0000740260 vtr:BrookdaleSeniorLivingMember vtr:BrookdaleSanJose2428Member vtr:SeniorsHousingCommunitiesMember 2019-12-31 0000740260 vtr:AtriaMember vtr:AtriaDraperPlace8731Member vtr:SeniorsHousingCommunitiesMember 2019-12-31 0000740260 vtr:OtherThirdPartyMember vtr:OutlookPointeAtLakemont1703Member vtr:SeniorsHousingCommunitiesMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0000740260 vtr:RtsNaples2938Member vtr:MedicalOfficeBuildingsMember 2019-12-31



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)  
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 20172019
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM 
For the transition period from            toTO 
Commission File Number file number: 1-10989
 
VENTAS, INC.Ventas, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
61-1055020
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300
Chicago, Illinois
United States
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
60654(Zip Code)
Not Applicable877 483-6827
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report) 
61-1055020(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
353 N. Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
60654
(Zip Code)
(877) 483-6827
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TitleTrading symbol:Class of Each ClassCommon Stock: Name of Each Exchangeexchange on Which Registeredwhich registered:
VTRCommon Stock, $0.25 par value $0.25 per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yesx    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesx    No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx    No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer ¨
 
AcceleratedNon-accelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨    No x
The aggregate market value of shares of the Registrant’sregistrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrantregistrant on June 30, 2017,28, 2019, based on a closing price of the common stock of $69.48$68.35 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $18.8$25.1 billion. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners of the Registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of January 31, 2018,February 17, 2020, there were 356,198,053372,860,471 shares of the Registrant’sregistrant’s common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’sregistrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 15, 201819, 2020 are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS


Unless otherwise indicated or except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” and other similar terms in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to Ventas, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Forward-Looking Statements


This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements regarding our or our tenants’, operators’, borrowers’ or managers’ expected future financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, funds from operations, dividends and dividend plans, financing opportunities and plans, capital markets transactions, business strategy, budgets, projected costs, operating metrics, capital expenditures, competitive positions, acquisitions, investment opportunities, dispositions, merger integration, growth opportunities, expected lease income, continued qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), plans and objectives of management for future operations, and statements that include words such as “anticipate,” “if,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from our expectations. We do not undertake a duty to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.


Our actual future results and trends may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These factors include without limitation:


The ability and willingness of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other third parties to satisfy their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with us, including, in some cases, their obligations to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities;


The ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to maintain the financial strength and liquidity necessary to satisfy their respective obligations and liabilities to third parties, including without limitation obligations under their existing credit facilities and other indebtedness;


Our success in implementing our business strategy and our ability to identify, underwrite, finance, consummate and integrate diversifying acquisitions and investments;


Macroeconomic conditions such as a disruption of or lack of access to the capital markets, changes in the debt rating on U.S. government securities, default or delay in payment by the United States of its obligations, and changes in the federal or state budgets resulting in the reduction or nonpayment of Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates;


The nature and extent of future competition, including new construction in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and office buildings are located;


The extent and effect of future or pending healthcare reform and regulation, including cost containment measures and changes in reimbursement policies, procedures and rates;


Increases in our borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors;factors, including the potential phasing out of London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) after 2021;


The ability of our tenants, operators and managers, as applicable, to comply with laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our properties, to deliver high-quality services, to attract and retain qualified personnel and to attract residents and patients;


Changes in general economic conditions or economic conditions in the markets in which we may, from time to time, compete, and the effect of those changes on our revenues, earnings and funding sources;


Our ability to pay down, refinance, restructure or extend our indebtedness as it becomes due;


Our ability and willingness to maintain our qualification as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, tax and other considerations;




i



Final determination of our taxable net income for the year ended December 31, 20172019 and for the year ending December 31, 2018;2020;


The ability and willingness of our tenants to renew their leases with us upon expiration of the leases, our ability to reposition our properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event we exercise our right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations, including indemnification obligations, we may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant;


Risks associated with our senior living operating portfolio, such as factors that can cause volatility in our operating income and earnings generated by those properties, including without limitation national and regional economic conditions, development of new competing properties, costs of food, materials, energy, labor and services, employee benefit costs, insurance costs and professional and general liability claims, and the timely delivery of accurate property-level financial results for those properties;


Changes in exchange rates for any foreign currency in which we may, from time to time, conduct business;


Year-over-year changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or the U.K. Retail Price Index and the effect of those changes on the rent escalators contained in our leases and on our earnings;


Our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to obtain and maintain adequate property, liability and other insurance from reputable, financially stable providers;


The impact of damage to our properties from catastrophic weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change; 

The impact of increased operating costs and uninsured professional liability claims on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations or that of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers and our ability and the ability of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers to accurately estimate the magnitude of those claims;


Risks associated with our office building portfolio and operations, including our ability to successfully design, develop and manage office buildings and to retain key personnel;


The ability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our medical office buildings (“MOBs”) are located and their affiliated health systems to remain competitive and financially viable and to attract physicians and physician groups;


Risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition;


Our ability to obtain the financial results expected from our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures;


The impact of market or issuer events on the liquidity or value of our investments in marketable securities;


Consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers or significant changes in the senior management of our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers;


The impact of litigation or any financial, accounting, legal or regulatory issues that may affect us or our tenants, operators, borrowers or managers; and


Changes in accounting principles, or their application or interpretation, and our ability to make estimates and the assumptions underlying the estimates, which could have an effect on our earnings.


Many of these factors, some of which are described in greater detail under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are beyond our control and the control of our management.



ii


Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information


Each of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to

ii


file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) is not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC, but was subject to such reporting requirements prior to the closing of its acquisition by a consortium of TPG Capital (“TPG”), Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (“WCAS”) and Humana, Inc. in July 2018. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information, or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.


Kindred, Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”), Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) and
Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Kindred, Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.


iii



TABLE OF CONTENTS


Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 2.3.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.




iv



PART I

ITEM 1.    Business


BUSINESS


Overview


Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned more thanapproximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life scienceresearch and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and wesystems. We had 1422 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.


We primarily invest in seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased a total of 546412 properties (excluding MOBs)properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.

Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together, together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135122 properties (excluding one propertytwo properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement)agreements), 1011 properties and 3132 properties, (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.2019.


As of December 31, 2019, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) to manage 406 seniors housing communities for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.


We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. See our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, including “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” and “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Business Strategy


We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.


Generating Reliable and Growing Cash Flows


Generating reliable and growing cash flows from our seniors housing and healthcare assets enables us to pay regular cash dividends to stockholders and creates opportunities to increase stockholder value through profitable investments. The combination of steady contractual growth from our long-term triple-net leases, steady, reliable cash flows from our loan investments and stable cash flows from our office buildings with the higher growth potential inherent in our seniors housing operating communities drives our ability to generate sustainable, growing cash flows that are resilient to economic downturns.



Maintaining a Balanced, Diversified Portfolio of High-Quality Assets


We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/tenant or operator, revenue source and operating model diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business. Portfolio diversification also enhances the reliability of our cash flows by reducing our exposure to any individual tenant, operator or manager and making us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns.


Preserving Our Financial Strength, Flexibility and Liquidity


A strong, flexible balance sheet and excellent liquidity position us favorably to capitalize on strategic growth opportunities in the seniors housing and healthcare industries through acquisitions, investments and development and redevelopment projects. We maintain our financial strength to pursue profitable investment opportunities by actively managing our leverage, improving our cost of capital and preserving our access to multiple sources of liquidity, including unsecured bank debt, mortgage financings and public debt and equity markets.


20172019 Highlights and Other Recent Developments


Investments and Dispositions


In March 2017,June 2019, we provided new secured debt financing of $490 million to a subsidiarycertain subsidiaries of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group,Colony Capital, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-basedLondon Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based debt financing has a five-year term a(inclusive of three one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rateextension options). In connection with this transaction, our previous secured loan to certain subsidiaries of approximately 9.3% asColony Capital, Inc. of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.$282 million was paid in full.


During the year ended December 31, 2017,In September 2019, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one MOB) and three87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment)(including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”).  The portfolio continues to be managed by LGM.  We also have rights to fund and own all additional developments under an exclusive pipeline agreement with LGM.

During 2019, we also acquired four properties and one vacant land parcel for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3$237.0 million.


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we sold 53 triple-net leased24 properties five MOBs and certainour leasehold interest in one vacant land parcelsparcel for aggregate consideration of $870.8$147.5 million and we recognized a gain on the salesales of these assets of $717.3 million, net$26.0 million.

Liquidity and Capital

In January 2019, we established an unsecured commercial paper program. Under the terms of taxes.the program, we may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion.


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we received(a) repaid or redeemed $1.7 billion aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.     

Liquidity, Capital and Dividends

In March 2017, we issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issuedwith a weighted average coupon of 3.7% and sold C$275.0maturities between 2019 and 2043; (b) repaid $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4balance outstanding on the $300.0 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.that matures in 2023; and (c) repaid in full the $600.0 million unsecured term loan that was set to mature in 2024.


In August 2017,During 2019, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

In September 2017, we(a) entered into a new $400.0C$500 million secured revolving construction creditunsecured term loan facility whichpriced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 20222025; (b) issued a total of $2.3 billion of senior notes with a fixed coupon of 3.2% and will be primarily used to finance life sciencematurities between 2024 and innovation center2049; and other construction projects.(c) issued C$300 million floating rate senior notes maturing in 2021.


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we issued and sold 1.1an aggregate of 15.4 million shares of common stock under both a registered public offering and our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate netprogram for average gross proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775$63.45 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.

Portfolio

The sale of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. These assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.

Portfolio Summary


The following table summarizes our consolidated portfolio of properties and other investments, including construction in progress, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:2019:
     Real Estate Property Investments Revenues     Real Estate Property Investments Revenues
Asset Type 
# of
Properties (1)
 
# of Units/
Sq. Ft./Beds(2)
 Real Estate Property Investment, at Cost 
Percent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
 
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
 Revenue Percent of Total Revenues 
# of
Properties (1)
 
# of Units/
Sq. Ft./ Beds(2)
 Real Estate Property Investment, at Cost 
Percent of
Total Real Estate Property Investments
 
Real Estate
Property
Investment Per Unit/Bed/Sq. Ft.
 Revenue Percent of Total Revenues
 (Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
Seniors housing communities 747
 65,428
 $16,616,501 63.4% $254.0
 $2,342,247 65.5% 734
 70,633
 $18,192,047 63.1% $257.6
 $2,618,601 67.8%
MOBs(3)
 354
 19,221,003
 5,332,817
 20.3
 0.3
 579,363
 16.2
 347
 19,863,529
 5,709,478
 19.8
 0.3
 593,730
 15.3
Life science and innovation centers 29
 5,156,868
 1,940,099
 7.4
 0.4
 174,391
 4.9
Research and innovation centers 34
 6,300,841
 2,409,541
 8.4
 0.4
 253,488
 6.5
IRFs and LTACs 37
 3,115
 459,753
 1.8
 147.6
 154,094
 4.3
 37
 3,106
 459,535
 1.6
 148.0
 160,658
 4.1
Health systems 12
 2,064
 1,475,975
 5.6
 715.1
 109,546
 3.1
 12
 2,064
 1,517,814
 5.3
 735.4
 117,496
 3.0
SNFs 17
 1,882
 204,488
 0.8
 108.7
 64,086
 1.8
 16
 1,732
 201,700
 0.7
 116.5
 23,845
 0.6
Development properties and other 10
   176,200
 0.7
       18
   326,985
 1.1
      
Total real estate investments, at cost 1,206
   $26,205,833
 100.0%   

 

 1,198
   $28,817,100
 100.0%   

 

Income from loans and investments           117,608
 3.3
           89,201
 2.3
Interest and other income  
  
   

  
 6,034
 0.2
  
  
   

  
 10,984
 0.3
Revenues related to assets classified as held for sale 8
         26,780
 0.7
 15
         4,747
 0.1
Total revenues  
  
 

 

  
 $3,574,149
 100.0%  
  
 

 

  
 $3,872,750
 100.0%


(1) 
As of December 31, 2017,2019, we also owned 17five seniors housing communities 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. Our consolidated properties were located in 4645 states, the District of Columbia, seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom and were operated or managed by 9185 unaffiliated healthcare operating companies, including the following publicly traded companies or their subsidiaries: Brookdale Senior Living (129 properties) (excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment); Kindred (31 properties) (excluding one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment); 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc. (12 properties); Capital Senior Living Corporation (seven properties); Spire Healthcare plc (three properties); and HealthSouth Corp. (four properties).companies.
(2) 
Seniors housing communities are generally measured in units; MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers are measured by square footage; and IRFs and LTACs, health systems and SNFsskilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) are generally measured by licensed bed count.

(3) 
As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased 6563 of our consolidated MOBs pursuant to triple-net leases, Lillibridge or PMBRES managed 270273 of our consolidated MOBs and 1911 of our consolidated MOBs were managed by sevensix unaffiliated managers. Through Lillibridge, and PMBRES, we also provided management and leasing services for 10574 MOBs owned by third parties as of December 31, 2017.2019.


Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned a total of 1,2351,201 seniors housing and healthcare properties (including properties classified as held for sale) as follows:
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(5-25% interest)
 Total
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(25% interest)
 Total
Seniors housing communities738
 9
 17
 764
710
 38
 5
 753
MOBs314
 48
 1
 363
313
 35
 1
 349
Life science and innovation centers18
 11
 
 29
Research and innovation centers22
 12
 
 34
IRFs and LTACs

36
 1
 
 37
36
 1
 
 37
Health systems12
 
 
 12
12
 
 
 12
SNFs17
 
 13
 30
16
 
 
 16
Total1,135
 69
 31
 1,235
1,109
 86
 6
 1,201
    
Seniors Housing Communities


Our seniors housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping, meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health

providers and through close coordination with the resident’s physician and SNFs. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.


Medical Office Buildings


Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned or managed for third parties approximately 2321 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near a health system.


Life ScienceResearch and Innovation Centers


Our life scienceresearch and innovation centers contain laboratory and office space primarily for scientific research for universities, academic medical centers, technology, biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies and other organizations involved in the life scienceresearch and innovation industry. While these properties have characteristics similar to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, life scienceresearch and innovation center tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Our life scienceresearch and innovation centers are primarily located on or contiguous to university and academic medical campuses. The campus settings allow us the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants.


Inpatient Rehabilitation and Long-term Acute Care Facilities


We have 29 properties that are operated as LTACs. LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the

capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and we do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own eight IRFs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.


Health Systems


We have 12 properties that are operated as health systems. Health systems provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These health systems also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these health systems receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers and directly from patients.


Skilled Nursing Facilities


We have 1716 properties that are operated as SNFs. SNFs provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.


Geographic Diversification of Properties


Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019.


The following table shows our continuing rental income and resident fees and services by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
Rental Income and
Resident Fees and
Services
 
Percent of Total
Revenues
 (Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location   
California$546,184
 15.3%
New York308,366
 8.6
Texas206,709
 5.8
Illinois170,846
 4.8
Florida158,889
 4.4
Pennsylvania148,882
 4.2
Connecticut114,040
 3.2
Georgia114,038
 3.2
North Carolina112,137
 3.1
Arizona104,684
 2.9
Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)1,239,588
 34.8
Total U.S3,224,363
 90.3%
Canada (7 provinces)186,049
 5.2
United Kingdom26,418
 0.7
Total(1)
$3,436,830
 96.2%

(1)The remainder of our total revenues is office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
The following table shows our continuing NOI by geographic location for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 
NOI (1)
 
Percent of Total
NOI
 (Dollars in thousands)
Geographic Location   
California$288,435
 13.9%
Texas132,305
 6.4
New York119,123
 5.7
Illinois107,034
 5.1
Florida93,746
 4.5
Pennsylvania82,900
 4.0
Connecticut73,121
 3.5
North Carolina60,188
 2.9
Washington42,816
 2.1
Indiana43,992
 2.1
Other (36 states and the District of Columbia)801,854
 38.5
Total U.S1,845,514
 88.7%
Canada (7 provinces)92,112
 4.4
United Kingdom26,418
 1.3
Total (2)
$1,964,044
 94.4%

(1)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—NOI” included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of NOI to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, income from continuing operations.
(2)The remainder of our total NOI is income from loans and investments.

See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio.


Loans and Investments


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $1.4$1.0 billion of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Development and Redevelopment Projects


We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had 1422 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned through unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.


Segment Information


We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to these segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers


The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 20172019 (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned by investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017)2019):
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 Percent of Total Revenues Percent of NOI
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 Percent of Total Revenues Percent of NOI
Senior living operations (2)
293
 35.1% 51.9% 29.0%401
 43.4% 55.8% 31.1%
Brookdale Senior Living (3)(2)
129
 7.5
 4.9
 8.3
121
 7.7
 4.7
 8.7
Ardent10
 4.9
 3.1
 5.4
11
 4.7
 3.1
 5.8
Kindred (4)
32
 1.1
 4.3
 7.5
32
 1.0
 3.3
 6.3


(1)Based on gross book value.
(2)Excludes fourtwo properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities.
(3)Excludes six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreementagreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.
(4)Includes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.


Triple-Net Leased Properties


Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to

comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.


The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Brookdale Senior Living Leases


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased 129121 consolidated properties (excluding one propertytwo properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreementagreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment) to Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to multiple lease agreements.Living.


Pursuant to our lease agreements,agreement, Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the aggregate 20182020 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, excluding variable interest that Brookdale Senior Living is obligatedincluding a reduction for an annual rent credit equal to pay as additional rent based on certain floating rate mortgage debt,$7.0 million, was approximately $180.3$182.8 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living excluding the variable interest, was approximately $162.3 million (in each case, excluding six properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017). See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” and “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.$184.1 million.


Ardent Lease


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased 10 properties (excluding one MOB leased to Ardent under a separate lease) to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Per our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price indexConsumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, the aggregate 20182020 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent was approximately $113.4$120.9 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Ardent was also approximately $113.4$120.9 million.


Our 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint one of 11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.

Kindred Master Leases


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased 29 properties to Kindred pursuant to a master lease agreement. In November 2016, Kindred extended the lease term to 2025 for all of our LTACs operated by Kindred that were scheduled to mature in 2018 and 2020, at the current rent level.


The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in some cases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under the Kindred master lease for 25 properties is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to a floor and cap, and is 2.7% for four properties. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the aggregate 20182020 contractual cash rent due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.0$127.4 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Kindred was approximately $122.7$129.4 million.
 

Senior Living Operations


As of December 31, 2017,2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 269260 consolidated seniors housing communities for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements. Mostagreements with us. Under these management agreements, the operators receive annual base management fees ranging from 4.5% to 7% of ourrevenues generated by the applicable properties and, in some cases, additional management fees based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31,between 2024 or December 31,and 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004expiring between 2030 and as recently as 2012). The base management fees payable to Sunrise on consolidated assets under the Sunrise2038. In some cases, our management agreements generally range from 5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties. See “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.include renewal provisions.


Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under thosethe agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s orand Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certaincustomary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.

Competition


We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Our tenants, operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. Seniors housing community, SNF and health systems operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and

Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Employees


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had 493516 employees, none of which is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that relations with our employees are positive.


Insurance


We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ compliance with their respective insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.


We maintain the property insurance for all of our senior living operations, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations managed by Atria. However, Sunrise maintains the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations that it manages in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties, but the costs of such insurance are facility expenses paid from the revenues of those properties, regardless of who maintains the insurance.properties.


Through our office operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and any design, construction or systems failures related to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary course and may be asserted with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liability insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from, the affected MOB or life scienceresearch and innovation center, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by any of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the terms of, its respective lease, management and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Additional Information


We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.


We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to

stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.


GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION


Healthcare Regulation


Overview


Our tenants, operators and managers are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificate of need, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices, qualifications of personnel, adequacy of plant and equipment, and other laws and regulations governing the operation of healthcare facilities. Healthcare is a highly regulated industry and that trend will, in general, continue in the future. The applicable rules are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants, operators and managers to civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including: the possible loss of accreditation or license; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by tenants, operators and managers can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


In 2017, Congress came within a single voteA shift toward less comprehensive health coverage facilitated by current presidential administration regulation and new Medicaid waiver programs has the potential to reduce the number of repealing ofpeople with health insurance coverage. Additionally, coverage expansions via the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) through Medicaid expansion and substantially reducing funding tohealth insurance exchanges may be scaled back by litigation that may strike some or all of the ACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of people with Medicaid program. Short of full repeal, new legislation is likely to be introduced to seek similar changes in 2018. a given state.Beyond this, significant changes to commercial health insurance and government sponsored insurance (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) remain possible. Commercial and government payors, are likely to continue imposing greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators, through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.


Licensure, Certification and CONs


In general, the operators of our inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities, health systems and skilled nursing facilities (collectively “healthcare facilities”) must be licensed and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of medical care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a healthcare facility operator’s ability to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn, could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us.


In addition, many of our healthcare facilities are subject to state certificate of need (“CON”) laws that require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcare facilities and services. The approval process in these states generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process. CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’s ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-IfBusiness-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on usus” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


State CON laws remained largely unchanged in 2017, with the exception of North Carolina. North Carolina’s CON statute, underwent minor changes in 2017 by exempting from CON review new institutional health services involving the acquisition of an unlicensed adult care home that was previously licensed.


Compared to healthcare facilities, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors

housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.


As discussed in greater detail below, a number of states have instituted Medicaid waiver programs that blend the functions of healthcare and custodial care providers, and expand the scope of services that can be provided under certain licenses. The trend toward this kind of experimentation is likely to continue, and even hasten, under Republican leadership. The temporary and experimental nature of these programs means that states will also continue to adjust their licensing and certification processes which might result in some providers facing increased competition and others facing new requirements.


Fraud and Abuse Enforcement


Healthcare facilities and seniors housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are subject to various complex federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. These laws and regulations include, among others:


Federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs;


Federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment, receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients for items or services covered by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid;


Federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providers of certain designated health services in which the referring physician or an immediate family member of the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;


The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent acts; and


State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.


Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing these laws and regulations lies with a variety or federal, state and local governmental agencies, however many of the laws and regulations can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tam actions.


Congress has significantly increased funding to the governmental agencies charged with enforcing the healthcare fraud and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulations by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.


The current presidential administration has signaled it will expand current efforts to enforce healthcare fraud and abuse laws by increasing funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program. Additionally, Attorney General Jeff Sessions hasgovernment officials within HHS and the U.S. Department of Justice have stated that hethey will make it a high priority to prosecute fraud and abuse in federal claims while the administrator of the Centers for

Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), Seema Verma, has underscored this administration’s focus on healthcare fraud, stating that she will ensure that efforts preventing fraud and abuse are a priority.claims. Further, many state Medicaid programs continue to devote additional resources to fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives. Medicaid reform plans might include lowering the growth rate of Medicaid spending, which will put pressure on states to exert greater scrutiny over the utilization of services. It is likely that states will have increased flexibility and incentive to monitor utilization patterns and take action against outlier providers.


Medicare’s fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives are also being retooled bycontinue to be refined and refocused. Moratoria on new home health providers obtaining Medicare provider status and higher fees for labs show that the federal government will take actions to contain the number of providers that can bill Medicare in areas where wasteful billing is believed to exist. The current presidential administration. Because a backlogadministration has proposed expanding the extrapolated methods of provider appeals in response to Medicare audits, CMS finalized significant changes intended to expedite the Medicare appeals process in 2017, particularly at the administrative law judge level of review.  These changes apply to appeals of payment and coverage determinations for items and services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries, enrollees in Medicare Advantage and other Medicare competitive health plans, and enrollees in Medicare prescription drug plans, as well as to appeals of enrollment and entitlement determinations, and certain premium appeals. The Recovery Audit Contractor program, which has recovered more than $2 billion for the Medicare program, also continues to be controversial andinto the Medicare Advantage program. Further expansion of these larger finding audits may be modified underimplemented in the new administration.future.


Reimbursement


The majority of SNF reimbursement, and a significant percentage of health system, IRF and LTAC reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the ACA in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into SNFs. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.


As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The ACA was nearly repealed in 2017 and the current presidential administration continues to promulgate regulations to encourage the purchase of less comprehensive forms of health insurance for individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. In addition, the continued litigation regarding Texas v Azar may result in some or all of the ACA being invalidated. Such a determination could leave uninsured the roughly twenty million people currently covered by health insurance exchange qualified plans or by Medicaid expansion.
As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress nearly repealed the ACA in 2017 and remain committed to repealing the ACA and replacing it with a less federalized model for providing health insurance to individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. The details of the replacement model are not yet known, but potential end results could be fewer insured individuals and families or individuals and families maintaining less comprehensive insurance coverage. Outside of ACA repeal, Republicans leaders, particularly in the House of Representatives, are committed to pursuing entitlement reforms in 2018 that could lower funding to major federal programs, particularly Medicaid and lessen the number of people covered by these programs. Even without legislation, the current presidential administration has issued regulations that may lessen the number of people who purchase ACA-compliant health insurance, which has the potential to provide less protection to people coping with expensive health conditions. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact the resources of our operators.


Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from SNFs and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented home and community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a SNF. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. The current presidential administration is not necessarily opposed to these efforts, but is committed to giving states greater control of their Medicaid programs. The current administration has also approved several community engagement waivers that, based on the first implemented waiver in Arkansas, may result in tens thousands of people losing Medicaid coverage. The results of these reforms could be the modification or curtailment of a number of existing pilots.pilots and the number of people covered by Medicaid.


CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee-for-service reimbursement model to capitated and value-based approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly 10 million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care via accountable care organizations, and another 1921 million are enrolled in Medicare

Advantage health plans. The continued trend toward capitated and value-based approaches - particularly Medicare Advantage, which is expected to grow under the current presidential administration - has the potential to diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physicians and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such as medical resonance imaging services. This could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physicians and medical technology providers.


The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. Medicare’s payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services often desire. In addition, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in MOBs and other health care properties. The current presidential administration has made public comments about protecting Medicare generally

In 2019, federal regulators took a number of steps that could impact the operation of SNFs. For example, the federal government now publicly posts a large number of SNFs that are suspected of providing substandard care. A regulation proposed at the end of 2019, if finalized as proposed, would curb state provider taxes and improving Medicare and MACRA for healthcare providers, but few specificsfees that leverage the federal Medicaid match to deliver greater net funding to institutional provider such as SNFs. Moves to further regulate SNFs in 2020 are known at this time. A negative payment update in 2017 for home health reimbursement demonstrates that the current presidential administration, regardless of public statements, may take actions adverse to certain provider types.possible.


For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 8.4%7.3% of our total revenues and 14.5%13.3% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to acute and post-acute healthcare facilities in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.


Life ScienceResearch and Innovation Centers


In 2016, we entered the life scienceresearch and innovation (“life science”) sector through the acquisitions of substantially all of the university affiliated life scienceresearch and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. The life scienceresearch and innovation tenants of these assets are largely university-affiliated organizations. These university-affiliated life scienceresearch and innovation tenants are dependent on government funding to varying degrees. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and capital, in part because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance. Therefore, our tenants in the life scienceresearch and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.


Some of our life sciencesresearch and innovation tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant’s life sciencesresearch and innovation operation may be adversely affected or fail. Further, the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products requires federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain. Even after a life sciencesresearch and innovation tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance for a product, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products and the expiration of patent protection for the product. Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and government reimbursement policies, including changes under the current presidential administration or by private healthcare payors. Likewise, our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. If our life sciencesresearch and innovation tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Environmental Regulation


As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.


These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain

other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-WeBusiness-We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of

our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputesdisputes” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants, operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.


In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operators against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-up costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- up costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.


We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 20172019 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2018.2020.    


Canada


In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.


ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.

We have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:

Risks arising from our business;

Risks arising from our capital structure; and

Risks arising from our status as a REIT.

Risks Arising from Our Business

The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s orand Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.us.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 273260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added

costs by increasing the

rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s orand Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.us.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI, and we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties and properties that are collateral for the loans. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve such properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in such properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.

We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.

We lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various tenants and operators.  We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

A downturn in any of our tenants’ or operators’ businesses could ultimately lead to bankruptcy if it is unable to timely resolve the underlying causes, which may be largely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any recoveries in connection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing.

A debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.


Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also result in increased costs to the operator and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s financial condition and insolvency

proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple properties to a single operator under a master lease, as an operator failure or default under a master lease would expose us to these risks across multiple properties.

We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.renewed.

We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2017.2019. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.

We may terminate any of our Atria management agreements with Atria and Sunrise upon the occurrence of an event of default by Atriathe operator in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Atria’ssuch operator’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Atria.such operator. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on thetheir failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee.
Similarly, we may terminate any of our Sunrise management agreements upon the occurrence of an event of default by Sunrise in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to Sunrise’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to Sunrise. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets, or to comply with certain expense control covenants, subject to certain rights of Sunrise to make cure payments to us, and upon the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.

We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities, we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.us.

We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred master leases or any of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expiration of the lease term to arrange for repositioning of the properties and our tenants are required to continue to perform all of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases or other arrangements with new tenants or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adversely affect our ability to mitigate our losses and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rates and credit spreads, the availability of credit and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:

Interest rates and credit spreads; 

The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and

The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, the market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.

In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.

Deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.


Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions.transactions.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in domestic and international seniors housing and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be affected by many factors, including our

relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities include other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.

Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant, operator or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.

Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame or at all;

We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;

Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;

Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;

Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets;

The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; and

We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquisitions and investments without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:

Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;

Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;

Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;

Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and

Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.


As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we have now, and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements to which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amount and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansion of our hospitalhealth system and life scienceresearch and innovation portfolios and operations following the acquisition of AHS and the Life SciencesResearch and Innovation Acquisition.


As a result of our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) in 2015, we entered into the general acute care hospitalhealth system sector. Also, as a result of the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life scienceresearch and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) in 2016 (the “Life Sciences“Research and Innovation Acquisition”), we entered into the university-affiliated life scienceresearch and innovation sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our hospitalhealth system and life scienceresearch and innovation portfolios through additional acquisitions and development of new properties. Both the asset management of our existing general acute care hospitalhealth systems and university-affiliated life scienceresearch and innovation centers portfolios and such additional acquisitions and developments may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of hospitalshealth systems and Wexford and other operators and developers of life scienceresearch and innovation centers. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the general acute care hospitalhealth system and life scienceresearch and innovation sectors will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.

Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.

We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.

The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. Our tenants, operators and managers are large employers who compete for labor, making their results sensitive to changes in the labor market and/or wages and benefits offered to their employees. If our tenants, operators

and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels or controlling labor costs, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulation will not adversely affect the healthcare industry, including our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor can we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels or labor costs levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry, or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers, or costs of labor, could have a more pronounced effect on us than if we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare properties may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.


Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our senior living operating assets and office assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or office operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.

Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:

Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;

Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;

Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;

Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;

Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.

Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. Data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated deliveries of new seniors housing communities will remain at elevated levels in 2018,2019, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing properties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations are contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the properties subject to these leases do not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered. If strong economic conditions result in significant increases in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growth and profitability also may be limited.

We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.

Our investments in MOBs and other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties’ value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements are breached by us or terminated.


We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to foreclose on a lien securing a loan or otherwise delay or limit our pursuit of our rights and remedies. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.

Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our economic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a mezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real

estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.

Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.enforcement.

Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers and the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of life scienceresearch and innovation products. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also

could face increased costs related to changes in healthcare regulation, such as the possible repeal of the ACA by the current presidential administration and Republican-controlled Congress and a shift toward less comprehensive health coverage, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.us.

Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. In addition, coverage expansions via the ACA through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back asby litigation that may invalidate some or all of the current presidential administration and some membersACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of Congress lead efforts to repeal and replace the ACA.people with Medicaid coverage in a given state. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of certain of our tenants and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leases and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitabilityprofitability.

Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and general acute care hospitalhealth system space, are subject to the broad trend in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include both public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare and Medicaid require healthcare facilities, includingno longer reimburses hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, to report certain quality data to receive full reimbursement updates. In addition Medicare does not reimburse for care related to certain preventable adverse events (also called “never events”). Many large commercial payors currently require healthcare facilities to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburseimposes payment reductions on hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.readmissions. These punitive approaches could be expanded to additional types of providers in the future.
During the Obama administration, HHS focused on tying Medicare payments to quality or value through alternative payment models, which generally aim to make providers attentive to the total costs of treatment. Examples of alternative payment models include bundled-payment arrangements. It is unclear whether such models will successfully coordinate care and reduce costs or whether they will decrease reimbursement. The value-based purchasing trend is not limited to the public sector. Several of the nation’s largest commercial payors have also expressed an intent to increase reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. Further, many large commercial payors require hospitals to report quality data, and several commercial payors do not reimburse hospitals for certain preventable adverse events.
While the current presidential administration’s and some members of Congress’s desire to repeal the ACA creates unpredictability, weWe expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. For example, several of the nation’s largest commercial payors are increasing reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect the revenues and profitability of those of our tenants who are providers of healthcare services; however, if this trend significantly and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare services that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes at our healthcare facilities, the financial condition or results of operations of those tenants could be adversely affected.


Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of

our healthcare facilities, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The implementation of new patient criteria for LTACs will change the basis upon which certain of our tenants are reimbursed by Medicare, which could adversely affect those tenants’ revenues and profitability.
As part of the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013 enacted on December 26, 2013, Congress adopted various legislative changes impacting LTACs. These legislative changes create new Medicare criteria and payment rules for LTACs, and could have a material adverse impact on the revenues and profitability of the tenants of our LTACs. This material adverse impact could, in turn, negatively affect those tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


The hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.

Our MOB operations depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential, as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whose campus one of our MOBs is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, the hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.

We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:

We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;

We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;

We may not be able to recognize rental revenue in some cases although cash rent is being paid and the lease has commenced;

We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;


Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;

Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;

In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;

Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;

We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;

Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;

Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, due to competition from other developments; and


Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.

If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned 4835 MOBs, 11 life science12 research and innovation centers, nine38 seniors housing communities and one IRF through consolidated joint ventures, and we had 25% ownership interests in 17five seniors housing communities 13 SNFs and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria, a 34% ownership interest in Eclipse Senior Living and a 9.9%9.8% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2017.2019. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;

For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;

Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;

Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;

Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;

Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and

We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.


Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.

Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our tenants in the life scienceresearch and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.
Life science
Research and innovation tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, including the following:

Some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. The economic environment in recent years has significantly impacted the ability of these companies to access the capital markets and venture capital funding. In addition, state and federal government and university budgets have been negatively impacted by the recent economic environment and, as a result certain

programs, including grants related to biotechnology research and development, may be at risk of being eliminated or cut back significantly. If private investors, the government, universities, public markets or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, a tenant’s business may fail.


The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect our tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.


Our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.


Collaborative relationships with other life scienceresearch and innovation entities may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or marketing of our tenants’ products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.


Legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, including regulations and legislation relating to the ACA, may include government intervention in product pricing and other changes that adversely affect reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products. In addition, sales of many of our tenants’ marketable products are dependent, in large part, on the availability and extent of reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Changes in government regulations, price controls or third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products and adversely impact our tenants’ businesses.


We cannot assure you that our tenants in the life scienceresearch and innovation industry will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the amount and scope of insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe

the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the future cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their obligations to us. If we or the managers of our senior living operations decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses incurred could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Following the occurrence of such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations

related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.

Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change could result in losses to the Company.

Certain of our properties are located in areas particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase or damage caused by catastrophic weather and other natural events, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our or our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ property insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable.

To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue.

The decision of the United Kingdom to exit the European Union could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In 2019, we derived 1.3% of our NOI from the United Kingdom. The decision made in the British referendum of June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has led to volatility in the financial markets of the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”), and more broadly across Europe and may also lead to weakening in consumer, corporate and financial confidence in such markets. The U.K. government initiated the official EU withdrawal process on March 29, 2017, and the exit from the EU was expected to occur by the end of March 2019. However, the withdrawal was extended several times due to deadlock in negotiations. On January 29, 2020, the U.K. Parliament approved a withdrawal agreement submitted on January 22, 2020, and the U.K. officially withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020. There is a transition period through December 2020, with an option to extend an additional one to two years, to allow for businesses and individuals to adjust to its

changes, during which all EU regulations will continue to apply to the U.K. Trade negotiations are expected to begin in early March 2020, but the nature of the economic relationship between the EU and U.K. remains uncertain, and there is no guarantee that both parties will be able to reach an agreement before the transition period expires. This Brexit decision has created political and economic uncertainty, particularly in the U.K. and the EU, and this uncertainty may last for years. Our business could be affected during this period of uncertainty, and perhaps longer, by the impact of the U.K. referendum. In addition, our business could be negatively affected by new trade agreements between the U.K. and other countries, including the U.S., and by the possible imposition of trade or other regulatory barriers in the U.K. These possible negative impacts, and others resulting from the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU, could adversely affect our and our tenants’ businesses, financial conditions and results of operations.

Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants, operators and managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we may be subject to claims brought against us in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to professional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay punitive damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities.

The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.

As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.

Our operators may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute.

Our operators who engage in business with the federal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.disputes.

Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operators of our properties for contamination

caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.

The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and

employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our financial results.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, approximately 35.6%34.8% of our total NOI was derived from properties located in California (13.9%), Texas (6.4%(13.8%), New York (5.7%(6.4%), Texas (5.9%), Illinois (5.1%(4.6%) and Florida (4.5%Pennsylvania (4.1%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Risks ArisingSeniors Housing and Healthcare Properties

As of December 31, 2019, we owned a total of 1,201 seniors housing and healthcare properties (including properties classified as held for sale) as follows:
 
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(25% interest)
 Total
Seniors housing communities710
 38
 5
 753
MOBs313
 35
 1
 349
Research and innovation centers22
 12
 
 34
IRFs and LTACs

36
 1
 
 37
Health systems12
 
 
 12
SNFs16
 
 
 16
Total1,109
 86
 6
 1,201
Seniors Housing Communities

Our seniors housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping, meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health

providers and through close coordination with the resident’s physician and SNFs. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.

Medical Office Buildings

Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2019, we owned or managed for third parties approximately 21 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near a health system.

Research and Innovation Centers

Our Capital Structureresearch and innovation centers contain laboratory and office space primarily for scientific research for universities, academic medical centers, technology, biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies and other organizations involved in the research and innovation industry. While these properties have characteristics similar to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, research and innovation center tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Our research and innovation centers are primarily located on or contiguous to university and academic medical campuses. The campus settings allow us the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants.

Inpatient Rehabilitation and Long-term Acute Care Facilities

We may becomehave 29 properties that are operated as LTACs. LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and we do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own eight IRFs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.

Health Systems

We have 12 properties that are operated as health systems. Health systems provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These health systems also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these health systems receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers and directly from patients.

Skilled Nursing Facilities

We have 16 properties that are operated as SNFs. SNFs provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.


Geographic Diversification of Properties

Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more leveraged.than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Loans and Investments

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately $11.3$1.0 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The instruments governing our existing indebtedness permitnet loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Development and Redevelopment Projects

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to incur substantial additional debt,develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2019, we had 22 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including secured debt, and we may satisfy our capital and liquidity needsfour properties that are owned through additional borrowings. A high level of indebtedness would require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the funds available to implement our business strategy and make distributions to stockholders. A high level of indebtedness could also have the following consequences:
Potential limits on our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions and vulnerability in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in theunconsolidated real estate or healthcare industries;
Potential impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing to execute on our business strategy; and
Potential downgrade in the rating of our debt securities by one or more rating agencies, which could have the effect of, among other things, limiting our access to capital and increasing our cost of borrowing.
entities. In addition, from time to time, we mortgage certainengage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Segment Information

We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to these segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned by investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2019):
 
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 Percent of Total Revenues Percent of NOI
Senior living operations401
 43.4% 55.8% 31.1%
Brookdale Senior Living (2)
121
 7.7
 4.7
 8.7
Ardent11
 4.7
 3.1
 5.8
Kindred32
 1.0
 3.3
 6.3

(1)Based on gross book value.
(2)Excludes two properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.

Triple-Net Leased Properties

Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to secure paymentpay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to

comply with the terms of indebtedness.the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2019. If we areBrookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to meetsatisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our mortgage payments, then the encumbered propertiesfinancial condition and results of operations could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a resulting loss of incomedecline, and asset value.
We are exposed to increases in interest rates, which could reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sellservice our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or engage in acquisition, investment, developmentunwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and redevelopment activity,liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our decisionability to hedge against interest rate risk might notmake distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be effective.
We receiveable to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Brookdale Senior Living Leases

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 121 consolidated properties (excluding two properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment) to Brookdale Senior Living.

Pursuant to our lease agreement, Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, including a reduction for an annual rent credit equal to $7.0 million, was approximately $182.8 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living was approximately $184.1 million.

Ardent Lease

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 10 properties (excluding one MOB leased to Ardent under a separate lease) to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Per our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent was approximately $120.9 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Ardent was also approximately $120.9 million.

Our 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint one of 11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.

Kindred Master Leases

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 29 properties to Kindred pursuant to a master lease agreement. In November 2016, Kindred extended the lease term to 2025 for all of our LTACs operated by Kindred that were scheduled to mature in 2018 and 2020, at the current rent level.

The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in some cases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under the Kindred master lease for 25 properties is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to a floor and cap, and is 2.7% for four properties. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Kindred was approximately $127.4 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Kindred was approximately $129.4 million. 

Senior Living Operations

As of December 31, 2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 260 consolidated seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements with us. Under these management agreements, the operators receive annual base management fees ranging from 4.5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties and, in some cases, additional management fees based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring between 2024 and 2027, and our management agreements with Sunrise have terms expiring between 2030 and 2038. In some cases, our management agreements include renewal provisions.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to customary rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.
Competition

We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our tenants, operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. Seniors housing community, SNF and health systems operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Employees

As of December 31, 2019, we had 516 employees, none of which is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that relations with our employees are positive.

Insurance

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ compliance with their respective insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.

We maintain the property insurance for all of our senior living operations, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations managed by Atria. However, Sunrise maintains the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations that it manages in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties.

Through our office operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and any design, construction or systems failures related to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary course and may be asserted with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liability insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from, the affected MOB or research and innovation center, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by any of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the terms of, its respective lease, management and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Additional Information

We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.


GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION

Healthcare Regulation

Overview

Our tenants, operators and managers are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificate of need, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices, qualifications of personnel, adequacy of plant and equipment, and other laws and regulations governing the operation of healthcare facilities. Healthcare is a highly regulated industry and that trend will, in general, continue in the future. The applicable rules are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants, operators and managers to civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including: the possible loss of accreditation or license; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by tenants, operators and managers can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A shift toward less comprehensive health coverage facilitated by current presidential administration regulation and new Medicaid waiver programs has the potential to reduce the number of people with health insurance coverage. Additionally, coverage expansions via the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back by litigation that may strike some or all of the ACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of people with Medicaid in a given state.Beyond this, significant changes to commercial health insurance and government sponsored insurance (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) remain possible. Commercial and government payors, are likely to continue imposing greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators, through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

Licensure, Certification and CONs

In general, the operators of our inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities, health systems and skilled nursing facilities (collectively “healthcare facilities”) must be licensed and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of medical care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a healthcare facility operator’s ability to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn, could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us.

In addition, many of our healthcare facilities are subject to state certificate of need (“CON”) laws that require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcare facilities and services. The approval process in these states generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process. CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’s ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compared to healthcare facilities, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors

housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.

As discussed in greater detail below, a number of states have instituted Medicaid waiver programs that blend the functions of healthcare and custodial care providers, and expand the scope of services that can be provided under certain licenses. The trend toward this kind of experimentation is likely to continue, and even hasten, under Republican leadership. The temporary and experimental nature of these programs means that states will also continue to adjust their licensing and certification processes which might result in some providers facing increased competition and others facing new requirements.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

Healthcare facilities and seniors housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are subject to various complex federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. These laws and regulations include, among others:

Federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs;

Federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment, receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients for items or services covered by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid;

Federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providers of certain designated health services in which the referring physician or an immediate family member of the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;

The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent acts; and

State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.

Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing these laws and regulations lies with a variety or federal, state and local governmental agencies, however many of the laws and regulations can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tam actions.

Congress has significantly increased funding to the governmental agencies charged with enforcing the healthcare fraud and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulations by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

The current presidential administration has signaled it will expand current efforts to enforce healthcare fraud and abuse laws by increasing funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program. Additionally, government officials within HHS and the U.S. Department of Justice have stated that they will make it a high priority to prosecute fraud and abuse in federal claims. Further, many state Medicaid programs continue to devote additional resources to fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives. Medicaid reform plans might include lowering the growth rate of Medicaid spending, which will put pressure on states to exert greater scrutiny over the utilization of services. It is likely that states will have increased flexibility and incentive to monitor utilization patterns and take action against outlier providers.


Medicare’s fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives continue to be refined and refocused. Moratoria on new home health providers obtaining Medicare provider status and higher fees for labs show that the federal government will take actions to contain the number of providers that can bill Medicare in areas where wasteful billing is believed to exist. The current administration has proposed expanding the extrapolated methods of the Recovery Audit Contractor program, which has recovered more than $2 billion for the Medicare program, into the Medicare Advantage program. Further expansion of these larger finding audits may be implemented in the future.

Reimbursement

The majority of SNF reimbursement, and a significant percentage of health system, IRF and LTAC reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the ACA in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into SNFs. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.

As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The ACA was nearly repealed in 2017 and the current presidential administration continues to promulgate regulations to encourage the purchase of less comprehensive forms of health insurance for individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. In addition, the continued litigation regarding Texas v Azar may result in some or all of the ACA being invalidated. Such a determination could leave uninsured the roughly twenty million people currently covered by health insurance exchange qualified plans or by Medicaid expansion.

Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from SNFs and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented home and community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a SNF. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. The current presidential administration is not necessarily opposed to these efforts, but is committed to giving states greater control of their Medicaid programs. The current administration has also approved several community engagement waivers that, based on the first implemented waiver in Arkansas, may result in tens thousands of people losing Medicaid coverage. The results of these reforms could be the modification or curtailment of a number of existing pilots and the number of people covered by Medicaid.

CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee-for-service reimbursement model to capitated and value-based approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly 10 million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care via accountable care organizations, and another 21 million are enrolled in Medicare Advantage health plans. The continued trend toward capitated and value-based approaches - particularly Medicare Advantage, which is expected to grow under the current presidential administration - has the potential to diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physicians and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such as medical resonance imaging services. This could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physicians and medical technology providers.


The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. Medicare’s payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services often desire. In addition, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in MOBs and other health care properties.

In 2019, federal regulators took a number of steps that could impact the operation of SNFs. For example, the federal government now publicly posts a large number of SNFs that are suspected of providing substandard care. A regulation proposed at the end of 2019, if finalized as proposed, would curb state provider taxes and fees that leverage the federal Medicaid match to deliver greater net funding to institutional provider such as SNFs. Moves to further regulate SNFs in 2020 are possible.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 7.3% of our total revenues and 13.3% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to acute and post-acute healthcare facilities in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.

Research and Innovation Centers

In 2016, we entered the research and innovation sector through the acquisitions of substantially all of the university affiliated research and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. The research and innovation tenants of these assets are largely university-affiliated organizations. These university-affiliated research and innovation tenants are dependent on government funding to varying degrees. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and capital, in part because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance. Therefore, our tenants in the research and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

Some of our research and innovation tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant’s research and innovation operation may be adversely affected or fail. Further, the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products requires federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain. Even after a research and innovation tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance for a product, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products and the expiration of patent protection for the product. Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and government reimbursement policies, including changes under the current presidential administration or by private healthcare payors. Likewise, our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. If our research and innovation tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental Regulation

As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.

These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of

our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants, operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.

In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operators against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-up costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- up costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.

We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 2019 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2020.    

Canada

In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.

We have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:

Risks arising from our business;

Risks arising from our capital structure; and

Risks arising from our status as a REIT.

Risks Arising from Our Business

The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

As of December 31, 2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added

costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI, and we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties and properties that are collateral for the loans. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve such properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in such properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.

We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.

We lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various tenants and operators.  We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

A downturn in any of our tenants’ or operators’ businesses could ultimately lead to bankruptcy if it is unable to timely resolve the underlying causes, which may be largely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any recoveries in connection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing.

A debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.


Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also result in increased costs to the operator and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s financial condition and insolvency proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple properties to a single operator under a master lease, as an operator failure or default under a master lease would expose us to these risks across multiple properties.

We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.

We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2019. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.

We may terminate any of our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise upon the occurrence of an event of default by the operator in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to such operator’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to such operator. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on their failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets, subject to certain rights of Sunrise to make cure payments to us, and upon the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.

We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities, we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred master leases or any of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expiration of the lease term to arrange for repositioning of the properties and our tenants are required to continue to perform all of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases or other arrangements with new tenants or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adversely affect our ability to mitigate our losses and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rates and credit spreads, the availability of credit and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:

Interest rates and credit spreads; 

The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and

The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, the market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.

In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.

Deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.


Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in domestic and international seniors housing and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be affected by many factors, including our relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities include other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.

Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant, operator or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.

Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame or at all;

We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;

Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;

Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;

Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets;

The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; and

We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquisitions and investments without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:

Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;

Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;

Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;

Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and

Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we have now, and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements to which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amount and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansion of our health system and research and innovation portfolios and operations following the acquisition of AHS and the Research and Innovation Acquisition.

As a result of our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) in 2015, we entered into the health system sector. Also, as a result of the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated research and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) in 2016 (the “Research and Innovation Acquisition”), we entered into the university-affiliated research and innovation sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our health system and research and innovation portfolios through additional acquisitions and development of new properties. Both the asset management of our existing health systems and university-affiliated research and innovation centers portfolios and such additional acquisitions and developments may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of health systems and Wexford and other operators and developers of research and innovation centers. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the health system and research and innovation sectors will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.

Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.

We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.

The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. Our tenants, operators and managers are large employers who compete for labor, making their results sensitive to changes in the labor market and/or wages and benefits offered to their employees. If our tenants, operators

and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels or controlling labor costs, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulation will not adversely affect the healthcare industry, including our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor can we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels or labor costs levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry, or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers, or costs of labor, could have a more pronounced effect on us than if we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare properties may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our senior living operating assets and office assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or office operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.

Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:

Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;

Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;

Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;

Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;

Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.

Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. Data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated deliveries of new seniors housing communities will remain at elevated levels in 2019, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing assets underproperties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations while certainare contingent upon the achievement of our debt obligations are floating rate obligationsspecified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with interestcaps and related payments that vary with the movementfloors. If, as a result of LIBOR, Bankers’ Acceptanceweak economic conditions or other indexes. Thefactors, the properties subject to these leases do not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered. If strong economic conditions result in significant increases in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growth and profitability also may be limited.


generally fixed rate natureWe own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of a significant portion of our revenues and the variable rate nature of certain of our debt obligations create interest rate risk. Although our operating assets provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, the costs of our existing floating rate debt and any new debt that we incur would increase. These increased costs could reduce our profitability, impairproperties, restrict our ability to meetsell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.

Our investments in MOBs and other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our debt obligations,uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or increaseotherwise transfer our interests in the costproperties or restrict the leasing of financing our acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity. An increase in interest rates also couldthe properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturitytimely sell or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing, as well as decreaseexchange the amount that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to promptly reposition our portfolio in response to changes in economicproperties, impair the properties’ value or other conditions.
We may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility with hedging arrangements that involve additional risks, including the risks that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that the amount of income we earn from hedging transactions may be limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs, and that these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than otherwise would be the case. Moreover, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk, if we choose to engage in such activities, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Although we believe that we have sufficient access to capital and other sources of funding to meet our expected liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operation and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.
As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt couldnegatively impact our ability to access capitalfind suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or increase our borrowing costs. We also rely on the financial institutions thatother restrictive agreements are parties to our revolving credit facilities. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standardsbreached by us or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, theyterminated.

We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us,reposition any acquired properties, which wouldcould adversely affect our ability to drawrecover our investments.

If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our revolving credit facilities and,investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over time, could negativelythe bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expendituresforeclose on a lien securing a loan or make distributions to our stockholders.
Covenants in the instruments governing our and our subsidiaries’ existing indebtednessotherwise delay or limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.
The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness require us to comply with certain customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to our compliance with these covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the applicable debt instruments and could trigger defaults under anypursuit of our other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted againstrights and remedies. Any such instruments, even if we satisfy our payment obligations. In addition, covenants contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness may restrictdelay or limit on our ability to obtain cash distributions from such subsidiaries for the purpose of meetingpursue our debt service obligations. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from our breach of any of these covenants,rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Risks Arising from Our Status as a REIT
LossEven if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences for us andremedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our common stock.secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.

Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we losewould need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our statuseconomic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a REIT (currentlymezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real

estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.

Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.

Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers and the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of research and innovation products. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any taxchanges in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also could face increased costs related to changes in healthcare regulation, such as a shift toward less comprehensive health coverage, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.

Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. In addition, coverage expansions via the ACA through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back by litigation that may invalidate some or all of the ACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of people with Medicaid coverage in a given state. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of certain of our tenants and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leases and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitability.

Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and health system space, are subject to the broad trend in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare no longer reimburses hospitals for care related to certain preventable adverse events and imposes payment reductions on hospitals for preventable readmissions. These punitive approaches could be expanded to additional types of providers in the future.

We expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. For example, several of the nation’s largest commercial payors are increasing reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect the revenues and profitability of those of our tenants who are providers of healthcare services; however, if this trend significantly and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare services that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes at our healthcare facilities, the financial condition or results of operations of those tenants could be adversely affected.

Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of our healthcare facilities, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.

Our MOB operations depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential, as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whose campus one of our MOBs is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, the hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.

We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:

We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;

We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;

We may not be able to recognize rental revenue in some cases although cash rent is being paid and the lease has commenced;

We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;


Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;

Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;

In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;

Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;

We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;

Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;

Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, due to competition from other developments; and

Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.

If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 35 MOBs, 12 research and innovation centers, 38 seniors housing communities and one IRF through consolidated joint ventures, and we had 25% ownership interests in five seniors housing communities and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria, a 34% ownership interest in Eclipse Senior Living and a 9.8% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2019. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;

For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;

Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;

Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;

Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;

Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and

We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.


Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.

Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our tenants in the research and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

Research and innovation tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, including the following:

Some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. The economic environment in recent years has significantly impacted the ability of these companies to access the capital markets and venture capital funding. In addition, state and federal government and university budgets have been negatively impacted by the recent economic environment and, as a result certain programs, including grants related to biotechnology research and development, may be at risk of being eliminated or cut back significantly. If private investors, the government, universities, public markets or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, a tenant’s business may fail.

The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect our tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.

Our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.

Collaborative relationships with other research and innovation entities may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or marketing of our tenants’ products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.

Legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, including regulations and legislation relating to the ACA, may include government intervention in product pricing and other changes that adversely affect reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products. In addition, sales of many of our tenants’ marketable products are dependent, in large part, on the availability and extent of reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Changes in government regulations, price controls or third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products and adversely impact our tenants’ businesses.

We cannot assure you that our tenants in the research and innovation industry will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the statuteamount and scope of limitations has not expired),insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe

the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will face serious tax consequencescontinue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will substantiallybe available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the funds availablefuture cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy ourtheir obligations to us. If we or the managers of our senior living operations decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses incurred could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Following the occurrence of such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.

Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change could result in losses to the Company.

Certain of our properties are located in areas particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase or damage caused by catastrophic weather and other natural events, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our or our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ property insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business strategy and our financial condition and results of operations. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable.

To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to make distributionsor a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our stockholders for eachexisting properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue.

The decision of the United Kingdom to exit the European Union could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In 2019, we derived 1.3% of our NOI from the United Kingdom. The decision made in the British referendum of June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has led to volatility in the financial markets of the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”), and more broadly across Europe and may also lead to weakening in consumer, corporate and financial confidence in such markets. The U.K. government initiated the official EU withdrawal process on March 29, 2017, and the exit from the EU was expected to occur by the end of March 2019. However, the withdrawal was extended several times due to deadlock in negotiations. On January 29, 2020, the U.K. Parliament approved a withdrawal agreement submitted on January 22, 2020, and the U.K. officially withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020. There is a transition period through December 2020, with an option to extend an additional one to two years, involved because:to allow for businesses and individuals to adjust to its
We would not
changes, during which all EU regulations will continue to apply to the U.K. Trade negotiations are expected to begin in early March 2020, but the nature of the economic relationship between the EU and U.K. remains uncertain, and there is no guarantee that both parties will be allowed a deductionable to reach an agreement before the transition period expires. This Brexit decision has created political and economic uncertainty, particularly in the U.K. and the EU, and this uncertainty may last for distributionsyears. Our business could be affected during this period of uncertainty, and perhaps longer, by the impact of the U.K. referendum. In addition, our business could be negatively affected by new trade agreements between the U.K. and other countries, including the U.S., and by the possible imposition of trade or other regulatory barriers in the U.K. These possible negative impacts, and others resulting from the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU, could adversely affect our and our tenants’ businesses, financial conditions and results of operations.

Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants, operators and managers to stockholders in computingincreased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our taxable incomeor their liquidity, financial condition and wouldresults of operations.

From time to time, we may be subject to regular U.S. federal corporate income tax;claims brought against us in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.
We could
In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to increased stateprofessional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and local taxes;attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and
Unless severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are entitledunable to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.
In addition, in such event we would no longer bemaintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay dividendspunitive damages, we or they may be exposed to maintain REIT status, whichsubstantial liabilities.

The occurrence of cyber incidents could adversely affectdisrupt our operations, result in the valueloss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.

As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our common stock.managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.
Qualification as
Our operators may be sued under a REIT involvesfederal whistleblower statute.

Our operators who engage in business with the applicationfederal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of highly technicalthis Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and complex provisionsaward bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.

Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the Internal Revenue Codeproperty. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operators of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)our properties for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determinationcontamination

caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, as well as new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, may adversely affect our investors orthis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy a numberattract and retain talented employees, and the loss of requirements, generally including requirements regarding the ownershipany one of our stock, requirements regarding the compositionkey personnel could adversely impact our business.

The success of our assets, a requirement that at least 95%business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources,executive management team and we must make distributionskey employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains. Although we believe that we currently qualify as a REIT,future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify for all future periods.
The 90% distribution requirement will decreaseretain our liquiditykey officers and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions.
To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. Such distributions reduce the funds we have available to finance our investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment activity and may limit our ability to engage in transactions that are otherwise in the best interests of our stockholders.
Although we do not anticipate any inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cashemployees or other liquid assets to do so. For example, timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand, or non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may prevent us from having sufficient cash or liquid assets to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement.
In the event that timing differences occur or we decide to retain cash or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, we may seek to borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Any of these actions may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations; however, see “Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain of these transactions.
To preserve our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation contains ownership limits with respect to our capital stock that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company.
To assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9.0% of our outstanding common stock or more than 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of the applicable limit are considered “excess shares” and are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the excess shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the excess shares. In addition, we have the right to purchase the excess shares for a price equal to the lesser

of (i) the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or (ii) the market price on the day we purchase the shares, but if we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the shares at the direction of our Board of Directors. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Our use of TRSs is limited under the Code.

Under the Code, no more than 20% of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our TRSs’ operations and assets, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable limitation, or that such compliance will not adversely affect our business. Also, our TRSs may not, amongattract and retain other things, operate or manage certain health care facilities, which may cause us to forego investments we might otherwise make. Finally, we may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the income derived from certain transactions with our TRSs that are not on an arm's-length basis. We believe our arrangements with our TRSs are on arm's-length terms and intend to continue to operate in a manner that allows us to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid application of that tax.

The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions which would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customershighly qualified individuals in the ordinary coursefuture. Losing any one or more of business. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available safe harbors.

Legislative or other actions affecting REITsthese persons could have a negative effectMaterial Adverse Effect on our stockholders or us.
The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process
Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changesfinancial condition.

Pursuant to the tax laws,Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or without retroactive application,improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our investorsfinancial results.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 34.8% of our total NOI was derived from properties located in California (13.8%), New York (6.4%), Texas (5.9%), Illinois (4.6%) and Pennsylvania (4.1%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws mightlocal real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our investors or us. New legislation,business and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantlydollars and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification,Canadian dollars or the federal income tax consequencesBritish pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of an investmentoperations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, us. Also,or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the law relating toUnited States, Canada or the tax treatment of other entities, or an investmentUnited Kingdom, we may transact business in other entities, could change, making an investmentforeign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in such other entities more attractive relativelocal currencies, to an investment in a REIT.

The recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) has significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. Changes made by the 2017 Tax Act that could affect us and our stockholders include:
temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, which previously imposed a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;
permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our stockholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;
reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;
limiting our deduction for net operating losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction);
generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s “adjusted taxable income,” except for taxpayers (including most equity REITs) that engage in certain real estate businesses

and elect out of this rule (providedprotect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system with longer depreciation periods); and
eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Many of these changes are effective immediately, without any transition periods or grandfathering for existing transactions. The 2017 Tax Act is unclear in many respects and could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementing regulations by the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS, any of which could lessen or increase the impact of the 2017 Tax Act. In addition, it is unclear how these U.S. federal income tax changesfluctuations will affect state and local taxation, which often uses federal taxable income asnot have a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities. While some of the changes made by the 2017 Tax Act may adversely affect us in one or more reporting periods and prospectively, other changes may be beneficial on a going forward basis. We continue to work with our tax advisors and auditors to determine the full impact that the 2017 Tax Act as a whole will haveMaterial Adverse Effect on us.


ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

ITEM 2.    Properties
Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned a total of 1,201 seniors housing and healthcare properties (including properties classified as held for sale) as follows:
 
Consolidated
(100% interest)
 
Consolidated
(<100% interest)
 
Unconsolidated
(25% interest)
 Total
Seniors housing communities710
 38
 5
 753
MOBs313
 35
 1
 349
Research and innovation centers22
 12
 
 34
IRFs and LTACs

36
 1
 
 37
Health systems12
 
 
 12
SNFs16
 
 
 16
Total1,109
 86
 6
 1,201
Seniors Housing Communities

Our seniors housing communities include independent and assisted living communities, continuing care retirement communities and communities providing care for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia or memory loss. These communities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom residential units on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals requiring various levels of assistance. Basic services for residents of these communities include housekeeping, meals in a central dining area and group activities organized by the staff with input from the residents. More extensive care and personal supervision, at additional fees, are also available for such needs as eating, bathing, grooming, transportation, limited therapeutic programs and medication administration, which allow residents certain conveniences and enable them to live as independently as possible according to their abilities. These services are often met by home health

providers and through close coordination with the resident’s physician and SNFs. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.

Medical Office Buildings

Typically, our MOBs are multi-tenant properties leased to several unrelated medical practices, although in many cases they may be associated with a large single specialty or multi-specialty group. Tenants include physicians, dentists, psychologists, therapists and other healthcare providers, who require space devoted to patient examination and treatment, diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery and other outpatient services. MOBs are similar to commercial office buildings, although they require greater plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate physicians’ requirements such as sinks in every room, brighter lights and specialized medical equipment. As of December 31, 2019, we owned or managed for third parties approximately 21 million square feet of MOBs that are predominantly located on or near a health system.

Research and Innovation Centers

Our research and innovation centers contain laboratory and office space primarily for scientific research for universities, academic medical centers, technology, biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies and other organizations involved in the research and innovation industry. While these properties have characteristics similar to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, research and innovation center tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Our research and innovation centers are primarily located on or contiguous to university and academic medical campuses. The campus settings allow us the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants.

Inpatient Rehabilitation and Long-term Acute Care Facilities

We have 29 properties that are operated as LTACs. LTACs have a Medicare average length of stay of greater than 25 days and serve medically complex, chronically ill patients who require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, but whose conditions do not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. The operators of these LTACs have the capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients often depend on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines, and, due to their severe medical conditions, generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital. All of our LTACs are freestanding facilities, and we do not own any “hospitals within hospitals.” We also own eight IRFs devoted to the rehabilitation of patients with various neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopedic and other medical conditions following stabilization of their acute medical issues.

Health Systems

We have 12 properties that are operated as health systems. Health systems provide medical and surgical services, including inpatient care, intensive care, cardiac care, diagnostic services and emergency services. These health systems also provide outpatient services such as outpatient surgery, laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, cardiology and physical therapy. In the United States, these health systems receive payments for patient services from the federal government primarily under the Medicare program, state governments under their respective Medicaid or similar programs, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, other private insurers and directly from patients.

Skilled Nursing Facilities

We have 16 properties that are operated as SNFs. SNFs provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high technology, care-intensive, high cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitation hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapies, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment. Charges for these services are generally paid from a combination of government reimbursement and private sources.


Geographic Diversification of Properties

Our portfolio of seniors housing and healthcare properties is broadly diversified by geographic location throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, with properties in only one state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Loans and Investments

As of December 31, 2019, we had $1.0 billion of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. Our loans receivable and investments provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are typically secured by mortgage liens or leasehold mortgages on the underlying properties and corporate or personal guarantees by affiliates of the borrowing entity. In some cases, the loans are secured by a pledge of ownership interests in the entity or entities that own the related seniors housing or healthcare properties. From time to time, we also make investments in mezzanine loans, which are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Development and Redevelopment Projects

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2019, we had 22 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned through unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Segment Information

We operate through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Non-segment assets, classified as “all other,” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable. Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to these segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Significant Tenants, Operators and Managers

The following table summarizes certain information regarding our tenant, operator and manager concentration as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned by investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2019):
 
Number of
Properties Leased
or Managed
 
Percent of Total Real Estate Investments (1)
 Percent of Total Revenues Percent of NOI
Senior living operations401
 43.4% 55.8% 31.1%
Brookdale Senior Living (2)
121
 7.7
 4.7
 8.7
Ardent11
 4.7
 3.1
 5.8
Kindred32
 1.0
 3.3
 6.3

(1)Based on gross book value.
(2)Excludes two properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment.

Triple-Net Leased Properties

Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to

comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 2019. If Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Brookdale Senior Living Leases

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 121 consolidated properties (excluding two properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements and included in the senior living operations reportable business segment) to Brookdale Senior Living.

Pursuant to our lease agreement, Brookdale Senior Living is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Brookdale Senior Living, including a reduction for an annual rent credit equal to $7.0 million, was approximately $182.8 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)) due to us from Brookdale Senior Living was approximately $184.1 million.

Ardent Lease

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 10 properties (excluding one MOB leased to Ardent under a separate lease) to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Per our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option.

As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Ardent was approximately $120.9 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Ardent was also approximately $120.9 million.

Our 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint one of 11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.

Kindred Master Leases

As of December 31, 2019, we leased 29 properties to Kindred pursuant to a master lease agreement. In November 2016, Kindred extended the lease term to 2025 for all of our LTACs operated by Kindred that were scheduled to mature in 2018 and 2020, at the current rent level.

The aggregate annual rent we receive under each Kindred master lease is referred to as “base rent.” Base rent escalates annually at a specified rate over the prior period base rent, contingent, in some cases, upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters. The annual rent escalator under the Kindred master lease for 25 properties is based on year-over-year changes in CPI, subject to a floor and cap, and is 2.7% for four properties. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate 2020 contractual cash rent due to us from Kindred was approximately $127.4 million, and the current aggregate contractual base rent (computed in accordance with GAAP) due to us from Kindred was approximately $129.4 million. 

Senior Living Operations

As of December 31, 2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 260 consolidated seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements with us. Under these management agreements, the operators receive annual base management fees ranging from 4.5% to 7% of revenues generated by the applicable properties and, in some cases, additional management fees based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring between 2024 and 2027, and our management agreements with Sunrise have terms expiring between 2030 and 2038. In some cases, our management agreements include renewal provisions.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to customary rights and protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.
Competition

We generally compete for investments in seniors housing and healthcare assets with publicly traded, private and non-listed healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition challenges our ability to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives, which is affected by, among other factors, the availability of suitable acquisition or investment targets, our ability to negotiate acceptable transaction terms and our access to and cost of capital. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our tenants, operators and managers also compete on a local and regional basis with other healthcare operating companies that provide comparable services. Seniors housing community, SNF and health systems operators compete to attract and retain residents and patients to our properties based on scope and quality of care, reputation and financial condition, price, location and physical appearance of the properties, services offered, qualified personnel, physician referrals and family preferences. With respect to MOBs, we and our third-party managers compete to attract and retain tenants based on many of the same factors, in addition to quality of the affiliated health system, physician preferences and proximity to hospital campuses. The ability of our tenants, operators and managers to compete successfully could be affected by private, federal and state reimbursement programs and other laws and regulations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement” and “—Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Employees

As of December 31, 2019, we had 516 employees, none of which is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that relations with our employees are positive.

Insurance

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. We believe that the amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and the policies required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers are customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. Although we regularly monitor our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ compliance with their respective insurance requirements, we cannot assure you that they will maintain the required insurance coverages, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants, operators and managers to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. We also cannot assure you that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance coverage under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance coverage will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses related to our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we assure you of the future financial viability of the insurers.

We maintain the property insurance for all of our senior living operations, as well as the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations managed by Atria. However, Sunrise maintains the general and professional liability insurance for our seniors housing communities and related operations that it manages in accordance with the terms of our management agreements. Under our management agreements with Sunrise, we may elect, on an annual basis, whether we or Sunrise will bear responsibility for maintaining the required insurance coverage for the applicable properties.

Through our office operations, we provide engineering, construction and architectural services in connection with new development projects, and any design, construction or systems failures related to the properties we develop could result in substantial injury or damage to our clients or third parties. Any such injury or damage claims may arise in the ordinary course and may be asserted with respect to ongoing or completed projects. Although we maintain liability insurance to protect us against these claims, if any claim results in a loss, we cannot assure you that our policy limits would be adequate to cover the loss in full. If we sustain losses in excess of our insurance coverage, we may be required to pay the difference and we could lose our investment in, or experience reduced profits and cash flows from, the affected MOB or research and innovation center, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less coverage than a traditional insurance policy. As a result, companies that self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. The implementation of a trust or captive by any of our tenants, operators or managers could adversely affect such person’s ability to satisfy its obligations under, or otherwise comply with the terms of, its respective lease, management and other agreements with us, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Likewise, if we decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses that we incur could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Additional Information

We maintain a website at www.ventasreit.com. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

We make available, free of charge, through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, our Guidelines on Governance, our Global Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (including waivers from and amendments to that document) and the charters for each of our Audit and Compliance, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Committees are available on our website, and we will mail copies of the foregoing documents to stockholders, free of charge, upon request to our Corporate Secretary at Ventas, Inc., 353 North Clark Street, Suite 3300, Chicago, Illinois 60654.


GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION

Healthcare Regulation

Overview

Our tenants, operators and managers are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to quality of care, licensure and certificate of need, government reimbursement, fraud and abuse practices, qualifications of personnel, adequacy of plant and equipment, and other laws and regulations governing the operation of healthcare facilities. Healthcare is a highly regulated industry and that trend will, in general, continue in the future. The applicable rules are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants, operators and managers to civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions, including: the possible loss of accreditation or license; denial of reimbursement; imposition of fines; suspension, decertification, or exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs; or facility closure. Changes in laws or regulations, reimbursement policies, enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by tenants, operators and managers can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A shift toward less comprehensive health coverage facilitated by current presidential administration regulation and new Medicaid waiver programs has the potential to reduce the number of people with health insurance coverage. Additionally, coverage expansions via the Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”) through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back by litigation that may strike some or all of the ACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of people with Medicaid in a given state.Beyond this, significant changes to commercial health insurance and government sponsored insurance (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) remain possible. Commercial and government payors, are likely to continue imposing greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon operators, through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on certain of our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

Licensure, Certification and CONs

In general, the operators of our inpatient rehabilitation and long-term acute care facilities, health systems and skilled nursing facilities (collectively “healthcare facilities”) must be licensed and periodically certified through various regulatory agencies that determine compliance with federal, state and local laws to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Legal requirements pertaining to such licensure and certification relate to the quality of medical care provided by the operator, qualifications of the operator’s administrative personnel and clinical staff, adequacy of the physical plant and equipment and continuing compliance with applicable laws and regulations. A loss of licensure or certification could adversely affect a healthcare facility operator’s ability to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which, in turn, could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us.

In addition, many of our healthcare facilities are subject to state certificate of need (“CON”) laws that require governmental approval prior to the development or expansion of healthcare facilities and services. The approval process in these states generally requires a facility to demonstrate the need for additional or expanded healthcare facilities or services. CONs, where applicable, are also sometimes necessary for changes in ownership or control of licensed facilities, addition of beds, investment in major capital equipment, introduction of new services or termination of services previously approved through the CON process. CON laws and regulations may restrict an operator’s ability to expand our properties and grow its business in certain circumstances, which could have an adverse effect on the operator’s revenues and, in turn, its ability to make rental payments under and otherwise comply with the terms of our leases. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compared to healthcare facilities, seniors housing communities (other than those that receive Medicaid payments) do not receive significant funding from governmental healthcare programs and are subject to relatively few, if any, federal regulations. Instead, to the extent they are regulated, such regulation consists primarily of state and local laws governing licensure, provision of services, staffing requirements and other operational matters, which vary greatly from one jurisdiction to another. Although recent growth in the U.S. seniors housing industry has attracted the attention of various federal agencies that believe more federal regulation of these properties is necessary, Congress thus far has deferred to state regulation of seniors

housing communities. However, as a result of this growth and increased federal scrutiny, some states have revised and strengthened their regulation of seniors housing communities, and more states are expected to do the same in the future.

As discussed in greater detail below, a number of states have instituted Medicaid waiver programs that blend the functions of healthcare and custodial care providers, and expand the scope of services that can be provided under certain licenses. The trend toward this kind of experimentation is likely to continue, and even hasten, under Republican leadership. The temporary and experimental nature of these programs means that states will also continue to adjust their licensing and certification processes which might result in some providers facing increased competition and others facing new requirements.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

Healthcare facilities and seniors housing communities that receive Medicaid payments are subject to various complex federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibit fraudulent and abusive business practices. These laws and regulations include, among others:

Federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit healthcare providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental healthcare programs;

Federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment, receipt or solicitation of any remuneration to induce referrals of patients for items or services covered by a governmental healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid;

Federal and state physician self-referral laws, including the federal Stark Law, which generally prohibits physicians from referring patients enrolled in certain governmental healthcare programs to providers of certain designated health services in which the referring physician or an immediate family member of the referring physician has an ownership or other financial interest;

The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to impose civil penalties administratively for fraudulent acts; and

State and federal data privacy and security laws, including the privacy and security rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information.

Violating these healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations may result in criminal and civil penalties, such as punitive sanctions, damage assessments, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments, and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The responsibility for enforcing these laws and regulations lies with a variety or federal, state and local governmental agencies, however many of the laws and regulations can also be enforced by private litigants through federal and state false claims acts and other laws that allow private individuals to bring whistleblower suits known as qui tam actions.

Congress has significantly increased funding to the governmental agencies charged with enforcing the healthcare fraud and abuse laws to facilitate increased audits, investigations and prosecutions of providers suspected of healthcare fraud. As a result, government investigations and enforcement actions brought against healthcare providers have increased significantly in recent years and are expected to continue. A violation of federal or state anti-fraud and abuse laws or regulations by an operator of our properties could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect its ability to satisfy its contractual obligations, including making rental payments under and otherwise complying with the terms of our leases.

The current presidential administration has signaled it will expand current efforts to enforce healthcare fraud and abuse laws by increasing funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control program. Additionally, government officials within HHS and the U.S. Department of Justice have stated that they will make it a high priority to prosecute fraud and abuse in federal claims. Further, many state Medicaid programs continue to devote additional resources to fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives. Medicaid reform plans might include lowering the growth rate of Medicaid spending, which will put pressure on states to exert greater scrutiny over the utilization of services. It is likely that states will have increased flexibility and incentive to monitor utilization patterns and take action against outlier providers.


Medicare’s fraud, waste, and abuse initiatives continue to be refined and refocused. Moratoria on new home health providers obtaining Medicare provider status and higher fees for labs show that the federal government will take actions to contain the number of providers that can bill Medicare in areas where wasteful billing is believed to exist. The current administration has proposed expanding the extrapolated methods of the Recovery Audit Contractor program, which has recovered more than $2 billion for the Medicare program, into the Medicare Advantage program. Further expansion of these larger finding audits may be implemented in the future.

Reimbursement

The majority of SNF reimbursement, and a significant percentage of health system, IRF and LTAC reimbursement, is through Medicare and Medicaid. Medical buildings and other healthcare related properties have provider tenants that participate in Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are often their largest source of funding. Seniors housing communities generally do not receive funding from Medicare or Medicaid, but their ability to retain their residents is impacted by policy decisions and initiatives established by the administrators of Medicare and Medicaid. The passage of the ACA in 2010 allowed formerly uninsured Americans to acquire coverage and utilize additional health care services. In addition, the ACA gave new authorities to implement Medicaid waiver and pilot programs that impact healthcare and long term custodial care reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid. These activities promote “aging in place”, allowing senior citizens to stay longer in seniors housing communities, and diverting or delaying their admission into SNFs. The potential risks that accompany these regulatory and market changes are discussed below.

As a result of the ACA, and specifically Medicaid expansion and establishment of health insurance exchanges providing subsidized health insurance, an estimated seventeen million more Americans have health insurance than in 2010. These newly-insured Americans utilize services delivered by providers at medical buildings and other healthcare facilities. The ACA was nearly repealed in 2017 and the current presidential administration continues to promulgate regulations to encourage the purchase of less comprehensive forms of health insurance for individuals and families unable to purchase health insurance on their own. In addition, the continued litigation regarding Texas v Azar may result in some or all of the ACA being invalidated. Such a determination could leave uninsured the roughly twenty million people currently covered by health insurance exchange qualified plans or by Medicaid expansion.

Enabled by the Medicare Modernization Act (2003) and subsequent laws, Medicare and Medicaid have implemented pilot programs (officially termed demonstrations or models) to “divert” elderly from SNFs and promote “aging in place” in “the least restrictive environment.” Several states have implemented home and community-based Medicaid waiver programs that increase the support services available to senior citizens in senior housing, lengthening the time that many seniors can live outside of a SNF. These Medicaid waiver programs are subject to re-approval and pilots are time-limited. The current presidential administration is not necessarily opposed to these efforts, but is committed to giving states greater control of their Medicaid programs. The current administration has also approved several community engagement waivers that, based on the first implemented waiver in Arkansas, may result in tens thousands of people losing Medicaid coverage. The results of these reforms could be the modification or curtailment of a number of existing pilots and the number of people covered by Medicaid.

CMS is currently in the midst of transitioning Medicare from a traditional fee-for-service reimbursement model to capitated and value-based approaches in which the government pays a set amount for each beneficiary for a defined period of time, based on that person’s underlying medical needs, rather than the actual services provided. The result is increasing use of management tools to oversee individual providers and coordinate their services. This puts downward pressure on the number and expense of services provided. Roughly 10 million Medicare beneficiaries now receive care via accountable care organizations, and another 21 million are enrolled in Medicare Advantage health plans. The continued trend toward capitated and value-based approaches - particularly Medicare Advantage, which is expected to grow under the current presidential administration - has the potential to diminish the market for certain healthcare providers, particularly specialist physicians and providers of particular diagnostic technologies such as medical resonance imaging services. This could adversely impact the medical properties that house these physicians and medical technology providers.


The majority of Medicare payments continue to be made through traditional Medicare Part A and Part B fee-for-service schedules. Medicare’s payment regulations, particularly with respect to certain hospitals, skilled nursing care, and home health services have resulted in lower net pay increases than providers of those services often desire. In addition, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 establishes a multi-year transition into pay-for-quality approaches for Medicare physicians and other providers. This will include payment reductions for providers who do not meet government quality standards. The implementation of pay-for-quality models is expected to produce funding disparities that could adversely impact some provider tenants in MOBs and other health care properties.

In 2019, federal regulators took a number of steps that could impact the operation of SNFs. For example, the federal government now publicly posts a large number of SNFs that are suspected of providing substandard care. A regulation proposed at the end of 2019, if finalized as proposed, would curb state provider taxes and fees that leverage the federal Medicaid match to deliver greater net funding to institutional provider such as SNFs. Moves to further regulate SNFs in 2020 are possible.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 7.3% of our total revenues and 13.3% of our total NOI (in each case excluding amounts in discontinued operations) were attributable to acute and post-acute healthcare facilities in which our third-party tenants receive reimbursement for their services under governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We are neither a participant in, nor a direct recipient of, any reimbursement under these programs with respect to those leased facilities.

Research and Innovation Centers

In 2016, we entered the research and innovation sector through the acquisitions of substantially all of the university affiliated research and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. The research and innovation tenants of these assets are largely university-affiliated organizations. These university-affiliated research and innovation tenants are dependent on government funding to varying degrees. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and capital, in part because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance. Therefore, our tenants in the research and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

Some of our research and innovation tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the federal government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant’s research and innovation operation may be adversely affected or fail. Further, the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products requires federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain. Even after a research and innovation tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance for a product, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products and the expiration of patent protection for the product. Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and government reimbursement policies, including changes under the current presidential administration or by private healthcare payors. Likewise, our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. If our research and innovation tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental Regulation

As an owner of real property, we are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters.

These laws and regulations address, among other things, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, fuel oil management, wastewater discharges, air emissions, radioactive materials, medical wastes, and hazardous wastes, and, in certain cases, the costs of complying with these laws and regulations and the penalties for non-compliance can be substantial. With respect to our properties that are operated or managed by third parties, we may be held primarily or jointly and severally liable for costs relating to the investigation and clean-up of any property from which there is or has been an actual or threatened release of a regulated material and any other affected properties, regardless of whether we knew of or caused the release. Such costs typically are not limited by law or regulation and could exceed the property’s value. In addition, we may be liable for certain other costs, such as governmental fines and injuries to persons, property or natural resources, as a result of any such actual or threatened release. See “Risk Factors-Risks Arising from Our Business-We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of

our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Under the terms of our lease, management and other agreements, we generally have a right to indemnification by the tenants, operators and managers of our properties for any contamination caused by them. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants, operators and managers will have the financial capability or willingness to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness to do so may require us to satisfy the underlying environmental claims.

In general, we have also agreed to indemnify our tenants and operators against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean-up costs) resulting from any condition arising in, on or under, or relating to, the leased properties at any time before the applicable lease commencement date. With respect to our senior living operating portfolio, we have agreed to indemnify our managers against any environmental claims (including penalties and clean- up costs) resulting from any condition on those properties, unless the manager caused or contributed to that condition.

We did not make any material capital expenditures in connection with environmental, health, and safety laws, ordinances and regulations in 2019 and do not expect that we will be required to make any such material capital expenditures during 2020.    

Canada

In Canada, seniors housing communities are currently generally subject to significantly less regulation than skilled nursing facilities and hospitals, and the regulation of such facilities is principally a matter of provincial and municipal jurisdiction. As a result, the regulatory regimes that apply to seniors housing communities vary depending on the province (and in certain circumstances, the city) in which a facility is located. Recently, certain Canadian provinces have taken steps to implement regulatory measures that could result in enhanced regulation for seniors housing communities in such provinces.

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

This section discusses the most significant factors that affect our business, operations and financial condition. It does not describe all risks and uncertainties applicable to us, our industry or ownership of our securities. If any of the following risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that are not addressed below or that we have not yet identified, actually occur, we could be materially adversely affected and the value of our securities could decline.

We have grouped these risk factors into three general categories:

Risks arising from our business;

Risks arising from our capital structure; and

Risks arising from our status as a REIT.

Risks Arising from Our Business

The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

As of December 31, 2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, managed 260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities pursuant to long-term management agreements. These properties represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, we rely on Atria’s and Sunrise’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financial results for our properties in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. For example, we depend on Atria’s and Sunrise’s ability to attract and retain skilled management personnel who are responsible for the day-to-day operations of our seniors housing communities. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force Atria or Sunrise to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added

costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. Any increase in labor costs and other property operating expenses, any failure by Atria or Sunrise to attract and retain qualified personnel, or significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or equity ownership could adversely affect the income we receive from our seniors housing communities and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, any adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could impair its ability to manage our properties efficiently and effectively and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. If Atria or Sunrise experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, any one or a combination of which indirectly could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and NOI, and we depend on Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred to pay all insurance, taxes, utilities and maintenance and repair expenses in connection with the leased properties and properties that are collateral for the loans. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, any failure by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to effectively conduct its operations or to maintain and improve such properties could adversely affect its business reputation and its ability to attract and retain patients and residents in such properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable them to satisfy their respective indemnification obligations.

We face potential adverse consequences from the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our tenants, operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.

We lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers. We are also a direct or indirect lender to various tenants and operators.  We have very limited control over the success or failure of our tenants’ and operators’ businesses and, at any time, a tenant or operator may experience a downturn in its business that weakens its financial condition. If that happens, the tenant or operator may fail to make its payments to us when due. Although our lease, loan and management agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us, we may determine not to do so if we believe that enforcement of our rights would be more detrimental to our business than seeking alternative approaches.

A downturn in any of our tenants’ or operators’ businesses could ultimately lead to bankruptcy if it is unable to timely resolve the underlying causes, which may be largely outside of its control. Bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or, at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies and realize any recoveries in connection therewith. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing.

A debtor-lessee may reject our lease in a bankruptcy proceeding, in which case our claim against the debtor-lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a debtor-lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that our lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement, in which case our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, generally would be more limited. If a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new tenant, operator or manager.


Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings may also result in increased costs to the operator and significant management distraction. If we are unable to transition affected properties, they could experience prolonged operational disruption, leading to lower occupancy rates and further depressed revenues. Publicity about the operator’s financial condition and insolvency proceedings may also negatively impact their and our reputations, decreasing customer demand and revenues. Any or all of these risks could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. These risks would be magnified where we lease multiple properties to a single operator under a master lease, as an operator failure or default under a master lease would expose us to these risks across multiple properties.

We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.

We are parties to long-term management agreements pursuant to which Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 260 of our consolidated seniors housing communities as of December 31, 2019. Most of our management agreements with Atria have terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods, and most of our management agreements with Sunrise have terms ranging from 25 to 30 years (which commenced as early as 2004 and as recently as 2012). Our ability to terminate these long-term management agreements is limited to specific circumstances set forth in the agreements and may relate to all properties or a specific property or group of properties.

We may terminate any of our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise upon the occurrence of an event of default by the operator in the performance of a material covenant or term thereof (including, in certain circumstances, the revocation of any license or certificate necessary for operation), subject in most cases to such operator’s right to cure such default, or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events relating to such operator. In addition, we may terminate our management agreements with Atria based on their failure to achieve certain NOI targets or upon the payment of a fee. We also may terminate most of our management agreements with Sunrise based on the failure to achieve certain NOI targets, subject to certain rights of Sunrise to make cure payments to us, and upon the occurrence of certain other events or the existence of certain other conditions.

We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate the Atria or Sunrise management agreements for any reason or such agreements are not renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected properties with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional seniors housing operators would be interested in managing our seniors housing communities, we cannot assure you that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we are successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the properties effectively. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager would require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, the mortgage lenders for the properties, and we cannot assure you that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or a lengthy delay in replacing, Atria or Sunrise as the manager of our seniors housing communities following termination or non-renewal of the applicable management agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases beyond their current term. If our leases with Brookdale Senior Living or Ardent, the Kindred master leases or any of our other triple-net leases are not renewed, we would attempt to reposition those properties with another tenant or operator. In case of non-renewal, we generally have one year prior to expiration of the lease term to arrange for repositioning of the properties and our tenants are required to continue to perform all of their obligations (including the payment of all rental amounts) for the non-renewed assets until such expiration. However, following expiration of a lease term or if we exercise our right to replace a tenant or operator in default, rental payments on the related properties could decline or cease altogether while we reposition the properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator. We also might not be successful in identifying suitable replacements or entering into leases or other arrangements with new tenants or operators on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us as our current leases, if at all, and we may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations (e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses) to preserve the value of, and avoid the imposition of liens on, our properties while they are being repositioned. In addition, we may incur certain obligations and liabilities, including obligations to indemnify the replacement tenant or operator, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In the event of non-renewal or a tenant default, our ability to reposition our properties with a suitable replacement tenant or operator could be significantly delayed or limited by state licensing, receivership, CON or other laws, as well as by the Medicare and Medicaid change-of-ownership rules, and we could incur substantial additional expenses in connection with any licensing, receivership or change-of-ownership proceedings. Our ability to locate and attract suitable replacement tenants also could be impaired by the specialized healthcare uses or contractual restrictions on use of the properties, and we may be forced to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any such delays, limitations and expenses could adversely impact our ability to collect rent, obtain possession of leased properties or otherwise exercise remedies for tenant default and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Moreover, in connection with certain of our properties, we have entered into intercreditor agreements with the tenants’ lenders or tri-party agreements with our lenders. Our ability to exercise remedies under the applicable leases or management agreements or to reposition the applicable properties may be significantly delayed or limited by the terms of the intercreditor agreement or tri-party agreement. Any such delay or limit on our rights and remedies could adversely affect our ability to mitigate our losses and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Merger and acquisition activity or consolidation in the seniors housing and healthcare industries resulting in a change of control of, or a competitor’s investment in, one or more of our tenants, operators or managers could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The seniors housing and healthcare industries have recently experienced increased consolidation, including among owners of real estate and care providers. We compete with other healthcare REITs, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, private equity firms and other investors that pursue a variety of investments, which may include investments in our tenants, operators or managers. A competitor’s investment in one of our tenants, operators or managers could enable our competitor to influence that tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s business and strategy in a manner that impairs our relationship with the tenant, operator or manager or is otherwise adverse to our interests. Depending on our contractual agreements and the specific facts and circumstances, we may have the right to consent to, or otherwise exercise rights and remedies, including termination rights, on account of, a competitor’s investment in, a change of control of, or other transactions impacting a tenant, operator or manager. In deciding whether to exercise our rights and remedies, including termination rights, we assess numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In addition, in connection with any change of control of a tenant, operator or manager, the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s management team may change, which could lead to a change in the tenant’s, operator’s or manager’s strategy or adversely affect the business of the tenant, operator or manager, either of which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Market conditions, including, but not limited to, interest rates and credit spreads, the availability of credit and the actual and perceived state of the real estate markets and public capital markets generally could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The markets in which we operate are affected by a number of factors that are largely beyond our control but may nevertheless have a significant negative impact on us. These factors include, but are not limited to:

Interest rates and credit spreads; 

The availability of credit, including the price, terms and conditions under which it can be obtained; and

The actual and perceived state of the real estate market, the market for dividend-paying stocks and public capital markets in general.

In addition, increased inflation may have a pronounced negative impact on the interest expense we pay in connection with our outstanding indebtedness and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our rents.

Deflation may result in a decline in general price levels, often caused by a decrease in the supply of money or credit. The predominant effects of deflation are high unemployment, credit contraction and weakened consumer demand. Restricted lending practices may impact our ability to obtain financing for our properties, which could adversely impact our growth and profitability.


Our ongoing strategy depends, in part, upon future investments in and acquisitions of, or our development or redevelopment of, seniors housing and healthcare assets, and we may not be successful in identifying and consummating these transactions.

An important part of our business strategy is to continue to expand and diversify our portfolio through accretive acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities in domestic and international seniors housing and healthcare properties. Our execution of this strategy by successfully identifying, securing and consummating beneficial transactions is made more challenging by increased competition and can be affected by many factors, including our relationships with current and prospective clients, our ability to obtain debt and equity capital at costs comparable to or better than our competitors and lower than the yield we earn on our acquisitions or investments, and our ability to negotiate favorable terms with property owners seeking to sell and other contractual counterparties. Our competitors for these opportunities include other healthcare REITs, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers, healthcare lenders and other investors, including developers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, government-sponsored entities and private equity firms, some of whom may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital than we do. See “Business—Competition” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If we are unsuccessful at identifying and capitalizing on investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment opportunities, our growth and profitability may be adversely affected.

Investments in and acquisitions of seniors housing and healthcare properties entail risks associated with real estate investments generally, including risks that the investment will not achieve expected returns, that the cost estimates for necessary property improvements will prove inaccurate or that the tenant, operator or manager will fail to meet performance expectations. Investments outside the United States raise legal, economic and market risks associated with doing business in foreign countries, such as currency exchange fluctuations, costly regulatory requirements and foreign tax risks. Domestic and international real estate development and redevelopment projects present additional risks, including construction delays or cost overruns that increase expenses, the inability to obtain required zoning, occupancy and other governmental approvals and permits on a timely basis, and the incurrence of significant costs prior to completion of the project. Furthermore, healthcare properties are often highly customized and the development or redevelopment of such properties may require costly tenant-specific improvements. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve the economic benefit we expect from acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment opportunities.

Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations.

We have made and expect to continue to make significant acquisitions and investments as part of our overall business strategy. Our significant acquisition and investment activity presents certain risks to our business and operations, including, among other things, that:

We may be unable to successfully integrate the operations, personnel or systems of acquired companies, maintain consistent standards, controls, policies and procedures, or realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other investments within the anticipated time frame or at all;

We may be unable to effectively monitor and manage our expanded portfolio of properties, retain key employees or attract highly qualified new employees;

Projections of estimated future revenues, costs savings or operating metrics that we develop during the due diligence and integration planning process might be inaccurate;

Our leverage could increase or our per share financial results could decline if we incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance acquisitions and investments;

Acquisitions and other new investments could divert management’s attention from our existing assets;

The value of acquired assets or the market price of our common stock may decline; and

We may be unable to continue paying dividends at the current rate.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate acquisitions and investments without encountering difficulties or that any such difficulties will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


If the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions, including indemnification obligations in favor of third parties, are greater than expected, or if there are unknown liabilities, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

We may assume or incur liabilities in connection with our acquisitions, including, in some cases, contingent liabilities. As we integrate these acquisitions, we may learn additional information about the sellers, the properties, their operations and their liabilities that adversely affects us, such as:

Liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;

Unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the sellers;

Liabilities, claims and litigation, including indemnification obligations, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to or following our acquisition;

Claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the sellers; and

Liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

As a result, we cannot assure you that our past or future acquisitions will be successful or will not, in fact, harm our business. Among other things, if the liabilities we assume in connection with acquisitions are greater than expected, or if we discover obligations relating to the acquired properties or businesses of which we were not aware at the time of acquisition, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, we have now, and may have in the future, certain surviving indemnification obligations in favor of third parties under the terms of acquisition agreements to which we are a party.  Most of these indemnification obligations will be capped as to amount and survival period, and we do not believe that these obligations will be material in the aggregate.  However, there can be no assurances as to the ultimate amount of such obligations or whether such obligations will have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our future results will suffer if we do not effectively manage the expansion of our health system and research and innovation portfolios and operations following the acquisition of AHS and the Research and Innovation Acquisition.

As a result of our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. (“AHS”) in 2015, we entered into the health system sector. Also, as a result of the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated research and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) in 2016 (the “Research and Innovation Acquisition”), we entered into the university-affiliated research and innovation sector. Part of our long-term business strategy involves expanding our health system and research and innovation portfolios through additional acquisitions and development of new properties. Both the asset management of our existing health systems and university-affiliated research and innovation centers portfolios and such additional acquisitions and developments may involve complex challenges. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to manage our expansion opportunities, integrate new investments into our existing business in an efficient and timely manner, successfully monitor the operations, costs, regulatory compliance and service quality of our operators and leverage our relationships with Ardent and other operators of health systems and Wexford and other operators and developers of research and innovation centers. It is possible that our expansion or acquisition opportunities within the health system and research and innovation sectors will not be successful, which could adversely impact our growth and future results.

Our investments are concentrated in seniors housing and healthcare real estate, making us more vulnerable economically to adverse changes in the real estate market and the seniors housing and healthcare industries than if our investments were diversified.

We invest primarily in seniors housing and healthcare properties and are constrained by the terms of our existing indebtedness from making investments outside those industries. This investment focus exposes us to greater economic risk than if our portfolio were to include real estate assets in other industries or assets unrelated to real estate.

The healthcare industry is highly regulated, and changes in government regulation and reimbursement can have material adverse consequences on its participants, some of which may be unintended. The healthcare industry is also highly competitive, and our operators and managers may encounter increased competition for residents and patients, including with respect to the scope and quality of care and services provided, reputation and financial condition, physical appearance of the properties, price and location. Our tenants, operators and managers are large employers who compete for labor, making their results sensitive to changes in the labor market and/or wages and benefits offered to their employees. If our tenants, operators

and managers are unable to successfully compete with other operators and managers by maintaining profitable occupancy and rate levels or controlling labor costs, their ability to meet their respective obligations to us may be materially adversely affected. We cannot assure you that future changes in government regulation will not adversely affect the healthcare industry, including our seniors housing and healthcare operations, tenants and operators, nor can we be certain that our tenants, operators and managers will achieve and maintain occupancy and rate levels or labor costs levels that will enable them to satisfy their obligations to us. Any adverse changes in the regulation of the healthcare industry, or the competitiveness of our tenants, operators and managers, or costs of labor, could have a more pronounced effect on us than if we had investments outside the seniors housing and healthcare industries.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and our ability to quickly sell or exchange our properties in response to changes in economic or other conditions is limited. In the event we market any of our properties for sale, the value of those properties and our ability to sell at prices or on terms acceptable to us could be adversely affected by a downturn in the real estate industry or any economic weakness in the seniors housing and healthcare industries. In addition, transfers of healthcare properties may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial properties. We cannot assure you that we will recognize the full value of any property that we sell for liquidity or other reasons, and the inability to respond quickly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operating assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could adversely affect our ability to generate revenues or increase our costs and could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our senior living operating assets and office assets expose us to various operational risks, liabilities and claims that could increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to generate revenues, thereby reducing our profitability. These operational risks include fluctuations in occupancy levels, the inability to achieve economic resident fees (including anticipated increases in those fees), increases in the cost of food, materials, energy, labor (as a result of unionization or otherwise) or other services, rent control regulations, national and regional economic conditions, the imposition of new or increased taxes, capital expenditure requirements, professional and general liability claims, and the availability and cost of professional and general liability insurance. Any one or a combination of these factors could result in operating deficiencies in our senior living operations or office operations reportable business segments, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our ownership of properties outside the United States exposes us to different risks than those associated with our domestic properties.

Our current or future ownership of properties outside the United States subjects us to risks that may be different or greater than those we face with our domestic properties. These risks include, but are not limited to:

Challenges with respect to repatriation of foreign earnings and cash;

Foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries in which we own properties;

Regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;

Challenges of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings;

Differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; and

Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Increased construction and development in the markets in which our seniors housing communities and MOBs are located could adversely affect our future occupancy rates, operating margins and profitability.

Limited barriers to entry in the seniors housing and MOB industries could lead to the development of new seniors housing communities or MOBs that outpaces demand. Data published by the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care has indicated deliveries of new seniors housing communities will remain at elevated levels in 2019, especially in certain geographic markets. If development outpaces demand for those assets in the markets in which our properties are located, those markets may become saturated and we could experience decreased occupancy, reduced operating margins and lower profitability, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We have now, and may have in the future, exposure to contingent rent escalators, which could hinder our growth and profitability.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from leasing properties pursuant to long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates, subject to annual escalations. In certain cases, the annual escalations are contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue parameters or based on changes in CPI, with caps and floors. If, as a result of weak economic conditions or other factors, the properties subject to these leases do not generate sufficient revenue to achieve the specified rent escalation parameters or CPI does not increase, our growth and profitability may be hindered. If strong economic conditions result in significant increases in CPI, but the escalations under our leases are capped, our growth and profitability also may be limited.

We own certain properties subject to ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements that limit our uses of the properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer the properties and expose us to loss of the properties if such agreements are breached by us or terminated.

Our investments in MOBs and other properties may be made through leasehold interests in the land on which the buildings are located, leases of air rights for the space above the land on which the buildings are located, or other similar restrictive arrangements. Many of these ground lease, air rights and other restrictive agreements impose significant limitations on our uses of the subject properties, restrict our ability to sell or otherwise transfer our interests in the properties or restrict the leasing of the properties. These restrictions may limit our ability to timely sell or exchange the properties, impair the properties’ value or negatively impact our ability to find suitable tenants for the properties. In addition, we could lose our interests in the subject properties if the ground lease, air rights or other restrictive agreements are breached by us or terminated.

We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our loans and other investments, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully sell any acquired equity interests or reposition any acquired properties, which could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

If a borrower defaults under mortgage or other secured loans for which we are the lender, we may attempt to foreclose on the collateral securing those loans, including by acquiring any pledged equity interests or acquiring title to the subject properties, to protect our investment. In response, the defaulting borrower may contest our enforcement of foreclosure or other available remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other available remedies, or bring claims against us for lender liability. If a defaulting borrower seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing foreclosure or other available remedies against the borrower unless relief is first obtained from the court with jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In addition, we may be subject to intercreditor or tri-party agreements that delay, impact, govern or limit our ability to foreclose on a lien securing a loan or otherwise delay or limit our pursuit of our rights and remedies. Any such delay or limit on our ability to pursue our rights or remedies could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Even if we successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our mortgage loans and other investments, costs related to enforcement of our remedies, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the collateral could prevent us from realizing the full amount of our secured loans, and we could be required to record a valuation allowance for such losses. Moreover, the collateral may include equity interests that we are unable to sell due to securities law restrictions or otherwise, or properties that we are unable to reposition with new tenants or operators on a timely basis, if at all, or without making improvements or repairs. Any delay or costs incurred in selling or repositioning acquired collateral could adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

Some of our loan investments are subordinated to loans held by third parties.

Our mezzanine loan investments are subordinated to senior secured loans held by other investors that encumber the same real estate. If a senior secured loan is foreclosed, that foreclosure would extinguish our rights in the collateral for our mezzanine loan. In order to protect our economic interest in that collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to advance funds to the senior lenders in order to cure defaults under the senior secured loans and prevent such a foreclosure. If a senior secured loan has matured or has been accelerated, then in order to protect our economic interest in the collateral, we would need to be prepared, on an expedited basis, to purchase or pay off that senior secured loan, which could require an infusion of fresh capital as large or larger than our initial investment. Our ability to sell or syndicate a mezzanine loan could be limited by transfer restrictions in the intercreditor agreement with the senior secured lenders. Our ability to negotiate modifications to the mezzanine loan documents with our borrowers could be limited by restrictions on modifications in the intercreditor agreement. Since mezzanine loans are typically secured by pledges of equity rather than direct liens on real

estate, our mezzanine loan investments are more vulnerable than our mortgage loan investments to losses caused by competing creditor claims, unauthorized transfers, or bankruptcies.

Our tenants, operators and managers may be adversely affected by healthcare regulation and enforcement.

Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. This is particularly true for large for-profit, multi-facility providers like Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, ownership of facilities, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, prices for services, qualified beneficiaries, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers and the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of research and innovation products. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the scope of future federal, state and local regulations and legislation, including the Medicare and Medicaid statutes and regulations, or the intensity of enforcement efforts with respect to such regulations and legislation, and any changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on our tenants, operators and managers, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If our tenants, operators and managers fail to comply with the extensive laws, regulations and other requirements applicable to their businesses and the operation of our properties, they could become ineligible to receive reimbursement from governmental and private third-party payor programs, face bans on admissions of new patients or residents, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to their operations. Our tenants, operators and managers also could face increased costs related to changes in healthcare regulation, such as a shift toward less comprehensive health coverage, or be forced to expend considerable resources in responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under applicable laws or regulations. In such event, the results of operations and financial condition of our tenants, operators and managers and the results of operations of our properties operated or managed by those entities could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from third-party payors, including insurance companies and the Medicare and Medicaid programs, could have a material adverse effect on certain of our tenants and operators and on us.

Certain of our tenants and operators rely on reimbursement from third-party payors, including the Medicare (both traditional Medicare and "managed" Medicare/Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid programs, for substantially all of their revenues. Federal and state legislators and regulators have adopted or proposed various cost-containment measures that would limit payments to healthcare providers, and budget crises and financial shortfalls have caused states to implement or consider Medicaid rate freezes or cuts. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Private third-party payors also have continued their efforts to control healthcare costs. In addition, coverage expansions via the ACA through Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges may be scaled back by litigation that may invalidate some or all of the ACA, or waiver programs that reduce the number of people with Medicaid coverage in a given state. We cannot assure you that our tenants and operators who currently depend on governmental or private payor reimbursement will be adequately reimbursed for the services they provide. Significant limits by governmental and private third-party payors on the scope of services reimbursed or on reimbursement rates and fees, whether from legislation, administrative actions or private payor efforts, could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity, financial condition and results of operations of certain of our tenants and operators, which could affect adversely their ability to comply with the terms of our leases and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The healthcare industry trend away from a traditional fee for service reimbursement model towards value-based payment approaches may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ revenues and profitability.

Certain of our tenants, specifically those providers in the post-acute and health system space, are subject to the broad trend in the healthcare industry toward value-based purchasing of healthcare services. These value-based purchasing programs include public reporting of quality data and preventable adverse events tied to the quality and efficiency of care provided by facilities. Medicare no longer reimburses hospitals for care related to certain preventable adverse events and imposes payment reductions on hospitals for preventable readmissions. These punitive approaches could be expanded to additional types of providers in the future.

We expect value-based purchasing programs, including programs that condition reimbursement on patient outcome measures, to become more common and to involve a higher percentage of reimbursement amounts. For example, several of the nation’s largest commercial payors are increasing reliance on value-based reimbursement arrangements. We are unable at this time to predict how this trend will affect the revenues and profitability of those of our tenants who are providers of healthcare services; however, if this trend significantly and adversely affects their profitability, it could in turn negatively affect their ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

If controls imposed on certain of our tenants who provide healthcare services that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors to reduce admissions and length of stay affect inpatient volumes at our healthcare facilities, the financial condition or results of operations of those tenants could be adversely affected.

Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization reviews,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect certain of our healthcare facilities, specifically our acute care hospitals and post-acute facilities. Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by managed care plans. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payor pressures to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls and reductions are expected to continue, which could negatively impact the financial condition of our tenants who provide healthcare services in our hospitals and post-acute facilities. If so, this could adversely affect these tenants’ ability and willingness to comply with the terms of their leases with us and or renew those leases upon expiration, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

The hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their affiliated health systems could fail to remain competitive or financially viable, which could adversely impact their ability to attract physicians and physician groups to our MOBs.

Our MOB operations depend on the competitiveness and financial viability of the hospitals on or near whose campuses our MOBs are located and their ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients to our MOBs. The viability of these hospitals, in turn, depends on factors such as the quality and mix of healthcare services provided, competition for patients, physicians and physician groups, demographic trends in the surrounding community, market position and growth potential, as well as the ability of the affiliated health systems to provide economies of scale and access to capital. If a hospital on or near whose campus one of our MOBs is located fails or becomes unable to meet its financial obligations, and if an affiliated health system is unable to support that hospital, the hospital may be unable to compete successfully or could be forced to close or relocate, which could adversely impact its ability to attract physicians and other healthcare-related clients. Because we rely on proximity to and affiliations with hospitals to create leasing demand in our MOBs, a hospital’s inability to remain competitive or financially viable, or to attract physicians and physician groups, could materially adversely affect our MOB operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns.

We consider and, when appropriate, invest in various development and redevelopment projects. In deciding whether to make an investment in a particular project, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the property. Our assumptions are subject to risks generally associated with development and redevelopment projects, including, among others, that:

We may be unable to obtain financing for the project on favorable terms or at all;

We may not complete the project on schedule or within budgeted amounts;

We may not be able to recognize rental revenue in some cases although cash rent is being paid and the lease has commenced;

We may encounter delays in obtaining or fail to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, environmental and other governmental permits and authorizations, or underestimate the costs necessary to develop or redevelop the property to market standards;


Construction or other delays may provide tenants or residents the right to terminate preconstruction leases or cause us to incur additional costs;

Volatility in the price of construction materials or labor may increase our project costs;

In the case of our MOB developments, hospitals or health systems may maintain significant decision-making authority with respect to the development schedule;

Our builders may fail to perform or satisfy the expectations of our clients or prospective clients;

We may incorrectly forecast risks associated with development in new geographic regions;

Tenants may not lease space at the quantity or rental rate levels or on the schedule projected;

Demand for our project may decrease prior to completion, due to competition from other developments; and

Lease rates and rents at newly developed or redeveloped properties may fluctuate based on factors beyond our control, including market and economic conditions.

If any of the risks described above occur, our development and redevelopment projects, including projects undertaken through our joint ventures, may not yield anticipated returns, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 35 MOBs, 12 research and innovation centers, 38 seniors housing communities and one IRF through consolidated joint ventures, and we had 25% ownership interests in five seniors housing communities and one MOB through investments in unconsolidated entities. In addition, we had a 34% ownership interest in Atria, a 34% ownership interest in Eclipse Senior Living and a 9.8% interest in Ardent as of December 31, 2019. These joint ventures and unconsolidated entities involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

We may be unable to take actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the property or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the property;

For joint ventures in which we have a noncontrolling interest, our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;

Our ability to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;

Our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could delay construction or development of a property or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;

Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a property that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;

Disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and

We may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.


Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford daily resident fees at our seniors housing communities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.

Assisted and independent living services generally are not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A large majority of the resident fee revenues generated by our senior living operations, therefore, are derived from private pay sources consisting of the income or assets of residents or their family members. In light of the significant expense associated with building new properties and staffing and other costs of providing services, typically only seniors with income or assets that meet or exceed the comparable region median can afford the daily resident and care fees at our seniors housing communities, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If the managers of our seniors housing communities are unable to attract and retain seniors that have sufficient income, assets or other resources to pay the fees associated with assisted and independent living services, the occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations of our senior living operations could decline, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our tenants in the research and innovation industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

Research and innovation tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, including the following:

Some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. The economic environment in recent years has significantly impacted the ability of these companies to access the capital markets and venture capital funding. In addition, state and federal government and university budgets have been negatively impacted by the recent economic environment and, as a result certain programs, including grants related to biotechnology research and development, may be at risk of being eliminated or cut back significantly. If private investors, the government, universities, public markets or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, a tenant’s business may fail.

The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect our tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.

Our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.

Collaborative relationships with other research and innovation entities may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or marketing of our tenants’ products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.

Legislation to reform the U.S. healthcare system, including regulations and legislation relating to the ACA, may include government intervention in product pricing and other changes that adversely affect reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products. In addition, sales of many of our tenants’ marketable products are dependent, in large part, on the availability and extent of reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Changes in government regulations, price controls or third-party payors’ reimbursement policies may reduce reimbursement for our tenants’ marketable products and adversely impact our tenants’ businesses.

We cannot assure you that our tenants in the research and innovation industry will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The amount and scope of insurance coverage provided by our policies and policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers may not adequately insure against losses.

We maintain or require in our lease, management and other agreements that our tenants, operators and managers maintain all applicable lines of insurance on our properties and their operations. Although we regularly review the amount and scope of insurance provided by our policies and required to be maintained by our tenants, operators and managers and believe

the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry, we cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will continue to be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance. We also cannot assure you that we or our tenants, operators and managers will maintain the required coverages, that we will continue to require the same levels of insurance under our lease, management and other agreements, that such insurance will be available at a reasonable cost in the future or that the policies maintained will fully cover all losses on our properties upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, nor can we make any guaranty as to the future financial viability of the insurers that underwrite our policies and the policies maintained by our tenants, operators and managers.

For various reasons, including to reduce and manage costs, many healthcare companies utilize different organizational and corporate structures coupled with self-insurance trusts or captive programs that may provide less insurance coverage than a traditional insurance policy. Companies that insure any part of their general and professional liability risks through their own captive limited purpose entities generally estimate the future cost of general and professional liability through actuarial studies that rely primarily on historical data. However, due to the rise in the number and severity of professional claims against healthcare providers, these actuarial studies may underestimate the future cost of claims, and reserves for future claims may not be adequate to cover the actual cost of those claims. As a result, the tenants and operators of our properties who self-insure could incur large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses, which could materially adversely affect their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their obligations to us. If we or the managers of our senior living operations decide to implement a captive or self-insurance program, any large funded and unfunded general and professional liability expenses incurred could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur substantial liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. Following the occurrence of such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.

Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events and the physical effects of climate change could result in losses to the Company.

Certain of our properties are located in areas particularly susceptible to revenue loss, cost increase or damage caused by catastrophic weather and other natural events, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our or our tenants’, operators’ and managers’ property insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable.

To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue.

The decision of the United Kingdom to exit the European Union could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In 2019, we derived 1.3% of our NOI from the United Kingdom. The decision made in the British referendum of June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has led to volatility in the financial markets of the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”), and more broadly across Europe and may also lead to weakening in consumer, corporate and financial confidence in such markets. The U.K. government initiated the official EU withdrawal process on March 29, 2017, and the exit from the EU was expected to occur by the end of March 2019. However, the withdrawal was extended several times due to deadlock in negotiations. On January 29, 2020, the U.K. Parliament approved a withdrawal agreement submitted on January 22, 2020, and the U.K. officially withdrew from the EU on January 31, 2020. There is a transition period through December 2020, with an option to extend an additional one to two years, to allow for businesses and individuals to adjust to its

changes, during which all EU regulations will continue to apply to the U.K. Trade negotiations are expected to begin in early March 2020, but the nature of the economic relationship between the EU and U.K. remains uncertain, and there is no guarantee that both parties will be able to reach an agreement before the transition period expires. This Brexit decision has created political and economic uncertainty, particularly in the U.K. and the EU, and this uncertainty may last for years. Our business could be affected during this period of uncertainty, and perhaps longer, by the impact of the U.K. referendum. In addition, our business could be negatively affected by new trade agreements between the U.K. and other countries, including the U.S., and by the possible imposition of trade or other regulatory barriers in the U.K. These possible negative impacts, and others resulting from the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU, could adversely affect our and our tenants’ businesses, financial conditions and results of operations.

Significant legal actions or regulatory proceedings could subject us or our tenants, operators and managers to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we may be subject to claims brought against us in lawsuits and other legal or regulatory proceedings arising out of our alleged actions or the alleged actions of our tenants, operators and managers for which such tenants, operators and managers may have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. An unfavorable resolution of any such litigation or proceeding could materially adversely affect our or their liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

In certain cases, we and our tenants, operators and managers may be subject to professional liability claims brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys seeking significant punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Due to the historically high frequency and severity of professional liability claims against seniors housing and healthcare providers, the availability of professional liability insurance has decreased and the premiums on such insurance coverage remain costly. As a result, insurance protection against such claims may not be sufficient to cover all claims against us or our tenants, operators or managers, and may not be available at a reasonable cost. If we or our tenants, operators and managers are unable to maintain adequate insurance coverage or are required to pay punitive damages, we or they may be exposed to substantial liabilities.

The occurrence of cyber incidents could disrupt our operations, result in the loss of confidential information and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.

As our reliance on technology has increased, our business is subject to greater risk from cyber incidents, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our or our managers’ systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information, and other electronic security breaches.  While we and our managers have implemented measures to help mitigate these threats, such measures cannot guarantee that we will be successful in preventing a cyber incident.  The occurrence of a cyber incident could disrupt our operations, or the operations of our managers, compromise the confidential information of our employees or the residents in our seniors housing communities, and/or damage our business relationships and reputation.

Our operators may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute.

Our operators who engage in business with the federal government may be sued under a federal whistleblower statute designed to combat fraud and abuse in the healthcare industry. See “Governmental Regulation—Healthcare Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These lawsuits can involve significant monetary damages and award bounties to private plaintiffs who successfully bring these suits. If any of these lawsuits were brought against our operators, such suits combined with increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our operators’ liquidity, financial condition and results of operations and on their ability to satisfy their obligations under our leases, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

We could incur substantial liabilities and costs if any of our properties are found to be contaminated with hazardous substances or we become involved in any environmental disputes.

Under federal and state environmental laws and regulations, a current or former owner of real property may be liable for costs related to the investigation, removal and remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum that are released from or are present at or under, or that are disposed of in connection with such property. Owners of real property may also face other environmental liabilities, including government fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities and damages for injuries to persons, property or natural resources. Environmental laws and regulations often impose liability without regard to whether the owner was aware of, or was responsible for, the presence, release or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum. In certain circumstances, environmental liability may result from the activities of a current or former operator of the property. Although we generally have indemnification rights against the current operators of our properties for contamination

caused by them, such indemnification may not adequately cover all environmental costs. See “Governmental Regulation—Environmental Regulation” included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain talented employees, and the loss of any one of our key personnel could adversely impact our business.

The success of our business depends, in part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and key employees, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees could significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our key officers and employees or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals in the future. Losing any one or more of these persons could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to provide a report by management on internal control over financial reporting, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such control. Because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud, effective internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatement and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting and our operating internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls as a result of changes to our business or otherwise, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely harmed and we could fail to meet our reporting obligations.

Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic locations to which a greater percentage of our NOI is attributed could adversely affect our financial results.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, approximately 34.8% of our total NOI was derived from properties located in California (13.8%), New York (6.4%), Texas (5.9%), Illinois (4.6%) and Pennsylvania (4.1%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased construction and competition or decreased demand for our properties, regional climate events and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

Our ownership of properties in Canada and the United Kingdom currently subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars or the British pound, which may, from time to time, impact our financial condition and results of operations. If we continue to expand our international presence through investments in, or acquisitions or development of, seniors housing or healthcare assets outside the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom, we may transact business in other foreign currencies. Although we may pursue hedging alternatives, including borrowing in local currencies, to protect against foreign currency fluctuations, we cannot assure you that such fluctuations will not have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure

We may become more leveraged.

As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $12.2 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The instruments governing our existing indebtedness permit us to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, and we may satisfy our capital and liquidity needs through additional borrowings. A high level of indebtedness would require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service, thereby reducing the funds available to implement our business strategy and make distributions to stockholders. A high level of indebtedness could also have the following consequences:

Potential limits on our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions and vulnerability in the event of a downturn in general economic conditions or in the real estate or healthcare industries;

Potential impairment of our ability to obtain additional financing to execute on our business strategy; and


Potential downgrade in the rating of our debt securities by one or more rating agencies, which could have the effect of, among other things, limiting our access to capital and increasing our cost of borrowing.

In addition, from time to time, we mortgage certain of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness. If we are unable to meet our mortgage payments, then the encumbered properties could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a resulting loss of income and asset value.

We are exposed to increases in interest rates, which could reduce our profitability and adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sell assets or engage in acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity, and our decision to hedge against interest rate risk might not be effective.

We receive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases that generally provide for fixed rental rates subject to annual escalations, while certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR, Bankers’ Acceptance or other indexes. The generally fixed rate nature of a significant portion of our revenues and the variable rate nature of certain of our debt obligations create interest rate risk. Although our operating assets provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, the costs of our existing floating rate debt and any new debt that we incur would increase. These increased costs could reduce our profitability, impair our ability to meet our debt obligations, or increase the cost of financing our acquisition, investment, development and redevelopment activity. An increase in interest rates also could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing, as well as decrease the amount that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to promptly reposition our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

We may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility with hedging arrangements that involve additional risks, including the risks that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes, that the amount of income we earn from hedging transactions may be limited by federal tax provisions governing REITs, and that these arrangements may cause us to pay higher interest rates on our debt obligations than otherwise would be the case. Moreover, no amount of hedging activity can fully insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate risk, if we choose to engage in such activities, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined and potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may affect our financial results.

LIBOR and certain other interest “benchmarks” may be subject to regulatory guidance and/or reform that could cause interest rates under our current or future debt agreements to perform differently than in the past or cause other unanticipated consequences. The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it intends to stop encouraging or requiring banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR rates after 2021, and it is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will evolve. While there is no consensus on what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of U.S. financial market participants, selected the Secured Overnight Finance Rate (“SOFR”) as an alternative to LIBOR. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash in the overnight U.S. treasury repo market, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York started to publish the SOFR in May 2018. At this time, it is impossible to predict whether the SOFR or another reference rate will become an accepted alternative to LIBOR. The discontinuation, reform or replacement of LIBOR or any other benchmark rates may have an unpredictable impact on contractual mechanics in the credit markets or cause disruption to the broader financial markets, and could have an adverse effect on LIBOR-based interest rates on our current or future debt obligations.

Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to raise the capital necessary to meet our debt service obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy, if our cash flow from operations is insufficient to satisfy these needs, and the failure to do so could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Although we believe that we have sufficient access to capital and other sources of funding to meet our expected liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that conditions in the capital markets will not deteriorate or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings and our results of operation and financial condition. If we cannot access capital at an acceptable cost or at all, we

may be required to liquidate one or more investments in properties at times that may not permit us to maximize the return on those investments or that could result in adverse tax consequences to us.

As a public company, our access to debt and equity capital depends, in part, on the trading prices of our senior notes and common stock, which, in turn, depend upon market conditions that change from time to time, such as the market’s perception of our financial condition, our growth potential and our current and expected future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions or a significant downgrade in the ratings assigned to our long-term debt could impact our ability to access capital or increase our borrowing costs. We also rely on the financial institutions that are parties to our revolving credit facilities. If these institutions become capital constrained, tighten their lending standards or become insolvent or if they experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from other borrowers within a short period of time, they may be unable or unwilling to honor their funding commitments to us, which would adversely affect our ability to draw on our revolving credit facilities and, over time, could negatively impact our ability to consummate acquisitions, repay indebtedness as it matures, fund capital expenditures or make distributions to our stockholders.

Covenants in the instruments governing our and our subsidiaries’ existing indebtedness limit our operational flexibility, and a covenant breach could materially adversely affect our operations.

The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness require us to comply with certain customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios and minimum net worth requirements. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to our compliance with these covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the applicable debt instruments and could trigger defaults under any of our other indebtedness that is cross-defaulted against such instruments, even if we satisfy our payment obligations. In addition, covenants contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness may restrict our ability to obtain cash distributions from such subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from our breach of any of these covenants, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Risks Arising from Our Status as a REIT

Loss of our status as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences for us and the value of our common stock.

If we lose our status as a REIT (currently or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to satisfy our obligations, to implement our business strategy and to make distributions to our stockholders for each of the years involved because:

We would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to regular U.S. federal corporate income tax;

We could be subject to increased state and local taxes; and

Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we could not elect to be subject to tax as a REIT for four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified.

In addition, in such event we would no longer be required to pay dividends to maintain REIT status, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control, as well as new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, may adversely affect our investors or our ability to remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements, generally including requirements regarding the ownership of our stock, requirements regarding the composition of our assets, a requirement that at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must make distributions to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains. Although we believe that we currently qualify as a REIT, we cannot assure you that we will continue to qualify for all future periods.


The 90% distribution requirement will decrease our liquidity and may limit our ability to engage in otherwise beneficial transactions.

To comply with the 90% distribution requirement applicable to REITs and to avoid the nondeductible excise tax, we must make distributions to our stockholders. Such distributions reduce the funds we have available to finance our investment, acquisition, development and redevelopment activity and may limit our ability to engage in transactions that are otherwise in the best interests of our stockholders.

Although we do not anticipate any inability to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to do so. For example, timing differences between the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, on the one hand, and the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses in arriving at our taxable income, on the other hand, or non-deductible expenses such as principal amortization or repayments or capital expenditures in excess of non-cash deductions may prevent us from having sufficient cash or liquid assets to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement.

In the event that timing differences occur or we decide to retain cash or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, we may seek to borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements. Any of these actions may require us to raise additional capital to meet our obligations; however, see “Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy.” The terms of the instruments governing our existing indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain of these transactions.

To preserve our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation contains ownership limits with respect to our capital stock that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company.

To assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT, our certificate of incorporation provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9.0% of our outstanding common stock or more than 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are beneficially owned in excess of the applicable limit are considered “excess shares” and are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the excess shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the excess shares. In addition, we have the right to purchase the excess shares for a price equal to the lesser of (i) the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or (ii) the market price on the day we purchase the shares, but if we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the shares at the direction of our Board of Directors. These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our use of TRSs is limited under the Code.

Under the Code, no more than 20% of the value of the gross assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. This limitation may affect our ability to increase the size of our TRSs’ operations and assets, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable limitation, or that such compliance will not adversely affect our business. Also, our TRSs may not, among other things, operate or manage certain health care facilities, which may cause us to forgo investments we might otherwise make. Finally, we may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the income derived from certain transactions with our TRSs that are not on an arm's-length basis. We believe our arrangements with our TRSs are on arm's-length terms and intend to continue to operate in a manner that allows us to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid application of that tax.

The tax imposed on REITs engaging in “prohibited transactions” may limit our ability to engage in transactions which would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.

A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Although we do not intend to hold any properties that would be characterized as held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business, unless a sale or disposition qualifies under certain statutory safe harbors, such characterization is a factual determination and no guarantee can be given that the IRS would agree with our characterization of our properties or that we will always be able to make use of the available safe harbors.


Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on our stockholders or us.

The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could adversely affect our investors or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our investors or us. New legislation, U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, or the federal income tax consequences of an investment in us. Also, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, could change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. Changes made by the 2017 Tax Act that could affect us and our stockholders include:

temporarily reducing individual U.S. federal income tax rates on ordinary income; the highest individual U.S. federal income tax rate has been reduced from 39.6% to 37% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;

permanently eliminating the progressive corporate tax rate structure, which previously imposed a maximum corporate tax rate of 35%, and replacing it with a flat corporate tax rate of 21%;

permitting a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including dividends received by our stockholders from us that are not designated by us as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income, which will allow individuals, trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026;

reducing the highest rate of withholding with respect to our distributions to non-U.S. stockholders that are treated as attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%;

limiting our deduction for net operating losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 to 80% of REIT taxable income (prior to the application of the dividends paid deduction);

generally limiting the deduction for net business interest expense in excess of 30% of a business’s “adjusted taxable income,” except for taxpayers (including most equity REITs) that engage in certain real estate businesses and elect out of this rule (provided that such electing taxpayers must use an alternative depreciation system with longer depreciation periods); and

eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax.

Many of these changes were effective immediately, without any transition periods or grandfathering for existing transactions. The 2017 Tax Act is unclear in many respects and could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementing regulations by the U.S. Treasury Department and IRS, any of which could lessen or increase the impact of the 2017 Tax Act. In addition, it is unclear how these U.S. federal income tax changes will affect state and local taxation, which often uses federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities. While some of the changes made by the 2017 Tax Act may adversely affect us in one or more reporting periods and prospectively, other changes may be beneficial on a going forward basis. We continue to work with our tax advisors and auditors to determine the full impact that the 2017 Tax Act as a whole will have on us.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


ITEM 2.    Properties

Seniors Housing and Healthcare Properties

As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life scienceresearch and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and wesystems. We had 1422 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We believe that maintaining a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets diversified by investment type, geographic location, asset type, tenant/operator, revenue source and operating model makes us less susceptible to single-state regulatory or reimbursement changes, regional climate events and local economic downturns and diminishes the risk that any single factor or event could materially harm our business.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $1.3$2.0 billion aggregate principal amount of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding, secured by 8884 of our properties. Excluding those portions attributed to our joint venture partners, our share of mortgage loan indebtedness outstanding was $1.2$1.8 billion.

The following table provides additional information regarding the geographic diversification of our portfolio of properties as of December 31, 2017 (including2019 (excluding properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities but excludingand properties classified as held for sale):.


Seniors Housing
Communities
 SNFs MOBs Life Science and Innovation Centers IRFs and LTACs Health Systems
Seniors Housing
Communities
 SNFs MOBs Research and Innovation Centers IRFs and LTACs Health Systems
Geographic Location
# of
Properties
 Units # of Properties 
Licensed
Beds
 # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties Licensed Beds # of Properties Licensed Beds
# of
Properties
 Units # of Properties Licensed Beds # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties 
Square Feet(1)
 # of Properties Licensed Beds # of Properties Licensed Beds
Alabama6
 122
 
 
 4
 469
 
 
 
 
 
 
5
 324
 
 
 4
 469
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arizona28
 2,394
 
 
 13
 830
 
 
 1
 60
 
 
27
 2,316
 
 
 15
 962
 
 
 1
 60
 
 
Arkansas4
 287
 
 
 1
 5
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
 302
 
 
 1
 5
 
 
 
 
 
 
California92
 9,633
 
 
 26
 2,058
 
 
 6
 503
 
 
81
 9,048
 
 
 29
 2,371
 
 
 6
 503
 
 
Colorado19
 1,689
 1
 82
 13
 769
 
 
 1
 68
 
 
15
 1,257
 1
 82
 13
 896
 
 
 1
 68
 
 
Connecticut14
 1,631
 
 
 
 
 2
 1,032
 
 
 
 
13
 1,587
 
 
 
 
 2
 1,033
 
 
 
 
District of Columbia
 
 
 
 2
 102
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 2
 102
 
 
 
 
 
 
Florida50
 4,582
 
 
 19
 404
 1
 259
 6
 511
 
 
44
 4,181
 
 
 11
 223
 1
 252
 6
 508
 
 
Georgia20
 1,751
 
 
 14
 1,201
 
 
 
 
 
 
18
 1,635
 
 
 14
 1,201
 
 
 
 
 
 
Idaho1
 70
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 70
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Illinois25
 2,953
 1
 82
 36
 1,448
 1
 129
 4
 430
 
 
25
 2,955
 1
 82
 36
 1,447
 1
 129
 4
 430
 
 
Indiana9
 680
 
 
 23
 1,603
 
 
 1
 59
 
 
5
 402
 
 
 23
 1,602
 
 
 1
 59
 
 
Kansas9
 541
 
 
 1
 33
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 515
 
 
 1
 33
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kentucky10
 911
 2
 280
 4
 173
 
 
 1
 384
 
 
9
 805
 
 
 4
 173
 
 
 1
 384
 
 
Louisiana1
 58
 
 
 5
 361
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 58
 
 
 5
 362
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maine6
 445
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
 452
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maryland5
 360
 
 
 2
 83
 5
 489
 
 
 
 
5
 352
 
 
 2
 83
 5
 467
 
 
 
 
Massachusetts19
 2,100
 6
 745
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15
 1,789
 
 
 
 
 1
 78
 
 
 
 
Michigan23
 1,457
 
 
 14
 599
 
 
 
 
 
 
21
 1,345
 
 
 13
 589
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minnesota14
 855
 
 
 4
 241
 
 
 
 
 
 
14
 856
 
 
 4
 241
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mississippi
 
 
 
 1
 51
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 1
 51
 
 
 
 
 
 
Missouri2
 153
 
 
 20
 1,096
 4
 636
 1
 60
 
 
2
 154
 
 
 21
 1,167
 5
 818
 1
 60
 
 
Montana3
 182
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
 222
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nebraska1
 134
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 133
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nevada5
 589
 
 
 5
 416
 
 
 1
 52
 
 
3
 326
 
 
 5
 416
 
 
 1
 52
 
 
New Hampshire1
 125
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
 126
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Jersey12
 1,136
 1
 153
 3
 37
 
 
 
 
 
 
12
 1,137
 1
 153
 3
 37
 
 
 
 
 
 
New Mexico4
 450
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2
 123
 4
 544
4
 451
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2
 123
 4
 544
New York41
 4,538
 
 
 4
 244
 
 
 
 
 
 
40
 4,639
 
 
 4
 244
 
 
 
 
 
 
North Carolina23
 1,894
 
 
 18
 759
 8
 1,371
 1
 124
 
 
22
 1,314
 
 
 17
 831
 8
 1,538
 1
 124
 
 
North Dakota2
 115
 
 
 1
 114
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
 115
 
 
 1
 114
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohio20
 1,225
 6
 907
 28
 1,225
 
 
 1
 50
 
 
19
 1,194
 
 
 28
 1,225
 
 
 1
 50
 
 
Oklahoma8
 463
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4
 954
7
 439
 
 
 1
 80
 
 
 
 
 4
 954
Oregon29
 2,584
 
 
 1
 105
 
 
 
 
 
 
29
 2,583
 
 
 1
 105
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pennsylvania32
 2,362
 4
 620
 9
 713
 3
 566
 1
 52
 
 
30
 2,201
 4
 620
 9
 713
 5
 953
 1
 52
 
 
Rhode Island6
 596
 
 
 
 
 2
 250
 
 
 
 
4
 399
 
 
 
 
 3
 580
 
 
 
 
South Carolina5
 402
 
 
 20
 1,104
 
 
 
 
 
 
6
 433
 
 
 20
 1,092
 
 
 
 
 
 
South Dakota4
 182
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
 182
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tennessee18
 1,420
 
 
 10
 395
 
 
 1
 49
 
 
18
 1,400
 
 
 7
 278
 
 
 1
 49
 
 
Texas49
 3,786
 
 
 18
 814
 
 
 9
 590
 1
 445
45
 3,578
 
 
 16
 837
 
 
 9
 584
 1
 445
Utah3
 321
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
 321
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Virginia8
 655
 
 
 5
 231
 3
 425
 
 
 
 
8
 655
 
 
 5
 231
 3
 453
 
 
 
 
Washington28
 2,357
 5
 469
 10
 579
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
 2,230
 5
 469
 10
 579
 
 
 
 
 
 
West Virginia2
 124
 4
 326
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
 124
 4
 326
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wisconsin48
 2,219
 
 
 21
 1,105
 ��
 
 
 
 
 
45
 2,218
 
 
 21
 1,105
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wyoming2
 168
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2
 169
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total U.S.711
 60,699
 30
 3,664
 355
 19,367
 29
 5,157
 37
 3,115

9

1,943
652
 56,992
 16
 1,732
 347
 19,864
 34
 6,301
 37
 3,106

9

1,943
Canada41
 4,499
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
70
 12,865
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United Kingdom12
 779
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3
 121
12
 776
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3
 121
Total764
 65,977
 30
 3,664
 355
 19,367
 29
 5,157
 37
 3,115

12

2,064
734
 70,633
 16
 1,732
 347
 19,864
 34
 6,301
 37
 3,106

12

2,064

(1) 
Square Feet are in thousands 

Corporate Offices

Our headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and we have an additional corporate office in Louisville, Kentucky. We lease all of our corporate offices.



ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings


The information contained in “NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 3. Except as set forth therein, we are not a party to, nor is any of our property the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings.


ITEM 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information


Our common stock, par value $0.25 per share, is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VTR.”     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the dividends declared per share.
 
Sales Price of
Common Stock
 
Cash Dividends
Declared
 High Low 
2016     
First Quarter$63.22
 $48.43
 $0.73
Second Quarter72.82
 59.69
 0.73
Third Quarter76.56
 67.33
 0.73
Fourth Quarter69.19
 57.86
 0.775
2017     
First Quarter$65.41
 $59.36
 $0.775
Second Quarter71.93
 62.63
 0.775
Third Quarter69.98
 64.80
 0.775
Fourth Quarter65.39
 59.84
 0.79

As of January 31, 2018,February 17, 2020, we had 356.2372.9 million shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 4,5203,926 stockholders of record.


Dividends and Distributions


We pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) governing REITs. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code, among other things, to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018.

On February 9, 2018, our Board of Directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2018 dividend on our common stock in the amount of $0.79 per share, payable in cash on April 12, 2018 to stockholders of record on April 2, 2018. We expect to distribute at least 100% of our taxable net income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, to our stockholders for 2018.2020.


In general, our Board of Directors makes decisions regarding the nature, frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis. Because the Board considers many factors when making these decisions, including our present and future liquidity needs, our current and projected financial condition and results of operations and the performance and credit quality of our tenants, operators, borrowers and managers, we cannot assure you that we will maintain the practice of paying regular quarterly dividends to continue to qualify as a REIT. Please see “Cautionary Statements” and the risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy.


Director and Employee Stock Sales


Certain of our directors, executive officers and other employees have adopted and, from time to time in the future, may adopt non-discretionary, written trading plans that comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, or otherwise monetize, gift or transfer their equity-based compensation. These transactions typically are conducted for estate, tax and financial planning purposes and are subject to compliance with our Amended and Restated Securities Trading Policy and Procedures (“Securities Trading Policy”), the minimum stock ownership requirements contained in our Guidelines on Governance and all applicable laws and regulations.



Our Securities Trading Policy expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from buying or selling derivatives with respect to our securities or other financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of our securities and from engaging in short sales with respect to our securities. In addition, our Securities Trading Policy prohibits our directors and executive officers from holding our securities in margin accounts or pledging our securities to secure loans without the prior approval of our Audit and Compliance Committee. Each of our executive officers has advised us that he or she is in compliance with the Securities Trading Policy and has not pledged any of our equity securities to secure margin or other loans.


Stock Repurchases


The table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 2017:2019:
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
 
Average Price
Per Share
Number of Shares
Repurchased (1)
 
Average Price
Per Share
October 1 through October 318,378
 $62.51
13,085
 $71.14
November 1 through November 30
 $
181
 $59.20
December 1 through December 31
 $
21,091
 $57.08


(1)Repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees under our 2006 Incentive Plan or 2012 Incentive Plan or restricted stock units granted to employees under the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) 2005 Performance Incentive Plan and assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of NHP. The value of the shares withheld is the closing price of our common stock on the date the vesting or exercise occurred (or, if not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day) or the fair market value of our common stock at the time of the exercise, as the case may be.

Stock Performance Graph


The following performance graph compares the cumulative total return (including dividends) to the holders of our common stock from December 31, 20122014 through December 31, 2017,2019, with the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index, the FTSE NAREITNareit Composite REIT Index (the “Composite REIT Index”) and the S&P 500 Index over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 20122014 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indexes and assumes reinvestment of dividends, as applicable. We have included the NYSE Composite Index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the NYSE, and we have included the S&P 500 Index because we are a member of the S&P 500. We have included the Composite REIT Index because we believe that it is most representative of the industries in which we compete, or otherwise provides a fair basis for comparison with us, and is therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance. The figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar.
12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/201712/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2019
Ventas$100 $92.36 $120.92 $114.20 $132.64 $133.54$100 $94 $110 $110 $114 $118
NYSE Composite Index$100 $126.40 $135.09 $129.72 $145.38 $172.83$100 $96 $108 $128 $117 $147
Composite REIT Index$100 $102.34 $130.21 $132.88 $145.33 $158.84$100 $102 $112 $122 $117 $150
S&P 500 Index$100 $132.37 $150.48 $152.55 $170.78 $208.05$100 $101 $113 $138 $132 $174



chart-7546c48c7887535dbdb.jpg



ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data


The selected financial data has been derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and previous Annual Reports on Form 10- K. You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as acquisitions, dispositions, changes in accounting policies and other items may impact the comparability of the financial data.
As of and For the Years Ended December 31,As of and For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 2014 20132019 2018 2017 2016 2015
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data                  
Rental income$1,593,598
 $1,476,176
 $1,346,046
 $1,138,457
 $1,036,356
$1,609,876
 $1,513,807
 $1,593,598
 $1,476,176
 $1,346,046
Resident fees and services1,843,232
 1,847,306
 1,811,255
 1,552,951
 1,406,005
2,151,533
 2,069,477
 1,843,232
 1,847,306
 1,811,255
Interest expense448,196
 419,740
 367,114
 292,065
 249,009
451,662
 442,497
 448,196
 419,740
 367,114
Property-level operating expenses1,483,072
 1,434,762
 1,383,640
 1,195,388
 1,109,925
1,808,208
 1,689,880
 1,483,072
 1,434,762
 1,383,640
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,035
 121,738
 115,083
165,996
 151,982
 135,490
 126,875
 128,035
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 389,539
 359,296
 375,498
439,297
 415,991
 1,361,222
 652,412
 408,119
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
 475,767
 453,509
433,016
 409,467
 1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
Per Share Data                  
Income from continuing operations:                  
Basic$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
 $1.22
 $1.28
$1.20
 $1.17
 $3.83
 $1.89
 $1.24
Diluted$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
 $1.21
 $1.27
$1.19
 $1.16
 $3.80
 $1.87
 $1.22
Net income attributable to common stockholders:                  
Basic$3.82
 $1.88
 $1.26
 $1.62
 $1.55
$1.18
 $1.15
 $3.82
 $1.88
 $1.26
Diluted$3.78
 $1.86
 $1.25
 $1.60
 $1.54
$1.17
 $1.14
 $3.78
 $1.86
 $1.25
Dividends declared per common share$3.115
 $2.965
 $3.04
 $2.965
 $2.735
Other Data                  
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,442,180
 $1,372,341
 $1,398,831
 $1,261,281
 $1,201,706
$1,437,783
 $1,381,467
 $1,428,752
 $1,354,702
 $1,402,003
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) (2,423,692) (2,055,040) (1,282,760)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 1,023,058
 751,621
 108,045
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (937,107) (1,214,280) (2,420,740)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) (671,327) 96,838
 1,023,058
FFO (1)
1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
 1,273,680
 1,208,458
1,436,049
 1,308,149
 1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
Normalized FFO (1)
1,491,241
 1,438,643
 1,493,683
 1,330,018
 1,220,709
1,423,047
 1,462,055
 1,491,241
 1,438,643
 1,493,683
Balance Sheet Data                  
Real estate investments, at cost$26,205,833
 $25,327,215
 $23,802,454
 $20,196,770
 $21,403,592
Real estate property, gross$28,817,100
 $26,476,938
 $26,260,553
 $25,380,524
 $23,855,137
Cash and cash equivalents81,355
 286,707
 53,023
 55,348
 94,816
106,363
 72,277
 81,355
 286,707
 53,023
Total assets23,954,541
 23,166,600
 22,261,918
 21,165,913
 19,731,494
24,692,208
 22,584,555
 23,954,541
 23,166,600
 22,261,918
Senior notes payable and other debt11,276,062
 11,127,326
 11,206,996
 10,844,351
 9,364,992
12,158,773
 10,733,699
 11,276,062
 11,127,326
 11,206,996


(1) 
We consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be usefulappropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.


FFO and normalized FFO presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or otherwise disclosed by us, may not be comparable to FFO and normalized FFO presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. FFO and normalized FFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determined

attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

(“GAAP”)) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO and normalized FFO necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs.


We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”Nareit”) definition of FFO. NAREITNareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income;Income and non-cash charges related to lease terminations; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters.


See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds from Operations” included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of FFO and normalized FFO to our GAAP earnings.


ITEM 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an understanding and assessment of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Ventas, Inc. You should read this discussion in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as it will help you understand:


Our company and the environment in which we operate;


Our 2017 highlights and other recent developments;2019 highlights;


Our critical accounting policies and estimates;


Our results of operations for the last three years;


Our non-GAAP financial measures:

How we manage our assets and liabilities;


Our liquidity and capital resources;


Our cash flows; and


Our future contractual obligations.


Corporate and Operating Environment


We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned more thanapproximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office

buildings (“MOBs”), life scienceresearch and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and wesystems. We had 1422 properties under development, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. We are an S&P 500 company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.


We primarily invest in seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased a total of 546412 properties (excluding MOBs)properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2017, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297 seniors housing communities for us.
Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together, together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135122 properties (excluding one propertytwo properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement)agreements), 1011 properties and 3132 properties, (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.2019


As of December 31, 2019, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) to manage 406 seniors housing communities for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Lillibridge”) subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC (“PMBRES”), we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.


We conduct our operations through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, our consolidated portfolio included 100% ownership interests in 1,1351,109 properties and controlling joint venture interests in 6986 properties, and we had non-controlling ownership interests in 31six properties through investments in unconsolidated entities. Through Lillibridge, and PMBRES, we provided management and leasing services to third parties with respect to 10574 MOBs as of December 31, 2017.2019.


We aim to enhance shareholder value by delivering consistent, superior total returns through a strategy of: (1) generating reliable and growing cash flows; (2) maintaining a balanced, diversified portfolio of high-quality assets; and (3) preserving our financial strength, flexibility and liquidity.


Our ability to access capital in a timely and cost-effective manner is critical to the success of our business strategy because it affects our ability to satisfy existing obligations, including the repayment of maturing indebtedness, and to make future investments. Factors such as general market conditions, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, expectations of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, and the trading price of our common stock that are beyond our control and fluctuate over time all impact our access to and cost of external capital. For that reason, we generally attempt to match the long-term duration of our investments in real property with long-term financing through the issuance of shares of our common stock or the incurrence of long-term fixed rate debt.


20172019 Highlights and Other Recent Developments


Investments and DispositionsFor information regarding our 2019 highlights, see “Business” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


In March 2017, we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiary of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (of which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science, research and medical assets and one medical office building) and three seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5 million for the full repayment of loans receivable, which resulted in total gains of $0.6 million.

Liquidity, Capital and Dividends

In March 2017, we issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we entered into an unsecured credit facility comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, we issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans.

In September 2017, we entered into a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility which matures in 2022 and will be primarily used to finance life science and innovation center and other construction projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which grew by 2% over third quarter 2017 and was paid in January 2018.

Portfolio

The sale of the triple-net leased properties above included 36 SNFs, owned by us and operated by Kindred. These assets were sold for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and we recognized a gain on the sale of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

Other Recent Developments

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), as published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base these estimates on our experience and assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or

other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. We periodically reevaluate our estimates and assumptions, and in the event they prove to be different from actual results, we make adjustments in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the critical accounting policies described below, among others, affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements. For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Principles of Consolidation


The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.


GAAP requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.


We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.


As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s). We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life science projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs and that we are the

primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions


On January 1, 2017,When we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the FASB’s definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for makingacquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether athe transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that whenOur real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.

assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.


We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the

acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.    

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. Where we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.    

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of real estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.     

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of investments in real estate are based upon discounted future cash flow projections, if necessary, or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize rental revenues under our leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability of substantially all rents is probable. We assess the probability of collecting substantially all rents under our leases based on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant, the type of property, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, expected future performance of the property and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is not probable that we will be able to collect substantially all rents, we recognize a charge to rental income. If we change our conclusions regarding the probability of collecting rent payments required by a lease, we may recognize adjustments to rental income in the period we make such change in our conclusions.
Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not

subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.

We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards

We adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) on January 1, 2019, which introduced a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification.

ASC 842 allows for several practical expedients which permit the following: no reassessment of lease classification or initial direct costs; use of the standard’s effective date as the date of initial application; and no separation of non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. We elected these practical expedients using the effective date as our date of initial application. Therefore, financial information and disclosures under ASC 842 are not provided for periods prior to January 1, 2019.

Upon adoption, we recognized both right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases in which we lease land, real property or other equipment. We now also report revenues and expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate taxes and insurance that are escrowed and obligations of the tenants in accordance with their respective leases with us. This reporting had no impact on our net income. Resident leases within our senior living operations reportable business segment and office leases also contain service elements. We elected the practical expedient to account for our resident and office leases as a single lease component. Also, we now expense certain leasing costs, other than leasing commissions, as they are incurred. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, GAAP provided for the deferral and amortization of such costs over the applicable lease term. We are continuing to amortize any unamortized deferred lease costs as of December 31, 2018 over their respective lease terms.

As of January 1, 2019 we recognized operating lease assets of $361.7 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets which includes the present value of minimum lease payments as well as certain existing above and/or below market lease intangible values associated with such leases. Also upon adoption, we recognized operating lease liabilities of $216.9 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The present value of minimum lease payments was calculated on each lease using a discount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate primarily adjusted for the length of the individual lease terms. As of the January 1, 2019 adoption date, we utilized discount rates ranging from 6.15% to 7.60% for our ground leases.
Upon adoption, we recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $0.6 million primarily relating to certain costs associated with unexecuted leases that were deferred as of December 31, 2018.


Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2019, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and research and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment net operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$754,337
 $740,318
 $14,019
 1.9 %
Senior living operations630,135
 623,276
 6,859
 1.1
Office operations574,157
 538,506
 35,651
 6.6
All other92,610
 127,520
 (34,910) (27.4)
Total segment NOI2,051,239
 2,029,620
 21,619
 1.1
Interest and other income10,984
 24,892
 (13,908) (55.9)
Interest expense(451,662) (442,497) (9,165) (2.1)
Depreciation and amortization(1,045,620) (919,639) (125,981) (13.7)
General, administrative and professional fees(165,996) (151,982) (14,014) (9.2)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(41,900) (58,254) 16,354
 28.1
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(15,235) (30,547) 15,312
 50.1
Other17,609
 (66,768) 84,377
 nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 (25,406) (6.6)
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) 52,580
 95.5
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 (20,225) (43.7)
Income tax benefit56,310
 39,953
 16,357
 40.9
Income from continuing operations439,297
 415,991
 23,306
 5.6
Discontinued operations
 (10) 10
 nm
Net income439,297
 415,981
 23,316
 5.6
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 233
 3.6
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 23,549
 5.8

nm—not meaningful

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$780,898
 $737,796
 $43,102
 5.8%
Other services revenue
 2,522
 (2,522) nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(26,561) 
 (26,561) nm
Segment NOI$754,337
 $740,318
 14,019
 1.9
nm—not meaningful

In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms.

Pursuant to our adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we now report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants. For further information regarding our adoption of ASC 842, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2019 over the prior year primarily due to the second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to the Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and net increases in rent, partially offset by fewer assets in the portfolio due to dispositions and operator transitions of seniors housing communities from triple-net leased properties to senior living operations.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2019 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2019 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2018 for the 12 months ended September 30, 2018. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.
 Number of Properties at December 31, 2019 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019  Number of Properties at December 31, 2018 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2018
Seniors housing communities326
 86.0%  361
 85.0%
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16
 87.3
  17
 85.2
IRFs and LTACs36
 53.6
  36
 56.5

The following table compares results of operations for our 393 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$749,561
 $688,914
 $60,647
 8.8%
Less: Property-level operating expenses(25,180) 
 (25,180) nm
Segment NOI$724,381
 $688,914
 35,467
 5.1

nm—not meaningful
The increase in our same-store triple-net leased properties rental income in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to the Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and net increases in rent.


Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$2,151,533
 $2,069,477
 $82,056
 4.0 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,521,398) (1,446,201) (75,197) (5.2)
Segment NOI$630,135
 $623,276
 6,859
 1.1
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total communities401
 355
 86.6% 87.0% $5,451
 $5,699
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our seniors housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary service income. Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties.

The increase in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the acquisition of an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”), partially offset by decreases in occupancy and increases in property-level operating expenses.

The following table compares results of operations for our 340 same-store senior living operating communities.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,990,057
 $1,989,104
 $953
 nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,401,208) (1,376,142) (25,066) (1.8)
Segment NOI$588,849
 $612,962
 (24,113) (3.9)

nm—not meaningful

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store communities340
 340
 86.5% 87.2% $5,787
 $5,733

The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment NOI was primarily attributable to increases in property-level operating expenses and decreases in occupancy.

Effective January 1, 2020, we amended the same-store definition for our senior living operations segment in order to better align with industry practice. Going forward, among other changes, redevelopments in our senior living operations

segment that are considered materially disruptive will be excluded from the same-store pool until they meet the definition for subsequent inclusion. If this policy had been in place for 2019, same-store senior living operations results would have been based on same-store communities of 334 while the year-over-year change in same-store segment NOI would have remained substantially unchanged at (3.9%).

Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$828,978
 $776,011
 $52,967
 6.8 %
Office building services revenue7,747
 7,592
 155
 2.0
Total revenues836,725
 783,603
 53,122
 6.8
Less:       
Property-level operating expenses(260,249) (243,679) (16,570) (6.8)
Office building services costs(2,319) (1,418) (901) (63.5)
Segment NOI$574,157
 $538,506
 35,651
 6.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total office buildings382
 387
 90.3% 90.1% $34
 $32
The increase in our office operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to 2019 increases in occupancy and 2018 and 2019 acquisitions and openings of new buildings, partially offset by dispositions.

The following table compares results of operations for our 353 same-store office buildings.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$723,229
 $709,714
 $13,515
 1.9 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(224,072) (218,272) (5,800) (2.7)
Segment NOI$499,157
 $491,442
 7,715
 1.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store office buildings353
 353
 92.1% 91.9% $33
 $32
The increase in our same-store office operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to increases in occupancy.



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. The $34.9 million decrease in all other segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is primarily due to reduced income related to the $700.0 million term loan that we made to Ardent in March 2017, which was fully repaid in June 2018, partially offset by increased 2019 investment activity. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest and other income

The $13.9 million decrease in interest and other income in 2019 over the prior year is primarily due to a $12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of 2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions. See “NOTE 3-CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest Expense

The $9.2 million increase in total interest expense in 2019 over the prior year is primarily attributable to an increase of $17.9 million due to higher debt balances and decreased capitalized interest, partially offset by a decrease of $10.7 million due to a lower effective interest rate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.8% for 2019, compared to 3.9% for 2018. Capitalized interest for 2019 and 2018 was $9.0 million and $10.9 million, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations increased during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to real estate impairments and asset acquisitions, net of dispositions.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2019 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $600.0 million aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2018 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $1.3 billion aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019 and our 4.75% senior notes due 2021.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $15.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2019 over the prior year was due primarily to costs associated with the 2018 transition of the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living.

Other

The $84.4 million change in other for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to 2019 property insurance recoveries related to natural disasters in addition to 2018 impairments and expenses related to natural disasters.

Loss from Unconsolidated Entities

The $52.6 million decrease in loss from unconsolidated entities for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to our share of improved financial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2019 and a $35.7 million impairment in 2018 relating to the carrying costs of one of our equity method investments consisting principally of SNFs.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $20.2 million decrease in gain on real estate dispositions for 2019 over 2018 is due primarily to higher disposition activity in 2018.

Income Tax Benefit

The $16.4 million increase in income tax benefit related to continuing operations for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to a $57.6 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by the reversal of a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards in the fourth quarter of 2018. The $23.3 million valuation allowance reversal recorded in 2018 was an adjustment to the provisional amount recorded in the prior year related to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and was made based upon additional guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service subsequent to enactment.
Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income attributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) definition of FFO. Nareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income and non-cash charges related to lease terminations; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-

related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters.    

The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2019 over the prior year is due primarily to the $12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of 2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions and 2018 loan repayments and fees.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Adjustments:         
Real estate depreciation and amortization1,039,550
 913,537
 881,088
 891,985
 887,126
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(9,762) (6,926) (7,565) (7,785) (7,906)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities187
 1,977
 4,231
 5,754
 7,353
(Gain) loss on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(1,263) (875) (1,057) (439) 19
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027) 
 176
Impairment on equity method investment
 35,708
 
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests343
 1,508
 18
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273) (98,203) (18,580)
Discontinued operations:         
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions
 
 
 1
 (231)
Depreciation on real estate assets
 
 
 
 79,608
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,436,049
 1,308,149
 1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
Adjustments:         
Change in fair value of financial instruments(78) (18) (41) 62
 460
Non-cash income tax benefit(58,918) (18,427) (22,387) (34,227) (42,384)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
 (24,618) (36,539) 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 63,073
 839
 2,779
 15,797
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(18) (2) (39) (557) 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs18,208
 38,145
 14,823
 28,290
 152,344
Amortization of other intangibles484
 759
 1,458
 1,752
 2,058
Other items related to unconsolidated entities3,291
 5,035
 3,188
 
 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan7,812
 4,830
 5,453
 
 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
 
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,683) 63,830
 11,601
 
 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,423,047
 $1,462,055
 $1,491,241
 $1,438,643
 $1,493,683


Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings, which includes amounts in discontinued operations, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to lease terminations, and including our share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:     
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(52,677) (37,230) (57,307)
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs15,246
 33,608
 12,653
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA(16,396) (10,420) (12,975)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities32,462
 86,278
 32,219
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(1,061) 138
 (612)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(104) (54) (61)
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,981) 54,684
 11,601
Adjusted EBITDA$1,931,588
 $1,961,876
 $1,985,129

NOI

We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition

of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:     
Interest and other income(10,984) (24,892) (6,034)
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
General, administrative and professional fees165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Discontinued operations
 10
 110
Other(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,454
 55,034
 561
Income tax benefit(56,310) (39,953) (59,799)
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
NOI$2,051,239
 $2,029,620
 $2,081,652

See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the full period in both comparison periods and are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance. Same-store excludes: (i) properties sold or classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) for properties included in our office operations reportable business segment, those properties for which management has an intention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; and (iii) for other assets, those properties (A) that have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period or (B) for which an operator or business model transition has been scheduled after the start of the prior comparison period.  Newly-developed properties in the office operations and triple-net leased properties reportable business segments will be included in same-store if in service for the full period in both periods presented. To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all same-store NOI measures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.

Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and available for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (Dollars in thousands)
Balance:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes$8,584,056
 $7,945,598
 $8,218,369
Unsecured term loans200,000
 400,000
 200,000
Secured revolving construction credit facility160,492
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
1,325,854
 698,136
 1,010,517
Variable rate:     
Senior notes231,018
 
 400,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility120,787
 765,919
 535,832
Unsecured term loans385,030
 500,000
 700,000
Commercial paper notes567,450
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 90,488
 2,868
Mortgage loans and other(1)
671,115
 429,561
 298,047
Total$12,245,802
 $10,829,702
 $11,365,633
Percent of total debt:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes70.1% 73.4% 72.3%
Unsecured term loans1.6
 3.7
 1.8
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
10.8
 6.4
 8.9
Variable rate:     
Senior notes1.9
 
 3.5
Unsecured revolving credit facility1.0
 7.1
 4.7
Unsecured term loans3.1
 4.6
 6.2
Commercial paper notes4.7
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 0.8
 0.0
Mortgage loans and other(1)
5.5
 4.0
 2.6
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes3.7% 3.8% 3.7%
Unsecured term loans2.0
 2.8
 2.1
Secured revolving construction credit facility4.5
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
3.7
 4.4
 5.2
Variable rate:     
Senior notes2.5
 
 2.3
Unsecured revolving credit facility2.4
 3.2
 2.3
Unsecured term loans2.9
 3.3
 2.3
Commercial paper notes2.0
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 4.1
 3.1
Mortgage loans and other(1)
3.4
 3.4
 2.9
Total3.5
 3.7
 3.6
(1)
Excludes mortgage debt of $57.4 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 which was included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $147.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2022 to May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $505.1 million and C$119.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from August 2020 to December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.     

The increase in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018 is primarily attributable to the assumption of mortgage debt related to the LGM Acquisition and our November 2019 issuance of floating rate senior notes.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2019, interest expense on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $19.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted common share.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $228.2 million and $100.9 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated entities, which was $60.6 million and $40.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally affect the fair value, but not our earnings or cash flows. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.

To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Gross book value10,270,402
 $9,043,734
Fair value10,784,441
 8,926,280
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:   
-100 basis points11,438,507
 9,574,799
+100 basis points10,196,943
 8,568,149

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 was due primarily to 2019 senior note issuances, net of repayments, and the assumption of mortgage debt related to the LGM Acquisition.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $710.5 million and $479.4 million, respectively. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” and “NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2019 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 would decrease or increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 0.1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.


Concentration and Credit Risk

We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 
As of
December 31,
 2019 2018
Investment mix by asset type(1):
   
Seniors housing communities62.2% 61.6%
MOBs19.3
 20.4
Research and innovation centers8.7
 8.1
Health systems5.1
 5.6
IRFs and LTACs1.6
 1.7
SNFs0.7
 0.8
Secured loans receivable and investments, net2.4
 1.8
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
   
Atria20.4% 22.1%
Sunrise10.3
 11.0
Brookdale Senior Living7.7
 8.4
Ardent4.7
 5.2
Kindred1.0
 1.1
All other55.9
 52.2

(1)
Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:     
Revenues(1):
     
Senior living operations55.8% 55.3% 51.6%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7
 4.3
 4.7
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 3.1
Kindred3.3
 3.5
 4.7
All others33.1
 33.8
 35.9
Adjusted EBITDA:     
Senior living operations32.5% 31.3% 28.7%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.1
 6.7
 7.6
Ardent5.4
 5.1
 5.1
Kindred5.8
 5.6
 7.7
All others48.2
 51.3
 50.9
NOI:     
Senior living operations31.1% 30.7% 28.5%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.7
 7.6
 8.0
Ardent5.8
 5.7
 5.3
Kindred6.3
 6.4
 8.1
All others48.1
 49.6
 50.1
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
     
California15.9% 15.7% 15.3%
New York8.8
 8.4
 8.6
Texas6.0
 6.2
 5.8
Pennsylvania4.7
 4.6
 4.2
Florida4.0
 4.4
 4.4
All others60.6
 60.7
 61.7

(1)
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2)
Results exclude two seniors housing communities in 2019 and 2018 and one seniors housing community in 2017 included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3)
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniors housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 60.3% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter term leases and changing economic or market conditions.


The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniors housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interests in Atria entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, including the right to appoint two of six members to the Atria Board of Directors.    

Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations

Any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


The following table summarizes our triple-net lease expirations currently scheduled to occur over the next 10 years (excluding leases related to assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019):
 
Number of
Properties
 2019 Annual Rental Income % of 2019 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
20201
 $4,425
 0.6%
20218
 6,543
 0.8
20229
 10,777
 1.4
20236
 30,506
 3.9
202429
 16,747
 2.1
2025180
 315,596
 40.4
202636
 56,515
 7.2
20273
 6,857
 0.9
202866
 114,344
 14.6
202921
 25,284
 3.2

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During 2019, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our commercial paper program, proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.

For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt; (iv) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments and any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our significant financing activities.

Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans

Our unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, as of December 31, 2019. The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

In January 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), established an unsecured commercial paper program. Under the terms of the program, we may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2019, $567.5 million was outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2019, $120.8 million was outstanding under the unsecured revolving credit facility with an additional $24.0 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured

revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity and to support our commercial paper program. Including these internal limits, we had $2.3 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a $200.0 million unsecured term loan priced at LIBOR plus 0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.        

As of December 31, 2019, we had a $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility with $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and is primarily used to finance the development of research and innovation centers and other construction projects.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.
Senior Notes

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding $7.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Ventas Realty ($500.0 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2019.

Mortgages

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $2.0 billion and $1.1 billion, of which our share was $1.8 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

Derivatives and Hedging

In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.

Dividends

In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2020.

We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or

distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.

Capital Expenditures

The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.

To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2019, we had 22 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Equity Offerings

From time to time, we may sell our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). In August 2018, we replaced our expired ATM program with an identical program, under which we may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $66.75 per share. As of December 31, 2019, $822.1 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM program.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold no shares of our common stock under our ATM program.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$131,464
 $188,253
 $(56,789) (30.2)%
Net cash provided by operating activities1,437,783
 1,381,467
 56,316
 4.1
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (1,909,795) nm
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) 1,922,611
 nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 2,295
 nm
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 14,638
 11.1

nm—not meaningful

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities increased $56.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 over the same period in 2018 due primarily to higher NOI in 2019 including the impact of property acquisitions and lease-up of new developments, partially offset by asset dispositions, and lower merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2019.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities decreased $1.9 billion during 2019 over 2018 primarily due to increased acquisition and investment activity together with decreased real estate dispositions.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities increased $1.9 billion during 2019 over 2018 primarily due to the 2019 issuance of common stock and increased net borrowings in 2019.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2019:
 Total 
Less than 1 year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$15,591,539
 $1,296,990
 $2,607,408
 $3,799,947
 $7,887,194
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations803,659
 28,826
 90,930
 38,902
 645,001
Total$16,395,198
 $1,325,816
 $2,698,338
 $3,838,849
 $8,532,195

(1)
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)
Interest on variable rate debt based on rates as of December 31, 2019.
(3)
Includes $567.5 million of borrowings outstanding on our commercial paper program.
(4)
Includes $120.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022, $231.0 million outstanding principal amount of our floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022.
(5)
Includes $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023, $211.8 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $400.0 million

outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $462.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024.
(6)
Includes $385.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025 and $5.4 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2025 and 2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2019, we had $12.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonable reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.

ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2019.
In September 2019, the Company acquired an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”). As permitted under Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines, the Company excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, internal control over financial reporting of the operations of these acquired assets. Total assets and total revenues related to these operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on an operator-by-operator basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company will be unable to collect substantially all triple-net rents, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. The assessment is subjective and required complex auditor judgment to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions, including the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the expected operating performance of the leased property.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the relevant data inputs and assumptions in the collectibility assessment. To assess the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant and property financial information, tenant guarantees, the existence of outstanding accounts receivable, and the remaining term of the lease in the triple net collectibility assessment. We assessed the Company’s ability to estimate probability of collections by testing the reliability of the Company’s historical determinations.

Evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles

As discussed in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired approximately $2 billion of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2019. The purchase price was allocated to the real estate assets acquired, primarily buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles on a relative fair value basis.

We identified the evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles as a critical audit matter. The recorded value of investment in real estate, specifically buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, was sensitive to changes to the inputs and assumptions in the purchase price allocation. This resulted in a higher degree of subjectivity and required complex auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s purchase price allocation over buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles. We evaluated the Company’s inputs and assumptions that were used to determine relative fair value by 1) identifying and considering the relevancy, reliability, and sufficiency of the sources of data used by the Company in developing the assumptions, 2) comparing to relevant industry market data, and 3) where relevant, performing a retrospective analysis of the assumptions used in prior acquisitions. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in performing an assessment of the purchase price allocation to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, including the comparison to relevant market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Chicago, Illinois
February 21, 2020



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company acquired an interest in certain real estate assets through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice during 2019, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, the internal control over financial reporting of the operations of the acquired assets (LGM Operations). Total assets and total revenues related to LGM Operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of LGM Operations.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois February 21, 2020












VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets   
Real estate investments:   
Land and improvements$2,283,929
 $2,114,406
Buildings and improvements24,380,440
 22,437,243
Construction in progress461,354
 422,334
Acquired lease intangibles1,306,152
 1,502,955
Operating lease assets385,225
 
 28,817,100
 26,476,938
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(7,088,013) (6,383,281)
Net real estate property21,729,087
 20,093,657
Secured loans receivable and investments, net704,612
 495,869
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities45,022
 48,378
Net real estate investments22,478,721
 20,637,904
Cash and cash equivalents106,363
 72,277
Escrow deposits and restricted cash39,739
 59,187
Goodwill1,051,161
 1,050,548
Assets held for sale91,433
 5,454
Deferred income tax assets, net47,495
 
Other assets877,296
 759,185
Total assets$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
Liabilities and equity   
Liabilities:   
Senior notes payable and other debt$12,158,773
 $10,733,699
Accrued interest111,115
 99,667
Operating lease liabilities251,196
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,145,700
 1,086,030
Liabilities related to assets held for sale5,463
 205
Deferred income tax liabilities200,831
 205,219
Total liabilities13,873,078
 12,124,820
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests273,678
 188,141
Commitments and contingencies

 

Equity:   
Ventas stockholders’ equity:   
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
 
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 372,811 and 356,572 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively93,185
 89,125
Capital in excess of par value14,056,453
 13,076,528
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(34,564) (19,582)
Retained earnings (deficit)(3,669,050) (2,930,214)
Treasury stock, 2 and 0 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively(132) 
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,445,892
 10,215,857
Noncontrolling interests99,560
 55,737
Total equity10,545,452
 10,271,594
Total liabilities and equity$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
  See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues     
Rental income:     
Triple-net leased$780,898
 $737,796
 $840,131
Office828,978
 776,011
 753,467
 1,609,876
 1,513,807
 1,593,598
Resident fees and services2,151,533
 2,069,477
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenue11,156
 13,416
 13,677
Income from loans and investments89,201
 124,218
 117,608
Interest and other income10,984
 24,892
 6,034
Total revenues3,872,750
 3,745,810
 3,574,149
Expenses     
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Property-level operating expenses:     
Senior living1,521,398
 1,446,201
 1,250,065
Office260,249
 243,679
 233,007
Triple-net leased26,561
 
 
 1,808,208
 1,689,880
 1,483,072
Office building services costs2,319
 1,418
 3,391
General, administrative and professional fees165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Other(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Total expenses3,513,331
 3,360,985
 2,989,438
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 584,711
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) (561)
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 717,273
Income tax benefit56,310
 39,953
 59,799
Income from continuing operations439,297
 415,991
 1,361,222
Discontinued operations
 (10) (110)
Net income439,297
 415,981
 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Earnings per common share     
Basic:     
Income from continuing operations$1.20
 $1.17
 $3.83
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.18
 1.15
 3.82
Diluted:     
Income from continuing operations$1.19
 $1.16
 $3.80
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.17
 1.14
 3.78
  See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Other comprehensive (loss) income:     
Foreign currency translation5,729
 (9,436) 20,612
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities11,634
 14,944
 (437)
Derivative instruments(30,814) 10,030
 2,239
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(13,451) 15,538
 22,414
Comprehensive income425,846
 431,519
 1,383,526
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests7,649

6,514

4,642
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$418,197
 $425,005
 $1,378,884
See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
 
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2017$88,514
 $12,917,002
 $(57,534) $(2,487,695) $(47) $10,460,240
 $68,513
 $10,528,753
Net income
 
 
 1,356,470
 
 1,356,470
 4,642
 1,361,112
Other comprehensive income
 
 22,414
 
 
 22,414
 
 22,414
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 107
 
 
 
 107
 
 107
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (1,427) 
 
 
 (1,427) (13,292) (14,719)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.115 per share
 
 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473)
Issuance of common stock276
 72,618
 
 
 553
 73,447
 
 73,447
Issuance of common stock for stock plans87
 21,723
 
 
 796
 22,606
 
 22,606
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (850) 
 
 
 (850) 6,096
 5,246
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 253
 
 
 
 253
 
 253
Redemption of OP and Class C Units84
 19,845
 
 
 3,207
 23,136
 
 23,136
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures68
 23,786
 
 
 (4,551) 19,303
 
 19,303
Balance at December 31, 201789,029
 13,053,057
 (35,120) (2,240,698) (42) 10,866,226
 65,959
 10,932,185
Net income
 
 
 409,467
 
 409,467
 6,514
 415,981
Other comprehensive income
 
 15,538
 
 
 15,538
 
 15,538
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (7,470) 
 
 
 (7,470) (16,736) (24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share
 
 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans and other49
 11,542
 
 
 1,318
 12,909
 
 12,909
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (3,323) 
 
 
 (3,323) 
 (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units3
 (383) 
 
 252
 (128) 
 (128)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures44
 23,105
 
 
 (1,528) 21,621
 
 21,621
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
 
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
Balance at December 31, 201889,125
 13,076,528
 (19,582) (2,930,214) 
 10,215,857
 55,737
 10,271,594
Net income
 
 
 433,016
 
 433,016
 6,281
 439,297
Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
 (14,819) 
 
 (14,819) 1,368
 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (12,332) 
 
 
 (12,332) 36,174
 23,842
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share
 
 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829
 938,509
 
 
 
 942,338
 
 942,338
Issuance of common stock for stock plans152

64,581





6,587
 71,320
 
 71,320
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (7,388) 
 
 
 (7,388) 
 (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units1
 (739) 
 
 
 (738) 
 (738)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures78
 (2,706) 
 
 (6,719) (9,347) 
 (9,347)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
 
 (163) 801
 
 638
 
 638
Balance at December 31, 2019$93,185
 $14,056,453
 $(34,564) $(3,669,050) $(132) $10,445,892
 $99,560
 $10,545,452
   See accompanying notes.
VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(7,967) (30,660) (20,537)
Other non-cash amortization22,985
 18,886
 16,058
Stock-based compensation33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Straight-lining of rental income(30,073) 13,396
 (23,134)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Gain on real estate loan investments
 (13,202) (124)
Income tax benefit(58,918) (43,026) (63,599)
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,464
 55,034
 3,588
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities1,600
 2,934
 4,676
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters
 52,510
 4,616
Other13,264
 3,720
 4,624
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Increase in other assets(76,693) (23,198) (29,282)
Increase in accrued interest9,737
 4,992
 11,068
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities26,666
 (37,509) (35,259)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,437,783
 1,381,467
 1,428,752
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Net investment in real estate property(958,125) (265,907) (664,684)
Investment in loans receivable(1,258,187) (229,534) (748,119)
Proceeds from real estate disposals147,855
 353,792
 859,874
Proceeds from loans receivable1,017,309
 911,540
 101,097
Development project expenditures(403,923) (330,876) (299,085)
Capital expenditures(156,724) (131,858) (132,558)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities172
 57,455
 6,169
Investment in unconsolidated entities(3,855) (47,007) (61,220)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims30,179
 6,891
 1,419
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (937,107)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities(569,891) 321,463
 384,783
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program565,524
 
 
Proceeds from debt3,013,191
 2,549,473
 1,111,649
Repayment of debt(2,623,916) (3,465,579) (1,369,084)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 (4,724) (15,809)
Payment of deferred financing costs(21,403) (20,612) (27,297)
Issuance of common stock, net942,085
 
 73,596
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,157,720) (1,127,143) (827,285)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(9,218) (7,459) (5,677)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(2,203) (1,370) 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests6,282
 1,883
 4,402
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(9,717) (11,574) (11,187)
Proceeds from stock option exercises36,179
 8,762
 16,287
Other(8,519) (5,057) (5,705)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) (671,327)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash13,158
 (55,974) (179,682)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 581
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year131,464
 188,253
 367,354
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 $188,253

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts$410,584
 $406,907
 $409,890
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:     
Real estate investments$1,057,138
 $94,280
 $425,906
Other assets11,140
 5,398
 (3,716)
Debt907,746
 30,508
 75,231
Other liabilities47,121
 18,086
 70,878
Deferred income tax liability95
 922
 (14,869)
Noncontrolling interests113,316
 2,591
 4,202
Equity issued
 30,487
 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127
 907
 24,002
See accompanying notes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems. We had 22 properties under development, including 4 properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

We primarily invest in seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased a total of 412 properties (excluding properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our 3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 122 properties (excluding 2 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 11 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) to manage 406 seniors housing communities for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding LP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in research and innovation projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Assets Total Liabilities
  (In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P. $666,404
 $244,934
 $673,467
 $238,147
Other identified VIEs 4,075,821
 1,459,830
 2,076,715
 405,350
Tax credit VIEs 845,229
 333,809
 797,077
 297,004


Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under the HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions we receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of NHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2019, third party investors owned 3.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.

Prior to January 2017, we owned a majority interest in Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”) and we consolidated this entity because our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and was the primary beneficiary of this VIE. In January 2017, third party investors redeemed the remaining limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) outstanding. After giving effect to such redemptions, Ventas Realty OP is our wholly owned subsidiary.

As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Units at the greater of cost or redemption value. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the redeemable OP Units was $171.2 million and $174.6 million, respectively. We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Units. Our diluted earnings per share includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.
Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. We include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our research and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”) and/or new markets tax credits (“NMTCs”). As of December 31, 2019, we owned 10 properties, including 1 property in development, that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a nominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the TCI’s investment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s investment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions

When we acquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether the transaction involves an asset or a business. Our real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.


We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.


We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the

acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangibleWhere we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and liabilities within acquiredoperating lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.


We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.


We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.


Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets


We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leasedreal estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.


If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.


We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.


We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.


Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results

and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.


Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, have been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in which a change in classification is determined) to reflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as net real estate investments.

We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

We regularly evaluate the collectability of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $20.2 million, $18.1 million and $18.9 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Available for Sale Securities

We classify available for sale securities as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on available for sale securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments

We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of the changes in fair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair ValuesResults of Financial InstrumentsOperations


Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement,As of December 31, 2019, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. In our triple-net leased properties segment, we determine fair value based oninvest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy)United States and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three ofUnited Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the hierarchy).

Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilitiestenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in active markets that we haveseniors housing communities throughout the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assetsUnited States and liabilities in active marketsCanada and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals,engage independent operators, such as interest rates, foreign exchange ratesAtria and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based onSunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volumedevelop, lease and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgmentmanage MOBs and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Revenue Recognition

Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations

Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life scienceresearch and innovation center (collectively, “office operations”) leases providecenters throughout the United States. Information provided for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.

Senior Living Operations

We recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.

Other

We recognize interest“all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including discountscash, restricted cash, loans receivable and premiums, usinginvestments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment net operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$754,337
 $740,318
 $14,019
 1.9 %
Senior living operations630,135
 623,276
 6,859
 1.1
Office operations574,157
 538,506
 35,651
 6.6
All other92,610
 127,520
 (34,910) (27.4)
Total segment NOI2,051,239
 2,029,620
 21,619
 1.1
Interest and other income10,984
 24,892
 (13,908) (55.9)
Interest expense(451,662) (442,497) (9,165) (2.1)
Depreciation and amortization(1,045,620) (919,639) (125,981) (13.7)
General, administrative and professional fees(165,996) (151,982) (14,014) (9.2)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(41,900) (58,254) 16,354
 28.1
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(15,235) (30,547) 15,312
 50.1
Other17,609
 (66,768) 84,377
 nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 (25,406) (6.6)
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) 52,580
 95.5
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 (20,225) (43.7)
Income tax benefit56,310
 39,953
 16,357
 40.9
Income from continuing operations439,297
 415,991
 23,306
 5.6
Discontinued operations
 (10) 10
 nm
Net income439,297
 415,981
 23,316
 5.6
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 233
 3.6
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 23,549
 5.8

nm—not meaningful

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$780,898
 $737,796
 $43,102
 5.8%
Other services revenue
 2,522
 (2,522) nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(26,561) 
 (26,561) nm
Segment NOI$754,337
 $740,318
 14,019
 1.9
nm—not meaningful

In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms.

Pursuant to our adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we now report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants. For further information regarding our adoption of ASC 842, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2019 over the prior year primarily due to the second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to the Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and net increases in rent, partially offset by fewer assets in the portfolio due to dispositions and operator transitions of seniors housing communities from triple-net leased properties to senior living operations.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2019 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2019 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 2018 for the 12 months ended September 30, 2018. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.
 Number of Properties at December 31, 2019 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019  Number of Properties at December 31, 2018 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2018
Seniors housing communities326
 86.0%  361
 85.0%
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16
 87.3
  17
 85.2
IRFs and LTACs36
 53.6
  36
 56.5

The following table compares results of operations for our 393 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$749,561
 $688,914
 $60,647
 8.8%
Less: Property-level operating expenses(25,180) 
 (25,180) nm
Segment NOI$724,381
 $688,914
 35,467
 5.1

nm—not meaningful
The increase in our same-store triple-net leased properties rental income in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to the Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and net increases in rent.


Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$2,151,533
 $2,069,477
 $82,056
 4.0 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,521,398) (1,446,201) (75,197) (5.2)
Segment NOI$630,135
 $623,276
 6,859
 1.1
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total communities401
 355
 86.6% 87.0% $5,451
 $5,699
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our seniors housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary service income. Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties.

The increase in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to the acquisition of an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”), partially offset by decreases in occupancy and increases in property-level operating expenses.

The following table compares results of operations for our 340 same-store senior living operating communities.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,990,057
 $1,989,104
 $953
 nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,401,208) (1,376,142) (25,066) (1.8)
Segment NOI$588,849
 $612,962
 (24,113) (3.9)

nm—not meaningful

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store communities340
 340
 86.5% 87.2% $5,787
 $5,733

The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment NOI was primarily attributable to increases in property-level operating expenses and decreases in occupancy.

Effective January 1, 2020, we amended the same-store definition for our senior living operations segment in order to better align with industry practice. Going forward, among other changes, redevelopments in our senior living operations

segment that are considered materially disruptive will be excluded from the same-store pool until they meet the definition for subsequent inclusion. If this policy had been in place for 2019, same-store senior living operations results would have been based on same-store communities of 334 while the year-over-year change in same-store segment NOI would have remained substantially unchanged at (3.9%).

Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$828,978
 $776,011
 $52,967
 6.8 %
Office building services revenue7,747
 7,592
 155
 2.0
Total revenues836,725
 783,603
 53,122
 6.8
Less:       
Property-level operating expenses(260,249) (243,679) (16,570) (6.8)
Office building services costs(2,319) (1,418) (901) (63.5)
Segment NOI$574,157
 $538,506
 35,651
 6.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total office buildings382
 387
 90.3% 90.1% $34
 $32
The increase in our office operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to 2019 increases in occupancy and 2018 and 2019 acquisitions and openings of new buildings, partially offset by dispositions.

The following table compares results of operations for our 353 same-store office buildings.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$723,229
 $709,714
 $13,515
 1.9 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(224,072) (218,272) (5,800) (2.7)
Segment NOI$499,157
 $491,442
 7,715
 1.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store office buildings353
 353
 92.1% 91.9% $33
 $32
The increase in our same-store office operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to increases in occupancy.



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. The $34.9 million decrease in all other segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is primarily due to reduced income related to the $700.0 million term loan that we made to Ardent in March 2017, which was fully repaid in June 2018, partially offset by increased 2019 investment activity. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest and other income

The $13.9 million decrease in interest and other income in 2019 over the prior year is primarily due to a $12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of 2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions. See “NOTE 3-CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest Expense

The $9.2 million increase in total interest expense in 2019 over the prior year is primarily attributable to an increase of $17.9 million due to higher debt balances and decreased capitalized interest, partially offset by a decrease of $10.7 million due to a lower effective interest method when collectibility is reasonably assured. We apply therate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.8% for 2019, compared to 3.9% for 2018. Capitalized interest for 2019 and 2018 was $9.0 million and $10.9 million, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations increased during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to real estate impairments and asset acquisitions, net of dispositions.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2019 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $600.0 million aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2018 was due primarily to the redemption and repayment of $1.3 billion aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019 and our 4.75% senior notes due 2021.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $15.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2019 over the prior year was due primarily to costs associated with the 2018 transition of the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living.

Other

The $84.4 million change in other for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to 2019 property insurance recoveries related to natural disasters in addition to 2018 impairments and expenses related to natural disasters.

Loss from Unconsolidated Entities

The $52.6 million decrease in loss from unconsolidated entities for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to our share of improved financial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2019 and a $35.7 million impairment in 2018 relating to the carrying costs of one of our equity method investments consisting principally of SNFs.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $20.2 million decrease in gain on real estate dispositions for 2019 over 2018 is due primarily to higher disposition activity in 2018.

Income Tax Benefit

The $16.4 million increase in income tax benefit related to continuing operations for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to a $57.6 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by the reversal of a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards in the fourth quarter of 2018. The $23.3 million valuation allowance reversal recorded in 2018 was an adjustment to the provisional amount recorded in the prior year related to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and was made based upon additional guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service subsequent to enactment.
Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income attributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a loan-by-loanconsistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and recognizeother non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.

We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“Nareit”) definition of FFO. Nareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income and premiums as yield adjustments overnon-cash charges related to lease terminations; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-

related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loancosts and charitable donations made to the extent our estimate ofVentas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the collateral is sufficientre-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to support the balancenatural disasters.    

The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2019 over the prior year is due primarily to the $12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of 2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions and 2018 loan other receivablesrepayments and allfees.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Adjustments:         
Real estate depreciation and amortization1,039,550
 913,537
 881,088
 891,985
 887,126
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(9,762) (6,926) (7,565) (7,785) (7,906)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities187
 1,977
 4,231
 5,754
 7,353
(Gain) loss on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(1,263) (875) (1,057) (439) 19
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027) 
 176
Impairment on equity method investment
 35,708
 
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests343
 1,508
 18
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273) (98,203) (18,580)
Discontinued operations:         
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions
 
 
 1
 (231)
Depreciation on real estate assets
 
 
 
 79,608
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,436,049
 1,308,149
 1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
Adjustments:         
Change in fair value of financial instruments(78) (18) (41) 62
 460
Non-cash income tax benefit(58,918) (18,427) (22,387) (34,227) (42,384)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
 (24,618) (36,539) 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 63,073
 839
 2,779
 15,797
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(18) (2) (39) (557) 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs18,208
 38,145
 14,823
 28,290
 152,344
Amortization of other intangibles484
 759
 1,458
 1,752
 2,058
Other items related to unconsolidated entities3,291
 5,035
 3,188
 
 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan7,812
 4,830
 5,453
 
 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
 
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,683) 63,830
 11,601
 
 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,423,047
 $1,462,055
 $1,491,241
 $1,438,643
 $1,493,683


Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings, which includes amounts in discontinued operations, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related accrued interest. Whento the balancere-audit and re-review in 2014 of the loan, other receivables and all related accruedour historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on re-measurement of equity interest is equal to or less than our estimate ofupon acquisition, changes in the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interestfinancial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to lease terminations, and including our share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:     
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(52,677) (37,230) (57,307)
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs15,246
 33,608
 12,653
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA(16,396) (10,420) (12,975)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities32,462
 86,278
 32,219
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(1,061) 138
 (612)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(104) (54) (61)
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,981) 54,684
 11,601
Adjusted EBITDA$1,931,588
 $1,961,876
 $1,985,129

NOI

We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a cashconsistent basis. We providedefine NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition

of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies. The following table sets forth a reserve againstreconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:     
Interest and other income(10,984) (24,892) (6,034)
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
General, administrative and professional fees165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Discontinued operations
 10
 110
Other(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,454
 55,034
 561
Income tax benefit(56,310) (39,953) (59,799)
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
NOI$2,051,239
 $2,029,620
 $2,081,652

See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the full period in both comparison periods and are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance. Same-store excludes: (i) properties sold or classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) for properties included in our office operations reportable business segment, those properties for which management has an impaired loanintention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; and (iii) for other assets, those properties (A) that have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period or (B) for which an operator or business model transition has been scheduled after the start of the prior comparison period.  Newly-developed properties in the office operations and triple-net leased properties reportable business segments will be included in same-store if in service for the full period in both periods presented. To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all same-store NOI measures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.

Asset/Liability Management

Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the extentabsolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and available for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total investmentdebt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (Dollars in thousands)
Balance:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes$8,584,056
 $7,945,598
 $8,218,369
Unsecured term loans200,000
 400,000
 200,000
Secured revolving construction credit facility160,492
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
1,325,854
 698,136
 1,010,517
Variable rate:     
Senior notes231,018
 
 400,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility120,787
 765,919
 535,832
Unsecured term loans385,030
 500,000
 700,000
Commercial paper notes567,450
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 90,488
 2,868
Mortgage loans and other(1)
671,115
 429,561
 298,047
Total$12,245,802
 $10,829,702
 $11,365,633
Percent of total debt:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes70.1% 73.4% 72.3%
Unsecured term loans1.6
 3.7
 1.8
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
10.8
 6.4
 8.9
Variable rate:     
Senior notes1.9
 
 3.5
Unsecured revolving credit facility1.0
 7.1
 4.7
Unsecured term loans3.1
 4.6
 6.2
Commercial paper notes4.7
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 0.8
 0.0
Mortgage loans and other(1)
5.5
 4.0
 2.6
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:     
Fixed rate:     
Senior notes3.7% 3.8% 3.7%
Unsecured term loans2.0
 2.8
 2.1
Secured revolving construction credit facility4.5
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
3.7
 4.4
 5.2
Variable rate:     
Senior notes2.5
 
 2.3
Unsecured revolving credit facility2.4
 3.2
 2.3
Unsecured term loans2.9
 3.3
 2.3
Commercial paper notes2.0
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility
 4.1
 3.1
Mortgage loans and other(1)
3.4
 3.4
 2.9
Total3.5
 3.7
 3.6
(1)
Excludes mortgage debt of $57.4 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 which was included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The variable rate debt in the loan exceedstable above reflects, in part, the effect of $147.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 2022 to May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $505.1 million and C$119.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from August 2020 to December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.     

The increase in our estimateoutstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018 is primarily attributable to the assumption of mortgage debt related to the LGM Acquisition and our November 2019 issuance of floating rate senior notes.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2019, interest expense on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $19.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted common share.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $228.2 million and $100.9 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated entities, which was $60.6 million and $40.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally affect the fair value, but not our earnings or cash flows. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.

To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Gross book value10,270,402
 $9,043,734
Fair value10,784,441
 8,926,280
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:   
-100 basis points11,438,507
 9,574,799
+100 basis points10,196,943
 8,568,149

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019 was due primarily to 2019 senior note issuances, net of repayments, and the assumption of mortgage debt related to the LGM Acquisition.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $710.5 million and $479.4 million, respectively. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” and “NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS” of the loan collateral.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2019 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 2019 would decrease or increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 0.1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.


Concentration and Credit Risk

We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
 
As of
December 31,
 2019 2018
Investment mix by asset type(1):
   
Seniors housing communities62.2% 61.6%
MOBs19.3
 20.4
Research and innovation centers8.7
 8.1
Health systems5.1
 5.6
IRFs and LTACs1.6
 1.7
SNFs0.7
 0.8
Secured loans receivable and investments, net2.4
 1.8
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
   
Atria20.4% 22.1%
Sunrise10.3
 11.0
Brookdale Senior Living7.7
 8.4
Ardent4.7
 5.2
Kindred1.0
 1.1
All other55.9
 52.2

(1)
Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:     
Revenues(1):
     
Senior living operations55.8% 55.3% 51.6%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7
 4.3
 4.7
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 3.1
Kindred3.3
 3.5
 4.7
All others33.1
 33.8
 35.9
Adjusted EBITDA:     
Senior living operations32.5% 31.3% 28.7%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.1
 6.7
 7.6
Ardent5.4
 5.1
 5.1
Kindred5.8
 5.6
 7.7
All others48.2
 51.3
 50.9
NOI:     
Senior living operations31.1% 30.7% 28.5%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.7
 7.6
 8.0
Ardent5.8
 5.7
 5.3
Kindred6.3
 6.4
 8.1
All others48.1
 49.6
 50.1
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
     
California15.9% 15.7% 15.3%
New York8.8
 8.4
 8.6
Texas6.0
 6.2
 5.8
Pennsylvania4.7
 4.6
 4.2
Florida4.0
 4.4
 4.4
All others60.6
 60.7
 61.7

(1)
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2)
Results exclude two seniors housing communities in 2019 and 2018 and one seniors housing community in 2017 included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3)
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniors housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2019, 60.3% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter term leases and changing economic or market conditions.



The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We recognize incomeregularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniors housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.

Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from rent, lease terminationus, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, development services,to provide accurate property-level financials results in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management advisory servicesagreements and all other income whenapplicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s and Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our 34% ownership interests in Atria entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, including the right to appoint two of six members to the Atria Board of Directors.    

Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations

Any failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


The following criteriatable summarizes our triple-net lease expirations currently scheduled to occur over the next 10 years (excluding leases related to assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019):
 
Number of
Properties
 2019 Annual Rental Income % of 2019 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
 (Dollars in thousands)
20201
 $4,425
 0.6%
20218
 6,543
 0.8
20229
 10,777
 1.4
20236
 30,506
 3.9
202429
 16,747
 2.1
2025180
 315,596
 40.4
202636
 56,515
 7.2
20273
 6,857
 0.9
202866
 114,344
 14.6
202921
 25,284
 3.2

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During 2019, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our commercial paper program, proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.

For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are metto: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt; (iv) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments and any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our significant financing activities.

Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans

Our unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, as of December 31, 2019. The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.

In January 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), established an unsecured commercial paper program. Under the terms of the program, we may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2019, $567.5 million was outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2019, $120.8 million was outstanding under the unsecured revolving credit facility with an additional $24.0 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured

revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity and to support our commercial paper program. Including these internal limits, we had $2.3 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a $200.0 million unsecured term loan priced at LIBOR plus 0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.        

As of December 31, 2019, we had a $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility with $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and is primarily used to finance the development of research and innovation centers and other construction projects.

As of December 31, 2019, we had a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.
Senior Notes

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding $7.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Ventas Realty ($500.0 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2019.

Mortgages

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $2.0 billion and $1.1 billion, of which our share was $1.8 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.

Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

Derivatives and Hedging

In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.

Dividends

In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2020.

We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or

distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.

Capital Expenditures

The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.

To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.

We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2019, we had 22 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.

Equity Offerings

From time to time, we may sell our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). In August 2018, we replaced our expired ATM program with an identical program, under which we may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $66.75 per share. As of December 31, 2019, $822.1 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM program.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold no shares of our common stock under our ATM program.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$131,464
 $188,253
 $(56,789) (30.2)%
Net cash provided by operating activities1,437,783
 1,381,467
 56,316
 4.1
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (1,909,795) nm
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) 1,922,611
 nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 2,295
 nm
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 14,638
 11.1

nm—not meaningful

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities increased $56.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019 over the same period in 2018 due primarily to higher NOI in 2019 including the impact of property acquisitions and lease-up of new developments, partially offset by asset dispositions, and lower merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2019.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities decreased $1.9 billion during 2019 over 2018 primarily due to increased acquisition and investment activity together with decreased real estate dispositions.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities increased $1.9 billion during 2019 over 2018 primarily due to the 2019 issuance of common stock and increased net borrowings in 2019.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2019:
 Total 
Less than 1 year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
 (In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$15,591,539
 $1,296,990
 $2,607,408
 $3,799,947
 $7,887,194
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations803,659
 28,826
 90,930
 38,902
 645,001
Total$16,395,198
 $1,325,816
 $2,698,338
 $3,838,849
 $8,532,195

(1)
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2)
Interest on variable rate debt based on rates as of December 31, 2019.
(3)
Includes $567.5 million of borrowings outstanding on our commercial paper program.
(4)
Includes $120.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.25% senior notes due 2022, $231.0 million outstanding principal amount of our floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022.
(5)
Includes $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023, $211.8 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $400.0 million

outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $462.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024.
(6)
Includes $385.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025 and $5.4 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 2025 and 2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2023 and 2028.

As of December 31, 2019, we had $12.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonable reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.

ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules


Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2019.
In September 2019, the Company acquired an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”). As permitted under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i)guidelines, the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii)Company excluded from the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.

Allowances

We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibilityeffectiveness of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables)its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, internal control over financial reporting of the operations of these acquired assets. Total assets and total revenues related to these operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on several factors,the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on an operator-by-operator basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company will be unable to collect substantially all triple-net rents, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. The assessment is subjective and required complex auditor judgment to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions, including among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the expected operating performance of the leased property.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the relevant data inputs and assumptions in the collectibility assessment. To assess the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant and property financial information, tenant guarantees, the existence of outstanding accounts receivable, and the remaining term of the lease in the triple net collectibility assessment. We assessed the Company’s ability to estimate probability of collections by testing the reliability of the Company’s historical determinations.

Evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles

As discussed in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired approximately $2 billion of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2019. The purchase price was allocated to the real estate assets acquired, primarily buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles on a relative fair value basis.

We identified the evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles as a critical audit matter. The recorded value of investment in real estate, specifically buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, was sensitive to changes to the inputs and assumptions in the purchase price allocation. This resulted in a higher degree of subjectivity and required complex auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s purchase price allocation over buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles. We evaluated the Company’s inputs and assumptions that were used to determine relative fair value by 1) identifying and considering the relevancy, reliability, and sufficiency of the sources of data used by the Company in developing the assumptions, 2) comparing to relevant industry market data, and 3) where relevant, performing a retrospective analysis of the assumptions used in prior acquisitions. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in performing an assessment of the purchase price allocation to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, including the comparison to relevant market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Chicago, Illinois
February 21, 2020



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company acquired an interest in certain real estate assets through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice during 2019, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, the internal control over financial reporting of the operations of the acquired assets (LGM Operations). Total assets and total revenues related to LGM Operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of LGM Operations.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois February 21, 2020












VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets   
Real estate investments:   
Land and improvements$2,283,929
 $2,114,406
Buildings and improvements24,380,440
 22,437,243
Construction in progress461,354
 422,334
Acquired lease intangibles1,306,152
 1,502,955
Operating lease assets385,225
 
 28,817,100
 26,476,938
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(7,088,013) (6,383,281)
Net real estate property21,729,087
 20,093,657
Secured loans receivable and investments, net704,612
 495,869
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities45,022
 48,378
Net real estate investments22,478,721
 20,637,904
Cash and cash equivalents106,363
 72,277
Escrow deposits and restricted cash39,739
 59,187
Goodwill1,051,161
 1,050,548
Assets held for sale91,433
 5,454
Deferred income tax assets, net47,495
 
Other assets877,296
 759,185
Total assets$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
Liabilities and equity   
Liabilities:   
Senior notes payable and other debt$12,158,773
 $10,733,699
Accrued interest111,115
 99,667
Operating lease liabilities251,196
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,145,700
 1,086,030
Liabilities related to assets held for sale5,463
 205
Deferred income tax liabilities200,831
 205,219
Total liabilities13,873,078
 12,124,820
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests273,678
 188,141
Commitments and contingencies

 

Equity:   
Ventas stockholders’ equity:   
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
 
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 372,811 and 356,572 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively93,185
 89,125
Capital in excess of par value14,056,453
 13,076,528
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(34,564) (19,582)
Retained earnings (deficit)(3,669,050) (2,930,214)
Treasury stock, 2 and 0 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively(132) 
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,445,892
 10,215,857
Noncontrolling interests99,560
 55,737
Total equity10,545,452
 10,271,594
Total liabilities and equity$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
  See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues     
Rental income:     
Triple-net leased$780,898
 $737,796
 $840,131
Office828,978
 776,011
 753,467
 1,609,876
 1,513,807
 1,593,598
Resident fees and services2,151,533
 2,069,477
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenue11,156
 13,416
 13,677
Income from loans and investments89,201
 124,218
 117,608
Interest and other income10,984
 24,892
 6,034
Total revenues3,872,750
 3,745,810
 3,574,149
Expenses     
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Property-level operating expenses:     
Senior living1,521,398
 1,446,201
 1,250,065
Office260,249
 243,679
 233,007
Triple-net leased26,561
 
 
 1,808,208
 1,689,880
 1,483,072
Office building services costs2,319
 1,418
 3,391
General, administrative and professional fees165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Other(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Total expenses3,513,331
 3,360,985
 2,989,438
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 584,711
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) (561)
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 717,273
Income tax benefit56,310
 39,953
 59,799
Income from continuing operations439,297
 415,991
 1,361,222
Discontinued operations
 (10) (110)
Net income439,297
 415,981
 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Earnings per common share     
Basic:     
Income from continuing operations$1.20
 $1.17
 $3.83
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.18
 1.15
 3.82
Diluted:     
Income from continuing operations$1.19
 $1.16
 $3.80
Net income attributable to common stockholders1.17
 1.14
 3.78
  See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Other comprehensive (loss) income:     
Foreign currency translation5,729
 (9,436) 20,612
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities11,634
 14,944
 (437)
Derivative instruments(30,814) 10,030
 2,239
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(13,451) 15,538
 22,414
Comprehensive income425,846
 431,519
 1,383,526
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests7,649

6,514

4,642
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$418,197
 $425,005
 $1,378,884
See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
 
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 Total Equity
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2017$88,514
 $12,917,002
 $(57,534) $(2,487,695) $(47) $10,460,240
 $68,513
 $10,528,753
Net income
 
 
 1,356,470
 
 1,356,470
 4,642
 1,361,112
Other comprehensive income
 
 22,414
 
 
 22,414
 
 22,414
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 107
 
 
 
 107
 
 107
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (1,427) 
 
 
 (1,427) (13,292) (14,719)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.115 per share
 
 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473)
Issuance of common stock276
 72,618
 
 
 553
 73,447
 
 73,447
Issuance of common stock for stock plans87
 21,723
 
 
 796
 22,606
 
 22,606
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (850) 
 
 
 (850) 6,096
 5,246
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 253
 
 
 
 253
 
 253
Redemption of OP and Class C Units84
 19,845
 
 
 3,207
 23,136
 
 23,136
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures68
 23,786
 
 
 (4,551) 19,303
 
 19,303
Balance at December 31, 201789,029
 13,053,057
 (35,120) (2,240,698) (42) 10,866,226
 65,959
 10,932,185
Net income
 
 
 409,467
 
 409,467
 6,514
 415,981
Other comprehensive income
 
 15,538
 
 
 15,538
 
 15,538
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (7,470) 
 
 
 (7,470) (16,736) (24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share
 
 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans and other49
 11,542
 
 
 1,318
 12,909
 
 12,909
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (3,323) 
 
 
 (3,323) 
 (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units3
 (383) 
 
 252
 (128) 
 (128)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures44
 23,105
 
 
 (1,528) 21,621
 
 21,621
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
 
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
Balance at December 31, 201889,125
 13,076,528
 (19,582) (2,930,214) 
 10,215,857
 55,737
 10,271,594
Net income
 
 
 433,016
 
 433,016
 6,281
 439,297
Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
 (14,819) 
 
 (14,819) 1,368
 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (12,332) 
 
 
 (12,332) 36,174
 23,842
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share
 
 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829
 938,509
 
 
 
 942,338
 
 942,338
Issuance of common stock for stock plans152

64,581





6,587
 71,320
 
 71,320
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (7,388) 
 
 
 (7,388) 
 (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units1
 (739) 
 
 
 (738) 
 (738)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures78
 (2,706) 
 
 (6,719) (9,347) 
 (9,347)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
 
 (163) 801
 
 638
 
 638
Balance at December 31, 2019$93,185
 $14,056,453
 $(34,564) $(3,669,050) $(132) $10,445,892
 $99,560
 $10,545,452
   See accompanying notes.
VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(7,967) (30,660) (20,537)
Other non-cash amortization22,985
 18,886
 16,058
Stock-based compensation33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Straight-lining of rental income(30,073) 13,396
 (23,134)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Gain on real estate loan investments
 (13,202) (124)
Income tax benefit(58,918) (43,026) (63,599)
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,464
 55,034
 3,588
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities1,600
 2,934
 4,676
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters
 52,510
 4,616
Other13,264
 3,720
 4,624
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Increase in other assets(76,693) (23,198) (29,282)
Increase in accrued interest9,737
 4,992
 11,068
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities26,666
 (37,509) (35,259)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,437,783
 1,381,467
 1,428,752
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Net investment in real estate property(958,125) (265,907) (664,684)
Investment in loans receivable(1,258,187) (229,534) (748,119)
Proceeds from real estate disposals147,855
 353,792
 859,874
Proceeds from loans receivable1,017,309
 911,540
 101,097
Development project expenditures(403,923) (330,876) (299,085)
Capital expenditures(156,724) (131,858) (132,558)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities172
 57,455
 6,169
Investment in unconsolidated entities(3,855) (47,007) (61,220)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims30,179
 6,891
 1,419
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (937,107)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities(569,891) 321,463
 384,783
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program565,524
 
 
Proceeds from debt3,013,191
 2,549,473
 1,111,649
Repayment of debt(2,623,916) (3,465,579) (1,369,084)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 (4,724) (15,809)
Payment of deferred financing costs(21,403) (20,612) (27,297)
Issuance of common stock, net942,085
 
 73,596
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,157,720) (1,127,143) (827,285)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(9,218) (7,459) (5,677)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(2,203) (1,370) 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests6,282
 1,883
 4,402
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(9,717) (11,574) (11,187)
Proceeds from stock option exercises36,179
 8,762
 16,287
Other(8,519) (5,057) (5,705)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) (671,327)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash13,158
 (55,974) (179,682)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 581
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year131,464
 188,253
 367,354
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 $188,253

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts$410,584
 $406,907
 $409,890
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:     
Real estate investments$1,057,138
 $94,280
 $425,906
Other assets11,140
 5,398
 (3,716)
Debt907,746
 30,508
 75,231
Other liabilities47,121
 18,086
 70,878
Deferred income tax liability95
 922
 (14,869)
Noncontrolling interests113,316
 2,591
 4,202
Equity issued
 30,487
 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127
 907
 24,002
See accompanying notes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2019, we owned approximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), research and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems. We had 22 properties under development, including 4 properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

We primarily invest in seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers.

As of December 31, 2019, we leased a total of 412 properties (excluding properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our 3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 122 properties (excluding 2 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 11 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”) to manage 406 seniors housing communities for us.

Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding LP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:

the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in research and innovation projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Assets Total Liabilities
  (In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P. $666,404
 $244,934
 $673,467
 $238,147
Other identified VIEs 4,075,821
 1,459,830
 2,076,715
 405,350
Tax credit VIEs 845,229
 333,809
 797,077
 297,004


Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under the HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions we receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of NHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2019, third party investors owned 3.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.

Prior to January 2017, we owned a majority interest in Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”) and we consolidated this entity because our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and was the primary beneficiary of this VIE. In January 2017, third party investors redeemed the remaining limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) outstanding. After giving effect to such redemptions, Ventas Realty OP is our wholly owned subsidiary.

As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Units at the greater of cost or redemption value. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the redeemable OP Units was $171.2 million and $174.6 million, respectively. We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Units. Our diluted earnings per share includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.
Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. We include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our research and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”) and/or new markets tax credits (“NMTCs”). As of December 31, 2019, we owned 10 properties, including 1 property in development, that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a nominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the TCI’s investment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s investment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions

When we acquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether the transaction involves an asset or a business. Our real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the underlying collateral,rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.

In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. Where we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of real estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.

If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.

We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, have been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in which a change in classification is determined) to reflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as net real estate investments.

We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

We regularly evaluate the collectability of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recovercollect all amounts due under the full valueterms of the receivable,applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. collected.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Deferred Financing Costs

We baseamortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our assessmentConsolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the collectibilityrelated borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenantapproximately $20.2 million, $18.1 million and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due$18.9 million were included in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable assetinterest expense for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.

Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the yearyears ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Available for Sale Securities

We classify available for sale securities as a REIT. However, with respect to certaincomponent of other assets on our subsidiaries that have elected to be treatedConsolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We report interest income, including discount or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expensepremium amortization, on available for sale securities and gains or benefit, as those entitieslosses on securities sold, which are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.

We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reportingspecific identification method, in income from loans and tax basesinvestments in our Consolidated Statements of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.Income.


Derivative Instruments

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimedall derivative instruments in other assets or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interestaccounts payable and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards

On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a significant impactother liabilities on our Consolidated Financial Statements

In 2014,Balance Sheets at fair value as of the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”, as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applied to other transactions such as the sale of real

estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.

reporting date. We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differencesrecognize changes in the timing, measurement or presentationfair value of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believe the following itemsderivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income are subject to ASC 606: office building andor accumulated other services revenue, certain elements of our resident fees and services and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office building and other services revenues are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary to the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition ofcomprehensive income will be consistent with the current accounting model.

As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 million of deferred gains relating to sales of real estate assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosures in accordance with the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”), which introduces a lessee model that brings most leasesBalance Sheets, depending on the balance sheetintended use of the derivative and among other changes, eliminatesour designation of the requirement in current GAAPinstrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for an entitytrading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASBtheir underlying securities and, therefore, also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02, which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 and the related Exposure Draft are not effective for us until January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us, as both lessor and lessee,recorded on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to utilize the practical expedients proposedBalance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the Exposure Draft as partfair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our adoptionConsolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of ASU 2016-02.

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires an entity to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalentsfair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a retrospective transition method. Adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impactnoncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2016,Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transferschange in fair value of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequencesswap contracts of an intra-entity transfer of an asset,our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impactcomprehensive income on our Consolidated Financial Statements.Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.



Results of Operations

In August 2015, we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT name Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying results of operations. Throughout this discussion, “continuing operations” does not include properties disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”). As a result, we renamed our MOB operations reportable business segment “office operations,” which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we operated through three reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. UnderIn our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOInet operating income (“NOI”) and related measures. For further information regarding our business segments and a discussion of our definition of segment NOI, see “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to NOI.

Years Ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018


The table below shows our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$754,337
 $740,318
 $14,019
 1.9 %
Senior living operations630,135
 623,276
 6,859
 1.1
Office operations574,157
 538,506
 35,651
 6.6
All other92,610
 127,520
 (34,910) (27.4)
Total segment NOI2,051,239
 2,029,620
 21,619
 1.1
Interest and other income10,984
 24,892
 (13,908) (55.9)
Interest expense(451,662) (442,497) (9,165) (2.1)
Depreciation and amortization(1,045,620) (919,639) (125,981) (13.7)
General, administrative and professional fees(165,996) (151,982) (14,014) (9.2)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(41,900) (58,254) 16,354
 28.1
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(15,235) (30,547) 15,312
 50.1
Other17,609
 (66,768) 84,377
 nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 (25,406) (6.6)
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) 52,580
 95.5
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 (20,225) (43.7)
Income tax benefit56,310
 39,953
 16,357
 40.9
Income from continuing operations439,297
 415,991
 23,306
 5.6
Discontinued operations
 (10) 10
 nm
Net income439,297
 415,981
 23,316
 5.6
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 233
 3.6
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 23,549
 5.8
 For the Year Ended
December 31,
 (Decrease) Increase to Net Income
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$844,711
 $850,755
 $(6,044) (0.7)%
Senior living operations593,167
 604,328
 (11,161) (1.8)
Office operations524,566
 444,276
 80,290
 18.1
All other119,208
 101,214
 17,994
 17.8
Total segment NOI2,081,652
 2,000,573
 81,079
 4.1
Interest and other income6,034
 876
 5,158
 nm
Interest expense(448,196) (419,740) (28,456) (6.8)
Depreciation and amortization(887,948) (898,924) 10,976
 1.2
General, administrative and professional fees(135,490) (126,875) (8,615) (6.8)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(754) (2,779) 2,025
 72.9
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(10,535) (24,635) 14,100
 57.2
Other(20,052) (9,988) (10,064) nm
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests584,711
 518,508
 66,203
 12.8
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(561) 4,358
 (4,919) nm
Income tax benefit59,799
 31,343
 28,456
 nm
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 89,740
 16.2
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 812
 nm
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 619,070
 nm
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 709,622
 nm
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 (2,383) nm
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $649,231
 707,239
 nm


nm—not meaningful



Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties


NOI for our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment equals the rental income and other services revenue earned from our triple-net assets. We incur no direct operating expenses for this segment.

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017,2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Decrease to Segment NOI
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
2017 2016 $ %2019 2018 $ %
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:              
Rental income$840,131
 $845,834
 $(5,703) (0.7)%$780,898
 $737,796
 $43,102
 5.8%
Other services revenue4,580
 4,921
 (341) (6.9)
 2,522
 (2,522) nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(26,561) 
 (26,561) nm
Segment NOI$844,711
 $850,755
 (6,044) (0.7)$754,337
 $740,318
 14,019
 1.9
Triple-net leased properties segment NOI decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due the sale of 36 Kindred SNF properties during 2017, partially offset by rent increases due to contractual escalations pursuant to the terms of our leases and rent from eight seniors housing communities that we transitioned from senior living operations to triple-net leased properties during 2017.nm—not meaningful

In our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, our revenues generally consist of fixed rental amounts (subject to annual contractual escalations) received from our tenants in accordance with the applicable lease terms. However, occupancy

Pursuant to our adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we now report revenues and property-level operating expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate tax and insurance expenses that are paid from escrows collected from our tenants. For further information regarding our adoption of ASC 842, see “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2019 over the prior year primarily due to the second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to the Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and net increases in rent, partially offset by fewer assets in the portfolio due to dispositions and operator transitions of seniors housing communities from triple-net leased properties to senior living operations.

Occupancy rates may affect the profitability of our tenants’ operations. The following table sets forth average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 20172019 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 20172019 (which is the most recent information available to us from our tenants) and average continuing occupancy rates related to the triple-net leased properties we owned at December 31, 20162018 for the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2016.2018. The table excludes non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities, certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information and properties acquired or properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have a full four quarters of occupancy results.
Number of Properties at December 31, 2017 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2017 (1)
  
Number of Properties at December 31, 2016 (1)
 
Average Occupancy
for the Trailing 12 Months
Ended September 30,
2016 (1)
Number of Properties at December 31, 2019 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2019  Number of Properties at December 31, 2018 Average Occupancy for the Trailing 12 Months Ended September 30, 2018
Seniors housing communities418
 86.6%  431
 88.2%326
 86.0%  361
 85.0%
SNFs17
 86.4
  53
 79.9
Skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”)16
 87.3
  17
 85.2
IRFs and LTACs36
 60.4
  38
 59.1
36
 53.6
  36
 56.5

(1)
Excludes properties included in discontinued operations and properties classified as held for sale, non-stabilized properties, properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and certain properties for which we do not receive occupancy information. Also excludes properties acquired during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and properties that transitioned operators for which we do not have eight full quarters of results subsequent to the transition.


The following table compares results of operations for our 494393 same-store triple-net leased properties. See “Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresNOI” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure regarding same-store NOI.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$749,561
 $688,914
 $60,647
 8.8%
Less: Property-level operating expenses(25,180) 
 (25,180) nm
Segment NOI$724,381
 $688,914
 35,467
 5.1

nm—not meaningful
The increase in our same-store triple-net leased properties unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regardrental income in 2019 over the prior year is attributable primarily to our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refersthe second quarter 2018 non-cash expense of $21.3 million related to properties owned, consolidated, operationalthe Brookdale Senior Living lease extensions and reported under a consistent business model for the full periodnet increases in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.rent.


 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$769,063
 $760,848
 $8,215
 1.1%
Segment NOI$769,063
 $760,848
 8,215
 1.1

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations


The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017,2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Decrease to Segment NOI
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
2017 2016 $ %2019 2018 $ %
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:              
Resident fees and services$1,843,232
 $1,847,306
 $(4,074) (0.2)%$2,151,533
 $2,069,477
 $82,056
 4.0 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,250,065) (1,242,978) (7,087) (0.6)(1,521,398) (1,446,201) (75,197) (5.2)
Segment NOI$593,167
 $604,328
 (11,161) (1.8)$630,135
 $623,276
 6,859
 1.1
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Total communities293
 298
 88.3% 90.3% $5,725
 $5,474
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total communities401
 355
 86.6% 87.0% $5,451
 $5,699
    
Resident fees and services include all amounts earned from residents at our seniors housing communities, such as rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary service income. Our senior living operations segment revenues decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to the transition of eight seniors housing communities to our triple-net leased properties segment and decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses related to our senior living operations segment include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other costs of operating the properties. Property-level operating expenses increased

The increase in our senior living operations segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year over yearis attributable primarily due to the acquisition of an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”), partially offset by decreases in occupancy and increases in salaries, benefits, insurance and otherproperty-level operating expenses and the implementation of new care technologies.expenses.


The following table compares results of operations for our 285340 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjustedcommunities.
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,990,057
 $1,989,104
 $953
 nm
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,401,208) (1,376,142) (25,066) (1.8)
Segment NOI$588,849
 $612,962
 (24,113) (3.9)

nm—not meaningful

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Years Ended
December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store communities340
 340
 86.5% 87.2% $5,787
 $5,733

The decrease in our same-store senior living operations segment NOI was primarily attributable to increases in property-level operating expenses and decreases in occupancy.

Effective January 1, 2020, we amended the same-store definition for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard to our senior living operations segment “same-store” refersin order to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full periodbetter align with industry practice. Going forward, among other changes, redevelopments in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the start of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whoseour senior living operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,791,843
 $1,765,183
 $26,660
 1.5 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,215,440) (1,187,351) (28,089) (2.4)
Segment NOI$576,403
 $577,832
 (1,429) (0.2)

segment that are considered materially disruptive will be excluded from the same-store pool until they meet the definition for subsequent inclusion. If this policy had been in place for 2019, same-store senior living operations results would have been based on same-store communities of 334 while the year-over-year change in same-store segment NOI would have remained substantially unchanged at (3.9%).
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy
for the Year Ended
December 31,
 
Average Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Same-store communities285
 285
 88.3% 90.4% $5,745
 $5,526


Segment NOI—Office Operations


The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017,2019, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
2017 2016 $ %2019 2018 $ %
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:              
Rental income$753,467
 $630,342
 $123,125
 19.5 %$828,978
 $776,011
 $52,967
 6.8 %
Office building services revenue7,497
 13,029
 (5,532) (42.5)7,747
 7,592
 155
 2.0
Total revenues760,964
 643,371
 117,593
 18.3
836,725
 783,603
 53,122
 6.8
Less:              
Property-level operating expenses(233,007) (191,784) (41,223) (21.5)(260,249) (243,679) (16,570) (6.8)
Office building services costs(3,391) (7,311) 3,920
 53.6
(2,319) (1,418) (901) (63.5)
Segment NOI$524,566
 $444,276
 80,290
 18.1
$574,157
 $538,506
 35,651
 6.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Total office buildings391
 388
 92.0% 91.7% $32
 $31
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Total office buildings382
 387
 90.3% 90.1% $34
 $32
    
The increase in our office operations segment rental incomeNOI in 20172019 over the prior year is attributedattributable primarily to the office buildings we acquired during 2017 and 2016, partially offset by dispositions. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired office buildings and2019 increases in real estate taxesoccupancy and other operating expenses,2018 and 2019 acquisitions and openings of new buildings, partially offset by dispositions.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2017 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2017 compared to 2016.     


The following table compares results of operations for our 350353 same-store office buildings. With regard to
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$723,229
 $709,714
 $13,515
 1.9 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(224,072) (218,272) (5,800) (2.7)
Segment NOI$499,157
 $491,442
 7,715
 1.6
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018
Same-store office buildings353
 353
 92.1% 91.9% $33
 $32
The increase in our same-store office operations segment “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full periodNOI in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$558,575
 $552,045
 $6,530
 1.2 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(169,583) (164,987) (4,596) (2.8)
Segment NOI$388,992
 $387,058
 1,934
 0.5

 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Same-store office buildings350
 350
 91.3% 92.0% $31
 $30
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 20172019 over the prior year dueis attributable primarily to increases in occupancy.



All Other

Information provided for all other segment NOI includes income from new loans issued duringand investments and other miscellaneous income not directly attributable to any of our three reportable business segments. The $34.9 million decrease in all other segment NOI in 2019 over the prior year is primarily due to reduced income related to the $700.0 million term loan that we made to Ardent in March 2017, which was fully repaid in June 2018, partially offset by decreased interest income attributableincreased 2019 investment activity. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” of the Notes to loan repayments received during 2016 and 2017.Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Interest and other income


InterestThe $13.9 million decrease in interest and other income increased $5.2 million in 20172019 over the prior year asis primarily due to a result$12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of fees received from a tenant2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions. See “NOTE 3-CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in 2017 which were not associated with a lease agreement.Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Interest Expense


The $28.5$9.2 million increase in total interest expense in 2019 over the prior year is attributed primarily attributable to a $17.1an increase of $17.9 million increase in interest due to higher debt balances and an $11.3decreased capitalized interest, partially offset by a decrease of $10.7 million increase due to highera lower effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments.rate. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.7%3.8% for 2017,2019, compared to 3.6%3.9% for 2016.2018. Capitalized interest for 2019 and 2018 was $9.0 million and $10.9 million, respectively.


Depreciation and Amortization


Depreciation and amortization expense related to continuing operations decreasedincreased during 20172019 compared to 2016,2018, primarily due to a decrease in amortization related to certain lease intangibles that were fully amortized during the third quarterreal estate impairments and asset acquisitions, net of 2016, partially offset by a full year of depreciation and amortization related to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.dispositions.


Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net


The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2017 resulted2019 was due primarily fromto the redemption and repayment of term loans and the replacement$600.0 million aggregate principal amounts then outstanding of our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility.4.25% senior notes due 2022. The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 20162018 was due primarily to ourthe redemption and repayment of $550.0 million$1.3 billion aggregate principal amountamounts then outstanding of our 1.55%4.00% senior notes due 20162019 and term loan repayments in 2016.our 4.75% senior notes due 2021.


Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs


Merger-related expenses and deal costs consist of transition, integration, deal and severance-related expenses primarily related to pending and consummated transactions required by GAAP to be expensed rather than capitalized into the asset value. The $14.1$15.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 20172019 over the prior year was due primarily to costs associated with the 2018 transition of the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living.

Other

The $84.4 million change in other for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

Other

The $10.1 million increase in other for 2017 over 2016 is primarily due to charges2019 property insurance recoveries related to natural disasters. We have insurance coveragedisasters in addition to mitigate the financial impact of these types of events. However, there can be no assurance regarding the amount or timing of any insurance recoveries. Such recoveries will be recognized when collection is deemed probable.2018 impairments and expenses related to natural disasters.


IncomeLoss from Unconsolidated Entities


The $4.9$52.6 million decrease in incomeloss from unconsolidated entities for 20172019 over 20162018 is primarily due to our share of net losses related to certainimproved financial results from our unconsolidated entities in 2017 partially offset by2019 and a $35.7 million impairment in 2018 relating to the February 2017 fair value re-measurementcarrying costs of one of our previously held equity interest, resultingmethod investments consisting principally of SNFs.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $20.2 million decrease in a gain on re-measurement of $3.0 million. Referreal estate dispositions for 2019 over 2018 is due primarily to “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements includedhigher disposition activity in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

2018.

Income Tax Benefit


The 2017$16.4 million increase in income tax benefit related to continuing operations for 2019 over 2018 is primarily due to accounting fora $57.6 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by the reversal of a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards in the fourth quarter of 2018. The $23.3 million valuation allowance reversal recorded in 2018 was an adjustment to the provisional amount recorded in the prior year related to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5 million benefit fromand was made based upon additional guidance issued by the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 millionInternal Revenue Service subsequent to establish a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, losses of certain TRS entities and the release of a tax reserve. The 2016 income tax benefit was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.enactment.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The increase of $619.1 million in gain on real estate dispositions for 2017 over 2016 is due primarily to the sale of 36 Kindred SNFs in 2017.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2.4 million for 2017 over 2016 is primarily due to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.
Years Ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017


The table below showsOur Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, contains information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 and the effect of changes in those results from period to period on our net income attributable to common stockholders.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI:       
Triple-net leased properties$850,755
 $784,234
 $66,521
 8.5 %
Senior living operations604,328
 601,840
 2,488
 0.4
Office operations444,276
 399,891
 44,385
 11.1
All other101,214
 89,176
 12,038
 13.5
Total segment NOI2,000,573
 1,875,141
 125,432
 6.7
Interest and other income876
 1,052
 (176) (16.7)
Interest expense(419,740) (367,114) (52,626) (14.3)
Depreciation and amortization(898,924) (894,057) (4,867) (0.5)
General, administrative and professional fees(126,875) (128,035) 1,160
 0.9
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net(2,779) (14,411) 11,632
 80.7
Merger-related expenses and deal costs(24,635) (102,944) 78,309
 76.1
Other(9,988) (17,957) 7,969
 44.4
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interest518,508
 351,675
 166,833
 47.4
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities4,358
 (1,420) 5,778
 nm
Income tax benefit31,343
 39,284
 (7,941) (20.2)
Income from continuing operations554,209
 389,539
 164,670
 42.3
Discontinued operations(922) 11,103
 (12,025) nm
Gain on real estate dispositions98,203
 18,580
 79,623
 nm
Net income651,490
 419,222
 232,268
 55.4
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests2,259
 1,379
 (880) (63.8)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$649,231
 $417,843
 231,388
 55.4

nm—not meaningful 

Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties

The following table summarizes results of operations in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$845,834
 $779,801
 $66,033
 8.5%
Other services revenue4,921
 4,433
 488
 11.0
Segment NOI$850,755
 $784,234
 66,521
 8.5
Triple-net leased properties segment NOI increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to rent from the properties we acquired and developed during 2016 and 2015, contractual escalations in rent pursuant to the terms of our leases, and increases in base and other rent under certain of our leases, partially offset by 2015 lease termination fees.

The following table compares results of operations for our 511 same-store triple-net leased properties, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between comparison periods. With regard to our triple-net leased properties segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Triple-Net Leased Properties:       
Rental income$695,124
 $673,706
 $21,418
 3.2%
Segment NOI$695,124
 $673,706
 21,418
 3.2

Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our senior living operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Resident fees and services$1,847,306
 $1,811,255
 $36,051
 2.0 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,242,978) (1,209,415) (33,563) (2.8)
Segment NOI$604,328
 $601,840
 2,488
 0.4
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Total communities298
 305
 90.3% 91.2% $5,474
 $5,255

Resident fees and services increased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to seniors housing communities we acquired during 2015 and an increase in average monthly revenue per occupied room, partially offset by decreased occupancy at our seniors housing communities.

Property-level operating expenses also increased year over year primarily due to the acquired properties described above and increases in salaries, bonus, benefits, insurance, real estate tax expenses and other operating expenses.

The following table compares results of operations for our 262 same-store senior living operating communities, unadjusted for foreign currency movements between periods. With regard to our senior living operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties that we owned and were operational for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding properties that transitioned operators since the start of the prior comparison period, assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Senior Living Operations:       
Total revenues$1,667,279
 $1,617,757
 $49,522
 3.1 %
Less: Property-level operating expenses(1,116,109) (1,077,510) (38,599) (3.6)
Segment NOI$551,170
 $540,247
 10,923
 2.0
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Average Unit
Occupancy for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 
Average
Monthly Revenue Per Occupied Room for
the Year
Ended
December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Same-store communities262
 262
 90.4% 91.1% $5,578
 $5,379

Segment NOI—Office Operations

The following table summarizes results of operations in our office operations reportable business segment, including assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016, but excluding assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations:
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 Increase (Decrease) to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$630,342
 $566,245
 $64,097
 11.3 %
Office building services revenue13,029
 34,436
 (21,407) (62.2)
Total revenues643,371
 600,681
 42,690
 7.1
Less:       
Property-level operating expenses(191,784) (174,225) (17,559) (10.1)
Office building services costs(7,311) (26,565) 19,254
 72.5
Segment NOI$444,276
 $399,891
 44,385
 11.1
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Total office buildings388
 369
 91.7% 91.7% $31
 $29


The increase in our office operations segment rental income in 2016 over the prior year is attributed primarily to the MOBs we acquired during 2016 and 2015 and the Life Sciences Acquisition, as well as in-place lease escalations. The increase in our office building property-level operating expenses is due primarily to those acquired MOBs and life science and innovation centers and increases in real estate taxes and other operating expenses.

Office building services revenue and costs both decreased in 2016 over the prior year primarily due to decreased construction activity during 2016 compared to 2015.

The following table compares results of operations for our 272 same-store office buildings. With regard to our office operations segment, “same-store” refers to properties owned, consolidated, operational and reported under a consistent business model for the full period in both comparison periods, excluding assets sold or classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 and assets whose operations were classified as discontinued operations.
 
For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Segment NOI
 2016 2015 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Same-Store Segment NOI—Office Operations:       
Rental income$432,657
 $434,022
 $(1,365) (0.3)%
Less: Property-level operating expenses(142,826) (144,218) 1,392
 1.0
Segment NOI$289,831
 $289,804
 27
 0.0
 
Number of
Properties at
December 31,
 
Occupancy at
December 31,
 Annualized Average Rent Per Occupied Square Foot for the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Same-store office buildings272
 272
 90.6% 91.2% $31
 $31
Segment NOI - All Other

All other increased in 2016 over the prior year due primarily to a February 2016 $140.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment that has an annual interest rate of 9.95%, partially offset by decreased interest income due to loans repaid during 2016.

Interest Expense

The $7.8 million decrease in total interest expense, including interest allocated to discontinued operations of $60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, is attributed primarily to an $11.5 million reduction in interest due to lower debt balances, partially offset by a $3.7 million increase due to higher effective interest rates, including the amortization of any fair value adjustments. Our effective interest rate was 3.63% for 2016, compared to 3.60% for 2015.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt, Net

The loss on extinguishment of debt, net in 2016 and 2015 resulted primarily from various debt repayments we made to improve our credit profile. The 2016 activity related to the redemption and repayment of the $550.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due 2016 and term loan repayments. The 2015 repayments were made primarily with proceeds from the distribution paid to us at the time of the CCP Spin-Off.

Merger-Related Expenses and Deal Costs

The $78.3 million decrease in merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2016 over the prior year is primarily due to the January 2015 acquisition of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. and the August 2015 acquisition of Ardent Health Services, Inc., partially offset by costs incurred relating to the September 2016 Life Sciences Acquisition.

Income Tax Benefit

Income tax benefit for 2016 was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve. Income tax benefit for 2015 was due primarily to the income tax benefit of ordinary losses of certain TRS entities. The TRS losses were mainly attributable to the depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets recorded as deferred tax liabilities in purchase accounting.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations for 2016 reflects $0.9 million of separation costs relating to the CCP Spin-Off. Discontinued operations for 2015 are primarily the result of $46.4 million of transaction and separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off and net income for the CCP operations from January 1, 2015 through August 17, 2015, the date of the CCP Spin-Off.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions

The $79.6 million increase in gain on real estate dispositions in 2016 over the same period in 2015 primarily relates to the 2016 sale of one triple-net leased property.


Non-GAAP Financial Measures


We consider certain non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded from or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.


The non-GAAP financial measures we present in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to those presented by other real estate companies due to the fact that not all real estate companies use the same definitions. You should not consider these measures as alternatives to net income or income from continuing operations (both determinedattributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as measures of our liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, you should examine these measures in conjunction with net income and income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations


Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. However, since real estate values historically have risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors deem presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. For that reason, we consider Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and normalized FFO to be appropriate supplemental measures of operating performance of an equity REIT. In particular, we believe that normalized FFO is useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to compare our operating performance to the operating performance of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis without having to account for differences caused by non-recurring items and other non-operational events such as transactions and litigation. In some cases, we provide information about identified non-cash components of FFO and normalized FFO because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess the impact of those items on our financial results.


We use the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”Nareit”) definition of FFO. NAREITNareit defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate property, including gains or losses on re-measurement of equity method investments, and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. We define normalized FFO as FFO excluding the following income and expense items (which may be recurring in nature): (a) merger-related costs and expenses, including amortization of intangibles, transition and integration expenses, and deal costs and expenses, including expenses and recoveries relating to acquisition lawsuits; (b) the impact of any expenses related to asset impairment and valuation allowances, the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, or

additional costs, expenses, discounts, make-whole payments, penalties or premiums incurred as a result of early retirement or payment of our debt; (c) the non-cash effect of income tax benefits or expenses, the non-cash impact of changes to our executive equity compensation plan, and derivative transactions that have non-cash mark-to-market impacts on our Consolidated Statements of Income;Income and non-cash charges related to lease terminations; (d) the financial impact of contingent consideration, severance-relatedseverance-

related costs and charitable donations made to the Ventas Charitable Foundation; (e) gains and losses for non-operational foreign currency hedge agreements and changes in the fair value of financial instruments; (f) gains and losses on non-real estate dispositions and other unusual items related to unconsolidated entities; (g) expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements and related matters; and (h) net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters.    We believe that income from continuing operations is the most comparable GAAP measure because it provides insight into our continuing operations.    



The following table summarizes our FFO and normalized FFO for each of the five years ended December 31, 2017. Our2019. The decrease in normalized FFO for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased2019 over the prior year is due primarily to improved property performancethe $12.3 million fee received in the third quarter of 2018 related to certain 2018 Kindred transactions and accretive investments.2018 loan repayments and fees.
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015 2014 20132019 2018 2017 2016 2015
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
 $359,296
 $375,498
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
 99,735
 79,171
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
 17,970
 
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
 477,001
 454,669
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
 1,234
 1,160
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
 475,767
 453,509
$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Adjustments:                  
Real estate depreciation and amortization881,088
 891,985
 887,126
 718,649
 624,245
1,039,550
 913,537
 881,088
 891,985
 887,126
Real estate depreciation related to noncontrolling interests(7,565) (7,785) (7,906) (10,314) (10,512)(9,762) (6,926) (7,565) (7,785) (7,906)
Real estate depreciation related to unconsolidated entities4,231
 5,754
 7,353
 5,792
 6,543
187
 1,977
 4,231
 5,754
 7,353
(Gain) loss on real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(1,057) (439) 19
 
 
(1,263) (875) (1,057) (439) 19
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
 
 (1,241)
 
 (3,027) 
 176
Impairment on equity method investment
 35,708
 
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions related to noncontrolling interests18
 
 
 
 
343
 1,508
 18
 
 
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,203) (18,580) (17,970) 
(26,022) (46,247) (717,273) (98,203) (18,580)
Discontinued operations:                  
Loss (gain) on real estate dispositions
 1
 (231) (1,494) (4,059)
 
 
 1
 (231)
Depreciation on real estate assets
 
 79,608
 103,250
 139,973

 
 
 
 79,608
FFO attributable to common stockholders1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
 1,273,680
 1,208,458
1,436,049
 1,308,149
 1,512,885
 1,440,544
 1,365,408
Adjustments:                  
Change in fair value of financial instruments(41) 62
 460
 5,121
 449
(78) (18) (41) 62
 460
Non-cash income tax benefit(22,387) (34,227) (42,384) (9,431) (11,828)(58,918) (18,427) (22,387) (34,227) (42,384)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(36,539) 
 
 
 

 (24,618) (36,539) 
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net839
 2,779
 15,797
 5,013
 1,048
41,900
 63,073
 839
 2,779
 15,797
Gain on non-real estate dispositions related to unconsolidated entities(39) (557) 
 
 
(18) (2) (39) (557) 
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs14,823
 28,290
 152,344
 54,389
 21,560
18,208
 38,145
 14,823
 28,290
 152,344
Amortization of other intangibles1,458
 1,752
 2,058
 1,246
 1,022
484
 759
 1,458
 1,752
 2,058
Other items related to unconsolidated entities3,188
 
 
 
 
3,291
 5,035
 3,188
 
 
Non-cash impact of changes to equity plan5,453
 
 
 
 
7,812
 4,830
 5,453
 
 
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net11,601
 
 
 
 
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
 
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,683) 63,830
 11,601
 
 
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders$1,491,241
 $1,438,643
 $1,493,683
 $1,330,018
 $1,220,709
$1,423,047
 $1,462,055
 $1,491,241
 $1,438,643
 $1,493,683



Adjusted EBITDA


We consider Adjusted EBITDA an important supplemental measure because it provides another manner in which to evaluate our operating performance and serves as another indicator of our credit strength and our ability to service our debt obligations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings, which includes amounts in discontinued operations, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense), excluding gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, our consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA, merger-related expenses and deal costs, expenses related to the re-audit and re-review in 2014 of our historical financial statements, net gains or losses on real estate activity, gains or losses on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses, and net expenses or recoveries related to natural disasters and non-cash charges related to lease terminations, and including our share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities and adjustments for other immaterial or identified items. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:EBITDA:
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:          
Interest448,196
 419,740
 427,542
451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
41,900
 58,254
 754
Taxes (including amounts in general, administrative and professional fees)(57,307) (29,129) (37,112)(52,677) (37,230) (57,307)
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 973,665
1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense26,543
 20,958
 19,537
33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Merger-related expenses, deal costs and re-audit costs12,653
 25,141
 150,290
15,246
 33,608
 12,653
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA(12,975) (12,654) (12,722)
(Income) loss from unconsolidated entities, net of Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities32,219
 25,246
 18,806
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, adjusted for consolidated joint venture partners’ share of EBITDA(16,396) (10,420) (12,975)
Loss from unconsolidated entities, adjusted for Ventas share of EBITDA from unconsolidated entities32,462
 86,278
 32,219
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,202) (18,811)(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Unrealized foreign currency gains(612) (1,440) (1,727)
Unrealized foreign currency (gains) losses(1,061) 138
 (612)
Changes in fair value of financial instruments(61) 51
 460
(104) (54) (61)
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
Natural disaster expenses (recoveries), net11,601
 
 
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Non-cash charges related to lease terminations
 21,299
 
Natural disaster (recoveries) expenses, net(25,981) 54,684
 11,601
Adjusted EBITDA$1,985,129
 $1,900,645
 $1,952,358
$1,931,588
 $1,961,876
 $1,985,129


NOI


We also consider NOI an important supplemental measure because it allows investors, analysts and our management to assess our unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results with those of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis. We define NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. Cash receipts may differ due to straight-line recognition

of certain rental income and the application of other GAAP policies. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income attributable to common stockholders to NOI:

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Adjustments:     
Interest and other income(10,984) (24,892) (6,034)
Interest451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
General, administrative and professional fees165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Discontinued operations
 10
 110
Other(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,454
 55,034
 561
Income tax benefit(56,310) (39,953) (59,799)
Gain on real estate dispositions(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
NOI$2,051,239
 $2,029,620
 $2,081,652
from continuing operations to
See “Results of Operations” for discussions regarding both segment NOI and same-store segment NOI. We define same-store as properties owned, consolidated and operational for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016full period in both comparison periods and 2015:
are not otherwise excluded; provided, however, that we may include selected properties that otherwise meet the same-store criteria if they are included in substantially all of, but not a full, period for one or both of the comparison periods, and in our judgment such inclusion provides a more meaningful presentation of our portfolio performance. Same-store excludes: (i) properties sold or classified as held for sale or properties whose operations were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; (ii) for properties included in our office operations reportable business segment, those properties for which management has an intention to institute a redevelopment plan because the properties may require major property-level expenditures to maximize value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position and/or achieve property stabilization; and (iii) for other assets, those properties (A) that have transitioned operators or business models after the start of the prior comparison period or (B) for which an operator or business model transition has been scheduled after the start of the prior comparison period.  Newly-developed properties in the office operations and triple-net leased properties reportable business segments will be included in same-store if in service for the full period in both periods presented. To eliminate the impact of exchange rate movements, all same-store NOI measures assume constant exchange rates across comparable periods, using the following methodology: the current period’s results are shown in actual reported USD, while prior comparison period’s results are adjusted and converted to USD based on the average exchange rate for the current period.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to common stockholders1,356,470
 649,231
 417,843
Adjustments:     
Interest and other income(6,034) (876) (1,115)
Interest448,196
 419,740
 427,542
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 973,665
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,044
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
Merger-related expenses and deal costs10,645
 25,556
 149,346
Other20,052
 9,988
 19,577
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,499
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities561
 (4,358) 1,420
Income tax benefit(59,799) (31,343) (39,284)
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,202) (18,811)
NOI (including amounts in discontinued operations)2,081,652
 2,000,573
 2,074,137
Discontinued operations
 
 (198,996)
NOI (excluding amounts in discontinued operations)$2,081,652
 $2,000,573
 $1,875,141


Asset/Liability Management


Asset/liability management, a key element of enterprise risk management, is designed to support the achievement of our business strategy, while ensuring that we maintain appropriate and tolerable levels of market risk (primarily interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk) and credit risk. Effective management of these risks is a contributing factor to the absolute levels and variability of our FFO and net worth. The following discussion addresses our integrated management of assets and liabilities, including the use of derivative financial instruments.


Market Risk


We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates with respect to borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans, certain of our mortgage loans that are floating rate obligations, mortgage loans receivable that bear interest at floating rates and marketable debtavailable for sale securities. These market risks result primarily from changes in LIBOR rates or prime rates. To manage these risks, we continuously monitor our level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including our assessment of current and future economic conditions.

The table below sets forth certain information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts.
As of December 31,As of December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
Balance:          
Fixed rate:          
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion$8,218,369
 $7,854,264
 $7,534,459
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan200,000
 200,000
 
Senior notes$8,584,056
 $7,945,598
 $8,218,369
Unsecured term loans200,000
 400,000
 200,000
Secured revolving construction credit facility160,492
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
1,010,517
 1,426,837
 1,554,062
1,325,854
 698,136
 1,010,517
Variable rate:          
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes400,000
 
 
Senior notes231,018
 
 400,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility535,832
 146,538
 180,683
120,787
 765,919
 535,832
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion700,000
 1,271,215
 1,568,477
Unsecured term loans385,030
 500,000
 700,000
Commercial paper notes567,450
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility2,868
 
 

 90,488
 2,868
Mortgage loans and other(1)
298,047
 292,060
 433,339
671,115
 429,561
 298,047
Total$11,365,633
 $11,190,914
 $11,271,020
$12,245,802
 $10,829,702
 $11,365,633
Percent of total debt:          
Fixed rate:          
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion72.3% 70.2% 66.9%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan1.8
 1.8
 
Senior notes70.1% 73.4% 72.3%
Unsecured term loans1.6
 3.7
 1.8
Secured revolving construction credit facility1.3
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
8.9
 12.7
 13.8
10.8
 6.4
 8.9
Variable rate:          
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes3.5
 
 
Senior notes1.9
 
 3.5
Unsecured revolving credit facility4.7
 1.3
 1.6
1.0
 7.1
 4.7
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion6.2
 11.4
 13.9
Unsecured term loans3.1
 4.6
 6.2
Commercial paper notes4.7
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility0.0
 
 

 0.8
 0.0
Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.6
 2.6
 3.8
5.5
 4.0
 2.6
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:          
Fixed rate:          
Senior notes and other, unhedged portion3.7% 3.6% 3.5%
Floating to fixed rate swap on term loan2.1
 2.2
 
Senior notes3.7% 3.8% 3.7%
Unsecured term loans2.0
 2.8
 2.1
Secured revolving construction credit facility4.5
 
 
Mortgage loans and other(1)
5.2
 5.6
 5.7
3.7
 4.4
 5.2
Variable rate:          
Fixed to floating rate swap on senior notes2.3
 
 
Senior notes2.5
 
 2.3
Unsecured revolving credit facility2.3
 1.9
 1.4
2.4
 3.2
 2.3
Unsecured term loans, unhedged portion2.3
 1.7
 1.4
Unsecured term loans2.9
 3.3
 2.3
Commercial paper notes2.0
 
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility3.1
 
 

 4.1
 3.1
Mortgage loans and other(1)
2.9
 2.1
 2.0
3.4
 3.4
 2.9
Total3.6
 3.6
 3.5
3.5
 3.7
 3.6
(1) 
Excludes mortgage debt of $57.4 million and $22.9 million related to real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively. All amounts werewhich was included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheet.

The variable rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $549.9$147.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 20182022 to January 2023May 2022, in each case that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. In addition, the fixed rate debt in the table above reflects, in part, the effect of $250.9$505.1 million and C$119.8 million notional amount of interest rate

swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018August 2020 to September 2027,December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the swap.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.     

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400.0 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%


The increase in our outstanding variable rate debt at December 31, 20172019 compared to December 31, 20162018 is primarily attributable to the $400.0 million notional amount interest rate swap mentioned above and increased borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, partially offset by term loan repayments.

Pursuantassumption of mortgage debt related to the termsLGM Acquisition and our November 2019 issuance of certain leases with one of our tenants, if interest rates increase on certain variablefloating rate debt that we have totaling $80.0 million as of December 31, 2017, our tenant is required to pay us additional rent (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) in an amount equal to the increase in interest expense resulting from the increased interest rates. Therefore, the increase in interest expense related to this debt is equally offset by an increase in additional rent due to us from the tenant. senior notes.

Assuming a 100 basis point increase in the weighted average interest rate related to our variable rate debt and assuming no change in our variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017,2019, interest expense for 2018on an annualized basis would increase by approximately $18.2$19.2 million, or $0.05 per diluted common share.


As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, our joint venture partners’ aggregate share of total debt was $76.7$228.2 million and $80.9$100.9 million, respectively, with respect to certain properties we owned through consolidated joint ventures. Total debt does not include our portion of debt related to investments in unconsolidated entities, which was $90.3$60.6 million and $122.0$40.8 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.


The fair value of our fixed and variable rate debt is based on current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For fixed rate debt, interest rate fluctuations generally affect the fair value, but not our earnings or cash flows. Therefore, interest rate risk does not have a significant impact on our fixed rate debt obligations until their maturity or earlier prepayment and refinancing. If interest rates have risen at the time we seek to refinance our fixed rate debt, whether at maturity or otherwise, our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional borrowing costs. Conversely, lower interest rates at the time of refinancing may reduce our overall borrowing costs.


To highlight the sensitivity of our fixed rate debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects of a hypothetical instantaneous change of 100 basis points in interest rates asrates:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Gross book value10,270,402
 $9,043,734
Fair value10,784,441
 8,926,280
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates:   
-100 basis points11,438,507
 9,574,799
+100 basis points10,196,943
 8,568,149

The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 20172018 to December 31, 2019 was due primarily to 2019 senior note issuances, net of repayments, and 2016:
the assumption of mortgage debt related to the LGM Acquisition.
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Gross book value$9,428,886
 $9,481,101
Fair value(1)
9,640,893
 9,600,621
Fair value reflecting change in interest rates(1):
   
-100 basis points10,148,313
 10,117,238
+100 basis points9,184,409
 9,133,292

(1)
The change in fair value of our fixed rate debt from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017 was due primarily to changes in the fair market value interest rates and 2017 senior note issuances, partially offset by repayments of senior notes and fixed rate mortgage debt.


As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the fair value of our secured and non-mortgage loans receivable, based on our estimates of currently prevailing rates for comparable loans, was $1.3 billion$710.5 million and $709.6$479.4 million, respectively. See “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” and “NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


As a result of our Canadian and United Kingdom operations, we are subject to fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates that may, from time to time, affect our financial condition and operating performance. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 20172019 (including the impact of existing hedging arrangements), if the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and Canadian dollar were to increase or decrease by one standard deviation compared to the average exchange rate during the year, our normalized FFO per share for the year ended December 31, 20172019 would decrease or increase, as applicable, by less than $0.01 per share or 0.1%. We will continue to mitigate these risks through a layered approach to hedging looking out for the next year and continual assessment of our foreign operational capital structure. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that any such fluctuations will not have an effect on our earnings.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, the amount of foreign currency translation loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets decreased by $20.6 million, primarily as a result of the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.


Concentration and Credit Risk


We use concentration ratios to identify, understand and evaluate the potential impact of economic downturns and other adverse events that may affect our asset types, geographic locations, business models, and tenants, operators and managers. We evaluate concentration risk in terms of investment mix and operations mix. Investment mix measures the percentage of our investments that is concentrated in a specific asset type or that is operated or managed by a particular tenant, operator or manager. Operations mix measures the percentage of our operating results that is attributed to a particular tenant, operator or manager, geographic location or business model. The following tables reflect our concentration risk as of the dates and for the periods presented:
As of
December 31,
As of
December 31,
2017 20162019 2018
Investment mix by asset type(1):
      
Seniors housing communities60.2% 61.8%62.2% 61.6%
MOBs19.7
 20.7
19.3
 20.4
Life science and innovation centers7.4
 6.1
Research and innovation centers8.7
 8.1
Health systems5.4
 5.6
5.1
 5.6
IRFs and LTACs1.7
 1.7
1.6
 1.7
SNFs0.7
 1.4
0.7
 0.8
Secured loans receivable and investments, net4.9
 2.7
2.4
 1.8
Investment mix by tenant, operator and manager(1):
      
Atria22.3% 22.6%20.4% 22.1%
Sunrise10.8
 11.3
10.3
 11.0
Brookdale Senior Living7.5
 8.1
7.7
 8.4
Ardent4.9
 5.1
4.7
 5.2
Kindred1.1
 1.8
1.0
 1.1
All other53.4
 51.1
55.9
 52.2


(1) 
Ratios are based on the gross book value of consolidated real estate investments (excluding properties classified as held for sale) as of each reporting date.

For the Year Ended
December 31,
For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
Operations mix by tenant and operator and business model:          
Revenues(1):
          
Senior living operations51.6% 53.6% 55.1%55.8% 55.3% 51.6%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7
 4.8
 5.3
4.7
 4.3
 4.7
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 1.3
3.1
 3.1
 3.1
Kindred4.7
 5.4
 5.7
3.3
 3.5
 4.7
All others35.7
 33.1
 32.6
33.1
 33.8
 35.9
Adjusted EBITDA(3):
     
Adjusted EBITDA:     
Senior living operations28.7% 30.9% 29.7%32.5% 31.3% 28.7%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
7.6
 7.9
 8.2
8.1
 6.7
 7.6
Ardent5.1
 5.1
 2.0
5.4
 5.1
 5.1
Kindred7.7
 8.9
 8.8
5.8
 5.6
 7.7
All others50.9
 47.2
 51.3
48.2
 51.3
 50.9
NOI(4):
     
NOI:     
Senior living operations28.5% 30.2% 32.1%31.1% 30.7% 28.5%
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0
 8.3
 9.3
8.7
 7.6
 8.0
Ardent5.3
 5.3
 2.3
5.8
 5.7
 5.3
Kindred8.1
 9.2
 9.9
6.3
 6.4
 8.1
All others49.9
 47.0
 46.4
48.1
 49.6
 50.1
Operations mix by geographic location(5):
     
Operations mix by geographic location(3):
     
California15.3% 15.3% 15.4%15.9% 15.7% 15.3%
New York8.6
 8.8
 8.8
8.8
 8.4
 8.6
Texas5.8
 6.3
 6.1
6.0
 6.2
 5.8
Illinois4.8
 4.9
 4.9
Pennsylvania4.7
 4.6
 4.2
Florida4.4
 4.5
 4.6
4.0
 4.4
 4.4
All others61.1
 60.2
 60.2
60.6
 60.7
 61.7


(1) 
Total revenues include medical office building and other services revenue, revenue from loans and investments and interest and other income (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale).
(2) 
ExcludesResults exclude two seniors housing communities in 2019 and 2018 and one seniors housing community in 2017 included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. 2018 results include the impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3) 
Includes amounts in discontinued operations.
(4)
Excludes amounts in discontinued operations.
(5)
Ratios are based on total revenues (excluding amounts in discontinued operations and including amounts related to assets classified as held for sale) for each period presented.


See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional disclosure and reconciliations of net income from continuing operations,attributable to common stockholders, as computed in accordance with GAAP, to Adjusted EBITDA and NOI, respectively.


We derive a significant portion of our revenues by leasing assets under long-term triple-net leases in which the rental rate is generally fixed with annual escalators, subject to certain limitations. Some of our triple-net lease escalators are contingent upon the satisfaction of specified facility revenue parameters or based on increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), with caps, floors or collars. We also earn revenues directly from individual residents in our seniors housing communities that are managed by independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, and tenants in our office buildings. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 52.9%2019, 60.3% of our Adjusted EBITDA (including amounts in discontinued operations) was derived from our senior living operations and office operations, for which rental rates may fluctuate more frequently upon lease rollovers and renewals due to shorter term leases and changing economic or market conditions.



The concentration of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and operating income that are attributed to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred creates credit risk. If any of Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—Our leases and other agreements with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred to satisfy its obligations under our agreements could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


We regularly monitor and assess any changes in the relative credit risk of our significant tenants, and in particular those tenants that have recourse obligations under our triple-net leases. The ratios and metrics we use to evaluate a significant tenant’s liquidity and creditworthiness depend on facts and circumstances specific to that tenant and the industry or industries in which it operates, including without limitation the tenant’s credit history and economic conditions related to the tenant, its operations and the markets in which the tenant operates, that may vary over time. Among other things, we may (i) review and analyze information regarding the real estate, seniors housing and healthcare industries generally, publicly available information regarding the significant tenant, and information required to be provided by the tenant under the terms of its lease agreements with us, (ii) examine monthly and/or quarterly financial statements of the significant tenant to the extent publicly available or otherwise provided under the terms of our lease agreements, and (iii) participate in periodic discussions and in-person meetings with representatives of the significant tenant.  Using this information, we calculate multiple financial ratios (which may, but do not necessarily, include net debt to EBITDAR or EBITDARM,leverage, fixed charge coverage and tangible net worth), after making certain adjustments based on our judgment, and assess other metrics we deem relevant to an understanding of the significant tenant’s credit risk.


Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants. However, we rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on Atria and Sunrise to set appropriate resident fees, to provide accurate property-level financials results for our properties in a timely manner and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—The properties managed by Atria and Sunrise account for a significant portion of our revenues and operating income; adverse developments in Atria’s orand Sunrise’s business and affairs or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” and “—We have rights to terminate our management agreements with Atria and Sunrise in whole or with respect to specific properties under certain circumstances, and we may be unable to replace Atria or Sunrise if our management agreements are terminated or not renewed” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Our 34% ownership interestinterests in Atria entitles us to certaincustomary rights and minority protections, as well asincluding the right to appoint two of six members onto the Atria Board of Directors.


Triple-Net Lease Performance and Expirations


IfAny failure, inability or unwillingness by our tenants to satisfy their obligations under our triple-net leases could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. Also, if our tenants are not able or willing to renew our triple-net leases upon expiration, we may be unable to reposition the applicable properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all. Although our lease expirations are staggered, the non-renewal of some or all of our triple-net leases that expire in any given year could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we had no triple-net lease renewals or expirations without renewal that, in the aggregate, had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations for that period. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Business—If we must replace any of our tenants or operators, we might be unable to reposition the properties on as favorable terms, or at all, and we could be subject to delays, limitations and expenses, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us” included in Part I, Item IA of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



The following table summarizes our triple-net lease expirations currently scheduled to occur over the next ten10 years (excluding leases related to assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017)2019):
Number of
Properties
 2017 Annual Rental Income % of 2017 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
Number of
Properties
 2019 Annual Rental Income % of 2019 Total Triple-Net Leased Properties Segment Rental Income
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)
2018
 $
 %
201970
 120,625
 14.4
202042
 36,129
 4.3
1
 $4,425
 0.6%
202153
 52,509
 6.3
8
 6,543
 0.8
202226
 18,536
 2.2
9
 10,777
 1.4
202310
 30,542
 3.6
6
 30,506
 3.9
202436
 22,487
 2.7
29
 16,747
 2.1
202559
 128,433
 15.3
180
 315,596
 40.4
202647
 42,632
 5.1
36
 56,515
 7.2
20277
 8,625
 1.0
3
 6,857
 0.9
202866
 114,344
 14.6
202921
 25,284
 3.2


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, we had a total of $81.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, operating cash and cash related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments that is deposited and held in property-level accounts. Funds maintained in the property-level accounts are used primarily for the payment of property-level expenses, debt service payments and certain capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2017, we also had escrow deposits and restricted cash of $106.9 million, $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under our unsecured revolving credit facility and $397.1 million of unused borrowing capacity available under our secured revolving credit facility.


During 2017,2019, our principal sources of liquidity were cash flows from operations, proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, borrowings under our commercial paper program, proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand.


For the next 12 months, our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund operating expenses; (ii) meet our debt service requirements; (iii) repay maturing mortgage and other debt, including $700.0 million of senior notes;debt; (iv) fund capital expenditures; (v) fund acquisitions, investments and commitments includingand any development and redevelopment activities; (v) fund capital expenditures; and (vi) make distributions to our stockholders and unitholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we may elect to prepay outstanding indebtedness prior to maturity based on our analysis of various factors. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.facilities and commercial paper program. However, an inability to access liquidity through multiple capital sources concurrently could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. See “Risk Factors—Risks Arising from Our Capital Structure—Limitations on our ability to access capital could have an adverse effect on our ability to make required payments on our debt obligations, make distributions to our stockholders or make future investments necessary to implement our business strategy” included in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our significant financing activities.

Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans


In April 2017, we entered into anOur unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprisedas of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature inDecember 31, 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.


In January 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), established an unsecured commercial paper program. Under the terms of the program, we may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2019, $567.5 million was outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.82019, $120.8 million of borrowingswas outstanding $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under ourthe unsecured revolving credit facility.    facility with an additional $24.0 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured

revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity and to support our commercial paper program. Including these internal limits, we had $2.3 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we also had a $900.0$200.0 million unsecured term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.        


In September 2017,As of December 31, 2019, we entered intohad a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility whichwith $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and will beis primarily used to finance life sciencethe development of research and innovation centercenters and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million borrowings outstanding under the secured revolving construction credit facility.

The agreements governing our credit facilities require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.

Senior Notes


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $7.6a C$500 million unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.
Senior Notes

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding $7.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), and guaranteed($500.0 million of which was co-issued by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:

$700.0 million principal amount of 2.00% senior notes due 2018 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.00% senior notes due 2019 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 2.700% senior notes due 2020 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$700.0 million principal amount of 4.750% senior notes due 2021 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$600.0 million principal amount of 4.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$500.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2022 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.750% senior notes due 2024;

$600.0 million principal amount of 3.500% senior notes due 2025;

$500.0 million principal amount of 4.125% senior notes due 2026;

$450.0 million principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026;

$400.0 million principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027;

$258.8 million principal amount of 5.45% senior notes due 2043 (co-issued with Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation);

$300.0 million principal amount of 5.70% senior notes due 2043; and

$300.0 million principal amount of 4.375% senior notes due 2045.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $75.4, approximately $75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes ofissued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, outstanding as follows:

$52.4 million principal amountin connection with our acquisition of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder);NHP, and

$23.0 million principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 (subject to earlier repayment at the option of the holder).

In addition, as of December 31, 2017, we had $0.9 C$1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes ofissued by our wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. outstanding as follows:

$318.0 million (C$400.0 million) principal amount of 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019;

$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 3.300% senior notes, Series C due 2022;

$218.7 million (C$275.0 million) principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, series D due 2023; and

$198.8 million (C$250.0 million) principal amount of 4.125% senior notes, series B due 2024.

In May 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.     

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.


We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase our outstanding senior notes for cash or in exchange for equity securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, prospects for future access to capital and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.


The indentures governing our outstanding senior notes require us to comply with various financial and other restrictive covenants. See “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2017.2019.


Mortgage Loan ObligationsMortgages


At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, our consolidated aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding was $1.3$2.0 billion and $1.7$1.1 billion, of which our share was $1.2$1.8 billion and $1.6$1.0 billion, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amounts of $411.4 million, $337.8 million and $461.9 million, respectively.


Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’s senior notes.

See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” and “NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Derivatives and Hedging


In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amountthe normal course of our business, interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floatingfluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% throughmitigate the maturity dateimpact of the swap.these risks.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.

In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%


Dividends


In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain). In addition, we will be subject to income tax at the regular corporate rate to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. In 2017, our Board of Directors declared dividends on our common stock aggregating $3.115 per share, which exceeds 100% of our 2017 estimated taxable income after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards. We paid the first three quarterly installments of our 2017 dividend of $0.775 per share during 2017. In December 2017, we declared the fourth quarter cash dividend on our common stock of $0.79 per share, which was paid in January 2018. We intend to pay dividends greater than 100% of our taxable income, after the use of any net operating loss carryforwards, for 2018.2020.


We expect that our cash flows will exceed our REIT taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions in computing REIT taxable income and that we will be able to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement. However, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to meet this requirement or we may decide to retain cash or

distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation. If we do not have sufficient cash on hand or other liquid assets to enable us to satisfy the 90% distribution requirement, or if we desire to retain cash, we may borrow funds, issue additional equity securities, pay taxable stock dividends, if possible, distribute other property or securities or engage in a transaction intended to enable us to meet the REIT distribution requirements or any combination of the foregoing.


Capital Expenditures


The terms of our triple-net leases generally obligate our tenants to pay all capital expenditures necessary to maintain and improve our triple-net leased properties. However, from time to time, we may fund the capital expenditures for our triple-net leased properties through loans or advances to the tenant,tenants, which may increase the amount of rent payable with respect to the properties in certain cases. We may also fund capital expenditures for which we may become responsible upon expiration of our triple-net leases or in the event that our tenants are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations under those leases orleases. We also expect to fund capital expenditures related to our senior living operations and office operations reportable business segments.segments with the cash flows from the properties or through additional borrowings. We expect that these liquidity needs generally will be satisfied by a combination of the following: cash flows from operations, cash on hand, debt assumptions and financings (including secured financings), issuances of debt and equity securities, dispositions of assets (in whole or in part through joint venture arrangements with third parties) and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.


To the extent that unanticipated capital expenditure needs arise or significant borrowings are required, our liquidity may be affected adversely. Our ability to borrow additional funds may be restricted in certain circumstances by the terms of the instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness.


We are party to certain agreements that obligate us to develop seniors housing or healthcare properties funded through capital that we and, in certain circumstances, our joint venture partners provide. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had 1422 properties under development pursuant to these agreements, including four properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. In addition, from time to time, we engage in redevelopment projects with respect to our existing seniors housing communities to maximize the value, increase NOI, maintain a market-competitive position, achieve property stabilization or change the primary use of the property.


Equity Offerings and Related Events


From time to time, we may sell our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). In March 2015,August 2018, we replaced our previous shelf registration statement that was scheduled to expire in accordance with the SEC’s rules with a new universal shelf registration statement, rendering our previousexpired ATM program inaccessible. In connection with our new universal shelf registration statement, we established a new ATMan identical program, pursuant tounder which we may sell from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock.


ForIn June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we issued and sold 1.12.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate netgross proceeds of $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions.$66.75 per share. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.62019, $822.1 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM equity offering program.

Other

We received proceeds of $16.3 million and $20.4 million forFor the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, from the exercises of outstanding stock options. Future proceeds from the exercises of stock options will be affected primarily by the future trading price2018, we sold no shares of our common stock and the number of options outstanding. The number of options outstanding increased to 5.0 million as of December 31, 2017, from 3.8 million as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average exercise price was $58.57 as of December 31, 2017.

under our ATM program.

Cash Flows


The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
Increase (Decrease)
to Cash
 2017 2016 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period$286,707
 $53,023
 $233,684
 nm
Net cash provided by operating activities1,442,180
 1,372,341
 69,839
 5.1%
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) 258,126
 20.9
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 (768,165) nm
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents312
 (852) 1,164
 nm
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$81,355
 $286,707
 (205,352) (71.6)
 
For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
(Decrease) Increase
to Cash
 2019 2018 $ %
 (Dollars in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year$131,464
 $188,253
 $(56,789) (30.2)%
Net cash provided by operating activities1,437,783
 1,381,467
 56,316
 4.1
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (1,909,795) nm
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) 1,922,611
 nm
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 2,295
 nm
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 14,638
 11.1


nm—not meaningful


Cash Flows from Operating Activities


Cash flows from operating activities increased $69.8$56.3 million during the year ended December 31, 20172019 over the same period in 20162018 due primarily to investments made during 2016higher NOI in 2019 including the impact of property acquisitions and 2017,lease-up of new developments, partially offset by asset dispositions, during the same periods.and lower merger-related expenses and deal costs in 2019.


Cash Flows from Investing Activities


Cash used inflows from investing activities decreased $258.1 million$1.9 billion during 20172019 over 20162018 primarily due to decreasedincreased acquisition and investment inactivity together with decreased real estate property during 2017 and proceeds from the 2017 sale of 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred, partially offset by the $700.0 million term loan we provided in March 2017 to facilitate Ardent’s acquisition of LHP, increases in development project expenditures and investments in unconsolidated entities and decreased loan receivable payments received during 2017.dispositions.


Cash Flows from Financing Activities


Cash provided byflows from financing activities decreased $768.2 millionincreased $1.9 billion during 20172019 over 20162018 primarily due to increased debt repayments and decreased proceeds from the 2019 issuance of common stock during 2017, partially offset byand increased senior note issuances andnet borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility during 2017 over 2016.in 2019.


Contractual Obligations


The following table summarizes the effect that minimum debt (which includes principal and interest payments) and other material noncancelable commitments are expected to have on our cash flow in future periods as of December 31, 2017:2019:
Total 
Less than 1
year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
Total 
Less than 1 year(3)
 
1 - 3 years(4)
 
3 - 5 years(5)
 
More than 5
years(6)
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Long-term debt obligations (1) (2)
$14,444,492
 $1,214,444
 $3,499,792
 $3,252,070
 $6,478,186
$15,591,539
 $1,296,990
 $2,607,408
 $3,799,947
 $7,887,194
Operating obligations, including ground lease obligations738,508
 27,498
 47,159
 40,389
 623,462
803,659
 28,826
 90,930
 38,902
 645,001
Total$15,183,000
 $1,241,942
 $3,546,951
 $3,292,459
 $7,101,648
$16,395,198
 $1,325,816
 $2,698,338
 $3,838,849
 $8,532,195


(1) 
Amounts represent contractual amounts due, including interest.
(2) 
Interest on variable rate debt was based on forward rates obtained as of December 31, 2017.2019.
(3) 
Includes $700.0$567.5 million of borrowings outstanding principal amount ofon our 2.00% senior notes due 2018.commercial paper program.
(4) 
Includes $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.00% senior notes due 2019, $318.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.00% senior notes, series A due 2019, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.700% senior notes due 2020, and $900.0 million of borrowings under our unsecured term loan due 2020.

(5)
Includes $535.8$120.8 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility, $2.9$160.5 million of borrowings outstanding on our secured revolving construction credit facility, $700.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.750% senior notes due 2021, $600.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022, $500.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.250%3.25% senior notes due 2022, and $198.8$231.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.300%floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.30% senior notes, Series C due 2022.
(5)
Includes $200.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.125% senior notes due 2023, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.10% senior notes due 2023, $211.8 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023, $400.0 million

outstanding principal amount of our 3.50% senior notes due 2024, $400.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 3.75% senior notes due 2024, $462.0 million outstanding principal amount of our 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024 and $192.5 million outstanding principal amount of our 4.125% senior notes, Series B due 2024.
(6) 
Includes $4.4$385.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured term loan due 2025 and $5.4 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding of our senior notes maturing between 20232025 and 2045.2049. $52.4 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and $23.0$22.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $16.8$12.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits that are excluded from the table above, as we are unable to make a reasonable reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authority.



ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Asset/Liability Management” is incorporated by reference into this Item 7A.



ITEM 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Ventas, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules




Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016
2018
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years endedYears Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
Schedule IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate




MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.


Management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2017.2019.
 
In September 2019, the Company acquired an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including five in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”). As permitted under Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines, the Company excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, internal control over financial reporting of the operations of these acquired assets. Total assets and total revenues related to these operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.












REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
Ventas, Inc.:


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended
December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 9, 201821, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses the probability of collecting substantially all triple-net rents on an operator-by-operator basis. Whenever the results of that assessment, events, or changes in circumstances indicate that the Company will be unable to collect substantially all triple-net rents, the Company records a charge to rental income.

We identified the evaluation of the probability of collection for substantially all triple-net rents as a critical audit matter. The assessment is subjective and required complex auditor judgment to evaluate the various inputs and assumptions, including the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, and the expected operating performance of the leased property.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the relevant data inputs and assumptions in the collectibility assessment. To assess the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, we identified and evaluated the relevance, reliability, and sufficiency of the tenant and property financial information, tenant guarantees, the existence of outstanding accounts receivable, and the remaining term of the lease in the triple net collectibility assessment. We assessed the Company’s ability to estimate probability of collections by testing the reliability of the Company’s historical determinations.

Evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles

As discussed in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired approximately $2 billion of real estate during the year ended December 31, 2019. The purchase price was allocated to the real estate assets acquired, primarily buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles on a relative fair value basis.

We identified the evaluation of the purchase price allocation related to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles as a critical audit matter. The recorded value of investment in real estate, specifically buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, was sensitive to changes to the inputs and assumptions in the purchase price allocation. This resulted in a higher degree of subjectivity and required complex auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s purchase price allocation over buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles. We evaluated the Company’s inputs and assumptions that were used to determine relative fair value by 1) identifying and considering the relevancy, reliability, and sufficiency of the sources of data used by the Company in developing the assumptions, 2) comparing to relevant industry market data, and 3) where relevant, performing a retrospective analysis of the assumptions used in prior acquisitions. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in performing an assessment of the purchase price allocation to buildings and improvements, land, and seniors housing in-place lease related intangibles, including the comparison to relevant market data.

/s/ KPMG LLP



We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.2014.


Chicago, Illinois
February 9, 201821, 2020



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTINGReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directors
Directors Ventas, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Ventas, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the “Company”)Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated February 9, 201821, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company acquired an interest in certain real estate assets through an equity partnership with Le Groupe Maurice during 2019, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, the internal control over financial reporting of the operations of the acquired assets (LGM Operations). Total assets and total revenues related to LGM Operations represented 0.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the Company’s related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of LGM Operations.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that

controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois February 21, 2020
February 9, 2018













VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,As of December 31,
2017 20162019 2018
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
Assets      
Real estate investments:      
Land and improvements$2,147,621
 $2,089,591
$2,283,929
 $2,114,406
Buildings and improvements22,177,088
 21,516,396
24,380,440
 22,437,243
Construction in progress343,129
 210,599
461,354
 422,334
Acquired lease intangibles1,537,995
 1,510,629
1,306,152
 1,502,955
Operating lease assets385,225
 
26,205,833
 25,327,215
28,817,100
 26,476,938
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(5,617,453) (4,932,461)(7,088,013) (6,383,281)
Net real estate property20,588,380
 20,394,754
21,729,087
 20,093,657
Secured loans receivable and investments, net1,346,359
 702,021
704,612
 495,869
Investments in unconsolidated real estate entities123,639
 95,921
45,022
 48,378
Net real estate investments22,058,378
 21,192,696
22,478,721
 20,637,904
Cash and cash equivalents81,355
 286,707
106,363
 72,277
Escrow deposits and restricted cash106,898
 80,647
39,739
 59,187
Goodwill1,034,641
 1,033,225
1,051,161
 1,050,548
Assets held for sale100,324
 54,961
91,433
 5,454
Deferred income tax assets, net47,495
 
Other assets572,945
 518,364
877,296
 759,185
Total assets$23,954,541
 $23,166,600
$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
Liabilities and equity      
Liabilities:      
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,276,062
 $11,127,326
$12,158,773
 $10,733,699
Accrued interest93,958
 83,762
111,115
 99,667
Operating lease liabilities251,196
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities1,182,552
 907,928
1,145,700
 1,086,030
Liabilities related to assets held for sale61,202
 1,462
5,463
 205
Deferred income taxes250,092
 316,641
Deferred income tax liabilities200,831
 205,219
Total liabilities12,863,866
 12,437,119
13,873,078
 12,124,820
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests158,490
 200,728
273,678
 188,141
Commitments and contingencies
 

 

Equity:      
Ventas stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, unissued
 

 
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 356,187 and 354,125 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively89,029
 88,514
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 600,000 shares authorized, 372,811 and 356,572 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively93,185
 89,125
Capital in excess of par value13,053,057
 12,917,002
14,056,453
 13,076,528
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(35,120) (57,534)(34,564) (19,582)
Retained earnings (deficit)(2,240,698) (2,487,695)(3,669,050) (2,930,214)
Treasury stock, 1 share at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively(42) (47)
Treasury stock, 2 and 0 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively(132) 
Total Ventas stockholders’ equity10,866,226
 10,460,240
10,445,892
 10,215,857
Noncontrolling interests65,959
 68,513
99,560
 55,737
Total equity10,932,185
 10,528,753
10,545,452
 10,271,594
Total liabilities and equity$23,954,541
 $23,166,600
$24,692,208
 $22,584,555
  See accompanying notes.


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
Revenues          
Rental income:          
Triple-net leased$840,131
 $845,834
 $779,801
$780,898
 $737,796
 $840,131
Office753,467
 630,342
 566,245
828,978
 776,011
 753,467
1,593,598
 1,476,176
 1,346,046
1,609,876
 1,513,807
 1,593,598
Resident fees and services1,843,232
 1,847,306
 1,811,255
2,151,533
 2,069,477
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenue13,677
 21,070
 41,492
11,156
 13,416
 13,677
Income from loans and investments117,608
 98,094
 86,553
89,201
 124,218
 117,608
Interest and other income6,034
 876
 1,052
10,984
 24,892
 6,034
Total revenues3,574,149
 3,443,522
 3,286,398
3,872,750
 3,745,810
 3,574,149
Expenses          
Interest448,196
 419,740
 367,114
451,662
 442,497
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization887,948
 898,924
 894,057
1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Property-level operating expenses:          
Senior living1,250,065
 1,242,978
 1,209,415
1,521,398
 1,446,201
 1,250,065
Office233,007
 191,784
 174,225
260,249
 243,679
 233,007
Triple-net leased26,561
 
 
1,483,072
 1,434,762
 1,383,640
1,808,208
 1,689,880
 1,483,072
Office building services costs3,391
 7,311
 26,565
2,319
 1,418
 3,391
General, administrative and professional fees135,490
 126,875
 128,035
165,996
 151,982
 135,490
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
41,900
 58,254
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs10,535
 24,635
 102,944
15,235
 30,547
 10,535
Other20,052
 9,988
 17,957
(17,609) 66,768
 20,052
Total expenses2,989,438
 2,925,014
 2,934,723
3,513,331
 3,360,985
 2,989,438
Income before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests584,711
 518,508
 351,675
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(561) 4,358
 (1,420)
Income before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests359,419
 384,825
 584,711
Loss from unconsolidated entities(2,454) (55,034) (561)
Gain on real estate dispositions26,022
 46,247
 717,273
Income tax benefit59,799
 31,343
 39,284
56,310
 39,953
 59,799
Income from continuing operations643,949
 554,209
 389,539
439,297
 415,991
 1,361,222
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103

 (10) (110)
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
439,297
 415,981
 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
$433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Earnings per common share          
Basic:          
Income from continuing operations$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
$1.20
 $1.17
 $3.83
Net income attributable to common stockholders3.82
 1.88
 1.26
1.18
 1.15
 3.82
Diluted:          
Income from continuing operations$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
$1.19
 $1.16
 $3.80
Net income attributable to common stockholders3.78
 1.86
 1.25
1.17
 1.14
 3.78
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common share:     
Basic355,326
 344,703
 330,311
Diluted358,566
 348,390
 334,007
  See accompanying notes.


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net income$1,361,112
 $651,490
 $419,222
$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Other comprehensive (loss) income:     
Foreign currency translation20,612
 (52,266) (14,792)5,729
 (9,436) 20,612
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(437) (310) (5,236)
Other2,239
 2,607
 (658)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)22,414
 (49,969) (20,686)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities11,634
 14,944
 (437)
Derivative instruments(30,814) 10,030
 2,239
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(13,451) 15,538
 22,414
Comprehensive income1,383,526
 601,521
 398,536
425,846
 431,519
 1,383,526
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
7,649

6,514

4,642
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$1,378,884
 $599,262
 $397,157
$418,197
 $425,005
 $1,378,884
See accompanying notes.


VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 Total Equity
Common
Stock Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total Ventas
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non- controlling
Interests
 Total Equity
(In thousands, except per share amounts)(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at January 1, 2015$74,656
 $10,119,306
 $13,121
 $(1,526,388) $(511) $8,680,184
 $74,213
 $8,754,397
Net income
 
 
 417,843
 
 417,843
 1,379
 419,222
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (20,686) 
 
 (20,686) 
 (20,686)
Acquisition-related activity7,103
 2,209,202
 
 
 
 2,216,305
 853
 2,217,158
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 (1,247,356) 
 
 
 (1,247,356) (4,717) (1,252,073)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 (12,530) (12,530)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.04 per share
 
 
 (1,003,413) 
 (1,003,413) 
 (1,003,413)
Issuance of common stock1,797
 489,227
 
 
 
 491,024
 
 491,024
Issuance of common stock for stock plans23
 6,068
 
 
 5,945
 12,036
 
 12,036
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (374) 
 
 
 (374) 1,902
 1,528
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 7,831
 
 
 
 7,831
 
 7,831
Redemption of OP units
 1,719
 
 
 
 1,719
 
 1,719
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
 17,215
 
 
 (8,001) 9,214
 
 9,214
Balance at December 31, 201583,579
 11,602,838
 (7,565) (2,111,958) (2,567) 9,564,327
 61,100
 9,625,427
Net income
 
 
 649,231
 
 649,231
 2,259
 651,490
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (49,969) 
 
 (49,969) 
 (49,969)
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 640
 
 
 
 640
 
 640
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (2,179) 
 
 
 (2,179) 19,008
 16,829
Dividends to common stockholders—$2.965 per share
 
 
 (1,024,968) 
 (1,024,968) 
 (1,024,968)
Issuance of common stock4,716
 1,281,947
 
 
 17
 1,286,680
 
 1,286,680
Issuance of common stock for stock plans99
 26,594
 
 
 2,572
 29,265
 
 29,265
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (1,714) 
 
 
 (1,714) (13,854) (15,568)
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (21,085) 
 
 
 (21,085) 
 (21,085)
Redemption of OP units92
 22,622
 
 
 1,098
 23,812
 
 23,812
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures28
 7,339
 
 
 (1,167) 6,200
 
 6,200
Balance at December 31, 201688,514
 12,917,002
 (57,534) (2,487,695) (47) 10,460,240
 68,513
 10,528,753
Balance at January 1, 2017$88,514
 $12,917,002
 $(57,534) $(2,487,695) $(47) $10,460,240
 $68,513
 $10,528,753
Net income
 
 
 1,356,470
 
 1,356,470
 4,642
 1,361,112

 
 
 1,356,470
 
 1,356,470
 4,642
 1,361,112
Other comprehensive income
 
 22,414
 
 
 22,414
 
 22,414

 
 22,414
 
 
 22,414
 
 22,414
Impact of CCP Spin-Off
 107
 
 
 
 107
 
 107

 107
 
 
 
 107
 
 107
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (1,427) 
 
 
 (1,427) (13,292) (14,719)
 (1,427) 
 
 
 (1,427) (13,292) (14,719)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.115 per share
 
 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473)
 
 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473) 
 (1,109,473)
Issuance of common stock276
 72,618
 
 
 553
 73,447
 
 73,447
276
 72,618
 
 
 553
 73,447
 
 73,447
Issuance of common stock for stock plans87
 21,723
 
 
 796
 22,606
 
 22,606
87
 21,723
 
 
 796
 22,606
 
 22,606
Change in redeemable noncontrolling interests
 (850) 
 
 
 (850) 6,096
 5,246

 (850) 
 
 
 (850) 6,096
 5,246
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 253
 
 
 
 253
 
 253

 253
 
 
 
 253
 
 253
Redemption of OP units84
 19,845
 
 
 3,207
 23,136
 
 23,136
Redemption of OP and Class C Units84
 19,845
 
 
 3,207
 23,136
 
 23,136
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures68
 23,786
 
 
 (4,551) 19,303
 
 19,303
68
 23,786
 
 
 (4,551) 19,303
 
 19,303
Balance at December 31, 2017$89,029
 $13,053,057
 $(35,120) $(2,240,698) $(42) $10,866,226
 $65,959
 $10,932,185
89,029
 13,053,057
 (35,120) (2,240,698) (42) 10,866,226
 65,959
 10,932,185
Net income
 
 
 409,467
 
 409,467
 6,514
 415,981
Other comprehensive income
 
 15,538
 
 
 15,538
 
 15,538
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (7,470) 
 
 
 (7,470) (16,736) (24,206)
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.1625 per share
 
 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626) 
 (1,129,626)
Issuance of common stock for stock plans and other49
 11,542
 
 
 1,318
 12,909
 
 12,909
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (3,323) 
 
 
 (3,323) 
 (3,323)
Redemption of OP Units3
 (383) 
 
 252
 (128) 
 (128)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures44
 23,105
 
 
 (1,528) 21,621
 
 21,621
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
 
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
 
 30,643
Balance at December 31, 201889,125
 13,076,528
 (19,582) (2,930,214) 
 10,215,857
 55,737
 10,271,594
Net income
 
 
 433,016
 
 433,016
 6,281
 439,297
Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
 (14,819) 
 
 (14,819) 1,368
 (13,451)
Net change in noncontrolling interests
 (12,332) 
 
 
 (12,332) 36,174
 23,842
Dividends to common stockholders—$3.17 per share
 
 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653) 
 (1,172,653)
Issuance of common stock3,829
 938,509
 
 
 
 942,338
 
 942,338
Issuance of common stock for stock plans152

64,581





6,587
 71,320
 
 71,320
Adjust redeemable OP unitholder interests to current fair value
 (7,388) 
 
 
 (7,388) 
 (7,388)
Redemption of OP Units1
 (739) 
 
 
 (738) 
 (738)
Grant of restricted stock, net of forfeitures78
 (2,706) 
 
 (6,719) (9,347) 
 (9,347)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
 
 (163) 801
 
 638
 
 638
Balance at December 31, 2019$93,185
 $14,056,453
 $(34,564) $(3,669,050) $(132) $10,445,892
 $99,560
 $10,545,452
   See accompanying notes.

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income$1,361,112
 $651,490
 $419,222
$439,297
 $415,981
 $1,361,112
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization (including amounts in discontinued operations)887,948
 898,924
 973,663
Depreciation and amortization1,045,620
 919,639
 887,948
Amortization of deferred revenue and lease intangibles, net(20,537) (20,336) (24,129)(7,967) (30,660) (20,537)
Other non-cash amortization16,058
 10,357
 5,448
22,985
 18,886
 16,058
Stock-based compensation26,543
 20,958
 19,537
33,923
 29,963
 26,543
Straight-lining of rental income, net(23,134) (27,988) (33,792)
Straight-lining of rental income(30,073) 13,396
 (23,134)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net754
 2,779
 14,411
41,900
 58,254
 754
Gain on real estate dispositions(717,273) (98,203) (18,811)(26,022) (46,247) (717,273)
Gain on real estate loan investments(124) (2,271) 

 (13,202) (124)
Gain on sale of marketable securities
 
 (5,800)
Income tax benefit(63,599) (34,227) (42,384)(58,918) (43,026) (63,599)
Loss (income) from unconsolidated entities3,588
 (4,358) 1,244
(Gain) loss on re-measurement of equity interests upon acquisition, net(3,027) 
 176
Loss from unconsolidated entities2,464
 55,034
 3,588
Gain on re-measurement of equity interest upon acquisition, net
 
 (3,027)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities4,676
 7,598
 23,462
1,600
 2,934
 4,676
Real estate impairments related to natural disasters
 52,510
 4,616
Other9,240
 (1,847) 6,517
13,264
 3,720
 4,624
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
(Increase) decrease in other assets(15,854) 5,560
 42,316
Increase in other assets(76,693) (23,198) (29,282)
Increase in accrued interest11,068
 2,604
 19,995
9,737
 4,992
 11,068
Decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities(35,259) (38,699) (2,244)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities26,666
 (37,509) (35,259)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,442,180
 1,372,341
 1,398,831
1,437,783
 1,381,467
 1,428,752
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Net investment in real estate property(380,232) (1,429,112) (2,650,788)(958,125) (265,907) (664,684)
Investment in loans receivable and other(748,119) (158,635) (171,144)
Investment in loans receivable(1,258,187) (229,534) (748,119)
Proceeds from real estate disposals537,431
 300,561
 492,408
147,855
 353,792
 859,874
Proceeds from loans receivable101,097
 320,082
 109,176
1,017,309
 911,540
 101,097
Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities
 
 76,800
Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures
 
 4,003
Development project expenditures(299,085) (143,647) (119,674)(403,923) (330,876) (299,085)
Capital expenditures(132,558) (117,456) (107,487)(156,724) (131,858) (132,558)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities6,169
 
 
172
 57,455
 6,169
Investment in unconsolidated entities(61,220) (6,436) (56,986)(3,855) (47,007) (61,220)
Net cash used in investing activities(976,517) (1,234,643) (2,423,692)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims30,179
 6,891
 1,419
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(1,585,299) 324,496
 (937,107)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities384,783
 (35,637) (723,457)(569,891) 321,463
 384,783
Net cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
 
 (128,749)
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program565,524
 
 
Proceeds from debt1,111,649
 893,218
 2,512,747
3,013,191
 2,549,473
 1,111,649
Proceeds from debt related to CCP Spin-Off
 
 1,400,000
Repayment of debt(1,369,084) (1,022,113) (1,435,596)(2,623,916) (3,465,579) (1,369,084)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(15,809) (2,846) (3,819)
 (4,724) (15,809)
Payment of deferred financing costs(27,297) (6,555) (24,665)(21,403) (20,612) (27,297)
Issuance of common stock, net73,596
 1,286,680
 491,023
942,085
 
 73,596
Cash distribution to common stockholders(827,285) (1,024,968) (1,003,413)(1,157,720) (1,127,143) (827,285)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders(5,677) (8,640) (15,095)(9,218) (7,459) (5,677)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
 
 (33,188)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units(2,203) (1,370) 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests4,402
 7,326
 
6,282
 1,883
 4,402
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(11,187) (6,879) (12,649)(9,717) (11,574) (11,187)
Proceeds from stock option exercises36,179
 8,762
 16,287
Other10,582
 17,252
 (81)(8,519) (5,057) (5,705)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(671,327) 96,838
 1,023,058
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(205,664) 234,536
 (1,803)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents312
 (852) (522)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period286,707
 53,023
 55,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$81,355
 $286,707
 $53,023
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities160,674
 (1,761,937) (671,327)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash13,158
 (55,974) (179,682)
Effect of foreign currency translation1,480
 (815) 581
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year131,464
 188,253
 367,354
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$146,102
 $131,464
 $188,253

VENTAS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          
Interest paid including swap payments and receipts$409,890
 $395,138
 $391,699
$410,584
 $406,907
 $409,890
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:          
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions:     
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions and other:     
Real estate investments$425,906
 $69,092
 $2,565,960
$1,057,138
 $94,280
 $425,906
Utilization of funds held for an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange(286,748) (6,954) (8,911)
Other assets(3,716) 90,037
 20,090
11,140
 5,398
 (3,716)
Debt75,231
 47,641
 177,857
907,746
 30,508
 75,231
Other liabilities70,878
 72,636
 54,459
47,121
 18,086
 70,878
Deferred income tax liability(14,869) 9,381
 52,153
95
 922
 (14,869)
Noncontrolling interests4,202
 22,517
 88,085
113,316
 2,591
 4,202
Equity issued
 
 2,204,585

 30,487
 
Non-cash impact of CCP Spin-Off
 
 1,256,404
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units and Class C Units24,002
 24,318
 
Equity issued for redemption of OP Units127
 907
 24,002
See accompanying notes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






NOTE 1—DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Ventas, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) with a highly diversified portfolio of seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we owned more thanapproximately 1,200 properties (including properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities and properties classified as held for sale), consisting of seniors housing communities, medical office buildings (“MOBs”), life scienceresearch and innovation centers, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (“IRFs”) and long-term acute care facilities (“LTACs”), and health systems and skilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”), and wesystems. We had 1422 properties under development, including four4 properties that are owned by unconsolidated real estate entities. Our company was originally founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.


We primarily invest in seniors housing, research and innovation, and healthcare properties through acquisitions and lease our properties to unaffiliated tenants or operate them through independent third-party managers.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we leased a total of 546412 properties (excluding MOBs)properties within our office operations reportable business segment) to various healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures. Our 3 largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, LLC (formerly Kindred Healthcare, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 122 properties (excluding 2 properties managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to long-term management agreements), 11 properties and 32 properties, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, pursuant to long-term management agreements, we engaged independent operators, such as Atria Senior Living, Inc. (“Atria”) and Sunrise Senior Living, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Sunrise”), to manage 297406 seniors housing communities for us.

Our three largest tenants, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Brookdale Senior Living”), Ardent Health Partners, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Ardent”) and Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Kindred”) leased from us 135 properties (excluding one property managed by Brookdale Senior Living pursuant to a long-term management agreement), 10 properties and 31 properties (excluding one MOB included within our office operations reportable business segment), respectively, as of December 31, 2017.


Through our Lillibridge Healthcare Services, Inc. subsidiary and our ownership interest in PMB Real Estate Services LLC, we also provide MOB management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services to highly rated hospitals and health systems throughout the United States. In addition, from time to time, we make secured and non-mortgage loans and other investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties.

In August 2015, we completed the spin-off of most of our post-acute/skilled nursing facility portfolio into an independent, publicly traded REIT named Care Capital Properties, Inc. (“CCP”) (the “CCP Spin-Off”). The historical results of operations of the CCP properties are presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. See “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS.”

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford Science & Technology, LLC (“Wexford”) from affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Partners VIII, L.P. (together with its affiliates, “Blackstone”) (the “Life Sciences Acquisition”). As a result, we renamed our MOB operations reportable business segment “office operations,” which now includes both MOBs and life science and innovation centers.


NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiaries and the joint venture entities over which we exercise control. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation, and our net earnings are reduced by the portion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; and (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We consolidate our investment in a VIE when we determine that we are its primary beneficiary. We may change our original assessment of a VIE upon subsequent events such as the modification of contractual arrangements that affects the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposition of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We identify the primary beneficiary of a VIE as the enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could be significant to the entity. We perform this analysis on an ongoing basis.

As it relates to investments in joint ventures, GAAP may preclude consolidation by the sole general partner in certain circumstances based on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s).partner or partners. We assess limited partners’ rights and their impact on our consolidation conclusions, and we reassess if there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership (“LP”) interests or there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnershipLP interests. We also apply this guidance to managing member interests in limited liability companies.companies (“LLCs”).

We consolidate several VIEs that share the following common characteristics:


the VIE is in the legal form of an LP or LLC;
the VIE was designed to own and manage its underlying real estate investments;
we are the general partner or managing member of the VIE;
we own a majority of the voting interests in the VIE;
a minority of voting interests in the VIE are owned by external third parties, unrelated to us;
the minority owners do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights in the VIE; and
we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

We have separately identified certain special purpose entities that were established to allow investments in life scienceresearch and innovation projects by tax credit investors (“TCIs”). We have determined that these special purpose entities are VIEs, we are a holder of variable interests and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs, and therefore we consolidate these special purpose entities. Our primary beneficiary determination is based upon several factors, including but not limited to the rights we have in directing the activities which most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance as well as certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur.

In general, the assets of the consolidated VIEs are available only for the settlement of the obligations of the respective entities. Unless otherwise required by the LP or LLC agreement, any mortgage loans of the consolidated VIEs are non-recourse to us. The table below summarizes the total assets and liabilities of our consolidated VIEs as reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets:
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Assets Total Liabilities
  (In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P. $666,404
 $244,934
 $673,467
 $238,147
Other identified VIEs 4,075,821
 1,459,830
 2,076,715
 405,350
Tax credit VIEs 845,229
 333,809
 797,077
 297,004

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Assets Total Liabilities
  (In thousands)
NHP/PMB L.P. $605,150
 $199,958
 $639,763
 $199,674
Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. 
 
 2,143,139
 162,426
Other identified VIEs 1,983,124
 349,961
 1,882,336
 354,034
Tax credit VIEs 988,598
 221,908
 981,752
 234,109

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We base the initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities on the fair value of the assets at the time we acquired the joint venture interest. We estimate fair values for our equity method investments based on discounted cash flow
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. The capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads we use in these models are based upon assumptions that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

We generally amortize any difference between our cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level, if any, over the lives of the related assets and liabilities and include that amortization in our share of income or loss from unconsolidated entities. For earnings of equity method investments with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other instances,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


net income or loss is allocated between the partners in the joint venture based on the hypothetical liquidation at book value method (the “HLBV method”). Under the HLBV method, net income or loss is allocated between the partners based on the difference between each partner’s claim on the net assets of the joint venture at the end and beginning of the period, after taking into account contributions and distributions. Each partner’s share of the net assets of the joint venture is calculated as the amount that the partner would receive if the joint venture were to liquidate all of its assets at net book value and distribute the resulting cash to creditors and partners in accordance with their respective priorities. Under thisthe HLBV method, in any given period, we could record more or less income than the joint venture has generated, than actual cash distributions receivedwe receive or than the amount we may receive in the event of an actual liquidation.

Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests

We own a majority interest in NHP/PMB L.P. (“NHP/PMB”), a limited partnership formed in 2008 to acquire properties from entities affiliated with Pacific Medical Buildings LLC. We consolidate NHP/PMB, asLLC (“PMB”). Given our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and the primary beneficiary of thisNHP/PMB, we consolidate it as a VIE. As of December 31, 2017,2019, third party investors owned 2.73.3 million Class A limited partnership units in NHP/PMB (“OP Units”), which represented 27.2%31% of the total units then outstanding, and we owned 7.27.3 million Class B limited partnership units in NHP/PMB, representing the remaining 72.8%69%. At any time following the first anniversary of the date of their issuance, the OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, 0.9051 shares of our common stock per OP Unit, subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. We are party by assumption to a registration rights agreement with the holders of the OP Units that requires us, subject to the terms and conditions and certain exceptions set forth therein, to file and maintain a registration statement relating to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of OP Units.

Prior to January 2017, we owned a majority interest in Ventas Realty Capital Healthcare Trust Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Ventas Realty OP”) and we consolidated this entity asbecause our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner and was the primary beneficiary of this VIE. In January 2017, third party investors redeemed the remaining 341,776 limited partnership units (“Class C Units”) outstanding for 341,776 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $20.9 million.outstanding. After giving effect to such redemptions, Ventas Realty OP is our wholly owned subsidiary.

As redemption rights are outside of our control, the redeemable OP Units and Class C Units (together, the “OP Unitholder Interests”) are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We reflect the redeemable OP Unitholder InterestsUnits at the greater of cost or fairredemption value. As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the fair value of the redeemable OP Unitholder InterestsUnits was $146.3$171.2 million and $177.2$174.6 million, respectively. We recognize changes in fair value through capital in excess of par value, net of cash distributions paid and purchases by us of any OP Unitholder Interests.Units. Our diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) includes the effect of any potential shares outstanding from redemption of the OP Unitholder Interests.Units.

Certain noncontrolling interests of other consolidated joint ventures were also classified as redeemable at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. Accordingly, we record the carrying amount of these noncontrolling interests at the greater of their initial carrying amount (increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions) or the redemption value. Our joint venture partners have certain redemption rights with respect to their noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures that are outside of our control, and the redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the carrying value of redeemable noncontrolling interests through capital in excess of par value.
Noncontrolling Interests

Excluding the redeemable noncontrolling interests described above, we present the portion of any equity that we do not own in entities that we control (and thus consolidate) as noncontrolling interests and classify those interests as a component of consolidated equity, separate from total Ventas stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For consolidated joint ventures with pro rata distribution allocations, net income or loss, and comprehensive income, is allocated between the joint venture partners based on their respective stated ownership percentages. In other cases, net income or loss is allocated between the joint venture partners based on the HLBV method. We account for purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change of control as equity transactions, through capital in excess of par value. In addition, weWe include net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in net income in our Consolidated Statements of Income and we include the noncontrolling interests share of comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Accounting for Historic and New Markets Tax Credits

For certain of our life scienceresearch and innovation centers, we are party to certain contractual arrangements with TCIs that were established to enable the TCIs to receive benefits of historic tax credits (“HTCs”) and/or new marketmarkets tax credits (“NMTCs”). As of December 31, 2017,2019, we own 11owned 10 properties, including 1 property in development, that had syndicated HTCs or NMTCs, or both, to TCIs.

In general, capital contributions are made by TCIs invest cash into special purpose entities that invest in entities that own the subject property and generate the tax credits. The TCIs receive substantially all of the tax credits and hold only a noncontrollingnominal interest in the economic risk and benefits of the special purpose entities.

HTCs are delivered to the TCIs upon substantial completion of the project. NMTCs are allowed for up to 39% of a qualified investment and are delivered to the TCIs after the investment has been funded and spent on a qualified business. HTCs are subject to 20% recapture per year beginning one year after the completion of the historic rehabilitation of the subject property. NMTCs are subject to 100% recapture until the end of the seventh year following the qualifying investment. We have provided the TCIs with certain guarantees which protect the TCIs from losses should a tax credit recapture event occur. The contractual arrangements with the TCIs include a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the ownership interest of the TCIs in the special purpose entities at the end of the tax credit recapture period. We anticipate that either the TCIs will exercise their put rights or we will exercise our call rights prior to the applicable tax credit recapture periods.

The portion of the TCI’s capital contributioninvestment that is attributed to the put is recorded at fair value at inception in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is accreted to the expected put price as interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the recapture period. The remaining balance of the TCI’s capital contributioninvestment is initially recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be relieved upon delivery of the tax credit to the TCI, as a reduction in the carrying value of the subject property, net of allocated expenses. Direct and incremental costs incurred in structuring the transaction are deferred and will be recognized as an increase in the cost basis of the subject property upon the recognition of the related tax credit as discussed above.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting for Real Estate Acquisitions
On January 1, 2017,
When we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) which narrows the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) definition of a business and provides a framework that gives entities a basis for makingacquire real estate, we first make reasonable judgments about whether athe transaction involves an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 states that whenOur real estate acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets, the acquired asset is not a business. If this initial test is not met, an acquired asset cannot be considered a business unless it includes an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The primary differences between business combinations and asset acquisitions include recognition of goodwill at the acquisition date and expense recognition for transaction costs as incurred. We are applying ASU 2017-01 prospectively for acquisitions after January 1, 2017.
assets. Regardless of whether an acquisition is considered a business combination or an asset acquisition, we record the cost of the businesses or assets acquired as tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts.

We estimate the fair value of buildings acquired on an as-if-vacant basis or replacement cost basis and depreciate the building value over the estimated remaining life of the building, generally not to exceed 35 years. We determine the fair value of other fixed assets, such as site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, based upon the replacement cost and depreciate such value over the assets’ estimated remaining useful lives as determined at the applicable acquisition date. We determine the value of land either by considering the sales prices of similar properties in recent transactions or based on internal analyses of recently acquired and existing comparable properties within our portfolio. We generally determine the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. However, for certain acquired properties that are part of a ground-up development, we determine fair value by using the same valuation approach as for all other properties and deducting the estimated cost to complete the development. During the remaining construction period, we capitalize project costs until the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


development has reached substantial completion. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, is not depreciated until the development has reached substantial completion.

Intangibles primarily include the value of in-place leases and acquired lease contracts. We include all lease-related intangible assets and liabilities within acquired lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The fair value of acquired lease-related intangibles, if any, reflects: (i) the estimated value of any above and/or below market leases, determined by discounting the difference between the estimated market rent and in-place lease rent; and (ii) the estimated value of in-place leases related to the cost to obtain tenants, including leasing commissions, and an estimated value of the absorption period to reflect the value of the rent and recovery costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period as if the acquired space was vacant. We amortize any acquired lease-related intangibles to revenue or amortization expense over the remaining life of the associated lease plus any assumed bargain renewal periods. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed upon expiration, we recognize all unamortized amounts of lease-related intangibles associated with that lease in operations at that time.

We estimate the fair value of purchase option intangible assets and liabilities, if any, by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset or liability over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset or liability upon sale.
We estimate the fair value of tenant or other customer relationships acquired, if any, by considering the nature and extent of existing relationships with the tenant or customer, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant or customer, the tenant’s credit quality, expectations of lease renewals with the tenant, and the potential for significant, additional future leasing arrangements with the tenant, and we amortize that value over the expected life of the associated arrangements or leases, including the remaining terms of the related leases and any expected renewal periods. We estimate the fair value of trade names and trademarks using a royalty rate methodology and amortize that value over the estimated useful life of the trade name or trademark.
In connection with an acquisition, we may assume rights and obligations under certain lease agreements pursuant to which we become the lessee of a given property. We generally assume the lease classification previously determined by the prior lessee absent a modification in the assumed lease agreement. We assess assumed operating leases, including ground leases, to determine whether the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us given current market conditions on the acquisition date. To the extent the lease terms are favorable or unfavorable to us relative to market conditions on the acquisition date, we recognize an intangible asset or liability at fair value and amortize that asset or liability to interest or rental expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income over the applicable lease term. We include all lease-related intangibleWhere we are the lessee, we record the acquisition date values of leases, including any above or below market value, within operating lease assets and liabilities within acquiredoperating lease intangibles and accounts payable and other liabilities respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We determine the fair value of loans receivable acquired by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. We do not establish a valuation allowance at the acquisition date because the estimated future cash flows already reflect our judgment regarding their uncertainty. We recognize the difference between the acquisition date fair value and the total expected cash flows as interest income using an effective interest method over the life of the applicable loan. Subsequent to the acquisition date, we evaluate changes regarding the uncertainty of future cash flows and the need for a valuation allowance, as appropriate.
We estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests assumed consistent with the manner in which we value all of the underlying assets and liabilities.

We calculate the fair value of long-term assumed debt by discounting the remaining contractual cash flows on each instrument at the current market rate for those borrowings, which we approximate based on the rate at which we would expect to incur a replacement instrument on the date of acquisition, and recognize any fair value adjustments related to long-term debt as effective yield adjustments over the remaining term of the instrument.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate, for impairment indicators. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leasedreal estate properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than book value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. We recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.

We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may exceed its fair value. If we determine that a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated entity is other-than-temporary, and if such reduced fair value is below the carrying value, we record an impairment.

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we proceed with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, we proceed with the second step, which requires us to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.

Estimates of fair value used in our evaluation of goodwill (if necessary based on our qualitative assessment), investments in real estate, investments in unconsolidated entities and intangible assets are based upon discounted future cash flow projections or other acceptable valuation techniques that are based, in turn, upon all available evidence including level three inputs, such as revenue and expense growth rates, estimates of future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, general economic conditions and trends, or other available market data. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and to estimate and determine fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

We sell properties from time to time for various reasons, including favorable market conditions or the exercise of purchase options by tenants. We classify certain long-lived assets as held for sale once the criteria, as defined by GAAP, hashave been met. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value minus cost to sell and are no longer depreciated.

If at any time we determine that the criteria for classifying assets as held for sale are no longer met, we reclassify assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The carrying amount of these assets is adjusted (in the period in which a change in classification is determined) to reflect any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as net real estate investments.

We report discontinued operations when the following criteria are met: (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of or classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results; or (2) an acquired business that is classified as held for sale on the acquisition date. Assets relating to the CCP Spin-Off were reported as discontinued operations once the transaction was completed. The results of operations for assets meeting the definition of discontinued operations are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. We allocate estimated interest expense to discontinued operations based on property values and our weighted average interest rate or the property’s actual mortgage interest.

Loans Receivable

We record loans receivable, other than those acquired in connection with a business combination, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (either in secured loans receivable and investments, net or other assets, in the case of non-mortgage loans receivable) at the unpaid principal balance, net of any deferred origination fees, purchase discounts or premiums and valuation allowances. We amortize net deferred origination fees, which are comprised of loan fees collected from the borrower net of certain direct costs, and purchase discounts or premiums over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method and immediately recognize in income any unamortized balances if the loan is repaid before its contractual maturity.

We regularly evaluate the collectibilitycollectability of loans receivable based on factors such as corporate and facility-level financial and operational reports, compliance with financial covenants set forth in the applicable loan agreement, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantor, the payment history of the borrower and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due under the terms of the applicable loan agreement, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be collected.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Escrow Deposits and Restricted Cash

Escrow deposits consist of amounts held by us or our lenders to provide for future real estate tax, insurance expenditures and tenant improvements related to our properties and operations. Restricted cash generally represents amounts paid to us for security deposits and other similar purposes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Deferred Financing Costs

We amortize deferred financing costs, which are reported within senior notes payable and other debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related borrowings using a method that approximates a level yield. Amortized costs of approximately $18.9$20.2 million,, $17.9 $18.1 million and $18.7$18.9 million were included in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Marketable Debt and Equity
Available for Sale Securities

We record marketable debt and equityclassify available for sale securities as available-for-sale and classify them as a component of other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (other than our interests in government-sponsored pooled loan investments, which are classified as secured loans receivable and investments, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). We record these securities at fair value and include unrealized gains and losses recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We report interest income, including discount or premium amortization, on marketable debtavailable for sale securities and gains or losses on securities sold, which are based on the specific identification method, in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments

We recognize all derivative instruments in other assets or accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value as of the reporting date. We recognize changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in other expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income or accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on the intended use of the derivative and our designation of the instrument.

We do not use our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps and foreign currency forward contracts, for trading or speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts and certain of our interest rate swaps (including the interest rate swap contracts of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures) are designated as effectively hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to their underlying securities and, therefore, also are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value of these instruments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of the changes in fair value of swap contracts of our consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the change in fair value of swap contracts of our unconsolidated joint ventures in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of our other interest rate swaps and rate caps were not designated as having a hedging relationship with the underlying securities and therefore do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under GAAP. Accordingly, these interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, and we recognize changes in the fair value of these instruments in current earnings (in other expenses) in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and we determine fair value based on the assumptions that we expect market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within levels one and two of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within level three of the hierarchy).

Level one inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Level two inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in level one that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Level two inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and other inputs for the asset or liability that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves. Level three inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which typically are based on our own assumptions, because there is little, if any, related market activity. If the determination of the fair value
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the entire fair value measurement falls is the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. If the volume and level of market activity for an asset or liability has decreased significantly relative to the normal market activity for such asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that a transaction for an asset or liability is not orderly, little, if any, weight is placed on that transaction price as an
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


indicator of fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

We use the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Escrow deposits and restricted cash - The carrying amount of escrow deposits and restricted cash reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Loans receivable - We estimate the fair value of loans receivable using level two and level three inputs. We discount future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings.

Available for sale securities - We estimate the fair value of marketable debt securities using level two inputs. We observe quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. We estimate the fair value of certain government-sponsored pooled loan investments using level three inputs. We consider credit spreads, underlying asset performance and credit quality, and default rates.
Escrow deposits and restricted cash - The carrying amount of escrow deposits and restricted cash reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Derivative instruments - With the assistance of a third party, we estimate the fair value of derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts, using level two inputs.
Loans receivable - We estimate the fair value of loans receivable using level two and level three inputs. We discount future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same terms and length to maturity would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings.
Marketable debt securities - We estimate the fair value of corporate bonds, if any, using level two inputs. We observe quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. We estimate the fair value of certain government-sponsored pooled loan investments using level three inputs. We consider credit spreads, underlying asset performance and credit quality, and default rates.
Derivative instruments - With the assistance of a third party, we estimate the fair value of derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency forward contracts using level two inputs.

Interest rate caps - We observe forward yield curves and other relevant information;information.

Interest rate swaps - We observe alternative financing rates derived from market-based financing rates, forward yield curves and discount rates; andrates.

Foreign currency forward contracts - We estimate the future values of the two currency tranches using forward exchange rates that are based on traded forward points and calculate a present value of the net amount using a discount factor based on observable traded interest rates.

Senior notes payable and other debt - We estimate the fair value of senior notes payable and other debt using level two inputs. We discount the future cash flows using current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For mortgage debt, we may estimate fair value using level three inputs, similar to those used in determining fair value of loans receivable (above).
Senior notes payable and other debt - We estimate the fair value of senior notes payable and other debt using level two inputs. We discount the future cash flows using current interest rates at which we could obtain similar borrowings. For mortgage debt, we may estimate fair value using level three inputs, similar to those used in determining fair value of loans receivable (above).
Redeemable OP unitholder interests - We estimate the fair value of our redeemable OP unitholder interests using level one inputs. We base fair value on the closing price of our common stock, as OP Units may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.

Redeemable OP unitholder interests - We estimate the fair value of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interests using level one inputs. We base fair value on the closing price of our common stock, as OP Units (and previously Class C Units) may be redeemed at the election of the holder for cash or, at our option, shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
Revenue Recognition

Triple-Net Leased Properties and Office Operations

Certain of our triple-net leases and most of our MOB and life scienceresearch and innovation center (collectively, “office operations”) leases provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent. We recognize base rental revenues under these leases on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability of substantially all rents is reasonably assured.probable. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable that is included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, this cumulative excess totaled $267.6$278.8 million and $250.0 million (net of allowances of $117.8 million) and $244.6$44.6 million, (net of allowances of $109.8 million)recorded under prior accounting guidance), respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale).

Certain of our leases provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met. We recognize the increased rental revenue under these leases as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)





We assess the probability of collecting substantially all rents under our leases based on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant, the type of property, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, expected future performance of the property and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is not probable that we will be able to collect substantially all rents, we recognize a charge to rental income. If we change our conclusions regarding the probability of collecting rent payments required by a lease, we may recognize adjustments to rental income in the period we make such change in our conclusions.

Senior Living Operations
We
Our resident agreements are accounted for as leases and we recognize resident fees and services, other than move-in fees, monthly as services are provided. We recognize move-in fees on a straight-line basis over the average resident stay. Our lease agreements with residents generally have terms of 12 to 18 months and are cancelable by the resident upon 30 days’ notice.
Other
Other

We recognize interest income from loans and investments, including discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method when collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. We apply the effective interest method on a loan-by-loan basis and recognize discounts and premiums as yield adjustments over the related loan term. We recognize interest income on an impaired loan to the extent our estimate of the fair value of the collateral is sufficient to support the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest. When the balance of the loan, other receivables and all related accrued interest is equal to or less than our estimate of the fair value of the collateral, we recognize interest income on a cash basis. We provide a reserve against an impaired loan to the extent our total investment in the loan exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the loan collateral.
We recognize income from rent, lease termination fees, development services, management advisory services and all other income when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured.
Allowances
We assess the collectibility of our rent receivables, including straight-line rent receivables. We base our assessment of the collectibility of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including, among other things, payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We base our assessment of the collectibility of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including, among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve to increase or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of stock options and restricted stock, included in general, administrative and professional fees in our Consolidated Statements of Income generally on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the award.

Gain on Sale of Assets

On January 1, 2018, we adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 610-20, Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASC 610-20”). In accordance with ASC 610-20, we recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We recognizeadopted ASC 610-20 using the modified retrospective method and recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $31.2 million relating to deferred gains on sales of real estate assets only upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. We record payments received from purchasers prior to closing as deposits and classify them as other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize gains (net of any taxes) on assets sold using the full accrual method upon closing if the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, we are not obligated to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit, we have received adequate initial investment from the purchaser and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. We may defer recognition of gains in whole or in part until: (i) the profit is determinable, meaning that the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated; and (ii) the earnings process is virtually complete, meaning that we are not obliged to perform any significant activities after the sale to earn the profit.2015.

Federal Income Tax

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. Accordingly, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on net income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we continue to qualify as a REIT. However, with respect to certain of our subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS” or “TRS entities”), we record income tax expense or benefit, as those entities are subject to federal income tax similar to regular corporations. Certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to foreign income tax, although they did not elect to be treated as TRSs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur. Deferred income taxes also reflect the impact of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in the tax provision when such changes occur.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We recognize interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax benefit or expense.

Foreign Currency

Certain of our subsidiaries’ functional currencies are the local currencies of their respective foreign jurisdictions. We translate the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using average rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. We record resulting currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and we record foreign currency transaction gains and losses in other expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize any noncontrolling interests’ proportionate share of currency translation adjustments of our foreign consolidated joint ventures in noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Segment Reporting

As of December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we operated through three3 reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. Under our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. See “NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION.”
Operating Leases
We account for payments made pursuant to operating leases in our Consolidated Statements of Income based on actual rent paid, plus or minus a straight-line rent adjustment for leases that provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2017, we
We adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASU 2016-09”) which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (“ASU 2014-09”, as codified in “ASC 606”), which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 606 specifically references contracts with customers, it also applied to other transactions such as the sale of real estate. ASC 606 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and we plan to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.
We have evaluated all of our revenue streams to identify whether each revenue stream would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in the timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. Based on a review of our various revenue streams, we believe the following items in our Consolidated Statements of Income are subject to
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


ASC 606: office building and other services revenue, certain elements of our resident fees and services and gains on the sale of real estate. Our office building and other services revenues are primarily generated by management contracts where we provide management, leasing, marketing, facility development and advisory services. Resident fees and services primarily include amounts related to resident leases (subject to ASC 840, Leases842”) but also includes revenues generated through point-of-sale transactions that are ancillary to the residents’ contractual rights to occupy living and common-area space at the communities. While these revenue streams are subject to the provisions of ASC 606, we believe that the pattern and timing of recognition of income will be consistent with the current accounting model.
As it relates to gains on sale of real estate, we will apply the provisions of ASC 610-20, Gain or Loss From Derecognition of Non-financial Assets (“ASC 610-20”), and we expect to recognize any gains when we transfer control of a property and when it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the related consideration. We will no longer apply existing sales criteria in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We will recognize on January 1, 2018, through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, $31.2 million of deferred gains relating to sales of real estate assets in 2015. Other than the cumulative effect adjustment relating to such deferred gains, the adoption of ASC 606 and ASC 610-20 will not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our remaining implementation item includes finalizing revised disclosures in accordance with the new standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”),2019, which introducesintroduced a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and, among other changes, eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The FASB also issued an Exposure Draft on January 5, 2018 proposing to amend ASU 2016-02,

ASC 842 allows for several practical expedients which would provide lessors with a practical expedient, by classpermit the following: no reassessment of underlying assets, to not separatelease classification or initial direct costs; use of the standard’s effective date as the date of initial application; and no separation of non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02We elected these practical expedients using the effective date as our date of initial application. Therefore, financial information and the related Exposure Draftdisclosures under ASC 842 are not effectiveprovided for us untilperiods prior to January 1, 2019,2019.

Upon adoption, we recognized both right of use assets and lease liabilities for leases in which we lease land, real property or other equipment. We now also report revenues and expenses within our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment for real estate taxes and insurance that are escrowed and obligations of the tenants in accordance with earlytheir respective leases with us. This reporting had no impact on our net income. Resident leases within our senior living operations reportable business segment and office leases also contain service elements. We elected the practical expedient to account for our resident and office leases as a single lease component. Also, we now expense certain leasing costs, other than leasing commissions, as they are incurred. Prior to the adoption permitted.of ASC 842, GAAP provided for the deferral and amortization of such costs over the applicable lease term. We are continuing to evaluate this guidance and the impact to us,amortize any unamortized deferred lease costs as both lessor and lessee,of December 31, 2018 over their respective lease terms.

As of January 1, 2019 we recognized operating lease assets of $361.7 million on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We expectBalance Sheets which includes the present value of minimum lease payments as well as certain existing above and/or below market lease intangible values associated with such leases. Also upon adoption, we recognized operating lease liabilities of $216.9 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The present value of minimum lease payments was calculated on each lease using a discount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate primarily adjusted for the length of the individual lease terms. As of the January 1, 2019 adoption date, we utilized discount rates ranging from 6.15% to utilize the practical expedients proposed in the Exposure Draft7.60% for our ground leases.
Upon adoption, we recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $0.6 million primarily relating to certain costs associated with unexecuted leases that were deferred as part of our adoption of ASU 2016-02.December 31, 2018.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, ClassificationNo. 2016-13, Measurement of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash PaymentsCredit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-15”2016-13”), which provides clarification regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified. The amendments in the statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires2016-13 require an entity to showevaluate a current estimate of all expected credit losses over the changeslife of a financial instrument, which may result in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cashearlier recognition of credit losses on loans and restricted cash equivalentsother financial instruments. Under existing guidance, an entity generally only considered past events and current conditions in the statement of cash flows.measuring an incurred loss. ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18 are effective for us beginning January 1, 2018 and will be applied by us using a retrospective transition method. Adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory (“ASU 2016-16”), which requires a company to recognize the tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-162016-13 is effective for us beginning January 1, 20182020 and will be applied by us using a modified retrospective method.we are still evaluating the impact of adoption. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.



NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK


As of December 31, 2017,2019, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred managed or operated approximately 22.3%20.4%, 10.8%10.3%, 7.5%7.7%, 4.9%4.7% and 1.1%1.0%, respectively, of our consolidated real estate investments based on gross book value (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017)2019). Because Atria and Sunrise manage our properties in exchange for the receipt of a management fee from us, we are not directly exposed to the credit risk of our managers in the same manner or to the same extent as our triple-net tenants.


Based on gross book value, approximately 25.9%18.8% and 35.1%43.4% of our consolidated real estate investments were seniors housing communities included in the triple-net leased properties and senior living operations reportable business segments, respectively (excluding properties classified as held for sale and properties owned through investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2017)2019). MOBs, life scienceresearch and innovation centers, IRFs and LTACs, health systems, SNFsskilled nursing facilities (“SNFs”) and secured loans receivable and investments collectively comprised the remaining 39.0%37.8%. Our consolidated properties were located in 4645 states, the District of Columbia, seven7 Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom as of December 31, 2017,2019, with properties in one
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


1 state (California) accounting for more than 10% of our total continuing revenues and net operating income (“NOI,” which is defined as total revenues, excluding interest and other income, less property-level operating expenses and office building services costs) for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017.


Triple-Net Leased Properties


The following table reflects ourthe concentration risk related to our triple-net leased properties for the periods presented:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Revenues(1):
     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7% 4.3% 4.7%
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 3.1
Kindred(3)
3.3
 3.5
 4.6
NOI:     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.7% 7.6% 8.0%
Ardent5.8
 5.7
 5.3
Kindred(3)
6.3
 6.4
 7.9

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Revenues(1):
     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
4.7% 4.8% 5.3%
Ardent3.1
 3.1
 1.3
Kindred(3)
4.6
 5.4
 5.7
NOI:     
Brookdale Senior Living(2)
8.0% 8.3% 9.3%
Ardent5.3
 5.3
 2.3
Kindred(3)
7.9
 9.2
 9.9


(1) 
Total revenues include office building and other services revenue, income from loans and investments and interest and other income.
(2) 
Excludes one seniors housing community included in2018 results include the senior living operations reportable business segment at December 31, 2017.impact of a net non-cash charge of $21.3 million related to April 2018 lease extensions.
(3) 
Excludes one MOB included in the office operations reportable business segment.2017 results include amounts related to 36 SNFs that were sold during 2017.
    
Each of our leases with Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred is a triple-net lease that obligates the tenant to pay all property-related expenses, including maintenance, utilities, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures, and to comply with the terms of the mortgage financing documents, if any, affecting the properties. In addition, each of our Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred leases has a corporate guaranty. Brookdale Senior Living has multiple leases with us and those leases contain cross-default provisions tied to each other, as well as lease renewals by lease agreement or by pool of assets.


The properties we lease to Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred accounted for a significant portion of our triple-net leased properties segment revenues and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. If any of Brookdale
Senior Living, Ardent or Kindred becomes unable or unwilling to satisfy its obligations to us or to renew its leases with us upon expiration of the terms thereof, our financial condition and results of operations could decline, and our ability to service our indebtedness and to make distributions to our stockholders could be impaired. We cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their respective obligations to us, and any failure, inability or unwillingness by Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent andor Kindred to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity, our ability to service our indebtedness and other obligations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, as required for us to continue to qualify as a REIT (a “Material Adverse Effect”). We also cannot assure you that Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent and Kindred will elect to renew their respective leases with us upon expiration of the leases or that we will be able to reposition any non-renewed properties on a timely basis or on the same or better economic terms, if at all.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

In April 2018, we entered into various agreements with Brookdale Senior Living that provide for, among other things: (a) a consolidation of substantially all of our multiple lease agreements with Brookdale Senior Living into 1 master lease; (b) extension of the term for substantially all of our Brookdale Senior Living leased properties until December 31, 2025, with Brookdale Senior Living retaining 2 successive 10 year renewal options; and (c) the guarantee of all the Brookdale Senior Living obligations to us by Brookdale Senior Living Inc., including covenant protections for us. In connection with these agreements, we recognized a net non-cash expense of $21.3 million for the acceleration of straight-line rent receivables, net unamortized market lease intangibles and deferred revenues, which is included in triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We also received a fee of $2.5 million that is being amortized over the new lease term.


In July 2018, Kindred closed transactions (the “Go Private Transactions”) pursuant to which (a) Kindred would be acquired by a consortium of TPG Capital (“TPG”), Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (“WCAS”) and Humana, Inc. and (b) immediately following the acquisition, (i) Kindred’s home health, hospice and community care businesses would be separated from Kindred and operated as a standalone company owned by Humana, Inc., TPG and WCAS, and (ii) Kindred would be operated as a separate healthcare company owned by TPG and WCAS. In connection with the closing of the transactions, we received a payment from Kindred of $12.3 million, which was recognized in interest and other income in our Consolidated Statements of Income during the third quarter of 2018.

The following table sets forth the future contracted minimum rentals, excluding contingent rent escalations, but including straight-line rent adjustments and reserves where applicable, for all of our consolidated triple-net and office building leases as of December 31, 20172019 (excluding properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017)2019):
 Brookdale Senior Living Ardent Kindred Other Total
 (In thousands)
2020$184,141
 $122,348
 $130,790
 $891,141
 $1,328,420
2021183,774
 122,348
 130,786
 829,610
 1,266,518
2022183,398
 122,348
 130,790
 743,575
 1,180,111
2023183,000
 122,348
 110,365
 680,422
 1,096,135
2024182,600
 122,348
 100,153
 627,798
 1,032,899
Thereafter182,189
 1,292,096
 40,358
 2,633,754
 4,148,397
Total$1,099,102
 $1,903,836
 $643,242
 $6,406,300
 $10,052,480

 Brookdale Senior Living Ardent Kindred Other Total
 (In thousands)
2018$162,346
 $113,361
 $126,087
 $966,445
 $1,368,239
2019151,999
 113,361
 126,127
 912,556
 1,304,043
202035,192
 113,361
 126,169
 860,246
 1,134,968
202114,071
 113,361
 126,211
 799,658
 1,053,301
20223,339
 113,361
 126,254
 699,060
 942,014
Thereafter7,498
 1,435,906
 247,566
 3,580,776
 5,271,746
Total$374,445
 $2,002,711
 $878,414
 $7,818,741
 $11,074,311


Senior Living Operations


As of December 31, 2017,2019, Atria and Sunrise, collectively, provided comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to 273260 of our 297401 consolidated seniors housing communities, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.


We rely on our managers’ personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our senior living operations efficiently and effectively. We also rely on our managers to set appropriate resident fees and otherwise operate our seniors housing communities in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. Although we have various rights as the property owner under our management agreements, including various rights to terminate and exercise remedies under the agreements as provided therein, Atria’s or Sunrise’s failure, inability or unwillingness to satisfy its respective obligations under those agreements, to efficiently and effectively manage our properties or to provide timely and accurate accounting information with respect thereto could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, significant changes in Atria’s or Sunrise’s senior management or
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


equity ownership or any adverse developments in their businesses or financial condition could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.

Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to certain rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint two of six members on the Atria Board of Directors.


Brookdale Senior Living, Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent Information


Each of Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred is subject to the reporting requirements of the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is required to file with the SEC annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Kindred is not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC, but was subject to such reporting requirements prior to the closing of the Go Private Transactions in July 2018. The information related to Brookdale Senior Living and Kindred contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from SEC filings made by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, as the case may be, or other publicly available information, or was provided to us by Brookdale Senior Living or Kindred, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy. We are providing this data for informational purposes only, and you are encouraged to obtain Brookdale Senior Living’s and Kindred’s publicly available filings, which can be found at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.


Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent are not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC. The information related to Kindred, Atria, Sunrise and Ardent contained or referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been derived from publicly available information or was provided to us by Kindred, Atria, Sunrise or Ardent, as the case may be, and we have not verified this information through an independent investigation or otherwise. We have no reason to believe that this information is inaccurate in any material respect, but we cannot assure you of its accuracy.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY


The following summarizes our acquisition and development activities during 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. We acquire and invest in seniors housing, research and innovation and healthcare properties primarily to achieve an expected yield on our investment, to grow and diversify our portfolio and revenue base, and to reduce our dependence on any single tenant, operator or manager, geographic location, asset type, business model or revenue source.


2019 Acquisitions

In September 2019, we acquired an 87% interest in 34 Canadian seniors housing communities (including 5 in-process developments) valued at $1.8 billion through an equity partnership (the “LGM Acquisition”) with Le Groupe Maurice (“LGM”).  The portfolio continues to be managed by LGM.  We also have rights to fund and own all additional developments under an exclusive pipeline agreement with LGM.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we also acquired 2 properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (1 research and innovation center and 1 MOB), 2 seniors housing communities reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment and 1 vacant land parcel for an aggregate purchase price of $237.0 million.

Each of our 2019 acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.

2018 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we acquired 5 properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (4 MOBs and 1 research and innovation center) and 1 seniors housing community reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment for an aggregate purchase price of $311.3 million. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.

2017 Acquisitions


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we acquired 15 triple-net leased properties (including six6 assets previously owned by an equity method investee), four4 properties reported within our office operations reportable business segment (three life science,(3 research and medical assetsinnovation centers and one1 MOB) and three3 seniors housing communities (reported within our senior living operations reportable business segment) for an aggregate purchase price of $691.3 million. Each of these acquisitions was accounted for as an asset acquisition.


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed the development of one triple-net leased property, representing $6.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

2016 Acquisitions

Life Sciences Acquisition

In September 2016, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the university affiliated life science and innovation real estate assets of Wexford from Blackstone for total consideration of $1.5 billion. The properties acquired will continue to be managed by Wexford, which will remain a separate management company owned and operated by the existing Wexford management team. We have exclusive rights to fund and own future life science projects developed by Wexford.

Other 2016 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we made other investments totaling approximately $42.3 million, including the acquisition of one triple-net leased property and two MOBs.
Completed Developments

During 2016, we completed the development of three triple-net leased properties (two of which were expansions of existing seniors housing assets), representing $31.9 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Estimated Fair ValueNOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS

2019 Activity
We accounted for our 2016 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our 2016 real estate acquisitions, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:

  Triple-Net Leased Properties Office Operations Total
 (In thousands)
Land and improvements $1,579
 $63,526
 $65,105
Buildings and improvements 12,558
 1,311,676
 1,324,234
Acquired lease intangibles 163
 200,022
 200,185
Other assets 
 99,777
 99,777
Total assets acquired 14,300
 1,675,001
 1,689,301
Notes payable and other debt 
 47,641
 47,641
Intangible liabilities 
 103,769
 103,769
Other liabilities 380
 64,792
 65,172
Total liabilities assumed 380
 216,202
 216,582
Noncontrolling interest assumed 
 24,656
 24,656
Net assets acquired 13,920
 1,434,143
 1,448,063
Cash acquired 
 19,119
 19,119
Total cash used $13,920
 $1,415,024
 $1,428,944

For certain acquisitions, the determination of fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has changed. We made certain adjustments during 2017 due primarily to reclassification adjustments for presentation and adjustments to our valuation assumptions. The changes to our valuation assumptions were based on more accurate information concerning the subject assets and liabilities. None of these changes had a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Aggregate Revenue and NOI

ForDuring the year ended December 31, 2016, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our completed 2016 acquisitions during our period of ownership were $55.7 million and $37.7 million, respectively.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During 2016,2019, we expensed as incurred $19.1 million related to our completed 2016 transactions.

2015 Acquisitions

HCT Acquisition

In January 2015, we acquired American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc. (“HCT”) in a stock and cash transaction, which added 152 properties to our portfolio. At the effective time of the merger, each share of HCT common stock outstanding (other than shares held by us, HCT or our respective subsidiaries, which shares were canceled) was converted into the right to receive either 0.1688 shares of our common stock (with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares) or $11.33 per share in cash, at the election of each HCT shareholder. Shares of HCT common stock for which a valid election was not made were converted into the stock consideration. We funded the transaction through the issuance of approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million limited partnership units that were redeemable for shares of our common stock and the payment of approximately $11 million in cash (excluding cash in lieu of fractional shares). In addition, we assumed approximately $167
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


million of mortgage debt and repaid approximately $730 million of debt, net of HCT cash on hand. In August 2015, 20 of the properties that we acquired in the HCT acquisition were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off.

Ardent Health Services Acquisition

On August 4, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Ardent Medical Services, Inc. and simultaneous separation and sale of the Ardent hospital operating company to a consortium composed of an entity controlled by Equity Group Investments, Ardent’s management team and us (collectively the “Ardent Transaction”). As of the acquisition date, we recorded the estimated fair value of our investment in owned hospital and other real estate of approximately $1.3 billion. At closing, we paid $26.3 million for our 9.9% interest in Ardent which represents our estimate of the acquisition date fair value of this interest. Upon closing, we entered into a long-term triple-net master lease with Ardent to operate the ten hospital campuses and other real estate we acquired.

Other 2015 Acquisitions

In 2015, we made other investments totaling approximately $612 million, including the acquisition of eleven triple-net
leased properties; nine MOBs (including eight MOBs that we had previously accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities; see “NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES”) and 12 skilled nursing facilities (all of which were disposed of as part of the CCP Spin-Off).

Completed Developments

During 2015, we completed the development of one triple-net leased seniors housing community, representing $9.3 million of net real estate property on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015.

Estimated Fair Value

We accounted for our 2015 acquisitions under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC 805. The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which we determined using level two and level three inputs:
 Triple-Net Leased Properties Senior Living Operations Office Operations Total
 (In thousands)
Land and improvements$190,566
 $70,713
 $173,307
 $434,586
Buildings and improvements1,726,063
 703,080
 1,214,546
 3,643,689
Acquired lease intangibles169,362
 83,867
 184,540
 437,769
Other assets174,093
 272,888
 402,734
 849,715
Total assets acquired2,260,084
 1,130,548
 1,975,127
 5,365,759
Notes payable and other debt
 77,940
 99,917
 177,857
Other liabilities45,924
 45,408
 46,565
 137,897
Total liabilities assumed45,924
 123,348
 146,482
 315,754
Net assets acquired$2,214,160
 $1,007,200
 $1,828,645
 5,050,005
Redeemable OP unitholder interests assumed      88,085
Cash acquired      59,584
Equity issued      2,216,355
Total cash used      $2,685,981

Included in other assets above is $746.9 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. A substantial amount of this goodwill was due to an increase in our stock price between the announcement date and closing dates of the HCT acquisition. Goodwill has been allocated to our reportable business segments based on the respective fair value of the net assets acquired, as follows:sold 10 triple-net leased properties, - $133.6 million;8 MOBs, 6 seniors housing assets and our leasehold interest in 1 vacant land parcel for aggregate consideration of $147.5 million, and we recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $26.0 million.

2018 Activity
During 2018, we sold 7 seniors housing communities included in our senior living operations - $219.1 million;reportable business segment, 5 triple-net leased properties, 11 MOBs and office operations - $394.22 vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $348.6 million.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Aggregate Revenue and NOI

For We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $46.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, aggregate revenue and NOI derived from our 2015 real estate acquisitions during our period of ownership were $327.0 million and $201.9 million, respectively, excluding revenue and NOI for any assets contributed in the CCP Spin-Off.2018.

Transaction Costs

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01, transaction costs are expensed as incurred and included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ending December 31, 2015, we expensed as incurred $99.0 million of costs related to our completed 2015 transactions, $4.1 million of which is reported within discontinued operations. These transaction costs exclude any separation costs associated with the CCP Spin-Off (refer to “NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”).


NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS
2017 Activity


During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold 53 triple-net leased properties, five5 MOBs and certain vacant land parcels for aggregate consideration of $870.8 million, and we recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $717.3 million, net of taxes.million.


SNF Dispositions

In November 2016, we entered into agreements with Kindred providing that Kindred will either acquire all 36 SNFs owned by us and operated by Kindred (the “Ventas SNFs”) for $700 million, in connection with Kindred’s previously announced plan to exit its SNF business; or, renew the current lease on all unpurchased Ventas SNFs not purchased by Kindred by April 30, 2018 until 2025 at the current rent level plus annual escalations. On June 30, 2017, Kindred announced that it had signed definitive agreements to sell its entire SNF business to an affiliate of Blue Mountain Capital Management, LLC and that, as Kindred closes on the sale of its SNFs, Kindred will pay to us its allocable portion of the sale proceeds for a total of approximately $700 million aggregate purchase price for the Ventas SNFs, and we will convey the applicable Ventas SNFs to the ultimate buyer. 

During 2017, we sold the 36 Ventas SNFs, included in the 53 triple-net properties described above, for aggregate consideration of approximately $700 million and recognized a gain on the sale of these assets of $657.6 million, net of taxes.

2016 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 29 triple-net leased properties, one seniors housing community included in our senior living operations reportable business segment and six MOBs for aggregate consideration of $300.8 million. We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $98.2 million, net of taxes.

2015 Activity

During 2015, we sold 39 triple-net leased properties and 26 MOBs for aggregate consideration of $541.0 million, including lease termination fees of $6.0 million, included within triple-net leased rental income in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognized a gain on the sales of these assets of $46.3 million, net of taxes, of which $27.4 million is being deferred due to one secured loan of $78.4 million and one non-mortgage loan of $20.0 million, we made to the buyers in connection with the sales of certain assets.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Assets Held for Sale


The table below summarizes our real estate assets classified as held for sale as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, including the amounts reported within other assets and accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets:
  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for Sale Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for Sale
  (Dollars in thousands)
Triple-net leased properties 8
 $62,098
 $1,623
 1
 $5,482
 $40
Office operations (1)
 1
 5,177
 499
 
 160
 152
Senior living operations  (1)
 6
 24,158
 3,341
 
 (188) 13
Total 15
 $91,433
 $5,463
 1
 $5,454
 $205

  December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for Sale Number of Properties Held for Sale Assets Held for Sale Liabilities Held for Sale
  (Dollars in thousands)
Triple-net leased properties 
 $
 $
 
 $
 $
Office operations 8
 100,324
 61,202
 7
 53,151
 1,462
Senior living operations  (1)
 
 
 
 
 1,810
 
Total 8
 $100,324
 $61,202
 7
 $54,961
 $1,462


(1) 
Includes one vacant land parcel classified as held for sale as December 31, 2016, which was sold during 2017.Balances relate to anticipated post-closing settlements of working capital.


In March 2018, 5 MOBs no longer met the criteria as being classified as held for sale. As a result, we adjusted the carrying amount of these assets by recognizing depreciation expense of $5.7 million and classified these assets within net real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented.

Real Estate Impairment


We recognized impairments of $37.5$133.6 million, $35.2$29.5 million and $42.2$32.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 respectively, which are recorded primarily as a component of depreciation and amortization and relate primarily toin our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment.Consolidated Statements of Income. Our recorded impairments were primarily the result of a change in our intent to hold the impaired assets. In most cases, we recognized an impairment in the periods in which our change in intent was made.


CCP Spin-Off

On August 17, 2015,Additionally, we completedrecognized impairments of $52.5 million and $4.6 million for the CCP Spin-Off. In connection with the CCP Spin-Off, we disposed of 355 triple-net leased skilled nursing facilitiesyears ended December 31, 2018 and other healthcare assets operated by private regional and local care providers. The CCP Spin-Off was effectuated through a distribution of the common shares of CCP to holders of our common stock as of the distribution record date, and qualified2017, respectively, as a tax-free distribution toresult of natural disasters which are recorded as a component of other in our stockholders. For every four sharesConsolidated Statements of Ventas common stock heldIncome. There were 0 impairments recorded as a result of the distribution record date of August 10, 2015, Ventas stockholders received one CCP common share on August 17, 2015. On August 17, 2015, just prior to the effective time of the spin-off, CCP (as our then wholly owned subsidiary) received approximately $1.4 billion of proceeds from a recently completed term loan and revolving credit facility. CCP paid us a distribution of $1.3 billion from these proceeds. We used this distribution from CCP to pay down our existing debt of $1.1 billion and to pay for a portion of our quarterly installment of dividends to our stockholders of $0.2 billion.

The historical results of operations of the CCP properties as well as the related assets and liabilities have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Discontinued operations also include separation costs incurred to complete the CCP Spin-Off of $42.3 millionnatural disasters for the year ended December 31, 2015. Separation costs for 2015 include $3.5 million2019. We believe there is insurance coverage to mitigate these events. However, there can be no assurance regarding the amount or timing of stock-based compensation expense representing the incremental fair value of previously vested stock-based compensation awards as of the spin date. In addition, the assets and liabilities of CCP are presented separately from assets and liabilities from continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows include within operating, investing and financing cash flows those activities which related to our period of ownership of the CCP properties.any future recoveries. Such recoveries will be recognized when collection is deemed probable.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




The following is a summary of the assets and liabilities of CCP at the CCP Spin-Off date:
 August 17, 2015
 (In thousands)
Assets 
Net real estate investments$2,588,255
Cash and cash equivalents1,749
Goodwill135,446
Assets held for sale7,610
Other assets15,089
Total assets2,748,149
  
Liabilities 
Accounts payable and other liabilities217,760
Liabilities related to assets held for sale985
Total liabilities218,745
  
Net assets$2,529,404
Summarized financial information for CCP discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Revenues     
Rental income$
 $
 $196,848
Income from loans and investments
 
 2,148
Interest and other income
 
 63
 
 
 199,059
Expenses     
Interest
 
 61,613
Depreciation and amortization
 
 79,479
General, administrative and professional fees
 
 9
Merger-related expenses and deal costs110
 922
 46,402
Other
 
 1,332
 110
 922
 188,835
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(110) (922) 10,224
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 120
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders$(110) $(922) $10,104
Capital and development project expenditures relating to CCP for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $21.8 million. Other than capital and development project expenditures there were no other significant non-cash operating or investing activities relating to CCP.

We and CCP entered into a transition services agreement prior to the CCP Spin-Off pursuant to which we and our subsidiaries provided to CCP, on an interim, transitional basis, various services. The services provided include information technology, accounting and tax services. The overall fee charged by us for such services (the "Service Fee") was $2.5 million for one year. We recognized income of $1.6 million and $0.9 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to the Service Fee, which was payable in four quarterly installments. The transition services agreement terminated on August 31, 2016.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, we had $1.4$1.0 billion and $754.6$756.5 million, respectively, of net loans receivable and investments relating to seniors housing and healthcare operators or properties. The following is a summary of our loans receivable and investments, net, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, including amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-saleavailable for sale investments:
  Carrying Amount Amortized Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain
  (In thousands)
As of December 31, 2019:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other, net $645,546
 $645,546
 $646,925
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net(1)
 59,066
 52,178
 59,066
 6,888
Total investments reported as secured loans receivable and investments, net 704,612
 697,724
 705,991
 6,888
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 63,724
 63,724
 63,538
 
Marketable debt securities (2)
 237,360
 213,062
 237,360
 24,298
Total loans receivable and investments, net $1,005,696
 $974,510
 $1,006,889
 $31,186
  Carrying Amount Amortized Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain
  (In thousands)
As of December 31, 2017:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other $1,291,694
 $1,291,694
 $1,286,322
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 54,665
 53,863
 54,665
 802
Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net 1,346,359
 1,345,557
 1,340,987
 802
         
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 59,857
 59,857
 58,849
 
Total investments reported as Other assets 59,857
 59,857
 58,849
 
Total loans receivable and investments, net $1,406,216
 $1,405,414
 $1,399,836
 $802

As of December 31, 2018:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other, net $439,491
 $439,491
 $425,290
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net(3)
 56,378
 49,601
 56,378
 6,777
Total investments reported as secured loans receivable and investments, net 495,869
 489,092
 481,668
 6,777
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 54,164
 54,164
 54,081
 
Marketable debt securities (4)
 206,442
 197,473
 206,442
 8,969
Total loans receivable and investments, net $756,475
 $740,729
 $742,191
 $15,746

  Carrying Amount Amortized Cost Fair Value Unrealized Gain
  (In thousands)
As of December 31, 2016:        
Secured/mortgage loans and other $646,972
 $646,972
 $655,981
 $
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments(1)
 55,049
 53,810
 55,049
 1,239
Total investments reported as Secured loans receivable and investments, net 702,021
 700,782
 711,030
 1,239
         
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net 52,544
 52,544
 53,626
 
Total investments reported as Other assets 52,544

52,544

53,626


Total loans receivable and investments, net $754,565
 $753,326
 $764,656
 $1,239


(1) 
InvestmentsAs of December 31, 2019, investments in government-sponsored pool loans have contractual maturity dates in 2021 and 2023.
(2)
As of December 31, 2019, investments in marketable debt securities have contractual maturity dates in 2024 and 2026.
(3)
As of December 31, 2018, investments in government-sponsored pooled loans have contractual maturity dates in 2023.
(4)
As of December 31, 2018, investments in marketable debt securities have contractual maturity dates in 2026.


20172019 Activity

In April 2019, we purchased $5.0 million and $10.5 million of senior secured notes issued by a healthcare company which mature in 2024 and 2026, respectively. The 2024 and 2026 notes were purchased at a price of 102% and 98% of par, respectively, and have an effective interest rate of 8.1% and 8.3%, respectively. These marketable debt securities are classified as available for sale and are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.

In June 2019, we provided new secured debt financing of $490 million to certain subsidiaries of Colony Capital, Inc. The London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) based debt financing has a five-year term (inclusive of 3 one-year extension options). In connection with this transaction, our previous secured loan to certain subsidiaries of Colony Capital, Inc. of $282 million was paid in full and we recognized a gain of $0.5 million in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

In July 2019, we closed the first phase of the LGM Acquisition by funding C$947 million (US $723 million) to LGM as a bridge loan to enable LGM to buy out its former partner. The bridge loan and all outstanding interest was fully repaid in September 2019 upon the closing of the LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY.”

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


2018 Activity
    
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, we received aggregate proceeds of $37.6 million for the partial prepayment and $35.5$862.9 million for the full repayment of the principal balances of 14 loans receivable with a weighted average interest rate of 9.1% that were due to mature between 2018 and 2033, which resulted in total gains of $0.6$27.8 million.


In March 2017,Included in the repayments above is $713 million that we provided secured debt financing to a subsidiaryreceived in June 2018 for the full repayment of Ardent to facilitate Ardent’s acquisitionthe principal balance of LHP Hospital Group, Inc., which included a $700.0 million term loan and $13.0 million then outstanding on a $60.0 million revolving line of credit feature (ofwe made to a subsidiary of Ardent. We also received a $14.0 million cash pre-payment fee and accelerated recognition of the unamortized portion ($13.2 million) of a previously received cash “upfront” fee for the loans, resulting in income of $27.2 million, which $28.0 million was outstanding at December 31, 2017). The LIBOR-based debt financing has a five-year term, a one-year lock out feature and a weighted average interest rate of approximately 9.3% as of December 31, 2017 and is guaranteed by Ardent’s parent company.

2016 Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we received aggregate proceeds of $309.0 million in final repayment of three secured loans receivable and partial repayment of one secured loan receivable and recognized gains of $9.6 million on the repayment of these loans receivable that are recorded in income from loans and investments in our Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2016.Income.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



In February 2016,June 2018, we also made a $140.0$200.0 million secured mezzanine loan investment in senior unsecured notes issued by a subsidiary of Ardent at a price of 98.6% of par relating to Class A life sciences properties in California and Massachusetts, that hasvalue. The notes have an annualeffective interest rate of 9.95%10.0% and maturesmature in 2021.2026. These marketable debt securities are classified as available for sale and are reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.


In September 2016, we acquired three non-mortgage loans receivableThere was no impact on our 9.8% equity investment in connection with the Life Sciences Acquisition.Ardent as a result of these transactions.


NOTE 7—INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
We report investments in unconsolidated entities over whose operating and financial policies we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method of accounting. We are not required to consolidate these entities because our joint venture partners have significant participating rights, nor are these entities considered VIEs, as they are controlled by equity holders with sufficient capital. At December 31, 2017, we had 25% ownership interests in joint ventures that owned 31 properties, excluding properties under development. We account for our interests in real estate joint ventures, as well as our 34% interest in Atria, 34% interest in Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”) and 9.9%9.8% interest in Ardent, which are included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, under the equity method of accounting.
With the exception of our interests in Atria and Ardent, we
We provide various services to eachour unconsolidated entityreal estate joint venture entities in exchange for fees and reimbursements. Total management fees earned in connection with these entities were $6.3$3.4 million, $6.7$5.8 million and $7.8$6.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, (whichwhich is included in office building and other services revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income).Income.

In October 2015,March 2018, we acquired the 95% controlling interestsrecognized an impairment charge of $35.7 million relating to 1 of our equity investments in eight MOBs from aan unconsolidated real estate joint venture entity in which we had a 5% interest and that we accounted for as an equity method investment. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair valueconsisting principally of our previously held equity interest and recognized a loss on re-measurement of $0.2 million,SNFs, which is included in income from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

In February 2017, we acquired the controlling interests in six triple-net leased seniors housing communities for a purchase price of $100.0 million. In connection with this acquisition, we re-measured the fair value of our previously held equity interest, resulting in a gain on re-measurement of $3.0 million, which is includedrecorded in loss from unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We completed the sale of our 25% interest to our joint venture partner in July 2018 and received $57.5 million at closing.


Since the above acquisitions, operations relating to these properties have been consolidated in our Consolidated Statements of Income.    

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




NOTE 8—INTANGIBLES

The following is a summary of our intangibles as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:intangibles:
 As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:       
Above market lease intangibles$145,891
 6.9 $181,393
 6.7
In-place and other lease intangibles1,160,261
 10.6 1,321,562
 24.7
Goodwill1,051,161
 N/A 1,050,548
 N/A
Other intangibles35,837
 10.9 35,759
 11.8
Accumulated amortization(920,742) N/A (921,107) N/A
Net intangible assets$1,472,408
 10.2 $1,668,155
 22.9
Intangible liabilities:       
Below market lease intangibles$349,357
 14.5 $356,771
 14.4
Other lease intangibles13,498
 N/A 31,418
 46.5
Accumulated amortization(203,834) N/A (191,909) N/A
Purchase option intangibles3,568
 N/A 3,568
 N/A
Net intangible liabilities$162,589
 14.5 $199,848
 17.2

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 Balance 
Remaining
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period in Years
 (Dollars in thousands)
Intangible assets:       
Above market lease intangibles$184,775
 7.0 $184,993
 6.9
In-place and other lease intangibles1,353,220
 23.6 1,325,636
 23.6
Goodwill1,034,641
 N/A 1,033,225
 N/A
Other intangibles35,890
 12.3 35,783
 11.3
Accumulated amortization(861,452) N/A (769,558) N/A
Net intangible assets$1,747,074
 21.7 $1,810,079
 21.5
Intangible liabilities:       
Below market lease intangibles$359,099
 13.7 $345,103
 14.1
Other lease intangibles40,141
 40.8 40,843
 38.5
Accumulated amortization(160,965) N/A (133,468) N/A
Purchase option intangibles3,568
 N/A 3,568
 N/A
Net intangible liabilities$241,843
 15.6 $256,046
 15.9

N/A—Not Applicable 

Above market lease intangibles and in-place and other lease intangibles are included in acquired lease intangibles within real estate investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other intangibles (including non-compete agreements, trade names and trademarks) are included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Below market lease intangibles, other lease intangibles and purchase option intangibles are included in accounts payable and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in other lease intangible assets and liabilities is due to the presentation of ground lease intangibles within operating lease assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets beginning January 1, 2019. See “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES.” For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, our net amortization related to these intangibles was $59.2 million, $49.2 million and $67.2 million, $104.5 million and $142.7 million, respectively. The following is a summary of the estimated net amortization related to these intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows:years:
 Estimated Net Amortization
 (In thousands)
2020$53,988
202146,651
202239,315
202336,107
202428,622

 Estimated Net Amortization
 (In thousands)
2018$55,591
201946,137
202040,085
202137,180
202230,580

The table below reflects the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, as of December 31, 2017:2019:
  Goodwill
  (In thousands)
Triple-net leased properties $321,781
Senior living operations 259,482
Office operations 469,898
Total goodwill $1,051,161

  Goodwill
  (In thousands)
Triple-net Leased Properties $305,261
Senior Living Operations 259,482
Office Operations 469,898
Total Goodwill $1,034,641

The $1.4 million increase in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2017 is entirely the result of foreign currency translation in our triple-net leased properties reportable business segment.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)





NOTE 9—OTHER ASSETS

The following is a summary of our other assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:assets:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables$278,833
 $250,023
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net63,724
 54,164
Marketable debt securities237,360
 206,442
Other intangibles, net5,149
 5,623
Investment in unconsolidated operating entities59,301
 56,820
Other232,929
 186,113
Total other assets$877,296
 $759,185

 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Straight-line rent receivables, net$267,579
 $244,580
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net59,857
 52,544
Other intangibles, net6,496
 8,190
Investment in unconsolidated operating entities49,738
 28,431
Other189,275
 184,619
Total other assets$572,945
 $518,364


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




NOTE 10—SENIOR NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER DEBT

The following is a summary of our senior notes payable and other debt as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:debt:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$120,787
 $765,919
Commercial paper notes567,450
 
Secured revolving construction credit facility due 2022160,492
 90,488
3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019 (2)

 293,319
2.70% Senior Notes due 2020
 500,000
Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series F due 2021 (2)
231,018
 
4.25% Senior Notes due 2022
 600,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2022500,000
 500,000
3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022 (2)
192,515
 183,325
Unsecured term loan due 2023200,000
 300,000
3.125% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 400,000
3.10% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 400,000
2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023 (2)
211,767
 201,657
Unsecured term loan due 2024
 600,000
3.50% Senior Notes due 2024400,000
 
3.75% Senior Notes due 2024400,000
 400,000
4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (2)
192,515
 183,324
2.80% Senior Notes, Series E due 2024 (2)
462,036
 
Unsecured term loan due 2025 (2)
385,030
 
3.50% Senior Notes due 2025600,000
 600,000
2.65% Senior Notes due 2025450,000
 
4.125% Senior Notes due 2026500,000
 500,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2026450,000
 450,000
3.85% Senior Notes due 2027400,000
 400,000
4.00% Senior Notes due 2028650,000
 650,000
4.40% Senior Notes due 2029750,000
 750,000
3.00% Senior Notes due 2030650,000
 
6.90% Senior Notes due 203752,400
 52,400
6.59% Senior Notes due 203822,823
 22,823
5.45% Senior Notes due 2043
 258,750
5.70% Senior Notes due 2043300,000
 300,000
4.375% Senior Notes due 2045300,000
 300,000
4.875% Senior Notes due 2049300,000
 
Mortgage loans and other1,996,969
 1,127,697
Total12,245,802
 10,829,702
Deferred financing costs, net(79,939) (69,615)
Unamortized fair value adjustment20,056
 (1,163)
Unamortized discounts(27,146) (25,225)
Senior notes payable and other debt$12,158,773
 $10,733,699


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Unsecured revolving credit facility (1)
$535,832
 $146,538
Secured revolving construction credit facility due 20222,868
 
1.250% Senior Notes due 2017
 300,000
2.00% Senior Notes due 2018700,000
 700,000
Unsecured term loan due 2018 (2)

 200,000
Unsecured term loan due 2019 (2)

 371,215
4.00% Senior Notes due 2019600,000
 600,000
3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019 (3)
318,041
 297,841
2.700% Senior Notes due 2020500,000
 500,000
Unsecured term loan due 2020900,000
 900,000
4.750% Senior Notes due 2021700,000
 700,000
4.25% Senior Notes due 2022600,000
 600,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2022500,000
 500,000
3.300% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022 (3)
198,776
 186,150
3.125% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 400,000
3.100% Senior Notes due 2023400,000
 
2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023 (3)
218,653
 
3.750% Senior Notes due 2024400,000
 400,000
4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024 (3)
198,776
 186,150
3.500% Senior Notes due 2025600,000
 600,000
4.125% Senior Notes due 2026500,000
 500,000
3.25% Senior Notes due 2026450,000
 450,000
3.850% Senior Notes due 2027400,000
 
6.90% Senior Notes due 203752,400
 52,400
6.59% Senior Notes due 203822,973
 22,973
5.45% Senior Notes due 2043258,750
 258,750
5.70% Senior Notes due 2043300,000
 300,000
4.375% Senior Notes due 2045300,000
 300,000
Mortgage loans and other1,308,564
 1,718,897
Total11,365,633
 11,190,914
Deferred financing costs, net(73,093) (61,304)
Unamortized fair value adjustment12,139
 25,224
Unamortized discounts(28,617) (27,508)
Senior notes payable and other debt$11,276,062
 $11,127,326


(1) 
As of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, $28.7$26.2 million and $146.5$23.1 million of aggregate borrowings were denominated in Canadian dollars. Aggregate borrowings of $31.1$27.6 million and $27.8 million were denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2017. There were no aggregate borrowings denominated in British pounds as of December 31, 2016.2019 and 2018, respectively.
(2) 
As of December 31, 2016, there was $571.2 million of unsecured term loan borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, of which $92.6 million wasCanadian Dollar debt obligations shown in the form of Canadian dollars. In August 2017, we repaid the balances then outstanding on the term loans.
(3)
These borrowings are in the form of Canadian dollars.US Dollars.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Unsecured Term Loans


In April 2017, we entered into anOur unsecured credit facility is comprised of a $3.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 0.875%, that replaced our previous $2.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility priced at LIBOR plus 1.0%. The new unsecured credit facility was also comprisedas of our $200.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2018 and our $278.6 million term loan that was scheduled to mature inDecember 31, 2019. The 2018 and 2019 term loans were priced at LIBOR plus 1.05%. In August 2017, we used most of the proceeds from the sale of 22 SNFs to repay the balances then outstanding on the 2018 and 2019 term loans, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million. See "NOTE 5—DISPOSITIONS”.    

The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in 2021, but may be extended at our option subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions for two2 additional periods of six months each. The unsecured revolving credit facility also includes an accordion feature that permits us to increase our aggregate borrowing capacity thereunder to up to $3.75 billion.


Our unsecured credit facility imposes certain customary restrictions on us, including restrictions pertaining to: (i) liens; (ii) investments; (iii) the incurrence of additional indebtedness; (iv) mergers and dissolutions; (v) certain dividend, distribution and other payments; (vi) permitted businesses; (vii) transactions with affiliates; (viii) agreements limiting certain liens; and (ix) the maintenance of certain consolidated total leverage, secured debt leverage, unsecured debt leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios and minimum consolidated adjusted net worth, and contains customary events of default.


In January 2019, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”), established an unsecured commercial paper program. Under the terms of the program, we may issue from time to time unsecured commercial paper notes up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1.0 billion. The notes are sold under customary terms in the United States commercial paper note market and are ranked pari passu with all of Ventas Realty’s other unsecured senior indebtedness. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc. As of December 31, 2019, $567.5 million was outstanding under our commercial paper program.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $535.82019, $120.8 million of borrowingswas outstanding $14.5 million of letters of credit outstanding and $2.4 billion of unused borrowing capacity available under ourthe unsecured revolving credit facility.    facility with an additional $24.0 million restricted to support outstanding letters of credit. In addition, we limit our utilization of the unsecured revolving credit facility in order to maintain liquidity and to support our commercial paper program. Including these internal limits, we had $2.3 billion in available liquidity under the unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2019.


In June 2019, we repaid $100.0 million of the balance outstanding on the $300.0 million unsecured term loan that matures in 2023 and repaid in full the $600.0 million unsecured term loan that was set to mature in 2024 and, as a result, we recognized a non-cash charge to loss on extinguishment of debt of $3.2 million during the second quarter of 2019. We originally entered into this $900.0 million unsecured term loan facility in June 2018, which replaced and repaid in full our previous $900.0 million unsecured term loan due 2020.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we also had a $900.0$200.0 million unsecured term loan due 2020 priced at LIBOR plus 0.975%.0.90% that matures in 2023.  The term loan also includes an accordion feature that effectively permits us to increase our aggregate borrowings thereunder to up to $800.0 million.        


In September 2017,As of December 31, 2019, we entered intohad a new $400.0 million secured revolving construction credit facility whichwith $160.5 million of borrowings outstanding. The secured revolving construction credit facility matures in 2022 and will beis primarily used to finance life sciencethe development of research and innovation centercenters and other construction projects. As of December 31, 2017, there were $2.9

In September 2019, we entered into a new C$500 million of borrowings outstanding under the secured revolving construction credit facility.unsecured term loan facility priced at Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) plus 0.90% that matures in 2025.


Senior Notes


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had outstanding $7.6$7.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Realty Limited Partnership (“Ventas Realty”) ($3.9 billion500.0 million of which was co-issued by Ventas Realty’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ventas Capital Corporation), approximately $75.4$75.2 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. (“NHP”) and assumed by our subsidiary, Nationwide Health Properties, LLC (“NHP LLC”), as successor to NHP, in connection with our acquisition of NHP, and C$1.21.7 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes issued by our subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited.Limited (“Ventas Canada”). All of the senior notes issued by Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited are unconditionally guaranteed by Ventas, Inc.

In May 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.125% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.343% of par, for total proceeds of $397.4 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In June 2016, we redeemed $455.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 at a public offering price of 100.335% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our May 2016 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In July 2016, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 1.55% senior notes due September 2016 of $94.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.3 million.

In September 2016, Ventas Realty issued and sold $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.25% senior notes due 2026 at a public offering price equal to 99.811% of par, for total proceeds of $449.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.

In March 2017, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.100% senior notes due 2023 at a public offering price equal to 99.280% of par, for total proceeds of $397.1 million before the underwriting discount and expenses, and $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.850% senior notes due 2027 at a public offering price equal to 99.196% of par, for total proceeds of $396.8 million before the underwriting discount and expenses.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




In April 2017, we repaid in full, at par, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 1.250% senior notes due 2017 upon maturity.

In June 2017, Ventas Canada Finance Limited issued and sold C$275.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.55% senior notes, Series D due 2023 at a price equal to 99.954% of par, for total proceeds of C$274.9 million before the agent fees and expenses. The notes were offered on a private placement basis in Canada. We used part of the proceeds to repay C$124.4 million on our unsecured term loan due 2019.

Ventas Realty’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Realty’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior in right of payment to all of our and Ventas Realty’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Realty’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Realty’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Realty’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Realty and, with respect to those senior notes co-issued by Ventas Capital Corporation, Ventas Capital Corporation).


Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are part of our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to our and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of our subsidiaries (other than Ventas Canada Finance Limited)Canada).


NHP LLC’s senior notes are part of NHP LLC’s general unsecured obligations, ranking equal in right of payment with all of NHP LLC’s existing and future senior obligations and ranking senior to all of NHP LLC’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. However, NHP LLC’s senior notes are effectively subordinated to NHP LLC’s secured indebtedness, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing that indebtedness. NHP LLC’s senior notes are also structurally subordinated to the preferred equity and indebtedness, whether secured or unsecured, of its subsidiaries.


Ventas Realty and Ventas Canada Finance Limited and NHP LLC may redeem each series of their respective senior notes (other than NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 and 6.59% senior notes due 2038), in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at the redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture (which include, in many instances, a make-whole premium), plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date.


NHP LLC’s 6.90% senior notes due 2037 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on October 1, 2027, and its 6.59% senior notes due 2038 are subject to repurchase at the option of the holders, at par, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.


2019 Activity

In January 2019, we redeemed $258.8 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 5.45% senior notes due 2043 at a public offering price at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. Notice of the redemption was given in November 2018 and, as a result, we recognized a non-cash charge to loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and $0.4 million during the first quarter of 2019.

In February 2019, Ventas Realty issued and sold $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due 2024 at a public offering price equal to 99.88% of par and $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% senior notes due 2049 at a public offering price equal to 99.77% of par.

In June 2019, Ventas Realty issued $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.65% senior notes due 2025 at a public offering price equal to 99.45% of par. The notes were settled and proceeds were received in July 2019.

In July 2019, in connection with an announced cash tender offer for such notes, we tendered $397.1 million principal amount then outstanding of our 2.70% senior notes due 2020 for a tender offer consideration of 100.37% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. In August 2019, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 2.70% senior notes due 2020 of $102.9 million. As a result of the redemption and repayment, we recognized a total loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.4 million.

In August 2019, Ventas Realty issued and sold $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes due 2030 at a public offering price equal to 99.51% of par.

In August 2019, in connection with an announced cash tender offer for such notes, we tendered $395.7 million principal amount then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022 for a tender offer consideration of 105.46% of par value, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. In September 2019, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 4.25% senior notes due 2022 of $204.3 million. As a result of the redemption and repayment, we recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $35.9 million.
In September 2019, we repaid in full, at par, C$400.0 million principal amount then outstanding of our 3.00% senior notes, Series A due 2019 upon maturity.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In November 2019, Ventas Canada issued and sold C$600 million aggregate principal amount of 2.80% senior notes, Series E due 2024 and C$300 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior notes, Series F due 2021, at a public offering price equal to 99.99% and 100.00%, respectively, of par.

2018 Activity

In February 2018, we repaid in full, at par, $700.0 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 2.00% senior notes due February 2018 upon maturity.

In February 2018, Ventas Realty issued and sold $650.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% senior notes due 2028 at a public offering price equal to 99.23% of par.

In February 2018, we redeemed $502.1 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 4.00% senior notes due April 2019 at a public offering price of 101.83% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.0 million. The redemption was funded using cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In April 2018, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 4.00% senior notes due April 2019 of $97.9 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.8 million.

In August 2018, Ventas Realty issued and sold $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.40% senior notes due 2029 at a public offering price equal to 99.95% of par.

In August 2018, we redeemed $549.5 million aggregate principal amount then outstanding of our 4.75% senior notes due 2021 at a public offering price of 104.56% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $28.3 million. The redemption was funded using proceeds from our August 2018 senior note issuance, cash on hand and borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In September 2018, we repaid the remaining balance then outstanding of our 4.75% senior notes due 2021 of $150.5 million and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.6 million.
Mortgages


At December 31, 2017,2019, we had 8889 mortgage loans outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $1.3$2.0 billion and secured by 8884 of our properties. Of these loans, 7767 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $1.0$1.3 billion bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.0%2.0% to 8.6%13.0% per annum, and 1122 loans in the aggregate principal amount of $298.0$671.1 million bear interest at variable rates ranging from 1.1%1.2% to 4.6%4.4% per annum as of December 31, 2017.2019. At December 31, 2017,2019, the weighted average annual rate on our fixed rate mortgage loans was 5.2%3.7%, and the weighted average annual rate on our variable rate mortgage loans was 2.9%3.4%. Our mortgage loans had a weighted average maturity of 5.54.2 years as of December 31, 2017.2019.


During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015,2018, we repaid in full mortgage loans in the aggregate principal amount of $411.4 million, $337.8$97.7 million and $461.9$485.7 million, respectively.

In September 2019, we assumed C$1.2 billion mortgage debt (included in the $2.0 billion above), including a fair value premium of C$16.6 million, in connection with the LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY.”
    
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Scheduled Maturities of Borrowing Arrangements and Other Provisions


AsThe following summarizes the maturities of our senior notes payable and other debt as of December 31, 2017, our indebtedness had the following maturities:2019:
 
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
 
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility and Commercial Paper Notes (1)
 
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
 Total Maturities
 (In thousands)
2020$276,653
 $567,450
 $40,291
 $884,394
2021361,046
 120,787
 38,954
 520,787
20221,269,661
 
 33,163
 1,302,824
20231,602,104
 
 19,409
 1,621,513
20241,571,967
 
 13,058
 1,585,025
Thereafter6,243,430
 
 87,829
 6,331,259
Total maturities$11,324,861
 $688,237
 $232,704
 $12,245,802

 
Principal Amount
Due at Maturity
 
Unsecured Revolving
Credit
Facility (1)
 
Scheduled Periodic
Amortization
 Total Maturities
 (In thousands)
2018$785,871
 $
 $21,576
 $807,447
20191,330,572
 
 15,759
 1,346,331
20201,451,587
 
 12,910
 1,464,497
2021772,838
 535,832
 11,505
 1,320,175
20221,419,392
 
 9,878
 1,429,270
Thereafter (2)
4,910,954
 
 86,959
 4,997,913
Total maturities$10,671,214
 $535,832
 $158,587
 $11,365,633


(1) 
AtAs of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $81.4$581.9 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, for $454.5 million of net borrowings outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facility.
(2)
Includes $52.4facility and commercial paper program, net of $106.4 million aggregate principal amount of 6.90% senior notes due 2037 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on October 1, 2027,unrestricted cash and $23.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.59% senior notes due 2038 that is subject to repurchase, at the option of the holders, on July 7 in each of 2018, 2023 and 2028.cash equivalents.
    
The instruments governing our outstanding indebtedness contain covenants that limit our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur debt; (ii) make certain dividends, distributions and investments; (iii) enter into certain transactions; and/or (iv) merge, consolidate or sell certain assets. Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes also require us and our subsidiaries to maintain total unencumbered assets of at least 150% of our unsecured debt. Our credit facilities also require us to maintain certain financial covenants pertaining to, among other things, our consolidated total leverage, secured debt, unsecured debt, fixed charge coverage and net worth.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.


Derivatives and Hedging


In the normal course of our business, interest rate fluctuations affect future cash flows under our variable rate debt obligations, loans receivable and marketable debt securities, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our operating results. We follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative instruments, to mitigate the impact of these risks.


For interest rate exposures, we use derivatives primarily to fix the rate on our variable rate debt and to manage our borrowing costs. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, and we have a policy of entering into contracts only with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When considered together with the underlying exposure that the derivative is designed to hedge, we do not expect that the use of derivatives in this manner would have any material adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations.


As of December 31, 2017,2019, our variable rate debt obligations of $1.9$2.0 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $549.9$147.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from March 20182022 to January 2023May 2022 that effectively convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2017,2019, our fixed rate debt obligations of $9.4$10.3 billion reflect, in part, the effect of $250.9$505.1 million and C$119.8 million notional amount of interest rate swaps with maturities ranging from October 2018August 2020 to September 2027,December 2029, in each case that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.

In February 2016, we entered into a $200 million notional amount interest rate swap with a maturity of August 3, 2020 that effectively converts LIBOR-based floating rate debt to fixed rate debt, setting LIBOR at 1.132% through the maturity date of the swap.

In July 2016, we entered into $225 million notional forward starting swaps that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates between July and the September issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2026. On the issuance date, we realized a gain of $1.9 million from these swaps that is being recognized over the life of the notes using an effective interest method.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In January and February 2017, we entered into a total of $275 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of April 3, 2017 that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.33%. In March 2017, these swaps were terminated in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.850% senior notes due 2027, which resulted in a $0.8 million gain that is being recognized over the life of the notes using the effective interest method.

In March 2017, we entered into interest rate swaps totaling a notional amount of $400 million with a maturity of January 15, 2023, effectively converting fixed rate debt to three month LIBOR-based floating rate debt.  As a result, we will receive a fixed rate on the swap of 3.10% and will pay a floating rate equal to three month LIBOR plus a weighted average swap spread of 0.98%.

In June 2017, we entered into a total of $125 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of January 15, 2018 and a maturity of January 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.1832%.

In December 2017, we entered into a total of $75 million of notional forward starting swaps with an effective date of February 15, 2018 and a maturity of February 15, 2028, that reduced our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates related to changes in rates between the trade dates of the swaps and the forecasted issuance of long-term debt.  The rate on the notional amounts was locked at a weighted average rate of 2.3705%.

Unamortized Fair Value Adjustment

As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized fair value adjustment related to the long-term debt we assumed in connection with various acquisitions was $12.1 million and will be recognized as effective yield adjustments over the remaining terms of the instruments. The estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment related to long-term debt, which is reflected as a reduction of interest expense, was $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. For each of the next five years the estimated aggregate amortization of the fair value adjustment will be as follows:
 Estimated Aggregate Amortization
 (In thousands)
2018$2,821
20192,105
20201,664
20211,058
2022646







NOTE 11—FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments were as follows:
 As of December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2018
 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
 (In thousands)
Assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$106,363
 $106,363
 $72,277
 $72,277
Escrow deposits and restricted cash39,739
 39,739
 59,187
 59,187
Secured mortgage loans and other, net645,546
 646,925
 439,491
 425,290
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net63,724
 63,538
 54,164
 54,081
Marketable debt securities237,360
 237,360
 206,442
 206,442
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments, net59,066
 59,066
 56,378
 56,378
Derivative instruments738
 738
 6,012
 6,012
Liabilities:       
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross12,245,802
 12,778,758
 10,829,702
 10,617,074
Derivative instruments12,987
 12,987
 4,561
 4,561
Redeemable OP Units171,178
 171,178
 174,552
 174,552

 2017 2016
 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Amount
 Fair Value
 (In thousands)
Assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$81,355
 $81,355
 $286,707
 $286,707
Secured mortgage loans and other, net1,291,694
 1,286,322
 646,972
 655,981
Non-mortgage loans receivable, net59,857
 58,849
 52,544
 53,626
Government-sponsored pooled loan investments54,665
 54,665
 55,049
 55,049
Derivative instruments7,248
 7,248
 3,302
 3,302
Liabilities:       
Senior notes payable and other debt, gross11,365,633
 11,600,750
 11,190,914
 11,369,440
Derivative instruments5,435
 5,435
 2,316
 2,316
Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests146,252
 146,252
 177,177
 177,177
For a discussion of the assumptions considered, refer to “NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES.” The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the reported estimated fair value amounts. Accordingly, the estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we would realize in a current market exchange.



NOTE 12—STOCK- BASED COMPENSATION

Compensation Plans

We currently have: four4 plans under which outstanding options to purchase common stock, shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units have been, or may in the future be, granted to our officers, employees and non-employee directors (the 2000 Incentive Compensation Plan (Employee Plan), the 2006 Incentive Plan, the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, and the 2012 Incentive Plan); one1 plan under which executive officers may receive common stock in lieu of compensation (the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan); and one1 plan under which certain non-employee directors have received or may receive common stock in lieu of director fees (the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan). These plans are referred to collectively as the “Plans.”

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, we were permitted to issue shares and grant options, restricted stock and restricted stock units only under the Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, the Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan and the 2012 Incentive Plan. The 2006 Incentive Plan and the 2006 Stock Plan for Directors (collectively, the “2006 Plans”) expired on December 31, 2012, and no0 additional grants were permitted under those Plans after that date.

The number of shares initially reserved for issuance and the number of shares available for future grants or issuance under these Plans as of December 31, 20172019 were as follows:

Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to our executive officers in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their salary, at their option, and 0.6 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan—0.6 million shares were reserved initially for issuance to nonemployee directors in lieu of the payment of all or a portion of their retainer and meeting fees, at their option, and 0.50.4 million shares were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2019.

2012 Incentive Plan—10.5 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 2012 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were reserved initially for
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


grants or issuance to employees and non-employee directors, and 4.13.0 million shares (plus the number of shares or options outstanding under the 2006 Plans as of December 31, 20172019 that were or are subsequently forfeited or expire unexercised) were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2017.2019.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Outstanding options issued under the Plans are exercisable at the market price on the date of grant, expire ten years from the date of grant, and vest or have vested over periods of two or three years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of stock options may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas, Inc. and other specified events.
On January 18, 2017, the Executive Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of our Board of Directors approved a 2017 long-term incentive compensation program for our named executive officers (the “2017 LTIP”) pursuant to the 2012 Incentive Plan. Several changes were made covering 2017, including: (1) in prior years, long-term incentive compensation awards were granted following and based on the satisfaction of specified performance goals (i.e., “retrospective”), and in 2017, performance-based awards made pursuant to the 2017 LTIP generally will be earned at a higher or lower level based on future performance (i.e., “prospective”); and (2) certain transition awards and modified vesting provisions apply. Under the 2017 LTIP, the aggregate target award value for each named executive officer is allocated such that 60% of the value is performance-based, in the form of performance-based restricted stock units, and 40% of the value is in the form of time-based restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee eliminated qualitative or discretionary goals from the 2017 LTIP, which previously comprised 50% of the award opportunity.


Stock Options
In determining the estimated fair value of our stock options as of the date of grant, we used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

 2017 2016 2015
Risk-free interest rate1.69-1.87%
 0.93-1.27%
 1.02 - 1.38%
Dividend yield6.00% 5.50% 5.00%
Volatility factors of the expected market price for our common stock21.5-21.6%
 19.1-20.6%
 19.0 - 20.0%
Weighted average expected life of options4.0 years
 4.0 years
 4.0 years
The following is a summary of stock option activity in 2017:2019:
 Shares (000’s) 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding as of December 31, 20184,783
 $59.20
    
Options granted
 
    
Options exercised(700) 51.68
    
Options forfeited(6) 60.50
    
Options expired
 
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 20194,077
 60.49
 5.7 $7,379
Exercisable as of December 31, 20194,014
 60.49
 5.7 $7,415

 Shares (000’s) 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Intrinsic
Value
($000’s)
Outstanding as of December 31, 20163,805
 $56.05
    
Options granted1,626
 61.93
    
Options exercised(349) 46.70
    
Options forfeited(57) 58.87
    
Outstanding as of December 31, 20175,025
 58.57
 7.2 $19,522
Exercisable as of December 31, 20173,407
 $57.01
 6.5 $18,602

Compensation costs for all share-based awards are based on the grant date fair value and are recognized on a straight-line basis during the requisite service periods, with charges recorded in general, administrative and administrative expenses.professional fees. Compensation costs related to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016were $0.3 million, $2.6 million and 2015 were $4.8$4.8 million,, $6.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, we had $2.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.20 years.
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options issued during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $5.23, $4.73 and $5.89, respectively.
Aggregate proceeds received from options exercised under the Plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 were $16.3$36.1 million, $20.4$8.8 million and $6.4$16.3 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value at exercise of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 was $7.0$12.3 million, $8.0$3.1 million and $4.7$7.0 million, respectively. There was no0 deferred income tax benefit for stock options exercised.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units


We recognize the fair value of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units on the grant date of the award as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, with charges to general, administrative and administrative expensesprofessional fees of $21.7$33.6 million,, $14.7 $27.3 million and $15.2$21.7 million in 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. Restricted stock and restricted stock units generally vest over periods ranging from two to five years. If provided in the applicable Plan or award agreement, the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units may accelerate upon a change of control (as defined in the applicable Plan) of Ventas and other specified events.
    
A summary of the status of our non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, including performance-based awards, as of December 31, 2017,2019, and changes during the year ended December 31, 20172019 follows:
 
Restricted
Stock
(000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Restricted
Stock Units (000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2018276
 $53.64
 628
 $57.70
Granted143
 62.69
 304
 59.85
Vested(149) 54.20
 (371) 60.73
Forfeited(22) 57.24
 (22) 53.69
Nonvested at December 31, 2019248
 58.21
 539
 56.99

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 
Restricted
Stock
(000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Restricted
Stock Units (000’s)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2016312
 $57.29
 15
 $58.70
Granted283
 59.99
 409
 62.07
Vested(258) 58.82
 (10) 59.59
Forfeited(18) 58.95
 
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2017319
 $58.36
 414
 $62.01

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had $22.5$15.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Plans. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 1.541.66 years. The total fair value at the vesting date for restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016was $31.6 million, $15.5 million and 2015 was $16.6 million, $13.9 million and $18.3 million, respectively.


Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan


We have in effect an Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) under which our employees and directors may purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, on each purchase date, participants may purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than 90% of the market price on that date (with respect to the employee tax-favored portion of the plan) and not less than 95% of the market price on that date (with respect to the additional employee and director portion of the plan). We initially reserved 3.0 million shares for issuance under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2017,2019, 0.1 million shares had been purchased under the ESPP and 2.9 million shares were available for future issuance.

Employee Benefit Plan
    
We maintain a 401(k) plan that allows eligible employees to defer compensation subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. In 2017,2019, we made contributions for each qualifying employee of up to 3.5% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations. During 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, our aggregate contributions were approximately $1.4$1.5 million, $1.3$1.5 million and $1.2$1.4 million, respectively.


NOTE 13—INCOME TAXES


We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the applicable provisions of the Code, as amended, for every year beginning with the year ended December 31, 1999. We have also elected for certain of our subsidiaries to be treated as TRS entities, which are subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes. All entities other than the TRS entities are collectively referred to as the “REIT” within this Note.note. Certain REIT entities are subject to foreign income tax.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Although we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to qualify as a REIT, such qualification depends upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various distribution, stock ownership and other tests. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, ourOur tax treatment of distributions per common share was as follows:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Tax treatment of distributions:     
Ordinary income$
 $
 $1.02814
Qualified ordinary income0.12230
 0.00375
 0.00337
199A qualified business income2.22898
 2.97465
 
Long-term capital gain
 0.05916
 1.07836
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain0.03434
 0.12244
 0.21513
Non-dividend distribution0.78438
 
 
Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes3.17000
 3.16000
 2.32500
Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year0.79250
 0.79250
 0.79000
Less: Dividend declared in prior year and taxable in current year(0.79250) (0.79000) 
Distribution declared per common share outstanding$3.17000
 $3.16250
 $3.11500


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 2017 2016 2015
Tax treatment of distributions:     
Ordinary income$1.02814
 $2.68216
 $3.02368
Qualified ordinary income0.00337
 0.05794
 0.01632
Long-term capital gain1.07836
 0.11613
 
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain0.21513
 0.10877
 
Distribution reported for 1099-DIV purposes$2.32500
 $2.96500
 $3.04000
Add: Dividend declared in current year and taxable in following year0.79000
 
 
Distribution declared per common share outstanding$3.11500
 $2.96500
 $3.04000


We believe we have met the annual REIT distribution requirement by payment of at least 90% of our estimated taxable income for 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. Our consolidated benefit for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Current - Federal$(1,840) $(2,953) $(5,672)
Current - State2,118
 1,332
 1,119
Deferred - Federal(49,532) (32,492) (54,396)
Deferred - State(3,353) (825) 3,237
Current - Foreign2,335
 1,892
 2,307
Deferred - Foreign(6,038) (6,907) (6,394)
Total$(56,310) $(39,953) $(59,799)

 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Current - Federal$(5,672) $(2,991) $138
Current - State1,119
 1,241
 1,453
Deferred - Federal(54,396) (19,539) (25,962)
Deferred - State3,237
 (3,634) (3,054)
Current - Foreign2,307
 1,067
 953
Deferred - Foreign(6,394) (7,487) (12,812)
Total$(59,799) $(31,343) $(39,284)


The 2019 income tax benefit is primarily due to the $57.7 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. During the second quarter of 2019, we concluded it was “more-likely than-not” that these deferred tax assets (primarily US federal NOL carryforwards which begin to expire in 2031) would be realized. This conclusion was based on recently sustained profitability and recent upward revisions to estimates of future taxable income for these TRS entities. The 2018 income tax benefit is primarily due to the reversal of a $23.2 million valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards and tax losses of certain TRS entities. The $23.2 million valuation allowance reversal was an adjustment to the provisional amount recorded in the prior year related to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”) and was made based upon additional guidance issued by the IRS subsequent to enactment of the 2017 Tax Act. The 2017 income tax benefit is primarily due to accounting for the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”), specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish athe valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards (subsequently reversed in 2018), losses of certain TRS entities and the release of a tax reserve. The 2016 income tax benefit was due primarily to losses of certain TRS entities, the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the release of a tax reserve.

Although the TRS entities and certain other foreign entities have paid minimal cash federal, state and foreign income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, their federal income tax liabilities may increase in future years as we exhaust net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and as our senior living and other business segmentsoperations grow. Such increases could be significant.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit, which is computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, to the income tax benefit is as follows:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes$77,803
 $80,811
 $204,742
State income taxes, net of federal benefit2,341
 (253) (1,115)
Change in valuation allowance from ordinary operations(47,227) (5,451) 8,237
Decrease in ASC 740 income tax liability
 (4,347) (4,750)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes(90,862) (89,947) (231,379)
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes1,407
 1,924
 6,407
Change in tax status of TRS(52) 359
 (690)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act
 (23,160) (41,212)
Other differences280
 111
 (39)
Income tax benefit$(56,310) $(39,953) $(59,799)
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings from continuing operations before unconsolidated entities, noncontrolling interest and income taxes$204,742
 $181,478
 $123,086
State income taxes, net of federal benefit(1,115) (1,022) (657)
Increase in valuation allowance from ordinary operations8,237
 3,921
 20,978
Decrease in ASC 740 income tax liability(4,750) (3,582) (462)
Tax at statutory rate on earnings not subject to federal income taxes(231,379) (209,204) (185,648)
Foreign rate differential and foreign taxes6,407
 2,094
 3,095
Change in tax status of TRS(690) (5,629) 
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(41,212) 
 
Other differences(39) 601
 324
Income tax benefit$(59,799) $(31,343) $(39,284)

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Act was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code.  The changes to existing U.S. tax laws as a result of the 2017 Tax Act, which we believe have the most significant impact on the Company’s federal income taxes are as follows:

The 2017 Tax Act reduces the corporate tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate. We have recorded a decrease related to TRS net deferred tax liabilities of $19.9 million and a decrease to the associated valuation allowances of $44.6 million, with a corresponding net adjustment to deferred income tax benefit of $64.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The 2017 Tax Act amended the interest expense limitation rules applicable to business entities. An election is available under the 2017 Tax Act to be excluded from the new interest limitation provision for “real property trade or businesses.” We have made a reasonable estimate that the new interest limitation rules may disallow the deferred interest carried forward under the rules prior to the 2017 Tax Act. Consequently, we have recorded a provisional adjustment of $23.3 million for the entire deferred tax asset related to the existing deferred interest carryforward. We will recognize any changes to provisional amounts as we continue to analyze the existing statute or as additional guidance becomes available. We expect to complete our analysis of the provisional amounts by the end of 2018.

The 2017 Tax Act requires a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The Company believes that no such tax will be due as there are no accumulated foreign earnings applicable to the mandatory deemed repatriation.

We did not identify items for which the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act have not been completed and a reasonable estimate could not be determined as of December 31, 2017. Our analysis of the 2017 Tax Act may be impacted by new legislation, the Congressional Joint Committee Staff, Treasury, or other guidance.  Based on the 2017 Tax Act as enacted, we do not believe there will be further material impacts to the financial statements related to the other 2017 Tax Act provisions but cannot assure you as to the outcome of this matter.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards included in the net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs$(257,373) $(269,758) $(300,395)
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards136,771
 133,243
 146,732
Expense accruals and other7,380
 11,910
 12,890
Valuation allowance(40,114) (80,614) (109,319)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(153,336) $(205,219) $(250,092)

 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Property, primarily differences in depreciation and amortization, the tax basis of land assets and the treatment of interests and certain costs$(300,395) $(409,803) $(413,566)
Operating loss and interest deduction carryforwards146,732
 195,415
 180,575
Expense accruals and other12,890
 18,185
 14,624
Valuation allowance(109,319) (120,438) (120,015)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(250,092) $(316,641) $(338,382)


We established beginning net deferred tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (primarily property, intangible and related assets, net of NOL carryforwards), for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, in connection with the following acquisitions:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Research and innovation acquisition$
 $
 $19,262
Miscellaneous acquisitions
 (922) (4,510)
Established beginning deferred tax assets or liabilities$
 $(922) $14,752

 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
2015 HCT acquisition$
 $
 $(32,336)
2015 UK acquisition
 
 (18,569)
2016 Life Sciences Acquisition19,262
 (9,446) 
2017 miscellaneous acquisitions(4,510) 
 
Established beginning deferred tax assets or liabilities$14,752
 $(9,446) $(50,905)


Our net deferred tax liability decreased $51.9 million during 2019 primarily due to the $57.7 million reversal of valuation allowances recorded against the net deferred tax assets of certain of our TRS entities. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $44.8 million during 2018 primarily due to accounting for IRS guidance issued subsequent to the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act, specifically a $23.2 million benefit for the reversal of a valuation allowance on deferred interest carryforwards, and tax losses of certain TRS entities. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $66.5 million during 2017 primarily due to accounting for the 2017 Tax Act, specifically a $64.5 million benefit from the reduced U.S. federal corporate tax rate on net deferred tax liabilities and an offsetting expense of $23.3 million to establish a provisional adjustment on deferred interest carryforwards, the impact of TRS operating losses, currency translation adjustments, and purchase accounting adjustments. Our net deferred tax liability decreased $21.7 million during 2016 primarily due to the reversal of a net deferred tax liability at one TRS and the impact of TRS operating losses and currency translation adjustments, offset by $9.4 million of recorded deferred tax liability as a result of the Life Sciences Acquisition.


Due to uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets, we have established valuation allowances, primarily in connection with the NOL carryforwards related to certain TRSs.  The amounts related to NOLs at the TRS entities for 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016,are $21.2 million, $55.1 million and 2015 are $67.1 million, $84.7 million and $85.5 million, respectively.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


A rollforward of valuation allowances, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Beginning Balance$120,438
 $120,015
 $97,550
Additions:     
Purchase accounting
 
 1,002
Expenses(1)
9,277
 6,589
 21,375
Subtractions:     
Deductions(1)
(1,040) (2,668) (397)
Effect of the 2017 Tax Act(21,321) 
 
State income tax, net of federal impact956
 536
 529
Other activity (not resulting in expense or deduction)1,009
 (4,034) (44)
Ending balance$109,319
 $120,438
 $120,015

(1)
Generally, Expenses and Deductions are increases and decreases, respectively, in TRS valuation allowances, the latter being through utilization or release. The net amount equals the increase in valuation allowance on the reconciliation of income tax expense and benefit schedule above.

We are subject to corporate level taxes (“built-in gains tax”) for any asset dispositions during the five-year period immediately after the assets were owned by a C corporation (either prior to our REIT election, through stock acquisition or merger). The amount of income potentially subject to built-in gains tax is generally equal to the lesser of the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a REIT asset or the actual amount of gain. Some, but not all, future gains could be offset by available NOL carryforwards.


At December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, the REIT had NOL carryforwards of $625.8$858.6 million, $1.1 billion$910.7 million and $1.1 billion,$973.4 million, respectively. Additionally, the REIT has $14.4$12.6 million of federal income tax credits that were carried over from acquisitions. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income (and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed), if any. The REIT will be entitled to utilize NOLs and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that REIT taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid. Certain NOL and credit carryforwards are limited as to their utilization by Section 382 of the Code. The remaining REIT carryforwards begin to expire in 2024.2020.


For the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the net difference between tax bases and the reported amount of REIT assets and liabilities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $4.1$3.5 billion and $4.4$3.8 billion, respectively, less than the book bases of those assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.


Generally, we are subject to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 20142016 and subsequent years and are subject to audit by state taxing authorities for the year ended December 31, 20132015 and subsequent years. We are subject to audit generally under the statutes of limitation by the Canada
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Revenue Agency and provincial authorities with respect to the Canadian entities for the year ended December 31, 20132015 and subsequent years. We are also subject to audit in Canada for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and certain prior periods, with respect to entities acquired in 2014 from Holiday Retirement. We are subject to audit in the United Kingdom generally for the periods ended in and subsequent to 2016.2018.


The following table summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits:
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Balance as of January 1$12,344
 $16,765
Additions to tax positions related to prior years178
 207
Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years(395) (1,720)
Subtractions to tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations
 (2,908)
Balance as of December 31$12,127
 $12,344

 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Balance as of January 1$20,950
 $24,135
Additions to tax positions related to prior years648
 222
Subtractions to tax positions related to prior years(497) 
Subtractions to tax positions as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations(4,336) (3,407)
Balance as of December 31$16,765
 $20,950

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Included in these unrecognized tax benefits of $16.8$12.1 million and $21.0$12.3 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, were $15.0$10.7 million and $19.3$10.6 million of tax benefits at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, that, if recognized, would reduce our annual effective tax rate. We accrued 0 interest of $0.2 millionor penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits during 2017, but no penalties.2019. We do not expect our unrecognized tax benefits to increase or decrease by $2.6 million during 2018, as a result of the lapse of the statute of limitations.materially in 2020.


As a part of the transfer pricing structure in the normal course of business, the REIT enters into transactions with certain TRSs, such as leasing transactions, other capital financing and allocation of general and administrative costs, which transactions are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authority transfer pricing rules.


Subsequent Event

In the first quarter of 2020, we completed an internal restructuring of certain US taxable REIT subsidiaries.  As a result, we expect to record a $152 million tax benefit from the transfer of assets subject to certain deferred tax liabilities from taxable REIT subsidiaries to the REIT in this tax-free transaction.


NOTE 14—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Proceedings against Tenants, Operators and Managers


From time to time, Atria, Sunrise, Brookdale Senior Living, Ardent, Kindred and our other tenants, operators and managers are parties to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims arising in the conduct of their business and operations. Even though we generally are not party to these proceedings, the unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially adversely affect such tenants’, operators’ or managers’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Proceedings Indemnified and Defended by Third Parties


From time to time, we are party to certain legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims for which third parties are contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless. The tenants of our triple-net leased properties and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of their leases and other agreements with us to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims arising in the course of their business and related to the operations of our triple-net leased properties. In addition, third parties from whom we acquired certain of our assets and, in some cases, their affiliates are required by the terms of the related conveyance documents to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against certain actions, investigations and claims related to the acquired assets and arising prior to our ownership or related to excluded assets and liabilities. In some cases, a portion of the purchase price consideration is held in escrow for a specified period of time as collateral for these indemnification obligations. We are presently being defended by certain tenants and other obligated third parties in these types of matters. We cannot assure you that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will continue to defend us in these matters, that our tenants, their affiliates or other obligated third parties will have sufficient assets, income and access to financing to enable them to satisfy their defense and indemnification obligations to us or that any purchase price consideration held in escrow will be sufficient to satisfy claims for which we are entitled to indemnification. The unfavorable resolution of any such actions, investigations or claims could, individually or in the aggregate, materially
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


adversely affect our tenants’ or other obligated third parties’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations and their ability to satisfy their respective obligations to us, which, in turn, could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Proceedings Arising in Connection with Senior Living and Office Operations; Other Litigation


From time to time, we are party to various legal actions, regulatory investigations and claims (some of which may not be insured and some of which may allege large damage amounts) arising in connection with our senior living and office operations or otherwise in the course of our business. In limited circumstances, the manager of the applicable seniors housing community, MOB or life scienceresearch and innovation center may be contractually obligated to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless against such actions, investigations and claims. It is the opinion of management that, except as otherwise set forth in this Note 14,note, that the disposition of any such actions, investigations and claims that are currently pending will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on us. However, regardless of their merits, we may be forced to expend significant financial resources to defend and resolve these matters. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, investigations and claims, and if management’s assessment of our liability with respect thereto is incorrect, such actions, investigations and claims could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


Certain Obligations, Liabilities and Litigation


We may be subject to various obligations, liabilities and litigation assumed in connection with or arising out of our acquisitions or otherwise arising in connection with our business, some of which may be indemnifiable by third parties. If these liabilities are greater than expected or were not known to us at the time of acquisition, if we are not entitled to indemnification,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


or if the responsible third party fails to indemnify us, such obligations, liabilities and litigation could have a Material Adverse Effect on us. In addition, in connection with the sale or leasing of our properties, we may incur various obligations and liabilities, including indemnification obligations to the buyer or tenant, relating to the operations of those properties, which could have a Material Adverse Effect on us.


OtherOperating Leases


With respectWe lease real property, primarily land and corporate office space, and equipment, primarily vehicles at our seniors housing communities. At inception, we establish an operating lease asset and operating lease liability calculated as the present value of future minimum lease payments. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use a discount rate that approximates our incremental borrowing rate available at lease commencement to certaindetermine the present value. Incremental borrowing rates are adjusted for the length of the individual lease term. The weighted average discount rate and remaining lease term of our properties, we are subject to operating and ground lease obligations that generally require fixed monthly or annual rent payments and may include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases have terms that expire during the next 84 years, excluding extension options.

Asas of December 31, 2017,2019 are 7.25% and 41.8 years, respectively. Operating lease assets and liabilities are not recognized for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less.

Our lease expense primarily consists of ground and corporate office leases. Ground lease expense is included in interest expense and corporate office lease expense is included in general, administrative and professional fees in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 we recognized $32.6 million and $32.3 million of expense relating to our leases. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, cash paid for leases was $25.8 million and $26.7 million, respectively as reported within operating cash outflows in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.    
The following table summarizes future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable ground and other operating and ground leases were as follows:of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
2020$24,395
2021(1)
56,948
2022(1)
28,023
202319,322
202418,398
Thereafter644,996
Total undiscounted minimum lease payments792,082
Less: imputed interest(540,886)
Operating lease liabilities$251,196

 Lease Payments
 (In thousands)
2018$27,498
201923,953
202023,206
202122,651
202217,738
Thereafter623,462
Total$738,508

(1)
Obligations include payment of ground rent upon substantial completion of in progress research and innovation developments.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 15—EARNINGS PER SHARE


The following table shows the amounts used in computing our basic and diluted earnings per common share:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$439,297
 $415,991
 $1,361,222
Discontinued operations
 (10) (110)
Net income439,297
 415,981
 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests6,281
 6,514
 4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders          $433,016
 $409,467
 $1,356,470
Denominator:     
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares365,977
 356,265
 355,326
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Stock options391
 174
 494
Restricted stock awards527
 331
 265
OP unitholder interests2,991
 2,531
 2,481
Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares369,886
 359,301
 358,566
Basic earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$1.20
 $1.17
 $3.83
Net income attributable to common stockholders          1.18
 1.15
 3.82
Diluted earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$1.19
 $1.16
 $3.80
Net income attributable to common stockholders          1.17
 1.14 3.78

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$643,949
 $554,209
 $389,539
Discontinued operations(110) (922) 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 98,203
 18,580
Net income1,361,112
 651,490
 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests4,642
 2,259
 1,379
Net income attributable to common stockholders          $1,356,470
 $649,231
 $417,843
Denominator:     
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted average shares355,326
 344,703
 330,311
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Stock options494
 569
 360
Restricted stock awards265
 176
 41
OP Unitholder interests2,481
 2,942
 3,295
Denominator for diluted earnings per share—adjusted weighted average shares358,566
 348,390
 334,007
Basic earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$1.81
 $1.61
 $1.18
Net income attributable to common stockholders          3.82
 1.88
 1.26
Diluted earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations$1.80
 $1.59
 $1.17
Net income attributable to common stockholders          3.78
 1.86 1.25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




There were 3.01.1 million, 1.43.5 million and 0.93.0 million anti-dilutive options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.



NOTE 16—PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EQUITY


Capital Stock


From time to time, we may sell up to an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our common stock under an “at-the-market” equity offering program (“ATM program”). During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 2.7 million shares of our common stock under our ATM program for gross proceeds of $66.75 per share. As of December 31, 2019, $822.1 million of our common stock remained available for sale under our ATM program.

In June 2019, we sold 12.7 million shares of our common stock under a registered public offering for gross proceeds of $62.75 per share. We used the majority of the net proceeds to fund our LGM Acquisition. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” and “NOTE 6—LOANS RECEIVABLE AND INVESTMENTS” for additional information regarding the LGM Acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we sold 0 shares of common stock under our ATM program.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued and sold 1.1 million shares of common stock under our “at-the-market” (“ATM”) equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $73.9 million, after sales agent commissions. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $155.6 million of our common stock remained available for sale under ourprevious ATM equity offering program.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we issued and sold a total of 18.9 million shares of our common stock under our ATM equity offering program and public offerings. Aggregate net proceeds for these activities were $1.3 billion, after sales agent commissions. We used the proceeds to fund a portion of the Life Sciences Acquisition, for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY” for additional information.

In January 2015, in connection with the HCT acquisition, we issued approximately 28.4 million shares of our common stock and 1.1 million Class C Units that were redeemable for our common stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we issued and sold a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock under our ATM equity offering program for aggregate net proceeds of $491.6 million, after sales agent commissions.


Excess Share Provision


In order to preserve our ability to maintain REIT status, our Charter provides that if a person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 9% of our outstanding common stock or 9.9% of our outstanding preferred stock, the shares that are
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


beneficially owned in excess of such limit are deemed to be excess shares. These shares are automatically deemed transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable institution or other qualifying organization selected by our Board of Directors. The trust is entitled to all dividends with respect to the shares and the trustee may exercise all voting power over the shares.


We have the right to buy the excess shares for a purchase price equal to the lesser of the price per share in the transaction that created the excess shares or the market price on the date we buy the shares, and we may defer payment of the purchase price for the excess shares for up to five years. If we do not purchase the excess shares, the trustee of the trust is required to transfer the excess shares at the direction of the Board of Directors. The owner of the excess shares is entitled to receive the lesser of the proceeds from the sale or the original purchase price for such excess shares, and any additional amounts are payable to the beneficiary of the trust. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were no0 shares in the trust.


Our Board of Directors is empowered to grant waivers from the excess share provisions of our Charter.


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss


The following is a summary of our accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:loss:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (In thousands)
Foreign currency translation$(51,743) $(55,016)
Available for sale securities27,380
 15,746
Derivative instruments(10,201) 19,688
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(34,564) $(19,582)

 2017 2016
 (In thousands)
Foreign currency translation$(45,580) $(66,192)
Accumulated unrealized gain on government-sponsored pooled loan investments802
 1,239
Other9,658
 7,419
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(35,120) $(57,534)

The change in foreign currency translation during the year ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to the remeasurement of our properties located in the United Kingdom.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)



Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests


The following is a rollforward of our redeemable OP Unitholder Interestsunitholder and noncontrolling interests for 2017:2019:
  Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Total Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
  (In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2018 $174,552
 $13,589
 $188,141
New issuances (1)
 
 81,181
 81,181
Change in valuation 7,389
 7,730
 15,119
Distributions and other (9,298) 
 (9,298)
Redemptions (1,465) 
 (1,465)
Balance as of December 31, 2019 $171,178
 $102,500
 $273,678

  Redeemable OP Unitholder Interests Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests Total Redeemable OP Unitholder and Noncontrolling Interests
  (In thousands)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $177,177
 $23,551
 $200,728
New issuances 
 2,143
 2,143
Change in valuation (2,112) 2,353
 241
Distributions and other (5,677) 
 (5,677)
Redemptions (23,136) (15,809) (38,945)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 $146,252
 $12,238
 $158,490

(1)
Includes the redeemable portion of LGM's interest in certain seniors housing communities acquired in September 2019.
During 2017, third party investors redeemed 53,728 OP Units and 341,776 Class C Units for 390,403 shares of Ventas common stock, valued at $24.0 million.



NOTE 17—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


As disclosed in “NOTE 3—CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK,” Atria provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to our seniors housing communities that Atria operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to long-term management agreements.  Most of our management agreements with Atria have initial terms expiring either July 31, 2024 or December 31, 2027, with successive automatic ten-year renewal periods. The management fees payable to Atria under most of the Atria management agreements range from 4.5% to 5% of revenues generated by the applicable properties, and Atria can earn up to an additional 1% of revenues based on the achievement of specified performance targets. Atria also provides certain construction and development management services relating to various development and redevelopment projects within our seniors housing portfolio.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we incurred fees to Atria of $59.7$62.1 million, $58.7$60.1 million and $58.0$59.7 million respectively, the majority of which are recorded within property-level operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.


Our 34% ownership interest in Atria entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint 2 of 6 members on the Atria Board of Directors.

As disclosed in “NOTE 4—ACQUISITIONS OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTY,”of December 31, 2019, we leased 10 hospital campuses to Ardent pursuant to a single, triple-net master lease agreement. Pursuant to our master lease agreement, Ardent is obligated to pay base rent, which escalates annually by the lesser of four times the increase in the consumer price index for the relevant period and 2.5%.  The initial term of the master lease expires on August 31, 2035 and Ardent has one ten-year renewal option. For the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016, and the period from the closing of the Ardent Transaction through December 31, 2015,2017, we recognized rental income from Ardent of $118.8 million, $114.8 million and $110.8 million, $106.9respectively, relating to the Ardent master lease.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Our 9.8% ownership interest in Ardent entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint 1 of 11 members on the Ardent Board of Directors.
In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to ESL. These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”) under triple-net leases, are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us and are included in the senior living operations reportable business segment. Upon termination of our lease with Elmcroft, we derecognized our accumulated straight-line receivable balance and offsetting reserve of $75.2 million. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred $8.2 million and $42.9$23.6 million respectively. In 2015, as partrespectively of the closing, we also paid certain transaction-related feestransaction and integration costs relating to Ardentthis transaction, net of $40.0 million, which are recorded withinproperty-level net assets assumed for 0 consideration, included in merger-related expenses and deal costs in our Consolidated Statements of Income.


These transactionsIn January 2018, we acquired a 34% ownership interest in ESL which entitles us to customary rights and minority protections, as well as the right to appoint 2 of 6 members to the ESL Board of Directors. ESL management owns the 66% controlling interest.

ESL provides comprehensive property management and accounting services with respect to our seniors housing communities that ESL operates, for which we pay annual management fees pursuant to a management agreement.  For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we incurred fees to ESL of $14.6 million and $12.9 million, respectively, the majority of which are considered to be arm’s lengthrecorded within property-level operating expenses in nature and on terms consistent with transactions with unaffiliated third parties.our Consolidated Statements of Income.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 18—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)


Summarized unaudited consolidated quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is provided below.below:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$942,874
 $950,717
 $983,155
 $996,004
        
Income from continuing operations$127,588
 $211,898
 $86,918
 $12,893
Net income127,588
 211,898
 86,918
 12,893
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,803
 1,369
 1,659
 1,450
Net income attributable to common stockholders          $125,785
 $210,529
 $85,259
 $11,443
Basic earnings per share: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.36
 $0.59
 $0.23
 $0.03
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.35
 0.58
 0.23
 0.03
Diluted earnings per share: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.35
 $0.58
 $0.23
 $0.03
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.35
 0.58
 0.23
 0.03
        
Dividends declared per common share$0.7925
 $0.7925
 $0.7925
 $0.7925
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$883,443
 $895,490
 $899,928
 $895,288
        
Income from continuing operations$155,912
 $152,272
 $156,930
 $178,835
Discontinued operations(53) (23) (19) (15)
Gain on real estate dispositions43,289
 719
 458,280
 214,985
Net income199,148
 152,968
 615,191
 393,805
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,021
 1,137
 1,233
 1,251
Net income attributable to common stockholders          $198,127
 $151,831
 $613,958
 $392,554
Earnings per share: 
  
  
  
Basic: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.44
 $0.43
 $0.44
 $0.50
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.56
 0.43
 1.72
 1.10
Diluted: 
  
  
  
Income from continuing operations$0.44
 $0.42
 $0.44
 $0.50
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.55
 0.42
 1.71
 1.09
        
Dividends declared per share$0.775
 $0.775
 $0.775
 $0.79
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$852,289
 $848,404
 $867,116
 $875,713
        
Income from continuing operations$123,339
 $137,849
 $150,446
 $142,575
Discontinued operations(489) (148) (118) (167)
Gain (loss) on real estate dispositions26,184
 5,739
 (144) 66,424
Net income149,034
 143,440
 150,184
 208,832
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests54
 278
 732
 1,195
  Net income attributable to common stockholders          $148,980
 $143,162
 $149,452
 $207,637
Earnings per share:       
Basic:       
Income from continuing operations$0.37
 $0.41
 $0.43
 $0.40
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.44
 0.42
 0.43
 0.59
Diluted:       
Income from continuing operations$0.36
 $0.40
 $0.42
 $0.40
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.44
 0.42
 0.42
 0.58
        
Dividends declared per share$0.73
 $0.73
 $0.73
 $0.775

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues$943,705
 $942,304
 $936,538
 $923,263
        
Income from continuing operations$80,108
 $169,300
 $103,281
 $63,302
Discontinued operations(10) 
 
 
Net income80,098
 169,300
 103,281
 63,302
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests1,395
 2,781
 1,309
 1,029
  Net income attributable to common stockholders          $78,703
 $166,519
 $101,972
 $62,273
Basic earnings per share:       
Income from continuing operations$0.22
 $0.48
 $0.29
 $0.18
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.22
 0.47
 0.29
 0.17
Diluted earnings per share:       
Income from continuing operations$0.22
 $0.47
 $0.29
 $0.18
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.22
 0.46
 0.28
 0.17
        
Dividends declared per common share$0.79
 $0.79
 $0.79
 $0.7925


NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we operated through three3 reportable business segments: triple-net leased properties, senior living operations and office operations. UnderIn our triple-net leased properties segment, we invest in and own seniors housing and healthcare properties throughout the United States and the United Kingdom and lease those properties to healthcare operating companies under “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases that obligate the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. In our senior living operations segment, we invest in seniors housing communities throughout the United States and Canada and engage independent operators, such as Atria and Sunrise, to manage those communities. In our office operations segment, we primarily acquire, own, develop, lease and manage MOBs and life scienceresearch and innovation centers throughout the United States. Information provided for “all other” includes income from loans and investments and other miscellaneous income and various corporate-level expenses not directly attributable to any of our three3 reportable business segments. Assets included in “all other” consist primarily of corporate assets, including cash, restricted cash, loans receivable and investments, and miscellaneous accounts receivable.

Our chief operating decision makers evaluate performance of the combined properties in each reportable business segment and determine how to allocate resources to those segments, in significant part, based on segment NOI and related measures. We define segment NOI as total revenues, less interest and other income, property-level operating expenses and office building services costs. We consider segment NOI useful because it allows investors, analysts and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies between periods on a consistent basis. In order to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical consolidated operating results, segment NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income from continuing operationsattributable to common stockholders as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and professional fees, income tax expense and other non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual reportable business segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. There are no0 intersegment sales or transfers.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Summary information by reportable business segment is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Revenues:                  
Rental income$840,131
 $
 $753,467
 $
 $1,593,598
$780,898
 $
 $828,978
 $
 $1,609,876
Resident fees and services
 1,843,232
 
 
 1,843,232

 2,151,533
 
 
 2,151,533
Office building and other services revenue4,580
 
 7,497
 1,600
 13,677

 
 7,747
 3,409
 11,156
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 117,608
 117,608

 
 
 89,201
 89,201
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034

 
 
 10,984
 10,984
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
$780,898
 $2,151,533
 $836,725
 $103,594
 $3,872,750
                  
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
$780,898
 $2,151,533
 $836,725
 $103,594
 $3,872,750
Less:                  
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034

 
 
 10,984
 10,984
Property-level operating expenses
 1,250,065
 233,007
 
 1,483,072
26,561
 1,521,398
 260,249
 
 1,808,208
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391

 
 2,319
 
 2,319
Segment NOI844,711
 593,167
 524,566
 119,208
 2,081,652
$754,337
 $630,135
 $574,157
 $92,610
 2,051,239
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities845
 (61) 503
 (1,848) (561)
Segment profit$845,556
 $593,106
 $525,069
 $117,360
 2,081,091
Interest and other income 
  
  
   6,034
 
  
  
   10,984
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (448,196) 
  
  
  
 (451,662)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (887,948) 
  
  
  
 (1,045,620)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (135,490) 
  
  
  
 (165,996)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net 
  
  
  
 (754) 
  
  
  
 (41,900)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (10,535) 
  
  
  
 (15,235)
Other 
  
  
  
 (20,052) 
  
  
  
 17,609
Loss from unconsolidated entities        (2,454)
Gain on real estate dispositions        26,022
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 59,799
 
  
  
  
 56,310
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $643,949
 
  
  
  
 439,297
Discontinued operations        
Net income        439,297
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests        6,281
Net income attributable to common stockholders        $433,016
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




For the Year Ended December 31, 2016For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Revenues:                  
Rental income$845,834
 $
 $630,342
 $
 $1,476,176
$737,796
 $
 $776,011
 $
 $1,513,807
Resident fees and services
 1,847,306
 
 
 1,847,306

 2,069,477
 
 
 2,069,477
Office building and other services revenue4,921
 
 13,029
 3,120
 21,070
2,522
 
 7,592
 3,302
 13,416
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 98,094
 98,094

 
 
 124,218
 124,218
Interest and other income
 
 
 876
 876

 
 
 24,892
 24,892
Total revenues$850,755
 $1,847,306
 $643,371
 $102,090
 $3,443,522
$740,318
 $2,069,477
 $783,603
 $152,412
 $3,745,810
                  
Total revenues$850,755
 $1,847,306
 $643,371
 $102,090
 $3,443,522
$740,318
 $2,069,477
 $783,603
 $152,412
 $3,745,810
Less:                  
Interest and other income
 
 
 876
 876

 
 
 24,892
 24,892
Property-level operating expenses
 1,242,978
 191,784
 
 1,434,762

 1,446,201
 243,679
 
 1,689,880
Office building services costs
 
 7,311
 
 7,311

 
 1,418
 
 1,418
Segment NOI850,755
 604,328
 444,276
 101,214
 2,000,573
$740,318
 $623,276
 $538,506
 $127,520
 2,029,620
Income from unconsolidated entities2,363
 1,265
 590
 140
 4,358
Segment profit$853,118
 $605,593
 $444,866
 $101,354
 2,004,931
Interest and other income 
  
  
   876
 
  
  
   24,892
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (419,740) 
  
  
  
 (442,497)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (898,924) 
  
  
  
 (919,639)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (126,875) 
  
  
  
 (151,982)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net 
  
  
  
 (2,779) 
  
  
  
 (58,254)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (24,635) 
  
  
  
 (30,547)
Other 
  
  
  
 (9,988) 
  
  
  
 (66,768)
Loss from unconsolidated entities        (55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositions        46,247
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 31,343
 
  
  
  
 39,953
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $554,209
 
  
  
  
 415,991
Discontinued operations        (10)
Net income        415,981
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests        6,514
Net income attributable to common stockholders        $409,467
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:         
Rental income$840,131
 $
 $753,467
 $
 $1,593,598
Resident fees and services
 1,843,232
 
 
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenue4,580
 
 7,497
 1,600
 13,677
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 117,608
 117,608
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
          
Total revenues$844,711
 $1,843,232
 $760,964
 $125,242
 $3,574,149
Less:         
Interest and other income
 
 
 6,034
 6,034
Property-level operating expenses
 1,250,065
 233,007
 
 1,483,072
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391
Segment NOI$844,711
 $593,167
 $524,566
 $119,208
 2,081,652
Interest and other income 
  
  
   6,034
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (448,196)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (887,948)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (135,490)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net        (754)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (10,535)
Other 
  
  
  
 (20,052)
Loss from unconsolidated entities        (561)
Gain on real estate dispositions        717,273
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 59,799
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 1,361,222
Discontinued operations        (110)
Net income        1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests        4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders        $1,356,470

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Triple-Net
Leased
Properties
 
Senior
Living
Operations
 
Office
Operations
 
All
Other
 Total
 (In thousands)
Revenues:         
Rental income$779,801
 $
 $566,245
 $
 $1,346,046
Resident fees and services
 1,811,255
 
 
 1,811,255
Office building and other services revenue4,433
 
 34,436
 2,623
 41,492
Income from loans and investments
 
 
 86,553
 86,553
Interest and other income
 
 
 1,052
 1,052
Total revenues$784,234
 $1,811,255
 $600,681
 $90,228
 $3,286,398
          
Total revenues$784,234
 $1,811,255
 $600,681
 $90,228
 $3,286,398
Less:         
Interest and other income
 
 
 1,052
 1,052
Property-level operating expenses
 1,209,415
 174,225
 
 1,383,640
Office building services costs
 
 26,565
 
 26,565
Segment NOI784,234
 601,840
 399,891
 89,176
 1,875,141
(Loss) income from unconsolidated entities(813) (526) 369
 (450) (1,420)
Segment profit$783,421
 $601,314
 $400,260
 $88,726
 1,873,721
Interest and other income 
  
  
   1,052
Interest expense 
  
  
  
 (367,114)
Depreciation and amortization 
  
  
  
 (894,057)
General, administrative and professional fees 
  
  
  
 (128,035)
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net        (14,411)
Merger-related expenses and deal costs 
  
  
  
 (102,944)
Other 
  
  
  
 (17,957)
Income tax benefit 
  
  
  
 39,284
Income from continuing operations 
  
  
  
 $389,539
Assets by reportable business segment are as follows:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:       
Triple-net leased properties$6,381,657
 25.8% $6,795,142
 30.1%
Senior living operations10,142,023
 41.1
 8,156,187
 36.1
Office operations7,173,401
 29.1
 6,772,957
 30.0
All other assets995,127
 4.0
 860,269
 3.8
Total assets$24,692,208
 100.0% $22,584,555
 100.0%
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
 (Dollars in thousands)
Assets:       
Triple-net leased properties$7,778,064
 32.4% $7,627,792
 32.9%
Senior living operations7,654,609
 32.0
 7,826,262
 33.8
Office operations6,897,696
 28.8
 6,614,454
 28.6
All other assets1,624,172
 6.8
 1,098,092
 4.7
Total assets$23,954,541
 100.0% $23,166,600
 100.0%

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




Capital expenditures, including investments in real estate property and development project expenditures, by reportable business segment are as follows:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 (In thousands)
Capital expenditures:     
Triple-net leased properties$55,429
 $58,744
 $254,542
Senior living operations944,214
 337,750
 261,900
Office operations519,129
 332,147
 579,885
Total capital expenditures$1,518,772
 $728,641
 $1,096,327

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 (In thousands)
Capital expenditures:     
Triple-net leased properties$169,661
 $74,192
 $1,890,245
Senior living operations149,449
 105,614
 382,877
Office operations492,765
 1,503,304
 604,827
Total capital expenditures$811,875
 $1,683,110
 $2,877,949

Our portfolio of properties and mortgage loan and other investments are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Revenues are attributed to an individual country based on the location of each property. Geographic information regarding our operations is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Revenues:          
United States$3,361,682
 $3,242,353
 $3,086,449
$3,578,341
 $3,524,875
 $3,361,682
Canada186,049
 174,831
 173,778
266,946
 192,350
 186,049
United Kingdom26,418
 26,338
 26,171
27,463
 28,585
 26,418
Total revenues$3,574,149
 $3,443,522
 $3,286,398
$3,872,750
 $3,745,810
 $3,574,149
As of December 31,As of December 31,
2017 20162019 2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net real estate property:      
United States$19,219,650
 $19,105,939
$18,631,352
 $18,861,163
Canada1,070,903
 1,037,105
2,830,850
 963,588
United Kingdom297,827
 251,710
266,885
 268,906
Total net real estate property$20,588,380
 $20,394,754
$21,729,087
 $20,093,657




NOTE 20—CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING INFORMATION
Ventas, Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Realty, including the senior notes that were jointly issued with Ventas Capital Corporation. Ventas Capital Corporation is a direct 100% owned subsidiary of Ventas Realty that has no assets or operations, but was formed in 2002 solely to facilitate offerings of senior notes by a limited partnership. None of our other subsidiaries (such subsidiaries, excluding Ventas Realty and Ventas Capital Corporation, the “Ventas Subsidiaries”) is obligated with respect to Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes. Certain of Ventas Realty’s outstanding senior notes reflected in our condensed consolidating information were issued jointly with Ventas Capital Corporation.
Ventas, Inc. has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by our 100% owned subsidiary, Ventas Canada Finance Limited.Canada. None of our other subsidiaries is obligated with respect to Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s outstanding senior notes, all of which were issued on a private placement basis in Canada.
In connection with the NHP acquisition, our 100% owned subsidiary, NHP LLC, as successor to NHP, assumed the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the outstanding senior notes issued by NHP. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries (other than NHP LLC) is obligated with respect to any of NHP LLC’s outstanding senior notes.
Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, including those contained in the instruments governing our subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage indebtedness, may restrict our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries for the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


purpose of meeting our debt service obligations, including our payment guarantees with respect to Ventas Realty’s and Ventas Canada Finance Limited’sCanada’s senior notes.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The following summarizes our condensed consolidating information as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2015:2017:


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 As of December 31, 2019
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$14,714
 $108,533
 $22,355,474
 $
 $22,478,721
Cash and cash equivalents1,904
 
 104,459
 
 106,363
Escrow deposits and restricted cash1,205
 128
 38,406
 
 39,739
Investment in and advances to affiliates15,774,897
 2,728,110
 
 (18,503,007) 
Goodwill
 
 1,051,161
 
 1,051,161
Assets held for sale
 
 91,433
 
 91,433
Deferred income tax assets, net
 
 47,495
 
 47,495
Other assets83,190
 1,499
 792,607
 
 877,296
Total assets$15,875,910
 $2,838,270
 $24,481,035
 $(18,503,007) $24,692,208
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,352,384
 $3,806,389
 $
 $12,158,773
Intercompany loans8,789,600
 (5,105,070) (3,684,530) 
 
Accrued interest(14,522) 94,874
 30,763
 
 111,115
Operating lease liabilities14,498
 519
 236,179
 
 251,196
Accounts payable and other liabilities342,828
 20,360
 782,512
 
 1,145,700
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 
 5,463
 
 5,463
Deferred income tax liabilities1,329
 
 199,502
 
 200,831
Total liabilities9,133,733
 3,363,067
 1,376,278
 
 13,873,078
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests102,657
 
 171,021
 
 273,678
Total equity6,639,520
 (524,797) 22,933,736
 (18,503,007) 10,545,452
Total liabilities and equity$15,875,910
 $2,838,270
 $24,481,035
 $(18,503,007) $24,692,208

 As of December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$1,844
 $119,508
 $21,937,026
 $
 $22,058,378
Cash and cash equivalents9,828
 
 71,527
 
 81,355
Escrow deposits and restricted cash39,816
 128
 66,954
 
 106,898
Investment in and advances to affiliates14,786,086
 2,916,060
 
 (17,702,146) 
Goodwill
 
 1,034,641
 
 1,034,641
Assets held for sale
 
 100,324
 
 100,324
Other assets55,936
 9,458
 507,551
 
 572,945
Total assets$14,893,510
 $3,045,154
 $23,718,023
 $(17,702,146) $23,954,541
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,895,641
 $2,380,421
 $
 $11,276,062
Intercompany loans7,835,266
 (7,127,624) (707,642) 
 
Accrued interest(6,410) 77,691
 22,677
 
 93,958
Accounts payable and other liabilities381,512
 24,635
 776,405
 
 1,182,552
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 
 61,202
 
 61,202
Deferred income taxes250,092
 
 
 
 250,092
Total liabilities8,460,460
 1,870,343
 2,533,063
 
 12,863,866
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
 
 158,490
 
 158,490
Total equity6,433,050
 1,174,811
 21,026,470
 (17,702,146) 10,932,185
Total liabilities and equity$14,893,510
 $3,045,154
 $23,718,023
 $(17,702,146) $23,954,541




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
 As of December 31, 2018
 Ventas, Inc. 
Ventas
Realty
 Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$3,598
 $112,691
 $20,521,615
 $
 $20,637,904
Cash and cash equivalents6,470
 
 65,807
 
 72,277
Escrow deposits and restricted cash4,211
 128
 54,848
 
 59,187
Investment in and advances to affiliates15,656,592
 2,726,198
 
 (18,382,790) 
Goodwill
 
 1,050,548
 
 1,050,548
Assets held for sale
 
 5,454
 
 5,454
Other assets45,989
 4,443
 708,753
 
 759,185
Total assets$15,716,860
 $2,843,460
 $22,407,025
 $(18,382,790) $22,584,555
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,620,867
 $2,112,832
 $
 $10,733,699
Intercompany loans8,580,896
 (5,629,764) (2,951,132) 
 
Accrued interest(9,953) 85,717
 23,903
 
 99,667
Accounts payable and other liabilities319,753
 19,178
 747,099
 
 1,086,030
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 
 205
 
 205
Deferred income taxes608
 
 204,611
 
 205,219
Total liabilities8,891,304
 3,095,998
 137,518
 
 12,124,820
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests13,746
 
 174,395
 
 188,141
Total equity6,811,810
 (252,538) 22,095,112
 (18,382,790) 10,271,594
Total liabilities and equity$15,716,860
 $2,843,460
 $22,407,025
 $(18,382,790) $22,584,555

 As of December 31, 2016
 Ventas, Inc. 
Ventas
Realty
 Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Assets         
Net real estate investments$2,007
 $173,259
 $21,017,430
 $
 $21,192,696
Cash and cash equivalents210,303
 
 76,404
 
 286,707
Escrow deposits and restricted cash198
 1,504
 78,945
 
 80,647
Investment in and advances to affiliates14,166,255
 2,938,442
 
 (17,104,697) 
Goodwill
 
 1,033,225
 
 1,033,225
Assets held for sale
 
 54,961
 
 54,961
Other assets35,468
 6,791
 476,105
 
 518,364
Total assets$14,414,231
 $3,119,996
 $22,737,070
 $(17,104,697) $23,166,600
Liabilities and equity         
Liabilities:         
Senior notes payable and other debt$
 $8,406,979
 $2,720,347
 $
 $11,127,326
Intercompany loans6,996,162
 (6,209,706) (786,456) 
 
Accrued interest(1,753) 67,156
 18,359
 
 83,762
Accounts payable and other liabilities89,115
 35,587
 783,226
 
 907,928
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
 (1) 1,463
 
 1,462
Deferred income taxes316,641
 
 
 
 316,641
Total liabilities7,400,165
 2,300,015
 2,736,939
 
 12,437,119
Redeemable OP unitholder and noncontrolling interests
 
 200,728
 
 200,728
Total equity7,014,066
 819,981
 19,799,403
 (17,104,697) 10,528,753
Total liabilities and equity$14,414,231
 $3,119,996
 $22,737,070
 $(17,104,697) $23,166,600






















NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Revenues                  
Rental income$2,383
 $178,165
 $1,413,050
 $
 $1,593,598
$1,074
 $142,562
 $1,466,240
 $
 $1,609,876
Resident fees and services
 
 1,843,232
 
 1,843,232

 
 2,151,533
 
 2,151,533
Office building and other services revenues
 
 13,677
 
 13,677

 
 11,156
 
 11,156
Income from loans and investments1,236
 
 116,372
 
 117,608
2,812
 
 86,389
 
 89,201
Equity earnings in affiliates488,862
 
 (1,620) (487,242) 
362,143
 
 (2,469) (359,674) 
Interest and other income5,388
 
 646
 
 6,034
214
 192
 10,578
 
 10,984
Total revenues497,869
 178,165
 3,385,357
 (487,242) 3,574,149
366,243
 142,754
 3,723,427
 (359,674) 3,872,750
Expenses                  
Interest(101,222) 319,630
 229,788
 
 448,196
(87,222) 323,860
 215,024
 
 451,662
Depreciation and amortization5,483
 7,510
 874,955
 
 887,948
5,686
 5,410
 1,034,524
 
 1,045,620
Property-level operating expenses
 329
 1,482,743
 
 1,483,072

 578
 1,807,630
 
 1,808,208
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391

 
 2,319
 
 2,319
General, administrative and professional fees2,056
 16,976
 116,458
 
 135,490
6,512
 17,958
 141,526
 
 165,996
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net
 943
 (189) 
 754
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 41,875
 25
 
 41,900
Merger-related expenses and deal costs9,797
 
 738
 
 10,535
7,170
 
 8,065
 
 15,235
Other2,247
 1
 17,804
 
 20,052
2,077
 2
 (19,688) 
 (17,609)
Total expenses(81,639) 345,389
 2,725,688
 
 2,989,438
(65,777) 389,683
 3,189,425
 
 3,513,331
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, real estate dispositions and noncontrolling interests579,508
 (167,224) 659,669
 (487,242) 584,711
Income (loss) from unconsolidated entities
 5,306
 (5,867) 
 (561)
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes and noncontrolling interests432,020
 (246,929) 534,002
 (359,674) 359,419
Loss from unconsolidated entities
 
 (2,454) 
 (2,454)
Gain on real estate dispositions930
 88
 25,004
 
 26,022
Income tax benefit59,799
 
 
 
 59,799
66
 
 56,244
 
 56,310
Income (loss) from continuing operations639,307
 (161,918) 653,802
 (487,242) 643,949
433,016
 (246,841) 612,796
 (359,674) 439,297
Discontinued operations(110) 
 
 
 (110)
Gain on real estate dispositions717,273
 
 
 
 717,273
Net income (loss)1,356,470
 (161,918) 653,802
 (487,242) 1,361,112
433,016
 (246,841) 612,796
 (359,674) 439,297
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642

 
 6,281
 
 6,281
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $(161,918) $649,160
 $(487,242) $1,356,470
$433,016
 $(246,841) $606,515
 $(359,674) $433,016




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Revenues                  
Rental income$2,670
 $196,991
 $1,276,515
 $
 $1,476,176
$1,407
 $139,043
 $1,373,357
 $
 $1,513,807
Resident fees and services
 
 1,847,306
 
 1,847,306

 
 2,069,477
 
 2,069,477
Office building and other services revenues1,605
 
 19,465
 
 21,070

 
 13,416
 
 13,416
Income from loans and investments341
 
 97,753
 
 98,094
1,640
 
 122,578
 
 124,218
Equity earnings in affiliates500,515
 
 (1,223) (499,292) 
308,764
 
 (2,696) (306,068) 
Interest and other income666
 
 210
 
 876
23,802
 19
 1,071
 
 24,892
Total revenues505,797
 196,991
 3,240,026
 (499,292) 3,443,522
335,613
 139,062
 3,577,203
 (306,068) 3,745,810
Expenses                  
Interest(46,650) 281,458
 184,932
 
 419,740
(98,411) 327,898
 213,010
 
 442,497
Depreciation and amortization8,968
 18,297
 871,659
 
 898,924
5,425
 5,680
 908,534
 
 919,639
Property-level operating expenses
 317
 1,434,445
 
 1,434,762

 283
 1,689,597
 
 1,689,880
Office building services costs
 
 7,311
 
 7,311

 
 1,418
 
 1,418
General, administrative and professional fees509
 18,320
 108,046
 
 126,875
(2,866) 18,845
 136,003
 
 151,982
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 2,770
 9
 
 2,779
355
 55,910
 1,989
 
 58,254
Merger-related expenses and deal costs23,068
 
 1,567
 
 24,635
25,880
 
 4,667
 
 30,547
Other(705) 41
 10,652
 
 9,988
4,881
 3
 61,884
 
 66,768
Total expenses(14,810) 321,203
 2,618,621
 
 2,925,014
(64,736) 408,619
 3,017,102
 
 3,360,985
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests520,607
 (124,212) 621,405
 (499,292) 518,508
Income from unconsolidated entities
 1,840
 2,518
 
 4,358
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests400,349
 (269,557) 560,101
 (306,068) 384,825
Loss from unconsolidated entities
 
 (55,034) 
 (55,034)
Gain on real estate dispositions6,653
 
 39,594
 
 46,247
Income tax benefit31,343
 
 
 
 31,343
2,475
 
 37,478
 
 39,953
Income (loss) from continuing operations551,950
 (122,372) 623,923
 (499,292) 554,209
409,477
 (269,557) 582,139
 (306,068) 415,991
Discontinued operations(922) 
 
 
 (922)(10) 
 
 
 (10)
Gain on real estate dispositions98,203
 
 
 
 98,203
Net income (loss)649,231
 (122,372) 623,923
 (499,292) 651,490
409,467
 (269,557) 582,139
 (306,068) 415,981
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 2,259
 
 2,259

 
 6,514
 
 6,514
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$649,231
 $(122,372) $621,664
 $(499,292) $649,231
$409,467
 $(269,557) $575,625
 $(306,068) $409,467




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Revenues         
Rental income$2,383
 $178,165
 $1,413,050
 $
 $1,593,598
Resident fees and services
 
 1,843,232
 
 1,843,232
Office building and other services revenues
 
 13,677
 
 13,677
Income from loans and investments1,236
 
 116,372
 
 117,608
Equity earnings in affiliates1,260,665
 
 5,086
 (1,265,751) 
Interest and other income5,388
 
 646
 
 6,034
Total revenues1,269,672
 178,165
 3,392,063
 (1,265,751) 3,574,149
Expenses         
Interest(101,385) 319,632
 229,949
 
 448,196
Depreciation and amortization5,483
 7,510
 874,955
 
 887,948
Property-level operating expenses
 330
 1,482,742
 
 1,483,072
Office building services costs
 
 3,391
 
 3,391
General, administrative and professional fees2,040
 16,976
 116,474
 
 135,490
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt, net
 942
 (188) 
 754
Merger-related expenses and deal costs9,796
 
 739
 
 10,535
Other2,247
 1
 17,804
 
 20,052
Total expenses(81,819) 345,391
 2,725,866
 
 2,989,438
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, real estate dispositions, income taxes, discontinued operations and noncontrolling interests1,351,491
 (167,226) 666,197
 (1,265,751) 584,711
Loss from unconsolidated entities
 
 (561) 
 (561)
Gain on real estate dispositions
 675,808
 41,465
 
 717,273
Income tax benefit5,089
 
 54,710
 
 59,799
Income from continuing operations1,356,580
 508,582
 761,811
 (1,265,751) 1,361,222
Discontinued operations(110) 
 
 
 (110)
Net income1,356,470
 508,582
 761,811
 (1,265,751) 1,361,112
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $508,582
 $757,169
 $(1,265,751) $1,356,470

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Revenues         
Rental income$3,663
 $198,017
 $1,144,366
 $
 $1,346,046
Resident fees and services
 
 1,811,255
 
 1,811,255
Office building and other services revenues895
 
 40,597
 
 41,492
Income from loans and investments8,605
 534
 77,414
 
 86,553
Equity earnings in affiliates458,213
 
 (649) (457,564) 
Interest and other income495
 (6) 563
 
 1,052
Total revenues471,871
 198,545
 3,073,546
 (457,564) 3,286,398
Expenses         
Interest(38,393) 257,503
 148,004
 
 367,114
Depreciation and amortization5,443
 14,679
 873,935
 
 894,057
Property-level operating expenses
 367
 1,383,273
 
 1,383,640
Office building services costs
 
 26,565
 
 26,565
General, administrative and professional fees(321) 20,777
 107,579
 
 128,035
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
 4,523
 9,888
 
 14,411
Merger-related expenses and deal costs98,644
 75
 4,225
 
 102,944
Other(358) 45
 18,270
 
 17,957
Total expenses65,015
 297,969
 2,571,739
 
 2,934,723
Income (loss) before unconsolidated entities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and noncontrolling interests406,856
 (99,424) 501,807
 (457,564) 351,675
Loss from unconsolidated entities
 (183) (1,237) 
 (1,420)
Income tax benefit39,284
 
 
 
 39,284
Income (loss) from continuing operations446,140
 (99,607) 500,570
 (457,564) 389,539
Discontinued operations(46,877)
34,748

23,232
 
 11,103
Gain on real estate dispositions18,580
 
 
 
 18,580
Net income (loss)417,843
 (64,859) 523,802
 (457,564) 419,222
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$417,843
 $(64,859) $522,423
 $(457,564) $417,843




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net income (loss)$1,356,470
 $(161,918) $653,802
 $(487,242) $1,361,112
$433,016
 $(246,841) $612,796
 $(359,674) $439,297
Other comprehensive (loss) income:         
Other comprehensive loss:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 20,612
 
 20,612

 
 5,729
 
 5,729
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(437) 
 
 
 (437)
Other
 
 2,239
 
 2,239
Total other comprehensive (loss) income(437) 
 22,851
 
 22,414
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
 11,634
 
 11,634
Derivative instruments
 
 (30,814) 
 (30,814)
Total other comprehensive loss
 
 (13,451) 
 (13,451)
Comprehensive income (loss)1,356,033
 (161,918) 676,653
 (487,242) 1,383,526
433,016
 (246,841) 599,345
 (359,674) 425,846
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642

 
 7,649
 
 7,649
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$1,356,033
 $(161,918) $672,011
 $(487,242) $1,378,884
$433,016
 $(246,841) $591,696
 $(359,674) $418,197
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net income (loss)$649,231
 $(122,372) $623,923
 $(499,292) $651,490
$409,467
 $(269,557) $582,139
 $(306,068) $415,981
Other comprehensive loss:         
Other comprehensive income:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 (52,266) 
 (52,266)
 
 (9,436) 
 (9,436)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(310) 
 
 
 (310)
Other
 
 2,607
 
 2,607
Total other comprehensive loss(310) 
 (49,659) 
 (49,969)
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
 14,944
 
 14,944
Derivative instruments
 
 10,030
 
 10,030
Total other comprehensive income
 
 15,538
 
 15,538
Comprehensive income (loss)648,921
 (122,372) 574,264
 (499,292) 601,521
409,467
 (269,557) 597,677
 (306,068) 431,519
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 2,259
 
 2,259

 
 6,514
 
 6,514
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$648,921
 $(122,372) $572,005
 $(499,292) $599,262
$409,467
 $(269,557) $591,163
 $(306,068) $425,005
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net income (loss)$417,843
 $(64,859) $523,802
 $(457,564) $419,222
Other comprehensive loss:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 (14,792) 
 (14,792)
Unrealized loss on government-sponsored pooled loan investments(5,236) 
 
 
 (5,236)
Other
 
 (658) 
 (658)
Total other comprehensive loss(5,236) 
 (15,450) 
 (20,686)
Comprehensive income (loss)412,607
 (64,859) 508,352
 (457,564) 398,536
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 1,379
 
 1,379
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$412,607
 $(64,859) $506,973
 $(457,564) $397,157
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net income$1,356,470
 $508,582
 $761,811
 $(1,265,751) $1,361,112
Other comprehensive income:         
Foreign currency translation
 
 20,612
 
 20,612
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities
 
 (437) 
 (437)
Derivative instruments
 
 2,239
 
 2,239
Total other comprehensive income
 
 22,414
 
 22,414
Comprehensive income1,356,470
 508,582
 784,225
 (1,265,751) 1,383,526
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 4,642
 
 4,642
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$1,356,470
 $508,582
 $779,583
 $(1,265,751) $1,378,884






NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$150,548
 $(142,584) $1,434,216
 $
 $1,442,180
$59,433
 $(179,258) $1,557,608
 $
 $1,437,783
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Net investment in real estate property(350,900) 
 (29,332) 
 (380,232)(235,807) 
 (722,318) 
 (958,125)
Investment in loans receivable and other(4,633) 
 (743,486) 
 (748,119)
Investment in loans receivable(21,799) 
 (1,236,388) 
 (1,258,187)
Proceeds from real estate disposals537,144
 
 287
 
 537,431
147,546
 
 309
 
 147,855
Proceeds from loans receivable47
 
 101,050
 
 101,097
60
 
 1,017,249
 
 1,017,309
Development project expenditures
 
 (299,085) 
 (299,085)(7,240) (790) (395,893) 
 (403,923)
Capital expenditures
 (726) (131,832) 
 (132,558)
 
 (156,724) 
 (156,724)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
 6,169
 
 6,169

 
 172
 
 172
Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
 (61,220) 
 (61,220)
 
 (3,855) 
 (3,855)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities181,658
 (726) (1,157,449) 
 (976,517)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims
 
 30,179
 
 30,179
Net cash used in investing activities(117,240) (790) (1,467,269) 
 (1,585,299)
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities
 478,868
 (94,085) 
 384,783

 (577,996) 8,105
 
 (569,891)
Net change in borrowings under commercial paper program
 565,524
 
 
 565,524
Proceeds from debt
 793,904
 317,745
 
 1,111,649

 1,793,154
 1,220,037
 
 3,013,191
Repayment of debt
 (778,606) (590,478) 
 (1,369,084)
 (2,109,894) (514,022) 
 (2,623,916)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(15,809) 
 
 

 (15,809)
Net change in intercompany debt1,002,694
 (917,917) (84,777) 
 
225,407
 525,608
 (751,015) 
 
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (20,450) (6,847) 
 (27,297)
 (16,348) (5,055) 
 (21,403)
Issuance of common stock, net73,596
 
 
 
 73,596
942,085
 
 
 
 942,085
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(804,901) 587,511
 217,390
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(827,285) 
 
 
 (827,285)(1,157,720) 
 
 
 (1,157,720)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
 
 (5,677) 
 (5,677)
 
 (9,218) 
 (9,218)
Purchases of redeemable OP Units
 
 (2,203) 
 (2,203)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 4,402
 
 4,402

 
 6,282
 
 6,282
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (11,187) 
 (11,187)
 
 (9,717) 
 (9,717)
Proceeds from stock option exercises36,179
 
 
 
 36,179
Other10,582
 
 
 
 10,582
(8,502) 
 (17) 
 (8,519)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(561,123) 143,310
 (253,514) 
 (671,327)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(228,917) 
 23,253
 
 (205,664)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents28,442
 
 (28,130) 
 312
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period210,303
 
 76,404
 
 286,707
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$9,828
 $
 $71,527
 $
 $81,355
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities37,449
 180,048
 (56,823) 
 160,674
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(20,358) 
 33,516
 
 13,158
Effect of foreign currency translation12,786
 
 (11,306) 
��1,480
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period10,681
 128
 120,655
 
 131,464
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$3,109
 $128
 $142,865
 $
 $146,102



















NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 ConsolidatedVentas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$69,496
 $(92,923) $1,395,768
 $
 $1,372,341
$45,334
 $(194,283) $1,530,416
 $
 $1,381,467
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Net investment in real estate property(1,448,230) 
 19,118
 
 (1,429,112)(265,907) 
 
 
 (265,907)
Investment in loans receivable and other
 
 (158,635) 
 (158,635)(4,307) 
 (225,227) 
 (229,534)
Proceeds from real estate disposals257,441
 
 43,120
 
 300,561
353,792
 
 
 
 353,792
Proceeds from loans receivable
 
 320,082
 
 320,082
1,490
 
 910,050
 
 911,540
Development project expenditures
 
 (143,647) 
 (143,647)
 
 (330,876) 
 (330,876)
Capital expenditures
 (314) (117,142) 
 (117,456)
 (1,199) (130,659) 
 (131,858)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
 57,455
 
 57,455
Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
 (6,436) 
 (6,436)
 
 (47,007) 
 (47,007)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,190,789) (314) (43,540) 
 (1,234,643)
Insurance proceeds for property damage claims
 
 6,891
 
 6,891
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities85,068
 (1,199) 240,627
 
 324,496
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
 (171,000) 135,363
 
 (35,637)
 326,620
 (5,157) 
 321,463
Proceeds from debt
 846,521
 46,697
 
 893,218

 2,309,141
 240,332
 
 2,549,473
Repayment of debt
 (651,820) (370,293) 
 (1,022,113)
 (2,954,654) (510,925) 
 (3,465,579)
Net change in intercompany debt990,056
 82,266
 (1,072,322) 
 
1,468,811
 530,236
 (1,999,047) 
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 
 (2,846) 
 (2,846)(8,271) 
 3,547
 
 (4,724)
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (5,787) (768) 
 (6,555)
 (15,861) (4,751) 
 (20,612)
Issuance of common stock, net1,286,680
 
 
 
 1,286,680
Cash distribution from (to) affiliates107,232
 (6,943) (100,289) 
 
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(490,214) 
 490,214
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,024,968) 
 
 
 (1,024,968)(1,127,143) 
 
 
 (1,127,143)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders
 
 (8,640) 
 (8,640)
 
 (7,459) 
 (7,459)
Cash issued for redemption of OP Units
 
 (1,370) 
 (1,370)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 7,326
 
 7,326

 
 1,883
 
 1,883
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (6,879) 
 (6,879)
 
 (11,574) 
 (11,574)
Proceeds from stock option exercises8,762
 
 
 
 8,762
Other17,252
 
 
 
 17,252
(5,057) 
 
 
 (5,057)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,376,252
 93,237
 (1,372,651) 
 96,838
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents254,959
 
 (20,423) 
 234,536
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents(56,389) 
 55,537
 
 (852)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period11,733
 
 41,290
 
 53,023
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$210,303
 $
 $76,404
 $
 $286,707
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(153,112) 195,482
 (1,804,307) 
 (1,761,937)
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(22,710) 
 (33,264) 
 (55,974)
Effect of foreign currency translation(13,554) 
 12,739
 
 (815)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period46,945
 128
 141,180
 
 188,253
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$10,681
 $128
 $120,655
 $
 $131,464
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$149,923
 $(143,960) $1,422,789
 $
 $1,428,752
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Net investment in real estate property(635,352) 
 (29,332) 
 (664,684)
Investment in loans receivable and other(4,633) 
 (743,486) 
 (748,119)
Proceeds from real estate disposals859,587
 
 287
 
 859,874
Proceeds from loans receivable47
 
 101,050
 
 101,097
Development project expenditures
 
 (299,085) 
 (299,085)
Capital expenditures
 (726) (131,832) 
 (132,558)
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
 
 6,169
 
 6,169
Investment in unconsolidated entities
 
 (61,220) 
 (61,220)
   Insurance proceeds for property damage claims
 
 1,419
 
 1,419
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities219,649
 (726) (1,156,030) 
 (937,107)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
 478,868
 (94,085) 
 384,783
Proceeds from debt
 793,904
 317,745
 
 1,111,649
Repayment of debt
 (778,606) (590,478) 
 (1,369,084)
Net change in intercompany debt1,003,315
 (917,917) (85,398) 
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interests(15,809) 
 
 
 (15,809)
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (20,450) (6,847) 
 (27,297)
Issuance of common stock, net73,596
 
 
 
 73,596
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(803,257) 587,511
 215,746
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(827,285) 
 
 
 (827,285)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders


 (5,677) 
 (5,677)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 
 4,402
 
 4,402
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (11,187) 
 (11,187)
Proceeds from stock option exercises16,287
 
 
 
 16,287
Other(5,705) 
 
 
 (5,705)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(558,858) 143,310
 (255,779) 
 (671,327)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(189,286) (1,376) 10,980
 
 (179,682)
Effect of foreign currency translation28,442
 
 (27,861) 
 581
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period207,789
 1,504
 158,061
 
 367,354
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$46,945
 $128
 $141,180
 $
 $188,253

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Ventas, Inc. Ventas Realty Ventas Subsidiaries 
Consolidated
Elimination
 Consolidated
 (In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(115,977) $16,528
 $1,498,280
 $
 $1,398,831
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Net investment in real estate property(2,650,788) 
 
 
 (2,650,788)
Investment in loans receivable and other
 
 (171,144) 
 (171,144)
Proceeds from real estate disposals492,408
 
 
 
 492,408
Proceeds from loans receivable
 
 109,176
 
 109,176
Proceeds from sale or maturity of marketable securities76,800
 
 
 
 76,800
Funds held in escrow for future development expenditures
 
 4,003
 
 4,003
Development project expenditures
 
 (119,674) 
 (119,674)
Capital expenditures
 (15,733) (91,754) 
 (107,487)
Investment in unconsolidated entities(26,282) 
 (30,704) 
 (56,986)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,107,862) (15,733) (300,097) 
 (2,423,692)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Net change in borrowings under unsecured revolving credit facility
 (584,000) (139,457) 
 (723,457)
Net cash impact of CCP spin-off1,273,000
 
 (1,401,749) 
 (128,749)
Proceeds from debt
 2,292,568
 220,179
 
 2,512,747
Issuance of debt related to CCP spin-off
 
 1,400,000
 
 1,400,000
Repayment of debt
 (705,000) (730,596) 
 (1,435,596)
Net change in intercompany debt1,782,954
 (1,008,773) (774,181) 
 
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
 
 (3,819) 
 (3,819)
Payment of deferred financing costs
 (22,297) (2,368) 
 (24,665)
Issuance of common stock, net491,023
 
 
 
 491,023
Cash distribution (to) from affiliates(315,466) 26,707
 288,759
 
 
Cash distribution to common stockholders(1,003,413) 
 
 
 (1,003,413)
Cash distribution to redeemable OP unitholders


 (15,095) 
 (15,095)
Purchases of redeemable OP units
 
 (33,188) 
 (33,188)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 (12,649) 
 (12,649)
Other(81) 
 
 
 (81)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities2,228,017
 (795) (1,204,164) 
 1,023,058
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents4,178
 
 (5,981) 
 (1,803)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents(17,302) 
 16,780
 
 (522)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period24,857
 
 30,491
 
 55,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$11,733
 $
 $41,290
 $
 $53,023

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


NOTE 21—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In January 2018, we transitioned the management of 76 private pay seniors housing communities to Eclipse Senior Living (“ESL”). These assets, substantially all of which were previously leased by Elmcroft Senior Living (“Elmcroft”), are now operated by ESL under a management contract with us. We acquired a 34% ownership stake in ESL with customary rights and protections. ESL management owns the remaining 66% stake. We also intend to form a new joint venture with an institutional partner related to the assets previously leased by Elmcroft. However, there can be no assurance whether, when or on what terms the joint venture will be completed.






VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS


Allowance Accounts   Additions Deductions     Additions Deductions  
 
(In thousands)

 
(In thousands)

Year Ended December 31, Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to Earnings Acquired Properties Uncollectible Accounts Written-off Disposed Properties Balance at End of Year Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to Earnings Acquired Properties Uncollectible Accounts Written-off Disposed Properties Balance at End of Year
                        
2018            
Allowance for doubtful accounts $15,164
 10,708
 3,515
 (7,533) (9) $21,845
Straight-line rent receivable allowance (1)
 $117,764
 (71,543) 
 
 (1,576) $44,645
 $132,928
 (60,835) 3,515
 (7,533) (1,585) $66,490
            
2017                        
Allowance for doubtful accounts 11,636
 7,207
 
 (3,237) (443) $15,163
 $11,637
 7,207
 
 (3,237) (443) $15,164
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 109,836
 8,540
 
 
 (612) $117,764
 $109,836
 8,540
 
 
 (612) $117,764
 121,472
 15,747
 
 (3,237) (1,055) $132,927
 $121,473
 15,747
 
 (3,237) (1,055) $132,928
            
2016            
Allowance for doubtful accounts 13,546
 5,093
 
 (7,111) 108
 $11,636
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 101,418
 9,682
 
 
 (1,264) $109,836
 114,964
 14,775
 
 (7,111) (1,156) $121,472
            
2015            
Allowance for doubtful accounts 11,460
 10,937
 753
 (12,977) 3,373
 $13,546
Straight-line rent receivable allowance 83,461
 35,448
 
 
 (17,491) $101,418
 94,921
 46,385
 753
 (12,977) (14,118) $114,964


(1)
Amounts charged to earnings primarily relate to termination of lease arrangements with Elmcroft in January 2018.




VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 20152019 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Reconciliation of real estate:          
Carrying cost:          
Balance at beginning of period$23,816,586
 $22,458,032
 $19,241,735
$24,973,983
 $24,712,478
 $23,859,816
Additions during period:          
Acquisitions702,501
 1,380,044
 4,063,355
1,941,016
 318,895
 702,501
Capital expenditures452,419
 270,664
 229,560
563,706
 446,490
 453,829
Deductions during period:          
Foreign currency translation93,490
 (6,252) (209,460)107,508
 (105,192) 93,490
Other(1)
(397,158) (285,902) (867,158)(460,490) (398,688) (397,158)
Balance at end of period$24,667,838
 $23,816,586
 $22,458,032
$27,125,723
 $24,973,983
 $24,712,478
          
Accumulated depreciation:          
Balance at beginning of period$4,190,496
 $3,544,625
 $2,925,508
$5,492,310
 $4,802,917
 $4,208,010
Additions during period:          
Depreciation expense760,314
 732,309
 778,419
828,954
 791,882
 760,314
Dispositions:          
Sales and/or transfers to assets held for sale(176,926) (87,431) (144,545)(136,093) (84,819) (176,918)
Foreign currency translation11,511
 993
 (14,757)12,755
 (17,670) 11,511
Balance at end of period$4,785,395
 $4,190,496
 $3,544,625
$6,197,926
 $5,492,310
 $4,802,917

(1) 
Other may include sales, transfers to assets held for sale and impairments.


VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 20172019
(Dollars in thousands)

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
SPECIALTY HOSPITALS           
   
Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern ArizonaTucsonAZ$
$770
$25,589
$
$770
$25,589
$26,359
$6,388
$19,971
1992201135 years
Kindred Hospital - BreaBreaCA
3,144
2,611

3,144
2,611
5,755
1,605
4,150
1990199540 years
Kindred Hospital - OntarioOntarioCA
523
2,988

523
2,988
3,511
3,228
283
1950199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San DiegoSan DiegoCA
670
11,764

670
11,764
12,434
11,942
492
1965199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay AreaSan LeandroCA
2,735
5,870

2,735
5,870
8,605
6,187
2,418
1962199325 years
Tustin Rehabilitation HospitalTustinCA
2,810
25,248

2,810
25,248
28,058
6,424
21,634
1991201135 years
Kindred Hospital - WestminsterWestminsterCA
727
7,384

727
7,384
8,111
7,562
549
1973199320 years
Kindred Hospital - DenverDenverCO
896
6,367

896
6,367
7,263
6,712
551
1963199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral GablesCoral GablesFL
1,071
5,348
(1,000)71
5,348
5,419
5,196
223
1956199230 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. LauderdaleFort LauderdaleFL
1,758
14,080

1,758
14,080
15,838
14,154
1,684
1969198930 years
Kindred Hospital - North FloridaGreen Cove SpringsFL
145
4,613

145
4,613
4,758
4,683
75
1956199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - HollywoodHollywoodFL
605
5,229

605
5,229
5,834
5,234
600
1937199520 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. PetersburgSt. PetersburgFL
1,401
16,706

1,401
16,706
18,107
15,050
3,057
1968199740 years
Kindred Hospital - Central TampaTampaFL
2,732
7,676

2,732
7,676
10,408
5,647
4,761
1970199340 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)ChicagoIL
1,583
19,980

1,583
19,980
21,563
20,004
1,559
1949199525 years
Kindred - Chicago - LakeshoreChicagoIL
1,513
9,525

1,513
9,525
11,038
9,480
1,558
1995197620 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)NorthlakeIL
850
6,498

850
6,498
7,348
6,552
796
1960199130 years
Kindred Hospital - SycamoreSycamoreIL
77
8,549

77
8,549
8,626
8,403
223
1949199320 years
Kindred Hospital - IndianapolisIndianapolisIN
985
3,801

985
3,801
4,786
3,775
1,011
1955199330 years
Kindred Hospital - LouisvilleLouisvilleKY
3,041
12,279

3,041
12,279
15,320
12,580
2,740
1964199520 years
Kindred Hospital - St. LouisSt. LouisMO
1,126
2,087

1,126
2,087
3,213
2,020
1,193
1984199140 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)Las VegasNV
1,110
2,177

1,110
2,177
3,287
1,543
1,744
1980199440 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
401
17,796
1,068
401
18,864
19,265
2,646
16,619
1989201536 years
Kindred Hospital - AlbuquerqueAlbuquerqueNM
11
4,253

11
4,253
4,264
3,125
1,139
1985199340 years
Kindred Hospital - GreensboroGreensboroNC
1,010
7,586

1,010
7,586
8,596
7,758
838
1964199420 years
University Hospitals Rehabilitation HospitalBeachwoodOH
1,800
16,444

1,800
16,444
18,244
3,176
15,068
2013201335 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Kindred Hospital - PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPA
135
5,223

135
5,223
5,358
3,807
1,551
1960199535 years
Kindred Hospital - ChattanoogaChattanoogaTN
756
4,415

756
4,415
5,171
4,288
883
1975199322 years
Ardent Harrington Cancer CenterAmarilloTX
974
7,752

974
7,752
8,726

8,726
CIPCIPCIP
Rehabilitation Hospital of DallasDallasTX
2,318
38,702

2,318
38,702
41,020
6,054
34,966
2009201535 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation - Ft. Worth TXFort WorthTX
2,071
16,018

2,071
16,018
18,089
2,719
15,370
2008201535 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)Fort WorthTX
2,342
7,458

2,342
7,458
9,800
7,507
2,293
1987198620 years
Rehabilitation Hospital The VintageHoustonTX
1,838
34,832

1,838
34,832
36,670
5,714
30,956
2012201535 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)HoustonTX
1,699
6,788

1,699
6,788
8,487
6,080
2,407
1986198540 years
Kindred Hospital - HoustonHoustonTX
33
7,062

33
7,062
7,095
6,726
369
1972199420 years
Kindred Hospital - MansfieldMansfieldTX
267
2,462

267
2,462
2,729
2,127
602
1983199040 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TXSan AntonioTX
1,859
18,301

1,859
18,301
20,160
3,046
17,114
2010201535 years
Kindred Hospital - San AntonioSan AntonioTX
249
11,413

249
11,413
11,662
10,236
1,426
1981199330 years
TOTAL FOR SPECIALTY HOSPITALS  
48,035
412,874
68
47,035
413,942
460,977
239,378
221,599
   
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  

  
  
  
  
  
   
    
Englewood Post Acute and RehabilitationEnglewoodCO
241
2,180
194
241
2,374
2,615
2,161
454
1960199530 years
Brookdale Lisle SNFLisleIL
730
9,270
711
910
9,801
10,711
3,363
7,348
1990200935 years
Lopatcong CenterPhillipsburgNJ
1,490
12,336

1,490
12,336
13,826
6,815
7,011
1982200430 years
The BelvedereChesterPA
822
7,203

822
7,203
8,025
3,970
4,055
1899200430 years
Pennsburg ManorPennsburgPA
1,091
7,871

1,091
7,871
8,962
4,384
4,578
1982200430 years
Chapel ManorPhiladelphiaPA
1,595
13,982
1,358
1,595
15,340
16,935
9,036
7,899
1948200430 years
Wayne CenterStraffordPA
662
6,872
850
662
7,722
8,384
4,616
3,768
1897200430 years
Everett Rehabilitation & CareEverettWA
2,750
27,337

2,750
27,337
30,087
7,058
23,029
1995201135 years
Beacon Hill RehabilitationLongviewWA
145
2,563
171
145
2,734
2,879
2,589
290
1955199229 years
Columbia Crest Care & Rehabilitation CenterMoses LakeWA
660
17,439

660
17,439
18,099
4,575
13,524
1972201135 years
Lake Ridge Solana Alzheimer's Care CenterMoses LakeWA
660
8,866

660
8,866
9,526
2,408
7,118
1988201135 years
Rainier RehabilitationPuyallupWA
520
4,780
305
520
5,085
5,605
3,676
1,929
1986199140 years
Logan CenterLoganWV
300
12,959

300
12,959
13,259
3,344
9,915
1987201135 years
Ravenswood Healthcare CenterRavenswoodWV
320
12,710

320
12,710
13,030
3,293
9,737
1987201135 years
Valley CenterSouth CharlestonWV
750
24,115

750
24,115
24,865
6,302
18,563
1987201135 years
White SulphurWhite Sulphur SpringsWV
250
13,055

250
13,055
13,305
3,401
9,904
1987201135 years
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  
12,986
183,538
3,589
13,166
186,947
200,113
70,991
129,122
   
                    
GENERAL ACUTE CARE  
          
Lovelace Medical Center DowntownAlbuquerqueNM
9,840
154,017
9,763
9,928
163,692
173,620
24,502
149,118
1968201533.5 years
Lovelace Westside HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
10,107
13,576
2,133
10,107
15,709
25,816
5,451
20,365
1984201520 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lovelace Women's HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
7,236
175,142
20,075
7,236
195,217
202,453
19,417
183,036
1983201547 years
Roswell Regional HospitalRoswellNM
2,560
41,125
2,186
2,560
43,311
45,871
4,662
41,209
2007201547 years
Hillcrest Hospital ClaremoreClaremoreOK
3,623
23,864
638
3,623
24,502
28,125
3,296
24,829
1955201540 years
Bailey Medical CenterOwassoOK
4,964
7,059
155
4,964
7,214
12,178
1,484
10,694
2006201532.5 years
Hillcrest Medical CenterTulsaOK
28,319
215,959
12,718
28,319
228,677
256,996
32,698
224,298
1928201534 years
Hillcrest Hospital SouthTulsaOK
17,026
112,231
1,016
17,026
113,247
130,273
13,703
116,570
1999201540 years
SouthCreek Medical PlazaTulsaOK
2,943
17,860
599
2,943
18,459
21,402
819
20,583
2003201835 years
Baptist St. Anthony's HospitalAmarilloTX
13,779
357,733
26,812
13,015
385,309
398,324
39,473
358,851
1967201544.5 years
Spire Hull and East Riding HospitalAnlabyHUL
3,194
81,613
(12,561)2,721
69,525
72,246
8,167
64,079
2010201450 years
Spire Fylde Coast HospitalBlackpoolLAN
2,446
28,896
(4,642)2,084
24,616
26,700
2,934
23,766
1980201450 years
Spire Clare Park HospitalFarnhamSUR
6,263
26,119
(4,797)5,335
22,250
27,585
2,757
24,828
2009201450 years
TOTAL FOR GENERAL ACUTE CARE  
112,300
1,255,194
54,095
109,861
1,311,728
1,421,589
159,363
1,262,226
   
BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Brookdale Chandler Ray RoadChandlerAZ
2,000
6,538
178
2,000
6,716
8,716
1,836
6,880
1998201135 years
Brookdale Springs MesaMesaAZ
2,747
24,918
1,401
2,751
26,315
29,066
12,087
16,979
1986200535 years
Brookdale East ArborMesaAZ
655
6,998
196
711
7,138
7,849
3,377
4,472
1998200535 years
Brookdale Oro ValleyOro ValleyAZ
666
6,169

666
6,169
6,835
2,966
3,869
1998200535 years
Brookdale PeoriaPeoriaAZ
598
4,872
670
650
5,490
6,140
2,346
3,794
1998200535 years
Brookdale TempeTempeAZ
611
4,066
150
611
4,216
4,827
1,960
2,867
1997200535 years
Brookdale East TucsonTucsonAZ
506
4,745
50
556
4,745
5,301
2,282
3,019
1998200535 years
Brookdale AnaheimAnaheimCA
2,464
7,908
95
2,464
8,003
10,467
3,598
6,869
1977200535 years
Brookdale Redwood CityRedwood CityCA
7,669
66,691
422
7,719
67,063
74,782
32,460
42,322
1988200535 years
Brookdale San JoseSan JoseCA
6,240
66,329
14,386
6,250
80,705
86,955
34,064
52,891
1987200535 years
Brookdale San MarcosSan MarcosCA
4,288
36,204
235
4,314
36,413
40,727
17,723
23,004
1987200535 years
Brookdale TracyTracyCA
1,110
13,296
521
1,110
13,817
14,927
5,758
9,169
1986200535 years
Brookdale Boulder CreekBoulderCO
1,290
20,683
402
1,414
20,961
22,375
5,489
16,886
1985201135 years
Brookdale Vista GrandeColorado SpringsCO
715
9,279

715
9,279
9,994
4,462
5,532
1997200535 years
Brookdale El CaminoPuebloCO
840
9,403
76
874
9,445
10,319
4,523
5,796
1997200535 years
Brookdale FarmingtonFarmingtonCT
3,995
36,310
492
4,016
36,781
40,797
17,572
23,225
1984200535 years
Brookdale South WindsorSouth WindsorCT
2,187
12,682
88
2,198
12,759
14,957
5,726
9,231
1999200435 years
Brookdale ChatfieldWest HartfordCT
2,493
22,833
23,667
2,493
46,500
48,993
13,584
35,409
1989200535 years
Brookdale Bonita SpringsBonita SpringsFL
1,540
10,783
726
1,594
11,455
13,049
5,185
7,864
1989200535 years
Brookdale West Boynton BeachBoynton BeachFL
2,317
16,218
903
2,347
17,091
19,438
7,572
11,866
1999200535 years
Brookdale Deer Creek AL/MCDeerfield BeachFL
1,399
9,791
18
1,399
9,809
11,208
4,850
6,358
1999200535 years
Brookdale Fort Myers The ColonyFort MyersFL
1,510
7,862
390
1,510
8,252
9,762
2,059
7,703
1996201135 years
Brookdale AvondaleJacksonvilleFL
860
16,745
140
860
16,885
17,745
4,256
13,489
1997201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Crown PointJacksonvilleFL
1,300
9,659
567
1,300
10,226
11,526
2,493
9,033
1997201135 years
Brookdale Jensen BeachJensen BeachFL
1,831
12,820
639
1,831
13,459
15,290
6,113
9,177
1999200535 years
Brookdale Ormond Beach WestOrmond BeachFL
1,660
9,738
27
1,660
9,765
11,425
2,530
8,895
1997201135 years
Brookdale Palm CoastPalm CoastFL
470
9,187

470
9,187
9,657
2,399
7,258
1997201135 years
Brookdale PensacolaPensacolaFL
633
6,087
11
633
6,098
6,731
2,929
3,802
1998200535 years
Brookdale RotondaRotonda WestFL
1,740
4,331
170
1,740
4,501
6,241
1,348
4,893
1997201135 years
Brookdale Centre Pointe BoulevardTallahasseeFL
667
6,168

667
6,168
6,835
2,966
3,869
1998200535 years
Brookdale TavaresTavaresFL
280
15,980

280
15,980
16,260
4,058
12,202
1997201135 years
Brookdale West Melbourne MCWest MelbourneFL
586
5,481

586
5,481
6,067
2,635
3,432
2000200535 years
Brookdale West Palm BeachWest Palm BeachFL
3,758
33,072
1,277
3,935
34,172
38,107
16,151
21,956
1990200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven MCWinter HavenFL
232
3,006

232
3,006
3,238
1,445
1,793
1997200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven ALWinter HavenFL
438
5,549
133
438
5,682
6,120
2,668
3,452
1997200535 years
Brookdale Twin FallsTwin FallsID
703
6,153
1,065
718
7,203
7,921
2,961
4,960
1997200535 years
Brookdale Lake Shore DriveChicagoIL
11,057
107,517
6,336
11,089
113,821
124,910
53,755
71,155
1990200535 years
Brookdale Lake ViewChicagoIL
3,072
26,668

3,072
26,668
29,740
12,980
16,760
1950200535 years
Brookdale Des PlainesDes PlainesIL
6,871
60,165
(41)6,805
60,190
66,995
29,257
37,738
1993200535 years
Brookdale Hoffman EstatesHoffman EstatesIL
3,886
44,130
3,848
4,273
47,591
51,864
20,890
30,974
1987200535 years
Brookdale Lisle IL/ALLisleIL33,000
7,953
70,400

7,953
70,400
78,353
34,170
44,183
1990200535 years
Brookdale NorthbrookNorthbrookIL
1,988
39,762
652
2,076
40,326
42,402
18,346
24,056
1999200435 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes IL/ALVernon HillsIL
4,439
35,044
624
4,480
35,627
40,107
17,362
22,745
1987200535 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes ALVernon HillsIL
1,147
10,041
401
1,175
10,414
11,589
4,885
6,704
1999200535 years
Brookdale RichmondRichmondIN
495
4,124
342
555
4,406
4,961
1,992
2,969
1998200535 years
Brookdale DerbyDerbyKS
440
4,422

440
4,422
4,862
1,169
3,693
1994201135 years
Brookdale Leawood State LineLeawoodKS
117
5,127
224
117
5,351
5,468
2,472
2,996
2000200535 years
Brookdale Salina FairdaleSalinaKS
300
5,657
150
353
5,754
6,107
1,496
4,611
1996201135 years
Brookdale TopekaTopekaKS
370
6,825

370
6,825
7,195
3,282
3,913
2000200535 years
Brookdale Cushing ParkFraminghamMA
5,819
33,361
2,907
5,872
36,215
42,087
15,942
26,145
1999200435 years
Brookdale Cape CodHyannisMA
1,277
9,063
237
1,277
9,300
10,577
3,889
6,688
1999200535 years
Brookdale Quincy BayQuincyMA
6,101
57,862
3,566
6,216
61,313
67,529
27,935
39,594
1986200535 years
Brookdale Delta MCDelta TownshipMI
730
11,471
119
730
11,590
12,320
2,956
9,364
1998201135 years
Brookdale Delta ALDelta TownshipMI
820
3,313
30
820
3,343
4,163
1,191
2,972
1998201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills NorthFarmington HillsMI
580
10,497
91
580
10,588
11,168
3,014
8,154
1994201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North IIFarmington HillsMI
700
10,246

700
10,246
10,946
3,052
7,894
1994201135 years
Brookdale Meridian ALHaslettMI
1,340
6,134
288
1,367
6,395
7,762
1,715
6,047
1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc MCHollyMI
450
12,373
105
450
12,478
12,928
3,191
9,737
1998201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Grand Blanc ALHollyMI
620
14,627

620
14,627
15,247
3,789
11,458
1998201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale NorthvilleNorthvilleMI
407
6,068
149
407
6,217
6,624
2,920
3,704
1996200535 years
Brookdale Troy MCTroyMI
630
17,178

630
17,178
17,808
4,398
13,410
1998201135 years
Brookdale Troy ALTroyMI
950
12,503
270
950
12,773
13,723
3,391
10,332
1998201135 years
Brookdale Utica ALUticaMI
1,142
11,808
624
1,142
12,432
13,574
5,689
7,885
1996200535 years
Brookdale Utica MCUticaMI
700
8,657
334
700
8,991
9,691
2,375
7,316
1995201135 years
Brookdale Eden PrairieEden PrairieMN
301
6,228
763
332
6,960
7,292
2,997
4,295
1998200535 years
Brookdale FaribaultFaribaultMN
530
1,085

530
1,085
1,615
344
1,271
1997201135 years
Brookdale Inver Grove HeightsInver Grove HeightsMN
253
2,655

253
2,655
2,908
1,277
1,631
1997200535 years
Brookdale MankatoMankatoMN
490
410

490
410
900
239
661
1996201135 years
Brookdale EdinaMinneapolisMN15,040
3,621
33,141
22,975
3,621
56,116
59,737
19,375
40,362
1998200535 years
Brookdale North OaksNorth OaksMN
1,057
8,296
979
1,122
9,210
10,332
3,992
6,340
1998200535 years
Brookdale PlymouthPlymouthMN
679
8,675
583
679
9,258
9,937
4,172
5,765
1998200535 years
Brookdale WillmarWilmarMN
470
4,833

470
4,833
5,303
1,254
4,049
1997201135 years
Brookdale WinonaWinonaMN
800
1,390

800
1,390
2,190
724
1,466
1997201135 years
Brookdale West CountyBallwinMO
3,100
35,074
177
3,113
35,238
38,351
6,142
32,209
2012201435 years
Brookdale EveshamVoorhees TownshipNJ
3,158
29,909
125
3,158
30,034
33,192
14,389
18,803
1987200535 years
Brookdale WestamptonWestamptonNJ
881
4,741
829
881
5,570
6,451
2,302
4,149
1997200535 years
Brookdale Santa FeSanta FeNM

28,178


28,178
28,178
13,333
14,845
1986200535 years
Brookdale KenmoreBuffaloNY
1,487
15,170
752
1,487
15,922
17,409
7,294
10,115
1995200535 years
Brookdale Clinton ILClintonNY
947
7,528
604
961
8,118
9,079
3,637
5,442
1991200535 years
Brookdale ManliusManliusNY
890
28,237
303
190
29,240
29,430
7,183
22,247
1994201135 years
Brookdale PittsfordPittsfordNY
611
4,066
16
611
4,082
4,693
1,958
2,735
1997200535 years
Brookdale East NiskayunaSchenectadyNY
1,021
8,333
715
1,021
9,048
10,069
4,019
6,050
1997200535 years
Brookdale NiskayunaSchenectadyNY
1,884
16,103
30
1,884
16,133
18,017
7,744
10,273
1996200535 years
Brookdale SummerfieldSyracuseNY
1,132
11,434
278
1,246
11,598
12,844
5,499
7,345
1991200535 years
Brookdale WilliamsvilleWilliamsvilleNY
839
3,841
60
839
3,901
4,740
1,854
2,886
1997200535 years
Brookdale CaryCaryNC
724
6,466

724
6,466
7,190
3,109
4,081
1997200535 years
Brookdale Falling CreekHickoryNC
330
10,981

330
10,981
11,311
2,827
8,484
1997201135 years
Brookdale Winston-SalemWinston-SalemNC
368
3,497
249
368
3,746
4,114
1,682
2,432
1997200535 years
Brookdale AllianceAllianceOH
392
6,283
49
435
6,289
6,724
3,022
3,702
1998200535 years
Brookdale AustintownAustintownOH
151
3,087
672
181
3,729
3,910
1,485
2,425
1999200535 years
Brookdale BarbertonBarbertonOH
440
10,884

440
10,884
11,324
2,803
8,521
1997201135 years
Brookdale BeavercreekBeavercreekOH
587
5,381

587
5,381
5,968
2,588
3,380
1998200535 years
Brookdale Centennial ParkClaytonOH
630
6,477

630
6,477
7,107
1,733
5,374
1997201135 years
Brookdale WestervilleColumbusOH
267
3,600

267
3,600
3,867
1,731
2,136
1999200535 years
Brookdale Greenville AL/MCGreenvilleOH
490
4,144
55
545
4,144
4,689
1,246
3,443
1997201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (OH)SalemOH
634
4,659

634
4,659
5,293
2,240
3,053
1998200535 years
Brookdale SpringdaleSpringdaleOH
1,140
9,134
144
1,228
9,190
10,418
2,382
8,036
1997201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Bartlesville SouthBartlesvilleOK
250
10,529
35
285
10,529
10,814
2,686
8,128
1997201135 years
Brookdale Broken ArrowBroken ArrowOK
940
6,312
6,435
1,898
11,789
13,687
3,378
10,309
1996201135 years
Brookdale Forest GroveForest GroveOR
2,320
9,633

2,320
9,633
11,953
2,701
9,252
1994201135 years
Brookdale Mt. HoodGreshamOR
2,410
9,093
(1,986)319
9,198
9,517
2,556
6,961
1988201135 years
Brookdale McMinnville Town CenterMcMinnvilleOR457
1,230
7,561

1,230
7,561
8,791
2,334
6,457
1989201135 years
Brookdale Denton NorthDentonTX
1,750
6,712
43
1,750
6,755
8,505
1,768
6,737
1996201135 years
Brookdale EnnisEnnisTX
460
3,284

460
3,284
3,744
926
2,818
1996201135 years
Brookdale KerrvilleKerrvilleTX
460
8,548
120
460
8,668
9,128
2,205
6,923
1997201135 years
Brookdale Medical Center WhitbySan AntonioTX
1,400
10,051

1,400
10,051
11,451
2,616
8,835
1997201135 years
Brookdale Western HillsTempleTX
330
5,081
177
330
5,258
5,588
1,377
4,211
1997201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (VA)SalemVA
1,900
16,219

1,900
16,219
18,119
7,630
10,489
1998201135 years
Brookdale AlderwoodLynnwoodWA
1,219
9,573
58
1,239
9,611
10,850
4,607
6,243
1999200535 years
Brookdale Puyallup SouthPuyallupWA
1,055
8,298

1,055
8,298
9,353
3,990
5,363
1998200535 years
Brookdale RichlandRichlandWA
960
23,270
365
960
23,635
24,595
6,129
18,466
1990201135 years
Brookdale Park PlaceSpokaneWA
1,622
12,895
345
1,622
13,240
14,862
6,362
8,500
1915200535 years
Brookdale Allenmore ALTacomaWA
620
16,186
947
671
17,082
17,753
4,224
13,529
1997201135 years
Brookdale Allenmore - ILTacomaWA
1,710
3,326
(622)307
4,107
4,414
1,330
3,084
1988201135 years
Brookdale YakimaYakimaWA
860
15,276
119
891
15,364
16,255
4,028
12,227
1998201135 years
Brookdale KenoshaKenoshaWI
551
5,431
3,297
608
8,671
9,279
3,530
5,749
2000200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse MCLa CrosseWI
621
4,056
1,126
621
5,182
5,803
2,317
3,486
2004200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse ALLa CrosseWI
644
5,831
2,637
644
8,468
9,112
3,662
5,450
1998200535 years
Brookdale Middleton Century AveMiddletonWI
360
5,041

360
5,041
5,401
1,313
4,088
1997201135 years
Brookdale OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
250
4,949

250
4,949
5,199
1,282
3,917
1995201135 years
Brookdale Sun PrairieSun PrairieWI
350
1,131

350
1,131
1,481
355
1,126
1994201135 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  48,497
181,975
1,735,803
113,805
180,918
1,850,665
2,031,583
743,816
1,287,767
   
SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES             
Sunrise of ChandlerChandlerAZ
4,344
14,455
1,293
4,459
15,633
20,092
4,200
15,892
2007201235 years
Sunrise of ScottsdaleScottsdaleAZ
2,229
27,575
1,046
2,255
28,595
30,850
10,733
20,117
2007200735 years
Sunrise at River RoadTucsonAZ
2,971
12,399
806
3,000
13,176
16,176
3,327
12,849
2008201235 years
Sunrise at La CostaCarlsbadCA
4,890
20,590
1,970
5,030
22,420
27,450
8,896
18,554
1999200735 years
Sunrise of CarmichaelCarmichaelCA
1,269
14,598
1,065
1,291
15,641
16,932
3,971
12,961
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Fair OaksFair OaksCA
1,456
23,679
2,730
2,515
25,350
27,865
9,708
18,157
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA
3,802
24,560
2,158
3,889
26,631
30,520
10,243
20,277
1998200735 years
Sunrise at Canyon CrestRiversideCA
5,486
19,658
2,479
5,745
21,878
27,623
8,608
19,015
2006200735 years
Sunrise of RocklinRocklinCA
1,378
23,565
1,817
1,525
25,235
26,760
9,543
17,217
2007200735 years
Sunrise of San MateoSan MateoCA
2,682
35,335
3,325
2,742
38,600
41,342
14,225
27,117
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
2,933
34,361
2,224
2,969
36,549
39,518
13,567
25,951
2000200735 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise at Sterling CanyonValenciaCA
3,868
29,293
5,046
4,084
34,123
38,207
14,006
24,201
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Westlake VillageWestlake VillageCA
4,935
30,722
2,142
5,031
32,768
37,799
12,266
25,533
2004200735 years
Sunrise at Yorba LindaYorba LindaCA
1,689
25,240
2,591
1,780
27,740
29,520
10,522
18,998
2002200735 years
Sunrise at Cherry CreekDenverCO
1,621
28,370
3,585
1,721
31,855
33,576
11,626
21,950
2000200735 years
Sunrise at PinehurstDenverCO
1,417
30,885
2,123
1,653
32,772
34,425
12,833
21,592
1998200735 years
Sunrise at OrchardLittletonCO
1,813
22,183
3,296
1,853
25,439
27,292
9,441
17,851
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WestminsterWestminsterCO
2,649
16,243
2,280
2,847
18,325
21,172
7,266
13,906
2000200735 years
Sunrise of StamfordStamfordCT
4,612
28,533
3,330
5,029
31,446
36,475
12,098
24,377
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFL
2,390
17,671
1,306
2,420
18,947
21,367
4,630
16,737
2009201235 years
Sunrise at Ivey RidgeAlpharettaGA
1,507
18,516
1,498
1,517
20,004
21,521
7,873
13,648
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff Summit IAtlantaGA
4,232
66,161
19,554
4,201
85,746
89,947
36,411
53,536
1987200735 years
Sunrise at Huntcliff Summit IIAtlantaGA
2,154
17,137
3,279
2,160
20,410
22,570
7,772
14,798
1998200735 years
Sunrise at East CobbMariettaGA
1,797
23,420
1,441
1,806
24,852
26,658
9,729
16,929
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BarringtonBarringtonIL
859
15,085
846
892
15,898
16,790
4,117
12,673
2007201235 years
Sunrise of BloomingdaleBloomingdaleIL
1,287
38,625
2,261
1,382
40,791
42,173
15,561
26,612
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Buffalo GroveBuffalo GroveIL
2,154
28,021
1,760
2,339
29,596
31,935
11,418
20,517
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Lincoln ParkChicagoIL
3,485
26,687
4,312
3,504
30,980
34,484
10,887
23,597
2003200735 years
Sunrise of NapervilleNapervilleIL
1,946
28,538
2,605
2,624
30,465
33,089
12,100
20,989
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Palos ParkPalos ParkIL
2,363
42,205
1,357
2,416
43,509
45,925
16,551
29,374
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Park RidgePark RidgeIL
5,533
39,557
3,176
5,707
42,559
48,266
16,285
31,981
1998200735 years
Sunrise of WillowbrookWillowbrookIL
1,454
60,738
3,781
2,080
63,893
65,973
22,545
43,428
2000200735 years
Sunrise on Old MeridianCarmelIN
8,550
31,746
1,391
8,581
33,106
41,687
8,389
33,298
2009201235 years
Sunrise of LeawoodLeawoodKS
651
16,401
1,340
878
17,514
18,392
4,365
14,027
2006201235 years
Sunrise of Overland ParkOverland ParkKS
650
11,015
848
807
11,706
12,513
3,187
9,326
2007201235 years
Sunrise of Baton RougeBaton RougeLA
1,212
23,547
2,045
1,382
25,422
26,804
9,698
17,106
2000200735 years
Sunrise of ColumbiaColumbiaMD
1,780
23,083
3,863
1,918
26,808
28,726
10,393
18,333
1996200735 years
Sunrise of RockvilleRockvilleMD
1,039
39,216
2,917
1,075
42,097
43,172
15,758
27,414
1997200735 years
Sunrise of ArlingtonArlingtonMA
86
34,393
1,553
107
35,925
36,032
13,668
22,364
2001200735 years
Sunrise of NorwoodNorwoodMA
2,230
30,968
2,326
2,356
33,168
35,524
12,608
22,916
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BloomfieldBloomfield HillsMI
3,736
27,657
2,370
3,929
29,834
33,763
11,247
22,516
2006200735 years
Sunrise of CascadeGrand RapidsMI
1,273
21,782
873
1,370
22,558
23,928
5,657
18,271
2007201235 years
Sunrise of NorthvillePlymouthMI
1,445
26,090
1,903
1,525
27,913
29,438
10,680
18,758
1999200735 years
Sunrise of RochesterRochesterMI
2,774
38,666
1,898
2,854
40,484
43,338
15,372
27,966
1998200735 years
Sunrise of TroyTroyMI
1,758
23,727
2,325
1,860
25,950
27,810
9,504
18,306
2001200735 years
Sunrise of EdinaEdinaMN
3,181
24,224
3,752
3,305
27,852
31,157
10,600
20,557
1999200735 years
Sunrise of East BrunswickEast BrunswickNJ
2,784
26,173
2,513
3,030
28,440
31,470
11,253
20,217
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonJacksonNJ
4,009
15,029
965
4,013
15,990
20,003
4,242
15,761
2008201235 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Morris PlainsMorris PlainsNJ
1,492
32,052
2,852
1,601
34,795
36,396
13,226
23,170
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Old TappanOld TappanNJ
2,985
36,795
3,284
3,177
39,887
43,064
14,833
28,231
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WallWall TownshipNJ
1,053
19,101
2,232
1,088
21,298
22,386
8,195
14,191
1999200735 years
Sunrise of WayneWayneNJ
1,288
24,990
3,399
1,373
28,304
29,677
10,783
18,894
1996200735 years
Sunrise of WestfieldWestfieldNJ
5,057
23,803
3,108
5,185
26,783
31,968
10,205
21,763
1996200735 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff LakeWoodcliff LakeNJ
3,493
30,801
2,738
3,692
33,340
37,032
12,633
24,399
2000200735 years
Sunrise of North LynbrookLynbrookNY
4,622
38,087
2,945
4,700
40,954
45,654
15,709
29,945
1999200735 years
Sunrise at FleetwoodMount VernonNY
4,381
28,434
2,802
4,646
30,971
35,617
12,297
23,320
1999200735 years
Sunrise of New CityNew CityNY
1,906
27,323
2,623
1,995
29,857
31,852
11,316
20,536
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SmithtownSmithtownNY
2,853
25,621
3,346
3,040
28,780
31,820
11,551
20,269
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Staten IslandStaten IslandNY
7,237
23,910
1,628
7,292
25,483
32,775
12,542
20,233
2006200735 years
Sunrise on ProvidenceCharlotteNC
1,976
19,472
2,856
1,988
22,316
24,304
8,726
15,578
1999200735 years
Sunrise at North HillsRaleighNC
749
37,091
5,448
849
42,439
43,288
16,851
26,437
2000200735 years
Sunrise at ParmaClevelandOH
695
16,641
1,426
908
17,854
18,762
7,064
11,698
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga FallsCuyahoga FallsOH
626
10,239
2,061
862
12,064
12,926
4,852
8,074
2000200735 years
Sunrise of AbingtonAbingtonPA
1,838
53,660
6,417
2,070
59,845
61,915
22,689
39,226
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Blue BellBlue BellPA
1,765
23,920
3,658
1,928
27,415
29,343
10,759
18,584
2006200735 years
Sunrise of ExtonExtonPA
1,123
17,765
2,304
1,209
19,983
21,192
7,821
13,371
2000200735 years
Sunrise of HaverfordHaverfordPA
941
25,872
2,510
990
28,333
29,323
11,004
18,319
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Granite RunMediaPA
1,272
31,781
2,576
1,428
34,201
35,629
13,112
22,517
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lower MakefieldMorrisvillePA
3,165
21,337
890
3,174
22,218
25,392
5,775
19,617
2008201235 years
Sunrise of WesttownWest ChesterPA
1,547
22,996
2,041
1,576
25,008
26,584
10,038
16,546
1999200735 years
Sunrise of HillcrestDallasTX
2,616
27,680
1,373
2,626
29,043
31,669
11,003
20,666
2006200735 years
Sunrise of Fort WorthFort WorthTX
2,024
18,587
1,067
2,178
19,500
21,678
5,146
16,532
2007201235 years
Sunrise of FriscoFriscoTX
2,523
14,547
783
2,561
15,292
17,853
3,703
14,150
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Cinco RanchKatyTX
2,512
21,600
1,478
2,580
23,010
25,590
5,929
19,661
2007201235 years
Sunrise at HolladayHolladayUT
2,542
44,771
1,265
2,581
45,997
48,578
11,480
37,098
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SandySandyUT
2,576
22,987
400
2,646
23,317
25,963
8,931
17,032
2007200735 years
Sunrise of AlexandriaAlexandriaVA
88
14,811
3,356
244
18,011
18,255
7,025
11,230
1998200735 years
Sunrise of RichmondRichmondVA
1,120
17,446
1,304
1,224
18,646
19,870
7,519
12,351
1999200735 years
Sunrise at Bon AirRichmondVA
2,047
22,079
1,134
2,032
23,228
25,260
6,009
19,251
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SpringfieldSpringfieldVA
4,440
18,834
2,758
4,545
21,487
26,032
8,588
17,444
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lynn ValleyVancouverBC
11,759
37,424
(8,961)9,181
31,041
40,222
11,752
28,470
2002200735 years
Sunrise of VancouverVancouverBC
6,649
31,937
1,826
6,662
33,750
40,412
12,785
27,627
2005200735 years
Sunrise of VictoriaVictoriaBC
8,332
29,970
(6,020)6,592
25,690
32,282
9,827
22,455
2001200735 years
Sunrise of AuroraAuroraON
1,570
36,113
(7,197)1,320
29,166
30,486
10,996
19,490
2002200735 years
Sunrise of BurlingtonBurlingtonON
1,173
24,448
1,497
1,378
25,740
27,118
9,914
17,204
2001200735 years
Sunrise of UnionvilleMarkhamON
2,322
41,140
(8,004)1,964
33,494
35,458
12,836
22,622
2000200735 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of MississaugaMississaugaON
3,554
33,631
(6,617)2,918
27,650
30,568
10,765
19,803
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Erin MillsMississaugaON
1,957
27,020
(5,211)1,542
22,224
23,766
8,487
15,279
2007200735 years
Sunrise of OakvilleOakvilleON
2,753
37,489
2,135
2,925
39,452
42,377
14,965
27,412
2002200735 years
Sunrise of Richmond HillRichmond HillON
2,155
41,254
(8,249)1,834
33,326
35,160
12,766
22,394
2002200735 years
Sunrise of ThornhillVaughanON
2,563
57,513
(9,944)1,473
48,659
50,132
17,150
32,982
2003200735 years
Sunrise of WindsorWindsorON
1,813
20,882
1,962
1,996
22,661
24,657
8,642
16,015
2001200735 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  
245,515
2,532,176
150,643
249,229
2,679,105
2,928,334
987,778
1,940,556
   
ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Atria RegencyMobileAL
950
11,897
1,741
981
13,607
14,588
4,804
9,784
1996201135 years
Atria Chandler VillasChandlerAZ
3,650
8,450
2,564
3,769
10,895
14,664
4,554
10,110
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Sierra PointeScottsdaleAZ
10,930
65,372
5,722
11,021
71,003
82,024
13,658
68,366
2000201435 years
Atria Campana del RioTucsonAZ
5,861
37,284
3,355
5,992
40,508
46,500
13,191
33,309
1964201135 years
Atria Valley ManorTucsonAZ
1,709
60
1,024
1,768
1,025
2,793
650
2,143
1963201135 years
Atria Bell Court GardensTucsonAZ
3,010
30,969
2,535
3,060
33,454
36,514
10,012
26,502
1964201135 years
Atria BurlingameBurlingameCA
2,494
12,373
1,874
2,579
14,162
16,741
4,790
11,951
1977201135 years
Atria Las PosasCamarilloCA
4,500
28,436
1,450
4,539
29,847
34,386
8,861
25,525
1997201135 years
Atria Carmichael OaksCarmichaelCA17,263
2,118
49,694
3,337
2,300
52,849
55,149
12,869
42,280
1992201335 years
Atria El Camino GardensCarmichaelCA
6,930
32,318
15,725
7,215
47,758
54,973
16,341
38,632
1984201135 years
Villa BonitaChula VistaCA
2,700
7,994
1,006
1,610
10,090
11,700
2,512
9,188
1989201135 years
Atria CovinaCovinaCA
170
4,131
955
262
4,994
5,256
1,968
3,288
1977201135 years
Atria Daly CityDaly CityCA
3,090
13,448
1,326
3,102
14,762
17,864
4,786
13,078
1975201135 years
Atria Covell GardensDavisCA
2,163
39,657
12,793
2,388
52,225
54,613
18,123
36,490
1987201135 years
Atria EncinitasEncinitasCA
5,880
9,212
3,219
5,952
12,359
18,311
3,985
14,326
1984201135 years
Atria North EscondidoEscondidoCA
1,196
7,155
734
1,215
7,870
9,085
1,939
7,146
2002201435 years
Atria Grass ValleyGrass ValleyCA10,741
1,965
28,414
1,651
2,020
30,010
32,030
7,346
24,684
2000201335 years
Atria Golden CreekIrvineCA
6,900
23,544
3,122
6,930
26,636
33,566
8,267
25,299
1985201135 years
Atria Park of LafayetteLafayetteCA18,127
5,679
56,922
2,213
6,416
58,398
64,814
13,477
51,337
2007201335 years
Atria Del SolMission ViejoCA
3,500
12,458
8,751
3,785
20,924
24,709
8,582
16,127
1985201135 years
Atria Newport PlazaNewport BeachCA
4,534
32,912
1,282
4,569
34,159
38,728
2,339
36,389
1989201735 years
Atria Tamalpais CreekNovatoCA
5,812
24,703
1,236
5,838
25,913
31,751
7,797
23,954
1978201135 years
Atria Park of Pacific PalisadesPacific PalisadesCA
4,458
17,064
1,536
4,489
18,569
23,058
7,552
15,506
2001200735 years
Atria Palm DesertPalm DesertCA
2,887
9,843
1,563
3,127
11,166
14,293
5,822
8,471
1988201135 years
Atria HaciendaPalm DesertCA
6,680
85,900
3,914
6,876
89,618
96,494
25,338
71,156
1989201135 years
Atria ParadiseParadiseCA
2,265
28,262
(22,641)1,995
5,891
7,886
6,203
1,683
1999201335 years
Atria Del ReyRancho CucamongaCA
3,290
17,427
5,938
3,477
23,178
26,655
9,450
17,205
1987201135 years
Mission HillsRancho MirageCA
1,610
9,169
452
6,800
4,431
11,231
1,373
9,858
1996201435 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria RocklinRocklinCA18,336
4,427
52,064
1,595
4,473
53,613
58,086
9,383
48,703
2001201535 years
Atria La JollaSan DiegoCA
8,210
46,315
(1,197)8,216
45,112
53,328
3,142
50,186
1984201735 years
Atria PenasquitosSan DiegoCA
2,649
24,067
2,254
2,711
26,259
28,970
1,781
27,189
1991201735 years
Atria CollwoodSan DiegoCA
290
10,650
1,469
347
12,062
12,409
4,175
8,234
1976201135 years
Atria Rancho ParkSan DimasCA
4,066
14,306
2,248
4,625
15,995
20,620
5,898
14,722
1975201135 years
Regency of Evergreen ValleySan JoseCA
6,800
3,637
1,119
2,700
8,856
11,556
2,719
8,837
1998201135 years
Atria Willow GlenSan JoseCA
8,521
43,168
3,745
8,627
46,807
55,434
12,675
42,759
1976201135 years
Atria San JuanSan Juan CapistranoCA
5,110
29,436
9,015
5,353
38,208
43,561
15,626
27,935
1985201135 years
Atria HillsdaleSan MateoCA
5,240
15,956
25,600
5,253
41,543
46,796
5,245
41,551
1986201135 years
Atria Santa ClaritaSanta ClaritaCA
3,880
38,366
1,738
3,890
40,094
43,984
7,148
36,836
2001201535 years
Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
6,120
30,068
5,355
6,240
35,303
41,543
11,502
30,041
1977201135 years
Atria Park of TarzanaTarzanaCA
960
47,547
6,461
5,861
49,107
54,968
11,112
43,856
2008201335 years
Atria Park of Vintage HillsTemeculaCA
4,674
44,341
3,105
4,892
47,228
52,120
11,793
40,327
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Grand OaksThousand OaksCA
5,994
50,309
1,375
6,055
51,623
57,678
12,479
45,199
2002201335 years
Atria HillcrestThousand OaksCA
6,020
25,635
10,529
6,624
35,560
42,184
14,863
27,321
1987201135 years
Atria Walnut CreekWalnut CreekCA
6,910
15,797
17,518
7,642
32,583
40,225
15,417
24,808
1978201135 years
Atria Valley ViewWalnut CreekCA
7,139
53,914
3,184
7,193
57,044
64,237
24,189
40,048
1977201135 years
Atria LongmontLongmontCO
2,807
24,877
1,425
2,874
26,235
29,109
6,941
22,168
2009201235 years
Atria DarienDarienCT
653
37,587
12,187
1,202
49,225
50,427
16,000
34,427
1997201135 years
Atria Larson PlaceHamdenCT
1,850
16,098
2,463
1,885
18,526
20,411
6,089
14,322
1999201135 years
Atria Greenridge PlaceRocky HillCT
2,170
32,553
2,714
2,392
35,045
37,437
10,170
27,267
1998201135 years
Atria StamfordStamfordCT
1,200
62,432
20,025
1,487
82,170
83,657
22,565
61,092
1975201135 years
Atria Crossroads PlaceWaterfordCT
2,401
36,495
7,988
2,577
44,307
46,884
15,132
31,752
2000201135 years
Atria Hamilton HeightsWest HartfordCT
3,120
14,674
3,933
3,163
18,564
21,727
7,215
14,512
1904201135 years
Atria Windsor WoodsHudsonFL
1,610
32,432
3,595
1,744
35,893
37,637
11,173
26,464
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Baypoint VillageHudsonFL
2,083
28,841
9,966
2,369
38,521
40,890
13,623
27,267
1986201135 years
Atria Park of San PabloJacksonvilleFL
1,620
14,920
1,310
1,660
16,190
17,850
4,918
12,932
1999201135 years
Atria Park of St. Joseph'sJupiterFL
5,520
30,720
2,129
5,575
32,794
38,369
8,105
30,264
2007201335 years
Atria Lady LakeLady LakeFL
3,752
26,265
1,519
3,769
27,767
31,536
4,811
26,725
2010201535 years
Atria Park of Lake ForestSanfordFL
3,589
32,586
5,340
4,104
37,411
41,515
11,140
30,375
2002201135 years
Atria Evergreen WoodsSpring HillFL
2,370
28,371
6,077
2,568
34,250
36,818
11,532
25,286
1981201135 years
Atria North PointAlpharettaGA38,576
4,830
78,318
3,260
4,868
81,540
86,408
16,947
69,461
2007201435 years
Atria BuckheadAtlantaGA
3,660
5,274
1,449
3,688
6,695
10,383
2,713
7,670
1996201135 years
Atria Park of TuckerTuckerGA
1,103
20,679
790
1,120
21,452
22,572
5,292
17,280
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Glen EllynGlen EllynIL
2,455
34,064
3,293
2,748
37,064
39,812
14,328
25,484
2000200735 years
Atria NewburghNewburghIN
1,150
22,880
1,612
1,155
24,487
25,642
6,899
18,743
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone EastTopekaKS
1,150
20,544
1,625
1,241
22,078
23,319
6,825
16,494
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone WestTopekaKS
1,230
28,379
2,552
1,267
30,894
32,161
10,075
22,086
1987201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Highland CrossingCovingtonKY
1,677
14,393
1,773
1,693
16,150
17,843
5,713
12,130
1988201135 years
Atria Summit HillsCrestview HillsKY
1,780
15,769
1,270
1,812
17,007
18,819
5,437
13,382
1998201135 years
Atria ElizabethtownElizabethtownKY
850
12,510
937
884
13,413
14,297
4,111
10,186
1996201135 years
Atria St. MatthewsLouisvilleKY
939
9,274
1,391
968
10,636
11,604
4,228
7,376
1998201135 years
Atria Stony BrookLouisvilleKY
1,860
17,561
1,333
1,953
18,801
20,754
5,959
14,795
1999201135 years
Atria SpringdaleLouisvilleKY
1,410
16,702
1,604
1,451
18,265
19,716
5,737
13,979
1999201135 years
Atria KennebunkKennebunkME
1,090
23,496
1,701
1,159
25,128
26,287
7,591
18,696
1998201135 years
Atria ManresaAnnapolisMD
4,193
19,000
2,311
4,465
21,039
25,504
6,579
18,925
1920201135 years
Atria SalisburySalisburyMD
1,940
24,500
1,391
1,979
25,852
27,831
7,188
20,643
1995201135 years
Atria Marland PlaceAndoverMA
1,831
34,592
19,600
1,996
54,027
56,023
21,944
34,079
1996201135 years
Atria Longmeadow PlaceBurlingtonMA
5,310
58,021
2,123
5,387
60,067
65,454
16,527
48,927
1998201135 years
Atria FairhavenFairhavenMA
1,100
16,093
1,104
1,157
17,140
18,297
5,013
13,284
1999201135 years
Atria Woodbriar PlaceFalmouthMA
4,630
27,314
5,817
6,433
31,328
37,761
8,712
29,049
2013201335 years
Atria Woodbriar ParkFalmouthMA
1,970
43,693
21,519
2,709
64,473
67,182
20,248
46,934
1975201135 years
Atria Draper PlaceHopedaleMA
1,140
17,794
1,872
1,234
19,572
20,806
6,014
14,792
1998201135 years
Atria Merrimack PlaceNewburyportMA
2,774
40,645
21,593
4,319
60,693
65,012
11,669
53,343
2000201135 years
Atria Marina PlaceQuincyMA
2,590
33,899
2,109
2,780
35,818
38,598
10,474
28,124
1999201135 years
Atria Park of Ann ArborAnn ArborMI
1,703
15,857
1,998
1,837
17,721
19,558
7,516
12,042
2001200735 years
Atria KinghavenRiverviewMI
1,440
26,260
3,507
1,598
29,609
31,207
9,031
22,176
1987201135 years
Atria SevilleLas VegasNV

796
1,852
14
2,634
2,648
1,888
760
1999201135 years
Atria Summit RidgeRenoNV
4
407
776
20
1,167
1,187
875
312
1997201135 years
Atria CranfordCranfordNJ
8,260
61,411
5,689
8,406
66,954
75,360
20,313
55,047
1993201135 years
Atria Tinton FallsTinton FallsNJ
6,580
13,258
1,835
6,762
14,911
21,673
5,540
16,133
1999201135 years
Atria ShakerAlbanyNY
1,520
29,667
5,279
1,626
34,840
36,466
9,030
27,436
1997201135 years
Atria CrossgateAlbanyNY
1,080
20,599
1,247
1,100
21,826
22,926
6,779
16,147
1980201135 years
Atria WoodlandsArdsleyNY44,386
7,660
65,581
3,248
7,718
68,771
76,489
20,019
56,470
2005201135 years
Atria Bay ShoreBay ShoreNY15,275
4,440
31,983
2,874
4,453
34,844
39,297
10,458
28,839
1900201135 years
Atria Briarcliff ManorBriarcliff ManorNY
6,560
33,885
3,315
6,725
37,035
43,760
11,188
32,572
1997201135 years
Atria RiverdaleBronxNY
1,020
24,149
16,568
1,084
40,653
41,737
15,812
25,925
1999201135 years
Atria Delmar PlaceDelmarNY
1,201
24,850
1,183
1,223
26,011
27,234
5,565
21,669
2004201335 years
Atria East NorthportEast NorthportNY
9,960
34,467
19,987
10,250
54,164
64,414
16,866
47,548
1996201135 years
Atria Glen CoveGlen CoveNY
2,035
25,190
1,400
2,063
26,562
28,625
14,362
14,263
1997201135 years
Atria Great NeckGreat NeckNY
3,390
54,051
28,002
3,482
81,961
85,443
20,008
65,435
1998201135 years
Atria Cutter MillGreat NeckNY
2,750
47,919
3,412
2,761
51,320
54,081
14,422
39,659
1999201135 years
Atria HuntingtonHuntington StationNY
8,190
1,169
2,791
8,232
3,918
12,150
2,849
9,301
1987201135 years
Atria Hertlin PlaceLake RonkonkomaNY
7,886
16,391
2,489
7,889
18,877
26,766
5,333
21,433
2002201235 years
Atria LynbrookLynbrookNY
3,145
5,489
11,416
3,176
16,874
20,050
2,899
17,151
1996201135 years
Atria TanglewoodLynbrookNY23,160
4,120
37,348
1,404
4,145
38,727
42,872
10,867
32,005
2005201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria West 86New YorkNY
80
73,685
7,374
167
80,972
81,139
24,453
56,686
1998201135 years
Atria on the HudsonOssiningNY
8,123
63,089
5,143
8,212
68,143
76,355
21,242
55,113
1972201135 years
Atria PlainviewPlainviewNY
2,480
16,060
2,209
2,630
18,119
20,749
5,802
14,947
2000201135 years
Atria Rye BrookPort ChesterNY
9,660
74,936
2,691
9,751
77,536
87,287
21,846
65,441
2004201135 years
Atria Kew GardensQueensNY
3,051
66,013
9,082
3,079
75,067
78,146
22,113
56,033
1999201135 years
Atria Forest HillsQueensNY
2,050
16,680
2,099
2,074
18,755
20,829
5,754
15,075
2001201135 years
Atria on Roslyn HarborRoslynNY65,000
12,909
72,720
2,969
12,974
75,624
88,598
21,290
67,308
2006201135 years
Atria GuilderlandSlingerlandsNY
1,170
22,414
919
1,171
23,332
24,503
6,760
17,743
1950201135 years
Atria South SetauketSouth SetauketNY
8,450
14,534
2,146
8,842
16,288
25,130
6,816
18,314
1967201135 years
Atria Southpoint WalkDurhamNC
2,130
25,920
1,544
2,135
27,459
29,594
6,864
22,730
2009201335 years
Atria OakridgeRaleighNC
1,482
28,838
1,657
1,519
30,458
31,977
7,684
24,293
2009201335 years
Atria BethlehemBethlehemPA
2,479
22,870
1,141
2,500
23,990
26,490
7,544
18,946
1998201135 years
Atria Center CityPhiladelphiaPA
3,460
18,291
18,257
3,535
36,473
40,008
10,722
29,286
1964201135 years
Atria South HillsPittsburghPA
880
10,884
1,000
913
11,851
12,764
4,088
8,676
1998201135 years
Atria Bay Spring VillageBarringtonRI
2,000
33,400
3,134
2,080
36,454
38,534
11,772
26,762
2000201135 years
Atria HarborhillEast GreenwichRI
2,089
21,702
1,911
2,183
23,519
25,702
7,306
18,396
1835201135 years
Atria Lincoln PlaceLincolnRI
1,440
12,686
1,527
1,475
14,178
15,653
4,894
10,759
2000201135 years
Atria Aquidneck PlacePortsmouthRI
2,810
31,623
1,212
2,814
32,831
35,645
9,159
26,486
1999201135 years
Atria Forest LakeColumbiaSC
670
13,946
1,117
691
15,042
15,733
4,471
11,262
1999201135 years
Atria Weston PlaceKnoxvilleTN
793
7,961
1,629
969
9,414
10,383
3,179
7,204
1993201135 years
Atria at the ArboretumAustinTX
8,280
61,764
3,477
8,377
65,144
73,521
15,854
57,667
2009201235 years
Atria CarrolltonCarrolltonTX5,519
360
20,465
1,823
370
22,278
22,648
6,829
15,819
1998201135 years
Atria GrapevineGrapevineTX
2,070
23,104
2,039
2,092
25,121
27,213
7,161
20,052
1999201135 years
Atria WestchaseHoustonTX
2,318
22,278
1,546
2,347
23,795
26,142
7,239
18,903
1999201135 years
Atria Cinco RanchKatyTX
3,171
73,287
2,081
3,201
75,338
78,539
12,222
66,317
2010201535 years
Atria KingwoodKingwoodTX
1,170
4,518
1,064
1,192
5,560
6,752
2,133
4,619
1998201135 years
Atria at HometownNorth Richland HillsTX
1,932
30,382
2,738
1,963
33,089
35,052
8,400
26,652
2007201335 years
Atria Canyon CreekPlanoTX
3,110
45,999
3,756
3,148
49,717
52,865
12,573
40,292
2009201335 years
Atria CypresswoodSpringTX
880
9,192
648
984
9,736
10,720
3,282
7,438
1996201135 years
Atria Sugar LandSugar LandTX
970
17,542
1,059
980
18,591
19,571
5,602
13,969
1999201135 years
Atria CopelandTylerTX
1,879
17,901
2,178
1,913
20,045
21,958
5,975
15,983
1997201135 years
Atria Willow ParkTylerTX
920
31,271
1,862
982
33,071
34,053
9,988
24,065
1985201135 years
Atria Virginia BeachVirginia BeachVA
1,749
33,004
1,041
1,815
33,979
35,794
10,062
25,732
1998201135 years
Arbour LakeCalgaryAB
2,512
39,188
(3,182)2,259
36,259
38,518
6,991
31,527
2003201435 years
Canyon MeadowsCalgaryAB
1,617
30,803
(2,148)1,453
28,819
30,272
5,786
24,486
1995201435 years
Churchill ManorEdmontonAB
2,865
30,482
(2,556)2,575
28,216
30,791
5,660
25,131
1999201435 years
The View at LethbridgeLethbridgeAB
2,503
24,770
(2,185)2,261
22,827
25,088
4,933
20,155
2007201435 years
Victoria ParkRed DeerAB
1,188
22,554
(808)1,066
21,868
22,934
4,671
18,263
1999201435 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Ironwood EstatesSt. AlbertAB
3,639
22,519
(1,093)3,294
21,771
25,065
4,692
20,373
1998201435 years
Longlake ChateauNanaimoBC
1,874
22,910
(1,333)1,683
21,768
23,451
4,777
18,674
1990201435 years
Prince George ChateauPrince GeorgeBC
2,066
22,761
(1,309)1,853
21,665
23,518
4,592
18,926
2005201435 years
The VictorianVictoriaBC
3,419
16,351
(610)3,083
16,077
19,160
3,697
15,463
1988201435 years
The Victorian at McKenzieVictoriaBC
4,801
25,712
(1,349)4,307
24,857
29,164
5,219
23,945
2003201435 years
Riverheights TerraceBrandonMB
799
27,708
(1,386)716
26,405
27,121
5,457
21,664
2001201435 years
Amber MeadowWinnipegMB
3,047
17,821
(512)2,728
17,628
20,356
4,332
16,024
2000201435 years
The WesthavenWinnipegMB
871
23,162
(842)813
22,378
23,191
4,665
18,526
1988201435 years
Ste. Anne's CourtFrederictonNB
1,221
29,626
(1,895)1,107
27,845
28,952
5,713
23,239
2002201435 years
Chateau de ChamplainSt. JohnNB
796
24,577
(932)732
23,709
24,441
5,124
19,317
2002201435 years
The Court at BrooklinBrooklinON
2,515
35,602
(2,128)2,279
33,710
35,989
6,613
29,376
2004201435 years
Burlington GardensBurlingtonON
7,560
50,744
(4,488)6,788
47,028
53,816
8,789
45,027
2008201435 years
The Court at RushdaleHamiltonON
1,799
34,633
(2,280)1,610
32,542
34,152
6,482
27,670
2004201435 years
Kingsdale ChateauKingstonON
2,221
36,272
(2,300)2,055
34,138
36,193
6,759
29,434
2000201435 years
The Court at BarrhavenNepeanON
1,778
33,922
(2,049)1,652
31,999
33,651
6,564
27,087
2004201435 years
Crystal View LodgeNepeanON
1,587
37,243
(1,721)1,636
35,473
37,109
6,892
30,217
2000201435 years
Stamford EstatesNiagara FallsON
1,414
29,439
(2,079)1,266
27,508
28,774
5,504
23,270
2005201435 years
Sherbrooke HeightsPeterboroughON
2,485
33,747
(2,073)2,232
31,927
34,159
6,515
27,644
2001201435 years
Anchor PointeSt. CatharinesON
8,214
24,056
(1,676)7,354
23,240
30,594
5,166
25,428
2000201435 years
The Court at Pringle CreekWhitbyON
2,965
39,206
(3,211)2,726
36,234
38,960
7,161
31,799
2002201435 years
La Residence StegerSaint-LaurentQC
1,995
10,926
1,128
1,845
12,204
14,049
3,244
10,805
1999201435 years
Mulberry EstatesMoose JawSK
2,173
31,791
(2,115)2,053
29,796
31,849
6,067
25,782
2003201435 years
Queen Victoria EstatesReginaSK
3,018
34,109
(2,387)2,716
32,024
34,740
6,399
28,341
2000201435 years
Primrose ChateauSaskatoonSK
2,611
32,729
(1,873)2,405
31,062
33,467
6,218
27,249
1996201435 years
AmberwoodPort RicheyFlorida
1,320


1,320

1,320

1,320
N/A2011N/A
Atria Development & Construction Fees  

233


233
233

233
CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  256,383
538,180
4,760,171
511,143
554,121
5,255,373
5,809,494
1,458,754
4,350,740
   
OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Elmcroft of Grayson ValleyBirminghamAL
1,040
19,145
982
1,046
20,121
21,167
5,494
15,673
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Byrd SpringsHunstvilleAL
1,720
11,270
1,279
1,723
12,546
14,269
3,716
10,553
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Heritage WoodsMobileAL
1,020
10,241
999
1,025
11,235
12,260
3,360
8,900
2000201135 years
Rosewood ManorScottsboroAL
680
4,038

680
4,038
4,718
1,084
3,634
1998201135 years
Chandler Memory Care CommunityChandlerAZ
2,910
8,882
184
3,094
8,882
11,976
2,418
9,558
2012201235 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care CommunityGilbertAZ
890
5,918

890
5,918
6,808
1,493
5,315
2012201235 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Prestige Assisted Living at Green ValleyGreen ValleyAZ
1,227
13,977

1,227
13,977
15,204
2,373
12,831
1998201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu CityLake HavasuAZ
594
14,792

594
14,792
15,386
2,496
12,890
1999201435 years
Lakeview TerraceLake Havasu CityAZ
706
7,810
109
706
7,919
8,625
1,451
7,174
2009201535 years
Arbor RoseMesaAZ
1,100
11,880
2,434
1,100
14,314
15,414
5,488
9,926
1999201135 years
The StratfordPhoenixAZ
1,931
33,576
1,207
1,931
34,783
36,714
5,706
31,008
2001201435 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory CareScottsdaleAZ
2,310
6,322
677
2,185
7,124
9,309
1,004
8,305
1986201135 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra VistaSierra VistaAZ
295
13,224

295
13,224
13,519
2,226
11,293
1999201435 years
Rock Creek Memory Care CommunitySurpriseAZ9,876
826
16,353
3
826
16,356
17,182
1,126
16,056
2017201735 years
Elmcroft of TempeTempeAZ
1,090
12,942
1,408
1,098
14,342
15,440
4,257
11,183
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of River CentreTucsonAZ
1,940
5,195
1,179
1,940
6,374
8,314
2,179
6,135
1999201135 years
West ShoresHot SpringsAR
1,326
10,904
1,825
1,326
12,729
14,055
4,958
9,097
1988200535 years
Elmcroft of MaumelleMaumelleAR
1,252
7,601
481
1,258
8,076
9,334
3,004
6,330
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Mountain HomeMountain HomeAR
204
8,971
451
204
9,422
9,626
3,523
6,103
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of SherwoodSherwoodAR
1,320
5,693
513
1,320
6,206
7,526
2,314
5,212
1997200635 years
Sierra Ridge Memory CareAuburnCA
681
6,071

681
6,071
6,752
1,034
5,718
2011201435 years
Careage BanningBanningCA
2,970
16,037

2,970
16,037
19,007
4,548
14,459
2004201135 years
Las Villas Del CarlsbadCarlsbadCA
1,760
30,469
4,661
1,760
35,130
36,890
11,866
25,024
1987200635 years
Prestige Assisted Living at ChicoChicoCA
1,069
14,929

1,069
14,929
15,998
2,529
13,469
1998201435 years
The Meadows Senior LivingElk GroveCA
1,308
19,667

1,308
19,667
20,975
3,293
17,682
2003201435 years
Alder Bay Assisted LivingEurekaCA
1,170
5,228
(70)1,170
5,158
6,328
1,558
4,770
1997201135 years
CedarbrookFresnoCA
1,652
12,613

1,652
12,613
14,265
1,201
13,064
2014201735 years
Elmcroft of La MesaLa MesaCA
2,431
6,101
204
2,431
6,305
8,736
2,343
6,393
1997200635 years
Grossmont GardensLa MesaCA
9,104
59,349
3,198
9,115
62,536
71,651
23,150
48,501
1964200635 years
Palms, TheLa MiradaCA
2,700
43,919

2,700
43,919
46,619
8,939
37,680
1990201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at LancasterLancasterCA
718
10,459

718
10,459
11,177
1,771
9,406
1999201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at MarysvilleMarysvilleCA
741
7,467

741
7,467
8,208
1,270
6,938
1999201435 years
Mountview Retirement ResidenceMontroseCA
1,089
15,449
2,232
1,089
17,681
18,770
5,991
12,779
1974200635 years
Redwood RetirementNapaCA
2,798
12,639

2,798
12,639
15,437
2,620
12,817
1986201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at OrovilleOrovilleCA
638
8,079

638
8,079
8,717
1,370
7,347
1999201435 years
Valencia CommonsRancho CucamongaCA
1,439
36,363

1,439
36,363
37,802
7,382
30,420
2002201335 years
Shasta EstatesReddingCA
1,180
23,463

1,180
23,463
24,643
4,769
19,874
2009201335 years
The VistasReddingCA
1,290
22,033

1,290
22,033
23,323
5,892
17,431
2007201135 years
Elmcroft of Point LomaSan DiegoCA
2,117
6,865
(1,770)6
7,206
7,212
2,659
4,553
1999200635 years
Villa Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCA
1,219
12,426
5,325
1,219
17,751
18,970
5,791
13,179
1977200535 years
Oak Terrace Memory CareSoulsbyvilleCA
1,146
5,275

1,146
5,275
6,421
913
5,508
1999201435 years
Skyline Place Senior LivingSonoraCA
1,815
28,472

1,815
28,472
30,287
4,788
25,499
1996201435 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Eagle Lake VillageSusanvilleCA
1,165
6,719

1,165
6,719
7,884
1,585
6,299
2006201235 years
Bonaventure, TheVenturaCA
5,294
32,747

5,294
32,747
38,041
6,742
31,299
2005201335 years
Sterling InnVictorvilleCA12,558
733
18,564
6,673
733
25,237
25,970
1,712
24,258
1992201735 years
Sterling CommonsVictorvilleCA5,850
768
13,124

768
13,124
13,892
1,206
12,686
1994201735 years
Prestige Assisted Living at VisaliaVisaliaCA
1,300
8,378

1,300
8,378
9,678
1,436
8,242
1998201435 years
Highland TrailBroomfieldCO
2,511
26,431

2,511
26,431
28,942
5,400
23,542
2009201335 years
Caley RidgeEnglewoodCO
1,157
13,133

1,157
13,133
14,290
3,099
11,191
1999201235 years
Garden Square at WestlakeGreeleyCO
630
8,211

630
8,211
8,841
2,278
6,563
1998201135 years
Garden Square of GreeleyGreeleyCO
330
2,735

330
2,735
3,065
767
2,298
1995201135 years
Lakewood EstatesLakewoodCO
1,306
21,137

1,306
21,137
22,443
4,302
18,141
1988201335 years
Sugar Valley EstatesLovelandCO
1,255
21,837

1,255
21,837
23,092
4,442
18,650
2009201335 years
Devonshire AcresSterlingCO
950
10,092
555
965
10,632
11,597
3,097
8,500
1979201135 years
The Hearth at GardensideBranfordCT
7,000
31,518

7,000
31,518
38,518
8,424
30,094
1999201135 years
The Hearth at Tuxis PondMadisonCT
1,610
44,322

1,610
44,322
45,932
11,386
34,546
2002201135 years
White OaksManchesterCT
2,584
34,507

2,584
34,507
37,091
7,034
30,057
2007201335 years
Hampton Manor BelleviewBelleviewFL
390
8,337
100
390
8,437
8,827
2,274
6,553
1988201135 years
Sabal HouseCantonmentFL
430
5,902

430
5,902
6,332
1,585
4,747
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of Coral SpringsCoral SpringsFL
3,280
11,877
2,331
3,280
14,208
17,488
3,527
13,961
1999201135 years
Stanley HouseDefuniak SpringsFL
410
5,659

410
5,659
6,069
1,518
4,551
1999201135 years
Barrington Terrace of Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
2,105
18,190
1,523
2,110
19,708
21,818
3,909
17,909
2001201535 years
The PeninsulaHollywoodFL
3,660
9,122
1,416
3,660
10,538
14,198
3,089
11,109
1972201135 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin ParcJacksonvilleFL
455
5,905
547
455
6,452
6,907
2,410
4,497
1998200635 years
Forsyth HouseMiltonFL
610
6,503

610
6,503
7,113
1,731
5,382
1999201135 years
Barrington Terrace of NaplesNaplesFL
2,596
18,716
1,670
2,610
20,372
22,982
3,702
19,280
2004201535 years
The Carlisle NaplesNaplesFL
8,406
78,091

8,406
78,091
86,497
20,212
66,285
1998201135 years
Naples ALZ DevelopmentNaplesFL
2,983


2,983

2,983

2,983
CIPCIPCIP
Hampton Manor at 24th RoadOcalaFL
690
8,767
121
690
8,888
9,578
2,332
7,246
1996201135 years
Hampton Manor at DeerwoodOcalaFL
790
5,605
3,818
983
9,230
10,213
2,179
8,034
2005201135 years
Las PalmasPalm CoastFL
984
30,009

984
30,009
30,993
6,087
24,906
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of PensacolaPensacolaFL
2,230
2,362
405
2,230
2,767
4,997
872
4,125
1999201135 years
Magnolia HouseQuincyFL
400
5,190

400
5,190
5,590
1,413
4,177
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of TallahasseeTallahasseeFL
2,430
17,745
329
2,430
18,074
20,504
4,779
15,725
1999201135 years
Tallahassee Memory CareTallahasseeFL
640
8,013
71
641
8,083
8,724
1,979
6,745
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of TamaracTamaracFL
3,920
14,130
2,142
3,920
16,272
20,192
4,070
16,122
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of CarrolwoodTampaFL
5,410
20,944
1,761
5,415
22,700
28,115
6,303
21,812
2001201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AthensAthensGA
1,767
16,442
632
1,777
17,064
18,841
3,092
15,749
1998201535 years
Arbor Terrace at CascadeAtlantaGA
3,052
9,040
979
3,057
10,014
13,071
2,589
10,482
1999201535 years
Augusta GardensAugustaGA
530
10,262
308
543
10,557
11,100
2,937
8,163
1997201135 years
Benton House of CovingtonCovingtonGA
1,297
11,397
396
1,298
11,792
13,090
2,238
10,852
2009201535 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Arbor Terrace of DecaturDecaturGA
3,102
19,599
(668)1,298
20,735
22,033
3,681
18,352
1990201535 years
Benton House of DouglasvilleDouglasvilleGA
1,697
15,542
175
1,697
15,717
17,414
2,856
14,558
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of MartinezMartinezGA
408
6,764
825
408
7,589
7,997
2,556
5,441
1997200735 years
Benton House of NewnanNewnanGA
1,474
17,487
299
1,487
17,773
19,260
3,164
16,096
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of RoswellRoswellGA
1,867
15,835
385
1,867
16,220
18,087
2,789
15,298
1997201435 years
Benton Village of StockbridgeStockbridgeGA
2,221
21,989
780
2,232
22,758
24,990
4,224
20,766
2008201535 years
Benton House of Sugar HillSugar HillGA
2,173
14,937
189
2,181
15,118
17,299
2,899
14,400
2010201535 years
Villas of St. James - Breese, ILBreeseIL
671
6,849

671
6,849
7,520
1,437
6,083
2009201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, ILChathamIL
1,185
8,910

1,185
8,910
10,095
1,922
8,173
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, ILEffinghamIL
508
6,624

508
6,624
7,132
1,350
5,782
2011201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, ILHerrinIL
2,175
9,605

2,175
9,605
11,780
2,387
9,393
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, ILMarshallIL
1,461
4,881

1,461
4,881
6,342
1,411
4,931
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, ILNewtonIL
458
4,590

458
4,590
5,048
1,039
4,009
2011201535 years
Rochester Senior Living at WyndcrestRochesterIL
570
6,536
194
570
6,730
7,300
1,375
5,925
2005201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, ILShelbyvilleIL
2,292
3,351

2,292
3,351
5,643
1,552
4,091
2011201535 years
Elmcroft of MuncieMuncieIN
244
11,218
593
277
11,778
12,055
4,204
7,851
1998200735 years
Wood RidgeSouth BendIN
590
4,850
(35)590
4,815
5,405
1,332
4,073
1990201135 years
Elmcroft of Florence (KY)FlorenceKY
1,535
21,826
677
1,544
22,494
24,038
3,845
20,193
2010201435 years
Hartland HillsLexingtonKY
1,468
23,929

1,468
23,929
25,397
4,870
20,527
2001201335 years
Elmcroft of Mount WashingtonMount WashingtonKY
758
12,048
764
758
12,812
13,570
2,214
11,356
2005201435 years
Clover HealthcareAuburnME
1,400
26,895
876
1,400
27,771
29,171
7,825
21,346
1982201135 years
Gorham HouseGorhamME
1,360
33,147
1,472
1,527
34,452
35,979
8,857
27,122
1990201135 years
Kittery EstatesKitteryME
1,531
30,811

1,531
30,811
32,342
6,262
26,080
2009201335 years
Woods at CancoPortlandME
1,441
45,578

1,441
45,578
47,019
9,244
37,775
2000201335 years
Sentry Inn at York HarborYork HarborME
3,490
19,869

3,490
19,869
23,359
5,224
18,135
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of HagerstownHagerstownMD
2,010
1,293
229
1,951
1,581
3,532
562
2,970
1999201135 years
Heritage WoodsAgawamMA
1,249
4,625

1,249
4,625
5,874
2,680
3,194
1997200430 years
Devonshire EstatesLenoxMA
1,832
31,124

1,832
31,124
32,956
6,333
26,623
1998201335 years
Elmcroft of DownriverBrownstown Charter TownshipMI
320
32,652
1,249
371
33,850
34,221
8,860
25,361
2000201135 years
Independence Village of East LansingEast LansingMI
1,956
18,122
398
1,956
18,520
20,476
4,295
16,181
1989201235 years
Primrose AustinAustinMN
2,540
11,707
443
2,540
12,150
14,690
3,150
11,540
2002201135 years
Primrose DuluthDuluthMN
6,190
8,296
257
6,245
8,498
14,743
2,483
12,260
2003201135 years
Primrose MankatoMankatoMN
1,860
8,920
352
1,860
9,272
11,132
2,649
8,483
1999201135 years
Lodge at White BearWhite Bear LakeMN
732
24,999

732
24,999
25,731
5,069
20,662
2002201335 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MOO'FallonMO
2,326
14,158

2,326
14,158
16,484
2,967
13,517
1999201535 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory CareBillingsMT
420
11,217
7
420
11,224
11,644
2,866
8,778
2011201135 years
Spring Creek Inn Alzheimer's CommunityBozemanMT
1,345
16,877

1,345
16,877
18,222
1,598
16,624
2010201735 years
The Springs at MissoulaMissoulaMT15,922
1,975
34,390
2,076
1,975
36,466
38,441
8,444
29,997
2004201235 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Crown PointeOmahaNE
1,316
11,950
2,418
1,316
14,368
15,684
5,397
10,287
1985200535 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira LomaHendersonNV
1,279
12,558

1,279
12,558
13,837
1,584
12,253
1998201635 years
Birch HeightsDerryNH
1,413
30,267

1,413
30,267
31,680
6,150
25,530
2009201335 years
Bear Canyon EstatesAlbuquerqueNM
1,879
36,223

1,879
36,223
38,102
7,364
30,738
1997201335 years
The Woodmark at UptownAlbuquerqueNM
2,439
33,276
1,473
2,471
34,717
37,188
6,055
31,133
2000201535 years
Elmcroft of QuintessenceAlbuquerqueNM
1,150
26,527
1,103
1,165
27,615
28,780
7,317
21,463
1998201135 years
The AmberleighBuffaloNY
3,498
19,097
6,790
3,498
25,887
29,385
8,822
20,563
1988200535 years
Brookdale Battery Park CityNew YorkNY116,100
2,903
186,978
1,100
2,903
188,078
190,981
7,421
183,560
2000201835 years
The Hearth at Castle GardensVestalNY
1,830
20,312
2,230
1,885
22,487
24,372
7,396
16,976
1994201135 years
Elmcroft of AsheboroAsheboroNC
680
15,370
183
680
15,553
16,233
3,758
12,475
1998201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AshevilleAshevilleNC
1,365
15,679
831
1,365
16,510
17,875
3,121
14,754
1998201535 years
Elmcroft of Little AvenueCharlotteNC
250
5,077
441
250
5,518
5,768
2,053
3,715
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Cramer MountainCramertonNC
530
18,225
(67)530
18,158
18,688
4,438
14,250
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HarrisburgHarrisburgNC
1,660
15,130
299
1,660
15,429
17,089
3,710
13,379
1997201135 years
Elmcroft of Hendersonville (NC)HendersonvilleNC
2,210
7,372
55
2,210
7,427
9,637
1,873
7,764
2005201135 years
Elmcroft of HillsboroughHillsboroughNC
1,450
19,754
(56)1,450
19,698
21,148
4,870
16,278
2005201135 years
Willow GroveMatthewsNC
763
27,544

763
27,544
28,307
5,584
22,723
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of NewtonNewtonNC
540
14,935
133
540
15,068
15,608
3,643
11,965
2000201135 years
Independence Village of Olde RaleighRaleighNC
1,989
18,648

1,989
18,648
20,637
4,296
16,341
1991201235 years
Elmcroft of NorthridgeRaleighNC
184
3,592
2,029
207
5,598
5,805
1,666
4,139
1984200635 years
Elmcroft of SalisburySalisburyNC
1,580
25,026
114
1,580
25,140
26,720
6,092
20,628
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of ShelbyShelbyNC
660
15,471
11
660
15,482
16,142
3,797
12,345
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Southern PinesSouthern PinesNC
1,196
10,766
725
1,196
11,491
12,687
3,208
9,479
1998201035 years
Elmcroft of SouthportSouthportNC
1,330
10,356
(17)1,330
10,339
11,669
2,597
9,072
2005201135 years
Primrose BismarckBismarckND
1,210
9,768
255
1,210
10,023
11,233
2,709
8,524
1994201135 years
Wellington ALF - Minot NDMinotND
3,241
9,509

3,241
9,509
12,750
2,465
10,285
2005201535 years
Elmcroft of LimaLimaOH
490
3,368
471
490
3,839
4,329
1,420
2,909
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of OntarioMansfieldOH
523
7,968
426
523
8,394
8,917
3,146
5,771
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of MedinaMedinaOH
661
9,788
626
661
10,414
11,075
3,904
7,171
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of Washington TownshipMiamisburgOH
1,235
12,611
656
1,235
13,267
14,502
4,972
9,530
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore HillsSagamore HillsOH
980
12,604
825
980
13,429
14,409
5,023
9,386
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LorainVermilionOH
500
15,461
1,116
557
16,520
17,077
4,786
12,291
2000201135 years
Gardens at Westlake Senior LivingWestlakeOH
2,401
20,640
623
2,415
21,249
23,664
4,067
19,597
1987201535 years
Elmcroft of XeniaXeniaOH
653
2,801
712
653
3,513
4,166
1,299
2,867
1999200635 years
Arbor House of MustangMustangOK
372
3,587

372
3,587
3,959
808
3,151
1999201235 years
Arbor House of NormanNormanOK
444
7,525

444
7,525
7,969
1,688
6,281
2000201235 years
Arbor House Reminisce CenterNormanOK
438
3,028

438
3,028
3,466
685
2,781
2004201235 years
Arbor House of Midwest CityOklahoma CityOK
544
9,133

544
9,133
9,677
2,049
7,628
2004201235 years
Mansion at WaterfordOklahoma CityOK
2,077
14,184

2,077
14,184
16,261
3,347
12,914
1999201235 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Meadowbrook PlaceBaker CityOR
1,430
5,311

1,430
5,311
6,741
910
5,831
1965201435 years
Edgewood DownsBeavertonOR
2,356
15,476

2,356
15,476
17,832
3,183
14,649
1978201335 years
Princeton Village Assisted LivingClackamasOR2,427
1,126
10,283
92
1,126
10,375
11,501
1,935
9,566
1999201535 years
Bayside Terrace Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
498
2,795
519
498
3,314
3,812
699
3,113
2006201535 years
Ocean Ridge Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
2,681
10,941
23
2,681
10,964
13,645
2,548
11,097
2006201535 years
Avamere at HillsboroHillsboroOR
4,400
8,353
1,413
4,400
9,766
14,166
2,939
11,227
2000201135 years
The Springs at TanasbourneHillsboroOR31,754
4,689
55,035

4,689
55,035
59,724
13,789
45,935
2009201335 years
The Arbor at Avamere CourtKeizerOR
922
6,460
110
1,135
6,357
7,492
1,326
6,166
2012201435 years
Pelican PointeKlamath FallsOR11,128
943
26,237
166
943
26,403
27,346
4,556
22,790
2011201535 years
The StaffordLake OswegoOR
1,800
16,122
802
1,806
16,918
18,724
4,680
14,044
2008201135 years
The Springs at Clackamas WoodsMilwaukieOR14,238
1,264
22,429
3,194
1,381
25,506
26,887
5,574
21,313
1999201235 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted LivingMilwaukieOR7,666
681
12,077

681
12,077
12,758
2,829
9,929
1999201235 years
Pheasant Pointe Assisted LivingMolallaOR
904
7,433
242
904
7,675
8,579
1,324
7,255
1998201535 years
Avamere at NewbergNewbergOR
1,320
4,664
641
1,342
5,283
6,625
1,779
4,846
1999201135 years
Avamere Living at Berry ParkOregon CityOR
1,910
4,249
2,316
1,910
6,565
8,475
2,217
6,258
1972201135 years
McLoughlin Place Senior LivingOregon CityOR
2,418
26,819

2,418
26,819
29,237
4,537
24,700
1997201435 years
Avamere at BethanyPortlandOR
3,150
16,740
257
3,150
16,997
20,147
4,691
15,456
2002201135 years
Cedar Village Assisted LivingSalemOR
868
12,652
19
868
12,671
13,539
2,030
11,509
1999201535 years
Redwood Heights Assisted LivingSalemOR
1,513
16,774
(175)1,513
16,599
18,112
2,657
15,455
1999201535 years
Avamere at SandySandyOR
1,000
7,309
345
1,000
7,654
8,654
2,305
6,349
1999201135 years
Suzanne Elise ALFSeasideOR
1,940
4,027
627
1,945
4,649
6,594
1,490
5,104
1998201135 years
Necanicum VillageSeasideOR
2,212
7,311
270
2,212
7,581
9,793
1,367
8,426
2001201535 years
Avamere at SherwoodSherwoodOR
1,010
7,051
638
1,010
7,689
8,699
2,228
6,471
2000201135 years
Chateau GardensSpringfieldOR
1,550
4,197

1,550
4,197
5,747
1,123
4,624
1991201135 years
Avamere at St HelensSt. HelensOR
1,410
10,496
502
1,410
10,998
12,408
3,195
9,213
2000201135 years
Flagstone Senior LivingThe DallesOR
1,631
17,786

1,631
17,786
19,417
3,003
16,414
1991201435 years
Elmcroft of Allison ParkAllison ParkPA
1,171
5,686
391
1,171
6,077
7,248
2,255
4,993
1986200635 years
Elmcroft of ChippewaBeaver FallsPA
1,394
8,586
519
1,394
9,105
10,499
3,365
7,134
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BerwickBerwickPA
111
6,741
396
111
7,137
7,248
2,642
4,606
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BridgevilleBridgevillePA
1,660
12,624
585
1,660
13,209
14,869
3,294
11,575
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of DillsburgDillsburgPA
432
7,797
543
432
8,340
8,772
3,091
5,681
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of AltoonaDuncansvillePA
331
4,729
540
331
5,269
5,600
1,931
3,669
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonPA
240
7,336
481
249
7,808
8,057
2,926
5,131
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of LewisburgLewisburgPA
232
5,666
512
232
6,178
6,410
2,264
4,146
1999200635 years
Lehigh CommonsMacungiePA
420
4,406
450
420
4,856
5,276
2,895
2,381
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of LoyalsockMontoursvillePA
413
3,412
443
413
3,855
4,268
1,439
2,829
1999200635 years
Highgate at Paoli PointePaoliPA
1,151
9,079

1,151
9,079
10,230
4,933
5,297
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of Mid ValleyPeckvillePA
619
11,662
285
619
11,947
12,566
2,013
10,553
1998201435 years
Sanatoga CourtPottstownPA
360
3,233

360
3,233
3,593
1,807
1,786
1997200430 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Berkshire CommonsReadingPA
470
4,301

470
4,301
4,771
2,401
2,370
1997200430 years
Mifflin CourtReadingPA
689
4,265
351
689
4,616
5,305
2,368
2,937
1997200435 years
Elmcroft of ReadingReadingPA
638
4,942
422
638
5,364
6,002
1,977
4,025
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ReedsvilleReedsvillePA
189
5,170
437
189
5,607
5,796
2,083
3,713
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShippensburgShippensburgPA
203
7,634
514
209
8,142
8,351
3,014
5,337
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of State CollegeState CollegePA
320
7,407
389
320
7,796
8,116
2,912
5,204
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of YorkYorkPA
1,260
6,923
232
1,260
7,155
8,415
1,810
6,605
1999201135 years
The Garden HouseAndersonSC
969
15,613
236
974
15,844
16,818
2,933
13,885
2000201535 years
Forest PinesColumbiaSC
1,058
27,471

1,058
27,471
28,529
5,576
22,953
1998201335 years
Elmcroft of Florence SCFlorenceSC
108
7,620
1,095
122
8,701
8,823
3,283
5,540
1998200635 years
Carolina Gardens at Garden CityMurrells InletSC
1,095
8,618

1,095
8,618
9,713
27
9,686
1999201935 years
Carolina Gardens at Rock HillRock HillSC
790
9,568

790
9,568
10,358
30
10,328
2008201935 years
Primrose AberdeenAberdeenSD
850
659
235
850
894
1,744
472
1,272
1991201135 years
Primrose PlaceAberdeenSD
310
3,242
53
310
3,295
3,605
912
2,693
2000201135 years
Primrose Rapid CityRapid CitySD
860
8,722
88
860
8,810
9,670
2,446
7,224
1997201135 years
Primrose Sioux FallsSioux FallsSD
2,180
12,936
315
2,180
13,251
15,431
3,731
11,700
2002201135 years
Elmcroft of BristolBristolTN
470
16,006
411
470
16,417
16,887
4,014
12,873
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton PlaceChattanoogaTN
87
4,248
494
87
4,742
4,829
1,763
3,066
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShallowfordChattanoogaTN
580
7,568
1,070
585
8,633
9,218
2,781
6,437
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleTN
600
5,304
836
600
6,140
6,740
1,054
5,686
1999201435 years
Regency HouseHixsonTN
140
6,611

140
6,611
6,751
1,764
4,987
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of JacksonJacksonTN
768
16,840
885
786
17,707
18,493
3,027
15,466
1998201435 years
Elmcroft of Johnson CityJohnson CityTN
590
10,043
372
601
10,404
11,005
2,552
8,453
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of KingsportKingsportTN
22
7,815
571
22
8,386
8,408
3,117
5,291
2000200635 years
Arbor Terrace of KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
590
15,862
1,009
590
16,871
17,461
3,176
14,285
1997201535 years
Elmcroft of West KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
439
10,697
862
456
11,542
11,998
4,321
7,677
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of HallsKnoxvilleTN
387
4,948
506
387
5,454
5,841
958
4,883
1998201435 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonTN
180
7,086
1,098
200
8,164
8,364
3,077
5,287
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of BartlettMemphisTN
570
25,552
1,073
570
26,625
27,195
7,054
20,141
1999201135 years
Kennington PlaceMemphisTN
1,820
4,748
815
1,820
5,563
7,383
2,467
4,916
1989201135 years
The GlenmaryMemphisTN
510
5,860
3,124
510
8,984
9,494
2,624
6,870
1964201135 years
Elmcroft of MurfreesboroMurfreesboroTN
940
8,030
228
940
8,258
9,198
2,044
7,154
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of BrentwoodNashvilleTN
960
22,020
1,807
973
23,814
24,787
6,449
18,338
1998201135 years
Elmcroft of ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,650
14,060
1,038
2,654
15,094
17,748
4,406
13,342
1998201135 years
Meadowbrook ALZArlingtonTX
755
4,677
940
755
5,617
6,372
1,250
5,122
2012201235 years
Elmcroft of AustinAustinTX
2,770
25,820
1,274
2,770
27,094
29,864
7,345
22,519
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of BedfordBedfordTX
770
19,691
1,554
770
21,245
22,015
5,885
16,130
1999201135 years
Highland EstatesCedar ParkTX
1,679
28,943

1,679
28,943
30,622
5,888
24,734
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of RivershireConroeTX
860
32,671
1,163
860
33,834
34,694
9,074
25,620
1997201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Flower MoundFlower MoundTX
900
5,512

900
5,512
6,412
1,499
4,913
1995201135 years
Bridgewater Memory CareGranburyTX
390
8,186

390
8,186
8,576
1,834
6,742
2007201235 years
Copperfield EstatesHoustonTX
1,216
21,135

1,216
21,135
22,351
4,299
18,052
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of BraeswoodHoustonTX
3,970
15,919
1,417
3,970
17,336
21,306
4,942
16,364
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Cy-FairHoustonTX
1,580
21,801
1,358
1,593
23,146
24,739
6,213
18,526
1998201135 years
Whitley PlaceKellerTX

5,100
773

5,873
5,873
1,902
3,971
1998200835 years
Elmcroft of Lake JacksonLake JacksonTX
710
14,765
1,209
710
15,974
16,684
4,462
12,222
1998201135 years
Polo Park EstatesMidlandTX
765
29,447

765
29,447
30,212
5,969
24,243
1996201335 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care CommunityPlanoTX
1,014
5,719

1,014
5,719
6,733
1,206
5,527
2013201335 years
Lakeshore Assisted Living and Memory CareRockwallTX
1,537
12,883

1,537
12,883
14,420
2,908
11,512
2009201235 years
Elmcroft of WindcrestSan AntonioTX
920
13,011
1,058
925
14,064
14,989
4,144
10,845
1999201135 years
Paradise SpringsSpringTX
1,488
24,556

1,488
24,556
26,044
4,997
21,047
2008201335 years
Canyon Creek Memory CareTempleTX
473
6,750

473
6,750
7,223
1,516
5,707
2008201235 years
Elmcroft of CottonwoodTempleTX
630
17,515
1,005
630
18,520
19,150
5,101
14,049
1997201135 years
Elmcroft of MainlandTexas CityTX
520
14,849
1,273
523
16,119
16,642
4,533
12,109
1996201135 years
Elmcroft of VictoriaVictoriaTX
440
13,040
1,182
446
14,216
14,662
3,996
10,666
1997201135 years
Windsor Court Senior LivingWeatherfordTX
233
3,347

233
3,347
3,580
752
2,828
1994201235 years
Elmcroft of WhartonWhartonTX
320
13,799
1,011
320
14,810
15,130
4,340
10,790
1996201135 years
Mountain RidgeSouth OgdenUT
1,243
24,659
99
1,243
24,758
26,001
4,140
21,861
2001201435 years
Elmcroft of ChesterfieldRichmondVA
829
6,534
556
836
7,083
7,919
2,639
5,280
1999200635 years
Pheasant RidgeRoanokeVA
1,813
9,027

1,813
9,027
10,840
2,130
8,710
1999201235 years
Cascade Valley Senior LivingArlingtonWA
1,413
6,294

1,413
6,294
7,707
1,059
6,648
1995201435 years
The Bellingham at OrchardBellinghamWA
3,383
17,553
(10)3,381
17,545
20,926
2,684
18,242
1999201535 years
Bay Pointe RetirementBremertonWA
2,114
21,006
(23)2,114
20,983
23,097
3,160
19,937
1999201535 years
Edmonds LandingEdmondsWA
4,273
27,852
(188)4,273
27,664
31,937
4,029
27,908
2001201535 years
The Terrace at Beverly LakeEverettWA
1,515
12,520
35
1,514
12,556
14,070
1,902
12,168
1998201535 years
Madison HouseKirklandWA
4,291
26,787
782
4,351
27,509
31,860
2,596
29,264
1978201735 years
Delaware PlazaLongviewWA4,021
620
5,116
136
815
5,057
5,872
582
5,290
1972201735 years
Canterbury GardensLongviewWA5,451
444
13,715
157
444
13,872
14,316
1,300
13,016
1998201735 years
Canterbury InnLongviewWA14,568
1,462
34,664
837
1,462
35,501
36,963
3,317
33,646
1989201735 years
Canterbury ParkLongviewWA
969
30,109

969
30,109
31,078
2,836
28,242
2000201735 years
Bishop Place Senior LivingPullmanWA
1,780
33,608

1,780
33,608
35,388
5,556
29,832
1998201435 years
Willow GardensPuyallupWA
1,959
35,492

1,959
35,492
37,451
7,218
30,233
1996201335 years
Clearwater SpringsVancouverWA
1,269
9,840
(126)1,269
9,714
10,983
1,599
9,384
2003201535 years
Cascade InnVancouverWA12,378
3,201
19,024
2,321
3,527
21,019
24,546
2,263
22,283
1979201735 years
The Hampton & Ashley InnVancouverWA
1,855
21,047

1,855
21,047
22,902
1,974
20,928
1992201735 years
The Hampton at Salmon CreekVancouverWA11,636
1,256
21,686

1,256
21,686
22,942
1,852
21,090
2013201735 years
Elmcroft of Teays ValleyHurricaneWV
1,950
14,489
365
1,955
14,849
16,804
3,657
13,147
1999201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of MartinsburgMartinsburgWV
248
8,320
699
248
9,019
9,267
3,315
5,952
1999200635 years
Matthews of Appleton IAppletonWI
130
1,834
(41)130
1,793
1,923
527
1,396
1996201135 years
Matthews of Appleton IIAppletonWI
140
2,016
301
140
2,317
2,457
651
1,806
1997201135 years
Hunters RidgeBeaver DamWI
260
2,380

260
2,380
2,640
667
1,973
1998201135 years
Azura Memory Care of BeloitBeloitWI
150
4,356
427
191
4,742
4,933
1,202
3,731
1990201135 years
Azura Memory Care of ClintonClintonWI
290
4,390

290
4,390
4,680
1,147
3,533
1991201135 years
CreeksideCudahyWI
760
1,693

760
1,693
2,453
509
1,944
2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Eau ClaireEau ClaireWI
210
6,259

210
6,259
6,469
1,609
4,860
1996201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Eau Claire IIEau ClaireWI
1,188
6,654

1,188
6,654
7,842
201
7,641
2019201935 years
Chapel ValleyFitchburgWI
450
2,372

450
2,372
2,822
673
2,149
1998201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IIFox PointWI
1,810
943
37
1,820
970
2,790
397
2,393
1999201135 years
Laurel OaksGlendaleWI
2,390
43,587
5,130
2,510
48,597
51,107
12,828
38,279
1988201135 years
Layton TerraceGreenfieldWI
3,490
39,201
566
3,480
39,777
43,257
10,562
32,695
1999201135 years
Matthews of HartlandHartlandWI
640
1,663
43
652
1,694
2,346
601
1,745
1985201135 years
Matthews of HoriconHoriconWI
340
3,327
(95)345
3,227
3,572
1,018
2,554
2002201135 years
JeffersonJeffersonWI
330
2,384

330
2,384
2,714
668
2,046
1997201135 years
Azura Memory Care of KenoshaKenoshaWI
710
3,254
3,765
1,165
6,564
7,729
1,656
6,073
1996201135 years
Azura Memory Care of ManitowocManitowocWI
140
1,520

140
1,520
1,660
418
1,242
1997201135 years
The ArboretumMenomonee FallsWI
5,640
49,083
2,158
5,640
51,241
56,881
14,173
42,708
1989201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IMilwaukeeWI
1,800
935
119
1,800
1,054
2,854
416
2,438
1999201135 years
Hart Park SquareMilwaukeeWI
1,900
21,628
69
1,900
21,697
23,597
5,749
17,848
2005201135 years
Azura Memory Care of MonroeMonroeWI
490
4,964

490
4,964
5,454
1,309
4,145
1990201135 years
Matthews of Neenah INeenahWI
710
1,157
64
713
1,218
1,931
439
1,492
2006201135 years
Matthews of Neenah IINeenahWI
720
2,339
(50)720
2,289
3,009
743
2,266
2007201135 years
Matthews of Irish RoadNeenahWI
320
1,036
87
320
1,123
1,443
412
1,031
2001201135 years
Matthews of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
800
2,167
(2)812
2,153
2,965
655
2,310
1997201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
733
6,248
11
733
6,259
6,992
940
6,052
2017201735 years
Azura Memory Care of OconomowocOconomowocWI
400
1,596
4,674
709
5,961
6,670
1,176
5,494
2016201535 years
Wilkinson Woods of OconomowocOconomowocWI
1,100
12,436
157
1,100
12,593
13,693
3,342
10,351
1992201135 years
Azura Memory Care of OshkoshOshkoshWI
190
949

190
949
1,139
319
820
1993201135 years
Matthews of PewaukeePewaukeeWI
1,180
4,124
206
1,197
4,313
5,510
1,354
4,156
2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of SheboyganSheboyganWI
1,060
6,208
1,400
1,060
7,608
8,668
1,648
7,020
1995201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis ISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,428
(113)1,389
1,296
2,685
457
2,228
2000201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis IISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,666
15
1,377
1,674
3,051
550
2,501
2000201135 years
Howard Village of St. FrancisSt. FrancisWI
2,320
17,232

2,320
17,232
19,552
4,649
14,903
2001201135 years
Azura Memory Care of StoughtonStoughtonWI
450
3,191

450
3,191
3,641
896
2,745
1992201135 years
Oak Hill TerraceWaukeshaWI
2,040
40,298

2,040
40,298
42,338
10,726
31,612
1985201135 years
Azura Memory Care of WausauWausauWI
350
3,413

350
3,413
3,763
909
2,854
1997201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Library SquareWest AllisWI
1,160
23,714

1,160
23,714
24,874
6,240
18,634
1996201135 years
Matthews of WrightstownWrightstownWI
140
376
12
140
388
528
182
346
1999201135 years
Garden Square Assisted Living of CasperCasperWY
355
3,197

355
3,197
3,552
814
2,738
1996201135 years
Whispering ChaseCheyenneWY
1,800
20,354

1,800
20,354
22,154
4,156
17,998
2008201335 years
Ashridge CourtBexhill-on-SeaSXE
2,274
4,791
(705)2,047
4,313
6,360
837
5,523
2010201540 years
Inglewood Nursing HomeEastbourneSXE
1,908
3,021
(491)1,718
2,720
4,438
608
3,830
2010201540 years
Pentlow Nursing HomeEastbourneSXE
1,964
2,462
(441)1,768
2,217
3,985
526
3,459
2007201540 years
Willows Care HomeRomfordESX
4,695
6,983
(1,164)4,227
6,287
10,514
1,119
9,395
1986201540 years
Cedars Care HomeSouthend-on-SeaESX
2,649
4,925
(755)2,385
4,434
6,819
813
6,006
2014201540 years
Mayflower Care HomeNorthfleetGSD
4,330
7,519
(1,180)3,899
6,770
10,669
1,228
9,441
2012201540 years
Maples Care HomeBexleyheathKNT
5,042
7,525
(1,252)4,540
6,775
11,315
1,217
10,098
2007201540 years
Barty House Nursing HomeMaidstoneKNT
3,769
3,089
(683)3,393
2,782
6,175
674
5,501
2013201540 years
Tunbridge Wells Care CentreTunbridge WellsKNT
4,323
5,869
(1,016)3,892
5,284
9,176
982
8,194
2010201540 years
Heathlands Care HomeChingfordLON
5,398
7,967
(1,332)4,860
7,173
12,033
1,315
10,718
1980201540 years
Hampton CareHamptonMDX
4,119
29,021
(2,154)3,852
27,134
30,986
2,107
28,879
2007201740 years
Parkfield House Nursing HomeUxbridgeMDX
1,974
1,009
(194)1,846
943
2,789
93
2,696
2000201740 years
BoréaBlainvilleQC36,125
2,678
56,643

2,678
56,643
59,321
448
58,873
2016201957 years
CaléoBouchervilleQC38,090
6,009
71,056

6,009
71,056
77,065
527
76,538
2018201959 years
L'AvantageBrossardQC20,606
8,771
44,920

8,771
44,920
53,691
394
53,297
2011201952 years
SeväCandiacQC47,744
4,030
64,251

4,030
64,251
68,281
475
67,806
2018201959 years
L'InitialGatineauQC36,953
6,720
62,928

6,720
62,928
69,648
478
69,170
2019201960 years
La Croisée de l'EstGranbyQC15,856
1,136
40,998

1,136
40,998
42,134
374
41,760
2009201950 years
AmbianceIle-des-Soeurs, VerdunQC21,657
5,007
51,624

5,007
51,624
56,631
470
56,161
2005201946 years
Le SavignonLachineQC26,429
5,271
46,919

5,271
46,919
52,190
390
51,800
2013201954 years
Le CavalierLasalleQC15,744
5,892
38,926

5,892
38,926
44,818
393
44,425
2004201945 years
Quartier SudLévisQC30,213
1,933
47,731

1,933
47,731
49,664
374
49,290
2015201956 years
MargoLévisQC36,653
2,034
63,523

2,034
63,523
65,557
472
65,085
2017201960 years
Les Promenades du ParcLongueuilQC22,562
5,832
47,101

5,832
47,101
52,933
461
52,472
2006201947 years
ElogiaMontréalQC27,124
2,808
55,175

2,808
55,175
57,983
456
57,527
2007201948 years
Les Jardins MillenMontréalQC28,728
4,325
82,121

4,325
82,121
86,446
634
85,812
2012201953 years
Le 22MontréalQC39,428
6,728
70,601

6,728
70,601
77,329
540
76,789
2016201957 years
Station EstMontréalQC44,471
4,660
59,110

4,660
59,110
63,770
469
63,301
2017201958 years
OraMontréalQC50,995
10,282
82,095

10,282
82,095
92,377
575
91,802
2019201960 years
Elogia IIMontréalQC13,279
2,519
25,244

2,519
25,244
27,763

27,763
CIPCIPCIP
Le Quartier Mont-St-HilaireMont-Saint-HilaireQC14,649
1,020
32,554

1,020
32,554
33,574
311
33,263
2008201949 years
L'Image d'OutremontOutremontQC16,424
4,565
32,030

4,565
32,030
36,595
280
36,315
2008201949 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Le GibraltarQuébecQC21,145
1,191
42,766

1,191
42,766
43,957
350
43,607
2013201954 years
ÉklaQuébecQC53,306
2,256
87,772

2,256
87,772
90,028
653
89,375
2017201957 years
Le Notre-DameRepentignyQC14,512
3,290
41,474

3,290
41,474
44,764
435
44,329
2002201943 years
Vent de l'OuestSainte-GenevièveQC13,023
4,713
32,526

4,713
32,526
37,239
334
36,905
2007201948 years
Les Verrières du GolfSaint-LaurentQC11,556
5,183
44,363

5,183
44,363
49,546
429
49,117
2003201944 years
Les Jardins du CampanileShawiniganQC12,196
578
16,580

578
16,580
17,158
202
16,956
2007201948 years
SherbrookeQC35,893
706
58,073

706
58,073
58,779
450
58,329
2015201956 years
La Cité des ToursSt-Jean-sur-RichelieuQC22,328
1,744
44,357

1,744
44,357
46,101
395
45,706
2012201953 years
IVVISt-LaurentQC20,904
4,730
41,459

4,730
41,459
46,189

46,189
CIPCIPCIP
VASTSt-LaurentQC12,121
3,847
30,401

3,847
30,401
34,248

34,248
CIPCIPCIP
CorneliusSt-LaurentQC
7,480
13,066

7,480
13,066
20,546

20,546
CIPCIPCIP
LizSt-LaurentQC10,665
11,534
17,335

11,534
17,335
28,869

28,869
CIPCIPCIP
FloréaTerrebonneQC42,207
3,275
63,246

3,275
63,246
66,521
503
66,018
2016201957 years
Le Félix Vaudreuil-DorionVaudreuil-DorionQC16,201
7,531
34,624

7,531
34,624
42,155
332
41,823
2010201951 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  1,145,360
628,999
6,210,124
156,472
624,012
6,371,583
6,995,595
1,090,105
5,905,490
   
TOTAL FOR SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  1,450,240
1,594,669
15,238,274
932,063
1,608,280
16,156,726
17,765,006
4,280,453
13,484,553
   
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS              
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46BirminghamAL

25,298
4,899

30,197
30,197
11,335
18,862
2005201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48BirminghamAL

12,698
914

13,612
13,612
4,546
9,066
1989201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52BirminghamAL

7,608
1,732

9,340
9,340
3,867
5,473
1985201035 years
Crestwood Medical PavilionHuntsvilleAL2,215
625
16,178
472
625
16,650
17,275
4,914
12,361
1994201135 years
West Valley Medical CenterBuckeye1AZ
3,348
5,233

3,348
5,233
8,581
1,306
7,275
2011201531 years
Canyon Springs Medical PlazaGilbertAZ

27,497
601

28,098
28,098
7,640
20,458
2007201235 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza 1GilbertAZ
720
11,277
1,460
772
12,685
13,457
4,401
9,056
2007201135 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical Plaza IIGilbertAZ15,033

18,610


18,610
18,610
281
18,329
2019201935 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical PlazaGlendaleAZ

12,904
1,305
20
14,189
14,209
3,915
10,294
1997201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza IIGlendaleAZ

8,100
839
20
8,919
8,939
2,544
6,395
2001201135 years
Arrowhead Physicians PlazaGlendaleAZ10,186
308
19,671
65
308
19,736
20,044
762
19,282
2004201835 years
1432 S DobsonMesaAZ

32,768
1,015

33,783
33,783
7,109
26,674
2003201335 years
1450 S DobsonMesaAZ

11,923
1,271
4
13,190
13,194
3,501
9,693
1977201135 years
1500 S DobsonMesaAZ

7,395
2,150
4
9,541
9,545
2,434
7,111
1980201135 years
1520 S DobsonMesaAZ

13,665
1,991

15,656
15,656
4,406
11,250
1986201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIPhoenixAZ

22,663
1,524
14
24,173
24,187
6,345
17,842
2002201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIIPhoenixAZ

19,521
492
12
20,001
20,013
5,597
14,416
2009201135 years
Papago Medical ParkPhoenixAZ

12,172
2,202

14,374
14,374
4,148
10,226
1989201135 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery CenterPhoenixAZ
2,800
10,150

2,800
10,150
12,950
1,898
11,052
2006201535 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked TreeMarked TreeAR
179
1,580

179
1,580
1,759
320
1,439
2009201535 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IBurbankCA
1,241
23,322
2,094
1,268
25,389
26,657
8,022
18,635
2004201135 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IIBurbankCA32,328
491
45,641
586
497
46,221
46,718
12,661
34,057
2008201135 years
Eden Medical PlazaCastro ValleyCA
258
2,455
416
328
2,801
3,129
1,513
1,616
1998201125 years
Sutter Medical CenterCastro ValleyCA

25,088
1,415

26,503
26,503
5,328
21,175
2012201235 years
United Healthcare - CypressCypressCA
12,883
38,309
7
12,883
38,316
51,199
9,126
42,073
1985201529 years
NorthBay Corporate HeadquartersFairfieldCA

19,187


19,187
19,187
4,286
14,901
2008201235 years
Gateway Medical PlazaFairfieldCA

12,872
328

13,200
13,200
2,893
10,307
1986201235 years
Solano NorthBay Health PlazaFairfieldCA

8,880
39

8,919
8,919
1,988
6,931
1990201235 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOBFairfieldCA

8,507
2,280

10,787
10,787
3,149
7,638
2014201335 years
UC Davis Medical GroupFolsomCA
1,873
10,156
224
1,873
10,380
12,253
2,076
10,177
1995201535 years
Verdugo Hills Medical Bulding IGlendaleCA
6,683
9,589
2,298
6,726
11,844
18,570
4,890
13,680
1972201223 years
Verdugo Hills Medical Bulding IIGlendaleCA
4,464
3,731
2,809
4,514
6,490
11,004
3,408
7,596
1987201219 years
Grossmont Medical TerraceLa MesaCA
88
14,192
322
88
14,514
14,602
1,872
12,730
2008201635 years
Los Alamitos Medical & Wellness PavilionLos AlamitosCA11,838
488
31,720
22
488
31,742
32,230
1,226
31,004
2013201835 years
St. Francis Lynwood MedicalLynwoodCA
688
8,385
1,857
697
10,233
10,930
4,396
6,534
1993201132 years
Facey Mission HillsMission HillsCA
15,468
30,116
4,729
15,468
34,845
50,313
7,077
43,236
2012201235 years
Mission Medical PlazaMission ViejoCA54,019
1,916
77,022
1,838
1,916
78,860
80,776
22,403
58,373
2007201135 years
St Joseph Medical TowerOrangeCA43,121
1,752
61,647
2,745
1,761
64,383
66,144
18,307
47,837
2008201135 years
Huntington PavilionPasadenaCA
3,138
83,412
10,142
3,138
93,554
96,692
32,070
64,622
2009201135 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical PavilionPomonaCA
91
31,523

91
31,523
31,614
8,496
23,118
2009201135 years
Pomerado Outpatient PavilionPowayCA
3,233
71,435
3,108
3,233
74,543
77,776
23,174
54,602
2007201135 years
San Bernardino Medical Plaza ISan BernadinoCA
789
11,133
1,511
797
12,636
13,433
11,424
2,009
1971201127 years
San Bernardino Medical Plaza IISan BernadinoCA
416
5,625
1,165
421
6,785
7,206
3,712
3,494
1988201126 years
Sutter Van NessSan FranciscoCA102,249

157,404


157,404
157,404
3,517
153,887
CIPCIPCIP
San Gabriel Valley Medical PlazaSan GabrielCA
914
5,510
948
963
6,409
7,372
2,969
4,403
2004201135 years
Santa Clarita Valley Medical PlazaSanta ClaritaCA21,370
9,708
20,020
1,951
9,782
21,897
31,679
6,802
24,877
2005201135 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical PlazaTorranceCA
262
6,945
3,435
343
10,299
10,642
4,679
5,963
1989201123 years
Vaca Valley Health PlazaVacavilleCA

9,634
716

10,350
10,350
2,184
8,166
1988201235 years
NorthBay Center For Primary Care - VacavilleVacavilleCA
777
5,632
300
777
5,932
6,709
468
6,241
1998201735 years
Potomac Medical PlazaAuroraCO
2,401
9,118
4,190
2,800
12,909
15,709
6,594
9,115
1986200735 years
Briargate Medical CampusColorado SpringsCO
1,238
12,301
1,134
1,269
13,404
14,673
5,443
9,230
2002200735 years
Printers Park Medical PlazaColorado SpringsCO
2,641
47,507
3,367
2,652
50,863
53,515
20,884
32,631
1999200735 years
Green Valley Ranch MOBDenverCO5,130

12,139
1,177
235
13,081
13,316
2,703
10,613
2007201235 years
Community Physicians PavilionLafayetteCO

10,436
1,801

12,237
12,237
4,529
7,708
2004201035 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical CenterLafayetteCO

4,393
(75)
4,318
4,318
751
3,567
2013201335 years
Dakota RidgeLittletonCO
2,540
12,901
2,027
2,549
14,919
17,468
2,487
14,981
2007201535 years
Avista Two Medical PlazaLouisvilleCO

17,330
1,882

19,212
19,212
7,333
11,879
2003200935 years
The Sierra Medical BuildingParkerCO
1,444
14,059
3,366
1,516
17,353
18,869
8,074
10,795
2009200935 years
Crown Point Healthcare PlazaParkerCO
852
5,210
167
855
5,374
6,229
1,256
4,973
2008201335 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIWheat RidgeCO

2,655
1,324

3,979
3,979
1,834
2,145
1976201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IVWheat RidgeCO

7,266
2,431

9,697
9,697
3,417
6,280
1991201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIIWheat RidgeCO

11,947
1,673

13,620
13,620
4,327
9,293
2004201035 years
DePaul Professional Office BuildingWashingtonDC

6,424
2,724

9,148
9,148
4,256
4,892
1987201035 years
Providence Medical Office BuildingWashingtonDC

2,473
1,214

3,687
3,687
1,838
1,849
1975201035 years
RTS Cape CoralCape CoralFL
368
5,448

368
5,448
5,816
1,596
4,220
1984201134 years
RTS Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
1,153
4,127

1,153
4,127
5,280
1,451
3,829
1989201131 years
RTS Key WestKey WestFL
486
4,380

486
4,380
4,866
1,146
3,720
1987201135 years
JFK Medical PlazaLake WorthFL
453
1,711
(147)
2,017
2,017
921
1,096
1999200435 years
East Pointe Medical PlazaLehigh AcresFL
327
11,816

327
11,816
12,143
2,039
10,104
1994201535 years
Palms West Building 6LoxahatcheeFL
965
2,678
(811)
2,832
2,832
1,286
1,546
2000200435 years
Bay Medical PlazaLynn HavenFL
4,215
15,041
(13,601)3,644
2,011
5,655
2,376
3,279
2003201535 years
RTS NaplesNaplesFL
1,152
3,726

1,152
3,726
4,878
1,105
3,773
1999201135 years
Bay Medical CenterPanama CityFL
82
17,400
(10,999)25
6,458
6,483
2,389
4,094
1987201535 years
RTS Pt. CharlottePt CharlotteFL
966
4,581

966
4,581
5,547
1,423
4,124
1985201134 years
RTS SarasotaSarasotaFL
1,914
3,889

1,914
3,889
5,803
1,274
4,529
1996201135 years
Capital Regional MOB ITallahasseeFL
590
8,773
(324)193
8,846
9,039
1,386
7,653
1998201535 years
Athens Medical ComplexAthensGA
2,826
18,339
45
2,826
18,384
21,210
3,274
17,936
2011201535 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGA
545
80,152
23,318
545
103,470
104,015
20,024
83,991
1978201520 years
Augusta POB IAugustaGA
233
7,894
2,364
233
10,258
10,491
6,069
4,422
1978201214 years
Augusta POB IIAugustaGA
735
13,717
4,211
735
17,928
18,663
6,530
12,133
1987201223 years
Augusta POB IIIAugustaGA
535
3,857
828
535
4,685
5,220
2,404
2,816
1994201222 years
Augusta POB IVAugustaGA
675
2,182
2,190
691
4,356
5,047
2,301
2,746
1995201223 years
Cobb Physicians CenterAustellGA
1,145
16,805
1,664
1,145
18,469
19,614
6,715
12,899
1992201135 years
Summit Professional Plaza IBrunswickGA
1,821
2,974
286
1,821
3,260
5,081
3,395
1,686
2004201231 years
Summit Professional Plaza IIBrunswickGA
981
13,818
252
981
14,070
15,051
4,413
10,638
1998201235 years
Fayette MOBFayettevilleGA
895
20,669
829
895
21,498
22,393
3,842
18,551
2004201535 years
Woodlawn Commons 1121/1163MariettaGA
5,495
16,028
1,930
5,586
17,867
23,453
3,269
20,184
1991201535 years
PAPP ClinicNewnanGA
2,167
5,477
68
2,167
5,545
7,712
1,441
6,271
1994201530 years
Parkway Physicians CenterRinggoldGA
476
10,017
1,327
476
11,344
11,820
3,959
7,861
2004201135 years
Riverdale MOBRiverdaleGA
1,025
9,783
259
1,025
10,042
11,067
1,980
9,087
2005201535 years
Rush Copley POB IAuroraIL
120
27,882
505
120
28,387
28,507
5,035
23,472
1996201534 years
Rush Copley POB IIAuroraIL
49
27,217
471
49
27,688
27,737
4,683
23,054
2009201535 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IBarringtonIL
152
3,224
785
152
4,009
4,161
807
3,354
1979201335 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IIBarringtonIL
512
12,977
1,160
512
14,137
14,649
3,155
11,494
1996201335 years
Trinity Hospital Physician Office BuildingChicagoIL
139
3,329
1,521
139
4,850
4,989
1,272
3,717
1971201335 years
Advocate Beverly CenterChicagoIL
2,227
10,140
355
2,231
10,491
12,722
2,675
10,047
1986201525 years
Crystal Lakes Medical ArtsCrystal LakeIL
2,490
19,504
389
2,535
19,848
22,383
3,687
18,696
2007201535 years
Advocate Good ShepherdCrystal LakeIL
2,444
10,953
926
2,444
11,879
14,323
2,455
11,868
2008201533 years
Physicians Plaza EastDecaturIL

791
2,522

3,313
3,313
1,210
2,103
1976201035 years
Physicians Plaza WestDecaturIL

1,943
1,204

3,147
3,147
1,252
1,895
1987201035 years
SIU Family PracticeDecaturIL

3,900
3,778

7,678
7,678
3,028
4,650
1996201035 years
304 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

8,702
2,080
29
10,753
10,782
3,630
7,152
2002201035 years
302 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

3,467
858

4,325
4,325
1,773
2,552
1993201035 years
ENTADecaturIL

1,150
16

1,166
1,166
484
682
1996201035 years
301 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

640


640
640
357
283
1980201035 years
South Shore Medical BuildingDecaturIL
902
129
56
958
129
1,087
219
868
1991201035 years
Kenwood Medical CenterDecaturIL

1,689
1,520

3,209
3,209
1,137
2,072
1997201035 years
DMH OCC Health & Wellness PartnersDecaturIL
934
1,386
168
943
1,545
2,488
707
1,781
1996201035 years
Rock Springs MedicalDecaturIL
399
495
109
399
604
1,003
273
730
1990201035 years
575 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL
111
739
24
111
763
874
340
534
1984201035 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IDowners GroveIL
407
10,337
1,270
407
11,607
12,014
2,657
9,357
1976201335 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IIDowners GroveIL
1,013
25,370
862
1,013
26,232
27,245
5,814
21,431
1995201335 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")Elk Grove VillageIL

16,315
883

17,198
17,198
7,371
9,827
2005200935 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOBGurneeIL
249
1,452
889
352
2,238
2,590
921
1,669
2005201134 years
1445 Hunt Club DriveGurneeIL
216
1,405
370
216
1,775
1,991
957
1,034
2002201131 years
Gurnee Imaging CenterGurneeIL
82
2,731

82
2,731
2,813
848
1,965
2002201135 years
Gurnee Center ClubGurneeIL
627
17,851

627
17,851
18,478
5,687
12,791
2001201135 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office BuildingHazel CrestIL
191
4,370
850
191
5,220
5,411
1,281
4,130
1989201335 years
755 Milwaukee MOBLibertyvilleIL
421
3,716
3,292
630
6,799
7,429
3,497
3,932
1990201118 years
890 Professional MOBLibertyvilleIL
214
2,630
568
214
3,198
3,412
1,334
2,078
1980201126 years
Libertyville Center ClubLibertyvilleIL
1,020
17,176

1,020
17,176
18,196
5,748
12,448
1988201135 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office BuildingOak LawnIL
658
16,421
2,843
658
19,264
19,922
3,767
16,155
1986201335 years
Methodist North MOBPeoriaIL
1,025
29,493
15
1,025
29,508
30,533
5,180
25,353
2010201535 years
Davita Dialysis - RockfordRockfordIL
256
2,543

256
2,543
2,799
526
2,273
2009201535 years
Round Lake ACCRound LakeIL
758
370
402
799
731
1,530
650
880
1984201113 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care CenterVernon HillsIL
3,376
694
416
3,413
1,073
4,486
852
3,634
1986201115 years
Wilbur S. Roby BuildingAndersonIN

2,653
1,159

3,812
3,812
1,822
1,990
1992201035 years
Ambulatory Services BuildingAndersonIN

4,266
1,926

6,192
6,192
2,952
3,240
1995201035 years
St. John's Medical Arts BuildingAndersonIN

2,281
2,050

4,331
4,331
1,779
2,552
1973201035 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Carmel ICarmelIN
466
5,954
708
466
6,662
7,128
2,470
4,658
1985201230 years
Carmel IICarmelIN
455
5,976
1,046
455
7,022
7,477
2,327
5,150
1989201233 years
Carmel IIICarmelIN
422
6,194
857
422
7,051
7,473
2,225
5,248
2001201235 years
ElkhartElkhartIN
1,256
1,973

1,256
1,973
3,229
1,443
1,786
1994201132 years
Lutheran Medical ArtsFort WayneIN
702
13,576
148
702
13,724
14,426
2,413
12,013
2000201535 years
Dupont Road MOBFort WayneIN
633
13,479
313
672
13,753
14,425
2,645
11,780
2001201535 years
Harcourt Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
519
28,951
4,610
519
33,561
34,080
10,892
23,188
1973201228 years
Cardiac Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
498
27,430
2,092
498
29,522
30,020
7,988
22,032
1995201235 years
Oncology Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
470
5,703
432
470
6,135
6,605
2,085
4,520
2003201235 years
CorVasc Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
514
9,617
533
871
9,793
10,664
1,315
9,349
2004201636 years
St. Francis South Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN

20,649
1,586
7
22,228
22,235
5,153
17,082
1995201335 years
Methodist Professional Center IIndianapolisIN
61
37,411
7,000
61
44,411
44,472
14,748
29,724
1985201225 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of ExcellenceIndianapolisIN
967
83,746
3,106
967
86,852
87,819
12,320
75,499
1997201535 years
United Healthcare - IndyIndianapolisIN
5,737
32,116

5,737
32,116
37,853
6,066
31,787
1988201535 years
LaPorteLa PorteIN
553
1,309

553
1,309
1,862
620
1,242
1997201134 years
MishawakaMishawakaIN
3,787
5,543

3,787
5,543
9,330
4,212
5,118
1993201135 years
Cancer Care PartnersMishawakaIN
3,162
28,633

3,162
28,633
31,795
4,903
26,892
2010201535 years
Michiana OncologyMishawakaIN
4,577
20,939
15
4,581
20,950
25,531
3,760
21,771
2010201535 years
DaVita Dialysis - PaoliPaoliIN
396
2,056

396
2,056
2,452
435
2,017
2011201535 years
South BendSouth BendIN
792
2,530

792
2,530
3,322
990
2,332
1996201134 years
Eberly Farm Professional BuildingWichitaKS
1,883
7,428
(4,324)1,883
3,104
4,987
1,485
3,502
2006201535 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOBAshlandKY
101
19,066
1,433
101
20,499
20,600
6,467
14,133
1997201226 years
St. Elizabeth CovingtonCovingtonKY
345
12,790
166
345
12,956
13,301
3,927
9,374
2009201235 years
St. Elizabeth Florence MOBFlorenceKY
402
8,279
1,644
402
9,923
10,325
3,623
6,702
2005201235 years
Jefferson ClinicLouisvilleKY

673
2,018

2,691
2,691
416
2,275
2013201335 years
East Jefferson Medical PlazaMetairieLA
168
17,264
2,930
168
20,194
20,362
7,634
12,728
1996201232 years
East Jefferson MOBMetairieLA
107
15,137
2,671
107
17,808
17,915
6,459
11,456
1985201228 years
Lakeside POB IMetairieLA
3,334
4,974
624
342
8,590
8,932
4,645
4,287
1986201122 years
Lakeside POB IIMetairieLA
1,046
802
(165)53
1,630
1,683
1,171
512
198020117 years
Fresenius MedicalMetairieLA
1,195
3,797
74
1,269
3,797
5,066
721
4,345
2012201535 years
RTS BerlinBerlinMD

2,216


2,216
2,216
709
1,507
1994201129 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical BuildingWestminsterMD10,458

13,795
1,849

15,644
15,644
7,599
8,045
2009200935 years
Medical Specialties BuildingKalamazooMI

19,242
1,666

20,908
20,908
6,984
13,924
1989201035 years
North Professional BuildingKalamazooMI

7,228
1,653

8,881
8,881
3,721
5,160
1983201035 years
Borgess Navigation CenterKalamazooMI

2,391


2,391
2,391
817
1,574
1976201035 years
Borgess Health & Fitness CenterKalamazooMI

11,959
605

12,564
12,564
4,313
8,251
1984201035 years
Heart Center BuildingKalamazooMI

8,420
716
176
8,960
9,136
3,387
5,749
1980201035 years
Medical Commons BuildingKalamazoo TownshipMI

661
651

1,312
1,312
698
614
1979201035 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
RTS Madison HeightsMadison HeightsMI
401
2,946

401
2,946
3,347
905
2,442
2002201135 years
Bronson Lakeview OPCPaw PawMI
3,835
31,564

3,835
31,564
35,399
6,117
29,282
2006201535 years
Pro Med Center PlainwellPlainwellMI

697
7

704
704
262
442
1991201035 years
Pro Med Center RichlandRichlandMI
233
2,267
213
233
2,480
2,713
801
1,912
1996201035 years
Henry Ford Dialysis CenterSouthfieldMI
589
3,350

589
3,350
3,939
643
3,296
2002201535 years
Metro HealthWyomingMI
1,325
5,479

1,325
5,479
6,804
1,112
5,692
2008201535 years
Spectrum HealthWyomingMI
2,463
14,353

2,463
14,353
16,816
2,912
13,904
2006201535 years
Cogdell Duluth MOBDuluthMN

33,406
(19)
33,387
33,387
7,070
26,317
2012201235 years
Allina HealthElk RiverMN
1,442
7,742
114
1,455
7,843
9,298
1,925
7,373
2002201535 years
Unitron HearingPlymouthMN
2,646
8,962
5
2,646
8,967
11,613
2,547
9,066
2011201529 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental ClinicsSartellMN
2,492
15,694
55
2,503
15,738
18,241
5,094
13,147
2010201235 years
University Physicians - Grants FerryFlowoodMS
2,796
12,125
(12)2,796
12,113
14,909
3,972
10,937
2010201235 years
Arnold Urgent CareArnoldMO
1,058
556
403
1,097
920
2,017
587
1,430
1999201135 years
DePaul Health Center NorthBridgetonMO
996
10,045
2,954
996
12,999
13,995
6,249
7,746
1976201221 years
DePaul Health Center SouthBridgetonMO
910
12,169
2,562
910
14,731
15,641
5,218
10,423
1992201230 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB DClaytonMO
103
2,780
1,321
106
4,098
4,204
1,982
2,222
1984201222 years
Fenton Urgent Care CenterFentonMO
183
2,714
367
189
3,075
3,264
1,336
1,928
2003201135 years
Broadway Medical Office BuildingKansas CityMO
1,300
12,602
9,559
1,336
22,125
23,461
8,327
15,134
1976200735 years
St. Joseph Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
305
7,445
2,297
305
9,742
10,047
2,784
7,263
1988201232 years
St. Joseph Medical MallKansas CityMO
530
9,115
613
530
9,728
10,258
3,167
7,091
1995201233 years
Carondelet Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
745
12,437
3,236
745
15,673
16,418
5,542
10,876
1979201229 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building IILake Saint LouisMO
524
3,229
840
524
4,069
4,593
1,502
3,091
2005201235 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office BuildingO'FallonMO
940
5,556
332
960
5,868
6,828
1,817
5,011
1992201235 years
Sisters of Mercy BuildingSpringfieldMO
3,427
8,697

3,427
8,697
12,124
1,877
10,247
2008201535 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1St. CharlesMO
503
4,336
1,338
503
5,674
6,177
2,901
3,276
1987201220 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2St. CharlesMO
369
2,963
1,423
369
4,386
4,755
1,792
2,963
1999201232 years
Physicians Office CenterSt. LouisMO
1,445
13,825
894
1,445
14,719
16,164
6,460
9,704
2003201135 years
12700 Southford Road Medical PlazaSt. LouisMO
595
12,584
2,756
595
15,340
15,935
5,989
9,946
1993201132 years
Mercy South MOB ASt. LouisMO
409
4,687
1,668
409
6,355
6,764
3,276
3,488
1975201120 years
Mercy South MOB BSt. LouisMO
350
3,942
1,088
350
5,030
5,380
2,795
2,585
1980201121 years
Lemay Urgent Care CenterSt. LouisMO
2,317
3,120
696
2,355
3,778
6,133
2,254
3,879
1983201122 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB BSt. LouisMO
119
4,161
12,546
119
16,707
16,826
3,382
13,444
1979201223 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB CSt. LouisMO
136
6,018
3,825
136
9,843
9,979
3,083
6,896
1969201220 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical CenterCarson CityNV
2,748
27,010
3,444
2,898
30,304
33,202
6,030
27,172
1981201535 years
Carson Tahoe MOB WestCarson CityNV
802
11,855
213
703
12,167
12,870
2,262
10,608
2007201529 years
Del E Webb Medical PlazaHendersonNV
1,028
16,993
2,469
1,028
19,462
20,490
6,932
13,558
1999201135 years
Durango Medical PlazaLas VegasNV
3,787
27,738
(2,855)3,683
24,987
28,670
4,710
23,960
2008201535 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
The Terrace at South MeadowsRenoNV6,418
504
9,966
685
504
10,651
11,155
3,975
7,180
2004201135 years
Cooper Health MOB IWillingboroNJ
1,389
2,742
4
1,398
2,737
4,135
699
3,436
2010201535 years
Cooper Health MOB IIWillingboroNJ
594
5,638
65
594
5,703
6,297
1,025
5,272
2012201535 years
Salem MedicalWoodstownNJ
275
4,132
6
275
4,138
4,413
742
3,671
2010201535 years
Albany Medical Center MOBAlbanyNY
321
18,389
32
321
18,421
18,742
2,839
15,903
2010201535 years
St. Peter's Recovery CenterGuilderlandNY
1,059
9,156

1,059
9,156
10,215
1,900
8,315
1990201535 years
Central NY Medical CenterSyracuseNY
1,786
26,101
3,393
1,792
29,488
31,280
9,472
21,808
1997201233 years
Northcountry MOBWatertownNY
1,320
10,799
310
1,320
11,109
12,429
2,234
10,195
2001201535 years
RandolphCharlotteNC
6,370
2,929
2,494
6,418
5,375
11,793
4,280
7,513
197320124 years
Mallard Crossing ICharlotteNC
3,229
2,072
852
3,269
2,884
6,153
2,143
4,010
1997201225 years
Medical Arts BuildingConcordNC
701
11,734
1,171
701
12,905
13,606
5,111
8,495
1997201231 years
Gateway Medical Office BuildingConcordNC
1,100
9,904
698
1,100
10,602
11,702
4,094
7,608
2005201235 years
Copperfield Medical MallConcordNC
1,980
2,846
539
2,139
3,226
5,365
1,902
3,463
1989201225 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric MedicineConcordNC
574
688
37
574
725
1,299
391
908
2000201227 years
Duke Health Center South DurhamDurhamNC
4,347
75,728

4,347
75,728
80,075
1,260
78,815
2017201935 years
Rex Wellness CenterGarnerNC
1,348
5,330
438
1,354
5,762
7,116
1,356
5,760
2003201534 years
Gaston Professional CenterGastoniaNC
833
24,885
3,110
863
27,965
28,828
8,110
20,718
1997201235 years
Harrisburg Family PhysiciansHarrisburgNC
679
1,646
73
679
1,719
2,398
625
1,773
1996201235 years
Harrisburg Medical MallHarrisburgNC
1,339
2,292
311
1,339
2,603
3,942
1,291
2,651
1997201227 years
NorthcrossHuntersvilleNC
623
278
229
623
507
1,130
299
831
1993201222 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness CenterKnightdaleNC

22,823
989
50
23,762
23,812
5,256
18,556
2009201235 years
Midland Medical ParkMidlandNC
1,221
847
120
1,221
967
2,188
637
1,551
1998201225 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
803
998
19
805
1,015
1,820
467
1,353
2000201233 years
Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
479
1,297
51
479
1,348
1,827
643
1,184
1990201225 years
Rocky Mount Medical ParkRocky MountNC
2,552
7,779
2,665
2,652
10,344
12,996
4,002
8,994
1991201230 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts ClinicMinotND
935
15,482
372
951
15,838
16,789
3,876
12,913
1995201526 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building ICincinnatiOH

9,632
2,299
146
11,785
11,931
5,419
6,512
1984200735 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building IICincinnatiOH

15,123
3,535

18,658
18,658
8,008
10,650
2007200735 years
Riverside North Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
785
8,519
1,818
785
10,337
11,122
4,703
6,419
1962201225 years
Riverside South Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
586
7,298
935
610
8,209
8,819
3,486
5,333
1985201227 years
340 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
10
9,443
1,259
10
10,702
10,712
3,652
7,060
1984201229 years
393 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
61
4,760
635
61
5,395
5,456
2,215
3,241
1970201220 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
80
1,113
2,922
80
4,035
4,115
950
3,165
1971201214 years
Doctors West Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
414
5,362
835
414
6,197
6,611
2,240
4,371
1998201235 years
Eastside Health CenterColumbusOH
956
3,472
(2)956
3,470
4,426
2,198
2,228
1977201215 years
East Main Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
440
4,771
67
440
4,838
5,278
1,690
3,588
2006201235 years
Heart Center Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
1,063
12,140
718
1,063
12,858
13,921
4,464
9,457
2004201235 years
Wilkins Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
123
18,062
1,113
123
19,175
19,298
5,078
14,220
2002201235 years
Grady Medical Office BuildingDelawareOH
239
2,263
570
239
2,833
3,072
1,233
1,839
1991201225 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Dublin Northwest Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
342
3,278
281
342
3,559
3,901
1,459
2,442
2001201234 years
Preserve III Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
2,449
7,025
1,211
2,449
8,236
10,685
2,893
7,792
2006201235 years
Zanesville Surgery CenterZanesvilleOH
172
9,403

172
9,403
9,575
2,722
6,853
2000201135 years
Dialysis CenterZanesvilleOH
534
855
99
534
954
1,488
661
827
1960201121 years
Genesis Children's CenterZanesvilleOH
538
3,781

538
3,781
4,319
1,492
2,827
2006201130 years
Medical Arts Building IZanesvilleOH
429
2,405
666
436
3,064
3,500
1,598
1,902
1970201120 years
Medical Arts Building IIZanesvilleOH
485
6,013
1,537
532
7,503
8,035
3,539
4,496
1995201125 years
Medical Arts Building IIIZanesvilleOH
94
1,248

94
1,248
1,342
615
727
1970201125 years
Primecare BuildingZanesvilleOH
130
1,344
648
130
1,992
2,122
1,060
1,062
1978201120 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation BuildingZanesvilleOH
82
1,541

82
1,541
1,623
654
969
1985201128 years
Radiation Oncology BuildingZanesvilleOH
105
1,201

105
1,201
1,306
609
697
1988201125 years
HealthplexZanesvilleOH
2,488
15,849
1,199
2,649
16,887
19,536
6,803
12,733
1990201132 years
Physicians PavilionZanesvilleOH
422
6,297
1,577
422
7,874
8,296
3,627
4,669
1990201125 years
Zanesville Northside PharmacyZanesvilleOH
42
635

42
635
677
278
399
1985201128 years
Bethesda Campus MOB IIIZanesvilleOH
188
1,137
234
199
1,360
1,559
633
926
1978201125 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical PlazaHillsboroOR17,554
1,516
24,638
1,476
1,546
26,084
27,630
8,783
18,847
2003201135 years
Professional Office Building IChesterPA

6,283
3,330

9,613
9,613
5,057
4,556
1978200430 years
DCMH Medical Office BuildingDrexel HillPA

10,424
2,612

13,036
13,036
7,072
5,964
1984200430 years
Pinnacle HealthHarrisburgPA
2,574
16,767
943
2,766
17,518
20,284
3,556
16,728
2002201535 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation HospitalLancasterPA
959
16,610
(16)959
16,594
17,553
5,141
12,412
2007201235 years
Lancaster ASC MOBLancasterPA
593
17,117
491
593
17,608
18,201
5,964
12,237
2007201235 years
St. Joseph Medical Office BuildingReadingPA

10,823
811

11,634
11,634
4,326
7,308
2006201035 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB ISpringfieldPA
9,130
47,078

9,130
47,078
56,208
10,551
45,657
1996201535 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB IISpringfieldPA
5,178
6,523

5,178
6,523
11,701
1,555
10,146
1998201525 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness CenterWarringtonPA
4,452
17,383
1,191
4,497
18,529
23,026
6,248
16,778
2001201234 years
Roper Medical Office BuildingCharlestonSC
127
14,737
4,116
127
18,853
18,980
7,044
11,936
1990201228 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)CharlestonSC
447
3,946
711
447
4,657
5,104
1,874
3,230
2003201235 years
Providence MOB IColumbiaSC
225
4,274
884
225
5,158
5,383
2,809
2,574
1979201218 years
Providence MOB IIColumbiaSC
122
1,834
289
150
2,095
2,245
1,104
1,141
1985201218 years
Providence MOB IIIColumbiaSC
766
4,406
946
766
5,352
6,118
2,174
3,944
1990201223 years
One Medical ParkColumbiaSC
210
7,939
2,190
214
10,125
10,339
4,568
5,771
1984201219 years
Three Medical ParkColumbiaSC
40
10,650
1,912
40
12,562
12,602
5,219
7,383
1988201225 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office BuildingGreenvilleSC14,161

13,062
10,711
30
23,743
23,773
12,135
11,638
2009200935 years
200 AndrewsGreenvilleSC
789
2,014
1,559
810
3,552
4,362
1,827
2,535
1994201229 years
St. Francis CMOBGreenvilleSC
501
7,661
1,068
501
8,729
9,230
2,850
6,380
2001201235 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery CenterGreenvilleSC
1,007
16,538
997
1,007
17,535
18,542
6,253
12,289
2001201235 years


 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
IRFS AND LTACS     
  
  
  
  
 
  
   
Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern ArizonaTucsonAZ$
$770
$25,589
$
$770
$25,589
$26,359
$4,920
$21,439
1992201135 years
Kindred Hospital - BreaBreaCA
3,144
2,611

3,144
2,611
5,755
1,467
4,288
1990199540 years
Kindred Hospital - OntarioOntarioCA
523
2,988

523
2,988
3,511
3,076
435
1950199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San DiegoSan DiegoCA
670
11,764

670
11,764
12,434
11,739
695
1965199425 years
Kindred Hospital - San Francisco Bay AreaSan LeandroCA
2,735
5,870

2,735
5,870
8,605
6,142
2,463
1962199325 years
Tustin Rehabilitation HospitalTustinCA
2,810
25,248

2,810
25,248
28,058
4,948
23,110
1991201135 years
Kindred Hospital - WestminsterWestminsterCA
727
7,384

727
7,384
8,111
7,562
549
1973199320 years
Kindred Hospital - DenverDenverCO
896
6,367

896
6,367
7,263
6,711
552
1963199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - Coral GablesCoral GablesFL
1,071
5,348

1,071
5,348
6,419
5,008
1,411
1956199230 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida Ft. LauderdaleFort LauderdaleFL
1,758
14,080

1,758
14,080
15,838
13,973
1,865
1969198930 years
Kindred Hospital - North FloridaGreen Cove SpringsFL
145
4,613

145
4,613
4,758
4,642
116
1956199420 years
Kindred Hospital - South Florida - HollywoodHollywoodFL
605
5,229

605
5,229
5,834
5,234
600
1937199520 years
Kindred Hospital - Bay Area St. PetersburgSt. PetersburgFL
1,401
16,706

1,401
16,706
18,107
14,787
3,320
1968199740 years
Kindred Hospital - Central TampaTampaFL
2,732
7,676

2,732
7,676
10,408
5,294
5,114
1970199340 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (North Campus)ChicagoIL
1,583
19,980

1,583
19,980
21,563
19,711
1,852
1949199525 years
Kindred - Chicago - LakeshoreChicagoIL
1,513
9,525

1,513
9,525
11,038
9,474
1,564
1995197620 years
Kindred Hospital - Chicago (Northlake Campus)NorthlakeIL
850
6,498

850
6,498
7,348
6,198
1,150
1960199130 years
Kindred Hospital - SycamoreSycamoreIL
77
8,549

77
8,549
8,626
8,297
329
1949199320 years
Kindred Hospital - IndianapolisIndianapolisIN
985
3,801

985
3,801
4,786
3,566
1,220
1955199330 years
Kindred Hospital - LouisvilleLouisvilleKY
3,041
12,279

3,041
12,279
15,320
12,536
2,784
1964199520 years
Kindred Hospital - St. LouisSt. LouisMO
1,126
2,087

1,126
2,087
3,213
1,948
1,265
1984199140 years
Kindred Hospital - Las Vegas (Sahara)Las VegasNV
1,110
2,177

1,110
2,177
3,287
1,448
1,839
1980199440 years
Lovelace Rehabilitation HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
401
17,186
1,415
401
18,601
19,002
1,329
17,673
1989201536 years
Kindred Hospital - AlbuquerqueAlbuquerqueNM
11
4,253

11
4,253
4,264
2,961
1,303
1985199340 years
Kindred Hospital - GreensboroGreensboroNC
1,010
7,586

1,010
7,586
8,596
7,686
910
1964199420 years
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Francis Professional Medical CenterGreenvilleSC
342
6,337
1,944
371
8,252
8,623
3,295
5,328
1984201224 years
St. Francis Women'sGreenvilleSC
322
4,877
1,195
322
6,072
6,394
2,886
3,508
1991201224 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)GreenvilleSC
88
5,876
2,006
98
7,872
7,970
2,839
5,131
1998201224 years
River Hills Medical PlazaLittle RiverSC
1,406
1,813
199
1,406
2,012
3,418
1,025
2,393
1999201227 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office LongpointMount PleasantSC
670
4,455
1,268
632
5,761
6,393
2,432
3,961
2001201234 years
Medical Arts Center of OrangeburgOrangeburgSC
823
3,299
492
823
3,791
4,614
1,487
3,127
1984201228 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office BldgSpartanburgSC
291
5,057
610
300
5,658
5,958
2,166
3,792
1991201231 years
Spartanburg ASCSpartanburgSC
1,333
15,756

1,333
15,756
17,089
2,564
14,525
2002201535 years
Spartanburg Regional MOBSpartanburgSC
207
17,963
760
286
18,644
18,930
3,385
15,545
1986201535 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOBBristolTN
999
5,027
110
1,032
5,104
6,136
1,067
5,069
2001201535 years
Health Park Medical Office BuildingChattanoogaTN
2,305
8,949
701
2,305
9,650
11,955
3,116
8,839
2004201235 years
Peerless Crossing Medical CenterClevelandTN
1,217
6,464
22
1,217
6,486
7,703
2,128
5,575
2006201235 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office BuildingClintonTN
298
618
121
298
739
1,037
259
778
1988201539 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOBFarragutTN
221
2,719
175
221
2,894
3,115
697
2,418
1997201539 years
Medical Center Physicians TowerJacksonTN12,693
549
27,074
97
598
27,122
27,720
9,104
18,616
2010201235 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery CenterKnoxvilleTN
129
1,012

129
1,012
1,141
425
716
1999201524 years
Texas Clinic at ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,781
24,515
545
2,845
24,996
27,841
4,372
23,469
2010201535 years
Seton Medical Park TowerAustinTX
805
41,527
4,113
1,329
45,116
46,445
12,431
34,014
1968201235 years
Seton Northwest Health PlazaAustinTX
444
22,632
3,605
444
26,237
26,681
7,276
19,405
1988201235 years
Seton Southwest Health PlazaAustinTX
294
5,311
516
294
5,827
6,121
1,551
4,570
2004201235 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza IIAustinTX
447
10,154
71
447
10,225
10,672
2,879
7,793
2009201235 years
BioLife Sciences BuildingDentonTX
1,036
6,576

1,036
6,576
7,612
1,378
6,234
2010201535 years
East Houston MOB, LLCHoustonTX
356
2,877
1,178
328
4,083
4,411
2,860
1,551
1982201115 years
East Houston Medical PlazaHoustonTX
671
426
10
237
870
1,107
993
114
1982201111 years
Memorial HermannHoustonTX
822
14,307

822
14,307
15,129
2,445
12,684
2012201535 years
Scott & White HealthcareKingslandTX
534
5,104

534
5,104
5,638
1,000
4,638
2012201535 years
Lakeway Medical PlazaLakewayTX9,169
270
20,169
372
270
20,541
20,811
766
20,045
2011201835 years
Odessa Regional MOBOdessaTX
121
8,935

121
8,935
9,056
1,588
7,468
2008201535 years
Legacy Heart CenterPlanoTX
3,081
8,890
94
3,081
8,984
12,065
1,945
10,120
2005201535 years
Seton Williamson Medical PlazaRound RockTX

15,074
693

15,767
15,767
5,798
9,969
2008201035 years
Sunnyvale Medical PlazaSunnyvaleTX
1,186
15,397
439
1,243
15,779
17,022
3,074
13,948
2009201535 years
Texarkana ASCTexarkanaTX
814
5,903
137
814
6,040
6,854
1,361
5,493
1994201530 years
Spring Creek Medical PlazaTomballTX
2,165
8,212
155
2,165
8,367
10,532
1,475
9,057
2006201535 years
MRMC MOB IMechanicsvilleVA
1,669
7,024
648
1,669
7,672
9,341
3,462
5,879
1993201231 years
Henrico MOBRichmondVA
968
6,189
1,354
359
8,152
8,511
3,589
4,922
1976201125 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)RichmondVA
227
2,961
689
227
3,650
3,877
1,731
2,146
1968201222 years
Stony Point Medical CenterRichmondVA
3,822
16,127
21
3,822
16,148
19,970
3,020
16,950
2004201535 years
St. Francis Cancer CenterRichmondVA
654
18,331
1,537
657
19,865
20,522
3,349
17,173
2006201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
University Hospitals Rehabilitation HospitalBeachwoodOH
1,800
16,444

1,800
16,444
18,244
2,236
16,008
2013201335 years
Kindred Hospital - PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPA
135
5,223

135
5,223
5,358
3,514
1,844
1960199535 years
Kindred Hospital - ChattanoogaChattanoogaTN
756
4,415

756
4,415
5,171
4,176
995
1975199322 years
Rehabilitation Hospital of DallasDallasTX
2,318
38,702

2,318
38,702
41,020
3,591
37,429
2009201535 years
Baylor Institute for Rehabilition - Ft. Worth TXFort WorthTX
2,071
16,018

2,071
16,018
18,089
1,613
16,476
2008201535 years
Kindred Hospital - Tarrant County (Fort Worth Southwest)Fort WorthTX
2,342
7,458

2,342
7,458
9,800
7,505
2,295
1987198620 years
Rehabilitation Hospital The VintageHoustonTX
1,838
34,832

1,838
34,832
36,670
3,390
33,280
2012201535 years
Kindred Hospital (Houston Northwest)HoustonTX
1,699
6,788

1,699
6,788
8,487
5,778
2,709
1986198540 years
Kindred Hospital - HoustonHoustonTX
33
7,062

33
7,062
7,095
6,667
428
1972199420 years
Kindred Hospital - MansfieldMansfieldTX
267
2,462

267
2,462
2,729
2,015
714
1983199040 years
Select Rehabilitation - San Antonio TXSan AntonioTX
1,859
18,301

1,859
18,301
20,160
1,807
18,353
2010201535 years
Kindred Hospital - San AntonioSan AntonioTX
249
11,413

249
11,413
11,662
9,533
2,129
1981199330 years
TOTAL FOR IRFS AND LTACS  
47,061
404,512
1,415
47,061
405,927
452,988
222,482
230,506
   
SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  

  
  
  
  
  
   
    
Englewood Post Acute and RehabilitationEnglewoodCO
241
2,180
194
241
2,374
2,615
2,015
600
1960199530 years
Brookdale Lisle SNFLisleIL
730
9,270

730
9,270
10,000
2,863
7,137
1990200935 years
Lopatcong CenterPhillipsburgNJ
1,490
12,336

1,490
12,336
13,826
6,031
7,795
1982200430 years
Marietta Convalescent CenterMariettaOH
158
3,266
75
158
3,341
3,499
3,288
211
1972199325 years
The BelvedereChesterPA
822
7,203

822
7,203
8,025
3,511
4,514
1899200430 years
Pennsburg ManorPennsburgPA
1,091
7,871

1,091
7,871
8,962
3,889
5,073
1982200430 years
Chapel ManorPhiladelphiaPA
1,595
13,982
1,358
1,595
15,340
16,935
7,805
9,130
1948200430 years
Wayne CenterStraffordPA
662
6,872
850
662
7,722
8,384
4,148
4,236
1897200430 years
Everett Rehabilitation & CareEverettWA
2,750
27,337

2,750
27,337
30,087
5,456
24,631
1995201135 years
Northwest Continuum Care CenterLongviewWA
145
2,563
171
145
2,734
2,879
2,377
502
1955199229 years
Columbia Crest Care & Rehabilitation CenterMoses LakeWA
660
17,439

660
17,439
18,099
3,564
14,535
1972201135 years
Lake Ridge Solana Alzheimer's Care CenterMoses LakeWA
660
8,866

660
8,866
9,526
1,886
7,640
1988201135 years
Rainier Vista Care CenterPuyallupWA
520
4,780
305
520
5,085
5,605
3,355
2,250
1986199140 years
Logan CenterLoganWV
300
12,959

300
12,959
13,259
2,597
10,662
1987201135 years
Ravenswood Healthcare CenterRavenswoodWV
320
12,710

320
12,710
13,030
2,556
10,474
1987201135 years
Valley CenterSouth CharlestonWV
750
24,115

750
24,115
24,865
4,897
19,968
1987201135 years
White SulphurWhite Sulphur SpringsWV
250
13,055

250
13,055
13,305
2,641
10,664
1987201135 years
TOTAL FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES  
13,144
186,804
2,953
13,144
189,757
202,901
62,879
140,022
   
               
HEALTH SYSTEMS  
          
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bonney Lake Medical Office BuildingBonney LakeWA10,320
5,176
14,375
205
5,176
14,580
19,756
5,127
14,629
2011201235 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office BuildingPuyallupWA12,311
781
30,368
1,303
801
31,651
32,452
9,192
23,260
2011201235 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOBSpokaneWA

19,085
346

19,431
19,431
4,404
15,027
2007201235 years
Physician's PavilionVancouverWA
1,411
32,939
1,199
1,450
34,099
35,549
10,982
24,567
2001201135 years
Administration BuildingVancouverWA
296
7,856
44
317
7,879
8,196
2,507
5,689
1972201135 years
Medical Center Physician's BuildingVancouverWA
1,225
31,246
4,072
1,404
35,139
36,543
11,097
25,446
1980201135 years
Memorial MOBVancouverWA
663
12,626
1,620
690
14,219
14,909
4,438
10,471
1999201135 years
Salmon Creek MOBVancouverWA
1,325
9,238
605
1,325
9,843
11,168
2,991
8,177
1994201135 years
Fisher's Landing MOBVancouverWA
1,590
5,420
434
1,613
5,831
7,444
2,089
5,355
1995201134 years
Columbia Medical PlazaVancouverWA
281
5,266
409
331
5,625
5,956
1,935
4,021
1991201135 years
Appleton Heart InstituteAppletonWI

7,775
46

7,821
7,821
2,511
5,310
2003201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices WestAppletonWI

5,756
842

6,598
6,598
1,989
4,609
1989201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices SouthAppletonWI

9,058
200

9,258
9,258
3,174
6,084
1983201039 years
Brookfield ClinicBrookfieldWI
2,638
4,093
(2,198)440
4,093
4,533
1,666
2,867
1999201135 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - FranklinFranklinWI
1,973
7,579
149
2,029
7,672
9,701
1,607
8,094
2008201534 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - GreenfieldGreenfieldWI
1,223
13,387
61
1,223
13,448
14,671
2,317
12,354
2010201535 years
Aurora Health Care - HartfordHartfordWI
3,706
22,019

3,706
22,019
25,725
4,292
21,433
2006201535 years
Hartland ClinicHartlandWI
321
5,050

321
5,050
5,371
1,756
3,615
1994201135 years
Aurora Healthcare - KenoshaKenoshaWI
7,546
19,155

7,546
19,155
26,701
3,815
22,886
2014201535 years
Univ of Wisconsin HealthMononaWI
678
8,017

678
8,017
8,695
1,704
6,991
2011201535 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office PavilionNeenahWI

7,080
1,036

8,116
8,116
2,587
5,529
1993201039 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4NeenahWI

4,462
95

4,557
4,557
1,593
2,964
2006201039 years
Aurora Health Care - NeenahNeenahWI
2,033
9,072

2,033
9,072
11,105
1,898
9,207
2006201535 years
New Berlin ClinicNew BerlinWI
678
7,121

678
7,121
7,799
2,663
5,136
1999201135 years
United Healthcare - OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
4,623
5,527

4,623
5,527
10,150
1,501
8,649
1995201535 years
WestWood Health & FitnessPewaukeeWI
823
11,649

823
11,649
12,472
4,380
8,092
1997201135 years
Aurora Health Care - Two RiversTwo RiversWI
5,638
25,308

5,638
25,308
30,946
4,972
25,974
2006201535 years
Watertown ClinicWatertownWI
166
3,234

166
3,234
3,400
1,084
2,316
2003201135 years
Southside ClinicWaukeshaWI
218
5,273

218
5,273
5,491
1,790
3,701
1997201135 years
Rehabilitation HospitalWaukeshaWI
372
15,636

372
15,636
16,008
4,665
11,343
2008201135 years
United Healthcare - WauwatosaWawatosaWI
8,012
15,992
76
8,012
16,068
24,080
3,851
20,229
1995201535 years
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS  390,573
384,350
4,260,601
355,020
379,826
4,620,145
4,999,971
1,296,854
3,703,117
   
LIFE SCIENCES OFFICE BUILDINGS              
Phoenix Biomedical Campus Phase IPhoenixAZ

26,493


26,493
26,493

26,493
CIPCIPCIP
100 College StreetNew HavenCT
2,706
186,570
6,213
2,706
192,783
195,489
13,295
182,194
2013201659 years
300 George StreetNew HavenCT
2,262
122,144
6,217
2,582
128,041
130,623
9,486
121,137
2014201650 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lovelace Medical Center DowntownAlbuquerqueNM
9,840
156,535
5,319
9,928
161,766
171,694
12,499
159,195
1968201533 years
Lovelace Westside HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
10,107
18,501
(3,873)10,107
14,628
24,735
2,879
21,856
1984201520 years
Lovelace Women's HospitalAlbuquerqueNM
7,236
183,866
10,317
7,236
194,183
201,419
10,423
190,996
1983201547 years
Roswell Regional HospitalRoswellNM
2,560
41,164
1,509
2,560
42,673
45,233
2,380
42,853
2007201547 years
Hillcrest Hospital ClaremoreClaremoreOK
3,623
34,359
(10,268)3,623
24,091
27,714
1,716
25,998
1955201540 years
Bailey Medical CenterOwassoOK
4,964
8,969
(1,782)4,964
7,187
12,151
799
11,352
2006201532 years
Hillcrest Medical CenterTulsaOK
28,319
215,199
8,605
28,319
223,804
252,123
16,487
235,636
1928201534 years
Hillcrest Hospital SouthTulsaOK
17,026
100,892
12,243
17,026
113,135
130,161
7,535
122,626
1999201540 years
Baptist St. Anthony's HospitalAmarilloTX
13,779
358,029
13,713
13,015
372,506
385,521
20,940
364,581
1967201544 years
Spire Hull and East Riding HospitalAnlabyUK
3,194
81,613
(11,223)2,771
70,813
73,584
5,425
68,159
2010201450 years
Spire Fylde Coast HospitalBlackpoolUK
2,446
28,896
(4,148)2,122
25,072
27,194
1,949
25,245
1980201450 years
Spire Clare Park HospitalFarnhamUK
6,263
26,119
(4,286)5,434
22,662
28,096
1,831
26,265
2009201450 years
TOTAL FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS  
109,357
1,254,142
16,126
107,105
1,272,520
1,379,625
84,863
1,294,762
   
BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Brookdale Chandler Ray RoadChandlerAZ
2,000
6,538

2,000
6,538
8,538
1,418
7,120
1998201135 years
Brookdale Springs MesaMesaAZ
2,747
24,918

2,747
24,918
27,665
10,793
16,872
1986200535 years
Brookdale East ArborMesaAZ
655
6,998

655
6,998
7,653
3,009
4,644
1998200535 years
Brookdale Oro ValleyOro ValleyAZ
666
6,169

666
6,169
6,835
2,653
4,182
1998200535 years
Brookdale PeoriaPeoriaAZ
598
4,872

598
4,872
5,470
2,095
3,375
1998200535 years
Brookdale TempeTempeAZ
611
4,066

611
4,066
4,677
1,748
2,929
1997200535 years
Brookdale East TucsonTucsonAZ
506
4,745

506
4,745
5,251
2,040
3,211
1998200535 years
Brookdale AnaheimAnaheimCA
2,464
7,908

2,464
7,908
10,372
3,148
7,224
1977200535 years
Brookdale Redwood CityRedwood CityCA
7,669
66,691

7,669
66,691
74,360
29,097
45,263
1988200535 years
Brookdale San JoseSan JoseCA
6,240
66,329
12,838
6,240
79,167
85,407
29,510
55,897
1987200535 years
Brookdale San MarcosSan MarcosCA
4,288
36,204

4,288
36,204
40,492
15,879
24,613
1987200535 years
Brookdale TracyTracyCA
1,110
13,296

1,110
13,296
14,406
4,974
9,432
1986200535 years
Brookdale Boulder CreekBoulderCO
1,290
20,683

1,290
20,683
21,973
4,217
17,756
1985201135 years
Brookdale Vista GrandeColorado SpringsCO
715
9,279

715
9,279
9,994
3,990
6,004
1997200535 years
Brookdale El CaminoPuebloCO4,773
840
9,403

840
9,403
10,243
4,043
6,200
1997200535 years
Brookdale FarmingtonFarmingtonCT
3,995
36,310

3,995
36,310
40,305
15,722
24,583
1984200535 years
Brookdale South WindsorSouth WindsorCT
2,187
12,682

2,187
12,682
14,869
5,004
9,865
1999200435 years
Brookdale ChatfieldWest HartfordCT
2,493
22,833
22,296
2,493
45,129
47,622
10,806
36,816
1989200535 years
Brookdale Bonita SpringsBonita SpringsFL8,599
1,540
10,783

1,540
10,783
12,323
4,580
7,743
1989200535 years
Brookdale West Boynton BeachBoynton BeachFL13,178
2,317
16,218

2,317
16,218
18,535
6,731
11,804
1999200535 years
Brookdale Deer Creek AL/MCDeerfield BeachFL
1,399
9,791

1,399
9,791
11,190
4,369
6,821
1999200535 years
Brookdale Fort Myers The ColonyFort MyersFL
1,510
7,862

1,510
7,862
9,372
1,587
7,785
1996201135 years
Brookdale AvondaleJacksonvilleFL
860
16,745

860
16,745
17,605
3,264
14,341
1997201135 years
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Univ. of Miami Life Science and Technology ParkMiamiFL
2,249
87,019
5,722
2,253
92,737
94,990
8,581
86,409
2014201653 years
IITChicagoIL
30
55,620
678
30
56,298
56,328
4,500
51,828
2006201646 years
1030 Mass AveCambridgeMA
12,175
112,809

12,175
112,809
124,984
2,536
122,448
1986201935 years
University of Maryland BioPark I Unit 1BaltimoreMD
113
25,199
793
113
25,992
26,105
2,015
24,090
2005201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIBaltimoreMD
61
91,764
4,294
61
96,058
96,119
7,968
88,151
2007201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark GarageBaltimoreMD
77
4,677
350
77
5,027
5,104
675
4,429
2007201629 years
Tributary StreetBaltimoreMD
4,015
15,905
597
4,015
16,502
20,517
1,925
18,592
1998201645 years
Beckley StreetBaltimoreMD
2,813
13,481
558
2,813
14,039
16,852
1,688
15,164
1999201645 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIIBaltimoreMD
1,067


1,067

1,067

1,067
CIPCIPCIP
Heritage at 4240Saint LouisMO
403
47,125
836
452
47,912
48,364
4,994
43,370
2013201645 years
Cortex 1Saint LouisMO
631
26,543
1,142
631
27,685
28,316
3,091
25,225
2005201650 years
BRDG ParkSaint LouisMO
606
37,083
2,193
606
39,276
39,882
3,326
36,556
2009201652 years
4220 Duncan AvenueSt LouisMO13,856
1,871
35,044
4,150
1,871
39,194
41,065
2,633
38,432
2018201835 years
311 South Sarah StreetSt. LouisMO
5,154


5,154

5,154
158
4,996
CIPCIPCIP
4300 DuncanSt. LouisMO
2,818
46,749
18
2,818
46,767
49,585
3,264
46,321
2008201735 years
Weston ParkwayCaryNC
1,372
6,535
1,743
1,372
8,278
9,650
1,080
8,570
1990201650 years
Patriot DriveDurhamNC
1,960
10,749
372
1,960
11,121
13,081
1,067
12,014
2010201650 years
ChesterfieldDurhamNC
3,594
57,781
4,801
3,619
62,557
66,176
9,602
56,574
2017201760 years
Paramount ParkwayMorrisvilleNC
1,016
19,794
617
1,016
20,411
21,427
2,172
19,255
1999201645 years
Wake 90Winston-SalemNC
2,752
79,949
1,296
2,752
81,245
83,997
8,056
75,941
2013201640 years
Wake 91Winston-SalemNC
1,729
73,690
19
1,729
73,709
75,438
5,988
69,450
2011201650 years
Wake 60Winston-SalemNC15,000
1,243
83,414
1,370
1,243
84,784
86,027
9,164
76,863
2016201635 years
Bailey Power PlantWinston-SalemNC
1,930
34,122
155
846
35,361
36,207
2,737
33,470
2017201735 years
Hershey Center Unit 1HummelstownPA
813
23,699
937
813
24,636
25,449
2,213
23,236
2007201650 years
3737 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA67,945
40
141,981
6,110
40
148,091
148,131
9,961
138,170
2014201654 years
3711 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
12,320
69,278
6,796
12,320
76,074
88,394
6,103
82,291
2008201648 years
3675 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA111,876
11,370
109,846
42,275
11,370
152,121
163,491
5,101
158,390
2018201835 years
3701 Filbert StreetPhiladelphiaPA
3,655


3,655

3,655

3,655
CIPCIPCIP
115 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA
2,165


2,165

2,165

2,165
CIPCIPCIP
225 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA
9,672
1,260

9,672
1,260
10,932

10,932
CIPCIPCIP
3401 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
4,500
22,157
96
4,500
22,253
26,753
812
25,941
1923201835 years
Drexel Academic Tower (6798)PhiladelphiaPA

10,177


10,177
10,177

10,177
CIPCIPCIP
75 N. 38th Street (6799)PhiladelphiaPA
9,432


9,432

9,432

9,432
N/A2019N/A
One uCity DevelopmentPhiladelphiaPA

6,162


6,162
6,162

6,162
CIPCIPCIP
Pittsburgh Phase 1PittsburgPA

28,342


28,342
28,342

28,342
CIPCIPCIP
Pittsburgh Phase 2PittsburgPA

1,999


1,999
1,999

1,999
CIPCIPCIP

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Crown PointJacksonvilleFL
1,300
9,659

1,300
9,659
10,959
1,927
9,032
1997201135 years
Brookdale Jensen BeachJensen BeachFL11,825
1,831
12,820

1,831
12,820
14,651
5,431
9,220
1999200535 years
Brookdale Ormond Beach WestOrmond BeachFL
1,660
9,738

1,660
9,738
11,398
1,957
9,441
1997201135 years
Brookdale Palm CoastPalm CoastFL
470
9,187

470
9,187
9,657
1,861
7,796
1997201135 years
Brookdale PensacolaPensacolaFL
633
6,087

633
6,087
6,720
2,617
4,103
1998200535 years
Brookdale RotondaRotonda WestFL
1,740
4,331

1,740
4,331
6,071
1,043
5,028
1997201135 years
Brookdale Centre Pointe BoulevardTallahasseeFL4,239
667
6,168

667
6,168
6,835
2,652
4,183
1998200535 years
Brookdale TavaresTavaresFL
280
15,980

280
15,980
16,260
3,129
13,131
1997201135 years
Brookdale West Melbourne MCWest MelbourneFL6,041
586
5,481

586
5,481
6,067
2,357
3,710
2000200535 years
Brookdale West Palm BeachWest Palm BeachFL
3,758
33,072

3,758
33,072
36,830
14,400
22,430
1990200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven MCWinter HavenFL
232
3,006

232
3,006
3,238
1,293
1,945
1997200535 years
Brookdale Winter Haven ALWinter HavenFL
438
5,549

438
5,549
5,987
2,386
3,601
1997200535 years
Brookdale Twin FallsTwin FallsID
703
6,153

703
6,153
6,856
2,646
4,210
1997200535 years
Brookdale Lake Shore DriveChicagoIL
11,057
107,517
3,266
11,057
110,783
121,840
47,637
74,203
1990200535 years
Brookdale Lake ViewChicagoIL
3,072
26,668

3,072
26,668
29,740
11,639
18,101
1950200535 years
Brookdale Des PlainesDes PlainesIL32,000
6,871
60,165
(41)6,805
60,190
66,995
26,219
40,776
1993200535 years
Brookdale Hoffman EstatesHoffman EstatesIL
3,886
44,130

3,886
44,130
48,016
18,461
29,555
1987200535 years
Brookdale Lisle IL/ALLisleIL33,000
7,953
70,400

7,953
70,400
78,353
30,621
47,732
1990200535 years
Brookdale NorthbrookNorthbrookIL
1,988
39,762

1,988
39,762
41,750
16,011
25,739
1999200435 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes IL/ALVernon HillsIL
4,439
35,044

4,439
35,044
39,483
15,563
23,920
1987200535 years
Brookdale Hawthorn Lakes ALVernon HillsIL
1,147
10,041

1,147
10,041
11,188
4,376
6,812
1999200535 years
Brookdale EvansvilleEvansvilleIN3,401
357
3,765

357
3,765
4,122
1,619
2,503
1998200535 years
Brookdale CastletonIndianapolisIN
1,280
11,515

1,280
11,515
12,795
4,994
7,801
1986200535 years
Brookdale Marion AL (IN)MarionIN
207
3,570

207
3,570
3,777
1,535
2,242
1998200535 years
Brookdale Portage ALPortageIN
128
3,649

128
3,649
3,777
1,569
2,208
1999200535 years
Brookdale RichmondRichmondIN
495
4,124

495
4,124
4,619
1,773
2,846
1998200535 years
Brookdale DerbyDerbyKS
440
4,422

440
4,422
4,862
911
3,951
1994201135 years
Brookdale Leawood State LineLeawoodKS3,463
117
5,127

117
5,127
5,244
2,205
3,039
2000200535 years
Brookdale Salina FairdaleSalinaKS
300
5,657

300
5,657
5,957
1,166
4,791
1996201135 years
Brookdale TopekaTopekaKS4,638
370
6,825

370
6,825
7,195
2,935
4,260
2000200535 years
Brookdale WellingtonWellingtonKS
310
2,434

310
2,434
2,744
542
2,202
1994201135 years
Brookdale Cushing ParkFraminghamMA
5,819
33,361
2,430
5,819
35,791
41,610
13,440
28,170
1999200435 years
Brookdale Cape CodHyannisMA
1,277
9,063

1,277
9,063
10,340
3,363
6,977
1999200535 years
Brookdale Quincy BayQuincyMA
6,101
57,862

6,101
57,862
63,963
24,877
39,086
1986200535 years
Brookdale DavisonDavisonMI
160
3,189
2,543
160
5,732
5,892
1,630
4,262
1997201135 years
 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition1
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
South Street LandingProvidenceRI
6,358
111,797
(1,261)6,358
110,536
116,894
4,406
112,488
2017201745 years
2/3 Davol SquareProvidenceRI
4,537
6,886
7,116
4,537
14,002
18,539
1,868
16,671
2005201715 years
One Ship StreetProvidenceRI
1,943
1,734
(29)1,943
1,705
3,648
198
3,450
1980201725 years
Brown Academic/R&D BuildingProvidenceRI43,575

68,335


68,335
68,335
423
67,912
2019201935 years
Providence Phase 2ProvidenceRI
2,251


2,251

2,251

2,251
CIPCIPCIP
IRP INorfolkVA
60
20,084
775
60
20,859
20,919
1,702
19,217
2007201655 years
IRP IINorfolkVA
69
21,255
808
69
22,063
22,132
1,781
20,351
2007201655 years
Wexford Biotech 8RichmondVA
2,615
85,514
988
2,615
86,502
89,117
6,318
82,799
2012201735 years
VTR Pre Development Expense  

12,110


12,110
12,110

12,110
CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR LIFE SCIENCES OFFICE BUILDINGS  252,252
126,447
2,042,875
108,745
125,761
2,152,306
2,278,067
150,887
2,127,180
   
TOTAL FOR OFFICE  642,825
510,797
6,303,476
463,765
505,587
6,772,451
7,278,038
1,447,741
5,830,297
   
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES  $2,093,065
$2,278,787
$23,393,356
$1,453,580
$2,283,929
$24,841,794
$27,125,723
$6,197,926
$20,927,797
   

1 Adjustments to basis included provisions for asset impairments, partial dispositions, costs capitalized subsequent to acquisitions and foreign currency translation adjustments.

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale Delta MCDelta TownshipMI
730
11,471

730
11,471
12,201
2,283
9,918
1998201135 years
Brookdale Delta ALDelta TownshipMI
820
3,313

820
3,313
4,133
922
3,211
1998201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills NorthFarmington HillsMI
580
10,497

580
10,497
11,077
2,338
8,739
1994201135 years
Brookdale Farmington Hills North IIFarmington HillsMI
700
10,246

700
10,246
10,946
2,370
8,576
1994201135 years
Brookdale Meridian ALHaslettMI
1,340
6,134

1,340
6,134
7,474
1,351
6,123
1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc MCHollyMI
450
12,373

450
12,373
12,823
2,469
10,354
1998201135 years
Brookdale Grand Blanc ALHollyMI
620
14,627

620
14,627
15,247
2,944
12,303
1998201135 years
Brookdale NorthvilleNorthvilleMI6,820
407
6,068

407
6,068
6,475
2,609
3,866
1996200535 years
Brookdale Troy MCTroyMI
630
17,178

630
17,178
17,808
3,394
14,414
1998201135 years
Brookdale Troy ALTroyMI
950
12,503

950
12,503
13,453
2,634
10,819
1998201135 years
Brookdale Utica ALUticaMI
1,142
11,808

1,142
11,808
12,950
5,077
7,873
1996200535 years
Brookdale Utica MCUticaMI
700
8,657

700
8,657
9,357
1,837
7,520
1995201135 years
Brookdale Eden PrairieEden PrairieMN
301
6,228

301
6,228
6,529
2,678
3,851
1998200535 years
Brookdale FaribaultFaribaultMN
530
1,085

530
1,085
1,615
275
1,340
1997201135 years
Brookdale Inver Grove HeightsInver Grove HeightsMN2,716
253
2,655

253
2,655
2,908
1,142
1,766
1997200535 years
Brookdale MankatoMankatoMN
490
410

490
410
900
195
705
1996201135 years
Brookdale EdinaMinneapolisMN15,040
3,621
33,141
22,975
3,621
56,116
59,737
16,010
43,727
1998200535 years
Brookdale North OaksNorth OaksMN
1,057
8,296

1,057
8,296
9,353
3,567
5,786
1998200535 years
Brookdale PlymouthPlymouthMN
679
8,675

679
8,675
9,354
3,730
5,624
1998200535 years
Brookdale WillmarWilmarMN
470
4,833

470
4,833
5,303
971
4,332
1997201135 years
Brookdale WinonaWinonaMN
800
1,390

800
1,390
2,190
565
1,625
1997201135 years
Brookdale West CountyBallwinMO
3,100
35,074
51
3,104
35,121
38,225
3,873
34,352
2012201435 years
Brookdale EveshamVoorhees TownshipNJ
3,158
29,909

3,158
29,909
33,067
12,861
20,206
1987200535 years
Brookdale WestamptonWestamptonNJ
881
4,741

881
4,741
5,622
2,039
3,583
1997200535 years
Brookdale Santa FeSanta FeNM

28,178


28,178
28,178
11,878
16,300
1986200535 years
Brookdale KenmoreBuffaloNY12,716
1,487
15,170

1,487
15,170
16,657
6,523
10,134
1995200535 years
Brookdale Clinton ILClintonNY
947
7,528

947
7,528
8,475
3,237
5,238
1991200535 years
Brookdale ManliusManliusNY
890
28,237

890
28,237
29,127
5,530
23,597
1994201135 years
Brookdale PittsfordPittsfordNY
611
4,066

611
4,066
4,677
1,748
2,929
1997200535 years
Brookdale East NiskayunaSchenectadyNY
1,021
8,333

1,021
8,333
9,354
3,583
5,771
1997200535 years
Brookdale NiskayunaSchenectadyNY15,895
1,884
16,103

1,884
16,103
17,987
6,924
11,063
1996200535 years
Brookdale SummerfieldSyracuseNY
1,132
11,434

1,132
11,434
12,566
4,916
7,650
1991200535 years
Brookdale WilliamsvilleWilliamsvilleNY6,574
839
3,841

839
3,841
4,680
1,652
3,028
1997200535 years
Brookdale CaryCaryNC
724
6,466

724
6,466
7,190
2,780
4,410
1997200535 years
Brookdale Falling CreekHickoryNC
330
10,981

330
10,981
11,311
2,187
9,124
1997201135 years
Brookdale Winston-SalemWinston-SalemNC
368
3,497

368
3,497
3,865
1,504
2,361
1997200535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Brookdale AllianceAllianceOH2,130
392
6,283

392
6,283
6,675
2,702
3,973
1998200535 years
Brookdale AustintownAustintownOH
151
3,087

151
3,087
3,238
1,327
1,911
1999200535 years
Brookdale BarbertonBarbertonOH
440
10,884

440
10,884
11,324
2,169
9,155
1997201135 years
Brookdale BeavercreekBeavercreekOH
587
5,381

587
5,381
5,968
2,314
3,654
1998200535 years
Brookdale Centennial ParkClaytonOH
630
6,477

630
6,477
7,107
1,351
5,756
1997201135 years
Brookdale WestervilleColumbusOH1,768
267
3,600

267
3,600
3,867
1,548
2,319
1999200535 years
Brookdale Greenville AL/MCGreenvilleOH
490
4,144

490
4,144
4,634
993
3,641
1997201135 years
Brookdale Marion AL/MC (OH)MarionOH
620
3,306

620
3,306
3,926
769
3,157
1998201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (OH)SalemOH
634
4,659

634
4,659
5,293
2,003
3,290
1998200535 years
Brookdale SpringdaleSpringdaleOH
1,140
9,134

1,140
9,134
10,274
1,844
8,430
1997201135 years
Brookdale Bartlesville SouthBartlesvilleOK
250
10,529

250
10,529
10,779
2,073
8,706
1997201135 years
Brookdale BethanyBethanyOK
390
1,499

390
1,499
1,889
374
1,515
1994201135 years
Brookdale Broken ArrowBroken ArrowOK
940
6,312
6,410
1,873
11,789
13,662
2,436
11,226
1996201135 years
Brookdale Forest GroveForest GroveOR
2,320
9,633

2,320
9,633
11,953
2,118
9,835
1994201135 years
Brookdale Mt. HoodGreshamOR
2,410
9,093

2,410
9,093
11,503
2,001
9,502
1988201135 years
Brookdale McMinnville Town CenterMcMinnvilleOR1,051
1,230
7,561

1,230
7,561
8,791
1,837
6,954
1989201135 years
Brookdale Denton NorthDentonTX
1,750
6,712

1,750
6,712
8,462
1,372
7,090
1996201135 years
Brookdale EnnisEnnisTX
460
3,284

460
3,284
3,744
727
3,017
1996201135 years
Brookdale KerrvilleKerrvilleTX
460
8,548

460
8,548
9,008
1,706
7,302
1997201135 years
Brookdale Medical Center WhitbySan AntonioTX
1,400
10,051

1,400
10,051
11,451
2,031
9,420
1997201135 years
Brookdale Western HillsTempleTX
330
5,081

330
5,081
5,411
1,079
4,332
1997201135 years
Brookdale Salem AL (VA)SalemVA
1,900
16,219

1,900
16,219
18,119
6,696
11,423
1998201135 years
Brookdale AlderwoodLynnwoodWA
1,219
9,573

1,219
9,573
10,792
4,117
6,675
1999200535 years
Brookdale Puyallup SouthPuyallupWA9,268
1,055
8,298

1,055
8,298
9,353
3,568
5,785
1998200535 years
Brookdale RichlandRichlandWA
960
23,270

960
23,270
24,230
4,758
19,472
1990201135 years
Brookdale Park PlaceSpokaneWA
1,622
12,895

1,622
12,895
14,517
5,719
8,798
1915200535 years
Brookdale Allenmore ALTacomaWA
620
16,186

620
16,186
16,806
3,209
13,597
1997201135 years
Brookdale Allenmore - ILTacomaWA
1,710
3,326

1,710
3,326
5,036
999
4,037
1988201135 years
Brookdale YakimaYakimaWA
860
15,276

860
15,276
16,136
3,120
13,016
1998201135 years
Brookdale KenoshaKenoshaWI
551
5,431
2,772
551
8,203
8,754
3,077
5,677
2000200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse MCLa CrosseWI
621
4,056
1,126
621
5,182
5,803
2,046
3,757
2004200535 years
Brookdale LaCrosse ALLa CrosseWI
644
5,831
2,637
644
8,468
9,112
3,215
5,897
1998200535 years
Brookdale Middleton Century AveMiddletonWI
360
5,041

360
5,041
5,401
1,016
4,385
1997201135 years
Brookdale OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
250
4,949

250
4,949
5,199
992
4,207
1995201135 years
Brookdale Sun PrairieSun PrairieWI
350
1,131

350
1,131
1,481
283
1,198
1994201135 years
TOTAL FOR BROOKDALE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  199,135
185,427
1,768,730
79,303
186,298
1,847,162
2,033,460
655,647
1,377,813
   
SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES             

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of ChandlerChandlerAZ
4,344
14,455
807
4,439
15,167
19,606
3,095
16,511
2007201235 years
Sunrise of ScottsdaleScottsdaleAZ
2,229
27,575
750
2,255
28,299
30,554
9,100
21,454
2007200735 years
Sunrise at River RoadTucsonAZ
2,971
12,399
435
3,000
12,805
15,805
2,421
13,384
2008201235 years
Sunrise of Lynn ValleyVancouverBC
11,759
37,424
(8,888)9,293
31,002
40,295
9,781
30,514
2002200735 years
Sunrise of VancouverVancouverBC
6,649
31,937
996
6,662
32,920
39,582
10,728
28,854
2005200735 years
Sunrise of VictoriaVictoriaBC
8,332
29,970
(6,486)6,664
25,152
31,816
8,030
23,786
2001200735 years
Sunrise at La CostaCarlsbadCA
4,890
20,590
1,549
5,030
21,999
27,029
7,600
19,429
1999200735 years
Sunrise of CarmichaelCarmichaelCA
1,269
14,598
519
1,284
15,102
16,386
2,963
13,423
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Fair OaksFair OaksCA
1,456
23,679
2,283
2,506
24,912
27,418
8,255
19,163
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA
3,802
24,560
1,515
3,867
26,010
29,877
8,694
21,183
1998200735 years
Sunrise at Canyon CrestRiversideCA
5,486
19,658
1,935
5,577
21,502
27,079
7,140
19,939
2006200735 years
Sunrise of RocklinRocklinCA
1,378
23,565
967
1,411
24,499
25,910
7,971
17,939
2007200735 years
Sunrise of San MateoSan MateoCA
2,682
35,335
1,718
2,705
37,030
39,735
11,782
27,953
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
2,933
34,361
1,186
2,969
35,511
38,480
11,427
27,053
2000200735 years
Sunrise at Sterling CanyonValenciaCA
3,868
29,293
4,732
4,078
33,815
37,893
11,716
26,177
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Westlake VillageWestlake VillageCA
4,935
30,722
1,133
5,031
31,759
36,790
10,254
26,536
2004200735 years
Sunrise at Yorba LindaYorba LindaCA
1,689
25,240
1,631
1,765
26,795
28,560
8,605
19,955
2002200735 years
Sunrise at Cherry CreekDenverCO
1,621
28,370
1,475
1,721
29,745
31,466
9,675
21,791
2000200735 years
Sunrise at PinehurstDenverCO
1,417
30,885
2,090
1,653
32,739
34,392
11,123
23,269
1998200735 years
Sunrise at OrchardLittletonCO
1,813
22,183
1,753
1,853
23,896
25,749
7,996
17,753
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WestminsterWestminsterCO
2,649
16,243
1,696
2,792
17,796
20,588
5,986
14,602
2000200735 years
Sunrise of StamfordStamfordCT
4,612
28,533
2,128
5,029
30,244
35,273
10,237
25,036
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonvilleJacksonvilleFL
2,390
17,671
335
2,420
17,976
20,396
3,541
16,855
2009201235 years
Sunrise at Ivey RidgeAlpharettaGA
1,507
18,516
1,500
1,517
20,006
21,523
6,642
14,881
1998200735 years
Sunrise of Huntcliff Summit IAtlantaGA
4,232
66,161
17,045
4,185
83,253
87,438
28,310
59,128
1987200735 years
Sunrise at Huntcliff Summit IIAtlantaGA
2,154
17,137
2,291
2,160
19,422
21,582
6,668
14,914
1998200735 years
Sunrise at East CobbMariettaGA
1,797
23,420
1,723
1,806
25,134
26,940
8,371
18,569
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BarringtonBarringtonIL
859
15,085
595
892
15,647
16,539
3,114
13,425
2007201235 years
Sunrise of BloomingdaleBloomingdaleIL
1,287
38,625
2,056
1,382
40,586
41,968
12,980
28,988
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Buffalo GroveBuffalo GroveIL
2,154
28,021
1,547
2,339
29,383
31,722
9,652
22,070
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Lincoln ParkChicagoIL
3,485
26,687
2,205
3,504
28,873
32,377
8,753
23,624
2003200735 years
Sunrise of NapervilleNapervilleIL
1,946
28,538
2,639
2,622
30,501
33,123
10,347
22,776
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Palos ParkPalos ParkIL
2,363
42,205
1,278
2,394
43,452
45,846
14,012
31,834
2001200735 years
Sunrise of Park RidgePark RidgeIL
5,533
39,557
2,828
5,677
42,241
47,918
13,668
34,250
1998200735 years
Sunrise of WillowbrookWillowbrookIL
1,454
60,738
2,651
2,080
62,763
64,843
18,572
46,271
2000200735 years
Sunrise on Old MeridianCarmelIN
8,550
31,746
806
8,550
32,552
41,102
6,307
34,795
2009201235 years
Sunrise of LeawoodLeawoodKS
651
16,401
906
768
17,190
17,958
3,146
14,812
2006201235 years
Sunrise of Overland ParkOverland ParkKS
650
11,015
482
660
11,487
12,147
2,368
9,779
2007201235 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Baton RougeBaton RougeLA
1,212
23,547
1,606
1,382
24,983
26,365
8,192
18,173
2000200735 years
Sunrise of ArlingtonArlingtonMA
86
34,393
1,059
107
35,431
35,538
11,655
23,883
2001200735 years
Sunrise of NorwoodNorwoodMA
2,230
30,968
2,053
2,306
32,945
35,251
10,707
24,544
1997200735 years
Sunrise of ColumbiaColumbiaMD
1,780
23,083
2,923
1,918
25,868
27,786
8,298
19,488
1996200735 years
Sunrise of RockvilleRockvilleMD
1,039
39,216
2,660
1,066
41,849
42,915
12,915
30,000
1997200735 years
Sunrise of BloomfieldBloomfield HillsMI
3,736
27,657
1,981
3,860
29,514
33,374
9,478
23,896
2006200735 years
Sunrise of CascadeGrand RapidsMI
1,273
21,782
609
1,364
22,300
23,664
4,256
19,408
2007201235 years
Sunrise of NorthvillePlymouthMI
1,445
26,090
1,365
1,525
27,375
28,900
9,061
19,839
1999200735 years
Sunrise of RochesterRochesterMI
2,774
38,666
1,284
2,846
39,878
42,724
12,877
29,847
1998200735 years
Sunrise of TroyTroyMI
1,758
23,727
928
1,860
24,553
26,413
8,168
18,245
2001200735 years
Sunrise of EdinaEdinaMN
3,181
24,224
2,915
3,270
27,050
30,320
9,050
21,270
1999200735 years
Sunrise on ProvidenceCharlotteNC
1,976
19,472
2,340
1,988
21,800
23,788
7,128
16,660
1999200735 years
Sunrise of East BrunswickEast BrunswickNJ
2,784
26,173
2,252
3,030
28,179
31,209
9,680
21,529
1999200735 years
Sunrise of JacksonJacksonNJ
4,009
15,029
587
4,013
15,612
19,625
3,218
16,407
2008201235 years
Sunrise of Morris PlainsMorris PlainsNJ17,488
1,492
32,052
2,003
1,569
33,978
35,547
11,078
24,469
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Old TappanOld TappanNJ16,241
2,985
36,795
2,032
3,106
38,706
41,812
12,611
29,201
1997200735 years
Sunrise of WallWall TownshipNJ
1,053
19,101
2,022
1,088
21,088
22,176
6,657
15,519
1999200735 years
Sunrise of WayneWayneNJ12,901
1,288
24,990
2,475
1,304
27,449
28,753
8,907
19,846
1996200735 years
Sunrise of WestfieldWestfieldNJ17,095
5,057
23,803
2,119
5,136
25,843
30,979
8,666
22,313
1996200735 years
Sunrise of Woodcliff LakeWoodcliff LakeNJ
3,493
30,801
1,368
3,537
32,125
35,662
10,744
24,918
2000200735 years
Sunrise of North LynbrookLynbrookNY
4,622
38,087
1,985
4,700
39,994
44,694
13,556
31,138
1999200735 years
Sunrise at FleetwoodMount VernonNY
4,381
28,434
2,393
4,531
30,677
35,208
10,289
24,919
1999200735 years
Sunrise of New CityNew CityNY
1,906
27,323
1,764
1,950
29,043
30,993
9,584
21,409
1999200735 years
Sunrise of SmithtownSmithtownNY
2,853
25,621
2,467
3,040
27,901
30,941
9,703
21,238
1999200735 years
Sunrise of Staten IslandStaten IslandNY
7,237
23,910
438
7,288
24,297
31,585
10,408
21,177
2006200735 years
Sunrise at North HillsRaleighNC
749
37,091
5,417
849
42,408
43,257
13,895
29,362
2000200735 years
Sunrise at ParmaClevelandOH
695
16,641
1,214
890
17,660
18,550
5,944
12,606
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Cuyahoga FallsCuyahoga FallsOH
626
10,239
1,542
783
11,624
12,407
4,064
8,343
2000200735 years
Sunrise of AuroraAuroraON
1,570
36,113
(6,664)1,274
29,745
31,019
9,530
21,489
2002200735 years
Sunrise of BurlingtonBurlingtonON
1,173
24,448
832
1,192
25,261
26,453
7,976
18,477
2001200735 years
Sunrise of UnionvilleMarkhamON
2,322
41,140
(7,621)1,908
33,933
35,841
10,824
25,017
2000200735 years
Sunrise of MississaugaMississaugaON
3,554
33,631
(6,495)2,915
27,775
30,690
8,905
21,785
2000200735 years
Sunrise of Erin MillsMississaugaON
1,957
27,020
(5,045)1,593
22,339
23,932
7,338
16,594
2007200735 years
Sunrise of OakvilleOakvilleON
2,753
37,489
1,331
2,759
38,814
41,573
12,186
29,387
2002200735 years
Sunrise of Richmond HillRichmond HillON
2,155
41,254
(7,840)1,733
33,836
35,569
10,658
24,911
2002200735 years
Sunrise of ThornhillVaughanON
2,563
57,513
(8,758)1,420
49,898
51,318
14,898
36,420
2003200735 years
Sunrise of WindsorWindsorON
1,813
20,882
838
1,834
21,699
23,533
6,944
16,589
2001200735 years
Sunrise of AbingtonAbingtonPA22
1,838
53,660
5,116
2,015
58,599
60,614
18,706
41,908
1997200735 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Sunrise of Blue BellBlue BellPA
1,765
23,920
3,101
1,827
26,959
28,786
8,931
19,855
2006200735 years
Sunrise of ExtonExtonPA
1,123
17,765
1,705
1,191
19,402
20,593
6,604
13,989
2000200735 years
Sunrise of HaverfordHaverfordPA6,893
941
25,872
2,217
983
28,047
29,030
9,017
20,013
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Granite RunMediaPA10,609
1,272
31,781
2,344
1,369
34,028
35,397
11,046
24,351
1997200735 years
Sunrise of Lower MakefieldMorrisvillePA
3,165
21,337
587
3,167
21,922
25,089
4,324
20,765
2008201235 years
Sunrise of WesttownWest ChesterPA
1,547
22,996
2,144
1,570
25,117
26,687
8,576
18,111
1999200735 years
Sunrise of HillcrestDallasTX
2,616
27,680
822
2,626
28,492
31,118
9,253
21,865
2006200735 years
Sunrise of Fort WorthFort WorthTX
2,024
18,587
813
2,116
19,308
21,424
3,857
17,567
2007201235 years
Sunrise of FriscoFriscoTX
2,523
14,547
465
2,535
15,000
17,535
2,649
14,886
2009201235 years
Sunrise of Cinco RanchKatyTX
2,512
21,600
1,108
2,580
22,640
25,220
4,382
20,838
2007201235 years
Sunrise at HolladayHolladayUT
2,542
44,771
843
2,581
45,575
48,156
8,639
39,517
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SandySandyUT
2,576
22,987
321
2,618
23,266
25,884
7,755
18,129
2007200735 years
Sunrise of AlexandriaAlexandriaVA
88
14,811
2,260
240
16,919
17,159
6,079
11,080
1998200735 years
Sunrise of RichmondRichmondVA
1,120
17,446
1,205
1,164
18,607
19,771
6,495
13,276
1999200735 years
Sunrise at Bon AirRichmondVA
2,047
22,079
664
2,032
22,758
24,790
4,504
20,286
2008201235 years
Sunrise of SpringfieldSpringfieldVA7,893
4,440
18,834
2,635
4,536
21,373
25,909
7,193
18,716
1997200735 years
TOTAL FOR SUNRISE SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  111,090
245,515
2,532,176
99,539
246,623
2,630,607
2,877,230
819,088
2,058,142
   
ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Arbour LakeCalgaryAB
2,512
39,188
(2,157)2,332
37,211
39,543
4,396
35,147
2003201435 years
Canyon MeadowsCalgaryAB
1,617
30,803
(1,557)1,494
29,369
30,863
3,652
27,211
1995201435 years
Churchill ManorEdmontonAB
2,865
30,482
(1,777)2,647
28,923
31,570
3,622
27,948
1999201435 years
The View at LethbridgeLethbridgeAB
2,503
24,770
(1,545)2,313
23,415
25,728
3,153
22,575
2007201435 years
Victoria ParkRed DeerAB
1,188
22,554
(869)1,098
21,775
22,873
2,966
19,907
1999201435 years
Ironwood EstatesSt. AlbertAB
3,639
22,519
(1,112)3,377
21,669
25,046
2,925
22,121
1998201435 years
Atria RegencyMobileAL
950
11,897
1,387
981
13,253
14,234
3,690
10,544
1996201135 years
Atria Chandler VillasChandlerAZ
3,650
8,450
1,580
3,721
9,959
13,680
3,554
10,126
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Sierra PointeScottsdaleAZ
10,930
65,372
3,269
10,969
68,602
79,571
8,182
71,389
2000201435 years
Atria Campana del RioTucsonAZ
5,861
37,284
2,254
5,972
39,427
45,399
10,250
35,149
1964201135 years
Atria Valley ManorTucsonAZ
1,709
60
819
1,768
820
2,588
417
2,171
1963201135 years
Atria Bell Court GardensTucsonAZ
3,010
30,969
1,969
3,060
32,888
35,948
7,677
28,271
1964201135 years
Longlake ChateauNanaimoBC
1,874
22,910
(1,018)1,738
22,028
23,766
3,011
20,755
1990201435 years
Prince George ChateauPrince GeorgeBC
2,066
22,761
(1,449)1,909
21,469
23,378
2,909
20,469
2005201435 years
The VictorianVictoriaBC
3,419
16,351
(620)3,184
15,966
19,150
2,266
16,884
1988201435 years
The Victorian at McKenzieVictoriaBC
4,801
25,712
(1,529)4,440
24,544
28,984
3,231
25,753
2003201435 years
Atria BurlingameBurlingameCA
2,494
12,373
1,522
2,523
13,866
16,389
3,606
12,783
1977201135 years
Atria Las PosasCamarilloCA
4,500
28,436
1,206
4,518
29,624
34,142
6,855
27,287
1997201135 years
Atria Carmichael OaksCarmichaelCA18,015
2,118
49,694
2,192
2,147
51,857
54,004
8,944
45,060
1992201335 years
Atria El Camino GardensCarmichaelCA
6,930
32,318
14,347
7,210
46,385
53,595
10,402
43,193
1984201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria CovinaCovinaCA
170
4,131
693
250
4,744
4,994
1,509
3,485
1977201135 years
Atria Daly CityDaly CityCA
3,090
13,448
1,113
3,102
14,549
17,651
3,660
13,991
1975201135 years
Atria Covell GardensDavisCA
2,163
39,657
11,064
2,382
50,502
52,884
13,083
39,801
1987201135 years
Atria EncinitasEncinitasCA
5,880
9,212
1,785
5,942
10,935
16,877
2,917
13,960
1984201135 years
Atria North EscondidoEscondidoCA
1,196
7,155
469
1,207
7,613
8,820
1,261
7,559
2002201435 years
Atria Grass ValleyGrass ValleyCA11,218
1,965
28,414
825
2,016
29,188
31,204
5,232
25,972
2000201335 years
Atria Golden CreekIrvineCA
6,900
23,544
1,385
6,930
24,899
31,829
6,383
25,446
1985201135 years
Atria Park of LafayetteLafayetteCA18,916
5,679
56,922
1,137
5,886
57,852
63,738
9,403
54,335
2007201335 years
Atria Del SolMission ViejoCA
3,500
12,458
8,590
3,781
20,767
24,548
5,623
18,925
1985201135 years
Atria Newport PlazaNewport BeachCA
4,534
32,881

4,534
32,881
37,415

37,415
1989201735 years
Atria Tamalpais CreekNovatoCA
5,812
24,703
876
5,831
25,560
31,391
6,040
25,351
1978201135 years
Atria Park of Pacific PalisadesPacific PalisadesCA
4,458
17,064
1,705
4,489
18,738
23,227
6,607
16,620
2001200735 years
Atria Palm DesertPalm DesertCA
2,887
9,843
1,239
3,115
10,854
13,969
4,663
9,306
1988201135 years
Atria HaciendaPalm DesertCA
6,680
85,900
3,291
6,873
88,998
95,871
19,449
76,422
1989201135 years
Atria ParadiseParadiseCA
2,265
28,262
1,090
2,309
29,308
31,617
5,184
26,433
1999201335 years
Atria Del ReyRancho CucamongaCA
3,290
17,427
5,470
3,464
22,723
26,187
7,237
18,950
1987201135 years
Atria RocklinRocklinCA19,221
4,427
52,064
872
4,439
52,924
57,363
5,339
52,024
2001201535 years
Atria La JollaSan DiegoCA
8,210
46,289

8,210
46,289
54,499

54,499
1984201735 years
Atria PenasquitosSan DiegoCA
2,649
23,993

2,649
23,993
26,642

26,642
1991201735 years
Atria CollwoodSan DiegoCA
290
10,650
1,174
338
11,776
12,114
3,218
8,896
1976201135 years
Atria Rancho ParkSan DimasCA
4,066
14,306
1,628
4,613
15,387
20,000
4,566
15,434
1975201135 years
Atria Chateau GardensSan JoseCA
39
487
644
49
1,121
1,170
1,159
11
1977201135 years
Atria Willow GlenSan JoseCA
8,521
43,168
2,931
8,590
46,030
54,620
9,642
44,978
1976201135 years
Atria San JuanSan Juan CapistranoCA
5,110
29,436
8,373
5,318
37,601
42,919
11,978
30,941
1985201135 years
Atria HillsdaleSan MateoCA
5,240
15,956
4,441
5,253
20,384
25,637
4,146
21,491
1986201135 years
Atria Santa ClaritaSanta ClaritaCA
3,880
38,366
932
3,890
39,288
43,178
4,024
39,154
2001201535 years
Atria Bayside LandingStocktonCA

467
660

1,127
1,127
963
164
1998201135 years
Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvaleCA
6,120
30,068
4,920
6,228
34,880
41,108
8,508
32,600
1977201135 years
Atria Park of TarzanaTarzanaCA
960
47,547
889
974
48,422
49,396
7,718
41,678
2008201335 years
Atria Park of Vintage HillsTemeculaCA
4,674
44,341
2,068
4,879
46,204
51,083
8,308
42,775
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Grand OaksThousand OaksCA21,965
5,994
50,309
916
6,055
51,164
57,219
8,886
48,333
2002201335 years
Atria HillcrestThousand OaksCA
6,020
25,635
10,103
6,624
35,134
41,758
11,103
30,655
1987201135 years
Atria Walnut CreekWalnut CreekCA
6,910
15,797
16,728
7,626
31,809
39,435
9,916
29,519
1978201135 years
Atria Valley ViewWalnut CreekCA
7,139
53,914
2,554
7,175
56,432
63,607
19,157
44,450
1977201135 years
Atria Park of ApplewoodLakewoodCO
3,656
48,657
419
3,686
49,046
52,732
8,747
43,985
2008201335 years
Atria Inn at LakewoodLakewoodCO
6,281
50,095
1,593
6,378
51,591
57,969
11,172
46,797
1999201135 years
Atria LongmontLongmontCO
2,807
24,877
994
2,834
25,844
28,678
5,139
23,539
2009201235 years
Atria DarienDarienCT
653
37,587
11,428
1,156
48,512
49,668
10,803
38,865
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Larson PlaceHamdenCT
1,850
16,098
1,778
1,885
17,841
19,726
4,628
15,098
1999201135 years
Atria Greenridge PlaceRocky HillCT
2,170
32,553
2,352
2,388
34,687
37,075
7,751
29,324
1998201135 years
Atria StamfordStamfordCT
1,200
62,432
12,331
1,378
74,585
75,963
15,259
60,704
1975201135 years
Atria StratfordStratfordCT
3,210
27,865
1,828
3,210
29,693
32,903
7,264
25,639
1999201135 years
Atria Crossroads PlaceWaterfordCT
2,401
36,495
7,789
2,577
44,108
46,685
10,926
35,759
2000201135 years
Atria Hamilton HeightsWest HartfordCT
3,120
14,674
3,463
3,158
18,099
21,257
5,434
15,823
1904201135 years
Atria Windsor WoodsHudsonFL
1,610
32,432
2,048
1,687
34,403
36,090
8,650
27,440
1988201135 years
Atria Park of Baypoint VillageHudsonFL
2,083
28,841
8,612
2,350
37,186
39,536
9,753
29,783
1986201135 years
Atria Park of San PabloJacksonvilleFL5,388
1,620
14,920
921
1,660
15,801
17,461
3,764
13,697
1999201135 years
Atria Park of St. Joseph'sJupiterFL15,588
5,520
30,720
1,142
5,557
31,825
37,382
5,675
31,707
2007201335 years
Atria Lady LakeLady LakeFL
3,752
26,265
588
3,766
26,839
30,605
2,708
27,897
2010201535 years
Atria Park of Lake ForestSanfordFL
3,589
32,586
4,027
3,886
36,316
40,202
8,356
31,846
2002201135 years
Atria Evergreen WoodsSpring HillFL
2,370
28,371
3,510
2,533
31,718
34,251
8,911
25,340
1981201135 years
Atria North PointAlpharettaGA40,221
4,830
78,318
1,700
4,856
79,992
84,848
10,973
73,875
2007201435 years
Atria BuckheadAtlantaGA
3,660
5,274
969
3,688
6,215
9,903
2,091
7,812
1996201135 years
Atria MabletonAustellGA
1,911
18,879
479
1,946
19,323
21,269
3,447
17,822
2000201335 years
Atria Johnson FerryMariettaGA
990
6,453
657
995
7,105
8,100
1,895
6,205
1995201135 years
Atria Park of TuckerTuckerGA
1,103
20,679
605
1,120
21,267
22,387
3,756
18,631
2000201335 years
Atria Park of Glen EllynGlen EllynIL
2,455
34,064
3,060
2,634
36,945
39,579
12,230
27,349
2000200735 years
Atria NewburghNewburghIN
1,150
22,880
748
1,150
23,628
24,778
5,335
19,443
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone EastTopekaKS
1,150
20,544
1,018
1,215
21,497
22,712
5,306
17,406
1998201135 years
Atria Hearthstone WestTopekaKS
1,230
28,379
2,322
1,245
30,686
31,931
7,885
24,046
1987201135 years
Atria Highland CrossingCovingtonKY
1,677
14,393
1,440
1,689
15,821
17,510
4,554
12,956
1988201135 years
Atria Summit HillsCrestview HillsKY
1,780
15,769
884
1,789
16,644
18,433
4,255
14,178
1998201135 years
Atria ElizabethtownElizabethtownKY
850
12,510
658
869
13,149
14,018
3,175
10,843
1996201135 years
Atria St. MatthewsLouisvilleKY
939
9,274
1,147
953
10,407
11,360
3,347
8,013
1998201135 years
Atria Stony BrookLouisvilleKY
1,860
17,561
1,177
1,953
18,645
20,598
4,581
16,017
1999201135 years
Atria SpringdaleLouisvilleKY
1,410
16,702
1,255
1,410
17,957
19,367
4,463
14,904
1999201135 years
Atria Marland PlaceAndoverMA
1,831
34,592
19,314
1,996
53,741
55,737
14,791
40,946
1996201135 years
Atria Longmeadow PlaceBurlingtonMA
5,310
58,021
1,483
5,383
59,431
64,814
12,734
52,080
1998201135 years
Atria FairhavenFairhavenMA
1,100
16,093
861
1,148
16,906
18,054
3,868
14,186
1999201135 years
Atria Woodbriar PlaceFalmouthMA15,940
4,630
27,314
5,566
6,433
31,077
37,510
6,341
31,169
2013201335 years
Atria Woodbriar ParkFalmouthMA
1,970
43,693
21,194
2,599
64,258
66,857
11,987
54,870
1975201135 years
Atria Draper PlaceHopedaleMA
1,140
17,794
1,533
1,234
19,233
20,467
4,575
15,892
1998201135 years
Atria Merrimack PlaceNewburyportMA
2,774
40,645
1,896
2,822
42,493
45,315
9,006
36,309
2000201135 years
Atria Marina PlaceQuincyMA
2,590
33,899
1,589
2,755
35,323
38,078
8,150
29,928
1999201135 years
Riverheights TerraceBrandonMB
799
27,708
(1,193)739
26,575
27,314
3,385
23,929
2001201435 years
Amber MeadowWinnipegMB
3,047
17,821
(431)2,817
17,620
20,437
2,685
17,752
2000201435 years
The WesthavenWinnipegMB
871
23,162
(1,222)816
21,995
22,811
2,959
19,852
1988201435 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria ManresaAnnapolisMD
4,193
19,000
1,822
4,465
20,550
25,015
5,052
19,963
1920201135 years
Atria SalisburySalisburyMD
1,940
24,500
780
1,959
25,261
27,220
5,557
21,663
1995201135 years
Atria KennebunkKennebunkME
1,090
23,496
1,127
1,117
24,596
25,713
5,806
19,907
1998201135 years
Atria Park of Ann ArborAnn ArborMI
1,703
15,857
2,055
1,806
17,809
19,615
6,437
13,178
2001200735 years
Atria KinghavenRiverviewMI13,029
1,440
26,260
1,911
1,598
28,013
29,611
6,994
22,617
1987201135 years
Ste. Anne's CourtFrederictonNB
1,221
29,626
(1,214)1,131
28,502
29,633
3,580
26,053
2002201435 years
Chateau de ChamplainSt. JohnNB
796
24,577
(854)747
23,772
24,519
3,174
21,345
2002201435 years
Atria MerryWoodCharlotteNC
1,678
36,892
2,487
1,724
39,333
41,057
9,919
31,138
1991201135 years
Atria Southpoint WalkDurhamNC15,921
2,130
25,920
912
2,135
26,827
28,962
4,921
24,041
2009201335 years
Atria OakridgeRaleighNC14,768
1,482
28,838
1,017
1,519
29,818
31,337
5,435
25,902
2009201335 years
Atria CranfordCranfordNJ25,067
8,260
61,411
4,730
8,382
66,019
74,401
15,581
58,820
1993201135 years
Atria Tinton FallsTinton FallsNJ
6,580
13,258
1,257
6,756
14,339
21,095
4,324
16,771
1999201135 years
Atria SunlakeLas VegasNV
7
732
958
15
1,682
1,697
1,664
33
1998201135 years
Atria SuttonLas VegasNV

863
1,130
48
1,945
1,993
1,697
296
1998201135 years
Atria SevilleLas VegasNV

796
1,452
11
2,237
2,248
1,427
821
1999201135 years
Atria Summit RidgeRenoNV
4
407
546
20
937
957
802
155
1997201135 years
Atria ShakerAlbanyNY
1,520
29,667
1,217
1,626
30,778
32,404
7,071
25,333
1997201135 years
Atria CrossgateAlbanyNY
1,080
20,599
1,089
1,100
21,668
22,768
5,221
17,547
1980201135 years
Atria WoodlandsArdsleyNY45,490
7,660
65,581
2,397
7,718
67,920
75,638
15,345
60,293
2005201135 years
Atria Bay ShoreBay ShoreNY15,275
4,440
31,983
1,853
4,448
33,828
38,276
7,914
30,362
1900201135 years
Atria Briarcliff ManorBriarcliff ManorNY
6,560
33,885
2,003
6,725
35,723
42,448
8,673
33,775
1997201135 years
Atria RiverdaleBronxNY
1,020
24,149
14,480
1,069
38,580
39,649
10,524
29,125
1999201135 years
Atria Delmar PlaceDelmarNY
1,201
24,850
719
1,219
25,551
26,770
3,733
23,037
2004201335 years
Atria East NorthportEast NorthportNY
9,960
34,467
19,448
10,211
53,664
63,875
11,420
52,455
1996201135 years
Atria Glen CoveGlen CoveNY
2,035
25,190
1,123
2,057
26,291
28,348
11,551
16,797
1997201135 years
Atria Great NeckGreat NeckNY
3,390
54,051
19,217
3,390
73,268
76,658
11,785
64,873
1998201135 years
Atria Cutter MillGreat NeckNY
2,750
47,919
2,867
2,761
50,775
53,536
10,914
42,622
1999201135 years
Atria HuntingtonHuntington StationNY
8,190
1,169
2,491
8,232
3,618
11,850
2,056
9,794
1987201135 years
Atria Hertlin PlaceLake RonkonkomaNY
7,886
16,391
1,944
7,886
18,335
26,221
3,768
22,453
2002201235 years
Atria LynbrookLynbrookNY
3,145
5,489
1,187
3,176
6,645
9,821
2,344
7,477
1996201135 years
Atria TanglewoodLynbrookNY24,095
4,120
37,348
935
4,145
38,258
42,403
8,408
33,995
2005201135 years
Atria West 86New YorkNY
80
73,685
5,856
167
79,454
79,621
18,543
61,078
1998201135 years
Atria on the HudsonOssiningNY
8,123
63,089
4,114
8,191
67,135
75,326
16,163
59,163
1972201135 years
Atria PenfieldPenfieldNY
620
22,036
967
723
22,900
23,623
5,383
18,240
1972201135 years
Atria PlainviewPlainviewNY
2,480
16,060
1,590
2,630
17,500
20,130
4,446
15,684
2000201135 years
Atria Rye BrookPort ChesterNY41,514
9,660
74,936
1,944
9,726
76,814
86,540
16,836
69,704
2004201135 years
Atria Kew GardensQueensNY
3,051
66,013
8,272
3,079
74,257
77,336
16,232
61,104
1999201135 years
Atria Forest HillsQueensNY
2,050
16,680
1,244
2,074
17,900
19,974
4,360
15,614
2001201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria GreeceRochesterNY
410
14,967
1,041
639
15,779
16,418
3,893
12,525
1970201135 years
Atria on Roslyn HarborRoslynNY65,000
12,909
72,720
2,231
12,974
74,886
87,860
16,287
71,573
2006201135 years
Atria GuilderlandSlingerlandsNY
1,170
22,414
601
1,171
23,014
24,185
5,225
18,960
1950201135 years
Atria South SetauketSouth SetauketNY
8,450
14,534
1,514
8,832
15,666
24,498
5,403
19,095
1967201135 years
The Court at BrooklinBrooklinON
2,515
35,602
(1,674)2,346
34,097
36,443
4,141
32,302
2004201435 years
Burlington GardensBurlingtonON
7,560
50,744
(3,614)7,009
47,681
54,690
5,602
49,088
2008201435 years
The Court at RushdaleHamiltonON
1,799
34,633
(1,379)1,663
33,390
35,053
4,040
31,013
2004201435 years
Kingsdale ChateauKingstonON
2,221
36,272
(1,383)2,059
35,051
37,110
4,247
32,863
2000201435 years
Crystal View LodgeNepeanON
1,587
37,243
(1,274)1,657
35,899
37,556
4,354
33,202
2000201435 years
The Court at BarrhavenNepeanON
1,778
33,922
(1,218)1,667
32,815
34,482
4,110
30,372
2004201435 years
Stamford EstatesNiagara FallsON
1,414
29,439
(1,744)1,307
27,802
29,109
3,525
25,584
2005201435 years
Sherbrooke HeightsPeterboroughON
2,485
33,747
(1,280)2,300
32,652
34,952
4,122
30,830
2001201435 years
Anchor PointeSt. CatharinesON
8,214
24,056
(1,790)7,593
22,887
30,480
3,259
27,221
2000201435 years
The Court at Pringle CreekWhitbyON
2,965
39,206
(2,173)2,796
37,202
39,998
4,599
35,399
2002201435 years
Atria BethlehemBethlehemPA
2,479
22,870
872
2,492
23,729
26,221
5,905
20,316
1998201135 years
Atria Center CityPhiladelphiaPA
3,460
18,291
15,109
3,475
33,385
36,860
5,427
31,433
1964201135 years
Atria Woodbridge PlacePhoenixvillePA
1,510
19,130
990
1,526
20,104
21,630
4,941
16,689
1996201135 years
Atria South HillsPittsburghPA
880
10,884
764
913
11,615
12,528
3,221
9,307
1998201135 years
La Residence StegerSaint-LaurentQC
1,995
10,926
425
1,884
11,462
13,346
1,912
11,434
1999201435 years
Atria Bay Spring VillageBarringtonRI
2,000
33,400
2,613
2,080
35,933
38,013
9,137
28,876
2000201135 years
Atria HarborhillEast GreenwichRI
2,089
21,702
1,519
2,179
23,131
25,310
5,562
19,748
1835201135 years
Atria Lincoln PlaceLincolnRI
1,440
12,686
1,027
1,475
13,678
15,153
3,755
11,398
2000201135 years
Atria Aquidneck PlacePortsmouthRI
2,810
31,623
865
2,814
32,484
35,298
7,007
28,291
1999201135 years
Atria Forest LakeColumbiaSC
670
13,946
837
684
14,769
15,453
3,451
12,002
1999201135 years
Primrose ChateauSaskatoonSK
2,611
32,729
(1,634)2,484
31,222
33,706
3,885
29,821
1996201435 years
Mulberry EstatesMoose JawSK
2,173
31,791
(1,381)2,103
30,480
32,583
3,829
28,754
2003201435 years
Queen Victoria EstatesReginaSK
3,018
34,109
(1,596)2,789
32,742
35,531
4,019
31,512
2000201435 years
Atria Weston PlaceKnoxvilleTN9,158
793
7,961
1,113
967
8,900
9,867
2,482
7,385
1993201135 years
Atria at the ArboretumAustinTX
8,280
61,764
923
8,342
62,625
70,967
11,628
59,339
2009201235 years
Atria CarrolltonCarrolltonTX6,259
360
20,465
1,270
370
21,725
22,095
5,247
16,848
1998201135 years
Atria GrapevineGrapevineTX
2,070
23,104
789
2,080
23,883
25,963
5,523
20,440
1999201135 years
Atria WestchaseHoustonTX
2,318
22,278
1,075
2,322
23,349
25,671
5,578
20,093
1999201135 years
Atria Cinco RanchKatyTX
3,171
73,287
967
3,176
74,249
77,425
6,972
70,453
2010201535 years
Atria KingwoodKingwoodTX
1,170
4,518
697
1,192
5,193
6,385
1,644
4,741
1998201135 years
Atria at HometownNorth Richland HillsTX
1,932
30,382
1,294
1,963
31,645
33,608
5,945
27,663
2007201335 years
Atria Canyon CreekPlanoTX
3,110
45,999
1,360
3,148
47,321
50,469
8,528
41,941
2009201335 years
Atria RichardsonRichardsonTX
1,590
23,662
1,178
1,600
24,830
26,430
5,570
20,860
1998201135 years
Atria CypresswoodSpringTX
880
9,192
(2,884)897
6,291
7,188
2,466
4,722
1996201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Atria Sugar LandSugar LandTX
970
17,542
885
980
18,417
19,397
4,338
15,059
1999201135 years
Atria CopelandTylerTX
1,879
17,901
874
1,888
18,766
20,654
4,613
16,041
1997201135 years
Atria Willow ParkTylerTX
920
31,271
1,169
982
32,378
33,360
7,815
25,545
1985201135 years
Atria Virginia BeachVirginia BeachVA
1,749
33,004
710
1,754
33,709
35,463
7,919
27,544
1998201135 years
AmberwoodPort RicheyFL
1,320


1,320

1,320

1,320
N/A2011N/A
Atria Development & Construction Fees  

428


428
428

428
CIPCIPCIP
TOTAL FOR ATRIA SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  442,048
548,972
5,010,620
387,770
558,443
5,388,919
5,947,362
1,111,490
4,835,872
   
OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES              
Elmcroft of Grayson ValleyBirminghamAL
1,040
19,145
495
1,046
19,634
20,680
4,174
16,506
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Byrd SpringsHunstvilleAL
1,720
11,270
468
1,723
11,735
13,458
2,733
10,725
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Heritage WoodsMobileAL
1,020
10,241
489
1,020
10,730
11,750
2,526
9,224
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of HalcyonMontgomeryAL
220
5,476
16
220
5,492
5,712
1,748
3,964
1999200635 years
Rosewood ManorScottsboroAL
680
4,038

680
4,038
4,718
847
3,871
1998201135 years
West ShoresHot SpringsAR
1,326
10,904
1,200
1,326
12,104
13,430
3,928
9,502
1988200535 years
Elmcroft of MaumelleMaumelleAR
1,252
7,601
22
1,252
7,623
8,875
2,426
6,449
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of Mountain HomeMountain HomeAR
204
8,971
5
204
8,976
9,180
2,863
6,317
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of SherwoodSherwoodAR
1,320
5,693
24
1,320
5,717
7,037
1,817
5,220
1997200635 years
Chandler Memory Care CommunityChandlerAZ
2,910
8,882
184
3,094
8,882
11,976
1,891
10,085
2012201235 years
Silver Creek Inn Memory Care CommunityGilbertAZ
890
5,918

890
5,918
6,808
1,150
5,658
2012201235 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Green ValleyGreen ValleyAZ
1,227
13,977

1,227
13,977
15,204
1,442
13,762
1998201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu CityLake HavasuAZ
594
14,792

594
14,792
15,386
1,517
13,869
1999201435 years
Lakeview TerraceLake Havasu CityAZ
706
7,810
96
706
7,906
8,612
840
7,772
2009201535 years
Arbor RoseMesaAZ
1,100
11,880
2,434
1,100
14,314
15,414
4,176
11,238
1999201135 years
The StratfordPhoenixAZ
1,931
33,576

1,931
33,576
35,507
3,453
32,054
2001201435 years
Amber Creek Inn Memory CareScottsdaleAZ
2,310
6,322
677
2,185
7,124
9,309
528
8,781
1986201135 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Sierra VistaSierra VistaAZ
295
13,224

295
13,224
13,519
1,353
12,166
1999201435 years
The Woodmark at Sun CitySun CityAZ
964
35,093
531
1,003
35,585
36,588
3,329
33,259
2000201535 years
Rock Creek Memory Care CommunitySurpriseAZ10,228
826
16,353

826
16,353
17,179
45
17,134
2017201735 years
Elmcroft of TempeTempeAZ
1,090
12,942
855
1,090
13,797
14,887
3,143
11,744
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of River CentreTucsonAZ
1,940
5,195
462
1,940
5,657
7,597
1,531
6,066
1999201135 years
Sierra Ridge Memory CareAuburnCA
681
6,071

681
6,071
6,752
643
6,109
2011201435 years
Careage BanningBanningCA
2,970
16,037

2,970
16,037
19,007
3,567
15,440
2004201135 years
Las Villas Del CarlsbadCarlsbadCA
1,760
30,469
3
1,760
30,472
32,232
9,721
22,511
1987200635 years
Prestige Assisted Living at ChicoChicoCA
1,069
14,929

1,069
14,929
15,998
1,537
14,461
1998201435 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villa BonitaChula VistaCA
1,610
9,169

1,610
9,169
10,779
2,137
8,642
1989201135 years
The Meadows Senior LivingElk GroveCA
1,308
19,667

1,308
19,667
20,975
2,047
18,928
2003201435 years
Las Villas Del NorteEscondidoCA
2,791
32,632
17
2,791
32,649
35,440
10,412
25,028
1986200635 years
Alder Bay Assisted LivingEurekaCA
1,170
5,228
(70)1,170
5,158
6,328
1,215
5,113
1997201135 years
CedarbrookFresnoCA
1,652
12,613

1,652
12,613
14,265
353
13,912
2014201735 years
Elmcroft of La MesaLa MesaCA
2,431
6,101

2,431
6,101
8,532
1,946
6,586
1997200635 years
Grossmont GardensLa MesaCA
9,104
59,349
71
9,104
59,420
68,524
18,939
49,585
1964200635 years
Palms, TheLa MiradaCA
2,700
43,919

2,700
43,919
46,619
6,243
40,376
1990201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at LancasterLancasterCA
718
10,459

718
10,459
11,177
1,077
10,100
1999201435 years
Prestige Assisted Living at MarysvilleMarysvilleCA
741
7,467

741
7,467
8,208
772
7,436
1999201435 years
Mountview Retirement ResidenceMontroseCA
1,089
15,449
77
1,089
15,526
16,615
4,933
11,682
1974200635 years
Redwood RetirementNapaCA
2,798
12,639

2,798
12,639
15,437
1,836
13,601
1986201335 years
Prestige Assisted Living at OrovilleOrovilleCA
638
8,079

638
8,079
8,717
833
7,884
1999201435 years
Valencia CommonsRancho CucamongaCA
1,439
36,363

1,439
36,363
37,802
5,154
32,648
2002201335 years
Mission HillsRancho MirageCA
6,800
3,637

6,800
3,637
10,437
1,297
9,140
1999201135 years
Shasta EstatesReddingCA
1,180
23,463

1,180
23,463
24,643
3,330
21,313
2009201335 years
The VistasReddingCA
1,290
22,033

1,290
22,033
23,323
4,555
18,768
2007201135 years
Elmcroft of Point LomaSan DiegoCA
2,117
6,865

2,117
6,865
8,982
2,190
6,792
1999200635 years
Regency of Evergreen ValleySan JoseCA
2,700
7,994

2,700
7,994
10,694
2,222
8,472
1998201135 years
Villa del ObispoSan Juan CapistranoCA
2,660
9,560
331
2,660
9,891
12,551
2,140
10,411
1985201135 years
Villa Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCA
1,219
12,426
3,645
1,219
16,071
17,290
4,468
12,822
1977200535 years
Skyline Place Senior LivingSonoraCA
1,815
28,472

1,815
28,472
30,287
2,977
27,310
1996201435 years
Oak Terrace Memory CareSoulsbyvilleCA
1,146
5,275

1,146
5,275
6,421
568
5,853
1999201435 years
Eagle Lake VillageSusanvilleCA
1,165
6,719

1,165
6,719
7,884
1,199
6,685
2006201235 years
Bonaventure, TheVenturaCA
5,294
32,747

5,294
32,747
38,041
4,719
33,322
2005201335 years
Sterling InnVictorvilleCA12,558
733
18,539

733
18,539
19,272
499
18,773
1992201735 years
Sterling CommonsVictorvilleCA5,850
768
13,124

768
13,124
13,892
355
13,537
1994201735 years
Prestige Assisted Living at VisaliaVisaliaCA
1,300
8,378

1,300
8,378
9,678
873
8,805
1998201435 years
Vista VillageVistaCA
1,630
5,640
61
1,630
5,701
7,331
1,454
5,877
1980201135 years
Rancho VistaVistaCA
6,730
21,828
42
6,730
21,870
28,600
6,966
21,634
1982200635 years
Westminster TerraceWestminsterCA
1,700
11,514
22
1,700
11,536
13,236
2,397
10,839
2001201135 years
Highland TrailBroomfieldCO
2,511
26,431

2,511
26,431
28,942
3,774
25,168
2009201335 years
Caley RidgeEnglewoodCO
1,157
13,133

1,157
13,133
14,290
2,343
11,947
1999201235 years
Garden Square at WestlakeGreeleyCO
630
8,211

630
8,211
8,841
1,775
7,066
1998201135 years
Garden Square of GreeleyGreeleyCO
330
2,735

330
2,735
3,065
606
2,459
1995201135 years
Lakewood EstatesLakewoodCO
1,306
21,137

1,306
21,137
22,443
3,005
19,438
1988201335 years
Sugar Valley EstatesLovelandCO
1,255
21,837

1,255
21,837
23,092
3,103
19,989
2009201335 years
Devonshire AcresSterlingCO
950
13,569
(2,922)965
10,632
11,597
2,330
9,267
1979201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
The Hearth at GardensideBranfordCT
7,000
31,518

7,000
31,518
38,518
6,517
32,001
1999201135 years
The Hearth at Tuxis PondMadisonCT
1,610
44,322

1,610
44,322
45,932
8,768
37,164
2002201135 years
White OaksManchesterCT
2,584
34,507

2,584
34,507
37,091
4,914
32,177
2007201335 years
Willows Care HomeRomfordUK
4,695
6,983
(970)4,305
6,403
10,708
633
10,075
1986201540 years
Cedars Care HomeSouthend-on-SeaUK
2,649
4,925
(628)2,429
4,517
6,946
460
6,486
2014201540 years
Hampton Manor BelleviewBelleviewFL
390
8,337

390
8,337
8,727
1,781
6,946
1988201135 years
Sabal HouseCantonmentFL
430
5,902

430
5,902
6,332
1,236
5,096
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of Coral SpringsCoral SpringsFL
3,280
11,877
689
3,280
12,566
15,846
2,613
13,233
1999201135 years
Stanley HouseDefuniak SpringsFL
410
5,659

410
5,659
6,069
1,184
4,885
1999201135 years
The PeninsulaHollywoodFL
3,660
9,122
1,307
3,660
10,429
14,089
2,277
11,812
1972201135 years
Elmcroft of Timberlin ParcJacksonvilleFL
455
5,905
5
455
5,910
6,365
1,884
4,481
1998200635 years
Forsyth HouseMiltonFL
610
6,503

610
6,503
7,113
1,348
5,765
1999201135 years
Princeton Village of LargoLargoFL
1,718
10,438
153
1,718
10,591
12,309
1,344
10,965
1992201535 years
Barrington Terrace of Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
2,105
18,190
615
2,110
18,800
20,910
2,167
18,743
2001201535 years
Barrington Terrace of NaplesNaplesFL
2,596
18,716
571
2,608
19,275
21,883
2,188
19,695
2004201535 years
The Carlisle NaplesNaplesFL
8,406
78,091

8,406
78,091
86,497
15,720
70,777
1998201135 years
Naples ALZ DevelopmentNaplesFL
2,983


2,983

2,983

2,983
CIPCIPCIP
Hampton Manor at 24th RoadOcalaFL
690
8,767

690
8,767
9,457
1,815
7,642
1996201135 years
Hampton Manor at DeerwoodOcalaFL
790
5,605
3,648
983
9,060
10,043
1,499
8,544
2005201135 years
Las PalmasPalm CoastFL
984
30,009

984
30,009
30,993
4,249
26,744
2009201335 years
Princeton Village of Palm CoastPalm CoastFL
1,958
24,525
42
1,958
24,567
26,525
2,578
23,947
2007201535 years
Outlook Pointe at PensacolaPensacolaFL
2,230
2,362
154
2,230
2,516
4,746
790
3,956
1999201135 years
Magnolia HouseQuincyFL
400
5,190

400
5,190
5,590
1,104
4,486
1999201135 years
Outlook Pointe at TallahasseeTallahasseeFL
2,430
17,745
460
2,430
18,205
20,635
3,871
16,764
1999201135 years
Magnolia PlaceTallahasseeFL
640
8,013
81
640
8,094
8,734
1,627
7,107
1999201135 years
Bristol Park of TamaracTamaracFL
3,920
14,130
718
3,920
14,848
18,768
3,023
15,745
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of CarrolwoodTampaFL
5,410
20,944
634
5,410
21,578
26,988
4,692
22,296
2001201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AthensAthensGA
1,767
16,442
439
1,770
16,878
18,648
1,759
16,889
1998201535 years
Arbor Terrace at CascadeAtlantaGA
3,052
9,040
662
3,057
9,697
12,754
1,440
11,314
1999201535 years
Augusta GardensAugustaGA
530
10,262
308
543
10,557
11,100
2,239
8,861
1997201135 years
Benton House of CovingtonCovingtonGA7,594
1,297
11,397
142
1,297
11,539
12,836
1,271
11,565
2009201535 years
Arbor Terrace of DecaturDecaturGA
3,102
19,599
(1,371)1,292
20,038
21,330
2,053
19,277
1990201535 years
Benton House of DouglasvilleDouglasvilleGA
1,697
15,542
78
1,697
15,620
17,317
1,673
15,644
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of MartinezMartinezGA
408
6,764
5
408
6,769
7,177
2,029
5,148
1997200735 years
Benton House of NewnanNewnanGA
1,474
17,487
157
1,474
17,644
19,118
1,839
17,279
2010201535 years
Elmcroft of RoswellRoswellGA
1,867
15,835
24
1,867
15,859
17,726
1,595
16,131
1997201435 years
Benton Village of StockbridgeStockbridgeGA
2,221
21,989
456
2,227
22,439
24,666
2,411
22,255
2008201535 years
Benton House of Sugar HillSugar HillGA
2,173
14,937
101
2,173
15,038
17,211
1,698
15,513
2010201535 years
Mayflower Care HomeNorthfleetUK
4,330
7,519
(983)3,971
6,895
10,866
695
10,171
2012201540 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Villas of St. James - Breese, ILBreeseIL
671
6,849

671
6,849
7,520
852
6,668
2009201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Chatham, ILChathamIL
1,185
8,910

1,185
8,910
10,095
1,140
8,955
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Effingham, ILEffinghamIL
508
6,624

508
6,624
7,132
801
6,331
2011201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Herrin, ILHerrinIL
2,175
9,605

2,175
9,605
11,780
1,416
10,364
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Marshall, ILMarshallIL
1,461
4,881

1,461
4,881
6,342
837
5,505
2012201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook - Newton, ILNewtonIL
458
4,590

458
4,590
5,048
616
4,432
2011201535 years
Rochester Senior Living at WyndcrestRochesterIL
570
6,536
108
570
6,644
7,214
767
6,447
2005201535 years
Villas of Holly Brook, Shelbyville, ILShelbyvilleIL
2,292
3,351

2,292
3,351
5,643
921
4,722
2011201535 years
Elmcroft of MuncieMuncieIN
244
11,218
4
244
11,222
11,466
3,366
8,100
1998200735 years
Wood RidgeSouth BendIN
590
4,850
(35)590
4,815
5,405
1,059
4,346
1990201135 years
Maples Care HomeBexleyheathUK
5,042
7,525
(1,043)4,624
6,900
11,524
689
10,835
2007201540 years
Barty House Nursing HomeMaidstoneUK
3,769
3,089
(569)3,456
2,833
6,289
407
5,882
2013201540 years
Tunbridge Wells Care CentreTunbridge WellsUK
4,323
5,869
(846)3,964
5,382
9,346
593
8,753
2010201540 years
Elmcroft of Florence (KY)FlorenceKY
1,535
21,826
10
1,535
21,836
23,371
2,182
21,189
2010201435 years
Hartland HillsLexingtonKY
1,468
23,929

1,468
23,929
25,397
3,401
21,996
2001201335 years
Elmcroft of Mount WashingtonMount WashingtonKY
758
12,048
8
758
12,056
12,814
1,204
11,610
2005201435 years
Heathlands Care HomeChingfordUK
5,398
7,967
(1,109)4,950
7,306
12,256
744
11,512
1980201540 years
Heritage WoodsAgawamMA
1,249
4,625

1,249
4,625
5,874
2,404
3,470
1997200430 years
Devonshire EstatesLenoxMA
1,832
31,124

1,832
31,124
32,956
4,423
28,533
1998201335 years
Outlook Pointe at HagerstownHagerstownMD
2,010
1,293
273
2,010
1,566
3,576
539
3,037
1999201135 years
Clover HealthcareAuburnME
1,400
26,895
876
1,400
27,771
29,171
6,014
23,157
1982201135 years
Gorham HouseGorhamME
1,360
33,147
1,472
1,527
34,452
35,979
6,825
29,154
1990201135 years
Kittery EstatesKitteryME
1,531
30,811

1,531
30,811
32,342
4,373
27,969
2009201335 years
Woods at CancoPortlandME
1,441
45,578

1,441
45,578
47,019
6,452
40,567
2000201335 years
Sentry Inn at York HarborYork HarborME
3,490
19,869

3,490
19,869
23,359
4,061
19,298
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of DownriverBrownstown Charter TownshipMI
320
32,652
437
371
33,038
33,409
6,667
26,742
2000201135 years
Independence Village of East LansingEast LansingMI
1,956
18,122
398
1,956
18,520
20,476
3,128
17,348
1989201235 years
Elmcroft of KentwoodKentwoodMI
510
13,976
(3,503)481
10,502
10,983
3,361
7,622
2001201135 years
Primrose AustinAustinMN
2,540
11,707
443
2,540
12,150
14,690
2,369
12,321
2002201135 years
Primrose DuluthDuluthMN
6,190
8,296
257
6,245
8,498
14,743
1,902
12,841
2003201135 years
Primrose MankatoMankatoMN
1,860
8,920
352
1,860
9,272
11,132
1,978
9,154
1999201135 years
Lodge at White BearWhite Bear LakeMN
732
24,999

732
24,999
25,731
3,538
22,193
2002201335 years
Assisted Living at the Meadowlands - O'Fallon, MOO'FallonMO
2,326
14,158

2,326
14,158
16,484
1,760
14,724
1999201535 years
Canyon Creek Inn Memory CareBillingsMT
420
11,217
7
420
11,224
11,644
2,212
9,432
2011201135 years
Spring Creek Inn Alzheimer's CommunityBozemanMT
1,345
16,877

1,345
16,877
18,222
470
17,752
2010201735 years
The Springs at MissoulaMissoulaMT16,500
1,975
34,390
1,375
1,975
35,765
37,740
6,046
31,694
2004201235 years
Carillon ALF of AsheboroAsheboroNC
680
15,370

680
15,370
16,050
3,109
12,941
1998201135 years
Arbor Terrace of AshevilleAshevilleNC
1,365
15,679
532
1,365
16,211
17,576
1,753
15,823
1998201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of Little AvenueCharlotteNC
250
5,077
7
250
5,084
5,334
1,620
3,714
1997200635 years
Carillon ALF of Cramer MountainCramertonNC
530
18,225

530
18,225
18,755
3,710
15,045
1999201135 years
Carillon ALF of HarrisburgHarrisburgNC
1,660
15,130

1,660
15,130
16,790
3,070
13,720
1997201135 years
Carillon ALF of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleNC
2,210
7,372

2,210
7,372
9,582
1,669
7,913
2005201135 years
Carillon ALF of HillsboroughHillsboroughNC
1,450
19,754

1,450
19,754
21,204
3,962
17,242
2005201135 years
Willow GroveMatthewsNC
763
27,544

763
27,544
28,307
3,897
24,410
2009201335 years
Carillon ALF of NewtonNewtonNC
540
14,935

540
14,935
15,475
3,021
12,454
2000201135 years
Independence Village of Olde RaleighRaleighNC
1,989
18,648

1,989
18,648
20,637
3,201
17,436
1991201235 years
Elmcroft of NorthridgeRaleighNC
184
3,592
16
184
3,608
3,792
1,147
2,645
1984200635 years
Carillon ALF of SalisburySalisburyNC
1,580
25,026

1,580
25,026
26,606
4,973
21,633
1999201135 years
Carillon ALF of ShelbyShelbyNC
660
15,471

660
15,471
16,131
3,140
12,991
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of Southern PinesSouthern PinesNC
1,196
10,766
14
1,196
10,780
11,976
2,385
9,591
1998201035 years
Carillon ALF of SouthportSouthportNC
1,330
10,356

1,330
10,356
11,686
2,223
9,463
2005201135 years
Primrose BismarckBismarckND
1,210
9,768
255
1,210
10,023
11,233
2,041
9,192
1994201135 years
Wellington ALF - Minot NDMinotND
3,241
9,509

3,241
9,509
12,750
1,462
11,288
2005201535 years
Crown PointeOmahaNE
1,316
11,950
1,700
1,316
13,650
14,966
4,318
10,648
1985200535 years
Birch HeightsDerryNH
1,413
30,267

1,413
30,267
31,680
4,294
27,386
2009201335 years
Bear Canyon EstatesAlbuquerqueNM
1,879
36,223

1,879
36,223
38,102
5,142
32,960
1997201335 years
The Woodmark at UptownAlbuquerqueNM
2,439
33,276
451
2,451
33,715
36,166
3,404
32,762
2000201535 years
Elmcroft of QuintessenceAlbuquerqueNM
1,150
26,527
426
1,165
26,938
28,103
5,483
22,620
1998201135 years
Prestige Assisted Living at Mira LomaHendersonNV
1,279
12,558

1,279
12,558
13,837
739
13,098
1998201635 years
The AmberleighBuffaloNY
3,498
19,097
5,836
3,498
24,933
28,431
7,058
21,373
1988200535 years
The Hearth at Castle GardensVestalNY
1,830
20,312
2,230
1,885
22,487
24,372
5,685
18,687
1994201135 years
Elmcroft of LimaLimaOH
490
3,368
11
490
3,379
3,869
1,075
2,794
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of OntarioMansfieldOH
523
7,968
12
523
7,980
8,503
2,543
5,960
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of MedinaMedinaOH
661
9,788
7
661
9,795
10,456
3,123
7,333
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of Washington TownshipMiamisburgOH
1,235
12,611
6
1,235
12,617
13,852
4,024
9,828
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of Sagamore HillsSagamore HillsOH
980
12,604
29
980
12,633
13,613
4,023
9,590
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LorainVermilionOH
500
15,461
532
557
15,936
16,493
3,562
12,931
2000201135 years
Gardens at Westlake Senior LivingWestlakeOH
2,401
20,640
128
2,401
20,768
23,169
2,352
20,817
1987201535 years
Elmcroft of XeniaXeniaOH
653
2,801
1
653
2,802
3,455
894
2,561
1999200635 years
Arbor House of MustangMustangOK
372
3,587

372
3,587
3,959
600
3,359
1999201235 years
Arbor House of NormanNormanOK
444
7,525

444
7,525
7,969
1,252
6,717
2000201235 years
Arbor House Reminisce CenterNormanOK
438
3,028

438
3,028
3,466
509
2,957
2004201235 years
Arbor House of Midwest CityOklahoma CityOK
544
9,133

544
9,133
9,677
1,519
8,158
2004201235 years
Mansion at WaterfordOklahoma CityOK
2,077
14,184

2,077
14,184
16,261
2,531
13,730
1999201235 years
Meadowbrook PlaceBaker CityOR
1,430
5,311

1,430
5,311
6,741
566
6,175
1965201435 years
Edgewood DownsBeavertonOR
2,356
15,476

2,356
15,476
17,832
2,227
15,605
1978201335 years
Princeton Village Assisted LivingClackamasOR2,691
1,126
10,283
56
1,126
10,339
11,465
1,137
10,328
1999201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Bayside Terrace Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
498
2,795
423
498
3,218
3,716
317
3,399
2006201535 years
Ocean Ridge Assisted LivingCoos BayOR
2,681
10,941
(94)2,681
10,847
13,528
1,414
12,114
2006201535 years
Avamere at HillsboroHillsboroOR
4,400
8,353
1,209
4,400
9,562
13,962
2,232
11,730
2000201135 years
The Springs at TanasbourneHillsboroOR33,282
4,689
55,035

4,689
55,035
59,724
9,933
49,791
2009201335 years
The Arbor at Avamere CourtKeizerOR
922
6,460
108
1,135
6,355
7,490
808
6,682
2012201435 years
Pelican PointeKlamath FallsOR11,614
943
26,237
113
943
26,350
27,293
2,691
24,602
2011201535 years
The StaffordLake OswegoOR
1,800
16,122
644
1,806
16,760
18,566
3,542
15,024
2008201135 years
The Springs at Clackamas WoodsMilwaukieOR14,755
1,264
22,429

1,264
22,429
23,693
3,944
19,749
1999201235 years
Clackamas Woods Assisted LivingMilwaukieOR7,945
681
12,077

681
12,077
12,758
2,123
10,635
1999201235 years
Pheasant Pointe Assisted LivingMolallaOR
904
7,433
(107)904
7,326
8,230
701
7,529
1998201535 years
Avamere at NewbergNewbergOR
1,320
4,664
588
1,342
5,230
6,572
1,323
5,249
1999201135 years
Avamere Living at Berry ParkOregon CityOR
1,910
4,249
2,298
1,910
6,547
8,457
1,666
6,791
1972201135 years
McLoughlin Place Senior LivingOregon CityOR
2,418
26,819

2,418
26,819
29,237
2,822
26,415
1997201435 years
Avamere at BethanyPortlandOR
3,150
16,740
227
3,150
16,967
20,117
3,605
16,512
2002201135 years
Cedar Village Assisted LivingSalemOR
868
12,652

868
12,652
13,520
1,115
12,405
1999201535 years
Redwood Heights Assisted LivingSalemOR
1,513
16,774
(175)1,513
16,599
18,112
1,513
16,599
1999201535 years
Avamere at SandySandyOR
1,000
7,309
276
1,000
7,585
8,585
1,760
6,825
1999201135 years
Suzanne Elise ALFSeasideOR
1,940
4,027
66
1,940
4,093
6,033
1,160
4,873
1998201135 years
Necanicum VillageSeasideOR
2,212
7,311
52
2,212
7,363
9,575
767
8,808
2001201535 years
Avamere at SherwoodSherwoodOR
1,010
7,051
259
1,010
7,310
8,320
1,707
6,613
2000201135 years
Chateau GardensSpringfieldOR
1,550
4,197

1,550
4,197
5,747
875
4,872
1991201135 years
Avamere at St HelensSt. HelensOR
1,410
10,496
488
1,410
10,984
12,394
2,428
9,966
2000201135 years
Flagstone Senior LivingThe DallesOR
1,631
17,786

1,631
17,786
19,417
1,867
17,550
1991201435 years
Elmcroft of Allison ParkAllison ParkPA
1,171
5,686
8
1,171
5,694
6,865
1,814
5,051
1986200635 years
Elmcroft of ChippewaBeaver FallsPA
1,394
8,586
5
1,394
8,591
9,985
2,740
7,245
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of BerwickBerwickPA
111
6,741
4
111
6,745
6,856
2,151
4,705
1998200635 years
Outlook Pointe at LakemontBridgevillePA
1,660
12,624
205
1,660
12,829
14,489
2,787
11,702
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of DillsburgDillsburgPA
432
7,797

432
7,797
8,229
2,488
5,741
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of AltoonaDuncansvillePA
331
4,729
4
331
4,733
5,064
1,509
3,555
1997200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonPA
240
7,336
4
240
7,340
7,580
2,341
5,239
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of LewisburgLewisburgPA
232
5,666

232
5,666
5,898
1,808
4,090
1999200635 years
Lehigh CommonsMacungiePA
420
4,406
450
420
4,856
5,276
2,504
2,772
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of LoyalsockMontoursvillePA
413
3,412

413
3,412
3,825
1,089
2,736
1999200635 years
Highgate at Paoli PointePaoliPA
1,151
9,079

1,151
9,079
10,230
4,344
5,886
1997200430 years
Elmcroft of Mid ValleyPeckvillePA
619
11,662
3
619
11,665
12,284
1,163
11,121
1998201435 years
Sanatoga CourtPottstownPA
360
3,233

360
3,233
3,593
1,604
1,989
1997200430 years
Berkshire CommonsReadingPA
470
4,301

470
4,301
4,771
2,132
2,639
1997200430 years
Mifflin CourtReadingPA
689
4,265
351
689
4,616
5,305
2,048
3,257
1997200435 years
Elmcroft of ReadingReadingPA
638
4,942
3
638
4,945
5,583
1,577
4,006
1998200635 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Elmcroft of ReedsvilleReedsvillePA
189
5,170
8
189
5,178
5,367
1,650
3,717
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of SaxonburgSaxonburgPA
770
5,949
17
770
5,966
6,736
1,899
4,837
1994200635 years
Elmcroft of ShippensburgShippensburgPA
203
7,634

203
7,634
7,837
2,436
5,401
1999200635 years
Elmcroft of State CollegeState CollegePA
320
7,407
6
320
7,413
7,733
2,364
5,369
1997200635 years
Outlook Pointe at YorkYorkPA
1,260
6,923
216
1,260
7,139
8,399
1,523
6,876
1999201135 years
The Garden HouseAndersonSC7,566
969
15,613
85
969
15,698
16,667
1,705
14,962
2000201535 years
Forest PinesColumbiaSC
1,058
27,471

1,058
27,471
28,529
3,893
24,636
1998201335 years
Elmcroft of Florence SCFlorenceSC
108
7,620
230
108
7,850
7,958
2,441
5,517
1998200635 years
Primrose AberdeenAberdeenSD
850
659
235
850
894
1,744
339
1,405
1991201135 years
Primrose PlaceAberdeenSD
310
3,242
53
310
3,295
3,605
701
2,904
2000201135 years
Primrose Rapid CityRapid CitySD
860
8,722
88
860
8,810
9,670
1,880
7,790
1997201135 years
Primrose Sioux FallsSioux FallsSD
2,180
12,936
315
2,180
13,251
15,431
2,848
12,583
2002201135 years
Ashridge CourtBexhill-on-SeaUK
2,274
4,791
(587)2,085
4,393
6,478
506
5,972
2010201540 years
Inglewood Nursing HomeEastbourneUK
1,908
3,021
(409)1,750
2,770
4,520
368
4,152
2010201540 years
Pentlow Nursing HomeEastbourneUK
1,964
2,462
(367)1,801
2,258
4,059
318
3,741
2007201540 years
Outlook Pointe of BristolBristolTN
470
16,006
315
470
16,321
16,791
3,222
13,569
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Hamilton PlaceChattanoogaTN
87
4,248
9
87
4,257
4,344
1,356
2,988
1998200635 years
Elmcroft of ShallowfordChattanoogaTN
580
7,568
523
582
8,089
8,671
2,047
6,624
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of HendersonvilleHendersonvilleTN
600
5,304
52
600
5,356
5,956
536
5,420
1999201435 years
Regency HouseHixsonTN
140
6,611

140
6,611
6,751
1,379
5,372
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of JacksonJacksonTN
768
16,840
8
768
16,848
17,616
1,679
15,937
1998201435 years
Outlook Pointe at Johnson CityJohnson CityTN
590
10,043
400
590
10,443
11,033
2,075
8,958
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of KingsportKingsportTN
22
7,815
7
22
7,822
7,844
2,494
5,350
2000200635 years
Arbor Terrace of KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
590
15,862
533
590
16,395
16,985
1,778
15,207
1997201535 years
Elmcroft of HallsKnoxvilleTN
387
4,948
10
387
4,958
5,345
496
4,849
1998201435 years
Elmcroft of West KnoxvilleKnoxvilleTN
439
10,697
26
439
10,723
11,162
3,414
7,748
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of LebanonLebanonTN
180
7,086
391
180
7,477
7,657
2,277
5,380
2000200635 years
Elmcroft of BartlettMemphisTN
570
25,552
377
570
25,929
26,499
5,302
21,197
1999201135 years
Kennington PlaceMemphisTN
1,820
4,748
815
1,820
5,563
7,383
1,895
5,488
1989201135 years
The GlenmaryMemphisTN
510
5,860
477
510
6,337
6,847
1,692
5,155
1964201135 years
Outlook Pointe at MurfreesboroMurfreesboroTN
940
8,030
316
940
8,346
9,286
1,724
7,562
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of BrentwoodNashvilleTN
960
22,020
654
960
22,674
23,634
4,862
18,772
1998201135 years
Elmcroft of ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,650
14,060
539
2,650
14,599
17,249
3,304
13,945
1998201135 years
Meadowbrook ALZArlingtonTX
755
4,677
940
755
5,617
6,372
922
5,450
2012201235 years
Elmcroft of AustinAustinTX
2,770
25,820
610
2,770
26,430
29,200
5,536
23,664
2000201135 years
Elmcroft of BedfordBedfordTX
770
19,691
699
770
20,390
21,160
4,351
16,809
1999201135 years
Highland EstatesCedar ParkTX
1,679
28,943

1,679
28,943
30,622
4,112
26,510
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of RivershireConroeTX
860
32,671
714
860
33,385
34,245
6,892
27,353
1997201135 years
Flower MoundFlower MoundTX
900
5,512

900
5,512
6,412
1,170
5,242
1995201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Arbor House GranburyGranburyTX
390
8,186

390
8,186
8,576
1,359
7,217
2007201235 years
Copperfield EstatesHoustonTX
1,216
21,135

1,216
21,135
22,351
3,003
19,348
2009201335 years
Elmcroft of BraeswoodHoustonTX
3,970
15,919
646
3,970
16,565
20,535
3,707
16,828
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of Cy-FairHoustonTX
1,580
21,801
437
1,593
22,225
23,818
4,653
19,165
1998201135 years
Elmcroft of IrvingIrvingTX
1,620
18,755
469
1,620
19,224
20,844
4,119
16,725
1999201135 years
Whitley PlaceKellerTX

5,100
773

5,873
5,873
1,452
4,421
1998200835 years
Elmcroft of Lake JacksonLake JacksonTX
710
14,765
443
710
15,208
15,918
3,316
12,602
1998201135 years
Arbor House LewisvilleLewisvilleTX
824
10,308

824
10,308
11,132
1,719
9,413
2007201235 years
Elmcroft of Vista RidgeLewisvilleTX
6,280
10,548
(12,221)1,921
2,686
4,607
2,150
2,457
1998201135 years
Polo Park EstatesMidlandTX
765
29,447

765
29,447
30,212
4,166
26,046
1996201335 years
Arbor Hills Memory Care CommunityPlanoTX
1,014
5,719

1,014
5,719
6,733
858
5,875
2013201335 years
Arbor House of RockwallRockwallTX
1,537
12,883

1,537
12,883
14,420
2,160
12,260
2009201235 years
Elmcroft of WindcrestSan AntonioTX
920
13,011
586
920
13,597
14,517
3,113
11,404
1999201135 years
Paradise SpringsSpringTX
1,488
24,556

1,488
24,556
26,044
3,490
22,554
2008201335 years
Arbor House of TempleTempleTX
473
6,750

473
6,750
7,223
1,124
6,099
2008201235 years
Elmcroft of CottonwoodTempleTX
630
17,515
439
630
17,954
18,584
3,810
14,774
1997201135 years
Elmcroft of MainlandTexas CityTX
520
14,849
547
520
15,396
15,916
3,355
12,561
1996201135 years
Elmcroft of VictoriaVictoriaTX
440
13,040
445
440
13,485
13,925
2,959
10,966
1997201135 years
Arbor House of WeatherfordWeatherfordTX
233
3,347

233
3,347
3,580
557
3,023
1994201235 years
Elmcroft of WhartonWhartonTX
320
13,799
674
320
14,473
14,793
3,254
11,539
1996201135 years
Mountain RidgeSouth OgdenUT11,218
1,243
24,659

1,243
24,659
25,902
2,516
23,386
2001201435 years
Elmcroft of ChesterfieldRichmondVA
829
6,534
8
829
6,542
7,371
2,085
5,286
1999200635 years
Pheasant RidgeRoanokeVA
1,813
9,027

1,813
9,027
10,840
1,611
9,229
1999201235 years
Cascade Valley Senior LivingArlingtonWA
1,413
6,294

1,413
6,294
7,707
651
7,056
1995201435 years
The Bellingham at OrchardBellinghamWA
3,383
17,553
(81)3,381
17,474
20,855
1,516
19,339
1999201535 years
Bay Pointe RetirementBremertonWA
2,114
21,006
360
2,114
21,366
23,480
2,161
21,319
1999201535 years
Cooks Hill ManorCentraliaWA
520
6,144
35
520
6,179
6,699
1,385
5,314
1993201135 years
Edmonds LandingEdmondsWA
4,273
27,852
(218)4,273
27,634
31,907
2,310
29,597
2001201535 years
The Terrace at Beverly LakeEverettWA
1,515
12,520
(25)1,514
12,496
14,010
1,069
12,941
1998201535 years
The SequoiaOlympiaWA
1,490
13,724
108
1,490
13,832
15,322
2,931
12,391
1995201135 years
Bishop Place Senior LivingPullmanWA
1,780
33,608

1,780
33,608
35,388
3,415
31,973
1998201435 years
Willow GardensPuyallupWA
1,959
35,492

1,959
35,492
37,451
5,041
32,410
1996201335 years
BirchviewSedro-WoolleyWA
210
14,145
98
210
14,243
14,453
2,782
11,671
1996201135 years
Discovery Memory careSequimWA
320
10,544
132
320
10,676
10,996
2,171
8,825
1961201135 years
The Village Retirement & Assisted LivingTacomaWA
2,200
5,938
637
2,200
6,575
8,775
1,618
7,157
1976201135 years
Clearwater SpringsVancouverWA
1,269
9,840
193
1,269
10,033
11,302
1,188
10,114
2003201535 years
Matthews of Appleton IAppletonWI
130
1,834
(41)130
1,793
1,923
411
1,512
1996201135 years
Matthews of Appleton IIAppletonWI
140
2,016
301
140
2,317
2,457
484
1,973
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Hunters RidgeBeaver DamWI
260
2,380

260
2,380
2,640
522
2,118
1998201135 years
Harbor House BeloitBeloitWI
150
4,356
427
191
4,742
4,933
916
4,017
1990201135 years
Harbor House ClintonClintonWI
290
4,390

290
4,390
4,680
889
3,791
1991201135 years
CreeksideCudahyWI
760
1,693

760
1,693
2,453
401
2,052
2001201135 years
Harbor House Eau ClaireEau ClaireWI
210
6,259

210
6,259
6,469
1,242
5,227
1996201135 years
Chapel ValleyFitchburgWI
450
2,372

450
2,372
2,822
527
2,295
1998201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IIFox PointWI
1,810
943
37
1,820
970
2,790
310
2,480
1999201135 years
Laurel OaksGlendaleWI
2,390
43,587
3,556
2,510
47,023
49,533
9,097
40,436
1988201135 years
Layton TerraceGreenfieldWI
3,490
39,201
382
3,480
39,593
43,073
8,084
34,989
1999201135 years
Matthews of HartlandHartlandWI
640
1,663
43
652
1,694
2,346
467
1,879
1985201135 years
Matthews of HoriconHoriconWI
340
3,327
(95)345
3,227
3,572
801
2,771
2002201135 years
JeffersonJeffersonWI
330
2,384

330
2,384
2,714
523
2,191
1997201135 years
Harbor House KenoshaKenoshaWI
710
3,254
3,641
1,156
6,449
7,605
1,031
6,574
1996201135 years
Harbor House ManitowocManitowocWI
140
1,520

140
1,520
1,660
324
1,336
1997201135 years
Adare IIMenashaWI
110
537
(493)94
60
154
154

1994201135 years
Adare IVMenashaWI
110
537
(503)94
50
144
144

1994201135 years
Adare IIIMenashaWI
90
557
(493)65
89
154
154

1993201135 years
Adare IMenashaWI
90
557
(500)74
73
147
147

1993201135 years
The ArboretumMenomonee FallsWI
5,640
49,083
1,813
5,640
50,896
56,536
10,640
45,896
1989201135 years
Matthews of Milwaukee IMilwaukeeWI
1,800
935
119
1,800
1,054
2,854
323
2,531
1999201135 years
Hart Park SquareMilwaukeeWI
1,900
21,628
34
1,900
21,662
23,562
4,462
19,100
2005201135 years
Harbor House MonroeMonroeWI
490
4,964

490
4,964
5,454
1,018
4,436
1990201135 years
Matthews of Neenah INeenahWI
710
1,157
64
713
1,218
1,931
342
1,589
2006201135 years
Matthews of Neenah IINeenahWI
720
2,339
(50)720
2,289
3,009
583
2,426
2007201135 years
Matthews of Irish RoadNeenahWI
320
1,036
87
320
1,123
1,443
322
1,121
2001201135 years
Matthews of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
800
2,167
(2)812
2,153
2,965
515
2,450
1997201135 years
Azura Memory Care of Oak CreekOak CreekWI
727
6,254

727
6,254
6,981
120
6,861
2017201735 years
Harbor House OconomowocOconomowocWI
400
1,596
4,674
709
5,961
6,670
497
6,173
2016201535 years
Wilkinson Woods of OconomowocOconomowocWI
1,100
12,436
157
1,100
12,593
13,693
2,557
11,136
1992201135 years
Harbor House OshkoshOshkoshWI
190
949

190
949
1,139
256
883
1993201135 years
Matthews of PewaukeePewaukeeWI
1,180
4,124
206
1,197
4,313
5,510
1,060
4,450
2001201135 years
Harbor House SheboyganSheboyganWI
1,060
6,208

1,060
6,208
7,268
1,249
6,019
1995201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis ISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,428
(113)1,389
1,296
2,685
369
2,316
2000201135 years
Matthews of St. Francis IISt. FrancisWI
1,370
1,666
15
1,377
1,674
3,051
428
2,623
2000201135 years
Howard Village of St. FrancisSt. FrancisWI
2,320
17,232

2,320
17,232
19,552
3,628
15,924
2001201135 years
Harbor House StoughtonStoughtonWI
450
3,191

450
3,191
3,641
702
2,939
1992201135 years
Oak Hill TerraceWaukeshaWI
2,040
40,298
440
2,040
40,738
42,778
8,320
34,458
1985201135 years
Harbor House Rib MountainWausauWI
350
3,413

350
3,413
3,763
707
3,056
1997201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Library SquareWest AllisWI
1,160
23,714

1,160
23,714
24,874
4,868
20,006
1996201135 years
Matthews of WrightstownWrightstownWI
140
376
12
140
388
528
148
380
1999201135 years
Madison HouseKirklandWA
4,291
26,787

4,291
26,787
31,078
755
30,323
1978201735 years
Delaware PlazaLongviewWA4,189
620
5,116

620
5,116
5,736
142
5,594
1972201735 years
Canterbury GardensLongviewWA5,586
444
13,698

444
13,698
14,142
364
13,778
1998201735 years
Canterbury InnLongviewWA14,568
1,462
34,507

1,462
34,507
35,969
893
35,076
1989201735 years
Canterbury ParkLongviewWA
969
30,109

969
30,109
31,078
834
30,244
2000201735 years
Cascade InnVancouverWA12,378
3,201
18,996

3,201
18,996
22,197
535
21,662
1979201735 years
The Hampton & Ashley InnVancouverWA
1,855
21,047

1,855
21,047
22,902
581
22,321
1992201735 years
The Hampton at Salmon CreekVancouverWA11,872
1,256
21,686

1,256
21,686
22,942
418
22,524
2013201735 years
Outlook Pointe at Teays ValleyHurricaneWV
1,950
14,489
300
1,950
14,789
16,739
2,912
13,827
1999201135 years
Elmcroft of MartinsburgMartinsburgWV
248
8,320
9
248
8,329
8,577
2,655
5,922
1999200635 years
Garden Square Assisted Living of CasperCasperWY
355
3,197

355
3,197
3,552
628
2,924
1996201135 years
Whispering ChaseCheyenneWY
1,800
20,354

1,800
20,354
22,154
2,904
19,250
2008201335 years
Hampton CareHamptonUK
3,923
27,637

3,923
27,637
31,560
485
31,075
2007201740 years
Parkfield House Nursing HomeUxbridgeUK
1,880
960

1,880
960
2,840
21
2,819
2000201740 years
TOTAL FOR OTHER SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  190,394
519,074
4,646,262
52,129
511,585
4,705,880
5,217,465
831,359
4,386,106
   
TOTAL FOR SENIORS HOUSING COMMUNITIES  942,667
1,498,988
13,957,788
618,741
1,502,949
14,572,568
16,075,517
3,417,584
12,657,933
   
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS              
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #46BirminghamAL

25,298
4,061

29,359
29,359
8,989
20,370
2005201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #48BirminghamAL

12,698
509

13,207
13,207
3,641
9,566
1989201035 years
St. Vincent's Medical Center East #52BirminghamAL

7,608
1,461

9,069
9,069
3,071
5,998
1985201035 years
Crestwood Medical PavilionHuntsvilleAL3,226
625
16,178
159
625
16,337
16,962
3,804
13,158
1994201135 years
Davita Dialysis - Marked TreeMarked TreeAR
179
1,580

179
1,580
1,759
190
1,569
2009201535 years
West Valley Medical CenterBuckeyeAZ
3,348
5,233

3,348
5,233
8,581
775
7,806
2011201531 years
Canyon Springs Medical PlazaGilbertAZ

27,497
532

28,029
28,029
5,939
22,090
2007201235 years
Mercy Gilbert Medical PlazaGilbertAZ7,330
720
11,277
1,068
720
12,345
13,065
3,281
9,784
2007201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical PlazaGlendaleAZ

12,904
871
20
13,755
13,775
2,927
10,848
1997201135 years
Thunderbird Paseo Medical Plaza IIGlendaleAZ

8,100
516
20
8,596
8,616
1,972
6,644
2001201135 years
Desert Medical PavilionMesaAZ

32,768
501

33,269
33,269
4,933
28,336
2003201335 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IMesaAZ

11,923
677
4
12,596
12,600
2,630
9,970
1977201135 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IIMesaAZ

7,395
405
4
7,796
7,800
1,800
6,000
1980201135 years
Desert Samaritan Medical Building IIIMesaAZ

13,665
1,203

14,868
14,868
3,219
11,649
1986201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIPhoenixAZ

22,663
626
14
23,275
23,289
4,866
18,423
2002201135 years
Deer Valley Medical Office Building IIIPhoenixAZ

19,521
287
12
19,796
19,808
4,239
15,569
2009201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Papago Medical ParkPhoenixAZ

12,172
1,561

13,733
13,733
2,983
10,750
1989201135 years
North Valley Orthopedic Surgery CenterPhoenixAZ
2,800
10,150

2,800
10,150
12,950
1,126
11,824
2006201535 years
Burbank Medical PlazaBurbankCA
1,241
23,322
1,149
1,268
24,444
25,712
6,084
19,628
2004201135 years
Burbank Medical Plaza IIBurbankCA33,726
491
45,641
382
497
46,017
46,514
9,744
36,770
2008201135 years
Eden Medical PlazaCastro ValleyCA
258
2,455
394
328
2,779
3,107
1,147
1,960
1998201125 years
Sutter Medical CenterCastro ValleyCA

25,088
1,387

26,475
26,475
3,810
22,665
2012201235 years
United Healthcare - CypressCypressCA
12,883
38,309

12,883
38,309
51,192
5,414
45,778
1985201529 years
NorthBay Corporate HeadquartersFairfieldCA

19,187


19,187
19,187
3,061
16,126
2008201235 years
Gateway Medical PlazaFairfieldCA

12,872
65

12,937
12,937
2,054
10,883
1986201235 years
Solano NorthBay Health PlazaFairfieldCA

8,880
39

8,919
8,919
1,410
7,509
1990201235 years
NorthBay Healthcare MOBFairfieldCA

8,507
2,280

10,787
10,787
2,073
8,714
2014201335 years
UC Davis MedicalFolsomCA
1,873
10,156
13
1,873
10,169
12,042
1,225
10,817
1995201535 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg IGlendaleCA
6,683
9,589
1,725
6,693
11,304
17,997
3,377
14,620
1972201223 years
Verdugo Hills Professional Bldg IIGlendaleCA
4,464
3,731
2,359
4,469
6,085
10,554
2,079
8,475
1987201219 years
Grossmont Medical TerraceLa MesaCA
88
14,192
126
88
14,318
14,406
850
13,556
2008201635 years
St. Francis Lynwood MedicalLynwoodCA
688
8,385
1,471
697
9,847
10,544
3,210
7,334
1993201132 years
PMB Mission HillsMission HillsCA
15,468
30,116
4,729
15,468
34,845
50,313
5,086
45,227
2012201235 years
PDP Mission ViejoMission ViejoCA56,345
1,916
77,022
959
1,916
77,981
79,897
17,040
62,857
2007201135 years
PDP OrangeOrangeCA44,896
1,752
61,647
1,351
1,761
62,989
64,750
13,922
50,828
2008201135 years
NHP/PMB PasadenaPasadenaCA
3,138
83,412
9,199
3,138
92,611
95,749
24,033
71,716
2009201135 years
Western University of Health Sciences Medical PavilionPomonaCA
91
31,523

91
31,523
31,614
6,547
25,067
2009201135 years
Pomerado Outpatient PavilionPowayCA
3,233
71,435
3,000
3,233
74,435
77,668
17,861
59,807
2007201135 years
Sutter Van NessSan FranciscoCA34,675

84,520


84,520
84,520

84,520
CIPCIPCIP
San Gabriel Valley MedicalSan GabrielCA
914
5,510
725
950
6,199
7,149
2,201
4,948
2004201135 years
Santa Clarita Valley MedicalSanta ClaritaCA22,236
9,708
20,020
1,500
9,782
21,446
31,228
5,104
26,124
2005201135 years
Kenneth E Watts Medical PlazaTorranceCA
262
6,945
2,462
334
9,335
9,669
3,224
6,445
1989201123 years
Vaca Valley Health PlazaVacavilleCA

9,634
612

10,246
10,246
1,516
8,730
1988201235 years
Potomac Medical PlazaAuroraCO
2,401
9,118
3,162
2,800
11,881
14,681
5,655
9,026
1986200735 years
Briargate Medical CampusColorado SpringsCO
1,238
12,301
442
1,259
12,722
13,981
4,710
9,271
2002200735 years
Printers Park Medical PlazaColorado SpringsCO
2,641
47,507
1,828
2,641
49,335
51,976
17,936
34,040
1999200735 years
Green Valley Ranch MOBDenverCO5,485

12,139
1,011
235
12,915
13,150
1,841
11,309
2007201235 years
Community Physicians PavilionLafayetteCO

10,436
1,757

12,193
12,193
3,552
8,641
2004201035 years
Exempla Good Samaritan Medical CenterLafayetteCO

4,393
(75)
4,318
4,318
504
3,814
2013201335 years
Dakota RidgeLittletonCO
2,540
12,901
356
2,540
13,257
15,797
1,432
14,365
2007201535 years
Avista Two Medical PlazaLouisvilleCO

17,330
1,811

19,141
19,141
6,242
12,899
2003200935 years
The Sierra Medical BuildingParkerCO
1,444
14,059
3,287
1,492
17,298
18,790
6,712
12,078
2009200935 years
Crown Point Healthcare PlazaParkerCO
852
5,210
109
852
5,319
6,171
860
5,311
2008201335 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIWheat RidgeCO

2,655
1,253

3,908
3,908
1,365
2,543
1976201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IVWheat RidgeCO

7,266
1,947

9,213
9,213
2,553
6,660
1991201035 years
Lutheran Medical Office Building IIIWheat RidgeCO

11,947
1,094

13,041
13,041
3,328
9,713
2004201035 years
DePaul Professional Office BuildingWashingtonDC

6,424
2,297

8,721
8,721
3,376
5,345
1987201035 years
Providence Medical Office BuildingWashingtonDC

2,473
970

3,443
3,443
1,452
1,991
1975201035 years
RTS ArcadiaArcadiaFL
345
2,884

345
2,884
3,229
770
2,459
1993201130 years
NorthBay Center For Primary Care - VacavilleVacavilleCA
777
5,632

777
5,632
6,409
47
6,362
1998201735 years
Aventura Medical PlazaAventuraFL
401
3,338
49
401
3,387
3,788
675
3,113
1996201526 years
RTS Cape CoralCape CoralFL
368
5,448

368
5,448
5,816
1,229
4,587
1984201134 years
RTS EnglewoodEnglewoodFL
1,071
3,516

1,071
3,516
4,587
851
3,736
1992201135 years
RTS Ft. MyersFort MyersFL
1,153
4,127

1,153
4,127
5,280
1,117
4,163
1989201131 years
RTS Key WestKey WestFL
486
4,380

486
4,380
4,866
880
3,986
1987201135 years
JFK Medical PlazaLake WorthFL
453
1,711
303
453
2,014
2,467
799
1,668
1999200435 years
East Pointe Medical PlazaLehigh AcresFL
327
11,816

327
11,816
12,143
1,210
10,933
1994201535 years
Palms West Building 6LoxahatcheeFL
965
2,678
156
965
2,834
3,799
1,094
2,705
2000200435 years
Bay Medical PlazaLynn HavenFL
4,215
15,041
3
4,215
15,044
19,259
1,771
17,488
2003201535 years
Aventura Heart & HealthMiamiFL15,023

25,361
3,030

28,391
28,391
11,656
16,735
2006200735 years
RTS NaplesNaplesFL
1,152
3,726

1,152
3,726
4,878
851
4,027
1999201135 years
Bay Medical CenterPanama CityFL
82
17,400
3
82
17,403
17,485
1,779
15,706
1987201535 years
Woodlands Center for Specialized MedPensacolaFL14,073
2,518
24,006
30
2,518
24,036
26,554
5,399
21,155
2009201235 years
RTS Pt. CharlottePt CharlotteFL
966
4,581

966
4,581
5,547
1,097
4,450
1985201134 years
RTS SarasotaSarasotaFL
1,914
3,889

1,914
3,889
5,803
982
4,821
1996201135 years
Capital Regional MOB ITallahasseeFL
590
8,773
59
590
8,832
9,422
812
8,610
1998201535 years
University Medical Office BuildingTamaracFL

6,690
393
5
7,078
7,083
2,755
4,328
2006200735 years
RTS VeniceVeniceFL
1,536
4,104

1,536
4,104
5,640
997
4,643
1997201135 years
Athens Medical ComplexAthensGA
2,826
18,339
7
2,826
18,346
21,172
1,957
19,215
2011201535 years
Doctors Center at St. Joseph's HospitalAtlantaGA
545
80,152
4,735
545
84,887
85,432
10,025
75,407
1978201520 years
Augusta POB IAugustaGA
233
7,894
1,479
233
9,373
9,606
4,403
5,203
1978201214 years
Augusta POB IIAugustaGA
735
13,717
1,049
735
14,766
15,501
5,024
10,477
1987201223 years
Augusta POB IIIAugustaGA
535
3,857
664
535
4,521
5,056
1,845
3,211
1994201222 years
Augusta POB IVAugustaGA
675
2,182
2,115
691
4,281
4,972
1,519
3,453
1995201223 years
Cobb Physicians CenterAustellGA
1,145
16,805
1,228
1,145
18,033
19,178
5,249
13,929
1992201135 years
Summit Professional Plaza IBrunswickGA
1,821
2,974
124
1,821
3,098
4,919
3,016
1,903
2004201231 years
Summit Professional Plaza IIBrunswickGA
981
13,818
33
981
13,851
14,832
3,380
11,452
1998201235 years
Fayette MOBFayettevilleGA
895
20,669
372
895
21,041
21,936
2,164
19,772
2004201535 years
Woodlawn Commons 1121/1163MariettaGA
5,495
16,028
1,150
5,540
17,133
22,673
1,872
20,801
1991201535 years
PAPP ClinicNewnanGA
2,167
5,477
68
2,167
5,545
7,712
851
6,861
1994201530 years
Parkway Physicians CenterRinggoldGA
476
10,017
668
476
10,685
11,161
3,018
8,143
2004201135 years
Riverdale MOBRiverdaleGA
1,025
9,783
15
1,025
9,798
10,823
1,161
9,662
2005201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Rush Copley POB IAuroraIL
120
27,882
449
120
28,331
28,451
2,927
25,524
1996201534 years
Rush Copley POB IIAuroraIL
49
27,217
457
49
27,674
27,723
2,785
24,938
2009201535 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IBarringtonIL
152
3,224
227
152
3,451
3,603
521
3,082
1979201335 years
Good Shepherd Physician Office Building IIBarringtonIL
512
12,977
438
512
13,415
13,927
2,092
11,835
1996201335 years
Trinity Hospital Physician Office BuildingChicagoIL
139
3,329
1,121
139
4,450
4,589
656
3,933
1971201335 years
Advocate Beverly CenterChicagoIL
2,227
10,140
14
2,231
10,150
12,381
1,578
10,803
1986201525 years
Crystal Lakes Medical ArtsCrystal LakeIL
2,490
19,504
42
2,523
19,513
22,036
2,237
19,799
2007201535 years
Advocate Good ShepherdCrystal LakeIL
2,444
10,953
112
2,444
11,065
13,509
1,452
12,057
2008201533 years
Physicians Plaza EastDecaturIL

791
1,894

2,685
2,685
756
1,929
1976201035 years
Physicians Plaza WestDecaturIL

1,943
597

2,540
2,540
938
1,602
1987201035 years
SIU Family PracticeDecaturIL

3,900
3,773

7,673
7,673
1,951
5,722
1996201035 years
304 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

8,702
615
29
9,288
9,317
2,753
6,564
2002201035 years
302 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

3,467
444

3,911
3,911
1,384
2,527
1993201035 years
ENTADecaturIL

1,150
16

1,166
1,166
415
751
1996201035 years
301 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL

640


640
640
319
321
1980201035 years
South Shore Medical BuildingDecaturIL
902
129
56
958
129
1,087
198
889
1991201035 years
Kenwood Medical CenterDecaturIL

1,689
1,505

3,194
3,194
661
2,533
1997201035 years
Corporate Health ServicesDecaturIL
934
1,386

934
1,386
2,320
614
1,706
1996201035 years
Rock Springs MedicalDecaturIL
399
495

399
495
894
234
660
1990201035 years
575 W Hay BuildingDecaturIL
111
739
24
111
763
874
293
581
1984201035 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IDowners GroveIL
407
10,337
791
407
11,128
11,535
1,645
9,890
1976201335 years
Good Samaritan Physician Office Building IIDowners GroveIL
1,013
25,370
785
1,013
26,155
27,168
3,922
23,246
1995201335 years
Eberle Medical Office Building ("Eberle MOB")Elk Grove VillageIL

16,315
404

16,719
16,719
6,415
10,304
2005200935 years
1425 Hunt Club Road MOBGurneeIL
249
1,452
824
249
2,276
2,525
592
1,933
2005201134 years
1445 Hunt Club DriveGurneeIL
216
1,405
353
216
1,758
1,974
783
1,191
2002201131 years
Gurnee Imaging CenterGurneeIL
82
2,731

82
2,731
2,813
655
2,158
2002201135 years
Gurnee Center ClubGurneeIL
627
17,851

627
17,851
18,478
4,497
13,981
2001201135 years
South Suburban Hospital Physician Office BuildingHazel CrestIL
191
4,370
225
191
4,595
4,786
779
4,007
1989201335 years
755 Milwaukee MOBLibertyvilleIL
421
3,716
1,665
630
5,172
5,802
2,672
3,130
1990201118 years
890 Professional MOBLibertyvilleIL
214
2,630
276
214
2,906
3,120
1,018
2,102
1980201126 years
Libertyville Center ClubLibertyvilleIL
1,020
17,176

1,020
17,176
18,196
4,445
13,751
1988201135 years
Christ Medical Center Physician Office BuildingOak LawnIL
658
16,421
1,066
658
17,487
18,145
2,487
15,658
1986201335 years
Methodist North MOBPeoriaIL
1,025
29,493

1,025
29,493
30,518
3,071
27,447
2010201535 years
Davita Dialysis - RockfordRockfordIL
256
2,543

256
2,543
2,799
312
2,487
2009201535 years
Round Lake ACCRound LakeIL
758
370
378
799
707
1,506
551
955
1984201113 years
Vernon Hills Acute Care CenterVernon HillsIL
3,376
694
264
3,413
921
4,334
668
3,666
1986201115 years
Wilbur S. Roby BuildingAndersonIN

2,653
870

3,523
3,523
1,397
2,126
1992201035 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Ambulatory Services BuildingAndersonIN

4,266
1,733

5,999
5,999
2,271
3,728
1995201035 years
St. John's Medical Arts BuildingAndersonIN

2,281
1,450

3,731
3,731
1,148
2,583
1973201035 years
Carmel ICarmelIN
466
5,954
610
466
6,564
7,030
1,831
5,199
1985201230 years
Carmel IICarmelIN
455
5,976
704
455
6,680
7,135
1,644
5,491
1989201233 years
Carmel IIICarmelIN
422
6,194
662
422
6,856
7,278
1,551
5,727
2001201235 years
ElkhartElkhartIN
1,256
1,973

1,256
1,973
3,229
1,111
2,118
1994201132 years
Lutheran Medical ArtsFort WayneIN
702
13,576
47
702
13,623
14,325
1,481
12,844
2000201535 years
Dupont Road MOBFort WayneIN
633
13,479
154
672
13,594
14,266
1,583
12,683
2001201535 years
Harcourt Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
519
28,951
2,419
519
31,370
31,889
8,030
23,859
1973201228 years
Cardiac Professional Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
498
27,430
1,128
498
28,558
29,056
5,919
23,137
1995201235 years
Oncology Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
470
5,703
230
470
5,933
6,403
1,642
4,761
2003201235 years
CorVasc Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN
514
9,617
14
514
9,631
10,145
562
9,583
2004201636 years
St. Francis South Medical Office BuildingIndianapolisIN

20,649
1,121

21,770
21,770
3,602
18,168
1995201335 years
Methodist Professional Center IIndianapolisIN
61
37,411
5,219
61
42,630
42,691
10,467
32,224
1985201225 years
Indiana Orthopedic Center of ExcellenceIndianapolisIN
967
83,746
3,106
967
86,852
87,819
6,453
81,366
1997201535 years
United Healthcare - IndyIndianapolisIN
5,737
32,116

5,737
32,116
37,853
3,599
34,254
1988201535 years
LaPorteLa PorteIN
553
1,309

553
1,309
1,862
479
1,383
1997201134 years
MishawakaMishawakaIN
3,787
5,543

3,787
5,543
9,330
3,242
6,088
1993201135 years
Cancer Care PartnersMishawakaIN
3,162
28,633

3,162
28,633
31,795
2,909
28,886
2010201535 years
Michiana OncologyMishawakaIN
4,577
20,939
4
4,581
20,939
25,520
2,228
23,292
2010201535 years
DaVita Dialysis - PaoliPaoliIN
396
2,056

396
2,056
2,452
258
2,194
2011201535 years
South BendSouth BendIN
792
2,530

792
2,530
3,322
766
2,556
1996201134 years
Via Christi ClinicWichitaKS
1,883
7,428

1,883
7,428
9,311
922
8,389
2006201535 years
OLBH Same Day Surgery Center MOBAshlandKY
101
19,066
608
101
19,674
19,775
4,819
14,956
1997201226 years
St. Elizabeth CovingtonCovingtonKY
345
12,790
33
345
12,823
13,168
2,887
10,281
2009201235 years
St. Elizabeth Florence MOBFlorenceKY
402
8,279
1,439
402
9,718
10,120
2,640
7,480
2005201235 years
Jefferson ClinicLouisvilleKY

673
2,018

2,691
2,691
263
2,428
2013201335 years
East Jefferson Medical PlazaMetairieLA
168
17,264
2,197
168
19,461
19,629
6,008
13,621
1996201232 years
East Jefferson MOBMetairieLA
107
15,137
2,283
107
17,420
17,527
4,758
12,769
1985201228 years
Lakeside POB IMetairieLA
3,334
4,974
3,198
3,334
8,172
11,506
3,279
8,227
1986201122 years
Lakeside POB IIMetairieLA
1,046
802
547
1,046
1,349
2,395
931
1,464
198020117 years
Fresenius MedicalMetairieLA
1,195
3,797

1,195
3,797
4,992
427
4,565
2012201535 years
RTS BerlinBerlinMD

2,216


2,216
2,216
546
1,670
1994201129 years
Charles O. Fisher Medical BuildingWestminsterMD10,943

13,795
1,768

15,563
15,563
6,459
9,104
2009200935 years
Medical Specialties BuildingKalamazooMI

19,242
1,508

20,750
20,750
5,621
15,129
1989201035 years
North Professional BuildingKalamazooMI

7,228
1,633

8,861
8,861
3,001
5,860
1983201035 years
Borgess Navigation CenterKalamazooMI

2,391


2,391
2,391
694
1,697
1976201035 years
Borgess Health & Fitness CenterKalamazooMI

11,959
603

12,562
12,562
3,594
8,968
1984201035 years
Heart Center BuildingKalamazooMI

8,420
440
10
8,850
8,860
2,876
5,984
1980201035 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Medical Commons BuildingKalamazoo TownshipMI

661
644

1,305
1,305
445
860
1979201035 years
RTS Madison HeightsMadison HeightsMI
401
2,946

401
2,946
3,347
698
2,649
2002201135 years
RTS MonroeMonroeMI
281
3,450

281
3,450
3,731
917
2,814
1997201131 years
Bronson Lakeview OPCPaw PawMI
3,835
31,564

3,835
31,564
35,399
3,629
31,770
2006201535 years
Pro Med Center PlainwellPlainwellMI

697
7

704
704
223
481
1991201035 years
Pro Med Center RichlandRichlandMI
233
2,267
77
233
2,344
2,577
658
1,919
1996201035 years
Henry Ford Dialysis CenterSouthfieldMI
589
3,350

589
3,350
3,939
381
3,558
2002201535 years
Metro HealthWyomingMI
1,325
5,479

1,325
5,479
6,804
659
6,145
2008201535 years
Spectrum HealthWyomingMI
2,463
14,353

2,463
14,353
16,816
1,727
15,089
2006201535 years
Cogdell Duluth MOBDuluthMN

33,406
(19)
33,387
33,387
5,162
28,225
2012201235 years
Allina HealthElk RiverMN
1,442
7,742
54
1,442
7,796
9,238
1,058
8,180
2002201535 years
Unitron HearingPlymouthMN
2,646
8,962
5
2,646
8,967
11,613
1,511
10,102
2011201529 years
HealthPartners Medical & Dental ClinicsSartellMN
2,492
15,694
49
2,503
15,732
18,235
3,787
14,448
2010201235 years
Arnold Urgent CareArnoldMO
1,058
556
155
1,097
672
1,769
520
1,249
1999201135 years
DePaul Health Center NorthBridgetonMO
996
10,045
2,189
996
12,234
13,230
4,310
8,920
1976201221 years
DePaul Health Center SouthBridgetonMO
910
12,169
1,403
910
13,572
14,482
3,757
10,725
1992201230 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB DClaytonMO
103
2,780
925
103
3,705
3,808
1,415
2,393
1984201222 years
Fenton Urgent Care CenterFentonMO
183
2,714
364
189
3,072
3,261
1,091
2,170
2003201135 years
St. Joseph Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
305
7,445
2,286
305
9,731
10,036
2,005
8,031
1988201232 years
St. Joseph Medical MallKansas CityMO
530
9,115
608
530
9,723
10,253
2,327
7,926
1995201233 years
Carondelet Medical BuildingKansas CityMO
745
12,437
1,800
745
14,237
14,982
3,698
11,284
1979201229 years
St. Joseph Hospital West Medical Office Building IILake Saint LouisMO
524
3,229
779
524
4,008
4,532
1,046
3,486
2005201235 years
St. Joseph O'Fallon Medical Office BuildingO'FallonMO
940
5,556
114
960
5,650
6,610
1,336
5,274
1992201235 years
Sisters of Mercy BuildingSpringfieldMO
3,427
8,697

3,427
8,697
12,124
1,113
11,011
2008201535 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 1St. CharlesMO
503
4,336
1,220
503
5,556
6,059
2,010
4,049
1987201220 years
St. Joseph Health Center Medical Building 2St. CharlesMO
369
2,963
1,256
369
4,219
4,588
1,111
3,477
1999201232 years
Physicians Office CenterSt. LouisMO
1,445
13,825
858
1,445
14,683
16,128
5,147
10,981
2003201135 years
12700 Southford Road Medical PlazaSt. LouisMO
595
12,584
1,607
595
14,191
14,786
4,800
9,986
1993201132 years
St Anthony's MOB ASt. LouisMO
409
4,687
1,369
409
6,056
6,465
2,447
4,018
1975201120 years
St Anthony's MOB BSt. LouisMO
350
3,942
923
350
4,865
5,215
2,159
3,056
1980201121 years
Lemay Urgent Care CenterSt. LouisMO
2,317
3,120
635
2,351
3,721
6,072
1,820
4,252
1983201122 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB BSt. LouisMO
119
4,161
11,075
119
15,236
15,355
1,654
13,701
1979201223 years
St. Mary's Health Center MOB CSt. LouisMO
136
6,018
992
136
7,010
7,146
2,127
5,019
1969201220 years
University Physicians - Grants FerryFlowoodMS8,815
2,796
12,125
(12)2,796
12,113
14,909
2,947
11,962
2010201235 years
RandolphCharlotteNC
6,370
2,929
1,893
6,418
4,774
11,192
3,434
7,758
197320124 years
Mallard Crossing ICharlotteNC
3,229
2,072
673
3,269
2,705
5,974
1,703
4,271
1997201225 years
Medical Arts BuildingConcordNC
701
11,734
1,051
701
12,785
13,486
3,924
9,562
1997201231 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Gateway Medical Office BuildingConcordNC
1,100
9,904
629
1,100
10,533
11,633
3,220
8,413
2005201235 years
Copperfield Medical MallConcordNC
1,980
2,846
451
2,139
3,138
5,277
1,398
3,879
1989201225 years
Weddington Internal & Pediatric MedicineConcordNC
574
688
30
574
718
1,292
299
993
2000201227 years
Rex Wellness CenterGarnerNC
1,348
5,330
40
1,354
5,364
6,718
799
5,919
2003201534 years
Gaston Professional CenterGastoniaNC
833
24,885
2,384
833
27,269
28,102
5,947
22,155
1997201235 years
Harrisburg Family PhysiciansHarrisburgNC
679
1,646
48
679
1,694
2,373
448
1,925
1996201235 years
Harrisburg Medical MallHarrisburgNC
1,339
2,292
246
1,339
2,538
3,877
1,010
2,867
1997201227 years
NorthcrossHuntersvilleNC
623
278
73
623
351
974
228
746
1993201222 years
REX Knightdale MOB & Wellness CenterKnightdaleNC

22,823
486

23,309
23,309
3,690
19,619
2009201235 years
Midland Medical ParkMidlandNC
1,221
847
120
1,221
967
2,188
505
1,683
1998201225 years
East Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
803
998
(2)803
996
1,799
370
1,429
2000201233 years
Rocky Mount Kidney CenterRocky MountNC
479
1,297
39
479
1,336
1,815
511
1,304
1990201225 years
Rocky Mount Medical ParkRocky MountNC
2,552
7,779
1,919
2,652
9,598
12,250
2,797
9,453
1991201230 years
English Road Medical CenterRocky MountNC3,877
1,321
3,747
8
1,321
3,755
5,076
1,335
3,741
2002201235 years
Rowan Outpatient Surgery CenterSalisburyNC
1,039
5,184
(5)1,039
5,179
6,218
1,323
4,895
2003201235 years
Trinity Health Medical Arts ClinicMinotND
935
15,482
49
951
15,515
16,466
2,297
14,169
1995201526 years
Cooper Health MOB IWillingboroNJ
1,389
2,742
(13)1,389
2,729
4,118
414
3,704
2010201535 years
Cooper Health MOB IIWillingboroNJ
594
5,638

594
5,638
6,232
604
5,628
2012201535 years
Salem MedicalWoodstownNJ
275
4,132
3
275
4,135
4,410
440
3,970
2010201535 years
Carson Tahoe Specialty Medical CenterCarson CityNV
688
11,346
364
723
11,675
12,398
1,339
11,059
1981201535 years
Carson Tahoe MOB WestCarson CityNV
2,862
27,519
249
2,877
27,753
30,630
3,821
26,809
2007201529 years
Del E Webb Medical PlazaHendersonNV
1,028
16,993
1,515
1,028
18,508
19,536
5,153
14,383
1999201135 years
Durango Medical PlazaLas VegasNV
3,787
27,738
(3,128)3,677
24,720
28,397
2,841
25,556
2008201535 years
The Terrace at South MeadowsRenoNV6,699
504
9,966
610
504
10,576
11,080
3,183
7,897
2004201135 years
Albany Medical Center MOBAlbanyNY
321
18,389

321
18,389
18,710
1,684
17,026
2010201535 years
St. Peter's Recovery CenterGuilderlandNY
1,059
9,156

1,059
9,156
10,215
1,127
9,088
1990201535 years
Central NY Medical CenterSyracuseNY
1,786
26,101
2,980
1,792
29,075
30,867
6,923
23,944
1997201233 years
Northcountry MOBWatertownNY
1,320
10,799
7
1,320
10,806
12,126
1,346
10,780
2001201535 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building ICincinnatiOH

9,632
1,948
20
11,560
11,580
4,608
6,972
1984200735 years
Anderson Medical Arts Building IICincinnatiOH

15,123
2,282

17,405
17,405
6,972
10,433
2007200735 years
Riverside North Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
785
8,519
1,641
785
10,160
10,945
3,470
7,475
1962201225 years
Riverside South Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
586
7,298
833
610
8,107
8,717
2,567
6,150
1985201227 years
340 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
10
9,443
1,001
10
10,444
10,454
2,700
7,754
1984201229 years
393 East Town Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
61
4,760
320
61
5,080
5,141
1,614
3,527
1970201220 years
141 South Sixth Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
80
1,113
1,119
80
2,232
2,312
551
1,761
1971201214 years
Doctors West Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
414
5,362
840
414
6,202
6,616
1,655
4,961
1998201235 years
Eastside Health CenterColumbusOH
956
3,472
(2)956
3,470
4,426
1,674
2,752
1977201215 years
East Main Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
440
4,771
63
440
4,834
5,274
1,270
4,004
2006201235 years
Heart Center Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
1,063
12,140
280
1,063
12,420
13,483
3,377
10,106
2004201235 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
Wilkins Medical Office BuildingColumbusOH
123
18,062
343
123
18,405
18,528
3,968
14,560
2002201235 years
Grady Medical Office BuildingDelawareOH
239
2,263
370
239
2,633
2,872
940
1,932
1991201225 years
Dublin Northwest Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
342
3,278
234
342
3,512
3,854
1,093
2,761
2001201234 years
Preserve III Medical Office BuildingDublinOH
2,449
7,025
(66)2,449
6,959
9,408
1,883
7,525
2006201235 years
Zanesville Surgery CenterZanesvilleOH
172
9,403

172
9,403
9,575
2,126
7,449
2000201135 years
Dialysis CenterZanesvilleOH
534
855
81
534
936
1,470
541
929
1960201121 years
Genesis Children's CenterZanesvilleOH
538
3,781

538
3,781
4,319
1,184
3,135
2006201130 years
Medical Arts Building IZanesvilleOH
429
2,405
520
436
2,918
3,354
1,200
2,154
1970201120 years
Medical Arts Building IIZanesvilleOH
485
6,013
835
510
6,823
7,333
2,780
4,553
1995201125 years
Medical Arts Building IIIZanesvilleOH
94
1,248

94
1,248
1,342
505
837
1970201125 years
Primecare BuildingZanesvilleOH
130
1,344
648
130
1,992
2,122
776
1,346
1978201120 years
Outpatient Rehabilitation BuildingZanesvilleOH
82
1,541

82
1,541
1,623
521
1,102
1985201128 years
Radiation Oncology BuildingZanesvilleOH
105
1,201

105
1,201
1,306
477
829
1988201125 years
HealthplexZanesvilleOH
2,488
15,849
648
2,508
16,477
18,985
5,213
13,772
1990201132 years
Physicians PavilionZanesvilleOH
422
6,297
1,425
422
7,722
8,144
2,746
5,398
1990201125 years
Zanesville Northside PharmacyZanesvilleOH
42
635

42
635
677
223
454
1985201128 years
Bethesda Campus MOB IIIZanesvilleOH
188
1,137
141
199
1,267
1,466
482
984
1978201125 years
Tuality 7th Avenue Medical PlazaHillsboroOR18,230
1,516
24,638
1,387
1,533
26,008
27,541
6,694
20,847
2003201135 years
Professional Office Building IChesterPA

6,283
2,410

8,693
8,693
4,178
4,515
1978200430 years
DCMH Medical Office BuildingDrexel HillPA

10,424
1,599

12,023
12,023
6,223
5,800
1984200430 years
Pinnacle HealthHarrisburgPA
2,574
16,767
407
2,674
17,074
19,748
2,050
17,698
2002201535 years
Lancaster Rehabilitation HospitalLancasterPA
959
16,610
(16)959
16,594
17,553
3,815
13,738
2007201235 years
Lancaster ASC MOBLancasterPA
593
17,117
433
593
17,550
18,143
4,469
13,674
2007201235 years
St. Joseph Medical Office BuildingReadingPA

10,823
811

11,634
11,634
3,689
7,945
2006201035 years
Crozer - Keystone MOB ISpringfieldPA
9,130
47,078

9,130
47,078
56,208
6,259
49,949
1996201535 years
Crozer-Keystone MOB IISpringfieldPA
5,178
6,523

5,178
6,523
11,701
922
10,779
1998201525 years
Doylestown Health & Wellness CenterWarringtonPA
4,452
17,383
960
4,497
18,298
22,795
4,799
17,996
2001201234 years
Roper Medical Office BuildingCharlestonSC7,890
127
14,737
3,582
127
18,319
18,446
4,913
13,533
1990201228 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Charleston)CharlestonSC
447
3,946
621
447
4,567
5,014
1,369
3,645
2003201235 years
Providence MOB IColumbiaSC
225
4,274
869
225
5,143
5,368
2,105
3,263
1979201218 years
Providence MOB IIColumbiaSC
122
1,834
172
150
1,978
2,128
854
1,274
1985201218 years
Providence MOB IIIColumbiaSC
766
4,406
797
766
5,203
5,969
1,635
4,334
1990201223 years
One Medical ParkColumbiaSC
210
7,939
1,152
214
9,087
9,301
3,422
5,879
1984201219 years
Three Medical ParkColumbiaSC
40
10,650
1,411
40
12,061
12,101
3,840
8,261
1988201225 years
St. Francis Millennium Medical Office BuildingGreenvilleSC14,707

13,062
10,618
30
23,650
23,680
9,808
13,872
2009200935 years
200 AndrewsGreenvilleSC
789
2,014
362
803
2,362
3,165
1,242
1,923
1994201229 years
St. Francis CMOBGreenvilleSC
501
7,661
895
501
8,556
9,057
2,083
6,974
2001201235 years
St. Francis Outpatient Surgery CenterGreenvilleSC
1,007
16,538
889
1,007
17,427
18,434
4,449
13,985
2001201235 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
St. Francis Professional Medical CenterGreenvilleSC
342
6,337
1,336
371
7,644
8,015
2,211
5,804
1984201224 years
St. Francis Women'sGreenvilleSC
322
4,877
611
322
5,488
5,810
2,186
3,624
1991201224 years
St. Francis Medical Plaza (Greenville)GreenvilleSC
88
5,876
1,028
98
6,894
6,992
1,995
4,997
1998201224 years
Irmo Professional MOBIrmoSC
1,726
5,414
258
1,726
5,672
7,398
1,945
5,453
2004201135 years
River Hills Medical PlazaLittle RiverSC
1,406
1,813
187
1,406
2,000
3,406
736
2,670
1999201227 years
Mount Pleasant Medical Office LongpointMount PleasantSC
670
4,455
186
632
4,679
5,311
1,952
3,359
2001201234 years
Mary Black Westside Medical Office BldgSpartanburgSC
291
5,057
516
300
5,564
5,864
1,618
4,246
1991201231 years
Spartanburg ASCSpartanburgSC
1,333
15,756

1,333
15,756
17,089
1,521
15,568
2002201535 years
Spartanburg Regional MOBSpartanburgSC
207
17,963
550
286
18,434
18,720
1,995
16,725
1986201535 years
Wellmont Blue Ridge MOBBristolTN
999
5,027
32
999
5,059
6,058
628
5,430
2001201535 years
Health Park Medical Office BuildingChattanoogaTN5,955
2,305
8,949
51
2,305
9,000
11,305
2,317
8,988
2004201235 years
Peerless Crossing Medical CenterClevelandTN
1,217
6,464
13
1,217
6,477
7,694
1,577
6,117
2006201235 years
St. Mary's Clinton Professional Office BuildingClintonTN
298
618
6
298
624
922
145
777
1988201539 years
St. Mary's Farragut MOBFarragutTN
221
2,719
137
221
2,856
3,077
351
2,726
1997201539 years
Medical Center Physicians TowerJacksonTN13,344
549
27,074
50
598
27,075
27,673
6,744
20,929
2010201235 years
St. Mary's Physician Professional Office BuildingKnoxvilleTN
138
3,144
129
138
3,273
3,411
509
2,902
1981201539 years
St. Mary's Magdalene Clarke TowerKnoxvilleTN
69
4,153
11
69
4,164
4,233
583
3,650
1972201539 years
St. Mary's Medical Office BuildingKnoxvilleTN
136
359
31
136
390
526
124
402
1976201539 years
St. Mary's Ambulatory Surgery CenterKnoxvilleTN
129
1,012

129
1,012
1,141
221
920
1999201524 years
Texas Clinic at ArlingtonArlingtonTX
2,781
24,515
91
2,781
24,606
27,387
2,680
24,707
2010201535 years
Seton Medical Park TowerAustinTX
805
41,527
2,803
1,329
43,806
45,135
8,799
36,336
1968201235 years
Seton Northwest Health PlazaAustinTX
444
22,632
2,809
444
25,441
25,885
5,188
20,697
1988201235 years
Seton Southwest Health PlazaAustinTX
294
5,311
241
294
5,552
5,846
1,133
4,713
2004201235 years
Seton Southwest Health Plaza IIAustinTX
447
10,154
84
447
10,238
10,685
2,124
8,561
2009201235 years
BioLife Sciences BuildingDentonTX
1,036
6,576

1,036
6,576
7,612
817
6,795
2010201535 years
East Houston MOB, LLCHoustonTX
356
2,877
702
328
3,607
3,935
2,084
1,851
1982201115 years
East Houston Medical PlazaHoustonTX
671
426
535
671
961
1,632
847
785
1982201111 years
Memorial HermannHoustonTX
822
14,307

822
14,307
15,129
1,451
13,678
2012201535 years
Scott & White HealthcareKingslandTX
534
5,104

534
5,104
5,638
593
5,045
2012201535 years
Odessa Regional MOBOdessaTX
121
8,935

121
8,935
9,056
942
8,114
2008201535 years
Legacy Heart CenterPlanoTX
3,081
8,890
8
3,081
8,898
11,979
1,148
10,831
2005201535 years
Seton Williamson Medical PlazaRound RockTX

15,074
586

15,660
15,660
4,849
10,811
2008201035 years
Sunnyvale Medical PlazaSunnyvaleTX
1,186
15,397
397
1,215
15,765
16,980
1,834
15,146
2009201535 years
Texarkana ASCTexarkanaTX
814
5,903

814
5,903
6,717
785
5,932
1994201530 years
Spring Creek Medical PlazaTomballTX
2,165
8,212
16
2,165
8,228
10,393
888
9,505
2006201535 years
251 Medical CenterWebsterTX
1,158
12,078
(3,777)1,163
8,296
9,459
2,616
6,843
2006201135 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
253 Medical CenterWebsterTX
1,181
11,862
(3,820)1,181
8,042
9,223
2,460
6,763
2009201135 years
MRMC MOB IMechanicsvilleVA
1,669
7,024
433
1,669
7,457
9,126
2,694
6,432
1993201231 years
Henrico MOBRichmondVA
968
6,189
1,209
968
7,398
8,366
2,677
5,689
1976201125 years
St. Mary's MOB North (Floors 6 & 7)RichmondVA
227
2,961
633
227
3,594
3,821
1,257
2,564
1968201222 years
Virginia Urology CenterRichmondVA
3,822
16,127

3,822
16,127
19,949
1,899
18,050
2004201535 years
St. Francis Cancer CenterRichmondVA
654
18,331
23
657
18,351
19,008
1,956
17,052
2006201535 years
Bonney Lake Medical Office BuildingBonney LakeWA10,203
5,176
14,375
165
5,176
14,540
19,716
3,820
15,896
2011201235 years
Good Samaritan Medical Office BuildingPuyallupWA13,220
781
30,368
692
801
31,040
31,841
6,620
25,221
2011201235 years
Holy Family Hospital Central MOBSpokaneWA

19,085
260

19,345
19,345
3,181
16,164
2007201235 years
Physician's PavilionVancouverWA
1,411
32,939
957
1,431
33,876
35,307
8,662
26,645
2001201135 years
Administration BuildingVancouverWA
296
7,856

296
7,856
8,152
2,013
6,139
1972201135 years
Medical Center Physician's BuildingVancouverWA
1,225
31,246
2,791
1,251
34,011
35,262
8,191
27,071
1980201135 years
Memorial MOBVancouverWA
663
12,626
750
690
13,349
14,039
3,307
10,732
1999201135 years
Salmon Creek MOBVancouverWA
1,325
9,238

1,325
9,238
10,563
2,340
8,223
1994201135 years
Fisher's Landing MOBVancouverWA
1,590
5,420

1,590
5,420
7,010
1,654
5,356
1995201134 years
Columbia Medical Plaza VancouverVancouverWA
281
5,266
323
331
5,539
5,870
1,465
4,405
1991201135 years
Appleton Heart InstituteAppletonWI

7,775
31

7,806
7,806
2,126
5,680
2003201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices WestAppletonWI

5,756
85

5,841
5,841
1,602
4,239
1989201039 years
Appleton Medical Offices SouthAppletonWI

9,058
185

9,243
9,243
2,671
6,572
1983201039 years
Brookfield ClinicBrookfieldWI
2,638
4,093

2,638
4,093
6,731
1,295
5,436
1999201135 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - FranklinFranklinWI
1,973
7,579
65
2,029
7,588
9,617
940
8,677
2008201534 years
Lakeshore Medical Clinic - GreenfieldGreenfieldWI
1,223
13,387
10
1,223
13,397
14,620
1,373
13,247
2010201535 years
Aurora Health Care - HartfordHartfordWI
3,706
22,019

3,706
22,019
25,725
2,546
23,179
2006201535 years
Hartland ClinicHartlandWI
321
5,050

321
5,050
5,371
1,361
4,010
1994201135 years
Aurora Healthcare - KenoshaKenoshaWI
7,546
19,155

7,546
19,155
26,701
2,263
24,438
2014201535 years
Univ of Wisconsin HealthMononaWI
678
8,017

678
8,017
8,695
1,011
7,684
2011201535 years
Theda Clark Medical Center Office PavilionNeenahWI

7,080
747

7,827
7,827
2,008
5,819
1993201039 years
Aylward Medical Building Condo Floors 3 & 4NeenahWI

4,462
95

4,557
4,557
1,330
3,227
2006201039 years
Aurora Health Care - NeenahNeenahWI
2,033
9,072

2,033
9,072
11,105
1,126
9,979
2006201535 years
New Berlin ClinicNew BerlinWI
678
7,121

678
7,121
7,799
2,062
5,737
1999201135 years
United Healthcare - OnalaskaOnalaskaWI
4,623
5,527

4,623
5,527
10,150
891
9,259
1995201535 years
WestWood Health & FitnessPewaukeeWI
823
11,649

823
11,649
12,472
3,403
9,069
1997201135 years
Aurora Health Care - Two RiversTwo RiversWI
5,638
25,308

5,638
25,308
30,946
2,950
27,996
2006201535 years
Watertown ClinicWatertownWI
166
3,234

166
3,234
3,400
841
2,559
2003201135 years
Southside ClinicWaukeshaWI
218
5,273

218
5,273
5,491
1,389
4,102
1997201135 years
Rehabilitation HospitalWaukeshaWI
372
15,636

372
15,636
16,008
3,608
12,400
2008201135 years
United Healthcare - WauwatosaWawatosaWI
8,012
15,992

8,012
15,992
24,004
2,284
21,720
1995201535 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
BSG CS, LLCWaunakeeWI
1,060

(134)926

926

926
N/A2012N/A
TOTAL FOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS  350,898
389,589
4,108,450
249,979
392,718
4,355,300
4,748,018
950,558
3,797,460
   
LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS              
100 College StreetNew HavenCT
2,706
186,570
5,985
2,706
192,555
195,261
5,311
189,950
2013201659 years
300 George StreetNew HavenCT
2,262
122,144
3,972
2,262
126,116
128,378
3,805
124,573
2014201650 years
Univ. of Miami Life Science and Technology ParkMiamiFL
2,249
87,019
4,603
2,249
91,622
93,871
3,204
90,667
2014201653 years
IITChicagoIL
30
55,620
67
30
55,687
55,717
1,784
53,933
2006201646 years
University of Maryland BioPark I Unit 1BaltimoreMD
113
25,199
789
113
25,988
26,101
813
25,288
2005201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIBaltimoreMD
61
91,764
3,243
61
95,007
95,068
3,446
91,622
2007201650 years
University of Maryland BioPark GarageBaltimoreMD
77
4,677
345
77
5,022
5,099
267
4,832
2007201629 years
Tributary StreetBaltimoreMD
4,015
15,905
597
4,015
16,502
20,517
770
19,747
1998201645 years
Beckley StreetBaltimoreMD
2,813
13,481
574
2,813
14,055
16,868
675
16,193
1999201645 years
University of Maryland BioPark IIIBaltimoreMD
980
34

980
34
1,014

1,014
CIPCIPCIP
Heritage at 4240Saint LouisMO
403
47,125
325
452
47,401
47,853
2,104
45,749
2013201645 years
Cortex 1Saint LouisMO
631
26,543
1,094
631
27,637
28,268
1,301
26,967
2005201650 years
BRDG ParkSaint LouisMO
606
37,083
1,580
606
38,663
39,269
1,208
38,061
2009201652 years
4220 Duncan AvenueSt LouisMO


14,921
1,871
13,050
14,921

14,921
N/A2016N/A
311 South Sarah StreetSt. LouisMO
7,567
(1,775)
7,567
(1,775)5,792
6
5,786
CIPCIPCIP
4300 DuncanSt. LouisMO
2,818
46,749

2,818
46,749
49,567
130
49,437
2008201735 years
Weston ParkwayCaryNC
1,372
6,535
1,018
1,372
7,553
8,925
285
8,640
1990201650 years
Patriot DriveDurhamNC
1,960
10,749
373
1,960
11,122
13,082
465
12,617
2010201650 years
ChesterfieldDurhamNC
3,266
58,020

3,266
58,020
61,286
841
60,445
2017201760 years
Paramount ParkwayMorrisvilleNC
1,016
19,794
617
1,016
20,411
21,427
869
20,558
1999201645 years
Wake 90Winston-SalemNC
2,752
79,949
105
2,752
80,054
82,806
3,196
79,610
2013201640 years
Wake 91Winston-SalemNC
1,729
73,690

1,729
73,690
75,419
2,395
73,024
2011201650 years
Wake 60Winston-SalemNC15,000
1,243
83,414
1,868
1,243
85,282
86,525
3,320
83,205
2016201635 years
Bailey Power PlantWinston-SalemNC
1,930
33,395

1,930
33,395
35,325

35,325
2017201735 years
Hershey Center Unit 1HummelstownPA
813
23,699
786
813
24,485
25,298
918
24,380
2007201650 years
3737 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
40
141,981
5,711
40
147,692
147,732
3,950
143,782
2014201654 years
3711 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
12,320
69,278
2,597
12,320
71,875
84,195
2,342
81,853
2008201648 years
3750 Lancaster AvenuePhiladelphiaPA

205


205
205

205
CIPCIPCIP
3675 Market StreetPhiladelphiaPA
11,370
53,539

11,370
53,539
64,909

64,909
CIPCIPCIP
3701 Filbert StreetPhiladelphiaPA

1,080


1,080
1,080

1,080
CIPCIPCIP
115 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA

289


289
289

289
CIPCIPCIP
225 North 38th StreetPhiladelphiaPA

2,460


2,460
2,460

2,460
CIPCIPCIP
South Street LandingProvidenceRI
6,358
112,036

6,358
112,036
118,394
997
117,397
2017201745 years

 Location Initial Cost to Company Gross Amount Carried at Close of Period      
Property NameCity
State /
Province
Encumbrances
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Costs
Capitalized
Subsequent
to Acquisition
Land and
Improvements
Buildings and
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
NBV
Year of
Construction
Year
Acquired
Life on
Which
Depreciation
in Income
Statement
is Computed
2/3 Davol SquareProvidenceRI
4,537
6,886

4,537
6,886
11,423
660
10,763
2005201715 years
One Ship StreetProvidenceRI
1,943
1,734

1,943
1,734
3,677
58
3,619
1980201725 years
Brown Academic/R&D BuildingProvidenceRI


9,834

9,834
9,834

9,834
2007201655 years
IRP INorfolkVA
60
20,084
607
60
20,691
20,751
720
20,031
2007201655 years
IRP IINorfolkVA
69
21,255
748
69
22,003
22,072
715
21,357
2007201655 years
Wexford Biotech 8RichmondVA
2,615
85,496

2,615
85,496
88,111
474
87,637
2012201735 years
TOTAL FOR LIFE SCIENCE AND INNOVATION CENTERS  14,999
82,724
1,663,706
62,359
84,644
1,724,145
1,808,789
47,029
1,761,760
   
TOTAL OFFICE BUILDINGS  365,897
472,313
5,772,156
312,338
477,362
6,079,445
6,556,807
997,587
5,559,220
   
TOTAL FOR ALL PROPERTIES  $1,308,564
$2,140,863
$21,575,402
$951,573
$2,147,621
$22,520,217
$24,667,838
$4,785,395
$19,882,443
   



VENTAS, INC.
SCHEDULE IV
MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 20172019

LocationNumber of RE AssetsInterest RateFixed / VariableMaturity DateMonthly Debt ServiceFace ValueNet Book ValuePrior LiensLocationNumber of RE AssetsInterest RateFixed / VariableMaturity DateMonthly Debt ServiceFace ValueNet Book ValuePrior Liens
 (In thousands) (In thousands)
First MortgagesFirst Mortgages  First Mortgages  
Multiple39.77%V6/30/2019$137
$17,023
$17,023
$
Ohio18.88%V10/1/2021568
78,448
78,448

Ohio58.13%V10/1/2021535
78,448
78,448

Texas17.21%V1/31/202912
1,900
1,900

    
Mezzanine LoansMezzanine Loans  Mezzanine Loans  
Multiple319.95%F/V2/6/20211,091
121,699
121,699
1,420,844
Multiple1568.16%V6/9/20212,005
489,752
487,246
1,024,482
Multiple*1798.27%F/V12/9/20192,138
290,099
290,099
1,560,415
California17.76%V8/29/202414
6,428
6,428
34,252
  California17.76%V8/29/202420
9,336
9,336
11,181
  
Construction LoansConstruction Loans  Construction Loans  
Colorado18.75%V2/6/2021437
59,045
58,606

Colorado18.75%F11/1/2021437
59,043
58,860

TotalTotal $4,338
$566,314
$565,875
$2,981,259
Total $3,056
$644,907
$642,218
$1,069,915
    
* The variable portion of this investment has a maturity date of 12/9/2018, with extension options to 12/9/2019.
 Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
 
   2017 2016 2015
   (In thousands)
 Beginning Balance $634,969
 $784,821
 $747,456
 Additions:      
 New Loans 
 140,000
 88,648
 Construction Draws 
 13,403
 53,708
 Total additions 
 153,403
 142,356
 Deductions:      
 Principal Repayments (68,655) (303,255) (99,467)
 Spin Off 
 
 (5,524)
 Total deductions (68,655) (303,255) (104,991)
 Ending Balance $566,314
 $634,969
 $784,821
 Mortgage Loan Reconciliation
 
   2019 2018 2017
   (In thousands)
 Beginning Balance $427,117
 $565,875
 $634,201
 Additions:      
 New loans 1,234,244
 9,900
 
 Construction draws 
 
 
 Total additions 1,234,244
 9,900
 
 Deductions:      
 Principal repayments (1,011,353) (148,658) (68,326)
 Total deductions (1,011,353) (148,658) (68,326)
 Effect of foreign currency translation (7,790) 
 
 Ending Balance $642,218
 $427,117
 $565,875



ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017.2019. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of December 31, 2017,2019, at the reasonable assurance level.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The information set forth under “Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 9A.
Internal Control Changes
During the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 9B.    Other Information


Not applicable.


PART III


ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


The information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 1: Election of Directors,” “Our Executive Officers,” “Securities Ownership—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance—Governance Policies” and “Audit and Compliance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2020.


ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2020.


ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Securities Ownership” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2020.



ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
    
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the material under the headings “Corporate Governance—Transactions with Related Persons,” “Our Board of Directors—Director Independence,” “Audit and Compliance Committee,” “Executive Compensation Committee” and “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2020.




ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services


The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Proposals Requiring Your Vote—Proposal 2: Ratification of the Selection of KPMG LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2018”2020” in our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the SEC not later than April 30, 2018.2020.




PART IV
ITEM 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents have been included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K which are filed with this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 9, 2018
VENTAS, INC.
By:/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFAROChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)February 9, 2018
Debra A. Cafaro
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBSTExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)February 9, 2018
Robert F. Probst
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBESenior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)February 9, 2018
Gregory R. Liebbe
/s/ MELODY C. BARNESDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Melody C. Barnes
/s/ JAY M. GELLERTDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Jay M. Gellert
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRISTDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Richard I. Gilchrist
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIGDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Matthew J. Lustig
/s/ ROXANNE M. MARTINODirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Roxanne M. Martino
/s/WALTER C. RAKOWICHDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Walter C. Rakowich
/s/ ROBERT D. REEDDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Robert D. Reed
/s/ GLENN J. RUFRANODirectorFebruary 9, 2018
Glenn J. Rufrano
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTONDirectorFebruary 9, 2018
James D. Shelton



EXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
 Description of Document Location of Document
Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Ventas, Inc. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on August 5, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended, of Ventas, Inc. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 11, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Specimen common stock certificate. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 12, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Indenture dated as of September 19, 2006 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuer(s), the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.9 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on April 7, 2006, File No. 333-133115.
     
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 17, 2011 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.750% Senior Notes due 2021.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 20, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 10, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.250% Senior Notes due 2022.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2019.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 18, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
 Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 3, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, filed on October 26, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
     
Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2012 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.000% Senior Notes due 2018.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 13, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed on March 7, 2013, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 19, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and Ventas Capital Corporation, as Issuers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 2.700% Senior Notes due 2020.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
 Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.10 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 26, 2013 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.700% Senior Notes due 2043. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 26, 2013, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2014 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.750% Senior Notes due 2024. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 17, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2025. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 14, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2045. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 14, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Indenture dated as of August 19, 1997 by and between Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 1.2 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 19, 1997, File No. 001-09028 (see Exhibit 1.2 of complete submission text file).
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 2011 among Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., Needles Acquisition LLC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor Trustee, relating to the 6.90% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2037 and the 6.59% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2038. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.17 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed on February 14, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Indenture dated as September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Canadian Finance Limited, the Guarantors parties thereto from time to time and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.00% Senior Notes, Series A due 2019.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 24, 2014 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes, Series B due 2024. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, filed on October 24, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 13, 2015 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 3.30% Senior Notes, Series C due 2022. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.24 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2017 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 2.55% Senior Notes, Series D due 2023. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, filed on July 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2019 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the 2.80% Senior Notes, Series E due 2024.Filed herewith.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2019 by and among Ventas Canada Finance Limited, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and Computershare Trust Company of Canada, as Trustee, relating to the Floating Rate Senior Notes, Series F due 2021.Filed herewith.
 Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     
 First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 16, 2015 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2026. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 2, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.125% Senior Notes due 2023. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 2, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 21, 2016 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.250% Senior Notes due 2026. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 21, 2016, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 29, 2017 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 3.100% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 3.850% Senior Notes due 2027. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 29, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
Indenture dated February 23, 2018 among Ventas, Inc., Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, the Guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 23, 2018 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 4.000% Senior Notes due 2028

Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 23, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 15, 2018 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 4.400% Senior Notes due 2029

Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 15, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 26, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 3.500% Senior Notes due 2024 and 4.875% Senior Notes due 2049Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 3, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 2.650% Senior Notes due 2025Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 3, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 21, 2019 by and among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Issuer, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee relating to the 3.000% Senior Notes due 2030Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2019, File No. 001-10989.
Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated July 26, 2018 among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, as Borrower, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, The Lenders party thereto from time to time, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent

Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, filed on October 26, 2018, File No. 001.10989.

 First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, filed on May 29, 2002, File No. 333-89312.

     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2017, among Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership, Ventas SSL Ontario II, Inc., Ventas SSL Ontario III, Inc., Ventas Canada Finance Limited, Ventas UK Finance, Inc., and Ventas Euro Finance, LLC, as Borrowers, Ventas, Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Alternative Currency Fronting Lender, Bank of America, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Swing Line Lenders and L/C Issuers. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
Tax Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Matters Agreement dated as of August 17, 2015 by and between Ventas, Inc. and Care Capital Properties, Inc.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 21, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
 Ventas, Inc. 2004 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.16.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 1, 2005, File No. 33-107942.
     
 Ventas, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement—2006 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on February 22, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Ventas, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Amendment to Stock Option Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed on April 27, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement—2006 Stock Plan for Directors. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.11.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 23, 2012, File No. 001-10989.
     
 First Amendment to the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Stock Option Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Employees) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed on February 13, 2015, File No. 001-10989.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Form of Stock Option Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Directors) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Form on S-8, filed on August 7, 2012, File No. 333-183121.
     
 Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Form of Transition Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Non-CEO) under the Ventas, Inc. 2012 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on April 28, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017. Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Executive Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 7, 2017. Filed herewith.
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
.


     
 Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Deferral Election Form under the Ventas Nonemployee Directors’ Deferred Stock Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.13.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Appendix B to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting, filed on March 24, 2005, File No. 001-09028.
First Amendment to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, dated October 28, 2008.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.

Exhibit
Number
 Description of Document Location of Document
 Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed on May 4, 2006, File No. 001-09028.
     
 Amendment dated October 28, 2008 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan for Directors, as amended and restated on April 20, 2006. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 3, 2008, File No. 001-09028.
     
 Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and Debra A. Cafaro. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
     
 EmploymentConsulting Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998October 15, 2019 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.Filed herewith.
     
 Consulting Agreement Amendment dated as of September 30, 1999 to Employment AgreementDecember 13, 2019 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.2.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on February 26, 2003, File No. 001-10989.Filed herewith.
     
Amendment dated as of March 19, 2007 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 23, 2007, File No. 001-10989.
Amendment dated as of December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.15.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Severance Agreement dated as of March 22, 2011 between Ventas, Inc. and T. Richard Riney.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 24, 2011, File No. 001-10989.
Employment Agreement dated as of June 22, 2010 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on July 30, 2010, File No. 001-10989.
Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated June 17, 2015 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2015, File No., 001-10989.
Employment Transition Agreement dated as of July 25, 2017 between Ventas, Inc. and Todd W. Lillibridge.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, filed on October 27, 2017, File No. 001-10989.
 Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 18, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of October 21, 2013 between Ventas, Inc. and John D. Cobb. Filed herewith.Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.16.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Offer Letter dated September 16, 2014 from Ventas, Inc. to Robert F. Probst. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     
 Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 29, 2014, File No. 001-10989.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Amendment dated December 8, 2017 to Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of September 16, 2014 between Ventas, Inc. and Robert F. Probst. Filed herewith.
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.17.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 9, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

     
Offer of Employment Term Sheet dated March 20, 2018 from Ventas, Inc. to Peter J. Bulgarelli.
Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on April 27, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

Employee Protection and Noncompetition Agreement dated March 20, 2018 between Ventas, Inc. and Peter J. Bulgarelli.

Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on April 27, 2018, File No. 001-10989.

 Ventas Employee and Director Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference herein. Previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 27, 2009, File No. 001-10989.
     
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.Filed herewith.
 Subsidiaries of Ventas, Inc. Filed herewith.
     
 Consent of KPMG LLP. Filed herewith.
     
 Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
     

Exhibit
Number
Description of DocumentLocation of Document
 Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
     
 Certification of Debra A. Cafaro, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350. Filed herewith.
     
 Certification of Robert F. Probst, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. 1350. Filed herewith.
     
101 Interactive Data File. Filed herewith.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.




ITEM 16.    Form 10-K Summary
None.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 21, 2020
VENTAS, INC.
By:/s/ DEBRA A. CAFARO
Debra A. Cafaro
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


191
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ DEBRA A. CAFAROChairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)February 21, 2020
Debra A. Cafaro
/s/ ROBERT F. PROBSTExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)February 21, 2020
Robert F. Probst
/s/ GREGORY R. LIEBBESenior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)February 21, 2020
Gregory R. Liebbe
/s/ MELODY C. BARNESDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Melody C. Barnes
/s/ JAY M. GELLERTDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Jay M. Gellert
/s/ RICHARD I. GILCHRISTDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Richard I. Gilchrist
/s/ MATTHEW J. LUSTIGDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Matthew J. Lustig
/s/ ROXANNE M. MARTINODirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Roxanne M. Martino
/s/ SEAN P. NOLANDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Sean P. Nolan
/s/WALTER C. RAKOWICHDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Walter C. Rakowich
/s/ ROBERT D. REEDDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
Robert D. Reed
/s/ JAMES D. SHELTONDirectorFebruary 21, 2020
James D. Shelton



170