UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    . 
Commission File Number 1-5924
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANYCOMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Arizona86-0062700
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
88 East Broadway Boulevard,, Tucson,, AZ85701
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (520) (520) 571-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, No Par Value (Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated FilerSmaller Reporting CompanyEmerging Growth Company



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No x

i




State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates: None
As of February 12, 2020,10, 2022, Tucson Electric Power Company had 32,139,434 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding, all of which were held by UNS Energy Corporation, an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Fortis Inc.
Documents incorporated by reference: None
Tucson Electric Power Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is, therefore, filing portions of this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

Explanatory Note

Tucson Electric Power (TEP) filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (Original Filing) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 11, 2022. TEP is filing this Amendment No. 1 (Amendment) to the Original Filing solely for the purpose of filing revised versions of Exhibits 31(a), 31(b), and 32 submitted with the Original Filing (Exhibits). In the Original Filing, each of the Exhibits makes reference to the "quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2021" rather than the "annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021." The Exhibits have been modified in this Amendment solely to revise the references to the “annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021” in each case and to reflect the date of filing of this Amendment. TEP has included in this Amendment a complete copy of the Original Filing, as amended per the above, and as modified to update the Exhibit Index included in Item 15 to indicate that Exhibit 23 and Exhibit 24 were filed with the Original Filing and are not being refiled as part of this Amendment.
No attempt has been made in this Amendment to amend, modify, or update any financial information or other disclosure presented in the Original Filing, nor does this Amendment reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Filing or amend, modify, or update those disclosures, including the exhibits to the Original Filing and the Exhibit Index included in Item 15, except as described in the immediately preceding paragraph. Information described herein reflects the disclosures made at the time of the Original Filing on February 11, 2022. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing, including any amendments to those filings.
ii





Table of Contents
PART I
PART I
PART II

iii




iii




iv








DEFINITIONS
The abbreviations and acronyms used in the 20192021 Form 10-K are defined below:
INDUSTRY ACRONYMS AND CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
2010 Reimbursement2015 Credit AgreementReimbursement Agreement, dated December 14, 2010 between TEP, as borrower,TEP's prior credit facility entered into in October 2015, and extended through October 2022, that provided for revolving credit commitments and a financial institutionLOC facility
2015 Credit Agreement2019 FERC Rate CaseThe 2015 Credit Agreement provides for a $250 million revolving creditIn 2019, the FERC issued an order approving TEP's proposed OATT revisions effective August 1, 2019, subject to refund and letter of credit facilities with a sublimit of $50 million; the credit agreement matures in 2020further proceedings
2019 Credit Agreement2020 IRPThe 2019 Credit Agreement provides for up to $225 million in term loans; the credit agreement matures inTEP's 2020
2019 Rate CaseA pending general rate case Integrated Resource Plan filed with the ACC by TEP in April 2019 requesting new rates be implemented in MayJune 2020, which outlines TEP's energy portfolio through 2035
ABR2020 Rate OrderA rate order issued by the ACC resulting in a new rate structure for TEP, effective on January 1, 2021
2021 Credit AgreementIn October 2021, TEP entered into an unsecured credit agreement that provides for revolving credit commitments with swingline and LOC sublimits, due in October 2026, the termination date
ABRAlternate Base Rate
ACCArizona Corporation Commission
ACC Refund OrderAn order issued by the ACC approving TEP’s proposal to return savings from the Company’s federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA to its customers through a combination of a customer bill credit and a regulatory liability that reflects the deferral of the return of a portion of the savings, effective May 1, 2018
ACEAffordable Clean Energy
ADEQArizona Department of Environmental Quality
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction
ALJAdministrative Law Judge
AMTAlternative Minimum Tax
AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income
AROAsset Retirement Obligation
CCRBTABuild-Transfer Agreement
CARES ActCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
COVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019
CCRCoal Combustion Residuals
DGDistributed Generation
DSMDGDistributed Generation
DSMDemand Side Management
ECAEnvironmental Compliance Adjustor
EDITExcess Deferred Income Taxes
EE StandardsEnergy Efficiency Standards
EIMEnergy Imbalance Market
EPA
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FERC Refund OrderGAAPAn order issued by the FERC approving TEP's proposal of an overall transmission rate reduction reflecting the lower federal tax rate, effective March 21, 2018
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
GHGGreenhouse Gas
LFCRIRSInternal Revenue Service
LFCRLost Fixed Cost Recovery
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
LOCLetter(s) of Credit
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NOPRNotice of Proposed Rulemaking
OATTOpen Access Transmission Tariff
PBIPerformance Based Incentives
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PPFACPurchased Power and Fuel Adjustment Clause
PSUPerformance-Based Share Units

v








PURPANERCPublic Utility Regulatory Policies ActNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
PVNOPRPhotovoltaicNotice of Proposed Rulemaking
RCRAOATTOpen Access Transmission Tariff
PBIPerformance Based Incentives
PPAPower Purchase Agreement
PPFACPurchased Power and Fuel Adjustment Clause
v


PSUPerformance-Based Share Units
PTCProduction Tax Credit
PVPhotovoltaic
RCRAResource Conservation and Recovery Act
RECRenewable Energy Credit
Regional HazeRegional Haze Regulation promulgated by the EPA to improve visibility at national parks and wilderness areas
RESRenewable Energy Standard
RESTRenewable Energy Standard and Tariff
Retail RatesRates designed to allow a regulated utility recovery of its costs of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investment
RICEReciprocating Internal Combustion Engine
RMCRisk Management Committee
RSU
RSURestricted Share Units
SERPSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan
TCASummer MoratoriumEmergency rules first enacted by the ACC in 2019 that suspend service disconnections and late fees for electric residential customers who otherwise would be eligible for service disconnection during the period from June 1 through October 15
TCATransmission Cost Adjustor
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TEAMTax Expense Adjustor Mechanism
Tolling PPAA 20-year tolling PPA that TEP entered into in 2017 with SRP to purchase and receive all 550 MW of capacity, power, and ancillary services from Gila River Unit 2, which included a three-year option to purchase the unit
VEBAVoluntary Employee Beneficiary Association
VIEVariable Interest Entity
ENTITIES AND GENERATING STATIONS
Fortis
ENTITIES AND GENERATING STATIONS
APSArizona Public Service Company
FortisFortis Inc., a corporation incorporated under the Corporations Act of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, whose principal executive offices are located at Fortis Place, Suite 1100, 5 Springdale Street, St. John's, NL A1E 0E4
FortisUSFortis intermediate holding company
Four CornersFour Corners Generating Station
Gila RiverGila River Generating Station
LunaLuna Generating Station
NavajoNavajo Generating Station
Oso GrandeA 250 MW nominal capacity wind-powered electric generation facility, which is under constructionlocated in southeastern New Mexico
PNMPublic Service Company of New Mexico
San JuanSan Juan Generating Station
SESSouthwest Energy Solutions, Inc.
SJCCSan Juan Coal Company
SpringervilleSpringerville Generating Station
Springerville Common FacilitiesPortion of the facilities at Springerville used in common with Springerville Unit 1 and Unit 2
SRPSalt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
SundtH. Wilson Sundt Generating Station
TEPTucson Electric Power Company, the principal subsidiary of UNS Energy Corporation
Tri-StateTri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
UASTPUniversity of Arizona Science and Technology Park
UNS ElectricUNS Electric, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of UNS Energy Corporation
UNS EnergyUNS Energy Corporation, the parent company of TEP, whose principal executive offices are located at 88 East Broadway Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85701

vi


Table of Contents






UNS Energy AffiliatesAffiliated subsidiaries of UNS Energy Corporation including UniSource Energy Services, Inc., UNS Electric, Inc., UNS Gas, Inc., and Southwest Energy Solutions, Inc.
UNS GasUNS Gas, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of UNS Energy Corporation
UNITS OF MEASURE
ACAlternating Current
BBtuBillion British thermal unit(s)
GWhGigawatt-hour(s)
kWhKilowatt-hour(s)
MMBtuMillion Metric British thermal units
MWMegawatt(s)
MWhMegawatt-hour(s)

vii








FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. TEP, or the Company, is including the following cautionary statements to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by TEP in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future economic conditions, future operational or financial performance and underlying assumptions, and other statements that are not statements of historical facts. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, predicts, potential, projects, would, and similar expressions. From time to time, we may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, and whether made by or on behalf of TEP, are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements which may accompany thesuch forward-looking statements. In addition, TEP disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report, except as may otherwise be required by the federal securities laws.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed therein. We express our estimates, expectations, beliefs, and projections in good faith and believe them to have a reasonable basis. However, we make no assurances that management’s estimates, expectations, beliefs, or projections will be achieved or accomplished. We have identified the following important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements. These may be in addition to other factors and matters discussed in: Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors; Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; and other parts of this report. These factors include: voter initiatives and state and federal regulatory and legislative decisions and actions, including changes in tax and energy policies and the adoption of new regulations regarding electric service disconnections; any change in the structure of utility service in Arizona resulting from the ACC'sACC or state legislature's examination of the state's energy policies;policies and applications by other companies to the ACC requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide competitive electric generation service to customers in our service territory; changes in, and compliance with, environmental laws and regulatory decisions and policies that could increase operating and capital costs, reduce generation facility output, or accelerate generation facility retirements; the final outcome of the general rate case filed with the ACC in April 2019;2019 FERC Rate Case; the outcome of Phase 2 of the proposal filed with2020 Rate Order; unfavorable rulings, penalties, or findings by the FERC in May 2019 requesting revisions to TEP's OATT;FERC; regional economic and market conditions that could affect customer growth and energy usage;electricity usage of customers; changes in energy consumption by retail customers; risks related to climate change, including shifts in weather variationsseasonality and/or extreme weather events affecting energy usage;electricity usage of our customers and/or the performance of our operations; our forecasts of peak demand and whether existing generation capacity and PPAs are sufficient to meet the expected demand plus reserve margin requirements; the cost of debt and equity capital and access to capital markets and bank markets, which may affect our ability to raise additional capital and use the proceeds from any capital that we do raise as originally intended; the performance of the stock market and a changing interest rate environment, which affect the value of our pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the related contribution requirements and expenses; the potential inability to make additions to our existing high voltage transmission system; unexpected increases in operations and maintenance expense; resolution of pending litigation matters; changes in accounting standards; changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates; the ongoing impact of mandated energy efficiency and DG initiatives; changes to long-term contracts; the cost of fuel and power supplies; the ability to obtain coal from our suppliers; cyber-attacks, data breaches, or other challenges to our information security, including our operations and technology systems; the performance of TEP's generation facilities; the development of our wind powered electricfacilities, including renewable generation facility in southeastern New Mexico;resources; participation in the EIM; andthe extent of the impact of the TCJACOVID-19 pandemic on our financial conditionbusiness and resultsoperations, and the economic and societal disruptions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and government actions taken in response thereto; and the implementation of operations, including the assumptions we make relating thereto.our 2020 IRP.


viii








PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS
General
TEP and its predecessor companies have served the greater Tucson metropolitan area for 127129 years. TEP was incorporated in the State of Arizona in 1963. TEP is a regulated electric utility company serving approximately 429,000438,000 retail customers. TEP’s service territory covers 1,155 square miles and includes a population of over one million people in Pima County, as well as parts of Cochise County. TEP's principal business operations include generating, transmitting, and distributing electricity to its retail customers. In addition to retail sales, TEP sells electricity, transmission, and ancillary services to other utilities, municipalities, and energy marketing companies on a wholesale basis. TEP is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation. The regulated electric utility operation is TEP's only segment.
TEP is a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of UNS Energy, a utility services holding company. UNS Energy is an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Fortis, which is a leaderwhose principal executive offices are located in the North American electricSt. John's, Newfoundland and gas utility business.Labrador, Canada.
Regulated Utility Operations
TEP delivers electricity to retail customers in southern Arizona. TEP owns or has contracts for coal, natural gas, wind,coal-fired, and solarrenewable generation resources to provide electricity. This electricity, together with electricity purchased in the wholesale market, is delivered over transmission lines which are part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the United States. The electricity is then transformed to lower voltages and delivered to customers through TEP's distribution system.
FERC Regulation and Rates
The FERC regulates portions of utility accounting practices and rates of TEP, including rates and services for electric transmission and wholesale power sales in interstate commerce. The FERC establishes rates that allow a utility to recover transmission related costs.
FERC Rates
TEP has a forward-looking OATT formula rate, which updates annually and allows for timely recovery of transmission related costs. TEP's OATT formula rate is currently subject to refund following hearing and settlement procedures. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
ACC Regulation and Rates
TEP operates under a certificate of public convenience and necessity as regulated by the ACC, under which TEP is obligated to provide electricity service to customers within its service territory. The ACC establishes rates that are designed to allow a regulated utility recovery of its cost of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investment (Retail Rates).
The ACC regulates rates charged to retail customers, the siting of generation and transmission facilities, the issuance of securities, transactions with affiliated parties, and other utility matters. The ACC also enacts other regulations and policies that can affect TEP's business decisions and accounting practices.
Renewable Energy Standard
The ACC’s RES requires Arizona regulated utilities to supply an increasing percentage of their retail sales from renewable generation sources each year until renewable retail sales represent at least 15% by 2025. The RES also requires that DG account for 30% of the renewable energy requirement. Arizona utilities are required to file an annual RES implementation plan for review and approval by the ACC. TEP currently plans to meet these requirements through a combination of utility-owned resources, PPAs, and customer-sited DG.
In 2021, the percentage of retail kWh sales attributable to the RES was approximately 26%, exceeding the 2021 requirement of 11%.
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding RES.
1


Table of Contents
Energy Efficiency Standard
Under the EE Standards, the ACC requires electric utilities to implement cost-effective programs to reduce customers' energy consumption. As of December 31, 2021, TEP’s cumulative annual energy savings was approximately 23%.
RES requirements and EE Standards may be impacted by changes to Arizona's energy policy. See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Factors Affecting Results of Operations and Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
ACC Rates
Retail Rates are generally established in rate case proceedings. TEP's last rate case proceeding was finalized in 2020. As a result of past regulatory decisions, TEP has cost recovery mechanisms that allow for more timely recovery of certain costs between rate case proceedings. These mechanisms are generally reset annually through separate filings with the ACC. TEP's cost recovery mechanisms include:
PPFAC — a usage-based charge or credit that reflects changes in energy costs that are not recovered through base rates established in a rate case.
REST — a usage-based charge that recovers the cost of complying with the RES.
DSM — a usage-based charge that recovers the cost of energy efficiency programs that are designed to help TEP comply with the EE Standards.
LFCR — a usage-based charge that partially offsets the revenue TEP loses when customers reduce their bills as a result of energy efficiency programs and DG system installations.
ECA — a usage-based charge that recovers certain costs incurred at TEP's generation stations to comply with environmental regulations.
TEAM — a usage-based charge or credit that allows TEP to pass-through the regulatory deferral balance related to the TCJA in 2021, the change in EDIT, and any material income tax effects of post-test year tax legislation.
TCA — a usage-based charge or credit that allows TEP to reflect changes in costs related to investments and expenses included in TEP's FERC OATT formula rate.
See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Factors Affecting Results of Operations and Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on TEP's 2020 Rate Order and cost recovery mechanisms.
2


Table of Contents
Customers
Electricity sold to retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers over the last threefive years were as follows:
(sales in GWh)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Electric Sales                   
Residential3,698 22% 3,766
 24% 3,786
 29% 3,724
 29% 3,724
 28%
Commercial2,077 13% 2,136
 14% 2,192
 17% 2,139
 17% 2,124
 15%
Industrial, non-Mining1,896 11% 1,949
 12% 1,939
 15% 2,006
 16% 2,063
 15%
Industrial, Mining1,057 6% 1,033
 7% 991
 8% 997
 8% 1,109
 8%
Other16 % 16
 % 18
 % 30
 % 33
 %
Total Retail Sales by Customer Class8,744 53% 8,900
 57% 8,926
 68% 8,896
 70% 9,053
 66%
Wholesale Sales, Long-Term490 3% 424
 3% 587
 4% 463
 4% 750
 5%
Wholesale Sales, Short-Term(1)
7,257 44% 6,279
 40% 3,630
 28% 3,308
 26% 3,928
 29%
Total Electric Sales16,491 100% 15,603
 100% 13,143
 100% 12,667
 100% 13,731
 100%
                    
Average Number of Retail Customers                   
Residential387,409 90% 384,021
 90% 381,399
 90% 378,991
 90% 376,439
 90%
Commercial38,838 9% 38,642
 9% 38,564
 9% 38,403
 9% 38,253
 9%
Industrial, non-Mining503 % 504
 % 520
 % 580
 % 588
 %
Industrial, Mining4 % 4
 % 4
 % 4
 % 4
 %
Other1,872 1% 1,873
 1% 1,879
 1% 1,866
 1% 1,857
 1%
Total Retail Customers428,626 100% 425,044
 100% 422,366
 100% 419,844
 100% 417,141
 100%
(1)
Short-term wholesale sales increased due to the increase in generation capacity related to Gila River Unit 2.

1







(sales in GWh)20212020201920182017
Electric Sales
Residential3,82025 %4,170 28 %3,698 22 %3,766 24 %3,786 29 %
Commercial1,93913 %2,005 13 %2,077 13 %2,136 14 %2,192 17 %
Industrial, non-Mining1,89312 %1,834 12 %1,896 11 %1,949 12 %1,939 15 %
Industrial, Mining1,050%1,086 %1,057 %1,033 %991 %
Other16— %16 — %16 — %16 — %18 — %
Total Retail Sales by Customer Class8,71857 %9,11161 %8,74453 %8,90057 %8,92668 %
Wholesale Sales, Long-Term837%508 %490 %424 %587 %
Wholesale Sales, Short-Term(1)
5,64337 %5,279 35 %7,257 44 %6,279 40 %3,630 28 %
Total Electric Sales15,198100 %14,898 100 %16,491 100 %15,603 100 %13,143 100 %
Average Number of Retail Customers
Residential396,56290 %391,95390 %387,40990 %384,02190 %381,39990 %
Commercial39,395%39,096%38,838%38,642%38,564%
Industrial, non-Mining523— %491— %503— %504— %520— %
Industrial, Mining4— %4— %4— %4— %4— %
Other1,873%1,877%1,872%1,873%1,879%
Total Retail Customers438,357100 %433,421100 %428,626100 %425,044100 %422,366100 %
(1)In 2020, short-term sales decreased due to: (i) the retirement of Navajo in 2019; and (ii) Gila River Unit 2 replacing the generation to serve retail load. Short-term sales increased in 2019 and 2018 due to an increase in generation capacity related to Gila River Unit 2.
Retail Customers
TEP provides electric utility service to a diverse group of residential, commercial, industrial, and public sector customers. Major industries served include copper mining, cement manufacturing, defense, healthcare, education, military bases, and governmental entities. TEP’s retail sales are influenced by several factors including economic conditions, seasonal weather patterns, DSM initiatives and the increasing use of energy-efficient products, and customer-sited DG.
Local, regional, and national economic factors impact the growth in the number of customers in TEP’s service territory. In each of the past five years, TEP’s average number of retail customers increased by less thanapproximately 1%. TEP expects the number of retail customers to increase at a rate of approximately 1% in 20202022 based on the estimated population growth in its service territory.
TEP’s retail sales volume in 20192021 was 8,7448,718 GWh, which is a decrease of 3%2% from 20152017 levels. During the past five years, mining load reductionsdecreased sales volumes due to variation in weather and state requirements to promote energy efficiency and DG have resultedbeen tempered by customer growth.
In 2020, due to changes in lower sales volumes.consumer and business behavior in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in energy usage by commercial and industrial customers. Due to stay at home orders and the adoption of work from home practices, along with record heat in 2020, there was an offsetting increase in energy usage by residential customers starting in the second quarter of 2020. In 2021, usage began to return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic patterns.
See Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Factors Affecting Results of Operations of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding COVID-19 pandemic impacts.
Wholesale Customers
TEP’s utility operations include the wholesale marketing of electricity to other utilities and power marketers. Wholesale sales transactions are made on both a firm and interruptible basis. A firm contract requires TEP to supply power on demand (except
3


Table of Contents
under limited emergency circumstances), while an interruptible contract allows TEP to stop supplying power under defined conditions.
Generally, TEP commits to future sales based on expected generation capability, forward prices, and generation costs using a diversified portfolio approach to provide a balance between long-term, mid-term, and spot power sales.
Long-Term Wholesale Sales
Contracts for long-term wholesale sales cover periods of one year or greater. TEP typically uses its own generation to serve the requirements of its long-term wholesale customers.
TEP's primary long-term wholesale sale contracts are presented in the table below:
CounterpartyContracts Expire December 31,
Navajo Tribal Utility Authority2022
TRICO Electric Cooperative2024
Navopache Electric Cooperative2041
Short-Term Wholesale Sales
Certain contracts for short-term wholesale sales cover periods of less than one year and obligate TEP to sell capacity or power at a fixed price. TEP also engages in short-term wholesale sales by selling power in the daily or hourly markets at fluctuating spot market prices and making other non-firm power sales. The majority of ourTEP's revenues from short-term wholesale sales are passed through to TEP’s retail customers offsetting fuel and purchased power costs. TEP uses short-term wholesale sales as part of its hedging strategy to reduce customer exposure to fluctuating power prices.
Energy Imbalance Market
In May 2019, TEP signed an agreement with the California Independent System Operator indicating its intent to begin participating in the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) by springEIM. TEP is preparing to enter the EIM in the second quarter of 2022. Participation in the EIM is voluntary and available to all balancing authorities in the western United States. In order to participate in the EIM, TEP must demonstrate resource adequacy through a combination of owned or contracted resources. TEP's participation in the EIM is expected to: (i) reduce the costs to serve customers through more efficient dispatch of a larger and more diverse pool of resources; (ii) allow for more effective integration of renewables; and (iii) enhance reliability through improved system utilization and responsiveness.
Competition
Retail Customers
TEP is the primary electric service provider to retail customers within its service territory and operates under a certificate of public convenience and necessity as regulated by the ACC.
In 2018, the ACC opened a docketrulemaking dockets to evaluate severalpossible modifications to various energy policies including existing renewable energy and energy efficiency goals, integrated resource planning, and retail competition for generation services. In 2019 and 2020, the ACC staff prepared adiscussed draft ofrules related to retail electric competitioncompetition. The ACC discussed those draft rules and workshops have been held on the subject. Such

2







during workshops; however, draft rules have not been officially proposedproposed. In August 2021, a company filed an application with the ACC requesting a certificate of public convenience and no changes have been made. The adoption of new policies or rulesnecessity that would be subjectgrant them the authority to rulemaking proceedings atprovide competitive electric generation service to customers in TEP's service territory. If the ACC.ACC chooses to consider this application, TEP would intervene in the matter and oppose the request. TEP cannot predict what additional steps, if any, the ACC may take to further evaluate retail competition inoutcome of this docket.matter or its impact on TEP's financial position or results of operations.
Wholesale Customers
TEP engages in long-term wholesale sales to optimize its generation resources. As a result of its wholesale power activity, TEP competes with other utilities, power marketers, and independent power producers in the wholesale markets.
4


Table of Contents
Generation Facilities
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had 2,8413,184 MW of nominal generation capacity, as set forth in the following table. Nominal rating is based on current unit design basis net output, measured in AC.AC:
UnitDateCapacityOperatingTEP’s Share
Generation SourceNo.LocationIn Service(MW)Agent%(MW)
Natural Gas
Gila River2Gila Bend, AZ2003550SRP100550 
Gila River3Gila Bend, AZ2003550SRP75.0413 
Luna1Deming, NM2006555PNM33.3185 
Sundt3Tucson, AZ1962104TEP100104 
Sundt4Tucson, AZ1967156TEP100156 
Sundt Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine1-10Tucson, AZ2019-2020188TEP100188 
Sundt Internal Combustion TurbinesTucson, AZ1972-197350TEP10050 
DeMoss Petrie (1)
Tucson, AZ200175TEP10075 
North LoopTucson, AZ200196TEP10096 
Coal
Springerville1Springerville, AZ1985387TEP100387 
Springerville (2)
2Springerville, AZ1990406TEP100406 
San Juan1Farmington, NM1976340PNM50.0170 
Four Corners4Farmington, NM1969785APS7.055 
Four Corners5Farmington, NM1970785APS7.055 
Renewables
Utility-Owned Renewables (3)
Various2002-2021294TEP100294 
Total Capacity3,184 
  Unit   Date Capacity Operating TEP’s Share
Generation Source No. Location In Service (MW) Agent % (MW)
Coal              
Springerville 1 Springerville, AZ 1985 387 TEP 100 387
Springerville (1)
 2 Springerville, AZ 1990 406 TEP 100 406
San Juan 1 Farmington, NM 1976 340 PNM 50.0 170
Four Corners 4 Farmington, NM 1969 785 APS 7.0 55
Four Corners 5 Farmington, NM 1970 785 APS 7.0 55
Natural Gas              
Gila River (2)
 2 Gila Bend, AZ 2003 550 SRP 100 550
Gila River 3 Gila Bend, AZ 2003 550 SRP 75.0 413
Luna 1 Deming, NM 2006 555 PNM 33.3 185
Sundt 3 Tucson, AZ 1962 104 TEP 100 104
Sundt 4 Tucson, AZ 1967 156 TEP 100 156
Sundt Internal Combustion Turbines   Tucson, AZ 1972-1973 50 TEP 100 50
Sundt Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine 6-10 Tucson, AZ 2019 94 TEP 100 94
DeMoss Petrie   Tucson, AZ 2001 75 TEP 100 75
North Loop   Tucson, AZ 2001 94 TEP 100 94
Solar              
Utility-Scale Renewables   Various 2002-2017 47 TEP 100 47
Total Capacity (3)
             2,841
(1)DeMoss Petrie is accompanied by 10 MW of battery storage. Payments for battery storage are accounted for as variable lease costs.
(1)
(2)Springerville Unit 2 is owned by San Carlos Resources, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TEP.
(3)In May 2021, Oso Grande was placed in service, adding 250 MW of wind-powered electric generation.
Springerville Unit 2 is owned by San Carlos Resources, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TEP.
(2)
TEP purchased Gila River Unit 2 in December 2019.
(3)
In November 2019, Navajo was removed from service. TEP held a 7.5% share in Navajo Units 1, 2, and 3 with a total nominal capacity of 168 MW. In December 2019, Sundt Units 1 and 2 were removed from service. Sundt Units 1 and 2 had a total nominal capacity of 162 MW.
Springerville Units 3 and 4
Springerville Units 3 and 4 are each approximately 400 MW coal-fired generation facilities that are operated, but not owned, by TEP. These facilities are located at the same site as Springerville Units 1 and 2. Tri-State, the lessee of Springerville Unit 3, compensates TEP for operating the facilities and pays an allocated portion of the fixed costs related to the Springerville Common Facilities and Springerville Coal Handling Facilities. SRP, the owner of Springerville Unit 4, owns 17.05% of the Springerville Coal Handling Facilities and pays TEP for a portion14% of the fixed costs allocated for the common facilities.
Renewable Energy Resources
The ACC’s RES requires Arizona regulated utilities to increase their use of renewable energy each year until it represents at least 15% of their total annual retail energy requirements by 2025, with DG accounting for 30% of the annual renewable energy

Springerville Common Facilities.
3
5


Table of Contents






requirement. Arizona utilities must file an annual RES implementation plan for review and approval by the ACC. TEP plans to meet these requirements through a combination of utility-owned resources, PPAs, and customer-sited DG.
In 2019, the percentage of retail kWh sales attributable to the RES was approximately 16%, exceeding the 2019 requirement of 9%. The ACC approved a waiver of the 2019 DG requirement.
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Rates and Regulations below for additional information regarding RES.
Owned Utility-Scale Renewable ResourcesUtility-Owned Renewables
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP owned 4744 MW of PV solar generation capacity and 250 MW of wind generation capacity, measured in AC. The following table presents TEP's owned utility-scale renewable generation resources:
Generation SourceLocationDate/Projected Date
in Service
In Service
Capacity (MW)
Under Development
Capacity (MW)
Solar
Fort Huachuca Phase I & II (1)
Sierra Vista, AZ2014-201718 
Springerville SolarSpringerville, AZ2004-201413 
UASTP Phase I & II (2)
Tucson, AZ2010-2011
Solon Prairie Fire (2)
Tucson, AZ2012
Residential SolarTucson, AZVarious
Raptor RidgeTucson, AZ202213 
Wind
Oso Grande (3)
Chaves County, NM2021250 
Total Capacity294 13 
Generation Source Location 
Date/Projected Date
in Service
 
In Service
Capacity (MW)
 
Under Development
Capacity (MW)
Solar        
Fort Huachuca Phase I & II (1)
 Sierra Vista, AZ 2014-2017 18
  
Springerville Springerville, AZ 2004-2014 14
  
UASTP Phase I & II (2)
 Tucson, AZ 2010-2011 6
  
Sundt Areva Solar Thermal Tucson, AZ 2014 5
  
Solon Prairie Fire (2)
 Tucson, AZ 2012 4
  
Raptor Ridge Tucson, AZ 2021   10
Wind        
Oso Grande Wind Project Chaves County, NM 2020   250
Total Capacity     47
 260
(1)TEP has a 30-year easement agreement to facilitate operations on behalf of the Department of the Army.
(1)
(2)The UASTP I & II and Solon Prairie Fire are located on properties held under land easements and leases.
(3)Oso Grande was placed in service in May 2021.
TEP has a 30-year easement agreement to facilitate operations on behalf of the Department of the Army.
(2)
The UASTP I & II and Solon Prairie Fire are located on properties held under land easements and leases.
Renewable Power Purchase Agreements
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had renewable PPAs for 156256 MW from solar resources and 80179 MW from wind resources as presented in the table below. The solar PPAs contain options that allow TEP to purchase all or part of the related project at a future date. The following table's capacity is measured in AC.AC:
Generation SourceLocationDate/Projected Date
in Service
In Service
Capacity (MW)
Under Development
Capacity (MW)
Solar
Wilmot Solar (1)
Sahuarita, AZ2021100 
Red HorseWillcox, AZ201541 
Avalon ISahuarita, AZ201429 
Avra ValleyMarana, AZ201225 
Picture RocksMarana, AZ201220 
Avalon IISahuarita, AZ201616 
ValenciaTucson, AZ201310 
E.On Tech ParkTucson, AZ2012
Gato MontesTucson, AZ2012
Small PPAs (<5MW) (2)
VariousVarious
Babacomari NorthCochise County, AZ202280 
Babacomari SouthCochise County, AZ202380 
Wind
Borderlands Wind (3)
Catron County, NM202199 
Macho SpringsDeming, NM201150 
Red Horse WindWillcox, AZ201530 
Total Capacity435 160 
Generation Source Location 
Date/Projected Date
in Service
 
In Service
Capacity (MW)
 
Under Development
Capacity (MW)
Solar        
Red Horse Willcox, AZ 2015 41
  
Avalon I Sahuarita, AZ��2014 29
  
Avra Valley Marana, AZ 2012 25
  
Picture Rocks Marana, AZ 2012 20
  
Avalon II Sahuarita, AZ 2016 16
  
Valencia Tucson, AZ 2013 10
  
E.On Tech Park Tucson, AZ 2012 5
  
Gato Montes Tucson, AZ 2012 5
  
Small PPAs (<5MW) Various Various 5
  
Wilmot Solar (1)
 Sahuarita, AZ 2020   100
Wind        
Macho Springs Deming, NM 2011 50
  
Red Horse Wind Willcox, AZ 2015 30
  
Borderlands Wind Catron County, NM 2021   99
Total Capacity     236
 199
(1)In April 2021, Wilmot Solar was placed in service accompanied by 30 MW of battery storage. Payments for battery storage are accounted for as variable lease costs.

(2)Iron Horse has 2 MW of capacity accompanied by 10 MW of battery storage. Payments for battery storage are accounted for as variable lease costs.
4
6


Table of Contents






(1)
Wilmot Solar will be accompanied by 30 MW of energy storage.
ACC PURPA Ruling
On(3)Borderlands Wind was placed in service in December 17, 2019, the ACC issued a decision related to contract terms for qualifying facilities under PURPA. Congress enacted PURPA in 1978 in response to a national energy crisis. The FERC prescribes rules for the implementation of PURPA and state regulatory agencies implement PURPA. PURPA requires, among other things, that electric utilities enter into contracts to purchase power from facilities that qualify under PURPA at a price equivalent to the utility's avoided cost. The ACC's 2019 decision requires, among other things, that TEP's contracts to purchase power from qualifying facilities with renewable nameplate capacity over 100 kW include certain terms and conditions, including a minimum 18-year contract length and pricing based on TEP's long-term avoided cost. The Company cannot predict the impact of the ACC's ruling at this time.2021.
Purchased Power
TEP purchases power from other utilities and power marketers. TEP may enter into contracts to purchase: (i) power under long-term contracts to serve retail load and long-term wholesale contracts; (ii) capacity or power during periods of planned outages or for peak summer load conditions; and (iii) power for resale to certain wholesale customers under load and resource management agreements. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K related to purchased power commitments.
TEP typically uses its generation, supplemented by purchased power, to meet the summer peak demands of its retail customers. TEP hedges a portion of its total energy price exposure with forward priced contracts. Certain of these contracts are at a fixed price per MWh and others are indexed to natural gas prices. TEP also purchases power in the daily and hourly markets: (i) to meet higher than anticipated demands; (ii) during periods of generation outages; or (iii) when doing so is more economical than generating its own power.
TEP is a member of a regional reserve-sharing organization and has reliability and power-sharing relationships with other utilities. These relationships allow TEP to call upon other utilities during emergencies, such as generation facility outages and system disturbances, which reduces the amount of reserves TEP is required to carry.
Peak Demand and Future Resources
Peak Demand
(in MW)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015(in MW)20212020201920182017
Retail Customers2,367
 2,413
 2,415
 2,278
 2,222
Retail Customers2,427 2,467 2,367 2,413 2,415 
In 2019,2021, TEP's generation and purchased resources were sufficient to meet total retail and long-term wholesale peak demand, while maintaining a reserve margin in compliance with reliability criteria set forth by the Western Electricity Coordinating Council, a regional entity with delegated authority from NERC.
Peak demand occurs during the summer months due to the cooling requirements of retail customers in TEP’s service territory. Retail peak demand varies from year-to-year due to weather, energy conservation, DG, economic conditions, and other factors. Retail peak demand in 2019, 2018, and 2017 was higher than in 2016 and 2015 primarily due to warmer than normal summer temperatures.
Forecasted retail peak demand for 20202022 is 2,3252,269 MW compared with actual peak demand of 2,3672,427 MW in 2019.2021. TEP’s 20202022 estimated retail peak demand is based on weather patterns observed over a 10-year period and other factors, including estimates of customer usage. TEP believes that existing generation capacity and PPAs are sufficient to meet the expected demand and reserve margin requirements in 2020.2022.
Future Resources
As of December 31, 2019, approximately 38% of TEP's generation capacity wasstrategy on future resources is to continue its transition from coal-fired generation.carbon-intensive sources to a more sustainable energy portfolio, while maintaining reliability and ensuring rate affordability for its customers.
In June 2020, TEP is executing strategies and evaluating additional stepsfiled its 2020 IRP, which outlines its plan through 2035 to meet its electric demand while transitioning to a more sustainable energy portfolio. The plan includes a goal to reduce itscarbon emissions by 80% compared to 2005 by 2035. The IRP proposes to achieve this goal by reducing the Company's dependency on coal-fired generation over the next decade while still meeting its peak load requirementsdeveloping new renewable energy projects like Oso Grande, Raptor Ridge, and maintaining affordable Retail Rates.energy storage projects to meet electric demand. On February 9, 2022, the ACC acknowledged TEP’s IRP and found it to be reasonable and in the public interest.
In 2020, ACC staff issued a NOPR based on clean energy rules approved by the ACC. In June 2021, these rules were modified by amendments and sent back through the formal rulemaking process, resulting in ACC staff issuing a new NOPR in December 2021. The rules would have required affected utilities to, among other provisions, reduce carbon emissions below certain baseline levels, and would have also repealed the existing RES and EE Standards. In January 2022, the ACC rejected the new rules, effectively ending the rule-making process. Also in January 2022, the ACC voted to open a new rule-making docket on integrated resource planning. TEP cannot predict the timing or outcome of this proceeding.
See Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Factors Affecting Results of Operations of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding TEP's generation resources planned retirements2020 IRP and additionsthe NOPR.

7
5

Table of Contents






Fuel, SupplyPurchased Power, and Other Resources
A summary of Fuelfuel, purchased power, and Purchased Powerother resource information is provided below:
Average Cost (cents per kWh) Percentage of Total kWh ResourcesAverage Cost (cents per kWh)Percentage of Total kWh Resources
2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017202120202019202120202019
Coal2.46
 2.44
 2.41
 41% 44% 54%Coal2.60 2.51 2.46 34 %37 %41 %
Natural Gas2.33
 2.54
 3.06
 45% 42% 23%Natural Gas3.36 2.03 2.33 46 %49 %45 %
Purchased Power, Non-Renewable4.09
 4.32
 3.78
 10% 10% 18%Purchased Power, Non-Renewable8.88 6.26 4.09 10 %%10 %
Total Non-RenewableTotal Non-Renewable90 %95 %96 %
Purchased Power, Renewable9.43
 9.41
 9.49
 4% 4% 5%Purchased Power, Renewable7.63 9.42 9.43 %%%
Utility-Owned, RenewableUtility-Owned, RenewableN/AN/AN/A%%— %
Total RenewableTotal Renewable10 %%%
      100% 100% 100%
Total Fuel, Purchased Power and Other ResourcesTotal Fuel, Purchased Power and Other Resources100 %100 %100 %
Coal Supply
The coal used for generation is low-sulfur, bituminous or sub-bituminous coal sourced from mines in Arizona and New Mexico. The table below provides information on the existing coal contracts that supply ourTEP's generation stations.facilities. The average cost of coal per MMBtu, including transportation, was $2.48 in 2021 and $2.37 in 2019, $2.33 in 2018,2020 and $2.29 in 2017.2019.
StationCoal Supplier2021 Coal Consumption (tons in 000s)Contract Expiration DateAverage Sulfur ContentCoal Obtained From
SpringervillePeabody CoalSales2,14520221.0%Lee Ranch Mine/El Segundo Mine
Four CornersNTEC30620310.7%Navajo Mine
San JuanSan Juan Coal Co.57820220.8%San Juan Mine
Station Coal Supplier 2019 Coal Consumption (tons in 000s) Contract Expiration Date Average Sulfur Content Coal Obtained From
Springerville (1)
 Peabody CoalSales 2,693 2020 1.0% Lee Ranch Mine/El Segundo Mine
Four Corners NTEC 315 2031 0.7% Navajo Mine
San Juan San Juan Coal Co. 588 2022 0.8% San Juan Mine
(1)
An extension to the coal supply agreement is currently under negotiation.
Coal-Fired Generation Facilities Operated by TEP
The coal supplies for Springerville Units 1 and 2 are transported approximately 200 miles by railroad from northwestern New Mexico. TEP expects to have access to coal reserves from the supplying mines to be sufficientsupplies to fulfill the estimated requirements for each of the Springerville units' estimated remaining life.
Coal-Fired Generation Facilities Operated by Others
TEP also participates in jointly-owned coal-fired generation facilities at Four Corners and San Juan. Four Corners, which is operated by APS, and San Juan, which is operated by PNM, are mine-mouth generation facilities located adjacent to the coal reserves. TEP expects coal reserves available to these two jointly-owned generation facilities to be sufficient for the remaining lives of the stations.
8


Table of Contents
Natural Gas Supply
The table below provides information on the natural gas transportation agreements that deliver our natural gas to theTEP's generation stations.facilities. The average cost of natural gas per MMBtu, including transportation, was $5.38 in 2021, $2.19 in 2020, and $2.20 in 2019. The increase in cost in 2021 compared to 2020 and 2019 $2.92was primarily due to an increase in 2018, and $3.58natural gas prices as a result of a severe winter storm in 2017.the southwestern United States in February 2021.
StationNatural Gas Transportation CounterpartyContract Expiration Date(s)
GilaTranswestern Pipeline Co./El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC2022-2040
LunaEl Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC2022
Sundt/RICESundtEl Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC2023-2040
DeMoss PetrieSouthwest Gas CorporationRetail Tariff
North LoopSouthwest Gas CorporationRetail Tariff
Sundt Generating Station
TEP placed in service five natural gas RICE units in December 2019, with the remaining five units scheduled to be placed in service in the first quarter of 2020, and retired Sundt Units 1 and 2 in November 2019. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the RICE units.

6

Table of Contents






Transmission and Distribution
TEP's distribution and transmission facilities are located in Arizona and New Mexico. These facilities are located on property owned by: (i) TEP; (ii) public entities; (iii) private entities; and (iv) Indian Nations. TEP's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 2,1892,232 miles of transmission lines and 7,7407,854 miles of distribution lines as of December 31, 2019.2021.
TEP's transmission facilities transmit the output from TEP’s electric generation facilities to the Tucson area and power markets. The transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, which includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces, and parts of Mexico. TEP's transmission system, together with contractual rights on other systems, enables TEP to integrate and access generation resources to meet its customerenergy load requirements.
Rates and Regulations
The ACC and the FERC each regulate portions of utility accounting practices and rates of TEP. The ACC regulates rates charged to retail customers, the siting of generation and transmission facilities, the issuance of securities, transactions with affiliated parties, and other utility matters. The ACC also enacts other regulations and policies that can affect TEP's business decisions and accounting practices. The FERC regulates rates and services for electric transmission and wholesale power sales in interstate commerce.
ACC Regulation
Renewable Energy Standard
The ACC’s RES requires Arizona utilities to increase their use of renewable energy each year until it represents at least 15% of their total annual retail energy requirements in 2025, with DG accounting for 30% of the annual renewable energy requirement. Arizona utilities must file an annual RES implementation plan for review and approval by the ACC.
Energy Efficiency Standard
Under the EE Standards, the ACC requires electric utilities to implement cost-effective programs to reduce customers' energy consumption. The EE Standards require increasing cumulative annual targeted retail kWh savings equal to 22% by 2020. As of December 31, 2019, TEP’s cumulative annual energy savings was approximately 19%.
ACC Rates
The ACC establishes rates that are designed to allow a regulated utility recovery of its cost of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investment. Retail Rates are generally established in rate case proceedings. TEP's last rate case proceeding was finalized in 2017. TEP is currently in a new rate case proceeding which began in 2019 and is expected to be finalized in 2020.
As a result of past regulatory decisions, TEP has cost recovery mechanisms that allow for more timely recovery of certain costs between rate case proceedings. These mechanisms are generally reset annually through separate filings with the ACC. TEP's cost recovery mechanisms include:
PPFAC — a usage-based charge or credit that reflects changes in energy costs that are not recovered through base rates established in a rate case.
REST — a usage-based charge that recovers the cost of complying with the RES.
DSM — a usage-based charge that recovers the cost of energy efficiency programs that are designed to help TEP comply with the EE Standards.
LFCR — a usage-based charge that partially offsets the revenue TEP loses when customers reduce their bills as a result of energy efficiency programs and DG system installations.
ECA — a usage-based charge that recovers certain costs incurred at TEP's generation stations to comply with environmental regulations.
See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Factors Affecting Results of Operations and Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on TEP's current rate case proceeding and cost recovery mechanisms.

7

Table of Contents






ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The EPA regulates, or has the authority to regulate, the amount of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2), particulate matter, mercury, and other by-products produced by generation facilities. TEP may incur added costs to comply with future changes in federal and state environmental laws, regulations, and permit requirements at its generation facilities. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to a range of interpretations, which may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Because these laws and regulations continue to evolve, TEP is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and consolidated financial results. TEP expects the recovery of the cost of environmental compliance through Retail Rates.
Refer to Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Form 10-K for additional information related to environmental laws and regulations as well as environmental compliance capital expenditures. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the Broadway-Pantano site.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
In October 2015, the EPA released the final ruleHUMAN CAPITAL
TEP strives to create a positive environment for the 8-hour U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone (O3). The EPA lowered the standard from 75 parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb. If an area does not meet the standard, the area is designated as a “non-attainment”its employees through its values and needs to develop a plan to bring the air-shed into compliance. A “non-attainment” designation may slow economic growth in the region and impact TEP's ability to site new local generation. Arizona submitted recommendations for area designations (attainment, non-attainment, or unclassified) to the EPA in September 2016. The EPA completed all area designations as of July 2018. The majority of Arizona counties, including Pima, were designated as "attainment" or "unclassified" except for portions of Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yuma counties.
In 2018, Pima County exceeded the 2015 NAAQS standard for O3 at one monitoring location. If the county continues to exceed the standard, the state could recommend an O3 non-attainment designation for Pima County during the next review period.
Effluent Limitation Guidelines
In 2015, as part of the Clean Water Act, the EPA published the final Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELG) setting standards and limitations for steam electric generation facility wastewater discharges. The ELG rule establishes new or additional requirements for wastewater streams associated with fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization, flue gas mercury control, and gasification of fuels such as coal and petroleum coke. In August 2017, in response to legal challenges, the EPA announced it began rulemaking proceedings to potentially revise the 2015 ELGs. In September 2017, the EPA postponed the earliest ELG compliance date for these waste streams from November 1, 2018 until November 1, 2020. In November 2019, the EPA published a proposed ELG rule revision in the Federal Register.
With the exception of Four Corners, none of TEP's owned steam electric generation facilities are subject to the ELG standards. With regard to Four Corners, until the EPA finalizes the proposed rule revisions, it is unclear how the revision will affect this facility.
EMPLOYEES
initiatives. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had 1,5871,719 employees, of which approximately 675 are794 were represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 1116 (IBEW). The current collective bargaining agreements between the IBEW and TEP expire in July 2022 with wages in effect through December 2022. TEP also engages with independent contractors in the ordinary course of its business as necessary.

Governance and Culture

TEP believes that the foundation for a diverse and inclusive work environment starts with the Executive Officers and Board of Directors' active involvement in tracking the Company's goals and objectives. TEP incorporates diversity, equity, and inclusion metrics and sustainability targets into its annual goals, which align these objectives with employee compensation. TEP's business strategy is intended to help employees thrive through a commitment to adapting to change, investing in continuous learning, and promoting collaboration, inclusion, and diversity, while deepening the Company's safety culture.
TEP's compliance team and Board of Directors review the Company's Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (Code) annually and make updates based on direct feedback from employees. The Code serves as TEP's ethical compass and expressly states that the Company will not tolerate certain behaviors including: (i) retaliation; (ii) discrimination; (iii) harassment; or (iv) abuse of positions of trust for personal gain. The Code is intended to help TEP create a safe and respectful workplace where employees feel valued and secure.
8
9








Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Diversity, equity, and inclusion are an integral part of TEP’s vision and values. TEP values an inclusive culture and the unique contributions, perspectives, and experiences of its employees. Based on its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, TEP implemented unconscious bias training for all employees and conducted workshops to encourage employees to think inclusively. TEP continues to identify and focus on behaviors that build strong and positive relationships at work to support an environment of thriving employees.
Business Resource Groups
The Company supports employee participation in Business Resource Groups (BRG), which are voluntary, employee-led groups that have established missions, goals, and practices that support career development and employee engagement and align with TEP's business priorities. Participants share ideas and issues to help promote an inclusive, equitable, and respectful workplace. Examples of BRGs that provide professional networking opportunities at TEP include:
Veterans in Energy — dedicated to: (i) building relationships between its members; (ii) providing support and mentorship for military veterans and families; and (iii) promoting engagement and retention of military veteran employees.
Women in Energy — dedicated to: (i) inspiring women in their professional growth; (ii) developing leadership qualities in women; and (iii) promoting engagement of women and diverse representation and thought.
Workforce Pipeline
TEP's workforce pipeline initiatives center on attracting, engaging, and developing a diverse workforce. Many of these efforts are specifically geared towards investing in: (i) underserved and minority students, from elementary schools through post-graduate studies; (ii) individuals with disabilities; and (iii) military veterans.
TEP is a Troops to Energy Jobs employer that works with the Center for Energy Workforce Development to match military skills with open positions in a variety of fields within the Company. TEP has sponsored numerous military internships for separating or retiring service members in partnership with Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, among other military bases. As of December 31, 2021, 12% of TEP's employees were military veterans.
INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Executive Officers, who are elected annually by TEP’s Board of Directors, acting at the direction of the Board of Directors of UNS Energy, as of January 1, 2020,2022, are as follows:
NameAgePosition(s) HeldExecutive Officer Since
Susan M. Gray (1)
49President and Chief Executive Officer2015
Frank P. Marino (1)
57Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2013
Todd C. Hixon (1)
55Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary2011
Erik B. Bakken49Vice President, System Operations and Energy Resources2018
Dallas J. Dukes54Vice President, Customer Experience, Programs and Pricing2019
Cynthia A. Garcia54Vice President, Energy Delivery2020
Catherine E. Ries62Vice President of Talent2007
Michael E. Sheehan54Vice President of Strategic Planning and Energy Acquisition2020
Mary Jo Smith64Vice President and Policy Advisor2015
Morgan C. Stoll51Vice President and Chief Information Officer2016
Martha B. Pritz60Treasurer2017
Name Age Position(s) Held Executive Officer Since
David G. Hutchens 53 Chief Executive Officer 2007
Susan M. Gray (1)
 47 President and Chief Operating Officer 2015
Frank P. Marino (1)
 55 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2013
Todd C. Hixon (1)
 53 Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary, and Chief Compliance Officer 2011
Erik B. Bakken 47 Vice President, System Operations and Environmental 2018
Dallas J. Dukes 52 Vice President, Energy Programs and Pricing 2019
Cynthia A. Garcia 52 Vice President, Energy Delivery 2020
Mark C. Mansfield 64 Vice President, Energy Resources 2012
Catherine E. Ries 60 Vice President, Customer and Human Resources 2007
Michael E. Sheehan 52 Vice President, Resource Planning, Fuels, and Wholesale Marketing 2020
Mary Jo Smith 62 Vice President, Public Policy 2015
Morgan C. Stoll 49 Vice President and Chief Information Officer 2016
Martha B. Pritz 58 Treasurer 2017
(1)Member of the TEP Board of Directors. The directors of TEP are elected annually by TEP's sole shareholder, UNS Energy, acting at the direction of the Board of Directors of UNS Energy.
(1)
Member of the TEP Board of Directors. The directors of TEP are elected annually by TEP's sole shareholder, UNS Energy, acting at the direction of the Board of Directors of UNS Energy.
SEC REPORTS AVAILABLE
TEP makes available its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practical after it electronically files or furnishes them to the SEC. The SEC maintains a website at https://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
10


Table of Contents
regarding issuers that file electronically. TEP's reports are also available free of charge through TEP’s website at https://www.tep.com/investor-information/.
TEP is providing the address of its website solely for the information of investors and does not intend for the address to be an active link. The information contained on TEP’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, any report or other filing by TEP filed with the SEC.

9








ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The business and financial results of TEP are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below. These risks and uncertainties fall primarily into five major categories: revenues, regulatory, environmental, financial, and operational. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to TEP or that are not currently believed by TEP to be material may also negatively impact TEP’s business and financial results.
REVENUES
A significant decrease in the demand for electricity in TEP's service area would negatively impact retail sales and adversely affect results of operations, net income, and cash flows at TEP.
National and local economic conditions have a significant impact on customer growth and overall retail sales in TEP’s service area. TEP anticipates an annual customer growth rate of 1% for the next five years.
Research and development activities are ongoing for new technologies that produce power and reduce power consumption. These technologies include renewable energy, customer-sited DG, appliances, equipment, batteryenergy storage, and control systems. Continued development and use of these technologies and compliance with the ACC's EE Standards and RES continue to have a negative impact on TEP’s use per customer and overall retail sales. TEP's use per customer declined by an average of 2%1% per year from 20152017 through 2019.2021.
The revenues, results of operations, and cash flows of TEP are seasonal and are subject to weather conditions and customer usage patterns, which are beyond the Company’s control.
Retail Sales
TEP typically earns the majority of its operating revenue and net income in the third quarter because retail customers increase their air conditioning usage during the summer. Conversely, first quarter net income is typically limited by relatively mild winter weather in TEP's retail service territory. CoolUnseasonably cool summers or warm winters may reduce customer usage, negatively affecting operating revenues, cash flows, and net income by reducing sales.
Production Tax Credits
Electricity generated from TEP's wind-powered facility depends heavily on wind conditions and turbine availability. If such conditions are unfavorable, the facility’s electricity generation and associated PTCs may be reduced, negatively affecting cash tax payments and net income.
TEP is dependent on a small number of customers for a significant portion of future revenues. A reduction in the electricity sales to these customers would negatively affect results of operations, net income, and cash flows at TEP.
TEP’s ten largest customers represented 10% of total revenues in 2019.2021. TEP sells electricity to mines, military installations, and other large commercial and industrial customers. Retail sales volumes and revenues from these customers could decline as a result of, among other things: global, national, and local economic conditions; curtailments of customer operations due to unfavorable market conditions; military base reorganization or closure decisions by the federal government; the effects of energy efficiency and DG;efficiency; or the decision by customers to self-generate all or a portion of their energy needs. A reduction in retail kWh sales by any one of TEP’s ten largest customers would negatively affect the Company's results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
11


Table of Contents
REGULATORY
TEP's business is significantly impacted by government legislation, regulation and oversight. TEP's inability to recover its costs, earn a reasonable return on its investments, or comply with current regulations would negatively affect its results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
TEP's financial condition is influenced by how regulatory authorities, including the ACC and the FERC, establish the rates TEP can charge customers and authorize rates of return, common equity levels, and the amount of costs that may be recovered from customers. The Company's ability to timely obtain rate adjustments that provide TEP with the opportunity to earn authorized rates of return depends upon timely regulatory action under applicable statutes and regulations, and cannot be guaranteed.
ACC—The ACC is a constitutionally created body composed of five elected commissioners thatand has jurisdiction over rates for retail customers. Commissioners are elected state-wide for staggered four-year terms and are limited to serving two consecutive terms. As a result, the composition of the commission,ACC, and therefore its policies, are subject to change every two years.
FERC—The FERC has jurisdiction over rates for electric transmission in interstate commerce and rates for wholesale sales of electric power, including terms and prices of transmission services and sales of electricity at wholesale.
Owners and operators of bulk power systems, including TEP, are subject to mandatory reliability standards developed and enforced by NERC and subject to the oversight of the FERC. Compliance with modified or new reliability standards may

10








subject TEP to higher operating costs and increased capital costs. Failure to comply with the mandatory reliability standards could subject TEP to sanctions, including substantial monetary penalties.
Changes made to legislation, regulation, or regulatory structure could negatively affect TEP's results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
TEP incurs costs to comply with legislative and regulatory requirements and initiatives, such as those relating to clean energy requirements, the deployment of distributed energy resources, and implementation of programs for demand response, customer energy efficiency, and electric vehicles. New initiatives or changes to existing requirements could arise in the future through legislative, regulatory, or other initiatives (including ballot initiatives) on either a federal or state level.
In 2018, the ACC opened rulemaking dockets to evaluate possible modifications to various state energy policies, including renewable energy goals and retail competition for generation services. In 2019, the ACC staff prepared a draft of rules that, if adopted, would change the renewable energy goals requiring Arizona regulated utilities to acquire 45% of the retail energy it sells from renewable generation by 2035. Increases to the renewable energy goals could accelerate the Company's long-term resource diversification strategy and increase capital expenditures and operating expenses. TEP's ability to recover costs, including its investments, associated with these and other legislative and regulatory initiatives will, in large part, depend on the final form of legislative or regulatory requirements. Further increases to rates could negatively affect the affordability of the rates charged to customers, which may negatively affect TEP’s results of operations, net income, and cash flows. In addition,2019 and 2020, the ACC staff and two commissioners have prepared different drafts ofdiscussed draft rules for retail competition rules for utilities in Arizona.generation services. These rules have not been officially proposed, but if such rules were adopted, retail competition could have a negative impact on the Company's retail sales. TEP cannot predict the final outcome of these proposals. The adoption of any new policies or rules would be subject to rulemaking proceedings at the ACC.
Changes in tax regulation may negatively affect the results of operations, net income, and cash flows of TEP.
The Company is subject to taxation by the various taxing authorities at the federal, state and local levels where it does business. Legislation or regulation could be enacted by any of these governmental authorities which could affect the Company’s tax positions.this matter.
ENVIRONMENTAL
TEP is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations that may increase its cost of operations or expose it to environmental-related litigation and liabilities.
Numerous federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations affect present and future operations. Those laws and regulations include rules regarding air emissions of conventional pollutants and greenhouse gases, water use, wastewater discharges, solid waste, hazardous waste, and management of CCR.
These laws and regulations can contribute to higher capital expenditures and operating and other costs,expenses, particularly with regard to enforcement efforts focused on existing generation facilities and compliance standards related to new and existing generation facilities. These laws and regulations generally require TEP to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental licenses, permits, authorizations, and other approvals. Both public officials and private individuals may seek to enforce applicable environmental laws and regulations. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in litigation, the imposition of fines, penalties, and a requirementrequirements by regulatory authorities for costly equipment upgrades.
Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and new environmental laws and regulations may be adopted or become applicable to the Company's facilities. Increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions from revised or additional regulation could have a negative effect on TEP's results of operations, particularly if those costs are not timely and fully recoverable from TEP customers. TEP’s obligation to comply with these laws and regulations as a participant or owner in regulated facilities like Springerville, San Juan, and Four Corners, coupled with the financial impact of future climate change legislation, other environmental regulations, and other business considerations, could jeopardize the economic viability of these generation facilities. Additionally, these regulations may jeopardize continued generation facility operations or the ability of
12


Table of Contents
individual participants to meet their obligations and willingness to continue their participation in these facilities potentially resulting in an increased operational cost for the remaining participants.
TEP also is contractually obligated to pay a portion of the environmental reclamation costs incurred at generation facilities in which it has a minority interest and is obligated to pay similar costs at the mines that supply these generation facilities. While TEP has recorded the portion of its costs that can be determined at this time, the total costs for final reclamation at these sites are unknown and could be substantial.

11








FINANCIAL
Early closure of TEP's coal-fired generation facilities could result in TEP recognizing regulatory impairments or increased cost of operations if recovery of TEP's remaining investments in such facilities and the costs associated with early closures are not permitted through rates charged to customers.
Some of TEP's remaining coal-fired generation facilities willmay be closed before the end of their useful lives in response to economic conditions and/or recent orchanges in regulation, including any future changes into the ACC's energy rules and/or environmental regulation, including potential regulation relating to GHG emissions.regulations. If any of the coal-fired generation facilities from which TEP obtains power are closed prior to the end of their useful life,lives, TEP may need to seek regulatory recovery of the remaining net book value and could incur added expenses relating to accelerated depreciation and amortization, decommissioning, reclamation, and cancellation of long-term coal contracts of such generation facilities. As of December 31, 2019,2021, the net book value of TEP's regulatory assets balance related to its earlyin service coal-fired generation retirement costsfacilities was $68 million. In 2019, TEP filed a general rate case with the ACC which includes a request to recover certain early retirement costs related to Navajo and Sundt Units 1 and 2.$1.1 billion.
Volatility or disruptions in the financial markets, rising interest rates, or unanticipated financing needs, could increase TEP's financing costs, limit access to the credit or bank markets, affect the Company's ability to comply with financial covenants in debt agreements, and increase TEP's pension funding obligations. Such outcomes may negatively affect liquidity and TEP's ability to carry out the Company's financial strategy.
We rely on access to bank markets and capital markets as a significant source of liquidity and for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flows from TEP's operations. Market disruptions such as those experienced in 2008, 2009, and 20092020 in the United States and abroad may increase the Company's cost of borrowing or negatively affect TEP's ability to access sources of liquidity needed to finance the Company's operations and satisfy its obligations as they become due. These disruptions may include turmoil in the financial services industry, including substantial uncertainty surrounding particular lending institutions and counterparties we do business with, unprecedented volatility in the markets, and general economic downturns in TEP's utility service territories. If TEP is unable to access credit at reasonable rates, or if the Company's borrowing costs dramatically increase, TEP's ability to finance its operations, meet debt obligations, and execute its financial strategy could be negatively affected.
Increases in short-term interest rates would increase the cost of borrowings under TEP's credit facilities.facility. In addition, changing market conditions could negatively affect the market value of assets held in its pension and other postretirement defined benefit plans and may increase the amount and accelerate the timing of required future funding contributions.
Generation facility closings or changes in power flows into TEP's service territory could require us to redeem or defease some or all of the tax-exempt bonds issued for the Company's benefit, which could result in increased financing costs.
TEP has financed a substantial portion of utility plant assets with the proceeds of pollution control revenue bonds and industrial development revenue bonds issued by governmental authorities. Interest on these bonds is, subject to certain exceptions, excluded from gross income for federal tax purposes. This tax-exempt status is based, in part, on continued use of the assets for pollution control purposes or the local furnishing of power within TEP’s two-county retail service area.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, there were outstanding approximately $257$177 million aggregate principal amount of tax-exempt bonds that financed pollution control expenditures at TEP’s generation facilities. In October 2020, $80 million aggregate principal amount of bonds mature.Springerville. The remaining bonds may be redeemed at par commencing in the first quarter ofon or after March 1, 2022. The bonds would be subject to early redemption should certain generating facilities be retired and dismantled prior to maturity or the first redemption date.
In addition, as of December 31, 2019,2021, there were outstanding approximately $207$107 million aggregate principal amount of tax-exempt bonds that financed local furnishing facilities.facilities, which include $16 million in bonds callable at par on or after June 1, 2022 and the balance callable at par on or after March 1, 2023. Depending on changes that may occur to the regional generation mix in the desert southwest, to the regional bulk transmission network, or to the demand for retail power in TEP’s local service area, it is possible that TEP would no longer qualify as a local furnisher of power within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code. If TEP could no longer qualify as a local furnisher of power, all of TEP’s tax-exempt local furnishing bonds could be subject to mandatory early redemption by TEP or defeasance to the earliest possible redemption date, and TEP could be required to pay additional amounts if interest on such bonds werewas no longer tax-exempt. TEP has $100 million in aggregate principal bonds that may be redeemed at par on or after October 2020. The remaining bonds may be redeemed at par commencing on dates ranging from first quarter of 2022 to first quarter of 2023.

12
13


Table of Contents






OPERATIONAL
The operation of generation facilities and transmission and distribution systems involves risks and uncertainties that could result in reduced generation capability or unplanned outages that could negatively affect TEP’s results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
The operation of generation facilities and transmission and distribution systems involves certain risks and uncertainties, including equipment breakdown or failures, fires, weather, and other hazards, interruption of fuel supply, and lower than expected levels of efficiency or operational performance.performance, and/or disruptions in operations due to a labor shortage. Unprecedented global supply chain challenges including lead time impacts, pricing volatility, and other market trends increase the risk that TEP’s operations could be negatively impacted and/or TEP’s capital spending could be increased. Unplanned outages, including extensions of planned outages due to equipment failures or other complications, occur from time to time. They are an inherent risk of the Company's business and can cause damage to its reputation. If TEP’s generation facilities or transmission and distribution systems operate below expectations, TEP’s operating results could be negatively affected and/or TEP's capital spending could be increased.
In addition, as coal-fired generation facilities are closed, the economic viability of coal mines and coal suppliers may be jeopardized. To date, several coal suppliers have declared bankruptcy and coal mines have been closed. As additional coal-fired generation facilities are closed, the availability of sufficient coal supplies could decrease and prices may increase, which could, in turn, negatively affect the viability of our remaining coal-fired generation facilities.
The operation of generation facilities and transmission systems on Indiantribal lands may create operational and financial risks for TEP that, if realized, could negatively affect TEP’s results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
Certain jointly-owned facilities and portions of TEP's transmission lines are located on Indiantribal lands pursuant to leases, land easements, or other rights-of-way that are effective for specified periods. TEP is unable to predict the final outcomes of pending and future approvals by the applicable sovereign governing bodies with respect to the cost of renewals and continued access to these leases, land easements, and rights-of-way. If pending and future approvals are not obtained and if continued access to the facilities is not granted, it could negatively affect TEP's results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
TEP receives power from certain generation facilities that are jointly-owned with, or operated by, third parties. Therefore, TEP may not have the ability to affect the management or operations at such facilities which could negatively affect TEP’s results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
Certain of the generation facilities from which TEP receives power are jointly-owned with, or operated by, third parties. TEP does not have the sole discretion to affect the management or operations at such facilities. As a result of this reliance on other operators, TEP may not be able to ensure the proper management of the operations and maintenance of such generation facilities. Further, TEP may have limited ability to determine how best to manage the changing economic conditions or environmental requirements that may affect such facilities. A divergence in the interests of TEP and the co-owners or operators, as applicable, of such facilities could negatively impact the business and operations of TEP.
The effects of climate change may create operational and financial risks for TEP that, if realized, could negatively affect TEP's results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
Climate change may impact regional and global weather conditions and result in extreme weather events, including high temperatures, severe thunderstorms, drought, and wildfires. Changes in weather conditions or extreme weather events in TEP’s service territory or affecting TEP's remote generation facilities or transmission systemand distribution systems may lead to service outages and business interruptions, which could result in an increase in capital expenditures and operating expenses. Any increases in severity and frequency of weather-related system outages could affect TEP's operations and system reliability. Although physical utility assets have been constructed and are operated and maintained to withstand severe weather, there can be no assurance that they will successfully do so in all circumstances. In addition, changes in weather conditions or extreme weather events outside of TEP's service territory could result in higher wholesale energy prices, insurance premiums, and other costs, which could negatively impact TEP's business and operations. Any of these situations could have a negative impact on TEP's results of operations, net income, and cash flows.
TEP is subject to physical attacks which could have a negative impact on the Company's business and results of operations.
TEP’s generation, transmission, and distribution facilities are critical to the provision of electric service to our customers and provide the framework for our service infrastructure. TEP is facing a heightened risk of physical attacks on the Company's electric systems. The Company's electric generation, transmission, and distribution assets are geographically dispersed and are often in rural or unpopulated areas which makes it especially difficult to adequately detect, defend from, and respond to such
14


Table of Contents
attacks. The Company relies on the continued operation of its network infrastructure, which is part of an interconnected regional grid. Any significant interruption of these assets could prevent the Company from fulfilling its critical business

13








functions including delivering energy to customers. Security threats continue to evolve and adapt. TEP and our third-party vendors have been subject to, and will likely continue to be subject to, attempts to disrupt operations. Despite implementation of security measures, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to prevent the disruption of our operations.
If, despite TEP's security measures, a significant physical attack occurred, the Company could: (i) have operations disrupted and/or property damaged; (ii) experience loss of revenues, response costs, and other financial loss; and (iii) be subject to increased regulation, litigation, and damage to the Company's reputation. Any of these outcomes could have a negative impact on TEP's business and results of operations.
TEP is subject to cyber-attacks which could have a negative impact on the Company's business and results of operations.
Cybercrime, which includes the use of malware, computer viruses, and other means for disruption or unauthorized access has increased in frequency, scope, and potential impact in recent years. The Company relies on the continued operation of sophisticated digital information technology systems and network infrastructure, which are part of an interconnected regional grid. TEP's operations technology systems face a heightened risk of cyber-attack due to the critical nature of the infrastructure, the Company's connectivity to the Internet, and inherent vulnerability to disability or failures due to hacking, viruses, acts of war or terrorism, and other types of data security breaches.
TEP's information technology systems and network infrastructure have been subject, and will likely continue to be subject, to cyber-attacks from foreign or domestic sources attempting to gain unauthorized access to information and/or information systems or to disrupt utility operations through computer viruses and phishing attempts either directly or indirectly through its material vendors or related third parties. Furthermore, the Company's utility business requires access to sensitive customer data, including personal and credit information, in the ordinary course of business.
If, despite TEP's security measures, a significant cyber or data breach occurred, the Company could: (i) have operations disrupted, customer information stolen, and general business system and process interruption or compromise, including preventing TEP from servicing customers, collecting revenues or the recording, processing and/or reporting financial information correctly; (ii) experience loss of revenues, response costs, and other financial loss; and (iii) be subject to increased regulation, litigation, and damage to the Company's reputation. Any of these outcomes could have a negative impact on TEP's business and results of operations. To date we have not experienced any material breaches or disruptions to our network, information systems, or our service operations.

The widespread outbreak of an illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis, including the COVID-19 pandemic, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
TEP could be negatively impacted by the widespread outbreak of an illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis that results in economic and trade disruptions, including the disruption of global supply chains. The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the economy on a global, national, and local level, disrupted global supply chains, and created volatility and disruption of financial markets. Responses from governmental authorities and companies to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have affected economic activity through various containment measures including, among others, business closures, work stoppages, quarantine and work-from-home guidelines, limiting capacity at public spaces and events, vaccination requirements, and/or restrictions of global and regional travel.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and these governmental authority and company responses, TEP could experience, and in some cases has experienced, among other things, workforce availability challenges, including from COVID-19 infections, quarantining, or concerns with vaccination or testing requirements, and the risks or uncertainties associated with plans for the return for many employees from remote to on-site work on a full-time or hybrid basis. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TEP’s operational and financial performance, including the ability to execute business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, the ability to obtain external financing, the continuation of workforce availability challenges, and the timing of regulatory actions, will depend on factors beyond our control, including the duration, spread, and severity of the pandemic, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions resume, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. An extended period of global supply chain and/or economic disruption, government-mandated actions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and labor shortages could materially affect TEP’s business, results of operations, access to sources of liquidity, and financial condition.
15


Table of Contents
GENERAL RISK FACTORS
Changes in tax regulation may negatively affect the results of operations, net income, and cash flows of TEP.
The Company is subject to taxation by the various taxing authorities at the federal, state and local levels where it does business. Legislation or regulation could be enacted by any of these governmental authorities, which could affect the Company’s tax positions.
The failure to attract, retain, and manage an appropriately qualified workforce could negatively impact TEP’s business and results of operations.
TEP’s business is dependent on its ability to attract, retain, and manage qualified personnel, including key executive officers and skilled professional and technical employees and contractors. Certain events and conditions, such as an aging workforce without available replacements, the unavailability of contract resources, and the need to negotiate collective bargaining agreements with union employees, may lead to operating challenges, including lack of resources, loss of knowledge base, time required for skill development, and labor disruptions. If TEP is unable to successfully attract, retain, and manage an appropriately qualified workforce, its business and results of operations could be negatively affected.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
TEP's corporate headquarters is owned by TEP and located in Tucson, Arizona. Operational support facilities for Tucson operations are owned by TEP and located in Tucson, Arizona.
TEP has land easements for transmission facilities related to San Juan, Four Corners, and Navajo located on tribal lands of the Zuni, Navajo, and Tohono O’odham Nations. Four Corners and Navajo are located on properties held under land easements from the United States and under leases from the Navajo Nation. TEP, individually and in conjunction with PNM, acquired land rights, land easements, and leases for San Juan's generation facilities, transmission lines, and water diversion facility located on land owned by the Navajo Nation. TEP, in conjunction with PNM and Samchully Power & Utilities 1 LLC, holds an undivided ownership interest in the property on which Luna is located.
TEP’s rights under various land easements and leases may be subject to defects such as:
possible conflicting grants or encumbrances due to the absence of, or inadequacies in, the recording laws or record systems of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Nations;
possible inability of TEP to legally enforce its rights against adverse claims and the Indian Nations without Congressional consent; or
failure or inability of the Indian Nations to protect TEP’s interests in the land easements and leases from disruption by the U.S. Congress, Secretary of the Interior, or other adverse claims.

14








These possible defects have not interfered, and are not expected to materially interfere, with TEP’s interest in and operation of its facilities.
TEP's rights under land easements expire at various times in the future and renewal action by the applicable tribetribal or federal agencies will beare required. The ultimate cost of renewal for certain of the rights-of-way for the Company's transmission lines is uncertain. The principal owned and leased generation, distribution, and transmission facilities of TEP are described in Part I, Item 1. Business, Overview of Business and such descriptions are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
TEP is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company believes such normal and routine litigation will not have a material impact on its operations
16


Table of Contents
or financial results. TEP is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties, and other costs in substantial amounts on TEP.
See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

17
15








PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
TEP’s common stock is wholly-owned by UNS Energy and is not listed for trading on any stock exchange.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[Reserved]
18
The following table provides selected financial data for the years 2015 through 2019:
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Income Statement Data         
Operating Revenues$1,418,338
 $1,432,618
 $1,340,935
 $1,234,995
 $1,306,544
Net Income186,515
 188,323
 176,668
 124,438
 127,794
Balance Sheet Data         
Total Utility Plant, Net$4,534,896
 $4,160,640
 $3,768,702
 $3,782,806
 $3,558,229
Total Assets5,489,157
 5,159,207
 4,590,249
 4,449,989
 4,249,478
Long-Term Debt, Net1,522,087
 1,615,252
 1,354,423
 1,453,072
 1,451,720
Non-Current Finance Lease Obligations67,316
 19,773
 28,519
 39,267
 55,324


16








ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis explains the results of operations, the financial condition, and the outlook for TEP. It includes the following:
overviewoutlook and strategies;
factors affecting our results of operations;
results of operations;
liquidity and capital resources, including: (i)including capital expenditures; (ii) contractual obligations;expenditures and (iii) environmental matters;
critical accounting policies and estimates; and
new accounting standards issued and not yet adopted.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.
This section of this Form 10-K primarily discusses 20192021 and 20182020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 20192021 and 2018.2020. Discussions of 20172019 activity and year-to-year comparisons between 20182020 and 20172019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in Part II, Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. For information on factors that may cause our actual future results to differ from those we currently anticipate, see Forward-Looking Information at the front of this report and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information.Factors.
References in this discussion and analysis to "we" and "our" are to TEP.
OVERVIEW
Outlook and StrategiesOUTLOOK AND STRATEGIES
TEP's financial performance and outlook are affected by many factors, including: (i) global, national, regional, and local economic conditions; (ii) volatility in the financial markets; (iii) environmental laws and regulations; and (iv) other regulatory and legislative actions. Our plans and strategies include:
Achieving constructive outcomes in our regulatory proceedings that will provide us: (i) recovery of our full cost of service and an opportunity to earn an appropriate return on our rate base investments; and (ii) updated rates that provide more accurate price signals and a more equitable allocation of costs to our customers; and (iii) the ability to continue providing safe, affordable, and reliable service.customers.
Continuing to focus on our long-term resource diversification strategy, including transitioningtransition from carbon intensivecarbon-intensive sources to a more sustainable energy portfolio, while providing reliability and rate stability for our customers, mitigating environmental impacts, complying with regulatory requirements, leveraging and improving our existing utility infrastructure, and maintaining financial strength. ThisIn 2020, we announced our long-term strategy includes achieving 30% of our customers’goal to reduce carbon emissions by exiting coal-fired generation over the next decade and increasing renewable energy needs with non-carbon emitting resources eight years ahead of our 2030 goal. We are currently working on new long-termand energy storage. These goals based on carbon emission reductions as part of our integrated resource plan which we plan to file with the ACC during 2020. This resource strategy may be impacted by various federal and state energy policy proposalspolicies, including policies currently under consideration in Arizona.consideration.
Focusing on our core utility business through operational excellence, promoting economic development in our service territory, investing in infrastructure to ensure reliable service, and maintaining a strong community presence.
CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS—COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic caused changes in consumer and business behavior and disrupted economic activity in TEP’s service territory. We activated our business continuity plans and we continue to evaluate and assess protocols and plans as pandemic conditions continue to evolve. Our protocols and plans are intended to support the continued delivery of safe and reliable service to our customers and the communities we serve.
We cannot predict the ultimate effects of the pandemic on the economy or our service territory. We continue to monitor developments affecting our workforce, customers, suppliers, and operations. We have not experienced a material impact to our results of operations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
19


Performance - 20192021 Compared with 20182020
TEP reported net income of $187$201 million in 20192021 compared with $188$191 million in 2018.2020. The decreaseincrease of $1$10 million, or 1%5%, was primarily due to:
$1131 million in higher net revenue from an increase in rates as approved in the 2020 Rate Order; partially offset by unfavorable weather compared to 2020, which included record heat;
$9 million in lower income tax expense primarily due to PTCs earned as a result of Oso Grande being placed in service in May 2021;
$8 million in higher revenue due to the 2019 FERC Rate Case proposed settlement triggering recognition of revenue previously reserved for refund, which included $6 million in transmission services provided in 2020 and 2019;
$5 million increase in expected return on pension plan assets; and
$5 million in higher wholesale long-term sales primarily due to an increase in sales volume.
The increase was partially offset by:
$24 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense due to an increase in asset base; and an increase in depreciation rates and amortization as a result of the 2020 Rate Order;

17








$1021 million in higher interest expense related to a debt issuance in November 2018;operations and
$8 million maintenance expenses due to an increase in planned generation outages in 2021 and employee wages and benefits expense; and
$5 million in lower retail revenue primarilyAFUDC due to a decrease in usage related to unfavorable weather.
The decrease was partially offset by:
$8 million in higher AFUDC due to an increase ineligible construction projects;
$7 million in lower income tax expense primarily due to EDIT amortization true-ups related to the TCJA and the recognition of additional AMT credits related to a revision in tax law guidance;
$7 million increase in value of company-owned life insuranceexpenditures as a result of favorable market conditions; andOso Grande being placed in service.
$6 million in lower operations and maintenance expense related to planned generation outages in 2018 not recurring in 2019.

FACTORS AFFECTING RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Several factors affect our current and future results of operations. The most significant factors are related to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory matters, generation resource diversification,strategy, and weather patterns.
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance depends on certain developments, including: (i) the duration of the declared health emergencies; (ii) actions by governmental authorities and regulators; (iii) impacts on our customers, employees, and vendors; and (iv) actions by us to assist our customers through the pandemic. These developments are continuously evolving and are challenging to predict. Areas currently impacted, and areas we expect to continue to be impacted, that may have an effect on our results of operations, cash flows, and earnings are noted below.
Retail Sales
The COVID-19 pandemic changed consumer and business behavior as a result of safety measures taken to combat the spread. In 2020, energy usage by our commercial and industrial customers decreased below average levels experienced in prior periods and energy usage by our residential customers increased due to stay at home orders and widespread adoption of work from home practices. However, in 2021, usage began to return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic patterns. We have not experienced a significant impact on total retail sales as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Regulatory Matters
TEP isWe are subject to comprehensive regulation. The discussion below contains material developments to those matters.
2019 ACC2020 Rate CaseOrder
In April 2019, TEP filed a general rate case withDecember 2020, the ACC based onissued a test year ended December 31, 2018, to provide TEP with an opportunity to recover its full cost of service, including an appropriate return on its rate base investments, and enable TEP to continue to provide safe and reliable service.order for new rates that took effect January 1, 2021.
TEP's key proposalsProvisions of the rate case, adjusted for rebuttal testimony filed in November 2019 include:2020 Rate Order include, but are not limited to:
a non-fuel retail revenue increase of $99 million, partially offset by a reduction in base fuel revenue of approximately $39 million for a net increase of $60$58 million over test year retail revenues;
20


a 7.49%7.04% return on original cost rate base of $2.7 billion, which includes a cost of equity of 10.00%9.15% and an average cost of debt of 4.65%; and
a capital structure for rate making purposes of approximately 53% common equity and 47% long-term debt;debt.
In addition, the 2020 Rate Order established a requestsecond phase of our rate case to recover costsaddress the impact on certain communities due to the closures of changesfossil-based generation facilities (Phase 2). In January 2021, the ACC staff opened a generic docket related to this matter and will consider additional evidence or recommendations in generation resources, including: (i)Phase 2. In 2021, there was limited activity in this docket. On January 19, 2022, the retirementACC issued an order delaying Phase 2 until after the completion of Navajo and Sundt Units 1 and 2; and (ii) the replacement generation capacity associated with the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 and the installation of RICE units at Sundt;
a TEAM that would be updated for income tax changes that materially affect TEP’s authorized revenue requirement; and
a TCA mechanism, updated annually, allowing TEP to recover any changes in transmission costs approved by the FERC.
Hearings before an ALJ were held in January and February 2020. The hearing will resume in April 2020. TEP requested new rates to be implemented by May 1, 2020.generic docket. We cannot predict the timing or outcome of the proceeding.these proceedings.
2019 FERC Rate Case
In 2019, the FERC issued an order approving TEP'sour proposed OATT revisions effective August 1, 2019, subject to refund.refund and further proceedings.
Provisions of the order include, but are not limited to:
replacing TEP'sour stated transmission rates with a single forward-looking formula rate;
a 10.4% return on equity; and

18







elimination of transmission rates that are bifurcated between high-voltage and lower-voltage facilities, as well as elimination of the bifurcated loss factor rate.
The requested forward-looking formula rate is intended to allow for a more timely recovery of transmission-related costs. If this request is approved, transmission revenues would increase by $7 million. As part of the order, the FERC established hearing and settlement procedures. In February 2021, a Presiding Judge was appointed to continue the formula rate case proceeding after the settlement procedures resulted in an impasse. In August 2021, we filed an unopposed motion requesting that the Chief Judge suspend the litigation procedural schedule to allow the parties time to prepare and all revisionsfile a comprehensive settlement package, as parties in the proceeding reached a settlement in principle. The motion was granted and on December 22, 2021, the settlement agreement was filed with the FERC. On February 1, 2022, the Presiding Judge certified and recommended approval by the FERC of the proposed settlement.
Provisions of the proposed settlement include, but are not limited to:
replacing our stated transmission rates with a single forward-looking formula rate;
a 9.79% return on equity;
elimination of transmission rates that are bifurcated between high-voltage and lower-voltage facilities, as well as elimination of the bifurcated loss factor;
a direct assignment of 25% of transmission costs allocated to retail customers and 75% allocated between wholesale and retail customers beginning January 1, 2022, through the date that is the later of: (i) December 31, 2031; or (ii) the date on which we have no Industrial Development Revenue Bonds outstanding; and
a refund of the difference in rates for the period commencing August 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021.
The proposed settlement does not go into effect until final approval from the FERC is received. We cannot predict the final timing of the proceedings. All rates charged under the revised OATT inpursuant to the FERC order are subject to refund. As ofrefund until the proceeding concludes. In December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had reserved $4recognized $12 million of wholesale revenue and had $15 million of wholesale revenues reserved in Current Liabilities—Regulatory Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a result of the FERC proceedings. We cannot predict the outcome of the proceeding.
Abandoned Plant Costs
Also in May 2019, TEP filed with the FERC a request to recover through its OATT abandoned plant costs related to the abandoned Sahuarita, Arizona to Nogales, Arizona transmission line. TEP requested authorization to recover 100% of the approximately $9 million that we incurred in developing the transmission line. The filing requested that the abandoned plant costs be included in TEP's transmission rate. On September 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order allowing TEP to recover 50% of its costs in its formula rate and established hearing and settlement procedures. TEP incorporated the abandoned plant costs into our formula rate effective January 1, 2020, subject to refund. On September 26, 2019, the FERC issued an order consolidating the 2019 FERC Rate Case and Abandoned Plant Costs proceedings. TEP previously wrote off a portion of the deferred costs related to the Nogales transmission line. As of December 31, 2019, there was $4 million related to the Nogales transmission line recorded in Regulatory2021 and Other Assets—Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Federal Income Tax Legislation
Arizona Corporation Commission
In December 2017, the ACC opened a docket requesting that all regulated utilities submit proposals to address passing the benefits of the TCJA through to customers. In 2018, the ACC approved TEP’s proposal to return savings from the Company’s federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA to its customers through a combination of customer bill credits and a regulatory liability deferral that reflects the return of a portion of the savings, effective May 1, 2018 (ACC Refund Order). The refund represents the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate and an estimate of EDIT amortization that will be trued-up annually for actuals. The bill credit was designed to return the refund amount to customers based on forecasted kWh sales for the calendar year. Any over or under collected amounts are deferred to a regulatory liability or asset and will be used to adjust the following year's bill credit amounts. Customer bill credits are trued-up annually to reflect actuals for both kWh sales and EDIT amortization. The refund amounts totaled $33 million in both 2019 and 2018. TEP filed an information filing with the ACC to establish a 2020 customer refund of $35 million. The refund will be returned to customers through a combination of a customer bill credit and a regulatory liability in 2020. The customer bill credit will account for 50% of the returned savings in 2020 and through the completion of our next rate case. TEP has proposed a TEAM to return the remaining deferred balance.
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 and Liquidity and Capital Resources, Income Tax Position of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the ACC Refund Order.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
In 2018, the FERC issued orders directing TEP to either: (i) submit proposed revisions to its stated transmission rates or stated transmission revenue requirements to reflect the change in the federal corporate income tax rate as a result of the TCJA; or (ii) show cause why it should not be required to do so (FERC Refund Order). In May 2018, TEP responded to the order and the FERC approved TEP's proposal of an overall transmission rate reduction of approximately 5.3%, reflecting the lower federal tax rate, to be effective March 21, 2018. As a result, TEP recognized a reduction in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income of $1 million in 2018.
Also in 2018, the FERC issued a NOPR regarding the effect of the TCJA and related EDIT amortization. In November 2019, the FERC issued a final rule on the NOPR, which did not require TEP to update its stated transmission rates to deduct or include EDIT in its rate base. As required by the final rule, TEP's 2019 FERC Rate Case addressed the effects of the TCJA and related EDIT amortization.
See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regardingon the 2019 FERC Rate Case.
Other FERC Matters
In January 2021, the FERC Refund Order.

19







Arizona Energy Policy
In 2018, the ACC opened rulemaking docketsnotified us that it was commencing an audit to evaluate possible modificationsour compliance with: (i) the accounting requirements of the Uniform System of Accounts; and (ii) the reporting requirements of the FERC Form 1 Annual Report and Supplemental Form 3-Q Quarterly Financial Reports. The audit is covering the period from January 1, 2018 to various energy policies including existing renewable energy goals, integrated resource planning,the present. The audit is ongoing and retail competition for generation services. In 2019 and 2020, the ACC staff and two commissioners prepared different drafts of retail electric competition rules. The ACC is expected to discuss those draft rules during upcoming workshops, but such rules have not been officially proposed and no changes have been made. We anticipate that the ACC will hold additional workshops in 2020 related to retail electric competition and other energy-related policies. The adoption of new policies or rules would be subject to rulemaking proceedings at the ACC. We would seek the ACC's approval to recover any costs related to new energy policies or requirements. TEPwe cannot predict the outcome or findings, if any, of these matters or its impact on the Company's financial position or resultsFERC audit at this time.
21


Generation Resource DiversificationResources
TEP’sOur long-term strategy is to continue our shift from carbon-intensive sources to a more diverse, sustainable energy portfolio including expanding renewable energy and natural gas-fired resources while reducing reliance on coal-fired generation resources. TEP'sIn June 2020, we filed our 2020 IRP with the ACC, which provides details on our long-term strategy.
2020 IRP
Our 2020 IRP includes a goal of reducing our CO2 emissions by 80% compared to levels in 2005 by 2035. To achieve this goal, we plan to continue the retirement of older fossil-fuel resources and replace these assets with a combination of renewable resources, energy storage, and energy efficiency programs. The existing coal-fired generation fleet faces a number of uncertainties impacting the viability of continued operations, including changing state and federal law and energy policies, competition from other resources, fuel supply and land lease contract extensions, environmental regulations, and, for jointly owned facilities, the willingness of other owners to continue their participation. Given this uncertainty, TEP may consider options that include changeswe plan to exit all ownership interests in coal-fired generation facility ownership shares, unit shutdowns, orfacilities over the sale of generation assets to third-parties. TEPnext decade. We will seek regulatory recovery for amounts that would not otherwise be recovered, if any, as a result of these actions.
As of December 31, 2019, approximately 38% On February 9, 2022, the ACC acknowledged TEP’s IRP and found it to be reasonable and in the public interest. The execution of our 2020 IRP is dependent on obtaining regulatory recovery approval in future separate proceedings.
Renewable Energy Projects
In 2021, three renewable energy projects were added to our resource portfolio increasing our total renewable nominal generation capacity, including PPAs and owned utility-scale generation, to over 700 MW.
In December 2021, a 99 MW wind facility achieved commercial operation. The PPA expires in 2051.
In May 2021, Oso Grande was placed in service, adding approximately 250 MW of wind-powered electric generation.
In April 2021, a 100 MW solar facility, accompanied by 30 MW of battery storage, achieved commercial operation. The PPA expires in 2041.
We are planning to provide more than 70% of our power from renewable resources by 2035 as part of our transition to a cleaner energy portfolio. Oso Grande and the renewable PPAs provide a significant shift towards renewable generation and further decrease our dependency on coal-fired generation.
See Part I, Item 1. Business, Overview of Business and Liquidity and Capital Resources,Environmental Matters of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding generation facility operations.
Navajo Generating Station
TEP and the co-owners of Navajo retired the generation station in November 2019 and began decommissioning activities. TEP expects the majority of decommissioning activities to be completed by 2024 with monitoring activities continuing through 2054. TEP is currently recovering the capital and operating costs in base rates using a useful life of 2030 for Navajo. Due to the early retirement, TEP requested recovery of final retirement costs over a 10-year period in the 2019 Rate Case. As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of Navajo was $42 million, with estimated other related costs of $4 million.
See Note 2 and Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information regarding the early retirement of Navajo.
Sundt Generating StationArizona Energy Policy
In 2018, the Pima County DepartmentACC opened rulemaking dockets to evaluate possible modifications to various clean energy policies including existing renewable energy and energy efficiency goals, integrated resource planning, and retail competition for generation services. In 2019 and 2020, the ACC discussed draft rules related to retail electric competition. The ACC discussed those draft rules during workshops, but such rules have not been officially proposed. In 2021, a company filed an application with the ACC requesting a certificate of Environmental Qualitypublic convenience and necessity that would grant them the authority to provide competitive electric generation service to customers in our service territory. If the ACC chooses to consider this application, we would intervene in the matter and oppose the request. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter or its impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In 2020, ACC staff issued a NOPR based on clean energy rules approved TEP's air permit. Underby the air permit, TEP is allowed to placeACC. In June 2021, these rules were modified by amendments and sent back through the formal rulemaking process, resulting in service 10 RICE units. TEP placed in service five of the RICE unitsACC staff issuing a new NOPR in December 2019,2021. The rules would have required us to, among other provisions, reduce carbon emissions below certain baseline levels. The new rules would also have repealed the existing RES and EE Standards, effective following the remaining fiveconclusion of our next rate case. In January 2022, the ACC rejected the new rules, effectively ending the rule-making process. Also in January 2022, the ACC voted to open a new rule-making docket on integrated resource planning. We cannot predict the timing or outcome of this proceeding.
Production Tax Credits
PTCs are scheduled toper-kWh federal tax credits earned for electricity generated using qualified energy resources, which can be placed in service in the first quarter of 2020. In addition, TEP was required to retire Sundt Units 1 and 2 in November 2019. TEP is currently recovering the capital and operating costs in base rates using useful lives of 2028 and 2030 of Sundt Units 1 and 2, respectively. Due to the early retirement, TEP requested recovery of final retirement costs overclaimed for a 10-year period once a qualifying facility is placed in service. In 2021, the 2019 Rate Case. As of December 31, 2019, the net book value of Sundt Units 1 and 2PTC rate for electricity from wind was $26 million, with estimated other related costs of $1 million.
The RICE units are expected to balance the variability of intermittent renewable energy resources and replace 162 MW of nominal net generation capacity from Sundt Units 1 and 2, which were less efficient and lacked the quick start, fast ramp capabilities of the RICE units.
See Note 2 and Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information regarding the early retirement of Sundt Units 1 and 2.
Gila River Generating Station
In 2017, TEP entered into a 20-year tolling PPA with SRP to purchase and receive all 550 MW of capacity, power, and ancillary services from Gila River Unit 2, which included a three-year option to purchase the unit (Tolling PPA). TEP completed the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 in December 2019 for $165 million. We have requested recovery of the Gila River Unit 2 purchase in the 2019 Rate Case.

$0.025
20
22



per kWh generated. In May 2021, Oso Grande, a qualified energy resource, was placed in service.Oso Grande generated approximately $7 million in PTCs in 2021 and is expected to generate $25 million in PTCs in 2022, at anticipated production.
If actual availability of the wind turbines is below a contractually established availability factor, we earn the right to liquidated damages to partially offset the cost of operation and maintenance costs incurred. We expectrecognized a reduction in Operations and Maintenance on the additional 550 MWConsolidated Statements of capacity, power,Income of $2 million in the year ended December 31, 2021, related to Oso Grande liquidated damages. Any liquidated damages in excess of operating expenses will reduce Utility Plant—Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The PTCs and ancillary services to allow us to continue to move towardliquidated damages will mostly offset the operating expenses of Oso Grande, which is not currently in base rates.
Electricity generated from Oso Grande depends heavily on wind conditions. If such conditions vary from our long-term goal of resource diversification as it will replace coal-firedestimates, the project’s electricity generation lost due to early retirements.
See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for additional information regarding the Tolling PPA.and associated PTCs may be substantially different than forecasted.
Weather Patterns
WeatherChanging weather patterns and other factors cause seasonal fluctuations in the sales of power. TEP'sOur summer peaking load occurs during the third quarter of the year when cooling demand is higher, which results in higher revenue during suchthis period. By contrast, lower sales of power occur during the first quarterand fourth quarters of the year due to mild winter weather in our retail service territory. Seasonal fluctuations affect the comparability of our results of operations.
Interest Rates
See Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk of this Form 10-K for information regarding interest rate risksrisk and its impact on earnings.


21







RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Significant drivers of TEP's results of operations that do not have a significant impact on net income include:
Cost Recovery Mechanisms — TEP records operating revenue related to cost recovery mechanisms that allow for more timely recovery of fuel and purchase power costs and certain operations and maintenance costs between rate case proceedings. These mechanisms, which include PPFAC, REST, DSM, and TEAM are generally reset annually through separate filings with the ACC. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.
Short-Term Wholesale Sales — Revenues related to short-term wholesale sales are primarily related to ACC jurisdictional generation assets and are returned to retail customers by offsetting revenues against fuel and purchased power costs eligible for recovery through the PPFAC cost recovery mechanism.
— TEP records operating revenue related to cost recovery mechanisms that allow for more timely recovery of fuel and purchase power costs and certain operations and maintenance costs between rate case proceedings. These mechanisms, which include PPFAC, REST and DSM, are generally reset annually through separate filings with the ACC. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on cost recovery mechanisms.
Short-Term Wholesale Sales — Revenues related to short-term wholesale sales are primarily related to ACC jurisdictional generation assets and are returned to retail customers by offsetting revenues against fuel and purchased power costs eligible for recovery through the PPFAC cost recovery mechanism.
Springerville Units 3 and 4 — Operations and maintenance expenses related to Springerville Units 3 and 4 are reimbursed by Tri-State, the lessee of Springerville Unit 3, and SRP, the owner of Springerville Unit 4, through participant billings recorded in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The following discussion provides the significant driversitems that affected TEP's results of operations for the year ended 20192021 compared to 20182020 presented on a pre-tax basis.
23


Operating Revenues
The following table provides a disaggregation of Operating Revenues:
Years Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)Year Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
(in millions)20212020Percent2019Percent
Operating Revenues
Retail$1,088 $1,039 4.7 %$972 6.9 %
Wholesale, Long-Term54 34 58.8 %34 — %
Wholesale, Short-Term (1)
238 151 57.6 %200 (24.5)%
Transmission50 30 66.7 %32 (6.3)%
Springerville Units 3 and 4 Participant Billings95 78 21.8 %108 (27.8)%
Other68 93 (26.9)%72 29.2 %
Total Operating Revenues$1,593 $1,425 11.8 %$1,418 0.5 %
(1)Revenues associated with derivatives are primarily returned to retail customers by offsetting the fuel and purchase power costs eligible for recovery through the PPFAC mechanism similar to short-term wholesale sales. As a result, revenues associated with derivatives are included in Wholesale, Short-Term in the table above.
TEP reported operating revenuesOperating Revenues of $1,418$1,593 million in 20192021 compared with $1,433$1,425 million in 2018.2020. The decreaseincrease of $15$168 million, or 1%12%, was primarily due to:
$3784 million in lower fuelhigher wholesale short-term sales primarily due to: (i) an increase in price and purchase powersales volume; and (ii) an increase in capacity sales to affiliates for a tolling PPA entered into in June 2021;
$70 million in higher retail revenue primarily due to: (i) an increase in rates as approved in the 2020 Rate Order; and (ii) higher RES cost recoveries as a result of lower PPFAC rates; andhigher program expenses; partially offset by unfavorable weather compared to 2020 which included record heat;
$1120 million in lower retailhigher transmission revenue primarily due to: (i) the 2019 FERC Rate Case proposed settlement triggering recognition of revenue previously reserved for refund; and (ii) an increase in transmission volumes;
$20 million in higher wholesale long-term sales primarily due to a decreasean increase in customer usage related to unfavorable weather.sales volume;
The decrease was partially offset by:
$2419 million in higher participant billings related to Springerville Units 3 &and 4; and
$67 million in higher RES and DSM cost recoveriesother revenue due to a natural gas transportation asset management agreement entered into in 2020.
The increase was partially offset by:
$36 million in lower other revenue primarily due to decreases in: (i) LFCR revenues as a result of higher program expenses;a rate adjustment as approved in the 2020 Rate Order; and (ii) TCA related to true-ups; and
$321 million in higher short-term wholesale sales.lower retail revenue primarily due to lower fuel and purchase power recoveries due to lower volumes and a lower average cost recovery rate.
24


The following table provides key statistics impacting operating revenues:Operating Revenues:
Years Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)Year Ended
December 31,
Increase (Decrease)
(kWh in millions)20212020Percent2019Percent
Electric Sales (kWh) (1)
Retail Sales8,718 9,111 (4.3)%8,744 4.2 %
Wholesale, Long-Term (2)
837 508 64.8 %490 3.7 %
Wholesale, Short-Term5,643 5,279 6.9 %7,257 (27.3)%
Total Electric Sales15,198 14,898 2.0 %16,491 (9.7)%
Average Revenue per kWh (3)
Retail12.48 11.40 9.5 %11.12 2.5 %
Wholesale, Long Term6.46 6.76 (4.4)%6.94 (2.6)%
Wholesale, Short-Term4.15 2.84 46.1 %2.87 (1.0)%
Total Retail Customers (4)
438,357 433,421 1.1 %428,626 1.1 %
(1)These numbers represent the kWh sold to retail, long-term wholesale, and short-term wholesale customers. Management uses kWh sold to retail and wholesale customers to monitor electricity usage.
 Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease) 
Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease)
(kWh in millions)2019 2018 Percent 2017 Percent
Electric Sales (kWh)
         
Retail Sales8,744
 8,900
 (1.8)% 8,926
 (0.3)%
Wholesale Sales, Long-Term490
 424
 15.6 % 587
 (27.8)%
Wholesale Sales, Short-Term7,257
 6,279
 15.6 % 3,630
 73.0 %
Total Electric Sales16,491
 15,603
 5.7 % 13,143
 18.7 %
          
Average Revenue per kWh (Cents/kWh)
         
Retail11.12
 11.48
 (3.1)% 11.39
 0.8 %
Wholesale3.13
 3.46
 (9.5)% 3.21
 7.8 %
     

    
Total Retail Customers428,626
 425,044
 0.8 % 422,366
 0.6 %
(2)Increase in long-term wholesale sales volume is primarily due to an increase in sales to certain long-term wholesale customers.

(3)This metric represents the amount earned per kWh for retail and wholesale revenue. This number is calculated as revenue divided by Electric Sales (kWh) for each respective revenue class. Management uses this metric to monitor retail and wholesale rates.
22







Operating Expenses
Fuel and Purchased Power Expense
TEP reported fuelFuel and purchased powerPurchased Power expense of $506$606 million in 20192021 compared with $543$515 million in 2018.2020. The decreaseincrease of $37$91 million, or 7%18%, was primarily due to:
$53 million in lower PPFAC recoveries primarily due to changes in the PPFAC rate and an increase in deferral of eligible costs.
The decrease was partially offset by:
$697 million in higher fuel expensecosts primarily due to realized losses on hedging contracts resulting from lowerto: (i) an increase in natural gas prices;prices, net of realized gains on natural gas swaps, as a result of a severe winter storm in the southwestern United States in February 2021; and (ii) a tolling PPA entered into in June 2021;
$557 million in higher purchased power primarily due to: (i) a tolling PPA entered into in June 2021; and (ii) an increase in price; partially offset by a decrease in volume; and
$13 million in higher transmission costs primarily due to an increase in transmission purchases and increased transmission rates; andrelated to Oso Grande.
$3The increase was partially offset by $76 million in higher purchased power primarily due to an increase in volume.of PPFAC eligible costs that were deferred as a regulatory asset for future recovery.
25


The following table provides key statistics impacting Fuel and Purchased Power:
Years Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
(kWh in millions)20212020Percent2019Percent
Sources of Energy
Coal-Fired Generation5,309 5,778 (8.1)%7,046 (18.0)%
Gas-Fired Generation7,285 7,582 (3.9)%7,714 (1.7)%
Utility-Owned Renewable Generation (1)
648 84 *75 12.0 %
Total Generation13,242 13,444 (1.5)%14,835 (9.4)%
Purchased Power, Non-Renewable1,662 1,360 22.2 %1,709 (20.4)%
Purchased Power, Renewable (2)
938 681 37.7 %643 5.9 %
Total Generation and Purchased Power (3)
15,842 15,485 2.3 %17,187 (9.9)%
(cents per kWh)
Average Fuel Cost of Generated Power (4)
Coal2.60 2.51 3.6 %2.46 2.0 %
Natural Gas (5)(6)
3.36 2.03 65.5 %2.33 (12.9)%
Average Cost of Purchased Power (7)
Purchased Power, Non-Renewable (6)
8.88 6.26 41.9 %4.09 53.1 %
Purchased Power, Renewable7.63 9.42 (19.0)%9.43 (0.1)%
* Not meaningful
(1)In May 2021, Oso Grande was placed in service, adding 250 MW of wind-powered electric generation, increasing TEP's total utility-owned renewable generation.
(2)In April 2021, a 100 MW solar facility achieved commercial operation, adding up to 100 MW of renewable purchased power capacity for TEP under the related PPA.
(3)This number represents the kWh generated from TEP's generating stations including coal-fired, gas-fired, and renewable generation, combined with the kWh of purchased power from both renewable and non-renewable sources. Management uses this number to monitor the performance of each energy source.
(4)This metric represents the fuel cost as cents per kWh for coal and purchase power:natural gas generated power. This number is calculated as fuel cost divided by Generation (kWh) for each respective generation source. Management uses this metric to monitor rates and pricing as well as analyze the performance of generation stations.
(5)Includes realized gains and losses from hedging activity.
 Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease) Year Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
(kWh in millions)2019 2018 Percent 2017 Percent
Sources of Energy         
Coal-Fired Generation7,046
 7,208
 (2.2)% 7,530
 (4.3)%
Gas-Fired Generation7,714
 6,738
 14.5 % 3,237
 108.2 %
Utility-Owned Renewable Generation75
 82
 (8.5)% 83
 (1.2)%
Total Generation14,835
 14,028
 5.8 % 10,850
 29.3 %
Purchased Power, Non-Renewable1,709
 1,624
 5.2 % 2,471
 (34.3)%
Purchased Power, Renewable643
 652
 (1.4)% 646
 0.9 %
Total Generation and Purchased Power17,187
 16,304
 5.4 % 13,967
 16.7 %
(cents per kWh)         
Average Fuel Cost of Generated Power         
Coal2.46
 2.44
 0.8 % 2.41
 1.2 %
Natural Gas (1)
2.33
 2.54
 (8.3)% 3.06
 (17.0)%
Average Cost of Purchased Power         
Purchased Power, Non-Renewable4.09
 4.32
 (5.3)% 3.78
 14.3 %
Purchased Power, Renewable9.43
 9.41
 0.2 % 9.49
 (0.8)%
(6)In February 2021, a severe winter storm in the southwestern United States drove increased energy demand, limited the availability of natural gas to fuel generation stations, and increased the cost of natural gas and purchased power. In June 2021, the market price for purchased power increased significantly due to high demand resulting from higher than normal temperatures.
(1)
(7)This metric represents the fuel cost as cents per kWh for renewable and non-renewable purchased power. This number is calculated as purchased power cost divided by Purchased Power (kWh) for each respective form of purchased power. Management uses this metric to compare and monitor the costs of renewable and non-renewable purchased power.
Includes realized gains and losses from hedging activity.
Operations and Maintenance Expense
TEP reported operationsOperations and maintenanceMaintenance expense of $378$397 million in 20192021 compared with $362$352 million in 2018.2020. The increase of $16$45 million, or 4%13%, in 2019 was primarily due to:
$2219 million in higher reimbursable maintenance expense related toat Springerville Units 3 and 4; and
$3 million in higher expenses related to an increase in employee wages and benefits and outside services.
The increase was partially offset by $8 million in lower expense related to planned generation outages in 2018 not recurring in 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $12 million, or 7%, in 2019 compared with 20184 primarily due to an increase in asset base.generation outages in 2021;

$15 million in higher maintenance expense primarily due to an increase in generation outages in 2021; partially offset by lower bad debt expense; and
$11 million in higher employee wages and benefits expense.
23
26



Depreciation and Amortization Expense
TEP reported Depreciation and Amortization total expense of $246 million in 2021 compared with $218 million in 2020. The increase of $28 million, or 13%, was primarily due to:
$15 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense due to an increase in asset base; and
$13 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense due to an increase in depreciation rates and amortization as approved in the 2020 Rate Order.
Other Income (Expense)
TEP reported otherOther Income (Expense) expense of $62$49 million in 20192021 and 2020. Changes in 2021 compared with $57 million in 2018. The increase of $5 million, or 9%, in 2019 compared with 2018 was2020 were primarily due to:
$116 million increase in higher Gila River Unit 2 demand charges, which are recovered through the PPFAC and accounted for as finance lease interest expense; and
$10 million in higher interest expense related to debt issued in November 2018.
The increase was partially offset by:
$10 million in higher AFUDCother income primarily due to an increase in construction projects;expected return on pension plan assets; and
$82 million increase in the value of company-owned life insuranceinvestments used to support certain post-employment benefits as a result of favorable market conditions.
Offset by:
$8 million in lower AFUDC due to a decrease in eligible construction expenditures as a result of Oso Grande being placed in service and a 2020 FERC order that provided for an adjustment in the AFUDC calculation not recurring in 2021.
Income Tax Expense
TEP reported income taxIncome Tax expense of $34$32 million in 20192021 compared with $43$41 million in 2018.2020. The decrease of $9 million, or 21%22%, in 2019 compared with 2018 was primarily due to:
$3 million in lower tax expense due to EDIT amortization true-upsPTCs earned related to the TCJA;Oso Grande being placed in service in May 2021.
$3 million in AMT credits recognized in the first quarter of 2019 related to a revision in tax law guidance; and
$3 million in lower tax expense due to a decrease in earnings.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Any extended period of economic disruption could affect our business and financial conditions, and access to sources of liquidity. Cash flows may vary during the year with cash flows from operations typically being typically the lowest in the first quarter of the year and highest in the third quarter due to TEP’sTEP's summer peaking load. We use our revolving credit agreements as needed to fund our business activities. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity under our credit agreementsthe 2021 Credit Agreement to meet short-term working capital needs and to provide credit enhancement as necessary under energy procurement and hedging agreements. The availability and terms under which we have access to external financing dependsdepend on a variety of factors, including our credit ratings and conditions in the bank and capital markets.
Available Liquidity
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10
Amount Available under Credit Agreements (1)
310
Total Liquidity$320
(in millions)December 31, 2021
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10 
Amount Available under Credit Agreement (1)
The 2015 Credit Agreement provides for $250 million of revolving credit commitments and a LOC sublimit of $50 million with a maturity date of October 2022. The 2019 Credit Agreement provides for a $225 million term loan with a maturity date of December 2020.225 
Total Liquidity$235 
(1)The 2015 Credit Agreement was amended and restated in October 2021, by the 2021 Credit Agreement. See Access to Credit Agreement below.
Future Liquidity Requirements
We expect to meet all of our financial obligations and other anticipated cash outflows for the foreseeable future. These obligations and anticipated cash outflows include, but are not limited to: (i) dividend payments; (ii) debt maturities; (iii) employee benefit obligations; and (iii)(iv) contracted obligations includedincluding those forecasted in theContractual Obligations and forecasted Capital Expenditures tablestable below.
See Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional information regarding TEP's market risks and Note 7of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding TEP's financing arrangements.

27
24


Summary of Cash Flows
The table below presents net cash provided by (used for) operating, investing and financing activities:
Years Ended 
Increase
(Decrease)
 Year Ended 
Increase
(Decrease)
Years EndedIncrease
(Decrease)
Year EndedIncrease
(Decrease)
(in millions)2019 2018 Percent 2017 Percent(in millions)20212020Percent2019Percent
Operating Activities$414
 $457
 (9.4)% $448
 2.0%Operating Activities$428 $466 (8.2)%$414 12.6 %
Investing Activities(654) (433) 51.0 % (392) 10.5%Investing Activities(549)(867)(36.7)%(654)32.6 %
Financing Activities115
 79
 45.6 % (50) 258.0%Financing Activities72 455 (84.2)%115 295.7 %
Net Increase (Decrease)(125) 103
 *
 6
 *
Net Increase (Decrease)(49)54 *(125)*
Beginning of Period153
 50
 206.0 % 43
 16.3%Beginning of Period82 28 192.9 %153 (81.7)%
End of Period (1)
$28
 $153
 (81.7)% $49
 212.2%
End of Period (1)
$33 $82 (59.8)%$28 192.9 %
* Not meaningful
(1)
(1)Calculated on rounded data and may not correspond exactly to amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Calculated on rounded data and may not correspond exactly to amounts on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $43$38 million in 20192021 compared with 20182020 primarily due to: (i) lower fuel and purchased power recoveries related to lower volumes and a decrease inlower average cost recovery of PPFAC costs as a result of changes in the PPFAC rate; (ii) a settlement payment for final mine reclamation settlement associated with the early retirement of Navajo; (iii) lower retail sales primarilyhigher operations and maintenance expenses due to a decreasean increase in usage related to unfavorable weather;employee wages and (iv) changesbenefits expense and planned generation outages in working capital related to the timing of billing collections and payments.
The decrease was partially offset by: (i) a decrease in cash paid for pension funding as a result of favorable market conditions; and (ii) a decrease2021; (iii) an increase in amounts returned to customers through bill credits related to the TCJA.TCJA; and (iv) AMT credit refunds occurring in 2020 as a result of provisions of the CARES Act not recurring in 2021.
The decrease was partially offset by: (i) higher retail revenues related to an increase in rates as approved in the 2020 Rate Order; (ii) higher gains from wholesale transactions; (iii) higher transmission revenue primarily due to a change in formula rates; and (iv) changes in working capital related to higher sales and the timing of billing collections.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used for investing activities increaseddecreased by $221$318 million in 20192021 compared with 20182020 primarily due to: (i) the purchasecapital expenditures in 2020 of Gila River Unit 2$285 million in December 2019; and (ii) payments for the Oso Grande project under the BTA and an $8 million payment for other investments not recurring in 2019.2021; and (ii) a decrease in cash used to purchase additional interests in generation facilities, net of proceeds received from the sale of an interest in a facility, not occurring in 2021.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows provided by financing activities increaseddecreased by $36$383 million in 20192021 compared with 20182020 primarily due to: (i) higherlower proceeds from debt issuances and credit facility borrowings, net of repayments; and (ii) a decrease in cash dividend payments toequity contributions from UNS Energy. The increase was partially offset by lower proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of long-term repayments.
Sources of Liquidity
Short-Term Investments
Our short-term investment policy governs the investment of excess cash balances. We periodically review and update this policy in response to market conditions. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had no short-term investments.
Access to Credit Agreements
We have access to working capital through our credit agreements.agreement with lenders. In October 2021, TEP entered into an unsecured credit agreement that provides for revolving credit commitments plus swingline and LOC facilities, due in October 2026 (2021 Credit Agreement). The 2021 Credit Agreement has a capacity of $250 million with swingline and LOC sub-limits of $15 million and $50 million, respectively. The 2021 Credit Agreement amended and restated in its entirety the prior credit facility entered into in October 2015, and extended through October 2022, that provided for revolving credit commitments and an LOC facility (2015 Credit Agreement).
Amounts borrowed from the 2019 Credit Agreement were used (i) to complete the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 Generating Station; (ii) to make payments for the construction of the Oso Grande project; and (iii) for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2019, there was $60 million available under the 2019 Credit Agreement. As of February 12, 2020, there were no amounts available under the 2019 Credit Agreement. Prepaid amounts under the 2019 Credit Agreement may not be reborrowed.
Amounts borrowed from the 20152021 Credit Agreement will be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes andpurposes. LOCs will be issued from time to time to support energy procurement, hedging transactions, and other business activities. As of
28


December 31, 2019,2021, there was $250$225 million available under the 20152021 Credit Agreement. In January 2020, TEP delivered $12 million in LOCs pursuant to TEP taking ownership of Oso Grande under the build-transfer agreement. As of February 12, 2020,10, 2022, there was $173$220 million available under the 20152021 Credit Agreement.

25







We are exposed to adverse changes in interest rates to the extent that we rely on variable rate financing.
See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our credit agreementsagreement.
Debt Financing
We use debt financing to meet a portion of our capital needs and lower our overall cost of capital. Our cost of capital is also affected by our credit ratings.
In 2016,December 2020, the ACC issued an order granting TEP financing authority (2016 Financing Authority).that took effect January 1, 2021. The order extends and expands the previous financingprovides authority by:through December 2025 for: (i) extending authority from December 2016 to December 2020; (ii) increasing the outstandinga maximum amount of long-term debt limitation from $1.7 billionoutstanding not to $2.2exceed $2.9 billion; (iii) allowing(ii) parent equity contributions of up to $400$700 million; and (iv) continuing the interest rate hedging authority. As of February 12, 2020, our long-term debt was $1,614 million.
TEP will be submitting an application for a new financing authority with the ACC(iii) credit facilities not to exceed $300 million in the first quarter of 2020.aggregate.
TEP has, from time to time, refinanced or repurchased portions of its outstanding debt before scheduled maturity. Depending on market conditions, we may refinance other debt issuances or make additional debt repurchases in the future.repurchase debt.
In November 2019,August 2021, TEP redeemed at par a series of fixed rate tax-exempt bonds with an$250 million aggregate principal amount of $15 million5.15% senior unsecured notes prior to the maturity of the bonds.notes.
In May 2021, TEP issued and sold $325 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior unsecured notes due May 2051, with the proceeds used to redeem debt and for general corporate purposes.
We anticipate issuing long-term debt in 2020 to: (i) refinance the borrowings under the 2019 Credit Agreement; (ii) redeem tax-exempt bonds; (iii) make payments for the constructionfirst quarter of the Oso Grande project; and (iv) for general corporate purposes.2022.
Credit Ratings
Credit ratings affect our access to capital markets and supplemental bank financing. As of December 31, 2019,2021, credit ratings from S&P Global Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service for our senior unsecured debt were A- and A3, respectively.
Our credit ratings are dependentdepend on a number of factors, both quantitative and qualitative, and are subject to change at any time. The disclosure of these credit ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold TEP securities. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other ratings.
Certain of TEP's debt agreements contain pricing based on our credit ratings. A change in TEP’s credit ratings can cause an increase or decrease in the amount of interest we pay on our borrowings, and the amount of fees we pay for LOCs and unused commitments.
Debt Covenants
Under certain agreements, should TEP fail to maintain compliance with covenants, lenders could accelerate the maturity of all amounts outstanding. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP was in compliance with these covenants.
We do not have any provisions in any of our debt or lease agreements that would cause an event of default or cause amounts to become due and payable in the event of a credit rating downgrade.
Contributions from Parent
UNS Energy made equity contributions to TEP of $50 million in 20192021 and 2018.$250 million in 2020. The proceeds provided additional liquidity to TEP. In January 2020, UNS Energy made an equity contribution to TEP of $125 million. The proceedsand were used in part for the construction of the Oso Grande project.
In 2020, we expect to receive additional equity contributions from UNS Energy. The proceeds are expected to be used for: (i) investments in generation, transmission, and distribution assets; and (ii) general corporate purposes.assets.
Dividends Declared and Paid to Parent
TEP declared and paid $75$63 million in dividends to UNS Energy in 20192021 and $85$75 million in 2018.

26







2020.
Master Trading Agreements
TEP conducts its wholesale marketing and risk management activities under certain master trading agreements. Under these agreements, TEP may be required to post credit enhancements in the form of cash or LOCs due to exposures exceeding unsecured credit limits provided toestablished for TEP based on changes inin: (i) contract values, changes in TEP’svalues; (ii) our credit ratings,ratings; or (iii) material changes in TEP’sour creditworthiness. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had no cash posted $2 million cash as acollateral to provide credit enhancement with onerelated to our wholesale marketing or risk management activities.
29


Capital Expenditures
TEP's routine capital expenditures include funds used for customer growth, system reinforcement, replacements and betterments, and costs to comply with environmental rules and regulations. TEP is prioritizing capital projects to mitigate supply chain risk and other potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and ensure that we continue providing safe and reliable service while supporting public health. In 2019,2021, total capital expenditures of $608$499 million included: (i) investments in distribution and transmission assets; and (ii) $10 million in payments for the Oso Grande project under the BTA. In 2020, total capital expenditures of $840 million included: (i) the purchase of Gila River Unit 2Springerville Common Facilities in December 2019;2020; (ii) $331 million in payments for the Oso Grande;Grande project under the BTA; and (iii) other investments in generation, transmission, and distribution assets. In 2018, total capital expenditures of $393 million included investments in generation assets and an enhanced metering and distribution network.
Our forecasted capital expenditures presented below for years ended December 31 exclude amounts for AFUDC equity and other non-cash items:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222023202420252026
Generation Facilities:
Renewable Energy (1)
$$96 $223 $$76 
Other Generation Facilities56 48 34 63 44 
Total Generation Facilities65 144 257 66 120 
Transmission and Distribution (2)
312 337 282 296 313 
General and Other (3)
81 62 56 76 57 
Total Capital Expenditures$458 $543 $595 $438 $490 
(in millions)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Generation Facilities:         
Renewable Energy (1)
$346
 $31
 $
 $
 $
Other Generation Facilities (2)
198
 64
 38
 63
 47
Total Generation Facilities544
 95
 38
 63
 47
Transmission and Distribution (3)
291
 356
 319
 270
 145
General and Other (4)
138
 122
 60
 53
 49
Total Capital Expenditures$973
 $573
 $417
 $386
 $241
(1)Includes investments in renewable energy, including battery storage, that we expect will allow us to continue our long-term strategy of shifting to a more diverse, sustainable energy portfolio.
(1)
(2)Increases due to investments in transmission capacity and distribution system reliability.
(3)Includes cost for information technology, fleet, facilities, and communication equipment.
Includes investments in renewable energy that will allow us to continue to move toward our long-term strategy of shifting to a more diverse, sustainable energy portfolio. In January 2020, TEP made a payment of $226 million for Oso Grande under the build-transfer agreement.
(2)
Includes the commitment to purchase Springerville Common Facilities.
(3)
Includes investments in transmission capacity and system reinforcements.
(4)
Includes cost for information technology, fleet, facilities, and communication equipment.
These estimates are subject to continuing review and adjustment. Actual capital expenditures may differ from these estimates due to fluctuations in business and market conditions, construction schedules, possible early plant closures, changes in generation resources, environmental requirements, state or federal regulations, new or changing commitments, and other factors. We expect to pay for forecasted capital expenditures with internally generated funds and external financings, which may include issuances of long-term debt, other borrowings, or equity contributions.

27







Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our material contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
   Payments Due by Period
(in millions)Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
Long-Term Debt
        
Principal (1)
$1,614
 $80
 $250
 $150
 $1,134
Interest (2)
943
 71
 122
 100
 650
Leases (3)(4)
86
 18
 68
 
 
Purchase Obligations:
        
Fuel, Including Transportation (5)
455
 94
 101
 66
 194
Purchased Power8
 8
 
 
 
Transmission63
 21
 30
 6
 6
Renewable Power Purchase Agreements (6)
857
 63
 126
 125
 543
RES Performance-Based Incentives (7)
69
 8
 14
 14
 33
Land Easements and Rights-of-Way (8)
87
 1
 3
 4
 79
Build-Transfer Agreement (9)
338
 338
 
 
 
Other Long-Term Liabilities: (10)(11)

        
RSU and PSU12
 5
 7
 
 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits (12)
74
 19
 12
 12
 31
Total Contractual Obligations$4,606
 $726
 $733
 $477
 $2,670
(1)
Total long-term debt is not reduced by $10 million of related unamortized debt issuance costs or $2 million of unamortized original issue discount.
(2)
Excludes interest on credit agreements.
(3)
TEP leases an interest in Springerville Common Facilities, land, rail cars, and communication tower space with remaining terms up to 22 years. In December 2019, TEP exercised its option to purchase the interests in the Springerville Common Facilities by January 2021, the expiration date of the leases, for $68 million. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding our leases.
(4)
Effective with commercial operation of Springerville Unit 3 in July 2006 and Unit 4 in December 2009, Tri-State and SRP reimburse TEP for various operating costs related to the Springerville Common Facilities, on an ongoing basis. TEP was reimbursed $6 million of operating costs in 2019 by SRP and Tri-State related to the Springerville Common Facilities and does not expect any material changes to the reimbursement amount in 2020. The obligation balance does not reflect any reduction associated with the reimbursement.
(5)
Excludes TEP’s liability for final mine reclamation costs related to coal mines that supply generation facilities, in which TEP has an ownership interest but does not operate, as the timing of payments has not been determined. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding TEP’s share of reclamation costs.
(6)
TEP enters into long-term renewable PPAs which require TEP to purchase 100% of certain renewable energy generation facilities' output once commercial operation status is achieved. While TEP is not required to make payments under these contracts if power is not delivered, the table above includes estimated future payments based on expected power deliveries. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PPAs.
(7)
TEP has entered into REC agreements to purchase the environmental attributes from retail customers with solar installations. Payments for the RECs are termed PBI and are paid in contractually agreed upon intervals (usually quarterly) based on metered renewable energy production. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PBIs.
(8)
Have varying terms and provisions and reflect expiration dates through 2054. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Land Easements and Rights-of-Way.
(9)
TEP entered into an agreement to develop a wind-powered electric generation facility with costs of $384 million. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Build-Transfer Agreement.

28







(10)
Excludes AROs of $107 million expected to occur through 2048.
(11)
Excludes unrecognized tax benefits of $18 million. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years in connection with these tax liabilities.
(12)
Represents TEP’s expected contributions to pension plans in 2020, expected benefit payments for its unfunded SERP, and expected other postretirement benefit costs to cover medical and life insurance claims as determined by the plans’ actuaries. Due to the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates might have on payment obligation amounts, other contributions beyond 2020 are excluded.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than the unrecorded contractual obligations in the table above, we do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into the financial statements.
Income Tax Position
Under the terms of the tax sharing agreement with UNS Energy, TEP did not make any U.S. federal or Arizona state income tax payments during 2019 due to existingmade net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in those jurisdictions. Based on its remaining tax carryforward balances, the Company does not anticipate making U.S. federal or state income tax payments of a material nature for the next several years.
Under the TCJA, AMT credit carryforwards will either be refunded or TEP will use them to offset U.S. federal income tax liabilities through the Company's$7 million in 2021, tax year. TEPand received an AMT credit refundnet refunds of $10 million in 2020 and $14 million in 2019 related to federal income tax returns. Based on our remaining tax credit carryforward balances and will receivelimitations on their use in individual years, we expect to make tax sharing payments in 2022. Future payment obligations are subject to change and are not expected to have a significant impact on our operating cash flows.
Payroll Tax
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. As permitted by the CARES Act, TEP deferred payment of the employer's portion of social security taxes. In 2020, TEP recorded total deferred deposits of $7 million in 2020,Accrued Taxes Other than Income Taxes and Regulatory and Other Liabilities—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. TEP paid $3 million each in December 2021 and 2022. Alternatively, TEP will utilize those amountsexpects to offset U.S. federal tax liabilities that would otherwise result throughpay the Company's 2021 tax year.remaining deferred deposits to the IRS in 2022.
In 2018, the ACC Refund Order was approved effective May 1, 2018. The refund amount, after the EDIT amortization true-up, totaled $33 million, which was passed back to customers through a bill credit in 2018. Customer bill credits are trued-up annually to reflect actual kWh sales and EDIT amortization. We filed an application with the ACC to establish the 2019 customer refund of $33 million, of which 75% was passed back to customers through a bill credit in 2019. TEP filed an application with the ACC to establish a 2020 customer refund of $35 million. We will continue to return savings to customers through a combination of a bill credit and a regulatory liability. The customer bill credit will account for 50% of the returned savings in 2020 and through the completion of our next rate case. The portion of savings not returned through a bill credit will be deferred as a regulatory liability and returned to customers through our next rate case, which was filed in April 2019.
See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the TCJA.
Environmental Matters
The EPA regulates or has the authority to regulate the amount of SO2, NOx, CO2, particulate matter, mercury and other by-products produced by generation facilities. We may incur additional costs to comply with future changes in federal and state environmental laws, regulations, and permit requirements at our generation facilities. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to a range of interpretations, which may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Because these laws and regulations continue to evolve, we are unable to predict the impact they may have on our operations and consolidated financial results. Complying with these changes may reduce operating efficiency and increase capital and operating costs. TEP will request recovery of the costs of environmental compliance through cost recovery mechanisms and Retail Rates. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the Broadway-Pantano site.
30


We capitalized $3 million in 2021 and $4 million in 2019 and $9 million in 20182020 in costs incurred to comply with environmental rules and regulations. In addition, we recorded environmental compliance related operations and maintenance expenses related to environmental compliance of $5 million in 2019, $6 million in 2018,2021, 2020, and $5 million in 2017.2019. We expect environmental compliance related capital expenditures of $3 million in 2020, $1 million in years 2021 through2022 and 2023, and $2 million in 2024.2024, and $1 million in 2025 and 2026. TEP will request recovery from its customers of the costs of environmental compliance through cost recovery mechanisms and Retail Rates.
Regional Haze Regulations
The EPA's Regional Haze rule requires emission reductions from certain industrial facilities emitting air pollutants that reduce visibility in national parks and wilderness areas. The rule calls for states to establish goals and emission reduction strategies for improving visibility in these areas. States must submit these goals and strategies to the EPA for approval in the form of a State Implementation Plan (SIP), and must review and submit revisions to the SIP on a periodic basis.
In December 2016, the EPA signed a final rule that, among other things, changed the submittal date for the next Regional Haze SIP revisions from 2018 to 2021. The ADEQ began to develop a control strategy with a focus on making reasonable progress

29







toward the national visibility goal. In July 2019, the ADEQ notified TEP that Sundt Unit 3 and Springerville Units 1 and Sundt2 had been selected for potential emissions controls evaluation.
TEP will work withconducted the potential emissions controls evaluation, commonly referred to as the four factor analysis, for both facilities. These evaluations were submitted to the ADEQ in March 2020 for the agency's use in developing the revised SIP. The regulatory deadline for ADEQ to prepare and submit the evaluations.revised SIP to the EPA for approval was July 31, 2021, however, ADEQ was not able to meet this deadline, and is continuing to develop the SIP for submittal. Based on current Regional Haze requirement time-frames, TEP anticipates that impacts,compliance strategies, if any, to the facilities will likely occurbe required to be implemented three to five years after the 2021ADEQ submits the revised SIP submittal date.to the EPA. TEP cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters at this time.time, but will continue to work with ADEQ to determine compliance strategies as needed.
Greenhouse Gas Regulation
In August 2015, the EPA issued the Clean Power Plan (CPP) limiting CO2 emissions from existing and new fossil fuel-based generation facilities. The CPP establishesestablished state-level CO2 emission rates and mass-based goals that applyapplied to fossil fuel-based generation. The plan targetstargeted CO2 emissions reductions for existing facilities by 2030 and establishesestablished interim goals that begin in 2022.
In June 2019, the EPA repealed the CPP and replaced it withissued the ACEAffordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, establishing new emissions guidelines. The new rule rebalances the roles between the states and the EPA. Under the new rule, the EPA would set emission guidelines for existing coal-fired generation facilities based on the Best System of Emission Reduction (BSER) for GHGGreenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The BSER for GHG emissions from existing coal-fired generation facilities is defined as heat-rate (efficiency) improvementsHeat-Rate Improvements (HRI) that can be applied at the source. TheUnder the rule, the states would then use these emission guidelines to establish state performance standards, considering source specific factors such as the remaining useful life of an individual unit.
Effective September 2019, states will have three years to submit plansOn March 5, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a mandate vacating and remanding the ACE rule to the EPA establishing performance standards.EPA. The EPA has 12 monthsmandate also vacated amendments that extended the timeline under which companies had to act on a complete state submittal. If a state plan is not approved, or a state fails to submit a plan withincome into compliance with the allotted three years,rule. On October 29, 2021, the EPA would have two years to issue a federal plan.
Legal challenges to the rule could delay the effectiveness and implementationUnited States Supreme Court granted four petitions seeking review of the newD.C. Circuit's decision to vacate and remand the ACE rule.
TEP does not anticipate a material impact to its generation facilitiescannot predict the outcome of these matters at this time, as a result of the rule. TEPbut will continue to work with other Arizona utilities, as well as the appropriate regulatory agencies, to develop compliance strategies as needed.monitor legal challenges, legislative efforts, and administrative rulemakings.
Coal Combustion Residuals Regulation
In April 2015, the EPA issued a final rule requiring the disposal of coal ash and other CCR to be managed as a solid waste under Subtitle D of the RCRA for disposal in landfills and/or surface impoundments. Our share of costs to comply with the CCR rule at Four Corners is estimated to be $3 million,million. This includes estimated costs for corrective action for two CCR units at the majorityfacility. APS, the operating agent of which is expectedFour Corners, began an assessment of corrective measures in 2019, and expects the assessment to be capital expenditures associated with site preparation and installation ofcontinue into 2022.
Since these regulations were finalized, the groundwater monitoring well system. TEP and the co-owners of Navajo retired the generation station in November 2019.EPA has taken steps to modify this rules. The following are pending rulemakings:
In December 2016, Congress approved the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, which authorizesgave the StatesEPA authority to either authorize states to establish their own permit programsprogram under RCRA for implementing regulation of CCR or issue federal permits in states without a program and on tribal lands. In accordance with this Act,
31


the EPA proposed to establish a federal CCR permit program on February 20, 2020. Public comment on the EPA's proposal closed in August 2020.
On March 15, 2018, the EPA proposed to add boron to the list of constituents that trigger corrective action requirements to remediate groundwater impacted by CCR disposal activities. In a separate proposal dated August 14, 2019, the EPA acknowledged that if it finalizes the addition of boron it will need to establish an alternative risk-based groundwater protection standard for CCR.boron, as boron does not have a Maximum Contaminant Level. TEP cannot predict the outcome or timing on when the EPA will take final action on this matter.
As of December 31, 2021, the EPA has not taken final action on these proposals. As a result, TEP cannot predict the impact of the proposed rulemakings.
Effluent Limitation Guidelines
In 2015, as part of the Clean Water Act, the EPA published the final Steam Electric Power Generating category Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standard rule, revising standards and limitations for coal-fired generation wastewater discharges. The rule established new or additional Effluent Limitations Guidelines (ELG) for wastewater discharges associated with fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization, flue gas mercury control, and gasification of fuels such as coal and petroleum coke. In response to the WIIN Act and RCRA rulemaking petitions,legal challenges, the EPA has indicated that it intends to conduct two phases of CCR rule revisions. In July 2018,revised the EPA signedELGs and issued a Phase 1, Part 1 final rule which: (i)on August 31, 2020, which became effective December 14, 2020. The final rule revised groundwater protection standardsrequirements for rule-specific constituents without maximum containment levels; (ii) incorporated risk-based changes under an EPA-approved stateflue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water.
With the exception of Four Corners, none of TEP's coal-fired generation facilities are subject to the final rule. The revised ELGs warrant a modification of Four Corners' wastewater discharge permit, program or an EPANational Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit, program; and (iii) extended certain closure deadlines. In response to challenges to this rule,which was last issued in September 2019. APS, the EPAoperator of Four Corners, filed a motion to voluntarily remand the rule but not vacate it. On March 13, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Court issued an order granting the EPA's motion, allowing thepermit modification request on January 11, 2021, which is still pending EPA nine months to undertake new rulemaking. In August 2019, the EPA issued the Phase 2 rule revision proposal.final action. TEP does not anticipate a material impact on operations or financial results from the anticipated proposed rule revisions.results.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to apply accounting policies and to make estimates and assumptions that affect results of operations and the amounts of assets and liabilities reported in the financial statements and related notes. Management believes that the areas described below require significant judgment in the application of accounting policy or in making estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. Additional information on TEP’s other significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8of this Form 10-K.
Accounting for Regulated Operations
We account for our regulated electric operations in accordance with accounting standards that allow the actions of our regulators, the ACC and the FERC, to be reflected in our financial statements. Regulator actions may cause us to capitalize certain costs that would be included as an expense, or in AOCI, in the current period by unregulated companies. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred because they are probable of future recovery in Retail Rates or in rates charged to wholesale customers through transmission tariffs. Regulatory liabilities generally represent expected future costs that have already been collected from customers or amounts that are expected to be returned to customers through billing reductions in future periods. We evaluate regulatory assets and liabilities each period and believe future recovery or settlement is probable. Our assessment includes consideration of recent rate orders, historical regulatory treatment of similar costs, and changes in the regulatory and political environment. If management's assessment is ultimately different than actual regulatory outcomes, the impact on our results of operations, financial position, and future cash flows could be material.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, regulatory liabilities net of regulatory assets in the balance sheet totaled $108$79 million. There are no current or expected changes in the regulatory environment that impact our ability to apply accounting guidance for regulated operations. If we conclude in a future period that our operations no longer meet the criteria in this guidance, we would reflect our pension and other postretirement plan regulatory assets or liabilities in AOCI and recognize the impact of other regulatory assets and liabilities inon the income statement. The impact of this change would be material to our financial statements. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding regulatory matters.
Revenue Recognition
TEP’s retail revenues, which are recognized in the period that electricity is delivered and consumed by customers, include unbilled revenue based on an estimate of kWh delivered at the end of each period. Unbilled revenues are dependent upon a number of factors that require management’s judgment, including estimates of retail sales and customer usage patterns. The unbilled revenue is estimated by comparing the estimated kWh delivered to the kWh billed to our retail customers. The excess of estimated kWh delivered over kWh billed is allocated to the retail customer classes based on estimated usage by each customer class. We then record revenueRevenue is recorded for each customer class based on the Retail Rates for each customer class. Due to the seasonal
32


fluctuations of TEP’s actual load, unbilled revenues increase during the spring and summer and decrease during the fall and winter. A provision for uncollectible accounts associated with retail revenues is recorded as a component of operations and maintenance expense.
Income Taxes
Due to the differences between GAAP and income tax laws, many transactions are treated differently for income tax purposes than they are in the financial statements. We account for this difference by recording deferred income tax assets and liabilities using the effective income tax rate as of our balance sheet date. TEP records income tax liabilities based on TEP's taxable income as reported in the consolidated tax return of FortisUS.
A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred asset will not be realized. In making this judgment, management evaluates all available evidence and gives more weight to objective verifiable evidence. TEP recorded no valuation allowance as of December 31, 2019.2021. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding income taxes.
Plant Asset Depreciable Lives
TEP has significant investments in electric generation, assets and electric transmission, and distribution assets. We calculate depreciation expense based on our estimate of the useful lives of our plant assets and expectedestimated net removal costs. The ACC approves depreciation rates for all generation, distribution, and general plant assets. Depreciation rates for these assets cannot be changed without the ACC's approval. TEP's transmission assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC. The useful lives of plant assets are further detailed in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Changes to depreciation estimates resulting from a change of estimated service life or removal costs could have a significant impact on the amount of depreciation expense recorded in the income statement. The ACC approves depreciation

30







rates for all generation and distribution assets. Depreciation rates for such assets cannot be changed without the ACC's approval. TEP's transmission assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-Kfor additional information regarding depreciation rates.
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
GAAP requires us to record the fair value of a liability for a legal obligation to retire a long-lived tangible asset in the period in which the liability is incurred. This includes obligations resulting from conditional future events. We incur legal obligations as a result of environmental regulations imposed by state and federal regulators, contractual agreements, and other factors. To estimate the liability, management must use judgment and assumptions in determining or estimating: (i) whether a legal obligation exists to remove assets; (ii) the probability of a future event for a conditional obligation; (iii) the fair value of the cost of removal; (iv) when final removal will occur; and (v) the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates to be used to discount the future liabilities. Changes that may arise over time with regard to our judgment and assumptions will change amounts recorded in the future as expense for AROs. WhenUpon initial recognition of a new obligation is recorded, the cost of thelegal liability, iscosts are capitalized by increasing the carrying amountas part of the related long-lived asset and subsequently amortized over the useful life of the underlyingrelated asset. Accretion of the liability and amortization of the associated asset are deferredrecorded as regulatory assets because these costs are expecteda regulated asset to be recovered through depreciation rates.
TEP identified legal obligations to retire generation facilities specified in land leases for its jointly-owned NavajoFour Corners and Four CornersNavajo facilities. These stations reside on land leased from the Navajo Nation. The provisions of the leasesFour Corners' lease require the lessees to remove the facilities at Four Corners upon request of the Navajo Nation at expiration of the leases.lease. TEP is currently removing facilities at Navajo at the request of the Navajo Nation. TEP also has certain environmental obligations at Gila River, Luna, San Juan, Sundt and Springerville. TEP estimates that its share of the AROs to remove the Navajo and Four Corners facilities and settle the Luna, San Juan, Sundt, Gila River, and Springerville environmental and contractual obligations will be approximately $220$238 million at the retirement dates. Additionally, TEP entered into land lease agreements or land easement agreements with certain landowners for the installation of PV and wind assets. The provisions of the PV and wind land leases or land easements require TEP to remove the PV or wind facilities upon expiration of the agreements. In addition, TEP is required to properly dispose of or recycle the PV assets under RCRA. We estimated our ARO related to the PV and wind assets to be approximately $19$52 million at the retirement dates. We have identified no other legal obligations to retire generation plant assets.
TEP has various transmission and distribution lines that operate under land easements and rights-of-way that contain end dates and may contain site restoration clauses. TEP operates transmission and distribution lines as if they will be operated in perpetuity and will continue to be used or sold without land remediation. As such, there are no AROs for these assets.
The total net present value of our ARO liability recorded in Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $107$139 million as of December 31, 2019.2021. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-Kfor additional information regarding AROs.
33


Additionally, ACC approved depreciation rates for TEP include a component designed to accrue the future costs of retiring assets for which no legal obligations exist. The accumulated balances are recorded as a regulatory liability and represent non-legal estimated cost of removal accruals, less actual removal costs incurred, net of salvage proceeds realized. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding future net cost of removal.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assumptions
TEP records the underfunded amount for its pension and other postretirement obligations as a liability. AmountsFor plans other than the SERP, amounts not yet recognized in the income statement are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability to reflect expected recovery or refund of pension and other postretirement obligations through rates charged to retail customers. As the funded status, discount rates, and actuarial facts change, the liability may vary significantly in future years. Key assumptions used include:
discount rates used to determine obligations;
expected returns on plan assets;
compensation increases;
mortality assumptions; and
healthcare cost trend rates.

31







Discount Rates
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP discounted its future pension plan obligations at 3.6%a rate of 3.2% and its other postretirement plan obligations at a rate of 3.3%3.0%. The discount rate for future pension plan and other postretirement plan obligations is determined annually based on the rates currently available on high-quality, non-callable, long-term bonds. The discount rate is based on a corporate yield curve using an average yield between the 60th and 90th percentile of AA-graded U.S. corporate bonds with future cash flows that match the timing and amount of expected future benefit payments.
Expected Returns on Plan Assets
To establish the expected return on assets assumption, TEP reviews the asset allocation and develops return assumptions for each asset class based on advice from an investment consultant and the pension’s actuary that includes both historical performance analysis and forward-looking views of the financial markets. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP assumed that its pension plans’ assets would generate a long-term rate of return of 6.75%7.0%.
Compensation Increases
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP used a rate of compensation increase of 2.8% to measure pension obligations.
Mortality
TheThe PRI-2012 mortality table projected with a modified version of improvement scale MP-2019MP-2020 with 15-year convergence and a 0.75% long-term rate was utilized to measure thepension obligations as of December 31, 2019 pension obligations, whereas RP-2014 mortality table projected with improvement scale MP-2018 was utilized for the2021 and December 31, 2018 measurement.2020.
Healthcare Cost Trend Rates
TEP used a current year healthcare cost trend rate range between 6.3%5.5% and 7.5%6.5% in valuing its other postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2019.2021. This rate reflects both market conditions and historical experience.
34


Sensitivity Analysis
The table below shows the effect on TEP's expense and obligation of a 100 basis point change to its assumptions as of December 31, 2019:
2021:
Effect on Expense Effect on ObligationEffect on ExpenseEffect on Obligation
(in millions)Increase Decrease Increase Decrease(in millions)IncreaseDecreaseIncreaseDecrease
Change to Pension       Change to Pension
Discount Rate$(6) $7
 $(71) $89
Discount Rate$(8)$10 $(85)$109 
Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets(4) 4
 N/A
 N/A
Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets(5)N/AN/A
Change to Other Postretirement Benefits       Change to Other Postretirement Benefits
Discount Rate
 
 (8) 10
Discount Rate(1)(9)11 
Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets
 
 N/A
 N/A
Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets— — N/AN/A
Healthcare Cost Trend Rate1
 (1) 7 (6)Healthcare Cost Trend Rate(2)9(8)
In 2020,2022, TEP will incur pension costs of $11$7 million and other postretirement benefit costs of $4$5 million. TEP expects to record: (i) $16$20 million to operations and maintenance expense; (ii) $4$6 million to capital; and (iii) $5$14 million to other income. In 2020,2022, TEP expects to make: (i)make pension plan contributions of $11 million; (ii)million and other retiree benefit payments to retirees under the retiree benefit plan of $5 million; and (iii) contributions to the VEBA trust of $1 million, net of distributions.million.
See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details regarding TEP's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan expenses and obligations.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Commodity Derivative Contracts
TEP enters into forward contracts to purchase or sell capacity or energy at contract prices over a given period of time, typically for one month, three months, one year, or three years, within established limits to meet forecasted load requirements or to take advantage of favorable market opportunities. In general, TEP enters into forward purchase contracts when market conditions provide the opportunity to purchase energy for its load at prices that are below the marginal cost of its supply resources or to

32







supplement its own resources (e.g., during plant outages and summer peaking periods). TEP enters into forward sales contracts when it forecasts that it will have excess supply, and the market price of energy exceeds its marginal cost. TEP enters into forward gas commodity price swap agreements to lock in fixed prices on a portion of forecasted natural gas purchases and to hedge the price risk associated with forward PPAs that are indexed to natural gas prices.
For all commodity derivative instruments that do not meet the normal purchase or normal sale scope exception, we recognize derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts entered into for retail customer load are recorded as either a regulatory asset or liability in the balance sheet based on our ability to recover the costs of hedging activities entered into to mitigate energy price risk for retail customers. There are no current or expected proposals or changes in the regulatory environment that impact the probability of future recovery of these assets through the PPFAC mechanism.
The market prices used to determine fair values for TEP’s derivative instruments as of December 31, 2019,2021, are estimated based on various factors including broker quotes, exchange prices, over the counter prices, and time value.
TEP manages the risk of counterparty default by performing financial credit reviews, setting limits, monitoring exposures, requiring collateral when needed, and using a standardized agreement, which allows for the netting of current period exposures to and from a single counterparty.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED AND NOT YET ADOPTED
For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting TEP, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
TEP’s financial statements are exposed to certain market risks that can affect asset and liability fair value, results of operations, and cash flows. TEP's significant market risks are primarily associated with interest rates, commodity and coal prices, and extension of
35


credit to counterparties. TEP may enter into interest rate swaps and financing transactions to manage changes in interest rates. TEP has a RMC responsible for the oversight of commodity price risk and credit risk related to wholesale energy marketing and power procurement activities. To limit TEP’s exposure to commodity price risk, the RMC sets trading and hedging policies and limits, which are reviewed frequently to respond to constantly changing market conditions. To limit TEP’s exposure to credit risk, the RMC reviews counterparty credit exposure as well as credit policies and limits on a regular basis.
Interest Rate Risk
Credit AgreementsAgreement
TEP is subject to interest rate risk resulting from changes in interest rates on borrowings under its credit agreements.the 2021 Credit Agreement. The interest rate paid on borrowings is variable. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreementsagreement are made on either the basis of a spread over LIBOR or an ABR. As a result, TEP may experience significant volatility in the rates paid on LIBOR borrowings under its credit agreements. The 2021 Credit Agreement provides for transitions to alternative benchmark rates.
The 20192021 Credit Agreement is a 364-day credit agreement that provides for up to $225for: (i) $250 million in term loans, which could be drawnrevolving credit commitments; (ii) a $15 million swingline sublimit; and (iii) a $50 million LOC sublimit. The agreement matures in up to two drawings.October 2026. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had borrowed $165 million under the 2019 Credit Agreement. As of February 12, 2020, TEP had borrowed $225 million under the 2019 Credit Agreement.
The 2015 Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature in October 2022 and provides for up to $250$15 million in credit borrowings. As of December 31, 2019, TEP had no revolving creditoutstanding borrowings under the 2015 Credit Agreement. In January 2020, TEP delivered $12revolving credit facility and a $10 million in LOCs pursuant to TEP taking ownership of Oso Grande under the build-transfer agreement. As of February 12, 2020, there was $173 million available under the 2015 Credit Agreement.LOC posted.
Commodity and Coal Price Risk
TEP is exposed to market fluctuations in electricity, natural gas, and coal prices as a result of its obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory and long-term wholesale contracts. TEP's load and generation facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposure to commodity prices consist primarily of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity that is purchased and sold in retail and wholesale markets. Commodity and coal prices may be subject to significant price changes as supply and demand are impacted by, among other unpredictable factors, weather, market liquidity, generation facility availability, customer usage, energy storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. Under the guidance of the Risk Management Committee (RMC), TEP mitigatesour RMC, we mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk through the use of commodity contracts, which includeusing forwards, financial swaps, and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply, fix fluctuating commodity prices, or sell future production generally at fixed prices. TEP'sWe also mitigate exposure to commodity and coal price risk is limited by itswith our ability to includerecover these costs in regulated rates through itsour PPFAC mechanism, which is subject to an annual review annually by the ACC. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information related to the PPFAC mechanism.
Certain commodity contracts qualify as derivatives and are recorded at fair value. The changes in fair value of such contracts have a high correlation to price changes in the hedged commodities. The following table shows the changes in fair value of our derivative positions:
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) Recorded to Regulatory (Assets) Liabilities$(45) $(9) $(18)

33







(in millions)202120202019
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) Recorded to Regulatory (Assets) Liabilities$62 $21 $(45)
TEP's derivative contracts mature on various dates through 2029. The table below displays the valuation methodologies and maturities of derivative contracts by source of fair value:
Unrealized Gain (Loss) of TEP’s Hedging ActivitiesUnrealized Gain (Loss) of TEP’s Hedging Activities
Maturity 0 – 6 months Maturity 6 – 12 months Maturity over 1 yr. Total Unrealized Gain (Loss)Maturity 0 – 6 monthsMaturity 6 – 12 monthsMaturity over 1 yr.Total Unrealized Gain (Loss)
(in millions)December 31, 2019(in millions)December 31, 2021
Prices Actively Quoted$(11) $(13) $(46) $(70)Prices Actively Quoted$(1)$$11 $14 
Sensitivity Analysis of Derivatives
TEP uses sensitivity analysis to measure the potential impact of favorable and unfavorable changes in market prices on the fair value of its derivative contracts. TEP recordsWe primarily record unrealized gains and losses as either a regulatory asset or liability. As contracts settle, the unrealized gains and losses are reversed and realized gains or losses are recorded to the PPFAC. For TEP's derivatives related to the purchase and sale of power, a 10% change in the market price of purchased power would affect unrealized positions reported as a regulatory asset or liability by approximately $7 million. For derivatives related to natural gas price hedges, a 10% change in the market price of energy would affect unrealized positions reported as a regulatory asset or liability by approximately $25$35 million.
36


Table of Contents
Coal Supply Agreements
TEP isWe are subject to fuel price risk from changes in the price of coal used to fuel itsour coal-fired generation facilities. ThisWe mitigate risk is mitigated through the use ofby using long-term coal supply agreements with limited price movement. TEP'sOur coal supply agreements expire from 20202022 through 2031. TEP is currently negotiating its coal supply agreement scheduled to expire in 2020. TEP expectsWhile we do expect coal reserves from the supplying mines to be sufficient to fulfill the estimated requirements for each coal-fired generation facility's estimated remaining life.life, we are seeking alternative coal sources to ensure we have sufficient supply in the event of early closure of our current supplying mines. See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.
Credit Risk
TEP isWe are exposed to credit risk in itsour energy-related marketing activities related to potential non-performance by counterparties. TEP managesWe manage the risk of counterparty default by performing financial credit reviews, setting limits, monitoring exposures, requiring collateral when needed, and using standard agreements which allow for the netting of current period exposures to and from a single counterparty. Counterparty credit exposure is calculated by adding any outstanding receivable, net of amounts payable if a netting agreement exists, to the mark-to-marketmarket value of any forward contracts. If exposure exceeds credit limits or contractual collateral thresholds, TEPwe may request that a counterparty provide credit enhancement in the form of cash collateral or an LOC. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we increased our monitoring of the effects of the economic slowdown on counterparties’ abilities to perform under their contractual obligations.
TEP hasWe have entered into short-term and long-term transactions related to itsour wholesale marketing and gas hedging activities with various counterparties. As of December 31, 2019, TEP’s2021, our total credit exposure was approximately $10 million. TEP$40 million, and we had approximately $4$2 million of exposure to non-investment grade counterparties.
As of December 31, 2019, TEP2021, we had $2 million ofno cash posted as collateral to provide credit enhancement to a counterparty. As of February 12, 2020, there was no collateral posted.enhancement. As of December 31, 2019, TEP2021, we held approximately $4$2 million in collateral from itsour wholesale counterparties.

37
34








ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholder and the Board of Directors of
Tucson Electric Power Company
Tucson, Arizona

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tucson Electric Power Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholder’sstockholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relate.
Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Arizona Corporation Commission (the “ACC”) and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). The ACC has jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric distribution companies in Arizona. The FERC regulates rates and services for electric transmission and wholesale power sales in interstate commerce. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
38


America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Regulatory decisions can have an impact on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. Accounting for the economics of rate regulation impacts multiple financial statement line items and disclosures, such as property, plant, and equipment; regulatory assets and liabilities; operating revenues; fuel expense; purchased power expense; operation and maintenance expense; and depreciation expense.
We identified the impact of rate regulation as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about impacted account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of future regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, (3) potential refunds to customers and (4) probability of potential charges related to the abandonment of regulated plants. While the Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that the regulatory authorities will not approve full recovery of the costs incurred. Auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due its inherent complexities.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the regulatory authorities included the following, among others:
•     We evaluated the effectiveness of management’s controls over the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates or of a future reduction in rates.
•     We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
•     We read relevant regulatory rate orders and settlements issued by the regulatory authorities for the Company and other public utilities in Arizona, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by intervenors, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the regulatory authorities’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared to management’s recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
•     For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s filings with the regulatory authorities and the filings with the regulatory authorities by intervenors that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
•     We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned or retired early. We inspected the capital-projects budget and construction-in-process listings and inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the regulatory authorities to identify any evidence that may contradict management’s assertion regarding recoverability of such costs.
•     We inspected regulatory filings for any evidence that intervenors are challenging full recovery of the cost of any capital projects. For significant projects that were over budget or if full recovery of project costs is being challenged by intervenors, we evaluated management’s assessment of the probability of a disallowance of such costs.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 12, 202010, 2022
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.


35
39








TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2019 2018 2017202120202019
Operating Revenues$1,418,338
 $1,432,618
 $1,340,935
Operating Revenues$1,592,586 $1,424,741 $1,418,338 
     
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses
Fuel358,394
 351,749
 285,551
Fuel399,914 302,637 358,394 
Purchased Power137,977
 134,914
 136,425
Purchased Power204,264 146,968 137,977 
Transmission and Other PPFAC Recoverable Costs52,261
 46,595
 36,239
Transmission and Other PPFAC Recoverable Costs65,583 52,860 52,261 
Increase (Decrease) to Reflect PPFAC Recovery Treatment(42,836) 9,885
 (32,660)Increase (Decrease) to Reflect PPFAC Recovery Treatment(64,155)12,565 (42,836)
Total Fuel and Purchased Power505,796
 543,143
 425,555
Total Fuel and Purchased Power605,606 515,030 505,796 
Operations and Maintenance377,563
 361,963
 360,302
Operations and Maintenance397,095 351,584 377,563 
Depreciation169,042
 158,310
 152,874
Depreciation201,524 189,051 169,042 
Amortization27,706
 26,052
 22,255
Amortization43,995 28,754 27,706 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes55,642
 55,006
 53,623
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes62,010 58,222 55,642 
Total Operating Expenses1,135,749
 1,144,474
 1,014,609
Total Operating Expenses1,310,230 1,142,641 1,135,749 
     
Operating Income282,589
 288,144
 326,326
Operating Income282,356 282,100 282,589 
     
Other Income (Expense)     Other Income (Expense)
Interest Expense(88,511) (67,620) (65,290)Interest Expense(86,865)(88,214)(88,511)
Allowance For Borrowed Funds5,744
 3,151
 2,078
Allowance For Borrowed Funds6,624 9,480 5,744 
Allowance For Equity Funds15,222
 8,117
 5,322
Allowance For Equity Funds17,885 22,847 15,222 
Unrealized Gains on InvestmentsUnrealized Gains on Investments3,898 1,741 6,015 
Other, Net5,524
 (487) 8,995
Other, Net9,823 4,903 (491)
Total Other Income (Expense)(62,021) (56,839) (48,895)Total Other Income (Expense)(48,635)(49,243)(62,021)
     
Income Before Income Tax Expense220,568
 231,305
 277,431
Income Before Income Tax Expense233,721 232,857 220,568 
Income Tax Expense34,053
 42,982
 100,763
Income Tax Expense32,476 41,452 34,053 
Net Income$186,515
 $188,323
 $176,668
Net Income$201,245 $191,405 $186,515 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

40

36








TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMECASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Comprehensive Income     
Net Income$186,515
 $188,323
 $176,668
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)     
Net Changes in Fair Value of Cash Flow Hedges:     
Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit of $(44), $(121), and $(305)133
 364
 485
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Adjustments:     
Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit of $1,059, $(747), and $637(3,190) 2,026
 (2,156)
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax(3,057) 2,390
 (1,671)
Total Comprehensive Income$183,458
 $190,713
 $174,997
Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income$201,245 $191,405 $186,515 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Depreciation Expense201,524 189,051 169,042 
Amortization Expense43,995 28,754 27,706 
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs2,829 2,721 2,326 
Use of Renewable Energy Credits for Compliance45,815 44,517 37,141 
Deferred Income Taxes37,217 39,408 41,614 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Expense15,342 14,883 17,762 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Funding(20,806)(21,018)(16,749)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(17,885)(22,847)(15,222)
Regulatory Deferral, ACC Refund Order (7,705)7,705 
Changes in Current Assets and Current Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable(18,738)(19,019)9,238 
Materials, Supplies, and Fuel Inventory(18,445)(3,460)(16,236)
Regulatory Assets(59,542)5,339 (20,934)
Other Current Assets4,670 (8,311)(475)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Charges14,979 (20,885)(27,776)
Income Taxes Payable(3,271)10,245 6,072 
Regulatory Liabilities(9,599)41,287 (1,626)
Other, Net8,724 1,689 8,140 
Net Cash Flows—Operating Activities428,054 466,054 414,243 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital Expenditures(499,405)(839,958)(607,593)
Proceeds from Sale, Springerville Common Facilities 29,569 — 
Purchase Intangibles, Renewable Energy Credits(55,297)(53,509)(51,699)
Purchase, Other Investments (8,500)— 
Contributions in Aid of Construction5,678 4,615 6,607 
Note Receivable — (1,000)
Net Cash Flows—Investing Activities(549,024)(867,783)(653,685)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from Borrowings, Revolving Credit Facility50,000 105,000 — 
Repayments of Borrowings, Revolving Credit Facility(35,000)(105,000)— 
Proceeds from Borrowings, Term Loan 60,000 165,000 
Repayments of Borrowings, Term Loan (225,000)— 
Proceeds from Issuance, Long-Term DebtNet of Discount
322,231 645,768 — 
Repayments of Long-Term Debt(250,000)(180,410)(14,700)
Dividends Paid to Parent(62,500)(75,000)(75,000)
Payments of Finance Lease Obligations (17,087)(10,890)
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs(4,382)(6,327)(757)
Contributions from Parent50,000 250,000 50,000 
Other2,107 3,316 1,514 
Net Cash Flows—Financing Activities72,456 455,260 115,167 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash(48,514)53,531 (124,275)
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Period82,003 28,472 152,747 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, End of Period$33,489 $82,003 $28,472 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

41

37







TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities     
Net Income$186,515
 $188,323
 $176,668
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Depreciation Expense169,042
 158,310
 152,874
Amortization Expense27,706
 26,052
 22,255
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs2,326
 2,339
 2,349
Use of Renewable Energy Credits for Compliance37,141
 32,350
 25,453
Deferred Income Taxes41,614
 56,066
 100,762
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Expense17,762
 15,303
 16,039
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Funding(16,749) (26,673) (14,430)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(15,222) (8,117) (5,322)
FERC Transmission Refund Payable
 
 (4,878)
Regulatory Deferral, ACC Refund Order7,705
 (1,562) 
Changes in Current Assets and Current Liabilities:     
Accounts Receivable9,238
 (26,729) (13,219)
Materials, Supplies, and Fuel Inventory(16,236) (2,357) 175
Regulatory Assets(20,934) (4,080) (3,942)
Other Current Assets(475) (1,746) (751)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Charges(27,776) 33,536
 9,790
Income Taxes Receivable6,072
 (13,004) 
Regulatory Liabilities(1,626) 14,028
 (20,227)
Other, Net8,140
 15,187
 4,728
Net Cash Flows—Operating Activities414,243
 457,226
 448,324
Cash Flows from Investing Activities     
Capital Expenditures(607,593) (392,522) (345,617)
Purchase Intangibles, Renewable Energy Credits(51,699) (51,327) (51,179)
Contributions in Aid of Construction6,607
 10,817
 4,983
Note Receivable(1,000) 
 
Net Cash Flows—Investing Activities(653,685) (433,032) (391,813)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities     
Proceeds from Borrowings, Revolving Credit Facility
 171,000
 70,000
Repayments of Borrowings, Revolving Credit Facility
 (206,000) (35,000)
Proceeds from Borrowings, Term Loan165,000
 
 
Proceeds from Issuance, Long-Term DebtNet of Discount

 298,869
 
Repayments of Long-Term Debt(14,700) (136,700) 
Dividends Paid to Parent(75,000) (85,000) (70,000)
Payments of Finance Lease Obligations(10,890) (10,930) (15,571)
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs(757) (3,265) (245)
Contribution from Parent50,000
 50,000
 
Other, Net1,514
 1,078
 481
Net Cash Flows—Financing Activities115,167
 79,052
 (50,335)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash(124,275) 103,246
 6,176
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Period152,747
 49,501
 43,325
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, End of Period$28,472
 $152,747
 $49,501
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

38







TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
December 31,December 31,
2019 201820212020
ASSETS   ASSETS
Utility Plant   Utility Plant
Plant in Service$6,663,912
 $6,020,469
Plant in Service$7,797,935 $7,073,292 
Utility Plant Under Finance Leases151,467
 248,635
Construction Work in Progress303,488
 258,965
Construction Work in Progress320,931 627,382 
Total Utility Plant7,118,867
 6,528,069
Total Utility Plant8,118,866 7,700,674 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization(2,506,686) (2,293,783)Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization(2,786,839)(2,645,333)
Accumulated Amortization of Finance Lease Assets(77,285) (73,646)
Total Utility Plant, Net4,534,896
 4,160,640
Total Utility Plant, Net5,332,027 5,055,341 
   
Investments and Other Property62,136
 50,952
Investments and Other Property81,958 76,299 
   
Current Assets   Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents9,762
 138,114
Cash and Cash Equivalents9,970 60,960 
Accounts Receivable, Net154,847
 172,367
Accounts Receivable (Net of Allowance for Credit Losses of $10,044 and $13,260)Accounts Receivable (Net of Allowance for Credit Losses of $10,044 and $13,260)192,579 173,412 
Fuel Inventory23,731
 22,783
Fuel Inventory26,971 21,946 
Materials and Supplies121,542
 107,990
Materials and Supplies141,677 126,788 
Regulatory Assets138,412
 106,725
Regulatory Assets116,442 123,588 
Derivative Instruments3,596
 3,929
Derivative Instruments19,406 16,094 
Other21,416
 25,571
Other24,229 23,895 
Total Current Assets473,306
 577,479
Total Current Assets531,274 546,683 
Regulatory and Other Assets  
Regulatory and Other Assets
Regulatory Assets326,860
 293,078
Regulatory Assets267,669 318,474 
Derivative Instruments2,763
 8,402
Derivative Instruments14,392 725 
Other89,196
 68,656
Other94,420 92,605 
Total Regulatory and Other Assets418,819
 370,136
Total Regulatory and Other Assets376,481 411,804 
Total Assets$5,489,157
 $5,159,207
Total Assets$6,321,740 $6,090,127 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
(Continued)

42
39


TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
December 31,December 31,
2019 201820212020
CAPITALIZATION AND OTHER LIABILITIES   CAPITALIZATION AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Capitalization   Capitalization
Common Stock Equity:   Common Stock Equity:
Common Stock (No Par Value, 75,000,000 Shares Authorized, 32,139,434 Shares Outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018)$1,396,539
 $1,346,539
Common Stock (No Par Value, 75,000,000 Shares Authorized, 32,139,434 Shares Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020)Common Stock (No Par Value, 75,000,000 Shares Authorized, 32,139,434 Shares Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020)$1,696,539 $1,646,539 
Capital Stock Expense(6,357) (6,357)Capital Stock Expense(6,357)(6,357)
Retained Earnings595,792
 484,277
Retained Earnings850,942 712,197 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(7,771) (4,714)Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(9,915)(10,942)
Total Common Stock Equity1,978,203
 1,819,745
Total Common Stock Equity2,531,209 2,341,437 
Preferred Stock (No Par Value, 1,000,000 Shares Authorized, None Outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018)
 
Finance Lease Obligations67,316
 19,773
Preferred Stock (No Par Value, 1,000,000 Shares Authorized, None Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020)Preferred Stock (No Par Value, 1,000,000 Shares Authorized, None Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and 2020) — 
Long-Term Debt, Net1,522,087
 1,615,252
Long-Term Debt, Net2,134,534 1,814,059 
Total Capitalization3,567,606
 3,454,770
Total Capitalization4,665,743 4,155,496 
Current Liabilities   Current Liabilities
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt80,330
 
Borrowings Under Credit Agreements165,000
 
Finance Lease Obligations17,086
 172,510
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt, NetCurrent Maturities of Long-Term Debt, Net 249,752 
Borrowings Under Credit AgreementBorrowings Under Credit Agreement15,000 — 
Accounts Payable136,465
 133,012
Accounts Payable139,329 109,461 
Accrued Taxes Other than Income Taxes42,741
 41,686
Accrued Taxes Other than Income Taxes53,534 50,278 
Accrued Employee Expenses32,567
 34,339
Accrued Employee Expenses36,217 35,129 
Accrued Interest16,700
 17,927
Accrued Interest16,265 16,337 
Regulatory Liabilities96,017
 95,094
Regulatory Liabilities111,356 151,189 
Customer Deposits24,568
 27,650
Customer Deposits12,791 16,450 
Derivative Instruments27,615
 18,137
Derivative Instruments15,854 27,789 
Other23,678
 21,555
Other25,358 22,031 
Total Current Liabilities662,767
 561,910
Total Current Liabilities425,704 678,416 
Regulatory and Other Liabilities   Regulatory and Other Liabilities
Deferred Income Taxes, Net432,484
 369,705
Deferred Income Taxes, Net548,750 492,919 
Regulatory Liabilities477,495
 512,425
Regulatory Liabilities352,226 390,164 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits133,452
 117,472
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits120,020 163,652 
Derivative Instruments48,697
 19,361
Derivative Instruments3,848 37,958 
Other166,656
 123,564
Other205,449 171,522 
Total Regulatory and Other Liabilities1,258,784
 1,142,527
Total Regulatory and Other Liabilities1,230,293 1,256,215 
   
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments and Contingencies00
   
Total Capitalization and Other Liabilities$5,489,157
 $5,159,207
Total Capitalization and Other Liabilities$6,321,740 $6,090,127 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
(Concluded)

43

40







TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands)
Common StockCapital Stock ExpenseRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive LossTotal Stockholder's Equity
Common Stock Capital Stock Expense Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Total Stockholder's Equity
Balances as of December 31, 2016$1,296,539
 $(6,357) $273,408
 $(4,555) $1,559,035
Net Income    176,668
   176,668
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax      (1,671) (1,671)
Dividends Declared to Parent    (70,000)   (70,000)
Balances as of December 31, 20171,296,539
 (6,357) 380,076
 (6,226) 1,664,032
Net Income    188,323
   188,323
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax      2,390
 2,390
Dividends Declared to Parent    (85,000)   (85,000)
Contribution from Parent50,000
       50,000
Adoption of ASU, Cumulative Effect Adjustment    878
 (878) 
Balances as of December 31, 20181,346,539
 (6,357) 484,277
 (4,714) 1,819,745
Balances as of December 31, 2018$1,346,539 $(6,357)$484,277 $(4,714)$1,819,745 
Net Income    186,515
   186,515
Net Income186,515 186,515 
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax      (3,057) (3,057)Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax(3,057)(3,057)
Dividends Declared to Parent    (75,000)   (75,000)Dividends Declared to Parent(75,000)(75,000)
Contribution from Parent50,000
       50,000
Contribution from Parent50,000 50,000 
Balances as of December 31, 2019$1,396,539
 $(6,357) $595,792
 $(7,771) $1,978,203
Balances as of December 31, 2019$1,396,539 $(6,357)$595,792 $(7,771)$1,978,203 
Net IncomeNet Income191,405 191,405 
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of TaxOther Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax(3,171)(3,171)
Dividends Declared to ParentDividends Declared to Parent(75,000)(75,000)
Contribution from ParentContribution from Parent250,000 250,000 
Balances as of December 31, 2020Balances as of December 31, 2020$1,646,539 $(6,357)$712,197 $(10,942)$2,341,437 
Net IncomeNet Income201,245 201,245 
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of TaxOther Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax1,027 1,027 
Dividends Declared to ParentDividends Declared to Parent(62,500)(62,500)
Contribution from ParentContribution from Parent50,000 50,000 
Balances as of December 31, 2021Balances as of December 31, 2021$1,696,539 $(6,357)$850,942 $(9,915)$2,531,209 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


41
44


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



NOTE 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
TEP is a regulated utility that generates, transmits, and distributes electricity to approximately 429,000438,000 retail customers in a 1,155 square mile area in southeastern Arizona. TEP also sells electricity to other utilities and power marketing entities, located primarily in the western United States. TEP is a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of UNS Energy, a utility services holding company. UNS Energy is an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Fortis.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
TEP's consolidated financial statements and disclosures are presented in accordance with GAAP, including specific accounting guidance for regulated operations. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TEP and its subsidiaries. In the consolidation process, accounts of the parent and subsidiaries are combined and intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. TEP jointly owns several generation and transmission facilities with both affiliated and non-affiliated entities. The Company records its proportionate share of: (i) jointly-owned facilities in Utility Plant on the Consolidated Balance Sheets; and (ii) operating costs associated with these facilities in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 3 for additional information regarding utility plant.
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Accounting for Regulated Operations
TEP applies accounting standards that recognize the economic effects of rate regulation. As a result, TEP capitalizes certain costs that would be recorded as expense or in AOCI by unregulated companies.Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred because they are probable of future recovery in Retail Rates charged to retail customers or in rates charged to wholesale customers through transmission tariffs. Regulatory liabilities generally represent expected future costs that have already been collected from customers or amounts that are expected to be returned to customers through billing reductions in future periods.
Estimates of recovering deferred costs and returning deferred credits are based on specific ratemaking decisions or precedent for each item. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment in the rate setting process. TEP evaluates regulatory assets and liabilities each period and believes future recovery or settlement is probable. If future recovery of costs ceases to be probable, the assets would be written off as a charge to current period earnings or AOCI. See Note 2 for additional information regarding regulatory matters.
TEP applies regulatory accounting as the following conditions exist:
An independent regulator sets rates;
The regulator sets the rates to recover the specific enterprise’s costs of providing service; and
Rates are set at levels that will recover the entity’s costs and can be charged to and collected from ratepayers.
Variable Interest Entities
TEP regularly reviews contracts to determine if it has a variable interest in an entity, if that entity is a VIE,Variable Interest Entity (VIE), and if TEP is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the VIE when it has: (i) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
TEP has entered into long-term renewable PPAs with various entities. Some of these entities are VIEs due to the long-term fixed price component in the agreements. These PPAs effectively transfer commodity price risk to TEP, the buyer of the power, creating a variable interest. TEP has determined it is not a primary beneficiary of these VIEs as it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. TEP reconsiders whether it is athe primary beneficiary of the VIEs on a quarterly basis.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet that relate to variable interests under long-term PPAs are predominantly related to working capital accounts and generally represent the amounts owed by TEP for the deliveries associated with the current billing cycle. TEP's maximum exposure to loss is limited to the cost of replacing the power if the providers do not meet the production guarantee. However, the exposure to loss is mitigated as the Company would likely recover these costs through cost recovery mechanisms. See Note 2 for additional information related to cost recovery mechanisms.

45
42

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED AND ADOPTED
The following new authoritative accounting guidance issued by the FASB has been adopted as of January 1, 2019. Unless otherwise indicated, adoption of the new guidance in each instance had an insignificant impact on TEP’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and disclosures.
Leases
TEP adopted accounting guidance that requires lessees to recognize a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of future lease payments, and a right-of-use asset for all leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. The new lease standard also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures for both lessees and lessors. TEP applied the transition provisions of the new standard as of the adoption date and did not retrospectively adjust prior periods. In addition, TEP elected a package of practical expedients that allowed it to not reassess: (i) whether existing contracts are or contain a lease; (ii) the lease classification of existing leases; or (iii) the initial direct costs for existing leases. Furthermore, TEP elected a practical expedient that permitted it to not evaluate existing land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases. The new lease guidance has been applied on a prospective basis to all new or modified land easements since January 1, 2019. Finally, TEP utilized the hindsight practical expedient in the transition provisions to determine the lease term. TEP did not identify or record an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on adoption. See Note 8 for additional disclosure about TEP’s leasing arrangements.
Internal-Use Software
TEP early adopted accounting guidance that clarifies accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract. Under the new guidance, customers apply the same criteria for capitalizing implementation costs as they would for an arrangement that has a software license. The guidance also provides specific requirements for the classification and presentation of the capitalized implementation costs and the related amortization of those costs. TEP adopted the standard prospectively.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ISSUED AND NOT YET ADOPTED
New authoritative accounting guidance issued by the FASB was assessed and either determined to not be applicable or is expected to have an insignificant impact on TEP’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and disclosures.
USE OF ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Management uses estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements according to GAAP. These estimates and assumptions affect:
assets and liabilities in the balance sheet at the dates of the financial statements;
disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements; and
revenues and expenses in the income statement during the periods presented.
Because these estimates involve judgments based upon management's evaluation of relevant facts and circumstances, actual results may differ from these estimates.
Asset Retirement Obligations
TEP has identified legal AROs related to the retirement of certain generation assets as a result of environmental regulations, decommissioning agreements, and land leases or land easement agreements. Liabilities are recorded for legal AROs in the period in which they are incurred if it can be reasonably estimated. When a new obligation is recorded, the cost of the liability is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The increase in the liability due to the passage of time is recorded by recognizing accretion expense in Operations and Maintenance Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset or, when applicable, the term of the lease. TEP primarily defers the accretion and depreciation expense associated with its legal AROs into a regulatory asset or liability account based on the ACCACC's approval of these costs in its depreciation rates.
Depreciation rates also include a component for estimated future removal costs that have not been identified as legal obligations. TEP recovers estimated future removal costs in Retail Rates and records an obligation for estimated costs of removal as regulatory liabilities.

43


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Contingencies
Reserves for specific legal proceedings are established when the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in predicting the outcome of these suitslegal proceedings and claims, many of which take years to complete. TEP identifies certain other legal matters where the Company believes an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible or no estimate of possible losses can be made. All contingencies are regularly reviewed to determine whether the likelihood of loss has changed and to assess whether a reasonable estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
TEP considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at acquisition to be cash equivalents.
46


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
RESTRICTED CASH
Restricted cash includes cash balances restricted with respect to withdrawal or usage based on contractual or regulatory considerations. The following table presents the line items and amounts of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported inon the balance sheet and reconciles their sum to the cash flow statement:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10
 $138
 $38
Restricted Cash included in:     
Investments and Other Property16
 14
 11
Current Assets—Other2
 1
 1
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash$28
 $153
 $50

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Cash and Cash Equivalents$10 $61 $10 
Restricted Cash included in:
Investments and Other Property20 19 16 
Current Assets—Other
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash$33 $82 $28 
Restricted cash included in Investments and Other Property on the Consolidated Balance Sheets represents cash contractually required to be set aside to pay TEP's share of mine reclamation costs at San Juan and various contractual agreements. Restricted cash included in Current Assets—Other represents the current portion of TEP's share of San Juan's mine reclamation costs.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTSCREDIT LOSSES
TEP records an allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses to reduce accounts receivable for amounts estimated to be uncollectible. The allowance is determinedestimated based on historical bad debtcredit loss patterns, retail sales, current conditions, and economic conditions.reasonable and supportable forecasts. Accounts receivable are charged-offwritten-off in the period in which the receivable is deemed uncollectible. The change inSee Note 5 for information regarding collection activity and adjustments to the balance ofallowance for credit losses related to the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts included in Accounts Receivable, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is summarized as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Beginning of Period$5
 $5
 $5
Additions Charged to Cost and Expense4
 3
 3
Write-offs(3) (3) (3)
End of Period$6
 $5
 $5

COVID-19 pandemic.
INVENTORY
TEP values materials, supplies, and fuel inventory at the lower of weighted average cost and net realizable value. Materials and supplies consist of generation, transmission, and distribution construction and repair materials. The majority of TEP's inventory will be recovered in rates charged to ratepayers. Handling and procurement costs (such as labor, overhead costs, and transportation costs) are capitalized as part of the cost of the inventory.
UTILITY PLANT
Utility plant includes the business property and equipment that supports electric service, consisting primarily of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. Utility plant is reported at original cost. Original cost includes materials and labor, contractor services, construction overhead (when applicable), and AFUDC, less contributions in aid of construction.

44


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The cost of repairs and maintenance, including planned generation overhauls, are expensed to Operations and Maintenance Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income as costs are incurred.
When TEP determines it is probable that a utility plant asset will be abandoned or retired early, the cost of that asset is removed from utility plant-in-service and is recorded as a regulatory asset if recovery is probable. When TEP retires a unit of regulated property, accumulated depreciation is reduced by the original cost plus removal costs less any salvage value. There is no impact to the income statement.
AFUDC and Capitalized Interest
AFUDC reflects the cost of debt and equity funds used to finance construction and is capitalized as part of the cost of regulated utility plant. AFUDC amounts are capitalized and amortized through depreciation expense as a recoverable cost in Retail Rates. The capitalized interest that relates to debt is recorded in Allowance For Borrowed Funds on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The capitalized cost for equity funds is recorded in Allowance For Equity Funds on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
47


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The average AFUDC rates on regulated construction expenditures are included in the table below:
 2019 2018 2017
Average AFUDC Rates7.86% 7.12% 7.31%

202120202019
Average AFUDC Rates6.88 %6.63 %7.86 %
Depreciation
Depreciation is recorded for owned utility plant on a group method straight-line basis, excluding software intangible plant, at depreciation rates based on the economic lives of the assets.assets, including estimates for salvage value and removal costs. See Note 3 for additional information regarding utility plant. The ACC approves depreciation rates for all generation, distribution, and distributiongeneral plant assets. Transmission assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC. Depreciation rates are based on average useful lives and include estimates for salvage value and removal costs.
Below are the summarized average annual depreciation rates for all utility plant:
 2019 2018 2017
Average Annual Depreciation Rates3.08% 3.13% 2.97%

202120202019
Average Annual Depreciation Rates3.30 %3.15 %3.08 %
Computer Software and Cloud Computing Costs
Costs incurred to purchase and develop internal use computer software and cloud computing arrangements that include a software license are capitalized and amortized over the estimated economic life of the product. Implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract are included in Regulatory and Other Assets—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the life of the service agreement.three to five years. Amortization expense is presented in Operations and Maintenance Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. If the associated software is no longer useful or impaired, the carrying value is reduced and recorded as an expense inon the income statement.
EVALUATION OF ASSETS FOR IMPAIRMENT
Long-lived assets and investments are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. If estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, the Company estimates the fair value and records an impairment for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. For these estimates, TEP may consider data from multiple valuation methods, including data from market participants. The Company exercises judgment to: (i) estimate the future cash flows and the useful lives of long-lived assets; and (ii) determine the Company’s intent to use the assets. TEP’s intent to use or dispose of assets is subject to re-evaluation and can change over time.
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS
Costs to issue debt are deferred and amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the debt. Deferred debt issuance costs are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability. These costs include underwriters’ commissions, discounts or premiums, and other costs such as legal, accounting, regulatory fees, and printing costs.
TEP accounts for debt issuance costs related to credit facility arrangements as an asset.

45


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The gains and losses on reacquired debt associated with regulated operations are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the original debt.
LEASES
When a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration, a right-of-use asset and lease liability are recognized. TEP measures the right-of-use asset and lease liability at the present value of future lease payments, excluding variable payments based on usage or performance. TEP calculates the present value using the rate implicit in the lease or a lease-specific secured interest rate based on the lease term. TEP has lease agreements with lease components (e.g., rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) and nonleasenon-lease components (e.g., common area maintenance costs), which are accounted for as a single lease component. TEP includes options to extend a lease in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded inon the balance sheet.
OPERATING REVENUES
TEP earns the majority of its revenues from the sale of power to retail and wholesale customers based on regulator-approved tariff rates. Most of the Company's contracts have a single performance obligation, the delivery of power. TEP satisfies the
48


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
performance obligation over time as power is delivered and control is transferred to the customer. The Company bills for power sales based on the reading of electric meters on a systematic basis throughout the month. In general, TEP's contracts have payment terms of 10 to 20 days from the date the bill is rendered. TEP considers any payment not received by the due date delinquent and charges the customer a late payment fee.fee, except during service disconnection moratoriums. Generally, customers are not charged a late payment fee when service disconnection moratoriums are in effect. No component of the transaction price is allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations.
TEP has certain contracts with variable transaction pricing that require it to estimate the resulting variable consideration. TEP estimates variable consideration at the most likely amount to which the Companyit expects to be entitled and recognizes a refund liability until TEPit is certain that the Companyit will be entitled to the consideration. The Company includes estimated amounts of variable consideration in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that changes in its estimate will not result in significant reversals of revenue in subsequent periods. See Note 4 for the disaggregation of TEP's Operating Revenues.
PURCHASED POWER AND FUEL ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE
TEP recovers the actual fuel, purchased power, and transmission costs to provide electric service to retail customers through base fuel rates and through a PPFAC mechanism. The ACC periodically adjusts the PPFAC rate at which TEP recovers these costs. The difference between costs recovered through rates and actual fuel, purchased power, transmission, and other approved costs to provide retail electric service is deferred. Cost over-recoveries are deferred as regulatory liabilities, and cost under-recoveries are deferred as regulatory assets. See Note 2 for additional information regarding regulatory matters.
RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS
The ACC’s RES requires Arizona regulated utilities to increase their use of renewable energy each year until it represents at least 15% of their total annual retail energy requirements by 2025, with DG accounting for 30% of the annual renewable energy requirement. Arizona utilities must file an annual RES implementation planplans for review and approval by the ACC. The approved costs of carrying out this plan are recovered from retail customers through thea RES surcharge. The associated lost revenues attributable to meeting DG targets are partially recovered through the LFCR mechanism.
TEP is required to implement cost-effective DSM programs to comply with the ACC’s EE Standards. The EE Standards provide regulated utilities a DSM surcharge to recover from retail customers the costs to implement DSM programs. The EE Standards require increasingAs of February 10, 2022, the ACC has not set annual targetedtarget retail kWh savings equal to 22% by 2020.requirements for future years. The associated lost revenues attributable to meeting these targets are partially recovered through the LFCR mechanism.
Any RES or DSM surcharges collected above or below the costs incurred to implement the plans are deferred and reflected in the balance sheet as a regulatory liability or asset. TEP recognizes RES and DSM surcharge revenue in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income in amounts necessary to offset recognized qualifying expenditures.
RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS
The ACC measures compliance with the RES requirements through RECs. A REC represents one kWh generated from renewable resources. When TEP purchases renewable energy, the premium paid above the market cost of conventional power or the REC purchase price equals the REC cost recoverable through the RES surcharge. As described above, the market cost of conventional power or contract price for power is recoverable through the PPFAC mechanism.

46


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



When RECs are purchased, TEP records the cost of the RECs, (anan indefinite-lived intangible asset)asset, as other assets and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect the obligation to use the RECs for future RES compliance. When RECs are reported to the ACC for compliance with RES requirements, TEP recognizes purchased power expense and otherretail revenues in an equal amount. See Note 2 for additional information regarding regulatory matters. The table below summarizes the balance of TEP's RECs that are included in Regulatory and Other Assets—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$55
 $42
Purchased45
 45
Used for Compliance(37) (32)
End of Period$63
 $55

December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Beginning of Period$66 $63 
Purchased49 48 
Used for Compliance(46)(45)
End of Period$69 $66 
TEP expenses the cost of internally developed RECs, including PBI activity that is not included in the table above and recoverable through the RES surcharge.
49


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
TAXES OTHER THAN INCOME TAXES
TEP acts as a conduit or collection agent for sales taxes, utility taxes, franchise fees, and regulatory assessments. Trade receivables are recorded as the Company bills customers for these taxes and assessments. Simultaneously, liabilities payable to governmental agencies are recorded in the balance sheet for these taxes and assessments. These amounts are not reflected in the income statement.
Payroll Tax
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. As permitted by the CARES Act, TEP deferred payment of the employer's portion of social security taxes. In 2020, TEP recorded total deferred deposits of $7 million in Accrued Taxes Other than Income Taxes and Regulatory and Other Liabilities—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. TEP paid $3 million in December 2021 and expects to pay the remaining deferred deposits to the IRS in 2022.
INCOME TAXES
Due to the difference between GAAP and income tax laws, many transactions are treated differently for income tax purposes than for financial statement presentation purposes. Temporary differences are accounted for by recording deferred income tax assets and liabilities inon the balance sheet. These assets and liabilities are recorded using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect when the deferred tax assets and liabilities are realized or settled. TEP reduces deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or the entire deferred income tax asset, will not be realized.
Tax benefits are recognized when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit recorded is the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest expense accruals relating to income tax obligations are recorded in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
TEP accounts for federal energy credits generated prior to 2013 using the grant accounting model. The credit is treated as deferred revenue, which is recognized over the depreciable life of the underlying asset. The deferred tax benefit of the credit is treated as a reduction to income tax expense in the year the credit arises. TEP had an aggregate liability balance of $6$5 million and $7$6 million related to federal energy credits generated prior to 2013 included in Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. Federal energy credits generated since 2013 are deferred and amortized as a reduction in income tax expense over the tax life of the underlying asset. TEP had an aggregate liability balance of $2$1 million and $6$2 million related to federal energy credits generated since 2013 included in Regulatory Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively. Income tax expense attributable to the reduction in tax basis is accounted for in the year the federal energy credit is generated and is deferred as a regulatory asset. All other federal and state income tax credits are treated as a reduction to income tax expense in the year the credit arises.
TEP records income tax liabilities based on TEP's taxable income as reported in the consolidated tax return of FortisUS.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
TEP sponsors noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans for substantially all employees and certain affiliate employees. Benefits are based on years of service and average compensation. The Company also provides limited healthcare and life insurance benefits for retirees.
The Company recognizes the underfunded status of defined benefit pension plans as a liability in the balance sheet. The underfunded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the pension plans’plan assets and the projected benefit obligation for the pension plans.plans or accumulated postretirement obligation for the other postretirement plan. TEP recognizes a regulatory asset to the extent these future costs are probable of recovery in

47


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



the rates charged to retail customers. The Company expects recovery of these costs over the estimated service lives of employees.
Additionally, TEP maintains a SERP for senior management. Changes in SERP benefit obligations are recognized as a component of AOCI.
Pension and other postretirement benefit expenses are determined by actuarial valuations based on assumptions that the Company evaluates annually. See Note 10 for additional information regarding the employee benefit plans.
50


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
FAIR VALUE
As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange, and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered in determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange. See Note 13 for additional information regarding fair value.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company uses various physical and financial derivative instruments, including forward contracts, financial swaps, and call and put options, to: (i) meet forecasted load and reserve requirements; and (ii) reduce exposure to energy commodity price volatility; and (iii) hedge interest rate risk exposure.volatility. Derivative instruments that do not meet the normal purchase or normal sale scope exception are recognized as either assets or liabilities inon the balance sheet and are measured at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.
Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for, and may be designated as, normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not recorded at fair value and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy, and capacity inon the income statement.
For derivatives designated as hedging contracts, TEP formally assesses, at inception, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. Also, TEP formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy.
For derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. See Note 13 for additional information regarding derivative instruments.

NOTE 2. REGULATORY MATTERS
The ACC and the FERC each regulate portions of the utility accounting practices and rates of TEP. The ACC regulates rates charged to retail customers, the siting of generation and transmission facilities, the issuance of securities, transactions with affiliated parties, and other utility matters. The ACC also enacts other regulations and policies that can affect the Company's business decisions and accounting practices. The FERC regulates rates and services for electric transmission and wholesale power sales in interstate commerce.
2019 ACC RATE CASE MATTERS
2020 Rate Order
In April 2019, TEP filed a general rate case withDecember 2020, the ACC based onissued a test year ended December 31, 2018.rate order for new rates that took effect January 1, 2021.
TEP's key proposalsProvisions of the rate case, adjusted for rebuttal testimony filed in November 2019 include:2020 Rate Order include, but are not limited to:
a non-fuel retail revenue increase of $99 million, partially offset by a reduction in base fuel revenue of approximately $39 million for a net increase of $60$58 million over test year retail revenues;

48


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



a 7.49%7.04% return on original cost rate base of $2.7 billion, which includes a cost of equity of 10.00%9.15% and an average cost of debt of 4.65%; and
a requestcapital structure for rate making purposes of approximately 53% common equity and 47% long-term debt.
In addition, the 2020 Rate Order established a second phase of TEP’s rate case to recover costsaddress the impact on certain communities due to the closures of changesfossil-based generation facilities (Phase 2). In January 2021, the ACC staff opened a generic docket related to this matter and will consider additional evidence or recommendations in generation resources, including: (i)Phase 2. In 2021, there was limited activity in this docket. On January 19, 2022, the retirementACC issued an order delaying Phase 2 until after the completion of Navajo and Sundt Units 1 and 2; and (ii) the replacement generation capacity associated with the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 and the installation of RICE units at Sundt;
a TEAM that would be updated for income tax changes that materially affect TEP’s authorized revenue requirement; and
a TCA mechanism, updated annually, allowing TEP to recover any changes in transmission costs approved by the FERC.
Hearings before an ALJ were held in January and February 2020. The hearing will resume in April 2020. TEP requested new rates to be implemented by May 1, 2020.
generic docket. TEP cannot predict the timing or outcome of the proceeding.these proceedings.
51


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
2019 FERC RATE CASERate Case
In 2019, the FERC issued an order approving TEP's proposed OATT revisions effective August 1, 2019, subject to refund.refund and further proceedings.
Provisions of the order include, but are not limited to:
replacing TEP's stated transmission rates with a single forward-looking formula rate;
a 10.4% return on equity; and
elimination of transmission rates that are bifurcated between high-voltage and lower-voltage facilities, as well as elimination of the bifurcated loss factor rate.factor.
The requested forward-looking formula rate is intended to allow for a more timely recovery of transmission relatedtransmission-related costs. As part of the order, the FERC established hearing and settlement procedures. In February 2021, a Presiding Judge was appointed to continue the formula rate case proceeding after the settlement procedures resulted in an impasse. In August 2021, TEP filed an unopposed motion requesting that the Chief Judge suspend the litigation procedural schedule to allow the parties time to prepare and all revisionsfile a comprehensive settlement package, as parties in the proceeding reached a settlement in principle. The motion was granted and in December 2021 the settlement agreement was filed with the FERC. On February 1, 2022, the Presiding Judge certified and recommended approval by the FERC of the proposed settlement.
Provisions of the proposed settlement include, but are not limited to:
replacing TEP's stated transmission rates with a single forward-looking formula rate;
a 9.79% return on equity;
elimination of transmission rates that are bifurcated between high-voltage and lower-voltage facilities, as well as elimination of the bifurcated loss factor;
a direct assignment of 25% of transmission costs allocated to retail customers and 75% allocated between wholesale and retail customers beginning January 1, 2022, through the date that is the later of: (i) December 31, 2031; or (ii) the date on which TEP has no Industrial Development Revenue Bonds outstanding;
a refund of the difference in rates for the period commencing August 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021; and
$4 million in costs related to the abandoned Nogales transmission line to be amortized over 10 years.
As a result of the proposed settlement, in December 2021 TEP recognized: (i) $12 million of wholesale revenue, which includes $4 million and $3 million for transmission service provided in 2020 and 2019, respectively; and (ii) a decrease of $3 million in alternative revenues. The agreement does not go into effect until final approval from the FERC is received. TEP cannot predict the final timing of the proceedings. All rates charged under the revised OATT inpursuant to the FERC order are subject to refund. As of December 31, 2019,refund until the proceeding concludes. TEP had reserved $4$15 million of wholesale revenues reserved in Current Liabilities—Regulatory Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a resultof December 31, 2021 and 2020.
OTHER FERC MATTERS
In January 2021, the FERC notified TEP that it was commencing an audit that intends to evaluate TEP's compliance with: (i) the accounting requirements of the Uniform System of Accounts; and (ii) the reporting requirements of the FERC proceedings.Form 1 Annual Report and Supplemental Form 3-Q Quarterly Financial Reports. The audit covers the period of January 1, 2018 to the present. The audit is ongoing and TEP cannot predict the outcome or findings, if any, of the proceeding.
Abandoned Plant Costs
Also in May 2019, TEP filed with the FERC a request to recover through its OATT abandoned plant costs related to the abandoned Sahuarita, Arizona to Nogales, Arizona transmission line. TEP requested authorization to recover 100% of the approximately $9 million that it incurred in developing the transmission line. The filing requests that the abandoned plant costs be included in TEP's transmission rate. On September 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order allowing TEP to recover 50% of its costs in its formula rate and established hearing and settlement procedures. TEP plans to incorporate the abandoned plant costs into its formula rate effective January 1, 2020, subject to refund. On September 26, 2019, the FERC issued an order consolidating the 2019 FERC Rate Case and Abandoned Plant Costs proceedings. In 2012, TEP wrote-off a portion of the deferred costs related to the Nogales transmission line. As of December 31, 2019, there was $4 million related to the Nogales transmission line recorded in Regulatory and Other Assets—Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
FEDERAL TAX LEGISLATION
Arizona Corporation Commission
In December 2017, the ACC opened a docket requesting that all regulated utilities submit proposals to address passing the benefits of the TCJA through to customers. In 2018, the ACC issued the ACC Refund Order. The ACC Refund Order represents the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate and an estimate of EDIT amortization that will be trued-up annually for actuals. The bill credit was designed to return the refund amount to customers based on forecasted kWh sales for the calendar year. Any over or under collected amounts are deferred to a regulatory liability or asset and will be used to adjust the following year's bill credit amounts. Customer bill credits are trued-up annually to reflect actuals for both kWh sales and EDIT amortization. TEP filed an information filing with the ACC to establish a 2020 customer refund of $35 million. The refund will be returned to customers through a combination of a customer bill credit and a regulatory liability in 2020. The customer bill credit will account for 50% of the returned savings in 2020 and through the completion of our next rate case.

49

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The table below summarizes the regulatory asset (liability) balance related to the ACC Refund Order:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$4
 $
ACC Approved Refund (Reduction in Operating Revenues)(34) (33)
Amount Returned to Customers Through Bill Credits22
 37
Regulatory Deferral8
 
End of Period$
 $4

See Note 14 for additional information regarding the TCJA.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
In 2018, the FERC issued the FERC Refund Order. In May 2018, TEP responded to the order and the FERC approved TEP's proposal of an overall transmission rate reduction of approximately 5.3%, reflecting the lower federal tax rate, to be effective March 21, 2018. As a result, TEP recognized a reduction in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income of $1 million in 2018.
Also in 2018, the FERC issued a NOPR regarding the effect of the TCJA and related EDIT amortization on rates. In November 2019, the FERC issued a final rule on the NOPR which required TEP to address the effect of the TCJA and related EDIT amortization in its next FERC rate case. As required by the final rule, TEP's 2019 FERC Rate Case addressed the effects of the TCJA and related EDIT amortization.
See Note 14 for additional information regarding the TCJA.audit at this time.
COST RECOVERY MECHANISMS
TEP has received regulatory decisions that allow for more timely recovery of certain costs through therecovery mechanisms. Cost recovery mechanisms that have a material impact on TEP's operations or financial results are described below.
Purchased Power and Fuel Adjustment Clause
TEP's PPFAC rate is typically adjusted annually eachon April 1st and goes into effect for the subsequent 12-month period unless the schedule is modified by the ACC. The PPFAC rate includes: (i) a forward component which is calculated by taking the difference between forecasted fuel and purchased power costs and the amount of those costs established in Retail Rates; and (ii) a true-up component that reconciles the differenceallows for reconciliation of differences between actual costs and those recovered in the preceding 12-month
52


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
period. On February 1, 2022, TEP filed a request with the ACC for approval of a rate adjustment for the PPFAC. The request presents two additional scenarios whereby the true-up component of the PPFAC rate is reset to reflect the recovery of the uncollected true-up balance over 18 and 24-month timeframes. TEP cannot predict the outcome of the proceeding.
The table below summarizes the PPFAC regulatory asset (liability) balance:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Beginning of Period$23 $36 
Deferred Fuel and Purchased Power Costs (1)
343 283 
PPFAC and Base Power Recoveries (2)
(275)(296)
End of Period$91 $23 
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$(17) $(9)
Deferred Fuel and Purchased Power Costs31
 2
PPFAC Refunds (Recoveries) (1)
22
 (10)
End of Period$36
 $(17)
(1)Includes costs eligible for recovery through the PPFAC and base power rates.
(1)
(2)In March 2021 and 2020, the ACC approved a PPFAC surcharge as part of TEP's annual rate adjustment request, which went into effect on June 1, 2021 and June 1, 2020.
In March 2019, the ACC approved a PPFAC credit as part of TEP's annual rate adjustment request.
Environmental Compliance Adjustor
The ECA allows for the recovery of capital carrying costs and incremental operations and maintenance costs related to environmental investments, provided that they are not already recovered in base rates or recovered through another commission-approved mechanism.
The eligible costs for the ECA are subject to a cap equal to 0.5% of total annual retail revenue. Beginning January 2021, the difference between costs recovered through rates and actual ECA eligible costs is deferred to a balancing account as approved as part of the 2020 Rate Order.
Tax Expense Adjustor Mechanism
The TEAM allows for the timely recovery of future significant income tax changes. It provides the Company the ability to pass through as a kWh surcharge: (i) the TCJA Regulatory Deferral balance to the initial 2021 TEAM rate; (ii) the change in EDIT compared to the test year; and (iii) the income tax effects of tax legislation that materially impacts TEP's 2018 test year revenue requirements. The TEAM went into effect January 1, 2021, as approved in the 2020 Rate Order. In 2021, TEP refunded $29 million to customers through the TEAM.
Federal Tax Legislation
In 2018, the ACC approved TEP’s proposal to return savings from TEP’s federal corporate income tax rate under the TCJA to its customers through a combination of customer bill credits and a regulatory liability deferral that reflected the return of a portion of the savings. As part of the 2020 Rate Order, the balances in the regulatory liability deferral and TCJA balancing account were moved to the TEAM regulatory account in December 2020.
Transmission Cost Adjustor
The TCA allows for timely recovery of actual costs required to provide transmission services to retail customers. The TCA is limited to the recovery, or refund, of costs associated with future changes in TEP's OATT rate. The Company recognized $2 millionfiles a notice with the ACC in December each year presenting a revised tariff that reflects the changes in the formula OATT rate which goes into effect in the first billing cycle in January. The TCA went into effect January 1, 2021, as approved in the 2020 Rate Order.
On February 8, 2022, the ACC approved TEP's motion to modify the TCA Plan of Administration to reflect the terms of the 2019 $3 million in 2018, and $1 million in 2017 related toFERC Rate Case proposed settlement agreement, pending the return on company-owned environmental investments included in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statementsconclusion of Income.

50

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



that proceeding.
Renewable Energy Standard
The ACC’s RES requires Arizona regulated utilities to increase their use of renewable energy each year until it represents at least 15% of their total annual retail energy requirements by 2025, with DG accounting for 30% of the annual renewable energy requirement. Arizona utilities are required to file an annual RES implementation plan for review and approval by the ACC.
The renewable energy requirement in 2021 was 11% of retail electric sales. In September 2019, the ACC approved TEP's 2019 RES implementation plan with a budget amount of $55 million. The recovery funds the following: (i) above market cost of renewable power purchases; (ii) previously awarded incentives for customer-installed DG; and (iii) various other program costs. The Company recognized less than$1 million in 2019, and $1 million in 2018 and 2017 of revenue as a return on company-owned solar projects. The return on company-owned solar projects is included in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income. TEP is no longer requesting recovery on company-owned solar projects through the RES mechanism and requests recovery of these types of costs through its rate case process.
In 2019,2021, the percentage of TEP's retail kWh sales attributable to the RES was approximately 16%, exceeding26%.
In September 2021, the overall 2019 RES requirement of 9%. The ACC approved TEP's 2021 RES implementation plan for the waiveryears 2021 and 2022 with a budget of $66 million. The approved amounts fund: (i) above market cost of renewable power purchases; (ii) previously awarded
53


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
incentives for customer-installed DG; and (iii) various other program costs. Additionally, the 2019 DG requirement.ACC directed TEP to collaborate with the ACC to develop and file a proposal by July 1, 2022, to phase out the RES tariff.
Energy Efficiency Standards
Under the EE Standards, the ACC requires electric utilities to implement cost-effective programs to reduce customers' energy consumption. The EE Standards require increasing cumulative annual targeted retail kWh savings equal to 22% by 2020. As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP's cumulative annual energy savings was approximately 19%23%.
TEP is required to implement cost-effective DSM programs to comply with the ACC’s EE Standards. The EE Standards provide regulated utilities a DSM surcharge to recover from retail customers the costs to implement DSM programs, as well as an annual performance incentive. TEP records its annual DSM performance incentive for the prior calendar year is recorded in the first quarter of each year. TEP recorded $2 million in 2019, 2018, and 2017 related to performance in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In February 2019, the ACC approved TEP’s 2018 energy efficiency implementation plan with a budget of approximately $23 million, which is collected through the DSM surcharge.surcharge, and approved a waiver of the 2018 EE Standards. In addition, the ACC ordered that TEP's 2018 energy efficiency implementation plan be considered as its 2019 and 2020 energy efficiency implementation plans. In June 2021, TEP filed its 2022 energy efficiency implementation plan with a budget of approximately $23 million. TEP cannot predict the outcome of the proceeding.
Lost Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism
The LFCR mechanism provides for recovery of certain non-fuel costs that would go unrecovered between rate cases due to reduced retail kWh sales as a result of implementing ACC-approved energy efficiency programs and customer-installed DG. The LFCR mechanism is adjusted in each rate case when the ACC approves new base rates. In 2021, LFCR revenues decreased as a result of a rate adjustment as approved in the 2020 Rate Order. TEP records a regulatory asset and recognizes LFCR revenues when the amounts are verifiable regardless of when the lost retail kWh sales occur.occurred. TEP is required to make an annual filing with the ACC requesting recovery of LFCR revenues recognized in the prior year. The recovery is subject to a year-over-year increase cap of 2% of TEP's applicable retail revenues.
The table below summarizes the LFCR revenues recognized in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
LFCR Revenues$33
 $26
 $22
54


51

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Regulatory assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheet are summarized in the table below:
Remaining Recovery Period (years) December 31,Remaining Recovery Period (years)December 31,
($ in millions) 2019 2018($ in millions)20212020
Regulatory Assets    Regulatory Assets
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits (Note 10)Various $135
 $126
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits (Note 10)Various$128 $166 
Derivatives (Note 13)10 72
 27
Under Recovered Purchased Energy CostsUnder Recovered Purchased Energy Costs291 23 
Early Generation Retirement CostsVarious 68
 72
Early Generation Retirement CostsVarious38 43 
Lost Fixed Cost Recovery2 46
 35
Lost Fixed Cost Recovery137 59 
Property Tax Deferrals (1)
Property Tax Deferrals (1)
127 26 
Income Taxes Recoverable through Future Rates (1)(2)
Various 38
 47
Various17 27 
Under Recovered Purchased Energy Costs1 36
 
Property Tax Deferrals (2)
1 24
 23
Final Mine Reclamation and Retiree Healthcare Costs (3)
19 19
 29
Final Mine Reclamation and Retiree Healthcare Costs (3)
717 20 
Derivatives (Note 13)Derivatives (Note 13)855 
Springerville Unit 1 Leasehold Improvements (4)
4 9
 11
Springerville Unit 1 Leasehold Improvements (4)
2
Tax Expense Adjustor MechanismTax Expense Adjustor Mechanism1— 
Other Regulatory AssetsVarious 18
 30
Other Regulatory AssetsVarious14 16 
Total Regulatory Assets 465
 400
Total Regulatory Assets384 442 
Less Current Portion1 138
 107
Less Current Portion1116 124 
Total Non-Current Regulatory Assets $327
 $293
Total Non-Current Regulatory Assets$268 $318 
Regulatory LiabilitiesRegulatory Liabilities
Income Taxes Payable through Future Rates (2)
Income Taxes Payable through Future Rates (2)
Various$268 $298 
Net Cost of Removal (5)
Net Cost of Removal (5)
Various73 125 
Renewable Energy StandardRenewable Energy StandardVarious66 63 
Derivatives (Note 13)Derivatives (Note 13)819 
Transmission Revenue Subject to Refund—FERCTransmission Revenue Subject to Refund—FERC115 15 
Demand Side ManagementDemand Side Management112 
Regulatory Liabilities    
Income Taxes Payable through Future Rates (1)
Various $327
 $354
Net Cost of Removal (5)
Various 164
 171
Renewable Energy StandardVarious 59
 52
Deferred Investment Tax Credits (6)
Various 3
 7
Over Recovered Purchased Energy CostsVarious 
 17
Transmission Cost AdjustorTransmission Cost Adjustor1— 
Tax Expense Adjustor MechanismTax Expense Adjustor Mechanism1— 29 
Other Regulatory LiabilitiesVarious 20
 6
Other Regulatory LiabilitiesVarious
Total Regulatory Liabilities 573
 607
Total Regulatory Liabilities463 541 
Less Current Portion1 96
 95
Less Current Portion1111 151 
Total Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities $477
 $512
Total Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities$352 $390 
(1)Recorded as a regulatory asset based on historical ratemaking treatment allowing regulated utilities recovery of property taxes on a pay-as-you-go or cash basis. TEP records a liability to reflect the accrual for financial reporting purposes and an offsetting regulatory asset to reflect recovery for regulatory purposes. This asset is fully recovered in rates with a recovery period of approximately six months.
(1)
(2)Amortized over five years, 10 years, or the lives of the assets. See Note 1 and Note 14 for additional information regarding income taxes.
(3)Represents costs associated with TEP’s jointly-owned facilities at San Juan and Four Corners. TEP recognizes these costs at future value and is permitted to fully recover these costs on a pay-as-you-go basis through the PPFAC mechanism. Final mine reclamation costs are expected to be funded by TEP through 2028.
(4)Represents investments TEP made, which were previously recorded in Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to ensure that the facilities continued to provide safe, reliable service to TEP's customers. TEP received ACC authorization to recover leasehold improvement costs at Springerville Unit 1 over a 10-year period.
(5)Represents an estimate of the future cost of retirement, net of salvage value. These are amounts collected through revenue for transmission, distribution, generation, and general and intangible plant which are not yet expended. As a result of the 2020 Rate
Amortized over the life of the assets. See Note 14 for additional information regarding income taxes.
(2)
Recorded as a regulatory asset based on historical ratemaking treatment allowing regulated utilities recovery of property taxes on a pay-as-you-go or cash basis. TEP records a liability to reflect the accrual for financial reporting purposes and an offsetting regulatory asset to reflect recovery for regulatory purposes. This asset is fully recovered in rates with a recovery period of approximately six months.
(3)
Represents costs associated with TEP’s jointly-owned facilities at San Juan, Four Corners, and Navajo. TEP recognizes these costs at future value and is permitted to fully recover these costs on a pay-as-you-go basis through the PPFAC mechanism. The majority of final mine reclamation costs are expected to occur through 2038.
(4)
Represents investments TEP made, which were previously recorded in Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to ensure that the facilities continued to provide safe, reliable service to TEP's customers. TEP received ACC authorization to recover leasehold improvement costs at Springerville Unit 1 over a 10-year period.
(5)
Represents an estimate of the future cost of retirement, net of salvage value. These are amounts collected through revenue for transmission, distribution, generation plant, and general and intangible plant which are not yet expended.
(6)
Represents federal energy credits generated after 2011 that are amortized over the tax life of the underlying asset.

52
55


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Early Generation Retirement Costs
Navajo Generating Station
In 2017, the Navajo Nation approved a land lease extension allowingOrder, TEP transferred costs from Net Cost of Removal to Accumulated Depreciation and the co-owners of Navajo to continue operations through December 2019 and begin decommissioning activities thereafter. TEP and the co-owners of Navajo retired the generation station in November 2019, with related decommissioning activities continuing through 2054. TEP is currently recovering the capital and operating costs in base rates using a useful life of 2030 for Navajo. Due to the early retirement, TEP requested recovery of final retirement costs over a 10-year period in the 2019 Rate Case.
Sundt Generating Station
In 2018, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality approved TEP's air permit application. Under the project outlined in the application, TEP is placing in service 10 RICE units and was required to retire Sundt Units 1 and 2 in November 2019. TEP is currently recovering the capital and operating costs in base rates using useful lives of 2028 and 2030 for Sundt Units 1 and 2, respectively. Due to the early retirement, TEP requested recovery of final retirement costs over a 10-year period in the 2019 Rate Case.Amortization. See Note 3 for additional information onrelated to new depreciation rates approved as part of the RICE units.2020 Rate Order.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory assets are either being collected or are expected to be collected through Retail Rates. With the exception of Early Generation Retirement Costs, Income Taxes Recoverable through Future Rates, and Springerville Unit 1 Leasehold Improvements, TEP does not earn a return on regulatory assets. Regulatory liabilities represent items that TEP either expects to pay to customers through billing reductions in future periods or plans to use for the purpose for which they were collected from customers. With the exception of over-recovered PPFAC costs and Income Taxes Payable through Future Rates, TEP does not paypays a return on the majority of its regulatory liabilities.liability balances.
IMPACTS OF REGULATORY ACCOUNTING
If TEP determines that it no longer meets the criteria for continued application of regulatory accounting, TEP would be required to write off its regulatory assets and liabilities related to those operations not meeting the regulatory accounting requirements. Discontinuation of regulatory accounting could have a material impact on TEP's financial statements.

NOTE 3. UTILITY PLANT AND JOINTLY-OWNED FACILITIES
UTILITY PLANT
The following table shows Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets by major class:
Annual Depreciation Rate (3)
Average Remaining Life in Years (3)
December 31,
($ in millions)20212020
Plant in Service
Generation Plant3.11%18$3,753 $3,279 
Distribution Plant1.93%332,024 1,906 
Transmission Plant1.69%351,210 1,090 
General Plant6.01%7540 503 
Intangible Plant, Software Costs, and Other (1)
VariousVarious268 291 
Plant Held for Future Use
Total Plant in Service (2)
$7,798 $7,073 
 
Annual Depreciation Rate (3)
 
Average Remaining Life in Years (3)
 December 31,
($ in millions)  2019 2018
Plant in Service       
Generation Plant3.19% 20 $3,065
 $2,667
Transmission Plant1.69% 37 1,060
 1,010
Distribution Plant1.56% 31 1,784
 1,692
General Plant5.89% 20 477
 409
Intangible Plant, Software Costs, and Other (1)
Various Various 271
 239
Plant Held for Future Use  7
 3
Total Plant in Service (2)
    $6,664
 $6,020
(1)(1)Primarily represents computer software, which is amortized over three to five years for smaller application software and 10 years for large enterprise software and has an average remaining life of three years.
Primarily represents computer software. Unamortized computer software costs were $78 million and $73 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortized computer software costs were $26 million in 2019, $24 million in 2018, and $19 million in 2017. Computer software is being amortized over its expected useful life ranging from three to five years for smaller application software and average remaining life of three years for large enterprise software.
(2)
Includes plant acquisition adjustments of $(211) million and $(134) million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(3)
Based on the 2015 depreciation study available for the major classes of Plant in Service, effective March 1, 2017, as approved by the ACC as part of the 2017 TEP Rate Order. TEP implemented new depreciation rates for Transmission Plant, based on the 2018 depreciation study, effective August 1, 2019, as approved in the 2019 FERC Rate Case.

53

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(3)Based on the 2018 depreciation study available for the major classes of Plant in Service, effective January 1, 2021, as approved as part of the 2020 Rate Order. Transmission Plant depreciation rates are based on the 2018 depreciation study, effective August 1, 2019, as approved as part of the 2019 FERC Rate Case.

Generation Plant


Gila River Unit 2Oso Grande
In 2017,2019, TEP entered into a 20-year tolling PPA with SRPBTA to purchase and receive all 550develop Oso Grande. In May 2021, Oso Grande was placed in service, adding 250 MW of wind-powered electric generation, increasing TEP's total renewable nominal generation capacity, power,including PPAs and ancillary services from Gila Riverowned utility-scale generation, to over 700 MW. As of December 31, 2021, there was $444 million in costs related to Oso Grande in Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Springerville Common Facilities
In 2020, due to expiring leases, TEP purchased 32.2% in undivided interests in facilities at Springerville used in common with Springerville Unit 1 and Unit 2 which included(Springerville Common Facilities) at a three-year option tototal fixed purchase the unit. The Tolling PPA was accounted for as a finance lease. See Note 8 for additional information regarding TEP's leases. In December 2019, TEP completed its purchaseprice of Gila River Unit 2 for $165$68 million. The purchase increasedtransaction resulted in an increase in Plant in Service and Material and Supplies and decreaseda decrease in Utility Plant Under Finance Leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets asSheets.
As a condition of the purchase, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District (SRP), the owner of Springerville Unit 4, purchased a 14% undivided interest in the Springerville Common Facilities for $30 million in 2020. Also, Tri-State, the lessee of Springerville Unit 3, was obligated to either: (i) buy a 14% undivided interest in the facilities for
56


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
$30 million by December 31, 2019.2021; or (ii) continue to make payments to TEP for the use of these facilities. Tri-State did not exercise its purchase option and therefore will continue to make payments to TEP.
RICE Units
Under the air permit approved by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality, TEP placed ininto service 510 natural gas RICE units with a total nominal generation capacity of 188 MW in 2020. As of December 2019. As a result,31, 2021, there was $187 million related to the Sundt RICE units recorded in Plant in Service on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
TEP Depreciation Rates
As part of the 2020 Rate Order, effective January 2021, TEP reclassified $33 million from Regulatory and Other Liabilities—Regulatory Liabilities to Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization on the Consolidated Balance Sheets increased by $82 million. An additional 5 unitsto reflect the impact of the revised depreciation rates on estimated cost of removal.
Amortization of Intangible Plant
Intangible Plant primarily consists of computer software. Accumulated amortization of computer software costs were $169 million and $199 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amortization of computer software costs totaled $33 million in 2021, $29 million in 2020, and $26 million in 2019. Future estimated amortization costs for existing computer software are scheduled$26 million in 2022, $19 million in 2023, $12 million in 2024, $7 million in 2025, and $4 million in 2026.
Intangible Plant includes $(4) million in acquisition discounts not subject to be placedamortization as of December 31, 2021, and none in service in the first quarter of 2020. The 10 units have a planned total nominal generation capacity of 188 MW.
JOINTLY-OWNED FACILITIES
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP was a participant in the following jointly-owned generation facilities and transmission systems:
(in millions)Ownership Percentage Plant in Service Construction Work in Progress Accumulated Depreciation Net Book Value
San Juan Unit 150.0% $289
 $1
 $(193) $97
Four Corners Units 4 and 57.0% 175
 5
 (77) 103
Luna33.3% 57
 
 (1) 56
Gila River Unit 375.0% 200
 2
 (61) 141
Gila River Common Facilities43.8% 71
 
 (23) 48
Springerville Coal Handling Facilities83.0% 208
 
 (90) 118
Transmission FacilitiesVarious 545
 5
 (295) 255
Total  $1,545
 $13
 $(740) $818

($ in millions)Ownership PercentagePlant in ServiceConstruction Work in ProgressAccumulated DepreciationNet Book Value
San Juan Unit 150.0%$285 $$(269)$17 
Four Corners Units 4 and 57.0%188 (81)111 
Luna33.3%59 (3)57 
Gila River Unit 375.0%206 — (65)141 
Gila River Common Facilities43.8%75 (26)50 
Springerville Coal Handling Facilities83.0%209 — (95)114 
Springerville Common Facilities86.0%399 — (207)192 
Transmission FacilitiesVarious462 20 (229)253 
Total$1,883 $27 $(975)$935 
As participantsa participant in these jointly-owned facilities, TEP is responsible for its share of operating and capital costs for the above facilities.costs. The Company accounts for its share of operating expenses and utility plant costs related to these facilities using proportionate consolidation.
57


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The liability accrual of AROs is primarily related to generation and PV assets and is included in Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of ARO accruals on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Beginning of Period$96 $107 
Liabilities Incurred (1)
14 — 
Liabilities Settled (2)
(2)(5)
Regulatory Deferral/Accretion Expense
Revisions to the Present Value of Estimated Cash Flows (3)
27 (10)
End of Period$139 $96 
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$72
 $46
Liabilities Incurred
 10
Liabilities Settled (1)
(2) 
Regulatory Deferral/Accretion Expense2
 3
Revisions to the Present Value of Estimated Cash Flows (2)
35
 13
End of Period$107
 $72
(1)(1)Asset retirement obligation for Oso Grande, placed in service in May 2021.
Primarily related to the retirement of Navajo.
(2)
Primarily related to changes due to revised estimates of the timing of cash flows required to settle future liabilities of certain generation facilities.


(2)Primarily related to the retirement of Navajo.
54

(3)Primarily related to changes due to revised estimates of the timing of cash flows required to settle future liabilities of San Juan and changes in ownership of Springerville Common Facilities.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 4. REVENUE
TEP earns the majority of its revenues from the sale of power to retail and wholesale customers based on regulator-approved tariff rates. Most of the Company's contracts have a single performance obligation, the delivery of power. TEP has certain contracts with variable transaction pricing that require it to estimate the expected consideration.
DISAGGREGATION OF REVENUES
The following table presents the disaggregation of TEP’s Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income by type of service:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Retail$972
 $1,022
 $1,017
Wholesale247
 238
 152
Other Services124
 100
 103
Revenues from Contracts with Customers1,343
 1,360
 1,272
Alternative Revenues35
 28
 24
Other40
 45
 45
Total Operating Revenues$1,418
 $1,433
 $1,341

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Retail$1,088 $1,039 $972 
Wholesale278 190 247 
Other Services114 95 124 
Revenues from Contracts with Customers1,480 1,324 1,343 
Alternative Revenues12 48 35 
Other101 53 40 
Total Operating Revenues$1,593 $1,425 $1,418 
Retail Revenues
TEP’s tariff-based sales to residential, commercial, and industrial customers are regulated by the ACC and recognized when power is delivered at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange. Retail revenues include an estimate for unbilled revenues from service that has been provided but not billed by the end of an accounting period. At the end of the month, amounts of power delivered since the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding unbilled revenue is calculated using anticipated Retail Rates. Unbilled revenues are dependent upon a number of factors that require management’s judgment including estimates of retail sales, customer usage patterns, and pricing. Unbilled revenues primarily increase during the spring and summer months and decrease during the fall and winter months due to the seasonal fluctuations of TEP’s actual load. The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in billed and unbilled accounts receivable balances in the balance sheet.balances. See Note 5 for components of Accounts Receivable Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In December 2020, the ACC issued a rate order for new rates that took effect January 1, 2021. See Note 2 for more information regarding the 2020 Rate Order.
58


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Wholesale Revenues
TEP’s operations include the wholesale marketing of electricity and transmission to other utilities and power marketers, which may include capacity, power, transmission, and ancillary services. When TEP promises to provide distinct services within a contract, the Company identifies one or more performance obligations. The Company recognizes revenue for wholesale and transmission sales at FERC-approved rates based on demand (for capacity) or the reading of meters (for power). For contracts with multiple performance obligations, all deliverables are eligible for recognition in the month of production; therefore, it is not necessary to allocate the transaction price among the identified performance obligations. For purchased power and wholesale sales contracts that are settled financially, TEP nets the purchased power contracts with the sales contracts and reflects the amount in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In May 2019, TEP filedPursuant to a proposal with the FERC requesting revisions to its OATT. The filing proposed replacingorder, all rates charged under TEP's stated transmission rates with a forward-looking formula rate. Effective August 2019, the FERC authorized TEP to bill the proposed rate revisions, subject to refund. TEP began to recognize a provision for revenuesrevised OATT are subject to refund foruntil the 2019 FERC Rate Case proceedings conclude. Wholesale Revenues exclude an estimate of revenues that are probable forof refund. See Note 2 for more information regarding the 2019 FERC rate case.Rate Case.
Other Services Revenues
Other Services Revenues primarily include fees earned as operator of Springerville Units 3 and 4, miscellaneous service-related revenues, and reimbursement of various operating expenses for the use of the Springerville Common Facilities by Springerville Units 3 and 4 and the Springerville Coal Handling Facilities by the operator of Springerville Unit 3. When TEP recognizes revenue for reimbursement of Springerville Common Facilities and Springerville Coal Handling Facilities' operating expenses, the associated expenses are recorded in their respective line items inon the income statement based on the nature of services provided.

55

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Alternative Revenues
Alternative revenue programs allow utilities to adjust future rates in response to past activities or completed events if certain criteria established by a regulator are met. TEP has identified its LFCR, mechanismTCA, and ECA mechanisms and DSM performance incentive as alternative revenues. The LFCR mechanism provides for recovery of certain non-fuel costs that would go unrecovered due to reduced retail kWh sales as a result of implementing ACC-approved energy efficiency programs and customer-installed DG. The LFCR surcharge is assessed as a percentage of the customer’s bill. Revenue recognition related to the LFCR mechanism creates a regulatory asset until such time as the revenue is collected. For recovery of the LFCR regulatory asset, TEP is required to file an annual LFCR adjustment request with the ACC for the LFCR revenues recognized in the prior year. The recovery is subject to a year-over-year cap of applicable retail revenues of 2%. In addition, the ACC approves a new DSM surcharge annually, which is effective June 1 of each year, to compensate TEP for the costs to design and implement cost-effective energy efficiency and demand response programs until such costs are reflected in TEP’s non-fuel base rates as well as a performance incentive. TEP collects the DSM surcharge on a per kWh basis for residential customers and on a percentage of bill basis for non-residential customers. See Note 2 for additional information regarding these cost recovery mechanisms.mechanisms and performance incentive.
Other Revenues
Other Revenues include gains and losses on derivative contracts, latecommon cost allocations to affiliates, and returned payment finance charges,asset management agreement service fees and lease income.optimization gains. See Note 6 for information regarding revenue from related parties and Note 13 for information regarding derivative instruments and Note 8 for information regarding lease income.instruments.

NOTE 5. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The following table presents the components of Accounts Receivable Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Retail$78 $90 
Retail, Unbilled44 41 
Retail, Allowance for Credit Losses(10)(13)
Wholesale (1)
47 33 
Due from Affiliates (Note 6)17 
Other17 13 
Accounts Receivable$193 $173 
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Customer (1)
$92
 $99
Customer, Unbilled42
 45
Due from Affiliates (Note 6)8
 8
Other19
 25
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts(6) (5)
Accounts Receivable, Net$155
 $172
(1)(1)Includes $16 millionand $7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of receivables related to revenue from derivative instruments.
Includes $5 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of receivables related to revenue from derivative instruments.


56
59


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
TEP separately evaluates retail, wholesale, and other accounts receivable for credit losses and has not recorded an allowance for credit losses for non-retail accounts receivable. The allowance is estimated based on historical collection patterns, sales, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The following table presents the change in the balance of Retail, Allowance for Credit Losses included in Accounts Receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Beginning of Period$(13)$(6)
Credit Loss Expense— (10)
Write-offs
End of Period$(10)$(13)
Service Disconnection Moratoriums
In 2019, the ACC enacted emergency rules that suspended service disconnections and late fees for electric residential customers who would have otherwise been eligible for service disconnection during the period from June 1 through October 15 (Summer Moratorium). The Summer Moratorium remained in effect for 2020 and 2021, and was permanently adopted by the ACC in November 2021. In addition, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, TEP voluntarily suspended service disconnections and late fees from March 2020 through January 2021 for all customers who would have otherwise been eligible for disconnection.
In December 2020, the ACC enacted a bill credit and payment program for residential customers who are behind on their electric bills as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. For qualifying customers the program included: (i) an upfront bill credit applied to their December 2020 bill; and (ii) automatic enrollment into an eight-month payment plan. TEP also voluntarily created payment arrangements for commercial customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the second quarter of 2021, TEP began experiencing accounts receivable collection activity consistent with pre-COVID-19 pandemic conditions and has made significant progress towards collecting aged accounts receivable from these customers.
TEP is continuing to monitor collection activity and adjusting its allowance for credit losses as needed.

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
TEP engages in various transactions with Fortis, UNS Energy, and the UNS Energy Affiliates. These transactions include: (i) the sale and purchase of power and transmission services; (ii) common cost allocations; and (iii) the provision of corporate and other labor-related services. Effective January 2021, TEP hired SES's employees and will no longer utilize SES's services.
The following table presents the components of related party balances included in Accounts Receivable Net and Accounts Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Receivables from Related Parties
UNS Electric$$
UNS Energy
UNS Gas
Total Due from Related Parties$17 $
Payables to Related Parties
UNS Energy$$
UNS Gas— 
SES— 
Total Due to Related Parties$$
60


 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Receivables from Related Parties   
UNS Electric$6
 $7
UNS Gas2
 1
Total Due from Related Parties$8
 $8
    
Payables to Related Parties   
SES$2
 $2
UNS Electric1
 1
UNS Gas
 1
UNS Energy1
 1
Total Due to Related Parties$4
 $5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the components of related party transactions included in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Goods and Services Provided by TEP to Affiliates
Transmission Revenues, UNS Electric (1)
$11 $$
Wholesale Revenues, UNS Electric (1)(2)
25 
Control Area Services, UNS Electric (3)
Common Costs, UNS Energy Affiliates (4)
21 19 19 
Goods and Services Provided by Affiliates to TEP
Wholesale Revenues, UNS Electric (1)
— — 
Supplemental Workforce, SES (5)
— 14 15 
Corporate Services, UNS Energy (6)
Corporate Services, UNS Energy Affiliates (7)
Capacity Charges, UNS Gas (8)
— — 
Corporate Services, Fortis Affiliates (9)
— — 
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Goods and Services Provided by TEP to Affiliates     
Transmission Revenues, UNS Electric (1) 
$7
 $6
 $7
Wholesale Revenues, UNS Electric (1)
1
 1
 
Control Area Services, UNS Electric (2)
4
 3
 3
Common Costs, UNS Energy Affiliates (3)
19
 18
 16
Corporate Services, Fortis Affiliates (4)

 
 2
      
Goods and Services Provided by Affiliates to TEP     
Supplemental Workforce, SES (5)
15
 15
 15
Corporate Services, UNS Energy (6)
6
 6
 5
Corporate Services, UNS Energy Affiliates (7)
4
 7
 5
Capacity Charges, UNS Gas (8)
1
 1
 
(1)(1)TEP and UNS Electric sell power and transmission services to each other. Wholesale power is sold at prevailing market prices, while transmission services are sold at FERC-approved rates through the applicable OATT.
TEP and UNS Electric sell power and transmission services to each other. Wholesale power is sold at prevailing market prices, while transmission services are sold at FERC-approved rates through the applicable OATT.
(2)
TEP charges UNS Electric for control area services under a FERC-approved Control Area Services Agreement.
(3)
Common costs (information systems, facilities, etc.) are allocated on a cost-causative basis and recorded as revenue by TEP. The method of allocation is deemed reasonable by management and is reviewed by the ACC as part of the rate case process.
(4)
TEP provides non-tariffed goods and services to Fortis affiliate companies at the higher of fully burdened cost or fair market value.
(5)
SES provides supplemental workforce and meter-reading services to TEP based on related party service agreements. The charges are based on cost of services performed and deemed reasonable by management.
(6)
Costs for corporate services at UNS Energy are allocated to its subsidiaries using the Massachusetts Formula, an industry accepted method of allocating common costs to affiliated entities. TEP's allocation is approximately 83% of UNS Energy's allocated costs.

57

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)(3)TEP charges UNS Electric for control area services under a FERC-approved Control Area Services Agreement.

(4)Common costs (information systems, facilities, etc.) are allocated on a cost-causative basis and recorded as revenue by TEP. The method of allocation is deemed reasonable by management and is reviewed by the ACC as part of the rate case process.

(5)SES provided supplemental workforce and meter-reading services to TEP based on related party service agreements. The charges were based on cost of services performed and deemed reasonable by management.

(6)Costs for corporate services at UNS Energy are allocated to its subsidiaries using the Massachusetts Formula, an industry accepted method of allocating common costs to affiliated entities. TEP's allocation is approximately 85% of UNS Energy's allocated costs. Corporate Services, UNS Energy includes legal, audit, and Fortis' management fees. TEP's share of Fortis' management fees werewas $6 million in 2019, $5 million in 2018,2021, 2020, and $6 million in 2017.
(7)2019.
Costs for corporate services (e.g., finance, accounting, tax, legal, and information technology) and other labor services for UNS Energy Affiliates are directly assigned to the benefiting entity at a fully burdened cost when possible.
(8)
UNS Gas charges TEP for natural gas capacity used to supply 1 of TEP's generation facilities.
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PARENT
In January 2020, an equity contribution(7)Costs for corporate services (e.g., finance, accounting, tax, legal, and information technology) and other labor services for UNS Energy Affiliates are directly assigned to the benefiting entity at a fully burdened cost when possible.
(8)UNS Gas charges TEP for natural gas capacity used to supply 1 of $125 million was receivedTEP's generation facilities.
(9)Fortis charges TEP for its share of payroll tax, insurance, and other costs paid by TEP from UNS Energy.Fortis for affiliated employees.

61


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 7. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS
DEBT
Long-term debt matures more than one year from the date of the financial statements.debt issuance. The following table presents the components of long-term debt, which includes Long-Term Debt, Net and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt, Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
December 31,
($ in millions)Interest RateMaturity Date20212020
Notes
2011 Senior Notes5.15%2021$— $250 
2012 Senior Notes (1)
3.85%2023150 150 
2014 Senior Notes5.00%2044150 150 
2015 Senior Notes3.05%2025300 300 
2018 Senior Notes4.85%2048300 300 
2020 Senior Notes4.00%2050350 350 
2020 Senior Notes1.50%2030300 300 
2021 Senior Notes3.25%2051325 — 
Tax-Exempt Local Furnishings Bonds (2)
2012 Pima A4.50%203016 16 
2013 Pima A4.00%202991 91 
Tax-Exempt Pollution Control Bonds
2012 Apache A (3)
4.50%2030177 177 
Total Long-Term Debt (4)
2,159 2,084 
Less Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs24 20 
Less Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt— 250 
Total Long-Term Debt, Net$2,135 $1,814 
     December 31,
($ in millions)Interest Rate Maturity Date 2019 2018
Notes       
2011 Notes5.15% 2021 $250
 $250
2012 Notes3.85% 2023 150
 150
2014 Notes5.00% 2044 150
 150
2015 Notes3.05% 2025 300
 300
2018 Notes4.85% 2048 300
 300
Tax-Exempt Local Furnishings Bonds (1)
       
2010 Pima A5.25% 2040 100
 100
2012 Pima A4.50% 2030 16
 16
2013 Pima A4.00% 2029 91
 91
Tax-Exempt Pollution Control Bonds (2)
       
2009 Pima A4.95% 2020 80
 80
2009 Coconino A5.13% 2032 
 15
2012 Apache A4.50% 2030 177
 177
Total Long-Term Debt (3)
    1,614
 1,629
Less Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs    12
 14
Less Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt    80
 
Total Long-Term Debt, Net    $1,522
 $1,615

(1)
The 2012 Senior Notes are callable prior to December 15, 2022, with a make-whole premium plus accrued interest. After December 15, 2022, the notes are callable at par plus accrued interest.
(1)
The 2010 Pima A bonds can be redeemed at par on or after October 2020. TEP has the option to redeem the remaining bonds at par on dates ranging from first quarter of 2022 to first quarter of 2023.
(2)
The 2009 Pima A bonds mature in October 2020. The 2012 Apache A bonds may be redeemed at par in the first quarter of 2022.
(3)
As of December 31, 2019, all of TEP's debt is unsecured.
(2)The 2012 Pima A bonds become callable at par on or after June 1, 2022. The 2013 Pima A bonds become callable at par on or after March 1, 2023.
(3)The 2012 Apache A bonds become callable at par on or after March 1, 2022.
(4)As of December 31, 2021, all of TEP's debt is unsecured.
Debt Issuances and Redemptions
Fixed Rate Debt
In November 2019,August 2021, TEP redeemed at par $250 million aggregate principal amount of 5.15% senior unsecured notes, prior to maturity.
In May 2021, TEP issued and sold $325 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior unsecured notes due May 2051. TEP may redeem the notes prior to November 1, 2050, with a make-whole premium plus accrued interest. On or after November 1, 2050, TEP may redeem the debt at par plus accrued interest. TEP used the net proceeds to redeem debt in August 2021 and for general corporate purposes.
In September 2020, TEP extinguished its obligations on two series of fixed rate tax-exempt bonds with an aggregate principal amount of $15amounts of: (i) $80 million, prior towhich matured on October 1, 2020; and (ii) $100 million redeemed at par on October 1, 2020, the maturity of the bonds.

58

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



first par call date.
In November 2018,August 2020, TEP issued and sold $300 million aggregate principal amount of 1.50% senior unsecured notes. TEP may redeem the notes due August 2030. The debt is callable prior to JuneMay 1, 2048,2030, with a make-whole premium plus accrued interest. On or after JuneAfter May 1, 2048, TEP may redeem2030, the notesdebt becomes callable at par plus accrued interest. An amount equal to the net proceeds was allocated to the total costs of Oso Grande.
Variable Rate Debt
62


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2018,April 2020, TEP redeemed at par a series of variable rate tax-exempt bonds with anissued and sold $350 million aggregate principal amount of $37 million4.00% senior unsecured notes due June 2050. The debt is callable prior to December 15, 2049, with a make-whole premium plus accrued interest. After December 15, 2049, the maturity of the bonds. The bonds were backed by an LOC issued pursuant to the 2010 Reimbursement Agreement which expired in February 2019. In connection with the redemption of the related bonds, the $37 million LOC and the associated 2010 Reimbursement Agreement were terminated.
In November 2018, TEP redeemeddebt becomes callable at par a series of variable rate tax-exempt bonds with an aggregate principal amount of $100plus accrued interest. TEP used the net proceeds from the sale: (i) to repay amounts outstanding under its credit agreement; (ii) to repay and terminate $225 million prior to the maturity of the bonds. The bonds were subject to mandatory tenderin term loans; and (iii) for purchase in November 2018.general corporate purposes.
Maturities
Long-term debt matures on the following dates:
(in millions)
Long-Term Debt (1)
2022$— 
2023150 
2024— 
2025300 
2026— 
Thereafter1,709 
Total$2,159 
(in millions)
Long-Term Debt (1)
2020$80
2021250
2022
2023150
2024
Thereafter1,134
Total$1,614
(1)(1)Total long-term debt excludes $16 million of related unamortized debt issuance costs and $8 million of unamortized original issue discount.
Total long-term debt excludes $10 million of related unamortized debt issuance costs and $2 million of unamortized original issue discount.
CREDIT AGREEMENTS
Amounts borrowed under credit agreements are recorded in Borrowings Under Credit Agreements on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
2019 Credit AgreementAGREEMENT
In December 2019,October 2021, TEP entered into an unsecured credit agreement with a maturity date of December 2020 that provides for term loans. Terms are as follows:
       Weighted Average Interest Rate   
 Capacity 
Borrowed (1)
 Available  Pricing
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Term Loan$225
 $165
 $60
 4.75% LIBOR + 0.550%or ABR + 0.00%
(1)
All amounts borrowed will be due and payable by December 2020.
The 2019 Credit Agreement is intended to supplement TEP's liquidity during a period of increased capital spending and to provide funds: (i) to complete the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 Generating Station; (ii) to make payments for the construction of the Oso Grande project; and (iii) for other general corporate purposes. Amounts paid or repaid may not be reborrowed. As of February 12, 2020, 0 amount was available as the term loan had been fully drawn. See Note 3 and Note 9 for additional information on the purchase of Gila River Unit 2 and Oso Grande, respectively.

59

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



2015 Credit Agreement
In October 2015, TEP entered into an unsecured credit agreement with a maturity date of October 2022 that provides for revolving credit commitments with swingline and LOC facilities. Termssublimits, due in October 2026, the termination date (2021 Credit Agreement). The final maturity date is subject to 2 one-year extensions if certain conditions are as follows:satisfied. The 2021 Credit Agreement amended and restated in its entirety the 2015 Credit Agreement.
 Capacity Sub-Limit LOC Borrowed Available Weighted Average Interest Rate 
Pricing (1)
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Revolver and LOC$250
 $50
 $
 $250
 % LIBOR + 1.000%or ABR + 0.00%
(in millions)December 31, 2018
Revolver and LOC$250
 $50
 $
 $250
 % LIBOR + 1.000%or ABR + 0.00%
(1)
Interest rates and fees are based on a pricing grid tied to TEP's credit rating.
Amounts borrowed under the 20152021 Credit Agreement will beare used for working capital and other general corporate purposes.purposes and are recorded in Borrowings Under Credit Agreement on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest rates and fees are based on a pricing grid tied to TEP's credit rating. LOCs will beare issued from time to time to support energy procurement, hedging transactions, and other business activities. The credit agreement provides for transitions to alternative benchmark rates. Terms are as follows:
Sub-Limit Swingline(1)
Sub-Limit LOCWeighted Average Interest Rate
Capacity
Borrowed(2)
Available
Pricing(3)
($ in millions)December 31, 2021
2021 Agreement$250 $15 $50 $25 $225 2.53 %LIBOR + 1.000%or ABR + 0.00%
In(1)ABR pricing would apply to swingline loans.
(2)Includes a $10 million LOC at a rate of 1.00% per annum issued in October 2021 to replace LOCs originally issued in January 2020 TEP delivered $12 million in LOCs pursuant to TEP taking ownership of Oso Grande under the build-transfer agreement. BTA.
(3)TEP's pricing may be adjusted based on performance measured using two key performance indicators: (i) the three-year average Occupational Safety and Health Administration total recordable incident rate, excluding solely COVID-19 pandemic-related incidents; and (ii) capacity targets for owned plus firm purchased power agreement renewable generation, including energy storage.
Sub-Limit LOCWeighted Average Interest Rate
Capacity
Borrowed(1)
AvailablePricing
($ in millions)December 31, 2020
2015 Agreement$250 $50 $12 $238 — %LIBOR + 1.000%or ABR + 0.00%
(1)Included $12 million in LOCs at a rate of 1.00% per annum issued in January 2020 pursuant to TEP taking ownership of Oso Grande under the BTA.
As of February 12, 2020,10, 2022, there was $173$220 million available under the revolving credit commitments and LOC facilities.2021 Credit Agreement.

63


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 8. LEASES
TEP’s leases are included on the balance sheet as follows:
December 31,
(in millions)Lease Type20212020
Lease Assets
Regulatory and Other Assets, OtherOperating$$
Lease Liabilities
Current Liabilities, OtherOperating
Regulatory and Other Liabilities, OtherOperating
OPERATING LEASES
TEP leases an interest in Springerville Common Facilities,office facilities, land, rail cars, and communication tower space with remaining terms of one to 22 years.20 years. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that may extend a lease term for up to 15 years.10 years. Certain lease agreements include rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation or require TEP to pay real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance, or other operating expenses associated with the lease premises.
TEP’s leases are included in the balance sheet as follows:
(in millions)Lease Type December 31, 2019
Lease Assets   
Utility Plant Under Finance LeasesFinance $151
Accumulated Amortization of Finance Lease AssetsFinance (77)
Regulatory and Other Assets, OtherOperating 8
Lease Liabilities   
Current Liabilities, Finance Lease ObligationsFinance 17
Finance Lease ObligationsFinance 67
Current Liabilities, OtherOperating 1
Regulatory and Other Liabilities, OtherOperating 6

Springerville Common Facilities Leases
TEP finances a portion of the Springerville Common Facilities with finance leases. In December 2019, TEP elected to purchase a 32.2% undivided interest in the Springerville Common Facilities by January 2021 for $68 million. The lease assets are amortized over the estimated life of the underlying plant because ownership of the plant transfers at the end of the lease term. In addition, TEP has agreements with Tri-State, the lessee of Springerville Unit 3, and SRP, the owner of Springerville Unit 4, that contain the following conditions should TEP complete the purchase of the Springerville Common Facilities: (i) SRP will be obligated to buy a 14% undivided interest in the facilities; and (ii) Tri-State will be obligated to either: (a) buy a 14% undivided interest in the facilities; or (b) continue to make payments to TEP for the use of these facilities.
Gila River Unit 2
In May 2018, TEP recorded an increase to finance lease assets and obligations related to a 20-year Tolling PPA with SRP, entered into in 2017, to purchase and receive all 550 MW of capacity, power, and ancillary services from Gila River Unit 2. The

60

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Tolling PPA included a three-year option to purchase the unit. TEP exercised its option and subsequently purchased Gila River Unit 2 in December 2019 at which time the lease asset and obligation were removed.LEASE COST
The following table presents the components of TEP’s lease cost:costs:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Finance
Amortization of Leased Assets (1)(2)
$— $10 $13 
Interest on Lease Liabilities (3)
— 13 
Operating
Variable (4)
16 
Short Term
Total Lease Cost$$16 $44 
 Year Ended
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Finance 
Amortization of Leased Assets (1)
$13
Interest on Lease Liabilities (2)
13
Operating1
Variable16
Short Term1
Total Lease Cost$44
(1)
TEP deferred $6 million in amortization related to Gila River Unit 2 in Regulatory and Other Assets—Regulatory Assets based on PPFAC recovery of TEP's fixed capacity payment.
(2)
Finance lease interest expense is recorded in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. In 2018, lease interest expense related to Gila River Unit 2 was recorded in Purchased Power on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Finance lease interest expense related to Gila River Unit 2 was $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. TEP purchased Gila River Unit 2 in December 2019.
(1)Finance lease amortization is recorded in Depreciation on the Consolidated Statements of Income. In 2020, TEP hasdeferred $2 million of amortization related to the Springerville Common Facilities in Regulatory and Other Assets—Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on recovery over the expected life of the asset. See Note 3 for additional information about TEP's purchase of Springerville Common Facilities.
(2)TEP entered into a 20-yeartolling PPA to purchase and receive capacity, power, and ancillary services from Gila River Unit 2, which was accounted for as a finance lease. In 2019, TEP deferred $6 million of amortization in Regulatory and Other Assets—Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on PPFAC recovery of TEP's fixed capacity payment. TEP purchased Gila River Unit 2 in December 2019.
(3)In 2020, TEP deferred $1 million of lease for energyinterest expense related to the Springerville Common Facilities in Regulatory and Other Assets —Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on recovery over the expected life of the asset. Finance lease interest expense related to Gila River Unit 2 was $12 million in 2019.
(4)Variable lease cost is primarily comprised of battery storage with variable payments contingent on performance, which is expected to commenceperformance. In April 2021, a 20-year renewable PPA, accompanied by the fourth quarterbattery storage, achieved commercial operation. See Note 9 for additional information about TEP's renewable PPAs.
64


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
MATURITY ANALYSIS OF LEASE LIABILITIES
As of December 31, 2019, TEP had the following2021, TEP's future minimum lease payments, excluding payments to lessors for variable costs:costs, follow:
(in millions)Operating Leases
2022$
2023
2024
2025
2026
Thereafter
Total Lease Payments
Less Imputed Interest
Total Lease Obligations
Less Current Portion
Total Non-Current Lease Obligations$
(in millions)Finance Leases Operating Leases Total
2020$18
 $1
 $19
202168
 1
 69
2022
 1
 1
2023
 1
 1
2024
 1
 1
Thereafter
 4
 4
Total Lease Payments86
 9
 95
Less Imputed Interest2
 2
 4
Total Lease Obligations84
 7
 91
Less Current Portion17
 1
 18
Total Non-Current Lease Obligations$67
 $6
 $73

LEASE TERMS AND DISCOUNT RATES
The following table presents TEP's lease terms and discount raterates related to its leases:
December 31, 2019
Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Term (years)
Finance Leases1
Operating Leases12
Weighted-Average Discount Rate
Finance Leases2.2%
Operating Leases4.1%

December 31,
20212020
Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Term (years)
Operating Leases1111
Weighted-Average Discount Rate
Operating Leases3.9 %3.9 %

61

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



LEASE CASH FLOWS
The following table presents TEP's cash flow information related to its leases:paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
 Year Ended
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Cash Paid for Amounts Included in the Measurement of Lease Liabilities 
Operating Cash Flows used for Finance Leases$13
Operating Cash Flows used for Operating Leases1
Financing Cash Flows used for Finance Leases11
Investing Cash Flows used for Finance Leases164

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Operating Cash Flows used for Finance Leases$— $$13 
Operating Cash Flows used for Operating Leases
Financing Cash Flows used for Finance Leases— 17 11 
Investing Cash Flows used for Finance Leases— 68 164 
See Note 12 for non-cash transactions that resulted in recognition of right-of-use assets in exchange for lease liabilities.
In addition, LEASE INCOME
TEP leases limited office facilities and utility property to others with remaining terms of fourtwo to thirteen21 years. Most leases include 1 or more options to renew with renewal terms that may extend a lease term for up to three years.
OperatingTEP's operating lease income forwas $1 million in each of 2021, 2020, and 2019, included in Other, Net on the year ended December 31, 2019, was $1 million.Consolidated Statements of Income. TEP's expected operating lease payments to be received as of December 31, 2019,2021, are $1 million or less in each of 2020year from 2022 through 20242026 and $2 million thereafter.
DISCLOSURES RELATED TO PERIODS PRIOR TO ADOPTION OF THE NEW LEASE STANDARD
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments were as follows:
(in millions)Capital Leases Operating Leases
2019$187
 $1
202020
 1
2021
 1
2022
 1
2023
 1
Thereafter
 5
Total Lease Payments207
 $10
Less: Imputed Interest14
  
Total Lease Obligations193
  
Less: Current Portion173
  
Total Non-Current Lease Obligations$20
  

TEP's operating lease cost was $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
65
See Note 12 for non-cash transactions that resulted in recognition of right-of-use assets in exchange for lease liabilities.


62

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had the following unconditional minimum purchase obligations:commitments:
(in millions)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total(in millions)20222023202420252026ThereafterTotal
Minimum Purchase CommitmentsMinimum Purchase Commitments
Fuel, Including Transportation$94
 $61
 $40
 $33
 $33
 $194
 $455
Fuel, Including Transportation$83 $74 $36 $28 $25 $144 $390 
Purchased Power8
 
 
 
 
 
 8
Purchased Power47 47 — — — — 94 
Transmission21
 16
 14
 3
 3
 6
 63
Transmission31 20 15 13 88 
Purchase CommitmentsPurchase Commitments
Renewable Power Purchase Agreements63
 63
 63
 63
 62
 543
 857
Renewable Power Purchase Agreements80 80 79 79 79 847 1,244 
RES Performance-Based Incentives8
 7
 7
 7
 7
 33
 69
RES Performance-Based Incentives23 54 
Land Easements and Rights-of-Way (1)
1
 2
 1
 1
 3
 79
 87
Total Purchase Commitments$195
 $149
 $125
 $107
 $108
 $855
 $1,539
Total CommitmentsTotal Commitments$248 $228 $137 $125 $114 $1,018 $1,870 

(1)
Land easements and rights-of-way have varying terms and provisions and reflect expiration dates through 2054.
Costs for Purchased Power, Transmission, and Fuel, Including Transportation, are recoverable from customers through the PPFAC mechanism. A portion of the costs of renewable PPAs are recoverable through the PPFAC, with the balance of costs recoverable through the RES tariff. PBI costs are recoverable through the RES tariff. See Note 2 for information on ACC approved cost recovery mechanisms.
Minimum Purchase Commitments
Fuel, Including Transportation
TEP has long-term agreements for the purchase and delivery of coal with various expiration dates between 20202022 and 2031. Amounts paid under these contracts depend on actual quantities purchased and delivered. Some of these agreements include price adjustment components that will affect future costs.
In 2021, TEP entered into natural gas commodity purchase agreements at market prices that expire through the fourth quarter of 2023. The commitment amounts included in the table above are based on projected market prices as of December 31, 2021.
TEP has firm transportation agreements with capacity sufficient to meet its load requirements. These agreements expire in various years between 2022 and 2040.
Purchased Power
In 2021, TEP has contractsentered into tolling PPAs to purchase and receive up to 300 MW of capacity, power, and ancillary services from June 15 through October 15 in 2022 and 2023. TEP will pay monthly capacity charges and variable power charges.
In 2021, TEP also entered into tolling PPAs with utilitiesUNS Electric to sell and other energy suppliersdeliver up to 150 MW of capacity, power, and ancillary services over the same periods. UNS Electric will pay TEP monthly capacity charges equal to 50% of TEP's monthly capacity charges and variable power charges. TEP's commitment does not reflect any reduction for purchased power to: (i) meet system load and energy requirements; (ii) replace generation from company-owned units under maintenance and during outages; and (iii) meet operating reserve obligations. In general, these contracts provide for capacity and energy payments based on actual power taken under the contracts with various expiration dates through the second quartersubsequent sale of 2020. Certain of these contracts are at a fixed price per MW and others are indexed to natural gas prices. The commitment amounts included in the table above are based on projected market prices as of December 31, 2019.capacity.
Transmission
TEP has agreements with other utilitieslong-term firm point-to-point contracts to purchase transmission services over lines that are part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the United States. These agreements expire in various years between 20202022 and 2030.
Purchase Commitments
Renewable Power Purchase Agreements
TEP enters into long-term renewable PPAs, which require TEP to purchase 100% of certain renewable energy generation facilitiesfacilities' output and RECs associated with the output delivered once commercial operation status is achieved. In 2021, two PPA facilities and the associated battery storage achieved commercial operation. The PPAs expire in April 2041 and December 2051. While TEP is not required to make payments under the agreements if power is not delivered, estimated future payments are included in the table above. These agreements expire in various years between 2027 and 2036.2051.
66


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
RES Performance-Based Incentives
TEP has entered into REC purchase agreements to purchase the environmental attributes from retail customers with solar installations. Payments for the RECs are termed PBIs and are paid in contractually agreed-upon intervals (usually quarterly) based on metered renewable energy production. These agreements expire in various years between 20202022 and 2034.

63

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Build-Transfer Agreement
In March 2019, TEP entered into a build-transfer agreement to develop a 250 MW nominal capacity wind-powered electric generation facility, which is under construction in southeastern New Mexico (Oso Grande) with estimated costs of approximately $384 million. In January 2020, TEP took ownership of Oso Grande. Construction commenced in the third quarter of 2019 and is expected to be completed for operation by December 2020. TEP made payments under the build-transfer agreement of $47 million in 2019 and $226 million in January 2020.
CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
TEP is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. TEP believes such normal and routine litigation will not have a material impact on its operations or consolidated financial results. TEP is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties, and other costs in substantial amounts on TEP and are disclosed below.
Claims Related to San Juan Generating Station
WildEarth Guardians
In 2013, WildEarth Guardians (WEG) filed a Petition for Review in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) challenging several unrelated mining plan modification approvals, including two issued in 2008 related to Westmoreland San Juan Mining LLC's (as successor to SJCC) existing San Juan Mine. The petition alleges various National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) violations against the OSMRE, including: (i) failure to provide requisite public notice and participation; and (ii) failure to analyze certain environmental impacts. WEG’s petition seeks various forms of relief, including voiding and remanding the various mining modification approvals, enjoining the federal defendants from re-issuing the approvals until they can demonstrate compliance with the NEPA, and enjoining operations at the affected mines.SJCC intervened in this matter and was granted its motion tosever its claims from the lawsuit and transfer venue to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, where this matter is now pending. In July 2016, the federal defendants filed a motion asking that the matter be voluntarily remanded to the OSMRE so the OSMRE may prepare a new Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the NEPA regarding the impacts of the San Juan Mine mining plan approval. In August 2016, the court issued an order granting the motion for remand to conduct further environmental analysis and complete an EIS by August 2019. The order provides that: (i) the OSMRE’s decision approving the mining plan will remain in effect during this process; or (ii) if the EIS is not completed by August 2019, then the approved mine plan will immediately be vacated, absent further court order.On April 30, 2019, the OSMRE issued a final Record of Decision (ROD) on the Final EIS released March 15, 2019. The Final EIS contemplates continued mining at the San Juan Mine in annual quantities similar to those currently being provided through 2033. The Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management approved the mining plan outlined in the ROD in August 2019. TEP is not a party in this matter but does own 50% of Unit 1 at San Juan. San Juan is scheduled for early retirement in 2022. TEP does not anticipate any significant impact on the cost of coal at San Juan related to this matter.
Mine Reclamation at Generation Facilities Not Operated by TEP
TEP pays ongoing mine reclamation costs related to coal mines that supply generation facilities in which TEP has an ownership interest but does not operate. Amounts recorded for final mine reclamation are subject to various assumptions, such as estimations of reclamation costs, timing of when final reclamation will occur, and the expected inflation rate.As these assumptions change, TEP will prospectively adjustadjusts the expense amounts for final reclamation over the remaining coal supply agreements’ terms. TEP’s PPFAC allows the Company to pass through final mine reclamation costs, as a component of fuel costs, to retail customers. Therefore, TEP defers these expenses until recovered from rate payerscustomers by increasing the regulatory asset and the reclamation liability over the remaining life of the coal supply agreements and recovers the regulatory asset through the PPFAC as final mine reclamation costs are paid out.
San Juan and Four Cornersfunded.
TEP is liable for a portion of final mine reclamation costs upon closure of the mines servicing San Juan and Four Corners. TEP’s estimated share of final mine reclamation costs at both mines is $57$44 million upon expiration of the related coal supply agreements, which expire in 2022 and 2031, respectively. An aggregate liability balance related to San Juan and Four Corners final mine reclamation of $36 million and $31$40 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018, respectively,2020, was recorded in Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. TEP established a trust to fund its share of estimated final mine reclamation costs at San Juan, which will remain in effect through the completion of final mine reclamation activities currently projected to be 2039. See Note 1 and Note 2 for additional information related to final mine reclamation costs.

64

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Navajo
In December 2019, TEP entered into an agreement with the owner and operator of the Kayenta Mine and the third-party owners of Navajo for the settlement and release of asserted claims associated with the early retirement of Navajo. During 2019, TEP paid $17 million related to the retirement of Navajo which includes $8 million paid for final mine reclamation costs as a result of the settlement. As of December 31, 2019, TEP had 0 liability balance related to Navajo final mine reclamation. A liability balance related to Navajo final mine reclamation of $5 million as of December 31, 2018, was recorded in Current Liabilities—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Performance Guarantees
TEP has joint generation participation agreements with participants at Navajo, San Juan, Four Corners, and Luna.Luna, which expire in 2022, 2041, and 2046, respectively. The Navajo participation agreement expired in 2019, but certain performance obligations continue through the decommissioning of the generation facility. The participants in each of the generation facilities, including TEP, have guaranteed certain performance obligations. Specifically, in the event of payment default, each non-defaulting participant has agreed to bear its proportionate share of expenses otherwise payable by the defaulting participant. In exchange, the non-defaulting participants are entitled to receive their proportionate share of the generation capacity of the defaulting participant. Relative to Navajo performance obligations, in the case of a default, the non-defaulting participants would seek financial recovery directly from the defaulting party. With the exception of Four Corners, there is 0no maximum potential amount of future payments TEP could be required to make under the guarantees. The maximum potential amount of future payments on the non-defaulting parties is $250 million at Four Corners. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there have been 0no such payment defaults under any of the participation agreements. The Navajo participation agreement expired in 2019, but certain performance obligations continue through the decommissioning of the generating station. The San Juan participation agreement expires in 2022, Four Corners in 2041, and Luna in 2046.
Environmental Matters
TEP is subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, renewable portfolio standards, emissions performance standards, climate change, coal combustion byproduct disposal, hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species, and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact TEP's current and future operations. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to a range of interpretations, which may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Because these laws and regulations continue to evolve, TEP is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and consolidated financial results. TEP expects to recover the cost of environmental compliance from its ratepayers.customers. TEP believes it is in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations in all material respects.
Broadway-Pantano Site
The Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund (WQARF) imposes liability on parties responsible for, in whole or in part, the presence of hazardous substances at a site. Those who released, generated, or disposed of hazardous substances at a contaminated site, or transported to or owned such contaminated site, are among the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP).
67


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
PRPs may be strictly liable for clean-up. The ADEQ is administering a remediation plan to delineate and then apportion costs among anticipated adverse parties in the Broadway-Pantano WQARF site, a hazardous waste site in Tucson, Arizona, which includes the Broadway North and South Landfills. Collectively, these landfills were in operation from 1953 and 1973. TEP's Eastloop substationSubstation and a portion of a related transmission line are located on two parcelparcels adjacent to these landfills. OnIn November 8, 2019, the ADEQ notified TEP that it considers TEP to be a PRP with respect to the Broadway-Pantano WQARF site. TEP does not expect this matter to have a material impact on its financial statements,statements; however, the overall investigation and remediation plan have not been finalized.

NOTE 10. EMPLOYEE BENEFITBENEFITS PLANS
PENSION BENEFIT PLANS
TEP has 3 noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans. Benefits are based on years of service and average compensation. NaN of the plans cover the majority of TEP's employees. The Company funds those plans by contributing at least the minimum amount required under IRS regulations. TEP also maintains a SERP for executive management.
OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS PLAN
TEP provides limited healthcare and life insurance benefits for retirees. Active TEP employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach retirement age while working for TEP or an affiliate.

65

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



TEP funds its other postretirement benefits for classified employees through a VEBA. TEP contributed $3 million in 2021 and $1 million in 20192020 and $3 million in 2018 and 2017 to the VEBA.2019. Other postretirement benefits for unclassified employees are self-funded.
REGULATORY RECOVERY
TEP records changes in non-SERP pension and other postretirement defined benefit plans, not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost, as a regulatory asset or liability, as such amounts are probable of future recovery or refund in rates charged to retail customers. Changes in the SERP obligation, not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost, are recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) since SERP expense is not currently recoverable in rates.
The following table presents pension and other postretirement benefit amounts (excluding tax balances) included inon the balance sheet:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2019 2018
Regulatory Assets$135
 $126
 $
 $
Regulatory Liabilities
 
 (1) (3)
Accrued Employee Expenses(2) (1) (2) (3)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits(77) (63) (56) (54)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, SERP10
 6
 
 
Net Amount Recognized$66
 $68
 $(59) $(60)

Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
December 31,
(in millions)2021202020212020
Regulatory Assets$126 $150 $$16 
Accrued Employee Expenses(1)(1)(3)(3)
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits(61)(91)(59)(72)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, SERP13 14 — — 
Net Amount Recognized$77 $72 $(60)$(59)
OBLIGATIONS AND FUNDED STATUS
The Company measured the actuarial present values of all defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. The table below presents the status of all of TEP’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
68


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
All plans had projected benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of plan assets for each period presented:
Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2021202020212020
Change in Benefit Obligation
Beginning of Period$606 $525 $99 $79 
Actuarial (Gain) Loss(6)76 (12)18 
Interest Cost14 16 
Service Cost20 16 
Benefits Paid(34)(27)(5)(5)
End of Period600 606 90 99 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Beginning of Period514 446 24 21 
Actual Return on Plan Assets43 78 
Benefits Paid(32)(26)(2)(5)
Employer Contributions (1)
13 16 
End of Period (2)
538 514 28 24 
Funded Status at End of Period$(62)$(92)$(62)$(75)
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2019 2018
Change in Benefit Obligation       
Beginning of Period$440
 $475
 $74
 $82
Actuarial (Gain) Loss76
 (42) 4
 (8)
Interest Cost18
 16
 3
 2
Service Cost13
 15
 4
 5
Benefits Paid(23) (23) (6) (5)
Plan Amendments1
 (1) 
 (2)
End of Period525
 440
 79
 74
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets       
Beginning of Period376
 403
 17
 17
Actual Return on Plan Assets81
 (25) 4
 (1)
Benefits Paid(22) (23) (6) (5)
Employer Contributions (1)
11
 21
 6
 6
End of Period446
 376
 21
 17
Funded Status at End of Period$(79) $(64) $(58) $(57)
(1)TEP expects to contribute $11 million to the pension plans and less than $1 million to the VEBA trust in 2022.
(1)
TEP expects to contribute $11 million to the pension plans and $1 million to the VEBA trust in 2020.
(2)The $85 million increase in the pension benefit obligation was driven by a significant decrease in discount rates as a result of a decrease in interest rates. The $70 million increase in the pension plan assets was primarily due to positive equity returns and fixed income returns as a result of a decline in interest rates.

66


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table provides the components of TEP’s regulatory assets and accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost as of the dates presented:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2019 2018
Net (Gain) Loss$145
 $133
 $1
 $(1)
Prior Service Cost (Benefit)
 
 (2) (2)

Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2021202020212020
Net Loss$139 $164 $$18 
Prior Service Cost (Benefit)— (2)(2)
The accumulated benefit obligationobligations aggregated for all pension plans was $476 million and $402 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. All of the2021, was $538 million. One pension plansplan had an accumulated benefit obligationsobligation in excess of plan assets as of both December 31, 20192021, compared to all three as of December 31, 2020. This was due to an increase in discount rates and 2018.positive equity returns. The following table includes information for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of pension plan assets:
December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$26 $545 
Fair Value of Plan Assets— 514 
69


 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Accumulated Benefit Obligation$476
 $230
Fair Value of Plan Assets446
 202
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company measures service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve to the plans' liability cash flows. Net periodic benefit plan cost includes the following components:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service Cost$13
 $15
 $13
 $4
 $5
 $4
Non-Service Cost 
           
Interest Cost18
 16
 15
 3
 2
 2
Expected Return on Plan Assets(26) (28) (25) (2) (1) (1)
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss8
 7
 8
 
 
 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost$13
 $10
 $11
 $5
 $6
 $5

Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019202120202019
Service Cost$20 $16 $13 $$$
Non-Service Cost
Interest Cost14 16 18 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(34)(30)(26)(2)(2)(2)
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss— — 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost$$10 $13 $$$
The non-service components of net periodic benefit cost are included in Other, Net on the Consolidated Statements of Income. In 2019 and 2018, TEP capitalized 21% and 19%22% of service cost respectively, as a cost of construction.construction in 2021 and 2020, and 21% in 2019.
The changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized as regulatory assets or in AOCI were as follows:
Pension Benefits Other Postretirement BenefitsPension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
Regulatory Asset AOCI Regulatory AssetRegulatory AssetAOCIRegulatory Asset
(in millions)2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017(in millions)202120202019202120202019202120202019
Current Year Actuarial (Gain) Loss$16
 $12
 $5
 $4
 $(1) $3
 $1
 $(6) $(1)Current Year Actuarial (Gain) Loss$(16)$23 $16 $— $$$(13)$17 $
Amortization of Net Loss(8) (7) (7) (1) 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of Net Loss(8)(8)(8)(1)(1)(1)(1)— — 
Prior Service Credit (Cost)
 
 
 1
 (1) 
 
 (2) 
Prior Service (Credit) CostPrior Service (Credit) Cost— — — — — — — — 
Total Recognized (Gain) Loss$8
 $5
 $(2) $4
 $(2) $3
 $1
 $(8) $(1)Total Recognized (Gain) Loss$(24)$15 $$(1)$$$(14)$17 $
For all pension plans, TEP amortizes prior service costs on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits under the plans.
Net periodic benefit cost is subject to various assumptions and determinations, such as the discount rate, the rate of compensation increase, and the expected return on plan assets. Changes that may arise over time with regard to these assumptions and determinations will change amounts recorded in the future as net periodic benefit cost.
TEP uses a combination of sources in selecting the expected long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption, including an investment return model. The model used provides a “best-estimate” range over 20 years from the25th percentile to the 75th percentile. The model, used as a guideline for selecting the overall rate-of-return-on-assets assumption, is based on forward-looking return expectations only. The above method is used for all asset classes.

67


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table includes the weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Discount Rate3.6% 4.5% 3.3% 4.3%
Rate of Compensation Increase2.8% 2.8% N/A N/A

Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
2021202020212020
Discount Rate3.2%2.9%3.0%2.6%
Rate of Compensation Increase2.8%2.8%N/AN/A
The following table includes the weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs:
Pension BenefitsOther Postretirement Benefits
202120202019202120202019
Discount Rate, Service Cost3.3%3.8%4.7%2.9%3.5%4.5%
Discount Rate, Interest Cost2.3%3.1%4.2%1.9%2.9%4.0%
Rate of Compensation Increase2.8%2.8%2.8%N/AN/AN/A
Expected Return on Plan Assets6.8%6.8%7.0%7.0%7.0%7.0%
 Pension Benefits Other Postretirement Benefits
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Discount Rate, Service Cost4.7% 3.8% 4.4% 4.5% 3.8% 4.3%
Discount Rate, Interest Cost4.2% 3.4% 3.7% 4.0% 3.2% 3.3%
Rate of Compensation Increase2.8% 2.8% 2.8% N/A N/A N/A
Expected Return on Plan Assets7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0%
70


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Healthcare cost trend rates are assumed to decrease gradually from next yearNext Year to the year the ultimate rate is reached:
 December 31,
 2019 2018
Next Year (Pre-65)6.3% 6.5%
Next Year (Post-65)7.5% 7.8%
Ultimate Rate Assumed (Pre-65 and Post-65)4.5% 4.5%
Year Ultimate Rate is Reached (Pre-65)2037 2037
Year Ultimate Rate is Reached (Post-65)2037 2037

December 31,
20212020
Next Year (Pre-65)6.5%6.1%
Next Year (Post-65)5.5%7.1%
Ultimate Rate Assumed (Pre-65 and Post-65)4.5%4.5%
Year Ultimate Rate is Reached (Pre-65)20312037
Year Ultimate Rate is Reached (Post-65)20272037
PENSION PLAN AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT ASSETS
TEP calculates the fair value of plan assets on December 31, the measurement date. Asset allocations, by asset category, on the measurement date were as follows:
 Pension Other Postretirement Benefits
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Asset Category       
Equity Securities46% 45% 65% 60%
Fixed Income Securities45% 45% 33% 38%
Real Estate8% 8% % %
Other1% 2% 2% 2%
Total100% 100% 100% 100%

PensionOther Postretirement Benefits
2021202020212020
Asset Category
Equity Securities54 %47 %63 %63 %
Fixed Income Securities40 %45 %35 %35 %
Real Estate%%— %— %
Other%%%%
Total100 %100 %100 %100 %
As of December 31, 2019,2021, the fair value of VEBA trust assets was $21$28 million, of which $7$10 million were fixed income investments and $14$18 million were equities. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the fair value of VEBA trust assets was $17$24 million, of which $7$9 million were fixed income investments and $10$15 million were equities. The VEBA trust assets are primarily Level 2 assets within the fair value hierarchy described below. There are 0no Level 3 assets in the VEBA trust.

68


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following tables present the fair value measurements of pension plan assets by level within the fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
(in millions)December 31, 2019(in millions)December 31, 2021
Asset Category       Asset Category
Cash Equivalents$2
 $
 $
 $2
Cash Equivalents$$— $— $
Equity Securities:       Equity Securities:
United States Large Cap
 55
 
 55
United States Large Cap— 77 — 77 
United States Small Cap
 21
 
 21
United States Small Cap— 28 — 28 
Non-United States
 80
 
 80
Non-United States— 105 — 105 
Global
 51
 
 51
Global— 83 — 83 
Fixed Income
 199
 
 199
Fixed Income— 213 — 213 
Real Estate
 10
 23
 33
Real Estate— — 26 26 
Private Equity
 
 5
 5
Private Equity— — 
Total$2
 $416
 $28
 $446
Total$$506 $30 $538 
 December 31, 2018
Asset Category       
Cash Equivalents$1
 $
 $
 $1
Equity Securities:       
United States Large Cap
 45
 
 45
United States Small Cap
 17
 
 17
Non-United States
 67
 
 67
Global
 42
 
 42
Fixed Income
 167
 
 167
Real Estate
 9
 22
 31
Private Equity
 
 6
 6
Total$1
 $347
 $28
 $376
71


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in millions)December 31, 2020
Asset Category
Equity Securities:
United States Large Cap$— $65 $— $65 
United States Small Cap— 25 — 25 
Non-United States— 95 — 95 
Global— 59 — 59 
Fixed Income— 231 — 231 
Real Estate— 12 23 35 
Private Equity— — 
Total$— $487 $27 $514 
Level 1 cash equivalents are based on observable market prices and are comprised of the fair value of commercial paper, money market funds, and certificates of deposit.
Level 2 investments comprise amounts held in commingled equity funds, United States bond funds, and real estate funds. Valuations are based on active market quoted prices for assets held by each respective fund.
Level 3 real estate investments values are generally determined by appraisals conducted in accordance with accepted appraisal guidelines, including consideration of projected income and expenses of the property as well as recent sales of similar properties.
Level 3 private equity funds are classified as funds-of-funds. They are valued based on individual fund manager valuation models.

69


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table presents a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of pension plan assets classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. There were 0no transfers in or out of Level 3.
(in millions)Private Equity Real Estate Total
Balance as of December 31, 2017$6
 $21
 $27
Actual Return on Plan Assets:    

Assets Held at Reporting Date2
 1
 3
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements(2) 
 (2)
Balance as of December 31, 20186
 22
 28
Actual Return on Plan Assets:     
Assets Held at Reporting Date1
 1
 2
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements(2) 
 (2)
Balance as of December 31, 2019$5
 $23
 $28

(in millions)Private EquityReal EstateTotal
Balance as of December 31, 2019$$23 $28 
Actual Return on Plan Assets:
Assets Held at Reporting Date— — — 
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements(1)— (1)
Balance as of December 31, 202023 27 
Actual Return on Plan Assets:
Assets Held at Reporting Date
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements(2)— (2)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$$26 $30 
Pension Plan Investments
Investment Goals
Asset allocation is the principal method for achieving each pension plan’s investment objectives while maintaining appropriate levels of risk. TEP considers the projected impact on benefit security of any proposed changes to the current asset allocation policy. The expected long-term returns and implications for pension plan sponsor funding are reviewed in selecting policies to ensure that current asset pools are projected to be adequate to meet the expected liabilities of the pension plans. TEP expects to use asset allocation policies weighted most heavily to equity and fixed income funds, while maintaining some exposure to real estate and opportunistic funds. Within the fixed income allocation, long-duration funds may be used to partially hedge interest rate risk.
Risk Management
TEP recognizes the difficulty of achieving investment objectives in light of the uncertainties and complexities of the investment markets. The Company recognizes some risk must be assumed to achieve a pension plan’s long-term investment objectives. In establishing risk tolerances, the following factors affecting risk tolerance and risk objectives will be considered: (i) plan status;
72


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(ii) plan sponsor financial status and profitability; (iii) plan features; and (iv) workforce characteristics. TEP determined that the pension plans can tolerate some interim fluctuations in market value and rates of return in order to achieve long-term objectives. TEP tracks each pension plan’s portfolio relative to the benchmark through quarterly investment reviews. The reviews consist of a performance and risk assessment of all investment categories and on the portfolio as a whole. Investment managers for the pension plan may use derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes or as part of their investment strategy. Currency hedges may also be used for defensive purposes.
Relationship between Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
The overall health of each plan will be monitored by comparing the value of plan obligations (both Accumulated Benefit Obligation and Projected Benefit Obligation) against the fair value of assets and tracking the changes in each. The frequency of this monitoring will depend on the availability of plan data, but will be no less frequent than annually via actuarial valuation.

70


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Target Allocation Percentages
The current target allocation percentages for the major asset categories of the plan follow. Each plan allows a variance of +/- 2% from targets before funds are automatically rebalanced.rebalanced:
 Pension Other Postretirement Benefits
 December 31, 2019
Cash/Treasury Bills—% 2%
Equity Securities:   
United States Large Cap12% 39%
United States Small Cap5% 5%
Non-United States Developed—% 7%
Non-United States Emerging—% 9%
Global Equity26% —%
Global Infrastructure3% —%
Fixed Income45% 38%
Real Estate8% —%
Private Equity1% —%
Total100% 100%

PensionOther Postretirement Benefits
December 31, 2021
Cash/Treasury Bills—%2%
Equity Securities:
United States Large Cap13%39%
United States Small Cap5%5%
Non-United States Developed—%7%
Non-United States Emerging—%9%
Global Equity32%—%
Global Infrastructure3%—%
Fixed Income40%38%
Real Estate6%—%
Private Equity1%—%
Total100%100%
Pension Fund Descriptions
For each type of asset category selected by the Pension Committee, TEP's investment consultant assembles a group of third-party fund managers and allocates a portion of the total investment to each fund manager. In the case of the private equity fund, TEP's investment consultant directs investments to a private equity manager that invests in third-parties’ funds.
ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS
TEP expects the following benefit payments to be made by the plans, which reflect future service, as appropriate.appropriate:
(in millions)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025-2029
Pension Benefits$26
 $26
 $26
 $27
 $28
 $147
Other Postretirement Benefits5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 25

(in millions)202220232024202520262027-2031
Pension Benefits$28 $29 $29 $29 $30 $158 
Other Postretirement Benefits26 
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
TEP offers a defined contribution savings plan to all eligible employees. The plan meets the IRS required standards for 401(k) qualified plans. Participants direct the investment of contributions to certain funds in their account. The Company matches part of a participant’s contributions to the plan. TEP made matching contributions to the plan of $6 million in 2019, $7 million in 2018,2021 and $6 million in 2017.2020 and 2019.

73


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
2020 FORTIS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT PLAN
The Fortis Board of Directors ratified the 2020 Restricted Stock Unit Plan (2020 Plan) effective January 2020. Under the 2020 Plan, executive officers of Fortis and its subsidiaries may be granted time-based RSUs annually, which may be settled in cash or shares. Each RSU granted is valued based on 1 share of Fortis common stock traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, converted to U.S. dollars. UNS Energy allocates the obligation and expense for this plan to its subsidiaries based on the Massachusetts Formula. Fortis accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
The following table represents RSUs awarded by Fortis for UNS Energy:
20212020
RSUs20,794 15,751 
The awards are initially classified as liability awards because: (i) executive officers have the option to elect the cash or share settlement feature; and (ii) this election is contingent on an event within the executive officers' control. The liability awards may be reclassified as equity awards if the executive officers elect the share settlement feature on the modification date. Liability awards are measured at their fair value at the end of each reporting period and will fluctuate based on the price of Fortis' common stock. The awards are payable on the third anniversary of the grant date. TEP's allocated share of probable payout was $2 million and $1 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
TEP's allocated portion of compensation expense is recognized in Operations and Maintenance Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Compensation expense associated with unvested RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum required service period in an amount equal to the fair value on the measurement date or each reporting period. TEP recorded no compensation expense in 2021 and $1 million in 2020 based on its share of Fortis' compensation expense.
2015 SHARE UNIT PLAN
The Human Resources and Governance Committee of UNS Energy approved and UNS Energy's Board of Directors ratified the 2015 Share Unit Plan (Plan)(2015 Plan) effective January 2015. Under the 2015 Plan, key employees, including executive officers of UNS Energy and its subsidiaries, may be granted long-term incentive awards of PSUs and RSUs annually. Each PSU and RSU granted is valued based on 1 share of Fortis common stock traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, converted to U.S. dollars. UNS Energy allocates the obligation and expense for this plan to its subsidiaries based on the Massachusetts Formula. UNS Energy accounts for forfeitures as they occur.

71


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table represents PSUs and RSUs awarded by UNS Energy:
202120202019
PSUs44,931 35,328 66,978 
RSUs (1)
2,401 1,918 33,489 
 2019 2018 2017
PSUs66,978
 54,426
 68,126
RSUs33,489
 27,213
 34,063

(1)
Effective January 2020, executive officer RSU awards are issued through the 2020 Plan. Certain key employees will continue to be awarded RSUs through the 2015 Plan.
The awards are classified as liability awards based on the cash settlement feature. Liability awards are measured at their fair value at the end of each reporting period and will fluctuate based on the price of Fortis' common stock as well as the level of achievement of the financial performance criteria. The awards are payable on the third anniversary of the grant date. TEP's allocated share of probable payout was $12$9 million and $9$10 million as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
TEP's allocated portion of compensation expense is recognized in Operations and Maintenance Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Compensation expense associated with unvested PSUs and RSUs is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum required service period in an amount equal to the fair value on the measurement date or each reporting period. TEP recorded $4 million in 2019, $22021, $3 million in 2018,2020, and $4 million in 20172019 based on its share of UNS Energy's compensation expense.

74


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
CASH TRANSACTIONS
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Interest Paid, Net of Amounts Capitalized$76 $76 $80 
Income Tax Refunds (1)
— (14)(14)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Interest Paid, Net of Amounts Capitalized$80
 $67
 $61
Income Tax Refunds (1)
(14) 
 

(1)
TEP received refunds of AMT credit carryforwards in 2020 and 2019. See Note 14 for additional information regarding AMT.
(1)
TEP received a refund of AMT credit carryforwards in 2019. See Note 14 for additional information regarding AMT.
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
Other significant non-cash investing and financing activities that resulted in recognition of assets and liabilities but did not result in cash receipts or payments were as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Accrued Capital Expenditures$38 $26 $40 
Asset Retirement Obligations Increase (Decrease) (1)
34 (12)26 
Renewable Energy Credits
Operating Leases (2)
— 
Finance Leases— — 67 
Net Cost of Removal Increase (Decrease) (3)
(41)(34)(10)
(1)The non-cash additions to AROs and related capitalized assets represent a revision of estimated asset retirement cost due to changes in timing and amount of expected future cash flows.
(2)In 2019, TEP adopted accounting guidance that requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. TEP applied the transition provisions of the new standard as of the adoption date and did not retrospectively adjust prior periods.
(3)Represents an accrual for future cost of retirement net of salvage values that does not impact earnings. See Note 1 for additional information related to new depreciation rates approved as part of the 2020 Rate Order.

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Finance Leases$67
 $164
 $
Accrued Capital Expenditures40
 31
 24
Asset Retirement Obligations Increase (Decrease) (1)
26
 20
 10
Operating Leases (2)
8
 
 
Renewable Energy Credits3
 3
 2
Net Cost of Removal Increase (Decrease) (3)
(10) (4) (88)
(1)
The non-cash additions to AROs and related capitalized assets represent a revision of estimated asset retirement cost due to changes in timing and amount of expected future AROs.
(2)
On January 1 2019, TEP adopted accounting guidance that requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. TEP applied the transition provisions of the new standard as of the adoption date and did not retrospectively adjust prior periods.
(3)
Represents an accrual for future cost of retirement net of salvage values that does not impact earnings.


72


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



NOTE 13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
TEP categorizes financial instruments into the three-level hierarchy based on inputs used to determine the fair value. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in non-active markets, and pricing models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity. TEP has no financial instruments categorized as Level 3.
75


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
The following tables present, by level within the fair value hierarchy, TEP’s assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value through net income on a recurring basis classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 TotalLevel 1Level 2Total
(in millions)December 31, 2019(in millions)December 31, 2021
Assets Assets
Restricted Cash (1)
$18
 $
 $
 $18
Restricted Cash (1)
$23 $— $23 
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)

 3
 
 3
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)
— 30 30 
Energy Derivative Contracts, No Regulatory Recovery (2)

 3
 
 3
Energy Derivative Contracts, No Regulatory Recovery (2)
— 
Total Assets18
 6
 
 24
Total Assets23 34 57 
Liabilities       Liabilities
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)

 (76) 
 (76)
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)
— (20)(20)
Total Liabilities
 (76) 
 (76)Total Liabilities— (20)(20)
Total Assets (Liabilities), Net$18
 $(70) $
 $(52)Total Assets (Liabilities), Net$23 $14 $37 
(in millions)December 31, 2018(in millions)December 31, 2020
Assets Assets
Cash Equivalents (1)
$55
 $
 $
 $55
Restricted Cash (1)
15
 
 
 15
Restricted Cash (1)
$21 $— $21 
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)

 10
 
 10
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)
— 14 14 
Energy Derivative Contracts, No Regulatory Recovery (2)

 
 2
 2
Energy Derivative Contracts, No Regulatory Recovery (2)
— 
Total Assets70
 10
 2
 82
Total Assets21 17 38 
Liabilities       Liabilities
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)

 (35) (2) (37)
Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery (2)
— (66)(66)
Total Liabilities
 (35) (2) (37)Total Liabilities— (66)(66)
Total Assets (Liabilities), Net$70
 $(25) $
 $45
Total Assets (Liabilities), Net$21 $(49)$(28)
(1)
Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash represent
(1)Restricted Cash represents amounts held in money market funds, and certificates of deposit, which approximates fair market value. Cash Equivalents are included in Cash and Cash Equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Restricted Cash is included in Investments and Other Property and in Current Assets—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Energy Derivative Contracts include gas swap agreements and forward power purchase and sale contracts entered into to reduce exposure to energy price risk. These contracts are included in Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)
Energy Derivative Contracts include gas swap agreements (Level 2) and forward purchased power and sales contracts (Level 2 as of December 31, 2019 and Level 3 as of December 31, 2018) entered into to reduce exposure to energy price risk. These contracts are included in Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In 2019, Derivative Contract Liabilities increased primarily due to decreases in forward market prices of natural gas and increases in volume.

73
76


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



All energy derivative contracts are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk. TEP presents derivatives on a gross basis inon the balance sheet. The tables below present the potential offset of counterparty netting and cash collateral.collateral:
 Gross Amount Recognized in the Balance Sheets Gross Amount Not Offset in the Balance Sheets Net Amount
  Counterparty Netting of Energy Contracts Cash Collateral Received/Posted 
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Derivative Assets       
Energy Derivative Contracts$6
 $4
 $
 $2
Derivative Liabilities       
Energy Derivative Contracts(76) (4) (2) (70)
(in millions)December 31, 2018
Derivative Assets       
Energy Derivative Contracts$12
 $11
 $
 $1
Derivative Liabilities       
Energy Derivative Contracts(37) (11) 
 (26)

Gross Amount Recognized in the Balance SheetsGross Amount Not Offset in the Balance SheetsNet Amount
Counterparty Netting of Energy ContractsCash Collateral Received/Posted
(in millions)December 31, 2021
Derivative Assets
Energy Derivative Contracts$34 $14 $— $20 
Derivative Liabilities
Energy Derivative Contracts(20)(14)— (6)
(in millions)December 31, 2020
Derivative Assets
Energy Derivative Contracts$17 $14 $— $
Derivative Liabilities
Energy Derivative Contracts(66)(14)(7)(45)
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
TEP enters into various derivative and non-derivative contracts to reduce exposure to energy price risk associated with its natural gas and purchased power requirements. The objectives for entering into such contracts include: (i) creating price stability; (ii) meeting load and reserve requirements; and (iii) reducing exposure to price volatility that may result from delayed recovery under the PPFAC mechanism. In addition, TEP enters into derivative and non-derivative contracts to optimize the system's generation resources by selling power in the wholesale market for the benefit of the Company'sTEP's retail customers.
The CompanyTEP primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements. When TEP has observable inputs for substantially the full term of the asset or liability or uses quoted prices in an inactive market, it categorizes the instrument in Level 2. TEP categorizes derivatives in Level 3 when an aggregate pricing service or published prices that represent a consensus reporting of multiple brokers is used.
For both purchased power and natural gas prices, TEP obtains quotes from brokers, major market participants, exchanges, or industry publications and relies on its own price experience from active transactions in the market. The CompanyTEP primarily uses one set of quotations each for purchased power and natural gas and then validates those prices using other sources. TEP believes that the market information provided is reflective of market conditions as of the time and date indicated.
Published prices for energy derivative contracts may not be available due to the nature of contract delivery terms such as non-standard time blocks and non-standard delivery points. In these cases, TEP applies adjustments based on historical price curve relationships, transmission costs, and line losses.
TEP also considers the impact of counterparty credit risk using current and historical default and recovery rates, as well as its own credit risk using credit default swap data.
The inputs and the Company's assessments of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurements require judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. TEP reviews the assumptions underlying its price curves monthly.
Cash Flow Hedges
To mitigate the exposure to volatility in variable interest rates on debt, TEP had an interest rate swap agreement that expired in January 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the total notional amount of the interest rate swap was $6 million. NaN notional amount remained as of February 12, 2020. The after-tax unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedge activities were reported in the statement of comprehensive income. The estimated loss expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months and the realized loss recorded to Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income are not material to TEP's financial position or results of operations.

74

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Energy Derivative Contracts, Regulatory Recovery
TEP enters into energy contracts that are considered derivatives and qualify for regulatory recovery. The realized gains and losses on these energy contracts are recovered through the PPFAC mechanism and the unrealized gains and losses are deferred as a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability. The table below presents the unrealized gains and losses recorded to a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability inon the balance sheet:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Unrealized Net Gain (Loss) (1)
$62 $21 $(45)
(1)Increase in unrealized net gain on regulatory recoverable derivative contracts is primarily due to increases in forward market prices of natural gas.
77


 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Unrealized Net Loss (1)
$(45) $(9) $(18)
Table of Contents
(1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In 2019, unrealized net loss on regulatory recoverable derivative contracts increased primarily due to decreases in forward market prices of natural gas and increases in volume.
Energy Derivative Contracts, No Regulatory Recovery
TEP enters into certain energy contracts that are considered derivatives but do not qualify for regulatory recovery. The Company records unrealized gains and losses for these contracts in the income statement unless a normal purchase or normal sale election is made. For contracts that meet the trading definition, as defined in the PPFAC plan of administration, TEP must share 10% of any realized gains with retail customers through the PPFAC mechanism. The table below presents amounts recorded in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Operating Revenues$6
 $5
 $5

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Operating Revenues$$$
Derivative Volumes
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had energy contracts that will settle on various expiration dates through 2029. The following table presents volumes associated with the energy contracts:
December 31,December 31,
2019 201820212020
Power Contracts GWh4,740
 1,743
Power Contracts GWh2,617 4,143 
Gas Contracts BBtu122,779
 146,933
Gas Contracts BBtu112,316 111,585 

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
As of December 31, 2019, TEP does not have any Level 3 assets and liabilities balances remaining. The following table provides quantitative information regarding significant unobservable inputs in TEP’s Level 3 fair value measurements:
 Valuation Approach Fair Value of Unobservable Inputs Range of Unobservable Inputs
  Assets Liabilities  
(in millions)December 31, 2018
Forward Power ContractsMarket approach $3
 $(2) Market price per MWh $16.80
 $47.05

Changes in one or more of the unobservable inputs could have a significant impact on the fair value measurement depending on the magnitude of the change and the direction of the change for each input. The impact of changes to fair value, including changes from unobservable inputs, are subject to recovery or refund through the PPFAC mechanism and are reported as a regulatory asset or regulatory liability, or as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), rather than in the income statement.

75

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The following table presents a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of net assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and the gains (losses) attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets (liabilities) still held at the end of the period:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$1
 $2
Gains (Losses) Recorded   
Regulatory Assets or Liabilities, Derivative Instruments(12) (4)
Operating Revenues5
 5
Settlements1
 (2)
Transfers Out of Level 3 (1)
5
 
End of Period$
 $1
    
Gains (Losses), Assets (Liabilities) Still Held$
 $1

(1)
Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because observable market data became available for the assets and liabilities.
CREDIT RISK
The use of contractual arrangements to manage the risks associated with changes in energy commodity prices creates credit risk exposure resulting from the possibility of non-performance by counterparties pursuant to the terms of their contractual obligations. TEP enters into contracts for the physical delivery of power and natural gas which contain remedies in the event of non-performance by the supply counterparties. In addition, volatile energy prices can create significant credit exposure from energy market receivables and subsequent measurements at fair value.
TEP has contractual agreements for energy procurement and hedging activities that contain certain provisions requiring TEP and its counterparties to post collateral under certain circumstances. These circumstances include: (i) exposures in excess of unsecured credit limits;limits due to the volume of trading activity; (ii) changes in natural gas or power prices; (iii) credit rating downgrades; or (iii) a failure to meet certain financial ratios.(iv) unfavorable changes in parties' assessments of each other's credit strength. In the event that such credit events were to occur, the Company,TEP, or its counterparties, would have to provide certain credit enhancements in the form of cash, LOCs, or other acceptable security to collateralize exposure beyond the allowed amounts.
TEP considers the effect of counterparty credit risk in determining the fair value of derivative instruments that are in a net asset position, after incorporating collateral posted by counterparties, and then allocates the credit risk adjustment to individual contracts. TEP also considers the impact of its credit risk on instruments that are in a net liability position, after considering the collateral posted, and then allocates the credit risk adjustment to the individual contracts.
The value of all derivative instruments in net liability positions under contracts with credit risk-related contingent features, including contracts under the normal purchase normal sale exception, was $100$26 million as of December 31, 2019,2021, compared with $41$60 million as of December 31, 2018. 2020.As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had $2 million ofno cash posted as collateral to provide credit enhancement which was reflected in Current Assets—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of February 12, 2020, there was 0 collateral posted.enhancement. If the credit risk contingent features were triggered on December 31, 2019,2021, TEP would have been required to post an additional $98$26 million of collateral of which $19$21 million relates to outstanding net payable balances for settled positions.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS NOT CARRIED AT FAIR VALUE
The fair value of a financial instrument is the market price to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date. Borrowings under revolving credit facilities approximate fair value dueDue to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. These itemsborrowings under revolving credit facilities approximating fair value, they have been excluded from the table below.

78
76

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



The use of different estimation methods and/or market assumptions may yield different estimated fair value amounts. The following table includes the net carrying value and estimated fair value of TEP's long-term debt:
Net Carrying ValueFair Value
Fair Value HierarchyDecember 31,
(in millions)2021202020212020
Liabilities
Long-Term Debt, including Current MaturitiesLevel 2$2,135 $2,064 $2,357 $2,363 
   Net Carrying Value Fair Value
 Fair Value Hierarchy December 31,
(in millions) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Liabilities         
Long-Term Debt, including Current MaturitiesLevel 2 $1,602
 $1,615
 $1,755
 $1,672


NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the United States statutory federal income tax rate of 21% in 2019 and 2018 and 35% in 2017 to pre-tax income due to the following:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Federal Income Tax Expense at Statutory Rate$49 $49 $46 
State Income Tax Expense, Net of Federal Deduction
Federal/State Tax Credits (1)
(10)(3)(6)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(3)(7)(3)
Excess Deferred Income Taxes(14)(7)(9)
Impact of AMT Sequestration— — (2)
Other— (1)
Total Income Tax Expense$32 $41 $34 
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Federal Income Tax Expense at Statutory Rate$46
 $49
 $97
State Income Tax Expense, Net of Federal Deduction9
 9
 9
Federal/State Tax Credits(6) (10) (9)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(3) (1) (2)
Impact of Enactment, TCJA
 
 7
Excess Deferred Income Taxes(9) (6) 
Impact of AMT Sequestration(2) 2
 
Other(1) 
 (1)
Total Federal and State Income Tax Expense$34
 $43
 $101

(1)
In 2021, TEP realized PTC benefits of $7 million related to Oso Grande being placed in service in May 2021.
Income Tax Expense included on the Consolidated Statements of Income consists of the following:
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Current Income Tax Expense     
Federal$(8) $(13) $
State
 
 
Total Current Income Tax Expense(8) (13) 
Deferred Income Tax Expense     
Federal41
 53
 98
Federal Investment Tax Credits(4) (6) (6)
State5
 9
 9
Total Deferred Income Tax Expense42
 56
 101
Total Federal and State Income Tax Expense$34
 $43
 $101

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States of America signed into law the TCJA, which enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code including a reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after 2017.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202120202019
Current Income Tax Expense
Federal$(2)$(2)$(8)
State— — 
Total Current Income Tax Expense(2)(1)(8)
Deferred Income Tax Expense
Federal27 37 41 
Federal Investment Tax Credits(1)(1)(4)
State
Total Deferred Income Tax Expense34 42 42 
Total Income Tax Expense$32 $41 $34 
In 2018, ACC Refund Orders were approved requiring TEP to share EDIT amortization of the ACC-jurisdictional assets with customers. The EDIT activity of $14 million, $7 million, and $9 million was amortized from Regulatory Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. As part of the 2020 Rate Order, TEP received approval of a TEAM that allows income tax changes that materially affect TEP’s authorized revenue requirement to be shared with customers including changes in EDIT amortization. Effective January 1, 2021, TEP shares any changes in its EDIT amortization through the usage-based adjustor. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the ACC Refund Order and the FERC NOPR.2020 Rate Order.
Under the TCJA, existing AMT credit carryforwards willcould be refunded if notor used to offset U.S. federal income tax liabilities. Asliabilities through our 2021 tax year. Along with other significant provisions, the CARES Act accelerated the recovery of December 31, 2019, TEP had a receivableremaining AMT credits by allowing corporations to immediately claim refunds of $7all unused carryforward balances. In 2020, the remaining AMT credit carryforward balance of $14 million relatedwas refunded to the AMT credit carryforwards in Current Assets—Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Company.
77
79


Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



In 2018, the Company recorded $2 million of income tax expense related to the estimated impact of sequestration on future AMT credit refunds. In 2019, TEP reversed the $2 million in income tax expense, as the AMT credit refunds were no longer subject to sequestration due to the IRS revising previously issued guidance.
The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets   
Finance Lease Obligations$21
 $48
Operating Loss Carryforwards, Net3
 23
Customer Advances and Contributions in Aid of Construction19
 16
AMT Credit7
 13
Other Postretirement Benefits15
 15
Investment Tax Credit Carryforward34
 34
Income Taxes Recoverable Through Future Rates81
 87
Other79
 60
Total Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets259
 296
Deferred Tax Assets Valuation Allowance
 
Gross Deferred Income Tax Liabilities   
Plant, Net(602) (552)
Plant Abandonments(17) (18)
Finance Lease Assets, Net(18) (44)
Pensions(17) (19)
Income Taxes Payable Through Future Rates(9) (12)
Other(28) (21)
Total Gross Deferred Income Tax Liabilities(691) (666)
Deferred Income Taxes, Net$(432) $(370)

December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets
Customer Advances and Contributions in Aid of Construction$20 $19 
Other Postretirement Benefits15 15 
Investment Tax Credit Carryforward23 19 
Income Taxes Payable Through Future Rates67 74 
Other93 76 
Total Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets218 203 
Gross Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
Plant, Net(682)(639)
PPFAC(23)(6)
Plant Abandonments(8)(11)
Pensions(18)(17)
Income Taxes Recoverable Through Future Rates(4)(7)
Other(32)(16)
Total Gross Deferred Income Tax Liabilities(767)(696)
Deferred Income Taxes, Net$(549)$(493)
TEP recorded 0no valuation allowance against all other tax credit and net operating loss carryforward deferred income tax assets as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. Management believes TEP will produce sufficient taxable income in the future to realize credit and net operating loss carryforwards before they expire.
As of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP had the following carryforward amounts:
(in millions)Amount Expiring Year
Federal Net Operating Loss$17
 2034 - 35
State Credits9
 2022 - 29
AMT Credit7
 None
Investment Tax Credits34
 2031 - 37

($ in millions)AmountExpiring Year
State Net Operating Loss$2026
State Credits2023 - 29
Investment Tax Credits22 2034 - 41
Other Federal Credits2034 - 41
UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of unrecognized tax benefits follows:
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Beginning of Period$16
 $13
Additions Based on Tax Positions Taken in the Current Year2
 3
End of Period$18
 $16

December 31,
(in millions)20212020
Beginning of Period$19 $18 
Additions Based on Tax Positions Taken in the Current Year— 
Reductions Based on Positions Taken in Prior Years(18)— 
End of Period$$19 
Unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would reduce income tax expense by less than $1 million as of December 31, 2019in 2021 and 2018.

78

Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



2020.
TEP recorded 0no interest expense during 2019in 2021 and 20182020 related to uncertain tax positions. In addition, TEP had 0no interest payable and 0no penalties accrued as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.
TEP has been audited by the IRS through tax year 2010. TEP's 2011 to 20182020 tax years are open for audit by federal and state tax agencies.
ATEP had previously filed an application with the IRS for a change in accounting method on uncertain tax positions. On February 2, 2021, TEP received approval of this application from the IRS which resulted in a $18 million decrease of $17 million in the Company's uncertain tax position obligations could occur within the next twelve months pending the outcome of an application for change in accounting method filed with the IRS.on a prospective basis.
80


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)
TAX SHARING AGREEMENT
Under the terms of the tax sharing agreement with UNS Energy, TEP made net payments of $7 million in 2021 and received net refunds of $10 million in 2020 and $14 million in 2019 related to the 2018 Federal income tax returns and 0 payments in 2018 related to the 2017 Federal income tax returns.


79
81


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)

NOTE 15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
TEP's quarterly financial information is unaudited, but, in management’s opinion, includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. TEP's utility business is seasonal in nature. Peak sales periods for TEP generally occur during the summer. Accordingly, comparisons among quarters of a year may not represent overall trends and changes in operations.
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
(in millions)2019
Operating Revenue$333
 $326
 $441
 $318
Operating Income43
 67
 134
 39
Net Income26
 42
 98
 21
        
 2018
Operating Revenue$275
 $354
 $460
 $344
Operating Income43
 83
 126
 36
Net Income24
 58
 95
 11


80







ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
TEP’s Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) supervised and participated in TEP’s evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a–15(e) and Rule 15d–15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in TEP’s periodic reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by TEP in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon the evaluation performed, TEP’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that TEP’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
TEP’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of TEP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations Internal Control – Integrated Framework.
Based on management’s assessment using those criteria, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2021, TEP’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in TEP’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 20192021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, TEP’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.


ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
81
82








PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information required by Item 10 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by Item 11 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by Item 12 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by Item 13 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Pre-Approved Policies and Procedures
Rules adopted by the SEC in order to implement requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require public company audit committees to pre-approve audit and non-audit services. UNS Energy’s Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a policy pursuant to which audit, audit-related, tax, and other services are pre-approved by category of service. Recognizing that situations may arise where it is in the Company’s best interest for the auditor to perform services in addition to the annual audit of the Company’s financial statements, the policy sets forth guidelines and procedures with respect to approval of the four categories of service designed to achieve the continued independence of the auditor when it is retained to perform such services for UNS Energy. The policy requires the Audit and Risk Committee to be informed of each service and does not include any delegation of the Audit and Risk Committee’s responsibilities to management. The Audit and Risk Committee may delegate to the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and non-audit services requiring Audit and Risk Committee approval where the Audit and Risk Committee Chair believes it is desirable to pre-approve such services prior to the next regularly scheduled Audit and Risk Committee meeting. The decisions of the Audit and Risk Committee Chair to pre-approve any such services from one regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting to the next shall be reported to the Audit and Risk Committee.
Fees
The Audit and Risk Committee has considered whether the provision of services to TEP by Deloitte & Touche LLP, PCAOB ID No. 34 (Deloitte), beyond those rendered in connection with their audit and review of TEP’s financial statements, is compatible with maintaining their independence as auditor.
The following table details principal accountant fees paid to Deloitte for professional services:
(in thousands)20212020
Audit Fees (1)
$1,126 $1,027 
Audit-Related Fees (2)
— 45 
Total$1,126 $1,072 
(in thousands)2019 2018
Audit Fees (1)
$924
 $1,268
Audit-Related Fees (2)
100
 140
Tax Fees (3)
25
 
Total$1,049
 $1,408
(1)(1)Audit Fees includes fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte, for professional services for the financial statement audits of TEP's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and review services of TEP's consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit Fees also includes services provided by Deloitte in
Audit Fees includes fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte, for professional services for the financial statement audits of TEP's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and review services of TEP's consolidated financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Audit Fees also includes services provided by Deloitte in

82
83



connection with comfort letters, consents, and other services related to SEC matters, financing transactions, and statutory and regulatory audits.
(2)
(2)Audit-Related Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and are not included in Audit Fees reported above. The fees are for additional procedures for nonrecurring material transactions in 2020.
Audit-Related Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and are not included in Audit Fees reported above. The fees are for additional procedures for nonrecurring material transactions in 2019 and 2018.
(3)
Tax Fees are fees billed by Deloitte for professional services related to tax planning and tax strategy.
All services performed by our principal accountant are approved in advance by the Audit and Risk Committee in accordance with the Audit and Risk Committee’s pre-approval policy for services provided by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


83
84








PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Page
(a)(1)Page
(a)(1)Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019:2021:
(2)Financial Statement Schedule
All schedules have been omitted because they are either not applicable, not required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included on the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits
Reference is made to the Exhibit Index commencing on page 8586.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not Applicable.


84
85








Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.Description
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.Description
Restated Articles of Incorporation of TEP, filed with the ACC on August 11, 1994, as amended by Amendment to Article Fourth of our Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the ACC on May 17, 1996. (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit No 3(a)).
TEP Articles of Amendment filed with the ACC on September 3, 2009 (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 3(a)).
Bylaws of TEP, as amended as of August 12, 2015 (Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 3).
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of UNS Energy Corporation, creating series of Limited Voting Junior Preferred Stock (Form 8-K dated August 12, 2015, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 3.2).
Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 2009, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank Trust National Association authorizing Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2009 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Navajo Project). (Form 8-K dated October 13, 2009, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(A)).
Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2009, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and TEP relating to Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2009 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company San Juan Project). (Form 8-K dated October 13, 2009, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(B)).
Indenture of Trust, dated as of October 1, 2010, between the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, authorizing Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated October 8, 2010, File No. 1-05924 Exhibit 4(a)).
Loan Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2010, between the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and TEP, relating to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated October 8, 2010, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(b)).
Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2012, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Apache and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, authorizing Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2012 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated March 21, 2012, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(a)).
Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2012, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Apache and TEP, relating to Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, 2012 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated March 21, 2012, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(b)).
Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2012, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, authorizing Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2012 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated June 21, 2012, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(a)).
Loan Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and TEP, relating to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2012 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated June 21, 2012, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(b)).
Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2013, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, authorizing Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2013 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated March 14, 2013, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(a)).
Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2013, between The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and TEP, relating to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, 2013 Series A (Tucson Electric Power Company Project). (Form 8-K dated March 14, 2013, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(b)).

85








Indenture, dated November 1, 2011, between Tucson Electric Power Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, authorizing unsecured Notes (Form 8-K dated November 8, 2011, File 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Officers Certificate, dated November 8, 2011, authorizing 5.15% Notes due 2021 (Form 8-K dated November 8, 2011, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.2).
Officers Certificate, dated September 14, 2012, authorizing 3.85% Notes due 2023 (Form 8-K dated September 14, 2012, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Officer's Certificate, dated March 10, 2014, authorizing 5.00% Senior Notes due 2044 (Form 8-K dated March 10, 2014, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Officer's Certificate, dated February 27, 2015, authorizing 3.05% Senior Notes due 2025 (Form 8-K dated February 27, 2015, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(a)).
Officer's Certificate, dated November 29, 2018, authorizing 4.85% Senior Notes due 2048.2048 (Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4(g)(6)).
Officer's Certificate, dated April 9, 2020, authorizing 4.00% Senior Notes due 2050 (Form 8-K dated April 9, 2020, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
86


Officer's Certificate, dated August 10, 2020, authorizing 1.50% Senior Notes due 2030 (Form 8-K dated August 10, 2020, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Officer's Certificate, dated May 11, 2021, authorizing 3.25% Senior Notes due 2051 (Form 8-K dated May 11, 2021, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2015,2021, among Tucson Electric Power Company, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and a group of lenders (Form 8-K dated October 15, 2015,2021, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2019, among Tucson Electric Power Company, Truist Bank, as Administrative Agent, and a group of lenders (Form 8-K dated December 11, 2019, File No. 1-05924 - Exhibit 4.1).
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Power of Attorney.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, by David G. Hutchens.Susan M. Gray.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, by Frank P. Marino.
Statements of Corporate Officers (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
104The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2021, formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
*Previously filed as indicated and incorporated herein by reference.
**Previously filed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 1012021.
***
*Previously filed as indicated and incorporated herein by reference.
**Pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, this certificate is not being “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

87
86





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
(Registrant)
Date:May 20, 2022TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
(Registrant)
Date:February 12, 2020/s/ Frank P. Marino
Frank P. Marino
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date:May 20, 2022*
Date:February 12, 2020*Susan M. Gray
David G. Hutchens
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:February 12, 2020May 20, 2022/s/ Frank P. Marino
Frank P. Marino
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:February 12, 2020May 20, 2022*
Susan M. Gray
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director
Date:February 12, 2020*
Todd C. Hixon
Director
*By:/s/ Frank P. Marino
Frank P. Marino
Attorney-in-fact


87
88