recognition of ALLL related to specific assets, any decrease in expected net reimbursement would be recognized in income in the same period that the provision for loan losses for the related loans is released.

93

Premises and Equipment

Premises, equipment, capital leases and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Land is stated at cost. In addition, purchased software andCertain costs of computer software acquired or developed for internal use are capitalized provided certain criteria are met. Depreciation and amortization are computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements and capitalized leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the lease terms including certain renewals that were deemed probable at lease inception, or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. Capitalized leases are amortized using the same methods as premises and equipment over the estimated useful lives or lease terms, whichever is less. Obligations under capital leases are amortized using the interest method to allocate payments between principal reduction and interest expense.assets. Rent expense and rental income on operating leases is recorded using the straight-line method over the appropriate lease terms.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

Life insurance policies on certain directors, officers, and employees, for which BB&T is the owner and beneficiary are stated at the cash surrender value within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in cash surrender value and proceeds from insurance benefits are recorded in income from bank-owned life insurance in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes have been provided when different accounting methods have been used in determining income for income tax purposes and for financial reporting purposes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on future tax consequences attributable toresult from differences between the financial statement carrying values of assets and liabilities and theirmeasured for financial reporting purposes compared to income tax bases.return purposes. In the event of changes in the tax laws, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted in the period of the enactment of those changes are enacted, with the cumulative effects included in the current year’s income tax provision. Net deferred tax assets are included in other assets, and net deferred tax liabilities are included in accounts payable and other liabilities, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Interest and penalties related to income taxes are recognized as a component of the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income.


Derivative Financial Instruments

A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced interest rate. These instruments include interest rate swaps, caps, floors, collars, financial forwards and futures contracts, swaptions, when-issued securities, foreign exchange contracts and options written and purchased. BB&T uses derivatives primarily to manage economic risk related to securities, commercial loans, MSRs and mortgage banking operations, long-term debt and other funding sources. BB&T also uses derivatives to facilitate transactions on behalf of its clients. The fair value of derivatives in a gain or loss position is included in other assets or liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral posted for derivative instruments in a loss position is included in restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

BB&T classifies its derivative financial instruments as either (1) a fair value hedge - hedge of an exposure to changes in the fair value of a recorded asset or liability, (“fair value hedge”), (2) a cash flow hedge - hedge of an exposure to changes in the cash flows of a recognized asset, liability or forecasted transaction, (“cash flow hedge”),or (3) a hedge of a net investment in a subsidiary, or (4) derivatives not designated as hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedges are recognized in current period earnings. BB&T has master netting agreements with the derivatives dealers with which it does business, but BB&T presents gross assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

BB&T uses the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness. At inception and at least quarterly over the life of the hedge, BB&T documents its analysis of actual and expected hedge effectiveness. This analysis includes techniques such as regression analysis and hypothetical derivatives to demonstrate that the hedge has been, and is expected to be, highly effective in off-setting corresponding changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. For a qualifying fair value hedge, changes in the value of the derivatives that have been highly effective as hedges are recognized in current period earnings along with the corresponding changes in the fair value of the designated hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. For a qualifying cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivatives that have been highly effective are recognized in OCI until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings.

For either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, ineffectiveness may be recognized to the extent that changes in the value of the derivative instruments do not perfectly offset changes in the value of the hedged items. If the hedge ceases to be highly effective, BB&T discontinues hedge accounting and recognizes the interim changes in fair value in current period earnings. If a derivative that qualifies as a fair value or cash flow hedge is terminated or de-designated, the realized or then unrealized gain or loss iscumulative changes in value are recognized in income over the life of the hedged item (fair value hedge) or in the period in which the hedged item affects earnings (cash flow hedge). Immediate recognition in earnings is required upon sale or extinguishment of the hedged item (fair value hedge) or if it is probable that the hedged cash flows will not occur (cash flow hedge).

94

Derivatives instruments not designated as hedges are primarily used to manage economic risk not designated as hedges primarily represent economic risk management instruments offrom MSRs and mortgage banking operations, with gains or losses included in mortgage banking income. In connection with its mortgage banking activities, BB&T enters into loan commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specified rates and for specified periods of time. To the extent that BB&T’s interest rate lock commitments relate to loans that will be held for sale upon funding, they are also accounted for as derivatives, with gains or losses included in mortgage banking income. Gains and losses on other derivatives used to manage economic risk are primarily associated with client derivative activity and are included in other income.

Credit risk resulting from derivatives arises when amounts receivable from a counterparty exceed those payable to the same counterparty.counterparty, taking into account posted collateral. The risk of loss with respect to over-the-counter derivatives, eligible margin loans and repurchase-style transactions is addressed by subjecting counterparties to a credit review and approval process similar to the process infor making loans or other extensions of credit and/or by requiring collateral.

Derivative dealer counterparties operate under agreements to provide cash and/or highly liquid securities on a daily basis for unsecured credit exposure beyond negotiated limits, while client derivatives that are associated with loans are cross-collateralized with the loan.

BB&T only transacts with dealer counterparties that are national market makers with strong credit standings and requires liquid collateral (cash or government securities) to secure credit exposure. Due to these factors, the fair value of derivatives with dealer counterparties is primarily based on the interest rate mark of each trade. The fair value of interest rate derivatives with clients includes a credit valuation adjustment.

Collateral obtained to secure margin loans includes equities, corporate and municipal securities, and repurchase-style transactions are generally secured by government and agency securities. The value of collateral for margin loans and repurchase-style transactions is monitored daily with settlement required when changes in value exceed established limits by counterparty. Due to the liquid nature of collateral, the frequency of transactions and collateral monitoring, a reserve for credit loss is established only when a risk of loss is identified.


Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the cost in excess of the fair value of net assets acquired (including identifiable intangibles) in transactions accounted for as business acquisitions. BB&T allocates goodwill to the reporting unit(s) that receives significant benefits from the acquisition. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment during the fourth quarteras of October 1st each year and more frequently if circumstances exist that indicate a possible reduction in the fair value of the business below its carrying value. BB&T measures impairment using the present value of estimated future cash flows based upon available information.flows. Discount rates are based upon the cost of capital specific to the industry in which the reporting unit operates. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second analysis is performed to measure the fair value of all assets and liabilities. If, based on the second analysis, it is determined that the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, BB&T would recognize impairment for the excess of carrying value over fair value.

CDI and other intangible assets include premiums paid for acquisitions of core deposits and other identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets other than goodwill, which are determined to have finite lives, are amortized based upon the estimated economic benefits received.

MSRs

BB&T has two primary classes of MSRs for which it separately manages the economic risks: residential and commercial. ResidentialBoth classes of MSRs are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets primarily at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking income.income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Various derivative instruments are used to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions of the residential MSRs. Commercial MSRs are recorded as other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost or market and are amortized in proportion to, and over the estimated period, that net servicing income is expected to be received based on projections of the amount and timing of estimated future net cash flows. The amount and timing of estimated future net cash flows are updated based on actual results and updated projections. BB&T periodically evaluates its commercial MSRs for impairment.

95

Equity-Based Compensation

BB&T maintains various equity-based compensation plans that provide for the granting of stock options (incentive and nonqualified), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, performance units and performance sharesPSUs to selected employees and directors. BB&T values share-based awards at the grant date fair value and recognizes the expense over the requisite service period taking into account retirement eligibility.

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations

BB&T offers various pension plans and postretirement benefit plans to employees. Calculation of the obligations and related expenses under these plans requires the use of actuarial valuation methods and assumptions. The discount rate assumption used to measure the postretirement benefit obligations is set by reference to a high quality corporate bond yield curve and the individual characteristics of the plan such as projected cash flow patterns and payment durations. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is based on the expected returns for each major asset class in which the plan invests, adjusted for the weight of each asset class in the target mix.

Insurance Income

Insurance commission revenue is generally recognized at the later of the billing date or the effective date of the related insurance policies. Insurance premiums
FDIC Loss Share Income, Net
Certain loans, securities and other assets were acquired from underwriting activities are recognized asthe FDIC in connection with the Colonial transaction and were previously subject to loss sharing agreements. During the third quarter of 2016, the loss share agreements were terminated. The accounting for the related assets was unaffected by the termination. The income overstatement effect of the policy term. The portion of premiums that will be earnedchanges in the future is deferredFDIC loss share receivable/payable included the accretion due to discounting and includedchanges in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

expected cash flows.

Segments

Segment results are presented based on internal management accounting policies that were designed to support BB&T’s strategic objectives. The Other, Treasury and Corporate segment includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure. During the fourth quarter of 2017, BB&T restructured its segments to reflect a change in the way management reviews performance and makes decisions. Prior periods have been revised to reflect the restructuring. Refer to Note 20 “Operating Segments”"Note 19. Operating Segments" for additional disclosures regarding BB&T’s segments.

disclosures.


Changes in Accounting Principles and Effects of New Accounting Pronouncements

During February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related toLeases.

Standard/
Adoption Date
DescriptionEffects on the Financial Statements
Standards Adopted During the Current Period
Stock Compensation
Jan 1, 2017
Eliminated the concept of additional paid-in capital pools for equity-based awards and requires that the related excess tax benefits/deficiencies be recognized in earnings. Allows a one-time policy election to account for forfeitures when they occur. Permits tax withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rate to retain equity classification.BB&T has elected the one-time policy to account for forfeitures when they occur. See "Note 11. Income Taxes" for additional information.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects
Dec 31, 2017
Requires a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.Deferred taxes within AOCI of $247 million were reclassified to retained earnings in 2017.
Standards Not Yet Adopted
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Jan 1, 2018
Requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.Does not have a material impact. BB&T will adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective approach.
Derivatives and Hedging
Jan 1, 2019
Expands the risk management activities that qualify for hedge accounting, and simplifies certain hedge documentation and assessment requirements. Eliminates the concept of separately recording hedge ineffectiveness, and expands disclosure requirements.BB&T is currently evaluating the impact. BB&T may elect to adopt this guidance prior to January 1, 2019.
Leases
Jan 1, 2019
Requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities related to certain operating leases on the balance sheet, requires additional disclosures by lessees, and contains targeted changes to accounting by lessors.BB&T expects assets and liabilities will likely be significantly higher. Implementation efforts are on-going, including implementation of software solutions.
Credit Losses
Jan 1, 2020
Replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with an expected credit loss methodology and requires consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an allowance for credit losses. Purchased credit deteriorated loans will receive an allowance for expected credit losses. Any credit impairment on AFS debt securities for which the fair value is less than cost will be recorded through an allowance for expected credit losses.BB&T expects that the ACL could be materially higher; however, the magnitude of the increase and its impact has not yet been quantified and depends on economic conditions at the time of adoption. The standard also requires expanded disclosures related to credit losses and asset quality.

NOTE 2. Securities

The new guidance requires lessees to recognize assetsamortized cost and liabilities related to certain operating leases on the balance sheet. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures by lessees and contains targeted changes to accounting by lessors. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance related toFinancial Instruments. The new guidance requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, excluding equity investments that are consolidated or accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The new guidance allows equity investments without readily determinable fair values to be measured at cost minus impairment, with a qualitative assessment required to identify impairment. The new guidance also requires public companies to use exit prices to measure the fair value of financial instruments, eliminates the disclosure requirements related to measurement assumptions for the fair value of instruments measured at amortized cost and requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities based on form and measurement category. In addition, for liabilities measured at fair value under the fair value option, the changes in fair value due to changes in instrument-specific credit risk should be recognized in OCI. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During September 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toBusiness Combinations. The new guidance requires acquirers to recognize adjustments to provisional amounts (thatsecurities portfolio are identified during the measurement period) in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The new guidance also requires such amounts to be disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. BB&T early adopted this guidance effective September 30, 2015. The adoption of this guidance was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

During May 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toInsurance. The new guidance requires insurance companies to provide additional disclosures about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. BB&T’s insurance operations primarily consist of agency/broker transactions; therefore, the adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

96

During May 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toFair Value Measurement. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to classify in the fair value hierarchy any investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share using the practical expedient. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

During April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toInternal-Use Software. Under the new guidance, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

During April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toDebt Issuance Costs. The new guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

During February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related toConsolidation. The new guidance provides an additional requirement for a limited partnership or similar entity to qualify as a voting interest entity, amending the criteria for consolidating such an entity and eliminating the deferral provided under previous guidance for investment companies. In addition, the new guidance amends the criteria for evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or service provider as a variable interest and amends the criteria for evaluating the effect of fee arrangements and related parties on a VIE primary beneficiary determination. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.

During May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related toRevenue from Contracts with Customers. This guidance supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605,Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Accounting Standards Codification. The guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. During August 2015, the FASB provided a one-year deferral of the effective date; therefore, the guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted new guidance related toReceivables. The new guidance requires that a government guaranteed mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if certain conditions are met. The adoption of this guidance was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted new guidance related toRepurchase-to-Maturity Transactions and Repurchase Financings. The new guidance changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. The guidance also requires separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which results in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The adoption of this guidance was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted new guidance related toInvestments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.The Company used the retrospective method of adoption and has elected the proportional amortization method to account for these investments. The proportional amortization method allows an entity to amortize the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the amount of tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognize the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of the provision for income taxes. For prior periods, amortization expense related to qualifying investments in low income housing tax credits was reclassified from other income to provision for income taxes, and the amount of amortization and tax benefits recognized was revised as a result of the adoption of the proportional amortization method. See Note 14 “Commitments and Contingencies” for the impact of the adoption of this guidance.

97
following tables:
TableofContents

NOTE 2. Acquisitions and Divestitures

Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc.

On August 1, 2015, BB&T acquired all of the outstanding stock of Susquehanna, a FHC organized in 1982 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Susquehanna conducted its business operations primarily through its commercial bank subsidiary, Susquehanna Bank, which was merged into Branch Bank. Susquehanna also operated other subsidiaries in the mid-Atlantic region to provide a wide range of retail and commercial banking and financial products and services. In addition to Susquehanna Bank, Susquehanna operated a trust and investment company, an asset management company, an investment advisory and brokerage firm, a property and casualty insurance brokerage company and a vehicle leasing company. Susquehanna had 245 banking offices in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New Jersey and West Virginia. BB&T acquired Susquehanna in order to increase BB&T’s market share in these areas.

The acquisition of Susquehanna constituted a business combination. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are presented at their fair values in the table below. The determination of fair value requires management to make estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information becomes available. Immaterial amounts of the intangible assets recognized are deductible for income tax purposes.

      Susquehanna 
  UPB Fair Value 
            
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets acquired:      
  Cash, due from banks and federal funds sold   $ 304  
  Securities     2,592  
  Loans and leases:      
   Commercial and industrial$ 4,039    3,876  
   CRE-income producing properties  2,137    2,062  
   CRE-construction and development  842    804  
   Dealer floor plan  31    31  
   Commercial other lending subsidiaries  852    807  
   Direct retail lending  1,980    1,836  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed  1,545    1,511  
   Sales finance  1,654    1,580  
   PCI  618    403  
    Total loans and leases$ 13,698    12,910  
  Goodwill     1,376  
  CDI     167  
  Other assets     908  
   Total assets acquired     18,257  
 Liabilities assumed:      
  Deposits:      
   Noninterest-bearing deposits     2,068  
   Interest-bearing deposits     12,063  
    Total deposits     14,131  
  Debt     1,222  
  Other liabilities     299  
   Total liabilities assumed     15,652  
 Consideration paid   $ 2,605  
            
 Cash paid   $ 739  
 Fair value of common stock issued, including replacement equity awards     1,866  

98

The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant assets and liabilities presented above.

Cash, due from banks and federal funds sold:The carrying amount of these assets is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the short-term nature of these assets.

Securities:Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimates are based on observable inputs including quoted market prices for similar instruments, quoted market prices that are not in an active market or other inputs that are observable in the market. In the absence of observable inputs, fair value is estimated based on pricing models and/or discounted cash flow methodologies.

Loans and leases:Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan, amortization status and current discount rates. Loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included as a reduction to the estimated cash flows.

CDI:This intangible asset represents the value of the relationships with deposit customers. The fair value was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of the deposit base, reserve requirements and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer deposits. The CDI is being amortized over 10 years based upon the estimated economic benefits received.

Deposits:The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the acquisition date. The fair values for time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered to the contractual interest rates on such time deposits.

Debt:The fair values of long-term debt instruments are estimated based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.

99
December 31, 2017 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)  Gains Losses 
AFS securities:        
U.S. Treasury $2,368
 $
 $77
 $2,291
GSE 187
 
 8
 179
Agency MBS 20,683
 8
 590
 20,101
States and political subdivisions 1,379
 37
 24
 1,392
Non-agency MBS 384
 192
 
 576
Other 8
 
 
 8
Total AFS securities $25,009
 $237
 $699
 $24,547
         
HTM securities:        
U.S. Treasury $1,098
 $8
 $
 $1,106
GSE 2,198
 11
 22
 2,187
Agency MBS 19,660
 33
 222
 19,471
States and political subdivisions 28
 
 
 28
Other 43
 2
 
 45
Total HTM securities $23,027
 $54
 $244
 $22,837

Other Bank and Branch Acquisitions

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations for certain bank and branch acquisitions. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are presented at their estimated fair values. In many cases, the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change. The fair value estimates for the current-year acquisitions are considered preliminary and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information becomes available.

     The Bank of Kentucky Citi - 41 Branches in Texas Citi - 21 Branches in Texas 
                 
          (Dollars in millions) 
 Period of acquisition     Q2 2015  Q1 2015  Q2 2014 
 Assets acquired:             
  Cash, due from banks and federal funds sold    $ 135  $ 14  $ 6  
  Securities      348    ―      ―    
  Loans      1,198    61    112  
  Goodwill      234    90    30  
  CDI      17    26    20  
  Other assets      94    47    15  
   Total assets acquired      2,026    238    183  
 Liabilities assumed:             
  Deposits      1,555    1,907    1,228  
  Debt      73    ―      ―    
  Other liabilities      3    ―      ―    
   Total liabilities assumed      1,631    1,907    1,228  
 Consideration paid (received)    $ 395  $ (1,669) $ (1,045) 
                   
 Cash paid (received)    $ 73  $ (1,669) $ (1,045) 
 Fair value of common stock issued      322    ―      ―    

The acquisition of The Bank of Kentucky provided 32 additional retail branches. The UPB of loans acquired from The Bank of Kentucky was $1.3 billion, and immaterial amounts of the intangible assets recognized are deductible for income tax purposes.

BB&T has reached an agreement to acquire National Penn Bancshares, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, which is currently expected to occur during 2016.

Non-Bank Activity

During the second quarter of 2015, BB&T purchased additional ownership interest in AmRisc, LP from the noncontrolling owners for cash and ownership of American Coastal. Since BB&T held a controlling interest in AmRisc, LP prior to this transaction, the total consideration less the establishment of a deferred tax asset was recognized as a charge to shareholders’ equity. BB&T will continue to consolidate AmRisc, LP and recognize a noncontrolling interest for the remaining interests held by the noncontrolling owners. The transfer of the ownership of American Coastal was accounted for as a sale, and the resulting pre-tax loss is included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The following table summarizes these transactions:

 Purchase of Additional Ownership of AmRisc, LP Sale of American Coastal 
            
 (Dollars in millions) 
 Fair value of American Coastal$ 216  Fair value of American Coastal$ 216  
 Cash paid  146  Net assets sold  (193) 
 Total consideration  362  Allocated goodwill  (49) 
 Deferred tax asset recognized  (140)  Pre-tax loss on sale  (26) 
       Income tax expense  (8) 
  Net charge to shareholders' equity$ 222   After-tax net loss on sale$ (34) 

100

TableofContents

NOTE 3. Securities

     Amortized Gross Unrealized Fair 
 December 31, 2015 Cost Gains Losses Value 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 AFS securities:             
  U.S. Treasury $ 1,836  $ 2  $ 6  $ 1,832  
  GSE   51    —      —      51  
  Agency MBS   20,463    22    439    20,046  
  States and political subdivisions   2,025    94    40    2,079  
  Non-agency MBS   198    23    —      221  
  Other   4    —      —      4  
  Acquired from FDIC   772    292    —      1,064  
   Total AFS securities $ 25,349  $ 433  $ 485  $ 25,297  
                 
 HTM securities:             
  U.S. Treasury $ 1,097  $ 22  $ —    $ 1,119  
  GSE   5,045    16    98    4,963  
  Agency MBS   12,267    70    22    12,315  
  States and political subdivisions   63    —      —      63  
  Other   58    2    1    59  
   Total HTM securities $ 18,530  $ 110  $ 121  $ 18,519  

     Amortized Gross Unrealized Fair 
 December 31, 2014 Cost Gains Losses Value 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 AFS securities:             
  U.S. Treasury $ 1,230  $ 1  $ —    $ 1,231  
  Agency MBS   16,358    93    297    16,154  
  States and political subdivisions   1,913    120    59    1,974  
  Non-agency MBS   232    32    —      264  
  Other   41    —      —      41  
  Acquired from FDIC   886    357    —      1,243  
   Total AFS securities $ 20,660  $ 603  $ 356  $ 20,907  
                 
 HTM securities:             
  U.S. Treasury $ 1,096  $ 23  $ —    $ 1,119  
  GSE   5,394    17    108    5,303  
  Agency MBS   13,120    137    12    13,245  
  States and political subdivisions   22    2    —      24  
  Other   608    14    —      622  
   Total HTM securities $ 20,240  $ 193  $ 120  $ 20,313  

BB&T transferred $517 million of HTM securities to AFS during the third quarter of 2015. These securities, which were sold by the end of the third quarter, represented investments in student loans for which there was a significant increase in risk weighting as a result of the implementation of Basel III.

The fair value of securities acquired from the FDIC included non-agency MBS of $768 million and $931 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and states and political subdivisions securities of $296 million and $312 million as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Effective October 1, 2014, securities subject to the commercial loss sharing agreement with the FDIC related to the Colonial acquisition were no longer covered by loss sharing; however, any gains on the sale of these securities through September 30, 2017 would be shared with the FDIC. Since these securities are in a significant unrealized gain position, they continue to be effectively covered as any declines in the unrealized gains of the securities down to a contractually specified amount would reduce the liability to the FDIC at the applicable percentage. The contractually-specified amount is the acquisition date fair value less any paydowns, redemptions or maturities and OTTI and totaled approximately $492 million at December 31, 2015. Any further declines below the contractually-specified amount would not be covered.

101
TableofContents
December 31, 2016 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)  Gains Losses 
AFS securities:        
U.S. Treasury $2,669
 $2
 $84
 $2,587
GSE 190
 
 10
 180
Agency MBS 21,819
 13
 568
 21,264
States and political subdivisions 2,198
 56
 49
 2,205
Non-agency MBS 446
 233
 
 679
Other 11
 
 
 11
Total AFS securities $27,333
 $304
 $711
 $26,926
         
HTM securities:        
U.S. Treasury $1,098
 $20
 $
 $1,118
GSE 2,197
 14
 30
 2,181
Agency MBS 13,225
 40
 180
 13,085
States and political subdivisions 110
 
 
 110
Other 50
 2
 
 52
Total HTM securities $16,680
 $76
 $210
 $16,546

Certain investments in marketable debt securities and MBS issued by FNMA and FHLMC exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2015.2017. The FNMA investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $12.2$14.7 billion and $12.0$14.4 billion, respectively. The FHLMC investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $5.8$10.2 billion and $5.7$10.0 billion, respectively.

The following table reflects changeschange in credit losses on securities with OTTI (excluding securities acquired from the FDIC) where a portion of the unrealized loss was recognized in OCI:

     Year Ended December 31, 
     2015 2014 2013 
              
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at beginning of period$ 64  $ 78  $ 98  
  Credit losses on securities without previous OTTI  ―      6    ―    
  Credit losses on securities for which OTTI was previously recognized  4    ―      ―    
  Reductions for securities sold/settled during the period  (22)   (17)   (20) 
  Credit recoveries through yield  (4)   (3)   ―    
 Balance at end of period$ 42  $ 64  $ 78  

OCI was immaterial for all periods presented.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the securities portfolio by contractual maturity are shown in the following table. The expected life of MBS may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay the underlying mortgage loans with or without prepayment penalties.

     AFS HTM 
     Amortized Fair Amortized Fair 
 December 31, 2015 Cost Value Cost Value 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Due in one year or less $ 265  $ 264  $ 1  $ 1  
 Due after one year through five years   1,661    1,667    2,097    2,101  
 Due after five years through ten years   971    992    4,062    3,998  
 Due after ten years   22,452    22,374    12,370    12,419  
  Total debt securities $ 25,349  $ 25,297  $ 18,530  $ 18,519  

The following tables present the fair values and gross unrealized losses of investments based on the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
                        
      Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
      Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized 
 December 31, 2015 Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses 
                        
      (Dollars in millions) 
 AFS securities:                   
  U.S. Treasury securities $ 1,211  $ 6  $ —    $ —    $ 1,211  $ 6  
  Agency MBS   12,052    199    5,576    240    17,628    439  
  States and political subdivisions   64    1    329    39    393    40  
   Total $ 13,327  $ 206  $ 5,905  $ 279  $ 19,232  $ 485  
                        
 HTM securities:                   
  GSE $ 2,307  $ 41  $ 1,743  $ 57  $ 4,050  $ 98  
  Agency MBS   3,992    21    124    1    4,116    22  
  Other securities   56    1    —      —      56    1  
   Total $ 6,355  $ 63  $ 1,867  $ 58  $ 8,222  $ 121  

102
TableofContents

      Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total 
      Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized 
 December 31, 2014 Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses 
                        
      (Dollars in millions) 
 AFS securities:                   
  Agency MBS $ 2,285  $ 19  $ 6,878  $ 278  $ 9,163  $ 297  
  States and political subdivisions   13    ―      449    59    462    59  
   Total $ 2,298  $ 19  $ 7,327  $ 337  $ 9,625  $ 356  
                        
 HTM securities:                   
  GSE $ 896  $ 5  $ 3,968  $ 103  $ 4,864  $ 108  
  Agency MBS   1,329    5    800    7    2,129    12  
   Total $ 2,225  $ 10  $ 4,768  $ 110  $ 6,993  $ 120  

  AFS HTM
December 31, 2017 Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)    
Due in one year or less $336
 $335
 $
 $
Due after one year through five years 498
 496
 2,237
 2,242
Due after five years through ten years 2,419
 2,341
 1,111
 1,103
Due after ten years 21,756
 21,375
 19,679
 19,492
Total debt securities $25,009
 $24,547
 $23,027
 $22,837
The following tables present the fair values and gross unrealized losses of investments based on the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
  Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
December 31, 2017 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in millions)      
AFS securities:            
U.S. Treasury $634
 $4
 $1,655
 $73
 $2,289
 $77
GSE 9
 
 170
 8
 179
 8
Agency MBS 5,077
 64
 13,920
 526
 18,997
 590
States and political subdivisions 201
 1
 355
 23
 556
 24
Total $5,921
 $69
 $16,100
 $630
 $22,021
 $699
             
HTM securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
GSE $1,470
 $12
 $290
 $10
 $1,760
 $22
Agency MBS 10,880
 77
 4,631
 145
 15,511
 222
Total $12,350
 $89

$4,921
 $155
 $17,271
 $244

  Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total
December 31, 2016 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in millions)      
AFS securities:            
U.S. Treasury $2,014
 $84
 $
 $
 $2,014
 $84
GSE 180
 10
 
 
 180
 10
Agency MBS 14,842
 342
 5,138
 226
 19,980
 568
States and political subdivisions 365
 7
 314
 42
 679
 49
Total $17,401
 $443
 $5,452
 $268
 $22,853
 $711
             
HTM securities:  
  
  
  
  
  
GSE $1,762
 $30
 $
 $
 $1,762
 $30
Agency MBS 7,717
 178
 305
 2
 8,022
 180
Total $9,479
 $208
 $305
 $2
 $9,784
 $210
Periodic reviews are conducted to identify and evaluate each investment with an unrealized loss for OTTI. An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities. The unrealized losses on U.S. Treasury securities, GSE securities and agency MBS were the result of increases in market interest rates compared to the date the securities were acquired rather than the credit quality of the issuers.

Cash flow modeling is used to evaluate non-agency MBS in an unrealized loss position for potential credit impairment. These models give consideration to long-term macroeconomic factors applied to current security default rates, prepayment rates and recovery rates and security-level performance. At December 31, 2015, one2017, there were no non-agency MBS had an immaterial amount ofwith other than temporary credit impairment.

At December 31, 2015, $39 million2017, the majority of the unrealized loss on municipal securities was the result of fair value hedge basis adjustments that are a component of amortized cost. Municipal securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated for credit impairment through a qualitative analysis of issuer performance and the primary source of repayment. At December 31, 2015,2017, the evaluation of municipal securities did not indicate any municipal securities with other than temporary credit impairment.

103

NOTE 4.3. Loans and ACL


During 2017, the first quartercategorization of 2014, approximately $8.3 billioncertain loans was revised to better reflect the nature of nonguaranteed, closed-end, first and second lien positionthe underlying loans. Prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

During 2017, an indirect loan portfolio totaling $244 million was acquired. In addition, residential mortgage loans along with the related allowance, were transferred from direct retail lending to residential mortgage to facilitate compliance with a series of new rules related to mortgage servicing associated with first and second lien position mortgages collateralized by real estate.

During the third quarter of 2014, approximately $550 million of loans, which were primarily performing residential mortgage TDRs, with a related ALLL of $57totaling $905 million were sold, for a gain of $42 million. During the fourth quarter of 2014, approximately $140which included $61 million of nonaccrual loans whichand $331 million of performing TDRs. During 2016, indirect lending portfolios totaling $2.9 billion were primarily residential mortgage NPLs, with aacquired.


The following tables summarize the delinquency status of loans HFI:
  Accruing    
December 31, 2017 Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days Or More Past Due Nonaccrual Total
(Dollars in millions)     
Commercial:          
Commercial and industrial $58,852
 $41
 $1
 $259
 $59,153
CRE 21,209
 8
 1
 45
 21,263
Lease financing 1,906
 4
 
 1
 1,911
Retail:         

Residential mortgage 27,659
 472
 465
 129
 28,725
Direct 11,756
 65
 6
 64
 11,891
Indirect 16,745
 412
 6
 72
 17,235
Revolving credit 2,837
 23
 12
 
 2,872
PCI 567
 27
 57
 
 651
Total $141,531
 $1,052
 $548
 $570
 $143,701

  Accruing    
December 31, 2016 Current 30-89 Days Past Due 90 Days Or More Past Due Nonaccrual Total
(Dollars in millions)     
Commercial:          
Commercial and industrial $57,326
 $44
 $
 $369
 $57,739
CRE 19,699
 8
 
 57
 19,764
Lease financing 1,669
 4
 
 4
 1,677
Retail:  
  
  
  
 

Residential mortgage 28,702
 525
 522
 172
 29,921
Direct 11,963
 60
 6
 63
 12,092
Indirect 18,110
 377
 6
 71
 18,564
Revolving credit 2,620
 23
 12
 
 2,655
PCI 784
 36
 90
 
 910
Total $140,873
 $1,077
 $636
 $736
 $143,322
The following table presents the carrying amount of loans by risk rating. PCI loans are excluded because their related ALLL is determined by loan pool performance and revolving credit loans are excluded as the loans are charged-off and not reclassified to nonperforming.
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Commercial & Industrial CRE Lease financing Commercial & Industrial CRE Lease financing
(Dollars in millions)      
Commercial:            
Pass $57,700
 $20,862
 $1,881
 $55,881
 $19,186
 $1,641
Special mention 268
 48
 6
 343
 162
 4
Substandard-performing 926
 308
 23
 1,146
 359
 28
Nonperforming 259
 45
 1
 369
 57
 4
Total $59,153
 $21,263
 $1,911
 $57,739
 $19,764
 $1,677
             
  Residential Mortgage Direct Indirect Residential Mortgage Direct Indirect
Retail:            
Performing $28,596
 $11,827
 $17,163
 $29,749
 $12,029
 $18,493
Nonperforming 129
 64
 72
 172
 63
 71
Total $28,725
 $11,891
 $17,235
 $29,921
 $12,092
 $18,564

 The following tables present a summary of $19 millionactivity in the ACL:
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Beginning Balance Charge-Offs Recoveries Provision (Benefit) Other Ending Balance
(Dollars in millions)      
Commercial:            
Commercial and industrial $530
 $(95) $36
 $51
 $
 $522
CRE 145
 (10) 16
 9
 
 160
Lease financing 7
 (5) 2
 5
 
 9
Retail:  
  
  
  
    
Residential mortgage 227
 (47) 2
 27
 
 209
Direct 103
 (61) 25
 39
 
 106
Indirect 327
 (402) 60
 363
 
 348
Revolving credit 106
 (76) 19
 59
 
 108
PCI 44
 (1) 
 (15) 
 28
ALLL 1,489
 (697) 160
 538
 
 1,490
RUFC 110
 
 
 9
 
 119
ACL $1,599
 $(697) $160
 $547
 $
 $1,609

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Beginning Balance Charge-Offs Recoveries Provision (Benefit) Other Ending Balance
(Dollars in millions)      
Commercial:            
Commercial and industrial $488
 $(143) $44
 $141
 $
 $530
CRE 175
 (9) 19
 (40) 
 145
Lease financing 5
 (6) 2
 6
 
 7
Retail:  
  
  
  
    
Residential mortgage 217
 (40) 3
 47
 
 227
Direct 105
 (53) 26
 25
 
 103
Indirect 305
 (366) 55
 333
 
 327
Revolving credit 104
 (69) 20
 51
 
 106
PCI 61
 (15) 
 (2) 
 44
ALLL 1,460
 (701) 169
 561
 
 1,489
RUFC 90
 
 
 11
 9
 110
ACL $1,550
 $(701) $169
 $572
 $9
 $1,599
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Beginning Balance Charge-Offs Recoveries Provision (Benefit) Other Ending Balance
(Dollars in millions)      
Commercial:            
Commercial and industrial $446
 $(90) $40
 $92
 $
 $488
CRE 212
 (24) 18
 (31) 
 175
Lease financing 4
 
 
 1
 
 5
Retail:  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential mortgage 253
 (46) 3
 7
 
 217
Direct 110
 (54) 29
 20
 
 105
Indirect 275
 (303) 42
 291
 
 305
Revolving credit 110
 (70) 20
 44
 
 104
PCI 64
 (1) 
 (2) 
 61
ALLL 1,474
 (588) 152
 422
 
 1,460
RUFC 60
 
 
 6
 24
 90
ACL $1,534
 $(588) $152
 $428
 $24
 $1,550

The following table provides a summary of loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment:
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Recorded Investment Related ALLL Recorded Investment Related ALLL
Commercial:        
Commercial and industrial $58,804
 $494
 $57,265
 $492
CRE 21,173
 154
 19,649
 136
Lease financing 1,910
 9
 1,672
 7
Retail:        
Residential mortgage 27,914
 143
 28,954
 144
Direct 11,815
 98
 12,011
 93
Indirect 16,935
 296
 18,308
 286
Revolving credit 2,842
 97
 2,626
 95
PCI 651
 28
 910
 44
Total $142,044
 $1,319
 $141,395
 $1,297


The following tables set forth certain information regarding impaired loans, excluding PCI and LHFS, that were soldindividually evaluated for reserves:
As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2017 UPB Recorded Investment Related ALLL Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
(Dollars in millions)  Without an ALLL With an ALLL   
Commercial:            
Commercial and industrial $381
 $136
 $213
 $28
 $424
 $6
CRE 91
 26
 64
 6
 109
 3
Lease financing 1
 
 1
 
 3
 
Retail:            
Residential mortgage 860
 132
 679
 67
 895
 37
Direct 99
 22
 54
 8
 78
 4
Indirect 308
 6
 294
 52
 269
 41
Revolving credit 30
 
 30
 10
 29
 1
Total $1,770
 $322
 $1,335
 $171
 $1,807
 $92

As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2016 UPB Recorded Investment Related ALLL Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
(Dollars in millions)  Without an ALLL With an ALLL   
Commercial:            
Commercial and industrial $505
 $204
 $271
 $38
 $483
 $6
CRE 121
 35
 80
 9
 114
 3
Lease financing 4
 1
 3
 
 4
 
Retail:     
   
   
    
Residential mortgage 1,026
 97
 870
 83
 843
 34
Direct 107
 13
 68
 10
 83
 5
Indirect 265
 5
 251
 41
 227
 33
Revolving credit 29
 
 29
 11
 31
 1
Total $2,057
 $355
 $1,572
 $192
 $1,785
 $82
The following table provides a gainsummary of $24 million. Both gains were recognized as reductions to the provision for credit losses.

Effective October 1, 2014, loans subject to the commercial loss sharing agreement with the FDIC related to the Colonial acquisition were no longer covered by loss sharing. At December 31, 2015, these loans had a carrying valueTDRs, all of $273 million, a UPB of $462 million and an allowance of $41 million andwhich are included in PCI. Loans with a carrying value of $539 million at December 31, 2015 continue to be covered by loss sharing and are included in PCI.

     Accruing      
          90 Days Or     
       30-89 Days More Past     
 December 31, 2015 Current Past Due Due Nonaccrual Total 
                    
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                
  Commercial and industrial $ 48,157  $ 36  $ ―    $ 237  $ 48,430  
  CRE-income producing properties   13,370    13    ―      38    13,421  
  CRE-construction and development   3,710    9    ―      13    3,732  
  Dealer floor plan   1,215    ―      ―      ―      1,215  
  Other lending subsidiaries   6,771    18    ―      6    6,795  
 Retail:                
  Direct retail lending   11,032    58    7    43    11,140  
  Revolving credit   2,478    22    10    ―      2,510  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   29,038    397    55    173    29,663  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   307    77    486    ―      870  
  Sales finance   10,243    72    5    7    10,327  
  Other lending subsidiaries   6,381    286    ―      59    6,726  
 PCI   966    42    114    ―      1,122  
   Total $ 133,668  $ 1,030  $ 677  $ 576  $ 135,951  

104
considered impaired:
TableofContents

      Accruing      
           90 Days Or     
        30-89 Days More Past     
 December 31, 2014 Current Past Due Due Nonaccrual Total 
                     
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                
  Commercial and industrial $ 41,192  $ 23  $ ―    $ 239  $ 41,454  
  CRE-income producing properties   10,644    4    ―      74    10,722  
  CRE-construction and development   2,708    1    ―      26    2,735  
  Dealer floor plan   1,091    ―      ―      ―      1,091  
  Other lending subsidiaries   5,337    15    ―      4    5,356  
 Retail:                
  Direct retail lending   8,045    41    12    48    8,146  
  Revolving credit   2,428    23    9    ―      2,460  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   29,468    392    83    164    30,107  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   251    82    648    2    983  
  Sales finance   9,437    62    5    5    9,509  
  Other lending subsidiaries   5,830    222    ―      54    6,106  
 PCI   994    33    188    ―      1,215  
   Total $ 117,425  $ 898  $ 945  $ 616  $ 119,884  

The following tables present the carrying amount of loans by risk rating. PCI loans are excluded because their related ALLL is determined by loan pool performance.
 
        CRE - CRE -     
     Commercial Income Producing Construction and Dealer Other Lending 
 December 31, 2015 & Industrial Properties Development Floor Plan Subsidiaries 
                    
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                
  Pass $ 46,760  $ 12,940  $ 3,619  $ 1,195  $ 6,757  
  Special mention   305    166    29    6    3  
  Substandard-performing   1,128    277    71    14    29  
  Nonperforming   237    38    13    ―      6  
   Total $ 48,430  $ 13,421  $ 3,732  $ 1,215  $ 6,795  

     Direct Retail Revolving Residential Sales Other Lending 
     Lending Credit Mortgage Finance Subsidiaries 
                    
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Retail:                
  Performing $ 11,097  $ 2,510  $ 30,360  $ 10,320  $ 6,667  
  Nonperforming   43    ―      173    7    59  
   Total $ 11,140  $ 2,510  $ 30,533  $ 10,327  $ 6,726  

        CRE - CRE -     
     Commercial Income Producing Construction and Dealer Other Lending 
 December 31, 2014 & Industrial Properties Development Floor Plan Subsidiaries 
                    
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                
  Pass $ 40,055  $ 10,253  $ 2,615  $ 1,037  $ 5,317  
  Special mention   163    67    7    50    10  
  Substandard-performing   997    328    87    4    25  
  Nonperforming   239    74    26    ―      4  
   Total $ 41,454  $ 10,722  $ 2,735  $ 1,091  $ 5,356  

105

      Direct Retail Revolving Residential Sales Other Lending 
      Lending Credit Mortgage Finance Subsidiaries 
                     
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Retail:                
  Performing $ 8,098  $ 2,460  $ 30,924  $ 9,504  $ 6,052  
  Nonperforming   48    ―      166    5    54  
   Total $ 8,146  $ 2,460  $ 31,090  $ 9,509  $ 6,106  

   ACL Rollforward 
 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Beginning Balance Charge-Offs Recoveries Provision (Benefit) Other Ending Balance 
                      
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                   
  Commercial and industrial $ 421  $ (81) $ 37  $ 89  $ ―    $ 466  
  CRE - income producing properties   162    (20)   7    (14)   ―      135  
  CRE - construction and development   48    (4)   11    (18)   ―      37  
  Dealer floor plan   10    ―      ―      (2)   ―      8  
  Other lending subsidiaries   21    (9)   3    7    ―      22  
 Retail:                   
  Direct retail lending   110    (54)   29    20    ―      105  
  Revolving credit   110    (70)   20    44    ―      104  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   217    (40)   3    14    ―      194  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   36    (6)   ―      (7)   ―      23  
  Sales finance   40    (26)   9    17    ―      40  
  Other lending subsidiaries   235    (277)   33    274    ―      265  
 PCI   64    (1)   ―      (2)   ―      61  
 ALLL   1,474    (588)   152    422    ―      1,460  
 RUFC   60    ―      ―      6    24    90  
 ACL $ 1,534  $ (588) $ 152  $ 428  $ 24  $ 1,550  

   ACL Rollforward 
 Year Ended December 31, 2014 Beginning Balance Charge-Offs Recoveries Provision (Benefit) Other Ending Balance 
                      
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                   
  Commercial and industrial $ 454  $ (131) $ 42  $ 56  $ ―    $ 421  
  CRE - income producing properties   149    (31)   14    30    ―      162  
  CRE - construction and development   76    (11)   19    (36)   ―      48  
  Dealer floor plan   8    ―      ―      2    ―      10  
  Other lending subsidiaries   15    (10)   3    11    ―      21  
 Retail:                   
  Direct retail lending   209    (69)   29    26    (85)   110  
  Revolving credit   115    (71)   19    47    ―      110  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   269    (82)   7    (62)   85    217  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   62    (2)   ―      (24)   ―      36  
  Sales finance   37    (23)   9    17    ―      40  
  Other lending subsidiaries   224    (259)   30    242    ―      235  
 PCI   114    (21)   ―      (29)   ―      64  
 ALLL   1,732    (710)   172    280    ―      1,474  
 RUFC   89    ―      ―      (29)   ―      60  
 ACL $ 1,821  $ (710) $ 172  $ 251  $ ―    $ 1,534  

106
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Performing TDRs:    
Commercial:    
Commercial and industrial $50
 $57
CRE 16
 25
Lease financing 
 
Retail:    
Residential mortgage 605
 769
Direct 62
 67
Indirect 281
 240
Revolving credit 29
 29
Total performing TDRs 1,043
 1,187
Nonperforming TDRs (also included in NPL disclosures) 189
 184
Total TDRs $1,232
 $1,371
ALLL attributable to TDRs $142
 $146

   ACL Rollforward 
    Beginning Charge-         Ending 
 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Balance Offs Recoveries Provision Other Balance 
                      
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:                   
  Commercial and industrial $ 470  $ (248) $ 47  $ 166  $ 19  $ 454  
  CRE - income producing properties   170    (74)   20    23    10    149  
  CRE - construction and development   134    (58)   31    (39)   8    76  
  Dealer floor plan   2    ―      ―      6    ―      8  
  Other lending subsidiaries   13    (3)   2    3    ―      15  
 Retail:                   
  Direct retail lending   300    (148)   38    15    4    209  
  Revolving credit   102    (85)   17    81    ―      115  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   296    (79)   3    5    44    269  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   32    (2)   ―      32    ―      62  
  Sales finance   27    (23)   9    24    ―      37  
  Other lending subsidiaries   264    (252)   32    245    (65)   224  
 PCI   128    (19)   ―      5    ―      114  
 Unallocated   80    ―      ―      (33)   (47)   ―    
 ALLL   2,018    (991)   199    533    (27)   1,732  
 RUFC   30    ―      ―      59    ―      89  
 ACL $ 2,048  $ (991) $ 199  $ 592  $ (27) $ 1,821  

The following table provides a summary of loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment.
                 
     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
   Recorded Investment Related ALLL Recorded Investment Related ALLL 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Commercial:             
  Commercial and industrial $ 48,110  $ 439  $ 41,120  $ 379  
  CRE-income producing properties   13,339    127    10,583    147  
  CRE-construction and development   3,697    32    2,670    39  
  Dealer floor plan   1,215    8    1,091    10  
  Other lending subsidiaries   6,789    21    5,351    20  
 Retail:             
  Direct retail lending   11,055    93    8,048    86  
  Revolving credit   2,477    91    2,419    94  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   29,228    153    29,660    181  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   553    1    622    4  
  Sales finance   10,308    39    9,488    36  
  Other lending subsidiaries   6,534    235    5,930    204  
 PCI   1,122    61    1,215    64  
   Total $ 134,427  $ 1,300  $ 118,197  $ 1,264  

107

The following tables set forth certain information regarding impaired loans, excluding PCI and LHFS, that were individually evaluated for reserves.
        
              Average Interest 
      Recorded   Related Recorded Income 
 As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2015 Investment UPB ALLL Investment Recognized 
                     
      (Dollars in millions) 
 With no related ALLL recorded:                
  Commercial:                
   Commercial and industrial $ 129  $ 164  $ ―    $ 95  $ 1  
   CRE-income producing properties   8    13    ―      17    ―    
   CRE-construction and development   8    11    ―      10    ―    
   Dealer floor plan   ―      ―      ―      2    ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries   2    3    ―      ―      ―    
  Retail:                
   Direct retail lending   11    40    ―      12    1  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   84    153    ―      97    4  
   Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   5    5    ―      3    ―    
   Sales finance   1    2    ―      1    ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries   4    8    ―      3    ―    
 With an ALLL recorded:                
  Commercial:                
   Commercial and industrial   191    194    27    223    5  
   CRE-income producing properties   74    77    8    96    3  
   CRE-construction and development   27    27    5    36    1  
   Dealer floor plan   ―      ―      ―      1    ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries   4    5    1    6    ―    
  Retail:                
   Direct retail lending   74    75    12    79    4  
   Revolving credit   33    33    13    36    1  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   351    368    41    354    15  
   Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   312    312    22    323    13  
   Sales finance   18    18    1    19    1  
   Other lending subsidiaries   188    190    30    179    28  
    Total $ 1,524  $ 1,698  $ 160  $ 1,592  $ 77  

108

              Average Interest 
      Recorded   Related Recorded Income 
 As Of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2014 Investment UPB ALLL Investment Recognized 
                     
      (Dollars in millions) 
 With no related ALLL recorded:                
  Commercial:                
   Commercial and industrial $ 87  $ 136  $ ―    $ 138  $ 2  
   CRE-income producing properties   18    25    ―      36    ―    
   CRE-construction and development   14    21    ―      20    ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries   ―      1    ―      ―      ―    
  Retail:                
   Direct retail lending   13    49    ―      14    1  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   87    141    ―      147    5  
   Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   3    4    ―      7    ―    
   Sales finance   1    2    ―      1    ―    
   Other lending subsidiaries   3    7    ―      3    ―    
 With an ALLL recorded:                
  Commercial:                
   Commercial and industrial   247    254    42    279    5  
   CRE-income producing properties   121    123    15    133    4  
   CRE-construction and development   51    52    9    65    2  
   Other lending subsidiaries   5    5    1    4    ―    
  Retail:                
   Direct retail lending   85    87    24    95    5  
   Revolving credit   41    41    16    45    2  
   Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed   360    370    36    700    31  
   Residential mortgage-government guaranteed   358    358    32    402    17  
   Sales finance   20    21    4    20    1  
   Other lending subsidiaries   173    175    31    148    22  
    Total $ 1,687  $ 1,872  $ 210  $ 2,257  $ 97  

The following table provides a summary of TDRs, all of which are considered impaired.
          
    December 31, 
    2015 2014 
          
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Performing TDRs:      
  Commercial:      
   Commercial and industrial$ 49  $ 64  
   CRE-income producing properties  13    27  
   CRE-construction and development  16    30  
  Direct retail lending  72    84  
  Revolving credit  33    41  
  Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed  288    261  
  Residential mortgage-government guaranteed  316    360  
  Sales finance  17    19  
  Other lending subsidiaries  178    164  
   Total performing TDRs  982    1,050  
 Nonperforming TDRs (also included in NPL disclosures)  146    126  
   Total TDRs$ 1,128  $ 1,176  
          
 ALLL attributable to TDRs$ 126  $ 159  

109

The following table summarizes the primary reason loan modifications were classified as TDRs and includes newly designated TDRs as well as modifications made to existing TDRs. Balances represent the recorded investment at the end of the quarter in which the modification was made. Rate modifications in this table include TDRs made with below market interest rates that also include modifications of loan structures.

      Year Ended December 31,
      2015 2014 2013
      Type of   Type of   Type of  
      Modification ALLL ModificationALLL ModificationALLL
      Rate Structure Impact Rate Structure Impact Rate Structure Impact
                                
      (Dollars in millions)
Commercial:                          
 Commercial and industrial$ 99  $ 45  $ 2  $ 112  $ 48  $ 4  $ 99  $ 27  $ 3 
 CRE - income producing properties  9    15    ―      18    18    ―      33    44    1 
 CRE - construction and development  8    25    1    25    22    ―      51    20    (2)
Retail:                          
 Direct retail lending  16    4    4    32    4    6    45    9    6 
 Revolving credit  16    ―      4    24    ―      4    26    ―      4 
 Residential mortgage-nonguaranteed  88    37    9    127    36    16    103    68    11 
 Residential mortgage-government                          
  guaranteed  189    ―      7    282    ―      12    141    ―      12 
 Sales finance  ―      10    1    1    14    3    4    7    3 
 Other lending subsidiaries  129    ―      17    130    ―      17    167    ―      34 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
  Type of Modification ALLL Impact Type of Modification ALLL Impact Type of Modification ALLL Impact
(Dollars in millions) Rate Structure  Rate Structure  Rate Structure 
Newly Designated TDRs:                  
Commercial:                  
Commercial and industrial $79
 $101
 $3
 $105
 $96
 $3
 $68
 $31
 $2
CRE 14
 10
 1
 12
 16
 
 11
 26
 1
Retail:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential mortgage 357
 46
 25
 431
 53
 28
 230
 34
 16
Direct 10
 3
 
 14
 1
 
 12
 2
 4
Indirect 192
 6
 21
 169
 7
 21
 129
 9
 18
Revolving credit 19
 
 4
 17
 
 4
 16
 
 4
Re-Modification of Previously Designated TDRs 176
 44
 
 79
 46
 
 88
 34
 
The pre-default balance for modifications that experienced a payment default that had been classified as TDRs during the previous 12 months was $81$104 million, $78$73 million and $78$81 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Payment default is defined as movement of the TDR to nonaccrual status, foreclosure or charge-off, whichever occurs first.

Changes in the carrying value and accretable yield of PCI loans are presented in the following table:
                          
   Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2014
   Purchased Impaired Purchased Nonimpaired Purchased Impaired Purchased Nonimpaired
   Accretable Carrying Accretable Carrying Accretable Carrying Accretable Carrying
   Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value
                          
   (Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of period$ 134  $ 579  $ 244  $ 636  $ 187  $ 863  $ 351  $ 1,172 
 Additions  98    402    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―   
 Accretion  (89)   89    (89)   89    (107)   107    (169)   169 
 Payments received, net  ―      (370)   ―      (303)   ―      (391)   ―      (705)
 Other, net  46    ―      21    ―      54    ―      62    ―   
Balance at end of period$ 189  $ 700  $ 176  $ 422  $ 134  $ 579  $ 244  $ 636 
                          
Outstanding UPB at end of period   $ 1,063     $ 587     $ 864     $ 860 

The following table presents additional information about BB&T’s loans and leases:
          
    December 31, 
    2015 2014 
          
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Unearned income, discounts and net deferred loan fees and costs, excluding PCI$ 433  $ 147  
 Residential mortgage loans in process of foreclosure  229    379  

The increase in unearned income, discountsfollowing table presents additional information about BB&T’s loans and net deferred loan fees and costs is primarily due to the acquisition of Susquehanna.

leases:
110
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Unearned income, discounts and net deferred loan fees and costs, excluding PCI $70
 $265
Residential mortgage loans in process of foreclosure 288
 366

NOTE 5.4. Premises and Equipment

A summary of premises and equipment is presented in the accompanying table:

    Estimated December 31, 
    Useful Life 2015 2014 
              
    (Years) (Dollars in millions) 
 Land and land improvements    $ 596  $ 533  
 Buildings and building improvements 40    1,503    1,431  
 Furniture and equipment 5 - 10    1,030    986  
 Leasehold improvements      721    670  
 Construction in progress      122    47  
 Capitalized leases on premises and equipment      67    61  
  Total      4,039    3,728  
 Accumulated depreciation and amortization      (2,032)   (1,901) 
  Net premises and equipment    $ 2,007  $ 1,827  

The following table excludes assets related to BB&T's lease financing business.
                    
           Year Ended December 31, 
           2015 2014  2013  
                    
            (Dollars in millions) 
 Rent expense applicable to operating leases         $ 245  $ 227  $ 230  
 Rental income from owned properties and subleases           7    7    8  
                    
  Year Ended December 31,    
  2016 2017  2018  2019  2020  Thereafter 
                    
   (Dollars in millions) 
 Future minimum lease payments for operating leases$ 250  $ 229  $ 200  $ 175  $ 147  $ 591  

 Estimated Useful Life December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Land and land improvements    $583
 $611
Buildings and building improvements40 years 1,660
 1,628
Furniture and equipment3-15 1,146
 1,121
Leasehold improvements    733
 791
Construction in progress    52
 62
Capitalized leases on premises and equipment    58
 66
Total    4,232
 4,279
Accumulated depreciation and amortization    (2,177) (2,172)
Net premises and equipment    $2,055
 $2,107

The following table excludes assets related to the lease financing business:
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Rent expense applicable to operating leases $249
 $250
 $223
Rental income from owned properties and subleases 12
 8
 7
  Year Ended December 31,  
(Dollars in millions) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter
Future minimum lease payments for operating leases $255
 $228
 $199
 $173
 $147
 $509

NOTE 6.5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill attributable to BB&T’s operating segments are reflected in the table below. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the operating segments were reorganized and goodwill was reallocated to the new segments based upon the relative fair value of the underlying reporting units, as applicable. Refer to "Note 19. Operating Segments" for additional information. There have been no goodwill impairments recorded to date.

  Community Banking Residential Mortgage Banking Dealer Financial Services Specialized Lending Insurance Services Financial Services Total
                      
  (Dollars in millions)
Goodwill, January 1, 2013$ 4,900  $ 7  $ 111  $ 99  $ 1,495  $ 192  $ 6,804 
 Contingent consideration  ―      ―      ―      ―      6    ―      6 
 Other adjustments  24    ―      ―      (11)   (9)   ―      4 
Goodwill, December 31, 2013$ 4,924  $ 7  $ 111  $ 88  $ 1,492  $ 192  $ 6,814 
 Acquired goodwill, net  29    ―      ―      ―      12    ―      41 
 Contingent consideration  ―      ―      ―      ―      14    ―      14 
 Other adjustments  (319)   319    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―   
Goodwill, December 31, 2014$ 4,634  $ 326  $ 111  $ 88  $ 1,518  $ 192  $ 6,869 
 Acquired goodwill, net  1,548    ―      ―      155    16    7    1,726 
 American Coastal sale  ―      ―      ―      ―      (49)   ―      (49)
 Other adjustments  5    ―      ―      ―      (3)   ―      2 
Goodwill, December 31, 2015$ 6,187  $ 326  $ 111  $ 243  $ 1,482  $ 199  $ 8,548 

(Dollars in millions) Community Banking Residential Mortgage Banking Dealer Financial Services Specialized Lending Insurance Holdings Financial Services Total
Goodwill, January 1, 2015 $4,634
 $326
 $111
 $88
 $1,518
 $192
 $6,869
Acquired goodwill, net 1,501
 43
 
 155
 16
 11
 1,726
American Coastal sale 
 
 
 
 (49) 
 (49)
Other adjustments 5
 
 
 
 (3) 
 2
Goodwill, December 31, 2015 6,140
 369
 111
 243
 1,482
 203
 8,548
Acquired goodwill, net 753
 39
 
 2
 270
 9
 1,073
Other adjustments 139
 8
 
 (132) 
 2
 17
Goodwill, December 31, 2016 7,032
 416
 111
 113
 1,752
 214
 9,638
Other adjustments (12) 6
 
 (9) (5) 
 (20)
Goodwill, prior to reorganization $7,020
 $422
 $111
 $104
 $1,747
 $214
 $9,618
               
Goodwill, after reorganization     CB-Retail CB-Commercial FS&CF IH&PF Total
Goodwill, December 31, 2017     $3,724
 $3,862
 $259
 $1,773
 $9,618
During 2016, the purchase price allocation for Susquehanna was finalized. During 2017, the purchase price allocations for National Penn and Swett & Crawford were finalized. The 2013 adjustments to goodwill within Community Banking and Insurance Services reflect the finalizationrelated effects of valuations for certain assets and liabilities of the above acquisitions. The 2013 adjustment to Specialized Lending primarily represents the goodwill associated with a subsidiary that was sold.

During 2014, the transfer of closed-end, first and second lien position residential mortgage loans from Community Banking to Residential Mortgage Banking resulted in a reallocation of the related goodwill, which isthese finalizations are included in other adjustments in the above table.

111

During 2015, BB&T sold American Coastal,

The following table, which resulted inexcludes fully amortized intangibles, presents information for identifiable intangible assets: 
    December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount
CDI 7.0 years $605
 $(409) $196
 $825
 $(565) $260
Other, primarily customer relationship intangibles 12.0 1,211
 (696) 515
 1,249
 (655) 594
Total   $1,816
 $(1,105)
$711

$2,074
 $(1,220) $854

 The estimated amortization expense for the allocation and write-off of goodwill from the Insurance Services segment.

The following table presents information for identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization:
                         
       December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
    Wtd. Avg. Remaining Life Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount 
                         
    (Years) (Dollars in millions) 
 CDI  8.4  $ 903  $ (634) $ 269  $ 693  $ (585) $ 108  
 Other, primarily customer relationship                     
  intangibles  14.0    1,164    (747)   417    1,088    (691)   397  
  Total   $ 2,067  $ (1,381) $ 686  $ 1,781  $ (1,276) $ 505  

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016 2017  2018  2019  2020  
                 
   (Dollars in millions) 
 Estimated amortization expense of identifiable intangibles$ 117  $ 98  $ 83  $ 69  $ 57  

next five years is presented as follows:

  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Estimated amortization expense of identifiable intangibles $122
 $104
 $87
 $74
 $64

NOTE 7.6. Loan Servicing

Residential Mortgage Banking Activities

The following tables summarize residential mortgage banking activities. BB&T manages its own residential mortgage loans, including PCI loans.

    December 31, 
    2015 2014 
          
    (Dollars in millions) 
 UPB of mortgage loan servicing portfolio$ 116,817  $ 115,476  
 UPB of home equity loan servicing portfolio  5,352    6,781  
 UPB of residential mortgage and home equity loan servicing portfolio$ 122,169  $ 122,257  
 UPB of residential mortgage loans serviced for others (primarily agency      
  conforming fixed rate)$ 91,132  $ 90,230  
 Mortgage loans sold with recourse  702    667  
 Maximum recourse exposure from mortgage loans sold with recourse liability  326    344  
 Indemnification, recourse and repurchase reserves  79    94  
 FHA-insured mortgage loan reserve  85    85  

  As Of / For The Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
UPB of residential mortgage and home equity loan servicing portfolio $118,424
 $121,639
 $122,169
UPB of residential mortgage loans serviced for others, primarily agency conforming fixed rate 89,124
 90,325
 91,132
Mortgage loans sold with recourse 490
 578
 702
Maximum recourse exposure from mortgage loans sold with recourse liability 251
 282
 326
Indemnification, recourse and repurchase reserves 37
 40
 79
UPB of residential mortgage loans sold 12,423
 15,675
 14,764
Pre-tax gains recognized on mortgage loans sold and held for sale 153
 139
 148
Servicing fees recognized from mortgage loans serviced for others 261
 268
 273
Approximate weighted average servicing fee on the outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for others 0.28% 0.28% 0.29%
Weighted average interest rate on mortgage loans serviced for others 4.00
 4.03
 4.12
During June 2014,2016, BB&T received notice from the HUD-OIG that BB&T had been selected for an audit/surveypaid $83 million to assess BB&T's compliance withsettle certain FHA loan origination and quality control requirements. In late 2014 and in 2015, BB&T received subpoenas from the HUD-OIG andmatters pursuant to an agreement with the Department of Justice seeking additional information regarding its lending practicesJustice. In addition, the Company separately received recoveries of $71 million, resulting in connection with loans insured by the FHA. BB&T is cooperating with the investigation. While the outcomea net benefit of the investigation is unknown and neither the Department of Justice nor the HUD-OIG has asserted any claims, similar reviews and related matters with other financial institutions have resulted in cash settlements and other remedial actions. BB&T identified a potential exposure related to losses incurred by the FHA on defaulted loans that ranges from $25$73 million, to $105 million and recognized an $85 million charge during 2014. The income statement impact of this adjustmentwhich was included in other expense on the Consolidated Statements of lncome. The ultimate resolutionIncome. During 2016, BB&T released $31 million of this matter is uncertain and the estimates of this exposure are subject to the application of significant judgment and therefore cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.

During 2014, BB&T also recognized a $33 million adjustment related to the indemnificationmortgage repurchase reserves, for mortgage loans sold, which represents an increase in estimated losses that may be incurred on FHA-insured mortgage loans that have not yet defaulted. The income statement impact of this adjustment was primarily driven by lower anticipated loan repurchase requests. These adjustments were included in loan-related expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Payments made to date for recourse exposure on residential mortgage loans sold with recourse liability have been immaterial.

112

    As Of / For The 
    Year Ended December 31, 
    2015 2014 2013 
                
    (Dollars in millions) 
 UPB of residential mortgage loans sold from the LHFS portfolio$ 14,764   $ 13,400   $ 28,900   
 Pre-tax gains recognized on mortgage loans sold and held for sale  148     110     292   
 Servicing fees recognized from mortgage loans serviced for others  273     275     259   
 Approximate weighted average servicing fee on the outstanding balance            
  of residential mortgage loans serviced for others  0.29 %   0.29 %   0.30 % 
 Weighted average interest rate on mortgage loans serviced for others  4.12     4.20     4.24   

The following table presents a roll forward of the carrying value of residential MSRs recorded at fair value:
               
      Year Ended December 31, 
      2015 2014 2013 
               
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Carrying value, January 1,$ 844  $ 1,047  $ 627  
  Additions  156    141    336  
  Change in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions:         
   Prepayment speeds  91    (219)   287  
   Weighted average OAS  (52)   ―      (31) 
   Servicing costs  (25)   (2)   (29) 
  Realization of expected net servicing cash flows, passage of time and other  (134)   (123)   (143) 
 Carrying value, December 31,$ 880  $ 844  $ 1,047  
               
 Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments used to mitigate the         
  income statement effect of changes in fair value$ 32  $ 251  $ (197) 

The sensitivity of the fair value of the residential MSRs to changes in key assumptions is included in the accompanying table:
                        
    December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
    Range Weighted Range Weighted 
    Min Max Average Min Max Average 
                        
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Prepayment speed 8.1 %  9.0 %   8.7 %  10.8 %  12.8 %   12.0 % 
  Effect on fair value of a 10% increase      $ (28)        $ (30)  
  Effect on fair value of a 20% increase        (54)          (58)  
                        
 OAS 10.3 %  10.6 %   10.4 %  9.1 %  9.9 %   9.3 % 
  Effect on fair value of a 10% increase      $ (32)        $ (26)  
  Effect on fair value of a 20% increase        (61)          (50)  
                        
 Composition of loans serviced for others:                    
  Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans        99.2 %         99.4 % 
  Adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans        0.8           0.6   
   Total        100.0 %         100.0 % 
                        
 Weighted average life        6.8 yrs         5.7 yrs 

The following table presents a roll forward of the carrying value of residential MSRs recorded at fair value:
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Carrying value, beginning of year $915
 $880
 $844
Additions 123
 146
 156
Change in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions:      
Prepayment speeds (42) 13
 91
Weighted average OAS 46
 10
 (52)
Servicing costs 9
 2
 (25)
Realization of expected net servicing cash flows, passage of time and other (137) (136) (134)
Carrying value, end of year $914
 $915
 $880
       
Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments used to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in fair value $
 $32
 $32


The sensitivity of the fair value of the residential MSRs to changes in key assumptions is included in the accompanying table:
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Range Weighted Average Range Weighted Average
(Dollars in millions) Min Max  Min Max 
Prepayment speed 7.1% 10.1% 9.1% 7.5% 8.4% 8.1%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase     $(31)     $(28)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase     (60)     (54)
             
OAS 8.4% 8.9% 8.5% 9.8% 10.2% 10.0%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase     $(28)     $(33)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase     (54)     (64)
             
Composition of loans serviced for others:  
  
  
  
  
  
Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans  
  
 99.1%  
  
 99.1%
Adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans  
  
 0.9
  
  
 0.9
Total  
  
 100.0%  
  
 100.0%
             
Weighted average life  
  
 6.4 years  
  
 7.0 years
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the above table, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

Commercial Mortgage Banking Activities

CRE mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in loans and leases on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes commercial mortgage banking activities for the periods presented:

113
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
UPB of CRE mortgages serviced for others $28,441
 $29,333
CRE mortgages serviced for others covered by recourse provisions 4,153
 4,240
Maximum recourse exposure from CRE mortgages sold with recourse liability 1,218
 1,272
Recorded reserves related to recourse exposure 5
 7
Originated CRE mortgages during the year 6,753
 7,145
Commercial MSRs at fair value 142
 137

     December 31, 
     2015 2014 
           
     (Dollars in millions) 
 UPB of CRE mortgages serviced for others$ 28,163  $ 27,599  
 CRE mortgages serviced for others covered by recourse provisions  4,198    4,264  
 Maximum recourse exposure from CRE mortgages sold with recourse liability  1,259    1,278  
 Recorded reserves related to recourse exposure  7    7  
 Originated CRE mortgages during the year  7,012    5,265  

NOTE 7. Deposits

The composition of deposits is presented in the following table:
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Noninterest-bearing deposits $53,767
 $50,697
Interest checking 27,677
 30,263
Money market and savings 62,757
 64,883
Time deposits 13,170
 14,391
Total deposits $157,371
 $160,234
     
Time deposits greater than $250,000 $2,622
 $2,179


NOTE 8. Deposits

     December 31, 
     2015 2014 
           
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Noninterest-bearing deposits$ 45,695  $ 38,786  
 Interest checking  25,410    20,262  
 Money market and savings  60,461    50,604  
 Time deposits  17,558    19,388  
  Total deposits$ 149,124  $ 129,040  
           
 Time deposits $100,000 and greater$ 7,562  $ 9,782  
 Time deposits $250,000 and greater  3,497    5,753  

Long-Term Debt

The following table presents a summary of long-term debt:
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
      Stated Rate Effective Rate Carrying Carrying
(Dollars in millions) Maturity Min Max  Amount Amount
BB&T Corporation:              
Fixed rate senior notes 2018to2024 2.05% 6.85% 2.89% $8,562
 $7,600
Floating rate senior notes 2018 2022 1.60
 2.45
 2.13
 2,547
 1,898
Fixed rate subordinated notes 2019 2022 3.95
 5.25
 1.98
 933
 1,338
Branch Bank:              
Fixed rate senior notes 2018 2022 1.45
 2.85
 2.56
 5,653
 4,209
Floating rate senior notes 2019 2020 1.74
 1.91
 2.10
 1,149
 250
Fixed rate subordinated notes 2025 2026 3.63
 3.80
 3.58
 2,119
 2,138
Floating rate subordinated notes   

 

 

 
 262
FHLB advances (1) 2018 2034 
 5.50
 1.49
 2,480
 4,118
Other long-term debt         

 205
 152
Total long-term debt         

 $23,648
 $21,965
114
(1)FHLB advances had a weighted average maturity of 3.8 years at December 31, 2017.

NOTE 9. Long-Term Debt

      December 31, 
      2015 2014 
            
      (Dollars in millions) 
 BB&T Corporation:      
  3.95% senior notes due 2016$ 500  $ 500  
  3.20% senior notes due 2016  1,000    1,000  
  2.15% senior notes due 2017  749    749  
  1.60% senior notes due 2017  749    749  
  1.45% senior notes due 2018  500    500  
  Floating rate senior notes due 2018 (LIBOR-based, 1.37% at December 31, 2015)  400    400  
  2.05% senior notes due 2018  600    599  
  6.85% senior notes due 2019  540    539  
  2.25% senior notes due 2019  648    648  
  Floating rate senior notes due 2019 (LIBOR-based, 0.99% at December 31, 2015)  450    450  
  2.45% senior notes due 2020  1,298    1,298  
  2.63% senior notes due 2020  999    ―    
  Floating rate senior notes due 2020 (LIBOR-based, 1.04% at December 31, 2015)  200    200  
  5.38% senior notes due 2022  166    ―    
  5.20% subordinated notes due 2015  ―      933  
  4.90% subordinated notes due 2017  356    353  
  5.25% subordinated notes due 2019  586    586  
  3.95% subordinated notes due 2022  299    298  
            
 Branch Bank:      
  1.45% senior notes due 2016  750    750  
  Floating rate senior notes due 2016 (LIBOR-based, 0.84% at December 31, 2015)  375    500  
  1.05% senior notes due 2016  500    500  
  1.00% senior notes due 2017  599    599  
  1.35% senior notes due 2017  750    750  
  2.30% senior notes due 2018  750    750  
  2.85% senior notes due 2021  700    699  
  5.63% subordinated notes due 2016  386    386  
  Floating rate subordinated notes due 2016 (LIBOR-based, 0.82% at December 31, 2015)  350    350  
  Floating rate subordinated note due 2017 (LIBOR-based, 0.68% at December 31, 2015)  262    262  
  3.63% subordinated notes due 2025  1,249    ―    
  3.80% subordinated notes due 2026  848    848  
            
 FHLB advances to Branch Bank:      
  Varying maturities to 2034  5,582    6,496  
            
 Other long-term debt  154    119  
            
 Fair value hedge-related basis adjustments  474    501  
   Total long-term debt$ 23,769  $ 23,312  

115

The following table reflects the carrying amounts and effective interest rates for long-term debt:
              
   December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
   Carrying Effective Carrying Effective
 Amount Rate Amount Rate
              
   (Dollars in millions)
BB&T Corporation fixed rate senior notes$ 7,831   2.35 % $ 6,669  2.39 %
BB&T Corporation floating rate senior notes  1,050   1.20     1,050  1.07  
BB&T Corporation fixed rate subordinated notes  1,382   1.52     2,362  2.30  
Branch Bank fixed rate senior notes  4,071   1.62     4,060  1.72  
Branch Bank floating rate senior notes  375   0.92     500  0.72  
Branch Bank fixed rate subordinated notes  2,562   3.13     1,299  2.86  
Branch Bank floating rate subordinated notes  612   3.24     612  3.27  
FHLB advances (weighted average maturity of 4.8 years at December 31, 2015)  5,732   4.02     6,641  4.03  
Other long-term debt  154       119    
 Total long-term debt$ 23,769     $ 23,312    

The effective rates above reflect the impact of cash flowhedges and fair value hedges, as applicable.issuance costs. Subordinated notes with a remaining maturity of one year or greater qualify under the risk-based capital guidelines as Tier 2 supplementary capital, subject to certain limitations.

During the second quarter2017, BB&T terminated FHLB advances totaling $2.9 billion of par value, which resulted in a pre-tax loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $392 million. During 2015, BB&T terminated FHLB advances totaling $931 million, which resulted in a pre-tax loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $172 million. During

The following table presents future debt maturities:
  Year Ended December 31, Thereafter
(Dollars in millions) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 
Future debt maturities $2,446
 $4,837
 $6,008
 $3,256
 $2,851
 $4,161

NOTE 9. Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock

The following table presents a summary of the third quarternon-cumulative perpetual preferred stock as of 2014, BB&T terminated FHLB advances totaling $1.1 billion, resulting in a pre-tax loss on early extinguishment of $122 million.

  Year Ended December 31,  2021 
  2016 2017  2018  2019  2020  and later
                   
   (Dollars in millions)
Future debt maturities (excluding capital leases)$ 5,574  $ 3,854  $ 2,324  $ 2,282  $ 2,524  $ 7,170 

116
December 31, 2017:
TableofContents

NOTE 10. Shareholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock
                  
The following table presents a summary of the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock as of December 31, 2015:
                  
       Earliest       
     Issuance Redemption Liquidation Carrying Dividend 
 Issue Date Date Amount Amount Rate 
                  
         (Dollars in millions)    
 Series D 5/1/12 5/1/17 $ 575  $ 559  5.850 % 
 Series E 7/31/12 8/1/17   1,150    1,120  5.625   
 Series F 10/31/12 11/1/17   450    437  5.200   
 Series G 5/1/13 6/1/18   500    487  5.200   
        $ 2,675  $ 2,603     

Preferred Stock Issue Issuance Date Earliest Redemption Date Liquidation Amount Carrying Amount Dividend Rate
(Dollars in millions)     
Series D 5/1/2012 5/1/2017 $575
 $559
 5.850%
Series E 7/31/2012 8/1/2017 1,150
 1,120
 5.625
Series F 10/31/2012 11/1/2017 450
 437
 5.200
Series G 5/1/2013 6/1/2018 500
 487
 5.200
Series H 3/9/2016 6/1/2021 465
 450
 5.625
Total     $3,140
 $3,053
  
Dividends on the preferred stock, if declared, accrue and are payable quarterly, in arrears. For each issuance, BB&T issued depositary shares, each of which represents a fractional ownership interest in a share of the Company’s preferred stock. The preferred stock has no stated maturity and redemption is solely at the option of the Company in whole, but not in part, upon the occurrence of a regulatory capital treatment event, as defined. In addition, the preferred stock may be redeemed in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date after five years from the date of issuance. Under current rules, any redemption of the preferred stock is subject to prior approval of the FRB. The preferred stock is not subject to any sinking fund or other obligations of the Company.



Equity-Based Compensation Plans

At December 31, 2015,2017, options, restricted shares, RSUs, and RSUsPSUs were outstanding from equity-based compensation plans that have been approved by shareholders.shareholders and plans assumed from acquired entities. Those plans are intended to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining employees, directors and independent contractors and to associate the interests of eligible participants with those of BB&T and its shareholders.

The majority of outstanding awards and awards available to be issued relate to plans that allow for accelerated vesting of awards for holders who retire and have met all retirement eligibility requirements or in connection with certain other events.Untilevents. Until vested, certain of these awards are subject to forfeiture under specified circumstances.

The following table provides a summary of the equity-based compensation plans:

Equity-Based Compensation PlansDecember 31, 2015
 December 31, 2017
Shares available for future grants (in thousands)  22,016 19,408
 
Vesting period, minimum 1.0
years
Vesting period, awards granted prior to 2010maximum 5.0yrs
 
Vesting period, awards granted after 20091.0 to 5.0
Option term 10.0

 

The fair value of RSUs and PSUs is based on the common stock price on the grant date less the present value of expected dividends that will be foregone during the vesting period. The fair value of options is measured on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Substantially all awards are granted in February of each year. Grants to non-executive employees primarily consist of RSUs.

117

A summary of selected data related to equity-based compensation costs follows:
              
     Year Ended December 31, 
     2015  2014  2013  
              
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Equity-based compensation expense$ 106  $ 102  $ 96  
 Income tax benefit from equity-based compensation expense  40    39    36  
 Intrinsic value of options exercised and RSUs that vested during the year  170    280    102  
 Grant date fair value of equity-based awards that vested during the year  115    113    80  
              
        December 31, 
        2015  2014  
              
        (Dollars in millions) 
 Unrecognized compensation cost related to equity-based awards   $ 103  $ 99  
 Weighted-average life over which compensation cost is expected to be recognized (years)   2.2    2.2  

The following tables present the activity during 2015 related to equity-based compensation awards:  
   
           Wtd. Avg. 
     Wtd. Avg. Aggregate Remaining 
     Exercise Intrinsic Contractual 
   Options Price Value  Life 
              
   (Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 
 Outstanding at January 1, 2015 28,374  $ 35.09        
  Replacement awards granted in connection with acquisitions 823    41.68        
  Granted 434    38.22        
  Exercised (3,394)   32.31        
  Forfeited or expired (5,660)   38.69        
 Outstanding at December 31, 2015 20,577    34.89  $ 103   3.16 yrs 
 Exercisable at December 31, 2015 18,905    35.06    95   2.80   
 Exercisable and expected to vest at December 31, 2015 20,467    34.90    102   3.14   

     Wtd. Avg. 
   RestrictedGrant Date 
   Shares/Units Fair Value 
        
   (Shares in thousands) 
 Nonvested at January 1, 2015 12,075  $ 27.38  
  Granted 3,772    33.27  
  Vested (3,703)   25.29  
  Forfeited (320)   31.24  
 Nonvested at December 31, 2015 11,824    29.81  
 Expected to vest at December 31, 2015 10,853    29.81  

A summary of selected data related to equity-based compensation costs follows:
  As of / For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Equity-based compensation expense $132
 $115
 $106
Income tax benefit from equity-based compensation expense 34
 43
 40
Intrinsic value of options exercised, and RSUs and PSUs that vested during the year 261
 159
 170
Grant date fair value of equity-based awards that vested during the year 116
 98
 115
Unrecognized compensation cost related to equity-based awards 132
 109
 103
Weighted-average life over which compensation cost is expected to be recognized (years) 2.4
 2.3
 2.2
The following table presents the activity during 2017 related to awards of RSUs, PSUs and restricted shares:
(Shares/units in thousands) Shares/Units Wtd. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2017 13,516
 $29.39
Granted 3,924
 42.88
Vested (4,142) 27.75
Forfeited (350) 33.29
Nonvested at December 31, 2017 12,948
 33.90
Expected to vest at December 31, 2017 11,946
 33.90
Share Repurchase Plan Activity

During 2017, the Company repurchased $1.6 billion of common stock, which represented 35.5 million shares, through a combination of open market and accelerated share repurchases. During 2016, the Company repurchased $320 million of common stock, which represented 8.4 million shares, through open market purchases. In addition, the Company commenced a $200 million accelerated share repurchase program, which resulted in the retirement of 3.4 million shares during the fourth quarter of 2016 and concluded in January 2017 with approximately 910,000 additional shares being retired. Repurchased shares revert to the status of authorized and unissued shares upon repurchase. At December 31, 2015,2017, BB&T was authorizedhad remaining authorization to repurchase up to 50$640 million shares of common stock under the 2015 Repurchase Plan, which replaced the 2006 Repurchase Plan at the Board of Directors’ authorization during June of 2015. No shares of common stock were repurchased under either plan during 2015, 2014 or 2013.

approved repurchase plan.


NOTE 10. AOCI

The following table summarizes activity in AOCI:
(Dollars in millions) Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities Other, net Total
AOCI balance, January 1, 2015 $(626) $(54) $152
 $(207) $(16) $(751)
OCI before reclassifications, net of tax (139) (81) (206) 19
 (9) (416)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI:            
Before tax (1) 67
 83
 32
 31
 9
 222
Tax effect 25
 31
 12
 12
 3
 83
Amounts reclassified, net of tax 42
 52
 20
 19
 6
 139
Total OCI, net of tax (97) (29) (186) 38
 (3) (277)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2015 (723) (83) (34) (169) (19) (1,028)
OCI before reclassifications, net of tax (91) (16) (201) 148
 1
 (159)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI:  
  
  
  
  
  
Before tax (1) 80
 11
 (39) 33
 1
 86
Tax effect 30
 4
 (15) 12
 
 31
Amounts reclassified, net of tax 50
 7
 (24) 21
 1
 55
Total OCI, net of tax (41) (9) (225) 169
 2
 (104)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2016 (764) (92) (259) 
 (17) (1,132)
OCI before reclassifications, net of tax (129) 7
 (23) 
 5
 (140)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI:            
Before tax (1) 72
 15
 (7) 
 
 80
Tax effect 27
 4
 (3) 
 
 28
Amounts reclassified, net of tax 45
 11
 (4) 
 
 52
Total OCI, net of tax (84) 18
 (27) 
 5
 (88)
Reclassification of certain tax effects (156) (18) (70) 
 (3) (247)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2017 $(1,004) $(92) $(356) $
 $(15) $(1,467)
118
(1)Amounts related to unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs are included in personnel expense, amounts related to unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges are included in net interest income, amounts related to unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities are included in net interest income or securities gains/losses when realized, amounts related to FDIC's share of unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities are included in FDIC loss share income, net and amounts related to other, net are primarily included in net interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

NOTE 11. AOCI

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities Other, net Total
                   
      (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, January 1, 2015 $ (626) $ (54) $ 152  $ (207) $ (16) $ (751)
 OCI before reclassifications, net of tax   (139)   (81)   (206)   19    (9)   (416)
 Amounts reclassified from AOCI:   ��              
  Personnel expense   67    ―      ―      ―      ―      67 
  Interest income   ―      ―      29    ―      9    38 
  Interest expense   ―      83    ―      ―      ―      83 
  FDIC loss share income, net   ―      ―      ―      31    ―      31 
  Securities (gains) losses, net   ―      ―      3    ―      ―      3 
   Total before income taxes   67    83    32    31    9    222 
   Less: Income taxes   25    31    12    12    3    83 
    Net of income taxes   42    52    20    19    6    139 
 Net change in AOCI   (97)   (29)   (186)   38    (3)   (277)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2015 $ (723) $ (83) $ (34) $ (169) $ (19) $ (1,028)

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities Other, net Total
                   
      (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, January 1, 2014 $ (303) $ 2  $ (42) $ (235) $ (15) $ (593)
 OCI before reclassifications, net of tax   (334)   (107)   207    ―      (5)   (239)
 Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                  
  Personnel expense   17    ―      ―      ―      ―      17 
  Interest income   ―      ―      (24)   ―      6    (18)
  Interest expense   ―      82    ―      ―      ―      82 
  FDIC loss share income, net   ―      ―      ―      45    ―      45 
  Securities (gains) losses, net   ―      ―      3    ―      ―      3 
   Total before income taxes   17    82    (21)   45    6    129 
   Less: Income taxes   6    31    (8)   17    2    48 
    Net of income taxes   11    51    (13)   28    4    81 
 Net change in AOCI   (323)   (56)   194    28    (1)   (158)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2014 $ (626) $ (54) $ 152  $ (207) $ (16) $ (751)

119

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities FDIC's Share of Unrealized (Gains) Losses on AFS Securities Other, net Total
                   
      (Dollars in millions)
AOCI balance, January 1, 2013 $ (714) $ (173) $ 598  $ (256) $ (14) $ (559)
 OCI before reclassifications, net of tax   354    127    (669)   (18)   (2)   (208)
 Amounts reclassified from AOCI:                  
  Personnel expense   91    ―      ―      ―      ―      91 
  Interest income   ―      ―      97    ―      2    99 
  Interest expense   ―      77    ―      ―      ―      77 
  FDIC loss share income, net   ―      ―      ―      63    ―      63 
  Securities (gains) losses, net   ―      ―      (51)   ―      ―      (51)
   Total before income taxes   91    77    46    63    2    279 
   Less: Income taxes   34    29    17    24    1    105 
    Net of income taxes   57    48    29    39    1    174 
 Net change in AOCI   411    175    (640)   21    (1)   (34)
AOCI balance, December 31, 2013 $ (303) $ 2  $ (42) $ (235) $ (15) $ (593)

NOTE 12. Income Taxes

Effective January 1, 2015, BB&T adopted new guidance related to the accounting for investments in qualified affordable housing projects. For periods prior to January 1, 2015, amortization expense related to qualifying investments in low income housing tax credits was reclassified from other income to provision for income taxes, and the amount of amortization and tax benefits recognized was revised as a result

The components of the adoption of the proportional amortization method.

The components of the income tax provision are as follows:
                
       Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 2013 
                
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Current expense:         
  Federal$ 585  $ 706  $ 1,148  
  State  99    81    98  
 Total current expense  684    787    1,246  
 Deferred expense:         
  Federal  99    122    273  
  State  11    12    34  
 Total deferred expense  110    134    307  
 Provision for income taxes$ 794  $ 921  $ 1,553  

income tax provision are as follows:

  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Current expense:      
Federal $539
 $959
 $585
State 80
 97
 99
Total current expense 619
 1,056
 684
Deferred expense:  
  
  
Federal 253
 (14) 99
State 39
 16
 11
Total deferred expense 292
 2
 110
Provision for income taxes $911
 $1,058
 $794

The reasons for the difference between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes were as follows:

120
TableofContents

       Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 2013 
                   
       (Dollars in millions)  
 Federal income taxes at statutory rate of 35%$ 1,021   $ 1,094   $ 1,149   
 Increase (decrease) in provision for income taxes as a result of:            
  State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  72     61     86   
  Affordable housing projects proportional amortization  181     159     143   
  Affordable housing projects tax credits and other tax benefits  (249)    (221)    (196)  
  Tax exempt income  (129)    (125)    (128)  
  Adjustments for uncertain tax positions  (107)    (39)    516   
  Other, net  5     (8)    (17)  
 Provision for income taxes$ 794   $ 921   $ 1,553   
 Effective income tax rate  27.2 %   29.5 %   47.3 % 

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the table below:
             
       December 31, 
       2015 2014 
             
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Deferred tax assets:      
  ALLL$ 553  $ 556  
  Postretirement plans  431    372  
  Net unrealized loss on AFS securities  124    36  
  Equity-based compensation  129    137  
  Reserves and expense accruals  255    247  
  Investments in qualified affordable housing projects  110    ―    
  Other  292    198  
 Total deferred tax assets  1,894    1,546  
             
 Deferred tax liabilities:      
  Prepaid pension plan expense  509    477  
  MSRs  331    312  
  Lease financing  663    375  
  Loan fees and expenses  70    265  
  Identifiable intangible assets  207    139  
  Derivatives and hedging  77    122  
  Investments in qualified affordable housing projects  ―      25  
  Other  92    93  
 Total deferred tax liabilities  1,949    1,808  
   Net deferred tax liability$ (55) $ (262) 

  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Federal income taxes at statutory rate of 35% $1,164
 $1,225
 $1,021
Increase (decrease) in provision for income taxes as a result of:    
  
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit 77
 73
 72
Affordable housing projects proportional amortization 236
 205
 181
Affordable housing projects tax credits and other tax benefits (319) (279) (249)
Tax exempt income (139) (151) (129)
Federal tax reform impact (43) 
 
Excess tax benefits for equity-based compensation (52) 
 
Adjustments for uncertain tax positions 
 (6) (107)
Other, net (13) (9) 5
Provision for income taxes $911
 $1,058
 $794
Effective income tax rate 27.4% 30.2% 27.2%

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law December 22, 2017. The net tax benefit recognized as a result of the revaluation of deferred taxes and investment in affordable housing projects is presented as Federal tax reform impact in the above table.

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the table below:
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets:    
ALLL $359
 $564
Postretirement plans 311
 451
Net unrealized loss on AFS securities 112
 155
Equity-based compensation 66
 124
Reserves and expense accruals 114
 238
Partnerships 70
 116
Other 160
 317
Total deferred tax assets 1,192
 1,965
Deferred tax liabilities:  
  
Prepaid pension plan expense 436
 558
MSRs 234
 358
Lease financing 366
 587
Loan fees and expenses 114
 103
Identifiable intangible assets 163
 224
Other 31
 45
Total deferred tax liabilities 1,344
 1,875
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $(152) $90

On a periodic basis, BB&T evaluates its income tax positions based on tax laws and regulations and financial reporting considerations, and records adjustments as appropriate. This evaluation takes into consideration the status of current taxing authorities’ examinations of BB&T’s tax returns, recent positions taken by the taxing authorities on similar transactions and the overall tax environment in relation to tax-advantaged transactions. The following table presents changes in unrecognized tax benefits:

121
TableofContents

       As of/ For the Year Ended December 31, 
       2015 2014 2013 
                
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits$ 503  $ 644  $ 297  
  Additions based on tax positions related to current year  ―      1    18  
  Additions (reductions) for tax positions of prior years  (76)   (34)   343  
  Settlements  (1)   (17)   ―    
  Lapse of statute of limitations  (1)   ―      ―    
  Unrecognized deferred tax benefits from acquisitions  1    (91)   (14) 
 Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits$ 426  $ 503  $ 644  
                
 Unrecognized tax benefits that would have impacted effective rate if recognized         
  Federal$ 422  $ 497  $ 631  
  State  3    4    11  
                

  As of/ For the Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits $1
 $426
 $503
Additions based on tax positions related to current year 
 
 
Additions (reductions) for tax positions of prior years 
 (5) (76)
Settlements 
 (420) (1)
Lapse of statute of limitations 
 
 (1)
Unrecognized deferred tax benefits from acquisitions 
 
 1
Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits $1
 $1
 $426
       
Unrecognized tax benefits that would have impacted effective rate if recognized  
  
  
Federal $
 $
 $422
State 1
 1
 3

During 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a portion of an earlier ruling pertaining to the disallowance of foreign tax credits and other deductions claimed by a subsidiary in connection with a financing transaction, which resulted in the recognition of a $107 million income tax benefit. During 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case, which preserved the earlier ruling and effectively concluded this matter.
The Company had $181 million, $210 million and $213 million in liabilitiesimmaterial amounts accrued for tax-related interest and penalties recorded on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015, 2014,2017 and 2013, respectively.2016. The amount of net interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income was a benefit of $29 millionimmaterial for 2015, an immaterial amount for 2014 and expense of $176 million for 2013.

all periods presented. The IRS has completed its Federal income tax examinations of BB&T through 2010.2013. Various years remain subject to examination by state taxing authorities.

In February 2010, BB&T received an IRS statutory notice of deficiency for tax years 2002-2007 asserting a liability for taxes, penalties and interest of approximately $892 million related to the disallowance of foreign tax credits and other deductions claimed by a subsidiary in connection with a financing transaction. BB&T paid the disputed tax, penalties and interest in March 2010 and filed a lawsuit seeking a refund in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. During September 2013, the court denied the refund claim. These developments and other smaller matters resulted in $516 million of income tax adjustments during 2013. BB&T appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. During May 2015, the appeals court overturned a portion of the earlier ruling, resulting in the recognition of a $107 million income tax benefit during the second quarter. The remainder of the decision was affirmed. During September 2015, BB&T filed a petition requesting the case be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. A decision to hear the case has not been made at this time.

It is reasonably possible that the litigation associated with the financing transaction may conclude within the next twelve months; however, it is also possible that the appeals process could take longer than one year. Changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits, penalties and interest could result in a benefit of up to approximately $596 million.


NOTE 13.12. Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

BB&T provides a defined benefit retirement planplans qualified under the IRC that coverscover most employees. Benefits are based on years of service, age at retirement and the employee's compensation during the five highest consecutive years of earnings within the last ten years of employment.

In addition, supplemental retirement benefits are provided to certain key officers under supplemental defined benefit executive retirement plans, which are not qualified under the IRC. Although technically unfunded plans, a Rabbi TrustTrusts and insurance policies on the lives of certain of the covered employees are available to finance future benefits.

The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine net periodic pension costs for the qualified pension plan:
              
     December 31, 
     2015 2014  2013  
 Weighted average assumed discount rate 4.27 %  5.10 %  4.25 % 
 Weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 7.50    7.75    8.00   
 Assumed long-term rate of annual compensation increases 4.50    5.00    4.50   

122

The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine net periodic pension costs for the qualified pension plans:
  December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Weighted average assumed discount rate 4.43% 4.68% 4.27%
Weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 7.00
 7.00
 7.50
Assumed long-term rate of annual compensation increases 4.50
 4.50
 4.50

The weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets represents the average rate of return expected to be earned on plan assets over the period the benefits included in the benefit obligation are to be paid. In developing the expected rate of return, BB&T considers long-term compound annualized returns of historical market data for each asset category, as well as historical actual returns on the plan assets. Using this reference information, the Company develops forward-looking return expectations for each asset category and a weighted average expected long-term rate of return for the plan based on target asset allocations contained in BB&T's Investment Policy Statement. For 2016,2018, the expected rate of return on plan assets is 7.0%.


Financial data relative to qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans is summarized in the following tables for the years indicated. On the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the qualified pension plan prepaid asset is recorded as a component of other assets and the nonqualified pension plans accrued liability is recorded as a component of other liabilities. The data is calculated using an actuarial measurement date of December 31.

      Year Ended December 31, 
      2015  2014  2013  
               
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Net Periodic Pension Cost:         
  Service cost$ 176  $ 138  $ 150  
  Interest cost  157    140    120  
  Estimated return on plan assets  (327)   (296)   (257) 
  Net amortization and other  67    17    91  
   Net periodic benefit cost  73    (1)   104  
               
 Pre-Tax Amounts Recognized in OCI:         
  Net actuarial loss (gain)  230    532    (535) 
  Net amortization  (67)   (17)   (91) 
   Net amount recognized in OCI  163    515    (626) 
    Total net periodic pension costs (income) recognized in         
     total comprehensive income, pre-tax$ 236  $ 514  $ (522) 

The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations: 
            
      December 31, 
      2015  2014  
 Weighted average assumed discount rate4.68 % 4.27 % 
 Assumed rate of annual compensation increases4.50   4.50   

     Qualified Pension Plan Nonqualified Pension Plans 
     Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
     2015  2014  2015  2014  
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year $ 3,227  $ 2,437  $ 367  $ 304  
  Service cost   164    128    12    10  
  Interest cost   141    124    16    16  
  Actuarial (gain) loss   (164)   607    (3)   45  
  Benefits paid   (80)   (69)   (15)   (8) 
  Acquisitions   185    ―      15    ―    
 Projected benefit obligation, end of year $ 3,473  $ 3,227  $ 392  $ 367  
 Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year $ 2,997  $ 2,744  $ 309  $ 295  

123
TableofContents

     Qualified Pension Plan Nonqualified Pension Plans 
     Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
     2015 2014 2015 2014 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $ 4,223  $ 3,733  $ —  $ —  
  Actual return on plan assets   (70)   416    —    —  
  Employer contributions   126    143    15    8  
  Benefits paid   (80)   (69)   (15)   (8) 
  Acquisitions   170    —    —    —  
 Fair value of plan assets, end of year $ 4,369  $ 4,223  $ —  $ —  
 Funded status at end of year $ 896  $ 996  $ (392) $ (367) 

The following are the pre-tax amounts recognized in AOCI:
                 
     Qualified Pension Plan Nonqualified Pension Plans 
     Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31, 
     2015  2014  2015  2014  
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Prior service credit (cost) $ —  $ —  $ (2) $ (2) 
 Net actuarial loss   (1,040)   (859)   (131)   (149) 
  Net amount recognized $ (1,040) $ (859) $ (133) $ (151) 

The following table presents the amount expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost during 2016:
         
   Qualified Nonqualified 
   Pension Plan Pension Plans 
         
   (Dollars in millions) 
 Net actuarial loss$ (66) $ (12) 
  Net amount expected to be amortized in 2016$ (66) $ (12) 

  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Net Periodic Pension Cost:      
Service cost $200
 $186
 $176
Interest cost 192
 181
 157
Estimated return on plan assets (372) (326) (327)
Net amortization and other 75
 80
 67
Net periodic benefit cost 95
 121
 73
Pre-Tax Amounts Recognized in OCI:  
  
  
Prior service credit (cost) 30
 
 
Net actuarial loss (gain) 137
 138
 230
Net amortization (75) (80) (67)
Net amount recognized in OCI 92
 58
 163
Total net periodic pension costs (income) recognized in total comprehensive income, pre-tax $187
 $179
 $236
The following actuarial assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations:
  December 31,
  2017 2016
Weighted average assumed discount rate 3.79% 4.43%
Assumed rate of annual compensation increases 4.50
 4.50
Activity in the projected benefit obligation is presented in the following table:
  Qualified Plan Nonqualified Plans
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year $3,939
 $3,473
 $426
 $392
Service cost 188
 174
 12
 12
Interest cost 173
 163
 19
 18
Actuarial (gain) loss 576
 152
 77
 15
Benefits paid (102) (94) (12) (11)
Plan amendments 165
 
 (135) 
Acquisitions 
 71
 
 
Projected benefit obligation, end of year $4,939
 $3,939
 $387
 $426
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year $4,198
 $3,403
 $288
 $363
Effective December 31, 2017, the qualified defined benefit plan was amended and a portion of the accrued benefits of participants in the nonqualified plan were shifted to the qualified plan. Affected associates continue to participate in the nonqualified plan for benefits earned in 2017 and later. In conjunction with this shift, a minimum benefit was established under the qualified plan.

Activity in plan assets is presented in the following table:
  Qualified Plan Nonqualified Plans
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year $5,044
 $4,369
 $
 $
Actual return on plan assets 888
 356
 
 
Employer contributions 479
 360
 13
 11
Benefits paid (102) (94) (13) (11)
Acquisitions 
 53
 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of year $6,309
 $5,044
 $
 $
Funded status at end of year $1,370
 $1,105
 $(387) $(426)


The following are the pre-tax amounts recognized in AOCI:
  Qualified Plan Nonqualified Plans
  Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Prior service credit (cost) $(165) $
 $134
 $(1)
Net actuarial loss (1,092) (1,095) (198) (135)
Net amount recognized $(1,257) $(1,095) $(64) $(136)
The following table presents the amount expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic pension cost during 2018:
(Dollars in millions) Qualified Plan Nonqualified Plans
Net actuarial loss $(49) $(22)
Prior service credit (cost) (25) $19
Net amount expected to be amortized in 2018 $(74) $(3)

BB&T makes contributions to the qualified pension plan in amounts between the minimum required for funding and the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. BB&T made discretionary contributions of $280$144 million during the first quarter of 2016.2018. Management may make additional contributions in 2016.2018. For the nonqualified plans, the employer contributions are based on benefit payments.

The following table reflects the estimated benefit payments for the periods presented:
        
  Qualified Nonqualified 
  Pension Plan Pension Plans 
        
  (Dollars in millions) 
 2016$ 85  $ 14  
 2017  101    14  
 2018  111    16  
 2019  121    17  
 2020  132    18  
 2021-2025  843    112  

The following table reflects the estimated benefit payments for the periods presented:
(Dollars in millions) Qualified Plan Nonqualified Plans
2018 $114
 $15
2019 125
 15
2020 137
 16
2021 150
 16
2022 164
 17
2023-2027 1,042
 101
BB&T's primary total return objective is to achieve returns that, over the long term, will fund retirement liabilities and provide for the desired plan benefits in a manner that satisfies the fiduciary requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The plan assets have a long-term time horizon that runs concurrent with the average life expectancy of the participants. As such, the Plan can assume a time horizon that extends well beyond a full market cycle, and can assume an above-average level of risk, as measured by the standard deviation of annual return. It is expected, however, that both professional investment management and sufficient portfolio diversification will smooth volatility and help to generate a reasonable consistency of return. The investments are broadly diversified among economic sector, industry, quality and size in order to reduce risk and to produce incremental return. Within approved guidelines and restrictions, investment managers have wide discretion over the timing and selection of individual investments.

124

BB&T periodically reviews its asset allocation and investment policy and makes changes to its target asset allocation. BB&T has established guidelines within each asset category to ensure the appropriate balance of risk and reward. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, the target asset allocations for the plan assets included a range of 30% to 40%50% for U.S. equity securities, 10%11% to 18% for international equity securities, 35% to 50%53% for fixed income securities, and 0% to 12%14% for alternative investments, which include real estate, hedge funds and private equities and commodities, with any remainder to be held in cash equivalents.equities. The plan may hold BB&T common stock up to 10% of its assets subject to the target range for total U.S. equity securities.

in BB&T common stock.

The fair valuevalues of thecertain pension plan assets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 by asset category are reflected in the following tables.

    December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
    Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
                            
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Cash and cash-equivalents$ 266  $ 266  $ —  $ —  $ 66  $ 66  $ —  $ —  
 U.S. equity securities  1,627    1,627    —    —    1,635    1,635    —    —  
 International equity securities  712    614    98    —    657    539    118    —  
 Fixed income securities  1,631    10    1,621    —    1,717    10    1,707    —  
 Alternative investments  115    —    —    115    124    —    —    124  
  Total plan assets$ 4,351  $ 2,517  $ 1,719  $ 115  $ 4,199  $ 2,250  $ 1,825  $ 124  

U.S. equity securities include 3.0 million shares of BB&T common stock valued at $113 million and $117 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. table:

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2
Cash and cash-equivalents $67
 $67
 $
 $179
 $179
 $
U.S. equity securities 2,503
 1,333
 1,170
 1,892
 1,018
 874
International equity securities 1,130
 195
 935
 839
 165
 674
Fixed income securities 2,452
 10
 2,442
 1,914
 10
 1,904
Total $6,152
 $1,605
 $4,547
 $4,824
 $1,372
 $3,452


International equity securities include a common/commingled fund that consists of assets from several accounts, pooled together, to reduce management and administration costs. TotalInvestments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share or equivalent as a practical expedient are not required to be classified in the fair value hierarchy. The pension plan assets exclude accrued income of $18held alternative investments valued using net asset values totaling $105 million and $23$199 million at December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

The following table presents the activity for Level 3 plan assets, all of which are in alternative investments: 
              
     Year Ended December 31, 
     2015 2014 2013 
              
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at beginning of year$ 124  $ 101  $ 98  
  Actual return on plan assets  2    11    11  
  Purchases, sales and settlements, net  (11)   12    (8) 
 Balance at end of year$ 115  $ 124  $ 101  

Defined Contribution Plans

BB&T offers a 401(k) Savings Plan and other defined contribution plans that permit employees to contribute from 1% to 50% of their cash compensation. For full-time employees who are 21 years of age or older with one year or more of service, BB&T makes matching contributions of up to 6% of the employee's compensation. BB&T's contribution toexpense for the 401(k) Savings Plan and nonqualified defined contribution plans totaled $114$133 million, $103$129 million and $102$114 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. BB&T also offers defined contribution plans to certainCertain employees of subsidiaries who do not participate in the 401(k) Savings Plan.

Plan with different matching formulas.

Other Benefits

There are various other employment contracts, deferred compensation arrangements and covenants not to compete with selected members of management and certain retirees. These plans and their obligations are not material to the financial statements.

125

NOTE 14.13. Commitments and Contingencies

BB&T utilizes a variety of financial instruments to meet the financing needs of clients and to reduce exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and financial guarantees and derivatives. BB&T also has commitments to fund certain affordable housing investments and contingent liabilities related to certain sold loans.

Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit are primarily lines of credit to businesses and consumers and have specified rates and maturity dates. Many of these commitments also have adverse change clauses, which allow BB&T to cancel the commitment due to deterioration in the borrowers’ creditworthiness.

     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
          
     (Dollars in millions)
Letters of credit$ 3,033  $ 3,462 
Carrying amount of the liability for letters of credit  27    22 
          
Investments in affordable housing and historic building rehabilitation projects:     
 Carrying amount  1,629    1,436 
 Amount of future funding commitments included in carrying amount  654    459 
 Lending exposure  292    169 
 Tax credits subject to recapture  355    300 
          
Investments in private equity and similar investments  289    329 
Future funding commitments to consolidated private equity funds  231    202 

  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Letters of credit $2,466
 $2,786
Carrying amount of the liability for letters of credit 21
 27
Investments in affordable housing projects:    
Carrying amount 1,948
 1,719
Amount of future funding commitments included in carrying amount 928
 738
Lending exposure 561
 495
Tax credits subject to recapture 471
 413
Private equity investments 471
 417
Future funding commitments to private equity investments 143
 199
Letters of credit and financial guarantees written are unconditional commitments issued by BB&T to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuance, bond financing and similar transactions, the majority of which are to tax exempt entities. The credit risk involved in the issuance of these guarantees is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to clients and as such, the instruments are collateralized when necessary.

BB&T invests in certain affordable housing and historic building rehabilitation projects throughout its market area as a means of supporting local communities. BB&T receives tax credits related to these investments. BB&T typically acts as a limited partner in these investments and does not exert control over the operating or financial policies of the partnerships. BB&T typically provides financing during the construction and development of the properties; however, permanent financing is generally obtained from independent third parties upon completion of a project. Tax credits are subject to recapture by taxing authorities based on compliance features required to be met at the project level. BB&T’s maximum potential exposure to losses relative to investments in VIEs is generally limited to the sum of the outstanding balance, future funding commitments and any related loans to the entity. Loans to these entities are underwritten in substantially the same manner as are other loans and are generally secured.

Effective January 1, 2015, BB&T adopted new guidance related toInvestments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. The following table summarizes the estimated impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income.

       Year Ended December 31, 
       2014 2013 
             
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Increase in other income$ 141  $ 159  
 Increase in provision for income taxes  (161)   (158) 
 Change in net income and net income available to common shareholders$ (20) $ 1  
             
 Decrease in diluted EPS$ (0.03) $ ―    
             
       January 1, 
       2015 2014 
             
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Decrease to retained earnings$ (49) $ (29) 

BB&T has investments in and future funding commitments to certain private equity and similarcertain other equity method investments. The majority of these investments are private equity funds that are consolidated into BB&T’s&T's financial statements. The risk exposure relating to such commitments is generally limited to the amount of investments and future funding commitments made.

126

A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or interest rate. For additional disclosures related to BB&T’s derivatives refer to Note 18 “Derivative Financial Instruments.”


BB&T has sold certain mortgage-related loans that contain recourse provisions. These provisions generally require BB&T to reimburse the investor for a share of any loss that is incurred after the disposal of the property. BB&T also issues standard representations and warranties related to mortgage loan sales to GSEs. Refer to Note 7 “Loan Servicing”"Note 6. Loan Servicing" for additional disclosures related to these exposures.

In the ordinary course of business, BB&T indemnifies its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law against liabilities arising from pending litigation. BB&T also issues standard representations and warranties in underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition agreements, loan sales, brokerage activities and other similar arrangements. Counterparties in many of these indemnification arrangements provide similar indemnifications to BB&T. Although these agreements often do not specify limitations, BB&T does not believe that any payments related to these guarantees would materially change the financial position or results of operations of BB&T.

Legal Proceedings

The nature of BB&T’s business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation, investigations and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. BB&T believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and, with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to management’s judgment as to what is in the best interests of BB&T and its shareholders.

On at least a quarterlyregular basis, liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings are assessed utilizing the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that BB&T will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, a liability is recorded in the consolidated financial statements. These legal reserves may be increased or decreased to reflect any relevant developments on at least a quarterly basis. For other matters, where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss is not estimable, legal reserves are not accrued. While the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, management believes that the established legal reserves are adequate and the liabilities arising from legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows of BB&T.

Pledged Assets

Certain assets were pledged to secure municipal deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings and borrowing capacity, subject to any applicable asset discount, at the FHLB and FRB as well as for other purposes as required or permitted by law. The following table provides the total carrying amount of pledged assets by asset type, of which the majority are pursuant to agreements that do not permit the other party to sell or repledge the collateral. Assets related to employee benefit plans have beenare excluded from the following table.

    December 31, 
    2015 2014 
          
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Pledged securities$ 14,063  $ 14,636  
 Pledged loans  69,070    67,248  

127
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Pledged securities $14,636
 $15,549
Pledged loans 74,718
 75,015

NOTE 15.14. Regulatory Requirements and Other Restrictions

Branch Bank is required by the FRB to maintain reserve balances in the form of vault cash or deposits with the FRB based on specified percentages of certain deposit types, subject to various adjustments. At December 31, 2015,2017, the net reserve requirement was met with vault cash.

Branch Bank is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay. In addition, both BB&T and Branch Bank are subject to various regulatory restrictions relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums, and to remain “well-capitalized”"well-capitalized" under the prompt corrective action regulations. BB&T does not expect that any of these laws, regulations or policies will materially affect the ability of Branch Bank to pay dividends.


BB&T is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory—and possibly additional discretionary—actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated pursuant to regulatory directives. BB&T’s capital amounts and classification also are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. BB&T is in full compliance with these requirements. Banking regulations also identify five capital categories for IDIs: well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, BB&T and Branch Bank were classified as “well-capitalized,”"well-capitalized," and management believes that no events or changes have occurred subsequent to year end that would change this designation.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require BB&T to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total andCET1, Tier 1 capitaland Total Capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average tangible assets (leverage ratio).

Risk-based capital ratios, which include Common Equity Tier 1,CET1, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital, are calculated based on regulatory guidance related to the measurement of capital and risk-weighted assets.

    December 31, 2015 - Basel III December 31, 2014 - Basel I
    Actual Capital Capital Requirements Actual Capital Capital Requirements
    Ratio Amount Minimum Well-Capitalized Ratio Amount Minimum Well-Capitalized
                           
    (Dollars in millions)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital:                        
 BB&T 10.3 % $17,081  $7,497  $10,830  N/A   N/A  N/A  N/A
 Branch Bank 11.3    18,382   7,319   10,572  N/A   N/A  N/A  N/A
Tier 1 Capital:                        
 BB&T 11.8    19,682   9,997   13,329  12.4 % $ 17,840  $ 5,747  $ 8,620 
 Branch Bank 11.3    18,382   9,759   13,012  11.7     16,329    5,591    8,387 
Total Capital:                        
 BB&T 14.3    23,753   13,329   16,661  14.9     21,381    11,494    14,367 
 Branch Bank 13.4    21,859   13,012   16,265  13.4     18,761    11,183    13,979 
Leverage Capital:                        
 BB&T 9.8    19,682   8,062   10,077  9.9     17,840    7,191    8,989 
 Branch Bank 9.3    18,382   7,866   9,833  9.3     16,329    5,265    8,775 

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Actual Capital Capital Requirements Actual Capital Capital Requirements
(Dollars in millions) Ratio Amount Minimum Well-Capitalized Ratio Amount Minimum Well-Capitalized
CET1 Capital:      
          
BB&T Corporation 10.2% $18,051
 $7,975
 $11,519
 10.2% $18,050
 $7,926
 $11,449
Branch Bank 11.3
 19,480
 7,752
 11,197
 11.5
 19,839
 7,730
 11,166
Tier 1 Capital:              
  
BB&T Corporation 11.9
 21,102
 10,633
 14,177
 12.0
 21,102
 10,568
 14,091
Branch Bank 11.3
 19,480
 10,336
 13,781
 11.5
 19,839
 10,307
 13,743
Total Capital:          
  
  
  
BB&T Corporation 13.9
 24,653
 14,177
 17,722
 14.1
 24,872
 14,091
 17,614
Branch Bank 13.3
 22,915
 13,781
 17,226
 13.6
 23,289
 13,743
 17,179
Leverage Capital:          
  
  
  
BB&T Corporation 9.9
 21,102
 8,567
 10,708
 10.0
 21,102
 8,460
 10,576
Branch Bank 9.4
 19,480
 8,315
 10,394
 9.6
 19,839
 8,249
 10,311
As an approved seller/servicer, Branch Bank is required to maintain minimum levels of capital, as specified by various agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, GNMA, FHLMC and FNMA. At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, Branch Bank’s capital was above all required levels.

128


NOTE 16.15. Parent Company Financial Statements

 Parent Company 
 Condensed Balance Sheets 
           
     December 31, 
     2015  2014  
           
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets:      
  Cash and due from banks$ 109  $ 79  
  Interest-bearing deposits with banks  7,383    7,612  
  AFS securities at fair value  124    125  
  HTM securities at amortized cost  3    23  
  Investment in banking subsidiaries  25,823    22,662  
  Investment in other subsidiaries  1,101    1,452  
  Advances to / receivables from banking subsidiaries  ―      63  
  Advances to / receivables from other subsidiaries  3,086    2,430  
  Other assets  211    168  
   Total assets$ 37,840  $ 34,614  
           
 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:      
  Short-term borrowed funds$ 105  $ ―    
  Short-term borrowed funds due to subsidiaries  ―      40  
  Long-term debt  10,274    10,081  
  Accounts payable and other liabilities  121    116  
   Total liabilities  10,500    10,237  
   Total shareholders' equity  27,340    24,377  
   Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$ 37,840  $ 34,614  

129
TableofContents

 Parent Company 
 Condensed Income and Comprehensive Income Statements 
   
    Year Ended December 31, 
    2015  2014  2013  
             
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Income:         
  Dividends from banking subsidiaries$ 1,600  $ 1,636  $ 1,220  
  Dividends from other subsidiaries  411    71    79  
  Interest and other income from subsidiaries  64    67    67  
  Other income  3    7    14  
   Total income  2,078    1,781    1,380  
 Expenses:         
  Interest expense  165    148    219  
  Other expenses  103    55    50  
   Total expenses  268    203    269  
             
 Income before income taxes and equity in         
  undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  1,810    1,578    1,111  
 Income tax benefit  40    43    2  
 Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries  1,850    1,621    1,113  
 Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries in excess of         
  dividends from subsidiaries  273    585    617  
 Net income  2,123    2,206    1,730  
             
 Total OCI  (277)   (158)   (34) 
 Total comprehensive income$ 1,846  $ 2,048  $ 1,696  

130

 Parent Company 
 Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 
   
       Year Ended December 31, 
       2015  2014  2013  
                
       (Dollars in millions) 
 Cash Flows From Operating Activities:         
  Net income$ 2,123  $ 2,206  $ 1,730  
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from         
   operating activities:         
   Equity in earnings of subsidiaries in excess of dividends         
    from subsidiaries  (273)   (585)   (617) 
   Net change in operating assets and liabilities:         
    Other assets  88    27    95  
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (14)   40    42  
   Other, net  32    (86)   (79) 
    Net cash from operating activities  1,956    1,602    1,171  
                
 Cash Flows From Investing Activities:         
  Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of AFS securities  49    25    24  
  Purchases of AFS securities  (21)   (124)   (24) 
  Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities  27    16    2  
  Investment in subsidiaries  ―      (1)   (4) 
  Advances to subsidiaries  (7,461)   (7,145)   (5,815) 
  Proceeds from repayment of advances to subsidiaries  6,848    7,060    5,898  
  Net cash from acquistions and divestitures  (595)   ―      9  
   Net cash from investing activities  (1,153)   (169)   90  
                
 Cash Flows From Financing Activities:         
  Net change in short-term borrowings  (40)   (34)   37  
  Net change in long-term debt  (92)   1,085    499  
  Net proceeds from common stock issued  67    294    108  
  Net proceeds from preferred stock issued  ―      ―      487  
  Cash dividends paid on common and preferred stock  (937)   (814)   (912) 
  Other, net  ―      ―      8  
   Net cash from financing activities  (1,002)   531    227  
                
 Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (199)   1,964    1,488  
 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  7,691    5,727    4,239  
 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$ 7,492  $ 7,691  $ 5,727  

131
Parent Company - Condensed Balance Sheets December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Assets:    
Cash and due from banks $13
 $21
Interest-bearing deposits with banks 6,365
 7,094
AFS securities at fair value 133
 134
HTM securities at amortized cost 1
 1
Advances to / receivables from subsidiaries:    
Banking 2,454
 850
Nonbank 3,664
 2,981
Total advances to / receivables from subsidiaries 6,118
 3,831
Investment in subsidiaries:    
Banking 27,846
 28,444
Nonbank 1,373
 1,279
Total investment in subsidiaries 29,219
 29,723
Other assets 66
 131
Total assets $41,915
 $40,935
     
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:    
Short-term borrowings $7
 $46
Long-term debt 12,042
 10,836
Accounts payable and other liabilities 171
 127
Total liabilities 12,220
 11,009
Total shareholders' equity 29,695
 29,926
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $41,915
 $40,935

Parent Company - Condensed Income and Comprehensive Income Statements Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Income:  
    
Dividends from subsidiaries:      
Banking $1,950
 $1,350
 $1,600
Nonbank 40
 6
 411
Total dividends from subsidiaries 1,990
 1,356
 2,011
Interest and other income from subsidiaries 112
 73
 64
Other income 2
 3
 3
Total income 2,104
 1,432
 2,078
Expenses:  
  
  
Interest expense 227
 160
 165
Other expenses 83
 56
 103
Total expenses 310
 216
 268
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 1,794
 1,216
 1,810
Income tax benefit 63
 38
 40
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries 1,857
 1,254
 1,850
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries in excess of dividends from subsidiaries 558
 1,188
 273
Net income 2,415
 2,442
 2,123
Total OCI (88) (104) (277)
Total comprehensive income $2,327
 $2,338
 $1,846


Parent Company - Statements of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:  
    
Net income $2,415
 $2,442
 $2,123
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:      
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries in excess of dividends from subsidiaries (558) (1,188) (273)
Other, net 
 (14) 35
Net cash from operating activities 1,857
 1,240
 1,885
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:  
  
  
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of AFS securities 29
 27
 49
Purchases of AFS securities (29) (31) (21)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities 
 2
 27
Investment in subsidiaries 1,100
 (85) 17
Advances to subsidiaries (6,958) (7,719) (7,461)
Proceeds from repayment of advances to subsidiaries 4,671
 6,975
 6,831
Net cash from acquisitions and divestitures 
 (254) (595)
Other, net 1
 
 
Net cash from investing activities (1,186) (1,085) (1,153)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:  
  
  
Net change in short-term borrowings (39) (60) 30
Net change in long-term debt 1,319
 465
 (92)
Repurchase of common stock (1,613) (520) 
Net cash from common stock transactions in connection with equity awards 108
 218
 68
Net proceeds from preferred stock issued 
 450
 
Cash dividends paid on common and preferred stock (1,179) (1,092) (937)
Other, net (4) 7
 
Net cash from financing activities (1,408) (532) (931)
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents (737) (377) (199)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 7,115
 7,492
 7,691
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $6,378
 $7,115
 $7,492

The transfer of funds in the form of dividends, loans or advances from bank subsidiaries to the Parent Company is restricted. Federal law requires loans to the Parent Company or its affiliates to be secured and at market terms and generally limits loans to the Parent Company or an individual affiliate to 10% of Branch Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. In the aggregate, loans to the Parent Company and all affiliates cannot exceed 20% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus.

Dividend payments to the Parent Company by Branch Bank are subject to regulatory review and statutory limitations and, in some instances, regulatory approval. In general, dividends from Branch Bank to the Parent Company are limited by rules which compare dividends to net income for regulatory-defined periods. Furthermore, dividends are restricted by regulatory minimum capital constraints.

NOTE 17.16. Fair Value Disclosures

Accounting standards define fair value as the exchange price that would be received on the measurement date to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market available to the entity in an orderly transaction between market participants, with a three level valuation input hierarchy.

The following tables present fair value information for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
                 
 December 31, 2015 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets:             
  Trading securities $ 1,180  $ 311  $ 869  $ ―    
  AFS securities:             
   U.S. Treasury   1,832    ―      1,832    ―    
   GSE   51    ―      51    ―    
   Agency MBS   20,046    ―      20,046    ―    
   States and political subdivisions   2,079    ―      2,079    ―    
   Non-agency MBS   221    ―      221    ―    
   Other   4    4    ―      ―    
   Acquired from FDIC   1,064    ―      438    626  
  LHFS   1,035    ―      1,035    ―    
  Residential MSRs   880    ―      ―      880  
  Derivative assets:             
   Interest rate contracts   964    ―      956    8  
   Foreign exchange contracts   6    ―      6    ―    
  Private equity and similar investments   289    ―      ―      289  
   Total assets $ 29,651  $ 315  $ 27,533  $ 1,803  
                 
 Liabilities:             
  Derivative liabilities:             
   Interest rate contracts $ 788  $ ―    $ 784  $ 4  
   Foreign exchange contracts   4    ―      4    ―    
  Securities sold short   147    ―      147    ―    
   Total liabilities $ 939  $ ―    $ 935  $ 4  

132
 

 December 31, 2014 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
                 
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Assets:             
  Trading securities $ 482  $ 289  $ 193  $ ―    
  AFS securities:             
   U.S. Treasury   1,231    ―��     1,231    ―    
   Agency MBS   16,154    ―      16,154    ―    
   States and political subdivisions   1,974    ―      1,974    ―    
   Non-agency MBS   264    ―      264    ―    
   Other   41    6    35    ―    
   Acquired from FDIC   1,243    ―      498    745  
  LHFS   1,423    ―      1,423    ―    
  Residential MSRs   844    ―      ―      844  
  Derivative assets:             
   Interest rate contracts   1,114    ―      1,094    20  
   Foreign exchange contracts   8    ―      8    ―    
  Private equity and similar investments   329    ―      ―      329  
   Total assets $ 25,107  $ 295  $ 22,874  $ 1,938  
                 
 Liabilities:             
  Derivative liabilities:             
   Interest rate contracts $ 1,007  $ ―    $ 1,004  $ 3  
   Foreign exchange contracts   6    ―      6    ―    
  Securities sold short   148    ―      148    ―    
   Total liabilities $ 1,161  $ ―    $ 1,158  $ 3  


The following tables present fair value information for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
December 31, 2017        
(Dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:  
  
  
  
Trading securities $633
 $363
 $270
 $
AFS securities:  
      
U.S. Treasury 2,291
 
 2,291
 
GSE 179
 
 179
 
Agency MBS 20,101
 
 20,101
 
States and political subdivisions 1,392
 
 1,392
 
Non-agency MBS 576
 
 144
 432
Other 8
 6
 2
 
Total AFS securities 24,547
 6
 24,109
 432
LHFS 1,099
 
 1,099
 
MSRs 1,056
 
 
 1,056
Derivative assets: 

      
Interest rate contracts 440
 
 434
 6
Foreign exchange contracts 3
 
 3
 
Total derivative assets 443
 
 437
 6
Private equity investments 404
 
 
 404
Total assets $28,182
 $369
 $25,915
 $1,898
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
Derivative liabilities:  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts $708
 $
 $705
 $3
Foreign exchange contracts 6
 
 6
 
Total derivative liabilities 714
 
 711
 3
Securities sold short 120
 
 120
 
Total liabilities $834
 $
 $831
 $3
December 31, 2016        
(Dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:  
  
  
  
Trading securities $748
 $324
 $424
 $
AFS securities:  
      
U.S. Treasury 2,587
 
 2,587
 
GSE 180
 
 180
 
Agency MBS 21,264
 
 21,264
 
States and political subdivisions 2,205
 
 2,205
 
Non-agency MBS 679
 
 172
 507
Other 11
 8
 3
 
Total AFS securities 26,926
 8
 26,411
 507
LHFS 1,716
 
 1,716
 
MSRs 1,052
 
 
 1,052
Derivative assets:  
      
Interest rate contracts 814
 
 807
 7
Foreign exchange contracts 8
 
 8
 
Total derivative assets 822
 
 815
 7
Private equity investments 362
 
 
 362
Total assets $31,626
 $332
 $29,366
 $1,928
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
Derivative liabilities:  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts $998
 $
 $978
 $20
Foreign exchange contracts 5
 
 5
 
Total derivative liabilities 1,003
 
 983
 20
Securities sold short 137
 
 137
 
Total liabilities $1,140
 $
 $1,120
 $20

The following discussion focuses on the valuation techniques and significant inputs for Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities.

A third-party pricing service is generally utilized in determining the fair value of the securities portfolio. Management independently evaluates the fair values provided by the pricing service through comparisons to other external pricing sources, review of additional information provided by the pricing service and other third party sources for selected securities and back-testing to compare the price realized on any security sales to the daily pricing information received from the pricing service. Fair value measurements are derived from market-based pricing matrices that were developed using observable inputs that include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, offers, bids, issuer spreads and broker quotes. As described by security type below, additional inputs may be used, or some inputs may not be applicable. In the event that market observable data was not available, which would generally occur due to the lack of an active market for a given security, the valuation of the security would be subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management.

Trading securities: Trading securities include various types of debt and equity securities, primarily consisting of debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, GSEs, or states and political subdivisions. The valuation techniques used for these investments are more fully discussed below.

U.S. Treasury securities: Treasury securities are valued using quoted prices in active over the counter markets.

Agency

GSE securities and agency MBS: GSE pass-through securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that reference observable inputs including benchmark TBA security pricing and yield curves that were estimated based on U.S. Treasury yields and certain floating rate indices. The pricing matrices for these securities may also give consideration to pool-specific data supplied directly by the GSE. GSE CMOs are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

States and political subdivisions: These securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that reference observable inputs including MSRB reported trades, issuer spreads, material event notices and benchmark yield curves.


Non-agency MBS: Pricing matrices for these securities are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

133
Non-agency MBS also include investments in Re-REMIC trusts that primarily hold non-agency MBS, which are valued based on broker pricing models that use baseline securities yields and tranche-level yield adjustments to discount cash flows modeled using market convention prepayment speed and default assumptions.

Other securities: These securities consist primarily of mutual funds and corporate bonds. These securities are valued based on a review of quoted market prices for assets as well as through the various other inputs discussed previously.

Acquired from FDIC securities: Securities acquired from the FDIC consist of re-remic non-agency MBS, municipal securities and non-agency MBS. State and political subdivision securities and certain non-agency MBS acquired from the FDIC are valued in a manner similar to the approach described above for those asset classes. The re-remic non-agency MBS, which are categorized as Level 3, are valued based on broker dealer quotes that reflected certain unobservable market inputs.

LHFS: Certain mortgage loans are originated to be sold to investors, which are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage LHFS.

Residential

MSRs:Residential MSRs are valued using an OAS valuation model to project cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios, which are then discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. Fair value estimates and assumptions are compared to industry surveys, recent market activity, actual portfolio experience and, when available, other observable market data.

Commercial MSRs are valued using a cash flow valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows. BB&T considers actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors that are determined based on current market conditions.

Derivative assets and liabilities: The fair values of derivatives are determined based on quoted market prices and internal pricing models that are primarily sensitive touse market observable data. The fair values of interest rate lock commitments, which are related to mortgage loan commitments and are categorized as Level 3, are based on quoted market prices adjusted for commitments that are not expected to fund and include the value attributable to the net servicing fees.

Private equity and similar investments: Private equity and similar investments are measured at fair value based on the investment’s net asset value. In many cases there are no observable market values for these investments and therefore management must estimate the fair value based on a comparison of the operating performance of the company to multiples in the marketplace for similar entities. This analysis requires significant judgment, and actual values in a sale could differ materially from those estimated.


Securities sold short: Securities sold short represent debt securities sold short that are entered into as a hedging strategy for the purposes of supporting institutional and retail client trading activities.

The following tables presenttable summarizes activity for financial liabilities that are valued using Level 3 inputs:

                Private 
       Acquired       Equity and 
       from FDIC Residential Net Similar 
 Year Ended December 31, 2015 Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments 
              
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at January 1, 2015 $ 745  $ 844  $ 17  $ 329  
  Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):             
   Included in earnings:             
    Interest income   23    ―      ―      ―    
    Mortgage banking income   ―      10    87    ―    
    Other noninterest income   ―      ―      (6)   49  
   Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI   (45)   ―      ―      ―    
  Purchases   ―      ―      1    81  
  Issuances   ―      156    74    ―    
  Sales   ―      ―      ―      (154) 
  Settlements   (97)   (130)   (169)   (16) 
 Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 626  $ 880  $ 4  $ 289  
                   
 Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period,             
  attributable to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2015 $ 23  $ 10  $ 4  $ (2) 

assets and liabilities:
  Non-agency MBS MSRs Net Derivatives Private Equity Investments
(Dollars in millions)    
Balance at January 1, 2015 $745
 $844
 $17
 $329
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):  
  
  
  
Included in earnings (1) 23
 10
 81
 49
Included in unrealized holding gains (losses) in OCI (45) 
 
 
Purchases 
 
 1
 81
Issuances 
 156
 74
 
Sales 
 
 
 (132)
Settlements (97) (130) (169) (38)
Transfers into Level 3 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2015 626
 880
 4
 289
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):  
  
  
  
Included in earnings (1) 25
 63
 97
 20
Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI (45) 
 
 
Purchases 
 
 
 106
Issuances 
 146
 82
 
Sales 
 
 
 (4)
Settlements (99) (160) (196) (49)
Transfers into Level 3 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 
 
 
 
Adoption of fair value option for commercial MSRs 
 123
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2016 507
 1,052
 (13) 362
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):  
  
  
  
Included in earnings (1) 36
 48
 38
 58
Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI (40) 
 
 
Purchases 
 
 
 142
Issuances 
 124
 43
 
Sales 
 
 
 (119)
Settlements (71) (168) (65) (26)
Transfers into Level 3 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 
 
 
 (13)
Balance at December 31, 2017 $432
 $1,056
 $3
 $404
         
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the year attributable to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2017 $35
 $48
 $3
 $12
134
(1)Amounts related to non-agency MBS are included in interest income, amounts related to MSRs and net derivatives are primarily included in mortgage banking income and amounts related to private equity investments are included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

                Private 
       Acquired     Equity and 
       from FDIC Residential Net Similar 
 Year Ended December 31, 2014 Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments 
              
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at January 1, 2014 $ 861  $ 1,047  $ (11) $ 291  
  Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):             
   Included in earnings:             
    Interest income   33    ―      ―      ―    
    Mortgage banking income   ―      (221)   94    ―    
    Other noninterest income   ―      ―      (2)   27  
   Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI   (38)   ―      ―      ―    
  Purchases   ―      ―      ―      67  
  Issuances   ―      141    75    ―    
  Sales   ―      ―      ―      (50) 
  Settlements   (111)   (123)   (139)   (7) 
  Transfers into Level 3   ―      ―      ―      1  
 Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 745  $ 844  $ 17  $ 329  
                   
 Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period,             
  attributable to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2014 $ 33  $ (221) $ 17  $ 15  

             Private 
      Acquired     Equity and 
       from FDIC Residential Net Similar 
 Year Ended December 31, 2013Securities MSRs Derivatives Investments 
              
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Balance at January 1, 2013$ 994  $ 627  $ 54  $ 323  
  Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):            
   Included in earnings:            
    Interest income  37    ―      ―      ―    
    Mortgage banking income  ―      229    21    ―    
    Other noninterest income  ―      ―      ―      33  
   Included in unrealized holding gains (losses) in OCI  (14)   ―      ―      ―    
  Purchases  ―      ―      ―      58  
  Issuances  ―      336    65    ―    
  Sales  ―      ―      ―      (59) 
  Settlements  (156)   (145)   (151)   (64) 
 Balance at December 31, 2013$ 861  $ 1,047  $ (11) $ 291  
                  
 Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period,            
  attributable to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2013$ 37  $ 229  $ (11) $ 22  

BB&T’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels as of the end of a reporting period. Transfers in and out of Level 3 are shown in the preceding tables. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2015, 20142017, 2016 or 2013.

BB&T’s2015.


The non-agency MBS categorized as Level 3 represent ownership interest in various tranches of Re-REMIC trusts. These securities are valued at a discount, which is unobservable in the market, to the fair value of the underlying securities owned by the trusts. The Re-REMIC tranches do not have an active market and therefore are categorized as Level 3. At December 31, 2017, the fair value of the Re-REMIC non-agency MBS represented a discount of 21.1% to the fair value of the underlying securities owned by the Re-REMIC trusts.


The majority of private equity and similar investments are primarily in SBIC qualified funds, which primarily focus on equity and subordinated debt investments in privately-held middle market companies. TheseThe majority of these VIE investments generally are not redeemable and distributions are received as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate. The timing of distributions, which are expected to occur on various dates on an approximately ratable basis through 2026, is uncertain and dependent on various events such as recapitalizations, refinance transactions and ownership changes, among others. Excluding the investment of future funds, BB&T estimates these investments have a weighted average remaining life of approximately two years; however, the timing and amount of distributions may vary significantly. As of December 31, 2015,2017, restrictions on the ability to sell the investments include, but are not limited to, consent of a majority member or general partner approval for transfer of ownership. BB&T’s investments are spread over numerous privately-held middle market companies, and thus the sensitivity to a change in fair value for any single investment is limited. The significant unobservable inputs for these investments are EBITDA multiples that ranged from 5x to 12x,14x, with a weighted average of 8x,9x, at December 31, 2015.

135
2017.

The following table details the fair value and UPB of LHFS that were elected to be carried at fair value:
                       
     December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
     Fair Aggregate   Fair Aggregate   
     Value UPB Difference Value UPB Difference 
                       
     (Dollars in millions) 
 LHFS reported at fair value$ 1,035  $ 1,023  $ 12  $ 1,423  $ 1,390  $ 33  

The following table details the fair value and UPB of LHFS that were elected to be carried at fair value:
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Fair Value Aggregate UPB Difference Fair Value Aggregate UPB Difference
LHFS reported at fair value $1,099
 $1,084
 $15
 $1,716
 $1,736
 $(20)
Excluding government guaranteed, LHFS that were in nonaccrual status or 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest were not material at December 31, 2015.

The following table provides information about certain financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which are primarily collateral dependent and may be subject to liquidity adjustments. The carrying values represent end of period values, which approximate the fair value measurements that occurred on the various measurement dates throughout the period. The valuation adjustments represent the amounts recorded during the period regardless of whether the asset is still held at period end. These assets are considered to be Level 3 assets (excludes PCI).
                
  As Of/ For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
  Carrying Value  Valuation Adjustments Carrying Value  Valuation Adjustments 
                
  (Dollars in millions) 
 Impaired loans$ 149   $ (30) $109   $ (52) 
 Foreclosed real estate  82     (190)  87     (176) 

Refer2017.

The following table provides information about certain financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which are primarily collateral dependent and may be subject to Note 2 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” forliquidity adjustments. The carrying values represent end of period values, which approximate the fair value measurements relatedthat occurred on the various measurement dates throughout the period. The valuation adjustments represent the amounts recorded during the period regardless of whether the asset is still held at period end. These assets are considered to acquisitions.

be Level 3 assets (excludes PCI).

  As Of / For the Year Ended
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Carrying Value Valuation Adjustments Carrying Value Valuation Adjustments
Impaired loans $163
 $(22) $278
 $(89)
Foreclosed real estate 32
 (255) 50
 (221)
For financial instruments not recorded at fair value, estimates of fair value are based on relevant market data and information about the instrument. Values obtained relate to one trading unit without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership, possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs that may result from bulk sales or the relationship between various instruments.

An active market does not exist for certain financial instruments. Fair value estimates for these instruments are based on current economic conditions, currency and interest rate risk characteristics, loss experience and other factors. Many of these estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, the fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. In addition, changes in assumptions could significantly affect these fair value estimates. The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair values.

HTM securities: The fair values of HTM securities are based on a market approach using observable inputs such as benchmark yields and securities, TBA prices, reported trades, issuer spreads, current bids and offers, monthly payment information and collateral performance.

Loans receivable: The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality, which are deemed to be indicative of orderly transactions in the current market. For commercial loans and leases, discount rates may be adjusted to address additional credit risk on lower risk grade instruments. For residential mortgage and other consumer loans, internal prepayment risk models are used to adjust contractual cash flows. Loans are aggregated into pools of similar terms and credit quality and discounted using a LIBOR based rate. The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair values.

FDIC loss share receivable and payable: The fair values of the receivable and payable are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying a risk free interest rate that is adjusted for the uncertainty in the timing and amount of the cash flows. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to loans were estimated using the same assumptions that were used in determining the accounting values for the related loans. The expected cash flows to/from the FDIC related to securities are based upon the fair value of the related securities and the payment that would be required if the securities were sold for that amount. The loss share agreements are not transferrable and, accordingly, there is no market for the receivable or payable.

136

Deposit liabilities: The fair values for demand deposits are equal to the amount payable on demand. Fair values for CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to aggregate expected maturities. BB&T has developed long-term relationships with its deposit customers, commonly referred to as CDIs, that have not been considered in the determination of the deposit liabilities’ fair value.


Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings, excluding securities sold short, approximate their fair values.

Long-term debt: The fair values of long-term debt instruments are estimated based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.

Contractual commitments: The fair values of commitments are estimated using the fees charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The fair values of guarantees and letters of credit are estimated based on the counterparties’ creditworthiness and average default rates for loan products with similar risks. These respective fair value measurements are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Retail lending commitments are assigned no fair value as BB&T typically has the ability to cancel such commitments by providing notice to the borrower.

Financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value are summarized below:
   
     Carrying Total     
 December 31, 2015 Amount Fair Value Level 2 Level 3 
             
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Financial assets:             
  HTM securities $ 18,530  $ 18,519  $ 18,519  $ ―    
  Loans and leases HFI, net of ALLL   134,491    134,728    ―      134,728  
  FDIC loss share receivable   285    11    ―      11  
                 
 Financial liabilities:             
  Deposits   149,124    149,300    149,300    ―    
  FDIC loss share payable   685    676    ―      676  
  Long-term debt   23,769    24,206    24,206    ―    

     Carrying Total     
 December 31, 2014 Amount Fair Value Level 2 Level 3 
             
     (Dollars in millions) 
 Financial assets:             
  HTM securities $ 20,240  $ 20,313  $ 20,313  $ ―    
  Loans and leases HFI, net of ALLL   118,410    118,605    ―      118,605  
  FDIC loss share receivable   534    123    ―      123  
                 
 Financial liabilities:             
  Deposits   129,040    129,259    129,259    ―    
  FDIC loss share payable   697    696    ―      696  
  Long-term debt   23,312    24,063    24,063    ―    

The following is a summary of selected information pertaining to off-balance sheet financial instruments:
                
    December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
    Notional/   Notional/   
    Contract   Contract   
   Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value 
            
    (Dollars in millions) 
 Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit $ 59,019  $ 253  $ 49,333  $ 238  
 Residential mortgage loans sold with recourse   702    8    667    9  
 Other loans sold with recourse   4,198    7    4,264    7  
 Letters of credit   3,033    27    3,462    22  

137

Financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value are summarized below:
December 31, 2017 Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 2 Level 3
(Dollars in millions)    
Financial assets:        
HTM securities $23,027
 $22,837
 $22,837
 $
Loans and leases HFI, net of ALLL 142,211
 141,664
 
 141,664
Financial liabilities:  
    
  
Deposits 157,371
 157,466
 157,466
 
Long-term debt 23,648
 23,885
 23,885
 
December 31, 2016 Carrying Amount Total Fair Value Level 2 Level 3
(Dollars in millions)    
Financial assets:        
HTM securities $16,680
 $16,546
 $16,546
 $
Loans and leases HFI, net of ALLL 141,833
 142,044
 
 142,044
Financial liabilities:  
    
  
Deposits 160,234
 160,403
 160,403
 
Long-term debt 21,965
 22,423
 22,423
 
The following is a summary of selected information pertaining to off-balance sheet financial instruments:
  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(Dollars in millions) Notional/Contract Amount Fair Value Notional/Contract Amount Fair Value
Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit $67,860
 $259
 $64,395
 $250
Residential mortgage loans sold with recourse 490
 5
 578
 7
Other loans sold with recourse 4,153
 5
 4,240
 7
Letters of credit 2,466
 21
 2,786
 27


NOTE 18.17. Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative Classifications and Hedging Relationships
                         
        December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
      Hedged Item or Notional Fair Value Notional Fair Value
      Transaction Amount Gain Loss Amount Gain Loss
                         
        (Dollars in millions)
Cash flow hedges:                   
 Interest rate contracts:                   
  Pay fixed swaps3 mo. LIBOR funding $ 9,300  $ ―    $ (214) $ 9,300  $ ―    $ (289)
                         
Fair value hedges:                   
 Interest rate contracts:                   
  Receive fixed swapsLong-term debt   13,092    329    (1)   11,902    269    (5)
  Pay fixed swapsCommercial loans   207    ―      (2)   161    ―      (3)
  Pay fixed swapsMunicipal securities   244    ―      (94)   336    ―      (126)
    Total    13,543    329    (97)   12,399    269    (134)
                         
Not designated as hedges:                   
 Client-related and other risk management:                   
  Interest rate contracts:                   
   Receive fixed swaps    8,827    337    (1)   7,995    350    (3)
   Pay fixed swaps    8,984    1    (363)   8,163    1    (375)
   Other swaps    1,005    3    (6)   1,372    5    (7)
   Other    601    1    (2)   528    1    (1)
   Forward commitments    4,403    5    (4)   5,326    10    (12)
  Foreign exchange contracts    513    6    (4)   571    8    (6)
    Total    24,333    353    (380)   23,955    375    (404)
                         
 Mortgage banking:                   
  Interest rate contracts:                   
   Interest rate lock commitments    1,828    8    (4)   1,566    20    ―   
   When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward                  
    commitments   2,725    9    (5)   2,623    3    (25)
   Other    677    4    ―      916    7    ―   
    Total    5,230    21    (9)   5,105    30    (25)
                         
 MSRs:                   
  Interest rate contracts:                   
   Receive fixed swaps    2,343    79    (7)   4,119    215    (1)
   Pay fixed swaps    2,329    4    (56)   4,362    1    (124)
   Option trades    7,765    184    (24)   9,350    229    (36)
   When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward                  
    commitments   2,682    ―      (5)   3,731    3    ―   
    Total    15,119    267    (92)   21,562    448    (161)
     Total derivatives not designated as hedges   44,682    641    (481)   50,622    853    (590)
Total derivatives $ 67,525    970    (792) $ 72,321    1,122    (1,013)
                         
Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:                  
 Amounts subject to master netting arrangements not offset due to policy election   (391)   391       (629)   629 
 Cash collateral (received) posted      (283)   368       (190)   342 
  Net amount    $ 296  $ (33)    $ 303  $ (42)

138

The following table presents the notional amount and estimated fair value of derivative instruments:
    December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
    Notional Amount Fair Value Notional Amount Fair Value
(Dollars in millions) Hedged Item or Transaction  Gain Loss  Gain Loss
Cash flow hedges:              
Interest rate contracts:              
Pay fixed swaps 3 mo. LIBOR funding $6,500
 $
 $(126) $7,050
 $
 $(187)
Fair value hedges:          
  
  
Interest rate contracts:          
  
  
Receive fixed swaps Long-term debt 15,538
 118
 (166) 12,099
 202
 (100)
Options Long-term debt 6,087
 
 (1) 2,790
 
 (1)
Pay fixed swaps Commercial loans 416
 5
 (1) 346
 4
 (2)
Pay fixed swaps Municipal securities 231
 
 (76) 231
 
 (83)
Total   22,272
 123
 (244) 15,466
 206
 (186)
Not designated as hedges:    
  
  
  
  
  
Client-related and other risk management:  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts:    
  
  
  
  
  
Receive fixed swaps   10,880
 141
 (61) 9,989
 235
 (44)
Pay fixed swaps   10,962
 59
 (155) 10,263
 43
 (252)
Other swaps   936
 2
 (2) 1,086
 2
 (5)
Other   722
 2
 (2) 709
 2
 (2)
Forward commitments   3,549
 3
 (2) 5,972
 29
 (28)
Foreign exchange contracts 470
 3
 (6) 669
 8
 (5)
Total   27,519
 210
 (228) 28,688
 319
 (336)
Mortgage banking:    
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts:    
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate lock commitments 1,308
 7
 (3) 2,219
 7
 (20)
When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward commitments 3,124
 4
 (3) 6,683
 51
 (14)
Other   182
 1
 
 449
 2
 (1)
Total   4,614
 12
 (6) 9,351
 60
 (35)
MSRs:    
  
  
  
  
  
Interest rate contracts:    
  
  
  
  
  
Receive fixed swaps   4,498
 15
 (86) 5,034
 18
 (236)
Pay fixed swaps   3,418
 32
 (13) 3,768
 56
 (7)
Options   4,535
 50
 (11) 5,710
 160
 (8)
When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward commitments 1,813
 1
 
 3,210
 3
 (8)
Other   3
 
 
 
 
 
Total   14,267
 98
 (110) 17,722
 237
 (259)
Total derivatives not designated as hedges 46,400
 320
 (344) 55,761
 616
 (630)
Total derivatives   $75,172
 443
 (714) $78,277
 822
 (1,003)
Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:   
  
    
  
Amounts subject to master netting arrangements not offset due to policy election   (297) 297
   (443) 443
Cash collateral (received) posted  
 (20) 344
  
 (119) 450
Net amount    
 $126
 $(73)  
 $260
 $(110)


The fair values of derivatives in a gain or loss position are presented on a gross basis in other assets or other liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral posted for derivatives in a loss position is reported as restricted cash. Derivatives with dealer counterparties at both the bank and the parent company are governed by the terms of ISDA Master netting agreements and Credit Support Annexes. The ISDA Master agreements allow counterparties to offset trades in a gain against trades in a loss to determine net exposure and allows for the right of setoff in the event of either a default or an additional termination event. Credit Support Annexes govern the terms of daily collateral posting practices. Collateral practices mitigate the potential loss impact to affected parties by requiring liquid collateral to be posted on a scheduled basis to secure the aggregate net unsecured exposure. In addition to collateral, the right of setoff allows counterparties to offset net derivative values with a defaulting party against certain other contractual receivables from or obligations due to the defaulting party in determining the net termination amount.

No portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated as hedges has been excluded from effectiveness testing. The ineffective portion was immaterial for all periods presented.

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Year Ended December 31,
                           
        Effective Portion   
        Pre-tax Gain (Loss) Location of Pre-tax Gain (Loss) Reclassified
        Recognized in OCI Amounts Reclassified from AOCI into Income
        2015 2014  2013  from AOCI into Income 2015 2014  2013 
                           
         (Dollars in millions)
Cash Flow Hedges:                   
 Interest rate contracts$ (130) $ (172) $ 204  Total interest income $ ―    $ ―    $ ―   
                 Total interest expense   (83)   (82)   (77)
                   $ (83) $ (82) $ (77)
                           
                   Pre-tax Gain (Loss)
                 Location of Amounts Recognized in Income
                 Recognized in Income 2015 2014  2013 
                           
                  (Dollars in millions)
Fair Value Hedges:                   
 Interest rate contracts         Total interest income $ (20) $ (22) $ (21)
                 Total interest expense   279    233    141 
              $ 259  $ 211  $ 120 
Not Designated as Hedges:                 
 Client-related and other risk management:           
   Interest rate contracts       Other income $ 27  $ 18  $ 26 
   Foreign exchange contracts Other income   21    16    11 
 Mortgage Banking:                 
  Interest rate contracts       Mortgage banking income   7    (16)   (27)
 MSRs:                 
  Interest rate contracts       Mortgage banking income   32    251    (197)
              $ 87  $ 269  $ (187)

139
The following table presents the effect of hedging derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of income:
TableofContents

  Effective Portion
Year Ended December 31 Pre-tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI Location of Amounts Reclassified from AOCI into Income Pre-tax Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015  2017 2016 2015
Cash Flow Hedges:              
Interest rate contracts $10
 $(24) $(130) Total interest expense $(15) $(11) $(83)
           
        Location of Amounts Recognized in Income Pre-tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
         2017 2016 2015
          (Dollars in millions)
Fair Value Hedges:              
Interest rate contracts       Total interest income $(19) $(18) $(20)
Interest rate contracts       Total interest expense 148
 226
 279
Total         $129
 $208
 $259
Not Designated as Hedges:          
  
  
Client-related and other risk management:      
  
  
Interest rate contracts       Other income $50
 $52
 $27
Foreign exchange contracts     Other income 1
 11
 21
Mortgage Banking:            
  
Interest rate contracts       Mortgage banking income (12) 8
 7
MSRs:            
  
Interest rate contracts       Mortgage banking income 
 31
 32
Total         $39
 $102
 $87


The following table provides a summary of derivative strategies and the related accounting treatment:
  Cash Flow Hedges Fair Value Hedges 
Cash Flow HedgesFair Value HedgesDerivatives Not Designated as Hedges
Risk exposure Variability in cash flows of interest payments on floating rate business loans, overnight funding and various LIBOR funding instruments. Losses in value on fixed rate long-term debt, CDs, FHLB advances, loans and state and political subdivision securities due to changes in interest rates. Risk associated with an asset or liability, including mortgage banking operations and MSRs, or for client needs. Includes exposure to changes in market rates and conditions subsequent to the interest rate lock and funding date for mortgage loans originated for sale.
Risk management objective Hedge the variability in the interest payments and receipts on future cash flows for forecasted transactions related to the first unhedged payments and receipts of variable interest. Convert the fixed rate paid or received to a floating rate, primarily through the use of swaps. For interest rate lock commitment derivatives and LHFS, use mortgage-based derivatives such as forward commitments and options to mitigate market risk. For MSRs, mitigate the income statement effect of changes in the fair value of the MSRs.
Treatment for portion that is highly effective Recognized in AOCI until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings. Recognized in current period income along with the corresponding changes in the fair value of the designated hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. Entire change in fair value recognized in current period income.
Treatment for portion that is ineffective Recognized in current period income. Recognized in current period income. Not applicable
Treatment if hedge ceases to be highly effective or is terminated Hedge is dedesignated. Effective changes in value that are recorded in AOCI before dedesignation are amortized to yield over the period the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings. If hedged item remains outstanding, termination proceeds are included in cash flows from financing activitiesterminations are reported in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged item and effective changes in value are reflected as part of the carrying value of the financial instrument and amortized to earnings over its estimated remaining life. Not applicable
Treatment if transaction is no longer probable of occurring during forecast period or within a short period thereafter Hedge accounting is ceased and any gain or loss in AOCI is reported in earnings immediately. Not applicable Not applicable

140

The following table presents information about BB&T's cash flow and fair value hedges:
              
      December 31, 
       2015  2014 
              
      (Dollars in millions) 
 Cash flow hedges:         
  Net unrecognized after-tax loss on active hedges recorded in AOCI $ (134)  $ (181)  
  Net unrecognized after-tax gain on terminated hedges recorded in AOCI         
   (to be recognized in earnings through 2022)   50     127   
  Estimated portion of net after-tax loss on active and terminated hedges         
   to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next 12 months   (7)    (51)  
  Maximum time period over which BB&T has hedged a portion of the variability         
   in future cash flows for forecasted transactions excluding those transactions relating to the payment of variable interest on existing instruments   7 yrs   8 yrs 
              
 Fair value hedges:         
  Unrecognized pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges (to be recognized         
   as interest primarily through 2019) $ 138   $ 227   
  Portion of pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges to be recognized as a change         
   in interest during the next 12 months    57     88   

The following table presents information about BB&T's cash flow and fair value hedges:
  December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016
Cash flow hedges:     
 
Net unrecognized after-tax loss on active hedges recorded in AOCI $(96)  $(118) 
Net unrecognized after-tax gain on terminated hedges recorded in AOCI (to be recognized in earnings through 2022) 3
  26
 
Estimated portion of net after-tax loss on active and terminated hedges to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next 12 months (25)  (4) 
Maximum time period over which BB&T has hedged a portion of the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions excluding those transactions relating to the payment of variable interest on existing instruments 5
yrs 6
yrs
Fair value hedges:     
 
Unrecognized pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges (to be recognized as interest primarily through 2019) $129
  $169
 
Portion of pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges to be recognized as a change in interest during the next 12 months 49
  56
 

Derivatives Credit Risk – Dealer Counterparties

Credit risk related to derivatives arises when amounts receivable from a counterparty exceed those payable to the same counterparty. The risk of loss is addressed by subjecting dealer counterparties to credit reviews and approvals similar to those used in making loans or other extensions of credit and by requiring collateral. Dealer counterparties operate under agreements to provide cash and/or liquid collateral when unsecured loss positions exceed negotiated limits.

Derivative contracts with dealer counterparties settle on a monthly, quarterly or semiannual basis, with daily movement of collateral between counterparties required within established netting agreements. BB&T only transacts with dealer counterparties with strong credit standings.

Derivatives Credit Risk – Central Clearing Parties

Certain derivatives are cleared through central clearing parties that require initial margin collateral, as well as collateral for trades in a net loss position. Initial margin collateral requirements are established by central clearing parties on varying bases, with such amounts generally designed to offset the risk of non-payment. Initial margin is generally calculated by applying the maximum loss experienced in value over a specified time horizon to the portfolio of existing trades. The central clearing party used for TBA transactions does not post variation margin to the bank.

           December 31, 
          2015  2014 
                 
           (Dollars in millions) 
 Dealer Counterparties:       
  Cash collateral received from dealer counterparties $ 283  $ 191  
  Derivatives in a net gain position secured by that collateral   301    201  
  Unsecured positions in a net gain with dealer counterparties after collateral postings   18    10  
                
  Cash collateral posted to dealer counterparties   156    227  
  Derivatives in a net loss position secured by that collateral   161    231  
  Additional collateral that would have been posted had BB&T's credit ratings       
   dropped below investment grade   6    3  
                 
 Central Clearing Parties:       
  Cash collateral, including initial margin, posted to central clearing parties   223    114  
  Derivatives in a net loss position secured by that collateral   227    129  
  Securities pledged to central clearing parties   207    116  

141
 December 31,
(Dollars in millions)2017 2016
Dealer Counterparties:   
Cash collateral received from dealer counterparties$21
 $123
Derivatives in a net gain position secured by collateral received22
 123
Unsecured positions in a net gain with dealer counterparties after collateral postings2
 4
Cash collateral posted to dealer counterparties172
 138
Derivatives in a net loss position secured by collateral posted171
 144
Additional collateral that would have been posted had BB&T's credit ratings dropped below investment grade
 8
Central Clearing Parties:   
Cash collateral, including initial margin, posted to central clearing parties177
 313
Derivatives in a net loss position secured by that collateral176
 318
Securities pledged to central clearing parties91
 119


NOTE 19.18. Computation of EPS

Basic and diluted EPS calculations are presented in the following table:
           
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2015 2014  2013  
           
  (Dollars in millions, except per share data, 
  shares in thousands) 
 Net income available to common shareholders$ 1,936  $ 1,983  $ 1,563  
           
 Weighted average number of common shares  748,010    718,140    703,042  
 Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based awards  9,755    10,232    11,321  
 Weighted average number of diluted common shares  757,765    728,372    714,363  
           
 Basic EPS$ 2.59  $ 2.76  $ 2.22  
           
 Diluted EPS$ 2.56  $ 2.72  $ 2.19  
           
 Anti-dilutive equity-based awards  8,620    14,333    28,456  

Basic and diluted EPS calculations are presented in the following table:
  Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands) 2017 2016 2015
Net income available to common shareholders $2,220
 $2,259
 $1,936
       
Weighted average number of common shares 799,217
 804,680
 748,010
Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based awards 11,760
 10,236
 9,755
Weighted average number of diluted common shares 810,977
 814,916
 757,765
       
Basic EPS $2.78
 $2.81
 $2.59
Diluted EPS $2.74
 $2.77
 $2.56
       
Anti-dilutive awards 210
 5,609
 8,620
NOTE 20.19. Operating Segments

BB&T's&T previously reported its results of operations through the following business segments: Community Banking, Residential Mortgage Banking, Dealer Financial Services, Specialized Lending, Insurance Holdings and Financial Services, with the remaining operations recorded in OT&C. In the fourth quarter of 2017, BB&T revised its management structure and changed its basis of presentation into four new business segments: CB-Retail, CB-Commercial, IH&PF and FS&CF, with the remaining operations recorded in OT&C.

The new business segment structure aligns with how BB&T’s management reviews performance and makes decisions by client, segment and business unit. The CB-Retail segment brings together the existing Community Banking retail services and operations with the BUs and subsidiaries that primarily serve retail clients, including the former Residential Mortgage Banking, and portions of both Dealer Financial Services and Specialized Lending segments. The services and operations that support large, medium and small business clients from the prior Community Banking and Dealer Financial Services are divided into six reportable business segments thatincluded in the CB-Commercial segment. The FS&CF segment combines the previous Financial Services operations with the Equipment Finance, Governmental Finance and Grandbridge businesses from the former Specialized Lending segment as those businesses are national in scope consistent with the Capital Markets Corporate Banking Division. The IH&PF received the Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation from the former Specialized Lending segment as it finances insurance premiums. Prior periods have been identified based on BB&T’s organizational structure.revised to reflect the restructuring. The segments require unique technology and marketing strategies and offer different products and services through a number of distinctdistinctly branded LOBs.BUs. In addition, there is an OT&C segment. While BB&T is managed as an integrated organization, individual executive managers are held accountable for the operations of these business segments.


Also during 2017, a change was made in the method for allocation of capital to the operating segments impacting both the allocated balances and funding credit, resulting primarily in an increase to net interest income in the CB-Retail segment, offset by the OT&C segment. Results for prior periods have been revised to reflect the changes in allocation methodology, which are not considered significant to other segments.

BB&T emphasizes revenue growth by focusing on client service, sales effectiveness and relationship management along with an organizational focus on referring clients between LOBs.BUs. The business objective is to provide BB&T’s entire suite of products to our clients with the end goal of providing our clients the best financial experience in the marketplace. The segment results contained herein are presented based on internal management accounting policiesmethodologies that were designed to support these strategic objectives. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP. The performance of the segments is not comparable with BB&T’s consolidated results or with similar information presented by any other financial institution. Additionally, because of the interrelationships of the various segments, the information presented is not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities.



The management accounting process uses various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the operating segments. To determine financial performance for each segment, BB&T allocates capital, funding charges and credits, provisions for loan and leasecredit losses, certain noninterest expenses and income tax provisions to each segment, as applicable. To promote revenue growth, certain revenues are reflected in noninterest income in the individual segment results and also allocated to Community BankingCB-Retail, CB-Commercial and Financial Services.FS&CF. These allocated revenues are reflected in intersegmentas net referral fees in non-interest income and eliminated in Other, Treasury and Corporate.OT&C. Additionally, certain client groups of Community BankingCB-Retail and CB-Commercial have also been identified as clients of other BUs within the business segments. Periodically, existing clients within the Community BankingCB-Retail segment may be identified and assigned as wealth and private banking clients. At theWealth Division clients, at which time, of identification, these clients’ loan and deposit balances are reported in the Financial Services segment from the time of assignment forward.FS&CF segment. The net interest income and associatedrelated net FTP associated with these customers’ loans and deposits isare accounted for in Community BankingCB-Retail in the respective line categories of net interest income (expense) and net intersegment interest income (expense). For Commercial Finance and the Wealth Division, NIM and net intersegment interest income have been combined in the net intersegment interest income (expense) line with an appropriate offsetting amount to the Other, Treasury and CorporateOT&C line item to ensure consolidated totals reflect the Company’s total NIM for loans and deposits. Allocation methodologies are subject to periodic adjustment as the internal management accounting system is revised and business or product lines within the segments change. Also, because the development and application of these methodologies is a dynamic process, the financial results presented may be periodically revised.


BB&T utilizes an FTP system to eliminate the effect of interest rate risk from the segments’ net interest income because such risk is centrally managed within the Treasury function. The FTP system credits or charges the segments with the economic value or cost of the funds the segments create or use. The net FTP credit or charge, which includes intercompany interest income and expense, is reflected as net intersegment interest income (expense) in the accompanying tables.

142

The allocated provision for loan and leasecredit losses is also allocated to the relevant segments based on management’s assessment of the segments’ credit risks. The allocated provision is designed to achieve a high degree of correlation between the loan loss experience and the GAAP basis provision at the segment level, while at the same time providing management with a measure of operating performance that gives appropriate consideration to the risks inherent in each of the Company’s operating segments. Any over or under allocated provision for loan and leasecredit losses is reflected in Other, Treasury and CorporateOT&C to arrive at consolidated results.

BB&T allocates expenses to the reportable segments based on various methodologies, including volume and amount of loans and deposits and the number of full-time equivalent employees. Allocation systems are refined from time to time along with further identification of certain cost pools. These cost pools and refinements are implemented to provide for improved managerial reporting of cost to the appropriate business segments. A portion of corporate overhead expense is not allocated, but is retained in corporate accounts and reflected as Other, Treasury and CorporateOT&C in the accompanying tables. The majority of depreciation expense is recorded in support units and allocated to the segments as part of allocated corporate expense. Income taxes are allocated to the various segments based on taxable income and statutory rates applicable to the segment.

Community Banking

Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance

CB-Retail serves individual and businessretail clients by offering a variety of loan and deposit products, payment services, bankcard products and other financial services. Community Banking is primarily responsible for serving client relationshipsservices by connecting clients to a wide range of financial products and therefore, is credited with certain revenue from theservices.

CB-Retail includes Residential Mortgage Banking, Financial Services, Insurance Services, Specialized Lending, and other segments, which is reflected in net referral fees.

Residential Mortgage Banking

Residential Mortgage Banking retains and services mortgage loans originated by Community BankingBB&T as well as those purchased from various correspondent originators. Mortgage loan products include fixed and adjustable rate government and conventional loans used for the purpose of constructing, purchasing or refinancing residential properties. Substantially all of the properties are owner occupied. BB&T generally retains the servicing rights to loans sold. Residential Mortgage Banking earns interest on loans held in the warehouse and portfolio, earns fee income from the origination and servicing of mortgage loans and recognizes gains or losses from the sale of mortgage loans.

Residential Mortgage Banking also includes Mortgage Warehouse Lending, which provides short-term lending solutions to finance first-lien residential mortgage LHFS by independent mortgage companies.


CB-Retail also includes Dealer FinancialRetail Services

Dealer Financial Services which originates loans to consumers on a prime and nonprime basis for the purchase of automobiles. Such loans are originated on an indirect basis through approved franchised and independent automobile dealers throughout the BB&T market area and nationally through Regional Acceptance Corporation. This segment alsoAdditionally, CB-Retail originates loans for the purchase of boats and recreational vehicles originated through dealers in BB&T’s market area. In addition, financing and servicing to dealers for their inventories


CB-Retail includes Sheffield Financial which is provided through a joint relationship between Dealer Financial Services and Community Banking.

Specialized Lending

Specialized Lending consists of BUs and subsidiariesBU that provideprovides specialty finance products to consumers and businesses. The BUs includeconsumers; as well as BB&T Commercial Finance and Governmental Finance. Commercial Finance structures and manages asset-based working capital financing, supply chain financing, export-import finance, accounts receivable management and credit enhancement. Commercial Finance also contains the Mortgage Warehouse Lending business,Equipment Capital, which is an operating subsidiary that provides short-term lending solutions to finance first-lien residential mortgage LHFS by independent mortgage companies. Governmental Finance provides tax-exempt financing to meet the capital project needs of local governments. Operating subsidiaries include BB&T Equipment Finance, which providesmid-market equipment leasing largelyprimarily within BB&T’s banking footprint; Sheffield Financial, a dealer-based financer of equipmentfootprint.


CB-Retail is primarily responsible for both small businessesserving individual client relationships and, consumers; Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation, which includes AFCOtherefore, is credited with certain revenue from IH&PF and CAFO, insurance premium finance BUs that provide funding to businesses in the United States and Canada and to consumers in certain markets within BB&T’s banking footprint; and Grandbridge, a full-service commercial mortgage banking lender providing loans on a national basis. Lendmark Financial Services, a direct consumer finance lending company, was sold during 2013. Branch Bank clients as well as nonbank clients within and outside BB&T’s primary geographic market area are served by these LOBs. The Community Banking segment receives credit for referrals to these LOBs with the corresponding charge retained as part of Other, Treasury and Corporate in the accompanying tables.

143

Insurance Services

BB&T's insurance agency / brokerage network is the sixth largest in the world. Insurance Services provides property and casualty, employee benefits and life insurance to businesses and individuals. It also provides small business and corporate services, such as workers compensation and professional liability, as well as surety coverage and title insurance. Community Banking and Financial Services receive credit for insurance commissions on referred accounts, with the corresponding charge retained in the corporate office,FS&CF, which is reflected as partin noninterest income.



Community Banking Commercial

CB-Commercial serves large, medium and small business clients by offering a variety of Other, Treasuryloan and Corporatedeposit products and connecting the client with the combined organization’s broad array of financial services. CB-Commercial includes commercial real estate lending, commercial and industrial lending, corporate banking, asset based-lending, dealer inventory financing, tax exempt financing, cash management and treasury services, and commercial deposit products.

CB-Commercial is primarily responsible for serving commercial client relationships and, therefore, is credited with certain revenue from CB-Retail, IH&PF and FS&CF, which is reflected in the accompanying tables.

noninterest income.


Financial Services

Financial Services and Commercial Finance

FS&CF provides personal trust administration, estate planning, investment counseling, wealth management, asset management, corporate retirement services, capital markets and corporate banking andservices, corporate trust services. Financial Services also offers clients investment alternatives, including discount brokerage services equities, fixed-rate and variable-rate annuities, mutual funds and governmental and municipal bonds through BB&T Investment Services, Inc.

Financial Servicesspecialty finance products to businesses.

FS&CF includes BB&T Securities, a full-service brokerage and investment banking firm that provides services in retail brokerage, equity and debt underwriting and investment advice corporate finance and equity research and facilitates the origination, trading and distribution of fixed-income securities and equity products in both the public and private capital markets. BB&T Securities also has a public finance department that provides investment banking services, financial advisory services and municipal bond financing to a variety of regional taxable and tax-exempt issuers.

Financial Services includes a group of consolidated SBIC private equity FS&CF also offers clients investment alternatives, including discount brokerage services, equities, fixed-rate and mezzanine investmentvariable-rate annuities, mutual funds that invest in privately owned middle-market operating companies to facilitate growth or ownership transition. Financial Servicesand governmental and municipal bonds.

FS&CF also includes specialty finance offered through two operating subsidiaries and a BU. Operating subsidiaries include Grandbridge, a full-service commercial mortgage banking lender providing loans on a national basis, and BB&T Equipment Finance, which provides equipment leasing for large and middle market clients. The BU is Governmental Finance which provides tax-exempt financing to meet the capital project needs of local governments. Branch Bank clients as well as nonbank clients within and outside BB&T’s primary geographic market area are served by these subsidiaries and the BU.

In addition, FS&CF includes the Capital Markets Corporate Banking Division that originates and services large corporate relationships, syndicated lending relationships and client derivatives. Community Banking receives

CB-Retail and CB-Commercial receive an interoffice credit for referral fees,referrals to FS&CF, with the corresponding charge reflectedretained as part of Other, Treasury and CorporateOT&C in the accompanying tables. Also captured within the net intersegment interest income for Financial ServicesFS&CF is the NIM for the loans and deposits associated with client relationships assigned to the Wealth Management Division that are housed in CB-Retail.

Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance
BB&T's insurance agency / brokerage network is the Community Bank.

fifth largest in the world. IH&PF provides property and casualty, employee benefits and life insurance to businesses and individuals. It also provides small business and corporate services, such as workers compensation and professional liability, as well as surety coverage and title insurance.


IH&PF also includes Prime Rate Premium Finance Corporation, which includes AFCO and CAFO, insurance premium finance subsidiaries that provide funding to businesses in the United States and Canada.

CB-Retail, CB-Commercial and FS&CF segments receive credit for insurance commissions and referrals to IH&PF with the corresponding charge retained as part of OT&C in the accompanying tables.
Other, Treasury and& Corporate

Other, Treasury and Corporate

OT&C is the combination of the Other segment that represents operating entities that do not meet the quantitative or qualitative thresholds for disclosure; BB&T’s Treasury function, which is responsible for the management of the securities portfolios, overall balance sheet funding and liquidity, and overall management of interest rate risk; the corporate support functions that have not been allocated to the business segments; certain merger-related charges or credits that are incurred as part of the acquisition and conversion of acquired entities; nonrecurringcertain charges that are considered to be unusual in nature or infrequent and not reflective of the normal operations of the segments; and intercompany eliminations including intersegment net referral fees in noninterest income and net intersegment interest income (expense).

The loan portfolio acquired in the Colonial acquisition is managed outside of the Community Banking segment. The assets and related interest income from this loan portfolio have an expected finite business life and are therefore included in the Other, Treasury and Corporate segment.


The investment balances and results related to affordable housing investments are included in the OT&C segment. Additionally, OT&C includes a group of consolidated SBIC private equity and mezzanine investment funds that invest in privately owned middle market operating companies to facilitate growth or ownership transition. PCI loans from the Colonial acquisition and related net interest income are also included in this segment. Performance results of bank acquisitions prior to system conversion are typically reported in this segment and on a post-conversion date are reported in the Community Banking segment.

Segment Asset Transfer

During January 2014, approximately $8.3 billion of home equity loansother segments as applicable.


Year Ended December 31, CB-Retail CB-Commercial FS&CF
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income (expense) $3,415
 $3,290
 $3,035
 $1,740
 $1,604
 $1,345
 $583
 $511
 $443
Net intersegment interest income (expense) 149
 115
 (119) 379
 404
 324
 127
 142
 110
Segment net interest income 3,564
 3,405
 2,916
 2,119
 2,008
 1,669
 710
 653
 553
Allocated provision for credit losses 501
 475
 365
 69
 (40) 1
 (15) 128
 67
Segment net interest income after provision 3,063
 2,930
 2,551
 2,050
 2,048
 1,668
 725
 525
 486
Noninterest income 1,404
 1,354
 1,342
 423
 392
 390
 1,181
 1,148
 1,046
Noninterest expense 2,725
 2,469
 2,357
 1,198
 1,302
 1,153
 1,190
 1,141
 1,020
Income (loss) before income taxes 1,742
 1,815
 1,536
 1,275
 1,138
 905
 716
 532
 512
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 650
 686
 588
 441
 403
 324
 225
 156
 151
Segment net income (loss) $1,092
 $1,129
 $948
 $834
 $735
 $581
 $491
 $376
 $361
                   
Identifiable assets (period end) $71,093
 $74,642
 $71,027
 $56,563
 $55,035
 $51,231
 $29,144
 $26,795
 $25,294
                   
  IH&PF OT&C (1) Total BB&T Corporation
  2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Net interest income (expense) $98
 $86
 $79
 $699
 $830
 $690
 $6,535
 $6,321
 $5,592
Net intersegment interest income (expense) (21) (19) (16) (634) (642) (299) 
 
 
Segment net interest income 77
 67
 63
 65
 188
 391
 6,535
 6,321
 5,592
Allocated provision for credit losses 4
 3
 4
 (12) 6
 (9) 547
 572
 428
Segment net interest income after provision 73
 64
 59
 77
 182
 400
 5,988
 5,749
 5,164
Noninterest income 1,777
 1,731
 1,611
 (3) (153) (370) 4,782
 4,472
 4,019
Noninterest expense 1,590
 1,525
 1,371
 741
 284
 365
 7,444
 6,721
 6,266
Income (loss) before income taxes 260
 270
 299
 (667) (255) (335) 3,326
 3,500
 2,917
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 99
 104
 105
 (504) (291) (374) 911
 1,058
 794
Segment net income (loss) $161
 $166
 $194
 $(163) $36
 $39
 $2,415
 $2,442
 $2,123
                   
Identifiable assets (period end) $6,024
 $5,943
 $4,998
 $58,818
 $56,861
 $57,397
 $221,642
 $219,276
 $209,947
(1) Includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and lines were transferred from Community Banking to Residential Mortgage Banking based on a change in how these loans are managed as a result of qualified mortgage regulations. The following tables have been retrospectively adjusted for the loan transfer.

Segment Realignment

During the first quarter of 2016, the asset-based lending group within the Specialized Lending segment was moved to Community Banking, and the supply-chain lending responsibility was moved from the Specialized Lending segment to the Financial Services segment. The following tables present segment results prior to the realignment and subsequent to the realignment.

qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
144

BB&T Corporation
Reportable Segments - Before Realignment
Year Ended December 31
                                       
    Community Banking Residential Mortgage Banking Dealer Financial Services Specialized Lending
    2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013 
                                       
     (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (expense)$ 1,801  $ 1,726  $ 1,712  $ 1,357  $ 1,482  $ 1,584  $ 881  $ 835  $ 834  $ 651  $ 578  $ 678 
Net intersegment interest income (expense)  1,272    1,188    1,336    (905)   (984)   (999)   (153)   (160)   (158)   (186)   (146)   (126)
Segment net interest income  3,073    2,914    3,048    452    498    585    728    675    676    465    432    552 
                                    
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses  67    123    279    9    (107)   12    254    237    214    48    39    85 
Noninterest income  1,166    1,184    1,180    355    310    481    7    2    5    271    232    222 
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)  135    120    178    2    2    2    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―   
Noninterest expense  1,517    1,428    1,573    314    498    357    151    114    106    256    211    245 
Amortization of intangibles  23    29    36    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      5    5    5 
Allocated corporate expenses  1,225    1,204    1,123    93    91    81    39    31    31    64    63    70 
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,542    1,434    1,395    393    328    618    291    295    330    363    346    369 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  564    524    511    149    124    235    111    112    126    95    89    96 
Segment net income (loss)$ 978  $ 910  $ 884  $ 244  $ 204  $ 383  $ 180  $ 183  $ 204  $ 268  $ 257  $ 273 
                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end)$ 68,245  $ 55,495  $ 55,667  $ 33,407  $ 34,463  $ 36,083  $ 15,130  $ 12,821  $ 11,525  $ 20,732  $ 18,218  $ 16,564 
                                       
    Insurance Services Financial Services Other, Treasury and Corporate (1) Total BB&T Corporation
    2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013 
                                       
    (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (expense)$ 2  $ 2  $ 3  $ 213  $ 183  $ 166  $ 687  $ 568  $ 639  $ 5,592  $ 5,374  $ 5,616 
Net intersegment interest income (expense)  7    6    6    313    263    282    (348)   (167)   (341)   ―      ―      ―   
Segment net interest income  9    8    9    526    446    448    339    401    298    5,592    5,374    5,616 
                                    
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses  ―      ―      ―      65    25    18    (15)   (66)   (16)   428    251    592 
Noninterest income  1,608    1,663    1,535    847    779    757    (235)   (314)   (144)   4,019    3,856    4,036 
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)  ―      ―      ―      22    15    16    (159)   (137)   (196)   ―      ―      ―   
Noninterest expense  1,191    1,189    1,135    680    634    604    2,052    1,687    1,651    6,161    5,761    5,671 
Amortization of intangibles  47    53    61    3    2    3    27    2    1    105    91    106 
Allocated corporate expenses  99    86    64    135    127    108    (1,655)   (1,602)   (1,477)   ―      ―      ―   
Income (loss) before income taxes  280    343    284    512    452    488    (464)   (71)   (201)   2,917    3,127    3,283 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  98    110    97    193    170    183    (416)   (208)   305    794    921    1,553 
Segment net income (loss)$ 182  $ 233  $ 187  $ 319  $ 282  $ 305  $ (48) $ 137  $ (506) $ 2,123  $ 2,206  $ 1,730 
                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end)$ 2,804  $ 2,965  $ 2,990  $ 16,374  $ 12,849  $ 10,001  $ 53,255  $ 50,023  $ 50,213  $ 209,947  $ 186,834  $ 183,043 
                                       
                                       
(1)Includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.

145

BB&T Corporation
Reportable Segments - After Realignment
Year Ended December 31
                                       
    Community Banking Residential Mortgage Banking Dealer Financial Services Specialized Lending
    2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013 
                                       
     (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (expense)$ 1,801  $ 1,726  $ 1,712  $ 1,357  $ 1,482  $ 1,584  $ 881  $ 835  $ 834  $ 648  $ 575  $ 676 
Net intersegment interest income (expense)  1,272    1,188    1,336    (905)   (984)   (999)   (153)   (160)   (158)   (236)   (205)   (140)
Segment net interest income  3,073    2,914    3,048    452    498    585    728    675    676    412    370    536 
                                    
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses  67    123    279    9    (107)   12    254    237    214    43    36    83 
Noninterest income  1,166    1,184    1,180    355    310    481    7    2    5    260    222    222 
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)  135    120    178    2    2    2    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―   
Noninterest expense  1,517    1,428    1,573    321    498    357    151    114    106    254    210    243 
Amortization of intangibles  23    29    36    ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      ―      4    5    5 
Allocated corporate expenses  1,225    1,204    1,123    93    91    81    39    31    31    63    62    69 
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,542    1,434    1,395    386    328    618    291    295    330    308    279    358 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  564    524    511    146    124    235    111    112    126    74    64    92 
Segment net income (loss)$ 978  $ 910  $ 884  $ 240  $ 204  $ 383  $ 180  $ 183  $ 204  $ 234  $ 215  $ 266 
                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end)$ 68,245  $ 55,495  $ 55,667  $ 33,407  $ 34,463  $ 36,083  $ 15,130  $ 12,821  $ 11,525  $ 18,222  $ 15,641  $ 15,993 
                                       
    Insurance Services Financial Services Other, Treasury and Corporate (1) Total BB&T Corporation
    2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013  2015  2014  2013 
                                       
    (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income (expense)$ 2  $ 2  $ 3  $ 217  $ 187  $ 169  $ 686  $ 567  $ 638  $ 5,592  $ 5,374  $ 5,616 
Net intersegment interest income (expense)  7    6    6    312    262    295    (297)   (107)   (340)   ―      ―      ―   
Segment net interest income  9    8    9    529    449    464    389    460    298    5,592    5,374    5,616 
                                    
Allocated provision for loan and lease losses  ―      ―      ―      65    26    20    (10)   (64)   (16)   428    251    592 
Noninterest income  1,608    1,663    1,535    847    779    757    (224)   (304)   (144)   4,019    3,856    4,036 
Intersegment net referral fees (expense)  ―      ―      ―      22    15    16    (159)   (137)   (196)   ―      ―      ―   
Noninterest expense  1,191    1,189    1,135    682    635    606    2,045    1,687    1,651    6,161    5,761    5,671 
Amortization of intangibles  47    53    61    3    2    3    28    2    1    105    91    106 
Allocated corporate expenses  99    86    64    136    127    109    (1,655)   (1,601)   (1,477)   ―      ―      ―   
Income (loss) before income taxes  280    343    284    512    453    499    (402)   (5)   (201)   2,917    3,127    3,283 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  98    110    97    193    170    187    (392)   (183)   305    794    921    1,553 
Segment net income (loss)$ 182  $ 233  $ 187  $ 319  $ 283  $ 312  $ (10) $ 178  $ (506) $ 2,123  $ 2,206  $ 1,730 
                                       
Identifiable segment assets (period end)$ 2,804  $ 2,965  $ 2,990  $ 16,429  $ 12,887  $ 10,572  $ 55,710  $ 52,562  $ 50,213  $ 209,947  $ 186,834  $ 183,043 
                                       
                                       
(1)Includes financial data from subsidiaries below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.

146

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of February 25, 2016:

BB&T Corporation
(Registrant)
Exhibit No. 
Description /s/ Kelly S. King
Kelly S. King
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 25, 2016:

/s/ Kelly S. King
Kelly S. King
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Daryl N. Bible
Daryl N. Bible
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Cynthia B. Powell
Cynthia B. Powell
Executive Vice President and
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

147

A Majority of the Directors of the Registrant are included:
/s/ Kelly S. King/s/ Christine Sears
Kelly S. KingChristine Sears
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDirector
/s/ Jennifer S. Banner/s/ Thomas E. Skains
Jennifer S. BannerThomas E. Skains
DirectorDirector
/s/ K. David Boyer, Jr./s/ Thomas N. Thompson
K. David Boyer, Jr.Thomas N. Thompson
DirectorDirector
/s/ Anna R. Cablik/s/ Edwin H. Welch, Ph.D.
Anna R. CablikEdwin H. Welch, Ph.D.
DirectorDirector
/s/ James A. Faulkner/s/ Stephen T. Williams
James A. FaulknerStephen T. Williams
DirectorDirector
/s/ I. Patricia Henry
I. Patricia Henry
Director
/s/ Eric C. Kendrick
Eric C. Kendrick
Director
/s/ Dr. Louis B. Lynn
Dr. Louis B. Lynn
Director
/s/ Edward C. Milligan
Edward C. Milligan
Director
/s/ Charles A. Patton
Charles A. Patton
Director
/s/ Nido R. Qubein
Nido R. Qubein
Director
/s/ William J. Reuter
William J. Reuter
Director
/s/ Tollie W. Rich, Jr.
Tollie W. Rich, Jr.
Director

148

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
2.1 Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank All Deposits, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of Colonial Bank, Montgomery, Alabama, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Branch Banking and Trust Company, dated as of August 14, 2009. 
2.2Termination agreement among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of Colonial Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Branch Banking & Trust Company dated as of September 14, 2016.
2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 11, 2014, by and between BB&T Corporation and Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. 
2.32.4 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between BB&T Corporation and National Penn Bancshares, Inc. 
3(i) Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended and restated April 30, 2014. 
3(ii)Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, dated as of March 4, 2016
3(iii) Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated January 27, 2015.December 19, 2017 
4.1 Indenture Regarding Senior Securities (including form of Senior Debt Security) between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor in interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company), as trustee, dated as of May 24, 1996. 
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 4, 2009, to the Indenture Regarding Senior Securities, dated as of May 24, 1996, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association. 
4.3 Indenture Regarding Subordinated Securities (including Form of Subordinated Debt Security) between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association (as successor in interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company), as trustee, dated as of May 24, 1996. 
4.4 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 23, 2003, to the Indenture Regarding Subordinated Securities, dated as of May 24, 1996, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association. 
4.5 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 24, 2004, to the Indenture Regarding Subordinated Securities, dated as of May 24, 1996, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association. 
4.6 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated May 4, 2009, to the Indenture Regarding Subordinated Securities, dated as of May 24, 1996, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association. 
10.1* BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Stock Option Plan (amended and restated January 1, 2005). 

149

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
10.2* BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (as amended through February 24, 2009). 
10.3* BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan, as amended 
10.4* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) for the BB&T 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.5*Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (4-Year Vesting).Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 7, 2010.
10.6* Form of Non-Employee Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (5-Year Vesting). 

10.7*
Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
10.6* Form of Non-Employee Director Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (4-Year Vesting). 
10.8*10.7* Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (5-Year Vesting). 
10.9*10.8* Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (4-Year Vesting). 
10.10*10.9* Southern National Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Executives including amendments. 
10.11*†10.10* BB&T Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (January 1, 2012 Restatement). Filed herewith.
10.12*†10.11* First Amendment to the BB&T Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (January 1, 2012 Restatement). Filed herewith.
10.13*†10.12* Second Amendment to the BB&T Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (January 1, 2012 Restatement). Filed herewith.
10.14*†10.13* BB&T Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan (January 1, 2012 Restatement). Filed herewith.
10.15*†10.14* BB&T Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Trust (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012). Filed herewith.

150

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation10.15 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 2016.
10.16*10.15* Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (4-Year Vesting with Clawback Provision). 
10.17*Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the BB&T Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (4-Year Vesting with Clawback Provision).Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 4, 2012.
10.18*10.16* Form of Employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.19*10.17* Form of Nonqualified Option Agreement (Senior Executive) for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.20*10.18* Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.21*10.19* Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.22*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Performance-Based Vesting Component) for Executive Officers under the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (2013 grants).Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 2, 2013.
10.23*10.20* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Performance-Based Vesting Component)(Senior Executive) for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (2014 grants).Plan. 
10.24*10.21* Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Tier 2 Employee) for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan. 
10.25*Form of LTIP Award Agreement for Executive Officers under the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (2013 – 2015 performance period).Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 2, 2013.
10.26*10.22* Form of LTIP Award Agreement for Executive Officers under the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (2014 – 2016 performance period). 
10.27*10.23*Form of LTIP Award Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan.
10.24*Modification of 2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Award - Summary.

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
10.25*Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan.
10.26* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Kelly S. King dated as of December 19, 2012. 
10.28*10.27* 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Christopher L. Henson. 

151

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
10.29*10.28* 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Daryl N. Bible. 
10.30*2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Ricky K. Brown.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2009.
10.31*10.29* 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Barbara F. Duck. 
10.32*10.30* 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Donna C. Goodrich. 
10.33*10.31* 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Clarke R. Starnes, III. 
10.34*2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Steven B. Wiggs.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2009.
10.35*2012 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and Cynthia A. Williams.Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 2, 2012.
10.36*10.32* 2012 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Co. and William R. Yates. 
10.37*10.33* 2014 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and Robert J. Johnson, Jr. 
10.38*10.34* 2016 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and W. Bennett Bradley. Filed herewith.
10.39*10.35* 2016 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and David H. Weaver. Filed herewith.
10.40*10.36* Merger Completion Incentive Program - Summary
2016 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and Jimmy D. Godwin.

 
10.37*
2016 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and Brant J. Standridge.

10.38*
2016 Employment Agreement by and among BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company and Dontá L. Wilson.

11 Statement re computation of earnings per share. 
12† Statement re computation of ratios. 
21† Subsidiaries of the Registrant. 

152

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
23† Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. 
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. Filed herewith.
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase. Filed herewith.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document. Filed herewith.
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. Filed herewith.
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. Filed herewith.
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. Filed herewith.

*Management compensatory plan or arrangement.
Exhibit filed with the SEC and available upon request.

153 



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, as of February 20, 2018:

BB&T Corporation
(Registrant)
/s/ Kelly S. King
Kelly S. King
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 20, 2018: 

/s/ Kelly S. King/s/ Charles A. Patton
Kelly S. KingCharles A. Patton
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDirector
/s/ Jennifer S. Banner/s/ Nido R. Qubein
Jennifer S. BannerNido R. Qubein
DirectorDirector
/s/ K. David Boyer, Jr./s/ William J. Reuter
K. David Boyer, Jr.William J. Reuter
DirectorDirector
/s/ Anna R. Cablik/s/ Tollie W. Rich, Jr.
Anna R. CablikTollie W. Rich, Jr.
DirectorDirector
/s/ I. Patricia Henry/s/ Christine Sears
I. Patricia HenryChristine Sears
DirectorDirector
/s/ Eric C. Kendrick/s/ Thomas E. Skains
Eric C. KendrickThomas E. Skains
DirectorDirector
/s/ Dr. Louis B. Lynn/s/ Thomas N. Thompson
Dr. Louis B. LynnThomas N. Thompson
DirectorDirector
/s/ Daryl N. Bible/s/ Cynthia B. Powell
Daryl N. BibleCynthia B. Powell
Senior Executive Vice President andExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerCorporate Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)(Principal Accounting Officer)

125