UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

2021

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from  to 

Commission file number 0-12820

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

54-1284688

Virginia54-1284688

(State of incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

628 Main Street, Danville, VA

24541

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

434-792-5111

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $1 par value

AMNB

Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

☐ Yes   þ  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

☐ Yes   þ  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ

Yes  ☐ No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

þ

Yes  ☐ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐                        Accelerated filer  þ

☑ 

Non-accelerated filer  ☐(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                         Smaller reporting company ☐

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (12 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)

☐ Yes   þ  No

1

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2017,2021, based on the closing price, was $294,857,157.

$321,204,000.

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on March 2, 20184, 2022 was 8,675,516.

10,738,548.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement of the Registrant for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2018,17, 2022, are incorporated by reference ininto Part III of this report.


2

CROSS REFERENCE INDEX

PART I

PAGE

ITEM 1

ITEM 1A

ITEM 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

None

23

ITEM 2

ITEM 3

ITEM 4

PART II

ITEM 5

ITEM 6

ITEM 7

ITEM 7A

ITEM 8

ITEM 9

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

99

ITEM 9A

ITEM 9B

Other Information

99

ITEM 9B9COther InformationDisclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent InspectionsNone99

PART III

ITEM 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

*

ITEM 11

Executive Compensation

*

ITEM 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

*

ITEM 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

*

ITEM 14

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

*

PART IV

ITEM 15

ITEM 16

Form 10-K Summary

None

101

*Certain information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Election of Directors," "Election of Directors – Board Members Serving on Other Publicly Traded Company Boards of Directors," "Election of Directors – Board of Directors and Committees," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," "Report of the Audit Committee," and "Code of Conduct" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K on executive officers is disclosed herein.

under Item 1- Business.

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Compensation Committee Report" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the heading "Security Ownership" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is disclosed herein.  See Item 5, "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities."

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the headings "Related Party Transactions" and "Election of Directors – Board Independence" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information that appears under the heading "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 20182022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

3


PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of American National Bankshares Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary, American National Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management of the Company and on information available to management at the time these statements and disclosures were prepared. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, estimates, risks, and uncertainties that could cause actual conditions, events, or results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements.

A variety of factors, some of which are discussed in more detail in Item 1A – Risk Factors, may affect the operations, performance, business strategy, and results of the Company. Those factors include but are not limited to the following:

financial market volatility including the level of interest rates could affect the values of financial instruments and the amount of net interest income earned;
general economic or business conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does business, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in deteriorating credit quality, reduced demand for credit, or a weakened ability to generate deposits;
competition among financial institutions may increase and competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products and technology that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than the Company;
businesses that the Company is engaged in may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards and tax laws;
the ability to retain key personnel;
the failure of assumptions underlying the allowance for loan losses; and
risks associated with mergers, acquisitions, and other expansion activities.

the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the associated efforts to limit the spread of the virus;

financial market volatility including the level of interest rates, could affect the values of financial instruments and the amount of net interest income earned;

the adequacy of the level of the Company's allowance for loan losses, the amount of loan loss provisions required in future periods, and the failure of assumptions underlying the allowance for loan losses;

general economic or business conditions, either nationally or in the market areas in which the Company does business, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in deteriorating credit quality, reduced demand for credit, or a weakened ability to generate deposits;

competition among financial institutions may increase, and competitors may have greater financial resources and develop products and technology that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than the Company;

businesses that the Company is engaged in may be adversely affected by legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards and tax laws;

the ability to recruit and retain key personnel;

cybersecurity threats or attacks, the implementation of new technologies, and the ability to develop and maintain reliable and secure electronic systems; and
geopolitical conditions, including acts or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts, or actions taken by the U.S. or other governments in response to acts of threats or terrorism and/or military conflicts, negatively impacting business and economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad; and

risks associated with mergers, acquisitions, and other expansion activities.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

American National Bankshares Inc. is a one-bank holding company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1984. On September 1, 1984, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of American National Bank and Trust Company, a national banking association chartered in 1909 under the laws of the United States. American National Bank and Trust Company is the only banking subsidiary of the Company.

On January 1, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. ("MainStreet") pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 24, 2014, between the Company and MainStreet.  Immediately after the merger of MainStreet into the Company, Franklin Community Bank, N.A. ("Franklin Bank"), MainStreet's wholly-owned bank subsidiary, merged with and into the Bank. Franklin Bank provided banking services to its customers from three banking offices located in Rocky Mount, Hardy, and Union Hall, Virginia.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the operations of the Company arewere conducted at twenty-six26 banking offices in south central Virginia and twonorth central North Carolina and one loan production officesoffice in Roanoke, Virginia and Raleigh, North Carolina.Virginia. Through these offices, the Company serves its primary market area of south central Virginia and north central North Carolina. The Bank provides a full array of financial products and services, including commercial, mortgage, and consumer banking; trust and investment services; and insurance. Services are also provided through thirty-four37 Automated Teller Machines ("ATMs"), "Online Banking," and "Telephone Banking."

On April 1, 2019, the Company completed the acquisition of Roanoke-based HomeTown Bankshares Corporation ("HomeTown"). The acquisition of HomeTown deepened the Company's footprint in the Roanoke, Virginia metropolitan area and created a presence in the New River Valley with an office in Christiansburg, Virginia.

The Company has two reportable segments, (i) community banking and (ii) trust and investment services.wealth management. For more financial data and other information about each of the Company’sCompany's operating segments, refer to "Note 2021 - Segment and Related Information" of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Competition and Markets

Vigorous competition exists in the Company's service areas. The Company competes not only with national, regional, and community banks, but also with other types of financial institutions including savings banks, finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, financial technology companies, brokerage firms, wealth management firms, insurance companies, credit unions, and mortgage companies.

The Company’sCompany's primary market area is south central Virginia and north central North Carolina. The Company also has a significant presence in Roanoke, Virginia.Virginia that increased substantially in connection with the acquisition of HomeTown. The Company's Virginia banking offices are located in the cities of Danville, Lynchburg, Martinsville, Roanoke, and MartinsvilleSalem and in the counties of Bedford, Campbell, Franklin, Halifax, Henry, Montgomery, Pittsylvania and Roanoke. In North Carolina, the Company's banking offices are located in the cities of Burlington, Graham, Greensboro, Mebane, andRaleigh, Winston-Salem, and inYanceyville, which are within the counties of Alamance, Caswell, Forsyth, Guilford, and Guilford. Wake. 

4

The Company has the largest deposit market share in the City of Danville, Virginia. The Company had a deposit market share in the Danville Micropolitan Statistical Area of 35.3%38.32% at June 30, 2017,2021 based on Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") data. The Company has the second largest deposit market share in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The Company had a deposit market share in Pittsylvaniathe County of 23.4%26.23% at June 30, 2017,2021, based on FDIC data.

The

Unemployment levels in each Virginia market area, in which the Company has a significant presence, continuesserves have continued to show improvement. The region's economic base continuesimprove from their COVID-19 related highs in early to be weighted towardmid-2020. Service sectors, financials, medical, manufacturing, construction, timber management and production, and technology related businesses have remained strong while hospitality, restaurants, travel & tourism, meeting spaces, and fitness facilities continue to suffer from the manufacturing sector.  Although the region was negatively impacted by the elimination of many textile plant closings over several decades, the area has experienced some new manufacturing plant openings as well as job growth in the technology area.COVID-19 restrictions. Other important business industries include farming, tobacco processing and sales, and food processing, and packaging tape production.

processing. New businesses continue to move into the Company's Virginia footprint, which has been positive for economic growth.

The Company's market area in North Carolina has strong competition in attracting deposits and making loans. Its most direct competition for deposits comes from commercial banks savings institutions and credit unions located in the market area, including large financial institutions that have greater financial and marketing resources available to them. The Company had a deposit market share in Alamance County of 15.0%14.35% at June 30, 2017,2021, based on FDIC data, which was the secondthird largest of any FDIC-insured institution.

In the fall of 2016, the Company announced the opening of a de novo branch in each of Roanoke, Virginia and Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Supervision and Regulation

The Company and the Bank are extensively regulated under federal and state law. The following information describesdescription briefly addresses certain aspectsprovisions of that regulation applicable tofederal and state laws and regulations, and their potential effects on the Company and the Bank and does not purport to be complete.Bank. Proposals to change the laws, regulations, and policies governing the banking industry are frequently raised in U.S. Congress, in state legislatures, and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any changes and the impact such changes might have on the Company and the Bank are impossible to determine with any certainty. A change in applicable laws, regulations or policies, or a change in the way such laws, regulations or policies are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material impact on the business, operations, and earnings of the Company and the Bank.

American National Bankshares Inc.

American National Bankshares Inc. is qualified as a bank holding company ("BHC") within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHC Act"), and is registered as such with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB"). As a bank holding company, American National Bankshares Inc.the Company is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the FRB and is required to file various reports and additional information with the FRB. American National Bankshares Inc.The Company is also registered under the bank holding company laws of Virginia and is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the "SCC").

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a BHC may elect to become a financial holding company and thereby engage in a broader range of financial and other activities than are permissible for traditional BHC's.  In order to qualify for the election, all of the depository institution subsidiaries of the BHC must be well capitalized, well managed, and have achieved a rating of "satisfactory" or better under the Community Reinvestment Act (the "CRA").  Financial holding companies are permitted to engage in activities that are "financial in nature" or incidental or complementary thereto as determined by the FRB.  The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act identifies several activities as "financial in nature," including insurance underwriting and sales, investment advisory services, merchant banking and underwriting, and dealing or making a market in securities.  American National Bankshares Inc. has not elected to become a financial holding company, and has no plans to become a financial holding company.

American National Bank and Trust Company

American National Bank and Trust Company is a federally chartered national bank and is a member of the Federal Reserve System. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC") and is required to file various reports and additional information with the OCC. The OCC has primary supervisory and regulatory authority over the operations of the Bank. Because the Bank accepts insured deposits from the public, it is also subject to examination by the FDIC.

Depository institutions, including the Bank, are subject to extensive federal and state regulations that significantly affect their business and activities. Regulatory bodies have broad authority to implement standards and initiate proceedings designed to prohibit depository institutions from engaging in unsafe and unsound banking practices. The standards relate generally to


operations and management, asset quality, interest rate exposure, and capital. The bank regulatory agencies are authorized to take action against institutions that fail to meet such standards.

As with other financial institutions, the earnings of the Bank are affected by general economic conditions and by the monetary policies of the FRB. The FRB exerts a substantial influence on interest rates and credit conditions, primarily through open market operations in U.S. Government securities, setting the reserve requirements of member banks, and establishing the discount rate on member bank borrowings. The policies of the FRB have a direct impact on loan and deposit growth and the interest rates charged and paid thereon. They also impact the source, cost of funds, and the rates of return on investments. Changes in the FRB's monetary policies have had a significant impact on the operating results of the Bank and other financial institutions and are expected to continue to do so in the future; however, the exact impact of such conditions and policies upon the future business and earnings cannot accurately be predicted.

The Dodd-Frank Act
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"). The Dodd-Frank Act significantly restructured the financial regulatory regime in the United States and has had a broad impact on the financial services industry as a result of the significant regulatory and compliance changes required under the act. A summary of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act is set forth below:
Increased Capital Standards.  The federal banking agencies are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies. See "Capital Requirements" below. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act provides for newer and stronger standards.

Deposit Insurance.  The Dodd-Frank Act makes permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act also revise the assessment base against which an insured depository institution's deposit insurance premiums paid to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the "DIF") will be calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment base will no longer be the institution's deposit base, but rather its average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity during the assessment period.  Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act makes changes to the minimum designated reserve ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15% to 1.35% of the estimated amount of total insured deposits and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides that depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposits.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB").  The CFPB is charged with establishing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services.
Compensation Practices.  The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the appropriate federal regulators must establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe and unsound practice any compensation plan of a bank holding company or bank that provides an insider or other employee with "excessive compensation" or could lead to a material financial loss to such firm. In June 2010, prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies promulgated the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which requires that financial institutions establish metrics for measuring the impact of activities to achieve incentive compensation with the related risk to the financial institution of such behavior.
In 2017, Congress introduced legislation that would repeal or modify provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and significantly impact financial services regulation. Although the bills vary in content, certain key aspects include revisions to rules related to mortgage loans, delayed implementation of rules related to the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and raising the threshold for applying enhanced prudential standards to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets equal to or greater than $50 billion to those with total consolidated assets equal to or greater than $250 billion.
The Dodd-Frank Act has had, and may in the future have, a material impact on the Company’s operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from new and possible future consumer and fair lending regulations. The future changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may affect the profitability of business activities, require changes to certain business practices, impose more stringent regulatory requirements or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial condition of the Company and the Bank. These changes may also require the Company to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
Deposit Insurance

The deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDICDIF and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. On April 1, 2011, theThe deposit insurance assessment base changed from total deposits toof the Bank is based on its average total assets minus average tangible equity, pursuant to a rule issued by the FDIC as required by the Dodd-


Frank Act. Also on April 1, 2011, theDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"). The FDIC began utilizinguses a risk-based assessment system that imposed insurance premiums based upon a risk category matrix that took into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating. Effective July 1, 2016, the FDIC again changed its deposit insurance pricing and eliminated all risk categories and now uses the "financial ratios method" based on CAMELS composite ratings to determine assessment rates for small established institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.assets, such as the Bank. The CAMELS rating system is a supervisory rating system designed to take into account and reflect all financial and operational risks that a bank may face, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk ("CAMELS"). CAMELS composite ratings set a maximum assessment for CAMELS 1 and 2 rated banks, and set minimum assessments for lower rated institutions.

 In March 15, 2016, the FDIC implemented by final rule certain Dodd-Frank Act provisions by raising the DIF’sDIF's minimum reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. The FDIC imposed a 4.5 basis point annual surcharge on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The new rule grantsgranted credits to smaller banks, such as the Bank, for the portion of their regular assessments that contributecontributed to increasing the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%. Prior to when the new assessment system became effective, the Bank’s overall rate for assessment calculations was 9 basis points or less, which was within the range of assessment rates for the lowest risk category under the former FDIC assessment rules. In 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Company recorded expense of $538,000$864,000 and $647,000,$639,000, respectively, for FDIC insurance premiums.

In addition, all FDIC insured institutions are required to pay assessments to the FDIC at an annual rate of approximately one basis point of insured deposits to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, an agency of the federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the Savings Association Insurance Fund. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2019.

Capital Requirements

The FRB, the OCC and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to all banks and bank holding companies. In addition, those regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth. Under the risk-based capital requirements of these federal bank regulatory agencies that were effective through December 31, 2017,

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company and the Bank were requiredbecame subject to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital less certain specified deductions from total capital such as reciprocal holdings of depository institution capital instruments and equity investments) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%.  In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet activities, recourse obligations, residual interests and direct credit substitutes, were multiplied by a risk-weight factor assigned by the capital regulation based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. 

On June 7, 2012, the FRB issued a series of proposed rules intended to revise and strengthen its risk-based and leverage capital requirements and its method for calculating risk-weighted assets. The rules were proposed to implementimplementing the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the "Basel Committee") and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  On July 2, 2013, the FRB and the OCC approved certain revisions to the proposals and finalized new capital requirements for banking organizations.
Effective January 1, 2015, the final rules requiredAct (the "Basel III Capital Rules"). The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to comply with the following new minimum capital ratios: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% of risk-weighted assets (increased from the prior requirement of 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% of risk-weighted assets (unchanged from the prior requirement); and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4% of total assets (unchanged from the prior requirement).  These are the initial capital requirements, which will be phased-in over a four-year period.  When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the rules will require the Company and the  Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ("CET1") of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% "capital conservation buffer" (which is added to the 4.5% common equity Tier 1 ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum CET1 ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7% upon full implementation)), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation)), (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation)), and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets.
The capital conservation buffer, which was phased in ratably over a four year period beginning January 1, 2016, is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Institutions with a CET1 ratio above the minimum (4.5%) but below the minimum plus the conservation buffer (7.0%) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and discretionary compensation paid to certain officers, based on the amount of the shortfall. 

With respect to the Bank, the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the "FDIA") were also revised, effective as of January 1, 2015, to incorporate a CET1 ratio and to increase certain other capital ratios. To be well capitalized under the revised regulations, a bank must have the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a CET1 ratio of at least 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 8.0%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10.0%; and (iv) a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%. See "Prompt Corrective Action" below.

The Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted asset ratios of the Company were 13.42%13.73% and 14.39%14.61%, respectively, as of December 31, 2017,2021, thus exceeding the minimum requirements. The common equity TierCET 1 capital ratio of the Company was


11.50% 12.43% and the Bank was 12.79%13.15% as of December 31, 2017.2021. The Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted asset ratios of the Bank were 12.79%13.15% and 13.75%14.03%, respectively, as of December 31, 20172021, also exceeding the minimum requirements.

The phase-inBasel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. In July 2019, the federal banking agencies adopted final rules (the "Capital Simplification Rules") that, among other things, revised these deductions and adjustments. Following the adoption of the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress.  Banking institutions with a ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

With respect to the Bank, the rules also revised the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA by (i) introducing a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio requirement at each level (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum ratio for well-capitalized status being 8.0% (as compared to the prior ratio of 6.0%); and (iii) eliminating the current provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio and still be well-capitalized.  These new thresholds were effective for the Bank as of January 1, 2015.  The minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (10.0%) and minimum leverage ratio (5.0%) for well-capitalized status were unchanged by the final rules.
The new capital requirements also included changes in the risk weights of assets to better reflect credit risk and other risk exposures. These include a 150% risk weight (up from 100%) for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans and nonresidential mortgage loans that are 90 days past due or otherwise on nonaccrual status, a 20% (up from 0%) credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancelable, a 250% risk weight (up from 100%) for mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets that are not deducted from capital, and increased risk-weights (from 0% to up to 600%) for equity exposures.
In September 2017, the federal bank regulatory agencies proposed to revise and simplify the capital treatment forCapital Simplification Rules, certain deferred tax assets mortgage servicing assets,and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities and minority interests for banking organizations, such as the Bank, that are not subjectmust be deducted from CET1 to the advanced approaches requirements.extent that any one such category exceeds 25% of CET1. Prior to the adoption of the Capital Simplification Rules, amounts were deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeded 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceeded 15% of CET1. The Capital Simplification Rules took effect for the Company as of January 1, 2020. These limitations did not impact regulatory capital during any of the reported periods.

The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expanded the risk-weighting categories from the general risk-based capital rules to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity exposures (and higher percentages for certain other types of interests), and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. In November 2017,2019, the regulatoryfederal banking agencies revisedadopted a rule revising the capital rules enacted in 2013 to extend the current transitional treatmentscope of these items for non-advanced approaches banking organizations until the September 2017 proposal is finalized. The September 2017 proposal would also change the capital treatment of certain commercial real estate loans under the standardized approach, which the Bank usesmortgages subject to calculate its capital ratios.

a 150% risk weight.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as “Basel IV”"Basel IV"). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’sCommittee's standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally"unconditionally cancellable commitments," such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the proposed framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing-in through January 1, 2027. Under the current capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company. The impact of Basel IV on the Company and the Bank will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank regulatory agencies.

Based on management's understanding

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and interpretationConsumer Protection Act of 2018 (the "EGRRCPA") that permits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to be subject to a 9% leverage ratio (commonly referred to as the community bank leverage ratio or "CBLR"). Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% are not subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and are deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework has a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. The CBLR framework was first available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. These CBLR rules it believes that, as of December 31, 2017,were modified in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. See "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021"below. The Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements under such rules on a fully phased-in basis as if such requirements were in effect asdo not currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

The Company's principal source of cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to its shareholders, is dividends it receives from the Bank. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the Bank's payment of dividends to the Company. As a general rule, the amount of a dividend may not exceed, without prior regulatory approval, the sum of net income in the calendar year to date and the retained net earnings of the immediately preceding two calendar years. A depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would cause the institution to become "undercapitalized" or if it already is "undercapitalized." The OCC may prevent the payment of a dividend if it determines that the payment would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The OCC also has advised that a national bank should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.


Permitted Activities

As a bank holding company, American National Bankshares Inc. isthe permitted activities of the Company are limited to managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries, and engaging in other activities that the FRB determines by regulation or order to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the FRB must consider whether the performance of such an activity reasonably can be expected to produce benefits to the public that outweigh possible adverse effects. Possible benefits include greater convenience, increased competition, and gains in efficiency. Possible adverse effects include undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, and unsound banking practices. Despite prior approval, the FRB may order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to terminate ownership or control of any subsidiary when the FRB has reasonable cause to believe that a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company may result from such an activity.

Banking Acquisitions; Changes in Control

The BHC Act requires,and related regulations require, among other things, the prior approval of the FRB in any case where a bank holding company proposes to (i) acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any bank or bank holding company (unless it already owns a majority of such voting shares), (ii) acquire all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or (iii) merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, the FRB will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, the public benefits expected to be received from the acquisition, any outstanding regulatory compliance issues of any institution that is a party to the transaction, the projected capital ratios and levels on a post-acquisition basis, the financial condition of each institution that is a party to the transaction and of the combined institution after the transaction, the parties' managerial resources and risk management and governance processes and systems, the parties' compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering requirements, and the acquiring institution's performance under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the "CRA"), and its compliance with fair housing and other consumer protection laws.

Subject to certain exceptions, the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with the applicable regulations, require FRB approval (or, depending on the circumstances, no notice of disapproval) prior to any person or company acquiring "control" of a bank or bank holding company. A conclusive presumption of control exists if an individual or company acquires the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of an insured depository institution or to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities of any insured depository institution. A rebuttable presumption of control exists if a person or company acquires 10% or more but less than 25% of any class of voting securities of an insured depository institution and either the institution has registered its securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or no other person will own a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the acquisition. The Company's common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

In addition, Virginia law requires the prior approval of the SCC for (i) the acquisition by a Virginia bank holding company of more than 5% of the voting shares of a Virginia bank or any holding company that controls a Virginia bank, or (ii) the acquisition by a Virginia bank holding company of a bank or its holding company domiciled outside Virginia.

Source of Strength

FRB policy has historically required bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. The Dodd-Frank Act codified this policy as a statutory requirement. Under this requirement, the Company is expected to commit resources to support the Bank, including at times when the Company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.

Safety and Soundness

There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks by law and regulatory policy that are designed to minimize potential loss to the depositors of such depository institutions and the FDIC insurance fund in the event of a depository institution insolvency, receivership or default. For example, under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, to avoid receivership of an insured depository institution subsidiary, a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any subsidiary bank that may become "undercapitalized" with the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal bank regulatory agency up to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the institution's total assets at the time the institution became undercapitalized or (ii) the amount that is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all applicable capital standards as of the time the institution fails to comply with such capital restoration plan.


Under the FDIA, the federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating to capital management, internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, data security, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, risk management, vendor management, corporate governance, asset growth, and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risk and exposures specified in the guidelines.

Prompt Corrective Action

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA"), the federal bank regulatory agencies possess broad powers to take prompt corrective action to resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institution is "well capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized," "significantly undercapitalized," or "critically undercapitalized," as defined by the law.
Reflecting changes under"Well capitalized" institutions may generally operate without additional supervisory restriction. With respect to "adequately capitalized" institutions, such banks cannot normally pay dividends or make any capital contributions that would leave the new Basel IIIbank undercapitalized; they cannot pay a management fee to a controlling person if after paying the fee, it would be undercapitalized; and they cannot accept, renew, or rollover any brokered deposit unless the bank has applied for and been granted a waiver by the FDIC.

Immediately upon becoming "undercapitalized," a depository institution becomes subject to the provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, which: (i) restrict payment of capital requirements,distributions and management fees; (ii) require that the relevantappropriate federal banking agency monitor the condition of the institution and its efforts to restore its capital; (iii) require submission of a capital measures that became effective on January 1, 2015restoration plan; (iv) restrict the growth of the institution’s assets; and (v) require prior approval of certain expansion proposals. The appropriate federal banking agency for prompt corrective action are the total capital ratio, the common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the leverage ratio.  A bank will be (i) "well capitalized"an undercapitalized institution also may take any number of discretionary supervisory actions if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratioagency determines that any of 10.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratiothese actions is necessary to resolve the problems of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and is not subject to any capital directive order; (ii) "adequately capitalized" if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is not "well capitalized"; (iii) "undercapitalized" ifat the least possible long-term cost to the DIF, subject in certain cases to specified procedures. These discretionary supervisory actions include: (i) requiring the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio less than 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratioto raise additional capital; (ii) restricting transactions with affiliates; (iii) requiring divestiture of less than 6.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%; (iv) "significantly undercapitalized" if the institution hasor the sale of the institution to a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio less than 3.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0% or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%;willing purchaser; and (v) "critically undercapitalized" if(iv) any other supervisory action that the institution's tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institutionagency deems appropriate. These and additional mandatory and permissive supervisory actions may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination ratingtaken with respect to certain matters. A bank's capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations,significantly undercapitalized and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank's overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.critically undercapitalized institutions. Management believes, as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the CompanyBank met the requirements for being classified as "well capitalized."

As required by FDICIA, the federal bank regulatory agencies also have adopted guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards relating to, among other things, internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, and interest rate exposure.  In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines.  In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, an institution which has been notified that it is not in compliance with safety and soundness standard to submit a compliance plan.  If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized institution is subject under the prompt corrective action provisions described above.
Branching
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, national and state-chartered banks may open an initial branch in a state other than its home state (e.g., a host state) by establishing a de novo branch at any location in such host state at which a bank chartered in such host state could establish a branch. Applications to establish such branches must still be filed with the appropriate primary federal bank regulatory agency and state bank regulatory authorities may require applications or notices.

Transactions with Affiliates

Pursuant to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W, the authority of the Bank to engage in transactions with related parties or "affiliates" or to make loans to insiders is limited. Loan transactions with an affiliate generally must be collateralized and certain transactions between the Bank and its affiliates, including the sale of assets, the payment of money, or the provision of services, must be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing for comparable nonaffiliated transactions. In addition, the Bank generally may not purchase securities issued or underwritten by affiliates.

Loans to executive officers, directors or to any person who directly or indirectly, or acting through or in concert with one or more persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting securities of a bank, (a "10% Shareholders"), are subject to Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and their corresponding regulations


(Regulation (Regulation O) and Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act relating to the prohibition on personal loans to executives (which exempts financial institutions in compliance with the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act). Among other things, these loans must be made on terms substantially the same as those prevailing on transactions made to unaffiliated individuals and certain extensions of credit to those persons must first be approved in advance by a disinterested majority of the entire board of directors. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act prohibits loans to any of those individuals where the aggregate amount exceeds an amount equal to 15% of an institution's unimpaired capital and surplus plus an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus in the case of loans that are fully secured by readily marketable collateral, or when the aggregate amount on all of the extensions of credit outstanding to all of these persons would exceed the Bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act identifies limited circumstances in which the Bank is permitted to extend credit to executive officers.

Consumer Financial Protection

The Company is subject to a number of federal and state consumer protection laws that extensively govern its relationship with its customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Service Members Civil Relief Act, laws governing flood insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices, foreclosure laws, ,andand various regulations that implement some or all of the foregoing. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans and providing other services. If the Company fails to comply with these laws and regulations, it may be subject to various penalties. Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements may also result in failure to obtain any required bank regulatory approval for merger or acquisition transactions the Company may wish to pursue or being prohibited from engaging in such transactions even if approval is not required.

The Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the CFPB,Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the "CFPB"), and giving it responsibility for implementing, examining, and enforcing compliance with federal consumer protection laws. The CFPB focuses on (i) risks to consumers and compliance with the federal consumer financial laws, (ii) the markets in which firms operate and risks to consumers posed by activities in those markets, (iii) depository institutions that offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services, and (iv) non-depository companies that offer one or more consumer financial products or services.

The CFPB has broad rule makingrulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks, including, among other things, the authority to prohibit "unfair, deceptive or abusive" acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined as those that materially interfere with a consumer's ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service or take unreasonable advantage of a consumer's (i) lack of financial savvy, (ii) inability to protect himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services, or (iii) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer's interests. The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB may also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or injunction.

Further regulatory positions taken by the CFPB may influence how other regulatory agencies may apply the subject consumer financial protection laws and regulations.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank's record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. Furthermore, such assessment is also required of banks that have applied, among other things, to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of an insured depository institution, or to open or relocate a branch. In the case of a BHC applying for approval to acquire a bank or BHC, the record of each subsidiary bank of the applicant BHC is subject to assessment in considering the application. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve," or "substantial non-compliance." The CompanyBank was rated "satisfactory" in its most recent CRA evaluation.


 

Anti-Money Laundering Legislation

The Company is subject to several federal laws that are designed to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and transactions with persons, companies or foreign governments designated by U.S. authorities ("AML laws"). This category of laws includes the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, and other anti-money launderingthe Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020.

The AML laws and their implementing regulations including the USA Patriot Act of 2001.  Amongrequire insured depository institutions, broker-dealers, and certain other things, thesefinancial institutions to have policies, procedures, and controls to detect, prevent, and report money laundering and terrorist financing. The AML laws and their regulations require the Companyalso provide for information sharing, subject to conditions, between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, for counter-terrorism purposes. Federal banking regulators are required, when reviewing bank holding company acquisition and bank merger applications, to take steps to prevent the use of the Company for facilitating the flow of illegal or illicit money, to report large currency transactions, and to file suspicious activity reports.  The Company is also required to carry out a comprehensive anti-money laundering compliance program.  Violations can result in substantial civil and criminal sanctions.  In addition, provisions of the USA Patriot Act require the federal bank regulatory agencies to considerinto account the effectiveness of a financial institution'sthe anti-money laundering activities when reviewing bank mergersof the applicants. To comply with these obligations, the Company has implemented appropriate internal practices, procedures, and BHC acquisitions.


controls.

Office of Foreign Assets Control

The U.S. Treasury Department’sDepartment's Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”("OFAC") is responsible for administering and enforcing economic and trade sanctions against specified foreign parties, including countries and regimes, foreign individuals and other foreign organizations and entities. OFAC publishes lists of prohibited parties that are regularly consulted by the Company in the conduct of its business in order to assure compliance. The Company is responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of, and transactions with, prohibited parties identified by OFAC, avoiding unlicensed trade and financial transactions with such parties and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence. Failure to comply with OFAC requirements could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences for the Company.

Privacy Legislation

Several recent laws, including the Right to Financial Privacy Act, and related regulations issued by the federal bank regulatory agencies, also provide new protections against the transfer and use of customer information by financial institutions. A financial institution must provide to its customers information regarding its policies and procedures with respect to the handling of customers' personal information. Each institution must conduct an internal risk assessment of its ability to protect customer information. These privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer's personal financial information to unaffiliated parties without prior notice and approval from the customer.

customer.

Incentive Compensation

In June 2010, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of financial institutions do not undermine the safety and soundness of such institutions by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of a financial institutions, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a financial institution's incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the institution's ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the financial institution's board of directors.

Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC to establish joint regulations or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities that encourage inappropriate risk-taking by providing an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. The federal banking agencies issued such proposed rules in March 2011 and issued a revised proposed rule in June 2016 implementing the requirements and prohibitions set forth in Section 956. The revised proposed rule would apply to all banks, among other institutions, with at least $1 billion in average total consolidated assets, like the Bank, for which it would go beyond the existing Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies to (i) prohibit certain types and features of incentive-based compensation arrangements for senior executive officers, (ii) require incentive-based compensation arrangements to adhere to certain basic principles to avoid a presumption of encouraging inappropriate risk, (iii) require appropriate board or committee oversight, and (iv) establish minimum recordkeeping, and (v) mandate disclosures to the appropriate federal banking agency.

The proposed rules have not yet been finalized.

The FRB will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of financial institutions, such as the Company, that are not "large, complex banking organizations." These reviews will be tailored to each financial institution based on the scope and complexity of the institution's activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be incorporated into the institution's supervisory ratings, which can affect the institution's ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a financial institution if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the institution's safety and soundness and the financial institution is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had not been made aware of any instances of non-compliance with the final guidance.

Ability-to-Repay
 

Mortgage Banking Regulation

In connection with making mortgage loans, the Bank is subject to rules and Qualified Mortgage Rule

Pursuantregulations that, among other things, establish standards for loan origination, prohibit discrimination, provide for inspections and appraisals of property, require credit reports on prospective borrowers, in some cases restrict certain loan features and fix maximum interest rates and fees, require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit and settlement costs, limit payment for settlement services to the Dodd-Frank Act,reasonable value of the CFPB issued a final ruleservices rendered and require the maintenance and disclosure of information regarding the disposition of mortgage applications based on January 10, 2013 (effective on January 10, 2014), amendingrace, gender, geographical distribution and income level. The Bank is also subject to rules and regulations that require the collection and reporting of significant amounts of information with respect to mortgage loans and borrowers. The Bank’s mortgage origination activities are subject to the FRB’s Regulation Z, as implemented bywhich implements the Truth in Lending Act, requiring mortgage lendersAct. Certain provisions of Regulation Z require creditors to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Mortgage lenders are required to determine consumers' ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider the following eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision: (i) current or reasonably expected income or assets; (ii) current employment status; (iii) the

monthly payment on the covered transaction; (iv) the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan; (v) the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; (vi) current debt obligations, alimony, and child support; (vii) the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and (viii) credit history. Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate "qualified mortgages," which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements. In general, a "qualified mortgage" is a mortgage loan without negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a qualified mortgage the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount. Qualified mortgages that are "higher-priced" (e.g. subprime loans) garner a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay rules, while qualified mortgages that are not "higher-priced" (e.g. prime loans) are given a safe harbor of compliance. The Company is predominantly an originator of compliant qualified mortgages.

Cybersecurity

In March 2015, federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates that financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of the financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’sinstitution's management is expected to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’sinstitution's operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If the Company fails to observe the regulatory guidance, it could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.

On November 18, 2021, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule, effective April 1, 2022, imposing new notification requirements for cybersecurity incidents. The rule requires financial institutions to notify their primary federal regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after the institution determines that a cybersecurity incident has occurred that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the institution’s: (i) ability to carry out banking operations, activities, or processes, or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, in the ordinary course of business, (ii) business line(s), including associated operations, services, functions, and support, that upon failure would result in a material loss of revenue, profit, or franchise value, or (iii) operations, including associated services, functions and support, as applicable, the failure or discontinuance of which would pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States.

To date, the Company has not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, but its systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that the Company could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("Appropriations Act") was signed into law on December 27, 2020. Among other things, the CARES Act and Appropriations Act include the following provisions impacting financial institutions:

Community Bank Leverage Ratio.  The CARES Act directed federal banking agencies to adopt interim final rules to lower the threshold under the CBLR from 9% to 8% and to provide a reasonable grace period for a community bank that falls below the threshold to regain compliance, in each case until the earlier of the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020.  In April 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued two interim final rules implementing this directive.  One interim final rule provided that, as of the second quarter 2020, banking organizations with leverage ratios of 8% or greater (and that meet the other existing qualifying criteria) may elect to use the CBLR framework.  It also established a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall below the 8% CBLR requirement, so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater.  The second interim final rule provided a transition from the temporary 8% CBLR requirement to a 9% CBLR requirement.  It established a minimum CBLR of 8% for the second through fourth quarters of 2020, 8.5% for 2021, and 9% thereafter, and established a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall no more than 100 basis points below the applicable CBLR requirement. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank was a qualifying community banking organization, but elected not to measure capital adequacy under the CBLR framework.

Temporary Troubled Debt Restructurings Relief.  The CARES Act allowed banks to elect to suspend requirements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic (for loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019) that would otherwise be categorized as a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"), including impairment for accounting purposes, until the earlier of 60 days after the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020.  Federal banking agencies are required to defer to the determination of the banks making such suspension.  The Appropriations Act extended this temporary relief until January 1, 2022. The Company did not have any COVID-19 pandemic loan modifications as of December 31, 2021.

Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program.  The CARES Act created the Small Business Administration ("SBA") Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") and it was extended by the Appropriations Act.  Under the PPP, money was authorized for small business loans to pay payroll and group health costs, salaries and commissions, mortgage and rent payments, utilities, and interest on other debt.  The loans were provided through participating financial institutions, such as the Bank, that processed loan applications and service the loans.

Future Legislation and Regulation

Congress may enact legislation from time to time that affects the regulation of the financial services industry, and state legislatures may enact legislation from time to time affecting the regulation of financial institutions chartered by or operating in those states. Federal and state regulatory agencies also periodically propose and adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. The substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulation, or the application thereof, cannot be predicted, although enactment of the proposed legislation could impactaffect the regulatory structure under which the Company and the Bank operate and may significantly increase costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes, require an increase in regulatory capital, require modifications to business strategy, and limit the ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or the Bank could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company and the Bank.

Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies

The Company's operations are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various regulatory authorities. In particular, the FRB regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant impact on overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits; they affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for time and savings deposits. FRB monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks, including the Company, in the past and are expected to do so in the future. As a result, it is difficult for the Company to predict the potential effects of possible changes in monetary policies upon its future operating results.

Tax Reform

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”). The legislation made key changes to the U.S. tax law, including the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.

As a result of the reductionenactment of the CARES Act in 2020, the Company recognized a tax benefit for the net operating loss ("NOL") five-year carryback provision for the NOL acquired in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% under the Tax Reform Act, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional $2.7 million tax expense in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the new law and refining its calculations, which could affect the measurement of these assets and liabilities or give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.

Employees
HomeTown merger.

Human Capital Resources

At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company employed 328327 full-time equivalentpersons and 44 part-time persons. In the opinion of the management of the Company, the relationship with employees of the Company and the Bank is good.


As a holding company for a community bank, the Company is a relationship-driven organization. A key aspect of the Company’s business strategy is for its senior officers to have primary contact with current and potential customers. The Company’s growth and development are in large part a result of these personalized relationships with the customer base. The success of the Company also often depends on its ability to hire and retain qualified banking officers. The Company’s senior officers have considerable experience in the banking industry and related financial services and are extremely valuable.

The Company’s senior officer compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate bankers with the ability to generate strong business results and ensure the long-term success of the Company. The compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors has established compensation programs that reflect and support the Company’s strategic and financial performance goals, the primary goal being the creation of long-term value for the shareholders of the Company, while protecting the interests of the depositors of the Bank. In addition to competitive base and incentive compensation, the Company offers competitive benefits including paid vacation and sick leave, a 401(k) plan, health, dental, and vision plans, life and disability coverage, and a wellness plan. The Company has also entered into employment contracts with certain of its senior officers, and purchased key man life insurance policies to mitigate the risk of an unforeseen departure or death of certain of the senior officers.

In addition, the Company’s strategic plan has dedicated objectives and tactics to ensure it recruits, retains, and develops a diverse and talented team, with a specific focus on enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Internet Access to Company Documents

The Company provides access to its Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")SEC filings through a link on the Investor Relations page of the Company's website at www.amnb.com. Reports available at no cost include the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are filed electronically with the SEC. The information on the Company's website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other filing the Company makes with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

Executive Officers of the Company

The following table lists as of December 31, 2017, the executive officers of the Company, their ages, and their positions:

Name

Age

Position

NameAgePosition

Jeffrey V. Haley

57

61

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since January 2013; prior thereto,2013. President of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since January 2012; prior thereto,2012. Executive Vice President of the Company from June 2010 to December 2011; prior thereto,2011. Senior Vice President of the Company from July 2008 to May 2010;2010. President of the Bank since June 2010; prior thereto,2010. Executive Vice President of the Bank, as well as President of Trust and Financial Services from July 2008 to May 2010; prior thereto,2010. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank from November 2005 to June 2007.

William

Jeffrey W. TraynhamFarrar

62

61

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company since January 2015.October 2019. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the Bank since August 2019. Senior Vice President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Old Point Financial Corporation from June 2017 to August 2019. Director of Wealth Management, Mortgage and CashierInsurance for Union Bankshares Corporation (now Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation) from January 2014 to June 2017. Chief Financial Officer of the Bank since April 2009.StellarOne Corporation and its predecessor companies from January 1996 to June 2017.

H. Gregg StraderEdward C. Martin 5948 Executive Vice President and Chief BankingAdministrative Officer of the Company since January 2015. Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of the Bank since January 2014. Executive Viceand President of the Bank from June 2013 until December 2013.Virginia Banking since August 2020. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of IBERIABANK Corporationthe Company from 2010 to June 2013.
Edward C. Martin44December 2019 until August 2020. Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank sincefrom March 2017.2017 until August 2020. Senior Credit Officer of the Bank from September 2016 until March 2017. Regional Credit Officer of Bank of North Carolina from July 2015 to September 2016. Chief Credit Officer of Valley Bank from June 2007 to June 2015.

Rhonda P. Joyce

58

Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Banking: Commercial of the Bank since November 2021. Executive Vice President and Regional President of the Bank from September 2016 until November 2021. Senior Vice President and Market President since joining the Bank in connection with the MidCarolina Financial Corporation merger in July 2011.
Alexander Jung53Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Banking: Consumer & Financial Services of the Bank since November 2021. Senior Vice President and President of the North Carolina Market, Blue Ridge Bank, N.A. from September 2020 to October 2021. Various leadership roles in commercial, retail and mortgage banking at Branch Banking and Trust Company from March 1993 to December 2018.

John H. Settle, Jr. 

63

Executive Vice President and President of Wealth Management since October 2016. Senior Vice President and Senior Fiduciary Advisory Specialist with Wells Fargo Private Bank from March 2012 to October 2016. Prior thereto, Managing Director with SunTrust Private Wealth Management.

COVID-19 Impact and Response

In March 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 was recognized as a global pandemic. The spread of the virus has created a global health crisis that has resulted in unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer activity in the United States and globally.  Governmental efforts in response to the outbreak in 2020 and 2021 have affected business operations and consumer activity.  The Company responded during the periods with measures to ensure employee and customer safety, maintain customer service levels, and continue operations while complying with applicable laws and regulations. Mid-2020, the Company implemented a business continuity plan and protocols to continue to maintain a high level of care for its employees, customers and communities. The Company also transitioned a majority of its non-branch employees to working remotely and assisting customers by appointment only in branches or directing them to drive-thrus or ATMs. It cancelled all business travel, and has held all Company meetings through virtual platforms. In the fall of 2021, branches were re-opened with safety protocols in place but were from time to time reverted back to appointment only or drive-thru only as Covid-19 circulated. The Company continues to maintain remote work options for a portion of its employees, continues to limit non-essential business travel and continues to hold meetings virtually. 
The CARES Act which was signed into law March 27, 2020, provided for multiple programs to assist small businesses and consumers, including through the PPP. The bank regulatory agencies issued guidance allowing financial institutions to work with borrowers to make loan modifications to borrowers who were current prior to the pandemic, to not be treated as TDRs nor be considered past due. The Bank implemented a disaster assistance program which assisted customers with aggregrate loan balances of approximately $405.1 million outstanding during 2020. The majority of loans with deferrals resumed making normal payments prior to the end of 2020, with the remainder of the deferral periods ending in 2021. The Company processed a total of $364.2 million in PPP loans and had outstanding net PPP loans of $12.2 million at December 31, 2021 and $211.3 million at December 31, 2020.  
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to the Company's Business
The Company's business is subject to interest rate risk, and variations in interest rates and inadequate management of interest rate risk may negatively affect financial performance.
Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company's profits.  It is expected that the Company will continue to realize income from the spread between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities.  Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.  In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and the current interest rate environment encourages extreme competition for new loan originations from qualified borrowers.  Management cannot ensure that it can minimize the Company's interest rate risk. While an increase in the general level of interest rates may increase the loan yield and the net interest margin, it may adversely affect the ability of certain borrowers with variable rate loans to pay the interest and principal of their obligations.  In addition, rising interest rates may result in the Company’s interest expense increasing, with a commensurate adverse effect on net interest income, particularly if the Company must pay interest on demand deposits to attract or retain customer accounts. As interest rates increase, deposit costs will continue to increase, which could adversely impact the Company’s net interest income. In a rising rate environment, competition for cost-effective deposits can be expected to increase, making it more costly for the Company to fund loan growth. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect the net interest spread, asset quality, loan origination volume, and overall profitability of the Company.

The Company faces strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer banking and other financial services, which could negatively affect the Company's business.
The Company encounters substantial competition from other financial institutions in its market area.  Ultimately, the Company may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Many competitors offer the same banking services that the Company offers.  These competitors include national, regional, and community banks.  The Company also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including savings banks, finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, financial subsidiaries of certain industrial corporations, and mortgage companies.  In particular, competitors include several major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations and ATMs and conduct extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Increased competition may result in reduced business for the Company.
Additionally, banks and other financial institutions with larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the credit needs of larger customers. These institutions also may have differing pricing and underwriting standards, which may adversely affect the Company through the loss of business or causing a misalignment in the Company’s risk-return relationship. Areas of competition include interest rates for loans and deposits, efforts to obtain loans and deposits, and range and quality of products and services provided, including new technology-driven products and services.  Technological innovation continues to contribute to greater competition in domestic financial services markets as technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services.  If the Company is unable to attract and retain banking customers, it may be unable to continue to grow loan and deposit portfolios and its results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.
The Company's business is directly impacted by economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond the Company's control.  A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national or local events, especially within the Company's market area, could result in potentially negative material consequences such as the following, among others: loan delinquencies increasing; problem assets and foreclosures increasing; demand for products and services decreasing; low cost or noninterest bearing deposits decreasing; and collateral for loans, especially real estate, declining in value, in turn reducing customers' borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans.  Each of these consequences may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Trust division income is a major source of non-interest income for the Company.  Trust and Brokerage fee revenue is largely dependent on the fair market value of assets under management and on trading volumes in the brokerage business. General economic conditions and their subsequent effect on the securities markets tend to act in correlation.  When general economic conditions deteriorate, securities markets generally decline in value, and the Company's Trust and Brokerage fee revenue are negatively impacted as asset values and trading volumes decrease.

CREDIT RISK

The Company's credit standards and its on-going credit assessment processes might not protect it from significant credit losses.

The Company takes credit risk by virtue of making loans and extending loan commitments and letters of credit. The Company manages credit risk through a program of underwriting standards, the review of certain credit decisions and an on-going process of assessment of the quality of the credit already extended. The Company's exposure to credit risk is managed through the use of consistent underwriting standards that emphasize local lending while avoiding highly leveraged transactions as well as excessive industry and other concentrations. The Company's credit administration function employs risk management techniques to help ensure that problem loans are promptly identified. While these procedures are designed to provide the Company with the information needed to implement policy adjustments where necessary and to take appropriate corrective actions, and have proven to be reasonably effective to date, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding future undue credit risk.

The Company's focus on lending to small to mid-sized community-based businesses may increase its credit risk.

Most of the Company's commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers. These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions. Additionally, these loans may increase concentration risk as to industry or collateral securing the loans. If general economic conditions in the market areas in which the Company operates negatively impact this important customer sector, the Company's results of operations and financial condition may be


adversely affected. Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by the Company in recent years, and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle. The deterioration of the borrowers' businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company depends on the accuracy and completeness of information about clients and counterparties, and its financial condition could be adversely affected if it relies on misleading information.

In deciding whether to extend credit or to enter into other transactions with clients and counterparties, the Company may rely on information furnished to it by or on behalf of clients and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information, which the Company does not independently verify. The Company also may rely on representations of clients and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to clients, the Company may assume that a customer's audited financial statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP")GAAP and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. The Company's financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent it relies on financial statements that do not comply with GAAP or are materially misleading.

The allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,GAAP, an allowance for loan losses is maintained by the Company to provide for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual credit losses, and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect operating results. The allowance for loan losses is based on prior experience, as well as an evaluation of the risks in the current portfolio. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating, and other outside forces and conditions, including changes in interest rates, all of which are beyond the Company's control; and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal bank regulatory agencies, as a part of their examination process, review the Company's loans and allowance for loan losses. While management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover current losses, it cannot make assurances that it will not further increase the allowance for loan losses or that regulators will not require it to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could adversely affect earnings.

In addition, the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, as amended, could result in a change in the amount of the allowance for loan losses as a result of changing from an "incurred loss" model, which encompasses allowances for current known and inherent losses within the portfolio, to an "expected loss" model, which encompasses allowances for losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio. As a smaller reporting company at the one-time evaluation date, the Company has elected to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13 until January 2023. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The Company's nonperforming assets adversely affect its net income in various ways. The Company does not record interest income on nonaccrual loans, which adversely affects its income and increases credit administration costs. When the Company receives collateral through foreclosures and similar proceedings, it is required to mark the related asset to the then fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, which may, and often does, result in a loss. An increase in the level of nonperforming assets also increases the Company's risk profile and may impact the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of such risks. The Company utilizes various techniques such as workouts, restructurings, and loan sales to manage problem assets. Increases in or negative adjustments in the value of these problem assets, the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers' performance or financial condition, could adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and staff, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities, including generation of new loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will avoid increases in nonperforming loans in the future.

A downturn in the local real estate market could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.

The Company offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity lines of credit, consumer and other loans. Many of these loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) located in the Company's market area. A downturn in the real estate market in the areas in which the Company conducts its operations could negatively affect the Company's business because significant portions of its loans are secured by real estate. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had approximately $1.3$1.9 billion in loans, of which approximately $1.1$1.6 billion (80.8%(84.2%) were secured by real estate. The ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral could then be diminished and the Company would be more likely to suffer losses.

Substantially all of the Company's real property collateral is located in its market area. If there is a decline in real estate values, especially in the Company's market area, the collateral for loans would deteriorate and provide significantly less security.


The Company relies upon independent appraisals to determine the value of the real estate which secures a significant portion of its loans, and the values indicated by such appraisals may not be realizable if the Company is forced to foreclose upon such loans.

A significant portion of the Company's loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate. The Company relies upon independent appraisers to estimate the value of such real estate. Appraisals are only estimates of value and the independent appraisers may make mistakes of fact or judgment which adversely affect the reliability of their appraisals. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to increase or decrease. As a result of any of these factors, the real estate securing some of the Company's loans may be more or less valuable than anticipated at the time the loans were made. If a default occurs on a loan secured by real estate that is less valuable than originally estimated, the Company may not be able to recover the outstanding balance of the loan and will suffer a loss.

MARKET RISK
The Company's business is subject to interest rate risk, and variations in interest rates and inadequate management of interest rate risk may negatively affect financial performance.

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company's profits. It is expected that the Company is dependentwill continue to realize income from the spread between the interest earned on key personnelloans, securities, and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affectcurrent interest rate environment encourages extreme competition for new loan originations from qualified borrowers. Management cannot ensure that it can minimize the Company's operations and prospects.interest rate risk.
The Company is a relationship-driven organization. A key aspect of

If the Company’s business strategy is for its senior officers to have primary contact with current and potential customers. The Company’s growth and development is in large part a result of these personalized relationships with the customer base. The success of the Company also often dependsinterest rates paid on its ability to hire and retain qualified banking officers.

The Company’s senior officers have considerable experience in the banking industry and related financial services and are extremely valuable and would be difficult to replace. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect upon future prospects. Although the Company has entered into employment contracts with certain of its senior executive officers, and purchased key man life insurance policies to mitigate the risk of an unforeseen departure or death of certain of the senior executive officers, it cannot offer any assurance that theydeposits and other key employees will remain employed byborrowings increase at a faster rate than the Company. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effectinterest rates received on operations and possibly result in reduced revenues.
The inability of the Company to successfully manage its growth or implement its growth strategy may adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future.  In addition, the ability to manage growth successfully depends on whether the Company can maintain adequate capital levels, cost controls and asset quality, and successfully integrate any businesses acquired into the Company.
As the Company continues to implement its growth strategy by opening new branches or acquiring branches or banks, it expects to incur increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses.  In the case of new branches, the Company must absorb those higher expenses while it begins to generate new deposits; there is also further time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets.  The Company's plans to expand could depress earnings in the short run, even if it efficiently executes a branching strategy leading to long-term financial benefits.
Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities withinvestments, the Company's own operations may prevent the Company from achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions.
The Company may not be able to achieve fully the strategic objectivesnet interest income, and operating efficiencies expected in an acquisition.  Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired entity.  In addition, the markets and industries in which the Company and its potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive.  The Company may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition; the Company may lose key personnel, either from the acquired entity or from itself; and the Company may not be able to control the incremental increase in noninterest expense arising from an acquisition in a manner that improves its overall operating efficiencies.  These factors could contribute to the Company's not achieving the expected benefits from its acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all.  Future business acquisitionstherefore earnings, could be material toadversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the Companyinterest rates received on loans and it may issue additional shares of common stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders' ownership interests.  Acquisitions also could requireother investments fall more quickly than the Company to useinterest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Any substantial, cashunexpected, or other liquid assets or to incur debt; the Company could therefore become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.
The Company is subject to extensive regulation which could adversely affect its business.
The Company's operations as a publicly traded corporation, a bank holding company, and an insured depository institution are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state, and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and

judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on part or all of the Company's operations.  Because the Company's business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to it are subject to frequent and sometimes extensive change. Such changes could include higher capital requirements, increased insurance premiums, increased compliance costs, reductions of non-interest income and limitations on services that can be provided.  Actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defend itself and may lead to liability or penalties that materially affect the Company and its shareholders. Any future changesprolonged change in the laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Company may negatively affect the Company's business and results of operations.
Recently enacted capital standards may have an adverse effect on the Company's profitability, lending, and ability to pay dividends on the Company's securities.
In July 2013, the FRB and the OCC released final rules which implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms from the Basel Committee and certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the final rules, minimum requirements for both the quality and quantity of capital held by banking organizations have increased. Consistent with the international Basel framework, the rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that applies to all supervised financial institutions. The rule also, among other things, raised the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6% and included a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking organizations. The new rules became effective January 1, 2015. The potential impact of the new capital rules includes, but is not limited to, reduced lending and negative pressure on profitability and return on equity due to the higher capital requirements. To the extent the Company is required to increase capital in the future to comply with the new capital rules, its ability to pay dividends on its securities may be reduced.
In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as “Basel IV”). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the proposed framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing-in through January 1, 2027. Under the current capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company. The impact of Basel IV on the Company and the Bank will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank regulatory agencies.
New regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau could adversely the Company's earnings.
The CFPB has broad rule making authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB issued a final rule effective January 10, 2014, requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms, or to originate "qualified mortgages" that meet specific requirements with respect to terms, pricing and fees. The new rule also contains new disclosure requirements at mortgage loan origination and in monthly statements. These requirements could limit the Company's ability to make certain types of loans or loans to certain borrowers, or could make it more expensive and/or time consuming to make these loans, which could adversely impact the Company's profitability.
Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.
From time to time, with increasing frequency, there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company's financial statements.  These changes can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations.  In some instances, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
Failure to maintain effective systems of internal and disclosure controlmarket interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operation and financial condition.
Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary foroperations.

The expected replacement or discontinuation of the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfullyLondon Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") as a public company.  Ifbenchmark interest rate and a transition to an alternative reference interest rate could present operational problems and result in market disruption.

The administrator of LIBOR has announced its intention to extend the Companypublication of most tenors of LIBOR for U.S. dollars through June 30, 2023 and ceased publishing other LIBOR tenors on December 31, 2021. Management cannot provide reliablepredict whether or when LIBOR will actually cease to be available, whether the Secured Overnight Funding Rate ("SOFR"), will become the market benchmark in its place or what impact such a transition may have on the Company’s business, financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputationcondition and operating results would be harmed.  As partof operations.

The FRB, based on the recommendations of the Company's ongoing monitoringFederal Reserve Bank of internal control,New York’s Alternative Reference Rate Committee, has begun publishing SOFR, which is intended to replace LIBOR, and has encouraged banks to transition away from LIBOR as soon as practicable. Although SOFR appears to be the preferred replacement rate for LIBOR, it is unclear if other benchmarks may discover material weaknessesemerge or if other rates will be adopted outside of the United States. The replacement of LIBOR also may result in economic mismatches between different categories of instruments that now consistently rely on the LIBOR benchmark. Markets are slowly developing in response to these new rates, and questions around liquidity in these rates and how to appropriately adjust these rates to eliminate any economic value transfer at the time of transition remain a significant deficiencies in its internal control that require remediation.  A "material weakness" is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.


concern.

The Company has inan insignificant number of loans, borrowings and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition should not change the past discovered,Company's market risk profiles but will require changes to risk and may inpricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with customers could adversely impact the future discover, areas of its internal controls that need improvement.  Even so,Company's reputation. Although the Company is continuingcurrently unable to work to improve its internal controls.  The Company cannotassess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, certain that these measures will ensure that it implements and maintains adequate controls over its financial processes and reporting in the future.  Any failure to maintain effective controls or to timely effect any necessary improvement ofadequately manage the Company's internal and disclosure controls could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm the Company's reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the Company's reported financial information, all of whichtransition could have a materialan adverse effect on the Company's results of operationbusiness, financial condition and financial condition.

The carrying value of goodwill may be adversely impacted.
When the Company completes an acquisition, generally goodwill is recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset.  Current accounting guidance requires for goodwill to be tested for impairment, which the Company performs an impairment analysis at least annually, rather than amortizing it over a period of time.  A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the Company's common stock could require the asset to become impaired.  If impaired, the Company would incur a non-cash charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations.  The carrying value

15

LIQUIDITY RISK

The Company may need to raise additional capital in the future to continue to grow, but may be unable to obtain additional capital on favorable terms or at all.

Federal and state banking regulators and safe and sound banking practices require the Company to maintain adequate levels of capital to support its operations. Although the Company currently has no specific plans for additional offices, itsThe Company's business strategy calls for it to continue to grow in its existing banking markets (internally and through additional offices) and to expand into new markets as appropriate opportunities arise. Continued growth in the Company's earning assets, which may result from internal expansion and new branch offices, at rates in excess of the rate at which its capital is increased through retained earnings, will reduce the Company's capital ratios. If the Company's capital ratios fell below "well capitalized" levels, the FDIC deposit insurance assessment rate would increase until capital was restored and maintained at a "well capitalized" level. A higher assessment rate would cause an increase in the assessments the Company pays for federal deposit insurance, which would have an adverse effect on the Company's operating results.

Management of the Company believes that its current and projected capital position is sufficient to maintain capital ratios significantly in excess of regulatory requirements for the next several years and allow the Company flexibility in the timing of any possible future efforts to raise additional capital. However, if, in the future, the Company needs to increase its capital to fund additional growth or satisfy regulatory requirements, its ability to raise that additional capital will depend on conditions at that time in the capital markets, economic conditions, the Company's financial performance and condition, and other factors, many of which are outside its control. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital on terms favorable to it or at all. Any future inability to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to the Company may have a material adverse effect on its ability to expand operations, and on its financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company's business infrastructure.
Third parties provide key components of the Company's business operations such as data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access.  While the Company has selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions.  Any problem caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cybersecurity breaches, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, could adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver products and services to its customers and otherwise conduct its business.  Financial or operational difficulties of a third party vendor could also hurt the Company's operations if those difficulties interface with the vendor's ability to serve the Company.  Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense.  Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to the Company's business operations.
The Company's exposure to operational, technological and organizational risk may adversely affect the Company.
The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputation, legal, and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.
Negative public opinion can result from the actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, and acquisitions, and from actions taken by government regulators and community

organizations in response to those activities.  Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company's ability to attract and retain customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.
Certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company's necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect.  The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company's (or its vendors') business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

TECHNOLOGY RISK

The Company's operations may be adversely affected by cybersecurity risks.

The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct business. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company's internet banking, deposit, loan, and other systems. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of such failure, interruption, or security breach of the Company's information systems, there can be no assurance that they will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Further, to access the Company’sCompany's products and services, its customers may use computers and mobile devices that are beyond the Company’sCompany's security control systems. The occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of the Company's communications and information systems could damage the Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Additionally, the Company outsources its data processing to a third party. If the Company's third party provider encounters difficulties or if the Company has difficulty in communicating with such third party, it will significantly affect the Company's ability to adequately process and account for customer transactions, which would significantly affect its business operations.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company collects and stores sensitive data, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of its customers and employees in systems and on networks. The secure processing, maintenance and use of this information is critical to operations and the Company's business strategy. The Company has invested in accepted technologies, and annually reviews processes and practices that are designed to protect its networks, computers and data from damage or unauthorized access. Despite these security measures, the Company's computer systems and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. A breach of any kind could compromise systems, and the information stored there could be accessed, damaged or disclosed. A breach in security could result in legal claims, regulatory penalties, disruption in operations, and damage to the Company's reputation, which could adversely affect the Company's business. Furthermore, as cyberattacks continue to evolve and increase, the Company may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify or enhance its protective measures, or to investigate and remediate any identified information security vulnerabilities.

Multiple major U.S. retailers, financial institutions, government agencies and departments have experienced data systems incursions reportedly resulting in the thefts of credit and debit card information, online account information, and other financial data of tens of millions of individuals and customers. Retailer incursions affect cards issued and deposit accounts maintained by many financial institutions, including the Bank. Although neither the Company's nor the Bank's systems are breached in government or retailer incursions, these events can cause the Bank to reissue a significant number of cards and take other costly steps to avoid significant theft loss to the Bank and its customers. In some cases, the Bank may be required to reimburse customers for the losses they incur. Other possible points of intrusion or disruption not within the Company's nor the Bank's control include internet service providers, electronic mail portal providers, social media portals, distant-server (so called "cloud") service providers, electronic data security providers, personal computers and mobile phones, telecommunications companies, and mobile phone manufacturers.

Consumers may increasingly decide not to use the Bank to complete their financial transactions because of technological and other changes, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition and operations.

Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions through alternative methods that historically have involved banks. In particular, the activity of fintech companies has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Fintech companies have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products and some fintech companies have applied for bank charters. In addition, other fintech companies have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The Company’s risk-management frameworkprocess of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as "disintermediation," could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

OPERATIONAL RISK

The Company is dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect the Company's operations and prospects.

The Company is a relationship-driven organization. A key aspect of the Company's business strategy is for its senior officers to have primary contact with current and potential customers. The Company's growth and development are in large part a result of these personalized relationships with the customer base. The success of the Company also often depends on its ability to hire and retain qualified banking officers.

The Company's senior officers have considerable experience in the banking industry and related financial services and are extremely valuable and would be difficult to replace. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect upon future prospects. Although the Company has entered into employment contracts with certain of its senior executive officers, and purchased key man life insurance policies to mitigate the risk of an unforeseen departure or death of certain of the senior executive officers, it cannot offer any assurance that they and other key employees will remain employed by the Company. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on operations and possibly result in reduced revenues.

Failure to maintain effective systems of internal and disclosure control could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.

Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputation and operating results would be harmed. As part of the Company's ongoing monitoring of internal control, it may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in its internal control that require remediation. A "material weakness" is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company's annual or interim financial statements will not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company maintains an enterprise risk management programhas in the past discovered, and may in the future discover, areas of its internal controls that need improvement. Even so, the Company is designedcontinuing to identify, quantify, monitor, report, and control the riskswork to improve its internal controls. The Company cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that it faces. These risks include, but are not limited to: strategic, interest-rate, credit, liquidity,implements and maintains adequate controls over its financial processes and reporting in the future. Any failure to maintain effective controls or to timely effect any necessary improvement of the Company's internal and disclosure controls could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm the Company's reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the Company's reported financial information, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operation and financial condition.

The carrying value of goodwill may be adversely impacted.

When the Company completes an acquisition, generally goodwill is recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset. Current accounting guidance requires for goodwill to be tested for impairment, which the Company performs an impairment analysis at least annually, rather than amortizing it over a period of time. A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the Company's common stock could require the asset to become impaired. If impaired, the Company would incur a non-cash charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations. The carrying value of goodwill was approximately $85.0 million at December 31, 2021.

The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company's business infrastructure.

Third parties provide key components of the Company's business operations pricing, reputation, compliance, litigationsuch as data processing, recording and cybersecurity.monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access. While the Company assesseshas selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions. Any problem caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cybersecurity breaches, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, could adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver products and improves this programservices to its customers and otherwise conduct its business. Financial or operational difficulties of a third party vendor could also hurt the Company's operations if those difficulties interface with the vendor's ability to serve the Company. Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to the Company's business operations.

LEGAL, REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE RISK

The Company is subject to extensive regulation which could adversely affect its business.

The Company's operations as a publicly traded corporation, a bank holding company, and a parent company to an insured depository institution are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state, and local governmental authorities and are subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing requirements and restrictions on an ongoing basis, therepart or all of the Company's operations. Because the Company's business is highly regulated, the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to it are subject to frequent and sometimes extensive change. Such changes could include higher capital requirements, increased insurance premiums, increased compliance costs, reductions of non-interest income and limitations on services that can be no assuranceprovided. Actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against the Company could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defend itself and may lead to liability or penalties that materially affect the Company and its approach and framework for risk management and related controls will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in its business. If conditions or circumstances arise that expose flaws or gapsshareholders. Any future changes in the Company’s risk-management program,laws, rules or if its controls break down,regulations applicable to the Company’sCompany may negatively affect the Company's business and results of operationsoperations.

Regulatory capital standards may have an adverse effect on the Company's profitability, lending, and ability to pay dividends on the Company's securities.

The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that the Company and the Bank must maintain. From time to time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Company fails to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/or other regulatory requirements, its financial condition maywould be materially and adversely affected.


The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA. Satisfying capital requirements may require the Company to limit its banking operations, retain net income or reduce dividends to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulations issued by the CFPB could adversely impact earnings due to, among other things, increased compliance costs or costs due to noncompliance.

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. For example, the CFPB has issued a final rule requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms, or to originate "qualified mortgages" that meet specific requirements with respect to terms, pricing and fees. The rule also contains additional disclosure requirements at mortgage loan origination and in monthly statements. The requirements under the CFPB's regulations and policies could limit the Company's ability to make certain types of loans or loans to certain borrowers, or could make it more expensive and/or time consuming to make these loans, which could adversely impact the Company's profitability.

Changes in accounting standards could impact reported earnings.

From time to time, with increasing frequency, there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company's financial statements. These changes can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some instances, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements. Refer to Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Current and proposed regulation addressing consumer privacy and data use and security could increase the Company's costs and impact its reputation.

The Company is subject to a number of laws concerning consumer privacy and data use and security, including information safeguard rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. These rules require that financial institutions develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution's size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution's activities, and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue. The United States has experienced a heightened legislative and regulatory focus on privacy and data security, including requiring consumer notification in the event of a data breach. In addition, most states have enacted security breach legislation requiring varying levels of consumer notification in the event of certain types of security breaches. New regulations in these areas may increase the Company's compliance costs, which could negatively impact earnings. In addition, failure to comply with the privacy and data use and security laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including by reason of inadvertent disclosure of confidential information, could result in fines, sanctions, penalties or other adverse consequences and loss of consumer confidence, which could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations, overall business, and reputation.

18

Consumers may increasingly decide not to use the Bank to complete their financial transactions because
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions through alternative methods that historically have involved banks. For example, consumers can now maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts, mutual funds or general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries, known as "disintermediation," could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost of deposits as a source of funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
Negative perception of the Company through media may adversely affect the Company’s reputation and business.
The Company’s reputation is critical to the success of its business. The Company believes that its brand image has been well received by customers, reflecting the fact that the brand image, like the Company’s business, is based in part on trust and confidence. The Company’s reputation and brand image could be negatively affected by rapid and widespread distribution of publicity through social and traditional media channels. The Company’s reputation could also be affected by the Company’s association with clients affected negatively through social and traditional media distribution, or other third parties, or by circumstances outside of the Company’s control. Negative publicity, whether true or untrue, could affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain customers, or cause the Company to incur additional liabilities or costs, or result in additional regulatory scrutiny.

The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.

From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the performance of the Company's fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of the Company and its products and services, as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Changes

Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to environmental, social and governance ("ESG") practices may impose additional costs on the Company or expose it to new or additional risks.

Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to ESG practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to climate risk, hiring practices, the diversity of the work force, and racial and social justice issues. Increased ESG related compliance costs could result in increases to the federal, stateCompany’s overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or local tax laws maycomply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact the Company’s financial performance.

Changes in tax law could increasereputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and the Company’s effective tax rates. Such changes may be retroactive to previous periodsstock price. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and as a resultexpanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure.

STRATEGIC RISK

The Company faces strong competition from financial services companies and other companies that offer banking and other financial services, which could negatively affect the Company’sCompany's business.

The Company encounters substantial competition from other financial institutions in its market area. Ultimately, the Company may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Many competitors offer the same banking services that the Company offers. These competitors include national, regional, and community banks. The Company also faces competition from many other types of financial performance. institutions, including finance companies, mutual and money market fund providers, financial technology ("fintech") companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit unions, financial subsidiaries of certain industrial corporations, and mortgage companies. In particular, competitors include several major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations and ATMs and conduct extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Increased competition may result in reduced business for the Company.

Additionally, banks and other financial institutions with larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the credit needs of larger customers. These institutions also may have differing pricing and underwriting standards, which may adversely affect the Company through the loss of business or causing a misalignment in the Company's risk-return relationship. Areas of competition include interest rates for loans and deposits, efforts to obtain loans and deposits, and range and quality of products and services provided, including new technology-driven products and services. Technological innovation continues to contribute to greater competition in domestic financial services markets as technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services. If the Company is unable to attract and retain banking customers, it may be unable to continue to grow loan and deposit portfolios and its results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The Tax Reform Act,inability of the full impactCompany to successfully manage its growth or implement its growth strategy may adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The Company may not be able to successfully implement its growth strategy if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future. In addition, the ability to manage growth successfully depends on whether the Company can maintain adequate capital levels, cost controls and asset quality, and successfully integrate any businesses acquired into the Company.

As the Company continues to implement its growth strategy by opening new branches or acquiring branches or banks, it expects to incur increased personnel, occupancy and other operating expenses. In the case of new branches, the Company must absorb those higher expenses while it begins to generate new deposits; there is also further time lag involved in redeploying new deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. The Company's plans to expand could depress earnings in the short run, even if it efficiently executes a growth strategy leading to long-term financial benefits.

Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities with the Company's own operations may prevent the Company from achieving the expected benefits from acquisitions.

The Company may not be able to achieve fully the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies expected in an acquisition. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired entity. In addition, the markets and industries in which the Company is still analyzing, is likely to have both positive and negative effects onits potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. The Company may lose customers or the Company’s financial performance. For example, the new legislation will result in a reduction in federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018, which will have a favorable impact on the Company’s earnings and capital generation abilities. However, the new legislation also enacted limitations on certain deductions, such as the deductioncustomers of FDIC deposit insurance premiums, which will partially offset the anticipated increase in net earnings from the lower tax rate. In addition,acquired entities as a result of the lower corporate tax rate,an acquisition; the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional $2.7 million tax expense in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017. The impact of the Tax Reform Act may differlose key personnel, either from the foregoing, possibly materially, due to changes in interpretationsacquired entity or in assumptions thatfrom itself; and the Company has made, guidance or regulationsmay not be able to control the incremental increase in noninterest expense arising from an acquisition in a manner that may be promulgated, and other actions thatimproves its overall operating efficiencies. These factors could contribute to the Company


not achieving the expected benefits from its acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all. Future business acquisitions could be material to the Company and it may take as a resultissue additional shares of the Tax Reform Act. Similarly, the Company’s customers are likelycommon stock to experience varying effects from both the individual and business tax provisions of the Tax Reform Act and such effects, whether positive or negative, may have a corresponding impact on the Company’s business and the economy as a whole.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other external eventspay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders' ownership interests. Acquisitions also could significantly impact the Company’s business.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to conduct business. In addition, such events could affect the stability of the Company’s deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and/or causerequire the Company to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any such event indebt; the futureCompany could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its financial conditiontherefore become more susceptible to economic downturns and results of operations.
Risks Related to the Company's Common Stock
competitive pressures.
 

RISKS RELATING TO OUR SECURITIES

While the Company'sCompanys common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, it has less liquidity than stocks for larger companies quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in the Company'sCompany’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or other stock exchanges. There is no assurance that a more active and liquid trading market for the common stock will exist in the future. Consequently, shareholders may not be able to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which shareholders could sell a smaller number of shares. In addition, wethe Company cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of the Company'sCompany’s common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of the common stock.

Economic and other conditions may cause volatility in the price of the Company’sCompanys common stock.

In the current economic environment, the prices of publicly traded stocks in the financial services sector have been volatile. However, even in a more stable economic environment the price of the Company’s common stock can be affected by a variety of factors such as expected or actual results of operations, changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections, announcements of developments related to its businesses, operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, news or expectations based on the performance of others in the financial services industry, and expected impacts of a changing regulatory environment. These factors not only impact the price of the Company’s common stock but could also affect the liquidity of the stock given the Company’s size, geographical footprint, and industry. The price for shares of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to the Company’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

Future issuances of the Company'sCompanys common stock could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could be dilutive.

The Company is not restricted from issuing additional shares of common stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, shares of common stock. Issuances of a substantial number of shares of common stock, or the expectation that such issuances might occur, including in connection with acquisitions by the Company, could materially adversely affect the market price of the shares of the common stock and could be dilutive to shareholders. Because the Company'sCompany’s decision to issue common stock in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors, it cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of possible future issuances of its common stock. Accordingly, the Company'sCompany’s shareholders bear the risk that future issuances will reduce the market price of the common stock and dilute their stock holdings in the Company.

The primary source of the Company'sCompanys income from which it pays cash dividends is the receipt of dividends from its subsidiary bank.

The availability of dividends from the Company is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the OCC could assert that payment of dividends or other payments is an unsafe or unsound practice. In the event the Bank was unable to pay dividends to the Company, or be limited in the payment of such dividends, the Company would likely have to reduce or stop paying common stock dividends. The Company'sCompany’s reduction, limitationlimitation. or failure to pay such dividends on its common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the common stock.


The Company'sCompanys governing documents and Virginia law contain anti-takeover provisions that could negatively impact its shareholders.

The Company'sCompany’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws and the Virginia Stock Corporation Act contain certain provisions designed to enhance the ability of the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors to deal with attempts to acquire control of the Company. These provisions and the ability to set the voting rights, preferences and other terms of any series of preferred stock that may be issued, may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may discourage takeovers (which certain shareholders may deem to be in their best interest). To the extent that such takeover attempts are discouraged, temporary fluctuations in the market price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock resulting from actual or rumored takeover attempts may be inhibited. These provisions also could discourage or make more difficult a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest, even though such transactions may be favorable to the interests of shareholders, and could potentially adversely affect the market price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock.

GENERAL RISK

The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect the Company and the adverse impacts on its business, financial position, and operations could be significant.  The ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created global economic disruptions and disruptions to the lives of people around the world.  Governments, businesses, and the public have taken and continue to take actions to contain the spread of COVID-19 and to mitigate its effects, including quarantines, travel bans, shelter-in-place orders, closures of businesses and schools, fiscal stimulus, and legislation designed to deliver monetary aid and other relief.  While the scope, duration, and full effects continue to evolve, change and are not fully known, the pandemic and related efforts to contain it have disrupted global economic activity, adversely affected the functioning of financial markets, impacted interest rates, increased economic and market uncertainty, and disrupted trade and supply chains.  If these effects continue for a prolonged time period or result in sustained economic stress or recession, such effects could have a material adverse impact on the Company in terms of credit quality, collateral values, ability of customers to repay loans, product demand, funding, operations, interest rate risk and human capital.

In March 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 was recognized as a global pandemic. The spread of the virus has created a global health crisis that has resulted in unprecedented uncertainty, volatility and disruption in financial markets and in governmental, commercial and consumer activity in the United States and globally.  Governmental efforts in response to the outbreak in 2020 and 2021 have affected business operations and consumer activity.  The Company responded during the periods with measures to ensure employee and customer safety, maintain customer service levels, and continue operations while complying with applicable laws and regulations. Mid-2020, the Company implemented a business continuity plan and protocols to continue to maintain a high level of care for its employees, customers and communities. The Company also transitioned a majority of its non-branch employees to working remotely and assisting customers by appointment only in branches or directing them to drive-thrus or ATMs. It cancelled all business travel, and has held all Company meetings through virtual platforms. In the fall of 2021, branches were re-opened with safety protocols in place but were from time to time reverted back to appointment only or drive-thru only as Covid-19 circulated. The Company continues to maintain remote work options for a portion of its employees, continues to limit non-essential business travel and continuesto hold meetings virtually. There is no guarantee these actions will be sufficient to successfully mitigate the risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and additional actions may be required.  Future actions deemed necessary by local, state or national leaders could hinder its ability to operate going forward.  Its business operations may be disrupted if key personnel or significant portions of the Company's employees are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, or other restrictions in connection with the pandemic.  The Company's ability to serve its customers could be impacted if actions taken by vendors or business partners are unable to continue providing services the Company depends on.

COVID-19 continues to be a threat to the world.  The extent, severity and duration of the current and future actions are unprecedented and, until normal economic conditions resume, the Company is unable to accurately predict or measure the effects.  For this reason, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects its business, operations and financial conditions, as well as its regulatory capital and liquidity ratios is highly uncertain and unpredictable and depends on, among other things, new information that may emerge from the actions discussed above to combat the threats posed by the virus. If the pandemic is prolonged, the adverse impact on the markets served and on the Company's business, operations and financial condition could deepen.

Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect the Company's business.

The Company's business is directly impacted by economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond the Company's control. A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national or local events (including the COVID-19 pandemic, rising wages in a tight labor market, geopolitical instability and supply chain complications), especially within the Company's market area, could result in potentially negative material consequences such as the following, among others: loan delinquencies increasing; problem assets and foreclosures increasing; demand for products and services decreasing; low cost or noninterest bearing deposits decreasing; and collateral for loans, especially real estate, declining in value, in turn reducing customers' borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans. Each of these consequences may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Wealth management income is a major source of non-interest income for the Company. Trust and brokerage fee revenue is largely dependent on the fair market value of assets under management and on trading volumes in the brokerage business. General economic conditions and their subsequent effect on the securities markets tend to act in correlation. When general economic conditions deteriorate, securities markets generally decline in value, and the Company's trust and brokerage fee revenue is negatively impacted as asset values and trading volumes decrease.

The Company's exposure to operational, technological and organizational risk may adversely affect the Company.

The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputation, legal, and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees or operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or telecommunications systems.

Negative public opinion can result from the actual or alleged conduct in any number of activities, including lending practices, corporate governance, and acquisitions, and from actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can adversely affect the Company's ability to attract and retain customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

Certain errors may be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and successfully rectified. The Company's necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transactions may further increase the risk that technical system flaws or employee tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages), which may give rise to disruption of service to customers and to financial loss or liability. The Company is further exposed to the risk that its external vendors may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors by their respective employees as is the Company) and to the risk that the Company's (or its vendors') business continuity and data security systems prove to be inadequate.

The Company's risk-management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

The Company maintains an enterprise risk management program that is designed to identify, quantify, monitor, report, and control the risks that it faces. These risks include, but are not limited to: strategic, interest-rate, credit, liquidity, operations, pricing, reputation, compliance, litigation and cybersecurity. While the Company assesses and improves this program on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that its approach and framework for risk management and related controls will effectively mitigate all risk and limit losses in its business. If conditions or circumstances arise that expose flaws or gaps in the Company's risk-management program, or if its controls break down, the Company's results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Negative perception of the Company through media may adversely affect the Company's reputation and business.

The Company's reputation is critical to the success of its business. The Company believes that its brand image has been well received by customers, reflecting the fact that the brand image, like the Company’s business, is based in part on trust and confidence. The Company’s reputation and brand image could be negatively affected by rapid and widespread distribution of publicity through social and traditional media channels. The Company’s reputation could also be affected by the Company’s association with clients affected negatively through social and traditional media distribution, or other third parties, or by circumstances outside of the Company’s control. Negative publicity, whether deserved or undeserved, could affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain customers, or cause the Company to incur additional liabilities or costs, or result in additional regulatory scrutiny.

Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may result in operational changes and expenditures that could significantly impact the Companys business.

The current and anticipated effects of climate change are creating an increasing level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies have continued to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. The federal banking agencies, including the OCC, have emphasized that climate-related risks are faced by banking organizations of all types and sizes and are in the process of enhancing supervisory expectations regarding banks’ risk management practices. In December 2021, the OCC published proposed principles for climate risk management by banking organizations with more than $100 billion in assets. The OCC also has appointed its first ever Climate Change Risk Officer and established an internal climate risk implementation committee in order to assist with these initiatives and to support the agency’s efforts to enhance its supervision of climate change risk management. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. To the extent that these initiatives lead to the promulgation of new regulations or supervisory guidance applicable to the Company, the Company would likely experience increased compliance costs and other compliance-related risks.

The lack of empirical data surrounding the credit and other financial risks posed by climate change render it impossible to predict how specifically climate change may impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations; however, the physical effects of climate change may also directly impact the Company. Specifically, unpredictable and more frequent weather disasters may adversely impact the value of real property securing the loans in the Bank’s loan portfolio. Additionally, if insurance obtained by borrowers is insufficient to cover any losses sustained to the collateral, or if insurance coverage is otherwise unavailable to borrowers, the collateral securing loans may be negatively impacted by climate change, which could impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Further, the effects of climate change may negatively impact regional and local economic activity, which could lead to an adverse effect on customers and impact the communities in which the Company operates. Overall, climate change, its effects and the resulting, unknown impact could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, geopolitical instability, public health issues, and other external events could significantly impact the Company's business.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, geopolitical instability, public health issues, and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on the Company's ability to conduct business. In addition, such events could affect the stability of the Company's deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue, and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any such event in the future could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company maintained twenty-six26 banking offices. The Company's Virginia banking offices are located in the cities of Danville, Lynchburg, Martinsville, Lynchburg,Roanoke, and Salem and in the counties of Bedford, Campbell, Franklin, Halifax, Henry, Montgomery, Pittsylvania and Roanoke. In North Carolina, the Company's banking offices are located in the cities of Burlington, Graham, Greensboro, Mebane, andRaleigh, Winston-Salem, and inYanceyville, which are within the counties of Alamance, Caswell, Forsyth, Guilford, and Guilford.Wake. The Company also operates twoone loan production offices.

office.

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 628 Main Street in the business district of Danville, Virginia. This building, owned by the Company, has three floors totaling approximately 27,000 square feet.

The Company owns a building located at 103 Tower Drive in Danville, Virginia. This three-story facility serves as an operations center.

The Company has an office at 445 Mount Cross Road in Danville, Virginia, where it consolidated two banking offices in January 2009 and gained additional administrative space.

The Company hasleases certain space located at 202 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia as a result of the merger with HomeTown. This office serves as the Virginia banking headquarters and the center for its corporate credit function.

The Company leases an office at 3101 South Church Street703 Green Valley Road in Burlington,Greensboro, North Carolina. This building serves as the head office for the Company's North Carolina operations.

The Company has an office at 3000 Ogden Road in Roanoke, Virginia. The building is approximately 14,000 square feet and serves as the Company's main office in the Roanoke market.
banking headquarters.

The Company owns fifteen20 other offices for a total of nineteen23 owned buildings. There are no mortgages or liens against any of the properties owned by the Company. The Company operates thirty-four37 ATMs on owned or leased facilities. The Company leases five other offices for a total of seven leased office locations and twoleases one storage warehouses.  The Company occupies space rent-free for its limited service office inwarehouse. Management believes that upon expiration of each of the Village of Brookwood Retirement Center under an agreement withCompany's leases it will be able to extend the owners of that facility.

lease on satisfactory terms or relocate to another acceptable location.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of operations, the Company and the Bank are parties to various legal proceedings. Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

23

None.

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market and Dividend Information

The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "AMNB." At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had 3,2134,104 shareholders of record. 

The following table presentsCompany paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.27 per share for each of the highfirst three quarters of 2021 and low sales prices$0.28 per share for the Company's common stock and dividends declared for the past two years.

  Sales Price 
Dividends
Declared
2017 High Low Per Share
       
1st quarter $39.40
 $33.80
 $0.24
2nd quarter 42.50
 34.60
 0.24
3rd quarter 41.95
 35.05
 0.24
4th quarter 43.00
 36.65
 0.25
   
  
 $0.97
       
  Sales Price 
Dividends
Declared
2016 High Low Per Share
       
1st quarter $26.00
 $22.29
 $0.24
2nd quarter 27.69
 24.36
 0.24
3rd quarter 28.50
 24.87
 0.24
4th quarter 36.25
 26.41
 0.24
   
  
 $0.96
fourth quarter of 2021. The Company’sCompany's future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the Boards of Directors of the Company and the Bank and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and general business conditions. The Company and the Bank are also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the reserve and capital requirements of federal and state statutes and regulations. See “Part"Part I, Item 1. Business - Supervision and Regulation - Dividends," for information on regulatory restrictions on dividends.

Stock Compensation Plans

Until its expiration date on February 18,

The Company's 2018 the Company maintained the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan ("2008 Plan"), which was designed to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide employees with an equity interest inadopted by the Company as an incentive to contribute to the successBoard of Directors of the Company on February 20, 2018 and reward employees for outstanding performance andapproved by shareholders on May 15, 2018 at the attainmentCompany's 2018 Annual Meeting of targeted goals.Shareholders. The 2008 Planplan and stock compensation in general isare discussed in Note 1213 of the ConsolidatedConsolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


The following table summarizes information, as of December 31, 2017,2021, relating to the Company's equity based compensation plans, pursuant to which grants of options to acquire shares of common stock have been and may be granted from time to time.

 December 31, 2017
 Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options Weighted-Average Per Share Exercise Price of Outstanding Options 
Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Stock Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders50,985
 $24.09
 95,498
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
 
 
Total50,985
 $24.09
 95,498

  

December 31, 2021

 
  Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Weighted-Average Per Share Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

  4,863  $16.63   525,811 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

         

Total

  4,863  $16.63   525,811 

Stock Repurchase Program

On November 19, 2015,January 12, 2021, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of Directors (the "Board") of a stock repurchase program. The program that authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000350,000 shares of the Company's common shares over a two year period. The share purchase limit was equal to approximately 3.5%stock through December 31, 2021. Shares of the 8,622,000Company's common shares then outstanding atstock were repurchased during the time the Board approved the program. The program expired on November 19, 2017.three months ended December 31, 2021, as detailed below.
During 2017, the Company did not repurchase any shares.

Period Beginning on First Day of Month Ended

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

Average Price Paid Per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

 

Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs

         

October 31, 2021

 

 

$ —

 

 

102,001

November 30, 2021

 

5,656

 

37.24

 

5,656

 

96,345

December 31, 2021

 

12,284

 

37.09

 

12,284

 

Total

 

17,940

 

$ 37.14

 

17,940

  
In 2016,2021, the Company repurchased 51,384 shares265,939 at an average cost of $25.14$33.08 per share for a total cost of $1,292,000.$8,810,000. 
On January 19, 2018,20, 2022, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of anotherDirectors of a stock repurchase program. The program that authorizes the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares$13 million of the Company's common stock over a two year period.through December 31, 2022.  

Comparative Stock Performance

The following graph compares the Company's cumulative total return to its shareholders with the returns of two indexes for the five-year period ended December 31, 2017.2021. The cumulative total return was calculated taking into consideration changes in stock price, cash dividends, stock dividends, and stock splits since December 31, 2012.2016. The indexes are the Nasdaq Composite Index;Index and the SNL Bank $1 Billion - $5 Billion Index, which includes bank holding companies with assets of $1 billion to $5 billion and is published by SNL Financial, LC.

picture21.jpg
American National Bankshares Inc.
 Period Ending
Index12/31/12
 12/31/13
 12/31/14
 12/31/15
 12/31/16
 12/31/17
American National Bankshares Inc.$100.00
 $135.48
 $133.35
 $143.19
 $201.42
 $227.54
Nasdaq Composite100.00
 140.12
 160.78
 171.97
 187.22
 242.71
SNL Bank $1B-$5B100.00
 145.41
 152.04
 170.20
 244.85
 261.04

  

Period Ending

 

Index

 

12/31/2016

  

12/31/2017

  

12/31/2018

  

12/31/2019

  

12/31/2020

  

12/31/2021

 

American National Bankshares Inc.

 $100.00  $112.95  $88.77  $123.44  $85.15  $126.32 

Nasdaq Composite

  100.00   129.64   125.96   172.18   249.51   304.85 

SNL Bank $1B-$5B

  100.00   104.33   87.06   109.22   99.19   138.09 


ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the Company for the last five years:
RESERVED

25

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share information and ratios)
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Results of Operations:         
Interest income$63,038
 $56,170
 $55,169
 $47,455
 $52,956
Interest expense7,291
 6,316
 5,904
 5,730
 6,583
Net interest income55,747
 49,854
 49,265
 41,725
 46,373
Provision for loan losses1,016
 250
 950
 400
 294
Noninterest income14,227
 13,505
 13,287
 11,176
 10,827
Noninterest expense42,883
 39,801
 40,543
 34,558
 35,105
Income before income tax provision26,075
 23,308
 21,059
 17,943
 21,801
Income tax provision10,826
 7,007
 6,020
 5,202
 6,054
Net income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
 $12,741
 $15,747
          
Financial Condition: 
  
  
  
  
Assets$1,816,078
 $1,678,638
 $1,547,599
 $1,346,492
 $1,307,512
Loans, net of unearned income1,336,125
 1,164,821
 1,005,525
 840,925
 794,671
Securities327,447
 352,726
 345,661
 349,250
 351,013
Deposits1,534,726
 1,370,640
 1,262,660
 1,075,837
 1,057,675
Shareholders' equity208,717
 201,380
 197,835
 173,780
 167,551
Shareholders' equity, tangible163,654
 155,789
 151,280
 132,692
 125,349
          
Per Share Information: 
  
  
  
  
Earnings per share, basic$1.76
 $1.89
 $1.73
 $1.62
 $2.00
Earnings per share, diluted1.76
 1.89
 1.73
 1.62
 2.00
Cash dividends paid0.97
 0.96
 0.93
 0.92
 0.92
Book value24.13
 23.37
 22.95
 22.07
 21.23
Book value, tangible18.92
 18.08
 17.55
 16.86
 15.89
          
Average common shares outstanding - basic8,641,717
 8,611,507
 8,680,502
 7,867,198
 7,872,870
Average common shares outstanding - diluted8,660,628
 8,621,241
 8,688,450
 7,877,576
 7,884,561
          
Selected Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Return on average assets0.87% 1.02% 0.99% 0.97% 1.20 %
Return on average equity (1)7.34% 8.07% 7.65% 7.40% 9.52 %
Return on average tangible equity (2)9.59% 10.85% 10.62% 10.31% 13.75 %
Dividend payout ratio54.98% 50.71% 53.65% 56.80% 46.03 %
Efficiency ratio (3)60.89% 61.47% 63.81% 63.41% 57.57 %
Net interest margin3.50% 3.52% 3.69% 3.66% 4.10 %
          
Asset Quality Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Allowance for loan losses to period end loans1.02% 1.10% 1.25% 1.48% 1.59 %
Allowance for loan losses to period end non-performing loans531.37% 360.39% 242.09% 302.21% 248.47 %
Non-performing assets to total assets0.21% 0.29% 0.48% 0.46% 0.65 %
Net charge-offs to average loans0.02% 0.00% 0.08% 0.07% (0.02)%
          
Capital Ratios: 
  
  
  
  
Total risk-based capital ratio14.39% 14.81% 16.34% 17.86% 18.14 %
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio11.50% 11.77% 12.88% n/a
 n/a
Tier 1 capital ratio13.42% 13.83% 15.23% 16.59% 16.88 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio10.95% 11.67% 12.05% 12.16% 11.81 %
Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio (4)9.24% 9.54% 10.08% 10.00% 9.91 %


(1)Return on average common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.
(2)Return on average tangible common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders plus amortization of intangibles tax effected by average common equity less average intangibles.
(3)The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense excluding gains or losses on the sale of other real estate owned by net interest income including tax equivalent income on nontaxable loans and securities and noninterest income and excluding (a) gains or losses on securities and (b) gains or losses on sale of premises and equipment.
(4)Tangible equity to tangible assets ratio is calculated by dividing period-end common equity less period-end intangibles by period-end assets less period-end intangibles.

ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The main purpose of this discussion is to focus on significant changes in the financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the past three years. The discussion and analysis are intended to supplement and highlight information contained in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECLASSIFICATION

In certain circumstances, reclassifications have been made to prior period information to conform to the 20172021 presentation. There were no material reclassifications.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform with GAAP and they conform to general practices within the banking industry. The Company's critical accounting policies, which are summarized below, relate to (1) the allowance for loan losses, (2) mergers and acquisitions, (3) acquired loans with specific credit-related deterioration, (4) goodwill and intangible assets, (5) other real estate owned, (6) deferred tax assets and liabilities, (7)and (6) other-than-temporary impairment of securities and (8) the unfunded pension liability.securities. A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The financial information contained within the Company's financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset, or relieving a liability. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the allowance for loan losses ("ALLL") is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.

The goal of the Company is to maintain an appropriate, systematic, and consistently applied process to determine the amounts of the ALLL and the provision for loan loss expense.

The Company uses certain practices to manage its credit risk. These practices include (1) appropriate lending limits for loan officers, (2) a loan approval process, (3) careful underwriting of loan requests, including analysis of borrowers, cash flows, collateral, and market risks, (4) regular monitoring of the portfolio, including diversification by type and geography, (5) review of loans by the Loan Review department, which operates independently of loan production (the Loan Review function consists of a co-sourced arrangement using both internal personnel and external vendors to provide the Company with a more robust review function of the loan portfolio), (6) regular meetings of the Credit Committee to discuss portfolio and policy changes and make decisions on large or unusual loan requests, and (7) regular meetings of the Asset Quality Committee which reviews the status of individual loans.

Risk grades are assigned as part of the loan origination process. From time to time, risk grades may be modified as warranted by the facts and circumstances surrounding the credit.

Calculation and analysis of the ALLL is prepared quarterly by the Finance Department with input from the Credit Department. The Company's Credit Committee, Capital ManagementRisk and Compliance Committee, Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors review the allowance for adequacy.


The Company's ALLL has two basic components: the formula allowance and the specific allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates and judgments.

The formula allowance uses historical loss experience as an indicator of future losses, along with various qualitative factors, including levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in underwriting standards, experience of lending staff, economic conditions, and portfolio concentrations, regulatory, legal, competition, quality of loan review system, and value of underlying collateral. In the formula allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans, the historical loss rate is combined with the qualitative factors, resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each risk-grade category of loans. The period-end balances for each loan risk-grade category are multiplied by the adjusted loss factor. Allowance calculations for residential real estate and consumer loans are calculated based on historical losses for each product category without regard to risk grade. This loss rate is combined with qualitative factors resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each product category.

The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss for specifically identified impaired loans. These include:

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate.  The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);
The loan's observable market price, or
The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);

The loan's observable market price; or

The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The use of these computed values is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates.

No single statistic, formula, or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance. Management makes subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. For analytical purposes, management allocates a portion of the allowance to specific loan categories and specific loans. However, the entire allowance is used to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including identified and unidentified losses.

The relationships and ratios used in calculating the allowance, including the qualitative factors, may change from period to period as facts and circumstances evolve. Furthermore, management cannot provide assurance that in any particular period the Bank will not have sizeablesizable credit losses in relation to the amount reserved. Management may find it necessary to significantly adjust the allowance, considering current factors at the time.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB"("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805, Business Combinations, using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values as of that date. To determine the fair values, the Company will rely on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation techniques. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company will identify the acquirer and the closing date and apply applicable recognition principles and conditions.

Acquisition-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Some other examples of costs to the Company include systems conversions, integration planning, consultants, and advertising costs. The Company will account for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities will be recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP. These acquisition-related costs have been and will be included within the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Incomeincome classified within the noninterest expense caption.

Acquired Loans with Specific Credit-Related Deterioration

Acquired loans with specific credit deterioration are accounted for by the Company in accordance with FASB ASC 310-30, Receivables - Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Certain acquired loans, those for which specific credit-related deterioration since origination is identified, are recorded at fair value reflecting the present valueamount paid, such that there is no carryover of the amounts expected to be collected.seller's allowance for loan losses. Income recognition on these loans is based on a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows to be collected. Acquired loans deemed impaired and considered collateral dependent, with the timing of the sale of loan collateral indeterminate, remain on non-accrual status and have no accretable yield.


Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company follows ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after January 1, 2009 is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events and circumstances existsexist that indicate that a goodwill impairment test should be performed. The Company has selectedrecords as goodwill the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Impairment testing is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. The Company performs its annual analysis on June 30 asof each fiscal year. No indicators of impairment were noted for the date to perform the annual impairment test.years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 or 2019. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortizedamortizing over their estimated useful lives which range from 8.25of 5 to 10 years, to their estimated residual values.years. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets. No indicators

27

Other Real Estate Owned
Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations of the foreclosed assets based on updated appraisals, general market conditions, recent sales of similar properties, length of time the properties have been held, and our ability and intention with regard to continued ownership of the properties. The Company may incur additional write-downs of foreclosed assets to fair value less costs to sell if valuations indicate a further deterioration in market conditions.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

The realization of deferred income tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is “more"more likely than not”not" that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. “More"More likely than not”not" is defined as greater than a 50% chance. Management considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed.

Other-than-temporary Impairment of Securities

Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. For debt securities, impairment is considered other-than-temporary and recognized in its entirety in net income if either (i) we intend(1) the Company intends to sell the security or (ii)(2) it is more-likely-than-not that wethe Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however, we dothe Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that weit will be required to sell the security before recovery, wethe Company must determine what portion of the impairment is attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is no credit loss, there is no other-than-temporary impairment. If there is a credit loss, other-than-temporary impairment exists, and the credit loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be recognized in other comprehensive income. For equity securities, impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary based on our ability and intent to hold the investment until a recovery of fair value. Other-than-temporary impairment of an equity security results in a write-down that must be included in net income. We regularly review each investment security for other-than-temporary impairment based on criteria that includes the extent to which cost exceeds market price, the duration of that market decline, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer, our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from debt securities, our intention with regard to holding the security to maturity and the likelihood that we would be required to sell the security before recovery.

Unfunded Pension Liability
The Company previously maintained a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan for eligible full-time employees as specified by the plan. The Company froze its pension plan to new participants and converted its pension plan to a cash balance plan effective December 31, 2009. Plan assets, which consist primarily of mutual funds invested in marketable equity securities and corporate and government fixed income securities, are valued using market quotations. The Company’s actuary determines plan obligations and annual pension expense using a number of key assumptions. Key assumptions may include the discount rate, the interest crediting rate, the estimated future return on plan assets and the anticipated rate of future salary increases. Changes in these assumptions in the future, if any, or in the method under which benefits are calculated may impact pension assets, liabilities or expense.

NON-GAAP PRESENTATIONS

Non-GAAP presentations are provided because the Company believes these may be valuable to investors. These include (1) the calculation of the efficiency ratio, and (2) the analysis of net interest income presented on a taxable equivalent basis to facilitate performance comparisons among various taxable and tax-exempt assets.

assets, (3) return on average tangible common equity, (4) tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio, and (5) tangible book value per share.

The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense excluding (1) gains or losses on the sale of other real estate owned ("OREO"), (2) core deposit intangible amortization and (3) merger related expense by net interest income including tax equivalent income on nontaxable loans and securities and noninterest income and excluding (i)(x) gains or losses on securities and (ii)(y) gains or losses on sale or disposal of premises and equipment. The efficiency ratio for 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 20152019 was 60.89%51.05%, 61.47%52.80%, and 63.81%57.25%, respectively. The Company expects continued improvement in this ratio to increase in 2018. This2022 as the benefits of PPP related items decrease. The efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company believes provides investors with important information regarding operational efficiency. Such information is not prepared in accordance with GAAP and should not be construed as such. Management believes, however, such financial information is meaningful to the reader in understanding operating performance but cautions that such information not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP.GAAP information. In addition, the Company's non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures of other companies. The Company, in referring to its net income, is referring to income under GAAP. The components of the efficiency ratio calculation are summarized in the following table (dollars in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Efficiency Ratio

            

Noninterest expense

 $59,008  $54,565  $66,074 

Add/subtract: gain/loss on sale OREO, net of writedowns

  (111)  4   52 

Subtract: core deposit intangible amortization

  (1,464)  (1,637)  (1,398)

Subtract: merger related expenses

        (11,782)
  $57,433  $52,932  $52,946 
             

Net interest income

 $90,391  $83,820  $77,127 

Tax equivalent adjustment

  241   288   369 

Noninterest income

  21,031   16,843   15,170 

Subtract: gain on securities

  (35)  (814)  (607)

Add/subtract: loss/gain on sale of fixed assets

  885   110   427 
  $112,513  $100,247  $92,486 
             

Efficiency ratio

  51.05%  52.80%  57.25%

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Efficiency Ratio     
Noninterest expense$42,883
 $39,801
 $40,543
Add/Subtract: loss/(gain) on sale OREO(164) (228) 99
 $42,719
 $39,573
 $40,642
      
Net interest income$55,747
 $49,854
 $49,265
Tax equivalent adjustment1,339
 1,846
 2,014
Noninterest income14,227
 13,505
 13,287
Subtract: gain on securities(812) (836) (867)
Add/Subtract: (gain)/loss on sale of fixed assets(344) 9
 (11)
 $70,157
 $64,378
 $63,688
      
Efficiency ratio60.89% 61.47% 63.81%
28

Net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by total average earning assets. Because a portion of interest income earned by the Company is nontaxable, the tax equivalent net interest income is considered in the calculation of this ratio. Tax equivalent net interest income is calculated by adding the tax benefit realized from interest income that is nontaxable to total interest income then subtracting total interest expense. The tax rate utilized in calculating the tax benefit is 21% for 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015 is 35%.2019. The reconciliation of tax equivalent net interest income, which is not a measurement under GAAP, to net interest income, is reflected in the table below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Reconciliation of Net Interest Income to Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income     
Non-GAAP measures:     
Interest income - loans$55,581
 $48,224
 $46,985
Interest income - investments and other8,796
 9,792
 10,198
Interest expense - deposits(5,794) (5,103) (4,811)
Interest expense - customer repurchase agreements(142) (5) (9)
Interest expense - other short-term borrowings(31) (5) 
Interest expense - long-term borrowings(1,324) (1,203) (1,084)
Total net interest income$57,086
 $51,700
 $51,279
Less non-GAAP measures:     
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - loans$(305) $(253) $(125)
Tax benefit realized on non-taxable interest income - municipal securities(1,034) (1,593) (1,889)
GAAP measures$55,747
 $49,854
 $49,265
STRATEGIC EVENT

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Reconciliation of Net Interest Income to Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income

            

Non-GAAP measures:

            

Interest income - loans

 $87,181  $87,881  $82,869 

Interest income - investments and other

  8,856   8,247   10,355 

Interest expense - deposits

  (3,645)  (9,729)  (13,143)

Interest expense - customer repurchase agreements

  (22)  (259)  (596)

Interest expense - other short-term borrowings

        (54)

Interest expense - long-term borrowings

  (1,738)  (2,032)  (1,935)

Total net interest income

 $90,632  $84,108  $77,496 

Less non-GAAP measures:

            

Tax benefit realized on nontaxable interest income - loans

  (141)  (181)  (185)

Tax benefit realized on nontaxable interest income - municipal securities

  (100)  (107)  (184)

GAAP measures net interest income

 $90,391  $83,820  $77,127 

Return on average tangible common equity is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Return on Average Tangible Common Equity

            

Return on average common equity (GAAP basis)

  12.50%  9.12%  7.16%

Impact of excluding average goodwill and other intangibles

  4.84%  4.07%  3.27%

Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  17.34%  13.19%  10.43%

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio is calculated by dividing period-end common equity less period-end intangibles by period-end assets less period-end intangibles.

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets

        

Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP basis)

  10.64%  11.08%

Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles

  (2.47)%  (2.74)%

Tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP)

  8.17%  8.34%

The Company presents book value per share (period-end shareholders' equity divided by period-end common shares outstanding) and tangible book value per share. In the fall of 2016,calculating tangible book value, the Company announced the openingexcludes goodwill and other intangible assets.

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Tangible Book Value Per Share

        

Book value per share (GAAP basis)

 $32.95  $30.77 

Impact of excluding goodwill and other intangibles

  (8.33)  (8.30)

Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)

 $24.62  $22.47 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Overview

The Company's 2021 financial highlights include the following:

Earnings produced a return on average tangible common equity of 17.34% for 2021, compared to 13.19% for 2020.*

Average interest-bearing deposits grew 16.8% in 2021 over 2020.

Net interest margin was 3.05% for 2021, down from 3.30% for 2020.*   

Noninterest revenues increased $4.2 million, or 24.9%, when compared to the previous year.

Noninterest expense increased $4.4 million, or 8.1%, when compared to 2020.

The 2021 negative provision (recovery) for loan losses totaled $2.8 million, which compares to a provision of $8.9 million in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans held for investment decreased to 0.96% at year-end 2021, compared to 1.06% at year-end 2020.

Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets were 0.07% at December 31, 2021, down from 0.12% at December 31, 2020.

Net recoveries to total loans were (0.01%) for 2021, compared to net charge-offs to total loans of 0.03% for 2020.

*Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section within this section for further information on these non-GAAP financial measurements.

Net Income

Net income for 20172021 was $15,249,000$43,526,000 compared to $16,301,000$30,045,000 for 2016, a decrease2020, an increase of $1,052,000$13,481,000, or 6.5%44.9%. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $1.76$4.00 for 20172021 compared to $1.89$2.74 for 2016.2020. Diluted earnings per share were $4.00 for 2021 compared to $2.73 for 2020. This net income produced for 20172021 a return on average assets of 0.87%1.37%, a return on average common equity of 7.34%12.50%, and a return on average tangible common equity of 9.59%17.34%.

Although the corporate tax rate reduction from 35% to 21% enacted into law by the Tax Reform Act becomes effective in 2018, the enactment required companies to revalue their deferred tax assets at the new tax rate in 2017. Accordingly, in December 2017 the Company recognized a $2.7 million charge ($0.31 per share) to its deferred tax asset and a corresponding increase in income tax expense. Without the impact of the one-time deferred tax write-down, net

Net income for 2017 would have been $17.9 million,2020 was $30,045,000 compared to $20,906,000 for 2019, an increase of $1.6 million compared to 2016. Basic and diluted earnings per share would have been $2.07.

Net income for 2016 was $16,301,000 compared to $15,039,000 for 2015, an increase of $1,262,000$9,139,000, or 8.4%43.7%. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $1.89$2.74 for 20162020 compared to $1.73$1.99 for 2015.2019. Diluted earnings per share were $2.73 for 2020 compared to $1.98 for 2019. This net income produced for 20162020 a return on average assets of 1.02%1.08%, a return on average common equity of 8.07%9.12%, and a return on average tangible common equity of 10.85%13.19%.
Earnings for 2017, 2016,

The increase in earnings in 2021 was primarily the result of the recovery of provision of $2,825,000 in 2021 compared to the $8,916,000 provision expense in 2020, reduced costs of deposits year over year and 2015 were favorably impacted byan additional $2,000,000 of PPP net fees recognized in 2021 over 2020. The increase in earnings in 2020 was primarily related to the 2011 acquisitionApril 1, 2019 merger with HomeTown as the Company realized a full year of MidCarolina Financial Corporation ("MidCarolina")operations from the combined entities and the 2015 acquisition2019 earnings were impacted adversely by $11,782,000 in one-time merger expenses.

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities, primarily deposits.deposits and borrowings. Fluctuations in interest rates as well as volume and mix changes in earning assets and interest bearing liabilities can materially impact net interest income. The 2011Mergers, including the most recent 2019 acquisition of MidCarolina


and the 2015 acquisition of MainStreetHomeTown, impacted net interest income positively for 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019 through increased earning assets.

The following discussion of net interest income is presented on a taxable equivalent basis to facilitate performance comparisons among various taxable and tax-exempt assets, such as certain state and municipal securities. A tax rate of 35%21% was used in adjusting interest on tax-exempt assets to a fully taxable equivalent basis.basis for 2021, 2020, and 2019. Net interest income divided by average earning assets is referred to as the net interest margin. The net interest spread represents the difference between the average rate earned on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. All references in this section relate to average yields and rates and average asset and liability balances during the periods discussed.

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increased $5,386,000$6,524,000, or 10.4%7.8%, in 20172021 from 2016,2020, following a $421,000$6,612,000, or 0.8%8.5%, increase in 20162020 from 2015.2019. The increase in net interest income in 20172021 was primarily duethe result of reduced deposit costs from 2020 and additional net PPP fee income in 2021. Average interest bearing deposit balances for 2021 were up $201,691,000, or 12.6%, over 2020, but rates were down 41 basis points, significantly reducing the costs to increased volumes of earning assets related to organic growth.

carry the liabilities.

Yields on loans were 4.39%4.44% in 20172021 compared to 4.54%4.36% in 2016.2020. Cost of funds was 0.64%0.29% in 20172021 compared to 0.60%0.72% in 2016.2020. Between 20172021 and 2016,2020, deposit rates for demand accounts decreased to 0.02%0.03% from 0.05%0.09%, money market accounts increaseddecreased to 0.50%0.11% from 0.18%0.46%, and time deposits decreased to 1.05%0.74% from 1.14%1.52%. The increase in money market rates was related mainly to high dollar volume commercial and municipal customer accounts. Management regularly reviews deposit pricing and attempts to keep costs as low as possible, while remaining competitive. The net interest margin was 3.50%3.05% for 2017, 3.52%2021, compared to 3.30% for 2016, and 3.69% for 2015.

During 2008, the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of the FRB reduced the federal funds rate seven times from 4.25% to 0.25%, where it remained, unchanged, through mid December 2015. On December 17, 2015,2020. The decrease in net interest margin was driven by declining interest rates.

In March 2020, the FOMC, raisedin response to the target federal funds rate from 0.25% to 0.50%. On December 15, 2016, the FOMC raised the target federal funds rate from 0.50% to 0.75%. The FOMC raisedCOVID-19 crisis, reduced the target federal funds rate by 0.25% on March 15, June 14, and December 13, 2017, ending the year at 1.50%. The increase in rates is expected to have a nominal positive impact on net interest income. Given recent economic and geopolitical events in 2017 and early 2018, taking the federal funds target rate may be higher at year end 2018, but there is uncertainty and the Company cannot predict asdown to how much higher0.25% where it may be.

has remained.

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increased $421,000$6,612,000, or 0.8%8.5%, in 20162020 from 2015, following a $7,466,000 or 17.0% increase in 2015 from 2014. The increase in net interest income in 2016 was primarily due to increased volumes of earning assets related to organic growth.

Yields on loans were 4.54% in 2016 compared to 4.81% in 2015. Cost of funds was 0.60% in 2016 compared to 0.58% in 2015. Between 2016 and 2015, deposit rates for demand accounts increased to 0.05% from 0.04%, money market accounts increased to 0.18% from 0.13%, and time deposits increased to 1.14% from 1.09%. Management regularly reviews deposit pricing and attempts to keep costs as low as possible, while remaining competitive. The net interest margin was 3.52% for 2016, 3.69% for 2015, and 3.66% for 2014.
2019.

The following presentation is an analysis of net interest income and related yields and rates, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the last three years. Nonaccrual loans are included in average balances. Interest income on nonaccrual loans, if recognized, is recorded on a cash basis or when the loan returns to accrual status.

31

Net Interest Income Analysis

(in thousands, except yields and rates)

  

Average Balance

  

Interest Income/Expense(1)

  

Average Yield/Rate

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Loans:

                                    

Commercial

 $372,538  $475,068  $306,065  $18,819  $17,768  $14,125   5.05%  3.74%  4.62%

Real estate

  1,584,856   1,531,195   1,388,188   67,887   69,525   68,050   4.28   4.54   4.90 

Consumer

  6,984   8,998   10,046   475   588   694   6.80   6.53   6.91 

Total loans(2)

  1,964,378   2,015,261   1,704,299   87,181   87,881   82,869   4.44   4.36   4.86 
                                     

Securities:

                                    

U.S. Treasury

  57,048   9,010      507   51      0.89   0.57    

Federal agencies and GSEs

  97,943   72,112   132,916   1,132   1,423   3,191   1.16   1.97   2.40 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  308,158   200,612   134,458   4,142   4,060   3,350   1.34   2.02   2.49 

State and municipal

  61,698   45,836   58,293   1,272   1,175   1,650   2.06   2.56   2.83 

Other securities

  24,707   20,382   16,552   1,205   1,098   903   4.88   5.39   5.46 

Total securities

  549,554   347,952   342,219   8,258   7,807   9,094   1.50   2.24   2.66 
                                     

Deposits in other banks

  453,867   188,700   60,651   598   440   1,261   0.13   0.23   2.08 
                                     

Total interest earning assets

  2,967,799   2,551,913   2,107,169   96,037   96,128   93,224   3.24   3.77   4.42 
                                     

Nonearning assets

  208,765   221,094   196,455                         
                                     

Total assets

 $3,176,564  $2,773,007  $2,303,624                         
                                     

Deposits:

                                    

Demand

 $476,710  $386,790  $307,329   152   344   370   0.03   0.09   0.12 

Money market

  710,948   574,510   445,505   758   2,634   5,246   0.11   0.46   1.18 

Savings

  243,123   198,313   166,842   26   117   284   0.01   0.06   0.17 

Time

  366,604   436,081   457,746   2,709   6,634   7,243   0.74   1.52   1.58 

Total interest bearing deposits

  1,797,385   1,595,694   1,377,422   3,645   9,729   13,143   0.20   0.61   0.95 
                                     

Customer repurchase agreements

  37,632   42,937   39,134   22   259   596   0.06   0.60   1.52 

Other short-term borrowings

     1   2,694         54   0.00   0.55   2.00 

Long-term borrowings

  31,878   35,586   33,644   1,738   2,032   1,935   5.45   5.71   5.75 

Total interest bearing liabilities

  1,866,895   1,674,218   1,452,894   5,405   12,020   15,728   0.29   0.72   1.08 
                                     

Noninterest bearing demand deposits

  939,186   746,659   537,775                         

Other liabilities

  22,325   22,777   20,933                         

Shareholders' equity

  348,158   329,353   292,022                         

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $3,176,564  $2,773,007  $2,303,624                         
                                     

Interest rate spread

                          2.95%  3.05%  3.34%

Net interest margin

                          3.05%  3.30%  3.68%
                                     

Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis)

              90,632   84,108   77,496             

Less: Taxable equivalent adjustment(3)

              241   288   369             

Net interest income

             $90,391  $83,820  $77,127             

______________________

(1) Interest income includes net accretion/amortization of acquired loan fair value adjustments and the net accretion/amortization of deferred loan fees/costs.

(2) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balances.

(3) A tax rate of 21% in 2021, 2020, and 2019 was used in adjusting interest on tax-exempt assets to a fully taxable equivalent basis.

32

 Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Rate
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Loans:                 
Commercial$229,239
 $198,326
 $156,646
 $8,829
 $7,856
 $6,893
 3.85% 3.96% 4.40%
Real estate1,031,558
 859,721
 809,545
 46,400
 39,763
 39,362
 4.50
 4.63
 4.86
Consumer4,652
 5,230
 9,669
 352
 605
 730
 7.57
 11.57
 7.55
Total loans1,265,449
 1,063,277
 975,860
 55,581
 48,224
 46,985
 4.39
 4.54
 4.81
                  
Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
Federal agencies and GSEs97,670
 96,009
 88,384
 1,849
 1,674
 1,364
 1.89
 1.74
 1.54
Mortgage-backed and CMOs82,042
 79,720
 61,741
 1,725
 1,635
 1,346
 2.10
 2.05
 2.18
State and municipal105,869
 160,279
 183,208
 3,781
 5,647
 6,746
 3.57
 3.52
 3.68
Other securities15,796
 15,953
 15,783
 707
 560
 532
 4.48
 3.51
 3.37
Total securities301,377
 351,961
 349,116
 8,062
 9,516
 9,988
 2.68
 2.70
 2.86
                  
Federal funds sold
 
 5,230
 
 
 6
 
 
 0.11
Deposits in other banks65,027
 55,410
 61,280
 734
 276
 204
 1.13
 0.50
 0.33
Total interest earning assets1,631,853
 1,470,648
 1,391,486
 64,377
 58,016
 57,183
 3.95
 3.94
 4.11
                  
Nonearning assets126,159
 127,501
 132,280
  
  
  
    
  
                  
Total assets$1,758,012
 $1,598,149
 $1,523,766
  
  
  
    
  
                  
Deposits: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Demand$217,833
 $216,521
 $223,825
 43
 99
 82
 0.02
 0.05
 0.04
Money market335,085
 239,262
 196,828
 1,668
 432
 260
 0.50
 0.18
 0.13
Savings125,157
 118,144
 109,697
 38
 47
 53
 0.03
 0.04
 0.05
Time383,444
 396,801
 404,366
 4,045
 4,525
 4,416
 1.05
 1.14
 1.09
Total deposits1,061,519
 970,728
 934,716
 5,794
 5,103
 4,811
 0.55
 0.53
 0.51
                  
Customer repurchase agreements46,335
 46,832
 48,105
 142
 5
 9
 0.31
 0.01
 0.02
Other short-term borrowings3,158
 656
 14
 31
 5
 
 0.98
 0.76
 0.36
Long-term borrowings36,887
 37,640
 37,515
 1,324
 1,203
 1,084
 3.59
 3.20
 2.89
Total interest bearing liabilities1,147,899
 1,055,856
 1,020,350
 7,291
 6,316
 5,904
 0.64
 0.60
 0.58
                  
Noninterest bearing demand deposits392,663
 330,315
 297,483
  
  
  
  
  
  
Other liabilities9,643
 9,904
 9,415
  
  
  
  
  
  
Shareholders' equity207,807
 202,074
 196,518
  
  
  
  
  
  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$1,758,012
 $1,598,149
 $1,523,766
  
  
  
  
  
  
                  
Interest rate spread 
  
  
  
  
  
 3.31% 3.34% 3.53%
Net interest margin 
  
  
  
  
  
 3.50% 3.52% 3.69%
                  
Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis)  
 57,086
 51,700
 51,279
      
Less: Taxable equivalent adjustment  
 1,339
 1,846
 2,014
    
  
Net interest income  
  
 $55,747
 $49,854
 $49,265
    
  

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense, and distinguishes between changes resulting from fluctuations in average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities (volume), and changes resulting from fluctuations in average interest rates on such assets and liabilities (rate). Changes attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately (dollars in thousands):

Changes in Net Interest Income (Rate / Volume Analysis)

  

2021 vs. 2020

  

2020 vs. 2019

 
      

Change

      

Change

 
  

Increase

  

Attributable to

  

Increase

  

Attributable to

 

Interest income

 

(Decrease)

  

Rate

  

Volume

  

(Decrease)

  

Rate

  

Volume

 

Loans:

                        

Commercial

 $1,051  $5,398  $(4,347) $3,643  $(3,056) $6,699 

Real estate

  (1,638)  (4,022)  2,384   1,475   (5,234)  6,709 

Consumer

  (113)  23   (136)  (106)  (36)  (70)

Total loans

  (700)  1,399   (2,099)  5,012   (8,326)  13,338 

Securities:

                        

U.S. Treasury

  456   44   412   51      51 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  (291)  (703)  412   (1,768)  (495)  (1,273)

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  82   (1,645)  1,727   710   (714)  1,424 

State and municipal

  97   (259)  356   (475)  (145)  (330)

Other securities

  107   (111)  218   195   (11)  206 

Total securities

  451   (2,674)  3,125   (1,287)  (1,365)  78 

Deposits in other banks

  158   (255)  413   (821)  (1,819)  998 

Total interest income

  (91)  (1,530)  1,439   2,904   (11,510)  14,414 
                         

Interest expense

                        

Deposits:

                        

Demand

  (192)  (258)  66   (26)  (109)  83 

Money market

  (1,876)  (2,388)  512   (2,612)  (3,833)  1,221 

Savings

  (91)  (113)  22   (167)  (213)  46 

Time

  (3,925)  (2,997)  (928)  (609)  (273)  (336)

Total deposits

  (6,084)  (5,756)  (328)  (3,414)  (4,428)  1,014 

Customer repurchase agreements

  (237)  (208)  (29)  (337)  (390)  53 

Other short-term borrowings

           (54)  (27)  (27)

Long-term borrowings

  (294)  (89)  (205)  97   (14)  111 

Total interest expense

  (6,615)  (6,053)  (562)  (3,708)  (4,859)  1,151 

Net interest income

 $6,524  $4,523  $2,001  $6,612  $(6,651) $13,263 

Fair Value Impact to Net Interest Margin

The Company's fully taxable equivalent net interest margin includes the impact of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments. The impact of net accretion for 2019, 2020, and 2021 and the remaining estimated net accretion are reflected in the following table (dollars in thousands):

  

Loans Accretion

  

Deposit Accretion

  

Borrowings Amortization

  

Total

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019

 $3,101  $375  $(89) $3,387 

For the year ended December 31, 2020

  4,516   181   (85)  4,612 

For the year ended December 31, 2021

  5,260   78   (101)  5,237 

For the years ending (estimated):

                

2022

              1,100 

2023

              690 

2024

              429 

2025

              292 

2026

              171 

Thereafter (estimated)

              234 

33

 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
 Increase 
Change
Attributable to
 Increase Change
Attributable to
Interest income(Decrease) Rate Volume (Decrease) Rate Volume
Loans:           
Commercial$973
 $(223) $1,196
 $963
 $(738) $1,701
Real estate6,637
 (1,119) 7,756
 401
 (1,972) 2,373
Consumer(253) (192) (61) (125) 293
 (418)
Total loans7,357
 (1,534) 8,891
 1,239
 (2,417) 3,656
Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
Federal agencies and GSEs175
 146
 29
 310
 186
 124
Mortgage-backed and CMOs90
 42
 48
 289
 (84) 373
State and municipal(1,866) 76
 (1,942) (1,099) (282) (817)
Other securities147
 153
 (6) 28
 22
 6
Total securities(1,454) 417
 (1,871) (472) (158) (314)
Federal funds sold
 
 
 (6) 6
 (12)
Deposits in other banks458
 403
 55
 72
 93
 (21)
Total interest income6,361
 (714) 7,075
 833
 (2,476) 3,309
            
Interest expense 
  
  
  
  
  
Deposits: 
  
  
  
  
  
Demand(56) (57) 1
 17
 20
 (3)
Money market1,236
 1,007
 229
 172
 108
 64
Savings(9) (12) 3
 (6) (10) 4
Time(480) (331) (149) 109
 193
 (84)
Total deposits691
 607
 84
 292
 311
 (19)
Customer repurchase agreements137
 137
 
 (4) (4) 
Other borrowings147
 90
 57
 124
 101
 23
Total interest expense975
 834
 141
 412
 408
 4
Net interest income$5,386
 $(1,548) $6,934
 $421
 $(2,884) $3,305

Noninterest Income

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, noninterest income increased $722,000$4,188,000, or 5.3%24.9%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2017 2016 $ Change % Change
Noninterest income:       
 Trust fees$3,926
 $3,791
 $135
 3.6 %
 Service charges on deposit accounts2,002
 2,048
 (46) (2.2)
 Other fees and commissions2,895
 2,680
 215
 8.0
 Mortgage banking income2,208
 1,713
 495
 28.9
 Securities gains, net812
 836
 (24) (2.9)
 Brokerage fees829
 843
 (14) (1.7)
 Income from Small Business Investment Companies236
 463
 (227) (49.0)
 Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net344
 (9) 353
 3,922.2
 Other975
 1,140
 (165) (14.5)
Total noninterest income$14,227
 $13,505
 $722
 5.3 %
A substantial portion of trust fees are earned based on account fair values, so changes in the equity markets may have a large2020.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest income:

                

Trust and brokerage fees

 $6,019  $4,789  $1,230   25.7%

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,611   2,557   54   2.1 

Interchange fees

  4,152   3,213   939   29.2 

Other fees and commissions

  801   712   89   12.5 

Mortgage banking income

  4,195   3,514   681   19.4 

Securities gains, net

  35   814   (779)  (95.7)

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  1,972   270   1,702   630.4 

Income from insurance investments

  1,199   321   878   273.5 

Losses on premises and equipment, net

  (885)  (110)  (775)  (704.5)

Other

  932   763   169   22.1 

Total noninterest income

 $21,031  $16,843  $4,188   24.9%

Trust and potentially volatile impact on revenue. Trustbrokerage fees increased slightly while service charges decreased slightly$1,230,000 for 20172021 compared to 2016. Other2020 caused by growth in clients and growth in market value. Interchange fees and commissions were positively impacted by higher levels ofincreased $939,000 year over year as consumers rely more heavily on debit card transaction volume.cards for spending versus cash. Mortgage banking income increased significantly$681,000 for 2021 compared to 2020. The increase in 2017 as a2021 was the result of increasescontinued historically low rates in the volume of originations. Also, the Bank added new mortgage originators2021 resulting in the Roanoke market in the fourth quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2017. Secondary market mortgage loanincreased application volume for 2017 was $86,612,000new purchases and refinancing of existing loans. Net securities gains decreased $779,000 in 2021 compared to $78,330,000 for 2016.2020. Income from Small Business Investment CompanyCompanies ("SBIC"SBICs") investments which is volatile and difficult to predict, decreased $227,000 or 49.0% for 2017increased $1,702,000 as the fund's investment companies improved their performance compared to 2016. Net gains (losses)2020. The investments held by the SBICs were significantly impacted in 2020 from the pandemic. Income from insurance investments increased $878,000 in 2021 compared to 2020. The Company received an additional earnings distribution in 2021 not received in 2020. The year ended December 31, 2021 reflected losses on premises and equipment, increased $353,000 for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a $337,000 gainnet of $588,000 from the sale of a bank owned commercial lottwo buildings acquired in the MidCarolina acquisition. Other income decreased $165,000HomeTown acquisition and the write-down of $218,000 on an additional property based on a current valuation. 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest income:

                

Trust and brokerage fees

 $4,789  $4,568  $221   4.8%

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,557   2,866   (309)  (10.8)

Interchange fees

  3,213   2,964   249   8.4 

Other fees and commissions

  712   729   (17)  (2.3)

Mortgage banking income

  3,514   2,439   1,075   44.1 

Securities gains, net

  814   607   207   34.1 

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  270   211   59   28.0 

Income from insurance investments

  321   328   (7)  (2.1)

Losses on premises and equipment, net

  (110)  (427)  317   (74.2)

Other

  763   885   (122)  (13.8)

Total noninterest income

 $16,843  $15,170  $1,673   11.0%

Trust and brokerage fees increased $221,000 for 20172020 compared to 2016 primarily2019. The Company saw decreases in overdraft and related fees, another component of service charge income, caused by consumer spending decreases due to the additional income from investmentsactions taken to combat COVID-19 primarily accounting for the $309,000 decrease in limited partnerships2020 versus 2019. These actions, which included stay-at-home orders and restaurant and retail changes, caused an increase of $249,000 in 2016.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2016 2015 $ Change % Change
Noninterest income:       
 Trust fees$3,791
 $3,935
 $(144) (3.7)%
 Service charges on deposit accounts2,048
 2,066
 (18) (0.9)
 Other fees and commissions2,680
 2,377
 303
 12.7
 Mortgage banking income1,713
 1,320
 393
 29.8
 Securities gains, net836
 867
 (31) (3.6)
 Brokerage fees843
 946
 (103) (10.9)
 Income from Small Business Investment Companies463
 912
 (449) (49.2)
 Other1,131
 864
 267
 30.9
Total noninterest income$13,505
 $13,287
 $218
 1.6 %
Trustinterchange fees and service charges decreased slightly for 2016in 2020 compared to 2015. Other fees and commissions were positively impacted by higher levels of debit card transaction volume.2019. Mortgage banking income increased significantly in 2016$1,075,000 for 2020 compared to 2015 as2019. The increase in 2020 is a result of increaseshistorically low rates in the volume of originations. Secondary market mortgage loan2020 resulting in increased application volume for 2016 was $78,330,000new purchases and refinancing of existing loans. Net securities gains increased $207,000 in 2020 compared to $59,030,000 for 2015. Income from SBIC investments decreased $449,000 or 49.2% for 2016 compared to 2015. Other income increased $267,000 for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the additional2019, while income from investments in limited partnerships.SBICs increased $59,000. The year ended December 31, 2020 benefitted from reduced losses on premises and equipment. Other noninterest income for 2020 was reduced by a loss on the sale of repossessed assets of $139,000.

34

Noninterest Expense

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, noninterest expense increased $3,082,000$4,443,000, or 7.7%8.1%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2017 2016 $ Change % Change
Noninterest expense:       
 Salaries$19,829
 $17,568
 $2,261
 12.9 %
 Employee benefits4,519
 4,264
 255
 6.0
 Occupancy and equipment4,487
 4,246
 241
 5.7
 FDIC assessment538
 647
 (109) (16.8)
 Bank franchise tax1,072
 995
 77
 7.7
 Core deposit intangible amortization528
 964
 (436) (45.2)
 Data processing2,014
 1,828
 186
 10.2
 Software1,144
 1,143
 1
 0.1
 Other real estate owned, net303
 336
 (33) (9.8)
 Other8,449
 7,810
 639
 8.2
Total noninterest expense$42,883
 $39,801
 $3,082
 7.7 %
2020.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest expense:

                

Salaries and employee benefits

 $32,342  $29,765  $2,577   8.7%

Occupancy and equipment

  6,032   5,586   446   8.0 

FDIC assessment

  864   639   225   35.2 

Bank franchise tax

  1,767   1,702   65   3.8 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,464   1,637   (173)  (10.6)

Data processing

  2,958   3,017   (59)  (2.0)

Software

  1,368   1,454   (86)  (5.9)

Other real estate owned, net

  131   60   71   118.3 

Other

  12,082   10,705   1,377   12.9 

Total noninterest expense

 $59,008  $54,565  $4,443   8.1%

Salaries expense increased $2,261,000, or 12.9%, in 2017 compared to 2016. The increase in salaries expense and employee benefits increased $2,577,000 in 2021 as compared to 2020. The year ended December 31, 2021 reflected additional incentive accruals based on annual results and increased commissions as the result of increased mortgage production. Occupancy expense resultedincreased $446,000 in 2021 as compared to 2020 primarily related to the full-year costs of the Triangle (North Carolina) banking office in 2021, which opened in late 2020. FDIC assessment expense increased $225,000 in 2021 compared to 2020 due to balance sheet growth and 2020 benefitted from the additionfinal installment of eight full timea $75,000 credit for Small Bank Assessment Credits. Other expenses increased $1,377,000 for loan related expenses, investment related expenses, investments in technology and normal expense seasonality.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

(Dollars in thousands)

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

Noninterest expense:

                

Salaries and employee benefits

 $29,765  $30,015  $(250)  (0.8)%

Occupancy and equipment

  5,586   5,417   169   3.1 

FDIC assessment

  639   119   520   437.0 

Bank franchise tax

  1,702   1,644   58   3.5 

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,637   1,398   239   17.1 

Data processing

  3,017   2,567   450   17.5 

Software

  1,454   1,295   159   12.3 

Other real estate owned, net

  60   31   29   93.5 

Merger related expenses

     11,782   (11,782)  (100.0)

Other

  10,705   11,806   (1,101)  (9.3)

Total noninterest expense

 $54,565  $66,074  $(11,509)  (17.4)%

Salaries and employee benefits decreased $250,000 in 2020 as compared to 2019. Total full-time equivalent employees during 2017. The Bank added two mortgage loan originators, a trust officer, and several branch level personnel. Onwere 342 at end of 2020, down from 355 at the support sideend of the Bank, additions were made2019; however, 2020 was impacted by salary expenses resulting from voluntary early retirement package costs. Contributing to the credit function, risk, anddecrease was a reduction in salary expenses of $1.7 million for the deferral of loan review.costs related to PPP originations. The expense for FDIC assessment decreasedexpense in 2017 due to2020 and 2019 was positively impacted by the reductionSmall Bank Assessment Credit, which reduced insurance expense $75,000 in FDIC assessment rates effective the third quarter of 2016.2020 and $492,000 in 2019. Core deposit intangible amortization decreasedincreased $239,000 in 20172020 compared to 2016 as the amortization expense relating2019 due to the Company'sHomeTown acquisition. Merger related expenses, which are related to the HomeTown acquisition and are nonrecurring in nature, totaled $11,782,000 during 2019. The increased expense for data processing in 2020 compared to 2019 of MidCarolina in July 2011 recognized under$450,000 was attributable to the accelerated method and will likely be fully amortized in 2020.increased costs as a result of a larger customer base after the HomeTown merger. The increase of $639,000decrease in other expenses for 2017noninterest expense in 2020 compared to 2016 is2019 was primarily due to increased marketing and printing for marketing campaigns and the de novo branch openings in 2017.

 Years Ended December 31,
 (Dollars in thousands)
 2016 2015 $ Change % Change
Noninterest expense:       
 Salaries$17,568
 $16,554
 $1,014
 6.1 %
 Employee benefits4,264
 4,311
 (47) (1.1)
 Occupancy and equipment4,246
 4,425
 (179) (4.0)
 FDIC assessment647
 750
 (103) (13.7)
 Bank franchise tax995
 898
 97
 10.8
 Core deposit intangible amortization964
 1,201
 (237) (19.7)
 Data processing1,828
 1,725
 103
 6.0
 Software1,143
 1,158
 (15) (1.3)
 Other real estate owned, net336
 99
 237
 239.4
 Merger related expenses
 1,998
 (1,998) (100.0)
 Other7,810
 7,424
 386
 5.2
Total noninterest expense$39,801
 $40,543
 $(742) (1.8)%
Salaries expense increased $1,014,000, or 6.1%, in 2016 compared to 2015. The major driver of this increase is additional compensation expense related to the de novo efforts in Roanoke, Virginia and Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The expense for FDIC assessment decreased in 2016reduced travel due to the reduction in FDIC assessment rates effectiveCOVID-19 pandemic and increased synergies from the third quarterHomeTown acquisition.

35

Income taxes on 20172021 earnings amounted to $10,826,000,$11,713,000, resulting in an effective tax rate of 41.5%21.2%, compared to 30.1%19.2% in 20162020 and 28.6%18.9% in 2015. Income tax expense for 2017 includes a one-time write-down of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $2.7 million, recorded as2019. As a result of the enactment of the Tax ReformCARES Act, on December 22, 2017. The Tax Reform Act reduces the federal corporateCompany recognized in the first quarter of 2020 a tax benefit for the net operating loss ("NOL") five-year carryback provision for the NOL acquired in the HomeTown merger. This NOL carryback tax benefit was the reason for the decreased rate from 35%in 2020 compared to 21% effective January 1, 2018.

2021. 

The effective tax rate is lowered by income that is not taxable for federal income tax purposes. The primary non-taxablenontaxable income is from state and municipal securities and loans.

Fair Value Impact to Pretax Income
The July 2011 merger with MidCarolina and the January 2015 merger with MainStreet had a material and positive impact on earnings. The ongoing financial impact of the mergers was mostly the result of the increase in earnings assets. However, the specific financial impact of the fair value related accounting adjustments is reflected in the following tables. The tables present the actual effect of the accretable and amortizable fair value adjustments attributable to the mergers on net interest income and pretax income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively (dollars in thousands):
     December 31, 2017  
 Income Statement Effect Premium/(Discount) Balance on December 31, 2016 Accretion (Amortization) For the year ended Remaining Premium/ (Discount) Balance  
Interest income/(expense):         
Acquired performing loansIncome $(1,976) $695
 $(1,281)  
Purchased impaired loansIncome (5,709) 1,541
 (4,168) (1)
FHLB advancesExpense 20
 (20) 
  
Junior subordinated debtExpense 1,659
 (102) 1,557
  
Net Interest Income   
 2,114
  
  
          
Non-interest (expense)   
  
  
  
Amortization of core deposit intangibleExpense $1,719
 (528) $1,191
  
Net non-interest expense   
 (528)  
  
          
Change in pretax income   
 $1,586
  
  
(1)Remaining discount balance includes $1,006,000 in reclassifications from the non-accretable difference.

     December 31, 2016  
 Income Statement Effect Premium/(Discount) Balance on December 31, 2016 Accretion (Amortization) For the year ended Remaining Premium/ (Discount) Balance  
Interest income/(expense):         
Acquired performing loansIncome $(3,061) $1,085
 $(1,976)  
Purchased impaired loansIncome (7,066) 1,357
 (5,709) (1)
FHLB advancesExpense 42
 (22) 20
  
Junior subordinated debtExpense 1,761
 (102) 1,659
  
Net Interest Income   
 2,318
  
  
          
Non-interest (expense)   
  
  
  
Amortization of core deposit intangibleExpense $2,683
 (964) $1,719
  
Net non-interest expense   
 (964)  
  
          
Change in pretax income   
 $1,354
  
  
(1)Remaining discount balance includes $2,197,000 in reclassifications from the non-accretable difference.
       December 31, 2015  
 Income Statement Effect Premium/(Discount) Balance on December 31, 2015 Additions for the year ended Accretion (Amortization) For the year ended Remaining Premium/ (Discount) Balance  
Interest income/(expense):           
Acquired performing loansIncome $(3,358) $(1,279) $1,576
 $(3,061)  
Purchased impaired loansIncome (3,424) (5,097) 1,455
 (7,066) (1)
Time depositsIncome 
 (288) 288
 
  
Time deposits - brokeredIncome 
 (2) 2
 
  
FHLB advancesExpense 65
 
 (23) 42
  
Junior subordinated debtExpense 1,862
 
 (101) 1,761
  
Net Interest Income   
 (6,666) 3,197
  
  
            
Non-interest (expense)   
    
  
  
Amortization of core deposit intangibleExpense $2,045
 1,839
 (1,201) $2,683
  
Net non-interest expense   
 1,839
 (1,201)  
  
            
Change in pretax income   
 $(4,827) $1,996
  
  
(1)Remaining discount balance includes $238,000 in reclassifications from the non-accretable difference.
Generally accepted accounting principles for business combinations require the acquired balance sheet to be valued at fair value at the time of the merger. In the context of acquiring a commercial bank, most of the balance sheet is interest rate sensitive and this can generate significant discounts or premiums to contractual values. These discounts or premiums will have potentially significant impact to net interest income and to net income.

The table below summarizes the impact of the fair value merger related accounting impact to net interest income and impact to pretax income of the MidCarolina (for table immediately below, "MC") and MainStreet (for table immediately below, "MS") acquisitions (dollars in thousands):
For the Years Ended December 31,2017 2016 2015
            
 MCMSTotal MCMSTotal MCMSTotal
            
Net interest income$1,167
$947
$2,114
 $1,450
$868
$2,318
 $2,268
$929
$3,197
Core deposit amortization(321)(207)(528) (717)(247)(964) (906)(295)(1,201)
Total pretax income$846
$740
$1,586
 $733
$621
$1,354
 $1,362
$634
$1,996
The MidCarolina acquisition was effective July 1, 2011. The MainStreet acquisition was effective January 1, 2015. Management expects that the fair value accounting financial impact of both acquisitions will continue to decline in subsequent quarters.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The majority of assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature and therefore differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. The most significant effect of inflation is on noninterest expenses that tend to rise during periods of inflation. Changes in interest rates have a greater impact on a financial institution's profitability than do the effects of higher costs for goods and services. Through its balance sheet management practices, the Company has the ability to react to those changes and measure and monitor its interest rate and liquidity risk.

Market Risk Management

Effectively managing market risk is essential to achieving the Company's financial objectives. Market risk reflects the risk of economic loss resulting from changes in interest rates and market prices. The Company is generally not subject to currency exchange risk or commodity price risk. The Company's primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk; however, market risk also includes liquidity risk. Both are discussed in the following sections.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest rate risk and its impact on net interest income is a primary market risk exposure. The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies approved by its Asset Liability Committee ("ALCO") and Board of Directors, both of which receive and review periodic reports of the Company's interest rate risk position.

The Company uses computer simulation analysis to measure the sensitivity of projected earnings to changes in interest rates. Simulation takes into account current balance sheet volumes and the scheduled repricing dates, instrument level optionality, and maturities of assets and liabilities. It incorporates numerous assumptions including growth, changes in the mix of assets and liabilities, prepayments, and average rates earned and paid. Based on this information, management uses the model to project net interest income under multiple interest rate scenarios.

A balance sheet is considered asset sensitive when its earning assets (loans and securities) reprice faster or to a greater extent than its liabilities (deposits and borrowings). An asset sensitive balance sheet will produce relatively more net interest income when interest rates rise and less net interest income when they decline. Based on the Company's simulation analysis, management believes the Company's interest sensitivity position at December 31, 20172021 is asset sensitive. As of early 2018, management expects that the general direction of market interest rates will be stable to up, though volatility, sometimes substantial, is anticipated in the short-term.


Earnings Simulation

The table below shows the estimated impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income as of December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands), assuming gradualinstantaneous and parallel changes in interest rates, and consistent levels of assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the following twelve months is projected to increase when interest rates are higher than current rates.

Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income

  

December 31, 2021

 
  

Change in net interest income

 

Change in interest rates

 

Amount

  

Percent

 
         

Up 4.0%

 $21,129   26.0%

Up 3.0%

  15,802   19.5 

Up 2.0%

  10,428   12.8 

Up 1.0%

  5,086   6.3 

Flat

      

Down 0.25%

  (1,013)  (1.2)

Down 1.00% (1)

  (3,294)  (4.1)

__________________________

(1) This scenario is deemed highly unlikely at this time due to the current low interest rate environment.

36

 December 31, 2017
 Change in net interest income
Change in interest ratesAmount Percent
    
Up  4.0%$10,089
 17.2%
Up  3.0%7,837
 13.3
Up  2.0%6,497
 9.3
Up  1.0%2,870
 4.9
Flat
 
Down 0.25%(916) (1.6)
Down 0.50%(2,048) (3.5)

Management cannot predict future interest rates or their exact effect on net interest income. Computations of future effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Certain limitations are inherent in such computations. Assets and liabilities may react differently than projected to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag changes in market interest rates. Interest rate shifts may not be parallel.

Changes in interest rates can cause substantial changes in the amount of prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, which may in turn affect the Company's interest rate sensitivity position. Additionally, credit risk may rise if an interest rate increase adversely affects the ability of borrowers to service their debt.

Economic Value Simulation

Economic value simulation is used to calculate the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities over different interest rate environments. Economic values are calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis. The net economic value of equity is the economic value of all assets minus the economic value of all liabilities. The change in net economic value over different rate environments is an indication of the longer-term earnings capability of the balance sheet. The same assumptions are used in the economic value simulation as in the earnings simulation. The economic value simulation uses instantaneous rate shocks to the balance sheet.

The following table reflects the estimated change in net economic value over different rate environments using economic value simulation for the balances at the period ended December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity

 December 31, 2017
Change in interest ratesAmount $ Change % Change
      
Up 4%$318,206
 $51,911
 19.5%
Up 3%315,178
 48,883
 18.4
Up 2%307,772
 41,477
 15.6
Up 1%293,160
 26,865
 10.1
Flat266,295
 
 
Down 0.25%255,239
 (11,056) (4.2)
Down 0.50%243,972
 (22,323) (8.4)

  

December 31, 2021

 

Change in interest rates

 

Amount

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
             

Up 4.0%

 $530,564  $196,627   58.9%

Up 3.0%

  494,139   160,202   48.0 

Up 2.0%

  451,739   117,802   35.3 

Up 1.0%

  398,702   64,765   19.4 

Flat

  333,937       

Down 0.25%

  312,684   (21,253)  (6.4)

Down 1.00% (1)

  236,244   (97,693)  (29.3)

__________________________

(1) This scenario is deemed highly unlikely at this time due to the current low interest rate environment.

Liquidity Risk Management

Liquidity is the ability of the Company in a timely manner to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and to raise additional funds by increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves maintaining the Company's ability to meet the daily cash flow requirements of its customers, whether they are borrowers requiring funds or depositors desiring to withdraw funds. Additionally, the Company requires cash for various operating needs including dividends to shareholders, the servicing of debt, and the payment of general corporate expenses. The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and liquidity needs through policies approved by the ALCO and Board of Directors, both of which receive periodic reports of the Company's interest rate risk and liquidity position. The Company uses a computer simulation model to assist in the management of the future liquidity needs of the Company.

Liquidity sources include on balance sheet and off balance sheet sources.

Balance sheet liquidity sources include cash, amounts due from banks, loan repayments, bond maturities and calls, and increases in deposits. Further, the Company maintains a large, high quality, very liquid bond portfolio, which is generally 50%0% to 60%50% unpledged and would, accordingly, be available for sale if necessary.

Off balance sheet sources include lines of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB"), federal funds lines of credit, and access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window.

The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB, equal to 30% of the Company's assets, subject to the amount of collateral pledged. Under the terms of its collateral agreement with the FHLB, the Company provides a blanket lien covering all of its residential first mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and commercial construction loans. In addition, the Company pledges as collateral its capital stock in and deposits with the FHLB. At December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, there were no principal advance obligations to the FHLB. The Company had outstanding $275,000,000 in FHLB consistedletters of $24,000,000 in variable-rate, short-term advances compared to $9,980,000 in fixed-rate, long-term advances and $20,000,000 in variable-rate, short-term advancescredit at December 31, 2016. The Company also had outstanding $190,700,0002021 compared to $245,000,000 in letters of credit at December 31, 2017 compared to $130,700,000 in letters of credit at December 31, 2016.2020. The letters of credit provide the Bank with additional collateral for securing public entity deposits above FDIC insurance levels, thereby providing less need for collateral pledging from the securities portfolio and accordingly increasing ourthe Company's balance sheet liquidity.

Short-term borrowing is discussed in Note 910 and long-term borrowing is discussed in Note 1011 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The Company has federal funds lines of credit established with two correspondent banks in the amountsamount of $15,000,000 each$60,000,000 and has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window. There were no amounts outstanding under these facilities at December 31, 2017.2021. The Company, through its subsidiary bank, has a relationship with IntraFi Promontory Network, the sponsoring entity for the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service® ("CDARS"). Through CDARS, theNetwork. The Company is able to provide deposit customers with access to aggregate FDIC insurance in amounts far exceeding $250,000. This gives the Company the ability, as and when needed, to attract and retain large deposits from insurance sensitive customers. CDARS are classifiedUnder the EGRRCPA signed into law on May 24, 2018, a well-capitalized bank with a CAMELS rating of 1 or 2 may hold reciprocal deposits up to the lesser of 20% of its total liabilities or $5 billion without those deposits being treated as brokered deposits, however they are generally derived from customers with whom our institution has or wishes to have a direct and ongoing core deposit relationship. As a result, management considers these deposits functionally, though not technically, in the same category as core deposits. With CDARS,IntraFi, the Company has the option to keep deposits on balance sheet or sell them to other members of the network. Additionally, subject to certain limits, the Company can use CDARSIntraFi to purchase cost-effective funding without collateralization and in lieu of generating funds through traditional brokered CDs or the FHLB. Thus, CDARSIntraFi serves as a deposit-gathering tool and an additional liquidity management tool. Deposits through the CDARSIntraFi program as of December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 were $25,838,000$550,000 and $23,445,000,$4,342,000, respectively.

The Bank also participates with the Promontory Network usingIntraFi Insured Cash Sweep,®, a product which provides the Bank the capability of providing additional deposit insurance to customers in the context of a money market account arrangement. The product is analogous to the CDARSIntraFi product discussed above.

 Average interest bearing deposits grew 12.6% in 2021. Customers have continued to maintain higher cash balances as future liquidity needs remain uncertain. This buildup of cash reserves primarily accounts for the significant increase over the same period of 2020. Management believes that these sourcesthe resources available to the Company will provide sufficient and timely liquidity, both on and off the balance sheet.sheet to support the programs and operations.

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Securities

The securities portfolio generates income, plays a strategic role in the management of interest rate sensitivity, provides a source of liquidity, and is used to meet collateral requirements. The securities portfolio consists of high quality investments, mostly federal agency, mortgage-backed, and state and municipal securities.


The Company is cognizant of the continuing historically low and recently volatile interestcurrently steady rate environment and has elected to maintain a defensiveexecute an asset liability strategy of purchasing high quality taxable securities with relatively low optionality and short and overall balanced duration.

38

The following table presents information on the amortized cost, maturities and taxable equivalent yields of available for sale securities at the end of the last three years (dollars in thousands):

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Taxable
Equivalent
Yield
Federal Agencies:           
Within 1 year$7,001
 1.49% $9,392
 1.16% $10,027
 0.56%
1 to 5 years48,789
 1.91
 27,039
 1.39
 34,105
 1.37
5 to 10 years45,973
 2.23
 57,467
 1.97
 29,958
 2.05
Over 10 years12,483
 2.02
 12,481
 2.02
 7,511
 2.70
Total114,246
 2.02
 106,379
 1.76
 81,601
 1.64
            
Mortgage-backed: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year
 
 1,919
 4.57
 
 
1 to 5 years2,770
 2.59
 4,040
 2.67
 6,442
 3.40
5 to 10 years22,849
 2.29
 15,242
 2.29
 15,841
 2.44
Over 10 years80,544
 2.28
 58,716
 1.99
 48,237
 2.12
Total106,163
 2.29
 79,917
 2.15
 70,520
 2.51
            
State and Municipal: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year4,539
 2.73
 11,637
 2.80
 17,769
 2.46
1 to 5 years52,975
 3.52
 73,558
 3.26
 77,385
 3.28
5 to 10 years27,411
 3.77
 47,977
 3.76
 59,031
 3.97
Over 10 years7,786
 3.03
 12,585
 3.36
 16,083
 3.87
Total92,711
 3.52
 145,757
 3.39
 170,268
 3.56
            
Corporate Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
Within 1 year
 
 2,313
 1.72
 249
 0.92
1 to 5 years1,042
 1.50
 4,279
 1.85
 7,914
 1.81
5 to 10 years500
 2.42
 500
 2.42
 2,456
 3.06
Over 10 years6,300
 5.41
 6,300
 5.41
 
 
Total7,842
 4.70
 13,392
 3.53
 10,619
 2.08
            
Preferred Stock: 
  
  
  
  
  
No maturity
 
 
 
 1,000
 6.00
Total
 
 
 
 1,000
 6.00
            
Common Stock: 
  
  
  
  
  
No maturity1,383
 
 1,288
 
 
 
Total1,383
 
 1,288
 
 
 
            
Total portfolio$322,345
 2.60% $346,733
 2.60% $334,008
 2.75%
During 2016, the Company's investment in preferred stock was converted to common stock. At

   As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
  

Taxable

  

Taxable

 
  

Equivalent

  

Equivalent

 
  

Yield

  

Yield

 

U. S. Treasury

        

Within 1 year

  -0.02

%

  0.08%

1 to 5 years

  0.71    

5 to 10 years

  1.22    

Over 10 years

      

Total

  0.69   0.08 
         

Federal Agencies:

        

Within 1 year

  0.29   2.68 

1 to 5 years

  1.09   0.62 

5 to 10 years

  1.68   1.99 

Over 10 years

  2.23   2.18 

Total

  1.12   1.15 
         

Mortgage-backed:

        

Within 1 year

  3.09   2.42 

1 to 5 years

  0.82   1.41 

5 to 10 years

  1.47   1.40 

Over 10 years

  1.61   1.61 

Total

  1.35   1.53 
         

State and Municipal:

        

Within 1 year

  2.02   2.47 

1 to 5 years

  1.91   2.13 

5 to 10 years

  1.87   2.02 

Over 10 years

  3.01   2.93 

Total

  2.01   2.23 
         

Corporate Securities:

        

Within 1 year

      

1 to 5 years

  2.42   2.42 

5 to 10 years

  3.67   5.11 

Over 10 years

      

Total

  3.63   5.01 
         

Common Stock:

        

No maturity

      

Total

      
       

Total portfolio

  1.29

%

  1.52 

The Company had no equity securities at December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had three common stock investments, nonesold $445,000 in equity securities at fair value and recognized in income $333,000.

The loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial and residential real estate loans, commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses, construction and land development loans, and home equity loans.


 At December 31, 2021, the commercial real estate portfolio included concentrations of $81,241,000, $46,049,000 and $204,655, 000 in hotel, restaurants, and retail, respectively. The concentrations total 17.1% of total loans, excluding loans in process.

Average loans decreased $50,883,000, or 2.5%, from 2020 to 2021, primarily the result of PPP forgiveness. Average loans increased $202,172,000$310,962,000, or 19.0%18.2%, from 20162019 to 2017. Average loans increased $87,417,000 or 9.0% from 2015 to 2016.

2020, mostly impacted by the HomeTown merger.

At December 31, 2017,2021, total loans, net of deferred fees and costs, were $1,336,125,000 an increase$1,946,580,000, a decrease of $171,304,0000$68,476,000, or 14.7%3.4%, from the prior year. The increase is primarily the result Excluding PPP loans of broad based organic loan growth$12,239,000 and the de novo branch start-ups$211,275,000 at December 31, 2021 and personnel hires in Roanoke, Virginia and Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

2020, respectively, loans held for investment grew by $130,598,000, or 7.2%.

Loans held for sale and associated with secondary mortgage activity totaled $1,639,000$8,481,000 at December 31, 20172021 and $5,996,000$15,591,000 at December 31, 2016.2020. Loan production volume was $86,612,000$191,232,000 and $78,330,000$178,459,000 for 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. These loans were approximately 35% purchase, 65% refinancing for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to approximately 40% purchase, 60% purchase, 40% refinancing.

refinancing for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Management of the loan portfolio is organized around portfolio segments. Each segment is comprised of various loan types that are reflective of operational and regulatory reporting requirements. The following table presents the Company's portfolio maturities as of the dates indicated by segment (dollars in thousands): 

Loans

  

As of December 31, 2021

 
  

Maturing within one year

  

Maturing after one but within five years

  

Maturing after five but within fifteen years

  

Maturing after fifteen years

  

Total

 

Real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

 $26,554  $83,005  $24,368  $294  $134,221 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  34,841   213,216   141,566   1,894   391,517 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  53,051   407,480   245,829   24,674   731,034 

Residential real estate

  20,908   135,926   100,842   32,081   289,757 

Home equity

  5,105   29,772   58,326      93,203 

Total real estate

  140,459   869,399   570,931   58,943   1,639,732 
                     

Commercial and industrial

  77,053   151,210   71,237   273   299,773 

Consumer

  1,040   3,668   438   1,929   7,075 
                     

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $218,552  $1,024,277  $642,606  $61,145  $1,946,580 
                     

Interest rate sensitivity:

                    

Fixed interest rates

 $134,104  $871,309  $544,894  $13,189  $1,563,496 

Floating or adjustable rates

  84,448   152,968   97,712   47,956   383,084 
                     

Total loans, gross

 $218,552  $1,024,277  $642,606  $61,145  $1,946,580 

Loans
40

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Real estate:         
Construction and land development$123,147
 $114,258
 $72,968
 $50,863
 $41,822
Commercial real estate637,701
 510,960
 430,186
 391,472
 364,616
Residential real estate209,326
 215,104
 220,434
 175,293
 171,917
Home equity109,857
 110,751
 98,449
 91,075
 87,797
Total real estate1,080,031
 951,073
 822,037
 708,703
 666,152
          
Commercial and industrial251,666
 208,717
 177,481
 126,981
 122,553
Consumer4,428
 5,031
 6,007
 5,241
 5,966
          
Total loans$1,336,125
 $1,164,821
 $1,005,525
 $840,925
 $794,671

The following table provides loan balance information by geographic regions. In some circumstances, loans may be originated in one region for borrowers located in other regions (dollars in thousands):

Loans by Geographic Region

  

December 31, 2021

  

Percentage Change in Balance Since

 
      

Percentage

  

December 31,

 
  

Balance

  

of Portfolio

  

2020

 

Danville region

 $182,225   9.4%  (27.3)%

Central region

  129,704   6.7   1.7 

Southside region

  65,215   3.4   (20.9)

Eastern region

  107,013   5.5   2.4 

Franklin region

  109,292   5.6   (20.0)

Roanoke region

  391,695   20.1   (8.8)

New River Valley region

  121,409   6.2   (7.3)

Alamance region

  263,753   13.5   (4.1)

Guilford region

  307,451   15.8   (1.7)

Winston-Salem region

  148,337   7.6   27.7 

Triangle region

  120,486   6.2   145.9 
             

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $1,946,580   100.0%  (3.4)%

41

 As of December 31, 2017 
Percentage Change
in Balance Since
December 31, 2016
Balance 
Percentage
of Portfolio
 
Danville region$230,498
 17.2% 1.4%
Central region157,168
 11.8
 4.5
Southside region73,217
 5.5
 (13.3)
Eastern region97,978
 7.3
 12.6
Franklin region107,853
 8.1
 (3.0)
Roanoke region93,673
 7.0
 127.7
Alamance region242,433
 18.1
 5.2
Guilford region285,727
 21.4
 25.3
Winston-Salem region47,578
 3.6
 891.4
      
Total loans$1,336,125
 100.0% 14.7%
The large year over year increases in the Roanoke region and Winston-Salem region were primarily due to the de novo offices and personnel hires in these regions. Management expects continued growth in those markets, but at a reduced velocity. The large year over year increase in the Guilford region was primarily the result

The Danville region consists of offices in Danville, Virginia and Yanceyville, North Carolina. The Central region consists of offices in Bedford, Lynchburg, and the counties of Bedford and Campbell County, Virginia. The Southside region consists of offices


in Martinsville and Henry County, Virginia. The Eastern region consists of offices in South Boston and the counties of Halifax and Pittsylvania, Virginia. The Franklin region consists of offices in Rocky Mount Union Hall, and Hardy, Virginia. The Roanoke region consists of offices in Roanoke, Salem, and Roanoke County, Virginia. The New River Valley region consists of an office in Roanoke County,Christiansburg, Virginia. The Alamance region consists of offices in Burlington, Graham, and Mebane, North Carolina. The Guilford region consists of offices in Greensboro, North Carolina. The Winston-Salem region consists of an office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
 The Triangle region consists of an office in Raleigh, North Carolina.

The Company does not participate in or have any highly leveraged lending transactions, as defined by bank regulations. The Company has no foreign loans. There were no concentrations of loans to any individual, group of individuals, business, or industry that exceeded 10% of total loans at December 31, 20172021 or 2016.

The following table presents the maturity schedule of selected loan types (dollars in thousands):
Maturities of Selected Loan Types
December 31, 2017
 
Commercial
and
Industrial (1)
 
Construction
and Land
Development
 Total
1 year or less$48,156
 $21,328
 $69,484
1 to 5 years (2)140,022
 82,545
 222,567
After 5 years (2)63,488
 19,274
 82,762
Total$251,666
 $123,147
 $374,813
(1)Includes agricultural loans.
(2)Of the loans due after one year, $196,283 have predetermined interest rates and $109,046 have floating or adjustable interest rates.
2020.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company had a negative provision (recovery) for loan losses of $2,825,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a provision for loan losses was $1,016,000, $250,000,of $8,916,000 and $950,000$456,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

The negative provision (recovery) in 2021 was the result of improved economic data supporting changes to the qualitative factors. The larger provision for 2017 related2020 reflects an increase in allowance requirements in response to continued loan growth but was mitigatedthe declining and uncertain economic landscape caused by continued strong asset quality metrics and improving local and national economic indicators.the COVID-19 pandemic during the period. The smaller provision expenseincrease in 2016 related2020 can be attributed to improvement in various qualitative factors, notably asset quality, local economic conditions and continued decline in historical loss factors compared to 2015. Improvements in asset quality were apparent in declines in past due and nonaccrual loans, as well asa measurable increase in qualitative factors related to significant contractions in economic data for asset qualityboth national and economic conditions, which were somewhat offset by additional factors assigned to unseasoned loanslocal economies and a significant increase in new markets.unemployment rates. The provision expense in 2015for 2019 primarily related to thea $156,000 increase in organicthe impaired loan reserve and loan growth andduring the relatively rapid maturities and renewalsfourth quarter of the performing acquired loan portfolio of MainStreet and their resulting transfer to the regular loan portfolio.

2019. 

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the ALLL is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.

The ALLL was $13,603,000, $12,801,000,$18,678,000 and $12,601,000$21,403,000 at December 31, 2017, 2016,2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The ALLL as a percentage of loans at each of those dates were 1.02%was 0.96%, 1.10%1.06%, and 1.25%0.72%, respectively.

 Excluding PPP loans, the allowance as a percentage of loans increased to 0.97% at December 31, 2021.

The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of loans during 2017 and 20162021 as compared to 2020 was primarily due to continued high asset quality, low charge-offs, and improvementimprovements in various qualitative factors, notably economic, and legal, used in the determination of the allowance. The increase in the allowance as a percentage of loans during 20152020 as compared to 2019 was primarily impacted bydue to the January 2015 acquisitioneconomic effects of MainStreet.the COVID-19 pandemic. 

In an effort to better evaluate the adequacy of its ALLL, the Company computes its ASC 450, Contingencies, loan balance by reducing total loans by acquired loans and loans that were evaluated for impairment individually or smaller balance nonaccrual loans evaluated for impairment in homogeneous pools. It also adjusts its ASC 450 loan loss reserve balance total by removing allowances associated with these other pools of loans.

The general allowance, ASC 450 (FAS 5) reserves to ASC 450 loans, was 1.04%1.01% at December 31, 2017,2021, compared to 1.17%1.16% at December 31, 2016.2020. On a dollar basis, the reserve was $13,151,000$18,004,000 at December 31, 2017,2021, compared to $12,429,000$20,534,000 at December 31, 2016.2020. The percentage of the reserve to total loans has declineddecreased due to improving local and national economic


conditions and continued improvement in asset quality metrics.improved qualitative factors as the economy continues to improve from 2020. This segment of the allowance represents by far the largest portion of the loan portfolio and the largest aggregate risk.
 There is no allowance for performing acquired loans in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company was considered a small reporting company under the Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments," and is not subject to adoption of this standard until January 1, 2023. Refer to "Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the consolidated financial statements for further information. The Company is working with a third-party vendor for implementation and running parallel models beginning with the first quarter of 2022. The adoption of the standard is not considered to materially impact the Company but the amount is not yet known.

The specific allowance, ASC 310-40 (FAS 114) reserves to ASC 310-40 loans was 5.18% at December 31, 2017, compared to 0.47% at December 31, 2016. On a dollar basis, the reserve was $167,000 at December 31, 2017, compared to $23,000 at December 31, 2016. The increase in the dollar amount of the reserve was related to changes in characteristics of loans reviewed individually for impairment. There is ongoing turnover in the composition of the impaired loan population, which decreased $1,627,000 from December 31, 2016.

The specific allowanceimmaterial and does not include reserves related to acquired loans with deteriorated credit quality. This reserve was $285,000$667,000 at December 31, 2017,2021, compared to $349,000$839,000 at December 31, 2016.2020. This is the only portion of the reserve related to acquired loans. Cash flow expectations for these loans are reviewed on a quarterly basis and unfavorable changes in those estimates relative to the initial estimates can result in the need for specific loan loss provision.
provisions.

The following table presents the Company's loan loss and recovery experience for the past five years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (dollars in thousands):

Summary of Loan Loss ExperienceExperience*

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Balance at beginning of period

 $21,403  $13,152 
         

Charge-offs:

        

Construction and land development

      

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  3   17 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

     165 

Residential real estate

  53   90 

Home equity

     27 

Total real estate

  56   299 

Commercial and industrial

     505 

Consumer

  90   202 

Total charge-offs

  146   1,006 
         

Recoveries:

        

Construction and land development

     2 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  7   12 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  8   50 

Residential real estate

  42   63 

Home equity

  57   22 

Total real estate

  114   149 

Commercial and industrial

  40   65 

Consumer

  92   127 

Total recoveries

  246   341 
         

Net (recoveries) charge-offs

  (100)  665 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  (2,825)  8,916 

Balance at end of period

 $18,678  $21,403 

*Net charge-offs by category are insignificant.

43

  Year Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Balance at beginning of period $12,801
 $12,601
 $12,427
 $12,600
 $12,118
           
Charge-offs:  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development 35
 
 20
 
 
Commercial real estate 58
 10
 462
 510
 164
Residential real estate 159
 21
 15
 121
 213
Home equity 13
 66
 308
 137
 156
Total real estate 265
 97
 805
 768
 533
Commercial and industrial 282
 40
 175
 101
 129
Consumer 143
 189
 220
 95
 175
Total charge-offs 690
 326
 1,200
 964
 837
           
Recoveries:  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development 43
 11
 81
 28
 227
Commercial real estate 17
 21
 43
 38
 96
Residential real estate 45
 53
 121
 126
 179
Home equity 40
 15
 18
 65
 65
Total real estate 145
 100
 263
 257
 567
Commercial and industrial 223
 40
 32
 51
 335
Consumer 108
 136
 129
 83
 123
Total recoveries 476
 276
 424
 391
 1,025
           
Net charge-offs (recoveries) 214
 50
 776
 573
 (188)
Provision for loan losses 1,016
 250
 950
 400
 294
Balance at end of period $13,603
 $12,801
 $12,601
 $12,427
 $12,600

The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by major portfolio segments for the past five yearsat December 31, 2021 and 2020 (dollars in thousands):

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount % Amount %
                    
Commercial$2,413
 18.8% $2,095
 17.9% $2,065
 17.7% $1,818
 15.1% $1,810
 15.4%
                    
Commercial real estate8,321
 57.0
 7,355
 53.7
 6,930
 50.0
 6,814
 52.6
 6,819
 51.1
                    
Residential real estate2,825
 23.9
 3,303
 28.0
 3,546
 31.7
 3,715
 31.7
 3,690
 32.7
                    
Consumer44
 0.3
 48
 0.4
 60
 0.6
 80
 0.6
 99
 0.8
                    
Unallocated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 182
 
                    
Total$13,603
 100.0% $12,801
 100.0% $12,601
 100.0% $12,427
 100.0% $12,600
 100.0%

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 
  

Amount

  

%

  

Amount

  

%

 
                 

Commercial

 $2,668   15.4% $3,373   24.4%

Construction and land development

  1,397   6.9   1,927   7.0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  3,964   20.1   4,340   18.5 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  7,141   37.6   7,626   31.1 

Residential real estate

  3,458   19.7   4,067   18.6 

Consumer

  50   0.3   70   0.4 
                 

Total

 $18,678   100.0% $21,403   100.0%

__________________________

% - represents the percentage of loans in each category to total loans.

Asset Quality Indicators

The following table provides certain qualitative indicators relevant to the Company's loan portfolio for the past fivethree years.

Asset Quality Ratios
 As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Allowance to loans*1.02% 1.10% 1.25% 1.48% 1.59%
ASC 450/general allowance1.04
 1.17
 1.40
 1.55
 1.75
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to year-end allowance1.57
 0.39
 6.16
 4.61
 (1.49)
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans0.02
 0.00
 0.08
 0.07
 (0.02)
Nonperforming assets to total assets*0.21
 0.29
 0.48
 0.46
 0.65
Nonperforming loans to loans*0.19
 0.30
 0.52
 0.49
 0.64
Provision to net charge-offs (recoveries)474.77
 500.00
 122.42
 69.81
 (156.38)
Provision to average loans0.08
 0.02
 0.10
 0.05
 0.04
Allowance to nonperforming loans*531.37
 360.39
 242.09
 302.21
 248.47
* -

Asset Quality Ratios

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Allowance to loans (1)

  0.96%  1.06%  0.72%

ASC 450/general allowance (2)

  1.01   1.16   0.87 

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to year-end allowance

  (0.54)  3.11   0.83 

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

  (0.01)  0.03   0.01 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

  0.07   0.12   0.15 

Nonperforming loans to loans

  0.11   0.13   0.13 

Provision to net charge-offs (recoveries)

  2,825.00   1,340.75   418.35 

Provision (recovery) to average loans

  (0.14)  0.44   0.03 

Allowance to nonperforming loans

  840.59   793.88   570.59 

__________________________

(1) Excluding PPP loans, 0.97% and 1.19%, at year end.

December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 (2) Excluding PPP loans, 1.01% and 1.32% at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Nonperforming Assets (Loans and Other Real Estate Owned)

Nonperforming loans include loans on which interest is no longer accrued and accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more. Nonperforming loans include loans originated and loans acquired.

acquired exclusive of purchased credit impaired loans.

Nonperforming loans to total loans were 0.19%0.11% at December 31, 2017 compared to 0.30%2021 and 0.13% at December 31, 2016.2020. The decrease in nonperforming loans during 20172021 was $992,000.

$474,000.

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate. Nonperforming assets represented 0.21% at December 31, 2017 compared to 0.29%0.07% of total assets at December 31, 2016.2021 compared to 0.12% of total assets at December 31, 2020. The Company continues to monitor the significant impact to its borrowers caused by COVID-19 and anticipates increases in nonperforming assets as a result, but the total cannot be determined at this time.

In most cases, it is the policy of the Company that any loan that becomes 90 days past due will automatically be placed on nonaccrual loan status, accrued interest reversed out of income, and further interest accrual ceased. Any payments received on such loans will be credited to principal. In some cases, a loan in process of renewal may become 90 days past due. In these instances, the loan may still be accruing because of a delayed renewal process in which the customer has not been billed. In accounting for acquired impaired loans, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual when they become 90 days past due. They are considered to be accruing because their interest income relates to the accretable yield and not to contractual interest payments.

Loans will only be restored to full accrual status after six consecutive months of payments that were each less than 30 days delinquent. The Company strictly adheres with this policy before restoring a loan to normal accrual status.


The following table presents the Company's nonperforming asset history, including acquired impaired loans as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
Nonperforming Assets
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Nonaccrual loans:         
Real estate$2,111
 $2,928
 $5,022
 $4,111
 $5,060
Commercial90
 19
 90
 
 11
Consumer
 18
 2
 1
 
Total nonaccrual loans2,201
 2,965
 5,114
 4,112
 5,071
          
Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest: 
  
  
  
  
Real estate359
 587
 84
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 7
 
 
Total past due loans359
 587
 91
 
 
          
Total nonperforming loans2,560
 3,552
 5,205
 4,112
 5,071
          
Other real estate owned, net1,225
 1,328
 2,184
 2,119
 3,422
          
Total nonperforming assets$3,785
 $4,880
 $7,389
 $6,231
 $8,493

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following table showsTotal impaired loans, that were considered impaired, exclusive of acquiredpurchased credit impaired loans, as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Impaired Loans
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Accruing$1,016
 $2,059
 $1,171
 $989
 $958
On nonaccrual status2,201
 2,785
 3,536
 3,548
 5,071
Total impaired loans$3,217
 $4,844
 $4,707
 $4,537
 $6,029
at December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $2,232,000 and $2,852,000, respectively.  

Troubled Debt Restructurings ("TDRs")

TDRs exist whenever the Company makes a concession to a customer based on the customer's financial distress that would not have otherwise been made in the normal course of business.

There were $1,306,000$1,725,000 in TDRs at December 31, 20172021 compared to $2,670,000$1,976,000 at December 31, 2016.

2020.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned

OREO is carried on the consolidated balance sheets at $1,225,000$143,000 and $1,328,000$958,000 as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. Foreclosed assets are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell, at the date of foreclosure. Loan losses resulting from foreclosure are charged against the ALLL at that time. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management, and the assets are carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value, less estimated costs to sell, with any additional write-downs charged against earnings. For significant assets, these valuations are


typically outside annual appraisals. The following table shows OREO as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Construction and land development$318
 $139
 $886
 $1,577
 $1,683
1-4 family residential629
 653
 643
 382
 1,400
Commercial real estate278
 536
 655
 160
 339
  Total OREO$1,225
 $1,328
 $2,184
 $2,119
 $3,422

Deposits

The Company's deposits consist primarily of checking, money market, savings, and consumer and commercial time deposits. Average deposits increased $153,139,000,$394,000,000, or 11.8%16.8%, in 2017, after increasing $68,844,000, or 5.6%, in 2016. Although deposit growth was widespread,2021, mostly a large partresult of continued higher than average cash balances being maintained by customers as the uncertainty of the increase in 2017 was due to the de novo officespandemic continues and personnel hires in Roanoke, Virginia and Winston-Salem, North Carolina. This growth is mostly in non-maturity, core deposits, the heart of the Company's balance sheet.

a trend that is consistent for all commercial banks. 

Period-end total deposits increased $164,086,000,$279,000,000, or 12.0%10.7%, during 2017. The increase was primarily related2021. Customers have continued to steady growth in core deposits, which is consistent with the Company's asset liability strategy.maintain higher cash balances as future liquidity needs remain uncertain. The Company has only a relatively small portion of its time deposits provided by wholesale sources. These include brokered time deposits, of which there were none at year end 2017, 2016, and 2015, and time deposits through the CDARSIntraFi program, which at year endyear-end totaled $25,838,000$550,000 for 2017, $23,445,0002021 and $4,342,000 for 2016, and $23,633,000 for 2015.2020. Management considers the CDARSIntraFi deposits the functional though not regulatory, equivalent of core deposits because they relate to balances derived from customers with long standing relationships with the Company.

Average deposits and rates for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):

Deposits

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 
  

Average

      

Average

     
  

Balance

  

Rate

  

Balance

  

Rate

 

Noninterest bearing deposits

 $939,186   % $746,659   %

Interest bearing accounts:

                

NOW accounts

 $476,710   0.03% $386,790   0.09%

Money market

  710,948   0.11   574,510   0.46 

Savings

  243,123   0.01   198,313   0.06 

Time

  366,604   0.74   436,081   1.52 

Total interest bearing deposits

 $1,797,385   0.20% $1,595,694   0.61%

Average total deposits

 $2,736,571   0.13% $2,342,353   0.42%

Deposits
45

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 
Average
Balance
 Rate Average
Balance
 Rate Average
Balance
 Rate
Noninterest bearing deposits$392,663
 % $330,315
 % $297,483
 %
Interest bearing accounts: 
  
  
  
  
  
NOW accounts$217,833
 0.02% $216,521
 0.05% $223,825
 0.04%
Money market335,085
 0.50
 239,262
 0.18
 196,828
 0.13
Savings125,157
 0.03
 118,144
 0.04
 109,697
 0.05
Time383,444
 1.05
 396,801
 1.14
 404,366
 1.09
Total interest bearing deposits$1,061,519
 0.55% $970,728
 0.53% $934,716
 0.51%
Average total deposits$1,454,182
 0.40% $1,301,043
 0.40% $1,232,199
 0.39%

Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More

Certificatesover $250,000 

At December 31, 2021, certificates of deposit that meet or exceed the FDIC insurance limit held by the Company were $153,253,000. The following table provides information on the maturity distribution of the time deposits exceeding the FDIC insurance limit at December 31, 2017 in amounts of $100,000 or more were classified by maturity as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31, 2017
3 months or less$29,502
Over 3 through 6 months26,382
Over 6 through 12 months49,582
Over 12 months158,992
Total$264,458

Certificates of Deposit of $250,000 or More
Certificates of deposit at December 31, 2017 in amounts2021. Amounts of $250,000 or more were classified by maturity as follows (dollars in thousands):
 December 31, 2017
3 months or less$21,064
Over 3 through 6 months8,974
Over 6 through 12 months29,446
Over 12 months103,297
Total$162,781

  

December 31, 2021

 

3 months or less

 $29,186 

Over 3 through 6 months

  76,129 

Over 6 through 12 months

  22,113 

Over 12 months

  25,825 

Total

 $153,253 

The Company's total uninsured deposits, which are the amounts of deposit accounts that exceed the FDIC insurance limit, currently $250,000, were approximately $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These amounts were estimated based on the same methodologies and assumptions used for regulatory reporting purposes.

Borrowed Funds

In addition to internal deposit generation, the Company also relies on borrowed funds as a supplemental source of funding. Borrowed funds consist of customer repurchase agreements, overnight borrowings from the FHLB and longer-term FHLB advances, subordinated debt acquired in the HomeTown merger, and trust preferred capital notes. Customer repurchase agreements are borrowings collateralized by securities of the U.S. Government, its agencies, or Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSEs") and generally mature daily. The Company considers these accounts to be a stable and low cost source of funds. The securities underlying these agreements remain under the Company's control. Refer to Notes 10 andNote 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of long-term debt.

The following table presents information pertaining to the Company's short-term borrowed funds as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
Short-Term Borrowings
  As of December 31,
  2017 2016
     
Customer repurchase agreements $10,726
 $39,166
FHLB overnight borrowings 24,000
 20,000
Total $34,726
 $59,166
     
Weighted interest rate 1.10% 0.29%
     
Average for the year ended:  
  
Outstanding $49,493
 $47,488
Interest rate 0.35% 0.02%
     
Maximum month-end outstanding $63,921
 $59,166

In the regular course of conducting its business, the Company takes deposits from political subdivisions of the states of Virginia and North Carolina. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank's public deposits totaled $265,543,000. $326,595,000. The Company is legally required to provide collateral to secure the deposits that exceed the insurance coverage provided by the FDIC. This collateral can be provided in the form of certain types of government agency bonds or letters of credit from the FHLB. At year-end 2017,2021, the Company had $190,000,000$275,000,000 in letters of credit with the FHLB outstanding to supplement collateral for such deposits.

Shareholders' Equity

The Company's goal with capital management is to be classified as "well capitalized" undercomply with all regulatory capital ratiosrequirements and to support growth, while generating acceptable returns on equity and paying a high rate of dividends.

Shareholders' equity was $208,717,000$354,792,000 at December 31, 20172021 and $201,380,000$337,894,000 at December 31, 2016.

2020.

The Company declared and paid quarterly dividends totaling $0.97$1.09 per share for 2017, $0.962021, $1.08 per share for 2016,2020, and $0.93$1.04 per share for 2015.2019. Cash dividends in 20172021 totaled $8,384,000$11,827,000 and represented a 55.0%27.2% payout of 20172021 net income, compared to a 50.7%39.4% payout in 2016,2020, and a 53.6%52.4% payout in 2015.


In July 2013, the FRB and OCC issued final rules that make technical changes to its capital rules to align them with the Basel III regulatory capital framework and meet certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules maintain the general structure of the prompt corrective action framework in effect at such time while incorporating certain increased minimum requirements. 2019.

Effective January 1, 2015, the final rulesCompany and the Bank became subject to the Basel III Capital Rules. The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to comply with the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a newratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%), (ii) a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%), (iii) a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%), and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets. In addition, to be well capitalized under the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDIA, the Bank must have the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets;at least 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6.0% of risk-weighted assets (increased from the prior requirement of 4.0%)at least 8.0%; (iii) a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets (unchanged from the prior requirement)at least 10.0%; and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4.0%at least 5.0%.

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the EGRRCPA that will permit qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to opt into the CBLR framework. Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of total assets (unchanged from the prior requirement). These are the initialgreater than 9% would not be subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements whichunder the Basel III Capital Rules and will be phased-in overdeemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a four-yearcommunity bank that falls out of compliance with the framework will have a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, provided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the grace period. When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the rules will require theThe CBLR framework was first available for banking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. The Company and the Bank do not currently expect to maintain such minimum ratios plus a 2.5% "capital conservation buffer" (other than foropt into the leverage ratio). The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. Management believes the Company and the Bank will be compliant with the fully phased-in requirements when they become effective January 1, 2019.

CBLR framework.

The following table represents the major regulatory capital ratios for the Company as of the dates indicated:

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Risk-Based Capital Ratios:         
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio11.50% 11.77% 12.88% NA
 NA
Tier 1 capital ratio13.42% 13.83% 15.23% 16.59% 16.88%
Total capital ratio14.39% 14.81% 16.34% 17.86% 18.14%
          
Leverage Capital Ratios:         
Tier 1 leverage ratio10.95% 11.67% 12.05% 12.16% 11.81%

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Risk-Based Capital Ratios:

        

Common equity tier 1 capital ratio

  12.43%  12.36%

Tier 1 capital ratio

  13.73%  13.78%

Total capital ratio

  14.61%  15.18%
         

Leverage Capital Ratios:

        

Tier 1 leverage ratio

  9.13%  9.48%

Management believes the Company is in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements applicable to it, and the Bank meetmeets the requirements to be considered "well capitalized" for all regulatory capital ratiosunder the prompt corrective action framework as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Stock Repurchase Programs

In 2021, the Company repurchased 265,939 shares at an average cost of $33.08 per share for a total cost of $8,810,000. In 2020, the Company repurchased 140,526 shares at an average cost of $35.44 per share for a total cost of $4,981,000. In 2019, the Company repurchased 85,868 shares at an average cost of $36.64 per share for a total cost of $3,146,000. 

On November 19, 2015,January 20, 2022, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its Board of a stock repurchase program. The program authorized the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock over a two year period. The share purchase limit was established at such number of shares equal to approximately 3.5% of the 8,622,000 common shares then outstanding at the time the Board approved the program. The program expired on November 19, 2017.

The Company did not repurchase any shares during 2017. During 2016, the Company repurchased 51,384 shares at an average cost of $25.14 per share, for a total cost of $1,292,000.
On January 19, 2018, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC to announce the approval by its BoardDirectors of another stock repurchase program. The program authorizes the repurchase of up to 300,000 shares$13 million of the Company's common stock over a two year period.
through December 31, 2022.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following items are contractual obligations of the Company as of December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

 Payments Due By Period
 Total Under 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More than 5 years
          
Time deposits$383,658
 $157,040
 $79,781
 $140,823
 $6,014
Repurchase agreements10,726
 10,726
 
 
 
FHLB borrowings24,000
 24,000
 
 
 
Operating leases1,012
 726
 251
 20
 15
Junior subordinated debt27,826
 
 
 
 27,826

  

Payments Due By Period

 
  

Total

  

Under 1 Year

  

1-3 Years

  

3-5 Years

  

More than 5 years

 
                     

Time deposits

 $354,703  $246,629  $59,451  $42,163  $6,460 

Repurchase agreements

  41,128   41,128          

Operating leases

  4,521   1,043   1,458   731   1,289 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,232            28,232 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES

The Company enters into certain financial transactions in the ordinary course of performing traditional banking services that result in off-balance sheet transactions. Other than AMNB Statutory Trust I, formed in 2006 to issue trust preferred securities, and the MidCarolina Trust I and MidCarolina Trust II, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet subsidiaries. Refer to Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of junior subordinated debt. Off-balance sheet transactions were as follows as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments2017 2016
    
Commitments to extend credit$341,760
 $345,803
Standby letters of credit13,647
 4,088
Mortgage loan rate-lock commitments5,089
 12,839

  

December 31,

 

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

 

2021

  

2020

 
         

Commitments to extend credit

 $654,436  $503,272 

Standby letters of credit

  10,201   17,355 

Mortgage loan rate-lock commitments

  10,891   26,883 

Commitments to extend credit to customers represent legally binding agreements with fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being funded, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future funding requirements. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company guaranteeing the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information is incorporated herein by reference from Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this Form 10-K.


ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Quarterly Financial Results

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2021

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $24,204  $23,167  $24,277  $24,148  $95,796 

Interest expense

  1,781   1,396   1,184   1,044   5,405 
                     

Net interest income

  22,423   21,771   23,093   23,104   90,391 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

     (1,352)  482   (1,955)  (2,825)

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  22,423   23,123   22,611   25,059   93,216 
                     

Noninterest income

  5,922   5,142   5,123   4,844   21,031 

Noninterest expense

  14,065   14,637   14,843   15,463   59,008 
                     

Income before income taxes

  14,280   13,628   12,891   14,440   55,239 

Income taxes

  2,991   2,862   2,713   3,147   11,713 

Net income

 $11,289  $10,766  $10,178  $11,293  $43,526 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.99  $1.03  $0.94  $1.05  $4.00 

Net income - diluted

  0.99   1.03   0.94   1.05   4.00 

Cash dividends

  0.27   0.27   0.27   0.28   1.09 

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2020

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $23,866  $23,297  $24,179  $24,498  $95,840 

Interest expense

  3,947   3,037   2,684   2,352   12,020 
                     

Net interest income

  19,919   20,260   21,495   22,146   83,820 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  953   4,759   2,619   585   8,916 

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  18,966   15,501   18,876   21,561   74,904 
                     

Noninterest income

  4,495   3,835   4,292   4,221   16,843 

Noninterest expense

  13,334   12,432   14,140   14,659   54,565 
                     

Income before income taxes

  10,127   6,904   9,028   11,123   37,182 

Income taxes

  1,585   1,422   1,801   2,329   7,137 

Net income

 $8,542  $5,482  $7,227  $8,794  $30,045 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.77  $0.50  $0.66  $0.80  $2.74 

Net income - diluted

  0.77   0.50   0.66   0.80   2.73 

Cash dividends

  0.27   0.27   0.27   0.27   1.08 

49

 First Second Third Fourth  
2017Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
          
Interest income$14,681
 $15,603
 $16,274
 $16,480
 $63,038
Interest expense1,547
 1,691
 1,936
 2,117
 7,291
          
Net interest income13,134
 13,912
 14,338
 14,363
 55,747
Provision for loan losses300
 350
 440
 (74) 1,016
Net interest income after provision
 for loan losses
12,834
 13,562
 13,898
 14,437
 54,731
          
Noninterest income3,271
 3,348
 3,804
 3,804
 14,227
Noninterest expense10,441
 10,711
 10,710
 11,021
 42,883
          
Income before income taxes5,664
 6,199
 6,992
 7,220
 26,075
Income taxes1,601
 1,920
 2,205
 5,100
 10,826
Net income$4,063
 $4,279
 $4,787
 $2,120
 $15,249
          
Per common share: 
  
  
  
  
Net income - basic$0.47
 $0.49
 $0.55
 $0.25
 $1.76
Net income - diluted0.47
 0.49
 0.55
 0.25
 1.76
Cash dividends0.24
 0.24
 0.24
 0.25
 0.97
          
  First Second Third Fourth  
2016Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total
          
Interest income$14,171
 $13,769
 $14,063
 $14,167
 $56,170
Interest expense1,587
 1,609
 1,599
 1,521
 6,316
          
Net interest income12,584
 12,160
 12,464
 12,646
 49,854
Provision for loan losses50
 50
 100
 50
 250
Net interest income after provision
 for loan losses
12,534
 12,110
 12,364
 12,596
 49,604
          
Noninterest income3,297
 3,367
 3,120
 3,721
 13,505
Noninterest expense9,918
 9,656
 9,867
 10,360
 39,801
          
Income before income taxes5,913
 5,821
 5,617
 5,957
 23,308
Income taxes1,785
 1,733
 1,654
 1,835
 7,007
Net income$4,128
 $4,088
 $3,963
 $4,122
 $16,301
          
Per common share: 
  
  
  
  
Net income - basic$0.48
 $0.47
 $0.46
 $0.48
 $1.89
Net income - diluted0.48
 0.47
 0.46
 0.48
 1.89
Cash dividends0.24
 0.24
 0.24
 0.24
 0.96

  

First

  

Second

  

Third

  

Fourth

     

2019

 

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Quarter

  

Total

 
                     

Interest income

 $18,096  $25,211  $24,958  $24,590  $92,855 

Interest expense

  3,028   4,222   4,336   4,142   15,728 
                     

Net interest income

  15,068   20,989   20,622   20,448   77,127 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  16   (10)  (12)  462   456 

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  15,052   20,999   20,634   19,986   76,671 
                     

Noninterest income

  3,451   3,682   4,171   3,866   15,170 

Noninterest expense

  10,929   26,316   13,792   15,037   66,074 
                     

Income before income taxes

  7,574   (1,635)  11,013   8,815   25,767 

Income taxes

  1,571   (405)  2,321   1,374   4,861 

Net income

 $6,003  $(1,230) $8,692  $7,441  $20,906 
                     

Per common share:

                    

Net income - basic

 $0.69  $(0.11) $0.78  $0.67  $1.99 

Net income - diluted

  0.69   (0.11)  0.78   0.67   1.98 

Cash dividends

  0.25   0.25   0.27   0.27   1.04 


yhb.gif



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia


Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American National Bankshares Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 9, 201814, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

51

Allowance for Loan Losses Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment Qualitative Factors

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 5 (Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.  The Company’s allowance for loan losses has two basic components, the formula allowance and the specific allowance. At December 31, 2021, the formula allowance represented $18,004,000 of the total allowance for loan losses of $18,678,000. For loans that are not specifically identified for impairment, the formula allowance uses historical loss experience along with various qualitative factors to develop adjusted loss factors for each loan segment.  The qualitative adjustments to the historical loss experience are established by applying a loss percentage to the loan segments identified by management based on their assessment of shared risk characteristics within groups of similar loans. Qualitative factors are determined based on management’s continuing evaluation of inputs and assumptions underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. Management evaluates qualitative factors, primarily considering national, regional and local economic trends and conditions; concentrations of credit; trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, and loss rates; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection, underwriting standards, and lending policies; experience of lending officers, other lending staff and loan review; and legal, regulatory and collateral factors.    

Management exercised significant judgment when assessing the qualitative factors in estimating the allowance for loan losses. We identified the assessment of the qualitative factors as a critical audit matter as auditing the qualitative factors involved especially complex and subjective auditor judgment in evaluating management’s assessment of the inherently subjective estimates. 

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing the effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of qualitative factors, including management's development and review of the data inputs used as the basis for the allocation factors and management's review and approval of the reasonableness of the assumptions used to develop the qualitative adjustments.

● Substantively testing management’s process, including evaluating their judgments and assumptions for developing the qualitative factors, which included:

Evaluating the completeness and accuracy of data inputs used as a basis for the qualitative factors.

Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments related to the determination of qualitative factors.

Evaluating the qualitative factors for directional consistency and for reasonableness.

Testing the mathematical accuracy of the allowance calculation, including the application of the qualitative factors.

/s/ Yount, HydeYOUNT, HYDE & Barbour,BARBOUR, P.C.


We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.


Winchester, Virginia

March 9, 201814, 2022

yhb.gif


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia


Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited American National Bankshares Inc. and Subsidiary’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 9, 201814, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion.


Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’sManagements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Yount, HydeYOUNT, HYDE & Barbour,BARBOUR, P.C.


Winchester, Virginia

March 9, 201814, 2022



American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016

2020

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  

2021

  

2020

 

ASSETS

        

Cash and due from banks

 $23,095  $30,767 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

  487,773   343,603 

Securities available for sale, at fair value

  692,467   466,091 

Restricted stock, at cost

  8,056   8,715 

Loans held for sale

  8,481   15,591 

Loans, net of deferred fees and costs

  1,946,580   2,015,056 

Less allowance for loan losses

  (18,678)  (21,403)

Net loans

  1,927,902   1,993,653 

Premises and equipment, net

  35,564   39,723 

Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance

  143   958 

Goodwill

  85,048   85,048 

Core deposit intangibles, net

  4,627   6,091 

Bank owned life insurance

  29,107   28,482 

Other assets

  32,334   31,288 

Total assets

 $3,334,597  $3,050,010 
         

LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

        

Liabilities:

        

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 $1,009,081  $830,094 

Interest-bearing deposits

  1,881,272   1,781,236 

Total deposits

  2,890,353   2,611,330 

Customer repurchase agreements

  41,128   42,551 

Subordinated debt

  0   7,500 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,232   28,130 

Other liabilities

  20,092   22,605 

Total liabilities

  2,979,805   2,712,116 
         

Commitments and contingencies

          
         

Shareholders' equity:

        

Preferred stock, $5 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding

  0   0 

Common stock, $1 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 10,766,967 shares outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 10,982,367 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020

  10,710   10,926 

Capital in excess of par value

  147,777   154,850 

Retained earnings

  201,380   169,681 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net

  (5,075)  2,437 

Total shareholders' equity

  354,792   337,894 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 $3,334,597  $3,050,010 
ASSETS2017 2016
Cash and due from banks$28,594
 $20,268
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks23,883
 32,939
    
Securities available for sale, at fair value321,337
 346,502
Restricted stock, at cost6,110
 6,224
Loans held for sale1,639
 5,996
    
Loans, net of unearned income1,336,125
 1,164,821
Less allowance for loan losses(13,603) (12,801)
Net loans1,322,522
 1,152,020
    
Premises and equipment, net25,901
 25,439
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance of $147 in 2017 and $192 in 20161,225
 1,328
Goodwill43,872
 43,872
Core deposit intangibles, net1,191
 1,719
Bank owned life insurance18,460
 18,163
Accrued interest receivable and other assets21,344
 24,168
Total assets$1,816,078
 $1,678,638
    
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 
  
Liabilities: 
  
Demand deposits -- noninterest bearing$394,344
 $378,600
Demand deposits -- interest bearing226,914
 209,430
Money market deposits403,024
 283,035
Savings deposits126,786
 120,720
Time deposits383,658
 378,855
Total deposits1,534,726
 1,370,640
    
Short-term borrowings:   
Customer repurchase agreements10,726
 39,166
Other short-term borrowings24,000
 20,000
Long-term borrowings
 9,980
Junior subordinated debt27,826
 27,724
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities10,083
 9,748
Total liabilities1,607,361
 1,477,258
    
Commitments and contingencies

 

    
Shareholders' equity: 
  
Preferred stock, $5 par, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
 
Common stock, $1 par, 20,000,000 shares authorized 8,650,574 shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 8,618,051 shares outstanding at December 31, 20168,604
 8,578
Capital in excess of par value76,179
 75,076
Retained earnings127,010
 119,600
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(3,076) (1,874)
Total shareholders' equity208,717
 201,380
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$1,816,078
 $1,678,638

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015

2019

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Interest and Dividend Income:

            

Interest and fees on loans

 $87,040  $87,700  $82,684 

Interest and dividends on securities:

            

Taxable

  7,309   6,764   7,682 

Tax-exempt

  385   433   777 

Dividends

  464   503   451 

Other interest income

  598   440   1,261 

Total interest and dividend income

  95,796   95,840   92,855 

Interest Expense:

            

Interest on deposits

  3,645   9,729   13,143 

Interest on short-term borrowings

  22   259   650 

Interest on subordinated debt

  203   489   367 

Interest on junior subordinated debt

  1,535   1,543   1,554 

Interest on long-term borrowings

  0   0   14 

Total interest expense

  5,405   12,020   15,728 

Net Interest Income

  90,391   83,820   77,127 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  (2,825)  8,916   456 

Net Interest Income after Provision for (Recovery of) Loan Losses

  93,216   74,904   76,671 

Noninterest Income:

            

Trust and brokerage fees

  6,019   4,789   4,568 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  2,611   2,557   2,866 

Interchange fees

  4,152   3,213   2,964 

Other fees and commissions

  801   712   729 

Mortgage banking income

  4,195   3,514   2,439 

Securities gains, net

  35   814   607 

Income from Small Business Investment Companies

  1,972   270   211 

Income from insurance investments

  1,199   321   328 

Losses on premises and equipment, net

  (885)  (110)  (427)

Other

  932   763   885 

Total noninterest income

  21,031   16,843   15,170 

Noninterest Expense:

            

Salaries and employee benefits

  32,342   29,765   30,015 

Occupancy and equipment

  6,032   5,586   5,417 

FDIC assessment

  864   639   119 

Bank franchise tax

  1,767   1,702   1,644 

Amortization of intangible assets

  1,464   1,637   1,398 

Data processing

  2,958   3,017   2,567 

Software

  1,368   1,454   1,295 

Other real estate owned, net

  131   60   31 

Merger related expenses

  0   0   11,782 

Other

  12,082   10,705   11,806 

Total noninterest expense

  59,008   54,565   66,074 

Income Before Income Taxes

  55,239   37,182   25,767 

Income Taxes

  11,713   7,137   4,861 

Net Income

 $43,526  $30,045  $20,906 

Net Income Per Common Share:

            

Basic

 $4.00  $2.74  $1.99 

Diluted

 $4.00  $2.73  $1.98 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:

            

Basic

  10,873,817   10,981,623   10,531,572 

Diluted

  10,877,231   10,985,790   10,541,337 
 2017 2016 2015
Interest and Dividend Income:     
Interest and fees on loans$55,276
 $47,971
 $46,860
Interest on federal funds sold
 
 6
Interest and dividends on securities: 
  
  
Taxable4,666
 4,454
 4,072
Tax-exempt2,043
 3,135
 3,681
Dividends319
 334
 346
Other interest income734
 276
 204
Total interest and dividend income63,038
 56,170
 55,169
Interest Expense: 
  
  
Interest on deposits5,794
 5,103
 4,811
Interest on short-term borrowings173
 10
 9
Interest on long-term borrowings296
 325
 324
Interest on junior subordinated debt1,028
 878
 760
Total interest expense7,291
 6,316
 5,904
Net Interest Income55,747
 49,854
 49,265
Provision for Loan Losses1,016
 250
 950
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses54,731
 49,604
 48,315
Noninterest Income: 
  
  
Trust fees3,926
 3,791
 3,935
Service charges on deposit accounts2,002
 2,048
 2,066
Other fees and commissions2,895
 2,680
 2,377
Mortgage banking income2,208
 1,713
 1,320
Securities gains, net812
 836
 867
Brokerage fees829
 843
 946
Income from Small Business Investment Companies236
 463
 912
Gains (losses) on premises and equipment, net344
 (9) 11
Other975
 1,140
 853
Total noninterest income14,227
 13,505
 13,287
Noninterest Expense: 
  
  
Salaries19,829
 17,568
 16,554
Employee benefits4,519
 4,264
 4,311
Occupancy and equipment4,487
 4,246
 4,425
FDIC assessment538
 647
 750
Bank franchise tax1,072
 995
 898
Core deposit intangible amortization528
 964
 1,201
Data processing2,014
 1,828
 1,725
Software1,144
 1,143
 1,158
Other real estate owned, net303
 336
 99
Merger related expenses
 
 1,998
Other8,449
 7,810
 7,424
Total noninterest expense42,883
 39,801
 40,543
Income Before Income Taxes26,075
 23,308
 21,059
Income Taxes10,826
 7,007
 6,020
Net Income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
Net Income Per Common Share: 
  
  
Basic$1.76
 $1.89
 $1.73
Diluted$1.76
 $1.89
 $1.73
Average Common Shares Outstanding: 
  
  
Basic8,641,717
 8,611,507
 8,680,502
Diluted8,660,628
 8,621,241
 8,688,450

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015

2019

(Dollars in thousands)

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Net income

 $43,526  $30,045  $20,906 
             

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            
             

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale

  (12,236)  7,213   9,095 

Tax effect

  2,643   (1,557)  (2,005)
             

Reclassification adjustment for gains on sale or call of securities

  (35)  (814)  (274)

Tax effect

  7   176   59 
             

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

  2,068   (2,210)  (1,854)

Tax effect

  (434)  448   394 
             

Change in unfunded pension liability

  590   (413)  (64)

Tax effect

  (115)  77   1 
             

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  (7,512)  2,920   5,352 
             

Comprehensive income

 $36,014  $32,965  $26,258 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
      
Other comprehensive loss: 
  
  
      
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale35
 (5,736) (1,785)
Tax effect(12) 2,007
 626
      
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities(812) (836) (867)
Tax effect284
 293
 303
      
Change in unfunded pension liability(234) 166
 538
Tax effect82
 (58) (189)
      
Other comprehensive loss(657) (4,164) (1,374)
      
Comprehensive income$14,592
 $12,137
 $13,665

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015

2019

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

              

Accumulated

     
      

Capital in

      

Other

  

Total

 
  

Common

  

Excess of

  

Retained

  

Comprehensive

  

Shareholders'

 
  

Stock

  

Par Value

  

Earnings

  

Income (Loss)

  

Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 $8,668  $78,172  $141,537  $(5,835) $222,542 
                     

Net income

  0   0   20,906   0   20,906 

Other comprehensive income

  0   0   0   5,352   5,352 

Issuance of common stock for acquisition (2,361,686 shares)

  2,362   80,108   0   0   82,470 

Issurance of replacement options/restricted stock

  0   870   0   0   870 

Stock repurchased (85,868 shares)

  (86)  (3,060)  0   0   (3,146)

Stock options exercised (37,104 shares)

  37   651   0   0   688 

Vesting of restricted stock (21,747 shares)

  22   (22)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (38,281 shares)

  16   1,525   0   0   1,541 

Cash dividends paid, $1.04 per share

  0   0   (10,965)  0   (10,965)
                     

Balance, December 31, 2019

  11,019   158,244   151,478   (483)  320,258 
                     

Net income

  0   0   30,045   0   30,045 

Other comprehensive income

  0   0   0   2,920   2,920 

Stock repurchased (140,526 shares)

  (141)  (4,840)  0   0   (4,981)

Stock options exercised (2,573 shares)

  3   40   0   0   43 

Vesting of restricted stock (18,487 shares)

  18   (18)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (48,780 shares)

  27   1,424   0   0   1,451 

Cash dividends paid, $1.08 per share

  0   0   (11,842)  0   (11,842)
                     

Balance, December 31, 2020

  10,926   154,850   169,681   2,437   337,894 
                     

Net income

  0   0   43,526   0   43,526 

Other comprehensive loss

  0   0   0   (7,512)  (7,512)

Stock repurchased (265,939 shares)

  (266)  (8,544)  0   0   (8,810)

Stock options exercised (5,346 shares)

  5   84   0   0   89 

Vesting of restricted stock (23,968 shares)

  24   (24)  0   0   0 

Equity based compensation (45,193 shares)

  21   1,411   0   0   1,432 

Cash dividends paid, $1.09 per share

  0   0   (11,827)  0   (11,827)

Balance, December 31, 2021

 $10,710  $147,777  $201,380  $(5,075) $354,792 
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2014$7,872
 $57,650
 $104,594
 $3,664
 $173,780
          
Net income
 
 15,039
 
 15,039
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (1,374) (1,374)
Issuance of common stock (825,586 shares)826
 19,657
 
 
 20,483
Stock repurchased (150,656 shares)(151) (3,355) 
 
 (3,506)
Stock options exercised (42,680 shares)43
 746
 
 
 789
Equity based compensation (15,386 shares)15
 677
 
 
 692
Cash dividends paid, $0.93 per share
 
 (8,068) 
 (8,068)
          
Balance, December 31, 20158,605
 75,375
 111,565
 2,290
 197,835
          
Net income
 
 16,301
 
 16,301
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (4,164) (4,164)
Stock repurchased (51,384 shares)(51) (1,241) 
 
 (1,292)
Stock options exercised (5,784 shares)6
 136
 
 
 142
Vesting of restricted stock5
 (5) 
 
 
Equity based compensation (41,644 shares)13
 811
 
 
 824
Cash dividends paid, $0.96 per share
 
 (8,266) 
 (8,266)
          
Balance, December 31, 20168,578
 75,076
 119,600
 (1,874) 201,380
          
Net income
 
 15,249
 
 15,249
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 (657) (657)
Reclass "stranded" tax effects from tax rate change*
 
 545
 (545) 
Stock options exercised (4,950 shares)5
 108
 
 
 113
Vesting of restricted stock8
 (8) 
 
 
Equity based compensation (27,546 shares)13
 1,003
 
 
 1,016
Cash dividends paid, $0.97 per share
 
 (8,384) 
 (8,384)
Balance, December 31, 2017$8,604
 $76,179
 $127,010
 $(3,076) $208,717

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



American National Bankshares Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015

2019

(Dollars in thousands)

  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

            

Net income

 $43,526  $30,045  $20,906 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  (2,825)  8,916   456 

Depreciation

  2,243   2,188   2,064 

Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments

  (5,236)  (3,812)  (3,387)

Core deposit intangible amortization

  1,464   1,637   1,398 

Net amortization of securities

  1,846   1,186   1,100 

Net gain on sale or call of securities available for sale

  (35)  (814)  (274)

Net change in fair value of equity securities

  0   0   (333)

Gain on sale of loans held for sale

  (4,195)  (3,514)  (2,439)

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

  154,041   155,705   103,760 

Originations of loans held for sale

  (142,736)  (165,755)  (102,708)

Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned

  111   (4)  (120)

Valuation allowance on other real estate owned

  0   0   68 

Net loss on sale, write-down or disposal of premises and equipment

  885   110   427 

Equity based compensation expense

  1,432   1,451   1,541 

Earnings on bank owned life insurance

  (625)  (665)  (630)

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

  808   (640)  1,068 

Net change in other assets

  245   29   11,137 

Net change in other liabilities

  146   (2,387)  (1,354)

Net cash provided by operating activities

  51,095   23,676   32,680 
             

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

            

Proceeds from sales of equity securities

  0   0   445 

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

  561   5,811   29,878 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale

  192,672   208,429   123,915 

Purchases of securities available for sale

  (433,690)  (295,109)  (155,746)

Net change in restricted stock

  659   (85)  (795)

Proceeds from sales of purchased credit impaired loans

  0   4,939   0 

Net decrease (increase) in loans

  73,836   (186,635)  (26,257)

Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment

  2,031   1   0 

Purchases of premises and equipment

  (1,000)  (2,694)  (3,555)

Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned

  704   195   1,289 

Cash paid in bank acquisition

  0   0   (27)

Cash acquired in bank acquisition

  0   0   26,283 

Net cash used in investing activities

  (164,227)  (265,148)  (4,570)
             

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

            

Net change in noninterest-bearing deposits

  178,987   251,488   23,310 

Net change in interest-bearing deposits

  100,114   299,476   (12,241)

Net change in customer repurchase agreements

  (1,423)  2,076   5,232 

Net change in other short-term borrowings

  0   0   (14,883)

Net change in long-term borrowings

  (7,500)  0   (778)

Common stock dividends paid

  (11,827)  (11,842)  (10,965)

Repurchase of common stock

  (8,810)  (4,981)  (3,146)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  89   43   688 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  249,630   536,260   (12,783)
             

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

  136,498   294,788   15,327 
             

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  374,370   79,582   64,255 
             

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

 $510,868  $374,370  $79,582 
 2017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
  
  Provision for loan losses1,016
 250
 950
  Depreciation1,877
 1,892
 1,833
  Net accretion of acquisition accounting adjustments(2,114) (2,318) (3,197)
  Core deposit intangible amortization528
 964
 1,201
  Net amortization of securities1,831
 2,678
 2,720
  Net gain on sale or call of securities(812) (836) (867)
  Gain on sale of loans held for sale(1,765) (1,328) (1,041)
  Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale92,733
 76,928
 57,421
  Originations of loans held for sale(86,611) (78,330) (59,030)
  Net loss (gain) on other real estate owned22
 72
 (185)
  Valuation allowance on other real estate owned143
 156
 86
  Net loss (gain) on sale of premises and equipment(344) 9
 (11)
  Equity based compensation expense1,016
 824
 692
  Net change in bank owned life insurance(297) (505) (510)
  Deferred income tax expense3,471
 882
 1,741
Net change in interest receivable(148) (967) 744
Net change in other assets(379) (1,390) 1,778
Net change in interest payable51
 (32) 16
Net change in other liabilities284
 867
 (118)
Net cash provided by operating activities25,751
 16,117
 19,262
      
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
  
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale55,903
 13,019
 15,425
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale52,397
 140,483
 122,984
Purchases of securities available for sale(84,931) (168,069) (120,040)
Net change in restricted stock114
 (912) (358)
Net increase in loans(170,515) (157,198) (48,318)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment653
 1
 44
Purchases of premises and equipment(2,648) (3,613) (1,474)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned1,171
 923
 2,135
Cash paid in bank acquisition
 
 (5,935)
Cash acquired in bank acquisition
 
 18,173
Net cash used in investing activities(147,856) (175,366) (17,364)
      
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
  
Net change in demand, money market, and savings deposits159,283
 126,435
 70,879
Net change in time deposits4,803
 (18,455) (21,089)
Net change in customer repurchase agreements(28,440) (1,445) (12,869)
Net change in other short-term borrowings4,000
 20,000
 
Net change in long-term borrowings(10,000) 
 
Common stock dividends paid(8,384) (8,266) (8,068)
Repurchase of common stock
 (1,292) (3,506)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options113
 142
 789
Net cash provided by financing activities121,375
 117,119
 26,136
      
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(730) (42,130) 28,034
      
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period53,207
 95,337
 67,303
      
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$52,477
 $53,207
 $95,337

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


American National Bankshares Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 20152019


Note 1Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations and Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American National Bankshares Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly owned subsidiary, American National Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). The Bank offers a wide variety of retail, commercial, secondary market mortgage lending, and trust and investment services which also include non-deposit products such as mutual funds and insurance policies.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, goodwill and intangible assets, unfunded pension liability, other-than-temporary impairment of securities, accounting for merger and acquisition activity, accounting for acquired loans with specific credit-related deterioration, the valuation of other real estate owned ("OREO"), and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

In April 2006, AMNB Statutory Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust (the "AMNB Trust") and an unconsolidated wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing preferred securities (the "Trust Preferred Securities") in a private placement pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration. Proceeds from the securities were used to fund the acquisition of Community First Financial Corporation ("Community First") which occurred in April 2006.

On

In July 1, 2011, the Company completedand in connection with its acquisition of MidCarolina Financial Corporation ("MidCarolina") pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated December 15, 2010, between the Company and MidCarolina.  MidCarolina was headquartered in Burlington, North Carolina, and engaged in banking operations through its subsidiary bank, MidCarolina Bank.  The transaction has expanded the Company's footprint in North Carolina, adding eight branches in Alamance and Guilford Counties.

In July 2011, and in connection with its acquisition of MidCarolina,, the Company assumed liabilities of the MidCarolina Trust I and MidCarolina Trust II, two separate unconsolidated Delaware statutory trusts (the "MidCarolina Trusts"), which were also formed for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. Refer to Note 11 for further details concerning these entities.
On January 1, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. ("MainStreet") pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of August 24, 2014, between the Company and MainStreet (the "MainStreet Merger Agreement"). Immediately after the merger of MainStreet into the Company, Franklin Community Bank, N.A., MainStreet's wholly-owned bank subsidiary ("Franklin Bank"), merged with and into the Bank. Franklin Bank provided banking services to its customers from three banking offices located in Rocky Mount, Hardy, and Union Hall, Virginia.

All significant inter-company transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation, with the exception of the AMNB Trust and the MidCarolina Trusts, as detailed in Note 11.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes cash on hand, cash with correspondent banks, and cash on deposit at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with original maturities of three months or less and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost.

Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Banks

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks mature within one year and are carried at cost.

Securities

Certain debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as "held to maturity" and recorded at amortized cost. Trading securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in


earnings. Securities Debt securities not classified as held to maturity or trading including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are classified as "available for sale" and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities.securities or to the earliest call with premiums. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

The Company does not currently have any securities in held to maturity or trading and has no plans to add any to either category. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1)(1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and, (2)(2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. For equity

59

Equity securities the entire amount of impairment is recognized through earnings.

with readily determinable fair values are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in noninterest income.

Due to the nature and restrictions placed on the Company's investment in common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta ("FHLB") and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, these securities have been classified as restricted equity securities and carried at cost.

Loans Held for Sale

Secondary market mortgage loans are designated as held for sale at the time of their origination. These loans are pre-sold with servicing released and the Company does not retain any interest after the loans are sold. These loans consist primarily of fixed-rate, single-family residential mortgage loans which meet the underwriting characteristics of certain government-sponsored enterprises (conforming loans). In addition, the Company requires a firm purchase commitment from a permanent investor before a loan can be committed, thus limiting interest rate risk. Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. Gains on sales of loans are recognized at the loan closing date and are included in noninterest income.

Derivative Loan Commitments

The Company enters into mortgage loan commitments whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. Loan commitments that are derivatives are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets with net changes in their fair values recorded in other expenses. Derivative loan commitments resulted in no income or loss for 2017, 2016 or 2015.

The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and sale of the loan generally ranges from 30 to 60 days. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery contracts, by committing to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed the interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Company is not generally exposed to significant losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity.

The fair value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts is not readily ascertainable with precision because rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. The Company determines the fair value of rate lock commitments and best efforts contracts by measuring the change in the estimated value of the underlying assets while taking into consideration the probability that the loanloans will be funded.

Loans

The Company makes mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is secured by real estate. The ability of the Company's debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate market and general economic conditions in the Company's market area.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balance adjusted for the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs,


are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method. The accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Loans are typically charged off when the loan is 120 days past due, unless secured and in process of collection. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost recovery method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

A loan is considered past due when a payment of principal or interest or both is due but not paid. Management closely monitors past due loans in timeframes of 30-5930-59 days, 60-8960-89 days, and 90 or more days past due.

These policies apply to all loan portfolio classes and segments.

60

Substandard and doubtful risk graded commercial, commercial real estate, and construction loans equal to or greater than $100,000 are reviewed for impairment. All troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"), regardless of dollar amount, are also evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment and establishing a specific allowance include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate, and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Generally, large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans (residential real estate and consumer loans) are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Company's policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans is consistent with its nonaccrual policy.

The Company's loan portfolio is organized by major segment. These include: commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans. Each segment has particular risk characteristics that are specific to the borrower and the generic category of credit. Commercial loan repayments are highly dependent on cash flows associated with the underlying business and its profitability. They can also be impacted by changes in collateral values. Commercial real estate loans share the same general risk characteristics as commercial loans but are often more dependent on the value of the underlying real estate collateral and, when construction is involved, the ultimate completion of and sale of the project. Residential real estate loans are generally dependent on the value of collateral and the credit worthiness of the underlying borrower. Consumer loans are very similar in risk characteristics to residential real estate.

In connection with the MidCarolina and MainStreet mergers, certain loans were acquired which exhibited deteriorated credit quality since origination and for which the Company does not expect to collect all contractual payments. These purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 310-30,Receivables - Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, and are recorded at the amount paid, such that there is no carryover of the seller's allowance for loan losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses.

Such purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for individually or aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics such as, credit score, loan type, and date of origination. The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each loan or pool, and the expected cash flows in excess of amount paid is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool (accretable yield). The excess of the loan's or pool's contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable difference).

Over the life of the loan or pool, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded as a provision for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial condition, management may grant a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring


("TDRs").TDR. Management strives to identify borrowers in financial difficulty early and work with them to modify their loan to more affordable terms before their loan reaches nonaccrual status. These modified terms may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral. In cases where borrowers are granted new terms that provide for a reduction of either interest or principal, management measures any impairment on the restructuring as noted above for impaired loans. The Company has $1,306,000had $1,725,000 in loans classified as TDRs as of December 31, 20172021 and $2,670,000$1,976,000 as of December 31, 2016.
2020.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of the allowance for loan losses ("ALLL") is to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and by recoveries of previously charged-off loans. Loan charge-offs decrease the allowance.

The goal of the Company is to maintain an appropriate, systematic, and consistently applied process to determine the amounts of the ALLL and the provision for loan loss expense.

The Company uses certain practices to manage its credit risk. These practices include (1)(1) appropriate lending limits for loan officers, (2)(2) a loan approval process, (3)(3) careful underwriting of loan requests, including analysis of borrowers, cash flows, collateral, and market risks, (4)(4) regular monitoring of the portfolio, including diversification by type and geography, (5)(5) review of loans by the Loan Review department, which operates independently of loan production (the Loan Review function consists of a co-sourced arrangement using both internal personnel and external vendors to provide the Company with a more robust review function of the loan portfolio), (6)(6) regular meetings of the Credit Committees to discuss portfolio and policy changes and make decisions on large or unusual loan requests, and (7)(7) regular meetings of the Asset Quality Committee which reviews the status of individual loans.

61

Risk grades are assigned as part of the loan origination process. From time to time risk grades may be modified as warranted by the facts and circumstances surrounding the credit.

Calculation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses is prepared quarterly by the Finance Department. The Company's Credit Committee, Capital ManagementRisk and Compliance Committee, Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors review the allowance for adequacy.

The Company's allowance for loan losses has two basic components: the formula allowance and the specific allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates and judgments.

The formula allowance uses historical loss experience as an indicator of future losses, along with various qualitative factors, including levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in underwriting standards, experience of lending staff, economic conditions, and portfolio concentrations. In the formula allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans, the historical loss rate is combined with the qualitative factors, resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each risk-grade category of loans. The period-end balances for each loan risk-grade category are multiplied by the adjusted loss factor. Allowance calculations for consumer loans are calculated based on historical losses for each product category without regard to risk grade. This loss rate is combined with qualitative factors resulting in an adjusted loss factor for each product category.

The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss for specifically identified impaired loans. These include:

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate.  The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);
The loan's observable market price, or
The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. The effective interest rate on a loan is the rate of return implicit in the loan (that is, the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred loan fees or costs and any premium or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the loan);

The loan's observable market price; or

The fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to dispose, if the loan is collateral dependent.

The use of these computed values is inherently subjective and actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. No single statistic, formula, or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance. Management makes subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, and different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. For analytical purposes, management allocates a portion of the allowance to specific loan categories and specific loans. However, the entire allowance is used to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, including identified and unidentified losses.

The relationships and ratios used in calculating the allowance, including the qualitative factors, may change from period to period as facts and circumstances evolve. Furthermore, management cannot provide assurance that in any particular period the


Company will not have sizeable credit losses in relation to the amount reserved. Management may find it necessary to significantly adjust the allowance, considering current factors at the time.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Premises and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from three years to thirty-nine years; leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is less. Software is generally amortized over three years. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on the straight-line method.

Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of replacing structural parts of major units are considered individually and are expensed or capitalized as the facts dictate. Gains and losses on routine dispositions are reflected in current operations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value based test.  Additionally, acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) are separately recognized if the benefit of the assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their useful lives.  Intangible assets related to branch transactions continued to amortize. The cost of purchased deposit relationships and other intangible assets, based on independent valuation, are being amortized over their estimated lives ranging from eight to ten years.

The Company records as goodwillrepresents the excess of purchase pricethe cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Impairment testing is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. The Company performs its annual analysis as of June 30 each fiscal year. Accounting guidance permits preliminaryGoodwill is not amortized, but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment. Other acquired intangible assets with finite lives (such as core deposit intangibles) are initially recorded at estimated fair value and are amortized over their useful lives. Core deposit and other intangible assets are generally amortized using accelerated methods over their useful lives of qualitative factorsfive to determine whether more substantial impairment testing is required. The Company chose to bypass the preliminary assessment and utilized a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment.  No indicators of impairment were identified during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, or 2015.
ten years.

Trust Assets

Securities and other property held by the trust and investment services segment in a fiduciary or agency capacity are not assets of the Company and are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

62

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned ("OREO")

OREO represents real estate that has been acquired through loan foreclosures or deeds received in lieu of loan payments. Generally, such properties are appraised at the time acquired and are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management, and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in noninterest expense.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

The

In connection with mergers, the Company has acquired bank owned life insurance ("BOLI") in connection with three acquisitions.. The asset is reflected as the cash surrender value of the policies as provided by the insurer on a monthly basis.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1)(1) the assets have been isolated from the Company – put presumptively beyond reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2)(2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3)(3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the balance sheet method to account for deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.


When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-notmore-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company had no liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016.

2020.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock compensation accounting guidance Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") ASC 718, "Compensation –Compensation - Stock Compensation"Compensation, requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The stock compensation accounting guidance covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

The stock compensation accounting guidance requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and recognized over the employees' service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. A Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-averageaverage number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the impact of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company consist solely of outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury method. Nonvested shares of restricted stock are included in the computation of basic earnings per share because the holder has voting rights and shares in non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period.

63

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is shown in a two statement approach; the first statement presents total net income and its components followed by a second statement that presents all the components of other comprehensive income such aswhich include unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges, and changes in the funded status of athe defined benefit postretirement plan.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”)The Company early adopted this new standard in early 2018. ASU 2018-02 requires reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for "stranded" tax effects resulting from the impact of the newly enacted federal corporate income tax rate on items included in AOCI.  The amount of this reclassification in 2017 was $545,000 and is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' equity.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred, and were $352,000, $260,000,$506,000, $453,000, and $356,000$473,000 in 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under ASC 805, "Business Combinations"Business Combinations, using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date measured at their fair values as of that date. To determine the fair values, the Company relies on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the Company identifies the acquirer and the closing date and applies


applicable recognition principles and conditions. Acquisition-related costs are costs the Company incurs to effect a business combination. Those costs include advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Some other examples of costs to the Company include systems conversions, integration planning consultants and advertising costs. The Company accounts for acquisition-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received, with one exception. The costs to issue debt or equity securities is recognized in accordance with other applicable GAAP. These acquisition-related costs have been and will be included within the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Incomeincome classified within the noninterest expense caption.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivatives primarily to manage risk associated with changing interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges of the Company's trust preferred capital notes. The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments at fair value as either an other asset or other liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The effective portion of the gain or loss on the Company's cash flow hedges is reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes, and is reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year. There were no material reclassifications.

Use of Estimates

Recently Adopted Accounting Developments

In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect January 2017, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, goodwill and intangible assets, unfunded pension liability, other-than-temporary impairment of securities, accounting for merger and acquisition activity, accounting for acquired loans with specific credit-related deterioration, the valuation of other real estate owned, and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Adoption of NewFinancial Accounting Standards
During Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the first quarter of 2017, the Company adoptedTest for Goodwill Impairment." ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employer Share-Based Payment Accounting."This ASU2017-04 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, onegoodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in the previous two-step impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the prior requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2,which isrequires an entity to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the recognitionimplied fair value of excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to share-based payments, including tax benefits of dividendsgoodwill with its carrying amount. ASU 2017-04 was effective for the Company on share-based payment awards. Prior to theJanuary 1, 2021. The adoption of ASU 2016-09, such tax consequences were recognized as components of additional paid-in capital. With2017-04 did not have a material effect on the adoption of this ASU, tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized within income tax expense. Company's consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with the adoption provisions of ASU 2016-09, the results for 2016 and 2015 include only the excess tax (expense) benefits attributable to 2016 and 2015 in the amounts of $17,000 and $13,000, respectively.

During February 2018, December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Reporting ComprehensiveSimplifying the Accounting for Income (Topic 220): ReclassificationTaxes." The ASU is expected to reduce cost and complexity related to the accounting for income taxes by removing specific exceptions to general principles in Topic 740 (eliminating the need for an organization to analyze whether certain exceptions apply in a given period) and improving financial statement preparers' application of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”certain income tax-related guidance. This ASU provides financial statement preparers with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in each period in which the effectis part of the change inFASB's simplification initiative to make narrow-scope simplifications and improvements to accounting standards through a series of short-term projects. For public business entities, the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Reform Act"), or portion thereof, is recorded. The amendments are effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Organizations should applyThe adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not have a material effect on the proposed amendments either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Reform Act is recognized. The Company has elected to reclassify the stranded income tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of $545,000 in itsCompany's consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017.statements. 

64

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments2020-01, "Investments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): RecognitionEquity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and MeasurementJoint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815." The ASU is based on a consensus of Financial Assetsthe Emerging Issues Task Force and Financial Liabilities." Theis expected to increase comparability in accounting for these transactions. ASU 2020-01 made targeted improvements to accounting for financial instruments, including providing an entity the ability to measure certain equity securities without a readily determinable fair value at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Among other topics, the amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things: (1) requires equity investments (except those accounted for underclarify that an entity should consider observable transactions that require it to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) requiresaccounting. For public business entities, to usesuch as the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (3) Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and (4) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company, does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)." Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the

commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company has analyzed all leases currently in place and determined the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will 2020-01 did not have a material impacteffect on itsthe Company's consolidated financial statements.
During June 2016,

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,2020-08, "Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables – Nonrefundable fees and Other Costs." This ASU clarifies that an entity should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope of ASC paragraph 310-20-35-33 for each reporting period. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2020-08 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

In December 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 ("Appropriations Act") was passed. Under Section 541 of the Appropriations Act, Congress extended or modified many of the relief programs first created by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ('CARES Act"), including the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") and treatment of certain loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Act did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The aggregate loan balances for the PPP at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, were $12.2 million and $211.3 million. Loan modification balances outstanding at December 31, 2020 were $30.0 million and all remaining modifications expired during 2021 and all loans resumed making normal payments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Other Authoritative Accounting Guidance

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." The amendments in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendmentsFASB has issued multiple updates to ASU 2016-13 as codified in this ASU are effectiveTopic 326, including ASU's 2019-04,2019-05,2019-10,2019-11,2020-02, and 2020-03. These ASUs have provided for various minor technical corrections and improvements to the codification as well as other transition matters. Smaller reporting companies who file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filersand all other entities who do not file with the SEC are required to apply the guidance for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The2022. At the one-time evaluation date, the Company has formedqualified as a committeesmaller reporting company and elected to addressdefer the adoption of the standardstandard. The Company began running parallel simulations with its historical loss model starting in the fourth quarter of 2021 and engaged a third party vendor to assist with the data gathering and analysis. will continue this practice until adoption on January 1, 2023. The Company is currently assessingworking to ensure readiness and compliance with the standard. The Company has engaged with a vendor, validated data, analyzed correlations for forecasting, selected methodologies and begun running parallel models. Management will continue to refine assumptions that impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

During August 2016, the calculation prior to the effective date.

Effective November 25, 2019, the SEC adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 119. SAB 119 updated portions of SEC interpretative guidance to align with ASC 326, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses." It covers topics including (1) measuring current expected credit losses; (2) development, governance, and documentation of a systematic methodology; (3) documenting the results of a systematic methodology; and (4) validating a systematic methodology.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classificationthe Effects of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments", to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows.Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting." The amendments arein this ASU provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. The guidance is effective for public businessall entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Subsequently, in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope." This ASU clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,contract modifications and interim periods within those fiscal years.hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition methodASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 to each period presented. If retrospective application is impractical for somecapture the incremental consequences of the issues addressedscope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the update,discounting transition. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 on contract modifications that change the amendmentsinterest rate used for those issues wouldmargining, discounting, or contract price alignment retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications from any date within the interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be applied prospectivelyissued. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2021-01 to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the earliest date practicable.Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in anbeginning of the interim period. period that includes March 12, 2020, and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-152020-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During January 2017,

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805)2020-06, "Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): ClarifyingAccounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity." The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument and more convertible preferred stock as a single equity instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the Definition of a Business".derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. In addition, the amendment updates the disclosure requirements for convertible instruments to increase the information transparency. For public business entities, excluding smaller reporting companies, the amendments in this ASU clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current implementation guidance in Topic 805, there are three elements of a business - inputs, processes, and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a "set") that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The ASU provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. No disclosures are required at transition.fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-012020-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

65

During January 2017,

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles2021-04, "Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt - GoodwillModifications and OtherExtinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 350)718), and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): SimplifyingIssuer's Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity – Classified Written Call Options (a consensus of the Test for Goodwill Impairment"FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)." The amendments in this ASU simplifyaddresses how an entityissuer should account for modifications or an exchange of freestanding written call options classified as equity that is required to test goodwillnot within the scope of another Topic. For both public and private companies, the ASU is effective for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Instead, under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. Public business entities that are SEC filers should adopt the amendments in this ASU for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Transition is prospective. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-042021-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


During March 2017,

In August 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation 2021- Retirement Benefits06, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 715)205), Financial Services—Depository and Lending (Topic 942), and Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946): ImprovingAmendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No.33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses, and No.33-10835, Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank and Savings and Loan Registrants." This ASU incorporates recent SEC rule changes into the PresentationFASB Codification, including SEC Final Rule Releases No.33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses, and No.33-10835, Update of Net Periodic Pension CostStatistical Disclosures for Bank and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.”Savings and Loan Registrants. The amendments in this ASU require an employer that offers defined benefit pension plans, other postretirement benefit plans, or other types of benefits accounted for under Topic 715is effective upon addition to report the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component. If the other components of net periodic benefit cost are not presented on a separate line or lines, the line item(s) used in the income statement must be disclosed. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization as part of an asset, when applicable. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted.FASB Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-072021-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During March 2017, statements

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, “Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees2021-08, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Other Costs (Subtopic 310‐20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.”Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers." The ASU requires entities to apply Topic 606 to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination. The amendments improve comparability after the business combination by providing consistent recognition and measurement guidance for revenue contracts with customers acquired in thisa business combination and revenue contracts with customers not acquired in a business combination. The ASU shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium. Upon adoption of the standard, premiums on these qualifying callable debt securities will be amortized to the earliest call date. Discounts on purchased debt securities will continue to be accreted to maturity. The amendments areis effective for fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, andincluding interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Upon transition, entitiesyears, beginning after December 15, 2022. Entities should apply the guidance on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoptionamendments prospectively and provide the disclosures required for a change in accounting principle. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2017-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

During May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” The amendments provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718.  The amendments are effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlyearly adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2017-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
During August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” The amendments in this ASU modify the designation and measurement guidance for hedge accounting as well as provide for increased transparency regarding the presentation of economic results on both the financial statements and related footnotes. Certain aspects of hedge effectiveness assessments will also be simplified upon implementation of this update. The amendments are effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period.permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-122021-08 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Restrictions on Cash

The Company is a member of the Federal Reserve System and isprior to March 2020 was required to maintain certain levels of its cash and cash equivalents as reserves based on regulatory requirements. The gross reserve requirement and the required balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was $2.8 million and $2.3 millionwere zero at December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2016,2020, respectively. Due to vault cash that exceeded the gross reserve requirement, the balance to be maintained with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was zero at both year ends.

The Company maintains cash accounts in other commercial banks. The amount on deposit with correspondent institutions at December 31, 20172021 exceeded the insurance limits of the Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFDIC by $239,000. $1,871,000.


Note 3 - Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in securities at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31, 2021

 
  

Amortized

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

     
  

Cost

  

Gains

  

Losses

  

Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $150,751  $0  $1,174  $149,577 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  104,518   993   931   104,580 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  357,981   2,854   4,525   356,310 

State and municipal

  65,939   1,021   488   66,472 

Corporate

  15,450   218   140   15,528 

Total securities available for sale

 $694,639  $5,086  $7,258  $692,467 

The Company had no equity securities at December 31, 2021 or December 31, 2020 but recognized in income $333,000 during 2019.

(Dollars in thousands)

 December 31, 2020 
  

Amortized

  

Unrealized

  

Unrealized

     
  

Cost

  

Gains

  

Losses

  

Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $34,997  $1  $0  $34,998 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  104,092   1,976   45   106,023 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  246,770   6,117   105   252,782 

State and municipal

  57,122   1,979   2   59,099 

Corporate

  13,011   188   10   13,189 

Total securities available for sale

 $455,992  $10,261  $162  $466,091 

66
 December 31, 2017
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$114,246
 $8
 $2,127
 $112,127
Mortgage-backed and CMOs106,163
 293
 1,140
 105,316
State and municipal92,711
 1,262
 347
 93,626
Corporate7,842
 234
 14
 8,062
Equity securities1,383
 823
 
 2,206
Total securities available for sale$322,345
 $2,620
 $3,628
 $321,337

 December 31, 2016
 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$106,379
 $62
 $2,387
 $104,054
Mortgage-backed and CMOs79,917
 514
 938
 79,493
State and municipal145,757
 2,540
 782
 147,515
Corporate13,392
 123
 23
 13,492
Equity securities1,288
 660
 
 1,948
Total securities available for sale$346,733
 $3,899
 $4,130
 $346,502

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in debt securities at December 31, 2017,2021, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following table. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Because mortgage-backed securities have both known principal repayment terms as well as unknown principal repayments due to potential borrower pre-payments, it is difficult to accurately predict the final maturity of these investments. Mortgage-backed securities are shown separately (dollars in thousands):

 Available for Sale
 
Amortized
Cost
 Fair Value
Due in one year or less$11,540
 $11,549
Due after one year through five years102,806
 102,982
Due after five years through ten years73,884
 73,072
Due after ten years26,569
 26,212
Mortgage-backed and CMOs106,163
 105,316
Equity securities1,383
 2,206
 $322,345
 $321,337

  

Available for Sale

 
  

Amortized

     
  

Cost

  

Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 $52,314  $52,315 

Due after one year through five years

  185,555   185,333 

Due after five years through ten years

  84,768   84,381 

Due after ten years

  14,021   14,128 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  357,981   356,310 
  $694,639  $692,467 

Gross realized gains and losses on, and the proceeds from the sale of, securities available for sale were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Realized gains$825
 $844
 $871
Realized losses(13) (8) (4)
Other-than-temporary impairment
 
 

  

For the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Gross realized gains

 $35  $814  $328 

Gross realized losses

  0   0   (54)

Proceeds from sales of securities

  561   5,811   29,878 

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $166,284,000$150,400,000 and $202,577,000$189,791,000 at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law. FHLB


FHLB letters of credit were used as additional collateral in the amounts of $190,700,000$275,000,000 at December 31, 20172021 and $130,700,000$245,000,000 at December 31, 2016.
2020.

Temporarily Impaired Securities

The following table shows estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2017.2021. The reference point for determining when securities are in an unrealized loss position is month-end. Therefore, it is possible that a security's market value exceeded its amortized cost on other days during the past twelve-monthtwelve-month period.

67

Available for sale securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 Total Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Loss
Federal agencies and GSEs$99,133
 $2,127
 $45,474
 $321
 $53,659
 $1,806
Mortgage-backed and CMOs90,806
 1,140
 64,449
 533
 26,357
 607
State and municipal34,550
 347
 27,442
 159
 7,108
 188
Corporate1,529
 14
 495
 5
 1,034
 9
Total$226,018
 $3,628
 $137,860
 $1,018
 $88,158
 $2,610
Federal agencies and GSEs:

  

Total

  

Less than 12 Months

  

12 Months or More

 
  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

 

U.S. Treasury

 $149,577  $1,174  $149,577  $1,174  $0  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  73,640   931   63,042   512   10,598   419 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  253,444   4,525   213,292   3,014   40,152   1,511 

State and municipal

  26,646   488   23,341   354   3,305   134 

Corporate

  7,611   140   7,611   140   0   0 

Total

 $510,918  $7,258  $456,863  $5,194  $54,055  $2,064 

U.S. Treasury: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in 24 government sponsored entities ("GSE")17 U.S. Treasury securities were caused by interest rate increases.normal market fluctuations. None of these securities was in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

Mortgage-backed securities:2021.

Federal agencies and GSEs: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in 53 GSE mortgage-backed securities26 government sponsored entities ("GSEs") were caused by interest rate increases. Sixteennormal market fluctuations. Twelve of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2021.

Mortgage-backed securities: The unrealized losses on the Company's investment in 18 GSE mortgage-backed securities were caused by normal market fluctuations. Four of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual cash flows of those investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the Company's investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

2021.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: The unrealized losslosses associated with one private33 GSE collateralized mortgage obligationobligations ("CMO"CMOs") iswere due to normal market fluctuations. This security has beenFour of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. The contractual cash flows of thosethese investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the Company's investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of theirits amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider thosethe investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

2021.

State and municipal securities: The unrealized losses on 5039 state and municipal securities were caused by normal market fluctuations. Two of these securities were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. These securities are of high credit quality (rated A- or higher), and principal and interest rate increases and not credit deterioration.payments have been made timely. The contractual terms of thosethese investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider thosethese investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

2021.

Corporate securities: The unrealized losses on two3 corporate securities were caused by interest rate increasesnormal market fluctuations and not credit deterioration.None of these securities was in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. These securities are not rated, but the Company conducted thorough internal credit reviews prior to purchase and conducts ongoing quarterly reviews of these companies as well, and the Company's analysis did not indicate the existence of credit loss. The contractual terms of thosethese investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basesbasis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases,basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.


2021.

Due to restrictions placed upon the Bank's common stock investment in the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and FHLB, these securities have been classified as restricted equity securities and carried at cost. These restricted securities are not subject to the investment security classificationsclassification requirements and are included as a separate line item on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The FHLB requires the Bank to maintain stock in an amount equal to 4.25% of outstanding borrowings and a specific percentage of the Bank's total assets. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond requires the Bank to maintain stock with a par value equal to 3.0% of its outstanding capital and an additional 3.0% is on call.consolidated balance sheet. Restricted equity securities consist of Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond stock in the amount of $3,587,000$6,500,000 and $3,559,000$6,458,000 as of December 31, 20172021 and 20162020, respectively, and FHLB stock in the amount of $2,523,000$1,556,000 and $2,665,000$2,257,000 as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

68

The table below shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

 Total Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Loss
Federal agencies and GSEs$89,597
 $2,387
 $89,597
 $2,387
 $
 $
Mortgage-backed and CMOs57,762
 938
 56,076
 911
 1,686
 27
State and municipal47,221
 782
 47,221
 782
 
 
Corporate2,895
 23
 2,895
 23
 
 
Total$197,475
 $4,130
 $195,789
 $4,103
 $1,686
 $27

  

Total

  

Less than 12 Months

  

12 Months or More

 
  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

  

Fair

  

Unrealized

 
  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

  

Value

  

Loss

 

U.S. Treasury

 $21,237  $45  $19,974  $26  $1,263  $19 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  46,640   105   46,640   105   0   0 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  3,456   2   3,456   2   0   0 

State and municipal

  5,990   10   5,990   10   0   0 

Total

 $77,323  $162  $76,060  $143  $1,263  $19 

Other-Than-Temporary-Impaired Securities

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, there were no securities classified as other-than-temporary impaired.

Note 4 – Loans

Loans, excluding loans held for sale, at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Commercial$251,666
 $208,717
Commercial real estate: 
  
Construction and land development123,147
 114,258
Commercial real estate637,701
 510,960
Residential real estate: 
  
Residential209,326
 215,104
Home equity109,857
 110,751
Consumer4,428
 5,031
Total loans$1,336,125
 $1,164,821

  

December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Commercial

 $299,773  $491,256 

Commercial real estate:

        

Construction and land development

  134,221   140,071 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  391,517   373,680 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  731,034   627,569 

Residential real estate:

        

Residential

  289,757   269,137 

Home equity

  93,203   104,881 

Consumer

  7,075   8,462 

Total loans, net of deferred fees and costs

 $1,946,580  $2,015,056 

Commercial includes approximately $12.2 million and $211.3 million in net PPP loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The PPP loan balances at December 31, 2021 and 2020 included $(282,000) and $(4,439,000), respectively, in unamortized net PPP fees. Net deferred loan (fees) costs included in the above loan categories are $463,000$333,000 for 20172021 and $(176,000)$(3,021,000) for 2016.

2020 in all other categories.

Overdraft deposits were reclassified to consumer loans in the amount of $114,000$90,000 and $128,000$59,000 for 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.

Acquired Loans

The outstanding principal balance and the carrying amount of these loans, including ASC 310-30,310-30 loans, included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 2017 2016
Outstanding principal balance$79,523
 $104,172
Carrying amount73,796
 96,487

  

2021

  

2020

 

Outstanding principal balance

 $163,574  $251,730 

Carrying amount

  156,975   241,008 

The outstanding principal balance and related carrying amount of acquiredpurchased credit impaired loans, for which the Company applies ASC 310-30310-30 to account for interest earned, at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

2021

  

2020

 

Outstanding principal balance

 $24,696  $37,417 

Carrying amount

  19,802   30,201 

 2017 2016
Outstanding principal balance$27,876
 $34,378
Carrying amount23,430
 28,669
69

 

The following table presents changes in the accretable yield on acquiredpurchased credit impaired loans, for which the Company applies ASC 310-30,310-30, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 20152019 (dollars in thousands):

 2017 2016 2015
Balance at January 1$6,103
 $7,299
 $1,440
Additions from merger with MainStreet
 
 7,140
Accretion(3,117) (3,232) (4,313)
Reclassification from nonaccretable difference1,006
 2,197
 238
Other changes, net898
 (161) 2,794
Balance at December 31$4,890
 $6,103
 $7,299

  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Balance at January 1

 $6,513  $7,893  $4,633 

Additions from merger with HomeTown

  0   0   4,410 

Accretion

  (5,292)  (3,553)  (3,304)

Reclassification from nonaccretable difference

  2,780   2,233   736 

Other changes, net (1)

  901   (60)  1,418 

Balance at December 31

 $4,902  $6,513  $7,893 

__________________________

(1)  This line item represents changes in the cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of non-credit changes such as prepayment assumptions, changes in interest rates on variable rate acquired impaired loans, and discounted payoffs that occurred in the period.

Past Due Loans

The following table shows an analysis by portfolio segment of the Company's past due loans at December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

 30- 59 Days
Past Due
 60-89 Days
Past Due
 90 Days +
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 Non-
Accrual
Loans
 Total
Past
Due
 Current Total
Loans
Commercial$92
 $
 $
 $90
 $182
 $251,484
 $251,666
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 36
 36
 123,111
 123,147
Commercial real estate86
 
 280
 489
 855
 636,846
 637,701
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential282
 71
 79
 1,343
 1,775
 207,551
 209,326
Home equity141
 16
 
 243
 400
 109,457
 109,857
Consumer21
 5
 
 
 26
 4,402
 4,428
Total$622
 $92
 $359
 $2,201
 $3,274
 $1,332,851
 $1,336,125

          

90 Days +

                 
          

Past Due

  

Non-

  

Total

         
  

30- 59 Days

  

60-89 Days

  

and Still

  

Accrual

  

Past

      

Total

 
  

Past Due

  

Past Due

  

Accruing

  

Loans

  

Due

  

Current

  

Loans

 

Commercial

 $120  $0  $0  $26  $146  $299,627  $299,773 

Commercial real estate:

                            

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0   134,221   134,221 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0   12   12   391,505   391,517 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  0   0   0   1,093   1,093   729,941   731,034 

Residential:

                            

Residential

  670   20   154   792   1,636   288,121   289,757 

Home equity

  12   30   47   80   169   93,034   93,203 

Consumer

  6   0   15   3   24   7,051   7,075 

Total

 $808  $50  $216  $2,006  $3,080  $1,943,500  $1,946,580 

The following table shows an analysis by portfolio segment of the Company's past due loans at December 31, 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

          

90 Days +

                 
          

Past Due

  

Non-

  

Total

         
  

30- 59 Days

  

60-89 Days

  

and Still

  

Accrual

  

Past

      

Total

 
  

Past Due

  

Past Due

  

Accruing

  

Loans

  

Due

  

Current

  

Loans

 

Commercial

 $153  $9  $0  $100  $262  $490,994  $491,256 

Commercial real estate:

                            

Construction and land development

  168   0   0   5   173   139,898   140,071 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  62   0   209   304   575   373,105   373,680 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  0   0   0   1,158   1,158   626,411   627,569 

Residential:

                            

Residential

  711   211   53   792   1,767   267,370   269,137 

Home equity

  0   0   0   69   69   104,812   104,881 

Consumer

  49   14   0   6   69   8,393   8,462 

Total

 $1,143  $234  $262  $2,434  $4,073  $2,010,983  $2,015,056 

70

 30- 59 Days
Past Due
 60-89 Days
Past Due
 90 Days +
Past Due
and Still
Accruing
 Non-
Accrual
Loans
 Total
Past
Due
 Current Total
Loans
Commercial$50
 $
 $
 $19
 $69
 $208,648
 $208,717
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development60
 12
 
 64
 136
 114,122
 114,258
Commercial real estate
 127
 339
 773
 1,239
 509,721
 510,960
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Residential1,280
 117
 248
 1,802
 3,447
 211,657
 215,104
Home equity229
 
 
 289
 518
 110,233
 110,751
Consumer6
 5
 
 18
 29
 5,002
 5,031
Total$1,625
 $261
 $587
 $2,965
 $5,438
 $1,159,383
 $1,164,821

Impaired Loans

The following table presents the Company's impaired loan balances by portfolio segment, excluding acquired impaired loans, at December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:         
Commercial$4
 $4
 $
 $19
 $1
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development
 
 
 56
 4
Commercial real estate791
 789
 
 1,069
 66
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential717
 719
 
 575
 41
Home equity142
 142
 
 109
 10
Consumer5
 5
 
 6
 1
 $1,659
 $1,659
 $
 $1,834
 $123
With a related allowance recorded: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$202
 $201
 $154
 $150
 $16
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development*37
 37
 
 56
 
Commercial real estate*34
 32
 
 126
 11
Residential 
  
  
  
  
Residential1,022
 1,022
 12
 1,174
 27
Home equity263
 261
 1
 251
 1
Consumer*
 
 
 5
 
 $1,558
 $1,553
 $167
 $1,762
 $55
Total: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$206
 $205
 $154
 $169
 $17
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development37
 37
 
 112
 4
Commercial real estate825
 821
 
 1,195
 77
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential1,739
 1,741
 12
 1,749
 68
Home equity405
 403
 1
 360
 11
Consumer5
 5
 
 11
 1
 $3,217
 $3,212
 $167
 $3,596
 $178
*Allowance is reported as zero in the table due to presentation in thousands and rounding.

      

Unpaid

      

Average

  

Interest

 
  

Recorded

  

Principal

  

Related

  

Recorded

  

Income

 
  

Investment

  

Balance

  

Allowance

  

Investment

  

Recognized

 

With no related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $0  $0  $  $4  $0 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  8   5      71   1 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  1,185   1,186      1,107   23 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,021   1,031      1,217   41 

Home equity

  4   4      5   1 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $2,218  $2,226  $  $2,404  $66 

With a related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $14  $7  $7  $25  $1 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  0   0   0   30   0 

Residential

                    

Residential

  0   0   0   61   2 

Home equity

  0   0   0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $14  $7  $7  $116  $3 

Total:

                    

Commercial

 $14  $7  $7  $29  $1 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0   0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  8   5   0   71   1 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  1,185   1,186   0   1,137   23 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,021   1,031   0   1,278   43 

Home equity

  4   4   0   5   1 

Consumer

  0   0   0   0   0 
  $2,232  $2,233  $7  $2,520  $69 

In the table above, recorded investment may exceedbe different than unpaid principal balance due to acquired loans with a premium or discount and loans wherewith unearned costs exceedor unearned fees.

71


The following table presents the Company's impaired loan balances by portfolio segment, excluding acquired impaired loans, at December 31, 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

 Recorded
Investment
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Related
Allowance
 Average
Recorded
Investment
 Interest
Income
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:         
Commercial$24
 $24
 $
 $12
 $2
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development158
 157
 
 198
 16
Commercial real estate1,916
 1,917
 
 1,409
 107
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential557
 567
 
 318
 38
Home equity6
 6
 
 153
 16
Consumer9
 9
 
 10
 1
 $2,670
 $2,680
 $
 $2,100
 $180
With a related allowance recorded: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial*$19
 $19
 $
 $78
 $1
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development*64
 65
 
 272
 10
Commercial real estate*48
 48
 
 286
 7
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential1,639
 1,639
 22
 1,593
 32
Home equity386
 385
 1
 345
 4
Consumer*18
 18
 
 14
 
 $2,174
 $2,174
 $23
 $2,588
 $54
Total: 
  
  
  
  
Commercial$43
 $43
 $
 $90
 $3
Commercial real estate: 
  
  
  
  
Construction and land development222
 222
 
 470
 26
Commercial real estate1,964
 1,965
 
 1,695
 114
Residential: 
  
  
  
  
Residential2,196
 2,206
 22
 1,911
 70
Home equity392
 391
 1
 498
 20
Consumer27
 27
 
 24
 1
 $4,844
 $4,854
 $23
 $4,688
 $234
*Allowance is reported as zero in the table due to presentation in thousands and rounding.

      

Unpaid

      

Average

  

Interest

 
  

Recorded

  

Principal

  

Related

  

Recorded

  

Income

 
  

Investment

  

Balance

  

Allowance

  

Investment

  

Recognized

 

With no related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $18  $18  $  $23  $6 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  286   283      357   27 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  1,148   1,147      766   75 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,096   1,103      912   62 

Home equity

  6   6      31   3 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $2,554  $2,557  $  $2,089  $173 

With a related allowance recorded:

                    

Commercial

 $39  $33  $29  $382  $15 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  122   122      180   15 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  137   137   1   256   9 

Home equity

  0   0      0   0 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $298  $292  $30  $818  $39 

Total:

                    

Commercial

 $57  $51  $29  $405  $21 

Commercial real estate:

                    

Construction and land development

  0   0      0   0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  286   283      357   27 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  1,270   1,269      946   90 

Residential:

                    

Residential

  1,233   1,240   1   1,168   71 

Home equity

  6   6      31   3 

Consumer

  0   0      0   0 
  $2,852  $2,849  $30  $2,907  $212 

In the table above, recorded investment may exceedbe different than unpaid principal balance due to acquired loans with a premium or discount and loans wherewith unearned costs exceedor unearned fees.

72


The following table shows the detail of loans modified as TDRs during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, included in the impaired loan balances (dollars in thousands):

 Loans Modified as a TDR for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial5
 $212
 $212
Commercial real estate
 
 
Home equity2
 57
 57
Residential real estate1
 36
 36
Consumer
 
 
Total8
 $305
 $305
 Loans Modified as a TDR for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial2
 $24
 $24
Commercial real estate2
 1,005
 1,003
Home equity
 
 
Residential real estate4
 322
 312
Consumer
 
 
Total8
 $1,351
 $1,339
 Loans Modified as a TDR for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Number of
Contracts
 Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
 Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded
Investment
Commercial
 $
 $
Commercial real estate3
 394
 394
Home equity1
 107
 105
Residential real estate4
 596
 583
Consumer
 
 
Total8
 $1,097
 $1,082

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2021

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  0  $0  $0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  1   1,093   1,093 

Residential real estate

  0   0   0 

Home equity

  0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  1  $1,093  $1,093 

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2020

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  1  $106  $106 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  2   1,311   1,311 

Residential real estate

  1   82   82 

Home equity

  1   6   6 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  5  $1,505  $1,505 

  

Loans Modified as TDRs for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

 
      

Pre-Modification

  

Post-Modification

 
  

Number of

  

Outstanding Recorded

  

Outstanding Recorded

 
  

Contracts

  

Investment

  

Investment

 

Commercial

  0  $0  $0 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied

  0   0   0 

Residential real estate

  1   207   207 

Home equity

  0   0   0 

Consumer

  0   0   0 

Total

  1  $207  $207 

All loans modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31,2021,2020, and 2019 were structure modifications. There was no impact to the allowance for loan losses for the 1 commercial real estate-non-owner occupied TDR in 2021. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan modified as a TDR in 2020 was $88,000. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for one of the commercial real estate - non-owner occupied loans modified as a TDR in 2020 was $138,000; there was no impact on the allowance for loan losses for the other commercial real estate - non-owner occupied loan. There was no impact on the allowance for loan losses for the residential real estate loan and the home equity loan modified as TDRs in 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the impact on the allowance was due to specific reserves that were charged-off prior to year-end. The impact on the allowance for loan losses for the residential real estate loan modified as a TDR in 2019 was $24,000. 

During the years ended December 31,2021 and 2019, the Company had no loans that subsequently defaulted within 12 months of modification. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were three2020, the Company had one commercial loans with a total recorded investment of $109,000 and one residential real estate - non-owner occupied loan with a recorded investment of $143,000 that defaulted within twelve months of modification. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no loans$1,052,000 that subsequently defaulted within twelve12 months of modification. The Company defines default as one or more payments that occur more than 90 days past the due date, charge-off, or foreclosure subsequent to modification. Any charge-offs resulting in default were adjusted through the allowance for loan losses.

73


The following table summarizes loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial and residential real estate loans, commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses, construction and land development loans, and home equity loans. At December 31, 2021, the primary reason certain loan modifications were classified as TDRscommercial real estate portfolio included concentrations of $81,241,000, $46,049,000 and includes newly designated TDRs as well as modifications made to existing TDRs. Rate modifications include TDRs made with below market interest rates that also include modifications$204,655,000 in hotel, restaurants, and retail, respectively. The concentrations total 17.1% of loan structures (dollarstotal loans, excluding loans in thousands):process.

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 Type of Modification ALLL Type of Modification ALLL Type of Modification ALLL
 Rate Structure Impact Rate Structure Impact Rate Structure Impact
Commercial$
 $212
 $137
 $
 $24
 $
 $
 $
 $
Commercial real estate
 
 
 
 1,003
 
 
 394
 
Home equity
 57
 1
 
 
 
 105
 
 1
Residential real estate
 36
 
 
 312
 1
 
 583
 19
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total$
 $305
 $138
 $
 $1,339
 $1
 $105
 $977
 $20
The Company had $463,000$102,500 and $387,000 in residential real estate loans in the process of foreclosure at December 31, 20172021 and $629,000December 31,2020, respectively, and $653,000had $0 and $285,000 in residential OREO at December 31, 20172021 and December 31, 2016,2020, respectively.

Risk Ratings

The following table showstables show the Company's loan portfolio broken down by internal risk grading as of December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

Commercial and Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

 Commercial Construction and Land Development 
Commercial Real Estate
 Residential Real Estate 
Home Equity
Pass$248,714
 $114,502
 $625,861
 $200,405
 $107,705
Special Mention1,763
 7,114
 6,914
 4,438
 1,325
Substandard1,189
 1,531
 4,926
 4,483
 827
Doubtful
 
 
 
 
Total$251,666
 $123,147
 $637,701
 $209,326
 $109,857

  

Commercial

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Home Equity

 

Pass

 $290,823  $130,111  $372,177  $720,138  $285,188  $92,807 

Special Mention

  8,333   2,881   11,048   8,702   1,774   0 

Substandard

  617   1,229   8,292   2,194   2,795   396 

Doubtful

  0   0   0   0   0   0 

Total

 $299,773  $134,221  $391,517  $731,034  $289,757  $93,203 

Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity

 Consumer
Performing$4,415
Nonperforming13
Total$4,428

  

Consumer

 

Performing

 $7,057 

Nonperforming

  18 

Total

 $7,075 

Loans classified in the Pass category typically are fundamentally sound, and risk factors are reasonable and acceptable.

Loans classified in the Special Mention category typically have been criticized internally, by loan review or the loan officer, or by external regulators under the current credit policy regarding risk grades.

Loans classified in the Substandard category typically have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt; they are typically characterized by the possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Loans classified in the Doubtful category typically have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard, plus the added characteristic the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions,


and values highly questionable and improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur that may salvage the debt.

Consumer loans are classified as performing or nonperforming. A loan is nonperforming when payments of interest and principal are past due 90 days or more, or payments are less than 90 days past due, but there are other good reasons to doubt that payment will be made in full.more.

74

The following table showstables show the Company's loan portfolio broken down by internal risk grading as of December 31, 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

Commercial and Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

 Commercial Construction and Land Development Commercial
Real Estate
 Residential Real Estate Home
Equity
Pass$208,098
 $112,729
 $501,081
 $199,278
 $108,799
Special Mention592
 902
 4,859
 10,600
 1,257
Substandard27
 627
 5,020
 5,226
 695
Doubtful
 
 
 
 
Total$208,717
 $114,258
 $510,960
 $215,104
 $110,751

  

Commercial

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Home Equity

 

Pass

 $479,416  $131,770  $350,376  $612,688  $262,677  $104,608 

Special Mention

  10,956   2,505   14,621   9,196   3,665   0 

Substandard

  865   5,796   8,474   5,563   2,795   273 

Doubtful

  19   0   209   122   0   0 

Total

 $491,256  $140,071  $373,680  $627,569  $269,137  $104,881 

Consumer Credit Exposure

Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity

  

Consumer

 

Performing

 $8,456 

Nonperforming

  6 

Total

 $8,462 

 Consumer
Performing$5,003
Nonperforming28
Total$5,031

Note 5 – Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

Changes in the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments (included in other liabilities) for each of the years in the three-yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2017,2021, are presented below (dollars in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

            

Balance, beginning of year

 $21,403  $13,152  $12,805 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

  (2,825)  8,916   456 

Charge-offs

  (146)  (1,006)  (333)

Recoveries

  246   341   224 

Balance, end of year

 $18,678  $21,403  $13,152 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

            

Balance, beginning of year

 $304  $329  $217 

Provision for (recovery of) unfunded commitments

  82   (25)  112 

Charge-offs

  0   0   0 

Balance, end of year

 $386  $304  $329 

75

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Allowance for Loan Losses     
Balance, beginning of year$12,801
 $12,601
 $12,427
Provision for loan losses1,016
 250
 950
Charge-offs(690) (326) (1,200)
Recoveries476
 276
 424
Balance, end of year$13,603
 $12,801
 $12,601
      
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments 
  
  
Balance, beginning of year$203
 $184
 $163
Provision for unfunded commitments3
 19
 21
Charge-offs
 
 
Balance, end of year$206
 $203
 $184

The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included in other liabilities, and the provision for (recovery of) unfunded commitments is included in noninterest expense. The following table presents the Company's allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and the related loan balance total by segment for the year ended December 31, 20172021 (dollars in thousands):

  Commercial 
Commercial Real Estate
 
Residential Real Estate
 Consumer Unallocated Total
Allowance for Loan Losses           
Balance at December 31, 2016$2,095
 $7,355
 $3,303
 $48
 $
 $12,801
Charge-offs(282) (93) (172) (143) 
 (690)
Recoveries223
 60
 85
 108
 
 476
Provision377
 999
 (391) 31
 
 1,016
Balance at December 31, 2017$2,413
 $8,321
 $2,825
 $44
 $
 $13,603
            
Balance at December 31, 2017: 
  
  
  
  
  
            
Allowance for Loan Losses 
  
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$154
 $
 $13
 $
 $
 $167
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,259
 8,203
 2,645
 44
 
 13,151
Acquired impaired loans
 118
 167
 
 
 285
Total$2,413
 $8,321
 $2,825
 $44
 $
 $13,603
            
Loans 
  
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$206
 $862
 $2,144
 $5
 $
 $3,217
Collectively evaluated for impairment251,185
 747,819
 306,066
 4,408
 
 1,309,478
Acquired impaired loans275
 12,167
 10,973
 15
 
 23,430
Total$251,666
 $760,848
 $319,183
 $4,428
 $
 $1,336,125

  

Commercial (1)

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Consumer

  

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $3,373  $1,927  $4,340  $7,626  $4,067  $70  $21,403 

Charge-offs

  0   0   (3)  0   (53)  (90)  (146)

Recoveries

  40   0   7   8   99   92   246 

Provision recovery

  (745)  (530)  (380)  (493)  (655)  (22)  (2,825)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $2,668  $1,397  $3,964  $7,141  $3,458  $50  $18,678 
                             

Balance at December 31, 2021:

                            
                             

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $7  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $7 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  2,642   1,365   3,767   6,778   3,402   50   18,004 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  19   32   197   363   56   0   667 

Total

 $2,668  $1,397  $3,964  $7,141  $3,458  $50  $18,678 
                             

Loans

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $14  $0  $8  $1,185  $1,025  $0  $2,232 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  299,470   133,984   382,562   724,180   377,290   7,060   1,924,546 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  289   237   8,947   5,669   4,645   15   19,802 

Total

 $299,773  $134,221  $391,517  $731,034  $382,960  $7,075  $1,946,580 

__________________________

(1) Includes PPP loans, which are guaranteed by the SBA and have 0 related allowance.

The following table presents the Company's allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and the related loan balance total by segment for the year ended December 31, 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

  

Commercial (1)

  

Construction and Land Development

  

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied

  

Commercial Real Estate - Non-owner Occupied

  

Residential Real Estate

  

Consumer

  

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $2,657  $1,161  $2,474  $3,781  $3,023  $56  $13,152 

Charge-offs

  (505)  0   (17)  (165)  (117)  (202)  (1,006)

Recoveries

  65   2   12   50   85   127   341 

Provision

  1,156   764   1,871   3,960   1,076   89   8,916 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $3,373  $1,927  $4,340  $7,626  $4,067  $70  $21,403 
                             

Balance at December 31, 2020:

                            
                             

Allowance for Loan Losses

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $29  $0  $0  $0  $1  $0  $30 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  3,318   1,927   4,138   7,185   3,896   70   20,534 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  26   0   202   441   170   0   839 

Total

 $3,373  $1,927  $4,340  $7,626  $4,067  $70  $21,403 
                             

Loans

                            

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $57  $0  $286  $1,270  $1,239  $0  $2,852 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  490,736   139,833   360,579   616,498   365,967   8,390   1,982,003 

Purchased credit impaired loans

  463   238   12,815   9,801   6,812   72   30,201 

Total

 $491,256  $140,071  $373,680  $627,569  $374,018  $8,462  $2,015,056 

(1) Includes PPP loans, which are guaranteed by the SBA and have 0 related allowance.

76

 Commercial 
Commercial Real Estate
 
Residential Real Estate
 Consumer Unallocated Total
Allowance for Loan Losses           
Balance at December 31, 2015$2,065
 $6,930
 $3,546
 $60
 $
 $12,601
Charge-offs(40) (10) (87) (189) 
 (326)
Recoveries40
 32
 68
 136
 
 276
Provision30
 403
 (224) 41
 
 250
Balance at December 31, 2016$2,095
 $7,355
 $3,303
 $48
 $
 $12,801
            
Balance at December 31, 2016: 
  
  
  
  
  
            
Allowance for Loan Losses 
  
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$
 $
 $23
 $
 $
 $23
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,087
 7,248
 3,046
 48
 
 12,429
Acquired impaired loans8
 107
 234
 
 
 349
Total$2,095
 $7,355
 $3,303
 $48
 $
 $12,801
            
Loans 
  
  
  
  
  
Individually evaluated for impairment$43
 $2,186
 $2,588
 $27
 $
 $4,844
Collectively evaluated for impairment208,258
 610,462
 307,600
 4,988
 
 1,131,308
Acquired impaired loans416
 12,570
 15,667
 16
 
 28,669
Total$208,717
 $625,218
 $325,855
 $5,031
 $
 $1,164,821

The allowance for loan losses is allocated to loan segments based upon historical loss factors, risk grades on individual loans, portfolio analysis of smaller balance, homogenous loans, and qualitative factors. Qualitative factors include trends in delinquencies, nonaccrual loans, and loss rates; trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in risk selection, underwriting standards, and lending policies; experience of lending officers, other lending staff and loan review; national, regional, and local economic trends and conditions; legal, regulatory and collateral factors; and concentrations of credit.

The provision for loan losses for the 2020 period reflected an increase in the allowance based on a qualitative assessment of the declining and uncertain economic landscape in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sharp declines in employment, gross national product, housing and auto sales, housing starts and business activity in general indicated a higher risk of probable losses in the Bank's loan portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded a negative provision (recovery) as the credit issues anticipated in 2020 did not materialize and the economic landscape improved substantially. Management will continue to evaluate the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses as more economic data becomes available and as changes within the Company's loan portfolio are known. The effects of the pandemic may require further changes in the level of allowance.

Note 6 – Premises and Equipment

Major classifications of premises and equipment at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Land$6,583
 $6,891
Buildings26,713
 25,616
Leasehold improvements981
 1,078
Furniture and equipment17,677
 16,372
 51,954
 49,957
Accumulated depreciation(26,053) (24,518)
Premises and equipment, net$25,901
 $25,439

  

December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Land

 $10,084  $10,267 

Buildings

  33,262   36,173 

Leasehold improvements

  1,524   1,160 

Furniture and equipment

  18,494   19,424 
   63,364   67,024 

Accumulated depreciation

  (27,800)  (27,301)

Premises and equipment, net

 $35,564  $39,723 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 20152019 was $1,877,000, $1,892,000,$2,243,000, $2,188,000, and $1,833,000,$2,064,000, respectively.


The Company has entered into operating leases for several of its branch and ATM facilities.  The minimum annual rental payments under these leases at December 31, 2017 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 Minimum Lease
YearPayments
2018$726
2019215
202036
202113
20227
2023 and after15
 $1,012
Lease expense, a component of occupancy and equipment expense, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $961,000, $897,000, and $990,000, respectively.

Note 7 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company records as goodwill the excessfair value of purchase pricethe consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Impairment testing is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. TheIn testing goodwill for impairment, the Company performsmust first decide if circumstances lead to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its annual analysis ascarrying value. If, after assessing, it concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of June 30 each fiscal year. Accounting guidance permits preliminary assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether more substantial impairmenta reporting unit is greater than its carrying value, then no further testing is required. Therequired and the goodwill is not impaired. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company chose to bypassdetermined a triggering event had occurred and evaluated goodwill each of the preliminary assessmentfour quarters of 2020 and utilized a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment.  Nono indicators of impairment were identified duringnoted. The Company performed its annual analysis for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, or 2015.

Core deposit intangibles resulting from the Community First acquisition in April 20062021 and 2020, respectively, and no indications of impairment were $3,112,000 and were amortized over 99 months ending in 2015. noted.

Core deposit intangibles resulting from the MidCarolina acquisition in July 2011 were $6,556,000 and are beingbecame fully amortized on an accelerated basis over 108 months. at June 30, 2020. Core deposit intangibles resulting from the MainStreet Bankshares, Inc. acquisition in January 2015 were $1,839,000 and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 120 months.

Core deposit intangibles resulting from the acquisition of HomeTown Bankshares Corporation ("Hometown") in April 2019 were $8,200,000 and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 120 months.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and intangibles for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2021, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Goodwill

  

Intangibles

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $85,048  $6,091 

Amortization

     (1,464)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $85,048  $4,627 

77

 Goodwill Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2016$43,872
 $1,719
Amortization
 (528)
Balance at December 31, 2017$43,872
 $1,191

Goodwill and intangible assets at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 are as followfollows (dollars in thousands):

 
Gross Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Value
December 31, 2017     
Core deposit intangibles$11,508
 $(10,317) $1,191
Goodwill43,872
 
 43,872
      
December 31, 2016 
  
  
Core deposit intangibles$11,508
 $(9,789) $1,719
Goodwill43,872
 
 43,872

  

Gross Carrying

  

Accumulated

  

Net Carrying

 
  

Value

  

Amortization

  

Value

 

December 31, 2021

            

Core deposit intangibles

 $19,708  $(15,081) $4,627 

Goodwill

  85,048      85,048 
             

December 31, 2020

            

Core deposit intangibles

 $19,708  $(13,617) $6,091 

Goodwill

  85,048      85,048 

Amortization expense of core deposit intangibles for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015 were $528,000, $964,000,2019 was $1,464,000, $1,637,000, and $1,201,000,$1,398,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2021, the estimated future amortization expense of core deposit intangibles is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year

 

Amount

 

2022

 $1,260 

2023

  1,069 

2024

  800 

2025

  617 

2026

  881 

Total

 $4,627 

Note 8 – Leases

The right-of-use assets and lease liabilities relate to banking offices and other space occupied by the Company under noncancelable operating lease agreements. The aggregate right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. Cash flows are discounted at the Company's incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease. Right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and are calculated as the sum of the lease liability and if applicable, prepaid rent, initial direct costs and any incentives received from the lessor.

The Company's long-term lease agreements are classified as operating leases. Certain of these leases offer the option to extend the lease term, and the Company has included such extensions in its calculation of the lease liabilities to the extent the options are reasonably certain of being exercised. The lease agreements do not provide for residual value guarantees and have no restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

The following tables present information about the Company's leases as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31,2021,2020 and 2019 (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31, 2021

  

December 31, 2020

 

Lease liabilities

 $4,023  $4,940 

Right-of-use assets

 $3,939  $4,878 

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

  6.92   7.33 

Weighted average discount rate

  3.09%  3.03%

  

Year Ended December 31, 2021

  

Year Ended December 31, 2020

  

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Lease cost

            

Operating lease cost

 $1,069  $993  $1,040 

Short-term lease cost

  0   3   3 

Total lease cost

 $1,069  $996  $1,043 
             

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

 $1,047  $959  $1,013 

78

YearAmount
2018$265
2019219
2020207
2021197
2022155
2023 and after148
Total$1,191

A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total of operating lease liabilities is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Lease payments due

 

As of December 31, 2021

 

2022

 $1,043 

2023

  944 

2024

  514 

2025

  471 

2026

  260 

2027 and after

  1,289 

Total undiscounted cash flows

 $4,521 

Discount

  (498)

Lease liabilities

 $4,023 

Lease expense, a component of occupancy and equipment expense, for the years ended December 31,2021,2020, and 2019 totaled $1,257,000, $1,158,000, and $1,187,000, respectively. The amounts recognized in lease expense include insurance, property taxes, and common area maintenance.

Note 89 - Deposits

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $250,000$250,000 or more at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 was $162,781,000 and $142,527,000, $159,826,000 and $170,089,000, respectively.

At December 31, 2017,2021, the scheduled maturities and amounts of certificates of deposits (included in "time"interest-bearing deposits on the Consolidated Balance Sheet)consolidated balance sheets) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

YearAmount
2018$157,040
201946,070
202033,711
202188,504
202252,319
2023 and after6,014
Total$383,658

Year

 

Amount

 

2022

 $246,629 

2023

  42,269 

2024

  17,182 

2025

  13,904 

2026

  28,259 

2027 and after

  6,460 

Total

 $354,703 

There were no brokered time deposits at December 31, 20172021 or December 31, 2016.2020. Time deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service ("CDARS") program totaled $25,838,000$550,000 at December 31, 20172021 compared to $23,445,000$4,342,000 at December 31, 2016.2020. Deposits through the CDARS program are generated from major customers with substantial relationships towith the Bank.

Note 910 – Short-term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of customer repurchase agreements, and overnight borrowings from the FHLB.FHLB, and federal funds purchased. The Company has federal funds lines of credit established with two correspondent banks in the amountsamount of $15,000,000 each,$60,000,000 and additionally, has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond's discount window. Customer repurchase agreements are collateralized by securities of the U.S. Government, its agencies or GSEs. They mature daily. The interest rates are generally fixed but may be changed at the discretion of the Company. The securities underlying these agreements remain under the Company's control. FHLB overnight borrowings contain floating interest rates that may change daily at the discretion of the FHLB. Short-term borrowings consisted solely of the following at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31, 2021

  

December 31, 2020

 
  

Amount

  Weighted Average Rate  

Amount

  Weighted Average Rate 

Customer repurchase agreements

 $41,128   0.03% $42,551   0.13%

79

 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Amount 
Weighted
Average
Rate
 Amount 
Weighted
Average
Rate
Customer repurchase agreements$10,726
 0.01% $39,166
 0.01%
Other short-term borrowings24,000
 1.59% 20,000
 0.80%
   Total short-term borrowings$34,726
   $59,166
  

Note 1011 – Long-term Borrowings

Under the terms of its collateral agreement with the FHLB, the Company provides a blanket lien covering all of its residential first mortgage loans, second mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, and commercial real estate loans. In addition, the Company pledges as collateral its capital stock in the FHLB and deposits with the FHLB. The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 30% of the Company's assets, subject to the amount of collateral pledged. As of December 31, 2017, $511,621,0002021, $1,051,176,000 in eligible collateral was pledged under the blanket floating lien agreement which covers both short-term and long-term borrowings.

There were no FHLB long-term borrowings as of December 31,2021 or 2020. The Company had Junior Subordinated debt at December 31, 2017. Long-term borrowings2021 and 2020, as of December 31, 2016 consisted of the following fixed-rate advance (dollars in thousands):

 2016
Due by
Advance Amount
 
Weighted Average Rate
November 30, 2017$9,980
 2.98%
    
noted below.

In the regular course of conducting its business, the Company takes deposits from political subdivisions of the states of Virginia and North Carolina. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Bank's public deposits totaled $265,543,000.$326,595,000. The Company is required to provide collateral to secure the deposits that exceed the insurance coverage provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.FDIC. This collateral can be provided in the form of certain types of government or agency bonds or letters of credit from the FHLB. At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had $190,700,000$275,000,000 in letters of credit with the FHLB outstanding as well as $114,183,000$96,495,000 in agency, state, and municipal securities to provide collateral for such deposits.

Note 11 –

Subordinated Debt

On April 1, 2019, in connection with the HomeTown merger, the Company assumed $7,500,000 in aggregate principal amount of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes issued to various institutional accredited investors. A fair value adjustment of $30,000 was recorded on the subordinated debt as a result of the acquisition and was amortized into interest expense through December 30, 2020. The notes had a maturity date of December 30,2025 and had an annual fixed interest rate of 6.75% until December 30, 2020. Thereafter, the notes had a floating interest rate based on LIBOR. Interest was paid semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 30 of each year during the fixed interest rate period. Interest was paid quarterly, in arrears, on March 30, June 30, September 30, and December 30 throughout the floating interest rate period. This debt was paid in full and the notes were redeemed on June 30, 2021.

Junior Subordinated Debt

On April 7, 2006, AMNB Statutory Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $20,000,000 of preferred securities in a private placement pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration. The Trust Preferred Securities mature on June 30,2036, but may be redeemed at the Company's option beginning on September 30, 2011. Initially, the securities required quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the Trust Preferred Securities at a fixed rate of 6.66%. Effective September 30, 2011, the rate resets quarterly at the three-monththree-month LIBOR plus 1.35%. Distributions are cumulative and will accrue from the date of original issuance but may be deferred by the Company from time to time for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods. The Company has guaranteed the payment of all required distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities. The proceeds of the Trust Preferred Securities received by the trust, along with proceeds of $619,000 received by the trust from the issuance of common securities by the trust to the Company, were used to purchase $20,619,000 of the Company's junior subordinated debt securities (the "Trust Preferred Capital Notes"), issued pursuant to a junior subordinated debenturesdebenture entered into between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. The proceeds of the Trust Preferred Capital NotesSecurities were used to fund the cash portion of the merger consideration to the former shareholders of Community First in connection with the Company's acquisition of that company, and for general corporate purposes.

On July 1, 2011, in connection with the MidCarolina merger, the Company assumed $8,764,000 in junior subordinated debentures to the MidCarolina Trusts, to fully and unconditionally guarantee the preferred securities issued by the MidCarolina Trusts. These long-term obligations, which currently qualify as Tier 1 capital, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the MidCarolina Trusts' obligations. The MidCarolina Trusts are not consolidated in the Company's financial statements.

In accordance with ASC 810-10-15-14, "Consolidation –810-10-15-14,Consolidation - Overall - Scope and Scope Exceptions", the Company did not eliminate through consolidation the Company's $619,000 equity investment in AMNB Statutory Trust I or the $264,000 equity investment in the MidCarolina Trusts. Instead, the Company reflected thisthese equity investmentinvestments in other assets in the "Accrued interest receivable and other assets" line item in theCompany's consolidated balance sheets.

80


A description of the junior subordinated debt securities outstanding payable to the trusts is shown below (dollars in thousands):

           Principal Amount
        As of December 31,
Issuing Entity 
Date Issued
 
Interest Rate
 
Maturity Date
 2017 2016
AMNB Trust I 4/7/2006 Libor plus 1.35% 6/30/2036 $20,619
 $20,619
           
MidCarolina Trust I 10/29/2002 Libor plus 3.45% 11/7/2032 4,322
 4,265
           
MidCarolina Trust II 12/3/2003 Libor plus 2.95% 10/7/2033 2,885
 2,840
           
           $27,826
 $27,724

     

Principal Amount

 
     

As of December 31,

 

Issuing Entity

Date Issued

Interest Rate

Maturity Date

 

2021

  

2020

 

AMNB Trust I

4/7/2006

Libor plus 1.35%

6/30/2036

 $20,619  $20,619 

MidCarolina Trust I

10/29/2002

Libor plus 3.45%

11/7/2032

  4,545   4,489 

MidCarolina Trust II

12/3/2003

Libor plus 2.95%

10/7/2033

  3,068   3,022 
     $28,232  $28,130 

The principal amounts reflected above for the MidCarolina Trusts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, are net of fair value marksadjustments of $833,000$610,000 and $724,000, $541,000 at December 31, 2021 and $666,000 and $587,000 at December 31, 2020, respectively. The original fair value marksadjustments of $1,197,000 and $1,021,000 were recorded as a result of the merger withacquisition of MidCarolina on July 1, 2011, and are being amortized into interest expense over the remaining lives of the respective borrowings.

Note 12 - Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company uses derivative financial instruments ("derivatives") primarily to manage risks associated with changing interest rates. The Company's derivatives are hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (cash flow or fair value hedge).

The Company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges when they are used to manage exposure to variability in cash flows on variable rate borrowings such as the Company's Trust Preferred Capital Notes. The Company uses interest rate swap agreements as part of its hedging strategy by exchanging variable-rate interest payments on a notional amount equal to the principal amount of the borrowings for fixed-rate interest payments, with such interest rates set based on benchmarked interest rates.

All interest rate swaps were entered into with counterparties that met the Company's credit standards and the agreements contain collateral provisions protecting the at-risk party. The Company believes that the credit risk inherent in these derivative contracts is not significant.

Terms and conditions of the interest rate swaps vary and amounts receivable or payable are recognized as accrued under the terms of the agreements. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship on a periodic basis. In accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, the effective portions of the derivatives' unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. Based on the Company's assessment, its cash flow hedges are highly effective, but to the extent that any ineffectiveness exists in the hedge relationships, the amounts would be recorded in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2021

 
  

Notional Amount

  

Positions

  

Assets

  

Liabilities

  

Cash Collateral Pledged

 

Cash flow hedges:

                    

Interest rate swaps:

                    

Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty

 $28,500  $3  $0  $2,800  $4,050 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 
  

Notional Amount

  

Positions

  

Assets

  

Liabilities

  

Cash Collateral Pledged

 

Cash flow hedges:

                    

Interest rate swaps:

                    

Variable-rate to fixed-rate swaps with counterparty

 $28,500  $3  $0  $4,868  $5,750 

In addition, the Company has commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors which are considered derivatives. It is the Company's practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of change in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans. These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships.

Note 1213 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company's 20082018 Stock Incentive Plan ("2008(the "2018 Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February 19, 2008 20, 2018 and approved by shareholders on April 22, 2008 May 15, 2018 at the Company's 20082018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Until its expiration date on February 18, The 2018 the 2008 Plan providedprovides for the granting of restricted stock awards, incentive and non-statutory options, and other equity-based awards to employees and directors on a periodic basis, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or a Board designated committee.Directors. The 20082018 Plan authorizedauthorizes the issuance of up to 500,000675,000 shares of common stock. The 2008 Plan replaced the Company's stock option plan that was approved by the shareholders at the 1997 Annual Meeting, which terminated in 2006. The 2008 Plan terminated in February 2018. The Board will be proposing a 2018 Equity Compensation Plan for shareholder approval at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

Stock Options

Accounting guidance requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.

A summary of stock option transactions for the year ended December 31, 20172021 is as follows:

 
Option
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)
Outstanding at December 31, 201658,411
 $24.37
    
Replacement stock options
 
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised(4,950) 22.93
    
Forfeited(578) 23.33
    
Expired(1,898) 36.08
    
Outstanding at December 31, 201750,985
 $24.09
 0.79 years $725
Exercisable at December 31, 201750,985
 $24.09
 0.79 years $725

          

Weighted

     
      

Weighted

  

Average

  

Aggregate

 
      

Average

  

Remaining

  

Intrinsic

 
  

Option

  

Exercise

  

Contractual Term

  

Value

 
  

Shares

  

Price

  

(In Years)

  

($000)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

  10,541  $16.63         

Granted

  0   0         

Exercised

  (5,346)  16.63         

Forfeited

  (332)  16.63         

Expired

  0   0         

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

  4,863  $16.63   2.97  $102 

Exercisable at December 31, 2021

  4,863  $16.63   2.97  $102 

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2017.2021. This amount changes based on changes in the fair value of the Company's common stock.


The total proceeds of the in-the-money options exercised during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 20152019 were $113,000, $142,000,$89,000, $43,000, and $789,000,$688,000, respectively. Total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 20152019 was $287,000, $11,000,$96,000, $42,000, and $220,000,$616,000, respectively.

In connection with the HomeTown acquisition, there was $147,000 in recognized stock compensation expense attributable to outstanding stock options in the year ended December 31,2019. There was 0 recognized stock compensation expense attributable to outstanding stock options in 2021 or 2020.As of December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, there was no recognized or0 unrecognized compensation expense attributable to the outstanding stock options.

The following table summarizes information related to stock options outstanding on December 31, 2017:

Options Outstanding and Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Outstanding
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$20.00 to $25.00 27,060
 1.04 years $22.10
$25.01 to $30.00 22,275
 0.55 25.82
$30.01 to $41.67 1,650
 0.01 33.33
  50,985
 0.79 years $24.09
No2021:

Options Outstanding and Exercisable

 
      

Weighted-Average

     
  

Number of

  

Remaining

     

Range of

 

Outstanding

  

Contractual Life

  

Weighted-Average

 

Exercise Prices

 

Options

  

(In Years)

  

Exercise Price

 

$15.00 to $20.00

  4,863   2.97  $16.63 

NaN stock options were granted in 2017, 20162021,2020 and 2015.2019.

82

Restricted Stock

The Company from time-to-time grants shares of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee directors. These awards help align the interests of these employees and directors with the interests of the shareholders of the Company by providing economic value directly related to increases in the value of the Company's common stock. The value of the stock awarded is established as the fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant. The Company recognizes expense, equal to the total value of such awards, ratably over the vesting period of the stock grants. Restricted stock granted in 20172021 cliff vests at the end of a 36-month period beginning on the date of grant. Nonvested restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 20172021 is summarized in the following table:

Restricted StockShares 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Value
Nonvested at December 31, 201650,822
 $23.21
Granted14,453
 34.74
Vested(18,774) 24.49
Forfeited
 
Nonvested at December 31, 201746,501
 26.28

      Weighted 
      

Average Grant

 
  

Shares

  

Date Value Per Share

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2020

  58,539  $34.81 

Granted

  27,712   29.39 

Vested

  (24,797)  36.04 

Forfeited

  (2,993)  31.14 

Nonvested at December 31, 2021

  58,461   31.91 

As of December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, there was $538,000, $568,000,$782,000, $797,000, and $340,000,$751,000, respectively, in unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock granted under the 20082018 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over the next 12 to 36 months. The share based compensation expense for nonvested restricted stock was $532,000, $444,000,$749,000, $672,000, and $322,000$915,000 during 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

Starting in 2010, The expense for 2019 included $257,000 of accelerated compensation expense as a result of the HomeTown merger.

The Company began offeringoffers its outside directors alternatives with respect to director compensation. TheFor 2021 and 2020, the regular monthlyquarterly board retainer cancould be received quarterly in the form of either (i) $5,800 in cash or (ii) shares of immediately vested but restricted stock with a market value of $6,250.$10,000. Monthly meeting fees can alsocould be received as $725$800 per meeting in cash or $1,000 in immediately vested but restricted stock. For 2019, the regular monthly board retainer could be received quarterly in the form of immediately vested but restricted stock with a market value of $7,500. Monthly meeting fees could be received as $725 in cash or $900 in immediately vested but restricted stock. For 2017, 11 of the 13 outside directors elected to receive stock in lieu of cash for either all of part of their retainer or meeting fees. Only outside directors receive board fees. The Company issued 13,093, 13,16620,474, 27,986 and 11,22817,373 shares and recognized share based compensation expense of $484,000, $380,000,$683,000, $779,000, and $275,000$626,000 during 2017, 20162021,2020 and 2015,2019, respectively.

During 2015, 4,158 shares with a market value of $95,000 were issued to a retired director as payment for cumulative deferred director compensation.

Note 1314 – Income Taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the states of Virginia and North Carolina. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2014.


2018.

The components of the Company's net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Allowance for loan losses

 $4,116  $4,636 

Nonaccrual loan interest

  250   507 

Other real estate owned valuation allowance

  23   124 

Deferred compensation

  1,183   159 

Acquisition accounting adjustments

  1,258   3,404 

Lease liability, net of right of use asset

  18   13 

Accrued pension liability

  320   447 

Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges

  588   1,022 

Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale

  469   0 

Other

  253   318 

Total deferred tax assets

  8,478   10,630 
         

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Depreciation

  1,094   1,352 

Core deposit intangibles

  999   1,315 

Prepaid pension

  0   213 

Deferred loan origination costs, net

  72   533 

Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale

  0   2,180 

Other

  6   32 

Total deferred tax liabilities

  2,171   5,625 

Net deferred tax assets

 $6,307  $5,005 

83

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets:   
Allowance for loan losses$3,047
 $4,480
Nonaccrual loan interest444
 610
Other real estate owned valuation allowance150
 199
Deferred compensation835
 1,335
Net unrealized losses on securities226
 81
Acquisition accounting adjustments1,283
 3,215
Accrued pension liability170
 100
Other488
 796
Total deferred tax assets6,643
 10,816
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Depreciation761
 1,030
Accretion of discounts on securities24
 113
Core deposit intangibles267
 602
Trust preferred fair value adjustment349
 581
Other201
 243
Total deferred tax liabilities1,602
 2,569
Net deferred tax assets$5,041
 $8,247

The provision for income taxes consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Current tax expense$7,355
 $6,125
 $4,279
Deferred tax expense724
 882
 1,741
Deferred tax asset adjustment for tax rate change2,747
 
 
Total income tax expense$10,826
 $7,007
 $6,020

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Current tax expense

 $10,905  $7,777  $3,793 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense

  808   (640)  1,068 

Total income tax expense

 $11,713  $7,137  $4,861 

A reconcilement of the "expected" Federalfederal income tax expense to reported income tax expense is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Expected federal tax expense

 $11,600  $7,808  $5,411 

Nondeductible interest expense

  8   31   67 

Tax-exempt interest

  (198)  (259)  (478)

State income taxes

  326   207   149 

Other, net

  (23)  (650)  (288)

Total income tax expense

 $11,713  $7,137  $4,861 

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Expected federal tax expense$9,126
 $8,158
 $7,371
Tax impact from enacted change in tax rate2,747
 
 
Nondeductible interest expense85
 94
 78
Tax-exempt interest(949) (1,265) (1,338)
State income taxes296
 296
 222
Other, net(479) (276) (313)
Total income tax expense$10,826
 $7,007
 $6,020
Income tax expense for 2017 includes a downward adjustment of net deferred tax assets in the amount of $2,747,000, recorded as a result of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act on December 22, 2017. The Tax Reform Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.

Note 1415 – Earnings Per Common Share

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per common share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of potentially dilutive common stock. Potentially dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common shareholders. Nonvested restricted shares are included in the computation of basic earnings per share as the holder is entitled to full shareholder benefits during the vesting period including voting rights and sharing in nonforfeitable dividends.

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
 Shares 
Per Share
Amount
Basic earnings per share8,641,717
 $1.76
 8,611,507
 $1.89
 8,680,502
 $1.73
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options18,911
 
 9,734
 
 7,948
 
Diluted earnings per share8,660,628
 $1.76
 8,621,241
 $1.89
 8,688,450
 $1.73
Outstanding

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 
      

Per Share

      

Per Share

      

Per Share

 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

 

Basic earnings per share

  10,873,817  $4.00   10,981,623  $2.74   10,531,572  $1.99 

Effect of dilutive securities - stock options

  3,414   0   4,167   (0.01)  9,765   (0.01)

Diluted earnings per share

  10,877,231  $4.00   10,985,790  $2.73   10,541,337  $1.98 

There were 0 outstanding stock options on common stock whichthat were not included in computingexcluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in 2017, 2016, and 2015 because their effects were anti-dilutive averaged 330 shares, 11,397 shares,in 2021,2020, and 66,238 shares, respectively.2019.

84

Note 1516 – Off-Balance Sheet Activities

The Company is party to credit-related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if applicable, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.

The Company's exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk were outstanding at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 (dollars in thousands):

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Commitments to extend credit$341,760
 $345,803
Standby letters of credit13,647
 4,088
Mortgage loan rate lock commitments5,089
 12,839

  

December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Commitments to extend credit

 $654,436  $503,272 

Standby letters of credit

  10,201   17,355 

Mortgage loan rate lock commitments

  10,891   26,883 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. These commitments generally consist of unused portions of lines of credit issued to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

At December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had locked-rate commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to approximately $5,089,000$10,891,000 and loans held for sale of $1,639,000.$8,481,000. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts, though the Company has never experienced a failure of one of its counterparties to perform. If a loan becomes past due 90 days within 180 days of sale, the Company would be required to repurchase the loan.


Note 1617 – Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, loans are granted to executive officers, directors, and their related entities. Management believes that all such loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to similar, unrelated borrowers, and do not involve more than a normal risk of collectibilitycollectability or present other unfavorable features. As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016, 2020,none of these loans werewas restructured, past due, or on nonaccrual status.

An analysis of these loans for 20172021 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2016$22,078
Additions24,265
Repayments(20,589)
Reclassifications(1)
(11,533)
Balance at December 31, 2017$14,221
(1)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $8,522 

Additions

  7,935 

Repayments

  (601)

Reclassifications(1)

  (3)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $15,853 

__________________________

(1) Includes loans (i) to persons no longer affiliated with the Company and therefore not considered related party loans as of period end or (ii) that were considered related party loans in the prior year but were subsequently not considered related party loans in the current year.

end.

Related party deposits totaled $22,077,000$10,920,000 at December 31, 20172021 and $22,121,000$16,436,000 at December 31, 2016.2020.

85


Note 1718 – Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Plan

The Company previously maintained a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan which covered substantially all employees who were 21 years of age or older and who had at least one year of service. The Company froze its pension plan to new participants and converted its pension plan to a cash balance plan effective December 31, 2009. Each year, existing participants will receive, with some adjustments, income based on the yield of the 10 year U.S. Treasury Note in December of the preceding year. Information pertaining to the activity in the plan is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

            

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $5,821  $6,262  $5,812 

Service cost

  0   0   0 

Interest cost

  91   152   209 

Actuarial (gain) loss

  (259)  814   489 

Settlement gain (loss)

  6   44   (12)

Benefits paid

  (646)  (1,451)  (236)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

  5,013   5,821   6,262 
             

Change in Plan Assets:

            

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  4,701   5,915   5,653 

Actual return on plan assets

  190   237   498 

Employer contributions

  800   0   0 

Benefits paid

  (646)  (1,451)  (236)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  5,045   4,701   5,915 
             

Funded Status at End of Year

 $32  $(1,120) $(347)
             

Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets

            

Other assets (liabilities)

 $32  $(1,120) $(347)
             

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

            

Net actuarial loss

 $1,481  $2,071  $1,658 

Deferred income taxes

  (320)  (435)  (358)

Amount recognized

 $1,161  $1,636  $1,300 

  

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

            

Service cost

 $0  $0  $0 

Interest cost

  91   152   209 

Expected return on plan assets

  (230)  (285)  (269)

Recognized net loss due to settlement

  195   352   52 

Recognized net actuarial loss

  182   140   133 

Net periodic benefit cost

 $238  $359  $125 
             

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss

            

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 $(590) $413  $64 

Amortization of prior service cost

  0   0   0 

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss

 $(590) $413  $64 
             

Total Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss

 $(352) $772  $189 

86
 As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Change in Benefit Obligation:     
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year$7,932
 $8,453
 $10,710
Service cost
 
 
Interest cost237
 269
 297
Actuarial (gain) loss611
 352
 (100)
Settlement gain(3) (51) 
Benefits paid(464) (1,091) (2,454)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year8,313
 7,932
 8,453
      
Change in Plan Assets: 
  
  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year7,647
 8,428
 10,949
Actual return on plan assets373
 310
 (67)
Benefits paid(464) (1,091) (2,454)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year7,556
 7,647
 8,428
      
Funded Status at End of Year$(757) $(285) $(25)
      
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets 
  
  
Other liabilities$(757) $(285) $(25)
      
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
Net actuarial loss$2,886
 $2,652
 $2,818
Deferred income taxes(606) (928) (986)
Amount recognized$2,280
 $1,724
 $1,832
      
 As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost 
  
  
Service cost$
 $
 $
Interest cost237
 269
 297
Expected return on plan assets(353) (385) (459)
Recognized net loss due to settlement135
 315
 671
Recognized net actuarial loss218
 228
 293
Net periodic benefit cost$237
 $427
 $802

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss     
Net actuarial (gain) loss$234
 $(166) $(538)
Amortization of prior service cost
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss$234
 $(166) $(538)
      
Total Recognized in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss$471
 $261
 $264

The accumulated benefit obligation as of December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 20152019 was $8,313,000, $7,932,000,$5,014,000, $5,821,000, and $8,453,000,$6,262,000, respectively. The rate of compensation increase is no longer applicable since the defined benefit plan was frozen and converted to a cash balance plan.

The plan sponsor selected the expected long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption in consultation with their investment advisors and actuary. This rate was intended to reflect the average rate of earnings expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested to provide plan benefits. Historical performance is reviewed, especially with respect to real rates of return (net of inflation), for the major asset classes held or anticipated to be held by the trust, and for the trust itself. Undue weight is not given to recent experience that may not continue over the measurement period, with higher significance placed on current forecasts of future long-term economic conditions.

Because assets are held in a qualified trust, anticipated returns are not reduced for taxes. Further, solely for this purpose, the plan is assumed to continue in force and not terminate during the period in which assets are invested. However, consideration is given to the potential impact of current and future investment policy, cash flow into and out of the trust, and expenses (both investment and non-investment) typically paid from plan assets (to the extent such expenses are not explicitly estimated within periodic cost).

Below is a description of the plan's assets. The plan's weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as follows as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016:

Asset CategoryDecember 31,
 2017 2016
Fixed Income61.7% 51.3%
Equity29.5% 38.0%
Cash and Accrued Income8.8% 10.7%
Total100.0% 100.0%
2020:

Asset Category

 

December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Fixed Income

  56.5%  65.6%

Equity

  22.9%  31.5%

Cash and Accrued Income

  20.6%  2.9%

Total

  100.0%  100.0%

The investment policy and strategy for plan assets can best be described as a growth and income strategy. Diversification is accomplished by limiting the holding of any one equity issuer to no more than 5% of total equities. Exchange traded funds are used to provide diversified exposure to the small capitalization and international equity markets. All fixed income investments are rated as investment grade, with the majority of these assets invested in corporate issues. The assets are managed by the Company's Trust and Investment Services Division. No derivatives are used to manage the assets. Equity securities do not include holdings in the Company.

The fair value of the Company's pension plan assets at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, by asset category are as follows (dollars in thousands):

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2021 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

2021

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Cash

 $1,042  $1,042  $0  $0 

Fixed income securities

                

Government sponsored entities

  469   0   469   0 

Municipal bonds and notes

  2,067   0   2,067   0 

Corporate bonds and notes

  312   0   312   0 

Equity securities

                

U.S. companies

  964   964   0   0 

Foreign companies

  191   191   0   0 
  $5,045  $2,197  $2,848  $0 

87
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 using
 Balance at December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Asset Category2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash$617
 $617
 $
 $
Fixed income securities 
  
  
  
Government sponsored entities1,892
 
 1,892
 
Municipal bonds and notes1,931
 
 1,931
 
Corporate bonds and notes880
 
 880
 
Equity securities 
  
  
  
U.S. companies1,768
 1,768
 
 
Foreign companies468
 468
 
 
 $7,556
 $2,853
 $4,703
 $


   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 using
 Balance at December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Asset Category2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cash$780
 $780
 $
 $
Fixed income securities 
  
  
  
Government sponsored entities1,496
 
 1,496
 
Municipal bonds and notes1,453
 
 1,453
 
Corporate bonds and notes973
 
 973
 
Equity securities 
  
  
  
U.S. companies2,505
 2,505
 
 
Foreign companies440
 440
 
 
 $7,647
 $3,725
 $3,922
 $
 
      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Asset Category

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Cash

 $138  $138  $0  $0 

Fixed income securities

                

Government sponsored entities

  444   0   444   0 

Municipal bonds and notes

  2,147   0   2,147   0 

Corporate bonds and notes

  491   0   491   0 

Equity securities

                

U.S. companies

  1,259   1,259   0   0 

Foreign companies

  222   222   0   0 
  $4,701  $1,619  $3,082  $0 

Projected benefit payments for the years 20182022 to 20262031 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

YearAmount
2018$1,248
2019894
2020457
2021673
2022617
2023-20263,519
401(k)

Year

  

Amount

 

2022

  $142 

2023

   716 

2024

   240 

2025

   1,195 

2026

   193 
2027 - 2031   2,324 

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a 401(k)401(k) plan that covers substantially all full-time employees of the Company. The Company matches a portion of the contribution made by employee participants after at least one year of service. The Company contributed $763,000, $623,000,$1,121,000, $1,038,000, and $602,000$932,000 to the 401(k)401(k) plan in 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. These amounts are included in employee benefits expense for the respective years.

Deferred Compensation Arrangements

The

Prior to 2015, the Company has historically maintained deferred compensation agreements with certain current and former employees providing for annual payments to each ranging from $25,000 to $50,000 per year for ten10 years upon their retirement. The liabilities under these agreements are beingwere accrued over the officers' remaining periods of employment so that, on the date of their retirement, the then-present value of the annual payments would havehad been accrued. As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company only had one remaining agreement under which payments are being made to a former officer. The liabilities were $350,000$150,000 and $397,000$200,000 at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. TheThere was 0 expense for these agreements was $3,000, $6,000, and $8,000this agreement for the years ended December 31,2021,2020, and 2019. As a result of acquisitions, the Company has various agreements with current and former employees and executives with balances of $5,552,000 and $5,585,000 at December 31,2021 and 2020, respectively that accrue through eligibility and are payable upon retirement. The Company recognized expenses of $430,000, $422,000 and $194,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

Certain named executive officers are eligible to participate in a voluntary, nonqualified deferred compensation plan pursuant to which the officers may defer any portion of their annual cash incentive payments. In addition, the Company may make discretionary cash bonus contributions to the deferred compensation plan. Such contributions, if any, are made on an annual basis after the Committee assesses the performance of each of the named executive officers and the Company during the most recently completed fiscal year. The contributions charged to salary expense were $184,000, $0 and $158,000 for the years ended December 31,2021,2020 and 2019, respectively.

Incentive Arrangements

The Company maintains a cash incentive compensation plan for officers based on the Company's performance and individual officer goals. The total amount charged to salary expense for this plan was $1,243,000, $916,000,$2,897,000, $1,214,000 and $559,000$1,217,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

88

Note 1819 – Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the fair value measurements and disclosures topic of FASB ASC 825,Financial Instruments, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases


where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1

Level 1 –

Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2

Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.

Level 3

Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1)1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2)2).

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. These loans currently consist of residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded in current period earnings as a component of mortgage banking income on the Company's consolidated statements of income.

Derivative asset (liability) - cash flow hedges: Cash flow hedges are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Cash flow hedges are valued by a third party using significant assumptions that are observable in the market and can be corroborated by market data. All of the Company's cash flow hedges are classified as Level 2.

89

The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period (dollars in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
Description2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$112,127
 $
 $112,127
 $
Mortgage-backed and CMOs105,316
 
 105,316
 
State and municipal93,626
 
 93,626
 
Corporate8,062
 
 8,062
 
Equity securities2,206
 
 2,206
 
Total$321,337
 $
 $321,337
 $

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Securities available for sale:       
Federal agencies and GSEs$104,054
 $
 $104,054
 $
Mortgage-backed and CMOs79,493
 
 79,493
 
State and municipal147,515
 
 147,515
 
Corporate13,492
 
 13,492
 
Equity Securities1,948
 
 1,948
 
Total$346,502
 $
 $346,502
 $

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2021 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2021

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $149,577  $0  $149,577  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  104,580   0   104,580   0 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  356,310   0   356,310   0 

State and municipal

  66,472   0   66,472   0 

Corporate

  15,528   0   15,528   0 

Total securities available for sale

 $692,467  $0  $692,467  $0 

Loans held for sale

 $8,481  $0  $8,481  $0 

Liabilities:

                

Derivative - cash flow hedges

 $2,800  $0  $2,800  $0 

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Securities available for sale:

                

U.S. Treasury

 $34,998  $0  $34,998  $0 

Federal agencies and GSEs

  106,023   0   106,023   0 

Mortgage-backed and CMOs

  252,782   0   252,782   0 

State and municipal

  59,099   0   59,099   0 

Corporate

  13,189   0   13,189   0 

Total securities available for sale

 $466,091  $0  $466,091  $0 

Loans held for sale

 $15,591  $0  $15,591  $0 

Liabilities:

                

Derivative - cash flow hedges

 $4,868  $0  $4,868 ��$0 

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Company records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. No nonrecurring fair value adjustments were recorded on loans held for sale during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded within mortgage banking income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Impaired loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements will not be collected when due. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the Company's collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing a market valuation approach based on an appraisal, of one year or less, conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser using observable market data (Level 2)2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the property is more than one year old and not solely based on observable market comparablecomparables or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, then a Level 3 valuation is considered to measure the fair value. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal, of one year or less, if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business's financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3)3). Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Income.income.

90

Other real estate owned:  Measurement for fair values for other real estate owned are the same as impaired loans. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as a valuation allowance against other real estate ownedOREO with the associated expense included in other real estate ownedOREO expense, net on the Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Income.


income.

The following table summarizes the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period (dollars in thousands):

   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Loans held for sale$1,639
 $
 $1,639
 $
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance1,391
 
 
 1,391
Other real estate owned, net1,225
 
 
 1,225
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
 Balance as of December 31, 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Description2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:       
Loans held for sale$5,996
 $
 $5,996
 $
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance2,151
 
 
 2,151
Other real estate owned, net1,328
 
 
 1,328

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2021 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2021

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance

 $7  $0  $0  $7 

Other real estate owned, net

  143   0   0   143 

      

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices

  

Significant

     
      

in Active

  

Other

  

Significant

 
  

Balance as of

  

Markets for

  

Observable

  

Unobservable

 
  

December 31,

  

Identical Assets

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 

Description

 

2020

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Assets:

                

Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance

 $268  $0  $0  $268 

Other real estate owned, net

  958   0   0   958 

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2017:

AssetsValuation TechniqueUnobservable Input

Rate
Impaired loansDiscounted appraised2021 and 2020:

     

December 31, 2021

   

December 31, 2020

 

Assets

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

 

Range; Weighted Average (1)

  

Range; Weighted Average (1)

 
           

Impaired loans

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

  

8.00%

   

8.00%

 
 

Discounted cash flow analysis

Market rate for borrower (discount rate)

 

4.13% - 4.73%; 4.35%

  

4.13% - 7.20%; 5.19%

 
           

Other real estate owned

Discounted appraised value

Selling cost

  

8.00%

   

8.00%

 

__________________________

(1) Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value

Selling cost8.00%
Impaired loansDiscounted cash flow analysisMarket rate for borrower (discount rate)3.25% - 9.80%
Other real estate ownedDiscounted appraised valueSelling cost8.00%
Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2016:
AssetsValuation TechniqueUnobservable Input

Rate
Impaired loansDiscounted appraised valueSelling cost8.00%
Other real estate ownedDiscounted appraised valueSelling cost6.00%
the impaired loans.

FASB ASC 825, "FinancialFinancial Instruments", requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments, for interim periodsincluding those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not required to be measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. ASC 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financialnonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company. The Company uses the exit price notion in calculating the fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

91


The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 20172021 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using
 Carrying Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Fair Value
Balance
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Financial Assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$52,477
 $52,477
 $
 $
 $52,477
Securities available for sale321,337
 
 321,337
 
 321,337
Restricted stock6,110
 
 6,110
 
 6,110
Loans held for sale1,639
 
 1,639
 
 1,639
Loans, net of allowance1,322,522
 
 
 1,317,737
 1,317,737
Bank owned life insurance18,460
 
 18,460
 
 18,460
Accrued interest receivable5,231
 
 5,231
 
 5,231
          
Financial Liabilities: 
  
  
  
  
Deposits$1,534,726
 $
 $1,151,068
 $376,888
 $1,527,956
Repurchase agreements10,726
 
 10,726
 
 10,726
Other short-term borrowings24,000
 
 24,000
 
 24,000
Junior subordinated debt27,826
 
 
 28,358
 28,358
Accrued interest payable674
 
 674
 
 674

  

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2021 Using

 
      Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets  Significant Other Observable Inputs  Significant Unobservable Inputs  

Fair Value

 
  

Carrying Value

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

  

Balance

 

Financial Assets:

                    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $510,868  $510,868  $0  $0  $510,868 

Securities available for sale

  692,467   0   692,467   0   692,467 

Restricted stock

  8,056   0   8,056   0   8,056 

Loans held for sale

  8,481   0   8,481   0   8,481 

Loans, net of allowance

  1,927,902   0   0   1,914,887   1,914,887 

Bank owned life insurance

  29,107   0   29,107   0   29,107 

Accrued interest receivable

  5,822   0   5,822   0   5,822 
                     

Financial Liabilities:

                    

Deposits

 $2,890,353  $0  $2,892,487  $0  $2,892,487 

Repurchase agreements

  41,128   0   41,128   0   41,128 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,232   0   0   26,635   26,635 

Accrued interest payable

  392   0   392   0   392 

Derivative - cash flow hedges

  2,800   0   2,800   0   2,800 

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 20162020 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2020 Using

 
      

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets

  Significant Other Observable Inputs  Significant Unobservable Inputs  

Fair Value

 
  

Carrying Value

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

  

Balance

 

Financial Assets:

                    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $374,370  $374,370  $0  $0  $374,370 

Securities available for sale

  466,091   0   466,091   0   466,091 

Restricted stock

  8,715   0   8,715   0   8,715 

Loans held for sale

  15,591   0   15,591   0   15,591 

Loans, net of allowance

  1,993,653   0   0   1,992,326   1,992,326 

Bank owned life insurance

  28,482   0   28,482   0   28,482 

Accrued interest receivable

  7,193   0   7,193   0   7,193 
                     

Financial Liabilities:

                    

Deposits

 $2,611,330  $0  $2,615,157  $0  $2,615,157 

Repurchase agreements

  42,551   0   42,551   0   42,551 

Subordinated debt

  7,500   0   7,522   0   7,522 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,130   0   0   21,696   21,696 

Accrued interest payable

  778   0   778   0   778 

Derivative - cash flow hedges

  4,868   0   4,868   0   4,868 

92

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
 Carrying Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs 
Fair Value
Balance
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Financial Assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$53,207
 $53,207
 $
 $
 $53,207
Securities available for sale346,502
 
 346,502
 
 346,502
Restricted stock6,224
 
 6,224
 
 6,224
Loans held for sale5,996
 
 5,996
 
 5,996
Loans, net of allowance1,152,020
 
 
 1,136,961
 1,136,961
Bank owned life insurance18,163
 
 18,163
 
 18,163
Accrued interest receivable5,083
 
 5,083
 
 5,083
          
Financial Liabilities: 
  
  
  
  
Deposits$1,370,640
 $
 $991,785
 $374,774
 $1,366,559
Repurchase agreements39,166
 
 39,166
 
 39,166
Other short-term borrowings20,000
 
 20,000
 
 20,000
Long-term borrowings9,980
 
 
 10,156
 10,156
Junior subordinated debt27,724
 
 
 24,932
 24,932
Accrued interest payable623
 
 623
 
 623

Cash and cash equivalents.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimateTable of fair value.Contents

Securities.  Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Restricted stock.  The carrying value of restricted stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the respective entity.
Loans held for sale.  The carrying amount is at fair value.
Loans.  For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.  Fair values for fixed-rate loans are estimated based upon discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.  Fair values for nonperforming loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Bank owned life insurance. Bank owned life insurance represents insurance policies on officers, directors, and past directors of the Company.  The cash value of the policies are estimates using information provided by insurance carriers.  These policies are carried at their cash surrender value, which approximates the fair value.
Accrued interest receivable.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Deposits.  The fair value of demand deposits, savings deposits, and money market deposits equals the carrying value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar deposit instruments would be offered to depositors for the same remaining maturities.
Repurchase agreements.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Other short-term borrowings.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Long-term borrowings.  The fair values of long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the interest rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Junior subordinated debt.  Fair value is calculated by discounting the future cash flows using the estimated current interest rates at which similar securities would be issued.
Accrued interest payable.  The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Off-balance sheet instruments.  The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.  At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of off balance sheet instruments was deemed immaterial, and therefore was not included in the table above.  The various off-balance sheet instruments were discussed in

Note 15.

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that interest rates will change) in its normal operations.  As a result, the fair values of the Company's financial instruments will change when interest rates change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company.
Note 1920 – Dividend Restrictions and Regulatory Capital

The approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the bank's retained net income, as defined, for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years. Under this formula, the Bank can distribute as dividends to the Company, without the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, $16,011,000up to $35,132,000 as of December 31, 2017.2021. Dividends paid by the Bank to the Company are the only significant source of funding for dividends paid by the Company to its shareholders.

Banks

Federal bank regulators have issued substantially similar guidelines requiring banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatorymaintain capital requirements administered by federalat certain levels. In addition, regulators may from time to time require that a banking agencies.  Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measuresorganization maintain capital above the minimum levels because of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators.its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiatetrigger certain regulatory action. mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The finalFRB and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have adopted rules implementingto implement the Basel III capital framework as outlined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision'sSupervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Basel III Capital Rules"). The Basel III Capital Rules require banks and bank holding companies to comply with certain minimum capital guidelines for U.S. banks (Basel III rules) became effectiveratios, plus a "capital conservation buffer," as set forth in the table below. The capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in ratably over a four year period beginning on January 1, 2016, is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and is applicable to all ratios except the leverage capital ratio. Institutions with a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio above the minimum (4.5%) but below the minimum plus the conservation buffer (7.0%) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and discretionary compensation paid to certain officers, based on the amount of the shortfall. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the "prompt corrective action" regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. The minimum capital ratios for the Company on January 1, 2015Bank to be considered "well capitalized" are set forth in the table below.

On September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act that permits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to be subject to a 9% leverage ratio (commonly referred to as the community bank leverage ratio or "CBLR"). Under the final rule, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% are not subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and are deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the "prompt corrective action" framework. In addition, a community bank that falls out of compliance with the framework has a two-quarter grace period to come back into full compliance, with all ofprovided its leverage ratio remains above 8%, and will be deemed well-capitalized during the requirements being phased-in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased-in by January 1, 2019.grace period. The net unrealized gain or


loss onCBLR framework was first available for sale securitiesbanking organizations to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. The Company and unfunded pension liability is included in computing regulatory capital. the Bank do mot currently expect to opt into the CBLR framework.

Management believes that as of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company and Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At year-end 20172021 and 2016,2020, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized"well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's category.

93

Actual and required capital amounts (in thousands) and ratios are presented below at year-end:

 Actual Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes* To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount
 Ratio
December 31, 2017           
Common Equity Tier 1           
Company$166,968
 11.50% $83,476
 >5.75%    
Bank184,656
 12.79
 83,024
 >5.75
 $93,854
 >6.50%
            
Tier 1 Capital           
Company194,794
 13.42
 105,253
 >7.25
    
Bank184,656
 12.79
 104,683
 >7.25
 115,512
 >8.00
            
Total Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company208,973
 14.39
 134,288
 >9.25
    
Bank198,465
 13.75
 133,561
 >9.25
 144,390
 >10.00
            
Leverage Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company194,794
 10.95
 71,128
 >4.00
    
Bank184,656
 10.43
 70,796
 >4.00
 88,495
 >5.00
            
December 31, 2016 
  
  
    
  
Common Equity Tier 1           
Company$158,350
 11.77% $68,972
 >5.125%    
Bank172,927
 12.92
 68,580
 >5.125
 $86,979
 >6.50%
            
Tier 1 Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company186,074
 13.83
 89,159
 >6.625
    
Bank172,927
 12.92
 88,652
 >6.625
 107,051
 >8.00
            
Total Capital 
  
  
    
  
Company199,375
 14.81
 116,075
 >8.625
    
Bank185,931
 13.89
 115,415
 >8.625
 133,814
 >10.00
            
Leverage Capital           
Company186,074
 11.67
 63,761
 >4.00
    
Bank172,927
 10.88
 63,571
 >4.00
 79,464
 >5.00
year-end. 

                  

To Be Well

 
                  

Capitalized Under

 
                  

Prompt Corrective

 
  

Actual

  

Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes

  

Action Provisions

 
  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

  

Amount

  

Ratio

 

December 31, 2021

                        

Common Equity Tier 1

                        

Company

 $270,192   12.43% $97,798   >7.00%   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  285,260   13.15   151,845   >7.00  $140,999   >6.50% 
                         

Tier 1 Capital

                        

Company

  298,424   13.73   130,397   >8.50   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  285,260   13.15   184,383   >8.50   173,537   >8.00 
                         

Total Capital

                        

Company

  317,488   14.61   173,862   >10.50   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  304,324   14.03   277,767   >10.50   216,921   >10.00 
                         

Leverage Capital

                        

Company

  298,424   9.13   130,722   >4.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  285,260   8.76   130,264   >4.00   162,830   >5.00 
                         

December 31, 2020

                        

Common Equity Tier 1

                        

Company

 $244,318   12.36% $88,967   >7.00%   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   12.86   137,530   >7.00  $127,706   >6.50% 
                         

Tier 1 Capital

                        

Company

  272,448   13.78   118,623   >8.50   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   12.86   167,001   >8.50   157,177   >8.00 
                         

Total Capital

                        

Company

  300,155   15.18   158,164   >10.50   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  274,455   13.97   206,295   >10.50   196,471   >10.00 
                         

Leverage Capital

                        

Company

  272,448   9.48   114,902   >4.00   N/A   N/A 

Bank

  252,748   8.85   114,247   >4.00   142,809   >5.00 

* Except with regard to the Company's and the Bank's leverage capital ratio, includes the current phased-in portion of the Basel III Capital Rules capital conservation buffer which is added to the minimum capital requirements for capital adequacy purposes. The capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased-in effective January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but belowRatios include the conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.buffer.


Note 2021 – Segment and Related Information

The Company has two reportable segments, community banking and trust and investment services.

wealth management.

Community banking involves making loans to and generating deposits from individuals and businesses. All assets and liabilities of the Company are allocated to community banking. Investment income from securities is also allocated to the community banking segment. Loan fee income, service charges from deposit accounts, and non-deposit fees such as automated teller machine fees and insurance commissions generate additional income for the community banking segment.

Trust and investment services

Wealth management include estate planning, trust account administration, investment management, and retail brokerage. Investment management services include purchasing equity, fixed income, and mutual fund investments for customer accounts. The trust and investment serviceswealth management segment receives fees for investment and administrative services.

94

Amounts shown in the "Other" column include activities

Segment information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021,2020, and 2015,2019, is shown in the following table (dollars in thousands):

  

2021

 
  

Community Banking

  

Wealth Management

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $95,796  $0  $95,796 

Interest expense

  5,405   0   5,405 

Noninterest income

  15,012   6,019   21,031 

Noninterest expense

  56,251   2,757   59,008 

Income before income taxes

  51,977   3,262   55,239 

Net income

  40,949   2,577   43,526 

Depreciation and amortization

  3,697   10   3,707 

Total assets

  3,334,347   250   3,334,597 

Goodwill

  85,048   0   85,048 

Capital expenditures

  1,000   0   1,000 

  

2020

 
  

Community Banking

  

Wealth Management

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $95,840  $0  $95,840 

Interest expense

  12,020   0   12,020 

Noninterest income

  12,054   4,789   16,843 

Noninterest expense

  52,245   2,320   54,565 

Income before income taxes

  34,714   2,468   37,182 

Net income

  28,052   1,993   30,045 

Depreciation and amortization

  3,815   10   3,825 

Total assets

  3,049,779   231   3,050,010 

Goodwill

  85,048   0   85,048 

Capital expenditures

  2,690   4   2,694 

  

2019

 
  

Community Banking

  

Wealth Management

  

Total

 

Interest income

 $92,855  $0  $92,855 

Interest expense

  15,728   0   15,728 

Noninterest income

  10,602   4,568   15,170 

Noninterest expense

  63,794   2,280   66,074 

Income before income taxes

  23,479   2,288   25,767 

Net income

  19,050   1,856   20,906 

Depreciation and amortization

  3,454   8   3,462 

Total assets

  2,478,478   72   2,478,550 

Goodwill

  84,002   0   84,002 

Capital expenditures

  3,534   21   3,555 

 2017
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$62,697
 $
 $341
 $
 $63,038
Interest expense6,263
 
 1,028
 
 7,291
Noninterest income9,224
 4,756
 247
 
 14,227
Income (loss) before income taxes24,828
 2,521
 (1,274) 
 26,075
Net income (loss)14,456
 1,486
 (693) 
 15,249
Depreciation and amortization2,393
 12
 
 
 2,405
Total assets1,806,647
 
 236,644
 (227,213) 1,816,078
Goodwill43,872
 
 
 
 43,872
Capital expenditures2,637
 11
 
 
 2,648
 2016
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$56,076
 $
 $94
 $
 $56,170
Interest expense5,438
 
 878
 
 6,316
Noninterest income8,848
 4,634
 23
 
 13,505
Income (loss) before income taxes22,230
 2,623
 (1,545) 
 23,308
Net income (loss)15,486
 1,835
 (1,020) 
 16,301
Depreciation and amortization2,845
 11
 
 
 2,856
Total assets1,669,629
 
 229,241
 (220,232) 1,678,638
Goodwill43,872
 
 
 
 43,872
Capital expenditures3,609
 4
 
 
 3,613
95


 2015
 
Community Banking
 
Trust and Investment Services
 Other 
Intersegment Eliminations
 Total
Interest income$55,109
 $
 $60
 $
 $55,169
Interest expense5,144
 
 760
 
 5,904
Noninterest income8,386
 4,881
 20
 
 13,287
Income (loss) before income taxes19,398
 2,737
 (1,076) 
 21,059
Net income (loss)13,793
 1,956
 (710) 
 15,039
Depreciation and amortization3,022
 12
 
 
 3,034
Total assets1,545,377
 
 225,533
 (223,311) 1,547,599
Goodwill43,872
 
 
 
 43,872
Capital expenditures1,453
 21
 
 
 1,474

Note 2122 – Parent Company Financial Information

Condensed Parent Company financial information is as follows (dollars in thousands):

  

December 31,

 

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

2021

  

2020

 

Cash

 $10,560  $17,759 

Securities available for sale, at fair value

  1,766   8,534 

Investment in subsidiaries

  372,902   351,033 

Due from subsidiaries

  128   143 

Other assets

  607   1,062 

Total Assets

 $385,963  $378,531 
         

Subordinated debt

 $0  $7,500 

Junior subordinated debt

  28,232   28,130 

Other liabilities

  2,939   5,007 

Shareholders' equity

  354,792   337,894 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 $385,963  $378,531 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Condensed Statements of Income

 

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Dividends from subsidiary

 $16,000  $25,500  $25,000 

Other income

  411   512   823 

Expenses

  3,057   3,369   4,232 

Income tax benefit

  (556)  (600)  (601)

Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary

  13,910   23,243   22,192 

Equity in undistributed (distributed) earnings of subsidiary

  29,616   6,802   (1,286)

Net Income

 $43,526  $30,045  $20,906 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

            

Net income

 $43,526  $30,045  $20,906 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

(Equity in earnings) distributions in excess of earnings of subsidiary

  (29,616)  (6,802)  1,286 

Net amortization of securities

  10   0   0 

Net change in other assets

  27   84   (382)

Net change in other liabilities

  102   85   (35)

Net cash operating activities

  14,049   23,412   21,775 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

            

Purchases of securities available for sale

  0   0   (2,220)

Sales, cal1s and maturities of equity securities

  6,800   0   445 

Cash paid in bank acquisition

  0   0   (27)

Cash acquired in bank acquisition

  0   0   981 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  6,800   0   (821)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

            

Common stock dividends paid

  (11,827)  (11,842)  (10,965)

Repurchase of common stock

  (8,810)  (4,981)  (3,146)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  89   43   688 

Net change in subordinated debt

  (7,500)  0   0 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (28,048)  (16,780)  (13,423)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  (7,199)  6,632   7,531 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  17,759   11,127   3,596 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $10,560  $17,759  $11,127 

 December 31,
Condensed Balance Sheets2017 2016
Cash$1,597
 $4,654
Securities available for sale, at fair value8,740
 8,355
Investment in subsidiaries226,452
 216,340
Due from subsidiaries46
 120
Other assets31
 40
Total Assets$236,866
 $229,509
    
Trust preferred capital notes$27,826
 $27,724
Other liabilities323
 405
Shareholders' equity208,717
 201,380
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$236,866
 $229,509
 Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Income2017 2016 2015
Dividends from subsidiary$6,000
 $16,000
 $11,000
Other income588
 117
 80
Expenses1,862
 1,662
 1,156
Income tax benefit(581) (526) (366)
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary5,307
 14,981
 10,290
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary9,942
 1,320
 4,749
Net Income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
96


 Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows2017 2016 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:     
Net income$15,249
 $16,301
 $15,039
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Gain on sale of securities(221) 
 
Equity in (undistributed) distributions of subsidiary(9,942) (1,320) (4,749)
Net change in other assets83
 (57) 257
Net change in other liabilities(82) 163
 106
Net cash provided by operating activities5,087
 15,087
 10,653
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:     
Purchases of securities available for sale(373) (6,588) 
Sales of securities available for sale500
 
 
Investment in banking subsidiary
 
 563
Cash paid in bank acquisition
 
 (5,935)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities127
 (6,588) (5,372)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:     
Common stock dividends paid(8,384) (8,266) (8,068)
Repurchase of common stock
 (1,292) (3,506)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options113
 142
 789
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
 
 95
Net cash used in financing activities(8,271) (9,416) (10,690)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(3,057) (917) (5,409)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period4,654
 5,571
 10,980
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,597
 $4,654
 $5,571

Note 22 – Concentrations of Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company's loans are made within its market area, which includes Southern and Central Virginia and the northern portion of Central North Carolina.  The ultimate collectibility of the Company's loan portfolio and the ability to realize the value of any underlying collateral, if necessary, are impacted by the economic conditions and real estate values of the market area.
Loans secured by real estate were $1,080,031,000, or 80.8% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2017, and $951,073,000, or 81.6% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2016.  Loans secured by commercial real estate represented the largest portion of loans at $637,701,000 at December 31, 2017 and $510,960,000 at December 31, 2016, 47.7% and 43.9%, respectively of total loans.  There were no concentrations of loans to any individual, group of individuals, business, or industry that exceeded 10% of total loans at December 31, 2017 or 2016.


Note 23 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information

(dollars in thousands)

 

As of or for the Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

 

Supplemental Schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents:

            

Cash and due from banks

 $23,095  $30,767  $32,505 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

  487,773   343,603   47,077 
  $510,868  $374,370  $79,582 
             

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

            

Cash paid for:

            

Interest on deposits and borrowed funds

 $5,791  $12,455  $15,310 

Income taxes

  3,102   7,609   4,698 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

            

Transfer of loans to other real estate owned

  0   95   234 

Transfer of loans to repossessions

  0   411   0 

Transfer from premises and equipment to other assets

  1,316   0   445 

Increase (decrease) in operating lease right-of-use asset

  (21)  371   4,453 

Increase (decrease) in operating lease liabilities

  (21)  371   4,453 

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale

  (12,271)  6,399   8,821 

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

  2,068   (2,210)  (1,854)

Change in unfunded pension liability

  590   (413)  (64)
             

Non-cash transactions related to acquisitions:

            
             

Assets acquired:

            

Investment securities

  0   0   34,876 

Restricted stock

  0   0   2,588 

Loans

  0   0   444,324 

Premises and equipment

  0   0   12,554 

Deferred income taxes

  0   0   2,960 

Core deposit intangible

  0   0   8,200 

Other real estate owned

  0   0   1,442 

Bank owned life insurance

  0   0   8,246 

Other assets

  0   0   14,244 
             

Liabilities assumed:

            

Deposits

  0   0   483,626 

Short-term FHLB advances

  0   0   14,883 

Long-term FHLB advances

  0   0   778 

Subordinated debt

  0   0   7,530 

Other liabilities

  0   0   5,780 
             

Consideration:

            

Issuance of common stock

  0   0   82,470 

Fair value of replacement stock options/restricted stock

  0   0   753 

97

(dollars in thousands)For the Years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental Schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents:     
    Cash and due from banks$28,594
 $20,268
 $19,352
  Interest-bearing deposits in other banks23,883
 32,939
 75,985
 $52,477
 $53,207
 $95,337
      
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: 
  
  
    Cash paid for: 
  
  
        Interest on deposits and borrowed funds$7,240
 $6,348
 $5,836
        Income taxes7,653
 6,477
 3,090
    Noncash investing and financing activities: 
  
  
        Transfer of loans to other real estate owned1,233
 295
 2,101
        Unrealized loss on securities available for sale(777) (6,572) (2,652)
        Change in unfunded pension liability(234) 166
 538
      
Non-cash transactions related to acquisitions:     
      
    Investment securities
 
 18,507
    Restricted stock
 
 587
    Loans
 
 115,960
    Premises and equipment
 
 956
    Deferred income taxes
 
 2,794
    Core deposit intangible
 
 1,839
    Other real estate owned, net
 
 168
    Bank owned life insurance
 
 1,955
    Other assets
 
 1,049
      
Liabilities assumed:     
    Demand, MMDA, and savings deposits
 
 82,451
    Time deposits
 
 54,872
    Other liabilities
 
 3,076
      
Consideration:     
    Issuance of common stock
 
 20,483


Note 24 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI")

(Loss)

Changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Securities
 
Adjustments
Related to
Pension
Benefits
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at Balance at December 31, 2014$5,845
 $(2,181) $3,664
      
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, $(626)(1,159) 
 (1,159)
      
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(303)(564) 
 (564)
      
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $189
 349
 349
      
Balance at December 31, 20154,122
 (1,832) 2,290
      
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, $(2,007)(3,729) 
 (3,729)
      
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(293)(543) 
 (543)
      
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $58
 108
 108
      
Balance at December 31, 2016(150) (1,724) (1,874)
      
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $1223
 
 23
      
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(284)(528) 
 (528)
      
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(82)
 (152) (152)
      
Reclassification of stranded tax effects from tax rate change(141) (404) (545)
      
Balance at December 31, 2017$(796) $(2,280) $(3,076)

      

Unrealized

  

Adjustments

  

Accumulated

 
  

Net Unrealized

  

Losses on

  

Related to

  

Other

 
  

Gains (Losses)

  

Cash Flow

  

Pension

  

Comprehensive

 
  

on Securities

  

Hedges

  

Benefits

  

Income (Loss)

 

Balance at Balance at December 31, 2018

 $(3,973) $(624) $(1,238) $(5,835)

Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $2,005

  7,090   0   0   7,090 

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(59)

  (215)  0   0   (215)

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(394)

  0   (1,460)  0   (1,460)

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(1)

  0   0   (63)  (63)

Balance at December 31, 2019

  2,902   (2,084)  (1,301)  (483)

Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of tax, $1,557

  5,656   0   0   5,656 

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(176)

  (638)  0   0   (638)

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $(448)

  0   (1,762)  0   (1,762)

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $(77)

  0   0   (336)  (336)

Balance at December 31, 2020

  7,920   (3,846)  (1,637)  2,437 

Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, $(2,643)

  (9,593)  0   0   (9,593)

Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities, net of tax, $(7)

  (28)  0   0   (28)

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax, $434

  0   1,634   0   1,634 

Change in unfunded pension liability, net of tax, $115

  0   0   475   475 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $(1,701) $(2,212) $(1,162) $(5,075)

The following table provides information regarding reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Three Years Ending December 31, 2017

2021

Details about AOCI Components

 

Amount Reclassified from AOCI

 

Affected Line Item in the Statement of Where Net Income is Presented

  

Year Ended December 31,

  
  

2021

  

2020

  

2019

  

Available for sale securities:

             

Realized gain on sale of securities

 $35  $814  $274 

Securities gains, net

   (7)  (176)  (59)

Income taxes

  $28  $638  $215 

Net of tax

98

Details about AOCI ComponentsAmount Reclassified from AOCI 
Affected Line Item in the Statement of Where Net Income is Presented
 Years Ended December 31,  
 2017 2016 2015  
Available for sale securities:          
Realized gain on sale of securities$812
 $836
 $867
 Securities gains (losses), net
 (284) (293) (303) Income taxes
 $528
 $543
 $564
 Net of tax
        
Reclassification of stranded tax effects from tax rate change141
 
 
 *
        
Employee benefit plans:       
Reclassification of stranded tax effects from tax rate change404
 
 
 *
        
Total reclassifications$1,073
 $543
 $564
  
* Reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the impact


ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None


ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, 2017.2021. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20172021 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management regularly monitors its internal control over financial reporting, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on this evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C., has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, as stated in their report included herein.in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C. also audited the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.

/s/ Jeffrey V. Haley

Jeffrey V. Haley

President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ WilliamJeffrey W. TraynhamFarrar

William

Jeffrey W. TraynhamFarrar

Executive Vice President, and

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 9, 201814, 2022

ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 9C DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)

(a)(1)

Financial Statements.Statements and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 613).  See Item 8 for reference.

(a)(2)

Financial Statement Schedules.  All applicable financial statement schedules required under Regulation S-X have been included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(3)

Exhibits.  The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed below.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

Location

EXHIBIT INDEX

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated October 1, 2018, between American National Bankshares Inc. and HomeTown Bankshares Corporation

Exhibit No.2.1 on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2018

Description

Location

3.1

Articles of Incorporation, as amended

Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K filed July 5, 2011

3.2

Bylaws, as amended

Exhibit 3.2 on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2020

4.1

Description of American National Bankshares Inc.'s Securities

Filed herewith

10.1

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2022, by and among American National Bankshares Inc., American National Bank and Trust Company, and Jeffrey V. Haley

Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2022

10.2

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2022, by and among American National Bankshares Inc., American National Bank and Trust Company, and Jeffrey W. Farrar

Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2022

10.3

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2022, by and among American National Bankshares Inc., American National Bank and Trust Company, and Edward C. Martin

Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2022

10.4

Employment Agreement between American National Bank and Trust Company and John H. Settle, Jr. dated February 8, 2017

Exhibit 10.8 on Form 10-K filed March 8, 2019

10.5

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2022, by and between American National Bank and Trust Company and Rhonda P. Joyce

Filed herewith

   
2.110.6Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2022, by and Plan of Reorganization, as of August 24, 2014, between American National Bankshares Inc.Bank and MainStreet BankShares, Inc.Trust Company and Alexander JungExhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K filed August 28, 2014Filed herewith
   
3.110.7Articles of Incorporation, as amendedAmended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2022, by and between American National Bank and Trust Company and Charles T. Canaday, Jr.Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10-Q filed July 5, 2011Filed herewith
   
3.2

10.8

Bylaws, as amended

American National Bankshares Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan

Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 22, 2008, filed on March 14, 2008

10.9

American National Bankshares Inc. 2018 Equity Compensation Plan

Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 15, 2018, filed on April 12, 2018

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit 3.2No.

Description

Location

10.10

HomeTown Bank 2005 Stock Option Plan

Exhibit 4.0 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form 8-KS-8 to Form S-4 filed January 5, 2015April 1, 2019

10.110.11Deferred Compensation Agreement between American National Bank and Trust Company, and Charles H. Majors dated December 31, 2008Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2009
   
10.210.12Employment Agreement between American National Bankshares Inc. and Jeffrey V. Haley dated March 2, 2015Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2015
10.3Employment Agreement between American National Bankshares Inc. and William W. Traynham dated March 2, 2015Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2015
10.4Employment Agreement between American National Bankshares Inc. and H. Gregg Strader dated March 2, 2015Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-Q filed May 11, 2015
10.5Employment Agreement between American National Bank and Trust Company, and Charles T. Canaday, Jr., dated December 15, 2010Exhibit 10.9 on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed March 29, 2011
10.6Employment Agreement between American National Bank and Trust Company and Edward C. Martin dated September 21, 2016Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2016
10.7Executive Severance Agreement between American National Bankshares Inc., American National Bank and Trust Company, and Charles T. Canaday, Jr. dated December 15, 2010Exhibit 10.10 on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed March 29, 2011
10.8American National Bankshares Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive PlanExhibit 99.0 on Form S-8 filed May 30, 2008
10.9Adoption Agreement forRestated Virginia Bankers Association Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives of American National Bank &and Trust Company,Exhibit 10.11 on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2016

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.DescriptionLocation
11.1Filed herewith
   
21.110.13Filed herewith
   
23.1

10.14

Filed herewith

21.1

Subsidiaries of the registrant

Filed herewith

23.1

Consent of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.

Filed herewith

31.1

Filed herewith

31.2

Filed herewith

32.1

Filed herewith

32.2

Filed herewith

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

SBRLInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, formatted in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (included with Exhibit 101).

ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY

The registrant has not selected the option to provide the summary information of the Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 9, 201814, 2022

By:

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC.

By:

/s/  Jeffrey V. Haley

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 9, 2018.

14, 2022.

/s/  Jeffrey V. Haley

Director, President and

Jeffrey V. Haley

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

Jeffrey V. Haley

/s/  Charles H. Majors

Director and Chairman

/s/  Franklin W. Maddux

Director

Charles H. Majors

Franklin W. Maddux

/s/  Fred A. BlairNancy H. Agee

Director

/s/  Claude B. Owen, Jr.John H. Love

Director

Fred A. Blair

Nancy H. Agee

Claude B. Owen, Jr.

John H. Love

/s/  Frank C. Crist, Jr.Director/s/  Ronda M. PennDirector
Frank C. Crist, Jr.Ronda M. Penn
/s/  Michael P. HaleyDirector/s/  Dan M. PleasantDirector
Michael P. HaleyDan M. Pleasant
/s/  Charles S. HarrisDirector/s/  Joel R. ShepherdDirector
Charles S. HarrisJoel R. Shepherd
/s/  F. D. Hornaday, IIIDirector/s/  Tammy M. Finley 

Director

/s/  Ronda M. Penn

Director

F. D. Hornaday, IIITammy M. Finley  

Ronda M. Penn

/s/  John H. Love

Director

/s/ William W. Traynham

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)

John H. Love

/s/  Michael P. Haley

Director

William W. Traynham

/s/  Dan M. Pleasant

Director

Michael P. Haley

Dan M. Pleasant

/s/  Charles S. Harris

Director

/s/  Joel R. Shepherd

Director

Charles S. Harris

Joel R. Shepherd

/s/  F. D. Hornaday, III

Director

/s/  Susan K. Still

Director

F. D. Hornaday, III

Susan K. Still

/s/  Cathy W. Liles

Senior Vice President and

/s/  Jeffrey W. Farrar

Executive Vice President,

Cathy W. Liles

Chief Accounting Officer

(principal accounting officer)

Jeffrey W. Farrar

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

Cathy W. Liles

107
102