UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ____________

Commission File Number 1-6075

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

UTAHUtah

13-2626465

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

1400 DOUGLAS STREET, OMAHA, NEBRASKADouglas Street, Omaha, Nebraska

(Address of principal executive offices)

68179

(Zip Code)

(402) 544-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each Class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock (Par Value $2.50 per share)

UNP

New York Stock Exchange Inc.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

þ Yes   ¨ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

¨ Yes   þ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes   ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

þ Yes   ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

§

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Large Accelerated Filer 

þ

Accelerated Filer 

¨

Non-Accelerated Filer 

¨

Smaller Reporting Company 

¨

Emerging Growth Company

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

¨ Yes   þ No

§

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

☐ Yes   ☑ No

§

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☑ Yes   ☐ No

§

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

☑ Yes   ☐ No

§

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

§

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

§

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

☐ Yes   ☑ No

§

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.          ☐

§

As of June 30, 2017, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates (using the New York Stock Exchange closing price) was $87.3 billion.

As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates (using the New York Stock Exchange closing price) was $113.5 billion.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of February 2, 2018January 29, 2021, was 779,305,276.669,829,363.


Documents Incorporated by Reference – Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 10, 2018,13, 2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. The registrant’s Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chairman’s Letter

3

Directors and Senior Management

45

PART I

Item 1.

Business

56

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1011

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

1316

Item 2.

Properties

1417

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

1619

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

1720

Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive Officers of Subsidiaries

1821

PART II

Item 5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

1922

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

2124

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2225

Critical Accounting Policies

3741

Cautionary Information

4245

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4346

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4446

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4547

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

7982

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

7982

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

8083

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

8184

Item 9B.

Other Information

8285

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

8285

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

8285

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

8285

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

8386

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

8386

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

8487

Item 16.

SignaturesForm 10-K Summary

Certifications

8592

Signatures

95Certifications

93

97

2


February 9, 20185, 2021

Fellow Shareholders:

Looking back at 2017, I can report Union Pacific made progress building long-term value for2020 was a year that no one anticipated. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted our four key stakeholders – shareholders, communities,country, economy, and Company in unimaginable ways. Our dedicated employees persevered throughout the year to deliver on our commitments to our customers while maintaining focus on the health and employees. After two consecutive yearssafety of overallthemselves and their families. Despite this monumental challenge, we took another step on our journey to operational excellence. In 2020, we are reporting earnings per share of $7.88, which is a 6% decrease versus 2019, despite volume declines Union Pacific experienced a 2 percent increase in volume. This increase in volume, coupled with positive pricing and continued productivity improvement, generated reported earnings of $13.36 per share.  After adjusting for the impact of corporate tax reform that was passed prior to year-end, our adjusted earnings were a record $5.79 per share*7%. This result is a 14 percent improvement compared to last year’s $5.07 per share.  Our adjusted operating ratio was a record 63.0 percent*59.9%, or 0.50.7 points better than last year’s 63.5 percent.60.6%. These results were negatively impacted by a one-time $278 million non-cash impairment charge that reduced earnings per share by $0.31 and increased operating ratio by 140 basis points.

Carloadings were upUnion Pacific’s goal remains to be the best freight railroad in North America. Our strategy to achieve this goal is driven by a Proud and Engaged Workforce. Recognizing that a diverse workforce provides access to the skills and character we need to foster innovation and drive growth, in 2020 we announced long term goals to increase the representation of women and minorities in our Industrialworkforce. Our employees are at the core of everything we do and critical to our success.

Picture 4To achieve operational excellence, we must provide the Safest and Most Reliable Freight Rail Products and Coal business units 12 percentServices. Our 2020 safety results demonstrate substantial improvement on rail incidents, while we held the line on personal injuries in a very challenging environment. We want our employees to return home safely every day and 6 percent, respectively, driven primarily by a robust increaseto eliminate derailments; our performance in frac sand shipments.  Automotive shipments were down 3 percent resulting from lower domestic sales and reduced vehicle production, while Chemical and Agricultural Product shipments were both down 2 percent as we experienced declines in our crude oil volumes and grain carloadings.  Intermodal volumes were flat compared to 2016.

We faced several operational challenges during 2017, from significant flooding2020 has us moving in the western portionright direction toward that goal.

We also made great strides in 2020 to improve the reliability of our network, to the unprecedented rain and flooding that accompanied Hurricane Harvey.  Despite these challenges, the men and women of Union Pacific worked tirelessly and heroically to safely serve our customers.  I am pleased with our results and look forward to continuing to build long-term enterprise value by building our Value Tracks.

Starting with World Class Safety, 2017 was another outstanding year for employee safety performance.  Our reportable personal injury rate of 0.79 was off slightly from last year’s all-time record low of 0.75.  Our ultimate goal is zero incidents, getting every one of our employees home safely at the end of each day.  We will maintain a relentless focus on data-driven processes and root-cause evaluations, as well as on internal safety programs such as Total Safety Culture and Courage to Care. 

We have built centers of excellence around game-changing technology and other Innovation initiatives. Our Engaged Team is inspiring passion and dedication while leveraging diverse talents to extract the best ideas that will drive positive results across our Company.  The continued implementation and execution of our “Grow to 55 and Zero” initiative drives significant Resource Productivity, from successfully aligning our resources to meet the increase in demand, to being more efficient in virtually everything that we do across the entire organization.

Given the challenges I mentioned above, our service product despite tremendous volume swings as the U.S. economy first shut down, and then reopened. Trip plan compliance for both Intermodal and Manifest/Autos improved 6 points while we also improved freight car velocity 6%, demonstrating how we balanced asset utilization with meeting customer commitments.

Maintaining our focus on Highly Efficient Operations, we took significant steps to manage our assets better in 2017 did not meet2020 as Locomotive and Workforce Productivity improved 14% and 11% year-over-year, respectively. Moving freight in a sustainable manner is tied to efficiency and is a priority for all stakeholders. Every carload of freight we take off the highway saves fuel, lowers emissions, and reduces highway congestion. In 2020, we announced our customers’ expectations, but we kept workingintention to createset science-based targets in accordance with the Paris Agreement to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. We took steps toward that target, reducing our fuel consumption rate by 2% versus 2019.

Combining an Excellentenhanced service product with advancing technology allows us to provide an Industry-Leading Customer Experience, anticipating customer needs, responding quickly, keeping commitments, and offering solutions.  Our robust capital program helps provide the necessary resources and network capacity to build these relationships and prepare for future growth.  It enablesthat is enabling us to handleSecure Appropriate Business. We are the industry leader in providing our business safelycustomers with application programming interfaces (API), with over 30 services launched and efficiently, while improving network fluidity.more to come. These innovative offerings are allowing customers to integrate their systems with ours, creating a more seamless customer experience. We invested about $3.1are winning in the marketplace with this approach as we welcomed new customers to our railroad in the intermodal, agricultural, industrial, and automotive industries, to name a few.

Together, our actions in 2020 position us to generate Best-in-Industry Cash Returns. We paid dividends in 2020 of $2.6 billion, in 2017, including about $1.9 billion in replacement capital to hardenas we maintained our infrastructure, and to improvedividend through the safety and resiliency of our network, as well as nearly $340 million toward completing our Positive Train Control project.

A  Maximized Franchise is much more than our unique physical footprint.  It encompasses our employees’ skills, our assets, and a strategy that emphasizes the importance of our customers’ experiences.  It also embraces a thoughtful approach to market penetration, the competitive landscape to determine future service offerings and to identify trade flow opportunities. 

This successful execution of our value track strategy to the benefit of all our stakeholders translates into value for our shareholders.  Total shareholder return increased 32 percent in 2017, compared with 22 percent for the S&P 500. Our net return on invested capital* of 13.7 percent increased a full percentage point over last year’s 12.7 percent.  We increased our quarterly declared dividend per share by 10 percent, with dividends paid in 2017 totaling $2.0 billion.economic downturn. In addition, we repurchased 3622 million Union Pacific shares.  In total, combining bothshares, decreasing our full-year average share count by 4%. Combining dividends and share repurchases, Union Pacific returned $6$6.3 billion to our shareholders in 2017.2020.

Looking3


In 2020, we remained focused on Optimal Investments as we invested $2.84 billion. We completed 36 siding extensions, focused primarily in our Southern region, to 2018,invest for growth and productivity. Additionally, we continue to invest in energy management systems to reduce fuel consumption. Our new operating model is opening up capacity across our asset base, allowing us to be a more capital efficient business going forward.

While the economic outlook for 2021 remains uncertain, we are optimistic the economy will favor many of the segments whichfocused on building off our solid foundation to drive our core business, leading usefficiency and service to another yearnew heights. We plan to leverage this enhanced service product to drive growth and outpace what the markets naturally provide. We are committed to providing value to all of our stakeholders, understanding that we have a great responsibility to be a positive volume growth.  We will continueforce in sustainability efforts. While the ride may have gotten a little bumpy in 2020, our confidence in our ability to execute on our Value Tracks to benefit our employees, partnerdrive growth and excellent returns has never been greater. Thank you for taking this journey with the communities in which we serve, provide our customers an excellent experience, and generate strong returns for our shareholders.us.

Picture 5

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

*See Item 7 of this report for reconciliations to U.S. GAAP.

34


DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Andrew H. Card, Jr.

Deborah C. Hopkins

Thomas F. McLarty IIIBhavesh V. Patel

Former White House

Former Chief Executive Officer

PresidentChief Executive Officer

Chief of Staff

Citi Ventures

McLarty AssociatesLyondellBasell Industries N.V.

Board Committees: Audit,Compensation

and Benefits, Corporate Governance

Former Chief Innovation Officer

Citi

Board Committees: Finance, (Chair),

Compensation and Benefits

Compensation and BenefitsNominating

CitiBoard Committees: Audit, Finance

Corporate Governance and

Board Committees: Corporate

NominatingJose H. Villarreal

Erroll B. Davis, Jr.William J. DeLaney

Governance and Nominating, FinanceJane H. Lute

Retired Advisor

Former Chairman,

Bhavesh V. Patel

President & CEO

Jane H. Lute

Chief Executive Officer, and

Alliant Energy Corporation

President and Chief Executive Officer

Chairman of the Management Board

Board Committees: Compensation

SICPA North America

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

and Benefits (Chair), Corporate

Board Committees: Audit, Corporate

Board Committees: Finance,

Governance and Nominating

Governance and Nominating

Compensation and Benefits

David B. Dillon

Michael R. McCarthy

Steven R. Rogel

Former Chairman

Chairman

Former Chairman

The Kroger Company

McCarthy Group, LLC

Weyerhaeuser Company

Board Committees: Audit (Chair),

Lead Independent Director

Board Committees: Compensation

Compensation and Benefits

Board Committees: Corporate

and Benefits, Corporate Governance

Governance and Nominating (Chair),

and Nominating

Lance M. Fritz

Finance

Chairman, President and

Jose H. Villarreal

Chief Executive Officer

Michael W. McConnell

Advisor

Union Pacific Corporation and

General Partner and

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, &

Sysco Corporation

SICPA, North America

Feld, LLP

Board Committees: Audit,

Board Committees: Audit, Corporate

Board Committees: Compensation

Compensation and Benefits (Chair)

Governance and Nominating

and Benefits, Corporate Governance

and Nominating

David B. Dillon

Michael R. McCarthy

Former Chairman

Chairman

Christopher J. Williams

The Kroger Company

McCarthy Group, LLC

Chairman

Board Committees: Audit (Chair),

Lead Independent Director

Siebert Williams Shank & Co.

Compensation and Benefits

Board Committees: Corporate

Board Committees: Audit, Finance

Governance and Nominating (Chair),

Lance M. Fritz

Finance

Chairman, President, and

Chief Executive Officer

Thomas F. McLarty III

Union Pacific Corporation and

President

Union Pacific Railroad Company

Former Managing PartnerMcLarty Associates

Feld, LLP

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.Board Committees: Finance (Chair),

Board Committees: Audit,

Board Committees: Audit,  FinanceCorporate Governance and

Compensation and Benefits

Nominating

SENIOR MANAGEMENT*

Lance M. Fritz

Robert M. Knight, Jr.Jennifer L. Hamann

Todd M. RynaskiCraig V. Richardson

Chairman, President, and

Executive Vice President

Vice President and Controller

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

Cameron A. Scott

Bryan L. Clark

Sherrye L. Hutcherson

Executive Vice President and

Vice President-Tax

Senior Vice President and

Chief Operating Officer

Chief Human Resource Officer

Rhonda S. Ferguson

Lynden L. Tennison

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal

Scott D. Moore

Senior Vice President and

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

Officer, and Corporate Secretary

Senior Vice President and

Chief Information Officer

Chief Administrative Officer

D. Lynn KelleyPrentiss W. Bolin, Jr.

Rahul Jalali

Elizabeth F. WhitedKenny G. Rocker

Vice President-External Relations

Senior Vice President-Supply andPresident-Information

Executive Vice President-Marketing

Technologies and Chief Information

and Sales

Bryan L. Clark

Officer

Vice President-Tax

Todd M. Rynaski

Scott D. Moore

Vice President and Controller

Eric J. Gehringer

Senior Vice President-Corporate

Executive Vice President-Operations

Relations and

V. James Vena

Chief Administrative Officer

Senior Advisor

Gary W. Grosz

Vice President and Treasurer

Jon T. Panzer

Elizabeth F. Whited

Senior Vice President-Strategic

Executive Vice President and

Continuous Improvement

Vice President and TreasurerPlanning

Chief MarketingHuman Resource Officer

Michael A. RockClark J. Ponthier

Senior Vice President-External RelationsPresident-Supply Chain

and Continuous Improvement

*Senior management are elected officers of both Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company, except Mr. Scott, Ms. KelleyMessrs. Gehringer, Ponthier, and Ms. WhitedRocker are elected officers for Union Pacific Railroad Company.

.

45


PART I

Item 1. Business

GENERAL

Union Pacific Railroad Company is the principal operating company of Union Pacific Corporation. One of America's most recognized companies, Union Pacific Railroad Company linksconnects 23 states in the western two-thirds of the country by rail, providing a critical link in the global supply chain. The Railroad’s diversified business mix includes Agricultural Products, Automotive, Chemicals, Coal,Bulk, Industrial, Products and Intermodal.Premium. Union Pacific serves many of the fastest-growing U.S. population centers, operates from all major West Coast and Gulf Coast ports to eastern gateways, connects with Canada's rail systems, and is the only railroad serving all six major Mexico gateways. Union Pacific provides value to its roughly 10,000 customers by delivering products in a safe, reliable, fuel-efficient, and environmentally responsible manner.

Union Pacific Corporation was incorporated in Utah in 1969 and maintains its principal executive offices at 1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179. The telephone number at that address is (402) 544-5000. The common stock of Union Pacific Corporation is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “UNP”.

For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to “UPC”, “Corporation”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” shall mean Union Pacific Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Union Pacific Railroad Company, which we separately refer to as “UPRR” or the “Railroad”.

STRATEGY

Union Pacific’s strategy is predicated on being the best freight railroad in North America, which is established through safety, service, reliability, and efficiency. That sets the foundation for growth, which, combined with increasing margins, creates long term enterprise value. We expect to generate growth in three ways – increasing profitable carloads that fit our network and transportation plan; providing more products and services to our customers; and increasing the geographic reach of our franchise.

The “how” also is evident. Operational excellence and an engaged workforce with deep market knowledge and strong customer relationships will result in best-in-class safety, a customer experience that drives growth, and shareholder returns. The following individual strategic elements work together driving Union Pacific forward:

Safest and Most Reliable Freight Rail Products and Services.

Highly Efficient Operations.

Industry-Leading Customer Experience.

Secure Appropriate Business.

Best-in-industry Cash Returns.

Optimal Investment.

Proud and Engaged Workforce.

As we transform our railroad into the safest, most reliable, and most efficient in North America, our values will continue guiding us: Our passion for performance will help us win; our high ethical standards will ensure we do not win at the expense of any one stakeholder; and our teamwork will make sure we win together.

To assist us in accomplishing our goal of being the best freight railroad in North America, we announced our efficiency and business growth initiative of G55+0 (grow to an operating ratio of 55 with zero injuries), which was launched in late 2015. Additionally, beginning in October 2018, we began conversion to precision scheduled railroading (PSR) in an effort to streamline operations with four principles:

1.Shift the focus of operations from moving trains to moving cars.

2.Minimize car dwell, car classification events, and locomotive power requirements.

3.Utilize general-purpose trains by blending existing train service.

4.Balance train movements to improve the utilization of crews and rail assets.

6


We want to move cars faster, reducing the number of times each is touched, resulting in terminal consolidation opportunities, improved asset utilization, and fewer car classifications, allowing product to get to the market quicker and more reliably. The end result is we are delivering a better customer experience, which will enable us to grow our market share.

OPERATIONS

The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable operating segment. Although we provide revenue by commodity group, we analyze the net financial results of the Railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network. Additional information regarding our business and operations, including revenues, financial information and data, and other information regarding environmental matters, is presented in Risk Factors, Item 1A; Legal Proceedings, Item 3; Selected Financial Data, Item 6; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7; and the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8 (which include information regarding revenues, statements of income, and total assets). 

OperationsUPRR is a Class I railroad operating in the U.S. We have 32,313 route miles, connecting Pacific Coast and Gulf Coast ports with the Midwest and eastern U.S. gateways and providing several corridors to key Mexican gateways. We serve the Western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers to move freight to and from the Atlantic Coast, the Pacific Coast, the Southeast, the Southwest, Canada, and Mexico. Export and import traffic moves through Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast ports and across the Mexican and Canadian borders. In 2020, we generated freight revenues totaling $18.3 billion from the following three commodity groups:

2020 Freight Revenue

Picture 1

Bulk – The Company's Bulk shipments consist of grain and grain products, fertilizer, food and refrigerated, and coal and renewables. In 2020, this group generated 33% of our freight revenue. We access most major grain markets, connecting the Midwest and Western U.S. producing areas to export terminals in the Pacific Northwest and Gulf Coast ports, as well as Mexico. We also serve significant domestic markets, including grain processors, animal feeders, and ethanol producers in the Midwest and West. Fertilizer movements originate in the Gulf Coast region, Midwest, western U.S., and Canada (through interline access) for delivery to major agricultural users in those areas as well as abroad. The Railroad’s network supports the transportation of coal shipments to independent and regulated power companies and industrial facilities throughout the U.S. Through interchange gateways and ports, UPRR’s reach extends to eastern U.S. utilities as well as to Mexico and other international destinations. Coal traffic originating in the Powder River Basin (PRB) area of Wyoming is the largest segment of the Railroad’s coal business. Renewable shipments for customers committed to sustainability consist primarily of biomass exports and wind turbine components.

Industrial – Our extensive network facilitates the movement of numerous commodities between thousands of origin and destination points throughout North America. The Industrial group consists of several categories, including construction, industrial chemicals, plastics, forest products, specialized products (primarily waste, salt, roofing, and government), metals and ores, petroleum, liquid petroleum gases (LPG), and soda ash. Transportation of these products accounted for 36% of our freight revenue in 2020. Commercial, residential, and governmental infrastructure investments drive shipments of steel, aggregates, cement, and wood products. Industrial and light manufacturing plants receive steel, nonferrous materials, minerals, and other raw materials.

The industrial chemicals market consists of a vast number of chemical compounds that support the manufacturing of more complex chemicals. Plastics shipments support automotive, housing, and the durable and disposable consumer goods markets. Forest product shipments include lumber and paper commodities. Lumber shipments originate primarily in the Pacific Northwest or western Canada and move

7


throughout the U.S. for use in new home construction and repairs and remodeling. Paper shipments primarily support packaging needs. Oil and gas drilling generates demand for raw steel, finished pipe, stone, and drilling fluid commodities. The Company’s petroleum and LPG shipments are primarily impacted by refinery utilization rates, regional crude pricing differentials, pipeline capacity, and the use of asphalt for road programs. Soda ash originates in southwestern Wyoming and California, destined for chemical and glass producing markets in North America and abroad.

Premium – In 2020, Premium shipments generated 31% of Union Pacific’s total freight revenue. Premium includes finished automobiles, automotive parts, and merchandise in intermodal containers, both domestic and international. International business consists of import and export traffic moving in 20 or 40-foot shipping containers, that mainly pass through West Coast ports served by UP’s extensive terminal network. Domestic business includes container and trailer traffic picked up and delivered within North America for intermodal marketing companies (primarily shipper agents and logistics companies) as well as truckload carriers.

We are the largest automotive carrier west of the Mississippi River and operate or access 38 vehicle distribution centers. The Railroad’s extensive franchise serves five vehicle assembly plants and connects to West Coast ports, all six major Mexico gateways, and the Port of Houston to accommodate both import and export shipments. In addition to transporting finished vehicles, UPRR provides expedited handling of automotive parts in both boxcars and intermodal containers destined for Mexico, the U.S., and Canada.

Seasonality – Some of the commodities we carry have peak shipping seasons, reflecting either or both the nature of the commodity and the demand cycle for the commodity (such as certain agricultural and food products that have specific growing and harvesting seasons). The peak shipping seasons for these commodities can vary considerably each year depending upon various factors, including the strength of domestic and international economies and currencies and the strength of harvests and market prices for agricultural products.

Proud & Engaged Workforce – We recruit and develop talented individuals dedicated to our mission of service and who are passionate about performing to the best of their abilities while working as one team. We recognize and value that people come from all backgrounds and walks of life, and we value diversity. Union Pacific wants employees from all groups to launch and grow their career within the Company.

Attracting, acquiring, and maintaining a diverse workforce provides access to the skills and character we need to foster innovative ideas and drive optimal business growth. Drawing on different experiences and expertise is critical for strategic decision-making, problem-solving, leadership development, and creativity.

Union Pacific’s commitment – today and for the long run, is to further improve and strengthen performance through an inclusive workforce that reflects the diverse markets and communities we serve. Recognizing we still have work to do, we continue to focus on building an inclusive culture and a talented workforce and marketplace with a goal to reach 40% minority and 11% female representation in total for the Company by 2030. As of December 31, 2020, workforce representation of minorities and females was approximately 30% and 6%, respectively.

Safety is Union Pacific’s first priority. We continue to improve technology, enhance processes, and foster a culture focused on operating safely as well as remaining focused on identifying and managing risks and training our employees. Our success is measured by our personal injury rate (the number of reportable injuries for every 200,000 employee-hours worked), and our equipment incident rate (the number of reportable equipment incidents per million train miles). We provide both measures to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Personal injuries are defined as on duty incidents or occupational illnesses that require employees to lose time away from work, modify their normal duties, or receive certain types of medical treatment. Equipment incidents are defined as any occurrence that causes damage to assets above the monetary reporting threshold regardless of ownership ($10,700 for 2020 and $11,200 for 2021).

Our goal is to have every employee return home safely every day. Unfortunately, our 2020 personal injury rate of 0.90 and equipment incident rate of 3.54 illustrates that we have not met our ultimate goal of an incident free environment. Our 2020 personal injury rate was flat and our equipment incident rate improved 17% versus 2019. (See further discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, of this report.)

Providing employees with fulfilling, family-supporting careers is important to us. We offer competitive compensation to our employees and leadership. Our Board of Directors evaluates our compensation plans

8


and reviews recommendations from the Compensation and Benefits Committee. The median annual compensation for all our employees who were employed as of December 31, 2020, was $77,778 (excluding the CEO).

Approximately 83% of our full-time employees are represented by 13 major rail unions. Pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (RLA), our collective bargaining agreements are subject to modification every five years. The RLA procedures include mediation, potential arbitration, cooling-off periods, and the possibility of Presidential Emergency Boards and Congressional intervention. The current round of negotiations began on January 1, 2020, related to years 2020-2024. Contract negotiations historically continue for an extended period of time, and work stoppages during negotiations are rare (see “Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect Our Operations” in the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report).

Railroad Security – Our security efforts consist of a wide variety of measures, including employee training, engagement with our customers, training of emergency responders, and partnerships with numerous federal, state, and local government agencies. While federal law requires us to protect the confidentiality of our security plans designed to safeguard against terrorism and other security incidents, the following provides a general overview of our security initiatives.

UPRR Security Measures – We maintain a comprehensive security plan designed to both deter and respond to any potential or actual threats as they arise. The plan includes four levels of alert status, each with its own set of countermeasures. We employ our own police force, consisting of commissioned and highly-trained officers. The police are certified state law enforcement officers with investigative and arrest powers. The Union Pacific Police Department has achieved accreditation under the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc. (CALEA) for complying with the highest law enforcement standards. Our employees also undergo recurrent security and preparedness training as well as federally-mandated hazardous materials and security training. We regularly review the sufficiency of our employee training programs. We maintain the capability to move critical operations to back-up facilities in different locations.

We operate an emergency response management center 24 hours a day. The center receives reports of emergencies, dangerous or potentially dangerous conditions, and other safety and security issues from our employees, the public, law enforcement, and other government officials. In cooperation with government officials, we monitor both threats and public events, and, as necessary, we may alter rail traffic flow at times of concern to minimize risk to communities and our operations. We comply with the hazardous materials routing rules and other requirements imposed by federal law. We also design our operating plan to expedite the movement of hazardous material shipments to minimize the time rail cars remain idle at yards and terminals located in or near major population centers. Additionally, in compliance with Transportation Security Agency regulations, we deployed information systems and instructed employees in tracking and documenting the handoff of Rail Security Sensitive Materials with customers and interchange partners.

We also have established a number of our own innovative safety and security-oriented initiatives ranging from various investments in technology to The Officer on Train program, which provides local law enforcement officers with the opportunity to ride with train crews to enhance their understanding of railroad operations and risks. Our staff of information security professionals continually assesses cyber security risks and implements mitigation programs that evolve with the changing technology threat environment. To date, we have not experienced any material disruption of our operations due to a cyber threat or attack directed at us. We also evaluated details regarding the SolarWinds supply chain attack, and do not believe our systems were affected.

Cooperation with Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies – We work closely on physical and cyber security initiatives with government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as well as local police departments, fire departments, and other first responders. In conjunction with the Association of American Railroads (AAR), we sponsor Ask Rail, a mobile application which provides first responders with secure links to electronic information, including commodity and emergency response information required by emergency personnel to respond to accidents and other situations. We also participate in the National Joint Terrorism Task Force, a multi-agency effort established by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to combat and prevent terrorism.

We work with the Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Military Transport Management Command, which monitor shipments entering the UPRR rail network at U.S. border crossings and ports. We were the first railroad in the U.S. to be named a partner in CBP’s Customs-Trade Partnership

9


Against Terrorism, a partnership designed to develop, enhance, and maintain effective security processes throughout the global supply chain.

Cooperation with Customers and Trade Associations – Through TransCAER (Transportation Community Awareness and Emergency Response), we work with the AAR, the American Chemistry Council, the American Petroleum Institute, and other chemical trade groups to provide communities with preparedness tools, including the training of emergency responders. In cooperation with the FRA and other interested groups, we are also working to develop additional improvements to tank car design that will further limit the risk of releases of hazardous materials.

Competition – see “We Face Competition from Other Railroads and Other Transportation Providers” in the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report.

Key Suppliers – see “We Are Dependent on Certain Key Suppliers of Locomotives and Rail” in the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report.

Available Information – Our Internet website is www.up.com. We make available free of charge on our website (under the “Investors” caption link) our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) documents; our current reports on Form 8-K; our proxy statements; Forms 3, 4, and 5, filed on behalf of our directors and certain executive officers; and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). We provide these reports and statements as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We also make available on our website previously filed SEC reports and exhibits via a link to EDGAR on the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov. Additionally, our corporate governance materials, including By-Laws, Board Committee charters, governance guidelines and policies, and codes of conduct and ethics for directors, officers, and employees are available on our website. From time to time, the corporate governance materials on our website may be updated as necessary to comply with rules issued by the SEC and the NYSE or as desirable to promote the effective and efficient governance of our Company. Any security holder wishing to receive, without charge, a copy of any of our SEC filings or corporate governance materials should send a written request to: Secretary, Union Pacific Corporation, 1400 Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179.

We have included the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) certifications regarding our public disclosure required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31(a) and (b) to this report.

References to our website address in this report, including references in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, are provided as a convenience and do not constitute, and should not be deemed, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on, or available through, the website. Therefore, such information should not be considered part of this report.

OPERATIONS

The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable operating segment. Although we provide revenue by commodity group, we analyze the net financial results of the Railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network. Additional information regarding our business and operations, including revenue and financial information and data and other information regarding environmental matters, is presented in Risk Factors, Item 1A; Legal Proceedings, Item 3; Selected Financial Data, Item 6; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7; and the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8 (which include information regarding revenues, statements of income, and total assets). 

5


Operations  –UPRR is a Class I railroad operating in the U.S. We have 32,122 route miles, linking Pacific Coast and Gulf Coast ports with the Midwest and eastern U.S. gateways and providing several corridors to key Mexican gateways. We serve the Western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers to move freight to and from the Atlantic Coast, the Pacific Coast, the Southeast, the Southwest, Canada, and Mexico. Export and import traffic moves through Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast ports and across the Mexican and Canadian borders. Our freight traffic consists of bulk,

2017 Freight Revenue

manifest, and premium business. Bulk traffic primarily consists of coal, grain, soda ash, ethanol, rock and crude oil shipped in unit trains – trains transporting a single commodity from one origin to one destination. Manifest traffic includes individual carload or less than train-load business involving commodities such as lumber, steel, paper, food and chemicals. The transportation of finished vehicles, auto parts, intermodal containers and truck trailers are included as part of our premium business. In 2017, we generated freight revenues totaling $19.8 billion from the following six commodity groups:

Agricultural Products – Transportation of grains, commodities produced from these grains, and food and beverage products generated 19% of the Railroad’s 2017 freight revenue. We access most major grain markets, linking the Midwest and Western U.S. producing areas to export terminals in the Pacific Northwest and Gulf Coast ports, as well as Mexico. We also serve significant domestic markets, including grain processors, animal feeders and ethanol producers in the Midwest, West, South and Rocky Mountain states. Unit trains, which transport a single commodity between producers and export terminals or domestic markets, represent approximately 41% of our agricultural shipments.

Automotive – We are the largest automotive carrier west of the Mississippi River and operate or access 38 vehicle distribution centers. The Railroad’s extensive franchise serves five vehicle assembly plants and connects to West Coast ports, all six major Mexico gateways, and the Port of Houston to accommodate both import and export shipments. In addition to transporting finished vehicles, UPRR provides expedited handling of automotive parts in both boxcars and intermodal containers destined for Mexico, the U.S. and Canada. The automotive group generated 10% of Union Pacific’s freight revenue in 2017.

Chemicals – Transporting chemicals generated 18% of our freight revenue in 2017. The Railroad’s unique franchise serves the chemical producing areas along the Gulf Coast, where roughly 55% of the Company’s chemical business originates, travels through, or terminates. Our chemical franchise also accesses chemical producers in the Rocky Mountains and on the West Coast. The Company’s chemical shipments include six categories:  industrial chemicals, plastics, fertilizer, petroleum and liquid petroleum gases, crude oil and soda ash. Currently, these products move primarily to and from the Gulf Coast region. Fertilizer movements originate in the Gulf Coast region, the western U.S. and Canada (through interline access) for delivery to major agricultural users in the Midwest, western U.S., as well as abroad. Soda ash originates in southwestern Wyoming and California, destined for chemical and glass producing markets in North America and abroad.

Coal – Shipments of coal, petroleum coke, and biomass accounted for 13% of our freight revenue in 2017. The Railroad’s network supports the transportation of coal, petroleum coke, and biomass to independent and regulated power companies and industrial facilities throughout the U.S. Through interchange gateways and ports, UPRR’s reach extends to eastern U.S. utilities, as well as to Mexico and other international destinations. Coal traffic originating in the Powder River Basin (PRB) area of Wyoming is the largest segment of the Railroad’s coal business.

Industrial Products – Our extensive network facilitates the movement of numerous commodities between thousands of origin and destination points throughout North America. The Industrial Products group consists of several categories, including construction products, minerals, consumer goods, metals, lumber, paper, and other miscellaneous products.  In 2017, this group generated 21% of our total freight revenue. Commercial, residential and governmental infrastructure investments drive shipments of steel, aggregates (cement components), cement and wood products.  Oil and gas drilling generates demand for raw steel, finished pipe, frac sand, stone and drilling fluid commodities. Industrial and light manufacturing plants

6


receive steel, nonferrous materials, minerals and other raw materials. Paper and packaging commodities, as well as appliances, move to major metropolitan areas for consumers. Lumber shipments originate primarily in the Pacific Northwest and western Canada and move throughout the U.S. for use in new home construction and repair and remodeling.

Intermodal – Our Intermodal business includes two segments: international and domestic. International business consists of import and export container traffic that mainly passes through West Coast ports served by UPRR’s extensive terminal network. Domestic business includes container and trailer traffic picked up and delivered within North America for intermodal marketing companies (primarily shipper agents and logistics companies), as well as truckload carriers. Less-than-truckload and package carriers with time-sensitive business requirements are also an important part of domestic shipments. Together, our international and domestic Intermodal business generated 19% of our 2017 freight revenue.

Seasonality – Some of the commodities we carry have peak shipping seasons, reflecting either or both the nature of the commodity and the demand cycle for the commodity (such as certain agricultural and food products that have specific growing and harvesting seasons). The peak shipping seasons for these commodities can vary considerably each year depending upon various factors, including the strength of domestic and international economies and currencies and the strength of harvests and market prices for agricultural products.

Working Capital – At December 31, 2017, we had a working capital surplus. We maintain adequate resources, and when necessary, have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements, in addition to sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities. At December 31, 2016, we had a working capital deficit, due primarily to a decrease in other current assets related to a tax receivable for the late extension of bonus depreciation at December 31, 2015, along with an increase at December 31, 2016, in accounts payable and upcoming debt maturities.

Competition – We are subject to competition from other railroads, motor carriers, ship and barge operators, and pipelines. Our main railroad competitor is Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC. Its primary subsidiary, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), operates parallel routes in many of our main traffic corridors. In addition, we operate in corridors served by other railroads and motor carriers. Motor carrier competition exists for five of our six commodity groups (excluding most coal shipments). Because of the proximity of our routes to major inland and Gulf Coast waterways, barges can be particularly competitive, especially for grain and bulk commodities in certain areas where we operate. In addition to price competition, we face competition with respect to transit times, quality and reliability of service from motor carriers and other railroads. Motor carriers in particular can have an advantage over railroads with respect to transit times and timeliness of service.  However, railroads are much more fuel-efficient than trucks, which reduces the impact of transporting goods on the environment and public infrastructure, and we have been making efforts to convert certain truck traffic to rail.  Additionally, we must build or acquire and maintain our rail system; trucks and barges are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any of the following could also affect the competitiveness of our transportation services for some or all of our commodities: (i) improvements or expenditures materially increasing the quality or reducing the costs of these alternative modes of transportation, (ii) legislation that eliminates or significantly increases the size or weight limitations applied to motor carriers, or (iii) legislation or regulatory changes that impose operating restrictions on railroads or that adversely affect the profitability of some or all railroad traffic. Finally, many movements face product or geographic competition where our customers can use different products (e.g. natural gas instead of coal, sorghum instead of corn) or commodities from different locations (e.g. grain from states or countries that we do not serve, crude oil from different regions). Sourcing different commodities or different locations allows shippers to substitute different carriers and such competition may reduce our volume or constrain prices. For more information regarding risks we face from competition, see the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report.

Key Suppliers – We depend on two key domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives. Both suppliers provide parts for locomotives and one also provides maintenance under a service agreement. Due to the capital intensive nature of the locomotive manufacturing business and sophistication of this equipment, potential new suppliers face high barriers of entry into this industry. Therefore, if one of these domestic suppliers discontinues manufacturing locomotives, supplying parts or providing maintenance for any reason, including insolvency or bankruptcy, we could experience a significant cost increase and risk reduced availability of the locomotives that are necessary to our operations. Additionally, for a high percentage of our rail purchases, we utilize two steel producers (one domestic and one international) that meet our specifications. Rail is critical for maintenance, replacement, improvement, and expansion of our network and facilities. Rail manufacturing also has high barriers of entry, and, if one of those suppliers

7


discontinues operations for any reason, including insolvency or bankruptcy, we could experience cost increases and difficulty obtaining rail.

Employees – Approximately 85% of our 41,992 full-time-equivalent employees are represented by 14 major rail unions. On January 1, 2015, current labor agreements became subject to modification and we began the current round of negotiations with the unions. Existing agreements remain in effect until new agreements are ratified or the Railway Labor Act’s (RLA) procedures (which include mediation, potential arbitration, cooling-off periods, and the possibility of Presidential Emergency Boards and Congressional intervention) are exhausted. Through industry and local negotiations, UPRR reached tentative new agreements with 12 of our 14 major rail unions. Nine unions (representing nearly 70% of our agreement work force) have ratified those agreements by significant margins. The tentative agreement failed ratification with two unions in early February 2018 (representing about 10% of our agreement work force) returning any further discussions with them to the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board. Another small union (less than 1%) is still out for ratification. UPRR and the industry currently continue in active mediation with the remaining coalition of two unions (representing about 20% of our agreement work force).  Under the Railway Labor Act, the National Mediation Board controls timing and location of mediation conferences and when to terminate mediation, moving the parties to the next stages of the RLA process.  Contract negotiations historically continue for an extended period of time and we rarely experience work stoppages while negotiations are pending.

Railroad Security – Our security efforts consist of a wide variety of measures including employee training, engagement with our customers, training of emergency responders, and partnerships with numerous federal, state, and local government agencies.  While federal law requires us to protect the confidentiality of our security plans designed to safeguard against terrorism and other security incidents, the following provides a general overview of our security initiatives. 

UPRR Security Measures – We maintain a comprehensive security plan designed to both deter and respond to any potential or actual threats as they arise.  The plan includes four levels of alert status, each with its own set of countermeasures.  We employ our own police force, consisting of more than 250 commissioned and highly-trained officers. Our employees also undergo recurrent security and preparedness training, as well as federally-mandated hazardous materials and security training. We regularly review the sufficiency of our employee training programs. We maintain the capability to move critical operations to back-up facilities in different locations.

We operate an emergency response management center 24 hours a day.  The center receives reports of emergencies, dangerous or potentially dangerous conditions, and other safety and security issues from our employees, the public, law enforcement and other government officials.  In cooperation with government officials, we monitor both threats and public events, and, as necessary, we may alter rail traffic flow at times of concern to minimize risk to communities and our operations.  We comply with the hazardous materials routing rules and other requirements imposed by federal law.  We also design our operating plan to expedite the movement of hazardous material shipments to minimize the time rail cars remain idle at yards and terminals located in or near major population centers.  Additionally, in compliance with Transportation Security Agency regulations, we deployed information systems and instructed employees in tracking and documenting the handoff of Rail Security Sensitive Materials with customers and interchange partners.

We also have established a number of our own innovative safety and security-oriented initiatives ranging from various investments in technology to The Officer on Train program, which provides local law enforcement officers with the opportunity to ride with train crews to enhance their understanding of railroad operations and risks. Our staff of information security professionals continually assesses cyber security risks and implements mitigation programs that evolve with the changing technology threat environment. To date, we have not experienced any material disruption of our operations due to a cyber threat or attack directed at us.

Cooperation with Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies – We work closely on physical and cyber security initiatives with government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as well as local police departments, fire departments, and other first responders.  In conjunction with the Association of American Railroads (AAR), we sponsor Ask Rail, a mobile application which provides first responders with secure links to electronic information, including commodity and emergency response information required by emergency personnel to respond to accidents and other situations.  We also participate in the National Joint Terrorism Task Force, a multi-agency effort established by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to combat and prevent terrorism. 

8


We work with the Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Military Transport Management Command, which monitor shipments entering the UPRR rail network at U.S. border crossings and ports.  We were the first railroad in the U.S. to be named a partner in CBP’s Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism, a partnership designed to develop, enhance, and maintain effective security processes throughout the global supply chain.

Cooperation with Customers and Trade Associations –  Through TransCAER (Transportation Community Awareness and Emergency Response) we work with the AAR, the American Chemistry Council, the American Petroleum Institute, and other chemical trade groups to provide communities with preparedness tools, including the training of emergency responders.  In cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and other interested groups, we are also working to develop additional improvements to tank car design that will further limit the risk of releases of hazardous materials.

GOVERNMENTAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

Governmental Regulation – Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, and local regulations, generally applicable to all businesses. (See also the discussion of certain regulatory proceedings in Legal Proceedings, Item 3.)

The operations of the Railroad are also subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The STB has jurisdiction over rates charged on certain regulated rail traffic; common carrier service of regulated traffic; freight car compensation; transfer, extension, or abandonment of rail lines; and acquisition of control of rail common carriers. The STB continues its efforts to explore expanding rail regulation and is reviewing proposed rulemaking in various areas, including reciprocal switching, commodity exemptions, and expanding and easing procedures for smaller rate complaints. The STB also continues to develop a methodology for determining railroad revenue adequacy and the possible use of a revenue adequacy constraint in regulating railroad rates. The STB posts quarterly reports on rate reasonableness cases and maintains a database on service complaints, and has the authority to initiate investigations, among other things.

The operations of the Railroad also are subject to the regulations of the FRA and other federal and state agencies. In 2010, the FRA issued initial rules governing installation of Positive Train Control (PTC) that now has. PTC is a deadlinesafety technology intended to prevent certain accidents caused by human error, such as train-to-train collisions, derailments caused by overspeed, movement of December 31, 2018.a train through a misaligned switch, and unauthorized movement of trains into work zones. The Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2015 amended the Rail Safety Improvement Act to require implementation of PTC implementation deadline may beby the end of 2018, which was extended to December 31, 2020. On December 10, 2018, we received FRA approval for an alternative schedule to implement, test, and refine our PTC system during 2019-2020. As of December 31, 2020, provided certainPTC

10


has been implemented and installed on 100 percent of our required rail lines, including required passenger train routes, and interoperability has been established with all other criteria are satisfied. PTC is a collision avoidance technology intended to override engineer controlled locomotiveshost and stop train-to-train and overspeed accidents, misaligned switch derailments, and unauthorized entry to work zones. Final implementation of PTC will require us to adapt and integrate our system with other railroads whose implementation plan may be different than ours.tenant railroads. Through 2017,2020, we have invested approximately $2.6$2.9 billion in the implementation and ongoing development of PTC. We are now moving to further leverage the PTC system through development and implementation of new operating technologies, such as fuel and in-train forces management systems.

DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, and DHS, along with other federal agencies, have jurisdiction over certain aspects of safety, movement of hazardous materials and hazardous waste, emissions requirements, and equipment standards. Additionally, various state and local agencies have jurisdiction over disposal of hazardous waste and seek to regulate movement of hazardous materials in ways not preempted by federal law.

Environmental Regulation – We are subject to extensive federal and state environmental statutes and regulations pertaining to public health and the environment. The statutes and regulations are administered and monitored by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and by various state environmental agencies. The primary laws affecting our operations are the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, regulating the management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, regulating the cleanup of contaminated properties; the Clean Air Act, regulating air emissions; and the Clean Water Act, regulating waste water discharges.

Information concerning environmental claims and contingencies and estimated remediation costs is set forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental, Item 7, and Note 1817 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

9


Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following discussion addresses significant factors, events, and uncertainties that make an investment in our securities risky and provides important information for the understanding of our “forward-looking statements,” which are discussed immediately preceding Item 7A of this Form 10-K and elsewhere. The risk factors set forth in this Item 1A should be read in conjunction with the rest of the information included in this report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8.

We urge you to consider carefully the factors described below and the risks that they present for our operations as well as the risks addressed in other reports and materials that we file with the SEC and the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. When the factors, events, and contingencies described below or elsewhere in this Form 10-K materialize, our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or prospects can be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects.

Strategic and Operational Risks

We Must Manage Fluctuating Demand for Our Services and Network Capacity – If there are significant reductions in demand for rail services with respect to one or more commodities or changes in consumer preferences that affect the businesses of our customers, we may experience increased costs associated with resizing our operations, including higher unit operating costs and costs for the storage of locomotives, rail cars, and other equipment; work-force adjustments; and other related activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. If there is significant demand for our services that exceeds the designed capacity of our network, we may experience network difficulties, including congestion and reduced velocity, that could compromise the level of service we provide to our customers. This level of demand may also compound the impact of weather and weather-related events on our operations and velocity. Although we continue to improve our transportation plan, add capacity, improve operations at our yards and other facilities, and improve our ability to address surges in demand for any reason with adequate resources, we cannot be sure that these measures will fully or adequately address any service shortcomings resulting from demand exceeding our planned capacity. We may experience other operational or service difficulties related to network capacity, dramatic and unplanned fluctuations in our customers’ demand for rail service with respect to one or more commodities or operating

11


regions, or other events that could negatively impact our operational efficiency, any of which could all have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We Transport Hazardous Materials – We transport certain hazardous materials and other materials, including crude oil, ethanol, and toxic inhalation hazard (TIH) materials, such as chlorine, that pose certain risks in the event of a release or combustion. Additionally, U.S. laws impose common carrier obligations on railroads that require us to transport certain hazardous materials regardless of risk or potential exposure to loss. A rail accident or other incident or accident on our network, at our facilities, or at the facilities of our customers involving the release or combustion of hazardous materials could involve significant costs and claims for personal injury, property damage, and environmental penalties and remediation in excess of our insurance coverage for these risks, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We Rely on Technology and Technology Improvements in Our Business Operations – We rely on information technology in all aspects of our business, including technology systems operated by us or under control of third parties. If we do not have sufficient capital to acquire, develop, or implement new technology or maintain or upgrade current systems, such as PTC or the latest version of our transportation control systems, we may suffer a competitive disadvantage within the rail industry and with companies providing other modes of transportation service, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We Are Subject to Cybersecurity Risks – We rely on information technology in all aspects of our business, including technology systems operated by us or under control of third parties. Although we devote significant resources to protect our technology systems and proprietary data, we have experienced and will continue to experience varying degrees of cyber incidents in the normal course of business. While there can be no assurance that the systems we have designed to prevent or limit the effects of cyber incidents or attacks will be sufficient to prevent or detect such incidents or attacks, or to avoid a material adverse impact on our systems after such incidents or attacks do occur, we are continually evaluating attackers’ techniques and tactics, and we are diligent in our monitoring, training, planning, and prevention. However, due to the rising rates and increasing sophistication of cyber-attacks, an increasingly complex IT supply chain, and the nature of zero-day exploits, we may be unable to anticipate or implement adequate preventative measures to prevent a security breach, including by ransomware, human error, or other cyber-attack methods, from disrupting our systems or the systems of third parties. A successful cyber-attack may result in significant service interruption; safety failure; other operational difficulties; unauthorized access to (or the loss of access to) competitively sensitive, confidential, or other critical data or systems; loss of customers; financial losses; regulatory fines; and misuse or corruption of critical data and proprietary information, which could all have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. We also may experience security breaches that could remain undetected for an extended period and, therefore, have a greater impact on the services we offer.

Severe Weather Could Result in Significant Business Interruptions and Expenditures – As a railroad with a vast network, we are exposed to severe weather conditions and other natural phenomena, including earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods, mudslides or landslides, extreme temperatures, avalanches, and significant precipitation. Line outages and other interruptions caused by these conditions can adversely affect our entire rail network, potentially negatively affecting revenue, costs, and liabilities, despite efforts we undertake to plan for these events. Our revenues can also be adversely affected by severe weather that causes damage and disruptions to our customers. These impacts caused by severe weather could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

A Significant Portion of Our Revenue Involves Transportation of Commodities to and from International Markets – Although revenues from our operations are attributable to transportation services provided in the U.S., a significant portion of our revenues involves the transportation of commodities to and from international markets, including Mexico, Canada, and Southeast Asia, by various carriers and, at times, various modes of transportation. Significant and sustained interruptions of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia, including China, could adversely affect customers and other entities that, directly or indirectly, purchase or rely on rail transportation services in the U.S. as part of their operations, and any such interruptions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Any one or more of the following could cause a significant and sustained interruption of trade with Mexico, Canada, or countries in Southeast Asia: (a) a deterioration of security for international trade and businesses; (b) the adverse impact of new laws, rules, and regulations or the interpretation of laws, rules, and regulations by government entities, courts, or regulatory bodies, including the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and a “Phase One” trade agreement with China; (c) actions

12


of taxing authorities that affect our customers doing business in foreign countries; (d) any significant adverse economic developments, such as extended periods of high inflation, material disruptions in the banking sector or in the capital markets of these foreign countries, and significant changes in the valuation of the currencies of these foreign countries that could materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (e) shifts in patterns of international trade that adversely affect import and export markets; (f) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries; and (g) public health crises, including the outbreak of pandemic or contagious disease, such as the novel coronavirus and its variant strains.

We Are Dependent on Certain Key Suppliers of Locomotives and Rail – Due to the capital intensive nature and sophistication of locomotive equipment, parts, and maintenance, potential new suppliers face high barriers to entry. Therefore, if one of the domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives discontinues manufacturing locomotives, supplying parts or providing maintenance for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience significant cost increases and reduced availability of the locomotives that are necessary for our operations. Additionally, for a high percentage of our rail purchases, we utilize two steel producers (one domestic and one international) that meet our specifications. Rail is critical to our operations for rail replacement programs, maintenance, and for adding additional network capacity, new rail and storage yards, and expansions of existing facilities. This industry similarly has high barriers to entry, and if one of these suppliers discontinues operations for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience both significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail for maintenance and other projects. Changes to trade agreements or policies that result in increased tariffs on goods imported into the United States could also result in significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail.

Human Capital Risks

Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect Our Operations – The U.S. Class I railroads are party to collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions. The majority of our employees belong to labor unions and are subject to these agreements. Disputes with regard to the terms of these agreements or our potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions could result in, among other things, strikes, work stoppages, slowdowns, or lockouts, which could cause a significant disruption of our operations and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Additionally, future national labor agreements, or renegotiation of labor agreements or provisions of labor agreements, could compromise our service reliability or significantly increase our costs for health care, wages, and other benefits, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Labor disputes, work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts at loading/unloading facilities, ports, or other transport access points could compromise our service reliability and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Labor disputes, work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts by employees of our customers or our suppliers could compromise our service reliability and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

The Availability of Qualified Personnel Could Adversely Affect Our Operations – Changes in demographics, training requirements, and the availability of qualified personnel, including the effects on availability from pandemic illnesses or restrictions, could negatively affect our ability to meet demand for rail service. Unpredictable increases in demand for rail services and a lack of network fluidity may exacerbate such risks, which could have a negative impact on our operational efficiency and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Legal and Regulatory Risks

We Are Subject to Significant Governmental Regulation – We are subject to governmental regulation by a significant number of federal, state, and local authorities covering a variety of health, safety, labor, environmental, economic (as discussed below), tax, and other matters. Many laws and regulations require us to obtain and maintain various licenses, permits, and other authorizations, and we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to do so. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on us. Governments or regulators may change the legislative or regulatory frameworks within which we operate without providing us any recourse to address any adverse effects on our business, including, without limitation, regulatory determinations or rules regarding dispute resolution, increasing the amount of our traffic subject to common carrier regulation, business relationships with other railroads, calculation of our cost of capital or other inputs relevant to computing our revenue adequacy, the prices we charge, changes in tax rates, enactment of new tax laws, and costs and expenses.revision in tax regulations. Significant legislative activity in Congress or regulatory activity by the STB could expand regulation of

13


railroad operations and prices for rail services, which could reduce capital spending on our rail network, facilities, and equipment, and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. As part ofFor example, enacted federal legislation mandated the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, rail carriers were to implement PTC by the end of 2015 (the Rail Safety Improvement Act).  The Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2015 amended the Rail Safety Improvement Act to require implementation of PTC technology by the end of 2018, which deadline may be extended to December 31, 2020, provided certain other criteria are satisfied.  Final implementation of PTC will require uswhich we invested approximately $2.9 billion to adapt and integrate our system with other railroads whose implementation plan may be different than ours.  This implementation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.develop. Additionally, one or more consolidations of Class I railroads also could also lead to increased regulation of the rail industry.

We May Be Affected by General Economic Conditions – Prolonged severe adverse domestic and global economic conditions or disruptions of financial and credit markets may affect the producers and consumers of the commodities we carry and may have a material adverse effect on our access to liquidity and our results of operations and financial condition.

10


We Face Competition from Other Railroads and Other Transportation Providers – We face competition from other railroads, motor carriers, ships, barges, and pipelines. In addition to price competition, we face competition with respect to transit times and quality and reliability of service. We must build or acquire and maintain our rail system, while trucks, barges and maritime operators are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any future improvements or expenditures materially increasing the quality or reducing the cost of alternative modes of transportation, or legislation that eliminates or significantly increases the size or weight limitations currently applicable to motor carriers, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Additionally, any future consolidation of the rail industry could materially affect the competitive environment in which we operate.

We Rely on Technology and Technology Improvements in Our Business Operations – We rely on information technology in all aspects of our business. If we do not have sufficient capital to acquire new technology or if we are unable to develop or implement new technology such as PTC or the latest version of our transportation control systems, we may suffer a competitive disadvantage within the rail industry and with companies providing other modes of transportation service, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Additionally, if a cyber attack or other event causes significant disruption or failure of one or more of our information technology systems, including computer hardware, software, and communications equipment, we could suffer a significant service interruption, safety failure, security breach, or other operational difficulties, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We May Be Subject to Various Claims and Lawsuits That Could Result in Significant Expenditures – As a railroad with operations in densely populated urban areas and other cities and a vast rail network, we are exposed to the potential for various claims and litigation related to labor and employment, personal injury, property damage, environmental liability, and other matters. Any material changes to litigation trends or a catastrophic rail accident or series of accidents involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability that exceed our insurance coverage for such risks could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We Are Subject to Significant Environmental Laws and Regulations – Due to the nature of the railroad business, our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations concerning, among other things, emissions to the air; discharges to waters; handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of waste and other materials; and hazardous material or petroleum releases. We generate and transport hazardous and non-hazardous waste in our operations, and we did so in our former operations. Environmental liability can extend to previously owned or operated properties, leased properties, and properties owned by third parties, as well as to properties we currently own. Environmental liabilities have arisen and may also arise from claims asserted by adjacent landowners or other third parties in toxic tort litigation. We have been and may be subject to allegations or findings that we have violated, or are strictly liable under, these laws or regulations. We currently have certain obligations at existing sites for investigation, remediation, and monitoring, and we likely will have obligations at other sites in the future. Liabilities for these obligations affect our estimate based on our experience and, as necessary, the advice and assistance of our consultants. However, actual costs may vary from our estimates due to any or all of several factors, including changes to environmental laws or interpretations of such laws, technological changes affecting investigations and remediation, the participation and financial viability of other parties responsible for any such liability, and the corrective action or change to corrective actions required to remediate any existing or future sites. We could incur significant costs as a result of any of the foregoing, and we may be required to incur significant expenses to investigate and remediate known, unknown, or future environmental contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Macroeconomic and Industry Risks

We Face Competition from Other Railroads and Other Transportation Providers – We face competition from other railroads, motor carriers, ships, barges, and pipelines. Our main railroad competitor is Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC. Its primary subsidiary, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), operates parallel routes in many of our main traffic corridors. In addition, we operate in corridors served by other railroads and motor carriers. Motor carrier competition exists for all three of our commodity groups (excluding most coal shipments). Because of the proximity of our routes to major inland and Gulf Coast waterways, barges can be particularly competitive, especially for grain and bulk commodities in certain areas where we operate. In addition to price competition, we face competition with respect to transit times, quality, and reliability of service from motor carriers and other railroads. Motor carriers in particular can have an advantage over railroads with respect to transit times and timeliness of service. However, railroads are much more fuel-efficient than trucks, which reduces the impact of transporting goods on the environment and public infrastructure, and we have been making efforts to convert truck traffic to rail. Additionally, we must build or acquire and maintain our rail system, while trucks, barges, and maritime operators are able to use public rights-of-way maintained by public entities. Any of the following could also affect the competitiveness of our transportation services for some or all of our commodities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity: (i) improvements or expenditures materially increasing the quality or reducing the costs of these alternative modes of transportation, such as autonomous or more fuel efficient trucks, (ii) legislation that eliminates or significantly increases the size or weight limitations applied to motor carriers, or (iii) legislation or regulatory changes that impose operating restrictions on railroads or that adversely affect the profitability of some or all railroad traffic. Many movements face product or geographic competition where our customers can use different products (e.g. natural gas instead of coal, sorghum instead of corn) or commodities from different locations (e.g. grain from states or countries that we do not serve, crude oil from different regions). Sourcing different commodities or different locations allows shippers to substitute different carriers and such competition may reduce our volume or constrain prices. Additionally, any future consolidation of the rail industry could materially affect our competitive environment.

14


We May Be Affected by Climate Change and Market or Regulatory Responses to Climate Change – Climate change, including the impact of global warming, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Restrictions, caps, taxes, or other controls on emissions of greenhouse gasses, including diesel exhaust, could significantly increase our operating costs. Restrictions on emissions could also affect our customers that (a) use commodities that we carry to produce energy, (b) use significant amounts of energy in producing or delivering the commodities we carry, or (c) manufacture or produce goods that consume significant amounts of energy or burn fossil fuels, including chemical producers, farmers and food producers, and automakers and other manufacturers. Significant cost increases, government regulation, or changes of consumer preferences for goods or services relating to alternative sources of energy or emissions reductions could materially affect the markets for the commodities we carry, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Government incentives encouraging the use of alternative sources of

11


energy also could also affect certain of our customers and the markets for certain of the commodities we carry in an unpredictable manner that could alter our traffic patterns, including, for example, increasing royalties charged to producers of PRB coal by the U.S. Department of Interior and the impacts of ethanol incentives on farming and ethanol producers. Finally, weWe could face increased costs related to defending and resolving legal claims and other litigation related to climate change and the alleged impact of our operations on climate change. Violent weather caused by climate change, including earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods, extreme temperatures, avalanches, and significant precipitation could cause line outages and other interruptions to our infrastructure. Any of these factors, individually or in operation with one or more of the other factors, or other unforeseen impacts of climate change could reduce the amount of traffic we handle and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Severe Weather Could ResultOur business, financial condition, and results of operations have been adversely affected and in Significant Business Interruptionsthe future could be materially adversely affected by pandemics – Our business, financial condition, and Expenditures – Asresults of operations have been adversely affected by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and may be affected by other pandemics. COVID-19 has caused, and is expected to continue to cause, a railroad withglobal slowdown of economic activity (including the decrease in demand for a vast network, we are exposed to severe weather conditions and other natural phenomena, including earthquakes, hurricanes, fires, floods, mudslides or landslides, extreme temperatures,broad variety of goods), disruptions in global supply chains, and significant precipitation. Line outagesvolatility and other interruptions caused bydisruption of financial markets and that also has adversely affected workforces, customers, and regional and local economies. Other future pandemics may cause these conditions can adversely affectsame or similar consequences. Because the severity, magnitude, and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic consequences are uncertain, rapidly changing, and difficult to predict, the impact on our entire rail networkbusiness and can adversely affect revenue, costs,financial condition remains uncertain and liabilities, which could have a material adverse effectdifficult to predict. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations and financial condition remains uncertain and liquidity.

Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect Our Operations – The U.S. Class I railroads are partydepends on numerous evolving factors, which we may not be able to collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions. The majority of our employees belongeffectively respond to labor unions and are subjectnot entirely within our control. These factors also may be of importance for other pandemics, including, but not limited to: governmental, business, and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to these agreements. Disputes with regardbe taken in response to a global pandemic (including restrictions on travel and transport, workforce pressures, and social distancing, and shelter-in-place orders); the termseffect of these agreements or our potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these unions could resulta pandemic on economic activity and actions taken in among other things, strikes, work stoppages, slowdowns, or lockouts, which could cause a significant disruption of our operations and have a material adverseresponse; the effect on our customers and their demand for our services; the effect of a pandemic on the credit-worthiness of our customers; national or global supply chain challenges or disruption; facility closures; commodity cost volatility; general economic uncertainty in key global markets and financial market volatility; global economic conditions and levels of economic growth; and the pace of recovery as the pandemic subsides as well as response to a potential reoccurrence. Further, a pandemic, and the volatile regional and global economic conditions stemming from a pandemic, could also precipitate and aggravate the other risk factors that we identify, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations financial condition,(including revenues and liquidity.profitability), and/or stock price. Additionally, future national labor agreements, or renegotiation of labor agreements or provisions of labor agreements, could compromise our service reliability or significantly increase our costs for health care, wages, and other benefits, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.  Labor disputes, work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts at loading/unloading facilities, ports or other transport access points could compromise our service reliability and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.  Labor disputes, work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts by employees of our customers or our suppliers could compromise our service reliability and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

The Availability of Qualified Personnel Could Adversely Affect Our Operations – Changes in demographics, training requirements, and the availability of qualified personnel could negativelypandemic also may affect our abilityoperating and financial results in a manner that is not presently known to meet demand for rail service. Unpredictable increases in demand for rail services and a lack of network fluidity may exacerbate suchus or that we currently do not consider to present significant risks which could have a negative impact onto our operational efficiency and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.operations.

Financial Risks

We May BeAre Affected By Fluctuating Fuel Prices – Fuel costs constitute a significant portion of our transportation expenses. Diesel fuel prices can be subject to dramatic fluctuations, and significant price increases could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Although we currently are able to recover a significant amount of our fuel expenses from our customers through revenue from fuel surcharges, we cannot be certain that we will always be able to mitigate rising or elevated fuel costs through our fuel surcharges. Additionally, future market conditions or legislative or regulatory activities could adversely affect our ability to apply fuel surcharges or adequately recover increased fuel costs through fuel surcharges. As fuel prices fluctuate, our fuel surcharge programs trail such fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months, and may be a significant source of quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year

15


volatility, particularly in periods of rapidly changing prices. International, political, and economic factors, events and conditions affect the volatility of fuel prices and supplies. Weather can also affect fuel supplies and limit domestic refining capacity. A severe shortage of, or disruption to, domestic fuel supplies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Alternatively, lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products we transport. However, lower fuel prices could have a negative impact on other commodities we transport, such as coal and domestic drilling-related shipments, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We UtilizeRely on Capital Markets – Due to the significant capital expenditures required to operate and maintain a safe and efficient railroad, we rely on the capital markets to provide some of our capital requirements. We utilize long-term debt instruments, bank financing, and commercial paper from time-to-time, and we pledge certain of our receivables. Significant instability or disruptions of the capital markets, including the credit markets, or deterioration of our financial condition due to internal or external factors could restrict or prohibit

12


our access to, and significantly increase the cost of, commercial paper and other financing sources, including bank credit facilities and the issuance of long-term debt, including corporate bonds. A significant deterioration of our financial condition could result in a reduction of our credit rating to below investment grade, which could restrict or, at certain credit levels below investment grade, may prohibit us from utilizing our current receivables securitization facility. This may also limit our access to external sources of capital and significantly increase the costs of short and long-term debt financing.

A Significant PortionGeneral Risk Factors

We Are Affected by General Economic Conditions – Prolonged, severe adverse domestic and global economic conditions or disruptions of Our Revenue Involves Transportationfinancial and credit markets may affect the producers and consumers of Commodities tothe commodities we carry and from International Markets – Although revenues from our operations are attributable to transportation services provided in the U.S., a significant portion of our revenues involves the transportation of commodities to and from international markets, including Mexico and Southeast Asia, by various carriers and, at times, various modes of transportation. Significant and sustained interruptions of trade with Mexico or countries in Southeast Asia, including China, could adversely affect customers and other entities that, directly or indirectly, purchase or rely on rail transportation services in the U.S. as part of their operations, and any such interruptions couldmay have a material adverse effect on our access to liquidity, results of operations, and financial condition and liquidity. Any one or more of the following could cause a significant and sustained interruption of trade with Mexico or countries in Southeast Asia: (a) a deterioration of security for international trade and businesses; (b) the adverse impact of new laws, rules and regulations or the interpretation of laws, rules and regulations by government entities, courts or regulatory bodies, including modifications to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and actions of taxing authorities that affect our customers doing business in foreign countries; (c) any significant adverse economic developments, such as extended periods of high inflation, material disruptions in the banking sector or in the capital markets of these foreign countries, and significant changes in the valuation of the currencies of these foreign countries that could materially affect the cost or value of imports or exports; (d) shifts in patterns of international trade that adversely affect import and export markets; and (e) a material reduction in foreign direct investment in these countries.condition.

We Are Subject to Legislative, Regulatory, and Legal Developments Involving Taxes – Taxes are a significant part of our expenses.  We are subject to U.S. federal, state, and foreign income, payroll, property, sales and use, fuel, and other types of taxes. Changes in tax rates, such as those included in the recently enacted U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enactment of new tax laws, revisions of tax regulations, and claims or litigation with taxing authorities could result in a material effect to our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.  Higher tax rates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We Are Dependent on Certain Key Suppliers of Locomotives and Rail – Due to the capital intensive nature and sophistication of locomotive equipment, parts and maintenance, potential new suppliers face high barriers to entry.  Therefore, if one of the domestic suppliers of high horsepower locomotives discontinues manufacturing locomotives, supplying parts or providing maintenance for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience significant cost increases and reduced availability of the locomotives that are necessary for our operations.  Additionally, for a high percentage of our rail purchases, we utilize two steel producers (one domestic and one international) that meet our specifications.  Rail is critical to our operations for rail replacement programs, maintenance, and for adding additional network capacity, new rail and storage yards, and expansions of existing facilities.  This industry similarly has high barriers to entry, and if one of these suppliers discontinues operations for any reason, including bankruptcy or insolvency, we could experience both significant cost increases for rail purchases and difficulty obtaining sufficient rail for maintenance and other projects.

We May Be Affected by Acts of Terrorism, War, or Risk of War – Our rail lines, facilities, and equipment, including rail cars carrying hazardous materials, could be direct targets or indirect casualties of terrorist attacks. Terrorist attacks, or other similar events, any government response thereto, and war or risk of war may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. In addition, insurance premiums for some or all of our current coverages could increase dramatically, or certain coverages may not be available to us in the future.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

1316


Item 2. Properties

We employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business. Our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the U.S.

Picture 5

TRACK

Our rail network includes 32,12232,313 route miles. We own 26,04226,069 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases. The following table describes track miles at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016:2019:

 

 

2017 2016 

2020 

2019

Route

32,122 32,070 

32,313 

32,340 

Other main line

7,107 7,070 

7,097 

7,095 

Passing lines and turnouts

3,255 3,245 

3,382 

3,301 

Switching and classification yard lines

9,199 9,115 

9,001 

9,007 

Total miles

51,683 51,500 

51,793 

51,743 

HEADQUARTERS BUILDING

We own our headquarters building in Omaha, Nebraska. The facility has 1.2 million square feet of space that can accommodate approximately 4,000 employees.

HARRIMAN DISPATCHING CENTER

The Harriman Dispatching Center (HDC), located in Omaha, Nebraska, is our primary dispatching facility. It is linked to regional dispatching and locomotive management facilities at various locations along our network. HDC employees coordinate moves of locomotives and trains, manage traffic and train crews on

1417


our network, and coordinate interchanges with other railroads. Approximately 900700 employees currently work on-site in the facility. In the event of a disruption of operations at HDC due to a cyber attack,cyber-attack, flooding or severe weather, pandemic outbreak, or other event, we maintain the capability to conduct critical operations at back-up facilities in different locations.

RAIL FACILITIES

In addition to our track structure, we operate numerous facilities, including terminals for intermodal and other freight; rail yards for building trains (classification yards), switching, storage-in-transit (the temporary storage of customer goods in rail cars prior to shipment), and other activities; offices to administer and manage our operations; dispatching centers to direct traffic on our rail network; crew quarters to houseon duty locations for train crews along our network; and shops and other facilities for fueling, maintenance, and repair of locomotives and repair and maintenance of rail cars and other equipment. The following table includes the major yards and terminals on our system:

Major Classification Yards

Major Intermodal Terminals

North Platte, Nebraska

Joliet (Global 4), Illinois

North Little Rock, Arkansas

East Los Angeles, California

Englewood (Houston), Texas

ICTF (Los Angeles), California

Fort Worth, TexasLivonia, Louisiana

Global I (Chicago), Illinois

Livonia, Louisiana

DIT (Dallas), Texas

Proviso (Chicago), Illinois

Mesquite, Texas

Roseville, California

City of Industry, California

West Colton, California

Global II (Chicago), Illinois

Pine Bluff, ArkansasWest Colton, California

Marion (Memphis), TennesseeCity of Industry, California

Neff (Kansas City), MissouriHouston, Texas

Lathrop, California

Proviso (Chicago), Illinois

LATC (Los Angeles), California

Roseville, California

Salt Lake City, Utah

RAIL EQUIPMENT

Our equipment includes owned and leased locomotives and rail cars; heavy maintenance equipment and machinery; other equipment and tools in our shops, offices, and facilities; and vehicles for maintenance, transportation of crews, and other activities. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we owned or leased the following units of equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

Average

Locomotives

Owned

Leased

Total

Age (yrs.)

Owned

Leased

Total

Age (yrs.)

Multiple purpose

6,392 1,852 8,244 20.0 

6,255 

1,055 

7,310 

21.7 

Switching

213 12 225 36.9 

174 

-

174 

40.5 

Other

47 57 104 38.5 

24 

61 

85 

40.4 

Total locomotives

6,652 1,921 8,573 

N/A

6,453 

1,116 

7,569 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

Average

Freight cars

Owned

Leased

Total

Age (yrs.)

Owned

Leased

Total

Age (yrs.)

Covered hoppers

13,804 12,629 26,433 20.4 

13,328 

8,298 

21,626 

21.6 

Open hoppers

6,897 2,427 9,324 30.9 

5,202 

1,762 

6,964 

32.2 

Gondolas

5,798 2,772 8,570 26.7 

5,431 

2,001 

7,432 

29.3 

Boxcars

2,957 6,780 9,737 36.1 

2,306 

6,620 

8,926 

41.1 

Refrigerated cars

2,600 3,486 6,086 25.4 

2,279 

2,464 

4,743 

26.4 

Flat cars

2,533 1,147 3,680 32.4 

2,027 

945 

2,972 

35.3 

Other

353 361 29.9 

268 

270 

32.4 

Total freight cars

34,597 29,594 64,191 

N/A

30,575 

22,358 

52,933 

N/A

Average

Highway revenue equipment

Owned 

Leased 

Total 

Age (yrs.)

Containers

49,409 

3,547 

52,956 

9.8 

Chassis

30,099 

14,270 

44,369 

11.6 

Total highway revenue equipment

79,508 

17,817 

97,325 

N/A

1518




 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Average

Highway revenue equipment

Owned

Leased

Total

Age (yrs.)

Containers

38,655 15,327 53,982 8.8 

Chassis

23,711 21,771 45,482 10.9 

Total highway revenue equipment

62,366 37,098 99,464 

N/A

We continuously assess our need for equipment to run an efficient and reliable network. Many factors cause us to adjust the size of our active fleets, including changes in carload volume, weather events, seasonality, customer preferences, and productivity initiatives. As some of these factors are difficult to assess or can change rapidly, we maintain a surge fleet to remain agile. Without the surge fleet, our ability to react quickly is hindered as equipment suppliers are limited and lead times to acquire equipment are long and may be in excess of a year. We believe our locomotive and freight car fleets are appropriately sized to meet our current and future business requirements. These fleets serve as the most reliable and efficient equipment to facilitate growth without additional acquisitions. Locomotive and freight car in service utilization percentages for the year ended December 31, 2020, were 58% and 71%, respectively.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

Our rail network requires significant annual capital investments for replacement, improvement, and expansion. These investments enhance safety, support the transportation needs of our customers, and improve our operational efficiency. Additionally, we add new locomotives and freight cars to our fleet to replace older less efficient equipment and to support growth and customer demand, and to reduce our impact on the environment through the acquisition of more fuel-efficient and low-emission locomotives.demand.

20172020 Capital Program – During 2017,2020, our capital program totaled approximately $3.1$2.84 billion. (See the cash capital expendituresinvestments table in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources, Item 7.)7, of this report)

20182021 Capital PlanIn 2018,2021, we expect our capital plan to be approximately $3.3 billion.  The plan includes expenditures to renew and improve our existing infrastructure as well as new capacity investments, including initial construction work on a new classification yard in our Southern Region.  In addition, expenditures will be made for PTC, locomotives, intermodal containers and chassis, and freight cars.  We may revise our 2018 capital plan if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments.  (See$2.9 billion, essentially flat with 2020. (See further discussion of our 20182021 capital plan in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – 2018 Outlook,Liquidity and Capital Resources, Item 7.)7, of this report)

OTHER

Equipment Encumbrances – Equipment with a carrying value of approximately $2.0$1.3 billion and $2.3$1.6 billion at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, served as collateral for capitalfinance leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire or refinance such railroad equipment.

As a result of the merger of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MPRR) with and into UPRR on January 1, 1997, and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the MPRR mortgage bonds, UPRR must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds. As of the merger date, the value of the MPRR assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $6.0 billion. In accordance with the terms of the indentures, this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds.

Environmental Matters – Certain of our properties are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. (See discussion within this report of environmental issues in Business – Governmental and Environmental Regulation, Item 1,1; Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental, Item 7,7; and Note 1817 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and litigation that occur in connection with our business. We routinely assess our liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based upon the latest available information, and, when necessary, we seek input from our third-party advisors when making these assessments. Consistent with SEC rules and requirements, we describe below material pending legal proceedings (other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business), material proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities, other proceedings arising under federal, state, or local environmental laws and regulations (including governmental proceedings involving potential fines, penalties, or other monetary sanctions in excess of $100,000)$1,000,000), and such other pending matters that we may determine to be appropriate.

16


ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

We receive notices from the EPA and state environmental agencies alleging that we are or may be liable under federal or state environmental laws for remediation costs at various sites throughout the U.S., including sites on the Superfund National Priorities List or state superfund lists. We cannot predict the ultimate impact of these proceedings and suits because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs.

On May 2, 2015, a UPRR train en route from Chicago, IL. to St. Louis, MO. experienced an accidental release of diesel fuel in the vicinity of Sidney, IL. It is believed that the release was caused by a puncture to a fuel tank under one or more of the locomotives attached to the train. The impacted fuel tank(s) released the majority of their contents onto the ground, approximately 400 feet from an unnamed creek. Some of the fuel migrated into that creek, which discharges to the Salt Fork River. We immediately notified federal, state and local authorities and dispatched our own emergency response resources to the scene. On May 29, 2015, we entered into an agreed-upon interim order to perform a comprehensive site investigation and remedial measures at the release site. On March 13, 2017, the State of Illinois issued a demand for $125,000 in civil penalties as part of the ongoing enforcement action. We are currently evaluating the State's demand.

Information concerning environmental claims and contingencies and estimated remediation costs is set forth in this report in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental, Item 7.  See also7, and Note 1817 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

19


OTHER MATTERS

Antitrust Litigation – As we reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, 20 rail shippers (many of whom are represented by the same law firms) filed virtually identical antitrust lawsuits in various federal district courts against us and four other Class I railroads in the U.S. Currently, UPRR and three other Class I railroads are the named defendants in the lawsuit. The original plaintiff filed the first of these claims in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey on May 14, 2007. The number of complaints reached a total of 30. These suits allegealleged that the named railroads engaged in price-fixing by establishing common fuel surcharges for certain rail traffic.

As previously reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, an appellate hearing related to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s denial of class certification for the rail shippers was held on September 28, 2018. On June 21, 2012, Judge Friedman issued a decision that certified a class of plaintiffs with eight named plaintiff representatives. The decision included in the class all shippers that paid a rate-based fuel surcharge to any one of the defendant railroads for rate-unregulated rail transportation from July 1, 2003, through December 31, 2008. On July 5, 2012, the defendant railroads filed a petition withAugust 16, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia requesting thatCircuit affirmed the decision of U.S. District Court denying class certification (the Certification Denial). Only five plaintiffs remain in this multidistrict litigation (MDL) originally filed in 2007, which remains pending. They are proceeding on a consolidated basis in the U.S. District of Columbia Court before the Honorable Paul L. Friedman (MDL I). Since the Certification Denial, approximately 96 lawsuits have been filed in federal court reviewbased on claims identical to those alleged in the class certification ruling. On August 9, 2013, the Circuit Court vacated the class certification decision and remanded the case to the district court to reconsider the class certification decision in light of a recent Supreme Court case and incomplete consideration of errorscase. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated these suits for pretrial proceedings in the expert report of the plaintiffs. After reviewing an intervening case, supplemental expert materials and related briefing from the parties, Judge Friedman scheduled and completed a new class certification hearing during the week of September 26, 2016. On October 10, 2017, the parties received a ruling from Judge Friedman denying class certification. Plaintiffs have sought appellate review of that ruling and on December 20, 2017, were granted the right of an interlocutory appeal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. District Court before the Honorable Beryl A. Howell (MDL II).

As we reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 10, 2011, the Railroad received a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on June 7, 2011, by Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC and related entities (Oxbow). The fuel surcharge antitrust claim remains and was stayed pending the decision on class certification discussed above. As a result of the Certification Denial, the parties are currently conductingcontinued to discovery and discovery is complete in this matter. For additional informationThe parties do not anticipate dates for summary judgment or trial will be set in the Oxbow matter until Judge Friedman rules on Oxbow, please refer to Item 3. Legal Proceedings, under Other Matters, Antitrust Litigationcertain matters in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. MDL I mentioned above.

We continue to deny the allegations that our fuel surcharge programs violate the antitrust laws or any other laws. We believe that these lawsuits are without merit, and we will vigorously defend our actions. Therefore, we currently believe that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on any of our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Litigation- As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, a lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (the District Court-Washington), in 2016, alleging violations of the ADA and Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act relating to Fitness for Duty requirements for safety sensitive positions. On August 8, 2016, the District Court-Washington granted plaintiffs' motion to transfer their claim to the U.S. District Court of Nebraska (the District Court-Nebraska). On February 5, 2019, the District Court-Nebraska granted plaintiffs’ motion to certify the ADA allegations as a class action. We were granted the right to appeal this class certification to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (the Eighth Circuit) on March 13, 2019, and the matter was argued before the Eighth Circuit in November 2019. As reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, a panel of Eighth Circuit judges issued a decision overturning the District Court-Nebraska and decertified the class action on March 24, 2020.

Plaintiff’s counsel did not pursue an appeal of the Eighth Circuit’s decision and is instead pursuing over 160 former class members’ individual ADA lawsuits against the Company in the District Court-Nebraska. The Company has filed a motion to sever the class representatives’ individual claims and that motion is currently pending. Additionally, purported members of the class have filed approximately 220 individual charges of discrimination with various offices of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

We intend to vigorously defend the lawsuits currently pending in the United States District Courts and charges of discrimination currently being investigated by the EEOC. We believe that these lawsuits are without merit, and that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable. 

1720


Information About Our Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive Officers of Our Subsidiaries

The Board of Directors typically elects and designates our executive officers on an annual basis at the board meeting held in conjunction with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and they hold office until their successors are elected. Executive officers also may be elected and designated throughout the year, as the Board of Directors considers appropriate. There are no family relationships among the officers, nor is there any arrangement or understanding between any officer and any other person pursuant to which the officer was selected. The following table sets forth certain information current as of February 9, 2018,5, 2021, relating to the executive officers.

Business

Experience During

Name

Position

Age

Past Five Years

Lance M. Fritz

Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of UPC and the Railroad

5558

[1]Current Position

Robert M. Knight, Jr.Jennifer L. Hamann

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

of UPC and the Railroad

6053

Current Position[1]

Rhonda S. FergusonCraig V. Richardson

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary of UPC and the Railroad

4859

[2]

Kenny G. Rocker

Executive Vice President – Marketing and Sales of

the Railroad

49

[3]

Todd M. Rynaski

Vice President and Controller of UPC and Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Railroad

4750

[3]Current Position

Cameron A. ScottEric J. Gehringer

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Railroad

55

[4]

Elizabeth F. Whited

Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the Railroad

52

[5]

[1]

On July 30, 2015, Mr. Fritz was named Chairman of the Board of UPC and the Railroad effective October 1, 2015. Mr. Fritz was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of UPC and the Railroad effective February 5, 2015. Previously, Mr. Fritz was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Railroad effective February 6, 2014, Executive Vice President – Operations of the Railroad effective September 1, 2010, and Vice President – Operations of the Railroad effective January 1, 2010.

[2]41

[4]

Elizabeth F. Whited

Ms. Ferguson was elected Corporate Secretary of UPC and the Railroad effective December 1, 2017, and Executive Vice President and Chief LegalHuman Resources Officer of UPC and the Railroad effective July 11, 2016. She previously was Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Chief Ethics Officer of FirstEnergy Corp. since 2007.

[3]55

[5]

Mr. Rynaski was elected Vice President and Controller of UPC and Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of the Railroad effective September 1, 2015. He previously was Assistant Vice President – Accounting of the Railroad effective January 1, 2014, and Assistant Vice President – Financial Reporting and Analysis effective April 1, 2011.

[4]

Mr. Scott was elected to his current position effective February 6, 2014. He previously was Vice President Network Planning and Operations effective June 30, 2012.

[5]

Ms. Whited was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer effective December 1, 2016. She previously was Vice President and General Manager – Chemicals effective October 1, 2012.

[1]Ms. Hamann was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of UPC and the Railroad effective January 1, 2020. She previously served as Senior Vice President – Finance (April 2019 – December 2019), Vice President – Planning & Analysis (October 2017 – March 2019), and Vice President & General Manager – Marketing and Sales – Autos team (February 2016 – September 2017).

[2]Mr. Richardson was elected Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary of UPC and the Railroad effective December 8, 2020. He most recently served as Vice President – Commercial and Regulatory Law since 2015.

[3]Mr. Rocker was elected Executive Vice President – Marketing and Sales of the Railroad effective August 15, 2018. Mr. Rocker previously served at the Railroad as Vice President – Marketing and Sales – Industrial team (October 2016 – August 2018). Prior to this election, Mr. Rocker served as Assistant Vice President – Marketing and Sales – Chemicals team (April 2014 – September 2016).

[4]Mr. Gehringer was elected Executive Vice President – Operations of the Railroad effective January 1, 2021. Mr. Gehringer previously served as Senior Vice President – Transportation (July 2020 – December 2020), Vice President – Mechanical and Engineering (January 2020 – July 2020), Vice President – Engineering (March 2018 – January 2020), Assistant Vice President – Engineering (September 2016 – March 2018), and General Director – Maintenance of Way (May 2015 – September 2016).

[5]Ms. Whited was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of UPC and the Railroad effective August 15, 2018. She previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (December 2016 – August 2018) and Vice President and General Manager – Marketing and Sales – Chemicals team (October 2012 – December 2016).


18

21


PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “UNP”.  The following table presents the dividends declared and the high and low prices of our common stock for each of the indicated quarters.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017 - Dollars Per Share

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

Dividends

$

0.605 

$

0.605 

$

0.605 

$

0.665 

Common stock price:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    High

 

111.38 

 

115.15 

 

116.93 

 

136.32 

    Low

 

101.20 

 

104.12 

 

101.06 

 

108.71 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 - Dollars Per Share

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

Dividends

$

0.55 

$

0.55 

$

0.55 

$

0.605 

Common stock price:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    High

 

85.30 

 

90.14 

 

98.00 

 

106.62 

    Low

 

67.06 

 

77.29 

 

86.01 

 

87.06 

At February 2, 2018,January 29, 2021, there were 779,305,276669,829,363 shares of common stock outstanding and 30,65329,745 common shareholders of record. On that date, the closing price of the common stock on the NYSE was $129.36.$197.47. We paid dividends to our common shareholders during each of the past 118121 years. We declared dividends totaling $1,982 million in 2017 and $1,879 million in 2016. On February 8, 2018, we increased the quarterly dividend to $0.73 per share, payable on March 30, 2018, to shareholders of record on February 28, 2018. We are subject to certain restrictions regarding retained earnings with respect to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders. The amount of retained earnings available for dividends increased to $16.4 billion at December 31, 2017, from $12.4 billion at December 31, 2016.  (See discussion of this restriction in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources, Item 7.)  We do not believe the restriction on retained earnings will affect our ability to pay dividends, and we currently expect to pay dividends in 2018.

Comparison Over One- and Three-Year Periods – The following table presents the cumulative total shareholder returns, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over one- and three-year periods for the Corporation (UNP), a peer group index (comprised of CSX Corporation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), the Dow Jones Transportation Index (DJ Trans), and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (S&P 500).



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period

UNP

 

Peer Group

 

DJ Trans

 

S&P 500

 

1 Year (2017)

32.2 

%

46.5 

%

19.0 

%

21.8 

%

3 Year (2015 - 2017)

20.7 

 

52.4 

 

21.2 

 

38.3 

 

Period

UNP 

Peer Group

DJ Trans 

S&P 500 

1 Year (2020)

17.7 

%

26.0 

%

16.5 

%

18.4 

%

3 Year (2018 - 2020)

65.6 

72.7 

23.4 

48.8 

19


Five-Year Performance Comparison – The following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the Corporation as compared to the peer group index (described above), the DJ Trans, and the S&P 500. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in the common stock of Union Pacific Corporation and each index on December 31, 20122015, and that all dividends were reinvested. The information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

Picture 3


22


Purchases of Equity Securities – During 2017,2020, we repurchased 37,122,40522,826,071 shares of our common stock at an average price of $110.50.$167.92. The following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2017:2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased [a]

 

Average Price Paid Per Share

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced
Plan or Program [b]

Maximum Number of  Shares Remaining Under the Plan or Program [b]

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased [a]

Average Price Paid Per Share

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced
Plan or Program

Maximum Number of Shares Remaining Under the Plan or Program [b]

Oct. 1 through Oct. 31

Oct. 1 through Oct. 31

3,831,636 

$

113.61 3,800,000 89,078,662 

Oct. 1 through Oct. 31

1,030,821 

$

189.84 

1,022,254 

113,781,459 

Nov. 1 through Nov. 30

Nov. 1 through Nov. 30

3,005,225 

 

117.07 2,937,410 86,141,252 

Nov. 1 through Nov. 30

1,235,113 

198.87 

1,233,689 

112,547,770 

Dec. 1 through Dec. 31

Dec. 1 through Dec. 31

2,718,319 

 

130.76 2,494,100 83,647,152 

Dec. 1 through Dec. 31

1,525,273 

203.03 

1,524,800 

111,022,970 

Total

Total

9,555,180 

$

119.58 9,231,510 

N/A

Total

3,791,207 

$

198.09 

3,780,743 

N/A

[a]Total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 10,464 shares delivered or attested to UPC by employees to pay stock option exercise prices, satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units, and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares.

[b]Effective April 1, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 150 million shares of our common stock by March 31, 2022, replacing our previous repurchase program. These repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions. Our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions.


[a]

Total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 323,670 shares delivered or attested to UPC by employees to pay stock option exercise prices, satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units, and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares.

[b]

Effective January 1, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by December 31, 2020. These repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions. Our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions.

2023


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table presents as of, and for the years ended, December 31, our selected financial data for each of the last five years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, and with the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8. The information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except per Share Amounts,

Millions, Except per Share Amounts,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except per Share Amounts,

Carloads, Employee Statistics, and Ratios

Carloads, Employee Statistics, and Ratios

2017[a]

2016 2015 2014 2013 

Carloads, Employee Statistics, and Ratios

2020[a]

2019

2018

2017[b]

2016

For the Year Ended December 31

For the Year Ended December 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31

Operating revenues [b]

$

21,240 

$

19,941 

$

21,813 

$

23,988 

$

21,963 

Operating revenues [c]

Operating revenues [c]

$

19,533 

$

21,708 

$

22,832 

$

21,240 

$

19,941 

Operating income

Operating income

 

8,061 

 

7,272 

 

8,052 

 

8,753 

 

7,446 

Operating income

7,834 

8,554 

8,517 

8,106 

7,243 

Net income

Net income

 

10,712 

 

4,233 

 

4,772 

 

5,180 

 

4,388 

Net income

5,349 

5,919 

5,966 

10,712 

4,233 

Earnings per share - basic [c]

 

13.42 

 

5.09 

 

5.51 

 

5.77 

 

4.74 

Earnings per share - diluted [c]

 

13.36 

 

5.07 

 

5.49 

 

5.75 

 

4.71 

Dividends declared per share [c]

 

2.48 

 

2.255 

 

2.20 

 

1.91 

 

1.48 

Earnings per share - basic

Earnings per share - basic

7.90 

8.41 

7.95 

13.42 

5.09 

Earnings per share - diluted

Earnings per share - diluted

7.88 

8.38 

7.91 

13.36 

5.07 

Dividends declared per share

Dividends declared per share

3.88 

3.70 

3.06 

2.48 

2.255 

Cash provided by operating activities

Cash provided by operating activities

 

7,230 

 

7,525 

 

7,344 

 

7,385 

 

6,823 

Cash provided by operating activities

8,540 

8,609 

8,686 

7,230 

7,525 

Cash used in investing activities

Cash used in investing activities

 

(3,086)

 

(3,393)

 

(4,476)

 

(4,249)

 

(3,405)

Cash used in investing activities

(2,676)

(3,435)

(3,411)

(3,086)

(3,393)

Cash used in financing activities

Cash used in financing activities

 

(4,146)

 

(4,246)

 

(3,063)

 

(2,982)

 

(3,049)

Cash used in financing activities

(4,902)

(5,646)

(5,222)

(4,146)

(4,246)

Cash used for common share repurchases

 

(4,013)

 

(3,105)

 

(3,465)

 

(3,225)

 

(2,218)

Cash used for share repurchase programs

Cash used for share repurchase programs

(3,705)

(5,804)

(8,225)

(4,013)

(3,105)

At December 31

At December 31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31

Total assets

Total assets

$

57,806 

$

55,718 

$

54,600 

$

52,372 

$

49,410 

Total assets

$

62,398 

$

61,673 

$

59,147 

$

57,806 

$

55,718 

Long-term obligations [d]

Long-term obligations [d]

 

29,011 

 

32,146 

 

30,692 

 

27,419 

 

24,395 

Long-term obligations [d]

41,267 

39,194 

34,098 

29,011 

32,146 

Debt due after one year

Debt due after one year

 

16,144 

 

14,249 

 

13,607 

 

10,952 

 

8,820 

Debt due after one year

25,660 

23,943 

20,925 

16,144 

14,249 

Common shareholders' equity

Common shareholders' equity

 

24,856 

 

19,932 

 

20,702 

 

21,189 

 

21,225 

Common shareholders' equity

16,958 

18,128 

20,423 

24,856 

19,932 

Additional Data

Additional Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Data

Freight revenues [b]

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

$

20,397 

$

22,560 

$

20,684 

Freight revenues [c]

Freight revenues [c]

$

18,251 

$

20,243 

$

21,384 

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

Revenue carloads (units) (000)

Revenue carloads (units) (000)

 

8,588 

 

8,442 

 

9,062 

 

9,625 

 

9,022 

Revenue carloads (units) (000)

7,753 

8,346 

8,908 

8,588 

8,442 

Operating ratio (%) [e]

Operating ratio (%) [e]

 

62.0 

 

63.5 

 

63.1 

 

63.5 

 

66.1 

Operating ratio (%) [e]

59.9 

60.6 

62.7 

61.8 

63.7 

Average employees (000)

Average employees (000)

 

42.0 

 

42.9 

 

47.5 

 

47.2 

 

46.4 

Average employees (000)

31.0 

37.5 

42.0 

42.0 

42.9 

Financial Ratios (%)

Financial Ratios (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Ratios (%)

Debt to capital [f]

 

40.5 

 

43.0 

 

40.7 

 

35.0 

 

31.0 

Return on average common
shareholders' equity [g]

 

47.8 

 

20.8 

 

22.8 

 

24.4 

 

21.4 

Return on average common
shareholders' equity [f]

Return on average common
shareholders' equity [f]

30.5 

30.7 

26.4 

47.8 

20.8 

[a]

[a]2020 includes a $278 million non-cash impairment charge related to Brazos yard.

[b]2017 includes a $5.9 billion non-cash reduction to income tax expense and $212 million non-cash reduction to operating expenses related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017.

[c]Includes fuel surcharge revenue of $967 million, $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion, $966 million, and $560 million for 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and $212 million non-cash reduction to operating expenses related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017.

[b]

Includes fuel surcharge revenue of $966 million, $560 million, $1.3 billion, $2.8 billion, and $2.6 billion, for 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, which partially offsets increased operating expenses for fuel. (See further discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Operating Revenues, Item 7.)

[c]

Earnings per share and dividends declared per share are retroactively adjusted to reflect the June 6, 2014 stock split.

[d]

Long-term obligations is determined as follows: total liabilities less current liabilities.

[e]

Operating ratio is defined as operating expenses divided by operating revenues.

[f]

Debt to capital is determined as follows: total debt divided by total debt plus common shareholders' equity.

[g]

Return on average common shareholders' equity is determined as follows: Net income divided by average common shareholders' equity.

21


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Item 7, of this report.)

[d]Long-term obligations is determined as follows: total liabilities less current liabilities.

[e]Operating ratio is defined as operating expenses divided by operating revenues.

[f]Return on average common shareholders' equity is determined as follows: Net income divided by average common shareholders' equity.


24


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and applicable notes to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, and other information in this report, including Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A and Critical Accounting Policies and Cautionary Information at the end of this Item 7. The following section generally discusses 2020 and 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019. Discussions of 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one reportable business segment. Although revenue is analyzed by commodity, we analyze the net financial results of the Railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of the rail network.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

20172020 Results

Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) – 2020 was a year of great uncertainty as COVID-19 spread across the globe. The pandemic caused a dramatic slowdown of the economy as government intervention forced closures and changed individual behaviors, and businesses transformed their operations to protect the health and safety of their employees, customers, and communities. The varying levels of mitigation across different industries had a significant impact on the demand to ship freight in certain market segments. The most notable impact on our revenue was the temporary suspension of automotive production and the corollary effect it had on products used for auto manufacturing. Other reductions in production drove volume declines in a number of other markets as well. The pandemic also disrupted supply chains between Asia and the United States driving declines in intermodal shipments. While second quarter was the hardest hit and volumes have improved sequentially from that quarter, some market segments are still lagging as year-over-year volumes are down.

Safety – The health and wellbeing of our employees was top of mind in 2020 as we navigated the continually changing environment due to COVID-19. We have and are continuing to adapt to protect the safety of our employees, our customers, and the communities we serve. Enhanced safety procedures were implemented across the system, including new procedures and policies based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.

We continued our focus on safety to reduce risk and eliminate incidents for our employees, our customers, and the public. While we have implemented new practices, which drove a 17% improvement in our reportable equipment incident rate per million train miles, we have significant opportunity for improvement remaining. Our reportable personal injury incidents per 200,000 employee-hours of 0.90 was flat with last year. We continued to use Total Safety Culture, Courage to Care, and COMMIT (Coaching, Observing, Mentoring and Motivating with Integrity and Trust) throughout our operations. We remained focused on identifying and managing risks and training our employees as their work environment changes.

Network Operations – While the pandemic resulted in significant swings in volume, we were able to adjust our demand-driven resources to reflect these fluctuations with minimal disruptions to our customers. Both our Intermodal and Manifest/Automotive car trip plan compliance improved 6 points in 2020, showing our dedication to providing the customer with a service product that delivers value. Although the environment we operated in changed due to COVID-19, we continued our operational transformation. This was evident as our key performance indicators have improved substantially year-over-year. Transportation plan changes to eliminate switches and improved terminal processes drove an 8% improvement in freight car terminal dwell. Improved dwell coupled with 3% faster average train speed led to a 6% improvement in freight car velocity. We also saw 14% improvement in locomotive productivity and 11% improvement in work force productivity. Additional detail on these metrics are discussed in Other Operating / Performance and Financial Statistics of this Item 7.

Freight Revenues – Our freight revenues decreased 10% year-over-year to $18.3 billion driven by a volume decline of 7%, lower fuel surcharge revenue, and negative mix of traffic (for example, a relative

·

Safety – During 2017, we continued our focus on safety to reduce risk and eliminate incidents for our employees, our customers and the public. We finished 2017 with a 3% improvement in our reportable derailment incident rate per million train miles compared to 2016.   Although reportable personal injury incidents per 200,000 employee-hours increased 5% from last year’s record low, it is our second lowest year and a 9% decrease from 2015. Despite our efforts in 2017, our crossing incidents rate increased 5% from 2016.  Overall, our 2017 safety results reflect our employees’ dedication to our safety initiatives and our efforts to further engage the workforce through programs such as Courage to Care, Total Safety Culture, and UP Way (our continuous improvement culture).

·

Network Operations  –  Our average train speed, as reported to the AAR, decreased 5% compared to 2016, and our average terminal dwell time increased 8% from 2016.  Disruptions across our network, including the impact of Hurricane Harvey, negatively impacted network fluidity.  Continued implementation and testing of Positive Train Control across a growing number of routes in our network also negatively impacted overall average train speed and terminal dwell.  Network operational challenges in the latter part of the year also negatively impacted terminal dwell.

·

Tax Reform – The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017.  The Tax Act reduced the federal income tax rate from 35%

25


increase in intermodal shipments, which have a lower average revenue per car (ARC)), partially offset by core pricing gains. Volume declined in almost every market segment due to 21% effective January 1, 2018.  As a result, we remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities which resulted in a $5.9 billion non-cash reduction in our income tax expense in 2017.  In addition, we recognized a $212 million non-cash reduction to operating expense related to income tax adjustments recognized at certain equity-method affiliates.  See Note 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

For comparability purposes, the following table reconciles our full year 2017 reported results under accounting principles generally accepteddeteriorating economic conditions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. While some markets rebounded in the U.S. (GAAP)last half of the year, particularly grain and intermodal, others still lagged 2019 levels. Shipments of coal, sand, and petroleum products continue to be negatively impacted by the low crude oil and natural gas prices.

Financial Results In 2020, we generated operating income of $7.8 billion, 8% below 2019, driven by the impacts of COVID-19 and a non-cash impairment charge of $278 million related to our 2017 adjusted results (non-GAAP) forBrazos yard investment. Productivity initiatives, lower volumes, and lower fuel prices drove operating expenses down 11% from 2019. These factors coupled with improved pricing were not enough to offset the tax related items described above.  We believeimpact of the adjusted results provide relevant information torevenue decline. Net income of $5.3 billion translated into earnings of $7.88 per diluted share, down 6% from last year. Despite the adversity from COVID-19, our investors as they more accurately reflect on-going financial performance.  In addition, these measures should be considered in addition to, and not a substitute for operating income, income taxes, net income, diluted EPS,operational transformation produced an all-time record 59.9% operating ratio, improving 0.7 points from 2019.

Fuel Prices – Our average price of diesel fuel in 2020 was $1.50 per gallon, a decrease of 30% from 2019. The lower price resulted in lower operating expenses of $539 million (excluding any impact from year-over-year volume declines). Gross ton-miles decreased 9% and effective tax rate.our fuel consumption rate, computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles, improved 2%, both driving lower fuel expense.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts and

 

Operating

 

Income

 

Net

 

Diluted

Operating

Effective

Percentages

 

Income

 

Taxes

 

Income

 

EPS

Ratio

Tax Rate

2017 Reported results (GAAP)

$

8,061 

$

(3,080)

$

10,712 

$

13.36 62.0 

%

(40.4)

%

Factors Affecting Comparability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Equity-method affiliates

 

(212)

 

(73)

 

(139)

 

(0.17)1.0 

pts

 

     Deferred taxes

 

 

5,935 

 

(5,935)

 

(7.40)

 

77.9 

 

2017 Adjusted results (non-GAAP)

$

7,849 

$

2,782 

$

4,638 

$

5.79 63.0 

%

37.5 

%

2016 Reported results (GAAP)

$

7,272 

$

2,533 

$

4,233 

$

5.07 63.5 

%

37.4 

%

Liquidity – We are continually evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on our financial condition and liquidity. On December 31, 2020, we had $1.8 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Despite the pandemic, we generated $8.5 billion of cash from operating activities, yielding free cash flow of $3.2 billion after reductions of $2.7 billion for cash used in investing activities and $2.6 billion in dividends. Even though our share repurchase program was temporarily paused for six months starting in March 2020, we repurchased $3.7 billion of our shares. We have been, and we expect to continue to be, in compliance with our debt covenants. We have $2.0 billion of credit available under our revolving credit facility, up to $800 million undrawn on our Receivables Facility, and three bilateral revolving credit lines, which mature in May 2021, with up to $600 million of available credit. As of December 31, 2020, none of the revolving credit facility, Receivables Facility, or bilateral revolving credit lines was drawn.

·

2017 Adjusted Results Non-GAAP In 2017, we generated adjusted operating income of more than $7.8 billion, an 8% increase compared to 2016.  Volume growth of 2%, combined with core pricing and productivity gains, generated solid financial performance improvement and more than offset $86 million of operating expense associated with our workforce reduction plan implemented in the third quarter of 2017.  Our 2017 adjusted operating ratio was an all-time record 63.0%, improving 0.5 points from 2016. 

22


Adjusted net income of $4.6 billion translated into adjusted earnings of $5.79 per diluted share, a best-ever performance.

·

Freight Revenues – Our freight revenues increased 7% year-over-year to $19.8 billion driven by volume growth of 2%, higher fuel surcharge revenue, and core pricing gains. Growth in frac sand, coal, and intermodal shipments more than offset declines in grain, crude oil, finished vehicles, and rock shipments.

·

Fuel Prices – Our average price of diesel fuel in 2017 was $1.81 per gallon, an increase of 22% from 2016, as both crude oil and conversion spreads between crude oil and diesel increased in 2017. The higher price resulted in increased operating expenses of  $334 million (excluding any impact from year-over-year volume growth). Gross-ton miles increased 5%, which also drove higher fuel expense.  Our fuel consumption rate, computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles in thousands,  improved 2%.    

·

Free Cash Flow – Cash generated by operating activities totaled $7.2 billion, yielding free cash flow of $2.2 billion after reductions of $3.1 billion for cash used in investing activities and $2 billion in dividends, which included a 10% increase in our quarterly dividend per share from $0.605 to $0.665 declared and paid in the fourth quarter of 2017. Free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid.

Free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid. Free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe free cash flow is important to management and investors in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings.financing. Free cash flow should be considered in additionto, rather than as a substitute for, cash provided by operating activities. The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure) to free cash flow (non-GAAP measure):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Millions

2020

2019

2018

Cash provided by operating activities

Cash provided by operating activities

$

7,230 

$

7,525 

$

7,344 

Cash provided by operating activities

$

8,540 

$

8,609 

$

8,686 

Cash used in investing activities

Cash used in investing activities

 

(3,086)

 

(3,393)

 

(4,476)

Cash used in investing activities

(2,676)

(3,435)

(3,411)

Dividends paid

Dividends paid

 

(1,982)

 

(1,879)

 

(2,344)

Dividends paid

(2,626)

(2,598)

(2,299)

Free cash flow

Free cash flow

$

2,162 

$

2,253 

$

524 

Free cash flow

$

3,238 

$

2,576 

$

2,976 

20182021 Outlook

·

Safety – Operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents: our employees, customers, shareholders and the communities we serve.  We will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety, utilizing technology, risk assessment, training and employee engagement, quality control, and targeted capital investments.  We will continue using and expanding the deployment of Total Safety Culture and Courage to Care throughout our operations, which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety.  We will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects; improve or close crossings; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs (including risk assessment strategies), industry programs and local community activities across our network.

·

Network Operations – In 2018, we will continue to align resources with customer demand, maintain an efficient network, and ensure surge capability of our assets.

·

Fuel Prices – Fuel price projections for crude oil and natural gas continue to fluctuate in the current environment.  We again could see volatile fuel prices during the year, as they are sensitive to global and U.S. domestic demand, refining capacity, geopolitical events, weather conditions and other factors.  As prices fluctuate, there will be a timing impact on earnings, as our fuel surcharge programs trail increases or decreases in fuel price by approximately two months.

LowerSafety – Operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents: our employees, customers, shareholders, and the communities we serve. We will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety utilizing technology, risk assessments, training, employee engagement, quality control, and targeted capital investments. We will continue using and expanding the deployment of Total Safety Culture, Courage to Care, COMMIT, and Peer to Peer throughout our operations, which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety. We formed an Operating Practices Command Center to identify causes of mainline service interruptions and develop solutions, in addition to, assisting employees with understanding policies, procedures, and best practices for handling trains. We will continue our efforts to utilize data to identify and mitigate risk, detect rail defects, improve or close crossings, and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through

26


a combination of our own programs (including risk assessment strategies), industry programs, and local community activities across the network.

Network Operations – In 2021, we will continue to transform our railroad to further increase reliability of our service product, reduce variability in network operations, and improve resource utilization. Continued implementation of train length initiatives will allow us to add incremental volume growth to our existing train network. We will continue to make structural changes to improve operational performance and efficiency. A more efficient network requires fewer locomotives, freight cars, and other resources.

Market Conditions – We expect uncertainties with COVID-19 and the economy to continue in 2021. How governments and consumers react to the resurgence, mutation of the virus, and distribution of the vaccine could result in or contribute to customer disruptions, an elongated recovery period, or a downturn from our current business levels. Disruptions in our customers’ supply chains caused by the pandemic or other factors may have an impact on our shipments. In addition, other factors such as natural gas prices, weather conditions, and demand for other energy sources may impact the coal market; crude oil price spreads may drive demand for petroleum products and drilling materials; available truck capacity could impact our intermodal business; and international trade agreements could promote or hinder trade.

Fuel Prices – Projections for crude oil and natural gas continue to fluctuate in the current environment. We again could see volatile fuel prices during the year, as they are sensitive to global and U.S. domestic demand, refining capacity, geopolitical events, weather conditions, and other factors. As prices fluctuate, there will be a timing impact on earnings, as our fuel surcharge programs trail increases or decreases in fuel price by approximately two months.

Significant changes in fuel prices could have a positivean impact on the economy by increasingamount of consumer discretionary spending, that potentially could increaseimpacting demand for various consumer products that we transport. Alternatively, lower fuel pricesthose changes could likely have a negativean inverse impact on other commodities such as coal, petroleum products, and domestic drilling-related shipments.

Capital PlanIn 2021, we expect our capital plan to be approximately $2.9 billion, essentially flat with 2020. Implementation of our new transportation plan has generated capacity. We will continue to harden our infrastructure, replace older assets, and improve the safety and resilience of the network. In addition, the plan includes investments intended to support growth and improve productivity and operational efficiency. The capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments. (See further discussion in this Item 7 under Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Plan).

Financial Expectations – We expect volume to be up four to as high as six percent in 2021 compared to 2020, provided the second half of the year’s industrial production strengthens as predicted by economists. In the current environment, we expect continued margin improvement driven by pricing opportunities in excess of inflation and ongoing productivity initiatives, resulting in approximately $500 million of productivity savings, while better leveraging our resources and strengthening our franchise. We expect to generate strong cash from operating activities along with maintaining our dividend and share repurchase program. As the continued effect of COVID-19 is still uncertain, it could have a material impact on our 2021 financial and operating results, but our focus will be on what we can manage, such as increasing productivity; seeking new business opportunities; protecting our employees, customers, and communities; and providing excellent service to our customers.

23

27


·

Capital Plan  – In 2018, we expect our capital plan to be approximately $3.3 billion, up around 5% compared to 2017. The plan includes expenditures to renew and improve our existing infrastructure as well as new capacity investments, including initial construction work on a new classification yard in our Southern Region. In addition, expenditures will be made for PTC, locomotives, intermodal containers and chassis, and freight cars. We expect to take delivery of approximately 60 new locomotives in 2018, which will complete our multi-year purchase commitments. The capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments. (See further discussion in this Item 7 under Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Plan.)

·

Financial Expectations – Economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels.  We expect volume to grow in the low single digit range in 2018 compared to 2017, but it will depend on the overall economy and market conditions.  One of the more significant uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets, which will bring both challenges and opportunities.  In the current environment, we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities, ongoing productivity initiatives, and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise. Over the longer term, we expect the overall U.S. economy to continue to improve at a modest pace, with some markets outperforming others.

·

Tax Reform –  The Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017.  The Tax Act reduced the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.  Due to the tax rate change, we expect to generate additional cash from operations in 2018 of approximately $1 billion, assuming normal business conditions prevail.  We will continue to evaluate the best use of that cash, which will include pursuing capital projects with adequate returns, and returning cash to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change 

% Change

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020

2019 

2018

2020 v 2019 

2019 v 2018 

Freight revenues

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

$

20,397 

%

(9)

%

$

18,251 

$

20,243 

$

21,384 

(10)

%

(5)

%

Other revenues

 

1,403 

 

1,340 

 

1,416 

%

(5)

%

Other subsidiary revenues

743 

880 

881 

(16)

-

Accessorial revenues

473 

514 

502 

(8)

Other

66 

71 

65 

(7)

Total

$

21,240 

$

19,941 

$

21,813 

%

(9)

%

$

19,533 

$

21,708 

$

22,832 

(10)

%

(5)

%

We generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our sixthree commodity groups. Prior to 2020, we reported on four commodity groups, thus prior years’ freight revenue, average revenue per car (ARC), and carloadings have been realigned to the new reporting format. Freight revenues vary with volume (carloads) and average revenue per car (ARC).ARC. Changes in price, traffic mix, and fuel surcharges drive ARC. We provide some of our customers with contractualCustomer incentives, which are primarily provided for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and to/from specific locations which we record as reductions to freight revenuesor based on cumulative volumes, are recorded as a reduction to operating revenues. Customer incentives that include variable consideration based on cumulative volumes are estimated using the actual or projected future shipments.expected value method, which is based on available historical, current, and forecasted volumes, and recognized as the related performance obligation is satisfied. We recognize freight revenues over time as shipments move from origin to destination. We allocate freight revenuesThe allocation of revenue between reporting periods is based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognizewith expenses recognized as we incur them.incurred.

Other revenues includeconsist primarily of revenues earned by our other subsidiaries revenues from(primarily logistics and commuter rail operations that we manage,operations) and accessorial revenues. Other subsidiary revenues which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services suchare generally recognized over time as switching or storage, and miscellaneous contract revenue. We recognize othershipments move from origin to destination. The allocation of revenue between reporting periods is based on the relative transit time in each reporting period with expenses recognized as incurred. Accessorial revenues are recognized at a point in time as we perform services or meet contractual obligations.performance obligations are satisfied.

Freight revenues increased 7%decreased 10% year-over-year to $19.8$18.3 billion driven by volume growth of 2%, higher fuel surcharge revenue, and core pricing gains. Growth in frac sand, coal, and intermodal shipments more than offset declines in grain, crude oil, finished vehicles, and rock shipments.

Freight revenues decreased 9% in 2016 compared to 2015 due to a 7% volume decline, in carloadings, and lower fuel surcharge, revenue,and negative mix of traffic, partially offset by core pricing gains. Volume declinesdeclined in almost every market segment due to the deteriorating economic conditions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. While some markets rebounded in the fourth quarter, particularly grain and intermodal, others still lagged 2019 levels. Shipments of coal, intermodal, frac sand, and petroleum products continue to be negatively impacted by low crude oil finished vehicles, and metals shipments more than offset volume growth in grain, automotive parts, and industrial chemicals shipments.natural gas prices.

24


Our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $966 million, $560 million,almost $1.0 billion and $1.3$1.6 billion in 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015,2019, respectively. Fuel surcharge revenue in 2017 increased $4062020 decreased $586 million as a result of a 22% increase30% decrease in fuel price and 2% growth in carloadings.  Fuel surcharge revenue in 2016 decreased $740 million as a result of a 20% decrease in fuel price, a 7% reduction in carloadings, andpartially offset by the lag impact on fuel surcharge (it can generally take up to two months for changing fuel prices to affect fuel surchargesurcharges recoveries).

In 2017,2020, other revenue increasedsubsidiary revenues decreased from 2016 due to higher revenues2019 driven by the disruption of the automotive supply chain, which drove lower intermodal shipments and revenue at our subsidiaries primarily those that broker intermodal, transload, and refrigerated warehousing logistics services. 

In 2016, other revenue decreased from 2015 due to lower revenues at our subsidiaries, primarily those that broker intermodal and transload services, and lower intermodal accessoriallogistics services. Accessorial revenue and demurrage fees. other revenue declined driven by lower industrial products traffic.

28


The following tables summarize the year-over-year changes in freight revenues, revenue carloads, and ARC by commodity type:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Freight Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change

% Change

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020

2019

2018

2020 v 2019

2019 v 2018

Agricultural Products

$

3,685 

$

3,625 

$

3,581 

%

%

Grain & grain products

$

2,829 

$

2,776 

$

2,756 

%

%

Fertilizer

660 

653 

641 

Food & refrigerated

937 

1,008 

1,065 

(7)

(5)

Coal & renewables

1,534 

2,092 

2,607 

(27)

(20)

Bulk

5,960 

6,529 

7,069 

(9)

(8)

Industrial chemicals & plastics

1,845 

1,885 

1,828 

(2)

Metals & minerals

1,580 

2,042 

2,521 

(23)

(19)

Forest products

1,160 

1,160 

1,209 

-

(4)

Energy & specialized markets

2,037 

2,385 

2,131 

(15)

12 

Industrial

6,622 

7,472 

7,689 

(11)

(3)

Automotive

 

1,998 

 

2,000 

 

2,154 

 -

 

(7)

 

1,680 

2,123 

2,172 

(21)

(2)

Chemicals

 

3,596 

 

3,474 

 

3,543 

 

(2)

 

Coal

 

2,645 

 

2,440 

 

3,237 

 

(25)

 

Industrial Products

 

4,078 

 

3,348 

 

3,808 22 

 

(12)

 

Intermodal

 

3,835 

 

3,714 

 

4,074 

 

(9)

 

3,989 

4,119 

4,454 

(3)

(8)

Premium

5,669 

6,242 

6,626 

(9)

(6)

Total

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

$

20,397 

%

(9)

%

$

18,251 

$

20,243 

$

21,384 

(10)

%

(5)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue Carloads

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change

% Change

Thousands

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020

2019

2018

2020 v 2019

2019 v 2018

Agricultural Products

 

958 

 

980 

 

941 (2)

%

%

Grain & grain products

745 

708 

723 

%

(2)

%

Fertilizer

193 

190 

194 

(2)

Food & refrigerated

185 

192 

206 

(4)

(7)

Coal & renewables

797 

997 

1,176 

(20)

(15)

Bulk

1,920 

2,087 

2,299 

(8)

(9)

Industrial chemicals & plastics

587 

611 

599 

(4)

Metals & minerals

646 

744 

822 

(13)

(9)

Forest products

220 

220 

241 

-

(9)

Energy & specialized markets

539 

624 

565 

(14)

10 

Industrial

1,992 

2,199 

2,227 

(9)

(1)

Automotive

 

838 

 

863 

 

863 (3)

 

 -

 

692 

858 

891 

(19)

(4)

Chemicals

 

1,055 

 

1,074 

 

1,098 (2)

 

(2)

 

Coal

 

1,232 

 

1,166 

 

1,459 

 

(20)

 

Industrial Products

 

1,227 

 

1,097 

 

1,213 12 

 

(10)

 

Intermodal [a]

 

3,278 

 

3,262 

 

3,488 

 -

 

(6)

 

3,149 

3,202 

3,491 

(2)

(8)

Premium

3,841 

4,060 

4,382 

(5)

(7)

Total

 

8,588 

 

8,442 

 

9,062 

%

(7)

%

7,753 

8,346 

8,908 

(7)

%

(6)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change

% Change

Average Revenue per Car

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020

2019

2018

2020 v 2019

2019 v 2018

Agricultural Products

$

3,847 

$

3,702 

$

3,805 

%

(3)

%

Grain & grain products

$

3,797 

$

3,919 

$

3,811 

(3)

%

%

Fertilizer

3,427 

3,448 

3,303 

(1)

Food & refrigerated

5,047 

5,241 

5,171 

(4)

Coal & renewables

1,926 

2,098 

2,216 

(8)

(5)

Bulk

3,104 

3,128 

3,074 

(1)

Industrial chemicals & plastics

3,144 

3,087 

3,049 

Metals & minerals

2,445 

2,745 

3,067 

(11)

(10)

Forest products

5,269 

5,264 

5,025 

-

Energy & specialized markets

3,780 

3,821 

3,772 

(1)

Industrial

3,324 

3,398 

3,452 

(2)

(2)

Automotive

 

2,384 

 

2,317 

 

2,498 

 

(7)

 

2,427 

2,474 

2,438 

(2)

Chemicals

 

3,410 

 

3,234 

 

3,227 

 

 -

 

Coal

 

2,146 

 

2,092 

 

2,218 

 

(6)

 

Industrial Products

 

3,324 

 

3,051 

 

3,139 

 

(3)

 

Intermodal [a]

 

1,170 

 

1,138 

 

1,168 

 

(3)

 

1,267 

1,286 

1,276 

(1)

Premium

1,476 

1,538 

1,512 

(4)

Average

$

2,310 

$

2,203 

$

2,251 

%

(2)

%

$

2,354 

$

2,425 

$

2,400 

(3)

%

%

[a]For intermodal shipments, each container or trailer equals one carload.

29


[a]

Each intermodal container or trailer equals one carload.

25


Agricultural ProductsBulkBulk includes shipments of grain and grain products, fertilizer, food and refrigerated goods, and coal and renewables. Freight revenue from agricultural products increasedbulk shipments decreased in 2020 compared to 2016 driven by core pricing gains2019 due to an 8% volume decline and higherlower fuel surcharge revenue, partially offset by a 2% decreasepositive business mix and core pricing gains. Continued softness in market conditions due to low natural gas prices and weak export demand drove the 21% decline in coal shipments. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted production of imported beer, food products, and the demand for ethanol and related products contributing to additional declines in volume. GrainStrong demand for export grain, particularly in the fourth quarter, partially offset the losses.

2020 Bulk Carloads

Picture 2

Industrial – Industrial includes shipments of industrial chemicals and grain productplastics, metals and minerals, forest products, and energy and specialized markets. Freight revenue from industrial shipments decreased 3% in 2017 compared to 2016.  Strong export demand for wheat drove2020 versus 2019 due a 9% decline in volume, growthnegative mix of traffic, and lower fuel surcharge, partially offset by pricing gains. Although volume from industrial shipments were up in the first halfquarter, it was not enough to overcome the weak demand throughout the rest of the year which was more than offset byas the pandemic impacted a wide range of industries driving year-over-year declines in many of grainour market segments including industrial chemicals, rock, soda ash, and steel. In addition, low oil prices, resulting in lower drilling, coupled with local sand impacts were the primary drivers behind the 57% decline in sand shipments and 26% decline in the second halfpetroleum product shipments compared to 2019.

Premium – Premium includes shipments of the year due to an abundance of global supply reducing U.S. grain competitiveness.

finished automobiles, automotive parts, and merchandise in intermodal containers, both domestic and international. Freight revenue from agricultural products increased in 2016 compared to 2015 driven by

2017 Agricultural Products Carloads

volume growth and core pricing gains, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue and mix of traffic.  Grain shipments increased 11% in 2016 compared to 2015 due to strong export demand in the second half of the year.  Market conditions in South America and ample supply of U.S. grains led to competitive U.S. pricing relative to the global market.

Automotive –  Freight revenue from automotive shipments was flat compared to 2016 as core pricing gains and higher fuel surcharge revenue were offset by a 3% decline in volume and mix of traffic.  Finished vehicle shipments fell 7% for the year resulting from lower domestic sales and reduced production for certain manufacturers.  Automotive parts shipments grew 1% driven by continued growth in truck-to-rail conversions.    

Freight revenue from automotivepremium shipments decreased in 20162020 compared to 2015 as2019 due to a result of5% volume decline, lower fuel surcharge revenuesurcharges, and negative mix of traffic, partially offset by core pricing gains. Volume was flatdeclines in international intermodal due to trade uncertainty and the COVID-19 impact on supply chains between Asia and the U.S., along with the temporary automotive production halt, drove the decline in premium shipments compared to 2015 as a 7%

2017 Automotive Carloads

growth in automotive parts from truck-to-rail conversions was offset by a 5% decrease in finished vehicles resulting from a partial contract loss during the year. Overall U.S. vehicle production was flat compared to 2015.

Chemicals – Freight revenue from chemical shipments increased in 2017 versus 2016 due to core pricing gains, higher fuel surcharge revenue, and mix of traffic, which2019. These declines were partially offset by a 2% decrease in volume.  Crude oil shipments declined significantly through the third quarter, resulting from continued low crude oil prices, regional pricing differencescontract wins and available pipeline capacity.  Conversely, shipments of refined petroleum products grew due to stronger demand.  Fertilizer shipments also increased as a result of continued strength in potash exports.e-commerce parcel shipments.

Freight revenue from chemical shipments declined in 2016 versus 2015 due to volume

2017 Chemicals2020 Industrial Carloads

Picture 20

2020 Premium Carloads

Picture 23

declines and lower fuel surcharge revenue, which were partially offset by core pricing gains.  Crude oil shipments declined significantly resulting from continued low crude oil prices, regional pricing differences and available pipeline capacity.  Fertilizer shipments also declined due to weak world-wide demand for potash in the first half of the year and the strong U.S. dollar.  These decreases were partially offset by growth in industrial chemical and liquid petroleum gas shipments.

26


Coal –  Freight revenue from coal shipments increased in 2017 compared to 2016 driven by volume growth, mix of traffic, and higher fuel surcharge revenue.    Shipments out of the Powder River Basin (PRB) grew 5% in 2017 driven by strong growth in the first half of the year due to higher year-over-year natural gas prices and lower inventory levels at utilities.  Shipments out of Colorado and Utah increased 7% compared to 2016 due to the same drivers, combined with stronger export demand.

Lower volume, lower fuel surcharge revenue, and mix of traffic resulted in a decline in freight revenue from coal shipments in 2016 compared

2017 Coal Carloads

to 2015.  Shipments out of the Powder River Basin (PRB) declined 24% in 2016 due to high inventory levels at utilities and competitive natural gas prices. Shipments out of Colorado and Utah declined 15% compared to 2015 due to the same drivers, combined with lower international demand.

Industrial Products – Freight revenue from industrial products shipments increased in 2017 compared to 2016 due to a 12% increase in volume, core pricing gains, higher fuel surcharge revenue, and mix of traffic.  Increased shale drilling activity and proppant intensity per drilling well drove substantial volume growth in frac sand shipments.  Conversely, rock shipments declined 7% due to inclement weather in the West in the first half of the year, combined with decreased construction activity in Texas. 

Freight revenue from industrial products shipments decreased in 2016 compared to 2015

2017 Industrial Products Carloads

due to volume declines, lower fuel surcharge revenue, and mix of traffic partially offset by core pricing gains. Declines in shale drilling activity, due to lower oil prices, negatively impacted non-metallic mineral (frac sand) shipments compared to 2015.  Rock shipments also decreased as weather events and flooding in the Southern Region during the second and third quarters limited construction activity, thus limiting demand for transportation of materials.  In addition, steel shipments declined as a result of reductions in shale drilling activity and strong import levels associated with the strength of the U.S. dollar.

Intermodal – Freight revenue from intermodal shipments increased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to higher fuel surcharge revenue and core pricing gains.  Volume was flat versus 2016, as a 1% growth in international shipments was muted by flat domestic shipments due to available truck capacity during most of 2017, offsetting a strong holiday shipping season in the fourth quarter.

Freight revenue from intermodal shipments decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to lower volume and lower fuel surcharge revenue, which were partially offset by core pricing gains. Volume levels from international and domestic traffic decreased 11% and 2%, respectively,

2017 Intermodal Carloads

compared to last year due to weaker global trade activity, softer domestic sales, high retail inventories, and a customer bankruptcy.    

27


Mexico Business– Each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from Mexico. Freight revenueRevenue from Mexico business was $2.3$2.1 billion in 2017, up 2%2020, down 10% compared to 2016.  Core pricing gains2019, driven by a 12% decline in volume and higherlower fuel surcharge revenue, more thanpartially offset the 1%by core pricing gains. The volume decline. The decrease in volumedecline was driven by lowerthe COVID-19 pandemic with declines in automotive and intermodal shipments, of automotive parts, partially offset by growthincreases in coalLPG, beer, and refined petroleum products shipments.grain.

Freight revenue from Mexico business was $2.2 billion in 2016, flat with 2015.  Lower fuel surcharge revenue and mix of traffic offset the 4% of volume growth and core pricing gains.  Volume growth was driven by Agricultural Products, Coal, and automotive parts shipments.30


Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change 

% Change

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020 

2019

2018

2020 v 2019 

2019 v 2018

Compensation and benefits

$

4,984 

$

4,750 

$

5,161 

%

(8)

%

$

3,993 

$

4,533 

$

5,056 

(12)

%

(10)

%

Depreciation

2,210 

2,216 

2,191 

-

Purchased services and materials

 

2,363 

 

2,258 

 

2,421 

 

(7)

 

1,962 

2,254 

2,443 

(13)

(8)

Depreciation

 

2,105 

 

2,038 

 

2,012 

 

 

Fuel

 

1,891 

 

1,489 

 

2,013 27 

 

(26)

 

1,314 

2,107 

2,531 

(38)

(17)

Equipment and other rents

 

888 

 

1,137 

 

1,230 (22)

 

(8)

 

875 

984 

1,072 

(11)

(8)

Other

 

948 

 

997 

 

924 (5)

 

 

1,345 

1,060 

1,022 

27 

Total

$

13,179 

$

12,669 

$

13,761 

%

(8)

%

$

11,699 

$

13,154 

$

14,315 

(11)

%

(8)

%

Operating expenses increased $510 milliondecreased $1.5 billion in 20172020 compared to 20162019 driven by higherproductivity improvements, lower fuel prices, inflation, $86 million of expenses related to the third quarter workforce reduction plan, depreciation, contract services,cost savings from lower volume, and volume-relatedlower destroyed equipment and freight costs. Partially offsetting these increases wasdecreases compared to 2019 are a $212$278 million impairment charge, inflation, increased bad debt expense, and higher state and local taxes. In addition, expenses were positively impacted by lower year-over-year weather-related costs, partially offset by an employment tax refund recognized in 2019. Full year results for 2020 and 2019 both include a $25 million reduction to operatingof expense related to income tax adjustments at certain equity-method affiliates, continued productivity gains, lower locomotive and freight car lease expense, and lower environmental, personal injury, and joint facility costs. for 2019 weather-related insurance reimbursements.

Operating expenses decreased $1.1 billion in 2016 compared to 2015 driven by lower fuel

2017 2020 Operating Expenses

Picture 18

prices, volume-related savings, productivity gains and lower locomotive and freight car maintenance expense.  These cost reductions were partially offset by inflation, depreciation, and higher environmental and other costs.

Compensation and Benefits – Compensation and benefits include wages, payroll taxes, health and welfare costs, pension costs, other postretirement benefits, and incentive costs. In 2017,2020, expenses increased 5%decreased 12% compared to 2016, driven by general wage2019, due to productivity initiatives; declines in carload volumes; lower weather-related costs; management’s actions responding to the sharp decline in volume, including three months of temporary unpaid leave and benefit inflation, $86 millionsalary reductions, and almost 6 months of expenses associated with the workforce reduction plan, volume-related costs,large shop closures (a locomotive shop, a freight car shop, and higher training expenses for trainmen, which werea maintenance-of-way shop); partially offset by resource productivity gains.wage inflation, an employment tax refund recognized in 2019, and a one-time bonus payment for agreement employees who worked during the pandemic. Severance costs were relatively flat year-over-year.

In 2016, expenses decreased 8%Depreciation – The majority of depreciation relates to road property, including rail, ties, ballast, and other track material. Depreciation expense was essentially flat in 2020 compared to 2015, driven by lower volume-related costs, productivity gains, and lower training expense.  General wage and benefit inflation partially offset these decreases.2019.

Purchased Services and Materials – Expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers (including equipment maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services); materials used to maintain the Railroad’s lines, structures, and equipment; costs of operating facilities jointly used by UPRR and other railroads; transportation and lodging for train crew employees; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers; leased automobile maintenance expenses; and tools and supplies. Purchased services and materials increased 5%decreased 13% in 20172020 compared to 2016 primarily2019 driven by reductions in all of the following: locomotive maintenance expenses due to a smaller active fleet, volume-related costs (including higher subsidiary contract services)for intermodal and Hurricane Harvey-related contract servicetransload services incurred by our subsidiaries, costs which were partially offset by lower joint facility expenses.for transportation for the train crews, professional services expense, costs associated with derailments, and year-over-year weather-related costs.

28


Purchased services and materials in 2016 decreased 7% compared to 2015 primarily due to lower volume-related costs and lower locomotive and freight car repair and maintenance expenses. 

Fuel – Fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment. Locomotive diesel fuel prices, which averaged $1.811.50 per gallon (including taxes and transportation costs) in 2017,2020, compared to $1.48$2.13 per gallon in 2016, increased2019, decreased expenses $334 million. In addition, fuel costs were higher as gross-ton miles increased5% compared to 2016.  The$539 million (excluding any impact from year-over-year volume declines). Gross ton-miles decreased 9% and our fuel consumption rate, (c-rate), computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles, in thousands, improved 2% compared to 2016.  , which both drove lower fuel expense.

Locomotive diesel fuel prices, which averaged $1.48 per gallon (including taxes and transportation costs) in 2016, compared to $1.84 per gallon in 2015, reduced expenses $347 million. In addition, fuel costs were lower as gross-ton miles decreased 8%. The fuel consumption rate (c-rate), computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles in thousands, improved 1% compared to 2015.

31


Depreciation – The majority of depreciation relates to road property, including rail, ties, ballast, and other track material.  A higher depreciable asset base, reflecting recent years’ higher capital spending, increased depreciation expense in 2017 compared to 2016. This increase was partially offset by our recent depreciation studies that resulted in lower depreciation rates for some asset classes. 

A larger depreciable asset base, reflecting higher capital spending in recent years, increased depreciation expense in 2016 compared to 2015. This increase was partially offset by our recent depreciation studies that resulted in lower depreciation rates for some asset classes.  

Equipment and Other Rents – Equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the Railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies; freight car, intermodal, and locomotive leases; and office and other rent expenses. Equityexpenses, offset by equity income from certain equity method investments is also included.investments. Equipment and other rents expense decreased $249 million11% compared to 2016.  $212 million of the reduction was due to income tax adjustments at certain equity-method affiliates. Lower locomotive and2019 driven by improved freight car velocity, volume declines, and lease expense also contributed to the year-over-year decrease.  Conversely, increased car rent expense due to volume growth in certain marketsreturns, partially offset these decreases.by lower equity income.

Equipment and other rents expense decreased $93 million in 2016 compared to 2015 as lower volume levels drove a reduction in car hire and locomotive lease expenses.

Other – Other expenses include state and local taxes, freight, equipment and property damage, utilities, insurance, personal injury, environmental, employee travel, telephone and cellular, computer software, bad debt, and other general expenses. Other expenses decreased 5%increased 27% in 20172020 compared to 20162019 as a result of lower environmental and personal injury expenses, and highera $278 million non-cash impairment charge related to our Brazos yard investment. Increased bad debt expense, in 2016 resulting from a customer bankruptcy.  Conversely, increased costs associated with destroyed equipment owned by third parties, and higher property and damaged freight costs partially offset these decreases.

Other expenses increased 8% in 2016 compared to 2015 as a result of higher environmental costs, state and local taxes, bad debt expense (customer bankruptcy),lower equity income from our investment in Grupo Ferroviaro Mexicano, and the write-offwrite offs of certain in-progress capital projects thatand lease impairments, were cancelled.  These cost increases were partiallyalmost completely offset by lower expenses for damagedcosts associated with freight property,loss and equipment not owned by the Company. damage, employee travel, and destroyed equipment.

Non-Operating Items

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change

% Change

% Change

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

2020

2019

2018

2020 v 2019

2019 v 2018

Other income

$

290 

$

192 

$

226 51 

%

(15)

%

$

287 

$

243 

$

94 

18 

%

F

%

Interest expense

 

(719)

 

(698)

 

(622)

 

12 

 

(1,141)

(1,050)

(870)

21 

Income tax benefit/(expense)

 

3,080 

 

(2,533)

 

(2,884)

F

 

(12)

%

Income tax expense

(1,631)

(1,828)

(1,775)

(11)

Other Income – Other income increased in 20172020 compared to 2016 primarily as a result of a $65 million gain on a litigation settlement for back rent and a $57 million2019 due to larger gains from real estate sale gain, both recognized in the third quarter of 2017.  Rental income also increased in 2017 compared to 2016.

29


Other income decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to large real estate transactions:sales, including a $113$69 million gain from a real estateland and permanent easement sale in 2015,to the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, partially offset by $67$31 million of gains from two real estate sales in 2016.interest income associated with an employment tax refund in 2019 and lower interest income.

Interest Expense – Interest expense increased in 20172020 compared to 20162019 due to an increased weighted-average debt level of $15.9$27.9 billion in 20172020 from $15.0$24.8 billion in 2016,2019, partially offset by the impact of a lower effective interest rate of 4.6%4.1% in 20172020 compared to 4.7%4.3 % in 2016. 2019.

InterestIncome Taxes – Income tax expense increaseddecreased in 20162020 compared to 20152019 due to an increased weighted-average debt level of $15.0 billion in 2016 from $13.0 billion in 2015, partially offset by the impact of a lower effective interest rate of 4.7% in 2016 compared to 4.8% in 2015.

Income Taxes –  Income taxes were a benefit of $3.1 billion in 2017 compared to expense of $2.5 billion in 2016.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted on December 22, 2017.  The Tax Act reduced the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.  As a result, we remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities which resulted in a $5.9 billion non-cash reduction in our income tax expense in 2017.  Higher pre-tax income and an increase in the State of Illinois corporate tax rate effective July 1, 2017 modestly offset the impact of the deferred tax adjustment.income. Our effective tax raterates for 2017 was (40.4%) compared to 37.4% in 2016.    2020 and 2019 were 23.4% and 23.6%, respectively.


Lower pre-tax income decreased income taxes in 2016 compared to 2015. Our effective tax rate for 2016 was 37.4% compared to 37.7% in 2015.

32


OTHER OPERATING/PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL STATISTICS

We report a number of key performance measures weekly to the Association of American Railroads.STB. We provide this data on our website at www.up.com/investor/aar-stb_reports/index.htm.

Operating/Performance Statistics

Management continuously measures these key operating metrics to evaluate our productivity, asset utilization, and network efficiency in striving to provide a consistent, reliable service product to our customers.

Railroad performance measures are included in the table below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

% Change

% Change



 

2017 2016 2015 

2017 v 2016

2016 v 2015

Average train speed (miles per hour)

25.4 26.6 25.4 (5)

%

%

Average terminal dwell time (hours)

30.3 28.1 29.3 

%

(4)

%

Gross ton-miles (billions)

898.7 856.9 927.7 

%

(8)

%

Revenue ton-miles (billions)

466.7 440.1 485.0 

%

(9)

%

Operating ratio

62.0 63.5 63.1 (1.5)

pts

0.4 

pts

Employees (average)

41,992 42,919 47,457 (2)

%

(10)

%

% Change

% Change

2020

2019

2018

2020 v 2019

2019 v 2018

Gross ton-miles (GTMs) (billions)

771.8 

846.6 

928.6 

(9)

%

(9)

%

Revenue ton-miles (billions)

385.0 

423.4 

474.0 

(9)

(11)

Freight car velocity (daily miles per car) [a]

221 

209 

198 

Average train speed (miles per hour) [b]

25.9 

25.1 

26.1 

(4)

Average terminal dwell time (hours) [b]

22.7 

24.8 

29.8 

(8)

(17)

Locomotive productivity (GTMs per horsepower day)

137 

120 

106 

14 

13 

Train length (feet)

8,798 

7,747 

7,036 

14 

10 

Intermodal car trip plan compliance (%)

81 

75 

71 

pts

pts

Manifest/Automotive car trip plan compliance (%)

71 

65 

57 

pts

pts

Workforce productivity (car miles per employee)

947 

857 

839 

11 

Total employees (average)

30,960 

37,483 

41,967 

(17)

(11)

Operating ratio

59.9 

60.6 

62.7 

(0.7)

pts

(2.1)

pts

Average Train Speed –  Average train speed is calculated by dividing train miles by hours operated on our main lines between terminals.  Average train speed, as[a] Prior years have been recast to conform to the current year presentation which reflects minor refinements.

[b] As reported to the Association of American Railroads, declined 5% in 2017 compared to 2016 as disruptions across our network, including the impact of Hurricane Harvey, negatively impacted network fluidity.  Continued implementation and testing of Positive Train Control across a growing number of routes in our network combined with operational challenges also negatively impacted overall average train speed. STB.

Average train speed improved 5% in 2016 compared to 2015.  Velocity gains resulted from lower volumes, improved network fluidity and a strong resource position.

Average Terminal Dwell Time – Average terminal dwell time is the average time that a rail car spends at our terminals. Lower average terminal dwell time improves asset utilization and service. Average terminal dwell time increased 8% in 2017 compared to 2016 resulting from network disruptions and operational challenges which negatively impacted network fluidity.

Average terminal dwell time improved 4% in 2016 compared to 2015, reflecting the impact of lower volume and improved network operations.

Gross and Revenue Ton-Miles – Gross ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of loaded and empty freight cars by the number of miles hauled. Revenue ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the

30


weight of freight by the number of tariff miles. Gross ton-miles and revenue ton-miles increased 5% and 6%, respectivelyboth decreased 9% in 20172020 compared to 2016, resulting from2019, driven by a 2% increase7% decline in carloads.carloadings. Changes in commodity mix drove the variancesvariance in year-over-year increasesdecreases between gross ton-miles, revenue ton-miles, and carloads.

Gross ton-milesFreight Car Velocity – Freight car velocity measures the average daily miles per car on our network. The two key drivers of this metric are the speed of the train between terminals (average train speed) and revenue ton-miles decreased 8%the time a rail car spends at the terminals (average terminal dwell time). Continued implementation of our new operating plan was the primary driver of the improvement from 2019 as both average terminal dwell and 9%, respectively in 2016average train speed improved compared to 2015, resulting from2020. Average terminal dwell time decreased compared to 2019 largely due to improved terminal processes, transportation plan changes to eliminate switches, and reduced carload volumes due to COVID-19. Average train speed in 2020 improved as weather-related challenges slowed trains in the first half of 2019. Train speed remained relatively flat year-over-year in the second half of the year.

Locomotive Productivity – Locomotive productivity is gross ton-miles per average daily locomotive horsepower. Locomotive productivity increased 14% in 2020 compared to 2019 driven by a 24% reduction in our average active fleet size due to transportation plan changes and lower locomotive dwell times.

Train Length – Train length is the average maximum train length on a route measured in feet. Our train length increased 14% compared to 2019 as a result of blending service products, transportation plan changes, and completing 36 siding extension projects.

Car Trip Plan Compliance Car trip plan compliance is the percentage of cars delivered on time in accordance with our original trip plan. Our network trip plan compliance is broken into the intermodal and manifest products. Intermodal trip plan compliance improved versus 2019, due to improved train speed and reduced dwell at our origin and destination ramps. Manifest car trip plan compliance improved compared to 2019 due to improved car dwell in our yards, increased train velocity across the network, and more

33


reliable first and last mile service. Both metrics were aided by reduced carload volumes due to COVID-19 and milder weather.

Workforce Productivity – Workforce productivity is average daily car miles per employee. Workforce productivity improved 11%, reaching an all-time record as average daily car miles decreased 9% while employees decreased 17% compared to 2019. Lower volumes drove the decline in average daily car miles. The 17% decline in employee levels was driven by productivity initiatives, a 7% decreasedecline in carloads. Changes in commodity mix drovecarload volumes, and a smaller capital workforce. At the variances in year-over-year declines between gross ton-miles, revenue ton-miles and carloads.end of the year, approximately 4,100 employees across all crafts were furloughed.

Operating Ratio – Operating ratio is our operating expenses reflected as a percentage of operating revenue. Our operating ratio of 59.9% was an all-time record and improved 1.50.7 points to 62.0% in 2017 compared to 2016.  Income tax adjustments at our equity-method affiliates drove one point of the improvement.  Core pricing gains, volume leverage, and2019 mainly driven by productivity savings more than offset higher inflation, $86 million of costs associated with the workforce reduction plan, higherinitiatives, lower fuel prices, and other expenses to drive 0.5 points of operating ratio improvement.

Our operating ratio increased 0.4 points to 63.5% in 2016 compared to 2015. Core price improvements, network efficiencies, and productivity gainscore pricing gains; which were more thanpartially offset by the impacta negative mix of lower volume,traffic, a one-time impairment charge, inflation, and other costs. cost increases.

Employees – Employee levels decreased 2% in 2017 compared to 2016 driven by productivity gains, a smaller capital workforce, and fewer management and administrative personnel, which more than offset the impact of 2% volume growth.

Employee levels decreased 10% in 2016 compared to 2015,  driven by lower volume levels, productivity gains, a smaller capital workforce, and fewer transportation employees in training.

Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Percentages

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Average equity

$

22,394 

$

20,317 

$

20,946 

$

17,543 

$

19,276 

$

22,640 

Return on average common shareholders' equity

 

47.8% 

 

20.8% 

 

22.8% 

30.5%

30.7%

26.4%

Return on Invested Capital as Adjusted (ROIC)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Percentages

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Interest expense

 

719 

 

698 

 

622 

1,141 

1,050 

870 

Interest on present value of operating leases

 

105 

 

121 

 

135 

Interest on average operating lease liabilities

64 

76 

82 

Taxes on interest

 

(309)

 

(306)

 

(285)

(282)

(266)

(218)

Net operating profit after taxes as adjusted (a)

$

11,227 

$

4,746 

$

5,244 

$

6,272 

$

6,779 

$

6,700 

Average equity

$

22,394 

$

20,317 

$

20,946 

$

17,543 

$

19,276 

$

22,640 

Average debt

 

15,976 

 

14,604 

 

12,807 

25,965 

23,796 

19,668 

Average present value of operating leases

 

2,288 

 

2,581 

 

2,814 

Average operating lease liabilities

1,719 

2,052 

2,206 

Average invested capital as adjusted (b)

$

40,658 

$

37,502 

$

36,567 

$

45,227 

$

45,124 

$

44,514 

Return on invested capital as adjusted (a/b)

 

27.6% 

 

12.7% 

 

14.3% 

Return on Invested Capital as Adjusted

13.9%

15.0%

15.1%

ROIC is considered a non-GAAP financial measure by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of our long-term capital investments. In addition, we currently use ROIC as a performance criteria in determining certain elements of equity compensation for our executives. ROIC should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, other information provided in accordance with GAAP. The most comparable GAAP measure is Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity. The tables above provide reconciliations from return on average common shareholders’ equity to ROIC. Our 2017 ROICAt December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the incremental borrowing rate on operating leases was 3.7%.

34


Adjusted Debt / Adjusted EBITDA

Millions, Except Ratios

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

for the Twelve Months Ended

2020 

2019

2018

Net income

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Add:

Income tax expense

1,631 

1,828 

1,775 

Depreciation

2,210 

2,216 

2,191 

Interest expense

1,141 

1,050 

870 

EBITDA

$

10,331 

$

11,013 

$

10,802 

Adjustments:

Other income

(287)

(243)

(94)

Interest on operating lease liabilities

59 

68 

84 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

10,103 

$

10,838 

$

10,792 

Debt

$

26,729 

$

25,200 

$

22,391 

Operating lease liabilities

1,604 

1,833 

2,271 

Unfunded pension and OPEB,

net of taxes of $195, $124 and $135

637 

400 

456 

Adjusted debt

$

28,970 

$

27,433 

$

25,118 

Adjusted debt / Adjusted EBITDA

2.9 

2.5 

2.3 

Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and adjustments for other income and interest on present value of 27.6% increased compared to 2016, largely as a result the $5.9 billion reduction to our deferred tax liability, that was recognized as an income tax benefit in 2017 (See Note 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for

31


additional information).    Higher earnings from base operations also contributed to the increase, more than offsetting our higher invested capital base.

Net Return on Invested Capital as Adjusted (Net ROIC)

The table below reconciles ROIC as previously calculated to Net ROIC for items affecting comparability.



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

2017 

 

2016 

 

2015 

Return on invested capital as adjusted

 

27.6% 

 

12.7% 

 

14.3% 

Factors Affecting Comparability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments for Tax Cuts and Jobs Act [a]

 

(13.9)

 

N/A

 

N/A

Net Return on Invested Capital as Adjusted

 

13.7% 

 

12.7% 

 

14.3% 

[a]

Adjustments remove the impact of $5.9 billion and $139 million from both 12/31/17 Net Income and 12/31/17 Shareholders’ Equity.

Net ROICoperating leases) is considered a non-GAAP financial measure by SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of our long-term capital investments. We use Net ROICCompany’s ability to demonstrate year over year comparability for significant items. Net ROICsustain given debt levels (including leases) with the cash generated from operations. In addition, a comparable measure is used by rating agencies when reviewing the Company’s credit rating. Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, other information provided in accordance with GAAP.net income. The most comparable GAAP measure is Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity.

Debt to Capital



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Percentages

2017 2016 

Debt (a)

$

16,944 

$

15,007 

Equity

 

24,856 

 

19,932 

Capital (b)

$

41,800 

$

34,939 

Debt to capital (a/b)

 

40.5% 

 

43.0% 

Adjusted Debt to Capital



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Percentages

2017 2016 

Debt

$

16,944 

$

15,007 

Net present value of operating leases

 

2,140 

 

2,435 

Unfunded pension and OPEB, net of taxes of $238 and $261

 

396 

 

436 

Adjusted debt (a)

$

19,480 

$

17,878 

Equity

 

24,856 

 

19,932 

Adjusted capital (b)

$

44,336 

$

37,810 

Adjusted debt to capital (a/b)

 

43.9% 

 

47.3% 

Adjusted debt to capital is a non-GAAP financial measure under SEC Regulation G and Item 10 of SEC Regulation S-K, and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe this measure is important to management and investors in evaluating the total amount of leverage in our capital structure, including off-balance sheet lease obligations, which we generally incur in connection with financing the acquisition of locomotives and freight cars and certain facilities.  Operating leases were discounted using 4.6% and 4.7% at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The discount rate reflects our effective interest rate. We monitor the ratio of adjusted debt to capital as we manage our capital structure to balance cost-effective and efficient access to the capital markets with our overall cost of capital. Adjusted debt to capital should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, debt to capital. The tablestable above provideprovides reconciliations from debt to capitalnet income to adjusted debt to capital. Ouradjusted EBITDA. At December 31, 2017 debt to capital ratios decreased as a result of a $4.9 billion increase in equity from December 31, 2016.  The increase in equity is largely due to a $5.9 billion reduction to our deferred tax liability that2020, 2019, and 2018, the incremental borrowing rate on operating leases was recognized as an income tax benefit in 2017. 3.7%.

32


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

AsWe are continually evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on our financial condition and liquidity. Although the situation is fluid and highly uncertain, we continue to analyze a wide range of economic scenarios and the impact on our ability to generate cash. These analyses inform our liquidity plans and activity outlined below and indicate we have sufficient capacity to sustain an extended period of lower volumes.

At December 31, 2017,2020, we had a working capital surplus due to an increased cash balance held due to the uncertainty related to COVID-19 compared to December 31, 2019, where we had a working capital deficit due to upcoming debt maturities. As past years indicate, it is not unusual for us to have a working capital deficit; however, we believe it is not an indication of a lack of liquidity. We also maintain adequate resources, including our credit facility and, when necessary, access the capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements.

We generated $8.5 billion of cash from operating activities in 2020. Based on the strength of our cash position, we completed a $1.0 billion debt exchange; redeemed the $500 million principal outstanding of 4.0% notes due February 1, 2021, on November 1, 2020; repaid the $300 million outstanding bilateral revolving credit lines that we assumed earlier in the year; repaid the $400 million outstanding on the Receivables Facility; and reduced our commercial paper outstanding from $200 million to $75 million. We have been, and we expect to continue to be, in compliance with our debt covenants. Our bad debt provision was adjusted to reflect deteriorations of customers’ creditworthiness. We maintained the dividend during 2020 paying out $2.6 billion and repurchased shares totaling $3.7 billion. In the third quarter, we completed our $2 billion accelerated share repurchase program entered into on February 18, 2020, and resumed share repurchases in the fourth quarter after suspending share repurchases in March 2020.

Our principal sources of liquidity includedinclude cash, cash equivalents, our receivables securitization facility, and our revolving credit facility, as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing

35


through the capital markets. WeOn December 31, 2020, we had $1.7$1.8 billion of cash and cash equivalents, $2.0 billion of committed credit available under our credit facility, up to $800 million undrawn on the Receivables Facility, and three bilateral revolving credit lines, which mature in May 2021, with no borrowings outstanding asup to $600 million of available credit. As of December 31, 2017.2020, none of the revolving credit facility, Receivables Facility, or bilateral revolving credit lines was drawn. We did not makedraw on our revolving credit facility at any borrowings under this facilitytime during 2017. The value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the $650 million capacity receivables securitization facility was $500 million as of December 31, 2017.2020. Our access to thisthe receivables securitization facility may be reduced or restricted if our bond ratings fall to certain levels below investment grade. If our bond rating were to deteriorate, it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity. Access to commercial paper as well as other capital market financingsfinancing is dependent on market conditions. Deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to access capital markets as a source of liquidity. Access to liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability. We expect that we will continue to have access to liquidity through any or all of the following sources or activities: (i) increasing the size or utilization of our receivables securitization, (ii) issuing commercial paper, (iii) entering into bank loans, outside of our revolving credit facility, or (iv) issuing bonds or other debt securities to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets. The Company’s $1.7$2.0 billion revolving credit facility is intended to support the issuance of commercial paper by UPC and also serves as an emergencyadditional source of liquidity.liquidity to fund short term needs. The Company currently does not intend to make any borrowings under this facility.

At December 31, 2017,  we hadLIBOR Transition – Each of our $2.0 billion revolving credit facility, three bilateral revolving credit lines, two term loans, and Receivables Securitization Facility currently use LIBOR as the benchmark for its floating interest rates. Authorities that regulate LIBOR have announced plans to phase out LIBOR so that it will, at some point, cease to exist as a working capital surplus. At December 31, 2016, we hadbenchmark for floating interest rates. To address the phase out of LIBOR, the agreements for substantially all of these facilities include a working capital deficit.  The decrease at 2016 year-end was primarily duemechanism to a decrease in other current assets related to a tax receivable for the late extension of bonus depreciation at December 31, 2015, alongreplace LIBOR with an increase at December 31, 2016,alternative rate or benchmark under specified circumstances through an amendment to the agreements. As part of this process, we will need to renegotiate our agreements to reference that alternative rate or benchmark, and may need to modify our existing benchmark replacement language, or obtain replacement facilities, and the use of an alternative rate or benchmark may negatively impact the terms of our facilities, including in accounts payablethe form of an adverse effect on interest rates and upcoming debt maturities. We maintain adequate resources,higher borrowing costs and when necessary, have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements, in addition to sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities.interest expense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Cash provided by operating activities

$

7,230 

$

7,525 

$

7,344 

$

8,540 

$

8,609 

$

8,686 

Cash used in investing activities

 

(3,086)

 

(3,393)

 

(4,476)

(2,676)

(3,435)

(3,411)

Cash used in financing activities

 

(4,146)

 

(4,246)

 

(3,063)

(4,902)

(5,646)

(5,222)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

(2)

$

(114)

$

(195)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

$

962 

$

(472)

$

53 

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased in 20172020 compared to 20162019 due primarily to the timinglower net income, partially offset by a deferral of employment tax payments allowed by a provision in 2016 related to bonus depreciation on capital spending.  The decrease was mostly offset by higher income in 2017 compared to 2016.the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).

Cash Flow Conversion – Cash flow conversion is defined as cash provided by operating activities increasedless cash used in 2016 compared to 2015.  The timing of tax payments primarily related to bonus depreciation and changes in working capital more than offset lower net income.

The Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act extended 100% bonus depreciation effective September 27, 2017 through 2022, and phases out bonus deprecation by 2027. 

Investing Activities

Lower capital investments as a ratio of net income.

Cash flow conversion rate is not considered a financial measure under GAAP by SEC Regulation G and short-term investment purchases decreasedItem 10 of SEC Regulation S-K and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We believe cash flow conversion rate is important to management and investors in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financing. Cash flow conversion rate should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, cash provided by operating activities.

36


The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities (GAAP measure) to cash flow conversion rate (non-GAAP measure):

Millions,

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

2020

2019

2018

Cash provided by operating activities

$

8,540 

$

8,609 

$

8,686 

Cash used in capital investments

(2,927)

(3,453)

(3,437)

Total (a)

5,613 

5,156 

5,249 

Net income (b)

5,349 

5,919 

5,966 

Cash flow conversion rate (a/b)

105 

%

87 

%

88 

%

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities in 20172020 decreased compared to 2016.2019 primarily driven by reduced capital investment in locomotives and freight cars and increased real estate sales.

Lower capital investments, partially offset by short-term investment purchases, decreased cash used in investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015.

33


The following tables detail cash capital investments and track statistics for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Ties

$

507 

$

427 

$

444 

Rail and other track material

$

619 

$

628 

$

734 

471 

561 

608 

Ties

 

480 

 

494 

 

455 

Ballast

 

231 

 

235 

 

233 

225 

271 

216 

Other [a]

 

503 

 

480 

 

438 

584 

694 

576 

Total road infrastructure replacements

 

1,833 

 

1,837 

 

1,860 

1,787 

1,953 

1,844 

Line expansion and other capacity projects

 

124 

 

153 

 

457 

332 

357 

286 

Commercial facilities

 

189 

 

152 

 

227 

171 

183 

234 

Total capacity and commercial facilities

 

313 

 

305 

 

684 

503 

540 

520 

Locomotives and freight cars [b]

 

607 

 

854 

 

1,436 

269 

610 

716 

Positive train control

 

336 

 

371 

 

381 

79 

95 

158 

Technology and other

 

149 

 

138 

 

289 

289 

255 

199 

Total cash capital investments

$

3,238 

$

3,505 

$

4,650 

$

2,927 

$

3,453 

$

3,437 

[a]Other includes bridges and tunnels, signals, other road assets, and road work equipment.

[b]Locomotives and freight cars include early lease buyouts of $38 million in 2020, $290 million in 2019, and $290 million in 2018.

[a]

Other includes bridges and tunnels, signals, other road assets, and road work equipment.

[b]

Locomotives and freight cars include early lease buyouts of $173 million in 2017, $90 million in 2016, and $327 million in 2015.

2020

2019

2018

Track miles of rail replaced

468 

534 

700 

Track miles of rail capacity expansion

83 

55 

39 

New ties installed (thousands)

4,671 

3,475 

4,285 

Miles of track surfaced

10,414 

7,741 

9,466 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



2017 2016 2015 

Track miles of rail replaced

 

731 

 

791 

 

767 

Track miles of rail capacity expansion

 

11 

 

52 

 

103 

New ties installed (thousands)

 

4,026 

 

4,482 

 

4,178 

Miles of track surfaced

 

11,071 

 

11,764 

 

10,076 

Capital Plan In 2018,2021, we expect our capital plan to be approximately $3.3$2.9 billion, whichessentially flat with 2020. While implementation of our new transportation plan has generated capacity, we will continue to harden our infrastructure, replace older assets, and improve the safety and resiliency of the network. In addition, the plan includes investments intended to support growth and improve productivity and operational efficiency. The capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or the regulatory environmentif new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments. While asset replacements will fluctuate as part of our renewal strategy, we expect to use around 70% of our capital investments to renew and improve existing capital assets. We will continue to balance investment in our network infrastructure and terminal capacity as appropriate, including initial construction work on a new classification yard in our Southern Region. Significant investments in technology improvements are planned, including PTC. We also will continue commercial investments in rail facilities and equipment, including approximately 60 new locomotives, intermodal containers and chassis, and freight cars.

We expect to fund our 2018 cash capital plan by using some or all of the following: cash generated from operations, proceeds from the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, and cash on hand. Our annual capital plan is a critical component of our long-term strategic plan. We expect our plan will enhance the long-term value of the Company for our shareholders by providing sufficient resources to (i) replace and improve our existing track infrastructure to provide safe and fluid operations, (ii) increase network efficiency by adding or improving facilities and track, and (iii) make investments that meet customer demand and take advantage of opportunities for long-term growth.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities decreased in 20172020 compared to 2016. An increase2019 driven by lower share repurchases, which were paused in March of $908 million2020 due to the uncertainty of COVID-19 and resumed in common shares purchased and an increasethe fourth quarter of $103 million2020, with the exception of the final settlement in dividends paidJuly 2020 of our $2 billion accelerated share repurchase program entered into on February 18, 2020. This decrease was more thanpartially offset by an increase of $752 million in debt issued, a decrease of $173 million in debt repaid, and a decrease of $191 million in debt exchange costs.repaid.

Cash used in financing activities increased in 2016 compared to 2015. An increase of $457 million in debt repaid and a decrease of $1,345 million in debt issued more than offset a decrease of $465 million in dividends paid. The decrease in dividends paid was a result of adjusting the dividend payable dates in 2015 to align with the timing of the quarterly dividend declaration and payment dates within the same quarter. Aligning the quarterly dividend declaration and payment resulted in two payments in the first quarter of 2015: the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $438 million, which was paid on January 2, 2015, as well as the first quarter 2015 dividend of $484 million, which was paid on March 30, 2015. The second quarter 2015

34


dividend of $479 million was paid on June 30, 2015, the third quarter 2015 dividend of $476 million was paid on September 30, 2015, and the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $467 million was paid on December 31, 2015.

See Note 1514 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of all our outstanding financing arrangements and significant new borrowings.

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges37


For each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 10.3, 9.6, and 11.6, respectively. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis. Earnings represent income from continuing operations, less equity earnings net of distributions, plus fixed charges and income taxes. Fixed charges represent interest charges, amortization of debt discount, and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges.  (See Exhibit 12 to this report for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.)

Common Shareholders’ Equity

Dividend Restrictions – Our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant (discussed in the Credit Facilities section above) that, under certain circumstances, restricts the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders. The amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $16.4 billion and $12.4 billion at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Share Repurchase ProgramPrograms

Effective JanuaryApril 1, 2017,2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120150 million shares of our common stock by DecemberMarch 31, 2020,2022, replacing our previous repurchase program. These repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions. Our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we repurchased a total of $23.2$40.9 billion of our common stock since the commencement of our repurchase programs in 2007. The table below represents shares repurchased in 2017 under this repurchase programs during 2020 and 2019:

Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid [a]

2020

2019

2020

2019

First quarter [b]

14,305,793 

18,149,450 

$

178.66 

$

165.79 

Second quarter

-

3,732,974 

-

171.24 

Third quarter [c]

4,045,575 

9,529,733 

98.87 

163.30 

Fourth quarter

3,780,743 

3,582,212 

198.07 

167.32 

Total

22,132,111 

34,994,369 

$

167.39 

$

165.85 

Remaining number of shares that may be repurchased under current authority

111,022,970 

[a]In the period of the final settlement, the average price paid under the accelerated share repurchase programs is calculated based on the total program value less the value assigned to the initial delivery of shares. The average price of the completed 2020 and 2019 accelerated share repurchase programs was $155.86 and $167.01, respectively.

[b]Includes 8,786,380 and 11,795,930 shares repurchased in 2016February 2020 and 2019, respectively, under our previous purchase program.accelerated share repurchase programs.

[c]Includes an incremental 4,045,575 and 3,172,900 shares received upon final settlement in July 2020 and August 2019, respectively, under accelerated share repurchase programs.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid



2017 2016 

 

2017 

 

2016 

First quarter

7,531,300 9,315,807 

$

106.55 

$

76.49 

Second quarter

7,788,283 7,026,100 

 

109.10 

 

85.66 

Third quarter

11,801,755 9,088,613 

 

106.69 

 

93.63 

Fourth quarter

9,231,510 9,624,667 

 

119.37 

 

97.60 

Total

36,352,848 35,055,187 

$

110.40 

$

88.57 

Management's assessments of market conditions and other pertinent factsfactors guide the timing and volume of all repurchases. We expect to fund any share repurchases under this program through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, debt issuances, and cash on hand. Repurchased sharesOpen market repurchases are recorded in treasury stock at cost, which includes any applicable commissions and fees.

From January 1, 2018,2021, through February 8, 2018,4, 2021, we repurchased 2.62.1 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $349$442 million.

Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs – The Company has established accelerated share repurchase programs (ASRs) with financial institutions to repurchase shares of our common stock. These ASRs have been structured so that at the time of commencement, we pay a specified amount to the financial institutions and receive an initial delivery of shares. Additional shares may be received at the time of settlement. The final number of shares to be received is based on the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock during the ASR term, less a discount and subject to potential adjustments pursuant to the terms of such ASR.

On February 19, 2020, the Company received 8,786,380 shares of its common stock repurchased under ASRs for an aggregate of $2.0 billion. Upon settlement of these ASRs in the third quarter of 2020, we received 4,045,575 additional shares.

On February 26, 2019, the Company received 11,795,930 shares of its common stock repurchased under ASRs for an aggregate of $2.5 billion. Upon settlement of these ASRs in the third quarter of 2019, we received 3,172,900 additional shares.

ASRs are accounted for as equity transactions, and at the time of receipt, shares are included in treasury stock at fair market value as of the corresponding initiation or settlement date. The Company reflects shares received as a repurchase of common stock in the weighted average common shares outstanding calculation for basic and diluted earnings per share.

38


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

As described in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and as referenced in the tables below, we have contractual obligations and commercial commitments that may affect our financial condition. Based on our assessment of the underlying provisions and circumstances of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments, including material sources of off-balance sheet and structured finance arrangements, other than the risks that we and other similarly situated companies face with respect to the condition of the capital markets (as described in Item 1A of Part II of this report), there is no known trend, demand, commitment, event, or uncertainty that is reasonably likely to occur that would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. In addition, our commercial obligations, financings, and commitments are customary transactions that are similar to those of other comparable corporations, particularly within the transportation industry.

35


The following tables identify material obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2017:2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by December 31,

Payments Due by December 31,

Contractual Obligations

Contractual Obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After

 

 

Contractual Obligations

After

Millions

Millions

Total

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 

Other

Millions

Total

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Other

Debt [a]

Debt [a]

$

28,965 

$

1,325 

$

1,614 

$

1,473 

$

1,098 

$

1,337 

$

22,118 

$

 -

Debt [a]

$

48,525 

$

1,975 

$

2,280 

$

2,246 

$

2,265 

$

2,245 

$

37,514 

$

-

Operating leases [b]

 

2,649 

 

398 

 

359 

 

297 

 

259 

 

221 

 

1,115 

 

 -

Capital lease obligations [c]

 

1,079 

 

173 

 

156 

 

164 

 

168 

 

147 

 

271 

 

 -

Purchase obligations [d]

 

2,789 

 

1,573 

 

459 

 

319 

 

247 

 

48 

 

111 

 

32 

Purchase obligations [b]

Purchase obligations [b]

2,790 

1,174 

547 

246 

204 

162 

457 

-

Operating leases [c]

Operating leases [c]

1,830 

325 

273 

229 

220 

216 

567 

-

Finance lease obligations [d]

Finance lease obligations [d]

517 

135 

111 

81 

68 

45 

77 

-

Other post retirement benefits [e]

Other post retirement benefits [e]

 

479 

 

50 

 

49 

 

49 

 

48 

 

48 

 

235 

 

 -

Other post retirement benefits [e]

410 

49 

45 

44 

39 

39 

194 

-

Income tax contingencies [f]

Income tax contingencies [f]

 

179 

 

56 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

123 

Income tax contingencies [f]

74 

-

-

-

-

-

73 

Total contractual obligations

Total contractual obligations

$

36,140 

$

3,575 

$

2,637 

$

2,302 

$

1,820 

$

1,801 

$

23,850 

$

155 

Total contractual obligations

$

54,146 

$

3,659 

$

3,256 

$

2,846 

$

2,796 

$

2,707 

$

38,809 

$

73 

[a]Excludes finance lease obligations of $449 million as well as unamortized discount and deferred issuance costs of ($1,538) million. Includes an interest component of $20,707 million.

[b]Purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts; purchase commitments for fuel purchases, ties, ballast, and rail; and agreements to purchase other goods and services.

[c]Includes leases for locomotives, freight cars, other equipment, and real estate.

[d]Represents total obligations, including interest component of $68 million.

[e]Includes estimated other post retirement, medical, and life insurance payments, and payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years.

[f]Future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liabilities and assets for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, as of December 31, 2020. For amounts where the year of settlement is uncertain, they are reflected in the Other column.

[a]

Excludes capital lease obligations of $892 million, as well as unamortized discount and deferred issuance costs of $(887) million. Includes an interest component of $12,026 million.

[b]

Includes leases for locomotives, freight cars, other equipment, and real estate.

[c]

Represents total obligations, including interest component of $187 million.

[d]

Purchase obligations include locomotive maintenance contracts; purchase commitments for fuel purchases, locomotives, ties, ballast, and rail; and agreements to purchase other goods and services.  For amounts where we cannot reasonably estimate the year of settlement, they are reflected in the Other column.

[e]

Includes estimated other post retirement, medical, and life insurance payments, payments made under the unfunded pension plan for the next ten years.

[f]

Future cash flows for income tax contingencies reflect the recorded liabilities and assets for unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, as of December 31, 2017.  For amounts where the year of settlement is uncertain, they are reflected in the Other column.

Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period

Other Commercial Commitments

After

Millions

Total

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2025

Credit facilities [a]

$

2,000 

$

-

$

-

$

2,000 

$

$

-

$

-

Receivables securitization facility [b]

800 

-

800 

-

-

-

-

Bilateral revolving credit lines [c]

600 

600 

-

-

-

-

-

Standby letters of credit [d]

19 

16 

-

-

-

-

Guarantees [e]

10 

-

-

-

-

Total commercial commitments

$

3,429 

$

621 

$

808 

$

2,000 

$

-

$

-

$

-



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period

Other Commercial Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

After

Millions

Total

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2022 

Credit facilities [a]

$

1,700 

$

 -

$

1,700 

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

Receivables securitization facility [b]

 

650 

 

 -

 

650 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Guarantees [c]

 

33 

 

11 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

Standby letters of credit [d]

 

19 

 

19 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Total commercial commitments

$

2,402 

$

30 

$

2,357 

$

$

$

$

 -

[a]

None of the credit facility was used as of December 31, 2017.

[b]

$500 million of the receivables securitization facility was utilized as of December 31, 2017, which is accounted for as debt. The full program matures in July 2019.

[c]

Includes guaranteed obligations related to our affiliated operations.

[d]

None of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of December 31, 2017.

[a]None of the credit facility was used as of December 31, 2020.

[b]None of the receivables securitization facility was utilized as of December 31, 2020. The full program matures in July 2022.

[c]None of the bilateral revolving credit lines were utilized as of December 31, 2020. The programs mature in May 2021.

[d]None of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of December 31, 2020.

[e]Includes guaranteed obligations related to our affiliated operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Guarantees – At December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, we were contingently liable for $33$10 million and $43$15 million, respectively, in guarantees. The fair value of these obligations as of both December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, was $0. We entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business, and they include guaranteed obligations related to our affiliated operations. The final guarantee expires in 2022. We are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees. We do not expect

39


that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

OTHER MATTERS

Labor Agreements Approximately 85%83% of our 41,992 full-time-equivalentfull-time employees are represented by 1413 major rail unions. On January 1, 2015, current laborPursuant to the Railway Labor Act (RLA), our collective bargaining agreements becameare subject to modification and we began the current round of negotiations with the unions.every five years. Existing agreements remain in effect until new agreements are ratified or until the Railway Labor Act’s (RLA)RLA procedures (whichare exhausted. The RLA procedures include mediation, potential arbitration, cooling-off periods, and the possibility of Presidential Emergency Boards and Congressional intervention) are exhausted. Through industry and localintervention. The current round of negotiations UPRR reached tentative new agreements with 12 of our 14 major rail unions. Nine unions (representing nearly 70% of our agreement work force) have ratified those agreements by significant margins. The tentative agreement failed ratification with two unions in early February 2018 (representing about 10% of our agreement work force)

36


returning any further discussions with thembegan on January 1, 2020, related to the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board.  Another small union (less than 1%) is still out for ratification. UPRR and the industry currently continue in active mediation with the remaining coalition of two unions (representing about 20% of our agreement work force).  Under the Railway Labor Act, the National Mediation Board controls timing and location of mediation conferences and when to terminate mediation, moving the parties to the next stages of the RLA process.years 2020-2024. Contract negotiations historically continue for an extended period of time, and we rarely experience work stoppages whileduring negotiations are pending.rare (see “Strikes or Work Stoppages Could Adversely Affect Our Operations” in the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report).

Inflation – Long periods of inflation significantly increase asset replacement costs for capital-intensive companies. As a result, assuming that we replace all operating assets at current price levels, depreciation charges (on an inflation-adjusted basis) would be substantially greater than historically reported amounts.

Sensitivity Analyses – The sensitivity analyses that follow illustrate the economic effect that hypothetical changes in interest rates could have on our results of operations and financial condition. These hypothetical changes do not consider other factors that could impact actual results.

At December 31, 2017,2020, we had variable-rate debt representing approximately 4.4%1.2% of our total debt. If variable interest rates average one percentage point higher in 20182021 than our December 31, 20172020, variable rate, which was approximately 2.2%1.3%, our interest expense would increase by approximately $7.5$3.3 million. This amount was determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rate on the balances of our variable-rate debt at December 31, 2017.2020.

Market risk for fixed-rate debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value resulting from a hypothetical one percentage point decrease in interest rates as of December 31, 2017,2020, and amounts to an increase of approximately $2.2$4.7 billion to the fair value of our debt at December 31, 2017.2020. We estimated the fair values of our fixed-rate debt by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on quoted market prices and current borrowing rates.

Accounting Pronouncements – See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Asserted and Unasserted Claims – Various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries. We cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. To the extent possible, we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated. We do not expect that any known lawsuits, claims, environmental costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters.

Indemnities – Our maximum potential exposure under indemnification arrangements, including certain tax indemnifications, can range from a specified dollar amount to an unlimited amount, depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements. Due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved, we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements. We do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions.

Climate Change – Although climate change could have an adverse impact on our operations and financial performance in the future (see Risk Factors under Item 1A of this report), we are currently unable to predict the manner or severity of such impact. However, we continue to take steps and explore opportunities to reduce the impact of our operations on the environment, including investments in new technologies, using training programs and technology to reduce fuel consumption, and changing our operations to increase fuel efficiency.

40


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires estimation and judgment that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The following critical accounting policies are a subset of our significant accounting policies described in Note 2 to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8. These critical accounting

37


policies affect significant areas of our financial statements and involve judgment and estimates. If these estimates differ significantly from actual results, the impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements may be material.

Personal Injury – The cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability, including unasserted claims. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) governs compensation for work-related accidents. Under FELA, damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements. We offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work.

Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 95%94% of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5%6% is related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2017.2020. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $285$270 million to $310$295 million. We record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other. Estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation.

Our personal injury liability activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Beginning balance

$

290 

$

318 

$

335 

$

265 

$

271 

$

285 

Current year accruals

 

77 

 

75 

 

89 

72 

78 

74 

Changes in estimates for prior years

 

(7)

 

(29)

 

(3)

(3)

(11)

(16)

Payments

 

(75)

 

(74)

 

(103)

(64)

(73)

(72)

Ending balance at December 31

$

285 

$

290 

$

318 

$

270 

$

265 

$

271 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

66 

$

62 

$

63 

$

60 

$

63 

$

72 

Our personal injury claims activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Open claims, beginning balance

2,157 2,404 2,618 

1,985 

2,025 

2,090 

New claims

3,024 2,453 2,573 

2,577 

3,025 

3,188 

Settled or dismissed claims

(3,091)(2,700)(2,787)

(2,665)

(3,065)

(3,253)

Open claims, ending balance at December 31

2,090 2,157 2,404 

1,897 

1,985 

2,025 

In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2017, we also reassessedWe reassess our estimated insurance recoveries. Werecoveries annually and have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016. 2019. Any changes to recorded insurance recoveries are included in the above table in the Changes in estimates for prior years category.

Asbestos – We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits in which current and former employees and other parties allege exposure to asbestos. We assess our potential liability using a statistical analysis of resolution costs for asbestos-related claims.  This liability is updated annually and excludes future defense and processing costs. The liability for resolving both asserted and unasserted claims was based on the following assumptions:

·

The ratio of future claims by alleged disease would be consistent with historical averages adjusted for inflation.

·

The number of claims filed against us will decline each year.

·

The average settlement values for asserted and unasserted claims will be equivalent to historical averages.

·

The percentage of claims dismissed in the future will be equivalent to historical averages.

Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 16% of the recorded liability related to asserted claims and approximately 84% related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2017.  Because of the uncertainty

38


surrounding the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $99 million to $105 million.  We record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other.

Our asbestos-related liability activity was as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Beginning balance

$

111 

$

120 

$

126 

Accruals/(Credits)

 

(1)

 

12 

 

 -

Payments

 

(11)

 

(21)

 

(6)

Ending balance at December 31

$

99 

$

111 

$

120 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

$

$

Our asbestos-related claims activity was as follows:



 

 

 



 

 

 



2017 2016 2015 

Open claims, beginning balance

943 1,089 1,065 

New claims

60 164 193 

Settled or dismissed claims

(214)(310)(169)

Open claims, ending balance at December 31

789 943 1,089 

In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2017, we also reassessed our estimated insurance recoveries. We have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2017, and 2016.  The amounts recorded for asbestos-related liabilities and related insurance recoveries were based on currently known facts. However, future events, such as the number of new claims filed each year, average settlement costs, and insurance coverage issues, could cause the actual costs and insurance recoveries to be higher or lower than the projected amounts. Estimates also may vary in the future if strategies, activities, and outcomes of asbestos litigation materially change; federal and state laws governing asbestos litigation increase or decrease the probability or amount of compensation of claimants; and there are material changes with respect to payments made to claimants by other defendants.

Environmental Costs – We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. We have identified 315373 sites at whichwhere we are or may be liable for remediation costs associated with alleged contamination or for violations of environmental requirements. This includes 3329 sites that are the subject of actions taken by the U.S. government, 2118 of which are currently on the Superfund National Priorities List. Certain federal legislation imposes joint and several liability for the remediation of identified sites; consequently, our ultimate environmental liability may include costs relating to activities of other parties, in addition to costs relating to our own activities at each site.

41


When we identify an environmental issue with respect to property owned, leased, or otherwise used in our business, we perform, with assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on the property. We expense the cost of the assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where our obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Our environmental liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments.

Our environmental liability activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Beginning balance

$

212 

$

190 

$

182 

$

227 

$

223 

$

196 

Accruals

 

45 

 

84 

 

61 

76 

67 

84 

Payments

 

(61)

 

(62)

 

(53)

(70)

(63)

(57)

Ending balance at December 31

$

196 

$

212 

$

190 

$

233 

$

227 

$

223 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

57 

$

55 

$

52 

$

65 

$

62 

$

59 

39


Our environmental site activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Open sites, beginning balance

292 290 270 

360 

334 

315 

New sites

77 85 66 

96 

114 

91 

Closed sites

(54)(83)(46)

(83)

(88)

(72)

Open sites, ending balance at December 31

315 292 290 

373 

360 

334 

The environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites as well as ongoing monitoring costs, but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties. Cost estimates are based on information available for each site, financial viability of other potentially responsible parties, and existing technology, laws, and regulations. The ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties, site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs. Estimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal, state, and local laws governing environmental remediation. Current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

Property and Depreciation – Our railroad operations are highly capital intensive, and our large base of homogeneous, network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis. Each year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enableenables us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers. Assets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria. Properties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment, and yard and switching tracks, and electronic yards)tracks) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics, use, and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes, and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology, asset strategies, or other factors.

We determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation studies. We perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track assets (i.e., rail and other track material, ties, and ballast) and other road property. Our depreciation studies take into account the following factors:

Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;

Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets;

Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and

Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.

·

Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;

·

Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets;

42


·

Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and

·

Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.

For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track. It has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage (i.e., the amount of weight carried over the rail). The service lives also vary based on rail weight, rail condition (e.g., new or secondhand), and rail type (e.g., straight or curve). Our depreciation studies for rail in high-density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives. For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail (i.e., the weight of loaded and empty freight cars, locomotives, and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile. Rail in high-density traffic corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material. Based on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2017,2020, the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 1924 years to approximately 4148 years. For all other depreciable assets, we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives of our assets as determined from the analysis of our depreciation studies. Changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively.

40


Estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property may vary over time due to changes in physical use, technology, asset strategies, and other factors that will have an impact on the retirement profiles of our assets. We are not aware of any specific factors that are reasonably likely to significantly change the estimated service lives of our assets. Actual use and retirement of our assets may vary from our current estimates, which would impact the amount of depreciation expense recognized in future periods.

Changes in estimated useful lives of our assets due to the results of our depreciation studies could significantly impact future periods’ depreciation expense and have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. If the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year, annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $65$68 million. If the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were decreased by one year, annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $70$72 million. Our recent2020 depreciation studies have resulted in lower depreciation rates for some asset classes. TheseThese lower rates will partially offset the impact of a projected higher depreciable asset base, resulting in an increase ina flat year-over-year total depreciation expense by approximately 5% in 20182021 versus 2017.2020.

Under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. The historical cost of certain track assets is estimated by multiplying the current replacement cost of track assets by a historical index factor derived from (i) inflation indices published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. The indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. Because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. In addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. Any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets.

For retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) it is unusual, (ii) it is material in amount, and (iii) it varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. During the last three fiscal years, no gains or losses were recognized due to the retirement of depreciable railroad properties. A gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations.

We review construction in progress assets that have not yet been placed into service, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or assets may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of construction in progress assets when grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value.

Income Taxes – We account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have

43


been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. These expected future tax consequences are measured based on current tax law; the effects of future tax legislation are not anticipated. Future tax legislation, such as a change in the corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. For example, a permanent 1% increase in future income tax rates would increase our deferred tax liability by approximately $430$521 million. Similarly, a permanent 1% decrease in future income tax rates would decrease our deferred tax liability by approximately $430$521 million.

When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset. In 20182020 and 2017,2019, there were no valuation allowances.

We recognize tax benefits that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits – We use an actuarial analysis to measure the liabilities and expenses associated with providing pension and medical and life insurance benefits (OPEB) to eligible employees. In order to use actuarial methods to value the liabilities and expenses, we must make several assumptions. The critical assumptions used to measure pension obligations and expenses are the discount

41


rates and expected rate of return on pension assets. For OPEB, the critical assumptions are the discount rates and health care cost trend rate.

We evaluate our critical assumptions at least annually, and selected assumptions are based on the following factors:

·

Beginning in 2016, we measure the service cost and interest cost components of our net periodic benefit cost by using individual spot rates matched with separate cash flows for each future year.  Discount rates are based on a Mercer yield curve of high quality corporate bonds (rated AA by a recognized rating agency).

·

Expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into consideration current and expected market conditions.

·

Health care cost trend rate is based on our historical rates of inflation and expected market conditions.

We measure the service cost and interest cost components of our net periodic benefit cost by using individual spot rates matched with separate cash flows for each future year. Discount rates are based on a Mercer yield curve of high quality corporate bonds (rated AA by a recognized rating agency).

Expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into consideration current and expected market conditions.

Health care cost trend rate is based on our historical rates of inflation and expected market conditions.

The following tables present the key assumptions used to measure net periodic pension and OPEB cost/(benefit) for 20182021 and the estimated impact on 20182021 net periodic pension and OPEB cost/(benefit) relative to a change in those assumptions:

 

 

Assumptions

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Discount rate for benefit obligations

3.62% 3.53% 

2.42%

2.22%

Discount rate for interest on benefit obligations

3.27% 3.12% 

1.91%

1.57%

Discount rate for service cost

3.77% 3.72% 

2.62%

2.36%

Discount rate for interest on service cost

3.72% 3.65% 

2.54%

2.23%

Expected return on plan assets

7.00% 

N/A

6.25%

N/A

Compensation increase

4.13% 

N/A

4.40%

N/A

Health care cost trend rate:

 

Pre-65 current

N/A

6.31% 

N/A

5.42%

Pre-65 level in 2038

N/A

4.50% 

N/A

4.50%

Sensitivities

Increase in Expense

Millions

Pension

OPEB

0.25% decrease in discount rates

$

12 

$

 -

0.25% increase in compensation scale

$

N/A

0.25% decrease in expected return on plan assets

$

N/A

1% increase in health care cost trend rate

N/A

$

Sensitivities

Increase in Expense

Millions

Pension

OPEB

0.25% decrease in discount rates

$

13 

$

(5)

0.25% increase in compensation scale

$

N/A

0.25% decrease in expected return on plan assets

$

10 

N/A

44


The following table presents the net periodic pension and OPEB cost for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Est.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Est.

Millions

2018 2017 2016 2015 

2021

2020

2019

2018

Net periodic pension cost

$

69 

$

115 

$

43 

$

120 

$

98 

$

50 

$

34 

$

71 

Net periodic OPEB cost

 

22 

 

22 

 

13 

 

19 

(3)

(1)

10 

23 

CAUTIONARY INFORMATION

Certain statements in this report, and statements in other reports or information filed or to be filed with the SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us), are, or will be, forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements and information include, without limitation, (A) statements in the Chairman’s letter preceding Part I; statements regarding planned capital expenditures under the caption “2018“2021 Capital Plan” in Item 2 of Part I; statements regarding dividends in Item 5 of Part II; and statements and information set forth under the captions “2018“2021 Outlook”; “Liquidity and Capital Resources”; in Item 7 of Part II regarding our capital plan, “Share Repurchase Programs”, “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial Commitments”, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits”, and “Other Matters” in this Item 7 of Part II,II. Forward-looking statements and (B)information also include any other statements or information in this report (including information incorporated herein by reference) regarding: potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations, financial results, liquidity, and financial position, and on the world economy (including our customers and supply chains), including as a result of decreased volume and carloadings; closing of customer manufacturing, distribution, or production facilities; expectations as to financial performance,operational or service improvements; expectations regarding the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations, service, infrastructure improvements, and transportation plan modifications; expectations as to cost savings, revenue growth, and cost savings;earnings; the time by which goals, targets, or objectives will be achieved; projections, predictions, expectations, estimates, or forecasts as to our business, financial, and operational results, future economic performance, and general economic conditions; expectations as to operational or service performance or improvements; expectations as to the effectiveness of steps taken or to be taken to improve operations and/or service, including capital

42


expenditures for infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisitions, any strategic business acquisitions, and modifications to our transportation plans, including implementation ofleveraging PTC; expectations as to existing or proposed new products and services; expectations as to the impact of any new regulatory activities or legislation on our operations or financial results; estimates of costs relating to environmental remediation and restoration; estimates and expectations regarding tax matters; expectations that claims, litigation, environmental costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, labor negotiations or agreements, or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity and any other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “projects” and similar words, phrases, or expressions.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times that, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements and information are subject to risks and uncertainties, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and responses by governments, businesses, and individuals, that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements and information. Forward-looking statements and information reflect the good faith consideration by management of currently available information, and may be based on underlying assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, such information and assumptions (and, therefore, such forward-looking statements and information) are or may be subject to variables or unknown or unforeseeable events or circumstances over which management has little or no influence or control.control, and many of these risks and uncertainties are currently amplified by and may continue to be amplified by, or in the future may be amplified by, the COVID-19 pandemic. The Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements or information. To the extent circumstances require or we deem it otherwise necessary, we will update or amend these risk factors in a Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, or subsequent Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements are qualified by, and should be read in conjunction with, these Risk Factors.

45


Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking information to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Information concerning market risk sensitive instruments is set forth under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Other Matters, Item 7.

****************************************

43


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

45 

47

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018

46 

49

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018

46 

49

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

At December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

47 

50

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018

48 

51

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018

49 

52

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

50 

53


4446


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation

Omaha, Nebraska

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the "Corporation") as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements ofincome, comprehensive income, changes in common shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Table of Contents at Part IV, Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 9, 2018,5, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2019, the Corporation adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.


47


Capitalization of Properties — Refer to Notes 2 and 11 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Corporation’s operations are highly capital intensive and their large network of assets turns over on a continuous basis. Each year, the Corporation develops a capital program for both the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of new assets. In determining whether costs should be capitalized, the Corporation exercises significant judgment in determining whether expenditures meet the applicable minimum units of property criteria and extend the useful life, improve the safety of operations, or improve the operating efficiency of existing assets. The Corporation capitalizes all costs of capital projects necessary to make assets ready for their intended use and because a portion of the Corporation’s assets are self-constructed, management also exercises significant judgment in determining the amount of material, labor, work equipment, and indirect costs that qualify for capitalization. Net properties were $54,161 million as of December 31, 2020 and, during 2020, the Corporation’s capital investments were $2.9 billion.

We identified the capitalization of property as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgment exercised by management in determining whether costs meet the criteria for capitalization. This, in turn, required a high degree of auditor judgment when performing audit procedures to evaluate whether the criteria to capitalize costs were met and to evaluate sufficiency of audit evidence to support management’s conclusions.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our procedures related to capitalization of property included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over the Corporation’s determination of whether costs related to the Corporation’s capital program should be capitalized or expensed.

We evaluated the Corporation’s capitalization policy in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

For a selection of capital projects, we performed the following:

Obtained the Corporation’s evaluation of each project and determined whether the amount of costs to be capitalized met the criteria for capitalization as outlined within the Corporation’s policy by unit of property.

Obtained supporting documentation that the project met the applicable minimum units of property criteria and was approved, and evaluated whether the project extended the useful life of an existing asset, improved the safety of operations, or improved the operating efficiency of existing assets.

For a selection of capitalized costs during the year, we performed the following:

Evaluated whether the individual cost selected met the criteria for capitalization.

Evaluated whether the selection was accurately recorded at the appropriate amount based on the evidence obtained.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Omaha, Nebraska

February 9, 20185, 2021

We have served as the Corporation’s auditor since 1967.

4548


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts,
for the Years Ended December 31,

2017 2016 2015 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts,
for the Years Ended December 31,

2020

2019

2018

Operating revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Freight revenues

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

$

20,397 

$

18,251 

$

20,243 

$

21,384 

Other revenues

 

1,403 

 

1,340 

 

1,416 

1,282 

1,465 

1,448 

Total operating revenues

 

21,240 

 

19,941 

 

21,813 

19,533 

21,708 

22,832 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits

 

4,984 

 

4,750 

 

5,161 

3,993 

4,533 

5,056 

Depreciation

2,210 

2,216 

2,191 

Purchased services and materials

 

2,363 

 

2,258 

 

2,421 

1,962 

2,254 

2,443 

Depreciation

 

2,105 

 

2,038 

 

2,012 

Fuel

 

1,891 

 

1,489 

 

2,013 

1,314 

2,107 

2,531 

Equipment and other rents

 

888 

 

1,137 

 

1,230 

875 

984 

1,072 

Other

 

948 

 

997 

 

924 

1,345 

1,060 

1,022 

Total operating expenses

 

13,179 

 

12,669 

 

13,761 

11,699 

13,154 

14,315 

Operating income

 

8,061 

 

7,272 

 

8,052 

7,834 

8,554 

8,517 

Other income (Note 7)

 

290 

 

192 

 

226 

Other income (Note 6)

287 

243 

94 

Interest expense

 

(719)

 

(698)

 

(622)

(1,141)

(1,050)

(870)

Income before income taxes

 

7,632 

 

6,766 

 

7,656 

6,980 

7,747 

7,741 

Income tax benefit/(expense) (Note 8)

 

3,080 

 

(2,533)

 

(2,884)

Income tax expense (Note 7)

(1,631)

(1,828)

(1,775)

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Share and Per Share (Note 9):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share and Per Share (Note 8):

Earnings per share - basic

$

13.42 

$

5.09 

$

5.51 

$

7.90 

$

8.41 

$

7.95 

Earnings per share - diluted

$

13.36 

$

5.07 

$

5.49 

$

7.88 

$

8.38 

$

7.91 

Weighted average number of shares - basic

 

798.4 

 

832.4 

 

866.2 

677.3 

703.5 

750.9 

Weighted average number of shares - diluted

 

801.7 

 

835.4 

 

869.4 

679.1 

706.1 

754.3 

Dividends declared per share

$

2.48 

$

2.255 

$

2.20 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions,
for the Years Ended December 31,

2017 2016 2015 

Millions,
for the Years Ended December 31,

Millions,
for the Years Ended December 31,

2020

2019

2018

Net income

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

Net income

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

:

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

:

Defined benefit plans

Defined benefit plans

 

103 

 

(29)

 

58 

Defined benefit plans

(231)

42 

62 

Foreign currency translation

Foreign currency translation

 

28 

 

(48)

 

(43)

Foreign currency translation

(6)

17 

(36)

Total other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

Total other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

 

131 

 

(77)

 

15 

Total other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

(237)

59 

26 

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

$

10,843 

$

4,156 

$

4,787 

Comprehensive income

$

5,112 

$

5,978 

$

5,992 

[a]

Net of deferred taxes of $(61) million, $49 million, $(8) million, and during 2017, 2016,  and 2015, respectively.

[a]Net of deferred taxes of $75 million, ($15) million, and ($22) million during 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


4649


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Share and Per Share Amounts
as of December 31,

2017 2016 

Millions, Except Share and Per Share Amounts
as of December 31,

2020 

2019

Assets

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1,275 

$

1,277 

$

1,799 

$

831 

Short-term investments (Note 14)

 

90 

 

60 

Accounts receivable, net (Note 11)

 

1,493 

 

1,258 

Short-term investments (Note 13)

60 

60 

Accounts receivable, net (Note 10)

1,505 

1,595 

Materials and supplies

 

749 

 

717 

638 

751 

Other current assets

 

399 

 

284 

212 

222 

Total current assets

 

4,006 

 

3,596 

4,214 

3,459 

Investments

 

1,809 

 

1,457 

2,164 

2,050 

Net properties (Note 12)

 

51,605 

 

50,389 

Net properties (Note 11)

54,161 

53,916 

Operating lease assets (Note 16)

1,610 

1,812 

Other assets

 

386 

 

276 

249 

436 

Total assets

$

57,806 

$

55,718 

$

62,398 

$

61,673 

Liabilities and Common Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities (Note 13)

$

3,139 

$

2,882 

Debt due within one year (Note 15)

 

800 

 

758 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities (Note 12)

$

3,104 

$

3,094 

Debt due within one year (Note 14)

1,069 

1,257 

Total current liabilities

 

3,939 

 

3,640 

4,173 

4,351 

Debt due after one year (Note 15)

 

16,144 

 

14,249 

Deferred income taxes (Note 8)

 

10,936 

 

15,996 

Debt due after one year (Note 14)

25,660 

23,943 

Operating lease liabilities (Note 16)

1,283 

1,471 

Deferred income taxes (Note 7)

12,247 

11,992 

Other long-term liabilities

 

1,931 

 

1,901 

2,077 

1,788 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 17 and 18)

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

 

Total liabilities

 

32,950 

 

35,786 

45,440 

43,545 

Common shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

Common shares, $2.50 par value, 1,400,000,000 authorized;

 

 

 

 

1,111,371,304 and 1,110,986,415 issued; 780,917,756 and 815,824,413

 

 

 

 

1,112,227,784 and 1,112,014,480 issued; 671,351,360 and 692,100,651

outstanding, respectively

 

2,778 

 

2,777 

2,781 

2,780 

Paid-in-surplus

 

4,476 

 

4,421 

4,864 

4,523 

Retained earnings

 

41,317 

 

32,587 

51,326 

48,605 

Treasury stock

 

(22,574)

 

(18,581)

(40,420)

(36,424)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 10)

 

(1,141)

 

(1,272)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 9)

(1,593)

(1,356)

Total common shareholders' equity

 

24,856 

 

19,932 

16,958 

18,128 

Total liabilities and common shareholders' equity

$

57,806 

$

55,718 

$

62,398 

$

61,673 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


4750


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, for the Years Ended December 31,

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
by operating activities:

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided
by operating activities:

Depreciation

 

2,105 

 

2,038 

 

2,012 

2,210 

2,216 

2,191 

Deferred and other income taxes

 

(5,067)

 

831 

 

765 

340 

566 

338 

Net gain on non-operating asset dispositions

 

(111)

 

(94)

 

(144)

(115)

(20)

(30)

Other operating activities, net

 

(282)

 

(228)

 

116 

490 

98 

347 

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

(235)

 

98 

 

255 

90 

160 

(262)

Materials and supplies

 

(32)

 

19 

 

(24)

113 

(9)

Other current assets

 

 

22 

 

(47)

(34)

87 

(24)

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

182 

 

232 

 

(276)

(73)

(179)

(125)

Income and other taxes

 

(51)

 

374 

 

(85)

170 

(229)

278 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

7,230 

 

7,525 

 

7,344 

8,540 

8,609 

8,686 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital investments

 

(3,238)

 

(3,505)

 

(4,650)

(2,927)

(3,453)

(3,437)

Proceeds from asset sales

 

168 

 

129 

 

251 

149 

74 

63 

Purchases of short-term investments (Note 14)

 

(120)

 

(580)

 

 -

Maturities of short-term investments (Note 14)

 

90 

 

520 

 

 -

Maturities of short-term investments (Note 13)

141 

130 

90 

Purchases of short-term investments (Note 13)

(136)

(115)

(90)

Other investing activities, net

 

14 

 

43 

 

(77)

97 

(71)

(37)

Cash used in investing activities

 

(3,086)

 

(3,393)

 

(4,476)

(2,676)

(3,435)

(3,411)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common share repurchases (Note 19)

 

(4,013)

 

(3,105)

 

(3,465)

Debt issued

 

2,735 

 

1,983 

 

3,328 

Debt issued (Note 14)

4,004 

3,986 

6,892 

Share repurchase programs (Note 18)

(3,705)

(5,804)

(8,225)

Dividends paid

 

(1,982)

 

(1,879)

 

(2,344)

(2,626)

(2,598)

(2,299)

Debt repaid

 

(840)

 

(1,013)

 

(556)

(2,053)

(817)

(1,736)

Debt exchange

 

 -

 

(191)

 

 -

(328)

(387)

-

Net issuance of commercial paper (Note 14)

(127)

(6)

194 

Other financing activities, net

 

(46)

 

(41)

 

(26)

(67)

(20)

(48)

Cash used in financing activities

 

(4,146)

 

(4,246)

 

(3,063)

(4,902)

(5,646)

(5,222)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(2)

 

(114)

 

(195)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

1,277 

 

1,391 

 

1,586 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

1,275 

$

1,277 

$

1,391 

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

962 

(472)

53 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year

856 

1,328 

1,275 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of year

$

1,818 

$

856 

$

1,328 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term loan renewals

$

250 

$

250 

$

250 

Capital investments accrued but not yet paid

$

366 

$

223 

$

100 

166 

224 

205 

Capital lease financings

 

19 

 

 -

 

13 

Locomotives sold for material credits

-

18 

-

Finance lease financings

-

-

12 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes, net of refunds

$

(2,112)

$

(1,347)

$

(2,156)

$

(1,214)

$

(1,382)

$

(1,205)

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

(666)

 

(652)

 

(592)

(1,050)

(1,033)

(728)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


4851


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

Common
Shares

Treasury
Shares

 

Common
Shares

Paid-in-
Surplus

Retained
Earnings

Treasury
Stock

AOCI
[a]

Total

Balance at January 1, 2015

1,110.1 (226.7)

 

 

$   2,775 

 

$   4,321 

 

$   27,367 

 

$   (12,064)

 

$   (1,210)

 

$    21,189 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

4,772 

 

-

 

-

 

4,772 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

-

 

15 

 

15 

Conversion, stock option
   exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.3 0.8 

 

 

 

96 

 

 -

 

-

 

-

 

97 

Share repurchases (Note 19)

 -

(35.3)

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(3,465)

 

-

 

(3,465)

Cash dividends declared
   ($2.20 per share)

 -

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,906)

 

-

 

-

 

(1,906)

Balance at December 31, 2015

1,110.4 (261.2)

 

 

$   2,776 

 

$   4,417 

 

$   30,233 

 

$   (15,529)

 

$   (1,195)

 

$    20,702 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

4,233 

 

-

 

-

 

4,233 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

-

 

(77)

 

(77)

Conversion, stock option
   exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.6 1.1 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

53 

 

-

 

58 

Share repurchases (Note 19)

 -

(35.1)

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(3,105)

 

-

 

(3,105)

Cash dividends declared
   ($2.255 per share)

 -

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,879)

 

-

 

-

 

(1,879)

Balance at December 31, 2016

1,111.0 (295.2)

 

 

$   2,777 

 

$   4,421 

 

$   32,587 

 

$   (18,581)

 

$   (1,272)

 

$    19,932 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

10,712 

 

-

 

-

 

10,712 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

-

 

131 

 

131 

Conversion, stock option
   exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.4 1.1 

 

 

 

55 

 

 -

 

20 

 

-

 

76 

Share repurchases (Note 19)

 -

(36.4)

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(4,013)

 

-

 

(4,013)

Cash dividends declared
   ($2.48 per share)

 -

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

(1,982)

 

-

 

-

 

(1,982)

Balance at December 31, 2017

1,111.4 (330.5)

 

 

$   2,778 

 

$   4,476 

 

$   41,317 

 

$   (22,574)

 

$   (1,141)

 

$    24,856 

Millions

Common
Shares

Treasury
Shares

Common
Shares

Paid-in-
Surplus

Retained
Earnings

Treasury
Stock

AOCI
[a]

Total

Balance at January 1, 2018

1,111.4 

(330.5)

$   2,778 

$   4,476 

$   41,317 

$   (22,574)

$   (1,141)

$    24,856 

Net income

 

 

-

-

5,966 

-

-

5,966 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

-

-

-

26 

26 

Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.3 

1.1 

65 

-

33 

-

99 

Share repurchase programs
(Note 18)

-

(57.2)

-

(92)

-

(8,133)

-

(8,225)

Cash dividends declared
($3.06 per share)

-

-

-

-

(2,299)

-

-

(2,299)

Reclassification due to ASU
2018-02 adoption [b]

-

-

300 

-

(300)

-

Balance at December 31, 2018

1,111.7 

(386.6)

$   2,779 

$   4,449 

$   45,284 

$   (30,674)

$   (1,415)

$    20,423 

Net income

 

 

-

-

5,919 

-

-

5,919 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

-

-

-

-

59 

59 

Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.3 

1.7 

46 

-

82 

-

129 

Share repurchase programs
(Note 18)

-

(35.0)

-

28 

-

(5,832)

-

(5,804)

Cash dividends declared
($3.70 per share)

-

-

-

-

(2,598)

-

-

(2,598)

Balance at December 31, 2019

1,112.0 

(419.9)

$   2,780 

$   4,523 

$   48,605 

$   (36,424)

$   (1,356)

$    18,128 

Net income

 

 

-

-

5,349 

-

-

5,349 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

-

-

-

-

(237)

(237)

Conversion, stock option
exercises, forfeitures, and other

0.2 

1.1 

31 

-

19 

-

51 

Share repurchase programs
(Note 18)

-

(22.1)

-

310 

-

(4,015)

-

(3,705)

Cash dividends declared
($3.88 per share)

-

-

-

-

(2,628)

-

-

(2,628)

Balance at December 31, 2020

1,112.2 

(440.9)

$   2,781 

$   4,864 

$   51,326 

$   (40,420)

$   (1,593)

$    16,958 

[a]

AOCI = Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (Note 10)

[a]AOCI = Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/Loss (Note 9)

[b]ASU 2018-02 is the Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows entities the option to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings the income tax effects that remain stranded in AOCI resulting from the application of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


4952


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the “Corporation”, “Company”, “UPC”, “we”, “us”, and “our” mean Union Pacific Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Union Pacific Railroad Company, which will be separately referred to herein as “UPRR” or the “Railroad”.

1. Nature of Operations

Operations and Segmentation – We are a Class I railroad operating in the U.S. Our network includes 32,12232,313 route miles, linkingconnecting Pacific Coast and Gulf Coast ports with the Midwest and Eastern U.S. gateways and providing several corridors to key Mexican and Canadian gateways. We own 26,04226,069 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases. We serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the Atlantic Coast, the Pacific Coast, the Southeast, the Southwest, Canada, and Mexico. Export and import traffic is moved through Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast ports and across the Mexican and Canadian borders.

The Railroad, along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates, is our one1 reportable operating segment. Although we provide and analyze revenue by commodity group, we treat the financial results of the Railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network. Our operating revenues are primarily derived from contracts with customers for the transportation of freight from origin to destination. The following table providesrepresents a disaggregation of our freight revenue by commodity group:and other revenues:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Agricultural Products

$

3,685 

$

3,625 

$

3,581 

Automotive

 

1,998 

 

2,000 

 

2,154 

Chemicals

 

3,596 

 

3,474 

 

3,543 

Coal

 

2,645 

 

2,440 

 

3,237 

Industrial Products

 

4,078 

 

3,348 

 

3,808 

Intermodal

 

3,835 

 

3,714 

 

4,074 

Total freight revenues

$

19,837 

$

18,601 

$

20,397 

Other revenues

 

1,403 

 

1,340 

 

1,416 

Total operating revenues

$

21,240 

$

19,941 

$

21,813 

Millions

2020

2019

2018

Bulk

$

5,960 

$

6,529 

$

7,069 

Industrial

6,622 

7,472 

7,689 

Premium

5,669 

6,242 

6,626 

Total freight revenues

$

18,251 

$

20,243 

$

21,384 

Other subsidiary revenues

743 

880 

881 

Accessorial revenues

473 

514 

502 

Other

66 

71 

65 

Total operating revenues

$

19,533 

$

21,708 

$

22,832 

Although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the U.S., the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products we transport are outside the U.S. Each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from Mexico. Included in the above table are freight revenues from our Mexico business which amounted to $2.1 billion in 2020, $2.3 billion in 2017, $2.22019, and $2.5 billion in 2016, and $2.2 billion in 2015.2018.

Basis of Presentation – The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) as codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation – The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Union Pacific Corporation and all of its subsidiaries. Investments in affiliated companies (20% to 50% owned) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All intercompany transactions are eliminated. We currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements.

Cash, and Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash – Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less. Amounts included in restricted cash represent those required to be set aside by contractual agreement.

53


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

Millions

2020

2019 

2018

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1,799 

$

831 

$

1,273 

Restricted cash equivalents in other current assets

13 

42 

Restricted cash equivalents in other assets

12 

12 

13 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
equivalents shown on the Statement of Cash Flows:

$

1,818 

$

856 

$

1,328 

Accounts Receivable – Accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is based upon historical losses, credit worthiness of customers, and current economic conditions. Receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

50


Investments – Investments represent our investments in affiliated companies (20% to 50% owned) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies (less than 20% owned) accounted for under theat cost methodas there are not readily determinable fair values for such investments. Our portion of accounting.  The results of operations for ourincome/loss on equity method investments that are integral to our operations are recorded in operating expenses.

Materials and Supplies – Materials and supplies are carried at the lower of average cost or market.net realizable value.

Property and Depreciation – Properties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment, and yard and switching tracks, and electronic yards)tracks), for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics, use, and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad assets by means of depreciation studies. Under the group method of depreciation, no gain or loss is recognized when depreciable property is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets – We review long-lived assets, including identifiable intangibles, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the long-lived assets, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value as measured by the discounted cash flows.value.

Revenue Recognition Freight revenues are derived from contracts with customers. We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability of consideration is probable. Our contracts include private agreements, private rate/letter quotes, public circulars/tariffs, and interline/foreign agreements. The performance obligation in our contracts is typically delivering a specific commodity from a place of origin to a place of destination and our commitment begins with the tendering and acceptance of a freight bill of lading and is satisfied upon delivery at destination. We consider each freight shipment to be a distinct performance obligation.

We recognize freight revenues over time as freight moves from origin to destination. The allocation of revenue between reporting periods is based on the relative transit time in each reporting period with expenses recognized as incurred. Other revenues, which include revenues earned byOutstanding performance obligations related to freight moves in transit totaled $151 million at December 31, 2020, and $127 million at December 31, 2019, and are expected to be recognized in the following quarter as we satisfy our subsidiaries, revenues from our commuter rail operations,remaining performance obligations and accessorial revenue, are recognized as servicedeliver freight to destination. The transaction price is performed or contractual obligations are met.generally specified in a contract and may be dependent on the commodity, origin/destination, and route. Customer incentives, which are primarily provided for shipping a specified cumulative volume or shipping to/from specific locations or based on cumulative volumes, are recorded as a reduction to operating revenuesrevenues. Customer incentives that include variable consideration based on actualcumulative volumes are

54


estimated using the expected value method, which is based on available historical, current, and forecasted volumes, and recognized as the related performance obligation is satisfied.

Under typical payment terms, our customers pay us after each performance obligation is satisfied and there are no material contract assets or projected future customer shipments.liabilities associated with our freight revenues. Outstanding freight receivables are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as Accounts Receivables, net.

Freight revenue related to interline transportation services that involve other railroads are reported on a net basis. The portion of the gross amount billed to customers that is remitted by the Company to another party is not reflected as freight revenue.

Other revenues consist primarily of revenues earned by our other subsidiaries (primarily logistics and commuter rail operations) and accessorial revenues. Other subsidiary revenues are generally recognized over time as shipments move from origin to destination. The allocation of revenue between reporting periods is based on the relative transit time in each reporting period with expenses recognized as incurred. Accessorial revenues are recognized at a point in time as performance obligations are satisfied.

Translation of Foreign Currency – Our portion of the assets and liabilities related to foreign investments are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Unrealized gains or losses are reflected within common shareholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Fair Value Measurements – We use a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels include:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

We have applied fair value measurements to our short term investments, pension plan assets, impairment of long-lived assets, and short- and long-term debt.

Stock-Based Compensation – We have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive nonvested stock options, nonvested retention shares, and nonvested stock units. We refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as “retention awards”. We have elected to issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings, while new shares are issued when retention shares are granted.

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees, and directors, including stock options. Compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards (generally the vesting period). The fair value of retention awards is the closing stock price on the date of grant, while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

51


Earnings Per Share – Basic earnings per share are calculated on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and stock-based awards where the conversion of such instruments would be dilutive.

Income Taxes – We account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. These expected future tax consequences are measured based on current tax law; the effects of future tax legislation are not anticipated. Future tax legislation, such as a change in the corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized,

55


based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset.

We recognize tax benefits that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.

Leases We lease certain locomotives, freight cars, and other property for use in our rail operations. We determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. Operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments, discounted using our collateralized incremental borrowing rate, over the lease term at commencement date. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Operating leases are included in operating lease assets, accounts payable and other current liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Finance leases are included in net properties, debt due within one year, and debt due after one year on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and reported in equipment and other rents and financing lease expense is recorded as depreciation and interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components and we have elected to not separate lease and non-lease components for all classes of underlying assets. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Leases with initial terms in excess of 12 months are recorded as operating or financing leases in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits – We incur certain employment-related expenses associated with pensions and postretirement health benefits. In order to measure the expense associated with these benefits, we must make various assumptions including discount rates used to value certain liabilities, expected return on plan assets used to fund these expenses, compensation increases, employee turnover rates, anticipated mortality rates, and expected future health care costs. The assumptions used by us are based on our historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. We use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability associated with these benefits.

Personal Injury – The cost of injuries to employees and others on our property is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability. Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value. Legal fees and incidental costs are expensed as incurred.

Asbestos – We estimate a liability for asserted and unasserted asbestos-related claims based on an assessment of the number and value of those claims. We use a statistical analysis to assist us in properly measuring our potential liability. Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Legal fees and incidental costs are expensed as incurred.

Environmental – When environmental issues have been identified with respect to property currently or formerly owned, leased, or otherwise used in the conduct of our business, we perform, with the assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on such property. We expense the cost of the assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where our obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated. We do not discount our environmental liabilities when the timing of the anticipated cash payments is not fixed or readily determinable. Legal fees and incidental costs are expensed as incurred.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of certain contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual future results may differ from such estimates.

3. Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition guidance in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition.  The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the

52


consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in the exchange for those goods or services. This may require the use of more judgment and estimates in order to correctly recognize the revenue expected as an outcome of each specific performance obligation. Additionally, this guidance will require the disclosure of the nature, amount, and timing of revenue arising from contracts so as to aid in the understanding of the users of financial statements.

This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.  The Company has analyzed our freight and other revenues and we expect to continue to recognize freight revenues as freight moves from origin to destination and to recognize other revenues as identified performance obligations are satisfied.  We have also analyzed freight and other revenues in the context of the new guidance on principal versus agent considerations and evaluated the required new disclosures. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective transition method.  The ASU did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 (ASU 2016-01), Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). ASU 2016-01 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07 (ASU 2017-07), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (Topic 715). ASU 2017-07 requires the service cost component be reported separately from the other components of net benefit costs in the income statement, provides explicit guidance on the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement, and allows only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. This standard is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and we intend to adopt the standard beginning in 2018 using retrospective adoption.  The Company currently records service costs and net benefit costs within compensation and benefits expense. Upon adoption, the service cost will be recorded within compensation and benefits expense, and the other components of net benefit costs, including $69 million related to the 2017 workforce reduction plan as described in Note 4, will be recorded in other income. The retrospective impact of future adoption is shown in the table below:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

 

2017 

 

2016 

 

2015 

Increase/(decrease) in operating income

$

45 

$

(29)

$

30 

Increase/(decrease) in other income

 

(45)

 

29 

 

(30)

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02), Leases (Subtopic(Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 will requirerequires companies to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. For public companies, thisWe implemented an enterprise-wide lease management system to support the new reporting requirements, and effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). We elected an initial application date of January 1, 2019, and did not recast comparative periods in transition to the new standard. In addition, at the date of adoption, we elected certain practical expedients, which permit us to not reassess whether existing contracts are or contain

56


leases, to not reassess the lease classification of any existing leases, to not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases, and to not separate lease and nonlease components for all classes of underlying assets. Also, at the date of adoption, we elected to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet for all classes of underlying assets. Adoption of the new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, and expects that the adoption will resultresulted in an increase in the Company’s assets and liabilities of overapproximately $2 billion. The ASU did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows.

OnIn June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 (ASU 2016-13), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the existing incurred credit loss model for anexpected credit loss model. Effective January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-14 (ASU 2018-14), Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. Effective January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2018-14, and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement disclosure requirements.

In December 22, 20172019, the SEC staffFASB issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118)Standards Update No. 2019-12 (ASU 2019-12), Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).  SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the enactment date for companies to completesimplifies the accounting underand disclosure requirements for income taxes by clarifying existing guidance to improve consistency in application of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740. In accordance with SAB 118, aThe company must reflectadopted the income tax effects of those aspectsASU on January 1, 2021 (the effective date). Adoption of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740standard is complete. To the extent thatnot expected to have a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but for which they are able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional amount in the financial statements. Provisional treatment is proper in light of anticipated additional guidance from various taxing authorities, the SEC, the FASB, and even the Joint Committee on Taxation.  Provisional treatment is also necessary if the company is waiting for final financial information from domestic and foreign equity investments.  If a company cannot determine a provisional amount to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740material impact on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act.

53


4. Workforce Reduction Plan

On August 16, 2017, the Company approved and commenced a management and administrative personnel reorganization plan (the “Plan”) furthering its on-going efforts to increase efficiency and more effectively align Company resources. The Plan implemented productivity initiatives identified during a recently completed Company-wide organizational review that included the reduction of approximately 460 management positions and 250 agreement positions. The Plan resulted in a pretax charge recognized in the third quarter of 2017 within compensation and benefits expense in ourCompany’s Consolidated Statements of Income.Income, Financial Position, and Cash Flows.

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2020-04 (ASU 2020-04), Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. This charge consisted of management employee termination benefits, including pension expenses, severance costs,guidance was effective beginning on March 12, 2020, and acceleration of equity compensation expense as shown incan be adopted on a prospective basis no later than December 31, 2022, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the table below.  The actions associated witheffect that the Plan are substantially complete,new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and we do not expect to incur additional charges for the Plan in subsequent years.related disclosures.

Millions

Compensation and

for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Benefits Expense

Pension

$

69 

Severance

12 

Equity Compensation

Total

$

86 

5.4. Stock Options and Other Stock Plans

In April 2000, the shareholders approved the Union Pacific Corporation 2000 Directors Plan (Directors Plan) whereby 2,200,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors. Under the Directors Plan, each non-employee director, upon his or her initial election to the Board of Directors, receivesreceived a grant of 4,000 retention shares or retention stock units. Prior to December 31, 2007, each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock, not to exceed 20,000 shares during any calendar year, determined by dividing 60,000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such Board of Directors meeting, with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares. In September 2007,July 2018, the Board of Directors eliminated the annual payment of optionsretention grant for 2008directors newly elected in 2018 and all future years. As of December 31, 2017, 44,0002020, 32,000 restricted shares and no options were outstanding under the Directors Plan.

The Union Pacific Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (2004 Plan) was approved by shareholders in April 2004. The 2004 Plan reserved 84,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance, plus any shares subject to awards made under previous plans that were outstanding on April 16, 2004, and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 Plan. Under the 2004 Plan, non-qualified options, stock appreciation rights, retention shares, stock units, and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, 1,557,3502020, 81,784 options and 962 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 Plan. We no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan.

The Union Pacific Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (2013 Plan) was approved by shareholders in May 2013. The 2013 Plan reserved 78,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance, plus any shares subject to awards made under previous plans as of February 28, 2013, that are subsequently cancelled, expired, forfeited, or otherwise not issued under previous plans. Under the 2013 Plan, non-qualified options, incentive stock options, retention shares, stock units, and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2013 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, 4,072,5142020, 2,486,758 options and 3,450,6001,989,208 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2013 Plan.

57


Pursuant to the above plans 72,151,415;  73,745,250;69,867,405; 70,318,887; and 76,548,520;70,730,692; shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation – We have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive nonvested stock options, nonvested retention shares, and nonvested stock units. We refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as “retention awards”. We have elected to issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings, while new shares are issued when retention shares are granted.

54


Information regarding stock-based compensation appears in the table below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Stock-based compensation, before tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

$

19 

$

16 

$

17 

$

15 

$

16 

$

17 

Retention awards

 

84 

 

66 

 

81 

58 

77 

79 

Total stock-based compensation, before tax

$

103 

$

82 

$

98 

$

73 

$

93 

$

96 

Excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans

$

44 

$

28 

$

62 

$

55 

$

52 

$

28 

Stock Options – We estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-Average Assumptions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.0% 

 

1.3% 

 

1.3% 

1.5%

2.5%

2.6%

Dividend yield

 

2.3% 

 

2.9% 

 

1.8% 

2.1%

2.2%

2.3%

Expected life (years)

 

5.3 

 

5.1 

 

5.1 

4.9

5.2

5.3

Volatility

 

21.7% 

 

23.2% 

 

23.4% 

23.4%

22.7%

21.1%

Weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted

$

18.19 

$

11.36 

$

22.30 

$

32.20

$

30.37

$

21.70

The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the expected dividend yield is calculated as the ratio of dividends paid per share of common stock to the stock price on the date of grant; the expected life is based on historical and expected exercise behavior; and expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock price over the expected life of the option.

A summary of stock option activity during 20172020 is presented below:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Options (thous.)

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term

Aggregate Intrinsic Value (millions)

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

6,162 

$

73.13 5.9 

yrs.

$

205 

Granted

1,086 

 

107.30 

N/A

 

 

N/A

Exercised

(1,448)

 

56.69 

N/A

 

 

N/A

Forfeited or expired

(170)

 

92.18 

N/A

 

 

N/A

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

5,630 

$

83.37 5.8 

yrs.

$

286 

Vested or expected to vest
     at December 31, 2017

5,607 

$

83.25 5.8 

yrs.

$

285 

Options exercisable at December 31, 2017

3,466 

$

75.96 4.2 

yrs.

$

201 

Options (thous.)

Weighted-Average Exercise Price

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term

Aggregate Intrinsic Value (millions)

Outstanding at January 1, 2020

3,502 

$

113.38 

6.1 

yrs.

$

236 

Granted

558 

176.63 

N/A

N/A

Exercised

(1,402)

100.41 

N/A

N/A

Forfeited or expired

(89)

162.52 

N/A

N/A

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

2,569 

$

132.49 

6.4 

yrs.

$

195 

Vested or expected to vest
     at December 31, 2020

2,538 

$

132.11 

6.4 

yrs.

$

193 

Options exercisable at December 31, 2020

1,547 

$

112.98 

5.3 

yrs.

$

147 

Stock options are granted at the closing price on the date of grant, have ten-year10 year contractual terms, and vest no later than three3 years from the date of grant. NoneNaN of the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017,2020, are subject to performance or market-based vesting conditions.

58


At December 31, 2017,2020, there was $19$15 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.10.9 years. Additional information regarding stock option exercises appears in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Intrinsic value of stock options exercised

$

88 

$

52 

$

50 

$

120 

$

193 

$

83 

Cash received from option exercises

 

59 

 

39 

 

27 

95 

130 

76 

Treasury shares repurchased for employee payroll taxes

 

(18)

 

(15)

 

(12)

(24)

(37)

(20)

Tax benefit realized from option exercises

 

34 

 

20 

 

19 

28 

48 

21 

Aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options vested

 

20 

 

19 

 

19 

15 

15 

19 

55


Retention Awards – The fair value of retention awards is based on the closing price of the stock on the grant date. Dividends and dividend equivalents are paid to participants during the vesting periods.

Changes in our retention awards during 20172020 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

Shares (thous.)

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

Shares (thous.)

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2017

2,789 

$

84.68 

Nonvested at January 1, 2020

1,898 

$

112.12 

Granted

575 

 

107.51 

315 

185.99 

Vested

(894)

 

70.91 

(645)

77.74 

Forfeited

(157)

 

94.01 

(92)

141.83 

Nonvested at December 31, 2017

2,313 

$

95.04 

Nonvested at December 31, 2020

1,476 

$

141.06 

Retention awards are granted at no cost to the employee or non-employee director and vest over periods lasting up to four4 years. At December 31, 2017,2020, there was $87$88 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested retention awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.61.5 years.

Performance Retention Awards – In February 2017,2020, our Board of Directors approved performance stock unit grants. The basic terms of these performance stock units are identical to those granted in February 2016,2019, except for different annual return on invested capital (ROIC) performance targets. The 2016 and 2017 plansplan also include the addition ofincludes relative operating income growth (OIG) as a modifier compared to the companies included in the S&P 500 Industrials Index. We define ROIC as net operating profit adjusted for interest expense (including interest on the present value ofaverage operating leases)lease liabilities) and taxes on interest divided by average invested capital adjusted for the present value ofaverage operating leases.lease liabilities. The modifier can be up to +/- 25% of the award earned based on the ROIC achieved.

Stock units awarded to selected employees under these grants are subject to continued employment for 37 months and the attainment of certain levels of ROIC, and for the 2016 and 2017 plans, modified for the relative OIG. We expense the fair value of the units that are probable of being earned based on our forecasted ROIC over the 3-year performance period, and with respect to the third year of the 2016 and 2017 plans,plan, the relative OIG modifier. We measure the fair value of these performance stock units based upon the closing price of the underlying common stock as of the date of grant, reduced by the present value of estimated future dividends.grant. Dividend equivalents are accumulated during the service period and paid to participants only after the units are earned.

The assumptions used to calculate the present value of estimated future dividends related to the February 2017 grant were as follows:

2017 

Dividend per share per quarter

$

0.605 

Risk-free interest rate at date of grant

1.5% 

Changes in our performance retention awards during 20172020 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

Shares (thous.)

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

Shares (thous.)

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2017

1,145 

$

86.23 

Nonvested at January 1, 2020

929 

$

123.32 

Granted

461 

 

101.38 

287 

177.23 

Vested

(255)

 

83.06 

(339)

102.97 

Unearned

(110)

 

83.06 

(8)

153.89 

Forfeited

(103)

 

91.36 

(96)

153.74 

Nonvested at December 31, 2017

1,138 

$

92.92 

Nonvested at December 31, 2020

773 

$

148.17 

59


At December 31, 2017,2020, there was $39$16 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.50.9 years. This expense is subject to achievement of the performance measures established for the performance stock unit grants.

56


6.5. Retirement Plans

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Pension Plans – We provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified (supplemental) pension plans. Qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment, with specific reductions made for early retirements. Non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2018, are no longer eligible for pension benefits, but will beare eligible for an enhanced 401(k) planbenefit as described below in other retirement programs.

Other Postretirement Benefits (OPEB) – We provide medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees hired before January 1, 2004. These benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are paid.

Funded Status

We are required by GAAP to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and OPEB plans as an asset or liability. The funded status represents the difference between the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the fair value of the plan assets. Our non-qualified (supplemental) pension plan is unfunded by design. The PBO of the pension plans is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of assumed future compensation increases. The PBO of the OPEB plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation, as the present value of the OPEB liabilities is not affected by compensation increases. Plan assets are measured at fair value. We use a December 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans.

Changes in our PBO and plan assets were as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded Status

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Millions

2017 2016 2017 2016 

2020

2019

2020

2019

Projected Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

$

4,110 

$

3,958 

$

334 

$

329 

$

4,847 

$

4,181 

$

205 

$

298 

Service cost

 

90 

 

84 

 

 

91 

80 

Interest cost

 

142 

 

143 

 

10 

 

11 

137 

160 

Plan curtailment cost

 

20 

 

 -

 

(1)

 

 -

Special termination cost

 

49 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Actuarial loss

 

382 

 

124 

 

 

16 

Plan amendment

-

-

(2)

(92)

Actuarial (gain)/loss

812 

656 

-

11 

Gross benefits paid

 

(264)

 

(199)

 

(22)

 

(23)

(229)

(230)

(19)

(22)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

$

4,529 

$

4,110 

$

330 

$

334 

$

5,658 

$

4,847 

$

190 

$

205 

Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$

3,748 

$

3,544 

$

 -

$

 -

$

4,528 

$

3,887 

$

-

$

-

Actual return on plan assets

 

716 

 

279 

 

 -

 

 -

Voluntary funded pension plan contributions

 

 -

 

100 

 

 -

 

 -

Actual (loss)/return on plan assets

686 

841 

-

-

Non-qualified plan benefit contributions

 

24 

 

24 

 

22 

 

23 

31 

30 

19 

22 

Gross benefits paid

 

(264)

 

(199)

 

(22)

 

(23)

(229)

(230)

(19)

(22)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$

4,224 

$

3,748 

$

 -

$

 -

$

5,016 

$

4,528 

$

-

$

-

Funded status at end of year

$

(305)

$

(362)

$

(330)

$

(334)

$

(642)

$

(319)

$

(190)

$

(205)

Actuarial gains and losses that increased the PBO were driven by a decrease in 2020 discount rates from 3.26% to 2.42%.

60


Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 20162019 consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Millions

2017 2016 2017 2016 

2020 

2019

2020

2019

Noncurrent assets

$

196 

$

67 

$

 -

$

-

$

$

203 

$

-

$

-

Current liabilities

 

(27)

 

(24)

 

(23)

 

(24)

(30)

(29)

(18)

(20)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(474)

 

(405)

 

(307)

 

(310)

(620)

(493)

(172)

(185)

Net amounts recognized at end of year

$

(305)

$

(362)

$

(330)

$

(334)

$

(642)

$

(319)

$

(190)

$

(205)

57


Pre-tax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)loss as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 20162019 consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

2016

2020

2019

Millions

Pension

OPEB

Total

Pension

OPEB

Total

Pension

OPEB

Total

Pension

OPEB

Total

Prior service cost

$

 -

$

(1)

$

(1)

$

-

$

(2)

$

(2)

$

-

$

84 

$

84 

$

-

$

95 

$

95 

Net actuarial loss

 

(1,533)

 

(120)

 

(1,653)

 

(1,681)

 

(123)

 

(1,804)

(1,805)

(98)

(1,903)

(1,501)

(104)

(1,605)

Total

$

(1,533)

$

(121)

$

(1,654)

$

(1,681)

$

(125)

$

(1,806)

$

(1,805)

$

(14)

$

(1,819)

$

(1,501)

$

(9)

$

(1,510)

Pre-tax changes recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss)loss during 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 20152018 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Millions

2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 

2020 

2019

2018

2020

2019

2018

Prior service credit

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

$

92 

$

-

Net actuarial (loss)/gain

$

67 

$

(112)

$

(31)

$

(6)

$

(16)

$

18 

(408)

(88)

(40)

-

(11)

20 

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior service cost/(credit)

 

 -

 

-

 

 -

 

 

(9)

 

(10)

-

-

-

(14)

(7)

Actuarial loss

 

81 

 

83 

 

106 

 

 

10 

 

13 

104 

67 

93 

10 

Total

$

148 

$

(29)

$

75 

$

$

(15)

$

21 

$

(304)

$

(21)

$

53 

$

(5)

$

81 

$

31 

Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) expected to be amortized into net periodic cost during 2018:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

Pension

OPEB

Total

Prior service credit

$

 -

$

(1)

$

(1)

Net actuarial loss

 

(90)

 

(9)

 

(99)

Total

$

(90)

$

(10)

$

(100)

Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation– The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is the present value of benefits earned to date, assuming no future compensation growth. The underfunded accumulated benefit obligation represents the difference between the ABO and the fair value of plan assets. At December 31, 2017, and 2016, the non-qualified (supplemental) plan ABO was $481 million and $412million, respectively.

The following table discloses only the PBO, ABO, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans where the accumulated benefit obligation is in excess of the fair value of the plan assets as of December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Underfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation

 

Millions

2017 2016 

2020 

2019

Projected benefit obligation

$

501 

$

428 

$

605 

$

522 

Accumulated benefit obligation

$

481 

$

412 

$

560 

$

498 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 -

 

 -

-

-

Underfunded accumulated benefit obligation

$

(481)

$

(412)

$

(560)

$

(498)

The ABO for all defined benefit pension plans was $4.2$5.2 billion and $3.9$4.5 billion at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

5861


Assumptions – The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:

 

 

 

 

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Percentages

2017 2016 2017 2016 

2020

2019

2020

2019

Discount rate

3.62% 4.20% 3.53% 4.00% 

2.42%

3.26%

2.22%

3.13%

Compensation increase

4.20% 4.20% 

N/A

N/A

4.40%

4.10%

N/A

N/A

Health care cost trend rate (employees under 65)

N/A

N/A

6.09% 6.31% 

N/A

N/A

5.42%

5.64%

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

N/A

N/A

4.50% 4.50% 

N/A

N/A

4.50%

4.50%

Year ultimate trend rate reached

N/A

N/A

2038 2038 

N/A

N/A

2038

2038

Expense

Both pension and OPEB expense are determined based upon the annual service cost of benefits (the actuarial cost of benefits earned during a period) and the interest cost on those liabilities, less the expected return on plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets that recognizes changes in fair value over a five-year5 year period. This practice is intended to reduce year-to-year volatility in pension expense, but it can have the effect of delaying the recognition of differences between actual returns on assets and expected returns based on long-term rate of return assumptions. Differences in actual experience in relation to assumptions are not recognized in net income immediately, but are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive incomeincome/loss and, if necessary, amortized as pension or OPEB expense.

The workforceOn June 30, 2019, the OPEB plan was remeasured to reflect an announced plan amendment effective January 1, 2020, that reduced and eliminated certain medical benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees. This negative plan amendment resulted in a reduction plan initiated in the third quarteraccumulated postretirement benefit obligation of 2017 includedapproximately $92 million with a curtailment losscorresponding adjustment of $20$69 million and a special termination benefitin other comprehensive income, net of $49$23 million in deferred taxes. This amount is being amortized as a resultreduction of a remeasurement as future net periodic OPEB cost over approximately 8 years, which represents the future remaining service period of September 30, 2017, due to the eliminated future service for approximately 460 managementeligible employees.  These amounts were recognized in 2017 within compensation and benefits expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.  In connection with this remeasurement, the Company also updated the pension effective discount rate assumption from 4.20% to 3.81%.

The components of our net periodic pension and OPEB cost were as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Millions

2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

2020

2019

2018

Net Periodic Benefit Cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

$

90 

$

84 

$

106 

$

$

$

$

91 

$

80 

$

105 

$

$

$

Interest cost

 

142 

 

143 

 

163 

 

10 

 

11 

 

13 

137 

160 

145 

10 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(267)

 

(267)

 

(255)

 

-

 

-

 

 -

(282)

(273)

(272)

 

 

 

Plan curtailment cost

 

20 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Special termination cost

 

49 

 

 -

 

 -

 

-

 

-

 

-

Amortization of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior service cost/(credit)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

(9)

 

(10)

-

-

-

(14)

(7)

Actuarial loss

 

81 

 

83 

 

106 

 

 

10 

 

13 

104 

67 

93 

10 

Net periodic benefit cost

$

115 

$

43 

$

120 

$

22 

$

13 

$

19 

$

50 

$

34 

$

71 

$

(1)

$

10 

$

23 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5962


Assumptions – The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine expense were as follows:

 

 

Pension

OPEB

Pension

OPEB

Percentages

2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

2020

2019

2018

Discount rate for benefit obligations

4.09% 4.37% 3.94% 3.89% 4.13% 3.74% 

3.26%

4.23%

3.62%

3.14%

3.79%

3.54%

Discount rate for interest on benefit obligations

3.47% 3.65% 3.94% 3.25% 3.34% 3.74% 

2.89%

3.94%

3.27%

2.68%

3.40%

3.14%

Discount rate for service cost

4.41% 4.69% 3.94% 4.25% 4.59% 3.74% 

3.42%

4.33%

3.77%

3.21%

3.92%

3.71%

Discount rate for interest on service cost

4.27% 4.55% 3.94% 4.11% 4.44% 3.74% 

3.36%

4.30%

3.72%

3.14%

3.85%

3.64%

Expected return on plan assets

7.00% 7.50% 7.50% 

N/A

N/A

7.00%

7.00%

7.00%

N/A

N/A

Compensation increase

4.13% 4.20% 4.00% 

N/A

N/A

4.10%

4.10%

4.19%

N/A

N/A

Health care cost trend rate (employees under 65)

N/A

N/A

6.31% 6.52% 6.34% 

N/A

N/A

5.64%

5.87%

6.09%

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

N/A

N/A

4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 

N/A

N/A

4.50%

4.50%

4.50%

Year ultimate trend reached

N/A

N/A

2038 2038 2028 

N/A

N/A

2038

2038

2038

Beginning in 2016, weWe measure the service cost and interest cost components of our net periodic benefit cost by using individual spot discount rates matched with separate cash flows for each future year. The discount rates were based on a yield curve of high quality corporate bonds. The expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into account current and expected market conditions. The actual return/(loss)loss on pension plan assets, net of fees, was approximately 19%16% in 2017, 8%2020, 20% in 2016,2019, and (1)%(2%) in 2015.2018.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the expense and liabilities reported for health care plans. The assumed health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions. The 20182021 assumed health care cost trend rate for employees under 65 is 6.09%5.42%. It is assumed the rate will decrease gradually to an ultimate rate of 4.5% in 2038 and will remain at that level.  A one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects on OPEB:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Millions

One % pt.
Increase

One % pt.
Decrease

Effect on total service and interest cost components

$

$

(1)

Effect on accumulated benefit obligation

 

19 

 

(16)

Cash Contributions

The following table details our cash contributions, if any, for the qualified pension plans and the benefit payments for the non-qualified (supplemental) pension and OPEB plans:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Pension

 

 

Millions

Qualified

Non-qualified

OPEB

2017

$

 -

$

24 

$

22 

2016

 

 

100 

 

24 

 

23 

Pension

Millions

Qualified

Non-qualified

OPEB

2020

$

-

$

31 

$

19 

2019

-

30 

22 

Our policy with respect to funding the qualified plans is to fund at least the minimum required by law and not more than the maximum amount deductible for tax purposes. All contributions made to the qualified pension plans were voluntary and were made with cash generated from operations.

The non-qualified pension and OPEB plans are not funded and are not subject to any minimum regulatory funding requirements. Benefit payments for each year represent supplemental pension payments and claims paid for medical and life insurance. We anticipate our 20182021 supplemental pension and OPEB payments will be made from cash generated from operations.

60


Benefit Payments

The following table details expected benefit payments for the years 20182021 through 2027:2030:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Millions

Pension

OPEB

2018

$

212 

$

23 

2019

 

212 

 

22 

2020

 

211 

 

22 

2021

 

212 

 

21 

2022

 

213 

 

20 

Years 2023 - 2027

 

1,101 

 

90 

Millions

Pension

OPEB

2021

$

228 

$

18 

2022

226 

14 

2023

226 

14 

2024

225 

10 

2025

226 

Years 2026 - 2030

1,158 

42 

63


Asset Allocation Strategy

Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, and target allocation for 2018,2021, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Plan Assets

Percentage of Plan Assets

Target

 

December 31,

Target

December 31,

Allocation 2018

 

2017 2016 

Allocation 2021

2020

2019

Equity securities

60% to 70%

 

69% 68% 

50% to 60%

63%

63%

Debt securities

20% to 30%

 

22 21 

40% to 50%

34  

31  

Real estate

2% to 8%

 

0% to 2%

3  

6  

Commodities

4% to 6%

 

Total

Total

 

100% 100% 

Total

100%

100%

The investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a broadly diversified portfolio designed to achieve our target average long-term rate of return. We decreased the expected rate of return for 2021 from 7% to 6.25% due to a shift of 7.0%.certain assets from equity to debt in alignment with our 2021 target asset allocation. While we believe we can achieve a long-term average rate of return of 7.0%6.25%, we cannot be certain that the portfolio will perform to our expectations. Assets are strategically allocated among equity, debt, and other investments in order to achieve a diversification level that reduces fluctuations in investment returns. Asset allocation target ranges for equity, debt, and other portfolios are evaluated at least every three years with the assistance of an independent consulting firm. Actual asset allocations are monitored monthly, and rebalancing actions are executed at least quarterly, as needed.

The pension plan investments are held in a Master Trust. The majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons and are expected to do so in the future. Correspondingly, equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments. Equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plans’ assets in high quality debt securities. The average credit rating of the debt portfolio exceededwas A and A+ at both December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016.2019, respectively. The debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in U.S. Treasury, mortgage, and corporate securities. The weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 1317 years and 14 years, respectively at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016, respectively.2019.

The investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by UPC is explicitly prohibited by the plan for both the equity and debt portfolios, other than through index fund holdings.

Fair Value Measurements

The pension plan assets are valued at fair value. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Temporary Cash Investments – These investments consist of U.S. dollars, and foreign currencies, and commercial paper held in master trust accounts at The Northern Trust Company (the Trustee). Foreign currencies held are reported in terms of U.S. dollars based on currency exchange rates readily available in active markets. These temporary cash investmentsU.S. dollars and foreign currencies are classified as Level 1 investments. Commercial paper assets are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. Commercial paper is classified as Level 2 investments.

61


Registered Investment Companies – Registered Investment Companies are entities primarily engaged in the business of investing in securities and are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Plan’s holdings of Registered Investment Companies include both public and private fund vehicles. The public vehicles are mutual funds (real estate) and exchange-traded funds (stocks), which are classified as Level 1 investments. The private vehicles (bonds) do not have published pricing and are valued using Net Asset Value (NAV).

Federal Government Securities – Federal Government Securities consist of bills, notes, bonds, and other fixed income securities issued directly by the U.S. Treasury or by government-sponsored enterprises. These assets are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. Federal Government Securities are classified as Level 2 investments.

64


Bonds and Debentures – Bonds and debentures consist of debt securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporations as well as state and local governments. These assets are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. Corporate, state, and municipal bonds and debentures are classified as Level 2 investments.

Corporate Stock – This investment category consists of common and preferred stock issued by U.S. and non-U.S. corporations. Most common shares are traded actively on exchanges and price quotes for these shares are readily available. Common stock is classified as a Level 1 investment. Preferred shares included in this category are valued using a bid evaluation process with bid data provided by independent pricing sources. Preferred stock is classified as a Level 2 investment.

Venture Capital and Buyout Partnerships – This investment category is comprised of interests in limited partnerships that invest primarily in privately-held companies. Due to the private nature of the partnership investments, pricing inputs are not readily observable. Asset valuations are developed by the general partners that manage the partnerships. These valuations are based on the application of public market multiples to private company cash flows, market transactions that provide valuation information for comparable companies, and other methods. The fair value recorded by the Plan is calculated using each partnership’s NAV.

Real Estate PartnershipsFunds – Most of the Plan’s real estate investments are primarily interests in private real estate investment trusts, partnerships, limited liability companies, and similar structures. Valuations for the holdings in this category are not based on readily observable inputs and are primarily derived from property appraisals. The fair value recorded by the Plan is calculated using the NAV for each investment.

Collective Trust and Other Funds – Collective trust and other funds are comprised of shares or units in commingled funds and limited liability companies that are not publicly traded. The underlying assets in these entities (U.S. stock funds, non-U.S. stock funds, commodity funds, hedge funds, and short term investment funds) are publicly traded on exchanges and price quotes for the assets held by these funds are readily available. The fair value recorded by the Plan is calculated using NAV for each investment.

62


As of December 31, 2017,2020, the pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

Quoted Prices

Significant

in Active

Other

Significant

Markets for

Observable

Unobservable

Identical Inputs

Inputs

Inputs

Millions

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Plan assets at fair value:

Temporary cash investments

$

$

-

$

-

$

Registered investment companies [a]

252 

-

-

252 

Federal government securities

-

150 

-

150 

Bonds and debentures

-

831 

-

831 

Corporate stock

2,209 

-

2,217 

Total plan assets at fair value

$

2,470 

$

989 

$

-

$

3,459 

Plan assets at NAV:

Registered investment companies [b]

312 

Venture capital and buyout partnerships

585 

Real estate funds

161 

Collective trust and other funds

498 

Total plan assets at NAV

$

1,556 

Other assets/(liabilities) [c]

Total plan assets

$

5,016 

[a]Registered investment companies measured at fair value are stock investments.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 



in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 



Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 



Identical Inputs

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Millions

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total

Plan assets at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Temporary cash investments

$

27 

 

$

 

 

$

 -

 

$

27 

     Registered investment companies [a]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

     Federal government securities

 

 

 

 

182 

 

 

 -

 

 

182 

     Bonds and debentures

 

 

 

 

389 

 

 

 -

 

 

389 

     Corporate stock

 

1,171 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,179 

Total plan assets at fair value

$

1,202 

 

$

579 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,781 

Plan assets at NAV:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Registered investment companies [b]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

329 

     Venture capital and buyout partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

358 

     Real estate partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

226 

     Collective trust and other funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,552 

Total plan assets at NAV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,465 

Other assets [c]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22)

Total plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,224 

[b]Registered investment companies measured at NAV include bond investments.

[c]Other assets include accrued receivables, net payables, and pending broker settlements.

[a]

Registered investment companies measured at fair value include stock investments.

[b]

Registered investment companies measured at NAV include bond investments.

65


[c]

Other assets include accrued receivables, net payables, and pending broker settlements.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

Significant

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

in Active

Other

Significant

Markets for

 

Observable

 

Unobservable

 

 

Markets for

Observable

Unobservable

Identical Inputs

 

Inputs

 

Inputs

 

 

 

Identical Inputs

Inputs

Inputs

Millions

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Plan assets at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Temporary cash investments

$

27 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

27 

$

$

$

-

$

Registered investment companies [a]

 

17 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

17 

-

-

Federal government securities

 

 -

 

 

142 

 

 

 -

 

 

142 

-

202 

-

202 

Bonds and debentures

 

 -

 

 

357 

 

 

 -

 

 

357 

-

575 

-

575 

Corporate stock

 

1,059 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,067 

1,932 

-

1,939 

Total plan assets at fair value

$

1,103 

 

$

507 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,610 

$

1,947 

$

785 

$

-

$

2,732 

Plan assets at NAV:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered investment companies [b]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

280 

285 

Venture capital and buyout partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

283 

531 

Real estate partnerships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

212 

Real estate funds

261 

Collective trust and other funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,346 

707 

Total plan assets at NAV

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,121 

$

1,784 

Other assets [c]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 

Other assets/(liabilities) [c]

12 

Total plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,748 

$

4,528 

[a]

Registered investment companies measured at fair value include stock and real estate investments.

[b]

Registered investment companies measured at NAV include bond investments.

[c]

Other assets include accrued receivables and pending broker settlements.

[a]Registered investment companies measured at fair value are stock investments.

[b]Registered investment companies measured at NAV include bond investments.

63


[c]Other assets include accrued receivables, net payables, and pending broker settlements.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no significant transfers in or out of Levels 1, 2, or 3.

The Master Trust’s investments in limited partnerships and similar structures (used to invest in private equity and real estate) are valued at fair value based on their proportionate share of the partnerships’ fair value as recorded in the limited partnerships’ audited financial statements. The limited partnerships allocate gains, losses, and expenses to the partners based on the ownership percentage as described in the partnership agreements. At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the Master Trust had future commitments for additional contributions to private equity partnerships totaling $359$147 million and $392$189 million, respectively, and to real estate partnerships and funds totaling $67$7 million and $32$8 million, respectively.

Other Retirement Programs

401(k)/Thrift Plan – For non-union employees hired prior to January 1, 2018, and eligible union employees for whom we make matching contributions, we provide a defined contribution plan (401(k)/thrift plan). We match 50 cents50% for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first 6% of compensation contributed. Our plan contributions were $19 million in 2017, $19  million in 2016, and $20 million in 2015.  For non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2018, we will match dollar-for-dollar,100% for each dollar, up to the first 6% of compensation contributed, in addition to contributing an annual amount of 3% of the employee’s annual base salary. Our plan contributions were $19 million in 2020, $20 million in 2019, and $18 million in 2018.

Railroad Retirement System – All Railroad employees are covered by the Railroad Retirement System (the System). Contributions made to the System are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $672$569 million in 2017, $6712020, $654 million in 2016,2019, and $749$710 million in 2015.2018.

Collective Bargaining Agreements – Under collective bargaining agreements, we participate in multi-employer benefit plans that provide certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees. Premiums paid under these plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $60$30 million in 2017,2020, $42 million in 2019, and $50 million in 2016, and $46 million in 2015. 2018. 

7.

66


6. Other Income

Other income included the following for the years ended December 31:

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Millions

2020

2019

2018

Rental income [a]

$

178 

$

96 

$

96 

Net gain on non-operating asset dispositions [b] [c]

 

111 

 

94 

 

144 

Rental income

Rental income

$

123 

$

124 

$

122 

Net gain on non-operating asset dispositions [a]

Net gain on non-operating asset dispositions [a]

115 

20 

30 

Net periodic pension and OPEB costs

Net periodic pension and OPEB costs

44 

37 

13 

Interest income

Interest income

 

16 

 

11 

 

Interest income

12 

32 

30 

Interest income on employment tax refund

Interest income on employment tax refund

-

31 

-

Early extinguishment of debt

Early extinguishment of debt

-

(2)

(85)

Non-operating environmental costs and other

Non-operating environmental costs and other

 

(15)

 

(9)

 

(19)

Non-operating environmental costs and other

(7)

(16)

Total

Total

$

290 

$

192 

$

226 

Total

$

287 

$

243 

$

94 

[a]

2017 includes $65 million related to a favorable litigation settlement.

[b]

2017 includes $26 million and $57 million related to a  real estate sale in the first quarter and in the third quarter, respectively.

[c]

2016 includes $17 million and $50 million related to a real estate sale in the first quarter and second quarter, respectively.

[a]2020 includes a $69 million gain from a land and permanent easement sale to the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority.

64


8.7. Income Taxes

Components of income tax expense were as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Current tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

1,750 

$

1,518 

$

1,901 

$

1,026 

$

1,000 

$

1,144 

State

 

235 

 

176 

 

210 

259 

254 

287 

Foreign

 

 

 

Total current tax expense

 

1,987 

 

1,702 

 

2,119 

1,291 

1,262 

1,436 

Deferred and other tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(5,260)

 

692 

 

644 

295 

417 

344 

State

 

183 

 

139 

 

121 

45 

128 

Foreign

 

10 

 

 -

 

 -

-

21 

(10)

Total deferred and other tax expense [a]

 

(5,067)

 

831 

 

765 

Total deferred and other tax expense

340 

566 

339 

Total income tax expense

$

(3,080)

$

2,533 

$

2,884 

$

1,631 

$

1,828 

$

1,775 

[a]

2017 includes  a $(5,935) million adjustment to income tax expense resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Of this amount, $(5,965) million is a federal income tax benefit and $30 million is a state income tax expense.

For the years ended December 31, reconciliations between statutory and effective tax rates are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Rate Percentages

2017 

 

2016 

 

2015 

 

2020

2019

2018

Federal statutory tax rate

35.0 

%

35.0 

%

35.0 

%

21.0 

%

21.0 

%

21.0 

%

State statutory rates, net of federal benefits

3.1 

 

3.1 

 

3.1 

 

3.7 

3.7 

3.9 

Adjustment for Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

(77.8)

 

 -

 

 -

 

Other deferred tax adjustments

0.4 

 

 -

 

 -

 

Tax credits

0.1 

 

(0.5)

 

(0.5)

 

Excess tax benefits from equity compensation plans

(0.8)

(0.7)

(0.4)

Dividends received deduction

(0.5)

(0.6)

(0.6)

Deferred tax adjustments

(0.1)

(0.1)

(0.6)

Other

(1.2)

 

(0.2)

 

0.1 

 

0.1 

0.3 

(0.4)

Effective tax rate

(40.4)

%

37.4 

%

37.7 

%

23.4 

%

23.6 

%

22.9 

%

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of events that are reported in different periods for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The majority of our deferred tax assets relate to deductions that already have been claimed for financial reporting purposes but not for tax purposes. The majority of our deferred tax liabilities relate to differences between the tax bases and financial reporting amounts of our land and depreciable property, due to accelerated tax depreciation (including bonus depreciation), revaluation of assets in purchase accounting transactions, and differences in capitalization methods.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) wasIn 2019, Arkansas enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act made significant changeslegislation to federal tax law, including a reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, 100% bonus depreciation for certain capital expenditures, stricter limits on deductions for interest and certain executive compensation, and a one-time transition tax on previously deferred earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. As a result of our initial analysis of the Tax Act and existing implementation guidance, we remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities and computed our transition tax liability net of offsetting foreign tax credits. This resulted in a $5.9 billion reduction in our income tax expense in 2017. We also recorded a $212 million reduction to our operating expense related to income tax adjustments at equity-method affiliates.

The SEC provided guidance in SAB 118 on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act (See Note 3). In accordance with that guidance, some of the income tax effects recorded in 2017 are provisional, including those related to our analysis of 100% bonus depreciation for certain capital expenditures, stricter limits on deductions for certain executive compensation, the one-time transition tax, and the reduction to our operating expense related to income tax adjustments at equity-method affiliates. The accounting for these income tax effects may be adjusted during 2018 as a result of continuing analysis of the Tax Act; additional implementation guidance from the IRS, state tax authorities, the SEC, the FASB, or the Joint Committee on Taxation; and new information from domestic or foreign equity affiliates.

65


On July 6, 2017, the State of Illinois increased itsreduce their corporate income tax rate effective July 1, 2017.  In the third quarterfor future years resulting in a $21 million reduction of 2017, we increased our deferred tax expense by $33expense.

In 2018, Iowa and Missouri enacted legislation to reduce their corporate tax rates for future years resulting in a $31 million to reflect the increasedreduction of our deferred tax rate.expense.

67


Deferred income tax (liabilities)/assets were comprised of the following at December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017[a]

2016 

2020

2019

Deferred income tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Property

$

(11,262)

$

(16,687)

$

(12,474)

$

(12,184)

Operating lease assets

(397)

(447)

Other

 

(197)

 

(346)

(444)

(341)

Total deferred income tax liabilities

 

(11,459)

 

(17,033)

(13,315)

(12,972)

Deferred income tax assets:

 

 

 

 

Accrued wages

 

46 

 

75 

40 

45 

Accrued casualty costs

 

147 

 

231 

143 

146 

Stock compensation

 

46 

 

69 

26 

37 

Retiree benefits

 

141 

 

222 

255 

171 

Credits

 

 

145 

Operating lease liabilities

396 

453 

Other

 

142 

 

295 

208 

128 

Total deferred income tax assets

$

523 

$

1,037 

1,068 

980 

Net deferred income tax liability

$

(10,936)

$

(15,996)

$

(12,247)

$

(11,992)

[a]

2017 amounts reflect the provisional impact of the Tax Act.

When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to reflect that these tax assets may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized based on management’s judgments using available evidence for purposes of estimating whether future taxable income will be sufficient to realize a deferred tax asset. In 20172020 and 2016,2019, there were no0 valuation allowances.

Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards.

A reconciliation of changes in unrecognized tax benefits liabilities/(assets) from the beginning to the end of the reporting period is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1

$

125 

$

94 

$

151 

$

64 

$

174 

$

179 

Increases for positions taken in current year

 

38 

 

31 

 

38 

18 

20 

30 

Increases for positions taken in prior years

 

51 

 

10 

 

13 

44 

Decreases for positions taken in prior years

 

(56)

 

(20)

 

(87)

(19)

(96)

(30)

Refunds from/(payments to) and settlements with taxing authorities

 

64 

 

 

(13)

-

(11)

21 

Increases/(decreases) for interest and penalties

 

 -

 

 

(5)

(5)

Lapse of statutes of limitations

 

(43)

 

 -

 

(3)

(1)

(62)

(39)

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31

$

179 

$

125 

$

94 

$

74 

$

64 

$

174 

We recognize interest and penalties as part of income tax expense. Total accrued liabilities for interest and penalties were $8 million and $3 million at both December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016.2019, respectively. Total interest and penalties recognized as part of income tax expense (benefit) were $(3) million for 2017, $5 million for 2020, ($4) million for 2019, and ($1) million for 2018.

In the second quarter of 2019, UPC signed final Revenue Agent Reports (RARs) from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the limited scope audits of UPC’s 2016 and $(3)2017 tax returns. As a result of the signed RARs, UPC paid the IRS $11 million for 2015.

in the third quarter of 2019, consisting of $10 million of tax and $1 million of interest. The statute of limitations has run for all years prior to 2014 and UPC is not currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for any of its open years.  2017.

In 2017, UPC amended its 2013 income tax returns,return, primarily to claim deductions resulting from the resolution of prior year IRS examinations. We have not received any communication from the IRS related to these amended returns.

66


In 2016, UPC amended its 2011 and 2012 income tax returns to claim deductions resulting from the resolution of IRS examinations for years prior to 2011. The IRS and Joint Committee on Taxation reviewed theseour 2013 amended returns.  Inreturn, and in the thirdsecond quarter of 2017,2018 we received a refund of $62 million, consisting of $60 million of tax and $2 million of interest.$19 million.

In the third quarter of 2015, UPC and the IRS signed a closing agreement resolving all tax matters for tax years 2009-2010. The settlement had an immaterial effect on our income tax expense. In connection with the settlement, UPC paid $10 million in the fourth quarter of 2015.68


Several state tax authorities are examining our state income tax returns for years 20102015 through 2015.2018.

We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly in the next 12 months.

The portion of our unrecognized tax benefits that relates to permanent changes in tax and interest would reduce our effective tax rate, if recognized. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions for which only the timing of the benefit is uncertain. Recognition of the tax benefits with uncertain timing would reduce our effective tax rate only through a reduction of accrued interest and penalties. The unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce our effective tax rate are as follows:

Millions

2020

2019

2018

Unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce the effective tax rate

$

52 

$

39 

$

63 

Unrecognized tax benefits that would not reduce the effective tax rate

22 

25 

111 

Total unrecognized tax benefits

$

74 

$

64 

$

174 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce the effective tax rate

$

83 

$

31 

$

31 

Unrecognized tax benefits that would not reduce the effective tax rate

 

96 

 

94 

 

63 

Total unrecognized tax benefits

$

179 

$

125 

$

94 

9.8. Earnings Per Share

The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Net income

$

10,712 

$

4,233 

$

4,772 

$

5,349 

$

5,919 

$

5,966 

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

798.4 

 

832.4 

 

866.2 

677.3 

703.5 

750.9 

Dilutive effect of stock options

 

1.8 

 

1.5 

 

1.5 

0.8 

1.2 

1.9 

Dilutive effect of retention shares and units

 

1.5 

 

1.5 

 

1.7 

1.0 

1.4 

1.5 

Diluted

 

801.7 

 

835.4 

 

869.4 

679.1 

706.1 

754.3 

Earnings per share – basic

$

13.42 

$

5.09 

$

5.51 

$

7.90 

$

8.41 

$

7.95 

Earnings per share – diluted

$

13.36 

$

5.07 

$

5.49 

$

7.88 

$

8.38 

$

7.91 

Common stock options totaling 1.60.3 million, 2.00.5 million, and 1.10.3 million for 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of these options exceeded the average market price of our common stock for the respective periods, and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

6769


10.9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)Loss

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)loss were as follows (net of tax):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

Defined
benefit
plans

Foreign currency translation

Total

Balance at January 1, 2017

$

(1,132)

$

(140)

$

(1,272)

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications

 

 

28 

 

30 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

 

101 

 

 -

 

101 

Net year-to-date other comprehensive income/(loss),
net of taxes of $(61) million

 

103 

 

28 

 

131 

Balance at December 31, 2017

$

(1,029)

$

(112)

$

(1,141)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2016

$

(1,103)

$

(92)

$

(1,195)

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications

 

(3)

 

(48)

 

(51)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

 

(26)

 

 -

 

(26)

Net year-to-date other comprehensive income/(loss),
net of taxes of $49 million

 

(29)

 

(48)

 

(77)

Balance at December 31, 2016

$

(1,132)

$

(140)

$

(1,272)

Millions

Defined 
benefit 
plans 

Foreign currency translation

Total

Balance at January 1, 2020

$

(1,150)

$

(206)

$

(1,356)

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications

(6)

(4)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

(233)

-

(233)

Net year-to-date other comprehensive income/(loss),
net of taxes of $75 million

(231)

(6)

(237)

Balance at December 31, 2020

$

(1,381)

$

(212)

$

(1,593)

Balance at January 1, 2019

$

(1,192)

$

(223)

$

(1,415)

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications

(86)

17 

(69)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) [a]

36 

-

36 

OPEB Plan amendment (Note 5)

92 

-

92 

Net year-to-date other comprehensive income/(loss),
net of taxes of ($15) million

42 

17 

59 

Balance at December 31, 2019

$

(1,150)

$

(206)

$

(1,356)

[a]

The accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) reclassification components are 1) prior service cost/(benefit) and 2) net actuarial loss which are both included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.  See Note 6 Retirement Plans for additional details.

11.[a] The accumulated other comprehensive income/loss reclassification components are 1) prior service cost/(credit) and 2) net actuarial loss which are both included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 5 Retirement Plans for additional details.

10. Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable includes freight and other receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is based upon historical losses, credit worthinesscreditworthiness of customers, and current economic conditions. At December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, our accounts receivable were reduced by $3$17 million and $5$4 million, respectively. Receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. At both December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, receivables classified as other assets were reduced by allowances of $17 million.$51 million and $35 million, respectively.

Receivables Securitization Facility – The Railroad maintains a $650an $800 million, 3-year receivables securitization facility (the Receivables Facility), maturing in July 2019.2022. Under the Receivables Facility, the Railroad sells most of its eligible third-party receivables to Union Pacific Receivables, Inc. (UPRI), a consolidated, wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary that may subsequently transfer, without recourse, an undivided interest in accounts receivable to investors. The investors have no recourse to the Railroad’s other assets except for customary warranty and indemnity claims. Creditors of the Railroad do not have recourse to the assets of UPRI.

The amount outstandingrecorded under the Receivables Facility was $500$0 and $400 million and $0 at December 31, 2017,2020 and December 31, 2016.2019, respectively. The Receivables Facility was supported by $1.1$1.2 billion and $1.0$1.3 billion of accounts receivable as collateral at December 31, 2017,2020 and December 31, 2016,2019, respectively, which, as a retained interest, is included in accounts receivable, net in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

The outstanding amount the Railroad is allowed to maintain under the Receivables Facility, with a maximum of $650$800 million, may fluctuate based on the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by business volumes and credit risks, including receivables payment quality measures such as default and dilution ratios. If default or dilution ratios increase one percent, the allowable outstanding amount under the Receivables Facility would not materially change.

70


The costs of the Receivables Facility include interest, which will vary based on prevailing benchmark and commercial paper rates, program fees paid to participating banks, commercial paper issuance costs, and fees of participating banks for unused commitment availability. The costs of the Receivables Facility are

68


included in interest expense and were $6 million, $7 million, $14 million, and $5$15 million for 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, respectively.

12.11. Properties

The following tables list the major categories of property and equipment as well as the weighted-average estimated useful life for each category (in years):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

 

Accumulated

Net Book

Estimated

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

Accumulated

Net Book

Estimated

As of December 31, 2017

Cost

Depreciation

Value

Useful Life

As of December 31, 2020

As of December 31, 2020

Cost

Depreciation

Value

Useful Life

Land

Land

$

5,258 

$

      N/A

$

5,258 

N/A

Land

$

5,246 

$

N/A

$

5,246 

N/A

Road:

Road:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Road:

Rail and other track material

Rail and other track material

 

16,327 

 

5,929 

 

10,398 43 

Rail and other track material

17,620 

6,631 

10,989 

42 

Ties

Ties

 

10,132 

 

2,881 

 

7,251 33 

Ties

11,051 

3,331 

7,720 

34 

Ballast

Ballast

 

5,406 

 

1,509 

 

3,897 34 

Ballast

5,926 

1,753 

4,173 

34 

Other roadway [a]

Other roadway [a]

 

18,972 

 

3,482 

 

15,490 47 

Other roadway [a]

21,030 

4,329 

16,701 

48 

Total road

Total road

 

50,837 

 

13,801 

 

37,036 

N/A

Total road

55,627 

16,044 

39,583 

N/A

Equipment:

Equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment:

Locomotives

Locomotives

 

9,686 

 

3,697 

 

5,989 19 

Locomotives

9,375 

3,555 

5,820 

17 

Freight cars

Freight cars

 

2,255 

 

983 

 

1,272 24 

Freight cars

2,118 

789 

1,329 

25 

Work equipment and other

Work equipment and other

 

936 

 

267 

 

669 19 

Work equipment and other

1,107 

351 

756 

18 

Total equipment

Total equipment

 

12,877 

 

4,947 

 

7,930 

N/A

Total equipment

12,600 

4,695 

7,905 

N/A

Technology and other

Technology and other

 

1,105 

 

460 

 

645 11 

Technology and other

1,199 

520 

679 

13 

Construction in progress

Construction in progress

 

736 

 

 -

 

736 

N/A

Construction in progress

748 

-

748 

N/A

Total

Total

$

70,813 

$

19,208 

$

51,605 

N/A

Total

$

75,420 

$

21,259 

$

54,161 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

 

Accumulated

Net Book

Estimated

Millions, Except Estimated Useful Life

Accumulated

Net Book

Estimated

As of December 31, 2016

Cost

Depreciation

Value

Useful Life

As of December 31, 2019

As of December 31, 2019

Cost

Depreciation

Value

Useful Life

Land

Land

$

5,220 

$

      N/A

$

5,220 

N/A

Land

$

5,276 

$

N/A

$

5,276 

N/A

Road:

Road:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Road:

Rail and other track material

Rail and other track material

 

15,845 

 

5,722 

 

10,123 40 

Rail and other track material

17,178 

6,381 

10,797 

42 

Ties

Ties

 

9,812 

 

2,736 

 

7,076 33 

Ties

10,693 

3,186 

7,507 

34 

Ballast

Ballast

 

5,242 

 

1,430 

 

3,812 34 

Ballast

5,752 

1,669 

4,083 

34 

Other roadway [a]

Other roadway [a]

 

18,138 

 

3,226 

 

14,912 47 

Other roadway [a]

20,331 

4,056 

16,275 

48 

Total road

Total road

 

49,037 

 

13,114 

 

35,923 

N/A

Total road

53,954 

15,292 

38,662 

N/A

Equipment:

Equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment:

Locomotives

Locomotives

 

9,692 

 

3,939 

 

5,753 20 

Locomotives

9,467 

3,434 

6,033 

18 

Freight cars

Freight cars

 

2,243 

 

972 

 

1,271 24 

Freight cars

2,083 

779 

1,304 

25 

Work equipment and other

Work equipment and other

 

905 

 

232 

 

673 19 

Work equipment and other

1,081 

322 

759 

18 

Total equipment

Total equipment

 

12,840 

 

5,143 

 

7,697 

N/A

Total equipment

12,631 

4,535 

8,096 

N/A

Technology and other

Technology and other

 

974 

 

412 

 

562 11 

Technology and other

1,136 

503 

633 

12 

Construction in progress

Construction in progress

 

987 

 

 -

 

987 

N/A

Construction in progress

1,249 

-

1,249 

N/A

Total

Total

$

69,058 

$

18,669 

$

50,389 

N/A

Total

$

74,246 

$

20,330 

$

53,916 

N/A

[a]

Other roadway includes grading, bridges and tunnels, signals, buildings, and other road assets.

[a]Other roadway includes grading, bridges and tunnels, signals, buildings, and other road assets.

Property and Depreciation – Our railroad operations are highly capital intensive, and our large base of homogeneous, network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis. Each year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers. Assets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria. Properties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service

71


lives, which are measured in years, except for rail in high-density traffic corridors (i.e., all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment, and yard and switching tracks, and electronic yards)tracks) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track. We use the group method of depreciation in which all

69


items with similar characteristics, use, and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates. The group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources, not as singular items. We currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes, and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology, asset strategies, or other factors.

We determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad assets by means of depreciation studies. We perform depreciation studies at least every three3 years for equipment and every six6 years for track assets (i.e., rail and other track material, ties, and ballast) and other road property. Our depreciation studies take into account the following factors:

·

Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;

·

Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets;

·

Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and

·

Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.

Statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes;

Evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets;

Evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices; and

Expected salvage to be received upon retirement.

For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track. It has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage (i.e., the amount of weight carried over the rail). The service lives also vary based on rail weight, rail condition (e.g., new or secondhand), and rail type (e.g., straight or curve). Our depreciation studies for rail in high-density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives. For rail in high-density traffic corridors, we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail (i.e., the weight of loaded and empty freight cars, locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile. For all other depreciable assets, we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives of our assets as determined from the analysis of our depreciation studies. Changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively.

Under group depreciation, the historical cost (net of salvage) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. The historical cost of certain track assets is estimated by multiplying the current replacement cost of track assets by a historical index factor derived from (i) inflation indices published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and (ii) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies. The indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes. Because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired, we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate. In addition, we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient (or in excess) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies. Any deficiency (or excess) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets.

For retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business, a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions: (i) is unusual, (ii) is material in amount, and (iii) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies. A gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations.

We review construction in progress assets that have not yet been placed into service, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or assets may not be recoverable. If impairment indicators are present and the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of construction in progress assets when grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value.

72


When we purchase an asset, we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use. However, many of our assets are self-constructed. A large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties, which is typically performed by our employees, and for track line expansion and other capacity projects. Costs that are directly attributable to capital projects (including overhead costs) are capitalized. Direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material, labor, and work equipment. Indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset.

Normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while costsCosts incurred that extend the useful life of an asset, improve the safety of our operations, or improve operating efficiency are capitalized.capitalized, while normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. These

70


costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases. Total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $2.5$2.0 billion for 2017,2020, $2.3 billion for 2016,2019, and $2.5 billion for 2015.2018.

Assets held under capitalfinance leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. Amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease.

13.Brazos Yard Impairment – In the fourth quarter of 2020, we made the strategic decision that our Brazos yard investments made to date will be used for freight car block swapping activities, rather than proceeding with additional investments required to complete the freight car classification yard. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $278 million, recognized in other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The Brazos yard investment was recorded as construction in progress as it had not yet been placed into service. We estimated the fair value of the remaining Brazos investments not used for freight car block swapping activities based on market values of similar assets, which are Level 2 inputs.

12. Accounts Payable and Other Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Millions

2017 2016 

2020

2019

Income and other taxes payable

$

635 

$

496 

Accounts payable

$

1,013 

$

955 

612 

749 

Income and other taxes payable

 

547 

 

472 

Accrued wages and vacation

 

384 

 

387 

340 

370 

Interest payable

 

220 

 

212 

326 

289 

Current operating lease liabilities (Note 16)

321 

362 

Accrued casualty costs

 

194 

 

185 

177 

190 

Equipment rents payable

 

110 

 

101 

101 

100 

Other

 

671 

 

570 

592 

538 

Total accounts payable and other current liabilities

$

3,139 

$

2,882 

$

3,104 

$

3,094 

14.13. Financial Instruments

Short-Term InvestmentsTheAll of the Company’s short-term investments consist of time deposits and government agency securities. These investments are considered levelLevel 2 investments and are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value ($90 million of time deposits asvalue. As of December 31, 2017).2020, the Company had $70 million of short-term investments, of which $10 million are in a trust for the purpose of providing collateral for payment of certain other long-term liabilities, and as such are reclassified as other assets. All short-term investments have a maturity of less than one year and are classified as held-to-maturity. There were no0 transfers out of Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using a market value price model, which utilizes applicable U.S. Treasury rates along with current market quotes on comparable debt securities. All of the inputs used to determine the fair market value of the Corporation’s long-term debt are Level 2 inputs and obtained from an independent source. At December 31, 2017,2020, the fair value of total debt was $18.2$31.9 billion, approximately $1.3$5.1 billion more than the carrying value. At December 31, 2016,2019, the fair value of total debt was $15.9$27.2 billion, approximately $0.9$2.0 billion more than the carrying value. The fair value of the Corporation’s debt is a measure of its current value under present market conditions. It does not impact the financial statements under current accounting rules. At both December 31, 2017, and 2016, approximately $155 million of debt securities contained call provisions that allow us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity at par, without the payment of fixed call premiums.  The fair value of our cash equivalents approximates their carrying value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

7173


15.

14. Debt

Total debt as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, is summarized below:



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 

Notes and debentures, 1.8% to 7.9% due through 2067

$

15,096 

$

13,547 

Capitalized leases, 3.1% to 8.4% due through 2028

 

892 

 

1,105 

Equipment obligations, 2.6% to 6.7% due through 2031

 

1,018 

 

1,069 

Term loans - floating rate, due in 2018

 

250 

 

100 

Mortgage bonds, 4.8% due through 2030

 

57 

 

57 

Medium-term notes, 9.3% to 10.0% due through 2020

 

18 

 

23 

Receivables Securitization (Note 11)

 

500 

 

 -

Unamortized discount and deferred issuance costs

 

(887)

 

(894)

Total debt

 

16,944 

 

15,007 

Less: current portion

 

(800)

 

(758)

Total long-term debt

$

16,144 

$

14,249 

Millions

2020 

2019

Notes and debentures, 2.2% to 7.1% due through February 5, 2070

$

26,608 

$

24,008 

Equipment obligations, 2.6% to 6.2% due through January 2, 2031

885 

923 

Finance leases, 3.1% to 8.0% due through December 10, 2028

449 

605 

Term loans - floating rate, due October 28, 2021

250 

250 

Commercial paper, 0.2% to 0.3% due through January 21, 2021

75 

200 

Receivables securitization (Note 10)

-

400 

Medium-term notes

-

Unamortized discount and deferred issuance costs

(1,538)

(1,194)

Total debt

26,729 

25,200 

Less: current portion

(1,069)

(1,257)

Total long-term debt

$

25,660 

$

23,943 

Debt Maturities – The following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of December 31, 2017,2020, excluding market value adjustments:

 

 

 

 

Millions

 

 

2018

$

806 

2019

 

1,125 

2020

 

1,021 

2021

 

677 

$

1,072 

2022

 

917 

1,384 

2023

1,384 

2024

1,439 

2025

1,429 

Thereafter

 

13,285 

21,559 

Total principal

 

17,831 

28,267 

Unamortized discount and deferred issuance costs

 

(887)

(1,538)

Total debt

$

16,944 

$

26,729 

Equipment Encumbrances – Equipment with a carrying value of approximately $2.0$1.3 billion and $2.3$1.6 billion at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, served as collateral for capitalfinance leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire or refinance such railroad equipment.

AsDebt Redemptions –On November 1, 2020, we redeemed all $500 million of outstanding 4.0% notes due February 1, 2021, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Effective October 15, 2019, we redeemed all $163 million of our outstanding 6.125% notes due February 15, 2020. The redemption resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $2 million in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Debt Exchange -On September 16, 2020, we exchanged $1,047 million of various outstanding notes and debentures due between May 1, 2037, and March 1, 2049 (the Existing Notes), for $1,047 million of 2.973% notes (the New Notes) due September 16, 2062, plus cash consideration of approximately $319 million in addition to $4 million for accrued and unpaid interest on the Existing Notes. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments-Derecognition, this transaction was accounted for as a debt exchange, as the exchanged debt instruments are not considered to be substantially different. The cash consideration was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of debt, and the balance of the unamortized discount and issue costs from the Existing Notes is being amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the terms of the New Notes. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the merger of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MPRR) with and into UPRR on January 1, 1997, and pursuantexchange. Costs related to the underlying indenturesdebt exchange that were payable to parties other than the debt holders totaled approximately $9 million and were included in interest expense during the quarter ended September 30, 2020.

74


On November 20, 2019, we exchanged $1,839 million of various outstanding notes and debentures due between June 1, 2033, and September 10, 2058 (the Existing Notes), for $1,842 million of 3.839% notes (the New Notes) due March 20, 2060, plus cash consideration of approximately $373 million in addition to $19 million for accrued and unpaid interest on the MPRR mortgage bonds, UPRR must maintainExisting Notes. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40, Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments-Derecognition, this transaction was accounted for as a debt exchange, as the sameexchanged debt instruments are not considered to be substantially different. The cash consideration was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of assets afterdebt, and the merger in order to comply with the security requirementsbalance of the mortgage bonds. Asunamortized discount and issue costs from the Existing Notes is being amortized as an adjustment of the merger date, the value of the MPRR assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $6.0 billion. In accordance withinterest expense over the terms of the indentures, this collateral value must be maintained during the entire termNew Notes. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the mortgage bonds irrespectiveexchange. Costs related to the debt exchange that were payable to parties other than the debt holders totaled approximately $15 million and were included in interest expense in the fourth quarter of the outstanding balance of such bonds.2019.

Credit Facilities – At December 31, 2017,2020, we had $1.7$2.0 billion of credit available under our revolving credit facility, which is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper. We did not draw on theCredit facility withdrawals totaled $0 during 2017.2020. Commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilityFacility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated, investment-grade borrowers. The facilityFacility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on London Interbank Offered Rates,LIBOR, plus a spread, depending upon credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt. The 5 year facility matures in May 2019 under a five-year term and requires UPC to maintain a debt-to-net-worthdebt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) coverage ratio.

The definition of debt used for purposes of calculating the debt-to-net-worthdebt-to-EBITDA coverage ratio includes, among other things, certain credit arrangements, capitalfinance leases, guarantees, and unfunded and vested pension benefits under Title IV of ERISA.ERISA, and unamortized debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs. At December 31, 2017,2020, the debt-to-net-worthCompany was in compliance with the debt-to-EBITDA coverage ratio, allowedwhich allows us to carry up to $49.7$36.8 billion of debt (as defined in the facility)Facility), and we had $17.0$28.3 billion of debt (as defined in the facility)Facility) outstanding at that date. Under our current financial plans, we expect to continue to satisfy the

72


debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio; however, many factors beyond our reasonable control could affect our ability to comply with this provision in the future. The facilityFacility does not include any other financial restrictions, credit rating triggers (other than rating-dependent pricing), or any other provision that could require us to post collateral. The facilityFacility also includes a $125$150 million cross-default provision and a change-of-control provision.

During 2017,2020, we did not issue or repay anyissued $2.3 billion and repaid $2.5 billion of commercial paper and atwith maturities ranging from 14 to 74 days. As of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, we had no$75 million and $200 million of commercial paper outstanding.outstanding, respectively. Our revolving credit facility supports our outstanding commercial paper balances, and, unless we change the terms of our commercial paper program, our aggregate issuance of commercial paper will not exceed the amount of borrowings available under the facility.Facility.

Dividend Restrictions – OurIn May 2020, we entered into three bilateral revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant (discussed inlines which mature by May 18, 2021, totaling

$600 million of available credit. Since entering into the Credit Facilities section above) that, under certain circumstances, restricts the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders. The amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $16.4 billionthree bilateral revolving credit lines, we drew $300 million and $12.4 billionrepaid $300 million, and at December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively.2020, we had $0 outstanding.

Shelf Registration Statement and Significant New Borrowings – In 2016, the2019, our Board of Directors reauthorized the issuance of up to $4.0$6 billion of debt securities. Under our shelf registration, we may issue, from time to time any combination of debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings.

During 2017,2020, we issued the following unsecured, fixed-rate debt securities under our current shelf registration:

Date

Description of Securities

April 5, 2017January 31, 2020

$500 million of 3.000%2.150% Notes due April 15,February 5, 2027

$500750 million of 4.000%2.400% Notes due April 15, 2047February 5, 2030

September 19, 2017

$500 million1.0 billion of 3.600%3.250% Notes due September 15, 2037February 5, 2050

$500750 million of 4.100%3.750% Notes due September 15, 2067February 5, 2070

April 7, 2020

$750 million of 3.250% Notes due February 5, 2050

We used the net proceeds from the offerings for general corporate purposes, including the repurchase of common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program.programs. These debt securities include change-of-control provisions. At December 31, 2017,2020, we had remaining authority to issue up to $1.55$2.25 billion of debt securities under our shelf registration.

75


Receivables Securitization Facility – As ofDecember 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, we recorded $500$0 and $400 million, and $0, respectively, of borrowings under our Receivables Facility, as secured debt. (See further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in Note 11)10).

16.LIBOR Transition – Each of our $2.0 billion revolving credit facility, three bilateral revolving credit lines, two term loans, and Receivables Securitization Facility currently use LIBOR as the benchmark for its floating interest rates. Authorities that regulate LIBOR have announced plans to phase out LIBOR so that it will, at some point, cease to exist as a benchmark for floating interest rates. To address the phase out of LIBOR, the agreements for substantially all of these facilities include a mechanism to replace LIBOR with an alternative rate or benchmark under specified circumstances through an amendment to the agreements. As part of this process, we will need to renegotiate our agreements to reference that alternative rate or benchmark, and may need to modify our existing benchmark replacement language, or obtain replacement facilities.

15. Variable Interest Entities

We have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities (VIEs). These VIEs were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions (principally involving railroad equipment and facilities) and have no other activities, assets, or liabilities outside of the lease transactions. Within these lease arrangements, we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices. Depending on market conditions, fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us; however, these benefits are not expected to be significant.

We maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements, which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry. As such, we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets. We do not hold the power to direct the activities of the VIEs and, therefore, do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the VIEs. Additionally, we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the VIEs or the right to receive benefits of the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs.

We are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these VIEs because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the VIE’s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the VIEs. The future minimum lease payments associated with the VIE leases totaled $1.9$1.3 billion as of December 31, 2017.2020, and are recorded as operating lease liabilities at present value in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

16. Leases

73


17. Leases

We lease certain locomotives, freight cars, and other property. Theproperty for use in our rail operations. We determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components and we have elected to not separate lease and non-lease components for all classes of underlying assets. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2017, and 2016 included $1,635 million, net of $953 million of accumulated depreciation, and $1,997 million, net of $1,121 million of accumulated depreciation, respectively, for properties held under capital leases. A charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Future minimumPosition; we recognize lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2017, were as follows:



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Millions

Operating
Leases

Capital
Leases

2018

$

398 

$

173 

2019

 

359 

 

156 

2020

 

297 

 

164 

2021

 

259 

 

168 

2022

 

221 

 

147 

Later years

 

1,115 

 

271 

Total minimum lease payments

$

2,649 

$

1,079 

Amount representing interest

 

N/A

 

(187)

Present value of minimum lease payments

 

N/A

$

892 

Approximately 97% of capital lease payments relate to locomotives. Rent expense for operatingthese leases with terms exceeding one month was $480 million in 2017, $535 million in 2016, and $590 million in 2015. When cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis, we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Contingent rentalsLeases with initial terms in excess of 12 months are recorded as operating or financing leases in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Operating leases are included in operating lease assets, accounts payable and sub-rentalsother current liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Finance leases are included in net properties, debt due within one year, and debt due after one year on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

Operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most of our leases do not significant.provide an implicit rate, we use a collateralized incremental borrowing rate for all operating leases based on the information available at commencement date, including lease term, in determining the present value of future payments. The operating lease asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and reported in equipment and other rents, and financing lease expense is recorded as depreciation and interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

18.

76


The following are additional details related to our lease portfolio:

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Millions

Classification

2020

2019

Assets

Operating leases

Operating lease assets

$

1,610 

$

1,812 

Finance leases

Net properties [a]

370 

468 

Total leased assets

$

1,980 

$

2,280 

Liabilities

Current

Operating

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

$

321 

$

362 

Finance

Debt due within one year

109 

114 

Noncurrent

Operating

Operating lease liabilities

1,283 

1,471 

Finance

Debt due after one year

340 

491 

Total lease liabilities

$

2,053 

$

2,438 

[a] Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $737million and $797 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The lease cost components are classified as follows:

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Millions

Classification

2020

2019

Operating lease cost [a]

Equipment and other rents

$

247 

$

305 

Operating lease cost [a]

Purchased services and materials

40 

40 

Operating lease cost [a]

Capitalized in net properties

30 

21 

Finance lease cost

Amortization of leased assets

Depreciation

66 

72 

Interest on lease liabilities

Interest expense

27 

34 

Net lease cost

$

410 

$

472 

[a] In addition to the lease cost components referenced above, we had short-term lease costs of $26 million and $27 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and variable lease costs of $10 million and $12 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The following table presents aggregate lease maturities as of December 31, 2020:

Millions

Operating Leases

Finance Leases

Total

2021

$

325 

$

135 

$

460 

2022

273 

111 

384 

2023

229 

81 

310 

2024

220 

68 

288 

2025

216 

45 

261 

After 2025

567 

77 

644 

Total lease payments

$

1,830 

$

517 

$

2,347 

Less: Interest

226 

68 

294 

Present value of lease liabilities

$

1,604 

$

449 

$

2,053 

77


The following table presents the weighted average remaining lease term and discount rate:

Dec. 31,

2020

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)

Operating leases

7.9 

Finance leases

5.2 

Weighted-average discount rate (%)

Operating leases

3.7 

Finance leases

5.1 

The following table presents other information related to our operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31:

Millions

2020

2019

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

Operating cash flows from operating leases

$

323 

$

387 

Investing cash flows from operating leases

30 

21 

Operating cash flows from finance leases

29 

35 

Financing cash flows from finance leases

113 

112 

Leased assets obtained in exchange for finance lease liabilities

-

-

Leased assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities

93 

118 

17. Commitments and Contingencies

Asserted and Unasserted Claims – Various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries. We cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. To the extent possible, we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated. We do not expect that any known lawsuits, claims, environmental costs, commitments, contingent liabilities, or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters.

Personal Injury – The cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year. We use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability, including unasserted claims. The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) governs compensation for work-related accidents. Under FELA, damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements. We offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work.

Our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 95%94% of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 5%6% is related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2017.2020. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $285$270 million to $310$295 million. We record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other. Estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation.

7478


Our personal injury liability activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Beginning balance

$

290 

$

318 

$

335 

$

265 

$

271 

$

285 

Current year accruals

 

77 

 

75 

 

89 

72 

78 

74 

Changes in estimates for prior years

 

(7)

 

(29)

 

(3)

(3)

(11)

(16)

Payments

 

(75)

 

(74)

 

(103)

(64)

(73)

(72)

Ending balance at December 31

$

285 

$

290 

$

318 

$

270 

$

265 

$

271 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

66 

$

62 

$

63 

$

60 

$

63 

$

72 

In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2017, we also reassessedWe reassess our estimated insurance recoveries. Werecoveries annually and have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016. 2019. Any changes to recorded insurance recoveries are included in the above table in the Changes in estimates for prior years category.

Asbestos – We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits in which current and former employees and other parties allege exposure to asbestos. We assess our potential liability using a statistical analysis of resolution costs for asbestos-related claims.  This liability is updated annually and excludes future defense and processing costs. The liability for resolving both asserted and unasserted claims was based on the following assumptions:

·

The ratio of future claims by alleged disease would be consistent with historical averages adjusted for inflation.

·

The number of claims filed against us will decline each year.

·

The average settlement values for asserted and unasserted claims will be equivalent to historical averages.

·

The percentage of claims dismissed in the future will be equivalent to historical averages.

Our liability for asbestos-related claims is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments. Approximately 16% of the recorded liability related to asserted claims and approximately 84% related to unasserted claims at December 31, 2017.  Because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims, it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $99 million to $105 million.  We record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other.

Our asbestos-related liability activity was as follows:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

Beginning balance

$

111 

$

120 

$

126 

Accruals/(Credits)

 

(1)

 

12 

 

 -

Payments

 

(11)

 

(21)

 

(6)

Ending balance at December 31

$

99 

$

111 

$

120 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

$

$

In conjunction with the liability update performed in 2017, we also reassessed our estimated insurance recoveries. We have recognized an asset for estimated insurance recoveries at December 31, 2017, and 2016.  The amounts recorded for asbestos-related liabilities and related insurance recoveries were based on currently known facts. However, future events, such as the number of new claims filed each year, average settlement costs, and insurance coverage issues, could cause the actual costs and insurance recoveries to be higher or lower than the projected amounts. Estimates also may vary in the future if strategies, activities, and outcomes of asbestos litigation materially change; federal and state laws governing asbestos litigation increase or decrease the probability or amount of compensation of claimants; and there are material changes with respect to payments made to claimants by other defendants.

Environmental Costs – We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. We have identified 315373 sites at which we are or may be liable for remediation costs associated with alleged contamination or for violations of environmental requirements. This includes 3329 sites that are the subject of actions taken by the U.S. government, 2118 of which are currently on the Superfund National Priorities List.

75


Certain federal legislation imposes joint and several liability for the remediation of identified sites; consequently, our ultimate environmental liability may include costs relating to activities of other parties, in addition to costs relating to our own activities at each site.

When we identify an environmental issue with respect to property owned, leased, or otherwise used in our business, we perform, with assistance of our consultants, environmental assessments on the property. We expense the cost of the assessments as incurred. We accrue the cost of remediation where our obligation is probable and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Our environmental liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments.

Our environmental liability activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions

2017 2016 2015 

2020

2019

2018

Beginning balance

$

212 

$

190 

$

182 

$

227 

$

223 

$

196 

Accruals

 

45 

 

84 

 

61 

76 

67 

84 

Payments

 

(61)

 

(62)

 

(53)

(70)

(63)

(57)

Ending balance at December 31

$

196 

$

212 

$

190 

$

233 

$

227 

$

223 

Current portion, ending balance at December 31

$

57 

$

55 

$

52 

$

65 

$

62 

$

59 

The environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites, as well as ongoing monitoring costs, but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties. Cost estimates are based on information available for each site, financial viability of other potentially responsible parties, and existing technology, laws, and regulations. The ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties, site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties, the degree of contamination by various wastes, the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites, and the speculative nature of remediation costs. Estimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal, state, and local laws governing environmental remediation. Current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

Insurance – The Company has a consolidated, wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiary (the captive), that provides insurance coverage for certain risks including FELA claims and property coverage whichthat are subject to reinsurance. The captive entered into annual reinsurance treaty agreements that insure workers compensation, general liability, auto liability, and FELA risk. The captive cedes a portion of its FELA exposure through the treaty and assumes a proportionate share of the entire risk. The captive receives direct premiums, which are netted against the Company’s premium costs in other expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The treaty agreements provide for certain protections against the risk of treaty participants’ non-performance, and we do not believe our exposure to treaty participants’ non-performance is material at this time. In the event the Company leaves the reinsurance program, the Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholders for activity prior to the termination of the treaty agreements. We record both liabilities and reinsurance receivables using an actuarial analysis based on historical experience in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

79


Effective January 2019, the captive insurance subsidiary no longer participates in the reinsurance treaty agreement. The Company established a trust in the fourth quarter of 2018 for the purpose of providing collateral as required under the reinsurance treaty agreement for prior years’ participation.

Guarantees – At December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, we were contingently liable for $33$10 million and $43$15 million, respectively, in guarantees, respectively.guarantees. The fair value of these obligations as of both December 31, 2017,2020 and 20162019 was $0. We entered into these contingent guarantees in the normal course of business, and they include guaranteed obligations related to our affiliated operations. The final guarantee expires in 2022. We are not aware of any existing event of default that would require us to satisfy these guarantees. We do not expect that these guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Indemnities – We are contingently obligated under a variety of indemnification arrangements, although in some cases the extent of our potential liability is limited, depending on the nature of the transactions and the agreements. Due to uncertainty as to whether claims will be made or how they will be resolved, we cannot reasonably determine the probability of an adverse claim or reasonably estimate any adverse liability or the total maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements. We do not have any reason to believe that we will be required to make any material payments under these indemnity provisions. 

76


19.18. Share Repurchase ProgramPrograms

Effective JanuaryApril 1, 2017,2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120150 million shares of our common stock by DecemberMarch 31, 2020,2022, replacing our previous repurchase program. These repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions. Our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we repurchased a total of $23.2$40.9 billion of our common stock since the commencement of our repurchase programs in 2007. The table below represents shares repurchased in 2017 under this repurchase programs during 2019 and 2020:

Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid [a]

2020

2019

2020

2019

First quarter [b]

14,305,793 

18,149,450 

$

178.66 

$

165.79 

Second quarter

-

3,732,974 

-

171.24 

Third quarter [c]

4,045,575 

9,529,733 

98.87 

163.30 

Fourth quarter

3,780,743 

3,582,212 

198.07 

167.32 

Total

22,132,111 

34,994,369 

$

167.39 

$

165.85 

Remaining number of shares that may be repurchased under current authority

111,022,970 

[a]In the period of the final settlement, the average price paid under the accelerated share repurchase programs is calculated based

on the total program value less the value assigned to the initial delivery of shares. The average price of the completed 2020 and

2019 accelerated share repurchase programs was $155.86 and $167.01, respectively.

[b]Includes 8,786,380 and 11,795,930 shares repurchased in 2016February 2020 and 2019, respectively, under our previousaccelerated share repurchase program.programs.

[c]Includes an incremental 4,045,575 and 3,172,900 shares received upon final settlement in July 2020 and August 2019, respectively, under accelerated share repurchase programs.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid



2017 2016 

 

2017 

 

2016 

First quarter

7,531,300 9,315,807 

$

106.55 

$

76.49 

Second quarter

7,788,283 7,026,100 

 

109.10 

 

85.66 

Third quarter

11,801,755 9,088,613 

 

106.69 

 

93.63 

Fourth quarter

9,231,510 9,624,667 

 

119.37 

 

97.60 

Total

36,352,848 35,055,187 

$

110.40 

$

88.57 

Management's assessments of market conditions and other pertinent factors guide the timing and volume of all repurchases. Repurchased sharesWe expect to fund any share repurchases under this program through cash generated from operations, the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties, debt issuances, and cash on hand. Open market repurchases are recorded in treasury stock at cost, which includes any applicable commissions and fees.

From January 1, 2018,2021, through February 8, 2018,4, 2021, we repurchased 2.62.1 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $349$442 million.

20.Accelerated Share Repurchase Programs – The Company has established accelerated share repurchase programs (ASRs) with financial institutions to repurchase shares of our common stock. These ASRs have been structured so that at the time of commencement, we pay a specified amount to the financial institutions and receive an initial delivery of shares. Additional shares may be received at the time of settlement. The final number of shares to be received is based on the volume weighted average price of

80


the Company’s common stock during the ASR term, less a discount and subject to potential adjustments pursuant to the terms of such ASR.

On February 19, 2020, the Company received 8,786,380 shares of its common stock repurchased under ASRs for an aggregate of $2.0 billion. Upon settlement of these ASRs in the third quarter of 2020, we received 4,045,575 additional shares.

On February 26, 2019, the Company received 11,795,930 shares of its common stock repurchased under ASRs for an aggregate of $2.5 billion. Upon settlement of these ASRs in the third quarter of 2019, we received 3,172,900 additional shares.

ASRs are accounted for as equity transactions, and at the time of receipt, shares are included in treasury stock at fair market value as of the corresponding initiation or settlement date. The Company reflects shares received as a repurchase of common stock in the weighted average common shares outstanding calculation for basic and diluted earnings per share.

19. Related Parties

UPRR and other North American railroad companies jointly own TTX Company (TTX). UPRR has a 36.79% economic and voting interest in TTX while the other North American railroads own the remaining interest. In accordance with ASC 323 Investments - Equity Method and Joint Venture, UPRR applies the equity method of accounting to our investment in TTX.

TTX is a railcarrail car pooling company that owns railcarsrail cars and intermodal wells to serve North America’s railroads. TTX assists railroads in meeting the needs of their customers by providing railcarsrail cars in an efficient, pooled environment. All railroads have the ability to utilize TTX railcarsrail cars through car hire by renting railcarsrail cars at stated rates.

UPRR had $1.2$1.5 billion and $877 million$1.4 billion recognized as investments related to TTX in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.TTX car hire expenses of $388$375 million in 2017, $3682020, $407 million in 2016,2019, and $376$429 million in 20152018 are included in equipment and other rents in our Consolidated Statements of Income. In addition, UPRR had accounts payable to TTX of $69$59 million and $61$62 million at December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

77


21.20. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

Mar. 31

Jun. 30

Sep. 30

Dec. 31

2020

Mar. 31

Jun. 30

Sep. 30

Dec. 31

Operating revenues

$

5,132 

$

5,250 

$

5,408 

$

5,450 

$

5,229 

$

4,244 

$

4,919 

$

5,141 

Operating income

 

1,793 

 

2,005 

 

2,012 

 

2,251 

2,143 

1,654 

2,031 

2,006 

Net income

 

1,072 

 

1,168 

 

1,194 

 

7,278 

1,474 

1,132 

1,363 

1,380 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

1.32 

 

1.45 

 

1.50 

 

9.29 

2.15 

1.67 

2.02 

2.05 

Diluted

 

1.32 

 

1.45 

 

1.50 

 

9.25 

2.15 

1.67 

2.01 

2.05 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, Except Per Share Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

Mar. 31

Jun. 30

Sep. 30

Dec. 31

2019

Mar. 31

Jun. 30

Sep. 30

Dec. 31

Operating revenues

$

4,829 

$

4,770 

$

5,174 

$

5,168 

$

5,384 

$

5,596 

$

5,516 

$

5,212 

Operating income

 

1,687 

 

1,660 

 

1,960 

 

1,965 

1,960 

2,260 

2,234 

2,100 

Net income

 

979 

 

979 

 

1,131 

 

1,144 

1,391 

1,570 

1,555 

1,403 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

1.16 

 

1.17 

 

1.36 

 

1.40 

1.94 

2.23 

2.22 

2.03 

Diluted

 

1.16 

 

1.17 

 

1.36 

 

1.39 

1.93 

2.22 

2.22 

2.02 

Per share net income for the four quarters combined may not equal the per share net income for the year due to rounding.


7881


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there were no changes to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.


7982


MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the Corporation) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). The Corporation’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

The Corporation’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2020. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on the next page.

February 8, 20184, 2021


8083


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Union Pacific Corporation

Omaha, Nebraska

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies (the "Corporation") as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of financial positionand for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Corporation as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in common shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Table of Contents at Part IV, Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”) and our report dated February 9, 20185, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Omaha, Nebraska

February 9, 20185, 2021

8184


Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

(a)

Directors of Registrant.

(a)Directors of Registrant.

Information as to the names, ages, positions, and offices with UPC, terms of office, periods of service, business experience during the past five years, and certain other directorships held by each director or person nominated to become a director of UPC is set forth in the Election of Directors segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning our Audit Committee and the independence of its members, along with information about the audit committee financial expert(s) serving on the Audit Committee, is set forth in the Audit Committee segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

(b)

Executive Officers of Registrant.

(b)Executive Officers of Registrant.

Information concerning the executive officers of UPC and its subsidiaries is presented in Part I of this report under Information About Our Executive Officers of the Registrant and Principal Executive Officers of Our Subsidiaries.

(c)

Section 16(a) Compliance.

(c)Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports.

Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth in the Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

(d)

Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers of Registrant.

(d)Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers of Registrant.

The Board of Directors of UPC has adopted the UPC Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (the Code). A copy of the Code may be found on the Internet at our website www.up.com/investor/governance. We intend to disclose any amendments to the Code or any waiver from a provision of the Code on our website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information concerning compensation received by our directors and our named executive officers is presented in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2017,2020, Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172020 Fiscal Year-End, Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2017,2020, Pension Benefits at 20172020 Fiscal Year-End, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation at 20172020 Fiscal Year-End, Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control and Director Compensation in Fiscal Year 20172020 segments of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Additional information regarding compensation of directors, including Board committee members, is set forth in the By-Laws of UPC and the Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors, both of which are included as exhibits to this report. Information regarding the Compensation and Benefits Committee is set forth in the Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Compensation Committee Report segments of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information as to the number of shares of our equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors and nominees for director, our named executive officers, our directors and executive officers as a group, and certain beneficial owners is set forth in the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

8285


The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which UPC common stock may be issued as of December 31, 2017:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



(a)

(b)

(c)

Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved
   by security holders

7,345,104 

[1]

$

83.35 

[2]

72,151,415 

Total

7,345,104 

 

$

83.35 

 

72,151,415 

[1]

Includes 1,715,240 retention units that do not have an exercise price. Does not include 1,780,322 retention shares that have been issued and are outstanding.

[2]

Does not include the retention units or retention shares described above in footnote 1.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information on related transactions is set forth in the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation segments of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. We do not have any relationship with any outside third party that would enable such a party to negotiate terms of a material transaction that may not be available to, or available from, other parties on an arm’s-length basis.

Information regarding the independence of our directors is set forth in the Director Independence segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning the fees billed by our independent registered public accounting firm and the nature of services comprising the fees for each of the two most recent fiscal years in each of the following categories: (i) audit fees, (ii) audit-related fees, (iii) tax fees, and (iv) all other fees, is set forth in the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees and Services segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning our Audit Committee’s policies and procedures pertaining to pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm is set forth in the Audit Committee segment of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


8386


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules, and Exhibits:

(1) Financial Statements

The financial statements filed as part of this filing are listed on the index to the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, on page 44.46.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8, or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

Exhibits are listed in the exhibit index beginning on page 87.89. The exhibits include management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K by Item 601 (10) (iii) of Regulation S-K.


8487


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 9th day of February, 2018.

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

By

/s/ Lance M. Fritz

Lance M. Fritz,

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Union Pacific Corporation

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below, on this 9th day of February, 2018, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND DIRECTOR:

By

/s/ Lance M. Fritz

Lance M. Fritz,

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Union Pacific Corporation

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER:

By

/s/ Robert M. Knight, Jr.

Robert M. Knight, Jr.,

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:

By

/s/ Todd M. Rynaski

Todd M. Rynaski,

Vice President and Controller

DIRECTORS:

Andrew H. Card, Jr.*

Michael R. McCarthy*

Erroll B. Davis, Jr.*

Michael W. McConnell*

David B. Dillon*

Thomas F. McLarty III*

Deborah C. Hopkins*

Jane H. Lute*

Bhavesh V. Patel*  

Steven R. Rogel*

Jose H. Villarreal*

* By

James J. Theisen, Jr.

James J. Theisen, Jr., Attorney-in-fact

85


SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Union Pacific Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millions, for the Years Ended December 31,

2017 2016 2015 

2020 

2019

2018

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

$

22 

$

16 

$

21 

Charges/(reduction) to expense

 

 

23 

 

Net recoveries/(write-offs)

 

(3)

 

(17)

 

(6)

Balance, end of period

$

20 

$

22 

$

16 

Allowance for doubtful accounts are presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

$

$

$

Long-term

 

17 

 

17 

 

11 

Balance, end of period

$

20 

$

22 

$

16 

Accrued casualty costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

$

716 

$

736 

$

757 

$

657 

$

709 

$

684 

Charges to expense

 

167 

 

202 

 

227 

231 

215 

202 

Cash payments and other reductions

 

(199)

 

(222)

 

(248)

(244)

(267)

(177)

Balance, end of period

$

684 

$

716 

$

736 

$

644 

$

657 

$

709 

Accrued casualty costs are presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued casualty costs are presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as follows:

Current

$

194 

$

185 

$

181 

$

177 

$

190 

$

211 

Long-term

 

490 

 

531 

 

555 

467 

467 

498 

Balance, end of period

$

684 

$

716 

$

736 

$

644 

$

657 

$

709 


8688


UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed with this Statement

10(a)

Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement dated February 8, 2018.4, 2021.

10(b)

Form of Stock Unit Agreement for Executives dated February 8, 2018.

10(c)

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executives dated February 8, 2018.4, 2021.

10(d)10(c)

Supplemental ThriftDeferred Compensation Plan (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation, effective as of January 1, 2009, including all amendments adopted through January 1, 2018.amended December 9, 2020.

10(e)10(d)

Supplemental Pension Plan for Officers and Managers (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates, as amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 1989, including all amendments adopted through January 1, 2018.December 9, 2020.

1221

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

21

List of the Corporation’s significant subsidiaries and their respective states of incorporation.

23

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent.

24

Powers of attorney executed by the directors of UPC.

31(a)

Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), of the Exchange Act, as Adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Lance M. Fritz.

31(b)

Certifications Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), of the Exchange Act, as Adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Robert M. Knight, Jr.–Jennifer L. Hamann.

32

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Lance M. Fritz and Robert M. Knight, Jr.Jennifer L. Hamann.

101

eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) documents submitted electronically: 101.INS (XBRL Instance Document), 101.SCH (XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document), 101.CAL (XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document), 101.LAB (XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document), 101.DEF (XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document) and 101.PRE (XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document). The following financial and related information from Union Pacific Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172020 (filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018)5, 2021), is formatted in XBRL and submitted electronically herewith:Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL) includes (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019, and 2015,2018, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016,2019, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

104

87


Incorporated by ReferenceCover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in Inline XBRL (contained in Exhibit 101).

Incorporated by Reference

3(a)

Restated Articles of Incorporation of UPC, as amended and restated through June 27, 2011, and as further amended May 15, 2014, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.

3(b)

By-Laws of UPC, as amended, effective November 19, 2015, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 19, 2015.

89


4(a)

Description of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

4(a)4(b)

Indenture, dated as of December 20, 1996, between UPC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as successor to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-18345).

4(b)4(c)

Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1999, between UPC and The Bank of New York, as successor to JP Morgan Chase Bank, formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-75989).

4(c)4(d)

Form of 3.000%2.150% Note due 2027 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2017.January 31, 2020.

4(d)4(e)

Form of 4.000%2.400% Note due 20472030 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2017.January 31, 2020.

4(e)4(f)

Form of 3.600%3.250% Note due 20372050 is incorporated hereinby reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2020.

4(g)

Form of 3.750% Note due 2070 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2020.

4(h)

Form of 3.250% Note due 2050 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2017.April 7, 2020.

4(f)

Form of 4.100% Note due 2067 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2017.

Certain instruments evidencing long-term indebtedness of UPC are not filed as exhibits because the total amount of securities authorized under any single such instrument does not exceed 10% of the Corporation’s total consolidated assets. UPC agrees to furnish the Commission with a copy of any such instrument upon request by the Commission.

10(f)10(e)

Supplemental Thrift Plan (409A Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

10(g)10(f)

Supplemental Thrift Plan (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation, as amended January 1, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

10(g)

Supplemental Pension Plan for Officers and Managers (409A Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation and Affiliates, as amended February 1, 2013, and March 1, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

10(h)

Union Pacific Corporation Key Employee Continuity Plan, as amended February 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

88


10(i)

Union Pacific Corporation Executive Incentive Plan, effective May 5, 2005, amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

10(j)10(i)

Deferred Compensation Plan (409A Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation, as amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

90


10(k)10(j)

Deferred Compensation Plan (409A Non-Grandfathered Component) of Union Pacific Corporation, as amended December 17, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10(l)

Union Pacific Corporation 2000 Directors Plan, effective as of April 21, 2000, as amended November 16, 2006, January 30, 2007 and January 1, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

10(m)10(k)

Union Pacific Corporation Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors (409A Non-Grandfathered Component), effective as of January 1, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

10(n)10(l)

Union Pacific Corporation Stock Unit Grant and Deferred Compensation Plan for the Board of Directors (409A Grandfathered Component), as amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(l) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

10(o)10(m)

Union Pacific Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 16, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Corporation’s Form S-8 dated May 17, 2013.

10(p)

UPC 2004 Stock Incentive Plan amended March 1, 2013, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

10(q)10(n)

Union Pacific Corporation Policy for Recoupment of Incentive Compensation, effective January 1, 2020 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

10(o)

Union Pacific Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 16, 2013, as amended effective as of January 1, 2020 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

10(p)

Union Pacific Corporation Executive Incentive Plan, effective May 5, 2005, amended and restated effective January 1, 2020 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

10(q)

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 12, 1996, among UPC, UP Holding Company, Inc., Union Pacific Merger Co. and Southern Pacific Rail Corporation (SP) is incorporated herein by reference to Annex J to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-64707).

10(r)

Agreement, dated September 25, 1995, among UPC, UPRR, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (MPRR), SP, Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SPT), The Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (D&RGW), St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company (SLSRC) and SPCSL Corp. (SPCSL), on the one hand, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) and The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe), on the other hand, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33 64707)33-64707).

10(s)

Supplemental Agreement, dated November 18, 1995, between UPC, UPRR, MPRR, SP, SPT, D&RGW, SLSRC and SPCSL, on the one hand, and BN and Santa Fe, on the other hand, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to UPC’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33 64707)33-64707).

89


10(t)

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executives is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

10(u)

Form of Stock Unit Agreement for Executives is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

91


10(v)

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Executives is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10(w)

Form of Stock Unit Agreement for Executives is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10(x)

Form of 20152018 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

10(y)

Form of 20162019 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

10(z)

Form of 20172020 Long Term Plan Stock Unit Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

10(aa)

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

10(bb)

Executive Incentive Plan (2005) – Deferred Compensation Program, dated December 21, 2005 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

99

Form of U.S. $1,700,000,000 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 21, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.

† Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

90

92


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 5th day of February, 2021.

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION

By

/s/ Lance M. Fritz

Lance M. Fritz,

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Union Pacific Corporation

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below, on this 5th day of February, 2021, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND DIRECTOR:

By

/s/ Lance M. Fritz

Lance M. Fritz,

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Union Pacific Corporation

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER:

By

/s/ Jennifer L. Hamann

Jennifer L. Hamann

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:

By

/s/ Todd M. Rynaski

Todd M. Rynaski,

Vice President and Controller

DIRECTORS:

Andrew H. Card, Jr.*

Michael R. McCarthy*

William J. DeLaney*

Thomas F. McLarty III*

David B. Dillon*

Bhavesh V. Patel*

Deborah C. Hopkins*

Jose H. Villarreal*

Jane H. Lute*

Christopher J. Williams*

* By

/s/ Craig V. Richardson

Craig V. Richardson, Attorney-in-fact

93