UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016
Commission file number 001-14041
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts 04-2882273
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
400 Wood Road,
Braintree, Massachusetts 02184-9114
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 
(781) 848-7100
 (Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
(Title of Each Class) (Name of Exchange on Which Registered)
Common stock, $.01 par value per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.).  Yes o     No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming for these purposes that all executive officers and directors are “affiliates” of the registrant) as of September 29, 201226, 2015, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $2,031,424,216$1,738,830,869 (based on the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding as of April 27, 2013May 20, 2016 was 51,076,655.51,042,696.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on July 24, 201321, 2016 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

  
Page
Number
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 4A.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
 EX-21.1
 EX-23.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT


Table of Contents



ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Company Overview

Haemonetics is a global healthcare company dedicated to providing innovative blood management solutionsproducts to our customers. Ourcustomers involved in the processing, handling and analysis of blood. We offer a comprehensive portfolio of integrated devices and information management and consulting services offers blood management solutions for each facettools with the goal of the blood supply chain, helping improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs for blood and plasma collectors, hospitals, and patients around the world. Our productsWhen used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and services help prevent“the Company” mean Haemonetics.

Haemonetics was founded in 1971 as a transfusionmedical device company — a pioneer and market leader in developing and manufacturing automated blood component collection devices and surgical blood salvage devices. In May 1991, we completed an initial public offering and to a patient who does not need one and provide the right blood product, at the right time, in the right dose to the patient who does.this day remain an independent company.

Blood and its components (plasma, platelets, and red cells) have many vital - and frequently life-saving - clinical applications. Plasma is used for patients with major blood loss and is manufactured into pharmaceuticals to treat a variety of illnesses and hereditary disorders such as hemophilia. Red cells treat trauma patients or patients undergoing surgery with high blood loss, such as open heart surgery or organ transplant. Platelets treat cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Blood is essential to a modern healthcare system.

Haemonetics is committed to helping our customers createdevelops and maintain a safe and efficient blood supply chain. Specifically, we develop and marketmarkets a wide range of systems used with plasma and blood donors that collect and process blood into its components using both manual and automated methods. We also develop and market a variety of systems to hospitals that automate the cleaning and reinfusion of a surgical patient's blood during surgery, automate the tracking and distribution of blood in the hospital, and enhance blood diagnostics. We also sell information technology platforms to promote efficient and compliant operations for all of our customer groups. Finally, we provide consulting services to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies in blood management. By better understanding our customers' needs, we are creating comprehensive blood management solutions for blood collectors and healthcare systems in more than 97 countries around the world.

Haemonetics was founded in 1971 as a medical device company — a pioneer and market leader in developing and manufacturing automated blood component collection devices and surgical blood salvage devices. In May 1991, we completed an initial public offering and to this day remain an independent company. Several years ago, we embarked on a strategy to expand our markets and product portfolio to offer more comprehensive blood management solutions to serve our customers. Through internal product developmentWe provide plasma collection systems and external acquisitions, we have significantly expanded our product offerings.

On August 1, 2012 we completed the acquisition of the business assets of the blood collection, filtration and processing product lines of Pall Corporation.software which enable plasma fractionators to make life saving pharmaceuticals. We paid $535.2 million in cash consideration following resolution of post-closing adjustmentsprovide analytical devices for working capital and historical earnings levels. The acquisition was funded utilizing $475.0 million of loans and the remainder from cash on hand. Themeasuring hemostasis which enable healthcare providers to better manage their patients’ bleeding risk. Haemonetics makes blood processing systems and equipment acquired aresoftware which make blood donation more efficient and track life giving blood components. Finally, Haemonetics supplies systems and software which facilitate blood transfusions and cell processing.


Market and Products

Product Lines
We recently undertook a global strategic review of our business portfolio to identify which end markets and product franchises have the strongest growth opportunities. As a result of that review, we organized our current products into four franchises for use in transfusion medicinepurposes of evaluating their growth potential: Plasma, Hemostasis Management, Donor and include manufacturing facilities in Covina, California; Tijuana, Mexico; Ascoli, ItalyCell Processing. In that review, “Plasma” included plasma collection devices and a portiondisposables, plasma donor management software and anticoagulant and saline sold to plasma customers. “Hemostasis Management” included devices and methodologies for measuring coagulation characteristics of Pall's assets in Fajardo, Puerto Rico. Approximately 1,300 employees transferred to Haemonetics. We anticipate paying an additional $15.0 million upon the replicationblood, such as our TEG® Hemostasis Analyzer. “Donor” included blood collection and delivery of certain manufacturing assets of Pall's filter media business to Haemonetics by 2016. Until that time, Pall will manufactureprocessing devices and sell filter media to Haemonetics under a supply agreement. We refer to this newly acquired business as the whole blood business. This acquisition provides access to the manual collectiondisposables for red cells, platelets and whole blood as well as related donor management software. “Cell Processing” included surgical blood salvage systems, specialized blood cell processing systems, disposables and blood transfusion management software.

In connection with this strategic review, we concluded that Plasma and Hemostasis Management have the greatest growth potential, while Cell Processing innovation offers an opportunity to increase market share and expand into new segments. Donor is competing in challenging markets which require us to manage the business differently, including reducing costs and has providedthe scope for introduction of automated solutions into those markets.the current product line. In recognition of these conclusions, we have begun to implement an operating model that will streamline the management structure and rationalize our cost structure, with an aim to bring about sustainable productivity improvement across the organization. Overall, we expect implementation of our new direction will require multiple changes and will extend beyond fiscal 2017.

On April 30, 2013To provide continuity while we completedare implementing these changes to our business approach, we are reporting our results consistent with how management viewed the acquisition of certain assets of Hemerus LLC, a Minnesota based company that develops innovative technologies for the collection of whole blood and processing and storage of blood components. Hemerus has received FDA approval for SOLX® whole blood collection system for eight hour storage of whole blood. Hemerus previously received CE Marking (Conformité Européenne) in the European Union to market SOLX as the world's first 56-day red blood cell storage solution. We paid $23.0 million cash in addition to the $1.0 million paid earlybusiness in fiscal 2013. We will pay an additional $3.0 million contingent upon a further FDA approval of the SOLX solution for 24 hour storage of whole blood2016 and prior to processing, and will pay up to $14.0 million based on future sales of SOLX-based products achieved within the next 10 years.
Markets and Products
We serveperiods.  In those periods, we viewed our company as serving three markets:customer groups: manufacturers of plasma derived pharmaceuticals, blood collectors, and hospitals. We reportIn fiscal 2016 and previous periods included within this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have reported revenues for multiple product lines under four global product categories: Plasma, Blood Center, Hospital, and Software Solutions.

In these results, “Plasma” includes plasma collection devices and consumables.disposables. “Blood Center” includes blood collection and processing devices and consumables.disposables. “Hospital” includes surgical blood salvage and blood demand diagnostic devices and consumables.disposables. “Software Solutions” includes information technology platforms and consulting services provided to all three markets.

1

Table of Contents

Although we address our customers' needs through multiple product lines, we manage our business as onefive operating segment:segments based primarily on geography: (a) North America Plasma, (b) Americas Blood Center and Hospital, (c) Europe, Middle East and Africa (collectively "EMEA"), (d) Asia Pacific and (e) Japan. The North America Plasma reporting unit is a separate operating segment with dedicated segment management due the design, manufacture, implementation, supportsize and marketingscale of blood management solutions. Our chiefthe plasma business.
For financial reporting purposes, we aggregate our five operating decision-maker uses consolidated financial results to makesegments into four reportable segments which include:
Japan
EMEA
North America Plasma
All Other
We have aggregated the following two operating segments into the All Other reportable segment based upon their similar operational and strategic decisions. Design and manufacturing processes, as well as economic characteristics, including similarity of operating margin:
Americas Blood Center and the regulatory environment in which we operate,Hospital
Asia - Pacific
Segment Assets

Our assets by segment are largely the same for all product lines.set forth below:
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Japan$129,551
 $146,765
 $159,227
EMEA249,504
 305,540
 329,316
North America Plasma453,212
 467,249
 421,706
All Other486,861
 565,863
 603,929
Total assets$1,319,128
 $1,485,417
 $1,514,178
The financial information required for the operating segmentsegments is included herein in Note 15 of the14, Segment Information, to our consolidated financial statements entitled Segment Information.contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Plasma
The Plasma Collection Market for Fractionation Human plasma is collected and processed by bio-pharmaceutical companies into therapeutic and diagnostic products that aid in the treatment of immune diseases and coagulation disorders. While plasma is also used to aid patients with extreme blood loss, such as trauma victims, this portion of our businessbio-pharmaceutical companies solely focusesfocus on plasma's pharmaceutical uses. Automated plasma collection technology allows for the safe and efficient collection of plasma. We manufacture and market automated plasma collection devices and respective disposables, but do not make plasma-derived pharmaceuticals.
Many bio-pharmaceutical companies are vertically integrated in all components of their business and thus are now collecting and fractionating the plasma required to manufacture their pharmaceuticals. This vertical integration paved the way for highly efficient plasma supply chain management and the plasma industry leverages information technology to manage operations from the point of plasma donation to fractionation to the production of the final product.
Haemonetics' Plasma Products — Our portfolio of products and services is designed to support multiple facets of plasma collector operations. We have a long-standing commitment to understanding our customers' collection and fractionation processes. As a result, we deliver product quality and reliability; design equipment that is durable, dependable, and easy to use; and provide comprehensive training and support, and strong business continuity practices.
Historically, plasma for fractionation was collected manually, which was time-consuming, labor-intensive, produced relatively poor yields, and posed risk to donors. Today, the vast majority of plasma collections worldwide are performed using automated collection technology because it is safer and more cost-effective. With our PCS® brand automated plasma collection technology, more plasma can be collected during any one donation event because the other blood components are returned to the donor through the sterile disposable sets used for the plasma donation procedure.

We offer “one stop shopping” to our plasma collection customers, enabling them to source from us the full range of products necessary for plasma collection and storage, including PCS® brand plasma collection equipment and consumables,disposables, plasma collection containers, and intravenous solutions.solutions such as saline. We also offer a robust portfolio of integrated information technology platforms for plasma customers to manage their donors, operations, and supply chain. Our products automate the donor interview and qualification process; streamline the workflow process in the plasma center; provide the controls necessary to evaluate donor suitability; determine the ability to release units collected; and manage unit distribution. With our software solutions, plasma collectors can manage processes across the plasma supply chain, react quickly to business changes, and identify opportunities to reduce costs.
Our plasma disposables product line represented 30.1%38.4%, 35.5%35.1%, and 33.6%31.1% of our total revenue in fiscal 20132016, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively.
Blood Center
The Blood Collection Market for Transfusion — There are millions of blood donations throughout the world every year that produce blood products for transfusion to surgical, trauma, or chronically ill patients. Patients typically receive only the blood components necessary to treat a particular clinical condition: for example, red cells to surgical patients, platelets to cancer patients, and plasma to trauma victims.
Platelet therapy is frequently used to alleviate the effects of chemotherapy and help patients with bleeding disorders. Red cells are often transfused to patients to replace blood lost during surgery. Red cells are also transfused to patients with blood disorders, such as sickle cell anemia or aplastic anemia. Plasma, in addition to its role in creating life-saving pharmaceuticals, is frequently transfused to trauma victims and to replace blood volume lost during surgery.

DemandThe demand for blood has declined modestlycomponents varies across the world. While overall we expect total demand to remain stable, demand in matureindividual markets due to the development of less invasive, lower blood loss medical procedures and blood management.can vary greatly. Highly populated emerging market countries are increasing theirseeing demand

2

Table of Contents

for blood growth as they are advancing theirexpand healthcare coverage, and ascoverage. As greater numbers of people gain access to more advanced medical treatment, demand for blood components, plasma-derived drugs, and surgical procedures increases. In more mature markets, the development of less invasive, lower blood loss procedures and better blood management has offset the demand increases directly.from aging populations. This is particularly true in the United States, where we saw collections decline by approximately 10% in fiscal 2015 and 7% in fiscal 2016. We expect further declines in fiscal 2017.

Most donations worldwide are manual whole blood donations. In this process, whole blood is collected from the donor and then transported to a laboratory where it is separated into its components: red cells, platelets and/or plasma.
In addition to manual collections, there is a significant market for automated component blood collections. In this procedure, the blood separation process is automated and occurs in “real-time” while a person is donating blood. In this separation method, only the specific blood component targeted is collected, and the remaining components are returned to the blood donor. Automated blood component collection allows significantly more of the targeted blood component to be collected during a donation event, especially red cells where our automated system supports collection of two units from eligible donors.
Haemonetics’ Blood Center Products Today, Haemonetics offers automated blood component and manual whole blood collection systems to blood collection centers to collect blood products efficiently and cost effectively.
We market the MCS® (Multicomponent Collection System) brand apheresis equipment which is designed to collect specific blood components integrated from the donor. Utilizing the MCS® automated platelet collection protocols, blood centers collect one or more therapeutic “doses” of platelets during a single donation by a volunteer blood donor.donation. The MCS® two-unit protocol or double red cell collection device helps blood collectors optimize the collection of red cells by automating the blood separation function, eliminating the need for laboratory processing, and enabling the collection of two units of red cells from a single donor thus maximizing the amount of red cells collected per eligible donor and helping to mitigate red cell shortages in countries where this problem exists. Blood collectors can also use the MCS® system to collect one unit of red cells and a "jumbo" (double) unit of plasma, or one unit of red cells and one unit of platelets from a single donor. The MCS® plasma protocol, providingwhich provides the possibility to collectof collecting 600-800ml of plasma for either transfusion to patients or for use by the pharmaceutical industry, use completes the comprehensive portfolio of different blood component collection options on this device.
With the whole blood acquisition, Haemonetics now also offers a portfolio of products for manual whole blood collection and processing. The assets acquired from Pall Corporation provide us with filter technology and manufacturing capability as well as a broad portfolio of manual collection, filtration and processing products. Haemonetics' portfolio of disposable whole blood collection and component storage sets offer flexibility in collecting a unit of whole

blood and the subsequent production and storage of the red blood cell, platelet, and/or plasma products, including options for in-line or dockable filters for leukoreduction of any blood component. In addition, our innovative AcrodoseSM product line provides a closed system for the pooling, storage, and bacteria testing of leukoreduced whole blood derived platelet concentrates, an AcrodoseSM Platelet, that is “transfusion ready” for the hospital. Use of Acrodose platelets lowers hospital handling costs by eliminating the need for pooling and bacteria testing at the hospital.
With the ACP® (Automated Cell Processor) brand, Haemonetics offers a small bench-top solution to automate the washing and freezing of red cell components in the lab.components. The automated red cell washing procedure removes plasma proteins within the red cell units to provide a safer product for transfusion to frequently transfused patients, neonates, or patients with a history of transfusion reactions. The automated glycerolization and deglycerolization steps are required to prepare red cells for frozen storage. Freezing the red cell units can expand the shelf life of these products up to 10 years. Customers utilize this technology to implement strategic red cell inventories for catastrophe cases, storage of rare blood types, or enhanced inventory management.
With the whole blood acquisition, Haemonetics now offers filtration products for the hospital. These filters are used during the blood transfusion process for reduction of particulate debris, fat globules and leukocytes in the blood components.
Our blood center disposables product line represented 40.1%34.2%, 29.7%37.3%, and 30.0%41.5% of our total revenue in fiscal 20132016, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively.
Hospital
The Transfusion Market for Hospitals — Loss of blood is common in many surgical procedures, including open heart, trauma, transplant, vascular, and orthopedic procedures, and the need for transfusion of oxygen-carrying red cells to make up for lost blood volume is routine. Patients commonly receive donor blood, referred to as “allogeneic blood,” which carries various risks including risk of transfusion with the wrong blood type; risk of transfusion

3

Table of Contents

reactions including death, but more commonly chills, fevers or other side effects that can prolong a patient’s recovery; and risk of transfusion of blood with a blood-borne disease or infectious agent.
An alternative to allogeneic blood is surgical cell salvage, also known as autotransfusion, which reduces or eliminates a patient’s need for blood donated from others and ensures that the patient receives the freshest and safest blood possible — his or her own. Surgical cell salvage involves the collection of a patient’s own blood during and after surgery, for reinfusion of red cells to that patient. Blood is suctioned from the surgical site or collected from a wound or chest drain, processed and washed through a centrifuge-based system that yields concentrated red cells available for transfusion back to the patient. This process occurs in a sterile, closed-circuit, single-use consumable set that is fitted into an electromechanical device. We market our surgical blood salvage products to surgical specialists, primarily cardiovascular, orthopedic, and trauma surgeons, and to surgical suite service providers.
Haemonetics’ Hospital Products — Haemonetics offersBlood loss also has profound implications for a range of blood management solutions that significantly improve a hospital's systems for acquiring blood, storing it in the hospital, and dispensing it efficiently and correctly. Over the last few years, hospitals have become more aware of their need to control costs and improve patient safety by managing blood more effectively. Our products and integrated solution platforms help hospitals optimize performance of blood acquisition, storage, and distribution.

Our TEG® Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer system is a blood diagnostic instrument that measures a patient'spatient’s hemostasis or the ability to formeffectively produce clots without causing thrombosis. Hemostasis management plays a role in various medical procedures including: liver transplant, cardiovascular procedures, trauma and maintain blood clots.percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). By understanding a patient’s clotting ability, clinicians can better plan for the patient’s care, deciding in advance whether to start or discontinue use of certain drugs or, determine the likelihood of the patient's need for a transfusion and which blood components will be most effective in stopping bleeding. Such planning supports the best possible clinical outcome,better care, which can lead to lower hospital costs through a reduction in unnecessary donor blood transfusions, reduced adverse transfusion reactions, and shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays,stays. We market our hemostasis analyzers to hospitals and exploratory surgeries.laboratories as an alternative to less comprehensive blood tests.
Haemonetics’ Hospital Products — Haemonetics offers a range of blood management solutions that improve a hospital's systems for acquiring blood, storing it in the hospital, and dispensing it efficiently and correctly. Over the last few years, hospitals have become increasingly aware of their need to control costs and improve patient safety by managing blood more effectively. Our products and integrated solution platforms help hospitals optimize performance of blood acquisition, storage, and distribution.

The TEG® Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer system is a blood diagnostic instrument that measures a patient's hemostasis, the ability to form and maintain blood clots. Haemonetics acquired Haemoscope Corporation and the TEG 5000 technology in 2007 and now exclusively licenses the TEG 6s technology in the hospital and labs market from Cora Healthcare, Inc., a company established by the founders of Haemoscope. We have launched the TEG 6s in certain markets in Europe and Asia. During fiscal 2016, the TEG 6s received final 510(k) clearance from the FDA in North America, our largest market for TEG, for the indications of cardiovascular surgery and cardiology procedures allowing us to launch the product in those markets.
The Cell Saver® system is a surgical blood salvage system targeted to procedures that involve rapid, high-volume blood loss, such as cardiovascular surgeries. It has become the standard of care for high blood-loss surgeries. In fiscal 2012, we launched the Cell Saver® Elite® system, which is our most advanced autotransfusion option to minimize allogeneic blood use for surgeries with medium to high blood loss.

The OrthoPAT® surgical blood salvage system is targeted to orthopedic procedures, such as orthopedic, thathip and knee replacements, which involve slower, lower volume blood loss that often occurs well after surgery. The cardioPAT®system is a surgical blood salvage system targeted to open heart surgeries when there is less blood loss during surgery, but where the blood loss continues post-surgery. These systems are designed to remain with the patient following surgery, to recover blood and produce a washed red cell product for autotransfusion. Their Quick-Connect feature permits customers to utilize the blood processing set selectively, depending on the patient's need.
Our IMPACT® Online web-based software platform, which monitors and measures improvements in a hospital’s blood management practices, provides hospitals with a baseline view of their blood management metrics and helps monitor transfusion rates. Business consulting solutions are offered to support process excellence and blood management efforts. We also provide blood management assessment tools to hospitals that enable our customers to monitor their progress in order to continually improve their blood management performance.
Our hospital disposables product line represented 14.7%13.7%, 16.6%13.7%, and 18.0%13.3% of our total revenue in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Software Solutions
Haemonetics' Software Products and Services — We have a suite of integrated software solutions for improving efficiencies and helping ensure donor and patient safety. This includes solutions for blood drive planning, donor recruitment and retention, blood collection, component manufacturing and distribution, transfusion management, and remote blood allocation. For our plasma customers, we also provide information technology platforms for managing donors and information associated with the collection of plasma products and their processing within fractionation facilities. While each Haemonetics information technology platform can be used independently,
For our mission to provide "Arm to Arm®" blood management solutions means they can also work together through integration to further improve process workflows. Also, the ability to evaluate information based on the integration of these systems allowsHospital customers, to continually improve their business processes. Leveraging information to make more informed decisions is a significant component of Haemonetics' overall commitment to improving blood management systems globally.

4


Integrated Blood Management Solutions —Combining software solutions with devices, we meet our goal of offering customers powerful tools for improving blood management while driving growth of our consumables. For example, a hospital may use our consulting services to analyze its blood management practices and recommend changes in practice. Then, the hospital can leverage our systems and services to analyze blood utilization, manage blood inventory, and potentially reduce demand for donated blood. Finally, hospitals can use our IMPACT® Online blood management business intelligence portal to monitor the results of its new blood management practices. The positive patient impact and reduced costs from this integrated blood management approach can be significant. Likewise, by understanding best practices, blood demand, and discreet patient needs, hospitals can more frequently deploy our devices for hemostasis diagnosis and cell salvage to ensure best patient care.
While each of our products, platforms, and services can be marketed individually, our blood management solutions vision is to offer integrated closed-loop solutions for blood supply chain management. Our software solutions — information technology platforms and consulting services — can be combined with our devices and sold through our plasma, blood center, and hospital sales forces.
Our software products help hospitals track and safely deliver stored blood products. SafeTrace Tx® is our software solution that helps manage blood product inventory, perform patient cross-matching, and manage transfusions. In addition, our BloodTrack® suite of solutions manages tracking and control of blood products from the hospital blood center through to transfusion to the patient. “Smart” refrigerators located in or near operating suites, emergency rooms, and other parts of the hospital dispense blood units with secure control and automated traceability for efficient documentation. With
For Blood Center customers, our more comprehensive offerings, hospitals are better able to manage processes across the blood supply chain and identify increased opportunities to reduce costs and enhance processes.
We believe a key example of our blood management solutions is the potential to balance blood demand with supply and mitigate shortages of blood components and reduce collection costs. Our software solutions such as our SafeTrace® and El Dorado Donor® donation and blood unit management systems, span blood center operations and automate and track operations from the recruitment of the blood donor to the disposition of the blood product. Our Hemasphere® software solution provides support for more efficient blood drive planning, and Donor Doc® and e-Donor® software help to improve recruitment and retention. Combined, our solutions help blood collectors improve the safety, regulatory compliance, and efficiency of blood collection and supply.
Our software solutions product line represented 7.8%8.0%, 9.7%7.9%, and 9.9%7.5% of our total revenue in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Marketing/Sales/Distribution
We market and sell our products to commercial plasma collectors,bio-pharmaceutical companies, blood collection groups and independent blood centers, hospitals and hospital service providers, group purchasing organizations and national health organizations through our own direct sales force (including full-time sales representatives and clinical specialists) as well as independent distributors. Sales representatives target the primary decision-makers within each of those organizations.
United States
In fiscal 20132016, 20122015 and 20112014 approximately 51.0%57.1%, 48.4%54.4%, and 46.9%53.4%, respectively, of consolidated net revenues were generated in the U.S., where we primarily use a direct sales force to sell our products. See Note 14, Segment Information, to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 for additional information.
Outside the United States
In fiscal 20132016, 20122015 and 20112014 approximately 49.0%42.9%, 51.6%45.6%, and 53.1%46.6%, respectively, of consolidated net revenues were generated through sales to non-U.S. customers. Outside the United States, we use a combination of direct sales force and distributors. See Note 14, Segment Information, to our consolidated financial statement contained in Item 8 for additional information.
Research and Development
Our research and development (“R&D”) centers in the United States and Switzerland ensure that protocol variations are incorporated to closely match local customer requirements. In addition, our Haemonetics Software Solutions also maintains software development operations in Canada and France.
Customer collaboration iscollaborations are also an important part of our technical strength and competitive advantage. These collaborationcollaborations with customers and transfusion experts provide us with ideas for new products and applications, enhanced protocols, and potential test sites as well as objective evaluations and expert opinions regarding technical and performance issues.

5

Table of Contents

The development of blood component separation products and extracorporeal blood typing and screening systems has required us to maintain technical expertise in various engineering disciplines, including mechanical, electrical, software, and biomedical engineering and material science. Innovations resulting from these various engineering efforts enable us to develop systems that are faster, smaller, and more user-friendly, or that incorporate additional features important to our customer base.

Research and development expense was $44.4$45.0 million in fiscal 20132016, $36.8$54.2 million in fiscal 20122015 and $32.7$54.2 million in fiscal 20112014, representing approximately 5.0% - 6.0% of our net sales each year.

In fiscal 2013, R&D2016, research and development resources were allocated to supporting a next generation orthopedic perioperative autotransfusion device,plasma collection and software systems, a series of elements comprising an automated whole blood collection system,new TEG® Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer, and several other projectsenhancements to enhance our currentlegacy product portfolio.portfolios.
Manufacturing

Our principal manufacturing operations are located in the United States, Mexico, Scotland, Switzerland and Italy.Malaysia.

In fiscal 2016, we completed our Value Creation and Capture (“VCC”) opportunities initiative. This initiative included (i) discontinuation of manufacturing activities at our Ascoli-Piceno, Italy and Braintree, Massachusetts facilities, (ii) expansion of our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico, (iii) transfer of all equipment production to our contract manufacturer, Sanmina Corporation, and (iv) consolidation of the manufacturing of product formerly produced in the U.S. and Italy to our new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia. We continue to manufacture in Bothwell, Scotland. Refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources within our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the costs of these activities.

As part of our global strategic review, we continue to evaluate our manufacturing operations. Accordingly, we may make further changes to our manufacturing footprint based on future business conditions.
In general, our production activities occur in controlled settings or “clean room” environments. Each step of the manufacturing and assembly process is quality checked, qualified, and validated. Critical process steps and materials are documented to ensure that every unit is produced consistently and meets performance requirements. All of our otherOur equipment and disposable manufacturing sites are certified to the ISO 13485 standard and to the Medical Device Directive allowing placement of the CE mark of conformity.
Plastics are the principal component of our disposable products. Contracts with our suppliers help mitigate some of the short-term effects of price volatility in this market. However, increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to procure plastic raw materials.
Contractors manufacture some component-setscomponent sets and equipment according to our specifications. We maintain important relationships with two Japanese manufacturers that produce finished consumablesdisposables in Singapore, Japan, and Thailand.We have also engaged Sanmina Corporation to be the sole manufacturer of certain equipment. Certain parts and components are purchased from sole source vendors. We believe that if necessary, alternative sources of supply are available in most cases, and could be secured within a relatively short period of time. Nevertheless, an interruption in supply could temporarily interfere with production schedules and affect our operations.
Each blood processing machineOur equipment is designed in-house and assembled by us or our contracted manufacturers from components that are either manufactured by us or to our specifications. The completed instruments are programmed, calibrated, and tested to ensure compliance with our engineering and quality assurance specifications. Inspection checks are conducted throughout the manufacturing process to verify proper assembly and functionality. When mechanical and electronic components are sourced from outside vendors, those vendors must meet detailed qualification and process control requirements.

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission has issued final rules regarding the disclosure of use of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, which are mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries. These rules could have an adverse effect on the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products.
Intellectual Property
We consider our intellectual property rights to be important to our business. We rely on patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws, as well as provisions in our agreements with third parties, to protect our intellectual property rights. We hold patents in the United States and many international jurisdictions on some of our machines, processes, disposables and related technologies. These patents cover certain elements of our systems, including protocols employed in our equipment and certain aspects of our processing chambers and disposables. Our patents may cover current products, products in markets we plan to enter, or products in markets we plan to license, or the patents may be defensive in that they are directed to technologies not currently embodied in our current products. We may also license patent rights from third parties that cover technologies that we plan to use in our business. To maintain our competitive position, we rely on the technical expertise and know-how of our personnel and on our patent rights. We pursue an active and formal program of invention disclosure and patent application in both the United States and foreign jurisdictions. We own various trademarks that have been registered in the United States and certain other countries.
Our policy is to obtain patent and trademark rights in the U.S. and foreign countries where such rights are available and we believe it is commercially advantageous to do so. However, the standards for international protection of intellectual property

vary widely. We cannot assure that pending patent and trademark applications will result in issued patents and registered trademarks, that patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors, or that our patents will not be determined invalid.

6

Table of Contents

Competition
We have established a record of innovation and leadership in each of the areas in which we compete. To remain competitive, we must continue to develop and acquire new cost-effective products, information technology platforms, and business services. We believe that our ability to maintain a competitive advantage will continue to depend on a combination of factors. Some factors are largely within our control such asas: (i) maintenance of a positive reputation among our customers, (ii) development of new products which meet our customer's needs, (iii) obtaining regulatory approvals for our products in key markets, (iv) obtaining patents unpatentedwhich protect our innovations, (v) development and protection of proprietary know-how in severalimportant technological areas, (vi) product quality, safety and cost effectiveness and (vii) continual and rigorous documentation of clinical performance. Other factors are outside of our control. We could see changes in regulatory standards or clinical practice which favor a competitor's technology or reduce revenues in key areas of our business.
In addition, we face competition from several large, global companies with product offerings similar to ours, such as Terumo BCT, Sorin BiomedicaLivaNova Plc and Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA ("Fresenius")KGaA. Terumo and Fresenius, in particular, have significantly greater financial and other resources than we do and are largestrong competitors in a number of our businesses. The following provides an overview of the key competitors in each of our four global competitors with product offerings similar to ours.enterprises.
Plasma
In the automated plasma collection market, we principally compete with the Kabi division of Fresenius, whowhich acquired Fenwal, Inc. in November 2012, on the basis of quality, reliability, ease of use, services and technical features of the collection systems, and on the long-term cost-effectiveness of equipment and disposables. In China, the market is populated by local producers of a product that is intended to be similar to ours. Recently, those competitors have expanded to markets beyond China, into European and South American countries. In the field of Plasma related software, MAK Systems is the primary commercial competitor along with applications developed internally by our customers.
Blood Center
We have several competitors in the Blood Center product lines, some of whomwhich compete across all blood components and otherothers that are more specialized.
Terumo BCT, a combination of Caridian BCT and Terumo Medical Corporation is one ofFresenius are our major competitors in automated platelet collection. Fresenius is another major competitor in this area after their November 2012 acquisitionIn platelet collections, there are two areas of Fenwal.competition - automated collection and pooled random donor. In the automated platelet collection business,area, competition is based on continual performance improvement, as measured by the time and efficiency of platelet collection and the quality of the platelets collected. Each of these companies has taken a different technological approach in designing their systems for automated platelet collection. In theaddition to automated platelet collection market, as a result of the Pall Corporation acquired business product lines,offerings, we now also compete in the pooled random donor platelet segment from whole blood collections from which pooled platelets are derived with the Acrodose product or buffy coat pooling sets.
Terumo BCT and Fresenius (following its acquisition of Fenwal in 2012) are also competitors in the automated red cell collection market. However, it is important to note that most double red cell collection is done in the USU.S. and less than 10% of the 14 million units of red cells collected in the U.S. annually are collected via automation. Therefore, we also compete with the traditional method of collecting red cells from the manual collection of whole blood. As discussed in our Company Overview, we entered the whole blood collections market during fiscal 2013 through the acquisition of the whole blood business from Pall. We compete on the basis of total cost, type-specific collection, process control, product quality, and inventory management.

Our whole blood business faces intense competition on the basis of quality and price. In North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific our main competitors are Fresenius, MacoPharma and Terumo BCT. Haemonetics and Fresenius are market co-leaders in the leukoreducedWe do not have significant whole blood disposables segmentrevenues in North America and Asia Pacific, whereas in Europe, FreseniusJapan today.

In Donor software, Sunquest Information Systems is the market leader. In Japan, Kawasumi is also a strong local competitor. We have a significant competitive cost advantage in the supply of filtration needed in whole blood collection because we are vertically integrated in the production ofcompetitor along with systems developed internally by our own filters. This is unique among our major competitors.customers.

In the cellThe competition for processing market, competitioncells for storage is based on the level of automation, labor-intensiveness, and system type (open versus closed). Open systems may be weaker in good manufacturing process compliance. Moreover, blood processed through open systems has a 24-hour shelf life. With the ACP® (automated cell processor) brand, Haemonetics offers a closed system cell processor which gives blood processed through it, a 14-day shelf life. We compete with Terumo BCT's open systems in this market.

Hospital

Within our hospital business, in the diagnostics market, theThe TEG Thrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer is used primarily in surgical applications. One direct competitor, ROTEM is a direct competitor in Europe and in the United States. Other competitive technologies include standard coagulation tests and platelet function testing. The TEG analyzer competes with other laboratory tests based on its ability to provide a complete picture of a patient's hemostasis at a single point in time, and the ability to measure the clinically relevant platelet function for an individual patient.


7

Table of Contents

In the intraoperative surgical blood salvage market, competition is based on reliability, ease of use, service, support, and price. For high-volume platforms, each manufacturer's technology is similar, and our Cell Saver technology competes principally with LivaNova Plc, Medtronic, Fresenius, and Sorin Biomedica.Fresenius.
In the “perioperative”perioperative surgical blood salvage market, our OrthoPAT and cardioPAT systems competesystem competes primarily against (i) non-automated processing systems whose end product is an unwashed red blood cell unit for transfusion to the patient, and (ii) transfusions of donated blood.blood and (iii) coagulation therapies such as tranexamic acid.
Software Solution

In the software market, we compete with MAK Systems, Mediware, Sunquest Information Systems and applications developed internally by our customers. These companies provide software to blood and plasma collectors and to hospitals for managing donors, collections, and blood units. None of these companies competecompetes with Haemonetics' non-software products.
Our technical staff is highly skilled, but certain competitors have substantially greater financial resources and larger technical staffing at their disposal. There can be no assurance that competitors will not direct substantial efforts and resources toward the development and marketing of products competitive with those of Haemonetics.
Significant Customers
The Japanese Red Cross Society (JRC) represented 10.1% and 13.7%There were no customers that accounted for greater than 10% of our net revenues in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, Grifols S.A., a global healthcare customer, represented approximately 11.0% of our net revenues in 2016, fiscal 2012. Revenue from Grifols S.A. was less than 10% of net revenues in 2015, or fiscal 2013 due to increases in net revenues associated with the August 1, 2012 acquisition of the whole blood transfusion medicine business.2014.
Government Regulation
Medical Device Regulation
The products we manufacture and market are subject to regulation by the Center of Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) and the, Center offor Devices and Radiological Health (“CDRH”) and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research ("CDER") of the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and other non-United States regulatory bodies.
All medical devices introduced to the United States market since 1976 are required by the FDA, as a condition of marketing, to secure either a 510(k) pre-market notification clearance or an approved premarket approval application (“PMA”). In the United States, software used to automate blood center operations and blood collections and to track those components through the system are considered by the FDA to be medical devices, subject to 510(k) pre-market notification. Intravenous solutions (blood anticoagulants and solutions for storage of red blood cells) marketed by us for use with our manual collection and automated systems requires us to obtain an approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) or Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) from CBER.CBER or CDER. A 510(k) pre-market clearance indicates the FDA’s agreement with an applicant’s determination that the product for which clearance is sought is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed medical device. The process of obtaining a 510(k) clearance may involve the submission of clinical data and supporting information. The process of obtaining an NDA approval for solutions is likely to take much longer than 510(k) clearances because the FDA review process is more complicated.
The FDA’s Quality System regulations setsets forth standards for our product design and manufacturing processes, requirerequires the maintenance of certain records and provideprovides for inspections of our facilities. There are also certain requirements of state, local and foreign governments that must be complied with in the manufacturing and marketing of our products. We maintain customer complaint files, record all lot numbers of disposable products, and conduct periodic audits to assure compliance with FDAall regulations. We place special emphasis on customer training and advise all customers that device operation should be undertaken only by qualified personnel.
The FDA can ban certain medical devices; detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices; order repair, replacement or refund of these devices; and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA may also enjoin and restrain certain violations of

the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Safe Medical Devices Act pertaining to medical devices, or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations.
We are also subject to regulation in the countries outside the United States in which we market our products. The member states of the European Union (EU) have adopted the European Medical Device Directives,Directive, which createcreates a single set of medical device regulations for all EU member countries. These regulations require companies that wish to manufacture and distribute medical devices in EU member countries to obtain CE Marking for their products. Outside of the EU, many of the regulations applicable to our products are similar to those of the FDA. However, the national health or social security organizations of certain countries require our products to be registered by those countries before they can be marketed in those countries.

8

Table of Contents

We have complied with these regulations and have obtained such registrations where we market our products. Federal, state and foreign regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of products such as ours are subject to change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes might have on our business.
Conflict Minerals
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act imposes disclosure requirements regarding the use of "Conflict Minerals" mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. The conflict minerals include tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, and their derivatives. These requirements could affect the pricing, sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of our products. There will be additional costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of any conflict minerals used in our products. Our supply chain is complex and we may be unable to verify the origins for all metals used in our products.

Other Regulation
We are also subject to various environmental, health and general safety laws, directives and regulations both in the U.S. and abroad. Our operations, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. We believe that sound environmental, health and safety performance contributes to our competitive strength while benefiting our customers, shareholders and employees.
Environmental Matters
Failure to comply with international, federal and local environmental protection laws or regulations could have an adverse impact on our business or could require material capital expenditures. We continue to monitor changes in U.S. and international environmental regulations that may present a significant risk to the business, including laws or regulations relating to the manufacture or sale of products using plastics.
Employees
As of March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, we employed the full-time equivalent of 3,5633,225 persons assigned to the following functional areas: manufacturing, 2,043;1,845; sales and marketing, 432;688; general and administrative, 418;258; research and development, 318;186; and quality control and field service, 352. We consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.248.
Availability of Reports and Other Information
All of our corporate governance materials, including the Principles of Corporate Governance, the Business Conduct Policy and the charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees are published on the Investor Relations section of our website at http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=72118&p=irol-IRHome. On this websiteweb site the public can also access, free of charge, our annual, quarterly and current reports and other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “designed,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not possible to

predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results.

These forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties includeanticipated, including: the effects of disruption from the acquisition of the Pall whole blood businessmanufacturing transformation making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees customers, vendors and other business partners, unexpected expenses incurred to integrate the Pall whole blood business, our ability to successfully execute on the transformationtimely deliver high quality products, changes in executive management, changes in operations as a result of our manufacturing network and our other value capture and creation activities,global strategic review, asset revaluations to reflect current business conditions, technological advances in the medical field and standards for transfusion medicine and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such advances and standards, demand for whole blood and blood components, product quality, market acceptance, regulatory uncertainties, including the receipt or timing of regulatory approvals, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, blood product reimbursement policies and practices, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers'customers’ ordering patterns including single-source tenders, the effect of industry consolidation as seen in the plasma market,and blood center markets, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate and such other risks describeddetailed under Item 1A. Risk Factors included in this report. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.

9

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Set forth below areIn addition to the risks that we believe are material toother information contained in this Annual Report and the exhibits hereto, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our investors.business. Our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements beginningat the end of Item 1 and Item 7 of this Annual Report.
We recently completed a global strategic review of our business. If our new strategic direction does not yield the expected results or we fail to implement the necessary changes to our operations, we could see material adverse effects on page 9our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We recently undertook a global strategic review of our business portfolio to identify which end markets and 38.product franchises have the strongest growth opportunities. As a result of that review, we organized our current products into four franchises for purposes of evaluating their growth potential: Plasma, Hemostasis Management, Donor and Cell Processing. We concluded that Plasma and Hemostasis Management have the greatest growth potential, while Cell Processing innovation offers an opportunity to increase market share and expand into new segments. We believe Donor is competing in challenging markets which require us to manage the business differently, including reducing costs and the scope of the current product line.
If we have not correctly identified the franchises with greatest growth potential, we will not allocate our resources appropriately which will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Further, if we are unable to reduce costs and complexity in our Donor franchise, we will obtain lower than expected cash flows to fund our future growth and capital needs. This could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations.
If we are unable to successfully expand our product lines through internal research & development and acquisitions, our business may be materially and adversely affected.  
Continued growth of our business depends on our maintaining a pipeline of profitable new products and successful improvements to our existing products. This requires accurate market analysis and carefully targeted application of intellectual and financial resources toward technological innovation or acquisition of new products. The creation and adoption of technological advances is only one step. We must also efficiently develop the technology into a product which confers a competitive advantage, represents a cost effective solution or provides improved patient care. Finally, as a part of the regulatory process of obtaining marketing clearance for new products, we conduct and participate in numerous clinical outcomes. trials, the results of which may be unfavorable, or perceived as unfavorable by the market, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The risks of missteps and set backs are an inherent part of the innovation and development processes in the medical device industry.
If we are unable to successfully grow our business through marketing partnershipsbusiness relationships and acquisitions, our business may be materially and adversely affected.  
Promising partnerships and acquisitions may not be completed for reasons such as competition among prospective partners or buyers, our inability to reach satisfactory terms, or the need for regulatory approvals. Any acquisition that we complete may be dilutive to earnings and require the investment of significant resources. The economic environment may constrain our ability to access the capital needed for acquisitions and other capital investments.
FailureA significant portion of our revenue derives from the sale of blood collection supplies. Declines in the number of blood collection procedures have adversely impacted our business and future declines may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Sales to integrate acquired businessesblood collectors represented 39.7% of our consolidated disposables revenues in fiscal 2016. In certain markets, changes in medical protocols and the development of less invasive, lower blood loss procedures has reduced the number of transfusions of red blood cells, which has in turn led to a decline in the number of blood collection procedures. This is particularly true in the United States where we saw collections decline by approximately 10% and 7% in fiscal 2015 and 2016, respectively. We expect this trend to continue further in fiscal 2017.
In response to this trend, certain large U.S. blood center collection groups pursued single source vendors for whole blood collection products which required significant reductions in average selling prices in order to retain or increase our share of their business. During fiscal 2014, we entered into our operations successfully could adverselya multi-year agreement to supply the HemeXcel Purchasing Alliance, LLC with certain whole blood collection components during the calendar years 2014-2016. The agreement included a reduction in average selling prices which was implemented at the end of first quarter of fiscal 2015. In March 2014, the American Red Cross selected another exclusive supplier to provide certain whole blood products. This reduced annualized revenues by approximately $25.0 million beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.

During the first half of fiscal 2016, the American Red Cross and two group purchasing organizations representing other U.S. blood collectors ("Blood Center GPOs") pursued arrangements for apheresis red cell collections. These negotiations have concluded and will negatively affect our business.red cell revenues and gross margins, a negative impact of approximately $12 million is expected on fiscal 2017 operating income.
The integrationConsolidation of the operationshealthcare providers and blood collectors has increased demand for price concessions and caused the exclusion of acquired businesses requiressuppliers from significant efforts, including the coordination of information technologies, research and development, sales and marketing, operations, manufacturing and finance. These efforts result in additional expenses and involve significant amounts of management's time. Factors that affect the success of acquisitions include the strength of the acquired company's underlying technology and ability to execute, our ability to retain employees, and our ability to achieve synergies, such as increasing sales and achieving cost savings. Our failure to manage successfully and coordinate the growth of the combined acquired companiesmarket segments, which could have an adverse impacteffect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Political, economic and policy influences are causing the healthcare and blood collection industries to make substantial structural and financial changes that will continue affecting our future growth.results of operations. Government and private sector initiatives limiting the growth of healthcare costs and causing healthcare delivery structure reforms, including the reduction in blood use reduced payments for care. These trends have placed greater pricing pressure on suppliers, decreased average selling prices and increased the number of sole source relationships. This pressure impacts our Hospital and Blood Center businesses.
The expansion among hospitals in the United States of group purchasing organizations, integrated delivery networks and large single accounts directly puts price pressure on our Hospital business. It also puts price pressure on our United States Blood Center customers who are also facing reduced demand for red cells. Our Blood Center customers have responded to this pressure by creating their own group purchasing organizations and resorting to single source tenders to create incentives for suppliers, including us, to significantly reduce prices.
We expect that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies, government contracting requirements and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances among our customers and competitors. This may exert further downward pressure on the prices of our products and adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Quality problems with our processes, goods, and services could harm our reputation for producing high-quality products and erode our competitive advantage, sales, and market share.

Quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure. Our quality certifications are critical to the marketing success of our products and services. If we fail to meet these standards or fail to adapt to evolving standards, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose customers, and our revenue and results of operations could decline.
As approximately half of our revenue comes from outside the United States, we are subject to currency fluctuation, geopolitical risk, economic volatility, anti-corruption laws, export and import restrictions, local regulatory authorities and the laws and medical practices in foreign jurisdictions.  
We do business in over 100 countries and have distributors in approximately 90 countries. This exposes us to currency fluctuation, geopolitical risk, economic volatility, anti-corruption laws, export and import restrictions, local regulatory authorities and the laws and medical practices in foreign jurisdictions.
If there are sanctions or restrictions on the flow of capital which prevent product importation or receipt of payments in Russia or China, our business could be adversely affected.
Our international operations are governed by the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and other similar anti-corruption laws in other countries. Generally, these laws which prohibit companies and their business partners or other intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign governments and government officials in order to obtain or retain business. Global enforcement of such anti-corruption laws has increased in recent years, including aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings. While we have an active compliance program and various other safeguards to discourage impermissible practices, we have distributors in 90 countries, several of which are considered high risk for corruption. As a result, our global operations carry some risk of unauthorized impermissible activity on the part of one of our distributors, employees, agents or consultants.  Any alleged or actual violation could subject us to government scrutiny, severe criminal or civil fines, or sanctions on our ability to export product outside the U.S., which could adversely affect our reputation and financial condition.
Export of U.S. technology or goods manufactured in the United States to some jurisdictions requires special U.S. export authorization or local market controls that may be influenced by factors, including political dynamics, outside our control.
Finally, any other significant changes in the competitive, legal, regulatory, reimbursement or economic environments of the jurisdictions in which we conduct our international business could have a material impact on our business.
The implementation


Our future success depends on the continued services of skilled personnel.
We constantly monitor the dynamics of the economy, the healthcare reformindustry and the markets in which we compete; and we continue to assess our key personnel that we believe are essential to our long-term success. Over the last year, we have transitioned to a new Chief Executive Officer, are in the United States may adversely affect us.


10

Tableprocess of Contents

The Patient Protectionhiring a new Chief Financial Officer and Affordable Health Care Act was enacted into lawhave hired new personnel in a number of key executive positions. We have also effected significant organizational and strategic changes in connection therewith. If we fail to effectively manage our ongoing organizational and strategic changes, including the U.S. in March 2010. In addition totimely identification of a medical device tax, effective as of January 2013, the effects of which are considered innew Chief Financial Officer, our financial disclosures, certain other provisionscondition, results of the Act will not be effective until 2014operations, and 2015, and there are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or consequences not fully understood.  We are unable to predict what healthcare programs and regulations will be ultimately implemented at either the federal or state level, but any changes that may decrease reimbursement for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes or increase cost containment measures could adversely impact our business. 
An interruption inreputation, as well as our ability to manufacturesuccessfully attract, motivate and retain key employees, could be harmed.
Our success also depends upon our products or an inabilityability to obtain key components or raw materials may adversely affect our business.
Certain key products are manufactured at single locations, with limited alternate facilities. If an event occurs that results in damage to one or more of our facilities, we may be unable to manufacture the relevant products at previous levels or at all. In addition,attract and retain other qualified managerial and technical personnel. Competition for reasons of quality assurance or cost effectiveness, we purchase certain components and raw materials from sole suppliers. Due to the stringent regulations and requirements of the FDA and other similar non-U.S. regulatory agencies regarding the manufacture of our products, wesuch personnel is intense. We may not be able to quickly establish additional or replacement sourcesattract and retain personnel necessary for certain components or materials. A reduction or interruption in manufacturing, or an inability to secure alternative sourcesthe development of raw materials or components, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.business.
If we are unable to meet our debt obligations or experience a disruption in our cash flows, it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, ability to complete our share repurchase program or cost of borrowing.
We incurred $475.0have $408.1 million in of debt to acquire the whole blood business.outstanding at April 2, 2016. The obligations to pay interest and repay the borrowed amounts may restrict our ability to adjust to adverse economic conditions, our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisition or other general corporate requirements. The interest rate on the loan is variable and subject to change based on market forces. Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our profitability and cash flows.
In addition, as a global corporation we have significant cash reserves held in foreign countries. These balances may not be immediately available to repay our debt or may only be available after paying significant taxes.debt.
Our credit facilities contain financial covenants that require us to maintain specified financial ratios and make interest and principal payments. If we are unable to satisfy these covenants, we may be required to obtain waivers from our lenders and no assurance can be made that our lenders would grant such waivers on favorable terms, or at all, and we could be required to repay any borrowed amounts on short notice.
Additional capital that we may require in the future may not be available to us, or only available to us on unfavorable terms.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including operating requirements, current and future acquisitions and the need to refinance existing debt. Our ability to issue additional debt or enter into other financing arrangements on acceptable terms could be adversely affected by our debt levels, unfavorable changes in economic conditions generally or uncertainties that affect the capital markets. Higher borrowing costs or the inability to access capital markets could adversely affect our ability to support future growth and operating requirements and, as a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. As of April 2, 2016, we had $408.1 million of debt obligations due prior to July 1, 2019. Refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources within our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion on debt obligations.
We recorded goodwill and other asset impairment charges during the current fiscal year and may record additional charges in future periods.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded that indicators of potential goodwill impairment were present for the EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units, therefore requiring an interim test for goodwill impairment. We recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $66.3 million in the EMEA reporting unit during the third quarter of fiscal 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our goodwill impairment test and concluded that no adjustment to the $66.3 million impairment loss initially recorded was required. The impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 represented the entire goodwill balance allocated to EMEA. This charge does not impact our liquidity, cash flows from operations, future operations, or compliance with debt covenants. Although the analysis indicated only the EMEA reporting unit was impaired, we will continue to monitor the Americas Blood Center and Hospital, which has an excess fair value over carrying value of approximately 25.8% and has allocated goodwill of $175.9 million, as this operating unit is most at risk in future periods if our estimated future cash flows differ from our actual operating results.
Additionally, during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 we recorded an impairment charge of $18.7 million to write down the carrying value of the SOLX intangible assets after we updated our assessment of the market potential for the SOLX technology and concluded that it was no longer commercially reasonable to bring this technology to market.
Finally, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our global strategic review which resulted in the identification of certain long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that were at risk of being impaired due

to changes in the strategic direction of the Company. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we performed impairment tests for each of the identified assets and based on revised expectations, we recorded asset impairment charges of $16.2 million.
Goodwill impairment charges or other asset impairment charges could materially adversely impact our results of operations in the period in which they are recorded. We will continue to monitor our intangible assets for potential impairments in future periods. Refer to Critical Accounting Policies within our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of key assumptions used in our testing.
As a medical device manufacturer we are subject to a number of laws and regulations. Non-compliance with those laws or regulations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  
The manufacture, distribution and marketing of our products are subject to regulation by the FDA and other non-United States regulatory bodies. We must obtain specific regulatory clearance prior to selling any new product or service, a process which is costly and time consuming. If we are unable to obtain the necessary regulatory clearance we will be unable to introduce new enhanced product. Our operations are also subject to continuous review and monitoring by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Failure to substantially comply with applicable regulations could subject our products to recall or seizure by government authorities, or an order to suspend manufacturing activities. As well, ifIf our products were determined to have design or manufacturing flaws, this could result in their recall or seizure. Either of these situations could also result in the imposition of fines.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial means and resources, which may allow them to more rapidly develop new technologies and more quickly address changes in customer requirements.  
Our ability to remain competitive depends on a combination of factors. Certain factors are within our control such as reputation, regulatory approvals, patents, unpatented proprietary know-how in several technological areas, product quality, safety, cost effectiveness and continued rigorous documentation of clinical performance. Other factors are outside of our control such as regulatory standards, medical standards, reimbursement policies and practices, and the practice of medicine.
Loss of a significant customer could adversely affect our business.
In fiscal 20132016, although no one customer represented more than 10% of our revenues, our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 44%36.0% of our revenue. If any of our largest customers materially reduce their purchases from us or terminate their relationship with us for any reason, we could experience an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our largest customer,We may not continue to realize the Japanese Red Cross Society (JRC), represented 10.1%benefits from our Value Creation and Capture initiatives.
In fiscal 2016, we completed our multi-year Value Creation and Capture initiatives. These initiatives have reduced manufacturing costs and improved supply chain efficiency. However, there are no assurances the cost savings or supply chain efficiencies will continue as our business evolves. In addition, the activities involved the relocation of several product lines to new manufacturing facilities. As these transitions are completed, we may yet experience challenges with the new manufacturing locations, additional costs, or unacceptable quality. These may lead to additional working capital, warranty or inventory costs.
An interruption in our ability to manufacture our products or an inability to obtain key components or raw materials may adversely affect our business.
Certain key products are manufactured at single locations, with limited alternate facilities. If an event occurs that results in damage to one or more of our revenues in fiscal 2013. Becausefacilities, we may be unable to manufacture the relevant products at previous levels or at all. In addition, for reasons of quality assurance or cost effectiveness, we purchase certain finished goods, components and raw materials from sole suppliers, notably JMS Co. Ltd., Kawasumi Laboratories and Sanmina Corporation. Due to the stringent regulations and requirements of the sizeFDA and other similar non-U.S. regulatory agencies regarding the manufacture of this relationshipour products, we could experience a significantmay not be able to quickly establish additional or replacement sources for certain components or materials. A reduction or interruption in revenue if the JRC decidedmanufacturing, or an inability to significantly reduce its purchases from us for any reason, including a desire to rebalance its purchases between vendors,secure alternative sources of raw materials or if we are unable to obtain

11

Table of Contents

and maintain necessary regulatory approvals in Japan. We alsocomponents, could have a concentrationmaterial adverse effect on our business, results of credit risk due to our outstanding accounts receivable balances with the JRC.

operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Current or worsening economic conditions may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
A portion of our trade accounts receivable outside the United States include sales to government-owned or supported healthcare systems in several countries, which are subject to payment delays. Payment is dependent upon the financial stability and creditworthiness of those countries’ national economies. WeWorsening economic conditions may lead to the rationing of care or reduced order patterns. Although, we have not incurred significant losses on government receivables. Wereceivables to date, we continually evaluate all government receivables for potential collection risks associated with the availability of government funding and reimbursement practices. If the financial condition of customers or the countries’ healthcare systems deteriorate such that their ability to make payments is uncertain, allowances may be required in future periods.
Deteriorating credit and economic conditions in parts of Western Europe, particularly in Italy where our net accounts receivable is $23.4 million as of March 30, 2013, may increase the average length of time it takes us to collect our accounts receivable in certain regions within these countries.
We may not realize the expected benefits from our Manufacturing Network Optimization Program; our long-term plans will result in higher short-term expenses and require more cash expenditures.
In May 2013, we announced a multi-year Manufacturing Network Optimization Program which is intended to reduce our manufacturing costs by changing our current manufacturing footprint and supply chain strategy. We expect the program will reduce manufacturing costs and improve supply chain efficiency when complete. However, there are no assurances these cost savings or supply chain efficiencies will be achieved, and implementation of the program could introduce risks such as management distraction, business disruption, and attrition beyond our planned reduction in workforce and reduced employee productivity which may reduce our revenue or increase our costs. Additionally, implementing the program will result in charges and expenses that impact our operating results and increase our level of capital expenditures.
As a global corporation, we are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could adversely affect our cash flows and results of operations.  
International revenues and expenses account for a substantial portion of our operations and we intend to continue expanding our presence in international markets. In fiscal 20132016, our international revenues accounted for 49.0%42.9% of our total revenues. The exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates takes different forms. Reported revenues, for sales, as well as manufacturing and operational costs denominated in foreign currencies by our international businesses, fluctuate due to exchange rate movement when translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Fluctuations in exchange rates could adversely affect our profitability in U.S. dollars of products and services sold by us into international markets, where payment for our products and services and related manufacturing and operational costs is made in local currencies.
We are entrusted with sensitive personal information relating to surgical patients, blood donors, employees and other persons in the course of operating our business and serving our customers.
Government agencies require that we implement measures to ensure the integrity and security of such personal data and, in the event of a breach of protocol, we inform affected individuals. If our systems are not properly designed or implemented, or should suffer a breach of security or an intrusion (e.g., “hacking”) by unauthorized persons, the Company’s reputation could be harmed, and it could incur costs and liabilities to affected persons and enforcement agencies.
We rely on the proper function, availability and security of information technology systems to operate our business and to serve our customers and a cyber-attack or other breach of these systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We rely on information technology systems to process, transmit, and store electronic information in our day-to-day operations. Similar to other large multi-national companies, the size and complexity of our information technology systems makes them vulnerable to a cyber-attack, malicious intrusion, breakdown, destruction, loss of data privacy, or other significant disruption. Our information systems require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain, protect, and enhance existing systems and develop new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology, evolving systems and regulatory standards, the increasing need to protect patient and customer information, and changing customer patterns. In addition, third parties may attempt to hack into our products to obtain data relating to patients with our products or our proprietary information. Any failure by us to maintain or protect our information technology systems and data integrity, including from cyber-attacks, intrusions or other breaches, could result in the unauthorized access to patient data and personally identifiable information, theft of intellectual property or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and disrupt our operations. Any of these events, in turn, may cause us to lose existing customers, have difficulty preventing, detecting, and controlling fraud, have disputes with customers, physicians, and other health care professionals, be subject to legal claims and liability, have regulatory sanctions or penalties imposed, have increases in operating expenses, incur expenses or lose revenues as a result of a data privacy breach or theft of intellectual property, or suffer other adverse consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to the risks associated with communicable diseases. A significant outbreak of a disease could reduce the demand for our products and affect our ability to provide our customers with products and services.  
An eligible donor’s willingness to donate is affected by concerns about their personal health and safety. Concerns about communicable diseases (such as pandemic flu, SARS, or HIV) could reduce the number of donors, and accordingly reduce the demand for our products for a period of time. A significant outbreak of a disease could also affect our employees’ ability to work, which could limit our ability to produce product and service our customers.
There is a risk that the Company’s intellectual property may be subject to misappropriation in some countries.  
Certain countries, particularly China, do not enforce compliance with laws that protect intellectual property (“IP”) rights with the same degree of vigor as is available under the U.S. and European systems of justice. Further, certain of the Company’s IP rights are not registered in China, or if they were, have since expired. This may permit others to produce copies of products in China that are not covered by currently valid patent registrations. There is also a risk that such products may be exported from China to other countries.
In order to aggressively protect our intellectual propertyIP throughout the world, we have a program of patent disclosures and filings in markets where we conduct significant business. While we believe this program is reasonable and adequate, the risk of loss is inherent in litigation as different legal systems offer different levels of protection to intellectual property,IP, and it is still possible that even patented technologies may not be protected absolutely from infringement.

Pending and future intellectual property litigation could be costly and disruptive to us.
We operate in an industry that is susceptible to significant intellectual property litigation. We are currently pursuing intellectual property infringement claims described in more detail under Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 10- Commitments and Contingencies to our fiscal 2013 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8This type of this Annual Report. Intellectual

12

Table of Contents

property litigation is expensive, complex and lengthy and its outcome is difficult to predict. Patent litigation may result in adverse outcomes and could significantly divert the attention of our technical and management personnel.
The technologies that support our products are the subject of active patent prosecution.
There is a risk that one or more of our products may be determined to infringe a patent held by another party. If this were to occur we may be subject to an injunction or to payment of royalties, or both, which may adversely affect our ability to market the affected product(s). In addition, competitors may patent technological advances which may give them a competitive advantage or create barriers to entry.
We sell our products in certain emerging economies.  
There are risks with doing business in emerging economies, such as Brazil, Russia, India and China. These economies tend to have less mature product regulatory systems, and more volatile financial markets. In addition, the government controlled health care system's ability to invest in our products and systems may abruptly shift due to changing government priorities or funding capacity. Our ability to sell products in these economies is dependent upon our ability to hire qualified employees or agents to represent our products locally, and our ability to obtain and maintain the necessary regulatory approvals in a less mature regulatory environment. If we are unable to retain qualified representatives or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals, we will not be able to continue to sell products in these markets. We are exposed to a higher degree of financial risk if we extend credit to customers in these economies.
In many of the international markets in which we do business, including certain parts of Europe, South America, the Middle East, Russia and Asia, our employees, agents or distributors offer to sell our products in response to public tenders issued by various governmental agencies.  
There is additional risk in selling our products through agents or distributors, particularly in public tenders. If they misrepresent our products, do not provide appropriate service and delivery, or commit a violation of local or U.S. law, our reputation could be harmed, and we could be subject to fines, sanctions or both.
We have a complex internationalglobal supply chain.chain which includes key sole source suppliers.  
We have a complex global supply chain which involves integrating key suppliers and our manufacturing capacity into a global movement of components and finished goods.
We have certain key suppliers, including JMS Co. Ltd. ("JMS"), Kawasumi Laboratories ("Kawasumi") and Sanmina Corporation, who have their own complex supply chains. JMS and Kawasumi make certain finished goods and important sub components in locations throughout Asia. We have engaged Sanmina Corporation to be the sole manufacturer of certain equipment as part of our manufacturing network optimization activities.
Any disruption to one or more of our suppliers’ production or delivery of sufficient volumes of subcomponents conforming to our specifications could disrupt or delay our ability to deliver finished products to our customers. For example, we purchase components in Asia for use in manufacturing in the United States, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Scotland. We also regularly ship finished goods from the United States, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Scotland to Europe and Asia.
Plastics are the principal component of our disposables, which are the main source of our revenues. Any change in the price, composition or availability of the plastics we purchase could adversely affect our business.
We have three risks with this key raw material: price, composition and availability.
Increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to procure plastic raw materials. Increases in the costs of other commodities may affect our procurement costs to a lesser degree.
The technologies that support our productscomposition of the plastic we purchase is also important. Today, we purchase plastics which contain phthalates, which are the subject of active patent prosecution.
There is a risk that one or more of our products may be determinedused to infringe a patent held by another party. If this weremake plastic malleable. Should plastics with phthalates become unavailable due to occurregulatory changes, we may be subjectrequired to an injunctionobtain new FDA or to paymentforeign approvals for a number of royalties, or both, which may adversely affectproducts.
While we have not experienced shortages in the past, any interruption in the supply for certain plastics could have a material impact on our business by limiting our ability to marketmanufacture and sell the affected product(s). In addition, competitors may patent technological advancesproducts which may give themrepresent a competitive advantage or create barriers to entry.significant portion of our revenues.

Our products are made with materials which are subject to regulation by governmental agencies.  
Environmental regulations may prohibit the use of certain compounds in products we market and sell in regulated markets. If we are unable to substitute suitable materials into our processes, our manufacturing operations may be disrupted. In addition, we may be obligated to disclose the origin of certain materials used in our products, including but not limited to, metals mined from locations which have been the site of human rights violations.
We are entrusted with sensitive personal information relating to surgical patients, blood donors, employees and other persons in the course of operating our business and serving our customers.
Government agencies require that we implement measures to ensure the integrity and security of such personal data and, in the event of a breach of protocol, we inform affected individuals. If our systems are not properly designed or implemented, or should suffer a breach of security or an intrusion (e.g., “hacking”) by unauthorized persons, the Company’s reputation could be harmed, and it could incur costs and liabilities to affected persons and enforcement agencies.
We operate in an industry susceptible to significant product liability claims.  
Our products are relied upon by medical personnel in connection with the treatment of patients and the collection of blood from donors. In the event that patients or donors sustain injury or death in connection with their condition or treatment, we, along with others, may be sued, and whether or not we are ultimately determined to be liable, we may incur significant legal expenses. These claims may be brought by individuals seeking relief on their own behalf or purporting to represent a class. In addition, product liability claims may be asserted against us in the future based on events we are not aware of at the present time.

13

Table of Contents

In addition, such litigation could damage our reputation and, therefore, impair our ability to market our products, and obtain professional or product liability insurance. This causesinsurance, or increase the premiums forcost of such insurances to increase. As such, we carry product liability coverage.insurance. While we believe that our current product liability insurance coverage is sufficient, there is no assurance that such coverage will be adequate to cover incurred liabilities. Moreover,liabilities or that we maywill be unableable to obtain acceptable product and professional liability coverage.
Consolidationcoverage in the healthcare industry could leadfuture.
We have disclosed a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to increased demandour accounting for price concessions or the exclusion of suppliers from significant market segments,income taxes, which could have an adverse effect onadversely affect our business,ability to report our financial condition, and results of operations.operations or cash flows accurately and on a timely basis.
The costsIn connection with our assessment of healthcare have risen significantlyinternal controls over financial reporting under Section 404 of the past decade. Numerous initiativesSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to our accounting for income taxes. For a discussion of our internal controls over financial reporting and reform by legislators, regulatorsa description of the identified material weakness, see "Controls and third-party payorsProcedures" in Part II, Item 9A of this Report.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management's assessment identified control deficiencies associated with the transition from utilizing tax consultants to curb these costs have resulted in a consolidation trendestablishing expanded in-house tax capabilities and resources, as well as issues in the healthcare industry. This consolidation has resulteddesign and implementation of controls to review and analyze the Company's income tax provisions, income taxes payable and receivable, and deferred income tax balances that led management to conclude that control deficiencies existed at April 2, 2016. While reported tax provisions and related accounts are believed to be accurate, as a result of these deficiencies, until they are substantially remediated, it is possible that internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect errors in greater pricing pressure, decreased average selling pricesthe tax accounting reflected in our financial statements from occurring that could be material, either individually or in the aggregate.
While actions have been taken to improve our internal controls in response to the identified material weakness related to certain aspects of accounting for income taxes, additional work continues to address and remediate the exclusion of certain suppliers from important market segments. For example, group purchasing organizations, integrated delivery networksidentified material weakness. Until these actions are fully implemented and large single accounts continuetested, a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting relating to consolidate purchasing decisions for some of our hospital customers. We expect market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies, government contracting requirements and societal pressuresincome taxes will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances amongexist. As a result, our customers and competitors. This may exert further downward pressureability to accurately report, on the prices ofa timely basis, our products and adversely impact our business,future financial condition, or results of operations.operations or cash flows may be adversely affected.

14


ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our owned headquarters facility, which the Company owns, is located on 14 acres in Braintree, Massachusetts. This facility is located in a light industrial parkBraintree, Massachusetts and was constructed in the 1970s. The building isconsists of two buildings which are approximately 180,000 and 44,000 square feet,feet. As of which 70,000April 2, 2016, we owned or leased a total of 68 facilities. Our owned and leased facilities consist of approximately 1.8 million square feetfeet. Included within these properties are devoted8 manufacturing facilities. We believe all of these facilities are well-maintained and suitable for the operation conducted in them. We consider the following manufacturing facilities to manufacturing and quality control operations, 35,000 square feetbe material to warehousing, 72,000 square feet for administrative and research, development and engineering activities.the business.
The Company leasesLeetsdale, Pennsylvania is an 81,929approximately 82,000 square foot leased facility in Leetsdale, Pennsylvania. This facilitywhich is used for warehousing, distribution and manufacturing operations primarily supporting our plasma business. Annual lease expense is $383,970approximately $0.4 million for this facility.
The Company leases 99,931Draper, Utah is an approximately 100,000 square feet in Draper, Utah. Thisfoot owned facility is used for the manufacturing and distribution of plasma disposable products. Annual lease expense is $495,498.
The Company owns a facility in Union, South Carolina. This facility is used to manufacture sterile solutions that support our blood center and plasma businesses. The facility is approximately 69,300 square feet.
The Company leases a facility in Niles, Illinois, which performs research and manufacturing operations supporting our plasma business. During fiscal 2015, the Company purchased this facility for the Company. This facility is 16,478 square feet of office and manufacturing space. Annual lease expense is $153,523.
The Company owns a facility in Bothwell, Scotland used to manufacture disposable components for European customers. This facility is approximately 40,200 square feet.
The Company leases 26,264 square feet of office space in Signy, Switzerland. This facility is used for sales, marketing, finance and other administrative services, as well as supply chain and procurement management activities related to our manufacturing operations. Annual lease expense for this space is $900,000.$6.6 million.
The Company leases a facility in Fajardo, Puerto Rico that is approximately 114,860115,000 square feet under an agreement with Pall Corporation executed in connection with the Company's acquisition of Pall's transfusion medicine business on August 1, 2012. This facility is used for production of blood filters. We recorded a $2.1 million capital lease under purchase accounting for this property for which we are recording approximately $0.2 million of depreciation expense annually.
The Company owns a facility in Ascoli, Italy,Bothwell, Scotland used to manufacture disposable products for the production of whole blood collection kits.our European and Asian customers. This facility is 87,188approximately 40,000 square feet.
The Company leases 126,569127,000 square feet of space in Tijuana, Mexico used for the production of blood collection sets used for collection, handling and storage of whole blood.with an Annual lease expense isof approximately $327,360.
The Company owns two facilities in Covina, California that occupy 70,781 square feet, dedicated to manufacturing, R&D and engineering functions. The facilities also include general administration space.$0.7 million. The Company also leases 40,400 square feet of space for warehousing and logistic operations. Annual lease expenseowns a facility in Tijuana, Mexico that is approximately $264,450.182,000 square feet. These facilities are used for the production of whole blood collection kits.kits, blood center and hospital disposables, and intra-plant components.
The Company alsoowns approximately 240,000 square feet of space in Penang, Malaysia used to manufacture disposable products for our European and Asian customers. The Company leases administration, sales, marketing, service,the land on which the facility was built and distributionthe lease payments have been prepaid. The lease term of 30 years expires in 2043 with an option to renew for a period of no less than 10 years.
The Company's facilities in locations aroundare used by the world.following business segments:
Number of Facilities
Japan12
EMEA16
North America Plasma3
All Other37
Total68

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although our ultimate liability cannot be determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
Fenwal (Fresenius) Patent InfringementItalian Employment Litigation
ForOur Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by employees of the past six years,facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy where we have pursued patent infringement lawsuits against Fenwal Inc. seeking an injunctionceased manufacturing operations. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and damages fromminimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their infringementnational collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of a Haemonetics patent, through the salelow demand, are void, and (iii) payment of the ALYX brand automated red cell collection system,extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.

In addition, a competitor of our automated red cell collection systems.
Currently, we are pursuing a patent infringement actionunion represented in Germany against Fenwal, and its European and German subsidiary. On September 20, 2010, we filed a patent infringement action in Germany. In response, Fenwalthe Ascoli plant has filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to invalidaterecall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the Haemonetics patent whichunion from certain meetings.
Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.
As of April 2, 2016, the total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $4.6 million; however, it is not possible at this point in the subjectproceedings to accurately evaluate the likelihood or amount of this infringement action on December 1, 2010.any potential losses. We may receive other similar claims in the future.

15


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

NoneNone.

ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information concerning our Executive Officers is as follows. Executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer of Haemonetics Corporation.
PETER ALLENRONALD GELBMAN (age 54), President, Global Plasma joined Haemonetics in 2003 as President68) Interim Chief Executive Officer September 2015 to May 2016, has been a member of the Donor Division. In March 2008,Haemonetics Board of Directors since 2000 and, until his appointment as Interim CEO in September of 2015, was Chair of the Governance and Compliance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Allen was appointed Chief Marketing Officer. In October 2011, he was promoted to PresidentGelbman is a former member of Global Plasma. Prior to joining Haemonetics, Mr. Allen was Vice Presidentthe Executive Committee of The Aethena Group, a private equity firm providing services toJohnson & Johnson, and served as Worldwide Chairman of the global healthcare industry. From 1998 to 2001, he held various positions including Vice President of SalesPharmaceuticals and the Oncology Business at Syncor International, a provider of radiopharmaceutical and comprehensive medical imaging services.  Previously, Mr. Allen held executive level positions in sales, marketing, and operations in DataMedic, Inc., Enterprise Systems, Inc./HBOC, and Robertson Lowstuter, Inc. Mr. Allen has also worked in sales and marketing at American Hospital Supply Corporation and Baxter International, Inc.Diagnostics Group.
BRIAN CONCANNONCHRISTOPHER SIMON (age 55) ,(age 52) President and Chief Executive Officer joined Haemonetics in 2003May, 2016. Mr. Simon previously served as Presidenta Senior Partner of the Patient Division. He was promoted to President ofMcKinsey & Company in Global Markets in 2006 and then to Chief Operating Officer in 2007. In April 2009, he was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer, and elected to the Haemonetics Board of Directors. Immediately prior to joining Haemonetics, Mr. Concannon was President of the Northeast Region at Cardinal Health Medical Products Practice. Mr. Simon was a consultant with McKinsey & Company since 1993 and Services where herecently was employed since 1998. From 1985 to 1998, he was employed by American Hospital Supply Corporation, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, and Allegiance Healthcare in a series of sales and operations management positions of increasing responsibility.
SUSAN HANLON (age 45), Vice President Finance and Chief Accounting Officer joined our Company in 2002 as Vice President and Corporate Controller. In 2004, she was promoted to Vice President Planning and Control, and in 2008, Ms. Hanlon was promoted to Vice President Finance. She presently has responsibilitythe Lead Partner for Controllership, Financial Planning, Tax, and Treasury.McKinsey & Company’s current strategy review with Haemonetics. Prior to joining Haemonetics, Ms. Hanlon was a partner with Arthur Andersen LLPthat, he served in Boston.
DAVID HELSEL (age 49) Executive Vice President, Global Manufacturing joined Haemonetics as Vice President of Global Manufacturing in March 2012, and is responsible for worldwide oversight of the Company’s manufacturing and supply chain organizations. Mr. Helsel was previously with Covidien, Ltd. for 16 years, where he most recently was Vice President of Operations for the Surgical Solutions global business unit. During his tenure with Covidien, his previouscommercial roles included Vice President of Operations for the Medical Supplies segment and Global Director of Operational Excellence – Manufacturing. Mr. Helsel holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from LeTourneau University.
SANDRA JESSE (age 60) Chief Legal Officer joined Haemonetics as Vice President, Chief Legal Officer in September 2011, and is responsible for the company’s world-wide Legal, Compliance and Corporate Audit and Controls groups. Ms. Jesse was previously the Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a Partner in the Boston law firm of Choate, Hall and Stewart, and Press Secretary for United States Congressman, Lee Hamilton. She has served on a number of Boards of Directors, including the New England Legal Foundation, Longy School of Music, Boston Harbor Island Alliance and the Landmark School. Ms. Jesse is a former President of the Boston Bar Foundation.
MICHAEL KELLY (age 49) President, Global Markets, joined Haemonetics in 2010 as President of North America and the Global Plasma business. In 2011, his responsibilities expanded to include the Software and Global Marketing functions and his title changed to President of North America. In June of 2012, Mr. Kelly was promoted to President of Global Markets in charge of overseeing all of the Sales and Marketing activities for our Donor, Patient, and Software products globally, as well as the Global Marketing function. Prior to joining Haemonetics, he was Senior Vice President and General Manager of Infection Prevention for CareFusion Corporation. Mr. Kelly spent several years with Cardinal Health in a variety of general management, marketing, business development, and sales positions. He began his career with Baxter Healthcare as a Sales Representative in 1991.Corporation.
CHRISTOPHER LINDOP (age 55)58) Executive Vice President, Business Development and Chief Financial Officer joined Haemonetics in January of 2007 as Chief Financial Officer.Officer and has announced his retirement from Haemonetics effective June 3, 2016. In 2007, Mr. Lindop assumed responsibility for business development. Prior to joining Haemonetics, he was Chief Financial Officer at Inverness Medical Innovations, a rapidly growing global developer of advanced consumer and professional diagnostic products from 2003 to 2006. Prior to this, Mr. Lindop was a Partner in the Boston offices of Ernst & Young LLP and Arthur Andersen LLP.

16


KATHLEEN MCDANIELKENT DAVIES (age 49)53) Chief Operating Officer joined Haemonetics as President, Global Markets in April 2014. In April 2015, he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. In this role, he is responsible for worldwide oversight of all of Haemonetics’ commercial operations, including product development and product management. Previously, Mr. Davies was the Chief Executive Officer of RoundTable Healthcare Partners' RoundTable III Platform Development Corporation ("RPDC") where he focused on the identification and development of new investment opportunities in the medical device market.
DAVID FUSCO (age 42) Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources joined Haemonetics in March 2013 as EVP,July, 2015. Mr. Fusco is responsible for Haemonetics' global human capital programs including talent management, organization development, total rewards and the human resources business partner support program aimed at advancing our employee engagement and culture. Previously, Mr. Fusco was the Vice President of Human Resources of Parexel International where he was responsible for the Global Human Resources.Resources business partner management and the enterprise wide human capital programs.
SANDRA JESSE (age 63) Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer joined Haemonetics as Vice President, Chief Legal Officer in September 2011, and is responsible for the company’s Legal, Compliance and Corporate Audit and Controls groups. Ms. McDanielJesse was previously the Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, a Partner in the Boston law firm of Choate, Hall and Stewart, and Press Secretary for a United States Congressman, Lee Hamilton.
NEIL RYDING (age 55) Executive Vice President, Global Operations joined Haemonetics in September, 2015. Prior to joining Haemonetics, Mr. Ryding had over 30 years of experience in leading global manufacturing operations and supply chain

organizations in regulated environments within the aerospace and medical device industries. Mr. Ryding’s previous experience includes various roles with Rolls Royce Aero-Engines, Johnson & Johnson, Smith & Nephew, Cardinal Health and Hospira.
BYRON SELMAN (age 49) President, Global Markets joined Haemonetics in 2012 as President, North America. In January of 2015, Mr. Selman was promoted to President, Americas. Mr. Selman was then promoted to President, Global Markets in April 2015. Mr. Selman was previously with Pall Corporation for 21 years where he most recently served as worldwide VPPresident of Human Resources for DePuy Synthes, a Johnson & Johnson Company. Prior to Depuy, Ms. McDaniel was an ExecutiveGlobal Medical.
DAN GOLDSTEIN (age 39) Vice President at Fleet Credit Card Services. She has over 25 years of broad global HR leadership experience having held executive, senior human resources generalist and compensation positions at leading computer and financial services companies.
WARREN NIGHAN (age 44) Executive Vice President, Quality Assurance and Regulatory AssuranceCorporate Controller, joined Haemonetics in November2016. In April of 2010 as2016, Mr. Goldstein was appointed principal accounting officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Goldstein was Vice President Technical Accounting and Advisory Services for Covidien PLC, a global health care products company. At Covidien, Mr. Goldstein had previously held the roles of Worldwide Quality & Regulatory Affairs. Mr. Nighan previously served as Vice President of Quality & Regulatory for St. Jude Medical in Minneapolis, Minnesota.Business Unit Controller, Sustainable Technologies and Director, Corporate Reporting. Prior to that, heCovidien, Mr. Goldstein held numerous roles of increasing responsibility in qualitypositions at EMC Corporation and regulatory affairs at Covidien, Tyco Healthcare, and Kendall Healthcare. Mr. Nighan holds a bachelor’s degree in nursing from Northeastern University.Calpine Corporation.
DR. JONATHAN WHITE (age 53) Chief Science and Technology Officer joined Haemonetics in 2008 as Vice President of Research and Development.  Dr. White joined Haemonetics from Pfizer where he held a number of roles including Chief Information Officer. He previously worked at McKinsey and Company in New York. Dr. White is a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgery in England.

17


PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HAE. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices of such common stock, which represent actual transactions as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. On November 30, 2012 the Company completed a two-for-one split of its common stock in the form of a stock dividend. Unless otherwise indicated, all common stock shares and per share information referenced below have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split. The exercise price of each outstanding option has also been proportionately and retroactively adjusted for all periods presented. Par value per share and authorized shares were however not affected by the stock split.

First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2013: 
  
  
  
Fiscal year ended April 2, 2016: 
  
  
  
Market price of Common Stock: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
High$37.06
 $40.70
 $41.38
 $44.44
$45.32
 $42.24
 $34.63
 $35.67
Low$33.44
 $34.32
 $38.92
 $40.78
$39.69
 $34.13
 $29.70
 $29.20
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2012: 
  
  
  
Fiscal year ended March 28, 2015: 
  
  
  
Market price of Common Stock: 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
High$35.10
 $34.59
 $32.29
 $35.16
$35.73
 $37.13
 $39.07
 $45.43
Low$31.21
 $28.02
 $27.50
 $30.92
$29.86
 $33.92
 $33.75
 $36.48
Holders
There were approximately 272181 holders of record of the Company’s common stock as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016.
Dividends
The Company has never paid cash dividends on shares of its common stock and does not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.


Stock Performance

















18

Table of Contents

The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return provided to shareholders on Haemonetics Corporation’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index and the S&P Health Care Equipment index. An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each of the indexes on 3/29/20084/2/2011 and its relative performance is tracked through 3/30/20134/2/2016.


* 
$100 invested on 3/29/084/2/2011 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ended March 30.April 2, 2016.
 3/08 3/09 3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 4/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 4/16
Haemonetics Corporation 100.00
 92.45
 95.94
 110.00
 116.95
 139.85
 100.00
 104.69
 125.18
 96.48
 132.84
 106.04
S&P 500 100.00
 60.32
 88.41
 100.24
 106.48
 118.64
 100.00
 105.71
 117.77
 139.42
 154.68
 155.57
S&P Health Care Equipment 100.00
 68.74
 95.94
 97.34
 101.08
 113.56
 100.00
 106.08
 119.18
 148.88
 184.83
 178.92
Note: The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. This graph shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In the August 1, 2012 press release,None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 28, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $50.0$100.0 million worth of Company shares, subject to compliance with its loan covenants. We completed this repurchase program during the second quarter of fiscal year 2013. During the three months endedMarch 30, 2013, the Company2016. In total, we repurchased 694,644approximately 2.7 million shares at a total cost of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $28.8$100.0 million. under this plan. We reflect stock repurchases

19

Table of Contents

in our financial statements on a trade date“trade date” basis and as Authorized Unissued. HaemoneticsUnissued (Haemonetics is a Massachusetts company and under Massachusetts law repurchased shares are treated as authorized but unissued, rather than treasury shares.
unissued). All of the purchases during the quarter were made under the publicly announced program. All purchasesprogram and were made in the open market.
Period 
Total Number
of Shares
Repurchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
including
Commissions
 
Total Dollar Value
of Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
12/30/2012-1/26/2013 160,365
 $41.81
 $6,704,229
 $22,133,953
1/27/2013-2/23/2013 291,650
 $41.54
 $12,114,521
 $10,019,432
2/24/2013-3/30/2013 242,629
 $41.30
 $10,019,432
 $
Total 694,644
 $41.52
 $28,838,182
  


20

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Haemonetics Corporation and Subsidiaries Five-Year Review
(In thousands, except per share and employee data)2013 2012 2011 2010 20092016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Summary of Operations 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Net revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
 $645,430
 $597,879
$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
 $891,990
 $727,844
Cost of goods sold463,859
 358,604
 321,485
 307,949
 289,709
502,918
 475,955
 470,144
 463,859
 358,604
Gross profit428,131
 369,240
 355,209
 337,481
 308,170
405,914
 434,418
 468,365
 428,131
 369,240
Operating expenses: 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Research and development44,394
 36,801
 32,656
 26,376
 23,859
44,965
 54,187
 54,200
 44,394
 36,801
Selling, general and administrative323,053
 245,261
 213,899
 214,483
 198,744
317,223
 337,168
 365,977
 323,053
 245,835
Contingent consideration income
 (1,580) (1,894) (2,345) 
Asset write-down4,247
 
 
 15,686
 
Impairment of assets92,395
 5,441
 1,711
 4,247
 
Contingent consideration (income) expense(4,727) (2,918) 45
 
 (2,154)
Total operating expenses371,694
 280,482
 244,661
 254,200
 222,603
449,856
 393,878
 421,933
 371,694
 280,482
Operating income56,437
 88,758
 110,548
 83,281
 85,567
Other income (expense), net(6,540) 740
 (467) (2,010) (565)
Income before provision for income taxes49,897
 89,498
 110,081
 81,271
 85,002
Operating (loss) income(43,942) 40,540
 46,432
 56,437
 88,758
Other (expense) income, net(9,474) (9,375) (10,031) (6,540) 740
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes(53,416) 31,165
 36,401
 49,897
 89,498
Provision for income taxes11,097
 22,612
 30,101
 22,901
 25,698
2,163
 14,268
 1,253
 11,097
 22,612
Net income38,800
 66,886
 79,980
 58,370
 59,304
Income per share: 
  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
 $38,800
 $66,886
(Loss) income per share: 
  
  
  
  
Basic$0.76
 $1.32
 $1.59
 $1.15
 $1.17
$(1.09) $0.33
 $0.68
 $0.76
 $1.32
Diluted$0.74
 $1.30
 $1.56
 $1.12
 $1.13
$(1.09) $0.32
 $0.67
 $0.74
 $1.30
Weighted average number of shares51,349
 50,727
 50,154
 50,902
 50,778
50,910
 51,533
 51,611
 51,349
 50,727
Common stock equivalents910
 863
 1,038
 1,224
 1,568

 556
 766
 910
 863
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares52,259
 51,590
 51,192
 52,126
 52,346
50,910
 52,089
 52,377
 52,259
 51,590

2013 2012 2011 2010 20092016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Financial and Statistical Data: 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Working capital$416,866
 $396,385
 $340,160
 $250,888
 $289,530
$302,535
 $368,985
 $391,944
 $403,153
 $386,784
Current ratio3.3
 4.0
 4.1
 2.9
 4.1
2.6
 3.0
 2.8
 3.2
 4.0
Property, plant and equipment, net$256,953
 $161,657
 $155,528
 $154,313
 $137,807
$337,634
 $321,948
 $271,437
 $256,953
 $161,657
Capital expenditures$62,188
 $53,198
 $46,669
 $56,304
 $56,379
$102,405
 $122,220
 $73,648
 $62,188
 $53,198
Depreciation and amortization$65,481
 $49,966
 $48,145
 $43,236
 $36,462
$89,911
 $86,053
 $81,740
 $65,481
 $49,966
Total assets$1,461,917
 $911,135
 $833,264
 $760,928
 $649,693
$1,319,128
 $1,485,417
 $1,514,178
 $1,461,917
 $911,135
Total debt$480,094
 $3,771
 $4,879
 $20,520
 $6,038
$408,000
 $427,891
 $437,687
 $480,094
 $3,771
Stockholders’ equity$769,182
 $732,631
 $686,136
 $593,124
 $539,884
$721,565
 $826,122
 $837,888
 $769,182
 $732,631
Debt as a % of stockholders’ equity62.4% 0.5% 0.7% 3.5% 1.1%56.5% 51.8% 52.2% 62.4% 0.5%
Employees3,563
 2,337
 2,201
 2,327
 2,016
3,225
 3,383
 3,782
 3,563
 2,337


21


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Business

Haemonetics is a bloodglobal healthcare company dedicated to providing innovative products to customers involved in the processing, handling and analysis of blood. We offer a comprehensive portfolio of integrated devices, information management, solutions company. Anchored by our medical device systems and related consumables, we also provide information technology platforms and value addedconsulting services to provide customers with business solutions which support improvedthe goal of helping improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs for blood and plasma collectors, hospitals, and patients and efficiency inaround the blood supply chain.world.

Our medical device systems provide both automatedBlood and its components (plasma, platelets, and red cells) have many vital and frequently life-saving clinical applications. Plasma is used for patients with major blood loss and is manufactured into pharmaceuticals to treat a variety of illnesses and hereditary disorders such as hemophilia. Red cells treat trauma patients or patients undergoing surgery with high blood loss, such as open heart surgery or organ transplant. Platelets treat cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Blood is essential to a modern healthcare system.

Recent Developments

Global Strategic Review
We recently undertook a global strategic review of our business portfolio to identify which end markets and product franchises have the strongest growth opportunities. As a result of that review, we organized our current products into four franchises for purposes of evaluating their growth potential: Plasma, Hemostasis Management, Donor and Cell Processing. In that review, “Plasma” included plasma collection devices and disposables, plasma donor management software and anticoagulant and saline sold to plasma customers. “Hemostasis Management” included devices and methodologies for measuring coagulation characteristics of blood, such as our TEG® Hemostasis Analyzer. “Donor” included blood collection and processing of blood components, and manual collection and processing of donated blood, assess likelihood for blood loss, salvage and process blood from surgery patients, and dispense and track blood inventory in the hospital. These systems include devices and single-use, proprietary disposable sets (“disposables”) some of which operate only with our specialized devices. Our plasmadisposables for red cells, platelets and whole blood center systems allow users to collect and process only the blood component(s) they target - plasma, platelets, or red blood cells - increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection efficiencies. Our manual blood collection and filtration systems enable the manual collection of all blood components and detect bacteria in whole blood derived platelets, thus reducing the risks of infection through transfusion. Our blood diagnostics system assesses hemostasis (a patient's clotting ability) to aid clinicians in assessing the cause of bleeding, resulting in overall reductions in blood product usage. Ourrelated donor management software. “Cell Processing” included surgical blood salvage systems, allow surgeonsspecialized blood cell processing systems, disposables and blood transfusion management software.

In connection with this strategic review, we concluded that Plasma and Hemostasis Management have the greatest growth potential, while Cell Processing innovation offers an opportunity to collectincrease market share and expand into new segments. Donor is competing in challenging markets which require us to manage the blood lost bybusiness differently, including reducing costs and the scope of the current product line. In recognition of these conclusions, we have begun to implement an operating model that will streamline the management structure and rationalize our cost structure, with an aim to bring about sustainable productivity improvement across the organization. Overall, we expect implementation of our new direction will require multiple changes and will extend beyond fiscal 2017.

Restructuring Initiative

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in connection with our global strategic review, we launched the first phase of a patientrestructuring program designed to reposition our organization and improve our cost structure. The first phase includes both a reduction of headcount and operating costs as well as projects to simplify product lines. We may also take additional steps to modify our manufacturing operations to reflect our strategic direction.

We expect to incur approximately $26 million of restructuring and transformation charges, comprised of $17 million in surgery, cleansetermination benefits and $9 million in other related exit costs. Substantially all of these charges will result in future cash outlays and are expected to be incurred during fiscal 2017. Savings from this program are estimated to be approximately $40 million in fiscal 2017. Subsequent phases of the blood,program may require restructuring charges in future fiscal years.

Impairments

Goodwill. As discussed in Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we evaluate goodwill for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded that indicators of potential goodwill impairment were present for the EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units, therefore requiring an interim test for goodwill impairment. We recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $66.3

million in the EMEA reporting unit during the third quarter of fiscal 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our second step of the goodwill impairment test and make it available for transfusion backconcluded that no adjustment to the patient. Our$66.3 million impairment loss initially recorded was required. The impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 represented the entire goodwill balance allocated to EMEA.


SOLX. In April 2013, we acquired a patented red cell storage solution, referred to as SOLX, from Hemerus Medical, LLC for cash consideration of $24.1 million plus an agreement to make certain future payments accounted for as contingent consideration. We acquired SOLX to complement the portfolio of whole blood collection, filtration and processing product lines and to bring greater efficiency and productivity to whole blood collection and processing. During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we received U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance for the SOLX solution with a Haemonetics whole blood filter. At that time, the vast majority of the U.S. market utilized a red cell filter, not a whole blood filter, for whole blood collection procedures as they seek to optimize blood component yield from each collection. To bring SOLX to market with a red cell filter would have required substantial additional investment. Accordingly, we conducted a final market review prior to proceeding with this investment, which indicated customers would not pay a price for a SOLX collection kit sufficient to recover the cost to produce it, or to provide an adequate return on the additional investment. As result, in fiscal 2016, we suspended further investment in the SOLX technology and recorded an impairment charge of $18.7 million to write down the carrying value of the SOLX intangible assets. In addition, we reversed the $4.9 million of contingent consideration liability we had recorded, as we now do not expect to achieve the conditions that called for its payment.

Other Assets. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our global strategic review which resulted in the identification of certain long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets that were at risk of being impaired due to changes in the strategic direction of the Company. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we performed impairment tests for each of the identified assets and based on revised expectations, we recorded asset impairment charges of $16.2 million. These charges included the write down of $9.1 million of property, plant and equipment and $7.1 million of intangible assets. Refer to Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, and Note 12, Property, Plant and Equipment, to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

Declines in U.S. Blood Center Collections

In fiscal 2016, sales of our whole blood tracking systems automate the distributiondisposables to U.S. blood centers represented less than 6% of bloodour total revenue. The demand for these disposable products in the hospital.U.S. declined in fiscal 2015 and 2014 due to a rapid decline in demand for blood products associated with actions taken by hospitals to improve blood management techniques and protocols. During the fiscal 2016, the decline in U.S. blood center collections was approximately 7%, compared to approximately 10% in fiscal 2015.

We either sellIn response to this trend, certain large U.S. blood center collection groups pursued single source vendors for whole blood collection products which required significant reductions in average selling prices in order to retain or increase our share of their business. During fiscal 2014, we entered into a multi-year agreement to supply the HemeXcel Purchasing Alliance, LLC with certain whole blood collection components during the calendar years 2014-2016. The agreement included a reduction in average selling prices which was implemented at the end of first quarter of fiscal 2015. In March 2014, the American Red Cross selected another exclusive supplier to provide certain whole blood products. This reduced annualized revenues by approximately $25 million beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2015.

Apheresis Red Cell Collection Arrangements

During the first half of fiscal 2016, the American Red Cross and two group purchasing organizations representing other U.S. blood collectors ("Blood Center GPOs") pursued arrangements for apheresis red cell collections. These negotiations have concluded and will negatively affect red cell revenues and gross margins. The expected negative impact on fiscal 2017 operating income as a result of these negotiations is approximately $12 million. Red cell disposable revenues in the U.S. totaled $34.8 million during fiscal 2016 and $37.6 million during fiscal 2015.

On August 1, 2015, we entered into a contract for apheresis devices and single-use disposables with the American Red Cross which has resulted in a decrease in revenue and gross profit in our Blood Center business. In accordance with this agreement, we provided a one-time payment to customers (resultingassist in equipment revenue) or placethe transition of red cell collections to our devices with customers subjecttechnology. This contract is expected to certain conditions. When the device remains our property, the customer has the right to use it for a period of time as long as the customer meets certain conditions we have established, which, among other things, generally include one or moreresult in 100% share of the following:
PurchaseAmerican Red Cross's apheresis red cell collection business and consumptionhigher sales volumes, but at lower prices. The impact of the price concessions began in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, while the transition to a minimum levelhigher share of disposables products;
Payment of monthly rental fees; and
An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of procedures per month per device.the American Red Cross' business is ongoing.

Recent developmentsIn addition, both Blood Center GPOs have recommended competitive technologies to their members. We expect revenue to decline as their individual blood center members convert to the competitive technologies.

Value Creation and Capture Initiatives

On August 1, 2012In fiscal 2016, we completed the acquisitionour Value Creation and Capture (“VCC”) opportunities initiative. This initiative included (i) discontinuation of manufacturing activities at our Ascoli-Piceno, Italy and Braintree, Massachusetts facilities, (ii) expansion of our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico, (iii) transfer of all equipment production to our contract manufacturer, Sanmina Corporation, and (iv) consolidation of the business assetsmanufacturing of product formerly produced in the U.S. and Italy to our new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia. We continue to manufacture in Bothwell, Scotland. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources discussion for further discussion of the blood collection, filtration and processing product linescosts of Pall Corporation. We paid a total of $535.2 million in cash consideration. The acquisition was funded utilizing $475.0 million of loans and the remainder from cash on hand. The blood processing systems and equipment acquired are for use in transfusion medicine and include manufacturing facilities in Covina, California; Tijuana, Mexico; Ascoli, Italy and a portion of Pall's assets in Fajardo, Puerto Rico. Approximately 1,300 employees transferred to Haemonetics. We anticipate paying an additional $15.0 million upon the replication and delivery of certain manufacturing assets of Pall's filter media business to Haemonetics by 2016. Until that time, Pall will manufacture and sell filter media to Haemonetics under a supply agreement.these activities.

On April 30, 2013, we completed the acquisition of the business assets of Hemerus Medical, LLC, a Minnesota-based company that develops innovative technologies for the collection of whole blood and processing and storage of blood components. We have paid $24.0 million for Hemerus as of May 2013 and have committed to payment of an additional $3.0 million contingent upon receipt of an additional FDA approval. Additionally, up to $14.0 million will be paid based on future sales of SOLX-based products achieved within the next 10 years.
Market Trends
Plasma Market

There are two key aspects to the market for our plasma products; the growth in demand for plasma-derived pharmaceuticals and the limited number of significant bio-pharmaceutical companies in this market.

Changes in demand for plasma-derived pharmaceuticals, particularly immunoglobulin (“IG”), are the key driver of plasma collection volumes in the commercial plasmabio-pharmaceutical market. Various factors related to the supply of plasma and the production of plasma-derived pharmaceuticals also affect collection volume, including the following:
Industry consolidation continues among plasma collectors and fractionators. As customers become more vertically integrated, the number of centers served, and collections at those centers, can change.  Consolidation can also impact the choice in plasma collection system used to perform some or all of those collections.
Several blood collectors supply additional plasma to fractionators, and thus collection volumesplasma supply can rise overall but not directly impact our commercial plasma business.

22


The newer plasma fractionation facilitiesBio-pharmaceutical companies are seeking more efficient in their production processes, helping companiesto meet growing demand for pharmaceuticals without requiring an equivalent increase in plasma supply.
Reimbursement guidelines affect the demand for end product pharmaceuticals, although off-label use of pharmaceuticals is growing, in particular for Alzheimer's treatment.
Newly approved indications for, and the growing understanding and thus diagnosis of auto-immune diseases treated with plasma derived therapies increase the demand for plasma, as do longer lifespans and a growing aging patient population.
Geographical expansion of biopharmaceuticals also increases demand for plasma.

Despite the overall growth in the market, the number of bio-pharmaceutical companies who fractionate plasma is limited. And while the global trend toward consolidation among these companies has stabilized, we do not expect meaningful new entries or diversification.

Demand for our plasma products in fiscal 2013 was particularly strong2016 continued to grow in North America where approximately two-thirds of commercial plasma is collected. Global marketsas collection volumes benefited from an expanding end user market for plasmapheresis have been relatively flat,plasma-derived biopharmaceuticals with U.S. produced plasma meeting an increasing percentage of plasma volume demand worldwide.

Blood Center Market

In the blood center market, we sell products used in the collection of platelets, red cells and whole blood. Whole blood is collected from the donor and then transported to a laboratory where it is separated into its components: red cells, platelets and/or plasma.  While we sell products around the world, a significant portion of our sales are to a limited number of customers due to relatively limited number of blood collectors.

Platelets are collected globally, although each local market can be quite different. Despite modest increases in the demand for platelets in Europe and Japan, improved collection efficiencies that increase the yield of platelets per collection and more efficient use of collected platelets have resulted in a flat market for automated collections and related disposables in these countries. In particular, the use of "double dose" collection methods in Europe and Japan has increased. Double dose collections involve collecting two therapeutic platelet doses from one donor. Competition in double dose collection technology is intense and can negatively impact our sales in markets where these collections are prevalent.

Blood management is an approach to optimizing the care of patients that may need a transfusion that includes a wide range of practices and protocols which influence the need for, and use of, blood products in hospitals. Adoption of blood management

practices by hospitals, particularly in the United States, continues to gain momentum. Blood management efforts reduce the demand for red cells, which in turn can reduce the demand for our red cell and whole blood collection products.

Balancing these trends in the United States, Europe and Japan is the development of emerging markets. With changes in healthcare and social security systems in emerging markets, a larger number of people getare gaining access to state of the art medical treatments, which drives the demand for platelet transfusions, in particular, and represent a faster growing market.

As discussed in Recent Developments above, we believe the decline in U.S. blood center collections of approximately 7% in fiscal 2016 will continue in fiscal 2017. Demand for red cells has declined modestly in mature markets due to better blood management and the development of less invasive, lower blood loss medical procedures and blood management.  Highlyprocedures. However, highly populated emerging market countries are increasing their demand for blood components as they are advancing their health care coverage, and as greater numbers of people gain access to more advanced medical treatment, demand for blood components, including red cells increases directly.
Hospital Market
In the hospital market, we sell cardiovascular surgical blood salvage systems,and orthopedic surgical blood salvage systems, and a blood diagnostics instrument.hemostasis management analyzers.
Our Cell Saver brand surgical blood salvage system was designed as a solution for rapid, high volume blood loss procedures, such as cardiovascular surgeries. Since the 2012 introduction of the Cell Saver Elite, weIn recent years, more efficient blood use and less invasive cardiovascular surgeries have seen growth from emergingreduced demand for this device and contributed to intense competition in mature markets, due towhile increased access to healthcare in emerging economies has provided new markets and we have also had growth in mature markets.sources of growth.
Our OrthoPAT technology is used to salvage red cells in high blood loss orthopedic procedures, including hip and knee replacement surgeries. The OrthoPAT isOver the only system onlast three years, improved blood management practices, including the market designeduse of tranexamic acid to collect, separatetreat and wash a patient’s shed blood both during and after surgery. While cell salvage is not yet a standardprevent post-operative bleeding, have significantly reduced the use of care for U.S. orthopedic procedures, we position this device as an effective alternative to stored red cells (both autologous predonated and allogeneic) and non-washed autotransfusion systems. Particularly in the United States, hip and knee replacement surgeries are frequently elective surgeries and as a result are subject to change in economic conditions.OrthoPAT.
Our TEG ThromobelastographThrombelastograph Hemostasis Analyzer is aAnalyzers are diagnostic tooltools which provides a comprehensive assessment of a patient’s overall hemostasis. The benefit is that thisThis information enables caregivers to decide the best blood-related clinical treatment for the individual patient in order to minimize blood loss and reduce incidenceloss. The use of "reoperations". The test is expandingour TEG 5000 analyzer continues to expand beyond cardiac surgery into trauma as well as helping manage surgical timing of patients on anti-platelet medications.and other clinical uses. TEG product line sales further strengthened in fiscal 2013.2016, with strong performance in North America and China. This product’s growth is dependent on hospitals adopting this technology as a standard practice in their blood management programs. We have launched our next generation device, the TEG 6s, in certain markets in Europe and Asia. In North America, our largest market for TEG, TEG 6s is in a limited market release.
Software Market
Our software solutions portfolio addresses many of the critical data collection and data management needs within the plasma, blood center, and hospital marketsmarkets.
In the plasma market, we provide software which assists in collection center management. Our Next Generation Donor Management Software has been favorably received by the market and is also a key component of our blood management solutions today. In fiscal 2013, the pressures to improve efficiencies, reduce cost, and improve patient outcomes continued to be key drivers in all three markets.being implemented at two significant customers.
Demand for our plasma software solution declined in fiscal 2013 as a sub-segment of this market has or intends to migrate towards homegrown proprietary software solutions in an effort to gain unique competitive advantages.

23


In the blood center market for software, we currently participate most actively in the United States, where expansion to new or emerging technology platforms such as our El Dorado Software Solution Suite has been slow due to industry consolidation and the relatively high cost and management focus required to migrateof migrating to new information technology platforms. This trend has limited revenue growth butand will likely continue to minimize potential opportunities in the future. However, in the immediate future high switching costs noted and recurring maintenance revenue streams from existing productscustomers has provided relative revenue stability in this segment.product group.
We currently participate in the hospital markets for software market primarily in the United States and Europe. In the United States, we have experienced growth in our installed base for our blood bankinghospital transfusion solution, SafeTraceTX, due to demand for reliable, proven safety systems within blood banks.transfusion services. However, growth has beenin the United States continues to be constrained recently due to hospital IT organization focus on the electronic medical records mandate.mandates. Revenues from BloodTrack, a blood inventory and transfusion management system, have increased in the United States and Europe recently as hospitals seek means to improve efficiencies and meet compliance guidelines for tracking and dispositioning blood components to patients.

24


Financial Summary
(In thousands, except per share data)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Net revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
 22.6 % 7.6 %$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
 (0.2)% (3.0)%
Gross profit$428,131
 $369,240
 $355,209
 15.9 % 4.0 %$405,914
 $434,418
 $468,365
 (6.6)% (7.2)%
% of net revenues48.0% 50.7% 52.5%  
  
44.7 % 47.7% 49.9%  
  
Operating expenses$371,694
 $280,482
 $244,661
 32.5 % 14.6 %$449,856
 $393,878
 $421,933
 14.2 % (6.6)%
Operating income$56,437
 $88,758
 $110,548
 (36.4)% (19.7)%
Operating (loss) income$(43,942) $40,540
 $46,432
 n/m
 (12.7)%
% of net revenues6.3% 12.2% 16.3%  
  
(4.8)% 4.5% 4.9%  
  
Other income (expense), net$(6,540) $740
 $(467) 

 

Income before taxes$49,897
 $89,498
 $110,081
 (44.2)% (18.7)%
Other expense, net$(9,474) $(9,375) $(10,031) 1.1 % (6.5)%
(Loss) income before taxes$(53,416) $31,165
 $36,401
 n/m
 (14.4)%
Provision for income tax$11,097
 $22,612
 $30,101
 (50.9)% (24.9)%$2,163
 $14,268
 $1,253
 (84.8)% n/m
% of pre-tax income22.2% 25.3% 27.3%  
  
(4.0)% 45.8% 3.4%  
  
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
 (42.0)% (16.4)%
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
 n/m
 (51.9)%
% of net revenues4.3% 9.2% 11.8%  
  
(6.1)% 1.9% 3.7%  
  
Earnings per share-diluted$0.74
 $1.30
 $1.56
 (43.1)% (16.7)%
Net (loss) income per share - diluted$(1.09) $0.32
 $0.67
 n/m
 (52.2)%
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal 2013, 2012year 2016 includes 53 weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and 2011 eachthe fourth quarter having 14 weeks. Fiscal year 2015 and 2014 included 52 weeks with each quarter having 13 weeks.
Net revenuerevenues for fiscal 2013 increased 22.6%2016 were flat compared to fiscal 2012.2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, net revenuerevenues increased 22.2%2.9% compared to fiscal 20122015. This increase includesRevenue increases in plasma and TEG disposables were offset by declines in blood center disposables and reduced surgical, OrthoPAT and equipment sales from the recently acquired whole blood business of $138.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013.April 2, 2016. The remaining53rd week in fiscal 2016 also contributed to the increase, as it accounted for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 is primarily due to1.7% of additional revenue growth from our plasma, surgical and diagnostics products. Fiscal 2012 revenue benefited from purchases by the Japan Red Cross (“JRC”) in March 2012 to avoid future supply disruptions in anticipation of an internal business system conversion, negatively impacting fiscal year ended March 30, 2013.
Net revenue for fiscal 2012 increased 7.6%as compared to fiscal 20112015..
Net revenues for fiscal 2015 decreased 3.0% compared to fiscal 2014. Without the effects of foreign exchange, net revenue increased 5.6%revenues decreased 1.3% over fiscal 2011. The increase reflects strong revenue growth from our2014. Revenue increases in plasma blood center, diagnostics businesses and increased equipment and software sales,TEG disposables were more than offset by declines duein the whole blood disposables for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2015.
We recorded an operating loss in fiscal 2016, as compared to operating income in fiscal 2015. Operating income decreased for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 primarily as a recallresult of certain OrthoPAT devices. As mentioned above,the goodwill and other asset impairment charges recognized in the second half of fiscal 2012 revenue growth also benefited from purchases2016, as discussed above. This increase in operating expenses was partially offset by the Japanese Red Crossreductions in March 2012.restructuring and transformation expenses of $27.5 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015.
During fiscal 20132015, operating income decreased 36.4%12.7% compared to fiscal 20122014. Without the effects of foreign currency, operating income decreased 43.7%0.9% compared to fiscal 20122014 as increased gross profit. Operating income decreased primarily due to revenue growth was more thanlower whole blood disposables volume and pricing and the associated reduced manufacturing efficiency. These decreases were partially offset by higherreduced restructuring and transformation costs, of goods sold dueand organizational cost savings initiatives. Restructuring and transformation costs were $66.8 million for fiscal 2015, as compared to acquisition-related step-up$84.8 million for the comparative prior year period.
We recorded a net loss in the value of acquired inventory. Also contributingfiscal 2016, as compared to net income in fiscal 2015. The change in net loss is primarily attributable to the decrease in operating income wasdescribed above, partially offset by a $7.0 million inventory reserve for a quality matter involving a component of our whole blood disposable inventory which occurreddecrease in the third quarter of income tax provision in fiscal 2013 and higher operating expenses including significant acquisition and integration costs totaling $37.3 million.
During fiscal 2012, operating income decreased 19.7%2016 as compared to fiscal 2011. Without the effects of foreign currency, operating income decreased 20.4% over fiscal 2011 as increases in operating expenses more than offset gross profit associated with revenue growth due to higher costs of quality, relatively higher sales of our lower-margin products, expenses associated with European customer claims arising from a quality matter with HS Core, and transaction costs.2015.
Net income decreased 42.0%51.9% during fiscal 2013.2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, net income decreased 49.9%20.8% for fiscal 2013.2015. The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to an increase in tax expense and the decrease in operating income described above and additional interest expense.
Net income decreased 16.4% during fiscal 2012. Without the effects of foreign exchange, net income decreased 18.1% for fiscal 2012.above. The decreaseincrease in net income wastax expense is attributable to the decline in operating income described above.establishment of a valuation allowance for our U.S. net deferred tax assets following three years of cumulative losses directly related to our substantial restructuring and transformation spending.


25


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues by Geography
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
United States$454,874
 $352,160
 $317,355
 29.2% 11.0%$519,440
 $494,788
 $500,719
 5.0 % (1.2)%
International437,116
 375,684
 359,339
 16.4% 4.5%389,392
 415,585
 437,790
 (6.3)% (5.1)%
Net revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
 22.6% 7.6%$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
 (0.2)% (3.0)%
International Operations and the Impact of Foreign Exchange
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are marketed in more than 97approximately 100 countries around the world through a combination of our direct sales force and independent distributors and agents.
OurThe percentage of revenue generated outside the U.S. approximated 49.0%, 51.6%, and 53.1% of net revenue during fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. During fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, revenue in Japan accounted for approximately 13.5%, 17.1%, and 16.3%, respectively, of our total revenue. Revenue from Europe accounted for approximately principle operating regions is summarized below:25.2%, 25.2%, and 27.6% of our total revenue for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
United States57.1% 54.4% 53.4%
Japan9.0% 9.7% 11.6%
Europe20.7% 23.7% 24.0%
Asia12.3% 11.2% 10.1%
Other0.9% 1.0% 0.9%
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
International sales are generally conducted in local currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Chinese Yuan and the Euro.Australian Dollar. Our results of operations are impacted by changes in foreign exchange rates, particularly in the value of the Yen, and the Euro and Australian Dollar relative to the U.S. Dollar.
We have placed foreign currency hedges based on estimates of future revenues to reduce the impacts of currency fluctuations. For fiscal 20132016 as compared to fiscal 2012,2015, the effects of foreign exchange resulted in a 0.4% increase3.1% decrease in sales. The primary reason is the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar to the Japanese Yen and Euro. We expect this relative strength of the U.S. Dollar to continue to negatively impact operating income in fiscal 2017. For fiscal 20122015 as compared to fiscal 20112014, the effects of foreign exchange accounted for a 2.0% increase1.7% decrease in sales.
Please see section entitled “Foreign Exchange” in this discussion for a more complete explanation of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
Net Revenues by Product Type
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Disposables$757,765
 $594,933
 $551,836
 27.4 % 7.8%$784,454
 $783,426
 $806,834
 0.1 % (2.9)%
Software solutions69,952
 70,557
 66,876
 (0.9)% 5.5%72,434
 72,185
 70,441
 0.3 % 2.5 %
Equipment & other64,273
 62,354
 57,982
 3.1 % 7.5%51,944
 54,762
 61,234
 (5.1)% (10.6)%
Net revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
 22.6 % 7.6%$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
 (0.2)% (3.0)%

Disposables Revenues by Product Type
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Plasma disposables$268,900
 $258,061
 $227,209
 4.2 % 13.6 %$348,785
 $319,190
 $291,895
 9.3 % 9.4 %
Blood center disposables 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Platelet169,602
 167,946
 156,251
 1.0 % 7.5 %143,274
 152,588
 156,643
 (6.1)% (2.6)%
Red cell49,733
 48,034
 46,828
 3.5 % 2.6 %39,256
 42,700
 42,378
 (8.1)% 0.8 %
Whole blood138,436
 
 
 100.0 %  %128,532
 143,905
 190,698
 (10.7)% (24.5)%
357,771
 215,980
 203,079
 65.7 % 6.4 %311,062
 339,193
 389,719
 (8.3)% (13.0)%
Hospital disposables 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Diagnostics50,882
 42,187
 33,302
 20.6 % 26.7 %
Surgical73,508
 66,619
 66,503
 10.3 % 0.2 %59,902
 62,540
 66,876
 (4.2)% (6.5)%
OrthoPAT30,230
 31,186
 35,631
 (3.1)% (12.5)%13,823
 20,316
 25,042
 (32.0)% (18.9)%
Diagnostics27,356
 23,087
 19,414
 18.5 % 18.9 %
131,094
 120,892
 121,548
 8.4 % (0.5)%124,607
 125,043
 125,220
 (0.3)% (0.1)%
Total disposables revenue$757,765
 $594,933
 $551,836
 27.4 % 7.8 %
Total disposables revenues$784,454
 $783,426
 $806,834
 0.1 % (2.9)%


26

Table of Contents

Disposables RevenueRevenues
Disposables include the Plasma, Blood Center, and Hospital product lines. Disposables revenue increased 27.4%was flat during fiscal 20132016 and 7.8%decreased 2.9% during fiscal 2012.2015. Without the effecteffects of foreign exchange, disposables revenue increased 26.8%3.3% and 5.7%decreased 1.1% for fiscal 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. In fiscal 2016, revenue increases in plasma and TEG disposables were offset by declines in sales of our blood center, surgical, and OrthoPAT disposables. In fiscal 2015, the decrease was primarily driven by significantly reduced whole blood disposables revenue and was partially offset by growth in plasma and TEG disposables revenue.
Plasma
Plasma disposables revenue increased 4.2%9.3% during fiscal 2013.2016. Without the effects of foreign exchange, plasma disposables revenue increased 4.5%12.0% during fiscal 20132016 compared to fiscal 2012.2015. Plasma revenue primarily increased principally due to higher revenue from commercial fractionation customersvolumes in the United States,U.S. associated with increased collections more than offsetting priceend market growth for plasma-derived biopharmaceuticals. The implementation of a liquid solutions contract with a large U.S. collector and strong performance in Japan and other parts of Asia also contributed to growth. This growth was partially offset by reductions related to market conditions in contract renewals completed in fiscal 2012.Russia.
Plasma disposables revenue increased 13.6%9.4% during fiscal 2012.2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, plasma disposables revenue increased 12.7%10.4% during fiscal 2012 primarily2015. Plasma revenue increased due to increased plasmahigher volumes in the United States associated with end market growth for plasma-derived biopharmaceuticals and benefits from the transition to a direct sales model in Australia and New Zealand which occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2014.
Blood Center
Platelet
While we market our platelets products globally, the dynamics of each market are significantly different. Despite modest increases in the demand for platelets in Europe and Japan, improved collection efficiencies that increase the yield of platelets per collection and more efficient use of collected platelets have resulted in a flat market for automated collections and related disposables in these countries. In particular, the use of "double dose" collection methods in Europe and Japan has increased. Double dose collections involve collecting two therapeutic platelet doses from one donor. Competition in double dose collection technology is intense and has negatively impacted our sales in a number of markets where these collections are prevalent. Most recently in Japan, our market share gains in single dose collections have been offset by the recent adoption of double dose collections by our commercial fractionation customersprimary customer. Increased use of double dose collections in Japan may negatively impact our revenue and gross profit from platelet collection disposables in that market.

In addition to the United States.impact of different collection techniques, emerging markets have seen changes in healthcare and social security systems which have allowed increased access to advanced medical treatment. This has driven the demand for platelet transfusions and increased collection volumes. In emerging markets, particular Russia, we have also seen economic instability negatively impact healthcare spend and our revenue.
Blood Center
Blood Center consists of disposables used to collect platelets, red cells, whole blood and plasma for transfusion.
Platelet
Platelet disposables revenue increased 1.0%decreased 6.1% during fiscal 2013.2016. Without the effecteffects of foreign exchange, platelet disposable revenue decreased 0.8% during fiscal 2016. The decrease in platelet disposable revenue during fiscal 2016, excluding the impact of foreign exchange, was primarily the result of declines in sales in Russia and Latin America. These declines were partially offset by growth in China, India, the Middle East, and other parts of Asia.
Platelet disposables revenue decreased 2.6% during fiscal 2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, platelet disposable revenue increased 1.0%3.0% during fiscal 2013 resulting from continued growth in emerging markets which more than offset declines in mature markets, notably Japan. Revenue growth in Japan was lower due to increased sales resulting from quality issues experienced with a competitor's device in the prior year, and the negative impact of the JRC's purchases in March 2012 to avoid future supply disruptions in anticipation of an internal system conversion.
Platelet disposables revenue increased 7.5% during fiscal 2012.2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, platelet disposable revenue increased 2.5% during fiscal 2012. Thethe increase included the benefit of quality issues experienced with a competitor's device in Japan, increased saleswas due to growth in emerging markets and purchasesthe benefit of order timing in North America offset by the Japaneseimpact of the collection trends in Japan noted above.
Red Cells and Whole Blood
Red cell disposables revenue decreased 8.1% during fiscal 2016. Without the effects of foreign exchange, red cell disposables revenue decreased 7.0% during fiscal 2016. The decrease during fiscal 2016 was driven by price reductions in our principal U.S. red cell market. During fiscal 2016, U.S. blood collection groups pursued arrangements for apheresis red cell collections with the objective of standardizing their collection technology and securing price reductions. These arrangements are now largely in place and began to negatively affect red cell revenues and gross margins during the second quarter of fiscal 2016.
As discussed above, during the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into a contract with the American Red Cross which included an incentive to transition to our technology and price reductions tied to higher volumes. In addition, Blood Center GPOs have selected competitive technologies. We expect revenue to decline from both the lower pricing in March 2012the American Red Cross contract and the conversion by Blood Center GPOs to avoid future supply disruptionsthe competitive technologies. Red cell disposable revenues in anticipation of an internal business system conversion.the U.S. totaled $34.8 million and $37.6 million during fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Red Cell
Red cell disposables revenue increased 3.5%0.8% during fiscal 2013.2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, red cell disposables revenue increased 3.8%0.8% during fiscal 2013,2015. The increase was driven by North American sales due primarily to favorable order timing in North America in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. We do not expect material growthchanges in red cell revenue as market trends indicate improvedcollection practices and was partially offset by declines in Europe and Latin America. During fiscal 2015, we saw a modest shift in order patterns from whole blood management procedures in hospitals are reducing demand for red cells in mature markets.
Red cell disposables revenue increased 2.6% during fiscal 2012. Without the effects of foreign exchange,to red cell disposables due to customer efforts to more efficiently collect red cells.
Whole blood revenue increased 2.6%decreased 10.7% during fiscal 2012, driven primarily by increased account penetration at existing customers for red cells in North America.
Whole Blood
Whole blood disposables revenue was $138.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, representing sales of products from the whole blood acquisition completed on August 1, 2012. In March 2013, we failed to receive renewal of a European tender that will negatively impact fiscal 2014 revenue. Annual sales under this contract were $12.2 million. Gross margin on whole blood sales to this customer is substantially lower than our average gross margin on the whole blood or other disposable sales.
Hospital
Hospital consists of Surgical, OrthoPAT, and Diagnostics products. The hospital product line includes the following brand platforms: the Cell Saver brand, the TEG brand, the OrthoPAT brand and the cardioPAT brand.
Surgical
Surgical disposables revenue consists principally of the Cell Saver and cardioPAT products. Revenue from our surgical disposables increased 10.3% during fiscal 2013.2016. Without the effect of foreign exchange, surgicalwhole blood revenue decreased 8.3% during fiscal 2016. Whole blood disposables revenue increased 8.4% duringfor fiscal 2013, with revenue growth realized across all markets we serve. We achieved growth from market

27

Table of Contents

acceptance of Cell Saver Elite in the U.S., Europe and Japan, while emerging market growth was realized through increased commercial presence in emerging markets such as China. Surgical revenue also benefited from market share gains due to limited product availability from our primary competitor2016 decreased primarily due to a now resolved supply chain disruption following a natural disaster in Europe.declining U.S. whole blood market. The anniversary of the loss of the American Red Cross whole blood business occurred at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2016, however, we continue to be negatively impacted by the declining market.
Revenue from our surgical disposables increased 0.2%Whole blood revenue decreased 24.5% during fiscal 2012.2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, surgical disposableswhole blood revenue decreased 2.2% for 24.1% during fiscal 2012,2015, due to competitive pressuresthe loss of the American Red Cross business, lower pricing to HemeXcel, the loss of a European tender early in fiscal 2014 and a decreasemacro-economic conditions in demand across our European andRussia. Declines in North American markets associated with lower surgical volumes. Duringtransfusion rates of 10% contributed approximately $8.0 million to the fiscal 2012, we introduced the Cell Saver Elite, our next generation surgical device, first in North America and then across all geographies.2015 decline.
OrthoPAT
Revenue from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 3.1% during fiscal 2013. Without the effect of foreign exchange, OrthoPAT disposables revenue decreased by 3.8% primarily due to lower sales in the United States as device utilization by smaller hospitals has declined following the voluntary recall of the OrthoPAT device in fiscal 2012.
Revenue from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 12.5% during fiscal 2012. Without the effect of foreign exchange, OrthoPAT disposables revenue decreased by 13.4%, also as a result of the voluntary recall of our OrthoPAT devices during the first quarter of fiscal 2012.Hospital
Diagnostics
Diagnostics product revenue consists principally of the consumable reagents used with the TEG hemostasis management family of products. RevenuesRevenue from TEG consumersdiagnostic products increased 18.5%20.6% during fiscal 2013.2016. Without the effect of foreign exchange, diagnostic product revenue increased by 17.0%20.2%. The revenue increase is due to continued adoption of our hemostasis system, principally in the U.S. and China. We are continuing our limited market release of the TEG 6s device and disposables.
Revenue from our diagnostic products increased 26.7% during fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, diagnostic product revenue increased 23.4%. The revenue increase is due to continued adoption of our TEG analyzer, principally in the United States and China.
Surgical
Surgical disposables revenue consists principally of the Cell Saver and CardioPAT products. Revenue from our diagnostics products increased 18.9%surgical disposables decreased 4.2% during fiscal 2012.2016. Without the effect of foreign exchange, diagnostic productsurgical disposables revenue increased 1.0% during fiscal 2016. The increase in surgical disposable revenue was primarily attributable to modest growth in Japan and in the emerging markets in Russia and China.
Revenue from our surgical disposables decreased 6.5% during fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, surgical disposables revenue decreased 3.3% during fiscal 2015. The decline in surgical revenue in developed markets was partially offset by 19.2%growth in emerging markets.

OrthoPAT
Revenue from our OrthoPAT disposables decreased 32.0% during fiscal 2016. Without the effect of foreign exchange, OrthoPAT disposables revenue decreased 27.5%. The revenue increase is dueBetter blood management has reduced orthopedic blood loss and continues to continuedimpact demand for OrthoPAT disposables. Recent trends in blood management, particularly the adoption of tranexamic acid to treat and prevent orthopedic post-operative blood loss, continue to lessen hospital use of OrthoPAT disposables. During fiscal 2016, OrthoPAT disposable revenues were also negatively impacted by a supply chain interruption. We expect continued declines in OrthoPAT revenues in fiscal 2017.
Revenue from our TEG analyzer, including expansion with North American hospitalsOrthoPAT disposables decreased 18.9% during fiscal 2015. Without the effect of foreign exchange, OrthoPAT disposables revenue decreased 16.5% as better blood management has reduced orthopedic blood loss and sales growthdemand for OrthoPAT disposables. Recent trends in China.blood management, particularly the adoption of tranexamic acid to treat and prevent orthopedic post-operative blood loss, have continued to reduce hospital use of OrthoPAT disposables.
Other Revenues
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Software solutions$69,952
 $70,557
 $66,876
 (0.9)% 5.5%$72,434
 $72,185
 $70,441
 0.3 % 2.5 %
Equipment and other64,273
 62,354
 57,982
 3.1 % 7.5%51,944
 54,762
 61,234
 (5.1)% (10.6)%
Net other revenues$134,225
 $132,911
 $124,858
 1.0 % 6.4%$124,378
 $126,947
 $131,675
 (2.0)% (3.6)%
Software Solutions
Our software solutions revenue includes sales of our information technology software platforms and consulting services.
Software solutions revenue decreased 0.9%was flat during fiscal 20132016. Without the effects of foreign exchange, software solutions revenue increased 0.2%2.7% during fiscal 20132016. Installed baseThe growth in hospital-based solutions SafeTraceTXsoftware revenues in fiscal 2016 was driven by the finalization of services under a contract with the Department of Defense, the recognition of previously deferred revenue associated with one of our largest customers, BloodTrack growth in Europe, and BloodTrackincreased software support service revenue. This growth was partially offset by declines in plasma software revenue.BloodTrack in the U.S. and lower new system installs in Europe.
Software solutions revenue increased 5.5%2.5% during fiscal 20122015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, software solutions revenue increased 4.7%2.9% during fiscal 20122015. The increase is primarilyDuring fiscal 2015, software revenue increased due to installed base growthstrong BloodTrack sales in our SafeTraceTXthe U.S. and BloodTrack products.Europe.
Equipment & Other
Our equipment and other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service and training programs. These revenues are primarily composed of equipment sales, which tend to vary from period to period more than our disposable businessproduct line due to the timing of order patterns, particularly in our distribution markets.
Equipment and other revenue increased 3.1%decreased 5.1% during fiscal 20132016. Without the effects of currency exchange, equipment and other revenue decreased 1.9%. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to a rebate assessed by the Italian government and declines in Russia and Japan. The decline in Russia was due to the Russian market suspending all equipment purchasing in fiscal 2016 and the decline in Japan was a result of lower platelet equipment sales. These declines were partially offset by increases in red cell equipment revenue in the U.S. and plasma equipment revenue in Germany.
Equipment and other revenue decreased 10.6% during fiscal 2015. Without the effect of currency exchange, equipment and other revenue increased 3.2%decreased 8.7%. The increasedecrease in revenue during fiscal 2015 is due primarily to higher TEG equipment salesthe impact of order timing and macro-economic conditions in China and higher surgical equipment sales across multiple markets.

28

Table of Contents

Equipment and other revenue increased 7.5% during fiscal 2012. Without the effect of currency exchange, equipment and other revenue increased 5.2% driven by higher equipment sales in Europe, Asia and Japan, and the launch of the Cell Saver Elite device.Russia.
Gross Profit
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Gross profit$428,131
 $369,240
 $355,209
 15.9% 4.0%$405,914
 $434,418
 $468,365
 (6.6)% (7.2)%
% of net revenues48.0% 50.7% 52.5%  
  
44.7% 47.7% 49.9%  
  

Our gross profit increased 15.9%decreased 6.6% during fiscal 20132016. Without the effects of foreign exchange, gross profit increased 13.8%decreased 2.0% during fiscal 20132016. Our gross profit margin percentage decreased by 270300 basis points for fiscal 20132016 as compared to fiscal 20122015. The decrease in the gross profit margin during fiscal 2016 was primarily due to the effect of foreign exchange, inventory related charges of $9.4 million and impairment of assets of $8.8 million. Product mix, including plasma disposables, price reductions in our blood center business, and the amortization of software development costs in the early stages of product launches also negatively impacted gross profit. These declines were partially offset by cost savings from productivity programs, including the VCC initiatives. Gross profit margin continues to be impacted by the inefficiency of underutilized production capacity.
Our gross profit amount decreased 7.2% during fiscal 2015. Without the effects of foreign exchange, gross profit decreased 5.1% during fiscal 2015. Our gross profit margin percentage decreased by 220 basis points for fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014. The decrease in gross profit margin for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 includes $11.9 million of costs of goods sold28, 2015 was primarily due to price reductions in the blood collection markets, reduced manufacturing efficiency related to the increase in fair value of acquisition-relatedlower whole blood inventory acquiredvolumes and relatively higher sales from Pall as well as an approximately $7.0 million inventory reserve recorded related to a quality matter. This reserve related to the removal of affected whole blood collection sets from inventory for destruction or rework based on a quality matter detected during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. We issued a field action letter to blood center customers requesting visual inspection of a component of certain whole blood collection sets, due to the potential for a leak to occur at a very low frequency.  The component, referred to as a Y connector, was supplied by a contract manufacturer. We will pursue all available means of financial recovery related to this inventory loss. However, no salvage or recovery value from these efforts was recorded as we cannot currently conclude whether a favorable outcome will result.

Additionally, the decrease inproducts with lower gross profit margin included the combined impact of whole blood disposable sales, as whole blood gross margins are lower than average gross margins for our complete product line. This wasmargins. These decreases were partially offset by reduced equipment depreciation expense as a result of a change in estimated useful livescost savings from our VCC initiatives implemented during the year endedfiscal March 30, 2013. The effect of this change in estimate was a reduction of depreciation expense in fiscal 2013 by $4.5 million, an increase in income net of tax of $3.3 million2014 and an increase in basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.092015.
Our gross profit amount increased 4.0%Operating Expenses
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Research and development$44,965
 $54,187
 $54,200
 (17.0)%  %
% of net revenues4.9 % 6.0 % 5.8%  
  
Selling, general and administrative$317,223
 $337,168
 $365,977
 (5.9)% (7.9)%
% of net revenues34.9 % 37.0 % 39.0%  
  
Impairment of assets$92,395
 $5,441
 $1,711
 n/m
 218.0 %
% of net revenues10.2 % 0.6 % 0.2%    
Contingent consideration (income) expense
$(4,727) $(2,918) $45
 62.0 % n/m
% of net revenues(0.5)% (0.3)% %    
Total operating expenses$449,856
 $393,878
 $421,933
 14.2 % (6.6)%
% of net revenues49.5 % 43.3 % 45.0%  
  
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased 17.0% during fiscal 2012.2016. Without the effects of foreign exchange, gross profitresearch and development expenses decreased 15.7% during fiscal 2016. The decrease in fiscal 2016 was primarily the result of a reduction in restructuring and transformation costs of $10.9 million, partially offset by increased 1.5%. Our gross profit margin percentage decreased by 180 basis pointsactivities for several projects designed to support our long-term product plans and to increase our competitiveness.
Research and development expenses remained flat during fiscal 20122015. Without the effect of the increased restructuring and transformation costs of $2.8 million in fiscal 2015, as compared to fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to increased product quality costs, the mix of sales among our various product lines, and higher freight costs. The increased product quality costs included the sale of a higher cost substitute product for certain European plasma customers affected by the HS Core quality matter. The relatively lower sales of our higher gross margin hospital products and higher sales of our lower gross margin plasma disposables also reduced our overall gross profit.
Operating Expenses
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
Research and development$44,394
 $36,801
 $32,656
 20.6 % 12.7 %
% of net revenues5.0% 5.1 % 4.8 %  
  
Selling, general and administrative$323,053
 $245,261
 $213,899
 31.7 % 14.7 %
% of net revenues36.2% 33.7 % 31.6 %  
  
Contingent consideration income$
 $(1,580) $(1,894) (100.0)% (16.6)%
% of net revenues% (0.2)% (0.3)%  
  
Asset write-downs$4,247
 $
 $
  %  %
% of net revenues0.5%  %  %  
  
Total operating expenses$371,694
 $280,482
 $244,661
 32.5 % 14.6 %
% of net revenues41.7% 38.5 % 36.2 %  
  
Research and Development
Researchprior year, research and development increased 20.6% during fiscal 2013. This increase is primarily due to additional staff anddecreased by approximately 6.0% as a result of reduced program spending related to the whole blood acquisition and related product initiatives, as well as a general increase in development programs to support long-term product plans and increase our competitiveness.

29

Table of Contents

Research and development increased 12.7% during fiscal 2012, with an immaterial effect of foreign exchange. The increase was primarily related to the general increase in development programs in support of long-term product plans and near-term quality improvements.acquisition.
Selling, General and Administrative
During fiscal 20132016, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 31.7%decreased 5.9%. Without the effects of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 30.6%decreased 2.3% during fiscal 2013. This increase includes acquisition and integration expenses associated with the whole blood acquisition of $37.3 million compared to approximately $3.0 million of whole blood transaction costs incurred2016. The decrease in fiscal 2012. We also incurred approximately $35.22016 was primarily the result of reductions in restructuring and transformation costs of $12.8 million of expenses from the whole blood business following the August 1, 2012 acquisition. and decreased variable compensation. The remainderdecrease was partially offset by increased spending in sales and marketing activities related to plasma and increased spending as a result of the growth is related to investmentsextra week in the global sales organization, particularly emerging markets, and information technology infrastructure to support increased revenue levels. We also incurred higher incentive compensation this fiscal year as financial performance versus established financial targets improved as compared to fiscal 2012.2016.
During fiscal 2012,2015, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 14.7%decreased 7.9%. Without the effects of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11.8%decreased 6.4% during fiscal 2012.2015. The increase was attributabledecrease during fiscal 2015 is primarily related to $3.1a $20.1 million of expenses, net of insurance recovery, associated with European customer claims arising from a quality matter with HS Core, $3.0 million of transactiondecrease in restructuring and transformation costs related to the definitive purchase agreements with Pall Corporation and Hemerus Medical, LLC, $2.2 million of higher restructuring charges,VCC initiatives. This decrease was partially offset by our increased commercial investment in our worldwide salesplasma and marketing organizations,emerging markets and higher bonus expense.
Contingent Consideration Income
Under the accounting rules for business combinations, we established a liability for payments that we might make in the future to former shareholders of Neoteric that are tied to the performance of the BloodTrack business for the first three years post acquisition, beginning with fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2012 and 2011, this business did not achieve the necessary revenue growth milestones for the former shareholders to receive additional performance payments. As such, we reduced the contingent liability by $1.6 million and $1.9 million during fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively, and recorded the adjustments as contingent consideration income in the consolidated statements of income.increased variable compensation.

In September 2011, we entered into an agreement which released the Company from the contingent consideration due to the former shareholdersImpairment of Neoteric. Under the terms of the agreement, the former shareholders of Neoteric received $0.7 million in exchange for releasing the Company from any future claims for contingent consideration. The Company paid the $0.7 million settlement amount during September 2011 and recorded the associated expense in the selling, general and administrative line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Asset Write-DownAssets
We recorded an asset write-downimpairments of $92.4 million in fiscal 2016 primarily consisting of $66.3 million of goodwill impairment, $19.2 million of intangible asset impairments and $6.9 million of property, plant and equipment impairments, as discussed in the $4.2Recent Developments section above.
We recorded asset impairments of $5.4 million in fiscal 2015 associated with exit activities related to our VCC initiatives and certain research and development programs.
We recorded asset impairments of $1.7 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 20132014 associated with exitingexit activities related to technologies originally acquired from Arryx, Inc.our VCC and integration initiatives.
Other income (expense), netExpense, Net
Other expense, net, increased 1.1% during fiscal 20132016 as compared to the same periods of fiscal 20122015 primarily dueand decreased 6.5% during fiscal 2015 as compared to $6.4 million of incremental interestfiscal 2014. Interest expense from our term loan borrowings constitutes the majority of expense reported in all periods. The effective interest rate on total debt outstanding for the $475.0 millionfiscal year ended April 2, 2016 term loan borrowed in connection with the whole blood acquisition.
We reported in other income in fiscal 2012 the reversal of interest on contingent consideration.was approximately 1.9%.
Taxes
 March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 % Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 % Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
Reported income tax rate22.2% 25.3% 27.3% (3.1)% (2.0)%
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 % Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 % Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Reported income tax rate(4.0)% 45.8% 3.4% (49.8)% 42.4%

Reported Tax Rate

The changeWe conduct business globally and as a result report our results of operations in a number of foreign jurisdictions and the United States. Historically, our reported tax rate for fiscal year 2013, as compared to 2012 and 2011 relateswas lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate due primarily to the geographic distributionour jurisdictional mix of income as wellearnings as the impactincome earned in our foreign subsidiaries is generally taxed at a lower tax rate. In fiscal 2015 we established a valuation allowance against a portion of our U.S. deferred tax assets that are not more-likely-than-not realizable due to cumulative losses in the resolutionU.S. In fiscal 2016 we continue to maintain a partial valuation allowance against our net U.S. deferred tax assets and net deferred tax assets of uncertaincertain foreign subsidiaries.

For the year ended April 2, 2016, we recorded an income tax positionsprovision of $2.2 million for our worldwide pre-tax loss of $53.4 million, resulting fromin a reported tax rate of (4.0)%. Our current tax rate is lower than our tax rates of 45.8% and 3.4% for the expirationyears ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, respectively. Our decrease in tax rate is primarily as a result of domestic losses of $18.1 million and foreign losses of $10.8 million for which no tax benefit can be realized. In addition, we recorded income tax expense related to the statuteamortization of limitations for assessingU.S. tax-deductible goodwill, which generates a deferred tax liability that cannot be offset by net operating losses or other deferred tax assets as its reversal is considered indefinite in certain jurisdictions. nature.

30


Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and cash flow position:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Cash & cash equivalents$179,120
 $228,861
$115,123
 $160,662
Working capital$416,866
 $396,385
$302,535
 $368,985
Current ratio3.3
 4.0
2.6
 3.0
Net cash (debt) position(1)$(300,974) $225,090
Net debt position(1)
$(292,877) $(267,229)
Days sales outstanding (DSO)62
 66
58
 58
Disposables finished goods inventory turnover4.0
 5.7
4.6
 4.3

(1)Net cash (debt) position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt.

On (1)August 1, 2012Net debt position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt.,

Our VCC initiatives required cash expenditures for plant closure costs and employee separation benefits, new plant construction and temporary increases in inventory levels as manufacturing is transitioned to new facilities. We paid $51.3 million, $114.3 million and $72.9 million in cash related to restructuring costs, transformation costs and capital expenditures associated with the VCC initiatives during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In fiscal 2017, we expect to incur approximately $26 million of restructuring and transformation charges in connection with the acquisitionfirst phase of our restructuring program that was launched during the whole blood business,first quarter of fiscal 2017, which is designed to reposition our organization and improve our cost structure.

As of April 2, 2016, we entered intohad $115.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. We currently have a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with certain lenders (together, “Lenders”)facility which providedprovides for a $475.0$475.0 million term loan and a $50.0$100.0 million revolving loan. The credit facility matures on July 1, 2019. At April 2, 2016, $358.1 million was outstanding under the term loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), and together with the Term Loan, (the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities have a term of five years and mature on August 1, 2017. As of March 30, 2013 all $50.0 million ofwas outstanding on the Revolving Credit Facility was available.revolving loan. We also have $45.1 million of uncommitted operating lines of credit to fund our global operations.operations and there are no outstanding borrowings as of April 2, 2016.

The credit facility contains covenants that limit the use of cash and require us to maintain certain financial ratios. Any failure to comply with the financial and or other operating covenants of the credit facility would prevent us from borrowing under the revolving credit facility and would constitute a default, which could result in, among other things, the amounts outstanding including all accrued interest and unpaid fees, becoming immediately due and payable. As of April 2, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants.

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flow from operations and option exercises. WeAlthough cash flow from operations will be negatively impacted by the trends noted above, we believe these sources are sufficient to fund our cash requirements over at least the next twelve months, which are primarily total payments of approximately $88.0 million associated with Value Creation and Capture opportunities and acquisition integration activities described below,restructuring initiatives, share repurchases, capital expenditures, cash payments under the loan agreement, and investments including the purchase of Hemerus described previously and other acquisitions.

Value Creation and Capture

On These are described in more detail inApril 29, 2013 Contractual Obligations , we committed to a plan to pursue identified Value Creation and Capture ("VCC") opportunities. These opportunities include investment in product line extensions and next generation products, enhancement of commercial capabilities and a transformation of our manufacturing network. The transformation of our manufacturing network will take place over the next three fiscal years and includes changes to the current manufacturing footprint and supply chain structure (the "Network Plan").below.

To implement the Network Plan, we will (i) discontinue manufacturing activities at our Braintree, Massachusetts location, (ii) create a technology center of excellence for product development, (iii) expand our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico and (iv) build a new manufacturing facility in Asia closer to our customer base in that region.Cash Flow Overview:

We estimate we will incur approximately $23.0 million of cash restructuring expenses during fiscal 2014 which will be recorded through cost of goods sold. To complete the Network Plan we estimate that we will spend an additional $8.0 million for cash restructuring expenses in future years. These costs consist principally of employee related costs, product line transfer costs including relocation and validation, as well as redundant overhead and inefficiencies during the transfer period. The management and execution of this effort will require a dedicated team of program managers, engineers, regulatory and quality professionals, the cost of which is included in these estimates. We also expect to incur non-cash costs of approximately $5.0 million consisting of accelerated depreciation and asset write-downs.

Activities under the Plan will be initiated in fiscal 2014 and are expected to be substantially completed in the next three years.   Additionally, we expect to deploy approximately $36.0 million of cash in fiscal 2014 for capital expenditures to expand our existing Tijuana, Mexico facility and construct a new facility in Asia.

We also expect to incur cash costs totaling $29.0 million associated with our other VCC opportunities, completion of the integration of the whole blood business and the recent acquisition of Hemerus.


31


(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
 Increase/(Decrease)
13 vs. 12
 Increase/(Decrease)
12 vs. 11
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
 Increase/(Decrease)
16 vs. 15
 Increase/(Decrease)
15 vs. 14
Net cash provided by (used in): 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Operating activities$85,074
 $115,318
 $123,455
 $(30,244) $(8,137)$121,865
 $127,178
 $139,524
 $(5,313) $(12,346)
Investing activities(596,395) (52,196) (51,558) (544,199) (638)(104,768) (121,768) (105,830) (17,000) 15,938
Financing activities461,853
 (30,470) (18,084) 492,323
 (12,386)(62,624) (33,160) (20,699) 29,464
 12,461
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(1)(273) (498) 1,332
 225
 (1,830)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(49,741) $32,154
 $55,145
 $(81,895) $(22,991)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(1)
(12) (4,057) 354
 4,045
 (4,411)
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents$(45,539) $(31,807) $13,349
    

(1)The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts into U.S. dollars. In accordance with GAAP, we have removed
(1)The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts into U.S. dollars. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have eliminated the effect of foreign currency throughout our cash flow statement, except for its effect on our cash and cash equivalents.
Cash Flow Overview:
In fiscal 2013, the Company repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million. This completed a $50.0 million share repurchase program that was announced in April 2012.
In fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million. This completed a $50.0 million share repurchase program that was announced in May 2011.
In fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $50.0 million. This completed a $50.0 million share repurchase program that was announced in April 2010.

Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $121.9 million during fiscal 2016, a decrease of $5.3 million as compared to fiscal 2015. Cash provided by operating activities decreased primarily due to a working capital outflow. The working capital outflow was primarily attributable to a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses, driven largely by a reduction in restructuring reserves, accrued bonuses, accruals related to the construction of facilities and licensing agreements, and a decrease in accrued payroll due to the 53rd week. Also contributing to the reduction in cash provided by operating activities was an increase in accounts receivable from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was partially offset by lower inventory driven by our global strategic review, which included a global inventory reduction initiative during fiscal 2016.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $127.2 million during $85.1 million during fiscal 20132015, a decrease of $30.2$12.3 million as compared to fiscal 2012 primarily due to higher payments of acquisition and integration related costs and working capital investments related to sales from the whole blood business, as accounts receivable were not included in the acquired assets.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $115.3 million during fiscal 2012, a decrease of $8.1 million as compared to fiscal 20112014. Cash provided by operating was negatively impacted by higher accounts receivable, higher inventory levels primarily due to support plasma growth, the launch of our next generation surgical device, the Cell Saver Elite, the replacement of OrthoPAT devices and lower net income, offset by lower bonus payments and lower tax payments.earnings.

Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $104.8 million during fiscal 2016, a decrease of $17.0 million as compared to fiscal 2015. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was the result of a reduction in capital expenditures in fiscal 2016 related to manufacturing operations under construction in Malaysia and Tijuana, which have been substantially completed. During fiscal 2015, cash used in investing activities included significant costs related to plant construction activities in Malaysia and Tijuana and the purchase of two previously leased facilities, our manufacturing facility in Salt Lake City and an administrative office at our corporate headquarters in Braintree, Massachusetts.

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $544.2was $121.8 million during fiscal 20132015, an increase of $15.9 million as compared to fiscal 20122014 primarily due to the use$122.2 million of $535.2capital expenditures including $44.9 million related to acquire the whole blood business, of which $475.0 million was funded by term loan borrowings discussed above.our manufacturing network transformation activities. The increase in net cash used in investing activities also included higher capital expenditures primarily related to the expansion of our installed equipment base with customers, particularly for plasma and hospital equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $0.6 million during fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 due to a $6.5 million increase in capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment,was partially offset by the benefita reduction in acquisition related investments of no acquisition-related payments. The increase$32.7 million in capital expenditures is the net effect of higher placements of company-owned equipment, primarily in support of increased plasma disposables demand, and the replacement of OrthoPAT devices, offset by lower manufacturing capital investments due to completion of construction of our Salt Lake City facility.fiscal 2014.

Financing Activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $492.3 million during the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, due primarily to a $475.0 million term loan used to finance the whole blood acquisition, $15.1 million of incremental proceeds from the exercise of share-based compensation and $5.6 million of short term borrowings from the fluctuation of working capital in Japan. These were offset by $5.5 million of debt issuance costs

32


paid related to the term loan closing. Net cash used to fund share repurchases under common stock repurchase programs was $50.0 million during fiscal 2013 and 2012.

Net cash used in financing activities increasedwas $62.6 million during fiscal 2016, an increase of $29.5 million as compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to $61.0 million of share repurchases during fiscal 2016 compared to $39.0 million of share repurchases during fiscal 2015. Higher term loan payments of $12.8 million also contributed to the increase. This was partially offset by $12.4 million during fiscal 2012 due primarily to a $25.4 million decreasean increase in cash flowshort-term loans and an increase in proceeds from the exercise of stock options offset by a $14.9 million decrease in net payments under short-term credit arrangements. options.

Net cash used in financing activities was $33.2 million during fiscal 2015, a decrease of $12.5 million as compared to fund share repurchases underfiscal 2014 primarily due to $39.0 million used to repurchase approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock repurchase programsstock. The increase was $50.0 million during partially offset by reduced payments towards the term loan in fiscal 2012 and 2011.2015.

Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
A summary of our contractual and commercial commitments as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, is as follows:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
(In thousands)Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years After 5 yearsTotal Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years
Debt$480,094
 $23,150
 $118,969
 $337,975
 $
$408,000
 $43,471
 $195,980
 $168,549
 $
Operating leases23,985
 7,742
 9,766
 3,788
 2,689
20,822
 4,845
 6,306
 3,528
 6,143
Purchase commitments*131,734
 126,734
 5,000
 
 
103,316
 98,607
 4,709
 
 
Expected retirement plan benefit payments10,611
 1,200
 2,635
 2,062
 4,714
16,253
 1,746
 3,065
 3,570
 7,872
Employee related commitments9,238
 8,568
 670
 
 
Total contractual obligations$646,424
 $158,826
 $136,370
 $343,825
 $7,403
$557,629
 $157,237
 $210,730
 $175,647
 $14,015

* Includes amounts we are committed to spend on purchase orders entered in the normal course of business for capital equipment and for the purpose of manufacturing our products including contract manufacturers, specifically JMS Co. Ltd., and Kawasumi Laboratories and Sanmina Corporation for the manufacture of certain disposable products.products and equipment. The majority of our operating expense spending does not require any advance commitment.
The above table does not reflect our long-term liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits of $7.4$2.3 million recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Due to the complexity associated with tax uncertainties related to these unrecognized benefits, weWe cannot reasonably make a reliable estimate of the period in which we expect to settle these long-term liabilities.liabilities due to factors outside of our control, such as tax examinations.
At the closing of the whole blood acquisition, we paid a total of $535.2 million in cash consideration following resolution of post-closing adjustments for working capital and historical earnings levels. We anticipate paying an additional $15.0$17.8 million upon replication and delivery of certain manufacturing assets of Pall's filter media business to Haemonetics by 2016.fiscal 2018.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are generally limited due to our large number of customers and their diversity across many geographic areas. A portion of our trade accounts receivable outside the United States, however, include sales to government-owned or supported healthcare systems in several countries, which are subject to payment delays. Payment is dependent upon the financial stability and creditworthiness of those countries' national economies.

WeAlthough we have not incurred significant losses on government receivables. Wereceivables to date, we continually evaluate all government receivables for potential collection risks associated with the availability of government funding and reimbursement practices. If the financial condition of customers or the countries' healthcare systems deteriorate such that their ability to make payments is uncertain, allowances may be required in future periods.

Deteriorating credit and economic conditions in parts of Western Europe, particularly in Italy, where our net accounts receivable is $23.4 million as of March 30, 2013, may increase the average length of time it takes us to collect accounts receivable in certain regions within these countries.
Contingent Commitments
Legal Proceedings
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although our ultimate liability cannot be determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.

Italian Employment Litigation
33


Fenwal (Fresenius) Patent Infringement
For the past six years,facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy where we have pursued patent infringement lawsuits against Fenwal Inc. seeking an injunctionceased manufacturing operations. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and damages fromminimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their infringementnational collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of a Haemonetics patent, through the salelow demand, are void, and (iii) payment of the ALYX brand automated red cell collection system,extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.
In addition, a competitor of our automated red cell collection systems.
Currently, we are pursuing a patent infringement actionunion represented in Germany against Fenwal, and its European and German subsidiary. On September 20, 2010, we filed a patent infringement action in Germany. In response, Fenwalthe Ascoli plant has filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to invalidaterecall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the Haemonetics patent whichunion from certain meetings.

Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.
As of April 2, 2016, the total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $4.6 million; however, it is not possible at this point in the subjectproceedings to accurately evaluate the likelihood or amount of this infringement action on December 1, 2010.any potential losses. We may receive other similar claims in the future.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity, and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs. Increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
During fiscal 2013, approximately 49.0%2016, 42.9% of our sales were generated outside the U.S., generally in foreign currencies, yet our reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency. Our primary foreign currency exposures relate to sales denominated in the Euro, Japanese Yen, Chinese Yuan and the Japanese Yen.Australian Dollars. We also have foreign currency exposure related to manufacturing and other operational costs denominated in the Swiss Franc, theFrancs, British Pound, thePounds, Canadian DollarDollars and Mexican Peso.Pesos. The Yen, Euro, Yuan and EuroAustralian Dollar sales exposure is partially mitigated by costs and expenses for foreign operations and sourcing products denominated in these foreign currencies. Since our foreign currency denominated Yen, Euro, Yuan and EuroAustralian Dollar sales exceed the foreign currency denominated costs, whenever the U.S. Dollar strengthens relative to the Yen, Euro, Yuan or Euro,Australian Dollar, there is an adverse effect on our results of operations and, conversely, whenever the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to the Yen, Euro, Yuan or Euro,Australian Dollar, there is a positive effect on our results of operations. For the Swiss Franc, theFrancs, British Pound,Pounds, Canadian Dollars and the Canadian Dollar,Mexican Pesos, our primary cash flows relate to product costs or costs and expenses of local operations. Whenever the U.S. Dollar strengthens relative to these foreign currencies, there is a positive effect on our results of operations. Conversely, whenever the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to these currencies, there is an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize, for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to a lesser extent the Swiss Franc,Francs, British Pound,Pounds, Australian Dollars, Canadian Dollars and the Canadian Dollar.Mexican Pesos. This does not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, to the extent hedged, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.
These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are intended to lock in the expected cash flows of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and costs at the available spot rate. Actual spot rate gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in sales and costs, at the same time the underlying transactions being hedged are recorded.hedges. The final impact of currency fluctuations on the results of operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the actual local currency results.

Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollar, Canadian Dollar, British Pound, and Swiss Franc and Mexican Peso cash flow hedges that settled during fiscal years 2014, 20132015 and 20122016 or are presently outstanding. These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales designated in the Euro, Japanese Yen and the Japanese Yen.Australian Dollars. These hedges also include our short positions associated with costs incurred in Canadian Dollars, British Pounds, Swiss Francs and Swiss Francs.Mexican Pesos. The table also shows how the strengthening or weakening of the spot rates associated with those hedge contracts versus the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the prior comparable period affects our results favorably or unfavorably. The table assumes a consistent notional amount for hedge contracts in each period presented.

34



First
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Second
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Third
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Fourth
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
Euro - Hedge Spot Rate (US$ per Euro)  
  
  
  
FY111.36
 (13)% 1.41
 (5)% 1.43
 8 % 1.35
 5 %
FY121.24
 (9)% 1.30
 (8)% 1.36
 (5)% 1.37
 1 %
FY131.43
 15 % 1.42
 9 % 1.36
  % 1.32
 (4)%
FY141.27
 (11)% 1.25
 (12)% 1.29
 (5)% 1.35
 2 %
Japanese Yen - Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per US$)  
  
  
  
FY1198.17
 (7)% 94.91
 (10)% 89.13
 (8)% 89.78
 (4)%
FY1288.99
 (9)% 85.65
 (10)% 81.73
 (8)% 82.45
 (8)%
FY1379.40
 (11)% 76.65
 (11)% 77.58
 (5)% 78.69
 (5)%
FY1479.85
 1 % 79.68
 4 % 84.32
 9 % 93.92
 19 %
Canadian Dollar - Hedge Spot Rate (CAD per US$)  
  
  
  
FY111.10
 (4)% 1.09
 (3)% 1.07
 (4)% 1.03
 (6)%
FY121.05
 (5)% 1.03
 (6)% 1.00
 (7)% 0.99
 (4)%
FY130.98
 (7)% 0.99
 (4)% 1.01
 1 % 1.00
 1 %
FY141.01
 3 % 1.00
 1 % 1.00
 (1)% 1.02
 2 %
British Pound - Hedge Spot Rate (US$  per GBP)  
    
  
FY111.47
 1 % 1.65
 15 % 1.63
 15 % 1.59
 14 %
FY121.50
 2 % 1.54
 (7)% 1.57
 (4)% 1.58
 (1)%
FY131.62
 8 % 1.63
 6 % 1.60
 2 % 1.57
 (1)%
FY141.59
 (2)% 1.57
 (4)%        
Swiss Franc - Hedge Spot Rate (CHF per US$)  
  
  
  
FY11 
  
 1.05
  
 1.04
  
 1.05
  
FY121.05
  
 1.01
 (4)% 0.96
 (8)% 0.92
 (12)%
FY130.82
 (22)% 0.85
 (16)% 0.92
 (4)% 0.92
  %
FY140.96
 17 % 0.95
 12 % 0.92
  % 0.94
 2 %
  First
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Second
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Third
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
 Fourth
Quarter
 Favorable /
(Unfavorable)
Sales Hedges
 Euro - Hedge Spot Rate (USD per Euro)  
  
  
  
 FY141.27
 (11)% 1.25
 (12)% 1.29
 (5)% 1.33
 1 %
 FY151.33
 5 % 1.35
 8 % 1.35
 5 % 1.37
 3 %
 FY161.35
 2 % 1.29
 (4)% 1.25
 (8)% 1.13
 (18)%
 FY171.09
 (19)% 1.11
 (14)% 1.06
 (15)% 1.11
 (2)%
 Japanese Yen - Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per USD)  
  
  
  
 FY1479.85
 (1)% 79.68
 (4)% 84.32
 (9)% 93.92
 (19)%
 FY1597.16
 (22)% 98.18
 (23)% 101.09
 (20)% 102.44
 (9)%
 FY16102.05
 (5)% 106.84
 (9)% 118.46
 (17)% 117.25
 (14)%
 FY17124.07
 (22)% 122.18
 (14)% 122.99
 (4)% 113.55
 3 %
 Australian Dollar - Hedge Spot Rate (USD per AUD)        
 FY14
  % 0.92
  % 0.91
  % 0.92
  %
 FY150.90
  % 0.94
 3 % 0.94
 3 % 0.90
 (2)%
 FY160.94
 4 % 0.91
 (3)% 0.85
 (10)% 0.79
 (12)%
 FY170.76
 (18)% 0.73
 (20)% 0.72
 (15)% 0.75
 (5)%
                 
Operating Hedges
 Canadian Dollar - Hedge Spot Rate (CAD per USD)  
  
  
  
 FY141.01
 3 % 1.00
 1 % 1.00
 (1)% 1.01
 1 %
 FY15
  % 
  % 1.08
 8 % 1.09
 8 %
 FY161.13
  % 1.14
  % 1.17
 9 % 1.25
 14 %
 FY171.24
 10 % 1.31
 15 % 1.35
 15 % 1.32
 6 %
 British Pound - Hedge Spot Rate (USD  per GBP)  
    
  
 FY141.59
 2 % 1.55
 5 % 1.52
 5 % 1.54
 2 %
 FY151.56
 2 % 1.57
 (1)% 1.62
 (7)% 1.65
 (7)%
 FY161.64
 (5)% 1.57
  % 1.57
 3 % 1.53
 7 %
 FY171.55
 5 % 
  % 
  % 
  %
 Swiss Franc - Hedge Spot Rate (CHF per USD)  
  
  
  
 FY140.96
 17 % 0.95
 12 % 0.92
  % 0.93
 1 %
 FY150.94
 (2)% 0.92
 (3)% 0.90
 (2)% 0.89
 (4)%
 FY160.90
 (5)% 0.95
 3 % 0.94
 4 % 0.92
 3 %
 FY170.93
 4 % 0.97
 2 % 1.01
 7 % 0.98
 7 %
 Mexican Peso - Hedge Spot Rate (MXN per USD)        
 FY1412.34
  % 12.35
  % 12.22
  % 12.20
  %
 FY1512.40
 1 % 13.06
 6 % 13.09
 7 % 13.08
 7 %
 FY1613.10
 6 % 13.07
  % 13.63
 4 % 14.46
 11 %
 FY1715.20
 16 % 15.73
 20 % 16.71
 23 % 17.27
 19 %
 FY1817.44
 15 % 
  % 
  % 
  %

We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New pronouncements issued but not effective until afterSee Note 2, March 30, 2013Summary of Significant Accounting Policies are not expected to have a material impactour consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on financial position, results of operation or liquidity.
GuidanceForm 10-K for additional information on Standards Implemented and Standards to be Implemented

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This Update requires an entity to disclose the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. The objective of this disclosure is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amended guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and interim periods within those annual periods. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial disclosures.Implemented.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


35


In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial disclosures.
Standards Implemented
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Update No. 2011-05 updates the disclosure requirements for comprehensive income to include total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The updated guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 using the two separate but consecutive statements approach. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 does not affect on our financial position or results of operations but changed our presentation of comprehensive income.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"), which changes the way a company completes its annual impairment review process. The provisions of this pronouncement provides an entity with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. ASU-2011-08 allows an entity the option to bypass the qualitative-assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The pronouncement does not change the current guidance for testing other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. This standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted these provisions in 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements. While all of these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and/or estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
The accounting policies identified as critical are as follows:
Revenue Recognition
WeOur revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenuerevenues from product sales, software and services in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and ASC Topic 985-605, Software. These standards require that revenue isrevenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We may have multiple contracts with the same customer and each contract is typically treated as a separate arrangement. When more than one element such as equipment, disposables, and services are contained in a single arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on each element’s relative selling price, provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. The selling price of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold separately, which constitutes vendor specific objective evidence as defined under ASC Topic 985-605, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by third-party evidence of selling price or by management's best estimate of selling price. For our software arrangements accounted for under the provisions of ASC 985-605, Software, we establish fair value of undelivered elements based upon vendor specific objective evidence.
We generally do not allow our customers to return products. We offer sales rebates and discounts to certain customers. We treat sales rebates and discounts as a reduction of revenue and classify the corresponding liability as current. We estimate rebates for products where there is sufficient historical information available to predict the volume of expected future rebates. If we are unable to estimate the expected rebates reasonably, we record a liability for the maximum potential rebate or discount that could be earned. In circumstances where we provide upfront rebate payments to customers, we capitalize the rebate payments and amortize the resulting asset as a reduction of revenue using a systematic method over the life of the contract.
We generally recognize revenue from the sale of perpetual licenses on a percentage-of-completion basis which requires us to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract. These arrangements most often include

36


providing customized implementation services to our customer. We also provide other services, including in some instances hosting, technical support, and maintenance, for the payment of periodic, monthly, or quarterly fees. We recognize these fees and charges as earned, typically as these services are provided during the contract period.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination, including licensed technology, are recorded under the purchase method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. We amortize our other intangible assets over their useful lives using the estimated economic benefit method, as applicable.
Goodwill is not amortized. Instead goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. ("Topic 350"), or on an interim basis between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. We perform our annual impairment test on the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter for each of our reporting units.
In performing our goodwill impairment assessment, we utilize the two-step approach prescribed under Topic 350. The first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting units, as defined, to the fair value of these units. We assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. We determine our reporting units by first performidentifying our operating segments, and then assess whether any components of these segments constitute a qualitative testbusiness for which discrete financial information is available and if necessary, perform a quantitative test. The quantitative test iswhere segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. We aggregate components within an operating segment that have similar economic characteristics. Our reporting units for purposes of assessing goodwill impairment are the same as our operating segments, which are organized primarily based on geography and include: (a) North America Plasma, (b) Americas Blood Center and Hospital, (c) Europe, Middle East, and Africa (collectively "EMEA"), (d) Asia-Pacific and (e) Japan. The North America Plasma reporting unit is a separate operating segment with dedicated segment management due the size and scale of the plasma business.

When allocating goodwill from business combinations to our reporting units, we assign goodwill to the reporting units that we expect to benefit from the respective business combination at the time of acquisition. In addition, for purposes of performing our goodwill impairment tests, assets and liabilities, including corporate assets, which relate to a reporting unit’s operations, and would be considered in determining its fair value, are allocated to the individual reporting units. We allocate assets and liabilities not directly related to a specific reporting unit, but from which the reporting unit benefits, based primarily on the respective revenue contribution of each reporting unit.
In fiscal 2016, we used the income approach, specifically the discounted cash flow analysis for each reporting unit. The test showed no evidence of impairmentmethod, to our goodwill for fiscal 2013, 2012 or 2011 and demonstrated thatderive the fair value of each of our reporting units in preparing our goodwill impairment assessments. This approach calculates fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting these after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. We selected this method as being the most meaningful in preparing our goodwill assessments because the use of the income approach typically generates a more precise measurement of fair value than the market approach. Due to the increased adverse business conditions impacting multiple Haemonetics reporting units in fiscal 2016, we determined that a more precise measure of fair value was required when performing our goodwill impairment review compared to what was performed in prior years.
In applying the income approach to our accounting for goodwill, we make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, terminal value growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows within our discounted cash flow analysis is based on our most recent operational budgets, long range strategic plans and other estimates. The terminal value growth rate is used to calculate the value of cash flows beyond the last projected period in our discounted cash flow analysis and reflects our best estimates for stable, perpetual growth of our reporting units. We use estimates of market-participant risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") as a basis for determining the discount rates to apply to our reporting units’ future expected cash flows. We corroborated the valuations that arose from the discounted cash flow approach by performing both a market multiple valuation and by reconciling the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our market capitalization at the time of the test.
In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we determined the fair value of our reporting units based on the market approach. We utilized the market approach as we determined relevant comparable information was available, and accordingly such method was an appropriate alternative to the income method. Under the market approach, we estimated the fair value of our reporting units based on a combination of, a) market multiples of projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and b) market multiples of projected net revenues for each individual reporting unit. For the market approach, we used judgment in identifying the relevant comparable-company market multiples, such as recent divestitures/acquisitions, facts and circumstances surrounding the market and growth rates. Management assessed the relevance and reliability of the multiples by considering factors unique to its reporting units, including recent operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, and other data. EBITDA and revenue multiples were also significantly exceededimpacted by future growth opportunities for the reporting unit’sunit as well as for the company itself, general market and geographic sentiment, and pending or recently completed merger transactions.
If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying value. To determine the implied fair value of goodwill, we allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in each period.a business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill. In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded that indicators of potential goodwill impairment were present for the EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units, requiring an interim test. We recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $66.3 million in the EMEA reporting unit during the third quarter of fiscal 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our second step of the goodwill impairment test and concluded that no adjustment to the estimated $66.3 million impairment loss initially recorded was required, as there was significant intangible value attributed to customer relationships and developed technology based on the theoretical purchase price allocation. Refer to Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding this goodwill impairment.
We review our intangible assets subject to amortization and their related useful lives periodicallyfor impairment at least annually or more frequently if certain conditions arise to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate that the carrying value of these assetsan asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Our review includes examination of whether certain conditions exist, including:recoverable, or that a change in the remaining useful life is required. Conditions indicating that an impairment exists include but are not limited to a change in the competitive landscape, any internal decisions to pursue new or different technology strategies, a loss of a significant customer or a significant change in the market placemarketplace including changes in the prices paid for our products or changes in the size of the market for our products. During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, we determined that there were potential impairment indicators

An impairment loss results iffor certain intangible assets subject to amortization. As such, we performed the recoverability test described below for the relevant asset groups. In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the asset groups identified. In fiscal 2016, however, we determined that the undiscounted cash flows did not support the carrying value of the asset groups identified and, accordingly, recorded impairment charges of $25.8 million, of which $18.7 million related to the write down of the SOLX intangible assets and the remaining $7.1 million related to intangible assets that were identified as part of the Company's global strategic review. Refer to Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding intangible asset impairments recorded.
When an impairment indicator exists, we test the intangible asset for recoverability. For purposes of the recoverability test, we group our amortizable intangible assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows if the intangible asset does not generate cash flows independent of other assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of the intangible asset (asset group) exceeds the estimatedundiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the intangible asset (asset group), we will write the carrying value down to the fair value in the period identified.
We generally calculate fair value of our intangible assets as the asset. Fairpresent value is determinedof estimated future cash flows we expect to generate from the asset using different methodologies depending upon the naturea risk-adjusted discount rate. In determining our estimated future cash flows associated with our intangible assets, we use estimates and assumptions about future revenue contributions, cost structures and remaining useful lives of the underlying asset. asset (asset group).
If we determine the estimate of an intangible asset’sasset's remaining useful life is changed,should be reduced based on our expected use of the asset, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over the revised remainingestimated useful life.

Inventory Provisions

We base our provisions for excess, expired and obsolete inventory primarily on our estimates of forecasted net sales. A significant change in the timing or level of demand for our products as compared to forecasted amounts may result in recording additional provisions for excess, expired and obsolete inventory in the future. Additionally, uncertain timing of next-generation product approvals, variability in product launch strategies, product recalls and variation in product utilization all affect our estimates related to excess, expired and obsolete inventory.

Income Taxes

The income tax provision is calculated for all jurisdictions in which we operate. ThisThe income tax provision process involves estimating actualcalculating current taxes due plusand assessing temporary differences arising from differing treatmentitems which are taxable or deductible in different periods for tax and accounting purposes thatand are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are periodically evaluated to determine their recoverabilityfor realizability and a valuation allowance is established with a corresponding additionalmaintained for the portion of our deferred tax assets that are not more-likely-than-not realizable.
We file income tax provision recordedreturns in our consolidated statements of income if their recovery is not considered likely. The provision for income taxes could also be materially impacted if actual taxes due differ from our earlier estimates.

all jurisdictions in which we operate. We record a liability for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Uncertain tax positions are unrecognized tax benefits for which reserves have been established. Our financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities' full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
We file incomerecord a liability for the portion of unrecognized tax returns in all jurisdictions inbenefits claimed which we operate. We establish a reserve to provide for additional income taxes that may be due in future years as these previously filedhave determined are not more-likely-than-not realizable. These tax returns are audited. These reserves have been established based on management's assessment as to the potential exposure attributable to permanent differencesour uncertain tax positions as well as interest and interest applicablepenalties attributable to both permanent and temporary differences.these uncertain tax positions. All tax reserves are analyzed periodicallyquarterly and adjustments are made as events occur that warrant modification.result in changes in judgment.


37

TableWe evaluate at the end of Contentseach reporting period whether some or all of the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are permanently reinvested. We recognize deferred income tax liabilities to the extent that management asserts that undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries are not permanently reinvested or will not be permanently reinvested in the future. Our position is based upon several factors including management’s evaluation of the Company and its subsidiaries’ financial requirements, the short term and long-term operational and fiscal objectives of the Company, and the tax consequences associated with the repatriation of earnings.

Valuation of Acquisitions
We allocate the amounts we pay for each acquisition to the assets we acquire and liabilities we assume based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition, including acquired identifiable intangible assets, and purchased research and development. We base the estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets on detailed valuations that use historical and forecasted information and market assumptions based upon the assumptions of a market participant. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. The use of alternative valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, and alternative estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations and intangible asset amortization expense in current and future periods.

In certain acquisitions, we have earn-out arrangements or contingent consideration to provide potential future payments to the seller for achieving certain agreed-upon financial targets. We record the contingent consideration at its fair value at the acquisition date. Generally, we have entered into arrangements with contingent consideration that require payments in cash. As such, we periodically revalue the contingent consideration obligations associated with certain acquisitions to their thencurrent fair value and record the change in the fair value as contingent consideration income or expense within selling, general and administrative expense. Increases or decreases in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in assumed discount periods and rates, changes in the assumed timing and amount of revenue and expense estimates, and changes in assumed probability adjustments with respect to regulatory approval. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions, as well as changes in any of the assumptions described above, can materially impact the amount of contingent consideration income or expense we record in any given period.
Contingencies
We may become involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, patent infringement, product liability and environmental matters. Accruals recorded for various contingencies including legal proceedings, employee related litigation, self-insurance and other claims are based on judgment, the probability of losses and, where applicable, the consideration of opinions of internal and/or external legal counsel and actuarially determined estimates. When a loss is probable and a range of loss is established but a best estimate cannot be made, we record the minimum loss contingency amount. These estimates are often initially developed substantially earlier than the ultimate loss is known, and the estimates are reevaluated each accounting period, as additional information is available. When we are initially unable to develop a best estimate of loss, we record the minimum amount of loss, which could be zero. As information becomes known, additional loss provision is recorded when either a best estimate can be made or the minimum loss amount is increased. When events result in an expectation of a more favorable outcome than previously expected, our best estimate is changed to a lower amount. We record receivables from third party insurers when we have determined that existing insurance policies will provide reimbursement. In making this determination, we consider applicable deductibles, policy limits and the historical payment experience of the insurance carriers.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “designed,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties includeanticipated, including: the effects of disruption from the acquisition of the Pall whole blood businessmanufacturing transformation making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees customers, vendors and other business partners, unexpected expenses incurred to integrate the Pall whole blood business, our ability to successfully execute on the transformation of our manufacturing network and our other value capture and creation activities,timely deliver high quality products, technological advances in the medical field and standards for transfusion medicine, and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such advances and standards, demand for whole blood and blood components, product quality, market acceptance, regulatory uncertainties, the ability of our contract manufacturing vendors to timely supply high quality goods, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, blood product reimbursement policies and practices, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers'customers’ ordering patterns including single-source tenders, the effect of industry consolidation as seen in the plasma market,and blood center markets, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate and such other risks described under Item 1A. Risk Factors included in this report. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.

38


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company’s exposures relative to market risk are due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk.
Foreign Exchange Risk
See the section above entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our business. It is our policy to minimize, for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and costs. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative or trading activities. At March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, we had the following significant foreign exchange contracts to hedge the anticipated foreign currency cash flows outstanding. The contracts have been organized into maturity groups and the related quarter that we expect the hedge contract to affect our earnings.
Hedged Currency 
(BUY)/SELL
Local Currency
 
Weighted
Spot
Contract Rate
 
Weighted
Forward
Contract Rate
 
Fair Value
Gain/(Loss)
 Maturity 
Quarter
Expected
to Affect
Earnings
 
(BUY)/SELL
Local Currency
 
Weighted
Spot
Contract Rate
 
Weighted
Forward
Contract Rate
 
Fair Value
Gain/(Loss)
 Maturity 
Quarter
Expected
to Affect
Earnings
EUR 7,609,000
 1.266
 1.272
 $(113,172) Mar 2013 - May 2013 Q1 FY14 5,949,000
 1.097
 1.105
 $(186,659) Mar 2016 - May 2016 Q1 FY17
EUR 8,474,000
 1.248
 1.253
 $(289,142) Jun 2013 - Aug 2013 Q2 FY14 8,096,000
 1.112
 1.120
 $(153,495) Jun 2016 - Aug 2016 Q2 FY17
EUR 8,549,000
 1.293
 1.297
 $64,875
 Sep 2013 - Nov 2013 Q3 FY14 8,258,000
 1.062
 1.074
 $(548,362) Sep 2016 - Nov 2016 Q3 FY17
EUR 6,539,000
 1.353
 1.355
 $403,373
 Dec 2013 -Feb 2014 Q4 FY14 8,941,000
 1.113
 1.127
 $(171,066) Dec 2016 - Feb 2017 Q4 FY17
YEN 895,856,000
 79.61 per US$
 79.13 per US$
 $1,795,161
 Mar 2013 - May 2013 Q1 FY14 685,671,000
 124.00 per USD
 123.08 per USD
 $(534,393) Mar 2016 - May 2016 Q1 FY17
YEN 1,415,955,000
 79.68 per US$
 79.35 per US$
 $2,739,127
 Jun 2013 - Aug 2013 Q2 FY14 959,900,000
 122.18 per USD
 121.17 per USD
 $(639,086) Jun 2016 - Aug 2016 Q2 FY17
YEN 1,473,623,000
 84.32 per US$
 84.03 per US$
 $1,798,356
 Sep 2013 - Nov 2013 Q3 FY14 912,121,000
 122.99 per USD
 121.63 per USD
 $(650,628) Sep 2016 - Nov 2016 Q3 FY17
YEN 1,415,536,000
 93.92 per US$
 93.57 per US$
 $53,287
 Dec 2013 -Feb 2014 Q4 FY14 879,600,000
 113.55 per USD
 112.02 per USD
 $(62,829) Dec 2016 - Feb 2017 Q4 FY17
GBP (777,000) 1.593
 1.590
 $(58,703) Feb 2012- Apr 2013 Q1 FY14
GBP (777,000) 1.568
 1.567
 $(40,758) May 2012- Jul 2013 Q2 FY14
CHF (3,754,000) 0.93 per USD
 0.92 per USD
 $(176,737) Apr 2016 - Jun 2016 Q1 FY17
CHF (5,050,000) 0.97 per USD
 0.95 per USD
 $(33,273) Jul 2016 - Sep 2016 Q2 FY17
CHF (4,959,000) 1.01 per USD
 0.99 per USD
 $190,986
 Oct 2016 - Dec 2016 Q3 FY17
CHF (4,952,000) 0.98 per USD
 0.96 per USD
 $67,812
 Jan 2017 - Mar 2017 Q4 FY17
CAD (1,868,000) 1.01 per US$
 1.02 per US$
 $2,483
 Mar 2013 - May 2013 Q1 FY14 (2,564,000) 1.24 per USD
 1.25 per USD
 $(96,929) Apr 2016 - Jun 2016 Q1 FY17
CAD (1,587,000) 1.00 per US$
 1.01 per US$
 $(22,283) Jun 2013 - Aug 2013 Q2 FY14 (1,979,000) 1.31 per USD
 1.32 per USD
 $6,630
 Jul 2016 - Sep 2016 Q2 FY17
CAD (1,853,000) 1.00 per US$
 1.01 per US$
 $(29,503) Sep 2013 - Nov 2013 Q3 FY14 (1,730,000) 1.35 per USD
 1.35 per USD
 $36,257
 Oct 2016 - Dec 2016 Q3 FY17
CAD (436,000) 1.02 per US$
 1.03 per US$
 $2,102
 Dec 2013 - Feb 2014 Q4 FY14 (2,054,000) 1.32 per USD
 1.32 per USD
 $8,959
 Jan 2017 - Feb 2017 Q4 FY17
CHF (5,527,000) 0.96 per US$
 0.95 per US$
 $10,666
 Apr 2013 - Jun 2013 Q1 FY14
CHF (6,083,000) 0.95 per US$
 0.95 per US$
 $8,425
 Jul 2013 - Sep 2013 Q2 FY14
CHF (7,070,000) 0.92 per US$
 0.91 per US$
 $(236,730) Jul 2013 - Sep 2013 Q3 FY14
CHF (1,604,800) 0.94 per US$
 0.94 per US$
 $(11,474) Oct 2013 - Dec 2013 Q4 FY14
MXN (8,629,000) 12.34 per US$
 12.36 per US$
 $(891) Feb 2013 - Apr 2013 Q1 FY14 (11,176,000) 15.40 per USD
 15.78 per USD
 $(66,733) Feb 2016 - Apr 2016 Q1 FY17
MXN (8,629,000) 12.39 per US$
 12.45 per US$
 $2,275
 May 2013- Jul 2013 Q2 FY14 (39,249,000) 15.73 per USD
 16.17 per USD
 $(184,500) May 2016 - Jul 2016 Q2 FY17
MXN (42,000,000) 16.71 per USD
 17.17 per USD
 $(66,786) Aug 2016 - Oct 2016 Q3 FY17
MXN (44,453,000) 17.27 per USD
 17.71 per USD
 $(12,751) Nov 2016 - Jan 2017 Q4 FY17
MXN (32,529,000) 17.44 per USD
 17.97 per USD
 $4,738
 Feb 2017 - Mar 2017 Q1 FY18
AUD 2,228,000
 0.765
 0.752
 $(22,700) Jan 2016 - Mar 2016 Q1 FY17
AUD 2,610,000
 0.727
 0.715
 $(114,844) Apr 2016 - Jun 2016 Q2 FY17
AUD 2,979,000
 0.719
 0.708
 $(139,481) Jul 2016 - Sep 2016 Q3 FY17
AUD 3,320,000
 0.755
 0.745
 $(28,687) Oct 2016 - Dec 2016 Q4 FY17
       $6,077,474
           $(3,574,557)    
We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10% strengthening and weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the event of a 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts would result in a $11.1$6.2 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10% weakening of the USU.S. dollar would result in a $11.8$6.2 million decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates is associated with borrowings on our Credit Agreement, all of which is variable rate debt. All other long-term debt is at fixed rates. Total outstanding debt under our Credit Facilities for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 was $475.0$408.1 million with an interest rate of 1.625%1.875% based on prevailing Adjusted LIBOR rates. An increase of 100 basis points in Adjusted LIBOR rates would result in additional annual interest expense of $4.8 million.$4.1 million. On December 21, 2012, we entered into interest rate swap

agreements to effectively convert $250.0$250.0 million of borrowings from a variable rate to a fixed rate. The interest rate swaps qualify for hedge accounting treatment as cash flow hedges.



39

TableReport of ContentsIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Haemonetics Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries as of April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of (loss) income, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 2, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries at April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended April 2, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Haemonetics Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated June 1, 2016 expressed an adverse opinion thereon.

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 1, 2016

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year EndedYear Ended
March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
          
Net revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
Cost of goods sold463,859
 358,604
 321,485
502,918
 475,955
 470,144
Gross profit428,131
 369,240
 355,209
405,914
 434,418
 468,365
Operating expenses: 
  
  
 
  
  
Research and development44,394
 36,801
 32,656
44,965
 54,187
 54,200
Selling, general and administrative323,053
 245,261
 213,899
317,223
 337,168
 365,977
Contingent consideration income
 (1,580) (1,894)
Asset write-down4,247
 
 
Impairment of assets92,395
 5,441
 1,711
Contingent consideration (income) expense(4,727) (2,918) 45
Total operating expenses371,694
 280,482
 244,661
449,856
 393,878
 421,933
Operating income56,437
 88,758
 110,548
Other income (expense), net(6,540) 740
 (467)
Income before provision for income taxes49,897
 89,498
 110,081
Operating (loss) income(43,942) 40,540
 46,432
Other expense, net(9,474) (9,375) (10,031)
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes(53,416) 31,165
 36,401
Provision for income taxes11,097
 22,612
 30,101
2,163
 14,268
 1,253
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income per share - basic$0.76
 $1.32
 $1.59
Net income per share - diluted$0.74
 $1.30
 $1.56
Net (loss) income per share - basic$(1.09) $0.33
 $0.68
Net (loss) income per share - diluted$(1.09) $0.32
 $0.67
          
Weighted average shares outstanding 
  
  
 
  
  
Basic51,349
 50,727
 50,154
50,910
 51,533
 51,611
Diluted52,259
 51,590
 51,192
50,910
 52,089
 52,377
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


40


HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands)
 Year Ended
 March 30, 2013
 March 31, 2012
 April 2, 2011
      
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
      
Other comprehensive (loss)/income:     
Impact of defined benefit plans, net of tax(820) (3,988) 555
Foreign currency translation adjustment(4,705) (2,813) 6,380
Unrealized (loss)/gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax4,594
 3,140
 (4,068)
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge losses/(gains), net of tax(2,746) 3,230
 769
Other comprehensive (loss)/income(3,677) (431) 3,636
Comprehensive income$35,123
 $66,455
 $83,616
      
 Year Ended
 April 2, 2016 March 28, 2015 March 29, 2014
      
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
      
Other comprehensive loss:     
Impact of defined benefit plans, net of tax1,431
 (4,331) 481
Foreign currency translation adjustment(1,987) (23,710) (935)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax(3,938) 11,371
 5,001
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge gains, net of tax(8,822) (6,464) (8,570)
Other comprehensive loss(13,316) (23,134) (4,023)
Comprehensive (loss) income$(68,895) $(6,237) $31,125
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


41


HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
ASSETSASSETS   
Current assets: 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$179,120
 $228,861
$115,123
 $160,662
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,727 at March 30, 2013 and $1,480 at March 31, 2012170,111
 135,464
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,253 at April 2, 2016 and $1,749 at March 28, 2015157,093
 145,827
Inventories, net183,784
 117,163
187,028
 211,077
Deferred tax asset, net13,782
 9,665
Prepaid expenses and other current assets50,213
 35,976
28,842
 40,103
Total current assets597,010
 527,129
488,086
 557,669
Property, plant and equipment: 
  
Land, building and building improvements82,898
 59,816
Plant equipment and machinery205,698
 136,057
Office equipment and information technology103,235
 88,185
Haemonetics equipment240,889
 226,476
Total property, plant and equipment632,720
 510,534
Less: accumulated depreciation(375,767) (348,877)
Net property, plant and equipment256,953
 161,657
Other assets: 
  
Intangible assets264,388
 96,549
Property, plant and equipment, net337,634
 321,948
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $190,816 at April 2, 2016 and $133,175 at March 28, 2015204,458
 244,588
Goodwill330,474
 115,058
267,840
 334,310
Deferred tax asset, long term1,751
 23
7,055
 15,631
Other long-term assets11,341
 10,719
14,055
 11,271
Total other assets607,954
 222,349
Total assets$1,461,917
 $911,135
$1,319,128
 $1,485,417
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Current liabilities: 
  
 
  
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt$23,150
 $894
$43,471
 $21,522
Accounts payable49,893
 35,425
39,674
 48,425
Accrued payroll and related costs45,697
 29,451
35,798
 51,115
Accrued income taxes4,053
 8,075
Other liabilities57,351
 56,899
Other current liabilities66,608
 67,622
Total current liabilities180,144
 130,744
185,551
 188,684
Long-term debt, net of current maturities456,944
 2,877
364,529
 406,369
Long-term deferred tax liability29,552
 23,332
21,377
 32,505
Other long-term liabilities26,095
 21,551
26,106
 31,737
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

Stockholders’ equity: 
  
 
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized — 150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding — 51,031,563 shares at March 30, 2013 and 50,603,798 shares at March 31, 2012510
 506
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized — 150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding — 50,932,348 shares at April 2, 2016 and 51,670,969 shares at March 28, 2015509
 517
Additional paid-in capital365,040
 322,232
439,912
 426,964
Retained earnings398,199
 400,783
316,184
 420,365
Accumulated other comprehensive income5,433
 9,110
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(35,040) (21,724)
Total stockholders’ equity769,182
 732,631
721,565
 826,122
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$1,461,917
 $911,135
$1,319,128
 $1,485,417

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


42


HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except per share data)
Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
 Retained 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
 
Total
Stockholders’
Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in Capital
 Retained Earnings 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
 
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
Shares $’s Capital Earnings Income/(Loss) EquityShares Par Value 
Balance, April 3, 201050,882
 $508
 $252,070
 $334,641
 $5,905
 $593,124
Employee stock purchase plan156
 2
 3,679
 
 
 3,681
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit2,024
 20
 44,885
 
 
 44,905
Shares repurchased(1,814) (18) (8,991) (40,991) 
 (50,000)
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations72
 1
 (1) 
 
 
Stock compensation expense
 
 10,810
 
 
 10,810
Net income
 
 
 79,980
 
 79,980
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
 
 
 3,636
 3,636
Balance, April 2, 201151,320
 $513
 $302,452
 $373,630
 $9,541
 $686,136
Employee stock purchase plan154
 2
 3,721
 
 
 3,723
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit738
 7
 17,021
 
 
 17,028
Shares repurchased(1,704) (17) (10,248) (39,733) 
 (49,998)
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations96
 1
 
 
 
 1
Stock compensation expense
 
 9,286
 
 
 9,286
Net income
 
 
 66,886
 
 66,886
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
 
 
 (431) (431)
Balance, March 31, 201250,604
 $506
 $322,232
 $400,783
 $9,110
 $732,631
Balance, March 30, 201351,032
 $510
 $365,040
 $398,199
 $5,433
 $769,182
Employee stock purchase plan151
 1
 4,141
 
 
 4,142
161
 2
 5,227
 
 
 5,229
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit1,398
 14
 35,801
 
 
 35,815
740
 7
 19,263
 
 
 19,270
Stock-based compensation adjustment related to acquisition
 
 504
 
 
 504

 
 
 
 
 
Shares repurchased(1,236) (12) (8,607) (41,384) 
 (50,003)
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations115
 1
 
 
 
 1
108
 1
 
 
 
 1
Stock compensation expense
 
 10,969
 
 
 10,969

 
 13,081
 
 
 13,081
Net income
 
 
 38,800
 
 38,800

 
 
 35,148
 
 35,148
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
 
 
 
 (3,677) (3,677)
Balance, March 30, 201351,032
 $510
 $365,040
 $398,199
 $5,433
 $769,182
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (4,023) (4,023)
Balance, March 29, 201452,041
 $520
 $402,611
 $433,347
 $1,410
 $837,888
Employee stock purchase plan183
 2
 4,761
 
 
 4,763
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit500
 5
 14,640
 
 
 14,645
Shares repurchased(1,174) (11) (9,143) (29,879) 
 (39,033)
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations121
 1
 
 
 
 1
Stock compensation expense
 
 14,095
 
 
 14,095
Net income
 
 
 16,897
 
 16,897
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (23,134) (23,134)
Balance, March 28, 201551,671
 $517
 $426,964
 $420,365
 $(21,724) $826,122
Employee stock purchase plan145
 1
 4,340
 
 
 4,341
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit492
 6
 14,026
 
 
 14,032
Shares repurchased(1,488) (15) (12,367) (48,602) 
 (60,984)
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations112
 
 
 
 
 
Stock compensation expense
 
 6,949
 
 
 6,949
Net loss
 
 
 (55,579) 
 (55,579)
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (13,316) (13,316)
Balance, April 2, 201650,932
 $509
 $439,912
 $316,184
 $(35,040) $721,565

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


43


HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended
 March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: 
  
  
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
Non cash items: 
  
  
Depreciation and amortization65,481
 49,966
 48,145
Amortization of financing costs1,139
 
 
Stock compensation expense10,969
 9,286
 10,810
Deferred tax expense589
 5,878
 5,782
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment351
 772
 674
Unrealized loss from hedging activities700
 166
 (614)
Contingent consideration income
 (1,580) (1,894)
Reversal of interest expense on contingent consideration
 (574) (416)
Asset write-down4,247
 
 
Change in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
  
Increase in accounts receivable, net(38,080) (10,539) (3,920)
Increase in inventories(18,685) (32,528) (2,560)
(Increase)/decrease in prepaid income taxes(4,025) 3,058
 1,680
(Increase)/decrease in other assets and other long-term liabilities(6,187) 3,156
 (470)
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options4,194
 1,958
 4,941
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses25,581
 19,413
 (18,683)
Net cash provided by operating activities85,074
 115,318
 123,455
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
  
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment(62,188) (53,198) (46,669)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment1,968
 1,002
 1,468
   Acquisition of Whole Blood Business(535,175) 
 
Acquisition of Global Med Technologies
 
 (128)
Acquisition of ACCS
 
 (6,229)
Investment in Hemerus(1,000) 
 
Net cash used in investing activities(596,395) (52,196) (51,558)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage(886) (815) (632)
Net (decrease)/increase in short-term loans7,446
 (288) (15,153)
Term loan borrowings475,000
 
 
Debt issuance costs(5,467) 
 
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan4,142
 3,723
 3,681
Proceeds from exercise of stock options27,517
 15,475
 40,896
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options4,101
 1,433
 3,124
Share repurchase(50,000) (49,998) (50,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities461,853
 (30,470) (18,084)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents(273) (498) 1,332
Net (Decrease)/Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents(49,741) 32,154
 55,145
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year228,861
 196,707
 141,562
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$179,120
 $228,861
 $196,707
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: 
  
  
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placement of Haemonetics equipment21,677
 18,333
 5,069
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: 
  
  
Interest paid$5,910
 $414
 $487
Income taxes paid$13,178
 $10,764
 $16,669
 Year Ended
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: 
  
  
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
Non-cash items: 
  
  
Depreciation and amortization89,911
 86,053
 81,740
Impairment of assets101,243
 5,877
 2,587
Stock compensation expense6,949
 14,095
 13,082
Deferred tax (benefit) expense(1,038) 4,230
 1,736
Unrealized (gain)/loss from hedging activities(2,645) 1,558
 (128)
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration(4,727) (2,918) 45
Provision for losses on accounts receivable and inventory13,053
 4,972
 3,020
Other non-cash operating activities899
 1,055
 5,367
Change in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
  
Change in accounts receivable, net(10,328) 8,446
 6,063
Change in inventories11,896
 (21,515) (15,613)
Change in prepaid income taxes(651) 10,662
 1,175
Change in other assets and other liabilities3,121
 (8,013) 3,176
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options
 3,786
 1,649
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses(30,239) 1,993
 477
Net cash provided by operating activities121,865
 127,178
 139,524
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
  
Capital expenditures(102,405) (122,220) (73,648)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment637
 452
 488
Acquisition of Hemerus
 
 (23,124)
Other acquisitions and investments(3,000) 
 (9,546)
Net cash used in investing activities(104,768) (121,768) (105,830)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage(943) (1,048) (964)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term loans2,272
 843
 (5,521)
Repayment of term loan borrowings(21,342) (8,531) (37,063)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan4,341
 4,763
 5,229
Proceeds from exercise of stock options14,032
 9,290
 15,225
Share repurchases(60,984) (39,033) 
Other financing activities
 556
 2,395
Net cash used in financing activities(62,624) (33,160) (20,699)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents(12) (4,057) 354
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents(45,539) (31,807) 13,349
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year160,662
 192,469
 179,120
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$115,123
 $160,662
 $192,469
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: 
  
  
Interest paid$8,511
 $8,497
 $8,942
Income taxes paid$7,829
 $11,211
 $7,261
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placement of Haemonetics equipment$9,663
 $7,458
 $10,584
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

44


HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Haemonetics is a global healthcare company dedicated to providing innovative bloodproducts to customers involved in the processing, handling and analysis of blood. We offer a comprehensive portfolio of integrated devices and information management solutions for our customers — plasma collectors, blood collectors, and hospitals. Anchored by our strong brand name in medical device systems fortools with the transfusion industry, we also provide information technology platforms and value added services to provide customers with business solutions which support improvedgoal of helping improve clinical outcomes for patients and efficiency in the blood supply chain.
Our systems automate the collection and processing of donated blood; perform blood diagnostics; salvage and process surgical patient blood; and dispense blood within the hospital. These systems include devices and single-use, proprietary disposable sets that operate only on our specialized equipment. Our manual blood collection and filtration systems enable the manual collection of all blood components while detecting bacteria, thus reducing the risks of infection through transfusion. Our blood processing systems allow users to collect and process only the blood component(s) they target — plasma, platelets, or red blood cells — increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection efficiencies. Our blood diagnostics system assesses the likelihood of a patient’s blood loss allowing clinicians to make informed decisions about a patient’s treatment as it relates to blood loss in surgery. Our surgical blood salvage systems collect blood lost by a patient in surgery, clean the blood, and make it availablereduce costs for reinfusion to the patient, in this way giving the patient the safest blood possible — his or her own. Our blood distribution systems are “smart” refrigerators located throughout hospitals which automate the storage, inventory tracking, and dispositioning of blood in key blood use areas.
Our information technology platforms are used by blood and plasma collectors, hospitals, and patients around the world.

Blood and its components (plasma, platelets, and red cells) have many vital - and frequently life-saving - clinical applications. Plasma is used for patients with major blood loss and is manufactured into pharmaceuticals to improve the safetytreat a variety of illnesses and efficiencyhereditary disorders such as hemophilia. Red cells treat trauma patients or patients undergoing surgery with high blood loss, such as open heart surgery or organ transplant. Platelets treat cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Blood is essential to a modern healthcare system.

Haemonetics develops and markets a wide range of blooddevices and solutions to serve our customers. We provide plasma collection logistics by eliminating previously manual functions at not-for-profit blood centerssystems and commercialsoftware which enable plasma centers. Our platforms are also used by hospitalsfractionators to make life saving pharmaceuticals. We provide analytical devices for measuring hemostasis which enable hospital administrators to monitor and measure blood management practices and to manage processes within transfusion services. Our information technology platforms allow all customershealthcare providers to better manage processes across thetheir patients’ bleeding risk. Haemonetics makes blood supply chain, comply with regulatory requirements,processing systems and identify increased opportunities to reduce costs.

On November 30, 2012 the Company completed a two-for-one split of the Company's common stock in the form of a stock dividend. Unless otherwise indicated, all common stock sharessoftware which make blood donation more efficient and per share information referenced within the Consolidated Financial Statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split. The exercise price of each outstanding option has also been proportionatelytrack life giving blood components. Finally, Haemonetics supplies systems and retroactively adjusted for all periods presented. Par value per sharesoftware which facilitate blood transfusions and authorized shares were however not affected by the stock split.cell processing.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements present separately our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity. All amounts presented, except per share amounts, are stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

The Company considersWe consider events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated, and these financial statements reflect those material items that aroseRefer to Note 15, Restructuring, for information pertaining to our new restructuring initiative, which was approved after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements that would be considered recognizedstatements. There were no other material subsequent events. Refer to Note 19 - Subsequent Events for further information.events identified.
2.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal years 2013, 2012year 2016 includes 53 weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and 2011each includes the fourth quarter having 14 weeks. Fiscal year 2015 and 2014 included 52 weeks with each quarter having 13 weeks.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts including those of our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


45

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could vary from the amounts derived from our estimates and assumptions. We consider estimates to be critical if we are required to make assumptions about material matters that are uncertain at the time of estimation or if materially different estimates could have been made or it is reasonably likely that the accounting estimate will change from period to period. The following are areas considered to be critical and require management’s judgment: revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory provisions, intangible asset and goodwill valuation, legal and other judgmental accruals, and income taxes.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years' amounts to conform to the current year's presentation.

53

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Contingencies
We may become involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, patent infringement, product liability and environmental matters. Accruals recorded for various contingencies including legal proceedings, employee related litigation, self-insurance and other claims are based on judgment, the probability of losses and, where applicable, the consideration of opinions of internal and/or external legal counsel and actuarially determined estimates. When a loss is probable and a range of loss is established but a best estimate cannot be made, we record the minimum loss contingency amount, which could be zero. These estimates are often initially developed substantially earlier than the ultimate loss is known, and the estimates are reevaluated each accounting period, as additional information is available. As information becomes known, an additional loss provision is recorded when either a best estimate can be made or the minimum loss amount is increased. When events result in an expectation of a more favorable outcome than previously expected, our best estimate is changed to a lower amount.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues from product sales, software and services in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and ASC Topic 985-605, Software. These standards require that revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We may have multiple contracts with the same customer and each contract is typically treated as a separate arrangement. When more than one element such as equipment, disposables, and services are contained in a single arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on each element’s relative selling price, provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. The selling price of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold separately, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by third-party evidence of selling price or by management's best estimate of selling price. For our software arrangements accounted for under the provisions of ASC 985-605, Software, we establish fair value of undelivered elements based upon vendor specific objective evidence.

We offer sales rebates and discounts to certain customers. We treat sales rebates and discounts as a reduction of revenue and classify the corresponding liability as current. We estimate rebates for products where there is sufficient historical information available to predict the volume of expected future rebates. If we are unable to estimate the expected rebates reasonably, we record a liability for the maximum potential rebate or discount that could be earned. In circumstances where we provide upfront rebate payments to customers, we capitalize the rebate payments and amortize the resulting asset as a reduction of revenue using a systematic method over the life of the contract.
Product Revenues

Product sales consist of the sale of our disposable whole blood and blood component collection and processing sets equipment devices and the related disposables used with these devices.equipment. On product sales to end customers, revenue is recognized when both the title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer as determined by the shipping terms and all obligations have been completed. For product sales to distributors, we recognize revenue for both equipment and disposables upon shipment of these products to our distributors. Our standard contracts with our distributors state that title to the equipment passes to the distributors at point of shipment to a distributor’s location. The distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. Shipments toPayments from distributors are not contingent upon resale of the product.

Non-Income Taxes

We are requiredalso place equipment at customer sites. While we retain ownership of this equipment, the customer has the right to collect sales or valued added taxes in connection withuse it for a period of time provided they meet certain agreed to conditions. We recover the cost of providing the equipment from the sale of certain of our products. We report revenues net of these amounts as they are promptly remitted to the relevant taxing authority.

We are also required to pay a medical device excise tax relating to U.S. sales of Class I, II and III medical devices. This new excise tax went into effect January 1, 2013, established as part of the March 2010 U.S. healthcare reform legislation, and has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

disposables.
Software Revenues

Our software solutions business provides support to our plasma, and blood collection customers and hospitals.hospital customers. We provide information technology platforms and technical support for donor recruitment, blood and plasma testing laboratories, and for efficient and compliant operations of blood and plasma collection centers. For plasma customers, we also provide information technology platforms for managing distribution of plasma from collection centers to plasma fractionation facilities. For hospitals, we provide solutions to help improve patient safety, reduce cost and ensure compliance.
Our software solutions revenues also include revenue from software sales which includes per collection or monthly subscription fees for the license and support of the software as well as hosting services. A significant portion of our software sales are perpetual licenses typically accompanied with significant implementation service fees related to software customization as well as other professional and technical service fees.

54

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


We generally recognize revenue from the sale of perpetual licenses on a percentage-of-completion basis which requires us to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract. These arrangements most often include providing customized implementation services to our customer. We also provide other services, including in some instances

46

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


hosting, technical support, and maintenance, for the payment of periodic, monthly, or quarterly fees. We recognize these fees and charges as earned, typically as these services are provided during the contract period.
Non-Income Taxes
We are required to collect sales or valued added taxes in connection with the sale of certain of our products. We report revenues net of these amounts as they are promptly remitted to the relevant taxing authority.
We are also required to pay a medical device excise tax relating to U.S. sales of Class I, II and III medical devices. This excise tax went into effect January 1, 2013, established as part of the March 2010 U.S. healthcare reform legislation, and has been included in selling, general and administrative expenses. In December 2015, this tax was suspended for two years, beginning on January 1, 2016. This tax may be imposed again beginning on January 1, 2018, unless the suspension is extended or the medical device excise tax is permanently repealed.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange at year-end while sales and expenses are translated at an average rate in effect during the year. The net effect of these translation adjustments is shown in the accompanying financial statements as a component of stockholders' equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, including those resulting from inter-companyintercompany transactions, are charged directly to earnings and included in other income,expense, net on the consolidated statements of (loss) income. The impact of foreign exchange on long-term intercompany loans, for which repayment has not been scheduled or planned, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss on the consolidated balance sheet.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include various instruments such as money market funds, U.S. government obligations and commercial paper with maturities of three months or less at date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair market value. As of March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents consisted of investments in United States Government Agency and Institutional Money Market Funds.institutional money market funds.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We establish a specific allowance for customers when it is probable that they will not be able to meet their financial obligation. Customer accounts are reviewed individually on a regular basis and appropriate reserves are established as deemed appropriate. We also maintain a general reserve using a percentage that is established based upon the age of our receivables.receivables and our collection history. We establish allowances for balances not yet due and past due accounts based on past experience.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined with the first-in, first-out method. We have based our provisions for excess, expired and obsolete inventory primarily on our estimates of forecasted net sales. Significant changes in the timing or level of demand for our products results in recording additional provisions for excess, expired and obsolete inventory. Additionally, uncertain timing of next-generation product approvals, variability in product launch strategies, non-cancelable purchase commitments, product recalls and variation in product utilization all affect our estimates related to excess, expired and obsolete inventory.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at historical cost. We provide for depreciation and amortization by charges to operations using the straight-line method in amounts estimated to recover the cost of the building and improvements, equipment, and furniture and fixtures over their estimated useful lives as follows:

55

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Asset Classification 
Estimated
Useful Lives
Building 30 yearsYears
Building improvements 5-20 Years
Plant equipment and machinery 3-103-15 Years
Office equipment and information technology 3-102-10 Years
Haemonetics equipment 3-7 Years

We evaluate the depreciation periods of property, plant and equipment to determine whether events or circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives. All property, plant and equipment are also tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Our installed base of devices includes devices owned by us and devices sold to the customer. The asset on our balance sheet entitledclassified as Haemonetics equipment consists of medical devices installed at customer sites but owned by Haemonetics. Generally the customer has the right to use it for a period of time as long as they meet the conditions we have established, which among other things, generally include one or more of the following:

Purchase and consumption of a certain level of disposable productproducts
Payment of monthly rental fees
An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of procedures per month per device

Consistent with the impairment tests noted below for other intangible assets subject to amortization, we review Haemonetics equipment and their related useful lives at least once a year, or more frequently if certain conditions arise, to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. To conduct these reviews we estimate the future amount and timing of demand for disposables used with these devices.devices, from which we generate revenues. We also consider product life cycle in our evaluation of useful life and recoverability. Changes in expected demand can result in additional

47

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


depreciation expense, which is classified as cost of goods sold. Any significant unanticipated changes in demand could impact the value of our devices and our reported operating results.
Leasehold improvements are amortizeddepreciated over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Maintenance and repairs are generally expensed to operations as incurred. When the repair or maintenance costs significantly extend the life of the asset, these costs may be capitalized. When equipment and improvements are sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is included in the statements of income.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recorded under the purchase method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and other identifiable intangible assets acquired. We amortize our other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives.

Goodwill is not amortized. Instead goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. ("Topic 350"), or on an interim basis between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. We perform our annual impairment test on the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter for each of our reporting units.

In performing our goodwill impairment assessment, we utilize the two-step approach prescribed under Topic 350. The first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting units, as defined, to the fair value of these units. We assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. We determine our reporting units by first performidentifying our operating segments, and then by assessing whether any components of these segments constitute a qualitative testbusiness for which discrete financial information is available and if necessary, perform a quantitative test. The quantitative test iswhere segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. We aggregate components within an operating segment that have similar economic characteristics. Our reporting units for purposes of assessing goodwill impairment are the same as our operating segments, which are organized primarily based on geography and include: (a) North America Plasma, (b) Americas Blood Center and Hospital, (c) Europe, Middle East, and Africa (collectively "EMEA"), (d) Asia-Pacific and (e) Japan. The North America Plasma reporting unit is a separate operating segment with dedicated segment management due the size and scale of the plasma business.

When allocating goodwill from business combinations to our reporting units, we assign goodwill to the reporting units that we expect to benefit from the respective business combination at the time of acquisition. In addition, for purposes of performing our goodwill impairment tests, assets and liabilities, including corporate assets, which relate to a reporting unit’s operations,

56

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


and would be considered in determining its fair value, are allocated to the individual reporting units. We allocate assets and liabilities not directly related to a specific reporting unit, but from which the reporting unit benefits, based primarily on the respective revenue contribution of each reporting unit.

In fiscal 2016, we used the income approach, specifically the discounted cash flow analysis for each reporting unit. Discounted cash flow analysis is an income approachmethod, to determiningderive the fair value of aeach of our reporting unit utilizing estimatedunits in preparing our goodwill impairment assessments. This approach calculates fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to thea reporting unit which areand then discounteddiscounting these after-tax cash flows to a present value based onusing a risk-adjusted discount rate. We selected this method as being the most meaningful in preparing our goodwill assessments because the use of the income approach typically generates a more precise measurement of fair value than the market approach. Due to the increased adverse business conditions impacting multiple Haemonetics reporting units in fiscal 2016, we determined that a more precise measure of fair value was required when performing our goodwill impairment review compared to what was performed in prior years.

In applying the income approach to our accounting for goodwill, we make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, terminal value growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows for thiswithin our discounted cash flow analysis are determined primarilyis based on revenue growth rates, operating margins and other projections from our most recent operational budgets, and long range strategic plans.plans and other estimates. The test showed no evidenceterminal value growth rate is used to calculate the value of impairmentcash flows beyond the last projected period in our discounted cash flow analysis and reflects our best estimates for stable, perpetual growth of our reporting units. We use estimates of market-participant risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital ("WACC") as a basis for determining the discount rates to apply to our goodwill forreporting units’ future expected cash flows. We corroborated the valuations that arose from the discounted cash flow approach by performing both a market multiple valuation and by reconciling the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our market capitalization at the time of the test.
In fiscal 2013, 2012 or 20112015 and demonstrated that2014, we determined the fair value of our reporting units based on the market approach. We utilized the market approach as we determined relevant comparable information was available, and accordingly such method was an appropriate alternative to the income method. Under the market approach, we estimated the fair value of our reporting units based on a combination of, a) market multiples of projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and b) market multiples of projected net revenues for each individual reporting unit. For the market approach, we used judgment in identifying the relevant comparable-company market multiples, such as recent divestitures/acquisitions, facts and circumstances surrounding the market and growth rates. Management assessed the relevance and reliability of the multiples by considering factors unique to its reporting units, including recent operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, and other data. EBITDA and revenue multiples were also significantly impacted by future growth opportunities for the reporting unit significantly exceededas well as for the company itself, general market and geographic sentiment, and pending or recently completed merger transactions.

If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying value. To determine the implied fair value of goodwill, we allocate the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit’s carryingunit had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill. In the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we concluded that indicators of potential goodwill impairment were present for the EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units, requiring an interim test. We recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $66.3 million in each period.the EMEA reporting unit during the third quarter of fiscal 2016. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our second step of the goodwill impairment test and concluded that no adjustment to the estimated $66.3 million impairment loss initially recorded was required, as there was significant intangible value attributed to customer relationships and developed technology based on the theoretical purchase price allocation. Refer to Note 5,

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for additional details regarding goodwill impairment.
We review intangible assets subject to amortization for impairment at least annually or more frequently if certain conditions arise to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable, or that a change in the remaining useful life is required. Conditions indicating that an impairment exists include but are not limited to a change in the competitive landscape, internal decisions to pursue new or different technology strategies, a loss of a significant customer or a significant change in the marketplace including prices paid for our products or the size of the market for our products. During fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, we determined that there were potential impairment indicators for certain intangible assets subject to amortization. As such, we performed the recoverability test described below for the relevant asset groups. In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the asset groups identified. In fiscal 2016, however, we determined that the undiscounted cash flows did not support

If
57

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


the carrying value of the asset groups identified and, accordingly, recorded impairment charges of $25.8 million, of which $18.7 million related to the write down of the SOLX intangible assets and the remaining $7.1 million related to intangible assets that were identified as part of the Company's global strategic review. Refer to Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for additional details regarding intangible asset impairments recorded.
When an impairment indicator exists, we test the intangible asset for recoverability. For purposes of the recoverability test, we group our amortizable intangible assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows if the intangible asset does not generate cash flows independent of other assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of the intangible asset (asset group) exceeds the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the intangible asset (asset group), we will write the carrying value down to the fair value in the period identified.

We generally calculate fair value of our intangible assets as the present value of estimated future cash flows we expect to generate from the asset using a risk-adjusted discount rate. In determining our estimated future cash flows associated with our intangible assets, we use estimates and assumptions about future revenue contributions, cost structures and remaining useful lives of the asset (asset group).

If we determine the estimate of an intangible asset's remaining useful life should be reduced based on our expected use of the asset, the remaining carrying amount of the asset is amortized prospectively over the revised estimated useful life.
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed
ASC Topic 985-20, Software, specifies that costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers, at which point capitalized costs are amortized over their estimated useful life.life of five to 10 years. Technological feasibility is established when we have a detailed design of the software and when research and development activities on the underlying device, if applicable, are completed. We capitalize costs associated with both software that we sell as a separate product and software that is embedded in a device.
We review the net realizable value of capitalized assets periodically to assess the recoverability of amounts capitalized. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded $6.0 million of impairment charges related to the discontinuance of certain capitalized software projects as a result of our global strategic review. In the future, the net realizable value may be adversely affected by the loss of a significant customer or a significant change in the market place, which could result in an impairment being recorded.
Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities represent items payable or expected to settle within the next twelve months. The items included in the fiscal year end balances were:
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
VAT liabilities$1,289
 $4,205
Forward contracts4,210
 2,657
Deferred revenue27,053
 22,362
Accrued taxes3,876
 3,819
All other30,180
 34,579
Total$66,608
 $67,622

4858

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities represent items that are not payable or expected to settle within the next twelve months.
The items included in the fiscal year end balances were:

(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
VAT Liabilities$5,121
 $6,875
Forward Contracts1,786
 1,185
Deferred Revenue23,737
 24,132
HS Core Liability (a)156
 3,654
All Other26,551
 21,053
Total$57,351
 $56,899
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Unfunded pension liability18,067
 17,402
Unrecognized tax benefit2,283
 3,992
All other5,756
 10,343
Total$26,106
 $31,737
(a)See Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, for details of the HS Core quality issue that occurred during the first quarter of 2012.
Research and Development Expenses
All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising Costs
All advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statementstatements of (loss) income. Advertising expenses were $4.6$3.9 million,, $4.5 $4.5 million,, and $2.8$3.6 million for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Freight is classified in cost of goods sold when the customer is charged for freight and in selling, general and administration when the customer is not explicitly charged for freight.
Income Taxes
The income tax provision is calculated for all jurisdictions in which we operate. ThisThe income tax provision process involves estimating actualcalculating current taxes due plusand assessing temporary differences arising from differing treatmentitems which are taxable or deductible in different periods for tax and accounting purposes thatand are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are periodically evaluated to determine their recoverabilityfor realizability and a valuation allowance is established with a corresponding additionalmaintained for the portion of our deferred tax assets that are not more-likely-than-not realizable.
We file income tax provision recordedreturns in our consolidated statements of income if their recovery is not considered more likely than not. The provision for income taxes could also be materially impacted if actual taxes due differ from our earlier estimates.

all jurisdictions in which we operate. We record a liability for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. Uncertain tax positions are unrecognized tax benefits for which reserves have been established. Our financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities’authorities' full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

We file incomerecord a liability for the portion of unrecognized tax returns in all jurisdictions inbenefits claimed which we operate. We establish reserves to provide for additional income taxes that may be due in future years as these previously filedhave determined are not more-likely-than-not realizable. These tax returns are audited. These reserves have been established based on management’smanagement's assessment as to the potential exposure attributable to permanent differencesour uncertain tax positions as well as interest and interest applicablepenalties attributable to both permanent and temporary differences.these uncertain tax positions. All tax reserves are analyzed periodicallyquarterly and adjustments are made as events occurwhen necessary. Tax reserves are reversed when the statute of limitations expires or the matter is considered effectively settled.
We evaluate at the end of each reporting period whether some or all of the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are permanently reinvested. We recognize deferred income tax liabilities to the extent that warrant modification.

management asserts that undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries are not permanently reinvested or will not be permanently reinvested in the future. Our position is based upon several factors including management’s evaluation of the Company and its subsidiaries’ financial requirements, the short term and long-term operational and fiscal objectives of the Company, and the tax consequences associated with the repatriation of earnings.
Derivative Instruments

We account for our derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) and ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) and with ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). In accordance with ASC 815, we

49

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for the change in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative as a hedging instrument for accounting purposes, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. In addition, ASC 815 provides that, for derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value are either (a) offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or (b) recognized in

59

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


equity until the hedged item is recognized in earnings, depending on whether the derivative is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash flows. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculation purposes.
TheWhen the underlying hedged transaction affects earnings, the gains or losses on the forward foreign exchange rate contracts designated as hedges are recorded in net revenues, cost of goods sold, operating expenses and other incomeexpense, net in our consolidated statements of (loss) income, whendepending on the nature of the underlying hedged transaction affects earnings.transactions. The cash flows related to the gains and losses are classified in the consolidated statements of cash flows as part of cash flows from operating activities. For those derivative instruments that are not designated as part of a hedging relationship we record the gains or losses in earnings currently. These gains and losses are intended to offset the gains and losses recorded on net monetary assets or liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies. We recorded foreign currency losses on designatedof $1.4 million, $1.1 million, and non-designated hedges of $0.8$0.5 million, $0.4 million, and $1.4 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

On a quarterly basis, we assess whether the cash flow hedges are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of the hedged item. We manage the credit risk of the counterparties by dealing only with institutions that we consider financially sound and consider the risk of non-performance to be remote.
Our derivative instruments do not subject our earnings or cash flows to material risk, as gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to offset losses and gains on the item being hedged. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes and we do not have any non-derivative instruments that are designated as hedging instruments pursuant to ASC Topic 815.
Stock-Based Compensation
We useexpense the Black-Scholes option-pricing modelfair value of stock-based awards granted to employees, board members and others, net of estimated forfeitures. To calculate the grant-date fair value of our stock options. The following assumptions, which involveoptions we use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and for performance share units and market stock units we use of judgment by management, are used in the computation of the grant-date fair value of our stock options:
Expected Volatility — We have principally used our historical volatility as a basis to estimate expected volatility in our valuation of stock options.
Expected Term — We estimate the expected term of our options using historical exercise and forfeiture data to determine the amount of stock based compensation to record each period. We believe that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of our new option grants.
Estimated Forfeiture Rate — Based on an analysis of our historical forfeitures, we have applied an annual forfeiture rate which represents the portion that we expect will be forfeited each year over the vesting period. We reevaluate this analysis periodically and adjust the forfeiture rate as necessary. Ultimately, we will only recognize expense for those shares that vest.Monte Carlo simulation models.
Valuation of Acquisitions
We allocate the amounts we pay for each acquisition to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition, including acquired identifiable intangible assets. We base the estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets on detailed valuations that use historical information and market assumptions based upon the assumptions of a market participant. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. The use of alternative valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, and alternative estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations and intangible asset amortization expense in current and future periods.
In certain acquisitions, we have earn-out arrangements or contingent consideration to provide potential future payments to the seller for achieving certain agreed-upon financial targets. We record the contingent consideration at its fair value at the acquisition date. Generally, we have entered into arrangements with contingent consideration that require payments in cash. As such, each quarter, we periodically revalue the contingent consideration obligations associated with certain acquisitions to their thencurrent fair value and record the change in the fair value as contingent consideration income or expense within selling, general and administrative expense. These changes are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense. Increases or decreases in the fair

50

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


value of the contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in assumed discount periods and rates, changes in the assumed timing and amount of revenue and expense estimates, and changes in assumed probability adjustments with respect to regulatory approval. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions, as well as changes in any of the assumptions described above, can materially impact the amount of contingent consideration income or expense we record in any given period.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Sales to one unaffiliated Japanese customer, the Japanese Red Cross Society, amounted to $90.1 million, $99.5 million,In fiscal 2016, 2015, and $95.9 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Accounts receivable balances attributable to this2014 no customer accounted for 9.0%, 15.3%, and 13.7%more than 10% of our consolidated accounts receivable at fiscal year ended 2013, 2012, and 2011. While the accounts receivable related to the Japanese Red Cross Society may be significant, we do not believe the credit loss risk to be significant given the consistent payment history by this customer.revenues.
Certain other markets and industries can expose us to concentrations of credit risk. For example, in our commercial plasma business, our sales are concentrated with several large customers. As a result, our accounts receivable extended to any one of these commercial plasmabio-pharmaceutical customers can be somewhat significant at any point in time. Also, a portion of our trade accounts receivable outside the United States include sales to government-owned or supported healthcare systems in several countries, which are subject to payment delays. Payment is dependent upon the financial stability and creditworthiness of those countries’ national economies. We have not incurred significant losses on government receivables. We continually evaluate all government receivables for potential collection risks associated with the availability of government funding and reimbursement practices. If the financial

60

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


condition of customers or the countries’ healthcare systems deteriorate such that their ability to make payments is uncertain, allowances may be required in future periods.

Deteriorating credit and economic conditions in parts of Western Europe, particularly in Italy, where our net accounts receivable was $23.4 million and $21.0 million for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, may increase the average length of time it takes us to collect accounts receivable in certain regions within these countries.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Standards Implemented
In February 2013,April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"(“ASU”) No. 2013-02,2014-08, Comprehensive IncomePresentation of Financial Statements (Topic 220)205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Amounts Reclassified OutDisposals of Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeComponents of an Entity. This Update requiresASU No. 2014-08 limits the requirement to report discontinued operations to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. The amendments also require expanded disclosures concerning discontinued operations and disclosures of certain financial results attributable to disclosea disposal of a significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. The amendments in ASU No. 2014-08 are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU No. 2014-08 beginning in the effectfirst quarter of significant reclassifications outfiscal 2016. The adoption of accumulated other comprehensive incomeASU No. 2014-08 did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU No. 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This guidance simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs but does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issue costs related to line of credit arrangements. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. ASU No. 2015-15 indicates that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to line of credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the respective line itemsof credit arrangement. ASU No. 2015-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. We early adopted ASU No. 2015-03 in net income if the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. Our debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount being reclassified is requiredof that debt liability. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-03 did not have a material impact our financial position or results of operations.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. ASU No. 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes on a classified balance sheet. Currently under U.S. GAAP, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are separated into current and non-current amounts in the balance sheet. ASU No. 2015-17 requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in the balance sheet. ASU No. 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We early adopted ASU No. 2015-17 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. ASU No. 2015-17 was adopted retrospectively and, as a result, the consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2015 was adjusted. The March 28, 2015 current deferred tax assets and liabilities of $12.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were reclassified as long-term. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-17 had an impact on the presentation of our consolidated balance sheet, but did not impact our financial position or results of operations.
Standards to be reclassifiedImplemented
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU No. 2014-09 stipulates that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in its entiretyan amount that reflects the consideration to net income. The objective ofwhich the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this disclosure iscore principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amended guidance isperformance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, and2017, including interim periods within those reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial disclosures.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscalreporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The adoptionimpact of adopting ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impactNo. 2014-09 on our financial position orand results of operations.operations is being assessed by management.

In December 2011,June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-112014-12, Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and LiabilitiesCompensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on our financial disclosures.
Standards Implemented
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Update No. 2011-05 updates the disclosure requirements for comprehensive income to include total comprehensive income,2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the

5161

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income eitherrequisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. The updated guidanceASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, as it relates to such awards. ASU No. 2014-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively. We adopted this standard in theour first quarter of fiscal 20132017 with early adoption permitted using either of two methods: (i) prospective to all awards granted or modified after the two separate but consecutiveeffective date; or (ii) retrospective to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements approach. Theand to all new or modified awards thereafter, with the cumulative effect of applying ASU No. 2014-12 as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU 2011-05 does not have an effect on our financial position or results of operations but changed our presentation of comprehensive income.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08,Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"), which changes the way a company completes its annual impairment review process. The provisions of this pronouncement provides an entity with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. ASU-2011-08 allows an entity the option to bypass the qualitative-assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The pronouncement does not change the current guidance for testing other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. This standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted these provisions in 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not2014-12 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
3.In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, ACQUISITIONSPresentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. ASU No. 2014-15 defines management's responsibility to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. This guidance will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016; however, early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Acquisitions were completed inIn August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12, fiscal 2013Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and fiscal 2011 as part of our growth initiatives. We did not complete any acquisitions during fiscal 2012Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient. Part I of ASU No. 2015-12 designates contract value as the only required measure for fully benefit-responsive investment contracts. Part II simplifies the investment disclosure requirements under Topics 820, 960, 962, and 965 for employee benefits plans and Part III provides a measurement date practical expedient for fiscal periods that do not coincide with a month-end date. ASU No. 2015-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2015-12 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Fiscal Year 2013 AcquisitionIn January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU No. 2016-01 requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value with changes recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. It also simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. ASU No. 2016-01 also requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset and liability. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of certain provisions is permitted. Management does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 is intended to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease asset and lease liabilities on the balance sheet, including those previously classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP, and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier adoption is permitted. The impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-02 on our financial position and results of operations is being assessed by management.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The purpose of ASU No. 2016-08 is to clarify the guidance on principal versus agent considerations. It includes indicators that help to determine whether an entity controls the specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer and to assist in determining when the entity satisfied the performance obligation and as such, whether to recognize a gross or a net amount of consideration in their consolidated statement of operations. The effective date and transition requirements are consistent with ASU No. 2014-09. The impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-08 on our financial position and results of operations is being assessed by management.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation- Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The purpose of the update is to simplify several areas of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal periods. Early adoption is permitted. The impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-09 on our financial position and results of operations is being assessed by management.

Whole Blood Acquisition
On August 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition from Pall Corporation (“Pall”) of substantially all of the assets relating to its blood collection, filtration, processing, storage, and re-infusion product lines, and all of the outstanding equity interest in Pall Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., a subsidiary of Pall based in Mexico pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Pall. We refer to the acquired business as the “whole blood business.”

At the closing of the transaction, we paid a total consideration of $535.2 million in cash and $0.5 million in shares following resolution of post-closing adjustments for working capital and historical earnings levels. We anticipate paying an additional $15.0 million upon replication and delivery of certain manufacturing assets of Pall's filter media business to Haemonetics by 2016. Until that time, Pall will manufacture and sell filter media to Haemonetics under a supply agreement.

We entered into a credit agreement on August 1, 2012 in connection with the transaction which includes a $475.0 million term loan to fund the majority of the cash paid to Pall. See Note 8 for a detailed description of the key terms and provisions of the credit agreement.
We acquired the whole blood business to provide access to the manual collection and whole blood markets and provide scope for introduction of automated solutions in those markets. The whole blood business manufactures and sells manual blood collection systems and filters and has operations in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific countries. Revenue from the sale of whole blood disposables has been reported within the blood center disposables product line since the date of acquisition.
The assets and liabilities acquired from Pall were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. During the current period, we updated the fair value of assets and liabilities recorded as of the date of acquisition with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill to reflect such updates to the allocation of purchase price. There were no significant changes to the consolidated statement of income during fiscal 2013 as a result of the changes to fair value.
The allocation of purchase price is preliminary, and subject to change based primarily on finalization of the assessment of the value of deferred taxes and assumed liabilities. We expect to complete these valuations by June 30, 2013.

5262

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The preliminary allocationguidance clarifies that entities are not required to assess whether promised goods or services are performance obligations if they are immaterial in the context of the purchase pricecontract. ASU No. 2016-10 also addresses how to the estimated fair value of the acquired assetsdetermine whether promised goods or services are separately identifiable and liabilities is summarizedpermits entities to make a policy election to treat shipping and handling costs as follows:
Asset class Amounts Recognized as of March 30, 2013 (Provisional)
(In thousands)  
Inventories $49,917
Property, plant and equipment 85,984
Intangible assets 188,500
Other assets/liabilities, net (6,166)
Goodwill 216,940
Fair value of net assets acquired $535,175
The adjusted fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities are reflectedfulfillment activities. In addition, it clarifies key provisions in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The provisional allocation of purchase price changed as compared to the initial allocation as of September 29, 2012 as follows: inventory was reduced by $2.5 million, property, plant and equipment increased $15.3 million, intangible assets decreased $18.3 million, assumed liabilities increased $4.4 million and goodwill increased by $9.9 million.
The $188.5 million of acquired intangible assets was allocated to acquired technology and customer relationships at fair values of $61.0 million and $127.5 million, respectively. The acquired assets are amortized over the estimate of their useful lives of 12 years on a straight-line basis. We adopted the straight-line amortization and shortened the useful lives to 12 years as it best reflects the pattern of benefits. We recorded $10.5 million in amortization expense relating to the acquired intangible assets for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013.
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets. Goodwill of $216.9 million represents future economic benefits expected to arise from work force at the various plants and locations and significant technological know-how in filter manufacturing. All of the domestic goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
Revenue for the whole blood business from acquisition was $138.4 million.

We recognized $3.2 million and $3.0 million of transaction costsTopic 606 related to the whole blood acquisition in the selling, generallicensing. The effective date and administrative line item in the accompanying consolidated statementstransition requirements are consistent with ASU No. 2014-09. The impact of income for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013adopting ASU No. 2016-10 on our financial position and March 31, 2012, respectively.results of operations is being assessed by management.
The following represents the pro forma consolidated statements of income as if the acquisition of the whole blood business had been included in our consolidated results beginning on April 3, 2011.
(In thousands) March 30, 2013 March 31, 2012
Net sales $963,923
 $963,643
Net income 56,540
 77,984
Basic earnings per share $1.10
 $1.54
Diluted earnings per share $1.08
 $1.51

The unaudited consolidated pro-forma financial information above includes the following significant adjustments made to account for certain costs which would have been incurred if the acquisition had been completed on April 3, 2011, as adjusted for the applicable tax impact. As our acquisition of the whole blood business was completed on August 1, 2012, the pro-forma adjustments for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 in the table below only include the required adjustments through August 1, 2012.

53

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(In thousands) March 30, 2013 March 31, 2012
Transaction costs (1) $3,184
 $3,000
Amortization of inventory fair value adjustment (2) 11,948
 (11,948)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets (3) (5,236) (15,708)
Interest expense incurred on acquisition financing (4) (3,173) (9,520)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (5) (3,513) (10,540)

(1)
Eliminated transactions costs as these non-recurring costs were incurred in fiscal 2013.
(2)
Added additional expense in the period ended March 31, 2012 to reflect the inventory fair value adjustments which would have been amortized had the transaction been consummated on April 3, 2011 as the corresponding inventory would have been completely sold during the first two quarters of 2011. Also, deducted the actual inventory fair value adjustment recorded in the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 to reflect the pro-forma consumption of inventory in 2011.
(3)Added additional amortization of the acquired whole blood intangible assets recognized at fair value in purchase accounting.
(4)Added additional interest expense for the debt used to finance the acquisition.
(5)Additional investments in infrastructure costs to replicate certain support functions performed by division or corporate organizations of Pall that did not transfer in the acquisition. These costs are primarily related to information technology infrastructure and application costs, and personnel costs required to expand regional and corporate administrative and sales support functions. These costs are not intended to be representative of actual costs incurred by Pall Corporation, and represent Haemonetics' best estimate of future incremental costs on an annualized basis.  Actual incremental investments may differ from these estimates.

Prior to the acquisition, we had purchased filters from the whole blood business for inclusion in some of our devices. The transactional value between both parties approximated $10.0 million which was recorded by Pall as revenue and by us as a cost of sale. At the acquisition date, we owed Pall $1.4 million which has been settled as of March 30, 2013.
Fiscal Year 2011 Acquisition
ACCS Acquisition
On December 28, 2010, Haemonetics acquired certain assets of Applied Critical Care Services, Inc. (ACCS) for $6.4 million. ACCS was a manufacturer’s representative for Haemonetics engaged in the selling and servicing of the TEG analyzer product line. The purchase price was allocated to customer relationships of $4.5 million, other liabilities of $0.8 million, and goodwill of $2.7 million. Pro forma information is not provided as it is immaterial.

4.3. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
We generally provide a warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of each device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We estimate our potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience, and we periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual and make adjustments as necessary.
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period$796
 $1,273
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the year$531
 $590
Warranty provision1,180
 2,430
948
 1,199
Warranty spending(1,303) (2,907)(1,059) (1,258)
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period$673
 $796
Warranty accrual as of the end of the year$420
 $531
5.4. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined onwith the first-in, first-out method.

54
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Raw materials$62,062
 $71,794
Work-in-process13,180
 12,462
Finished goods111,786
 126,821
Total Inventories$187,028
 $211,077
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we recorded $9.4 million of inventory charges and reserves, of which $5.3 million resulted from changes in demand for Blood Center products.
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill Impairment Testing and Charges

Under ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, goodwill and intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Instead these assets are evaluated for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis between annual tests when events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. We perform our annual impairment test on the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter for each of our reporting units. Our reporting units for purposes of assessing goodwill impairment are the same as our operating segments, which are organized primarily based on geography and include: (a) North America Plasma, (b) Americas Blood Center and Hospital, (c) EMEA, (d) Asia-Pacific and (e) Japan. The North America Plasma reporting unit is a separate operating segment with dedicated segment management due the size and scale of the plasma business.

During the third quarter of each fiscal year, we prepare our long term projections for net revenues, income and operating cash flows. The economic weakness in EMEA and declines in our U.S. blood center collections have negatively impacted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") and net revenues for our EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units. Because of these market conditions and key uncertainties, including the market rate of adoption of our new products and the negative impact of intense competitive pressure on pricing and market share, we lowered our expectations in terms of the timing and amount of our future revenue, income and cash flows. As a result, we concluded in the

63

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
Raw materials$70,716
 $41,219
Work-in-process7,829
 4,640
Finished goods105,239
 71,304
 $183,784
 $117,163
third quarter of fiscal 2016 that indicators of potential goodwill impairment were present for the EMEA and Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting units, therefore requiring an interim test for goodwill impairment.
6.GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with ASC Topic 350, we prepared a “Step 1” Test that compared the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. We utilized a discounted cash flow approach in order to value our reporting units for the Step 1 Test, which required that we forecast future cash flows of the reporting units and discount the cash flow stream based upon a weighted average cost of capital that was derived, in part, from comparable companies within similar industries. The discounted cash flow calculations also included a terminal value calculation that was based upon an expected long-term growth rate for the applicable reporting unit. We believe that our procedures for estimating discounted future cash flows, including the terminal valuation, were reasonable and consistent with market conditions at the time of estimation. We corroborated the valuations that arose from the discounted cash flow approach by performing both a market multiple valuation and by reconciling the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our market capitalization at the time of the test.

The results of the Step 1 Test performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 indicated that the estimated fair value of all of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values, with the exception of EMEA, for which we recorded an estimated goodwill impairment charge, as discussed below. Based on this Step 1 analysis, the reporting unit that is most at risk of impairment in future periods is the Americas Blood Center and Hospital, which has an excess fair value over carrying value of approximately 25.8% and has allocated goodwill of $175.9 million. We believe that our assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Americas Blood Center and Hospital reporting unit were reasonable. If different assumptions were to be used, particularly with respect to estimating future cash flows, or if actual operating results and cash flows of the Americas Blood Center and Hospital differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows, there is the potential that an impairment charge could result in future periods. Additionally, changes to the discount rate or the long-term growth rate could also give rise to an impairment in future periods.

As a result of the carrying value of the EMEA reporting unit exceeding its estimated fair value, a "Step 2" Test was required for this reporting unit. The Step 2 Test measures the impairment loss by allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in Step 1, to the reporting units’ assets and liabilities, with the residual amount representing the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized.
The Step 2 Test under ASC Topic 350 requires us to perform a theoretical purchase price allocation for the EMEA reporting unit to determine the implied fair value of goodwill as of the evaluation date. We finalized the Step 2 Test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 and concluded no adjustment to the estimated $66.3 million impairment loss recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 was required, as there was significant intangible value attributed to customer relationships and developed technology based on the theoretical purchase price allocation. The impairment charge recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2016 represented the entire goodwill balance allocated to EMEA. This charge does not impact our liquidity, cash flows from operations, future operations, or compliance with debt covenants.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment for fiscal 20132016 and 20122015 are as follows:
(In thousands) 
Carrying amount as of April 2, 2011$115,367
Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates(309)
Carrying amount as of March 31, 2012$115,058
Whole blood business (a)216,940
Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates(1,524)
Carrying amount as of March 30, 2013$330,474
(In thousands)Japan EMEA North America Plasma All Other Total
Carrying amount as of March 29, 2014$25,477
 $74,019
 $26,415
 $210,857
 $336,768
Currency translation(578) (1,324) 
 (556) (2,458)
Carrying amount as of March 28, 2015$24,899
 $72,695
 $26,415
 $210,301
 $334,310
Impairment charge
 (66,305) 
 
 (66,305)
Transfer of goodwill between segments
 (6,390) 
 6,390
 
Currency translation(16) 
 
 (149) (165)
Carrying amount as of April 2, 2016$24,883
 $
 $26,415
 $216,542
 $267,840

(a)
See Note 3, Acquisitions, for a full description of the acquisition of the whole blood assets, which occurred on August 1, 2012.

Intangible AssetsAsset Impairment
In April 2013, we acquired a patented red cell storage solution, referred to as SOLX, from Hemerus Medical, LLC for cash consideration of $24.1 million plus an agreement to make certain future payments accounted for as contingent consideration. We acquired Hemerus to complement the portfolio of whole blood collection, filtration and processing product lines and to bring greater efficiency and productivity to whole blood collection and processing.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2016, we received U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance for the SOLX solution with a Haemonetics whole blood filter. At that time, the vast majority of the U.S. market utilized a red cell filter, not a whole blood

64

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


filter, for whole blood collection procedures as they seek to optimize blood component yield from each collection. To bring SOLX to market with a red cell filter would have required substantial additional investment. Accordingly, we conducted a final market review prior to proceeding with this investment, which indicated customers would not pay a price for a SOLX collection kit sufficient to recover the cost to produce it, or to provide an adequate return on the additional investment. As result, in fiscal 2016, we suspended further investment in the SOLX technology and recorded an impairment charge of $18.7 million to write down the carrying value of the SOLX intangible assets. In addition, we reversed the $4.9 million of contingent consideration liability we had recorded, as we do not expect to achieve the conditions that called for its payment.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed our global strategic review which resulted in the identification of certain intangible assets that were at risk of being impaired due to changes in the strategic direction of the Company. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we performed impairment tests for each of these asset groups and based on revised expectations, we recorded asset impairment charges of $7.1 million. Of the total $25.8 million of intangible asset impairments recorded during fiscal 2016, $6.6 million is recorded within cost of goods sold, while the remaining $19.2 million is included within impairment of assets on the consolidated statements of (loss) income. Of these intangible impairments, $6.6 million related to EMEA and the remaining $19.2 million related to our All Other operating segment.
The gross carrying amount of intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization as of April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization(1)
 Net 
Weighted Average
Useful Life
       (In years)
As of April 2, 2016 
  
    
Amortizable:       
Patents$8,545
 $7,542
 $1,003
 9
Capitalized software40,488
 14,791
 25,697
 6
Other developed technology126,142
 73,475
 52,667
 12
Customer contracts and related relationships196,085
 89,804
 106,281
 10
Trade names7,083
 5,204
 1,879
 11
Total$378,343
 $190,816
 $187,527
 10
Non-amortizable:       
In-process software development$14,427
      
In-process patents2,504
      
Total$16,931
      
(1)Includes impairment of SOLX and other intangible assets, as discussed below.
(In thousands)
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 
Weighted Average
Useful Life
       (In years)
As of March 28, 2015��
  
    
Amortizable:       
Patents$7,686
 $7,373
 $313
 9
Capitalized software31,818
 5,654
 26,164
 7
Other developed technology124,573
 46,474
 78,099
 12
Customer contracts and related relationships195,985
 70,440
 125,545
 10
Trade names7,042
 3,234
 3,808
 11
Total$367,104
 $133,175
 $233,929
 10
Non-amortizable:       
In-process software development$7,872
      
In-process patents2,787
      
Total$10,659
      

65

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Intangible assets include the value assigned to license rights and other developed technology, patents, customer contracts and relationships and a trade name.names. The estimated useful lives for all of these intangible assets are 2 to 19 years.
Aggregate amortization expense for amortized intangible assets for fiscal year 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $22.1 million, $11.4 million, and $11.1 million, respectively. Future annual amortization expense on intangible assets is expected to approximate $26.2 million for fiscal year 2014, $24.9 million for fiscal year 2015, $24.6 million for fiscal year 2016, $24.5 million for fiscal year 2017 and $23.7 million for fiscal year 2018.
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 
Weighted Average
Useful Life
 (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In years)
As of March 30, 2013 
  
    
Patents$8,706
 $6,397
 $2,309
 10
Capitalized software26,841
 2,333
 24,508
 6
Other developed technology99,486
 24,843
 74,643
 12
Customer contracts and related relationships196,365
 36,552
 159,813
 12
Trade names5,383
 2,268
 3,115
 10
Total intangibles$336,781
 $72,393
 $264,388
 11
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 
Weighted Average
Useful Life
 (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In years)
As of March 31, 2012 
  
    
Patents$13,463
 $7,843
 $5,620
 11
Capitalized software20,597
 1,394
 19,203
 6
Other developed technology42,693
 20,120
 22,573
 11
Customer contracts and related relationships69,361
 23,639
 45,722
 12
Trade names5,408
 1,977
 3,431
 10
Total intangibles$151,522
 $54,973
 $96,549
 11


55

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The changes to the net carrying value of our intangible assets from March 31, 201228, 2015 to March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 reflect acquisitionthe impact of the whole bloodSOLX impairment discussed above as well as the additional intangible assets, amortization expense and the effect of exchange rate changes in the translation of our intangible assets held by our international subsidiaries. Also contributing to the change was an asset write-offimpairments recorded induring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 associated with exiting activities2016 totaling $7.1 million, as discussed above. Of the $7.1 million of impairments recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, approximately $6.0 million was related to technologies originally acquired from Arryx, Inc. The total asset write-off related to abandoning Arryx-related assets was $4.2 million, net of $0.9 million of proceeds from the salediscontinuance of certain intellectual property.capitalized software projects as discussed in Note 16, Capitalization of Software Development Costs. Amortization expense, partially offset by the investment in capitalized software and other less significant intangible assets, also contributed to the change in net carrying value.
Aggregate amortization expense for amortized intangible assets for fiscal 2016 was $59.3 million, which included $25.4 million of amortization expense as a result of the intangible asset impairments discussed above. Fiscal 2015 and 2014 amortization expense was $33.5 million and $29.2 million, respectively. Future annual amortization expense on intangible assets is estimated to be as follows:
Fiscal Year 
Amount   (in thousands)
2017 $31,397
2018 $30,959
2019 $29,250
2020 $27,353
2021 $25,512
7.6. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. For the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, approximately 49.0%42.9% of our sales were generated outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency.
Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. Dollar, our reporting currency. We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to a lesser extent the Swiss Franc, Australian Dollar, British Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar and the Mexican Peso. This does not eliminate the impact of the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-yearone-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.
Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015 were cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in Other Comprehensive Income in the Statement of Stockholders’ Equityother comprehensive (loss) income until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. We had designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $107.4 million as of April 2, 2016 and $133.3145.8 million as of March 30, 2013 and $162.1 million as of March 31, 201228, 2015.
During fiscal 20132016, we recognized net gains of $2.5$8.8 million in earnings on our cash flow hedges, compared to recognized net lossesgains of $6.5 million and $8.6 million during $3.2 millionfiscal 2015 and $0.8 million during fiscal 2012 and 20112014, respectively. For the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, $5.1a $3.9 million of gains, loss, net of tax, werewas recorded in Other Comprehensive Incomeaccumulated other comprehensive (loss) income to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, as compared to net gainsa gain of $3.112.2 million, net of tax, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 201228, 2015 and net lossesa gain of $4.13.7 million, net of tax, for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011March 29, 2014. At March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, gainslosses of $5.1$3.9 million,, net of tax, maywill be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 mature within twelve months.
Non-designated
66

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Non-Designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of offsetting transactions and balances. We use foreign currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These foreign currency forward contracts are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one month. They are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under ASC Topic 815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under ASC Topic 815 outstanding in the contract amount of $48.8 million as of $65.6April 2, 2016 and $52.6 million as of March 30, 2013 and $45.5 million as of March 31, 201228, 2015.
Interest Rate Swaps

On August 1, 2012, we entered into a Credit Agreementcredit agreement, as amended June 30, 2014, which provided for a $475.0 millionterm loan (“Term Loan”("Credit Agreement"). Under the terms of this Credit Agreement, the Companywe may borrow at a spread to an index, including the LIBOR index of 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, etc. From the date of the Credit Agreement, the Company haswe have chosen to borrow against the 1-month USD-LIBOR-BBA rounded up, if necessary, to the nearest1/16th of 1% (“Adjusted LIBOR”). The terms of the Credit

56

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Agreement also allow us to borrow in multiple tranches. While we currently borrow in a single tranche, in the future, we may choose to borrow in multiple tranches.

Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to interest rate risk from changes in Adjusted LIBOR. Part of our interest rate risk management strategy includes the use of interest rate swaps to mitigate our exposure to changes in variable interest rates. Our objective in using interest rate swaps is to add stability to interest expense and to manage and reduce the risk inherent in interest rate fluctuations. We formally document our hedge relationships (including identifying the hedged instrument and hedged item) at hedge inception to ensure that our interest rate swaps qualify for hedge accounting. On a quarterly basis, we assess whether the interest rate swaps are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of the hedged item. We do not hold or issue interest rate swaps for trading purposes. We manage the credit risk of the counterparties by dealing only with institutions that we consider financially sound and consider the risk of non-performance to be remote.
On December 21, 2012, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements ("the swaps"(the "Swaps"), whereby we receive Adjusted LIBOR and pay an average fixed rate of 0.68% on a total notional value of $250.0 million of debt. The interest rate swapsSwaps mature on August 1, 2017. The CompanyWe designated the interest rate swapsSwaps as a cash flow hedgehedges of variable interest rate risk associated with $250.0 million of indebtedness. For the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, $0.8 million of losses, net of tax, wereApril 2, 2016, an insignificant gain was recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of interest rate swapsthe Swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges. At For fiscal years ended March 30, 2013, losses28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, a loss of $0.9 million and a gain of $1.3 million, respectively, net of tax, were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income for this effective portion.$0.1 million may be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months.

67

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated statements of (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016.
Derivative Instruments
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss) Recognized
in OCI
(Effective Portion)
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified
from OCI into
Earnings
(Effective Portion)
 Location in
Statement of Operations
 
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing (*)
 
Location in
Statement of
Operations
 Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income Amount of Gain Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income into Earnings Location in Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income and Comprehensive (Loss) Income 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing (*)
 Location in Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income and Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(In thousands)                  
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts, net of tax $5,104
 $2,746
 Net revenues, COGS, and SG&A $(337) Other income (expense), net $(3,940) $8,822
 Net revenues, COGS, and SG&A $102
 Other expense, net
Non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts 
 
   $1,214
 Other income (expense) 
 
   $(203) Other expense, net
Designated interest rate swaps, net of tax $(779) $(269) Interest income (expense), net $
  $2
 $
 Other expense, net $
 
(*) We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our effectiveness testing.
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 or March 31, 201228, 2015. AmountsAs of April 2, 2016, the amount recognized as a deferred tax benefits in fiscal 2013asset for designated foreign currency and interest rate swap hedges were $1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively.was $0.3 million.
ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, current interest rate curves, interest rate volatilities, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, we have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy prescribed by ASC Topic 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our consolidated balance sheets as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 by type of contract and whether it is a qualifying hedge under ASC Topic 815.sheets:

57
(In thousands)
Location in
Balance Sheet
 Balance as of April 2, 2016 Balance as of March 28, 2015
Derivative Assets:   
  
Designated foreign currency hedge contractsOther current assets $427
 $9,740
Designated interest rate swapsOther current assets 
 
   $427
 $9,740
Derivative Liabilities:   
  
Designated foreign currency hedge contractsOther current liabilities $4,056
 $2,499
Designated interest rate swapsOther current liabilities 154
 159
   $4,210
 $2,658

68

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


(In thousands)
Location in
Balance Sheet
 Balance as of March 30, 2013 Balance as of March 31, 2012
Derivative Assets:   
  
Designated foreign currency hedge contractsOther current assets $7,030
 $6,186
   $7,030
 $6,186
Derivative Liabilities:   
  
Designated foreign currency hedge contractsOther current liabilities $954
 $1,185
Designated interest rate swapsOther current liabilities 671
 
   $1,625
 $1,185
For the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts were not significant and are not disclosed separately in the above table.
Other Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, we applied the requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, including our money market funds, foreign currency hedge contracts, and contingent consideration. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.
Our money market funds carried at fair value are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of following:March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012:
As of April 2, 2016Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
(In thousands)       
Assets 
  
  
  
Money market funds$72,491
 $
 $
 $72,491
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts
 427
 
 427
 $72,491
 $427
 $
 $72,918
Liabilities 
  
  
  
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts$
 $4,056
 $
 $4,056
Designated interest rate swaps
 154
 
 154
Contingent consideration
 
 
 
 $
 $4,210
 $
 $4,210

5869

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


As of March 30, 2013
Quoted Market Prices for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
 (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands)
Assets 
  
  
  
Money market funds$141,120
 $
 $
 $141,120
Foreign currency hedge contracts
 7,030
 
 7,030
 $141,120
 $7,030
 $
 $148,150
Liabilities 
  
  
  
Foreign currency hedge contracts$
 $954
 $
 $954
Interest rate swap
 671
 
 671
 $
 $1,625
 $
 $1,625

As of March 31, 2012
Quoted Market Prices for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
(In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands)
As of March 28, 2015Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
(In thousands)       
Assets 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Money market funds$194,574
 $
 $
 $194,574
$119,946
 $
 $
 $119,946
Forward currency hedge contracts
 6,186
 
 6,186
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts
 9,740
 
 9,740
$194,574
 $6,186
 $
 $200,760
$119,946
 $9,740
 $
 $129,686
Liabilities 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Forward currency hedge contracts$
 $1,185
 $
 $1,185
$
 $2,499
 $
 $2,499
Designated interest rate swaps
 159
 
 159
Contingent consideration
 
 4,727
 4,727
$
 $1,185
 $
 $1,185
$
 $2,658
 $4,727
 $7,385
For the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts were not significant and are not disclosed separately in the above tables.
ReleaseContingent consideration
Contingent consideration liabilities are measured at fair value using projected revenues, discount rates, probabilities of Neoteric Contingent Consideration
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, we establishedpayment and projected payment dates. This Level 3 fair value measurement was performed using a liability for payments to former shareholders of Neoteric which were contingent on the performance of the Blood Track businessprobability-weighted discounted cash flow over a ten year period. Increases or decreases in the first three years post-acquisition, beginning with fiscal 2010. We have reviewed the expected performance versus the performance thresholds for payment. Because the expected performance thresholds will not be achieved, we recorded an adjustment to the fair value of our contingent consideration liability can result from changes in discount periods and rates, as well as changes in the timing and amount of revenue estimates or likelihood of earning revenue. Projected revenues are based on our most recent internal operational budgets.
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liabilities for the year ended April 2, 2016.
(In thousands) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Balance at March 28, 2015 $4,727
Fair value adjustment (4,727)
Balance at April 2, 2016 $
As discussed in Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, during fiscal 2016, we reversed the remaining $4.9 million of contingent consideration liability associated with the SOLX asset, as we do not expect to achieve the conditions that called for its payment. This reversal, as well as the fair value adjustment recorded earlier in fiscal 2016, are included within the contingent consideration liability. This appears as contingent consideration income of $1.6 million in(income) expense line on the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.
In September 2011, we entered into an agreement to release the Company from the contingent consideration due to the former shareholders of Neoteric. Under the terms of the agreement, the former shareholders of Neoteric received $0.7 million in exchange for releasing the Company from any future claims for contingent consideration. The Company paid the $0.7 million settlement amount during September 2011 and has recorded the associated expense in the selling, general and administrative line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.2016.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The Term Loan (which is carried at amortized cost andcost), accounts receivable and accounts payable are also reported at their cost which approximatesapproximate fair value. Details pertaining to the Term Loan can be found in Note 7, Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt.

5970

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


8.7. NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following:
(In thousands)March 30, 2013 March 31, 2012April 2, 2016 March 28, 2015
Term loan, net of financing fees$471,016
 $
$406,175
 $426,814
Real estate mortgage2,877
 3,771

 851
Bank loan6,201
 
Bank loans and other borrowings1,825
 226
Less current portion(23,150) (894)(43,471) (21,522)
Long term debt$456,944
 $2,877
Long-term debt$364,529
 $406,369

On August 1, 2012 in connection with the acquisition of the whole blood business,, we entered into a credit agreement ("Credit Agreement") with the banks listed belowcertain lenders (together, “Lenders”) which provided for a $475.0$475.0 million term loan and a $50.0 million revolving loan (the “Revolving Credit Facility,”Facility”), and together with the Term Loan, (the “Credit Facilities”). The Credit Facilities havehad a term of five years and maturematured on August 1, 2017.

Under the terms of this Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow at a spread to an index, including the LIBOR index of 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, etc. From the date of the Credit Agreement, the Company has chosen to borrow against the 1-month USD-LIBOR-BBA rounded up, if necessary, to the nearest 1/16th of 1%. The terms of the Credit Agreement also allow the Company to borrow in multiple tranches. While theThe Company currently borrows in a single tranche, in the future, it may choose to borrow in multiplefour tranches.

At closing, we borrowed the Term Loan and used the proceeds to pay PallInterest for the acquisition of the assets described in Note 3. The $475.0 million Term Loan bears interest at variable rates determined byCredit Facilities was based on Adjusted LIBOR plus a range of 1.125% to 1.500% depending on the achievement of certain leverage ratios. The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates similar to the Term Loan. The current margin of the Term Loan is 1.375% over Adjusted LIBORratios and our effective interest rate inclusive of prepaid financing costscustomary credit terms which included financial and other fees was 2.00% as of March 30, 2013.

negative covenants. Revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed to fund our working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes. No amounts were outstanding underThe current margin of the Revolving Credit Facility at March 30, 2013.Term Loan is 1.375% over Adjusted LIBOR and our effective interest rate inclusive of prepaid financing costs and other fees was approximately 1.9% as of April 2, 2016. The Term Loan or portions thereof may be prepaid at any time, or from time to time without penalty. Once repaid, such amount may not be re-borrowed. The

On June 30, 2014, we modified our existing Credit Facilities by extending the maturity date to July 1, 2019, extending the principal amountrepayments of the Term Loan, and modifying certain restrictive covenants to allow greater operational flexibility and enhanced near term loan is repayable quarterly overliquidity. In addition, the amended Credit Agreement provides for a $100.0 million Revolving Credit Facility and establishes interest rates in the range of five yearsLIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500% depending on certain conditions. At April 2, 2016, $358.1 million was outstanding under the Term Loan and amortizes$50.0 million was outstanding on the Revolving Credit Facility, both with an interest rate of 1.875%. No additional amounts were borrowed as follows:a result of this modification. The fair value of debt approximates its current value of approximately $408.1 million as of April 2, 2016.
Fiscal YearTerm Loan Amortization Schedule
 (In thousands)
2014$17,813
2015$47,500
2016$71,250
2017$190,000
2018$148,438

Under the Credit Facilities, we are required to maintain a Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio not to exceed 3.0:1.0 and a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio not to be less than 4.0:1.0 during periods when the Credit Facilities are outstanding. In addition, we are required to satisfy these covenants, on a pro forma basis, in connection with any new borrowings (including any letter of credit issuances) on the Revolving Credit Facility as of the time of such borrowings. The Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is calculated as the Consolidated EBITDA divided by Consolidated Interest Expense while the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio is calculated as Consolidated Total Debt divided by Consolidated EBITDA. Consolidated EBITDA includes EBITDA adjusted by non-recurring and unusual transactions specifically as defined in the Credit Facilities.

The Credit Facilities also contain usual and customary non-financial affirmative and negative covenants which include certain restrictions with respect to subsequent indebtedness, liens, loans and investments (including acquisitions), financial reporting

60

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


obligations, mergers, consolidations, dissolutions or liquidation, asset sales, affiliate transactions, change of our business, capital expenditures, share repurchase and other restricted payments. These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications set forth in the Credit Agreement.

Any failure to comply with the financial and operating covenants of the Credit Facilities would prevent us from being able to borrow additional funds and would constitute a default, which could result in, among other things, the amounts outstanding including all accrued interest and unpaid fees, becoming immediately due and payable. In addition, the Credit Facilities include customary events of default, in certain cases subject to customary cure periods. As of March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, we were in compliance with the covenants. The goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges discussed in Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,

71

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


and the property, plant and equipment impairment charges discussed in Note 12, Property Plant and Equipment, are excluded from the definition of Consolidated EBITDA in the Credit Agreement.

Commitment fee

Pursuant to the Credit Agreement we are required to pay the Lenders, on the last day of each calendar quarter, a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. The commitment fee is subject to a pricing grid based on our Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio. The commitment fee ranges from 0.175% to 0.300%. The current commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the Revolving Credit Facility is 0.250%.

We may elect to increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility from $50.0 million to $100.0 million. Alternatively, we may elect to enter into additional term loans up to a $100.0 million combined limit with the Revolving Credit Facility. These elections are subject to the approval of the Administrative Agent and the identification of additional Lenders or current Lenders willing to increase their loan amounts per the terms and conditions contained in the Credit Agreement.

Debt issuance costs and interest

Expenses associated with the issuance of the Term Loan were capitalized and are amortized to interest expense over the five yearslife of the term loan using the effective interest method. In connection withAs of April 2, 2016, the Term Loan, we recorded deferred financing costs$408.1 million term loan balance was netted down by the $1.9 million of $5.5 million, of which $4.0 million remains as aremaining debt discount. The debt discount, is netted against the $475.0 million Term Loan, resulting in a net note payable of $471.0 million. The debt discount will also be amortized over the life of the notes.$406.2 million.

Interest expense was $5.9$8.5 million and $0.4 million for both the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 2012,28, 2015, respectively. Accrued interest associated with our outstanding debt is included as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, accrued interest totaled $0.1 million.$0.1 million.

Parties to the credit facilities
The Lenders party to the Credit Agreement are JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. as Syndication Agent, J P Morgan Securities LLC and Citibank, N.A. as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners, Bank of America, N.A., RBS Citizens, N.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, TD Bank, N.A. and US Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents, Union Bank, N.A., PNC Bank, National Association and Sovereign Bank, N.A. as Senior Managing Agents and the syndicate lenders that are parties thereto.

Other Credit Facilities

The otherOther debt as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 includes the real estate mortgage loan of $2.9 million and short term bank borrowings of $6.2$1.8 million under operating lines of credit.
In December 2000, we entered into a $10.0 million real estate mortgage agreement (the “Mortgage Agreement”) with an investment firm. The Mortgage Agreement requiresrequired principal and interest payments of $0.1 million per month for a period of 180 months, commencing February 1, 2001. The entire balance of the loan may be repaid at any time after February 1, 2006, subject to a prepayment premium, which is calculated based upon the change in the current weekly average yield of Ten (10)-year U.S. Treasury Constant Maturities, the principal balance due and the remaining loan term. TheThis Mortgage Agreement provides for interest to accrue on the unpaid principal balance at a ratewas repaid in full during fiscal 2016.

Maturity Profile

The maturity profile of 8.41% per annum. Borrowings under the Mortgage Agreement, with a carrying valueall gross long-term debt, exclusive of approximately $2.9 million and $3.8 milliondebt discounts, as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and is presented below:March 31, 2012, respectively, are secured by the land, building and building improvements at our headquarters and manufacturing facility in the U.S.. There are no financial covenants in the terms and conditions of this agreement.
Fiscal year (in thousands)
 Credit Facilities Bank loans and other borrowings Total
2017 $42,683
 $154
 $42,837
2018 45,054
 108
 45,162
2019 151,763
 89
 151,852
2020 168,564
 50
 168,614
  $408,064
 $401
 $408,465

There are short term borrowings of $5.6 million in Japan resulting from fluctuation in their working capital.


6172

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Maturity Profile
The maturity profile of long-term debt as of March 30, 2013, after deducting prepaid financing costs is presented below.
Fiscal Year Ending 
(In thousands) 
2014$23,150
201547,553
201671,416
2017189,556
2018148,419
 $480,094
9.8. INCOME TAXES
Domestic and foreign income before provision for income tax is as follows:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Domestic$17,360
 $40,666
 $58,040
$(18,526) $(17,265) $(6,859)
Foreign32,537
 48,832
 52,041
(34,890) 48,430
 43,260
Total$49,897
 $89,498
 $110,081
$(53,416) $31,165
 $36,401
The income tax provision from continuing operations contains the following components:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Current 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal$3,795
 $8,505
 $14,982
$12
 $3,526
 $(4,896)
State1,324
 2,275
 2,111
(660) 898
 873
Foreign5,389
 5,954
 7,226
3,842
 5,614
 5,478
Total current$10,508
 $16,734
 $24,319
$3,194
 $10,038
 $1,455
Deferred 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal1,644
 7,522
 4,931
3,532
 1,227
 (1,785)
State(229) (597) 438
319
 3,215
 207
Foreign(826) (1,047) 413
(4,882) (212) 1,376
Total deferred$589
 $5,878
 $5,782
$(1,031) $4,230
 $(202)
Total$11,097
 $22,612
 $30,101
$2,163
 $14,268
 $1,253
IncludedOur subsidiary in Puerto Rico has been granted a fifteen year tax grant which expires in 2027. Our qualification for the tax grant is dependent on the continuation of our manufacturing activities in Puerto Rico. We benefit from a reduced tax rate on our earnings in Puerto Rico under the tax grant.
Our subsidiary in Switzerland operates as a principal company for direct federal tax purposes. Operating under this structure affords our Swiss subsidiary a reduced tax rate in Switzerland. Our Swiss subsidiary also operates under a 10 year tax holiday set to expire in 2018.
In fiscal 2016, we recorded a $7.1 million benefit to income tax provisions for fiscal 2013, 2012taxes relating to the impairment of goodwill and 2011 are approximately $1.6 million, $2.2 million and $10.8 million, respectively, provided on foreign source income of approximately $4.5 million, $6.2 million and $31.0 million for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for taxes which are payable in the United States.certain intangible assets.
Tax affected, significant temporary differences comprising the net deferred tax liability are as follows:

6273

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Tax affected, significant temporary differences comprising the net deferred tax liability are as follows:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Depreciation$(25,186) $(17,208)$1,749
 $609
Amortization(14,776) (19,249)
Amortization of intangibles4,417
 727
Inventory7,884
 4,224
7,607
 6,193
Hedging(162) (589)382
 84
Accruals and reserves7,208
 6,352
Accruals, reserves and other deferred tax assets12,590
 17,526
Net operating loss carry-forward1,877
 3,354
13,484
 5,392
Stock based compensation7,834
 8,649
9,622
 10,652
Tax credit carry-forward, net2,243
 2,328
16,191
 8,678
Gross deferred taxes$(13,078) $(12,139)
Gross deferred tax assets66,042
 49,861
Less valuation allowance(1,009) (1,569)(24,297) (16,027)
Net deferred tax liability$(14,087) $(13,708)
Total deferred tax assets (after valuation allowance)41,745
 33,834
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation(28,972) (24,342)
Amortization of goodwill and intangibles(23,626) (24,764)
Unremitted earnings(700) 
Other deferred tax liabilities(2,769) (1,604)
Total deferred tax liabilities(56,067) (50,710)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(14,322) $(16,876)

The valuation allowance increased by $8.3 million during 2016, primarily as the result of current year net operating losses and tax credits generated in domestic and foreign jurisdictions in which we have concluded that our deferred tax assets are not more-likely-than-not realizable. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we have assessed the available means of recovering deferred tax assets, including the ability to carryback net operating losses, the existence of reversing temporary differences, the availability of tax planning strategies and available sources of future taxable income. We have also considered the ability to implement certain strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented to accelerate taxable income and use expiring deferred tax assets. We believe we are able to support the deferred tax assets recognized as of the end of the year based on all of the available evidence. The worldwide net deferred tax liability as of April 2, 2016 includes deferred tax liabilities related to amortizable tax basis in goodwill, which are indefinite lived and are not considered to be a source of taxable income. As of March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, we maintain a valuation allowance against the portion of our U.S. net deferred tax assets that are not more-likely-than-not realizable and a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets of certain foreign subsidiaries.

At April 2, 2016, we have approximately $1.9 million in U.S. acquisition and $0.6 million in foreign relatedfederal net operating loss carry forwardscarry-forwards of approximately $29.2 million, U.S. state net operating loss carry-forwards of $33.1 million, federal tax credit carry-forwards of $13.7 million and state tax credit carry-forwards of $3.8 million that it believes are more likely thanavailable to reduce future taxable income. A portion of the federal net operating losses are subject to an annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations set forth under Internal Revenue Code Sections 382. Certain of the aforementioned amounts have not thatbeen recognized because they relate to excess stock based compensation. At April 2, 2016, $4.0 million of the federal net operating loss carry-forwards, $5.3 million of the state net operating loss carry-forwards, none of the federal tax credit carry-forwards and none of the state tax credit carry-forwards relate to excess stock based compensation tax deductions for which the benefit will be realized. We also have $2.6 millionrecorded to additional paid-in capital when recognized. The federal and state net operating losses begin to expire in gross2022 and 2019, respectively. The federal and state tax credits availablebegin to offset future tax. Weexpire in 2023 and 2025, respectively.

As of April 2, 2016, we have established valuation allowances to reduce the value of tax assets to amounts that it deems to be realizable. The valuation allowance is made up of $0.4 million acquisition related R&D credits and $0.6 million acquisition relatedforeign net operating losses for fiscal 2013of approximately $25.2 million that are available to reduce future income, of which $12.2 million would expire in 2023 and $0.4$0.1 million and $1.2 million respectively for fiscal 2012. The would expire in 2025, with the remaining foreign net operating loss carry forwards are subject to separate limitations and will expire beginning in 2020.losses having unlimited carryforward.
Approximately $200.0 million of our foreign subsidiary undistributed earnings are deemed to be permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Accordingly, we have not provided U.S. income taxes on these earnings. The income tax provision from operations differs from tax provision computed at the 35% U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due to the following:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Tax at federal statutory rate$17,464
 35.0 % $31,324
 35.0 % $38,528
 35.0 %
Domestic manufacturing deduction(504) (1.0)% (700) (0.8)% (1,120) (1.0)%
Difference between U.S. and foreign tax(5,584) (11.2)% (8,539) (9.5)% (8,610) (7.9)%
State income taxes net of federal benefit718
 1.4 % 1,136
 1.3 % 1,741
 1.6 %
Repatriation of earnings
  % 
  % (506) (0.5)%
Research credit(799) (1.6)% (752) (0.9)% (209) (0.2)%
Other, net(198) (0.4)% 143
 0.2 % 277
 0.3 %
Income tax provision$11,097
 22.2 % $22,612
 25.3 % $30,101
 27.3 %
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits represent uncertain tax positions for which reserves have been established. As of March 30, 2013, we had $6.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $6.7 million will impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. As of March 31, 2012, we had $6.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $6.6 million will impact the effective tax rate, if recognized.
During the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 our unrecognized tax benefits were increased by $0.5 million as a result of additional tax benefits arising in the prior year return and current year.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011:

6374

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


As of April 2, 2016, we have provided $0.7 million of U.S. deferred taxes on approximately $5.4 million of unremitted earnings which are not indefinitely reinvested. Of this amount, $0.3 million affected the Company's effective tax rate in fiscal 2016. We have not provided U.S. deferred income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries of approximately $254.1 million as such amounts are considered to be indefinitely reinvested in the business. The accumulated earnings in the foreign subsidiaries are primarily utilized to fund working capital requirements as our subsidiaries continue to expand their operations, to service existing debt obligations and to fund future foreign acquisitions. We do not believe it is practicable to estimate the amount of income taxes payable on the earnings that are indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations.
The income tax provision from continuing operations differs from tax provision computed at the 35.0% U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due to the following:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Beginning Balance$6,885
 $4,669
 $4,620
Additions based upon positions related to the current year1,192
 1,124
 20
Additions for tax positions of prior years18
 1,216
 1,641
Reductions of tax positions
 (124) (1,042)
Settlements with taxing authorities(80) 
 
Closure of statute of limitations(1,085) 
 (570)
Ending Balance$6,930
 $6,885
 $4,669
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Tax at federal statutory rate$(18,695) 35.0 % $10,907
 35.0 % $12,739
 35.0 %
Difference between U.S. and foreign tax10,645
 (19.9)% (6,929) (22.2)% (10,846) (29.8)%
State income taxes net of federal benefit134
 (0.3)% (818) (2.6)% (252) (0.7)%
Change in uncertain tax positions(1,820) 3.4 % (1,762) (5.7)% (1,678) (4.6)%
Intercompany loan deduction
  % 
  % (2,185) (6.0)%
Unremitted earnings735
 (1.4)% 
  % 
  %
Deferred statutory rate changes(2,653) 5.0 % 
  % 
  %
Non-deductible goodwill impairment2,861
 (5.4)% 
  % 
  %
Non-deductible expenses1,491
 (2.8)% 1,237
 4.0 % 1,035
 2.8 %
Research credits(672) 1.3 % (1,000) (3.2)% (688) (1.9)%
Tax amortization of goodwill4,185
 (7.8)% 3,826
 12.3 % 
  %
Valuation allowance5,194
 (9.7)% 8,524
 27.4 % 2,400
 6.6 %
Other, net758
 (1.4)% 283
 0.8 % 728
 2.0 %
Income tax provision$2,163
 (4.0)% $14,268
 45.8 % $1,253
 3.4 %
We recorded an income tax provision of $2.2 million, representing an effective tax rate of (4)%. The effective tax rate of (4)% differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily as a result of the jurisdictional mix of earnings and losses generated in the U.S. and certain foreign subsidiaries that have a valuation allowance and therefore cannot be benefited. Other significant items impacting the rate include the tax provision related to the amortization of U.S. goodwill for tax purposes which gives rise to an indefinite lived deferred tax liability, a tax benefit related to deferred tax rate changes primarily associated with the decrease in the statutory rate applied to the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill for our Puerto Rico subsidiary and releases of tax reserves for uncertain tax positions. During the current year we changed our indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to a portion of the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. We have recorded a $0.3 million tax provision associated with the portion of unremitted foreign earnings that are not considered indefinitely reinvested.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits represent uncertain tax positions for which reserves have been established. As of April 2, 2016, we had $2.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $0.6 million would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. As of March 28, 2015, we had $7.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $2.0 million would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. At March 29, 2014, we had $5.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized.
During the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 our unrecognized tax benefits were decreased by $4.5 million primarily due to the release of certain previously established reserves as a result of accounting method changes that were filed during the year, as well as the release of other reserves as a result of the closure of tax statutes of limitations.

75

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended April 2, 2016, March 30, 201328, 2015 and March 29, 2014:
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Beginning Balance$7,070
 $5,604
 $6,930
Additions based upon positions related to the current year
 
 
Additions for tax positions of prior years340
 3,234
 990
Reductions of tax positions(4,158) 
 
Settlements with taxing authorities
 (338) 
Closure of statute of limitations(729) (1,430) (2,316)
Ending Balance$2,523
 $7,070
 $5,604
As of April 2, 2016 we anticipate that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions could change by up to $0.4$0.4 million in the next twelve months, as a result of closure of various foreign statutes of limitations.

Our historic practice has been and continues to be to recognize interest and penalties related to Federal, state and foreign income tax matters in income tax expense. Approximately $0.4 million and $0.80.7 million of gross interest and $1.0 million ispenalties were accrued for interest at March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, respectively and is not included in the amounts above. There was a benefit included in tax expense associated with accrued interest and penalties of $0.3 million, $0.3 million and zero for the periods ended April 2, 2016, March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, respectively.

We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated and separate Federal, state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. With a few exceptions, overseas, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, andor local orincome tax examinations for years before 2012 and foreign income tax examinations for years before 2009.2011.
10.9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We lease facilities and certain equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates through fiscal 2020.2026. Facility leases require us to pay certain insurance expenses, maintenance costs and real estate taxes.
Approximate future basic rental commitments under operating leases as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):follows:
Fiscal Year Ending 
 
(In thousands)  
2014$7,742
20156,321
20163,445
20172,103
$4,845
20181,685
3,830
20192,476
20201,820
20211,708
Thereafter2,689
6,143
$23,985
$20,822
Rent expense in fiscal 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014 was $7.0$6.8 million,, $6.1 $6.3 million, and $6.6$7.7 million,, respectively. Some of the Company's operating leases include renewal provisions, escalation clauses and options to purchase the facilities that we lease.
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although our ultimate liability cannot be determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
DuringItalian Employment Litigation
Our Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by employees of the third quarter of fiscal 2013,facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy where we issued a field action letter to blood center customers requesting visual inspection of a component of certain whole blood collection sets, due to the potential for a leak to occur at a very low frequency.  The component, referred to as a Y connector, was supplied by a contract manufacturer. We have recorded inventory reserves of $7.0 million in cost of goods sold within the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 for removal of affected whole blood collection sets from inventory for destruction or rework. We will pursue all available means of financial recovery related to this inventory loss. However, no salvage or recovery value from these efforts was recorded as we cannot currently conclude whether a favorable outcome will result.ceased manufacturing operations. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and minimum salaries

6476

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we received customer complaints in Europe regarding a quality issue with our High Separation Core Bowl (“HS Core”), a plasma disposable product used primarily to collect plasma for transfusion. Certain of these customers also made subsequent claims regarding financial losses alleged toshould have been incurred asestablished by either a resultdifferent classification under their national collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of this matter. Certain of these claims were recoverable under our product liability insurance policy. To date, we have recognized a $10.3 million liability offset by insurance receivables of $8.2 millionlow demand, are void, and an expense of $2.1 million. We collected $4.4 million of insurance receivables during fiscal 2013, which has been classified as an operating cash flow. For the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, only $0.2 million(iii) payment of the liability remains outstanding. We do not expect to record additional material claims or insurance recoveries related to this matter.extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.

ForIn addition, a union represented in the past six years, we have pursued patent infringement lawsuits against Fenwal Inc. seeking an injunction and damages from their infringement of a Haemonetics patent, through the sale of the ALYX brand automated red cell collection system, a competitor of our automated red cell collection systems.
Currently, we are pursuing a patent infringement action in Germany against Fenwal (Fresenius), and its European and German subsidiary. On September 20, 2010, we filed a patent infringement action in Germany. In response, FenwalAscoli plant has filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to invalidaterecall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the Haemonetics patent which isunion from certain meetings.

Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the subjectplant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.
As of this infringement action on December 1, 2010.
In April 2008, our subsidiary Haemonetics Italia, Srl. and two2, 2016, the total amount of its employees were found guilty by a court in Milan, Italy of charges arising from allegedly improper payments made under a consulting contract with a local physician and in pricing products under a tender from a public hospital. The two employees found guilty in this matter are no longer employeddamages claimed by the Company. On June 14, 2011,plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $4.6 million. It is not possible at this point in the final level appeals court affirmed these verdicts. There areproceedings to accurately evaluate the likelihood or amount of any potential losses and therefore no further appeals available andamounts have been accrued. We may receive other, similar claims in the convictions are now final. In connection with this conviction, our Italian subsidiary is liable to pay a fine of €147,500 and a proportionate share of the cost of the proceedings. The final amount has not yet been determined.future.
When this matter first arose, our Board of Directors commissioned independent legal counsel to conduct investigations on its behalf. Based upon its evaluation of counsel's report, the Board concluded that no disciplinary action was warranted in either case. Neither the original ruling nor its final affirmation has impacted the Company's business in Italy to date.
11.10. CAPITAL STOCK
Stock Plans
The Company has an incentive compensation plan,2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Incentive Compensation Plan”). The 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan permits the award of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock/restricted stock units, other stock units and performance shares to the Company’s key employees, officers and directors. The 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) consisting of three independent members of our Board of Directors.
The maximum number of shares available for award under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan is 15,024,920.19,824,920. The maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to incentive stock options may not exceed 500,000.500,000. Any shares that are subject to the award of stock options shall be counted against this limit as one (1) share for every one (1) share issued. Any shares that are subject to awards other than stock options shall be counted against this limit as3.26 3.02 shares for every one (1) share granted. The exercise pricetotal shares available for future grant as of April 2, 2016 was 6,037,933.
Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation cost related to stock-based transactions is recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on fair value. The total amount of stock-based compensation expense, which is recorded on a straight line basis, was as follows:
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
Selling, general and administrative expenses$5,183 $11,251 $10,507
Research and development1,060
 1,706
 1,545
Cost of goods sold706
 1,138
 1,030
 $6,949 $14,095 $13,082
We did not recognize an income tax benefit associated with our stock-based compensation arrangements for the non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock/restricted stock units, other stock unitsfiscal year ended April 2, 2016. We recognized an income tax benefit associated with our stock-based compensation arrangements of $4.5 million and performance$4.3 million for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014, respectively. There was no excess cash tax benefit classified as a financing cash inflow in fiscal 2016 and the excess cash tax benefit classified as a financing cash inflow in fiscal 2015 and 2014 was $1.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

77

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Stock Options
Options are granted to purchase ordinary shares granted under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan isat prices as determined by the Committee, but in no event shall such exercise price be less than the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant. Options Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units become exercisable, orgenerally vest in the case of restricted stock, the resale restrictions are released in a manner determined by the Committee, generallyequal installments over a four year period for employees and one year from grant for non-employee directors, and all optionsdirectors. Options expire not more than 7 years from the date of the grant. AtThe grant-date fair value of options, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.
A summary of stock option activity for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 is as follows:
 
Options
Outstanding
(shares)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding at March 28, 20153,761,666
 $33.90
 4.02 $37,067
Granted409,047
 32.50
    
Exercised(491,546) 28.55
    
Forfeited/Canceled(727,984) 37.98
    
Outstanding at April 2, 20162,951,183
 $33.59
 3.34 $9,684
        
Exercisable at April 2, 20162,288,166
 $33.22
 2.59 $8,428
        
Vested or expected to vest at April 2, 20162,847,285
 $33.56
 3.21 $9,432
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $4.5 million, $5.6 million, and $11.7 million during fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
As of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016, there were 3,876,780 shares subjectwas $4.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options, 354,589 sharesnon-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of restricted2.83 years.
The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted average of the high and low stock outstandingprices at the grant date and no shares subjectthe weighted average assumptions specific to restricted stock units outstanding under this plan and 6,596,195 shares available for future grant.
The Company had a long-term incentive stock option plan and a non-qualified stock option plan, (the “2000 Long-term Incentive Plan”) which permitted the issuance of a maximum of 7,000,000 sharesunderlying options. Expected volatility assumptions are based on the historical volatility of our common stock pursuantover the expected term of the option. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to incentivethe expected life of the option being valued. The expected life of the option was estimated with reference to historical exercise patterns, the contractual term of the option and non-qualified stock options granted to keythe vesting period.
The assumptions utilized for option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Volatility22.8% 22.5% 24.8%
Expected life (years)4.9
 4.9
 4.9
Risk-free interest rate1.4% 1.5% 1.3%
Dividend yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Fair value per option$7.40
 $7.91
 $10.15
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") generally vest in equal installments over a four year period for employees officers and one year from grant for non-employee directors. The plan was terminated in connection withgrant-date fair value of RSUs, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the adoptionrequisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The fair market value of RSUs is determined based on the market value of the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan. At March 30, 2013, there were 192,978 options outstanding under this plan and no further options will be granted under this plan.Company’s shares on the date of grant.

6578

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


A summary of RSU activity for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 is as follows:
 Shares 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at March 28, 2015357,547
 $36.73
Granted278,260
 33.19
Vested(112,333) 36.07
Forfeited(142,603) 36.72
Unvested at April 2, 2016380,871
 $34.33

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted and total fair value of RSUs vested were as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Grant-date fair value per RSU$33.19
 $34.89
 $42.24
Fair value of RSUs vested$36.07
 $36.62
 $32.70
As of April 2, 2016, there was $9.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.46 years.
Performance Stock Units
The grant date fair value of Performance Stock Units ("PSUs"), adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight line basis from the grant date through the end of the performance period. The value of these PSUs is based on relative shareholder return (total shareholder return for the Company as compared to total shareholder return of the PSU peer group), measured over a three year performance period. The PSU peer group consists of companies comprising the Standard & Poor's Health Care Equipment Index (the "Index"). Depending on the Company's relative performance during the performance period, a recipient of the award is entitled to receive a number of ordinary shares equal to a percentage, ranging from 0% to 200%, of the award granted. As a result, we may issue up to 204,672 shares related to these awards. If the Company’s total shareholder return for the performance period is negative, then any share payout will be capped at 100% of the target award, regardless of the Company's performance relative to the Index.
A summary of PSU activity for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 is as follows:
 Shares 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at March 28, 2015129,130
 $35.09
Granted80,145
 29.20
Vested
 
Forfeited(106,939) 34.22
Unvested at April 2, 2016102,336
 $31.38
The Company uses the Monte Carlo model to estimate the probability of satisfying the performance criteria and the resulting fair value of PSU awards. The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo model for PSUs granted during each year were as follows:
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Expected stock price volatility22.27% 20.08%
Peer group stock price volatility31.95% 31.52%
Correlation of returns26.27% 30.52%

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of PSUs granted was $29.20 and $35.09 in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.

79

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


As of April 2, 2016, there was $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.21 years.
Market Stock Units
The grant date fair value of Market Stock Units ("MSUs"), adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straight line basis from the grant date through the end of the performance period. The value of these MSUs is based the performance of Haemonetics’ stock through March 31, 2017. If Haemonetics' stock is below a minimum threshold price of $50 per share during the relevant measurement period, the holders receive no market share units. If the stock achieves certain price levels, the holders are eligible to receive up to three times the “target” amount of market share units. As a result, we may issue up to 458,904 shares at a stock price of $85 per share or higher in connection with these grants.
A summary of MSU activity for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016 is as follows:
 Shares 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at March 28, 2015287,682
 $33.90
Granted33,550
 10.21
Vested
 
Forfeited(168,264) 37.42
Unvested at April 2, 2016152,968
 $24.84

The Company uses the Monte Carlo model to determine the fair value of each market stock unit. The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo model for MSUs granted during each year were as follows:
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Volatility24.0% 21.2% 20.2%
Expected life (years)1.7
 2.8
 3.7
Risk-free interest rate0.5% 0.8% 0.9%
Dividend yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of MSUs granted was $10.21, $7.44 and $36.36 in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
As of April 2, 2016, there was $1.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested market stock units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”) under which a maximum of 1,400,000 shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar changes) of common stock may be purchased by eligible employees. Substantially all of our full-time employees are eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.
The Purchase Plan provides for two “purchase periods” within each of our fiscal years, the first commencing on November 1 of each year and continuing through April 30 of the next calendar year, and the second commencing on May 1 of each year and continuing through October 31 of such year. Shares are purchased through an accumulation of payroll deductions (of not less than 2% nor or more than 15% of compensation, as defined) for the number of whole shares determined by dividing the balance in the employee’s account on the last day of the purchase period by the purchase price per share for the stock determined under the Purchase Plan. The purchase price for shares is the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning of the purchase period, or 85% of such value at the end of the purchase period.
Stock-based compensation expense of $11.0 million, $9.3 million, and $10.8 million was recognized under ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 2, 2011, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized was $3.5 million, $2.7 million, and $3.7 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 2, 2011, respectively. We recognize stock-based compensation on a straight line basis.
ASC Topic 718 requires that cash flows relating to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of stock compensation cost recognized be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This excess tax benefit was $4.1 million, $1.4 million, and $3.1 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 2, 2011, respectively.
A summary of stock option activity for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 is as follows:
 
Options
Outstanding
(shares)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding at March 31, 20124,847,134
 $26.15
 3.87 $42,134
Granted904,998
 38.60
    
Exercised(1,402,298) 22.86
    
Forfeited(280,076) 29.05
    
Outstanding at March 30, 20134,069,758
 $29.85
 4.31 $48,061
        
Exercisable at March 30, 20132,052,602
 $26.42
 4.22 $31,287
        
Vested or expected to vest at March 30, 20133,838,353
 $29.56
 3.09 $46,433
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $20.9 million, $8.5 million, and $26.5 million during fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
As of March 30, 2013, there was $12.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted average of the high and low stock prices at the grant date and the weighted average assumptions specific to the underlying options. Expected volatility assumptions are based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term equal to the expected life of the option being valued. The expected life of the option was estimated with reference to historical exercise patterns, the contractual term of the option and the vesting period. The assumptions utilized for option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
 March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Volatility26.4% 27.5% 28.2%
Expected life (years)4.9
 4.9
 4.9
Risk-free interest rate0.8% 1.1% 1.8%
Dividend yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

6680

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The weighted average grant date fair value of options to purchase one share granted during 2013, 2012, and 2011 was approximately $9.76, $8.16, and $7.92, respectively.
We have applied, based on an analysis of our historical forfeitures, an annual forfeiture rate of 8% to all unvested stock options as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, which represents the portion that we expect will be forfeited each year over the vesting period.
The fair values of shares purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan are estimated using the Black-Scholes single option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Volatility24.9% 26.3% 21.1%21.1% 23.7% 22.9%
Expected life (months)6
 6
 6
6
 6
 6
Risk-free interest rate0.2% 0.1% 0.2%0.2% 0.1% 0.1%
Dividend Yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
The weighted average grant date fair value of the six-month option inherent in the Purchase Plan was approximately $7.80, $7.09, and $8.25 during fiscal $8.502016, $7.102015, and $5.87 during fiscal 2013, 2012, and 20112014, respectively.
Restricted Stock Awards
As of March 30, 2013, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards.
Restricted Stock Units
As of March 30, 2013, there was $8.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years.
A summary of restricted stock units activity for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 is as follows:
 Shares 
Weighted
Average
Market Value
at Grant Date
Nonvested at March 31, 2012321,526
 $25.86
Awarded178,322
 32.85
Released(112,986) 27.47
Forfeited(30,443) 31.23
Nonvested at March 30, 2013356,419
 $34.06

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

A summary of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income is as follows:

(In thousands) 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss) on
Derivatives,
Net of Tax
 
Impact of
Defined Benefit
Plans,
Net of Tax
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance, April 3, 2010 $5,271
 $1,454
 $(820) $5,905
Changes during the year 6,380
 (3,299) 555
 3,636
Balance, April 2, 2011 $11,651
 $(1,845) $(265) $9,541
Changes during the year (2,813) 6,370
 (3,988) (431)
Balance, March 31, 2012 $8,838
 $4,525
 $(4,253) $9,110
Changes during the year (4,705) 1,848
 (820) (3,677)
Balance, March 30, 2013 $4,133
 $6,373
 $(5,073) $5,433

67

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


12.11. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the effect of potentially dilutive common shares. The common stock weighted average number of shares has been retroactively adjusted for the stock split.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Basic EPS 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
Weighted average shares51,349
 50,727
 50,154
50,910
 51,533
 51,611
Basic income per share$0.76
 $1.32
 $1.59
Basic (loss) income per share$(1.09) $0.33
 $0.68
Diluted EPS 
  
  
 
  
  
Net income$38,800
 $66,886
 $79,980
Net (loss) income$(55,579) $16,897
 $35,148
Basic weighted average shares51,349
 50,727
 50,154
50,910
 51,533
 51,611
Net effect of common stock equivalents910
 863
 1,038

 556
 766
Diluted weighted average shares52,259
 51,590
 51,192
50,910
 52,089
 52,377
Diluted income per share$0.74
 $1.30
 $1.56
Diluted (loss) income per share$(1.09) $0.32
 $0.67
Basic earnings per share is calculated using our weighted-average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using our weighted-average outstanding common shares including the dilutive effect of stock awards as determined under the treasury stock method. For fiscal 2016, we recognized a net loss; therefore we excluded the impact of outstanding stock awards from the diluted loss per share calculation as their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect. Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of 0.5 million, 1.41.6 million and 2.41.1 million stock options and restricted share units for fiscal years 2013, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively, because these securities were anti-dilutive during the noted periods.
13.12. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:
(In thousands) March 30, 2013 March 31, 2012
 April 2, 2016 March 28, 2015
Land $4,216
 $1,136
 $7,905
 $9,468
Building and building improvements 78,682
 58,680
 117,132
 118,384
Plant equipment and machinery 205,698
 136,057
 238,549
 220,793
Office equipment and information technology 103,235
 88,185
 127,019
 118,810
Haemonetics equipment 240,889
 226,476
 295,853
 264,307
Total 632,720
 510,534
 786,458
 731,762
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (375,767) (348,877) (448,824) (409,814)
Property, plant and equipment, net $256,953
 $161,657
 $337,634
 $321,948

81

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


During fiscal 2016, we impaired $9.1 million of property, plant and equipment as a result of our global strategic review, of which $6.9 million was included within impairment of assets on the consolidated statements of (loss) income and the remaining $2.2 million was included within cost of goods sold. Approximately $3.0 million of the property, plant and equipment impairment was the result of the write down to fair value of certain land, buildings and related equipment in connection with its reclassification to assets held for sale, as discussed below. We determined the fair value of these assets using a probability weighted average cash flow method. This impairment impacted our EMEA segment, while the remaining $6.1 million related to our All Other segment.
Depreciation expense of $56.8 million in fiscal 2016, includes $0.8 million of additional depreciation expense due to asset impairments during the period related to assets that were previously place in service. Depreciation expense was $43.4$52.6 million, $38.6 for both fiscal 2015 and 2014.
Assets Held for Sale
We periodically review long-lived assets against our plan to retain or ultimately dispose of properties and equipment. If we decide to dispose of a property or equipment, it will be moved to assets held for sale and actively marketed. We analyze market conditions each reporting period and record additional impairments due to declines in market values of like assets. The fair value of the property is determined by observable inputs such as appraisals and prices of comparable properties in active markets for assets like ours. Gains are not recognized until the properties are sold.
Assets held for sale includes land, buildings and related equipment for properties we plan to dispose of. The assets are valued at the lower of net depreciable value or net realizable value. At April 2, 2016, we have one property and related equipment totaling $1.7 million, and $36.8 million that we have reclassified to assets held for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.sale. This amount is included within other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet.

During fiscal 2013, there was a change in the estimated useful lives of Haemonetics equipment which resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense of $4.5 million, an increase of $3.3 million in net income, and an increase in basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.09.
14.13. RETIREMENT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plans
We have a Savings Plus Plan (the "Plan") that is a 401(k) plan that allows our U.S. employees to accumulate savings on a pre-tax basis. In addition, matching contributions are made to the Plan based upon pre-established rates. Our matching contributions amounted to approximately $5.4 million, $4.95.8 million in 2013, $4.0 million in 2012, and $3.36.2 million in fiscal 2016, 2015, and 20112014., respectively. Upon Board approval, additional

68

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


discretionary contributions can also be made. No discretionary contributions were made for the Savings Plan in fiscal 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, or 2011.2014.
Some of our subsidiaries also have defined contribution plans, to which plan both the employee and the employer make contributions. The employer contributions to these plans totaled $0.8 million, $2.4 million, $0.81.0 million, and $1.80.8 million in fiscal 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014, respectively, of which $1.5 million in fiscal 2011 was contributed for our employees in Switzerland.respectively.
Defined Benefit Plans
ASC Topic 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits, requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s over-funded status or a liability for a plan’s under-funded status; (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirementpost retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. Accordingly, the Company is required to report changes in its funded status in comprehensive (loss) income on its Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive (Loss) Income.
Benefits under these plans are generally based on either career average or final average salaries and creditable years of service as defined in the plans. The annual cost for these plans is determined using the projected unit credit actuarial cost method that includes actuarial assumptions and estimates which are subject to change.

82

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Some of the our foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all full time employees at those subsidiaries. Net periodic benefit costs for the plans in the aggregate include the following components:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Service cost$2,759
 $2,545
 $667
Interest cost on benefit obligation639
 601
 283
Expected (return)/loss on plan assets(413) 2
 (467)
Actuarial (gain)/loss196
 (385) (48)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost(14) (31) 381
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation48
 221
 30
Totals$3,215
 $2,953
 $846
The net periodic benefit costs shown above for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 include the associated costs for the Switzerland defined benefit plan. The net periodic benefit costs for fiscal 2011 shown above have not been updated to reflect the Switzerland plan costs; these costs were approximately $1.5 million. During fiscal 2011, the Switzerland plan was accounted for as a defined contribution plan and Company contributions to the plan were expensed.
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
Service cost$3,560
 $2,979
 $3,351
Interest cost on benefit obligation371
 686
 623
Expected (return)/loss on plan assets(330) (449) (435)
Actuarial loss/(gain)598
 107
 88
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost(38) (29) 182
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation42
 45
 47
Totals$4,203
 $3,339
 $3,856



69

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The activity under those defined benefit plans are as follows:
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
Change in Benefit Obligation: 
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of year$(40,567) $(32,621)
Service cost(3,560) (2,979)
Interest cost(371) (686)
Benefits paid3,780
 4,902
Actuarial (loss)/gain424
 (6,883)
Employee and plan participants contribution(1,839) (2,978)
Plan Amendments833
 114
Foreign currency changes3,381
 564
Benefit obligation, end of year$(37,919) $(40,567)
Change in Plan Assets: 
  
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year$23,165
 $19,981
Company contributions1,987
 2,112
Benefits paid(3,779) (4,621)
Gain/(Loss) on plan assets446
 506
Employee and plan participants contributions1,861
 2,851
Foreign currency changes(3,828) 2,336
Fair value of Plan Assets, end of year$19,852
 $23,165
Funded Status*$(18,067) $(17,402)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss/(gain)10,168
 11,096
Unrecognized initial obligation37
 64
Unrecognized prior service cost(1,186) (459)
Net amount recognized$(9,048) $(6,701)
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
Change in Benefit Obligation: 
  
Benefit Obligation, beginning of year$(27,150) $(22,707)
Service cost(2,759) (2,545)
Interest cost(639) (601)
Benefits paid3,210
 1,952
Actuarial (loss)/gain(1,364) (1,244)
Employee and plan participants contribution(2,926) (1,728)
Plan Amendments
 (193)
Foreign currency changes1,502
 (84)
Benefit obligation, end of year$(30,126) $(27,150)
Change in Plan Assets: 
  
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year$18,185
 $15,798
Company contributions2,381
 2,156
Benefits paid(3,210) (1,873)
Gain/(Loss) on plan assets397
 124
Employee and plan participants contributions2,926
 1,728
Foreign currency changes(1,102) 252
Fair value of Plan Assets, end of year$19,577
 $18,185
Funded Status$(10,549) $(8,965)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss/(gain)5,418
 4,513
Unrecognized initial obligation184
 141
Unrecognized prior service cost138
 254
Net amount recognized$(4,809) $(4,057)
*The unfunded status is all non-current.
One of the benefit plans is funded by benefit payments made by the Company. Accordingly that plan has no assets included in the information presented above. The total liability for this plan was $5.4$8.7 million and $4.99.2 million as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, respectively.
The accumulated benefit obligation for all plans was $22.2$36.4 million and $22.534.9 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, respectively. There were no plans where the plan assets were greater than the accumulated benefit obligation as of April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015.

7083

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The components of the change recorded in our accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income related to our defined benefit plans, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
Balance, April 3, 2010$(820)
Balance, March 30, 2013$(5,073)
Obligation at transition574
172
Actuarial loss(50)(129)
Prior service cost31
438
Balance as of April 2, 2011$(265)
Balance as of March 29, 2014$(4,592)
Obligation at transition30
(19)
Actuarial loss(3,701)(6,198)
Prior service cost(317)1,886
Balance as of March 31, 2012$(4,253)
Balance as of March 28, 2015$(8,923)
Obligation at transition556
33
Actuarial loss(1,237)681
Prior service cost(139)717
Balance as of March 30, 2013$(5,073)
Balance as of April 2, 2016$(7,492)
We expect to amortize $0.6$0.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net periodic benefit cost during 2014.2017.
The weighted average rates used to determine the net periodic benefit costs and projected benefit obligations were as follows:
March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Discount rate1.97% 2.40% 5.30%0.72% 0.93% 2.02%
Rate of increased salary levels1.42% 1.50% 2.60%1.58% 1.65% 1.57%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets1.92% 2.10% 1.60%1.20% 1.68% 1.94%

Assumptions for expected long-term rate of return on plan assets are based upon actual historical returns, future expectations of returns for each asset class and the effect of periodic target asset allocation rebalancing. The results are adjusted for the payment of reasonable expenses of the plan from plan assets. We recognized $0.1 million of deferred taxes in fiscal 2013 .
We have no other material obligation for post-retirement or post-employment benefits.
Our investment policy for pension plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio to reduce interest rate and market risk. Maturities are managed so that sufficient liquidity exists to meet immediate and future benefit payment requirements.
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides guidance for reporting and measuring the plan assets of our defined benefit pension plan at fair value as of March 30, 2013April 2, 2016. Using the same three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements as described in Note 7,6, Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements, all of the assets of the Company’s plan are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the plan assets are primarily insurance contracts.
Expected benefit payments for both plans are estimated using the same assumptions used in determining the company’s benefit obligation at March 30, 2013April 2, 2016. Benefit payments will depend on future employment and compensation levels, average years employed and average life spans, among other factors, and changes in any of these factors could significantly affect these estimated future benefit payments.

7184

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


Estimated future benefit payments during the next five years and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):follows:
Expected Benefit Payments 
Fiscal Year 2014$1,200
Fiscal Year 2015$1,327
Fiscal Year 2016$1,308
Fiscal Year 2017$1,217
Fiscal Year 2018$844
Fiscal Year 2019-2023$4,714
(in thousands) 
Fiscal Year 2017$1,746
Fiscal Year 20181,542
Fiscal Year 20191,523
Fiscal Year 20201,883
Fiscal Year 20211,687
Fiscal Year 2022-20267,872
 $16,253
The CompanyCompany's contributions for fiscal 20142017 are expected to be consistent with the current year.
15.14. SEGMENT AND ENTERPRISE-WIDE INFORMATION
Segment Definition Criteria
We managedetermine our reportable segments by first identifying our operating segments, and then by assessing whether any components of these segments constitute a business for which discrete financial information is available and where segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Our operating segments are based primarily on geography. North America Plasma is a separate operating segment with dedicated segment management due the basis of one operating segment: the design, manufacture,size and marketing of blood management solutions. Our chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated results to make operating and strategic decisions. Manufacturing processes, as well as the regulatory environment in which we operate, are largely the same for all product categories.
Enterprise Wide Disclosures About Product and Services
We have four global product families: plasma, blood center, hospital, and software solutions.
Our products include whole blood disposables, equipment devices and the related disposables used with these devices. Disposables include part of plasma, blood center, and hospital product families. Plasma consistsscale of the disposables usedplasma business. We aggregate components within an operating segment that have similar economic characteristics.
In prior periods, the Company believed a single reportable segment was consistent with its basic organizational structure and believed aggregation was consistent with its primary basis for decision making. As a result, prior year segment information has been restated to perform apheresis forconform to fiscal 2016's reportable segments.
The Company’s reportable segments are as follows:
Japan
Europe, Middle East and Africa (collectively “EMEA”)
North America Plasma
All Other
The Company has aggregated the separationfollowing two operating segments into the All Other reportable segment based upon their similar operational and economic characteristics, including similarity of whole blood componentsoperating margin:
Americas Blood Center and subsequent collection of plasmaHospital
Asia - Pacific
Management measures and evaluates the Company’s operating segments based on operating margin. Management excludes certain corporate expenses from segment operating income. In addition, certain amounts that management considers to be usednon-recurring or non-operational are excluded from segment operating income because management evaluates the operating results of the segments excluding such items. These items include restructuring and transformation costs, deal amortization, impairments and other (income)/expense associated with certain acquisitions. Although these amounts are excluded from segment operating income, as applicable, they are included in the reconciliations that follow. Segment assets have not been presented since management does not evaluate the Company’s operating segments using this information. Further, management measures and evaluates the Company's net revenues and operating income on a raw material for biologically derived pharmaceuticals. Blood center consists of disposables which separate whole blood for the subsequent collection of platelets, plasma, red cells, orconstant currency basis, therefore segment information is presented on a combination of these components for transfusion to patients as well as disposables for manual whole blood collection. Hospital consists of surgical disposables (principally the Cell Saver® autologous blood recovery system targeted to procedures that involve rapid, high volume blood loss such as cardiovascular surgeries and the cardioPAT® cardiovascular perioperative autotransfusion system designed to remain with the patient following surgery to recover blood and the patient’s red cells to prepare them for reinfusion), the OrthoPAT® orthopedic perioperative autotransfusion system designed to operate both during and after surgery to recover and wash the patient’s red cells to prepare them for reinfusion, and diagnostics products (principally the TEG® Thrombelastograph® hemostasis analyzer used to help assess a surgical patient’s hemostasis during and after surgery).
Software solutions include information technology platforms that assist blood centers, plasma centers, and hospitals to more effectively manage regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.constant currency basis.











7285

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



Revenues from External Customers:Selected information by business segment is presented below:
(In thousands)March 30,
2013
 March 31,
2012
 April 2,
2011
Disposable revenues 
  
  
Plasma disposables$268,900
 $258,061
 $227,209
Blood center disposables 
  
  
Platelet169,602
 167,946
 156,251
Red cell49,733
 48,034
 46,828
Whole blood138,436
 
 
 357,771
 215,980
 203,079
Hospital disposables 
  
  
Surgical73,508
 66,619
 66,503
OrthoPAT30,230
 31,186
 35,631
Diagnostics27,356
 23,087
 19,414
 131,094
 120,892
 121,548
Disposables revenue757,765
 594,933
 551,836
Software solutions69,952
 70,557
 66,876
Equipment & other64,273
 62,354
 57,982
Total revenues$891,990
 $727,844
 $676,694
Enterprise Wide Disclosures About Product and Services
Year Ended (in thousands)
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Net revenues     
Japan$84,270
 $83,547
 $89,041
EMEA175,874
 183,753
 193,691
North America Plasma279,803
 240,705
 213,215
All Other370,568
 375,827
 400,133
Net revenues (constant currency)910,515
 883,832
 896,080
Effect of exchange rates(1,683) 26,541
 42,429
Net revenues (reported)$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
March 30, 2013
United
States
 
Other
North
America
 
Total
North
America
 Japan 
Other
Asia
 
Total
Europe
 
Total
Consolidated
Sales$454,874
 $6,851
 $461,725
 $120,726
 $84,860
 $224,679
 $891,990
Total Assets$830,754
 $225,849
 $1,056,603
 $44,189
 $41,037
 $320,088
 $1,461,917
Long-Lived Assets$503,606
 $209,439
 $713,045
 $12,977
 $8,076
 $117,717
 $851,815
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Segment operating income     
Japan$37,165
 $36,843
 $38,685
EMEA36,976
 44,998
 49,373
North America Plasma100,367
 89,092
 82,497
All Other135,580
 142,531
 154,099
Segment operating income (constant currency)310,088
 313,464
 324,654
Corporate operating expenses (constant currency)(194,361) (189,867) (186,562)
Non-GAAP operating income (constant currency)115,727
 123,597
 138,092
Effect of exchange rates3,977
 13,906
 21,147
Non-GAAP operating income (reported)119,704
 137,503
 159,239
Unallocated amounts     
Restructuring and transformation costs42,185
 69,697
 84,706
Deal amortization28,958
 30,184
 28,056
Impairment of assets97,230
 
 
Contingent consideration (income) expense(4,727) (2,918) 45
Operating (loss) income$(43,942) $40,540
 $46,432
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Depreciation and amortization     
Japan$774
 $767
 $839
EMEA5,146
 5,045
 4,695
North America Plasma12,944
 11,229
 8,776
All Other71,047
 69,012
 67,430
Total depreciation and amortization (excluding impairment charges)$89,911
 $86,053
 $81,740

March 31, 2012
United
States
 
Other
North
America
 
Total
North
America
 Japan 
Other
Asia
 
Total
Europe
 
Total
Consolidated
Sales$352,160
 $512
 $352,672
 $124,381
 $67,223
 $183,568
 $727,844
Total Assets$634,171
 $15,365
 $649,536
 $50,509
 $27,353
 $183,737
 $911,135
Long-Lived Assets$305,370
 $12,796
 $318,166
 $13,128
 $3,961
 $38,009
 $373,264

April 2, 2011
United
States
 
Other
North
America
 
Total
North
America
 Japan 
Other
Asia
 
Total
Europe
 
Total
Consolidated
Sales$316,447
 $908
 $317,355
 $110,263
 $61,594
 $187,482
 $676,694
Total Assets$582,733
 $15,903
 $598,636
 $47,156
 $18,164
 $169,308
 $833,264
Long-Lived Assets$305,305
 $12,715
 $318,020
 $12,391
 $4,181
 $38,092
 $372,684

The Long-Lived Assets reported above include Goodwill, Intangibles and Net Property, Plant and Equipment.

7386

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


16.RESTRUCTURING
During fiscal 2012, our restructuring activities primarily consisted of reorganization within our research and development, manufacturing and software operations. Employee-related costs primarily consist of employee severance and benefits. Facility-related costs primarily consist of charges associated with closing facilities, related lease obligations, and other related costs.
For fiscal 2013, we incurred $6.6 million of restructuring charges and a $4.2 million asset write-down. The asset write-down is associated with exiting activities related to technologies originally acquired from Arryx, Inc. Restructuring expenses have been primarily included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of income.
On April 1, 2010, our Board of Directors approved transformation and restructuring plans, which include the integration of Global Med Technologies, Inc. During fiscal 2011, in addition to the costs in the below table and as part of our approved transformation and restructuring plans, we incurred the following expenses:
Stock compensation expense of $1.7 million resulting from the acceleration of unvested stock options in accordance to terms of an employment contract for an employee. This expense is included as part of our restructuring charges and reflected in our consolidated statements of income as selling, general and administrative expense for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011.
$2.1 million of integration costs related to the Global Med acquisition.
The following summarizes the restructuring activity for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013, March 31, 2012, and April 2, 2011, respectively:
(In thousands)Balance at March 31, 2012 Cost
Incurred
 Payments Asset
Write down
 Restructuring Accrual Balance at March 30, 2013
Employee-related costs$1,461
 $6,214
 $(4,586) $
 $3,089
Facility related costs533
 431
 (791) 
 173
Asset write-down
 4,247
 
 (4,247) 
 $1,994
 $10,892
 $(5,377) $(4,247) $3,262

(In thousands)Balance at April 2, 2011 Cost
Incurred
 Payments Asset
Write down
 Restructuring Accrual Balance at March 31, 2012
Employee-related costs$2,782
 $4,112
 $(5,433) $
 $1,461
Facility related costs889
 1,746
 (2,102) 
 533
 $3,671
 $5,858
 $(7,535) $
 $1,994
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Long-lived assets(1)
     
Japan$33,159
 $31,810
 $28,544
EMEA63,861
 66,223
 59,034
North America Plasma116,001
 101,272
 75,597
All Other124,613
 122,643
 108,262
Total long-lived assets$337,634
 $321,948
 $271,437
(1)Long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and equipment.
Long-lived assets in our principle operating regions are as follows:
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
United States$231,744
 $208,439
 $185,227
Japan2,022
 1,618
 2,563
Europe18,672
 27,786
 37,154
Asia40,235
 39,032
 8,785
Other44,961
 45,073
 37,708
Total$337,634
 $321,948
 $271,437
Net revenues by product line are as follows:
(In thousands)April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
Disposable revenues 
  
  
Plasma disposables$348,785
 $319,190
 $291,895
Blood center disposables 
  
  
Platelet143,274
 152,588
 156,643
Red cell39,256
 42,700
 42,378
Whole blood128,532
 143,905
 190,698
 311,062
 339,193
 389,719
Hospital disposables 
  
  
Diagnostics50,882
 42,187
 33,302
Surgical59,902
 62,540
 66,876
OrthoPAT13,823
 20,316
 25,042
 124,607
 125,043
 125,220
      
Disposables revenue784,454
 783,426
 806,834
      
Software solutions72,434
 72,185
 70,441
Equipment & other51,944
 54,762
 61,234
Net revenues$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509

(In thousands)Balance at April 3, 2010 Cost
Incurred
 Payments Asset
Write down
 Restructuring Accrual Balance at April 2, 2011
Employee-related costs$9,761
 $3,595
 $(10,574) $
 $2,782
Facility related costs
 889
 
 
 889
 $9,761
 $4,484
 $(10,574) $
 $3,671

7487

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


17.Net revenues generated in our principle operating regions are as follows:
 April 2,
2016
 March 28,
2015
 March 29,
2014
United States$519,440
 $494,788
 $500,719
Japan81,411
 88,298
 108,679
Europe187,725
 215,575
 224,792
Asia111,758
 102,095
 94,762
Other8,498
 9,617
 9,557
Total$908,832
 $910,373
 $938,509
15. RESTRUCTURING

On an ongoing basis, we review the global economy, the healthcare industry, and the markets in which we compete to identify opportunities for efficiencies, enhance commercial capabilities, align our resources and offer our customers better solutions. In order to realize these opportunities, we undertake restructuring-type activities to transform our business.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, in connection with our global strategic review, we launched the first phase of a restructuring program designed to reposition our organization and improve our cost structure. The first phase includes both a reduction of headcount and operating costs as well as projects to simplify product lines. We may also take additional steps to modify our manufacturing operations to reflect our strategic direction.

We expect to incur approximately $26 million of restructuring and transformation charges, comprised of $17 million in termination benefits and $9 million in other related exit costs. Substantially all of these charges will result in future cash outlays and are expected to be incurred during fiscal 2017. Savings from this program are estimated to be approximately $40 million in fiscal 2017. Subsequent phases of the program may require restructuring charges in future fiscal years.

In fiscal 2016, we completed our Value Creation and Capture (“VCC”) opportunities initiative. This initiative included (i) discontinuation of manufacturing activities at our Ascoli-Piceno, Italy and Braintree, Massachusetts facilities, (ii) expansion of our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico, (iii) transfer of all equipment production to our contract manufacturer, Sanmina Corporation, and (iv) consolidation of the manufacturing of product formerly produced in the U.S. and Italy to our new manufacturing facility in Penang, Malaysia. We continue to manufacture in Bothwell, Scotland. The cumulative restructuring charges incurred as a result of the VCC initiative were $100.1 million.

88

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



The following summarizes the restructuring activity for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2016, March 28, 2015, and March 29, 2014, respectively:
(In thousands)Severance and Other Employee Costs Other Costs Accelerated Depreciation Asset
Write Down
 Total Restructuring
Balance at March 30, 2013$3,089
 $173
 $
 $
 $3,262
Costs incurred31,492
 14,254
 2,390
 915
 49,051
Payments(11,673) (13,699) 
 
 (25,372)
Non-cash adjustments
 
 (2,390) (915) (3,305)
Balance at March 29, 2014$22,908
 $728
 $
 $
 $23,636
Costs incurred19,879
 15,362
 1,326
 296
 36,863
Payments(26,394) (15,871) 
 
 (42,265)
Non-cash adjustments
 
 (1,326) (296) (1,622)
Balance at March 28, 2015$16,393
 $219
 $
 $
 $16,612
Costs incurred10,707
 7,846
 1,469
 3,033
 23,055
Payments(18,348) (8,065) 
 
 (26,413)
Non-cash adjustments
 
 (1,469) (3,033) (4,502)
Balance at April 2, 2016$8,752
 $
 $
 $
 $8,752

The substantial majority of restructuring expenses have been included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income. Total restructuring charges for fiscal 2016 include a $3.0 million asset write down to fair value related to land, buildings and related equipment for a property we plan to dispose of, as discussed in Note 12, Property Plant and Equipment. As of April 2, 2016, we had a restructuring liability of $8.8 million, of which, approximately $8.1 million is payable within the next twelve months.

In addition to the restructuring expenses included in the table above, we also incurred $19.2 million of costs that do not constitute as restructuring under ASC 420, which we refer to as "Transformation Costs". These costs consist primarily of expenditures directly related to our transformation activities including program management, product line transfer teams and related costs, infrastructure related costs, accelerated depreciation and asset disposals. These costs exclude the impact of contingent consideration of $4.9 million which was reversed during the third quarter of fiscal 2016 and is presented within the contingent consideration (income) expense lineon the consolidated statements of (loss) income. The contingent consideration reversal of $2.9 million and an insignificant amount were also excluded for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively.

The table below presents transformation and restructuring costs recorded in cost of goods sold, research and development, selling, general and administrative expenses and other expense, net in our consolidated statements of (loss) income for the periods presented.
Transformation costs     
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Transformation and other costs$17,377
 $26,979
 $30,656
Accelerated depreciation155
 930
 4,203
Asset disposal1,697
 4,925
 796
Total$19,229
 $32,834
 $35,655

89

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


The tables below present restructuring and transformation costs by reportable segment:
Restructuring costs     
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Japan$9
 $258
 $372
EMEA3,210
 3,310
 1,444
North America Plasma
 360
 42
All Other19,836
 32,935
 47,193
Total$23,055
 $36,863
 $49,051
      
Transformation costs     
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Japan$416
 $158
 $131
EMEA961
 838
 1,260
North America Plasma
 28
 
All Other17,852
 31,810
 34,264
Total$19,229
 $32,834
 $35,655
      
Total restructuring and transformation$42,284
 $69,697
 $84,706
16. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
The cost of software that is developed or obtained for internal use is accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. Pursuant to ASC Topic 350, the Company capitalizeswe capitalize costs incurred during the application development stage of software developed for internal use, and expensesexpense costs incurred during the preliminary project and the post-implementation operation stages of development. The Companycosts capitalized $7.5 million and $3.6 million in costs incurred for acquisition of the software license and related software development costs for new internal software that was in the application development stage during the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The capitalized costseach project are included as a component of property, plant and equipmentin intangible assets in the consolidated financial statements.
For costs incurred related to the development of software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed, the Company applieswe apply the provisions of ASC Topic 985-20, Software - Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed, which specifies that costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers.
We capitalized $6.2$17.0 million and $6.19.5 million in software development costs for ongoing initiatives during the fiscal years ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, respectively. At March 30, 2013April 2, 2016 and March 31, 201228, 2015, we have a total of $25.7$54.9 million and $19.539.7 million, respectively, of software costs capitalized, of which $20.0$14.4 million and $15.4$7.9 million, respectively, are related to in process software development initiatives. In connection with these development activities, we capitalized interest of $0.3 millioninitiatives, respectively, and $0.2 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. We amortize capitalized costs when the productsremaining balance represents in-service assets that are released for sale. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, $1.7 million of capitalized costs related to one project were placed into service, compared to $4.1 million of capitalized costs placed into service during fiscal 2012. Amortization of capitalized software development cost expense was $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively.being amortized over their useful lives. The costs capitalized for each project are included in intangible assets in the consolidated financial statements. In connection with these development activities, we capitalized interest of $0.2 million and $0.2 million in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively. We amortize capitalized costs when the products are released for sale. During fiscal 2016, $8.7 million of capitalized costs were placed into service, compared to $15.7 million of capitalized costs placed into service during fiscal 2015. Amortization of capitalized software development cost expense was $10.9 million, $3.2 million and $1.1 million for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization expense in fiscal 2016 includes $6.0 million of impairment charges related to the discontinuance of certain capitalized software projects as a result of our global strategic review in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. These impairment charges are classified within costs of goods sold on our consolidated statements of (loss) income and relate to capitalized software projects included in our All Other segment.
18.SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)Three months ended
2013June 30, September 29, December 29, March 30,
Net revenues$176,475
 $218,178
 $247,395
 $249,942
Gross profit$90,113
 $101,762
 $113,115
 $123,141
Operating income$13,079
 $9,901
 $15,747
 $17,710
Net income$9,787
 $6,547
 $9,904
 $12,562
Per share data: 
  
  
  
Net Income: 
  
  
  
Basic$0.19
 $0.13
 $0.19
 $0.24
Diluted$0.19
 $0.13
 $0.19
 $0.24
        
 Three months ended
2012July 2, October 1, December 31, March 31,
Net revenues$170,569
 $179,445
 $191,160
 $186,670
Gross profit$88,748
 $89,949
 $95,931
 $94,612
Operating income$23,908
 $18,566
 $25,324
 $20,960
Net income$16,947
 $13,880
 $18,254
 $17,805
Per share data: 
  
  
  
Net Income: 
  
  
  
Basic$0.33
 $0.27
 $0.36
 $0.35
Diluted$0.32
 $0.27
 $0.36
 $0.35


7590

Table of Contents
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


19.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS17. SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands) Three months ended
Fiscal 2016 June 27,
2015
 September 26,
2015
 December 26,
2015
 April 2,
2016
Net revenues $213,413
 $219,693
 $233,384
 $242,342
Gross profit $102,539
 $105,297
 $108,855
 $89,223
Operating income (loss) $3,606
 $19,179
 $(61,177) $(5,550)
Net (loss) income $(267) $12,863
 $(59,440) $(8,735)
Per share data:  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income:  
  
  
  
Basic $(0.01) $0.25
 $(1.17) $(0.17)
Diluted $(0.01) $0.25
 $(1.17) $(0.17)
         
(In thousands) Three months ended
Fiscal 2015 June 28,
2014
 September 27,
2014
 December 27,
2014
 March 28,
2015
Net revenues $224,488
 $227,580
 $231,827
 $226,478
Gross profit $106,278
 $108,114
 $111,661
 $108,365
Operating (loss) income $(1,666) $12,407
 $18,260
 $11,539
Net (loss) income $(3,649) $7,487
 $15,988
 $(2,929)
Per share data:  
  
  
  
Net (loss) income:  
  
  
  
Basic $(0.07) $0.15
 $0.31
 $(0.06)
Diluted $(0.07) $0.14
 $0.31
 $(0.06)

Value Creation and Capture

On April 29, 2013, we committed to a plan to pursue identified Value Creation and Capture ("VCC") opportunities. These opportunitiesThe operating results for the first quarter of fiscal 2016 include investmentthe correction of an understatement of the provision for income taxes in product line extensions and next generation products, enhancement of commercial capabilities and a transformation of our manufacturing network. The transformation of our manufacturing network will take place over the next threefiscal years and includes changes to the current manufacturing footprint and supply chain structure (the "Network Plan").

To implement the Network Plan, we will (i) discontinue manufacturing activities at our Braintree, Massachusetts location, (ii) create a technology center of excellence for product development, (iii) expand our current facility in Tijuana, Mexico and (iv) build a new manufacturing facility in Asia closer to our customer base in that region.

We estimate we will incur approximately $23.0 million of cash restructuring expenses during fiscal 2014 which will be recorded through cost of goods sold. To complete the Network Plan we estimate that we will spend an additional $8.0 million for cash restructuring expenses in future years. These costs consist principally of employee related costs, product line transfer costs including relocation and validation,2015 as well as redundant overheadother certain out of period items, which were determined to be immaterial to all periods presented. Absent this correction, our operating income and inefficiencies duringnet income for the transfer period. The managementthree months ended June 27, 2015 would have been $0.8 million lower and execution of this effort will require a dedicated team of program managers, engineers, regulatory and quality professionals,$0.2 million higher, respectively, than the cost of which isamount included in these estimates. We also expect to incur non-cash costs of approximately $5.0 million consisting of accelerated depreciation and asset write-downs.above.

Activities underThe operating results for the Plan will be initiatedthird quarter of fiscal 2016 include the correction of an overstated liability in fiscal 2014 and are expectedcertain other out of period items, which were determined to be substantially completed inimmaterial to all periods presented. Absent these corrections, our operating loss and net loss for the next three years.   Additionally, we expect to deploy approximately $36.0months ended December 26, 2015 would have been $4.1 million of cash in fiscal 2014 for capital expenditures to expand our existing Tijuana, Mexico facility higher and construct a new facility in Asia.$4.0 million higher, respectively, than the amount included above.

We also expectThe operating results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 include corrections of certain out of period items, the impact of which were determined to incur cash costs totaling $29.0be immaterial to all periods presented. Absent these corrections, our operating loss and net loss for the three months ended April 2, 2016 would have been $2.9 million associated with our other VCC opportunities, completion of lower and $1.8 million lower, respectively, than the integration of the whole blood business and the recent acquisition of Hemerus.amount included above.

Acquisition of Hemerus

On April 30, 2013 we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Hemerus LLC, a Minnesota based company that develops innovative technologies for the collection of whole blood and processing and storage of blood components. Hemerus has received FDA approval for SOLX® whole blood collection system for eight hour storage of whole blood. Hemerus previously received CE Marking (Conformité Européenne) in the European Union to market SOLX as the world's first 56-day red blood cell storage solution. We paid $23.0 million cash in addition to the $1.0 million paid early in fiscal 2013. We will pay an additional $3.0 million upon a further FDA approval of the SOLX solution for 24 hour storage of whole blood prior to processing, and will pay up to $14.0 million on future sales of SOLX-based products.


7691

Table of Contents
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


18. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following is a roll-forward of the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the years ended April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015:
(In thousands) Foreign currency Defined benefit plans Net Unrealized Gain/loss on Derivatives Total
Balance as of March 29, 2014 $3,198
 $(4,592) $2,804
 $1,410
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (23,710) (4,410) 11,371
 (16,749)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 
 79
 (6,464) (6,385)
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income (23,710) (4,331) 4,907
 (23,134)
Balance as of March 28, 2015 $(20,512) $(8,923) $7,711
 $(21,724)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (1,987) 884
 (3,938) (5,041)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss 
 547
 (8,822) (8,275)
Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income (1,987) 1,431
 (12,760) (13,316)
Balance as of April 2, 2016 $(22,499) $(7,492) $(5,049) $(35,040)

The details about the amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended April 2, 2016 and March 28, 2015 are as follows:
(In thousands) Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
Affected Line in the
Statement of (Loss) Income
Derivative instruments reclassified to income statement Year ended April 2, 2016 Year ended March 28, 2015  
Realized net gain on derivatives $8,654
 $6,736
 Net revenues, cost of goods sold, other expense, net
Income tax effect 168
 (272) Provision for income taxes
Net of taxes $8,822
 $6,464
  
       
Pension items reclassified to income statement      
Realized net loss on pension assets $602
 $123
 Other expense, net
Income tax effect (55) (44) Provision for income taxes
Net of taxes $547
 $79
  

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

77

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Haemonetics Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 30, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries at March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 30, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of March 30, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated May 20, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 20, 2013

78

Table of Contents

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There has been no changedue to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,for income taxes described below, our internal control over financial reporting.

We acquired Pall Corporation's transfusion medicine business on August 1, 2012. We have extended our oversightdisclosure controls and monitoring processes that support our internal control over financial reporting to include the acquired operations. We are continuing to integrate the acquired operations into our overall internal control over financial reporting process. We will assess the effectivenessprocedures were not effective as of internal control over financial reporting for the acquired whole blood business in fiscal 2014. Management's assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for fiscal 2013 did not include the internal controls of the whole blood business.April 2, 2016.
Reports on Internal Control
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-a5(f). The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of March 30, 2013.April 2, 2016. In making this assessment, the management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The Company's assessment did not include an assessment of the internal controls over financial reporting of the whole blood business acquired in August 2013, which is included in our fiscal 2013 consolidated financial statements and which constituted $138.0 million of revenues for this period.Framework (2013 framework). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of March 30, 2013, the Company’sCompany's management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the accounting for income taxes. This weakness stemmed from issues associated with the transition from utilizing tax consultants to establishing expanded in-house tax capabilities and resources, as well as issues in the design and implementation of controls to review and analyze the Company's income tax provisions, income taxes payable and receivable, and deferred income tax balances. We are continuing to build our tax accounting resources and are implementing reconciliations and review processes in response to this weakness. We are developing and implementing new control processes and procedures to address this weakness and also to ensure that we become compliant with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as required.
We are undertaking steps to strengthen our controls over accounting for income taxes, including:
Increasing oversight by our management in the calculation and reporting of certain tax balances of our non-U.S. operations;
Enhancing policies and procedures relating to account reconciliation and analysis;
Augmenting our tax accounting resources;
Increasing communication to information providers for tax jurisdiction specific information; and
Strengthening communication and information flows between the tax department and the controllers group.
The control deficiencies described above resulted in certain material and immaterial misstatements in the preliminary financial statement accounts that were corrected prior to the issuance of the annual consolidated financial statements. The control deficiencies create a possibility that a material misstatement to our consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, and therefore we concluded that the deficiencies represent a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting for income taxes is not effective based on those criteria.as of April 2, 2016.
Our material weakness in controls over accounting for income taxes will not be considered remediated until new internal controls are operational for a period of time and are tested, and management and our independent registered public accounting firm conclude that these controls are operating effectively.

Ernst & Young, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report, in which they expressed an unqualifiedadverse opinion, is included below.

Changes in Internal Controls
79

TableOther than the identification of Contentsthe material weakness described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and StockholdersShareholders of Haemonetics Corporation:Corporation

We have audited Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), (the COSO criteria). The Company'sHaemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management's assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, did not include an assessmentsuch that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the internal controls of the whole blood business, which iscompany’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in the fiscal 2013 consolidated financial statements of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries and constituted $138 million of revenue for this period. Our audit ofmanagement’s assessment. Management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting relating to the accounting for income taxes, stemming from issues in the design and implementation of Haemonetics Corporationcontrols to review and subsidiaries also did not include an evaluation ofanalyze the internal control over financial reporting of the whole blood business.
In our opinion, Haemonetics CorporationCompany's income tax provisions, income taxes payable and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 30, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
receivable, and deferred income tax balances. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of (loss) income, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 30, 2013April 2, 2016. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2016 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated June 1, 2016, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Haemonetics Corporation and subsidiaries and our report dated May 20, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 2, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 20, 2013June 1, 2016









80



Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

We acquired Pall Corporation's transfusion medicine business on August 1, 2012. We have extended our oversight and monitoring processes that support our internal control over financial reporting to include the acquired operations. We are continuing to integrate the acquired operations into our overall internal control over financial reporting process. We will assess the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the acquired whole blood business in fiscal 2014.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
1. The information called for by Item 401 of Regulations S-K concerning our directors and the information called for by Item 405 of Regulation S-K concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016.
2. The information concerning our Executive Officers is set forth at the end of Part I hereof.
3. The balance of the information required by this item, including information concerning our Audit Committee and the Audit Committee Financial Expert and compliance with Item 407(c)(3) of S-K, is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016. We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and senior financial officers. The Code of Ethics is incorporated into the Company’s Code of Business Conduct located on the Company’s internet web site at http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=72118&p=irol-IRHome and it is available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Such requests should be directed to our Company’s Secretary.
We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics that applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or senior financial officers and that relates to any element of the Code of Ethics definition enumerated in Item 406 of Regulation S-K by posting such information on our website. Pursuant to NYSE Rule 303A.10, as amended, any waiver of the code of ethics for any executive officer or director must be disclosed within four business days by a press release, SEC Form 8-K, or internet posting.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee Report included within the Proxy Statement is only being “furnished” hereunder and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016.
Stock Plans
The following table below sets forth information as of March 30, 2013 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.

81


  (a) (b) (c)
Plan Category 
 Number of Securities to be
Issued upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
 
Number of Securities
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a)*
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 4,426,177
 $30.19
 7,283,971
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 4,426,177
 $30.19
 7,283,971

*Includes 687,776 shares available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan in future purchase periods.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPEDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held July 24, 2013.21, 2016.


82


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
A)Financial Statements are included in Part II of this report
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not required.
B)Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning at page 86,91, which is incorporated herein by reference.




83



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
   
 By: /s/ Brian ConcannonRonald Gelbman
  Brian Concannon,Ronald Gelbman
  President and Chief Executive OfficerDirector
Date : May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Brian ConcannonRonald Gelbman President, Chief Executive Officer and Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Brian ConcannonRonald Gelbman (Principal Executive Officer)Officer at April 2, 2016)  
     
/s/ Christopher Lindop Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Christopher Lindop (Principal Financial Officer)  
     
/s/ Susan HanlonDan Goldstein Vice President, FinanceCorporate Controller May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Susan HanlonDan Goldstein (Principal Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Lawrence BestCharles Dockendorff Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Lawrence Best
/s/  Paul BlackDirectorMay 20, 2013
Paul BlackCharles Dockendorff    
     
/s/ Susan Bartlett Foote Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Susan Bartlett Foote
/s/  Ronald GelbmanDirectorMay 20, 2013
Ronald Gelbman    
     
/s/ Pedro Granadillo Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Pedro Granadillo    
     
/s/ Mark Kroll Ph.D. Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Mark Kroll    
     
/s/ Richard Meelia Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Richard Meelia    
     
/s/ Ronald Merriman Director May 20, 2013June 1, 2016
Ronald Merriman    

84


EXHIBITS FILED WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Number and Description of Exhibit
1.  Articles of Organization
3A* Pro forma Amended and Restated Articles of Organization of the Company reflecting Articles of Amendment dated August 23, 1993 and August 21, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended December 29, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
3B* 
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Organization of the Company filed August 21, 2006 with the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.


3C*
By-Laws of the Company, as amended through July 27, 2012January 21, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 5.0399.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed August 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)dated January 27, 2015).

2.  Instruments definingDefining the rightsRights of security holdersSecurity Holders
4A* 
Specimen certificate for shares of common stock (filed as Exhibit 4B to the Company's Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 No. 33-39490 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.  Material Contracts
10A* 
Lease dated July 17, 1990 between the Buncher Company and the Company of property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed as Exhibit 10K10-K to the Company's Form S-1 No. 33-39490 and incorporated herein by reference).

10B* 
First Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of July 17, 1996 between Buncher Company and the Company of property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed as Exhibit 10AI to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended December 28, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference).

10C* 
Second Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of October 18, 2000 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed as Exhibit 10AG to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-10730 for the year ended March 29, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference).

10D10D* 
Third Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of March 23, 2004 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10D to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10E10E* 
Fourth Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of March 12, 2008 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10E to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).



10F10F* 
Fifth Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of October 1, 2008 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10F to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10G10G* 
Sixth Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990 made as of January 8, 2010 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10G to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10H10H* 
Seventh Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of March 31, 2011 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10H to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10I10I* 
Eighth Amendment to lease dated July 17, 1990, made as of February 26, 2013 between Buncher Company and the Company for the property in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (filed herewith as Exhibit 10I to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10J10J* 
Lease dated February 21, 2000 between BBVA Bancomer Servicios, S.A., as Trustee of the “Submetropoli de Tijuana” Trust and Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor in interest to Ensatec, S.A. de C.V. with authorization of El Florido California, S.A. de C.V., for property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10J to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10K10K* 
Amendment to Lease dated February 21, 2000 made as of July 25, 2008 between BBVA Bancomer Servicios, S.A., as Trustee of the “Submetropoli de Tijuana” Trust Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor in interest to Ensatec, S.A. de C.V., for property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10K to the Company's Form 10-K No 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).


85


10L10L* 
Extension to Lease dated February 21, 2000, made as of August 14, 2011 between PROCADEF 1, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor in interest to Ensatec, S.A. de C.V., for property located in Tijuana, Mexico (Spanish to English translation filed herewith as Exhibit 10L to the Company's Form 10-K No 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10M
10M* 
Amendment Letter to Lease dated February 21, 2000, made as of August 14, 2011 between BBVA Bancomer Servicios, S.A., as Trustee of the “Submetropoli de Tijuana” Trust and Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor in interest to Ensatec, S.A. de C.V., for property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10M to the Company's Form 10-K No 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10N10N* 
Notice of Assignment to Lease dated February 21, 2000, made as of February 23, 2012 between BBVA Bancomer Servicios, S.A., as Trustee of the “Submetropoli de Tijuana” Trust and Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor in interest to Ensatec, S.A. de C.V. for property located in Tijuana, Mexico (Spanish to English translation filed herewith as Exhibit 10N to the Company's Form 10-K No 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10O* 
Note and Mortgage dated December 12, 2000 between the Company and General Electric Capital Business Asset Funding Corporation relating to the Braintree facility (filed as Exhibit 10B to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended December 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference).

10P
Real Estate Lease Agreement dated November 2, 2002 between Haemonetics Produzione Italia S.r.l. as successor in interest to Pall Italia S.r.l and Tempera Infissi S.r.l for premises located in Ascoli, Italy (Italian to English translation filed herewith as Exhibit 10P to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10Q
Lease effective July 15, 2004 between Howard Commons Associates, LLC and Haemoscope Corporation for the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10Q to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10R
First Amendment to Lease dated July 15, 2004, made as of June 10, 2004 between Howard Commons Associates, LLC and Haemoscope Corporation for the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10R to the Company's10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10S
Second Amendment to Lease dated July 15, 2004, made as of June 5, 2007 between Cabot II - ILI W02-W03, LLC, predecessor-in interest to Howard Commons Associates, LLC and Haemoscope Corporation for the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10S to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10T
Third Amendment to Lease dated July 15, 2004, made as of November 19, 2007 between Cabot II - ILI W02-W03, LLC, Haemoscope Corporation and Huron Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as successor in interest to Haemoscope Corporation for the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10T to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10U
Fourth Amendment to Lease dated July 15, 2004, made as of December 22, 2010 between Cabot II - ILI W02-W03, LLC, Haemoscope Corporation and the Company as assignee and New Tenant of the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10U to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10V
Fifth Amendment to Lease dated July 15, 2004, made as of July 24, 2012 between Cabot II - ILI W02-W03, LLC and the Company of the property located in Niles, Illinois (filed herewith as Exhibit 10V to the Company's10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).

10W
Lease Agreement effective December 3, 2007 between Mrs. Blanca Estela Colunga Santelices, by her own right, and Pall Life Sciences Mexico, S.de R.L. de C.V., for the property located in Tijuana, Mexico (Spanish to English translation filed herewith as Exhibit 10W to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10X10P* 
Assignment to Lease Agreement effective December 3, 2007, made as of December 2, 2011 between Mrs. Blanca Estela Colunga Santelices, by her own right, Pall Life Sciences Mexico, S.de R.L. de C.V., (“Assignor”) and Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V.as successor in interest to Pall Mexico Manufacturing S. de R.L. de C.V., (“Assignee”) assigned in favor of the property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10X to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10Y10Q* 
Sublease Contract to Lease Agreement effective December 3, 2007, made as of December 3, 2011 between Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V. as successor in interest to Pall Mexico Manufacturing, S.de R.L. de C.V., and Pall Life Sciences Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., for the property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10Y to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10Z10R* 
Sublease Contract to Lease Agreement effective December 3, 2007, made as of February 23, 2012 between Haemonetics Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V. as successor in interest to Pall Mexico Manufacturing S. de R.L. de C.V. and Ensatec, S.A. de C.V., for the property located in Tijuana, Mexico (filed herewith as Exhibit 10Z to the Company's Form 10-K No.1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013)2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AA10S* 
Lease dated August 20, 2009 between Price Logistics Center Draper One, LLC and the Company for property located in Draper, Utah. (filed herewith as Exhibit 10AA to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the year ended March 30, 2013).


86


10AB*†

Haemonetics Corporation 2000 Long-term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10A to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended December 30, 20002013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AC*†

10T*
 
FormLease dated September 19, 2013 between the Penang Development Corporation ("Lessor") and Haemonetics Malaysia Sdn Bhd ("Lessee") of Option Agreement for Non-Qualified stock options for the 2000 Long Term-Incentive Plan for Employeesproperty located in Penang, Malaysia (filed as Exhibit 10AJ10D to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-1073010-Q for the yearquarter ended March 29, 2003June 28, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AD*10U* 
Form of Option Agreements for Non-Qualified stock options for the 2000 Long- Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 10AK to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-10730 for the year ended March 29, 2003).

10AE†
Pro Forma Haemonetics Corporation 2005 Long TermLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, reflecting amendments dated July 31, 2008, July 29, 2009, July 21, 2011, and November 30, 2012, July 24, 2013 and January 21, 2014 (filed herewith)as Exhibit 10AE to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AF*10V*

 
Form of Option Agreement for Non-Qualified stock options for the 2005 Long Term-Incentive Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended October 1, 2005)2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AG*10W*† 
Form of Option Agreement for Non-Qualified stock options for the 2005 Long TermLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Employees.

(filed as Exhibit 10S to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10AH*10X*

 
Form of Option Agreement for Non-Qualified stock options for the 2005 Long Term-IncentiveLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for the Chief Executive Officer (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended October 1, 2005)2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AI*

10Y*†
 
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement with Employees under 2005 Long TermLong-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.

(filed as Exhibit 10U to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended April 3, 20`0 and incorporated herein by reference).
10AJ*10Z*

 
Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement made effective on April 2, 2009 between the Company and Brian Concannon (filed as Exhibit 10Y to the Company's Form 10-Q No. 1-10730 for the quarter ended June 27, 2009)2009 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AK†

10AA*†
 
Form of Market Stock Unit Agreement for the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's 8-K, dated July 26, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10AB*†Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement (filed herewith)as exhibit 10AK to the Company's Form 10-K, for the year-ended March 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AL*10AC*

 
2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (filed as Exhibit 10AS to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AM†

10AD*† 
Pro Forma Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan made effectiveas amended and restated on July 24, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10B to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2012 (filed herewith)2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

10AN*

10AO*
 
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2012, by and between Haemonetics Corporation and Pall Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10Z to the Company's Form 10-K No. 1-14041 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012)2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

4. Subsidiary Certifications and Consents
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1 Consent of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon,Christopher Simon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

31.2 
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerBusiness Development of the Company.

32.1 
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon,Christopher Simon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

Company.
32.2 
Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Business Development of the Company

Company.
101ˆ
101ˆ
 
The following materials from Haemonetics Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013,April 2, 2016, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, and Other Comprehensive Income, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

*Incorporated by reference
Agreement, plan, or arrangement related to the compensation of officers or directors
ˆ
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Form 10-K is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.




87


SCHEDULE II
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)Balance at
Beginning of
Fiscal Year
 Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 Write-Offs
(Net of Recoveries)
 Balance at End
of Fiscal Year
Balance at
Beginning of
Fiscal Year
 Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 Write-Offs
(Net of Recoveries)
 Balance at End
of Fiscal Year
For Year Ended March 30, 2013 
  
  
  
For Year Ended April 2, 2016 
  
  
  
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$1,480
 $446
 $(199) $1,727
$1,749
 $728
 $(224) $2,253
For Year Ended March 31, 2012 
  
  
  
For Year Ended March 28, 2015 
  
  
  
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$1,799
 $(39) $(280) $1,480
$1,676
 $399
 $(326) $1,749
For Year Ended April 2, 2011 
  
  
  
For Year Ended March 29, 2014 
  
  
  
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts$2,554
 $343
 $(1,098) $1,799
$1,727
 $186
 $(237) $1,676


88102