SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
________________________
FORM 10-K
________________________
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 20152018
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-8597001-08597
________________________
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________
Delaware94-2657368
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6140 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 590
 Pleasanton, California
94588
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(925) 460-3600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.10 par value, and
associated rights
 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    
Yes  x No  o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    
Yes  o     No   x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    
Yes  x    No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).Act.
Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer o  Non-accelerated filer o  Smaller reporting company o 
(DoEmerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not check if a smaller reporting company)to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x

On November 30, 2015,2018, there were 47,948,69648,938,208 shares of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates with aggregate market value of $8.6$11.3 billion on April 30, 2015,2018, the last day of the registrant's most recently completed fiscal second quarter.
Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, as of November 30, 2015: 48,274,9262018: 49,232,061
Documents Incorporated by Reference: 
Document  Part of Form 10-K
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders scheduled to be held in March 20162019
  Part III





THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 20152018

Table of Contents
PART I Page
Item 1.Business
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II  
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
PART III  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV  
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

2


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


PART I

Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1934 and1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements relating to plans, prospects, goals, strategies, future actions, events or performance and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact, including all statements regarding acquisitions including the acquired companies' financial position, market position, product development and business strategy, expected cost synergies, expectingexpected timing and benefits of the transaction, difficulties in integrating entities or operations, as well as estimates of our and the acquired entities' future expenses, sales and earnings per share are forward-looking. In addition, all statements regarding anticipated growth in our revenue, anticipated effects of any product recalls, anticipated market conditions, planned product launches and expected results of operations and integration of any acquisition are forward-looking. To identify these statements look for words like “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or “anticipates” and similar words or phrases. Forward-looking statements necessarily depend on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause our actual results and future actions to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements are:

Adverse changes in the global or regional general business, political and economic conditions, including the impact of continuing uncertainty and instability of certain countries that could adversely affect our global markets.markets, and the potential adverse economic impact and related uncertainty caused by these items, including but not limited to, the United Kingdom’s election to withdraw from the European Union and escalating global trade barriers including additional tariffs.

Foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations including the risk of fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies or interest rates that would decrease our revenues and earnings.

Changes in tax laws or their interpretation and changes in statutory tax rates, including but not limited to, the U.S., the United Kingdom and other countries with proposed changes to tax laws, some of which may affect our taxation of earnings recognized in foreign jurisdictions and/or negatively impact our effective tax rate.

Our existing indebtedness and associated interest expense, most of which is variable and impacted by rate increases, which could adversely affect our financial health or limit our ability to borrow additional funds.

Acquisition-related adverse effects including the failure to successfully obtain the anticipated revenues, margins and earnings benefits of acquisitions, including the Sauflon acquisition; integration delays or costs and the requirement to record significant adjustments to the preliminary fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed within the measurement period, required regulatory approvals for an acquisition not being obtained or being delayed or subject to conditions that are not anticipated, adverse impacts of changes to accounting controls and reporting procedures, contingent liabilities or indemnification obligations, increased leverage and lack of access to available financing (including financing for the acquisition or refinancing of debt owed by us on a timely basis and on reasonable terms).


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Compliance costs and potential liability in connection with U.S. and foreign laws and health care regulations pertaining to privacy and security of third- party information, such as HIPAA in the U.S. and the General Data Protection Regulation requirements which took effect in Europe on May 25, 2018, including but not limited to those resulting from data security breaches.

A major disruption in the operations of our manufacturing, accounting and financial reporting, research and development, distribution facilities or raw material supply chain due to integration of acquisitions, natural disasters or other causes.

A major disruption in the operations of our manufacturing, accounting and financial reporting, research and development or distribution facilities due to technological problems, including any related to our information systems maintenance, enhancements or new system deployments, and integrations integration of acquisitions, natural disasters or other causes.upgrades.

Disruptions in supplies of raw materials, particularly components used to manufacture our silicone hydrogel lenses.

New U.S. and foreign government laws and regulations, and changes in existing laws, regulations and enforcement guidance, which affect areas of our operations including, but not limited to, those affecting the health care industry, including the contact lens industry specifically orand the medical device and the healthcareor pharmaceutical industries generally.
Compliance costs and potential liability in connection with U.S. and foreign healthcare regulations, including product recalls, warning letters and potential losses resulting from sales of counterfeit and other infringing products.

3


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Legal costs, insurance expenses, settlement costs and the risk of an adverse decision, prohibitive injunction or settlement related to product liability, patent infringement or other litigation.
Changes in tax laws or their interpretation and changes in statutory tax rates.
Limitations on sales following product introductions due to poor market acceptance.

New competitors, product innovations or technologies.technologies, including but not limited to, technological advances by competitors, new products and patents attained by competitors, and competitors' expansion through acquisitions.

Reduced sales, loss of customers and costs and expenses related to recalls.product recalls and warning letters.

Failure to receive, or delays in receiving, U.S. or foreign regulatory approvals for products.

Failure of our customers and end users to obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement from third partythird-party payors for our products.products and services.

The requirement to provide for a significant liability or to write off, or accelerate depreciation on, a significant asset, including goodwill.goodwill and idle manufacturing facilities and equipment.

The success of our research and development activities and other start-up projects.

Dilution to earnings per share from the Sauflon acquisition or other acquisitions or issuing stock.
Changes
Impact and costs incurred from changes in accounting principles or estimates.standards and policies.

Environmental risks.risks, including increasing environmental legislation and the broader impacts of climate change.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Other events described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the “Business” and “Risk Factors” sections in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015,2018, as such Risk Factors may be updated in quarterly filings.
We caution investors that forward-looking statements reflect our analysis only on their stated date. We disclaim any intent to update them except as required by law.

4


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 1. Business.
 
The Cooper Companies, Inc. (Cooper, we or the Company), a Delaware corporation organized in 1980, is a global medical device company publicly traded on the NYSE Euronext (NYSE: COO). Cooper is dedicated to being A Quality of Life CompanyTM with a focus on shareholder value.. Cooper operates through two business units, CooperVision Inc. and CooperSurgical, Inc.CooperSurgical.
 
CooperVision is a global manufacturer providing products for contact lens wearers. CooperVision develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of single-use, two-week and monthly contact lenses, featuring advanced materials and optics. CooperVision'sCooperVision designs its products are designed to solve vision challenges such as astigmatism, presbyopia, myopia, ocular dryness and ocular dryness;eye fatigues; with a broad collection of spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses. Recent acquisitions also expanded CooperVision's access to myopia management markets with new products, such as orthokeratology (ortho-k) specialty lenses. CooperVision's contact lenses are offered in a variety of materials including silicone hydrogel Aquaform® technology and phosphorylcholine technology (PC) Technology™. CooperVision primarily manufacturedmanufactures its products at its facilities located in Hampshire,the United Kingdom, Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico, Budapest, Hungary, Costa Rica and Scottsville, New York.the United States. CooperVision distributes products from West Henrietta, New York, Fareham,out of its facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Liege, Belgium and various smaller international distribution facilities.

CooperSurgical focusesCooperSurgical's business competes in the general health care market with a focus on supplying women'sadvancing the health clinicians withof women, babies and families through a diversified portfolio of products and treatment options to improve the delivery of healthcare to women. CooperSurgical's primary objectives include internal growthservices including medical devices, fertility, genomics, diagnostics, and growth through acquisitions to expandcontraception. CooperSurgical has established its core businessesmarket presence and the introduction of advanced technology-baseddistribution system by developing products to aid clinicians in the management and treatment of commonly seen conditions.acquiring companies, products and services that complement its business model. We categorize CooperSurgical customers are healthcare professionals and institutions providing care to and for women. CooperSurgical products supportproduct sales based on the point of healthcarehealth care delivery, which includes products used in the hospital, clinician'smedical office and surgical procedures, primarily by obstetricians and gynecologists (ob/gyns); and fertility clinics.products/equipment and genetic testing services used primarily in fertility clinics and laboratories. CooperSurgical's major manufacturing and distribution facilities are located in Trumbull, Connecticut, Malov,Texas, New York, Denmark, Pasadena, California, Stafford, Texas,Costa Rica, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Berlin, Germany.various smaller international locations, with diagnostic facilities located in multiple locations in the United States and internationally in Canada and the United Kingdom. CooperSurgical purchased a manufacturing facility in Costa Rica in November 2017 to consolidate a portion of global manufacturing and is also currently shifting its primary distribution facility from Denmark to Venlo, Netherlands.

CooperVision and CooperSurgical each operate in highly competitive environments. Competition in the medical device industry is dynamic and involves the search for technological and therapeutic innovations. Both of Cooper's businesses compete primarilypredominantly on the basis of product quality and differentiation, technological benefit, service and reliability.
 
COOPERVISION
 
CooperVision competes in the worldwide soft contact lens market and services three primary regions: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific. The contact lens market has two major product categories:

Spherical lenses including lenses that correct near- and farsightedness uncomplicated by more complex visual defects.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Toric and multifocal lenses including lenses that, in addition to correcting near- and farsightedness, address more complex visual defects such as astigmatism and presbyopia by adding optical properties of cylinder and axis, which correct for irregularities in the shape of the cornea.

In order to achieve comfortable and healthy contact lens wear, products are sold with recommended replacement schedules, often defined as modalities, with the primary modalities being single-use lenses and frequently replaced lenses, which are designed for two-week and monthly.monthly replacement.

CooperVision offers spherical, aspherical, toric, multifocal and toric multifocal lens products in most modalities. We believe that in order to compete successfully in the numerous nichescategories of the contact lens market, companies must offer differentiated products that are priced competitively and manufactured

5


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


efficiently. CooperVision believes that it is the only contact lens manufacturer to use three different manufacturing processes to produce its lenses: lathing, cast molding and FIPS™, a cost-effective combination of lathing and molding. The clariti® manufacturing platform may continue to add greater flexibility to the manufacture of our product offerings. We believe that this manufacturing flexibility allows CooperVision to compete in its markets by:

Producing high, medium and low volumes of lenses made with a variety of materials for a broader range of market niches: single-use, two-week, monthly and quarterly disposable sphere, toric and multifocal lenses and custom toric lenses for patients with a high degree of astigmatism.

Offering a wide range of lens parameters, leading to a higher rate of successful fitting for practitioners and better visual acuity for patients.
Significantly, the market for spherical lenses is growing with the addition of new value-added products, such as spherical lenses to alleviate dry eye symptoms, reduce eye fatigue from use of digital devices and add aspherical optical properties and/or higher oxygen permeable lenses such as silicone hydrogels.

Sales of contact lenses utilizing silicone hydrogel materials continue to grow and this product material represents about half of the industry.grow. Silicone hydrogel materials supply a higher level of oxygen to the cornea, as measured by the transmissibility of oxygen through a given thickness of material, or “dk/t,” than traditional hydrogel lenses. We believe our ability to compete successfully with a full range of silicone hydrogel products is an important factor to achieving success in our business. Silicone hydrogel lenses now represent a significant portion of CooperVision's contact lens sales and our Biofinity® brand is CooperVision's leading product line. Under the Biofinity® brand, CooperVision markets monthly silicone hydrogel spherical, toric and multifocal lens products.
CooperVision markets single-use silicone hydrogel with a complete line of spherical, toric and multifocal lenses under our clariti® 1day brand and a single-use silicone hydrogel spherical lensand toric lenses under our MyDay® brand. We also compete in the traditional hydrogel single-use product segment with several lenses including our Proclear®. 1 Day lenses. We believe that the global market for single-use contact lenses will continue to grow and that our competitive silicone hydrogel single-use lens productsand traditional hydrogel product offerings represent an opportunity for our business.

We compete with clariti and MyDay, our single-usemanufacture silicone hydrogel lenses, and our Proclear 1 Day products. Our clariti 1dayBiofinity brand provides the only single-use silicone hydrogel lenses in the marketplace with a complete line of spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses.

CooperVision's Proclear line oflenses, Avaira Vitality brand spherical and toric lenses and multifocalMyDay brand spherical and toric lenses are manufactured with omafilcon, a material that incorporates Phosphorylcholine (PC) Technology™ that helps enhance tissue-device compatibility. Mild discomfort relatingusing proprietary Aquaform technology to dryness during lens wear is a condition that often causes patients to discontinue contact lens wear and Proclear lenses are the only lenses with FDA clearanceincrease oxygen transmissibility for the claim "… may provide improved comfort for contact lens wearers who experience mild discomfort or symptoms relating to dryness during lenslonger wear."

In addition to its PC Technology™ and silicone hydrogel product offerings, CooperVision competes in the contact lens market with ourother traditional hydrogel products.

Contact Lens Product Sales

Spheres: Net salesCooperVision believes that our key accounts which include optical chains, global retailers, certain buying groups and mass merchandisers are growing faster than the overall market and are expected to have a sustainable long-term growth trend. We are focused on supporting the growth of CooperVision's spherical lenses represented 55 percent of CooperVision's net sales in fiscal 2015 including net sales of single-use spherical lens that represented 24 percent of net sales in the fiscal year.all our customers by

Toric and Multifocal: Net sales of CooperVision's toric lenses represented 30 percent of CooperVision's net sales in fiscal 2015. Net sales of multifocal lenses represented 11 percent of net sales in the fiscal year.

Proclear: Net sales of CooperVision's PC Technology spherical, toric and multifocal products, including Proclear 1 Day sphere and multifocal products, represented 21 percent of CooperVision's net sales in fiscal 2015.

6


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Silicone Hydrogel: CooperVision's silicone hydrogel spherical, toricinvesting in selling, promotional and multifocaladvertising activities. Further, we are increasing investment in our distribution and packaging capabilities to support the growth of our business and to continue to provide quality service with our industry leading SKU range and customized offerings.

CooperVision is focused on greater worldwide market penetration of recently introduced products, and we continue to expand our presence in existing and emerging markets, including through acquisitions. In fiscal 2018, CooperVision acquired Paragon Vision services, a leading provider of ortho-k, specialty contact lenses and oxygen permeable rigid contact lens material, and Blueyes Ltd. (Blueyes), a long-standing distribution partner, with a leading position in the distribution of contact lenses to the Optical and Pharmacy sector in Israel. In fiscal 2017, we acquired Procornea Holding B.V. (Procornea), a Netherlands based manufacturer of specialty contact lenses, which expands CooperVision’s access to myopia (nearsightedness) management markets with new products, including clariti and MyDay products, represented 55 percentGrand Vista LLC, a distributor in Russia of CooperVision's net sales in fiscal 2015.soft contact lenses.

Contact Lens Product Sales
chart-48186ffefbcefd3a640a02.jpg
CooperVision Competition

The contact lens market is highly competitive. CooperVision's three largest competitors in the worldwide market and its primary competitors in the spherical, toric and multifocal lens categories of that market are Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Bausch Health Companies Inc. and Alcon (formerly CIBA Vision Corporation) owned by Novartis AG and Bausch & Lomb Incorporated owned by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Over the past decade, the contact lens industry has experienced a global shift toward silicone hydrogel lenses that now represent approximately 50% of the global contact lens market. CooperVision competes in the silicone hydrogel segment of the market with our Biofinity monthly spherical, toric and multifocal lenses, Avaira® two-week spherical and toric lenses, clariti 1day brand of single-use sphere, toric and multifocal lenses, and MyDay single-use spherical lenses. The clariti 1day and MyDay brands of single-use contact lenses provides CooperVision with the broadest product portfolio in the single-use silicone hydrogel market.

In the toric lens market, a similar shift toward silicone hydrogel lenses has occurred, but we believe that lens manufacturers also continue to compete to provide the highest possible level of visual acuity and patient satisfaction by offering a wide range of lens parameters, superior wearing comfort and a high level of customer service, both for patients and contact lens practitioners. CooperVision competes based on the fact that its three manufacturing processes, including the clariti manufacturing platform recently acquired with Sauflon, allows a broad range of toric lens parameters, which we believe provides wide choices for patient and practitioner and a high level of visual acuity. We also compete based on our customer and professional services.AG.

CooperVision's primary competitors in the contact lens businessmay have greater financial resources, larger research and development budgets, larger sales forces, greater market penetration and/or larger manufacturing volumes. CooperVision seeks to offer a high level of customer service through its direct sales organizations around the world and through telephone sales and technical service representatives who consult with eye care professionals about the use of our lens products.

CooperVision also competes with manufacturers of eyeglasses and with refractive surgical procedures that correct visual defects.defects including laser vision correction. CooperVision believes that there are opportunities for contact lenses to gain market share, particularly in markets where the penetration of contact lenses in the vision correction market is low. CooperVision also believes that laser vision correction is not a significant threat to its sales of contact lenses based on the growth of the contact lens market over the past decade.

CooperVision competes in the silicone hydrogel segment of the market with its following products: Biofinity monthly spherical, toric and multifocal lenses; Avaira VitalityTM two-week spherical and toric

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


lenses; clariti 1day brand of single-use sphere, toric and multifocal lenses; and MyDay single-use spherical and toric lenses. The clariti 1day and MyDay brands of single-use contact lenses provide CooperVision with the broadest product portfolio in the single-use silicone hydrogel market.

In addition to a broad offering of silicone hydrogel lenses, CooperVision competes based on the fact that its three manufacturing processes allow CooperVision to produce a broad range of spheres, toric and multifocal lens parameters, which we believe provides wide choices for patient and practitioner and a high level of visual acuity. We also compete based on our customer and professional services. CooperVision believes that there are opportunities for contact lenses to gain market share, particularly in markets where the penetration of contact lenses in the vision correction market is low.

COOPERSURGICAL

CooperSurgical offers a broad array of products used inand services focused on advancing the carehealth of women, babies and treatmentfamilies through a diversified portfolio of women.products and services including medical devices, fertility, genomics, diagnostics and contraception. The Company participates in the women's healthcare market seeking to offeroffers quality products, innovative technologies and superior serviceservices to clinicians and patients worldwide. CooperSurgical collaborates with clinicians to identify products and new technologies from disposable products to diagnostic tests to sophisticated instruments and equipment.equipment, to bring new products to market. The result is a broad portfolio of products and services that are intended to aid in the delivery of improved clinical outcomes that healthcarehealth care professionals use routinely in the diagnosis and treatment of a wide spectrum of family and women's health and reproductive issues.


7


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Since its inception in 1990, CooperSurgical has established its market presence and distribution system by developing products and acquiring products and companies that complement its business model.

CooperSurgical competes in the global in-vitro fertilization (IVF) market with a product portfolio of IVF media and assisted reproductive technology solutions including genetic testing designed to enhance the work of fertility professionals to the benefit of families. For the IVF market, CooperSurgical is focused on the objectives of internal growthwomen, babies and growthfamilies.

We have continued to invest in CooperSurgical's business through acquisitions. In August 2015, CooperSurgical expanded its presence in the fertility market with the acquisition of Reprogenetics, a genetics laboratory specializing in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)companies and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) used duringproduct lines for new or complementary products and services for the IVF process.process and within the ob/gyn space.

In fiscal 2018, we acquired the assets of the PARAGARD Intrauterine Device (IUD) business (PARAGARD) from Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited (Teva). This acquisition broadens and strengthens CooperSurgical's current women's health product portfolio in office and surgical procedures. PARAGARD® is the only hormone-free, long lasting, reversible contraceptive option approved by FDA available in the United States, and IUDs represent a large and growing segment of the contraceptive market. We also acquired in fiscal 2018, The LifeGlobal Group (LifeGlobal) which was a privately held company that specializes primarily in the IVF media marketplace. In fiscal 2017, we acquired Wallace, the IVF segment of Smiths Medical International Ltd. We intend to continue investing in CooperSurgical's business with the goal of expanding our integrated solutions model within the areas of family health, fertility and diagnostics.

Market for Women's Healthcareand Family Reproductive Health Care

CooperSurgical participates in the market for women's healthcarefamily health care with its diversified product lines in three major categories based on the point of healthcarehealth care delivery: hospitals and surgical centers, obstetriciansobstetricians' and gynecologistsgynecologists' (ob/gyns) medical offices and fertility clinics.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



CooperSurgical expects patient visits to ob/gyns in the United States to increase over the next decade. Office visit activity related to menopause, abnormal bleeding, incontinence and osteoporosis, are expected to increase slightly over the next decade. Driving thisthe growth is a growing population of women over the age of 65 (according to the United States Census estimates), a large and stable middle-aged population, and a steady number of reproductive age women with increasing fertility issues a large and stable middle-aged population and a growing population ofas well as women overinterested in contraception that is reversible such as with the age of 65 according to United States Census estimates.PARAGARD® IUD. CooperSurgical expects growth in fertility treatments as more women choose to delay childbearing to the mid-thirties and beyond. Office visit activity related to menopause, including abnormal bleeding, incontinence and osteoporosis, are also expected to increase slightly over the next decade. CooperSurgical believes that past trends reflected women visiting clinicians primarily during their reproductive years. With new treatment options now available and a more educated population, CooperSurgical expects the relationship between the patient and clinician will continue into the middle years and later.

Another trend in the market for women's healthcarehealth care includes the migration of ob/gyn clinicians away from private practice ownership and toward aligning with group practices or employment with hospitals and healthcarehealth care systems. This trend includes the increasing influence of supply chain controls, such as value analysis committees, on product evaluation and procurement. CooperSurgical believes that the market factors that are driving this trend will continue in the near term. We believe our broad product portfolio can be a benefit in this changing environment as health systems look to standardize and consolidate vendors.

The responseRecent trends in the United States market to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (Affordable Care Act or ACA) includesinclude the development of new models of healthcare delivery. One goal of these new models is to deliver more cost-effective healthcarehealth care delivery models, including a trend to movemoving treatment out of hospitals and surgery centers and into the office setting without compromising care. We expect this trend to continue in the near term.continue.

While general medical practitioners play an important role in women's primary care, the ob/gyn specialist is the primary market for our medical devices.

Some significant features of this market are:

Patient visits are for annual checkups, cancer screening, menstrual disorders, vaginitis (inflammation of vaginal tissue), treatment of abnormal Pap smears, osteoporosis (reduction in bone mass) and the management of menopause, pregnancy and reproductive management.

We believe that approximately one-third of the office visits to ob/gyns are patients seeking diagnosis and treatment for the symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding.

8


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESA high proportion of office visits are for contraceptive management.



Ob/gyns traditionally provide the initial evaluation for women and their partners who seek infertility assistance. Ovulatory drugs and intrauterine insemination (IUI) are common treatments in these cases.

IVF is performed by reproductive endocrinologists, a subgroup of ob/gyns, along with partner embryologists.

Osteoporosis and incontinence have become frequent diagnoses as the female population ages. Early identification and treatment of these conditions will both improve women's health and help reduce overall costs of treatment.

Sterilization is a frequently performed procedure.

Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Hysteroscopy is commonly used in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.

The trend to move hospital-based procedures to an office or clinical setting is continuing as a method to reduce cost to the healthcarehealth care system while maintaining positivewithout compromising clinical outcomes.

Increased awareness of improved IVF outcomes with preimplantation genetic screening will continue.

Women's Healthcareand Family Reproductive Health Care Product Sales

Net sales of CooperSurgical products used in office and surgical procedures represented 66% of CooperSurgical's net sales in fiscal 2015. Net sales of fertility products represented 34% of CooperSurgical's net sales in fiscal 2015.

chart-19b6f1d059ddbee1519a02.jpg
CooperSurgical Competition

CooperSurgical focuses on selected segments of the family and women's healthcarehealth care market, supplying diagnostic products, services, and surgical instruments and accessories. In some instances, CooperSurgical offers all of the items needed for a complete procedure. CooperSurgical believes that opportunities exist for continued market consolidation of smaller technology-driven firms that generally offer only one or two product lines. Most are privately owned or divisions of public companies including some owned by companies with greater financial resources than Cooper.

Competitive factors in these segments include technological and scientific advances, product quality, price, customer service and effective communication of product information to physicians, fertility clinics and hospitals. CooperSurgical competes based on our sales and marketing expertise and the technological advantages of our products. CooperSurgical's strategy includes developing and acquiring new products, including those used in new medical procedures. As CooperSurgical expands its product line, we also offer educational programs for medical professionals in the appropriate use of our products.

CooperSurgical is seeking to expand our presence in the significantly larger hospital and outpatient surgical procedure segment of the market that is at present dominated by bigger competitors such as Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon Endo-Surgery,Johnson, Boston Scientific, Hologic, Olympus and Covidien.Medtronic. These competitors have well-established positions within the operating room environment. CooperSurgical intends to leverage our relationship with gynecologic surgeons and focus on devices specific to gynecologic surgery to facilitate our expansion within the surgical segment of the market.


9


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CooperSurgical also competes in the fertility category of the women's healthcarehealth care market. We have broad product offerings for fertility evaluations and IVF procedures by ob/gyns, reproductive endocrinologists and embryologists. These include products for use by the ob/gyns in their offices for initial evaluations with office basedoffice-based hysteroscopy and first line treatments such as intrauterine insemination. For use inIn fertility

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


clinics, our products include media, micro tools and lab equipment; and to improve IVF outcomes we offer screening testing services intended to increase implantation rates and decrease miscarriages.

CooperSurgical intends to leverage our relationship with fertility clinics to expand our presence in the fertility market against competitors in the media and microtools categories that include Vitrolife, Cook and Irvine Scientific and Life Globalcompetitors in fertility and competitors infamilial reproductive genetic testing that include Genesis Genetics, Good Start GeneticsNatera, Invitae and Igenomix.

With the acquisition of PARAGARD in fiscal 2018, CooperSurgical now competes in the IUD market. PARAGARD is the only non-hormonal IUD option in the United States and has a 10-year use indication. In the United States, where all IUDs are regulated as pharmaceuticals, we compete with manufacturers of hormonal IUDs including Bayer and Allergan. Outside of the United States, non-hormonal IUDs are more typically regulated as devices and are sold by a number of manufacturers. Currently, PARAGARD is not sold outside of the United States.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

CooperThe Company employs approximately 215258 people in our research and development and manufacturing engineering departments.development. CooperVision product development and clinical research is supported by internal and external specialists in lens design, formulation science, polymer chemistry, clinical trials, microbiology and biochemistry. CooperVision's research and development activities primarily include programs to develop new contact lens designs and manufacturing technology, along with improving formulations and manufacturing processes.existing products.

CooperSurgical conducts research and development in-house and also has consulting agreements with external specialists. CooperSurgical's research and development activities include the design and improvement of surgical procedure devices, the advancement and expansion of CooperSurgical's portfolio of assisted reproductive technology products, genetic screening and testing, as well as products within the general obstetrics and gynecology offerings.

Cooper-sponsored research and development expenditures represented 4% of net sales during fiscal 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013, and2016, were $69.6$84.8 million, $66.3$69.2 million and $58.8$65.4 million, respectively. As a percentage of sales, research and development expenditures were 3% in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016. During fiscal 2015,2018, CooperVision represented 79 percent64% and CooperSurgical represented 21 percent36% of the total research and development expenses, the same ascompared to 69% and 31% in fiscal 2014. We did not participate in any customer-sponsored research2017 for CooperVision and development programs during fiscal 2013 - 2015.CooperSurgical respectively.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Regulation

OurMost of our products are medical devices subject to extensive regulation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)FDA in the United States and other regulatory bodies abroad. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and FDA regulations govern, among other things, medical device design and development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, recordkeeping,record keeping, premarket clearance or approval, advertising and promotion, and sales and distribution. Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to distribute commercially in the United States will require either prior notice to the FDA requesting clearance for commercial distribution under Section 510(k) of the FDCA, or premarket approval (PMA) from the FDA. A majority of the medical devices we currently market have received FDA clearance through the 510(k) process or approval through the PMA process. Because we cannot be assured that any new products we develop, or any product enhancements, will be exempt from the premarket clearance or approval requirements or will be subject to the shorter 510(k) clearance process rather than the PMA process, significant delays in the introduction of any new products or product enhancements may occur.


10


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Device Classification

The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes - Class I, II or III - depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Both CooperVision and CooperSurgical develop and market medical devices under different levels of FDA regulation depending on the classification of the device. Class III devices, such as flexible and extended wear contact lenses, require extensive premarket testing and approval, while Class I and II devices require lower levels of regulation. The majority of CooperSurgical's products are Class II devices.

Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA's general regulatory controls for medical devices, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA's Quality System Regulation, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials (General Controls). Some Class I devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) premarket notification process described below.

Class II devices are subject to the FDA's General Controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, such as performance standards, post-market surveillance, FDA guidelines or particularized labeling requirements. Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for Class II devices is accomplished through the 510(k) premarket notification procedure. Pursuant to the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA), unless a specific exemption applies, 510(k) premarket notification submissions are subject to user fees. Certain Class II devices are exempt from this premarket review process.

Class III devices are those devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or certain implantable devices, or which have a new intended use, or use advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to that of a legally marketed device. The safety and effectiveness of Class III devices cannot be assured solely by the General Controls and other special controls such as those listed above. These devices almost always require formal clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness and must be approved through the PMA process described below. PMA applications (and supplemental PMA applications) are subject to significantly higher user fees under MDUFMA than are 510(k) premarket notifications.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



510(k) Clearance Pathway

When we are required to obtain a 510(k) clearance for a Class I or Class II device that we wish to market, we must submit a premarket notification to the FDA demonstrating that the device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution in the United States before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of PMA applications. The FDA aims to respond to a 510(k) premarket notification within 90 days of submission of the notification, but as a practical matter, clearance can take significantly longer. If the FDA determines that the device is not substantially equivalent to a previously-cleared device, the FDA will not clear the device. Although many 510(k) pre-market notifications are cleared without clinical data, in some cases, the FDA requires significant clinical data to support substantial equivalence. In reviewing a pre-market notification, the FDA may request additional information, including clinical data, which may significantly prolong the review process. If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device currently on the market, it will grant 510(k) clearance to commercially market the device. If the FDA determines that the device is not substantially equivalent to a previously cleared device, the device is automatically designated as a Class III device. The device sponsor must then fulfill more rigorous PMA requirements, or can request a risk-based classification determination for the device in accordance with the de novo process.

After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that changes its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or could require premarket approval. The FDA requires each manufacturer to make this determination initially, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturer's determination. If the FDA disagrees with a

11


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


manufacturer's determination that a new clearance or approval is not required for a particular modification, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or premarket approval is obtained. In these circumstances, a manufacturer also may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties. We have made and plan to continue to make additional product enhancements and modifications to our devices that we believe do not require new 510(k) clearances.

Premarket Approval Pathway

A PMA application must be submitted if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) premarket notification procedures.procedures or if the device has been previously classified as Class III. The PMA process is much more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. A PMA application must be supported by extensive data including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA's satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use.

AfterFollowing receipt of a PMA application, is complete, the FDA beginsconducts an in-depthadministrative review ofto determine whether the submitted information.application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If it is not, the agency will refuse to file the PMA. If it is, the FDA will accept the application for filing and begin the review. The FDA, by statute and regulation, has 180 days to review an accepted PMA application, although the review generally occurs over a significantly longer period of time, and can take up to several years. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information, including clinical data, or clarification of information already provided.provided, and the FDA may issue a major deficiency letter to the applicant, requesting the applicant's response to deficiencies communicated by the FDA. The FDA considers a PMA or PMA supplement to have been voluntarily withdrawn if an applicant fails to respond to an FDA request for information (e.g., major deficiency letter) within 180 days after the FDA issues such request. Also, during the review period, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. In addition, the FDA will conduct a preapproval inspection of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with the Quality System Regulation (QSR), which requires manufacturers to implement and follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures in the device design and manufacturing process.

The FDA may approve a PMA application with post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution and collection of long-term follow-up data from patients in the clinical study that supported approval. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval can result in materially adverse enforcement action, including the loss or withdrawal of the approval. New PMA applications or PMA application supplements are required for significant modifications to the manufacturing process, labeling and design of a device that is approved through the premarket approvalPMA process. Premarket approvalPMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a premarket approvalPMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original premarket approvalPMA application, and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

Clinical Trials for Medical Devices

A clinical trial is almost always required to support a PMA application and is sometimes required for a 510(k) premarket notification. These trials generally require submission of an application for an investigational device exemption (IDE) to the FDA. Some types of studies deemed to present "non-significant risk" are deemed to have an approved IDE once certain requirements are addressed and Institutional Review Board approval is obtained. If the device presents a "significant risk" to human health, as defined by the FDA, the sponsor must submit an IDE application to the FDA and obtain IDE approval prior to commencing the human clinical trials. The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results, showing that the potential benefits of testing the device in humans and the importance of the knowledge to be gained outweighs the risks to human subjects from the proposed investigation that the testing protocol is scientifically sound and there is reason to believe that the device as proposed for use will be effective. The IDE application must be approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients, unless the product is deemed a non-significant risk device and eligible for more abbreviated investigational device exemption requirements. Clinical trials for a significant risk device may begin once the IDE application is approved by both the FDA and the appropriate institutional review boards at the clinical trial sites. There can be no assurance that submission of an IDE will result in the ability to

12


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


commence clinical trials. Additionally, after a trial begins, the FDA may place it on hold or terminate it if, among other reasons, it concludes that the clinical subjects are exposed to unacceptable health risks that outweigh the benefits of participation in the study. During a study, we are required to comply with the FDA's IDE requirements for investigator selection, trial monitoring, reporting, record keeping and prohibitions on the promotion of investigational devices or making safety or efficacy claims for them. We are also responsible for the appropriate labeling and distribution of investigational devices. All of Cooper's currently marketed products have been cleared by all appropriate regulatory agencies, and Cooper has no product currently being marketed under an IDE.

Continuing FDA and Other Government Agency Regulation of Medical Devices

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include: establishment registration and device listing with the FDA; the QSR, which requires manufacturers to follow design, testing, production, control, complaint handling, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during the manufacturing process; labeling regulations, which prohibit the promotion of products for uncleared or unapproved or “off-label” uses and impose other restrictions on

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


labeling, advertising and promotion; new FDA unique device identifier regulations, that requireswhich require changes to labeling and packaging; the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires the reporting of certain payments to health care practitioners; and medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur. The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers. We are subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with the QSR and other regulations.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, which are subject to new legislation and change, can result in enforcement action by the FDA, or other federal and state government agencies which may include, but may not be limited to, any of the following sanctions or consequences: warning letters or untitled letters; fines, injunctions and civil penalties; recall, seizure or import holds of our products; operating restrictions, suspension or shutdown of production; refusing to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in other countries; refusing our request for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new or modified products; withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that are already granted; and criminal prosecution.

Laboratory Developed Tests

Our genetic testing laboratory services are not currently regulated by the FDA, or foreign ministries of health. Although the FDA has statutory authority to regulate in vitro diagnostic products (IVDs) used for clinical purposes as medical devices, and to assure that such products are safe and effective for their intended uses, the FDA has historically exercised its enforcement discretion and not enforced applicable provisions of the FDCA and regulations with respect to laboratory developed tests (LDTs), which are a subset of IVDs that are intended for clinical use and designed, manufactured and used within a single laboratory. We believe our genetic laboratory tests fall within the definition of an LDT. As a result, we believe our tests are not currently subject to the FDA’s enforcement of its medical device regulations and the applicable FDCA provisions. Even though we commercialize our tests as LDTs, our tests may in the future become subject to more onerous regulation by the FDA.

Pharmaceutical Regulation

Our PARAGARD Intrauterine Copper Contraceptive is regulated by the FDA as a drug.

In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the FDCA and its implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA’s refusal to approve pending New Drug Applications (NDA), withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.

Any drug products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including manufacturing, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising, promotion, drug shortage reporting, compliance with any post-approval requirements imposed as a conditional of approval such as Phase 4 clinical trials, a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), and surveillance, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, including adverse experiences.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims are subject to further testing to new clinical investigation requirements and prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing, annual program fee requirements for any approved products and the establishments at which such products are manufactured, as well as new application fees for supplemental applications with clinical data. Drug manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies and to list their drug products and are subject to periodic announced and unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMPs, and other requirements, which impose procedural and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers.

Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented, or FDA notification. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMPs specifications and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.

Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in withdrawal of marketing approval, mandatory revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information or other limitations, imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks, or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program, among other consequences.

The FDA closely regulates the marketing and promotion of drugs. A company can make only those claims relating to safety and efficacy, purity and potency that are approved by the FDA. Physicians, in their independent professional medical judgement, may prescribe legally available products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ from those tested by us and approved by the FDA. We, however, are prohibited from marketing or promoting drugs for uses outside of the approved labeling.
In addition, the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical products, including samples, is subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act (PDMA), which regulates the distribution of drugs and drug samples at the federal level, and sets minimum standards for the registration and regulation of drug distributors by the states. Both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical product samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution. The Drug Supply Chain Security Act also imposes obligations on manufacturers of pharmaceutical products related to product and tracking and serialization.

Failure to comply with any of the FDA’s requirements, which are subject to new legislation and change, could result in significant adverse enforcement actions. These include a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as refusal to approve pending applications, license suspension or revocation, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold or termination of clinical trials, warning letters, untitled letters, cyber letters, modification of promotional materials or labeling, product recalls, product seizures or detentions, refusal to allow imports or exports, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, debarment, injunctions, fines, consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements, refusals of government contracts and new orders under existing contracts, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment. It is also possible that failure to comply with the FDA’s requirements relating to the promotion of prescription drugs may lead to investigations alleging violations of federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse and other laws, as well as state consumer protection laws. Any of these sanctions could result in adverse publicity, among other adverse consequences.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Foreign Regulation

Health authorities in foreign countries regulate Cooper's clinical trials and medical device sales. The regulations vary widely from country to country. Even if the FDA has cleared or approved a product in the United States, the regulatory agencies in other countries must approve new products before they may be marketed there. The time required to obtain approval in another country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA clearance or approval, and the requirements may differ. There is a trend towards harmonization of quality system standards among the European Union, United States, Canada and various other industrialized countries. Japan has one of the most rigorous regulatory systems in the world and requires in-country clinical trials. The Japanese quality and regulatory standards remain stringent even with the more recent harmonization efforts and updated Japanese regulations. China is also updating its regulations and is requiring rigorous in-country product testing.

These regulatory procedures require a considerable investment in time and resources and usually result in a substantial delay between new product development and marketing. If the Company does not maintain compliance with regulatory standards or if problems occur after marketing, product approval may be withdrawn.


13


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


In addition to FDA regulatory requirements, Cooper also maintains ISO 13485 certification and CE mark approvals for its products. A CE mark is an international symbol of adherence to certain standards and compliance with applicable European medical device requirements. These quality programs and approvals are required by the European Medical Device Directive and must be maintained for all products intended to be sold in the European market. The ISO 13485 Quality Measurement System registration is now also required for registration of products in Asia Pacific and Latin American countries. In order to maintain these quality benchmarks, the Company is subjected to rigorous biannual reassessment audits of its quality systems and procedures.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Other Health Care Regulation

We may be subject to various federal, state and foreign laws pertaining to healthcarehealth care fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws and physician self-referral laws, physician payment transparency laws, and laws pertaining to health information privacy and security. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcarehealth care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration health programs and TRICARE. Similarly, if the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we do business are found to be noncompliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could indirectly have a negative impact on our business, financial conditions and results of operations. While we believe that our operations are in material compliance with such laws, as applicable to us, because of the complex and far-reaching nature of these laws, there can be no assurance that we would not be required to alter one or more of our practices to be in compliance with these laws.

In addition, the federal government, as part of the Affordable Care Act (the ACA), as well as certain state governments have enacted laws aimed at increasing transparency in relationships between medical device companies and health care professionals. We are now required by the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act and similar state and foreign laws to report annually many types of payments made and items of value provided to licensed health care professionals. Certain states also mandate implementation of commercial compliance programs, impose restrictions on device manufacturer marketing practices and tracking and/or require the reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration to physicians. In addition, certain foreign jurisdictions have adopted, or are currently acting to implement, similar laws. Failure to adhere to our policies, comply with required laws or implement adequate policies and practices to address changes to legal and regulatory requirements could result in sanctions such as fines, injunctions and civil penalties.

The impact to our businesses of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)ACA provisions related to coverage expansion, payment reforms and delivery system changes remains uncertain. The ACA imposes a 2.3 percent excise tax, with limited exceptions, on any entity that manufactures or imports Class I, II and III medical devices offered for sale in the United States that began on January 1, 2013. CooperVision's products are not subject to this tax because contact lenses are excluded from the tax. However, United States sales of CooperSurgical's products are subject to this tax which is recorded in selling, general and administrative expense on our Statement of Income. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 imposed a two year moratorium of the device excise tax for device sales in calendar years 2016 and 2017. On January 22, 2018, the moratorium was extended for two more years. Absent further legislative action, the device excise tax will be reinstated on medical device sales starting January 1, 2020.

In addition,We cannot predict at this time the federal government, as partfull impact of the ACA, as well as certain state governmentsor the impact of any U.S. legislation enacted in the future will have enacted laws aimed at increasing transparency in relationships between medical device companieson our revenues, profit margins, profitability, operating cash flows and healthcare professionals. We are now requiredresults of operations. For example, the Trump Administration recently narrowed the ACA mandate for employers and insurers to cover birth control pills and other contraceptives by law to report annually manyexpanding the types of payments madeentities that could invoke religious or moral beliefs to avoid the ACA requirement. The Trump Administration and itemsthe U.S. Congress may take further action regarding the ACA, including, but not limited to, repeal or replacement. Additionally, all or a portion of value provided to licensed healthcare professionals. In addition, certain foreign jurisdictions have adopted,the ACA and related subsequent legislation may be modified, repealed or are currently acting to implement, similar laws. Failure to adhere to our policies, comply with required laws or implement adequate policies and practices to address changes to legal and regulatory requirements could result in sanctions such as fines, injunctions and civil penalties.otherwise invalidated through judicial challenge.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


RAW MATERIALS

CooperVision'sOur businesses utilize various chemicals, packaging materials, components, parts and raw materials primarily consist of various chemicals and packaging materials andwhich are generally available from more than one source. However CooperVision relies onin certain instances we acquire components and materials from sole suppliers for certain raw materials used to make our silicone hydrogel contact lens, certain medical devices and IVF products. IfSupply of these materials is protected by contractual agreements and safety stocks. However if current raw material suppliers fail to supply sufficient materials on a timely basis, or at all for any reason, we may suffer acould experience inventory shortages and disruption in the supply of our silicone hydrogel contact lens products.

Raw materials used by CooperSurgical are generally available from more than one source. However, because some products require specialized manufacturing procedures, we could experience inventory shortages if we were required to use an alternative supplier on short notice.


14


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION

CooperVision markets our products in the United States through our own field sales representatives, who call on optometrists, ophthalmologists, opticians, optical chains and distributors. CooperVision augments our United States salesalso sells to distributors and to mass merchandisers who offer eye care services. To support the sale and use of CooperVision products, CooperVision engages in various activities and offers a variety of services. These include clinical training, digital marketing efforts withfor the customer, e-commerce, telemarketing, social media, and advertisingjournal advertisements. CooperVision also invested in professional journals.tools that allow our customers to offer their patients monthly purchase and delivery subscriptions. In the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions,certain smaller countries, CooperVision primarily markets our products through our field sales representatives. In other countries, CooperVisionoften uses distributors and has given some of them the exclusive rightleverages our distributors' sales and marketing resources to market our products within specific geographic areas.attract major customers to CooperVision.

CooperSurgical's products are marketed by a network of dedicated field sales representatives, independent agents and distributors. In the United States, CooperSurgical augments ourits sales and marketing activities by participating in national and regional industry tradeshows,trade shows, professional educational programs and internet promotions including e-commerce, social media and collaborative efforts with professional organizations, telemarketing, direct mail and advertising in professional journals. Fertility products are marketed globally through our field sales representatives and distributors.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSING AGREEMENTS

Cooper owns or licenses a variety of domestic and foreign patents, which, in total, are material to our overall business. The names of certain of Cooper's products are protected by trademark registrations in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and, in some cases, also in foreign trademark offices. Applications are pending for additional trademark and patent registrations. Cooper intends to protect our intellectual property rights aggressively.

No individual patent or license is material to the Company or either of our principal business units other than our license agreement effective as of November 19, 2007, between CooperVision and CIBA Vision AG and CIBA Vision Corporation. This license relates to patents covering CooperVision's silicone hydrogel contact lens products. Our royalty obligations under this license agreement extend until the expiration of the applicable patent rights, which we believe occurred in September 2014 in the United States and, we believe will occur in March 2016 outside of the United States. 

In addition to trademarks and patent licenses, we own certain trade secrets, copyrights, know-how and other intellectual property.

DEPENDENCE ON CUSTOMERS

NeitherNo customers accounted for 10% or more of our business units depends to any material extent on any oneconsolidated net revenue in fiscal 2018. One customer, or any one affiliated groupa CooperVision contact lens distributor, accounted for approximately 10% and 11% of customers.our consolidated net revenue in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 12. Business Segment Information of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

Neither of our business units is materially subject to profit renegotiation or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the United States government.

BACKLOG

Backlog is not a material factor in either of Cooper's business units.


15


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


SEASONALITY

CooperVision's contact lensCooperVision and CooperSurgical net sales in its fiscal first quarter, which runs from November 1 through January 31, are typically lower than subsequent quarters, as patient traffic to practitioners' offices, fertility clinics, and hospitals/surgical centers for surgical procedures is relatively light during the holiday season.

COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

Federal, state and local provisions that regulate the discharge of materials into the environment, or relate to the protection of the environment, do not currently materially affect Cooper's capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT BUSINESS SEGMENTS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS, FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES

The information required by this item is included in "Business Segment Information" of our notes to consolidated financial statementsthe Consolidated Financial Statements and "Risk Factors" as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015.2018.

EMPLOYEES

On As of October 31, 2015, Cooper2018, we had approximately 10,20012,000 employees. We believe thatwe have good relations with our employees are good.employees.

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE CERTIFICATION

We submitted our 20152018 annual Section 12(a) CEO certification with the New York Stock Exchange. The certification was not qualified in any respect. Additionally, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2015,2018, the CEO and CFO certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Cooper Companies, Inc. Internet address is http://www.coopercos.com. The information on the Company's Websitewebsite is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, along with all other reports and amendments filed with or furnished to the SEC, are publicly available free of charge on our Websitewebsite as soon as reasonably practicable. The public may read and copy these materials at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002.20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a Websitewebsite that contains such reports, proxy and information statements and other information whose Internet address is http://www.sec.gov. The Company's Corporate Governance Principles, Ethics and Business Conduct Policy and charters of each standing committee of the Board of Directors are also posted on the Company's Website.website.


16


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business faces significant risks. These risks include those described below and may include additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks, and the trading prices of our common stock could decline by virtue of these risks. These risks should be read in conjunction with the other information in this report.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We operate in the highly competitive healthcarehealth care industry and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully.

Each of our businesses operates within a highly competitive environment. In our soft contact lens business, CooperVision faces intense competition from competitors' products, in particular silicone hydrogel contact lenses, and may face increasing competition as other new products enter the market. Our majorlargest competitors in the contact lens business, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., CIBA Vision and Alcon (owned by Novartis AG) and Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (owned by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.),may have substantially greater financial resources, larger research and development budgets, larger sales forces, greater market penetration and/or larger manufacturing volumes than CooperVision. They offer competitive products and differentiated materials, plus a variety of other eye care products including lens care products and ophthalmic pharmaceuticals, which may give them a competitive advantage in marketing their lenses. The market for contact lenses is intensely competitive and is characterized by declining sales volumes for older product lines and growing demand for silicone hydrogel based products. Our ability to respond to these competitive pressures will depend on our ability to decrease our costs and maintain gross margins and operating results and to introduce new products successfully, on a timely basis in the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific, and to achieve manufacturing efficiencies and sufficient manufacturing capacity and capabilities for such products. Any significant decrease in our costs per lens will depend, in part, on our ability to increase sales volume and production capabilities. Our failure to respond to competitive pressures in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

To a lesser extent, CooperVision also competes with manufacturers of eyeglasses and providers of other forms of vision correction including ophthalmic surgery.

There can be no assurance that we will not encounter increased competition in the future, for example with increased product entries from Asia Pacific contact lens manufacturers, or that our competitors' newer contact lens products will not successfully erode CooperVision's contact lens business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The contact lens industry also continues to evolve with respect to the introduction of new distribution and fulfillment models and service technologies which may conflict with CooperVision’s strategy or interfere with its customers’ relationships and loyalty. For example, more contact lenses are being fulfilled directly to the consumer by manufacturers and wholesalers via online platforms, telemedicine is gaining popularity and more vision correction prescriptions are being provided through online refractive exams rather than in office by an eye care practitioner. CooperVision’s failure to adapt to the threats posed by

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


these new and emerging distribution models and Internet driven services may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the women's healthcarehealth care market, competitive factors include technological and scientific advances, product quality, price and effective communication of product information to physicians, hospitals, patients and hospitals.IVF clinics. CooperSurgical competes with a number of manufacturers in each of its niche areas, some of which have substantially greater financial and personnel resources and sell a much broader range of products, which may give them an advantage in marketing competitive products.

Acquisitions that we have made and may make in the future involve numerous risks.

We have a history of acquiring businesses and products that have significantly contributed to our growth in recent years. As part of our growth strategy, particularly at CooperSurgical and more recently at CooperVision, we intend to continue to consider acquiring complementary technologies, products and businesses. Future

17


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and an increase in amortization and/or impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations. CooperVision acquired Paragon Vision Sciences and Blueyes in fiscal 2018; Procornea and Grand Vista LLC in fiscal 2017. CooperSurgical acquired ReprogeneticsPARAGARD and LifeGlobal in fiscal 2015, CooperVision completed the acquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Limited2018; Wallace in fiscal 2014, and CooperSurgical completed the acquisition of Origio a/s in fiscal 2012.2017. These acquisitions added significant operations to CooperVision and CooperSurgical, respectively, and greatly expanded their international businesses. The acquisitions have, correspondingly, added risks we could face with respect to acquisitions and include:

failure to successfully obtain the anticipated revenues, margins and earnings benefits;
difficulties in, and expenses related to, the integration of the operations, technologies, products and personnel of the acquired company and establishment of appropriate accounting controls and reporting procedures and other regulatory compliance procedures;procedures, including but not limited to third party compliance and due diligence;
increased leverage and the risk of lack of access to available financing, including financing for the acquisition or refinancing of debt owed by us on a timely basis and on reasonable terms;
risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience;
potential loss of employees;
an inability to identify and consummate future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all;
diversion of management's attention away from other business concerns;
expenses of any undisclosed or potential liabilities, contingent liabilities or indemnification obligations of the acquired company;
expenses, including restructuring expenses, to shut-down our own locations or terminate our employees;
application of and compliance with new and unfamiliar regulatory frameworks such as pharmaceutical regulation applicable to our PARAGARD IUD;
Failure to successfully obtain or maintain reimbursements under the third party payor plans, including but not limited to governmental programs, due to complex reporting and payment obligations;
a dilution of earnings per share; and

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


risks inherent in accounting allocations and the risk that we are required to record significant adjustments to the preliminary fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed within the measurement period.

Product innovations are important in the industry in which we operate, and we face the risk of product obsolescence if we are unable to develop new products or gain regulatory approvals or if our competitors introduce new products.

Product innovations are important in the contact lens market in which CooperVision competes and in the areas of the healthcarehealth care industry in which CooperSurgical competes. CooperSurgical has not allocated substantial resources to new product development, but rather it has historically purchased, leveraged or licensed the technology developments of others. Over the past few years, CooperSurgical has recently invested in expanding the internal research and development function with the goal of organizational growth and to complement our acquisitions strategy. CooperVision, both internally and externally with third parties, invests in new product development, including the development of silicone hydrogel-based contact lenses. While much of CooperVision’s research and development activities are performed internally, it also uses external research and development investment in collaborations and joint development with third parties. Research and development time commitments, higher feasibility risk with longer term projects, greater dependence on, and reduced control over, third party deliverables, the cost of obtaining necessary regulatory approval and other costs related to product innovations can be substantial. There can be no assurance that we will successfully obtain necessary regulatory approvals or clearances for our new products or that our new products will successfully compete in the marketplace and, as a result, justify the expense involved in their development and regulatory approval. In addition, our competitors may have developed or may in the future develop new products or technologies, such as contact lenses with anti-microbial or anti-allergenic features, or “smart” contact lenses which incorporate electronics that could lead to the obsolescence of one or more of our products. Competitors may also introduce new uses for contact lenses, such as for drug delivery or the control of myopia. Failure to

18


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


develop new product offerings and technological changes and to offer products that provide performance that is at least comparable to competing products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

If our products are not accepted by the market, we will not be able to sustain or expand our business.

Certain of our proposed products have not yet been clinically tested or commercially introduced, and we cannot assure that any of them, assuming they receive necessary regulatory approvals, will achieve market acceptance or generate operating profits. The development of a market for our products may be influenced by many factors, some of which are out of our control, including:

acceptance of our products by eye care and women's healthcarehealth care practitioners;
the cost competitiveness of our products;
consumer reluctance to try and use a new product;
regulatory and legislative requirements;
adequate coverage and reimbursement by third party payors;
the earlier release of competitive products, such as new silicone hydrogel products, into the market by our competitors; and
the emergence of newer and more competitive products.



THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




New medical and technological developments may reduce the need for our products.

Technological developments in the eye care, family and women's healthcarehealth care, and diagnostics testing industries, such as new surgical procedures or medical devices, and genetic testing technology may limit demand for our products.products and services. Corneal refractive surgical procedures such as Lasik surgery and the development of new pharmaceutical products may decrease the demand for our optical products. If these new advances provide a practical alternative to traditional vision correction, the demand for contact lenses and eyeglasses may materially decrease. We cannot assure that medical advances and technological developments will not have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Our substantial and expanding international operations are subject to uncertainties which could affect our operating results.

A significant portion of our current operations are conducted and located outside the United States, and our growth strategy involves expanding our existing foreign operations and entering into new foreign jurisdictions. We have significant manufacturing and distribution sites in North America, Latin America and Europe. Over half of our net sales for the fiscal years ended October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, were derived from the sale of products outside the United States. We believe that sales outside the United States will continue to account for a material portion of our total net sales for the foreseeable future. International operations and business expansion plans are subject to numerous additional risks, including:

we may have difficulty enforcing intellectual property rights in some foreign countries;
we may have difficulty gaining market share in countries such as Japan and China because of regulatory restrictions and customer preferences;
we may find it difficult to grow in emerging markets such as China, India, Russia, Brazil and other developing nations due to, among other things, customer acceptance, undeveloped and/or unfamiliar distribution channels, regulatory restrictions and changes, and business knowledge of these new markets;

19


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


tax rates in some foreign countries may exceed those of the United States, and foreign earnings may be subject to withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or other restrictions;restrictions, including the tariffs recently enacted and proposed by the U.S. government on various imports from China and by the Chinese government on certain U.S. goods, the scope and duration of which remain uncertain;
we may find it difficult to comply with a variety of United States and foreign legal, compliance and regulatory requirements such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and international data security and privacy laws;
we may find it difficult to manage a large organization spread throughout various countries;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates could adversely affect our results;
foreign customers may have longer payment cycles than customers in the United States;
failure to comply with United States Department of Commerce and other nationsnations' import-export controls may result in fines and/or penalties;
general economic and political conditions in the countries where we operate may have an adverse effect on our operations in those countries or not be favorable to our growth strategy;

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


foreign governments may adopt regulations or take other actions that would have a direct or indirect adverse impact on our business and market opportunities, including but not limited to increased enforcement of potentially conflicting and ambiguous anti-bribery laws; and
we may have difficulty enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through some foreign legal systems.systems; and
we may be subject to unforeseen economic or political events in certain countries that may have an impact on our customers' ability or preferences to buy our products.

As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. However, any of these factors could adversely affect our international operations and, consequently, our operating results.

Current market conditions and recessionary pressures in one or more of our markets could impact our ability to grow our business.

Over the last few years in the United States and globally, market and economic conditions have been challenging with tighter credit conditions and slower economic growth. Foreign countries, in particular the Euro zone, have experienced recessionary pressures and face continued concerns about the systemic impacts of adverse economic conditions and geopolitical issues. Concerns about the Euro zone’s sovereign debt in recent years have caused uncertainty and disruption in the financial markets globally. While the global financial markets have showed general signs of improvement, uncertainty remains. As a result, we may have lower than historical performance for market growth in fiscal 2016.

Any negative impact on economic conditions and international markets, continued volatility or deterioration in the debt and equity capital markets, inflation, deflation or other adverse economic conditions may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our customers. It may limit our ability, and the ability of our customers, to replace maturing liabilities and to access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Global markets continued to face threats and uncertainty during fiscal 2018. Uncertain economic and financial market conditions may also adversely affect the financial condition of our customers, suppliers and other business partners. If our customers’ financial conditions are adversely affected, customers may reduce their purchases of our products or we may not be able to collect accounts receivable, each of which could have a material adverse impact on our business operations or financial results.

CooperVision and CooperSurgical are encountering consolidation in their customer bases and emergence of more centralized large customer groups and retail chains. Due to this trend, global and regional key account customers now represent a larger proportion or concentration of our business and any disruption to these relationships may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.
20
The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.


We are a multinational company headquartered in the United States with worldwide operations, with significant business operations in Europe, including in the United Kingdom. In June 2016, a majority of voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in a national referendum. In March 2017, the government of the United Kingdom formally gave notice of its intent to withdraw from

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


the European Union. Serving this notice began a two-year period for the United Kingdom to negotiate terms for its withdrawal from the European Union. At this time, it is not certain what steps, may be taken to facilitate the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union, which has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union.

This development has had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what implications the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union will have and how such withdrawal could affect, or whether it could have a material adverse effect on, our business, financial condition and operating results.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

We have now and expect to continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness.

Our indebtedness could:

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;
result in greater interest rate risk and volatility;
limit our ability to borrow additional funds; and
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt, including our obligation to repay our credit facilities under certain circumstances, or refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms or at all.

Our credit facilities contain financial and other restrictive covenants that could limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debt, which could adversely affect our business, earnings and financial condition.

We are vulnerable to interest rate risk with respect to our debt.

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with the issuance of variable and fixed-rate debt. In order to maintain a desired mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt, we may use interest rate swap agreements and exchange fixed and variable-rate interest payment obligations over the life of the arrangements, without exchange of the underlying principal amounts. We may not be successful in structuring such swap agreements to manage our risks effectively and, which could adversely affect our business, earnings and financial condition.




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exchange rate fluctuations and our foreign currency hedges could adversely affect our financial results.

As a result of our international operations, currency exchange rate fluctuations may affect our results of operations and financial position. Our most significant currency exposures are the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen. We are also exposed to the Danish krone, Swedish krona, Australian dollar and Canadian dollar among other currencies. We expect to generate an increasing portion of our revenue and incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than U.S. dollars. To the extent we are unable to materially offset non-nonfunctional currency flows, exchange rate fluctuations could have a positive or negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, if we generate sales or earnings in other currencies, the translation of those results into U.S. dollars can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or earnings and can make it more difficult for our shareholders to understand the relative strengths or weaknesses of the underlying business on a period-over-period comparative basis. Although from time to time we enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions to reduce our net exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values relative to our non-functional currency obligations or balances, these hedging transactions do not eliminate that risk entirely.

We face risks associated with disruption of our manufacturing and distribution operations andincluding possible failure to develop newnecessary manufacturing processes, thator idle or excess capacity could adversely affect our profitability or competitive position.

We manufacture a significant portion of the medical device products we sell. Any prolonged disruption in the operations of our existing manufacturing or distribution facilities, whether due to technical or labor difficulties, integration difficulties, destruction of or damage to any facility (as a result of natural disaster, use and storage of hazardous materials or other events), enforcement action by the FDA or other regulatory body if we are found to be in non-compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) or other reasons, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, materials such as silicone hydrogel require improvements to our manufacturing processes to make them cost effective. While we have improved our manufacturing capabilities for our silicone hydrogel products, our failure to continue to develop improvements to our manufacturing processes and reduce our cost of goods could significantly impact our ability to compete. Conversely, excess or idle capacity, which could result from acquisitions, inaccurate sales forecasting or unexpected manufacturing efficiencies, could significantly impact our profitability and near term financial condition.

CooperVision manufactures molded contact lenses, which represent the majority of our contact lens revenues, primarily at our facilities in the United Kingdom, Puerto Rico, Hungary, Costa Rica and Hungary.the United States. CooperSurgical manufactures the majority of its products in Trumbull, Connecticut, Stafford, Texas, Malov,New York, Denmark, Costa Rica and Pasadena, California.United Kingdom. In November 2017, CooperSurgical purchased a manufacturing facility in Costa Rica to consolidate a portion of global manufacturing. We manufacture certain products at only one manufacturing site for certain markets, and certain of our products are approved for manufacturing only at one site. Before we can use a second manufacturing site, we must obtain the approval of regulatory authorities, and because this process is expensive, we generally have not sought approvals needed to manufacture at an additional site. If there were any prolonged disruption in the operations of the approved facility, it could take a significant amount of time to validate a second site and replace lost product, which could result in lost customers and thereby reduce sales, profitability and market share.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CooperVision distributes products out of West Henrietta, New York, Hampshire,the United States, the United Kingdom, Liege, Belgium and various smaller international distribution facilities. CooperSurgical's products are primarily distributed out of its facilities in Trumbull, Connecticut, Denmark and Malov, Denmark.the Netherlands. CooperSurgical is currently shifting its primary distribution facility from Denmark to Venlo, Netherlands. Any prolonged disruption in the operations of our existing distribution facilities, whether due to technical or labor difficulties, challenges related to system implementation, destruction of or damage to any facility (as a result of natural disaster, use and storage of hazardous materials or other events) or other reasons, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our manufacturing operations fail to comply with applicable regulations, our manufacturing could be delayed or disrupted, our products could be subject to recall, and sales and profitability could suffer.

Our manufacturing operations and processes are required to comply with numerous federal, state and foreign regulatory requirements, including the FDA's cGMP for medical devices, known as the QSR regulations, which govern the procedures related to the design, testing, production processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage, importing, exporting and shipping of our products. We also are subject to state requirements and licenses applicable to manufacturers of medical devices. In addition, we must engage in extensive recordkeeping and reporting and must make available our manufacturing facilities and records for periodic unscheduled inspections by governmental agencies, including the FDA, state authorities and comparable agencies in other countries. Failure to comply with QSR requirements and other applicable regulatory requirements or to respond to any adverse inspectional observations or product safety issues could result in disruption of our operations and manufacturing delays in addition to, among other things, warning letters, significant fines, injunctions, suspension of approvals, seizures, recalls or import holds of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions. As a result, any failure to comply with applicable requirements could adversely affect our product sales and profitability.

21


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


We rely on independent suppliers for raw materials and we could experience inventory shortages if we were required to use an alternative supplier on short notice.

We rely on independent suppliers in our supply chain for key raw materials, consisting primarilypackaging materials and components, mechanical equipment and some finished goods; we could experience inventory shortages if any of these suppliers encounter a manufacturing or distribution disruption

Our businesses utilize various chemicals, packaging materials, components, parts and packaging materials. Rawraw materials used in our operationswhich are generally available from more than one source. However because some products require specialized manufacturing procedures,in certain instances we acquire components and materials from sole or primary suppliers to make our silicone hydrogel contact lens, certain medical devices and IVF products. We also source mechanical equipment and in certain instances finished goods from OEM suppliers. Supply of these goods, items and materials is protected by contractual agreements, availability of alternative suppliers and/or safety stocks. However, if current suppliers fail to supply sufficient goods, items or materials to us on a timely basis, or at all for any reason, we could experience inventory shortages if we were required to use an alternative manufacturer on short notice.and disruption in our supply of products. For example, among other situations, some of the primary material used to make our silicone hydrogel contact lens products, including MyDay, Biofinity, Avaira and clariti, are supplied by a sole supplier. We may suffersupplier, and the failure of a disruption inkey or sole supplier to timely supply sufficient items and materials necessary for the supplymanufacture of our silicone hydrogel contact lens products iflenses could in turn disrupt our suppliers, particularly those which are the sole source of any necessary material, fail to supply sufficient material on a timely basis or at all for any reason and/or we need to switch to an alternative supplier. A disruption in the supply of raw materials could disrupt productionthose lenses to the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of our silicone hydrogel contact lens products, thereby adversely impacting our ability to market and sell such products and our ability to compete in this important segment of the contact lens market.operations.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property adequately, our business could suffer.

We consider our intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets, trademarks and licensing agreements, to be an integral component of our business. We attempt to protect our intellectual property

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


rights through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third-party nondisclosure and assignment agreements. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We also may seek to enforce our intellectual property rights on others through litigation. Our claims, even if meritorious, may be found invalid or inapplicable to a party we believe infringes or has misappropriated our intellectual property rights. In addition, litigation can:

be expensive and time consuming to prosecute or defend;
result in a finding that we do not have certain intellectual property rights or that such rights lack sufficient scope or strength;
divert management's attention and resources; or
require us to license our intellectual property.

We have applied for patent protection in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions relating to certain existing and proposed processes and products. We cannot assure that any of our patent applications will be approved. Patent applications in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions are maintained in secrecy for a period of time, which may last until patents are issued, and since publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature tends to lag behind actual discoveries by several months, we cannot be certain that we will be the first creator of inventions covered by any patent application we make or the first to file patent applications on such inventions. The patents we own could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others and may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with any meaningful protection or commercial advantage. We also cannot assure that we will have adequate resources to enforce our patents.

Both CooperVision and CooperSurgical also rely on proprietary technology which is unpatented. It is possible that others will independently develop the same or similar technology or otherwise obtain access to our unpatented technology. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements and assignment agreements, which generally provide that inventions conceived by the party in the course of rendering services to us will

22


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


be our exclusive property. However, we cannot assure that these confidentiality agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is difficult, expensive and time consuming and the outcome is unpredictable.

We rely on trademarks to establish a market identity for our products. To maintain the value of our trademarks, we might have to file lawsuits against third parties to prevent them from using trademarks confusingly similar to or dilutive of our registered or unregistered trademarks. We also might not obtain registrations for our pending or future trademark applications, and might have to defend our registered trademark and pending applications from challenge by third parties. Enforcing or defending our registered and unregistered trademarks might result in significant litigation costs and damages, including the inability to continue using certain trademarks.

The laws of foreign countries in which we do business or contemplate doing business in the future may not recognize intellectual property rights or protect them to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Adverse determinations in a judicial or administrative proceeding could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products or prevent us from stopping others from manufacturing and

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


selling competing products, and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our products or processes could be subject to claims of infringement of the intellectual property of others.

Our competitors in both the United States and foreign countries, manysome of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, as well as other third parties,
may have applied for or obtained, or may in the future apply for and obtain, patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make and sell our existing and planned products. In the contact lens industry, CooperVision, and its competitors alland other third parties hold patents covering contact lens designs, business methods, processes and materials. Claims that our products, business methods or processes infringe upon the proprietary rights of others often are not asserted until after commencement of commercial sales of products incorporating our technology.

Significant litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in our industries. For example, CooperVision hasin the past faced significant patent litigation over its silicone hydrogel contact lens products. Third parties have made, and may make in the future, claims of infringement against us or our contract manufacturers in connection with the use of our technology. Any claims, even those without merit, could:

be expensive and time consuming to defend;
cause us to cease making, licensing or selling products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
require us to redesign or reengineerre-engineer our products, if feasible;
divert management's attention and resources; or
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements in order to obtain the right to use a necessary product, component or process.
We cannot be certain of the outcome of any litigation. Any royalty or licensing agreement, if required, may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. Our failure to obtain the necessary licenses or other rights could prevent the sale, manufacture, or distribution of some of our products and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business.


23


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


A successful claim of infringement against us or our contract manufacturers in connection with the use of our technology, in particular if we are unable to manufacture or sell any of our planned products in any major market, could adversely affect our business.

We could experience losses from product liability claims or legal claims relating to our service offerings, including such claims and other losses resulting from sales of counterfeit and other infringing products.

We face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in personal injury. We also face the risk that defects in the design or manufacture of our products or sales of counterfeit or other infringing products might necessitate a product recall and other actions by manufacturers, distributors or retailers in order to safeguard the health of consumers and protect the integrity of the subject brand. Additionally, we face the inherent risk of exposure to legal claims, including negligence, relating to our provision of certain service offerings, including our genetic testing services and their accuracy. Consumers may halt or delay purchases of a product or service that is the

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


subject of a claim or recall, or has been counterfeited. We handle some risk with third-party carrier policies that are subject to deductibles and limitations. There can be no assurance that we will not experience material losses due to product liability claims or recalls, legal claims relating to our service offerings, or a decline in sales resulting from sales of counterfeit or other infringing products, in the future.

We face risks related to environmental matters.

Our facilities are subject to a broad range of United States federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and requirements, including those governing discharges to the air and water, the handling or disposal of solid and hazardous substances and wastes, remediation of contamination associated with the release of hazardous substances at our facilities and offsite disposal locations and occupational safety and health. We have made, and will continue to make, expenditures to comply with such laws and requirements. Future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations, or the enforcement thereof, or the discovery of contamination at our facilities, may give rise to additional compliance or remediation costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such laws and requirements are constantly changing, are different in every jurisdiction and can impose substantial fines and sanctions for violations. As a manufacturer of various products, we are exposed to some risk of claims with respect to environmental matters, and there can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred in connection with any such claims.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

We have now and expect to continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness.

Our indebtedness could:

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;

24


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


limit our ability to borrow additional funds; and
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our debt, including our obligation to repay our credit facilities under certain circumstances, or refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms or at all.

Our credit facilities contain financial and other restrictive covenants that could limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debt, which could adversely affect our business, earnings and financial condition.

We are vulnerable to interest rate risk with respect to our debt.

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with the issuance of variable and fixed-rate debt. In order to maintain our desired mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt, we may use interest rate swap agreements and exchange fixed and variable-rate interest payment obligations over the life of the arrangements, without exchange of the underlying principal amounts. We may not be successful in structuring such swap agreements to manage our risks effectively, which could adversely affect our business, earnings and financial condition.

Exchange rate fluctuations and our foreign currency hedges could adversely affect our financial results.

As a result of our international operations, currency exchange rate fluctuations may affect our results of operations and financial position. Our most significant currency exposures are the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen. We expect to generate an increasing portion of our revenue and incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other than U.S. dollars. To the extent we are unable to materially offset non-nonfunctional currency flows, exchange rate fluctuations could have a positive or negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Because our consolidated financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, if we generate sales or earnings in other currencies, the translation of those results into U.S. dollars can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those sales or earnings and can make it more difficult for our shareholders to understand the relative strengths or weaknesses of the underlying business on a period-over-period comparative basis. Although from time to time we enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions to reduce our net exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values relative to our non-functional currency obligations or balances, these hedging transactions do not eliminate that risk entirely.

Increases in our effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of income tax returns could adversely affect our results.

Determination of the Company’s effective tax rate and evaluation of its tax positions is uncertain with rapidly changing enactment, interpretation and enforcement of tax regulations by taxing authorities globally. When tax matters arise, several years may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. Unfavorable resolution of any tax matter in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate could increase the effective tax rate, which would have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results. Any resolution of a tax matter may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being higher than anticipated in countries where the Company haswe have higher statutory rates or lower than anticipated in countries where it haswe have lower statutory rates, by changes in valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or interpretations of those laws. We are also subject to the examination of our income tax returns by other tax authorities and the outcome of these examinations could have a materialan adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

The United Kingdom enacted a new Diverted Profits Tax (DPT) as of April 1, 2015 on profits of multinationals that they deemed artificially diverted from the United Kingdom. The tax rate is 25%. DPT is intended to apply in two situations; (a) where a foreign company has artificially avoided having a taxable presence in the United Kingdom and (b) where a group adopts a structure which lacks economic substance in order to divert profits from the United Kingdom.
The United Kingdom tax authorities (U.K. Tax Authorities) have begun an inquiry regarding the application of DPT to us for fiscal year 2015. We believe that the transactions in question were at arm’s length with no intention to divert profit from the United Kingdom and therefore are outside the intended reach of the DPT.
On December 20, 2017, the U.K. Tax Authorities issued a DPT charging notice of approximately GBP 31 million with respect to the transfer out of the United Kingdom of certain intellectual property rights in

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


connection with the 2014 acquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceutical Ltd. Although the taxes were paid on the transfer, the U.K. Tax Authorities are challenging the value assigned to such property. We have contested the charging notice. The process for resolving such a notice can be lengthy and could involve litigation. The DPT legislation provides a one-year review period; however, it requires prepayment of the charging notice to be made within 30 days of its issuance. As required, the payment of GBP 31.0 million was made on January 19, 2018.

The Company believes final resolution of the transfer value of intellectual property with the U.K. Tax Authorities is imminent. The outcome of final resolution is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. 
We operate globally and changes in tax laws could adversely affect our results.

We operate globallyare subject to income taxes in the United States and various jurisdictions outside of the United States. Our effective tax rate could fluctuate due to changes in the mix of earnings and losses in countries with differing statutory tax rates. Our tax expense could also be impacted by changes in non-deductible expenses, changes in excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and our ability to utilize them, the applicability of withholding taxes and effects from acquisitions.

We are subject to tax examinations in multiple jurisdictions. While we regularly evaluate new information that may change our judgment resulting in recognition, derecognition or change in measurement of a tax position taken, there can be no assurance that the final determination of any examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position.

Our tax provision could also be impacted by changes in accounting principles, and changes in U.S. federal and state or international tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals. For example, the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017 Act) significantly changed income tax laws that affect U.S. corporations. We made significant judgments and assumptions in the interpretation of this new law and in our calculations of the provisional amounts reflected in our financial statements. Consistent with SEC guidance, the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects of the 2017 Act and recorded provisional income tax expense of $214.6 million in the financial statements for fiscal 2018. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other standard-setting bodies may issue guidance on how the provisions of the 2017 Act will be applied or otherwise administered, and additional accounting guidance or interpretations may be issued in the future that is different from our current interpretation. As we further analyze the new law and collect relevant information to complete our computations of the related accounting impact, we may adjust the provisional amounts that could adverselymaterially affect our results. provision for income taxes in the period in which the adjustments are made. In addition, other countries are considering fundamental tax law changes. Any changes in taxing jurisdictions' administrative interpretations, decisions, policies and positions could also impact our tax liabilities.

We have overseas manufacturing,may also be subject to additional tax liabilities and penalties due to changes in non-income based taxes resulting from changes in federal, state or international tax laws, changes in taxing jurisdictions’ administrative interpretations, decisions, policies, and sales offices and generate substantial revenues and profitspositions, results of tax examinations, settlements or judicial decisions, changes in foreign jurisdictions. Recently, a number of countries, including the United States, have proposedaccounting principles, changes to theirthe business operations, including acquisitions, as well as the evaluation of new information that results in a change to a tax position taken in a prior period.

25


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


tax laws, some of which affect taxation of earnings recognized in foreign jurisdictions. Such changes in tax laws or their interpretation, if adopted, could adversely affect our effective tax rates and our results.

Volatility in the securities markets, interest rates, and other factors could substantially increase our defined benefit pension costs.

We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan for employees in the United States. This defined benefit pension plan is funded with trust assets invested in a diversified portfolio of securities and other investments. Changes in interest rates, mortality rates, early retirement rates, investment returns, discount rates and the market value of plan assets can affect the funded status of our defined benefit pension plan and cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost and future funding requirements of the plan. A significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows from operations.

We manage our businesses utilizing complex computerintegrated software and hardware information technology operating systems that are regularly maintained and upgraded; an interruption or disruption to these systems could disrupt our business or force us to expendincur excessive costs.

We utilize complex computerintegrated software and hardware operating systems, including enterprise resource planning and warehouse management systems, to support our business units and we have a continuous improvement strategy in place to keep our systems and overarching technology stable and in line with business needs and growth. Regular upgrades of our computer hardware and software revisions are typical and expected. We employ controlled change management methodologies to plan, test and execute all such system upgrades and improvements, and we believe that we assign adequate staffing and other resources to projects to ensure successful implementation. However, we cannot assure that our systems will meet our future business needs or that upgrades will operate as designed. We cannot assure that there will not be associated excessive costs or disruptions in portions of our business in the course of our maintenance, support and/or upgrade of these systems.

We are just beginningin the midst of a six year or moremultiyear process of implementing a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system at CooperVision. Implementing a new ERP system is not only costly but complex and difficult. Implementing a new ERP system can negatively affect not only financial accounting and reporting processes but also external commercial activities such as order receipt and product delivery. We cannot assure youThere can be no assurance that we will successfully implement our new ERP system or that we will avoid these and other negative impacts from our implementation efforts.

We attemptCybersecurity threats continue to protectincrease in frequency and sophistication; a successful cybersecurity attack could interrupt or disrupt our computerinformation technology systems or cause the loss of confidential or protected data which could disrupt our business, force us to incur excessive costs or cause reputational harm.

The size and communicationscomplexity of our information systems but may experiencemake such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and breaches including computer viruses, malicious software, cyberattacksare made by groups and "hacking,”individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent or quickly identify service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could impairadversely affect our ability to conduct business and communicate internally and with our customers, operations and/or result in the theftloss of trade secretscritical or other misappropriation of assets,sensitive confidential information or otherwise compromise privacyintellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. We maintain cyber liability insurance; however, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover the financial, legal, business or reputational losses that may result from an interruption or breach of our sensitive information, or that of our customers or other business partners.systems.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



If we do not retain our key personnel and attract and retain other highly skilled employees, our business could suffer.

If we fail to recruit, develop and retain the necessary personnel, our business and our ability to obtain new customers, develop new products and provide acceptable levels of customer service could suffer. The success of our business is heavily dependent on the leadership of our key management personnel. Our success also depends on our ability to recruit, develop and retain and motivate highly skilled sales, marketing, engineering and scientific personnel. Competition for these persons in our industry is intense, and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain qualified personnel.

26


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Provisions of our governing documents and Delaware law, and our rights plan, may have anti-takeover effects.

Certain provisions of our Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws may inhibit changes in control of the Company not approved by our Board of Directors. These provisions include: (i)include advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations and (ii) the authority of our board to issue without stockholder approval preferred stock with such terms as our board may determine.nominations. We also have the protections of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which could have similaranti-takeover effects. Our Board of Directors extended our preferred stock purchase rights plan, commonly known as a “poison pill,” pursuant to an amended rights agreement dated as of October 29, 2007, that expires on October 29, 2017. The rights agreement is intended to prevent abusive hostile takeover attempts by requiring a potential acquirer to negotiate the terms of an acquisition with our Board of Directors. However, it could have the effect of deterring or preventing an acquisition of our Company, even if a majority of our stockholders would be in favor of such acquisition, and could also have the effect of making it more difficult for a person or group to gain control of the Company or to change existing management.

Risks Relating to Government Regulation of Manufacture and Sale of Our Products and Services

Our failure to comply with regulatory requirements or to receive regulatory clearance or approval for our products or operations could adversely affect our business.

Our products and operations are subject to rigorous regulation by the FDA, and numerous other federal, state and foreign governmental authorities. In the United States, the FDA regulates virtually all aspects of a medical device'sdevice and pharmaceutical design, development, testing, manufacture, safety, labeling (including, for example, unique device identifier regulations), storage, recordkeeping, reporting, marketing, promotion, advertising and distribution, as well as product import and export. Our failure to comply with FDA regulations could lead to the imposition of administrative or judicial sanctions, including injunctions, fines, warning letters, suspensions or the loss of regulatory approvals, product recalls, termination of distribution or product seizures. In the most egregious cases, criminal sanctions or closure of our manufacturing facilities are possible.

Our medical devices and pharmaceutical products require clearance or approval by the FDA before they can be commercially distributed in the United States and may require similar approvals by foreign regulatory agencies before distribution in foreign jurisdictions. Medical devices and drug products may only be marketed for the indications for which they are approved or cleared. The process of obtaining, renewing and maintaining regulatory clearances and approvals to market a medical device, particularly from the FDA, can be costly and time consuming. There can be no assurance that such clearances and approvals will be granted on a timely basis, if at all, and significant delays in the introduction of any new products or product enhancements may occur, which could adversely affect our competitive position and results of operations. In addition, the FDA and authorities in foreign jurisdictions may change their policies, adopt additional regulations or revise existing regulations, each of which could prevent or delay premarket approval or clearance of our products, increase the cost of compliance, impose additional regulatory requirements on us, or couldotherwise impact our ability to market our currently approved or cleared products. For example, the FDA recently has been reviewing the premarket clearance process in response to internal and external concerns regarding the 510(k) premarket clearance program. In January 2011, the FDA announced a plan of action that included twenty-five action items designed to make the process more rigorous and transparent. Since then the FDA has implemented some changes intended to improve its premarket programs. Some of the changes and proposals under consideration could impose additional regulatory requirements on us that could delay our ability to obtain new 510(k) clearances for our products, increase the cost of compliance, or restrict our ability to maintain our current clearances.


27


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Modifications and enhancements to a medical devicedevices and drug products also require a new FDA clearance or approval if they could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness or would constitute a major change

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


in its intended use, design or manufacture. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review any manufacturer's decision. We have made modifications and enhancements to our medical devices that we do not believe require a new clearance or application, but we cannot confirm that the FDA will agree with our decisions. If the FDA requires us to seek clearance or approval for a modification of a previously cleared product for which we have concluded that new clearances or approvals are unnecessary, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified product until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and competitive position. We also cannot assure that we will be successful in obtaining clearances or approvals for our modifications, if required.

Even if regulatory approval or clearance of a medical device is granted, the FDA may impose limitations or restrictions on the uses and indications for which the device may be labeled and promoted, andAny failure to comply with FDAongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to commercialize and generate revenue from our product candidates. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn, the value of our company and our operating results may be adversely affected.

The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change and additional government regulations prohibiting a manufacturer from promoting a device for an unapproved,may be enacted that could prevent, limit or “off-label” use could resultdelay regulatory approval of our product candidates. For example, in enforcement action byDecember 2016, the FDA, including,21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act), was signed into law. The Cures Act, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees,is intended to modernize the regulation of drugs and civilmedical devices and spur innovation, but its ultimate implementation is unclear. If we are slow or criminal penalties.unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States, such as new policies introduced by the Trump Administration, or abroad.

Increased regulatory scrutiny and negative opinion of genetic testing may adversely affect our business through increased costs and risks associated with gaining marketing approvals and potential decreased demand for our genetic testing services.

With our acquisition of Reprogenetics in August 2015, we nowWe offer certain genetic testing services to help identify the likelihood of pregnancy as well as identify possible disorders or diseases of a child prior to birth. LegislativeRegulatory and legislative proposals addressing oversight of genetic testing have been introduced in the United States, and we expect that new legislative proposals will be introduced from time to time both in the United States and in foreign countries in the future. Although the FDA has statutory authority to assure that medical devices, including IVDs, are safe and effective for their intended uses, the FDA has historically exercised its enforcement discretion and not enforced applicable provisions of the FDCA and regulations with respect to LDT. We cannot provide any assurance that FDA regulation or regulation by foreign regulatory authorities, including pre-market review, willbelieve our tests fall within the definition of an LDT. As a result, we believe our tests are not be required forcurrently subject to the FDA’s enforcement of its medical device regulations and the applicable FDCA provisions. However, our genetic tests may in the future orbecome subject to more onerous regulation by the FDA. Legislative proposals addressing the FDA’s oversight of LDTs have been introduced by Congress in the past and new legislative proposals may be introduced from time to time in the future. The likelihood that other increased regulatory burdensCongress will not be imposed on our genetic tests or any new genetic tests we may develop. If pre-market review is required, our genetic test business will be negatively impacted untilpass such review is completed and approval or clearance is obtained,legislation and the FDA or other foreign regulatory authoritiesextent to which such legislation may require that we stop selling our genetic tests pending pre-market approval or clearance. In addition to these regulatory burdens, ouraffect the FDA’s ability to sellenforce its medical device regulations with respect to certain LDTs is difficult to predict at this time. If the FDA ultimately begins to enforce its medical device requirements with respect to LDTs, our genetic tests may be negatively impactedsubject to additional regulatory requirements imposed by public perceptionthe FDA, the nature and socialextent of which would depend upon applicable final guidance or cultural norms. The information obtained fromregulation by the FDA or instruction by Congress. If the FDA imposes

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


significant changes to the regulation of LDTs it could reduce our genetic tests could be used in a varietyrevenue or increase our costs and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of applications, which may have underlying ethical, legal, and social concerns regarding privacy and the appropriate uses of the resulting information which in turnoperations or financial condition.

Any new FDA enforcement policies affecting LDTs or new legislation, regulations or guidance may result in increased regulation and/regulatory burdens on our ability to continue marketing our products and to develop and introduce new products in the future, which could reduce our revenue or decreased demand.increase our costs and adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state, local and foreign laboratory licensing requirements, we could lose the ability to perform our tests or experience disruptions to our business.

We are subject to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), a federal law regulating clinical laboratories that perform testing on specimens derived from humans for the purpose of providing information for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of disease. Our clinical laboratory must be certified under CLIA in order for us to perform testing on human specimens. In addition, our proprietary tests must also be recognized as part of our accredited programs under CLIA so that we can offer them in our laboratory. CLIA is intended to ensure the quality and reliability of clinical laboratories in the United States by mandating specific standards in the areas of personnel qualifications, administration, and participation in proficiency testing, patient test management, quality control, quality assurance and inspections. The law also requires us to maintain a state laboratory license to conduct testing in that state. Our laboratories are located in the United States, and internationally in Canada and the United Kingdom, and we must maintain the requisite licenses in each jurisdiction.

Development and marketing of our products are subject to strict governmental regulation by foreign regulatory agencies, and failure to receive, or delay in receiving, foreign qualifications could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In many of the foreign countries in which we market our products, we are subject to regulations affecting, among other things, product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, import restrictions, tariff regulations, the reporting of certain payments to health care practitioners in certain markets (for example, the French Sunshine Act of 2013), duties and tax requirements. Many of the regulations applicable to our devices and products in such countries are similar to those of the FDA.

In the European Economic Area, a medical device can only be placed on the market if it is in conformity with the essential requirements set out in the European Directives and implementing regulations that govern

28


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


medical devices. These Directives prescribe quality programs and standards which must be maintained in order to achieve required ISO certification and to approve the use of CE marking. In order to maintain ISO certification and CE marking quality benchmarks, firms' quality systems and procedures are subjected to rigorous periodic inspections and reassessment audits.

In many countries, the national health or social security organizations require our products to be qualified before they can be marketed with the benefit of reimbursement eligibility. To date, we have not experienced difficulty in complying with these regulations. However, our failure to receive, or delays in the receipt of, relevant foreign qualifications could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our products are subject to reporting requirements and recalls, even after receiving regulatory clearance or approval, which could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply, including the FDA's QSR regulations, which require manufacturers to follow, among other things, design, testing, production, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during the manufacturing process; labeling regulations, which prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved or “off-label” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling; and medical device reporting regulations that require us to report to FDA or similar governmental bodies in other countries if our products may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunction in a way that would be reasonably likely to contribute to death or serious

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


injury if the malfunction were to recur. The FDA and similar governmental bodies in other countries have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture or in the event that a product poses an unacceptable risk to health. Medical device manufacturers, such as CooperVision and CooperSurgical, may, under their own initiative, recall a product if a reasonable possibility of serious injury or any material deficiency in a device is found, or withdraw a product to improve device performance or for other reasons. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within 10 working days after the recall is initiated. Recalls of any of our products may divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A recall could harm our reputation with customers and consumers which could reduce the sales of our products. In addition, the FDA or other foreign governmental agencies may implement enforcement actions in connection with a recall which could impair our product offerings and be harmful to our business and financial results.

Changes in legislation and government regulation of the healthcarehealth care industry both in the United States and internationally, as well as third-party payors' efforts to control the costs of healthcarehealth care could materially adversely affect our business.
 
In recent years, an increasing number of healthcare reform proposals have been formulated by the legislative and executive branches of the United States federal and state governments. In March 2010, the President signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (Affordable Care Act). The Affordable Care Act makesACA made extensive changes to the delivery of health care in the United States. Among the provisions of the Affordable Care Act,ACA, of greatest importance to the medical device industry and pharmaceutical industry are the following:
A 2.3 percent excise tax on any entity that manufactures or imports medical devices offered for sale in the United States, with limited exceptions, which exceptions include all contact lenses;
Establishment of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research;
Reporting and disclosure requirements on medical device manufacturers for certain payments or other “transfer of value” made or distributed to prescribers and other healthcare providers, and any ownership

29


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


and investment interests held by physicians or their immediate
Reporting and disclosure requirements on medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers for certain payments or other “transfers of value” made to physicians and physicians family members, certain healthcare facilities, and any ownership and investment interests held by physicians and physician family members, and any payments or other “transfers of value” to such owners. Manufacturers are required to submit reports to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) by the 90th day of each calendar year;
Absent new legislation, a 2.3 percent excise tax, currently suspended, will be reinstated as of January 1, 2020, on any entity that manufactures or imports medical devices offered for sale in the United States, with limited exceptions, which exceptions include all contact lenses;
Payment system reforms including a national pilot program on payment bundling to encourage hospitals, physicians and other providers to improve the coordination, quality and efficiency of certain healthcarehealth care services through bundled payment models;
Creation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board which has authority to recommend certain changes to reduce Medicare spending and those recommendations could have the effect of law even if Congress doesn't act on the recommendations; and
Establishment of a Center for Medicare Innovation at CMS to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending.spending; and
An increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to 23.1% and 13% of the average manufacturer price for most branded and generic drugs, respectively.

These measures could result in decreased net revenues or increased expenses from our medical devicefertility, office and surgical products and decrease potential returns from our development efforts. At this time,There have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the fullACA, and we expect there will be additional

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. Additionally, recent reform proposals have introduced greater uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs and government regulations affecting trade between the United States and other countries. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations could have a material effect that the Affordable Care Act would have on our business remains unclear. For example, the Affordable Care Act imposes a new excise taxbalance sheet and results of 2.3 percent of the price for which certain medical devices are sold, which went into effect on January 1, 2013. CooperVision is not affected by this tax because contact lenses are excluded from the tax. However, United States sales of a significant portion of CooperSurgical's products are subject to this tax.operations.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. On August 2, 2011, the President signed into law theThe Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend proposals in spending reductions to Congress. The Joint Select Committee did not achieve its targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, triggering the legislation’s automatic reductions to several government programs. These reductions include aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and, due to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015,subsequent legislative amendments, will remain in effect until 2025 unless additional action is taken by Congress. On January 2, 2013, President Obama signed into law theThe American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers. In addition, on April 16, 2015, President Obama signed into law the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, or MACRA, which among other things, repealed the formula by which Medicare made annual payment adjustments to physicians and replaced the former formula with fixed annual updates and a new system of incentive payments scheduled to begin in 2019 that are based on various performance measures and physicians’ participation in alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations.

We expect that additional state and federal healthcarehealth care reform measures will be adopted in the future, including those initiatives affecting coverage and reimbursement for our products, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcarehealth care products and services, which could adversely affect the growth of the market for our products or demand for our products, or result in additional pricing pressures. Also, any adoption of healthcarehealth care reform proposals on a state-by-state basis could require us to develop state-specific marketing and sales approaches. We cannot predict the effect such reforms or the prospect of their enactment may have on our business.

In addition, third-party payors, whether governmental or commercial, whether inside the United States or abroad, increasingly attempt to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare.health care. These cost-control methods include prospective payment systems, capitated rates, group purchasing, redesign of benefits, requiring pre-authorizations or second opinions prior to certain medical procedures, encouragement of healthier lifestyles and exploration of more cost-effective methods of delivering healthcare.health care. Although cost controls or other

30


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


requirements imposed by third-party payors have not historically had a significant effect on contact lens prices or distribution practices, this could change in the future and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may enroll as in-network providers and suppliers with certain payors. Although, becoming an in-network provider or enrolling as a supplier means that we have agreed with these payors to provide certain of our tests at negotiated rates, it does not obligate any physicians to order our tests or guarantee that we will receive reimbursement for our tests from these or any other payors at adequate levels. Thus, these payor relationships, or any similar relationships we may establish in the future, may not result in acceptable levels of reimbursement for our tests or meaningful increases in our physician customer base. We cannot predict whether, under what circumstances, or at what payment levels payors will cover and reimburse for our tests. If we fail to establish and maintain broad coverage and reimbursement for our tests, our ability to generate increased revenue and grow our test volume and customer base could be limited and our future prospects and our business could suffer.

On April 5, 2017, the European Parliament passed the Medical Devices Regulation, which repeals and replaces the EU Medical Devices Directive. Unlike directives, which must be implemented into the

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


national laws of the European Economic Area (EEA) member states, the regulations would be directly applicable (i.e., without the need for adoption of EEA member State laws implementing them) in all EEA member states and are intended to eliminate current differences in the regulation of medical devices among EEA member states. The Medical Devices Regulation, among other things, is intended to establish a uniform, transparent, predictable and sustainable regulatory framework across the EEA for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices and ensure a high level of safety and health while supporting innovation.

The Medical Devices Regulation will, however, only become applicable in 2020 and the In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation will become applicable in 2022. Once applicable, the new regulations will among other things:

strengthen the rules on placing devices on the market and reinforce surveillance once they are available;

establish explicit provisions on manufacturers' responsibilities for the follow-up of the quality, performance and safety of devices placed on the market;

improve the traceability of medical devices throughout the supply chain to the end-user or patient through a unique identification number;

set up a central database to provide patients, healthcare professionals and the public with comprehensive information on products available in the EU; and

strengthen rules for the assessment of certain high-risk devices, such as implants, which may have to undergo an additional check by experts before they are placed on the market.
These modifications may have an impact on the way we conduct our business in the EEA and an adverse impact on our overall business operations and financial results.

The costs of complying with the requirements of federal and state laws pertaining to the privacy and security of health information and the potential liability associated with failure to do so could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

OtherState and federal legislation affectslaws and regulations, including the manner in which we use and disclose health information. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 or HIPAA, mandates, among other things,(HIPAA) govern the adoption of standards for the electronic exchange of health information that may require significantcollection, dissemination, use, privacy, confidentiality, security, availability and costly changes to current practices. The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has released several rules mandating the use of specified standards with respect to certain healthcare transactions and health information. The electronic transactions rule requires the use of uniform standards for common healthcare transactions, including healthcare claims information, plan eligibility, referral certification and authorization, claims status, plan enrollment and disenrollment, payment and remittance advice, plan premium payments and coordination of benefits. The privacy rule imposes standards governing the use and disclosureintegrity of individually identifiable information, including protected health information. Theinformation (PHI). HIPAA establishes basic national privacy and security rule released by HHS establishes minimum standards for the securityprotection of electronic health information, and requires the adoption of administrative, physical and technical safeguards.

Additionally, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 was signed into law as part of the America's Recovery and Reinvestment Act in February 2009. The Final Omnibus Privacy, Security, Breach Notification and Enforcement Rules (Omnibus Final Rule), implementing HIPAA and HITECH, became effective in September 2013. Previously, HIPAA directly regulated only certainPHI by covered entities such as health care providers and health plans. Under the HITECH Actour genetics testing subsidiaries and the Omnibus Final Rule, certain of HIPAA's privacy and security standards are now also directly applicable to covered entities' business associates. As a result, business associates are now subject to civil and criminal penaltieswith whom such entities contract for failure to comply with applicable privacy and security rule requirements. Moreover, the HITECH Act and the Omnibus Final Rule set forth new notification requirements and standards for health data security breaches, increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered entities, business associates and possibly other persons, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorney's fees and costs associated with pursuing federal actions. While there is no private rightservices, including another one of action under HIPAA that would allow individuals to sue in civil court for violations, HIPAA’s standards have been used as the basis for the duty of care in state civil suits, such as those for negligence or recklessness in misusing individuals’ health information. Further, varying state laws governing the use and disclosure of PII may be more restrictive than HIPAA, which means that entities subject to them must comply with the more restrictive state law in addition to complying with HIPAA. In some cases, a breach may be required to be reported under state law and affected individuals notified, even if the breach is not reportable or subject to breach notification requirements under HIPAA. State laws may impose separate fines and penalties upon violators, and some, unlike HIPAA, may afford a private right of action to state residents who believe their information has been misused.
With the possible exception of one our subsidiaries, Eye Care Prime LLC, which offers value-added software solutions for eye care professionals, which we believe has implemented adequate security measures, we do not believeprofessionals. HIPAA requires both covered entities and business associates to develop and maintain policies and procedures for PHI that is used or disclosed, and to adopt administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect PHI. When we are a covered entity oracting as a business associate, under HIPAA. However, many of our customers may beclients that are covered entities or business associates subjectare mandated by HIPAA to HIPAA. Some customers as an expectation of transacting businessenter into written agreements with us may- known as business associate agreements - that require us to safeguard PHI in accordance with HIPAA. Our genetics testing subsidiaries are likewise required to enter into business associate agreements which would obligate us to safeguard and restrict the manner in which we use certain protected health information (as defined by HIPAA) that we obtain in the coursewith any of our commercial relationship with them, triggering potential liabtheir business associates.

31


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


ility on usMandatory penalties for failureHIPAA violations can be significant. A single breach incident can result in violations of multiple standards. If a person knowingly or intentionally obtains or discloses PHI in violation of HIPAA requirements, criminal penalties may also be imposed.
We maintain safeguards that we believe are reasonable and appropriate to meetprotect the privacy and security of PHI and other personally identifiable information consistent with applicable law and our contractual obligations. Alternatively, some customersobligations; however, our systems may limit the scopebe vulnerable to physical break-ins, viruses, hackers, and other potential sources of our commercial relationship with them with regardsecurity breaches. In addition, we may not be able to ourprevent incidences of inappropriate use or unauthorized access to certain protected health information. If the government determines that wePHI by our employees or contractors. Any such breaches could result in exposure to liability under federal and state laws and/or under our contractual arrangements and could adversely impact our business.

We are a covered entity or a business associate, we could be faced with additional costs related to HIPAA compliance andalso subject to governmental enforcementlaws and regulations in countries other than United States covering data privacy and the protection of health-related and other personal information. EU member states and other jurisdictions have adopted data protection laws and regulations, which impose significant compliance obligations. For example, the EU Data Protection Directive, as implemented into national laws by the EU member states, imposes strict obligations and restrictions on the processing of personal data. The new EU-wide General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) entered into force in May 2016 and became applicable on May 25, 2018, replacing the current data protection laws of each EU member state. The GDPR implemented more stringent operational requirements for processors and controllers of personal data, including, for example, expanded disclosures about how personal information is to be used, limitations on retention of information, increased requirements pertaining to health data and pseudonymised (i.e., key-coded) data, mandatory data breach notification requirements and higher standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities.
Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with HIPAA,privacy or security laws, policies, legal obligations or industry standards or any security incident that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information may result in governmental enforcement actions and investigations including by European Data Protection Authorities, fines and penalties (for example, of up to 20,000,000 Euros or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year (whichever is higher) under the GDPR and ePrivacy Regulation), litigation and/or adverse publicity, including by consumer advocacy groups, and could cause our customers to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business. Such failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and resultsoperations. If the third parties we work with violate applicable laws, contractual obligations or suffer a security breach, such violations may also put us in breach of operationsour obligations under privacy laws and reputation.regulations and/or could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business.

Laws pertaining to healthcarehealth care fraud and abuse could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be subject to various federal, state and foreign laws pertaining to healthcarehealth care fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws, physician self-referral laws and false claims laws. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcarehealth care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration health programs and TRICARE. Similarly, if the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we do business are found to be non-compliant with applicable laws, they may be subject to sanctions, which could indirectly have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we believe that our operations are in material compliance with such laws, because of the complex

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


and far-reaching nature of these laws, there can be no assurance that we would not be required to alter one or more of our practices to be in compliance with these laws.

Indeed, changes in state laws and model codes of ethics have required us to alter certain of our compliance efforts. For example, in April of 2009, Massachusetts issued regulations governing the conduct of pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers with respect to healthcare practitioners. This regulation became effective on July 1, 2009 andhealth care practitioners that sets forth what medical device manufacturers may and may not permissibly do with respect to providing meals, sponsoring continuing medical education and otherwise providing payments or items of economic benefit to healthcarehealth care practitioners located within the state. Additionally, the regulation requires medical device manufacturers to have in place robust fraud and abuse compliance programs. Other states (e.g., California, Vermont and Nevada) have adopted similar laws. These laws and regulations act to limit our marketing practices, require the dedication of resources to ensure compliance, and expose us to additional liabilities.

In addition, the recent Affordable Care Act,ACA, among other things, amendsamended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and certain criminal healthcarehealth care fraud statutes so that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. The Affordable Care ActACA also provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of these statutes constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the civil False Claims Act or the civil monetary penalties statute. In addition, federal government price reporting laws, changed by the ACA to, among other things, increase the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and offer such rebates to additional populations, that require us to calculate and report complex pricing metrics to government programs, where such reported prices may be used in the calculation of reimbursement and/or discounts on our marketed drugs. Participation in these programs and compliance with the applicable requirements may subject us to potentially significant discounts on our products, increased infrastructure costs and potentially limit our ability to offer certain marketplace discounts.

Any violations of these laws or regulations could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes in these laws, regulations, or administrative or judicial interpretations, may require us to further change our business practices or subject our existing business practices to legal challenges, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Ethical, legal and social concerns related to the use of genetic information could reduce demand for our tests.

Genetic testing has raised ethical, legal and social issues regarding privacy and the appropriate uses of the resulting information. Government authorities could, for social or other purposes, limit or regulate the use of genetic information or genetic testing or prohibit testing for genetic predisposition to certain conditions, particularly for those that have no known cure. Similarly, these concerns may lead patients to refuse to use, or physicians to be reluctant to order, genetic tests even if permissible. These and other ethical, legal and social concerns may limit market acceptance and adoption of our tests or reduce the potential markets for our tests, either of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.


32


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 2. Properties.

The following is a summary of Cooper's principal facilities as of October 31, 2015.2018. We generally lease our office and operations facilities but own several manufacturing and research and development facilities, including 205,850224,533 square feet in Hamble,the United Kingdom, 49,500164,946 square feet in Scottsville, New York,Costa Rica, 63,787 square feet in Malov, Denmark, 73,434 square feet in New York, and 33,630 square feet in Stafford, Texas. Our lease agreements expire at various dates through the year 2045. We believe our properties are suitable and adequate for our businesses.

Location
Approximate
Square Feet
 Operations
AMERICAS   
United States:   
     California112,109103,990
 Executive offices; CooperVision research & development and administrative offices; CooperSurgical manufacturing and distributionoffices
     New York377,507427,331
 CooperVision manufacturing, marketing, distribution and administrative officesoffices; CooperSurgical manufacturing
     Connecticut291,237265,437
 CooperSurgical manufacturing, marketing, distribution, research & development and administrative offices
     Texas36,113
CooperSurgical manufacturing
Puerto Rico510,792509,284
 CooperVision manufacturing and distribution
Costa Rica164,946
CooperVision and CooperSurgical manufacturing and office
Brazil16,576
 CooperVision marketing and distribution
Canada11,64721,055
 CooperVision marketingand CooperSurgical office
Other Americas69,295198,991
 CooperVision marketing and distribution; CooperSurgical manufacturing and marketing
    
EMEA   
United Kingdom666,157792,529
 CooperVision manufacturing, marketing, distribution, research & development and administrative offices; CooperSurgical marketing
Belgium171,400
CooperVision distribution
Denmark63,787
CooperSurgical manufacturing, marketing and administrative offices
Germany27,949
CooperVision marketing and distribution; CooperSurgical manufacturing, marketing and distribution
Hungary150,302333,470
 CooperVision manufacturing and marketing
Belgium256,478
CooperVision distribution
Spain180,058
CooperVision distribution and administrative offices; CooperSurgical marketing
Denmark94,585
CooperSurgical manufacturing, marketing, administrative, research and development offices
Other EMEA141,474167,124
 CooperVision and CooperSurgical marketing and distribution
    
ASIA PACIFIC   
Japan73,93298,015
 CooperVision manufacturing, marketing, distribution and administrative offices; CooperSurgical marketing
Australia29,95243,416
 CooperVision manufacturing, marketing, distribution and administrative offices; CooperSurgical marketing
Other Asia Pacific65,11774,473
 CooperVision and CooperSurgical marketing and distribution

33


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

On or about November 11, 2014, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (JJVC) filed an action in the district court of Dusseldorf, Germany, against CooperVision GmbH and CooperVision, Inc. (collectively “CooperVision” or “we”) for patent infringement. In the action, JJVC alleged that certain CooperVision products infringe JJVC’s European Patent No. EP 1 754 728 B1, and was seeking damages and to enjoin these products from selling in Germany. We were challenging the validity of the patent before the European Patent Office.

In July 2015, CooperVision made a one-time lump sum payment to JJVC of $17.0 million to settle our existing patent disputes. As a result of the settlement, we withdrew our opposition to the JJVC patent filed before the European Patent Office, and JJVC withdrew its complaint of infringement pending before the district court of Dusseldorf, Germany. The settlement included worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual and royalty-free cross-licenses between the parties to certain patents including the JJVC patent referenced above. The settlement also included reciprocal covenants not to sue on those patents which were not licensed with respect to each party’s current, core commercialized product offerings, including all silicone hydrogel lenses. Neither party admitted any liability as part of the settlement.

Since March 2015, over 50 putative class action complaints were filed by contact lens consumers alleging that contact lens manufacturers, in conjunction with their respective Unilateral Pricing Policy (UPP), conspired to reach agreements between each other and certain distributors and retailers regarding the prices at which certain contact lenses could be sold to consumers. The plaintiffs are seeking damages against CooperVision, Inc., other contact lens manufacturers, distributors and retailers, in various courts around the United States. In June 2015, all of the class action cases were consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. In August 2017, CooperVision deniesentered into a settlement agreement with the allegationsplaintiffs, without any admission of liability, to settle all claims against CooperVision. In July 2018, the Court approved the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, and intendsthe Company paid the $3.0 million settlement amount into an escrow account. The settlement remains subject to defendfinal Court approval at a future hearing to be set by the actions vigorously. We areCourt.

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and other legal matters from time to time that arise in the ordinary course of conducting business, including matters involving our products, intellectual property, supplier relationships, distributors, competitor relationships, employees and other matters. The Company does not inbelieve that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings or claims pending against it could have a position to assess whether any loss ormaterial adverse effect on ourits financial condition or results of operations. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.and reasonably estimable under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 450, Contingencies. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.

34


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Cooper's common stock, par value $0.10 per share, is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “COO.” In the table that follows, we indicate the high and low selling prices of our common stock for each three-month period of 2015 and 2014:
 2015 2014
Quarterly Common Stock Price Range
Years Ended October 31,
High Low High Low
Fiscal Quarter Ended       
January 31$171.54
 $154.21
 $135.00
 $118.58
April 30$190.00
 $154.80
 $145.34
 $116.95
July 31$186.37
 $170.50
 $163.24
 $127.02
October 31$179.75
 $136.75
 $166.52
 $143.62

At November 30, 2015,2018, there were 454355 common stockholders of record.

Dividend Policy

Our current policy is to pay annual cash dividends on our common stock of $0.06 per share, in two semiannual payments of $0.03 per share each. In dollar terms, we paid cash for dividends of about $2.9 million in each of fiscal 20152018 and $2.9 million in fiscal 2014.2017. Dividends are paid when, as and if declared at the discretion of our Board of Directors from funds legally available for that purpose. Our Board of Directors periodically reviews our dividend policy and considers the Company's earnings, financial condition, liquidity needs, business plans and opportunities and other factors in making and setting dividend policy.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total return on Cooper common stock with the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's Midcap 400Poor 500 and the Standard & Poor's Health Care Equipment Index for the five-year period ended October 31, 2015. The graph also includes the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor's Smallcap 600 Stock Index as we presented this information in prior years but now consider the comparison to the Standard & Poor's Midcap 400 as a more appropriate comparison to our size and position in the market.2018. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in Cooper and in each index was $100 on October 31, 2010,2013, and assumes that all dividends were reinvested.


35


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among The Cooper Companies, Inc., the S&P Smallcap 600 Index,
the S&P Midcap 400500 Index and the S&P Health Care Equipment Index
a5yearreturn.jpg

*$100 invested on 10/31/1013 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending October 31.
Copyright© 2015 S&P,2018 Standard & Poor's, a division of McGraw-Hill Financial.S&P Global. All rights reserved.
10/10 10/11 10/12 10/13 10/14 10/15October 2013 October 2014 October 2015 October 2016 October 2017 October 2018
The Cooper Companies, Inc.$100.00
 $140.58
 $194.86
 $262.47
 $333.08
 $309.74
$100.00
 $126.90
 $118.01
 $136.41
 $186.22
 $200.26
S&P Smallcap 600$100.00
 $110.54
 $125.57
 $174.65
 $190.88
 $196.32
S&P Midcap 400$100.00
 $108.55
 $121.69
 $162.44
 $181.37
 $187.57
S&P 500$100.00
 $117.27
 $123.37
 $128.93
 $159.40
 $171.11
S&P Health Care Equipment$100.00
 $106.59
 $121.70
 $152.79
 $190.35
 $207.56
$100.00
 $124.58
 $135.85
 $153.67
 $192.06
 $225.13




36


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During
The Company's share repurchase activity during the three-month period ended October 31, 2015, we repurchased shares of our common stock2018, was as follows:
Period 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 
Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
8/1/15 – 8/31/15 
 $
 
 $169,700,000
9/1/15 – 9/30/15 
 $
 
 $169,700,000
10/1/15 – 10/31/15 367,539
 $139.60
 367,539
 $118,400,000
Total 367,539
 

 367,539
  
Period 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 
Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
8/1/18 – 8/31/18 
 $
 
 $563,500,000
9/1/18 – 9/30/18 
 $
 
 $563,500,000
10/1/18 – 10/31/18 
 $
 
 $563,500,000
Total 
   
  

The transactions described in the table above represent the repurchase of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange as part of the share repurchase program approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in December 2011 (2012 Share Repurchase Program). The program as amended in December 2012 and December 2013 provides authorization for a total of $500.0 million. In March 2017, the program was amended and approved by the Company's Board of Directors for an increase of $500.0 million, providing authorization for a total of $1.0 billion. Purchases under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program may be made from time-to-time on the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions and are subject to a review of the circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. This program has no expiration date and may be discontinued at any time.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, there were no repurchases of shares of common stock under the repurchase program. At October 31, 2015, the remaining repurchase authorization2018, approximately $563.5 million remained authorized under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program was approximately $118.4 million.Program.



37


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth certain information as of October 31, 2018, concerning the shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under any form of award granted under our equity compensation plans in effect as of October 31, 2018:
Plan Category
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)
(A)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(B)
 
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column A)
(C)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)
(A)
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(B)
 
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column A)
(C)
Equity compensation plans
approved by shareholders(2)
1,866,494 $79.85 943,5221,692,007 $160.31 1,572,390
Equity compensation plans not
approved by shareholders
    
Total1,866,494 $79.85 943,5221,692,007 $160.31 1,572,390


(1)The amount of totaltotal securities to be issued under Company equity plans upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights shown in Column A includes 516,206487,314 Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Company's equity plans. These awards allow for the distribution of shares to the grant recipient upon the completion of time-based holdingvesting periods. The total also includes 29,850 shares to be issued pursuant to Performance Share Awards which previously vested and receipt of shares was deferred for a specified period of time and 229,907117,695 shares representing the maximum number of shareshares that may be issued subject to Performance Share Awards without a defined payout.outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year. Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Awards do not have an associated exercise price. Accordingly, these awards are not reflected in the weighted-average exercise price disclosed in Column B.

(2) Includes information with respect to the SecondThird Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Employees of the Cooper Companies, Inc. ("2007 Plan")(2007 LTIP), which was approved by stockholders on March 16, 2011,17, 2016, and provides for the issuance of up to 5,230,0006,930,000 shares of Common Stock, and the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of the Cooper Companies, Inc. (the “Directors’ Plan”)(2006 Directors Plan), which was approved by stockholders on March 16, 2011 and provides for the issuance of up to 950,000 shares of Common Stock. As of October 31, 2015, 757,7472018, 1,441,896 shares remained available under the 2007 PlanLTIP and 185,775130,494 shares remained available under the 2006 Directors’Directors Plan.




38


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
 
Five Year Financial Highlights
 
Years Ended October 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts)
2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Consolidated Operations                  
Net sales$1,797,060
 $1,717,776
 $1,587,725
 $1,445,136
  $1,330,835
$2,532.8
 $2,139.0
 $1,966.8
 $1,797.1
 $1,717.8
Gross profit$1,070,262
 $1,091,570
 $1,026,808
 $924,010
  $804,804
$1,632.3
 $1,365.8
 $1,173.1
 $1,070.3
 $1,091.6
Income before income taxes$215,485
 $296,534
 $312,271
 $275,452
  $192,764
$331.9
 $394.0
 $295.6
 $215.5
 $296.5
Net income attributable to
Cooper stockholders
$203,523
 $269,856
 $296,151
 $248,339
  $175,430
$139.9
 $372.9
 $273.9
 $203.5
 $269.9
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders$4.14
 $5.51
 $5.96
 $5.05
  $3.63
$2.81
 $7.52
 $5.59
 $4.14
 $5.51
Number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share49,179
 48,960
 49,685
 49,152
  48,309
49.7
 49.6
 49.0
 49.2
 49.0
Dividends paid per share$0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
  $0.06
$0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
 $0.06
Consolidated Financial Position                  
Current assets$841,818
 $791,617
 $747,241
 $657,860
  $540,347
$1,090.9
 $953.2
 $937.1
 $844.0
 $791.6
Property, plant and equipment, net967,097
 937,325
 739,867
 640,255
  609,205
976.0
 910.1
 877.7
 967.1
 937.3
Goodwill2,197,077
 2,220,921
 1,387,611
 1,370,247
  1,276,567
2,392.1
 2,354.8
 2,164.7
 2,197.1
 2,220.9
Other intangible assets, net411,090
 453,605
 198,769
 214,783
  128,341
1,521.3
 504.7
 441.1
 411.1
 453.6
Other assets43,528
 54,872
 63,773
 58,239
  70,058
Deferred tax assets and other assets132.5
 135.9
 58.0
 43.2
 54.9
$4,460,610
 $4,458,340
 $3,137,261
 $2,941,384
  $2,624,518
$6,112.8
 $4,858.7
 $4,478.6
 $4,462.5
 $4,458.3
Short-term debt$244,193
 $101,518
 $42,987
 $25,284
  $52,979
$37.1
 $23.4
 $226.3
 $243.8
 $101.5
Other current liabilities324,979
 340,664
 278,266
 237,268
  214,227
499.4
 372.7
 316.9
 331.7
 340.7
Long-term debt1,105,764
 1,280,833
 301,670
 348,422
  327,453
1,985.7
 1,149.3
 1,107.4
 1,105.4
 1,280.8
Long-term tax payable141.5
 
 
 
 
Other liabilities111,770
 146,885
 90,844
 117,252
  92,371
141.3
 137.5
 132.1
 111.8
 146.9
Total liabilities1,786,706
 1,869,900
 713,767
 728,226
  687,030
2,805.0
 1,682.9
 1,782.7
 1,792.7
 1,869.9
Stockholders' equity2,673,904
 2,588,440
 2,423,494
 2,213,158
  1,937,488
3,307.8
 3,175.8
 2,695.9
 2,669.8
 2,588.4
$4,460,610
 $4,458,340
 $3,137,261
 $2,941,384
  $2,624,518
$6,112.8
 $4,858.7
 $4,478.6
 $4,462.5
 $4,458.3

In our fiscal fourth quarter of 2014, Cooper acquired Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Limited, as discussed in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 2 of our notes to consolidated financial statements.

39


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Note numbers refer to “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

WeIn this section, we discuss below the results of our operations for fiscal 20152018 compared with fiscal 20142017 and the results of our operations for fiscal 20142017 compared with fiscal 2013.2016. We discuss our cash flows and current financial condition under “Capital Resources and Liquidity.” Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. Within the tables presented, percentages are calculated based on the underlying whole-dollar amounts and, therefore, may not recalculate exactly from the rounded numbers used for disclosure purposes.

Outlook
Overall, we remain optimistic about the long-term prospects for the worldwide contact lens and women’s healthcaregeneral health care markets. However, events affecting the economy as a whole, including but not limited to the uncertainty and instability of global markets driven by foreign currency volatility, Europeanglobal tax reform, debt concerns, and the Affordable Care Act, includinguncertainty caused by the United Kingdom's upcoming withdrawal from the European Union, and the trend of consolidationconsolidations within the healthcarehealth care industry, impact our current performance and continue to represent a risk to our performance for fiscal year 2016.future performance.
CooperVision - We compete in the worldwide contact lens market with our spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses offered in a variety of materials including using silicone hydrogel Aquaform® technology and phosphorylcholine technology (PC) Technology™. We believe that there will be lower contact lens wearer dropout rates as technology improves and enhances the wearing experience through a combination of improved designs and materials and the growth of preferred modalities such as single-use and monthly wearing options. CooperVision is focused on greater worldwide market penetration as we introduce newusing recently introduced products, and we continue to expand our presence in existing and emerging markets, including through acquisitions.

CooperVision acquired the following entities during fiscal 2018:
OnBlueyes on January 4, 2018 - a long-standing distribution partner, which has a leading position in the distribution of contact lenses to the optical and pharmacy sector in Israel
Paragon Vision Sciences on December 1, 2017 - a leading provider of ortho-k specialty contact lenses and oxygen permeable rigid contact lens materials
CooperVision acquired the following entities in fiscal 2017:
Procornea on August 6, 2014, we acquired Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Limited (Sauflon),3, 2017 - a privately-held EuropeanNetherlands based manufacturer andof specialty contact lenses, which expanded CooperVision's access to myopia (nearsightedness) management markets with new products
Grand Vista LLC on June 30, 2017 - a distributor in Russia of soft contact lenses and aftercare solutions. The acquisition of Sauflon expanded our contact lens product portfolio particularly with Sauflon's clariti® 1day brand of single-use silicone hydrogel spherical, toric and multifocal lenses.
Sales of contact lenses utilizing silicone hydrogel materials continue to grow and this product material represents about half of the industry. Our ability to compete successfully with a full range of silicone hydrogel products is an important factor to achieving our desired future levels of sales growth and profitability. CooperVision manufactures and markets monthly and two-weeka wide variety of silicone hydrogel sphericalcontact lenses within the daily, two-week and monthly modalities along with manufacturing some of these lenses as toric lens products under ourand/or multifocal lenses, including but not limited to Biofinity®, claritiMyDay®, Avaira Vitality® and Avairaclariti®. Single-use lenses are designed for daily replacement and frequently replaced lenses are designed for two-week or monthly replacement. We expect increasing demand for clariti® brands1day and a monthly silicone hydrogel multifocal lens under Biofinity. CooperVision markets single-use spherical, toric and multifocal lenses under our clariti 1day brand and a single-use silicone hydrogel spherical lens under MyDay®.
We believe that the global market for single-use contact lenses will continue to grow and our single-use silicone hydrogel products represent an opportunity for our business. Our clariti 1day brand provides the only single-use silicone hydrogel lenses in the marketplace with a complete line of spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses. We forecast increasing aggregate demand for clariti 1day, MyDay, and Proclear 1 Day products, as well as future single-use products. To meet this anticipated demand, we plan to continue the implementation of capital projects to invest in increased single-use manufacturing capacity.
CooperSurgical - Our CooperSurgical business competes in the highly fragmented medical device segment of the women's healthcare market. CooperSurgical has established its market presence and distribution system

40


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




CooperSurgical - Our CooperSurgical business competes in the general health care market with a focus on advancing the health of women, babies and families through a diversified portfolio of products and services focusing on women's health, fertility, diagnostics and contraception. CooperSurgical has established its market presence and distribution system by developing products and acquiring companies, products and productsservices that complement its business model. In August 2015,
CooperSurgical acquired Reprogenetics,the following entities and assets during fiscal 2018:
LifeGlobal Group on April 3, 2018 - a geneticsprivately held company that specializes primarily in IVF media. LifeGlobal’s product categories include media products, IVF laboratory specializingair filtration products and dishware. This acquisition fits CooperSurgical product portfolio and strengthens our fertility media offerings

PARAGARD on November 1, 2017 - CooperSurgical acquired the assets of the PARAGARD IUD business from Teva for $1.1 billion. PARAGARD broadens and strengthens CooperSurgical's current women's health product portfolio and it is the only non-hormonal, long lasting, reversible contraceptive option approved by the FDA and available in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)the United States. IUDs represent a large and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) used duringgrowing segment of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process. We paid $46.8 millioncontraceptive market and this acquisition allows CooperSurgical to accelerate growth providing opportunities for Reprogeneticsoperational synergies.

In fiscal 2017, CooperSurgical acquired Wallace within Fertility, the IVF segment of Smiths Medical International Ltd. Wallace manufactures a range of IVF and expect the acquisition to be neutral to earnings per share excluding acquisition costs and related amortization through fiscal 2016. ob/gyn products.
We intend to continue to investinvesting in CooperSurgical's business through acquisitionswith the goal of companiesexpanding our integrated solutions model within the areas of women's health, fertility, diagnostics and product lines.contraception.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, CooperSurgical product sales are categorized basedrecognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million on the point of healthcare delivery including products used in medical office and surgical proceduresintangible assets acquired from Recombine Inc. (Recombine) as the cash flows expected to be generated by obstetricians and gynecologists (ob/gyns) that represented 66% of CooperSurgical's net salesthis asset group over its estimated remaining life were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. CooperSurgical acquired Recombine in fiscal 2015. CooperSurgical's remaining sales2016, a clinical genetic testing company specializing in carrier screening. In connection with the impairment charge, on June 1, 2018, CooperSurgical announced the exit of the carrier screening and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) product lines in fertility. Exit and restructuring charges which were substantially completed at the end of fiscal 2018, consisted primarily of compensation and benefits to terminated employees, were approximately $10.0 million. The net loss from both product lines are products used in fertility clinics that now represent 34%not material to the Company's consolidated results of CooperSurgical's net sales compared to 35% in fiscal 2014.

operations.
Capital Resources - At October 31, 2015,2018, we had $16.4$77.7 million in cash, primarily outside the United States, and $890.8$560.5 million available under our revolving2016 Revolving Credit Agreement. The $700.0Facility (as defined below). On October 31, 2018, we had $125.0 million outstanding on the $830.0 million 2016 Term Loan Facility (as defined below), and we had the full amount of $1.425 billion outstanding under the 2017 Term Loan Agreement (as defined below).
On November 1, 2018, subsequent to our fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, the Company entered into a 364-day, $400.0 million senior unsecured term loan entered intowhich matures on August 4, 2014, and the $300.0 million term loan entered into on September 12, 2013, remain outstanding as of October 31, 2015. 2019 (the 2018 Term Loan Agreement). The Company used the funds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 14. Subsequent Event of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On March 24, 2015,November 1, 2017, we entered into two new uncommitted revolving lines of credit with a termination date of March 24, 2016, and a maximum combined capacity of $200.0 million. At October 31, 2015, all $200.0 million was outstanding and the proceeds had been utilized to pay down higher interest rate debt$1.425 billion syndicated Term Loan Agreement (2017 Term Loan Agreement) which matures on our revolving Credit Agreement.

On July 14, 2015, CooperVision made a one-time lump sum payment to JJVC of $17.0 million to settle our existing patent disputes. As discussed in Note 12 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the settlement was royalty-free and neither party admitted any liability. On April 7, 2015, we paid all of the outstanding loan notes issued to previous holders of Sauflon shares for the Sauflon acquisition in the amount of $51.2 million that had been recorded in short-term debt. Our current cash balance and availability under existing credit facilities reflects the use of cash outside the United States and the use of existing credit facilitiesNovember 1, 2022, to fund the $1.1 billion acquisition of Sauflon in August 2014. We believe that our cashPARAGARD, to partially repay outstanding amounts under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility, and cash equivalents, cash flow from operating activitiesfor general corporate purposes. On March 1, 2016, we entered into a syndicated revolving Credit and borrowing capacity under existing credit facilities will fund operations both in the next 12 months and in the longer term as well as current and long-term cash requirements for capital expenditures, acquisitions, share repurchases and cash dividends. However, depending on the size or timing of these business activities, we may seek to raise additional debt financing.Term Loan Agreement


41


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




2015 Compared with 2014

Highlights: 2015 vs. 2014

Net sales up 5% to $1.80(the 2016 Credit Agreement). This agreement, maturing on March 1, 2021, provides for a multi-currency revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion from $1.72 billion(the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility) and a term loan facility in fiscal year 2014
Gross margin 60%the aggregate principal amount of net sales$830.0 million (the 2016 Term Loan Facility). We paid down from 64%
Operating income down 23% to $236.7 million from $306.5 million
Interest expense increased to $18.1 million from $8.0 million
Diluted earnings per share down 25% to $4.14 from $5.51
Operating cash flow $391.0 million down 14% from $454.8 million

Fiscal 2015 pre-tax results include $51.5 million for amortization of intangible assets and $126.4$705.0 million of acquisition, integrationthe 2016 Term Loan Facility in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2018 and restructuring costs primarily related tohad $125.0 million outstanding at October 31, 2018. See Note 4. Debt of the acquisition of Sauflon as well as certain legal costs. Acquisition related and integration expenses include items such as personnel costsConsolidated Financial Statements for transitional employees, other acquired employee related costs and integration related professional services. Restructuring expenses consist of employee severance, product rationalization, facility and other exit costs. We expect amortization of intangible assets will recur in future periods; however, the amounts are affected by the timing and size of our acquisitions. Expenses such as the acquisition related and integration expenses generally diminish over time with respect to past acquisitions. However, we generally will incur similar expenses in connection with any future acquisitions.additional information.

The fiscal 2015 results include $57.8 millionCompany believes that current cash, cash equivalents and future cash flow from operating activities will be sufficient to meet the Company’s anticipated cash needs, including working capital needs, capital expenditures and contractual obligations for at least 12 months from the issuance date of expenses primarily duethe financial statements included in this annual report. To the extent additional funds are necessary to product and equipment rationalization related to recentmeet our liquidity needs such as that for acquisitions, $8.0 millionshare repurchases, cash dividends or other activities as we execute our business strategy, we anticipate that additional funds will be obtained through the incurrence of costs associated with the start-upadditional indebtedness, additional equity financings or a combination of new manufacturing facilities, and $4.5 millionthese potential sources of severance costs, all recorded in cost of sales. Included in our selling, general and administrative expense is $31.7 million in costs for CooperVision's acquisition of Sauflon and the related integration and restructuring activities, severance costs in our CooperSurgical fertility business along with other acquisition costs; and $19.8 million of legal costs. The legal costs include a $17.0 million settlement related to intellectual property claims by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (JJVC) as well as litigation costs relating to the class action complaints filed against CooperVision and other contact lens manufacturers, distributors and retailers relating to Unilateral Pricing Policy (UPP). Research and development expense includes $4.6 million of integration and restructuring activities primarily for equipment rationalization along with severance costs.funds; however, such financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all.

The fiscal 2014 integration and restructuring costs include $16.5 million in charges to cost of sales primarily for product rationalization arising from the acquisition of Sauflon. The charge for product rationalization was based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. Included in our selling, general and administrative expense is $44.5 million in costs for CooperVision's acquisition of Sauflon and the related integration and restructuring activities, severance costs in our CooperSurgical fertility business along with other acquisition costs. Research and development expense includes $0.6 million of severance costs related to integration and restructuring activities.

42


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




2018 Compared with 2017
            netsalesgraph18vs18.jpg

Highlights: 2018 vs. 2017

Gross margin remained at 64% of net sales compared with 64% in fiscal 2017
Operating income decreased 6% to $403.1 million from $429.1 million, primarily due to an increase in amortization expenses as a result of acquisitions and a non-recurring impairment charge
Interest expense increased to $82.7 million from $33.4 million due to higher debt balance in connection with acquisitions and higher interest rates
Diluted earnings per share decreased 63% to $2.81 from $7.52 due to U.S. tax reform charges, an increase in amortization expense and a non-recurring impairment charge
Operating cash flow $668.9 million increased 12.7% from $593.6 million

Selected Statistical Information – Percentage of Net Sales
Years Ended October 31,2015 2015 vs. 2014 % Change 2014 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 20132018 2017 2018 vs. 2017 % Change in Absolute Values
Net sales100% 5 % 100% 8% 100%100% 100% 18 %
Cost of sales40% 16 % 36% 12% 35%36% 36% 16 %
Gross profit60% (2)% 64% 6% 65%64% 64% 20 %
Selling, general and administrative expense40% 4 % 40% 12% 38%38% 37% 22 %
Research and development expense4% 5 % 4% 13% 4%3% 3% 23 %
Amortization of intangibles3% 44 % 2% 18% 2%6% 3% 114 %
Loss on divestiture of Aime
 
 
 
 2%
Impairment of intangibles1% 
 
Operating income13% (23)% 18% 0.2% 19%16% 20% (6)%
Net Sales

Our two business units, CooperVisionTHE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and CooperSurgical, generate allAnalysis of our sales.Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CooperVision develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of soft contact lenses for the worldwide vision correction market.
CooperSurgical develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and procedure solutions to improve healthcare delivery to women.


Net Sales Growth by Business Unit

Our consolidated net sales grew by $79.3 million or 5% in fiscal 2015 and $130.0 million or 8% in fiscal 2014:
($ in millions)2015 vs. 2014 % Change 2014 vs. 2013 % Change2018 2017 Increase 2018 vs 2017 % Change
CooperVision$95.1
 7 % $124.3
 10%$1,882.0
 $1,674.1
 $207.9
 12%
CooperSurgical(15.8) (5)% 5.7
 2%650.8
 464.9
 185.9
 40%
$79.3
 5 % $130.0
 8%
Net Sales$2,532.8
 $2,139.0
 $393.8
 18%
CooperVision Net Sales
The contact lens market has two major product categories:
Spherical lenses including lenses that correct near- and farsightedness uncomplicated by more complex visual defects.
Toric and multifocal lenses including lenses that, in addition to correcting near- and farsightedness, address more complex visual defects such as astigmatism and presbyopia by adding optical properties of cylinder and axis, which correct for irregularities in the shape of the cornea.
CooperVision Net Sales by Category
chart-cf7ae50962e15d815f1a02.jpgchart-92a1e1979069263cd7fa02.jpg
($ in millions)2018 2017 2018 vs. 2017 % Change
Toric$591.4
 $526.8
 12%
Multifocal196.6
 177.2
 11%
Single-use spheres520.1
 438.3
 19%
Non single-use sphere, other573.9
 531.8
 8%
 $1,882.0
 $1,674.1
 12%

In order to achieve comfortablethe fiscal year ended October 31, 2018:
Toric and healthy contact lens wear, products are sold with recommended replacement schedules, often defined as modalities, withmultifocal lenses grew primarily through the primary modalities being single-use, two-weeksuccess of Biofinity, clariti and monthly. CooperVision offers spherical, aspherical, toric, multifocal and toric multifocal lens products in most modalities.MyDay
Single-use sphere lenses are designed for daily replacementgrowth was primarily attributed to clariti and frequently replacedMyDay lenses are designed for two-week or monthly replacement. Significantly, the market for spherical lenses is growing with value-added

43


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




spherical lenses to alleviate dry eye symptoms, to add aspherical optical properties and/or higher oxygen permeable lenses such as silicone hydrogels.

CooperVision’s Proclear brand aspheric, toric and multifocal contact lenses, manufactured using PC Technology, help enhance tissue/device compatibility and offer improved lens comfort.Non single-use spheres grew primarily on sales of Biofinity

CooperVision’sIncreased sales of silicone hydrogel Biofinity brand spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses, Avaira brand spherical and toric products and MyDay brand spherical lenses are manufactured using proprietary Aquaform technology to increase oxygen transmissibility for longer wear. Ourwere partially offset by lower sales of older hydrogel products. Total silicone hydrogel clariti brand spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses are availableproducts grew 19% in monthly and single-use modalities. We believe the clariti single-use silicone hydrogel lens products provide a competitive advantage in approved markets as clariti is the only single-use silicone hydrogel lens available in all vision correction categories - spherical, toric and multifocal.

CooperVision fiscal 2015 net sales increased 7% from fiscal 2014 to $1.49 billion. Net sales growth included increases in total sphere lenses up 5%,2018, representing 55%69% of net sales compared to 56%65% in the prior fiscal year
"Other" products primarily include lens care which represent 2% of net sales in fiscal 2018 compared to 3% in prior fiscal year
Foreign exchange rates positively increased sales by $43.9 million in fiscal 2018, primarily attributable to the Euro and British Pound
Sales growth was driven primarily by increases in the volume of lenses sold. Average realized prices by product did not materially influence sales growth
CooperVision Net Sales by Geography
CooperVision competes in the worldwide soft contact lens market and services in three primary regions: the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific.
($ in millions)2018 2017 2018 vs. 2017 % Change
Americas$722.9
 $675.4
 7%
EMEA744.3
 651.2
 14%
Asia Pacific414.8
 347.5
 19%
 $1,882.0
 $1,674.1
 12%

CooperVision's regional growth was primarily attributed to market gains of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and positive foreign exchange rates in EMEA. Refer to CooperVision Net Sales by Category above for further discussion.
CooperSurgical Net Sales by Category
CooperSurgical supplies the family health care market with a diversified portfolio of products and services for use in surgical and other medical procedures that are performed primarily by obstetricians and gynecologists in hospitals, surgical centers, fertility clinics and the medical office. Fertility offerings include highly specialized products and services that target the IVF process, including diagnostics testing with a goal to make fertility treatment safer, more efficient and convenient.
The chart below shows the percentage of net sales of office and surgical products and fertility:

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




chart-605f6ce5b718a2c447aa02.jpgchart-dea0108484cf5b8f91ba02.jpg
The change in product mix was attributable to recent acquisitions, primarily PARAGARD which increased the revenue of office and surgical products.
Year Ended October 31,
($ in millions)
 2018 2017 2018 vs. 2017 % Change
Office and surgical procedures $400.4
 $214.7
 86%
Fertility 250.4
 250.2
 %
  $650.8
 $464.9
 40%

In the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018:
CooperSurgical’s net sales growth was primarily due to incremental revenues from the acquisition of PARAGARD IUD, which is categorized in office and surgical products
Fertility net sales remained relatively flat in fiscal 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to increased sales of IVF equipment and consumables and incremental revenue from LifeGlobal, offset by reduction of revenue from genetic testing primarily from the exit of NIPT and carrier screening product lines in the third quarter of fiscal 2018
Office and surgical products increased compared to prior year periods due to continued growth in surgical products and recently acquired products, primarily PARAGARD
Unit growth and product mix positively impacted sales growth

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




2017 Compared with 2016
            netsalesgraph17vs17.jpg

Highlights: 2017 vs. 2016

Gross margin increased to 64% of net sales compared with 60% in fiscal 2016
Operating income increased 32% to $429.1 million from $324.1 million
Interest expense increased to $33.4 million from $26.2 million
Diluted earnings per share increased 35% to $7.52 from $5.59
Operating cash flow increased 16% to $593.6 million from $509.6 million

Selected Statistical Information – Percentage of Net Sales
Years Ended October 31,2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 % Change in Absolute Values
Net sales100% 100% 9 %
Cost of sales36% 40% (3)%
Gross profit64% 60% 16 %
Selling, general and administrative expense37% 37% 11 %
Research and development expense3% 3% 6 %
Amortization of intangibles3% 3% 13 %
Operating income20% 16% 32 %

Net Sales Growth by Business Unit
($ in millions)2017 2016 Increase 2017 vs 2016 % Change
CooperVision$1,674.1
 $1,577.2
 $96.8
 6%
CooperSurgical464.9
 389.6
 75.4
 19%
Net Sales$2,139.0
 $1,966.8
 $172.2
 9%

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations





CooperVision Net Sales by Category
($ in millions)2017 % Net Sales 2016 %Net sales 2017 vs. 2016 % Change
Toric$526.8
 31% $480.2
 30% 10%
Multifocal177.2
 11% 169.8
 11% 4%
Single-use spheres438.3
 26% 403.1
 26% 9%
Non single-use sphere, other531.8
 32% 524.1
 33% 1%
 $1,674.1
 100% $1,577.2
 100% 6%

In fiscal 2017, CooperVision's toric and multifocal lenses grew largely through the success of our Biofinity, clariti and MyDay portfolios, offset by declines in older hydrogel products. Single-use sphere lenses growth was largely attributed to clariti and MyDay lenses offset by declines in older hydrogel products. Non single-use spheres grew largely on sales of Biofinity offset by declines in older hydrogel products. The term "other" products primarily includes lens care, approximately 3% of net sales in fiscal 2017. Total silicone hydrogel products, including clariti, Biofinity, Avaira and MyDay lenses. Total toric lenses grew 3%,16% in fiscal 2017, representing 30%65% of net sales compared to 31%60% in the prior year on sales of Biofinity, clariti and Avaira lenses. Total multifocal lenses grew 10%, representing 11% of net sales, the same as in the prior year, on sales of Biofinity, clariti and Proclear lenses. Total silicone hydrogel products, including Biofinity, clariti, MyDay and Avaira, grew 19%, representing 55% of net sales up from 49% in the priorfiscal year. CooperVision's older conventional lens products declined 21% and represent 2% of net sales, the same as in the prior year.

CooperVision competes in the worldwide soft contact lens market and services in three primary regions: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific.
CooperVision Net Sales by Geography
($ in millions)2015 2014 2015 vs. 2014 % Change2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 % Change
Americas$624.3
 $585.6
 7 %$675.4
 $650.7
 4%
EMEA602.1
 533.5
 13 %651.2
 612.3
 6%
Asia Pacific261.4
 273.5
 (4)%347.5
 314.2
 11%
$1,487.8
 $1,392.6
 7 %$1,674.1
 $1,577.2
 6%
CooperVision fiscal 20152017 net sales growth was partially offset by foreign exchange rate fluctuations which decreasedhad a negative impact on net sales by $138.4of $19.8 million. Americas net sales growth was primarily due to market gains of silicone hydrogel contact lenses including Biofinity, clariti and MyDay, partially offset by a decrease in sales of older hydrogel lens products. EMEA net sales growth was primarily driven by saleslargely due to market gains of silicone hydrogel contact lenses including Biofinity, clariti and MyDay, silicone hydrogel lenses. The increase in EMEA net sales was partially offset by the negative impact from thea decrease in sales of older hydrogel products and weakening of foreign currencies as compared to the United States dollar. Net sales to the Asia Pacific region decreased due to the negative impact from the weakening of foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese yen,British pound, compared to the prior year against the United States dollar. ExcludingDollar for the impactfirst three fiscal quarters and euro, for the first half of currency,the fiscal year. Net sales in the Asia Pacific region grew on market gains of silicone hydrogel and hydrogel lenses, including Biofinity, clariti and MyDay, along with growth in salespartially offset by weakening foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese yen, for the second half of Proclear 1 Day lenses.the fiscal year.
CooperVision’s net sales growth was driven primarily by increases in the volume of lenses sold, including recently introduced silicone hydrogel products and products from the acquisition of Sauflon.products. While unit growth and product mix have influenced CooperVision’s net sales, growth, average realized prices by product have not materially influenced sales growth.

44


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




CooperSurgical Net Sales
CooperSurgical supplies
Year Ended October 31,
($ in millions)
 2017 % Net
Sales
 2016 % Net
Sales
 2017 vs. 2016 % Change
Fertility $250.2
 54% $175.8
 45% 42%
Office and surgical procedures 214.7
 46% 213.8
 55% %
  $464.9
 100% $389.6
 100% 19%
CooperSurgical's net sales increase in fertility products compared to the market for women's healthcare with a diversified portfolio of products for use in surgical and other medical procedures that are performed primarily by obstetricians and gynecologists in hospitals, surgical centers, fertility clinics and in the medical office. Fertility products include highly specializedprior year period was mainly due to incremental sales from products and services that target in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with a goal to make fertility treatment safer, more efficient and convenient.
Year Ended October 31,
($ in millions)
 2015 % Net
Sales
 2014 % Net
Sales
 2015 vs. 2014 % Change
Office and surgical procedures $204.1
 66% $211.9
 65% (4)%
Fertility 105.2
 34% 113.2
 35% (7)%
  $309.3
 100% $325.1
 100% (5)%
CooperSurgical'sof acquired companies. The net sales of medical office and surgical procedures decreasedremained relatively flat in fiscal 2017 compared to the prior year due to declines in sales of medical equipmentdisposable products, partially offset by growth in recently launched products used in surgical procedures. Unit growth and product mix, primarily sales of disposable products. The netrecently acquired products and services, influenced sales decline in fertility productsgrowth. Net sales growth was primarily due topartially offset by the negative impact from the weakening of foreign currencies as compared to the United States dollar. Excludingdollar during the year.

2018 Compared to 2017 and 2017 Compared to 2016
Gross Margin
Gross Margin2018 2017 2016
CooperVision66% 65% 59%
CooperSurgical61% 60% 62%
Consolidated64% 64% 60%
CooperVision's increase in gross margin in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 was primarily due to:
an increase in sales of higher margin products including Biofinity;
the favorable impact to revenue from exchange rate fluctuations, primarily attributable to the Euro and British Pound; and
was offset by $10.1 million of primarily product transition and integration costs in fiscal 2018.
CooperVision's increase in gross margin in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 was primarily due to:
an increase in sales of higher margin products including Biofinity;
the favorable currency impact to CooperVision's cost of sales primarily led by the weakening of the British pound compared to the United States dollar; and
was offset by $10.9 million of primarily incremental costs associated with the impact of currency, sales grewHurricane Maria on market gainsour Puerto Rico manufacturing facility, $5.7 million of productsproduct write off costs related to the product transition from Avaira sphere to Avaira Vitality, and services recently acquired with Reprogenetics$0.6 million of facility start up in fiscal 2017. Fiscal 2016 gross margin was also negatively impacted by higher restructuring and salesintegrations costs.
CooperSurgical's gross margin in fiscal 2018 was positively impacted by the inclusion of our existing fertility products were flat comparedPARAGARD IUD product with higher gross margin; however, it was offset by:
$49.3 million of inventory step-up relating to the prior year.PARAGARD and LifeGlobal acquisitions; and
CooperSurgical’s sales$16.2 million of primarily include women’s healthcare products used in fertility proceduresintegration and by gynecologists and obstetricians in office and surgical procedures. The balance consists of sales of medical devices outside of women’s healthcare which CooperSurgical does not actively market. CooperSurgical's sales growth was driven primarily by products from recent acquisitions. Unit growth and product mix, primarily sales of fertility products, along with increased average realized prices on disposable products also influenced sales growth.acquisition costs.



45


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




2014 Compared with 2013

Highlights: 2014 vs. 2013

Net sales up 8% to $1.72 billion from $1.59 billionCooperSurgical’s decrease in gross margin in fiscal year 20132017, compared to fiscal 2016 was primarily due to a change in product mix arising from sales of acquired lower margin fertility products and services. Cost of sales included $5.8 million of integration costs compared to $4.4 million in fiscal 2016.
Gross margin 64%Selling, General and Administrative Expense (SGA)
($ in millions)2018 
% Net
Sales
 
2018 vs. 2017
% Change
 2017 
% Net
Sales
 
2017 vs. 2016
% Change
 2016 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$657.2
 35% 13% $583.5
 35% 9% $535.3
 34%
CooperSurgical259.3
 40% 55% 167.8
 36% 19% 141.6
 36%
Corporate56.8
 
 19% 47.8
 
 4% 45.9
 
 $973.3
 38% 22% $799.1
 37% 11% $722.8
 37%
CooperVision's sequential increase in SGA in fiscal 2018, compared to fiscal 2017 and 2016 was due to investments to support our long-term objectives, including increased headcount, investments in information technology and higher distribution expenses to support revenue growth. CooperVision's SGA in fiscal 2018 included $8.7 million of net sales down from 65%integration and third-party consulting costs.
Operating income up 0.2%CooperVision's SGA in fiscal 2017 included $9.1 million of legal costs related to $306.5 million from $305.9 million
Interest expense down 13% to $8.0 million from $9.2 million
Diluted earnings per share down 8% to $5.51 from $5.96
Operating cash flow $454.8 million up 9% from $415.9 million

Fiscal 2014 pre-tax results include $35.7 million for amortization of intangible assetsUnilateral Pricing Policy (UPP) and $62.8$4.7 million of acquisition and integration costs, compared to $2.9 million of UPP costs and $9.0 million of restructuring and integration costs in fiscal 2016.
The increases in CooperSurgical's SGA in the fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales were primarily due to the addition of PARAGARD marketing expenses and sales headcount investment to support growth. CooperSurgical's SGA in fiscal 2018, included approximately $10.0 million of carrier screening and NIPT exit costs and $24.0 million primarily related to the acquisition of Sauflon. We expect amortization of intangible assets will recur in future periods; however, the amounts are affected by the timing and size of our acquisitions. Expenses such as the acquisition related and integration expenses generally diminish over time with respectof acquired companies.
The increase in CooperSurgical's SGA in fiscal 2017 compared to past acquisitions. However, we generally will incur similar expensesfiscal 2016 in connection with any future acquisitions. We incurred significant expenses in connection with our acquisitions and also incurred certain otherabsolute dollars was primarily due to the inclusion of operating expenses or income, which we generally would not have otherwise incurredof acquired companies and investment in the periods presented as a part of our continuing operations. Many of these costs relateheadcount to oursupport growth. CooperSurgical's SGA included $16.3 million primarily related to acquisition of Sauflon in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2014. Acquisition related and integration expenses consist of personnel related costs for transitional employees, other acquired employee related costs and integration related professional services. Restructuring expenses consist of employee severance, product rationalization, facility and other exit costs.

companies compared to $11.3 million in fiscal 2016.
The increases in Corporate SGA in fiscal 2014 integration and restructuring costs include $16.5 million in charges2018 compared to cost of salesfiscal 2017 were primarily for product rationalization arising from the acquisition of Sauflon. The charge for product rationalization is based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. Included in our selling, general and administrative expense (SGA) is $44.5 million in costs for CooperVision's acquisition of Sauflon and the related integration and restructuring activities, severance costs in our CooperSurgical fertility business along with other acquisition costs. Research and development expense includes $0.6due to $6.2 million of severancecompensation costs related to integrationexecutives' retirements. The increase in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 was primarily due to share based compensation related expenses.
Research and restructuring activities.Development Expense (R&D)

Fiscal 2013 pre-tax results include $30.2 million for amortization
($ in millions)2018 
% Net
Sales
 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2017 
% Net
Sales
 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2016 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$54.3
 3% 15% $47.3
 3% 1% $46.9
 3%
CooperSurgical30.5
 5% 40% 21.9
 5% 18% 18.5
 5%
 $84.8
 3% 23% $69.2
 3% 6% $65.4
 3%
In fiscal 2018, CooperVision's R&D increased mainly due to increased costs from acquisitions and increase clinical studies. As a percentage of intangible assets, a $21.1 million losssales, R&D expense remained flat. CooperVision's R&D activities are primarily focused on divestiturethe development of Aime, $14.1 million of insurance proceeds relatedcontact lenses, manufacturing technology and product enhancements. CooperVision's R&D expense remained relatively flat in fiscal 2017 compared to a business interruption claimfiscal 2016.
The sequential increases in CooperSurgical's R&D in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 and $0.6 million of costs, included2016 were primarily due to acquisitions, increased investment and activities in SGA expense, related to the acquisition of Origio.developing new products and services


46


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Selected Statistical Information – Percentageand upgrades of Net Salesexisting products. As a percentage of sales, R&D expense remained flat. CooperSurgical's R&D activities include diagnostics, IVF product development and the design and upgrade of surgical procedure devices.
Amortization of Intangibles
Years Ended October 31,2014 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 2013 vs. 2012 % Change 2012
Net sales100% 8% 100% 10% 100%
Cost of sales36% 12% 35% 8% 36%
Gross profit64% 6% 65% 11% 64%
Selling, general and administrative expense40% 12% 38% 8% 39%
Research and development expense4% 13% 4% 14% 4%
Amortization of intangibles2% 18% 2% 26% 1%
Loss on divestiture of Aime
 
 2% 
 
Operating income18% 0.2% 19% 8% 20%
($ in millions)2018 
% Net
Sales
 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2017 
% Net
Sales
 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2016 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$43.6
 2% 19% $36.7
 2% (9)% $40.1
 3%
CooperSurgical103.1
 16% 224% 31.7
 7% 54 % 20.7
 5%
 $146.7
 6% 114% $68.4
 3% 13 % $60.8
 3%
Net Sales
Our two business units,The increases in amortization expense in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 and 2016 were primarily due to amortization of intangible assets acquired in recent acquisitions in CooperVision and CooperSurgical, generate all of our sales.
CooperVision develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of soft contact lenses for the worldwide vision correction market.
CooperSurgical develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and procedure solutions to improve healthcare delivery to women.
Net Sales Growthprimarily PARAGARD which increased amortization expense by Business Unit$70.8 million.

Our consolidated net sales grewImpairment of Intangible Assets

In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, CooperSurgical recognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million on the intangible assets acquired from Recombine Inc. as the cash flows expected to be generated by $130.0 million or 8%this asset group over its estimated remaining life were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. CooperSurgical acquired Recombine Inc., a clinical genetic testing company specializing in carrier screening, in fiscal 20142016. In connection with the impairment charge, on June 1, 2018, CooperSurgical announced the exit of the carrier screening and $142.6 million or 10%NIPT product lines in fertility. Exit and restructuring charges which were substantially completed at the end of fiscal 2013:2018, consisted primarily of compensation and benefits to terminated employees, were approximately $10.0 million. The net loss from both product lines are not material to the Company's consolidated results of operations.
Operating Income
($ in millions)2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 vs. 2012 % Change2018 
% Net
Sales
 
2018 vs. 2017
% Change
 2017 
% Net
Sales
 
2017 vs. 2016
% Change
 2016 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$124.3
 10% $79.1
 7%$479.8
 25 % 15 % $418.4
 25% 35 % $309.8
 20%
CooperSurgical5.7
 2% 63.5
 25%(19.9) (3)% (134)% 58.5
 13% (3)% 60.2
 15%
Corporate(56.8) 
 (19)% (47.8) 
 (4)% (45.9) 
$130.0
 8% $142.6
 10%$403.1
 16 % (6)% $429.1
 20% 32 % $324.1
 16%
CooperVision Net Sales

CooperVisionThe decrease in consolidated operating income in fiscal 2014 net sales increased 10% from2018 compared to fiscal 2013 to $1.4 billion including Sauflon's net sales, subsequent2017 was primarily due to the acquisition,increase in amortization expense from the PARAGARD intangible assets, impairment of $49.7 million. CooperVision net sales growth included increasesintangible asset and investments in total sphere lenses up 9%, representing 56%SGA in both businesses, partially offset by the increase in consolidated gross margin.
The increase in consolidated operating income in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to the same as the prior year,increase in consolidated gross margins and total toric lenses up 11%, representing 31% of net sales, the same aslower restructuring and integration costs in the prior year. Total multifocal lenses grew 21% to 11% of net sales up from 10% in the prior year on increased sales of Biofinity monthly and Proclear single-use multifocal products. Total silicone hydrogel products, including MyDay, our single-use silicone hydrogel lens, and Sauflon's silicone hydrogel products, including clariti, grew 27%, representing 49% of net sales up from 43% in the prior year. Excluding Sauflon, silicone hydrogel products grew 21%. Proclear product sales grew 6% and represented 24% of net salesCooperVision compared to 25%fiscal 2016. This was partially offset by a decrease in the prior year. CooperVision's older conventional lens products, including cosmetic lenses, declined 12%CooperSurgical operating income due to higher operating expenses relating to acquisitions and now represent 2% of net sales comparedinvestments to 3% in the prior year. The year over year comparison of net sales also reflects no sales in fiscal 2014 of Aime products, divested on October 31, 2013, as compared to $25.8 million of net sales in fiscal 2013.support growth.


47


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




CooperVision competes in the worldwide soft contact lens market and services three primary regions: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific.
CooperVision Net Sales by GeographyInterest Expense
($ in millions)2014 2013 2014 vs. 2013 % Change
Americas$585.6
 $546.2
 7 %
EMEA533.5
 439.4
 22 %
Asia Pacific273.5
 282.7
 (3)%
 $1,392.6
 $1,268.3
 10 %
CooperVision’s worldwide net sales grew 10% in the year-to-year comparison, including Sauflon as discussed above. Americas net sales growth was primarily due to market gains of silicone hydrogel contact lenses along with single-use sphere and multifocal products. EMEA net sales growth was primarily driven by increased sales of silicone hydrogel lenses including Sauflon's silicone hydrogel single-use products. Net sales to the Asia Pacific region decreased due to the negative impact of the weakening of the Japanese yen compared to the United States dollar. Excluding the impact of currency, sales in the Asia Pacific region grew on market gains of silicone hydrogel lenses and single-use products, including Proclear multifocal single-use lenses.
CooperVision’s net sales growth was driven primarily by increases in the volume of lenses sold, including recently introduced silicone hydrogel products and products from the August 2014 acquisition of Sauflon. While unit growth and product mix have influenced CooperVision’s sales growth, average realized prices by product have not materially influenced sales growth.

48


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




CooperSurgical Net Sales
CooperSurgical supplies the market for women's healthcare with its diversified portfolio of products for use in surgical and other medical procedures that are performed by obstetricians and gynecologists in hospitals, surgical centers, fertility clinics and in the medical office. With the July 2012 acquisition of Origio a/s, a global in-vitro fertilization (IVF) medical device company, CooperSurgical develops, manufactures and distributes highly specialized products that target IVF treatment with a goal to make fertility treatment safer, more efficient and convenient.
Year Ended October 31,
($ in millions)
 2014 % Net
Sales
 2013 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013 % Change
Office and surgical procedures $211.9
 65% $213.4
 67% (1)%
Fertility 113.2
 35% 106.0
 33% 7 %
  $325.1
 100% $319.4
 100% 2 %
CooperSurgical's net sales of fertility products increased primarily due to market gains of disposable products partially offset by slower growth in sales of medical equipment. The decline in net sales of medical office and surgical procedures was primarily due to declines in sales of medical equipment offset in part by growth in sales of disposable products.
CooperSurgical’s sales primarily comprise women’s healthcare products used in fertility procedures and by gynecologists and obstetricians in surgical procedures and in the medical office. The balance consists of sales of medical devices outside of women’s healthcare which CooperSurgical does not actively market. Unit growth and product mix, primarily sales of fertility products, along with increased average realized prices on disposable products influenced sales growth.

2015 Compared to 2014 and 2014 Compared to 2013
Cost of Sales/Gross Profit
Gross Profit Percentage of Net Sales2015 2014 2013
CooperVision59% 63% 65%
CooperSurgical64% 64% 64%
Consolidated60% 64% 65%
The decrease in CooperVision's gross margin in the three year period ending October 31, 2015, was primarily attributable to negative effects of foreign currency changes, product and equipment rationalization costs and facility start-up costs. Foreign currency unfavorably impacted gross margin as we reported lower net sales due to the weakening of the foreign currencies as compared to the United States dollar. Gross margin was negatively impacted by product and equipment charges and the related severance costs to rationalize products, arising from our review of Sauflon's products, materials and manufacturing processes. In addition, gross margin was negatively impacted by costs associated with the start-up of new manufacturing facilities. The decrease in gross margin was partially offset by the increase in sales of higher margin products including Biofinity.
CooperSurgical's gross margin remained flat primarily due to an improved mix of higher margin products offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency as we reported lower net sales partially due to the weakening of foreign currencies as compared to the United States dollar.

49


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Selling, General and Administrative Expense (SGA)
($ in millions)2015 
% Net
Sales
 
2015 vs. 2014
% Change
 2014 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$552.1
 37% 7 % $518.2
 37% 16 % $448.2
 35%
CooperSurgical111.2
 36% (2)% 113.4
 35% (4)% 118.5
 37%
Corporate49.2
 
 (4)% 51.5
 
 17 % 44.0
 
 $712.5
 40% 4 % $683.1
 40% 12 % $610.7
 38%
($ in millions)2018 
% Net
Sales
 2018 vs. 2017 % Change 2017 
% Net
Sales
 2017 vs. 2016 % Change 2016 % Net
Sales
Interest expense$82.7
 3% 147% $33.4
 2% 28% $26.2
 1%
The increase in CooperVision's SGAinterest expense in fiscal 20152018 compared to fiscal 2014 in absolute dollars is primarily due to operating expenses of Sauflon. CooperVision's SGA also included approximately $24.5 million primarily for restructuring and integration costs, largely made up of professional fees and personnel related costs for transitional employees related to Sauflon restructuring and integration activities. Fiscal 2015 SGA expenses also include $19.8 million of litigation settlement and legal costs, of which $17.0 million relates to the settlement to intellectual property claims by JJVC, as well as litigation costs relating to the class action complaints filed against CooperVision and other contact lens manufacturers, distributors and retailers relating to UPP. In addition to the restructuring and integration activities related to Sauflon, CooperVision continues to invest in sales and marketing to promote our silicone hydrogel products, including MyDay, to reach new customers and support geographic expansion.
The increase in CooperVision's SGA in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales is primarily due to operating expenses of Sauflon, acquired in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2014, and approximately $42.3 million of acquisition, restructuring and integration costs, largely made up of legal fees, professional fees and severance costs expensed in fiscal 2014.
The decrease in CooperSurgical's SGA in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 in absolute dollars is primarily due to efficiencies as a result of cost control measures partially offset by approximately $4.9 million primarily for integration costs in our fertility business and costs related to the acquisition of Reprogenetics in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2015. The increase in CooperSurgical's SGA in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 as a percentage of net sales reflects the acquisition and acquisition costs along with lower net sales in the current year. CooperSurgical continues to invest in sales activities to promote our products and to reach new customers.
The decrease in CooperSurgical's SGA in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales is primarily due to efficiencies as a result of cost control measures in fiscal 2014 and costs included in fiscal 2013 for acquisition and integration activities related to Origio.
The decrease in Corporate SGA in absolute dollars in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 is due to lower share-based compensation costs, primarily attributable to the timing of grants. The growth in absolute dollars in fiscal 2014 as compared to 2013 was primarily due to increased share-based compensation costs and acquisition-related professional service costs.

50


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Research and Development Expense (R&D)
($ in millions)2015 
% Net
Sales
 2015 vs. 2014 % Change 2014 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$55.2
 4% 5% $52.3
 4% 13% $46.4
 4%
CooperSurgical14.4
 5% 3% 14.0
 4% 12% 12.4
 4%
 $69.6
 4% 5% $66.3
 4% 13% $58.8
 4%
The sequential increases in CooperVision's R&D in absolute dollars over the fiscal years presented are primarily due to investments in new technologies, clinical trials and increased headcount. The increase in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 is primarily due to the inclusion of Sauflon R&D activities and $4.6 million in charges primarily for equipment rationalization and severance costs related to integration activities. CooperVision’s R&D activities are primarily focused on the development of contact lenses and manufacturing improvements.
The sequential increases in CooperSurgical's R&D2017 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales over the fiscal years presented are primarilyreflects higher average debt balances mainly due to increased activitythe $1.425 billion term loan entered into on November 1, 2017 to bring newly acquired products to market, increased investment in projects to develop new productsprimarily fund the PARAGARD acquisition and the upgradehigher interest rates. Fiscal 2018 interest expense also included $2.5 million write off of existing products. CooperSurgical's research and development activities include in vitro fertilization product development and the design and upgrade of surgical procedure devices.
Amortization of Intangibles
($ in millions)2015 
% Net
Sales
 2015 vs. 2014 % Change 2014 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$36.6
 3% 61% $22.7
 2% 36 % $16.7
 1%
CooperSurgical14.9
 5% 14% 13.0
 4% (4)% 13.5
 4%
 $51.5
 3% 44% $35.7
 2% 18 % $30.2
 2%
The sequential increases in amortization are due to acquired intangible assets related to acquisitions, primarily the acquisitions of Reprogenetics in August 2015 and Sauflon in August 2014. We expect amortization in fiscal 2016 to be approximately $12.9 million in each of the fiscal first through third quarters and $12.0 million in the fiscal fourth quarter primarily due to intangible assets acquired with Reprogenetics and Sauflon, offset by intangible assets which we forecast to become fully amortized.
Divested Operation
On October 31, 2013, we completed a transaction to sell Aime, our rigid gas-permeable contact lens and solutions business in Japan, to Nippon Contact Lens Inc. The business was originally obtained as part of the December 1, 2010, acquisition which included obtaining the rights to market Biofinity in Japan. The divestiture was consistent with CooperVision’s strategy to focus on its core soft contact lens business. Additionally, Aime revenue had declined in recent periods, and the products had lower than average company margins.
We recorded a pre-tax loss of approximately $21.1 million in our Consolidated Statement of Income for fiscal 2013. Results from operations of Aime are included in our Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2013, and we have not segregated the results of operations or net assets of Aime on our financial statements for any period presented. The disposition of the assets and liabilities of Aime did not qualify for classification as discontinued operations as CooperVision maintains continuing involvement through a distribution arrangement with Aime for a minimum of three years post divestiture.


51


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Restructuring Costs
During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2014, in connection with the Sauflon acquisition, our CooperVision business unit initiated restructuring and integration activities to optimize operational synergies of the combined companies. The 2014 Sauflon Integration Plan activities include workforce reductions, consolidation of duplicative facilities and product rationalization. We estimate the total restructuring costs under this plan to be $112.0 million. The increase over our prior estimates relates to additional product rationalization and related equipment disposals and accelerated depreciation, primarily related to our hydrogel contact lenses, based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. We expect to be substantially complete with activities related to operating expenses in our fiscal first quarter of 2016, and to incurdebt issuance costs related to manufacturing activities throughpartial prepayments of the end2016 term loan and $1.7 million of fiscal 2016.
PursuantBridge Loan Facility fees that were incurred related to the 2014 Sauflon Integration Plan,PARAGARD acquisition.
The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2015, we recorded expenses in cost of sales of $57.7 million arising from production-related asset disposals and accelerated depreciation on equipment, primarily related to our hydrogel lenses, based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. We also recorded in cost of sales $4.0 million of employee termination costs. We reduced the accrued employee termination costs in selling, general and administrative expense by $7.2 million based on current estimates of the expected costs and the results of voluntary terminations. We recorded in research and development expense $0.7 million of employee termination costs in fiscal 2015. We also recorded in selling, general and administrative expense $0.4 million for lease termination costs. We may, from time to time, decide to pursue additional restructuring activities that involve charges in future periods. See the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Operating Income
($ in millions)2015 
% Net
Sales
 
2015 vs. 2014
% Change
 2014 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013
% Change
 2013 % Net
Sales
CooperVision$229.8
 15% (20)% $289.0
 21%  % $289.3
 23%
CooperSurgical56.1
 18% (19)% 69.0
 21% 14 % 60.6
 19%
Corporate(49.2) 
 4 % (51.5) 
 (17)% (44.0) 
 $236.7
 13% (23)% $306.5
 18% 0.2 % $305.9
 19%
The decrease in consolidated operating income in fiscal 2015 as compared to 2014 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales is primarily due to the decrease in gross profit of 2% and the increase in operating expenses of 6%. The decreases in consolidated and CooperVision operating income in fiscal 2015 as2017 compared to fiscal 20142016 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the intellectual property settlement with JJVC along with restructuring, integration and amortization costs primarily related to Sauflon, as discussed above, recorded in cost of sales and operating expenses. CooperSurgical's operating income in fiscal 2015 decreased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales primarily due to the decrease in net sales of 5%.
The consolidated operating income in fiscal 2014 remained flat as compared to fiscal 2013 in absolute dollars primarily due to the increase in gross profit of 6%, offset by the increase in operating expenses of 9%. The decreases in consolidated and CooperVision operating income as a percentage of sales in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 was due to the acquisition, restructuring and integration costs primarily related to Sauflon, as discussed above, recorded in cost of sales and operating expenses. CooperSurgical's operating income in fiscal 2014 increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales due to the increase of gross profit of 2% and decrease of total operating expense of 3%.

52


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Interest Expense
($ in millions)2015 
% Net
Sales
 2015 vs. 2014 % Change 2014 % Net
Sales
 2014 vs. 2013 % Change 2013 % Net
Sales
Interest expense$18.1
 1% 127% $8.0
 0.5% (13)% $9.2
 0.6%
Interest expense increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 reflectingreflect higher average debt balances as a result of debt incurred in connection with the August 2014 acquisition of Sauflon as well a higher interest rates on our revolving Credit Agreement as such interest rates vary based on leverage. The decrease in interest expense in absolute dollars in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 reflects lower average debt and lower average interest rates during the year. Total debt was $1.35 billion, $1.38 billion and $0.3 billion at October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Current period debt outstanding includes $200.0 million on two uncommitted revolving lines of credit, entered into on March 24, 2015, the $700.0 million term loan, entered into on August 4, 2014, the $300.0 million term loan, entered into on September 12, 2013,acquisitions as well as about $109.2higher interest rates. Fiscal 2017 interest expense also included $2.2 million drawn on our revolving Credit Agreement.
Insurance Proceeds
On October 28, 2011, a manufacturing building in the United Kingdom experienced an incident in which a pipe broke in our fire suppression system, causing water and fire retardant foam damageof Bridge Loan Facility fees that were incurred related to the facility. While this incident did not substantially impact our existing customers, the repairs to the facility and resultant decrease in manufacturing capacity impacted the timing of marketing initiatives to generate additional sales. In January 2013, we resolved our business interruption claim with our insurer for a total of $19.1 million. We received payments of $5.0 million in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2012. In our fiscal first quarter of 2013, we recorded the remaining $14.1 million in our Consolidated Statement of Income of which we received payment of $2.9 million during the fiscal first quarter of 2013 and payment of the remaining $11.2 million in the fiscal second quarter of 2013.PARAGARD acquisition.
Other (Income) Expense, (Income), Net
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)          
2015 2014 2013
Foreign exchange loss (gain)$3.5
 $2.9
 $(0.1)
Other income, net(0.4) (0.9) (1.3)
 $3.1
 $2.0
 $(1.4)
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)          
2018 2017 2016
Foreign exchange loss$3.4
 $1.4
 $1.6
Other (income) expense, net(14.9) 0.3
 0.7
 $(11.5) $1.7
 $2.3
Foreign exchange loss primarily resulted from the revaluation and settlement of foreign currencies-denominated balances. Other income in fiscal 2018 is primarily from the realization of a Puerto Rico research and development credit of $14.2 million as we had the intent and ability to sell the credit.
Other expense in fiscal 2017 includes a $0.2 million foreign exchange loss on forward contracts related to an acquisition. Other expense in fiscal 2016 includes a $0.6 million foreign exchange loss on forward contracts related to an acquisition and a $0.4 million loss related to extinguishment of debt.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded income tax expense of $10.3 million in fiscal 2015 compared to $24.7 million in fiscal 2014. OurThe Company’s effective tax rate (ETR) (provision for income taxes divided by pretax income) was 4.8%57.9%, 5.3% and 7.0% for fiscal 2015, 8.3% for fiscal 20142018, 2017 and 4.9% for fiscal 2013.2016, respectively. The ETR in fiscal 20152018 increased in comparison to fiscal 2017 primarily due to the net charge related to the enactment of the 2017 Act which was partially offset by a shift in the geographic mix of income. The ETR in fiscal 2017 decreased in comparison to fiscal 2014 partially2016 due to discrete items and integration activities. The ETR in fiscal 2014 increased in comparison to fiscal 2013 to reflect the inclusionshift in the fiscal 2013 ETRgeographic mix of several discrete items causing a reduction in that year. These items related primarily to the statutory income as well as excess tax rate reduction in the United Kingdom and the renewal of the R&D tax credit in the United States.benefits from share-based compensation.
The ETR is belowfor 2018 was greater than the United StatesU.S. federal statutory tax rate asprimarily due to the tax expense related to the enactment of the 2017 Act. The ETR for 2017 and 2016 was less than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate because a majority of our taxable income iswas earned in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates. The ratio of domestic taxable income to worldwide taxable income has decreased over recent fiscal years effectively lowering thesignificantly impacted our overall tax rate due to the fact that the tax rates in the majority of foreign jurisdictions where we operate are significantly lower than the statutory rate in the United States.

53


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




The impact on our provision for income taxes of income earned in foreign jurisdictions being taxed at rates different than the United States federal statutory rate was a benefit of approximately $72.6 million and a foreign effective tax rate of approximately 5.6% in our fiscal year 2015 compared to $85.5 million and a foreign effective tax rate of approximately 2.6% in our fiscal year 2014. The foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates as compared to the United StatesU.S. federal statutory tax rate that had the most significant impact on our provision for foreign income taxes in the fiscal years presented include the United Kingdom, Barbados and Puerto Rico. See Note 5. Income Taxes of the notes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Share Repurchases

InTHE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires companies to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, in December 2011, our Board2017, the SEC provided regulatory guidance for accounting referred to as Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 118. Under the guidance in SAB 118, the income tax effects for which the accounting under ASC 740 is incomplete, are reported as a provisional amount based on a reasonable estimate. The reasonable estimate is subject to adjustment during a "measurement period," not to exceed one year, until the accounting is complete. The estimate is also subject to the finalization of Directors authorizedmanagement’s analysis related to certain matters, such as developing interpretations of the provision, changes to certain estimates and amounts related to the earnings and profits of certain subsidiaries and the filing of tax returns. The Company recorded a share repurchase programprovisional charge for fiscal 2018, utilizing the most recent information and subsequently amendedguidance available related to the total repurchase authorizationcalculation of the tax liability and the impact to $500.0 million.its deferred tax assets and liabilities, including those recorded for foreign, local and withholding taxes that the Company assessed as of October 31, 2018. The program has no expiration dateprovisional charge may require further adjustments and changes as new guidance is made available. Revisions to the provisional charge may be discontinued at any time. During fiscal 2015,material to the Company's financial results and will be recorded in the quarter in which we repurchased 468 thousand shares of our common stock for $67.3 million at an average purchase price of $139.60 per share. During fiscal 2014, we repurchased 572 thousand shares of our common stock for $75.8 million at an average purchase price of $132.49 per share. At October 31, 2015, we had remaining authorization to repurchase about $118.4 million of our common stock. Seecomplete the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.analysis.
Share-Based Compensation Plans

We grant various share-based compensation awards, including stock options, performance shares restricted stock and restricted stock units. The share-based compensation and related income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in fiscal 20152018 was $32.9$43.2 million and $10.2$8.8 million, respectively, compared to $36.5$37.2 million and $11.7$11.4 million, respectively, in fiscal 2014.2017. As of October 31, 2015,2018, there was $62.2$79.2 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to non-vested awards: $5.0 millionawards. See Note 8. Stock Plans of the Consolidated Financial Statements for stock options; $48.8 million for restricted stock units; and $8.4 million for performance shares. The unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized over weighted average remaining vesting periods of 2.9 years for nonvested stock options, 3.4 years for restricted stock units and 1.7 years for performance shares. Net (payments) proceeds related to share-based compensation awards for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $(4.8) million, $8.6 million and $19.3 million, respectively.additional information.

We estimate the fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which requires management to make estimates regarding expected option life, stock price volatility and other assumptions. The use of different assumptions could lead to a different estimate of fair value. The expected life of the stock option is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting forfeiture and/or exercise. Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. If our assumption for the expected life increased by one year, the fair value of an individual option granted in fiscal 20152018 would have increased by approximately $4.50.$5.69. To determine the stock price volatility, management considers implied volatility from publicly-traded options on the Company's stock at the date of grant, historical volatility and other factors. If our assumption for stock price volatility increased by one percentage point, the fair value of an individual option granted in fiscal 20152018 would have increased by approximately $1.30.$1.91.

We estimate stock option forfeitures based on historical data for each employee grouping and adjust the rate of expected forfeitures periodically. The adjustment of the forfeiture rate will result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.

We grant performance units that provide for the issuance of common stock to certain executive officers and other key employees if the Company achieves specified long-term performance goals over a three-year period. We estimate the fair value of each award on the date of grant based on the current market price of

54


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




our common stock. The total amount of compensation expense recognized reflects our initial assumptions of the achievement of the performance goals and the estimated forfeiture rates. We review our assessment of the probability of the achievement of the performance goals each fiscal quarter. If the goals are not achieved or it is determined that achievement of the goals is not probable, previously recognized compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the expected achievement. If we determine that achievement of the goals will exceed the original assessment, additional compensation expense is recognized.


55


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
20152018 Highlights
Operating cash flow $391.0$668.9 million downup from $454.8$593.6 million in fiscal 20142017
Expenditures for purchases of property, plant and equipment $243.0$193.6 million up from $238.1$127.2 million in fiscal 20142017
Cash payments for acquisitions $44.9and others, $1,323.9 million primarily for Reprogenetics, compared to $1.1 billion$254.1 million in fiscal 2014, primarily for Sauflon2017
Total debt, net of debt issuance cost at $1.35$2.02 billion at the end of fiscal 20152018 compared to $1.38$1.17 billion at the end of fiscal 20142017
Comparative Statistics
Years Ended October 31,
($ in millions)
2015 20142018 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$16.4
 $25.2
$77.7
 $88.8
Total assets$4,460.6
 $4,458.3
$6,112.8
 $4,858.7
Working capital$272.6
 $349.4
$554.4
 $557.1
Total debt$1,350.0
 $1,382.4
$2,022.8
 $1,172.7
Stockholders’ equity$2,673.9
 $2,588.4
$3,307.8
 $3,175.8
Ratio of debt to equity0.50:1
 0.53:1
0.61:1
 0.37:1
Debt as a percentage of total capitalization34% 35%38% 27%
Working Capital
The decrease in working capital at the end of fiscal 20152018 from the end of fiscal 20142017 was primarily due to thean increase in accrued and other current liabilities ($122.4 million) mainly due to an increase in charge backs, an increase in short term debt from the $200.0 millionnotes payable ($13.7 million), an increase in new revolving lines of credit, borrowed in the fiscal second quarter of 2015,accounts payable ($4.3 million) and utilized to pay down higher interest rate debt on our long term revolving Credit Agreement. Working capital at the end of fiscal 2014 includes $55.1 million of loan notes issued related to the acquisition of Sauflon which was paid in fiscal 2015. The decrease in working capital was also due to thea decrease in cash and cash equivalents ($11.1 million). This was partially offset by the increasesan increase in inventories, accounts receivable ($58.1 million) from increased revenue, an increase in prepayments and other current assets along with($76.0 million) primarily from the decrease$42.0 million (GBP 31 million) payment to U.K. Tax Authorities relating to DPT, and an increase in accounts payable.inventories ($14.7 million).
At October 31, 2018, our inventory months on hand were 6.3 compared to 6.5 at October 31, 2017. The $38.2$14.7 million increase in inventories was primarily relateddue to increased productionincrease in finished goods and raw materials to support product launches of single-use lenses including clariti and MyDay, our single-use silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Our inventory months on hand (MOH) were 7.5 at October 31, 2015, after adjusting for product rationalization costs related to the acquisition of Sauflon and facility start-up costs. This represents an increase from MOH at October 31, 2014 of 6.6 that were adjusted for product rationalization costs related to the acquisition of Sauflon. Our unadjusted inventory MOH was 6.2 and 6.1 at October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.production levels. Our days sales outstanding (DSO) increased to 57 daysremained flat at October 31, 2015, compared to 53 days at October 31, 2014 as trade accounts receivable increased by $6.6 million, primarily due to timing of collections.2018 and at October 31, 2017.

We have reviewed our needs in the United States for possible repatriation of undistributed earnings orand have determined there is sufficient cash ofto fund working capital without repatriating cash from our foreign subsidiaries. We presently intendFor purposes of recording the provisional tax expense for the year ended October 31, 2018, we are no longer asserting that earnings from our foreign subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvested. However, the Company has not completed its analysis and will make a final decision within the measurement period. If the Company changes its assertion to continuenot indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings, there will be more flexibility in using the cash from our foreign operations to indefinitely invest all earnings and cash outside offund future working capital in the United States of all foreign subsidiariesStates.

Accounts Receivable Factoring Program - We may factor certain designated trade receivables with one or more third party financial institutions pursuant to fund foreign investments ora factoring agreement. These are non-recourse factoring arrangements to assist us in managing operating cash flow and meet foreign working capital and property, plant and equipment requirements.
Operating Cash Flow
Cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 continuedthe requirements to be our major source of liquidity, at $391.0 million compared to $454.8 million in fiscal 2014 and $415.9 million in fiscal 2013. Fiscal 2015accounted for

56


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




as sales in accordance with the “Transfers and Servicing” guidance in ASC 860, where the Company’s continuing involvement subsequent to the transfer is limited to providing certain servicing and collection actions on behalf of the purchasers of the designated trade receivables. See Note 1. Accounting Policies of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Operating Cash Flow

Cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal 2018 is one of our major sources of liquidity, at $668.9 million compared to $593.6 million in fiscal 2017 and $509.6 million in fiscal 2016. Cash provided by operating activities increased by $75.3 million in fiscal 2018. This increase in cash flow provided by operating activities primarily consists of an increase of $182.5 million in non-cash items, from $226.9 million in the fiscal 2017 to $409.4 million in fiscal 2018, and increase in assets and liabilities of $125.8 million. This increase was offset by a decrease in net income of $233.0 million from $372.9 million in fiscal 2017 to $139.9 million in fiscal 2018, primarily due to $214.6 million of provisional tax expense related to the 2017 Act.
The $182.5 million increase from non-cash items compared to fiscal 2017 is primarily due to a $86.7 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $50.5 million release of a fair value adjustment to inventory acquired mainly from PARAGARD, impairment of intangibles of $24.4 million and an increase in share-based compensation expense of $6.0 million.

The $125.8 million increase in the net cash from changes in assets and liabilities compared to fiscal 2017 is mainly due to an increase in long-term liabilities of $150.7 million, primarily from a provisional tax liability for the mandatory deemed repatriation of deferred foreign earnings under the 2017 Act of $141.5 million, a $25.9 million increase in the net changes of inventories, driven by acquisitions and higher raw materials to support production levels, and a $62.3 million increase in accrued liabilities mainly due to increase in charge backs. This increase is partially offset by a $34.4 million decrease in net changes in receivables, a $51.1 million decrease in changes to prepayments and other assets primarily due to a $42.0 million payment to the U.K. Tax Authorities, a $22.1 million decrease in net changes to accounts payable and a $5.5 million decrease in accrued income taxes.

Cash flow provided by operating activities in fiscal 2017 was at $593.6 million compared to $509.6 million in fiscal 2016. Fiscal 2017 results include $205.1$372.9 million of net income and non-cash items primarily made up of $191.4$188.4 million related to depreciation and amortization, $32.9$37.2 million of expenseshare-based compensation and $17.3$6.1 million of excess tax benefits both related to share-based compensation, $10.3loss on disposal of property, partially offset by $7.1 million related to net gains in currency translation, $42.4 million related to loss on retirement of property, plant and equipment. Results also includedeferred income taxes. Cash flow from operating capital reflect the changes in operating assets and liabilities, which are primarily reflect the increasesa $25.1 million increase in accounts receivable, driven by higher revenue, an increase in inventories of $30.9 million, driven by higher raw materials to support production levels and inventories from acquisitions, and other assets of $46.8$13.8 million, the increasesoffset by an increase in trade and other receivablesaccounts payable of $7.3$25.0 million, an increase in accrued expenses of $18.9 million, and thean increase in other long term liabilities of $1.2$9.8 million. The $84.0 million relating to taxes. The $63.9 million decreaseincrease in cash flows provided by operating activities in fiscal 2015 as2017 compared to fiscal 20142016 is primarily due to the decreaseincrease in net income the $17.0 million settlement with JJVCand inclusion of excess tax benefit from share based compensation awards in the fiscal third quarter of 2015, and unfavorable changes in working capital.
For fiscal 2015, our primary source of cash flows provided by operating activities was cash collections from our customers for purchasethe adoption of our products. Our primary uses of cash flows from operating activities were for personnel and material costs along with cash payments of $14.0 million for interest, and $17.0 million settlement with JJVC.
For fiscal 2014, our primary source of cash flows provided by operating activities was cash collections from our customers for purchase of our products. Our primary uses of cash flows from operating activities were for personnel and material costs along with cash payments of $4.1 million for interest.ASU2016-09.
Investing Cash Flow

Cash used in investing activities of $287.9increased by $1,136.2 million to $1,517.5 million in fiscal 20152018. The increase was fordriven by a $66.4 million increase in capital expenditures, of $243.0 million primarily to increase manufacturing capacity and payments of $44.9 million related to acquisitions, primarily the acquisition of Reprogenetics in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2015. We forecast increasing aggregate demand for existing and future single-use products. To meet this anticipated demand, in fiscal 2016 we plan to continue the implementation of capital projects to invest in increased single-use manufacturing capacity.the
Cash used in investing activities of $1,346.4 million in fiscal 2014 was for payments of $1,109.7 million related to acquisitions, primarily the acquisition of Sauflon, and capital expenditures of $238.1 million, primarily to increase manufacturing capacity, partially offset by the $1.4 million insurance recovery related to facility repairs.
Financing Cash Flow
The changes in cash flows from financing activities primarily relate to borrowings and payments of debt as well as share repurchases and share-based compensation awards. Cash used in financing activities of $106.7 million in fiscal 2015 was driven by $67.3 million in payments for share repurchases under our existing share repurchase plan, $37.3 million from net repayments of debt, $8.1 million for purchases of noncontrolling interests, net payments of $4.8 million related to vested share-based compensation awards, a $3.2 million payment for contingent consideration, $2.9 million for dividends, and distributions of $1.1 million to noncontrolling interests. Cash used in financing activities was partially offset by $17.3 million in excess tax benefits from share-based compensation awards and $0.7 million of proceeds from a construction allowance. Net repayment of debt in the period includes the payment of $51.2 million to settle all the outstanding loan notes issued for the Sauflon acquisition.
In fiscal 2014, the changes in cash flows from financing activities primarily related to borrowings and payments of debt as well as share repurchases and share-based compensation awards. Cash provided by financing activities of $842.2 million in fiscal 2014 was driven by $887.9 million from net borrowings of debt, $19.3 million in excess tax benefits from share-based compensation awards, $12.2 million of proceeds from a construction allowance and $8.6 million of proceeds from exercise of share-based compensation awards. Cash provided by financing activities was partially offset by $75.8 million in payments for share repurchases under our share repurchase plan, a $3.8 million payment for contingent consideration, $2.9

57


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




expansion of distribution and manufacturing capacity, and an increase in payments for business and asset acquisitions of $1,069.8 million. The increase in payments related to acquisitions was largely due to the acquisition of PARAGARD as discussed in Outlook above and in Note 2. Acquisitions of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash used in investing activities of $381.3 million in fiscal 2017 was for capital expenditures of $127.2 million primarily to increase manufacturing capacity and payments of $254.1 million primarily related to acquisitions in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2017, payments related to the acquisitions are Procornea Holding B.V, Wallace and Grand Vista LLC.
Financing Cash Flow
Cash provided by financing activities increased by $1,072.3 million to $844.4 million in fiscal 2018. The increase was driven by a $1,012.1 million increase of net proceeds from short and long-term debt primarily due to additional debt taken on to fund the PARAGARD acquisition, and $7.1 million increase in net proceeds related to share-based compensation awards. No share repurchases were made in fiscal 2018 compared to $55.0 million in fiscal 2017.
Cash used in financing activities of $227.9 million in fiscal 2017 was driven by $211.7 million net repayments of short term debt, $55.0 million for repurchase of common stock, $5.3 million net payments related to share-based compensation awards, $4.3 million of payments of contingent consideration for prior acquisitions and $2.9 million for dividends, $2.4partially offset by $49.2 million net proceeds from long term debt.
The 2017 Term Loan Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, as well as financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain Total Leverage Ratio and Interest Coverage Ratio (each as defined in the 2017 Term Loan Agreement) consistent with the 2016 Credit Agreement. As defined, in both the 2017 Term Loan Agreement and the 2016 Credit Agreement, we are required to maintain an Interest Coverage Ratio of distributionsat least 3.00 to noncontrolling interests,1.00, and $0.9 milliona Total Leverage Ratio of debt acquisition costs associated with obtaining the term loan.
no higher than 3.75 to 1.00. At October 31, 2015,2018, we had $16.4 million in cash, primarily outside the United States, and $890.8 million available under our existing revolving Credit Agreement. The $200.0 million borrowed on the new revolving lines of credit, the $700.0 million term loan entered into on August 4, 2014, and the $300.0 million term loan entered into on September 12, 2013, were outstanding as of October 31, 2015. We are in compliance with our financial covenants including the Interest Coverage Ratio at 31.3410.66 to 1.00 and the Total Leverage Ratio at 2.38 to 1.00. As defined, in both the Credit Agreement and term loans, the Interest Coverage Ratio is the ratio of Consolidated Proforma EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense with the requirement to be at least 3.00 to 1.00 and the Total Leverage Ratio is the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated Proforma EBITDA with the requirement to be no higher than 3.752.21 to 1.00.

At October 31, 2018, we had $1.425 billion outstanding under the 2017 Term Loan Agreement, $125.0 million outstanding under the 2016 Term Loan Facility and $560.5 million available under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility.

At October 31, 2018, we had $77.7 million in cash & cash equivalents, predominantly outside the United States.

On November 1, 2018, subsequent to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, the Company entered into a 364-day, $400.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent which matures on October 31, 2019 (the 2018 Term Loan Agreement). The Company used the funds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 14. Subsequent Event of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Share Repurchases
In December 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the 2012 Share Repurchase Program and through subsequent amendments, the most recent in March 2017, the total repurchase authorization was increased from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion of the Company's common stock. The program has no expiration date

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




and may be discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares during fiscal 2018. At October 31, 2018, we had remaining authorization to repurchase $563.5 million of our common stock
During fiscal 2017, we repurchased 108 thousand shares of our common stock for $25.5 million at an average purchase price of $237.12 per share in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017; and repurchased 150 thousand shares of our common stock for $29.5 million at an average purchase price of $196.82 per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We did not repurchase any shares during fiscal 2016.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
 
None.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
 
As of October 31, 2015,2018, we had the following contractual obligations and commercial commitments:
Payments Due by Period
(In millions)
Total 2016 
2017
& 2018
 
2019
& 2020
 
2021
& Beyond
Total 2019 
2020
& 2021
 
2022
& 2023
 
2024
& Beyond
Contractual obligations:                  
Long-term debt$1,109.6
 $3.8
 $1,105.5
 $
 $0.3
$1,989.2
 $
 $564.2
 $1,425.0
 $
Interest payments29.5
 15.0
 14.5
 
 
228.0
 62.0
 116.0
 50.0
 
Operating leases238.8
 27.8
 45.6
 36.3
 129.1
304.2
 37.5
 60.6
 46.4
 159.7
Contingent consideration1.0
 0.5
 0.5
   
Transition tax on unremitted foreign earnings and profits (1)
153.8
 12.3
 24.6
 24.6
 92.3
Total contractual obligations1,378.9
 47.1
 1,166.1
 36.3
 129.4
2,675.2
 111.8
 765.4
 1,546.0
 252.0
Commercial commitments:                  
Stand-by letters of credit2.5
 2.5
 
 
 
4.7
 4.7
 
 
 
Total$1,381.4
 $49.6
 $1,166.1
 $36.3
 $129.4
$2,679.9
 $116.5
 $765.4
 $1,546.0
 $252.0

(1) As of October 31, 2018, we had recorded $153.8 million of income tax liabilities related to the provisional one-time transition tax that resulted from the enactment of the 2017 Act, which will be payable in eight annual installments. The first installment is classified as a current income tax payable on our consolidated balance sheet. The remaining installment amounts will be equal to 8% of the total liability, payable in fiscal 2020 through 2023, 15% in fiscal year 2024, 20% in fiscal year 2025, and 25% in fiscal year 2026.

The expected future benefit payments for pension plans through 20252028 are disclosed in Note 10.9. Employee Benefits.Benefits of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
We are unable to reliably estimate the timing of future payments related to uncertain tax positions; therefore, about $28.4$68.9 million of our long-term income taxes payable have been excluded from the table above. However, other long-term liabilities, included in our consolidated balance sheet, include these uncertain tax positions. See Note 65. Income Taxes of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
 
Inflation and Changing Prices
 
Inflation has had no appreciable effect on our operations in the last three fiscal years.
 
Accounting Pronouncements Issued and Not Yet Adopted

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this

58


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. We do not anticipate the adoption of these amendments, which are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning on November 1, 2016, will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 sets forth a new revenue recognition model that requires identifying the contract, identifying the performance obligations, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and recognizing the revenue upon satisfaction of performance obligations. The amendments in the ASU can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the update recognized at the date of the initial application along with additional disclosures. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09, which is effective for the Company in our fiscal year beginning on November 1, 2018.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
Information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in Note 1. Accounting Policies of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On November 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit when a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. When a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available, or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.




59


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
 
Management estimates and judgments are an integral part of financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We believe that the critical accounting policies described in this section address the more significant estimates required of management when preparing our consolidated financial statementsthe Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP. We consider an accounting estimate critical if changes in the estimate may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in future periods.
Revenue recognition - We recognize product net sales, net of discounts, returns and rebates in accordance with related accounting standards and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins. As required by these standards, we recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned, based on terms of sale with the customer, where persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred, the seller's price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. For contact lenses as well as CooperSurgical medical devices,CooperSurgical's office and surgical products, fertility and diagnostic products and surgical instruments and accessories,services, this primarily occurs when title and risk of ownership transfers to our customers.customers, and/or when services are rendered. We believe our revenue recognition policies are appropriate in all circumstances, and that our policies are reflective of our customer arrangements. We record, based on historical statistics, estimated reductions to revenue for customer incentive programs offered including cash discounts, promotional and advertising allowances, volume discounts, contractual pricing allowances, chargebacks, rebates and specifically established customer product return programs. We record taxes collected from customers on a net basis, as these taxes are not included in net sales.
Net realizable value of inventory - In assessing the value of inventories, we make estimates and judgments regarding aging of inventories and other relevant issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products and estimated prices at which those products will sell. On an ongoing basis, we review the carrying value of our inventory, measuring number of months on hand and other indications of saleability. We reduce the value of inventory if there are indications that the carrying value is greater than market, resulting in a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory. Subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. While estimates are involved, historically, obsolescence has not been a significant factor due to long product dating and lengthy product life cycles. We target to keep, on average, five to seven months of inventory on hand to maintain high customer service levels given the complexity of our contact lens and women's healthcare product portfolios.
Valuation of goodwill - We account for goodwill and evaluate our goodwill balances and test them for impairment annually during the fiscal third quarter and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that impairment may exist in accordance with related accounting standards. We performed our annual impairment test in our fiscal third quarter of 2015,2018, and our analysis indicated that we had no impairment of goodwill. We performed our annual impairment test in our fiscal third quarter of 20142017 and concluded that we had no impairment of goodwill in that year.
In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we performed qualitative assessments to test each reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Qualitative factors considered in this assessment include industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and other relevant events and factors affecting each reporting unit. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not to be less than its carrying amount, the two-step impairment test will be performed.

60


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Initially, we compare the book value of net assets to the fair value of each reporting unit that has goodwill assigned to it. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. A reporting unit is the level of reporting at which goodwill is tested for impairment. Our reporting units are the same as our business segments - CooperVision and CooperSurgical - reflecting the way that we manage our business.

Goodwill impairment analysis and measurement is a process that requires significant judgment. If our common stock price trades below book value per share, there are changes in market conditions or a future downturn in our business, or a future annual goodwill impairment test indicates an impairment of our goodwill, we may have to recognize a non-cash impairment of our goodwill that could be material, and could adversely affect our results of operations in the period recognized and also adversely affect our total assets, stockholders' equity and financial condition.
We test goodwill impairment in accordance with ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. We perform a qualitative assessment to test each reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Qualitative factors considered in this assessment include industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and other relevant events and factors affecting each reporting unit. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not to be less than its

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




carrying amount, the fair value of a reporting unit will be compared with its carrying amount and an impairment charge will be recognized for the carrying amount which exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. A reporting unit is the level of reporting at which goodwill is tested for impairment. Our reporting units are the same as our business segments - CooperVision and CooperSurgical - reflecting the way that we manage our business.
Business combinations - We routinely consummate business combinations. Results of operations for acquired companies are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. We recognize separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired, including acquired in-process research and development, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date fair values as defined by accounting standards related to fair value measurements. Key assumptions routinely utilized in allocation of purchase price to intangible assets include projected financial information such as revenue projections for companies acquired. As of the acquisition date, goodwill is measured as the excess of consideration given, generally measured at fair value, and the net of the acquisition date fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Direct acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Income taxes - We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements,the Consolidated Financial Statements, we must estimate our income tax expense for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires significant management judgments and involves estimating our current tax exposures in each jurisdiction including the impact, if any, of additional taxes resulting from tax examinations as well as judging the recoverability of deferred tax assets. To the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on our estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction, a valuation allowance is established. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve. Frequent changes in tax laws in each jurisdiction complicate future estimates. To determine the tax rate, we are required to estimate full-year income and the related income tax expense in each jurisdiction. We update the estimated effective tax rate for the effect of significant unusual items as they are identified. Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual pre-tax income can affect the overall effective tax rate, and such changes could be material.

Regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, we recognize the benefit from a tax position only if it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. We measure theclassify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as additional income tax benefits from the tax positions that are recognized, assess the timing of the derecognition of previously recognized tax benefits and classify and disclose the liabilities within the consolidated financial statements for any unrecognizedexpense.

61


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




tax benefits based on the guidance in the interpretation of related accounting guidance for income taxes. The interpretation also provides guidance on how the interest and penalties related to tax positions may be recorded and classified within our Consolidated Statement of Income and presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as additional income tax expense.
Share-Based Compensation - We grant various share-based compensation awards, including stock options, performance unit shares, restricted stock and restricted stock units. Under fair value recognition provisions, share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating Cooper's stock price volatility, employee exercise behaviors and related employee forfeiture rates.

The expected life of the share-based awards is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting forfeiture and/or exercise. Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. In determining the expected volatility, management considers implied volatility from publicly-traded options on Cooper's common stock at the date of grant, historical volatility and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the continuous rates provided by the United States Treasury with a term equal to the expected life of the award. The dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share, divided by the stock price at the date of grant.

As share-based compensation expense recognized in our Consolidated Statement of Income is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant, based on historical experience, and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of the fair value recognition provisions, the compensation expense that we record in future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.


62


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations




Trademarks

Aquaform®, Avaira®, Avaira Vitality®,Biofinity®, MyDay® and Proclear® are registered trademarks of The Cooper Companies, Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. PC Technology™, FIPS™, and A Quality of Life Company™ are trademarks of The Cooper Companies, Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The clariti® mark is a registered trademark of The Cooper Companies, Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries worldwide except in the United States where the use of clariti® is licensed. PARAGARD® is a registered trademark of CooperSurgical, Inc.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.
 
We are exposed to market risks that relate principally to changes in interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations. To the extent reasonable and practical, we may decide to reduce the risk of changing interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations on the underlying exposure by entering into interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward exchange contracts, respectively. We do not emphasize such transactions to the same degree as some other companies with international operations. We do not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes.

We operate multiple foreign subsidiaries that manufacture and market our products worldwide. As a result, our earnings, cash flow and financial position are exposed to foreign currency risk from foreign currency denominated receivables and payables, sales transactions, capital expenditures and net investment in certain foreign operations. We are exposed to risks caused by changes in foreign exchange, primarily to the British pound sterling, euro, Japanese yen, Danish krone, Swedish krona, Australian dollar and Canadian dollar. Our policy is to minimize, to the extent reasonable and practical, transaction, remeasurement and specified economic exposures with derivatives instruments. Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions to reduce our nonfunctional currency exposure, these hedging transactions do not eliminate that risk entirely. AAt October 31, 2018, a uniform hypothetical 5% increase or decrease in the foreign currency exchange rates in comparison to the United States dollar would not have resulted in a material adverse impact on our financial conditioncorresponding increase or results of operations.decrease in approximately $30.0 million in operating income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018. For additional information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors - "Our substantial and expanding international operations are subject to uncertainties which could affect our operating results.” and See Note 1 to1. Accounting Policies of the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
We are also exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, as the interest rate on our senior unsecured syndicated credit facilities, including the revolving Credit Agreement and term loans, may vary with the federal funds rate and London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). We may decrease this interest rate risk by hedging a portion of variable rate debt effectively converting it to fixed rate debt.
On March 24, 2015, we entered into two uncommitted line of credit agreements that have termination dates of March 24, 2016, and provide revolving loan amounts of upSubsequent to $100.0 million each with maturity dates of up to ninety days from the loan origination date. Atfiscal year ended October 31, 2015, $200.0 million was outstanding under these facilities.
On August 4, 2014, we2018, on November 1, 2018, the Company entered into a three-year, $700.0364-day, $400.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement that will matureby and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent which matures on August 4, 2017. There is no amortizationOctober 31, 2019 (the 2018 Term Loan Agreement). The Company used the funds it has drawn under the facility to partially repay outstanding borrowings under the Company’s 2016 Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 14. Subsequent Event of the principal, and we may prepay the loan balances from time to time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. At October 31, 2015, $700.0 million remained outstanding on this term loan.

Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On September 12, 2013,November 1, 2017, in connection with the PARAGARD acquisition, we entered into a five-year, $300.0 million,$1.425 billion, senior unsecured term loan agreement that will mature(2017 Term Loan Agreement) by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and DNB Bank ASA, New York Branch, as administrative agent which matures on September 12, 2018, and will be subjectNovember 1, 2022. The Company used part of the facility to amortization of principal of 5% per year payable quarterly beginning October 31, 2016, withfund the balance payable at maturity. At October 31, 2015, $300.0 million remained outstanding on this term loan.PARAGARD

63


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



acquisition and used the remainder of the funds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. At October 31, 2018, we had $1.425 billion outstanding under the 2017 Term Loan Agreement.
On May 31, 2012,March 1, 2016, we entered into an amendment to oura Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (2016 Credit Agreement) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. The 2016 Credit Agreement originally entered into on January 12, 2011. Theprovides for a multicurrency revolving credit facility in an aggregate revolving commitment isprincipal amount of $1.0 billion with(2016 Revolving Credit Facility) and a maturity dateterm loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of May 31, 2017,$830.0 million (2016 Term Loan Facility), each of which, unless terminated earlier, mature on March 1, 2021. The 2016 Credit Agreement replaced our previous credit agreement and we havefunds from the ability2016 Term Loan Facility were used to increase the facility by up to an additional $500.0 million.repay other outstanding loans and for general corporate purposes. At October 31, 2015,2018, we had $890.8$125.0 million outstanding under the 2016 Term Loan Facility and $560.5 million available under the revolving2016 Revolving Credit Agreement.Facility.
See Note 4. Debt of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
October 31,
(In millions)
2015 20142018 2017
Short-term debt$240.4
 $101.5
$37.1
 $23.4
Current portion of long-term debt3.8
 
Long-term debt1,105.8
 1,280.8
1,989.2
 1,153.2
Less: unamortized debt issuance cost(3.5) (3.9)
Total$1,350.0
 $1,382.3
$2,022.8
 $1,172.7
At October 31, 2015,2018, the scheduled maturities of our fixed and variable rate long-term debt obligations, their weighted average interest rates and their estimated fair values were as follows:rates:
Expected Maturity Date Fiscal Year
($ in millions)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total 
Fair
Value
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total 
Fair
Value
Long-term debt:                             
Fixed interest rate$
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $
 $
 $0.3
 $0.5
 $0.5
Average interest rate2.9% 3.4% 4.3% 
 
 6.0%    
Variable interest rate$3.8
 $824.0
 $281.3
 $
 $
 $
 $1,109.1
 $1,109.1$
 $
 $564.2
 $
 $1,425.0
 $
 $1,989.2
 $1,989.2
Average interest rate1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 
 
 
    
 
 3.5% 
 3.5% 
   

As the table incorporates only those exposures that existed as of October 31, 2015,2018, it does not consider those exposures or positions which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on interest rates, the exposures that arise during the period and our hedging strategies at that time. As of October 31, 2015,2018, we had no outstanding interest rate swap outstanding.swaps. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 1% or 100 basis points, annual interest expense would increase or decrease by about $11.1 million.approximately $23.9 million based on average debt outstanding for fiscal 2018. For further information about our debt, see Item 1A. Risk Factors - “We are vulnerable to interest rate risk with respect to our debt.” and Note 11. Accounting Policies and Note 5 to4. Debt of the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


64


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Cooper Companies, Inc.:
Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Cooper Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 20152018 and 2014, and2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of2018, and the related notes and financial statement Schedule II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited financial statement schedule II.statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Commission.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements financial statement schedule and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

65


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Cooper Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).



 
/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1982.

San Francisco, California
December 18, 201521, 2018


66




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended October 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2015 2014 2013
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions, except for earnings per share)
2018 2017 2016
Net sales$1,797,060
 $1,717,776
 $1,587,725
$2,532.8
 $2,139.0
 $1,966.8
Cost of sales726,798
 626,206
 560,917
900.5
 773.2
 793.7
Gross profit1,070,262
 1,091,570
 1,026,808
1,632.3
 1,365.8
 1,173.1
Selling, general and administrative expense712,543
 683,115
 610,735
973.3
 799.1
 722.8
Research and development expense69,589
 66,259
 58,827
84.8
 69.2
 65.4
Amortization of intangibles51,459
 35,710
 30,239
146.7
 68.4
 60.8
Loss on divestiture of Aime
 
 21,062
Impairment of intangibles24.4
 
 
Operating income236,671
 306,486
 305,945
403.1
 429.1
 324.1
Interest expense18,103
 7,965
 9,168
82.7
 33.4
 26.2
Gain on insurance proceeds
 
 14,084
Other expense (income), net3,083
 1,987
 (1,410)
Other (income) expense, net(11.5) 1.7
 2.3
Income before income taxes215,485
 296,534
 312,271
331.9
 394.0
 295.6
Provision for income taxes10,341
 24,705
 15,365
192.0
 21.1
 20.7
Net income205,144
 271,829
 296,906
139.9
 372.9
 274.9
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,621
 1,973
 755
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1.0
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders$203,523
 $269,856
 $296,151
$139.9
 $372.9
 $273.9
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - basic$4.20
 $5.61
 $6.09
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - diluted$4.14
 $5.51
 $5.96
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders:
 
 
Earnings per share - basic$2.85
 $7.63
 $5.65
Earnings per share - diluted$2.81
 $7.52
 $5.59
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share:

 

 

Basic48,452
 48,061
 48,615
49.1
 48.9
 48.5
Diluted49,179
 48,960
 49,685
49.7
 49.6
 49.0
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

67




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended October 31,
(In thousands)
2015 2014 2013
Net income$205,144
 $271,829
 $296,906
Other comprehensive (loss) income:     
Foreign currency translation adjustment(79,424) (87,763) 2,607
Change in value of derivative instruments, net of tax provision of $30, $630 and $857, respectively47
 986
 1,341
Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax (benefit) provision of $(3,908), $(2,348) and $7,399, respectively(6,084) (3,643) 11,601
Reclassification of realized gain on marketable securities to net income, net of tax provision of $27 in fiscal 2013
 
 (50)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(85,461) (90,420) 15,499
Comprehensive income119,683
 181,409
 312,405
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(533) (733) 717
Comprehensive income attributable to Cooper stockholders$119,150
 $180,676
 $313,122
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2018 2017 2016
Net income$139.9
 $372.9
 $274.9
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment(58.5) 107.7
 (289.6)
Change in minimum pension liability, net of tax provision (benefit) of $3.1, $4.2 and $(5.3), respectively7.9
 6.6
 (8.4)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(50.6) 114.3
 (298.0)
Comprehensive income (loss)89.3
 487.2
 (23.1)
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 0.9
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cooper stockholders$89.3
 $487.2
 $(24.0)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


68




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
October 31,
(In thousands)
2015 2014
October 31,
(In millions)
2018 2017
ASSETS
 

 
Current assets:
 

 
Cash and cash equivalents$16,426
 $25,222
$77.7
 $88.8
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,956 at October 31, 2015 and $6,025 at October 31, 2014
282,918
 276,280
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $19.0 at October 31, 2018 and $10.8 at October 31, 2017374.7
 316.6
Inventories419,692
 381,474
468.8
 454.1
Deferred tax assets41,731
 40,224
Prepaid expense and other current assets81,051
 68,417
169.7
 93.7
Total current assets841,818
 791,617
1,090.9
 953.2
Property, plant and equipment, at cost1,650,730
 1,525,917
1,930.3
 1,757.5
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization683,633
 588,592
954.3
 847.4

967,097
 937,325
976.0
 910.1
Goodwill2,197,077
 2,220,921
2,392.1
 2,354.8
Other intangibles, net411,090
 453,605
1,521.3
 504.7
Deferred tax assets4,510
 15,732
58.4
 60.3
Other assets39,018
 39,140
74.1
 75.6

$4,460,610
 $4,458,340
$6,112.8
 $4,858.7
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 

 
Current liabilities:
 

 
Short-term debt$244,193
 $101,518
$37.1
 $23.4
Accounts payable116,912
 116,353
146.4
 142.1
Employee compensation and benefits67,373
 67,904
94.0
 84.1
Accrued income taxes14,740
 4,034
Other current liabilities125,954
 152,373
259.0
 146.5
Total current liabilities569,172
 442,182
536.5
 396.1
Long-term debt1,105,764
 1,280,833
1,985.7
 1,149.3
Deferred tax liabilities31,016
 69,525
31.0
 38.8
Long-term tax payable141.5
 
Accrued pension liability and other80,754
 77,360
110.3
 98.7
Total liabilities1,786,706
 1,869,900
2,805.0
 1,682.9
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 12)
 
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 11)
 
Stockholders’ equity:
 


 

Preferred stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 1,000; zero shares issued or outstanding
 
Common stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 120,000; issued 51,558 at October 31, 2015 and 50,983 at October 31, 20145,156
 5,099
Preferred stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 1.0; zero shares issued or outstanding
 
Common stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 120.0; issued 52.8 at October 31, 2018 and 52.4 at October 31, 20175.3
 5.2
Additional paid-in capital1,434,705
 1,386,800
1,572.1
 1,526.7
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(191,643) (106,182)(430.7) (375.3)
Retained earnings1,779,440
 1,578,823
2,576.0
 2,434.2
Treasury stock at cost: 3,290 shares at October 31, 2015 and 2,840 shares at October 31, 2014
(360,149) (294,662)
Treasury stock at cost: 3.6 shares at October 31, 2018 and 3.6 shares at October 31, 2017(415.1) (415.1)
Total Cooper stockholders' equity2,667,509
 2,569,878
3,307.6
 3,175.7
Noncontrolling interests6,395
 18,562
0.2
 0.1
Stockholders’ equity2,673,904
 2,588,440
3,307.8
 3,175.8

$4,460,610
 $4,458,340
$6,112.8
 $4,858.7


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
69



THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
Common Shares Treasury Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Noncontrolling Interests Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Common Shares Treasury Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Noncontrolling Interests Total
Stockholders'
Equity
(In thousands)Shares Amount Shares Amount    
Balance at October 31, 201248,440
 $4,844
 1,007
 $101
 $1,265,202
 $(31,261) $1,018,618
 $(64,753) $20,407
 $2,213,158
(In millions)Shares Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Noncontrolling Interests Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at October 31, 201548.3
 $4.8
 3.3
 $0.3
 
  
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders
 
 
 
 
 
 296,151
 
 
 296,151

 
 

 
 
 273.9
 
 
 273.9
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 15,499
 
 
 
 15,499
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (298.0) 
 
 
 (298.0)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans976
 98
 (88) (9) 13,028
 
 
 6,170
 
 19,287
0.5
 0.1
 
 
 7.1
 
 
 
 
 7.2
Treasury stock repurchase(1,421) (142) 1,421
 142
 
 
 
 (167,334) 
 (167,334)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
 
 
 
 21,799
 
 
 
 
 21,799

 
 
 
 20.9
 
 
 
 
 20.9
Dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,918) 
 
 (2,918)
 
 
 
 
 
 (2.9) 
 
 (2.9)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
 
 28,538
 
 
 
 
 28,538

 
 
 
 29.9
 
 
 
 
 29.9
Purchase of shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 762
 
 
 
 (1,062) (300)
 
 
 
 1.4
 
 
 
 (3.6) (2.2)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,141) (1,141)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (0.7) (0.7)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 755
 755

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2.0) (2.0)
Balance at October 31, 201347,995
 $4,800
 2,340
 $234
 $1,329,329
 $(15,762) $1,311,851
 $(225,917) $18,959
 $2,423,494
Balance at October 31, 201648.8
 $4.9
 3.3
 $0.3
 $1,494.0
 $(489.6) $2,046.3
 $(360.1) $0.1
 $2,695.9
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders
 
 
 
 
 
 372.9
 
 
 372.9
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 114.3
 
 
 
 114.3
Issuance of common stock for stock plans0.3
 
 
 
 (5.3) 
 
 
 
 (5.3)
Treasury stock repurchase(0.3) 
 0.3
 
 
 
 
 (55.0) 
 (55.0)
Dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 
 (2.9) 
 
 (2.9)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
 
 38.2
 
 
 
 
 38.2
ASU 2016-09 adoption
 
 
 
 (0.2) 
 17.9
 
 
 17.7
Balance at October 31, 201748.8
 $4.9
 3.6
 $0.3
 $1,526.7
 $(375.3) $2,434.2
 $(415.1) $0.1
 $3,175.8
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders
 
 
 
 
 
 269,856
 
 
 269,856

 
 
 
 
 
 139.9
 
 
 139.9
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (90,420) 
 
 
 (90,420)
 
 
 
 
 (50.6) 
 
 
 (50.6)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans720
 72
 (72) (7) 1,487
 
 
 7,033
 
 8,585
0.4
 0.1
 
 
 1.7
 
 
 
 
 1.8
Treasury stock repurchase(572) (57) 572
 57
 
 
 
 (75,778) 
 (75,778)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
 
 
 
 19,469
 
 
 
 
 19,469
Dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,884) 
 
 (2,884)
 
 
 
 
 
 (2.9) 
 
 (2.9)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
 
 36,515
 
 
 
 
 36,515

 
 
 
 43.7
 
 
 
 
 43.7
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,370) (2,370)
ASU 2018-02 adoption
 
 
 
 
 (4.8) 4.8
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,973
 1,973

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 0.1
 0.1
Balance at October 31, 201448,143
 $4,815
 2,840
 $284

$1,386,800

$(106,182)
$1,578,823
 $(294,662)
$18,562
 $2,588,440
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders
 
 
 
 
 
 203,523
 
 
 203,523
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 (85,461) 
 
 
 (85,461)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans593
 59
 (18) (2) (6,690) 
 
 1,817
 
 (4,816)
Treasury stock repurchase(468) (47) 468
 47
 
 
 
 (67,304) 
 (67,304)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
 
 
 
 18,268
 
 
 
 
 18,268
Dividends on common stock
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,906) 
 
 (2,906)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 
 
 32,879
 
 
 
 
 32,879
Purchase of shares from noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 3,448
 
 
 
 (11,518) (8,070)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (714) (714)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 65
 65
Balance at October 31, 201548,268
 $4,827
 3,290
 $329

$1,434,705

$(191,643)
$1,779,440

$(360,149)
$6,395
 $2,673,904
Balance at October 31, 201849.2
 $5.0
 3.6
 $0.3
 $1,572.1
 $(430.7) $2,576.0
 $(415.1) $0.2
 $3,307.8

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

70




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended October 31,
(In thousands)
2015
2014
2013
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
     
Net income$205,144
 $271,829
 $296,906
$139.9
 $372.9
 $274.9
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 



 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense191,403
 138,201
 125,349
275.1
 188.4
 198.3
Impairment of intangibles24.4
 
 
Share-based compensation expense32,879
 36,515
 28,538
43.2
 37.2
 29.9
Loss on divestiture of Aime
 
 21,062
Inventory step-up release50.5
 
 
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment42,415
 9,814
 6,711
5.1
 6.1
 30.6
Deferred income taxes5,582
 (16,005) (17,188)2.9
 (7.1) (10.7)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation awards(17,300) (19,300) (18,081)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation awards (1)

 
 (19.8)
Provision for doubtful accounts(69) 764
 890
8.2
 2.3
 2.6
Change in assets and liabilities:

 

 



 

 

Accounts receivable(4,528) (5,167) 55
(59.5) (25.1) 1.6
Inventories(37,357) (7,582) (22,574)(5.0) (30.9) 12.2
Other assets(22,595) (13,468) (22,870)(64.9) (13.8) (5.2)
Accounts payable10,108
 1,288
 (6,294)2.9
 25.0
 (10.5)
Accrued liabilities(10,658) 34,017
 (983)81.2
 18.9
 9.1
Accrued income taxes(4,342) 18,098
 27,717
4.4
 9.9
 (8.9)
Other long-term liabilities288
 5,819
 (3,313)160.5
 9.8
 5.5
Cash provided by operating activities390,970
 454,823
 415,925
668.9
 593.6
 509.6
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 

 
 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(243,023) (238,065) (178,127)(193.6) (127.2)
(152.6)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and other(44,924) (1,109,702) (13,045)
Insurance proceeds received
 1,359
 1,254
Acquisitions of assets and businesses, net of cash acquired, and other
(1,323.9) (254.1)
(266.1)
Cash used in investing activities(287,947) (1,346,408) (189,918)(1,517.5) (381.3) (418.7)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 

 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt1,201,300
 2,561,700
 1,767,000
2,748.1
 1,413.8
 1,577.3
Repayments of long-term debt(1,372,129) (1,666,441) (1,813,663)(1,912.1) (1,364.6) (1,460.4)
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term debt184,787
 (7,331) 21,036
Payment of loan notes issued for Sauflon acquisition(51,208) 
 
Net proceeds (repayments of) from short-term debt13.6
 (211.7) (131.9)
Repurchase of common stock(67,304) (75,778) (167,334)
 (55.0) 
Net (payments) proceeds related to share-based compensation awards(4,816) 8,585
 19,287
Proceeds related to share-based compensation awards22.3
 10.7

20.4
Payments related to share-based compensation awards(20.5) (16.0) (13.2)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation awards(1)17,300
 19,300
 18,081

 
 19.8
Purchase of Origio shares from noncontrolling interests(8,070) 
 (4,199)
 
 (2.2)
Dividends on common stock(2,906) (2,884) (2,918)(2.9) (2.9) (2.9)
Debt issuance costs
 (925) (210)(3.9) 
 (12.6)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(1,110) (2,438) (1,007)
 
 (0.7)
Payment of contingent consideration(3,231) (3,819) (3,600)(0.2) (4.3) (0.5)
Proceeds from construction allowance710
 12,196
 5,930

 2.1
 5.5
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities(106,677) 842,165
 (161,597)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(5,142) (2,751) 143
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(8,796) (52,171) 64,553
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year25,222
 77,393
 12,840
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$16,426
 $25,222
 $77,393
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities844.4
 (227.9) (1.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(4.4) 3.6
 (5.1)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(8.6) (12.0) 84.4
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year88.8
 100.8
 16.4
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year80.2
 88.8
 100.8
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 



 

 

Cash paid for:

 

 



 

 

Interest, net of amounts capitalized$14,035
 $4,149
 $5,428
$82.1
 $31.3
 $23.7
Income taxes$12,167
 $15,918
 $13,971
$18.8
 $15.6
 $29.4
Litigation settlement charges$17,000
 $
 $
Reconciliation of cash flow information:     
Cash and cash equivalents$77.7
 $88.8
 $100.8
Restricted cash included in other current assets (2)
$2.5
 $
 $
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$80.2
 $88.8
 $100.8



(1) We adoptedASU 2016-09, Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting in fiscal 2017. Excess tax benefits have been classified as operating activity on a prospective basis from fiscal 2017.

(2) We adopted ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. Amounts included in restricted cash represent those required to be set aside by a financial arrangement. See Note 1. Accounting Policies for additional information

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


71



THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
Year Ended October 31,
(In thousands)
2014
On August 6, 2014, The Cooper Companies, Inc. acquired all of the issued share capital of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Limited for total consideration of approximately $1.13 billion. Liabilities were assumed as follows: 
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities: 
Fair value of assets acquired$1,305,828
Less: 
Cash paid, net of cash acquired1,063,077
Loan notes issued57,954
Liabilities assumed$184,797

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

72


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General
The Cooper Companies, Inc. (Cooper, we or the Company) is a global medical device company publicly traded on the NYSE Euronext (NYSE:COO). Cooper is dedicated to being A Quality of Life CompanyTM with a focus on delivering shareholder value. Cooper operates through our business units, CooperVision and CooperSurgical.
CooperVision primarily develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of soft contact lenses for the worldwide vision correction market.
CooperSurgical primarily develops, manufactures, and markets medical devices and procedureprocedures solutions, and provides services to improve healthcarehealth care delivery to women.women, babies and families.

Estimates and CriticalSignificant Accounting Policies
 
ManagementManagement's significant accounting policies include estimates and judgments which are an integral part of financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We believe that the critical accounting policies described in this section address the more significant estimates required ofpolicies utilized by management when preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We consider an accounting estimate critical if changes in the estimate may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe that the accounting policies and estimates employed are appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in future periods. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most important to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are:

Revenue recognition - We recognize product net sales, net of discounts, returns and rebates in accordance with related accounting standards and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins. As required by these standards, we recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned, based on terms of sale with the customer, where persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred, the seller's price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. For contact lenses as well as CooperSurgical medical devices,CooperSurgical's office and surgical products, fertility and diagnostic products and surgical instruments and accessories,services, this primarily occurs when title and risk of ownership transfers to our customers.customers, and/or when services are rendered. We believe our revenue recognition policies are appropriate in all circumstances, and that our policies are reflective of our customer arrangements. We record, based on historical statistics, estimated reductions to revenue for customer incentive programs offered including cash discounts, promotional and advertising allowances, volume discounts, contractual pricing allowances, chargebacks, rebates and specifically established customer product return programs. We record taxes collected from customers on a net basis, as these taxes are not included in net sales.
Net realizable value of inventory - In assessing the value of inventories, we make estimates and judgments regarding aging of inventories and other relevant issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products and estimated prices at which those products will sell. On an ongoing basis, we review the carrying value of our inventory, measuring number of months on hand and other indications of saleability. We reduce the value of inventory if there are indications that the carrying value is greater than market,net realizable value, resulting in a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory. Subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. While estimates are involved, historically, obsolescence has not been a significant factor due to long product dating and lengthy product life cycles.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Valuation of goodwill - We account for goodwill and evaluate our goodwill balances and test them for impairment annually during the fiscal third quarter and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that impairment may exist in accordance with related accounting standards. We performed our annual impairment test in our fiscal third quarter of 2015,2018, and our analysis

73


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


indicated that we had no impairment of goodwill. We performed our annual impairment test in our fiscal third quarter of 20142017 and concluded that we had no impairment of goodwill in that year.
In fiscal 2015 and 2014, we performed qualitative assessments to test each reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Qualitative factors considered in this assessment include industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and other relevant events and factors affecting each reporting unit. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not to be less than its carrying amount, the two-step impairment test will be performed.
Initially, we compare the book value of net assets to the fair value of each reporting unit that has goodwill assigned to it. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. A reporting unit is the level of reporting at which goodwill is tested for impairment. Our reporting units are the same as our business segments - CooperVision and CooperSurgical - reflecting the way that we manage our business.

Goodwill impairment analysis and measurement is a process that requires significant judgment. If our common stock price trades below book value per share, there are changes in market conditions or a future downturn in our business, or a future annual goodwill impairment test indicates an impairment of our goodwill, we may have to recognize a non-cash impairment of our goodwill that could be material, and could adversely affect our results of operations in the period recognized and also adversely affect our total assets, stockholders' equity and financial condition.
We test goodwill impairment in accordance with ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. We perform a qualitative assessment to test each reporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Qualitative factors considered in this assessment include industry and market considerations, overall financial performance and other relevant events and factors affecting each reporting unit. Based on our qualitative assessment, if we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not to be less than its carrying amount, the fair value of a reporting unit will be compared with its carrying amount and an impairment charge will be recognized for the carrying amount which exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. A reporting unit is the level of reporting at which goodwill is tested for impairment. Our reporting units are the same as our business segments - CooperVision and CooperSurgical - reflecting the way that we manage our business.

Business combinations - We routinely consummate business combinations. Results of operations for acquired companies are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition. We recognize separately from goodwill, the identifiable assets acquired, including acquired in-process research and development, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date fair values as defined by accounting standards related to fair value measurements. Key assumptions routinely utilized in allocation of purchase price to intangible assets include projected financial information such as revenue projections for companies acquired. As of the acquisition date, goodwill is measured as the excess of consideration given, generally measured at fair value, and the net of the acquisition date fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Direct acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Income taxes - We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and tax credit carryforwards.carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we must estimate our income tax expense for each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires significant management judgments and involves estimating our current tax exposures in each jurisdiction including the impact, if any, of additional taxes resulting from tax examinations as well as judging the recoverability of deferred tax assets. To the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


our estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction, a valuation allowance is established. Tax exposures can involve complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve. Frequent changes in tax laws in each jurisdiction complicate future estimates. To determine the tax rate, we are required to estimateuse the full-year income and the related income tax expense in each jurisdiction. We update the estimated effective tax rate for the effect of significant unusual items as they are identified. Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual pre-tax income can affect the overall effective tax rate, and such changes could be material.

74


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, we recognize the benefit from a tax position only if it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. We measure the income tax benefits from the tax positions that are recognized, assess the timing of the derecognition of previously recognized tax benefits and classify and disclose the liabilities within the consolidated financial statements for any unrecognized tax benefits based on the guidance in the interpretation of related accounting guidance for income taxes. The interpretation also provides guidance on how the interest and penalties related to tax positions may be recorded and classified within our Consolidated Statement of Income and presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as additional income tax expense.
Share-Based Compensation - We grant various share-based compensation awards, including stock options, performance unit shares, restricted stock and restricted stock units. Under fair value recognition provisions, share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating Cooper's stock price volatility, employee exercise behaviors and related employee forfeiture rates.
The expected life of the share-based awards is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting forfeiture and/or exercise. Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. In determining the expected volatility, management considers implied volatility from publicly-traded options on Cooper's common stock at the date of grant, historical volatility and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the continuous rates provided by the United States Treasury with a term equal to the expected life of the award. The dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share, divided by the stock price at the date of grant.
As share-based compensation expense recognized in our Consolidated Statement of Income is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the amount of expense has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant, based on historical experience, and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of the fair value recognition provisions, the compensation expense that we record in future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The new guidance modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other post retirement plans, including removing certain previous disclosure requirements, adding certain new disclosure requirements, and clarifying certain other disclosure requirements. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance and disclosure requirements during fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. See Note 9. Employee Benefits for additional information.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The guidance modifies disclosure requirements for fair value measurements under ASC 820. The ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


permitted. The Company adopted this guidance during fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, and it did not have an impact on the Company's disclosure.

In January 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which updates the income tax accounting in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to reflect the SEC interpretive guidance released on December 22, 2017, when the 2017 Act was signed into law. Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard is contained in Note 5. Income Taxes.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings (accumulated deficit) for stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Act and requires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted during interim or annual periods. The Company elected to early adopt the ASU 2018-02 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, which resulted in the reclassification of $4.8 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. Entities will apply the modification accounting guidance if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. The update did not change the accounting for modifications. ASU 2017-09 will be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance during third quarter of fiscal 2018, and it did not have a material impact on the Company's reported financial results.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 provides guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2016-18 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and updated the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to incorporate restricted cash included in other current assets. The adoption has no significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230). The guidance reduces diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the Statements of Cash Flows. The guidance also clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and is applicable to the Company in fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance during third quarter of fiscal 2018, and it did not have a material impact on the Company's reported financial results.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. Under current guidance, an entity subsequently measures inventory at the lower of cost or market, with market defined as replacement cost, net realizable value (NRV), or NRV less a normal profit margin. An entity uses current replacement cost provided that it is not above NRV (i.e., the ceiling) or below NRV less an approximately normal profit margin (i.e., the floor). ASU 2015-11 eliminates this analysis and requires entities to measure inventory “at the lower of cost and NRV.” ASU 2015-11 is effective prospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. The Company adopted this guidance on November 1, 2017, and it did not have a material impact on the Company's reported financial results.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Accounting Pronouncements Issued and Not Yet Adopted

In April 2015,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other - Internal Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service ContractInterest - Imputation. This guidance requires companies to apply the internal-use software guidance in ASC 350-40 to implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to determine whether to capitalize certain implementation costs or expense them as incurred. We are currently evaluating the impact of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. We do not anticipate the adoption of these amendments,ASU 2018-15 which areis effective for the Company for thein our fiscal year and interim periods beginning on November 1, 2020.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The ASU requires an entity to disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. The service cost component is presented in the same line items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period and the other components of net benefit costs are presented separately as other income/expense below income from operations. ASU 2017-07 is effective for the Company in fiscal year and interim periods beginning on November 1, 2019, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences on an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The ASU changes the timing of the recognition of the income tax consequences of non-inventory transfers which under current guidance defers the income tax consequences until the asset is sold to an outside party or otherwise recognized. The guidance for the amendments of ASU 2016-16 requires companies to apply a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-16 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 on a modified retrospective basis. The Company will record the cumulative effect of the change as a decrease to retained earnings of approximately $23.0 million, with a corresponding decrease to prepaid tax. The cumulative effect adjustment represents the recognition of unrecognized income tax effects from intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory that occurred prior to the date of adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires that a lessee recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from operating leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use (ROU) asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and ASU 2018-11, Leases Topic 842 Target improvements, which provides an additional (and optional) transition method whereby the new lease standard is applied at the adoption date and recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings. This standard is effective for the Company in our fiscal year and interim periods beginning on November 1, 2019.

We anticipate this standard to have a material impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and related disclosures due to the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases. However, we do not expect adoption to have a material impact on our Consolidated Income Statements. We are continuing to assess and evaluate the potential impacts of the standard as well the election of transition method and certain practical expedients available within the ASU. We are in the process of documenting and analyzing our lease contracts, assessment of business processes and controls, selecting a system solution and completing our analysis of information necessary to determine the impact to the consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.statements.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 sets forth a new revenue recognition model that requires identifying the contract, identifying the performance obligations, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to performance obligations and recognizing the revenue upon satisfaction of performance obligations. The amendments in the ASU can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the update recognized at the date of the initial application along with additional disclosures. We are currently evaluating the impact ofwill adopt ASU 2014-09 which is effective for the Companyand its related additional disclosures in our fiscal year and interim periods beginning on November 1, 2018.2018 and we will apply the modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

75


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

On November 1, 2014, we adopted ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit whenAccounts Receivable Factoring Program

We may factor certain designated trade receivables with one or more third party financial institutions pursuant to a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 requires an unrecognized tax benefitfactoring agreement. These are non-recourse factoring arrangements to assist us in managing operating cash flow and meet the requirements to be presentedaccounted for as sales in accordance with the financial statements“Transfers and Servicing” guidance in ASC 860, where the Company’s continuing involvement subsequent to the transfer is limited to providing certain servicing and collection actions on behalf of the purchasers of the designated trade receivables. Proceeds from amounts factored by the Company are recorded as an increase to cash and a reduction to a deferred tax asset when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. When a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available, or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presentedaccounts receivable outstanding in the financial statementsCompany's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash flows attributable to factoring are reflected as a liabilitycash flows from operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Factoring fees associated with the sale of factored receivables for the year ended October 31, 2018 were $1.0 million and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.were minimal for the year ended October 31, 2017.

Consolidation
 
The financial statements in this report include the accounts of all of Cooper's consolidated entities. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.

Foreign Currency Translation
 
Most of our operations outside the United States use their local currency as their functional currency. We translate these assets and liabilities into United States dollars at year-end exchange rates. We translate income and expense accounts at weighted average rates for each year.month. We record gains and losses from the translation of financial statements in foreign currencies into United States dollars in other comprehensive income. We record gains and losses from changes in exchange rates on transactions denominated in currencies other than each reporting location's functional currency in net income for each period. We recorded in other expense and income a net foreign exchange loss of $3.5$3.4 million for fiscal 2015, a net foreign exchange loss of $2.92018, $1.4 million for fiscal 20142017 and a net foreign exchange gain of $0.1$1.6 million for fiscal 2013.
Divested Operation
Aime Divestiture - On October 31, 2013, we completed a transaction to sell Aime, our rigid gas-permeable contact lens and solutions business in Japan, to Nippon Contact Lens Inc. The business was originally obtained as part of the December 1, 2010 acquisition which included obtaining the rights to market Biofinity in Japan. The divestiture was consistent with CooperVision’s strategy to focus on its core soft contact lens business.
The Aime divestiture was originally announced on May 31, 2013 and met the criteria for classification as held for sale during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2013, we completed several conditions to closing and facilitated the transfer of manufacturing technology. We recorded a pre-tax loss of approximately $21.1 million in our Consolidated Statement of Income for fiscal 2013. Results from operations of Aime are included in our Consolidated Statements of Income for fiscal 2013 and we have not segregated the results of operations or net assets of Aime on our financial statements for any period presented. The disposition of the assets and liabilities of Aime did not qualify for classification as discontinued operations as CooperVision shall maintain continuing involvement through a distribution arrangement with Aime for a minimum of three years. The financial statement impact of the Aime product line was not material for any of the fiscal years presented.

Financial Instruments
We may use derivatives to reduce market risks associated with changes in foreign exchange and interest rates. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. We believe that the counterparties with which we

76


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


enter into forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements are financially sound and that the credit risk of these contracts is not significant.

We operate multiple foreign subsidiaries that manufacture and/or sell our products worldwide. As a result, our earnings, cash flow and financial position are exposed to foreign currency risk from foreign currency denominated receivables and payables, sales transactions, capital expenditures and net investment in certain foreign operations. Our policy is to minimize, to the extent reasonable and practical, transaction, remeasurement and specified economic exposures with derivatives instruments such as foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency swaps. The gains and losses on these derivatives are intended to at least partially offset the transaction gains and losses recognized in earnings.
Exposures are reduced whenever possible by taking advantage of offsetting payable and receivable balances and netting net sales against expenses, also referred to as natural hedges. We may employ the use of foreign currency derivative instruments to manage a portion of the remaining foreign exchange risk. Our risk management objectives and the strategies for achieving those objectives depend on the type of exposure being hedged.
We are also exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, as the interest rate on our credit agreements vary. To mitigate this risk, we may hedge portions of our variable rate debt by swapping those portions to fixed rates. We only enter into derivative financial instruments with institutions with which we have an International Swap Dealers Association (ISDA) agreement in place. When applicable, we record interest rate derivatives as net on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, in accordance with derivative accounting. When we net or set-off our interest rate derivative obligations, only the net asset or liability position will be credit affected. For the years ending October 31, 2014 and 2013, all of our interest rate derivatives were in a liability position and, therefore, were not set-off in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We had no outstanding interest rate swaps at October 31, 2015. Since ISDA agreements are signed between the Company and each respective financial institution, netting is permitted on a per institution basis only. On an ongoing basis, we monitor counterparty credit ratings. We consider our credit non-performance risk to be minimal because we award and disperse derivatives business between multiple commercial institutions that have at least an investment grade credit rating.

On March 10, 2011, we entered into five floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps to fix the floating rate debt under our revolving Credit Agreement or any future credit facility whose variable debt is tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). These interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $200.0 million, served to fix the floating rate debt for remaining terms between 2 and 14 months with fixed rates between 1.27% and 1.78%. We qualified and designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and recorded the offset of the cumulative fair market value (net of tax effect) to accumulated other comprehensive income in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. At October 31, 2015, we had no outstanding interest rate swaps.

Effectiveness testing of the hedge relationship and measurement to quantify ineffectiveness is performed at a minimum each fiscal quarter using the hypothetical derivative method. Effective amounts are reclassified to interest expense as the related hedged expense is incurred.2016.

Litigation

We are subject to various legal proceedings, claims, litigation, investigations and contingencies arising out of the ordinary course of business. If we believe the likelihood of an adverse legal outcome is probable and the amount is estimable, we accrue a liability in accordance with accounting guidance for contingencies. We consult with legal counsel on matters related to litigation and seek input both within and outside the Company.


77


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Insurance Proceeds
On October 28, 2011, a manufacturing building in the United Kingdom experienced an incident in which a pipe broke in our fire suppression system, causing water and fire retardant foam damage to the facility. While this incident did not substantially impact our existing customers, the repairs to the facility and resultant decrease in manufacturing capacity impacted the timing of marketing initiatives to generate additional sales. In January 2013, we resolved our business interruption claim with our insurer for a total of $19.1 million. We received payments of $5.0 million in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2012. In our fiscal first quarter of 2013, we recorded the remaining $14.1 million in our Consolidated Statement of Income of which we received payment of $2.9 million during the fiscal first quarter of 2013 and the remaining $11.2 million in the fiscal second quarter of 2013.
Long-lived Assets
 
We review long-lived assets held and used, intangible assets with finite useful lives and assets held for sale for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If an evaluation of recoverability is required, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with the asset group are compared to the asset'sasset group's carrying amount to determine if a write-down is required. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. If management has committed to a plan to dispose of long-lived assets, the assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell.
 
CooperVision provides optometric practices with in-office lenses used in marketing programs to facilitate efficient and convenient fitting of contact lenses by practitioners. Such lens fitting sets generally consist of a physical binder or rack to store contact lenses and an array of lenses. We record the costs associated with the original fitting set to other long-term assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We amortize such costs over their estimated useful lives to selling, general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income. We also expense the cost for lenses provided to practitioners as replenishment for fitting sets in the period shipped to selling, general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents includeThe Company considers all short-term, income producinghighly liquid investments purchased with maturity datesmaturities of three months or less.less to be cash equivalents. These investments are readily convertible to cash and are carried at cost, which approximates marketfair value.
 

78


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Inventories
October 31,
(In millions)
2015 20142018 2017
Raw materials$80.9
 $76.9
$112.5
 $107.0
Work-in-process14.5
 14.3
12.6
 13.3
Finished goods324.3
 290.3
343.7
 333.8

$419.7
 $381.5
$468.8
 $454.1
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost that approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis.

Property, Plant and Equipment
 
October 31,
(In millions)
2015 20142018 2017
Land and improvements$19.8

$20.6
$18.3

$17.7
Buildings and improvements226.1

205.5
305.0

279.2
Machinery and equipment1,085.1

980.8
1,420.7

1,270.5
Construction in progress319.7

319.0
186.3

190.1
Property, plant and equipment, at cost

$1,930.3
 $1,757.5
Less: Accumulated depreciation683.6

588.6
954.3

847.4

$967.1

$937.3
$976.0

$910.1
 
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method in amounts sufficient to write off depreciable assets over their estimated useful lives. We amortize leasehold

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


improvements over their estimated useful lives or the period of the related lease, whichever is shorter. We depreciate buildings over 3530 to 40 years and machinery and equipment over 3 to 15 years.
 
We expense costs for maintenance and repairs and capitalize major replacements, renewals and betterments. We eliminate the cost and accumulated depreciation of depreciable assets retired or otherwise disposed of from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts and reflect any gains or losses in operations for the period. We had capitalized interest included in construction in progress of $6.2$3.9 million and $5.6$5.2 million for the years ended October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.

Earnings Per Share
 
We determine basic earnings per share (EPS) by using the weighted average number of shares outstanding. We determine diluted EPS by increasing the weighted average number of shares outstanding in the denominator by the number of outstanding dilutive equity awards using the treasury stock method.
 
Treasury Stock
 
We record treasury stock purchases under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock. At October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the number of shares in treasury was 3,290,318approximately 3.6 million and 2,840,279,3.6 million, respectively. A total of 467,539No shares were repurchased during the year ended October 31, 2018 and 257,500 shares were purchased during the year ended October 31, 2015, and 571,939 shares were purchased during the year ended October 31, 2014.2017. See Note 87. Stockholders' Equity for additional information on the share repurchase program.


79


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 2. Acquisitions
Sauflon AcquisitionThe following is a summary of the allocation of the total purchase consideration for acquisitions that the Company completed during the fiscal periods 2018, 2017 and 2016:
(In millions)2018 2017 2016
Technology$
 $71.7
 $32.9
Customer relationships23.5
 43.1
 47.3
Trademarks100.0
 7.1
 13.7
Composite intangible asset
1,061.9
 
 
Other4.2
 
 0.1
Total identifiable intangible assets$1,189.6
 $121.9
 $94.0
Goodwill70.6
 123.1
 164.7
Net tangible assets (liabilities)59.6
 (4.8) (0.9)
Total purchase price$1,319.8
 $240.2
 $257.8
All the acquisitions were paid in cash and funded by our debt borrowings.
For asset acquisitions, we recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated relative fair values as of the applicable date of acquisition. For business acquisitions, we recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values as of the applicable date of acquisition with the excess of purchase price recorded as goodwill.
We believe these acquisitions strengthen CooperSurgical's and CooperVision's businesses through the addition of new or complementary products and services.
Fiscal Year 2018

PARAGARD
On November 1, 2017, CooperSurgical acquired the assets of the PARAGARD Intrauterine Device (IUD) business (PARAGARD) from Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited for $1.1 billion.
This asset acquisition broadens and strengthens CooperSurgical's current product portfolio. PARAGARD® is the only hormone-free, long lasting, reversible contraceptive approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) available in the United States.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition of PARAGARD as a purchase of assets in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, and ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, whereby the Company recognized assets acquired based on their estimated relative fair values on the acquisition date. Due to the required screening test, the acquisition does not meet the definition of a business as substantially all the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset. The Company retained independent appraisers to advise management in the determination of the relative fair value of the various assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The values assigned in these financial statements represent management’s best estimate of relative fair values as of the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes the relative fair values of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the cost accumulation and allocation model:

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(In millions)Relative Fair Value
Composite intangible asset (1)
$1,061.9
Assembled workforce intangible asset (2)
1.2
Property, plant and equipment2.0
Inventory (3)
47.3
Other assets9.4
Total assets acquired$1,121.8
Less: liabilities assumed16.4
Total Purchase Price$1,105.4
The Company proportionally allocated the acquisition costs to the net assets acquired. The acquisition-related costs included advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees.

(1) Composite Intangible asset consists of technology, trade name, New Drug Application (NDA) approval and physician relationships, which have been valued as a single composite intangible asset as they are inextricably linked. The composite asset was identified as the primary asset acquired, was valued using the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method and will be amortized over 15 years
(2) An assembled workforce was recognized as a separate acquired intangible asset, given the purchase of assets and will be amortized over 5 years.
(3) Inventory relative fair value includes step up of $45.4 million.
As PARAGARD was considered an asset purchase as opposed to a business acquisition in accordance with the guidance under ASC 805, Business Combinations, and ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, the Company has not included proforma financial information which is applicable for a business acquisition.
Other Acquisitions
On April 3, 2018, CooperSurgical completed the acquisition of The LifeGlobal Group (LifeGlobal). LifeGlobal was a privately held company that specializes primarily in IVF media. LifeGlobal’s product categories include media products as well as IVF laboratory air filtration products and dishware. We have completed the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
On December 1, 2017, CooperVision acquired Paragon Vision Sciences, a leading provider of orthokeratology (ortho-k) specialty contact lenses and oxygen permeable rigid contact lens materials. Ortho-k contact lenses are overnight lenses which enable corneal topography correction for myopia (nearsightedness) patients. We have completed the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
On January 4, 2018, CooperVision acquired Blueyes Ltd, a long-standing distribution partner, with a leading position in the distribution of contact lenses to the Optical and Pharmacy sector in Israel. We have completed the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.
The pro forma results of operations of these acquisitions have not been presented because the effects of the business combinations described above, individually and in the aggregate, were not material to our consolidated results of operations.
Fiscal Year 2017
Purchase price allocation for the following acquisitions in fiscal year 2017 and 2016 are completed.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


On August 6, 2014, which we refer to as the Sauflon acquisition date, we3, 2017, CooperVision completed the acquisition of Procornea Holding B.V. (Procornea). Procornea is a Netherlands based manufacturer and distributor of specialty contact lenses, mainly ortho-k which expands CooperVision's access to myopia (nearsightedness) management markets with new products.
On June 30, 2017, CooperVision completed the entire issued share capitalacquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Limited (Sauflon)Grand Vista LLC, a long-standing distribution partner in Russia. Grand Vista LLC is engaged in contact lens and contact lens solutions and lens care product distribution business in Russia.
On November 4, 2016, CooperSurgical completed the acquisition of Wallace, the IVF segment of Smiths Medical International, Ltd., a privately-owned Europeandivision of Smiths Group plc. Wallace manufactures a range of IVF and ob/gyn products.
Fiscal Year 2016
On September 6, 2016, CooperVision completed the acquisition of Soflex, an Israel based manufacturer and distributor of soft contact lenseslenses.
On May 31, 2016, CooperSurgical completed the acquisition of Reprogenetics UK, a U.K.-based genetics laboratory specializing in service offerings of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and solutions, that waspreimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) used during the IVF process.
On May 25, 2016, CooperSurgical completed the acquisition of Recombine Inc., a United States based clinical genetic testing company specializing in Twickenham, United Kingdom. The fair value of the consideration transferred for Sauflon was approximately $1,073.2 million in cash, $1,063.1 million net of cash acquired, and approximately $58.0 millioncarrier screening. Recombine operates in the form of loan notes issued by Cooper. The loan notes were denominated in British poundsIVF market and redeemed and paid in our fiscal second quarter of 2015.creates comprehensive genetic carrier screening tests.

We acquired Sauflon to accelerate the growth in sales of our single-use products by enabling a multi-tier, single-use strategy with a full suite of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel product offerings in the major product categories of sphere, toric and multifocal lenses. This acquisition was also intended to provide for enhanced relationships with key European retailers and opportunities for operational synergies.

The acquisition was accounted for underOn May 4, 2016, CooperSurgical completed the acquisition method of accounting,Kivex Biotec A/S (K-Systems), a Danish manufacturer and the related assets acquireddistributor of equipment, including workstations and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. Whileincubators for IVF clinics.
On March 31, 2016 CooperSurgical completed the acquisition wasof Genesis Genetics Inc., a United States based genetics laboratory specializing in PGS and PGD used during the IVF process.
On February 8, 2016, CooperSurgical completed on August 6, 2014, we accountedthe acquisition of The Pipette Company, an Australian manufacturer and distributor of micro pipettes for the acquisition as of August 1, 2014, and have included the operating results of SauflonAssisted Reproductive Technology market, in our CooperVisionCSI business segment from that date. The impact of Sauflon's results of operations for the period August 1, 2014 through August 5, 2014 on our CooperVision business segment results of operations was de minimis. Similarly,segment.
On December 17, 2015, we have determined that any difference in the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed with respect to Sauflon between August 1, 2014 and August 6, 2014 was de minimis.

The following table summarizes our consideration paid for Sauflon and the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We repaid substantially all of the acquired debt concurrently withcompleted the acquisition with our available funds.of Research Instruments Limited (RI), a U.K. manufacturer and supplier of IVF medical devices and systems, in CSI business segment. RI specializes in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) products, develops and manufactures hardware, software and consumable products.

80


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(In millions)Useful Lives of Intangible AssetsFair Value
Goodwill $856.2
   
Trademarks10 years$7.2
Technology10 years138.2
Customer relationships15 years39.3
License and distribution rights and other2 to 5 years51.6
In-process research and developmentN/A43.1
Purchased intangible assets $279.4
   
Cash and cash equivalents $10.1
Property, plant and equipment 83.9
Inventories 36.2
Trade accounts receivable 42.3
Other current assets 6.9
Debt (85.1)
Accounts payable (23.6)
Long term deferred tax liabilities (56.7)
Other creditors and current liabilities (18.5)
Net tangible liabilities $(4.5)
   
Total purchase consideration $1,131.1

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the future economic benefits arising from the other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition of Sauflon was ascribed to our CooperVision business segment and is not amortized. This goodwill includes the following:
The expected synergies and other benefits that we believe will result from combining the operations of Sauflon with the operations of CooperVision;
Any intangible assets that did not qualify for separate recognition, as well as future, yet unidentified projects and products; and
The value of the going-concern element of Sauflon's existing businesses (the higher rate of return on the assembled collection of net assets versus if CooperVision had acquired all of the net assets separately).
Management determined fair values of the identifiable intangible assets through a combination of income approaches including relief from royalty, with-and-without, multi-period excess earnings and disaggregated methods. The valuation models were based on estimates of future operating projections of the acquired business and rights to sell products as well as judgments on the discount rates used and other variables. We determined the forecasts based on a number of factors, including our best estimate of near-term net sales expectations and long-term projections, which include review of internal and independent market analyses. The discount rate used was representative of the weighted average cost of capital.

The unaudited pro forma financial results presented below for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, include the effects of pro forma adjustments as if the acquisition occurred on November 1, 2012. The pro forma results were prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and combine the historical results of Cooper and Sauflon for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, including the effects of the business combination, primarily amortization expense related to the fair value of identifiable intangible assets

81


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


acquired, interest expense associated with the financing obtained by Cooper in connection with the acquisition, and the elimination of incurred acquisition-related costs.

The fiscal 2014 unaudited pro forma financial information is not adjusted to exclude $36.1 million of restructuring costs and costs incurred in the fiscal year to integrate the operations of Cooper with Sauflon. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the earliest period presented, nor is it intended to be a projection of future results.
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions, except per share amounts, pro forma, unaudited)            
2014 2013
Revenue$1,858.2
 $1,746.3
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders$276.0
 $284.9
Diluted earnings per share$5.64
 $5.73

The pro forma results for fiscal 2014 were adjusted to include pre-tax amortization of intangible assets totaling $22.2 million, and an additional $6.4 million of interest expense. The pro forma results were adjusted to exclude pre-tax acquisition-related costs totaling $20.4 million.
The pro forma results for fiscal 2013 were adjusted to include pre-tax amortization of intangible assets totaling $29.7 million and an additional $9.3 million of interest expense.
Origio Acquisition
On July 11, 2012, the acquisition date, we completed a voluntary tender offer for the outstanding shares of Origio a/s at a purchase price of NOK 28 per share in cash and acquired 97% of the outstanding shares. As a result, the fair value of the consideration transferred for Origio was approximately $147.4 million in cash, $143.6 million net of cash acquired. During our fiscal fourth quarter of 2012 and our fiscal first quarter of 2013, we completed a mandatory redemption to obtain the remaining shares in accordance with the Danish Companies Act.
Origio, based in Malov, Denmark, is a leading global in-vitro fertilization (IVF) medical device company that develops, manufactures and distributes highly specialized products that target IVF treatment with a goal to make fertility treatment safer, more efficient and convenient.
The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and the related assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. During the fiscal second quarter of 2013, we received the remaining information necessary to complete the fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for fixed assets, income taxes and commitments and contingencies resulting in a net increase to goodwill of $12.4 million. While we closed the acquisition of shares on July 11, 2012, we accounted for the acquisition as of July 1, 2012, and included the operating results of Origio in our CooperSurgical business segment from that date. The impact of Origio's results of operations for the period July 1, 2012 through July 10, 2012 on our CooperSurgical business segment results of operations was de minimis. Similarly, we have determined that any difference in the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed with respect to Origio between July 1, 2012 and July 11, 2012 was de minimis.
We allocated the fair value of the purchase price as follows: $8.5 million for working capital, including $3.8 million of cash, $22.4 million for property, plant and equipment, $1.9 million for net other liabilities, $25.6 million for net deferred tax liabilities, $22.1 million for noncontrolling interests and $45.4 million of debt. We repaid substantially all of the acquired debt concurrent with the acquisition with available funds. Additionally, the allocation of the purchase price includes amortizable intangible assets of $107.7 million and goodwill of $103.7 million. The intangible assets include $82.1 million for customer relationships with

82


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


an estimated useful life of 15 years; $17.4 million for technology with an estimated useful life of 10 years; and $8.2 million for trade names with estimated useful lives of 17 years. We incurred $4.9 million of acquisition costs that were expensed in operations in fiscal 2012.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the future economic benefits arising from the other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition of Origio, of which $13.1 million is deductible for tax purposes, is ascribed to our CooperSurgical business segment and is not amortized. This goodwill includes the following:
The expected synergies and other benefits that we believed will result from combining the operations of Origio with the operations of CooperSurgical;
Any intangible assets that did not qualify for separate recognition, as well as future, yet unidentified projects and products; and
The value of the going-concern element of Origio's existing businesses (the higher rate of return on the assembled collection of net assets versus if CooperSurgical had acquired all of the net assets separately).
Management assigned fair values to the identifiable intangible assets through a combination of the discounted cash flow, multi-period excess earnings and relief from royalty methods. The valuation models were based on estimates of future operating projections of the acquired business and rights to sell products as well as judgments on the discount rates used and other variables. We determined the forecasts based on a number of factors including our best estimate of near-term net sales expectations and long-term projections, which include review of internal and independent market analyses. The discount rate used was representative of the weighted average cost of capital.
In fiscal 2012, the year we acquired Origio, the pro forma results of operations were not presented because the effects of the business combination described above was not material to our consolidated results of operations.

83


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 3. Restructuring and Integration Costs

2014 Sauflon Integration Plan
During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2014, in connection with the Sauflon acquisition, our CooperVision business unit initiated restructuring and integration activities to optimize operational synergies of the combined companies. These activities include workforce reductions, consolidation of duplicative facilities and product rationalization. We estimate the total restructuring costs under this plan to be $112.0 million. The $8.0 million increase over our fiscal third quarter estimate relates to additional product rationalization and related equipment disposals and accelerated depreciation, primarily related to our hydrogel contact lenses, based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. We expect to be substantially complete with activities related to operating expenses in our fiscal first quarter of 2016, and to incur costs related to manufacturing activities through the end of fiscal 2016.

These estimated costs include approximately $89.0 million associated with assets, including product rationalization and related equipment disposals and accelerated depreciation, about $19.0 million associated with employee termination costs and about $4.0 million associated with facility lease termination costs.    

In fiscal 2015, we recorded in cost of sales $57.7 million of expense, arising from production-related asset disposals and accelerated depreciation on equipment, primarily related to our hydrogel lenses, based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon. We recorded in cost of sales $4.0 million of employee termination costs. We reduced in selling, general and administrative expense, the accrued employee termination costs by $7.2 million, based on current estimates of the expected costs and the results of voluntary terminations; and we recorded $0.4 million of expense for lease termination costs. We recorded in research and development expense $0.7 million of employee termination costs. In addition, CooperVision incurred $35.2 million of integration costs in fiscal 2015, included in operating expenses.

In fiscal 2014, we recorded restructuring charges of $20.3 million for employee termination costs; $15.3 million for product rationalization, including inventory write-offs and production-related asset impairments, primarily related to our Avaira toric contact lenses, based on our review of products, materials and manufacturing processes of Sauflon; and $0.5 million of lease termination costs for facility closures. In addition, CooperVision incurred $2.8 million of integration costs recorded in selling, general and administrative expense. Of the employee termination costs, $19.7 million are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense and $0.6 million in research and development expense. The product rationalization costs are recorded in cost of sales. The lease termination costs and other related costs are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense.

A summary of the total restructuring costs by major component recognized for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, and October 31, 2014, is as follows:
(In millions)Employee-related Facilities-related Product Rationalization Total
Amounts incurred in:       
Year ended October 31, 2014$20.3
 $0.5
 $15.3
 $36.1
Year ended October 31, 2015(2.5) 0.4
 57.7
 55.6
Cumulative amounts incurred as of October 31, 2015$17.8
 $0.9
 $73.0
 $91.7


84


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The following table summarizes the restructuring activities by major component:
(In millions)Employee-related Facilities-related Product Rationalization Total
Additions during fiscal 2014$20.3
 $0.5
 $15.3
 $36.1
Payments during the fiscal year(0.4) 
 
 (0.4)
Non-cash adjustments (b)
 
 (15.3) (15.3)
Balance at October 31, 2014$19.9
 $0.5
 $
 $20.4
(Reductions) additions during fiscal 2015(2.5) 0.4
 57.7
 55.6
Payments during the fiscal year(9.0) (0.4) 
 (9.4)
Non-cash adjustments (a) (b)0.2
 (0.2) (57.7) (57.7)
Balance as of October 31, 2015$8.6
 $0.3
 $
 $8.9
(a) Non-cash adjustments for employee-related and facilities-related costs represent currency translation adjustment.
(b) Non-cash adjustments for product rationalization represent equipment disposals, inventory write-offs and accelerated depreciation.



85


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 4.3. Intangible Assets
Goodwill
(In millions)CooperVision CooperSurgical Total
Balance as of October 31, 2013$1,048.5
 $339.1
 $1,387.6
Net additions during the year ended October 31, 2014857.1
 25.5
 882.6
Translation(44.1) (5.2) (49.3)
Balance as of October 31, 2014$1,861.5
 $359.4
 $2,220.9
Net (reductions) additions during the year ended October 31, 2015(1.2) 17.4
 16.2
Translation(32.7) (7.3) (40.0)
Balance as of October 31, 2015$1,827.6
 $369.5
 $2,197.1
(In millions)CooperVision CooperSurgical Total
Balance as of October 31, 2016$1,646.4
 $518.3
 $2,164.7
Net additions during the year ended October 31, 201728.6
 94.4
 123.0
Translation60.7
 6.4
 67.1
Balance as of October 31, 2017$1,735.7
 $619.1
 $2,354.8
Net additions during the year ended October 31, 201836.8
 34.4
 71.2
Translation(29.6) (4.3) (33.9)
Balance as of October 31, 2018$1,742.9
 $649.2
 $2,392.1

Of the October 31, 20152018 goodwill balance, $93.5$247.1 million for CooperSurgical and $51.8 million for CooperVision is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Of the October 31, 2017 goodwill balance, $117.9 million for CooperSurgical and $19.7 million for CooperVision is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Other Intangible Assets
As of October 31, 2015 As of October 31, 2014 As of October 31, 2018 As of October 31, 2017 
(In millions)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
& Translation
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
& Translation
 Weighted Average Amortization Period
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
& Translation
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
& Translation
 Weighted Average Amortization Period (In years)
        (In years)
Trademarks$23.7
 $4.4
 $21.3
 $2.9
 13$139.2
 $16.9
 $44.5
 $10.3
 14
Composite intangible asset1,061.9
 70.8
 
 
 15
Technology318.9
 114.7
 326.6
 93.8
 11395.0
 190.7
 428.8
 173.2
 11
Customer relationships247.0
 104.5
 233.2
 90.7
 14350.0
 168.6
 335.5
 145.3
 13
License and distribution rights and other71.7
 26.6
 73.5
 13.6
 874.9
 52.7
 69.2
 44.5
 9
661.3
 $250.2
 654.6
 $201.0
 122,021.0
 $499.7
 878.0
 $373.3
 14
Less accumulated amortization and translation250.2
   201.0
   499.7
   373.3
   
Other intangible assets, net$411.1
   $453.6
   $1,521.3
   $504.7
   
Included in Technology at October 31, 2015 is $39.5In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, CooperSurgical recognized an impairment charge of $24.4 million of acquired in-process research and development from Sauflon that is not amortized. See Note 2 for additional information on acquiredthe intangible assets acquired from Sauflon.
We estimate that amortization expense for our existing other intangible assets willRecombine Inc. as the cash flows expected to be $50.6 milliongenerated by this asset group over its estimated remaining life were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. CooperSurgical acquired Recombine Inc. in fiscal 2016, $47.4 milliona clinical genetic testing company specializing in fiscal 2017, $45.5 million in fiscalcarrier screening. The intangible assets impaired consisted of Technology, Trademark and Customer relationships.






THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



As of October 31, 2018, $42.7 million in fiscal 2019 and $31.9 million in fiscal 2020.the estimated future amortization expenses for intangible assets with finite lives is as follows:

86

Fiscal years:(In millions)
2019$143.0
2020133.3
2021132.0
2022130.1
Thereafter974.0
    Total remaining amortization for intangible assets$1,512.4


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 5.4. Debt
October 31,
(In millions)
2015 20142018 2017
Short-term:
 
Loan notes issued for Sauflon acquisition$
 $55.1
Overdraft and other credit facilities240.4
 46.4
$37.1
 $23.4
Current portion of long-term debt3.8
 
Short-term Debt$37.1
 $23.4
$244.2
 $101.5
   

   
Long-term:
 
Credit Agreement$109.0
 $279.5
$439.0
 $323.0
Term loans996.3
 1,000.0
1,550.0
 830.0
Other0.5
 1.3
0.2
 0.2
Less: unamortized debt issuance cost(3.5) (3.9)
Long-term Debt

$1,985.7
 $1,149.3
$1,105.8
 $1,280.8
   
Total Debt$2,022.8
 $1,172.7

AnnualFiscal year maturities of long-term debt as of October 31, 20152018, are as follows:
 
Year
(In millions)
  
2016$3.8
2017$824.1
2018$281.4
2019$
$
2020$
$
2021$564.2
2022$
2023$1,425.0
Thereafter$0.3
$
$400 million Term Loan on November 1, 2018
On November 1, 2018, subsequent to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, the Company entered into a 364-day, $400.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent which matures on October 31, 2019 (the 2018 Term Loan Agreement). The Company used the funds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under the 2016 Revolving Credit AgreementFacility. See Note 14. Subsequent Event for additional information.
$1.425 billion Term Loan on November 1, 2017
On May 31, 2012,November 1, 2017, in connection with the PARAGARD acquisition, we entered into a five-year, $1.425 billion, senior unsecured term loan agreement (2017 Term Loan Agreement) by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and DNB Bank ASA, New York Branch, as administrative agent which matures on November 1, 2022. The Company used part of the facility to fund the PARAGARD acquisition and used the remainder of the funds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.
Amounts outstanding under the 2017 Term Loan Agreement will bear interest, at our option, at either the base rate, or the adjusted LIBO rate (each as defined in the 2017 Term Loan Agreement), plus, in each case, an amendmentapplicable rate of, between 0.00% and 0.75% in respect of base rate loans and between 1.00% and 1.75% in respect of adjusted LIBO rate loans, in each case in accordance with a pricing grid tied to ourthe Total Leverage Ratio as defined in the 2017 Term Loan Agreement.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The 2017 Term Loan Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, as well as financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain Total Leverage Ratio and Interest Coverage Ratio (each as defined in the 2017 Term Loan Agreement) consistent with the 2016 Credit Agreement dated as of January 12, 2011discussed below. At October 31, 2018, we had $1.425 billion outstanding under the 2017 Term Loan Agreement.
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement on March 1, 2016
On March 1, 2016, we entered into a Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (2016 Credit Agreement), by and among the Company, CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. The 2016 Credit Agreement as amended, provides for a multicurrency revolving credit facility in an aggregate commitmentprincipal amount of $1.0 billion (2016 Revolving Credit Facility) and a term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $830.0 million (2016 Term Loan Facility), each of which, unless terminated earlier, mature on March 1, 2021. In addition, we have the aggregate commitment amount under the revolving facility may be increased, upon our written request, by $500.0 million. The amended Credit Agreement has a termination date of May 31, 2017.
In connection with the Sauflon acquisition, on June 30, 2014, we entered into an amendment (Credit Agreement Amendment) to the Credit Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2011, as amended, by and among (i) the Company, (ii) CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, (iii) the lendersability from time to time party thereto and (iv) Keybank National Association, as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement Amendment modifies certain provisionsto request an increase to the size of the 2016 Revolving Credit AgreementFacility or establish one or more new term loans under the 2016 Term Loan Facility in an aggregate amount up to among other things, amend certain restrictive covenants and related definitions$750.0 million, subject to allow for certain indebtedness, investments, guaranty obligations, acquisitions, intercompany loans, capital distributions and dispositions of assets made or to be made in connection with the acquisition.
The commitment fee rate ranges between 0.100% and 0.275%discretionary participation of the unused portion of the revolving facility based on a pricing grid tied to the Total Leverage Ratio (as defined below and in the Credit Agreement). The applicable margin rates on loanslenders.
Amounts outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement will bear interest, based, at our option, onat either the base rate, or the adjusted EurodollarLIBO rate (currently referred to as LIBOR) or adjusted foreign currency rate (each as defined in the amended2016 Credit Agreement), plus, in each case, an applicable marginrate of

87


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


between 0.00% and 0.75%, in respect of base rate loans and between 1.00% and 1.75% in respect of adjusted EurodollarLIBO rate or adjusted foreign currency rate loans, in each case in accordance with a pricing grid tied to the Total Leverage Ratio, as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement.
We pay an annual commitment fee that ranges from 0.125% to 0.25% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility depending on certain financial ratios. In addition to the annual commitment fee described above, we are also required to pay certain letter of credit and related fronting fees and other administrative fees pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement is not secured by any of the Company's, or any of its subsidiaries’, assets. All obligations under the Credit Agreement will be guaranteed by each of our existing and future direct and indirect material domestic subsidiaries.
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement and the term loans discussed below, we are also required to maintain specified financial ratios:
The ratio of Consolidated Proforma EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined, Interest Coverage Ratio) be at least 3.00 to 1.00 at all times.
The ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated Proforma EBITDA (as defined, Total Leverage Ratio) be no higher than 3.75 to 1.00.
At October 31, 2015, we were in compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio at 31.34 to 1.00 and the Total Leverage Ratio at 2.38 to 1.00.
At October 31, 2015, we had $890.8 million available under the Credit Agreement.
Uncommitted Revolving Lines of Credit on March 24, 2015
On March 24, 2015, we entered into uncommitted line of credit agreements with TD Bank, N.A. and Santander Bank, N.A. These lines of credit have a termination date of March 24, 2016, and each provide revolving loan amounts of up to $100.0 million, at the lender's option, with maturity dates of up to ninety days from the loan origination date. Amounts outstanding under these agreements will bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR for the period plus, 0.9%, payable in arrears on the last day of the period, as defined in the agreements.
At October 31, 2015,2018, we had $200.0$125.0 million outstanding under these agreements.

$300.0 millionthe 2016 Term Loan on September 12, 2013Facility and $560.5 million available under the 2016 Revolving Credit Facility.

On September 12, 2013, we entered into a five-year, $300.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement by and among the Company; the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. This syndicated credit facility, as subsequently amended, will mature on September 12, 2018, and will be subject to amortization of principal of 5.0% per annum payable quarterly beginning October 31,The 2016 with the balance payable at maturity.

Amounts outstanding under this term loan agreement will bear interest, at our option, at either the base rate, which is a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (a) KeyBank's prime rate, (b) 0.5% in excess of the federal funds effective rate and (c) 1% in excess of the adjusted Eurodollar rate (currently referred to as LIBOR) for a one-month interest period on such day, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus, in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margins will be determined quarterly by reference to a grid based upon the Total Leverage Ratio, as defined in the term loan agreement, and consistent with the revolving Credit Agreement discussed above.

This term loan agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, as well as financial covenants that require us to maintain a certain Total Leverage Ratiototal leverage ratio and Interest Coverage Ratio,interest coverage ratio, each as defined in the agreement, consistent with the revolving2016 Credit Agreement discussed above. The agreement also contains customary

88


Agreement:
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


events of default, the occurrence of which would permit the Administrative Agent to declare the principal, accrued interest and other obligations under the agreementInterest Coverage Ratio, as defined, to be immediately due and payable.at least 3.00 to 1.00 at all times.

In connection with the Sauflon acquisition, on June 30, 2014, we entered into an amendment to this term loan agreement, dated as of September 12, 2013, by and among (i) the Company, (ii) the lenders from time to time party thereto and (iii) KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. This term loan amendment modifies certain provisions of the term loan agreement to, among other things, amend certain restrictive covenants and related definitions to allow for certain indebtedness, investments, guaranty obligations, acquisitions, intercompany loans, capital distributions and dispositions of assets made or to be made in connection with the acquisition.

On August 4, 2014, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to this term loan agreement, dated as of September 12, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of June 30, 2014, by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. The term loan amendment modifies certain provisions of the term loan agreement to remove the call premium related to prepayments and/or refinancing of the term loan agreement, effective August 4, 2014.

At October 31, 2015, we had $300.0 million outstanding under the Term Loan.
$700.0 million Term Loan on August 4, 2014

On August 4, 2014, we entered into a three-year, $700.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement by and among the Company, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association as administrative agent. This syndicated credit facility will mature and the balance is payable on August 4, 2017. There is no amortization of principal and we may prepay loan balances from time to time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.

Amounts outstanding under this term loan agreement will bear interest, at our option, at either the base rate, which is a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (a) KeyBank’s prime rate, (b) 0.5% in excess of the federal funds effective rate and (c) 1% in excess of the adjusted Eurodollar rate (currently referred to as LIBOR) for a one-month interest period on such day, or the adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus, in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margins will be determined quarterly by reference to a grid based upon the Total Leverage Ratio, as defined, in the term loan agreement and consistent with the revolving Credit Agreement discussed above.

This term loan agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, as well as financial covenants that require us to maintain a certain Total Leverage Ratio and Interest Coverage Ratio, each as defined in the agreement, and consistent with the revolving Credit Agreement as discussed above. This term loan agreement also contains customary events of default, the occurrence of which would permit the Administrative Agent to declare the principal, accrued interest and other obligations under the agreement to be immediately due and payable.

In August 2014, we utilized this facilityno higher than 3.75 to fund the acquisition of Sauflon, as well as to provide working capital and for general corporate purposes.

1.00.
At October 31, 2015,2018, we had $700.0 million outstanding under this term loan.were in compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio at 10.66 to 1.00 and the Total Leverage Ratio at 2.21 to 1.00.


89


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


European Credit Facilities
 
We maintain European credit facilities in the form of continuing and unconditional guarantees. The aggregate facility limit was $33.2$35.4 million and $37.6$36.3 million at October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. We will pay all forms of indebtedness in the currency in which it is denominated for those certain subsidiaries. Interest expense is calculated on all outstanding balances based on an applicable base rate for each country plus a fixed spread common across most subsidiaries covered under the guaranty. At October 31, 2015, $8.62018, $0.3 million of the facility wasfacilities were utilized. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balances was 1.5%1.2%.
 

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


In addition to these European credit facilities, we also have available certain non-guaranteed Euro-denominated overdraft facilities. The aggregate facility limit was $0.7$0.7 million and $0.8$0.8 million at October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. At October 31, 2015,2018, none of this facility wasthese facilities were utilized.
 
Asian Pacific Credit Facilities
 
We maintain Yen-denominated credit facilities in Japan supported by continuing and unconditional guarantees. The aggregate facility limit was $49.7$53.2 million and $53.5$53.0 million at October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. We will pay all forms of indebtedness in Yen upon demand. Interest expense is calculated on the outstanding balance based on the base rate or TIBOR plus a fixed spread. At October 31, 2015, $29.22018, $35.1 million of the combined facilities waswere utilized. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balances was 0.5%0.4%.
We maintain credit facilities for certain of our Asia Pacific subsidiaries. Each facility is supported by a continuing and unconditional guaranty. The aggregate facility limit was $10.9$10.9 million and $11.9$11.4 million at October 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. We will pay all forms of indebtedness, for each facility, in the currency in which it is denominated for those certain subsidiaries. Interest expense is calculated on all outstanding balances based on an applicable base rate for each country plus a fixed spread common across all subsidiaries covered under each guaranty. At October 31, 2015, $0.32018, $0.4 million of the facility wasfacilities were utilized. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balances was 3.3%3.5%.
 
Letters of Credit
 
We maintain letters of credit throughout the world with various financial institutions that primarily serve as guarantee notes on certain debt obligations. The aggregate outstanding amount of letters of credit at October 31, 20152018 and October 31, 2017 was $2.5 million.$4.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

Note 6.5. Income Taxes

Recent Tax Legislation

The 2017 Act was enacted into law on December 22, 2017, and significantly changes existing U.S. tax law. The 2017 Act adopts a territorial tax system, imposes a mandatory one-time transition tax on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously indefinitely reinvested, and reduces the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%. The reduction in the U.S. federal statutory tax rate is effective on January 1, 2018, which requires the Company to use a blended tax rate for fiscal 2018. Our blended tax rate is 23.34% for fiscal 2018 and is calculated by applying a pro-rated percentage based on the number of days in our fiscal 2018 before and after the January 1, 2018 effective date. For fiscal 2019 and subsequent years, the Company will utilize the enacted U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%.

The 2017 Act includes several provisions that are effective for our fiscal 2019: (i) tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) of foreign subsidiaries, (ii) tax on certain payments between a U.S. corporation and its foreign subsidiaries referred to as the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT), (iii) limitation on the tax deduction for interest payments, and (iv) expanded limitation on the tax deduction for compensation paid to certain executives.

The 2017 Act was effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. As of October 31, 2018, we have not completed our accounting for the tax effects of the enactment of the 2017 Act. During 2018, we recorded a provisional tax expense of $214.6 million in our financial statements, based on reasonable estimates of the tax effects of the 2017 Act. The provisional tax expense is subject to revisions as we gather and

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


prepare additional information to complete our analysis of the 2017 Act, and interpret additional guidance issued by the FASB, Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Treasury Department. The provisional tax expense will be finalized during the measurement period, which should not extend beyond one year from the enactment date and could be materially different than our provisional tax expense. The provisional tax expense is described in more detail below.

During 2018, the Company recorded a $185.7 million provisional tax expense for the mandatory deemed repatriation of deferred foreign earnings and plans to pay the applicable amounts over eight years. The 2017 Act requires us to incur a one-time transition tax on deferred foreign income not previously subject to U.S. income tax at a rate of 15.5% for foreign cash and certain other net current assets, and 8% on the remaining deferred foreign income. We have not completed our analysis of the earnings and profits and foreign tax credits, which are critical inputs to the calculation.

During 2018, the Company completed its analysis and recorded a provisional tax expense of $20.0 million to record changes to deferred taxes resulting from the decrease in the U.S. federal tax rate. The amount is calculated using the applicable tax rates in the years in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to reverse.

Due to the changes in the 2017 Act, we reviewed our prior assertion that earnings from our foreign subsidiaries were indefinitely reinvested. For purposes of recording the provisional tax expense in 2018, we are no longer asserting that earnings from our foreign subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvested. Accordingly, we have recorded provisional estimates related to additional state income taxes of $7.0 million and withholding taxes of $1.9 million relating to the unremitted foreign earnings. We have not completed our analysis because we are still gathering additional information to quantify the impact to the individual states and to quantify the withholding taxes that would be owed when future dividends are paid to the U.S. As the Company completes its analysis, it will make appropriate changes to the financial statements within the measurement period.

Cooper'sThe 2017 Act imposes a new tax on foreign earnings and profits in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign subsidiaries referred to as GILTI. The 2017 Act also imposes a new tax on certain payments between a U.S. corporation and its foreign subsidiaries referred to as BEAT. These new provisions are effective for fiscal 2019. Due to the complexity of the new GILTI and BEAT tax rules, we are continuing to evaluate these new provisions and the application of GAAP. With respect to GILTI, FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. Given the complexity of the GILTI provisions, we are still evaluating the effect of the GILTI provisions and have not yet determined our accounting policy. The Company will continue its evaluation and make a policy election within the measurement period.

The 2017 Act limits the future deductions relating to interest expense and certain executive compensation. These provisions are generally effective for the Company in 2019. Pursuant to transition rules provided in the 2017 Act, companies will be allowed tax deductions for performance based plans in existence on or before November 2, 2017, if not materially modified after that date. We have completed our analysis of the executive compensation relating to plans in existence on or before November 2, 2017 and concluded that substantially all of those plans will meet the grandfather provisions and be fully deductible.

Diverted Profits Tax (DPT)


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The United Kingdom enacted a Diverted Profits Tax (DPT) as of April 1, 2015 on profits of multinationals that they deemed artificially diverted from the United Kingdom. The tax rate is 25%. DPT is intended to apply in two situations: (a) where a foreign company has artificially avoided having a taxable presence in the United Kingdom; and (b) where a group adopts a structure which lacks economic substance in order to divert profits from the United Kingdom.

During fiscal 2017, the U.K. Tax Authorities began an inquiry regarding the application of the DPT in fiscal 2015. We believe that the transactions in question were at arm’s length with no intention to divert profit from the United Kingdom and therefore are outside the intended reach of the DPT.

On December 20, 2017, the U.K. Tax Authorities issued a DPT charging notice of approximately GBP 31.0 million with respect to the transfer out of the United Kingdom of certain intellectual property rights in connection with the 2014 acquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceutical Ltd. Although taxes were paid on the transfer, the U.K. Tax Authorities are challenging the value assigned to such property. We have contested the charging notice. The process for resolving such a notice can be lengthy and could involve litigation. The DPT legislation provides a one-year review period; however, it requires prepayment of the charging notice to be made within 30 days of its issuance. As required, the payment of GBP 31.0 million was made on January 19, 2018.

The Company believes final resolution of the transfer value of intellectual property with the U.K. Tax Authorities is imminent. The outcome of final resolution is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. 
Effective Tax Rate

The Company’s effective tax rate (ETR) (provision for income taxes divided by pretax income)was 57.9%, 5.3% and 7.0% for fiscal 2015 was 4.8%2018, 2017 and fiscal 2014 was 8.3%.2016, respectively. The decrease in the ETR in fiscal 2015 reflects integration activities and discrete items including2018 increased in comparison to fiscal 2017 primarily due to the renewalnet charge related to the enactment of the R&D tax credit2017 Act which was partially offset by a shift in the United States.geographic mix of income. The ETR in fiscal 2017 decreased in comparison to fiscal 2016 due to the shift in the geographic mix of income as well as excess tax benefits from share-based compensation.

The ETR for 2018 is belowgreater than the United StatesU.S. federal statutory tax rate asprimarily due to the tax expense related to the enactment of the 2017 Act. The ETR for 2017 and 2016 is less than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate because a majority of our taxable income is earned in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates. The ratio of domestic income to worldwide income has decreased over recent fiscal years effectively lowering thesignificantly impacts our overall tax rate due to the fact that the tax rates in the majority of foreign jurisdictions where we operate are significantly lower than the statutory rate in the United States.

The components of income from continuing operations before income taxes and extraordinary items and the income tax provision related to income from all operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income consist of:


90

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)              
2018 2017 2016
Income before income taxes:
 
 
United States$(122.8) $7.8
 $31.5
Foreign454.7
 386.2
 264.1

$331.9
 $394.0
 $295.6
Income tax provision$192.0
 $21.1
 $20.7

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)              
2015 2014 2013
Income before income taxes:
 
 
United States$31.9

$32.5

$38.9
Foreign183.6

264.0

273.4

$215.5

$296.5

$312.3
Income tax provision$10.3

$24.7

$15.4
The income tax provision (benefit) related to income from continuing operations in our Consolidated Statements of Income consists of:
 
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Current:
 
 

 
 
Federal$0.2

$23.0

$21.6
$165.6
 $6.9
 $14.6
State1.2

1.1

1.1
0.5
 1.8
 1.3
Foreign3.3

16.6

9.9
23.0
 19.5
 15.5

4.7

40.7

32.6
189.1
 28.2
 31.4


    
Deferred:
 
 

 
 
Federal12.0

(5.3)
(8.1)16.1
 (3.9) (3.9)
State(0.5)
(0.9)
(0.8)1.0
 1.4
 (0.7)
Foreign(5.9)
(9.8)
(8.3)(14.2) (4.6) (6.1)

5.6

(16.0)
(17.2)2.9
 (7.1) (10.7)
Income tax provision$10.3

$24.7

$15.4
$192.0
 $21.1
 $20.7


91


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


We reconcile the provision for income taxes attributable to income from operations and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 23.34% for 2018 and 35% for 2017 to income before income taxes as follows:
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Computed expected provision for taxes$75.4
 $103.8

$109.3
$77.5
 $137.9
 $103.5
(Decrease) increase in taxes resulting from:
 
 

 
 
Income earned outside the United States subject to different tax rates(72.6) (85.5)
(97.0)
Income earned outside the U.S. subject to different tax rates(97.5) (114.6) (81.2)
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
 0.5

0.5
(4.9) 3.9
 1.2
Foreign source income subject to United States tax1.4
 0.8
 0.3
Research and development credit(0.7) (0.1)
(2.1)(0.7) (0.7) (1.2)
U.S. tax reform214.6
 
 
Incentive stock option compensation and non-deductible employee compensation0.4
 0.4

0.4
(11.1) (12.9) 0.5
Tax accrual adjustment3.8
 3.8

2.9
10.1
 5.0
 (5.0)
Other, net2.6
 1.0

1.1
4.0
 2.5
 2.9
Actual provision for income taxes$10.3

$24.7

$15.4
$192.0
 $21.1
 $20.7
     
 
The Company recognized tax expense of $214.6 million related to the U.S. tax reform comprised of the following: (i) a one-time transition tax of $185.7 million on the Company’s accumulated foreign earnings, which the Company has elected to pay over eight years, (ii) $20.0 million related to the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred taxes at the revised U.S. statutory rates and (iii) $8.9 million of other deferred taxes on foreign distributable earnings, primarily related to withholding taxes and state tax impact.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred tax assets and liabilities are:
October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014
Deferred tax assets:
 
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowances for doubtful accounts$1.3

$1.4
Inventories4.9

4.4
Litigation settlements0.2

0.1
Accrued liabilities, reserves and compensation accruals43.1

38.1
Restricted stock26.4
 24.7
Net operating loss carryforwards2.8
 6.2
Plant and equipment4.4
 5.7
Research and experimental expenses - Section 59(e)2.6
 3.8
Tax credit carryforwards1.1
 11.7
Total gross deferred tax assets86.8
 96.1
Less valuation allowance(13.4) (14.5)
Deferred tax assets73.4
 81.6
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
Tax deductible goodwill(26.5) (24.2)
Transaction cost(1.1) (1.1)
Foreign deferred tax liabilities(6.6) (42.0)
Other intangible assets(24.0) (27.9)
Bonus adjustments under new accounting method
 
Total gross deferred tax liabilities(58.2) (95.2)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$15.2

$(13.6)

Current deferred tax liabilities of $4 thousand at October 31, 2015, and $20 thousand at October 31, 2014, are included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet.

92


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)              
2018 2017
Deferred tax assets:
 
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowances for doubtful accounts$4.0
 $5.4
Inventories3.8
 6.1
Litigation settlements0.2
 0.8
Accrued liabilities, reserves and compensation accruals38.8
 50.4
Foreign deferred tax assets(1)
51.8
 65.0
Restricted stock and stock option expenses25.6
 39.7
Net operating loss carryforwards6.7
 3.7
Intangible assets3.1
 
Research and experimental expenses - Section 59(e)2.5
 5.1
Tax credit carryforwards1.3
 8.7
Total gross deferred tax assets137.8
 184.9
Less valuation allowance(39.1) (59.1)
Deferred tax assets98.7
 125.8
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
Tax deductible goodwill(22.4) (32.4)
Plant and equipment(8.2) (4.8)
Deferred tax on foreign earnings(8.9) 
Transaction costs(0.5) (1.1)
Foreign deferred tax liabilities(1)
(31.3) (40.1)
Other intangible assets
 (25.9)
Total gross deferred tax liabilities(71.3) (104.3)
Net deferred tax assets$27.4
 $21.5

(1)A reclassification between Foreign deferred tax assets and Foreign deferred tax liabilities was made to the 2017 balances.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, we believe it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance at October 31, 2015.2018. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced. During the year ended October 31, 2012, we recorded in purchase accounting deferred tax assets in connection with our acquisition of Origio a/s and subsidiaries. A valuation allowance of $1.1 million was recorded in the process for Origio's capital loss arising from a building write-down expense related to the former headquarters location in Jyllig, Denmark. During the fiscal third quarter of 2013, we revalued the deferred tax assets and liabilities residing in Denmark, along with the related valuation allowance, to reflect the newly enacted tax rate change that incrementally decreased the corporate tax rate. As a result, the valuation allowance was reduced to $1.0 million.
For the year ended October 31, 2014, we recorded in purchase accounting deferred tax assets in connection with its acquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., and subsidiaries. A valuation allowance of $13.5 million was set up against Sauflon Hungary's development tax credits.

A valuation allowance of $13.4$39.1 million and $14.5$59.1 million was recorded against itsour gross deferred tax asset balance as of October 31, 2015,2018, and October 31, 2014,2017, respectively. There was a $16.5 million decrease related to reversing the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets for Puerto Rico research credits that have or will be sold. The remaining reduction relates to recognizing benefits to income tax expense to utilize California net operating losses and Hungarian tax credits.

We have not provided for federal income tax on approximately $1.8 billion of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries since we intend

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to reinvest this amount outside the United States indefinitely.Consolidated Financial Statements


At October 31, 2015,2018, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $10.1 million and state net operating loss carryforwards of $40.1 million. We also had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $3.2 million related to share option exercises as of October 31, 2015. A tax benefit and a credit to additional paid-in capital for the excess deduction would not be recognized until such deduction reduces taxes payable.$53.6 million. Additionally, we had $6.7$1.7 million of federal alternative minimum tax credits, $5.4 million of federal research credits and $1.1 million of California research credits. The federal net operating loss and federal research credits carryforwards expire on various dates between 2026 through 2035, and the federal alternative minimum tax credits carry forward indefinitely. The state net operating loss carryforwards expire on various dates between 20192020 through 2035,2038, and the California research credits carry forward indefinitely.indefinitely. The net operating loss and other tax credits may be subject to certain limitations upon utilization under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.



93


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


The aggregated changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits (“UTB”) were as follows: 
(In millions)

Balance at October 31, 2013$26.4
Balance at October 31, 2016$39.9
Increase from prior year's UTB's2.5
12.9
Increase from current year's UTB's6.0
9.9
UTB (decrease) from expiration of statute of limitations(3.5)(2.8)
Balance at October 31, 201431.4
Balance at October 31, 201759.9
Increase from prior year's UTB's
4.2
Increase from current year's UTB's18.7
9.4
UTB (decrease) from expiration of statute of limitations(9.8)(4.6)
Balance at October 31, 2015$40.3
Balance at October 31, 2018$68.9
 
As of October 31, 2015,2018, 2017, and 2016 we had unrecognized tax benefits of $29.4$68.9 million, including $3.7$59.9 million, of related accrued interest and penalties that, if$39.9 million, respectively. If recognized, these tax benefits would affect our effective tax rate.rates for 2018, 2017, and 2016, by $46.6 million, $38.1 million, and $24.8 million, respectively. It is our policy to recognize interest and penalties directly related to incomes taxestax as additional income tax expense. As of October 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, we had accrued gross interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions of $4.4 million, $3.6 million, and $3.7 million, respectively.
 
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at October 31, 2015,2018, is $3.0$26 million related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits related to expiring statutes in various jurisdictions worldwide and is comprised of transfer pricing and other items.

We are required to file income tax returns in the United StatesU.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and local jurisdictions, and many foreign jurisdictions. As of October 31, 2015,2018, the tax years for which we remain subject to United StatesU.S. federal income tax assessment upon examination are 20122015 through 2014,2017, as well as other major tax jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, Japan and France. We remain subject to income tax examinations in Australia for the tax years 20112014 through 2014.2017. The Company is currently under audit in the U.S. and the U.K. for 2015 and 2016. These audits are in the early stages and the tax authorities are issuing requests for information.

94


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




Note 7.6. Earnings Per Share
Years Ended October 31,      
(In millions, except per share amounts)2015 2014 2013
(In millions, except for earnings per share)2018 2017 2016
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders$203.5
 $269.9
 $296.2
$139.9
 $372.9
 $273.9
Basic:          
Weighted average common shares48.5
 48.1
 48.6
49.1
 48.9
 48.5
Basic earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders$4.20
 $5.61
 $6.09
$2.85
 $7.63
 $5.65
Diluted:          
Weighted average common shares48.5
 48.1
 48.6
49.1
 48.9
 48.5
Effect of dilutive stock options0.7
 0.9
 1.1
0.6
 0.7
 0.5
Diluted weighted average common shares49.2
 49.0
 49.7
49.7
 49.6
 49.0
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders$4.14
 $5.51
 $5.96
$2.81
 $7.52
 $5.59
The following table sets forth stock options to purchase our common stock and restricted stock units that were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because their effect would have been antidilutive for the periods presented:
Years Ended October 31,      
(In thousands, except exercise prices)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Stock option shares excluded123
 138
 
257
 90
 392
Range of exercise prices$162.28
 $119.89
 
$226.30-$230.09
 $175.31
 $131.60-$162.69
Restricted stock units excluded1
 1
 
21
 3
 2

95


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 8.7. Stockholders’ Equity

Analysis of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
(In millions)Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities Change in Value of Derivative Instruments Minimum Pension Liability TotalForeign Currency Translation Adjustment Minimum Pension Liability Total
Balance at October 31, 2012$(7.2) $
 $(2.4) $(21.7) $(31.3)
Balance at October 31, 2015$(171.8) $(19.8) $(191.6)
Gross change in value for the period2.6
 
  (0.7) 19.0
 20.9
(289.6) (13.7) (303.3)
Reclassification adjustments for (gain) loss realized in income
 (0.1)  2.9
 
 2.8
Tax effect for the period
 0.1
  (0.9) (7.4) (8.2)
 5.3
 5.3
Balance at October 31, 2013$(4.6) $
  $(1.1) $(10.1) $(15.8)
Balance at October 31, 2016$(461.4) $(28.2) $(489.6)
Gross change in value for the period$(87.8) $
  $(0.1) $(5.9) $(93.8)$107.7
 $10.8
 $118.5
Reclassification adjustments for loss realized in income
 
  1.7
 
 1.7
Tax effect for the period
 
  (0.6) 2.3
 1.7

 (4.2) (4.2)
Balance at October 31, 2014$(92.4) $
  $(0.1) $(13.7) $(106.2)
Balance at October 31, 2017$(353.7) $(21.6) $(375.3)
Gross change in value for the period$(79.4) $
 $
 $(10.0) $(89.4)$(58.5) $11.0
 $(47.5)
Reclassification adjustments for loss realized in income
 
 0.1
 
 0.1
Tax effect for the period
 
 
 3.9
 3.9

 (3.1) (3.1)
Balance at October 31, 2015$(171.8) $
  $
 $(19.8) $(191.6)
ASU 2018-02 adoption(1)

 (4.8) (4.8)
Balance at October 31, 2018$(412.2) $(18.5) $(430.7)
(1)
Represents reclassification to retained earnings from adoption of ASU 2018-02. See Note 1. Accounting Policies for additional information.
Share Repurchases
In December 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the 2012 Share Repurchase Program and subsequently amendedthrough subsequent amendments, the most recent in March 2017, the total repurchase authorization towas increased from $500.0 million to $1.0 billion of the Company's common stock. With the amendment, thisThe program has no expiration date and may be discontinued at any time. Purchases under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program are subject to a review of the circumstances in place at the time and may be made from time to time as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015,2018, we did not repurchase any shares under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, we repurchased 468258 thousand shares of our common stock for $67.3 million and approximately $118.4$55.0 million. At October 31, 2018, $563.5 million remained authorized for repurchase under the program. During the three months ended October 31, 2015, we repurchased 368 thousand shares of our common stock for $51.3 million at an average purchase price of $139.60 per share. For the three months ended January 31, 2015, we repurchased 100 thousand shares of our common stock for $16.0 million at an average purchase price of $159.96 per share. We did not repurchase shares during the three-month periods ended July 31, 2015 and April 30, 2015.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, we repurchased 572 thousand shares of our common stock for $75.8 million. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, we repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $167.3 million.
Cash Dividends
In fiscal 20152018 and 2014,2017, we paid semiannual dividends of 3 cents per share: an aggregate of $1.4$1.5 million or 3 cents per share on February 9, 2015,2018 to stockholders of record on January 23, 2015; $1.52018; $1.5 million or 3 cents per share on August 6, 2015,7, 2018 to stockholders of record on July 24, 2015; $1.423, 2018; $1.5 million or 3 cents per share on February 9, 2017, to stockholders of record on January 23, 2017; and $1.5 million or 3 cents per share on August 7, 2017, to stockholders of record on July 21, 2017.

96


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


on February 7, 2014, to stockholders of record on January 24, 2014; $1.5 million or 3 cents per share on August 6, 2014, to stockholders of record on July 24, 2014.

Stockholders' Rights Plan
Under ourOur stockholders' rights plan, where each outstanding share of our common stock carries carried one-half of one preferred share purchase right (Right). The Rights will become exercisable only under certain circumstances involving acquisition of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common stock by a person or group (Acquiring Person) without the prior consent of Cooper's Board of Directors. If a person or group becomes an Acquiring Person, each Right would then entitle the holder (other than an Acquiring Person) to purchase, for the then purchase price of the Right (currently $450, subject to adjustment), shares of Cooper's common stock, or shares of common stock of any person into which we are thereafter merged or to which 50% or more of our assets or earning power is sold, with a market value of twice the purchase price. The Rights will expire inexpired on October 2017 unless earlier exercised or redeemed. The Board of Directors may redeem the Rights for $0.01 per Right prior to any person or group becoming an Acquiring Person.29, 2017.

Note 9.8. Stock Plans

At October 31, 2015,2018, Cooper had the following share-based compensation plans:
 
2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors (2006 Directors Plan)
 
In March 2006, we received stockholder approval of the 2006 Directors Plan, and it was amended by the Board of Directors in March 2007, October 2007, October 2008 and December 2008. We received stockholder approval of an amendment and restatement of thePlan. The 2006 Directors Plan was subsequently amended and restated, and approved by stockholders, in March 2009 and theagain in March 2011. The Board of Directors amended the Amended and Restated 2006 Directors Plan in October 2009 and October 2010. We received stockholder approval of a further amendment and restatement of the 2006 Directors Plan in March 2011 and the Board of Directors amended the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Directors Plan in October 2011, October 2012, October 2013 and October 2013.2016.
 
The Second Amended and Restated 2006 Directors Plan, as amended, authorizes either Cooper's Board of Directors or a designated committee thereof composed of two or more Non-Employee Directors to grant to Non-Employee Directors during the period ending March 21, 2019,, equity awards for up to 950,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for future stock splits, stock dividends, expirations, forfeitures and similar events.
 
As amended, the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Directors Plan provides for annual equity award grants of stock options and restricted stock to Non-Employee Directors on November 1 and November 15, respectively, of each fiscal year. Specifically, each Non-Employee Directoryear which subsequently vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Grants may be awarded on each November 15in the right to purchase for $0.10 per share, a numberform of shares ofstock options, restricted stock, withrestricted stock units (RSUs), or a combination of award types. Awards will have a total grant value of $135,000$270,000, or $148,500$285,500 in the case of the Non-ExecutiveLead Director and $297,000 in the case of the Chairman of the BoardBoard.

Under the 2006 Directors Plan, grants of stock options will have an exercise price equal to 100% of fair market value on the date of grant. Thegrant and shall expire no more than 10 years after the grant date. Awards of restricted stock provide the right to purchase shares for $0.10 per share, subject to restrictions on the restricted stock willsale or transfer which lapse on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Each Non-Employee Director may also be awarded on each November 1, a grantgrant. Restricted shares retain dividend and voting rights. RSUs entitle the recipient to receive shares of options to purchase common stock, with an approximate accounting value of $135,000,without any payment in cash or in the caseproperty. Legal ownership of the Lead Director and/shares is not transferred until the unit vests and RSUs have no dividend or any non-executive Chairman of the Board, as the case may be, of $148,500. These options vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Options expire no more than 10 years after the grant date. In December 2008, the 2006 Directors' Plan was also amendedvoting rights prior to allow discretionary granting of stock options and/or restricted stock with similar terms to the annual grant other than the specific share requirements. vesting.

As of October 31, 2015, 185,7752018, 130,494 shares remained available under the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Directors' Plan for future grants. 

97


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2007 LTIP)
 
In March 2007, we received stockholder approval of the 2007 LTIP. The 2007 LTIP was subsequently amended and restated, and granted stockholder approval in October 2007, the Board of Directors amended the 2007 LTIP. In March 2009, we received stockholder approval of an amendment and restatement of the 2007 LTIP and in March 2011, we received stockholder approval of a further amendment and restatement of the 2007 LTIP.March 2016.
 
The SecondThird Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP is designed to increase our stockholder value by attracting, retaining and motivating key employees and consultants who directly influence our profitability. The SecondThird Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP authorizes either our Board of Directors, or a designated committee thereof composed of two or more Non-Employee Directors, to grant to eligible individuals during the period ending December 31, 2017,2026, up to 5,230,0006,930,000 shares in the form of specified equity awards including stock option, restricted stock unit and performance share awards, subject to adjustment for future stock splits, stock dividends, expirations, forfeitures and similar events.

During fiscal 2015,2018, we granted stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share awards to employees under the SecondThird Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP. All equity awardsstock options are granted at 100% of fair market value on the date of grant and stock options expire no more than 10 years after the grant date. Stock options may become exercisable based on our common stock achieving certain price targets, specified time periods elapsing or other criteria designated by the Board of Directors or its authorized committee at their discretion. RSUs are nontransferable awards entitling the recipient to receive shares of common stock, without any payment in cash or property, in one or more installments at a future date or dates as determined by the Board of Directors or its authorized committee. For RSUs, legal ownership of the shares is not transferred to the employee until the unit vests, which is generally over a specified time period.period and RSUs have no dividend or voting rights prior to vesting. Performance share awards are nontransferable awards entitling the recipient to receive a variable number of shares of common stock, without any payment in cash or property, in one or more installments at a future date or dates as determined by the Board of Directors or its authorized committee. Legal ownership of the shares is not transferred to the recipient until the award vests, and the number of shares distributed is dependent upon the achievement of certain performance targets over a specified period of time.

As of October 31, 2015, 757,7472018, 1,441,896 shares remained available under the SecondThird Amended and Restated 2007 LTIP for future grants. The amount of available shares includes shares which may be distributed under performance share awards.

Share-Based Compensation
The compensation cost and related tax benefit recognized in our consolidated financial statements for share-based awards were as follows:
October 31,      
(In millions)2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Selling, general and administrative expense$29.2
 $32.4
 $25.3
$37.6
 $33.1
 $26.2
Cost of sales2.8
 2.2
 1.9
3.6
 2.8
 2.6
Research and development expense0.9
 1.9
 1.3
2.0
 1.3
 1.1
Total compensation expense$32.9
 $36.5
 $28.5
$43.2
 $37.2
 $29.9
Related income tax benefit$10.2
 $11.7
 $8.8
$8.8
 $11.4
 $9.0

We capitalized share-based compensation expense as part of the cost of inventory in the amounts of $2.8 million, $2.2 million, $1.9 million during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net (payments) proceeds related to share-based compensation awards for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $(4.8) million, $8.6 million and $19.3 million, respectively.

98


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Details regarding the valuation and accounting for share-based awards follow.

Stock Options
 
The fair value of each stock option award granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and assumptions noted in the following table. The expected life of the awards is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting forfeiture and/or exercise. Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. In determining the expected volatility, management considers implied volatility from publicly-traded options on our common stock at the date of grant, historical volatility and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the continuous rates provided by the United States Treasury with a term equal to the expected life of the option. The dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share, divided by the stock price at the date of grant.

Years Ended October 31,2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Expected life4.8 - 5.5 years
  4.8 - 5.5 years
  4.7 - 5.5 years
5.4 years
   5.5 years
  4.8 - 5.5 years
Expected volatility29.0% - 29.5%
  31.5% - 35.3%
  34.8% - 35.9%
23.0%  24.5% 
  27.6% - 27.7%
Risk-free interest rate1.3% - 1.5%
  1.4% - 1.6%
  0.6% - 0.8%
2.0%  1.2%  1.3% - 1.5%
Dividend yield0.04%  0.05%  0.06%0.03%  0.03%  0.04%

The activity and status of our stock option plans are summarized below:
Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at October 31, 20141,323,936
 $63.32
    
Outstanding at October 31, 20171,064,466
 $129.33
    
Granted143,434
 $162.34
    256,639
 $229.49
    
Exercised367,553
 $52.20
    234,107
 $95.26
    
Forfeited or expired9,286
 $91.67
    
 $
    
Outstanding at October 31, 20151,090,531
 $79.85
  5.80  
Vested and exercisable at October 31, 2015693,968
 $55.21
  4.59 $67,417,316
Outstanding at October 31, 20181,086,998
 $160.31
  7.17  
Vested and expected to vest at October 31, 20181,055,266
 $159.19
 7.13 $104,596,614
Vested and exercisable at October 31, 2018379,113
 $127.11
  5.71 $49,741,332

The weighted-average fair value of each option granted during fiscal 2015,2018, estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, for the 2007 LTIP was $48.70. $57.86. No options were granted under the 2006 Directors Plan in fiscal 2018. The expected requisite service period for options granted to employees in fiscal 2018 ranged from approximately 35 months to 60 months. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018 was $35.0 million.

The weighted-average fair value of each option granted during fiscal 2014,2017, estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, for the 2007 LTIP was $41.73. For$44.00. No options were granted under the 2006 Directors Plan the weighted-average fair values of options granted for fiscal 2015 and 2014 were $48.53 and $44.20, respectively. The expected requisite service period for options granted to employees in fiscal 2015 was 60 months. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended October 31, 2015 was $45.7 million.2017.
 
Stock awards outstanding under our current plans have been granted at prices which are either equal to or above the market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options granted under the 2007 LTIP generally vest over foura range of three to five years based on market and service conditions and expire no later than ten years after the grant date. Options granted under the 2006 Directors Plan generally vest in one year or upon achievement of a market condition and expire no later than ten years after the grant date. We generally recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. Directors' options and restricted stock grants

99


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


areover the vesting period. However, Directors' options grants would have been expensed on the date of grant as the 2006 Directors Plan doesdid not contain a substantive future requisite service period. As of October 31, 2015,2018, there was $5.0$14.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.93.2 years.

Restricted Stock Units
 
RSUs granted under the 2007 LTIP have been granted at prices which are either equal to or above the market value of the stock on the date of grant and generally vest over fourthree to five years. The fair value of restricted stock units is estimated on the date of grant based on the market price of our common stock. We recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. As of October 31, 2015,2018, there was $48.8$63.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vestednonvested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 3.43.2 years.
 
The status of our non-vested RSUs is summarized below:
Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date Fair
Value Per Share
Non-vested RSUs at October 31, 2014598,667
 $93.09
Non-vested RSUs at October 31, 2017533,852
 $149.93
Granted169,820
 $162.54
162,121
 $230.06
Vested and issued229,349
 $78.73
184,121
 $139.07
Forfeited or expired22,932
 $101.16
24,538
 $169.71
Non-vested RSUs at October 31, 2015516,206
 $121.96
Non-vested RSUs at October 31, 2018487,314
 $179.70

Performance Units
 
Performance units are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting future reported earnings per share goals over a defined performance cycle, usually three years.years. Performance units, if earned, may be paid in cash or shares of common stock. The performance shares actually earned will range from zero to 150% of the target number of performance shares for performance periods ending in fiscal 20152018 through fiscal 2017.2020. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the performance share plan, any shares earned will be distributed in the subsequent fiscal year after the performance period. The fair value of performance unit awards is estimated on the date of grant based on the current market price of our common stock and the estimate of probability of award achievement. This estimate is reviewed each fiscal quarter and adjustments are recorded if it is determined that the estimate of probability of award achievement has changed.
 
We recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. As of October 31, 2015,2018, there was $8.4$1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance units, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.71.6 years.
 
Performance units granted on December 12, 2012 vestedJanuary 29, 2016 completed their performance period on October 31, 20152018 and met 50%100% of the target and, subject to the provisions of the plan, we expect to grant a similar performance award in our fiscal first quarter of 2016.target. We also granted performance unit awards on February 1, 2017 and December 11, 2013 and February 2, 201512, 2017 with specific performance goals for each period ending on October 31, 20162019 and October 31, 2017,2020, respectively.

100


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 10.9. Employee Benefits

Cooper's Retirement Income Plan
 
Cooper's Retirement Income Plan (Plan), a defined benefit plan, covers substantially all full-time United States employees. Cooper's contributions are designed to fund normal cost on a current basis and to fund the estimated prior service cost of benefit improvements. The unit credit actuarial cost method is used to determine the annual cost. Cooper pays the entire cost of the Plan and funds such costs as they accrue. Virtually all of the assets of the Plan are comprised of equities and participation in equity and fixed income funds.

We use individual spot rates along the yield curve that correspond with the timing of each benefit payment to determine the service and interest costs of components of our net periodic benefit cost utilizing the correlation of projected cash outflows and corresponding spot rates on the yield curve.
The following table sets forth the Plan's benefit obligations and fair value of the Plan assets at October 31, 2015,2018, 2017 and 2016 and the funded status of the Plan and net periodic pension costs for each of the years in the three-year periodperiods ended October 31, 2015.2018.
 
Retirement Income Plan
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Change in benefit obligation
 
 

 
 
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$101.1
 $84.2
 $88.6
$151.7
 $138.9
 $117.3
Service cost8.8
 7.1
 7.4
10.7
 10.2
 8.9
Interest cost4.6
 4.0
 3.3
5.0
 4.4
 4.3
Benefits paid(4.7) (1.8) (3.5)(3.7) (2.6) (2.3)
Actuarial loss (gain)7.5
 7.6
 (11.6)
Actuarial (gain) loss(16.6) 0.8
 10.7
Benefit obligation, end of year$117.3
 $101.1
 $84.2
$147.1
 $151.7
 $138.9
Change in plan assets
 
 

 
 
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year$72.2
 $59.3
 $47.4
$112.8
 $89.2
 $79.5
Actual return on plan assets2.0
 5.9
 9.2
1.9
 16.2
 2.0
Employer contributions10.0
 8.8
 6.2
10.0
 10.0
 10.0
Benefits paid(4.7) (1.8) (3.5)(3.7) (2.6) (2.3)
Fair value of plan assets, end of year$79.5
 $72.2
 $59.3
$121.0
 $112.8
 $89.2
Funded status at end of year$(37.8) $(28.9) $(24.9)$(26.1) $(38.9) $(49.7)

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:
 
 

 
 
Noncurrent asset$

$

$
$

$

$
Current liability









Noncurrent liabilities(37.8)
(28.9)
(24.9)(26.1)
(38.9)
(49.7)
Net amount recognized at year end$(37.8)
$(28.9)
$(24.9)$(26.1)
$(38.9)
$(49.7)


101


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
 
 

 
 
Net transition obligation$

$

$
Prior service cost









Net loss32.1

22.1

16.0
24.0

34.9

45.8
Accumulated other comprehensive income$32.1

$22.1

$16.0
$24.0

$34.9

$45.8

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
 
 
Information for pension plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets
 
 
Projected benefit obligation$117.3
 $101.1
 $84.2
$147.1
 $151.7
 $138.9
Accumulated benefit obligation$102.6
 $88.6
 $73.6
Fair value of plan assets$79.5
 $72.2
 $59.3
$121.0
 $112.8
 $89.2

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)                  
2015 2014 2013
Reconciliation of prepaid (accrued) pension cost     
Accrued pension cost at prior fiscal year end$(6.8)
$(8.9)
$(6.2)
Net periodic benefit cost8.9

6.7

8.9
Contributions made during the year10.0

8.8

6.2
Accrued pension cost at fiscal year end$(5.7)
$(6.8)
$(8.9)
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)                  
2018 2017 2016
Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets     
Accumulated benefit obligation$130.5
 $133.3
 $121.2
Fair value of plan assets$121.0
 $112.8
 $89.2

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)                  
2015 2014 2013
Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income     
Net periodic benefit cost:     
   Service cost$8.8

$7.1

$7.4
   Interest cost4.6

4.0

3.3
   Expected return on plan assets(6.0)
(5.0)
(3.9)
   Amortization of transitional (asset) or obligation




   Amortization of prior service cost




   Recognized actuarial loss1.5

0.6

2.1
   Net periodic pension cost$8.9

$6.7

$8.9
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)                  
2018 2017 2016
Reconciliation of accrued pension cost
 
 
Accrued pension cost at prior fiscal year end$4.0

$4.0

$5.7
Net periodic benefit cost8.2

10.0

8.3
Contributions made during the year(10.0)
(10.0)
(10.0)
Accrued pension cost at fiscal year end$2.2

$4.0

$4.0


102

Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)                  
2018 2017 2016
Components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in the fiscal year
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost:
 
 
Service cost$10.7

$10.2

$8.9
Interest cost5.0

4.4

4.3
Expected return on plan assets(9.2)
(7.3)
(6.6)
Recognized actuarial loss1.7

2.7

1.7
Net periodic pension cost$8.2

$10.0

$8.3


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2015 2014 2013
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income     
Net transition obligation$

$

$
Prior service cost




Net loss (gain)11.5

6.7

(16.8)
Amortizations of net transition obligation




Amortizations of prior service cost




Amortizations of net gain(1.5)
(0.6)
(2.2)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income$10.0

$6.1

$(19.0)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$18.9

$12.8

$(10.1)

There is no estimated net transition obligation or prior service cost, but $1.7 million of estimated net loss for the plan will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year.
Years Ended October 31,
(In millions)
2018 2017 2016
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income

 

 

Net (gain) loss(9.3)
(8.1)
15.4
Amortizations of net (gain)(1.7)
(2.7)
(1.7)
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income)$(11.0)
$(10.8)
$13.7
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income)$(2.8)
$(0.8)
$22.0

Years Ended October 31,2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net periodic pension cost and projected benefit obligation at year end:
 
 

 
 
Discount rate for determining net periodic pension cost4.25% 4.75% 3.75%
Discount rate for determining net periodic pension cost:     
Projected Benefit Obligation3.75% 3.74% 4.25%
Service Cost3.85% 3.90% 4.42%
Interest Cost3.39% 3.23% 3.70%
Discount rate for determining benefit obligations at year end4.25% 4.25% 4.75%4.42%
3.75%
3.74%
Rate of compensation increase for determining expense4.00% 4.00% 4.00%4.00%
4.00%
4.00%
Rate of compensation increase for determining benefit obligations at year end4.00% 4.00% 4.00%4.00%
4.00%
4.00%
Expected rate of return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost8.00% 8.00% 8.00%8.00%
8.00%
8.00%
Expected rate of return on plan assets at year end8.00% 8.00% 8.00%8.00%
8.00%
8.00%
Measurement date for determining assets and benefit obligations at year end10/31/2015
 10/31/2014
 10/31/2013
10/31/2018

10/31/2017

10/31/2016

The discount rate enables us to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. The discount rate used for the plan is based primarily on the yields of a universe of high quality corporate bonds or the spot rate of high quality AA-rated corporate bonds, with durations corresponding to the expected durations of the benefit obligations. A change in the discount rate will cause the present value of benefit obligations to change in the opposite direction. If a discount rate of 4.75%3.75%, which is the same assimilar to prior fiscal 2013,year, had been used, the projected benefit obligation would have been $107.5$165.6 million,, and the accumulated benefit obligation would have been $94.6 million.$145.7 million.

The expected rate of return on plan assets was determined based on a review of historical returns, both for this plan and for medium- to large-sized defined benefit pension funds with similar asset allocations. This review generated separate expected returns for each asset class listed below. These expected future returns were then blended based on this Plan's target asset allocation.

Reasons for Significant Liability Gains and Losses
The projected benefit obligation experienced a net gain of approximately $16.6 million during the year. This gain is the result of assumption changes resulting in a gain of approximately $19.0 million, partially offset by losses of approximately $2.4 million due to demographic experience. The key assumption changes were the increase in the discount rate (gain of $18.4 million) and the change in mortality improvement scale (gain of $0.6 million). The primary reasons for demographic losses were salary increases higher than expected and an increase in the number of participants.

103


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Plan Assets
 
Weighted-average asset allocations at year end, by asset category are as follows:
Years Ended October 31,2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Asset category
 
 

 
 
Cash and cash equivalents2.2% 3.0% 5.3%2.1% 0.9% 4.9%
Corporate common stock9.0% 9.0% 14.6%14.5% 12.2% 8.9%
Equity mutual funds52.0% 52.1% 47.5%47.4% 49.9% 47.2%
Real estate funds3.3% 4.1% 3.8%2.7% 2.9% 4.3%
Bond mutual funds33.5% 31.8% 28.8%33.3% 34.1% 34.7%
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

The Plan invests in a diversified portfolio of assets intended to minimize risk of poor returns while maximizing expected portfolio returns. To achieve the long-term rate of return, plan assets will be invested in a mixture of instruments, including but not limited to, corporate common stock (may include the Company's stock), investment grade bond funds, cash, balanced funds, real estate funds, small or large cap equity funds and international equity funds. The allocation of assets will be determined by the investment manager, and will typically include 50% to 80%70% equities with the remainder invested in fixed income, real estate, alternatives and cash. Presently, this diversified portfolio is expected to return roughly 8.0%8% in the long run. Effective November 1, 2012, the expected rate of return on assets was reduced from 8.5% to 8.0%.

Fair Value Measurement of Plan Assets
(In millions)Total Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Asset category
 
 
 

 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents$1.7

$1.7

$

$
$2.5

$2.5

$

$
Corporate common stock7.2

7.2




17.6

17.6




Equity mutual funds41.3

41.3




57.3

57.3




Real estate funds2.6

2.6




3.3

3.3




Bond mutual funds26.7

26.7




40.3

40.3




Total$79.5

$79.5

$

$
$121.0

$121.0

$

$

The Plan has an established process for determining the fair value of plan assets. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, as Level 1 inputs, where available. For our investments in equity and bond mutual funds, and real estate funds, fair value is based on observable, Level 1 inputs, as price quotes are available and the fair values of these funds were not impacted by liquidity restrictions or the fund status. Level 2 assets are those where price quotes are not readily available and the fair value would be determined based on other observable inputs. Level 3 assets are those where price quotes are not readily available and the fair value would be determined based on unobservable inputs.
 
While we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
 



104


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Plan Cash Flows
 
Contributions
 
The Company contributions to the pension plan were $10.0$10.0 million, $8.8 million for each of the fiscal years 2018, 2017 and $6.2 million for fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.2016. We closely monitor the funded status of the Plan with respect to legislative and accounting rules. We expect to make contributions of about $10.0$10.0 million during fiscal 2016.2019.
 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
Years
(In millions)
 
2016$2.6
2017$3.0
2018$3.3
2019$3.8
2020$4.3
2021-2025$29.5
Years
(In millions)
 
2019$3.7
2020$4.2
2021$4.7
2022$5.3
2023$6.0
2024-2028$40.0

 Cooper's 401(k) Savings Plan
 
Cooper's 401(k) savings plan provides for the deferral of compensation as described in the Internal Revenue Code and is available to substantially all United States employees. Employees who participate in the 401(k) plan may elect to have up to 75% of their pre-tax salary or wages deferred and contributed to the trust established under the plan. Cooper's contributions on account of participating employees, were $4.2$5.9 million, $4.0$5.2 million and $3.4$4.4 million for the years ended October 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

International Pension Plans

For our employees outside the United States, we also participate in country-specific defined contribution plans and government-sponsored retirement plans. The defined contribution plans are administered by third-party trustees and we are not directly responsible for providing benefits to participants of government-sponsored plans. The Company’s contributions to such plans are not significant individually or in the aggregate.

Note 11.10. Fair Value Measurements
As of October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, lines of credit, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments and the ability to obtain financing on similar terms.
Assets and liabilities are measured and reported at fair value per related accountingAccounting standards that define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. An asset’s or liability’s level is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are valued and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the valuation hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

105


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
We believe that the balances of our revolving debt and term loans approximated their fair values as of October 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014 and are categorized as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
We have derivative assets and liabilities that may include interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. The impact of the counterparty’s creditworthiness when in an asset position and Cooper's creditworthiness when in a liability position has also been factored into the fair value measurement of the derivative instruments. Both the counterparty and Cooper are expected to continue to perform under the contractual terms of the instruments.
We may use interest rate swaps to maintain our desired mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The swaps exchange fixed and variable rate payments without exchanging the notional principal amount of the debt. We have elected to use the income approach to value the derivatives using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, specifically Eurodollar futures contracts up to three years, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability - specifically LIBOR cash and swap rates and credit risk at commonly quoted intervals. Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.
We may use foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize, to the extent reasonable and practical, our exposure to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. We have elected to use the income approach to value the derivatives using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs for the valuations are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability - specifically LIBOR cash rates, credit risk at commonly quoted intervals, foreign exchange spot rates and forward points. Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.
The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs during the fiscal years 2015 and 2014, within the fair value hierarchy at October 31:
(In millions)2015 2014
Assets:

 
Foreign exchange contracts$1.3
 $0.6
Liabilities:

 
Interest rate swaps
 0.1
Foreign exchange contracts0.4
 3.3
 $0.4
 $3.4


106


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


At October 31, 2018 and October 31, 2017, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, lines of credit, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments and the ability to obtain financing on similar terms.

The carrying value of our revolving credit facility and term loans approximates fair value which is estimated based on current market rates (Level 2). The Company did not have any derivative assets or liabilities that may include interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps or foreign currency forward contracts as of October 31, 2018 and October 31, 2017.
Nonrecurring fair value measurements

On a nonrecurring basis, the Company uses fair value measures when analyzing asset impairment. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. In fiscal 2018, we recorded $24.4 million of impairment charge during the second fiscal quarter related to the intangible assets acquired from Recombine Inc. as the cash flows expected to be generated by this asset group over its estimated remaining life were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. Our valuation included unobservable Level 3 inputs and was based on expected sales proceeds and discounted cash flows. The fair value of these intangible assets determined at the end of the second fiscal quarter was $0.

In addition, the Company uses fair value measures when determining assets and liabilities acquired in an acquisition as described in Note 2. Acquisitions which are considered a Level 3 measurement.

Note 12.11. Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments
 
Total minimum annual rental obligations under noncancelable operating leases (substantially all real property or equipment) in force at October 31, 2015,2018, were payable as follows:
(In millions) 
2016$27.8
201724.2
201821.4
201918.9
202017.4
2021 and thereafter129.1

$238.8
(In millions)
2019$37.5
202032.5
202128.1
202224.4
202322.0
2024 and thereafter159.7

$304.2

Aggregate rental expense for both cancelable and noncancelable contracts amounted to $27.5$38.8 million, $25.6$32.2 million and $22.8$29.9 million in 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
Legal Proceedings

On or about November 11, 2014, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care (JJVC) filed an action in the district court of Dusseldorf, Germany, against CooperVision GmbH and CooperVision, Inc. (collectively “CooperVision” or “we”) for patent infringement. In the action, JJVC alleged that certain CooperVision products infringe JJVC’s European Patent No. EP 1 754 728 B1, and was seeking damages and to enjoin these products from selling in Germany. We were challenging the validity of the patent before the European Patent Office.

In July 2015, CooperVision made a one-time lump sum payment to JJVC of $17.0 million to settle our existing patent disputes. As a result of the settlement, we withdrew our opposition to the JJVC patent filed before the European Patent Office, and JJVC withdrew its complaint of infringement pending before the district court of Dusseldorf, Germany. The settlement included worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual and royalty-free cross-licenses between the parties to certain patents including the JJVC patent referenced above. The settlement also included reciprocal covenants not to sue on those patents which were not licensed with respect to each party’s current, core commercialized product offerings, including all silicone hydrogel lenses. Neither party admitted any liability as part of the settlement.

Since March 2015, over 50 putative class action complaints were filed by contact lens consumers alleging that contact lens manufacturers, in conjunction with their respective Unilateral Pricing Policy (UPP), conspired to reach agreements between each other and certain distributors and retailers regarding the prices at which certain contact lenses could be sold to consumers. The plaintiffs are seeking damages against CooperVision, Inc., other contact lens manufacturers, distributors and retailers, in various courts

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


around the United States. In June 2015, all of the class action cases were consolidated and transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. CooperVision deniesand the allegationsother defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the complaints in December 2015. In June 2016, the motion to dismiss with respect to claims brought under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act was granted, but the motion to dismiss with respect to claims brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and intendsother state laws was denied. The actions currently are in discovery. In March 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. In August 2017, CooperVision entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs, without any admission of liability, to defendsettle all claims against CooperVision. In July 2018, the actions vigorously. We areCourt approved the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, and the Company paid the $3.0 million settlement amount into an escrow account. The settlement remains subject to final Court approval at a future hearing to be set by the Court.

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and other legal matters from time to time that arise in the ordinary course of conducting business, including matters involving our products, intellectual property, supplier relationships, distributors, competitor relationships, employees and other matters. The Company does not inbelieve that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings or claims pending against it could have a position to assess whether any loss ormaterial adverse effect on ourits financial condition or results of operations. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.and reasonably estimable under ASC 450, Contingencies. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.



107


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 13.12. Business Segment Information
Cooper uses operating income, as presented in our financial reports, as the primary measure of segment profitability. We do not allocate costs from corporate functions to segment operating income. Items below operating income are not considered when measuring the profitability of a segment. We use the same accounting policies to generate segment results as we do for our consolidated results.

Total net sales include sales to customers as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income and sales between geographic areas that are priced at terms that allow for a reasonable profit for the seller. Operating income (loss) is total net sales less cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses, amortization ofand intangible assets and the loss on divestiture of Aime.impairments. Corporate operating loss is principally corporate headquarters expense. Interest expense, gain on insurance proceeds, loss on extinguishment of debt and other income and expenses are not allocated to individual segments. Neither
No customers accounted for 10% or more of our business segments relies on any one major customer.consolidated net revenue in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018. One customer, a CooperVision contact lens distributor, accounted for approximately 10% and 11% of our consolidated net revenue in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2016, respectively.
Identifiable assets are those used in continuing operations except cash and cash equivalents, which we include as corporate assets. Long-lived assets are property, plant and equipment.
The following table presents a summary of our business segment net sales:
(In millions)2015 2014 2013
CooperVision net sales by category:     
Toric lens$440.1
 $428.6
 $388.1
Multifocal lens162.1
 147.0
 121.7
Single-use sphere lens357.2
 306.6
 271.0
Non single-use sphere and other eye care products and other528.4
 510.4
 487.5
Total CooperVision net sales1,487.8
 1,392.6
 1,268.3
CooperSurgical net sales309.3
 325.2
 319.4
Total net sales$1,797.1
 $1,717.8
 $1,587.7

108


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(In millions)2018 2017 2016
CooperVision net sales by category:
 
 
Toric lens$591.4
 $526.8
 $480.2
Multifocal lens196.6
 177.2
 169.8
Single-use sphere lens520.1
 438.3
 403.1
Non single-use sphere and other573.9
 531.8
 524.1
Total CooperVision net sales1,882.0
 1,674.1
 1,577.2
CooperSurgical net sales650.8
 464.9
 389.6
Total net sales$2,532.8
 $2,139.0
 $1,966.8
Information by business segment for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2015,2018, follows:
(In millions)CooperVision CooperSurgical Corporate ConsolidatedCooperVision CooperSurgical Corporate Consolidated
2015       
2018
 
 
 
Net sales$1,487.8
 $309.3
 $

$1,797.1
$1,882.0
 $650.8
 $

$2,532.8
Operating income (loss)$229.8
 $56.1
 $(49.2)
$236.7
$479.8
 $(19.9) $(56.8)
$403.1
Other expense, net      3.1
Interest expense      18.1
      82.7
Other (income), net      (11.5)
Income before income taxes      $215.5
      $331.9
Identifiable assets$3,714.6
 $674.8
 $71.2

$4,460.6
$3,746.0
 $2,201.7
 $165.1

$6,112.8
Depreciation expense$134.0
 $5.6
 $0.3

$139.9
$120.1
 $8.1
 $0.2

$128.4
Amortization expense$36.6
 $14.9
 $

$51.5
$43.6
 $103.1
 $

$146.7
Capital expenditures$238.3
 $4.6
 $0.1

$243.0
$178.4
 $15.1
 $0.1

$193.6
2014       
2017
 
 
 
Net sales$1,392.6

$325.2

$
 $1,717.8
$1,674.1

$464.9

$
 $2,139.0
Operating income (loss)$289.0

$69.0

$(51.5) $306.5
$418.4

$58.5

$(47.8) $429.1
Interest expense      33.4
Other expense, net      2.0
      1.7
Interest expense      8.0
Income before income taxes      $296.5
      $394.0
Identifiable assets$3,699.6

$646.2

$112.5
 $4,458.3
$3,562.6

$1,107.5

$188.6
 $4,858.7
Depreciation expense$95.5

$6.5

$0.5
 $102.5
$115.0

$4.7

$0.3
 $120.0
Amortization expense$22.7

$13.0

$
 $35.7
$36.7

$31.7

$
 $68.4
Capital expenditures$233.6

$4.2

$0.3
 $238.1
$108.2

$18.9

$0.1
 $127.2
2013       
2016
 
 
 

Net sales$1,268.3
  $319.4
  $
 $1,587.7
$1,577.2
  $389.6
  $
 $1,966.8
Operating income (loss)$289.3
  $60.6
  $(44.0) $305.9
$309.8
  $60.2
  $(45.9) $324.1
Other income, net      1.4
Interest expense      9.2
      26.2
Gain on insurance proceeds      14.1
Other expense, net      2.3
Income before income taxes      $312.3
      $295.6
Identifiable assets$2,376.0
  $632.8
  $128.5
 $3,137.3
$3,382.4
  $907.1
  $189.1
 $4,478.6
Depreciation expense$88.4
  $6.3
  $0.4
 $95.1
$131.3
  $5.9
  $0.3
 $137.5
Amortization expense$16.7
  $13.5
  $
 $30.2
$40.1
  $20.7
  $
 $60.8
Capital expenditures$170.7
  $6.9
  $0.5
 $178.1
$142.8
  $9.8
  $
 $152.6


109


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Information by geographical area by country of domicile for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 20152018, follows:
 
(In millions)United
States
  Europe Rest of
World, Other
Eliminations
& Corporate
 ConsolidatedUnited
States
  Europe Rest of
World, Other
Eliminations
& Corporate
 Consolidated
2015        
2018        
Sales to unaffiliated customers$811.9

$647.3

$337.9

$1,797.1
$1,162.2

$846.5

$524.1

$2,532.8
Sales between geographic areas250.0

493.1

(743.1)

274.3

407.1

(681.4)

Net sales$1,061.9

$1,140.4

$(405.2)
$1,797.1
$1,436.5

$1,253.6

$(157.3)
$2,532.8
Operating income (loss)$30.7

$(37.6)
$243.6

$236.7
$(39.3)
$(16.8)
$459.2

$403.1
Long-lived assets$494.2

$407.9

$65.0

$967.1
$516.7

$340.7

$118.6

$976.0
2014        
Sales to unaffiliated customers$773.8
  $582.4
 $361.6
 $1,717.8
Sales between geographic areas230.6
  346.0
 (576.6) 
Net sales$1,004.4
  $928.4
 $(215.0) $1,717.8
Operating income (loss)$47.8
  $(10.3) $269.0
 $306.5
Long-lived assets$499.2
  $406.4
 $31.7
 $937.3
2013        
2017        
Sales to unaffiliated customers$742.2
  $479.1
 $366.4
 $1,587.7
$931.1
  $746.2
 $461.7
 $2,139.0
Sales between geographic areas230.4
  326.3
 (556.7) 
255.7
  440.5
 (696.2) 
Net sales$972.6
  $805.4
 $(190.3) $1,587.7
$1,186.8
  $1,186.7
 $(234.5) $2,139.0
Operating income$49.7
  $(5.4) $261.6
 $305.9
$37.8
  $1.6
 $389.7
 $429.1
Long-lived assets$427.6
  $297.2
 $15.1
 $739.9
$472.8
  $352.3
 $85.0
 $910.1
2016        
Sales to unaffiliated customers$886.5
  $681.1
 $399.2
 $1,966.8
Sales between geographic areas254.7
  464.1
 (718.8) 
Net sales$1,141.2
  $1,145.2
 $(319.6) $1,966.8
Operating income$77.7
  $6.0
 $240.4
 $324.1
Long-lived assets$464.1
  $334.4
 $79.2
 $877.7
 

110


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 14.13. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

(In millions, except per share amounts)First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter*
2015       
(In millions, except for earnings per share)First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
2018       
Net sales$590.0
 $631.3
 $660.0
 $651.5
Gross profit$370.9
 $404.5
 $426.8
 $430.0
Income before income taxes$74.8
 $54.0
 $90.4
 $112.7
Net (loss) income attributable to Cooper stockholders$(122.5) $60.9
 $100.8
 $100.6
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - basic$(2.50) $1.24
 $2.05
 $2.05
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - diluted$(2.50) $1.23
 $2.03
 $2.02
2017       
Net sales$445.2
 $434.7
 $461.7
 $455.5
$499.1
 $522.4
 $556.0
 $561.5
Gross profit$276.4
 $267.7
 $272.9
 $253.3
$312.4
 $343.9
 $356.2
 $353.4
Income before income taxes$67.5
 $67.0
 $44.6
 $36.4
$80.1
 $109.5
 $107.7
 $96.6
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders$61.2
 $60.7
 $45.0
 $36.7
$75.8
 $104.9
 $103.6
 $88.6
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - basic$1.27
 $1.25
 $0.92
 $0.76
$1.55
 $2.14
 $2.12
 $1.82
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - diluted$1.25
 $1.23
 $0.91
 $0.75
$1.53
 $2.12
 $2.09
 $1.78
2014       
Net sales$405.0
 $412.3
 $432.5
 $468.0
Gross profit$262.9
 $268.5
 $280.6
 $279.6
Income before income taxes$79.5
 $87.8
 $94.4
 $34.9
Net income attributable to Cooper stockholders$71.8
 $79.2
 $88.1
 $30.8
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - basic$1.50
 $1.65
 $1.83
 $0.64
Earnings per share attributable to Cooper stockholders - diluted$1.47
 $1.62
 $1.80
 $0.63

*Fiscal fourth quarter 2015 results include charges for integration





THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 14. Subsequent Event

$400 million Term Loan on November 1, 2018

On November 1, 2018, subsequent to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, the Company entered into a 364-day, $400.0 million, senior unsecured term loan agreement by and restructuring activities relatedamong the Company, the lenders party thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (2018 Term Loan Agreement) which matures on October 31, 2019. The Company used the funds to recent acquisitions. Fiscal fourth quarter 2014 results includepartially repay outstanding borrowings under the operating results2016 Revolving Credit Facility.

Amounts outstanding under the 2018 Term Loan Agreement will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either the alternate base rate, or the adjusted LIBO rate (each as defined in the 2018 Term Loan Agreement), plus, in the case of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals Ltd., acquiredadjusted LIBO rate loans, an applicable rate of 60 basis points.

The 2018 Term Loan Agreement contains customary restrictive covenants, as well as financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain total leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, each as defined in August 2014,the 2018 Term Loan Agreement, consistent with the 2016 Credit Agreement and the related acquisition, integration and restructuring costs. Please refer to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2017 Term Loan Agreement, as discussed in Item 7 andSee Note 2 and Note 34. Debt for additional information.




111


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company has established and currently maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In conjunction with the close of each fiscal quarter, the Company conducts a review and evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer (our Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (our Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based upon their evaluation as of October 31, 2015,2018, the end of the fiscal period covered in this report, concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f)Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements, errors or fraud.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2018, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2015.2018.

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2015,2018, as stated in their report in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


112


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

ThereOn November 1, 2017, the Company acquired PARAGARD. Management has completed the review and evaluation of its internal control procedures and the design of those control procedures related to the PARAGARD acquisition in fiscal 2018.

Except as described above, there has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2015,2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.


113


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


PART III


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the subheadings, “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers of the Company,” “Ownership of the Company“Corporate Governance - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance - TheAbout Our Board of Directors,” “Corporate Governance - Identification of Candidates,” “Corporate Governance - Corporate Governance Policies - Ethics and Business Conduct Policy,” “Corporate Governance - Board Committees - The Audit Committee” and “Report of the Audit Committee” of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held in March 20162019 (the “2016“2019 Proxy Statement”).

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the subheadings “Report of the Organization and Compensation Committee,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation Tables” and“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Director Compensation” “Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”
of the 20162019 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

See Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters - Equity Compensation Plan Information. Additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the subheadings “Securities Held by Insiders” and “Principal Securityholders” of the “Ownership of the Company” section of the 20162019 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the subheadings “Corporate Governance - Related Party Transactions,” “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance - TheAbout Our Board of Directors” of the 20162019 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to “Report of the Audit Committee” section of the 20162019 Proxy Statement.


114


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)    1. Financial Statements

The following financial statements are filed as a part of this report:

Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Statements of Income for the years ended October 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016
Balance Sheets as of October 31, 20152018 and 20142017
Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended October 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedules of the Company.

Schedule Number     Description    
Schedule II    Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(b)     Exhibits.

The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this report.

All other schedules which are included in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required here because they are not applicable.


115



Schedule II
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Three Years Ended October 31, 20152018
(In millions)Balance
Beginning
of Year
 Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 (Deductions)
Recoveries/
Other (1)
 Balance
at End
of Year
Allowance for doubtful accounts:       
Year Ended October 31, 2015$6.0
  $1.7
  $(1.7) $6.0
Year Ended October 31, 2014$5.3
  $1.7
  $(1.0) $6.0
Year Ended October 31, 2013$4.4
  $1.5
  $(0.6) $5.3
(In millions)Balance
Beginning
of Year
 Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
 
(Deductions)
Recoveries/
Other
(1)
 Balance
at End
of Year
Allowance for doubtful accounts:       
Year Ended October 31, 2018$10.8
  $11.5
  $(3.3) $19.0
Year Ended October 31, 2017$8.5
  $2.6
  $(0.3) $10.8
Year Ended October 31, 2016$6.0
  $2.5
  $
 $8.5

(1) Consists of additions representing allowances and recoveries, less deductions representing receivables written off as uncollectible.

(In millions)Balance
Beginning
of Year
 Additions (2) Reductions/ Charges (3) Balance
at End
of Year
Income tax valuation allowance:       
Year Ended October 31, 2015$14.5
  $
 $(1.1) $13.4
Year Ended October 31, 2014$1.0
  $13.5
 $
 $14.5
Year Ended October 31, 2013$1.1
  $
 $(0.1) $1.0
(In millions)Balance
Beginning
of Year
 Additions 
Reductions/ Charges (2)
 Balance
at End
of Year
Income tax valuation allowance:       
Year Ended October 31, 2018$59.1
  $2.8
 $(22.8) $39.1
Year Ended October 31, 2017$13.3
  $45.9
 $(0.1) $59.1
Year Ended October 31, 2016$13.4
  $
 $(0.1) $13.3

(2)
Reductions includes $16.5 million of valuation allowance from prior years as a result of the sale of investment in research and development credits.
(2) During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded in purchase accounting deferred tax assets in connection with its acquisition of Sauflon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., and subsidiaries. A valuation allowance of $13.5 million was set up against Sauflon Hungary's development tax credits.
(3) During the fiscal third quarter of 2013, we revalued deferred tax assets and liabilities residing in Denmark, along with the related valuation allowance to reflect the newly enacted tax rate change that incrementally decreased the corporate tax rate.


116


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
2.1
3.1
3.2
10.1(P)#
Severance Agreement entered into as of August 21, 1989, and amended August 15, 2008, by and between Robert S. Weiss and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1992
10.2#
10.3#
10.4#
10.5#
10.6#


10.7#
10.8#
10.9#
10.10#
10.11#




THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
10.12#


10.13#
10.14#
10.15#
10.16#
10.17#
10.18#
10.19#
10.20(a)
10.21(a)
10.22
10.23
10.24










THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




Exhibit NumberDescription of Document
10.25
10.26
10.27

10.28#
10.29#
10.30#


11(b)
21
23
24
Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto)

31.1
31.2
32.1*
32.2*
101The following materials from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended October 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2018 and 2017, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended October 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, (vi) related notes to consolidated financial statements and (vii) Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts



THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


(a)The agreement received confidential treatment from the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.

(b)The information required in this exhibit is provided in See Note 6. Earnings Per Share of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

#Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

* The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 that accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of The Cooper Companies, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

(P) This Exhibit has been paper filed and is not subject to Item 601 of Reg S-K for hyperlinks.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on December 18, 2015.21, 2018.

THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC.

By: /s/ ROBERT S. WEISSAlbert G. White, III
Robert S. WeissAlbert G. White, III
President & Chief Executive Officer and Director


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the dates set forth opposite their respective names.
Signature Capacity Date
/s/ ROBERT S. WEISSALBERT G. WHITE, III
 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) December 18, 201521, 2018
(Robert S. Weiss)Albert G. White, III)    
/s/ A. THOMAS BENDER Chairman of the Board December 18, 201521, 2018
(A. Thomas Bender)    
/s/ ALLAN E. RUBENSTEIN, M.D. Vice Chairman of the Board and Lead Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Allan E. Rubenstein)    
/s/ GREG W. MATZBRIAN G. ANDREWS Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer& Treasurer December 18, 201521, 2018
(Greg W. Matz)Brian G. Andrews) (Principal Financial Officer)  
/s/ TINA MALONEYAGOSTINO RICUPATI Chief Accounting Officer & Senior Vice President, and Corporate ControllerFinance & Tax December 18, 201521, 2018
(Tina Maloney)Agostino Ricupati) (Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ COLLEEN E. JAYDirectorDecember 21, 2018
(Colleen E. Jay)  
/s/ MICHAEL H. KALKSTEIN Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Michael H. Kalkstein)
/s/ WILLIAM A. KOZYDirectorDecember 21, 2018
(William A. Kozy)    
/s/ JODY S. LINDELL Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Jody S. Lindell)    
/s/ GARY S. PETERSMEYER Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Gary S. Petersmeyer)    
/s/ STEVEN ROSENBERGROBERT S. WEISS Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Steven Rosenberg)Robert S. Weiss)    
/s/ STANLEY ZINBERG, M.D. Director December 18, 201521, 2018
(Stanley Zinberg)    

117


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


EXHIBIT INDEX
Location of
Exhibit in
Exhibit        Sequential
NumberDescription of DocumentNumber System


3.1-    Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2006    
3.2-    Amended and Restated By-Laws, The Cooper Companies, Inc., dated December 14, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2010    
4.1-    Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2007, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 30, 2007    
10.1-    Severance Agreement entered into as of August 21, 1989, and amended August 15, 2008, by and between Robert S. Weiss and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1992    
10.2-        The Cooper Companies, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan, dated May 21, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007    
10.3-    Change in Control Agreement entered into as of January 3, 2007, and amended September 9, 2008, by and between Albert G. White III and the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013
10.4-    Change in Control Agreement dated as of June 8, 2007, by and between The Cooper Companies, Inc. and Daniel G. McBride, Esq., incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2014
10.5-    Change in Control Agreement dated as of June 8, 2007, by and between The Cooper Companies, Inc. and Carol R. Kaufman, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009    
10.6-    Change in Control Agreement dated as of June 1, 2010, by and between The Cooper Companies, Inc. and Gregory W. Matz    , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011

118


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Location of
Exhibit in
Exhibit        Sequential
NumberDescription of DocumentNumber System


10.7-    The Second Amended and Restated 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement filed February 2, 2011    
10.8-    Amendment No. 1 to the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Long-term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011
10.9-    Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Long-term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012
10.10 -Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated 2006 Long-term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013
10.11-    Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Pursuant to The Cooper Companies, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007    
10.12-    Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Pursuant to The Cooper Companies, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan for Non-Employee Directors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007        
10.13-    The Second Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement filed February 2, 2011    
10.14-    Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Pursuant to the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007    
10.15-    Form of UK Tax Approved Stock Option Agreement Pursuant to the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007    
10.16-    Form of Deferred Stock Agreement Pursuant to the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
10.17 -Form of Long Term Performance Share Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Cooper Companies, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2009    
10.18(a)-
License Agreement dated as of November 19, 2007, by and among CIBA Vision AG, CIBA Vision Corporate and CooperVision, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008    
10.19(a)-
Amendment No. 1 to the License Agreement dated as of November 19, 2007, by and among CIBA Vision AG, CIBA Vision Corporate and CooperVision, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2012    

119


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Location of
Exhibit in
Exhibit        Sequential
NumberDescription of DocumentNumber System

10.20-        Lease Contract dated as of November 6, 2003, by and between The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company and Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2005
10.21-    First Supplement and Amendment to Lease Contract dated as of December 30, 2003, by and between The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company and Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2005    
10.22-    Assignment of Lease Agreement dated as of June 29, 2004, by and among Ocular Sciences Puerto Rico, Inc., Ocular Sciences Cayman Islands Corporation and The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2005
10.23
-Credit Agreement Amendment, dated as of June 30, 2014, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 1, 2014
10.24
-Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2014, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed July 1, 2014
10.25
-Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2014, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed August 6, 2014
10.26
-Term Loan Amendment No. 2, dated as of August 4, 2014, among The Cooper Companies, Inc. the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed August 6, 2014
10.27-    Credit Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2011, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., CooperVision International Holding Company LP, the lenders from time to time party thereto, KeyBank National Association, as a bookrunner, a lead arranger, and sole administrative agent, swing line lender and LC issuer, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as a lead arranger, bookrunner and syndication agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as a lead arranger, bookrunner and syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A., as a lead arranger and documentation agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as lead arranger and documentation agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed March 4, 2011    
10.28 -Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2012
10.29 -Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 12, 2013, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 17, 2013

120


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Location of
Exhibit in
Exhibit        Sequential
NumberDescription of DocumentNumber System

10.30 -Term loan agreement, dated as of September 12, 2013, among The Cooper Companies, Inc., the lenders party thereto, and KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 17, 2013
10.31 -Term Loan Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 21, 2015, among The Cooper Companies, Inc. the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 4, 2015
10.32 -Term Loan Amendment No. 3, dated as of August 21, 2015, among The Cooper Companies, Inc. the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 4, 2015
10.33 -Credit Agreement Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 21, 2015, The Cooper Companies, Inc., CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto, and Keybank National Association, as administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 4, 2015
10.34 -The Cooper Companies, Inc. 2014 Incentive Payment Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 16, 2013
10.35 -The Cooper Companies, Inc. 2015 Incentive Payment Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 6, 2015
11(b)
-    Calculation of earnings per share    
21-    Subsidiaries    
23-    Consent and Report on Schedule of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm    
31.1-    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934    
31.2-    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934    
32.1-    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350    
32.2-    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350    
101-    The following materials from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2015, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2015 and 2014, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (vi) related notes to consolidated financial statements and (vii) Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
_______
(a)The agreement received confidential treatment from the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.

(b)The information required in this exhibit is provided in Note 7, Earnings Per Share, in this report.


121


THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CORPORATE INFORMATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

A. Thomas Bender
Chairman of the Board

Allan E. Rubenstein, M.D.
Vice Chairman and Lead Director,
Chairman of the Board, CalAsia
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Colleen E. Jay
Director

Michael H. Kalkstein
Of Counsel, Palo Alto Office, Dechert LLP

William A. Kozy
Director

Jody S. Lindell
President and Chief Executive Officer,
S.G. Management, Inc.

Gary S. Petersmeyer
Director

Steven RosenbergRobert S. Weiss
Director

Robert S. WeissAlbert G. White, III
President & Chief Executive Officer and Director

Stanley Zinberg, M.D.
Director

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Audit Committee
Jody S. Lindell (Chairman)
Michael H. Kalkstein
William A. Kozy
Gary Petersmeyer
Steven Rosenberg

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
Allan E. Rubenstein, M.D. (Chairman)
Michael H. Kalkstein
Steven RosenbergWilliam A. Kozy
Stanley Zinberg, M.D.
Colleen E. Jay

Organization and Compensation Committee
Michael H. Kalkstein (Chairman)
Colleen E. Jay
Jody S. Lindell
Gary S. Petersmeyer
Allan E. Rubenstein, M.D.

Science and Technology Committee
Stanley Zinberg, M.D. (Chairman)
A. Thomas Bender
Gary S. Petersmeyer
Allan E. Rubenstein, M.D.
Robert S. Weiss

 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Robert S. WeissAlbert G. White, III
President and Chief Executive Officer

Randal L. Golden
Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel

Carol R. KaufmanAgostino Ricupati
ExecutiveSenior Vice President
Secretary, Chief Administrative Officer
Finance and Tax, and Chief GovernanceAccounting Officer

Tina Maloney
Vice President and Corporate Controller

Greg W. MatzBrian G. Andrews
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer& Treasurer

Robert D. Auerbach, M.D
President of CooperSurgical, Inc.

Daniel G. McBride, Esq.
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
President of CooperVision,

Paul Remmell
President and Chief Executive Officer,
CooperSurgical, Inc.

Albert G. White III
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

CooperVision, Inc.
6150 Stoneridge Mall Road
Suite 370
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-621-2450
www.coopervision.com

CooperSurgical, Inc.
75 Corporate Drive
Trumbull, CT 06611
203-601-5200
www.coopersurgical.com

CORPORATE OFFICES

The Cooper Companies, Inc.
6140 Stoneridge Mall Road
Suite 590
Pleasanton, CA 94588
925-460-3600
www.coopercos.com

 
INVESTOR INFORMATION

Recent news releases, the annual report on Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K, information about the Company's corporate governance program, recent investor presentations, replays of quarterly conference calls and historical stock quotes are available on our Web site at www.coopercos.com.

INVESTOR RELATIONS CONTACT

Kim Duncan
Vice President of Investor Relations & Administration
6140 Stoneridge Mall Road
Suite 590
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Voice: 925-460-3663
Fax: 925-460-3648
E-mail: ir@cooperco.com

ANNUAL MEETING

The Cooper Companies will hold its Annual Stockholders' Meeting in March 2016.2019.

TRANSFER AGENT

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
800-937-5449

TRADEMARKS

The Cooper Companies, Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates own, license or distribute the registered trademarks, common law trademarks and trade names referenced in this report.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

KPMG LLP

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

The New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol “COO”