UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| | | | | |
| ☒ | |
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For fiscal year ended December 31, 20172023
OR
| | | | | |
| ☐ | |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.1934 |
COMMISSION FILE NO. 001-06622
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTELME COMMUNITIES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | | | | | | | |
| Maryland | | 53-0261100 |
| | |
MARYLAND | | 53-0261100 |
| (State of incorporation) | | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
1775 EYE STREET, NW,7550 WISCONSIN AVE, SUITE 1000, WASHINGTON, DC 20006900, BETHESDA, MD 20814
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (202) 774-3200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Title of Each Classeach class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Shares of Beneficial Interest | ELME | New York Stock ExchangeNYSE |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
YES o NO x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90)90 days. YES x NO oYes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Large accelerated filer | x☒ | Accelerated filer | o☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | o☐ | Smaller reporting company | o☐ |
| | Emerging growth company | o☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO xYes ☐ No ☒
As of June 30, 2017,2023, the aggregate market value of such shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,436,739,462$1,429,202,578 (based on the closing price of the stockshares on June 30, 2017)2023).
As of February 15, 2018, 78,497,96313, 2024, 87,867,059 common shares were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20182024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as indicated herein.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTELME COMMUNITIES
20172023 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
INDEX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| PART I |
| | Page |
| | | |
| PART IItem 1. | Business | | | Page |
| | | |
| Item 1. | Business | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | |
| Item 1C. | Item 2. | PropertiesCybersecurity | |
| Item 2. | Item 3. | Legal ProceedingsProperties | |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | |
| | | |
| PART II | | | |
| | | |
| Item 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |
| Item 6. | Selected Financial DataReserved | |
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| Item 7A. | Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk | |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | |
| Item 9B. | Other Information | |
| Item 9C. | Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections | | |
| | | |
| PART III | | | |
| | | |
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | |
| | | |
| PART IV | | | |
| | | |
| Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | |
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary | |
| | Signatures | |
PART I
ITEM 1: BUSINESS
Washington REITElme Communities Overview
Elme Communities, a Maryland real estate investment trust, formerly known as Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”(the "Company"), is a self-administered equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”("REIT") and successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business primarily consists of the ownership and operation of income-producing real propertyapartment communities in the greater Washington, DC metro region.and Sunbelt regions. As of December 31, 2023, we owned 28 apartment communities and one office property.
Business and Investment Strategy
Our mission is to elevate the value living experience and create a place our residents are proud to call home by continuously focusing on service, efficiency, and innovation. We ownare focused on creating shareholder value by providing quality, affordably priced housing to a diversified portfoliodeep, solid, and growing base of office buildings, multifamily buildingsmid-market demand. Our research indicates that affordability is a pressing rental issue at multiple price points across the mid-market rent spectrum. We believe that rents can be consistently grown if a portfolio’s price point does not compete directly with new product price points and retail centers.wages for mid-market renters are growing.Furthermore, as the cost of homeownership continues to rise above affordable levels for median income earners, we expect to benefit from sustained demand for quality, affordably priced rental housing.
We acquire, develop, and renovate apartment communities that align with our research-led investment strategy, which is focused on the following:
•targeting markets that have economies with diverse, innovative industries that drive outsized job creation, wage growth and in-migration, which we believe will benefit from these trends in the years to come;
•targeting middle-income renters who make up the largest share of apartment demand in each of our current and target markets but for whom new apartment supply and the cost of owning a home is unaffordable;
•executing value-add renovations that are tailored to each submarket, target renter group and individual community to provide an improved yet affordable living experience while enhancing shareholder value; and
•targeting investment opportunities that provide the potential for significant appreciation in value and that have operating upside through community management strategies.
Our current strategy isresearch-focused approach enables us to generate returnscraft optimal strategies to provide the best combination of value, quality, and maximize shareholder value through proactiveresident experience in our apartment communities. We categorize our apartment communities among broader asset management and prudent capital allocation decisions. Consistent with this strategy, we invest in additional income-producing properties through acquisitions, development and redevelopment. We invest in properties where we believe we will be able to improveclasses, as determined by a variety of factors, including the operating results and increase the valueage of the property. We focus on properties inside the Washington metro region’s Beltway, near major transportation nodes and in areas with strong employmentour buildings, rent growth drivers and superiorrent relative to the market:
Class A
–Class A communities are recently developed and command rental rates above market median rents.
–Class A- communities have been developed within the past twenty years and feature operational improvements and unit upgrades and command rents at or above median market rents.
Class B
–Class B Value-Add communities feature operational improvements and strong potential for unit renovations. These communities, which are generally over twenty years old, command average rental rates below median market rents for units that have not been renovated.
–Class B communities feature operational improvements and command average rental rates below median market rents. Near-term rent growth demographics. We will seek to continue to upgrade our portfolio as opportunities arise, funding acquisitions with a combination of cash, equity, debtis driven by operational improvements and proceeds from property sales.market rent growth without unit renovations. These communities are over twenty years old and can become Class B Value-Add depending on future market rents and renovation opportunities.
Regional Real Estate Markets (1)
While we have historically focused most of our investments in the greater Washington, DC metro region, we expanded our footprint to the Atlanta metro region in order2021. Atlanta offers a range of diverse, innovative industries which we believe are poised to maximize acquisition opportunitiesbenefit from substantial job creation, rising wages, and continued migration in the coming years. As of December 31, 2023, we have acquired six apartment communities in the Atlanta metro region and we remain optimistic about the near and longer-term demand drivers in the Atlanta metro region.
Looking forward, we plan to continue to expand our footprint outside of the Washington, DC metro region. We intend to target markets with skilled labor development and in-migration, diverse economies with innovative industries, strong productivity and wage growth for middle income residents, and demand for affordable mid-market housing.
We believe our portfolio's allocation in the Atlanta and Washington, DC metro regions, and our focus on value-oriented price points, will help enable our future growth, while also may consider opportunities to replicate our Washington-focused approachproviding relative insulation during economic downturns. Over the past five and 10-year periods, Class B rent growth has outperformed Class A in other geographic markets which meet the criteria described above.
Allboth of our officersoperating markets. Additionally, our mid-market price points generally do not compete with new supply, as our average monthly rent is generally several hundred dollars below the asking rent for new deliveries. Moreover, the national cost of owning a home compared to renting a single-family starter home is the highest it’s been in over 20 years. As housing remains undersupplied, interest rates remain high and employees livethe cost of homeownership remains unaffordable for many median-income households, we expect to benefit from sustained demand for quality, affordable rental options.
Washington, DC metro region (22 apartment communities)
In the fourth quarter of 2023, the Washington, DC metro region absorbed 1,600 units (the third highest 4th quarter performance on record for the Washington, DC metro region), as 4,000 units delivered concurrently. The rebound in demand in 2023 brought annual demand to 10,800 units, a top five performance nationwide. Despite healthy absorption, supply and workdemand remained imbalanced. As a result, occupancy ticked down 40 basis points over the year to 94.7%.
Effective asking rents declined 0.4% in the fourth quarter of 2023 compared to the third quarter of 2023, averaging $2,110 per month, or near$2.39 per square foot, pushing annual rent growth down to 2.5%. Annual rent change, as of the greater Washington metro region.fourth quarter of 2023, was highest among Class B multifamily properties at 3.7% with Class A multifamily properties trailing behind at 2.4%. Generally, rents grew most in low supply submarkets, whereas rent cuts were most common in higher supply areas. Occupancy remained strongest in Class B multifamily properties at 95.2%.
Our Regional Economy and Real Estate Markets
The Washington, DC metro economy is considered to be recession-resistant due to a high concentration of government and government-affiliated jobs. Annual job growth for the Washington, DC metro region, experienced moderate job growth during 2017 with approximately 48,900 net job additions, according to Delta Associates / Transwestern Commercial Services (“Delta”), a national full service real estate firm that provides market research and evaluation services for commercial property. This job growth is higher thanas reported by the region's 20-year annual averageU.S. Bureau of 44,100 newLabor Statistics was 1.4% or, 48,400 jobs with growth in the private sector partially offset by net job losses of 4,200 in the Federal government. Current estimates by Delta indicate that the region's unemployment rate was 3.6% as of November 2017, unchanged from2023, year-over-year. The RealPage Market Analytics apartment market outlook points to a heavy construction pipeline with 29,400 units currently under construction, of which 18,200 are planned for delivery over the prior yearnext year. Given the projected pipeline, rent and lower thanoccupancy performance are expected to vary across submarkets, with market-level readings that roughly match the national average in the coming two to three-year window.
Atlanta metro region (6 apartment communities)
In the fourth quarter of 3.9%2023, the Atlanta metro region absorbed 2,900 units (the fourth highest 4th quarter performance on record for the Atlanta metro region), as 5,400 units delivered concurrently. Quarterly occupancy in the market contracted 40 basis points year-over-year to about 92.3%. Delta expectsAnnual demand rose to 9,700 units, a significant improvement from the annual net move-outs of 7,000 units recorded in the first quarter of 2023.
The Atlanta metro region recorded an annual rent cut of 4.7%, with effective asking rents averaging $1,628 per month, or $1.60 per square foot. Class C multifamily properties saw the steepest rent decline of 6.6% on average, followed by Class B multifamily properties with rent cuts of 4.3% on average, and Class A multifamily properties with rent cuts of 3.6% on average. All but one of Atlanta’s 39 submarkets posted rent cuts on an annual basis.
Annual job growth infor the WashingtonAtlanta metro region as reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was 2.5%, or 76,500 jobs added as of November 2023, year-over-year. The RealPage Market Analytics apartment market outlook has 34,300 units currently under construction, of which 23,100 are planned for delivery over the next year. In the short term, rent change and occupancy are expected to remain steady in 2018 as strong consumer spendingmuted and higher corporate profits in the private sector are offset by public sector uncertainty. Certain market statistics and information from several third party providers for the Washington metro region are set forth below:
Office
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Average asking rent per square foot | $ | 42.14 |
| | $ | 37.25 |
|
| Total vacancy rate at year end | 17.0 | % | | 16.1 | % |
Net absorption (in millions of square feet) (1) | (0.1 | ) | | 1.1 |
|
| Office space under construction at year end (in millions of square feet) | 11.8 |
| | 10.0 |
|
Source: Jones Lang LaSalle, "JLL," a commercial real estate services firm
(1) Net absorption is defined as the change in occupied, standing inventory from one year to the next.
According to JLL, a commercial real estate firm, the increase in average asking rents in the Washington metro region was primarily due to higher demand throughout the region, particularly in areas close to Metro stations. The 2017 total vacancy rate is higher than the prior year, and above the national average of 14.9%. The higher vacancy rate is primarily due to the delivery of 3.5 million square feet of new office space, primarily in Washington, DC and Northern Virginia, over the last year. JLL projects downward pressure on occupancy and effective rents in 2018 due to the influx of new space.
Multifamily
|
| | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Increase in net effective rents (Class A and B) | 1.3 | % | | 1.6 | % |
| (Decrease) increase in net effective rents (Class A) | (0.1 | )% | | 1.1 | % |
| Increase in net effective rents (Class B) | 1.8 | % | | 2.1 | % |
| Stabilized vacancy rate (Class A and B) | 4.9 | % | | 4.7 | % |
| Stabilized vacancy rate (Class A) | 5.2 | % | | 4.8 | % |
| Stabilized vacancy rate (Class B) | 4.8 | % | | 4.5 | % |
| New apartment deliveries (# of units) | 15,592 |
| | 12,105 |
|
Source: MPF Research, a division of RealPage, a commercial real estate management software company that provides market research
According to MPF Research, the multifamily real estate market's low vacancy rate reflects the region's strong demand, though the large influx of new supply has kept rental rate growth below the national average. New apartment deliveries are projected to increase to approximately 16,400 units in 2018, which is expected to negatively impact occupancy and suppress rental rate growth, particularly for Class A properties.move closer to national norms in 2025, once the current supply wave moderates.
(1) The source of all regional market numerical data in this section is RealPage Market Analytics
Retail
|
| | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Increase (decrease) in rental rates at neighborhood centers | 3.0 | % | | (0.1 | )% |
| Vacancy at neighborhood centers at year-end | 5.6 | % | | 5.4 | % |
| Net absorption (in millions of square feet) | (0.3 | ) | | 0.6 |
|
Source: CoStar, a provider of real estate market research and analytics
The retail real estate market in the Washington metro region was mixed in 2017, with higher rental rates offset by higher vacancy and negative absorption, according to CoStar. CoStar projects strong demand to continue in 2018 due to increasing average household income in the Washington metro region.
Our Portfolio
As of December 31, 2017,2023, we owned a diversified portfolio of 49 properties, totaling approximately 6.4 million9,400 residential apartment homes in the Washington, DC metro and Sunbelt regions. We also owned approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial space and 4,268 residential units, and land held for development. These 49 properties consist of 20 office properties, 13 multifamily properties and 16 retail centers.in the Washington, DC metro region. The percentage of total real estate rental revenue from continuing operations by segmentproperty type for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2023, and the percent leased as ofaverage occupancy for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Average Occupancy, year ended December 31, 2023 | | % of Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| 95% | Residential | 92 | % | | 91 | % | | 89 | % |
| 90% | Other | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | 11 | % |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Percent Leased December 31, 2017(1) | | % of Total Real Estate Rental Revenue |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| 95% | Office | 52 | % | | 53 | % | | 57 | % |
| 97% | Multifamily | 29 | % | | 27 | % | | 22 | % |
| 94% | Retail | 19 | % | | 20 | % | | 21 | % |
| | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| |
(1)
| Calculated as the percentage of physical net rentable area leased, except for multifamily, which is calculated as the percentage of units leased. The net rentable area leased for office and retail properties includes temporary lease agreements. |
On a combined basis, our commercial portfolio (i.e., our office and retail properties) was 95% leased at December 31, 2017, 93% leased at December 31, 2016 and 93% leased at December 31, 2015.
Total real estate rental revenue from continuing operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 20172023, was $325.1$227.9 million, $313.3$209.4 million and $306.4$169.2 million, respectively. During the three years ended December 31, 2017,2023, we acquired six residential properties and placed one office property and two multifamily properties (including parcels for development) and substantially completed major construction activities at two office redevelopment projects.residential development project into service. During that same period, we sold sixtwelve office properties three multifamily properties, oneand eight retail property and interests in land held for development.properties. See note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our operating results by segment.
The commercial lease expirations for the next ten years and thereafter are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | # of Leases | | Square Feet | | Gross Annual Rent (in thousands) | | Percentage of Total Gross Annual Rent |
| Office: | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | 46 |
| | 213,500 |
| | $ | 8,508 |
| | 5 | % |
| 2019 | 62 |
| | 636,587 |
| | 28,561 |
| | 17 | % |
| 2020 | 49 |
| | 428,210 |
| | 20,482 |
| | 12 | % |
| 2021 | 62 |
| | 444,032 |
| | 19,074 |
| | 11 | % |
| 2022 | 37 |
| | 370,262 |
| | 16,758 |
| | 10 | % |
| 2023 | 42 |
| | 245,704 |
| | 11,423 |
| | 7 | % |
| 2024 | 33 |
| | 192,129 |
| | 9,017 |
| | 5 | % |
| 2025 | 25 |
| | 173,365 |
| | 8,688 |
| | 5 | % |
| 2026 | 20 |
| | 321,856 |
| | 11,547 |
| | 7 | % |
| 2027 | 25 |
| | 294,905 |
| | 18,641 |
| | 11 | % |
| Thereafter | 18 |
| | 399,621 |
| | 19,314 |
| | 10 | % |
| Total | 419 |
| | 3,720,171 |
| | $ | 172,013 |
| | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail: | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | 26 |
| | 236,324 |
| | $ | 2,741 |
| | 5 | % |
| 2019 | 31 |
| | 118,833 |
| | 3,665 |
| | 7 | % |
| 2020 | 40 |
| | 385,014 |
| | 7,163 |
| | 14 | % |
| 2021 | 23 |
| | 218,039 |
| | 3,892 |
| | 7 | % |
| 2022 | 45 |
| | 298,518 |
| | 8,170 |
| | 16 | % |
| 2023 | 30 |
| | 224,601 |
| | 6,691 |
| | 13 | % |
| 2024 | 28 |
| | 219,049 |
| | 6,045 |
| | 12 | % |
| 2025 | 20 |
| | 106,811 |
| | 3,163 |
| | 6 | % |
| 2026 | 17 |
| | 136,245 |
| | 4,877 |
| | 9 | % |
| 2027 | 14 |
| | 98,086 |
| | 3,569 |
| | 6 | % |
| Thereafter | 8 |
| | 29,562 |
| | 2,464 |
| | 5 | % |
| Total | 282 |
| | 2,071,082 |
| | $ | 52,440 |
| | 100 | % |
According to Delta, the professional/business services and government sectors constituted over 40% of payroll jobs in the Washington metro area at the end of 2017. Due to our geographic concentration in the Washington metro area, a significant number of our tenants have historically been concentrated in the professional/business services and government sectors, although the exact amount will vary from time to time. As a result of this concentration, we are susceptible to business trends (both positive and negative) that affect the outlook for these sectors.
No single tenant accounted for more than 5% of real estate rental revenue from continuing operations in 2017, 2016 or 2015. All federal government tenantsany of the three years ended December 31, 2023.
In October 2022, we began a process to internalize our management operations, and this process was completed in July 2023. Prior to the aggregate accounted for less than 1%completion of our real estate rental revenue in 2017.
Our ten largest tenants, in terms of real estate rental revenue for 2017, are as follows:
|
| |
1. | Advisory Board Company |
2. | World Bank |
3. | Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. |
4. | Atlantic Media, Inc. |
5. | Capital One, N.A. |
6. | Blank Rome LLP |
7. | Engility Corporation |
8. | Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP |
9. | Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
10. | Morgan Stanley, Smith Barney |
We enter into arrangements from time to time by which various service providers conduct day-to-day property management and/or leasing activities at our properties.internalization, Bozzuto Management Company ("Bozzuto") began conductingand Greystar Real Estate Partners ("Greystar") provided community management and leasing services at the majority of our residential communities. Bozzuto and Greystar provided such services under individual community management agreements for each residential community, each of which was separately terminable by us or Bozzuto/Greystar, as applicable. Although they varied by community, on average, the fees charged by Bozzuto/Greystar under each agreement were approximately 3% of revenues at each residential community. As of December 31, 2023, we have transitioned all of our residential communities to Elme management. Stream Realty Partners ("Stream") provides property management and leasing services at our multifamily properties in 2014. Bozzuto provides such services under individualsole office property, management agreements for each property, each of which is separately terminable by us or Bozzuto. Although they vary by property, on average, the fees charged by Bozzuto under each agreement are approximately 3% of revenues at the property.Watergate 600.
We expect to continue investing in additional income-producing properties through acquisitions, development and redevelopment. We invest in properties where we believe we will be able to improve the operating results and increase the value of the property. Our properties typically compete for tenants with other properties on the basis of location, quality and rental rates.
We make capital improvements to our properties on an ongoing basis for the purpose of maintaining and increasing their value and income. Major improvements and/or renovations to the properties during the three years ended December 31, 20172023 are discussed in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading “Capital Improvements and Development Costs.”
Further description of the property groupsproperties is contained in Item 2, Properties, and Notenote 14 to the consolidated financial statements, Segment Information, and in Schedule III. Reference is also made to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Environmental, Social and Governance
At Elme Communities, our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) strategy is to operate and grow in a sustainable, responsible manner that contributes to positive economic, social, and environmental outcomes for shareholders, employees, and the communities in which we serve. We intend to continue providing an annual ESG report that includes disclosures aligned with Global Reporting Initiative Standards 2016, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. This report can be found online at https://www.elmecommunities.com/esg/. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered part of this document.
Environmental
In 2021, we announced our commitment to net zero carbon operation in alignment with the Urban Land Institute’s Greenprint Net Zero by 2050 Goal. In 2023, we joined the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Better Climate Challenge, further aligning greenhouse gas emission reduction with industry leaders. Meeting this goal requires that we fully integrate a focus on carbon reductions into our strategic approach and at all levels of our organization throughout our portfolio.
We implement sustainable policies and practices at all of our properties, for purposes of ensuring occupants and residents work and live in efficient, healthy spaces. We track annual asset-level performance of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption, utilizing ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager as well as Measurabl ESG software. We apply industry standard rating systems such as the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (“BREEAM”) to establish sustainable practices for building design, construction, operations, and maintenance. During unit renovations, we replace end-of-life appliances with ENERGY STAR rated equipment; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems with more efficient models; as well as update water fixtures to low-flow options. Additionally, we continue to expand our electric vehicle charging stations across our portfolio to support the transition of our residents to electric transportation.
Social
Among our social initiatives is a commitment to financial inclusion, pursuant to which we aim to increase the availability and equality of financial service opportunities, remove barriers to the financial sector, and enable individuals to improve their financial wellbeing. Beyond credit history, life-altering events can interrupt a resident’s ability to pay rent, including job loss, medical emergencies, domestic violence, and other hardships. This can lead to delinquencies, increased interest rate debt, potential eviction, and situational unhousing.
In 2022, we announced a partnership with a financial technology company to dismantle barriers to housing for working families. Through this partnership, on-time rent payments are reported monthly to all three credit bureaus, providing an opportunity for residents to build their credit. This no-cost amenity is available to 100% of our community residents. This initiative follows a “do no harm” mindset. Therefore, only on-time payments—not delinquencies—are reported.
In addition to credit reporting, our technology partner's platform offers housing stability loans for residents experiencing financial hardship. These interest-free loans provide up to three months of rent relief, enabling residents to remain housed during difficult times. Residents can then work with our technology partner to set up a 12-month repayment plan for the loan.
These programs support the short- and long-term financial well-being of our residents.
In addition to financial wellness, we support our residents physical and mental health and wellness through on-site amenities such as gymnasiums, pools, playgrounds, and community rooms, as well as close access to bike lanes, walking/running paths, parks, and other outdoor amenities. In 2023, we certified our first five communities to Fitwel Health and Wellness. The certification is awarded to buildings that promote occupant health and well-being by incorporating a number of evidence-based design and operations strategies that support the physical, mental, and social health of occupants.
Governance
At Elme, we hold ourselves, our suppliers, and the Board of Trustees (the "Board") to high ethical standards as we seek to increase shareholder value and foster a collaborative, innovative corporate culture. Our team is required to read and certify their knowledge on our Code of Ethics, in addition to receiving ethics training throughout the year. Our Board is responsible for corporate policy and management oversight to enhance long-term shareholder value. In 2020, our Board formalized the oversight of ESG initiatives, recognizing that environmental and social matters—together with strong corporate governance—play a critical role in the execution of our ESG strategy.
Some of our ESG policies, including our Human Rights Policy, Vendor Code of Conduct, and Environmental Sustainability Policy, can be found on our website at elmecommunities.com/esg/governance/.
We are made up of growth-oriented, hardworking individuals dedicated to transforming creative ideas into decisive action. Our flat organizational structure facilitates frequent, meaningful interactions with Company executives, and our commitment to teamwork and entrepreneurial spirit enables employees at every level to conceptualize ideas and make them happen. We create an environment designed to encourage people to do what they do best, all while learning, growing, and contributing in meaningful ways to build a better company. We trust, encourage, and support one another, driving our pursuit of excellence.
Human Capital
Employees, Training and Development
On February 15, 2018,13, 2024, we had 149243 employees, including 74175 persons engaged in propertycommunity management functions who were hired in connection with the internalization of our community management functions, and 7568 persons engaged in corporate, financial, leasing, asset management and other functions. Of the 175 persons engaged in community management functions, 44 are employed in the Atlanta metro region at six different communities, with the remainder in the Washington, DC metro region. All of our officers and substantially all of our corporate-level employees live and work in or near the greater Washington, DC metro region, and our community management employees live and work in or near their respective communities.
Our human capital resources objectives include identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our new and existing employees. At Elme Communities, we place great value on employee growth through goals, feedback and professional and leadership development offerings. Our human resources team provides ongoing training and development opportunities to all employees. We financially support employees pursuing industry-specific training and certification programs and we encourage employees to join professional organizations that offer technical, soft skill and leadership development workshops.
Additionally, our compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and reward our workforce, with the goal of motivating employees to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve our objectives, including increasing shareholder value.
Health, Safety and Well-being
We support our employees with a robust and competitive employee benefits program, including a flexible vacation policy, parental leave, 401(k) matching, tuition reimbursement, an Employee Assistance Program, and other programs.
Additionally, we have a wellness program that provides fun, engaging challenges to encourage employees to continuously improve their physical, mental, and financial well-being. In our corporate office, we offer two wellness rooms for employees to take a break to decompress.
Our technological capabilities allow our corporate-level employees the flexibility to work from anywhere at any time. This allows us to easily meet our residents’ needs as well as those of our employees.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility
Our Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Initiative ("DEIA") is a long-term commitment to promoting an environment where each individual feels comfortable being their most authentic selves. We believe diversity of backgrounds, experiences, cultures, ethnicities, and interests leads to new ways of thinking and drives engagement and organizational success. Our diverse Cultural Advisory Board ("CAB") is overseen by our senior leadership team and our Board. The CAB tracks and monitors our diversity metrics and facilitates learning and training opportunities, including a diversity speaker series, targeted recruitment and relationship development with diverse industry groups for internships and employment opportunities and partnering with community-based non-profits for volunteer activities.
Community Engagement
As a REIT, investing is at the core of what we do, but the most valuable investments we make are not in our buildings but in our people and our community. We are passionate about making a difference in the regions we call home.
We are committed to improving the lives of those in need, and our employees participate in a wide variety of philanthropic activities throughout the year. Whether volunteering at a food bank, running a toy drive, walking for a cause, or participating in our company-wide community service day, we are proud to foster a culture of giving back.
Regulation
REIT Tax Status
We believe that we qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and intend to continue to qualify as such. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are, among other things required to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains), to our shareholders on an annual basis. When selling a property, we generally have the option of (a) reinvesting the sales proceeds of property sold, in a way that allows us to defer recognition of some or all of the taxable gain realized on the sale, (b) distributing gains to the shareholders with no tax to us or (c) treating net long-term capital gains as having been distributed to our shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to our shareholders.
Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”).subsidiary. Our TRSs aretaxable REIT subsidiary is subject to corporate U.S. federal, state and local income tax on theirits taxable income at regular statutory rates (see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure).
Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Tax TreatmentThe properties in our portfolio must comply with Title III of Recent Disposition Activitythe ADA, to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” as defined by the ADA. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. We believe that our properties are in substantial compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to make substantial capital expenditures to address the requirements of the ADA. However, noncompliance with the ADA could result in an imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. The obligation to make readily accessible accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our properties and make alterations as appropriate in this respect.
Fair Housing Act ("FHA")
The FHA, its state law counterparts and the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and various state agencies, prohibit discrimination in housing on the basis of race or color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women and people securing custody of children under 18) or handicap (disability) and, in some states, financial capability or other bases. A failure to comply with these laws in our operations could result in litigation, fines, penalties or other adverse claims, or could result in limitations or restrictions on our ability to operate, any of which could materially and adversely affect us. We believe that we operate our properties in substantial compliance with the FHA.
Environmental Matters
We soldare subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental, health, safety and zoning laws and regulations that govern our interestsoperations, including with respect to air emissions, wastewater, and the use, storage and disposal of hazardous and toxic substances and petroleum products. The cost to comply with such laws and regulations may be significant, and such laws may become more stringent over time. If we fail to comply with such laws, including if we fail to obtain any required permits or licenses, we could face substantial fines or possible revocation of our authority to conduct some of our operations.
In addition, under various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the environment, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, waste or petroleum products at, on, in, under, or migrating from such property, including costs to investigate and remediate such contamination and liability for natural resources damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the following properties duringowner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the three years ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property | | Type | | # of units | | Rentable Square Feet | | Contract Sales Price (in thousands) | | Gain on Sale (in thousands) |
| 2017: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Walker House Apartments | | Multifamily | | 212 |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 32,200 |
| | $ | 23,838 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2016: | | | | | | | | | | |
Dulles Station, Phase II (1) | | Office | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 12,100 |
| | $ | 527 |
|
Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I (2) | | Office | | N/A |
| | 692,000 |
| | 111,500 |
| | 23,585 |
|
Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II (3) | | Office | | N/A |
| | 491,000 |
| | 128,500 |
| | 77,592 |
|
| | | Total 2016 | |
|
| | 1,183,000 |
| | $ | 252,100 |
| | $ | 101,704 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Country Club Towers | | Multifamily | | 227 |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 37,800 |
| | $ | 30,277 |
|
1225 First Street (4) | | Multifamily | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 14,500 |
| | — |
|
| Munson Hill Towers | | Multifamily | | 279 |
| | N/A |
| | 57,050 |
| | 51,395 |
|
| Montgomery Village Center | | Retail | | N/A |
| | 197,000 |
| | 27,750 |
| | 7,981 |
|
| | | Total 2015 | | 506 |
| | 197,000 |
| | $ | 137,100 |
| | $ | 89,653 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1)
| Land held for future development and an interest in a parking garage. |
| |
(2)
| Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I consists of 6110 Executive Boulevard, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Wayne Plaza and West Gude Drive. |
| |
(3)
| Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II consists of 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza. |
| |
(4)
| 95% interest in land held for future development. |
All disclosed gains on sale are calculatedpresence of such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. In addition, we also may be liable for the costs of remediating contamination at off-site waste disposal facilities to which we have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances, without regard to whether we complied with environmental laws in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We reinvested a portiondoing so. These liabilities for remediation could be substantial and the cost of any required remediation, fines, or other costs could exceed the value of the Maryland Office Portfolio, Medical Office Portfolio, Country Club Towers, Munson Hill Towersproperty and/or our aggregate assets. In addition, the presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may expose us to third-party liability for costs of remediation and/or bodily injury or property damage or materially adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop our properties or to borrow using the properties as collateral. In addition, environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and Montgomery Village Center sales proceedscosts it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in replacement properties through deferred tax exchanges.which property may be used or
We distributed all of our ordinary taxable incomebusinesses may be operated, and capital gains for the three years ended December 31, 2017 to our shareholders.these restrictions may require substantial expenditures.
Availability of Reports
Copies of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on the Internet on our website www.washreit.com.www.elmecommunities.com. All required reports are made available on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered part of this document.
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy statements, information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
|
| |
Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our shareholders. We refer to the shares of beneficial interest in Washington REITElme Communities as our “common shares,” and the investors who own shares as our “shareholders.” This section includes or refers to certain forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on such forward-looking statements beginning on page 4742. |
Risks Related to our Business and Operations
We may be unable to successfully expand our operations into new markets and submarkets, which could have a material adverse effect on us, the trading price of our shares and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We intend to further expand our residential platform through acquisitions in Sunbelt markets. Our current targeted expansion markets include Atlanta, Georgia, Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina, Charlotte, North Carolina and Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas. Between 2021 and 2023, we acquired six apartment communities in the Atlanta metro region and plan to continue to invest in the Sunbelt region in 2024 and beyond. However, our historic operations have been concentrated in the Washington DC, metro region, where we have expertise in acquiring and operating assets. The risks applicable to our ability to acquire, integrate and operate apartment communities in the Washington DC, metro region are also applicable to our ability to acquire, integrate and operate apartment communities in new markets. In addition to these risks, we will not possess the same level of familiarity with the dynamics and market conditions of any new markets that we have entered or that we may enter as we do with the Washington, DC market, which could adversely affect our ability to expand and success in expanding into those markets. Furthermore, we may be unable to build a significant market presence or achieve a desired return on our investments in communities in new markets. The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on us, the trading price of our shares and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with our real estate assetsapartment communities and with the real estate industry, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to paymake distributions to our shareholders.
Our financial performance and the value of our real estate assetsapartment communities are subject to the risk that if our office, retail and multifamily propertiesthey do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures, which could cause our cash flow and ability to paymake distributions to our shareholders willto be adversely affected. TheAny of the following factors, among others, may adversely affect the cash flow generated by our commercialapartment communities and multifamily properties:ability to make distributions to our shareholders:
downturns•a decrease in demand for rental properties over home ownership resulting from, among other reasons, resident preferences, decreases in housing prices and mortgage interest rates, and government programs to promote home ownership or subsidize rental housing, slow or negative employment growth and household formation;
•competition with other housing alternatives, including owner occupied single and residential apartment homes;
•a return of the national, regional and local economic climate;availability of low-interest mortgages or the availability of mortgages requiring little or no down payment for single family home buyers;
•declines in the financial condition of our tenants;residents;
declines in consumer confidence, unemployment rates and consumer tastes and preferences;
•significant job losses in the professional/business services industries or government;regions in which we operate;
competition from similar asset type properties;
the inability or unwillingness of our tenants to pay rent increases;
changes in market rental rates and related concessions granted to tenants including, but not limited to, free rent and tenant improvement allowances;
local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for office, retail and multifamily properties;
•changes in interest rates and availability of financing;
increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities•economic and market conditions including: migration to areas outside of major metropolitan areas where our portfolio is concentrated, new construction and excess inventory of residential and owned housing/condominiums, increasing portions of owned housing/condominium stock being converted to rental use;
•the effects of government regulation in the real estate taxes;industry;
vacancies, changes in market rental rates•our ability to integrate new technological innovations into our properties to attract residents;
•our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel with knowledge of the need to periodically repair, renovatemarket; and re-let space;
inflation;
•political conditions, civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters, terrorist acts or acts of war;war and actual or anticipated geopolitical instability.
decreases
Substantially all of our investments are concentrated in the underlyingmultifamily asset class, which make us more vulnerable to a downturn in that asset class and could adversely affect our results of operations.
As of December 31, 2023, substantially all of our investments are concentrated in the multifamily industry, and we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single type of property. A downturn or slowdown in the demand for multifamily housing may have more pronounced effects on our results of operations or on the value of our assets than when we had investments in more than one asset class.
Additionally, the multifamily industry is also highly competitive. We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate.estate investment activities, including individuals, corporations, bank and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, and other entities engaged in real estate investment activities.Many of these entities have significant financial and other resources, including operating experience, allowing them to compete effectively with us.Competitors with substantially greater financial resources than us may be able to accept more risk than we can effectively manage.In addition, those competitors that are not REITs may be at an advantage to the extent they can use working capital to finance projects, while we (and our competitors that are REITs) may have to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investments as we must comply with REIT requirements. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amount available for distribution to shareholders. Thus, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, or, in certain cases, maintain ownership of, certain attractive investments.
Competition may also result in overbuilding of multifamily properties, causing an increase in the number of multifamily units available which could potentially decrease occupancy and multifamily rental rates at our properties.We may also be required to expend substantial sums to attract new residents.These factors may cause the resale value of properties to be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the net revenues generated by the property. Further, costs associated with real estate investment generally are not reduced when circumstances, such as a pandemic, cause a reduction in income from the investment.
Each of these factors could possibly limit our ability to retain our current residents, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could lower the value of our properties and adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Macroeconomic trends, including inflation and rising interest rates, may adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.
Macroeconomic trends, including increases in inflation and rising interest rates, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. In recent years, inflation in the United States has risen to levels not experienced in recent decades, including rising energy prices, prices for consumer goods, interest rates and wages. These increases and any interventions, fiscal or otherwise, by the U.S. government in reaction to such events could negatively impact our business by increasing our operating costs and borrowing costs as well as decreasing the cash available to our residents and tenants and prospective residents and tenants who wish to rent in our communities. Although we expect to be able to increase rent to combat the effects of inflation, the cost to operate and maintain communities could increase faster or at a rate greater than our ability to increase rents that residents and tenants would be willing to pay, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, a decline in the market value of real estate in the regions in which we operate may result in the carrying value of certain real estate assets exceeding their fair value, which has recently and in the future may require us to recognize an impairment to those assets. For example, we recognized an impairment in the third quarter of 2023 on our sole remaining office property, Watergate 600. Also, if prevailing interest rates or other factors, such as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans or the loss of the benefits of hedging arrangements, results in higher interest rates on our indebtedness, the increased interest expenses would adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition, and results of operation.
We are currently dependent upon the economic and regulatory climate of the Washington, metropolitan region,DC and Atlanta metro regions, which may impact financial condition and results of operations.
As of December 31, 2023, 75% of our profitability.
All of the properties in our portfolio areresidential apartment homes were located in the Washington, DC metro region and such25% of our residential apartment homes were located in the Atlanta, Georgia metro region. While we intend to continue expansion of our platform in the Sunbelt region, our current concentration in just two geographic metro regions may expose us to a greater amount of market dependentmarket-dependent risk than if we were more geographically diverse. GeneralOur performance could be adversely affected by the economic conditions in, and other factors relating to, these two geographic areas, including zoning and other regulatory conditions, competition for residents and supply and demand for apartment in these regions, as well as unemployment and job growth. Additionally, in the Washington, DC and Atlanta metro regions, general economic conditions and local real estate conditions in the Washington metro region are dependent upon various industries that are predominant in ourthe area (such as, in Washington, D.C., government and professional/business services). A downturn in one or more of these industries may have a particularly strong effect on the economic climate of ourthe region. Additionally, weWe are also susceptible to adverse developments in the regulatory environment of any of the markets in which we operate, particularly Washington, D.C. regulatory environment,, such as increases in real estate and other taxes, and the costs of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulations.regulations, including zoning and tax laws, and actual or threatened reductions in government spending and/or changes to the timing of government spending, as has occurred during federal government shutdowns. To the extent that these markets become less desirable to operate in, our results of operations could be more negatively impacted than if we were more geographically diversified. In the event of negative economic and/or regulatory changes in our region,the regions in which we operate, we may experience a negative impact to our profitability and may be limited in our ability to meet our financial obligations when due and/or make distributions to our shareholders.
We may be adversely affected by any significant reductions in federal government spending, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Short-term leases expose us to the Washington metro region, a significant portioneffects of our properties is occupied by tenants that are directly or indirectly serving the U. S. Government as federal contractors or otherwise. A significant reduction in federal government spending, particularly a sudden decrease due to a sequestration process, such as occurred in recent years, or due to extended uncertainty in the political climate in a way that affects the federal appropriations process by decreasing, delaying or making uncertain the results and stability of federal appropriations, could adversely affect the ability of these tenants to fulfill lease obligations or decrease the likelihood that they will renew their leases with us. Further, economic conditions in the Washington metro region are significantly dependent upon the level of federal government spending in the region as a whole. In the event of an actual or anticipated significant reduction in federal government spending, there could be negative economic changes in our
region, which could adversely impact the ability of our tenants to perform their financial obligations under our leases or the likelihood of their lease renewals. As a result, if such a reduction in federal government spending were to occur or be anticipated for an extended period, we could experience an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We face risks associated with property development/redevelopment.
We may, from time to time, engage in development and redevelopment activities, some of which may be significant. Developing or redeveloping properties presents a number of risks for us, including risks that:
if we are unable to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations or cease development of the project for any other reason, the development opportunity may be abandoned or postponed after expending significant resources, resulting in the loss of deposits or failure to recover expenses already incurred;
the development and construction costs of the project may exceed original estimates due to increased interest rates and increased cost of materials, labor, leasing or other expenditures, which could make the completion of the project less profitable becausedeclining market rents may not increase sufficiently to compensate for the increase in construction costs;
construction and/or permanent financing may not be available on favorable terms or may not be available at all, which may cause the cost of the project to increase and lower the expected return;
the project may not be completed on schedule, or at all, as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as weather, labor conditions and material shortages, which would result in increases in construction costs and debt service expenses;
the time between commencement of a development project and the stabilization of the completed property exposes us to risks associated with fluctuations in local and regional economic conditions;
occupancy rates and rents at the completed property may not meet the expected levels and could be insufficient to make the property profitable; and
there may not be sufficient development opportunities available.
Properties developed or acquired for development may generate little or no cash flow from the date of acquisition through the date of completion of development. In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, may require a substantial portion of management’s time and attention.
These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We face risks associated with property acquisitions.
We intend to continue to acquire properties which would increase our size and could alter our capital structure. Our acquisition activities and results may be exposed to the following risks:
we may have difficulty finding properties that are consistent with our strategies and that meet our standards;
we may have difficulty negotiating with new or existing tenants;
we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms or at all;
the occupancy levels, lease-up timing and rental rates may not meet our expectations;
even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, we may be unable to complete that acquisition after making a non-refundable deposit and incurring certain other acquisition-related costs;
competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price;
we may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other real estate investors, including publicly traded real estate investment trusts, institutional investment funds and private investors;
even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, it is subject to customary conditions to closing, including completion of due diligence investigations which may have findings that are unacceptable;
the timing of property acquisitions may lag the timing of property dispositions, leading to periods of time where projects' proceeds are not invested as profitably as we desire;
the acquired properties may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investments;
the actual returns realized on acquired properties may not exceed our cost of capital;
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations;
our estimates of capital expenditures required for an acquired property, including the costs of repositioning or redeveloping, may be inaccurate; and
we could experience a decline in value of the acquired assets after acquisition.
We may acquire properties subject to liabilities and without recourse, or with limited recourse with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if liability were asserted against us based upon the acquisition of a property, we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it,sooner than long-term leases, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Unknown liabilities with respectflow, results of operations and financial condition.
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to properties acquired might include:
liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination;
claims by tenants, vendors or other persons dealing withleave at the former ownersend of the properties;
liabilities incurredlease term without penalty, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market rents sooner than if our apartment leases were for longer terms. Additionally, if the ordinary courseterms of business;a renewal or reletting are less favorable than current terms, then our results of operations and
claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners financial condition could be negatively affected. For each of the properties.three years ended December 31, 2023, the same-store residential resident retention rate for each year's respective same-store community portfolio, was 63%, 63%, and 60%, respectively.
We face risks associated with third-party service providers, which could negatively impact our profitability.
We enter into arrangements from time to time by which various service providers conduct day-to-day property management and/or leasing activities at our properties. Failure of such service providers to adequately perform their contracted services could negatively impact our ability to retain tenants or lease vacant space. As a result, any such failure could negatively impact our profitability.
WeExpenses may not be able to control our operating expensesincrease or our operating expenses may remain constant or increase, even if our revenues do not increase, causing our financial condition, resultsdecrease.
The expense of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common sharesowning and ability to make distributions to our shareholders to be adversely affected.
Operating expenses associated with owningoperating a property include real estate taxes, insurance, loan payments maintenance, repair and renovation costs, the cost of compliance with governmental regulation (including zoning) and the potential for liability under applicable laws. If our operating expenses increase, our results of operations may be adversely affected. Moreover, operating expenses areis not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition or reduced occupancy cause a reduction in revenuesincome from the property.property or an increase in operating costs. As a result, if revenues decline,drop, we may not be able to reduce our operating expenses associated with the property.accordingly. Loan payments are an example of a cost that will not be reduced if our revenues decrease. If a property is mortgaged and we are unable to control or adjustmeet the mortgage payments, the lender could foreclose on the mortgage and take the property, resulting in a further reduction in revenues.
The risks related to our operating expenses accordingly,commercial operations could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations cash flow, per share trading priceand financial condition.
Although we are primarily in the residential rental business, we also own ancillary commercial space, primarily within our apartment communities, and own one office building that we lease to third parties. Gross rental revenue provided by leased commercial space in our portfolio represented 8% of our common sharesreal estate rental revenue from continuing operations in 2023. The long term nature of our commercial leases and characteristics of many of our tenants (generally small, local businesses) may subject us to certain risks, such as difficulties or delays in reletting this commercial space and in achieving desired rental rates, the cost of allowances and concessions to tenants, which may be less favorable than current terms, a failure rate of small, local business that may be higher than average and competition with other commercial spaces, which may affect our ability to make distributionslease space and the level of rents we can obtain. Additionally, if our commercial tenants experience financial distress or bankruptcy, they may fail to our shareholders may becomply with their contractual obligations, seek concessions in order to continue operations or cease their operations. Each of these factors could adversely affected.
Our real estate taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which could impact our cash flows.
Even though we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we are required to pay state and local taxes on our properties. The real property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially from what we have paid in the past. If the property taxes we pay increase, our financial condition, results of operations cash flows, per share market price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.financial condition.
Real estate investments are illiquid, and we may not be able to sell our properties on a timely basis when we determine it is appropriate to do so, which could negatively impact our profitability.
Real estate investments can be difficult to sell and convert to cash quickly, especially if market conditions are not favorable. Such illiquidity could limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio of properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Moreover, the REIT tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer property sales of properties that otherwise would be in our best interest. Due to these factors, we may be unable to sell a property at an advantageous time or on the terms anticipated which could negatively impact our profitability.
We face potential difficulties or delays renewing leases or re-leasing space which could impact our financial condition and ability to make distributions.
As of December 31, 2017, the percentage of leased square footage of our commercial properties will expire as set forth in the lease expiration tables on page 6.
Multifamily properties are leased under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less. For each the three years ended December 31, 2017, the multifamily tenant retention rate was 59%, 63% and 62%, respectively.
We derive substantially all of our income from rent received from tenants. If our tenants decide not to renew their leases, we may not be able to re-lease the space. If tenants decide to renew their leases, the terms of renewals, including the cost of required improvements or concessions, may be less favorable than current lease terms. If the rental rates of our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases (refer to the list of our ten largest tenants as of December 31, 2017 on page 7) or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available and soon-to-be-available space, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
We face potential adverse effects from major tenants' bankruptcies or insolvencies which could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely affect the income produced by a property. We cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. On the other hand, a court might authorize the tenant to reject and terminate its lease. In such case, our claim against the bankrupt tenant for unpaid, future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease. As a result, our claim for unpaid rent would likely not be paid in full. This shortfall could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. If a tenant experiences a downturn in its business or other types of financial distress, it may be unable to make timely rental payments.
We may suffer economic harm as a result of the actions of our partners in real estate joint ventures and other investments which may adversely affect our operations.
While we have no interests in joint ventures following our purchase of the remaining 10% interest in The Maxwell during the fourth quarter of 2017, we may from time to time invest in joint ventures in which we are not the exclusive investor or the only decision maker. Investments in such entities may involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that the other parties to these investments might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, and we may be forced to make contributions to maintain the value of the property. Our partners in these entities may have economic, tax or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Such investments may also lead to impasses, for example, as to whether to sell a property, because neither we nor the other parties to these investments may have full control over the entity. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of the other parties to these investments. Each of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In some instances, joint venture partners may have competing interests that could create conflicts of interest. These conflicts may include compliance with the REIT requirements, and our REIT status could be jeopardized if any of our joint ventures do not operate in compliance with the REIT requirements. To the extent our joint venture partners do not meet their obligations to us or they take action inconsistent with our interests in the joint venture, we may be adversely affected.
Our properties face significant competition which could adversely affect our ability to lease our properties and result in lower cash flows.
We face significant competition from developers, owners and operators of office, retail, multifamily and other commercial real estate. Substantially all of our properties face competition from similar properties in the same market. Such competition may affect our ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents we are able to charge. These competing properties may have vacancy rates higher than our properties, which may result in their owners being willing to make space available at lower rents than the space in our properties. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to lease our space, which would result in lower cash flows.
Increased affordability of residential homes and other competition for tenants of our multifamily properties could affect our ability to retain current residents of our multifamily properties, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our multifamily properties compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including owner occupied single and multifamily homes. Competitive housing in a particular area and increased affordability of owner occupied single and multifamily homes caused by lower housing prices, an influx of supply of such housing alternatives, attractive mortgage interest rates and government programs to promote home ownership could adversely affect our ability to retain our current residents, attract new ones or increase or maintain rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
A shift in retail shopping from brick and mortar stores to e-commerce and any resulting decrease in size or number of retail locations may have an adverse impact on our results of operations and our financial condition.
Our retail properties are typically grocery store-anchored neighborhood centers that include other small shop tenants or regional power centers with several junior box tenants. Many retailers operating brick and mortar stores have made and continue to make e-commerce sales an important piece of their business. This shift to e-commerce sales may result in a decrease in our retail tenants' sales causing those retailers to decrease the size or number of retail locations in the future. This shift could adversely impact our occupancy and rental rates, which would adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition.
We face risks associated with short-term liquid investments which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
We periodically may have cash balances that we invest in a variety of short-term investments that are intended to preserve principal value and maintain a high degree of liquidity while providing current income. From time to time, these investments may include (either directly or indirectly):
direct obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury;
obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies;
taxable municipal securities;
obligations (including certificates of deposit) of banks and thrifts;
commercial paper and other instruments consisting of short-term U.S. dollar denominated obligations issued by corporations and banks;
repurchase agreements collateralized by corporate and asset-backed obligations;
registered and unregistered money market funds; and
other highly-rated short-term securities.
Investments in these securities and funds are not insured against loss of principal. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to redeem all or part of our investment, and our right to redeem some or all of our investment may be delayed or suspended. In addition, there is no guarantee that our investments in these securities or funds will be redeemable at par value. A decline in the value of our investment or a delay or suspension of our right to redeem may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other laws and regulations could result in substantial costs and adversely affect our results of operations.
The Americans with Disabilities Act generally requires that public buildings, including commercial and multifamily properties, be made accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in imposition of fines by the federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. If, pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect our results of operations.
We may also incur significant costs complying with other regulations. Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fair housing, rent control and fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we may incur fines or private damage awards. We believe that our properties are currently in material compliance with regulatory requirements. However, we do not know whether existing requirements will change in the future or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely affect our results of operations.
Some potential losses are not covered by insurance, which could adversely affect our financial condition or cash flow.
We carry insurance coverage on our properties of types and in amounts that we believe are in line with coverage customarily obtained by owners of similar properties. We believe all of our properties are adequately insured. The property insurance that we maintain for our properties has historically been on an “all risk” basis, which is in full force and effect until renewal in August 2018. There are other types of losses, such as from wars or catastrophic events, for which we cannot obtain insurance at all or at a reasonable cost.
We have an insurance policy that has no terrorism exclusion, except for non-certified nuclear, chemical and biological acts of terrorism. Our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts. Effective November 26, 2002, under this existing coverage, any losses caused
by certified acts of terrorism would be partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula established by federal law. Under this formula, the United States pays 85% of covered terrorism losses exceeding the statutorily established deductible paid by the insurance provider, and insurers pay 10% until aggregate insured losses from all insurers reach $100 billion in a calendar year. If the aggregate amount of insured losses under this program exceeds $100 billion during the applicable period for all insured and insurers combined, then each insurance provider will not be liable for payment of any amount which exceeds the aggregate amount of $100 billion. On January 12, 2015, The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 was signed into law, extending the program through December 31, 2020. We continue to monitor the state of the insurance market in general, and the scope and costs of coverage for acts of terrorism in particular, but we cannot anticipate what amount of coverage will be available on commercially reasonable terms in future policy years.
In the event of an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance limits, we could lose both the revenues generated from the affected property and the capital we have invested in the affected property. Depending on the specific circumstances of the affected property it is possible that we could be liable for any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could adversely affect our business and financial condition and results of operations.
In most cases, we have to renew our policies on an annual basis and negotiate acceptable terms for coverage, exposing us to the volatility of the insurance markets, including the possibility of rate increases. Any material increase in insurance rates or decrease in available coverage in the future could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. Such losses may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such projects. Any such uninsured loss would adversely affect our cash flow.
Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.
All of the properties in our portfolio are located in or near Washington, DC, a metropolitan area that has been and may in the future be the target of actual or threatened terrorism attacks. As a result, some tenants in our market may choose to relocate their businesses to other markets. This could result in an overall decrease in the demand for commercial space in this market generally, which could increase vacancies in our properties or necessitate that we lease our properties on less favorable terms, or both. In addition, future terrorist attacks in or near Washington, DC could directly or indirectly damage such properties, both physically and financially, or cause losses that materially exceed our insurance coverage. As a result of the foregoing, our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties could decline materially which would negatively affect our results of operations.
Potential liability for environmental matters could result in substantial costs, which would reduce the cash available for our operations and for distributions to our shareholders.
Under U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or release of hazardous or toxic substances, wastes or petroleum products at our properties, including investigation or cleanup costs, personal or property damage, natural resource damages, or we may be required to pay for such costs and damages incurred by a government entity or third party regardless of our knowledge or responsibility, simply because of our current or past ownership or operation of the real estate. If environmental contamination issues arise, we may have to make substantial payments, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders, because (1) as a current or former owner or operator of real property we may have to pay for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred in connection with the contamination; (2) the law typically imposes clean-up responsibility and liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the contamination; (3) even if more than one person may be responsible for the contamination, each person who shares legal liability under such environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs; and (4) governmental entities and third parties may sue the owner or operator of a contaminated site for damages and costs. We also may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances or waste at disposal or treatment facilities if we arranged for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at such facilities, whether or not we own such facility.
In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and other state and local governmental authorities are increasingly imposing indoor air quality standards, especially with respect to asbestos, mold, and lead-based paint. The clean up or abatement of any of these environmental conditions, including for asbestos and mold, can be costly. For example, laws applicable to buildings containing certain asbestos-containing materials (“ACM”) impose multiple requirements, including:
properly managing and maintaining the ACM;
notifying and training those who may come into contact with the ACM; and
undertaking special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if the ACM would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building.
Such laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to asbestos fibers.
Inquiries about indoor air quality may necessitate special investigation and, depending on the results, remediation beyond our regular indoor air quality testing and maintenance programs. Indoor air quality issues can stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contaminants from indoor or outdoor sources, and biological contaminants such as molds, pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to chemical or biological contaminants above certain levels can be alleged to be connected to allergic reactions or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. If these conditions were to occur at one of our properties, we may be subject to third-party claims for personal injury, or may need to undertake a targeted remediation program, including without limitation, steps to increase indoor ventilation rates and eliminate sources of contaminants. Such remediation programs could be costly, necessitate the temporary relocation of some or all of the property’s tenants or require rehabilitation of the affected property.
The costs associated with these issues could be substantial and, in extreme cases, could exceed the value of the contaminated property. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products or the failure to properly remediate contamination may adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property. In addition, applicable environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with a contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may result in substantial expenditures or liabilities.
It is our policy to retain independent environmental consultants to conduct Phase I environmental site assessments and asbestos surveys with respect to our acquisition of properties. These assessments generally include a visual inspection of the properties and the surrounding areas, an examination of current and historical uses of the properties and the surrounding areas and a review of relevant state, federal and historical documents. However, they do not always involve invasive techniques such as soil and ground water sampling. When appropriate, on a property-by-property basis, our general practice is to have these consultants conduct additional testing. However, even though these additional assessments may be conducted, there is still the risk that:
the environmental assessments and updates did not identify all potential environmental liabilities;
a prior owner created a material environmental condition that is not known to us or the independent consultants preparing the assessments;
new environmental liabilities have developed since the environmental assessments were conducted; and
future uses or conditions or changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations could result in environmental liability to us.
In addition, our properties are subject to various U.S. federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety regulatory requirements that address a wide variety of issues. Noncompliance with these environmental and health and safety laws and regulations could subject us or our tenants to liability, including significant fines or penalties. These liabilities could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us. Moreover, changes in laws could increase the potential costs of compliance with such laws and regulations or increase liability for noncompliance. This may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise adversely affect our operations, or those of our tenants, which could in turn have an adverse effect on us.
We cannot assure you that costs or liabilities incurred as a result of environmental issues will not affect our ability to make distributions to our shareholders or that such costs, liabilities or other remedial measures will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions, or otherwise, which could materially harm our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common shares.
We face risks associated with security breaches or disruptions, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to emails, or persons inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. In the normal course of business we and our service providers (including service providers engaged in providing property management, leasing, accounting and/or payroll services) collect and retain certain personal information provided by our tenants, employees and vendors. We also rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage our business. While
we and our service providers employ a variety of data security measures to protect confidential information on our systems and periodically review and improve our data security measures, we cannot assure that we or our service providers will be able to prevent unauthorized access to this personal information. There can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of the information we and our service providers collect and our and their computer systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted security breaches evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, we and our service providers may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is impossible for us and our service providers to entirely mitigate this risk. A security breach or other significant disruption involving computer networks and related systems could adversely impact our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common shares.
We are subject to risks from natural disasters and severe weather which could increase our operating costs and reduce our cash flow.
Natural disasters and severe weather such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods or blizzards may result in significant damage to our properties. The extent of our casualty losses and loss in operating income in connection with such events is a function of the severity of the event and the total amount of exposure in the affected area. Because the properties in our portfolio are concentrated in a single region, a single catastrophe or destructive weather event may have a significant negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations. As a result, our operating and financial results may vary significantly from one period to the next. We are also exposed to risks associated with inclement winter weather, including increased need for maintenance and repair of our buildings. In addition, climate change, to the extent it causes changes in weather patterns, could have effects on our business by increasing the cost of property insurance, energy and/or snow removal at our properties. As a result, the consequences of natural disasters, severe weather and climate change could increase our costs and reduce our cash flow.
We may experience a decline in the fair value of our assets, which may have a material impact on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations and adversely impact the market value of our securities.
A decline in the fair market value of our assets may require us to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment against such assets under GAAP if we were to determine that we do not have the ability and intent to hold any assets in unrealized loss positions to maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery to the amortized cost of such assets. In such event, we would recognize unrealized losses through earnings and write down the amortized cost of such assets to a new cost basis, based on the fair value of such assets on the date they are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired. Such impairment charges reflect non-cash losses at the time of recognition. Subsequent disposition or sale of such assets could further affect our future losses or gains, as they are based on the difference between the sale price received and adjusted amortized cost of such assets at the time of sale, which may adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. In addition, a significant economic downturn over a period of time could result in an event or change in circumstances that results in an impairment in the value of our properties or our investments in joint ventures. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable over its expected holding period and exceeds its fair value. There can be no assurance that we will not take charges in the future related to the impairment of our assets or investments. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Rent control or rent stabilization legislation and other regulatory restrictions may limit our ability to increase rents and pass through new or increased operating costs to our tenants.residents.
Certain states and municipalities, including Washington, DC,Jurisdictions in which we own property have adopted, or may in the future adopt, laws and regulations imposing restrictions on the timing or amount of rent increases or have imposed regulations relating to low- and moderate-income housing. Such laws and regulations limit our ability to charge market rents, increase rents or evict tenants or recover increases inresidents at our operating expensesapartment communities and could make it more difficult for us to dispose of properties in certain circumstances. Similarly, compliance procedures associated with rent control statutes and low- and moderate-income housing regulations could have a negative impact on our operating costs, and any failure to comply with low- and moderate-income housing regulations could result in the loss of certain tax benefits and the forfeiture of rent payments. In addition, such low- and moderate-income housing regulations often require us to rent a certain number of unitshomes at below-market rents, which has a negative impact on our ability to increase cash flows from our residential properties subject to such regulations. Furthermore, such regulations may negatively impact our ability to attract higher-paying tenantsresidents to such properties. As of December 31, 2023, four of our residential properties, each located within the Washington, DC metro region, were subject to such regulations.
Our business and reputation depend on our ability to continue to provide high quality housing and consistent operation of our communities, the failure of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and reputation depend on providing our residents with quality housing including a wide variety of amenities such
as covered parking, swimming pools, fitness facilities and similar features, highly reliable services, including water and electric power and the consistent operation of our communities. The delayed delivery or any material reduction or prolonged interruption of these services may cause residents to terminate their leases or may result in a reduction of rents and/or increase in our costs or other issues. In addition, we may fail to provide quality housing and continuous access to amenities, including as a result of government mandated closures due to health concerns, mechanical failure, power outage, human error, vandalism, physical or electronic security breaches, war, terrorism and similar events. Such service interruptions, closures, mechanical failures or other events may also expose us to additional liability claims and damage our reputation and brand and could cause current residents to terminate or not renew their leases, and prospective residents to seek housing elsewhere. Any such failures could impair our ability to continue providing quality housing and consistent operation of our communities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks associated with property development/redevelopment, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
We may, from time to time, engage in development and redevelopment activities, some of which may be significant. Developing or redeveloping properties presents a number of risks for us, including risks relating to necessary permitting, risks relating to development and construction costs and/or permanent financing, environmental remediation, timeline disruptions and demand for the completed property.
Properties developed or acquired for development may generate little or no cash flow from the date of acquisition through the date of completion of development and commencement of leasing activity. In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are dependentultimately successful, may require a substantial portion of management’s time and attention.
These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken. Some of these development/redevelopment risks may be heightened given uncertain and potentially volatile market conditions. If market volatility causes economic conditions to remain unpredictable or to trend downwards, we may not achieve our expected returns on key personnelproperties we develop and we could lose some or all of our investments in those properties. In addition, the lead time required to develop, construct, and lease-up a development property may increase, which could adversely impact our projected returns or result in a termination of the development project. The materialization of any of the foregoing risks could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.
Corporate social responsibility, specifically related to ESG matters, may constrain our business operations, impose additional costs and expose us to new risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition and the lossprice of our securities.
Environmental, social and governance matters have become increasingly important to investors and other stakeholders. Certain organizations that provide corporate risk and corporate governance advisory services to investors have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies based upon ESG metrics. Many investors focus on ESG-related business practices and scores when choosing where to allocate their investments and may consider a company’s score as a factor in making an investment decision. The focus and activism related to ESG and related matters may constrain our business operations or increase expenses. Additionally, if our corporate responsibility procedures or standards do not meet the standards set by various constituencies, we may face reputational damage. There can be no assurance of how we will score on the ESG metrics used by such advisory organizations in the future, particularly since the criteria by which companies are rated for their ESG efforts may change. A low ESG score could result in a negative perception of the Company, exclusion of our securities from consideration by certain investors and/or cause investors to reallocate their capital away from the Company, each of which could have an adverse impact on the price of our securities.
As we continue to invest and focus on ESG efforts and initiatives that we believe are appropriate for the Company and our shareholders, we could also be criticized by ESG detractors for the scope or nature of our ESG initiatives or goals. We could also be subjected to negative responses by governmental actors (such as anti-ESG legislation or retaliatory legislative treatment), tenants and residents, that could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
We face risks associated with property acquisitions.
We may acquire properties and expand into new markets which would increase our size and geographic diversity and could alter our capital structure. In addition, our acquisition activities and results may be exposed to the following risks:
•we may have difficulty finding properties that are consistent with our strategies and meet our standards;
•we may be unable to finance acquisitions on favorable terms or at all;
•the occupancy levels, lease-up timing and rental rates of acquired properties may not meet our expectations;
•even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for a property, we may be unable to complete that acquisition after making a non-refundable deposit and incurring certain other acquisition-related costs;
•we may be unable to acquire a desired property at all or at the desired purchase price because of competition from other real estate investors, including publicly traded real estate investment trusts, institutional investment funds and private investors;
•the timing of property acquisitions may lag the timing of property dispositions, leading to periods of time where projects’ proceeds are not invested as profitably as we desire;
•we may fail to secure required zoning, occupancy or other governmental permits and authorizations or applicable zoning and land use laws may change;
•we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations;
•new acquisitions and developments may fail to perform as expected or we may underestimate costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to our standards;
•we may assume liabilities for undisclosed environmental contamination;
•our estimates of capital expenditures required for an acquired property, including the costs of repositioning or redeveloping, may be inaccurate and the acquired properties may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investments; and
•we could experience a decline in value of the acquired assets after acquisition.
In addition, our financing of an acquisition could negatively impact our cash flows and liquidity, require us to incur substantial debt or involve the issuance of new equity, which would be dilutive to existing stockholders. We may also acquire properties subject to liabilities and without recourse, or with limited recourse with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if liability were asserted against us based upon the acquisition of a property, we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow.
We may suffer economic harm as a result of the actions of our partners in real estate joint ventures and other investments which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We may from time to time invest in joint ventures in which we are not the exclusive investor or the only decision maker. Investments in such entities may involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that the other parties to these investments may have business interest or goals that are inconsistent with our own, including for example, whether to sell or retain joint venture properties or interests, become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. In some instances, joint venture partners may have competing interests that could create conflicts of interest, including compliance with the REIT requirements, and our REIT status could be jeopardized if any of our future joint ventures do not operate in compliance with the REIT requirements. To the extent our joint venture partners do not meet their obligations to us or they act inconsistent with our interests in the joint venture, we may be adversely affected.
Climate change and regulation regarding climate change in the regions in which we operate may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, per share market price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.
Climate change (including rising sea levels, flooding, prolonged periods of extreme temperature or other extreme weather, and changes in precipitation and temperature), may result in physical damage to, a decrease in demand for and/or a decrease in rent from and value of our properties located in the areas affected by these conditions (particularly in areas closer to coasts). Additionally, our insurance premiums may increase as a result of the threat of climate change or the effects of climate change may not be covered by our insurance policies.
Changes in U.S. federal and state legislation and regulations on climate change could result in utility expenses and/or capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties or other related aspects of our properties in order to comply with such regulations or otherwise adapt to climate change. The U.S. government and various state agencies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to the potential impact of climate change, including legislation regarding green-house gas emissions and renewable energy targets. Any such regulation regarding climate change may require unplanned capital improvements and increased engagement by our employees. Any adopted future climate change regulations could negatively impact our ability to compete with companies not subject to such regulations. From a medium and long-term perspective, as a result of these regulatory initiatives, we may see an increase in costs relating to any owned or future properties and failure to meet certain performance standards could result in fines for non-compliance, a decrease in demand and a decline in the value of our properties. As a result of these and other regulations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, per share market price of our common shares and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
Actual or threatened acts of violence, including terrorist attacks, may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.
Actual or threatened acts of violence, including terrorist attacks and increased crime rates, resulting in more safety and security incidents, could occur in the localities in which we conduct business. As a result, some residents in our markets may choose to relocate to other markets. This could result in an overall decrease in the demand for such markets generally, which could increase vacancies or impact rental rates in our properties. In addition, future acts of violence or terrorist attacks could directly or indirectly damage our properties, both physically and financially, or cause losses that materially exceed our insurance coverage. As a result of the foregoing, our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties could decline materially which would negatively affect our results of operations.
Some potential losses are not covered by insurance, which could adversely affect our financial condition or cash flow.
The property insurance that we maintain for our properties has historically been on an “all risk” basis, which is in full force and effect until renewal in August 2024. There are other types of losses, such as from wars or catastrophic events, for which we cannot obtain insurance at all or at a reasonable cost.
Our insurance does not cover terrorist related activities except certain non-certified nuclear, chemical and biological acts of terrorism. Our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts.
Property ownership also involves potential liability to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring on the property. Such losses may not be fully insured. Furthermore, losses related to other types of risk, such as cybersecurity incidents or climate change may not be fully insured. In addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations could adversely affect the viability of such personnelprojects. Any such uninsured loss could adversely affect our financial condition or cash flow.
In the event of an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance limits, we could lose both the revenues generated from the affected property and the capital we have invested in the affected property. Depending on the specific circumstances of the affected property, it is possible that we could be liable for any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could adversely affect our business and financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, any material increase in insurance rates or decrease in available coverage in the future could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
The executionCompliance with certain federal, state and local laws and regulations could adversely affect our results of operation, and may cause us to incur substantial costs or subject us to potential liabilities.
We are subject to certain compliance costs and potential liabilities under various U.S. federal, state and local environmental, employment, health, safety and zoning laws and regulations that govern our and our tenants’ operations. If we fail to comply with such laws, including if we fail to obtain any required permits or licenses, we could face substantial fines or possible revocation of our investment strategyauthority to conduct some of our operations.
Some of our current or former properties have had tenants that used hazardous substances or petroleum in the course of their businesses. Various environmental laws impose liability on a current or former owner or operator of real property for investigation or cleanup of hazardous substances or petroleum products at, on, under or migrating from our currently or formerly owned or leased real property, regardless of whether or not we knew of, or caused, the presence or release of such substances or products. Liability under these laws may be joint and managementseveral, meaning that we could be required to bear 100% of the liability even if other parties are also liable. From time to time, we may be required to investigate and clean-up hazardous substances or petroleum products or remove, abate or manage asbestos, mold, radon gas, lead or other hazardous conditions at our properties, and the costs of those effort may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property and/or our aggregate assets. The presence or release of such hazardous substances or petroleum products at our currently owned or leased properties could result in limitations on or interruptions to our operations, or may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such properties or borrow using such properties as collateral. Releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products at our currently or formerly owned or leased properties could result in third-party claims for bodily injury, property or natural resource damages, or other losses, including liens in favor of the government for costs the government incurs in cleaning up contamination. In addition, we may be liable for the costs of investigating or remediating contamination at off-site waste disposal facilities to which we have arranged for the disposal, or treatment of hazardous substances without regard to whether we complied with environmental laws in doing so. It is our policy to retain independent environmental consultants to conduct Phase I environmental site assessments and asbestos surveys prior to our acquisition of properties. However, there is a risk that these
assessments will not identify all potential environmental issues at a given property. Moreover, environmental, health and safety requirements have become increasingly stringent, and our costs may increase as a result. New or revised laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, such as those related to climate change, could affect the operation of our properties or result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on our properties or adversely affect our ability to sell properties or to use properties as collateral.
We may also incur significant costs complying with other regulations. In addition, failure of our properties to comply with the ADA could result in injunctive relief, fines, an award of damages to private litigants or mandated capital expenditures to remedy such noncompliance. Any imposition of injunctive relief, fines, damage awards or capital expenditures could adversely impact our business or results of operations. Our properties are subject to various other federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fair housing, rent control and fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the ADA or other federal, state and local regulations, we could be subject to fines, penalties, injunctive action, reputational harm and other business effects which could materially and negatively affect our performance and results of operations.
In addition, existing laws could be interpreted in a manner that restricts our ability to use systems that we currently use in our operations and we may face litigation or regulatory risk in connection with such laws. Future compliance with new laws of general applicability, laws applicable to companies in our industry, or laws applicable to public companies generally could increase our costs and could have an adverse effect on our financial performance.For example, one of our vendors, RealPage, is currently involved in lawsuits alleging that RealPage and others conspired to artificially inflate the prices of multifamily residential real estate above competitive levels.
We face cybersecurity risks which have the potential to disrupt our operations, cause material harm to our financial condition, result in misappropriation of assets, compromise confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and we can provide no assurance that the steps we and our service providers take in response to these risks will be effective.
We are dependent on our information technology networks and systems to access, as well as those of third parties, to process, transmit and store proprietary and confidential information, including personal information of residents, employees, and vendors. We face cybersecurity threats, including system, network or internet failures, cyber-attacks, ransomware and other malware, social engineering, phishing schemes and workforce member error, negligence, or fraud. The risk of a cyber-attack, including by computer hackers, nation-state affiliated actors and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks around the world have increased. Any such cybersecurity incident, including those impacting personal information, may result in disruption of our operations, dependmaterial harm to our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common shares, misappropriation of assets, compromise or corruption of confidential information collected in the course of conducting our business, liability for impacted information or assets, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, regulatory scrutiny or enforcement, litigation and damage to our stakeholder relationships. A cybersecurity incident could also interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting requirements. Additionally, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and threats, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate companies into our information technology environment and security program. In addition, increased regulation of data collection, use and retention practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, changes in existing laws and regulations, enactment of new laws and regulations, increased enforcement activity, and changes in interpretation of laws, could increase our cost of compliance and operation, limit our ability to grow our business or otherwise harm the Company.
We also rely on third-party service providers in our conduct of our business, and we can provide no assurance that the security measures of those providers will be effective. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their security-related obligations to us, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award.
Although we and our third-party service providers make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our information, including the implementation of security measures, required employee awareness training and the existence of a significant degreedisaster recovery plan, we can provide no assurance that our data security measures will be able to detect or prevent all cybersecurity incidents. These risks require increasing resources from us to analyze and mitigate, and there is no assurance that our efforts will be effective. Additionally, as a result of the internalization of community management services for our properties, which was completed in 2023, we collect and retain greater amounts of personal information, both from employees and current and potential residents, which increases the risks and potential effects of such a cybersecurity incident.
We have identified and expect to continue to identify cyberattacks and cybersecurity incidents on our senior management team. Ifsystems and those of third parties, but none of the cyberattacks and incidents we have identified to date has had a material impact on our business or operations.
While we have purchased cybersecurity insurance, there are no assurances that the coverage would be adequate in relation to any incurred losses. Moreover, as cyber-attacks increase in frequency and magnitude, we may be unable to attractobtain cybersecurity insurance in amounts and retain skilled executives,on terms we view as adequate for our operations.
A pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial conditioncondition.
A pandemic and emergence of new variants could be adversely affected.(as the outbreak of COVID-19 did) negatively impact the global economy, disrupt financial markets and international trade, and result in varying unemployment levels, all of which could negatively impact the multifamily industry and our business. Pandemic outbreakscould lead (and the outbreak of COVID-19 led) governments and other authorities around the world, including federal, state and local authorities in the United States, to impose measures intended to mitigate its spread, including restrictions on freedom of movement and business operations such as orders not allowing the collection of rents, rent increases, or eviction of non-paying residents and tenants.
The impact of an ongoing pandemic and measures to prevent its spread could (and the outbreak of COVID-19 did) negatively impact our businesses in a number of ways, including shifts in consumer housing demand, our residents’ ability or willingness to pay rents and the demand for multifamily communities within the markets we operate. Unanticipated costs and operating expenses and decreased anticipated and actual revenue related to compliance with regulations could negatively impact our future compliance with financial covenants of debt agreements and our ability to satisfy certain REIT-related requirements.
Risks Related to Financing
Rising interest rates would increase our interest costs and negatively impact our cash flow.
We have and may continue to incur indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates. As a result, an increase in interest rates will increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service debt. As a protection against rising interest rates, we may enter into agreements such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate exchange contracts. These agreements, however, increase our risks including other parties to the agreements not performing or that the agreements may be unenforceable.
We face risks associated with the use of debt, including refinancing risk.
We rely on borrowings under our credit facility, term loan, mortgage notes, and may rely on offerings of debt securities to finance acquisitions and development activities and for general corporate purposes. In the past, the commercial real estate debt markets have experienced significant volatility due to a number of factors, including the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies and the reported significant inventory of unsold mortgage-backed securities in the market. Thediminished market sentiment and prices with respect to certain asset classes. This volatility resulted in investors decreasing the availability of debt financing as well as increasing the cost of debt financing. These conditions, which increase the cost and reduce availability of debt, may continue to worsen in the future. Circumstances could again arise in which we may not be able to obtain debt financing in the future on favorable terms, or at all. If we wereare unable to borrow under our credit facility, obtain new debt financing or to refinance existing debt, financing, our financial condition and results of operations would likely be adversely affected. Similarly, global equity markets have experienced significant price volatility and liquidity disruptions in recent years, and similar circumstances could significantly and negatively impact liquidity in the financial market in the future. Any disruption could negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all.
We are subject to the risks normally associated with debt, including the risk that our cash flow may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. We anticipate that only a small portion of the principal of our currently outstanding debt, if any, will be repaid prior to maturity. Therefore, we are likely to need to refinance a significant portion of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or repaid with proceeds from other sources, such as new equity capital, our cash flow may not be sufficient to repay all maturing debt in years when significant “balloon” payments come due. In addition, we may rely on debt to fund a portion of our new investments such as our acquisition and development activity. There is a risk that we may be unable to finance these activities on favorable terms or at all. These conditions, which increase the cost and reduce the availabilityThe materialization of debt, may continue or worsen in the future. If any of thesethe foregoing risks were to happen, it would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our degree of leverage could limit our ability to obtain additional financing, affect the market price of our common shares or debt securities or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.
On February 15, 2018,13, 2024, our total consolidated debt was approximately $1.3$0.7 billion. Consolidated debt to consolidated market capitalization ratio, which measures total consolidated debt as a percentage of the aggregate of total consolidated debt plus the market value of outstanding equity securities, is often used by analysts to assess leverage for equity REITs such as us. Our market value is calculated using the price per share of our common shares. Using the closing share price of $26.57$14.13 per share of our common shares on February 15, 2018,13, 2024, multiplied by the number of our common shares, our consolidated debt to total consolidated market capitalization ratio was approximately 39%36% as of February 15, 2018.13, 2024.
Our degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes. Our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by two major rating agencies. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain this rating, and in the event our senior debt is downgraded from its current rating, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and/or difficulty in obtaining additional financing. Our degree of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally. There is a risk that changes in our debt to market capitalization ratio, which is in part a function of our share price, or our ratio of indebtedness to other measures of asset value used by financial analysts, may have an adverse effect on the market price of our equity or debt securities.
PaymentsAdditionally, payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our properties, fully implement our capital expenditure, acquisition and redevelopment activities, or meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code. Our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following:
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of principal, and interest on, indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes;
make it more difficult for us to borrow additional funds as needed or on favorable terms, which could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to meet operational needs;
restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, developing properties or exploiting business opportunities;
force us to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on unfavorable terms (including the possible application of the 100% tax on income from prohibited transactions or in violation of certain covenants to which we may be subject);
subject us to increased sensitivity to interest rate increases;
make us more vulnerable to economic downturns, adverse industry conditions or catastrophic external events;
limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures;
limit our ability to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;
reduce our flexibility in planning for or responding to changing business, industry and economic conditions; and/or
place us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors that have relatively less debt than we have.
If any one of these events were to occur, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and market price of our common shares could be adversely affected.
Rising interest rates would increase our interest costs which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to pay distributions.
We incur indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates. Accordingly, if interest rates increase, so will our interest costs, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service debt. As a protection against rising interest rates, we may enter into agreements such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate exchange contracts. These agreements, however, increase our risks that other parties to the agreements may not perform or that the agreements may be unenforceable. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts third-parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
Mortgage debt obligations expose us to the possibility of foreclosure, which could result in the loss of our investment in a property or group of properties subject to mortgage debt.
Incurring mortgage and other secured debt obligations increases our risk of property losses because defaults on indebtedness secured by properties may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and ultimately our loss of the property securing any loans for which we are in default. Any foreclosure on a mortgaged property or group of properties could adversely affect the overall value of our portfolio of properties (or portions thereof). For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties that is subject to a nonrecourse mortgage loan generally would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds, which could hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirements applicable to REITs under the Code.
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain financing or have other adverse effects on us or the market price of our common shares.
In recent years, the United States and global equity and credit markets have experienced significant price volatility and liquidity disruptions which caused the market prices of shares to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances significantly and negatively impacted liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive or unavailable. Any disruption in the equity and credit markets could negatively impact our ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all. If such disruption were to occur, in the event of a debt financing, our cost of borrowing in the future would likely be significantly higher than historical levels. Additionally, in the case of a common equity financing, the disruptions in the financial markets could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common shares, potentially requiring us to issue more shares than we would otherwise have issued with a higher market value for our common shares. Disruption in the financial markets also could negatively affect our ability to make acquisitions, undertake new development projects and refinance our debt. In addition, it could also make it more difficult for us to sell properties and could adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers experience increased costs of financing and difficulties in obtaining financing. If economic conditions deteriorate, the ability of lenders to fulfill their obligations under working capital or other credit facilities that we may have in the future may be adversely impacted.
Disruptions in the financial markets also could adversely affect many of our tenants and their businesses, including their ability to pay rents when due and renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates. As well, our ability to attract prospective new tenants in the future could be adversely affected by disruption in the financial markets. Each of these disruptions could have adverse effects on us or the market price of our common shares.
Covenants in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our credit facility contains customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness. We must maintain certain ratios, including a maximum of total indebtedness to total asset value, a maximum of secured indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum of quarterly adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges, a minimum net operating income from unencumbered properties to unsecured interest expense and a maximum of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value. Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is subject to compliance with our financial and other covenants.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured credit facility or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. In particular, we could suffer a default under one of our secured debt instruments that could exceed a cross-default threshold under our unsecured credit facility, causing an event of default under the unsecured credit facility. Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us or be available only on unattractive terms. In addition, if we breach covenants in our debt agreements, the lenders can declare a default and, if the debt is secured, take possession of the property securing the defaulted loan.
Alternatively, even if a secured debt instrument is below the cross-default threshold for non-recourse secured debt under our unsecured credit facility, a default under such secured debt instrument may still cause a cross default under our unsecured credit facility because such secured debt instrument may not qualify as “non-recourse” under the definition in our unsecured credit facility. Another possible cross default could occur between our unsecured credit facility and any senior unsecured notes that we issue. Any of the foregoing default or cross-default events could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and/or prohibit future borrowings, either of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share market price of our common shares and ability to make distributions to our shareholders.shareholders and agreements we enter into to protect us from rising interest rates expose us to counterparty risk.
We have entered into, and may in the future enter into, hedging transactions to protect ourselves from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on floatingvariable rate debt. Our hedging transactions have included, and may in the future include, entering into agreements such as interest rate cap agreements orswaps, caps, floors and other interest rate swap agreements.exchange contracts. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that such arrangements would not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes or that a court could rule that such an agreement is not legally enforceable. In addition, interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common shares and ability to make distributions to our shareholders. In addition, whileWhile such agreements would beare intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they could also expose us to the risk that the other parties to the agreements would not perform, and that the hedging arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code imposemay limit use of certain restrictions onhedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous or push us to implement those hedges through a taxable REIT subsidiary, which would increase the cost of our ability to utilize hedges, swaps and other types of derivatives to hedge our liabilities.hedging activities. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"(“ASC”) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. Should we desire to terminate a hedging agreement, there could be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligation under the hedging agreement.
Loans under our credit facility and term loan agreement may bear interest based on SOFR, but experience with SOFR based loans is limited.
Our credit facility and term loan agreement requires the applicable interest rate or payment amount by reference to SOFR (“Secured Overnight Financing Rate”). The use of SOFR based rates may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than the rates and payments that we previously experienced under USD-LIBOR. In addition, the use of SOFR based rates is relatively new, and there could be unanticipated difficulties or disruptions with the calculation and publication of SOFR based rates that could hinder our ability to establish effective hedges and result in a different economic value over time for these instruments than they otherwise would have had under USD-LIBOR. In particular, if the agent under our credit facility or under our term loan agreement determines that SOFR based rates cannot be determined or the applicable agent or lenders determine that SOFR based rates do not adequately reflect the cost of funding, outstanding SOFR based loans may be converted into base rate loans, which could result in increased borrowing costs.
Covenants in our debt agreements could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our credit facility and other debt instruments contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness. We must maintain certain ratios, including a maximum of total indebtedness to total asset value, a maximum of secured indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum of quarterly adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges and a maximum of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered pool value. Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is subject to compliance with our financial and other covenants.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured credit facility or other debt instruments (including our indenture, term loan agreement and our notes purchase agreement) could result in a default under one or more of our debt instruments. If we fail to comply with the covenants in our unsecured credit facility or other debt instruments, other sources of capital may not be available to us or be available only on unattractive terms. In addition, if we breach covenants in our debt agreements, the lenders can declare a default and, if the debt is secured, take possession of the property securing the defaulted loan.
Any default or cross-default events could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and/or prohibit future borrowings, either of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Our charterdeclaration of trust and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change in control of Washington REIT,Elme Communities, even if such a change in control may be in the best interest of our shareholders, and as a result may depress the market price of our common shares.
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law ("MGCL"(“MGCL”) may limit a change in control which could prevent holders of our common shares from profiting as a result of such change in control. These provisions include:
•a provision where a corporation is not permitted to engage in any business combination with any “interested stockholder,” defined as any holder or affiliate of any holder of 10% or more of the corporation’s stock, for a period of five years after that holder becomes an “interested stockholder,” and
•a provision where the voting rights of “control shares” acquired in a “control share acquisition,” as defined in the MGCL, may be restricted, such that the “control shares” have no voting rights, except to the extent approved by a vote of holders of two-thirds of the common shares entitled to vote on the matter.
Additionally, we are subject to the “business combination” and “unsolicited takeover” provisions of the MGCL. These provisions may delay, defer, or prevent a transaction or a change in control that may involve a premium price for holders of our shares or
otherwise be in their best interests. Our bylaws currently provide that the foregoing provision regarding "control“control share acquisitions"acquisitions” will not apply to Washington REIT. However, our boardany acquisition by any person of trustees could,shares of beneficial interest of Elme Communities. There can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future modifyby our Board and may be amended or eliminated with retroactive effect.
Additionally, Title 8, Subtitle 3 of the MGCL permits our Board, without shareholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our declaration of trust or bylaws, suchto implement certain takeover defenses. These provisions may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us under the circumstances that otherwise could provide our common shareholders with the foregoing provision regarding "control share acquisitions" would be applicableopportunity to Washington REIT.realize a premium over the then current market price.
The stockshare ownership limits imposed by the Code for REITs and imposed by our charterdeclaration of trust may restrict our business combination opportunities that might involve a premium price for our common shares or otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
InThe ownership of our shares must be restricted in several ways in order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in valueCode. Our declaration of our outstanding equity shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year following our first year. Our charter authorizes our board of trustees to take the actions that are necessary or appropriate to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Our chartertrust provides that no person (other than an excepted holder, as defined in our charter)declaration of trust) may actually or constructively own more than 9.8% of the aggregate of our outstanding common shares by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, or 9.8% of the aggregate of the outstandingequity shares of all classes and series ("equity shares") by value.
Our boardBoard has the authority under our declaration of trusteestrust to reduce these share ownership limits. Our Board may, in its sole discretion, grant exemptions to the share ownership limits, subject to such conditions and the receipt by our board of trusteesBoard of certain representations and undertakings. In addition,undertakings to ensure that our board of trustees has the authority under our charter to reduce these share ownership limits.
REIT qualification is not adversely affected. In addition to the9.8% (or any lower future percentage) share ownership limits, discussed above, our charterdeclaration of trust also prohibits any person from (a) beneficially or constructively owning, as determined by applying certain attribution rules of the Code, our equity shares that would result in us being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code (regardless of whether the interest is held during the last half of a taxable year) or that would otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT, or (b) transferring equity shares if such transfer would result in our equity shares being owned by fewer than 100 persons.
The share ownership limits contained in our charterdeclaration of trust are based on the ownership at any time by any “person,” which term includes entities and certain groups. The share ownership limitations in our charterdeclaration of trust are common in REIT charters and are intended to provide added assurance of compliance with the tax law requirements, and to minimize administrative burdens.requirements. However, the share ownership limits on our shares alsoand our enforcement of them might delay, defer, prevent, or otherwise inhibit a transaction or a
change in control of Washington REITElme Communities, including a transaction that might involve a premium price for our common shares or that might otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders.
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our trustees and officers are limited, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions that you do not believe are in your best interests.
Maryland law provides that a trustee has no liability in that capacity if he or she satisfies his or her duties to us and our shareholders. Under current Maryland law, our trustees and officers will not have any liability to us or our shareholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:
•actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or
•a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the trustee or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated.
In addition, our charterdeclaration of trust authorizes and our bylaws require us to indemnify our trustees for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws also authorizerequire us to indemnify our officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our trustees and officers than might otherwise exist. Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any of our trustees or officers impede the performance of Washington REIT,Elme Communities, your ability to recover damages from such trustees or officers will be limited with respect to trustees and may be limited with respect to officers. In addition, we will be obligatedhave agreed to obligations to advance the defense costs incurred by our trustees and our executive officers, and may, in the discretion of our board of trustees,Board, advance the defense costs incurred by our officers, our employees and other agents, in connection with legal proceedings.
Risks Related to Our Common Shares
We cannot assure you we will continue to pay dividends at current rates.rates and the failure to do so could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly, we may have to borrow on our lines of credit to sustain the dividend rate or reduce our dividend. Our ability to continue to pay dividends on our common shares at their current rate or to increase our common share dividend rate will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, the following:
our future financial condition and results of operations;
real estate market conditions in the Washington metro region;
the performance of lease terms by tenants;
operations and the terms of our loan covenants; anddebt covenants.
our ability to acquire, finance, develop or redevelop and lease additional properties at attractive rates.
Our board of trusteesBoard considers, among other factors, trends in our levels of funds from operations, together with associated recurring capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and incentives, and adjustments to straight-line rents to reflect cash rents received.received to achieve a targeted payout ratio. If some or all of these factors were to trend downward for a sustained period of time, our board of trusteesBoard could determine to reduce our dividend rate. If we do not maintain or increase the dividend rate on our common shares in the future, it could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.
Further issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to current shareholders.
The interestsAdditionally, the market value of our existing shareholders couldsecurities can be diluted if additional equity securities are issued,adversely affected by many factors, including certain factors related to finance future developments and acquisitions, instead of incurring additional debt. Our ability to execute our business strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt and equity financing.REIT status.
The market value of our securities can be adversely affected by many factors.
As with any public company, a number of factors may adversely influence the public market price of our common shares. These factors include:
•level of institutional interest in us;
•perceived attractiveness of investment in us, in comparison to other REITs;
•perceived attractiveness of the Washington, DC metro region, particularly if investors have a negative sentiment about the impact of election results on the region's economy;and Sunbelt regions;
•attractiveness of securities of REITs in comparison to other asset classes taking into account, among other things, that a substantial portion of REITs’ dividends may be taxed as ordinary income;
•our financial condition and performance;
•the market’s perception of our growth potential and potential future cash dividends;
•investor confidence in the stock and bond markets generally;
•national economic conditions and general stock and bond market conditions;
•government uncertainty, action or regulation, including changes in tax law;regulation;
•increases in market interest rates, which may lead investors to expect a higher annual yield from our distributions in relation to the price of our shares;
•uncertainty around and changes in U.S. federal tax laws;
•changes in our credit ratings; and
•any negative change in the level of our dividend or the partial payment thereof in common shares.
Additionally, any future offerings of our shares may dilute the holdings of our existing shareholders, reduce the market price of our shares, or both. Holders of our shares are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution.
Risks Related to Taxes and our Status as a REIT
LossThe loss of our tax status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our common shares.
We believe that we qualify as a REIT, and we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, our declaration of trust provides that our Board may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we are qualified as such,a REIT, or that we will remain qualified as sucha REIT in the future. This is because qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code which include:
include maintaining ownership of specified minimum levels of real estate related assets;
estate-related assets, generating specified minimum levels of real estate related income;
estate-related income, maintaining certain diversity of ownership requirements with respect to our shares;shares and
distributing at least 90% of our "REIT“REIT taxable income"income” (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) on an annual basis. Moreover, the complexity of these provisions and of applicable treasury regulations is greater in the case of a REIT that, like us, holds some of its assets through entities treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The distribution requirement noted above could adversely affect our ability to use earnings for improvements or acquisitions because funds distributed to shareholders will not be available for capital improvements to existing properties or for acquiring additional properties.
Only limited judicial and administrative interpretations of the REIT rules exist. In addition, qualification as a REIT involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly change the tax laws or the application of the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of such qualification. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and which generally takes effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, makes fundamental changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to businesses and their owners, including REITs and their shareholders.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we could face serious tax consequences that could substantially reduce our funds available for payment of dividends for each of the years involved because:
(i)we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates,rate, without any deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income;
we could be subject to the federal alternative minimum taxincome, and possibly increased state and local taxes (for our tax years that began prior to December 31, 2017);taxes; and
(ii)unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect towould be subject to taxdisqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we are disqualified.qualification was lost.
This treatment would reduce net earnings available for investment or distribution to shareholders because of the additional tax liability for the year (or years) involved. To the extent that distributions to shareholders had been made based on the assumption of our qualification as a REIT, we might be required to borrow funds or to liquidate certain of our investments to pay the applicable tax. As a result of these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. If we fail to qualify as a REIT but are eligible for certain relief provisions, then we may retain our status as a REIT but may be required to pay a penalty tax, which could be substantial.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually. In addition, we must ensure that, at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our total assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualifying real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans (the "75% asset test"). The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, securities treated as real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, securities treated as real estate assets and securities issued by a TRS) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% (25% for our tax years that began prior to December 31, 2017) of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. Effective for our taxable years that began after December 31, 2015, we can treat debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs, to the extent not secured by real property or interests in real property, as "real estate assets" for purposes of the 75% test (and, thus, not subject to the 10% and 5% asset tests), but the total value of such debt instruments cannot exceed 25% of the value of our total assets. If we fail to comply with these asset requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences.
To meet these tests, we may be required to take or forgo taking actions that we would otherwise consider advantageous. For instance, in order to satisfy the gross income or asset tests applicable to REITs under the Code, we may be required to forego investments that we otherwise would make. Furthermore, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio (or to contribute to a TRS) otherwise attractive investments. In addition, we may be required to make distributions to shareholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our shareholders. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, or, in certain cases, maintain ownership of, certain attractive investments.
The requirements necessary to maintain our REIT status limit our ability to earn fee income at the REIT level, which causes us to conduct certain fee-generating activities through a TRS.
The REIT provisions of the Code limit our ability to earn fee income from joint ventures and third parties. Our aggregate gross income from fees and certain other non-qualifying sources cannot exceed 5% of our annual gross income. As a result, our ability to increase the amount of fee income we earn at the REIT level is limited and, therefore, we conduct certain fee-generating activities through a TRS. Any fee income we earn through a TRS is subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax at regular corporate rates, which reduces our cash available for distribution to shareholders.
Our ability to own stock and securities of TRSs is limited and our transactions with our TRS will cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on arm's-length terms.
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% (25% for tax years that began prior to December 31, 2017) of the value of a REIT's assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the rules applicable to TRSs limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on the parent REIT with respect to certain transactions involving a TRS that are not conducted on an arm's-length basis.
Our TRSs will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income. The after-tax net income of our TRSs will be available for distribution to us but generally is not required to be distributed. We believe that the aggregate value of the stock and securities of our TRSs is less than 20% (25% for tax years that began prior to December 31, 2017) of the value of our total assets (including the stock and securities of our TRS). Furthermore, we monitor the value of our respective investments in our TRSs for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the ownership limitations applicable to TRSs. We scrutinize all of our transactions involving our TRSs to ensure that they are entered into on arm's-length terms to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with the 20% (25% for tax years that began prior to December 31, 2017) limitation discussed above or avoid application of the 100% excise tax discussed above.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge our assets and operations. Under these provisions, income that we generate from transactions we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets, or manage the risk of certain currency fluctuations, and such instrument is properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, does not constitute "gross income" for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit our use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous or implement those hedges through a TRS. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because our TRS would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in our TRS will generally not provide any current tax benefit, except to the extent that they may be carried back to prior years or forward to future years and offset against taxable income in the TRS, provided, however, losses in our TRS arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, may only be carried forward and may only be deducted against 80% of future taxable income in the TRS.
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
The maximum tax rate applicable to income from "qualified dividends"“qualified dividends” payable by non-REIT “C”C corporations to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts andor estates generally is 20% (excluding the 3.8% net investment income tax). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the maximum 20% reduced rate and are taxed at applicable ordinary income tax rates, except to the extent that certain holding requirements have been met and a REIT'sREIT’s dividends are attributable to dividends received by a REIT from taxable corporations (such as a TRS)taxable REIT subsidiary), to income that was subject to tax at the REIT/corporate level, or to dividends properly designated by the REIT as “capital gain dividends.” Effective forFor taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, those U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of their dividends from REITs (excluding qualified dividend income and capital gains dividends). For those U.S. shareholders in the top marginal tax bracket of 37%, the deduction for REIT dividends yields an effective income tax rate of 29.6% (exclusive of(excluding the net investment income tax) on REIT dividends, which is higher than the 20% tax rate on qualified dividend income paid by non-REIT “C”C corporations (although the maximum effective rate applicable to such dividends, after taking into account the 21% U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to non-REIT “C”C corporations is 36.8% (exclusive of(excluding the 3.8% net investment income tax)). Although the reduced rates applicable to dividend income from non-REIT “C”C corporations doesdo not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, these reduced rates could cause investors who are non-corporate taxpayers to perceive
investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the shares of non-REIT "C"C corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common shares.
Gains from sales of properties are potentially subject to the "prohibited transactions tax" or a corporate level income tax and could require us to make additional distributions to our shareholders that would reduce our capital available for investment in other properties or require us to obtain additional funds to pay such taxes or make such distributions.
A REIT's net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will be able to make use of the otherwise available safe harbors. In addition, the sale of properties may generate gains for tax purposes which, if not adequately deferred through “like-kind exchanges” under Section 1031 of the Code ("Section 1031 Exchanges"), could require us to pay more taxes or make additional distributions to our shareholders, thus reducing our capital available for investment in other properties, or if the proceeds of such sales are already invested in other properties, require us to obtain additional funds to pay such taxes or make such distributions.From time to time, we dispose of properties in transactions intended to qualify as Section 1031 Exchanges. Intermediary agents of Section 1031 Exchanges typically handle large sums of money in trust. It is possible that the qualification of a transaction as a Section 1031 Exchange could be successfully challenged and determined to be currently taxable. In such case, our taxable income and earnings and profits would increase. This could increase the dividend income to our shareholders by reducing any return of capital they received. In some circumstances, we may be required to pay additional dividends or, in lieu of that, corporate income tax, possibly including interest and penalties. As a result, we may be required to borrow funds in order to pay additional dividends or taxes, and the payment of such taxes could cause us to have less cash available to distribute to our shareholders. In addition, if a Section 1031 Exchange were later to be determined to be taxable, we may be required to amend our tax returns for the applicable year in question, including any information reports we sent our shareholders. Moreover, it is possible that legislation could be enacted that could modify or repeal the laws with respect to Section 1031 Exchanges, which could make it more difficult or not possible for us to dispose of properties on a tax deferred basis.
The REIT distribution requirements could require us to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions or subject us to tax, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our shareholders, on an annual basis, at least 90% of our "REIT“REIT taxable income,"” determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains. In addition, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate ratesrate (currently 21%) to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income (including net capital gains) and will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount by which our distributions in any calendar year are less than a minimum amount specified under U.S. federal income tax laws. We intend to continue to distribute our net income to our shareholders in a manner intended to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.
In addition, from time to time our taxable income may exceed our net income as determined by GAAP. This may occur, for instance, because realized capital losses are deducted in determining our GAAP net income but may not be deductible in computing our taxable income. In addition, we may incur nondeductible capital expenditures or be required to make debt or amortization payments. As a result of the foregoing, we may generate less cash flow than taxable income in a particular year and we may incur U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax on that income if we do not distribute such income to shareholders in that year. In that event, we may be required to (i) use cash reserves, (ii) incur debt at rates or times that we regard as unfavorable, (iii) sell assets in adverse market conditions, (iv) distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, or (v) make a taxable distribution of our shares as part of a distribution in which shareholders may elect to receive our shares or (subject to a limit measured as a percentage of the total distribution) cash in order to satisfy the REIT 90% distribution requirement and to avoid U.S. federal income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax in that year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce or dilute our equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of the cash that we might receive from cash settlement of a forward sale agreement is unclear and could jeopardize our ability of our board of trustees to revoke ourmeet the REIT qualification without shareholder approvalrequirements.
We may cause adverse consequencesenter into forward sale agreements from time to time and, subject to certain conditions, we have the right to elect physical, cash or net share settlement under these agreements at any time and from time to time, in part or in full. In the event that we elect to settle a forward sale agreement for cash and the settlement price is below the forward sale price, we would be entitled to receive a cash payment from the applicable forward purchaser(s). Under Section 1032 of the Code, generally, no gains and losses are recognized by a corporation in dealing in its own shares, including pursuant to a “securities futures contract,” as defined in the Code by reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe that any amount received by us in exchange for our shareholders.
Our charter provides that our boardcommon shares would qualify for the exemption under Section 1032 of trustees may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if it determines thatCode, because it is no longer in our best interestnot entirely clear whether a forward sale agreement qualifies as a “securities futures contract,” the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any cash settlement payment we receive is uncertain. In the event that we recognize a significant gain from the cash settlement of a forward sale agreement, we might not be able to continuesatisfy the gross income requirements applicable to REITs under the Code. If we were to fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT.REIT for such year if we were entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code. If these relief provisions were inapplicable, we ceasewould not qualify to be taxed as a REIT, we will not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to shareholders in computing our taxable income, will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates, and generally would no longer be required to distribute any of our net taxable income to our shareholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our shareholders.REIT.
Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income, property or net worth, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. Moreover, if we have net income from "prohibited“prohibited transactions,"” that income will be subject to a 100% tax. The need to avoid prohibited transactions could cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that might otherwise be in our best interest to sell. In addition, we could, in certain circumstances, be required to pay an excise or penalty tax (which could be significant in amount) in order to utilize one or more relief provisions under the Code to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for the payment of our debt obligations and distributions to shareholders. Our TRSstaxable REIT subsidiary (and any taxable REIT subsidiary formed in the future) generally will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income tax on their net taxable income. Moreover, while we will attempt to ensure that our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiary (and any taxable REIT subsidiary formed in the future) do not adversely affect our REIT qualification, we cannot provide assurances that we will successfully achieve that result.
Recent legislative changes to our ability to deduct for
Partnership tax purposes compensation paid to our executivesaudit rules could require us to increase our distributions to stockholders in order to maintain REIT status or to avoid entity-level taxes.
Section 162(m) of the Code prohibits publicly held corporations from taking a tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any of the corporation’s “covered employees.” Prior to the enactment of the TCJA, a publicly held corporation’s covered employees included its chief executive officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer), and certain “performance-based compensation” was excluded from the $1 million cap. The TCJA made certain changes to Section 162(m), effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. These changes include, among others, expanding the definition of “covered employee” to include the chief financial officer and repealing the performance-based compensation exception to the $1 million cap, subject to a transition rule for remuneration provided pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017, and which was not modified in any material respect on or after that date.
Since we qualify as a REIT under the Code and we are generally not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, if compensation did not qualify for deduction under Section 162(m), the payment of compensation that fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) would not have a material adverse consequenceeffect on us.
Under current federal partnership tax audit rules, subject to us, providedcertain exceptions, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and a partner’s allocable share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, and penalties attributable thereto are assessed and collected, at the partnership level. With respect to any partnership in which we continueinvest, unless such partnership makes an election or takes certain steps to distribute 100%require the partners to pay their tax on their allocable shares of our taxable income. Based on our current taxable income and distributions, we do not believethe adjustment, it is possible that we willsuch partnership would be required to increase our ratepay additional taxes, interest, and penalties as a result of distributions in orderan audit adjustment. We could be required to maintain our statusbear the economic burden of those taxes, interest, and penalties even though we, as a REIT, (or to avoid paying corporate or excise taxes at the entity level) if a portion of our payment of compensation fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m). However, in that case, a larger portion of shareholder distributions that wouldmay not otherwise have been treated as a return of capital will be subject to federal income tax as dividend income. In the future, if we make compensation payments subject to Section 162(m) limitations on deductibility, we may be required to makepay additional distributions to shareholders to comply with REIT distribution requirements and eliminate U.S. federal income tax liability atcorporate‑level taxes had we owned the entity level. Any such compensation allocated to our TRSs whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax would result in an increase in income taxes due toassets of the inability to deduct such compensation.partnership directly.
There is a risk of changes in the tax law applicable to REITslaws which may adversely affect our taxation as a REIT and taxation of our shareholders.
The IRS, the United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review U.S. federal income tax legislation, regulations and other guidance. Most recently, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the U.S. federal income tax laws in connection with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations or rulings will be adopted. Further, from time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result in an increase in our tax liability.Any legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect our taxation or taxation of our shareholders. In particular, the TCJA makes many significant changesWe urge you to the U.S. federal incomeconsult with your tax laws that will profoundly impact the taxation of individuals and corporations (both regular non-REIT C corporations as well as corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs). A number of changes that affect noncorporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. These changes will impact us and our shareholders in various ways, some of which are adverse or potentially adverse compared to prior law. To date, the IRS has issued only limited guidanceadvisor with respect to certainthe status of the new provisions,legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require guidance. It is highly likely that technical corrections legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new lawproposals and give propertheir potential effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical clarifications or changes needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congresson an investment in the near future.our common shares.
ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 1C: CYBERSECURITY
We are committed and focused on cybersecurity and seek to ensure the safeguarding of data entrusted to us. Our cybersecurity strategy combines prevention with resiliency and continuous improvement to help enhance our organization’s cyber posture. We regularly reevaluate the threat landscape and evolve our strategies to address new threats. In addition to regularly refining our protection methodology, we focus on identification of, response to, and recovery from a cyber-attack. Our program employs the strengths of people, processes, and technology to protect resident, employee, and organization data.
Cybersecurity Risk Management Processes
In managing cybersecurity risks, we follow a structured framework informed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework. This framework provides a comprehensive set of guidelines and leading practices, enabling us to identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover from cyber threats and potential cybersecurity incidents. Regularly benchmarking our cybersecurity measures against the NIST framework helps ensure that our protocols remain robust and current in the face of evolving cyber threats.
Our Cybersecurity Risk Management (“CRM”) processes are ingrained in our overall Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) process. As part of our ERM process, department leaders identify, assess and evaluate risks impacting Elme and its operations across several pillars corresponding to significant business processes, including those risks related to cybersecurity. The IT department reviews risks, threats, and trends related to cybersecurity on a daily basis and formally discusses the Company's cybersecurity strategy on a weekly basis. We evaluate the methods, procedures and initiatives that reduce identified inherent risks and the residual risk to the Company. The identified risks and the processes we use to manage these risks are presented to the executive team and the Board on at least an annual basis. We report results of our ERM process, along with an assessment of top risks and corresponding risk management strategy, to the Board. Cybersecurity is a distinct pillar of our ERM process. Some of our key risks concerning cybersecurity that are included in our CRM processes include the following:
•Data loss and/or damages to systems resulting from malicious or accidental actions of an internal employee,
•external parties committing social engineering (e.g., phishing) or business email compromise attacks,
•third-party software service providers suffering a cybersecurity incident that has a significant impact on our business, data or ability to operate, and
•a ransomware attack resulting in encrypted data and release of confidential company and/or resident information.
The Company’s Board of Trustees does not believe that there are currently any risks from cybersecurity threats that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company or its business strategy, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
To manage these risks, we take various actions, including the following:
•Require an annual user awareness and education program in which new and existing employees complete assessments to benchmark their awareness of cybersecurity threats and leading practices,
•conduct regular email phishing tests with additional training provided to employees who fail the tests,
•perform in-house vulnerability management and third-party network penetration testing,
•secure insurance coverage for cybersecurity incidents,
•routinely benchmark our cybersecurity practices against industry leading frameworks,
•conduct incident response tabletop exercises to test our security countermeasures and incident response program,
•engage a third-party firm to audit our cybersecurity procedures,
•engage a third-party Managed Security Service Provider to perform network and endpoints monitoring,
These actions help us identify opportunities for improvement in our incident preparedness and response processes.
In the event of a cybersecurity incident, we maintain a regularly tested incident response program. Pursuant to the program and its escalation protocols, designated personnel are responsible for assessing the severity of the incident and associated threat, containing the threat, remediating the threat, including recovery of data and access to systems, analyzing any reporting and disclosure obligations associated with the incident, and performing post-incident analysis and program enhancements. While the personnel assigned to an incident response team may depend on the particular facts and circumstances, the team is generally led by the Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) or another member of the IT team and will include other information technology and legal personnel. The incident response team regularly reports to senior management, in the event of a potentially notable incident. The CIO or another member of the incident response team also reports periodically to the Company’s Board regarding cybersecurity incidents impacting us.
We use third parties for various services such as property management, enterprise resource planning software and cloud computing. The use of third parties exposes us to risks that cybersecurity incidents at a third-party provider would impact Elme’s operations and data security. We identify these risks with our robust evaluation program for our third-party partners, in which we assess third-party cybersecurity controls through a questionnaire and include security terms in our contracts where applicable. We mitigate these risks by assessing cybersecurity practices of new providers, continually reviewing and monitoring the cybersecurity practices of our major service providers and conducting periodic reviews of the cybersecurity strategy and posture of our other significant providers. We also consider cybersecurity incidents at our third-party providers in our business continuity and disaster recovery planning.
We have not experienced any material cybersecurity incidents to date. Notwithstanding the extensive approach we take to address cybersecurity, we may not be successful in preventing or mitigating all cybersecurity incidents or threats. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for a discussion of cybersecurity risks.
Governance
Elme’s leadership is committed to maintaining a secure environment that upholds high standards of privacy and data protection. The executive team reviews industry specific cybersecurity statistics and updates monthly from the IT team. We have documented control procedures that govern access to sensitive data and changes made to critical business systems. Our Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan (“CIRP”) helps ensure timely notification of cybersecurity incidents to management and the Board.
Our CIO, has been responsible for the development, enhancement, and oversight of cybersecurity programs in her role as CIO for over a decade at two publicly traded real estate companies. She is a member of the Real Estate Cyber Consortium, the National Multi Housing Council Data Privacy, Security, and Information Management Committee, and the RE-ISAC Cybersecurity Working Group.
The Board is responsible for review and oversight of Elme’s cybersecurity risks and the programs and steps implemented by management to assess, manage and mitigate such risks. In the event of a cybersecurity incident, the Board is informed and updated by the incident response team as appropriate. Executive management provides regular updates during board meetings to help ensure that our trustees are informed about the evolving threat landscape and our risk management strategies. The Board
receives a cyber update from the CIO on an annual basis. The Board receives communications via email from the CIO on topics of interest throughout the year.
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
The schedule on the following pages lists our real estate investment portfolio as of December 31, 2017,2023, which consisted of 49 properties28 residential communities, one office building and land held for development. Cost information is included in Schedule III to our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
AsSchedule of December 31, 2017, the percentProperties
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Year Acquired | | Year Constructed/Renovated | | # of Homes | | Average Occupancy, year ended December 31, 2023 | | Ending Occupancy, as of December 31, 2023 |
| Residential Communities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Elme Alexandria | | Alexandria, VA | | 2019 | | 1990 | | 532 | | | 94.6 | % | | 95.7 | % |
| Cascade at Landmark | | Alexandria, VA | | 2019 | | 1988 | | 277 | | | 96.2 | % | | 97.5 | % |
| Clayborne | | Alexandria, VA | | N/A | | 2008 | | 74 | | | 96.3 | % | | 95.9 | % |
| Riverside Apartments | | Alexandria, VA | | 2016 | | 1971 | | 1,222 | | | 96.1 | % | | 97.1 | % |
| Bennett Park | | Arlington, VA | | N/A | | 2007 | | 224 | | | 95.7 | % | | 96.4 | % |
| Park Adams | | Arlington, VA | | 1969 | | 1959 | | 200 | | | 96.4 | % | | 96.0 | % |
| The Maxwell | | Arlington, VA | | N/A | | 2014 | | 163 | | | 97.0 | % | | 96.9 | % |
| The Paramount | | Arlington, VA | | 2013 | | 1984 | | 135 | | | 96.8 | % | | 97.8 | % |
| The Wellington | | Arlington, VA | | 2015 | | 1960 | | 710 | | | 95.9 | % | | 96.9 | % |
| Trove | | Arlington, VA | | N/A | | 2020 | | 401 | | | 95.9 | % | | 95.5 | % |
| Roosevelt Towers | | Falls Church, VA | | 1965 | | 1964 | | 191 | | | 96.0 | % | | 97.9 | % |
| Elme Dulles | | Herndon, VA | | 2019 | | 2000 | | 328 | | | 96.0 | % | | 97.3 | % |
| Elme Herndon | | Herndon, VA | | 2019 | | 1991 | | 283 | | | 96.0 | % | | 96.5 | % |
| Elme Leesburg | | Leesburg, VA | | 2019 | | 1986 | | 134 | | | 95.7 | % | | 97.0 | % |
| Elme Manassas | | Manassas, VA | | 2019 | | 1986 | | 408 | | | 94.2 | % | | 93.1 | % |
| The Ashby at McLean | | McLean, VA | | 1996 | | 1982 | | 268 | | | 95.9 | % | | 95.5 | % |
| 3801 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | 1963 | | 1951 | | 307 | | | 96.5 | % | | 96.4 | % |
| Kenmore Apartments | | Washington, DC | | 2008 | | 1948 | | 371 | | | 95.8 | % | | 95.7 | % |
| Yale West | | Washington, DC | | 2014 | | 2011 | | 216 | | | 95.6 | % | | 97.2 | % |
| Elme Bethesda | | Bethesda, MD | | 1997 | | 1986 | | 193 | | | 96.8 | % | | 98.4 | % |
| Elme Watkins Mill | | Gaithersburg, MD | | 2019 | | 1975 | | 210 | | | 95.6 | % | | 96.2 | % |
| Elme Germantown | | Germantown, MD | | 2019 | | 1990 | | 218 | | | 96.0 | % | | 95.9 | % |
| Elme Conyers | | Conyers, GA | | 2021 | | 1999 | | 240 | | | 93.8 | % | | 93.3 | % |
| Elme Eagles Landing | | Stockbridge, GA | | 2021 | | 2000 | | 490 | | | 92.4 | % | | 89.0 | % |
| Elme Marietta | | Marietta, GA | | 2022 | | 1975 | | 420 | | | 92.4 | % | | 90.7 | % |
| Elme Sandy Springs | | Sandy Springs, GA | | 2022 | | 1972 | | 389 | | | 93.4 | % | | 91.3 | % |
| Elme Cumberland | | Smyrna, GA | | 2022 | | 1982 | | 270 | | | 93.3 | % | | 91.1 | % |
| Elme Druid Hills | | Atlanta, GA | | 2023 | | 1987 | | 500 | | | 93.4 | % | | 93.8 | % |
| Subtotal Residential Communities | | | | | | | | 9,374 | | | 95.2 | % | | 95.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property | | Location | | Year Acquired | | Year Constructed/Renovated | | Net Rentable Square Feet | | Percent Leased, as of December 31, 2023 (1) | | Ending Occupancy, as of December 31, 2023 (1) |
| Office Building | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Watergate 600 | | Washington, DC | | 2017 | | 1972/1997 | | 300,000 | | | 87.8 | % | | 87.8 | % |
(1) Percent leased and ending occupancy calculations are based on square feet and includes temporary lease agreements for Watergate 600. Percent leased is (i) for commercial properties, the percentage of net rentable area for which fully executed leases exist and may include signed leases for space not yet occupied by the tenant, and (ii) for multifamily properties, the percentage of units leased. Cost information is included in Schedule III to our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.tenant.
Schedule of Properties
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Year Acquired | | Year Constructed/Renovated | | Net Rentable Square Feet | | Percent Leased, as of December 31, 2017 (1) | | Ending Occupancy, as of December 31, 2017 (1) |
| Office Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1901 Pennsylvania Avenue | | Washington, DC | | 1977 | | 1960 | | 100,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 87 | % |
| 515 King Street | | Alexandria, VA | | 1992 | | 1966 | | 75,000 |
| | 94 | % | | 94 | % |
1220 19thStreet | | Washington, DC | | 1995 | | 1976 | | 105,000 |
| | 99 | % | | 97 | % |
| 1600 Wilson Boulevard | | Arlington, VA | | 1997 | | 1973 | | 170,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 98 | % |
| Silverline Center | | Tysons, VA | | 1997 | | 1972/2015 | | 549,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 96 | % |
| Courthouse Square | | Alexandria, VA | | 2000 | | 1979 | | 118,000 |
| | 93 | % | | 91 | % |
| 1776 G Street | | Washington, DC | | 2003 | | 1979 | | 264,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Monument II | | Herndon, VA | | 2007 | | 2000 | | 208,000 |
| | 88 | % | | 84 | % |
| 2000 M Street | | Washington, DC | | 2007 | | 1971 | | 233,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 99 | % |
| 2445 M Street | | Washington, DC | | 2008 | | 1986 | | 292,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 99 | % |
| 925 Corporate Drive | | Stafford, VA | | 2010 | | 2007 | | 135,000 |
| | 69 | % | | 69 | % |
| 1000 Corporate Drive | | Stafford, VA | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 136,000 |
| | 63 | % | | 63 | % |
| 1140 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | 2011 | | 1966 | | 184,000 |
| | 92 | % | | 91 | % |
| 1227 25th Street | | Washington, DC | | 2011 | | 1988 | | 137,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 94 | % |
| Braddock Metro Center | | Alexandria, VA | | 2011 | | 1985 | | 356,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 60 | % |
| John Marshall II | | Tysons, VA | | 2011 | | 1996/2010 | | 223,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Fairgate at Ballston | | Arlington, VA | | 2012 | | 1988 | | 146,000 |
| | 94 | % | | 92 | % |
| Army Navy Building | | Washington, DC | | 2014 | | 1912/1987 | | 109,000 |
| | 91 | % | | 79 | % |
| 1775 Eye Street, NW | | Washington, DC | | 2014 | | 1964 | | 188,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 99 | % |
| Watergate 600 | | Washington, DC | | 2017 | | 1972/1997 | | 293,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 98 | % |
| Subtotal | | | | | | | | 4,021,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 90 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Leased percentage and ending occupancy calculations are based on square feet for office buildings and retail centers and on units for multifamily buildings.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Year Acquired | | Year Constructed/Renovated | | # of Units | | Net Rentable Square Feet | | Percent Leased, as of December 31, 2017 (1) | | Ending Occupancy, as of December 31, 2017 (1) |
| Retail Centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Takoma Park | | Takoma Park, MD | | 1963 | | 1962 | | | | 51,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
| Westminster | | Westminster, MD | | 1972 | | 1969 | | | | 150,000 |
| | 98 | % | | 95 | % |
| Concord Centre | | Springfield, VA | | 1973 | | 1960 | | | | 75,000 |
| | 77 | % | | 77 | % |
| Wheaton Park | | Wheaton, MD | | 1977 | | 1967 | | | | 74,000 |
| | 92 | % | | 92 | % |
| Bradlee Shopping Center | | Alexandria, VA | | 1984 | | 1955 | | | | 172,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 97 | % |
| Chevy Chase Metro Plaza | | Washington, DC | | 1985 | | 1975 | | | | 49,000 |
| | 89 | % | | 89 | % |
| Shoppes of Foxchase | | Alexandria, VA | | 1994 | | 1960/2006 | | | | 134,000 |
| | 98 | % | | 97 | % |
| Frederick County Square | | Frederick, MD | | 1995 | | 1973 | | | | 228,000 |
| | 93 | % | | 93 | % |
| 800 S. Washington Street | | Alexandria, VA | | 1998 | | 1951/1959 | | | | 46,000 |
| | 93 | % | | 93 | % |
| Centre at Hagerstown | | Hagerstown, MD | | 2002 | | 2000 | | | | 333,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 86 | % |
| Frederick Crossing | | Frederick, MD | | 2005 | | 1999/2003 | | | | 295,000 |
| | 89 | % | | 89 | % |
| Randolph Shopping Center | | Rockville, MD | | 2006 | | 1972 | | | | 83,000 |
| | 88 | % | | 67 | % |
| Montrose Shopping Center | | Rockville, MD | | 2006 | | 1970 | | | | 147,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 97 | % |
| Gateway Overlook | | Columbia, MD | | 2010 | | 2007 | | | | 220,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 98 | % |
| Olney Village Center | | Olney, MD | | 2011 | | 1979/2003 | | | | 198,000 |
| | 99 | % | | 95 | % |
| Spring Valley Village | | Washington, DC | | 2014 | | 1941/1950 | | | | 78,000 |
| | 86 | % | | 82 | % |
| Subtotal | | | | | | | | | | 2,333,000 |
| | 94 | % | | 91 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Multifamily Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3801 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | 1963 | | 1951 | | 307 |
| | 178,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 94 | % |
| Roosevelt Towers | | Falls Church, VA | | 1965 | | 1964 | | 191 |
| | 170,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 94 | % |
| Park Adams | | Arlington, VA | | 1969 | | 1959 | | 200 |
| | 173,000 |
| | 96 | % | | 94 | % |
| The Ashby at McLean | | McLean, VA | | 1996 | | 1982 | | 256 |
| | 274,000 |
| | 96 | % | | 96 | % |
| Bethesda Hill Apartments | | Bethesda, MD | | 1997 | | 1986 | | 195 |
| | 225,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 95 | % |
| Bennett Park | | Arlington, VA | | 2001 | | 2007 | | 224 |
| | 215,000 |
| | 96 | % | | 96 | % |
| Clayborne | | Alexandria, VA | | 2003 | | 2008 | | 74 |
| | 60,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 95 | % |
| Kenmore Apartments | | Washington, DC | | 2008 | | 1948 | | 374 |
| | 268,000 |
| | 95 | % | | 92 | % |
| The Paramount | | Arlington, VA | | 2013 | | 1984 | | 135 |
| | 141,000 |
| | 96 | % | | 96 | % |
| Yale West | | Washington, DC | | 2014 | | 2011 | | 216 |
| | 173,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 96 | % |
| The Maxwell | | Arlington, VA | | 2011 | | 2014 | | 163 |
| | 116,000 |
| | 98 | % | | 98 | % |
| The Wellington | | Arlington, VA | | 2015 | | 1960 | | 711 |
| | 600,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 95 | % |
| Riverside Apartments | | Alexandria, VA | | 2016 | | 1971 | | 1,222 |
| | 1,001,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 96 | % |
| Subtotal | | | | | | | | 4,268 |
| | 3,594,000 |
| | 97 | % | | 95 | % |
| TOTAL | | | | | | | | | | 9,948,000 |
| | | | |
(1) Leased percentage and ending occupancy calculations are based on square feet for office buildings and retail centers and on units for multifamily buildings.
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
N/A.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market and Shareholder Information:Our shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange under the symbol ELME. As of February 15, 2018,13, 2024, there are 3,775were 2,651 shareholders of record.
The high and low intraday price for our shares for 2017 and 2016, by quarter, and the amountIssuer Repurchases; Unregistered Sales of dividends we declared per share are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Quarterly Share Price Range |
| Quarter | | | | Dividends Per Share | | High | | Low |
| 2017 | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fourth | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 33.75 |
| | $ | 30.84 |
|
| | | Third | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 33.96 |
| | $ | 30.90 |
|
| | | Second | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 33.30 |
| | $ | 30.59 |
|
| | | First | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 33.63 |
| | $ | 29.90 |
|
| 2016 | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fourth | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 32.98 |
| | $ | 27.65 |
|
| | | Third | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 34.61 |
| | $ | 29.84 |
|
| | | Second | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 31.47 |
| | $ | 27.88 |
|
| | | First | | 0.30000 |
| | $ | 29.52 |
| | $ | 23.89 |
|
We have historically declared dividends on a quarterly basis. The maintenance of our dividend level is subject to various factors reviewed by the board of trustees in its discretion. These factors include our results of operations, the availability of cash and the REIT distribution requirements, which require at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to be distributed to shareholders on an annual basis. For further discussion, please refer to:
"Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Dividends"; and
"Item 1A - Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Common Shares - We cannot assure you we will continue to pay dividends at current rates."
On April 4, 2017, our consolidated subsidiary, WashREIT Watergate 600 OP LP (“Watergate 600 OP”) issued a total of 12,124 operating partnership units (“Operating Partnership Units”) to the two contributors of the Watergate 600 property as part of the 2017 acquisition of that property. Under the Watergate 600 OP partnership agreement, each partnership unit held by the limited partners of Watergate 600 OP may be redeemed for either cash equal to the fair market value of a share of Washington REIT common stock at the time of redemption (based on a 20-day average price) or, at the option of Washington REIT, one share of Washington REIT common stock. The Operating Partnership Units were issued to the contributors of the Watergate 600 property and were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. This issuance was not a “public offering” because only two contributors were involved in the transaction, we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising in connection with such issuance or transaction and we have not offered securities to the public in connection with such issuance and transaction.
Securities:A summary of our repurchases of our common shares of our common stockbeneficial interest for the three months ended December 31, 20172023 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased |
| October 1 - October 31, 2023 | — | | $ | — | | 0 | $50,000,000 |
| November 1 - November 30, 2023 | — | | — | | 0 | 50,000,000 |
| December 1 - December 31, 2023 | 24,049 | | 14.49 | | 0 | 50,000,000 |
| Total | 24,049 | | $ | 14.49 | | 0 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
| Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased |
| October 1 - October 31, 2017 | — |
| $ | — |
| N/A | N/A |
| November 1 - November 30, 2017 | 63 |
| 32.77 |
| N/A | N/A |
| December 1 - December 31, 2017 | 31,277 |
| 31.12 |
| N/A | N/A |
| Total | 31,340 |
| 31.12 |
| N/A | N/A |
(1)Represents restricted shares surrendered by employees to Washington REITElme Communities to satisfy such employees' applicable statutory minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares.
(2) On October 26, 2023, the Board authorized and approved a share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest over a period of two years, subject to any applicable limitations or restrictions set forth in our existing credit facility and other debt agreements. The share repurchase program is scheduled to expire on October 25, 2025, unless extended by the Board.
Performance Graph:
The following line graph sets forth, for the period from December 31, 2018, through December 31, 2023, a comparison of the percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares compared to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the MSCI US REIT Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2018, in shares of our common shares and each of the aforementioned indices and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions. There can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below.
This performance graph shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference into any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATARESERVED
The following table sets forth our selected financial data on a historical basis. The following data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in thousands, except per share data) |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 325,078 |
| | $ | 313,264 |
| | $ | 306,427 |
| | $ | 288,637 |
| | $ | 263,024 |
|
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
| | $ | 5,070 |
| | $ | (193 | ) |
| Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | |
| Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 546 |
| | $ | 15,395 |
|
| Gain on sale of real estate | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 105,985 |
| | $ | 22,144 |
|
| Net income | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
| | $ | 111,601 |
| | $ | 37,346 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 19,668 |
| | $ | 119,339 |
| | $ | 89,740 |
| | $ | 111,639 |
| | $ | 37,346 |
|
| Income from continuing operations attributable to the controlling interests per share – diluted | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests per share – diluted | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 1.67 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 2,359,426 |
| | $ | 2,253,619 |
| | $ | 2,191,168 |
| | $ | 2,108,317 |
| | $ | 1,969,343 |
|
| Lines of credit payable | $ | 166,000 |
| | $ | 120,000 |
| | $ | 105,000 |
| | $ | 50,000 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Mortgage notes payable, net | $ | 95,141 |
| | $ | 148,540 |
| | $ | 418,052 |
| | $ | 417,194 |
| | $ | 293,307 |
|
| Notes payable, net | $ | 894,358 |
| | $ | 843,084 |
| | $ | 743,181 |
| | $ | 743,149 |
| | $ | 841,917 |
|
| Shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,094,971 |
| | $ | 1,050,946 |
| | $ | 835,649 |
| | $ | 819,555 |
| | $ | 754,959 |
|
| Cash dividends declared | $ | 92,834 |
| | $ | 87,570 |
| | $ | 82,003 |
| | $ | 80,277 |
| | $ | 80,104 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
|
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We provide Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations and financial condition. We organize the MD&A as follows:
•Overview. Discussion of our business outlook, operating results, investment activity, financing activity and capital requirements to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.
•Results of Operations. Discussion of our financial results comparing 20172023 to 2016 and comparing 2016 to 2015.
2022.•Liquidity and Capital Resources. Discussion of our financial condition and analysis of changes in our capital structure and cash flows.
•Funds From Operations. Calculation of NAREIT Funds From Operations (“NAREIT FFO”), a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Descriptions of accounting policies that reflect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
When evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, we focus on the following financial and non-financial indicators:
•Net operating income (“NOI”), calculated as set forth below under the caption "Results of Operations - Net Operating Income." NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
•Funds From Operations (“NAREIT FFO”), calculated as set forth below under the caption “Funds from Operations.” NAREIT FFO is a non-GAAP supplemental measure to net income.
Occupancy•Average occupancy, calculated as average daily occupied square footageapartment homes as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period.
apartment homes.Leased percentage, calculated as the percentage of available physical net rentable area leased for our office and retail segments and percentage of apartments leased for our multifamily segment.
Leasing activity, including new leases, renewals and expirations.
For purposes of evaluating comparative operating performance, we categorize our properties as “same-store”, or “non-same-store” or discontinued operations.. Same-store portfolio properties include properties that were owned for the entirety of the years being compared and exclude properties under redevelopment or development and properties acquired, sold or classified as held for sale during the years being compared. We define development properties as those for which we have planned or ongoing major construction activities on existing or acquired land pursuant to an authorized development plan. We consider a property's development activities to be complete when the property is ready for its intended use. The property isDevelopment properties are categorized as same-store when it has been ready for its intended use forthey have reached stabilized occupancy (90%) before the entiretystart of the years being compared.prior year. We define redevelopment properties as those for which we have planned or ongoing significant development and construction activities on existing or acquired buildings pursuant to an authorized plan, which has an impact on current operating results, occupancy and the ability to lease space with the intended result of a higher economic return on the property. We categorize a redevelopment property as same-store when redevelopment activities have been complete for the majority of each year being compared.
Overview
Our revenues are derived primarily from the ownership and operation of income producing property. As of December 31, 2023, we owned approximately 9,400 residential apartment homes in the Washington, DC and Atlanta metro regions. We also own and operate approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial space in the Washington, DC metro region.
During 2022, we completed acquisitions of three apartment communities in Georgia with a combined total of 1,079 apartment homes for a total contract purchase price of $283.2 million. During 2023, we completed the acquisition of Elme Druid Hills, a 500-unit apartment community in Atlanta, Georgia for a contract purchase price of $108.0 million.
In connection with our strategic transformation, which shifted our business away from the commercial sector to the residential sector, we redesigned our operating model for purposes of more efficiently and effectively supporting residential operations. This operating model redesign included insourcing the property-level management activities at our multifamily properties previously performed by third-party management companies. Community onboarding began in October 2022, and we have transitioned all of our residential communities to Elme management as of July 2023. Costs related to the strategic transformation, including the allocation of internal costs, consulting, advisory and termination benefits, are included in transformation costs on our consolidated statements of operations. We recognized $6.3 million and $9.7 million of transformation costs, net of amounts capitalized, on the consolidated statements of operations during 2023 and 2022, respectively. We do not anticipate incurring any additional transformation costs in the future. We expect to realize significant operational benefits from this operating model redesign.
Operating Results
The discussion that follows is based on our Operating Results. The ability to compare one period to another is significantly affected
by the acquisitions completed 2023 and 2022 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Net income attributable to the controlling interests,loss, NOI and NAREIT FFO for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows (in thousands)thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | Change |
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 19,668 |
| | $ | 119,339 |
| | $ | (99,671 | ) |
NOI (1) | $ | 209,428 |
| | $ | 198,251 |
| | $ | 11,177 |
|
NAREIT FFO (2) | $ | 140,982 |
| | $ | 125,990 |
| | $ | 14,992 |
|
(1) See pages 32 and 36 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NOI to net income. |
(2) See page 48 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NAREIT FFO to net income. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | Change | | % Change |
| Net loss | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | (22,109) | | | 71.6 | % |
NOI (1) | $ | 148,081 | | | $ | 135,379 | | | $ | 12,702 | | | 9.4 | % |
NAREIT FFO (2) | $ | 77,833 | | | $ | 60,854 | | | $ | 16,979 | | | 27.9 | % |
| ______________________________ | | | | | | | |
(1) See page 33 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NOI to net (loss) income. | | |
(2) See page 43 of the MD&A for reconciliations of NAREIT FFO to net (loss) income. | | |
The decreaseincrease in net income attributable to the controlling interestsloss is primarily due to lower gains on sale of real estate ($76.8 million),a real estate impairment chargesin our office property ($33.241.9 million), higher general and administrative expensesinterest expense ($3.05.5 million) and higher depreciation and amortizationproperty management expenses ($3.70.7 million) in 2017,2023. These were partially offset by higher NOI ($11.212.7 million), lower loss on extinguishment of debt ($4.9 million), lower transformation costs ($3.3 million), lower depreciation and amortization expenses ($2.8 million), and lower interest expensegeneral and administrative expenses ($5.62.4 million).
The higher NOI is primarily due to income associated with acquisitionshigher NOI from same-store properties ($15.39.2 million) and higher same-store NOIthe acquisitions of Elme Marietta ($10.01.7 million), and Elme Cumberland ($1.0 million) in 2022 and Elme Druid Hills ($1.7 million) in 2023, partially offset by properties sold during 2016lower NOI at Watergate 600 ($0.3 million) and 2017Elme Sandy Springs ($13.20.4 million). The higher same-store NOI is explained in further detail beginning on page 32 (Resultswas primarily due to higher rental rates. Residential same-store average occupancy for our portfolio increased to 95.6% as of Operations - 2017 Compared to 2016).December 31, 2023 from 95.4% as of December 31, 2022.
The increase inhigher NAREIT FFO is primarily reflectsdue to higher NOI ($11.212.7 million), lower loss on extinguishment of debt ($4.9 million), lower transformation costs ($3.3 million) and lower interest expensegeneral and administrative expenses ($5.62.4 million),. These were partially offset by higher generalinterest expense ($5.5 million) and administrativehigher property management expenses ($3.00.7 million).
Investment Activity
Significant investment transactionsactivity during 20172023 included the following:
The acquisition of Watergate 600, which we refer to as the 2017 acquisition,Elme Druid Hills, a 293,000 net rentable square foot office building500-unit apartment community in Washington, DC,Atlanta, Georgia for a contract purchase price of $135.0 million. The purchase transaction was structured to include the issuance of 12,124 operating partnership units in WashREIT Watergate 600 OP LP, a consolidated subsidiary of Washington REIT, representing $0.4$108.0 million of the purchase price. We incurred $2.8 million of acquisition costs related to this transaction.
The sale of Walker House Apartments, a 212-unit multifamily property in Gaithersburg, Maryland, for a contract sale price of $32.2 million. We recognized a gain on sale of real estate of $23.8 million.
The execution of a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Braddock Metro Center, a 356,000 square foot office property in Alexandria, Virginia, for a contract sale price of $93.0 million.
Subsequent to the end of 2017, we acquired Arlington Tower, a 398,000 square foot office building in Rosslyn, Virginia for a contract purchase price of $250.0 million. We funded the acquisition with borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) and proceeds from the sale of Braddock Metro Center. We also executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of 2445 M Street, a 292,000 square foot office building in Washington, DC, for a contract sale price of $100.0 million. We currently expect to close on the sale during the third quarter of 2018. However, there can be no assurance that this proposed sale will be consummated. Additionally, we subsequently closed on2023. The acquisition was funded through cash and borrowings under the sale transaction of Braddock Metro Center, described above, in January 2018.Company's $700 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”).
Financing Activity
Significant financing transactionsactivity during 20172023 included the following:
The prepayment at par of the remaining $49.6 million of the mortgage note secured by the Army Navy Building in February 2017.
The draw of the remaining $50.0 million on the seven year, $150entering into a $125.0 million unsecured term loan agreement maturing(“2023 Term Loan”) with an interest rate of SOFR (subject to a credit spread adjustment of 10 basis points) plus a margin of 95 basis points (subject to adjustment depending on July 21, 2023.Elme Communities' credit rating). We used the borrowingproceeds from the 2023 Term Loan to refinance maturing secured debt.
The issuanceprepay the $100.0 million 2018 Term Loan in full and a portion of approximately 3.6 million common sharesour borrowings under our ATM program atRevolving Credit Facility. The 2023 Term Loan has a weighted average pricetwo-year term ending in January 2025, with two one-year extension options.
During 2023, we executed an amendment to the public of $32.06 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $113.2 million.
As of February 15, 2018, our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below)to convert the benchmark interest rate from LIBOR to an adjusted SOFR, with no change in the applicable interest rate margins. As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility is based on an adjusted daily SOFR (inclusive of the 0.10% credit spread adjustment) plus 0.85% applicable margin, the daily SOFR is 5.38% and the facility fee is 0.20%. As of February 13, 2024, our Revolving Credit Facility has a borrowing capacity of $257.0$535.0 million. As of December 31, 2017, the interest rate on the facility is LIBOR plus 1.0% and the LIBOR was 1.56% as of that date.
Capital Requirements
We do not currently have any debt maturities during 2018, but expect to prepay without penalty the $32.2 million mortgage note secured by Kenmore Apartments during the third quarter of 2018.scheduled for 2024. We expect to have the additional capital requirements as set forth on page 4037 (Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Structure)Requirements).
Results of Operations
The discussion that follows is based on our consolidated results of operations for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2017.2023. The ability to compare one period to another is significantly affected by the acquisitions completed and dispositions made during those years (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Net Operating Income
NOI, defined as real estate rental revenue less direct real estate operating expenses, is a non-GAAP measure. NOI is calculated as net income, less non-real estate revenue and the results of discontinued operations (including the gain or loss on sale, if any), plus interest expense, depreciation and amortization, lease origination expenses, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs, real estate impairment, casualty gain and losses and gain or loss on extinguishment of
debt. NOI does not include management expenses, which consist of corporate property management costs and property management fees paid to third parties. NOI is the primary performance measure we use to assess the results of our operations at the property level. We believe that NOI is a useful as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOIit reflects the impact on operations of trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs on an unleveraged basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. As a result of the foregoing, we provide NOI as a supplement to net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP. NOI does not represent net income or income from continuing operations in either case calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, itNOI should not be considered an alternative to these measures as an indication of our operating performance. A reconciliation of NOI to net income follows.
2017
2023 Compared to 20162022
The following tables reconcile NOI to net income attributable to the controlling interestsNOI and provide the basis for our discussion of our consolidated results of operations and NOI in 20172023 compared to 2016.2022. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non-Same-Store | | | | | | | | |
| | Same-Store | | | | | | Acquisitions (1) | | Development/Redevelopment (2) | | Held for Sale or Sold (3) | | All Properties | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $
Change | | %
Change |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 270,040 |
| | $ | 259,555 |
| | $ | 10,485 |
| | 4.0 | % | | $ | 36,800 |
| | $ | 13,113 |
| | $ | 4,559 |
| | $ | 4,926 |
| | $ | 13,679 |
| | $ | 35,670 |
| | $ | 325,078 |
| | $ | 313,264 |
| | $ | 11,814 |
| | 3.8 | % |
| Real estate expenses | 94,150 |
| | 93,674 |
| | 476 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 13,826 |
| | 5,475 |
| | 2,639 |
| | 2,787 |
| | 5,035 |
| | 13,077 |
| | 115,650 |
| | 115,013 |
| | 637 |
| | 0.6 | % |
| NOI | $ | 175,890 |
| | $ | 165,881 |
| | $ | 10,009 |
| | 6.0 | % | | $ | 22,974 |
| | $ | 7,638 |
| | $ | 1,920 |
| | $ | 2,139 |
| | $ | 8,644 |
| | $ | 22,593 |
| | $ | 209,428 |
| | $ | 198,251 |
| | $ | 11,177 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| Reconciliation to net income attributable to the controlling interests: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (112,056 | ) | | (108,406 | ) | | (3,650 | ) | | 3.4 | % |
| Acquisition costs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — |
| | (1,178 | ) | | 1,178 |
| | (100.0 | )% |
| General and administrative expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (22,580 | ) | | (19,545 | ) | | (3,035 | ) | | 15.5 | % |
| Real estate (impairment) and casualty gain, net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (33,152 | ) | | 676 |
| | (33,828 | ) | | (5,004.1 | )% |
| Gain on sale of real estate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,915 |
| | 101,704 |
| | (76,789 | ) | | (75.5 | )% |
| Interest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (47,534 | ) | | (53,126 | ) | | 5,592 |
| | (10.5 | )% |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 507 |
| | 297 |
| | 210 |
| | 70.7 | % |
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 84 |
| | 615 |
| | (531 | ) | | (86.3 | )% |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,612 |
| | 119,288 |
| | (99,676 | ) | | (83.6 | )% |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 56 |
| | 51 |
| | 5 |
| | 9.8 | % |
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 19,668 |
| | $ | 119,339 |
| | $ | (99,671 | ) | | (83.5 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net loss | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | (22,109) | | | 71.6 | % |
| Adjustments: | | | | | | | |
| Property management expense | 8,108 | | | 7,436 | | | 672 | | | 9.0 | % |
| General and administrative expense | 25,887 | | | 28,258 | | | (2,371) | | | (8.4) | % |
| Transformation costs | 6,339 | | | 9,686 | | | (3,347) | | | (34.6) | % |
| Real estate depreciation and amortization | 88,950 | | | 91,722 | | | (2,772) | | | (3.0) | % |
| Real estate impairment | 41,860 | | | — | | | 41,860 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 30,429 | | | 24,940 | | | 5,489 | | | 22.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 54 | | | 4,917 | | | (4,863) | | | (98.9) | % |
| Other income | (569) | | | (712) | | | 143 | | | (20.1) | % |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total net operating income (NOI) | $ | 148,081 | | | $ | 135,379 | | | $ | 12,702 | | | 9.4 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| Residential revenue: | | | | | | | |
| Same-store portfolio | $ | 185,958 | | | $ | 174,491 | | | $ | 11,467 | | | 6.6 | % |
Acquisitions (1) | 22,429 | | | 14,936 | | | 7,493 | | | 50.2 | % |
| Development | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | % |
Non-residential (2) | 924 | | | 1,073 | | | (149) | | | (13.9) | % |
| Total | 209,311 | | | 190,500 | | | 18,811 | | | 9.9 | % |
| Residential expenses: | | | | | | | |
| Same-store portfolio | 65,067 | | | 62,818 | | | 2,249 | | | 3.6 | % |
| Acquisitions | 8,996 | | | 5,508 | | | 3,488 | | | 63.3 | % |
| Development | 224 | | | 128 | | | 96 | | | 75.0 | % |
| Non-residential | 248 | | | 281 | | | (33) | | | (11.7) | % |
| Total | 74,535 | | | 68,735 | | | 5,800 | | | 8.4 | % |
| Residential NOI: | | | | | | | |
| Same-store portfolio | 120,891 | | | 111,673 | | | 9,218 | | | 8.3 | % |
| Acquisitions | 13,433 | | | 9,428 | | | 4,005 | | | 42.5 | % |
| Development | (224) | | | (128) | | | (96) | | | 75.0 | % |
| Non-residential | 676 | | | 792 | | | (116) | | | (14.6) | % |
| Total | 134,776 | | | 121,765 | | | 13,011 | | | 10.7 | % |
Other NOI (3) | 13,305 | | | 13,614 | | | (309) | | | (2.3) | % |
| Total NOI | $ | 148,081 | | | $ | 135,379 | | | $ | 12,702 | | | 9.4 | % |
______________________________
(1)Acquisitions:
2022: Elme Sandy Springs, Elme Cumberland, Elme Marietta
2023: Elme Druid Hills
(2)Non-residential: Includes revenues and expenses from retail operations at residential properties.
(3)Other (classified as continuing operations): Watergate 600
2017 Office – Watergate 600
2016 Multifamily – Riverside Apartments
| |
(2)
| Development/redevelopment properties: |
Office redevelopment properties – Army Navy Building
2017 Office – Braddock Metro Center
Sold:
2017 Multifamily – Walker House Apartments
2016 Office – Maryland Office Portfolio (6110 Executive Boulevard, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Wayne Plaza, West Gude Drive, 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza)
Real Estate Rental Revenue
Real estate rental revenue from our apartment communities is comprised of (a) minimum base rent which includes rental revenuesfrom operating leases of residential apartments with terms of approximately one year or less, recognized on a straight-line basis, (b) revenue from the recovery of operating expenses from our tenants,residents, (c) provisions for doubtful accounts in the same quarter that we established the receivable, which include provisions for straight-linecredit losses on lease related receivables, (d) revenue from the collectionleases of lease termination feesretail space at our apartment
communities and (e) parking and other tenant charges such as percentage rents.charges.
Real estate rental revenue for same-store properties for the two years ended December 31, 2017 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Minimum base rent | $ | 227,661 |
| | $ | 218,769 |
| | $ | 8,892 |
| | 4.1 | % |
| Recoveries from tenants | 31,297 |
| | 31,064 |
| | 233 |
| | 0.8 | % |
| Provision for doubtful accounts | (1,191 | ) | | (960 | ) | | (231 | ) | | 24.1 | % |
| Lease termination fees | 1,881 |
| | 1,350 |
| | 531 |
| | 39.3 | % |
| Parking and other tenant charges | 10,392 |
| | 9,332 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 11.4 | % |
| Total same-store real estate rental revenue | $ | 270,040 |
| | $ | 259,555 |
| | $ | 10,485 |
| | 4.0 | % |
Minimum base rent: Increase primarily due to higher rental income ($10.3 million), partially offset by higher abatements ($1.1 million) and amortization of capitalized lease incentives ($0.3 million).
Recoveries from tenants: Increase primarily due to higher reimbursements for operating expenses ($0.4 million), partially offset by lower reimbursements for real estate taxes ($0.1 million).
Provision for doubtful accounts: Increase primarily due to higher provisions in the retail segment ($0.2 million).
Lease termination fees: Increase primarily due to higher fees in the retail ($0.3 million) and office ($0.2 million) segments.
Parking and other tenant charges: Increase primarily due to higher parking income.
Real estate rental revenue from same-store residential properties by segmentincreased $11.5 million, or 6.6%, to $186.0 million for the two years ended December 31, 2017 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Office | $ | 137,447 |
| | $ | 128,815 |
| | $ | 8,632 |
| | 6.7 | % |
| Multifamily | 70,203 |
| | 69,174 |
| | 1,029 |
| | 1.5 | % |
| Retail | 62,390 |
| | 61,566 |
| | 824 |
| | 1.3 | % |
| Total same-store real estate rental revenue | $ | 270,040 |
| | $ | 259,555 |
| | $ | 10,485 |
| | 4.0 | % |
Office: Increase2023, compared to $174.5 million for 2022, primarily due to higher rental income ($9.210.4 million), parkinghigher recoveries ($1.1 million), lower rent abatements ($0.5 million) and higher fee and ancillary income ($0.40.8 million) and lease termination fees ($0.2 million),. The increase is partially offset by higher rent abatementscredit losses ($1.51.3 million).
Multifamily: Increase primarily due to higher rental income ($1.0 million).
Retail: Increase primarily due to higher reimbursements ($0.3 million) and lease termination fees ($0.3 million).
Real estate rental revenue from acquisitions increased due$7.5 million or 50.2% to the acquisition of Watergate 600 ($14.5 million) in 2017 and having the full year impact of the Riverside Apartments acquisition ($9.2 million) in 2016.
Real estate rental revenue from development/redevelopment properties decreased primarily due$22.4 million for 2023, compared to lower revenue ($0.4 million) at the Army Navy Building, which was under redevelopment and substantially completed redevelopment activities during 2017.
Real estate rental revenue from held$14.9 million for sale or sold properties decreased2022, primarily due to the saleacquisitions of Elme Druid Hills ($2.6 million) during the Maryland Office Portfoliothird quarter of 2023, Elme Marietta ($20.3 million) in 2016, the non-renewal of a large tenant at Braddock Metro Center ($1.02.6 million) and Elme Cumberland ($1.7 million) during the salesecond quarter of Walker House Apartments2022, and Elme Sandy Springs ($0.70.6 million) in 2017.during the first quarter of 2022.
Ending occupancy represents occupied square footage indicated as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period. EndingAverage occupancy for residential properties classified as continuing operations by segment for the two years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 | | % Change |
| Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total |
| 95.6 | % | | 93.1 | % | | 95.2 | % | | 95.4 | % | | 94.2 | % | | 95.3 | % | | 0.2 | % | | (1.1) | % | | (0.1) | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Increase (decrease) |
| Segment | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total |
| Office | 93.1 | % | | 77.3 | % | | 90.1 | % | | 91.7 | % | | 87.3 | % | | 91.1 | % | | 1.4 | % | | (10.0 | )% | | (1.0 | )% |
| Multifamily | 93.6 | % | | 95.3 | % | | 94.1 | % | | 95.3 | % | | 92.5 | % | | 94.5 | % | | (1.7 | )% | | 2.8 | % | | (0.4 | )% |
| Retail | 91.2 | % | | N/A |
| | 91.2 | % | | 95.7 | % | | N/A |
| | 95.7 | % | | (4.5 | )% | | N/A |
| | (4.5 | )% |
| Total | 92.7 | % | | 87.5 | % | | 91.8 | % | | 94.0 | % | | 91.0 | % | | 93.5 | % | | (1.3 | )% | | (3.5 | )% | | (1.7 | )% |
Office: The increase in same-store endingaverage occupancy was primarily due to higher endingaverage occupancy at Fairgate at Ballston, 1776 G StreetElme Bethesda, The Paramount, Roosevelt Towers, Riverside Apartments and Silverline Center,The Maxwell. The increase is partially offset by lower endingaverage occupancy at Quantico Corporate Center. The decrease in non-same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to the non-renewal of a large tenant at Braddock Metro Center.
Elme Eagles Landing, Elme Manassas and Elme Conyers.Multifamily: The decrease in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to lower ending occupancy at The Ashby at McLean and Kenmore Apartments.
Retail: The decrease in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to lower ending occupancy at Frederick Crossing and Centre at Hagerstown.
During 2017, we executed new and renewal leases in our office and retail segments as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Square Feet (in millions) | | Average Rental Rate (per square foot) | | % Rental Rate Increase | | Leasing Costs (1) (per square foot) | | Free Rent (weighted average months) | | Retention Rate |
| Office | 0.5 |
| | $ | 43.63 |
| | 8.8 | % | | $ | 81.25 |
| | 9.2 |
| | 51.4 | % |
| Retail | 0.3 |
| | 29.20 |
| | 16.5 | % | | 12.81 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 66.9 | % |
| Total | 0.8 |
| | 38.35 |
| | 10.8 | % | | 56.18 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 57.2 | % |
(1) Consist of tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
The low retention rate in the office segment is primarily due to the non-renewal of a large tenant at Braddock Metro Center. We executed a lease with a new tenant for that space, and subsequently sold the property during the first quarter of 2018.
Real Estate Expenses
RealResidential real estate expenses as a percentage of residential revenue for the two years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022 were 35.6% and 36.7%36.1%, respectively.
Real estate expenses from same-store residential properties by segmentincreased $2.2 million, or 3.6%, to $65.1 million for the two years ended December 31, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Office | $ | 51,761 |
| | $ | 50,159 |
| | $ | 1,602 |
| | 3.2 | % |
| Multifamily | 27,203 |
| | 27,655 |
| | (452 | ) | | (1.6 | )% |
| Retail | 15,186 |
| | 15,860 |
| | (674 | ) | | (4.2 | )% |
| Total same-store real estate expenses | $ | 94,150 |
| | $ | 93,674 |
| | $ | 476 |
| | 0.5 | % |
Office: Increase2023, compared to $62.8 million for 2022, primarily due to higher real estate taxutilities ($0.9 million), custodialcontract services ($0.5 million), real estate taxes ($0.5 million), marketing ($0.4 million) and insurance ($0.4 million) expenses. The increase is partially offset by lower administrative ($0.3 million) expenses.
Multifamily: Decrease primarily due to lower utilities ($0.2 million),and repairs and maintenance ($0.2 million) expenses.
Real estate expenses from acquisitions increased $3.5 million in 2023 due to the acquisitions of Elme Druid Hills ($0.9 million) during the third quarter of 2023, Elme Sandy Springs ($1.0 million) during the first quarter of 2022 and snow removalElme Marietta ($0.9 million) and Elme Cumberland ($0.7 million) during the second quarter of 2022.
Other NOI
Other NOI decreased due to lower net operating income at Watergate 600 ($0.3 million).
Other Income and Expenses
Property management expenses: Increase of $0.7 million primarily due to higher management fee expenses at same-store properties ($0.4 million) and due to the acquisitions of Elme Druid Hills ($0.1 million) expenses.
during the third quarter of 2023 and Elme Marietta ($0.1 million) and Elme Cumberland ($0.1 million) during the second quarter of 2022.
RetailGeneral and administrative expenses: Decrease of $2.4 million primarily due to higher management fee offset ($4.7 million), lower incentive compensation ($2.4 million) and an adjustment to deferred taxes ($0.5 million) in 2023. The decrease is partially offset by higher payroll ($2.0 million), computer software ($0.9 million), professional services fees ($0.7 million), employee benefits ($0.5 million), severance ($0.5 million), corporate office moving ($0.5 million), and other ($0.2 million) expenses.
Transformation costs: Decrease of $3.3 million primarily due to lower bad debtconsulting ($0.41.9 million), lower accelerated depreciation ($0.9 million), lower salary, benefit, and snow removalincentive compensation ($0.6 million), lower software implementation ($0.5 million), and lower third-party management transition ($0.3 million) expenses.
costs. The decrease is partially offset by higher signing bonuses for new employees ($0.9 million).
Other Expenses
Depreciation and Amortizationamortization: IncreaseDecrease of $2.8 million primarily due to the Watergate 600 acquisition ($7.6 million) and higherlower depreciation and amortization at same-store residential properties ($2.0 million), partially offset by dispositionsthe acquisitions of Elme Sandy Springs ($3.81.7 million), Elme Marietta ($1.5 million) and Elme Cumberland ($0.3 million) and lower depreciation and amortization at Riverside Apartments ($1.6 million), Braddock Metro CenterWatergate 600 ($0.4 million) and Army Navy Building ($0.2 million) due to lower amortization of acquired intangible lease assets.
Acquisition Costs:. The acquisition costs in 2016 are related to the acquisition of Riverside Apartments. We capitalized the costs associated with the acquisition of Watergate 600 in 2017 due to accounting for the transaction as an asset acquisition in accordance with the adoption of ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.
General and Administrative Expenses: Increase primarily due to higher share based compensation expense ($1.4 million) due to a higher volume of forfeitures in 2016, higher non-share based incentive compensation ($1.3 million) due to improved forecasted operating results, and higher expenses related to an information systems upgrade ($1.0 million),decrease is partially offset by lower professional feeshigher depreciation and amortization at Elme Druid Hills ($0.53.1 million).
Real estate (impairment) and casualty gain, net: The real estate impairment losses of $24.1 million and $9.1 million in 2017 reduced the carrying values of 2445 M Street and Braddock Metro Center, respectively (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). The casualty gain in 2016 represents the gain recognized upon the receipt of insurance proceeds related to damage from a fire at Bethesda Hill Towers during the first quarter of 2015 that damaged four units.
Gain on sale of real estate: Decrease due to completion of the sales of Dulles Station II, 6110 Executive Boulevard, 51 Monroe Street, 600 Jefferson Plaza, West Gude Drive, 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza during 2016, as compared to the sale of Walker House Apartments in 2017.
Interest Expense: Interest expense by debt type for the two years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts)thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| Debt Type | 2023 | | 2022 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Notes payable | $ | 23,152 | | | $ | 20,458 | | | $ | 2,694 | | | 13.2 | % |
| Mortgage notes payable | — | | | 1,014 | | | (1,014) | | | 100.0 | % |
| Line of credit | 7,277 | | | 3,751 | | | 3,526 | | | 94.0 | % |
| Capitalized interest | — | | | (283) | | | 283 | | | 100.0 | % |
| Total | $ | 30,429 | | | $ | 24,940 | | | $ | 5,489 | | | 22.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| Debt Type | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Notes payable | $ | 37,487 |
| | $ | 33,439 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
| | 12.1 | % |
| Mortgage notes payable | 4,804 |
| | 14,654 |
| | (9,850 | ) | | (67.2 | )% |
| Lines of credit | 6,207 |
| | 5,701 |
| | 506 |
| | 8.9 | % |
| Capitalized interest | (964 | ) | | (668 | ) | | (296 | ) | | 44.3 | % |
| Total | $ | 47,534 |
| | $ | 53,126 |
| | $ | (5,592 | ) | | (10.5 | )% |
•Notes payable: Increase primarily due to executing the $150.0$125.0 million term loan2023 Term Loan executed in 2016, which hasJanuary 2023, partially offset by prepayment of a floating interest rate effectively fixed at 2.9% by interest rate swaps. We borrowed $100.0 million onportion of the term loan2018 Term Loan in the fourth quarter of 2016, and borrowed the remaining $50.0 million during the first quarter of 2017.
January 2023.•Mortgage notes payable: Decrease primarily due to the repaymentmortgages of $42.8 million and $33.7 million assumed in the acquisitions of Elme Marietta and Elme Cumberland, respectively, in the second quarter of 2022 and the extinguishment, in September 2022, of the mortgage notes secured by John Marshall II, 3801 Connecticut Avenue, Bethesda Hill Apartments, Walker House Apartments, 2445 M Street and the Army Navy Building in 2017 and 2016.
liabilities associated with these mortgages though defeasance arrangements.Lines•Line of credit: Increase primarily due to a weighted average interest rate of 2.54% during 2017,6.2% and weighted average borrowings of $70.6 million in 2023, as compared to 1.64% during 2016.
a weighted average interest rate of 4.2% and weighted average borrowings of $21.6 million in 2022.•Capitalized interest: Increase primarily due to capitalization of interest on spending related to the Trove, the multifamily development adjacent to The Wellington.
Income tax benefit: The income tax benefit in 2016 resulted from a reduction of the valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset at one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries due to a net operating loss as a result of the sale of Dulles Station II. The income tax benefit in 2017 results from the anticipated income at the TRS and the corresponding usage of the net operating loss.
2016 Compared to 2015
The following tables reconcile NOI to net income attributable to the controlling interests and provide the basis for our discussion of our consolidated results of operations and NOI in 2016 compared to 2015. All amounts are in thousands except percentage amounts.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Non-Same-Store | | | | | | | | |
| | Same-Store | | | | | | Acquisitions (1) | | Development/Redevelopment (2) | | Held for Sale or Sold (3) | | All Properties | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | $
Change | | %
Change |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 243,858 |
| | $ | 239,865 |
| | $ | 3,993 |
| | 1.7 | % | | $ | 26,477 |
| | $ | 6,797 |
| | $ | 22,662 |
| | $ | 18,952 |
| | $ | 20,267 |
| | $ | 40,813 |
| | $ | 313,264 |
| | $ | 306,427 |
| | $ | 6,837 |
| | 2.2 | % |
| Real estate expenses | 86,814 |
| | 84,708 |
| | 2,106 |
| | 2.5 | % | | 10,706 |
| | 2,708 |
| | 9,997 |
| | 9,394 |
| | 7,496 |
| | 15,424 |
| | 115,013 |
| | 112,234 |
| | 2,779 |
| | 2.5 | % |
| NOI | $ | 157,044 |
| | $ | 155,157 |
| | $ | 1,887 |
| | 1.2 | % | | $ | 15,771 |
| | $ | 4,089 |
| | $ | 12,665 |
| | $ | 9,558 |
| | $ | 12,771 |
| | $ | 25,389 |
| | $ | 198,251 |
| | $ | 194,193 |
| | $ | 4,058 |
| | 2.1 | % |
| Reconciliation to net income attributable to the controlling interests: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (108,406 | ) | | (108,935 | ) | | 529 |
| | (0.5 | )% |
| Acquisition costs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,178 | ) | | (2,056 | ) | | 878 |
| | (42.7 | )% |
| General and administrative expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (19,545 | ) | | (20,123 | ) | | 578 |
| | (2.9 | )% |
| Casualty gain and real estate (impairment), net | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 676 |
| | (5,909 | ) | | 6,585 |
| | (111.4 | )% |
| Gain on sale of real estate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 101,704 |
| | 91,107 |
| | 10,597 |
| | 11.6 | % |
| Interest expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (53,126 | ) | | (59,546 | ) | | 6,420 |
| | (10.8 | )% |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 297 |
| | 709 |
| | (412 | ) | | (58.1 | )% |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — |
| | (119 | ) | | 119 |
| | (100.0 | )% |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 615 |
| | (134 | ) | | 749 |
| | (559.0 | )% |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 119,288 |
| | 89,187 |
| | 30,101 |
| | 33.8 | % |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 51 |
| | 553 |
| | (502 | ) | | (90.8 | )% |
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 119,339 |
| | $ | 89,740 |
| | $ | 29,599 |
| | 33.0 | % |
2016 Multifamily – Riverside Apartments
2015 Multifamily – The Wellington
| |
(2)
| Development/redevelopment properties: |
Multifamily development property – The Maxwell
Office redevelopment properties – Silverline Center and Army Navy Building
2016 Office – 6110 Executive Boulevard, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Wayne Plaza, West Gude Drive, 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza
2015 Multifamily – Country Club Towers and Munson Hill Towers
2015 Retail – Montgomery Village Center
Real Estate Rental Revenue
Real estate rental revenue for same-store properties for the two years ended December 31, 2016 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Minimum base rent | $ | 202,965 |
| | $ | 201,571 |
| | $ | 1,394 |
| | 0.7 | % |
| Recoveries from tenants | 29,642 |
| | 28,558 |
| | 1,084 |
| | 3.8 | % |
| Provision for doubtful accounts | (909 | ) | | (1,455 | ) | | 546 |
| | (37.5 | )% |
| Lease termination fees | 1,032 |
| | 1,196 |
| | (164 | ) | | (13.7 | )% |
| Parking and other tenant charges | 11,128 |
| | 9,995 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 11.3 | % |
| Total same-store real estate rental revenue | $ | 243,858 |
| | $ | 239,865 |
| | $ | 3,993 |
| | 1.7 | % |
Minimum base rent: Increase primarily due to higher rental rates ($3.5 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($1.2 million), higher abatements ($0.6 million) and lower amortization of net intangible lease liabilities ($0.3 million).
Recoveries from tenants: Increase primarily due to higher reimbursements for operating expenses ($0.7 million) and real estate taxes ($0.3 million) due to higher expenses.
Provision for doubtful accounts: Decrease primarily due to lower provisions in the office segment ($0.6 million).
Lease termination fees: Decrease primarily due to lower fees in the retail ($0.2 million) and office ($0.1 million) segments, partially offset by higher fees in the multifamily ($0.2 million) segment.
Parking and other tenant charges: Increase primarily due to higher parking income ($0.6 million) primarily in the office segment, move-in charges ($0.1 million) in the multifamily segment and short term rent ($0.1 million) and percentage rent ($0.1 million) in the retail segment.
Real estate rental revenue from same-store properties by segment for the two years ended December 31, 2016 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Office | $ | 126,959 |
| | $ | 124,963 |
| | $ | 1,996 |
| | 1.6 | % |
| Multifamily | 55,333 |
| | 54,502 |
| | 831 |
| | 1.5 | % |
| Retail | 61,566 |
| | 60,400 |
| | 1,166 |
| | 1.9 | % |
| Total same-store real estate rental revenue | $ | 243,858 |
| | $ | 239,865 |
| | $ | 3,993 |
| | 1.7 | % |
Office: Increase primarily due to higher rental rates ($2.1 million), lower provisions for uncollectible accounts ($0.6 million), and higher parking income ($0.4 million), partially offset by higher rent abatements ($1.0 million) and lower occupancy ($0.1 million).
Multifamily: Increase primarily due to higher occupancy ($0.3 million), lower rent abatements ($0.3 million) and higher rental rates ($0.2 million).
Retail: Increase primarily due to higher rental rates ($1.2 million), reimbursements ($1.1 million), percentage rent ($0.1 million) and parking income ($0.1 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($1.4 million).
Real estate rental revenue from acquisitions increased due to the acquisition of Riverside Apartments ($13.1 million) in 2016 and having the full year impact of The Wellington acquisition ($6.6 million) in 2015.
Real estate rental revenue from development/redevelopment properties increased primarily due to higher occupancy at Silverline Center ($3.1 million) and The Maxwell ($2.3 million), partially offset by lower occupancy ($1.6 million) at the Army Navy Building, which was under redevelopment.
Ending occupancy represents occupied square footage indicated as a percentage of total square footage as of the last day of that period. Ending occupancy for properties classified as continuing operations by segment for the two years ended December 31, 2016 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | Increase (decrease) |
| Segment | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total | | Same-Store | | Non-Same-Store | | Total |
| Office | 92.1 | % | | 86.5 | % | | 91.1 | % | | 91.0 | % | | 82.0 | % | | 87.6 | % | | 1.1 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 3.5 | % |
| Multifamily | 96.0 | % | | 92.9 | % | | 94.5 | % | | 94.3 | % | | 91.6 | % | | 93.4 | % | | 1.7 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 1.1 | % |
| Retail | 95.7 | % | | N/A |
| | 95.7 | % | | 91.5 | % | | N/A |
| | 91.5 | % | | 4.2 | % | | N/A |
| | 4.2 | % |
| Total | 94.3 | % | | 91.3 | % | | 93.5 | % | | 92.1 | % | | 85.4 | % | | 90.2 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 5.9 | % | | 3.3 | % |
Office: The increase in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to higher occupancy at 1775 Eye Street, 1600 Wilson Boulevard and 1776 G Street, partially offset by lower occupancy at Monument II. The increase in non-same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to higher occupancy at Silverline Center, partially offset by lower occupancy at the Army Navy Building.
Multifamily: The increase in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to higher occupancy at 3801 Connecticut Avenue and The Ashby. The increase in non-same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to the lease-up of The Maxwell.
Retail: The increase in same-store ending occupancy was primarily due to higher occupancy at Chevy Chase Metro Center, Bradlee Shopping Center and Montrose Shopping Center.
During 2016, we executed new and renewal leases in our office and retail segments as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Square Feet (in millions) | | Average Rental Rate (per square foot) | | % Rental Rate Increase | | Leasing Costs (1)
(per square foot) | | Free Rent (weighted average months) | | Retention Rate |
| Office | 0.6 |
| | $ | 41.67 |
| | 13.2 | % | | $ | 41.24 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 67.1 | % |
| Retail | 0.2 |
| | 31.32 |
| | 19.4 | % | | 11.89 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 82.4 | % |
| Total | 0.8 |
| | 38.96 |
| | 14.5 | % | | 33.54 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 71.4 | % |
(1) Consist of tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Real Estate Expenses
Real estate expenses as a percentage of revenue for the two years ended December 31, 2016 were 36.7% and 36.6%, respectively.
Real estate expenses from same-store properties by segment for the two years ended December 31, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Office | $ | 48,312 |
| | $ | 47,385 |
| | $ | 927 |
| | 2.0 | % |
| Multifamily | 22,642 |
| | 22,660 |
| | (18 | ) | | (0.1 | )% |
| Retail | 15,860 |
| | 14,663 |
| | 1,197 |
| | 8.2 | % |
| Total same-store real estate expenses | $ | 86,814 |
| | $ | 84,708 |
| | $ | 2,106 |
| | 2.5 | % |
Office: Increase primarily due to higher real estate taxes ($0.3 million), repairs and maintenance ($0.3 million), operating services and supplies ($0.3 million) and bad debt ($0.2 million) expenses, partially offset by lower utilities expenses ($0.4 million) due to lower usage of electricity.
Multifamily: Slight decrease primarily due to lower property management ($0.2 million) and administrative ($0.2 million) expenses, offset by higher bad debt expense ($0.3 million) related to a retail restaurant tenant at Bennett Park.
Retail: Increase primarily due to higher real estate tax ($0.7 million), legal ($0.1 million), advertising ($0.1 million), repairs and maintenance ($0.1 million) and common area maintenance ($0.1 million) expenses.
Other Expenses
Depreciation and Amortization: Decrease primarily due to dispositions ($8.2 million), partially offset by acquisitions ($7.0 million) and higher depreciation at development/redevelopment properties ($0.8 million).
Acquisition Costs: Decrease primarily due to lower costs associated with the Riverside Apartments acquisition in 2016 as compared to The Wellington acquisition in 2015.
General and Administrative Expenses: Decrease primarily due to lower share-based compensation ($1.5 million) primarily due to a higher number of forfeitures during 2016 and lower consulting fees ($0.3 million), partially offset by a higher estimate of short-term incentive compensation ($0.8 million) and severance and retention expenses ($0.6 million) associated with the disposition of the Maryland Office Portfolio.
Real estate impairment and casualty (gain), net: The casualty gain in 2016 represents the gain recognized upon the receipt of insurance proceeds related to damage from a fire at Bethesda Hill Towers during the first quarter of 2015 that damaged four units. An impairment loss in the second quarter of 2015 reduced the carrying value of our interest in a joint venture to develop a multifamily property at 1225 First Street to its estimated fair value. We subsequently disposed of our interest in the joint venture during 2015.
Gain on sale of real estate: Increase due to completion of the sales of Dulles Station II and the Maryland Office Portfolio during 2016, as compared to the gains on the sale of Country Club Towers, Munson Hill Towers and Montgomery Village Center during 2015.
Interest Expense: Interest expense by debt type for the two years ended December 31, 2016 was as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | |
| Debt Type | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Notes payable | $ | 33,439 |
| | $ | 32,730 |
| | $ | 709 |
| | 2.2 | % |
| Mortgage notes payable | 14,654 |
| | 22,684 |
| | (8,030 | ) | | (35.4 | )% |
| Lines of credit | 5,701 |
| | 4,790 |
| | 911 |
| | 19.0 | % |
| Capitalized interest | (668 | ) | | (658 | ) | | (10 | ) | | 1.5 | % |
| Total | $ | 53,126 |
| | $ | 59,546 |
| | $ | (6,420 | ) | | (10.8 | )% |
Notes payable: Increase primarily due to executing a $150.0 million term loan in September 2015 and borrowing $100.0 million on another term loan facility in December 2016, partially offset by the repayment of $150.0 million of our 5.35% senior notes in May 2015.
Mortgage notes payable: Decrease primarily due to the repayment of the mortgage notes secured by John Marshall II, 3801 Connecticut Avenue, Bethesda Hill Apartments, Walker House Apartments and 2445 M Street, and the purchase of the construction loan secured by The Maxwell (a consolidated entity) during 2016.
Lines of credit: Increase primarily due to weighted average daily borrowings of $215.0 million during 2017, as compared to $167.6 million during 2016.
Capitalized interest: Small increase primarily due toceasing capitalization of interest on spending related to the multifamily development adjacent to The Wellington, offset by placing into service our development project at The Maxwell and redevelopment project at Silverline Center.
Income tax benefit (expense): The income tax benefit in 2016 resulted from a reduction of the valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset at one of our taxable REIT subsidiariesRiverside Apartments due to a net operating loss aspause in development activities resulting from macroeconomic uncertainty.
Loss on extinguishment of debt: During 2022, we extinguished the liabilities associated with mortgage notes payable for Elme Marietta and Elme Cumberland through defeasance arrangements, recognizing aggregate losses on extinguishment of debt of $4.9 million.
Other income: Decrease of $0.1 million is due to lower tax refunds received in 2023 for office properties sold in prior years.
Real estate impairment: The real estate impairment charge of $41.9 million during 2023 reduced the carrying value of Watergate 600 to its estimated fair value (see note 3 to consolidated financial statements).
2022 Compared to 2021
For a resultdiscussion comparing the Company’s financial condition and results of operations for the saleyear ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, refer to subsection “Results of Dulles Station II.
Operations - 2022 Compared to 2021” of Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe we will have adequate liquidity over the next twelve months to operate our business and to meet our cash requirements, including meeting our debt obligations, capital and contractual obligations, as well as the payment of dividends, and funding possible growth opportunities.
In connection with our strategic transformation, we redesigned our operating model for purposes of more efficiently and effectively supporting residential operations. We recognized $6.3 million and $9.7 million and $6.6 million of transformation costs, net of amounts capitalized, on the consolidated statements of operations during 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We expect to realize significant operational benefits from this operating model redesign. We also believe we have adequate liquidity beyond 2023, with no debt maturities until 2025 and only $282.0 million of scheduled debt maturities prior to 2028, based on current amounts outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility.
We will continue to assess the payment of our dividends on a quarterly basis. Future determinations regarding the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board which considers, among other factors, trends in our levels of funds from operations and ongoing capital requirements to achieve a targeted payout ratio.
Capital Structure
We manage our capital structure to reflect a long-term investment approach, generally seeking to match the cash flow of our assets with a mix of equity and various debt instruments. We expect that our capital structure will allow us to obtain additional capital from diverse sources that could include additional equity offerings of common shares, public and private secured and unsecured debt financings, asset dispositions, operating units and joint venture equity. Our ability to raise funds through the incurrence of debt and issuance of equity securities is dependent on, among other things, general economic conditions including general market conditions for REITs, our operating performance, our debt rating, and the current trading price of our common shares.shares and other capital market conditions. We analyze which source of capital we believe to be most advantageous to us at any particular point in time.
As of February 15, 2018,13, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $19.1$5.8 million and availability under our Revolving Credit Facility of $257.0$535.0 million.We currently expect that our potential sources of liquidity for acquisitions, development, redevelopment, expansion and renovation of properties, and operating and administrative expenses, may include:
•Cash flow from operations;
•Borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility or other new short-term facilities;
•Issuances of our equity securities and/or common units in operating partnerships;
•Issuances of preferred shares;
•Proceeds from long-term secured or unsecured debt financings, including construction loans and term loans;loans, or the issuance of debt securities;
•Investment from joint venture partners; and
•Net proceeds from the sale of assets.
During 2018,2024, we expect that we will have significant capital requirements, including the following items:following:
•Funding dividends and distributions to our shareholders;shareholders (which we intend to continue to pay at or about current levels);
$31.6 million to repay or refinance a secured note that is prepayable without penalty in 2018;
•Approximately $85$34.0 - $95$39.0 million to invest in our existing portfolio of operating assets including approximately $30inclusive of $23.0 - $35$28.0 million to fund tenant-relatedof major capital requirementsexpenditures; and leasing commissions;
Approximately $45 - $50 million to invest in our development and redevelopment projects; and
•Funding for potential property acquisitions throughout 2018,2024, offset by proceeds from potential property dispositions.
There can be no assurance that our capital requirements will not be materially higher or lower than the above expectations. We currently believe that we will generate sufficient cash flow from operations and expectedpotential property sales and have access to the capital resources necessary to fund our requirements in 2018.2024. However, as a result of the uncertainty of the general market conditions in the greater Washington, DC metro region,and Sunbelt regions, economic conditions affecting the ability to attract and retain residents and tenants rising interestor achieve anticipated rental rates, or declines in our share price, unfavorable changes in the supply of competing properties, or our properties not performing as expected, we may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and property sales or otherwise have access to capital on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain capital from other sources, we may need to alter capital spending to be materially different than what is stated in the prior paragraph.above. If capital were not available, we may be unable to satisfy the distribution requirement applicable to REITs, make required principal and interest payments, make strategic acquisitions or make necessary and/or routine capital improvements or undertake improvement/redevelopment
opportunities with respect to our existing portfolio of operating assets.
Debt Financing
We generally use secured or unsecured, corporate-level debt, including unsecured notes, our Revolving Credit Facility, bank term loans and mortgages, to meet our borrowing needs. Long-term, we generally use fixed rate debt instruments in order to match the returns from our real estate assets. If we issue unsecured debt in the future, we will seek to ladder the maturities of our debt to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk in any particular future year. We also utilize variable rate debt for short-term financing purposes. At times, our mix of variable and fixed rate debt may not suit our needs. At those times, we may use derivative financial instruments including interest rate swaps and caps, forward interest rate options or interest rate options in order to assist us in managing our debt mix. We may either hedge our variable rate debt to give it an effective fixed interest rate or hedge fixed rate debt to give it an effective variable interest rate.
AtAs of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2023, our debt was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
Mortgage notes payable, net (1) | $ | 95,141 |
| | $ | 148,540 |
|
Unsecured lines of credit payable (1) | 166,000 |
| | 120,000 |
|
Unsecured notes payable, net (1) | 894,358 |
| | 843,084 |
|
| | $ | 1,155,499 |
| | $ | 1,111,624 |
|
(1) See notes 4, 5 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further detail on our debt.
Our future debt principal payments are scheduled as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | Mortgage Notes Payable | | Unsecured Notes Payable | | Unsecured Line of Credit Payable | | Total Debt |
2018 (1) | $ | 34,544 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 34,544 |
|
| 2019 | 2,500 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,500 |
|
| 2020 | 2,659 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 166,000 |
| | 418,659 |
|
| 2021 | 2,829 |
| | 150,000 |
| | — |
| | 152,829 |
|
| 2022 | 46,984 |
| | 300,000 |
| | — |
| | 346,984 |
|
| Thereafter | 2,398 |
| | 200,000 |
| | — |
| | 202,398 |
|
| | 91,914 |
| | 900,000 |
| | 166,000 |
| | 1,157,914 |
|
| Premiums and discounts, net | 3,385 |
| | (1,580 | ) | | — |
| | 1,805 |
|
| Debt issuance costs, net | (158 | ) | | (4,062 | ) | | — |
| | (4,220 | ) |
| Total | $ | 95,141 |
| | $ | 894,358 |
| | $ | 166,000 |
| | $ | 1,155,499 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | | | Unsecured Notes Payable/Term Loans | | Revolving Credit Facility | | Total Debt | | Average Interest Rate |
| 2024 | | | — | | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | % |
| 2025 | | | 125,000 | | (1) | 157,000 | | (2) | 282,000 | | | 5.6 | % |
| 2026 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | % |
| 2027 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | % |
| 2028 | | | 50,000 | | | — | | | 50,000 | | | 7.4 | % |
| Thereafter | | | 350,000 | | | — | | | 350,000 | | | 4.1 | % |
| Scheduled principal payments | | | 525,000 | | | 157,000 | | | 682,000 | | | 4.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Premiums and discounts, net | | | (94) | | | — | | | (94) | | | |
| Debt issuance costs, net | | | (2,561) | | | — | | | (2,561) | | | |
| Total | | | $ | 522,345 | | | $ | 157,000 | | | $ | 679,345 | | | 4.9 | % |
(1)During the first quarter of 2023, we entered into the $125.0 million 2023 Term Loan with an interest rate of SOFR (subject to a credit spread adjustment of 10 basis points) plus a margin of 95 basis points (subject to adjustment depending on Elme Communities’ credit rating). The 2023 Term Loan has a two-year term ending in January 2025, with two one-year extension options. We used the proceeds to prepay the $100.0 million 2018 Term Loan in full and a portion of our borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Elme Communities had previously entered into an interest rate swap to effectively fix the interest rate for the remaining $100.0 million portion of the 2018 Term Loan. Following the prepayment of the 2018 Term Loan, the interest rate swap effectively fixed a $100.0 million portion of the 2023 Term Loan at 2.16% through the interest rate swap's expiration date of July 21, 2023. In March 2023, we entered into two interest rate swap arrangements with an aggregate notional amount of $125.0 million that effectively fixed the 2023 Term Loan’s interest rate at 4.73% beginning on July 21, 2023 through the 2023 Term Loan’s maturity date of the mortgage note secured by Kenmore Apartments is March 1, 2019, but can be prepaid, without penalty, beginning on September 1, 2018.January 10, 2025.
(2)The credit facility's term ends in August 2025, with two six-month extension options.
The weighted average maturity for our debt was 4.5 years as of December 31, 2023. If principal amounts due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flow may be insufficient to repay all maturing debt. Prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of a refinancing, such as possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans, may result in higher interest rates and increased interest expense or inhibit our ability to finance our obligations.
Mortgage DebtFrom time to time, we may seek to repurchase and cancel our outstanding unsecured notes and term loans through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Debt Covenants
Pursuant to the terms of our mortgage notes payable bore an effective weighted average fair value interest rate of 4.5% and had a weighted average maturity of 3.3 years. We may either initiate secured mortgage debt or assume mortgage debt from time-to-time in conjunction with property acquisitions.
Unsecured Credit Facility and Term Loan
During the second quarter of 2015, we terminated our $100.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in June 2015 and our $400.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2016, and executed a new $600.0 million unsecured credit agreement ("Revolving Credit Facility") that matures in June 2019, unless extended pursuant to one or both of the two six-month extension options. The Revolving Credit Facility, is our primary source of liquidity. We can borrow up to $600.0 million under this line, which bears interest at an adjustable spread over LIBOR based on our public debt rating. The Revolving Credit Facility has an accordion feature that allows us to increase the facility to $1.0 billion,2023 Term Loan and unsecured notes, we are subject to the extent the lenders agree to provide additional revolving loan commitments or term loans. The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a ratecustomary operating covenants and maintenance of either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.55% or the base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.0% to 0.55% (in each case depending upon our credit rating). The base rate is the highest of the administrative agent's prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and the LIBOR market index rate plus 1.0%. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.30% (depending on our credit rating) on the $600.0 million committed capacity, without regard to usage. As of December 31, 2017, the interest rate on the facility is LIBOR plus 1.00% and the facility fee is 0.20%.various financial ratios.
During the third quarter of 2015, we executed a $150.0 million unsecured term loan by exercising a portion of the accordion feature under the Revolving Credit Facility. The term loan has a 5.5 year term scheduled to mature on March 15, 2021 and currently has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 110 basis points, based on our current unsecured debt ratings. We entered into two interest rate
swap arrangements with a total notional amount of $150.0 million to swap the floating interest rate to an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.72% starting on October 15, 2015 and extending until the maturity of the term loan on March 15, 2021.
Our Revolving Credit Facility contains financial and other covenants with which we must comply. Some of these covenants include:
A maximum ratio of 60.0% of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated total asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets;
A maximum ratio of 40.0% of secured indebtedness to consolidated total asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets;
A minimum ratio of 1.50 of quarterly adjusted EBITDA (earnings before noncontrolling interests, interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, acquisition costs, and extraordinary, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses) to consolidated fixed charges, including interest expense;
A minimum ratio of 1.75 of adjusted net operating income from our unencumbered properties to consolidated unsecured interest expense; and
A maximum ratio of 60.0% of total unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value, calculated using an estimate of fair market value of our assets.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our Revolving Credit Facility, 2023 Term Loan, unsecured notes or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our Revolving Credit Facility's covenants.debt instruments. This could cause our lenders to accelerate the timing of payments and wouldcould therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, our ability to draw on our Revolving Credit Facility or incur other unsecured debt in the future could be restricted by the Revolving Credit Facility'sdebt covenants.
As of December 31, 2017,2023, we were in compliance with the Revolving Credit Facility's covenants.
Unsecured Notes
We generally issue unsecured notescovenants related to fund our real estate assets long-term. In issuing future unsecured notes, we seek to ladder the maturities of our debt to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk in any particular future year.
During the third quarter of 2016, we entered into a seven year, $150.0 million unsecured term loan ("2016 Term Loan") maturing on July 21, 2023 with a deferred draw period of up to six months commencing on July 22, 2016. The 2016 Term Loan bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45% or the base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.5% to 1.45% (in each case depending upon Washington REIT’s credit rating). The base rate is the highest of the administrative agent's prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.0%. The 2016 Term Loan currently has an interest rate of one month LIBOR plus 165 basis points, based on Washington REIT's current unsecured debt ratings. We borrowed $100.0 million on the term loan in the fourth quarter of 2016, and borrowed the remaining $50.0 million in the first quarter of 2017. We used the proceeds to refinance maturing secured debt. We also entered into forward interest rate derivatives commencing on March 31, 2017 to effectively fix the interest rate on the 2016 Term Loan at 2.86% (see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements).
Depending upon market conditions, opportunities to issue unsecured notes on attractive terms may not be available. During periods in the recent past, debt capital was essentially unavailable for extended periods of time. While debt markets have improved, it is difficult to predict if the improvement is sustainable.
Our unsecured notes contain covenants with which we must comply, including:
A maximum ratio of 65.0% of total indebtedness to total assets;
A maximum ratio of 40.0% of secured indebtedness to total assets;
A maximum ratio of 1.50 of our income available for debt service payments to required debt service payments; and
A maximum ratio of 1.50 of total unencumbered assets to total unsecured indebtedness.
Failure to comply with any of the covenants under our unsecured notes or other debt instruments could result in a default under one or more of our unsecured note covenants. This could cause our debt holders to accelerate the timing of payments and would therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and liquidity. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with our unsecured note covenants. In addition, our ability to draw on our Revolving Credit Facility, or incur other2023 Term Loan and unsecured debt in the future could be restricted by our unsecured note covenants.notes.
From time to time, we may seek to repurchase and cancel our outstanding unsecured notes through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
Common Equity
We have authorized for issuance 100.0150.0 million common shares, of which approximately 78.587.9 million shares were outstanding at December 31, 2017.2023.
On June 23, 2015,February 17, 2021, we entered into four separate amendments to each of our existing equity distribution agreements (collectively, the “Equity(“Original Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and RBC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Truist Securities, Inc. (f/k/a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.), each dated May 4, 2018 (collectively, as amended, the “Equity Distribution Agreements”) for our at-the-market program. Also on February 17, 2021, we entered into a separate equity distribution agreement with BTIG, LLC relatingon the same terms as the Amended Equity Distribution Agreements (the “BTIG Equity Distribution Agreement”). On September 22, 2021, BTIG, LLC notified us that it was terminating the BTIG Equity Distribution Agreement, effective as of September 27, 2021. Pursuant to the issuance and sale ofEquity Distribution Agreements, we may sell, from time to time, up to $200.0an aggregate price of $550.0 million of our common shares from time to time. Salesof beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share. Issuances of our common shares are made at market prices prevailing at the time of sale.issuance. We intend tomay use net proceeds from the saleissuance of common shares under this program for general corporatebusiness purposes, including, without limitation, working capital, the acquisition, renovation, expansion, improvement, development or redevelopment of income producing propertiesproperty or the repayment of debt. As of December 31, 2017, we had issued 4.5 million
We did not issue common shares under this program at a weighted average share price of $32.31 for net proceeds of $142.8 million.
During the second quarter of 2016, we issued approximately 5.3 million common shares, including 0.7 million shares issued pursuant to the underwriters' over-allotment option, at a price to the public of $28.20 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately $143.4 million.
The Equity Distribution Agreements replace Washington REIT's prior sales agency financing agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, which expired by its terms in June 2015. During 2015, Washington REIT issued 0.2 million common shares at a weighted average price of $28.34, for2023. Our issuances and net proceeds of $5.2 million.on the Equity Distribution Agreements in 2022 and 2021 and the Original Equity Distribution Agreements in 2021, were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Issuance of common shares | — | | | 1,032 | | | 1,636 | |
| Weighted average price per share | $ | — | | | $ | 26.27�� | | | $ | 25.44 | |
| Net proceeds | $ | — | | | 26,849 | | | $ | 40,462 | |
We have a dividend reinvestment program, whereby shareholders may use their dividends and optional cash payments to purchase common shares. The common shares sold under this program may either be common shares issued by us or common shares purchased in the open market. During 2017, we issued approximately 80,000
Our issuances and net proceeds on the dividend reinvestment program for the three years ended December 31, 2023 were as follows (in thousands; except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Issuance of common shares | 28 | | | 47 | | | 75 | |
| Weighted average price per share | $ | 17.64 | | | $ | 22.40 | | | $ | 23.37 | |
| Net proceeds | $ | 497 | | | $ | 1,030 | | | $ | 1,744 | |
On October 26, 2023, the Board authorized and approved a share repurchase program of up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common shares under thisof beneficial interest over a period of two years, subject to any applicable limitations or restrictions set forth in our existing credit facility and other debt agreements. The share repurchase program at a weighted average share price of $32.25 for gross proceeds of $2.6 million.is scheduled to expire on October 25, 2025, unless extended by the Board.
Preferred Equity
Our board of trusteesBoard can, at its discretion, authorize the issuance of up to 10.0 million preferred shares. The ability to issue preferred equity provides Washington REITElme Communities an additional financing tool that may be used to raise capital for future acquisitions or other business purposes. As of December 31, 2017,2023, no preferred shares had been authorized or issued.were issued and outstanding.
Dividends
We currently declare dividends quarterly at a rate of $0.30 per share. The maintenance of our dividend level is subject to various factors reviewed by the board of trustees in its discretion. These factors include our results of operations, the availability of cash and the REIT distribution requirements, which require at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to be distributed to shareholders on an annual basis. When setting the dividend level, our board of trustees looks in particular at trends in our level of funds from operations, together with associated recurring capital improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and incentives, and adjustments to straight-line rents to reflect cash rents received.
Our dividend and distribution payments for the three years ended December 31, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Common dividends | $ | 91,666 |
| | $ | 85,648 |
| | $ | 61,510 |
|
| Noncontrolling interest distributions | 4,199 |
| | 196 |
| | — |
|
| | $ | 95,865 |
| | $ | 85,844 |
| | $ | 61,510 |
|
Dividends paid during 2017 increased from 2016 primarily due to the issuance of approximately 3.6 million common shares during 2017.
Dividends paid during 2016 increased from 2015 primarily due to the payment on January 5, 2016 of the $22.4 million of dividends declared and accrued during the fourth quarter of 2015.
The $4.2 million distribution to noncontrolling interests in 2017 is primarily related to our purchase of the remaining 10% joint venture interest in The Maxwell (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements).
Capital Commitments
We will require capital for development and redevelopment projects currently underway and in the future. We are currentlypreviously engaged in development activities for the ground-up development of a multifamily property (The Trove) on land adjacent to The Wellington, the redevelopment of Spring Valley Village to add rentable space and predevelopment activities for the ground-up development of a multifamilyresidential property on land adjacent to Riverside Apartments.Apartments, but as of the second quarter of 2022, we paused development activities. As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had no outstanding contractual commitments related to our development and redevelopment projects and do not expect to fund approximately $45.0 - $50.0 million of total development/redevelopment spending during 2018.
In addition tospend on our development and redevelopment projects weduring 2024.
We anticipate funding approximately $23.0 - $28.0 million on several major renovation projects inat our portfoliosresidential communities during 2018, as follows (in thousands):2024.
|
| | | |
| Office | $ | 6,100 |
|
| Multifamily | 16,500 |
|
| Retail | 1,900 |
|
| Total | $ | 24,500 |
|
These projects include unit renovations, property technology initiatives, common area and roof replacements at multifamily properties; elevator modernizations, HVAC replacementsmechanical upgrades, facade and restroom upgrades at office properties;retaining wall restorations and roof replacements at retail properties.fire system upgrades. Not all of the anticipated spending had been committed via executed construction contracts at December 31, 2017.2023. We expect to fund these projects using cash generated by our real estate operations, through borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility, or raising additional debt or equity capital in the public market.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2017,2023, certain contractual obligations will require significant capital as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments due by Period |
| | Total | | Less than 1
year | | 1-3 years | | 4-5 years | | After 5
years |
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 806,442 | | | $ | 25,308 | | | $ | 336,918 | | | $ | 80,470 | | | $ | 363,746 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments due by Period |
| | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 4-5 years | | After 5 years |
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 1,345,893 |
| | $ | 76,629 |
| | $ | 676,950 |
| | $ | 526,002 |
| | $ | 66,312 |
|
Purchase obligations(2) | 7,255 |
| | 3,589 |
| | 3,666 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Tenant-related capital(3) | 23,610 |
| | 23,610 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Building capital(4) | 5,706 |
| | 5,706 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Operating leases | 13,865 |
| | 327 |
| | 863 |
| | 520 |
| | 12,155 |
|
| |
(1)
| See notes 4, 5 and 6 of our consolidated financial statements. Amounts include principal, interest and facility fees. |
| |
(2)
| Represents electricity purchase agreements with terms through 2018 and natural gas purchase agreements with terms through 2017. |
| |
(3)
| Committed tenant-related capital based on executed leases as of December 31, 2017. |
| |
(4)
| Committed building capital additions based on contracts in place as of December 31, 2017. |
WeIn addition to our long-term debt, we have committed building capital expenditures of $2.0 million in 2024 based on contracts in place as of December 31, 2023, along with other various standing or renewable contracts with vendors. The majority of these contracts can be canceled with immaterial or no cancellation penalties, with the exception of our elevator maintenance agreements and our electricity and natural gas purchase agreements, which are included above on the purchase obligations line.agreements. Contract terms on leases that can be canceled are generally one year or less. We are currently committed to fund tenant-related capital improvements as described in the table above for executed leases. However, expected leasing levels could require additional tenant-related capital improvements which are not currently committed. We expect that total tenant-related capital improvements, including those already committed, will be approximately $28 million in 2018.
Historical Cash Flows
Cash flows from operations are an important factor in our ability to sustain our dividend at its current rate. If our cash flows from operations were to decline significantly from current levels, we may have to reduce our dividend. Consolidated cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2017 were2023 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Variance |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2023 vs. 2022 | | 2022 vs. 2021 |
| Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 84,669 | | | $ | 73,211 | | | $ | 89,156 | | | $ | 11,458 | | | $ | (15,945) | |
| Cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (146,221) | | | (241,163) | | | 702,170 | | | 94,942 | | | (943,333) | |
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 60,238 | | | (56,416) | | | (565,396) | | | 116,654 | | | 508,980 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | | Variance |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | | 2016 vs. 2015 |
| Cash provided by operating activities | $ | 130,626 |
| | $ | 114,725 |
| | $ | 109,318 |
| | $ | 15,901 |
| | $ | 5,407 |
|
| Cash used in investing activities | (196,354 | ) | | (63,492 | ) | | (89,826 | ) | | (132,862 | ) | | 26,334 |
|
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 60,729 |
| | (70,819 | ) | | (8,410 | ) | | 131,548 |
| | (62,409 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased in 20172023 as compared to 2022 primarily due to incomehigher rental revenue from the acquisitions executedof Elme Druid Hills in 20162023 and 2017Elme Sandy Springs, Elme Marietta and lower interest payments in 2017, partially offset by dispositions in 2016 and 2017.Elme Cumberland during 2022. Net cash provided by operating activities increaseddecreased in 20162022 as compared to 2021 primarily due to income from acquisitions executed in 2015the sales of twelve office properties (the "Office Portfolio") and 2016eight retail properties (the "Retail Portfolio") during 2021 (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements) and lower interest payments in 2016, partially offset by dispositions in 2016.costs associated with our strategic transformation.
Net cash used in investing activities increased in 2017 primarily due to a lower volume of disposition activity in 2017, partially offset(used in) provided by executing a smaller acquisition during 2017. Net cash used in investing activities decreased in 20162023 as compared to 2022 primarily due to the acquisitions of Elme Sandy Springs, Elme Marietta and Elme Cumberland during 2022, partially offset by the acquisition of Elme Druid Hills during 2023. Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities decreased in 2022 as compared to 2021 primarily due to the sales of the Office Portfolio and the Retail Portfolio during 2021. These were partially offset by the acquisitions of Elme Conyers and Elme Eagles Landing during 2021 and acquisitions of Elme Marietta, Elme Cumberland and Elme Sandy Springs during 2022.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities increased in 2023 compared to 2022 primarily due to executing the $125.0 million 2023 Term Loan and net borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility during 2023 and the repayment of mortgage notes during 2022. These were partially offset by the repayment of the $100.0 million 2018 Term Loan during 2023 and proceeds from equity issuances during 2022. Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities decreased in 2022 as compared to 2021 primarily due to a higher volume of disposition activity in 2016, partially offset by executing a larger acquisitiondebt repayments during 2016.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased in 2017 as compared to 2016 primarily due to lower debt repayments2021 and higher net borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility, partially offset by lower proceeds from equity issuances. Net cash used in financing activities increased in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to higher debt repaymentsissuances and lower dividends paid during 2016, partially offset by proceeds from equity issuances.in 2022.
Capital Improvements and Development Costs
Our capital improvement, development and redevelopment costs for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Accretive capital improvements and development costs: | | | | | |
| Acquisition related improvements | $ | 6,379 | | | $ | 5,236 | | | $ | 7,218 | |
| Expansions and major renovations | 22,340 | | | 21,476 | | | 17,096 | |
| Development/redevelopment | — | | | 698 | | | 8,406 | |
| Tenant improvements (including first generation leases) | 17 | | | 1,337 | | | 2,427 | |
Total accretive capital improvements (1) | 28,736 | | | 28,747 | | | 35,147 | |
| Other capital improvements: | 9,482 | | | 8,464 | | | 5,669 | |
| Total | $ | 38,218 | | | $ | 37,211 | | | $ | 40,816 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Accretive capital improvements and development costs: | | | | | |
| Acquisition related | $ | 24,556 |
| | $ | 8,644 |
| | $ | 3,077 |
|
| Expansions and major renovations | 14,629 |
| | 10,869 |
| | 10,722 |
|
| Development/redevelopment | 18,150 |
| | 22,572 |
| | 31,203 |
|
| Tenant improvements (including first generation leases) | 16,926 |
| | 29,657 |
| | 21,208 |
|
Total accretive capital improvements (1) | 74,261 |
| | 71,742 |
| | 66,210 |
|
| Other capital improvements: | 4,404 |
| | 7,924 |
| | 6,500 |
|
| Total | $ | 78,665 |
| | $ | 79,666 |
| | $ | 72,710 |
|
(1) We consider these capital improvements to be accretive to revenue and not necessarily to net income.
Included in the capital improvement and development costs listed above are capitalized interestemployee compensation in the amount of $1.0$2.3 million, $0.7$1.1 million and $0.7$1.6 million for the three years ended December 31, 2017,2023, respectively, and while none for the year ended December 31, 2023, capitalized employee compensationinterest in the amount of $2.5 million, $1.6$0.3 million and $2.0$0.8 million for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2017,2022, respectively.
Accretive Capital Improvements
Acquisition Related Improvements: Acquisition related improvements are capital improvements to properties acquired during the preceding three years which were anticipated at the time we acquired the properties. These types of improvements were made in 20172023 to Watergate 600, Riverside Apartmentsthe Elme Cumberland, Elme Marietta, Elme Sandy Springs, Elme Eagles Landing and The Wellington.Elme Conyers.
Expansions and Major Renovations:Expansion projects increase the rentable area of a property, while major renovation projects are improvements sufficient to increase the income otherwise achievable at a property. Expansions and major renovations during
2017 2023 included facade and unit renovations and rooffire alarm system and flooring replacement at The Wellington; facade restorationRiverside Apartments; unit and hallway renovations at Elme Alexandria; retail space conversion into additional units at The Ashby; unit renovations and common area renovationsSmartRent installations at 3801 Connecticut Avenue;Elme Dulles; roof replacement and unit renovations at The Kenmore; fitness center upgrades and elevator modernization at 1227 25th Street; elevator modernization at 1140 Connecticut Avenue; common area renovations at Park Adams and officeunit and gymfacade renovations at Bethesda Hill Apartments.Elme Manassas.
Development/Redevelopment: Development costs represent expenditures for ground up development of new operating properties. Redevelopment costs represent expenditures for improvements intended to reposition properties in their markets and increasegenerate more income thatthan would be otherwise achievable. Development/redevelopment costs in 2017 primarily include development costs for the Trove, a multifamily development adjacent to The Wellington,2022 and 2021 included predevelopment costs for a future multifamilyresidential development adjacent to Riverside Apartments, and redevelopment costs at the Army Navy Building and Spring Valley Village. The Army Navy Building redevelopment was placed into service during 2017.which is currently on hold.
Tenant Improvements: Tenant improvements are costs, such as space build-out, associated with commercial lease transactions. Our average tenant improvement costs per square foot of space leased, excluding first generation leases, during the three years ended December 31, 2017 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Office | $ | 62.28 |
| | $ | 28.96 |
| | $ | 30.37 |
|
| Retail | $ | 8.69 |
| | $ | 5.53 |
| | $ | 15.36 |
|
The $33.32 increase in 2017 in tenant improvement costs per square foot of office space leased was primarily due new tenant leases executed at Braddock Metro Center and Army Navy Building, as well as due to a large lease renewal at 1775 Eye Street. The $1.41 decrease in 2016 in tenant improvement costs per square foot of office space leased were primarily due to leases executed in 2015 at Silverline Center.
The $3.16 increase in 2017 tenant improvements costs per square foot of retail space leased was primarily due to new leases executed at Gateway Overlook. The $9.83 decrease in 2016 tenant improvement costs per square foot of retail space leased was primarily due to large tenant leases executed at Chevy Chase Metro and Bradlee Shopping Center in 2015.
Tenant improvement costs for retail tenants are substantially lower than for office tenants because the improvements required for retail tenants tend to be substantially less extensive than for office tenants.
Other Capital Improvements
Other capital improvements, also referred to as recurring capital improvements, are those not included in the above categories. Over time these costs will be recurring in nature to maintain a property's income and value. In our multifamily properties, these include new appliances, flooring, cabinets and bathroom fixtures. TheseThis category includes improvements which are made as needed upon vacancy of an apartment,apartment. Such improvements totaled $1.7$8.3 million in 2017,2023, averaging approximately $900$2,200 per apartmentunit for the 41%42% of apartmentsunits which turned over relative to our total portfolio of apartment units. In our commercial properties and multifamily properties (asidehomes. Aside from improvements related to apartment turnover),turnover, these improvements include facade repairs, installation of new heating and air conditioning equipment, asphalt replacement, permanent landscaping, new lighting and new finishes. In addition, we incurred repair and maintenance expense of $5.6$4.0 million during 20172023 to maintain the quality of our buildings.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 20172023 that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include eachSome of the statements in “Item 1: Business” and “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” concerning the Washington metro region’s economy, gross regional product, unemployment and job growth and real estate market performance. Such forward-looking statements also include the following statements with respect to Washington REIT:
(a) our intention to invest in properties that we believe will increase in income and value;
(b) our belief that external sources of capital will continue to be available and that additional sources of capital will be available from the sale of common shares or notes;
(c) our belief that we have the liquidity and capital resources necessary to meet our known obligations and to make additional property acquisitions and capital improvements when appropriate to enhance long-term growth; and
(d) our plans to complete any contemplated acquisitions or dispositions.
Forward-looking statements also include other statements in this report preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “project,” “will” and other similar expressions.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for the foregoing statements. The following important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K could affect ourconstitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Elme Communities to be materially different from future results, and couldperformance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Additional factors which may cause thosethe actual results, performance or achievements of Elme Communities to differbe materially different from thosefuture results, performance or achievements expressed in theor implied by such forward-looking statements:statements include, but are not limited to:
(a) the effect of credit and financial market conditions;
(b) the availability and cost of capital;
(c) fluctuations in interest rates;
(d) the economic health of our tenants;
(e) the timing and pricing of lease transactions;
(f) the economic health of the greater Washington Metro region, or other markets we may enter;
(g) the risks associated with ownership of real estate in general and our real estate assets in particular;
(h) (b)the effectseconomic health of the areas in which our properties are located, particularly with respect to the greater Washington, DC metro and Sunbelt regions;
(c)risks associated with our ability to execute on our strategies, including new strategies with respect to our operations and our portfolio, including the acquisition of apartment homes in the Sunbelt markets and our ability to realize any anticipated operational benefits from our internalization of community management functions;
(d)the risk of failure to enter into and/or complete acquisitions and dispositions;
(e)changes in the composition of our portfolio;
(f)reductions in or actual or threatened changes to the timing of federal government spending;
(i) (g)the supplyeconomic health of competing properties;our residents;
(h)the impact from macroeconomic factors (including inflation, increases in interest rates, potential economic slowdowns or recessions and geopolitical conflicts);
(i)risks related to our ability to control our expenses if revenues decrease;
(j)compliance with applicable laws and corporate social responsibility goals, including those concerning the environment and access by persons with disabilities;
(k) governmental or regulatory actions and initiatives;risks related to not having adequate insurance to cover potential losses;
(l)changes in the market value of securities;
(m)terrorist attacks or actions;actions and/or cyber-attacks;
(m) weather conditions(n)whether we will succeed in the day-to-day property management and natural disasters;leasing activities that we have previously outsourced;
(n) (o)the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of securities markets;
(p)the risks related to our organizational structure and limitations of share ownership;
(q)failure to qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT;REIT and the risks of changes in laws affecting REITs; and
(o) the availability of and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
(p) uncertainty in our ability to continue to pay dividends at the current rates; and
(q) (r)other factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors.”
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see the section entitled “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements or risk factors to reflect new information, future events, or otherwise.
Funds From Operations
NAREIT FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for real estate companies. We provideIn its 2018 NAREIT FFO as a supplemental measure to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. Although NAREIT FFO is a widely used measure of operating performance for REITs, NAREIT FFO does not represent net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. As such, it should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance. In addition, NAREIT FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity. In its April, 2002 White Paper Restatement, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) defines NAREIT FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains (or losses) associated with sales of properties; impairments of depreciable real estate, and real estate depreciation and amortization. We consider NAREIT FFO to be a standard supplemental measure for REITs, and believe it is a useful metric because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of our properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which historically assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have instead historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that NAREIT FFO more accurately provides investors an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, make capital expenditures and fund other needs. Our NAREIT FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs. These other REITs may not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently.
The following table provides the calculation of our NAREIT FFO and a reconciliation of NAREIT FFO to net income for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | 16,384 | |
| Adjustments: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 88,950 | | | 91,722 | | | 72,656 | |
| Real estate impairment | 41,860 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Discontinued operations: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | — | | | — | | | 22,904 | |
| Gain on sale of depreciable real estate, net | — | | | — | | | (46,441) | |
| NAREIT FFO | $ | 77,833 | | | $ | 60,854 | | | $ | 65,503 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
|
| Adjustments: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 112,056 |
| | 108,406 |
| | 108,935 |
|
| Impairment of depreciable real estate | 33,152 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Gain on sale of depreciable real estate | (23,838 | ) | | (101,704 | ) | | (89,653 | ) |
| NAREIT FFO | $ | 140,982 |
| | $ | 125,990 |
| | $ | 108,469 |
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We base the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We evaluate these estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to estimated useful lives of real estate assets, estimated fair value of acquired leases, cost reimbursement income, bad debts, contingencies and litigation. We base the estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We cannot assure you that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
We believe the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Accounting for Real EstateAsset Acquisitions
We recordallocate the purchase price, including transaction costs, of acquired or assumed assets, including physical assets and in-place leases, and assumed liabilities, based on their fair values. We determine the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities in accordance with current GAAP fair value provisions. We determine the fair values of acquired buildings on an “as-if-vacant” basis considering a variety of factors, including the replacement cost of the property, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. We determine the fair value of land
acquired based on comparisons to similar properties that have been recently marketed for sale or sold.
The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components: (a) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including
foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant and foregone recovery of tenant pass-throughs (referred to as “absorption cost”); (b) the estimated cost of tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “tenant origination cost”); (c) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “leasing commissions”); (d) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place, including consideration of renewal options, to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as “net lease intangible”); and (e) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determinedis based onupon our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s leasethe leases. Factors considered in the fair value analysis include the estimated cost to replace the leases, including foregone rents and our overall relationship with the tenantexpense reimbursements during hypothetical expected lease-up periods (referred to as “customer relationship value”“absorption cost”).
We discount the amounts used, consideration of current market conditions and costs to calculate net lease intangibles using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. We include tenant origination costs in income producing property on our balance sheet and amortize the tenant origination costs as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset, which is typically the remaining life of the underlyingexecute similar leases. We classify leasing commissions and absorption costs as other assets and amortize leasing commissions and absorption costs as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We classify above market net lease intangible assets as other assets and amortize them on a straight-line basis as a decrease to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. We classify below market net lease intangible liabilities as other liabilities and amortize them on a straight-line basis as an increase to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. If any of the fair value of below market lease intangibles includes fair value associated with a renewal option, such amounts are not amortized until the renewal option is executed, else the related value is expensed at that time. Should a tenant terminate its lease, we accelerate the amortization of the unamortized portion of the tenant origination cost (if it has no future value), leasing commissions, absorption costs and net lease intangible associated with that lease over its new shorter term.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize rental income and rental abatements from our multifamily and commercial leases when earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We record a provision for losses on accounts receivable equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. We base this estimate on our historical experience and a monthly review of the current status of our receivables. We consider factors such as the age of the receivable, the payment history of our tenants and our assessment of our tenants’ ability to perform under their lease obligations, among other things. In addition to rents due currently, accounts receivable include amounts representing minimum rental income accrued on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases. Our estimate of uncollectible accounts is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the impact of economic and market conditions on tenants.
Capitalized Interest
We capitalize interest costs incurred on borrowing obligations while qualifying assets are being readied for their intended use. We amortize capitalized interest over the useful life of the related underlying assets upon those assets being placed into service.
Real Estate Impairment
We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, development assets or land held for future development, if indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount and estimatedamount. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows associated withare based on forward-looking assumptions, including annual and residual cash flows and our estimated holding period for each property. Such assumptions involve a high degree of judgment and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. When determining if a property has indicators of impairment, we evaluate the property's occupancy, our expected holding period for the property, strategic decisions regarding the property's future operations or development expenditures.and other market factors. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to theits estimated fair value.value, calculated in accordance with current GAAP fair value provisions. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell.
Stock Based Compensation
We recognize compensation expense for service-based share awards ratably over the period from the service inception date through the vesting period based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. We initially measure compensation expense for awards with performance conditions at fair value at the service inception date based on probability of payout, and we remeasure compensation expense at subsequent reporting dates until all of the award’s key terms and conditions are known and the grant date is established. We amortize awards with performance conditions using the graded expense method. We measure compensation expense for awards with market conditions based on the grant date fair value, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, and we amortize the expense ratably over the requisite service period, regardless of whether the market conditions are achieved and the awards ultimately vest. Compensation expense for the trustee grants, which fully vest immediately, is fully recognized upon issuance based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.
Federal Income Taxes
Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Our TRSs are subject to corporate federal and state income tax on their taxable income at regular statutory rates, or as calculated under the alternative minimum tax, as appropriate. During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized an income tax benefit of $0.7 million from a reduction of the valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset at one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2017, our TRSs deferred tax asset of $1.4 million was fully reserved and there was no deferred tax liability. As of December 31, 2016, our TRSs had a deferred tax asset of $0.5 million, net of a valuation allowance of $2.9 million. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, our TRSs had deferred tax liabilities of $0.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Watergate 600, we recorded a deferred state and local tax liability of approximately $0.6 million. These deferred tax liabilities are primarily related to temporary differences in the timing of the recognition of revenue, amortization and depreciation.
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The principal material financial market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to refinancing long-term fixed rate obligations, the opportunity cost of fixed rate obligations in a falling interest rate environment and our variable rate line of credit. We primarily enter into debt obligations to support general corporate purposes, including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs. We use interest rate swap arrangements to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in interest rates.
The table below presents principal, interest and related weighted average fair value interest rates by year of maturity, with respect to debt outstanding on December 31, 2017.2023 (dollars in thousands).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | 2028 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value |
| Unsecured fixed rate debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | — | | | $ | 125,000 | | (1) | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,000 | | | $ | 350,000 | | | $ | 525,000 | | | $ | 466,668 | |
| Interest payments | $ | 23,908 | | | $ | 17,995 | | | $ | 17,995 | | | $ | 17,995 | | | $ | 16,155 | | | $ | 28,061 | | | $ | 122,109 | | | |
| Interest rate on debt maturities | — | % | | 5.6 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 7.4 | % | | 4.1 | % | | 4.9 | % | | |
| Unsecured variable rate debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | — | | | $ | 157,000 | | | $ | — | | | — | | | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 157,000 | | | $ | 157,000 | |
| Variable interest rate on debt maturities | | | 6.3 | % | | | | | | | | | | 6.3 | % | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value |
| (In thousands) | | | | | | | |
Unsecured fixed rate debt (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250,000 |
| | $ | 150,000 |
| | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | 200,000 |
| | $ | 900,000 |
| | $ | 931,377 |
|
| Interest payments | $ | 36,224 |
| | $ | 36,224 |
| | $ | 36,224 |
| | $ | 20,786 |
| | $ | 19,765 |
| | $ | 22,439 |
| | $ | 171,662 |
| | |
| Interest rate on debt maturities | — | % | | — | % | | 5.1 | % | | 2.7 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 4.1 | % | | |
| Unsecured variable rate debt | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal | $ | — |
| | $ | 166,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 166,000 |
| | $ | 166,000 |
|
| Variable interest rate on debt maturities | — | % | | 2.5 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 2.5 | % | | |
| Mortgages | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal amortization (2) (30 year schedule) | $ | 34,544 |
| (3) | $ | 2,500 |
| | $ | 2,659 |
| | $ | 2,829 |
| | $ | 46,984 |
| | $ | 2,398 |
| | $ | 91,914 |
| | $ | 97,181 |
|
| Interest payments | $ | 4,661 |
| | $ | 3,206 |
| | $ | 3,046 |
| | $ | 2,876 |
| | $ | 649 |
| | $ | 78 |
| | $ | 14,516 |
| | |
| Weighted average interest rate on principal amortization | 5.3 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 4.7 | % | | 3.8 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 4.5 | % | | |
(1) Includes $150.0 million term loan and $100.0Represents a $125.0 million term loan with a floating interest rates.rate. A $100.0 million portion of the term loan was previously effectively fixed by an interest rate swap that expired on July 21, 2023. The $150.0 millionfull amount of the term loan is effectively fixed by interest rate swap arrangements at 2.7%, and the $100.0 million term loan is effectively fixed by forward interest rate swap arrangements at 2.9%.
(2) Excludes net discounts of $3.4 million and net unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2017.
(3) The maturity date of the mortgage note secured by Kenmore Apartments is March 1, 2019, but can be prepaid, without penalty, beginning on September 1, 2018. We currently intend to prepay this mortgage note in 2018.
On September 15, 2015, we entered into two interest rate swap arrangements with a total notional amount of $150.0 million to swap the floating interest rate under our new $150.0 million term loan to an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.7% starting on October 15, 2015 and extending until the maturity of the term loan on March 15, 2021. On July 22, 2016, we entered into two forward interest rate swap arrangements with a total notional amount of $150.0 million to swap the floating interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan (see note 6) to an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.9%, starting on March 31, 2017 and extending until the maturity of the 2016 Term Loanswaps that became effective on July 21, 2023 (see note 7 toand expire on the consolidated financial statements).loan’s maturity date of January 10, 2025.
We entered into the interest rate swap arrangements designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to reduce our exposure to the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparty under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreement. We believe that we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions. As part of our ongoing control procedures, we monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, thus minimizing our credit risk concentration.
The following table sets forth information pertaining to interest rate swap contractscontract in place as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 and theirits respective fair valuesvalue (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Notional Amount | | | | Floating Index Rate | | | | Termination/ | | Fair Value as of: |
| Fixed Rate | | | Effective Date | | Expiration Date | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| $ | 100,000 | | | 1.205% | | USD-SOFR | | 3/31/2017 | | 7/21/2023 | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,998 | |
| 75,000 | | | 3.677% | | USD-SOFR | | 7/21/2023 | | 1/10/2025 | | 740 | | | — | |
| 50,000 | | | 3.676% | | USD-SOFR | | 7/21/2023 | | 1/10/2025 | | 494 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,234 | | | $ | 1,998 | |
We enter into debt obligations primarily to support general corporate purposes including acquisition of real estate properties, capital improvements and working capital needs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Notional Amount | | | | Floating Index Rate | | | | | | Fair Value as of: |
| | Fixed Rate | | | Effective Date | | Expiration Date | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| $ | 75,000 |
| | 1.619% | | One-Month LIBOR | | 10/15/2015 | | 3/15/2021 | | $ | 1,006 |
| | $ | 224 |
|
| 75,000 |
| | 1.626% | | One-Month LIBOR | | 10/15/2015 | | 3/15/2021 | | 981 |
| | 193 |
|
| 100,000 |
| | 1.205% | | One-Month LIBOR | | 3/31/2017 | | 7/21/2023 | | 4,943 |
| | 4,775 |
|
| 50,000 |
| | 1.208% | | One-Month LIBOR | | 3/31/2017 | | 7/21/2023 | | 2,489 |
| | 2,419 |
|
| $ | 300,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 9,419 |
| | $ | 7,611 |
|
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
| |
The financial statements and supplementary data appearing on pages 6083 to 95118 are incorporated herein by reference. |
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief AccountingAdministrative Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
During the third quarter of 2017, we implemented upgrades to our accounting information systems. The implementation of our upgraded systems was not made in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. The implementation was subject to various testing and review procedures prior to and after execution. We have updated our internal controls over financial reporting, as necessary, to accommodate any modifications to our business processes or accounting procedures due to the implementation. Management does not believe that the implementation of the upgraded systems has had an adverse effect on our internal controls over financial reporting and will continue to monitor, test and evaluate the systems during the post-implementation period to ensure that adequate controls over financial reporting continue to be maintained.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief AccountingAdministrative Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2023. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief AccountingAdministrative Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
See the Report of Management in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
See the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
During the three months ended December 31, 2017,2023, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
None.During the three months ended December 31, 2023, no trustee or officer of Elme Communities adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to our qualification and taxation as a real estate investment trust, a “REIT,” and the acquisition, holding, and disposition of (i) our common shares, preferred shares and depositary shares (together with common shares and preferred shares, the “shares”) as well as our warrants and rights, and (ii) certain debt securities that we may offer (together with the shares, the “securities”). For purposes of this discussion, references to “our Company,” “we” and “us” mean only Elme Communities and not its subsidiaries or affiliates. This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), the Treasury Regulations, rulings and other administrative interpretations and practices of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) (including administrative interpretations and practices expressed in private letter rulings, which are binding on the IRS only with respect to the particular taxpayers who requested and received those rulings), and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect, and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. We have not sought and will not seek an advance ruling from the IRS regarding any matter discussed in this section. The summary is also based upon the assumption that we will operate the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliated entities in accordance with their applicable organizational documents. This summary is for general information only, and does not purport to discuss all aspects
of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to a particular investor in light of its investment or tax circumstances, or to investors subject to special tax rules, including:
•tax-exempt organizations, except to the extent discussed below in “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders” and “Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities-Tax-Exempt Holders of Debt Securities,”
•broker-dealers,
•non-U.S. corporations, non-U.S. partnerships, non-U.S. trusts, non-U.S. estates, or individuals who are not taxed as citizens or residents of the United States, all of which may be referred to collectively as “non-U.S. persons,” except to the extent discussed below in “—Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders” and “—Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities,”
•trusts and estates,
•regulated investment companies (“RICs”),
•REITs, financial institutions,
•insurance companies,
•subchapter S corporations,
•foreign (non-U.S.) governments,
•persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code,
•persons holding the shares as part of a “hedge,” “straddle,” “conversion,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment,
•persons holding the shares through a partnership or similar pass-through entity,
•persons with a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar,
•persons holding 10% or more (by vote or value) of the beneficial interest in us, except to the extent discussed below,
•persons who do not hold the shares as a “capital asset,” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code,
•corporations subject to the provisions of Section 7874 of the Code,
•U.S. expatriates,
•persons required for U.S. federal income tax purposes to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement, or
•persons otherwise subject to special tax treatment under the Code.
This summary does not address state, local or non-U.S. tax considerations. This summary also does not consider tax considerations that may be relevant with respect to securities we may issue, or selling security holders may sell, other than our shares and certain debt instruments described below. Each time we or selling security holders sell securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that sale and may add to, modify or update the discussion below, as appropriate.
Each prospective investor is advised to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the impact of his or her personal tax situation on the anticipated tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and sale of our shares, warrants, rights and/or debt securities. This includes the U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax considerations of the ownership and sale of our shares, warrants, rights and/or debt securities, and the potential changes in applicable tax laws.
Taxation of the Company as a REIT
We elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with our first taxable year ended December 31, 1960. A REIT generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on the “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income of the REIT subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain) that it distributes to shareholders, provided that the REIT meets the annual REIT distribution requirement and the other requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code. We believe that we are organized and have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner so as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code. However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under the Code, including (through our actual annual (or in some cases quarterly) operating results) requirements relating to income, asset ownership, distribution levels and diversity of share ownership. Given the complex nature of the REIT qualification requirements, the ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be organized or operated in a manner so as to satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code, or that we will meet such requirements in the future. See “—Failure to Qualify as a REIT.”
The sections of the Code that relate to our qualification and taxation as a REIT are highly technical and complex. This discussion sets forth the material aspects of the Code sections that govern the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, relevant rules and Treasury Regulations, and related administrative and judicial interpretations.
Taxation of REITs in General
For each taxable year in which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid and excluding our net capital gain) that is distributed annually to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double taxation” at the corporate and shareholder levels that generally results from an investment in a non-REIT C corporation. A non-REIT C corporation is a corporation that generally is required to pay tax at the corporate level. Double taxation means taxation once at the corporate level when income is earned and once again at the shareholder level when the income is distributed. In general, the income that we generate is taxed only at the shareholder level upon a distribution of dividends to our shareholders.
U.S. shareholders generally will be subject to taxation on dividends distributed by us (other than designated capital gain dividends and “qualified dividend income”) at rates applicable to ordinary income, instead of at lower capital gain rates. For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026, generally, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations. Capital gain dividends and qualified dividend income will continue to be subject to a maximum 20% rate (excluding the 3.8% tax on “net investment income”).
Any net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to our shareholders, subject to special rules for certain items such as the net capital gain that we recognize.
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the following circumstances:
1.We will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed “REIT taxable income,” including any undistributed net capital gain. REIT taxable income is the taxable income of the REIT subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid.
2.If we have (1) net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, or (2) other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, such income will be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate.
3.Our net income from “prohibited transactions” will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property.
4.If we fail to satisfy either the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test, as discussed below, but our failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and we nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because we satisfy specified cure provisions, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (a) the greater of (1) the amount by which we fail the 75% gross income test or (2) the amount by which we fail the 95% gross income test, as the case may be, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
5.We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required calendar year distribution over the sum of the amounts actually distributed, excess distributions from the preceding tax year and amounts retained for which U.S. federal income tax was paid. The required distribution for each calendar year is equal to the sum of:
•85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year;
•95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year, other than capital gains we elect to retain and pay tax on as described below; and
•any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years.
6.We will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain rental income we receive when a taxable REIT subsidiary provides services to our tenants, on certain expenses deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary on payments made to us and on income for services rendered to us by a taxable REIT subsidiary, if the arrangements among us, our tenants, and our taxable REIT subsidiary do not reflect arm’s-length terms.
7.If we acquire any assets from a non-REIT C corporation in a carry-over basis transaction, we would be liable for corporate income tax, at the highest applicable corporate rate, on the “built-in gain” inherent in those assets if we disposed of those assets within five years after they were acquired. To the extent that assets are transferred to us in a carry-over basis transaction by a partnership in which a non-REIT C corporation owns an interest, we will be subject to this tax in proportion to the non-REIT C corporation’s interest in the partnership. Built-in gain is the amount by which an asset’s fair market value exceeds its adjusted tax basis at the time we acquire the asset. The results described in this paragraph assume that the non-REIT C corporation or partnership transferor will not elect, in lieu of this treatment, to be subject to an immediate tax when the asset is acquired by us.
8.We may elect to retain and pay U.S. federal income tax on our net long-term capital gain. In that case, a U.S. shareholder would include its proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain (to the extent that we make a timely designation of such gain to the shareholder) in its income, would be deemed to have paid the tax we paid on such gain, and would be allowed a credit for its proportionate share of the tax deemed to have been paid, and an adjustment would be made to increase the basis of the U.S. shareholder in our common shares.
9.If we violate an asset test (other than certain de minimis violations) or other requirements applicable to REITs, as described below, but our failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and we nevertheless maintain our REIT qualification because we satisfy specified cure provisions, we will be subject to a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the amount determined by multiplying the net income generated by such non-qualifying assets by the highest rate of tax applicable to non-REIT C corporations during periods when owning such assets would have caused us to fail the relevant asset test.
10.If we fail to satisfy a requirement under the Code and the failure would result in the loss of our REIT qualification, other than a failure to satisfy a gross income test or an asset test, as described above, but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because the requirements of certain relief provisions are satisfied, we will be subject to a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure.
11.If we fail to comply with the requirement to send annual letters to our shareholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our shares and the failure was not due to reasonable cause or was due to willful neglect, we will be subject to a $25,000 penalty or, if the failure is intentional, a $50,000 penalty.
12.The earnings of any subsidiaries that are non-REIT C corporations, including any taxable REIT subsidiaries, are subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax.
Notwithstanding our qualification as a REIT, we and our subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes, including payroll taxes and state, local, and foreign income, property and other taxes on our assets, operations and/or net worth. We could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.
Requirements for Qualification as a REIT
The Code defines a “REIT” as a corporation, trust or association:
(1)that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
(2)that issues transferable shares or transferable certificates to evidence its beneficial ownership;
(3)that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for Sections 856 through 859 of the Code;
(4)that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code;
(5)that is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons;
(6)not more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares or other beneficial interest of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities and as determined by applying certain attribution rules) during the last half of each taxable year;
(7)that makes an election to be a REIT for the current taxable year, or has made such an election for a previous taxable year that has not been revoked or terminated, and that satisfies all relevant filing and other administrative requirements established by the IRS that must be met to elect and maintain REIT status;
(8)that uses a calendar year for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
(9)that meets other applicable tests, described below, regarding the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions; and
(10)that has no earnings and profits from any non-REIT taxable year at the close of any taxable year.
The Code provides that conditions (1), (2), (3) and (4) above must be met during the entire taxable year and condition (5) above must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Conditions (5) and (6) do not apply until after the first taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as a REIT. Condition (6) must be met during the last half of each taxable year. For purposes of determining share ownership under condition (6) above, a supplemental unemployment compensation benefits plan, a private foundation or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes generally is considered an individual. However, a trust that is a qualified trust under Code Section 401(a) generally is not considered an individual, and beneficiaries of a qualified trust are treated as holding shares of a REIT in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust for purposes of condition (6) above.
We believe that we have been organized, have operated and have issued sufficient shares of beneficial interest with sufficient diversity of ownership to allow us to satisfy the above conditions. In addition, our declaration of trust contains restrictions regarding the transfer of shares of beneficial interest that are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. If we fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, we will fail to qualify as a REIT unless we qualify for certain relief provisions described below under “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT-Relief from Violations; Reasonable Cause.”
To monitor our compliance with condition (6) above, we are generally required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of our shares. To do so, we must demand written statements each year from the record holders of specified percentages of our shares pursuant to which the record holders must disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by us). We must maintain a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand as part of our records. We could be subject to monetary penalties if we fail to comply with these record-keeping requirements. A shareholder that fails or refuses to comply with the demand is required by Treasury Regulations to submit a statement with its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of our shares and other information. If we comply with the record-keeping requirement and we do not know or, exercising reasonable diligence, would not have known of our failure to meet condition (6) above, then we will be treated as having met condition (6) above.
To qualify as a REIT, we cannot have at the end of any taxable year any undistributed earnings and profits that are attributable to a non-REIT taxable year. We elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with our first taxable year in 1960 and we have not succeeded to any earnings and profits of a regular corporation. Therefore, we do not believe we have had any undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits.
Relief from Violations; Reasonable Cause
The Code provides relief from violations of the REIT gross income requirements, as described below under “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests,” in cases where a violation is due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, and other requirements are met, including the payment of a penalty tax that is based upon the magnitude of the violation. In addition, certain provisions of the Code extend similar relief in the case of certain violations of the REIT asset
requirements (see “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Asset Tests” below) and other REIT requirements, again provided that the violation is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and other conditions are met, including the payment of a penalty tax. If we did not have reasonable cause for a failure, we would fail to qualify as a REIT. Whether we would have reasonable cause for any such failure cannot be known with certainty, because the determination of whether reasonable cause exists depends on the facts and circumstances at the time and we cannot provide any assurance that we in fact would have reasonable cause for a particular failure or that the IRS would not successfully challenge our view that a failure was due to reasonable cause. Moreover, we may be unable to actually rectify a failure and restore asset test compliance within the required timeframe due to the inability to transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, including as a result of restrictions on transfer imposed by our lenders or undertakings with our co-investors and/or the inability to acquire additional qualifying assets due to transaction risks, access to additional capital or other considerations. If we fail to satisfy any of the various REIT requirements, there can be no assurance that these relief provisions would be available to enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, and, if such relief provisions are available, the amount of any resultant penalty tax could be substantial.
Effect of Subsidiary Entities
Ownership of Partnership Interests. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in an entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Treasury Regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnership’s assets, and to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s income, for purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs, as described below. A REIT’s proportionate share of a partnership’s assets and income is based on the REIT’s pro rata share of the capital interests in the partnership. The Company’s capital interest in a partnership is calculated based on either the Company’s percentage ownership of the capital of the partnership or based on the allocations provided in the applicable partnership or limited liability company operating agreement, using the more conservative calculation. However, solely for purposes of the 10% value test, described below, the determination of a REIT’s interest in the partnership’s assets is based on the REIT’s proportionate interest in the equity and certain debt securities issued by the partnership. In addition, the assets and gross income of the partnership are deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of any of our subsidiary partnerships, which include the assets, liabilities, and items of income of any partnership in which our subsidiary partnership holds an interest, are treated as our assets and items of income for purposes of applying the REIT requirements.
Any investment in partnerships involves special tax considerations, including the possibility of a challenge by the IRS of the status of any subsidiary partnership as a partnership, as opposed to an association taxable as a corporation, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If any of these entities were treated as an association for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation and therefore could be subject to an entity-level tax on its income. In such a situation, the character of our assets and items of gross income would change and could preclude us from satisfying the REIT asset tests or the gross income tests as discussed in “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Asset Tests” and “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests,” and in turn could prevent us from qualifying as a REIT, unless we are eligible for relief from the violation pursuant to relief provisions. See “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Relief from Violations; Reasonable Cause” above, and “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests,” “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Asset Tests” and “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT— Failure to Qualify as a REIT,” below, for discussion of the effect of failure to satisfy the REIT tests for a taxable year, and of the relief provisions. In addition, any change in the status of any subsidiary partnership for tax purposes might be treated as a taxable event, in which case we could have taxable income that is subject to the REIT distribution requirements without receiving any cash.
Under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, liability is imposed on the partnership (rather than its partners) for adjustments to reported partnership taxable income resulting from audits or other tax proceedings. The liability can include an imputed underpayment of tax, calculated by using the highest marginal U.S. federal income tax rate, as well as interest and penalties on such imputed underpayment of tax. Using certain rules, partnerships may be able to transfer these liabilities to their partners. In
the event any adjustments are imposed by the IRS on the taxable income reported by any subsidiary partnerships, we intend to utilize certain rules to the extent possible to allow us to transfer any liability with respect to such adjustments to the partners of the subsidiary partnerships who should properly bear such liability. However, there is no assurance that we will qualify under those rules or that we will have the authority to use those rules under the operating agreements for certain of our subsidiary partnerships.
We may from time to time be a limited partner or non-managing member in some of our partnerships and limited liability companies. If a partnership or limited liability company in which we own an interest takes or expects to take actions that could jeopardize our status as a REIT or requires us to pay tax, we may be forced to dispose of our interest in such entity. In addition, it is possible that a partnership or limited liability company could take an action which could cause us to fail a gross income or asset test, and that we would not become aware of such action in time to dispose of our interest in the partnership or limited liability company or take other corrective action on a timely basis. In that case, we could fail to qualify as a REIT unless we
were entitled to relief, as described below.
Ownership of Disregarded Subsidiaries. If a REIT owns a corporate subsidiary that is a “qualified REIT subsidiary,” or QRS, that subsidiary is generally disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT itself, including for purposes of the gross income and asset tests applicable to REITs, as described below. A QRS is any corporation, other than a taxable REIT subsidiary, that is directly or indirectly wholly owned by a REIT. Other entities that are wholly owned by us, including single member limited liability companies that have not elected to be taxed as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes, are also generally disregarded as separate entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests. Disregarded subsidiaries, along with any partnerships in which we hold an equity interest, are sometimes referred to herein as “pass-through subsidiaries.”
In the event that a disregarded subsidiary ceases to be wholly owned by us (for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than us or another disregarded subsidiary of ours) the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, the subsidiary would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect our ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the securities of another corporation unless it is a taxable REIT subsidiary or a QRS. See “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests” and “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Asset Tests.”
Ownership of Interests in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. Our taxable REIT subsidiary (and any taxable REIT subsidiary we may form in the future) is a corporation other than a REIT in which we directly or indirectly hold stock, and that has made a joint election with us to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary under Section 856(l) of the Code. A taxable REIT subsidiary also includes any corporation other than a REIT in which a taxable REIT subsidiary of ours owns, directly or indirectly, securities (other than certain “straight debt” securities), which represent more than 35% of the total voting power or value of the outstanding securities of such corporation. Other than some activities relating to lodging and health care facilities, a taxable REIT subsidiary may generally engage in any business, including the provision of customary or non-customary services to our tenants without causing us to receive impermissible tenant service income under the REIT gross income tests. A taxable REIT subsidiary is required to pay regular U.S. federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable, as a regular corporation. In addition, a taxable REIT subsidiary may be prevented from deducting interest on debt, including debt funded directly or indirectly by us, if certain tests are not satisfied. If dividends are paid to us by our taxable REIT subsidiary, then a portion of the dividends we distribute to shareholders who are taxed at individual rates will generally be eligible for taxation at lower capital gains rates, rather than at ordinary income rates. See “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders-Qualified Dividend Income.”
Generally, a taxable REIT subsidiary can perform impermissible tenant services without causing us to receive impermissible tenant services income under the REIT income tests. However, several provisions applicable to the arrangements between us and our taxable REIT subsidiary ensure that such taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of U.S. federal income taxation. For example, taxable REIT subsidiaries are limited in their ability to deduct interest payments in excess of a certain amount, including interest payments made directly or indirectly to us, as described below in “—Annual Distribution Requirements.” In addition, we will be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments we receive or on certain expenses deducted by our taxable REIT subsidiary, and on income earned by our taxable REIT subsidiary for services provided to, or on behalf of, us, if the economic arrangements between us, our tenants and such taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties. Our taxable REIT subsidiary, and any future taxable REIT subsidiaries acquired by us, may make interest and other payments to us and to third parties in connection with activities related to our properties. There can be no assurance that our taxable REIT subsidiary will not be limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made to us. In addition, there can be no assurance that the IRS might not seek to impose the 100% excise tax on a portion of payments received by us from, or expenses deducted by, or service income imputed to, our taxable REIT subsidiary.
We currently own one subsidiary that has elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our taxable REIT subsidiary is taxable as a regular corporation and has elected, together with us, to be treated as our taxable REIT subsidiary. We may elect, together with other corporations in which we may own directly or indirectly stock, for those corporations to be treated as our taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Gross Income Tests
To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests that are applied on an annual basis. First, in each taxable year, at least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, certain hedging transactions, as described below, and certain foreign currency transactions) must be derived from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, generally including:
•“rents from real property”;
•dividends or other distributions on, and gain from the sale of, shares in other REITs;
•gain from the sale of real property or mortgages on real property, in either case, not held for sale to customers;
•interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property; and
•income attributable to temporary investments of new capital in stocks and debt instruments during the one-year period following our receipt of new capital that we raise through equity offerings or issuance of debt obligations with at least a five-year term.
Second, at least 95% of our gross income in each taxable year (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, certain hedging transactions, as described below, and certain foreign currency transactions) must be derived from some combination of income that qualifies under the 75% gross income test described above, as well as other income sources generally including (a) other dividends, (b) interest (including interest income from debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs), and (c) gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities (including gain from the sale or other disposition of debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs), in either case, not held for sale to customers.
Gross income from certain hedging transactions is excluded from gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income requirement. Similarly, gross income from certain hedging transactions is excluded from gross income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Income from, and gain from the termination of, certain hedging transactions, where the property or indebtedness that was the subject of the prior hedging transaction was extinguished or disposed of, also will be excluded from gross income for purposes of either the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test. See “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Gross Income Tests—Income from Hedging Transactions.”
Rents from Real Property. Rents we receive will qualify as “rents from real property” for the purpose of satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if several conditions are met. These conditions relate to the identity of the tenant, the computation of the rent payable, and the nature of the property lease.
•First, the amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount we receive or accrue generally will not be excluded from the term “rents from real property” solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales;
•Second, we, or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of our shares, must not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the interests in the tenant, or, if the tenant is a corporation, 10% or more of the voting power or value of all classes of stock of the tenant. Rents received from such tenant that is a taxable REIT subsidiary, however, will not be excluded from the definition of “rents from real property” as a result of this condition if either (i) at least 90% of the space at the property to which the rents relate is leased to third parties, and the rents paid by the taxable REIT subsidiary are comparable to rents paid by our other tenants for comparable space or (ii) the property is a qualified lodging facility or a qualified health care property and such property is operated on behalf of the taxable REIT subsidiary by a person who is an “eligible independent contractor” (as described below) and certain other requirements are met;
•Third, rent attributable to personal property, leased in connection with a lease of real property, must not be greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease. If this requirement is not met, then the portion of rent attributable to personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property”; and
•Fourth, for rents to qualify as rents from real property for the purpose of satisfying the gross income tests, we generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish or render services to the tenants of such property, other than through an “independent contractor” who is adequately compensated and from whom we derive no revenue or through a taxable REIT subsidiary. To the extent that impermissible services are provided by an independent contractor, the
cost of the services generally must be borne by the independent contractor. We anticipate that any services we provide directly to tenants will be “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and not otherwise considered to be provided for the tenants’ convenience. We may provide a minimal amount of “non-customary” services to tenants of our properties, other than through an independent contractor or a taxable REIT subsidiary, but we intend that our income from these services will not exceed 1% of our total gross income from the property. If the impermissible tenant services income exceeds 1% of our total income from a property, then all of the income from that property will fail to qualify as rents from real property. If the total amount of impermissible tenant services income does not exceed 1% of our total income from the property, the services will not “taint” the other income from the property (that is, it will not cause the rent paid by tenants of that property to fail to qualify as rents from real property), but the impermissible tenant services income will not qualify as rents from real property. We will be deemed to have received income from the provision of impermissible services in an amount equal to at least 150% of our direct cost of providing the service.
We monitor (and intend to continue to monitor) the activities provided at, and the non-qualifying income arising from, our properties and believe that we have not provided services at levels that will cause us to fail to meet the income tests. We provide services and may provide access to third-party service providers at some or all of our properties. Based upon our experience in the markets where the properties are located, we believe that all access to service providers and services provided to tenants by us (other than through a qualified independent contractor or a taxable REIT subsidiary) either are usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered rendered to the occupant, or, if considered impermissible services, will not result in an amount of impermissible tenant service income that will cause us to fail to meet the income test requirements. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the IRS will agree with these positions.
Income we receive that is attributable to the rental of parking spaces at the properties will constitute rents from real property for purposes of the REIT gross income tests if the services provided with respect to the parking facilities are performed by independent contractors from whom we derive no income, either directly or indirectly, or by a taxable REIT subsidiary. We believe that the income we receive that is attributable to parking facilities will meet these tests and, accordingly, will constitute rents from real property for purposes of the REIT gross income tests.
Interest Income. “Interest” generally will be non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests if it depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, interest based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales may still qualify under the gross income tests. We do not expect to derive significant amounts of interest that will not qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests.
Dividend Income. Our share of any dividends received from any taxable REIT subsidiaries will qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. We do not anticipate that we will receive sufficient dividends from any taxable REIT subsidiaries to cause us to exceed the limit on non-qualifying income under the 75% gross income test. Dividends that we receive from other qualifying REITs will qualify for purposes of both REIT income tests.
Income from Hedging Transactions. From time to time we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Any such hedging transactions could take a variety of forms, including the use of derivative instruments such as interest rate swap or cap agreements, option agreements, and futures or forward contracts. Income of a REIT, including income from a pass-through subsidiary, arising from “clearly identified” hedging transactions that are entered into to manage the risk of interest rate or price changes with respect to borrowings, including gain from the disposition of such hedging transactions, to the extent the hedging transactions hedge indebtedness incurred, or to be incurred, by the REIT to acquire or carry real estate assets (each such hedge, a “Borrowings Hedge”), will not be treated as gross income for purposes of either the 95% gross income test or the 75% gross income test. Income of a REIT arising from hedging transactions that are entered into to manage the risk of currency fluctuations with respect to our investments (each such hedge, a “Currency Hedge”) will not be treated as gross income for purposes of either the 95% gross income test or the 75% gross income test provided that the transaction is “clearly identified.” This exclusion from the 95% and 75% gross income tests also will apply if we previously entered into a Borrowings Hedge or a Currency Hedge, a portion of the hedged indebtedness or property is disposed of, and in connection with such extinguishment or disposition we enter into a new “clearly identified” hedging transaction to offset the prior hedging position. In general, for a hedging transaction to be “clearly identified,” (1) it must be identified as a hedging transaction before the end of the day on which it is acquired, originated, or entered into; and (2) the items of risks being hedged must be identified “substantially contemporaneously” with entering into the hedging transaction (generally not more than 35 days after entering into the hedging transaction). To the extent that we hedge with other types of financial instruments or in other situations, the resultant income will be treated as income that does not qualify under the 95% or 75% gross income tests unless the hedge meets certain requirements, and we elect to integrate it with a specified asset and to treat the integrated position as a synthetic debt instrument. We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT, but there can be no assurance we will be successful in this regard.
Income from Forward Sale Agreements. We may enter into forward sale agreements from time to time and, subject to certain conditions, we have the right to elect physical, cash or net share settlement under these agreements at any time and from time to time, in part or in full. In the event that we elect to settle a forward sale agreement for cash and the settlement price is below the forward sale price, we would be entitled to receive a cash payment from the applicable forward purchaser(s). Under Section 1032 of the Code, generally, no gains and losses are recognized by a corporation in dealing in its own shares, including pursuant to a “securities futures contract,” as defined in the Code by reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe that any amount received by us in exchange for our common shares would qualify for the exemption under Section 1032 of the Code, because it is not entirely clear whether a forward sale agreement qualifies as a “securities futures contract,” the U.S. federal income tax treatment of any cash settlement payment we receive is uncertain. In the event that we recognize a significant gain from the cash settlement of a forward sale agreement, we might not be able to satisfy the gross income requirements applicable to REITs under the Code. If we were to fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for such year if we were entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Code, as described below. If these relief provisions were inapplicable, we would not qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
Income from Prohibited Transactions. Any gain that we realize on the sale of any property held as inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, either directly or through pass-through subsidiaries, will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax. Under existing law, whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. However, we will not be treated as a dealer in real property for purposes of the 100% tax with respect to a real estate asset that we sell if (i) we have held the property for at least two years for the production of rental income prior to the sale, (ii) capitalized expenditures on the property in the two years preceding the sale are less than 30% of the net selling price of the property, and (iii) we either (a) have seven or fewer sales of property (excluding certain property obtained through foreclosure) for the year of sale; or (b) the aggregate adjusted basis of property sold during the year is 10% or less of the aggregate adjusted basis of all of our assets as of the beginning of the taxable year; or (c) the fair market value of property sold during the year is 10% or less of the aggregate fair market value of all of our assets as of the beginning of the taxable year; or (d) the aggregate adjusted basis of property sold during the year is 20% or less of the aggregate adjusted basis of all of our assets as of the beginning of the taxable year and the aggregate adjusted basis of property sold during the 3-year period ending with the year of sale is 10% or less of the aggregate tax basis of all of our assets as of the beginning of each of the 3 taxable years ending with the year of sale; or (e) the fair market value of property sold during the year is 20% or less of the aggregate fair market value of all of our assets as of the beginning of the taxable year and the fair market value of property sold during the 3-year period ending with the year of sale is 10% or less of the aggregate fair market value of all of our assets as of the beginning of each of the 3 taxable years ending with the year of sale. If we rely on clauses (b), (c), (d), or (e) in the preceding sentence, substantially all of the marketing and development expenditures with respect to the property sold must be made through an independent contractor from whom we derive no income or, a taxable REIT subsidiary. The sale of more than one property to one buyer as part of one transaction constitutes one sale for purposes of this “safe harbor.” We intend to hold our properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring, developing and owning our properties and to make occasional sales of the properties as are consistent with our investment objectives. However, the IRS may successfully contend that some or all of the sales made by us or subsidiary partnerships or limited liability companies are prohibited transactions. In that case, we would be required to pay the 100% penalty tax on our allocable share of the gains resulting from any such sales.
Income from Foreclosure Property. We generally will be subject to tax at the maximum corporate rate (currently 21%) on any net income from foreclosure property, including any gain from the disposition of the foreclosure property, other than income that constitutes qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Foreclosure property is real property and any personal property incident to such real property (1) that we acquire as the result of having bid on the property at foreclosure, or having otherwise reduced the property to ownership or possession by agreement or process of law, after a default (or upon imminent default) on a lease of the property or a mortgage loan held by us and secured by the property, (2) for which we acquired the related loan or lease at a time when default was not imminent or anticipated, and (3) with respect to which we made a proper election to treat the property as foreclosure property. Any gain from the sale of property for which a foreclosure property election has been made and remains in place generally will not be subject to the 100% tax on gains from prohibited transactions described above, even if the property would otherwise constitute inventory or dealer property. To the extent that we receive any income from foreclosure property that does not qualify for purposes of the 75% gross income test, we intend to make an election to treat the related property as foreclosure property if the election is available (which may not be the case with respect to any acquired “distressed loans”).
Failure to Satisfy the Gross Income Tests. If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for that year if we are entitled to relief under the Code. These relief provisions will be generally available if (1) our failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect and (2)
following our identification of the failure to meet the 75% and/or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we file a schedule with the IRS setting forth a description of each item of our gross income that satisfies the gross income tests for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income test for such taxable year in accordance with Treasury Regulations. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances, we will fail to qualify as a REIT. As discussed above, under “—Taxation of the Company as a REIT—General,” even if these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed based on the amount of non-qualifying income. We intend to take advantage of any and all relief provisions that are available to us to cure any violation of the income tests applicable to REITs.
Redetermined Amounts. Any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions, excess interest, or redetermined taxable REIT subsidiary service income we generate will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of services furnished by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries to any of our tenants, redetermined deductions and excess interest represent amounts that are deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary for amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on arm’s-length negotiations, and redetermined taxable REIT subsidiary service income is gross income (less deductions allocable thereto) of a taxable REIT subsidiary attributable to services provided to, or on behalf of, us that is less than the amounts that would have been paid by us to the taxable REIT subsidiary if based on arm’s-length negotiations. Rents we receive will not constitute redetermined rents if they qualify for the safe harbor provisions contained in the Code. Safe harbor provisions are provided where:
•amounts are excluded from the definition of impermissible tenant service income as a result of satisfying the 1% de minimis exception;
•a taxable REIT subsidiary renders a significant amount of similar services to unrelated parties and the charges for such services are substantially comparable;
•rents paid to us by tenants leasing at least 25% of the net leasable space of the REIT’s property who are not receiving services from the taxable REIT subsidiary are substantially comparable to the rents paid by the REIT’s tenants leasing comparable space who are receiving such services from the taxable REIT subsidiary and the charge for the service is separately stated; or
•the taxable REIT subsidiary’s gross income from the service is not less than 150% of the taxable REIT subsidiary’s direct cost of furnishing the service.
While we anticipate that any fees paid to a taxable REIT subsidiary for tenant services will reflect arm’s-length rates, a taxable REIT subsidiary may under certain circumstances provide tenant services which do not satisfy any of the safe-harbor provisions described above. Nevertheless, these determinations are inherently factual, and the IRS has broad discretion to assert that amounts paid between related parties should be reallocated to clearly reflect their respective incomes. If the IRS successfully made such an assertion, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on the redetermined rent, redetermined deductions or excess interest, as applicable.
Asset Tests
At the close of each calendar quarter, we must satisfy the following tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets. For purposes of the asset tests, a REIT is not treated as owning the stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary or an equity interest in any entity treated as a partnership otherwise disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Instead, a REIT is treated as owning its proportionate share of the assets held by such entity.
•At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by some combination of “real estate assets,” cash, cash items, and U.S. government securities. For purposes of this test, real estate assets include interests in real property, such as land and buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs and debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs, some types of mortgage-backed securities, mortgage loans, personal property leased in connection with real property to the extent that rents attributable to such personal property are treated as “rents from real property”, and stock or debt instruments held for less than one year purchased with an offering of our shares or long term debt. Assets that do not qualify for purposes of the 75% asset test are subject to the additional asset tests described below.
•Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities other than those described in the first bullet above.
•Except for securities described in the first bullet above and the last bullet below and securities in qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets.
•Except for securities described in the first bullet above and the last bullet below and securities in qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries, we may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding voting securities.
•Except for securities described in the first bullet above and the last bullet below and securities in qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries, and certain types of indebtedness that are not treated as securities for purposes of this test, as discussed below, we may not own more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer.
•Not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by the securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.
•Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by debt instruments issued by publicly offered REITs that are “nonqualified” debt instruments (e.g., not secured by real property or interests in real property).
The 10% value test does not apply to certain “straight debt” and other excluded securities, as described in the Code, including (1) loans to individuals or estates; (2) obligations to pay rent from real property; (3) rental agreements described in Section 467 of the Code; (4) any security issued by other REITs; (5) certain securities issued by a state, the District of Columbia, a foreign government, or a political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and (6) any other arrangement as determined by the IRS. In addition, (1) a REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not considered a security for purposes of the 10% value test; (2) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by the partnership if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income is derived from sources that would qualify for the 75% REIT gross income test; and (3) any debt instrument issued by a partnership (other than straight debt or other excluded security) will not be considered a security issued by a partnership to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership.
For purposes of the 10% value test, debt will meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if (1) neither us, nor any of our controlled taxable REIT subsidiaries (i.e., taxable REIT subsidiaries more than 50% of the vote or value of the outstanding stock of which is directly or indirectly owned by us), own any securities not described in the preceding paragraph that have an aggregate value greater than 1% of the issuer’s outstanding securities, as calculated under the Code, (2) the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a sum certain in money, (3) the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and (4) the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion or similar factors. However, contingencies regarding time of payment and interest are permissible for purposes of qualifying as a straight debt security if either (1) such contingency does not have the effect of changing the effective yield of maturity, as determined under the Code, other than a change in the annual yield to maturity that does not exceed the greater of (i) 5% of the annual yield to maturity or (ii) 0.25%, or (2) neither the aggregate issue price nor the aggregate face amount of the issuer’s debt instruments held by the REIT exceeds $1,000,000 and not more than 12 months of unaccrued interest can be required to be prepaid thereunder. In addition, debt will not be disqualified from being treated as “straight debt” solely because the time or amount of payment is subject to a contingency upon a default or the exercise of a prepayment right by the issuer of the debt, provided that such contingency is consistent with customary commercial practice.
We own one subsidiary that has elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Our taxable REIT subsidiary is taxable as a non-REIT C corporation and has elected, together with us, to be treated as our taxable REIT subsidiary. So long as our taxable REIT subsidiary qualifies as such, we will not be subject to the 5% asset test, 10% voting securities limitation or 10% value limitation with respect to our ownership interest in the taxable REIT subsidiary. We may acquire securities in other taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future. We believe that the aggregate value of our interests in our taxable REIT subsidiary does not exceed, and believe that in the future it will not exceed, 20% of the aggregate value of our gross assets. To the extent that we own an interest in an issuer that does not qualify as a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary, or a taxable REIT subsidiary, we believe that our pro rata share of the value of the securities, including debt, of any such issuer does not exceed 5% of the total value of our assets. Moreover, with respect to each issuer in which we own an interest that does not qualify as a qualified REIT subsidiary or a taxable REIT subsidiary, we believe that our ownership of the securities of any such issuer complies with the 10% voting securities limitation and 10% value limitation.
No independent appraisals have been obtained to support these conclusions. In this regard, however, we cannot provide any assurance that the IRS will agree with our determinations.
Failure to Satisfy the Asset Tests. The asset tests must be satisfied not only on the last day of the calendar quarter in which we, directly or through pass-through subsidiaries, acquire securities in the applicable issuer, but also on the last day of the calendar quarter in which we increase our ownership of securities of such issuer, including as a result of increasing our interest in pass-through subsidiaries. After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, we will not lose our status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in the relative values of our assets (including a discrepancy caused solely by the change in the foreign currency exchange rate used to value a foreign asset). If failure to satisfy the asset tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, we can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. We intend to continue to maintain adequate records of the value of our assets to ensure compliance with the asset tests and to take any available action within 30 days after the close of any quarter as may be required to cure any noncompliance with the asset tests. Although we plan to take steps to ensure that we satisfy such tests for any quarter with respect to which testing is to occur, there can be no assurance that such steps will always be successful. If we fail to timely cure any noncompliance with the asset tests, we will cease to qualify as a REIT, unless we satisfy certain relief provisions.
The failure to satisfy the 5% asset test, or the 10% vote or value asset tests can be remedied even after the 30-day cure period under certain circumstances. Specifically, if we fail these asset tests at the end of any quarter and such failure is not cured within 30 days thereafter, we may dispose of sufficient assets (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which our identification of the failure to satisfy these asset tests occurred) to cure such a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of our assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000. If we fail any of the other asset tests or our failure of the 5% and 10% asset tests is in excess of the de minimis amount described above, as long as such failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, we are permitted to avoid disqualification as a REIT, after the 30-day cure period, by taking steps including the disposing of sufficient assets to meet the asset test (generally within six months after the last day of the quarter in which our identification of the failure to satisfy the REIT asset test occurred), paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate income tax rate of the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets during the period in which we failed to satisfy the asset test, and filing in accordance with applicable Treasury Regulations a schedule with the IRS that describes the assets that caused us to fail to satisfy the asset test(s). We intend to take advantage of any and all relief provisions that are available to us to cure any violation of the asset tests applicable to REITs. In certain circumstances, utilization of such provisions could result in us being required to pay an excise or penalty tax, which could be significant in amount.
Annual Distribution Requirements
To qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our shareholders each year in an amount at least equal to:
•the sum of: (1) 90% of our “REIT taxable income,” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain; and (2) 90% of our after tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property; minus
•the excess of the sum of specified items of non-cash income over 5% of our REIT taxable income, computed without regard to our net capital gain and the deduction for dividends paid.
For purposes of this test, non-cash income means income attributable to leveled stepped rents, original issue discount included in our taxable income without the receipt of a corresponding payment, cancellation of indebtedness or income attributable to a like-kind exchange that is later determined to be taxable.
We generally must make dividend distributions in the taxable year to which they relate. Dividend distributions may be made in the following year in two circumstances. First, if we declare a dividend in October, November, or December of any year with a record date in one of these months and pay the dividend on or before January 31 of the following year. Such distributions are treated as both paid by us and received by each shareholder on December 31 of the year in which they are declared. Second, distributions may be made in the following year if they are declared before we timely file our tax return for the year and if made with or before the first regular dividend payment after such declaration. These distributions are taxable to our shareholders in the year in which paid, even though the distributions relate to our prior taxable year for purposes of the 90% distribution requirement.
To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be required to pay tax on that amount at regular corporate tax rates. We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements. In certain circumstances we may elect to retain, rather than distribute, our net long-term capital gains and pay tax on such gains. In this case, we could elect for our shareholders to include their proportionate share of such undistributed long-term capital gains in income, and to receive a corresponding
credit for their share of the tax that we paid. Our shareholders would then increase their adjusted basis of their stock by the difference between (1) the amounts of capital gain dividends that we designated and that they included in their taxable income, minus (2) the tax that we paid on their behalf with respect to that income.
To the extent that in the future we may have available net operating losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Our deduction for any net operating loss carryforwards arising from losses we sustain in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 is limited to 80% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid), and any unused portion of such losses may be carried forward indefinitely.
If we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year, and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be subject to a non-deductible 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed, and (y) the amounts of income we retained and on which we paid corporate income tax.
We expect that our REIT taxable income (determined before our deduction for dividends paid) will be less than our cash flow because of depreciation and other non-cash charges included in computing REIT taxable income. Accordingly, we anticipate that we will generally have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the distribution requirements described above. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet these distribution requirements due to timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, and the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses in arriving at our taxable income.
The Code limits the deductibility of net interest expense paid or accrued on debt properly allocable to a trade or business to 30% of “adjusted taxable income,” subject to certain exceptions. Any deduction in excess of the limitation is carried forward and may be used in a subsequent year, subject to the 30% limitation. Adjusted taxable income is determined without regard to certain deductions, including those for net interest expense and net operating loss. However, for the 2021 taxable year, we made a timely election (which is irrevocable), such that the 30% limitation does not apply. This election is available for a trade or business involving real property development, redevelopment, construction, reconstruction, rental, operation, acquisition, conversion, disposition, management, leasing or brokerage, within the meaning of Section 469(c)(7)(C) of the Code. As a result of this election, depreciable real property (including certain improvements) held by the relevant trade or business must be depreciated under the alternative depreciation system under the Code, which is generally less favorable than the generally applicable system of depreciation under the Code. If it was subsequently determined that this election was not in fact available with respect to all or certain of our business activities, this interest deduction limitation could result in us having more REIT taxable income and thus increase the amount of distributions we must make to comply with the REIT requirements and avoid incurring corporate level tax. Similarly, the limitation could cause our taxable REIT subsidiary (or any taxable REIT subsidiary we have in the future) to have greater taxable income and thus potentially greater corporate tax liability.
Furthermore, under Section 451 of the Code, subject to certain exceptions, we must accrue income for U.S. federal income tax purposes no later than when such income is taken into account as revenue in our financial statements, which could create additional differences between REIT taxable income and the receipt of cash attributable to such income. In addition, Section 162(m) of the Code places a per-employee limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that a publicly held corporation may deduct in any one year with respect to its chief executive officer and certain other highly compensated executive officers. If these timing differences occur, we may need to arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings or need to pay dividends in the form of taxable stock dividends in order to meet the distribution requirements.
We may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to our shareholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. However, we will be required to pay interest to the IRS based upon the amount of any deduction claimed for deficiency dividends.
Record-Keeping Requirements
We are required to comply with applicable record-keeping requirements. Failure to comply could result in monetary fines.
Failure to Qualify as a REIT
If we fail to satisfy one or more requirements for REIT qualification other than gross income and asset tests that have the specific savings clauses, we can avoid termination of our REIT qualification by paying a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure, provided that our noncompliance was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect.
If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and the relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will not be required to make any distributions to shareholders, and any distributions that are made to shareholders will not be deductible by us. As a result, our failure to qualify for taxation as a REIT would significantly reduce the cash available for distributions by us to our shareholders. In addition, if we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT, all distributions to shareholders, to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, will be taxable as regular corporate dividends. For taxable years before January 1, 2026, generally, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations. Alternatively, such dividends paid to U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates may be taxable at the preferential income tax rates (i.e., the 20% maximum U.S. federal rate (excluding the 3.8% tax on “net investment income”)) for qualified dividends. In addition, subject to the limitations of the Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends-received deduction.
Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. In addition, if we merge with another REIT and we are the “successor” to the other REIT, the other REIT’s disqualification from taxation as a REIT would prevent us from being taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the other REIT’s qualification was lost. There can be no assurance that we would be entitled to any statutory relief. We intend to take advantage of any and all relief provisions that are available to us to cure any violation of the requirements applicable to REITs.
Taxation of U.S. Shareholders
Taxation of TaxableU.S. Shareholders
This section summarizes the taxation of U.S. shareholders that are not tax-exempt organizations. For these purposes, the term “U.S. shareholder” is a beneficial owner of our shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
•a citizen or resident of the United States;
•a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of a political subdivision thereof (including the District of Columbia);
•an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
•any trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding our shares should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the partner of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our shares by the partnership.
Distributions Generally. So long as we qualify as a REIT, distributions out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that are not designated as capital gains dividends or “qualified dividend income” will be taxable to our taxable U.S. shareholders as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction in the case of U.S. shareholders that are corporations. However, for tax years prior to 2026, generally U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of the aggregate amount of ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations. For purposes of determining whether distributions to holders of shares are out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, our earnings and profits will be allocated first to any outstanding preferred shares and then to our outstanding common shares. Dividends received from REITs are generally not eligible to be taxed at the preferential qualified dividend income rates currently available to individual U.S. shareholders who receive dividends from taxable subchapter “C” corporations.
Capital Gain Dividends. We may elect to designate distributions of our net capital gain as “capital gain dividends.” Distributions that we properly designate as “capital gain dividends” will be taxable to our taxable U.S. shareholders as long-term capital gains without regard to the period for which the U.S. shareholder that receives such distribution has held its shares. Designations made by us will only be effective to the extent that they comply with Revenue Ruling 89-81, which requires that distributions made to different classes of shares be composed proportionately of dividends of a particular type. If we designate any portion of a dividend as a capital gain dividend, a U.S. shareholder will receive an IRS Form 1099-DIV indicating the amount that will be taxable to the shareholder as capital gain. Corporate shareholders, however, may be required to treat up to
20% of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income. Recipients of capital gain dividends from us that are taxed at corporate income tax rates will be taxed at the normal corporate income tax rates on these dividends.
We may elect to retain and pay taxes on some or all of our net long-term capital gains, in which case U.S. shareholders will be treated as having received, solely for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our undistributed capital gains as well as a corresponding credit or refund, as the case may be, for taxes that we paid on such undistributed capital gains. A U.S. shareholder will increase the basis in its shares by the difference between the amount of capital gain included in its income and the amount of tax it is deemed to have paid. A U.S. shareholder that is a corporation will appropriately adjust its earnings and profits for the retained capital gain in accordance with Treasury Regulations to be prescribed by the IRS. Our earnings and profits will be adjusted appropriately.
We will classify portions of any designated capital gain dividend or undistributed capital gain as either:
•a long-term capital gain distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 20% (excluding the 3.8% tax on “net investment income”), and taxable to U.S. shareholders that are corporations at a maximum rate of 21%; or
•an “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain” distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 25%, to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions.
Distributions from us in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. shareholder to the extent that they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the U.S. shareholder’s shares in respect of which the distributions were made. Rather, the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of these shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a U.S. shareholder’s shares of our shares, the U.S. shareholder generally must include such distributions in income as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend that we declare in October, November or December of any year and that is payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated as both paid by us and received by the shareholder on December 31 of such year, provided that we actually pay the dividend before the end of January of the following calendar year.
To the extent that we have available net operating losses and capital losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that we must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See “—Taxation of the Company as a REIT” and “—Requirements for Qualification as a REIT—Annual Distribution Requirements.” Such losses, however, are not passed through to U.S. shareholders and do not offset income of U.S. shareholders from other sources, nor would such losses affect the character of any distributions that we make, which are generally subject to tax in the hands of U.S. shareholders to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits.
The maximum amount of dividends that we may designate as capital gain and as “qualified dividend income” (discussed below) with respect to any taxable year may not exceed the dividends actually paid by us with respect to such year, including dividends paid by us in the succeeding tax year that relate back to the prior tax year for purposes of determining our dividends paid deduction.
Qualified Dividend Income. We may elect to designate a portion of our distributions paid to shareholders as “qualified dividend income.” A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders as capital gain, provided that the shareholder has held the shares with respect to which the distribution is made for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the date on which such shares become ex-dividend with respect to the relevant distribution. The maximum amount of our distributions eligible to be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the sum of:
•the qualified dividend income received by us during such taxable year from non-REIT corporations (including our taxable REIT subsidiaries);
•the excess of any “undistributed” REIT taxable income recognized during the immediately preceding year over the U.S. federal income tax paid by us with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and
•the excess of (i) any income recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a “C” corporation with respect to which the Company is required to pay U.S. federal income tax, over (ii) the U.S. federal income tax paid by us with respect to such built-in gain.
Generally, dividends that we receive will be treated as qualified dividend income for purposes of the first bullet above if (A) the dividends are received from (i) a U.S. corporation (other than a REIT or a RIC), (ii) any of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or (iii) a “qualifying foreign corporation,” and (B) specified holding period requirements and other requirements are met. A foreign corporation (other than a “foreign personal holding company,” a “foreign investment company,” or “passive foreign investment company”) will be a qualifying foreign corporation if it is incorporated in a possession of the United States, the corporation is eligible for benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States that the Secretary of Treasury determines is satisfactory, or the stock of the foreign corporation on which the dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. We generally expect that an insignificant portion, if any, of our distributions from us will consist of qualified dividend income. If we designate any portion of a dividend as qualified dividend income, a U.S. shareholder will receive an IRS Form 1099-DIV indicating the amount that will be taxable to the shareholder as qualified dividend income.
Passive Activity Losses and Investment Interest Limitations. Distributions we make and gain arising from the sale or exchange by a U.S. shareholder of our shares will not be treated as passive activity income. As a result, U.S. shareholders generally will not be able to apply any “passive losses” against this income or gain. Distributions we make, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment interest limitation. A U.S. shareholder may elect, depending on its particular situation, to treat capital gain dividends, capital gains from the disposition of shares and income designated as qualified dividend income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation, in which case the applicable capital gains will be taxed at ordinary income rates. We will notify shareholders regarding the portions of our distributions for each year that constitute ordinary income, return of capital and qualified dividend income.
Distributions to Holders of Depositary Shares. Owners of depositary shares will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they were owners of the underlying preferred shares represented by such depositary shares. Accordingly, such owners will be entitled to take into account, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, income and deductions to which they would be entitled if they were direct holders of underlying preferred shares. In addition, (i) no gain or loss will be recognized for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the withdrawal of certificates evidencing the underlying preferred shares in exchange for depositary receipts, (ii) the tax basis of each share of the underlying preferred shares to an exchanging owner of depositary shares will, upon such exchange, be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the depositary shares exchanged therefor, and (iii) the holding period for the underlying preferred shares in the hands of an exchanging owner of depositary shares will include the period during which such person owned such depositary shares.
Dispositions of Our Shares. If a U.S. shareholder sells, redeems or otherwise disposes of its shares in a taxable transaction, it will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received on the sale or other disposition and the holder’s adjusted basis in the shares for tax purposes. In general, a U.S. shareholder’s adjusted basis will equal the U.S. shareholder’s acquisition cost, increased by the excess for net capital gains deemed distributed to the U.S. shareholder (discussed above) less tax deemed paid on it and reduced by returns on capital.
In general, capital gains recognized by individuals and other non-corporate U.S. shareholders upon the sale or disposition of our shares will be subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 20% (excluding the 3.8% tax on “net investment income”), if our shares are held for more than one year and will be taxed at ordinary income rates of up to 37% if the stock is held for one year or less. Gains recognized by U.S. shareholders that are corporations are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 21%, whether or not such gains are classified as long-term capital gains. The IRS has the authority to prescribe, but has not yet prescribed, Treasury Regulations that would apply a capital gain tax rate of 25% (which is higher than the long-term capital gain tax rates for non-corporate U.S. shareholders) to a portion of capital gain realized by a non-corporate U.S. shareholder on the sale of the Company’s shares that would correspond to the REIT’s “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.” U.S. shareholders should consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their capital gain tax liability.
Capital losses recognized by a U.S. shareholder upon the disposition of our shares that were held for more than one year at the time of disposition will be considered long-term capital losses and are generally available only to offset capital gain income of the shareholder but not ordinary income (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year). In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of our shares by a U.S. shareholder who has held the shares for six months or less, after applying holding period rules, will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of distributions that we make that are required to be treated by the U.S. shareholder as long-term capital gain.
If a shareholder recognizes a loss upon a subsequent disposition of our shares in an amount that exceeds a prescribed threshold, it is possible that the provisions of Treasury Regulations involving “reportable transactions” could apply, with a resulting requirement to separately disclose the loss-generating transaction to the IRS. These regulations, though directed towards “tax shelters,” are broadly written, and apply to transactions that would not typically be considered tax shelters. The Code imposes
significant penalties for failure to comply with these requirements. U.S. shareholders should consult their tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to the receipt or disposition of our shares, or transactions that we might undertake directly or indirectly.
Redemption of Preferred Shares and Depositary Shares. Whenever we redeem any preferred shares held by the depositary, the depositary will redeem as of the same redemption date the number of depositary shares representing the preferred shares so redeemed. The treatment accorded to any redemption by us for cash (as distinguished from a sale, exchange or other disposition) of our preferred shares to a holder of such preferred shares can only be determined on the basis of the particular facts as to each holder at the time of redemption. In general, a holder of our preferred shares will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount received by the holder of such shares upon the redemption and such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the preferred shares redeemed (provided the preferred shares are held as a capital asset) if such redemption (i) is ‘‘not essentially equivalent to a dividend’’ with respect to the holder of the preferred shares under Section 302(b)(1) of the Code, (ii) is a “substantially disproportionate” redemption with respect to the shareholder under Section 302(b)(2) of the Code, or (iii) results in a ‘‘complete termination’’ of the holder’s interest in all classes of our shares under Section 302(b)(3) of the Code. In applying these tests, there must be taken into account not only any series or class of the preferred shares being redeemed, but also such holder’s ownership of other classes of our shares and any options (including stock purchase rights) to acquire any of the foregoing. The holder of our preferred shares also must take into account any such securities (including options) which are considered to be owned by such holder by reason of the constructive ownership rules set forth in Sections 318 and 302(c) of the Code.
If the holder of preferred shares owns (actually or constructively) none of our voting shares, or owns an insubstantial amount of our voting shares, based upon current law, it is probable that the redemption of preferred shares from such a holder would be considered to be ‘‘not essentially equivalent to a dividend.’’ However, whether a distribution is ‘‘not essentially equivalent to a dividend’’ depends on all of the facts and circumstances, and a holder of our preferred shares intending to rely on any of these tests at the time of redemption should consult its tax advisor to determine their application to its particular situation.
Satisfaction of the “substantially disproportionate” and “complete termination” exceptions is dependent upon compliance with the respective objective tests set forth in Section 302(b)(2) and Section 302(b)(3) of the Code. A distribution to a holder of preferred shares will be “substantially disproportionate” if the percentage of our outstanding voting shares actually and constructively owned by the shareholder immediately following the redemption of preferred shares (treating preferred shares redeemed as not outstanding) is less than 80% of the percentage of our outstanding voting shares actually and constructively owned by the shareholder immediately before the redemption, and immediately following the redemption the shareholder actually and constructively owns less than 50% of the total combined voting power of the Company. Because the Company’s preferred shares are nonvoting shares, a shareholder would have to reduce such holder’s holdings (if any) in our classes of voting shares to satisfy this test.
If the redemption does not meet any of the tests under Section 302 of the Code, then the redemption proceeds received from our preferred shares will be treated as a distribution on our shares as described under ‘‘—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders-Distributions Generally,’’ and ‘‘—Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders-Distributions Generally.’’ If the redemption of a holder’s preferred shares is taxed as a dividend, the adjusted basis of such holder’s redeemed preferred shares will be transferred to any other shares held by the holder. If the holder owns no other shares, under certain circumstances, such basis may be transferred to a related person, or it may be lost entirely.
With respect to a redemption of our preferred shares that is treated as a distribution with respect to our shares, which is not otherwise taxable as a dividend, the IRS had proposed Treasury Regulations that would require any basis reduction associated with such a redemption to be applied on a share-by-share basis which could result in taxable gain with respect to some shares, even though the holder’s aggregate basis for the shares would be sufficient to absorb the entire amount of the redemption distribution (in excess of any amount of such distribution treated as a dividend). Additionally, these proposed Treasury Regulations did not permit the transfer of basis in the redeemed shares of the preferred shares to the remaining shares held (directly or indirectly) by the redeemed holder. Instead, the unrecovered basis in our preferred shares would be treated as a deferred loss to be recognized when certain conditions are satisfied. These proposed Treasury Regulations have been withdrawn and, although the IRS has reaffirmed its support for a share-by-share basis recovery approach, there is no indication as to whether regulations or other guidance on this issue will be promulgated in the future.
Net Investment Income Tax. In certain circumstances, certain U.S. shareholders that are individuals, estates or trusts are subject to a 3.8% tax on “net investment income,” which includes, among other things, dividends on and gains from the sale or other disposition of REIT shares. U.S. shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding this legislation.
Expansion of Medicare Tax. The temporary 20% deduction allowed by Section 199A of the Code with respect to ordinary REIT
dividends received by non-corporate taxpayers is allowed only for purposes of Chapter 1 of the Code and thus is apparently not allowed as a deduction allocable to such dividends for purposes of determining the amount of net investment income, described above, subject to the 3.8% Medicare tax, which is imposed under Chapter 2A of the Code. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding this legislation.
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders
U.S. tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S. federal income taxation. Such entities, however, may be subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI. While some investments in real estate may generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that dividend distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity generally do not constitute UBTI. Based on that ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt shareholder has not held our shares as “debt financed property” within the meaning of the Code (i.e., where the acquisition or holding of our shares is financed through a borrowing by the U.S. tax-exempt shareholder), (2) our shares are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business of a U.S. tax-exempt shareholder, and (3) we do not hold an asset that gives rise to “excess inclusion income,” distributions that we make and income from the sale of our shares generally should not give rise to UBTI to a U.S. tax-exempt shareholder.
Tax-exempt shareholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, or qualified group legal services plans exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9) or (c)(17) of the Code, respectively, or single parent title-holding corporations exempt under Section 501(c)(2) and whose income is payable to any of the aforementioned tax-exempt organizations, are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally require such shareholders to characterize distributions from us as UBTI unless the organization is able to properly claim a deduction for amounts set aside or placed in reserve for certain purposes so as to offset the income generated by its investment in our shares. These shareholders should consult with their tax advisors concerning these set aside and reserve requirements.
In certain circumstances, a pension trust (1) that is described in Section 401(a) of the Code, (2) is tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code, and (3) that owns more than 10% of the value of our shares could be required to treat a percentage of the dividends as UBTI, if we are a “pension-held REIT.” We will not be a pension-held REIT unless:
•either (1) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our stock, or (2) one or more pension trusts, each individually holding more than 10% of the value of our shares, collectively own more than 50% of the value of our shares; and
•we would not have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of the Code provides that shares owned by such trusts shall be treated, for purposes of the requirement that not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares of a REIT is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer “individuals” (as defined in the Code to include certain entities), as owned by the beneficiaries of such trusts.
The percentage of any REIT dividend from a “pension-held REIT” that is treated as UBTI is equal to the ratio of the UBTI earned by the REIT, treating the REIT as if it were a pension trust and therefore subject to tax on UBTI, to the total gross income of the REIT. An exception applies where the percentage is less than 5% for any year, in which case none of the dividends would be treated as UBTI. The provisions requiring pension trusts to treat a portion of REIT distributions as UBTI will not apply if the REIT is able to satisfy the “not closely held requirement” without relying upon the “look-through” exception with respect to pension trusts. As a result of certain limitations on the transfer and ownership of our common and preferred shares contained in our declaration of trust, we do not expect to be classified as a “pension-held REIT,” and accordingly, the tax treatment described above with respect to pension-held REITs should be inapplicable to our tax-exempt shareholders.
Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders
The following discussion addresses the rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of non-U.S. shareholders. For purposes of this summary, “non-U.S. shareholder” is a beneficial owner of our shares that is not a U.S. shareholder (as defined above under “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders”). These rules are complex, and no attempt is made herein to provide more than a brief summary of such rules. Accordingly, the discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation and does not address state local or foreign tax consequences that may be relevant to a non-U.S. shareholder in light of its particular circumstances. Prospective non-U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors to determine the impact of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income tax laws on their ownership of our common shares or preferred shares, including any reporting requirements.
Distributions Generally. As described in the discussion below, distributions paid by us with respect to our common shares, our preferred shares and depositary shares will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as either:
•ordinary income dividends;
•long-term capital gain; or
•return of capital distributions.
This discussion assumes that our shares will continue to be considered regularly traded on an established securities market for purposes of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, provisions described below. If our shares are no longer regularly traded on an established securities market, the tax considerations described below would materially differ.
Ordinary Income Dividends. A distribution paid by us to a non-U.S. shareholder will be treated as an ordinary income dividend if the distribution is payable out of our earnings and profits and:
•not attributable to our net capital gain; or
•the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain from the sale of U.S. Real Property Interests (“USRPIs”), and the non-U.S. shareholder owns 10% or less of the value of our common shares at all times during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution.
In general, non-U.S. shareholders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of our shares. In cases where the dividend income from a non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in our shares is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the non-U.S. shareholder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as U.S. shareholders are taxed with respect to such dividends. Such income must generally be reported on a U.S. income tax return filed by or on behalf of the non-U.S. shareholder. The income may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in the case of a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation.
Generally, we will withhold and remit to the IRS 30% (or lower applicable treaty rate) of dividend distributions (including distributions that may later be determined to have been made in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits) that could not be treated as capital gain distributions with respect to the non-U.S. shareholder (and that are not deemed to be capital gain dividends for purposes of the FIRPTA withholding rules described below) unless:
•a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. shareholder files an IRS Form W-8BEN or Form W-8BEN-E, as applicable, evidencing eligibility for that reduced treaty rate with us; or
•the non-U.S. shareholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is income effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s trade or business; or
•the non-U.S. shareholder is a foreign sovereign or controlled entity of a foreign sovereign and also provides an IRS Form W-8EXP claiming an exemption from withholding under section 892 of the Code.
Return of Capital Distributions. Unless (A) our shares constitute a USRPI, as described in “—Dispositions of Our Shares” below, or (B) either (1) the non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in our shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. shareholder (in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. shareholders with respect to such gain) or (2) the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States (in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gain for the year), distributions that we make which are not dividends out of our earnings and profits will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. If we cannot determine at the time a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. The non-U.S. shareholder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it subsequently is determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. If our shares constitute a USRPI, as described below, distributions that we make in excess of the sum of (1) the non-U.S. shareholder’s proportionate share of our earnings and profits, and (2) the non-U.S. shareholder’s basis in its shares, will be taxed under FIRPTA at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a U.S. shareholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding tax at a rate of 15% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the
non-U.S. shareholder’s share of our earnings and profits.
Capital Gain Dividends. A distribution paid by us to a non-U.S. shareholder will be treated as long-term capital gain if the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits and:
•the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain (other than from the sale of USRPIs) and we timely designate the distribution as a capital gain dividend; or
•the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain from the sale of USRPIs and the non-U.S. common shareholder owns more than 10% of the value of common shares at any point during the one-year period ending on the date on which the distribution is paid.
Long-term capital gain that a non-U.S. shareholder is deemed to receive from a capital gain dividend that is not attributable to the sale of USRPIs generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the hands of the non-U.S. shareholder unless:
•the non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in our shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. shareholder, in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. shareholders with respect to any gain, except that a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation also may be subject to the 30% (or lower applicable treaty rate) branch profits tax; or
•the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on his capital gains.
Under FIRPTA, distributions that are attributable to net capital gain from the sale by us of USRPIs and paid to a non-U.S. shareholder that owns more than 10% of the value of our shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date on which the distribution is paid will be subject to U.S. tax as income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. The FIRPTA tax will apply to these distributions whether or not the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend, and, in the case of a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation, such distributions also may be subject to the 30% (or lower applicable treaty rate) branch profits tax.
Any distribution paid by us that is treated as a capital gain dividend or that could be treated as a capital gain dividend with respect to a particular non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to special withholding rules under FIRPTA. We will withhold and remit to the IRS 21% (or, to the extent provided in Treasury Regulations, 20%) of any distribution that could be treated as a capital gain dividend with respect to the non-U.S. shareholder, whether or not the distribution is attributable to the sale by us of USRPIs. The amount withheld is creditable against the non-U.S. shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or refundable when the non-U.S. shareholder properly and timely files a tax return with the IRS.
Certain non-U.S. pension funds that are “qualified foreign pension funds” as defined by Section 897(l) of the Code and certain non-U.S. publicly traded entities that are “qualified shareholders” as defined by Section 897(k) of the Code may be entitled to exceptions to the FIRPTA tax with respect to distributions we pay. Non-U.S. shareholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the application of these exceptions.
Undistributed Capital Gain. Although the law is not entirely clear on the matter, it appears that amounts designated by us as undistributed capital gains in respect of our shares held by non-U.S. shareholders generally should be treated in the same manner as actual distributions by us of capital gain dividends. Under this approach, the non-U.S. shareholder would be able to offset as a credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability resulting therefrom their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the undistributed capital gains treated as long-term capital gains to the non-U.S. shareholder, and generally receive from the IRS a refund to the extent their proportionate share of the tax paid by us were to exceed the non-U.S. shareholder’s actual U.S. federal income tax liability on such long-term capital gain. If we were to designate any portion of our net capital gain as undistributed capital gain, a non-U.S. shareholder should consult its tax advisors regarding taxation of such undistributed capital gain.
Dispositions of Our Shares. Unless our shares constitute a USRPI, a sale of our shares by a non-U.S. shareholder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation under FIRPTA. Generally, subject to the discussion below regarding dispositions by “qualified shareholders” and “qualified foreign pension funds,” with respect to any particular shareholder, our shares will constitute a USRPI only if each of the following three statements is true:
•50% or more of our assets on any of certain testing dates during a prescribed testing period consist of interests in real
property located within the United States, excluding for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a capacity as creditor;
•We are not a “domestically-controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically-controlled qualified investment entity includes a REIT, less than 50% of value of which is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. shareholders at all times during a specified testing period. Although we believe that we are and will remain a domestically-controlled REIT, because our shares are publicly traded, we cannot guarantee that we are or will remain a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity; and
•Either (a) our shares are not “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations, on an established securities market; or (b) our shares are “regularly traded” on an established securities market and the selling non-U.S. shareholder has held over 10% of our outstanding common shares any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale.
Certain non-U.S. pension funds that are “qualified foreign pension funds” as defined by Section 897(l) of the Code and certain non-U.S. publicly traded entities that are “qualified shareholders” as defined by Section 897(k) of the Code may be entitled to exceptions to the FIRPTA tax with respect to the sale of our shares. Non-U.S. shareholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the application of these exceptions.
Specific wash sales rules applicable to sales of shares in a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity could result in gain recognition, taxable under FIRPTA, upon the sale of our shares even if we are a domestically-controlled qualified investment entity. These rules would apply if a non-U.S. shareholder (1) disposes of our shares within a 30-day period preceding the ex-dividend date of a distribution, any portion of which, but for the disposition, would have been taxable to such non-U.S. shareholder as gain from the sale or exchange of a USRPI, (2) acquires, or enters into a contract or option to acquire, other shares of our shares during the 61-day period that begins 30 days prior to such ex-dividend date, and (3) if our shares are “regularly traded” on an established securities market in the United States, such non-US stockholder has owned more than 10% of our outstanding shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of such distribution.
If gain on the sale of our shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. shareholder would be required to file a U.S. federal income tax return and would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to such gain, subject to the applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals, and, if our common shares were not “regularly traded” on an established securities market, the purchaser of the shares generally would be required to withhold 15% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.
Gain from the sale of our shares that would not otherwise be subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a non-U.S. shareholder as follows: (1) if the non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in our shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. shareholder, the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to such gain, or (2) if the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gain.
Taxation of Holders of Our Warrants and Rights
Warrants. Holders of our warrants will not generally recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a warrant. A holder’s basis in the preferred shares, depositary shares representing preferred shares or common shares, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will be equal to the sum of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the warrant and the exercise price paid. A holder’s holding period in the preferred shares, depositary shares representing preferred shares or common shares, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will not include the period during which the warrant was held by the holder. Upon the expiration of a warrant, the holder will recognize a capital loss in an amount equal to the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Upon the sale or exchange of a warrant to a person other than us, a holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the warrant was held for more than one year. Upon the sale of the warrant to us, the IRS may argue that the holder should recognize ordinary income on the sale. Prospective holders of our warrants should consult their own tax advisors as to the consequences of a sale of a warrant to us.
Rights. In the event of a rights offering, the tax consequences of the receipt, expiration, and exercise of the rights we issue will be addressed in detail in a prospectus supplement. Prospective holders of our rights should review the applicable prospectus supplement in connection with the ownership of any rights and consult their own tax advisors as to the consequences of investing in the rights.
Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan
General
We offer shareholders and prospective shareholders the opportunity to participate in our Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, which is referred to herein as the “DRIP.”
Although we do not currently offer any discount in connection with the DRIP, nor do we plan to offer such a discount at present, we reserve the right to offer in the future a discount on shares purchased, not to exceed 5%, with reinvested dividends or cash distributions and shares purchased through the optional cash investment feature. This discussion assumes that we do not offer a discount in connection with the DRIP. If we were to offer a discount in connection with the DRIP, the tax considerations described below would materially differ. In the event that we offer a discount in connection with the DRIP, shareholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the tax treatment to them of receiving a discount.
Amounts Treated as a Distribution
Generally, a DRIP participant will be treated as having received a distribution with respect to our shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount determined as described below.
•A shareholder who participates in the dividend reinvestment feature of the DRIP and whose dividends are reinvested in our shares purchased from us will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having received a distribution from us with respect to our shares equal to the fair market value of our shares credited to the shareholder’s DRIP account on the date the dividends are reinvested. The amount of the distribution deemed received will be reported on the Form 1099-DIV received by the shareholder.
•A shareholder who participates in the dividend reinvestment feature of the DRIP and whose dividends are reinvested in our shares purchased in the open market, will be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as having received (and will receive a Form 1099-DIV reporting) a distribution from us with respect to its shares equal to the fair market value of our shares credited to the shareholder’s DRIP account (plus any brokerage fees and any other expenses deducted from the amount of the distribution reinvested) on the date the dividends are reinvested.
•A shareholder who participates in the optional cash purchase through the DRIP (or a newly enrolled participant not currently our shareholder making their initial investment in our common shares through the DRIP’s optional cash purchase feature) will not be treated as receiving a distribution from us.
We will pay the annual maintenance cost for each shareholder’s DRIP account. Consistent with the conclusion reached by the IRS in a private letter ruling issued to another REIT, we intend to take the position that the administrative costs do not constitute a distribution which is either taxable to a shareholder or which would reduce the shareholder’s basis in their common shares. However, because the private letter ruling was not issued to us, we have no legal right to rely on its conclusions. Thus, it is possible that the IRS might view the shareholder’s share of the administrative costs as constituting a taxable distribution to them and/or a distribution which reduces the basis in their shares. For this and other reasons, we may in the future take a different position with respect to these costs.
In the situations described above, a shareholder will be treated as receiving a distribution from us even though no cash distribution is actually received. These distributions will be taxable in the same manner as all other distributions paid by us, as described above under “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders,” “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders,” or “—Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders,” as applicable.
Basis and Holding Period in Shares Acquired Pursuant to the DRIP. The tax basis for our shares acquired by reinvesting cash distributions through the DRIP generally will equal the fair market value of our shares on the date of distribution (plus the amount of any brokerage fees paid by the shareholder). The holding period for our shares acquired by reinvesting cash distributions will begin on the day following the date of distribution.
The tax basis in our shares acquired through an optional cash investment generally will equal the cost paid by the participant in acquiring our shares, including any brokerage fees paid by the shareholder. The holding period for our shares purchased through the optional cash investment feature of the DRIP generally will begin on the day our shares are purchased for the participant’s account.
Withdrawal of Shares from the DRIP. When a participant withdraws stock from the DRIP and receives whole shares, the participant will not realize any taxable income. However, if the participant receives cash for a fractional share, the participant will be required to recognize gain or loss with respect to that fractional share.
Effect of Withholding Requirements. Withholding requirements generally applicable to distributions from us will apply to all amounts treated as distributions pursuant to the DRIP. See “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax Applicable to Shareholders—U.S. Shareholders-Generally” and “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax Applicable to Shareholders—Non-U.S. Shareholders—Generally” for discussion of the withholding requirements that apply to other distributions that we pay. All withholding amounts will be withheld from distributions before the distributions are reinvested under the DRIP. Therefore, if a U.S. shareholder is subject to withholding, distributions which would otherwise be available for reinvestment under the DRIP will be reduced by the withholding amount.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax Applicable to Shareholders
U.S. Shareholders—Generally
In general, information-reporting requirements will apply to payments of distributions on our shares and payments of the proceeds of the sale of our shares to some U.S. shareholders, unless an exception applies. Further, the payer will be required to withhold backup withholding tax on such payments if:
(1)the payee fails to furnish a taxpayer identification number (“TIN”) to the payer or to establish an exemption from backup withholding;
(2)the IRS notifies the payer that the TIN furnished by the payee is incorrect;
(3)there has been a notified payee under-reporting with respect to interest, dividends or original issue discount described in Section 3406(c) of the Code; or
(4)there has been a failure of the payee to certify under the penalty of perjury that the payee is not subject to backup withholding under the Code.
Some shareholders may be exempt from backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a shareholder will be allowed as a credit against the shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the shareholder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
U.S. Shareholders—Withholding on Payments in Respect of Certain Foreign Accounts.
As described below, certain future payments made to “foreign financial institutions” and “non-financial foreign entities” may be subject to withholding at a rate of 30%. U.S. shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this withholding provision on their ownership and disposition of our common stock. See “—Non-U.S. Shareholders—Withholding on Payments to Certain Foreign Entities” below.
Non-U.S. Shareholders—Generally
Generally, information reporting will apply to payments or distributions on our shares, and backup withholding described above for a U.S. shareholder will apply, unless the payee certifies that it is not a U.S. person or otherwise establishes an exemption. The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our shares to or through the U.S. office of a U.S. or foreign broker will be subject to information reporting and, possibly, backup withholding as described above for U.S. shareholders, or the withholding tax for non-U.S. shareholders, as applicable, unless the non-U.S. shareholder certifies as to its non-U.S. status or otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that the broker does not have actual knowledge that the shareholder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The proceeds of the disposition by a non-U.S. shareholder of our shares to or through a foreign office of a broker generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, if the broker is a U.S. person, a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from all sources for specified periods is from activities that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, a foreign partnership 50% or more of whose interests are held by partners who are U.S. persons, or a foreign partnership that is engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, then information reporting generally will apply as though the payment was made through a U.S. office of a U.S. or foreign broker unless the broker has documentary evidence as to the non-U.S. shareholder’s foreign status and has no actual knowledge to the contrary.
Applicable Treasury Regulations provide presumptions regarding the status of shareholders when payments to the shareholders cannot be reliably associated with appropriate documentation provided to the payor. If a non-U.S. shareholder fails to comply with the information reporting requirement, payments to such person may be subject to the full withholding tax even if such person might have been eligible for a reduced rate of withholding or no withholding under an applicable income tax treaty. Because the application of these Treasury Regulations varies depending on the non-U.S. shareholder’s particular circumstances, non-U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisor regarding the information reporting requirements applicable to them.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts that we withhold under the backup withholding rules will be refunded or credited against the non-U.S. shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability if certain required information is furnished to the IRS. Non-U.S. shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding application of backup withholding in their particular circumstances and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under current Treasury Regulations.
Non-U.S. Shareholders—Withholding on Payments to Certain Foreign Entities
The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) imposes a 30% withholding tax on certain types of payments made to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other non-U.S. entities unless certain due diligence, reporting, withholding, and certification obligations requirements are satisfied.
As a general matter, FATCA imposes a 30% withholding tax on dividends in respect of our shares if paid to a foreign entity unless either (i) the foreign entity is a “foreign financial institution” that undertakes certain due diligence, reporting, withholding, and certification obligations, or in the case of a foreign financial institution that is a resident in a jurisdiction that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement to implement FATCA, the entity complies with the diligence and reporting requirements of such agreement, (ii) the foreign entity is not a “foreign financial institution” and identifies certain of its U.S. investors, or (iii) the foreign entity otherwise is exempted under FATCA. While withholding under FATCA would have applied to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our shares received after December 31, 2018, proposed Treasury Regulations eliminate FATCA withholding on payments of gross proceeds entirely. Taxpayers may generally rely on these proposed Treasury Regulations until final Treasury Regulations are issued.
If withholding is required under FATCA on a payment related to our shares, investors that otherwise would not be subject to withholding (or that otherwise would be entitled to a reduced rate of withholding) generally will be required to seek a refund or credit from the IRS to obtain the benefit of such exemption or reduction (provided that such benefit is available). Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of FATCA in their particular circumstances.
Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities
The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of certain debt securities that we may offer. This summary assumes the debt securities will be issued with no more than a de minimis amount of original issue discount for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This summary only applies to investors that will hold their debt securities as “capital assets” (within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code) and purchase their debt securities in the initial offering at their offering price. If such debt securities are purchased at a price other than the offering price, the amortizable bond premium or market discount rules may apply which are not described herein. Prospective holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding these possibilities. This section also does not apply to any debt securities treated as “equity,” rather than debt, for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The tax consequences of owning any notes issued with more than de minimis original issue discount, floating rate debt securities, convertible or exchangeable notes, indexed notes or other debt securities not covered by this discussion that we offer will be discussed in the applicable prospectus supplement.
U.S. Holders of Debt Securities
This section summarizes the taxation of U.S. Holders of debt securities that are not tax-exempt organizations. For these purposes, the term “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our debt securities that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
•a citizen or resident of the United States;
•a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of a political subdivision thereof (including the District of Columbia);
•an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
•any trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our debt securities, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding our debt securities should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the partner of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our debt securities by the partnership.
Payments of Interest. Interest on a note will generally be taxable to a U.S. Holder as ordinary interest income at the time it is received or accrued, in accordance with the U.S. Holder’s regular method of tax accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Sale, Exchange, Retirement, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of the Debt Securities. Upon a sale, exchange, retirement, redemption or other taxable disposition of debt securities, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the “amount realized” on the disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such debt securities. The amount realized will include the amount of any cash and the fair market value of any property received for the debt securities (other than any amount attributable to accrued but unpaid interest, which will be taxable as ordinary income (as described above under “—Taxation of Holders of Debt Securities—U.S. Holders of Debt Securities—Payments of Interest”) to the extent not previously included in income). A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a note generally will be equal to the cost of the note to such U.S. Holder decreased by any payments received on the note other than stated interest. Any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the note is more than one year at the time of disposition. For non-corporate U.S. Holders, long-term capital gain generally will be subject to reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses against ordinary income is subject to certain limitations.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Payments of interest on, or the proceeds of the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition (including a retirement or redemption) of, a note are generally subject to information reporting unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient (such as a corporation). Such payments may also be subject to U.S. federal backup withholding unless (1) the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient (such as a corporation), or (2) prior to payment, the U.S. Holder provides a taxpayer identification number and certifies as required on a duly completed and executed IRS Form W-9 (or permitted substitute or successor form), and otherwise complies with the requirements of the backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or credit against that U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Net Investment Income. In certain circumstances, certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates, or trusts are subject to a 3.8% tax on “net investment income,” which includes, among other things, interest income and net gains from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition (including a retirement or redemption) of the debt securities, unless such interest payments or net gains are derived in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or business that consists of certain passive activities or securities or commodities trading activities). Investors in debt securities should consult their own tax advisors regarding the applicability of this tax to their income and gain in respect of their investment in the debt securities.
Tax-Exempt Holders of Debt Securities
In general, a tax-exempt organization is exempt from U.S. federal income tax on its income, except to the extent of its UBTI (as defined above under “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders-Taxation of U.S. Tax-Exempt Shareholders”). Interest income accrued on the debt securities and gain recognized in connection with dispositions of the debt securities generally will not constitute UBTI unless the tax-exempt organization holds the debt securities as debt-financed property (e.g., the tax-exempt organization has incurred “acquisition indebtedness” with respect to such debt securities). Before making an investment in the debt securities, a tax-exempt investor should consult its tax advisors with regard to UBTI and the suitability of the investment in the debt securities.
Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities
The following discussion addresses the rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of Non-U.S. Holders of debt securities.
For purposes of this summary, “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of our debt securities that is not (i) a U.S. Holder (as defined above under “—U.S. Holders of Debt Securities”) or (ii) an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Payments of Interest. Subject to the discussions below concerning backup withholding and FATCA (as defined below), all payments of interest on the debt securities made to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding taxes under the “portfolio interest” exception of the Code, provided that the Non-U.S. Holder:
•does not own, actually or constructively, 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock that are entitled to vote,
•is not a controlled foreign corporation with respect to which we are a “related person” (within the meaning of Section 864(d)(4) of the Code),
•is not a bank whose receipt of interest on a note is described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code, and
•provides its name and address on an IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E (or other applicable form) and certifies, under penalties of perjury, that it is not a U.S. Holder.
The applicable Treasury Regulations provide alternative methods for satisfying the certification requirement described in this section. In addition, under these Treasury Regulations, special rules apply to pass-through entities and this certification requirement may also apply to beneficial owners of pass-through entities. If a Non-U.S. Holder cannot satisfy the requirements described above, payments of interest will generally be subject to the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax, unless the Non-U.S. Holder provides the applicable withholding agent with a properly executed (1) IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E (or other applicable form) claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under an applicable income tax treaty or (2) IRS Form W-8ECI (or other applicable form) stating that interest paid on the debt securities is not subject to U.S. federal withholding tax because it is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States (as discussed below under “—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities—Income Effectively Connected with a U.S. Trade or Business”).
Sale, Exchange, Retirement, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of the Debt Securities. Subject to the discussions below concerning backup withholding and FATCA and except with respect to accrued but unpaid interest, which generally will be taxable as interest and may be subject to the rules described above under “—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities—Payments of Interest,” a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on the receipt of payments of principal on a note, or on any gain recognized upon the sale, exchange, retirement, redemption or other taxable disposition of a note, unless:
•such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business within the United States, in which case such gain will be taxed as described below under “—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities—Income Effectively Connected with a U.S. Trade or Business,” or
•such Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition, and certain other conditions are met, in which case such Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to tax at 30% (or, if applicable, a lower treaty rate) on the gain derived from such disposition, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses.
Income Effectively Connected with a U.S. Trade or Business. If a Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a trade or business in the United States, and if interest on the debt securities or gain realized on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition (including a retirement or redemption) of the debt securities is effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax on such income or gain in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. Holder. If the Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty between the United States and the Non-U.S. Holder’s country of residence, any “effectively connected” income or gain generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax only if it is also attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States. In addition, if such a Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign corporation, such holder may also be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% (or such lower rate provided by an applicable income tax treaty) of its effectively connected earnings and profits, subject to certain adjustments. Payments of interest that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business will not be subject to the 30% U.S. federal withholding tax provided that the Non-U.S. Holder claims exemption from withholding. To claim exemption from withholding, the Non-U.S. Holder must certify its qualification, which generally can be done by providing the applicable withholding agent with a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or other
applicable form).
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. Generally, we must report annually to the IRS and to Non-U.S. Holders the amount of interest paid to Non-U.S. Holders and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect to those payments. Copies of these information returns reporting such interest and withholding may also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which the Non-U.S. Holder resides. In general, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to backup withholding or additional information reporting requirements with respect to payments of interest that we make, provided that the statement described above in last bullet point under “—Non-U.S. Holders of Debt Securities—Interest” has been received and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a U.S. person, as defined under the Code, that is not an exempt recipient. In addition, proceeds from a sale or other disposition of a note by a Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding with respect to payments of the proceeds of the sale or disposition (including a retirement or redemption) of a note within the United States or conducted through certain U.S. or U.S.-related financial intermediaries, unless the statement described above has been received and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a U.S. person. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability if the required information is furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.
Additional Withholding Requirements. As discussed above under “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax Applicable to Shareholders—Non-U.S. Shareholders—Withholding on Payments to Certain Foreign Entities,” FATCA imposes a 30% withholding tax on certain types of payments made to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other non-U.S. entities unless certain due diligence, reporting, withholding, and certification obligations requirements are satisfied.
As a general matter, payments to Non-U.S. Holders that are foreign entities (whether as beneficial owner or intermediary) of interest on a debt obligation of a U.S. issuer will be subject to a withholding tax (separate and apart from, but without duplication of, the withholding tax described above) at a rate of 30%, unless various U.S. information reporting and due diligence requirements (generally relating to ownership by U.S. persons of interests in or accounts with those entities) have been satisfied. While withholding under FATCA would have applied to payments of gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, a debt obligation of a U.S. issuer received after December 31, 2018, proposed Treasury Regulations eliminate FATCA withholding on payments of gross proceeds entirely. Taxpayers may generally rely on these proposed Treasury Regulations until final Treasury Regulations are issued.
If withholding is required under FATCA on a payment related to the debt securities, Non-U.S. Holders that otherwise would not be subject to withholding (or that otherwise would be entitled to a reduced rate of withholding) generally will be required to seek a refund or credit from the IRS to obtain the benefit of such exemption or reduction (provided that such benefit is available). Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of FATCA in their particular circumstances.
Other Tax Considerations
State, Local and Foreign Taxes
We may be required to pay tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business, and our shareholders may be required to pay tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which they reside. Our state and local tax treatment may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed above. In addition, a shareholder’s state and local tax treatment may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, prospective investors should consult with their tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in our shares and depositary shares.
A portion of our income is earned through our taxable REIT subsidiary. A taxable REIT subsidiary is generally subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax at the full applicable corporate rates. In addition, a taxable REIT subsidiary will be limited in its ability to deduct interest payments in excess of a certain amount made directly or indirectly to us. To the extent that we and/or our taxable REIT subsidiary is required to pay U.S. federal, state or local taxes, we will have less cash available for distribution to shareholders.
Tax Shelter Reporting
If a holder recognizes a loss as a result of a transaction with respect to our shares of at least (i) for a holder that is an individual, S corporation, trust or a partnership with at least one non-corporate partner, $2 million or more in a single taxable year or $4 million or more in a combination of taxable years, or (ii) for a holder that is either a corporation or a partnership with only
corporate partners, $10 million or more in a single taxable year or $20 million or more in a combination of taxable years, such holder may be required to file a disclosure statement with the IRS on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases exempt from this reporting requirement, but shareholders of a REIT currently are not excepted. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.
Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs
The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. We cannot give you any assurances as to whether, or in what form, any proposals affecting REITs or their shareholders will be enacted. Changes to the U.S. federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our shares. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of potential changes to the U.S. federal tax laws and on an investment in our shares.
ITEM 9C: DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III ishas been omitted from thispursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K in that we10-K. We will file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A with respect to our 20182024 Annual Meeting (the “Proxy Statement”) no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and certain information included therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those sections of the Proxy Statement which specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference. In addition, we have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our trustees, officers and employees, which can be reviewed and printed from our website www.washreit.com.www.elmecommunities.com. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered part of this document.
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to theour Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to theour Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required underby this Item by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is hereby incorporated herein by reference to theour Proxy Statement.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
| | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
| — |
| | $ | — |
| | 2,053,209 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
|
Total | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 2,053,209 |
|
(1) See note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of the equity compensation plans.
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to theour Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to theour Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 15: EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(A). The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
| | | | | | | | |
| 1 | Financial Statements | Page |
| | |
| 1.Financial Statements | Page |
| | |
| Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42) | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 | |
| Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| | |
2.2 | Financial Statement Schedules | |
| | |
| Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | |
| Schedule III – Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation | |
| All other schedules are omitted because they are either not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. | |
| | |
3.3 | Exhibits:
Exhibits: | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit Description | Form | | File
Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed
Herewith |
| 3.1 | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 3.1 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 3.2 | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 3.1 | | 9/20/2023 | | |
| 4.1 | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | (c) | | 8/13/1996 | | |
| 4.2 | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 99.1 | | 2/25/1998 | | |
| 4.3 | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.1 | | 7/5/2007 | | |
| 4.4 | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.4 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.1* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.2* | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10(nn) | | 7/27/2009 | | |
| 10.3* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.3 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.4* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.37 | | 2/27/2013 | | |
| 10.5* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.45 | | 5/9/2013 | | |
| 10.6* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.45 | | 3/3/2014 | | |
| 10.7* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.61 | | 11/4/2015 | | |
| 10.9* | | DEF 14A | | 001-06622 | | Annex A | | 3/23/2016 | | |
| 10.10* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.50 | | 8/5/2014 | | |
| 10.11* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.60 | | 11/4/2015 | | |
| 10.12* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 4/30/2018 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File
Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed
Herewith |
| 3.1 | | | | DEF 14A | | 001-06622 | | B | | 4/1/2011 | | |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 3.1 | | 6/7/2017 | | |
| 3.3 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 3.1 | | 2/14/2017 | | |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | (c) | | 8/13/1996 | | |
| 4.2 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 99.1 | | 2/25/1998 | | |
| 4.3 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.1 | | 7/5/2007 | | |
| 4.4 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.1 | | 9/30/2010 | | |
| 4.5 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.2 | | 9/30/2010 | | |
| 4.6 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.1 | | 9/17/2012 | | |
| 4.7 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 4.2 | | 9/17/2012 | | |
| 10.1* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10(j) | | 11/14/2002 | | |
| 10.2* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10(k) | | 11/14/2002 | | |
| 10.3* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10(p) | | 3/16/2006 | | |
| 10.4* | | | | DEF 14A | | 001-06622 | | B | | 4/9/2007 | | |
| 10.5* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10(gg) | | 2/29/2008 | | |
| 10.6* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10(hh) | | 2/29/2008 | | |
| 10.7* | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10(nn) | | 7/27/2009 | | |
| 10.8* | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.31 | | 11/2/2010 | | |
| 10.9* | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.32 | | 11/2/2010 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit
Number | Exhibit Description | Form | | File
Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed
Herewith |
| 10.13* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.45 | | 2/19/2020 | | |
| 10.14* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.46 | | 2/19/2020 | | |
| 10.15* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 10/30/2020 | | |
| 10.16* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 11/1/2013 | | |
| 10.17* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.44 | | 3/3/2014 | | |
| 10.18* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.18 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.19* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 10/30/2014 | | |
| 10.20* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.55 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.21* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.56 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.22* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 4/28/2022 | | |
| 10.23* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.18 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.24* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.27 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.25* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.28 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.26* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.29 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.27* | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.3 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.28 | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.2 | | 10/29/2021 | | |
| 10.29 | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.33 | | 2/17/2023 | | |
| 10.30* | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 8/1/2023 | | |
| 21 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 23 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 24 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.1 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.3 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 32 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 97 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101 | INS-XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | | X |
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and contained in Exhibit 101) | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File
Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed
Herewith |
| 10.10* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.34 | | 5/6/2011 | | |
| 10.11* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.35 | | 5/6/2011 | | |
| 10.12* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.38 | | 5/7/2012 | | |
| 10.13* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.37 | | 2/27/2013 | | |
| 10.14* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.41 | | 2/27/2013 | | |
| 10.15* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.45 | | 5/9/2013 | | |
| 10.16* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.46 | | 5/9/2013 | | |
| 10.17* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.47 | | 5/9/2013 | | |
| 10.18 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.51 | | 10/3/2013 | | |
| 10.19 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.52 | | 10/3/2013 | | |
| 10.20 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.53 | | 11/1/2013 | | |
| 10.21* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 11/1/2013 | | |
| 10.22* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.44 | | 3/3/2014 | | |
| 10.23* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.45 | | 3/3/2014 | | |
| 10.24* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.46 | | 3/3/2014 | | |
| 10.25* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.47 | | 5/7/2014 | | |
| 10.26* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.48 | | 5/7/2014 | | |
| 10.27* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.50 | | 8/5/2014 | | |
| 10.28* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.51 | | 8/5/2014 | | |
| 10.29* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 10/30/2014 | | |
| 10.30* | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 2/19/2015 | | |
| 10.31* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.52 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.32* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.53 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.33* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.34* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.55 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.35* | | | | 10-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.56 | | 3/2/2015 | | |
| 10.36* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.57 | | 5/5/2015 | | |
| 10.37* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.58 | | 5/5/2015 | | |
| 10.38 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2015, by and among Washington REIT, as borrower, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, with Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, KeyBank National Association, as syndication agent, and Royal Bank of Canada and SunTrust Bank, as documentation agents | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 6/23/2015 | | |
| 10.39* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.60 | | 11/4/2015 | | |
| 10.40* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.61 | | 11/4/2015 | | |
| 10.41 | | | | 8-K | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 9/16/2015 | | |
| 10.42 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.49 | | 8/1/2016 | | |
| 10.43 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.50 | | 8/1/2016 | | |
| 10.44 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.51 | | 8/1/2016 | | |
| 10.45 | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.52 | | 8/1/2016 | | |
| 10.46* | | | | DEF 14A | | | | Annex A | | 3/23/2016 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
Exhibit
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | File
Number | | Exhibit | | Filing Date | | Filed
Herewith |
| 10.47 | | Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2016, by and among Washington Real Estate Investment Trust, as borrower, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders, and Capital One, National Association, as administrative agent, with Capital One, National Association, and U.S. Bank National Association as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, and U.S. Bank National Association as syndication agent | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.54 | | 11/2/2016 | | |
| 10.48* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.55 | | 11/2/2016 | | |
| 10.49* | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.50* | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.51* | | | | 10-Q | | 001-06622 | | 10.1 | | 7/31/2017 | | |
| 10.52 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 12 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 21 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 23 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 24 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.1 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.3 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 32 | | | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 101 | | The following materials from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language ("XBRL"): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) notes to these consolidated financial statements. | | | | | | | | | | X |
* Management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which trustees or executive officers are eligible to participate.
In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, copies of certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Washington REITElme Communities or its subsidiaries are not filed herewith. Pursuant to this regulation, we hereby agree to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
ITEM 16: FORM 10-K SUMMARY
We have chosen not to include a Form 10-K Summary.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ELME COMMUNITIES
Date: February 20, 201816, 2024
By: /s/ Paul T. McDermott
Paul T. McDermott
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Charles T. Nason* | | Chairman, Trustee | | February 20, 2018 |
Charles T. Nason | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Paul T. McDermott | | President,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Trustee | | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| Paul T. McDermott | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Benjamin S. Butcher* | | Lead Independent Trustee | | Trustee | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| Benjamin S. Butcher | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jennifer S. Banner* | | Trustee | | February 16, 2024 |
| Jennifer S. Banner | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Susan B. Carras* | | Trustee | | February 16, 2024 |
/s/ William G. Byrnes*Susan B. Carras | | | Trustee | | February 20, 2018
| William G. Byrnes | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Edward S. Civera* | | Trustee | | February 20, 2018 |
Edward S. Civera | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Ellen M. Goitia* | | Trustee | | Trustee | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| Ellen M. Goitia | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Thomas H. Nolan, Jr.* | | Trustee | | Trustee | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| Thomas H. Nolan, Jr. | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Anthony L. Winns* | | Trustee | | Trustee | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| Anthony L. Winns | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Stephen E. RiffeeSteven M. Freishtat | | Executive Vice President and | | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
Stephen E . RiffeeSteven M. Freishtat | | Chief Financial Officer | | |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ W. Drew Hammond | | Senior Vice President, Chief AccountingAdministrative Officer and Treasurer | | February 20, 201816, 2024 |
| W. Drew Hammond | | Treasurer | | |
| | (Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | |
* By: /s/ W. Drew Hammond through power of attorney
W. Drew Hammond
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”)Elme Communities is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ internal control system over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions.
In connection with the preparation of Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the 2013 COSO Framework). Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2017, Washington REIT’s2023, Elme Communities’ internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ consolidated financial statements included in this report, has issued an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Washington REIT’sElme Communities’ internal control over financial reporting, a copy of which appears on page 5985 of this annual report.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Trustees of Elme Communities
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Washington Real Estate Investment TrustElme Communities and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)15(A)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 20, 201816, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
| | | | | | | | |
| Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate
| |
| Description of the Matter | During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company acquired one real estate property for an aggregate purchase price of $108.0 million as disclosed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. This transaction was accounted for as asset acquisition.
Auditing the Company's accounting for this acquisition involves a higher degree of auditor judgment due to management’s use of estimates in determining the relative fair values of the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired. The significant assumptions used to estimate the values of the tangible and intangible assets included the replacement cost of the acquired real estate assets, estimated future cash flows and other valuation assumptions, which are based on internal analyses and other market data.
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process for estimating the relative fair value of acquired assets and allocating purchase price to the various components, including controls over management’s determination and review of the significant assumptions used in the analyses described above.
To test the relative fair values of acquired tangible and intangible assets used in the purchase price allocation, we involved our valuation specialists and performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the Company’s valuation methodologies, testing the significant assumptions described above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data. For example, we compared the significant assumptions used and the Company’s estimated relative fair values of acquired assets to observable market data, including other properties within the same submarkets.
| |
| Impairment of Watergate 600 | |
| Description of the Matter | During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $41.9 million on its single office property, Watergate 600, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses real estate assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is recognized when indicators of impairment are present and the future undiscounted cash flows for a real estate asset are less than its carrying amount, at which time the real estate asset is written down to its estimated fair value, should the carrying value exceed the fair value.
Auditing the Company’s accounting for impairment of Watergate 600 was complex and involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s assessment of recoverability and the resulting measurement of impairment when the asset is not deemed recoverable. Management’s use of assumptions and estimates is inherent in the determination of estimated future cash flows expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition and the estimated fair value of the property. In particular, management’s assumptions and estimates included estimated future revenue and expenses and capitalization rates, which were sensitive to expectations about market or economic conditions.
| |
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s real estate asset impairment assessment process. For example, we tested controls over management’s process and assumptions for assessing recoverability and evaluating the assumptions used to determine fair value when the asset’s carrying value is deemed not recoverable.
To test the Company's accounting for impairment of Watergate 600, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the methodologies applied and testing the significant assumptions discussed above in the recoverability assessment and valuation analysis. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in performing these procedures. For example, we evaluated the significant assumptions used to estimate future cash flows for reasonableness by comparing them to the Company’s historical accounting records or to available market data. We held discussions with management about judgments used to understand the probability of future leasing events that could affect cash flow assumptions for the property.
| |
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
Tysons, Virginia
February 20, 201816, 2024
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Trustees of Elme Communities
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
Opinion on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting
We have audited Washington Real Estate Investment TrustElme Communities and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Washington Real Estate Investment TrustElme Communities and Subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 20172023 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 20, 201816, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tysons, Virginia
February 20, 2018
16, 2024
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 |
| Assets | | | |
| Land | $ | 384,097 | | | $ | 373,171 | |
| Income producing property | 1,960,020 | | | 1,897,835 | |
| 2,344,117 | | | 2,271,006 | |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (528,024) | | | (481,588) | |
| Net income producing property | 1,816,093 | | | 1,789,418 | |
| Properties under development or held for future development | 30,980 | | | 31,260 | |
| Total real estate held for investment, net | 1,847,073 | | | 1,820,678 | |
| | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 5,984 | | | 8,389 | |
| Restricted cash | 2,554 | | | 1,463 | |
| Rents and other receivables | 17,642 | | | 16,346 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 26,775 | | | 25,730 | |
| | | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,900,028 | | | $ | 1,872,606 | |
| Liabilities | | | |
| Notes payable, net | $ | 522,345 | | | $ | 497,359 | |
| | | |
| Line of credit | 157,000 | | | 55,000 | |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 38,997 | | | 34,386 | |
| Dividend payable | 15,863 | | | 14,934 | |
| Advance rents | 5,248 | | | 1,578 | |
| Tenant security deposits | 6,225 | | | 5,563 | |
| | | |
| Total liabilities | 745,678 | | | 608,820 | |
| Equity | | | |
| Shareholders’ equity | | | |
| Preferred shares; $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — | | | — | |
| Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized: 87,867 and 87,534 shares issued and outstanding, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively | 879 | | | 875 | |
| Additional paid in capital | 1,735,530 | | | 1,729,854 | |
| Distributions in excess of net income | (569,391) | | | (453,008) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (12,958) | | | (14,233) | |
| Total shareholders’ equity | 1,154,060 | | | 1,263,488 | |
| Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 290 | | | 298 | |
| Total equity | 1,154,350 | | | 1,263,786 | |
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,900,028 | | | $ | 1,872,606 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Assets | | | |
| Land | $ | 588,025 |
| | $ | 573,315 |
|
| Income producing property | 2,113,977 |
| | 2,112,088 |
|
| | 2,702,002 |
| | 2,685,403 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (683,692 | ) | | (657,425 | ) |
| Net income producing property | 2,018,310 |
| | 2,027,978 |
|
| Properties under development or held for future development | 54,422 |
| | 40,232 |
|
| Total real estate held for investment, net | 2,072,732 |
| | 2,068,210 |
|
| Investment in real estate sold or held for sale, net | 68,534 |
| | — |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 9,847 |
| | 11,305 |
|
| Restricted cash | 2,776 |
| | 6,317 |
|
| Rents and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,426 and $2,377, respectively | 69,766 |
| | 64,319 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 125,087 |
| | 103,468 |
|
| Other assets related to properties sold or held for sale | 10,684 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets | $ | 2,359,426 |
| | $ | 2,253,619 |
|
| Liabilities | | | |
| Notes payable, net | $ | 894,358 |
| | $ | 843,084 |
|
| Mortgage notes payable, net | 95,141 |
| | 148,540 |
|
| Lines of credit | 166,000 |
| | 120,000 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 61,565 |
| | 46,967 |
|
| Dividend payable | 23,581 |
| | 22,414 |
|
| Advance rents | 12,487 |
| | 11,750 |
|
| Tenant security deposits | 9,149 |
| | 8,802 |
|
| Other liabilities related to properties sold or held for sale | 1,809 |
| | — |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,264,090 |
| | 1,201,557 |
|
| Equity | | | |
| Shareholders’ equity | | | |
| Preferred shares; $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized: 78,510 and 74,606 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively | 785 |
| | 746 |
|
| Additional paid in capital | 1,483,980 |
| | 1,368,636 |
|
| Distributions in excess of net income | (399,213 | ) | | (326,047 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 9,419 |
| | 7,611 |
|
| Total shareholders’ equity | 1,094,971 |
| | 1,050,946 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests in subsidiary | 365 |
| | 1,116 |
|
| Total equity | 1,095,336 |
| | 1,052,062 |
|
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,359,426 |
| | $ | 2,253,619 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Revenue | | | | | |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 325,078 |
| | $ | 313,264 |
| | $ | 306,427 |
|
| Expenses | | | | | |
| Real estate expenses | 115,650 |
| | 115,013 |
| | 112,234 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 112,056 |
| | 108,406 |
| | 108,935 |
|
| Acquisition costs | — |
| | 1,178 |
| | 2,056 |
|
| Real estate impairment and casualty (gain), net | 33,152 |
| | (676 | ) | | 5,909 |
|
| General and administrative | 22,580 |
| | 19,545 |
| | 20,123 |
|
| | 283,438 |
| | 243,466 |
| | 249,257 |
|
| Other operating income | | | | | |
| Gain on sale of real estate | 24,915 |
| | 101,704 |
| | 91,107 |
|
| Real estate operating income | 66,555 |
| | 171,502 |
| | 148,277 |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | |
| Interest expense | (47,534 | ) | | (53,126 | ) | | (59,546 | ) |
| Other income | 507 |
| | 297 |
| | 709 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | — |
| | (119 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 84 |
| | 615 |
| | (134 | ) |
| | (46,943 | ) | | (52,214 | ) | | (59,090 | ) |
| Net income | 19,612 |
| | 119,288 |
| | 89,187 |
|
| Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 56 |
| | 51 |
| | 553 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 19,668 |
| | $ | 119,339 |
| | $ | 89,740 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Basic net income attributable to the controlling interests per share | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Diluted net income attributable to the controlling interests per share | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 76,820 |
| | 72,163 |
| | 68,177 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 76,935 |
| | 72,339 |
| | 68,310 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Revenue | | | | | |
Real estate rental revenue | $ | 227,911 | | | $ | 209,380 | | | $ | 169,151 | |
| Expenses | | | | | |
| Property operating and maintenance | 50,985 | | | 47,384 | | | 38,573 | |
| Real estate taxes and insurance | 28,845 | | | 26,617 | | | 22,209 | |
| Property management | 8,108 | | | 7,436 | | | 6,133 | |
| General and administrative | 25,887 | | | 28,258 | | | 27,538 | |
| Transformation costs | 6,339 | | | 9,686 | | | 6,635 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 88,950 | | | 91,722 | | | 72,656 | |
| Real estate impairment | 41,860 | | | — | | | — | |
| 250,974 | | | 211,103 | | | 173,744 | |
| | | | | |
| Real estate operating loss | (23,063) | | | (1,723) | | | (4,593) | |
| Other income (expense) | | | | | |
| Interest expense | (30,429) | | | (24,940) | | | (34,063) | |
| Loss on interest rate derivatives | — | | | — | | | (5,866) | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | (54) | | | (4,917) | | | (12,727) | |
| Other income | 569 | | | 712 | | | 4,109 | |
| | | | | |
| (29,914) | | | (29,145) | | | (48,547) | |
| Loss from continuing operations | (52,977) | | | (30,868) | | | (53,140) | |
| Discontinued operations: | | | | | |
| Income from operations of properties sold or held for sale | — | | | — | | | 23,083 | |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net | — | | | — | | | 46,441 | |
| | | | | |
| Income from discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | 69,524 | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | 16,384 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Basic net (loss) income per share | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (0.63) | |
| Discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | 0.82 | |
Basic net (loss) income per share (1) | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | 0.19 | |
| Diluted net (loss) income per share | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (0.63) | |
| Discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | 0.82 | |
Diluted net (loss) income per share (1) | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | 0.19 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 87,735 | | | 87,388 | | | 84,544 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 87,735 | | | 87,388 | | | 84,544 | |
(1) Earnings per share may not sum due to rounding
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | 16,384 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
| Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate derivatives | (764) | | | 2,819 | | | 3,673 | |
| Reclassification of unrealized loss on interest rate derivatives to earnings | 2,039 | | | 2,039 | | | 7,799 | |
| Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (51,702) | | | $ | (26,010) | | | $ | 27,856 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedges | 1,808 |
| | 8,161 |
| | (550 | ) |
| Comprehensive income | 21,420 |
| | 127,449 |
| | 88,637 |
|
| Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 56 |
| | 51 |
| | 553 |
|
| Comprehensive income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 21,476 |
| | $ | 127,500 |
| | $ | 89,190 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Shares of
Beneficial
Interest at
Par Value | | Additional
Paid in
Capital | | Distributions in Excess
of Net Income | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | Total
Shareholders’
Equity | | Non- controlling
Interests in
Subsidiary | | Total
Equity |
| Balance, December 31, 2020 | 84,409 | | | 844 | | | 1,649,366 | | | (298,860) | | | (30,563) | | | 1,320,787 | | | 322 | | | 1,321,109 | |
| Net income | — | | | — | | | — | | | 16,384 | | | — | | | 16,384 | | | — | | | 16,384 | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,673 | | | 3,673 | | | — | | | 3,673 | |
| Loss on interest rate derivatives | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,760 | | | 5,760 | | | — | | | 5,760 | |
| Amortization of swap settlements | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,039 | | | 2,039 | | | — | | | 2,039 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (15) | | | (15) | |
| Dividends ($0.94 per common share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (80,018) | | | — | | | (80,018) | | | — | | | (80,018) | |
| Equity offerings, net of issuance costs | 1,636 | | | 17 | | | 40,445 | | | — | | | — | | | 40,462 | | | — | | | 40,462 | |
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program | 75 | | | — | | | 1,744 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,744 | | | — | | | 1,744 | |
| Share grants, net of forfeitures and tax withholdings | 141 | | | 2 | | | 5,922 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,924 | | | — | | | 5,924 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2021 | 86,261 | | | 863 | | | 1,697,477 | | | (362,494) | | | (19,091) | | | 1,316,755 | | | 307 | | | 1,317,062 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (30,868) | | | — | | | (30,868) | | | — | | | (30,868) | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,819 | | | 2,819 | | | — | | | 2,819 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of swap settlements | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,039 | | | 2,039 | | | — | | | 2,039 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9) | | | (9) | |
| Dividends ($0.68 per common share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (59,646) | | | — | | | (59,646) | | | — | | | (59,646) | |
| Equity offerings, net of issuance costs | 1,032 | | | 10 | | | 26,839 | | | — | | | — | | | 26,849 | | | — | | | 26,849 | |
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program | 47 | | | — | | | 1,030 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,030 | | | — | | | 1,030 | |
| Share grants, net of forfeitures and tax withholdings | 194 | | | 2 | | | 4,508 | | | — | | | — | | | 4,510 | | | — | | | 4,510 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | 87,534 | | | 875 | | | 1,729,854 | | | (453,008) | | | (14,233) | | | 1,263,488 | | | 298 | | | 1,263,786 | |
| Net loss | — | | | — | | | — | | | (52,977) | | | — | | | (52,977) | | | — | | | (52,977) | |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (764) | | | (764) | | | — | | | (764) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of swap settlements | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,039 | | | 2,039 | | | — | | | 2,039 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | (8) | |
| Dividends ($0.72 per common share) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (63,406) | | | — | | | (63,406) | | | — | | | (63,406) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program | 28 | | | — | | | 497 | | | — | | | — | | | 497 | | | — | | | 497 | |
| Share grants, net of forfeitures and tax withholdings | 305 | | | 4 | | | 5,179 | | | — | | | — | | | 5,183 | | | — | | | 5,183 | |
| Balance, December 31, 2023 | 87,867 | | | $ | 879 | | | $ | 1,735,530 | | | $ | (569,391) | | | $ | (12,958) | | | $ | 1,154,060 | | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 1,154,350 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Shares of Beneficial Interest at Par Value | | Additional Paid in Capital | | Distributions in Excess of Net Income | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total Shareholders’ Equity | | Non- controlling Interests in Subsidiaries | | Total Equity |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | 67,819 |
| | $ | 678 |
| | $ | 1,184,395 |
| | $ | (365,518 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 819,555 |
| | $ | 2,674 |
| | $ | 822,229 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 89,740 |
| | — |
| | 89,740 |
| | — |
| | 89,740 |
|
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and deconsolidation of noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,316 | ) | | (1,316 | ) |
| Unrealized loss on interest rate hedges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (550 | ) | | (550 | ) | | — |
| | (550 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
|
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (82,003 | ) | | — |
| | (82,003 | ) | |
|
| | (82,003 | ) |
| Equity offerings, net of issuance costs | 184 |
| | 2 |
| | 5,213 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,215 |
| | — |
| | 5,215 |
|
| Share grants, net of share grant amortization and forfeitures | 188 |
| | 2 |
| | 3,690 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,692 |
| | — |
| | 3,692 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | 68,191 |
| | 682 |
| | 1,193,298 |
| | (357,781 | ) | | (550 | ) | | 835,649 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 837,012 |
|
| Adjustment for retrospective application of new accounting principle (see note 2) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35 | ) | | | | (35 | ) | | | | (35 | ) |
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 119,339 |
| | — |
| | 119,339 |
| | — |
| | 119,339 |
|
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (51 | ) | | (51 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,161 |
| | 8,161 |
| | — |
| | 8,161 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (196 | ) | | (196 | ) |
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (87,570 | ) | | — |
| | (87,570 | ) | | — |
| | (87,570 | ) |
| Equity offerings, net of issuance costs | 6,223 |
| | 62 |
| | 172,874 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 172,936 |
| | — |
| | 172,936 |
|
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program | 23 |
| | — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 700 |
| | — |
| | 700 |
|
| Share grants, net of share grant amortization and forfeitures | 169 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,764 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,766 |
| | — |
| | 1,766 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | 74,606 |
| | 746 |
| | 1,368,636 |
| | (326,047 | ) | | 7,611 |
| | 1,050,946 |
| | 1,116 |
| | 1,052,062 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19,668 |
| | — |
| | 19,668 |
| | — |
| | 19,668 |
|
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (56 | ) | | (56 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on interest rate hedges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,808 |
| | 1,808 |
| | — |
| | 1,808 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | (3,128 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,128 | ) | | (1,071 | ) | | (4,199 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 376 |
| | 376 |
|
| Dividends | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (92,834 | ) | | — |
| | (92,834 | ) | | — |
| | (92,834 | ) |
| Equity offerings, net of issuance costs | 3,587 |
| | 36 |
| | 113,158 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 113,194 |
| | — |
| | 113,194 |
|
| Shares issued under Dividend Reinvestment Program | 80 |
| | 1 |
| | 2,575 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,576 |
| | — |
| | 2,576 |
|
| Share grants, net of share grant amortization, forfeitures and tax withholdings | 237 |
| | 2 |
| | 2,739 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,741 |
| | — |
| | 2,741 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2017 | 78,510 |
| | $ | 785 |
| | $ | 1,483,980 |
| | $ | (399,213 | ) | | $ | 9,419 |
| | $ | 1,094,971 |
| | $ | 365 |
| | $ | 1,095,336 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES |
| | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (IN THOUSANDS) |
| | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | 16,384 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 88,950 | | | 91,722 | | | 95,560 | |
| Credit losses on lease related receivables | 4,833 | | | 2,483 | | | 2,482 | |
| Real estate impairment | 41,860 | | | — | | | — | |
| Gain on sale of real estate | — | | | — | | | (46,441) | |
| Share-based compensation expense | 5,538 | | | 7,988 | | | 8,553 | |
| Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and related financing costs | 4,218 | | | 4,052 | | | 4,325 | |
| Loss on interest rate derivatives | — | | | — | | | 5,866 | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | 54 | | | 4,917 | | | 12,727 | |
| Changes in other assets | (11,294) | | | (1,602) | | | (4,681) | |
| Changes in other liabilities | 3,487 | | | (5,481) | | | (5,619) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 84,669 | | | 73,211 | | | 89,156 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
| Real estate acquisitions, net | (107,595) | | | (204,433) | | | (153,748) | |
| Net cash received from sale of real estate | — | | | — | | | 897,783 | |
| Capital improvements to real estate | (38,218) | | | (36,513) | | | (32,410) | |
| Development in progress | — | | | (698) | | | (8,406) | |
| Non-real estate capital improvements | (408) | | | (1,743) | | | (49) | |
| Insurance proceeds | — | | | 2,224 | | | — | |
| Real estate deposits | — | | | — | | | (1,000) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (146,221) | | | (241,163) | | | 702,170 | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
| Line of credit borrowings (repayments), net | 102,000 | | | 55,000 | | | (42,000) | |
| Dividends paid | (64,335) | | | (59,363) | | | (90,728) | |
| Principal payments – mortgage notes payable | — | | | (76,598) | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Repayments of notes payable | — | | | — | | | (311,894) | |
| Repayments of unsecured term loan debt | (100,000) | | | — | | | (150,000) | |
| Proceeds from term loan | 125,000 | | | — | | | — | |
| Settlement of interest rate derivatives | — | | | — | | | (5,866) | |
| Payment of financing costs | (844) | | | (39) | | | (4,858) | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (8) | | | (9) | | | (15) | |
| Proceeds from dividend reinvestment program | 497 | | | 1,030 | | | 1,744 | |
| Net proceeds from equity issuances | — | | | 26,849 | | | 40,462 | |
| Payment of tax withholdings for restricted share awards | (2,072) | | | (3,286) | | | (2,241) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 60,238 | | | (56,416) | | | (565,396) | |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (1,314) | | | (224,368) | | | 225,930 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 9,852 | | | 234,220 | | | 8,290 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year | $ | 8,538 | | | $ | 9,852 | | | $ | 234,220 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES |
| | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (IN THOUSANDS) |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | (as adjusted) | | (as adjusted) |
| Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Gain on sale of real estate | (24,915 | ) | | (101,704 | ) | | (91,107 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | 112,056 |
| | 108,406 |
| | 108,935 |
|
| Provision for losses on accounts receivable | 882 |
| | 1,706 |
| | 1,368 |
|
| Deferred tax benefit | (84 | ) | | (698 | ) | | — |
|
| Real estate impairment and casualty (gain), net | 33,152 |
| | (676 | ) | | 5,909 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | 4,771 |
| | 3,491 |
| | 5,112 |
|
| Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and related financing costs | 1,897 |
| | 3,187 |
| | 3,486 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt, net | — |
| | — |
| | 119 |
|
| Changes in other assets | (20,199 | ) | | (15,713 | ) | | (10,496 | ) |
| Changes in other liabilities | 3,454 |
| | (2,562 | ) | | (3,195 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 130,626 |
| | 114,725 |
| | 109,318 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
| Real estate acquisitions, net | (138,371 | ) | | (227,413 | ) | | (151,917 | ) |
| Capital improvements to real estate | (60,515 | ) | | (57,094 | ) | | (41,507 | ) |
| Development in progress | (18,150 | ) | | (22,572 | ) | | (31,203 | ) |
| Net cash received from sale of real estate | 30,798 |
| | 243,624 |
| | 136,930 |
|
| Real estate deposits, net | (6,250 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Insurance proceeds | — |
| | 883 |
| | — |
|
| Non-real estate capital improvements | (3,866 | ) | | (920 | ) | | (2,129 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (196,354 | ) | | (63,492 | ) | | (89,826 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
| Line of credit borrowings, net | 46,000 |
| | 15,000 |
| | 55,000 |
|
| Principal payments – mortgage notes payable | (52,571 | ) | | (270,061 | ) | | (4,512 | ) |
| Borrowing under construction loan | — |
| | — |
| | 4,558 |
|
| Notes payable repayments | — |
| | — |
| | (150,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from dividend reinvestment program | 2,576 |
| | 700 |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from term loan | 50,000 |
| | 100,000 |
| | 150,000 |
|
| Payment of financing costs | (319 | ) | | (1,590 | ) | | (5,095 | ) |
| Dividends paid | (91,666 | ) | | (85,648 | ) | | (61,510 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (4,199 | ) | | (196 | ) | | — |
|
| Net proceeds from equity offerings | 113,194 |
| | 172,936 |
| | 5,215 |
|
| Payment of tax withholdings for restricted share awards | (2,286 | ) | | (1,960 | ) | | (2,071 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 60,729 |
| | (70,819 | ) | | (8,410 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (4,999 | ) | | (19,586 | ) | | 11,082 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 17,622 |
| | 37,208 |
| | 26,126 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year | $ | 12,623 |
| | $ | 17,622 |
| | $ | 37,208 |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES |
| | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (IN THOUSANDS) |
| | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | |
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest expense | $ | 23,502 | | | $ | 20,842 | | | $ | 27,166 | |
| Change in accrued capital improvements and development costs | 9,556 | | | 609 | | | (6,949) | |
| Dividend payable | 15,863 | | | 14,934 | | | 14,650 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash: | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,984 | | | $ | 8,389 | | | $ | 233,600 | |
| Restricted cash | 2,554 | | | 1,463 | | | 620 | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 8,538 | | | $ | 9,852 | | | $ | 234,220 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES |
| | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
| (IN THOUSANDS) |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | (as adjusted) | | (as adjusted) |
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest expense | $ | 45,730 |
| | $ | 51,054 |
| | $ | 57,179 |
|
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 261 |
|
| Change in accrued capital improvements and development costs | $ | 3,264 |
| | $ | (3,788 | ) | | $ | (4,229 | ) |
| Dividends payable | $ | 23,581 |
| | $ | 22,414 |
| | $ | 20,434 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash: | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 9,847 |
| | $ | 11,305 |
| | $ | 23,825 |
|
| Restricted cash | 2,776 |
| | 6,317 |
| | 13,383 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 12,623 |
| | $ | 17,622 |
| | $ | 37,208 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 AND 20152021
NOTE 1: NATURE OF BUSINESS
Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (“Washington REIT”),Elme Communities, a Maryland real estate investment trust, formerly known as Washington Real Estate Investment Trust, is a self-administered equity real estate investment trust, successor to a trust organized in 1960. Our business primarily consists of the ownership and operation of income-producing real estate propertiesapartment communities in the greater Washington, Metro region. We own a diversified portfolio of office buildings, multifamily buildingsDC metro and retail centers.Sunbelt regions.
U.S. Federal Income Taxes
We believe that we qualify as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and intend to continue to qualify as such. We have considered the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA"), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and which generally takes effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, and do not expect the TCJA to have a material impact on our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. To maintain our status as a REIT, we are, among other things, required to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is generally our ordinary taxable income, with certain modifications), excluding any net capital gains and any deductions for dividends paid to our shareholders on an annual basis. When selling a property, we generally have the option of (a) reinvesting the sales proceeds of property sold in a way that allows us to defer recognition of some or all taxable gain realized on the sale, (b) distributing gains to the shareholders with no tax to us or (c) treating net long-term capital gains as having been distributed to our shareholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to our shareholders. DuringWe sold no properties in 2023 or 2022. We sold twelve office and eight retail properties for an aggregate gain of $46.4 million during the three yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, we sold our interests in the following properties (in thousands):2021.
|
| | | | | |
| Disposition Date | Property | Type | Gain on Sale |
| October 23, 2017 | Walker House Apartments | Multifamily | $ | 23,838 |
|
| | | Total 2017 | $ | 23,838 |
|
| | | | |
| May 26, 2016 | Dulles Station II (1) | Office | $ | 527 |
|
| June 27, 2016 | Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I (2) | Office | 23,585 |
|
| September 22, 2016 | Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II (3) | Office | 77,592 |
|
| | | Total 2016 | $ | 101,704 |
|
| | | | |
| March 20, 2015 | Country Club Towers | Multifamily | $ | 30,277 |
|
| September 9, 2015 | 1225 First Street (4) | Multifamily | — |
|
| October 21, 2015 | Munson Hill Towers | Multifamily | 51,395 |
|
| December 14, 2015 | Montgomery Village Center | Retail | 7,981 |
|
| | | Total 2015 | $ | 89,653 |
|
(1)Land held for future development and an interest in a parking garage.
(2) Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I consists of 6110 Executive Boulevard, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Wayne Plaza and West Gude Drive.
(3)Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II consists of 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza.
(4) Interest in land held for future development.
The taxable gains for Walker House Apartments, Dulles Station II and the properties included in Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I were distributed to shareholders through the quarterly dividends. The properties included in Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II were identified for a reverse deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Code. We acquired the replacement property, Riverside Apartments, during the second quarter of 2016 (see note 3, under "Acquisition"). We reinvested a portion of the Country Club Towers, Munson Hill Towers and Montgomery Village Center sales proceeds in replacement properties through deferred tax exchanges.
Generally, and subject to our ongoing qualification as a REIT, no provisions for income taxes are necessary except for taxes on undistributed taxable income and taxes on the income generated by our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). Our TRSs are subject to corporate federal and state income tax on their taxable income at regular statutory rates, or as calculated under the alternative minimum tax, as appropriate. During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized an income tax benefit of $0.7 million from a
reduction of the valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset at one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries.rates. As of both December 31, 2017, a deferred tax asset of our TRSs of $1.4 million was fully reserved. As of December 31, 2016,2023 and 2022, our TRSs had a deferred tax asset of $0.5$1.4 million net of a valuation allowance of $2.9 million. As of December 31, 2017that was fully reserved.
Beginning in 2018, ordinary taxable income per share is equal to the Section 199A dividend that was created by the Tax Cuts and 2016, our TRSs had deferred tax liabilities of $0.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Watergate 600 (see note 3), we recorded a deferred state and local tax liability of approximately $0.6 million. These deferred tax liabilities are primarily related to temporary differences in the timing of the recognition of revenue, amortization and depreciation.
Jobs Act. The following is a breakdown of the taxable percentage of our dividends for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 20152023 (unaudited):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Ordinary income/Section 199A dividends | 33 | % | | 20 | % | | — | % |
| Return of capital | 67 | % | | 80 | % | | 100 | % |
| Qualified dividends | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Capital gain | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Ordinary income | 76 | % | | 66 | % | | 78 | % |
| Return of capital | — | % | | 33 | % | | 22 | % |
| Qualified dividends | 2 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
| Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain | 8 | % | | 1 | % | | — | % |
| Capital gain | 14 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform ("Topic 848"), which was amended in December 2022 by ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). Topic 848 contains practical expedients for reference rate reform related activities that impact debt, leases, derivatives and other contracts. The guidance in Topic 848 is optional and may be elected through December 31, 2024 as reference rate reform activities occur. During the first quarter of 2023, we executed an amendment to the $700.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) to convert the benchmark interest rate from LIBOR to an adjusted SOFR ("Secured Overnight Financing Rate"). We elected to apply the optional expedients in Topic 848 to (i) assert that the hedged interest payments remain probable regardless of any expected modification in terms related to reference rate reform, and (ii) continue the method of assessing effectiveness as documented in the original hedge documentation so that the reference rate on the hypothetical derivative matches the reference rate on the hedging instrument. Application of these expedients preserves the presentation of derivatives consistent with past presentation. The impact of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Washington REITElme Communities and our subsidiaries and entities in which Washington REITElme Communities has a controlling financial interest, including where Washington REIT has been determined to be a primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). See note 3 for additional information on the properties for which there is a noncontrolling interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain immaterial amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. The primary changes to the consolidated statements of operations are reclassifications between property operating and maintenance expense and real estate taxes and insurance expense.
We have prepared the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements Adopted
In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash,which requires that restricted cash and cash equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2016-18 as of December 31, 2017. The impact of the implementation was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities (prior to adoption of ASU 2016-18) | $ | 130,715 |
| | $ | 116,931 |
| | $ | 109,426 |
|
| Impact of including restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents | (89 | ) | | (2,206 | ) | | (108 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities (after adoption of ASU 2016-18) | $ | 130,626 |
| | $ | 114,725 |
| | $ | 109,318 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities (prior to adoption of ASU 2016-18) | $ | (192,902 | ) | | $ | (58,632 | ) | | $ | (93,018 | ) |
| Impact of including restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents | (3,452 | ) | | (4,860 | ) | | 3,192 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities (after adoption of ASU 2016-18) | $ | (196,354 | ) | | $ | (63,492 | ) | | $ | (89,826 | ) |
Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging:Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The transition guidance provides companies with the option of early adopting the new standard using a modified retrospective transition method in any interim period after issuance of the update, or alternatively requires adoption for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2018 and adoption does not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The new standard is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2018 and adoption does not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,which provides specific guidance on how cash receipts and payments should be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows for eight specific issues. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. We adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2018 and adoption does not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which creates a single source of revenue guidance. The new standard provides accounting guidance for all revenue arising from contracts with customers and affects all entities that enter into contracts to provide goods or services to their customers (unless the contracts are in the scope of other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requirements, such as the leasing literature). The guidance also provides a model for the measurement and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of certain nonfinancial assets, such as property and equipment, including real estate. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein. We adopted the new standard for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2018. We evaluated the requirements for recognition of revenue from contracts with customers and measuring gains and losses on the sale of properties in accordance with ASU 2014-09 and concluded that adoption of the new standard will not impact the amount or timing of our revenue recognition.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which amends existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including by requiring lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet and making certain changes to lessor accounting. The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and for interim periods therein with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, for leases in which we are the lessor, the lease contract will be separated into lease and non-lease components in accordance with the provisions outlined within ASU 2014-09. The lease component of the contract will be recognized on a straight-line basis in accordance with ASU 2016-02, while the non-lease component will be recognized under the provisions of ASU 2014-09. For lease contracts with a duration of more than one year in which we are the lessee, the present value of future lease payments will be recognized on our balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. Also, only direct leasing costs may be capitalized under the new standard, while current accounting standards allow for the capitalization of indirect leasing costs. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU 2016-02 may have on Washington REIT’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,which requires financial assets measured at an amortized cost basis, including trade receivables, to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected.
The new standard is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods therein with adoption one year earlier permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the new standard may have on Washington REIT’s consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We primarily lease multifamilyresidential properties under operating leases with terms of generally one year or less. We lease commercial properties (our office and retail segments) under operating leasesRental revenues are recognized in accordance with an average term of seven years. Substantially all commercial leases contain fixed escalations or, in some instances, changes based on the Consumer Price Index, which occur at specified times duringASC Topic 842, Leases, using a method that represents straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Weleases. In circumstances where a lease concession is provided to the resident, primarily in lease-up, we recognize a reduction of rental income and rental abatements from our multifamily and commercial leases when earnedrevenues on a straight-line basis overbasis.
We also generate other property-related revenue associated with the lease term. Recognitionleasing of apartment homes, including parking income, move-in charges, pet rent and other miscellaneous revenue. Similar to rental income, commencessuch revenues are recorded when control of the leased space has been given to the tenant.due from residents and recognized monthly as they are earned.
We recognize sales of real estate at closing only when sufficient down payments have been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and we have no significant continuing involvement.
We recognize cost reimbursement income at our residential properties from pass-through expenses on an accrual basis over the periods in which the expenses were incurred. Pass-through expenses are primarily comprised of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenanceutility costs which are reimbursed by tenantsresidents in accordance with specific allowable costs per tenantresident lease agreements.
Parking revenues are derived from leases, monthly parking agreements and transient parking. We recognize parking revenues from leasesgains on sales of real estate when we have executed a straight-line basis overcontract for sale of the lease termasset, transferred controlling financial interest in the asset to the buyer and other parking revenues as earned.determined that it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the consideration for the asset. Our real estate sale transactions typically meet these criteria at closing.
Accounts ReceivableRents and Allowance for Doubtful AccountsOther Receivables
Accounts receivable primarily representsLease related receivables, which include contractual amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants in accordance withresidents and accrued straight-line rents receivable, are reduced for credit losses. Such amounts are recognized as a reduction to real estate rental revenues. We evaluate the termscollectability of lease receivables on a lease-by-lease basis. We recognize the respective leases, subject to our revenue recognition policy. We reviewcredit loss on lease related receivables monthly and establish reserves when, in the opinion of management, collection of substantially all lease payments is not probable. When collectability is determined not probable, any lease income recognized subsequent to recognizing the receivablecredit loss is doubtful. We establish reserves for tenants whose rent payment histories or financial conditions cast doubt uponlimited to the tenants’ abilities to perform under theirlesser of the lease obligations. When we determine the collection of a receivable to be doubtful in the same quarter that we established the receivable, we recognize the allowance for that receivable as an offset to real estate revenues. When we determine a receivable that was initially established in a prior quarter to be doubtful, we recognize the allowance as an operating expense in Real estate expenses in the consolidated statements of income. In addition to rents due currently, accounts receivable include amounts representing minimal rental income accruedreflected on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases.or cash collected.
Our accounts receivable balances include $0.4 million and $2.4 million of notes receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease is due to the repayment during the fourth quarter of 2017 of a note receivable acquired in 2008 with the purchase of 2445 M Street.
Debt Issuance Costs
We amortize external debt issuance costs using the effective interest rate method or the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest rate method over the estimated life of the related debt. We record debt issuance costs related to notes and mortgage notes, net of amortization, on our consolidated balance sheets as an offset to their related debt. We record debt issuance costs related to revolving lines of credit on our consolidated balance sheets with Prepaid expenses and other assets, regardless of whether a balance on the line of credit is outstanding. We record the amortization of all debt issuance costs as interest expense.
Deferred Leasing Costs
We capitalize and amortize costs associated with the successful negotiation of leases, both external commissions and internal direct costs, on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. We record the amortization of deferred leasing costs in Depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of income. If an applicable lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial lease term, we write off the carrying amount of the costs to amortization expense.
We capitalize and amortize against revenue leasing incentives associated with the successful negotiation of leases on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. We record the amortization of deferred leasing incentives as a reduction of revenue. If an applicable lease terminates prior to the expiration of its initial lease term, we write off the carrying amount of the costs as a reduction of revenue.
Real Estate and Depreciation
We depreciate buildings on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful lives ranging from 28life of 26 to 5040 years. We capitalize all capital improvements associated with replacements, improvements or major repairs to real property that extend its useful life and depreciate them using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 3040 years. We also capitalize
costs incurred in connection with our development projects, including capitalizing interest incurred on borrowing obligations and other internal costs during periods in which qualifying expenditures have been made and activities necessary to get the development projects ready for their intended use are in progress. Capitalization of these costs beginbegins when the activities and related expenditures commence and ceaseceases when the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, at which time the project is placed ininto service and depreciation commences. In addition, we capitalize tenant leasehold improvements when certain criteria are met, including when we supervise construction and will own the improvements. We depreciate all tenant improvements over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the term of the related tenant lease.
Real estate depreciation expense from continuing operations was $90.1$82.7 million, $84.1$77.2 million $80.7and $66.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.
We charge maintenance and repair costs that do not extend an asset’s useful life to expense as incurred.
Interest expense from continuing operations and interest capitalized to real estate assets related to development and major renovation activities for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Total interest incurred | $ | 30,429 | | | $ | 25,223 | | | $ | 34,813 | |
| Capitalized interest | — | | | (283) | | | (750) | |
| Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | $ | 30,429 | | | $ | 24,940 | | | $ | 34,063 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Total interest incurred | $ | 48,498 |
| | $ | 53,794 |
| | $ | 60,204 |
|
| Capitalized interest | (964 | ) | | (668 | ) | | (658 | ) |
| Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | $ | 47,534 |
| | $ | 53,126 |
| | $ | 59,546 |
|
We recognize impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations, development assets or land held for future development if indicators of impairment are present and the net undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets' carrying amount and estimatedamount. Estimates of undiscounted cash flows associated withare based on forward-looking assumptions, including annual and residual cash flows and our estimated holding period for each property. Such assumptions involve a high degree of judgment and could be affected by future economic and market conditions. When determining if a property has indicators of impairment, we evaluate the property's occupancy, our expected holding period for the property, strategic decisions regarding the property's future operations or development expenditures.and other market factors. If such carrying amount is in excess of the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the operation and disposal of the property, we would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its estimated fair value, calculated in accordance with current GAAP fair value provisions. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell.
Asset Acquisitions
The properties we acquire typically are not businesses as defined by ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805)ASC 805("Topic 805") - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.Business. Per this definition, a set of transferred assets and activities is not a business when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. We therefore account for such acquisitions as asset acquisitions. Acquisition costs are capitalized and identifiable assets (including physical assets and in-place leases), liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests are measured by allocating the cost of the acquisition on a relative fair value basis. Acquisitions executed prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01 as of January 1, 2017 were accounted for as business combinations.
We determine the fair values of acquired buildings on an “as-if-vacant” basis considering a variety of factors, including the replacement cost of the property, estimated rental and absorption rates, estimated future cash flows and valuation assumptions consistent with current market conditions. We determine the fair value of land acquired based on comparisons to similar properties that have been recently marketed for sale or sold.
The fair value of in-place leases consists of the following components – (a) the estimated cost to us to replace the leases, including foregone rents during the period of finding a new tenant and foregone recovery of tenant pass-throughs (referred to as “absorption cost”); (b) the estimated cost of tenant improvements, and other direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “tenant origination cost”); (c) estimated leasing commissions associated with obtaining a new tenant (referred to as “leasing commissions”); (d) the above/at/below market cash flow of the leases, determined by comparing the projected cash flows of the leases in place, including consideration of renewal options, to projected cash flows of comparable market-rate leases (referred to as “net lease intangible”); and (e) the value, if any, of customer relationships, determinedare based onupon our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s leasethe leases. Factors considered in the fair value analysis include the estimated cost to replace the leases, including foregone rent and our overall relationship withexpense reimbursements during the tenanthypothetical expected lease-up periods (referred to as “customer relationship value”“absorption cost”).
We have attributed no value, consideration of current market conditions and costs to customer relationships as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
We discount the amounts used to calculate net lease intangibles using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired. We classify tenant origination costs as income producing property on our consolidated balance sheets and amortize the tenant origination costs as depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlyingexecute similar leases. We classify leasing commissions and absorption costs as other assets and amortize leasing commissions and absorption costs as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the underlying leases. We classify net lease intangible assets as other assets and amortize them on a straight-line basis as a decrease to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. We classify net lease intangible liabilities as other liabilities and amortize them on a straight-line basis as an increase to real estate rental revenue over the remaining term of the underlying leases. If any of the fair value of below market lease intangibles includes fair value associated with a renewal option, such amounts are not amortized until the renewal option is executed, else the related value is expensed at that time. Should a tenant terminate its lease, we accelerate the amortization of the unamortized portion of the tenant origination cost, leasing commissions, absorption costs and net lease intangible associated with that lease, over its new, shorter term.
Balances, net of accumulated depreciation or amortization, as appropriate, of the components of the fair value of in-place leases at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Tenant origination costs | $ | 66,378 |
| | $ | 50,157 |
| | $ | 16,221 |
| | $ | 54,352 |
| | $ | 44,823 |
| | $ | 9,529 |
|
| Leasing commissions/absorption costs | 123,992 |
| | 95,115 |
| | 28,877 |
| | 101,311 |
| | 86,210 |
| | 15,101 |
|
| Net lease intangible assets | 19,362 |
| | 16,089 |
| | 3,273 |
| | 18,903 |
| | 14,193 |
| | 4,710 |
|
| Net lease intangible liabilities | 43,230 |
| | 28,174 |
| | 15,056 |
| | 33,687 |
| | 25,359 |
| | 8,328 |
|
| Below-market ground lease intangible asset | 12,080 |
| | 1,903 |
| | 10,177 |
| | 12,080 |
| | 1,714 |
| | 10,366 |
|
Amortization of these combined components during the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 14,911 |
| | $ | 17,655 |
| | $ | 22,244 |
|
| Real estate rental revenue (increase) decrease, net | (922 | ) | | 410 |
| | 538 |
|
| | $ | 13,989 |
| | $ | 18,065 |
| | $ | 22,782 |
|
Amortization of these combined components over the next five years is projected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Depreciation and amortization expense | | Real estate rental revenue, net increase | | Total |
| 2018 | $ | 13,456 |
| | $ | (1,574 | ) | | $ | 11,882 |
|
| 2019 | 6,485 |
| | (1,633 | ) | | 4,852 |
|
| 2020 | 4,905 |
| | (1,335 | ) | | 3,570 |
|
| 2021 | 3,729 |
| | (1,191 | ) | | 2,538 |
|
| 2022 | 3,058 |
| | (1,155 | ) | | 1,903 |
|
| Thereafter | 23,642 |
| | (4,895 | ) | | 18,747 |
|
Software Developed for Internal Use
The costs of software developed for internal use that qualify for capitalization are included with Prepaid expenses and other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. These capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and expenses for employees who are directly associated with the development of the applications. Capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and continues until the project is
substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose. Completed projects are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
We classify properties as held for sale when they meet the necessary criteria, which include: (a) senior management commits to and actively embarks upon a plan to sell the assets,assets; (b) the assets are available for immediate sale is expectedin their present condition subject only to be completed within one year under terms that are usual and customary for sales of such salesassets; (c) an active program to locate a buyer and (c)other actions required to complete the plan to sell the assets has been initiated; (d) the sale of the assets is probable and transfer of the assets is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; (e) the assets are being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. We generally consider that a property has met these criteria when a sale of the property has been approved by the board of trustees, or a committee with authorization from the board of trustees, there are no known significant contingencies related to the sale and management believes it is probable that the sale will be completed within one year. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued at the time they are classified as held for sale, but operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense continue to be recognized until the date of sale.
Revenues and expenses of properties that are either sold or classified as held for sale are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations if the dispositions represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results. Interest on debt that can be identified as specifically attributed to these properties is included in discontinued operations. If the dispositions do not represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results, then the revenues and expenses of the properties that are classified as sold or held for sale are presented as continuing operations in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations for all periods presented.
Segments
We evaluate performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable operating segments are consolidationssegment is a consolidation of similar properties. GAAP requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segments’ performance. Net operating income is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss. Net operating income is defined as segment real estate rental revenue less segment real estate expenses.
Cash, and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and commercial paper with original maturities of 90 days or less. We maintain cash deposits with financial institutions that at times exceed applicable insurance limits. We reduce this risk by maintaining such deposits with high quality financial institutions that management believes are credit-worthy.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes funds escrowed for tenant security deposits, real estate tax, insurancedeposits.
Transformation Costs
Transformation costs include costs related to the strategic shift away from the commercial sector to residential sector, including the allocation of internal costs, consulting, advisory and mortgage escrows and escrow deposits required by lenders on certain of our properties to be used for future building renovations or tenant improvements.termination benefits.
Earnings Per Common Share
We determine “Basic earnings per share” using the two-class method as our unvested restricted share awards and units have non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are therefore considered participating securities. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to the controlling interest less the allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
We also determine “Diluted earnings per share” under the two-class method with respect to the unvested restricted share awards. We further evaluate any other potentially dilutive securities at the end of the period and adjust the basic earnings per share calculation for the impact of those securities that are dilutive. Our dilutive earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive impact of employee stock options based onoperating partnership units under the treasury stockif-converted method and our share based awards with performance share unitsconditions prior to the grant date and all market condition awards under the contingently issuable method.
Share-Based Compensation
We currently maintain equity based compensation plans for trustees, officers and employees.
We recognize compensation expense for service-based share awards ratably over the period from the service inception date through the vesting period based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. We account for forfeitures as they occur. If an award's service inception date precedes the grant date, we initially measure compensation expense for awards with performance conditions at fair value at the service inception date based on probability of payout, and we remeasure compensation expense at subsequent reporting dates until all of the award’s key terms and conditions are known and the grant date is established. We amortize awards with performance conditions
using the graded expense method. We measure compensation expense for awards with market conditions based on the grant date fair value, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, and we amortize the expense ratably over the requisite service period, regardless of whether the market conditions are achieved and the awards ultimately vest. Compensation expense for the trustee grants, which fully vest immediately, is fully recognized upon issuance based upon the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
We can recognize a tax benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that a particular tax position will be sustained upon examination or audit. To the extent that the “more likely than not” standard has been satisfied, the benefit associated with a tax position is measured as the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being recognized upon settlement. As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, we did not have any unrecognized tax benefits. We do not believe that there will be any material changes to our uncertain tax positions over the next twelve months.
We are subject to federal income tax as well as income tax of the states of Maryland, Virginia and Virginia,Georgia, and the District of Columbia. However, as a REIT, we generally are not subject to income tax on our taxable income to the extent it is distributed as dividends to our shareholders.
Tax returns filed for 20132020 through 20172022 tax years are subject to examination by taxing authorities. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in our financial statements as a component of general and administrative expense.expenses.
Derivatives
We borrow funds at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility and term loans bear interest at variable rates. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to minimize interest rate fluctuation on long-term indebtedness and limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as collars, swaps, caps and treasury lock agreements in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We generally do not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. The interest rate swaps we enter into are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. We assess the effectiveness of our cash flow hedges both at inception and on an ongoing basis. The effective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Our cash flow hedges become ineffective if critical terms of the hedging instrument and the debt instrument, such as notional amounts, settlement dates, reset dates, calculation period and LIBORSOFR do not perfectly match. In addition, we evaluate the default risk of the counterparty by monitoring the creditworthiness of the counterparty.its creditworthiness. When ineffectiveness of a cash flow hedge exists, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps associated with our cash flow hedges is recognized in earnings in the period affected.
NOTE 3: REAL ESTATE
As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, our real estate investment portfolio classified as income producing property that is held and used, at cost, consists of properties valued as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Residential | $ | 2,249,833 | | | $ | 2,098,010 | |
Other (1) | 94,284 | | | 172,996 | |
| $ | 2,344,117 | | | $ | 2,271,006 | |
______________________________ |
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Office | $ | 1,355,033 |
| | $ | 1,349,378 |
|
| Multifamily | 895,811 |
| | 885,084 |
|
| Retail | 451,158 |
| | 450,941 |
|
| | $ | 2,702,002 |
| | $ | 2,685,403 |
|
Our results of operations are dependent on the overall economic health of our markets tenants and the specific segments inresidents which we own properties. These segments include office, retail and multifamily. All segments are affected by external economic factors, such as inflation, consumer confidence and unemployment rates, as well as changing tenantresidents and consumer requirements.
As of December 31, 2017, no2023, one property, Riverside Apartments, accounted for more than approximately 10% of total assets. No single property or tenant accounted forassets and more than approximately 10% of the real estate rental revenue.
WeFrom time to time, we have properties under development/redevelopment and held for current or future development as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. In the office segment, we had a redevelopment project at the Army Navy Building, an office property in Washington, DC,
to upgrade its common areas and add significant amenities in order to make the property more competitive within its sub-market. As of December 31, 2017, we had invested $4.8 million in the redevelopment and placed substantially all of the project into service.
In the multifamily segment, we have The Trove, a multifamily development adjacent to The Wellington, and own land held for future multifamily development adjacent to Riverside Apartments. As of December 31, 2017, we had invested $29.7 million and $19.2 million, including the costs of acquired land, in the Trove and the development adjacent to Riverside Apartments, respectively.
In the retail segment, we currently have a redevelopment project to add rentable space at Spring Valley Village. As of December 31, 2017, we had invested $3.6 million in the redevelopment.
development. The cost of our real estate portfolio under development or held for future development as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands):2022 was $31.0 million and $31.3 million, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Office | $ | 680 |
| | $ | 2,640 |
|
| Multifamily | 49,616 |
| | 36,013 |
|
| Retail | 4,126 |
| | 1,579 |
|
| | $ | 54,422 |
| | $ | 40,232 |
|
Acquisitions
Our current strategy is to recycle legacy assets that lack the income growth potential we seek and to invest in high-quality assets with compelling value-add returns through redevelopment opportunities in our existing portfolio and acquisitions that meet our stringent investment criteria. We focus on properties inside the Washington metro region’s Beltway, near major transportation nodes and in areas with strong employment drivers and superior growth demographics.
Properties and land for development acquired during the three years ended December 31, 20172023 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition Date | | Property | | Type | | # of Homes (unaudited) | | Ending Occupancy | | Contract
Purchase Price
(in thousands) |
| September 29, 2023 | | Elme Druid Hills | | Residential | | 500 | | | 93.8% | | $ | 108,000 | |
| | | | | | 500 | | | | | $ | 108,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| February 1, 2022 | | Elme Sandy Springs | | Residential | | 389 | | | 91.3% | | $ | 105,586 | |
| May 5, 2022 | | Elme Marietta | | Residential | | 420 | | 90.7% | | 107,900 | |
| May 5, 2022 | | Elme Cumberland | | Residential | | 270 | | 91.1% | | 69,750 | |
| | | | | | 1,079 | | | | | $ | 283,236 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| August 10, 2021 | | Elme Conyers | | Residential | | 240 | | 93.3% | | $ | 48,000 | |
| November 19, 2021 | | Elme Eagles Landing | | Residential | | 490 | | 89.0% | | 106,000 | |
| | | | | | 730 | | | | | $ | 154,000 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition Date | | Property | | Type | | # of units (unaudited) | | Rentable Square Feet (unaudited) | | Contract Purchase Price (in thousands) |
| April 4, 2017 | | Watergate 600 | | Office | | N/A | | 293,000 | | $ | 135,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| May 20, 2016 | | Riverside Apartments | | Multifamily | | 1,222 | | N/A | | $ | 244,750 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 1, 2015 | | The Wellington | | Multifamily | | 711 | | N/A | | $ | 167,000 |
|
The results of operations from acquired operating properties are included in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations as of their acquisition dates.
The revenue and earnings of our acquisitions during their year of acquisition for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 2,549 | | | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 2,262 | |
| Net loss | (1,511) | | | (11,126) | | | (1,921) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 14,518 |
| | $ | 13,112 |
| | $ | 6,797 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 2,226 |
| | (1,688 | ) | | (2,748 | ) |
As discussed in note 2, we record the acquired physical assets (land building and tenant improvements),building) and in-place leases (absorption tenant origination costs, leasing commissions, and net lease intangible assets/liabilities),costs) and any other assumed liabilities by allocating the total cost of the acquisitions on a relative fair value basis.
We recorded the total cost of the above acquisitions as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Land | $ | 45,981 |
| | $ | 38,924 |
| | $ | 30,548 |
|
| Land held for development | — |
| | 15,968 |
| | 15,000 |
|
| Buildings | 66,241 |
| | 184,854 |
| | 116,563 |
|
| Tenant origination costs | 12,084 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Leasing commissions/absorption costs | 23,161 |
| | 4,992 |
| | 4,889 |
|
| Net lease intangible assets | 498 |
| | 22 |
| | — |
|
| Net lease intangible liabilities | (9,585 | ) | | (10 | ) | | — |
|
| Deferred tax liability | (560 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 137,820 |
| | $ | 244,750 |
| | $ | 167,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Land | $ | 25,249 | | | $ | 50,547 | | | $ | 20,914 | |
| | | | | |
| Building | 79,281 | | | 220,825 | | | 128,540 | |
| | | | | |
| Absorption costs | 3,660 | | | 7,300 | | | 4,786 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Aggregate discount on assumed mortgages | — | | | 5,042 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Total acquisition cost | 108,190 | | | 283,714 | | | 154,240 | |
| Outstanding balance on assumed mortgages | — | | | (76,554) | | — |
| Total carrying amounts recorded | $ | 108,190 | | $ | 207,160 | | $ | 154,240 |
| | | | | |
The weighted average remaining average life for 2017 acquisition components above, other than land and building, are 89 months for tenant origination costs, 82 months for leasing commissions/the absorption costs 13 months for net lease intangible assets and 102 months for net lease intangible liabilities.is four months.
The difference in the total contract purchase priceacquisition cost of $135.0$108.2 million for the 20172023 acquisition and the cash paid for the 2023 acquisition per the consolidated statements of cash flows of $138.4$107.6 million is primarily due to capitalized acquisition-related costs ($2.8 million) and a net credit to the buyer for certain expenditures ($1.0 million), partially offset by the issuance of 12,124 operating partnership units (“Operating Partnership Units”) as part of the consideration ($0.4 million). The Operating Partnership Units are units in WashREIT Watergate 600 OP LP, a consolidated subsidiary of Washington REIT. These Operating Partnership Units may be redeemed for either cash equal to the fair market value of a share of Washington REIT common stockcredits received at the time of redemption (based on a 20-day average price) or, at the option of Washington REIT, one registered or unregistered share of Washington REIT common stock. In connection with the 2017 acquisition, we granted registration rights to the two contributors of the Watergate 600 property relating to the resale of any shares issued upon exchange of Operating Partnership Units pursuant to a shelf registration statement that we have an obligation to make available to the contributors approximately one year after the issuance of the Operating Partnership Units.settlement totaling $0.6 million.
The difference in the total contract pricecost of $244.8the 2022 acquisitions of $283.7 million for the 2016 acquisition2022 acquisitions and cash paid for the acquisition per the consolidated statements of cash flows of $227.4 million is primarily due to acquisition of land for development of $16.0 million and credits received at settlement totaling $1.4 million.
The difference in the total contract price of $167.0 million for the 2015 acquisitions and cash paid for the acquisitions per the consolidated statements of cash flows of $151.9$204.4 million is primarily due to acquisitionthe assumption of landtwo mortgage notes secured by Elme Marietta and Elme Cumberland for developmentan aggregate outstanding balance of $15.0$76.6 million and credits received at settlement totaling $0.1$2.8 million. In September 2022, we extinguished the liabilities associated with the two mortgage notes though defeasance arrangements.
The difference in the total cost of the 2021 acquisitions of $154.2 million and the cash paid for the 2021 acquisitions per the consolidated statements of cash flows of $153.7 million is primarily due to credits received at settlement totaling $0.5 million.
Variable Interest EntitiesFair Value of In-place Leases
In November 2011, we executed a joint venture operating agreement with a real estate development company to develop a high-rise multifamily property at 1225 First Street in Alexandria, Virginia. Washington REIT and the real estate development company owned 95% and 5%Balances, net of accumulated depreciation or amortization, as appropriate, of the joint venture, respectively. During the second quarter of 2015, we determined that we would not develop the property and began negotiations to sell our interest in the joint venture. We recognized a $5.9 million impairment charge for the second quarter of 2015 in order to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value. We based this fair value on the contract sale price in the purchase and sale agreement. This fair valuation falls into Level 2components of the fair value hierarchy. During the third quarter of 2015, we sold our 95% interest in the joint venture for a contract sale price of $14.5 million and deconsolidated the entity, as this joint venture had previously been consolidated as Washington REIT was the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
In June 2011, we executed a joint venture operating agreement with a real estate development company to develop The Maxwell, a mid-rise multifamily property in Arlington, Virginia. Major construction activitiesin-place leases at The Maxwell ended during December 2014, and the building became available for occupancy during the first quarter of 2015. Washington REIT was the 90% owner of the joint venture. The real estate development company owned 10% of the joint venture and was responsible for the development and construction of the property. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we purchased the 10% joint venture interest from the real estate development company for a contract purchase price of $4.1 million. Upon the completion of this transaction, the joint venture ended and Washington REIT became sole owner of The Maxwell.
We determined that, prior to completion of this transaction, The Maxwell joint venture was a VIE primarily based on the fact that the equity investment at risk was not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support. We also determined that Washington REIT was the primary beneficiary of the VIE due to the fact that Washington REIT was determined to have a controlling financial interest in the entity. In January 2016, Washington REIT exercised its right to purchase at par The Maxwell’s construction loan from the original third-party lender. Upon the purchase, the construction loan became an intercompany loan payable from the consolidated VIE to Washington REIT that is eliminated in consolidation. The intercompany loan payable was extinguished as part of Washington REIT’s purchase of the joint venture partner’s 10% interest during the fourth quarter of 2017.
We include joint venture land acquisitions and related capitalized development costs on our consolidated balance sheets in properties under development or held for future development until placed in service or sold. The Maxwell was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2015.
As of December 31, 2016, The Maxwell joint venture's assets2023 and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Tenant origination costs | $ | 2,262 | | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 1,981 | | | $ | 11,723 | | | $ | 8,000 | | | $ | 3,723 | |
| Leasing commissions/absorption costs | 67,504 | | | 60,887 | | | 6,617 | | | 63,064 | | | 56,416 | | | 6,648 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net lease intangible liabilities | 13,055 | | | 10,499 | | | 2,556 | | | 13,055 | | | 9,683 | | | 3,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |
| | December 31, 2016 |
| Land | $ | 12,851 |
|
| Income producing property | 37,949 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (4,571 | ) |
| Other assets | 456 |
|
| | $ | 46,685 |
|
AsAmortization of these combined components during the three years ended December 31, 2016, The Maxwell joint venture's liabilities were2023, was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | December 31, 2016 |
Mortgage notes payable, net (1) | $ | 31,869 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 186 |
|
| Tenant security deposits | 99 |
|
| | $ | 32,154 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 4,530 | | | $ | 12,604 | | | $ | 4,378 | |
| Real estate rental revenue increase, net | (806) | | | (944) | | | (765) | |
| $ | 3,724 | | | $ | 11,660 | | | $ | 3,613 | |
(1) The mortgage notes payable balance
Amortization of these combined components over the next four years is projected to be as of December 31, 2016 was eliminated in consolidation due to the purchase of the loan by Washington REIT in January 2016. The mortgage note payable was extinguished during the fourth quarter of 2017 due to Washington REIT’s purchase of the joint venture partner's interest.follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | | Real estate rental revenue, net increase | | Total |
| 2024 | $ | 3,870 | | | $ | (708) | | | $ | 3,162 | |
| 2025 | 2,011 | | | (710) | | | 1,301 | |
| 2026 | 1,698 | | | (662) | | | 1,036 | |
| 2027 | 1,019 | | | (476) | | | 543 | |
| 2028 | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Properties Sold and Held for Sale
We intend to hold our properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring, developing and owning our properties, and to make occasional sales of the properties that no longer meet our long-term strategy or return objectives and where market conditions for sale are favorable. The proceeds from the sales may be reinvested into other properties, used to fund development operations or to support other corporate needs or distributed to our shareholders. Depreciation on these properties is discontinued when classified as held for sale, but operating revenues, other operating expenses and interest continue to be recognized untilthrough the date of sale.
We sold no properties in 2023 and 2022. We sold twelve office and eight retail properties for an aggregate gain of $46.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. The dispositions of the office and retail properties in 2021 represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on our financial results, and we accordingly reported them as discontinued operations.
We have fully transferred control of the assets associated with these disposed properties and do not have continuing involvement in the operations of these properties.
Real Estate Impairment
During the second quarter of 2017,2023, we executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Walker House Apartments, a 212 unit multifamily property in Gaithersburg, Maryland, for a contract sale price of $32.2 million. We closed on the sale during the fourth quarter of 2017, recognizing a gain on sale of $23.8 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, we executed a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of Braddock Metro Center, a 356,000 square foot office property in Alexandria, Virginia for a contract sale price of $93.0 million, and closed on the sale in January 2018. We determined that the property met the criteria for classification as held for sale as of December 31, 2017. Due to the negotiations to sell the property, we evaluated Braddock Metro Center for impairment and recognized a $9.1 millionan impairment charge during 2017of $41.9 million on Watergate 600 in order to reduce theits carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value, less selling costs. We based thiswhich declined due to changes in market conditions in the Washington, DC metro region office market. The estimated fair valuation on the expected sale price from a potential sale. Therevalue is inherently subjective because there are few observable market transactions for similar office properties. This fair valuation fallsfell into Level 2 of3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its reliance on significant unobservable inputs (see note 9). In accordance with ASC 820, we estimated the fair value using a quoted price indiscounted cash flow model which required certain significant assumptions, including a market that is not active.discounted cash flow term of 5 years, an average economic occupancy of 80.5%, and a terminal capitalization rate of 7.5%.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, we marketed for sale 2445 M Street, a 292,000 square foot office property in Washington, DC. The property did not meet the criteria for classification asNo other properties, including assets held for development, had any recognized impairment charges during 2023. Should external or internal circumstances change requiring the need to shorten holding periods or adjust future estimated cash flows from our properties, we could be required to record additional impairment charges in the future.
Discontinued Operations
The results of the twelve office and eight retail properties sold in 2021 are classified as discontinued operations and are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands, except for share data):
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| Real estate rental revenue | | | | $ | 70,519 | |
| Expenses: | | | | |
| Property operating and maintenance | | | | (11,201) | |
| Real estate taxes and insurance | | | | (11,136) | |
| Property management | | | | (2,195) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | (22,904) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Gain on sale of real estate, net | | | | 46,441 | |
| Income from discontinued operations | | | | $ | 69,524 | |
| | | | |
| Basic net income per share | | | | $ | 0.82 | |
| Diluted net income per share | | | | $ | 0.82 | |
| | | | |
| Capital expenditures | | | | $ | 3,316 | |
All assets and liabilities related to the twelve office properties (the “Office Portfolio”) and eight retail properties (the “Retail Portfolio”) were sold as of December 31, 2017. Due2021.
NOTE 4: LEASE ACCOUNTING
Leasing as a Lessee
For leases where we are the lessee, primarily in our corporate office operating lease, we recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in accordance with ASC Topic 842. The right-of-use asset and associated liability is equal to the negotiations to sell
the property, we evaluated 2445 M Street for impairment and recognized a $24.1 million impairment charge during 2017 in order to reduce the carryingpresent value of the propertyminimum lease payments, applying our incremental borrowing rate. Our borrowing rate is computed based on observable borrowing rates taking into consideration our credit quality and adjusting to its estimated fair value. We based this fair valuationa secured borrowing rate for similar assets and term. Our right-of-use asset and lease liability are recorded within Prepaid expenses and other assets and Accounts payable and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, respectively.
Lease expense for the operating lease is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected sale price from a potential sale. There are few observable market transactions for similar properties. This fair valuation falls into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy due to its reliance on a quoted price in a market that is not active.
On January 23, 2018, we executed a purchaselease term and sale agreement to sell 2445 M Street for a contract sale price of $100.0 million. We anticipate settlement in the third quarter of 2018, however, there can be no assurances that this proposed sale will be consummated. Upon execution of the purchase and sale agreement, the property met the criteria for classification as held for sale.
During the second quarter of 2016, we sold Dulles Station, Phase II, which consists of land held for future development and an interest in a parking garage in Herndon, Virginia, for $12.1 million. Also during the second quarter of 2016, we executed two purchase and sale agreements with a single buyer for the sale of a portfolio of six office properties located in Maryland: 6110 Executive Boulevard, Wayne Plaza, 600 Jefferson Plaza, West Gude Drive, 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza (collectively, the "Maryland Office Portfolio") for an aggregate contract sale price of $240.0 million. We closed on the first sale transaction in June 2016 and closed on the second sale transaction in September 2016.
We sold our interests in the following properties during the three years ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Disposition Date | | Property | | Segment | | # of units (unaudited) | | Rentable
Square Feet
(unaudited) | | Contract
Sale Price
(in thousands) | | Gain on Sale
(in thousands) |
| October 23, 2017 | | Walker House Apartments | | Multifamily | | 212 |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 32,200 |
| | $ | 23,838 |
|
| | | | | Total 2017 | | | | | | $ | 32,200 |
| | $ | 23,838 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| May 26, 2016 | | Dulles Station, Phase II (1) | | Office | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 12,100 |
| | $ | 527 |
|
| June 27, 2016 | | Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I (2) | | Office | | N/A |
| | 692,000 |
| | 111,500 |
| | 23,585 |
|
| September 22, 2016 | | Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II (3) | | Office | | N/A |
| | 491,000 |
| | 128,500 |
| | 77,592 |
|
| | | | | Total 2016 | | | | 1,183,000 |
| | $ | 252,100 |
| | $ | 101,704 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 20, 2015 | | Country Club Towers | | Multifamily | | 227 |
| | N/A |
| | $ | 37,800 |
| | $ | 30,277 |
|
| September 9, 2015 | | 1225 First Street (4) | | Multifamily | | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | 14,500 |
| | — |
|
| October 21, 2015 | | Munson Hill Towers | | Multifamily | | 279 |
| | N/A |
| | 57,050 |
| | 51,395 |
|
| December 14, 2015 | | Montgomery Village Center | | Retail | | N/A |
| | 197,000 |
| | 27,750 |
| | 7,981 |
|
| | | | | Total 2015 | | 506 |
| | 197,000 |
| | $ | 137,100 |
| | $ | 89,653 |
|
| |
(1)
| Land held for future development and an interest in a parking garage. |
| |
(2)
| Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction I consists of 6110 Executive Boulevard, 600 Jefferson Plaza, Wayne Plaza and West Gude Drive. |
| |
(3)
| Maryland Office Portfolio Transaction II consists of 51 Monroe Street and One Central Plaza.
|
| |
(4)
| Interest in land held for future development. |
We do not have significant continuing involvement in the operations of the disposed properties.
While the Maryland Office Portfolio, in the aggregate, constitutes an individually significant disposition, it does not qualify for presentation and disclosure as a discontinued operation as it does not represent a strategic shift in our operations.
Real estate rental revenue and net income for the Maryland Office Portfolio for the three years ended December 31, 2017 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ending December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,266 |
| | $ | 32,423 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | 9,376 |
| | 9,848 |
|
Casualty Gains
We recorded a net casualty gain of $0.7 million during the second quarter of 2016 associated with a fire at Bethesda Hill Towers that damaged four units, which is included in real estate impairment“General and casualty (gain), netadministrative expense.”
Leasing as a Lessor
Future Minimum Rental Income
As of December 31, 2023, non-cancelable commercial operating leases provide for future minimum rental income from continuing operations as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| 2024 | | $ | 16,351 | |
| 2025 | | 15,151 | |
| 2026 | | 15,084 | |
| 2027 | | 13,340 | |
| 2028 | | 6,134 | |
| Thereafter | | 42,636 | |
| | $ | 108,696 | |
Apartment leases are not included as the terms are generally for one year or less. Rental income under most of these commercial leases increase in future years based on our consolidated statements of income. The net casualty gain is comprised of $0.9 millionagreed-upon percentages or in third-party insurance proceeds received by us, which were partially offset by casualty charges of $0.2 million to write offsome instances, changes in the net book value of the damaged units at Bethesda Hill Towers.Consumer Price Index.
NOTE 4:5: MORTGAGE NOTESNOTE PAYABLE
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,In May 2022, we had outstandingassumed a $42.8 million mortgage notes payable, each collateralized by one or more buildings and related land from our portfolio, as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | December 31, | | |
| Properties | | Assumption/Issuance Date (1) | | Effective Interest Rate (2) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | Payoff Date/Maturity Date |
Army Navy Building (3) | | 3/26/2014 | | 3.18 | % | | $ | — |
| | $ | 49,618 |
| | 2/1/2017 |
Yale West (4) | | 2/21/2014 | | 3.75 | % | | 46,629 |
| | 47,078 |
| | 1/31/2022 |
| Olney Village Center | | 8/30/2011 | | 4.94 | % | | 13,091 |
| | 14,851 |
| | 10/1/2023 |
Kenmore Apartments (5) | | 2/2/2009 | | 5.37 | % | | 32,194 |
| | 32,938 |
| | 9/1/2018 |
| | | | | | | 91,914 |
| | 144,485 |
| | |
| Premiums and discounts, net | | | | | | 3,385 |
| | 4,354 |
| | |
| Debt issuance costs, net | | | | (158 | ) | | (299 | ) | | |
| | | | | | | $ | 95,141 |
| | $ | 148,540 |
| | |
(1) Each of these mortgages was assumednote in connection with the acquisition of the collateralized properties, exceptElme Marietta. This mortgage note bore interest at 3.36% per annum. The effective interest rate on this mortgage note was 4.50% based on quotes obtained for similar loans. We recorded the mortgage note secured by Kenmore Apartments, which was originally executed by Washington REIT. We record mortgages assumed in an acquisition at fair value.
(2) Yield on the assumption/issuance date, including the effects of any premiums, discounts orits estimated fair value adjustments on the notes.
(3) The note was prepaid without penalty in February 2017.
(4) The maturity date of the mortgage note is January 1, 2052, but can be prepaid, without penalty, beginning on January 31, 2022.
(5) The maturity date of the mortgage note is March 1, 2019, but can be prepaid, without penalty, beginning on September 1, 2018.
Except as noted above, principal$40.0 million. Principal and interest arewere payable monthly until the maturity date, uponMay 1, 2030, at which time all unpaid principal and interest arewere payable in full.
Total cost basisIn May 2022, we assumed a $33.7 million mortgage note in connection with the acquisition of Elme Cumberland. This mortgage note bore interest at 2.93% per annum. The effective interest rate on this mortgage note was 4.00% based on quotes obtained for similar loans. We recorded the mortgage note at its estimated fair value of $31.5 million. Principal and interest were payable monthly until May 1, 2030, at which time all unpaid principal and interest were payable in full.
In September 2022, we extinguished the liabilities associated with both of the above mortgaged properties was $208.3 million and $280.4 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.mortgage notes through defeasance arrangements, recognizing aggregate losses on extinguishment of debt of $4.9 million.
Scheduled principal payments subsequent to December 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2018 | $ | 34,544 |
|
| 2019 | 2,500 |
|
| 2020 | 2,659 |
|
| 2021 | 2,829 |
|
| 2022 | 46,984 |
|
| Thereafter | 2,398 |
|
| | $ | 91,914 |
|
NOTE 5:6: UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT PAYABLE
During the secondthird quarter of 2015,2021, we terminated our $100.0entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) which provides for a $700 million unsecured linerevolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and the continuation of credit maturing in June 2015 and our $400.0an existing $250.0 million unsecured line of credit maturing in July 2016, and executed a new $600.0 million unsecured credit agreement ("term loan (“2018 Term Loan”). The Revolving Credit Facility") that maturesFacility has a four-year term ending in June 2019, unless extended pursuant to one or both of theAugust 2025, with two six-month extension options. The Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement has an accordion feature that allows us to increase the aggregate facility to $1.0$1.5 billion, subject to the extent the lenders agreelenders’ agreement to provide additional revolving loan commitments or term loans. InAs a result of the transaction, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million related to the write off of unamortized loan origination costs. We incurred $4.8 million of additional loan origination costs which are amortized as interest expense over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility.
On September 2015,27, 2021, we entered intoprepaid a $150.0 million unsecured term loan ("2015 Term Loan") by executing a portion of the accordion feature under2018 Term Loan using proceeds from the sale of the Office Portfolio and Retail Portfolio (see note 3). As a result of the prepayment, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan origination costs. Simultaneous with the prepayment, we terminated five interest rate swap arrangements.
During the first quarter of 2023, we prepaid the remaining $100.0 million portion of the 2018 Term Loan and executed an amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility. The 2015 Term Loan has a 5.5 year term and currently has anFacility to convert the benchmark interest rate of one monthfrom LIBOR plus 110 basis points, based on Washington REIT's current unsecured debt ratings. We entered into twoto an adjusted SOFR, with no change in the applicable interest rate swapsmargins. The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a rate of daily SOFR plus 0.10% plus a margin ranging from 0.70% to effectively fix1.40%. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.30% (in each case, depending on Elme Communities’ credit rating) on the $700.0 million committed revolving loan capacity, without regard to usage. As of December 31, 2023, the interest rate at 2.7% (see note 7)on the Revolving Credit Facility is based on an adjusted daily SOFR (inclusive of the 0.10% credit spread adjustment) plus 0.85% applicable margin, the daily SOFR is 5.38% and the facility fee is 0.20%.
The amount of the Revolving Credit Facility unused and available at December 31, 20172023 was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Committed capacity | $ | 700,000 | |
| Borrowings outstanding | (157,000) | |
| |
| Unused and available | $ | 543,000 | |
|
| | | |
| Committed capacity | $ | 600,000 |
|
| Borrowings outstanding | (166,000 | ) |
| Unused and available | $ | 434,000 |
|
We executed borrowings and repayments on the Revolving Credit Facility during 20172023 as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2022 | $ | 55,000 | |
| Borrowings | 322,000 | |
| Repayments | (220,000) | |
| Balance, December 31, 2023 | $ | 157,000 | |
|
| | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 120,000 |
|
| Borrowings | 274,000 |
|
| Repayments | (228,000 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 166,000 |
|
The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.55% or the base rate plus a margin ranging from 0% to 0.55% (in each case depending upon Washington REIT’s credit rating). The base rate is the highest of the administrative agent's prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and the LIBOR market index rate plus 1.0%. As of December 31, 2017, the interest rate on the facility is LIBOR plus 1.0% and the one month LIBOR was 1.56%.
All outstanding advances for the Revolving Credit Facility are due and payable upon maturity in June 2019,August 2025, unless extended
pursuant to one or both of the two six-month extension options. Interest only payments are due and payable generally on a monthly basis. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.30% (depending on Washington REIT’s credit rating) on the $600.0 million committed capacity, without regard to usage. As of December 31, 2017, the facility fee is 0.20%.
For the three years ended December 31, 2017,2023, we recognized interest expense (excluding facility fees) and facility fees as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Interest expense (excluding facility fees) | $ | 4,419 | | | $ | 912 | | | $ | 390 | |
| Facility fees | 1,454 | | | 1,454 | | | 1,419 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Interest expense (excluding facility fees) | $ | 3,857 |
| | $ | 3,272 |
| | $ | 2,266 |
|
| Facility fees | 1,217 |
| | 1,220 |
| | 1,241 |
|
The Revolving Credit Facility contains and the prior unsecured credit facility that it replaced contained certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have met as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022. Included in these covenants are limits on our total indebtedness, secured and unsecured indebtedness and required debt service payments.
Information related to revolving credit facilities for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 as follows (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Total revolving credit facilities at December 31 | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 700,000 | | | $ | 700,000 | |
| Borrowings outstanding at December 31 | 157,000 | | | 55,000 | | | — | |
| Weighted average daily borrowings during the year | 70,578 | | | 21,636 | | | 34,803 | |
| Maximum daily borrowings during the year | 164,000 | | | 67,000 | | | 79,000 | |
| Weighted average interest rate during the year | 6.17 | % | | 4.22 | % | | 1.12 | % |
| Weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding at December 31 | 6.26 | % | | 5.20 | % | | — | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Total revolving credit facilities at December 31 | $ | 600,000 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
|
| Borrowings outstanding at December 31 | 166,000 |
| | 120,000 |
| | 105,000 |
|
| Weighted average daily borrowings during the year | 179,633 |
| | 214,962 |
| | 167,573 |
|
| Maximum daily borrowings during the year | 252,000 |
| | 358,000 |
| | 350,000 |
|
| Weighted average interest rate during the year | 2.15 | % | | 1.52 | % | | 1.35 | % |
| Weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding at December 31 | 2.54 | % | | 1.64 | % | | 1.36 | % |
The covenants under our Revolving Credit FacilityAgreement require us to insure our properties against loss or damage in amounts customarily maintained by similar businesses or as they may be required by applicable law. The covenants for the notes require us to keep all of our insurable properties insured against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value. We have an insurance policy that has no terrorism exclusion, except for non-certified nuclear, chemical and biological acts of terrorism. Our financial condition and results of operations are subject to the risks associated with acts of terrorism and the potential for uninsured losses as the result of any such acts. Effective November 26, 2002, under this existing coverage, any losses caused by certified acts of terrorism would be partially reimbursed by the United States under a formula established by federal law. Under this formula, the United States pays 85% of covered terrorism losses exceeding the statutorily established deductible paid by the insurance provider, and insurers pay 10% until aggregate insured losses from all insurers reach $100 billion in a calendar year. If the aggregate amount of insured losses under this program exceeds $100 billion during the applicable period for all insured and insurers combined, then each insurance provider will not be liable for payment of any amount which exceeds the aggregate amount of $100 billion. On January 12, 2015, theDecember 20, 2019, The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 20152019 was signed into law, and extendedextending the program through December 31, 2020.2027.
NOTE 6:7: NOTES PAYABLE
Our unsecured notes and term loans outstanding as of December 31, 20172023 and 2022 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Effective | | December 31, | | Payoff Date/ |
| Coupon/Stated Rate | | Rate (1) | | 2023 | | 2022 | | Maturity Date (2) |
| 2018 Term Loan | 1 Month LIBOR + 110 basis points | | 2.31 | % | | $ | — | | | $ | 100,000 | | | 1/10/2023 |
| 2023 Term Loan | 1 Month SOFR + 95 basis points | | 4.73 | % | | 125,000 | | | — | | | 1/10/2025 |
| 30-Year Unsecured Notes | 7.25 | % | | 7.36 | % | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 2/25/2028 |
| Green Bonds | 3.44 | % | | 4.09 | % | | 350,000 | | | 350,000 | | | 12/29/2030 |
| Total principal | | | | | 525,000 | | | 500,000 | | | |
| Premiums and discounts, net | | | | (94) | | | (116) | | | |
| Deferred issuance costs, net | | | | (2,561) | | | (2,525) | | | |
| Total | | | | $ | 522,345 | | | $ | 497,359 | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Coupon/Stated Rate | | Effective Rate (1) | | Principal Amount | | Maturity Date (2) |
| 10 Year Unsecured Notes | 4.95 | % | | 5.05 | % | | $ | 250,000 |
| | 10/1/2020 |
| 2015 Term Loan | 1 Month LIBOR + 110 basis points |
| | 2.72 | % | | 150,000 |
| | 3/15/2021 |
| 10 Year Unsecured Notes | 3.95 | % | | 4.02 | % | | 300,000 |
| | 10/15/2022 |
| 2016 Term Loan | 1 Month LIBOR + 165 basis points |
| | 2.86 | % | | 150,000 |
| | 7/21/2023 |
| 30 Year Unsecured Notes | 7.25 | % | | 7.36 | % | | 50,000 |
| | 2/25/2028 |
| Total principal | | | | | 900,000 |
| | |
| Premiums and discounts, net | | | | (1,580 | ) | | |
| Deferred issuance costs, net | | | | | (4,062 | ) | | |
| Total | | | | | $ | 894,358 |
| | |
(1) For fixed rate notes, the effective rate represents the yield on issuance date, including the effects of discounts on the notes. For variable rate notes, the effective rate represents the rate as fixed by interest rate derivatives (see note 7)8).
(2) No principal amounts are due prior to maturity.
During 2023, we executed a $125.0 million unsecured term loan ("2023 Term Loan") with an interest rate of SOFR (subject to a credit spread adjustment of 10 basis points) plus a margin of 95 basis points (subject to adjustment depending on Elme Communities’ credit rating). The 2023 Term Loan has a two-year term ending in January 2025, with two one year extension options. We used the third quarterproceeds to prepay the 2018 Term Loan in full and a portion of 2016,our borrowings under our unsecured credit facility.
In August 2021, we redeemed $300.0 million of our existing unsecured notes that were scheduled to mature in 2022. As a result of the prepayment, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $12.3 million comprised of a prepayment penalty of $11.9 million and the write-off of unamortized loan origination costs of $0.4 million.
On September 29, 2020, we entered into a seven year, $150.0note purchase agreement to issue $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.44% senior unsecured term loan ("2016 Term Loan"10-year notes payable (the “Green Bonds”) maturing on July 21, 2023 with a deferred draw period of up to six months commencing on July 22, 2016. The 2016 Term Loan bears interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45% or the base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.5% to 1.45% (in each case depending upon Washington REIT’s credit rating). The baseeffective interest rate isunder the highestGreen Bonds, including amortization of the administrative agent's primeassociated interest rate swaps (see note 8), is 4.09%. The closing and full funding of the federal funds rate plus 0.50%Green Bonds occurred on December 17, 2020. We incurred $2.6 million of debt issuance costs associated with the Green Bonds which are reported on our consolidated balance sheets as an offset to their related debt. The Green Bonds are senior unsecured obligations of Elme Communities and rank equal in right to payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of Elme Communities.
The proceeds of the sale of the Green Bonds were used to finance or refinance recently completed and future green building and energy efficiency, sustainable water and wastewater management and renewable energy projects.
The note purchase agreement contains customary financial covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio, a maximum secured leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and a maximum unencumbered leverage ratio. The note purchase agreement also contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of Elme Communities and its subsidiaries to enter into transactions with affiliates, consolidate or merge or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets, create liens, make dividends and distributions if an event of default exists, or substantially change the general nature of our business. Such financial and restrictive covenants are substantially similar to the corresponding covenants contained in our Credit Agreement.
The note purchase agreement also contains customary events of default, including payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of certain covenants and bankruptcy events. In the case of an event of default, we will generally be prohibited from paying any dividends, subject to certain exceptions including payment of dividends necessary to maintain REIT status, and the daily one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.0%. The 2016 Term Loan bears interestPurchasers may, among other remedies, accelerate the payment of all obligations. In the event of a change in control of Elme Communities, we must offer to prepay the Green Bonds at a rate of one month LIBOR plus 165 basis points, based on Washington REIT's current unsecured debt ratings. We borrowed $100.0 million on the term loan in the fourth quarter of 2016, and borrowed the remaining $50.0 million in January 2017. We also entered into forward interest rate derivatives commencing on March 31, 2017 to effectively fix the interest rate on the 2016 Term Loan at 2.86% (see note 7).par.
The required principal payments on the unsecured notes and term loans as of December 31, 20172023 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2018 | $ | — |
|
| 2019 | — |
|
| 2020 | 250,000 |
|
| 2021 | 150,000 |
|
| 2022 | 300,000 |
|
| Thereafter | 200,000 |
|
| | $ | 900,000 |
|
| | | | | |
| 2024 | $ | — | |
| 2025 | 125,000 | |
| 2026 | — | |
| 2027 | — | |
| 2028 | 50,000 | |
| Thereafter | 350,000 | |
| $ | 525,000 | |
Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually, except for the term loans,loan, for which interest is payable monthly. These notes contain certain financial and non-financial covenants, all of which we have met as of December 31, 2017.2023. Included in these covenants is the requirement to maintain a minimum level of unencumbered assets, as well as limits on our total indebtedness, secured indebtedness and required debt service payments.
NOTE 7:8: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
On September 15, 2015,We had one interest rate swap arrangement with a notional amount of $100.0 million that had effectively fixed the remaining $100.0 million portion of the 2018 Term Loan prior to the prepayment. During the first quarter of 2023, we prepaid the 2018 Term Loan using proceeds from the $125.0 million 2023 Term Loan (see note 7). Subsequent to this transaction, our interest rate swap arrangement effectively fixed the interest rate on a $100.0 million portion of the 2023 Term Loan through the interest rate swap arrangement’s expiration date of July 21, 2023.
During the first quarter of 2023, we entered into two interest rate swap arrangements with a totalan aggregate notional amount of $150.0$125.0 million to swapthat effectively fixed the floating interest rate underat 4.73% for the 20152023 Term Loan (see note 6) to an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.72% starting on October 15, 2015 and extending until the maturity of the 2015 Term Loan on March 15, 2021. On July 22, 2016, we entered into two forward interest rate swap arrangements with a total notional amount of $150.0 million to swap the floating interest rate under the 2016 Term Loan (see note 6) to an all-in fixed interest rate of 2.86%, starting on March 31, 2017 and extending until the maturity of the 2016 Term Loanbeginning on July 21, 2023.2023 through the 2023 Term Loan’s maturity date of January 10, 2025.
The interest rate swaps qualify as cash flow hedges and areswap arrangement is recorded at fair value in accordance with GAAP, based on discounted cash flow methodologies and observable inputs. We record the effective portion of changes in fair value of the cash flow hedgeshedge in otherOther comprehensive income (loss). The resulting unrealized loss on the effective portions of the cash flow hedges was the only activity in other comprehensive income (loss) during the periods presented in our consolidated financial statements. We assess the effectiveness of oura cash flow hedgeshedge both at inception and on an ongoing basis. TheIf a cash flow hedge is no longer expected to be effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. Hedge ineffectiveness of our cash flow hedges were effective for 2017 and 2016 and hedge ineffectiveness did not impact earningsis recorded in 2017 and 2016.earnings.
The fair values of the interest rate swapsswap as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016, are2022, were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Aggregate
Notional
Amount | Effective Date | | Fair Value |
| | Derivative Liabilities | |
| | December 31, | |
| Derivative Instrument | Maturity Date | 2023 | | 2022 | |
| Interest rate swap | $ | 100,000 | | March 31, 2017 | July 21, 2023 | $ | — | | | $ | 1,998 | | |
| Interest rate swap | 75,000 | | July 21, 2023 | January 10, 2025 | 740 | | | — | | |
| Interest rate swap | 50,000 | | July 21, 2023 | January 10, 2025 | 494 | | | — | | |
| | | | $ | 1,234 | | | $ | 1,998 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Notional Amount | Effective Date | | Fair Value |
| | | Asset Derivatives |
| | | December 31, |
| Derivative Instrument | Maturity Date | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Interest rate swaps | $ | 150,000 |
| October 15, 2015 | March 15, 2021 | $ | 1,987 |
| | $ | 417 |
|
| Interest rate swaps | 150,000 |
| March 31, 2017 | July 21, 2023 | 7,432 |
| | 7,194 |
|
| | $ | 300,000 |
| | | $ | 9,419 |
| | $ | 7,611 |
|
We record interest rate swaps on our consolidated balance sheets with prepaid expenses and other assets when in a net asset position, and with accounts payable and other liabilities when in a net liability position. The current interest rate swaps have been effective since inception. The gains or losses on the effective swaps are recognized in other comprehensive income, (loss), as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ending December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Unrealized (gain) loss on interest rate hedges | $ | (764) | | | $ | 2,819 | | | $ | 3,673 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ending December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedges | $ | 1,808 |
| | $ | 8,161 |
| | $ | (550 | ) |
Amounts reported in accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss related to derivativeseffective cash flow hedges will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, we estimate that $1.1an additional $1.2 million related to our two outstanding interest rate swap arrangements will be reclassified as a decrease to interest expense.
The losses reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income into interest expense for the three years ended December 31, 2023, were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ending December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into interest expense | $ | 2,039 | | | $ | 2,039 | | | $ | 2,039 | |
During the next twelve months, we estimate that an additional $2.0 million related to the previously settled interest rate swap arrangements will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
We have agreements with each of our derivative counterparties that contain a provision whereby we could be declared in default on our derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to our default on the indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the fair valuesvalue of derivative assets, including accrued interest, was $1.2 million and we did not have any derivatives were in a net asset position of $9.4 million, including accrued
interest but excluding any adjustment for nonperformance risk.liability position. As of December 31, 2017,2023, we have not posted any collateral related to these agreements.
Derivative instruments expose us to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparty under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreement. We believe that we minimize our credit risk on these transactions by dealing with major, creditworthy financial institutions. We monitor the credit ratings of counterparties and our exposure to any single entity, thus minimizing our credit risk concentration.
NOTE 8:9: FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosures about the fair value measurements are required to be disclosed separately for each major category of assets and liabilities, as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs
The only assets or liabilities we had at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are the assets held in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP"), which primarily consists of investments in mutual funds, and the interest rate swaps (see note 7)8).
We base the valuations related to the SERP on assumptions derived from significant other observable inputs and accordingly these valuations fall into Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
The valuation of the interest rate swaps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each interest rate swap. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the interest rate swaps, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments (or receipts) and the discounted expected variable cash receipts (or payments). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments in the fair value measurements to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk. These credit valuation adjustments were concluded to not be significant inputs for the fair value calculations for the periods presented. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as the posting of collateral, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. The valuation of interest rate swaps fallfalls into Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
The fair values of these assets and liabilities at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2023 | | December 31, 2022 |
| | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) | | Fair Value | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| SERP | $ | 1,858 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,858 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,407 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,407 |
| | $ | — |
|
| SERP | |
| SERP | |
| Interest rate swaps | 9,419 |
| | — |
| | 9,419 |
| | — |
| | 7,611 |
| | — |
| | 7,611 |
| | — |
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. In the third quarter of 2023, we measured the fair value of Watergate 600 using Level 3 inputs as there was evidence of impairment (see note 3).
Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value
The following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by management using available market information and established valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow.flow models. Many of these estimates involve significant judgment. The estimated fair value disclosed may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have an effect on the estimated fair value amounts. In addition, fair value estimates are made at a point in time and thus, estimates of fair value subsequent to December 31,
2017 2023 may differ significantly from the amounts presented.
Below is a summary of significant methodologies used in estimating fair values and a schedule of fair values at December 31, 2017.2023.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash include cash and commercial paper with original maturities of less than 90 days, which are valued at the carrying value, which approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments (Level 1 inputs).
Notes Receivable
We acquired a note receivable ("2445 M Street note") in 2008 with the purchase of 2445 M Street. This note was repaid during the fourth quarter of 2017. Prior to its repayment, we estimated the fair value of the 2445 M Street note based on a discounted cash flow methodology using market discount rates (Level 3 inputs).
Debt
Mortgage notes payable consist of instruments in which certain of our real estate assets are used for collateral. We estimate the fair value of the mortgage notes payable by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads estimated through independent comparisons to real estate assets or loans with similar characteristics. LinesLine of credit payable consist of bank facilities which we use for various purposes including working capital, acquisition funding and capital improvements. The linesline of credit advances and term loans with floating interest rates are priced at a specified rate plus a spread. We estimate the market value based on a comparison of the spreads of the advances to market given the adjustable base rate. We estimate the fair value of the notes payable by discounting the contractual cash flows at a rate equal to the relevant treasury rates (with respect to the timing of each cash flow) plus credit spreads derived using the relevant securities’ market prices. We classify these fair value measurements as Level 3 as we use significant unobservable inputs and management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices.
As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Carrying
Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying
Value | | Fair Value |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,984 | | | $ | 5,984 | | | $ | 8,389 | | | $ | 8,389 | |
| Restricted cash | 2,554 | | | 2,554 | | | 1,463 | | | 1,463 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Line of credit payable | 157,000 | | | 157,000 | | | 55,000 | | | 55,000 | |
| Notes payable | 522,345 | | | 466,668 | | | 497,359 | | | 454,564 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 9,847 |
| | $ | 9,847 |
| | $ | 11,305 |
| | $ | 11,305 |
|
| Restricted cash | 2,776 |
| | 2,776 |
| | 6,317 |
| | 6,317 |
|
| 2445 M Street note receivable | — |
| | — |
| | 2,089 |
| | 2,173 |
|
| Mortgage notes payable | 95,141 |
| | 97,181 |
| | 148,540 |
| | 149,997 |
|
| Lines of credit payable | 166,000 |
| | 166,000 |
| | 120,000 |
| | 120,000 |
|
| Notes payable | 894,358 |
| | 931,377 |
| | 843,084 |
| | 873,516 |
|
NOTE 9: STOCK BASED10: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Washington REITElme Communities maintains short-term and long-term incentive plans that allow for stock-basedshare-based awards to officers and non-officer employees. Stock basedShare-based awards are provided to officers and non-officer employees, as well as trustees, under the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan which allows for awards in the form of restricted shares, restricted share units, options, and other awards up to an aggregate of 2,400,000 shares over the ten yearten-year period in which the plan will be in effect. Restricted share units are converted into shares of our stock upon full vesting through the issuance of new shares. There were no options issued or outstanding as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016.2022.
Short-Term Incentive Plan ("STIP")
Under the STIP, executive officers earn awards, payable 50% in cash and 50% in restricted shares, based on a percentage of salary and an achievement rating subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee ofOn February 14, 2020, the board of trustees in considerationadopted an Amended and Restated Executive Officer Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Officer STIP”) and an Amended and Restated Executive Officer Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Officer LTIP”). Upon adoption by the board of varioustrustees, both plans became effective for the performance conditions and other subjective factors during a one-yearperiods beginning January 1, 2020.
Officer STIP
Under the Officer STIP, as revised, all named executive officers will have the opportunity to receive an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of certain performance measures that will be established for each performance period. WithEach year, the Compensation Committee will establish the threshold, target and high performance goals for each performance measure, as well as the weighting attributable to each such performance measure, with the aggregate weighting for all such performance measures to total 100%. Such performance measures will consist of one or more financial performance measures and, if determined by the Compensation Committee, individual performance measures.
Upon or following completion of a performance period, the degree of achievement of each performance measure will be determined by the Compensation Committee. The degree of achievement of any individual financial performance measures will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion with respect to the 50% of
Chief Executive Officer, and by the STIP award payableChief Executive Officer or other immediate supervisor in restricted shares,his or her discretion with respect to all other participants (subject to final approval by the restricted shares will vest over a three-year period commencing on the January 1 following the end of the one-year performance period. Prior to the adoption of the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan, stock based awards to officers, non-officer employeesCompensation Committee), and trustees were issued under the Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2007 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan which allowed for awards in the form of restricted shares, restricted share units, options and other awards up to an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares while the plan was in effect.
The grant date for the 50% of the STIP award payable in restricted shares is the date on which the Compensation Committee approveswill evaluate the STIP awards. We recognize compensation expense on this 50% when the grant date occurs at the enddegree of achievement of the one-yearindividual performance measures on a scale of below 1 (below threshold), 1 (threshold), 2 (target) or 3 (high) or any fractional number between 1 and 3.
Each participant’s total award under the Officer STIP with respect to a performance period throughwill be stated as a percentage of the three-year vestingparticipant’s annual base salary determined as of the first day of that performance period, which percentage will depend upon the participant’s position and the degree of achievement of threshold, target, and high performance goals for the performance period. The percentages for the performance period beginning January 1, 2023 are as set forth in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Threshold | Target | High |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | 63% | 125% | 188% |
| Chief Financial Officer | 41% | 75% | 133% |
Chief Operating Officer (1) | 23% | 45% | 76% |
| Chief Information Officer | 35% | 65% | 115% |
Chief Administrative Officer (1) | 28% | 54% | 96% |
(1) For both the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer, the percentages include the effects of prorations for the amount of time in 2023 that they were in their respective positions.
If a Change in Control (as defined in the Officer STIP) occurs during a performance period while the participant is employed, the participant will receive a prorated award under the Officer STIP calculated based on the actual levels of achievement of the prorated performance goals as of the date of the Change in Control.
Bonuses payable under the short-term incentive plans for non-executive officers and staff are payable 100% in cash.
Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP")Officer LTIP
Under the Officer LTIP, as revised, all named executive officers earnwill have the opportunity to receive awards payable, 75% in unrestricted shares and 25% in restricted shares, based on a percentage of salary and(i) the achievement of certain market conditions. LTIP performance is evaluated based 50% on absolutemeasures, which will be established for each performance period, and (ii) continued employment with the Company. The aggregate weighting for the performance measures and the time-based measures, as determined by the Compensation Committee, will total 100%. The performance measures will consist of one or more shareholder return (“TSR”)measures and 50% on relative TSR over a three-year evaluation period with a new three-year period initiatingone or more strategic measures. The awards earned under the existing plan each year. The officers'Officer LTIP, if any, are payable in our common shares of beneficial interest. Each participant’s total award opportunities under the Officer LTIP with respect to a performance period will be stated as a percentage of the participant’s annual base salary ranges from 80%determined as of the beginning of that performance period. The percentages for the performance period beginning January 1, 2023 are as set forth in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Threshold | Target | High |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | 198% | 275% | 440% |
| Chief Financial Officer | 95% | 135% | 196% |
Chief Operating Officer (1) | 110% | 157% | 231% |
| Chief Information Officer | 100% | 143% | 207% |
Chief Administrative Officer (1) | 65% | 92% | 134% |
(1) For both the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer, the percentages include the effects of prorations for the amount of time in 2023 that they were in their respective positions.
Any time-based awards under the Officer LTIP will be subject to 150% at target level.a three-year vesting schedule, with any award vesting in one-third increments on December 15 of each year of the applicable performance period if the participant remains employed by the Company on each of such dates. The unrestricted sharesOfficer LTIP provides that following a performance period, 100% of any performance-based award will vest immediately atupon grant.
Each year, the endCompensation Committee will establish the threshold, target and high performance goals for each performance measure. Upon or following completion of a performance period, the degree of achievement of each performance measure will be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.
If a Change in Control (as defined in the Officer LTIP) occurs during a performance period while the participant is employed, the Officer LTIP provides that all time-based awards which are unvested will become vested, and the participant will receive a pro-rated portion of the three-year performance period,shareholder return measure-based awards and the restricted shares vest over a one-year period commencing on the January 1 following the end of the three-year performance period. In addition, during the transition period from the prior LTIP in 2014, the board of trustees awarded similar transitionstrategic measure-based awards with defined performance periods of one and two years and modified vesting to account for the transition.will be calculated at target.
We recognize compensation expense ratably (over three years for the 75% unrestricted shares and over four years for the 25% restricted shares) based on the grant date fair value, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, and regardless of whether the market conditions are achieved and the awards ultimately vest.
We use a binomial model which employs the Monte Carlo method as of the grant date to determine the fair value of the officerOfficer LTIP awards. TheFor three-year performance periods commencing on or after January 1, 2023, the market performance condition is based on total shareholder return relative to the FTSE Nareit Residential Index (60% weighting) and a defined population of peer companies (40% weighting). For three-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2022, the market condition performance measurement is based on total shareholder return relative to a defined population of peer companies (100% weighting). For three-year performance period commencing on both an absolute basis (50% weighting) andJanuary 1, 2021, the market condition performance measurement is based on total shareholder return relative to a defined population of peer companies (50% weighting), relative to the FTSE Nareit Residential Index (42.5% weighting) and the FTSE Office Index (7.5% weighting). The model evaluates the awards for changing total shareholder return over the term of the vesting, on an absolute basisrelative to the peer companies and relative to the peer companies,FTSE indexes, and uses random simulations that are based on past stock characteristics as well as dividend growth and other factors for Washington REITElme Communities and each of the peer companies.
The assumptions used to value the TSR portion of the officer LTIP awards were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Awards | | 2022 Awards | | 2021 Awards |
Expected volatility (1) | 32.3 | % | | 35.2 | % | | 35.5 | % |
Risk-free interest rate (2) | 4.2 | % | | 1.7 | % | | 0.3 | % |
Expected term (3) | 3 years | | 3 years | | 3 years |
| Share price at grant date | $19.04 | | $24.54 | | $ | 23.20 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2017 Awards | | 2016 Awards | | 2015 Awards |
Expected volatility (1) | 18.5% - 18.7% |
| | 18.2 | % | | 17.2% - 17.5% |
Risk-free interest rate (2) | 1.5 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 1.0% - 1.1% |
Expected term (3) | 3 and 4 years |
| | 3 and 4 years |
| | 3 and 4 years |
| Share price at grant date | $30.84 - $32.69 |
| | $27.06 | | $27.66 - $27.76 |
(1) Expected volatility based upon historical volatility of our daily closing share price.
(2) Risk-free interest rate based on U.S. treasury constant maturity bonds on the measurement date with a maturity equal to the market condition performance period.
(3) Expected term based on the market condition performance period.
The calculated grant date fair value as a percentage of base salary for the officers for the three-year performance period that commenced in 20172023 ranged from approximately 37%27% to 67%137% for the 50%60% of the LTIP based on TSR relative TSRto the FTSE Nareit Residential Index and from 13%approximately 32% to 31%159% for the 50%40% of the LTIP based on absolute TSR.TSR relative to a defined population of peer companies.
The calculated grant date fair value as a percentage of base salary for the officers for the three-year performance period that commenced in 20162022 ranged from approximately 38%32% to 66%248% for the 50%100% of the LTIP based on TSR relative TSR and from 17% to 30% for the 50%a defined population of the LTIP based on absolute TSR.peer companies.
The calculated grant date fair value as a percentage of base salary for the officers for the three-year performance period that commenced in 20152021 ranged from approximately 40%37% to 69%78% for the 50% of the LTIP based on TSR relative TSRto a defined population of peer companies and from 13%38% to 29%80% for the 50% of the LTIP based on absolute TSR.TSR relative to the FTSE Nareit Diversified Index.
During 2017,2022, our chief executive officer was granted a one-time equity award of 100,000 restricted shares. None of the restricted shares vest until the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the grant date or when our chief executive officer become retirement-eligible, at which time 100% of the restricted shares will vest, subject to Mr.
McDermott's continued employment with Washington REITElme Communities until such vesting date.
Our non-executive officers and other employees earn restricted share unit awards under a long-term incentive plan for non-executive officers and staff which became effective on January 1, 2016, based upon various percentages of their salaries and annual performance calculations. The restricted share unit awards vest ratably over three years frombeginning on the December 15 precedingfollowing the grant date based upon continued employment. For awards made through 2016, the service inception date precedes the grant date. For these awards, we initially measured compensation expense for awards with performance conditions at fair value at the service inception date based on probability of payout, and we remeasured compensation expense at subsequent reporting dates until all of the award's key terms and conditions are known and the grant date is established. We recognized compensation expense for these awards according to a graded vesting schedule over the four-year requisite service period. During 2016, we amended the LTIP for other officers and other employees. Among the changes to the LTIP was the inclusion of strategic goals with subjective performance criteria. As a result of these changes, the service inception date is the same as the grant date for awards made under the amended LTIP. We recognize compensation expense for these awards according to a graded vesting schedule over the three-year requisite service period.
Restricted share awards made to retirement-eligible employees fully vest on the grant date. Employees are considered retirement-eligible when they are both over the age of 55 and have been employed by Washington REITElme Communities for at least 20 years, or over the age of 65. We fully recognize compensation expense for such awards as of the grant date.
Trustee Awards
We award share based compensation to our trustees in the form of restricted shares which vest immediately and are restricted from sale for the period of the trustees' service. The value of share-based compensation for each trustee was $100,000 for each of three years ended December 31, 2017.2023.
Total Compensation Expense
Total compensation expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements for each of the three years ended December 31, 20172023 for all share based awards was $4.8$5.5 million, $3.5$8.0 million and $5.1$8.6 million, respectively, net of capitalized stock-basedshare-based compensation expense of $0.1 million, $0.2 million $0.1 million and $0.6$0.3 million, respectively.
Restricted Share Awards with Performance and Service Conditions
The activity for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 related to our restricted share awards, excluding those subject to market conditions, was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Fair Value |
| Unvested at December 31, 2020 | 306,995 | | | $ | 30.96 | |
| Granted | 238,134 | | | 23.53 | |
| Vested during year | (277,967) | | | 26.39 | |
| Forfeited | (7,467) | | | 26.73 | |
| Unvested at December 31, 2021 | 259,695 | | | 29.16 | |
| Granted | 408,606 | | | 22.33 | |
| Vested during year | (408,118) | | | 27.13 | |
| Forfeited | (17,814) | | | 25.31 | |
| Unvested at December 31, 2022 | 242,369 | | | 21.35 | |
| Granted | 410,928 | | | 18.40 | |
| Vested during year | (367,109) | | | 19.79 | |
| Forfeited | (28,453) | | | 20.85 | |
| Unvested at December 31, 2023 | 257,735 | | | 18.89 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Wtd Avg Grant Fair Value |
| Unvested at December 31, 2014 | 93,667 |
| | $ | 25.22 |
|
| Granted | 251,642 |
| | 27.80 |
|
| Vested during year | (212,856 | ) | | 27.18 |
|
| Forfeited | (26,309 | ) | | 26.77 |
|
| Unvested at December 31, 2015 | 106,144 |
| | 27.71 |
|
| Granted | 251,694 |
| | 26.01 |
|
| Vested during year | (211,771 | ) | | 29.21 |
|
| Forfeited | (38,368 | ) | | 26.14 |
|
| Unvested at December 31, 2016 | 107,699 |
| | 26.47 |
|
| Granted | 330,639 |
| | 32.46 |
|
| Vested during year | (194,569 | ) | | 30.50 |
|
| Forfeited | (7,075 | ) | | 27.43 |
|
| Unvested at December 31, 2017 | 236,694 |
| | 27.96 |
|
The total fair value of share grants vested for each of the three years ended December 31, 20172023 was $5.9$7.3 million, $6.2$11.1 million and $5.8$7.6 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017,2023, the total compensation cost related to non-vested share awards not yet recognized was $6.6$4.2 million,
which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of 3525 months.
Restricted and Unrestricted Shares with Market Conditions
Stock basedShare-based awards with market conditions under the LTIP were grantedawarded in 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 with fair market values, as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation, as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Awards (1) | | 2022 Awards (1) | | | | 2021 Awards (1) |
| Relative Peer TSR | $ | 831 | | | $ | 1,480 | | | | | $ | 951 | |
Absolute/Index TSR (2) | 1,048 | | N/A | | | | 971 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Grant Date Fair Value |
| | 2017 Awards | | 2016 Awards | | 2015 Awards |
| | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Restricted | | Unrestricted |
| Relative TSR | $ | 222 |
| | $ | 666 |
| | $ | 182 |
| | $ | 546 |
| | $ | 191 |
| | $ | 634 |
|
| Absolute TSR | 100 |
| | 299 |
| | 82 |
| | 246 |
| | 76 |
| | 254 |
|
The unamortized value of these awards with market conditions as of December 31, 20172023 was as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 Awards (1) | | 2022 Awards (1) | | | | 2021 Awards (1) |
| Relative Peer TSR | $ | 592 | | | $ | 385 | | | | | $ | — | |
Absolute/Index TSR (2) | 743 | | N/A | | | | — | |
______________________________
(1) The 2023, 2022 and 2021 Awards were granted under the Officer LTIP, whereby all of the shares vest immediately at the end of the three-year performance period.
(2) The performance conditions for the 2023 awards were evaluated based on 60% on TSR relative to the FTSE Nareit Residential Index and 40% based on TSR relative to a defined populations of peer companies. The performance conditions for the 2022 awards were evaluated based on 100% on TSR relative to a defined population of peer companies. The performance conditions for the 2021 awards were evaluated based on 50% on TSR relative to a defined population of peer companies and 50% on TSR relative to the FTSE Multifamily and Office indexes.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 Awards | | 2016 Awards | | 2015 Awards |
| | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Restricted | | Unrestricted | | Restricted | | Unrestricted |
| Relative TSR | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 444 |
| | $ | 117 |
| | $ | 314 |
| | $ | 83 |
| | $ | 165 |
|
| Absolute TSR | 75 |
| | 199 |
| | 53 |
| | 142 |
| | 33 |
| | 66 |
|
NOTE 10:11: OTHER BENEFIT PLANS
We have a Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which permits all eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation in accordance with the Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, we may make discretionary contributions on behalf of eligible employees. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2017,2023, we made contributions to the 401(k) plan of $0.4$0.6 million, $0.4$0.3 million and $0.5$0.4 million, respectively.
We have adopted non-qualified deferred compensation plans for the officers and members of the board of trustees. The plans allow for a deferral of a percentage of annual cash compensation and trustee fees. The plans are unfunded, and payments are to be made out of the general assets of Washington REIT.Elme Communities. The deferred compensation liability was $1.0$0.1 million and $0.9$0.2 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.
In November 2005, the board of trustees approved the establishment of a SERP for the benefit of officers. This is a defined contribution plan under which, upon a participant's termination of employment from Washington REITElme Communities for any reason other than discharge for cause, the participant will be entitled to receive a benefit equal to the participant's accrued benefit times the participant's vested interest. We account for this plan in accordance with ASC 710-10 and ASC 320-10, whereby the investments are reported at fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are included in earnings. At December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the accrued benefit liability was $1.8$2.0 million and $1.3$2.1 million, respectively. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2017,2023, we recognized current service cost of $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.3$0.2 million, respectively.
NOTE 11:12: EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
We determine “Basic earnings per share” using the two-class method as our unvested restricted share awards and units have non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are therefore considered participating securities. We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to the controlling interest less the allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
We also determine “Diluted earnings per share” as the more dilutive of the two-class method or the treasury stock method with respect to the unvested restricted share awards. We further evaluate any other potentially dilutive securities at the end of the period and adjust the basic earnings per share calculation for the impact of those securities that are dilutive. Our dilutive earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive impact of operating partnership units under the if-converted method and our share based awards with performance conditions prior to the grant date and all market condition awards under the contingently issuable method.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 was as follows (in thousands;thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| Loss from continuing operations | $ | (52,977) | | | $ | (30,868) | | | $ | (53,140) | |
| | | | | |
| Allocation of earnings to unvested restricted share awards | (255) | | | (232) | | | (393) | |
| Adjusted loss from continuing operations | (53,232) | | | (31,100) | | | (53,533) | |
| Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale of real estate | — | | | — | | | 69,524 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Adjusted net (loss) income | $ | (53,232) | | | $ | (31,100) | | | $ | 15,991 | |
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted | 87,735 | | | 87,388 | | | 84,544 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Earnings per common share, basic: | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (0.63) | |
| Discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | 0.82 | |
Basic net (loss) income per common share (1) | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | 0.19 | |
| Earnings per common share, diluted: | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | (0.63) | |
| Discontinued operations | — | | | — | | | 0.82 | |
Diluted net (loss) income per common share (1) | $ | (0.61) | | | $ | (0.36) | | | $ | 0.19 | |
| | | | | |
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.72 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 0.94 | |
(1) Earnings per share may not sum due to rounding
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Numerator: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 19,612 |
| | $ | 119,288 |
| | $ | 89,187 |
|
| Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 56 |
| | 51 |
| | 553 |
|
| Allocation of undistributed earnings to unvested restricted share awards and units to continuing operations | (362 | ) | | (310 | ) | | (269 | ) |
| Adjusted net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 19,306 |
| | $ | 119,029 |
| | $ | 89,471 |
|
| Denominator: | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 76,820 |
| | 72,163 |
| | 68,177 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
| Operating partnership units | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Employee stock options and restricted share awards | 106 |
| | 176 |
| | 133 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 76,935 |
| | 72,339 |
| | 68,310 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Basic net income attributable to the controlling interests per common share | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
|
| Diluted net income attributable to the controlling interests per common share | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Dividends declared per common share | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
|
NOTE 12: RENTALS UNDER OPERATING LEASES
As of December 31, 2017, non-cancelable commercial operating leases provide for minimum rental income were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2018 | $ | 190,391 |
|
| 2019 | 172,289 |
|
| 2020 | 157,694 |
|
| 2021 | 132,150 |
|
| 2022 | 109,713 |
|
| Thereafter | 376,904 |
|
| | $ | 1,139,141 |
|
Apartment leases are not included as the terms are generally for one year. Most of these commercial leases increase in future years based on agreed-upon percentages or in some instances, changes in the Consumer Price Index.
Real estate tax, operating expense and common area maintenance reimbursement income from continuing operations for the three years ended December 31, 2017 was $35.4 million, $35.2 million and $34.6 million, respectively.
NOTE 13: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Development Commitments
At December 31, 2017,2023, we had no committed contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with our development and redevelopment projects.
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings, lawsuits, examinations by various tax authorities and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the resolution of any such current matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 14: SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate in a single reportable segment which includes the ownership, development, redevelopment and acquisition of apartment communities. Within the residential segment, we do not distinguish or group our consolidated operations based on size (only one community, Riverside Apartments, comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues), type (all assets in the segment are residential) or geography (all but six communities are within the Washington, DC metro region). Further, our apartment communities have similar long-term economic characteristics and provide similar products and services to our residents. As a result, our operating properties are aggregated into a single reportable segment: residential.
Prior to the end of the second quarter of 2021, we had two reportable segments: office and residential. During the third quarter of 2021, we closed on the sales of the Office Portfolio and the Retail Portfolio (see note 3), and following such sales, we have one remaining office property, Watergate 600, which does not meet the criteria for a reportable segment and has been classified within “Other” on our segment disclosure tables.
We evaluate performance based upon net operating income ("NOI") of the combined properties in the segment. Our reportable operating segment consolidates similar properties. GAAP requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing each segment’s performance. NOI is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss and is defined as real estate performance and allocate resources by property type and have three reportable segments: office, multifamily, and retail. Office properties provide office space for various types of businesses and professions. Multifamily properties provide rental housing for individuals and families throughout the Washington metro region. Retail properties are typically grocery store anchored neighborhood centers that include other small shop tenants or regional power centers with several junior box tenants.revenue less real estate expenses.
Real estate rental revenue as a percentage of the total for each of the reportable operating segments in continuing operations for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Multifamily | 92 | % | | 91 | % | | 89 | % |
| Other | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | 11 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Office | 52 | % | | 53 | % | | 57 | % |
| Multifamily | 29 | % | | 27 | % | | 22 | % |
| Retail | 19 | % | | 20 | % | | 21 | % |
The percentage of income producing real estate assets classified as held and used, at cost, for each of the reportable operating segments in continuing operations as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| Multifamily | 96 | % | | 92 | % |
| Other | 4 | % | | 8 | % |
|
| | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Office | 50 | % | | 50 | % |
| Multifamily | 33 | % | | 33 | % |
| Retail | 17 | % | | 17 | % |
The accounting policies of each of the segments are the same as those described in note 2.
We evaluate performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in each segment. Our reportable operating segments are consolidations of similar properties. GAAP requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segments’ performance. Net operating income is a key measurement of our segment profit and loss. Net operating income is defined as segment real estate rental revenue less segment real estate expenses.
The following tables present revenues, net operating income, capital expenditures and total assets for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 from these segments, and reconciles net operating income of reportable segments to net (loss) income attributable to the controlling interests as reported (in thousands):
| | | | Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2023 |
| | Office | | Retail | | Multifamily | | Corporate
and Other | | Consolidated | | Residential | | Other (1) | | Consolidated |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 167,438 |
| | $ | 62,390 |
| | $ | 95,250 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 325,078 |
|
| Real estate expenses | 62,824 |
| | 15,186 |
| | 37,640 |
| | — |
| | 115,650 |
|
| Net operating income | $ | 104,614 |
| | $ | 47,204 |
| | $ | 57,610 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 209,428 |
|
| Property management expenses | |
| General and administrative expenses | |
| Transformation costs | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | (112,056 | ) |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | | (22,580 | ) |
| Interest expense | | | | | | | | | (47,534 | ) |
| | Loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | 507 |
|
| Gain on sale of real estate | | | | | | | | | 24,915 |
|
| Real estate impairment | | | | | | | | | (33,152 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | | 84 |
|
| Net income | | | | | | | | | 19,612 |
|
| Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | 56 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | | | | | | | | | $ | 19,668 |
|
| | Net loss | |
| | Net loss | |
| | Net loss | |
| | Capital expenditures | |
| | Capital expenditures | |
| | Capital expenditures | $ | 30,407 |
| | $ | 2,128 |
| | $ | 27,980 |
| | $ | 3,866 |
| | $ | 64,381 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,203,187 |
| | $ | 346,580 |
| | $ | 767,279 |
| | $ | 42,380 |
| | $ | 2,359,426 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2022 |
| | Residential | | Other (1) | | Consolidated |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 190,500 | | | 18,880 | | | $ | 209,380 | |
| Real estate expenses | 68,735 | | | 5,266 | | | 74,001 | |
| Net operating income | $ | 121,765 | | | $ | 13,614 | | | $ | 135,379 | |
| Property management expenses | | | | | (7,436) | |
| General and administrative expenses | | | | | (28,258) | |
| Transformation costs | | | | | (9,686) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | (91,722) | |
| | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | | | (24,940) | |
| | | | | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | | | | (4,917) | |
| Other income | | | | | 712 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | $ | (30,868) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | $ | 35,081 | | | $ | 3,175 | | | $ | 38,256 | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,691,176 | | | $ | 181,430 | | | $ | 1,872,606 | |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2021 |
| | Office | | Retail | | Multifamily | | Corporate and Other | | Consolidated | | Residential | | Other (1), (2) | | Consolidated |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 165,934 |
| | $ | 61,566 |
| | $ | 85,764 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 313,264 |
|
| Real estate expenses | 64,405 |
| | 15,860 |
| | 34,748 |
| | — |
| | 115,013 |
|
| Net operating income | $ | 101,529 |
| | $ | 45,706 |
| | $ | 51,016 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 198,251 |
|
| Property management expenses | |
| General and administrative expenses | |
| Transformation costs | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | (108,406 | ) |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | | (19,545 | ) |
| Casualty gain | | | | | | | | | 676 |
|
| Acquisition costs | | | | | | | | | (1,178 | ) |
| | Interest expense | | | | | | | | | (53,126 | ) |
| | Interest expense | |
| | Interest expense | |
| Loss on interest rate derivatives | |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | 297 |
|
| | Discontinued operations: | |
| | Discontinued operations: | |
| | Discontinued operations: | |
| Income from properties sold or held for sale | |
| Income from properties sold or held for sale | |
| Income from properties sold or held for sale | |
| Gain on sale of real estate | | | | | | | | | 101,704 |
|
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | | 615 |
|
| | Net income | | | | | | | | | 119,288 |
|
| Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | 51 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | | | | | | | | | $ | 119,339 |
|
| | Net income | |
| | Net income | |
| | Capital expenditures | |
| | Capital expenditures | |
| | Capital expenditures | $ | 30,337 |
| | $ | 8,821 |
| | $ | 17,936 |
| | $ | 920 |
| | $ | 58,014 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,104,589 |
| | $ | 352,056 |
| | $ | 762,695 |
| | $ | 34,279 |
| | $ | 2,253,619 |
|
(1) Other represents Watergate 600, an office property that does not meet the qualitative or quantitative criteria for a reportable segment.
(2) Total capital expenditures include office and retail properties classified as discontinued operations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
| | Office | | Retail | | Multifamily | | Corporate
and Other | | Consolidated |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 174,378 |
| | $ | 63,507 |
| | $ | 68,542 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 306,427 |
|
| Real estate expenses | 67,228 |
| | 15,606 |
| | 29,400 |
| | — |
| | 112,234 |
|
| Net operating income | $ | 107,150 |
| | $ | 47,901 |
| | $ | 39,142 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 194,193 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | (108,935 | ) |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | | (20,123 | ) |
| Real estate impairment | | | | | | | | | (5,909 | ) |
| Acquisition costs | | | | | | | | | (2,056 | ) |
| Interest expense | | | | | | | | | (59,546 | ) |
| Other income | | | | | | | | | 709 |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | | | | | | | | (119 | ) |
| Gain on sale of real estate | | | | | | | | | 91,107 |
|
| Income tax expense | | | | | | | | | (134 | ) |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | 89,187 |
|
| Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | | | | | | | 553 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | | | | | | | | | $ | 89,740 |
|
| Capital expenditures | $ | 29,745 |
| | $ | 3,897 |
| | $ | 7,865 |
| | $ | 2,129 |
| | $ | 43,636 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,265,570 |
| | $ | 354,123 |
| | $ | 529,773 |
| | $ | 41,702 |
| | $ | 2,191,168 |
|
NOTE 15: SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
While the Company previously owned a combination of commercial and residential assets, we disposed of all but one of our commercial assets in 2021. These commercial assets are classified as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2023.
Unaudited financial data by quarter in each of the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 were as follows (in thousands, except for per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter(1) |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| 2023 | | | | | | | |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 55,809 | | | $ | 56,599 | | | $ | 56,651 | | | $ | 58,852 | |
| Loss from continuing operations | $ | (3,643) | | | $ | (2,611) | | | $ | (43,618) | | | $ | (3,105) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (3,643) | | | $ | (2,611) | | | $ | (43,618) | | | $ | (3,105) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Loss from continuing operations per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | (0.03) | | | $ | (0.50) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Diluted | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | (0.03) | | | $ | (0.50) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Net loss per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | (0.03) | | | $ | (0.50) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Diluted | $ | (0.04) | | | $ | (0.03) | | | $ | (0.50) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| 2022 | | | | | | | |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 47,804 | | | $ | 51,380 | | | $ | 54,603 | | | $ | 55,593 | |
| Loss from continuing operations | $ | (7,724) | | | $ | (8,874) | | | $ | (10,739) | | | $ | (3,531) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net loss | $ | (7,724) | | | $ | (8,874) | | | $ | (10,739) | | | $ | (3,531) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Loss from continuing operations per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (0.09) | | | $ | (0.10) | | | $ | (0.12) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Diluted | $ | (0.09) | | | $ | (0.10) | | | $ | (0.12) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Net loss per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (0.09) | | | $ | (0.10) | | | $ | (0.12) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
| Diluted | $ | (0.09) | | | $ | (0.10) | | | $ | (0.12) | | | $ | (0.04) | |
______________________________
(1)With regard to per share calculations, the sum of the quarterly results may not equal full year results due to rounding.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter(1), (2) |
| | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| 2017 | | | | | | | |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 77,501 |
| | $ | 83,456 |
| | $ | 82,819 |
| | $ | 81,302 |
|
| Net income | $ | 6,615 |
| | $ | 7,847 |
| | $ | 2,813 |
| | $ | 2,337 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 6,634 |
| | $ | 7,864 |
| | $ | 2,833 |
| | $ | 2,337 |
|
| Net income per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
| 2016 | | | | | | | |
| Real estate rental revenue | $ | 77,137 |
| | $ | 79,405 |
| | $ | 79,770 |
| | $ | 76,952 |
|
| Net income | $ | 2,379 |
| | $ | 31,821 |
| | $ | 79,662 |
| | $ | 5,426 |
|
| Net income attributable to the controlling interests | $ | 2,384 |
| | $ | 31,836 |
| | $ | 79,674 |
| | $ | 5,445 |
|
| Net income per share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
|
| |
(1)
| With regard to per share calculations, the sum of the quarterly results may not equal full year results due to rounding. |
| |
(2)
| The fourth quarter of 2017 includes gain on sale of real estate classified as continuing operations of $24.9 million. The second and third quarters of 2016 include gains on sale of real estate classified as continuing operations of $24.1 million and $77.6 million, respectively. The third and fourth quarters of 2017 include real estate impairments of $5.0 million and $28.2 million, respectively. |
NOTE 16: SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
DuringOn October 26, 2023, the second quarterBoard authorized and approved a share repurchase program of 2016, we issued approximately 5.3up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common shares including 0.7 million shares issued pursuantof beneficial interest over a period of two years, subject to any applicable limitations or restrictions set forth in our existing credit facility and other debt agreements. The share repurchase program is scheduled to expire on October 25, 2025, unless extended by the underwriters' over-allotment option, at a price to the public of $28.20 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately $143.4 million.Board.
During the second quarter of 2015,On February 17, 2021, we entered into four separate amendments to each of our existing equity distribution agreements (collectively, the “Equity(“Original Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, Capital One Securities, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and RBC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and Truist Securities, Inc. (f/k/a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.), each dated May 4, 2018 (collectively, as amended, the “Equity Distribution Agreements”). Also on February 17, 2021, we entered into a separate equity distribution agreement with BTIG, LLC relatingon the same terms as the Amended Equity Distribution Agreements (the “BTIG Equity Distribution Agreement”). On September 22, 2021, BTIG, LLC notified us that it was terminating the BTIG Equity Distribution Agreement, effective as of September 27, 2021. Pursuant to the issuance and sale ofEquity Distribution Agreements, we may sell, from time to time, up to $200.0an aggregate price of $550.0 million of our common shares from time to time. Salesof beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share. Issuances of our common shares are made at market prices prevailing at the time of sale.issuance. We may use net proceeds from the saleissuance of common shares under this program for general corporatebusiness purposes, including, without limitation, working capital, the acquisition, renovation, expansion, improvement, development or redevelopment of income producing properties or the repayment of debt. During 2017Our issuances and 2016, we issued 3.6 million and 0.9 million common shares, respectively, undernet proceeds on the Equity Distribution Agreements at a weighted average price of $32.06in 2022 and $33.32 per share, respectively, raising $113.2 million2021 and $29.6 million in net proceeds, respectively.
Thethe Original Equity Distribution Agreements replace Washington REIT's prior sales agency financing agreement with BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC, which expired by its terms in June 2015. During 2015, Washington REIT issued 0.2 million common shares at a weighted average price of $28.34,2021 for net proceeds of $5.2 million.the three years ended December 31, 2023 were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Issuance of common shares | — | | | 1,032 | | | 1,636 | |
| Weighted average price per share | $ | — | | | $ | 26.27 | | | $ | 25.44 | |
| Net proceeds | $ | — | | | $ | 26,849 | | | $ | 40,462 | |
We have a dividend reinvestment program, whereby shareholders may use their dividends and optional cash payments to purchase common shares. The common shares sold under this program may either be common shares issued by us or common shares purchased in the open market. Net proceeds under this program are used for general corporate purposes. During
Our issuances and net proceeds on the 2017 and 2016, we issued approximately 80,000 and 23,000 common shares, respectively, under thisdividend reinvestment program at a weighted average price of $32.25 and $30.98for the three years ended December 31, 2023 were as follows (in thousands, except per share respectively, for net proceeds of $2.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively.data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Issuance of common shares | 28 | | | 47 | | | 75 | |
| Weighted average price per share | $ | 17.64 | | | $ | 22.40 | | | $ | 23.37 | |
| Net proceeds | $ | 497 | | | $ | 1,030 | | | $ | 1,744 | |
NOTE 17: DEFERRED COSTS
As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, deferred leasing costs and deferred leasing incentives were included in prepaid expenses and other assets as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2023 | | 2022 |
| | Gross Carrying
Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net | | Gross Carrying
Value | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred leasing costs | $ | 9,048 | | | $ | 5,537 | | | $ | 3,511 | | | $ | 8,992 | | | $ | 5,132 | | | $ | 3,860 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| Deferred leasing costs | $ | 68,213 |
| | $ | 28,523 |
| | $ | 39,690 |
| | $ | 58,391 |
| | $ | 22,748 |
| | $ | 35,643 |
|
| Deferred leasing incentives | 24,946 |
| | 11,114 |
| | 13,832 |
| | 21,157 |
| | 8,061 |
| | 13,096 |
|
Amortization, including write-offs, of deferred leasing costs and deferred leasing incentives from continuing operations for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| | | | | |
| Deferred leasing costs amortization | $ | 351 | | | $ | 406 | | | $ | 535 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Deferred leasing costs amortization | $ | 6,418 |
| | $ | 6,076 |
| | $ | 5,983 |
|
| Deferred leasing incentives amortization | 3,163 |
| | 2,994 |
| | 2,848 |
|
NOTE 18:SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 18, 2018, we closed on the purchase of Arlington Tower, a 398,000 square foot office building in Arlington, Virginia for a contract purchase price of $250.0 million. We funded the acquisition with borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from the sale of Braddock Metro Center (see note 3).
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 AND 20152021
(IN THOUSANDS)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Expenses | | Net Recoveries | | Balance at End of Year |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | | | | | | |
| 2023 | $ | 1,399 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,399 | |
| 2022 | $ | 1,392 | | | $ | 7 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,399 | |
| 2021 | $ | 1,402 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | 1,392 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Expenses | | Net Deductions (Recoveries) | | Balance at End of Year |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | $ | 2,377 |
| | $ | 882 |
| | $ | (833 | ) | | $ | 2,426 |
|
| 2016 | $ | 2,297 |
| | $ | 1,706 |
| | $ | (1,626 | ) | | $ | 2,377 |
|
| 2015 | $ | 3,392 |
| | $ | 1,368 |
| | $ | (2,463 | ) | | $ | 2,297 |
|
| Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | | | | | | |
| 2017 | $ | 2,882 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,469 | ) | | $ | 1,413 |
|
| 2016 | $ | 5,705 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,823 | ) | | $ | 2,882 |
|
| 2015 | $ | 5,714 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 5,705 |
|
SCHEDULE III
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Initial Cost (a) | | Net Improvements (Retirement) since Acquisition | | Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2023 | | Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2023 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total (c) | | Year of Construction | | Date of Acquisition | | | | | | Depreciation Life (d) |
| Residential Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3801 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | $ | 420,000 | | | $ | 2,678,000 | | | $ | 23,494,000 | | | $ | 420,000 | | | $ | 26,172,000 | | | $ | 26,592,000 | | | $ | 18,112,000 | | | 1951 | | Jan 1963 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Roosevelt Towers | | Virginia | | 336,000 | | | 1,996,000 | | | 14,761,000 | | | 336,000 | | | 16,757,000 | | | 17,093,000 | | | 13,970,000 | | | 1964 | | May 1965 | | | | | | 40 years |
| Park Adams | | Virginia | | 287,000 | | | 1,654,000 | | | 17,029,000 | | | 287,000 | | | 18,683,000 | | | 18,970,000 | | | 13,563,000 | | | 1959 | | Jan 1969 | | | | | | 35 years |
| The Ashby at McLean (f) | | Virginia | | 4,356,000 | | | 17,102,000 | | | 35,968,000 | | | 4,356,000 | | | 53,070,000 | | | 57,426,000 | | | 37,011,000 | | | 1982 | | Aug 1996 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Bethesda Hill Apartments | | Maryland | | 3,900,000 | | | 13,412,000 | | | 18,064,000 | | | 3,900,000 | | | 31,476,000 | | | 35,376,000 | | | 24,995,000 | | | 1986 | | Nov 1997 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Bennett Park | | Virginia | | 2,861,000 | | | 917,000 | | | 83,551,000 | | | 4,774,000 | | | 82,555,000 | | | 87,329,000 | | | 52,189,000 | | | 2007 | | Feb 2001 | | | | | | 28 years |
| The Clayborne | | Virginia | | 269,000 | | | — | | | 32,103,000 | | | 699,000 | | | 31,673,000 | | | 32,372,000 | | | 20,797,000 | | | 2008 | | Jun 2003 | | | | | | 26 years |
| Kenmore Apartments | | Washington, DC | | 28,222,000 | | | 33,955,000 | | | 22,258,000 | | | 28,222,000 | | | 56,213,000 | | | 84,435,000 | | | 26,795,000 | | | 1948 | | Sep 2008 | | | | | | 30 years |
| The Maxwell | | Virginia | | 12,787,000 | | | — | | | 38,993,000 | | | 12,850,000 | | | 38,930,000 | | | 51,780,000 | | | 17,137,000 | | | 2014 | | Jun 2011 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Yale West | | Washington, DC | | 14,684,000 | | | 62,069,000 | | | 2,530,000 | | | 14,684,000 | | | 64,599,000 | | | 79,283,000 | | | 22,468,000 | | | 2011 | | Feb 2014 | | | | | | 30 years |
| The Paramount (f) | | Virginia | | 8,568,000 | | | 38,716,000 | | | 4,554,000 | | | 8,568,000 | | | 43,270,000 | | | 51,838,000 | | | 17,598,000 | | | 1984 | | Oct 2013 | | | | | | 30 years |
| The Wellington | | Virginia | | 30,548,000 | | | 116,563,000 | | | 25,251,000 | | | 30,548,000 | | | 141,814,000 | | | 172,362,000 | | | 44,342,000 | | | 1960 | | Jul 2015 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Trove | | Virginia | | 15,000,000 | | | — | | | 118,826,000 | | | 15,000,000 | | | 118,826,000 | | | 133,826,000 | | | 23,393,000 | | | 2020 | | Jul 2015 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Riverside Apartments | | Virginia | | 38,924,000 | | | 184,854,000 | | | 54,251,000 | | | 38,864,000 | | | 239,165,000 | | | 278,029,000 | | | 72,196,000 | | | 1971 | | May 2016 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Riverside Apartments land parcel (e) | | Virginia | | 15,968,000 | | | — | | | 14,419,000 | | | — | | | 30,387,000 | | | 30,387,000 | | | — | | | n/a | | May 2016 | | | | | | n/a |
| Elme Alexandria | | Virginia | | 23,942,000 | | | 93,672,000 | | | 19,263,000 | | | 23,942,000 | | | 112,935,000 | | | 136,877,000 | | | 19,611,000 | | | 1990 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Manassas | | Virginia | | 13,586,000 | | | 68,802,000 | | | 8,468,000 | | | 13,586,000 | | | 77,270,000 | | | 90,856,000 | | | 14,293,000 | | | 1986 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Dulles | | Virginia | | 12,476,000 | | | 66,852,000 | | | 10,415,000 | | | 12,476,000 | | | 77,267,000 | | | 89,743,000 | | | 14,082,000 | | | 2000 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Leesburg | | Virginia | | 4,113,000 | | | 21,286,000 | | | 1,832,000 | | | 4,113,000 | | | 23,118,000 | | | 27,231,000 | | | 4,937,000 | | | 1986 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Herndon | | Virginia | | 11,225,000 | | | 51,534,000 | | | 8,295,000 | | | 11,225,000 | | | 59,829,000 | | | 71,054,000 | | | 11,369,000 | | | 1991 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Germantown | | Maryland | | 7,609,000 | | | 34,431,000 | | | 4,838,000 | | | 7,609,000 | | | 39,269,000 | | | 46,878,000 | | | 7,569,000 | | | 1990 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Watkins Mill | | Maryland | | 7,151,000 | | | 30,851,000 | | | 2,548,000 | | | 7,151,000 | | | 33,399,000 | | | 40,550,000 | | | 6,900,000 | | | 1975 | | Jun 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Cascade at Landmark | | Virginia | | 12,289,000 | | | 56,235,000 | | | 5,115,000 | | | 12,289,000 | | | 61,350,000 | | | 73,639,000 | | | 10,979,000 | | | 1988 | | Jul 2019 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Conyers | | Georgia | | 4,798,000 | | | 42,122,000 | | | 4,001,000 | | | 4,798,000 | | | 46,123,000 | | | 50,921,000 | | | 4,843,000 | | | 1999 | | Aug 2021 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Eagles Landing | | Georgia | | 16,117,000 | | | 86,460,000 | | | 5,345,000 | | | 16,117,000 | | | 91,805,000 | | | 107,922,000 | | | 8,688,000 | | | 2000 | | Nov 2021 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Sandy Springs | | Georgia | | 17,423,000 | | | 85,817,000 | | | 5,558,000 | | | 17,423,000 | | | 91,375,000 | | | 108,798,000 | | | 7,226,000 | | | 1972 | | Feb 2022 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Marietta | | Georgia | | 19,019,000 | | | 83,319,000 | | | 2,737,000 | | | 19,019,000 | | | 86,056,000 | | | 105,075,000 | | | 5,945,000 | | | 1975 | | May 2022 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Cumberland | | Georgia | | 14,106,000 | | | 51,689,000 | | | 3,705,000 | | | 14,106,000 | | | 55,394,000 | | | 69,500,000 | | | 4,098,000 | | | 1982 | | May 2022 | | | | | | 30 years |
| Elme Druid Hills | | Georgia | | 25,249,000 | | | 79,281,000 | | | 141,000 | | | 25,249,000 | | | 79,422,000 | | | 104,671,000 | | | 1,215,000 | | | 1987 | | Sep 2023 | | | | | | 30 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | $ | 366,233,000 | | | $ | 1,326,267,000 | | | $ | 588,313,000 | | | $ | 352,611,000 | | | $ | 1,928,202,000 | | | $ | 2,280,813,000 | | | $ | 526,321,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Office Building | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Watergate 600 (b) | | Washington, DC | | $ | 45,981,000 | | | $ | 78,325,000 | | | $ | (30,022,000) | | | $ | 31,486,000 | | | $ | 62,798,000 | | | $ | 94,284,000 | | | $ | 1,703,000 | | | 1972 | | Apr 2017 | | | | | | 30 years |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Initial Cost (b) | | Net Improvements (Retirement) since Acquisition | | Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2017 | | Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total (c) | | Year of Construction | | Date of Acquisition | | Net Rentable Square Feet | | Units | | Depreciation Life (d) |
| Multifamily Properties | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3801 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | $ | 420,000 |
| | $ | 2,678,000 |
| | $ | 16,263,000 |
| | $ | 420,000 |
| | $ | 18,941,000 |
| | $ | 19,361,000 |
| | $ | 11,526,000 |
| | 1951 | | Jan 1963 | | 178,000 |
| | 307 |
| | 30 years |
| Roosevelt Towers | | Virginia | | 336,000 |
| | 1,996,000 |
| | 12,890,000 |
| | 336,000 |
| | 14,886,000 |
| | 15,222,000 |
| | 10,151,000 |
| | 1964 | | May 1965 | | 170,000 |
| | 191 |
| | 40 years |
| Park Adams | | Virginia | | 287,000 |
| | 1,654,000 |
| | 12,935,000 |
| | 287,000 |
| | 14,589,000 |
| | 14,876,000 |
| | 9,968,000 |
| | 1959 | | Jan 1969 | | 173,000 |
| | 200 |
| | 35 years |
| The Ashby at McLean (f) | | Virginia | | 4,356,000 |
| | 17,102,000 |
| | 23,569,000 |
| | 4,356,000 |
| | 40,671,000 |
| | 45,027,000 |
| | 25,312,000 |
| | 1982 | | Aug 1996 | | 274,000 |
| | 256 |
| | 30 years |
| Bethesda Hill Apartments | | Maryland | | 3,900,000 |
| | 13,412,000 |
| | 13,896,000 |
| | 3,900,000 |
| | 27,308,000 |
| | 31,208,000 |
| | 18,904,000 |
| | 1986 | | Nov 1997 | | 225,000 |
| | 195 |
| | 30 years |
| Bennett Park | | Virginia | | 2,861,000 |
| | 917,000 |
| | 80,278,000 |
| | 4,774,000 |
| | 79,282,000 |
| | 84,056,000 |
| | 34,586,000 |
| | 2007 | | Feb 2001 | | 215,000 |
| | 224 |
| | 28 years |
| The Clayborne | | Virginia | | 269,000 |
| | — |
| | 31,041,000 |
| | 699,000 |
| | 30,611,000 |
| | 31,310,000 |
| | 15,050,000 |
| | 2008 | | Jun 2003 | | 60,000 |
| | 74 |
| | 26 years |
| The Kenmore (a) | | Washington, DC | | 28,222,000 |
| | 33,955,000 |
| | 13,694,000 |
| | 28,222,000 |
| | 47,649,000 |
| | 75,871,000 |
| | 13,973,000 |
| | 1948 | | Sep 2008 | | 268,000 |
| | 374 |
| | 30 years |
| The Maxwell | | Virginia | | 12,787,000 |
| | — |
| | 38,035,000 |
| | 12,851,000 |
| | 37,971,000 |
| | 50,822,000 |
| | 6,811,000 |
| | 2014 | | Jun 2011 | | 116,000 |
| | 163 |
| | 30 years |
| The Paramount | | Virginia | | 8,568,000 |
| | 38,716,000 |
| | 2,345,000 |
| | 8,568,000 |
| | 41,061,000 |
| | 49,629,000 |
| | 7,715,000 |
| | 1984 | | Oct 2013 | | 141,000 |
| | 135 |
| | 30 years |
| Yale West (a) | | Washington, DC | | 14,684,000 |
| | 62,069,000 |
| | 786,000 |
| | 14,684,000 |
| | 62,855,000 |
| | 77,539,000 |
| | 8,808,000 |
| | 2011 | | Feb 2014 | | 173,000 |
| | 216 |
| | 30 years |
| The Wellington | | Virginia | | 30,548,000 |
| | 116,563,000 |
| | 10,161,000 |
| | 30,548,000 |
| | 126,724,000 |
| | 157,272,000 |
| | 11,206,000 |
| | 1960 | | Jul 2015 | | 600,000 |
| | 711 |
| | 30 years |
| Wellington Land Parcel (Trove) (e) | | Virginia | | 15,000,000 |
| | — |
| | 14,690,000 |
| | — |
| | 29,690,000 |
| | 29,690,000 |
| | — |
| | n/a | | Jul 2015 | | — |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
| Riverside Apartments | | Virginia | | 38,924,000 |
| | 184,854,000 |
| | 20,544,000 |
| | 38,924,000 |
| | 205,398,000 |
| | 244,322,000 |
| | 11,872,000 |
| | 1971 | | May 2016 | | 1,001,000 |
| | 1,222 |
| | 30 years |
| Riverside Apartments Land Parcel (e) | | Virginia | | 15,968,000 |
| | — |
| | 3,254,000 |
| | — |
| | 19,222,000 |
| | 19,222,000 |
| | — |
| | n/a | | May 2016 | | — |
| | n/a |
| | n/a |
| | | | | $ | 177,130,000 |
| | $ | 473,916,000 |
| | $ | 294,381,000 |
| | $ | 148,569,000 |
| | $ | 796,858,000 |
| | $ | 945,427,000 |
| | $ | 185,882,000 |
| | | | | | 3,594,000 |
| | 4,268 |
| | |
| Office Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1901 Pennsylvania Avenue | | Washington, DC | | $ | 892,000 |
| | $ | 3,481,000 |
| | $ | 19,565,000 |
| | $ | 892,000 |
| | $ | 23,046,000 |
| | $ | 23,938,000 |
| | $ | 17,042,000 |
| | 1960 | | May 1977 | | 100,000 |
| | | | 28 years |
| 515 King Street | | Virginia | | 4,102,000 |
| | 3,931,000 |
| | 8,158,000 |
| | 4,102,000 |
| | 12,089,000 |
| | 16,191,000 |
| | 6,255,000 |
| | 1966 | | Jul 1992 | | 75,000 |
| | | | 50 years |
| 1220 19th Street | | Washington, DC | | 7,803,000 |
| | 11,366,000 |
| | 16,550,000 |
| | 7,803,000 |
| | 27,916,000 |
| | 35,719,000 |
| | 16,773,000 |
| | 1976 | | Nov 1995 | | 105,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1600 Wilson Boulevard | | Virginia | | 6,661,000 |
| | 16,742,000 |
| | 28,677,000 |
| | 6,661,000 |
| | 45,419,000 |
| | 52,080,000 |
| | 25,295,000 |
| | 1973 | | Oct 1997 | | 170,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Silverline Center | | Virginia | | 12,049,000 |
| | 71,825,000 |
| | 100,170,000 |
| | 12,049,000 |
| | 171,995,000 |
| | 184,044,000 |
| | 86,729,000 |
| | 1972 | | Nov 1997 | | 549,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Courthouse Square | | Virginia | | — |
| | 17,096,000 |
| | 9,448,000 |
| | — |
| | 26,544,000 |
| | 26,544,000 |
| | 15,441,000 |
| | 1979 | | Oct 2000 | | 118,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1776 G Street | | Washington, DC | | 31,500,000 |
| | 54,327,000 |
| | 9,309,000 |
| | 31,500,000 |
| | 63,636,000 |
| | 95,136,000 |
| | 32,083,000 |
| | 1979 | | Aug 2003 | | 264,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Monument II | | Virginia | | 10,244,000 |
| | 65,205,000 |
| | 9,778,000 |
| | 10,244,000 |
| | 74,983,000 |
| | 85,227,000 |
| | 28,830,000 |
| | 2000 | | Mar 2007 | | 208,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 2000 M Street | | Washington, DC | | — |
| | 61,101,000 |
| | 22,375,000 |
| | — |
| | 83,476,000 |
| | 83,476,000 |
| | 31,355,000 |
| | 1971 | | Dec 2007 | | 233,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 2445 M Street | | Washington, DC | | 46,887,000 |
| | 106,743,000 |
| | (49,374,000 | ) | | 37,333,000 |
| | 66,923,000 |
| | 104,256,000 |
| | 9,099,000 |
| | 1986 | | Dec 2008 | | 292,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 925 Corporate Drive | | Virginia | | 4,518,000 |
| | 24,801,000 |
| | 1,333,000 |
| | 4,518,000 |
| | 26,134,000 |
| | 30,652,000 |
| | 9,747,000 |
| | 2007 | | Jun 2010 | | 135,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1000 Corporate Drive | | Virginia | | 4,897,000 |
| | 25,376,000 |
| | (186,000 | ) | | 4,898,000 |
| | 25,189,000 |
| | 30,087,000 |
| | 8,978,000 |
| | 2009 | | Jun 2010 | | 136,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1140 Connecticut Avenue | | Washington, DC | | 25,226,000 |
| | 50,495,000 |
| | 15,987,000 |
| | 25,226,000 |
| | 66,482,000 |
| | 91,708,000 |
| | 18,774,000 |
| | 1966 | | Jan 2011 | | 184,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1227 25th Street | | Washington, DC | | 17,505,000 |
| | 21,319,000 |
| | 8,653,000 |
| | 17,505,000 |
| | 29,972,000 |
| | 47,477,000 |
| | 8,391,000 |
| | 1988 | | Mar 2011 | | 137,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Braddock Metro Center | | Virginia | | 18,817,000 |
| | 71,250,000 |
| | (14,808,000 | ) | | 16,615,000 |
| | 58,644,000 |
| | 75,259,000 |
| | 6,725,000 |
| | 1985 | | Sep 2011 | | 356,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| John Marshall II | | Virginia | | 13,490,000 |
| | 53,024,000 |
| | 6,351,000 |
| | 13,490,000 |
| | 59,375,000 |
| | 72,865,000 |
| | 13,754,000 |
| | 1996 | | Sep 2011 | | 223,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Fairgate at Ballston | | Virginia | | 17,750,000 |
| | 29,885,000 |
| | 5,794,000 |
| | 17,750,000 |
| | 35,679,000 |
| | 53,429,000 |
| | 9,075,000 |
| | 1988 | | Jun 2012 | | 146,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Army Navy Building | | Washington, DC | | 30,796,000 |
| | 39,315,000 |
| | 10,642,000 |
| | 30,796,000 |
| | 49,957,000 |
| | 80,753,000 |
| | 7,583,000 |
| | 1912 | | Mar 2014 | | 109,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 1775 Eye Street, NW | | Washington, DC | | 48,086,000 |
| | 51,074,000 |
| | 8,473,000 |
| | 48,086,000 |
| | 59,547,000 |
| | 107,633,000 |
| | 10,842,000 |
| | 1964 | | May 2014 | | 188,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Watergate 600 | | Washington, DC | | 45,981,000 |
| | 78,325,000 |
| | 10,192,000 |
| | 45,981,000 |
| | 88,517,000 |
| | 134,498,000 |
| | 3,384,000 |
| | 1972 | | Apr 2017 | | 293,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| | | | | $ | 347,204,000 |
| | $ | 856,681,000 |
| | $ | 227,087,000 |
| | $ | 335,449,000 |
| | $ | 1,095,523,000 |
| | $ | 1,430,972,000 |
| | $ | 366,155,000 |
| | | | | | 4,021,000 |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | | $ | 412,214,000 | | | $ | 1,404,592,000 | | | $ | 558,291,000 | | | $ | 384,097,000 | | | $ | 1,991,000,000 | | | $ | 2,375,097,000 | | | $ | 528,024,000 | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Initial Cost (b) | | Net Improvements (Retirement) since Acquisition | | Gross Amounts at Which Carried at December 31, 2017 | | Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Properties | | Location | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total (c) | | | Year of Construction | | Date of Acquisition | | Net Rentable Square Feet | | Units | | Depreciation Life (d) |
| Retail Centers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Takoma Park | | Maryland | | $ | 415,000 |
| | $ | 1,084,000 |
| | $ | 245,000 |
| | $ | 366,000 |
| | $ | 1,378,000 |
| | $ | 1,744,000 |
| | $ | 1,198,000 |
| | 1962 | | Jul 1963 | | 51,000 |
| | | | 50 years |
| Westminster | | Maryland | | 519,000 |
| | 1,775,000 |
| | 9,899,000 |
| | 519,000 |
| | 11,674,000 |
| | 12,193,000 |
| | 7,948,000 |
| | 1969 | | Sep 1972 | | 150,000 |
| | | | 37 years |
| Concord Centre | | Virginia | | 413,000 |
| | 850,000 |
| | 5,936,000 |
| | 413,000 |
| | 6,786,000 |
| | 7,199,000 |
| | 3,619,000 |
| | 1960 | | Dec 1973 | | 75,000 |
| | | | 33 years |
| Wheaton Park | | Maryland | | 796,000 |
| | 857,000 |
| | 4,853,000 |
| | 796,000 |
| | 5,710,000 |
| | 6,506,000 |
| | 4,114,000 |
| | 1967 | | Sep 1977 | | 74,000 |
| | | | 50 years |
| Bradlee Shopping Center | | Virginia | | 4,152,000 |
| | 5,383,000 |
| | 14,348,000 |
| | 4,152,000 |
| | 19,731,000 |
| | 23,883,000 |
| | 12,571,000 |
| | 1955 | | Dec 1984 | | 172,000 |
| | | | 40 years |
| Chevy Chase Metro Plaza | | Washington, DC | | 1,549,000 |
| | 4,304,000 |
| | 8,298,000 |
| | 1,549,000 |
| | 12,602,000 |
| | 14,151,000 |
| | 7,366,000 |
| | 1975 | | Sep 1985 | | 49,000 |
| | | | 50 years |
| Shoppes of Foxchase | | Virginia | | 5,838,000 |
| | 2,979,000 |
| | 14,812,000 |
| | 5,838,000 |
| | 17,791,000 |
| | 23,629,000 |
| | 7,914,000 |
| | 1960 | | Jun 1994 | | 134,000 |
| | | | 50 years |
| Frederick County Square | | Maryland | | 6,561,000 |
| | 6,830,000 |
| | 5,376,000 |
| | 6,561,000 |
| | 12,206,000 |
| | 18,767,000 |
| | 8,302,000 |
| | 1973 | | Aug 1995 | | 228,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| 800 S. Washington Street | | Virginia | | 2,904,000 |
| | 5,489,000 |
| | 5,954,000 |
| | 2,904,000 |
| | 11,443,000 |
| | 14,347,000 |
| | 5,485,000 |
| | 1951 | | Jun 1998 | | 46,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Centre at Hagerstown | | Maryland | | 13,029,000 |
| | 25,415,000 |
| | 2,144,000 |
| | 13,029,000 |
| | 27,559,000 |
| | 40,588,000 |
| | 14,358,000 |
| | 2000 | | Jun 2002 | | 333,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Frederick Crossing | | Maryland | | 12,759,000 |
| | 35,477,000 |
| | 2,070,000 |
| | 12,759,000 |
| | 37,547,000 |
| | 50,306,000 |
| | 16,709,000 |
| | 1999 | | Mar 2005 | | 295,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Randolph Shopping Center | | Maryland | | 4,928,000 |
| | 13,025,000 |
| | 1,188,000 |
| | 4,928,000 |
| | 14,213,000 |
| | 19,141,000 |
| | 5,809,000 |
| | 1972 | | May 2006 | �� | 83,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Montrose Shopping Center | | Maryland | | 11,612,000 |
| | 22,410,000 |
| | 2,285,000 |
| | 11,020,000 |
| | 25,287,000 |
| | 36,307,000 |
| | 10,105,000 |
| | 1970 | | May 2006 | | 147,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Gateway Overlook | | Maryland | | 28,816,000 |
| | 52,249,000 |
| | 763,000 |
| | 29,110,000 |
| | 52,718,000 |
| | 81,828,000 |
| | 18,937,000 |
| | 2007 | | Dec 2010 | | 220,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Olney Village Center (a) | | Maryland | | 15,842,000 |
| | 39,133,000 |
| | 2,114,000 |
| | 15,842,000 |
| | 41,247,000 |
| | 57,089,000 |
| | 9,768,000 |
| | 1979 | | Aug 2011 | | 198,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| Spring Valley Village (f) | | Washington, DC | | 10,836,000 |
| | 32,238,000 |
| | 4,532,000 |
| | 10,836,000 |
| | 36,770,000 |
| | 47,606,000 |
| | 4,177,000 |
| | 1941 | | Oct 2014 | | 78,000 |
| | | | 30 years |
| | | | | $ | 120,969,000 |
| | $ | 249,498,000 |
| | $ | 84,817,000 |
| | $ | 120,622,000 |
| | $ | 334,662,000 |
| | $ | 455,284,000 |
| | $ | 138,380,000 |
| | | | | | 2,333,000 |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | | $ | 645,303,000 |
| | $ | 1,580,095,000 |
| | $ | 606,285,000 |
| | $ | 604,640,000 |
| | $ | 2,227,043,000 |
| | $ | 2,831,683,000 |
| | $ | 690,417,000 |
| | | | | | 9,948,000 |
| | 4,268 |
| | |
______________________________
a) At December 31, 2017, our properties were encumbered by non-recourse mortgage amounts as follows: $32.2 million on The Kenmore, $13.1 million on Olney Village Center and $46.6 million on Yale West. Mortgage amounts exclude premiums and debt loan costs.
b) The purchase cost of real estate investments has been divided between land and buildings and improvements on the basis of management’s determination of the fair values.
b) During 2023, we recognized an impairment charge of $41.9 million on Watergate 600 in order to reduce its carrying value to its estimated fair value, which declined due to changes in market conditions in the Washington, DC metro region office market.
c) At December 31, 2017,2023, total land, buildings and improvements are carried at $1,983.3 million$1.5 billion for federal income tax purposes.
d) The useful life shown is for the main structure. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over various useful lives ranging from 3 to 5040 years.
e) As of December 31, 2017, Washington REIT2023, Elme Communities had one residential property under development, multifamily properties, the Wellington land parcel (Trove) and Riverside Apartments land parcel. The value not yet placed into service at December 31, 20172023 was $29.7 million and $19.2 million, respectively.
$30.4 million.
f) As of December 31, 2017, Washington REIT2023, Elme Communities had investments in various development, redevelopment and renovation projects, including Spring Valley Village and The Ashby at McLean.McLean and The Paramount. The total value of these projects, which has not yet been placed in service, is $5.5$0.6 million at December 31, 2017.
2023.
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
ELME COMMUNITIES AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUMMARY OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(IN THOUSANDS)
The following is a reconciliation of real estate assets and accumulated depreciation for the three years ended December 31, 20172023 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Real estate assets | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 2,299,712 | | | $ | 1,990,810 | | | $ | 3,021,232 | |
| Additions: | | | | | |
Property acquisitions (1) | 104,530 | | | 271,373 | | | 149,497 | |
Improvements (1) | 48,075 | | | 37,539 | | | 34,095 | |
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Impairment write-down | (77,220) | | | — | | | — | |
| Write-off of disposed assets | — | | | (10) | | | (619) | |
| Property sales | — | | | — | | | (1,213,395) | |
| Balance, end of period | $ | 2,375,097 | | | $ | 2,299,712 | | | $ | 1,990,810 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 479,846 | | | $ | 401,926 | | | $ | 749,014 | |
| Additions: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 83,538 | | | 78,267 | | | 86,399 | |
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Impairment write-down | (35,360) | | | — | | | — | |
| Write-off of disposed assets | — | | | (347) | | | (27) | |
| Property sales | — | | | — | | | (433,460) | |
| Balance, end of period | $ | 528,024 | | | $ | 479,846 | | | $ | 401,926 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Real estate assets | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 2,725,635 |
| | $ | 2,673,891 |
| | $ | 2,547,188 |
|
| Additions: | | | | | |
Property acquisitions (1) | 124,306 |
| | 240,499 |
| | 162,702 |
|
Improvements (1) | 84,560 |
| | 66,840 |
| | 50,954 |
|
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Impairment write-down | (81,982 | ) | | — |
| | (5,909 | ) |
| Write-off of disposed assets | (2,655 | ) | | (1,272 | ) | | (3,291 | ) |
| Property sales | (18,181 | ) | | (254,323 | ) | | (77,753 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | $ | 2,831,683 |
| | $ | 2,725,635 |
| | $ | 2,673,891 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | | | | | |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 657,425 |
| | $ | 692,608 |
| | $ | 640,434 |
|
| Additions: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 94,558 |
| | 88,347 |
| | 86,536 |
|
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Impairment write-down | (48,830 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Write-off of disposed assets | (1,708 | ) | | (486 | ) | | (2,408 | ) |
| Property sales | (11,028 | ) | | (123,044 | ) | | (31,954 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | $ | 690,417 |
| | $ | 657,425 |
| | $ | 692,608 |
|
(1) Includes non-cash accruals for capital items.
