UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014January 30, 2016
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                           to                             
Commission file number 1-9595


BEST BUY CO., INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota 41-0907483
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
7601 Penn Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota
 
55423
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)  
Registrant's telephone number, including area code 612-291-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) o Yes x No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 3, 2013,1, 2015, was approximately $6.5$6.6 billion,, computed by reference to the price of $31.30$32.29 per share, the price at which the common equity was last sold on August 3, 2013,1, 2015, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange-Composite Index. (For purposes of this calculation all of the registrant's directors and executive officers are deemed affiliates of the registrant.)
As of March 24, 2014,21, 2016, the registrant had 347,043,619323,347,681 shares of its Common Stock issued and outstanding.


Table of Contents


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement dated on or about April 29, 2014 (to be filed pursuantrelating to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year-endis 2016 Regular Meeting of February 1, 2014), for the regular meeting of shareholders to be held on June 10, 2014Shareholders ("Proxy Statement"), are incorporated by reference into Part III. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), provide a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their companies. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements and may be identified by the use of words such as "anticipate," "assume," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "foresee," "outlook," "plan," "project," and other words and terms of similar meaning. Such statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. A variety of factors could cause our future results to differ materially from the anticipated results expressed in such forward-looking statements. Readers should review Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements.



BEST BUY    FISCAL    20142016    FORM    10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
  
 
   
 
   
 
 



Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.  Business.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms "we," "us" and "our" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to Best Buy Co., Inc. and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries.

Description of Business

We were incorporated in the state of Minnesota in 1966 as Sound of Music, Inc. Today, we are a multi-national, multi-channel retailer of technology products, including tablets and computers, televisions, mobile phones, large and small appliances, entertainment products, digital imaging and related accessories. We also offer technology services – including technical support, repair and installation – under the Geek Squad brand. We operate e-commerce operations, retail stores and call centers and conduct operations under a variety of names, such as Best Buy (BestBuy.com, BestBuy.ca), Best Buy Mobile, Five Star, Future Shop (FutureShop.ca), Geek Squad, Magnolia Audio Video and Pacific Sales. References Any references to our website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites.

Description of Business

We were incorporated in the state of Minnesota in 1966. Today, we are a leading provider of technology products, services and solutions. We offer these products and services to the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Information About Our Segments and Geographic Areas

During fiscal 2014, we operatedWe have two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of the operations in all states, districts and territories of the U.S., operating under various brand names including but not limited to, Best Buy, bestbuy.com, Best Buy Mobile, Best Buy Direct, Best Buy Express, Geek Squad, Magnolia Audio Video and Pacific Sales. We operate Best Buy Mobile stores-within-a-store and offer Geek Squad services in all of our U.S. Best Buy stores. In addition, we operate Magnolia Home Theater Magnolia Design Center and Pacific Kitchen and Home store-within-a-store experiences in select U.S. Best Buy stores, which we believe further enhance the unique product offerings and high-touch customer service provided in the stand-alone stores.

On February 1, 2014, we sold mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. (“mindSHIFT”). We had previously acquired mindSHIFT, a managed service provider for small and mid-sized businesses, in fiscal 2012.Home.

The International segment is comprised of: (i)of all operations in Canada operations, operatingand Mexico under the brand names Best Buy, bestbuy.com.ca, bestbuy.com.mx, Best Buy Mobile, Cell Shop, Connect Pro, Future Shop and Geek Squad; (ii) all China operations, operating under the brand names Five Star andExpress, Best Buy Mobile and (iii) all Mexico operations, operatingGeek Squad.

In March 2015, we decided to consolidate Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the brand names Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores and converting 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy Express and Geek Squad. We operate Best Buy Mobile store-within-a-store concepts in all Best Buy branded stores in Canada, as well as in select Five Star stores.brand.

Additional information on these changes is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In fiscal 2007, we acquired a 75% interest in Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Five Star”), one of China’s largest appliance and consumer electronics retailers. In fiscal 2009, we acquired the remaining 25% interest in Five Star. On December 3, 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell Five Star, and we completed the sale on February 13, 2015. In fiscal 2009, we acquired a 50% controlling interest in Best Buy Europe Distributions Limited (“Best Buy Europe”), a venture with Carphone Warehouse Group plc (“CPW”). On June 26, 2013, we sold our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe to CPW.

In order to align our fiscal reporting periods and comply with statutory filing requirements in certain foreign jurisdictions, we consolidate the financial results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a one-month lag. Consistent with such consolidation, the financial and non-financial information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relative to our Europe, China and Mexico operations is also presented on a one-month lag.

Financial information about our segments and geographic areas is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 12,11, Segment and Geographic Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Operations

Domestic Segment

Our Domestic segment isand International segments are managed by a Domestic leadership teamteams responsible for all areas of the business. The Domestic segment operates a multi-channelBoth segments operate an omni-channel platform that provides customers the ability to shop when and where they want, including online and in our retail stores.want.

Domestic Segment

4

TableDevelopment of Contents

Merchandise selection,merchandise and services offerings, pricing and promotions, procurement and supply chain, online and mobile application operations, marketing and advertising, and labor deployment across all channels are centrally controlledmanaged at our corporate headquarters. In addition, support capabilities (e.g.,(for example, human resources, finance and real estate management) are generally performed at our corporate headquarters. We also have field operations that support the store managers and retail store employees.teams. Our retail stores have procedures for inventory management, asset protection, transaction processing, customer relations, store administration, product sales and services, staff training and merchandise display that are largely standardized within each store brand. All stores within each store brand generally operate under standard procedures with a degree of flexibility for store management to address certain local market characteristics.

International Segment


Our International President is responsible for all areas
4

Table of our International segment. Leaders of our International businesses report directly to the International President.Contents

Our Canada and Mexico store operations are similar to those in our Domestic segment, with centrally controlled advertising, merchandise purchasingsegment.

In March 2015, we decided to consolidate Future Shop and pricing, and inventory policies. In addition, corporate management performs support capabilities. Similar to our U.S. Best Buy stores alland websites in Canada stores use a standardized operating system that includes procedures for inventory management, transaction processing, customer relations, store administration, staff training and merchandise display. The retail operations include two principal store brands.under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores have predominantly commissioned sales associates, whereas employees inand converting 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy branded stores in Canada, like employees in U.S. Best Buy stores, are noncommissioned.

Our Five Star stores primarily utilize vendor employees and full-time sales associates to sell our products. Corporate retail management generally controls advertising, merchandise purchasing and pricing, and inventory policies, although management for individual regions within our Five Star brand may vary these operations to adapt to local customer needs.

Our stores in Mexico employ an operating model similar to that used in our U.S. Best Buy stores.brand.

Merchandise and Services

Our Domestic Segment

Our online channel and U.S. retail storesInternational segments have offerings in six revenue categories: Consumer Electronics, Computing and Mobile Phones, Entertainment, Appliances, Services and Other. The key components of each revenue category are as follows:

Consumer Electronics consists primarily of television - home theater, home automation, digital imaging, health and home theater; digital camerasfitness and camcorders; DVD and Blu-ray players; portable electronics such as MP3 devices, headphones and speakers, car stereo, navigation and satellite radio; and all related accessories. The audio;
Computing and Mobile Phones revenue category includes notebook - computing and desktop computers,peripherals, networking, tablets, and e-Readers, mobile phones (including related mobile network carrier commissions), wearables (including smart watches) and related subscription service commissions, and all related accessories. The e-readers;
Entertainment revenue category includes video - gaming hardware and software, DVDs, Blu-rays, CDs, digital downloadsmovies, music, technology toys and computer software. The other software;
Appliances revenue category includes both large - major appliances (for example, refrigeration, dishwashers, ovens, laundry, etc.) and small appliances and kitchen and bath fixtures, including faucets, sinks, toilets and bathtubs. The (for example, coffee makers, blenders, etc.);
Services revenue category consists primarily of extended warranty service contracts, - consultation, design, delivery, installation, set-up, protection plans, repair, technical support product repair, delivery and installation. The educational classes; and
Other revenue category includes non-core offerings such as - snacks, beverages and beverages. The merchandise and service offerings vary across our stand-alone store portfolio, with U.S. Best Buy Mobile, Magnolia Audio Video and Pacific Sales stores offering a more focused assortment.other sundry items.

International Segment

In Canada, the Future Shop and Best Buy branded stores have offerings in Consumer Electronics, Computing and Mobile Phones, Entertainment, Services and Other, and at Future Shop only, Appliances. Although Future Shop and Best Buy branded stores in Canada offer similar products, there are differences in brands and depth of selection. Further, Geek Squad services are only available in the Best Buy branded stores, with Future Shop's service offerings branded as Connect Pro.

In China, our Five Star stores have offerings in four revenue categories: Appliances, Consumer Electronics, Computing and Mobile Phones and Services. The products and services in these revenue categories are similar to those of our Domestic segment.

Our stores in Mexico have offerings in six revenue categories: Consumer Electronics, Computing and Mobile Phones, Entertainment, Appliances, Services and Other, with products and services similar to those of our Domestic segment.


5

Table of Contents

Distribution

Domestic Segment

U.S. Best Buy online merchandise sales generally are typically either picked up at U.S. Best Buy stores or delivered directly to customers from a distribution center or beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, a retail store. The ship-from-store capability allows us to improve product availability and delivery times for customers. Most merchandise for our U.S. Best Buy, U.S. Best Buy Mobile, Magnolia Audio Video and Pacific Sales stores is shipped directly from manufacturers to our distribution centers or warehouses located throughout the U.S. In order to meet release dates for certain products, merchandise may be shipped directly to our stores from suppliers.

International Segment

Our distribution model for Canada stores' merchandiseand Mexico is shipped directly from our suppliers to our Canadian distribution centers. In order to meet release dates for certain products, merchandise may also be shipped directly to our stores from suppliers.

We receive our Five Star stores' merchandise at distribution centers and warehouses, the largest of which is located in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. Large merchandise, such as major appliances, is generally fulfilled directly to customers through our distribution centers and warehouses.

Our stores in Mexico have distribution methods similar to that of our U.S. Best Buy stores.Domestic segment model.

Suppliers and Inventory

Our Domestic and International segmentsegments purchase merchandise from a variety of suppliers. In fiscal 2014,2016, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 70%75% of the merchandise we purchased, with 5five suppliers – Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Sony and LG Electronics – representing approximately 45%51% of total merchandise purchased. We generally do not have long-term contracts with our major suppliers that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise.merchandise or any other terms.

We carefully monitor and manage our inventory levels to match quantities on hand with consumer demand as closely as possible. Key elements to our inventory management process include the following: continuous monitoring of historical and projected consumer demand, continuous monitoring and adjustment of inventory receipt levels, agreements with vendors relating to reimbursement for the cost of markdowns or sales incentives and agreements with vendors relating to return privileges for certain products.

We also have a global sourcing operation to design, develop, test and contract-manufacture our own line of exclusive brand products.

Store Development

We had approximately 1,200 large-format and 400 small-format stores at the end of fiscal 2016 throughout our Domestic Segment

During fiscal 2014, the number ofand International segments. Our stores we operated remained relatively flat, but we continued to evaluate how to best leverage our store portfolio. Most notably, we rolled out ship-from-store to more than 1,400 locations, opened 1,400 Samsung and 600 Windows stores-within-a-store, and completed the first phaseare a vital component of our store space optimization.omni-channel strategy and represent an important competitive advantage. In the U.S., we have the ability to ship from all of our Best Buy stores. Customers may also elect to pick up orders initiated online in any of our stores. In recent years, we have opened vendor store-within-a-store concepts to allow closer vendor partnership and a better quality customer experience. In fiscal 2015,2017 and beyond, we will continue to evaluatelook for opportunities to optimize our Domestic store portfolio, includingspace, renegotiating leases and selectively opening or closing locations as needed, to support our ongoing transformation.

5

Table of Contents

International Segment

In our International segment,March 2015, we opened 13 new stores and closed 27 stores in fiscal 2014. Store openings were primarily driven by Best Buy Mobile stores in Canadamade a decision to consolidate Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Mexico. Store closures were primarily driven by Five StarCanada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores in China. In fiscal 2015, we expectand converting 65 Future Shop stores to continue to review our portfolio of stores across all geographies.the Best Buy brand.

Refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for tables reconciling our Domestic and International segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years.


6

Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

We own or have the right to use valuable intellectual property such as trademarks, service marks and tradenames, including, but not limited to, Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Dynex, Five Star, Future Shop, Geek Squad, Init, Insignia, Magnolia, Modal, My Best Buy, Pacific Sales, Rocketfish,Plantinum and our Yellow Tag logo.

We have secured domestic and international trademark and service mark registrations for many of our brands. We have also secured patents for many of our inventions. We believe our intellectual property has significant value and is an important factor in the marketing of our company, our stores, our products and our websites.

Seasonality

Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. A higher proportion of our revenue and earnings is generated in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Working Capital

We fund our business operations through a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facilities are available for additional working capital needs, for general corporate purposes and investment and growth opportunities. Our working capital needs typically increase in the months leading up to the holiday shopping season as we purchase inventory in advance of expected sales.

Competition

Our competitors are primarily traditional store-based retailers, multi-channel retailers, internet-based businesses, technology service providers, traditional store-based retailers and vendors and mobile network carriers, who offer their products and services directly to the consumer.

customers. We believe our ability to deliver a high quality customer experience offers us a key competitive advantage. Some of our competitors have low cost operating structures and seek to compete for sales primarily on price. In addition, in the U.S., online-only operators are exempt from collecting sales taxes in certain states. We believe this advantage will continue to be eroded as sales tax rules are re-evaluated at both the state and federal levels. We carefully monitor pricing offered by other retailers, and investing inmaintaining price competitiveness is one of our ongoing priorities. In addition, we have a price-matching policy in the U.S. that allows customers to request that we match a price offered by certain retail store and online operators. In order to allow this, we are focused on maintaining efficient operations and leveraging the economies of scale available to us through our global vendor partnerships.

In addition to price, we believe our ability to deliver a high quality customer experience offers us a key competitive advantage. We believe our dedicated and knowledgeable people, integrated online and store channels,retail assets, broad product assortment, strong vendor relationships, range of focused service and support offerings, distinct store formats, brand marketing strategies and supply chain are important ways in which we maintain this advantage.

Environmental Matters

Best Buy is committed to positively impacting the environment and our communities. We are working to transform our company in many ways, including lesseningbelieve that effectively managing our environmental impact. In the U.S., consumers recycle more electronics through Best Buy than any other retailer. We set a goal to collect one billion poundsimpacts, setting sustainability goals and advancing energy-efficient consumer solutions creates long-term value for all of consumer electronics and appliances for recycling from June 2008 through December 2014. In fiscal 2014, we collected about 118 million pounds of consumer electronics and 112 million pounds of appliances, bringing our overall total to approximately 930 million pounds.stakeholders. 

We offer a large selection of energy-efficient products to help customers save money by using less energy. Our U.S. Best Buy customers purchased more than 20 million ENERGY STAR® certified products in fiscal 2014 and realized utility bill savings of more than $76 million. This energy saving equates to over 1 billion pounds of CO2 avoidance, or the equivalent of removing more than 98,000 cars from U.S. roads.

We are continuously workinglooking for cost-effective solutions to makeminimize carbon emissions in our stores and distribution centers more sustainable and to increase efficiency within our supply chain.operations. In calendar 2010,fiscal year 2016 we set a new goal of reducingto reduce our absoluteown carbon emissions in North America by 20%45 percent by the year 2020 (over a 2009 baseline). During fiscal 2014,, from both operational reductions and renewable sourcing.
See our retail stores, distribution centers and corporate offices reduced more than 15,000 metric tonsBest Buy Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report for further information on environmental performance.

Number of CO2 emissions through energy efficiency measures.Employees


76

Table of Contents

We are not aware of any federal, state or local provisions that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, that have materially affected, or are reasonably expected to materially affect, our net earnings or competitive position, or have resulted, or are reasonably expected to result in, material capital expenditures. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, for additional discussion.

Number of Employees

At the end of fiscal 2014,2016, we employed approximately 140,000125,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal employees worldwide.in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and our sourcing office in China. We consider our employee relations to be good. We offer our employees a wide array of company-paid benefits that vary within our company due to customary local practices and statutory requirements, which we believe are competitive locally and in the aggregate relative to others in our industry.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We make available, free of charge on our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these documents with, or furnish them to, the SEC. These documents are posted on our website at www.investors.bestbuy.com – select the "Financial Performance" link and then the "SEC Filings" link.. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet sitea website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as the Company, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

We also make available, free of charge on our website, our Amended and Restated By-laws, the Corporate Governance Principles of our Board of Directors ("Board") and our Code of Business Ethics (including any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Ethics) adopted by our Board, as well as the charters of all of our Board's committees: Audit Committee; Compensation and Human Resources Committee; Finance and Investment Policy Committee; and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee. These documents are posted on our website at www.investors.bestbuy.com – select the "Corporate Governance" link..

Copies of any of the above-referenced documents will also be made available, free of charge, upon written request to Best Buy Co., Inc. Investor Relations Department at 7601 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423-3645.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Described below are certain risks that we believe apply to our business and the industry in which we operate. You should carefully consider each of the following risk factors in conjunction with other information provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other public disclosures. The risks described below highlight potential events, trends or other circumstances that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity or access to sources of financing, and consequently, the market value of our common stock and debt instruments. These risks could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results and from guidance we may provide regarding our expectations of future financial performance. The risks described below are not an exhaustive list of all the risks we face. There may be others that we have not identified or that we have deemed to be immaterial. All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.

We face strong competition from traditional store-based retailers, multi-channel retailers, internet-based businesses, ourtechnology service providers, traditional store-based retailers and vendors and other forms of retail commerce,mobile network carriers, who offer their products and services directly to customers, which directly affects our salesrevenue and margins.profitability.

The retail business is highly competitive. Price is of primarygreat importance to most customers, and price transparency and comparability continues to increase, particularly as a result of digital tools.technology. The ability of consumers to compare prices on a real-time basis puts additional pressure on us to maintain competitive prices. We compete with many other local, regional, national and international retailers and technology service providers, as well as certain of our vendors and mobile network carriers who offer their products directly to consumers. Some of our competitors have greater market presence and financial resources than we do.us and may be able to offer lower prices than us for a sustained period of time. The retail industry continues to experience a trend towardtowards an increase in internet sales initiated online and using mobile applications, and some internet-onlyonline-only businesses have lower operating costs than us and are not required to collect and remit sales taxes in all U.S. states, which can negatively impact the ability of store-basedmulti-channel retailers to be price competitive. In addition, becausecompetitive on a tax-included basis. Online and multi-channel retailers continue to focus on delivery services, with customers increasingly seeking faster, guaranteed delivery times and low-price or free shipping. Our ability to be competitive on delivery times and delivery costs depends on many factors, and our failure to successfully manage these factors and offer competitive delivery options could negatively impact the demand for our products and our profit margins. Because our business strategy is based on offering superior levels of customer service utilizingand a multi-channel platform,full range of services to complement the products we offer, our cost structure is higher than some of our competitors. Changescompetitors, and this, in conjunction with price transparency, puts pressure on our margins.

7

Table of Contents


As these and related competitive factors evolve, we may experience material adverse pressure on our revenue and profitability.

Consumer electronics products are highly susceptible to technological advancement and changes in consumer preferences.

In general, consumer electronics product life cycles (which begin with initial market launch and conclude with maturity or obsolescence) have become shorter and less predictable. This is largely due to rapid technological advancement and innovation and generally faster adoption by consumers. Consumer preferences have also become susceptible to rapid change and this adds to the levelsunpredictability of our business. These factors affect us in a number of ways, for example:

the emergence of new products and categories (for example, wearable devices);
the rapid maturity and decline of relatively new categories (for example, tablets);
cannibalization of categories (for example, the effect of smart phones on demand for GPS, mobile audio, digital imaging devices, etc.);
intense consumer interest in high-profile product updates (for example, smartphone model updates) which concentrates purchasing activity around new launch dates;
unpredictable consumer adoption rates (for example, contrasting adoption rates of 3D and Ultra-HD televisions);
rapidly declining price-points in many categories (for example, digital imaging, Ultra-HD televisions, etc.); and
availability of content (for example, Ultra-HD programming, online streaming services, sporting events or other broadcast programming).

The effects of these variousfactors can also be exacerbated by the competitive environment and the ease with which customers can research and compare product features and price. If we fail to interpret, predict and react to these factors may havein a significant impact on consumer demand for ourtimely and effective manner, the consequences can include:

not offering the products and services that our customers want;
having excess inventory, which may require heavy discounting or liquidation;
not securing adequate access to brands or products for which consumer demand exceeds supply;
delays in adapting our merchandising, marketing or supply chain capabilities to accommodate changes in product trends; and
damage to our brand and reputation.

These and other similar factors could have a material adverse impact on our revenues and profitability.

Our reliance on key vendors and mobile network carriers subjects us to various risks and uncertainties which could affect our revenue and profitability.

We source the marginsproducts we sell from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. In fiscal 2016, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 75% of the merchandise we purchased (73% in fiscal 2015), with 5 suppliers – Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Sony and LG Electronics – representing approximately 51% of total merchandise purchased (47% in fiscal 2015). We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our vendors that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise or any other terms. Our profitability depends on us securing acceptable terms with our vendors for, among other things, the price of merchandise we purchase from them, funding for various forms of promotional programs, payment terms, allocations of merchandise, development of compelling assortments of products, operation of vendor-focused shopping experiences within our stores and terms covering returns and factory warranties. To varying degrees, our vendors may be able to leverage their competitive advantages -- for example, their financial strength, the strength of their brand with customers, their own stores or online channels or their relationships with other retailers -- to our commercial disadvantage, with a consequent adverse impact on our profitability. The potential adverse impact of these factors can generatebe amplified by price transparency (which can limit our flexibility to modify selling prices) and a highly competitive retail environment. Generally, our ability to negotiate favorable terms with our vendors is more difficult with vendors where our purchases represent a smaller proportion of their total revenues, consequently impacting our profitability from them.such vendor relationships.

We are also dependent on a relatively small number of mobile carriers to allow us to offer mobile devices with carrier connections. The competitive strategies utilized by mobile network carriers can have a material impact on our business. For example, if carriers change the structure of customer contracts, customer upgrade terms, customer qualification requirements, monthly fee plans, cancellation fees or service levels, the volume of upgrades and new contracts we sign with customers may be reduced, adversely affecting our revenues and profitability. In addition, our carriers also may serve customers through their own stores, websites, mobile applications and call centers or through other competing retail channels. Carriers may decide to

8

Table of Contents

Failurecease allowing us to anticipateoffer their contracts, focus their marketing efforts on alternative channels or make unfavorable changes to our commissions or other terms. Each of these potential factors could have a materially adverse impact on our revenue and respondprofitability.

We have internal standards that we require all of our vendors to changing consumer preferencesmeet. Our ability to find qualified vendors who meet our standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner can be a challenge, especially with respect to goods sourced from outside the U.S. Political or financial instability, merchandise quality issues, product safety concerns, trade restrictions, work stoppages, port delays, tariffs, foreign currency exchange rates, transportation capacity and costs, inflation, civil unrest, natural disasters, outbreaks of pandemics and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control. These and other issues affecting our vendors could result in a decline inmaterially adversely affect our sales.financial results.

Our success dependsfocus on our vendors' and our abilityservices as a strategic imperative exposes us to successfully introduce new products, services and technologies to consumers. The level of success we achieve is dependent on, among other factors, the frequency of product and service innovations, how accurately we predict consumer preferences, the level of consumer demand, the availability of merchandise, the related impact on the demand for existing products and the competitive environment. Consumers continue to have a wide variety of choices in terms of how and where they purchase the products and services we sell. Failure to accurately predict and adapt to constantly changing technology and consumer preferences, spending patterns and other lifestyle decisions,certain risks that could have a material adverse effectimpact on our revenuesrevenue and results of operations.profitability as well as our reputation.

SustainedOur customer promises include provision of a full range of services to complement our product offerings, including consultation, design, delivery, installation, set-up, protection plans, repair, technical support and educational classes. These services can differentiate us from many of our competitors and provide an opportunity to deliver superior customer service while generating incremental revenue and profit. However, designing, marketing and executing these services successfully and consistently is subject to incremental risks. These risks include, for example:

increased labor expense to fulfill our customer promises, which may be higher than the related revenue;
unpredictable warranty failure rates and related expenses;
employees in transit using company vehicles to visit customer locations and employees being present in customer homes; these factors may increase our scope of liability related to our employees' actions;
employees having access to customer devices, including the information held on those devices, which may increase our responsibility for the security of those devices and the data they hold; and
the engagement of third party contractors to assist with some aspects of construction and installation and the potential responsibility for the actions they take and for compliance with building codes and related regulations.

In addition, as customers increasingly migrate to websites and mobile applications to initiate transactions, it is inherently more difficult to demonstrate and explain the features and benefits of our service offerings, which can lead to a lower revenue mix of these services. If, for these or worsening economicother reasons, we fail to design and market services effectively to our customers or fail to meet our customers’ expectations in the execution of these services, our reputation, revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.

Macroeconomic pressures in the U.S. and key international markets could adversely affect consumer spending and our financial results.

For the past several years, we have experienced the impact of difficult and uncertain macroeconomic conditions in the geographic markets in which we operate. Some ofTo varying degrees, our products and services are viewed by some consumers to be discretionary items rather than necessities. As a result, our results of operations are sensitive to changes in macroeconomic conditions that impact consumer spending. As a result, consumers may be affected in many different ways, including, for example:

whether or not they make a purchase;
their choice of brand, model or price-point;
how frequently they upgrade their devices; and
their appetite for complementary services (for example, protection plans).

Consumer confidence, employment levels, oil prices, interest rates, tax rates, availability of consumer financing, housing market conditions, andforeign currency exchange rate fluctuations, costs for items such as fuel energy and food and other macroeconomic trends can adversely affect consumers' demand for the products and services that we offer. Our future results could be significantly adversely impacted by these factors.

Interruptions to our supply chain and other factors affecting our distribution may adversely affect our business.

Our supply chain is a critical part of our operations, particularly in light of recent industry trends and initiatives such as ship-from-store and the emphasis on fast and free delivery when purchasing online. We also depend on third parties for certain aspects of our supply chain network. In managing our supply chain we are exposed to the following risks, for example, which may not be fully controllable by us:

interruptions to our delivery capabilities;

9

Table of Contents

failure of third party companies to meet our standards or commitments;
disruptions to our systems and implementation of new systems;
limitations in capacity;
consolidation or other changes in the distribution market;
labor strikes or slow-downs impacting ports or any other aspect of our supply chain;
damages or other loss to products; and
costs that are excessive.

The risks associated with our dependence on third parties are greater for small parcel home deliveries, because of the relatively small number of carriers with the scope and capacity required by our business. The aforementioned channel shift increases our exposure to these risks. If we fail to manage these risks effectively, we could experience a material adverse impact on our reputation, revenue and profitability.

If we fail to attract, developretain and retainengage appropriately qualified employees, including employees in key positions, our business and operating results may be harmed.

Our performance is highly dependent on attracting, retaining and retainingengaging appropriately qualified employees, including our senior managementexecutive team and other employees in key employees.positions. Our strategy of offering high quality services and assistance for our customers requires a highly trained and engaged workforce. The turnover rate in the retail industry is relatively high, and there is an ongoing need to recruit and train new store employees. Factors that affect our ability to maintain sufficient numbers of qualified employees include employee morale, our reputation, unemployment rates, competition from other employers and our ability to offer appropriate compensation packages. Our inabilityFailure to recruit a sufficient number ofor retain qualified individuals or failure to retain key employees in the future may impair our efficiency and effectiveness and our ability to pursue growth opportunities. In addition, we have experienced a significant amount of turnover of senior managementour executive team or other employees in key positions with specific knowledge relating to us, our operations and our industry which turnover may negatively impact our operations.

Consumer demandDemand for the products and services we sell could decline if we fail to maintain positive brand perception and recognition.

We operate a global portfolio of brands with a commitment to customer service and innovation. We believe that recognition and the reputation of our brands are key to our success. The proliferationubiquity of web-based social media means that consumercustomer feedback and other information about our company are shared with a broad audience in a manner that is easily accessible and rapidly disseminated. Damage to the perception or reputation of our brands could result in declines in customer loyalty, decreases in gift card and service plan sales, lower employee retention and productivity, vendor relationship issues and other factors, all of which could materially affect our revenue and profitability.

Our success is dependent on the design and execution of appropriate business strategies.

We operate in a highly-competitive and ever-changing commercial environment. Our success is dependent on our ability to identify, develop and execute appropriate strategies.strategies within this environment. Strategies that have proved successful in the past may not be successful in the future. Our current strategy includes transformational change to manycertain areas of our business including our online and in-store customer experience, expanding our distribution system by shipping to customers from our stores, employee training and engagement, partnership with our vendors, retail execution and cost control. Achieving the goals we have set in a timely manner will be challenging, and itpursuit of new growth opportunities. It is possible that our strategies may prove to be ineffective and that we may need to make substantial changes to them in future periods.the future. It is also possible that we will be unsuccessful in executing our strategies or that the strategies we will implementthey expose us to additional risks or that strategies that have been successful in the past will fail to produce the desired results.risks. Our results could be materially adversely affected if we fail to designdevelop and execute appropriate strategies. The market value of our common stock and debt instruments could be materially adversely affected if investors are uncertain about the appropriateness of our strategies or our ability to execute them.


9

Table of Contents

Refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information regarding our strategies.

Failure to effectively manage our propertyreal estate portfolio may negatively impact our operating results.

As a multi-national retailer, effectiveEffective management of our large propertyreal estate portfolio is critical to our success.omni-channel strategy. We primarily secure properties through operating leases with third-party landlords. In light of the long-term nature of most of these commitments, it is essential that we effectively evaluate a range of factors that may influence our long-term real estate strategy. Such factors include, for example:

changing patterns of customer consumption and behavior, particularly in light of an evolving omni-channel environment;

10

Table of Contents

the appropriate number of stores in our portfolio;
the formats and sizes of our stores;
the locations of our stores;
the interior layouts of our stores;
the trade area demographics and economic data of each of our stores;
the local competitive positioning in and around our stores;
the primary term lease commitment for each store;
the long-term lease option coverage for each store;
the occupancy cost of our stores relative to market rents;
our supply chain network strategy; and
our ongoing network of service locations.

If we fail to effectively evaluate these factors, fail to negotiate appropriate terms which keep us market competitive, or if unforeseen changes arise, the consequences could include, for new leases we enter into, we may incur lease costs that are excessive and cause operating margins to be below acceptable levels. We may also make term commitments that are too long or too short, without the option to extend. The availability of suitable new property locations may also hinder our ability to maintain or grow our operations. Factors such as the condition of local property markets, availability of lease financing, taxes, zoning and environmental issues, and competitive actions may impact the availability for suitable property.example:

We have closedhaving to close stores and we may close additionalabandon the related assets, while retaining the financial commitments of the lease;
incurring significant costs to remodel or transform our stores;
having stores, supply chain or other facilities inservice locations that no longer meet the future. needs of our business; and
bearing excessive lease expenses.

These consequences could have a materially adverse impact on our profitability, cash flows and liquidity.

For leased property, the financial impact of exiting a propertylocation can vary greatly depending on, among other factors, the terms of the lease, the condition of the local propertyreal estate market, demand for the specific property, our relationship with the landlord and the availability of potential sub-lease tenants. It is difficult for us to influence some of these factors. If these factors are unfavorable to us, thenand the costs of exiting a property can be significant. WhenWe are still responsible for the maintenance, taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance charges for vacant properties until the lease commitment expires or is terminated. Similarly, when we enter into a contract with a tenant to sub-lease property, we remainusually retain our obligations as the master lessor. This leaves us at risk for any remaining liability in the event of default by the tenant and the impact of such defaults on our future results could be significant.sub-lease tenant.

Failure to effectively manage our costs could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

CertainSome of our operating costs are fixed and/or are subject to multi-year contracts. Some elements of our costs may be higher than our competitors, because, for example, of our differential service offerings or levels of customer service. As discussed above, our revenues are susceptible to volatility from various sources, which can lead to periods of flat or declining revenues. Accordingly, our ongoing drive to reduce cost structure are largely fixed in nature. Consumer spending remains uncertain, which makes it more challenging for us to maintain orand increase our operating income. The competitiveness in our industry and increasing price transparency mean that the focus on achieving efficient operations is greater than ever. Asefficiency represents a result, we must continuously focus on managing our cost structure.strategic imperative. Failure to successfully manage our laborcosts could have a material adverse impact on our profitability and benefit rates, advertising and marketing expenses, operating leases, other store expenses or indirect spending could severely impaircurtail our ability to maintainfund our price competitiveness while achieving acceptable levels of profitability.growth or other critical initiatives.

Our liquidity may be materially adversely affected by constraints in the capital markets or our vendor credit terms.

We need sufficient sources of liquidity to fund our working capital requirements, service our outstanding indebtedness and finance investmentbusiness opportunities. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be forced to curtail our operations, or we may not be able to pursue business opportunities. The principal sources of our liquidity are funds generated from operating activities, available cash and liquid investments, credit facilities, other debt arrangements and trade payables. Our liquidity could be materially adversely impacted if our vendors reduce payment terms and/or impose tighter credit limits. If our sources of liquidity do not satisfy our requirements, we may need to seek additional financing. The future availability of financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as economic and market conditions, the regulatory environment for banks and other financial institutions, the availability of credit and our credit ratings and our reputation with potential lenders. These factors could materially adversely affect our costs of borrowing and our ability to pursue growthbusiness opportunities, and threaten our ability to meet our obligations as they become due.

Changes in our credit ratings may limit our access to capital and materially increase our borrowing costs.

Our credit ratings and outlooks at January 30, 2016 are summarized below. In fiscal 2014,2016, Standard & Poor's Rating Services upgraded its long-term credit rating from BB to BB+ with a Stable outlook. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. maintainedupgraded its long-term credit rating atfrom Baa2 but revised its outlook from Developing to Negative.Baa1 with a Stable outlook. Fitch Ratings Ltd. and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services maintained theirLimited upgraded its long-term credit ratings at BB- andrating from BB respectively, and each revised its outlook from Negative to Stable.BBB- with a Stable outlook.

11

Table of Contents

Rating AgencyRatingOutlook
Standard and Poor'sBB+Stable
Moody'sBaa1Stable
FitchBBB-Stable

FutureAny future downgrades to our credit ratings and outlook could negatively impact our access to capital markets, the borrowing cost for future financings and the perception of our credit risk, by lenders and other third parties.thus our access to capital markets, borrowing costs, vendor terms and lease terms. Our credit ratings are based upon information furnished by us or obtained by a rating agency from its own sources and are subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal by one or more rating agencies at any time. Rating agencies may change the ratings assigned to us due to developments that are beyond our control, including the introduction of new rating practices and methodologies.

Any downgrade may result in higher interest costs for certainWe are highly dependent on the cash flows and net earnings we generate during our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season.
Approximately one-third of our credit facilitiesrevenue and could resultmore than one-half of our net earnings have historically been generated in higher interest costs on future financings.our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. In addition, downgrades may impactthe holiday shopping season also incorporates many other unpredictable factors, such as the level of promotional activity and customer buying patterns, and forecasting and reacting to these factors quickly is difficult. Unexpected events or developments such as natural or man-made disasters, product sourcing issues, failure or interruption of management information systems, or disruptions in services or systems provided or managed by third-party vendors could significantly disrupt our ability to obtain adequate financing, including via trade payables withoperations. As a result of these factors, there is a risk that our vendors. Customers' inclination to shop with us or purchase gift cards or extended warranties may also be affected by the publicity associated with deterioration of our credit ratings.fourth quarter and annual results are adversely affected.


10

Table of Contents

Failure to effectively manage strategic ventures, alliances or acquisitions could have a negative impact on our business.

From time to time, our strategy has involved, and may inIn the future, involve, enteringwe may decide to enter into new business ventures, and strategic alliances and makingor acquisitions. Assessing a potential opportunity can be based on assumptions that might not ultimately prove to be correct. In addition, the amount of information we can obtain about a potential opportunity may be limited, and we can give no assurance that new business ventures, strategic alliances and acquisitions will positively affect our financial performance or will perform as planned. limited.

The success of these opportunitiesventures, alliances or acquisitions is also largely dependent on the current and future participation, working relationship and strategic vision of the business venture or strategic alliance partners, which can change following a transaction. Integrating new businesses, stores andor concepts can be a difficult task. Cultural differences in some markets into which we may expand or into which we may introduce new retail concepts may not be as well received by customers as originally anticipated.and risky. These types of transactions may divert our capital and our management's attention from other business issues and opportunities and may also negatively impact our return on invested capital. Further, implementing strategicEntering into new ventures, alliances or business venturesacquisitions may also impair our relationships with our vendors or other strategic partners. We may not be able to successfully assimilate or integrate companiesbusinesses that we acquire, including their personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures. Weprocedures, or we may also encounter challenges in achieving appropriate internal control over financial reporting and deficiencies in information technology systems in connection with the integration of an acquired company. If we failreporting. Failure to assimilate or integrate acquired companies successfully, our business, reputation and operating results could suffer materially. Likewise, our failure toeffectively integrate and manage acquired companies successfullystrategic ventures, alliances and acquisitions could adversely affect our profitability and liquidity and may lead torequire impairment of the associated goodwill, and intangible asset balances.tradenames or other assets.

Failure to protect the integrity, security and confidentiality of our customers'employee and customer data including payment card information, could expose us to litigation costs and materially damage our standing with our employees or customers.

The use and handling of personally identifiable data by our business, our business associates and third parties is regulated at the state, federal and international levels. We are also contractually obligated to comply with certain industry standards regarding payment card information. Increasing costs associated with information security, such as increased investment in technology and qualified staff, the costs of compliance and costs resulting from consumer fraud could cause our business and results of operations to suffer materially. Additionally, the success of our online operations depends upon the secure transmission of customer and other confidential information over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. While we take significant steps to protect this information, lapses in our controls or the intentional or negligent actions of employees, business associates or third parties may undermine our security measures. As a result, unauthorized parties may obtain access to our data systems and misappropriate employee, customer and other confidential data. There can be no assurance that advancesAdvances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments willmay not prevent the compromise of our customer transaction processing capabilities and customer personal data. Furthermore, because the methods used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and may not be immediately detected, we may be unable to anticipate these methods or promptly implement preventative measures. Any such compromise of our security or the security of information residing with our business associates or third parties could have a material adverse effect on our reputation or our relationship with our employees, which may in turn have a negative impact on our revenue, and may expose us to material costs, penalties and compensation claims. In addition, any compromise of our data

12

Table of Contents

security may materially increase the costs we incur to protect against such breaches and could subject us to additional legal risk.

Our reliance on key vendors subjects us to various risks and uncertainties which could affect our operating results.

We source the products we sell from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. In fiscal 2014, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 70% of the merchandise we purchased, with 5 suppliers – Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Sony and LG Electronics – representing approximately 45% of total merchandise purchased. We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our major suppliers that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise. If there is a loss of or disruption in supply from any of our key vendors, if any of our key vendors fail to develop new technologies that consumers demand or if our vendors make changes that affect the timing of when customers are able to make purchases, our revenues and earnings may be materially adversely affected. In addition, the formation or strengthening of business partnerships between our vendors and our competitors could limit our access to merchandise.

We have internal standards that we require all of our vendors to meet. Our ability to find qualified vendors who meet our standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge, especially with respect to goods sourced from outside the U.S. Political or financial instability, merchandise quality issues, product safety concerns, trade restrictions, work stoppages, tariffs, foreign currency exchange rates, transportation capacity and costs, inflation, civil unrest, natural disasters, outbreaks of pandemics and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control. These and other issues affecting our vendors could materially adversely affect our financial results.


11

Table of Contents

Natural disasters, changes in climate, and geo-political events or other catastrophes could adversely affect our operating results.

The threatrisk or actual occurrence of one or more natural disasters or other extreme weathervarious catastrophic events whether as a result of climate change or otherwise, the threat or outbreak of terrorism, civil unrest or other hostilities or conflicts, could materially adversely affect our financial performance. TheseSuch events may result in damage tobe caused by, for example:

natural disasters or destructionextreme weather events;
diseases or closure of,epidemics that may affect our stores, distribution centers andemployees, customers or partners;
floods, fire or other properties. catastrophes affecting our properties; or
terrorism, civil unrest or other conflicts.

Such events can also adversely affect our work force and prevent employees and customers from reaching our stores and other properties can modify consumer purchasing patterns and decrease disposable income, and can disrupt or disable portions of our supply chain and distribution network. As a consequence of these or other catastrophic events, we may endure interruption to our operations or losses of property, equipment or inventory, which would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

Our exclusive brands products are subject to several additional product, supply chain and legal risks that could affect our operating results.

Sales of our exclusive brands products, which primarily include Insignia, Modal, Dynex, Init, Platinum and Rocketfish branded products, represent an important component of our revenue. Most of these products are manufactured by contractedcontract manufacturers based in southeastern Asia. This arrangement exposes us to the following additional potential risks, which could materially adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and operating results:

Wewe have greater exposure and responsibility to consumers for warranty replacements and repairs as a result of exclusive brand product defects, and our recourse to contractedcontract manufacturers for such warranty liabilities may be limited in foreign jurisdictions;
Wewe may be subject to regulatory compliance and/or product liability claims relating to personal injury, death or property damage caused by exclusive brand products, some of which may require us to take significant actions such as product recalls;
Wewe may experience disruptions in manufacturing or logistics due to inconsistent and unanticipated order patterns, our inability to develop long-term relationships with key factoriesmanufacturers or unforeseen natural disasters;
Wewe may not be able to locate manufacturers that meet our internal standards, whether for new exclusive brand products or for migration of the manufacturing of products from an existing manufacturer;
Wewe are subject to developing and often-changing labor and environmental laws for the manufacture of products in foreign countries, and we may be unable to conform to new rules or interpretations in a timely manner;
Wewe may be subject to claims by technology or other intellectual property owners if we inadvertently infringe upon their patents or other intellectual property rights, or if we fail to pay royalties owed on our exclusive brand products;
Wewe may be unable to obtain or adequately protect patents and other intellectual property rights on our exclusive brand products or manufacturing processes; and
Regulationsregulations regarding disclosure of efforts to identify the country of origin of “conflict minerals” in certain portions of our supply chain could increase the cost of doing business and, depending on the findings of our country of origin inquiry, could have an adverse effect on our reputation.

Maintaining consistent quality, availability and competitive pricing of our exclusive brands products helps us build and maintain customer loyalty, generate salesrevenue and achieve acceptable margins. Failure to maintain these factors could have a significant adverse impact on the demand for exclusive brand products and the marginsprofits we are able to generate from them.

We are subject to certain statutory, regulatory and legal developments which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Our statutory, regulatory and legal environments expose us to complex compliance and litigation risks that could materially adversely affect our operations and financial results.operations. The most significant compliance and litigation risks we face are:

Thethe difficulty of complying with sometimes conflicting statutes and regulations in local, national or international jurisdictions;

The
13

Table of Contents

the potential for unexpected costs related to compliance with new or existing environmental legislation or international agreements affecting energy, carbon emissions, electronics recycling and water or product materials;
ensuring compliance with applicable product compliance laws and regulations with respect to both the products we sell and contract to manufacture, including laws and regulation related to product safety and product transport;
the impact of new regulations governing data privacy and security, whether imposed as a result of increased cyber-security risks or otherwise;
the impact of other new or changing statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, financial reform, environmental requirements, National Labor Relations Board rule changes, health care reform, data privacy and cyber-security rules, corporate governance matters, escheatment rules and/or other as yet unknown legislation, that could affect how we operate and execute our strategies as well as alter our expense structure;
Thethe impact of changes in global tax laws (or interpretations thereof by courts and taxing authorities) and accounting standards; and
Thethe impact of litigation trends, including class action lawsuits involving consumers and shareholders, and labor and employment matters.


12

TableRegulatory activity focused on the retail industry has grown in recent years, increasing the risk of Contents

Defendingfines and additional operating costs associated with compliance. Additionally, defending against lawsuits and other proceedings may involve significant expense and divert management's attention and resources from other matters.

Changes to the National Labor Relations Act or other labor-related statutes or regulations could have an adverse impact on our costs and impair the viability of our operating model.

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) continually considers changesAs an employer of approximately 125,000 people in a large number of different jurisdictions, we are subject to laborrisks related to employment laws and regulations many of which could significantly impactincluding, for example:

unionization and related regulations that affect the nature of labor relations, the organization of unions and union elections; in the U.S. and how union organizing and union elections are conducted. The NLRB has stated it intendsthe National Labor Relations Board continually considers changes to attempt to make union organizing easier. The U.S. Departmentsuch regulations; as of Labor is considering new regulations requiring companies to publicly report the use and associated expense of external resources providing labor relations guidance and advice. As of February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, none of our U.S. operations had employees represented by labor unions or working under collective bargaining agreements. Changes in labor-related statutesagreements;
laws that impact the relationship between the company and independent contractors; and
laws that impact minimum wage and scheduling requirements, that could directly or regulations could increase the percentage of elections won by unions. If any segment of Best Buy’s operations became unionized, it couldindirectly increase our payroll costs and/or impact the level of doing business and adversely affect our operations.service we are able to provide.

Additional legislation or regulatory activityChanges to laws and regulations such as these could have a material adverseadversely impact on our costs or disruptreputation, our operations.ability to continue operations and thus our revenue and profitability.
Environmental legislation or other regulatory changes could impose unexpected costs or impact us more directly than other companies due to our operations as a global retailer. Specifically, environmental legislation or international agreements affecting energy, carbon emissions, electronics recycling and water or product materials are continually being explored by governing bodies. Increasing energy and fuel costs, supply chain disruptions and other potential risks to our business, as well as any significant rulemaking or passage of any such legislation, could materially increase the cost to transport our goods and materially adversely affect our results of operations. New regulations governing consumer privacy and security, whether imposed as a result of increased cyber security risks or otherwise, could materially increase our compliance costs. Regulatory activity focused on the retail industry has increased in recent years, increasing the risk of fines and additional operational costs associated with compliance.

Economic, regulatory and other developments could adversely affect the profitability of our credit card arrangements and ourability to offer attractive promotional financing offeringsto our customers and therefore our operating results.adversely affect the profits we generate from these programs.
 
We offer promotional financing throughand credit cards issued by a third-party bankbanks that managesmanage and directly extendsextend credit to our customers. The cardholdersCustomers choosing promotional financing can receive extended payment terms and low- or no-interest promotional financing on qualifying purchases. Promotional financing credit card sales account for approximately 19% of our revenue in fiscal 2014. We view these arrangementsour financing programs as a way to generate incremental salesrevenue of products and services from customers who prefer the financing terms to other available forms of payment, and incrementalpayment. Approximately 21% of our fiscal 2016 revenue was transacted using one of the company's branded cards. In addition, we earn profit-share income from the payments received from our banking partners. The profitability of our new credit card arrangement is more dependentpartners based on the performance of our credit card portfolio than our previous arrangement. Regulatory, legislative or economicthe programs. The income we earn in this regard is subject to numerous factors, including the volume and value of transactions, the terms of promotional financing offers, bad debt rates, interest rates, the regulatory and competitive environment and expenses of operating the program. Adverse changes to any of these factors could adversely affectimpair our ability to offer these programs to customers and reduce our ability to earn income from sharing in the performanceprofits of the portfolio, and this may have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
In addition, continuing changes in the economic and regulatory environment in the banking industry may lead banks to re-evaluate their strategies, practices and terms, including, but not limited to, the extent to which consumer credit is granted and the strategic focus on the retail partner credit card business. Promotional financing volumes could be materially adversely affected in response to substantial changes to our credit card program, such as substantial modifications to the terms and provisions of the program, or substantial adjustments to approval rates or the types of financing offered to our customers.

Our international activities subject us to risks associated with the legislative, judicial, regulatory, political, accounting and economic factors specific to the countries or regions in which we operate.
We have a presence in various foreign countries, including Bermuda, Canada, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Republic of Mauritius, the Netherlands, Taiwan, Turks and Caicos, and the U.K. During fiscal 2014, our International segment's operations generated 16% of our revenue. Our future operating results in these countries and in other countries or regions throughout the world where we may operate in the future could be materially adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including political conditions, economic conditions, legal and regulatory constraints, foreign trade rules and monetary and fiscal policies (both of the U.S. and of other countries). In addition, foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an impact on our future revenues, earnings and cash flows from International operations, and could materially adversely affect our reported financial performance.

13

Table of Contents

Our International segment's operations face other risks as well, including the costs and difficulties of managing international operations, greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights in countries other than the U.S., and potential adverse tax consequences. The various risks inherent in doing business in the U.S. generally also exist when doing business outside of the U.S., and may be exaggerated by the complexity of operating in numerous sovereign jurisdictions due to differences in culture, laws and regulations. There is a heightened risk that we misjudge the response of consumers in foreign markets to our product and service assortments, marketing and promotional strategy and store and website designs, among other factors, and this could adversely impact the results of these operations and the viability of these ventures.programs.
 
We rely heavily on our management information technology systems for our key business processes. Any failure or interruption in these systems could have a material adverse impact on our business.
 
The effective and efficient operation of our business is dependent on our management information systems. We rely heavily on our management information systems to manage all key aspects of our business, including demand forecasting, purchasing, supply chain management, point-of-sale processing, services fulfillment, staff planning and deployment, website offerings, financial management, reporting and forecasting and safeguarding critical and sensitive information. The failure of our management information systems to perform as we anticipate (whether from internal or external factors), or to meet the continuously evolving needs of our business, could significantly disrupt our business and cause, for example, higher costs and lost revenues and could threaten our ability to remain in operation.

14

Table of Contents


We utilize complex information technology platforms to operate our websites and mobile applications. Disruptions to these services, such as those caused by unforeseen traffic levels or other technical difficulties, could cause us to forego material revenues and adversely affect our reputation with consumers.
 
We rely onutilize third-party vendors for certain aspects of our business operations.
 
We engage key third-party business partners to managesupport various functions of our business, including but not limited to, information technology, web hosting and cloud-based services, human resource operations, customer loyalty programs, promotional financing and customer loyalty credit cards, gift cards, customer warranty, technical support and insurance programs. Any material disruption in our relationship with key third-party business partners or any disruption in the services or systems provided or managed by third parties could impact our revenues and cost structure and hinder our ability to continue operations, particularly if a disruption occurs during peak revenue periods.

Our international activities are subject to many of the same risks as described above, as well as to risks associated with the legislative, judicial, regulatory, political and economic factors specific to the countries or regions in which we operate.
 
We are highly dependent on the cash flows and net earnings we generate during our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season.
Approximately one-third of our revenue and more than one-half of our net earnings have historically been generatedoperate retail locations in our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Unexpected events or developments such as natural or man-made disasters, product sourcing issues, failure or interruptionIn addition, we have wholly owned legal entities registered in various other foreign countries, including Bermuda, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, the Republic of management information systems, disruptions in services or systems provided or managed by third-party vendors or adverse Mauritius, the Netherlands, Taiwan, Turks and Caicos, and the U.K. During fiscal 2016, our International segment's operations generated 8% of our revenue. In general, the risk factors identified above also have relevance to our International operations. In addition, our International operations also expose us to other risks, including those related to, for example:

political conditions;
economic conditions, including monetary and fiscal policies and tax rules;
legal and regulatory environments;
rules governing international trade and ownership of foreign entities;
risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates;
cultural differences that we may be unable to anticipate or respond to appropriately;
difficulties in enforcing intellectual property rights; and
difficulties encountered in exerting appropriate management oversight to operations in remote locations.
These factors could significantly disrupt our fourth fiscal quarter couldInternational operations and have a material adverse effect on our annual results of operations.revenue and profitability and could lead to us incurring material impairments and other exit costs.

Our revenues and margins are highly sensitive to developments in products and services.
The consumer electronics industry involves constant innovation and evolution of products and services offered to consumers. The following examples demonstrate the impact this can have on our business:
New product categories such as tablets and e-readers have grown rapidly and fundamentally changed the market for mobile computing devices; however, as products reach maturity and/or markets become saturated, demands levels can fall sharply;
Product convergence has significantly impacted the demand for some products; for example, the growth of increasingly sophisticated smartphones has reduced the demand for separate cameras, gaming systems, music players and GPS devices;
The timing of new product introductions and updates can have a dramatic impact on the timing of revenues; for example, the introduction of new gaming systems can produce high demand levels for hardware and the accompanying software, which may be followed by several years of decline in demand;
Delivery models for some products are affected by technological advances and new product innovations; for example, media such as music, video and gaming is increasingly transferring to digital delivery methods that may reduce the need for physical CD, DVD, Blu-ray and gaming products; and
Disruptions in the availability of content (such as sporting events or other broadcast programming) may influence the demand for hardware that our customers purchase to access such content, as well as the commission we receive from service providers.

Many of the factors described above are not controllable by us. The factors can have a material adverse impact on our relevance to the consumer and the demand for products and services we have traditionally offered. It is possible that these and similar changes could materially affect our revenues and profitability.

14

Table of Contents

Failure to meet the financial performance guidance or other forward-looking statements we have provided to the public could result in a decline in our stock price.
 
We may provide public guidance on our expected financial results or other forward-looking information for future periods. Although we believe that this guidance provides investors and analysts with a better understanding of management's expectations for the future and is useful to our stockholdersexisting and potential stockholders, such guidance is comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed the guidance we have provided. If our financial results for a particular period do not meet our guidance or the expectations of investment analystsmarket participants or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.


15

Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties.
Stores, Distribution Centers and Corporate Facilities
Domestic Segment
The following table summarizes the location and total square footage of our Domestic segment stores at the end of fiscal 20142016:
 
U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 
U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand-Alone Stores
 
Pacific Sales
Stores
 
Magnolia
Audio
Video Stores
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand-Alone Stores
 Pacific Sales
Stores
Alabama 15
 6
 
 
 15
 5
 
Alaska 2
 
 
 
 2
 
 
Arizona 24
 2
 
 
 24
 2
 
Arkansas 9
 5
 
 
 9
 5
 
California 119
 30
 30
 2
 118
 26
 28
Colorado 22
 5
 
 
 21
 5
 
Connecticut 12
 6
 
 
 12
 5
 
Delaware 4
 1
 
 
 4
 1
 
District of Columbia 2
 1
 
 
 2
 
 
Florida 65
 50
 
 
 64
 32
 
Georgia 28
 10
 
 
 28
 10
 
Hawaii 2
 
 
 
 2
 
 
Idaho 5
 2
 
 
 5
 2
 
Illinois 51
 16
 
 
 50
 14
 
Indiana 23
 11
 
 
 23
 11
 
Iowa 13
 1
 
 
 13
 1
 
Kansas 9
 4
 
 
 9
 3
 
Kentucky 9
 7
 
 
 9
 7
 
Louisiana 16
 7
 
 
 16
 4
 
Maine 5
 
 
 
 5
 
 
Maryland 23
 13
 
 
 23
 12
 
Massachusetts 27
 12
 
 
 24
 10
 
Michigan 34
 11
 
 
 32
 11
 
Minnesota 23
 15
 
 
 23
 11
 
Mississippi 9
 2
 
 
 8
 2
 
Missouri 20
 11
 
 
 19
 10
 
Montana 3
 
 
 
 3
 
 
Nebraska 5
 3
 
 
 5
 3
 
Nevada 10
 4
 
 
 10
 4
 
New Hampshire 6
 4
 
 
 6
 3
 
New Jersey 27
 11
 
 
 27
 11
 
New Mexico 5
 3
 
 
 5
 3
 
New York 54
 15
 
 
 54
 15
 
North Carolina 32
 15
 
 
 32
 12
 
North Dakota 4
 1
 
 
 4
 1
 
Ohio 37
 12
 
 
 37
 11
 
Oklahoma 13
 4
 
 
 13
 4
 
Oregon 12
 3
 
 
 12
 3
 
Pennsylvania 38
 14
 
 
 37
 14
 
Puerto Rico 3
 
 
 
 3
 
 
Rhode Island 1
 
 
 
 1
 
 
South Carolina 15
 4
 
 
 15
 4
 
South Dakota 2
 1
 
 
 2
 1
 
Tennessee 16
 9
 
 
 16
 9
 
Texas 108
 40
 
 
 103
 33
 
Utah 10
 
 
 
 10
 
 
Vermont 1
 
 
 
 1
 
 
Virginia 34
 11
 
 
 34
 10
 
Washington 19
 12
 
 2
 19
 8
 
West Virginia 5
 
 
 
 5
 
 
Wisconsin 23
 11
 
 
 22
 11
 
Wyoming 1
 1
 
 
 1
 1
 
Total 1,055
 406
 30
 4
 1,037
 350
 28
      
Square footage (in thousands) 39,999
 480
 737
Average square feet per store (in thousands) 39
 1
 26



16

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the ownership status and total square footage of our Domestic segment store locations at the end of fiscal 20142016:
 
U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 
U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand-Alone Stores
 
Pacific Sales
Stores
 
Magnolia
Audio
Video Stores
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand Alone Stores
 Pacific Sales
Stores
Owned store locations 25
 
 
 
 25
 
 
Owned buildings and leased land 37
 
 
 
 36
 
 
Leased store locations 993
 406
 30
 4
 976
 350
 28
Square footage (in thousands) 40,640
 588
 772
 51

The following table summarizes the location, ownership status and total square footage of space utilized for distribution centers, service centers and corporate offices of our Domestic segment at the end of fiscal 20142016:
   Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)
 Location Leased Owned Location Leased Owned
Distribution centers 23 locations in 17 U.S. states 7,480
 3,183
 23 locations in 17 U.S. states 7,489
 3,168
Geek Squad service center(1)
 Louisville, Kentucky 237
 
Geek Squad service centers(1)
 Louisville, Kentucky 237
 
Principal corporate headquarters(2)
 Richfield, Minnesota 
 1,452
 Richfield, Minnesota 
 1,452
Territory field offices 26 locations throughout the U.S. 154
 
 12 locations throughout the U.S. 104
 
Pacific Sales corporate office space Torrance, California 15
 
 Torrance, California 12
 
(1)The leased space utilized by our Geek Squad operations is used primarily to service notebook and desktop computers.
(2)Our principal corporate headquarters consists of four interconnected buildings. Certain vendors who provide us with a variety of corporate services occupy a portion of our principal corporate headquarters. We also sublease a portion of our principal corporate headquarters to unaffiliated third parties.

International Segment

The following table summarizes the location and total square footage of our International segment continuing operations stores at the end of fiscal 20142016:
Canada China Mexico
Future Shop
Stores
 
Best Buy
Stores
 
Best Buy Mobile
Stand-Alone Stores
 
Five Star
Stores
 
Best Buy
Stores
 
Best Buy
Express Stores
Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Express
Stores
Canada                
Alberta17
 12
 9
 
 
 
19
 9
 
British Columbia22
 9
 10
 
 
 
22
 10
 
Manitoba4
 2
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
New Brunswick3
 
 
 
 
 
3
 
 
Newfoundland1
 1
 
 
 
 
1
 
 
Nova Scotia6
 2
 1
 
 
 
3
 1
 
Ontario53
 33
 30
 
 
 
55
 30
 
Prince Edward Island1
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
 
Quebec27
 11
 6
 
 
 
24
 6
 
Saskatchewan3
 2
 
 
 
 
4
 
 
China           
Anhui
 
 
 18
 
 
Henan
 
 
 11
 
 
Jiangsu
 
 
 121
 
 
Shandong
 
 
 9
 
 
Sichuan
 
 
 7
 
 
Yunnan
 
 
 6
 
 
Zhejiang
 
 
 17
 
 
     
Square footage (in thousands)3,848
 52
 
Average square feet per store (in thousands)28
 1
 
     
Mexico                
Coahuila
 
 1
Estado de Mexico
 
 
 
 3
 
3
 
 1
Distrito Federal
 
 
 
 7
 1
7
 
 3
Jalisco
 
 
 
 4
 
4
 
 
Nuevo Leon
 
 
 
 1
 1
2
 
 1
Michoacan
 
 
 
 1
 
1
 
 
San Luis Potosi
 
 
 
 1
 
1
 
 
Total137
 72
 56
 189
 17
 2
     
Square footage (in thousands)634
 
 9
Average square feet per store (in thousands)35
 
 2
     
Total store count154
 56
 6


17

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the ownership status and total square footage of our International segment continuing operations store locations at the end of fiscal 20142016:
Canada China MexicoCanada Mexico
Future Shop
Stores
 
Best Buy
Stores
 
Best Buy Mobile
Stand-Alone Stores
 
Five Star
Stores
 
Best Buy
Stores
 
Best Buy
Express Stores
Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy Express Stores
Owned store locations
 3
 
 7
 
 
3
 
 
 
Leased store locations137
 69
 56
 182
 17
 2
133
 56
 18
 6
Square footage (in thousands)3,609
 2,293
 52
 6,236
 678
 4

The following table summarizes the location, ownership status and total square footage of space utilized for distribution centers and corporate offices of our International segment continuing operations at the end of fiscal 20142016:
  Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)  Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)
Distribution Centers Leased Owned Principal Corporate Offices Leased OwnedDistribution Centers Leased Owned Principal Corporate Offices Leased Owned
CanadaBrampton and Bolton, Ontario 1,685
 
 Burnaby, British Columbia 141
 
Brampton and Bolton, Ontario 1,685
 
 Burnaby, British Columbia 141
 
Vancouver, British Columbia 639
 
    Vancouver, British Columbia 439
 
    
Five StarJiangsu Province, China 1,255
 
 Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China (corporate office) 23
 46
Throughout the Five Star retail chain 673
 
 District offices throughout the Five Star retail chain 169
 
MexicoEstado de Mexico, Mexico 89
 
 Distrito Federal, Mexico 32
 
Estado de Mexico, Mexico 89
 
 Distrito Federal, Mexico 32
 

Exclusive Brands

We lease approximately 61,000 square feet of office space in China to support our exclusive brands operations.

Operating Leases

Almost all of our stores and a majority of our distribution facilities are leased. Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 9,8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 13,12, Contingencies and Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


18

Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant
(As of March 24, 201421, 2016)

Name Age Position With the Company 
Years
With the
Company
 Age Position With the Company 
Years
With the
Company
Hubert Joly 54 President and Chief Executive Officer 1 56 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 3
Sharon L. McCollam 51 Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer 1 53 Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer 3
Paula F. Baker 48 Chief Human Resources Officer 12
Shari L. Ballard 47 President, International and Chief Human Resources Officer 21 49 President, U.S. Retail 23
Jude C. Buckley 43 Chief Commercial Officer 7
R. Michael Mohan 46 Chief Merchandising Officer 10
Mary Lou Kelley 55 President, E-commerce 2
R. Michael (Mike) Mohan 48 Chief Merchandising Officer 12
Keith J. Nelsen 50 General Counsel and Secretary 8 52 General Counsel and Secretary 10
Greg Revelle 38 Chief Marketing Officer 1
Mathew R. Watson 45 Chief Accounting Officer 10

Hubert Jolywas appointed President is chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOfficer. Since joining Best Buy in September 2012, Mr. Joly has led the company’s Renew Blue transformation. As a result, Best Buy has delivered improved domestic comparative sales and profit; an increase in customer satisfaction and employee morale; an enhanced in-store experience with the addition of thousands of shops-in-shop developed in partnership with many of the world’s leading technology companies; and, a Director in September 2012. Mr. Joly was previously the president and chief executive officer of Carlson, Inc., a worldwide hospitality and travel company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, from 2008 until his current appointment. Prior to becoming chief executive officer of Carlson,richer online shopping experience on BestBuy.com. Before joining Best Buy, Mr. Joly was president and chief executive officerCEO of Carlson, Inc., a global hospitality and travel company, from 2008 until he joined us. He previously led Carlson Wagonlit Travel a business travel management company, from 2004 until 2008. Heas its CEO, and held several senior executiveleadership positions withat Vivendi S.A., a French multinational mediaUniversal Games and telecommunications company, from 1999 to 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Joly worked in the technology sector at Electronic Data Systems (now part of Hewlett-Packard Company) from 1996 to 1999, and at McKinsey & Company, Inc. from 1983 to 1996. Mr. Joly is currently a member ofSystems’ French business. He serves on the board of directorsboards of Ralph Lauren Corporation, a leader in the design, marketing and retailing of premier lifestyle products. He also serves on the board of directors forCorp., the Retail Industry Leaders Association the board of trustees of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts and the executive committee of the Minnesota Business Partnership. Mr. JolyHe previously served as a directoron the boards of Carlson, Inc.; chair of the board of directors of, the Rezidor Hotel Group; chair of the board of directors ofGroup and Carlson Wagonlit Travel; chair of the Travel Facilitation Sub-Committee of the U.S. Department of Commerce Travel and Tourism Advisory Board; on the executive committee of the World Travel and Tourism Council, and on the board of overseers of the Carlson School of Management.Travel.

Sharon L. McCollam was appointed Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer in December 2012. In this role, she leads our global finance, information technology, information security, supply chain, logistics, real estate, procurement, enterprise fraud,customer care, pricing, and internal audit and growth initiative functions.functions, as well as our Mexico operations. Ms. McCollam was previously executive vice president, chief operating officerExecutive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and chief financial officerChief Financial Officer of Williams-Sonoma Inc., a premier specialty retailer of home furnishings, from July 2006 until her retirement in March 2012. At Williams-Sonoma, she was responsible for the long-term strategic planning activities of the company and oversaw multiple key functions, including global finance, treasury, investor relations, information technology, real estate, store development, corporate operations and human resources. Ms. McCollam also held various executive leadership roles, including principal accounting officer, at Williams-Sonoma from March 2000 to July 2006. Prior to her time at Williams-Sonoma, Ms. McCollam served as chief financial officerChief Financial Officer of Dole Fresh Vegetables Inc. from 1996 to 2000 and in various other finance-related leadership positions at Dole Food Company Inc., a producer and marketer of fresh fruit and vegetables, from 1993 to 1996. Ms. McCollam serves as a member of the board of directors for Sutter Health, a nonprofit network of hospitals and doctors in Northern California; Art.com, an online specialty art retailer; and Privalia Venta Directa, s.a., a European e-commerce apparel retailer. Ms. McCollam previously served as a member of the board of directors of OfficeMax Incorporated, Williams-Sonoma, and Del Monte Foods Company.

Shari L. BallardPaula F. Baker was named President, International andis the Chief Human Resources Officer, effective March 2016. In her role, Ms. Baker oversees talent development and the health and well-being of the more than 125,000 Best Buy employees worldwide. Ms. Baker has a proven track record of leading teams that drove stellar financial and customer performance results. She has served in 2013. She leads our international businessa variety of retail and human resources function. Previously,leadership roles since joining the company in 2004. Most recently, she served as Executive Vice Presidentwas territory vice president for the Southeast region of the United States since 2012, responsible for 172 stores and President, Internationalmore than 10,000 employees. Prior to that, Ms. Baker was a territory human resources director from 2012 to 2013; as Executive Vice President, President – Americas from March 2010 to 2012; Executive Vice President – Retail Channel Management2012. In that role, she built strong business partnerships that helped create a culture of engagement, reduced turnover, succession planning and talent development that led to company-leading business performance. She has also previously held district manager and general manager roles. Before joining Best Buy, Ms. Baker worked at Books-A-Million, Golfsmith International and St. Andrews Golf Company in retail leadership roles. She received her bachelor’s degree in accounting/finance from 2007 to 2010; and as Executive Vice President – Human Resources and Legal from 2004 to 2007. Ms. Ballard joined us in 1993 and has served as Senior Vice President, Vice President, and General and Assistant Store Manager. Ms. Ballard is a member of the Minneapolis Institute of Arts board of trustees and the University of Minnesota FoundationNevada-Las Vegas. She serves as a board member for the Best Buy PAC and for Girls Incorporated of trustees. She also serves on the board of directors of the Delhaize Group, a Belgian international food retailer.Greater Atlanta.

Jude C. Buckley was appointed our Chief Commercial Officer in January 2014. In this role, he oversees all of our marketing functions, including floor space optimization and promotions. He previously served as President, Mobility/Connectivity since June 2013 until his current appointment; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Connectivity Business Group from November 2012 to June 2013; Senior Vice President and Head Merchant, Best Buy Mobile from January 2010 to November 2012, and Vice President, Best Buy Mobile from July 2007 to December 2009. He joined Best Buy in 2007, coming from the


19

Table of Contents

Carphone WarehouseShari L. Ballard is the President of U.S. Retail. In her role, she is responsible for all domestic Best Buy stores. Ms. Ballard is a seasoned executive with deep retail experience. After graduating with a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan - Flint, she was hired in 1993 to work in a local Best Buy store, beginning as an assistant store manager and rising to general manager. After a variety of retail leadership roles, she was promoted to executive vice president of human resources and legal in 2004. In 2007, Ms. Ballard assumed responsibility for Best Buy stores in the United States, focusing her energies on deepening customer relationships and better utilizing the full range of talent and resources that reside within the company’s stores to drive growth. She was promoted to president of Americas, U.S. and Mexico in 2010, and, two years later, she was appointed president of international, overseeing business and the transformation efforts in Canada, China, Europe, and Mexico. In April 2014, Ms. Ballard assumed the role of president of U.S. retail and a few months later, began a dual role to include Chief Human Resources Officer, a position allowing her to leverage her broad experience, expertise and knowledge of the company and its employees. Ms. Ballard serves on the Board of Directors of the Delhaize Group plcand the University of Minnesota Foundation.

Mary Lou Kelley is the President of E-commerce, having joined us in Sweden, where he was a managing director2014. In this role, Ms. Kelley leads the company’s overall digital strategy and is charged with advancing Best Buy’s global e-commerce vision and retail omni-channel capabilities.  She is responsible for seven years.all of Best Buy’s global e-commerce channels, including bestbuy.com and the company’s highly-rated mobile applications. Ms. Kelley has extensive experience in retail e-commerce. Prior to his servicejoining Best Buy, she was the Senior Vice President E-commerce from 2010 to 2014 for Chico’s FAS where she was responsible for the direct-to-consumer business for its three brands, Chico’s, White House Black Market and Soma Intimates. Ms. Kelley has over 25 years experience in retail, e-commerce, marketing, and strategic planning, including nine years with L.L.Bean, Inc., primarily as its Vice President of E-commerce. Prior to L.L.Bean, Ms. Kelley held positions of increasing leadership with McKinsey and Company and Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc. Her earlier career experience included stints with Sears and other small multi-channel retailers. Ms. Kelley holds a B.A. in economics from Boston College and an MBA from the Darden Graduate School of Business at Carphone Warehouse Group plc, he was a managing director with Mviva in London from 2000 to 2001, investment banker with Nomura International Investment Bank in London from 1997 to 1999,the University of Virginia. She serves on the boards of Vera Bradley, the women’s handbags and a tax accountant in Brisbane, Australia with Bernays Brown Chartered Accountants from 1992 to 1997.accessories brand, and the Minnesota Orchestra.

R. Michael “Mike”(Mike) Mohan was appointed ouris the Chief Merchandising Officer in January 2014. In this role, he managesOfficer. He is responsible for the category management and merchandising functions for ourBest Buy’s U.S. business, including ourtheir largest market, reporting directly into Hubert Joly, Chairman and CEO. In this capacity, Mr. Mohan uses his 25 years of retail and management experience to build actionable business plans that drive business growth, profitability, market share gains, increased employee and customer satisfaction for Best Buy. Specifically, Mr. Mohan oversees all category growth strategies,strategy, merchandising, purchasing, vendor relationships,relations, financial planning and end-of-life product disposition, inclusive of Pacific Kitchen & Bath, Magnolia and Best Buy Mobile operations, both the standalone stores and store-within-a-store formats. He also oversees the global private label product business, and assortment. Previously,the business sales channel at the company. Mr. Mohan joined Best Buy in February 2004 as vice president of the digital imaging business group, assuming additional responsibilities through his career, covering nearly all product/business categories at Best Buy, becoming an enterprise senior vice president in April 2008, and the president of the home business group in January 2013. He was appointed to chief merchandising officer in January 2014. Before joining Best Buy, Mr. Mohan served as President, Home since June 2013 until his current appointment; Senior Vice President, General Manager – Home Business Group from 2011 to June 2013; Senior Vice President, Home Theatre from 2008 to 2011; and Vice President, Home Entertainment from 2006 to 2008. Prior to joining Best Buy in 2004 as Vice President, Digital Imaging, Mr. Mohan was vice president and general merchandisingmerchandise manager for Good Guys, an audio/video specialty retailer with 79 stores in the western United States. Mr. MohanHe also previously workedserved in various positions at Future Shop in Canada from 1988 to 1997, prior to our acquisition of the company, where he served in various merchandising roles.through 1997. Mr. Mohan serveshas served as a member of the board of directorsindustry leaders for the Consumer Electronics Association Board of Industry Leaders and was appointed as a trustee to Boys & Girls Club of America in March 2014.since October 2013.

Keith J. Nelsenhas served as our General Counsel and Secretary since 2011. In this role, he manages our enterprise legal and risk management functions, as well as acts as Secretary to our Board of Directors. Previously, in addition to his current role, he also served as Chief Risk Officer from 2012 to 2013. He was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel in May 2011 and Secretary of the Company in June 2011 and served as Senior Vice President, Commercial and International General Counsel from 2008 until his current appointment. Mr. Nelsen joined Best Buy in 2006 as Vice President, Operations and International General Counsel. Prior to joining us, he worked at Danka Business Systems PLC, an office products supplier, from 1997 to 2006 and served in various roles, including chief administration officer and general counsel. Prior to his time at Danka, Mr. Nelsen held the role of vice president, legal from 1995 to 1997 at NordicTrack, Inc., a provider of leisure equipment products. Mr. Nelsen began his career in 1989 as a practicing attorney with Best and Flanagan, LLP, a law firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Nelsen is a member of the board of directors of NuShoe, Inc., a privately held shoe repair facility in San Diego, California.

Greg Revelle joined us in November 2014 as our Chief Marketing Officer. In this role, Mr. Revelle is responsible for marketing strategy, branding and execution across all consumer touch points both in-store and online. Functional areas include branding, offline and online advertising, customer relationship management, strategy, customer loyalty, enterprise research and analytics and financial services. Prior to joining Best Buy, Mr. Revelle served as Chief Marketing Officer at AutoNation, the largest automotive retailer in the United States from2012 to 2014. While there, he led a major overhaul of AutoNation’s marketing organization and platform, consolidating 15 regional brands into one unified national brand, rebuilding the

20

Table of Contents

company’s online marketing and e-commerce teams, and launching new web and mobile e-commerce platforms. Before that, he was Vice President of worldwide online marketing at Expedia Inc., one of the world’s leading online travel companies from 2009 to 2012, and before that held other marketing roles from 2005 to 2009. He also was an investment banker at Credit Suisse from 2000 to 2003.

Mathew R. Watson has served as Best Buy’s Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since April 2015. Mr. Watson is responsible for our controllership and external reporting functions. Mr. Watson has served in the role of Vice President, Finance - Controller since 2014. Prior to that role, he was Vice President - Finance, Domestic Controller from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Watson was also Senior Director, External Reporting and Corporate Accounting from 2010 to 2013 and Director, External Reporting and Corporate Accounting beginning in 2007. Prior to joining us in 2005, Mr. Watson worked at KPMG, a professional audit, advisory and tax firm, from 1995 to 2005.

21

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information and Dividends

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BBY. In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend with respect to shares of our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter. In addition, our Board approved a special dividend that was declared and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Another special dividend that was announced on February 25, 2016 will be paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Future dividend payments will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by our Board. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange – Composite Index and the dividends declared and paid during the periods indicated.
Sales Price Dividends Declared and PaidSales Price Dividends Declared and Paid
Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2013 (11-month) Fiscal YearFiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal Year
High Low High Low 2014 
2013
(11-month)
High Low High Low 2016 2015
First Quarter(1)
$26.92
 $13.83
 $27.95
 $20.78
 $0.17
 $0.16
$42.00
 $34.13
 $28.20
 $22.30
 $0.74
 $0.17
Second Quarter31.33
 24.98
 23.57
 16.97
 0.17
 0.16
37.18
 31.68
 32.24
 24.57
 0.23
 0.17
Third Quarter43.85
 30.16
 21.60
 14.62
 0.17
 0.17
39.10
 28.32
 35.53
 28.80
 0.23
 0.19
Fourth Quarter44.66
 22.15
 16.41
 11.20
 0.17
 0.17
36.51
 25.31
 40.03
 33.17
 0.23
 0.19
(1)The first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month) included only two months (March 4, 2012 – May 5, 2012) as a result of the change in our fiscal year-end.
 
Holders

As of March 24, 201421, 2016, there were 3,0512,839 holders of record of our common stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

In June 2011, our Board authorized up to $5.0 billion of share repurchases, which became effective on June 21, 2011. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 program. We did not repurchase any shares during fiscal 2014. At the end of fiscal 2014, $4.02015, $4.0 billion under this program was available for share repurchases. During fiscal 2016, we repurchased and retired 32.8 million shares at a cost of $1 billion. At the end of fiscal 2016, approximately $3.0 billion of the $5.0$5.0 billion of share repurchases authorized by our Board in June 2011 was available for future share repurchases.

In January 2016, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement ("ASR") to purchase $150 million to $175 million of our common stock. Under the agreement, we paid $175 million at the beginning of the contract and received an initial delivery of 4.4 million shares on January 25, 2016. The ASR agreement was settled on February 17, 2016 for a final notional amount of $165 million. Accordingly, we received an additional 1.6 million shares and a cash payment from our counterparty of $10 million equal to the difference between the $175 million up-front payment and the final notional amount.


22

Table of Contents

The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that we purchased as part of our publicly announced repurchase program and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been repurchased at the end of the applicable fiscal period, pursuant to our June 2011 $5.0 billion share repurchase program:

Fiscal PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program(1)
Nov. 1, 2015 through Nov. 28, 2015       
     Open market2,377,063
 $31.67
 2,377,063
 $3,525,000,000
Nov. 29, 2015 through Jan. 2, 2016       
     Open market4,677,222
 $30.42
 4,677,222
 $3,383,000,000
Jan. 3, 2016 through Jan. 30, 2016       
     Open market9,963,036
 $27.54
 9,963,036
 $3,109,000,000
     January 2016 ASR4,398,827
 $27.28
 4,398,827
 $2,989,000,000
Total Fiscal 2016 Fourth Quarter21,416,148
 $28.58
 21,416,148
 $2,989,000,000
(1)
We have a $5.0 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by our board in June 2011. At the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, there was $3.6 billion available for share repurchases. The "Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program" reflects the $612 million we purchased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 pursuant to such program. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 share repurchase program. For additional information, see Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016.:
Plan Category 
Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights
(a)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share of Outstanding Options and Rights(1)
(b)
 
Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(2)
(c)
 
Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights(1) (a)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share of Outstanding Options and Rights(2)
(b)
 
Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(3)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 23,738,232
(3) 
$36.38
 23,974,493
 15,703,886 $36.51
 23,933,241
(1)Includes grants of stock options and market-based restricted stock under our 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended, and our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(2)Includes weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.
(2)(3)
Includes 4,907,1024,343,227 shares of our common stock which have been reserved for issuance under our 2008 and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plans.
(3)Includes grants of stock options and market-based and performance-based restricted stock under our 1994 Full-Time Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended; our 1997 Directors' Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended; our 1997 Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended; and our 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended.


2123

Table of Contents

Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph

The information contained in this Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ("S&P 500"), of which we are a component, and the Standard & Poor's Retailing Group Industry Index ("S&P Retailing Group"), of which we are also a component. The S&P Retailing Group is a capitalization-weighted index of domestic equities traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ and includes high-capitalization stocks representing the retail sector of the S&P 500.

The graph assumes an investment of $100 at the close of trading on February 27, 2009,25, 2011, the last trading day of fiscal 2009,2011, in our common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P Retailing Group.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Best Buy Co., Inc., the S&P 500 and the S&P Retailing Group
 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Best Buy Co., Inc. $100.00
 $128.61
 $115.82
 $89.04
 $61.33
 $91.65
$100.00
 $76.88
 $52.95
 $79.14
 $121.15
 $99.87
S&P 500 100.00
 153.62
 188.29
 197.94
 221.57
 269.25
100.00
 105.12
 117.67
 142.99
 163.33
 162.25
S&P Retailing Group 100.00
 169.06
 213.78
 252.65
 312.74
 394.59
100.00
 118.24
 146.26
 185.65
 222.83
 261.07
*Cumulative total return assumes dividend reinvestment.
Source: Research Data Group, Inc.

2224

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents our selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Five-Year Financial Highlights

$ in millions, except per share amounts
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
Fiscal Year 
2014(1)
 
2013(2)(3)
 
2012(2)(4)
 
2011(5)
 
2010(6)
 
2016(1)
 
2015(2)
 
2014(4)
 
2013(5)(6)
 
2012(5)(7)
Consolidated Statements of Earnings Data                    
Revenue $42,410
 $39,827
 $45,457
 $44,432
 $43,799
 $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
 $38,252
 $43,426
Operating income (loss) 1,140
 (119) 2,200
 2,280
 2,274
Operating income 1,375
 1,450
 1,144
 90
 2,126
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations 689
 (467) 1,424
 1,465
 1,409
 807
 1,246
 695
 (259) 1,368
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations (166) 47
 (1,402) (99) (15) 90
 (11) (172) (161) (1,346)
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 523
 (420) 22
 1,366
 1,394
 897
 1,235
 523
 (420) 22
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders 532
 (441) (1,231) 1,277
 1,317
 897
 1,233
 532
 (441) (1,231)
Per Share Data                    
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations $1.98
 $(1.38) $3.81
 $3.53
 $3.31
 $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
 $(0.76) $3.67
Net gain (loss) from discontinued operations (0.45) 0.08
 (7.08) (0.45) (0.21) 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47) (0.54) (6.94)
Net earnings (loss) 1.53
 (1.30) (3.27) 3.08
 3.10
 2.56
 3.49
 1.53
 (1.30) (3.27)
Cash dividends declared and paid 0.68
 0.66
 0.62
 0.58
 0.56
 1.43
 0.72
 0.68
 0.66
 0.62
Common stock price:                    
High 44.66
 27.95
 33.22
 48.83
 45.55
 42.00
 40.03
 44.66
 27.95
 33.22
Low 13.83
 11.20
 21.79
 30.90
 23.97
 25.31
 22.30
 13.83
 11.20
 21.79
Operating Statistics                    
Comparable store sales gain (decline)(7)
 (0.8)% (3.4)% (1.5)% (2.3)% 0.6%
Comparable sales gain (decline)(8)
 0.5% 0.5% (1.0)% (2.7)% (2.2)%
Gross profit rate 22.8 % 23.3 % 24.2 % 24.6 % 23.7% 23.3% 22.4% 23.1 % 23.6 % 24.5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses rate 19.8 % 20.5 % 19.3 % 19.2 % 18.4% 19.3% 18.8% 20.0 % 20.7 % 19.5 %
Operating income (loss) rate 2.7 % (0.3)% 4.8 % 5.1 % 5.2%
Operating income rate 3.5% 3.6% 2.8 % 0.2 % 4.9 %
Year-End Data                    
Current ratio(8)(9)
 1.4
 1.1
 1.2
 1.2
 1.2
 1.4
 1.5
 1.4
 1.1
 1.1
Total assets(3) $14,013
 $16,787
 $16,005
 $17,849
 $18,302
 $13,519
 $15,245
 $13,990
 $16,774
 $15,994
Debt, including current portion(3) 1,657
 2,296
 2,208
 1,709
 1,802
 1,734
 1,613
 1,647
 2,290
 2,201
Total equity 3,989
 3,715
 4,366
 7,292
 6,964
 4,378
 5,000
 3,989
 3,715
 4,366
Number of stores                    
Domestic 1,495
 1,503
 1,447
 1,317
 1,190
 1,415
 1,448
 1,495
 1,503
 1,447
International 473
 487
 468
 399
 375
 216
 283
 284
 276
 264
Total 1,968
 1,990
 1,915
 1,716
 1,565
 1,631
 1,731
 1,779
 1,779
 1,711
Retail square footage (000s)                    
Domestic 42,051
 42,232
 43,785
 43,660
 42,480
 41,216
 41,716
 42,051
 42,232
 43,785
International 12,872
 13,553
 14,353
 12,385
 11,857
 4,543
 6,470
 6,636
 6,613
 6,814
Total 54,923
 55,785
 58,138
 56,045
 54,337
 45,759
 48,186
 48,687
 48,845
 50,599
(1)
Included within operating income and net earning (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2016 is $201 million ($159 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2016 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2016 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from continuing operations.

25

Table of Contents

(2)Included within net earnings (loss) from continuing operations and net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2015 includes $353 million due to a discrete benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities.
(3)
For fiscal 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 total assets and debt, including current portion are recast to present our retrospective adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-17 Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, ASU 2015-03 Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and ASU 2015-15 Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities. The current ratio for the related fiscal years was also recast to account for the change in balance sheet classification related to the adoption of these ASUs.
(4)Included within operating income and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 is $159$149 million ($10495 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2014 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2014 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from continuing operations.

23

Table of Contents

(2)(5)Fiscal 2013 (11-month) included 48 weeks and fiscal 2012 included 53 weeks. All other periods presented included 52 weeks.
(3)(6)Included within our operating income (loss) and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 (11-month) is $415 million ($268 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2013 (11-month) related to measures we took to restructure our business. Also included in net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 (11-month) is $821$614 million (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges primarily related to Best Buy Canada and Five Star.Canada. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $23 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges primarily related to Best Buy Europe.Europe and $207 million (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges related to Five Star. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2013 (11-month) includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from continuing operations and the net of tax goodwill impairment.
(4)(7)Included within our operating income (loss) and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2012 is $48 million ($30 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2012 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $194 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2012 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Also included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations for fiscal 2012 is $1.2 billion (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges related to Best Buy Europe. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2012 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from both continuing and discontinued operations and the net of tax goodwill impairment, and excludes $1.3 billion in noncontrolling interest related to the agreement to buy out Carphone Warehouse Group plc's interest in the profit share-based management fee paid to Best Buy Europe pursuant to the 2007 Best Buy Mobile agreement (which represents earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest).
(5)(8)Included within our operating income (loss) and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2011 is $147 million ($93 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges recorded in the fiscal fourth quarter related to measures we took to restructure our businesses. These charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate of 0.3% of revenue for the fiscal year. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $54 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges recorded in the fiscal fourth quarter related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2011 includes the net of tax impact of restructuring charges from both continuing and discontinued operations.
(6)Included within our operating income (loss) and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2010 is $26 million ($16 million net of tax) of restructuring charges related to measures we took to restructure our business. These charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate of 0.1% of revenue for the fiscal year. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $18 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2010 includes $25 million net of taxes and noncontrolling interest of restructuring charges from both continuing and discontinued operations.
(7)Comparable storeOur comparable sales is a commonly used metric in the retail industry, whichcalculation compares revenue for a particular period with the corresponding period in the prior year, excluding the impact of sales from new stores opened or closed stores. Our comparable store sales is comprised of revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to website and online sales, call centers and ourcertain other comparable sales channels. Revenue we earn from sales of merchandisechannels for a particular period to wholesalers or dealers is generally not included within our comparable store sales calculation.the corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded, and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from the comparable store sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquired storesAcquisitions are included in the comparable store sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portion of the calculation of comparable storesales attributable to our International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The calculation of comparable sales excludes the impact of the extra week of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, as well as revenue from discontinued operations. The portion ofComparable online sales are included in our calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to our International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.calculation. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.
(8)(9)The current ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Unless otherwise noted, transactions and other factors significantly impacting our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity are discussed in order of magnitude. Our MD&A is presented in sixthe following sections:

Overview
Business Strategy
Fiscal 2017 Trends
Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Critical Accounting Estimates
New Accounting Pronouncements

Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a multi-national, multi-channel retailerleading provider of technology products, including tabletsservices and computers, televisions, mobile phones, largesolutions. We offer these products and small appliances, entertainment products, digital imaging, and related accessories. We also offer consumers technology services – including technical support, repair, troubleshooting and installation – underto the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad brand.agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. We operate two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is

26

Table of Contents

comprised of all operations within the U.S. and its districts and territories. The International segment is comprised of all operations outside the U.S. and its territories.

24

Table of Contents

Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. Historically, we have realized more of our revenue and earnings in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. While consumers view some of the products and services we offer as essential, others are viewed as discretionary purchases. Consequently, our financial results are susceptible to changes in consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors, including unemployment, consumer credit availability and the condition of the housing market. Additionally, there are other factors that directly impact our performance, such as product life-cycles (including the introduction and pace of adoption of new technology) and the competitive retail environment. As a result of these factors, predicting our future revenue and net earnings is difficult. However, we remain confident in our unique customer promise: (1) the latest devices and services, all in one place; (2) impartial and knowledgeable advice; (3) competitive prices; (4) the ability to shop when and where you want; and (5) support for the life of your products.

Throughout this MD&A, we refer to comparable store sales. Comparable storeOur comparable sales is a commonly used metric in the retail industry, whichcalculation compares revenue for a particular period with the corresponding period in the prior year, excluding the impact of sales from new stores opened or closed stores. Our comparable store sales is comprised of revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to website and online sales, call centers and ourcertain other comparable sales channels. Revenue we earn from sales of merchandisechannels for a particular period to wholesalers or dealers is generally not included within our comparable store sales calculation.the corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from the comparable store sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquired storesAcquisitions are included in the comparable store sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The calculation of comparable store sales excludes the impact of the extra week of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, as well as revenue from discontinued operations. The portion of our calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to our International segment excludesoperations and the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. rates (applicable to our International segment only). The Canadian brand consolidation, which includes the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the Future Shop website, has a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, all Canadian store and website revenue has been removed from the comparable sales base and the International segment no longer has a comparable metric in fiscal 2016 and the Enterprise comparable sales equals the Domestic segment comparable sales. Enterprise comparable sales for periods presented prior to fiscal 2016 include revenue from our International segment.

The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.

In our discussions of the operating results of our consolidated business and our International segment, we sometimes refer to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates or the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which are references to the differences between the foreign currency exchange rates we use to convert the International segment’s operating results from local currencies into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is typically calculated as the difference between current period activity translated using the current period’s currency exchange rates and the comparable prior-year period’s currency exchange rates. We use this method to calculate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates for all countries where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

In our discussions of the operating results below, we sometimes refer to the impact of net new stores on our results of operations. The key factors that dictate the impact that the net new stores have on our operating results include: (i) store opening and closing decisions; (ii) the size and format of new stores, as we operate stores ranging from approximately 1,000 square feet to approximately 50,000 square feet; (iii) the length of time the stores were open during the period; and (iv) the overall success of new store launches.

When assessing our performance in consumer electronics categories against other retailers, we often reference The NPD Group's ("NPD") Weekly Tracking Service for the appropriate period. NPD defines the consumer electronics industry as including televisions, desktop and notebook computers, tablets not including Kindle, digital imaging and other categories. Sales of these products represent approximately 65% of our Domestic segment revenue in fiscal 2016. The data does not include mobile phones, appliances, services, gaming, Apple watch, movies or music.

This MD&A includes financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), as well as certain adjusted or non-GAAP financial measures such as adjustednon-GAAP operating income, adjustednon-GAAP effective tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations, adjustednon-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations and adjusted debt to earnings before goodwill impairment, interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent ("EBITDAR") ratio. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP measures as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

We believe that the non-GAAP measures described above provide meaningful supplemental information to assist shareholders in understanding our financial results and assessing our prospects for future performance. Management believes adjusted operating income, adjusted effective tax rate, adjusted net earnings from continuing operations and adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations are important indicators of our operations because they exclude items that may not be indicative of, or are unrelated to, our core operating results and provide a baseline for analyzing trends in our underlying businesses. Management makes standard adjustments for items such as restructuring charges, goodwill impairments, non-restructuring asset impairments and gains or losses on sales of investments, as well as adjustments for other items that may arise during the period and have a meaningful impact on comparability. To measure adjusted operating income, we removedRefer to the impactNon-GAAP Financial Measures section below for the detailed reconciliation of restructuring charges, non-restructuring asset impairments, goodwill impairments anditems that impacted the impact of second quarter fiscal 2014 LCD-related legal settlements fromnon-GAAP measures in the presented periods. Management believes our calculation of operating income. Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations was calculated by

2527

Table of Contents

removing the after-tax impact of operating income adjustments and the gain on sale of investments, as well as the tax impact of the Best Buy Europe sale from our calculation of net earnings from continuing operations. To measure adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations, we excluded the per share impact of net earnings adjustments from our calculation of diluted earnings per share. Management believes our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is an important indicator of our creditworthiness. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. These non-GAAP financial measures are an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures within our discussion of consolidated performance below, provide a more complete understanding of our business. We strongly encourage investors and shareholders to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.

Business Strategy

InOn a full year basis, fiscal 2016 marked the fall of 2012, we laid out for investors the state of our business and summarized the challenges we faced by articulating two fundamental problems: (1) declining comparable store sales and (2) shrinking margins. To address these problems and achieve our goal of becoming the leading authority and destination for technology products and services, we revealed our Renew Blue transformation effort. That effort has five pillars and they are:

Reinvigorate and rejuvenate the customer experience
Attract and inspire leaders and employees
Work with vendor partners to innovate and drive value
Increase our return on invested capital
Continue our leadership role in positively impacting our world

This past year was the first full fiscalsecond year in our Renew Blue transformation. While we remain in the early stages of our journey, we are pleased to report significant progress. Most notably, we stabilized our revenue and achieved virtually flat Domestic segment comparable store sales,a row we increased our Domestic segment revenue and expanded our operating margin. We also continued to make significant progress against our Renew Blue strategy. During the year, we continued to gain share in appliances and nearly all of our traditional consumer electronics categories. We grew the Domestic segment online revenue by nearly 20 percent, we13% to over $4 billion, or 11% of total Domestic segment revenue in fiscal 2016. We increased our Net Promoter Score ("NPS") by over 300 basis pointspoints. We continued to improve our employee engagement scores and decreased employee turnover. We deepened our partnerships with the top tech companies in the world. We delivered $150 million against our $400 million Renew Blue Phase 2 cost reduction and gross profit optimization program. We consolidated brands and embarked on a significant transformation in Canada, including the closure of 68 stores. And finally, in one year, we exceededreturned $1.5 billion in cash to our multi-year Renew Blue cost reduction target of $725 million.shareholders, including $1 billion in share repurchases, which was originally planned to be completed over three years.

Beyond these successes,Fiscal 2017 Priorities

Turning to fiscal 2017, we made additional operational improvements that included: increased price competitiveness; a ship-from-store ability now in place in more than 1,400 locations;are entering the opening of 1,400 Samsung and 600 Windows stores-within-a-store and the completion of the firstnext phase of our floor space optimization;Renew Blue strategy. Our purpose from a customer standpoint is to build a company that does a unique job of helping customers learn about and enjoy the re-launchlatest technology. As we begin this next phase in fiscal 2017, we will focus on the following priorities: (1) building on our strong industry position and multi-channel capabilities to drive the existing business; (2) driving cost reduction and efficiencies; and (3) advancing key initiatives to drive future growth and differentiation.

Our first priority is to build on our strong industry position and multi-channel capabilities to drive the existing business. More specifically, we plan to implement a number of initiatives across merchandising, marketing, digital, stores, services, and supply chain.

Our second priority for fiscal 2017 is to reduce cost and drive efficiencies throughout the business. Reducing costs is essential for us to be able to fund our investments, build our resilience to product cycles and increase our profitability over time. Furthermore, based on current economic factors and softness in the consumer electronics industry, it is essential that we be proactive on the cost reduction front.

A key element of our loyalty and credit card programs; and the strengthening of our balance sheet through a renewed focus onapproach to achieving this is to simplify our core business processes to simultaneously improve the customer experience and drive costs out. As an example, we have a substantially more disciplined capital allocation process.project focused on reducing the amount of open box appliances we take into our stores by addressing root cause issues. This project has the potential to not only improve the customer experience but also to drive material savings through lower markdowns, lower transportation costs and better use of labor in our stores and distribution centers.

More broadly, we aspire to deliver world-class operational performance, defined in terms of quality, service and cost. This focus has to be a way of life, especially given our margin structure and the volatility of our industry. In fiscal 2016, we announced a specific cost reduction and gross profit optimization program called Renew Blue Road Map for Phase 2, with a goal of $400 million over three years on top of the Next 24 Months$1 billion we eliminated as part of Phase 1 in fiscal 2015.

Looking ahead,Against that goal, in fiscal 2016, we remain focused on stabilizing and improving our comparable store sales and increasing profitability. To aid in this focus, we have created a road map for the next 24 monthsachieved $150 million of annualized savings leaving us with $250 million remaining. In light of our transformation. This road mapincreased focus on cost and productivity, we believe there are incremental savings that can be achieved above and beyond our current goal. Partially offsetting these savings, however, will be our expected future investments in the areas of labor expertise, services pricing and key growth initiatives. In fiscal 2016, these investments totaled approximately $100 million and we expect a similar level in fiscal 2017, which again will be funded by our cost savings.

Our third priority is groundedto advance key initiatives to more deeply transform our company in our belief that we needorder to do three things over the upcoming fiscal year and next. We must improve operational performance, build foundational capabilities necessary to unlockdrive future growth and make full use of our unique assets to create significant differentiation for our customers and vendors. With this mind, our road map is built around eight priorities:

Merchandising. Our goal is to create a compelling assortment online and in the stores with a superior end-to-end customer experience that yields enhanced financial returns. Our priorities in merchandising over the next 24 months include the following: (1) developing compelling and differentiated strategies for key categories that leverage our competitive assets; (2) strengthening vendor partnerships; (3) implementing an enhanced online shopping experience for key categories; (4) expanding Pacific Kitchen and Home and Magnolia Design Centers stores-within-a-store; and (5) optimizing returns, replacement and damages through operational improvements like ship-from-store.

Marketing. Our goal is to unlock growth opportunities by creating and effectively communicating new, compelling value propositions for customers that go beyond price. Our priorities in marketing over the next 24 months include developing more targeted, relevant and personalized customer communications in support of category strategies, as well as creating greater engagement with customers through our loyalty program and our credit card offering.

Online. Our goal is todifferentiation. While there may be short-term pressures, we continue to capture online market sharebelieve we operate in an opportunity rich environment. The Internet of Things is providing a new technology wave and serve customers based on how, where, and when they wantis making our operating model increasingly relevant to be served. Our online priorities over the next 24 months include further improving the online shopping experience to make it easier for customers to find and choose products, encouraging customers to complete their technology solutions by improvingcustomers.

2628

Table of Contents


We are investing to be the presentation of accessoriesleading technology expert who makes it easy to learn about and services and enabling customers to build their own bundle,confidently enjoy the best technology. In this context, we believe we have ongoing growth opportunities around key product categories, as well as leveragingfrom increasing our expanded supply chain capabilities. We will also continueshare of wallet with existing customers and acquiring new customers within our target segment who are passionate about technology and need help with it. Our Services capabilities and Geek Squad are key building blocks of this strategy. While it is not visible in our services top line results today, we are making progress to re-engineer our e-commerce technology platform so that new features and functions can be developed quickly and optimized across platforms.bring these opportunities to life.

Retail Stores. Our abilityOver the last two years, we have improved many aspects of our extended service plan and repair operations. We have also had to transform Best Buy is highly dependent onadjust our abilitypricing of our extended service plans. We are seeing the results of our efforts through substantial increases in NPS, higher total customer interactions and from a financial point of view, the periodic profit sharing payments we earned this year. We are also beginning to transform our in-store experience. To that end,see improving attach rates as we are evolving our field organization based on what we see as the mission of retail, which is (1) the execution of category and functional strategies; (2) the development and implementation of effective market-level strategies that take into account the specifics of local markets; and (3) the ability to lift our performance in terms of employee engagement, customer satisfaction, sales and profitability.enter fiscal 2017.

Supply Chain. We believe that our supply chain is a competitive advantage, driven by a powerful network of strategically located distribution centers and the recently launched ship-from-store capabilities. Our goal over the next 24 months is to useBuilding on this network and improve our customer experience by providing (1) increased inventory availability; (2) improved speed to the customer; and (3) improved home delivery and installation capabilities for our large-cube assortment. To achieve this,foundational work, we will continue our work to investimprove the customer experience and enhance our service offering and capabilities, in systems and infrastructure to drive significantly enhanced delivery options.

Geek Squad Services. We believe the Geek Squad is onesupport of our biggest competitive advantages, yet atmission to help customers learn about and enjoy the same time,latest technology. While we believeare energized by the potential of this opportunity, the work necessary to capture it is an underutilized asset. Our goal for the Geek Squad is to deliver a superior customer experience, while providing a key revenue and profit growth engine for Best Buy. Our goals for Geek Squad over the next 24 months include (1) improving our service delivery and the service experience for our customers; (2) refining existing service offerings (e.g., extended warranty services); and (3) building new offerings that meet the needs of customers in the context of today’s technology environment.

Cost Structure. Our goal is to more quickly and deeply reduce our costs. Through the fourth quarter oftakes time. Thus, fiscal 2014, we eliminated a total of $765 million in annualized costs, which exceeded our original multi-year target of $725 million. We have now increased our target to $1 billion. We expect these additional cost reductions to come primarily from: (1) returns, replacements and damages; (2) logistics and supply chain; (3) procurement; and (4) continued rationalization of our organization.

Employee Engagement. Across the company, we have a commitment to serving our customers in such an extraordinary manner that they become promoters of Best Buy. A key to achieving this goal is the talent and engagement of our people. In line with this, over the next 24 months, we2017 will be pursuing the successful implementationanother year of our new field-gradual and store-operating model, the strengthening of our talent in critical areas, and the redefining of key business processes to better support our multi-channel, customer-focused strategy.

In addition to the areas above, we plan to focus on improving the performance in our International segment. Largely as a result of our Renew Blue initiatives, we reduced International SG&Aincremental improvement, with more meaningful results expected in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2015, we expect to take further actions to reduce our International segment’s cost structure.

Long-Term Financial Targets

All of these initiatives are in pursuit of our long-term non-GAAP targets of a 5% to 6% operating income rate and a 13% to 15% return on invested capital.2018.

Fiscal 20152017 Trends

InWe believe that the U.S.,consumer electronics industry will continue to be characterized by product innovation cycles. We are undeterred by this fact - as we have an agreement with Citibank forbelieve there will always be technology innovation. Our imperative is, that in these cycles, we continue to deliver superior execution against what is in our control, recognizing that the issuance of promotional financing and customer loyalty credit cards bearing the Best Buy brand (the "Citibank credit card agreement"). We commenced operating under the Citibank credit card agreementcycles rarely align at any point in September 2013, at which point Citibank acquired the customer portfolio from the previous bank. The Citibank credit card agreement is expected to result in lower revenue and gross profit rates due to less favorable economics as a result of changes in both the regulatory and overall consumer credit market. Revenues we earn under the Citibank credit card agreement are primarily based on the profitability of the credit card portfolio. These revenues are inherently more difficult to forecast than revenues earned under the previous credit card agreement, which were primarily based on new account activations.time.

In fiscal 2015,2017, we estimateare focused on continuing to build on our foundation to both drive and capitalize on these technology cycles. In parallel, we are focused on building the key initiatives outlined above that we believe will result in stronger relationships with our customers, provide profitable revenue even during down cycles and continue to create long-term shareholder value.

Over time, as the fruit of these key initiatives materialize, we expect to accelerate our revenue and operating income growth by taking advantage of opportunities provided by ongoing technology innovation and the need customers have for help. In the short-term, we expect to be characterized by our strong cash flow generating capabilities and our intent to regularly return excess free cash flow to shareholders.

From a financial outlook perspective, for fiscal 2017, based on current industry dynamics and how we see the various product cycles playing out in our Domestic segment, we are expecting revenue declines in the first half followed by growth in the back half. We also expect that our strong execution and operational capabilities will allow us to continue to gain market share. In this context we are targeting flat Domestic segment revenue for the full fiscal year due to continued growth in appliances, connected home and home theater in particular, but recognize that it will be challenging without a strong mobile cycle and improvements in the NPD-reported categories overall.

Despite the soft revenue environment, we will generate $150 million to $200 million less revenuetarget approximately flat operating income, including the lapping of the significant periodic profit sharing benefits from our credit card agreement thanservices plan portfolio that we earned in fiscal 2014.2016. A portionkey element to achieve this will be the delivery of our cost reduction and gross profit optimization initiatives. In addition, we intend to reward our shareholders by being a premium dividend payer and increasing our EPS through ongoing share repurchases.

After three consecutive years of strong cash flow generation under Renew Blue, we believe now is an ideal time to provide a view of our long-term capital allocation strategy. This strategy is based on our strong cash position today and our ongoing confidence in our future cash-flow generation. At the core of this year-over-year decreasestrategy is driven byour intent to first fund our operations and growth investments, including potential acquisitions, and then to return the accelerated recognition of previously deferred revenue relatedremaining excess free cash flow to our previousshareholders, over time, through dividends and share repurchases, while maintaining investment grade credit card agreementmetrics. This strategy targets the return of excess free cash flow to shareholders through a 35% to 45% non-GAAP dividend payout ratio (defined as dividends divided by non-GAAP net earnings) and regular share repurchases with a minimum annual expectation of offsetting dilution from equity compensation.

In line with this strategy, our fiscal 2017 return of capital plan includes (1) a 22% increase in the regular quarterly dividend to $0.28 per share; (2) the intent to repurchase $1 billion worth of shares over the next two years; and (3) a special dividend of $0.45 per share, or approximately $145 million. This is in addition to the $1.5 billion in cash we returned to shareholders in fiscal 2014.2016.


2729

Table of Contents

In the first three quarters of fiscal 2015, we expect the following business drivers to have a net negative impact on our operating income rate: (1) ongoing price investments; (2) incremental Renew Blue SG&A investments; (3) the increase in our product warranty-related costs due to higher mobile phone claims frequency; (4) the negative impact of our credit card agreement with Citibank, as described above; and (5) the offsetting positive impact of the realization of Renew Blue cost savings. We expect the net negative impact of these factors to be greatest in the first quarter of fiscal 2015, as we expect to realize greater cost savings in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2015.
In addition, we anticipate reorganizing certain European legal entities to simplify our overall structure in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. We currently expect this reorganization to accelerate a non-cash tax benefit of approximately $310 million to $365 million. As a result of this acceleration, we are expecting a lower annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2015.

Results of Operations

In order to align our fiscal reporting periods and comply with statutory filing requirements in certain foreign jurisdictions, we consolidate the financial results of our Europe,Mexico operations, as well as our discontinued China and MexicoEurope operations, on a one-month lag. Consistent with such consolidation, the financial and non-financial information presented in our MD&A relative to these operations is also presented on a lag. Our policy is to accelerate the recording of events occurring in the lag period that significantly affect our consolidated financial statements. There were no significant intervening events which would have materially affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or other factors had they been recorded during fiscal 2014 (12-month).2016.

On November 2, 2011, our Board approved a change in our fiscal year-end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January, effective beginning with our fiscal year 2013. As a result of this change, our fiscal year 2013 transition period was 11 months and ended on February 2, 2013, and we began consolidating the results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a one-month lag, compared to a two-month lag in fiscal year 2012, to continue aligning our fiscal reporting periods with statutory filing requirements in certain foreign jurisdictions. As a result of our change in fiscal year-end and resulting change in our lag period, the month of January 2012 was not captured in our consolidated fiscal 2013 (11-month) results for those entities reported on a one-month lag. Refer to Note 2, Fiscal Year-end Change, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

In this MD&A, when financial results for fiscal 2014 are compared to financial results for fiscal 2013, the results for the 12-month fiscal 2014 are compared to the results for the 11-month transition period from fiscal 2013. When financial results for fiscal 2013 are compared to financial results for fiscal 2012, the results for the 11-month transition period are compared to the results of the comparable 11-month recast period from fiscal 2012. Fiscal 2014 (12-month) included 52 weeks, and fiscal 2013 (11-month) and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) included 48 weeks. The following tables show the fiscal months included within the various comparison periods in our MD&A:
Fiscal 2014 (12-month) Results Compared With Fiscal 2013 (11-month)(1)
2014 (12-month)2013 (11-month)
February 2013 - January 2014March 2012 - January 2013
(1)
For entities reported on a lag, the fiscal months included in fiscal 2014 (12-month) were January through December and for fiscal 2013 (11-month) were February through December.
Fiscal 2013 (11-month) Results Compared With Fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)(1)
2013 (11-month)2012 (11-month recast)
March 2012 - January 2013March 2011 - January 2012
(1)
For entities reported on a lag, the fiscal months included in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) were February through December.

The month of February 2012, which was the last month of fiscal 2012 (12-month), is excluded from the comparison periods shown above. As such, there is no discussion of February 2012 throughout the remainder of this MD&A. Other than an extra week of activity in February 2012, which generated additional revenue, gross profit and operating income, we do not believe there were any unusual events or transactions or any significant economic changes or trends that materially affected the month of February 2012.


28

Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations Presentation

The results of mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. ("mindSHIFT") in our large-format Best Buy branded stores in ChinaDomestic segment and Turkey, Best Buy Europe Napster and mindSHIFTFive Star in our International segment are presented as discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Unless otherwise stated, financial results discussed herein refer to continuing operations.

Fiscal Domestic Segment Installment Billing Plans

In April 2014, Summary we began to sell installment billing plans offered by mobile carriers to our customers to complement the more traditional two-year plans. While the two types of contracts have broadly similar overall economics, installment billing plans typically generate higher revenues due to higher proceeds for devices and higher cost of sales due to lower device subsidies. As we increase our mix of installment billing plans, there is an associated increase in revenue and cost of goods sold and a decrease in gross profit rate, with gross profit dollars relatively unaffected. This change in plan offer does not impact our International segment.

The following table presents our Domestic and Enterprise comparable sales and the estimated benefit of installment billing for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
 
January 30, 2016(1)
 January 31, 2015
Domestic   
Comparable sales % gain0.5 % 1.0%
Estimated benefit of installment billing0.6 % 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding estimated impact of installment billing(0.1)% 0.5%
    
Enterprise   
Comparable sales % gain0.5 % 0.5%
Estimated benefit of installment billing0.6 % 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding estimated impact of installment billing(0.1)% %

(1)The Canadian brand consolidation, which included the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the Future Shop website, has a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, all Canadian store and website revenue has been removed from the comparable sales base and the International segment no longer has a comparable metric in fiscal 2016 and the Enterprise comparable sales equals the Domestic segment comparable sales. Enterprise comparable sales for periods presented prior to fiscal 2016 include revenue from our International segment.

Consolidated Results

Fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 Summary

Fiscal 2016 included net earnings from continuing operations of $689 million,$0.8 billion, compared to a net loss of $467 million$1.2 billion in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015. Net earnings in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 included $159$201 million of restructuring charges, while fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 included $822a $353 million of goodwill impairments and $414 million of restructuring charges.discrete tax benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities. Earnings per diluted share from continuing operations was $1.98$2.30 in fiscal 2014 (12-month),2016, compared to loss per diluted share of $1.38$3.53 in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015.
Revenue was $42.4$39.5 billion in fiscal 2014 (12-month).2016 a decrease of $811 million compared to fiscal 2015. The increase from fiscal 2013 (11-month)decrease was driven by an extra monththe International segment and related to the negative impact of revenue, partially offset byforeign currency exchange fluctuations and the negative impact of Canadian store closures in the Domestic and International segments and a comparable store sales declineclosures.

30

Table of 0.8%.Contents

Our gross profit rate decreasedincreased by 0.5%0.9% of revenue to 22.8%23.3% of revenue.revenue in fiscal 2016. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to an investment in price competitiveness in the Domestic segmenta periodic profit sharing benefit based on performance of our externally-managed extended service plan portfolio and a more promotional environment in the Domesticcathode ray tube and International segments.
We recorded $159 million of restructuring chargesliquid crystal display ("CRT/LCD") related to several restructuring actions we undertook in fiscal 2014 (12-month), including our Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and other operational changes.legal settlements received.
We generated $1.1$1.3 billion in operating cash flow in fiscal 2014 (12-month),2016, compared to $1.5$1.9 billion in fiscal 2013 (11-month),2015, and we ended fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 with $2.7$3.3 billion of cash, and cash equivalents and short-term investments, compared to $1.8$3.9 billion at the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month). Capital expenditures decreased $158 million to $547 million compared to the prior year as a result of a more disciplined capital allocation process.2015.
During fiscal 2014 (12-month),2016, we made four dividend payments totaling $0.68$1.43 per share, or $233$499 million in the aggregate.

Consolidated Results

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for each of the past three fiscal years and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) ($ in millions, except per share amounts):
  12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
Consolidated Performance Summary 2014 2013 2012 2012
      (recast)  
Revenue $42,410
 $39,827
 $41,311
 $45,457
Revenue gain (decline) % 6.5 % (3.6)% n/a
 2.3 %
Comparable store sales % decline (0.8)% (3.4)% (1.6)% (1.5)%
Gross profit $9,690
 $9,298
 $9,908
 $10,984
Gross profit as a % of revenue(1)
 22.8 % 23.3 % 24.0 % 24.2 %
SG&A $8,391
 $8,181
 $7,986
 $8,755
SG&A as a % of revenue(1)
 19.8 % 20.5 % 19.3 % 19.3 %
Restructuring charges $159
 $414
 $24
 $29
Goodwill impairments $
 $822
 $
 $
Operating income (loss) $1,140
 $(119) $1,898
 $2,200
Operating income (loss) as a % of revenue 2.7 % (0.3)% 4.6 % 4.8 %
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations(2)
 $687
 $(469) $1,214
 $1,421
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations(3)
 $(155) $28
 $(2,639) $(2,652)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $532
 $(441) $(1,425) $(1,231)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations $1.98
 $(1.38) $3.19
 $3.81
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $1.53
 $(1.30) $(3.72) $(3.27)
Consolidated Performance Summary 2016 2015 2014
Revenue $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Revenue % gain (decline) (2.0)% (0.7)% 6.2 %
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
 0.5 % 0.5 % (1.0)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
 (0.1)%  % (1.0)%
Restructuring charges - cost of goods sold $3
 $
 $
Gross profit $9,191
 $9,047
 $9,399
Gross profit as a % of revenue(3)
 23.3 % 22.4 % 23.1 %
SG&A $7,618
 $7,592
 $8,106
SG&A as a % of revenue 19.3 % 18.8 % 20.0 %
Restructuring charges $198
 $5
 $149
Operating income $1,375
 $1,450
 $1,144
Operating income as a % of revenue 3.5 % 3.6 % 2.8 %
Net earnings from continuing operations $807
 $1,246
 $695
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations(4)
 $90
 $(13) $(163)
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $897
 $1,233
 $532
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
Diluted earnings per share $2.56
 $3.49
 $1.53
(1)Enterprise comparable sales for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 includes revenue from continuing operations in the the International segment. Excluding the International segment, Enterprise comparable sales for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, excluding the impact of installment billing, would have been 0.5% and (0.4%), respectively, or equal to Domestic comparable sales excluding the impact of installment billing, for the same period.
(2)Represents comparable sales excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing.
(3)
Because retailers vary in how they record costs of operating their supply chain between cost of goods sold and SG&A, our gross profit rate and SG&A rate may not be comparable to other retailers' corresponding rates. For additional information regarding costs classified in cost of goods sold and SG&A,

29

Table of Contents

refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2)Includes both net earnings (loss) from continuing operations and net earnings from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.
(3)(4)Includes both gain (loss) from discontinued operations and net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Fiscal 20142016 (12-month) Results Compared With Fiscal 20132015 (11-month)

For purposes of this section, fiscal 2014 (12-month) represents the 12-month period ended February 1, 2014 and fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 2013.

The components of the 6.5%2.0% revenue increasedecrease in fiscal 20142016 (12-month) were as follows:
Extra month of revenue(1)
8.0 %
Net store changes(0.6)%
Comparable store sales impact(0.5)%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(1.3)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
(1.1)%
Comparable sales impact0.4)%
Total revenue increasedecrease6.5(2.0)%
(1)
RepresentsNon-comparable sales reflects the incrementalimpact of net store opening and closing activity, including the Canadian brand consolidation activity, as well as, the impact of revenue in fiscal 2014, which had 12 monthsstreams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit sharing benefits, certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of activity comparedmerchandise to 11 months in fiscal 2013wholesalers and dealers, as a result of our fiscal year-end change. Refer to Note 2, Fiscal Year-end Change, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
applicable.


31

Table of Contents

Our gross profit rate decreased 0.5%increased 0.9% of revenue in fiscal 2014 (12-month).2016. Our Domestic and International segmentssegment contributed a rate decreaseincrease of 0.3%0.9% of revenue and 0.2% of revenue, respectively.there was no change in our International segment. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

The SG&A rate decreased 0.7%increased 0.5% of revenue in fiscal 20142016 (12-month). Our Domestic and International segmentssegment contributed a rate decreaseincrease of 0.6%0.5% of revenue and 0.1% of revenue, respectively.there was no change in our International segment. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

We recordedSG&A restructuring charges of $159increased from $5 million in fiscal 2014 (12-month), comprised of $1232015 to $198 million in our Domesticfiscal 2016. Our International segment and $36 million in our International segment. These restructuring charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income in fiscal 2014 (12-month) of 0.4% of revenue. We recorded $415 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month), which included $1 million of inventory write-downs recorded in cost of goods sold. Our Domestic and International segments recorded $328 million and $87 million of restructuring charges, respectively, in fiscal 2013 (11-month). The restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2013 (11-month) resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate of 1.0% of revenue.drove this increase. For further discussion of each segment’ssegment's SG&A restructuring charges, see Segment Performance Summary,, below.

Our operating income increased $1.3 billiondecreased $75 million, and our operating income as a percent of revenue increaseddecreased to 3.5% of revenue in fiscal 2016, compared to operating income of 2.7%3.6% of revenue in fiscal 2014 (12-month), compared to an operating loss of 0.3% of revenue in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015. The increasedecrease in our operating income was primarily due to a decreasean increase in goodwill impairments and restructuring charges as well as additional operating income from an extra month of activitypartially offset by net CRT/LCD legal settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2014 (12-month) compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month).2016.

Fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)2014

For purposes of this section, fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 2013 and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) represents the comparable 11-month period ended January 28, 2012.

In fiscal 2013 (11-month), we experienced comparable store sales declines in gaming, computers, televisions and digital imaging. These declines were partially offset by gains in mobile phones and tablets. The decline in gross profit rate reflects mix shifts and a price competitive environment. The increase in SG&A largely reflected increased field incentive compensation and executive retention and transition costs.


30

Table of Contents

The components of the 3.6%0.7% revenue decrease in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 were as follows:
Comparable store sales impactImpact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(3.30.7)%
Net store changes(0.30.2)%
Non-comparable sales channels(1)
(0.10.2)%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuationsComparable sales impact0.10.4 %
Total revenue decrease(3.60.7)%
(1)
Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable store sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

Our gross profit rate decreased 0.7% of revenue in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015. Our Domestic and International segments contributed a rate decrease of 0.6% of revenue and 0.1% of revenue, respectively. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

The SG&A rate increaseddecreased 1.2% of revenue in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015. Our Domestic and International segments contributed a rate increasedecrease of 0.8%1.1% of revenue and 0.4%0.1% of revenue, respectively. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

We recorded restructuring charges of $415$149 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month), which included $12014, comprised of $123 million of inventory write-downs recorded in cost of goods sold. Ourour Domestic segment recorded $328and $26 million of restructuring charges, including $1 million of inventory write-downs, in fiscal 2013 (11-month), and our International segment recorded $87 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month).segment. These restructuring charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2014 of 1.0%0.4% of revenue. We recorded $43 millionan immaterial amount of restructuring charges in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast), which included $19 million of inventory write-downs recorded in cost of goods sold. Our Domestic and International segments recorded $38 million and $5 million of restructuring charges, respectively, in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). The restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate of 0.1% of revenue.2015. For further discussion of each segment’s restructuring charges, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

Our operating income decreased $2.0 billion, or 106.3%,increased $306 million, and our operating lossincome as a percent of revenue decreasedincreased to 0.3%3.6% of revenue in fiscal 2013 (11-month),2015, compared to operating income of 4.6%2.8% of revenue in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast).2014. The decreaseincrease in our operating income was due to an increase in goodwill impairments, a decrease in gross profit as a result of a decrease in revenueSG&A and a decline in the gross profit rate, an increase in restructuring charges, and an increasepartially offset by LCD legal settlement proceeds received in SG&A.fiscal 2014.


32

Table of Contents

Segment Performance Summary
 
Domestic Segment

The following table presents selected financial data for our Domestic segment for each of the past three fiscal years and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) ($ in millions):
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
Domestic Segment Performance Summary 2014 2013 2012 20122016 2015 2014
Revenue$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
Revenue gain %0.9 % 0.6% 7.9 %
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
0.5 % 1.0% (0.4)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding the estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
(0.1)% 0.5% (0.4)%
Gross profit$8,484
 $8,080
 $8,274
Gross profit as % of revenue23.3 % 22.4% 23.1 %
SG&A$6,897
 $6,639
 $7,006
SG&A as % of revenue19.0 % 18.4% 19.6 %
Restructuring charges$2
 $4
 $123
Operating income$1,585
 $1,437
 $1,145
Operating income as % of revenue4.4 % 4.0% 3.2 %
     (recast)       
Revenue $35,831
 $33,222
 $34,102
 $37,596
Revenue gain (decline) % 7.9 % (2.6)% n/a
 1.4 %
Comparable store sales decline % (0.4)% (1.7)% (1.6)% (1.6)%
Gross profit $8,274
 $7,789
 $8,227
 $9,179
Gross profit as a % of revenue 23.1 % 23.4 % 24.1 % 24.4 %
SG&A $7,006
 $6,728
 $6,554
 $7,191
SG&A as a % of revenue 19.6 % 20.3 % 19.2 % 19.1 %
Restructuring charges $123
 $327
 $19
 $24
Goodwill impairments $
 $3
 $
 $
Operating income $1,145
 $731
 $1,654
 $1,964
Operating income as a % of revenue 3.2 % 2.2 % 4.9 % 5.2 %
Selected Online Revenue Data:     
Online revenue as a % of total segment revenue
11.0 % 9.8% 8.5 %
Comparable online sales % gain(1)
13.5 % 16.7% 19.8 %
(1)Comparable online sales gain is included in the total comparable sales gain (decline) above.
(2)Represents comparable sales excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing.


31

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our Domestic segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years:
Fiscal 2012 Fiscal 2013 (11-Month) Fiscal 2014Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

 
Stores
Opened

 
Stores
Closed

 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

 
Stores
Opened

 
Stores
Closed

 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

Best Buy1,103
 
 (47) 1,056
 
 (1) 1,055
1,055
 
 (5) 1,050
 
 (13) 1,037
Best Buy Mobile stand-alone305
 105
 (1) 409
 12
 (15) 406
406
 1
 (40) 367
 
 (17) 350
Pacific Sales34
 
 
 34
 
 (4) 30
30
 
 (1) 29
 
 (1) 28
Magnolia Audio Video5
 
 (1) 4
 
 
 4
4
 
 (2) 2
 
 (2) 
Total Domestic segment stores1,447
 105
 (49) 1,503
 12
 (20) 1,495
1,495
 1
 (48) 1,448
 
 (33) 1,415

We continuously monitor store performance. As we approach the expiration date of our stores leases, we evaluate various options for each location, including whether a store should remain open.

Fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 Results Compared With Fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015

For purposesWe offer extended protection plans that are managed by third party insurers. We may also be eligible to receive profit-sharing payments, depending on the performance of the portfolio. When performance of the portfolio is strong and the cost to the third party insurer declines, we are entitled to share in the excess profits. In fiscal 2016, we recognized $148 million of such profit-share revenue, with an equal impact to gross profit and operating income. We exclude such profit-share revenue from comparable sales calculations. The amount recognized in fiscal 2016 was substantially higher than for prior periods. The unusually strong performance of the portfolio for fiscal 2016, which particularly related to mobile phones, was due to changes to the design of our extended service plans, improvements to our repair and fulfillment operations and industry trends. These trends have also led to lower revenues from repairs we undertake on behalf of the insurers, as discussed further below. The premiums we pay to insurers are periodically adjusted to reflect such trends and consequently we do not expect profit share payments to continue at this section,level in future periods.

33

Table of Contents


Domestic segment revenue of $36.4 billion in fiscal 2014 (12-month) represents2016 increased 0.9% compared to the 12-month period ended February 1, 2014prior year. This increase was primarily driven by a comparable sales growth of 0.5%, which included an estimated 0.6% of revenue benefit associated with installment billing and fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 2013.a periodic profit sharing benefit based on performance of our externally managed extended service plan portfolio.

During fiscal 2014 (12-month), we made substantial progress against our Renew Blue priorities. First, we exceeded our original Renew Blue annualized cost reduction targets. Second, we made progress stabilizing our comparable store sales and operating income rate. In our Domestic segment online revenue of $4.0 billion increased 13.5% on a comparable stores sales were nearly flat for fiscal 2014 (12-month). Domestic operating income increased in fiscal 2014 (12-month); however, this was driven by LCD-related legal settlements and lower restructuring charges. Excluding these items, our operating income rate decreasedbasis primarily due to higher conversion rates and increased traffic. As a lower gross profit rate, which was only partially offset by cost reduction initiatives and tighter expense management.percentage of total Domestic revenue, online revenue increased 120 basis points to 11.0% versus 9.8% last year.

The components of the 7.9%0.9% revenue increase in the Domestic segment in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 were as follows:
Comparable sales impact0.5%
Extra month of revenueNon-comparable sales(1)
8.20.4 %
Net store changes(0.2)%
Comparable store sales impact(0.1)%
Total revenue increase7.90.9%
(1)
RepresentsNon-comparable sales reflects the incrementalimpact of net store opening and closing activity, as well as the impact of revenue in fiscal 2014, which had 12 monthsstreams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit sharing benefits, credit card revenue, gift card breakage, commercial sales and sales of activity comparedmerchandise to 11 months in fiscal 2013 as a result of our fiscal year-end change. Refer to Note 2, Fiscal Year-end Change, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statementswholesalers and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
dealers.

The decrease in revenue from net store changes was primarily due to the closure of 47 large-format Best Buy branded stores in the second and third quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month). The opening and closing of small-format Best Buy Mobile stores had a significantly smaller impact given their smaller size and limited category focus compared to our large-format stores.

The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 and 2013 (11-month):2015:
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales SummaryRevenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
12 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended 11 Months EndedYear Ended Year Ended
February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Consumer Electronics(1)
30% 32% (5.6)% (8.0)%32% 31% 4.7 % 3.7 %
Computing and Mobile Phones(1)
48% 45% 4.7 % 7.4 %46% 47% (2.6)% (0.6)%
Entertainment8% 10% (16.3)% (21.4)%8% 9% (3.6)% 4.5 %
Appliances7% 6% 16.7 % 10.1 %8% 7% 15.4 % 7.5 %
Services6% 6% 0.2 % 0.8 %5% 5% (11.6)% (11.1)%
Other1% 1% n/a
 n/a
1% 1% n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% (0.4)% (1.7)%100% 100% 0.5 % 1.0 %
(1)
In fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the "Consumer Electronics" revenue category to "Computing and Mobile Phones" to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices.


32

Table of Contents

The following is a description of the notable comparable store sales changes in our Domestic segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 5.6%4.7% comparable store sales declineincrease was primarily due to an increase in the sales of large screen televisions, the expansion of Magnolia Design Center stores-within-a-store, and expanded assortment of streaming devices. This increase was partially offset by industry declines driven by device convergence with smartphonesin point and tablets, which has negatively impacted sales of digital imaging products, particularly compactshoot cameras and camcorders, MP3 deviceslower sales in small and accessories, and GPS navigation products.mid-size televisions.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 4.7%2.6% comparable store sales gaindecline was primarily resulted from growth in mobile phones in the first three quarters of fiscal 2014 (12-month), which was partially due to successful promotionscontinued industry declines in tablets and an increased sales mix into higher-priced smartphones. In addition, we experiencedto a comparable store sales gain in computing driven by growth in the second half of fiscal 2014 (12-month) as a result of improved inventory availability.lesser extent lower demand for mobile phones.
Entertainment: The 16.3%3.6% comparable stores sales declinedecrease was driven primarily by weak gaming salesdeclines in the first three quarters as consumers awaited the launch of new platforms in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 (12-month),music and movies due to continued industry declines as well as declines in movies and music as consumers continue to shift from physical media to digital consumption.gaming hardware.
Appliances: The 16.7%15.4% comparable store sales gain was a result of strong performance throughout fiscal 2014 (12-month) due to effective promotions,continued growth in major appliances sales as well as the addition of appliance specialists in select stores, the expansion of the small appliances category, and the positive impact of Pacific Kitchen & Home store-within-a-store concepts.stores-within-a-store.
Services: The 0.2%11.6% comparable store sales gaindecline was primarily due to growth inlower repair revenue from extended protection plan claims. This trend, which primarily related to mobile phone repair services, offset byphones, was a decline in warranty services duereflection of changes to the prior-year benefit from a periodic profit sharing payment that was earned based on the long-term performancedesign of our externally managed extended service plan portfolio that did not recur in fiscal 2014 (12-month).protection plans, improvements to our repair and fulfillment operations and industry trends.
 
Our Domestic segment experienced an increase in gross profit of $404 million, or 5.0%, in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. Excluding the $88 million of CRT/LCD litigation settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2016, we experienced an increase in gross profit of $316 million, or 3.9%. Refer to Note 12, $485 million, or 6.2%Contingencies and Commitments, in fiscal 2014 (12-month) comparedthe Notes to fiscal 2013 (11-month)the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. This rate increase was primarily due to (1) the periodic profit-share revenue described above; (2) rate improvements in computing hardware driven by our more disciplined promotional strategy; (3) an additional positive mix shift due to significantly decreased revenue in the extra monthlower-margin tablet category; (4) the positive impact of activity. Excluding the extra month,lower repair revenue

34

Table of Contents

(as discussed above), which typically earns a low gross profit declined duerate; (5) an increased mix of higher-margin large screen televisions; and (6) positive revenue impact related to a decline in the gross profit rate and lower revenue. The 0.3% of revenue decrease in the gross profit rate resulted primarily from a greater investment in price competitiveness and increased product warranty-related costs associated with higher claims frequency in mobile phones.our credit card portfolio. These itemsincreases were partially offset by LCD-related legal settlements,(1) lower rates related to large appliances; (2) a lower rate in the realizationmobile category driven by increased sales of Renew Blue cost reductionshigher priced iconic mobile phones, which have higher gross profit dollars but carry a lower gross profit rate; (3) decrease in margin for portable audio products; (4) a decreased mix of higher-margin digital imaging products; (5) an increased mix of lower-margin wearable devices; and other supply chain cost containment initiatives, and the accelerated recognition of previously deferred revenue associated with our prior credit card agreement.(6) an investment in services pricing.

Our Domestic segment's SG&A increased $278$258 million,, or 4.1%3.9%, in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month). Excluding2015. In addition, the extra monthSG&A rate increased to 19.0% of activity,revenue compared to 18.4% of revenue in the prior year. The increases in SG&A decreasedand SG&A rate were primarily from the realizationdriven by investments in growth initiatives, a greater portion of our Renew Bluevendor funding being recorded as an offset to cost reduction initiatives, tighter expense management throughout the companyof goods sold rather than SG&A and to a lesser extent, the impact of store closures in fiscal 2013 (11-month). These decreases werehigher incentive compensation. This increase was partially offset by the implementation of Renew Blue investments, including optimization of our retail floor space and the re-platforming of and functionality enhancements to bestbuy.com. These factors also contributed to the 0.7% of revenue decline in the SG&A rate.Phase 2 cost reductions.
 
Our Domestic segment recorded $123$2 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2014 (12-month), primarily related to employee termination benefits as a result2016 and incurred $4 million of Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives. These restructuring charges resulted in a decrease infiscal 2015. The restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate in fiscal 2014 (12-month) of 0.3% of revenue. In2016 and fiscal 2013 (11-month) our Domestic segment recorded restructuring charges of $328 million, which included $1 million of inventory write-downs included in cost of goods sold. The restructuring charges related to our Renew Blue and first quarter fiscal 2013 U.S. restructuring activities and consisted primarily of facility closure costs, employee termination benefits and asset impairments. These restructuring charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income in fiscal 2013 (11-month) of 1.0% of revenue.2015. Refer to Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.
 
Our Domestic segment’s operating income increased $414$148 million, or 1.0% or in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. In addition, the operating income rate increased to 4.4% of revenue in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 compared to 4.0% of revenue in the prior year. The increase was driven by higher revenue and margin and $75 million in net CRT/LCD litigation settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2013 (11-month). Excluding the extra month of activity, operating income increased primarily due to lower SG&A expenses and a decrease in restructuring,2016, partially offset by lower gross profitthe increase in SG&A as described above.
 
Fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)2014
 
For purposesDomestic segment revenue increased from $35.8 billion in fiscal 2014 to $36.1 billion in fiscal 2015, primarily driven by comparable sales growth of this section, fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents1.0%. Excluding the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 20130.5% of revenue estimated benefit associated with the classification of the new mobile carrier installment billing plans, comparable sales increased 0.5%. Online revenue was $3.5 billion, and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) represents the comparable 11-month period ended January 28, 2012.
In the first three quarters of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we experienced continued declines in comparable store sales and gross margins. Management took action to reverse these negative trends, including increased training for our retail employees and a price-match policy for online and retail store competitors during the U.S. holiday season. During the fourth quarter, we achieved comparable store sales growth of 16.7% due to: (1) improved inventory availability made possible by the chain-wide rollout of our ship-from-store capability that was completed in January 2014; (2) higher average order value; and stable gross margins.

33

Table of Contents

In fiscal 2013 (11-month), we experienced sales growth(3) increased traffic driven by greater investment in mobile phones and tablets due to continued demand for these products as new technology is introduced. We also experienced sales growth in appliances, primarily from the introduction of additional Pacific Kitchen and Home store-within-a-store locations. However, these increases were more than offset by decreases in other product categories, such as gaming, computers,online digital imaging and televisions. Certain of these products (in particular, compact cameras and camcorders and gaming) have faced declining demand due in part to the inclusion of their key features in new products, such as smartphones and tablets. In addition, the net impact from the closure of 47 large-format stores in fiscal 2013 (11-month) contributed to the overall revenue decline.marketing.

The components of the 2.6%0.6% revenue decreaseincrease in the Domestic segment in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 were as follows:
Comparable store sales impact0.9 %
Non-comparable sales(1)
(1.60.2)%
Net new storesstore changes(1.00.1)%
Total revenue decreaseincrease(2.60.6)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as credit card revenue, gift card breakage, commercial sales and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers.

The impact of net store changes did not have a material impact on our revenue is a result of store opening and closing activity during the past 11 months,in fiscal 2015, as well as stores opened in the prior year that are not included in comparable store sales due to the timing of their opening. The decrease in large-format Best Buy branded stores contributed to the majority of closures occurred in the total decrease in revenue associated with net store changes in fiscal 2013 (11-month) comparedfourth quarter and related to the comparable prior-year period.our small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores. The additionclosing of small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores partially offset the decrease, as the proportion contributed to revenue ishave a significantly smaller due toimpact given their smaller square footagesize and limited category focus compared to our large-format stores.

35

Table of Contents

The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 and 2012 (11-month recast):
2014:
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales SummaryRevenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
11 Months Ended 11 Months EndedYear Ended Year Ended
February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012 February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Consumer Electronics(1)
32% 34% (8.0)% (8.6)%31% 30% 3.7 % (5.6)%
Computing and Mobile Phones(1)
45% 42% 7.4 % 9.1 %47% 48% (0.6)% 4.7 %
Entertainment10% 12% (21.4)% (16.0)%9% 8% 4.5 % (16.3)%
Appliances6% 5% 10.1 % 10.6 %7% 7% 7.5 % 16.7 %
Services6% 6% 0.8 % (0.1)%5% 6% (11.1)% 0.2 %
Other1% 1% n/a
 n/a
1% 1% n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% (1.7)% (1.6)%100% 100% 1.0 % (0.4)%
(1)
In fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the "Consumer Electronics" revenue category to "Computing and Mobile Phones" to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices.

The following is a description of the notable comparable store sales changes in our Domestic segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 8.0%3.7% comparable store sales declineincrease was primarily driven by a decrease in the sales of digital imaging products, particularly compact cameras and camcorders, partially due to growth in televisions, with strong sales increases in Ultra-HD television. This was partially offset by declines in DVD/Blu-ray players, as online streaming continues to increase, and cameras, as device convergence with smartphones. In addition, we experienced a decrease in television revenue due primarily to a decrease in average selling price from an increased sales mix of smallsmartphones and mid-sized televisions.tablets continued.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 7.4%0.6% comparable store sales gaindecline primarily resulted primarily from increaseda significant decrease in tablets due to industry declines. This decline was partially offset by an increase in sales of computers, as well as an increase in sales of mobile phones due to an increased mix of higher-priced smartphones and new product launches, as well as increased sales of tablets and e-Readers driven by new product launches, consumer demandthe introduction of mobile carrier installment billing plans and continued expansionhigher year over year selling prices. Excluding the impact of available platforms. The strong performance frominstallment billing, mobile phones, tablets and e-Readers was partially offset by a decline inphone comparable sales of notebook and desktop computers.declined.
Entertainment: The 21.4%4.5% comparable stores sales declineincrease was mainlydriven primarily by gaming sales from new platforms launched in the resultfourth quarter of a declinefiscal 2014, partially offset by the continuing declines in gaming duemovies and music as consumers continue to aging gaming platforms, fewer new software releasesshift from physical media to online streaming and the migration of casual gamers to other platforms, such as tablets and smartphones.downloads.
Appliances: The 10.1%7.5% comparable store sales gain was a result of strong performance throughout fiscal 2015 due to the implementation of operational improvements, includingeffective promotions, the addition of moreappliance specialists in select stores and the positive impact of Pacific Kitchen and& Home store-within-a-store concepts, promotional effectiveness and improved performance in small appliances.concepts.

34

Table of Contents

Services: The 0.8%11.1% comparable store sales gaindecline was primarily due to the benefit from a periodic profit sharing payment that was earned based on the long-term performance of the our externally managed extended service plan portfolio, partially offset by a decrease in thelower mobile repair revenue and lower sales of notebook computers, which contributed to fewer service products sales opportunities.extended warranty plans driven by lower attach rates.

Our Domestic segment experienced a decrease in gross profit of $438$194 million, or 5.3%2.3%, in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast), driven by lower revenue and a decline2014. The most significant driver of the decrease was $314 million of LCD legal settlement proceeds that we received in thefiscal 2014. Excluding these LCD settlements, we experienced an increase in gross profit rate. The 0.7% of revenue decrease in$120 million, and the gross profit rate resulted primarilyincreased 0.2% of revenue. The primary drivers of the gross profit rate increase were: (1) the benefit from the following factors:

realization of our Renew Blue cost reductions and other supply chain cost containment initiatives (including initiatives related to returns, replacements and damages); (2) a more structured and analytical approach to pricing, notably the fourth quarter; and (3) increased promotional activity, notablyrevenue in computing, home theater, MP3 players and movies; and
an increased mix of smartphones with higher average selling prices but a lower margin rate;
partiallyhigher-margin large-screen televisions. These increases were offset by an improvementa mix shift into lower-margin gaming and computing categories and a highly competitive promotional environment in sales mix due to decreased sales of computing and gaming products.tablets.

Our Domestic segment's SG&A grew $174decreased $367 million, or 2.7%5.2%, in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast).2014. In addition, the SG&A rate decreased by 1.2% of revenue compared to the prior year. The increasedecreases in SG&A wasand SG&A rate were primarily driven by an increase in field incentive compensationthe realization of Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and executive retention and transition costs, costs related to the addition of 104 net new Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores, and increased investments in advertising and other costs to drive online sales. This increase wasbenefit from tighter expense management throughout the company. These declines were partially offset by lower expenses as a result of large-format store closures. The SG&A rate increased by 1.1% of revenue as a result of the deleveraging impact of the revenue decline,Renew Blue investments in online growth and our in-store experience, as well as from the aforementioned factors.higher incentive compensation.

Our Domestic segment recorded $328$4 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month), which included $12015 and incurred $123 million of inventory write-downs included in cost of goods sold. The restructuring charges related to our Renew Blue and first quarterin fiscal 2013 U.S. restructuring activities and consisted primarily of facility closure costs, employee termination benefits and asset impairments.2014. These restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate in fiscal 2015 and resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2014 of 1.0%0.3% of revenue. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.
Our Domestic segment’s operating income increased $292 million, or 0.8% of revenue, in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. The increase was driven by lower SG&A, a comparable sales gain and lower restructuring charges, partially offset by the decrease in gross profit from the prior-year LCD settlements described above.

36

Table of Contents

International Segment

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we consolidated the Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores and the conversion of the remaining 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand. The costs of implementing these changes primarily consisted of lease exit costs, a tradename impairment, property and equipment impairments, employee termination benefits and inventory write-downs. In fiscal 2016, we incurred total pre-tax restructuring charges, other Canadian brand consolidation charges (charges that did not qualify as restructuring charges) and property and equipment impairment of $209 million of out of the previously disclosed expected range of approximately $210 million to $250 million related to those actions. As we continue to solidify our strategy for our Canada transformation, we may incur additional charges of up to $35 million in future periods primarily related to non-restructuring asset impairments.

The following table presents selected financial data for our International segment for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
International Segment Performance Summary 2016 2015 2014
Revenue $3,163
 $4,284
 $4,780
Revenue decline % (26.2)% (10.4)% (5.0)%
Comparable sales % decline(1)
 n/a
 (3.5)% (5.1)%
Restructuring charges - cost of goods sold $3
 $
 $
Gross profit $707
 $967
 $1,125
Gross profit as % of revenue 22.4 % 22.6 % 23.5 %
SG&A $721
 $953
 $1,100
SG&A as % of revenue 22.8 % 22.2 % 23.0 %
Restructuring charges $196
 $1
 $26
Operating income (loss) $(210) $13
 $(1)
Operating income (loss) as % of revenue (6.6)% 0.3 %  %
(1)The Canadian brand consolidation has a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, all store and website revenue has been removed from the comparable sales base, and an International segment (comprised of Canada and Mexico) comparable sales metric has not been provided.

The following table reconciles our International segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years:
 Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016
 Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Stores Converted Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Canada               
   Future Shop137
 1
 (5) 133
 
 (68) (65) 
   Best Buy72
 
 (1) 71
 3
 (3) 65
 136
   Best Buy Mobile56
 
 
 56
 
 
 
 56
Mexico               
   Best Buy17
 1
 
 18
 
 
 
 18
   Express2
 3
 
 5
 1
 
 
 6
Total International segment stores284
 5
 (6) 283
 4
 (71) 
 216

Fiscal 2016 Results Compared With Fiscal 2015

In our International segment, revenue declined 26.2% to $3.2 billion in fiscal 2016 due to (1) the loss of revenue associated with closed stores as part of the Canadian brand consolidation; (2) a negative foreign currency impact of 12.5%; and (3) ongoing softness in the Canadian economy and consumer electronics industry.

37

Table of Contents

The components of the International segment's 26.2% revenue decrease in fiscal 2016 were as follows:
Non-comparable sales(1)
(13.7)%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(12.5)%
Total revenue decrease(26.2)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity, including the Canadian brand consolidation activity, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages by revenue category in fiscal 2016 and 2015:
 Revenue Mix Summary
 Year Ended
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Consumer Electronics31% 30%
Computing and Mobile Phones48% 49%
Entertainment9% 9%
Appliances5% 5%
Services6% 6%
Other1% 1%
Total100% 100%

As noted above, comparable sales information has not been provided for the International segment for fiscal 2016 due to the Canadian brand consolidation. As such, it is also impractical to provide such information on a revenue category basis. However, as noted above, the revenue mix by category has not changed significantly from fiscal 2015.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit decline of $260 million, or 26.9%, in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in gross profit was $141 million. The gross profit rate declined to 22.4% of revenue in fiscal 2016 from 22.6% of revenue in fiscal 2015. This decline was primarily due to the disruptive impacts from the Canadian brand consolidation and increased promotional activity in Canada.

Our International segment's SG&A decreased $232 million, or 24.3%, in fiscal 2016 compared to the prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in SG&A was $115 million. However, the SG&A expense rate increased to 22.8% of revenue in fiscal 2016 from 22.2% of revenue in fiscal 2015. The decrease in SG&A expense was driven by the elimination of expenses associated with closed stores as part of the Canadian brand consolidation. The increase in the SG&A rate was driven by year-over-year sales deleverage.

Our International segment recorded $199 million of restructuring charges of $38 million, including $19in fiscal 2016 and incurred $1 million of inventory write-downs included in cost of goods sold,restructuring charges in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast).2015. The fiscal 2016 restructuring charges primarily related to the Canadian brand consolidation and consisted of facility closure costs, andtradename impairments, property and equipment impairments, related toand employee termination benefits. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2015 had an immaterial impact on our fiscal 2012 restructuring activities, as well as inventory write-downs and facility closure costs related primarily to our fiscal 2011 restructuring activities.operating income rate. Refer to Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

Our International segment operating loss of $210 million in fiscal 2016 compared to income of $13 million in the prior-year period. The $923 million decreasedecline in our Domestic segment's operating income for fiscal 2013 (11-month) was principally the result ofdriven primarily by a decrease in revenue and gross profit rate and restructuring charges, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses as described above.

Fiscal 2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2014

Our international segment experienced a resultdecrease in revenue of large-format10.4% primarily driven by the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, a comparable sales decline of 3.5%, and the loss of revenue from store closures and a comparable store sales decline, as well as an increase in restructuring charges.

International

The following table presents selected financial data for our International segment for each of the past three fiscal years and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) ($ in millions):
  12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
International Segment Performance Summary 2014 2013 2012 2012
      (recast)  
Revenue $6,579
 $6,605
 $7,209
 $7,861
Revenue gain (decline) % (0.4)% (8.4)% n/a
 6.8 %
Comparable store sales % decline (3.1)% (11.4)% (1.5)% (1.1)%
Gross profit $1,416
 $1,509
 $1,681
 $1,805
Gross profit as a % of revenue 21.5 % 22.8 % 23.3 % 23.0 %
SG&A $1,385
 $1,453
 $1,432
 $1,564
SG&A as a % of revenue 21.1 % 22.0 % 19.9 % 19.9 %
Restructuring charges $36
 $87
 $5
 $5
Goodwill impairments $
 $819
 $
 $
Operating income (loss) $(5) $(850) $244
 $236
Operating income (loss) as a % of revenue (0.1)% (12.9)% 3.4 % 3.0 %

Canada.

3538

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our International segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years:
 Fiscal 2012 
Fiscal 2013 (11-Month)(1)
 Fiscal 2014
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Canada             
Future Shop149
 
 (9) 140
 
 (3) 137
Best Buy77
 2
 (7) 72
 
 
 72
Best Buy Mobile stand-alone30
 19
 
 49
 7
 
 56
China             
Five Star204
 12
 (5) 211
 2
 (24) 189
Mexico             
Best Buy8
 6
 
 14
 3
 
 17
Express
 1
 
 1
 1
 
 2
Total International segment stores468
 40
 (21) 487
 13
 (27) 473
(1)Fiscal 2013 (11-month) includes store opening and closing activity for the month of January for China and Mexico.

Fiscal 2014 (12-month) Results Compared With Fiscal 2013 (11-month)

For purposes of this section, fiscal 2014 (12-month) represents the 12-month period ended February 1, 2014 and fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 2013.

In fiscal 2014 (12-month), we experienced differing comparable store sales in the various geographies in our International segment. In Canada, we experienced a comparable store sales decline, as sales were negatively impacted by lower industry demand for consumer electronics. In China, we experienced a comparable store sales gain primarily due to a government subsidy program that ended in May 2013, which positively impacted appliance sales, partially offset by increased competition from online competitors putting pressure on prices across most product categories. We also started to implement our Renew Blue initiatives in our International segment in fiscal 2014 (12-month). While our International segment continues to experience revenue and gross profit challenges, we have made progress in stabilizing comparable store sales and reducing SG&A expenses. Increased promotional activity and a higher mix of lower-margin products in Canada contributed to a decline in our gross profit rate. The SG&A rate decline was primarily driven by Renew Blue cost reductions and tighter expense management in Canada, and the elimination of expenses associated with previously closed stores in Canada and China.

The components of the International segment's 0.4%10.4% revenue decrease in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2015 were as follows:
Extra monthImpact of revenue(1)
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations
7.4(6.4)%
Comparable store sales impact(2.83.4)%
Net store changes(2.4)%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(2.40.9)%
Non-comparable sales(2)(1)
(0.20.3)%
Total revenue decrease(0.410.4)%
(1)
Represents the incremental revenue in fiscal 2014, which had 12 months of activity compared to 11 months in fiscal 2013 as a result of our fiscal year-end change. Refer to Note 2, Fiscal Year-end Change, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
(2)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable store sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

The net closure of large-format stores in Canada at the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month), as well as large-format Five Star store closures in China over the past 12 months, contributed to the majority of the decrease in revenue associated with net store changes in our International segment in fiscal 2014 (12-month).2015. The addition of large-formatlarge and small-format stores in Mexico and small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in Canada partially offset these decreases.this decrease.


36

Table of Contents

The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2015 and 2013 (11-month):2014:
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales SummaryRevenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
12 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended 11 Months EndedYear Ended Year Ended
February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Consumer Electronics(1)
28% 31% (9.4)% (16.4)%30% 29% (5.1)% (9.7)%
Computing and Mobile Phones(1)
40% 39% (1.7)% (4.3)%49% 50% (2.8)% (1.7)%
Entertainment7% 8% (9.3)% (17.4)%9% 10% (5.2)% (9.3)%
Appliances20% 17% 8.4 % (15.1)%5% 5% (0.5)% (1.5)%
Services5% 5% (5.3)% (10.0)%6% 6% (4.7)% (6.3)%
Other<1%
 <1%
 n/a
 n/a
1% <1%
 n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% (3.1)% (11.4)%100% 100% (3.5)% (5.1)%
(1)
In fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the "Consumer Electronics" revenue category to "Computing and Mobile Phones" to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices.

The following is a description of the notable comparable store sales changes in our International segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 9.4%5.1% comparable store sales decline was driven primarily by a decrease in sales of televisions, digital imaging products, televisions and MP3 devices and accessories.devices. The declines in digital imaging products and MP3 devices and accessories were a result of device convergence similarand industry declines. The decrease in sales of televisions was due to trends seenoverall market softness across the segment and competitive pressures in the Domestic segment.Canada.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 1.7%2.8% comparable store sales decline was caused primarily by a decrease in sales of computers and computer accessories,tablets due to industry declines, partially offset by increased tabletmobile phone sales.
Entertainment: The 9.3%5.2% comparable store sales decline principally in Canada, reflectedwas driven by a decrease in sales of movies dueand music as customers continue to a lack of new releases and weakshift from physical media to digital consumption, partially offset by gaming sales in Canada due to the first three quarters, as consumers awaited the launchrelease of new gaming platforms in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 (12-month).2014.
Appliances: The 8.4%0.5% comparable store sales gain was primarily due to effective promotional offers and an increase in sales of air conditioners in China helped by periods of unseasonably warm weather.
Services: The 5.3% comparable store sales decline was primarilydriven by Mexico due to a decrease in sales of extendedkitchen appliances, partially offset by appliance sales increases in Canada from expansion of offerings and assortment.
Services: The 4.7% comparable sales decline was due to a decrease in sales of warranties in Canada driven by the overall comparable store sales decline and a change in product mix,applicable hardware, particularly intablets and televisions.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit decline of $93$158 million,, or 6.2%14.0%, in fiscal 2014 (12-month), driven primarily by revenue declines in Canada and China and a2015 compared to fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in thegross profit was $88 million. The gross profit rate which were partially offset by an extra monthdecline of activity. The 1.3%0.9% of revenue decrease in the gross profit rate was driven by Canada due to increased promotional activity and, an increased mix ofto a lesser extent, higher revenue in the lower-margin products, primarily in Canada.gaming category.

Our International segment's SG&A decreased $68$147 million,, or 4.7%13.4%, in fiscal 2014 (12-month) due2015 compared to savings from previousthe prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in SG&A was $81 million. In addition, the SG&A rate decreased by 0.8% of revenue in fiscal 2015. The decrease in SG&A and SG&A rate was primarily driven by Renew Blue cost reductions and store closures in Canada and China and Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by an extra month of activity. The SG&A rate also decreased by 0.9% of revenue as a result of the aforementioned factors.Canada.

Our International segment recorded $36$1 million and $87 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2015 and 2013 (11-month), respectively. The fiscal 2014 (12-month) restructuring charges primarily related to employee termination benefits as a result$26 million of Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month) also related to our Renew Blue initiatives and consisted of facility closure costs, property and equipment impairments, and employee termination benefits. These2014. The restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate in fiscal 2015 and resulted in a

39


decrease in our operating income rate in fiscal 2014 (12-month) and fiscal 2013 (11-month) of 0.5% of revenue and 1.3% of revenue, respectively.revenue. Refer to Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

During fiscal 2014 (12-month), we recorded no goodwill impairment charges compared to $819Our International segment operating income of $13 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month).2015 compared to a loss of $1 million in the prior-year period. The improvement in operating income was driven primarily by a decrease in SG&A, partially offset by a decrease in gross profit as described above.

Additional Consolidated Results

Other Income (Expense)

In fiscal 2016, our gain on sale of investments was $2 million compared to $13 million and $20 million in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. These gains were due to the sale of cost-based investments.

In fiscal 2016, our investment income and other was $13 million, compared to $14 million in the prior year. The decrease in fiscal 2016 was primarily due to lower interest rates in Canada and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translations. In fiscal 2015, our investment income and other was $14 million, compared to $19 million in fiscal 2014. The decrease in fiscal 2015 was due to lower returns on our deferred compensation assets, partially offset by an increase in interest income driven by higher average cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.

Interest expense was $80 million in fiscal 2016, compared to $90 million in fiscal 2015. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to swapping a portion of our fixed rate debt to floating rate, which was lower than our fixed rate. Refer to Note 1,6, Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesDerivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about theadditional information. Interest expense was $90 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month) goodwill impairment.

2015, compared to $100 million in fiscal 2014. The decrease in the International segment's operating loss in fiscal 2014 (12-month)interest expense was primarily due to obtaining a lower interest rate of 5.00% on our 2018 Notes compared to our previously held notes that bore interest at 6.75%.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased to $503 million in fiscal 2016, compared to a tax expense of $141 million in the decreased goodwill impairment and restructuring charges,prior year, primarily due to a $353 million discrete benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities in the prior year period, as well as a lower mix of pre-tax earnings from foreign operations in fiscal 2016, partially offset by a decrease in gross profit.

37


Fiscal 2013 (11-month) Results Compared With Fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)

For purposes of this section, fiscal 2013 (11-month) represents the 11-month transition period ended February 2, 2013 and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) represents the comparable 11-month period ended January 28, 2012.

We experienced a comparable store sales decline in our International segment. In Canada, comparable store sales declines were the result of overall industry softness leading to declines in televisions, computers and gaming, which were partially offset by increased sales of mobile phones and tablets. In China, increased competition from online competitors pressured prices across most product categories, while the end of certain government stimulus programs in December 2011 continued to have a negative impact on appliances. The combination of lower sales in Canada and China, as well as a decrease in the gross profit rate due to greater promotional activity, resulted in lower gross profit and operating income in our International segment.

The components of the International segment's 8.4% revenue decreasepre-tax earnings in fiscal 2013 (11-month) were as follows:
Comparable store sales impact(11.0)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
(0.5)%
Net store changes2.7 %
Impact of foreign currency exchange2016. Our effective income tax rate ("ETR") for fiscal 2016 was 38.4%, compared to a rate fluctuations0.4 %
Total revenue decrease(8.4)%
(1)
Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable store sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

The addition of 20 large-format stores throughout the International segment10.1% in fiscal 2013 (11-month) (Five Star, Best Buy Mexico and Best Buy Canada) contributed to2015. Excluding the majority of the change in revenue associated with net new stores. The impact of reorganizing certain European legal entities, the closure of 21 large-format stores in the International segment (Future Shop, Best Buy Canada and Five Star) had minimal impact on revenue, as the majority of the closures occurred late in the fourth quarter. The addition of 20 small-format stores, including 19 new small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in Canada, had a significantly smaller impact on the overall revenue change given their smaller square footage compared to our large-format stores.

The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable store sales percentage changes by revenue categoryETR would have been 35.6% in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and 2012 (11-month recast):
 Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Store Sales Summary
 11 Months Ended 11 Months Ended
 February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012 February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012
Consumer Electronics(1)
31% 33% (16.4)% (7.8)%
Computing and Mobile Phones(1)
39% 37% (4.3)% 7.2 %
Entertainment8% 8% (17.4)% (13.4)%
Appliances17% 17% (15.1)% 2.9 %
Services5% 5% (10.0)% (6.4)%
Other<1%
 <1%
 n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% (11.4)% (1.5)%
(1)
In fiscal 2014, e-Readers were moved from the "Consumer Electronics" revenue category to "Computing and Mobile Phones" to reflect the continued convergence of their features with tablets and other computing devices.

The following is a description of the notable comparable store sales changes in our International segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 16.4% comparable store sales decline was driven primarily by decreases in sales of televisions, MP3 devices and digital imaging products, primarily in Canada, as a result of industry softness and device convergence similar to that experienced within our Domestic segment.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 4.3% comparable store sales decline was caused primarily from a decline in sales of notebook and desktop computers. These declines were partially offset by an increase in sales of mobile phones and tablets in Canada.
Entertainment: The 17.4% comparable store sales decline was primarily from decreases in gaming in Canada as a result of factors similar to those experienced in our Domestic segment.

38


Appliances: The 15.1% comparable store sales decline was primarily due to a decrease in sales of appliances in our Five Star operations due to a slowdown in the housing market and the end of certain government stimulus programs in China in December 2011.
Services: The 10.0% comparable store sales decline was primarily due to a decrease in services in Canada.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit decline of $172 million, or 10.2%, in fiscal 2013 (11-month), driven primarily by revenue declines in Canada and China and a gross profit rate decline in Canada. The 0.5% of revenue decrease in the gross profit rate was due to special vendor-driven promotions in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) that were not repeated in fiscal 2013 (11-month), especially on televisions in Canada.

Our International segment's SG&A increased $21 million, or 1.5%, in fiscal 2013 (11-month). The increase in SG&A was driven by increased store asset impairments, partially offset by lower spending in Canada. The deleveraging impact of negative comparable store sales in Five Star and Canada contributed to the SG&A rate increase.

Our International segment recorded $87 million and $5 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and 2012 (11-month recast), respectively. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2013 (11-month) related to our Renew Blue restructuring activities and consisted of facility closure costs, employee termination benefits, and property and equipment impairments. The fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) charges related to our fiscal 2012 restructuring program and consisted of property and equipment impairments. The restructuring charges resulted in a decrease in our operating income in fiscal 2013 (11-month) of 1.3% of revenue.2015. Refer to Note 6,10, Restructuring ChargesIncome Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.additional information.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we recorded a $819 million goodwill impairment charge relatedIncome tax expense decreased to our Best Buy Canada and Five Star reporting units. The impairments followed significant deterioration in operating performance in the latter part of fiscal 2013 (11-month), with results falling significantly below management forecasts. As a result of this decline in performance, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), management updated long-range forecasts for the two reporting units. This analysis led to the conclusion that the goodwill had no value, and therefore full impairments were recorded. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about the goodwill impairment.

The International segment's operating loss in fiscal 2013 (11-month) compared to operating income in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) was primarily due to the goodwill impairment. In addition, the decrease in revenue, combined with the decline in the gross profit rate and the increase in restructuring charges, contributed to the decrease compared to the prior-year period.

Additional Consolidated Results

Other Income (Expense)

In fiscal 2014 (12-month), we recognized a gain of $20 million in connection with the exercise of a warrant and the sale of cost-based investments. In fiscal 2012 (11-month recast), we sold our shares of common stock in TalkTalk Telecom Group PLC and Carphone Warehouse Group plc for $112 million and recorded a pre-tax gain of $55 million related to the sale.

In fiscal 2014 (12-month), our investment income and other was $27 million, compared to $20$141 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month). The increase in fiscal 2014 (12-month) was primarily due to higher average cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments balances. In fiscal 2013 (11-month), our investment income and other was $20 million,2015, compared to $23a tax expense of $388 million in the fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). The decrease in fiscal 2013 (11-month) was2014, primarily due to a lower average cash and cash equivalents balance,$353 million discrete benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities, partially offset by a higher weighted average interest rate on cash balances.

Interest expense was $100 million in fiscal 2014 (12-month), compared to $99 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month). The relatively flat interest expense was the result of an extra month of expense in fiscal 2014 (12-month), offset by a decrease in interest expense as a result of replacing our previous 2013 Notes that bore interest at 6.75% with 2018 Notes that bear interest at 5.00%. Interest expense was $99 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month), compared to $101 million in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). The reduction in interest expense from the repayment of our convertible debt in January 2012 was offset by an increase in interest expense on our $1 billion of long-term debt securities that remained outstanding for all 11 monthspre-tax earnings in fiscal 2013 (11-month), compared to 9 months in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast).


39


Effective Income Tax Rate

Our effective income tax rate ("ETR") was 36.7% in fiscal 2014 (12-month), compared to (135.8)% in fiscal 2013 (11-month). Excluding the impact of the goodwill impairments (which are not tax deductible), the ETR would have been 43.1% in fiscal 2013 (11-month). The ETR in fiscal 2014 (12-month) was lower than in fiscal 2013 (11-month), excluding the goodwill impairments, as fiscal 2013 (11-month) was higher than normal as a result of decreased tax benefits from foreign operations, which were due primarily to a decrease in foreign earnings and a valuation allowance on U.S. federal foreign tax credits.

current-year period. Our ETR was (135.8)%10.1% in fiscal 2013 (11-month) (43.1% excluding the impact of goodwill impairments),2015, compared to 35.1%35.8% in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). The ETR in fiscal 2013 (11-month), excluding goodwill impairments, was higher than fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) due to the previously discussed decrease in tax benefits from foreign operations.2014.

Our consolidated effective tax rateETR is impacted by the statutory income tax rates applicable to each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. As our foreign earnings are generally taxed at lower statutory rates than the 35% U.S. federal statutory rate, changes in the proportion of our consolidated taxable earnings originating in foreign jurisdictions impact our consolidated effective rate. Our foreign earnings have been indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. and are not subject to current U.S. income tax.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations consists primarily of our large-format Best Buy branded stores in ChinaEurope and Turkey and Best Buy EuropeFive Star in our International segment, as well as Napster and mindSHIFT in our Domestic segment.

The earnings from discontinued operations was $90 million in fiscal 2016 compared to a loss of $11 million and $172 million in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Earnings in fiscal 2016 were due to the gain recognized on the sale of Five Star. The loss from discontinued operations of $11 million in fiscal 2015 was driven by charges related to Five Star. The loss from discontinued operation of $172 million in fiscal 2014 (12-month) compared to a gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2013 (11-month) was primarily due to the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe, as well as the loss on the sale of mindSHIFT in fiscal 2014 (12-month).mindSHIFT.

The gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2013 (11-month) compared to a loss from discontinued operations in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) was primarily due to the non-cash impairment charge of $1.2 billion to write-off the goodwill related to our Best Buy Europe reporting unit in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) and the U.K. large-format stores and Napster having been largely inactive during fiscal 2013 (11-month), whereas they were still operating during fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). In addition, we recognized a benefit from positive adjustments to estimated facility closure costs associated with the closure of our Best Buy branded stores in the U.K. in fiscal 2013 (11-month).

Net Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The decrease in net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal 2014 (12-month) compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month) was due to a net loss in fiscal 2014 (12-month) in Best Buy Europe compared to net earnings in fiscal 2013 (11-month).

The decrease in net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests in fiscal 2013 (11-month) compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) was due to the Mobile buy-out in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 (11-month recast). As a result of the Mobile buy-out, CPW was no longer entitled to a portion of the profit share payments to Best Buy Europe, our subsidiary included in discontinued operations in which CPW previously held a 50% noncontrolling interest. In addition, net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests also decreased due to a decline in net earnings of Best Buy Europe.

Refer to Note 3, Profit Share Buy-Out, of the Notes to ConsolidatedNon-GAAP Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about the Mobile buy-out.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

Highly competitive market conditions and the general economic environment minimized inflation's impact on the selling prices of our products and services, and on our expenses. In addition, price deflation and the continued commoditization of certain technology products limited our ability to increase our gross profit rate.Measures


40


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The periods used for analysis of non-GAAP financial performance represent the periods that management used internally to assess performance in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013. As a result of the change in our fiscal year in fiscal 2013, some of the periods included in this section of our MD&A differ from the audited periods included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and as such, these periods are also different than those analyzed within the Results of Operations section of the MD&A.performance.

The following table reconciles operating income, effective income tax rate, net earnings and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented from continuing operations (GAAP financial measures) to adjustednon-GAAP operating income, adjustednon-GAAP effective income tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings and adjustednon-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (non-GAAP financial measures) for the periods presented ($ in millions, except per share amounts).
:
  
12-Month(1)
  2014 2013 2012
    (recast) (recast)
Operating income $1,140
 $169
 $2,095
Restructuring charges – cost of goods sold 
 1
 19
Net LCD settlements(2)
 (229) 
 
Best Buy Europe transaction costs 
 
 12
Non-restructuring asset impairments 101
 60
 11
Restructuring charges 159
 420
 27
Goodwill impairments 
 822
 
Adjusted operating income $1,171
 $1,472
 $2,164
       
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations $687
 $(271) $1,344
After-tax impact of restructuring charges – cost of goods sold 
 1
 12
After-tax impact of net LCD settlements(2)
 (142) 
 
After-tax impact of Best Buy Europe transaction costs 
 
 8
After-tax impact of non-restructuring asset impairments 67
 41
 8
After-tax impact of restructuring charges 104
 271
 16
After-tax impact of goodwill impairments 
 821
 
After-tax impact of gain on sale of investments (12) 
 (48)
Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(3)
 18
 
 
Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations $722
 $863
 $1,340
       
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations $1.98
 $(0.80) $3.55
Per share impact of restructuring charges – cost of goods sold 
 
 0.03
Per share impact of net LCD settlements(2)
 (0.41) 
 
Per share impact of Best Buy Europe transaction costs 
 
 0.02
Per share impact of non-restructuring asset impairments 0.19
 0.12
 0.02
Per share impact of restructuring charges 0.30
 0.80
 0.05
Per share impact of goodwill impairments 
 2.42
 
Per share impact of gain on sale of investments (0.04) 
 (0.13)
Per share impact of income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(3)
 0.05
 
 
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations $2.07
 $2.54
 $3.54
 Fiscal Year
 2016 2015 2014
Operating income$1,375
 $1,450
 $1,144
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(77) 
 (229)
  Restructuring charges - COGS3
 
 
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
6
 
 
  Non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A61
 42
 99
  Restructuring charges198
 5
 149
Non-GAAP operating income$1,566
 $1,497
 $1,163
      
Income tax expense$503
 $141
 $388
  Effective tax rate
38.4% 10.1% 35.8%
  Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(5)

 
 (18)
  Income tax impact of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 353
 
  Income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
30
 11
 (8)
Non-GAAP Income tax expense$533
 $505
 $362
  Non-GAAP Effective tax rate
35.4% 35.5% 33.5%
      
Net earnings from continuing operations$807
 $1,246
 $695
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(77) 
 (229)
  Restructuring charges - COGS3
 
 
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
6
 
 
  Non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A61
 42
 99
  Restructuring charges198
 5
 149
  (Gain) loss on sale of investments5
 (11) (19)
  Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale (5)

 
 18
  Income tax impact of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 (353) 
  Income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
(30) (11) 8
Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations$973
 $918
 $721
      
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
  Per share impact of net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(0.22) 
 (0.66)
  Per share impact of restructuring charges - COGS0.01
 
 
  Per share impact of other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
0.02
 
 
  Per share impact of non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A0.17
 0.12
 0.29
  Per share impact of restructuring charges0.58
 0.01
 0.43
  Per share impact of (gain) loss on sale of investments0.01
 (0.03) (0.06)
  Per share income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(5)

 
 0.05
  Per share income tax effect of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 (1.00) 
  Per share income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
(0.09) (0.03) 0.02
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.78
 $2.60
 $2.07
(1)The 12-month periods represent: the 12-months ended February 1, 2014 ("2014"); the recast 12-months ended February 2, 2013 ("2013");Represents CRT/LCD litigation settlements reached in each reported period, net of related legal fees and the recast 12-months ended January 28, 2012 ("2012"). 2014 and 2012 included 52 weeks, while 2013 included 53 weeks.costs.


41


(2)
Represents gross LCD settlement proceeds recorded in cost of goods sold less associated legal costs recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses for settlements reached in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Settlements reached priorcharges related to the second quarter of fiscal 2014 areCanadian brand consolidation, primarily due to retention bonuses and other store-related costs, that did not included. See Note 13, Contingencies and Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
qualify as restructuring charges.
(3)Represents the acceleration of a non-cash tax benefit of $353 million as a result of reorganizing certain European legal entities to simplify our overall structure in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
(4)Income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments is the summation of the calculated income tax charge related to each non-GAAP non-income tax adjustment. Income tax charge is calculated using the statutory tax rates in effect during the period of the related non-GAAP adjustment.
(5)Represents the tax impact of the Best Buy Europe sale and resulting required tax allocation between continuing and discontinued operations.

AdjustedNon-GAAP operating income decreased $301for fiscal 2016 increased $69 million in 2014 compared to 2013, and adjusted operating income as a percent of revenue decreased to 2.8%.fiscal 2015. The decrease in operating incomeincrease was primarily driven by the extra week of operations in 2013 and a decreaseincreased revenue in the Domestic segment, increased Enterprise gross profit rate (adjusted to exclude LCD-related legal settlementsand continued SG&A cost reductions in the second quarter of 2014). This decrease was partially offset by lower SG&A spendingboth segments primarily due to the realization of our Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and tighter expense managementmanagement. The increase in both the Domestic and International segments. These same factors contributed to thenon-GAAP operating income resulted in a year-over-year decreasesincrease in adjustednon-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and adjustednon-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in 2014fiscal 2016 compared to the prior-year period.fiscal 2015.

AdjustedNon-GAAP operating income decreased $692for fiscal 2015 increased $334 million in 2013 compared to 2012,fiscal 2014, and adjustednon-GAAP operating income as a percent of revenue decreasedincreased to 3.4%3.7%. The decreaseincrease in non-GAAP operating income was primarily driven by a decreaseSG&A cost reductions in revenueboth segments primarily due to Domestic store closures in 2013, a decrease in the gross profit raterealization of our Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and an increase in SG&A spending, primarily in our Domestic segment, due to increases in field incentive compensation and executive retention and transition costs. These factors weretighter expense management, partially offset by the extra week of operationsa decline in 2013. These same factors contributed to therevenue in our International segment. The increase in non-GAAP operating income resulted in a year-over-year decreasesincrease in adjustednon-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and adjustednon-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in 2013fiscal 2015 compared to the prior-year period.fiscal 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary

We closely manage our liquidity and capital resources. Our liquidity requirements depend on key variables, including the level of investment required to support our Renew Blue priorities, discretionary SG&A spending,business strategies, the performance of our business, capital expenditures, credit facilities and short-term borrowing arrangements and working capital management. Capital expenditures are a component of our cash flow and capital management strategy which, to a large extent, we can adjust in response to economic and other changes in our business environment. We have a disciplined approach to capital allocation, which focuses on investing in key priorities that support our Renew Blue transformation.

We ended fiscal 2014 (12-month) with $2.7 billion ofThe following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents compared to $1.8 billionand short-term investments at the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month). January 30, 2016, and January 31, 2015 ($ in millions):
 January 30, 2016
 January 31, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents$1,976
 $2,432
Short-term investments1,305
 1,456
Total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments$3,281
 $3,888

The increasedecrease in cash and cash equivalents from January 31, 2015, was primarily due primarily to cash provided by operationsa resumption of share repurchases, a special dividend and cash froman increase in the sale of Best Buy Europe and mindSHIFT,regular quarterly dividend. This was partially offset by cash used for capital expenditures and the payment of dividends. Working capital, the excess of current assets over current liabilities, was $3.0 billion at the end of fiscal 2014 (12-month), an increasegenerated from $1.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month). Operating cash flow decreased $360 million to $1.1 billion in fiscal 2014 (12-month) compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month) and capital expenditures decreased $158 million compared to the prior-year period.operating activities.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 2012 2012
    (recast)  2016 2015 2014
Total cash provided by (used in):            
Operating activities$1,094
 $1,454
 $3,097
 $3,293
$1,322
 $1,935
 $1,094
Investing activities(517) (538) (647) (724)(419) (1,712) (517)
Financing activities319
 (211) (2,141) (2,478)(1,515) (223) 319
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(44) (4) (6) 5
(38) (52) (44)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents$852
 $701
 $303
 $96
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(650) $(52) $852

42



Operating Activities

The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 was primarily due to increased cash outflows forthe timing of inventory receipts and income tax payments. During fiscal 2016, we decided to bring Holiday inventory in early and the Super Bowl shifted to the first quarter of fiscal 2017, which caused us to hold our inventory longer and settle our accounts payable partially offset by improvedrelated to that inventory management and increased cash inflow from receivables.prior to year-end. In addition, we paid more income taxes in fiscal 2016 primarily due to the timing of when payments were made.

The decreaseincrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)2014 was primarily due to lower gross profitimproved management of working capital in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and larger cash payments for employee termination benefits and facility closure costs.2015. Additionally, in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)2014 there were larger cash inflowsoutflows from the normalization of accounts payable, following unusually lowhigh balances at the end of fiscal 20112013 due to the timing of merchandise receipts in the fourth quarter. These items were partially offset by an aggressive inventory reduction plan and other working capital and cash flow management initiatives implemented towards the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month).receipts.

Investing Activities

The decrease in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 was primarily due to lower capital expenditures and proceeds from the dispositionincreased sales of mindSHIFT,short-term investments partially offset by purchases of short-term investments in fiscal 2014 (12-month)capital expenditures (see Capital Expenditures below).

The decreaseincrease in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast)2014 was primarily due to a reduction in cash used for acquisitionsincreased purchases of businessesshort-term investments in fiscal 2013 (11-month), offset partially by a decrease in cash received from the sale of investments.2015.

Financing Activities

The increase in cash used by financing activities in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily due to share repurchases and dividend payments. In fiscal 2016, we purchased $1.0 billion of common stock as part of our June 2011 share repurchase program. In addition, we increased our normal dividend from 2015 to 2016 and paid a special dividend in 2016.

The decrease in cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2015 compared to fiscal 2013 (11-month)2014 was primarily due to increaseddecreased borrowing increasedand decreased proceeds from the issuance of common stock, primarily from the exercise of employee stock options, and the lack of share repurchases in fiscal 2014 (12-month).

The decrease in cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2013 (11-month) compared to fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) was primarily due to the stock repurchase program being suspended in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and the absence of the Mobile buy-out payment which was incurred in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast), partially offset by the inflow of cash from the issuance of the $1.0 billion of long-term debt securities in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast).options.

Sources of Liquidity

Funds generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, andshort-term investments, our credit facilities, and other debt arrangements and trade payables are our most significant sources of liquidity. We believe our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to sustain operations and to finance anticipated capital investments and strategic initiatives. However, in the event our liquidity is insufficient, we may be required to limit our spending. There can be no assurance that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our existing credit facilities or obtain additional financing, if necessary, on favorable terms.

We haveOn June 30, 2014, we entered into a $500 million 364-day senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "364-Day Facility Agreement") and a $1.5new $1.25 billion five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Five-Year Facility Agreement") (collectively the "Agreements") with a syndicate of banks. The 364-Day Facility Agreementbanks that expires in June 2014 and the2019. The Five-Year Facility Agreement expiresreplaced the previous $1.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, which was originally scheduled to expire in October 2016.2016, but was terminated on June 30, 2014. At March 24, 2014,January 31, 2015, and January 30, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Agreements.

We have $162 million available (based on the exchange rates in effect as of the end of fiscal 2014 (12-month)) under unsecured revolving demand facilities related to our International segment operations. There were no borrowings outstanding at February 1, 2014.Five-Year Facility Agreement. Refer to Note 7,5, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities.

Our ability to access our revolving credit facilities,facility under the Agreements,Five-Year Facility Agreement is subject to our compliance with the terms and conditions of such facilities,the facility, including financial covenants. The financial covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios. At February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all such financial covenants. If an event of default were to occur with respect to any of our other debt, it would likely constitute an event of default under our facilities as well.


43


An interest coverage ratio represents the ratio of pre-tax earnings before fixed charges (interest expense and the interest portion of rent expense) to fixed charges. Our interest coverage ratio, calculated as reported in Exhibit No. 12.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, was 3.865.16 and 0.455.08 in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 and 2013 (11-month),fiscal 2015, respectively.
 
Our credit ratings and outlooks at March 24, 2014,21, 2016, are summarized below. On September 4, 2013, Fitch Ratings Ltd.August 15, 2015, Standard & Poor's Rating Services ("Fitch"Standard & Poor's") reaffirmedupgraded its BB- long-term credit rating and changed its outlook from NegativeBB to Stable.BB+ with a Stable outlook. On August 21, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (“Standard & Poor's") reaffirmed its BB long-term credit rating and changed its outlook from Negative to Stable. On May 28, 2013,24, 2015, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") reaffirmedupgraded its Baa2 long-term credit rating and changedfrom Baa2 to Baa1 with a Stable

43


outlook. On August 26, 2015, Fitch Ratings Limited ("Fitch") upgraded its outlooklong-term credit rating from DevelopingBB to Negative.BBB- with a Stable outlook.
Rating Agency Rating Outlook
Standard & Poor's BBBB+ Stable
Moody's Baa2Baa1 NegativeStable
Fitch BB-BBB- Stable
 
Credit rating agencies review their ratings periodically and, therefore, the credit rating assigned to us by each agency may be subject to revision at any time. Accordingly, we are not able to predict whether our current credit ratings will remain as disclosed above. Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the retail and consumer electronics industries, our financial position and changes in our business strategy. If further changes in our credit ratings were to occur, they could impact, among other things, interest costs for certain of our credit facilities, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets, vendor financing terms and future new-store leasing costs.
 
Restricted Cash
 
Our liquidity is also affected by restricted cash balances that are pledged as collateral or restricted to use for vendor payables, general liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance, and customer warranty and insurance programs.insurance. Restricted cash and cash equivalents related to our continuing operations, which are included in other current assets, were $308remained flat at $185 million and $363$184 million at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively. The decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the sale of our 50% interest in Best Buy Europe.
 
Capital Expenditures
 
Our capital expenditures typically include investments in newour stores, store remodeling, store relocations and expansions, distribution facilitiescapabilities and information technology enhancements.enhancements (including e-commerce). During fiscal 2014 (12-month),2016, we invested $487$649 million (excluding Best Buy Europe) in property and equipment, primarily related to upgrading our information technology systems and capabilities, and store-related projects.
 
The following table presents our capital expenditures for each of the past three fiscal years and fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 2012 2012
    (recast)  2016 2015 2014
New stores$9
 $52
 $107
 $107
$5
 $3
 $8
Store-related projects(1)
115
 149
 158
 165
241
 177
 110
Information technology(2)
353
 331
 274
 319
E-commerce and information technology390
 355
 350
Other10
 51
 9
 11
13
 16
 9
Total capital expenditures(3)(4)
$487
 $583
 $548
 $602
Total capital expenditures(2)(3)
$649
 $551
 $477
(1)Includes store remodels and various merchandising projects.
(2)Includes e-commerce projects.Excludes $10 million and $70 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to Five Star and Best Buy Europe.
(3)Excludes $60 million, $122 million, $161 million and $164 million for fiscal 2014 (12-month), 2013 (11-month), 2012 (11-month recast) and 2012 (12-month), respectively, related to Best Buy Europe, which was sold on June 26, 2013.
(4)
Total capital expenditures exclude non-cash capital expenditures of $13$92 million,, $29 $14 million, $13 and $13 million and $18 million for fiscal 2014 (12-month), 2013 (11-month), 2012 (11-month recast)2016, fiscal 2015 and 2012 (12-month),2014, respectively. Non-cash capital expenditures are comprised of capitalized leases, as well as additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable.

44


Refer to Note 13, Contingencies and Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our significant commitments forIn fiscal 2017, we estimate cash capital expenditures at February 1, 2014.of approximately $650 million to $700 million, with the focus on retail store, e-commerce and information technology projects.

Debt and Capital

We have $350 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2016 (the “2016 Notes”), $500 million principal amount of notes due August 2,1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and $650 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2021 (the “2021 Notes”). Refer to Note 7,5, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our 2016 Notes, 2018 Notes and 2021 Notes. In March 2016, we paid the balance of the 2016 Notes using existing cash resources.

Other


44


At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, we had $95$178 million and $122$69 million, respectively, outstanding under financing lease obligations. The increase in financing lease obligations was primarily due to renewals on existing leases.

Share Repurchases and Dividends

From time to time, weWe repurchase our common stock in the open market pursuant to programs approved by our Board. We may repurchase our common stock for a variety of reasons, such as acquiring shares to offset dilution related to equity-based incentives, including stock options and our employee stock purchase plan, and optimizing our capital structure. We consider several factors in determining whether to make share repurchases including, among other things, our cash needs, the availability of funding, our future business plans and the market price of our stock. If we decide to make future share repurchases, we expect that cash provided by future operating activities, as well as available cash and cash equivalents, will be the sources of funding for our share repurchases.

We have a $5.0 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by our Board in June 2011. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 share repurchase program.

At the end of fiscal 2015, $4.0 billion under this program was available for share repurchases. In fiscal 20142016 (12-month), we did not repurchase or retire any shares. We repurchased and retired 6.332.8 million shares at a cost of $1.0 billion, which included the use of an accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") contract. Refer to Note 7, $122 millionShareholders' Equity, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in fiscalItem 8, 2013Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (11-month). In fiscal 2012 (12-month), we repurchased and retired 54.6 million shares at a cost of $1.5 billion.this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the ASR. At the end of fiscal 20142016 (12-month), $4.0$3.0 billion of the $5.0 billion share repurchase program authorized by our Board in June 2011 was available for future share repurchases. Repurchased shares have been retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares.

In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter. The payment of cash dividends is subject to customary legal and contractual restrictions. During fiscal 2014 (12-month),2016, we made four cash dividend payments totaling $0.68$1.43 per share, or $233$499 million in the aggregate. During fiscal 2015, we made four cash dividend payments totaling $0.72 per share, or $251 million in the aggregate.

On February 25, 2016, we announced a plan to return capital to shareholders. The plan includes a special dividend of $0.45 per share, or approximately $145 million, and a 22% increase in our regular quarterly dividend to $0.28 per share. We plan to continue share repurchases under the June 2011 program, with the intent to repurchase $1.0 billion in shares over the next two years.

Other Financial Measures

Our current ratio, calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.4 as of January 30, 2016, compared to 1.5 at the end of fiscal 2015. The lower current ratio in fiscal 2016 was driven by an increase in current liabilities due to our 2016 Notes being due in fiscal 2017 and a decrease in current assets due to a lower cash balance.

Our debt to earnings ratio was 2.42.1 as of February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, compared to (6.3)1.3 as of February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, due primarily to a decrease in net earnings from continuing operations in fiscal 2016 compared to the same period in the 12 months ended February 1, 2014, compared to a net loss in the comparable period ended February 2, 2013.prior year. Our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio, which includes capitalized operating lease obligations in its calculation, was 3.32.6 and 2.92.8 as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively. The ratio increased as a decrease in EBITDARthe ratio was only partially offset bydue to a decrease in capitalized operating lease obligations.obligations and an increase in EBITDAR.

Our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, the most directly comparable ratio determined in accordance with GAAP. We have included this information in our MD&A as we view the adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio as an important indicator of our creditworthiness. Furthermore, we believe that our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is important for understanding our financial position and provides meaningful additional information about our ability to service our long-term debt and other fixed obligations and to fund our future growth. We also believe our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is relevant because it enables investors to compare our indebtedness to that of retailers who own, rather than lease, their stores. Our decision to own or lease real estate is based on an assessment of our financial liquidity, our capital structure, our desire to own or to lease the location, the owner’s desire to own or to lease the location, and the alternative that results in the highest return to our shareholders.
 

45


Our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is calculated as follows:

45


Adjusted debt to EBITDAR =Adjusted debt 
EBITDAR 
 
The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is our debt to net earnings ratio, which excludes capitalized operating lease obligations from debt in the numerator of the calculation and does not adjust net earnings in the denominator of the calculation.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our debt to net earnings ratio to our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio for continuing operations ($ in millions):
2014(1)
 
2013(1)
2016(1)
 
2015(1)
Debt (including current portion)(2)
$1,657
 $1,694
$1,734
 $1,613
Capitalized operating lease obligations (8 times rental expense)(3)(2)
7,484
 7,664
6,266
 6,653
Adjusted debt$9,141
 $9,358
$8,000
 $8,266
      
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations including noncontrolling interests(4)
$689
 $(270)
Goodwill impairment
 822
Net earnings from continuing operations$807
 $1,246
Interest expense, net53
 90
65
 63
Income tax expense398
 349
503
 141
Depreciation and amortization expense(5)
692
 1,235
Depreciation and amortization expense(3)
656
 689
Rental expense935
 958
783
 832
Restructuring charges and other(4)
263
 
EBITDAR$2,767
 $3,184
$3,077
 $2,971
      
Debt to net earnings ratio2.4
 (6.3)2.1
 1.3
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio3.3
 2.9
2.6
 2.8
(1)Debt is reflected as of the balance sheet dates for each of the respective fiscal periods, while rental expense and the other components of EBITDAR represent activity for the 12 months ended February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013.January 31, 2015.
(2)
Excludes debt related to our Best Buy Europe operations. As described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, we sold our interest in Best Buy Europe on June 26, 2013.
(3)The multiple of eight times annual rental expense in the calculation of our capitalized operating lease obligations is the multiple used for the retail sector by one of the nationally recognized credit rating agencies that rate our creditworthiness, and we consider it to be an appropriate multiple for our lease portfolio.
(4)We utilize net earnings including noncontrolling interests within our calculation; as such, net earnings and related cash flows attributable to noncontrolling interests are available to service our debt and operating lease commitments.
(5)(3)Depreciation and amortization expense includes impairments of fixed assets, investments and intangible assets (including impairments associated with our fiscal restructuring activities).
(4)Includes the impact of restructuring charges, non-restructuring asset impairments and excludes LCD-related legal settlements that occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2014.CRT litigation settlements.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Other than operating leases, we do not have any off-balance-sheet financing. A summary of our operating lease obligations by fiscal year is included in the "Contractual Obligations" table below. Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Item 2, Properties, and Note 9,8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


46


The following table presents information regarding our contractual obligations by fiscal year ($ in millions):
   Payments Due by Period   Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations Total 
Less Than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More Than
5 Years
 Total 
Less Than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More Than
5 Years
Long-term debt obligations(1) $1,499
 $
 $350
 $500
 $649
 $1,518
 $350
 $513
 $
 $655
Capital lease obligations 63
 23
 23
 4
 13
 46
 14
 15
 5
 12
Financing lease obligations 95
 22
 37
 21
 15
 212
 42
 64
 40
 66
Interest payments 428
 86
 151
 113
 78
 242
 59
 107
 76
 
Operating lease obligations(1)(2)
 5,033
 1,027
 1,738
 1,152
 1,116
 3,363
 813
 1,280
 749
 521
Purchase obligations(2)(3)
 2,273
 1,416
 659
 125
 73
 2,033
 1,944
 73
 16
 
Unrecognized tax benefits(3)(4)
 370
  
  
  
  
 469
  
  
  
  
Deferred compensation(4)(5)
 54
  
  
  
  
 34
  
  
  
  
Total $9,815
 $2,574
 $2,958
 $1,915
 $1,944
 $7,917
 $3,222
 $2,052
 $886
 $1,254
Note: For additional information refer to Note 7,5, Debt; Note 9,8, Leases; Note 11,10, Income Taxes; and Note 13,12, Contingencies and Commitments, inof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1)
Represents principal amounts only and excludes interest rate swap valuation adjustments.
(2)Operating lease obligations do not include payments to landlords covering real estate taxes and common area maintenance. These charges, if included, would increase total operating lease obligations by $1.5$1.1 billion at February 1, 2014.January 30, 2016.
(2)(3)Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations do not include agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Additionally, although they are not legally binding agreements, we included open purchase orders in the table above. Substantially all open purchase orders are fulfilled within 30 days.
(3)(4)Unrecognized tax benefits relate to uncertain tax positions recorded under accounting guidance that we adopted on March 4, 2007.positions. As we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time, the related balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.
(4)(5)
Included in Long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, was a $54$34 million obligation for deferred compensation. As the specific payment dates for the deferred compensation are unknown, the related balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.

Additionally, we have $2.2$1.25 billion in undrawn capacity on our credit facilities at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, which if drawn upon, would be included as short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In connection with theThe preparation of our financial statements we are requiredrequires us to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and theyresults. These estimates require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the needbecause they relate to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board.

Except where noted, we have not made any material changes to the accounting methodologies for the areas described below.

Inventory

We value our inventory at the lower of cost or market through the establishment of markdown and inventory loss adjustments. Markdown adjustments reflect the excess of the cost over the amountnet proceeds we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or other

47


disposal of the inventory and establish a new cost basis. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result in the reversal of previously recorded markdowns or an increase in that newly established cost basis. Markdown adjustments involve uncertainty because the calculations require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding inventory aging,factors such as forecast consumer demand, the promotional environment and technological obsolescence.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our markdowns.markdown adjustments. However, if estimates regarding consumer demandactual outcomes are inaccurate or changes in technology affect demand for certain products in an unforeseen manner,different than we anticipated, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our markdown reserve percentageadjustment at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, would have affected net earnings by approximately $7$9 million in fiscal 2014.2016.

Inventory loss adjustments reflect anticipated physicalVendor Allowances

We receive allowances from certain vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements. We treat a substantial majority of these allowances as an offset to the cost of the product or services provided. Sell-through allowances are collected when inventory losses (e.g., theft)is sold to customers and recognized as a reduction in cost of sales at that have occurred sincetime. Certain other types of funding, most notably receipt-based allowances, are collected when we take receipt of inventory and deferred as a reduction of inventory until inventory is sold. The estimation of the last physical inventory based on a percentagedeferral for these types of net sales. Inventory loss adjustments involve uncertainty because the calculations require management to make assumptionsfunding is complex and to apply judgment regarding a numberrequires detailed analysis of factors including historical results, expectationssuch as product and vendor mix, inventory turn and a large range of future inventory loss and current inventory loss trends. Our inventory loss estimate is verified by ongoing physical inventory counts. Historically, our annual physical inventory count results have shown our estimates to be reliable.diverse allowance programs.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our inventory loss adjustment. However, if our estimates regarding physical inventory losses are inaccurate, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our physical inventory loss percentage at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $6 million in fiscal 2014.

Vendor Allowances

We receive allowances from certain vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements intended to offset our costs of promoting and selling merchandise inventories. Receipt-based funds represent one form of our vendor allowances. Receipt-based funds are generally determined at an agreed percentage of purchases and are initially deferred and recorded as a reduction of merchandise inventories. The deferred amounts are then included as a reduction of cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. We estimate the amount of vendor funding to be deferred and recorded as a reduction of inventory at the end of each period, based on detailed analysis of inventory turns and applicable vendor funding rates.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our vendor funding deferral. However, if actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and estimates used, we may be exposed to additional adjustments that could materially, either positively or negatively, impact our gross profit rate and inventory. A 10% difference in our vendor funding deferral at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, would have affected net earnings by approximately $17$21 million in fiscal 2014.2016.

Long-Lived AssetsWe also receive vendor allowances for achieving certain volume targets. These vendor allowances are accrued as earned over the incentive period, based on estimates of purchases. Amounts accrued throughout the program year could require adjustment if actual purchase volumes differ from projected purchase volumes, especially in the case of programs that provide for increased funding when graduated volume tiers are met. We believe that our estimate of vendor allowances earned based on expected volume of purchases over the incentive period is an accurate reflection of the ultimate allowances to be received from our vendors. Since most volume-based programs apply to a calendar year or our fiscal year, the amount of judgment required as of any fiscal year end is minimal.

Long-lived assets other than goodwillProperty and indefinite-lived intangibleEquipment Impairments

Property and equipment assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

When evaluating long-livedproperty and equipment assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset'sits estimated undiscounted future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges).flows. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset'sits estimated fair value, which may beis typically based on estimated discounted future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis will beis depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.

When reviewing long-livedproperty and equipment assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For long-lived assets deployed at store locations, we review for impairment at the individual store level. These reviews involve comparing the carrying value of all land, buildings, leasehold improvements, fixturesproperty and equipment located at each store to the net cash flow projections for each store. In addition, we conduct separate impairment reviews at other levels as appropriate. For example, a shared asset such as a distribution center would be evaluated by reference to the aggregate assets liabilities and projected cash flows of all areas of the businesses utilizing those shared assets.


48


Our impairment loss calculations include uncertainty because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment in order to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including estimating cash flows and useful lives of the assets and selecting thea discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to lossesimpairments that could be material. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-livedproperty and equipment asset impairment losses.

Goodwill


We evaluate goodwill
48


Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment annually in the fiscal fourth quarter andor whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate theirthe carrying value may not be recoverable.

We test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below the operating segment level. Our detailed impairment testing involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of the reporting unit.unit and is based on discounted cash flows or relative market-based approaches. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, then it is concluded that no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is required to measure possible goodwill impairment loss. The second step includes hypothetically valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying value.

Our detailed impairment analysis involves the use of discounted cash flow models. Significant management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes on each reporting unit. Critical assumptions include projected comparable store sales growth, store count, gross profit rates, SG&A rates, working capital fluctuations, capital expenditures, discount rates and terminal growth rates. We determine discount rates separately for each reporting unit using the capital asset pricing model. We also use comparable market earnings multiple data and our company's market capitalization to corroborate our reporting unit valuations.

The carrying value of goodwill at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, was $425 million, which all related entirely to our U.S. reporting unit.Domestic segment. In fiscal 2014,2016, we determined that the excess of fair value over carrying value was substantial. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to test for impairment losses on goodwill. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.

Tax Contingencies

Our income tax returns, like those of most companies, are periodically audited by domestic and foreign tax authorities. These audits include questions regarding our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of income and deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. At any one time, multiplemany tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we may record a liability for such exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a liability, is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provisions in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available.

Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions.

Our effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law, the tax jurisdiction of new stores or business ventures, the level of earnings and the results of tax audits.

Although we believe that the judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

To the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our established liability, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement generally would require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our effective income tax

49


rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement may reduce our effective income tax rate and would be recognized in the period of resolution.

Revenue Recognition

The following accounting estimates relating to revenue recognition contain uncertainty because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding the effects of future events.

Returns – We recognize revenue, net of estimated returns, at the time the customer takes possession of merchandise or receives services. We estimate the liability for sales returns with a corresponding reduction to revenue and cost of sales based on historical return data. We believe that our estimate for sales returns, which represents the estimated gross margin impact of returns, is a reasonable reflection of future returns and financial impacts. However, if our estimates are significantly below or above the actual return amounts, our reported revenue and cost of sales could be impacted. A 10% difference in our returns reserve at January 30, 2016, would have affected net earnings by approximately $2 million in fiscal 2016.


49


Gift Card Breakage – We sell gift cards to customers in our retail stores, through our websites and through selectedselect third parties. A liability is initially established for the value of the gift card.card when sold. We recognize revenue from gift cards when: (i)when the card is redeemed by the customer, or (ii)customer. For unredeemed gift cards we recognize breakage when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is deemed remote (“and we determine that we do not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift card breakage”).cards to a relevant jurisdiction. We determine our gift cardthe breakage rate based uponon historical redemption patterns, which show that after 24 months, we can determinereasonably estimate breakage. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the portion of the liability for which redemption is remote.future estimates or assumptions we use to record breakage. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.

Customer Loyalty ProgramsWe have customer loyalty programs which allow members to earn points for each purchase completed or when using our co-branded credit cards in the U.S. and Canada.cards. Points earned enable members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases. The value of points earned by our loyalty program members is included in accrued liabilities and recorded as a reduction in revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the value of points that are projected to be redeemed.

Our estimate of the amount and timing of redemptions of gift cards and certificates is based primarily on historical transaction experience, anddata. A 10% difference in our estimate of the services consumed under service contracts is based on historical usage rates. customer loyalty point liability at January 30, 2016, would have affected net earnings by approximately $13 million in fiscal 2016.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to recognizeof our revenue for our gift cards, customer loyalty programs or service contracts.recognition critical accounting estimates. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

A 10% change in our gift card breakage rate at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $25 million in fiscal 2014.New Accounting Pronouncements

A 10% changeFor a description of new applicable accounting pronouncements, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in our customer loyalty program redemption rate at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $12 million in fiscal 2014.Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We also sell service contracts for technical support, maintenance and other programs. Revenue on service contracts is deferred at the time of purchase and recognized either (i) ratably over the term of the contract, or (ii) under a utilization model based on the percentage of services consumed during the contract term compared with the total estimated services to be provided over the entire contract.

A 10% change in our deferred revenue balance related to service contracts at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $9 million in fiscal 2014.

Costs Associated with Vacant Leased Property

From time-to-time we vacate stores and other locations prior to the expiration of the related lease. For vacated locations with remaining lease commitments, we record an expense for the difference between the present value of our future lease payments and related costs (e.g., real estate taxes and common area maintenance) from the date we cease to use the location through the end of the remaining lease term, net of expected future sublease rental income.

Our estimate of future cash flows is based on historical experience; our analysis of the specific real estate market, including input from independent real estate firms; and economic conditions. Cash flows are discounted using a risk-free interest rate that coincides with the remaining lease term.

The liability recorded for location closures involves uncertainty because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the duration of future vacancy periods, the amount and timing of future settlement payments and the amount and timing of potential sublease rental income. When making these assumptions, management considers a number of factors, including historical experience, the location and condition of the property, the terms of the underlying lease, the specific marketplace demand and general economic conditions.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our closed location liability. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

50


A 10% change in our closed location liability at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $8 million in fiscal 2014.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have a stock-based compensation plan, which includes non-qualified stock options, nonvested share awards, and an employee stock purchase plan. We determine the fair value of our non-qualified stock option awards using option-pricing models. We determine the fair value of nonvested share awards with market conditions using Monte-Carlo simulation. We determine the fair value of nonvested share awards that vest based upon performance or time conditions at the closing market price of our stock, reduced by the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period where the recipient has no dividend rights. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. Management's key assumptions are developed with input from independent third-party valuation advisors.

Valuation techniques used require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, expected dividend yield, future employee turnover rates and future employee stock option exercise behaviors and correlations between our returns and peer company returns. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Estimation of awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment for the amounts that will be forfeited due to failure to fulfill service conditions or to achieve company or personal performance goals. To the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. Changes in estimates can materially affect compensation expense within individual periods.

Estimates and assumptions are based upon information currently available, including historical experience and current business and economic conditions. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in stock-based compensation expense that could be material. A 10% change in our stock-based compensation expense for the year ended February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $6 million in fiscal 2014.

Self-Insured Liabilities

We are self-insured for certain losses related to health, workers' compensation and general liability claims, as well as customer warranty and insurance programs, although we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to these claims. When estimating our self-insured liabilities, we consider a number of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries. Our self-insured liabilities involve uncertainty because management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not reported at the balance sheet date.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our self-insured liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% change in our self-insured liabilities at February 1, 2014, would have affected net earnings by approximately $5 million in fiscal 2014.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to certain market risks.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in short-term market interest rates and these changes in rates will impact our net interest expense. Our cash and short-term investments generate interest income that will vary based on changes in short-term interest rates, and we have also swapped a portion of our fixed-rate debt to floating-rate such that the interest expense on this debt will vary with short-term interest rates. Refer to Note 5, Debt,and Note 6, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our interest rate swaps.

As of January 30, 2016, we had $3.3 billion of cash and short-term investments and $750 million of debt that has been swapped to floating rate. Therefore, we had net cash and short-term investments of $2.6 billion generating income which is exposed to interest rate changes. As of January 30, 2016, a 50 basis point increase in short-term interest rates would lead to an estimated $13 million reduction in net interest expense, and conversely a 50 basis point decrease in short-term interest rates would lead to an estimated $13 million increase in net interest expense.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We have market risk arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our International segment operations. On a limited basis, we utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to manage foreign currency exposure to certain forecast inventory purchases, and recognized receivable and payable balances.balances and our investment in our Canadian operations. Our primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of net earnings and cash flows, as well as of the net asset value associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our foreign currency risk management strategy includes both hedging instruments and derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments, which generally have terms of up to 12 months. The aggregate notional amount relatedRefer to our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding atNote 6, February 1, 2014Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and February 2, 2013Supplementary Data, was $157 million and $173 million, respectively. The fair value recordedof this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our Consolidated Balance Sheets related to our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013, was $(3) million and $1 million, respectively. The amount recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings related to all contracts settled and outstanding was a gain of $4 million in fiscal 2014 (12-month) and a gain of $1 million in fiscal 2013 (11-month).these instruments.

51


The strength of the U.S. dollar compared to the Canadian dollar sinceand Mexican peso compared to the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month)prior-year period had a negative overall impact on our revenue and earnings as the Canadian dollarthese currencies translated into fewer U.S. dollars. The negative impact on revenue from the Canadian dollar depreciation was partially offset by a positive impact from the appreciation of the Chinese yuan and Mexican peso. We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a net unfavorable impact on our revenue in fiscal 2014 (12-month)2016 of approximately $159$534 million and a net unfavorablefavorable impact on earnings of $6 million.$20 million. In fiscal 2013 (11-month),2015, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a favorablean unfavorable impact on our revenue of approximately $28$308 million and an unfavorable impact on earnings of $16 million.


$4 million.

5251


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Management's Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related financial information. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and necessarily include certain amounts that are based on estimates and informed judgments. Our management also prepared the related financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, which conducted its audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.)(United States). The independent registered public accounting firm's responsibility is to express an opinion as to the fairness with which such financial statements present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets;

(2)Provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and Board; and

(3)Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992)(2013). Based on our assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016. During our assessment, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an unqualified attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016.

 
Hubert Joly
PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized and principal executive officer)
 
Sharon L. McCollam
Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized and principal financial officer)

5352


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.:
Richfield, Minnesota

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the 12 monthsthree years in the period ended February 1, 2014, the 11 months ended February 2, 2013, and the 12 months ended March 3, 2012.January 30, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the 12 monthsthree years ended February 1, 2014, the 11 months ended February 2, 2013, and the 12 months ended March 3, 2012,January 30, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, during fiscal 2014 the Company completed the sale of their 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe and the sale of mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. The losses from each sale and the results of each business prior to their respective sale are included in the loss from discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective for fiscal year 2013, the Company changed its fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January. As a result of this change, fiscal year 2013 was an 11-month transition period beginning March 4, 2012 through February 2, 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 28, 2014,23, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 2014
23, 2016


5453



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.:
Richfield, Minnesota

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated-Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, of the Company and our report dated March 28, 2014,23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and includes explanatory paragraphs concerning the Company’s sale of Best Buy Europe and mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. and the Company’s change in fiscal year end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January, effective for fiscal year 2013.schedule.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 2014
23, 2016


5554


Consolidated Balance Sheets
$ in millions, except per share and share amounts
 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Assets        
Current Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents $2,678
 $1,826
 $1,976
 $2,432
Short-term investments 223
 
 1,305
 1,456
Receivables, net 1,308
 2,704
 1,162
 1,280
Merchandise inventories 5,376
 6,571
 5,051
 5,174
Other current assets 900
 946
 392
 449
Current assets held for sale 
 681
Total current assets 10,485
 12,047
 9,886
 11,472
Property and Equipment        
Land and buildings 758
 756
 613
 611
Leasehold improvements 2,182
 2,386
 2,220
 2,201
Fixtures and equipment 4,515
 5,120
 5,002
 4,729
Property under capital lease 120
 113
Property under capital and financing leases 272
 119
 7,575
 8,375
 8,107
 7,660
Less accumulated depreciation 4,977
 5,105
 5,761
 5,365
Net property and equipment 2,598
 3,270
 2,346
 2,295
Goodwill 425
 528
 425
 425
Intangibles, Net 101
 334
 18
 57
Other Assets 404
 608
 813
 829
Non-current assets held for sale 31
 167
Total Assets $14,013
 $16,787
 $13,519
 $15,245
        
Liabilities and Equity        
Current Liabilities        
Accounts payable $5,122
 $6,951
 $4,450
 $5,030
Unredeemed gift card liabilities 406
 428
 409
 411
Deferred revenue 399
 451
 357
 326
Accrued compensation and related expenses 444
 520
 384
 372
Accrued liabilities 873
 1,188
 802
 782
Accrued income taxes 147
 129
 128
 230
Short-term debt 
 596
Current portion of long-term debt 45
 547
 395
 41
Current liabilities held for sale 
 585
Total current liabilities 7,436
 10,810
 6,925
 7,777
Long-Term Liabilities 976
 1,109
 877
 881
Long-Term Debt 1,612
 1,153
 1,339
 1,572
Contingencies and Commitments (Note 13) 
 
Contingencies and Commitments (Note 12) 
 
Long-Term Liabilities held for sale 
 15
Equity        
Best Buy Co., Inc. Shareholders' Equity        
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized — 400,000 shares; Issued and outstanding — none 
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized — 1.0 billion shares; Issued and outstanding — 346,751,000 and 338,276,000 shares, respectively 35
 34
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized — 1.0 billion shares; Issued and outstanding — 323,779,000 and 351,468,000 shares, respectively 32
 35
Prepaid share repurchase (55) 
Additional paid-in capital 300
 54
 
 437
Retained earnings 3,159
 2,861
 4,130
 4,141
Accumulated other comprehensive income 492
 112
 271
 382
Total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders' equity 3,986
 3,061
 4,378
 4,995
Noncontrolling interests 3
 654
 
 5
Total equity 3,989
 3,715
 4,378
 5,000
Total Liabilities and Equity $14,013
 $16,787
 $13,519
 $15,245
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5655


Consolidated Statements of Earnings
$ in millions, except per share amounts
 12 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012 March 3, 2012 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
     (Unaudited recast)  
Revenue $42,410
 $39,827
 $41,311
 $45,457
 $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Cost of goods sold 32,720
 30,528
 31,384
 34,454
 30,334
 31,292
 31,212
Restructuring charges — cost of goods sold 
 1
 19
 19
 3
 
 
Gross profit 9,690
 9,298
 9,908
 10,984
 9,191
 9,047
 9,399
Selling, general and administrative expenses 8,391
 8,181
 7,986
 8,755
 7,618
 7,592
 8,106
Restructuring charges 159
 414
 24
 29
 198
 5
 149
Goodwill impairments 
 822
 
 
Operating income (loss) 1,140
 (119) 1,898
 2,200
Operating income 1,375
 1,450
 1,144
Other income (expense)              
Gain on sale of investments 20
 
 55
 55
 2
 13
 20
Investment income and other 27
 20
 23
 22
 13
 14
 19
Interest expense (100) (99) (101) (111) (80) (90) (100)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in income (loss) of affiliates 1,087
 (198) 1,875
 2,166
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense 1,310
 1,387
 1,083
Income tax expense 398
 269
 658
 742
 503
 141
 388
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations 689
 (467) 1,217
 1,424
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 4), net of tax of $42, $37, $119 and $122 (166) 47
 (1,394) (1,402)
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 523
 (420) (177) 22
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (2) (2) (3) (3)
Net earnings from continuing operations 807
 1,246
 695
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 2), net of tax benefit (expense) of $(1), $0 and $31 90
 (11) (172)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests 897
 1,235
 523
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 11
 (19) (1,245) (1,250) 
 (2) 9
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $532
 $(441) $(1,425) $(1,231)
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $897
 $1,233
 $532
              
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholdersBasic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders          
Continuing operations $2.01
 $(1.38) $3.26
 $3.88
 $2.33
 $3.57
 $2.03
Discontinued operations (0.45) 0.08
 (7.09) (7.24) 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47)
Basic earnings (loss) per share $1.56
 $(1.30) $(3.83) $(3.36)
Basic earnings per share $2.59
 $3.53
 $1.56
              
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholdersDiluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders          
Continuing operations $1.98
 $(1.38) $3.19
 $3.81
 $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
Discontinued operations (0.45) 0.08
 (6.91) (7.08) 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $1.53
 $(1.30) $(3.72) $(3.27)
Diluted earnings per share $2.56
 $3.49
 $1.53
              
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions)              
Basic 342.1
 338.6
 372.5
 366.3
 346.5
 349.5
 342.1
Diluted 347.6
 338.6
 382.0
 374.5
 350.7
 353.6
 347.6

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


5756


Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
$ in millions
 12 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests $523
 $(420) $22
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests $897
 $1,235
 $523
Foreign currency translation adjustments (147) 15
 (21) (44) (103) (147)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments 6
 2
 (26) 
 (3) 6
Reclassification of foreign currency translations adjustments into earnings due to sale of business 654
 
 
 (67) 
 654
Reclassification of (gains) losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings 2
 
 (48) 
 (4) 2
Comprehensive income (loss) including noncontrolling interests 1,038
 (403) (73)
Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests 786
 1,125
 1,038
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (126) (27) (1,241) 
 (2) (126)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $912
 $(430) $(1,314)
Comprehensive income attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $786
 $1,123
 $912

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

57


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$ in millions
Fiscal Years Ended January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Operating Activities    
  
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests $897
 $1,235
 $523
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to total cash provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation 657
 656
 701
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 
 
 15
Restructuring charges 201
 23
 259
(Gain) Loss on sale of business (99) (1) 143
Stock-based compensation 104
 87
 90
Deferred income taxes 49
 (297) (28)
Other, net 38
 8
 62
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Receivables 123
 (19) 7
Merchandise inventories 86
 (141) 597
Other assets 36
 29
 (70)
Accounts payable (536) 434
 (986)
Other liabilities (140) (164) (273)
Income taxes (94) 85
 54
Total cash provided by operating activities 1,322
 1,935
 1,094
Investing Activities      
Additions to property and equipment, net of $92, $14 and $13 of non-cash capital expenditures (649) (561) (547)
Purchases of investments (2,281) (2,804) (230)
Sales of investments 2,427
 1,580
 50
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred 103
 39
 206
Change in restricted assets (47) 29
 5
Other, net 28
 5
 (1)
Total cash used in investing activities (419) (1,712) (517)
Financing Activities      
Repurchase of common stock (1,000) 
 
Prepayment of accelerated share repurchase (55) 
 
Issuance of common stock 47
 50
 171
Dividends paid (499) (251) (233)
Repayments of debt (28) (24) (2,033)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 
 
 2,414
Other, net 20
 2
 
Total cash provided by (used in) financing activities (1,515) (223) 319
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash (38) (52) (44)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (650) (52) 852
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period, Excluding Held for Sale 2,432
 2,678
 1,826
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held for Sale at Beginning of Period 194
 
 
Cash and Cash equivalents at End of Period 1,976

2,626

2,678
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held for Sale at End of Period 
 (194) 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period, Excluding Held for Sale $1,976

$2,432

$2,678
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information      
Income taxes paid $550
 $355
 $332
Interest paid 77
 81
 82

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58


Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsChanges in Shareholders' Equity
$ and shares in millions
  12 Months Ended 11 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 January 28, 2012 March 3, 2012
      (Unaudited recast)  
Operating Activities    
    
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests $523
 $(420) $(177) $22
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to total cash provided by operating activities:       
  
Depreciation 701
 794
 811
 897
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 15
 38
 42
 48
Restructuring charges 259
 449
 280
 287
Goodwill impairments 
 822
 1,207
 1,207
Loss on sale of business 143
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation 90
 107
 110
 120
Realized gain on sale of investment 
 
 (55) (55)
Deferred income taxes (28) (19) 110
 28
Other, net 62
 41
 20
 26
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets and liabilities acquired or sold:        
Receivables 7
 (551) (342) 41
Merchandise inventories 597
 (912) (1,067) 120
Other assets (70) (65) 29
 (24)
Accounts payable (986) 1,735
 2,095
 574
Other liabilities (273) (339) 82
 (23)
Income taxes 54
 (226) (48) 25
Total cash provided by operating activities 1,094
 1,454
 3,097
 3,293
Investing Activities        
Additions to property and equipment, net of $13, $29, $13 and $18 non-cash capital expenditures (547) (705) (709) (766)
Purchases of investments (230) (13) (111) (112)
Sales of investments 50
 69
 290
 290
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired 
 (31) (174) (174)
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred 206
 25
 1
 
Change in restricted assets 5
 101
 58
 40
Other, net (1) 16
 (2) (2)
Total cash used in investing activities (517) (538) (647) (724)
Financing Activities        
Repurchase of common stock 
 (122) (1,368) (1,500)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan and for the exercise of stock options 171
 25
 66
 67
Dividends paid (233) (224) (228) (228)
Repayments of debt (2,033) (1,614) (3,192) (3,412)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 2,414
 1,741
 3,911
 3,921
Payment to noncontrolling interest (Note 3) 
 
 (1,303) (1,303)
Other, net 
 (17) (27) (23)
Total cash provided by (used in) financing activities 319
 (211) (2,141) (2,478)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash (44) (4) (6) 5
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 852
 701
 303
 96
Adjustment for Fiscal Year-end Change (Note 2) 
 (74) (5) 
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents After Adjustment 852
 627
 298
 96
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 1,826
 1,199
 1,103
 1,103
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $2,678
 $1,826
 $1,401
 $1,199
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information        
Income taxes paid $332
 $478
 $476
 $568
Interest paid 82
 106
 86
 89
 
Common
Shares

 
Common
Stock

 Prepaid Share Repurchase
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 
Retained
Earnings

 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 
Total Best 
Buy Co., Inc.
Shareholders'
Equity

 
Non
controlling
Interests

 
Total
Equity

Balances at February 2, 2013338
 34
 
 54
 2,861
 112
 3,061
 654
 3,715
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 
 532
 
 532
 (9) 523
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (136) (136) (11) (147)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 
 7
 7
 (1) 6
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 508
 508
 146
 654
Reclassification of losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
 1
 2
Sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (776) (776)
Dividend distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Tax loss from stock options canceled or exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 (22) 
 
 (22) 
 (22)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan1
 
 
 13
 
 
 13
 
 13
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 97
 
 
 97
 
 97
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised8
 1
 
 158
 
 
 159
 
 159
Common stock dividends, $0.68 per share
 
 
 
 (234) 
 (234) 
 (234)
Balances at February 1, 2014347
 35
 
 300
 3,159
 492
 3,986
 3
 3,989
Net earnings
 
 
 
 1,233
 
 1,233
 2
 1,235
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (103) (103) 
 (103)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 
 (3) (3) 
 (3)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 (4) (4) 
 (4)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 8
 
 
 8
 
 8
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 87
 
 
 87
 
 87
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised5
 
 
 42
 
 
 42
 
 42
Common stock dividends, $0.72 per share
 
 
 
 (251) 
 (251) 
 (251)
Balances at January 31, 2015352
 35
 
 437
 4,141
 382
 4,995
 5
 5,000
Net earnings
 
 
 
 897
 
 897
 
 897
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (44) (44) 
 (44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 (67) (67) 
 (67)
Sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (5) (5)
Prepaid repurchase of common stock
 
 (55) 
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
 
 7
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 104
 
 
 104
 
 104
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised5
 
 
 40
 
 
 40
 
 40
Tax benefits from stock options exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 2
 
 
 2
 
 2
Common stock dividends, $1.43 per share
 
 
��3
 (504) 
 (501) 
 (501)
Repurchase of common stock(33) (3) 
 (593) (404) 
 (1,000) 
 (1,000)
Balances at January 30, 2016324
 $32
 $(55) $
 $4,130
 $271
 $4,378
 $
 $4,378

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

59


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
$ and shares in millions
 
Common
Shares

 
Common
Stock

 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 
Retained
Earnings

 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 
Total Best 
Buy Co., Inc.
Shareholders'
Equity

 
Non
controlling
Interests

 
Total
Equity

Balances at February 26, 2011393
 $39
 $18
 $6,372
 $173
 $6,602
 $690
 $7,292
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 (1,231) 
 (1,231) 1,253
 22
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 (9) (9) (12) (21)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 (26) (26) 
 (26)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 (48) (48) 
 (48)
Payment to noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,303) (1,303)
Dividend distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 (7) (7)
Stock options exercised1
 
 27
 
 
 27
 
 27
Tax loss from stock options canceled or exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 (2) 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan2
 
 40
 
 
 40
 
 40
Stock-based compensation
 
 120
 
 
 120
 
 120
Common stock dividends, $0.62 per share
 
 
 (228) 
 (228) 
 (228)
Repurchase of common stock(55) (5) (203) (1,292) 
 (1,500) 
 (1,500)
Balances at March 3, 2012341
 34
 
 3,621
 90
 3,745
 621
 4,366
Adjustment for fiscal year-end change (Note 2)
 
 
 (14) 11
 (3) 9
 6
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 (441) 
 (441) 21
 (420)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:              

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 9
 9
 6
 15
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 2
 2
 
 2
Dividend distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 (3) (3)
Stock options exercised2
 
 1
 
 
 1
 
 1
Tax loss from stock options canceled or exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 (44) 
 
 (44) 
 (44)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan1
 
 24
 
 
 24
 
 24
Stock-based compensation
 
 112
 
 
 112
 
 112
Common stock dividends, $0.66 per share
 
 
 (222) 
 (222) 
 (222)
Repurchase of common stock(6) 
 (39) (83) 
 (122) 
 (122)
Balances at February 2, 2013338
 34
 54
 2,861
 112
 3,061
 654
 3,715
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 532
 
 532
 (9) 523
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:              
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 (136) (136) (11) (147)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 7
 7
 (1) 6
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 508
 508
 146
 654
Reclassification of losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 1
 1
 1
 2
Sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (776) (776)
Dividend distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Tax loss from stock options canceled or exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 (22) 
 
 (22) 
 (22)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan1
 
 13
 
 
 13
 
 13
Stock-based compensation
 
 97
 
 
 97
 
 97
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised8
 1
 158
 
 
 159
 
 159
Common stock dividends, $0.68 per share
 
 
 (234) 
 (234) 
 (234)
Balances at February 1, 2014347
 $35
 $300
 $3,159
 $492
 $3,986
 $3
 $3,989
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

60


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms "Best Buy",Buy," "we," "us" and "our" in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements refers to Best Buy Co., Inc. and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries.

Discontinued Operations

On June 26, 2013, we sold our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe Distributions Limited (“("Best Buy Europe”) to Carphone Warehouse Group plc ("CPW"Europe"). On February 1, 2014, we sold mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. ("mindSHIFT") to Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc.. On February 13, 2015, we sold Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Limited ("Ricoh"Five Star"). The results of Best Buy Europe, mindSHIFT and mindSHIFT for all periods have beenFive Star are presented as discontinued operations.operations for all periods. See Note 4,2, Discontinued Operations, for further information.

Description of Business

We are a multi-national, multi-channel retailerleading provider of technology products, including mobile phones, tabletsservices and computers, large and small appliances, televisions, digital imaging, entertainmentsolutions. We offer these products and related accessories. We also offer technology services – including technical support, repair and installation – underto the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad brand.agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. We have two operating reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of store, online and call centerthe operations in all states, districts and territories of the U.S., operatingunder various brand names including Best Buy, bestbuy.com, Best Buy Mobile, Best Buy Direct, Best Buy Express, Geek Squad, Magnolia Home Theater and Pacific Kitchen and Home. The International segment is comprised of all operations in Canada and Mexico under the brand names Best Buy, bestbuy.com.ca, bestbuy.com.mx, Best Buy Mobile, Geek Squad, Magnolia Audio Video and Pacific Sales. The International segment is comprised of: (i) all Canada store, online and call center operations, operating under the brand names Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Cell Shop, Connect Pro, Future Shop and Geek Squad, (ii) all China store and call center operations, operating under the brand names Five Star andExpress, Best Buy Mobile and (iii) all Mexico store operations operating under the brand names Best Buy, Best Buy Express and Geek Squad.

In addition to our retail store operations, we also operate websites including BestBuy.com, BestBuy.ca and FutureShop.ca.

Fiscal Year

On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a change in our fiscal year-end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January, effective beginning with our fiscal year 2013. As a result of this change, our fiscal year 2013 was an 11-month transition period beginning March 4, 2012, through February 2, 2013. Concurrent with the change, we began consolidating the results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a one-month lag, compared to a two-month lag in prior years, to continue aligning the fiscal reporting periods of our international operations with statutory filing requirements. In these consolidated statements, including the notes thereto, financial results for fiscal 2013 are for an 11-month period. Corresponding results for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2012 are both for 12-month periods. In addition, our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows also include an unaudited 11-month fiscal 2012 (recast). Fiscal 2014 included 52 weeks, fiscal 2013 (11-month) included 48 weeks and fiscal 2012 included 53 weeks.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Best Buy Co., Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

In order to align our fiscal reporting periods and comply with statutory filing requirements, we consolidate the financial results of our Mexico operations, as well as our discontinued Europe China and MexicoChina operations, on a one-month lag. Due to our fiscal year-end change, this was a one-month lag in fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month) and a two-month lag in fiscal 2012. Our policy is to accelerate recording the effect of events occurring in the lag period that significantly affect our consolidated financial statements. In fiscal 2012, we recorded $82 million of restructuring charges recorded in January 2012 related to our large-format Best Buy branded store closures in the United Kingdom ("U.K.") as well as a $1.2 billion goodwill impairment charge attributable to our Best Buy Europe reporting unit. Except for these restructuring activities and the goodwill impairment in fiscal 2012, noNo significant intervening event occurred in these operations that would have materially affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or other factors had it been recorded during fiscal 20142016, 2015 or 2013 (11-month). For further information about our restructuring and the nature of the charges we recorded, refer to Note 6, Restructuring Charges. For further information about the goodwill impairment, refer to Goodwill and Intangible Assets below, as well as Note 3, Profit Share Buy-Out.2014.


61


In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we evaluated the period from February 2, 2014,January 31, 2016, through the date the financial statements were issued for material subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure. NoOther than as described in Note 5, Debt, and Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, no such events were identified for this period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Future results could be materially affected if actual results were to differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the end of January. Fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014 each included 52 weeks.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-18, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Components of an Entity. The new guidance amends the definition of a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. We adopted the new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, and the adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


60


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as a new Topic. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606. The new guidance provides a comprehensive framework for the analysis of revenue transactions and will apply to all of our revenue streams. Based on the current effective dates, the new guidance would first apply in the first quarter of our fiscal 2019. While we are still in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption on our financial statements, we do not currently expect a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The new guidance was issued to increase transparency and comparability among companies by requiring most leases be included on the balance sheet and by expanding disclosure requirements. Based on the current effective dates, the new guidance would first apply in the first quarter of our fiscal 2020. We are still in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption on our financial statements.

Changes in Accounting Principles

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we adopted the following ASUs:

The FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs in April 2015and ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements in August 2015. The new guidance aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs, with the exception of debt issuance costs related to lines of credit, with the treatment of debt discounts, so that the debt issuance costs are presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The new guidance is part of the simplification initiative and requires all deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be classified as non-current. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-17. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

The following table reconciles the balance sheet line items impacted by the adoption of these two standards for fiscal 2015:
Balance Sheet2015 Reported ASU 2015-03 & 2015-15 Adjustments ASU 2015-17 Adjustments 2015 Adjusted
Other current assets$703
 $(2) $(252) $449
Current assets held for sale684
 
 (3) 681
Other assets583
 (6) 252
 829
   Total assets$15,256
 $(8) $(3) $15,245
        
Long-term debt$1,580
 $(8) $
 $1,572
Long-term liabilities held for sale18
 
 (3) 15
   Total liabilities & equity$15,256
 $(8) $(3) $15,245

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash primarily consists of cash on hand and bank deposits. Cash equivalents consist of money market funds, treasury bills, commercial paper, corporate bonds and time deposits such as certificates of deposit with an original maturity of 3 months or less when purchased. The amounts of cash equivalents at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, were $1,705$1,208 million and $740$1,660 million,, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were 0.5% and 0.3%0.4%, respectively.

Outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit (book overdrafts) totaled $62 million and $97 million at February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013, respectively, and are reflected within accounts payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Receivables

Receivables consist principally of amounts due from mobile phone network operators for commissions earned; banks for customer credit card certainand debit card and electronic benefits transfer (EBT) transactions; and vendors for various vendor funding programs.

We establish allowances for uncollectible receivables based on historical collection trends and write-off history. Our allowances for uncollectible receivables were $104$49 million and $92$59 million at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively.

61


Merchandise Inventories

Merchandise inventories are recorded at the lower of cost, using either the average cost, or first-in first-out method, or market. In-bound freight-related costs from our vendors are included as part of the net cost of merchandise inventories. Also included in the cost of inventory are certain vendor allowances that are not a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs to promote a vendor's products. Other costs associated with acquiring, storing and transporting merchandise inventories to our retail stores are expensed as incurred and included in cost of goods sold.

Our inventory valuation reflects adjustments for anticipated physical inventory losses (e.g., theft) that have occurred since the last physical inventory. Physical inventory counts are taken on a regular basis to ensure that the inventory reported in our consolidated financial statements is properly stated.

Our inventory valuation also reflects markdowns for the excess of the cost over the amount we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or other disposal of the inventory. Markdowns establish a new cost basis for our inventory. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result in the reversal of previously recorded markdowns or an increase in the newly established cost basis.

Restricted Assets

Restricted cash totaled $185 million at January 30, 2016 and investmentsis included in debt securitiesother current assets. Restricted cash totaled $310$292 million at January 31, 2015, of which $184 million is related to continuing operations and$366 million at February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013, respectively, and are included in other current assets or otherand $108 million is included in current assets held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheet. Such balances are pledged as collateral or restricted to use for vendor payables, general liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance and insurance business regulatory reserve requirements.

Derivative Instruments

We use foreign currency forward contracts to manage the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to recognized receivable and payable balances denominated in non-functional currencies, and on certain forecast inventory

62


purchases denominated in non-functional currencies. The contracts generally have terms of up to 12 months. These derivative instruments are not designated in hedging relationships and, therefore, we record gains and losses on these contracts directly to net earnings. At February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013, the notional amount of these instruments was $157 million and $173 million, respectively. We recognized a gain of $5 million and $2 million in selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings during fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month), respectively, related to these instruments.
In conjunction with our agreement to sell our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe as described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, we entered into a deal-contingent foreign currency forward contract to hedge £455 million of the total £471 million of net proceeds. The contract was settled in cash following the completion of the sale on June 26, 2013, and we recognized a $2 million loss in gain (loss) from discontinued operations on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2014.insurance.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the period from the date the assets are placed in service to the end of the lease term, which includes optional renewal periods if they are reasonably assured. Accelerated depreciation methods are generally used for income tax purposes.

When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Repairs and maintenance costs are charged directly to expense as incurred. Major renewals or replacements that substantially extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated.

Costs associated with the acquisition or development of software for internal use are capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the software, generally from three to seven years. A subsequent addition, modification or upgrade to internal-use software is capitalized to the extent that it enhances the software's functionality or extends its useful life. Capitalized software is included in fixtures and equipment. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period incurred.

Property under capital leaseand financing leases is comprised of buildings and equipment used in our operations. The related depreciation for capital leaseand financing leases assets is included in depreciation expense. The carrying value of property under capital leaseand financing leases was $58$165 million and $70$44 million at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $62$107 million and $43$75 million,, respectively.

Estimated useful lives by major asset category are as follows:
Asset 
Life
(in years)
Buildings 25-5035
Leasehold improvements 3-25
Fixtures and equipment 3-20
Property under capital leaseand financing leases 2-20


62


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Costs Associated With Exit Activities

Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could result in an impairment review include, but are not limited to, significant underperformanceunder-performance relative to historical or planned operating results, significant changes in the manner of use or expected life of the assets, or significant changes in our business strategies. An impairment loss is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from the disposition of the asset (if any) are less than the carrying value of the asset.asset net of other liabilities. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value based on quoted market prices or otherusing valuation techniques (e.g.,such as discounted cash flow analysis).analysis.

When reviewing long-lived assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For example, long-

63


livedlong-lived assets deployed at store locations are reviewed for impairment at the individual store level, which involves comparing the carrying value of all land, buildings, leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment located at each store to the net cash flow projections for each store. In addition, we conduct separate impairment reviews at other levels as appropriate, for example, to evaluate potential impairment of assets shared by several areas of operations, such as information technology systems. Refer to Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, for further information associated with the long-lived assets impairments, including valuation techniques used, impairment charges incurred, and remaining carrying values.

The present value of costs associated with location closings,vacated properties, primarily future lease costs (net of expected sublease income), are charged to earnings when we have ceasedcease using the specific location.property. We accelerate depreciation on property and equipment we expect to retire when a decision is made to abandon a location.property.

At February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, the obligation associated with location closingsvacant properties included in accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $33$44 million and $83$26 million,, respectively, and the obligation associated with location closingsvacant properties included in long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $86$54 million and $149$43 million,, respectively. The obligation associated with location closingsvacant properties at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, included amounts associated with our restructuring activities as further described in Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges.

Leases

We conduct the majority of our retail and distribution operations from leased locations. The leases generally require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, in addition to rent. The terms of our new lease agreements for large-format stores are generally less than 10 years, although we have existing leases with terms up to 20 years. Small-format stores generally have lease terms that are half the length of large-format stores. Most of the leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses, and certain store leases require contingent rents based on factors such as specified percentages of revenue or the consumer price index.

For leases that contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rent, we recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date we take possession of the property to the end of the initial lease term. We record any difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases as part of deferred rent, in accrued liabilities or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

Cash or lease incentives received upon entering into certain store leases ("tenant allowances") are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent from the date we take possession of the property through the end of the initial lease term. We record the unamortized portion of tenant allowances as a part of deferred rent, in accrued liabilities or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

At February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, deferred rent included in accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $36$36 million and $50$31 million,, respectively, and deferred rent included in long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $232$139 million and $289$195 million,, respectively.

We also lease certain equipment under noncancelable operating and capital leases. In addition, we have financing leases for whichagreements when we are deemed the grossowner of the leased buildings, typically due to significant involvement during the construction period, and do not qualify for sales recognition under the sale-leaseback accounting guidance. We record the cost of constructing the asset is includedbuilding in property and equipment, with the related liability recorded in long-term debt. At January 30, 2016 and amounts reimbursed from the landlord are recorded asJanuary 31, 2015, we had $178 million and $69 million, respectively, outstanding under financing lease obligations. The increase in financing lease obligations was primarily due to renewals on existing leases.

63


Assets acquired under capital and financing leases are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term, including renewal periods, if reasonably assured.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. We test goodwill for impairment annually, as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter, or when indications of potential impairment exist. We monitor the existence of potential impairment indicators throughout the fiscal year. We test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level. Ourlevel and our reporting units are the components of operating segments which constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by segment management. No components were aggregated in arriving at our reporting units. Our only reporting unit with a goodwill balance at the beginning of fiscal 20142016 was Best Buy Domestic.our Domestic segment.

We review goodwill forOur detailed impairment by first assessing qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not thattesting involves comparing the fair value of theeach reporting unit is less thanto its carrying amount,value, including goodwill, asgoodwill. Fair value reflects the price a basis for determining whether it is necessarymarket participant would be willing to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair

64


value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conclude that goodwill is not impaired. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we conduct detailed impairment testing. The first step of the detailed testing involves estimating the fair valuepay in a potential sale of the reporting unit and comparing this to itsis based on discounted cash flows or relative market-based approaches. If the fair value exceeds carrying amount, including goodwill.value, then it is concluded that no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying amountvalue of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, thea second step of the two-step goodwill impairment test is required to measure thepossible goodwill impairment loss. The second step includes hypothetically valuing allthe tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’sunit's goodwill is compared to the carrying amountvalue of that goodwill. If the carrying amountvalue of the reporting unit’sunit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying amount.value. No goodwill impairment was recorded in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2014,2016, we determined that the fair value of the Best Buy Domestic reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, and as a result, no goodwill impairment was recorded in fiscal 2014.

In fiscal 2013 (11-month), initial goodwill impairment assessments as of November 4, 2012, based on forecasts in place at that time, indicated that fair value exceeded carrying value for each reporting unit. However, operating performance in our Best Buy Canada and Five Star reporting units fell significantly below expectations in the later part of the fiscal fourth quarter. Therefore, we updated our forecasts for Best Buy Canada and Five Star and tested for goodwill impairment as of the end of fiscal 2013 (11-month). The updated forecasts, which were used as the basis for our discounted cash flow ("DCF") valuations for goodwill testing purposes, reflected significantly lower cash flows than previously forecast. Our analysis for step one of detailed impairment testing indicated that carrying values exceeded fair values for both Best Buy Canada and Five Star. Step two entailed allocating the fair values determined from step one to the fair value of all recognized and appropriately unrecognized assets and liabilities to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. In both cases, this analysis led to the conclusion that the goodwill had no value, and therefore we recorded full impairment of the goodwill associated with Best Buy Canada ($611 million) and Five Star ($208 million). The combined goodwill impairment expense of $819 million is included in our International segment.

For the Best Buy Domestic reporting unit, we determined that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by a substantial margin and there were no events during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month) that would be more likely than not to reduce the fair value of the Domestic reporting unit below its carrying amount.

Refer to Note 3, Profit Share Buy-Out, for further information on the $1.2 billion goodwill impairment attributable to the Best Buy Europe reporting unit recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.2016.

Tradenames and Customer Relationships

Beginning in fiscal 2014, we have presentedWe include our tradenames and customer relationships within intangibles, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. All prior-year periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

We have an indefinite-lived tradename related to Pacific Sales included within our Domestic segment. We alsoAs of the end of fiscal 2016, we have no indefinite-lived tradenames related to Future Shop and Five Star included within our International segment.

Our valuation of identifiable intangible assets acquired is based on information and assumptions available to us at the time of acquisition, using income and market approaches to determine fair value. We amortize definite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. We do not amortize our indefinite-lived tradenames, but test for impairment annually, or when indications of potential impairment exist.

We utilize the relief from royalty method to determine the fair value of each of our indefinite-lived tradenames. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess. As a part of the Canada brand restructuring, we fully impaired the indefinite-lived Future Shop tradename during fiscal 2016. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for additional information. No other impairments were identified during fiscal 2014.

We previously had definite-lived customer relationships acquired as part of our acquisition of mindSHIFT within our Domestic segment, and Best Buy Europe within our International segment. At February 2, 2013, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of these customer relationships was $475 million and $272 million, respectively, resulting in a net book value of $203 million. These definite-lived intangible assets were written off as a result of the sales of mindSHIFT and Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2014 as described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations.2016.


6564


The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived tradenames by segment were as follows in fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month)2016, 2015 and 20122014 ($ in millions):
 Goodwill Indefinite-Lived Tradenames
 Domestic International Total Domestic International Total
Balances at February 26, 2011$422
 $2,032
 $2,454
 $21
 $84
 $105
Acquisitions(1)
94
 
 94
 1
 
 1
Impairments(2)

 (1,207) (1,207) 
 
 
Sale of business
 (7) (7) (3) (2) (5)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 1
 1
 
 1
 1
Other(3)

 
 
 
 28
 28
Balances at March 3, 2012516
 819
 1,335
 19
 111
 130
Acquisitions(4)
15
 
 15
 
 
 
Impairments(3) (819) (822) 
 
 
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 1
 1
Balances at February 2, 2013528
 
 528
 19
 112
 131
Impairments
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Sale of business(5)
(103) 
 (103) 
 (22) (22)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Balances at February 1, 2014$425
 $
 $425
 $19
 $82
 $101
 Goodwill Indefinite-Lived Tradenames
 Domestic International Total Domestic International Total
Balances at February 2, 2013$528
 $
 $528
 $19
 $112
 $131
Sale of business(1)
(103) 
 (103) 
 (22) (22)
Impairments
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Balances at February 1, 2014425
 
 425
 19
 82
 101
Sale of business(2)

 
 
 

 (37) (37)
Impairments
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 (6) (6)
Balances at January 31, 2015425
 
 425
 18
 39
 57
Canada brand restructuring (3)

 
 
 
 (40) (40)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 1
 1
Balances at January 30, 2016$425
 $
 $425
 $18
 $
 $18
(1)Represents goodwill acquired, primarily as a result of the mindSHIFT acquisition in fiscal 2012.
(2)
Represents the full impairment of goodwill attributable to Best Buy Europe as described in Note 3, Profit Share Buy-Out. The gross carrying amount of goodwill and cumulative impairment were written off as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2014.
(3)Represents the transfer of certain definite-lived tradenames (at their net book value) to indefinite-lived tradenames following our decision to no longer phase out certain tradenames. We believe these tradenames will continue to contribute to our future cash flows indefinitely.
(4)Represents goodwill acquired, primarily as a result of an acquisition made by mindSHIFT in fiscal 2013 (11-month).
(5)Represents goodwill written-off as a result of the sale of mindSHIFT in fiscal 2014 and indefinite-lived tradenames written off as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2014.
(2)Primarily represents the Five Star indefinite-lived tradenames classified as held for sale at January 31, 2015.
(3)
Represents the Future Shop tradename impaired as a result of the Canada brand restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. See Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for further discussion.
 
The following table provides the gross carrying amount of goodwill and cumulative goodwill impairment losses ($ in millions):
 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013
 
Gross Carrying
Amount(1)
 
Cumulative
Impairment(1)
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Cumulative
Impairment
Goodwill$1,308
 $(883) $2,608
 $(2,080)
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Cumulative
Impairment
 
Gross Carrying
Amount(1)
 
Cumulative
Impairment(1)
Goodwill$1,100
 $(675) $1,100
 $(675)
(1)
Excludes the gross carrying amount and cumulative impairment related to Best Buy Europe and mindSHIFT,Five Star, which were sold duringwas held for sale at the end of fiscal 2014.2015. The sale of Five Star was completed on February 13, 2015.
Insurance
 
We are self-insured for certain losses related to health, workers' compensation and general liability claims; however, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to these claims. A portion of these self-insured losses are managed through a wholly-owned insurance captive. We estimate our self-insured liabilities using a number of factors, including historical claims experience, an estimate of incurred but not reported claims, demographic and severity factors, and valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries. Our self-insured liabilities included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows ($ in millions):
February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Accrued liabilities$88
 $77
$62
 $60
Long-term liabilities52
 47
54
 53
Total$140
 $124
$116
 $113

66


Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.carry-forwards. We

65


record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

In determining our provision for income taxes, we use an annual effective income tax rate based on annual income, permanent differences between book and tax income, and statutory income tax rates. The effective income tax rate also reflects our assessment of the ultimate outcome of tax audits. We adjust our annual effective income tax rate as additional information on outcomes or events becomes available. Discrete events, such as audit settlements or changes in tax laws, are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Our income tax returns are periodically audited by U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax authorities. At any one time, multiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the tax benefits associated with our various tax filing positions, we record a tax benefit for uncertain tax positions using the highest cumulative tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a liability, is audited and effectively settled. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the period in which we determine the issue is effectively settled with the tax authorities, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. We include our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued penalties and interest, in accrued income taxes and long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and in income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Accrued Liabilities

The major components of accrued liabilities at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, were state and local tax liabilities, rent-related liabilities including accrued real estate taxes, loyalty program liabilities and self-insurance reserves.

Long-Term Liabilities

The major components of long-term liabilities at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, were unrecognized tax benefits, rent-related liabilities, deferred compensation plan liabilities, self-insurance reserves and deferred revenue.

Foreign Currency

Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at our consolidated balance sheet date. For operations reported on a one-month lag, we use the exchange rates in effect one month prior to our consolidated balance sheet date. Results of operations and cash flows are translated using the average exchange rates throughout the period. The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of assets and liabilities is included as a component of shareholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, which are included in SG&A, have not been significant in any of the periods presented.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue arises primarily from sales of merchandise and services. We also record revenue from sales of service contracts, extended warranties, other commissions and credit card programs. Revenue excludes sales taxes collected.

We recognize revenue when the sales price is fixed or determinable, collection is reasonably assured and the customer takes possession of the merchandise, or in the case of services, the service has been provided. Revenue is recognized for storeexcludes sales when the customer receives and pays for the merchandise. For online sales, we defer revenue and the related product costs for shipments that are in-transit to the customer, and recognize revenue at the time the customer receives the product. Online customers typically receive goods within a few days of shipment.taxes collected. Revenue from merchandise sales and services is reported net of sales returns, includingwhich includes an estimate of future returns based on historical return rates, with a corresponding reduction to cost of sales. Our sales returns reserve, which represents the estimated gross margin impact of returns, was $13$25 million and $14$25 million at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively.

We sell service contracts and extended warranties that typically have terms ranging from three months to four years. We also receive commissions for customer subscriptions with various third parties, notably from mobile phone network operators. In

67


instances where we are deemed to be the obligor on the service contract or subscription, the service and commission revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the service contract or subscription period. In instances where we are not deemed to be the obligor on the service contract or subscription, commissions are recognized in revenue when such commissions have been earned, primarily driven by customer activation. Service and commission revenues earned from the sale of extended warranties represented 2.1%, 2.4% and 2.4% of revenue in fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month) and 2012, respectively.

For revenue transactions that involve multiple deliverables, we defer the revenue associated with any undelivered elements. The amount of revenue deferred in connection with the undelivered elements is determined using the relative fair value of each element, which is generally based on each element's relative retail price.

Our deferred revenues primarily relate to merchandise not yet delivered to customers, services not yet completed and technical support contracts not yet completed. At February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, short-term deferred revenue was $399$357 million. At January 31, 2015, short-term deferred revenue was $376 million, of which $50 million is included in current liabilities held for sale in relation to the sale of Five Star. At January 30, 2016, and $451 million, respectively. At February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, deferred revenue included within long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $50$45 million and $62$49 million,, respectively.

Merchandise revenue

66


Revenue is recognized for store sales when the customer receives and pays for merchandise. In the case of items paid for in store but subsequently delivered to the customer, revenue is recognized once delivery has been completed.
For additional informationtransactions initiated online, customers choose whether to collect merchandise from one of our stores (“in-store pick up”) or have it delivered to them (typically using third party parcel delivery companies). For in-store pick up, we recognize revenue once the customer has taken possession of merchandise. For items delivered directly to the customer, we recognize revenue when delivery has been completed. Any fees charged to customers for delivery are also recognized when delivery has been completed.
Services
Revenue related to consultation, design, installation, set-up, repair and educational classes are recognized once the service is complete. We sell various protection plans with extended warranty coverage for merchandise and technical support to assist customers in using their devices. Such plans have terms typically ranging from one month to five years. For extended warranty protection, third party insurers assume all risk associated with the coverage and are deemed to be the legal obligor. We record the net commissions we receive (the amount charged to the customer less the amount remitted to the insurer) as revenue when the corresponding merchandise revenue is recognized.
For technical support contracts, we assume responsibility for fulfilling the support to customers and we recognize the associated revenue either on a straight-line basis over the life of the contracts, or, if sufficient history is available, on a consumption basis.
Credit card revenue
We offer promotional financing and credit cards issued by third-party banks that manage and directly extend credit to our credit card arrangementscustomers. The banks are the sole owners of the accounts receivable generated under the program and customer loyalty programs, see Credit Servicesaccordingly, we do not hold any consumer receivables related to these programs. We are eligible to receive a profit share from our banking partners based on the performance of the programs. We record such profit share as revenue once the portfolio period to which it relates is complete and Financing and Sales Incentives, respectively, below.

we have sufficient evidence to estimate the amount.
Gift Cardscards

We sell gift cards to our customers in our retail stores, through our websitesonline and through selectedselect third parties. We do not charge administrative fees on unused gift cards and our gift cards do not have an expiration date. We recognize revenue from gift cards when: (i) the gift card is redeemed by the customer, or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote ("gift card breakage"), and we determine that we do not have a legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. We determine our gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns. Based on our historical information, the likelihood of a gift card remaining unredeemed can be determined 24 months after the gift card is issued. At that time, we recognize breakage income for those cards for which the likelihood of redemption is deemed remote and we do not have a legal obligation to remit the value of such unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. Gift card breakage income is included in revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Gift card breakage income was as follows$65 million, $19 million and $53 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month)2016, 2015 and 2012 ($ in millions):
  12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
  2014 2013 2012
Gift card breakage income $53
 $46
 $54

Credit Services and Financing

In the U.S., we have an agreement with a bank for the issuance of promotional financing and customer loyalty credit cards bearing the Best Buy brand. Under the agreement, the bank manages and directly extends credit to our customers. Cardholders who choose promotional financing can receive deferred-interest financing on qualifying purchases. The bank is the sole owner of the accounts receivable generated under the program and accordingly, we do not hold any consumer receivables related to these programs. We earn revenue from the bank based primarily on the performance of the portfolio.
We also have similar agreements for promotional financing and credit cards with banks for our businesses in Canada, China and Mexico, and we account for these programs in a manner consistent with the U.S. agreement.
In addition, we also accept Visa®, MasterCard®, Discover®, JCB® and American Express® credit cards, as well as debit cards from all major international networks.2014, respectively.

Sales Incentives

We frequently offer sales incentives that entitle our customers to receive a reduction in the pricegift card at time of a productpurchase or service. Sales incentives include discounts, coupons and other offers that entitle a customer to receive a reduction in the price of a product or service either at the point of sale or by submitting a claim for a refund or rebate.(for example coupons, rebates, etc.). For sales incentives issued to athe customer in conjunction with a sale of merchandise or services, for which we are the obligor, the reduction in revenue is recognized at the time of sale, based on the expected retail value of the incentive expected to be redeemed.

68


Customer Loyalty Programs
We have customer loyalty programs which allow members to earn points for each qualifying purchase. Points earned enable members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases at our Best Buy branded stores. There are two primary ways that members may participate and earn loyalty points.
First, we have customer loyalty programs where members earn points for each purchase. Depending on the customer's membership level within our loyalty program, certificates expire either expirations typically range from 2 or to 12 months from the date of issuance. The retail value of points earned by our loyalty program members is included in accrued liabilities and recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the percentage of points that are projected to be redeemed.
Second, under our credit card agreement, we have a customer loyalty credit card bearing the Best Buy brand. Cardholders earn points for purchases made at our stores and related websites in the U.S., as well as purchases at other merchants. Points earned entitle cardholders to receive certificates that may be redeemed on future purchases at our stores and related websites. Certificates expire either 2 or 12 months from the date of issuance. The retail value of points earned by our cardholders is included in accrued liabilities and recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the percentage of points that are projected to be redeemed.
We recognize revenue when: (i) a certificate is redeemed by the customer; (ii) a certificate expires, or (iii) the likelihood of a certificate being redeemed by a customer is remote ("certificate breakage"). We determine our certificate breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns.

67


Cost of Goods Sold and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table illustrates the primary costs classified in each major expense category:
Cost of Goods Sold
 Total cost of products sold including:
   Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from our vendors to our distribution centers;
   Vendor allowances that are not a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs to promote a vendor's products;costs; and
   Cash discounts on payments to merchandise vendors;
 Cost of services provided including:
   Payroll and benefits costs for services employees; and
   Cost of replacement parts and related freight expenses;
 Physical inventory losses;
 Markdowns;
 Customer shipping and handling expenses;
 Costs associated with operating our distribution network, including payroll and benefit costs, occupancy costs and depreciation; and
 Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from our distribution centers to our retail stores.
SG&A
 Payroll and benefit costs for retail and corporate employees;
 Occupancy and maintenance costs of retail, services and corporate facilities;
 Depreciation and amortization related to retail, services and corporate assets;
 Advertising costs;
 Vendor allowances that are a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs to promote a vendor's products;
 Tender costs, including bank charges and costs associated with credit and debit card interchange fees;
 Charitable contributions;
 Outside and outsourced service fees;
 Long-lived asset impairment charges; and
 Other administrative costs, such as supplies, and travel and lodging.

69


Vendor Allowances
 
We receive allowances from certain vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements intended to offset our costs of promoting and selling merchandise inventories. Vendor allowances are primarily in the form of receipt-based funds or sell-through credits. Receipt-based funds are generally determined at an agreed percentage of purchases and are initially deferred and recorded as a reduction of merchandise inventories. The deferred amounts are then included as a reduction of cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. Sell-through credits are generally determined at an agreed percentage of sales and are recognized when the related product is sold. Vendor allowances provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs, such as specialized store labor or training costs, are included in SG&A as an expense reduction when the cost is incurred.
 
Advertising Costs
 
Advertising costs, which are included in SG&A, are expensed the first time the advertisement runs. Advertising costs consist primarily of digital, print and television advertisements, as well as promotional events. Advertising expenses were $775$742 million,, $732 $711 million and $828$757 million in fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month)2016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
We apply the fair value recognition provisions of accounting guidance as they relate to our stock-based compensation, which require us to recognize expense for the fair value of our stock-based compensation awards. We recognize compensation

68


expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award (or to an employee's eligible retirement date, if earlier).
 
2.  Fiscal Year-end Change
On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a change to our fiscal year-end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January. As a result of this change, our fiscal year 2013 was an 11-month transition period beginning March 4, 2012, through February 2, 2013. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we also began consolidating the results of our Europe, China and Mexico operations on a one-month lag, compared to a two-month lag in fiscal year 2012, to continue to align our fiscal reporting periods with statutory filing requirements.
The following table shows the fiscal months included within our financial statements and footnotes for fiscal 2014, fiscal 2013 (11-month) and fiscal 2012.
New Fiscal Calendar(1)
 
Previous Fiscal Calendar(1)
2014 2013 (11-Month) 2012
February 2013 - January 2014 March 2012 - January 2013 March 2011 - February 2012
(1)For entities reported on a lag, the fiscal months included in fiscal 2013 (11-month) were February through December, and in fiscal 2014 and 2012 were January through December.
January Results for Entities Reported on a Lag
As a result of the 11-month transition period in fiscal 2013, the month of January 2012 was not captured in our consolidated fiscal 2013 (11-month) results for those entities reported on a one-month lag. The following is selected financial data for the one month ended January 31, 2012, and the comparable prior year period, for entities reported on a lag ($ in millions):

70


 One Month Ended
 January 31, 2012 January 31, 2011
 (unaudited) (unaudited)
Revenue$189
 $249
Gross profit16
 24
Operating loss(14) (1)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations(13) 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(12) (28)
Net loss including noncontrolling interests(25) (28)
Net loss attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders(1)
(14) (33)
(1)The net loss attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for the one month ended January 31, 2012, represents the adjustment to retained earnings within the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity as a result of the exclusion of January results for entities reported on a lag.

In addition, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows includes a net reconciling adjustment for the cash flows as a result of the exclusion of January 2012 in fiscal 2013 (11-month) described above. The total adjustment was $74 million, primarily due to $50 million of cash used in financing activities and $18 million of cash used in investing activities. The total adjustment for January 2011 in fiscal 2012 (11-month recast) was $5 million. The adjustments for both periods included the effect of exchange rate changes on our cash balances.

3.  Profit Share Buy-Out

During fiscal 2008, we entered into a profit-sharing agreement with Carphone Warehouse Group plc ("CPW") (the "profit share agreement"). Under the terms of this agreement, CPW provided expertise and certain other resources to enhance our mobile telephone retail business ("Best Buy Mobile") in return for a share of incremental profits generated in excess of defined thresholds.

During fiscal 2009, we acquired a 50% controlling interest in the retail business of CPW, subsequently referred to as Best Buy Europe, which included the profit share agreement with Best Buy Mobile. CPW held a 50% noncontrolling interest in Best Buy Europe until the sale of our 50% interest in Best Buy Europe to CPW in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. Refer to Note 4, Discontinued Operations.

In November 2011, we announced strategic changes in respect of Best Buy Europe, including an agreement to buy out CPW's interest in the profit share agreement for $1.3 billion (the "Mobile buy-out"), subject to the approval of CPW shareholders. The Mobile buy-out was completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

Financial Reporting Impact of the Mobile Buy-out

We accounted for the Mobile buy-out transaction as a $1.3 billion payment to terminate the future payments due under the profit share agreement with Best Buy Europe, thereby eliminating CPW's interest in the profits. This payment is presented within net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings, consistent with the financial reporting of the previous recurring payments made pursuant to the profit share agreement. In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the payment to CPW is included within payment to noncontrolling interest, as part of cash flows from financing activities.

Goodwill Impairment - Best Buy Europe

We recorded $1.5 billion of goodwill as a result of our acquisition of Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2009. This goodwill was part of our Best Buy Europe reporting unit, which comprised our 50% controlling interest in Best Buy Europe and the profit share agreement with Best Buy Mobile.

At the time of the announcement of the Mobile buy-out in November 2011, we also announced the closure of our large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.K. As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2012, and in light of these strategic decisions, we performed an interim evaluation of potential impairment of goodwill associated with the Best Buy Europe reporting unit. Following the elimination of the profit share agreement from Best Buy Europe and the closure of large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.K., the remaining fair value of the Best Buy Europe reporting unit was entirely attributable to its small-format store retail operations. As a result of these events, we performed a goodwill impairment analysis and determined that the

71


goodwill attributable to the Best Buy Europe reporting unit, representing $1.2 billion as of January 24, 2012, had been fully impaired. The impairment loss is recorded in gain (loss) from discontinued operations within our Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2012.

Acceleration of Intervening Event

The results of Best Buy Europe were recorded on a two-month lag in fiscal 2012. However, as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Mobile buy-out in January 2012 constituted a significant intervening event. Consequently, the recording of all accounting impacts arising from the Mobile buy-out, including the goodwill impairment, were accelerated and recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 due to their significance to our consolidated financial statements.

4.  Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations comprise the following:

Domestic Segment

Napster – During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we sold certain assets comprising the domestic operations of Napster, Inc. to Rhapsody International and ceased operations in the U.S. Napster's operations comprised digital media download and streaming services in the U.S. In consideration for the sale of these assets, Best Buy received a minority investment in Rhapsody International. We do not exercise significant influence over Rhapsody International.

mindSHIFT – During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of mindSHIFT to Ricoh Americas Corporation, at which time we recorded an $18 million pre-tax loss.

International Segment

Best Buy China –Five Star - During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011,2015, we announcedentered into a definitive agreement to sell our Five Star business to Yingtan City Xiangyuan Investment Limited Partnership and Zhejiang Jiayuan Real Estate Group Co. On February 13, 2015, we completed the restructuringsale of our eight large-format Best Buy branded storesFive Star and recognized a gain on sale of $99 million. Following the sale of Five Star, we continue to hold one retail property in China.Shanghai, China, which remains held for sale at January 30, 2016, as we continue to actively market the property. The closureassets of Best Buy branded stores was completedthis property are classified as held for sale in the first quarterConsolidated Balance Sheets and were $31 million as of fiscal 2012.January 30, 2016. The presentation of discontinued operations has been retrospectively applied to all prior periods presented.

Best Buy Turkey – During the fourth quarterThe composition of fiscal 2011, we announced the closureassets and liabilities disposed of our two large-format Best Buy branded stores in Turkey. The exit activities were completed during the second quarteras a result of fiscal 2012, at which time we recorded a $4 million pre-tax gain on the sale of certain assets related to the stores.Five Star was as follows ($ in millions):
 February 13, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents$125
Receivables113
Merchandise inventories252
All other assets461
Total assets$951
  
Accounts payable$478
All other liabilities128
Total liabilities$606

Best Buy Europe – During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we announced the closure of our 11 large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.K. We completed the exit activities associated with these stores during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Best Buy Europe sold its retail business in Belgium, consisting of 82 small-format The Phone House stores, to Belgacom S.A. As a result of the sale, a pre-tax gain of $5 million was recorded in fiscal 2012.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe to CPW in return for the following consideration upon closing: net cash of £341 million ($526 million); £80 million ($123 million) of ordinary shares of CPW; £25 million ($39 million), plus 2.5% interest, to be paid by CPW on June 26, 2014; and £25 million ($39 million), plus 2.5% interest, to be paid by CPW on June 26, 2015. We subsequently sold the ordinary shares of CPW for $123 million on July 3, 2013. We received the first such deferred cash payment on June 26, 2014 and the second deferred cash payment on June 26, 2015.

In conjunction with our agreement to sell our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe, we entered into a deal-contingent foreign currency forward contract to hedge £455 million of the total £471 million of net proceeds. The contract was settled in cash following the completion of the sale on June 26, 2013, and we recognized a $2 million loss in gain (loss) from discontinued operations on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2014.


7269


The composition of assets and liabilities disposed of on June 26, 2013, as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe was as follows ($ in millions):
 June 26, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents$597
Receivables1,295
Merchandise inventories554
Other current assets168
Net property and equipment159
Other assets316
Total assets3,089
  
Accounts payable790
Short-term debt973
Other current liabilities1,145
Long-term liabilities65
Total liabilities2,973

The aggregate financial results of all discontinued operations for fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 were as follows ($ in millions):
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
 2014 2013 2012
Revenue$2,815
 $5,259
 $5,658
Restructuring charges(1)
100
 34
 239
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations before income tax benefit(240) 15
 (1,521)
Income tax benefit(2)
42
 37
 122
Gain on sale of discontinued operations32
 
 
Equity in loss of affiliates
 (5) (3)
Net gain (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests(166) 47
 (1,402)
Net (gain) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests11
 (19) (1,250)
Net gain (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders$(155) $28
 $(2,652)
 2016 2015 2014
Revenue$217
 $1,564
 $4,615
Restructuring charges(1)
1
 18
 110
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax benefit (expense)(2)
(8) (12) (235)
Income tax benefit (expense)(3)
(1) 
 31
Gain on sale of discontinued operations(4)
99
 1
 32
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests90
 (11) (172)
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
 (2) 9
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders$90
 $(13) $(163)
(1)
See Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges, for further discussion of the restructuring charges associated with discontinued operations.
(2)Includes a $175 million impairment to write down the book value of our investment in Best Buy Europe to fair value in fiscal 2014.
(3)Income tax benefit for fiscal 2014 includes a $27 million benefit related to a tax allocation between continuing and discontinued operations and a $15 million benefit related to the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe. The fiscal 2014 effective tax rate for discontinued operations differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the previously mentioned tax allocation, sale of mindSHIFT, restructuring charges and the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe. The sale of mindSHIFT, restructuring charges and impairment generally included no related tax benefit. The deferred tax assets related to the sale of mindSHIFT and restructuring charges generally resulted in an increase in the valuation allowance in an equal amount, of which the investment impairment is not tax deductible.
(4)Gain in fiscal 2014 is primarily comprised of the following: $28 million gain (with no tax impact) from sale of Best Buy Europe fixed-line business in Switzerland in the first quarter; $24 million gain (with no tax impact) from the sale of Best Buy Europe in the second quarter; and loss of $18 million from sale of mindSHIFT in the fourth quarter. Gain in fiscal 2016 of $99 million is from sale of Five Star in the first quarter.

5.3.   Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, we use a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.


73


Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:

Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets;
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.

Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management's estimates of market participant assumptions.

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.


70


The following tables settable sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, according to the valuation techniques we used to determine their fair values ($ in millions).:
   Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
 
Fair Value at
February 1, 2014
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents       
Money market funds$53
 $53
 $
 $
Commercial paper80
 
 80
 
Treasury bills263
 263
 
 
Short-term investments       
Commercial paper100
 
 100
 
Other current assets       
Foreign currency derivative instruments2
 
 2
 
Other assets       
Auction rate securities9
 
 
 9
Marketable securities that fund deferred compensation96
 96
 
 
Liabilities       
Accrued liabilities       
Foreign currency derivative instruments5
 
 5
 

74


  Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as  Fair Value at
Fair Value at
February 2, 2013
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Fair Value Hierarchy January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Assets            
Cash and cash equivalents            
Money market funds$520
 $520
 $
 $
Level 1 $51
 $265
Corporate bondsLevel 2 
 13
Commercial paperLevel 2 265
 165
Time depositsLevel 2 306
 100
Short-term investments     
Corporate bondsLevel 2 193
 276
Commercial paperLevel 2 122
 306
Time depositsLevel 2 990
 874
Other current assets

  
  
  
    
Foreign currency derivative instruments1
 
 1
 
Level 2 18
 30
Time depositsLevel 2 79
 83
Other assets

  
  
  
     
Interest rate swap derivative instrumentsLevel 2 25
 1
Auction rate securities21
 
 
 21
Level 3 2
 2
Marketable equity securities27
 27
 
 
Marketable securities that fund deferred compensation88
 88
 
 
Level 1 96
 97
Assets held for sale    
Cash and cash equivalents    
Money market fundsLevel 1 
 16
Time depositsLevel 2 
 124
Liabilities    
Accrued Liabilities    
Foreign currency derivative instrumentsLevel 2 1
 
 
The following table provides a reconciliationThere were no transfers between levels during fiscal 2016 and 2015. In addition, there were no changes in the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the tablestable above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) ($ in millions).
 Debt securities — Auction rate securities only
 Student loan bonds Municipal revenue bonds Total
Balances at March 3, 2012$80
 $2
 $82
Changes in unrealized losses in other comprehensive income4
 
 4
Sales(65) 
 (65)
Balances at February 2, 201319
 2
 21
Changes in unrealized losses in other comprehensive income1
 
 1
Sales(13) 
 (13)
Balances at February 1, 2014$7
 $2
 $9
for fiscal 2016 and 2015.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:
 
Money Market Funds. Our money market fund investments that are tradedwere measured at fair value as they trade in an active market using quoted market prices and, therefore, are classified as Level 1.

Corporate Bonds. Our corporate bond investments were measured at fair value using quoted market prices and, therefore,prices. They were classified as Level 1. Our money2 as they trade in a non-active market fund investments not traded on a regular basis or in an active market, and for which we have been unable to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis, were measured using inputs other than quoted marketbond prices that are observable for the investments and, therefore, were classified as Level 2.readily available.
 
Commercial Paper. Our investments in commercial paper were measured using inputs based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and, therefore, were classified as Level 2.

Treasury Bills.Time Deposits. Our Treasury bills weretime deposits are balances held with banking institutions that cannot be withdrawn for specified terms without a penalty. Time deposits are held at face value plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are classified as Level 1 as they trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.2.
 

71


Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments. Comprised primarily of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency swap contracts, our foreign currency derivative instruments were measured at fair value using readily observable market inputs, such as quotations on forward foreign exchange points and foreign interest rates. Our foreign currency derivative instruments were classified as Level 2 as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market.

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Instruments. Our interest rate swap contracts were measured at fair value using readily observable inputs, such as the LIBOR interest rate. Our interest rate swap derivative instruments were classified as Level 2 as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market.
 
Auction Rate Securities. Our investments in auction rate securities ("ARS") were classified as Level 3 as quoted prices were unavailable. Due to limited market information, we utilized a DCF model to derive an estimate of fair value. The assumptions we used in preparing the DCF model includedinclude estimates with respect to the amount and timing of future interest and principal payments, forward projections of the interest rate benchmarks, the probability of full repayment of

75


the principal considering the credit quality and guarantees in place, and the rate of return required by investors to own such securities given the current liquidity risk associated with ARS.
 
Marketable Equity Securities. Our marketable equity securities were measured at fair value using quoted market prices. They were classified as Level 1 as they trade in an active market for which closing stock prices are readily available.
Securities that Fund Deferred Compensation. The assets that fund our deferred compensation consist of investments in mutual funds. These investments were classified as Level 1 as the shares of these mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.
 
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis relate primarily to our tangible fixed assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are remeasured when the derived fair value is below carrying value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these assets, we do not periodically adjust carrying value to fair value except in the event of impairment. When we determine that impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to fair value and the difference is recorded within operating income in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
 
The following table summarizes the fair value remeasurements for non-restructuring property and equipment impairments goodwill impairments and restructuring activities recorded forin fiscal 20142016 and fiscal 2013 (11-month)2015 ($ in millions):
12-Month 2014 11-Month 20132016 2015
Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value(1)
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value (1)
Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value(1)
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value (1)
Continuing operations              
Property and equipment (non-restructuring)$101
 $10
 $60
 $8
$61
 $15
 $42
 $19
Goodwill(2)

 
 822
 
Restructuring activities(3)
       
Restructuring activities(2)
       
Property and equipment9
 
 59
 
30
 
 1
 
Investments16
 21
 27
 38
Total$126
 $31
 $968
 $46
Discontinued operations(4)
       
Property and equipment(5)
$220
 $
 $11
 $
Tradename4
 
 
 
40
 
 
 
Total$224
 $
 $11
 $
$131
 $15
 $43
 $19
Discontinued operations(3)
       
Property and equipment$
 $
 $1
 $
Total$
 $
 $1
 $
(1)Remaining net carrying value approximates fair value.
(2)
See Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information.
(3)
See Note 6,4, Restructuring Charges, for additional information.
(4)(3)Property and equipment and tradename impairments associated with discontinued operations are recorded within gain (loss)loss from discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
(5)
Includes the $175 million impairment to write down the book value of our investment in Best Buy Europe to fair value. Upon completion of the sale of Best Buy Europe as described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, the remaining net carrying values of all assets have been reduced to zero.

All of the fair value remeasurements included in the table above were based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as well as Note 3, Profit Share Buy-Out, for further information associated with the goodwill impairments. Fixed asset fair values were derived using a DCF model to estimate the present value of net cash flows that the asset or asset group wasis expected to generate. The key inputs to the DCF model generally included our forecasts of net cash generated from revenue, expenses and other significant cash outflows, such as capital expenditures, as well as an appropriate discount rate. For the tradename, fair value was derived using the relief from royalty method, as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. In the case of these specific

72


assets for which theirthe impairment was the result of restructuring activities, no future cash flows have been assumed as the assets will cease to be used and expected sale values are nominal.


76

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosures above, include cash, receivables, short-term investments, other investments, accounts payable, other payables and short- and long-term debt. The fair values of cash, receivables, short-term investments, accounts payable and other payables and short-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. If these instruments were measured at fair value in the financial statements, they would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Short-term investments other than those disclosed in the tables above represent time deposits. Fair values for other investments held at cost are not readily available, but we estimate that the carrying values for these investments approximate fair value. See Note 7,5, Debt, for information about the fair value of our long-term debt.

6.4.   Restructuring Charges
 
Summary
 
Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014 were as follows ($ in millions):
 2016 2015 2014
Continuing operations     
Canadian brand consolidation$200
 $
 $
Renew Blue(2) 11
 155
Other restructuring activities(1)
3
 (6) (6)
Total continuing operations201
 5
 149
Discontinued operations     
Renew Blue
 18
 10
Other restructuring activities(2)

 
 100
Total$201
 $23
 $259
(1) Represents activity related to our remaining vacant space liability for U.S. large-format store closures in fiscal 2013. We may continue to incur immaterial adjustments to the liability for changes in sublease assumptions or potential lease buyouts. In addition, lease payments for vacated stores will continue until leases expire or are terminated. The remaining vacant space liability was $18 million at January 30, 2016.

(2) Activity primarily relates to our fiscal 2013 (11-month)Best Buy Europe restructuring program, which is included in discontinued operations due to the sale of our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2014. Restructuring charges primarily consist of property and 2012 wereequipment impairments and employee termination benefits.

Canadian Brand Consolidation

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we consolidated the Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores and the conversion of the remaining 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand. In fiscal 2016, we incurred $200 million of restructuring charges related to implementing these changes, which primarily consisted of lease exit costs, a tradename impairment, property and equipment impairments, employee termination benefits and inventory write-downs. The inventory write-downs related to our Canadian brand consolidation are presented in restructuring charges – cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and the remainder of the restructuring charges are presented in restructuring charges in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.


73

Table of Contents

The composition of total restructuring charges we incurred for the Canadian brand consolidation in fiscal 2016 was as follows ($ in millions):
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
 2014 2013 2012
Continuing operations     
Renew Blue$165
 $171
 $
Fiscal 2013 U.S. restructuring(6) 257
 
Fiscal 2012 restructuring
 (1) 28
Fiscal 2011 restructuring
 (12) 20
Total159
 415
 48
Discontinued operations     
Fiscal 2013 Europe restructuring95
 36
 
Fiscal 2012 restructuring5
 (1) 215
Fiscal 2011 restructuring
 (1) 24
Total (Note 4)100
 34
 239
Total$259
 $449
 $287
 International
Continuing operations 
Inventory write-downs$3
Property and equipment impairments30
Tradename impairment40
Termination benefits25
Facility closure and other costs102
Total continuing operations$200

The following tables summarize our restructuring accrual activity during the fiscal 2016, related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with Canadian brand consolidation ($ in millions):
 
Termination
Benefits
 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balances at January 31, 2015$
 $
 $
Charges28
 113
 141
Cash payments(24) (47) (71)
Adjustments(1)
(2) 5
 3
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 (7) (7)
Balances at January 30, 2016$2
 $64
 $66

(1) The adjustments related to termination benefits relate to higher-than-expected employee retention. Adjustments to facility closure and other costs represent changes in sublease assumptions.

Renew Blue
 
Renew BluePlan
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, (11-month), we began implementinglaunched the Renew Blue strategy, which included initiatives intended to reduce costs and improve operating performance.performance and reduce costs. These initiatives included focusing on core business activities, reducing headcount, updating our store operating model and optimizing our real estate portfolio. These cost reduction initiatives representrepresented one of the key Renew Blue priorities for fiscal 2014 and cost reductions will continue priorities. We incurred $2 million of favorable adjustments related to be a priorityRenew Blue initiatives in fiscal 2015. We incurred $165 million of charges related to Renew Blue initiatives during fiscal 2014.2016. Of the total charges, $129adjustments, $1 million related to our Domestic segment, which consisted primarily of changes in retention assumptions used to estimate employee termination benefits. The remaining $1 million adjustment related to our International segment and consisted of facility closure and other costs. We expect to continue to implement cost reduction initiatives throughout fiscal 2017 as we further analyze our operations and strategies.
We incurred $29 million of charges related to Renew Blue initiatives during fiscal 2015. Of the total charges, $10 million related to our Domestic segment, which consisted primarily of employee termination benefits, investment impairments, and property and equipment impairments.benefits. The remaining $36$19 million of charges related to our International segment and consisted of employee termination benefits, facility closure and other costs, and property and equipment impairments. We expect to continue to implement cost reduction initiatives throughout fiscal 2015, as we further analyze our operations and strategies.
We incurred $171 million of charges related to Renew Blue initiatives during fiscal 2013 (11-month). Of the total charges, $84 million related to our Domestic segment, which consisted primarily of employee termination benefits, investment impairments, and property and equipment impairments. The remaining $87 million of charges related to our International segment and consisted of facility closure and other costs, property and equipment impairments and employee termination benefits.facility closure and other costs.

All restructuring chargesFor continuing operations, the inventory write-downs related to this plan are from continuing operations. Inventory write-downsour Renew Blue restructuring activities are presented in restructuring charges - cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the remainder of the restructuring charges are presented in restructuring charges. The restructuring charges from discontinued operations related to this plan are presented in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.discontinued operations.


7774


The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred for this program in fiscal 20142016, 2015 and 2013 (11-month),2014, as well as the cumulative amount incurred through the end of fiscal 2014,2016, was as follows ($ in millions):
Domestic International TotalDomestic International Total
12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 Cumulative Amount 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 Cumulative Amount 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 Cumulative Amount2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount 2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount 2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount
Continuing operations                                        
Inventory write-downs$
 $1
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
 $1
$
 $
 $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
Property and equipment impairments7
 7
 14
 2
 23
 25
 9
 30
 39

 
 7
 14
 
 1
 1
 25
 
 1
 8
 39
Termination benefits106
 46
 152
 28
 9
 37
 134
 55
 189
(2) 9
 106
 159
 
 5
 24
 38
 (2) 14
 130
 197
Investment impairments16
 27
 43
 
 
 
 16
 27
 43

 
 16
 43
 
 
 
 
 
 
 16
 43
Facility closure and other costs
 3
 3
 6
 55
 61
 6
 58
 64
1
 1
 
 5
 (1) (5) 1
 50
 
 (4) 1
 55
Total continuing operations(1) 10
 129
 222
 (1) 1
 26
 113
 (2) 11
 155
 335
Discontinued Operations                       
Property and equipment impairments
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
 
 
 1
 1
Termination benefits
 
 
 
 
 12
 4
 16
 
 12
 4
 16
Facility closure and other costs
 
 
 
 
 6
 5
 11
 
 6
 5
 11
Total discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 18
 10
 28
 
 18
 10
 28
Total$129
 $84
 $213
 $36
 $87
 $123
 $165
 $171
 $336
$(1) $10
 $129
 $222
 $(1) $19
 $36
 $141
 $(2) $29
 $165
 $363
 
The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 20142016 and 20132015 (11-month) related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with this program ($ in millions):
 Termination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balance at March 3, 2012$
 $
 $
Charges55
 54
 109
Cash payments(1) 
 (1)
Balance at February 2, 201354
 54
 108
Charges133
 16
 149
Cash payments(68) (23) (91)
Adjustments(8) 4
 (4)
Balance at February 1, 2014$111
 $51
 $162
Fiscal 2013 Europe Restructuring
In the third quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we also initiated a series of actions to restructure our Best Buy Europe operations in our International segment intended to improve operating performance. All restructuring charges related to this program are reported within gain (loss) from discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as a result of the sale of our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe. Refer to Note 4, Discontinued Operations. We incurred $95 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2014, consisting primarily of property and equipment impairments, and employee termination benefits. In fiscal 2013 (11-month), we incurred $36 million of charges related to employee termination benefits, property and equipment impairments, and facility closure and other costs. Given the sale of Best Buy Europe, we do not expect to incur additional restructuring charges related to this program.
The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred for this program in fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month), as well as the cumulative amount incurred through the end of fiscal 2014, was as follows ($ in millions):
 International
 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 Cumulative Amount
Discontinued operations     
Inventory write-downs$7
 $
 $7
Property and equipment impairments45
 12
 57
Termination benefits36
 19
 55
Tradename impairments4
 
 4
Facility closure and other costs3
 5
 8
Total$95
 $36
 $131

78


The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month) related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with this program ($ in millions):
Termination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 TotalTermination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balance at March 3, 2012$
 $
 $
Charges19
 5
 24
Cash payments(19) 
 (19)
Balance at February 2, 2013
 5
 5
Balance at February 1, 2014$111
 $51
 $162
Charges36
 2
 38
47
 16
 63
Cash payments(2) (7) (9)(121) (22) (143)
Adjustments(1)
(34) 
 (34)(21) (14) (35)
Balance at February 1, 2014$
 $
 $
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 (8) (8)
Balance at January 31, 201516
 23
 39
Charges
 
 
Cash payments(7) (9) (16)
Adjustments(1)
(7) (5) (12)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 1
 1
Balance at January 30, 2016$2
 $10
 $12
(1)
Represents the remaining liability written off as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe, as described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations.
Fiscal 2013 U.S. Restructuring
In the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we initiated a series of actions to restructure operations in our Domestic segment intended to improve operating performance. The actions included closure of 49 large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.S. and changes to the store and corporate operating models. The costs of implementing the changes primarily consisted of facility closure costs, employee termination benefits, and property and equipment (primarily store fixtures) impairments. We recognized a reduction to restructuring charges of $6 million in fiscal 2014 as a result of the buyout of a lease for less than the remaining vacant space liability. In fiscal 2013 (11-month), we incurred $257 million of charges, primarily consisting of facility closure and other costs, employee termination benefits, and property and equipment impairments. We do not expect to incur further material restructuring charges related to this program, with the exception of lease payments for vacated stores which will continue until the lease expires or we otherwise terminate the lease.
The restructuring charges related to this program are from continuing operations and are presented in restructuring charges in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred for this program in fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month), as well as the cumulative amount incurred through the end of fiscal 2014, was as follows ($ in millions):
 Domestic
 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 Cumulative Amount
Continuing operations     
Property and equipment impairments$
 $29
 $29
Termination benefits
 77
 77
Facility closure and other costs(6) 151
 145
Total$(6) $257
 $251
The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month) related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with this program ($ in millions):
 Termination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balance at March 3, 2012$
 $
 $
Charges109
 152
 261
Cash payments(65) (33) (98)
Adjustments(40) (6) (46)
Balance at February 2, 20134
 113
 117
Charges
 4
 4
Cash payments(2) (46) (48)
Adjustments(2) (13) (15)
Balance at February 1, 2014$
 $58
 $58

79


Fiscal 2012 Restructuring Plan

In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we implemented a series of actions to restructure operations in our Domestic and International segments. The actions within our Domestic segment included a decision to modify our strategy for certain mobile broadband offerings. In our International segment, we closed our large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.K. and impaired certain information technology assets supporting the restructured operations. All restructuring charges related to Best Buy Europe, including the charges related to the large-format Best Buy branded stores in the U.K., are reported within gain (loss) from discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Refer to Note 4, Discontinued Operations. All other restructuring charges related to this program are from continuing operations and are presented in restructuring charges in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

We incurred $5 million of charges related to this program in fiscal 2014, representing a change in sublease assumptions. During fiscal 2013 (11-month), we recorded a gain of $2 million related to this program, primarily related to our International segment from adjustments to estimated facility closures costs associated with the closure of our Best Buy branded stores in the U.K.

We incurred $243 million of charges related to this program during fiscal 2012. Of the total charges, $23 million related to our Domestic segment and consisted primarily of IT asset impairments and other related costs. The remaining $220 million of charges related to our International segment and consisted primarily of property and equipment impairments, facility closure and other costs, employee termination benefits and inventory write-downs. We do not expect to incur further material restructuring charges related to this program in either our Domestic or International segments, as we have substantially completed these restructuring activities.

The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred for this program in fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month) and 2012, as well as the cumulative amount incurred through the end of fiscal 2014, was as follows ($ in millions):
 Domestic International Total
 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 12-Month 2012 Cumulative Amount 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 12-Month 2012 Cumulative Amount 12-Month 2014 11-Month 2013 12-Month 2012 Cumulative Amount
Continuing operations                       
Property and equipment impairments$
 $
 $17
 $17
 $
 $
 $5
 $5
 $
 $
 $22
 $22
Termination benefits
 
 1
 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
Facility closure and other costs
 (1) 5
 4
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) 5
 4
Total
 (1) 23
 22
 
 
 5
 5
 
 (1) 28
 27
Discontinued operations                       
Inventory write-downs
 
 
 
 
 
 11
 11
 
 
 11
 11
Property and equipment impairments
 
 
 
 
 
 106
 106
 
 
 106
 106
Termination benefits
 
 
 
 
 1
 16
 17
 
 1
 16
 17
Facility closure and other costs
 
 
 
 5
 (2) 82
 85
 5
 (2) 82
 85
Total
 
 
 
 5
 (1) 215
 219
 5
 (1) 215
 219
Total$
 $(1) $23
 $22
 $5
 $(1) $220
 $224
 $5
 $(2) $243
 $246


80


The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 2014 and 2013 (11-month) related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with this program ($ in millions):
 Termination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balance at March 3, 2012$17
 $85
 $102
Charges1
 2
 3
Cash payments(18) (83) (101)
Adjustments(1)

 28
 28
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 4
 4
Balance at February 2, 2013

36
 36
Cash payments
 (33) (33)
Adjustments(2)

 (1) (1)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 (2) (2)
Balance at February 1, 2014$
 $
 $
(1)Included within adjustmentsAdjustments to termination benefits were due to higher-than-expected employee retention. Adjustments to facility closure and other costs is $34 million from the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), representing an adjustment to exclude non-cash charges or benefits, which had no impact on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2013 (11-month).
(2)
Included within adjustments to facility closure and other costs is a $5 million charge related to a changerepresent changes in sublease assumptions offset by a $(6) million adjustment to write off theand reductions in our remaining liability as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe, as described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations.
lease obligations.    

Fiscal 2011 Restructuring Plan

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we implemented a series of actions to restructure operations in our Domestic and International segments in order to improve performance and enhance customer service. The restructuring actions included plans to improve supply chain and operational efficiencies in our Domestic segment's operations, primarily focused on modifications to our distribution channels and exit from certain digital delivery services within our entertainment product category. During fiscal 2013 (11-month), we recorded a net reduction to restructuring charges of $13 million, which related primarily to our Domestic segment. The net reduction was largely the result of a gain recorded on the sale of a previously impaired distribution facility and equipment during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month) (previously impaired through restructuring charges), partially offset by charges associated with the exit from certain digital delivery services within our entertainment product category.

In fiscal 2012, we incurred $44 million of charges related to this program, which related primarily to our Domestic segment consisting primarily of property and equipment impairments (notably IT assets), employee termination benefits, intangible asset impairments and other costs associated with the exit from certain digital delivery services within our entertainment product category. Within our Domestic segment, we also incurred additional inventory write-downs as we completed the exit from certain distribution facilities associated with our entertainment product category at the end of fiscal 2012. We have completed activities under this program.

7.5.   Debt
 
Short-Term Debt
Short-term debt consisted of the following ($ in millions):
 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013
 
Principal
Balance
 
Interest
Rate
 
Principal
Balance
 
Interest
Rate
Europe revolving credit facility(1)
$
 % $596
 2.0%
  12-Month 11-Month
Fiscal Year 2014 2013
Maximum month-end amount outstanding during the year(1)
 $597
 $596
Average amount outstanding during the year(1)
 135
 477

81


(1)
Amounts relate to our previous £400 million Europe unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the "RCF"). Interest rates under the previous RCF were variable, based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on Best Buy Europe's fixed charges coverage ratio. As described in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, we sold our interest in Best Buy Europe on June 26, 2013.

U.S. Revolving Credit Facilities

On June 25, 2013,30, 2014, we entered into a $500 million 364-day$1.25 billion five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the "364-Day"Five-Year Facility Agreement") with a syndicate of lenders.banks. The 364-DayFive-Year Facility Agreement replacesreplaced the previous $1.0$1.5 billion senior

75


unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks, which was originally scheduled to expire on August 30, 2013,in October 2016, but was terminated on June 25, 2013.30, 2014.

The interest rate under the 364-DayFive-Year Facility Agreement is variable and is determined at the registrant'sour option as either:as: (i) the sum of (a) the greatest of (1) JPMorgan's prime rate, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (3) the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.0%, and (b) a variable margin rate (the “ABR Margin”); or (ii) the LIBOR plus a variable margin rate (the “LIBOR Margin”). In addition, a facility fee is assessed on the commitment amount. The ABR Margin, LIBOR Margin and the facility fee are based upon ourthe registrant's current senior unsecured debt rating by Standard and Poor's Rating Services and Moody's Investors Services, Inc. Under the 364-Day Facility Agreement, the ABR Margin ranges from 0.0% to 0.6%, the LIBOR Margin ranges from 0.925% to 1.6%, and the facility fee ranges from 0.075% to 0.275%. The 364-Day Facility Agreement terminates in June 2014 (subject to a one-year term-out option).

On October 7, 2011, we entered into a $1.5 billion five-year unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the "Five-Year Facility Agreement and, collectively with the 364-Day Facility Agreement, the "Agreements") with a syndicate of banks. The interest rates under the Five-Year Facility Agreement is variable and determined at our option as: (i) the sum of (a) the greatest of JPMorgan's prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, or the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.0%, and (b) a margin (the “ABR Margin”); or (ii) the LIBOR plus a margin (the “LIBOR Margin”). In addition, a facility fee is assessed on the commitment amount. The ABR Margin, LIBOR Margin and the facility fee are based upon our long-term credit ratings.rating. Under the Five-Year Facility Agreement, the ABR Margin ranges from 0.0% to 0.475%0.925%, the LIBOR Margin ranges from 0.875%1.000% to 1.475%1.925%, and the facility fee ranges from 0.125% to 0.275%0.325%. The Five-Year Facility Agreement terminates in October 2016.

The Agreements permit borrowings of up to $2.0 billion (which may be increased to up to $2.5 billion at our option under certain circumstances)At January 30, 2016, and a $300 million letter of credit sublimit. At February 1, 2014, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding and at February 1, 2014, $2.0January 30, 2016, $1.25 billion was available under the Agreements.Five-Year Facility Agreement.
 
The Agreements areFive-Year Facility Agreement is guaranteed by specified subsidiaries of Best Buy Co., Inc. and containcontains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict Best Buy Co., Inc. orand certain of its subsidiaries' ability to incur certain types or amounts of indebtedness, incur liens on certain assets, make material changes in corporate structure or the nature of its business, dispose of material assets, engage in a change in control transaction, make certain foreign investments, enter into certain restrictive agreements, or engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The AgreementsFive-Year Facility Agreement also containcontains financial covenants that require us to maintain a maximum quarterly cash flow leverage ratio and a minimum quarterly interest coverage ratio.ratio (both ratios measured quarterly for the previous 12 months). The Agreements contain customaryFive-Year Facility Agreement contains default provisions including, but not limited to, failure to pay interest or principal when due and failure to comply with covenants.

Canada Revolving Demand Facility

We have $4 million in a revolving demand facility available to our Canada operations. There were no borrowings outstanding under the facility at February 1, 2014, or February 2, 2013. There is no set expiration date for the facility. All borrowings under the facility are made available at the sole discretion of the lender and are payable on demand. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at rates specified in the credit agreement for the facility. Borrowings are secured by a guarantee of Best Buy Co., Inc.

China Revolving Demand Facilities

We have $158 million in revolving demand facilities available to our China operations, of which no borrowings were outstanding at February 1, 2014, or February 2, 2013. The facilities are renewed annually with the respective banks. All borrowings under these facilities bear interest at rates specified in the related credit agreements, are made available at the sole discretion of the respective lenders and are payable on demand. Certain of these facilities are secured by a guarantee of Best Buy Co., Inc.

82


Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt consisted of the following ($ in millions):
February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
2013 Notes$
 $500
2016 Notes349
 349
$350
 $350
2018 Notes500
 
500
 500
2021 Notes649
 648
650
 650
Financing lease obligations, due 2015 to 2026, interest rates ranging from 3.0% to 8.1%95
 122
Capital lease obligations, due 2015 to 2036, interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 9.3%63
 80
Other debt, due 2017, interest rate 6.7%1
 1
Interest rate swap valuation adjustments25
 1
Other debt
 1
Subtotal1,525
 1,502
Debt discounts and issuance costs(7) (10)
Financing lease obligations178
 69
Capital lease obligations38
 52
Total long-term debt1,657
 1,700
1,734
 1,613
Less: current portion(1)
(45) (547)
Less: current portion(395) (41)
Total long-term debt, less current portion$1,612
 $1,153
$1,339
 $1,572
(1)Our 2013 Notes due July 15, 2013, which we retired on July 15, 2013, are classified in the current portion of long-term debt as of February 2, 2013.

2013 Notes
We retired our $500 million principal amount of notes plus accrued interest when they matured on July 15, 2013, using available cash.
2018 Notes
 
On July 16, 2013, we completed the sale of $500 million principal amount of notes due August 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). The 2018 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.00% per year, payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on February 1, 2014. Net proceeds from the sale of the 2018 Notes were $495 million, after underwriting and issue discounts totaling $5 million.
 
We may redeem some or all of the 2018 Notes at any time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes to be redeemed and (2) the sum of the present values of each remaining scheduled payment of principal and interest on the 2018 Notes to be redeemed discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points. Furthermore, if a change of control triggering event occurs, we will be required to offer to purchase the remaining unredeemed 2018 Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date.
 

76


The 2018 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The 2018 Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur debt secured by liens and enter into sale and lease-back transactions.
 
2016 and 2021 Notes
 
In March 2011, we issued $350 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2016 (the “2016 Notes”) and $650 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2021 (the “2021 Notes” and, together with the 2016 Notes, the “Notes”). In March 2016, we repaid the 2016 Notes using existing cash resources. The 2016 Notes bearbore interest at a fixed rate of 3.75% per year, while the 2021 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% per year. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2011. The Notes were issued at a slight discount to par, which when coupled with underwriting discounts of $6 million, resulted in net proceeds from the sale of the Notes of $990 million.
 
We may redeem some or all of the Notes at any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount and (ii) the sum of the present values of each remaining scheduled payment of principal and interest discounted to the redemption date on a semiannual basis, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to the redemption date as described in the indenture (including the supplemental indenture) relating to the Notes. Furthermore, if a change of control triggering event occurs, we will be required to offer to purchase the remaining unredeemed Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date.

83


The Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur debt secured by liens or to enter into sale and lease-back transactions.
 
OtherFair Value and Future Maturities
 
The fair value of long-term debt, excluding debt discounts and issuance costs and financing and capital lease obligations, approximated $1,690$1,543 million and $1,652$1,494 million at February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, respectively, based primarily on the askquoted market prices, quoted from external sources, compared to carrying values of $1,657$1,525 million and $1,700$1,502 million,, respectively. If our long-term debt was recorded at fair value, it would be classified as Level 1.2 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
At February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016, the future maturities of long-term debt, including capitalized leases,excluding debt discounts and issuance costs and financing and capital lease obligations (see Note 8, Leases, for the future lease obligation maturities), consisted of the following ($ in millions):
Fiscal Year    
2015 $45
2016 38
2017 372
 $350
2018 16
 
2019 509
 517
2020 
2021 
Thereafter 677
 658
Total long-term debt $1,657
 $1,525

8.6.   Derivative Instruments

We manage our economic and transaction exposure to certain risks through the use of foreign currency derivative instruments and interest rate swaps. Our objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of net earnings, cash flows and net asset value associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We do not hold derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We have no derivatives that have credit risk-related contingent features, and we mitigate our credit risk by engaging with financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings as our counterparties.

We record all derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value and evaluate hedge effectiveness prospectively and retrospectively when electing to apply hedge accounting. We formally document all hedging relations at the inceptions for derivative hedges and the underlying hedged items, as well as the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, we have derivatives which are not designated as hedging instruments.

77



Net Investment Hedges

We use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against the effect of Canadian dollar exchange rate fluctuations on a portion of our net investment in our Canadian operations. The contracts have terms up to 12 months. For a net investment hedge, we recognize changes in the fair value of the derivative as a component of foreign currency translation within other comprehensive income to offset a portion of the change in translated value of the net investment being hedged, until the investment is sold or liquidated. We limit recognition in net earnings of amounts previously recorded in other comprehensive income to circumstances such as complete or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss, if any, in net earnings.

Interest Rate Swaps

We use "receive fixed-rate, pay variable-rate" interest rate swaps to mitigate the effect of interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our 2018 Notes and 2021 Notes. Our interest rate swap contracts are considered perfect hedges because the critical terms and notional amounts match those of our fixed-rate debt being hedged and are therefore accounted as a fair value hedge using the shortcut method. Under the shortcut method, we recognize the change in the fair value of the derivatives with an offsetting change to the carrying value of the debt. Accordingly, there is no impact on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings from the fair value of the derivatives.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

We use foreign currency forward contracts to manage the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to recognized receivable and payable balances denominated in non-functional currencies. The contracts generally have terms of up to 12 months. These derivative instruments are not designated in hedging relationships and, therefore, we record gains and losses on these contracts directly to net earnings.

Summary of Derivative Balances

The following table presents the gross fair values for outstanding derivative instruments and the corresponding classification at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015:
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Contract TypeAssetsLiabilities AssetsLiabilities
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges(1)
$15
$1
 $19
$
Derivatives designated as interest rate swaps(2)
25

 1

No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)(1)
3

 11

Total$43
$1
 $31
$
(1)The fair value is recorded in other current assets or accrued liabilities.
(2)The fair value is recorded in other assets or long-term liabilities.
The following table presents the effects of derivative instruments on Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI") and on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
 2016 2015
Contract TypePre-tax Gain(Loss) Recognized in OCI Gain(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Earnings (Effective Portion) Pre-tax Gain(Loss) Recognized in OCI Gain(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Earnings (Effective Portion)
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges$21
 $
 $22
 $


78


The following table presents the effects of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on our consolidated statements of earnings for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
 Gain (Loss) Recognized within SG&A
Contract Type2016 2015
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)$4
 $12

The following table presents the notional amounts of our derivative instruments at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015:
 Notional Amount
Contract TypeJanuary 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges208
 197
Derivatives designated as interest rate swaps750
 145
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)94
 212
Total1,052
 554

7.   Shareholders' Equity

Stock Compensation Plans

Our 20042014 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan as amended (the "Omnibus Plan"), authorizes us to grant or issue non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, share awardsstock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other equity awards up to a total of 64.522.5 million shares with a limit of 26.3 million shares of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents settled in shares and other stock grants. shares. We have not granted incentive stock options under the Omnibus Plan. Under the terms of the Omnibus Plan, awards may be granted to our employees, officers, advisors,advisers, consultants and directors. Awards issued under the Omnibus Plan vest as determined by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of our Board of Directors at the time of grant. At Awards granted, forfeited or canceled under the previous plan, the 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, after February 1, 2014, adjust the amount available under the Omnibus Plan. At January 30, 2016, a total of 19.1 million shares in total, and10.019.6 million shares of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents settled in shares and other stock grants were available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan.

Upon adoption and approval of the Omnibus Plan, all of our previous equity incentive compensation plans were terminated. However, existing awards under those plans continued to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule and will expire at the end of their original term.

Our outstanding stock options have a 10-year term. Outstanding stock options issued to employees generally vest over a three or four-year period, and outstanding stock options issued to directors vest immediately upon grant. Share awards vest based either upon attainment of specified goals or upon continued employment. Outstanding share awards that are not time-based vest at the end of a three-year incentive period based upon our total shareholder return ("TSR") compared to the TSR of companies that comprise Standard & Poor's 500 Index ("market-based"). We have time-based share awards that vest in their entirety at the end of three- and four-year periods, time-based share awards where 25% of the award vests on the date of grant and 25% vests on each of the three anniversary dates thereafter, and time-based share awards to directors vest one year from the grant date.

During fiscal 2014, our Employee Stock Purchase Plan was amended. The Plan permits employees to purchase our common stock at a 5% discount from the market price at the end of semi-annual purchase periods and is non-compensatory. During fiscal 2013 (11-month) and 2012,, the Plan permitted our employees to purchase our common stock at a 15% discount from the market price of the stock at the beginning or at the end of a semi-annual purchase period, whichever is less, and was considered compensatory. Employees are required to hold the common stock purchased for 12 months. In fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, 2013 (11-month) and 2012, 0.60.2 million, 1.00.3 million and 1.40.6 million shares, respectively, were purchased through our employee stock purchase plans. At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, plan participants had accumulated $2 million and $41 million, respectively, to purchase our common stock pursuant to these plans.


84


Stock-based compensation expense was as follows in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):

79


12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Stock options$25
 $43
 $76
$15
 $17
 $25
Share awards          
Market-based9
 2
 
16
 10
 9
Time-based62
 62
 33
73
 60
 62
Employee stock purchase plans1
 5
 11

 
 1
Total$97
 $112
 $120
$104
 $87
 $97
 
Stock Options
 
Stock option activity was as follows in fiscal 20142016:
 
Stock
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Outstanding at February 2, 201329,983,000
 $36.93
    
Granted2,741,000
 $22.53
    
Exercised(5,169,000) $31.21
    
Forfeited/Canceled(5,454,000) $37.36
    
Outstanding at February 1, 201422,101,000
 $36.38
 5.4 $16
Vested or expected to vest at February 1, 201421,597,000
 $36.68
 5.3 $16
Exercisable at February 1, 201416,926,000
 $40.11
 4.4 $5
 
Stock
Options
 Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share 
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 201517,342,000
 $36.81
    
Granted1,267,000
 $40.68
    
Exercised(1,432,000) $28.24
    
Forfeited/Canceled(2,935,000) $44.15
    
Outstanding at January 30, 201614,242,000
 $36.51
 4.7 $20
Vested or expected to vest at January 30, 201613,986,000
 $36.47
 4.6 $20
Exercisable at January 30, 201611,668,000
 $37.09
 3.8 $18
 
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 was $7.7711.59, $5.119.09 and $7.947.77, respectively, per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) exercised during fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014, was$14 million, $13 million and $39 million, $0 million and $6 million, respectively. At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, there was $29$15 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years.
 
Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $15840 million, $142 million and $27158 million in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014, respectively.

There was $13$5 million,$5 million and $13 million of income tax benefits realized from stock option exercises in fiscal 2014. The actual income tax benefit realized from stock option exercises was $0 million2016, 2015 and $2 million, in fiscal 2013 (11-month) and 20122014, respectively.

In fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014, we estimated the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using a lattice or Black Scholes valuation model (for certain individuals) with the following assumptions:
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
Valuation Assumptions(1)
 2014 2013 2012 2016 2015 2014
Risk-free interest rate(2)
 0.1% – 1.8%
 0.1% – 2.0%
 0.1% – 3.6%
 0.1% – 2.1%
 0.1% – 2.4%
 0.1% – 1.8%
Expected dividend yield 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.0%
Expected stock price volatility(3)
 46% 44% 37% 37% 40% 46%
Expected life of stock options (in years)(4)
 5.9
 5.9
 6.2
 6.0
 6.0
 5.9
(1)Forfeitures are estimated using historical experience and projected employee turnover.
(2)Based on the U.S. Treasury constant maturity interest rate whose term is consistent with the expected life of our stock options.
(3)In projecting expected stock price volatility, we consider both the historical volatility of our stock price as well as implied volatilities from exchange-traded options on our stock.
(4)We estimate the expected life of stock options based upon historical experience.

85


Market-Based Share Awards

The fair value of market-based share awards is determined based on generally accepted valuation techniques and the closing market price of our stock on the date of grant.using Monte-Carlo simulation. A summary of the status of our nonvested market-based share awards at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and changes during fiscal 20142016, is as follows:

80


Market-Based Share Awards Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at February 2, 2013 805,000
 $16.76
Outstanding at January 31, 2015 1,704,000
 $24.16
Granted 1,044,000
 $24.26
 758,000
 $31.48
Vested (20,000) $19.89
 (914,000) $16.73
Forfeited/Canceled (193,000) $21.82
 (86,000) $28.85
Outstanding at February 1, 2014 1,636,000
 $20.91
Outstanding at January 30, 2016 1,462,000
 $32.33

At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, there was $2119 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested market-based share awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.01.8 years.

Time-Based Share Awards

The fair value of time-based share awards is determined based on the closing market price of our stock on the date of grant. This value is reduced by the present value of expected dividends during vesting when the employee is not entitled to dividends.

A summary of the status of our nonvested time-based share awards at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and changes during fiscal 20142016, is as follows:
Time-Based Share Awards Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at February 2, 2013 7,751,000
 $21.05
Outstanding at January 31, 2015 5,543,000
 $24.40
Granted 3,433,000
 $22.99
 2,683,000
 $38.72
Vested (2,642,000) $22.06
 (2,503,000) $23.10
Forfeited/Canceled (1,477,000) $21.61
 (620,000) $29.98
Outstanding at February 1, 2014 7,065,000
 $21.49
Outstanding at January 30, 2016 5,103,000
 $31.89

At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, there was $9385 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested time-based share awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

Earnings per Share

We compute our basic earnings per share based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, and our diluted earnings per share based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include stock options, nonvested share awards and shares issuable under our employee stock purchase plan, as well as common shares that would have resulted from the assumed conversion of our convertible debentures. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we repurchased and redeemed all of the remaining outstanding convertible debentures. Since the potentially dilutive shares related to the convertible debentures are included in the computation, the related interest expense, net of tax, is added back to net earnings, as the interest would not have been paid if the convertible debentures had been converted to common stock.plan. Nonvested market-based share awards and nonvested performance-based share awards are included in the average diluted shares outstanding each period if established market or performance criteria have been met at the end of the respective periods.


86


At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, options to purchase 22.114.2 million shares of common stock were outstanding as follows (shares in millions):
Exercisable Unexercisable TotalExercisable Unexercisable Total
Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
In-the-money2.6
 15% $23.84
 4.3
 83% $21.45
 6.9
 31% $22.36
4.2
 36% $24.73
 1.3
 52% $27.45
 5.5
 39% $25.37
Out-of-the-money14.3
 85% $43.14
 0.9
 17% $36.91
 15.2
 69% $42.77
7.5
 64% $44.15
 1.2
 48% $40.51
 8.7
 61% $43.62
Total16.9
 100% $40.11
 5.2
 100% $24.16
 22.1
 100% $36.38
11.7
 100% $37.09
 2.5
 100% $33.87
 14.2
 100% $36.51

The computation of dilutive shares outstanding excludes the out-of-the-money stock options because such outstanding options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive (i.e., including such options would result in higher earnings per share).


81


The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($, except per share amounts, and shares in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 
2013(1)
 20122016 2015 2014
Numerator (in millions):          
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations$689
 $(467) $1,424
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests(2) (2) (3)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc., shareholders, basic687
 (469) 1,421
Adjustment for assumed dilution:     
Interest on convertible debentures due in 2022, net of tax
 
 5
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc., shareholders, diluted$687
 $(469) $1,426
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc., shareholders$807
 $1,246
 $695
Denominator (in millions):          
Weighted-average common shares outstanding342.1
 338.6
 366.3
346.5
 349.5
 342.1
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:          
Shares from assumed conversion of convertible debentures
 
 7.6
Stock options and other5.5
 
 0.6
4.2
 4.1
 5.5
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution347.6
 338.6
 374.5
350.7
 353.6
 347.6
Net earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders     
Net earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders     
Basic$2.01
 $(1.38) $3.88
$2.33
 $3.57
 $2.03
Diluted$1.98
 $(1.38) $3.81
$2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
(1)The calculation of diluted loss per share for fiscal 2013 (11-month) does not include potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive (i.e., reduce the net loss per share).

Repurchase of Common Stock
 
In June 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 billion share repurchase program. The June 2011 program replaced our prior $5.5 billion share repurchase program authorized in June 2007. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 share repurchase program.

On January 22, 2016, we entered into a variable notional accelerated share repurchase agreement ("ASR") with a third party financial institution to repurchase $150 million to $175 million of our common stock. Under the agreement, we paid $175 million at the beginning of the contract and received an initial delivery of 4.4 million shares on January 25, 2016. We retired these shares and recorded a $120 million reduction to stockholders' equity. As of January 30, 2016 the remaining $55 million was included as a reduction of stockholders' equity in "Prepaid Share Repurchase". We accounted for the variable component of shares to be delivered under the ASR as a forward contract indexed to our common stock, which met all of the criteria for equity classification, and therefore, was not accounted for as a derivative instrument but instead was accounted for as a component of equity. The ASR continued to meet the requirements for equity classification as of January 30, 2016.

The delivery of 4.4 million shares reduced our outstanding shares used to determine our weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the twelve months ended January 30, 2016. We evaluated the ASR agreement for potential dilutive effects of any shares remaining to be received or owed upon settlement and determined the additional shares to be received would be anti-dilutive, and therefore they were not included in our calculation of diluted earnings per share for the the twelve months ended January 30, 2016.

The ASR was settled on February 17, 2016 for a final notional amount of $165 million. Accordingly we received 1.6 million shares, which were retired, and a $10 million cash payment from our counter-party equal to the difference between the $175 million up-front payment and the final notional amount. The final notional amount was determined based upon the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the ASR agreement. The number of shares delivered was based upon the final notional amount and the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement, less an agreed-upon discount.


8782


The following table presents information regarding the amount and cost of shares we repurchased and retired in fiscal 20142016, noting that we had no repurchases and retirements in fiscal 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 under the June 2011 program and the June 2007 program ($, except per share amounts, and shares in millions):
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
 2014 2013 2012
June 2011 Program     
Total number of shares repurchased
 6.3
 34.5
Total cost of shares repurchased$
 $122
 $889
June 2007 Program     
Total number of shares repurchased
 
 20.1
Total cost of shares repurchased$
 $
 $611
  2016
Total cost of shares repurchased  
Open market $880
January 2016 ASR 120
     Total $1,000
   
Average price per share  
Open market $31.03
January 2016 ASR $27.28
     Average $30.53
   
Number of shares repurchased and retired  
Open market 28.4
January 2016 ASR 4.4
     Total 32.8
 
At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, $4.03.0 billion remained available for additional purchases under the June 2011 share repurchase program. Repurchased shares have been retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares.
 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Comprehensive income (loss) is computed as net earnings (loss) plus certain other items that are recorded directly to shareholders' equity. In addition to net earnings (loss), the significant components of comprehensive income (loss) include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale marketable equity securities. Foreign currency translation adjustments do not include a provision for income tax expense when earnings from foreign operations are considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2014, 2013 (11-month)2016, 2015, and 2012,2014, respectively ($ in millions):
Foreign Currency Translation Available-For-Sale Investments TotalForeign Currency Translation Available-For-Sale Investments Total
Balances at February 26, 2011$102
 $71
 $173
Foreign currency translation adjustments(9) 
 (9)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 (26) (26)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 (48) (48)
Balances at March 3, 201293
 (3) 90
Adjustment for fiscal year-end change11
 
 11
Balances at January 28, 2012104
 (3) 101
Foreign currency translation adjustments9
 
 9
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
 2
 2
Balances at February 2, 2013113
 (1) 112
$113
 $(1) $112
Foreign currency translation adjustments(136) 
 (136)(136) 
 (136)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
 7
 7

 7
 7
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings due to sale of business508
 
 508
508
 
 508
Reclassification of losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 1
 1

 1
 1
Balances at February 1, 2014$485
 $7
 $492
$485
 $7
 $492
Foreign currency translation adjustments(103) 
 (103)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 (3) (3)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 (4) (4)
Balances at January 31, 2015$382
 $
 $382
Foreign currency translation adjustments(44) 
 (44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings(67) 
 (67)
Balances at January 30, 2016$271
 $
 $271

83


 
There is generally no tax impact related to foreign currency translation adjustments, as the earnings are considered permanently reinvested. In addition, there were no material tax impacts related to gains or losses on available-for-sale investments in the periods presented.

88


9.8.   Leases

The composition of net rent expense for all operating leases, including leases of property and equipment, was as follows in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Minimum rentals$951
 $890
 $980
$797
 $848
 $864
Contingent rentals2
 1
 2
1
 2
 2
Total rent expense953
 891
 982
798
 850
 866
Less: sublease income(18) (16) (18)(15) (18) (18)
Net rent expense$935
 $875
 $964
$783
 $832
 $848

The future minimum lease payments under our capital, financing and operating leases by fiscal year (not including contingent rentals) at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, were as follows ($ in millions):
Fiscal Year 
Capital
Leases
 
Financing
Leases
 
Operating
Leases(1)
 
Capital
Leases
 
Financing
Leases
 
Operating
Leases(1)
2015 $26
 $27
 $1,027
2016 18
 25
 931
2017 8
 19
 807
 $14
 $42
 $813
2018 3
 15
 656
 9
 35
 708
2019 2
 9
 496
 6
 29
 572
2020 3
 23
 439
2021 2
 17
 310
Thereafter 17
 17
 1,116
 12
 66
 521
Subtotal 74
 112
 $5,033
Less: imputed interest (11) (17)  
Present value $63
 $95
  
Total minimum lease payments 46
 212
 $3,363
Less amount representing interest (8) (34)  
Present value of minimum lease payments 38
 178
  
Less current maturities (12) (33)  
Present value of minimum lease maturities, less current maturities $26
 $145
  
(1)
Operating lease obligations do not include payments to landlords covering real estate taxes and common area maintenance. These charges, if included, would increase total operating lease obligations by $1.5$1.1 billion at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016.

Total minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rent income of approximately $16072 million due under future noncancelable subleases.

10.9.    Benefit Plans

We sponsor retirement savings plans for employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Participants may choose from various investment options, including a fund comprised of our company stock. Participants can contribute up to 50% of their eligible compensation annually as defined by the plan document, subject to Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") limitations. We match 100% of the first 3% of participating employees' contributions and 50% of the next 2%. Employer contributions vest immediately. The total employer contributions were $6553 million, $6260 million and $6965 million in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014, respectively.

We have a non-qualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan for highly compensated employees and members of our Board of Directors. Amounts contributed and deferred under our deferred compensation plan are credited or charged with the performance of investment options offered under the plan and elected by the participants. In the event of bankruptcy, the assets of the plan are available to satisfy the claims of general creditors. The liability for compensation deferred under the plan was $5434 million and $5844 million at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, respectively, and is included in long-term liabilities. We manage the risk of changes in the fair value of the liability for deferred compensation by electing to match our liability under

84


the plan with investment vehicles that offset a substantial portion of our exposure. The cashfair value of the investment vehicles, which includes funding for future deferrals, was $96 million and $8897 million at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, and February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, respectively, and is included in other assets. Both the asset and the liability are carried at fair value.


89


11.10.   Income Taxes

The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to income tax expense in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Federal income tax at the statutory rate$380
 $(70) $758
$458
 $485
 $379
State income taxes, net of federal benefit25
 (2) 47
38
 43
 26
(Benefit) expense from foreign operations(13) 49
 (63)5
 (23) (23)
Other6
 5
 
2
 (11) 6
Goodwill impairments (non-deductible)
 287
 
Legal entity reorganization
 (353) 
Income tax expense$398
 $269
 $742
$503
 $141
 $388
Effective income tax rate36.7% (135.8)% 34.3%38.4% 10.1% 35.8%

Legal Entity Reorganization

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased CPW’s interest in the Best Buy Mobile profit share agreement for $1.3 billion (the “Mobile buy-out”). The Mobile buy-out completed by our U.K. subsidiary resulted in the $1.3 billion purchase price being assigned, for U.S. tax purposes only, to an intangible asset. The Mobile buy-out did not, however, result in a similar intangible asset in the U.K., as the Mobile buy-out was considered part of a tax-free equity transaction for U.K. tax purposes.

Because the U.S. tax basis in the intangible asset was considered under U.S. tax law to be held by our U.K. subsidiary, which was regarded as a foreign corporation for U.S. tax purposes, ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires that no deferred tax asset may be recorded in respect of the intangible asset. ASC 740-30-25-9 also precludes the recording of a deferred tax asset on the outside basis difference of the U.K. subsidiary. As a result, the amortization of the U.S. tax basis in the intangible asset only resulted in a periodic income tax benefit by reducing the amount of the U.K. subsidiary’s income, if any, that would otherwise have been subject to U.S. income taxes.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we filed an election with the Internal Revenue Service to treat the U.K. subsidiary as a disregarded entity such that its assets are now deemed to be assets held directly by a U.S. entity for U.S. tax purposes. This tax-only election, which resulted in the liquidation of the U.K. subsidiary for U.S. tax purposes, resulted in the elimination of the Company’s outside basis difference in the U.K. subsidiary. Additionally, the election resulted in the recognition of a deferred tax asset (and corresponding income tax benefit) for the remaining unrecognized inside tax basis in the intangible, in a manner similar to a change in tax status as provided in ASC 740-10-25-32.

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in income (loss) of affiliates by jurisdiction was as follows in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
United States$687
 $279
 $1,644
$1,310
 $1,201
 $699
Outside the United States400
 (477) 522

 186
 384
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in income (loss) of affiliates$1,087
 $(198) $2,166
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense$1,310
 $1,387
 $1,083

85



Income tax expense was comprised of the following in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Current:          
Federal$306
 $204
 $520
$347
 $354
 $305
State45
 (1) 61
48
 51
 46
Foreign64
 66
 72
60
 33
 55
415
 269
 653
455
 438
 406
Deferred:          
Federal(21) 26
 86
65
 (275) (22)
State1
 (3) 11
10
 (26) 1
Foreign3
 (23) (8)(27) 4
 3
(17) 
 89
48
 (297) (18)
Income tax expense$398
 $269
 $742
$503
 $141
 $388


90


Deferred taxes are the result of differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the following ($ in millions):
February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Accrued property expenses$162
 $194
$175
 $129
Other accrued expenses133
 119
78
 91
Deferred revenue81
 153
99
 93
Compensation and benefits114
 95
99
 103
Stock-based compensation110
 137
86
 94
Goodwill and intangibles253
 287
Loss and credit carryforwards176
 266
133
 156
Other103
 125
86
 88
Total deferred tax assets879
 1,089
1,009
 1,041
Valuation allowance(158) (228)(108) (143)
Total deferred tax assets after valuation allowance721
 861
901
 898
Property and equipment(286) (343)(296) (251)
Goodwill and intangibles(75) (127)
Inventory(60) (90)(69) (54)
Other(16) (22)(26) (27)
Total deferred tax liabilities(437) (582)(391) (332)
Net deferred tax assets$284
 $279
$510
 $566

Deferred tax assets and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows ($ in millions):
 February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013
Other current assets$261
 $228
Other assets44
 66
Other current liabilities
 (5)
Other long-term liabilities(21) (10)
Net deferred tax assets$284
 $279
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Other assets$510
 $574
Long-term liabilities held for sale
 (8)
Net deferred tax assets$510
 $566

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we early adopted ASU 2015-17, which requires that all deferred taxes be presented as non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further information regarding this balance sheet reclassification.

At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, we had total net operating loss carryforwards from international operations of $12596 million, of which $11789 million will expire in various years through 20242036 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. Additionally, we had acquired

86


U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $2319 million which expire between 2023 and 2030, U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $121 million which expire between 20222023 and 20232026, state credit carryforwards of $12$13 million which expire in 2023,2024, and state capital loss carryforwards of $4 million which expire in 2019.

At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, a valuation allowance of $158108 million had been established, of which $111 million is against U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards, $139 million is against U.S. federal and state capital loss carryforwards, $3$8 million is against state credit carryforwards and other state deferred tax assets, and $13190 million is against certain international net operating loss carryforwards and other international deferred tax assets. The $7035 million decrease from February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, is primarily due to the decrease in the valuation allowance against the U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforward and international net operating loss carryforwards, partially offset by the increase in valuation allowances against federal and state capital loss carryforwards and state credit carryforwards.

We have not provided deferred taxes on unremitted earnings attributable to foreign operations that have been considered to be reinvested indefinitely. These earnings relate to ongoing operations and were $1.4 billion896 million at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016. It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested.


91


The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Balance at beginning of period$383
 $387
 $359
$410
 $370
 $383
Gross increases related to prior period tax positions38
 10
 69
30
 33
 38
Gross decreases related to prior period tax positions(67) (22) (35)(13) (88) (67)
Gross increases related to current period tax positions34
 37
 43
59
 114
 34
Settlements with taxing authorities(3) (10) (20)(9) (9) (3)
Lapse of statute of limitations(15) (19) (29)(8) (10) (15)
Balance at end of period$370
 $383
 $387
$469
 $410
 $370

Unrecognized tax benefits of $228337 million, $231297 million and $239$228 million at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, and March 3, 2012,February 1, 2014, respectively, would favorably impact our effective income tax rate if recognized.

We recognize interest and penalties (not included in the "unrecognized tax benefits" above), as well as interest received from favorable tax settlements, as components of income tax expense. Interest expense of $810 million and penalties expense of $2 million werewas recognized in fiscal 20142016. At February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, and March 3, 2012,February 1, 2014, we had accrued interest of $9189 million, $8578 million and $79$91 million, respectively, along with accrued penalties of $1 million, $2 million $0 million and $0$2 million at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, February 2, 2013January 31, 2015, and March 3, 2012,February 1, 2014, respectively.

We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 2005.

Because existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for us for unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months, and since we are routinely under audit by various taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change during the next 12 months. An estimate of the amount or range of such change cannot be made at this time. However, we do not expect the change, if any, to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows within the next 12 months.

12.11.   Segment and Geographic Information
 
Segment Information
 
Our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is our Chief Executive Officer. Our business is organized into two reportable segments: Domestic (which is comprised of all operations within the U.S. and its territories) and International (which is comprised of all operations outside the U.S. and its districts and territories). Our CODM has ultimate responsibility for enterprise decisions. Our CODM determines, in particular, resource allocation for, and monitors performance of, the consolidated enterprise, the Domestic segment and the International segment. The Domestic segment managers and International segment managers have responsibility for operating decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance

87


within their respective segments. Our CODM relies on internal management reporting that analyzes enterprise results to the net earnings level and segment results to the operating income level.
 
We do not aggregate our Canada and Mexico businesses into one International operating segments, so oursegment. Our Domestic and International operating segments also represent our reportable segments. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.


9288

Table of Contents

The following tables present our business segment information in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Revenue          
Domestic$35,831
 $33,222
 $37,596
$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
International6,579
 6,605
 7,861
3,163
 4,284
 4,780
Total revenue$42,410
 $39,827
 $45,457
$39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Percentage of revenue, by revenue category          
Domestic:          
Consumer Electronics30% 34% 36%32% 31% 30%
Computing and Mobile Phones48% 44% 40%46% 47% 48%
Entertainment8% 9% 12%8% 9% 8%
Appliances7% 6% 5%8% 7% 7%
Services6% 6% 6%5% 5% 6%
Other1% 1% 1%1% 1% 1%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
International:          
Consumer Electronics28% 31% 34%31% 30% 29%
Computing and Mobile Phones40% 39% 36%48% 49% 50%
Entertainment7% 8% 8%9% 9% 10%
Appliances20% 17% 17%5% 5% 5%
Services5% 5% 5%6% 6% 6%
Other< 1%
 < 1%
 < 1%
1% 1% < 1%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
Operating income (loss)          
Domestic$1,145
 $731
 $1,964
$1,585
 $1,437
 $1,145
International(1)
(5) (850) 236
Total operating income (loss)1,140
 (119) 2,200
International(210) 13
 (1)
Total operating income1,375
 1,450
 1,144
Other income (expense)          
Gain on sale of investments20
 
 55
2
 13
 20
Investment income and other27
 20
 22
13
 14
 19
Interest expense(100) (99) (111)(80) (90) (100)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in income (loss) of affiliates$1,087
 $(198) $2,166
Assets     
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense$1,310
 $1,387
 $1,083
Assets(1)(2)
     
Domestic$11,146
 $10,874
 $9,592
$12,318
 $12,987
 $11,123
International2,867
 5,913
 6,413
1,201
 2,258
 2,867
Total assets$14,013
 $16,787
 $16,005
$13,519
 $15,245
 $13,990
Capital expenditures     
Capital expenditures(2)
     
Domestic$440
 $488
 $488
$602
 $519
 $440
International107
 217
 278
47
 42
 107
Total capital expenditures$547
 $705
 $766
$649
 $561
 $547
Depreciation     
Depreciation(2)
     
Domestic$565
 $561
 $612
$613
 $575
 $565
International136
 233
 267
44
 81
 136
Total depreciation$701
 $794
 $879
$657
 $656
 $701
(1)Included within
For fiscal 2015 and 2014, assets are recast to present our retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-17 Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, ASU 2015-03 Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and ASU 2015-15 Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities.
(2)For fiscal 2015 and 2014, the International segment's operating losssegment amounts for fiscal 2013 (11-month) is a $819 million goodwill impairment charge.assets, capital expenditures and depreciation include amounts from Five Star.

9389

Table of Contents

Geographic Information

The following table presents our geographic information in fiscal 20142016, 20132015 (11-month) and 20122014 ($ in millions):
12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
2014 2013 20122016 2015 2014
Net sales to customers          
United States$35,831
 $33,222
 $37,596
$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
Canada4,522
 4,818
 5,635
2,917
 4,047
 4,522
China1,806
 1,574
 2,069
Other251
 213
 157
246
 237
 258
Total revenue$42,410
 $39,827
 $45,457
$39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Long-lived assets          
United States$2,190
 $2,404
 $2,507
$2,189
 $2,100
 $2,190
Europe
 352
 352
Canada244
 341
 432
140
 174
 244
China139
 142
 161

 
 139
Other25
 31
 19
17
 21
 25
Total long-lived assets$2,598
 $3,270
 $3,471
$2,346
 $2,295
 $2,598

13.12.   Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings. Where appropriate, we have made accruals with respect to these matters, which are reflected in our consolidated financial statements. However, there are cases where liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated and therefore accruals have not been made. We provide disclosure of matters where we believe it is reasonably possible the impact may be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Securities Actions
 
In February 2011, a purported class action lawsuit captioned, IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., was filed against us and certain of our executive officers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. This federal court action alleges, among other things, that we and the officers named in the complaint violated Sections 10(b) and 20A of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act in connection with press releases and other statements relating to our fiscal 2011 earnings guidance that had been made available to the public. Additionally, in March 2011, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Rene LeBlanc, against us and certain of our executive officers in the same court. In July 2011, after consolidation of the IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund and Rene LeBlanc actions, a consolidated complaint captioned, IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., was filed and served. We filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in September 2011, and in March 2012, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2012, the court issued a decision dismissing the action with prejudice. In April 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or amend the court's decision on our motion to dismiss. In October 2012, the court granted plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the court's decision on our motion to dismiss in part by vacating such decision and giving plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, which plaintiff did in October 2012. We filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in November 2012 and all responsive pleadings were filed in December 2012. A hearing was held on April 26, 2013. On August 5, 2013, the court issued an order granting our motion to dismiss in part and, contrary to its March 2012 order, denying the motion to dismiss in part, holding that certain of the statements alleged to have been made were not forward-looking statements and therefore were not subject to the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). Plaintiffs moved to certify the purported class. By Order filed August 6, 2014, the court certified a class of persons or entities who acquired Best Buy common stock between 10:00 a.m. EDT on September 14, 2010, and December 13, 2010, and who were damaged by the alleged violations of law. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted our request for interlocutory appeal. Oral argument was held in October 2015, and we await a decision. The trial court has stayed proceedings while the appeal is pending. We continue to believe that these allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend our company in this matter.
 
In June 2011, a purported shareholder derivative action captioned, Salvatore M. Talluto, Derivatively and on Behalf of Best Buy Co., Inc. v. Richard M. Schulze, et al., as Defendants and Best Buy Co., Inc. as Nominal Defendant, was filed against both present and former members of our Board of Directors serving during the relevant periods in fiscal 2011 and us as a nominal

9490

Table of Contents

defendant in the U.S. District Court for the State of Minnesota. The lawsuit alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duty, among other claims, including violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, in failing to correct public misrepresentations and material misstatements and/or omissions regarding our fiscal 2011 earnings projections and, for certain directors, selling stock while in possession of material adverse non-public information. Additionally, in July 2011, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Daniel Himmel, against us and certain of our executive officers in the same court. In November 2011, the respective lawsuits of Salvatore M. Talluto and Daniel Himmel were consolidated into a new action captioned, In Re: Best Buy Co., Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, and a stay ordered until after a final resolutionpending the close of the motion to dismissdiscovery in the consolidated IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. case. Additionally, in June 2015, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Khuong Tran, derivatively on behalf of Best Buy Co., Inc. against us and certain of our executive officers and directors in the same court. The Tran lawsuit has also been stayed pending the close of discovery in IBEW.

The plaintiffs in the above securities actions seek damages, including interest, equitable relief and reimbursement of the costs and expenses they incurred in the lawsuits. As stated above, we believe the allegations in the above securities actions are without merit, and we intend to defend these actions vigorously. Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the claims in the above securities actions, their respective procedural litigation history, and the degree to which we intend to defend our company in these matters, the amount or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, cannot be estimated.

Trade Secrets Action

In February 2011, a lawsuit captioned Techforward, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et. al. was filed against us in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California. The case alleges that we implemented our “Buy Back Plan” in February 2011 using trade secrets misappropriated from plaintiff's buyback plan that were disclosed to us during business relationship discussions and also breached both an agreement for a limited marketing test of plaintiff's buyback plan and a non-disclosure agreement related to the business discussions. In November 2012, a jury found we were unjustly enriched through misappropriation of trade secrets and awarded plaintiff $22 million. The jury also found that although we breached the subject contracts, plaintiff suffered no resulting damage. In December 2012, the court further awarded the plaintiff $5 million in exemplary damages and granted plaintiff's motion for $6 million in attorney fees and costs. We believe that the jury verdict and court awards are inconsistent with the law and the evidence offered at trial or otherwise in error. Accordingly, we appealed the resulting judgment and awards in February 2013 and intend to vigorously contest these decisions.

LCDCathode Ray Tube Action

On October 8, 2010,November 14, 2011, we filed a lawsuit captioned Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al.In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We allege that the defendants engaged in price fixing in violation of antitrust regulations and conspiredrelating to controlcathode ray tubes for the supplytime period between March 1, 1995 through November 25, 2007. No trial date has been set. In connection with this action, we received settlement proceeds net of TFT-LCD panels. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we entered into binding settlement agreements with multiple defendants. Under the terms of the settlement agreements, we will receive specified payments in accordance with specified schedules, and there are no performance obligations or other contingencies associated with our right to receive the specified payments. Settlement proceeds of $264 million were recognized during the second quarter in cost of goods sold. In addition, associated legal expenses of $35 million were recorded in SG&A. As of February 1, 2014, $176 million of the gross settlement proceeds had been received, with the remaining $88 million recorded as short-term or long-term receivables.

On July 22, 2013, trial commenced against the remaining named defendants. On September 3, 2013, a jury found that HannStar Display, Co. knowingly participated in a conspiracy to fix prices for TFT-LCD panels and found damagescosts in the amount of $7.5 million. In addition,
 $75 million during fiscal 2016. We will continue to litigate against the jury foundremaining defendants and expect that Toshiba Corp. did not knowingly participate in the alleged conspiracy. We are considering all options in regard to the verdict, but we currently do not expect to receive amounts in addition to the settlements reached in the current and prior fiscal years.further settlement discussions will occur as this matter proceeds .

Other Legal Proceedings
 
We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of conducting business. For such legal proceedings, we have accrued an amount that reflects the aggregate liability deemed probable and estimable, but this amount is not material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Because of the preliminary nature of many of these proceedings, the difficulty in ascertaining the applicable facts relating to many of these proceedings, the variable treatment of claims made in many of these proceedings and the difficulty of predicting the settlement value of many of these proceedings, we are not able to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible additional losses. However, based upon our historical experience, the resolution of these proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

95


Commitments

We engage Accenture LLP ("Accenture") to assist us with improving our operational capabilities and reducing our costs in the information systems and human resources areas. WeOur contract with Accenture ends during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and we expect our future contractual obligationsthe spending to Accenturetotal $95 million up to range from $21 million to $106 million per year through 2018, the end of the periods under contract.

We had outstanding letters of credit and bankers' acceptances for purchase obligations with an aggregate fair value of $512$89 million at February 1, 2014.

At February 1, 2014, we did not have any material commitments for the purchase, construction or lease of facilities or future locations.

January 30, 2016.
14.

91


13.   Supplementary Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables show selected operating results for each 3-month quarter and full year of fiscal 20142016 and 20132015 (11-month)(unaudited) ($ in millions):
Quarter 12-MonthQuarter 12-Month
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 20141st 2nd 3rd 4th 2016
Revenue$9,347
 $9,266
 $9,327
 $14,470
 $42,410
$8,558
 $8,528
 $8,819
 $13,623
 $39,528
Comparable store sales % change(1)
(1.4)% (0.6)% 0.3% (1.2)% (0.8)%
Comparable sales % change(1)
0.6 % 3.8% 0.8% (1.7)% 0.5 %
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(5)
(0.7)% 2.7% 0.5% (1.8)% (0.1)%
Gross profit$2,158
 $2,458
 $2,157
 $2,917
 $9,690
$2,030
 $2,098
 $2,112
 $2,951
 $9,191
Operating income(2)
168
 413
 90
 469
 1,140
86
 288
 230
 771
 1,375
Net earnings from continuing operations97
 237
 44
 311
 689
37
 164
 129
 477
 807
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(170) 11
 10
 (17) (166)92
 
 (4) 2
 90
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests(73) 248
 54
 294
 523
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders(81) 266
 54
 293
 532
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests129
 164
 125
 479
 897
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders129
 164
 125
 479
 897
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(3)
                  
Continuing operations$0.29
 $0.69
 $0.12
 $0.88
 $1.98
$0.10
 $0.46
 $0.37
 $1.39
 $2.30
Discontinued operations(0.53) 0.08
 0.04
 (0.05) (0.45)0.26
 
 (0.01) 0.01
 0.26
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$(0.24) $0.77
 $0.16
 $0.83
 $1.53
Diluted earnings per share$0.36
 $0.46
 $0.36
 $1.40
 $2.56

Quarter 11-MonthQuarter 12-Month
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 
2013(4)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2015
Revenue$10,343
 $9,306
 $9,343
 $14,921
 $39,827
$8,639
 $8,459
 $9,032
 $14,209
 $40,339
Comparable store sales % decline(1)
(5.2)% (3.3)% (5.1)% (1.4)% (3.4)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
(1.8)% (2.2)% 2.9% 2.0% 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(5)(6)
(1.8)% (2.2)% 2.2% 1.3% %
Gross profit$2,572
 $2,249
 $2,213
 $3,331
 $9,298
$1,967
 $1,978
 $2,076
 $3,026
 $9,047
Operating income (loss)(5)
263
 87
 
 (181) (119)
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations169
 30
 (9) (460) (467)
Operating income(4)
210
 225
 205
 810
 1,450
Net earnings from continuing operations469
 137
 116
 524
 1,246
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(17) (37) 10
 81
 47
(8) 10
 (9) (4) (11)
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests152
 (7) 1
 (379) (420)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders158
 12
 (10) (409) (441)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests461
 147
 107
 520
 1,235
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders461
 146
 107
 519
 1,233
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(3)
                  
Continuing operations$0.49
 $0.09
 $(0.03) $(1.36) $(1.38)$1.33
 $0.39
 $0.33
 $1.47
 $3.53
Discontinued operations(0.03) (0.05) 
 0.15
 0.08
(0.02) 0.03
 (0.03) (0.01) (0.04)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$0.46
 $0.04
 $(0.03) $(1.21) $(1.30)
Diluted earnings per share$1.31
 $0.42
 $0.30
 $1.46
 $3.49
Note: Certain fiscal year totals may not add due to rounding.

96

Table of Contents

(1)
Comprised ofOur comparable sales calculation compares revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to call centers, websites and ourcertain other comparable sales channels. Revenue we earn from sales of merchandisechannels for a particular period to wholesalers or dealers is generally not included within our comparable store sales calculation.a corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated, as well as remodeled, expanded and expandeddownsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from our comparable store sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquired storesAcquisitions are included in ourthe comparable store sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portion of ourthe calculation of the comparable store sales percentage change attributable to our International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The calculation of comparable sales excludes the impact of revenue from discontinued operations. Comparable online sales are included in our comparable sales calculation. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable store sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods. The calculation of comparable store sales excludes the impact of the extra week of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, as well as revenue from discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(2)
Includes $6186 million, $(4) million, $7 million, $31 million and $11512 million of restructuring charges recorded in the fiscal first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, and $159201 million for the 12 months ended February 1, 2014,January 30, 2016 related to measures we took to restructure our businesses.

92

Table of Contents

(3)The sum of our quarterly diluted earnings per share does not equal our annual diluted earnings per share due to the impact of the timing of the repurchases of common stock and stock option exercises ondifferences in quarterly and annual weighted-average shares outstanding.
(4)On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a change to our fiscal year-end from the Saturday nearest the end of February to the Saturday nearest the end of January. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month), we began reporting our quarterly results on the basis of our new fiscal year-end. As such, the results for the month of February 2012, which are included in the audited results for fiscal 2012, were also included in the reported first quarter of fiscal 2013 (11-month). However, the results for the month of February 2012 are not included in the results for the full year of fiscal 2013 (11-month). Thus, the four quarters of fiscal year 2013 (11-month) are not additive.
(5)
Includes $127$2 million, $915 million, $345 million and $169(7) million of restructuring charges recorded in the fiscal first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, and $415$5 million for the 1112 months ended February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015 related to measures we took to restructure our businesses. Also included
(5)Represents comparable sales excluding the estimated revenue of installment billing.
(6)Enterprise comparable sales for fiscal 2015 include revenue from continuing operations in the International segment. Excluding the International segment, Enterprise comparable sales, excluding the impact of installment billing, would have been (1.3%) in the first quarter, 2.0% in the second quarter, 2.4% in the third quarter, 0.5% in the fourth quarter and 11 months ended February 2, 2013, is a $822 million goodwill impairment charge related0.5% for fiscal 2015, or equal to our Canada, Five Star and U.S. reporting units.Domestic comparable sales excluding the impact of installment billing, for the same periods.

9793

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We have established a Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain members of management, to assist in this evaluation. Our Disclosure Committee meets on a quarterly basis and more often if necessary.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management's report on our internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The attestation report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal fourth quarter ended February 1, 2014January 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

There was no information required to be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that was not reported.


9894

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors

The information provided under the caption "Nominees and Directors" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers

Information regarding our executive officers is furnished in a separate item captioned "Executive Officers of the Registrant" included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

The nature of certain relationships and related party transactions between any director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director is stated under the captions "Nominees and Directors" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Audit Committee Financial Expert and Identification of the Audit Committee

The information provided under the caption "Audit Committee Report" in the Proxy Statement, regarding the Audit Committee financial experts and the identification of the Audit Committee members, is incorporated herein by reference.

Director Nomination Process

The information provided under the caption "Director Nomination Process" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information provided under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Business Ethics that applies to our directors and all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer. Our Code of Business Ethics is available on our website, www.investors.bestbuy.com — select the "Corporate Governance" link..

A copy of our Code of Business Ethics may also be obtained, without charge, upon written request to Best Buy Co., Inc. Investor Relations Department at 7601 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423-3645.

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer by posting such information within two business days of any such amendment or waiver on our website, www.investors.bestbuy.com — select the "Corporate Governance" link..

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information set forth under the caption "Executive and Director Compensation" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


99

Table of Contents

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans


95

Table of Contents

Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is furnished as a separate item captioned "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information provided under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information provided under the captions "Director Independence," "Nominees and Directors" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information provided under the caption "Ratification of Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Principal Accountant Services and Fees" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


10096

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.Financial Statements:

All financial statements as set forth under Item 8 of this report.

2.Supplementary Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Other schedules have not been included because they are not applicable or because the information is included elsewhere in this report.

3.Exhibits:

Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1
 Implementation Agreement, dated April 29, 2013, by and among Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy UK Holdings LP, Best Buy Distributions Limited, New BBED Limited and Carphone Warehouse Group plc 8-K 2.1
 4/30/2013  
3.1
 Restated Articles of Incorporation DEF 14A n/a
 5/12/2009  
3.2
 Amended and Restated By-Laws 8-K 3.1
 9/26/2013  
4.1
 Form of Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee S-3ASR 4.1
 3/11/2011  
4.2
 Form of First Supplemental Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.2
 3/11/2011  
4.3
 Second Supplement Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2013, to the Indenture dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.1
 7/16/2013  
10.1
 364-Day Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2013, among Best Buy Co., Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K 10.1
 6/28/2013  
10.2
 Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of October 7, 2011, among Best Buy Co., Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K 4.2
 10/12/2011  
10.3
 First Amendment, dated as of June 25, 2013, to the Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2011, among Best Buy Co. Inc., The Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K 10.2
 6/28/2013  
*10.4
 1994 Full-Time Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended 10-K 10.1
 5/2/2007  
*10.5
 1997 Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended 10-Q 10.1
 10/6/2005  
*10.6
 1997 Directors' Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended 10-K 10.3
 5/2/2007  
*10.7
 2000 Restricted Stock Award Plan, as amended 10-Q 10.2
 10/6/2005  
Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1
 Implementation Agreement, dated April 29, 2013, by and among Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy UK Holdings LP, Best Buy Distributions Limited, New BBED Limited and Carphone Warehouse Group, plc 8-K 2.1
 4/30/2013  
3.1
 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation DEF 14A n/a
 5/12/2009  
3.2
 Amended and Restated By-Laws 8-K 3.1
 9/26/2013  
4.1
 Form of Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee S-3ASR 4.1
 3/8/2011  
4.2
 Form of First Supplemental Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.2
 3/11/2011  
4.3
 Second Supplement Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2013, to the Indenture dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.1
 7/16/2013  
10.1
 Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014, among Best Buy Co., Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K 10.1
 7/2/2014  
*10.2
 Best Buy Co., Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended S-8 99
 7/15/2011  
*10.3
 Best Buy Co., Inc. Short Term Incentive Plan, as approved by the Board of Directors DEF 14A n/a
 5/26/2011  
*10.4
 2010 Long-Term Incentive Program Award Agreement, as approved by the Board of Directors 10-K 10.7
 4/28/2010  
*10.5
 Form of Long-Term Incentive Program Buy-Out Award Agreement dated September 4, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc. 10-Q 10.3
 9/6/2012  
*10.6
 Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Continuity Award Agreement dated June 21, 2012 10-Q 10.1
 9/6/2012  
*10.7
 Employment Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, between Sharon McCollam and Best Buy Co., Inc. 8-K 10.1
 11/15/2012  
*10.8
 Employment Agreement, dated August 19, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc. 8-K 10.1
 8/21/2012  
*10.9
 Letter Agreement, dated March 25, 2013, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and Richard M. Schulze 8-K 99.2
 3/25/2013  

10197

Table of Contents

Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
*10.8
Best Buy Co., Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amendedS-899
7/15/2011
*10.9
Best Buy Co., Inc. Short Term Incentive Plan, as approved by the Board of DirectorsDEF 14An/a
5/26/2011
*10.10
2010 Long-Term Incentive Program Award Agreement, as approved by the Board of Directors10-K10.7
4/28/2010
*10.11
Best Buy Fifth Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, as amendedS-84.3
11/19/2013
*10.12
Best Buy Co., Inc. Performance Share Award Agreement dated August 5, 20088-K10.1
8/8/2008
*10.13
Form of Long-Term Incentive Program Buy-Out Award Agreement dated September 4, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc.10-Q10.3
9/6/2012
*10.14
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Continuity Award Agreement dated June 21, 201210-Q10.1
9/6/2012
*10.15
Employment Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, between Sharon McCollam and Best Buy Co., Inc.8-K10.1
11/15/2012
*10.16
Employment Agreement, dated August 19, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc.8-K10.1
8/21/2012
*10.17
Letter Agreement, dated March 25, 2013, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and Richard M. Schulze8-K99.2
3/25/2013
*10.18
 Best Buy Mobile Performance Award Termination Agreement 10-K10.18
3/28/2014  X
*10.1910.11
 Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program Award 10-K10.19
3/28/2014  X
*10.2010.12
 Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement 10-K10.20
3/28/2014  X
*10.2110.13
 Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-U.S. Directors 10-K10.21
3/28/2014  
*10.14
 Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (2014)10-Q10.1
12/5/2014  
X*10.15
Best Buy Co., Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive PlanS-899
6/27/2014
*10.16
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2014)10-Q10.1
9/10/2014
*10.17
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-U.S. Directors (2014)10-Q10.2
9/10/2014
*10.18
Best Buy Sixth Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan10-K10.19
3/31/2015
*10.19
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program Award Agreement for Directors (2015)10-Q10.1
9/4/2015
*10.20
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program Award Agreement for Non-U.S. Directors (2015)10-Q10.2
9/4/2015
12.1
 Statements re: Computation of Ratios    
   X
21.1
 Subsidiaries of the Registrant    
   X
23.1
 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP    
   X
31.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    
   X
31.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    
   X
32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    
   X
32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    
   X

102

Table of Contents

ExhibitIncorporated by ReferenceFiled
No.Exhibit DescriptionFormExhibitFiling DateHerewith
101
 The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2014,2016, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014,23, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the consolidated balance sheets at February 1, 2014January 30, 2016 and February 2, 2013,January 31, 2015, (ii) the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 (recast) and March 3, 2012, (iii) the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, (iv) the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 (recast) and March 3, 2012, (v) the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014 February 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.        

*    Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has not filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K certain instruments with respect to long-term debt under which the amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant. The registrant hereby agrees to furnish copies of all such instruments to the SEC upon request.

The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents

98

Table of Contents

were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.


10399

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Best Buy Co., Inc.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Hubert Joly
  
Hubert Joly
PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer
  March 28, 201423, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Title Date
/s/ Hubert Joly President,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Hubert Joly (principal executive officer)  
     
/s/ Sharon L. McCollam Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer March 28, 201423, 2016
Sharon L. McCollam 
 (principal financial officerofficer)
/s/ Mathew R. WatsonVice President, Finance - Controller and Chief Accounting OfficerMarch 23, 2016
Mathew R. Watson
(principal accounting officer)
  
     
/s/ Bradbury H. Anderson Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Bradbury H. Anderson    
     
/s/ Lisa M. Caputo Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Lisa M. Caputo
/s/ J. Patrick DoyleDirectorMarch 23, 2016
J. Patrick Doyle    
     
/s/ Russell P. Fradin Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Russell P. Fradin    
     
/s/ Kathy J. Higgins Victor Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Kathy J. Higgins Victor    
     
/s/ David W. Kenny Director March 28, 201423, 2016
David W. Kenny    
     
/s/ Sanjay KhoslaKaren McLoughlin Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Sanjay Khosla
/s/ Allen U. LenzmeierDirectorMarch 28, 2014
Allen U. LenzmeierKaren McLoughlin    
     
/s/ Thomas L. Millner Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Thomas L. Millner    
     
/s/ Hatim A. TyabjiClaudia F. Munce Chairman of the Board and Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Hatim A. TyabjiClaudia F. Munce    
     
/s/ Gérard Vittecoq Director March 28, 201423, 2016
Gérard Vittecoq    


104100

Table of Contents

Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
($ in millions)
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts
 
Other(1)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts
 
Other(1)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Year ended January 30, 2016       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$59
 $30
 $(40) $49
Year ended January 31, 2015       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$104
 $1
 $(46) $59
Year ended February 1, 2014              
Allowance for doubtful accounts$92
 $76
 $(64) $104
$92
 $76
 $(64) $104
Year ended February 2, 2013       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$72
 $34
 $(14) $92
Year ended March 3, 2012       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$107
 $8
 $(43) $72
(1)Includes bad debt write-offs and recoveries, acquisitions and the effect of foreign currency fluctuations.


101