UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016February 3, 2018
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                           to                             
Commission file number 1-9595


BEST BUY CO., INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota 41-0907483
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
7601 Penn Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota
 
55423
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)  
Registrant's telephone number, including area code 612-291-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $.10 per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
Emerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) o Yes x No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 1, 2015,July 28, 2017, was approximately $6.6$13.0 billion, computed by reference to the price of $32.29$57.64 per share, the price at which the common equity was last sold on August 1, 2015,July 28, 2017, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange-Composite Index. (For purposes of this calculation all of the registrant's directors and executive officers are deemed affiliates of the registrant.)
As of March 21, 2016,29, 2018, the registrant had 323,347,681282,713,593 shares of its Common Stock issued and outstanding.





DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement relating to is 2016its 2018 Regular Meeting of Shareholders ("Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), provide a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their companies. With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements and may be identified by the use of words such as "anticipate," "assume," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "foresee," "outlook," "plan," "project,""project" and other words and terms of similar meaning. Such statements reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. A variety of factors could cause our future results to differ materially from the anticipated results expressed in such forward-looking statements. Readers should review Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements.




BEST BUY    FISCAL    20162018    FORM    10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS







PART I

Item 1.  Business.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms "we," "us" and "our" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refersrefer to Best Buy Co., Inc. and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries. Any references to our website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites.

Description of Business

We were incorporated in the state of Minnesota in 1966. Today, we are a leading provider of technology products, services and solutions. We offer these products and services to the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have retail operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Information About Our Segments and Geographic Areas

We have two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of the operations in all states, districts and territories of the U.S., under various brand names including Best Buy, bestbuy.com, Best Buy Mobile, Best Buy Direct, Best Buy Express, Geek Squad, Magnolia Home Theater and Pacific Kitchen and Home.

The International segment is comprised of all operations in Canada and Mexico under the brand names Best Buy, bestbuy.com.ca, bestbuy.com.mx, Best Buy Express, Best Buy Mobile, Geek Squad and Geek Squad.the domain names bestbuy.ca and bestbuy.com.mx.

In March 2015, we decided to consolidate Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores and converting 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand.

On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to close all of our 257 remaining Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in the U.S. We expect the majority of these stores to close during the half of fiscal 2019. Additional information on these changes is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In fiscal 2007, we acquired a 75% interest in Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Ltd. (“Five Star”), one of China’s largest appliance and consumer electronics retailers. In fiscal 2009, we acquired the remaining 25% interest in Five Star. On December 3, 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell Five Star, and we completed the sale on February 13, 2015. In fiscal 2009, we acquired a 50% interest in Best Buy Europe Distributions Limited (“Best Buy Europe”), a venture with Carphone Warehouse Group plc (“CPW”). On June 26, 2013, we sold our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe to CPW.

Financial information about our segments and geographic areas is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 11, Segment and Geographic Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Operations

Our Domestic and International segments are managed by leadership teams responsible for all areas of the business. Both segments operate an omni-channela multi-channel platform that providesallows customers the ability to shop when and where they want.

Domestic Segment

Development of merchandise and services offerings, pricing and promotions, procurement and supply chain, online and mobile application operations, marketing and advertising and labor deployment across all channels are centrally managed at our corporate headquarters.managed. In addition, support capabilities (for example, human resources, finance and real estate management) are generally performed at our corporate headquarters. We also have field operations that support retail teams.teams from our corporate headquarters and regional locations. Our retail stores have procedures for inventory management, asset protection, transaction processing, customer relations, store administration, product sales and services, staff training and merchandise display that are largely standardized within each store brand. All stores within each store brand generally operate under standard procedures with a degree of flexibility for store management to address certain local market characteristics.

International Segment


4


Our Canada and Mexico store operations are similar to those in our Domestic segment.

In March 2015, we decided to consolidate Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores and converting 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand.

Merchandise and Services

Our Domestic and International segments have offerings in six revenue categories: Consumer Electronics, Computing and Mobile Phones, Entertainment, Appliances, Services and Other. The key components of each revenue category are as follows:

4




Consumer Electronics - home theater, home automation, digital imaging, health and fitness, home automation, home theater and portable audio;audio (including headphones, portable speakers and voice assistants);
Computing and Mobile Phones - computing and peripherals, networking, tablets,e-readers, mobile phones (including related mobile network carrier commissions), networking, tablets and wearables (including smart watches) and e-readers;smartwatches);
Entertainment - drones, gaming hardware and software, movies, music, technology toys, virtual reality and other software;
Appliances - major appliances (for example, refrigeration, dishwashers, laundry, ovens, laundry,refrigerators, etc.) and small appliances (for example, blenders, coffee makers, blenders, etc.);
Services - consultation, delivery, design, delivery,educational classes, installation, set-up,memberships, protection plans, repair, set-up and technical support and educational classes;support; and
Other - beverages, snacks, beveragessundry items and other sundry items.product offerings within our International segment (including baby, luggage and sporting goods).

Distribution

Domestic Segment

U.S. Best Buy online merchandise sales are typically either picked up at U.S. Best Buy stores or delivered directly to customers from a distribution center or retail store. TheOur ship-from-store capability allows us to improve product availability and delivery times for customers. Most merchandise is shipped directly from manufacturers to our distribution centers or warehouses located throughout the U.S. In order to meet release dates for certain products, merchandise may be shipped directly to our stores from suppliers.

International Segment

Our distribution model for Canada and Mexico distribution model is similar to that of our Domestic segment model.

Suppliers and Inventory

Our Domestic and International segments purchase merchandise from a variety of suppliers. In fiscal 2016,2018, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 75%70% of the merchandise we purchased, with five suppliers – Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Sony and LG ElectronicsLenovo – representing approximately 51%56% of total merchandise purchased. We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our major suppliersvendors that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise or that secure any other terms.of the key terms of our arrangements.

We carefully monitor and manage our inventory levels in an effort to match quantities on hand with consumer demand as closely as possible. Key elements to our inventory management process include the following: continuous monitoring of historical and projected consumer demand, continuous monitoring and adjustment of inventory receipt levels, agreements with vendors relating to reimbursement for the cost of markdowns or sales incentives and agreements with vendors relating to return privileges for certain products.

We also have a global sourcing operation to design, develop, test and contract-manufacture our exclusive brand products.

Store Development

We had approximately 1,200 large-format and 400300 small-format stores at the end of fiscal 20162018 throughout our Domestic and International segments. Our stores are a vital component of our omni-channelmulti-channel strategy and representwe believe they are an important competitive advantage. In the U.S., weWe have the ability to ship from all of our Best Buy stores.stores in the U.S. and all of our large-format stores in Canada. Customers may also elect to pick up orders initiated online in any of our stores. In recent years,Beginning in 2013, we have opened vendor store-within-a-store concepts to allow closer vendor partnership and a betterhigher quality customer experience. In fiscal 20172019 and beyond, we will continue to look for opportunities to optimize our store space, renegotiatingrenegotiate leases and selectively openingopen or closingclose locations to support our ongoing transformation.

5



In March 2015, we made a decision to consolidate Future Shop andour remaining Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in permanently closing 66 Future Shop stores and converting 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand.U.S.

Refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for tables reconciling our Domestic and International segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years.


5




Intellectual Property

We own or have the right to use valuable intellectual property such as trademarks, service marks and tradenames, including, but not limited to, Best Buy, Best Buy Mobile, Best Buy Express, Dynex, Future Shop, Geek Squad, Init, Insignia, Magnolia, Modal, My Best Buy, Pacific Sales, Pacific Kitchen and Home, Rocketfish, PlantinumPlatinum and our Yellow Tag logo.

We have secured domestic and international trademark and service mark registrations for many of our brands. We have also secured patents for many of our inventions. We believe our intellectual property has significant value and is an important factor in the marketing of our company, our stores, our products and our websites.

Seasonality

Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. A higherlarge proportion of our revenue and earnings is generated in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Working Capital

We fund our business operations through a combination of available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facilities are available for additional working capital needs, for general corporate purposes and investment and growth opportunities. Our working capital needs typically increase in the months leading up to the holiday shopping season as we purchase inventory in advance of expected sales.

Competition

Our competitors are primarily multi-channel retailers, internet-based businesses, technology service providers, traditional store-based retailers, and vendors and mobile network carriers who offer their products and services directly to customers. We believe our ability to deliver a high qualityhigh-quality customer experience offers us a key competitive advantage. Some of our competitors have lowlower cost operating structures and seek to compete for sales primarily on price. In addition, in the U.S., online-only operators are exempt from collectingnot generally required to collect sales taxes in certain states. We believe this advantage will continue to be eroded as sales tax rules are re-evaluated at both the state and federal levels. We carefully monitor pricing offered by other retailers, and maintaining price competitiveness is one of our ongoing priorities. In addition, we have a price-matching policy in the U.S. that allows customers to request that we match a price offered by certain retail store and online operators. In order to allow this, we are focused on maintaining efficient operations and leveraging the economies of scale available to us through our global vendor partnerships. We believe our dedicated and knowledgeable people, integrated online and retail assets, broad product assortment, strong vendor relationships, range of focused service and support offerings, distinct store formats, brand marketing strategies and supply chain are important ways in which we maintain this advantage.

Environmental Matters

Best Buy is committedWe work hard to positively impactingimpact the environment and our communities. We believe that effectively managingreducing our environmental impacts, settingimpact on the environment via realistic yet assertive sustainability goals and advancing energy-efficient consumer solutions createshelps create long-term value for all of our stakeholders. 
 
We are continuously lookinglook for cost-effective solutions to minimize carbon emissions in our operations. In fiscal year 20162018, we set a new goal to reduce our own carbon emissions by 4560 percent by 2020 (over a 2009 baseline), from both operational reductions and renewable sourcing.sourcing, and we currently expect to meet or exceed this goal.
 
SeeRefer to our Best Buy Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report on our website for further information on environmental performance.

Number of Employees


6


At the end of fiscal 2016,2018, we employed approximately 125,000 full-time, part-time and seasonal employees in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and our sourcing office in China. We consider our employee relations to be good. We offer our employees a wide array of company-paid benefits that vary within our company due to customary local practices and statutory requirements, which we believe are competitive locally and in the aggregate relative to others in our industry.

6




Available Information

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We make available, free of charge on our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these documents with, or furnish them to, the SEC. These documents are posted on our website at www.investors.bestbuy.com. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as the Company,including us, that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

We also make available, free of charge on our website, our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, Amended and Restated By-laws, the Corporate Governance Principles of our Board of Directors ("Board") and our Code of Business Ethics (including any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Ethics) adopted by our Board, as well as the charters of all of our Board's committees: Audit Committee; Compensation and Human Resources Committee; Finance and Investment Policy Committee; and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee. These documents are posted on our website at www.investors.bestbuy.com.

Copies of any of the above-referenced documents will also be made available, free of charge, upon written request to Best Buy Co., Inc. Investor Relations Department at 7601 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423-3645.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Described below are certain risks that we believe apply to our business and the industry in which we operate. You should carefully consider eachEach of the following risk factors should carefully be considered in conjunction with other information provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other public disclosures. The risks described below highlight potential events, trends or other circumstances that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity or access to sources of financing and, consequently, the market value of our common stock and debt instruments. These risks could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results and from guidance we may provide regarding our expectations of future financial performance. The risks described below are not an exhaustive list of all the risks we face. There may be others that we have not identified or that we have deemed to be immaterial. All forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are qualified by the risks described below.

We face strong competition from multi-channel retailers, internet-basede-commerce businesses, technology service providers, traditional store-based retailers and vendors and mobile network carriers whothat offer their products and services directly to customers, which directly affects our revenue and profitability.

The retail businesssector is highly competitive. Price is of great importance to most customers, and price transparency and comparability continues to increase, particularly as a result of digital technology. The ability of consumers to compare prices on a real-time basis puts additional pressure on us to maintain competitive prices. We compete with many other local, regional, national and international retailers and technology service providers, as well as certain of our vendors and mobile network carriers whothat offer products directly to consumers. Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than us, have greater brand recognition and may be able to offer lower prices than us for a sustained period of time. They may also be able to secure better terms from vendors and devote more resources to technology, fulfillment and marketing. Competition may also result from new entrants in the markets we serve, offering products and/or services that compete with us.

The retail industrysector continues to experience a trend towards an increase in sales initiated online and using mobile applications, and some online-only businesses have lower operating costs than us and are not generally required to collect and remit sales taxes in allcertain U.S. states, which can negatively impact the ability of multi-channel retailers to be price competitive on a tax-included basis. Online and multi-channel retailers continue to focus on delivery services, with customers increasingly seeking faster, guaranteed delivery times and low-price or free shipping. Our ability to be competitive on delivery times and delivery costs depends on many factors, and our failure to successfully manage these factors and offer competitive delivery options could negatively impact the demand for our products and our profit margins. Because our business strategy is based on offering superior levels of customer service and a full range of services to complement the products we offer, our cost structure is higher than some of our competitors, and this, in conjunction with price transparency, puts pressure on our margins.

7



As these and related competitive factors evolve, we may experience material adverse pressure on our revenue and profitability.

Consumer electronics
7




Many of the products we sell are highly susceptible to technological advancement, product life cycle fluctuations and changes in consumer preferences.

In general, consumer electronics product life cycles (which begin with initial market launch and conclude with maturity or obsolescence) have become shorter and less predictable. This is largely due to rapid technological advancement and innovation and generally faster adoption by consumers. Consumer preferences have also become susceptible to rapid change, and this adds to the unpredictability of our business. These factors affect us in a number of ways, for example:

the emergence of new products and categories (for example, wearable devices)voice assistants);
the rapid maturity and decline of relatively new categories (for example, tablets);
cannibalization of categories (for example, the effect of smart phonessmartphones on demand for GPS, mobile audio, digital imaging devices, etc.);
increasing demand for internet-based services that may replace physical products such as hard drives, media and entertainment software products;
intense consumer interest in high-profile product updates (for example, smartphone model updates), which concentrates purchasing activity around new launch dates;dates and can often lead to shortages of merchandise;
unpredictable consumer adoption rates (for example, contrasting adoption rates of 3D and Ultra-HD televisions);
rapidly declining price-points in many categories (for example, digital imaging, Ultra-HD televisions, etc.); and
availability of content (for example, Ultra-HD programming, online streaming services, sporting events or other broadcast programming).

The effects of these factors can also be exacerbated by the competitive environment and the ease with which customers can research and compare product features and price.prices. If we fail to interpret, predict and react to these factors in a timely and effective manner, the consequences can include:

not offeringfailure to offer the products and services that our customers want;
having excess inventory, which may require heavy discounting or liquidation;
not securinginability to secure adequate access to brands or products for which consumer demand exceeds supply;
delays in adapting our merchandising, marketing or supply chain capabilities to accommodate changes in product trends; and
damage to our brand and reputation.

These and other similar factors could have a material adverse impact on our revenuesrevenue and profitability.

Our reliance on key vendors and mobile network carriers subjects us to various risks and uncertainties which could affect our revenue and profitability.

We source the products we sell from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. In fiscal 2016,2018, our 20 largest suppliers accounted for approximately 75%70% of the merchandise we purchased (73%(77% in fiscal 2015)2017), with 5 suppliers – Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Sony and LG ElectronicsLenovo – representing approximately 51%56% of total merchandise purchased (47%(53% in fiscal 2015)2017). We generally do not have long-term written contracts with our vendors that would require them to continue supplying us with merchandise or any other terms.merchandise. Our profitability depends on us securing acceptable terms with our vendors for, among other things, the price of merchandise we purchase from them, funding for various forms of promotional programs, payment terms, allocations of merchandise, development of compelling assortments of products, operation of vendor-focused shopping experiences within our stores and terms covering returns and factory warranties. To varying degrees, our vendors may be able to leverage their competitive advantages -- for example, their financial strength, the strength of their brand with customers, their own stores or online channels or their relationships with other retailers -- to our commercial disadvantage, with a consequent adverse impact on our profitability.disadvantage. The potential adverse impact of these factors can be amplified by price transparency (which can limit our flexibility to modify selling prices) and a highly competitive retail environment. Generally, our ability to negotiate favorable terms with our vendors is more difficult with vendors where our purchases represent a smaller proportion of their total revenues, consequently impacting our profitability from such vendor relationships.

We are also dependent on a relatively small number of mobile carriers to allow us to offer mobile devices with carrier connections. The competitive strategies utilized by mobile network carriers can have a material impact on our business. For example, if carriers change the structure of customer contracts, customer upgrade terms, customer qualification requirements, monthly fee plans, cancellation fees or service levels, the volume of upgrades and new contracts we sign with customers may be reduced, adversely affecting our revenuesrevenue and profitability. In addition, our carriers also may serve customers through their own stores, websites, mobile applications and call centers or through other competing retail channels. Carriers may decide to cease allowing us to offer their contracts or certain categories of their contracts, focus their marketing efforts on alternative

8



cease allowing us to offer their contracts, focus their marketing efforts on alternative
channels or make unfavorable changes to our commissions or other terms. Each of these potential factors could have a materiallymaterial adverse impact on our revenue and profitability.

We have internal standards that we require all of our vendors to meet. Our ability to find qualified vendors who meet our standards andcan supply products in a timely and efficient manner that meet our standards of quality and safety can be a challenge,difficult, especially with respect to goods sourced from outside the U.S. Political or financial instability, merchandise quality issues, product safety concerns, cross-border trade restrictions or tariffs, work stoppages, port delays, tariffs, foreign currency exchange rates,rate fluctuations, transportation capacity and costs, inflation, civil unrest, natural disasters, outbreaks of pandemics and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control. Vendors may also fail to invest adequately in design, production or distribution facilities, may reduce their customer incentives, advertising and promotional activities or change their pricing policies. These and other related issues affecting our vendors could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Product safety and quality concerns could have a material adverse impact on our revenue and profitability.

If the products we sell fail to meet applicable safety standards or our customers' expectations regarding safety and quality, we could be exposed to increased legal risk and our reputation may be damaged. Failure to take appropriate actions in relation to product recalls could lead to breaches in laws and regulations and leave us susceptible to government enforcement actions or private litigation. Recalls of products, particularly when combined with lack of available alternatives or our difficulty in sourcing sufficient volumes of replacement products, could also have a material adverse impact on our revenue and profitability.

Our focus on services as a strategic imperativepriority exposes us to certain risks that could have a material adverse impact on our revenue and profitability as well as our reputation.

Our customer promises include provision ofWe offer a full range of services tothat complement our product offerings, including consultation, design, delivery, installation, set-up, protection plans, repair, technical support and educational classes. These services can differentiate us from many of our competitors and provide an opportunity to deliver superior customer service while generating incremental revenue and profit. However, designing,Designing, marketing and executing these services successfully and consistently is subject to incremental risks. These risks include, for example:

increased labor expense to fulfill our customer promises, which may be higher than the related revenue;
increased risk of errors or omissions in the fulfillment of services;
unpredictable warranty failure rates and related expenses;
employees in transit using company vehicles to visit customer locations and employees being present in customer homes; these factorshomes, which may increase our scope of liability;
the potential for increased scope of liability relatedrelating to our employees' actions;managed services offerings;
employees having access to customer devices, including the information held on those devices, which may increase our responsibility for the security of those devices and the data they hold; and
the engagement of third party contractorsparties to assist with some aspects of construction and installation, and the potential responsibility for the actions they take, and for compliance with building codes and related regulations.

In addition, as customers increasingly migrate to websites and mobile applications to initiate transactions, it is inherently more difficult to demonstrate and explain the features and benefits of our service offerings, which can lead to a lower revenue mix of these services. If, for these or other reasons, we fail to design and market services effectively to our customers or fail to meet our customers’ expectations in the execution of these services, our reputation, revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.

Macroeconomic pressures in the U.S. and key international markets in which we operate could adversely affect consumer spending and our financial results.

To varying degrees, our products and services are sensitive to changes in macroeconomic conditions that impact consumer spending. As a result, consumers may be affected in many different ways, including, for example:

whether or not they make a purchase;
their choice of brand, model or price-point;
how frequently they upgrade or replace their devices; and
their appetite for complementary services (for example, protection plans).

ConsumerReal GDP growth, consumer confidence, inflation, employment levels, oil prices, interest rates, tax rates, availability of consumer financing, housing market conditions, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, costs for items such as fuel and

9




food and other macroeconomic trends can adversely affect consumers' demand for the products and services that we offer. Our future results could be significantly adversely impacted by these factors.

Interruptions to our supply chain and other factors affecting our distributionsupply chain, including in-bound deliveries from our vendors, may adversely affect our business.

Our supply chain is a critical part of our operations, particularly in light of recent industry trends and initiatives, such as ship-from-store and the emphasis on fast and free delivery when purchasing online. We depend on our vendors' ability to deliver products to us at the right location, right time and in the right quantities. We also depend on third parties for the operation of certain aspects of our supply chain network. In managingThe factors that can adversely affect these aspects of our supply chain we are exposed to the following risks, for example, which may not be fully controllable by us:operations include:

interruptions to our delivery capabilities;

9


failure of third party companiesparties to meet our standards or commitments;
disruptions to our systems and implementation of new systems;
limitations in capacity;
consolidation or other changesbusiness failures in the transportation and distribution market;sectors;
labor strikes or slow-downs impacting ports or any other aspect of our supply chain;
damages or other loss to products; and
costs that are excessive.

It is important that we be able to maintain optimal levels of inventory in each store and distribution center and respond rapidly to shifting demands. Any disruption to, or inefficiency in, our supply chain network could damage our revenue and profitability. The risks associated with our dependence on third parties are greater for small parcel home deliveries because of the relatively small number of carriers with the scope and capacity required by our business. The aforementioned channel shiftcontinuing growth of e-commerce increases our exposure to these risks. If we fail to manage these risks effectively, we could experience a material adverse impact on our reputation, revenue and profitability.

If we fail to attract, retain and engage appropriately qualified employees, including employees in key positions, our businessoperations and operating resultsprofitability may be harmed. Changes in market compensation rates may adversely affect our profitability.

Our performance is highly dependent on attracting, retaining and engaging appropriately qualified employees includingin our executive teamstores, service centers, distribution centers, field and other employees in key positions.corporate offices. Our strategy of offering high quality services and assistance for our customers requires a highly trained and engaged workforce. The turnover rate in the retail industrysector is relatively high, and there is an ongoing need to recruit and train new employees. Factors that affect our ability to maintain sufficient numbers of qualified employees include employee morale, our reputation, unemployment rates, competition from other employers, availability of qualified personnel and our ability to offer appropriate compensation packages. We operate in a competitive labor market and there is a risk that market increases in compensation could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. Failure to recruit or retain qualified employees in the future may impair our efficiency and effectiveness and our ability to pursue growth opportunities. In addition, a significant amount of turnover of our executive team or other employees in key positions with specific knowledge relating to us, our operations and our industry, may negatively impact our operations.

Our strategy to expand into new products, services and technologies brings new business, financial and regulatory risks.

As we introduce new products and services, using new technologies and applications, we may have limited experience in these newer market segments, and our customers may not like our new value propositions. These offerings may present new and difficult technology challenges, and we may be subject to claims if customers of these offerings experience service disruptions or failures or other issues. In addition, this expansion increases the complexity of our business and places significant strain on our management, personnel, operations, systems, technical performance, financial resources, and internal financial and regulatory control and reporting functions. In addition, new initiatives we test through trials and pilots may not scale or grow effectively or as we expected, which could limit our growth and negatively affect our operating results. They may also involve significant laws or regulations that are beyond our current expertise.

Demand for the products and services we sell could decline if we fail to maintain positive brand perception and recognition.

We operate a portfolio of brands with a commitment to customer service and innovation. We believe that recognition and the reputation of our brands are key to our success. Operational factors such as, for example, failure to deliver high quality services, uncompetitive pricing, failure to meet delivery promises or business interruptions could damage our reputation.

10




External factors, such as negative public remarks or accusations, could also be damaging. The ubiquity of social media means that customer feedback and other information about our company are shared with a broad audience in a manner that is easily accessible and rapidly disseminated. Damage to the perception or reputation of our brands could result in, among other things, declines in customer loyalty, decreases in gift card and service plan sales, lower employee retention and productivity and vendor relationship issues, and other factors, all of which could materially affect our revenue and profitability.

Our success is dependent on the design and execution of appropriate business strategies.

We operate in a highly-competitive and ever-changing commercial environment. Our success is dependent on our ability to identify, develop and execute appropriate strategies within this environment. Strategies that have proved successful in the past may not be successful in the future. Our current strategy includes transformational change to certain areas of our business and the pursuit of new growth opportunities. It is possible that our strategies may prove to be ineffective and that we may need to make substantial changes to them in the future. It is also possible that we will be unsuccessful in executing our strategies or that they expose us to additional risks. Our results could be materially adversely affected if we fail to develop and execute appropriate strategies. The market value of our common stock and debt instruments could be materially adversely affected if investors are uncertain about the appropriateness of our strategies or our ability to execute them.

Refer to Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information regarding our strategies.

Failure to effectively manage our real estate portfolio may negatively impact our operating results.

Effective management of our real estate portfolio is critical to our omni-channelmulti-channel strategy. We primarily secureFailure to identify and lease suitable locations for our stores and other facilities could impair our ability to compete successfully and our profitability. Most of our properties through operating leases with third-party landlords. In light of theare subject to long-term nature of most of these commitments,leases. As such, it is essential that we effectively evaluate a range of factors that may influence the success of our long-term real estate strategy. Such factors include, for example:

changing patterns of customer consumption and behavior, particularly in light of an evolving omni-channelmulti-channel environment;

10


the appropriate number of stores in our portfolio;
the formats and sizes of our stores;
the locations of our stores;
the interior layouts of our stores;
the products and services we offer at each store;
the trade area demographics and economic data offactors for each of our stores;
the local competitive positioning in and around our stores;
the primary term lease commitment for each store;
the long-term lease option coverage for each store;
the occupancy cost of our stores relative to market rents;
our supply chain network strategy; and
our ongoing network of service locations.

If we fail to effectively evaluate these factors fail toor negotiate appropriate terms which keep us market competitive, or if unforeseen changes arise, the consequences could include, for example:

having to closeclosing stores and abandonabandoning the related assets, while retaining the financial commitments of the lease;leases;
incurring significant costs to remodel or transform our stores;
havingoperating stores, supply chain or service locations that no longer meet the needs of our business; and
bearing excessive lease expenses.

These consequences could have a materiallymaterial adverse impact on our profitability, cash flows and liquidity.

For leased property, the financial impact of exiting a location can vary greatly depending on, among other factors, the terms of the lease, the condition of the local real estate market, demand for the specific property, our relationship with the landlord and the availability of potential sub-lease tenants. It is difficult for us to influence some of these factors and the costs of exiting a property can be significant. WeIn addition to rent, we are still responsible for the maintenance, taxes, insurance and common area maintenance charges for vacant properties until the lease commitment expires or is terminated. Similarly, when we enter into a contract with a tenant to sub-lease property, we usually retain our obligations as the master lessor.lessee. This leaves us at risk for any remaining liability in the event of default by the sub-lease tenant.

Failure to effectively manage our costs could have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

Some of our operating costs are fixed and/or are subject to multi-year contracts. Some elements of our costs may be higher than our competitors,competitors' because of, for example, of our differential service offerings or levels of customer service. As discussed above, our revenues are susceptible to volatility from various sources, which can lead to periods of flat or declining revenues. Accordingly, our ongoing drive to reduce costcosts and increase efficiency represents a strategic imperative. Failure to successfully manage our costs could have a material adverse impact on our profitability and curtail our ability to fund our growth or other critical initiatives.

Our liquidity may be materially adversely affected by constraintsConstraints in the capital markets or our vendor credit terms.terms may have a material adverse impact on our liquidity.

We need sufficient sources of liquidity to fund our working capital requirements, service our outstanding indebtedness and finance business opportunities. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be forced to curtail our operations or we may not be able

11




to pursue business opportunities. The principal sources of our liquidity are funds generated from operating activities, available cash and liquid investments, credit facilities, other debt arrangements and trade payables. Our liquidity could be materially adversely impacted if our vendors reduce payment terms and/or impose tighter credit limits. If our sources of liquidity do not satisfy our requirements, we may need to seek additional financing. The future availability of financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as economic and market conditions, the regulatory environment for banks and other financial institutions, the availability of credit, and our credit ratings and our reputation with potential lenders. These factors could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our costs of borrowing and our ability to pursue business opportunities, and threaten our ability to meet our obligations as they become due.

Changes in our credit ratings may limit our access to capital and materially increase our borrowing costs.

Our credit ratings and outlooks at January 30, 2016March 29, 2018, are summarized below. In fiscal 2016,2018, Fitch Ratings Limited affirmed its long-term credit rating of BBB- and changed its outlook from Stable to Positive. In fiscal 2019, Standard & Poor's Rating Services upgraded its long-term credit rating of BBB- to BBB and changed its outlook from BBPositive to BB+ with a Stable, outlook.and Moody's Investors Service, Inc. upgradedaffirmed its long-term credit rating from Baa2 toof Baa1 with a Stable outlook. Fitch Ratings Limited upgraded its long-term credit rating from BB to BBB- with a Stable outlook.

11


Rating AgencyRating Outlook
Standard and& Poor'sBB+BBB Stable
Moody'sBaa1 Stable
FitchBBB- StablePositive

Any future downgrades to our credit ratings and outlook could negatively impact the perception of our credit risk and thus our access to capital markets, borrowing costs, vendor terms and lease terms. Our credit ratings are based upon information furnished by us or obtained by a rating agency from its own sources and are subject to revision, suspension or withdrawal by one or more rating agencies at any time. Rating agencies may change the ratings assigned to us due to developments that are beyond our control, including the introduction of new rating practices and methodologies.

We are highly dependent on the cash flows and net earnings we generate during our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season.
 
Approximately one-third of our revenue and more than one-half of our net earnings have historically been generated in our fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. In addition, the holiday shopping season also incorporates many other unpredictable factors, such as the level of competitive promotional activity and customer buying patterns, which makes it difficult to forecast and forecasting and reactingreact to these factors quickly is difficult.quickly. Unexpected events or developments such as natural or man-made disasters, changes in consumer demand, economic factors, product sourcing issues, failure or interruption of management information systems or disruptions in services or systems provided or managed by third-party vendors could significantly disrupt our operations. As a result of these factors, there is a risk that our fourth quarter and annual results arecould be adversely affected.

Failure to effectively manage strategic ventures, alliances or acquisitions could have a negative impact on our business.

In the future, weWe may decide to enter into new joint ventures, alliances or acquisitions. Assessing a potential opportunity can be based on assumptions that might not ultimately prove to be correct. In addition, the amount of information we can obtain about a potential opportunity may be limited.

The success of ventures,partnerships, alliances or acquisitions with third parties (collectively, "new ventures"). Assessing the viability of new ventures is also largely dependent ontypically subject to significant uncertainty and the currentsuccess of such new ventures can be adversely affected by many factors, including, for example:

different and future participation, working relationship and strategic visionincremental business risks of the new venture;
failure to motivate and retain key employees of the new venture;
uncertainty of forecasting financial performance;
failure to integrate aspects of the new venture into our existing business, such as new product or alliance partners, which can change following a transaction. Integrating new businesses, storesservice offerings or concepts can be difficult and risky. These types of transactions may divert our capital and our management's attention from other business issues and opportunities and may also negatively impact our return on invested capital. Entering into new ventures, alliances or acquisitions may also impair our relationships with our vendors or other strategic partners. We may not be ableinformation technology systems;
failure to successfully assimilate or integrate businesses that we acquire, including their personnel, financial systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures, or we may encounter challenges in achievingmaintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting. Failurereporting;
failure to effectively integrategenerate expected synergies such as cost reductions;
unforeseen changes in the business environment of the new venture;
disputes or strategic differences with other third-party participants in the new venture; and manage strategic
adverse impacts on relationships with vendors and other key partners of our existing business or the new venture.


12




If new ventures alliances and acquisitions could adversely affectare unsuccessful, our profitability and liquidity and profitability could be materially adversely affected, and we may require impairmentbe required to recognize material impairments to goodwill and other assets acquired. New ventures may also divert our financial resources and management's attention from other important areas of associated goodwill, tradenames or other assets.our business.

Failure to protectprevent or effectively respond to a breach of the integrity,privacy or security and confidentiality of our customer, employee, and customer datavendor or company information could expose us to litigationsubstantial costs and materiallyreputational damage, as well as litigation and enforcement actions.

Our business involves the collection, use and storage of customer information, including payment card information, as well as confidential information regarding our standingemployees, vendors and other company information. We also share confidential information with suppliers and other third parties, as well as use third-party technology and systems which transmit customer information for a variety of activities. While we take significant steps to protect this information, third party criminal activity such as cyber-attacks, lapses in our controls or the intentional or negligent actions of employees, business associates or third parties, may undermine our privacy and security measures and unauthorized parties may obtain access to our data systems and misappropriate employee, customer and other confidential data. Furthermore, because the methods used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and may not be immediately detected, we may be unable to anticipate such attacks or promptly and effectively respond to them. Any compromise of our customer information or other confidential information could have a material adverse effect on our reputation or our relationships with our employees or customers.customers and partners, which may in turn have a negative impact on our revenue and may expose us to material costs, penalties and claims.

The useSensitive customer data may also be present on customer-owned devices entrusted to us for service and repair. Vulnerable code on products sold or serviced, including our exclusive brands, may also result in a compromise of customer privacy or security. Our efforts to protect against such compromises and ensure appropriate handling of personally identifiablecustomer data byon devices we manufacture, sell and service may not be effective, resulting in potential liability and damage to our business, our business associates and third parties is regulated at the state, federal and international levels. We are also contractually obligated to comply with certain industry standards regarding payment card information. customer relationships.

Increasing costs associated with information security, such as increased investment in technology and qualified staff, the costs of compliance and costs resulting from fraud, could cause our business and results of operations to suffer materially. Additionally, the success of our online operations depends upon the secure transmission of customer and other confidential information over public networks, including the use of cashless payments. While we take significant steps to protect this information, lapses in our controls or the intentional or negligent actions of employees, business associates or third parties may undermine our security measures. As a result, unauthorized parties may obtain access to our data systems and misappropriate employee, customer and other confidential data. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may not prevent the compromise of our customer transaction processing capabilities and customer personal data. Furthermore, because the methods used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and may not be immediately detected, we may be unable to anticipate these methods or promptly implement preventative measures. Any such compromise of our security or the security of information residing with our business associates or third parties could have a material adverse effect on our reputation or our relationship with our employees, which may in turn have a negative impact on our revenue, and may expose us to material costs, penalties and compensation claims. In addition, any compromise of our data

12


security may materially increase the costs we incur to protect against such breaches and could subject us to additional legal risk.

NaturalWe rely heavily on our information technology systems for our key business processes. Any failure or interruption in these systems could have a material adverse impact on our business.

The effective and efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information technology systems and those of our information technology vendors. We rely heavily on these information technology systems to manage all key aspects of our business, including demand forecasting, purchasing, supply chain management, point-of-sale processing, services fulfillment, staff planning and deployment, financial management, reporting and forecasting and safeguarding critical and sensitive information.

Our information technology systems and those of our partners are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, worms, other malicious computer programs, denial-of-service attacks, security breaches (through cyber-attacks and other malicious actions), catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes, earthquakes and hurricanes, and usage errors by our employees. The failure or interruption of these information systems, data centers or their backup systems could significantly disrupt our business and cause higher costs and lost revenues and could threaten our ability to remain in operation.

We also utilize complex information technology platforms to operate our websites and mobile applications. If we do not continually invest in securing these systems against attacks or fail to effectively upgrade and maintain our hardware, software, network and system infrastructure and improve the efficiency and resiliency of our systems, it could cause system interruptions and delays. Disruptions to these services, such as those caused by unforeseen traffic levels, malicious attacks, other technical difficulties or events outside of our control, such as natural disasters, changes in climate, geo-politicalpower or telecommunications failures or loss of critical data, could prevent us from accepting and fulfilling customer orders for products or services, which could cause us to forgo material revenues, incur material costs and adversely affect our reputation.

Catastrophic events or other catastrophes could adversely affect our operating results.

The risk or actual occurrence of various catastrophic events could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our financial performance. Such events may be caused by, for example:

13




natural disasters or extreme weather events;
diseases or epidemics that may affect our employees, customers or partners;
floods, fire or other catastrophes affecting our properties;
cybersecurity breaches; or
terrorism, civil unrest or other conflicts.

Such events can adversely affect our work force and prevent employees and customers from reaching our stores and properties and can disrupt or disable portions of our supply chain and distribution network. They can also affect our information systems, resulting in disruption to various aspects of our operations, including our ability to transact with customers and fulfill orders. As a consequence of these or other catastrophic events, we may endure interruption to our operations or losses of property, equipment or inventory, which would adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

Our exclusive brands products are subject to several additional product, supply chain and legal risks that could affect our operating results.

Sales of our exclusive brands products, which include Insignia, Modal, Dynex, Init, Platinum and Rocketfish branded products, represent an important component of our revenue.product offerings and our revenue and profitability. Most of these products are manufactured by contract manufacturers based in southeasternsoutheast Asia. This arrangement exposes us to the following additional potential risks, which could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our operating results:

we have greater exposure and responsibility to consumers for warranty replacements and repairs as a result of exclusive brand product defects, and our recourse to contract manufacturers for such warranty liabilities may be limited in foreign jurisdictions;
we may be subject to regulatory compliance and/or product liability claims relating to personal injury, death or property damage caused by exclusive brand products, some of which may require us to take significant actions such as product recalls;
we may experience disruptions in manufacturing or logistics due to inconsistent and unanticipated order patterns, our inability to develop long-term relationships with key manufacturers or unforeseen natural disasters;
we may not be able to locate manufacturers that meet our internal standards, whether for new exclusive brand products or for migration of the manufacturing of products from an existing manufacturer;
we are subject to developing and often-changing labor and environmental laws for the manufacture of products in foreign countries, and we may be unable to conform to new rules or interpretations in a timely manner;
we may be subject to claims by technology or other intellectual property owners if we inadvertently infringe upon their patents or other intellectual property rights, or if we fail to pay royalties owed on our exclusive brand products;
we may be unable to obtain or adequately protect patents and other intellectual property rights on our exclusive brand products or manufacturing processes; and
regulations regarding disclosure of efforts to identify the country of origin of “conflict minerals” in certain portions of our supply chain could increase the cost of doing business and, depending on the findings of our country of origin inquiry, could have an adverse effect on our reputation.

Maintaining consistent quality, availability and competitive pricing of our exclusive brandsbrand products helps us build and maintain customer loyalty, generate revenue and achieve acceptable margins. Failure to maintain these factors could have a significant adverse impact on the demand for exclusive brand products and the profits we are able to generate from them.

We are subject to certain statutory, regulatory and legal developments which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Our statutory, regulatory and legal environments expose us to complex compliance and litigation risks that could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our operations. TheSome of the most significant compliance and litigation risks we face are:

the difficulty of complying with sometimes conflicting statutes and regulations in local, national or international jurisdictions;

13


the potential for unexpected costs related to compliance with new or existing environmental legislation or international agreements affecting energy, carbon emissions, electronics recycling and water or product materials;
ensuring compliance with applicable product compliance laws and regulations with respect to both the products we sell and contract to manufacture, including laws and regulationregulations related to product safety and product transport;
the impact of new regulations governing data privacy and security, whether imposed as a result of increased cyber-security risks or otherwise;

14




the impact of other new or changing statutes and regulations, including, but not limited to, financial reform, National Labor Relations Board rule changes, health care reform, corporate governance matters, escheatment rules, rules governing pricing, content, distribution, copyright, mobile communications, electronic device certification or payment services, and/or other as yet unknown legislation, that could affect how we operate and execute our strategies as well as alter our expense structure;
the impact of the potential implementation of more restrictive trade policies, higher tariffs or the renegotiation of existing trade agreements in the U.S. or countries where we sell our products and services or procure products;
the impact of potential changes in globalU.S. or other countries' tax laws (orand regulations or evolving interpretations thereof by courtsof existing laws, including additional guidance and taxing authorities)legislation related to the Tax Cuts and accounting standards;Jobs Act; and
the impact of litigation trends, including class action lawsuits involving consumers and shareholders, and labor and employment matters.

Regulatory activity focused on the retail industrysector has grown in recent years, increasing the risk of fines and additional operating costs associated with compliance. Additionally, defending against lawsuits and other proceedings may involve significant expense and divert management's attention and resources from other matters.

Changes to the National Labor Relations Actlabor or other labor-related statutesemployment laws or regulations could have an adverse impact on our costs and impair the viability of our operating model.

As an employer of approximately 125,000 people in a large number of different jurisdictions, we are subject to risks related to employment laws and regulations including, for example:

unionization and related regulations that affect the nature of labor relations, the organization of unions and union elections; in the U.S., the National Labor Relations Board continually considers changes to such regulations; as of January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, none of our U.S. operations had employees represented by labor unions or working under collective bargaining agreements;
laws that impact the relationship between the company and independent contractors; and
laws that impact minimum wage, sick time, paid leave and scheduling requirements that could directly or indirectly increase our payroll costs and/or impact the level of service we are able to provide.

Changes to laws and regulations such as these could adversely impact our reputation, our ability to continue operations and thus our revenue and profitability.

Economic, regulatory and other developments could adversely affect our ability to offer attractive promotional financing to our customers and adversely affect the profits we generate from these programs.
 
We offer promotional financing and credit cards issued by third-party banks that manage and directly extend credit to our customers. Customers choosing promotional financing can receive extended payment terms and low- or no-interest financing on qualifying purchases. We viewbelieve our financing programs as a way to generate incremental revenue of products and services from customers who prefer the financing terms to other available forms of payment.payment or otherwise need access to financing in order to make purchases. Approximately 21%24% of our fiscal 20162018 revenue was transacted using one of the company's branded cards. In addition, we earn profit-share income from our banking partners based on the performance of the programs. The income we earn in this regard is subject to numerous factors, including the volume and value of transactions, the terms of promotional financing offers, bad debt rates, interest rates, the regulatory and competitive environment and expenses of operating the program. Adverse changes to any of these factors could impair our ability to offer these programs to customers and reduce customer purchases and our ability to earn income from sharing in the profits of the programs.
We rely heavily on our information technology systems for our key business processes. Any failure or interruption in these systems could have a material adverse impact on our business.
The effective and efficient operation of our business is dependent on our management information systems. We rely heavily on our management information systems to manage all key aspects of our business, including demand forecasting, purchasing, supply chain management, point-of-sale processing, services fulfillment, staff planning and deployment, website offerings, financial management, reporting and forecasting and safeguarding critical and sensitive information. The failure of our management information systems to perform as we anticipate (whether from internal or external factors), or to meet the continuously evolving needs of our business, could significantly disrupt our business and cause, for example, higher costs and lost revenues and could threaten our ability to remain in operation.

14



We utilize complex information technology platforms to operate our websites and mobile applications. Disruptions to these services, such as those caused by unforeseen traffic levels or other technical difficulties, could cause us to forego material revenues and adversely affect our reputation with consumers.
 
We utilize third-party vendors for certain aspects of our business operations.
 
We engage key third-party business partners to support various functions of our business, including but not limited to, information technology, web hosting and cloud-based services, human resource operations, customer loyalty programs, promotional financing and customer loyalty credit cards, gift cards, customer warranty, delivery and installation, technical support, transportation and insurance programs. Any material disruption in our relationship with key third-party business partners or any disruption in the services or systems provided or managed by third parties could impact our revenues and cost structure and hinder our operations, particularly if a disruption occurs during peak revenue periods.


15




Our international activities are subject to many of the same risks as described above, as well as to risks associated with the legislative, judicial, regulatory, political, economic and economiccultural factors specific to the countries or regions in which we operate.
 
We operate retail locations in Canada and Mexico. In addition, we have wholly owned legal entities registered in various other foreign countries, including Bermuda, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, the Republic of Mauritius, the Netherlands, Taiwan, Turks and Caicos and the U.K. During fiscal 2016,2018, our International segment's operations generated 8% of our revenue. In general, the risk factors identified above also have relevance to our International operations. In addition, our International operations also expose us to other risks, including those related to, for example:

political conditions;conditions and geopolitical events, including war and terrorism;
economic conditions, including monetary and fiscal policies and tax rules;
legal and regulatory environments;
rules governing international trade and potential changes to trade policies or trade agreements and ownership of foreign entities;
risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates;
cultural differences that we may be unable to anticipate or respond to appropriately;
different rules or practices regarding employee relations, including the existence of works councils or unions;
difficulties in enforcing intellectual property rights; and
difficulties encountered in exerting appropriate management oversight to operations in remote locations.
 
These factors could significantly disrupt our International operations and have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability and could lead us to us incurringincur material impairments and other exit costs.

Failure to meet the financial performance guidance or other forward-looking statements we have provided to the public could result in a decline in our stock price.
 
We may provide public guidance on our expected financial results or other forward-looking information for future periods. Although we believe that this guidance provides investors and analysts with a better understanding of management's expectations for the future and is useful to our existing and potential stockholders,shareholders, such guidance is comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not be in line with guidance we have provided. We may not be able to accurately forecast our growth rate. We base our expense levels and investment plans on sales estimates. A significant portion of our expenses and investments are fixed, and we may not be able to adjust our spending quickly enough if our sales are less than expected. Our revenue growth may not be sustainable and our percentage growth rates may decrease. Our revenue and operating profit growth depends on the continued growth of demand for the products and services offered by us, and our business is affected by general economic and business conditions worldwide. If our financial results for a particular period do not meet our guidance or the expectations of market participants, or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.


1516




Item 2. Properties.
Stores, Distribution Centers, Service Centers and Corporate Facilities
Domestic Segment
The following table summarizes the location and total square footage of our Domestic segment stores at the end of fiscal 20162018:
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand-Alone Stores
 Pacific Sales
Stores
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand-Alone Stores
 Pacific Sales
Stores
Alabama 15
 5
 
 12
 2
 
Alaska 2
 
 
 2
 
 
Arizona 24
 2
 
 22
 1
 
Arkansas 9
 5
 
 9
 2
 
California 118
 26
 28
 117
 16
 28
Colorado 21
 5
 
 21
 4
 
Connecticut 12
 5
 
 12
 2
 
Delaware 4
 1
 
 3
 1
 
District of Columbia 2
 
 
 2
 
 
Florida 64
 32
 
 64
 28
 
Georgia 28
 10
 
 28
 8
 
Hawaii 2
 
 
 2
 
 
Idaho 5
 2
 
 5
 1
 
Illinois 50
 14
 
 46
 11
 
Indiana 23
 11
 
 23
 10
 
Iowa 13
 1
 
 11
 1
 
Kansas 9
 3
 
 8
 2
 
Kentucky 9
 7
 
 9
 7
 
Louisiana 16
 4
 
 16
 4
 
Maine 5
 
 
 3
 
 
Maryland 23
 12
 
 21
 7
 
Massachusetts 24
 10
 
 23
 7
 
Michigan 32
 11
 
 32
 9
 
Minnesota 23
 11
 
 20
 11
 
Mississippi 8
 2
 
 8
 1
 
Missouri 19
 10
 
 18
 7
 
Montana 3
 
 
 3
 
 
Nebraska 5
 3
 
 5
 3
 
Nevada 10
 4
 
 10
 3
 
New Hampshire 6
 3
 
 6
 3
 
New Jersey 27
 11
 
 26
 7
 
New Mexico 5
 3
 
 5
 2
 
New York 54
 15
 
 53
 8
 
North Carolina 32
 12
 
 32
 7
 
North Dakota 4
 1
 
 4
 1
 
Ohio 37
 11
 
 35
 9
 
Oklahoma 13
 4
 
 13
 3
 
Oregon 12
 3
 
 12
 2
 
Pennsylvania 37
 14
 
 37
 12
 
Puerto Rico 3
 
 
 3
 
 
Rhode Island 1
 
 
 1
 
 
South Carolina 15
 4
 
 13
 3
 
South Dakota 2
 1
 
 2
 1
 
Tennessee 16
 9
 
 16
 7
 
Texas 103
 33
 
 103
 22
 
Utah 10
 
 
 10
 
 
Vermont 1
 
 
 1
 
 
Virginia 34
 10
 
 34
 7
 
Washington 19
 8
 
 19
 3
 
West Virginia 5
 
 
 5
 
 
Wisconsin 22
 11
 
 22
 11
 
Wyoming 1
 1
 
 1
 1
 
Total 1,037
 350
 28
Total store count 1,008
 257
 28
            
Square footage (in thousands) 39,999
 480
 737
 39,082
 362
 735
Average square feet per store (in thousands) 39
 1
 26
 39
 1
 26



1617




The following table summarizes the ownership status of our Domestic segment store locations at the end of fiscal 20162018:
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand Alone Stores
 Pacific Sales
Stores
 U.S.
Best Buy
Stores
 
U.S. Best Buy
Mobile Stand- Alone Stores
(1)
 Pacific Sales
Stores
Owned store locations 25
 
 
 25
 
 
Owned buildings and leased land 36
 
 
 36
 
 
Leased store locations 976
 350
 28
 947
 257
 28
(1)
On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to close all of our 257 remaining Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in the U.S. We expect the majority of these stores to close during the first half of fiscal 2019. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

The following table summarizes the location, ownership status and total square footage of space utilized for distribution centers, service centers, corporate and corporatefield offices of our Domestic segment at the end of fiscal 20162018:
   Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)
 Location Leased Owned Location Leased Owned
Distribution centers 23 locations in 17 U.S. states 7,489
 3,168
 23 locations in 17 U.S. states 8,750
 3,168
Geek Squad service centers(1)
 Louisville, Kentucky 237
 
 Louisville, Kentucky 237
 
Principal corporate headquarters(2)
 Richfield, Minnesota 
 1,452
 Richfield, Minnesota 
 1,452
Territory field offices 12 locations throughout the U.S. 104
 
 11 locations throughout the U.S. 96
 
Pacific Sales corporate office space Torrance, California 12
 
 Torrance, California 12
 
(1)The leased space utilized by our Geek Squad operations is used primarily to service notebook and desktop computers.
(2)Our principal corporate headquarters consists of four interconnected buildings. Certain vendors who provide us with a variety of corporate services occupy a portion of our principal corporate headquarters. We also sublease a portion of our principal corporate headquarters to unaffiliated third parties.

18

Table of Contents



International Segment

The following table summarizes the location and total square footage of our International segment continuing operations stores at the end of fiscal 2018:2016:
Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Express
Stores
Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Express
Stores
Canada          
Alberta19
 9
 
19
 9
 
British Columbia22
 10
 
22
 10
 
Manitoba4
 
 
4
 
 
New Brunswick3
 
 
3
 
 
Newfoundland1
 
 
1
 
 
Nova Scotia3
 1
 
3
 1
 
Ontario55
 30
 
54
 26
 
Prince Edward Island1
 
 
1
 
 
Quebec24
 6
 
23
 5
 
Saskatchewan4
 
 
4
 
 
          
Square footage (in thousands)3,848
 52
 
3,783
 48
 
Average square feet per store (in thousands)28
 1
 
28
 1
 
          
Mexico          
Ciudad de Mexico8
 
 4
Coahuila
 
 1

 
 1
Estado de Mexico3
 
 1
4
 
 
Distrito Federal7
 
 3
Guanajuato1
 
 
Jalisco4
 
 
4
 
 
Michoacan1
 
 
Morelos1
 
 
Nuevo Leon2
 
 1
2
 
 1
Michoacan1
 
 
Quintana Roo1
 
 
San Luis Potosi1
 
 
1
 
 
Veracruz1
 
 
Yucatan1
 
 
          
Square footage (in thousands)634
 
 9
759
 
 12
Average square feet per store (in thousands)35
 
 2
30
 
 2
          
Total store count154
 56
 6
159
 51
 6


17


The following table summarizes the ownership status of our International segment continuing operations store locations at the end of fiscal 20162018:
Canada MexicoCanada Mexico
Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy Express StoresBest Buy
Stores
 Best Buy
Mobile
Stores
 Best Buy
Stores
 Best Buy Express Stores
Owned store locations3
 
 
 
3
 
 
 
Leased store locations133
 56
 18
 6
131
 51
 25
 6

The following table summarizes the location, ownership status and total square footage of space for distribution centers and corporate offices of our International segment continuing operations at the end of fiscal 20162018:
  Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)  Square Footage (in thousands)   Square Footage (in thousands)
Distribution Centers Leased Owned Principal Corporate Offices Leased OwnedDistribution Centers Leased Owned Principal Corporate Offices Leased Owned
CanadaBrampton and Bolton, Ontario 1,685
 
 Burnaby, British Columbia 141
 
Brampton, Ontario 1,057
 
 Burnaby, British Columbia 141
 
Vancouver, British Columbia 439
 
    Vancouver, British Columbia 439
 
    
MexicoEstado de Mexico, Mexico 89
 
 Distrito Federal, Mexico 32
 
Estado de Mexico, Mexico 89
 
 Distrito Federal, Mexico 32
 


19




Exclusive Brands

We lease approximately 61,00056,000 square feet of office space in China to support our exclusive brands operations.

Operating Leases

Almost all of our stores and a majority of our distribution facilities are leased. Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 12, Contingencies and Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


1820




Executive Officers of the Registrant
(As of March 21, 201629, 2018)

Name Age Position With the Company 
Years
With the
Company
 Age Position with the Company 
Years
with the
Company
Hubert Joly 56 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 3 58 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 5
Sharon L. McCollam 53 Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer 3
Paula F. Baker 48 Chief Human Resources Officer 12
Corie Barry 43 Chief Financial Officer 18
Kamy Scarlett 54 Chief Human Resources Officer 4
Shari L. Ballard 49 President, U.S. Retail 23 51 
Senior Executive Vice President & President, Multi-channel Retail

 25
Mary Lou Kelley 55 President, E-commerce 2
R. Michael (Mike) Mohan 48 Chief Merchandising Officer 12 50 
Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Merchandising and Marketing Officer

 14
Keith J. Nelsen 52 General Counsel and Secretary 10 54 General Counsel and Secretary 12
Greg Revelle 38 Chief Marketing Officer 1
Asheesh Saksena 53 Chief Strategic Growth Officer 2
Trish Walker 51 President, Services 2
Mathew R. Watson 45 Chief Accounting Officer 10 47 Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer 12

Hubert Joly is chairmanour Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Since joining Best BuyHe was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director in September 2012 and as Chairman in June 2015. Mr. Joly has ledwas previously the company’s Renew Blue transformation. Aspresident and chief executive officer of Carlson, Inc., a result,worldwide hospitality and travel company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, from 2008 until he joined Best Buy has delivered improved domestic comparative sales and profit; an increase in customer satisfaction and employee morale; an enhanced in-store experience with the additionBuy. Prior to becoming chief executive officer of thousands of shops-in-shop developed in partnership with many of the world’s leading technology companies; and, a richer online shopping experience on BestBuy.com. Before joining Best Buy,Carlson, Mr. Joly was president and CEOchief executive officer of Carlson, Inc., a global hospitality and travel company, from 2008 until he joined us. He previously led Carlson Wagonlit Travel, as its CEO,a business travel management company, from 2004 until 2008. He held several senior executive positions with Vivendi S.A., a French multinational media and held senior leadership positionstelecommunications company, from 1999 to 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Joly worked in the technology sector at Vivendi Universal Games and Electronic Data Systems’ French business. He serves onSystems (now part of Hewlett-Packard Co.) from 1996 to 1999 and at McKinsey & Company, Inc. from 1983 to 1996. Mr. Joly is currently a member of the boardsboard of directors of Ralph Lauren Corp., a leader in the design, marketing and retailing of premier lifestyle products. He also serves on the executive committees for the Retail Industry Leaders Association and the Minnesota Business Partnership. He previously servedPartnership, and on the boards of Carlson, Inc., the Rezidor Hotel Group and Carlson Wagonlit Travel.

Sharon L. McCollam was appointed Chief Administrative and Chief Financial Officer in December 2012. In this role, she leads our global finance, information technology, information security, supply chain, logistics, real estate, procurement, enterprise customer care, pricing, and internal audit functions, as well as our Mexico operations. Ms. McCollam was previously Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Williams-Sonoma Inc., a premier specialty retailer of home furnishings, from July 2006 until her retirement in March 2012. At Williams-Sonoma, she was responsible for the long-term strategic planning activities of the company and oversaw multiple key functions, including global finance, treasury, investor relations, information technology, real estate, store development, corporate operations and human resources. Ms. McCollam also held various executive leadership roles, including principal accounting officer, at Williams-Sonoma from March 2000 to July 2006. Prior to her time at Williams-Sonoma, Ms. McCollam served as Chief Financial Officer of Dole Fresh Vegetables Inc. from 1996 to 2000 and in various other finance-related leadership positions at Dole Food Company Inc., a producer and marketer of fresh fruit and vegetables, from 1993 to 1996. Ms. McCollam serves as a member of the board of directors for Sutter Health, a nonprofit networktrustees of hospitalsthe Minneapolis Institute of Arts and doctors in Northern California; Art.com, an online specialty art retailer; and Privalia Venta Directa, s.a., a European e-commerce apparel retailer. Ms. McCollamthe Minnesota Orchestra. Mr. Joly previously served as a memberdirector of Carlson, Inc.; chair of the board of directors of OfficeMax Incorporated, Williams-Sonoma,the Rezidor Hotel Group; chair of the board of directors of Carlson Wagonlit Travel; chair of the Travel Facilitation Sub-Committee of the U.S. Department of Commerce Travel and Del Monte Foods Company.Tourism Advisory Board; on the executive committee of the World Travel and Tourism Council; and on the board of overseers of the Carlson School of Management.

Paula F. Baker Corie Barry was appointed our Chief Financial Officer in June 2016. In this role, she is responsible for overseeing all aspects of global finance, as well as information technology, digital technology, enterprise risk and compliance, audit, procurement and pricing functions. Ms. Barry joined Best Buy in 1999 and has held a variety of financial and operational roles within the organization, both in the field and at corporate. She most recently was the company’s chief strategic growth officer and the interim leader of Best Buy’s services organization from 2015 until 2016. Prior to that dual-role, she served as senior vice president of domestic finance from 2013 to 2015; vice president, chief financial officer and business development of our home business group from 2012 to 2013; and vice president, finance of the home customer solutions group from 2010 to 2012. Prior to Best Buy, Ms. Barry worked at Deloitte & Touche, LLP.

Kamy Scarlett was appointed our Chief Human Resources Officer effective March 2016.in June 2017. In herthis role, Ms. Bakershe oversees talent development and the health and well-being of the more than 125,000 Best Buy employees worldwide. Ms. Baker has a proven track record of leading teams that drove stellar financial and customer performance results.Scarlett joined Best Buy in 2014. She has served in a variety of retail operations, marketing and human resources leadership roles since joining the companybeginning her career in 2004.retail more than 30 years ago. Most recently, she was territorysenior vice president of retail and chief human resources officer for Best Buy Canada from 2014 to May 2017. She was responsible for sales and profits in more than 180 stores in addition to enacting the human resources and talent management strategies for the Southeast region of the United States since 2012, responsible for 172 stores and more than 10,000 employees.company. Prior to that, Ms. Baker was a territory human resources director from 2010 to 2012. In that role, she built strong business partnerships that helped create a culture of engagement, reduced turnover, succession planning and talent development that led to company-leading business performance. She has also previously held district manager and general manager roles. Before joining Best Buy, Ms. Baker workedScarlett was the chief operating officer from 2012 to 2014 at Books-A-Million, Golfsmith InternationalGrafton-Fraser Inc., a leading Canadian retailer of men’s apparel. She also previously held leadership roles at Loblaw Cos., Hudson’s Bay Co. and St. Andrews Golf Company in retail leadership roles. She received her bachelor’s degree in accounting/finance from the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. She serves as a board member for the Best Buy PAC and for Girls Incorporated of Greater Atlanta.Dylex Inc.




19


Shari L. Ballard is theour Senior Executive Vice President of U.S.and President, Multi-channel Retail. In her role, she is responsible for all domesticU.S. Best Buy stores. Ms. Ballard is a seasoned executive with deep retail experience. After graduating with a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan - Flint, she was hired in 1993 to work in a localstores, e-commerce, Best Buy store, beginningMexico and the company’s real estate strategy. Prior to her current role, she served as an assistant store managerpresident, U.S. retail from 2014 to 2017; chief human resources officer from 2014 to 2016; president, international and risingchief human resources officer from 2013 to general manager. After a variety of retail leadership roles, she was promoted to2014; executive vice president ofand president, international from 2012 to 2013; executive vice president, president - Americas from March 2010 until 2012; executive vice president - retail channel management from 2007 to 2010; and executive vice president - human resources and legal in 2004. In 2007,from 2004 to 2007. Ms. Ballard assumed responsibility for Best Buy storesjoined us in the United States, focusing her energies on deepening customer relationships1993 and better utilizing the full rangehas served as senior vice president, vice president, and general and assistant store manager. Ms. Ballard

21




serves on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of the University of Minnesota Foundation. She previously served on the board of directors of the Delhaize Group, and the University of Minnesota Foundation.

Mary Lou Kelley is the President of E-commerce, having joined us in 2014. In this role, Ms. Kelley leads the company’s overall digital strategy and is charged with advancing Best Buy’s global e-commerce vision and retail omni-channel capabilities.  She is responsible for all of Best Buy’s global e-commerce channels, including bestbuy.com and the company’s highly-rated mobile applications. Ms. Kelley has extensive experience in retail e-commerce. Prior to joining Best Buy, she was the Senior Vice President E-commerce from 2010 to 2014 for Chico’s FAS where she was responsible for the direct-to-consumer business for its three brands, Chico’s, White House Black Market and Soma Intimates. Ms. Kelley has over 25 years experience in retail, e-commerce, marketing, and strategic planning, including nine years with L.L.Bean, Inc., primarily as its Vice President of E-commerce. Prior to L.L.Bean, Ms. Kelley held positions of increasing leadership with McKinsey and Company and Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc. Her earlier career experience included stints with Sears and other small multi-channel retailers. Ms. Kelley holds a B.A. in economics from Boston College and an MBA from the Darden Graduate School of Business at the University of Virginia. She serves on the boards of Vera Bradley, the women’s handbags and accessories brand, and the Minnesota Orchestra.Belgian-based international food retailer.

R. Michael (Mike) Mohan is theour Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising and Marketing Officer. He is responsible for the category management, merchandising, marketing, supply chain and merchandisingBest Buy Direct functions for Best Buy’s core U.S. business. Prior to his current role, he served as chief merchandising officer from 2014 to 2017; president, home from 2013 to 2014; senior vice president, general manager - home business their largest market, reporting directly into Hubert Joly, Chairmangroup from 2011 to 2013; senior vice president, home theatre from 2008 to 2011; and CEO. In this capacity, Mr. Mohan uses his 25 years of retail and management experiencevice president, home entertainment from 2006 to build actionable business plans that drive business growth, profitability, market share gains, increased employee and customer satisfaction for Best Buy. Specifically, Mr. Mohan oversees all category strategy, merchandising, purchasing, vendor relations, financial planning and end-of-life product disposition, inclusive of Pacific Kitchen & Bath, Magnolia and2008. Prior to joining Best Buy Mobile operations, both the standalone stores and store-within-a-store formats. He also oversees the global private label product business, and the business sales channel at the company. Mr. Mohan joined Best Buy in February 2004 as vice president, of the digital imaging, business group, assuming additional responsibilities through his career, covering nearly all product/business categories at Best Buy, becoming an enterprise senior vice president in April 2008, and the president of the home business group in January 2013. He was appointed to chief merchandising officer in January 2014. Before joining Best Buy, Mr. Mohan served aswas vice president and general merchandisemerchandising manager for Good Guys, an audio/video specialty retailer with 79 stores in the western United States. HeU.S. Mr. Mohan also previously worked at Future Shop in Canada from 1988 to 1997, prior to our acquisition of the company, where he served in various positions at Future Shop from 1988 through 1997.merchandising roles. Mr. Mohan has served as member ofserves on the board of directors for Bloomin’ Brands, a hospitality industry leaderscompany that owns several American casual dining restaurant chains, and as a national trustee for the Consumer Electronics Association since October 2013.Boys & Girls Clubs of America.

Keith J. Nelsen has served as our General Counsel and Secretary since 2011. In this role, he manages our enterprise legal function and risk management functions, as well as acts as Secretary to our Board of Directors. Previously, in addition to his current role, he also served as Chief Risk Officerchief risk officer from 2012 to 2013. He was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counselexecutive vice president, general counsel in May 2011 and Secretarysecretary of the Companycompany in June 2011 and served as Senior Vice President, Commercialsenior vice president, commercial and International General Counselinternational general counsel from 2008 until his current appointment. Mr. Nelsen joined Best Buy in 2006 as Vice President, Operationsvice president, operations and International General Counsel.international general counsel. Prior to joining us, he worked at Danka Business Systems PLC, an office products supplier, from 1997 to 2006 and served in various roles, including chief administration officer and general counsel. Prior to his time at Danka, Mr. Nelsen held the role of vice president, legal from 1995 to 1997 at NordicTrack, Inc., a provider of leisure equipment products. Mr. Nelsen began his career in 1989 as a practicing attorney with Best and Flanagan, LLP, a law firm located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Nelsen is a member of the board of directors of NuShoe, Inc., a privately held shoe repair facility in San Diego, California.

Greg Revelle Asheesh Saksenajoined us in November 2014 as is our Chief MarketingStrategic Growth Officer. In this role, Mr. Revellehe leads the company’s efforts to refine and implement our growth strategy. He also is responsible for marketing strategy, brandingstrategic planning across the company. A highly strategic leader with more than 20 years of experience in creating and execution across all consumer touch points both in-store and online. Functional areas include branding, offline and online advertising, customer relationship management, strategy, customer loyalty, enterprise research and analytics and financial services. Prior to joiningleading strategic growth, Mr. Saksena joined Best Buy Mr. Revellein June 2016. He previously served as Chief Marketing Officerthe executive vice president of strategy and new business development from 2011 to 2016 at AutoNation,Cox Communications, one of the largest automotive retailer in the United States from2012nation’s leading cable television providers. Prior to 2014. While there, he led a major overhaul of AutoNation’s marketing organization and platform, consolidating 15 regional brands into one unified national brand, rebuilding the

20

Table of Contents

company’s online marketing and e-commerce teams, and launching new web and mobile e-commerce platforms. Before that, he was Vicethe deputy chief strategy officer from 2008 until 2011 for Time Warner Cable. He has also held leadership roles at Accenture and Tata Group.

Trish Walker was appointed our President, Services in April 2016. In this role, she oversees all services in stores, online and in customers’ homes. That includes the Geek Squad, a national tech-support organization with more than 20,000 agents dedicated to helping customers learn about and enjoy their technology, as well as the company’s service plan portfolio and customer care. Before joining us in 2016, Ms. Walker spent 27 years at Accenture, most recently serving as senior managing director and North America retail practice and global client account lead. Prior to leading the retail practice, she held numerous leadership positions in Accenture’s retail practice, including marketing, operations, SAP and change management. She has worked with many leading retailers over the years, including Nordstrom, CVS, L.L. Bean, Macy’s and The Limited. She also led Accenture’s work on the Best Buy account for several years, during which she worked closely with Geek Squad. Ms. Walker also serves on the advisory board of worldwide online marketing at Expedia Inc., one of the world’s leading online travel companies from 2009 to 2012, and before that held other marketing roles from 2005 to 2009. He also was an investment banker at Credit Suisse from 2000 to 2003.iOwn, LLC, a computer software development company.

Mathew R. Watson has served as Best Buy’swas appointed our Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer sincein October 2017. He previously served as our vice president, controller and chief accounting officer from April 2015.2015 until his current role. Mr. Watson is responsible for our controllership, financial operations and external reporting functions. Mr. Watson has served in the role of Vice President, Financevice president, finance - Controllercontroller since 2014. Prior to that role, he was Vice Presidentvice president - Finance, Domestic Controllerfinance, domestic controller from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Watson was also Senior Director, External Reportingsenior director, external reporting and Corporate Accountingcorporate accounting from 2010 to 2013 and Director, External Reportingdirector, external reporting and Corporate Accountingcorporate accounting beginning in 2007. Prior to joining us in 2005, Mr. Watson worked at KPMG, a professional audit, advisory and tax firm, from 1995 to 2005. He serves on the boards of directors of AchieveMpls and The Best Buy Foundation.



2122

Table of Contents



PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information and Dividends

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol BBY. In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend with respect to shares of our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter. In addition, our Board approved a special dividend that was declared and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Another special dividend that was announced on February 25, 2016 will be paid in the first quartereach of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017. On March 1, 2018, we announced a 32% increase in our regular quarterly dividend to $0.45 per share. Future dividend payments will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by our Board. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange – Composite Index and the dividends declared and paid during the periods indicated.
 Sales Price Dividends Declared and Paid
 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal Year
 High Low High Low 2016 2015
First Quarter$42.00
 $34.13
 $28.20
 $22.30
 $0.74
 $0.17
Second Quarter37.18
 31.68
 32.24
 24.57
 0.23
 0.17
Third Quarter39.10
 28.32
 35.53
 28.80
 0.23
 0.19
Fourth Quarter36.51
 25.31
 40.03
 33.17
 0.23
 0.19
 Sales Price Dividends Declared and Paid
 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal Year
 High Low High Low 2018 2017
First quarter$52.67
 $41.67
 $34.95
 $26.10
 $0.34
 $0.73
Second quarter61.95
 50.29
 33.63
 28.76
 0.34
 0.28
Third quarter63.32
 51.61
 40.58
 32.02
 0.34
 0.28
Fourth quarter78.59
 52.92
 49.40
 37.10
 0.34
 0.28
 
Holders

As of March 21, 2016,29, 2018, there were 2,8392,566 holders of record of our common stock.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

In June 2011,February 2017, our Board authorized up to $5.0a new $5.0 billion of share repurchases, which became effective onrepurchase program that superseded the previous $5.0 billion authorization from June 21, 2011. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 program. AtFebruary 2017 authorization. On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to repurchase $1.5 billion of shares in fiscal 2019, which reflects an updated two-year plan of $3.5 billion compared to the end of fiscal 2015, $4.0original $3.0 billion under this program was available for share repurchases.two-year plan announced on March 1, 2017. During fiscal 2016,2018, we repurchased and retired 32.835.1 million shares at a cost of $1$2.0 billion. At the end of fiscal 2016, approximatelyFebruary 3, 2018, $3.0 billion of the $5.0 billion of share repurchases authorized by our Board in June 2011February 2017 was available for future share repurchases.

In January 2016, Between the end of fiscal 2018 and March 29, 2018, we entered intorepurchased an accelerated share repurchase agreement ("ASR") to purchase $150incremental 3.5 million to $175 millionshares of our common stock. Under the agreement, we paid $175 millionstock at the beginninga cost of the contract and received an initial delivery of 4.4 million shares on January 25, 2016. The ASR agreement was settled on February 17, 2016 for a final notional amount of $165$249 million. Accordingly, we received an additional 1.6 million shares and a cash payment from our counterparty of $10 million equal to the difference between the $175 million up-front payment and the final notional amount.


22

Table of Contents

The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we purchased during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016,2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that we purchased as part of our publicly announced repurchase program and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been repurchasedmay yet be purchased at the end of the applicable fiscal period, pursuant to our June 2011February 2017 $5.0 billion share repurchase program:

Fiscal PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program(1)
Nov. 1, 2015 through Nov. 28, 2015       
     Open market2,377,063
 $31.67
 2,377,063
 $3,525,000,000
Nov. 29, 2015 through Jan. 2, 2016       
     Open market4,677,222
 $30.42
 4,677,222
 $3,383,000,000
Jan. 3, 2016 through Jan. 30, 2016       
     Open market9,963,036
 $27.54
 9,963,036
 $3,109,000,000
     January 2016 ASR4,398,827
 $27.28
 4,398,827
 $2,989,000,000
Total Fiscal 2016 Fourth Quarter21,416,148
 $28.58
 21,416,148
 $2,989,000,000
Fiscal PeriodTotal Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program(1)
Oct. 29, 2017 through Nov. 25, 20173,505,721
 $56.13
 3,505,721
 $3,694,000,000
Nov. 26, 2017 through Dec. 30, 20175,070,197
 $64.00
 5,070,197
 $3,370,000,000
Dec. 31, 2017 through Feb. 3, 20184,672,740
 $73.06
 4,672,740
 $3,029,000,000
Total fiscal 2018 fourth quarter13,248,658
 $65.11
 13,248,658
 $3,029,000,000
(1)
We have a $5.0 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by our board in June 2011. At the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016,2018, there was $3.6$3.9 billion available for share repurchases.repurchases under our February 2017 $5.0 billion share repurchase program. The "Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program" reflects the $612$863 million we purchased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 20162018 pursuant to such program. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 share repurchase program. For additional information, see Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of January 30, 2016:
Plan Category 
Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights(1) (a)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share of Outstanding Options and Rights(2)
(b)
 
Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(3)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 15,703,886 $36.51
 23,933,241
(1)Includes grants of stock options and market-based restricted stock under our 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended, and our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(2)Includes weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.
(3)
Includes 4,343,227 shares of our common stock which have been reserved for issuance under our 2008 and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plans.

23

Table of Contents



Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph

The information contained in this Best Buy Stock Comparative Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ("S&P 500"), of which we are a component, and the Standard & Poor's Retailing Group Industry Index ("S&P Retailing Group"), of which we are also a component. The S&P Retailing Group is a capitalization-weighted index of domestic equities traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ and includes high-capitalization stocks representing the retail sector of the S&P 500.

The graph assumes an investment of $100 at the close of trading on February 25, 2011,2, 2013, the last trading day of fiscal 2011,2013, in our common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P Retailing Group.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Best Buy Co., Inc., the S&P 500 and the S&P Retailing Group

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
Fiscal Year2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Best Buy Co., Inc.$100.00
 $76.88
 $52.95
 $79.14
 $121.15
 $99.87
$100.00
 $149.45
 $228.78
 $188.60
 $307.25
 $516.16
S&P 500100.00
 105.12
 117.67
 142.99
 163.33
 162.25
100.00
 121.52
 138.80
 137.88
 165.51
 209.22
S&P Retailing Group100.00
 118.24
 146.26
 185.65
 222.83
 261.07
100.00
 127.72
 153.64
 184.32
 218.76
 321.37
*Cumulative total return assumes dividend reinvestment.
* Cumulative total return assumes dividend reinvestment.
Source: Research Data Group, Inc.

24

Table of Contents



Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents our selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Five-Year Financial Highlights

$ in millions, except per share amounts
 12-Month 11-Month 12-Month
Fiscal Year 
2016(1)
 
2015(2)
 
2014(4)
 
2013(5)(6)
 
2012(5)(7)
2018(1)(2)
 
2017(3)
 
2016(4)
 
2015(5)
 
2014(6)
Consolidated Statements of Earnings Data                   
Revenue $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
 $38,252
 $43,426
$42,151
 $39,403
 $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Operating income 1,375
 1,450
 1,144
 90
 2,126
1,843
 1,854
 1,375
 1,450
 1,144
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations 807
 1,246
 695
 (259) 1,368
Net earnings from continuing operations999
 1,207
 807
 1,246
 695
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations 90
 (11) (172) (161) (1,346)1
 21
 90
 (11) (172)
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 897
 1,235
 523
 (420) 22
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders 897
 1,233
 532
 (441) (1,231)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests1,000
 1,228
 897
 1,235
 523
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co.,
Inc. shareholders
1,000
 1,228
 897
 1,233
 532
Per Share Data                   
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
 $(0.76) $3.67
Net earnings from continuing operations$3.26
 $3.74
 $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
Net gain (loss) from discontinued operations 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47) (0.54) (6.94)
 0.07
 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47)
Net earnings (loss) 2.56
 3.49
 1.53
 (1.30) (3.27)
Net earnings3.26
 3.81
 2.56
 3.49
 1.53
Cash dividends declared and paid 1.43
 0.72
 0.68
 0.66
 0.62
1.36
 1.57
 1.43
 0.72
 0.68
Common stock price:                   
High 42.00
 40.03
 44.66
 27.95
 33.22
78.59
 49.40
 42.00
 40.03
 44.66
Low 25.31
 22.30
 13.83
 11.20
 21.79
41.67
 26.10
 25.31
 22.30
 13.83
Operating Statistics                   
Comparable sales gain (decline)(8)
 0.5% 0.5% (1.0)% (2.7)% (2.2)%
Comparable sales gain (decline)(7)
5.6% 0.3% 0.5% 0.5% (1.0)%
Gross profit rate 23.3% 22.4% 23.1 % 23.6 % 24.5 %23.4% 24.0% 23.3% 22.4% 23.1 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses rate 19.3% 18.8% 20.0 % 20.7 % 19.5 %19.0% 19.2% 19.3% 18.8% 20.0 %
Operating income rate 3.5% 3.6% 2.8 % 0.2 % 4.9 %4.4% 4.7% 3.5% 3.6% 2.8 %
Year-End Data                   
Current ratio(3)(9)
 1.4
 1.5
 1.4
 1.1
 1.1
Total assets(3)
 $13,519
 $15,245
 $13,990
 $16,774
 $15,994
Debt, including current portion(3)
 1,734
 1,613
 1,647
 2,290
 2,201
Current ratio(8)
1.3
 1.5
 1.4
 1.5
 1.4
Total assets$13,049
 $13,856
 $13,519
 $15,245
 $13,990
Debt, including current portion1,355
 1,365
 1,734
 1,613
 1,647
Total equity 4,378
 5,000
 3,989
 3,715
 4,366
3,612
 4,709
 4,378
 5,000
 3,989
Number of stores                   
Domestic 1,415
 1,448
 1,495
 1,503
 1,447
1,293
 1,363
 1,415
 1,448
 1,495
International 216
 283
 284
 276
 264
216
 212
 216
 283
 284
Total 1,631
 1,731
 1,779
 1,779
 1,711
1,509
 1,575
 1,631
 1,731
 1,779
Retail square footage (000s)          
Retail square footage (in thousands)         
Domestic 41,216
 41,716
 42,051
 42,232
 43,785
40,179
 40,828
 41,216
 41,716
 42,051
International 4,543
 6,470
 6,636
 6,613
 6,814
4,602
 4,511
 4,543
 6,470
 6,636
Total 45,759
 48,186
 48,687
 48,845
 50,599
44,781
 45,339
 45,759
 48,186
 48,687
(1)
(1)Included within operating income, net earnings from continuing operations and net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2018 is $80 million ($51 million net of taxes) related to a one-time bonus for certain employees and $20 million ($13 million net of taxes) related to a one-time contribution to the Best Buy Foundation in response to future tax savings created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("tax reform" or "Tax Act") enacted into law in fiscal 2018. Also included in net earnings from continuing operations and net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2018 is $283 million of charges resulting from the Tax Act. Refer to Note 10, Income Taxes, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

25

Table of Contents



(2)Fiscal 2018 included 53 weeks. All other periods presented included 52 weeks.
(3)
Included within net earnings from continuing operations and net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2017 includes $161 million ($100 million net of taxes) due to cathode ray tube ("CRT") and LCD litigation settlements reached, net of related legal fees and costs. Settlements relate to products purchased and sold in prior fiscal years. Refer to Note 12, Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)
Included within operating income and net earning (loss)earnings from continuing operations for fiscal 2016 is $201 million ($159 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2016 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2016 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from continuing operations. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

25

Table of Contents

(2)(5)Included within net earnings (loss) from continuing operations and net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2015 includes $353 million due to a discrete benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities.
(3)
For fiscal 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 total assets and debt, including current portion are recast to present our retrospective adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-17 Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, ASU 2015-03 Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and ASU 2015-15 Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities. The current ratio for the related fiscal years was also recast to account for the change in balance sheet classification related to the adoption of these ASUs.
(4)(6)Included within operating income and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2014 is $149 million ($95 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2014 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2014 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest)tax) from continuing operations.
(5)Fiscal 2013 (11-month) included 48 weeks and fiscal 2012 included 53 weeks. All other periods presented included 52 weeks.
(6)Included within our operating income and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 (11-month) is $415 million ($268 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2013 (11-month) related to measures we took to restructure our business. Also included in net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2013 (11-month) is $614 million (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges primarily related to Best Buy Canada. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $23 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges primarily related to Best Buy Europe and $207 million (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges related to Five Star. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2013 (11-month) includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from continuing operations and the net of tax goodwill impairment.
(7)Included within our operating income and net earnings (loss) from continuing operations for fiscal 2012 is $48 million ($30 million net of taxes) of restructuring charges from continuing operations recorded in fiscal 2012 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations is $194 million (net of taxes) of restructuring charges recorded in fiscal 2012 related to measures we took to restructure our business. Also included in gain (loss) from discontinued operations for fiscal 2012 is $1.2 billion (net of taxes) of goodwill impairment charges related to Best Buy Europe. Net earnings (loss) attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 2012 includes restructuring charges (net of tax and noncontrolling interest) from both continuing and discontinued operations and the net of tax goodwill impairment, and excludes $1.3 billion in noncontrolling interest related to the agreement to buy out Carphone Warehouse Group plc's interest in the profit share-based management fee paid to Best Buy Europe pursuant to the 2007 Best Buy Mobile agreement (which represents earnings attributable to the noncontrolling interest).
(8)Our comparable sales calculation compares revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to certain other comparable sales channels for a particular period to the corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from the comparable sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquisitions are included in the comparable sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portionCanadian brand consolidation, which included the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the calculationFuture Shop website, had a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, from the first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, all Canadian store and website revenue was removed from the comparable sales attributable to ourbase and the International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The calculation ofno longer had a comparable metric. Therefore, Consolidated comparable sales excludesequaled the Domestic segment comparable sales. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we resumed reporting International comparable sales as revenue in the International segment was once again deemed to be comparable and, as such, Consolidated comparable sales are once again equal to the aggregation of Domestic and International comparable sales. Comparable sales also exclude the impact of the extra week of revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, as well as revenue from discontinued operations. Comparable online sales are included in our comparable sales calculation. The method of calculating comparable sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.2018.
(9)(8)The current ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Unless otherwise noted, transactions and other factors significantly impacting our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity are discussed in order of magnitude. Our MD&A is presented in the following sections:

Overview
Business Strategy
Fiscal 2017 Trends
Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Critical Accounting Estimates
New Accounting Pronouncements

Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a leading provider of technology products, services and solutions. We offer these products and services to the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. We operate two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is

26

Table of Contents

comprised of the operations in all operations withinstates, districts and territories of the U.S. and its districts and territories. The International segment is comprised of all operations outsidein Canada and Mexico.

Our fiscal year ends on the U.S.Saturday nearest the end of January. Fiscal 2018 included 53 weeks with the additional week included in the fourth quarter. Fiscal 2017 and its territories.2016 each included 52 weeks. Our business, like that of many retailers, is seasonal. A higher proportion of our revenue and earnings is generated in the fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday shopping season in the U.S., Canada and Mexico ("Holiday").

Throughout this MD&A, we refer to comparable sales. Our comparable sales calculation compares revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to certain other comparable sales

26

Table of Contents



channels for a particular period to the corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from the comparable sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquisitions are included in the comparable sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The calculation of comparable sales excludes the impact of revenue from discontinued operations, and the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates (applicable to our International segment only). The Canadian brand consolidation, which includes the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the eliminationimpact of the Future Shop website, has a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, all Canadian store and website revenue has been removed from the comparable sales base and the International segment no longer has a comparable metricextra week in fiscal 2016 and the Enterprise comparable sales equals the Domestic segment comparable sales. Enterprise comparable sales for periods presented prior to fiscal 2016 include revenue from our International segment.

2018. The method of calculating comparable sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.

The Canadian brand consolidation, which included the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the Future Shop website, had a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, from the first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, all Canadian store and website revenue was removed from the comparable sales base and the International segment no longer had a comparable metric. Therefore, Consolidated comparable sales equaled the Domestic segment comparable sales. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we resumed reporting International comparable sales as revenue in the International segment was once again deemed to be comparable and, as such, Consolidated comparable sales are once again equal to the aggregation of Domestic and International comparable sales. However, we have not provided International comparable sales for fiscal 2017 as the calculation would only include comparable revenue from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and may be misleading in future periods when used for comparison purposes.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This MD&A includes financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), as well as certain adjusted or non-GAAP financial measures such as constant currency, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP effective tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share ("EPS") from continuing operations and non-GAAP debt to earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent ("EBITDAR") ratio. We believe that non-GAAP financial measures, when reviewed in conjunction with GAAP financial measures, can provide more information to assist investors in evaluating current period performance and in assessing future performance. For these reasons, our internal management reporting also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Generally, our non-GAAP financial measures include adjustments for items such as restructuring charges, goodwill impairments and gains or losses on investments. In addition, certain other items may be excluded from non-GAAP financial measures when we believe this provides greater clarity to management and our investors. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not superior to or as a substitute for, GAAP financial measures. We strongly encourage investors and shareholders to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. Non-GAAP financial measures as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

In our discussions of the operating results of our consolidatedConsolidated business and our International segment, we sometimes refer to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates or the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which are references to the differences between the foreign currency exchange rates we use to convert the International segment’s operating results from local currencies into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The impact ofWe also use the term "constant currency," which represents results adjusted to exclude foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is typically calculatedimpacts. We calculate those impacts as the difference between the current period activityresults translated using the current period’speriod currency exchange rates and using the comparable prior-year period’sprior period currency exchange rates. We use this method to calculatebelieve the impactdisclosure of revenue changes in foreignconstant currency exchangecan provide useful supplementary information to investors in light of significant fluctuations in currency rates and our inability to report comparable store sales for all countries where the functional currency is notInternational segment from the U.S. dollar.first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017 as a result of the Canadian brand consolidation.

InBeginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we no longer exclude non-restructuring property and equipment impairment charges from our discussionsnon-GAAP financial metrics. When we began to execute our Renew Blue transformation in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we adopted a change to non-GAAP reporting to exclude non-restructuring property and equipment impairment charges from our non-GAAP results. From that point, through the operatingfourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we believed that reporting non-GAAP results below, we sometimes refer to the impact of net new stores on our results of operations. The key factors that dictate the impact that the net new stores have on our operating results include: (i) store opening and closing decisions; (ii) the size and format of new stores, as we operate stores ranging from approximately 1,000 square feet to approximately 50,000 square feet; (iii) the length of time the stores were open during the period; and (iv) the overall success of new store launches.

When assessing our performance in consumer electronics categories against other retailers, we often reference The NPD Group's ("NPD") Weekly Tracking Service for the appropriate period. NPD defines the consumer electronics industry as including televisions, desktop and notebook computers, tablets not including Kindle, digital imaging and other categories. Sales ofexcluded these products represent approximately 65%charges provided a supplemental view of our Domestic segment revenueongoing performance that was useful and relevant to our investors. Now that Renew Blue has ended and Best Buy 2020: Building The New Blue has officially launched, we believe it is no longer necessary to adjust for non-restructuring property and equipment impairments in fiscal 2016. The data does not include mobile phones, appliances, services, gaming, Apple watch, movies or music.

This MD&A includes financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally acceptedour non-GAAP reporting. We believe that future such impairments will predominantly be immaterial and incurred in the United States ("GAAP"), as well as certain adjusted orordinary scope of ongoing operations. Accordingly, commencing in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we no longer adjust for non-restructuring property and equipment impairments. Impacted prior period non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP effective tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations and adjusted debthave been recast to earnings before goodwill impairment, interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent ("EBITDAR") ratio. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measureconform with this presentation.


27

Table of financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP measures as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.Contents



We believe that the non-GAAP measures described above provide meaningful supplemental information to assist shareholders in understanding our financial results and assessing our prospects for future performance. Management believes adjusted operating income, adjusted effective tax rate, adjusted net earnings from continuing operations and adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations are important indicators of our operations because they exclude items that may not be indicative of, or are unrelated to, our core operating results and provide a baseline for analyzing trends in our underlying businesses. Management makes standard adjustments for items such as restructuring charges, goodwill impairments, non-restructuring asset impairments and gains or losses on investments, as well as adjustments for other items that may arise during the period and have a meaningful impact on comparability. Refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section below for the detailed reconciliation of items that impacted the non-GAAP measuresoperating income, non-GAAP effective tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and non-GAAP diluted EPS from continuing operations in the presented periods.

Refer to the Other Financial Measures section below for the detailed reconciliation of items that impacted the non-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio. Management believes our

27

Table of Contents

adjusted debt to EBITDARthis ratio is an important indicator of our creditworthiness. BecauseFurthermore, we believe that our non-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio is important for understanding our financial measures are not standardized,position and provides meaningful additional information about our ability to service our long-term debt and other fixed obligations and to fund our future growth. We also believe our non-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio is relevant because it may not be possibleenables investors to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the sameour indebtedness to that of retailers who own, rather than lease, their stores. Our decision to own or similar names. These non-GAAP financial measures arelease real estate is based on an additional way of viewing aspectsassessment of our operations that, when viewed withfinancial liquidity, our GAAP resultscapital structure, our desire to own or to lease the location, the owner’s desire to own or to lease the location and the reconciliationsalternative that results in the highest return to corresponding GAAP financial measures within our discussion of consolidated performance below, provide a more complete understanding of our business. We strongly encourage investors and shareholders to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.shareholders.

Business Strategy

On a full year basis, fiscal 2016 marked the second year in a rowIn November 2012, we introduced our transformation strategy called Renew Blue. Since then we have stabilized comparable sales and increased our Domestic segment revenueprofitability. In fiscal 2018, we declared Renew Blue complete and expandedunveiled a new strategy: Best Buy 2020: Building the New Blue.

Customers are at the core of Best Buy 2020. Technology continues to evolve, opening an increasing range of possibilities for our operating margin. Wecustomers. It is also continued to make significant progress against our Renew Blue strategy. During the year,creating more complexity and we continued to gain share in appliances and nearly allbelieve many of our traditional consumer electronics categories. We grew the Domestic segment online revenue 13% to over $4 billion, or 11% of total Domestic segment revenue in fiscal 2016. We increasedcustomers need our Net Promoter Score ("NPS") by over 300 basis points. We continued to improve our employee engagement scores and decreased employee turnover. We deepened our partnerships with the top tech companies in the world. We delivered $150 million against our $400 million Renew Blue Phase 2 cost reduction and gross profit optimization program. We consolidated brands and embarked on a significant transformation in Canada, including the closure of 68 stores. And finally, in one year, we returned $1.5 billion in cash to our shareholders, including $1 billion in share repurchases, which was originally planned to be completed over three years.

Fiscal 2017 Priorities

Turning to fiscal 2017, we are entering the next phasehelp. The purpose of our Renew Blue strategy. Our purpose from a customer standpointstrategy is to build a company that does a unique job of helpinghelp our customers learn aboutenrich their lives through technology. We believe we can do this by focusing on customers’ underlying needs, such as entertainment, communications, security and enjoy the latest technology. As we begin this next phase in fiscal 2017, we will focus on the following priorities: (1) building on our strong industry position and multi-channel capabilities to drive the existing business; (2) driving cost reduction and efficiencies; and (3) advancing key initiatives to drive future growth and differentiation.

Our first priority is to build on our strong industry position and multi-channel capabilities to drive the existing business. More specifically, we plan to implement a number of initiatives across merchandising, marketing, digital, stores, services, and supply chain.

Our second priority for fiscal 2017 is to reduce cost and drive efficiencies throughout the business. Reducing costs is essential for us to be able to fund our investments, build our resilience to product cycles and increase our profitability over time. Furthermore, based on current economic factors and softness in the consumer electronics industry, it is essential that we be proactive on the cost reduction front.

A key element of our approach to achieving this is to simplify our core business processes to simultaneously improve the customer experience and drive costs out. As an example, we have a project focused on reducing the amount of open box appliances we take into our stores by addressing root cause issues. This project has the potential to not only improve the customer experience but also to drive material savings through lower markdowns, lower transportation costs and better use of labor in our stores and distribution centers.

More broadly, we aspire to deliver world-class operational performance, defined in terms of quality, service and cost. This focus has to be a way of life, especially given our margin structure and the volatility of our industry. In fiscal 2016, we announced a specific cost reduction and gross profit optimization program called Renew Blue Phase 2, with a goal of $400 million over three years on top of the $1 billion we eliminated as part of Phase 1 in fiscal 2015.

Against that goal, in fiscal 2016, we achieved $150 million of annualized savings leaving us with $250 million remaining. In light of our increased focus on cost and productivity, we believe there are incremental savings that can be achieved above and beyond our current goal. Partially offsetting these savings, however, will be our expected future investments in the areas of labor expertise, services pricing and key growth initiatives. In fiscal 2016, these investments totaled approximately $100 million and we expect a similar level in fiscal 2017, which again will be funded by our cost savings.

Our third priority is to advance key initiatives to more deeply transform our company in order to drive future growth and differentiation. While there may be short-term pressures, wehealth. We continue to believe we operate in anhave a material opportunity rich environment. The Internet of Things is providing a new technology wave and is making our operating model increasingly relevant to customers.

28

Table of Contents


We are investing to begrow the leading technology expert who makes it easy to learn about and confidently enjoy the best technology. In this context, we believe we have ongoing growth opportunities around key product categories, as well as from increasing our share of wallet with existing customers and acquiring new customers within our target segment who are passionate about technology and need help with it. Our Services capabilities and Geek Squad are key building blocks of this strategy. While it is not visible in our services top line results today, we are making progress to bring these opportunities to life.

Over the last two years, we have improved many aspects of our extended service plan and repair operations. We have also had to adjust our pricing of our extended service plans. We are seeing the results of our efforts through substantial increases in NPS, higher total customer interactions and from a financial point of view, the periodic profit sharing payments we earned this year. We are also beginning to see improving attach rates as we enter fiscal 2017.

Building on this foundational work, we will continue our work to improve the customer experience and enhance our service offering and capabilities, in support of our mission to help customers learn about and enjoy the latest technology. While we are energized by the potential of this opportunity, the work necessary to capture it takes time. Thus, fiscal 2017 will be another year of gradual and incremental improvement, with more meaningful results expected in fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2017 Trends

We believe that the consumer electronics industry willcompany. Technology innovations continue to be characterized by product innovation cycles. We are undeterred by this fact - asvibrant and exciting and we believe there will always be technology innovation. Our imperative is, that in these cycles, we continue to deliver superior execution against what is in our control, recognizing that the cycles rarely align at any point in time.market offers room for differentiation.

In fiscal 2017, we are focused on continuing to build on our foundation to both drive and capitalize on these technology cycles. In parallel, we are focused on building the key initiatives outlined above that we believe will result in stronger relationships with our customers, provide profitable revenue even during down cycles and continue to create long-term shareholder value.

Over time, as the fruit of these key initiatives materialize, we expect to accelerate our revenue and operating income growth by taking advantage of opportunities provided by ongoing technology innovation and the need customers have for help. In the short-term, we expect to be characterized by our strong cash flow generating capabilities and our intent to regularly return excess free cash flow to shareholders.

From a financial outlook perspective, for fiscal 2017, based on current industry dynamics and how we see the various product cycles playing out in our Domestic segment, we are expecting revenue declines in the first half followed by growth in the back half. We also expect that our strong execution and operational capabilities will allow us to continue to gain market share. InAgainst this context we are targeting flat Domestic segment revenue for the full fiscal year due to continued growth in appliances, connected home and home theater in particular, but recognize that it will be challenging without a strong mobile cycle and improvements in the NPD-reported categories overall.

Despite the soft revenue environment, we will target approximately flat operating income, including the lapping of the significant periodic profit sharing benefits from our services plan portfolio that we earned in fiscal 2016. A key element to achieve this will be the delivery of our cost reduction and gross profit optimization initiatives. In addition,backdrop, we intend to rewardfulfill our shareholderspurpose and grow the company by being a premium dividend payerexpanding what we sell, evolving how we sell and increasingbuilding key enablers, all while continuing to reduce costs. To these ends, in fiscal 2018, we expanded our EPS through ongoing share repurchases.

After three consecutive yearsIn-Home Advisor program, introduced our Total Tech Support offering, continued to enhance associate proficiency, and continued to improve and simplify the online buying process for our customers. We invested in enterprise customer relationship management capabilities and continued to develop our services platform. We also began investing in the transformation of strong cash flow generation underour supply chain, while continuing to make progress on our productivity goals. Based on early results, as outlined in the Renew BlueResults of Operations, section below, we believe now is an ideal time to provide a view of our long-term capital allocation strategy. This strategy is based on our strong cash position today and our ongoing confidence in our future cash-flow generation. At the core of this strategy is our intent to first fund our operations and growth investments, including potential acquisitions, and then to return the remaining excess free cash flow to our shareholders, over time, through dividends and share repurchases, while maintaining investment grade credit metrics. This strategy targets the return of excess free cash flow to shareholders through a 35% to 45% non-GAAP dividend payout ratio (defined as dividends divided by non-GAAP net earnings) and regular share repurchases with a minimum annual expectation of offsetting dilution from equity compensation.working.

In line with this strategy, our fiscal 2017 return of capital plan includes (1) a 22% increase in the regular quarterly dividend to $0.28 per share; (2) the intent to repurchase $1 billion worth of shares over the next two years; and (3) a special dividend of $0.45 per share, or approximately $145 million. This is in addition to the $1.5 billion in cash we returned to shareholders in fiscal 2016.


29


Results of Operations

In order to align our fiscal reporting periods and comply with statutory filing requirements, in certain foreign jurisdictions, we consolidate the financial results of our Mexico operations, as well as our discontinued China and Europe operations on a one-month lag. Consistent with such consolidation, the financial and non-financial information presented in our MD&A relative to these operations is also presented on a lag. Our policy is to accelerate the recording of events occurring in the lag period that significantly affect our consolidated financial statements. ThereNo such events were no significant intervening events which would have materially affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or other factors had they been recorded during fiscal 2016.

Discontinued Operations Presentationidentified for the periods presented.

The results of mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. ("mindSHIFT") in our Domestic segment and Best Buy Europe andJiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Limited ("Five Star"), in our International segment, are presented as discontinued operations inon our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Unless otherwise stated, financial results discussed herein refer to continuing operations.

Domestic Segment Installment Billing PlansFiscal 2018 included 53 weeks, and fiscal 2017 and 2016 included 52 weeks.

In April 2014, we began to sell installment billing plans offered by mobile carriers to our customers to complement the more traditional two-year plans. While the two types of contracts have broadly similar overall economics, installment billing plans typically generate higher revenues due to higher proceeds for devices and higher cost of sales due to lower device subsidies. As we increase our mix of installment billing plans, there is an associated increase in revenue and cost of goods sold and a decrease in gross profit rate, with gross profit dollars relatively unaffected. This change in plan offer does not impact our International segment.

The following table presents our Domestic and Enterprise comparable sales and the estimated benefit of installment billing for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
 
January 30, 2016(1)
 January 31, 2015
Domestic   
Comparable sales % gain0.5 % 1.0%
Estimated benefit of installment billing0.6 % 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding estimated impact of installment billing(0.1)% 0.5%
    
Enterprise   
Comparable sales % gain0.5 % 0.5%
Estimated benefit of installment billing0.6 % 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding estimated impact of installment billing(0.1)% %

(1)The Canadian brand consolidation, which included the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the Future Shop website, has a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, all Canadian store and website revenue has been removed from the comparable sales base and the International segment no longer has a comparable metric in fiscal 2016 and the Enterprise comparable sales equals the Domestic segment comparable sales. Enterprise comparable sales for periods presented prior to fiscal 2016 include revenue from our International segment.

Consolidated Results

Fiscal 2016 Summary

Fiscal 2016 included net earnings from continuing operations of $0.8 billion, compared to $1.2 billion in fiscal 2015. Net earnings in fiscal 2016 included $201 million of restructuring charges, while fiscal 2015 included a $353 million discrete tax benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities. Earnings per diluted share from continuing operations was $2.30 in fiscal 2016, compared to $3.53 in fiscal 2015.
Revenue was $39.5 billion in fiscal 2016 a decrease of $811 million compared to fiscal 2015. The decrease was driven by the International segment and related to the negative impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations and the negative impact of Canadian store closures.

3028


Our gross profit rate increased by 0.9% of revenue to 23.3% of revenue in fiscal 2016. The increase was primarily due to a periodic profit sharing benefit based on performance of our externally-managed extended service plan portfolio and cathode ray tube and liquid crystal display ("CRT/LCD") related legal settlements received.
We generated $1.3 billion in operating cash flow in fiscal 2016, compared to $1.9 billion in fiscal 2015, and we ended fiscal 2016 with $3.3 billion of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, compared to $3.9 billion at the end of fiscal 2015.
During fiscal 2016, we made four dividend payments totaling $1.43 per share, or $499 million in the aggregate.
Consolidated Results

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions, except per share amounts):
Consolidated Performance Summary 2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Revenue $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
$42,151
 $39,403
 $39,528
Revenue % gain (decline) (2.0)% (0.7)% 6.2 %7.0% (0.3)% (2.0)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
 0.5 % 0.5 % (1.0)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
 (0.1)%  % (1.0)%
Comparable sales % gain (1)
5.6% 0.3 % 0.5 %
Comparable sales % decline, excluding estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
n/a
 n/a
 (0.1)%
Restructuring charges - cost of goods sold $3
 $
 $
$
 $
 $3
Gross profit $9,191
 $9,047
 $9,399
$9,876
 $9,440
 $9,191
Gross profit as a % of revenue(3)
 23.3 % 22.4 % 23.1 %23.4% 24.0 % 23.3 %
SG&A $7,618
 $7,592
 $8,106
$8,023
 $7,547
 $7,618
SG&A as a % of revenue 19.3 % 18.8 % 20.0 %19.0% 19.2 % 19.3 %
Restructuring charges $198
 $5
 $149
$10
 $39
 $198
Operating income $1,375
 $1,450
 $1,144
$1,843
 $1,854
 $1,375
Operating income as a % of revenue 3.5 % 3.6 % 2.8 %4.4% 4.7 % 3.5 %
Net earnings from continuing operations $807
 $1,246
 $695
$999
 $1,207
 $807
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations(4)
 $90
 $(13) $(163)
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $897
 $1,233
 $532
Gain from discontinued operations(4)
$1
 $21
 $90
Net earnings$1,000
 $1,228
 $897
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
$3.26
 $3.74
 $2.30
Diluted earnings per share $2.56
 $3.49
 $1.53
$3.26
 $3.81
 $2.56
(1)EnterpriseThe Canadian brand consolidation that was initiated in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 had a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the Canadian retail stores and website. As such, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, all store and website revenue was removed from the comparable sales base, and an International segment (comprised of Canada and Mexico) comparable sales metric has not been provided. Therefore, Consolidated comparable sales for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 includes2017 include revenue from continuing operations in the Domestic segment for the International segment. Excludingfull year and the International segment Enterprisefor the fourth quarter only, and Consolidated comparable sales for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, excluding2016 equal the Domestic segment comparable sales. Comparable sales also exclude the impact of installment billing, would have been 0.5% and (0.4%), respectively, or equal to Domestic comparable sales excluding the impact of installment billing, for the same period.extra week in fiscal 2018.
(2)Represents comparable sales, excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing. In fiscal 2015, we began selling installment billing plans offered by mobile carriers to our customers to complement the more traditional two-year plans. While the two types of contracts have broadly similar overall economics, installment billing plans typically generate higher revenues due to higher proceeds for devices and higher cost of sales due to lower device subsidies. As we increased our mix of installment billing plans, we had an associated increase in revenue and cost of goods sold and a decrease in gross profit rate, with gross profit dollars relatively unaffected. This change in plan offer did not impact our International segment. Beginning in fiscal 2017, we no longer reported comparable sales, excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing, as the mix of installment billing plans became comparable on a year-over-year basis.
(3)
Because retailers vary in how they record costs of operating their supply chain between cost of goods sold and SG&A, our gross profit rate and SG&A rate may not be comparable to other retailers' corresponding rates. For additional information regarding costs classified in cost of goods sold and SG&A, refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)Includes both gain (loss) from discontinued operations and net (earnings) lossearnings from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.operations.

Fiscal 20162018 Results Compared With Fiscal 20152017

Consolidated revenue of $42.2 billion in fiscal 2018 increased 7.0% compared to fiscal 2017. Fiscal 2018 includes approximately $760 million of revenue from the extra week. The components of the 2.0%7.0% revenue decreaseincrease in fiscal 20162018 were as follows:
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuationsComparable sales impact(1.35.3)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
(1.11.5)%
Comparable sales impactImpact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations0.40.2%
Total revenue decreaseincrease(2.07.0)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity, including the Canadian brand consolidation activity,impact of the extra week in fiscal 2018, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit sharing benefits,profit-share revenue, certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.


3129


Our gross profit rate increased 0.9% of revenue in fiscal 2016. Our Domestic segment contributed a rate increase of 0.9% of revenue and there was no change in our International segment. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

The SG&A rate increased 0.5% of revenue in fiscal 2016. Our Domestic segment contributed a rate increase of 0.5% of revenue and there was no change in our International segment. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

SG&A restructuring charges increased from $5 million in fiscal 2015 to $198 million in fiscal 2016. Our International segment drove this increase. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A restructuring charges, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

Our operating income decreased $75 million, and our operating income as a percent of revenue decreased to 3.5% of revenue in fiscal 2016, compared to operating income of 3.6% of revenue in fiscal 2015. The decrease in our operating income was primarily due to an increase in restructuring charges partially offset by net CRT/LCD legal settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2016.

Fiscal 2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2014

The components of the 0.7% revenue decrease in fiscal 2015 were as follows:
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(0.7)%
Net store changes(0.2)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
(0.2)%
Comparable sales impact0.4 %
Total revenue decrease(0.7)%
(1)
Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

Our gross profit rate decreased 0.7%by 0.6% of revenue in fiscal 2015.2018. Our Domestic and International segmentssegment contributed a rate decrease of 0.6%0.4% of revenue, and 0.1%while our International segment contributed a rate decrease of revenue, respectively.0.2%. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

The SG&A rate decreased 1.2%by 0.2% of revenue in fiscal 2015.2018. Our Domestic and International segments both contributed a rate decrease of 1.1% of revenue and 0.1% of revenue, respectively.revenue. For further discussion of each segment's SG&A rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

We recorded restructuringRestructuring charges of $149decreased from $39 million in fiscal 2014, comprised of $1232017 to $10 million in fiscal 2018. The fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 activity primarily related to our Domestic segment and $26 million in our International segment. TheseFor further discussion of each segment's restructuring charges, resultedsee Segment Performance Summary, below.

Our operating income decreased $11 million and our operating income as a percent of revenue decreased to 4.4% of revenue in afiscal 2018, compared to operating income of 4.7% of revenue in fiscal 2017. The decrease in our operating income was primarily due to a decrease in our gross profit rate and an increase in SG&A.

Fiscal 2017 Results Compared With Fiscal 2016

Consolidated revenue of $39.4 billion in fiscal 20142017 decreased 0.3% compared to fiscal 2016. The components of 0.4%the 0.3% revenue decrease in fiscal 2017 were as follows:
Comparable sales impact0.2 %
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(0.2)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
(0.3)%
Total revenue decrease(0.3)%
(1)
Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue in our International segment for the first through third quarters of fiscal 2017, net store opening and closing activity, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit share revenue, certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

Our gross profit rate increased 0.7% of revenue in fiscal 2017. Our Domestic segment contributed a rate increase of 0.5% of revenue, while our International segment contributed 0.2%. For further discussion of each segment's gross profit rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

The SG&A rate remained flat on a year-over-year basis with both Domestic and International segments contributing flat year-over-year SG&A as a percentage of revenue. We recorded an immaterial amountFor further discussion of restructuringeach segment's SG&A rate changes, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

Restructuring charges decreased from $198 million in fiscal 2015.2016 to $39 million in fiscal 2017. The fiscal 2017 activity primarily related to our Domestic segment, while our fiscal 2016 activity was driven by our International segment. For further discussion of each segment’s restructuring charges, see Segment Performance Summary, below.

Our operating income increased $306$479 million and our operating income as a percent of revenue increased to 3.6%4.7% of revenue in fiscal 2015,2017, compared to operating income of 2.8%3.5% of revenue in fiscal 2014.2016. The increase in our operating income was primarily due to an increase in our gross profit rate and a decrease in SG&A andour restructuring charges, partially offset by LCD legal settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2014.activity.


3230




Segment Performance Summary

Domestic Segment

The following table presents selected financial data for our Domestic segment for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
Domestic Segment Performance Summary2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Revenue$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
$38,662
 $36,248
 $36,365
Revenue gain %0.9 % 0.6% 7.9 %
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
0.5 % 1.0% (0.4)%
Comparable sales % gain (decline) excluding the estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
(0.1)% 0.5% (0.4)%
Revenue % gain (decline)6.7% (0.3)% 0.9 %
Comparable sales % gain(1)
5.6% 0.2 % 0.5 %
Comparable sales % decline, excluding the estimated impact of installment billing(1)(2)
n/a
 n/a
 (0.1)%
Gross profit$8,484
 $8,080
 $8,274
$9,065
 $8,650
 $8,484
Gross profit as % of revenue23.3 % 22.4% 23.1 %23.4% 23.9 % 23.3 %
SG&A$6,897
 $6,639
 $7,006
$7,304
 $6,855
 $6,897
SG&A as % of revenue19.0 % 18.4% 19.6 %18.9% 18.9 % 19.0 %
Restructuring charges$2
 $4
 $123
$9
 $31
 $2
Operating income$1,585
 $1,437
 $1,145
$1,752
 $1,764
 $1,585
Operating income as % of revenue4.4 % 4.0% 3.2 %4.5% 4.9 % 4.4 %
          
Selected Online Revenue Data:     
Selected Online Revenue Data     
Online revenue as a % of total segment revenue
11.0 % 9.8% 8.5 %15.5% 13.4 % 11.0 %
Comparable online sales % gain(1)
13.5 % 16.7% 19.8 %21.8% 20.8 % 13.5 %
(1)Comparable online sales gain is included in the total comparable sales gain (decline) above.gain. Comparable sales also exclude the impact of the extra week in fiscal 2018.
(2)Represents comparable sales, excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing. In fiscal 2015, we began selling installment billing plans offered by mobile carriers to our customers to complement the more traditional two-year plans. While the two types of contracts have broadly similar overall economics, installment billing plans typically generate higher revenues due to higher proceeds for devices and higher cost of sales due to lower device subsidies. As we increased our mix of installment billing plans, we had an associated increase in revenue and cost of goods sold and a decrease in gross profit rate, with gross profit dollars relatively unaffected. Beginning in fiscal 2017, we no longer reported comparable sales, excluding the estimated revenue benefit from installment billing, as the mix of installment billing plans became comparable on a year-over-year basis.

The following table reconciles our Domestic segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years:
Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

 
Stores
Opened

 
Stores
Closed

 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

 
Stores
Opened

 
Stores
Closed

 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year

Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 
Stores
Opened
 
Stores
Closed
 
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Best Buy1,055
 
 (5) 1,050
 
 (13) 1,037
1,037
 
 (11) 1,026
 
 (18) 1,008
Best Buy Mobile stand-alone406
 1
 (40) 367
 
 (17) 350
350
 
 (41) 309
 
 (52) 257
Pacific Sales30
 
 (1) 29
 
 (1) 28
28
 
 
 28
 
 
 28
Magnolia Audio Video4
 
 (2) 2
 
 (2) 
Total Domestic segment stores1,495
 1
 (48) 1,448
 
 (33) 1,415
1,415
 
 (52) 1,363
 
 (70) 1,293

We continuously monitor store performance. As we approach the expiration date of our stores leases, we evaluate various options for each location, including whether a store should remain open. On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to close all of our 257 remaining Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in the U.S. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

Fiscal 20162018 Results Compared With Fiscal 20152017

We offerDomestic segment revenue of $38.7 billion in fiscal 2018 increased 6.7% compared to the prior year and includes approximately $715 million of revenue from the extra week. The components of the 6.7% revenue increase in the Domestic segment in fiscal 2018 were as follows:

31




Comparable sales impact5.3%
Non-comparable sales(1)
1.4%
Total revenue increase6.7%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of the extra week in fiscal 2018, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit-share revenue, credit card revenue, gift card breakage, commercial sales and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers. Non-comparable sales also reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity of (0.7)% in fiscal 2018.

The profit-share revenue included in our non-comparable sales relates to our extended warranty protection plans that are managed by third party insurers.a third-party underwriter. We may also be eligible to receive profit-sharing payments, depending on the performance of the portfolio. When performance of the portfolio is strong and the claims cost to the third party insurerthird-party underwriter declines, we are entitled to share in the excess profits.premiums. In fiscal 2016,2018, we recognized $148$59 million of such profit-share revenue, with an equal impact to gross profit and operating income. We excludeIn fiscal 2017, we recognized $110 million of such profit-share revenue. The fiscal 2018 profit-share revenue decrease from comparable sales calculations. The amount recognized in fiscal 2016 was substantially higher than for prior periods. The unusually strong performance of the portfolio for fiscal 2016, which particularly related to mobile phones, was due to changes2017 reflects reductions to the design of our extended service plans, improvements to our repair and fulfillment operations and industry trends. These trends have also led to lower revenues from repairs we undertake on behalf of the insurers, as discussed further below. The premiums that we pay to insurers are periodically adjusted to reflect such trends and consequentlythe third-party underwriter. In light of the continued impact of these lower premiums, we do not expect profit sharethe profit-share payments to continue at this levelto decrease in future periods.

33



Domestic segment revenue of $36.4 billion inIn fiscal 2016 increased 0.9% compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily driven by a comparable sales growth of 0.5%, which included an estimated 0.6% of revenue benefit associated with installment billing and a periodic profit sharing benefit based on performance of our externally managed extended service plan portfolio.

2018, Domestic segment online revenue of $4.0$6.0 billion increased 13.5%21.8% on a comparable basis, primarily due to higher conversion rates and increased traffic. As a percentage of total Domestic revenue, online revenue increased 120 basis points to 11.0%15.5% versus 9.8%13.4% last year.

The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2018 and 2017:
 Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
 Year Ended Year Ended
 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Consumer Electronics33% 34% 3.1% 5.0 %
Computing and Mobile Phones45% 45% 5.3% (1.8)%
Entertainment8% 7% 12.6% (13.8)%
Appliances10% 9% 11.4% 7.8 %
Services4% 5% 4.0% (3.3)%
Total100% 100% 5.6% 0.2 %

We believe the strong execution of our business strategy, combined with better product availability, a continued healthy consumer confidence, positive macro conditions and a favorable competitive environment contributed to our Domestic comparable sales growth across most of our categories. The following is a description of the notable comparable sales changes in our Domestic segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 3.1% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by smart home, home theater, headphones and voice assistants, partially offset by declines in health and fitness.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 5.3% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by computing, mobile phones and wearables, partially offset by declines in tablets.
Entertainment: The 12.6% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by gaming hardware.
Appliances: The 11.4% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by large and small appliances.
Services: The 4.0% comparable sales gain was primarily driven by continued growth in our warranty business, and higher installation and delivery services.

Our Domestic segment experienced a decrease in gross profit rate to 23.4% in fiscal 2018 from 23.9% in fiscal 2017. This rate decrease was primarily due to the $183 million of cathode ray tube ("CRT") settlement proceeds recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and a decrease in our periodic profit-share revenue as described above, partially offset by improved margin rates across multiple categories.

Our Domestic segment SG&A rate remained flat at 18.9% of revenue in fiscal 2018 compared to the prior year. SG&A increased in fiscal 2018 due to (1) higher incentive compensation for store and corporate employees, (2) investments in growth initiatives, (3) the impact of the extra week, (4) one-time expenses related to tax reform, which included $75 million related to employee bonus expense and a $20 million charitable donation to the Best Buy Foundation, and (5) higher variable costs due to

32




increased revenue. These increases were offset by cost reductions and $22 million in CRT settlement legal fees incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 that did not recur in fiscal 2018.

Our Domestic segment incurred $9 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2018 and $31 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2017. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2018 related to the Best Buy Mobile plan that began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, whereas the charges in fiscal 2017 related primarily to the Renew Blue Phase 2 plan that began in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.
Our Domestic segment’s operating income decreased $12 million in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. In addition, the operating income rate decreased to 4.5% of revenue in fiscal 2018 compared to 4.9% of revenue in the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by the gross profit rate decline and increase in SG&A described above.
Fiscal 2017 Results Compared With Fiscal 2016

Domestic segment revenue of $36.2 billion in fiscal 2017 decreased 0.3% compared to the prior year. The components of the 0.9%0.3% revenue increasedecrease in the Domestic segment in fiscal 20162017 were as follows:
Comparable sales impact0.50.2%
Non-comparable sales(1)
0.4(0.5)%
Total revenue increasedecrease0.9(0.3)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as profit sharing benefits,share revenue, credit card revenue, gift card breakage, commercial sales and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers.

The net store changes did not have a material impact on our revenue in fiscal 2017, as the majority of closures related to our small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores. The closing of small-format Best Buy Mobile stores have a significantly smaller impact given their smaller size and limited category focus compared to our large-format stores.
The profit-share revenue included in our non-comparable sales relates to our extended warranty protection plans that are managed by a third-party underwriter. We may be eligible to receive profit-sharing payments, depending on the performance of the portfolio. When performance of the portfolio is strong and the claims cost to the third-party underwriter declines, we are entitled to share in the excess premiums. In fiscal 2017, we recognized $110 million of such profit-share revenue, with an equal impact to gross profit and operating income. In fiscal 2016, we recognized $148 million of such profit-share revenue. The fiscal 2017 profit-share revenue decrease from fiscal 2016 reflects reductions to the premiums that we pay to the third-party underwriter. In light of the continued impact of these lower premiums, we expect the profit-share payments to continue to decrease in future periods.

In fiscal 2017, Domestic segment online revenue of $4.8 billion increased 20.8% on a comparable basis, primarily due to higher conversion rates and increased traffic. As a percentage of total Domestic revenue, online revenue increased to 13.4% versus 11.0% in fiscal 2016.

The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 20162017 and 2015:
2016:
Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales SummaryRevenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
Year Ended Year EndedYear Ended Year Ended
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Consumer Electronics32% 31% 4.7 % 3.7 %34% 32% 5.0 % 4.7 %
Computing and Mobile Phones46% 47% (2.6)% (0.6)%45% 46% (1.8)% (2.6)%
Entertainment8% 9% (3.6)% 4.5 %7% 8% (13.8)% (3.6)%
Appliances8% 7% 15.4 % 7.5 %9% 8% 7.8 % 15.4 %
Services5% 5% (11.6)% (11.1)%5% 5% (3.3)% (11.6)%
Other1% 1% n/a
 n/a
% 1% n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% 0.5 % 1.0 %100% 100% 0.2 % 0.5 %

33




The following is a description of the notable comparable sales changes in our Domestic segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 4.7%5.0% comparable sales increase was primarily due to an increase in the sales of connected home products, streaming devices and large screen televisions, the expansion of Magnolia Design Center stores-within-a-store, and expanded assortment of streaming devices. This increase was partially offset by industry declines in point and shoot cameras and lower sales in small and mid-size televisions.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 2.6%1.8% comparable sales decline was primarily due to continued industry declines in tablets and product constraints in, and to a lesser extenteffect, lower demand forsales of mobile phones. This decline was partially offset by an increase in the sale of computers.
Entertainment: The 3.6%13.8% comparable sales decreasedecline was driven by declines in gaming, music and movies due to continued industry declines as well as declines in gaming hardware.declines.
Appliances: The 15.4%7.8% comparable sales gain was a result of continued growth in major appliances sales as well as the expansion of Pacific Kitchen & Home stores-within-a-store.both large and small appliance sales.
Services: The 11.6%3.3% comparable sales decline was primarily due to lower repairreimbursement revenue from our third-party underwriter on extended protection plan claims. This trend, which primarily related to mobile phones, was a reflection of changes to the design of our extended protection plans in fiscal 2016, improvements to our repair and fulfillment operations and industry trends.

Our Domestic segment experienced an increase in gross profit of $404 million, or 5.0%,rate to 23.9% in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. Excluding the $88 million of CRT/LCD litigation settlement proceeds received2017 from 23.3% in fiscal 2016, we experienced an increase in gross profit of $316 million, or 3.9%. Refer to Note 12, Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.2016. This rate increase was primarily due to (1) the periodic profit-share revenue described above; (2) rate improvements in computing hardware, driven by our more disciplined promotional strategy; (3)and (2) an additional positive mix shift due to significantly decreased revenueincrease in the lower-margin tablet category; (4) the positive impact of lower repair revenue

34


(as discussed above), which typically earns a low gross profit rate; (5) an increased mix of higher-margin large screen televisions; and (6) positive revenue impact related to our credit card portfolio. These increases wereCRT legal settlements, partially offset by (1) lower rates relatedmargins from mobile phones due to large appliances;changes in device mix, and (2) a lower rate in the mobile category driven by increased sales of higher priced iconic mobile phones, which have higher gross profit dollars but carry a lower gross profit rate; (3) decrease in margin for portable audio products; (4) a decreased mix of higher-margin digital imaging products; (5) an increased mix of lower-margin wearable devices; and (6) an investment in services pricing.our periodic profit-share revenue as described above.

Our Domestic segment's SG&A increased $258 million, or 3.9%, in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015. In addition, thesegment SG&A rate increasedslightly decreased to 19.0%18.9% of revenue in fiscal 2017 compared to 18.4%19.0% of revenue in the prior year. The increasesdecrease in SG&Arate was primarily driven by cost reductions and SG&A rate were primarily drivenlower incentive compensation, partially offset by investments in growth initiatives, a greater portion of our vendor funding being recorded as an offset to cost of goods sold rather than SG&A and higher incentive compensation. This increase was partially offset by the implementation of Renew Blue Phase 2 cost reductions.initiatives.
 
Our Domestic segment recorded $31 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2017 and incurred $2 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 and incurred $4 million of2016. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2015. The restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate2017 related to the Renew Blue Phase 2 plan that began in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015.2017. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.
 
Our Domestic segment’s operating income increased $148$179 million in fiscal 20162017 compared to fiscal 2015.2016. In addition, the operating income rate increased to 4.4%4.9% of revenue in fiscal 20162017 compared to 4.0%4.4% of revenue in the prior year. The increase was driven by higherthe revenue, and margin and $75 million in net CRT/LCD litigation settlement proceeds received in fiscal 2016, partially offset by the increase in SG&A as described above.
Fiscal 2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2014
Domestic segment revenue increased from $35.8 billion in fiscal 2014 to $36.1 billion in fiscal 2015, primarily driven by comparable sales growth of 1.0%. Excluding the 0.5% of revenue estimated benefit associated with the classification of the new mobile carrier installment billing plans, comparable sales increased 0.5%. Online revenue was $3.5 billion, and we experienced comparable online sales growth of 16.7% due to: (1) improved inventory availability made possible by the chain-wide rollout of our ship-from-store capability that was completed in January 2014; (2) higher average order value; and (3) increased traffic driven by greater investment in online digital marketing.

The components of the 0.6% revenue increase in the Domestic segment in fiscal 2015 were as follows:
Comparable sales impact0.9 %
Non-comparable sales(1)
(0.2)%
Net store changes(0.1)%
Total revenue increase0.6 %
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as credit card revenue, gift card breakage, commercial sales and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers.

The net store changes did not have a material impact on our revenue in fiscal 2015, as the majority of closures occurred in the fourth quarter and related to our small-format Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores. The closing of small-format Best Buy Mobile stores have a significantly smaller impact given their smaller size and limited category focus compared to our large-format stores.

35


The following table presents the Domestic segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2015 and 2014:
 Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
 Year Ended Year Ended
 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Consumer Electronics31% 30% 3.7 % (5.6)%
Computing and Mobile Phones47% 48% (0.6)% 4.7 %
Entertainment9% 8% 4.5 % (16.3)%
Appliances7% 7% 7.5 % 16.7 %
Services5% 6% (11.1)% 0.2 %
Other1% 1% n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% 1.0 % (0.4)%

The following is a description of the notable comparable sales changes in our Domestic segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 3.7% comparable sales increase was primarily due to growth in televisions, with strong sales increases in Ultra-HD television. This was partially offset by declines in DVD/Blu-ray players, as online streaming continues to increase, and cameras, as device convergence with smartphones and tablets continued.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 0.6% comparable sales decline primarily resulted from a significant decrease in tablets due to industry declines. This decline was partially offset by an increase in sales of computers, as well as an increase in sales of mobile phones driven by the introduction of mobile carrier installment billing plans and higher year over year selling prices. Excluding the impact of installment billing, mobile phone comparable sales declined.
Entertainment: The 4.5% comparable sales increase was driven primarily by gaming sales from new platforms launched in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, partially offset by the continuing declines in movies and music as consumers continue to shift from physical media to online streaming and downloads.
Appliances: The 7.5% comparable sales gain was a result of strong performance throughout fiscal 2015 due to effective promotions, the addition of appliance specialists in select stores and the positive impact of Pacific Kitchen & Home store-within-a-store concepts.
Services: The 11.1% comparable sales decline was primarily due to lower mobile repair revenue and lower sales of extended warranty plans driven by lower attach rates.
Our Domestic segment experienced a decrease in gross profit of $194 million, or 2.3%, in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. The most significant driver of the decrease was $314 million of LCD legal settlement proceeds that we received in fiscal 2014. Excluding these LCD settlements, we experienced an increase in gross profit of $120 million, and the gross profit rate increased 0.2% of revenue. The primary drivers of the gross profit rate increase were: (1) the benefit from the realization of our Renew Blue cost reductions and other supply chain cost containment initiatives (including initiatives related to returns, replacements and damages); (2) a more structured and analytical approach to pricing, notably the fourth quarter; and (3) increased revenue in higher-margin large-screen televisions. These increases were offset by a mix shift into lower-margin gaming and computing categories and a highly competitive promotional environment in tablets.

Our Domestic segment's SG&A decreased $367 million, or 5.2%, in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. In addition, the SG&A rate decreased by 1.2% of revenue compared to the prior year. The decreases in SG&A and SG&A rate were primarily driven by the realization of Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and the benefit from tighter expense management throughout the company. These declines were partially offset by Renew Blue investments in online growth and our in-store experience, as well as higher incentive compensation.
Our Domestic segment recorded $4 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2015 and incurred $123 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2014. These restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate in fiscal 2015 and resulted in a decrease in our operating income rate in fiscal 2014 of 0.3% of revenue. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.
Our Domestic segment’s operating income increased $292 million, or 0.8% of revenue, in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. The increase was driven by lower SG&A, a comparable sales gain and lower restructuring charges, partially offset by the decrease in gross profit from the prior-year LCD settlementsimprovements described above.

36


International Segment

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we consolidated the Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores and the conversion of the remaining 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand. The costs of implementing these changes primarily consisted of lease exit costs, a tradename impairment, property and equipment impairments, employee termination benefits and inventory write-downs. In fiscal 2016, we incurred total pre-tax restructuring charges, other Canadian brand consolidation charges (charges that did not qualify as restructuring charges) and property and equipment impairment of $209 million of out of the previously disclosed expected range of approximately $210 million to $250 million related to those actions. As we continue to solidify our strategy for our Canada transformation, we may incur additional charges of up to $35 million in future periods primarily related to non-restructuring asset impairments.

The following table presents selected financial data for our International segment for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
International Segment Performance Summary 2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Revenue $3,163
 $4,284
 $4,780
$3,489
 $3,155
 $3,163
Revenue decline % (26.2)% (10.4)% (5.0)%
Comparable sales % decline(1)
 n/a
 (3.5)% (5.1)%
Revenue gain (decline) %10.6% (0.3)% (26.2)%
Comparable sales % gain(1)
6.3% n/a
 n/a
Restructuring charges - cost of goods sold $3
 $
 $
$
 $
 $3
Gross profit $707
 $967
 $1,125
$811
 $790
 $707
Gross profit as % of revenue 22.4 % 22.6 % 23.5 %23.2% 25.0 % 22.4 %
SG&A $721
 $953
 $1,100
$719
 $692
 $721
SG&A as % of revenue 22.8 % 22.2 % 23.0 %20.6% 21.9 % 22.8 %
Restructuring charges $196
 $1
 $26
$1
 $8
 $196
Operating income (loss) $(210) $13
 $(1)$91
 $90
 $(210)
Operating income (loss) as % of revenue (6.6)% 0.3 %  %2.6% 2.9 % (6.6)%

34




(1)The Canadian brand consolidation hashad a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, all store and website revenue has beenwas removed from the comparable sales base, and an International segment (comprised of Canada and Mexico) comparable sales metric for the full year has not been provided. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we resumed reporting International comparable sales as revenue in the International segment was once again determined to be comparable. International comparable sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 was 0.9%. Comparable sales also exclude the impact of the extra week in fiscal 2018.

The following table reconciles our International segment stores open at the end of each of the last three fiscal years:
Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Stores Converted Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
 Stores
Opened
 Stores
Closed
 Total Stores
at End of
Fiscal Year
Canada                            
Future Shop137
 1
 (5) 133
 
 (68) (65) 
Best Buy72
 
 (1) 71
 3
 (3) 65
 136
136
 
 (2) 134
 
 
 134
Best Buy Mobile56
 
 
 56
 
 
 
 56
56
 1
 (4) 53
 
 (2) 51
Mexico                            
Best Buy17
 1
 
 18
 
 
 
 18
18
 2
 
 20
 5
 
 25
Express2
 3
 
 5
 1
 
 
 6
6
 
 (1) 5
 1
 
 6
Total International segment stores284
 5
 (6) 283
 4
 (71) 
 216
216
 3
 (7) 212
 6
 (2) 216

Fiscal 20162018 Results Compared With Fiscal 20152017

In our International segment revenue declined 26.2% to $3.2of $3.5 billion in fiscal 20162018 increased 10.6% compared to the prior year and includes approximately $45 million of revenue from the extra week. The components of the 10.6% revenue increase in the International segment in fiscal 2018 were as follows:
Comparable sales impact6.1%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations2.7%
Non-comparable sales(1)
1.8%
Total revenue increase10.6%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity, including the Canadian brand consolidation activity in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017, the impact of the extra week in fiscal 2018, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2018 and 2017:
 Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
 Year Ended Year Ended
 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Consumer Electronics32% 31% 7.1 % n/a
Computing and Mobile Phones46% 48% 2.0 % n/a
Entertainment7% 7% 9.3 % n/a
Appliances8% 6% 41.3 % n/a
Services5% 7% (5.1)% n/a
Other2% 1% 15.4 % n/a
Total100% 100% 6.3 % n/a

As noted above, comparable sales information has not been provided for the International segment for fiscal 2017 due to (1) the loss of revenue associated with closed stores as part of the Canadian brand consolidation; (2)consolidation. As such, it is also impractical to provide such information on a negative foreign currency impact of 12.5%; and (3) ongoing softnessrevenue category basis. Beginning in the Canadian economy and consumer electronics industry.fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we resumed reporting International comparable sales as revenue in the International segment was once again determined to be comparable.


3735




The following is a description of the notable comparable sales changes in our International segment by revenue category in fiscal 2018:

Consumer Electronics: The 7.1% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by smart home, home theater, headphones and voice assistants, partially offset by declines in digital imaging and health and fitness.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 2.0% comparable sales gain was driven by primarily by computing, mobile phones and wearables, partially offset by declines in tablets.
Entertainment: The 9.3% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by gaming hardware.
Appliances: The 41.3% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by large and small appliances due to the addition of an appliance department within all of our stores in Canada.
Services: The 5.1% comparable sales decline was driven primarily by technical support and repair, partially offset by gains in installation.
Other: The 15.4% comparable sales gain was driven primarily by other product offerings, including baby and sporting goods.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit increase of $21 million, or 2.7%, in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017, primarily related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the increase in gross profit was $3 million. However, the gross profit rate decreased to 23.2% in fiscal 2018 from 25.0% of revenue in fiscal 2017. This decrease in rate was primarily due to lower year-over-year periodic profit-share revenue and lower sales in the higher-margin services category in Canada. This was primarily driven by the launch of our Total Tech Support offer, an ongoing service revenue model that carries a higher sales-attach rate, but a lower gross profit rate.

Our International segment's SG&A increased $27 million, or 3.9%, in fiscal 2018 compared to the prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the increase in SG&A was $12 million. However, the SG&A rate decreased to 20.6% in fiscal 2018 from 21.9% of revenue in fiscal 2017. The increase in SG&A was primarily driven by the impact of the extra week and a one-time employee bonus expense related to tax reform, partially offset by lower payroll and benefits and administrative costs.

Our International segment recorded $1 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2018 and $8 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2017. Restructuring charges in both years relate to adjustments to our vacant space liabilities outstanding as a result of the Canadian brand consolidation and the Renew Blue plans. The adjustments were due to changes in estimates related to sublease income. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

Our International segment operating income was $91 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $90 million in the prior-year period. The slight improvement in operating income was primarily driven by increased gross profit and lower restructuring costs, offset by increased SG&A.

Fiscal 2017 Results Compared With Fiscal 2016
International segment revenue of $3.2 billion in fiscal 2017 decreased 0.3% compared to the prior year. The components of the International segment's 26.2%0.3% revenue decrease in the International segment in fiscal 20162017 were as follows:
Non-comparable sales(1)
(13.71.8) %
Comparable sales impact0.3%
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(12.52.4)%
Total revenue decrease(26.20.3)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of net store opening and closing activity, including the Canadian brand consolidation activity, as well as the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.


36

Table of Contents



The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages by revenue category in fiscal 20162017 and 2015:2016:
Revenue Mix SummaryRevenue Mix Summary
Year EndedYear Ended
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Consumer Electronics31% 30%31% 31%
Computing and Mobile Phones48% 49%48% 48%
Entertainment9% 9%7% 9%
Appliances5% 5%6% 5%
Services6% 6%7% 6%
Other1% 1%1% 1%
Total100% 100%100% 100%

As noted above, comparable sales information has not been provided for the International segment for fiscal 2017 or 2016 due to the Canadian brand consolidation. As such, it is also impractical to provide such information on a revenue category basis. However, as noted above, the revenue mix by category hasdid not changedchange significantly from fiscal 2015.2016.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit declineincrease of $260$83 million, or 26.9%11.7%, in fiscal 20162017 compared to fiscal 2015.2016. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decreaseincrease in gross profit was $141$98 million. The gross profit rate declinedincreased to 25.0% in fiscal 2017 from 22.4% of revenue in fiscal 2016 from 22.6% of revenue in fiscal 2015.2016. This declineincrease was primarily due to the disruptive impacts from the Canadian brand consolidation and increased promotional activity in Canada.fiscal 2016 as a result of the Canada brand consolidation which did not reoccur and to a lesser extent rate growth in computing and home theater.

Our International segment's SG&A decreased $232$29 million, or 24.3%4.0%, in fiscal 20162017 compared to the prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in SG&A was $115$9 million. However, theThe SG&A expense rate increaseddecreased to 21.9% in fiscal 2017 from 22.8% of revenue in fiscal 2016 from 22.2% of revenue in fiscal 2015.2016. The decrease in SG&A expense was driven by the elimination of expenses associated with closed stores as part of the Canadian brand consolidation. The increase in the SG&A rate was driven by year-over-year sales deleverage.leverage.

Our International segment recorded $8 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2017 and incurred $199 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2016 and incurred $1 million of2016. The fiscal 2017 restructuring charges related to adjustments to our vacant space liabilities outstanding as a result of the Canadian brand consolidation and the Renew Blue plans. The adjustments were due to changes in fiscal 2015.estimates related to sublease income. The fiscal 2016 restructuring charges primarily related to the Canadian brand consolidation and consisted of facility closure costs, a tradename impairments,impairment, property and equipment impairments and employee termination benefits. The restructuring charges in fiscal 2015 had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

Our International segment operating loss of $210 million in fiscal 2016 compared to income of $13 million in the prior-year period. The decline in operating income was driven primarily by a decrease in revenue and gross profit rate and restructuring charges, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses as described above.

Fiscal 2015 Results Compared With Fiscal 2014

Our international segment experienced a decrease in revenue of 10.4% primarily driven by the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, a comparable sales decline of 3.5%, and the loss of revenue from store closures in Canada.

38

Table of Contents

The components of the International segment's 10.4% revenue decrease in fiscal 2015 were as follows:
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations(6.4)%
Comparable sales impact(3.4)%
Net store changes(0.9)%
Non-comparable sales(1)
0.3 %
Total revenue decrease(10.4)%
(1)Non-comparable sales reflects the impact of revenue streams not included within our comparable sales calculation, such as certain credit card revenue, gift card breakage and sales of merchandise to wholesalers and dealers, as applicable.

The net closure of large-format stores in Canada contributed to the decrease in revenue associated with net store changes in our International segment in fiscal 2015. The addition of large and small-format stores in Mexico partially offset this decrease.

The following table presents the International segment's revenue mix percentages and comparable sales percentage changes by revenue category in fiscal 2015 and 2014:
 Revenue Mix Summary Comparable Sales Summary
 Year Ended Year Ended
 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Consumer Electronics30% 29% (5.1)% (9.7)%
Computing and Mobile Phones49% 50% (2.8)% (1.7)%
Entertainment9% 10% (5.2)% (9.3)%
Appliances5% 5% (0.5)% (1.5)%
Services6% 6% (4.7)% (6.3)%
Other1% <1%
 n/a
 n/a
Total100% 100% (3.5)% (5.1)%

The following is a description of the notable comparable sales changes in our International segment by revenue category:

Consumer Electronics: The 5.1% comparable sales decline was driven primarily by a decrease in sales of digital imaging products, televisions and MP3 devices. The declines in digital imaging products and MP3 devices were a result of device convergence and industry declines. The decrease in sales of televisions was due to overall market softness across the segment and competitive pressures in Canada.
Computing and Mobile Phones: The 2.8% comparable sales decline was caused primarily by a decrease in sales of tablets due to industry declines, partially offset by increased mobile phone sales.
Entertainment: The 5.2% comparable sales decline was driven by a decrease in sales of movies and music as customers continue to shift from physical media to digital consumption, partially offset by gaming sales in Canada due to the release of new gaming platforms in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
Appliances: The 0.5% comparable sales decline was driven by Mexico due to a decrease in sales of kitchen appliances, partially offset by appliance sales increases in Canada from expansion of offerings and assortment.
Services: The 4.7% comparable sales decline was due to a decrease in sales of warranties in Canada driven by the overall comparable sales decline in applicable hardware, particularly tablets and televisions.

Our International segment experienced a gross profit decline of $158 million, or 14.0%, in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in gross profit was $88 million. The gross profit rate decline of 0.9% of revenue was driven by Canada due to increased promotional activity and, to a lesser extent, higher revenue in the lower-margin gaming category.

Our International segment's SG&A decreased $147 million, or 13.4%, in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the decrease in SG&A was $81 million. In addition, the SG&A rate decreased by 0.8% of revenue in fiscal 2015. The decrease in SG&A and SG&A rate was primarily driven by Renew Blue cost reductions and store closures in Canada.

Our International segment recorded $1 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2015 and $26 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2014. The restructuring charges had an immaterial impact on our operating income rate in fiscal 2015 and resulted in a

39

Table of Contents

decrease in our operating income rate in fiscal 2014 of 0.5% of revenue. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our restructuring activities.

Our International segment operating income of $13was $90 million in fiscal 20152017 compared to a loss of $1$210 million in the prior-year period. The improvement in operating income was primarily driven primarily by a decrease inlower restructuring costs and gross profit and SG&A partially offset by a decrease in gross profit as described above.rate improvements.

Additional Consolidated Results

Other Income (Expense)

In fiscal 2016,2018, our gain on sale of investments was $2$1 million compared to $13$3 million and $20$2 million in fiscal 20152017 and fiscal 2014,2016, respectively. These gains were due to the sale of cost-based investments.

In fiscal 2016,2018, our investment income and other was $13$48 million, compared to $14$31 million and $13 million in the prior year. The decrease infiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, wasrespectively. The increases were primarily due to lowerhigher interest rates in Canada and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translations. In fiscal 2015, our investment income and other was $14 million, compared to $19 million in fiscal 2014. The decrease in fiscal 2015 was due to lower returns on our deferred compensation assets, partially offset byU.S. as well as an increase in interest income driven by higher average cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances.investments throughout the year in fiscal 2018.

Interest expense was $75 million, $72 million and $80 million in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, compared to $90 millionrespectively. Interest expense remained relatively flat in fiscal 2015. The decrease2018 but decreased in interest expense wasfiscal 2017 primarily due to swapping a portionlower debt balance for a majority of the year caused by the March 2016 payment of our fixed rate debt to floating rate, which was lower than our fixed rate.$350 million principal amount notes. Refer to Note 6, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. Interest expense was $90 million in fiscal 2015, compared to $100 million in fiscal 2014. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to obtaining a lower interest rate

37

Table of 5.00% on our 2018 Notes compared to our previously held notes that bore interest at 6.75%.Contents



Income Tax Expense

Income On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("tax expense increasedreform" or “Tax Act”), which among other things, lowered the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to $503 million in fiscal 2016, compared to21% effective January 1, 2018. Consequently, we applied a tax expense of $141 million in the prior year, primarily due to a $353 million discrete benefit related to reorganizing certain European legal entities in the prior year period, as well as a lower mix of pre-tax earnings from foreign operations in fiscal 2016, partially offset by a decrease in pre-tax earnings in fiscal 2016. Our effectiveblended U.S. statutory federal income tax rate ("ETR")of 33.7 % for fiscal 2016 was 38.4%, compared2018. In addition, the Tax Act imposed a one-time deemed repatriation tax on net unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries not previously subject to U.S. income tax, which is payable over a rateperiod of 10.1% in fiscal 2015. Excludingeight years. In response to the Tax Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued a Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) that provides guidance on accounting for the impact of reorganizing certain European legal entities, the ETR would have been 35.6%Tax Act. SAB 118 allows companies to record provisional amounts while the accounting impact of the Tax Act is still under analysis, not to extend beyond the measurement period of one year from the enactment of the Tax Act.

As a result of the Tax Act, we recorded provisional tax expense in fiscal 2015.2018 of $283 million. The $283 million included a $209 million charge associated with the deemed repatriation tax and a $74 million charge primarily related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the new tax rate. The actual impact of the Tax Act may differ materially from our provisional amounts due to further refinement of our calculations as allowed by SAB 118, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made, or actions we may take as a result of the Tax Act. The provisional amounts will be finalized within the one-year measurement period as we gather and analyze the additional documentation necessary for the calculations. Refer to Note 10, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Income tax expense decreasedincreased to $141$818 million in fiscal 2015,2018, compared to $609 million in fiscal 2017, primarily as a result of the $283 million of tax expense associated with the Tax Act, partially offset by the impacts from the recognition of excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, the lower blended U.S. statutory tax rate of 33.7% and a higher mix of pre-tax income from foreign operations in the current year. Our effective income tax rate (“ETR”) for fiscal 2018 was 45.0%, compared to a tax expenserate of $388 million33.5% in fiscal 2017. The increase in the fiscal 2014,ETR was primarily due to a $353 million discrete benefitthe impact of the Tax Act, partially offset by the recognition of excess tax benefits related to reorganizing certain European legal entities, partially offset bystock-based compensation and a higher mix of pre-tax income from foreign operations in the current year.

Income tax expense increased to $609 million in fiscal 2017, compared to $503 million in fiscal 2016, primarily as a result of an increase in pre-tax earnings, partially offset by a higher mix of pre-tax income from foreign operations and the resolution of certain tax matters in fiscal 2017. Our ETR for fiscal 2017 was 33.5%, compared to a rate of 38.4% in fiscal 2016. The decrease in the current-year period. Our ETR was 10.1%primarily due to a higher mix of pre-tax income from foreign operations and the resolution of certain tax matters in fiscal 2015, compared to 35.8% in fiscal 2014.2017.

Our consolidated ETR is impacted by the statutory income tax rates applicable to each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. As our foreign earnings are generally taxed at a lower statutory ratesrate than the 35%current 33.7% U.S. federal statutory rate, changes in the proportion of our consolidated taxable earnings originating in foreign jurisdictions impact our consolidated effective rate. Our foreign earnings have been indefinitely reinvested outsideWith the lower U.S. and are not subjectstatutory tax rate enacted by the Tax Act, we expect our fiscal 2019 effective tax rate to current U.S. income tax.be lower.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations consistsreflect activity within our International segment. Gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2018 was $1 million, primarily related to the proceeds attributed to a non-compete clause from the sale of Best Buy Europe and Five Star in our International segment, as well as mindSHIFT in our Domestic segment.

The earningsto Carphone Warehouse plc. Gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2017 of $21 million was primarily related to the sale of the remaining Five Star property assets that were held for sale as of January 30, 2016. The $90 million gain from discontinued operations in fiscal 2016 compared to a loss of $11 million and $172 million in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively. Earnings in fiscal 2016 were duewas primarily related to the gain recognized on the sale of Five Star. The loss from discontinued operations of $11 million in fiscal 2015 was driven by charges related to Five Star. The loss from discontinued operation of $172 million in fiscal 2014 was primarily due to the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe, as well as the loss on the sale of mindSHIFT.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures


4038



The periods used for analysis of non-GAAP financial performance represent the periods that management used internally to assess performance.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following table reconciles operating income, income tax expense, effective income tax rate, net earnings from continuing operations and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented from continuing operations (GAAP financial measures) for the periods presented to non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP income tax expense, non-GAAP effective income tax rate, non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (non-GAAP financial measures) for the periods presented ($ in millions, except per share amounts):
 Fiscal Year
 2016 2015 2014
Operating income$1,375
 $1,450
 $1,144
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(77) 
 (229)
  Restructuring charges - COGS3
 
 
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
6
 
 
  Non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A61
 42
 99
  Restructuring charges198
 5
 149
Non-GAAP operating income$1,566
 $1,497
 $1,163
      
Income tax expense$503
 $141
 $388
  Effective tax rate
38.4% 10.1% 35.8%
  Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(5)

 
 (18)
  Income tax impact of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 353
 
  Income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
30
 11
 (8)
Non-GAAP Income tax expense$533
 $505
 $362
  Non-GAAP Effective tax rate
35.4% 35.5% 33.5%
      
Net earnings from continuing operations$807
 $1,246
 $695
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(77) 
 (229)
  Restructuring charges - COGS3
 
 
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
6
 
 
  Non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A61
 42
 99
  Restructuring charges198
 5
 149
  (Gain) loss on sale of investments5
 (11) (19)
  Income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale (5)

 
 18
  Income tax impact of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 (353) 
  Income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
(30) (11) 8
Adjusted net earnings from continuing operations$973
 $918
 $721
      
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
  Per share impact of net CRT/LCD settlements(1)
(0.22) 
 (0.66)
  Per share impact of restructuring charges - COGS0.01
 
 
  Per share impact of other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(2)
0.02
 
 
  Per share impact of non-restructuring asset impairments - SG&A0.17
 0.12
 0.29
  Per share impact of restructuring charges0.58
 0.01
 0.43
  Per share impact of (gain) loss on sale of investments0.01
 (0.03) (0.06)
  Per share income tax impact of Best Buy Europe sale(5)

 
 0.05
  Per share income tax effect of Europe legal entity reorganization(3)

 (1.00) 
  Per share income tax impact of Non-GAAP adjustments(4)
(0.09) (0.03) 0.02
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$2.78
 $2.60
 $2.07
 Fiscal Year
 2018 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
Operating income$1,843
 $1,854
 $1,375
  Tax reform-related item - employee bonus(2)
80
 
 
  Tax reform-related item - charitable contribution(2)
20
 
 
  Restructuring charges(3)
10
 39
 198
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(4)

 (161) (77)
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(5)

 1
 6
  Restructuring charges - COGS(3)

 
 3
Non-GAAP operating income$1,953
 $1,733
 $1,505
      
Income tax expense$818
 $609
 $503
  Effective tax rate
45.0% 33.5% 38.4%
  Tax reform - repatriation tax(2)
(209) 
 
  Tax reform - deferred tax rate change(2)
(74) 
 
  Income tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments(6)
41
 (48) 7
Non-GAAP income tax expense$576
 $561
 $510
  Non-GAAP effective tax rate
29.8% 33.1% 35.3%
      
Net earnings from continuing operations$999
 $1,207
 $807
  Tax reform-related item - employee bonus(2)
80
 
 
  Tax reform-related item - charitable contribution(2)
20
 
 
  Restructuring charges(3)
10
 39
 198
  (Gain) loss on sale of investments, net(7)
6
 (2) 5
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(4)

 (161) (77)
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(5)

 1
 6
  Restructuring charges - COGS(3)

 
 3
  Tax reform - repatriation tax(2)
209
 
 
  Tax reform - deferred tax rate change(2)
74
 
 
  Income tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments(6)
(41) 48
 (7)
Non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations$1,357
 $1,132
 $935
      
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$3.26
 $3.74
 $2.30
  Tax reform-related item - employee bonus(2)
0.26
 
 
  Tax reform-related item - charitable contribution(2)
0.07
 
 
  Restructuring charges(3)
0.03
 0.12
 0.58
  (Gain) loss on sale of investments, net(7)
0.02
 (0.01) 0.01
  Net CRT/LCD settlements(4)

 (0.50) (0.22)
  Other Canada brand consolidation charges - SG&A(5)

 0.01
 0.02
  Restructuring charges - COGS(3)

 
 0.01
  Tax reform - repatriation tax(2)
0.68
 
 
  Tax reform - deferred tax rate change(2)
0.24
 
 
  Income tax impact of non-GAAP adjustments(6)
(0.14) 0.15
 (0.03)
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$4.42
 $3.51
 $2.67
(1)
Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, we no longer exclude non-restructuring property and equipment impairment charges from our non-GAAP financial measures. To ensure our financial results are comparable, we have recast the prior period balances to conform to this presentation. Refer to the Overview section within this MD&A for more information.

39




(2)Represents CRT/charges resulting from the Tax Act enacted into law in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, including charges associated with a deemed repatriation tax and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as tax reform-related items we announced in response to future tax savings created by tax reform, including a one-time bonus for certain employees and a one-time contribution to the Best Buy Foundation.
(3)
Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the nature of these charges. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018, $9 million related to the U.S. and $1 million related to Canada. For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, $31 million related to the U.S. and $8 million related to Canada. For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, $2 million related to the U.S. and $199 million related to Canada.
(4)
Represents CRT and LCD litigation settlements reached, in each reported period, net of related legal fees and costs. Settlements related to products purchased and sold in prior fiscal years. For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017, the full balance related to the U.S. For the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, $75 million related to the U.S. and $2 million related to Canada. Refer to Note 12, Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

41


(2)(5)Represents charges related to the Canadian brand consolidation initiated in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, primarily due to retention bonuses and other store-related costs that were a direct result of the consolidation but did not qualify as restructuring charges.
(3)Represents the acceleration of a non-cash tax benefit of $353 million as a result of reorganizing certain European legal entities to simplify our overall structure in the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
(4)(6)Income tax impact of Non-GAAPnon-GAAP adjustments is the summation of the calculated income tax charge related to each non-GAAP non-income tax adjustment. IncomeThe non-GAAP adjustments relate primarily to adjustments in the U.S. and Canada. As such, the income tax charge is calculated using the statutory tax rates in effect duringfor the periodU.S. (36.7% for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018, and 38.0% for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2017) and Canada (26.6% for the fiscal years ended February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017, respectively), applied to the non-GAAP adjustments of the related non-GAAP adjustment.each country.
(5)(7)Represents the tax impact(gain) loss on sale of the Best Buy Europe saleinvestments and resulting required tax allocation between continuinginvestment impairments included in Investment income and discontinued operations.other on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Non-GAAP operating income for fiscal 20162018 increased $69$220 million compared to fiscal 2015.2017, and non-GAAP operating income as a percent of revenue increased to 4.6%. The increase was driven primarily by strong revenue performance in both our Domestic and International segments in nearly all product categories and the impact of the extra week, offset by increases in SG&A primarily due to higher incentive compensation for store and corporate employees. The increase in non-GAAP operating income resulted in a year-over-year increase in non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017.

Non-GAAP operating income for fiscal 2017 increased $228 million compared to fiscal 2016, and non-GAAP operating income as a percent of revenue increased to 4.4%. The increase was driven by the increased revenue in the Domestic segment, increased Enterpriseconsolidated gross profit rate and continued SG&A cost reductions in both segments primarily due to the realization of our Renew Blue Phase 2 cost reduction initiatives and tighter expense management. The increase in non-GAAP operating income resulted in a year-over-year increase in non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in fiscal 20162017 compared to fiscal 2015.2016.

Non-GAAP operating income for fiscal 2015 increased $334 million compared to fiscal 2014, and non-GAAP operating income as a percent of revenue increased to 3.7%. The increase in non-GAAP operating income was driven by SG&A cost reductions in both segments primarily due to the realization of our Renew Blue cost reduction initiatives and tighter expense management, partially offset by a decline in revenue in our International segment. The increase in non-GAAP operating income resulted in a year-over-year increase in non-GAAP net earnings from continuing operations and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share from continuing operations in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary

We closely manage our liquidity and capital resources. Our liquidity requirements depend on key variables, including the level of investment required to support our business strategies, the performance of our business, capital expenditures, credit facilities and short-term borrowing arrangements and working capital management. Capital expenditures and share repurchases are a component of our cash flow and capital management strategy which, to a large extent, we can adjust in response to economic and other changes in our business environment. We have a disciplined approach to capital allocation, which focuses on investing in key priorities that support our RenewBest Buy 2020: Building the New Blue transformation.strategy.

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017 ($ in millions):
January 30, 2016
 January 31, 2015
February 3, 2018
 January 28, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$1,976
 $2,432
$1,101
 $2,240
Short-term investments1,305
 1,456
2,032
 1,681
Total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments$3,281
 $3,888
$3,133
 $3,921

The decrease inExisting cash and cash equivalents from January 31, 2015, was primarily due to a resumption of share repurchases, a special dividend and an increase in the regular quarterly dividend. This was partially offset byshort-term investments as well as cash generated from operating activities.operations were sufficient to fund share repurchases, capital expenditures and dividends in fiscal 2018 without the need to utilize our credit facilities or other debt arrangements.


40




Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
Total cash provided by (used in):          
Operating activities$1,322
 $1,935
 $1,094
$2,141
 $2,557
 $1,343
Investing activities(419) (1,712) (517)(1,002) (877) (526)
Financing activities(1,515) (223) 319
(2,297) (1,418) (1,536)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(38) (52) (44)25
 10
 (38)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(650) $(52) $852
$(1,133) $272
 $(757)

42


(1)
Fiscal 2017 and 2016 have been recast to reflect our retrospective adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classifications of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities.

Operating Activities

The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 20162018 compared to fiscal 20152017 was primarily due to the timing of inventory receiptspurchasing and payments and advertising payments. During fiscal 2018, we purchased greater amounts of inventory with shorter payment terms than in the prior year, causing more payments to be made prior to fiscal year-end. This was partially offset by the timing of receivable collections and income tax payments. During fiscal 2016, we decided to bring Holiday inventory in early and the Super Bowl shifted to the first quarter of fiscal 2017, which caused us to hold our inventory longer and settle our accounts payable related to that inventory prior to year-end. In addition, we paid more income taxes in fiscal 2016 primarily due to the timing of when payments were made.

The increase in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 20152017 compared to fiscal 20142016 was primarily due to improved management of working capital in fiscal 2015. Additionally, in fiscal 2014 there were larger cash outflows from accounts payable, following unusually high balances at the end of fiscal 2013 due to timing of inventory receipts.purchasing and payments and increased earnings. During fiscal 2017, we purchased and paid for inventory later in the Holiday season than in the prior year, positively impacting operating cash flows. This was partially offset by the timing of collection of receivables.

Investing Activities

The decrease in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily due to increased sales of short-term investments partially offset by capital expenditures (see Capital Expenditures below).

The increase in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 20152018 compared to fiscal 20142017 was primarily due to increased purchases ofan increase in capital spending to support our strategic growth initiatives and cash received in fiscal 2017 for the Five Star asset held-for-sale. This was partially offset by a decrease in the net investment in short-term investments during fiscal 2018.

The increase in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 was primarily due to an increase in the net investment in short-term investments in fiscal 2015.2017.

Financing Activities

The increase in cash used byin financing activities in fiscal 20162018 compared to fiscal 20152017 was primarily due to increased share repurchases, driven by an increase in our share price and the number of shares repurchased, and an increase in our regular quarterly dividend payments. Inrate from $0.28 per share in fiscal 2016, we purchased $1.0 billion of common stock as part2017 to $0.34 per share in fiscal 2018. These increases were partially offset by the repayment of our June 2011 share repurchase program. In addition, we increased our normal dividend from 2015 to 2016 notes due March 15, 2016 (the "2016 Notes"), in fiscal 2017 and paid a special dividend payment in 2016.fiscal 2017.

The decrease in cash provided byused in financing activities in fiscal 20152017 compared to fiscal 20142016 was primarily due to decreased borrowing and decreased proceeds froma decline in the issuancenumber of common stock, primarily fromshares repurchased, which was substantially offset by the exerciserepayment of employee stock options.our $350 million principal amount of our 2016 Notes.

Sources of Liquidity

Funds generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, our credit facilities and other debt arrangements and trade payables are our most significant sources of liquidity. We believe our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to sustainfund operations and to finance anticipated capital investmentsexpenditures, strategic initiatives, share repurchases and strategic initiatives.dividends. However, in the event our liquidity is insufficient, we may be required to limit our spending. There can be no assurance that we will continue to

41




generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our existing credit facilities or obtain additional financing, if necessary, on favorable terms.

On June 30, 2014, we entered intoWe have a new $1.25 billion five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Five-Year Facility Agreement") with a syndicate of banks that expires in June 2019. The Five-Year Facility Agreement replaced the previous $1.5 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, which was originally scheduled to expire in October 2016, but was terminated on June 30, 2014.2021. At January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, and January 30, 2016,28, 2017, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Five-Year Facility Agreement. Refer to Note 5, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities.facility.

Our ability to access our revolving credit facility under the Five-Year Facility Agreement is subject to our compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility, including financial covenants. The financial covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios. At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with all such financial covenants. If an event of default were to occur with respect to any of our other debt, it would likely constitute an event of default under our facilities as well.

An interest coverage ratio represents the ratio of pre-tax earnings before fixed charges (interest expense and the interest portion of rent expense) to fixed charges. Our interest coverage ratio, calculated as reported in Exhibit No. 12.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, was 5.166.86 and 5.086.97 in fiscal 20162018 and fiscal 2015,2017, respectively.

Our credit ratings and outlooks at March 21, 2016,29, 2018, are summarized below. On August 15, 2015,In fiscal 2018, Fitch Ratings Limited affirmed its long-term credit rating of BBB- and changed its outlook from Stable to Positive. In fiscal 2019, Standard & Poor's Rating Services ("Standard & Poor's") upgraded its long-term credit rating of BBB- to BBB and changed its outlook from BBPositive to BB+ with a Stable, outlook. On August 24, 2015,and Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") upgradedaffirmed its long-term credit rating from Baa2 toof Baa1 with a Stable

43


outlook. On August 26, 2015, Fitch Ratings Limited ("Fitch") upgraded its long-term credit rating from BB to BBB- with a Stable outlook.
Rating AgencyRating Outlook
Standard & Poor'sBB+BBB Stable
Moody'sBaa1 Stable
FitchBBB- StablePositive

Credit rating agencies review their ratings periodically and, therefore, the credit rating assigned to us by each agency may be subject to revision at any time. Accordingly, we are not able to predict whether our current credit ratings will remain as disclosed above. Factors that can affect our credit ratings include changes in our operating performance, the economic environment, conditions in the retail and consumer electronics industries, our financial position and changes in our business strategy. If further changes in our credit ratings were to occur, they could impact, among other things, interest costs for certain of our credit facilities, our future borrowing costs, access to capital markets, vendor financing terms and future new-store leasing costs.

Restricted Cash

Our liquidity is also affected by restricted cash balances that are pledged as collateral or restricted to use for general liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance. Restricted cash and cash equivalents related to our continuing operations, which are included in otherOther current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, remained relatively flat at $185$199 million and $184$193 million at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures typically include investments in our stores, distribution capabilities and information technology enhancements (including e-commerce). During fiscal 2016,2018, we invested $649$688 million in property and equipment, primarily related to upgrading our information technology systems and capabilities and store-related projects.

The following table presents our capital expenditures for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
New stores$5
 $3
 $8
$5
 $3
 $5
Store-related projects(1)
241
 177
 110
192
 190
 241
E-commerce and information technology390
 355
 350
425
 347
 356
Other13
 16
 9
Supply chain66
 40
 47
Total capital expenditures(3)(2)
$649
 $551
 $477
$688
 $580
 $649

42




(1)Includes store remodels and various merchandising projects.
(2)Excludes $10 million and $70 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to Five Star and Best Buy Europe.
(3)Total capital expenditures exclude non-cash capital expenditures of $92$123 million, $14$48 million and $13$92 million for fiscal 2016, fiscal 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Non-cash capital expenditures are comprised of capitalized leases, as well as additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable.

In fiscal 2017,2019, we estimate cash capital expenditures of approximately $650$850 million to $700$900 million, with the focus on supply chain, retail store, e-commerce and information technology projects.

Debt and Capital

We have $350 million principal amountAs of notes due March 15, 2016 (the “2016 Notes”),February 3, 2018, we had $500 million principal amount of notes due August 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”"2018 Notes") and $650 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2021 (the “2021 Notes”"2021 Notes"). outstanding. Refer to Note 5, Debt, ofin the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our 2016 Notes, 2018 Notes and 2021 Notes. In March 2016, we paid the balance of the 2016 Notes using existing cash resources.

Other


44


At January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, we had $178 million and $69 million, respectively, outstanding under financing lease obligations. The increase in financing lease obligations was primarily due to renewals on existing leases.

Share Repurchases and Dividends

We repurchase our common stock in the open marketand pay dividends pursuant to programs approved by our Board. We may repurchase our common stock for a varietyBoard of reasons, such as acquiring sharesDirectors ("Board"). Our long-term capital allocation strategy is to offset dilution relatedfirst fund operations and investments in growth and then return excess cash over time to equity-based incentives, including stock optionsshareholders through dividends and our employee stock purchase plan, and optimizing our capital structure. We consider several factors in determining whether to make share repurchases including, among other things, our cash needs, the availability of funding, our future business plans and the market price of our stock. If we decide to make future share repurchases, we expect that cash provided by future operating activities, as well as available cash and cash equivalents, will be the sources of funding for our share repurchases.while maintaining investment grade credit metrics.

We haveIn February 2017, our Board authorized a new $5.0 billion share repurchase program that was authorized by our Board insuperseded the previous $5.0 billion authorization from June 2011.2011, which had $2.2 billion remaining as of January 28, 2017. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 shareFebruary 2017 authorization. On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to repurchase program.

At$1.5 billion of shares in fiscal 2019, which reflects an updated two-year plan of $3.5 billion compared to the original $3.0 billion two-year plan announced on March 1, 2017. Between the end of fiscal 2015, $4.0 billion under this program was available for share repurchases. In fiscal 20162018 and March 29, 2018, we repurchased and retired 32.8an incremental 3.5 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $1.0 billion, which included the use of an accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") contract. Refer to Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the ASR. At the end of fiscal 2016, $3.0 billion of the $5.0 billion share repurchase program authorized by our Board in June 2011 was available for future share repurchases.$249 million. Repurchased shares have beenare retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares.

The following table presents our share repurchase history for each of the past three fiscal years (in millions, except per share amounts):
 2018 2017 
2016(1)
Total cost of shares repurchased$2,009
 $751
 $1,000
Average price per share$57.16
 $35.54
 $30.53
Number of shares repurchased35.1
 21.1 32.8
(1)
Share repurchases included the use of an accelerated share repurchase contract. Refer to Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

In fiscal 2004, our Board initiated the payment of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock. A quarterly cash dividend has been paid in each subsequent quarter. The payment of cash dividends is subject to customary legal and contractual restrictions. DuringThe following table presents our dividend activity for each of the past three fiscal years ($ in millions, except per share amounts):
 2018 2017 2016
Regular quarterly cash dividends per share$1.36
 $1.12
 $0.92
Special cash dividends per share(1)

 0.45
 0.51
Total cash dividends per share$1.36
 $1.57
 $1.43
Cash dividends declared and paid$409
 $505
 $499
(1)Special cash dividends are authorized by our Board and issued upon their discretion. Dividends paid in fiscal 2017 are related to the net after-tax proceeds from certain legal settlements and asset disposals, while the dividends paid in fiscal 2016 are related to the net after-tax proceeds from LCD-related legal settlements.

Dividends declared and paid in fiscal 2018 decreased from fiscal 2017 primarily due to the absence of a special cash dividend in the current year, partially offset by an increase in the regular quarterly dividend per share from $0.28 in fiscal 2017 to $0.34 in fiscal 2018. Dividends declared and paid in fiscal 2017 were relatively unchanged from fiscal 2016, we made four cashnoting that the quarterly dividend payments totaling $1.43 per share or $499 millionincreased from $0.23 in fiscal 2016 to $0.28 in fiscal 2017. The increase in the aggregate. During fiscal 2015, we made four cashregular dividend payments totaling $0.72 perrate was

43




substantially offset by fewer common shares, due to a return of capital to shareholders through share or $251 million in the aggregate.repurchases and a smaller special dividend.

On February 25, 2016,March 1, 2018, we announced a plan to return capital to shareholders. The plan includes a special dividend of $0.45 per share, or approximately $145 million, and a 22%32% increase in ourthe regular quarterly dividend to $0.28$0.45 per share. We plan to continue share repurchases under the June 2011 program, with the intent to repurchase $1.0 billion in shares over the next two years.

Other Financial Measures

Our current ratio, calculated as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.41.3 as of February 3, 2018, compared to 1.5 as of January 30, 2016, compared to 1.5 at the end of fiscal 2015.28, 2017. The lower current ratio in fiscal 20162018 was driven by a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, primarily from increased share repurchases, and an increase in the current liabilities dueportion of long-term debt related to our 2016 Notes being due in fiscal 2017 and a decrease in current assets due to a lower cash balance.2018 Notes.

Our debt to earnings ratio was 2.11.4 as of February 3, 2018, compared to 1.1 as of January 30, 2016, compared28, 2017, primarily due to 1.3 as of January 31, 2015, due primarily to a decrease in netlower earnings from continuing operations in fiscal 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year.current year driven by an increase in tax expense associated with the Tax Act. Our adjustednon-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio which includes capitalized operating lease obligations in its calculation, was 2.6 and 2.8remained unchanged at 1.6 as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively. The decrease in the ratio was due to a decrease in capitalized operating lease obligations and an increase in EBITDAR.

Our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is considered a non-GAAP financial measure and should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, the most directly comparable ratio determined in accordance with GAAP. We have included this information in our MD&A as we view the adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio as an important indicator of our creditworthiness. Furthermore, we believe that our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is important for understanding our financial position and provides meaningful additional information about our ability to service our long-term debt and other fixed obligations and to fund our future growth. We also believe our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is relevant because it enables investors to compare our indebtedness to that of retailers who own, rather than lease, their stores. Our decision to own or lease real estate is based on an assessment of our financial liquidity, our capital structure, our desire to own or to lease the location, the owner’s desire to own or to lease the location, and the alternative that results in the highest return to our shareholders.
Our adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio is calculated as follows:

45


AdjustedNon-GAAP debt to EBITDAR =AdjustedNon-GAAP debt 
Non-GAAP EBITDAR 

The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to our adjustednon-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio is our debt to net earnings ratio, which excludes capitalized operating lease obligations from debt in the numerator of the calculation and does not adjust net earnings in the denominator of the calculation.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our debt to net earnings ratio to our adjustednon-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio for continuing operations ($ in millions):
2016(1)
 
2015(1)
2018(1)
 
2017(1)
Debt (including current portion)$1,734
 $1,613
$1,355
 $1,365
Capitalized operating lease obligations (8 times rental expense)(2)
6,266
 6,653
Adjusted debt$8,000
 $8,266
Capitalized operating lease obligations (5 times rental expense)(2)
3,914
 3,872
Non-GAAP debt$5,269
 $5,237
      
Net earnings from continuing operations$807
 $1,246
$999
 $1,207
Interest expense, net65
 63
Other income (including interest expense, net)26
 38
Income tax expense503
 141
818
 609
Depreciation and amortization expense(3)
656
 689
683
 654
Rental expense783
 832
782
 774
Restructuring charges and other(4)
263
 
EBITDAR$3,077
 $2,971
Restructuring charges(3)(4)
10
 39
Non-GAAP EBITDAR$3,318
 $3,321
      
Debt to net earnings ratio2.1
 1.3
1.4
 1.1
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratio2.6
 2.8
Non-GAAP debt to EBITDAR ratio1.6
 1.6
(1)Debt is reflected as of the balance sheet dates for each of the respective fiscal periods, while rental expense and the other components of non-GAAP EBITDAR represent activity for the 12 months ended January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015.28, 2017.
(2)The multiple of eightfive times annual rental expense in the calculation of our capitalized operating lease obligations is the multiple used for the retail sector by one of the nationally recognized credit rating agencies that rate our creditworthiness, and we consider it to be an appropriate multiple for our lease portfolio.
(3)Depreciation
Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and amortization expense includes impairmentsSupplementary Data, of fixed assets, investments and intangible assets (including impairments associated with our fiscal restructuring activities).this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the nature of these charges.
(4)Includes
Beginning in the impactfirst quarter of restructuringfiscal 2018, we no longer exclude non-restructuring property and equipment impairment charges non-restructuring asset impairments and CRT litigation settlements.from our non-GAAP financial measures. To ensure our financial results are comparable, we have recast the prior period balance to conform to this presentation. Refer to the Overview section within this MD&A for more information.


44




Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Other than operating leases, we do not have any off-balance-sheet financing. A summary of our operating lease obligations by fiscal year is included in the "Contractual Obligations" table below. Additional information regarding our operating leases is available in Item 2, Properties, and Note 8, Leases, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


46


The following table presents information regarding our contractual obligations as of February 3, 2018, with payments due by fiscal yearperiod ($ in millions):
   Payments Due by Period  Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations Total 
Less Than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More Than
5 Years
Total 
Less Than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More Than
5 Years
Long-term debt obligations(1)
 $1,518
 $350
 $513
 $
 $655
$1,150
 $500
 $650
 $
 $
Capital lease obligations 46
 14
 15
 5
 12
27
 7
 7
 4
 9
Financing lease obligations 212
 42
 64
 40
 66
219
 47
 79
 46
 47
Interest payments(2) 242
 59
 107
 76
 
147
 51
 77
 19
 
Operating lease obligations(2)(3)
 3,363
 813
 1,280
 749
 521
3,046
 791
 1,202
 653
 400
Purchase obligations(3)(4)
 2,033
 1,944
 73
 16
 
2,197
 2,093
 96
 8
 
Unrecognized tax benefits(4)(5)
 469
  
  
  
  
279
  
  
  
  
Deferred compensation(5)(6)
 34
  
  
  
  
27
  
  
  
  
Total $7,917
 $3,222
 $2,052
 $886
 $1,254
$7,092
 $3,489
 $2,111
 $730
 $456
Note: For additional information refer to Note 5,Debt; Note 8,Leases; Note 10,Income Taxes;Taxes; and Note 12,Contingencies and Commitments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8,Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1)Represents principal amounts only and excludes interest rate swap valuation adjustments.
(2)
Interest payments related to our 2018 Notes and 2021 Notes include the variable interest rate payments included in our interest rate swap. For additional information refer to Note 6, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3)Operating lease obligations do not include payments to landlords covering real estate taxes and common area maintenance. These charges, if included, would increase total operating lease obligations by $1.1 billion$900 million at January 30, 2016.February 3, 2018.
(3)(4)Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, are legally binding and specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase obligations do not include agreements that are cancelable without penalty. Additionally, although they aredo not contain legally binding agreements,purchase commitments, we included open purchase orders in the table above. Substantially all open purchase orders are fulfilled within 30 days.
(4)(5)Unrecognized tax benefits relate to uncertain tax positions. As we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of the payments or the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over time, the related balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.
(5)(6)Included in Long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, was a $34$27 million obligation for deferred compensation. As the specific payment dates for the deferred compensation are unknown, the related balances have not been reflected in the "Payments Due by Period" section of the table.

Additionally, we have $1.25 billion in undrawn capacity on our credit facilitiesfacility at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, which if drawn upon, would be included as short-term debt inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make assumptions and estimates about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believesbelieved to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, becauseBecause future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These estimates require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments because they relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. We have reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee

45




Except where noted, we have not made any material changes during the past three fiscal years, nor do we believe there is a reasonable likelihood of a material future change to the accounting methodologies for the areas described below.

Inventory

Description
Our merchandise inventories were $5.2 billion at February 3, 2018. We value our inventory at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value through the establishment of markdown and inventory lossmarkdown adjustments. Markdown adjustments reflect the excess of cost over the net proceedsrecovery we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or other

47


disposal of inventory and establish a new cost basis. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the reversal of previously recorded markdowns or an increase in that newly established cost basis. estimate
Markdown adjustments involve uncertainty because the calculations require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding factors such as forecastthe products to include in our analysis, the product’s condition, forecasted consumer demand, the promotional environment, the expected sales channel of ultimate disposition and technological obsolescence. We also apply judgment in the assumptions about net realizable value, including direct vendor allowances and selling and supply chain costs.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our markdown adjustments. However,Effect if actual outcomes are different than we anticipated, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. results differ from assumptions
A 10% change in our markdown adjustment at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $9$8 million in fiscal 2016.2018.

Vendor Allowances

Description
We receive allowancesfunds from certainour merchandise vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements. We treatarrangements, principally as a substantial majorityresult of purchase volumes, sales price protections or the promotion of a vendor’s product in our stores or through various advertising mediums. For the most part, these allowancesvendor funds do not represent the reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs that we incur to sell the vendor’s products. Therefore, we calculate and accrue for these funds as a reduction in the cost of inventory as the amounts are mutually agreed-upon with the vendor and recognize these funds as a reduction of cost of sales when the inventory is sold. Funds that are determined to be a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to sell a vendor's products are recorded as an offset to the costrelated expense.

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
Due to the quantity of the product or services provided. Sell-throughand diverse nature of individual vendor agreements, a deferral estimate is required for vendor allowances are collected whenreceived on inventory is sold to customers and recognized aspurchases. This estimate requires a reduction in cost of sales at that time. Certain other types of funding, most notably receipt-based allowances, are collected when we take receipt of inventory and deferred as a reduction of inventory until inventory is sold. The estimation of the deferral for these types of funding is complex and requires detailed analysis of factors, such as (1) product and vendor mix, (2) the nature and period the negotiated funding relates to in order to determine the allowances to defer, and (3) analysis and judgment regarding when the inventory turn and a large range of diverse allowance programs.is sold.

We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates orEffect if actual results differ from assumptions we use to calculate our vendor funding deferral.
A 10% differencechangee in our vendor funding deferral at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $21$24 million in fiscal 2016.

We also receive vendor allowances for achieving certain volume targets. These vendor allowances are accrued as earned over the incentive period, based on estimates of purchases. Amounts accrued throughout the program year could require adjustment if actual purchase volumes differ from projected purchase volumes, especially in the case of programs that provide for increased funding when graduated volume tiers are met. We believe that our estimate of vendor allowances earned based on expected volume of purchases over the incentive period is an accurate reflection of the ultimate allowances to be received from our vendors. Since most volume-based programs apply to a calendar year or our fiscal year, the amount of judgment required as of any fiscal year end is minimal.2018.

Property and Equipment Impairments

Description
Property and equipment assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

When evaluating property and equipment assets with impairment indicators for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value, which is typically based on estimated discounted future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an

We evaluate locations for triggering events on a quarterly basis to determine when a location’s asset carrying values may not be recoverable. For store locations, our primary indicator that asset carrying values may not be recoverable is negative operating income for the most recent 12-month period. We also monitor other factors when evaluating store locations for impairment, loss,including significant changes in the adjusted carrying amountmanner of use or expected life of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable asset, the new cost basis is depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.assets or significant changes in our business strategies.

When reviewing property and equipment assets for impairment, we group assets with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent
46




Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
Our impairment evaluations require us to apply judgment in determining whether a triggering event has occurred. Our impairment loss calculations require managementus to make assumptions and to apply judgment in order to estimate fair values, including estimatingfuture cash flows, including estimated sales, margin and expenses, as well as estimating lease lives and growth rates. We also apply judgment in forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting a discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If

Effect if actual results are not consistent with our estimates anddiffer from assumptions we may be exposed to impairments that could be material. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material
A 10% change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculateour non-restructuring property and equipment asset impairment losses.

Goodwill


48


Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment annuallyimpairments would have affected net earnings by approximately $1 million in the fiscal fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.

We test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level, which is one level below the operating segment level. Our detailed impairment testing involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of the reporting unit and is based on discounted cash flows or relative market-based approaches. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, then it is concluded that no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is required to measure possible goodwill impairment loss. The second step includes hypothetically valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying value.

The carrying value of goodwill at January 30, 2016, was $425 million, which related entirely to our Domestic segment. In fiscal 2016, we determined that the excess of fair value over carrying value was substantial. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to test for impairment losses on goodwill. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.2018.

Tax Contingencies

Description
Our income tax returns like those of most companies, are periodically audited by domesticU.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax authorities. These audits include questions regardingTax authorities audit our tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of income and deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. At any one time, manymultiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we may record a liability for such exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which we have established a liability, is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provisions in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available.

Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions.

Our effective income tax rate is also affected by changes in tax law, the tax jurisdiction of new stores or business ventures, the level of earnings and the results of tax audits.

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits contains uncertainties because management is required to make assumptions and apply judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions. Such assumptions can include complex and uncertain external factors, such as changes in tax law, interpretations of tax law and the timing of such changes, and uncertain internal factors such as taxable earnings by jurisdiction, the magnitude and timing of certain transactions and capital spending.

Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
Although we believe that the judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.

To the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of our established liability, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement generally would require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement may reduce our effective income tax rate and would be recognized in the period of resolution.

Revenue RecognitionTax Reform

The following accounting estimates relatingDescription
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Act which significantly changes U.S. tax law. Among other things, the Tax Act lowered the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to revenue recognition contain uncertainty because they require management21% effective January 1, 2018, broadened the base to make assumptionswhich U.S. income tax applies, imposed a one-time, deemed repatriation tax on net unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries not previously subject to U.S. income tax and to apply judgment regarding the effects ofeffectively created a new minimum tax on certain future events.foreign earnings.

Returns – We recognize revenue, net of estimated returns, atJudgments and uncertainties involved in the timeestimate
The SEC staff issued SAB 118 that provides guidance on accounting for the customer takes possession of merchandise or receives services. We estimate the liability for sales returns with a corresponding reduction to revenue and cost of sales based on historical return data. We believe that our estimate for sales returns, which represents the estimated gross margin impact of returns, is a reasonable reflectionthe Tax Act. SAB 118 allows companies to record provisional amounts to the extent that they are reasonably estimable and adjust them over time as more information becomes available, not to extend beyond the measurement period of future returns and financial impacts. However, if our estimates are significantly below or aboveone year from the actual return amounts, our reported revenue and costenactment of sales could be impacted. A 10% difference in our returns reserve at January 30, 2016, would have affected net earnings by approximately $2 million in fiscal 2016.the Tax Act.

As a result of the Tax Act, we recorded provisional tax expense in fiscal 2018 of $283 million. The $283 million included a $209 million charge associated with the deemed repatriation tax and a $74 million charge primarily related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the new tax rate.


4947




Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
Although we believe that the judgments and estimates discussed herein are reasonable, the ultimate impact of the Tax Act may differ materially from our provisional amounts due to further refinement of our calculations as allowed by SAB 118, changes in interpretations and assumptions we have made, or actions we may take as a result of the Tax Act. The provisional amounts will be finalized within the one-year measurement period as we gather and analyze the additional documentation necessary for the calculations. Refer to Note 10, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

Gift Card Breakage

Description
We sell gift cards to customers in our retail stores, through our websites and through select third parties. A liability is initially established for the value of the gift card when it is sold. We do not charge administrative fees on unused gift cards and our gift cards do not expire. We recognize revenue from gift cards when the card is redeemed by the customer. For unredeemed gift cards, we recognize breakage when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is deemed remote, and we determine that we do not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift cards to a relevant jurisdiction. We determine the breakage rate based on historical redemption patterns which show that afterand record projected breakage 24 months we can reasonably estimate breakage. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material changeafter card issuance.

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the future estimates or assumptionsestimate
There is inherent judgment in estimating gift card redemption patterns as they are susceptible to factors outside of our influence. However, we use to record breakage. However,have extensive history of breakage patterns. In general, uncertainty reduces significantly within a short time frame, as the majority of our gift card redemptions occur within the first year.

Effect if actual results are not consistent withdiffer from assumptions
A 10% change in our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.cumulative gift card breakage estimate at February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $37 million in fiscal 2018.

Customer Loyalty Programs

Description
We have customer loyalty programs which allow members to earn points for each purchase completed with us or when using our co-branded credit cards. Points earned enable members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases.purchases at our Best Buy branded stores. The value of points earned by our loyalty program members is included in accruedAccrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded as a reduction in revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the value of points that are projected to be redeemed. Our

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
There is inherent judgment in estimating the value of our customer loyalty programs as they are susceptible to factors outside of our influence, particularly customer redemption activity. However, we have significant experience in estimating the amount and timing of redemptions of certificates, is based primarily on historical data.

Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
A 10% differencechange in our customer loyalty point liabilityredemption rates at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $13$15 million in fiscal 2016.2018.

Service Revenue

Description
We do not believesell customers support plans as part of a bundled service offer which may include items such as technical support, extended warranty, anti-virus software and one-time service repairs. We allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative fair value. Revenue for our technical support plans is recognized over the contract term based on a straight-line or usage basis.

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
Our process for determining the fair value allocation of revenue to deliverables requires judgment as a portion of our deliverables require our best estimate of fair value. For revenue recognized on a usage basis, there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a materialjudgment inherent in our determination of the usage basis and related pattern of revenue. These judgment areas are also subject to change based on changes to our service offerings, including the types of support covered by the plan, products covered by plans, level of service required by customers, contract length, number of devices eligible for service and frequency and timing of customer support.

48

Table of Contents



Effect if actual results differ from assumptions
A 10% change in the futureamount of services membership deferred revenue as of February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $10 million in fiscal 2018.

Self-Insurance

Description
We are self-insured for certain losses related to health, workers' compensation and general liability claims; however, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to certain claims. Liabilities associated with these losses include estimates orof both claims filed and losses incurred but not yet reported. When estimating our self-insured liabilities, we consider a number of factors, including historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries.

Judgments and uncertainties involved in the estimate
Our self-insured liabilities require us to apply judgment and make assumptions to estimate the ultimate cost to settle reported claims and claims incurred but not reported as of our revenue recognition critical accounting estimates. However,the balance sheet date. These estimates include a variety of inputs, including projected exposures, actual versus expected results, number of open claims, frequency of claims, severity of claims and historical loss development patterns of claims.

Effect if actual results are not consistent withdiffer from assumptions
A 10% change in our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.self-insured liabilities as of February 3, 2018, would have affected net earnings by approximately $9 million in fiscal 2018.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a description of new applicable accounting pronouncements, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




50

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In addition to the risks inherent in our operations, we are exposed to certain market risks.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in short-term market interest rates and these changes in rates will impact our net interest expense. Our cash and short-term investments generate interest income that will vary based on changes in short-term interest rates, andrates. In addition, we have also swapped a portionall of our fixed-rate debt to floating-rate such that the interest expense on this debt will vary with short-term interest rates. Refer to Note 5, Debt, and Note 6, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our interest rate swaps.

As of January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, we had $3.3$3.1 billion of cash and short-term investments and $750 million$1.2 billion of debt that has been swapped to floating rate. Therefore, we had net cash and short-term investments of $2.6$2.0 billion generating income whichthat is exposed to interest rate changes. As of January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, a 50 basis point increase in short-term interest rates would leadhave led to an estimated $13$10 million reduction in net interest expense, and conversely a 50 basis point decrease in short-term interest rates would leadhave led to an estimated $13$10 million increase in net interest expense.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We have market risk arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our International segment operations. On a limited basis, we utilize foreign exchange forward contracts to manage foreign currency exposure to certain forecastforecasted inventory purchases, recognized receivable and payable balances and our investment in our Canadian operations. Our primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of net earnings and cash flows, as well as of the net asset value associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our foreign currency risk management strategy includes both hedging instruments and derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments, which generally have terms of up to 12 months. Refer to Note 6, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding our these instruments.


49

Table of Contents



The strengthweakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso compared to the prior-year period had a negativepositive overall impact on our revenue as these currencies translated into fewermore U.S. dollars. Exchange rate fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to the Mexican peso compared to the prior-year period had an immaterial impact in the current year. We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a net favorable impact on our revenue in fiscal 2018 of approximately $85 million and a net favorable impact on earnings of $4 million. In fiscal 2017, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a net unfavorable impact on our revenue in fiscal 2016 of approximately $534$76 million and a net favorable impact on earnings of $20 million. In fiscal 2015, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had an unfavorable impact on our revenue of approximately $308 million and an unfavorable impact on earnings of $4 million.

5150

Table of Contents



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Management's Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related financial information. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP and necessarily include certain amounts that are based on estimates and informed judgments. Our management also prepared the related financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is responsible for its accuracy and consistency with the consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, which conducted its audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The independent registered public accounting firm's responsibility is to express an opinion as to the fairness with whichwhether such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our Board, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)Pertainpertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets;

(2)Provideprovide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and Board; and

(3)Provideprovide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018. During our assessment, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an unqualified attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018.

 
Hubert Joly
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(duly authorized and principal executive officer)
 
Sharon L. McCollamCorie Barry
Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized and principal financial officer)


5251

Table of Contents



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Richfield, Minnesota

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018 and January 31, 2015 and28, 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 2016. Our audits also includedFebruary 3, 2018, and the financial statementrelated notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). TheseIn our opinion, the financial statements andpresent fairly, in all material respects, the financial statement schedule are the responsibilityposition of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statementsCompany as of February 3, 2018 and financial statement schedule based on our audits.January 28, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We conducted our auditshave also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 2, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years ended January 30, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 23, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 23, 2016April 2, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since fiscal 2006.


5352

Table of Contents



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Best Buy Co., Inc.:
Richfield, Minnesota

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Best Buy Co., Inc. and subsidiaries (the(the “Company”), as of January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control -Integrated- Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended February 3, 2018, of the Company and our report dated April 2, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, of the Company and our report dated March 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 23, 2016April 2, 2018


5453

Table of Contents




Consolidated Balance Sheets
$ in millions, except per share and share amounts
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Assets        
Current Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents $1,976
 $2,432
 $1,101
 $2,240
Short-term investments 1,305
 1,456
 2,032
 1,681
Receivables, net 1,162
 1,280
 1,049
 1,347
Merchandise inventories 5,051
 5,174
 5,209
 4,864
Other current assets 392
 449
 438
 384
Current assets held for sale 
 681
Total current assets 9,886
 11,472
 9,829
 10,516
Property and Equipment        
Land and buildings 613
 611
 623
 618
Leasehold improvements 2,220
 2,201
 2,327
 2,227
Fixtures and equipment 5,002
 4,729
 5,410
 4,998
Property under capital and financing leases 272
 119
 340
 300
 8,107
 7,660
 8,700
 8,143
Less accumulated depreciation 5,761
 5,365
 6,279
 5,850
Net property and equipment 2,346
 2,295
 2,421
 2,293
Goodwill 425
 425
 425
 425
Intangibles, Net 18
 57
Other Assets 813
 829
 374
 622
Non-current assets held for sale 31
 167
Total Assets $13,519
 $15,245
 $13,049
 $13,856
        
Liabilities and Equity        
Current Liabilities        
Accounts payable $4,450
 $5,030
 $4,873
 $4,984
Unredeemed gift card liabilities 409
 411
 385
 427
Deferred revenue 357
 326
 453
 418
Accrued compensation and related expenses 384
 372
 561
 358
Accrued liabilities 802
 782
 864
 865
Accrued income taxes 128
 230
 137
 26
Current portion of long-term debt 395
 41
 544
 44
Current liabilities held for sale 
 585
Total current liabilities 6,925
 7,777
 7,817
 7,122
Long-Term Liabilities 877
 881
 809
 704
Long-Term Debt 1,339
 1,572
 811
 1,321
Contingencies and Commitments (Note 12) 
 
 
 
Long-Term Liabilities held for sale 
 15
Equity        
Best Buy Co., Inc. Shareholders' Equity        
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized — 400,000 shares; Issued and outstanding — none 
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized — 1.0 billion shares; Issued and outstanding — 323,779,000 and 351,468,000 shares, respectively 32
 35
Prepaid share repurchase (55) 
Common stock, $0.10 par value: Authorized — 1.0 billion shares; Issued and outstanding — 282,988,000 and 311,108,000 shares, respectively 28
 31
Additional paid-in capital 
 437
 
 
Retained earnings 4,130
 4,141
 3,270
 4,399
Accumulated other comprehensive income 271
 382
 314
 279
Total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders' equity 4,378
 4,995
Noncontrolling interests 
 5
Total equity 4,378
 5,000
 3,612
 4,709
Total Liabilities and Equity $13,519
 $15,245
 $13,049
 $13,856
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5554

Table of Contents



Consolidated Statements of Earnings
$ and shares in millions, except per share amounts
Fiscal Years Ended January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Revenue $39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
$42,151
 $39,403
 $39,528
Cost of goods sold 30,334
 31,292
 31,212
32,275
 29,963
 30,334
Restructuring charges — cost of goods sold 3
 
 

 
 3
Gross profit 9,191
 9,047
 9,399
9,876
 9,440
 9,191
Selling, general and administrative expenses 7,618
 7,592
 8,106
8,023
 7,547
 7,618
Restructuring charges 198
 5
 149
10
 39
 198
Operating income 1,375
 1,450
 1,144
1,843
 1,854
 1,375
Other income (expense)           
Gain on sale of investments 2
 13
 20
1
 3
 2
Investment income and other 13
 14
 19
48
 31
 13
Interest expense (80) (90) (100)(75) (72) (80)
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense 1,310
 1,387
 1,083
1,817
 1,816
 1,310
Income tax expense 503
 141
 388
818
 609
 503
Net earnings from continuing operations 807
 1,246
 695
999
 1,207
 807
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 2), net of tax benefit (expense) of $(1), $0 and $31 90
 (11) (172)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests 897
 1,235
 523
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests 
 (2) 9
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $897
 $1,233
 $532
Gain from discontinued operations (Note 2), net of tax expense of $0, $7 and $1, respectively1
 21
 90
Net earnings$1,000
 $1,228
 $897
           
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders      
Basic earnings per share     
Continuing operations $2.33
 $3.57
 $2.03
$3.33
 $3.79
 $2.33
Discontinued operations 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47)
 0.07
 0.26
Basic earnings per share $2.59
 $3.53
 $1.56
$3.33
 $3.86
 $2.59
           
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders      
Diluted earnings per share     
Continuing operations $2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
$3.26
 $3.74
 $2.30
Discontinued operations 0.26
 (0.04) (0.47)
 0.07
 0.26
Diluted earnings per share $2.56
 $3.49
 $1.53
$3.26
 $3.81
 $2.56
           
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions)      
Weighted-average common shares outstanding     
Basic 346.5
 349.5
 342.1
300.4
 318.5
 346.5
Diluted 350.7
 353.6
 347.6
307.1
 322.6
 350.7
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


5655

Table of Contents



Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
$ in millions
Fiscal Years Ended January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests $897
 $1,235
 $523
Foreign currency translation adjustments (44) (103) (147)
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments 
 (3) 6
Reclassification of foreign currency translations adjustments into earnings due to sale of business (67) 
 654
Reclassification of (gains) losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings 
 (4) 2
Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests 786
 1,125
 1,038
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests 
 (2) (126)
Comprehensive income attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders $786
 $1,123
 $912

Fiscal Years EndedFebruary 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Net earnings$1,000
 $1,228
 $897
Foreign currency translation adjustments35
 10
 (44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translations adjustments into earnings due to sale of business
 (2) (67)
Comprehensive income$1,035
 $1,236
 $786
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5756

Table of Contents




Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
$ in millions
Fiscal Years Ended January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015 February 1, 2014February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Operating Activities    
  
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests $897
 $1,235
 $523
Operating activities   
  
Net earnings$1,000
 $1,228
 $897
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to total cash provided by operating activities:           
Depreciation 657
 656
 701
683
 654
 657
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets 
 
 15
Restructuring charges 201
 23
 259
10
 39
 201
(Gain) Loss on sale of business (99) (1) 143
Gain on sale of business
 
 (99)
Stock-based compensation 104
 87
 90
129
 108
 104
Deferred income taxes 49
 (297) (28)162
 201
 49
Other, net 38
 8
 62
(13) (17) 59
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:           
Receivables 123
 (19) 7
315
 (193) 123
Merchandise inventories 86
 (141) 597
(335) 199
 86
Other assets 36
 29
 (70)(21) 10
 36
Accounts payable (536) 434
 (986)(196) 518
 (536)
Other liabilities (140) (164) (273)117
 23
 (140)
Income taxes (94) 85
 54
290
 (213) (94)
Total cash provided by operating activities 1,322
 1,935
 1,094
2,141
 2,557
 1,343
Investing Activities      
Additions to property and equipment, net of $92, $14 and $13 of non-cash capital expenditures (649) (561) (547)
Investing activities     
Additions to property and equipment, net of $123, $48 and $92, respectively, of non-cash capital expenditures(688) (580) (649)
Purchases of investments (2,281) (2,804) (230)(4,325) (3,045) (2,281)
Sales of investments 2,427
 1,580
 50
4,018
 2,689
 2,427
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred 103
 39
 206

 
 (51)
Change in restricted assets (47) 29
 5
Proceeds from property disposition2
 56
 
Other, net 28
 5
 (1)(9) 3
 28
Total cash used in investing activities (419) (1,712) (517)(1,002) (877) (526)
Financing Activities      
Financing activities     
Repurchase of common stock (1,000) 
 
(2,004) (698) (1,000)
Prepayment of accelerated share repurchase (55) 
 

 
 (55)
Issuance of common stock 47
 50
 171
163
 171
 47
Dividends paid (499) (251) (233)(409) (505) (499)
Repayments of debt (28) (24) (2,033)(46) (394) (28)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 
 
 2,414
Other, net 20
 2
 
(1) 8
 (1)
Total cash provided by (used in) financing activities (1,515) (223) 319
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash (38) (52) (44)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (650) (52) 852
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period, Excluding Held for Sale 2,432
 2,678
 1,826
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held for Sale at Beginning of Period 194
 
 
Cash and Cash equivalents at End of Period 1,976

2,626

2,678
Cash and Cash Equivalents Held for Sale at End of Period 
 (194) 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period, Excluding Held for Sale $1,976

$2,432

$2,678
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information      
Total cash used in financing activities(2,297) (1,418) (1,536)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash25
 10
 (38)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(1,133) 272
 (757)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period, excluding held for sale2,433
 2,161
 2,616
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period, held for sale
 
 302
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$1,300

$2,433

$2,161
     
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information     
Income taxes paid $550
 $355
 $332
$366
 $628
 $550
Interest paid 77
 81
 82
81
 76
 77
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



5857

Table of Contents



Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
$ and shares in millions, except per share amounts
Common
Shares

 
Common
Stock

 Prepaid Share Repurchase
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 
Retained
Earnings

 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 
Total Best 
Buy Co., Inc.
Shareholders'
Equity

 
Non
controlling
Interests

 
Total
Equity

Common
Shares

 
Common
Stock

 Prepaid Share Repurchase
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital

 
Retained
Earnings

 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 
Total Best 
Buy Co., Inc.
Shareholders'
Equity

 
Non
controlling
Interests

 
Total
Equity

Balances at February 2, 2013338
 34
 
 54
 2,861
 112
 3,061
 654
 3,715
Net earnings (loss)
 
 
 
 532
 
 532
 (9) 523
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (136) (136) (11) (147)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 
 7
 7
 (1) 6
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 508
 508
 146
 654
Reclassification of losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
 1
 2
Sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (776) (776)
Dividend distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Tax loss from stock options canceled or exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 (22) 
 
 (22) 
 (22)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan1
 
 
 13
 
 
 13
 
 13
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 97
 
 
 97
 
 97
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised8
 1
 
 158
 
 
 159
 
 159
Common stock dividends, $0.68 per share
 
 
 
 (234) 
 (234) 
 (234)
Balances at February 1, 2014347
 35
 
 300
 3,159
 492
 3,986
 3
 3,989
Net earnings
 
 
 
 1,233
 
 1,233
 2
 1,235
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (103) (103) 
 (103)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 
 
 
 
 (3) (3) 
 (3)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 (4) (4) 
 (4)
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 8
 
 
 8
 
 8
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 87
 
 
 87
 
 87
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised5
 
 
 42
 
 
 42
 
 42
Common stock dividends, $0.72 per share
 
 
 
 (251) 
 (251) 
 (251)
Balances at January 31, 2015352
 35
 
 437
 4,141
 382
 4,995
 5
 5,000
352
 $35
 $
 $437
 $4,141
 $382
 $4,995
 $5
 $5,000
Net earnings
 
 
 
 897
 
 897
 
 897

 
 
 
 897
 
 897
 
 897
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:                                 

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 (44) (44) 
 (44)
 
 
 
 
 (44) (44) 
 (44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 (67) (67) 
 (67)
 
 
 
 
 (67) (67) 
 (67)
Prepaid repurchase of common stock
 
 (55) 
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 104
 
 
 104
 
 104
Sale of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (5) (5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (5) (5)
Prepaid repurchase of common stock
 
 (55) 
 
 
 (55) 
 (55)
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised5
 
 
 40
 
 
 40
 
 40
Common stock dividends, $1.43 per share
 
 
 3
 (504) 
 (501) 
 (501)
Tax benefits from stock options exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 2
 
 
 2
 
 2
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
 
 7
Repurchase of common stock(33) (3) 
 (593) (404) 
 (1,000) 
 (1,000)
Balances at January 30, 2016324
 32
 (55) 
 4,130
 271
 4,378
 
 4,378
Net earnings
 
 
 
 1,228
 
 1,228
 
 1,228
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                
Foreign currency translation adjustments��
 
 
 
 
 10
 10
 
 10
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings
 
 
 
 
 (2) (2) 
 (2)
Settlement of accelerated share repurchase
 
 55
 
 
 
 55
 
 55
Tax benefits from stock options exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 17
 
 
 17
 
 17
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised8
 1
 
 163
 
 
 164
 
 164
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
 
 7
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 108
 
 
 108
 
 108
Common stock dividends, $1.57 per share
 
 
 
 (505) 
 (505) 
 (505)
Repurchase of common stock(21) (2) 
 (295) (454) 
 (751) 
 (751)
Balances at January 28, 2017311
 31
 
 
 4,399
 279
 4,709
 
 4,709
Adoption of ASU 2016-09
 
 
 10
 (12) 
 (2) 
 (2)
Net earnings
 
 
 
 1,000
 
 1,000
 
 1,000
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:                 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 
 
 35
 35
 
 35
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
 
 7

 
 
 7
 
 
 7
 
 7
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 104
 
 
 104
 
 104

 
 
 129
 
 
 129
 
 129
Restricted stock vested and stock options exercised5
 
 
 40
 
 
 40
 
 40
7
 1
 
 155
 
 
 156
 
 156
Tax benefits from stock options exercised, restricted stock vesting and employee stock purchase plan
 
 
 2
 
 
 2
 
 2
Common stock dividends, $1.43 per share
 
 
��3
 (504) 
 (501) 
 (501)
Common stock dividends, $1.36 per share
 
 
 
 (411) 
 (411) 
 (411)
Repurchase of common stock(33) (3) 
 (593) (404) 
 (1,000) 
 (1,000)(35) (4) 
 (299) (1,706) 
 (2,009) 
 (2,009)
Balances at January 30, 2016324
 $32
 $(55) $
 $4,130
 $271
 $4,378
 $
 $4,378
Other
 
 
 (2) 
 
 (2) 
 (2)
Balances at February 3, 2018283
 $28
 $
 $
 $3,270
 $314
 $3,612
 $
 $3,612
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5958

Table of Contents



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms "Best Buy," "we," "us" and "our" in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements refers to Best Buy Co., Inc. and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries.

Discontinued Operations

On June 26, 2013, we sold our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe Distributions Limited ("Best Buy Europe"). On February 1, 2014, we sold mindSHIFT Technologies, Inc. ("mindSHIFT"). On February 13, 2015, we sold Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Limited ("Five Star"). The results of Best Buy Europe, mindSHIFT and Five Star are presented as discontinued operations for all periods. See Note 2, Discontinued Operations, for further information.

Description of Business

We are a leading provider of technology products, services and solutions. We offer these products and services to the customers who visit our stores, engage with Geek Squad agents or use our websites or mobile applications. We have operations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. We have two reportable segments: Domestic and International. The Domestic segment is comprised of the operations in all states, districts and territories of the U.S., under various brand names including Best Buy, bestbuy.com, Best Buy Mobile, Best Buy Direct, Best Buy Express, Geek Squad, Magnolia Home Theater and Pacific Kitchen and Home. The International segment is comprised of all operations in Canada and Mexico under the brand names Best Buy, bestbuy.com.ca, bestbuy.com.mx, Best Buy Express, Best Buy Mobile and Geek Squad.Squad and the domain names bestbuy.ca and bestbuy.com.mx.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Best Buy Co., Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

In order to align our fiscal reporting periods and comply with statutory filing requirements, we consolidate the financial results of our Mexico operations as well as our discontinued Europe and China operations, on a one-month lag. Our policy is to accelerate recording the effect of events occurring in the lag period that significantly affect our consolidated financial statements. No significant intervening event occurred in these operations that would have materially affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or other factors had it been recorded during fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 or 2014.2016.

In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we evaluated the period from January 31, 2016, through the date the financial statements were issued for material subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure. Other than as described inDiscontinued Operations

Discontinued operations are primarily comprised of Jiangsu Five Star Appliance Co., Limited ("Five Star") within our International segment. See Note 5,2, DebtDiscontinued Operations, and Note 7, Shareholders' Equity, no such events were identified for this period.further information.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. ("GAAP") requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Future results could be materially affected if actual results were to differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the end of January. Fiscal 2016, 2015,2018 included 53 weeks, with the additional week occurring in the fourth quarter, and 2014fiscal 2017 and 2016 each included 52 weeks.

NewUnadopted Accounting Pronouncements

In AprilMay 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-18,2014-09, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Components of an Entity. Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new guidance amends the definitionestablishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. It introduces a five-step process for revenue recognition that focuses on transfer of a discontinued operationcontrol, as opposed to transfer of risk and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. rewards under current guidance.

We adopted the new guidancewill adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2016, and2019 using the adoptionmodified retrospective method. Under this method, we will recognize the cumulative effect of the new guidance didchanges in retained earnings at the date of adoption, but will not have a materialrestate prior periods. We currently estimate the pre-tax impact of these changes to increase retained earnings by approximately $75 million to $100 million. We expect the impact of adoption to be immaterial to net earnings on our consolidated financial statements.an ongoing basis.

Our adoption assessment included a detailed review of contracts for each revenue stream and a comparison of historical accounting policies to the new standard. Based on these procedures, we have determined the impact will be (1) minor changes

6059

Table of Contents

to the timing of recognition of revenues related to our gift cards and loyalty programs and certain third-party software licenses where we are the agent, and (2) presentation changes to certain immaterial revenues that are currently reported on a gross or net basis. In May 2014,addition, the FASB issuedbalance sheet presentation of our sales return reserve will change to present a separate return asset and liability, instead of net presentation used currently.

As part of our adoption, we have modified our control procedures and processes, including reporting logic from impacted systems, although we do not expect these updates to have a material effect on our internal controls over financial reporting.

Additionally, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contractswill result in increased footnote disclosures, particularly with Customers, as a new Topic. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606. The new guidance provides a comprehensive framework forregard to (1) revenue-related balance sheet accounts and associated activity in the analysisfiscal period, (2) disaggregation of revenue transactionsby channel and will applyproduct category, (3) unsatisfied performance obligations for our service contracts with a duration of over one year, (4) the pro-forma impact of changes to all of our revenue streams. Based on the current effective dates, the new guidance would first apply in the first quarter of our fiscal 2019. While we are still in the process of evaluating the effect of adoption on our financial statements we do not currently expect a material impact onin the initial year of adoption, and (5) qualitative disclosures related to the nature and terms of our resultssales, timing of operations, cash flows or financial position.the transfer of control and judgments used in our application of the five-step process.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases.Leases,and has since issued additional ASUs to further clarify or add options to the issued guidance. The new guidance was issued to increase transparency and comparability among companies by requiring most leases to be included on the balance sheet and by expanding disclosure requirements. Based on the current effective dates, we expect to adopt the new guidance would first apply in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 using the recently-proposed prospective method and have begun implementing required upgrades to our fiscal 2020. Weexisting lease systems. While we expect adoption to lead to a material increase in the assets and liabilities recorded on our balance sheet and an increase to our footnote disclosures related to leases, we are still evaluating the impact on our consolidated statement of earnings. We also expect that adoption of the new standard will require changes to our internal controls over financial reporting.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The new guidance requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. We will adopt ASU 2016-16 in the processfirst quarter of evaluatingfiscal 2019. Based on our preliminary assessment, we believe the effectimpact of adoption onadopting the new guidance will be immaterial to our annual and interim financial statements.

ChangesIn August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging. The new guidance amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. Based on the effective dates, we will prospectively adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We believe the impact will be immaterial to our annual and interim financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The new guidance allows the reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The guidance is effective for our fiscal 2020, with early adoption permitted. We plan to early adopt ASU 2018-02 in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Based on our preliminary assessment, we believe the impact will be immaterial to our annual and interim financial statements.

Adopted Accounting PrinciplesPronouncements

In the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2016,2018, we adopted the following ASUs:

The FASB issued ASU 2015-03,2015-11, Inventory: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs in April 2015and ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit ArrangementsInventory in August 2015. The new guidance aligns the treatment of debt issuance costs, with the exception of debt issuance costs related to lines of credit, with the treatment of debt discounts, so that the debt issuance costs are presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15.. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are now recognized in our provision for income taxes as a discrete event rather than as a component of shareholders’ equity. In November 2015,addition, we elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The cumulative effect of this policy change amounted to $12 million, net of tax, and was recorded as a reduction to our retained earnings opening balance. Finally, we elected to present the FASB issued Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on a retrospective transition method and prior periods have been adjusted to present excess tax benefits as cash flows from operating activities.

ASU 2015-17,2016-15, Balance SheetStatement of Cash Flows: Classification of Deferred Taxes.Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, and ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. The new guidance is partretrospective adoption increased our beginning and ending cash balances within our statement of the simplification initiative and requires all deferred income tax liabilities and assets to be classified as non-current. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-17.cash flows. The adoption did not have ahad no other material impacts to our cash flow statement and had no impact on our results of operations cash flows or financial position.


60

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Cash Flows line items impacted by the adoption of these two standards for fiscal 2015:at January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016:
Balance Sheet2015 Reported ASU 2015-03 & 2015-15 Adjustments ASU 2015-17 Adjustments 2015 Adjusted
Other current assets$703
 $(2) $(252) $449
Current assets held for sale684
 
 (3) 681
Other assets583
 (6) 252
 829
   Total assets$15,256
 $(8) $(3) $15,245
        
Long-term debt$1,580
 $(8) $
 $1,572
Long-term liabilities held for sale18
 
 (3) 15
   Total liabilities & equity$15,256
 $(8) $(3) $15,245
 January 28, 2017 Reported ASU 2016-09 Adjustment ASU 2016-15 Adjustment ASU 2016-18 Adjustment January 28, 2017 Adjusted
Operating activities         
Other, net$(31) $14
 $
 $
 $(17)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Receivables(185) 
 (8) 
 (193)
Merchandise inventories193
 
 6
 
 199
Total cash provided by (used in) operating activities2,545
 14
 (2) 
 2,557
Investing activities
 
 
 
 
Additions to property and equipment, net(582) 
 2
 
 (580)
Change in restricted assets(8) 
 
 8
 
Total cash provided by (used in) investing activities(887) 
 2
 8
 (877)
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
Other, net22
 (14) 
 
 8
Total cash used in financing activities(1,404) (14) 
 
 (1,418)
Increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash264
 
 
 8
 272
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period1,976
 
 
 185
 2,161
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$2,240
 $
 $
 $193
 $2,433

 January 30, 2016 Reported ASU 2016-09 Adjustment ASU 2016-15 Adjustment ASU 2016-18 Adjustment January 30, 2016 Adjusted
Operating activities         
Other, net$38
 $21
 $
 $
 $59
Total cash provided by operating activities1,322
 21
 
 
 1,343
Investing activities         
Proceeds from sale of business, net of cash transferred103
 
 
 (154) (51)
Change in restricted assets(47) 
 
 47
 
Total cash used in investing activities(419) 
 
 (107) (526)
Financing activities         
Other, net20
 (21) 
 
 (1)
Total cash used in financing activities(1,515) (21) 
 
 (1,536)
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(650) 
 
 (107) (757)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period, excluding held for sale2,432
 
 
 184
 2,616
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period, held for sale194
 
 
 108
 302
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$1,976
 $
 $
 $185
 $2,161


61

Table of Contents

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a reconciliation of Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within our Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total shown in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$2,240
 $1,976
Restricted cash included in Other current assets193
 185
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$2,433
 $2,161

Amounts included in restricted cash are pledged as collateral or restricted to use for general liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash primarily consists of cash on hand and bank deposits. Cash equivalents consist of money market funds, treasury bills, commercial paper, corporate bonds and time deposits with an original maturity of 3 months or less when purchased. The amounts of cash equivalents at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, were $1,208$524 million and $1,660$1,531 million, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates were 0.5%1.1% and 0.4%0.5%, respectively.

Receivables

Receivables consist principally of amounts due from mobile phone network operators for device sales and commissions, earned; banks for customer credit card and debit card transactions;transactions and vendors for various vendor funding programs.

We establish allowances for uncollectible receivables based on historical collection trends and write-off history. Our allowances for uncollectible receivables were $49$37 million and $59$52 million at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively.

61


Merchandise Inventories

Merchandise inventories are recorded at the lower of cost usingor net realizable value and the weighted average method is used to determine the cost or market.of inventory. In-bound freight-related costs from our vendors are included as part of the net cost of merchandise inventories. Also included in the cost of inventory are certain vendor allowances that are not a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs to promote a vendor's products. Other costs associated with acquiring, storing and transporting merchandise inventories to our retail stores are expensed as incurred and included in cost of goods sold.

Our inventory valuation reflects adjustments for anticipated physical inventory losses (e.g., theft) that have occurred since the last physical inventory. Physical inventory counts are taken on a regular basis to ensure that the inventory reported in our consolidated financial statements is properly stated.

Our inventory valuation also reflects markdownsmarkdown adjustments for the excess of the cost over the amountnet recovery we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or other disposal of the inventory. Markdownsinventory and establish a new cost basis for our inventory.basis. Subsequent changes in facts or circumstances do not result in the reversal of previously recorded markdownsmarkdown adjustments or an increase in the newly established cost basis.

Restricted Assets

Restricted cash totaled $185$199 million and $193 million at February 3, 2018, and January 30, 201628, 2017, respectively, and is included in other current assets. Restricted cash totaled $292 million at January 31, 2015, of which $184 million is related to continuing operations and included in otherOther current assets and $108 million is included in current assets held for sale inon our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. Such balances are pledged as collateral or restricted to use for general liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the period from the date the assets are placed in service to the end of the lease term, which includes optional renewal periods if they are reasonably assured. Accelerated depreciation methods are generally used for income tax purposes.

62


When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from our Consolidated Balance Sheets and any resulting gain or loss is reflected inon our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Repairs and maintenance costs are charged directly to expense as incurred. Major renewals or replacements that substantially extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated.

Costs associated with the acquisition or development of software for internal use are capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the software, generally from threetwo to seven years. A subsequent addition, modification or upgrade to internal-use software is capitalized to the extent that it enhances the software's functionality or extends its useful life. Capitalized software is included in fixtures and equipment. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period incurred.

Property under capital and financing leases is comprised of buildings and equipment used in our operations. The related depreciation for capital and financing leasesThese assets is included in depreciation expense.are typically depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. The carrying value of property under capital and financing leases was $165$184 million and $44$166 million at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $107$156 million and $75$134 million, respectively.

Estimated useful lives by major asset category are as follows:
Asset
Life
(in years)
Buildings355-35
Leasehold improvements3-253-15
Fixtures and equipment3-202-15
Property under capital and financing leases2-203-5


62


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Costs Associated With Exit Activities

Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Factors considered important that could result in an impairment review include, but are not limited to, negative operating income for the most recent 12-month period, significant under-performance relative to historical or planned operating results, significant changes in the manner of use or expected life of the assets or significant changes in our business strategies. An impairment loss is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from the disposition of the asset, (if any)if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset net of other liabilities. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value using valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis.

When reviewing long-lived assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For example, long-lived assets deployed at store locations are reviewed for impairment at the individual store level, which involves comparing the carrying value of all land, buildings, leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment located at each store to the net cash flow projections for each store. In addition, we conduct separate impairment reviews at other levels as appropriate, for example, to evaluate potential impairment of assets shared by several areas of operations, such as information technology systems. Refer to Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, for further information associated with the long-lived assetsasset impairments, including valuation techniques used, impairment charges incurred and remaining carrying values.

The present value of costs associated with vacated properties, primarily future lease costs (netnet of expected sublease income),income, are charged to earnings when we cease using the property. We accelerate depreciation on property and equipment we expect to retire when a decision is made to abandon a property.

At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, the obligation associated with vacant properties included in accruedAccrued liabilities inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $44$17 million and $26$29 million, respectively, and the obligation associated with vacant properties included in long-termLong-term liabilities inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $54$21 million and $43$37 million, respectively. The obligation associated with vacant properties at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, included amounts associated with our restructuring activities as further described in Note 4, Restructuring Charges.


63


Leases

We conduct the majority of our retail and distribution operations from leased locations. The leases generally require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, in addition to rent. The terms of our new lease agreements for large-format stores are generally less than 10 years, although we have existing leases with terms up to 20 years. Small-format stores generally have lease terms that are half the length of large-format stores.less than 3 years. Most of the leases contain renewal options and escalation clauses, and certain store leases require contingent rents based on factors such as specified percentages of revenue or the consumer price index.

For leases that contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rent, we recognize the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date we take possession of the property to the end of the initial lease term. We record any difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases as part of deferred rent, in accrued liabilities or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

Cash or lease incentives received upon entering into certain store leases ("tenant allowances") are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent from the date we take possession of the property through the end of the initial lease term. We record the unamortized portion of tenant allowances as a part of deferred rent, in accrued liabilities or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, deferred rent included in accruedAccrued liabilities inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $36$30 million and $31$33 million, respectively, and deferred rent included in long-termLong-term liabilities inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $139$107 million and $195$121 million, respectively.

In addition, we have financing leases for agreements when we are deemed the owner of the leased buildings, typically due to significant involvement during the construction period, and do not qualify for sales recognition under the sale-leaseback accounting guidance. We record the cost of the building in property and equipment, with the related short-term liability recorded in current portion of long-term debt.debt and the long-term liability recorded in long-Term Debt. At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, we had $178$191 million and $69$177 million, respectively, outstanding under financing lease obligations. The increase in financing lease obligations was primarily dueRefer to renewals on existing leases.Note 8, Leases, for maturity details.

63


Assets acquired under capital and financing leases are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term, including renewal periods, if reasonably assured.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. We test goodwill for impairment annually, as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter, or when indications of potential impairment exist. We monitor the existence of potential impairment indicators throughout the fiscal year. We test for goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level and our reporting units are the components of operating segments which constitute businesses for which discrete financial information is available and is regularly reviewed by segment management. No components were aggregated in arriving at our reporting units. Our only reporting unit with a goodwill balance at the beginning of fiscal 20162018 was our Domestic segment.

Our detailed impairment testing involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair value reflects the price a market participant would be willing to pay in a potential sale of the reporting unit and is based on discounted cash flows or relative market-based approaches. If the fair value exceeds carrying value, then it is concluded that no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a second step is required to measure possible goodwill impairment loss. The second step includes hypothetically valuing the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying value. No goodwill impairment was recorded in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016,2018, we determined that the fair value of the Best Buy Domestic reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, and as a result, no goodwill impairment was recorded. No goodwill impairment was recorded in fiscal 2017 or 2016.


64


Tradenames

We include our tradenames and customer relationships within intangibles, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have an indefinite-lived tradename related to Pacific Sales included within our Domestic segment.segment, which is recorded within Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of the end of fiscal 2016,2018, we have no indefinite-lived tradenames within our International segment.

Our valuation of identifiable intangible assets acquired is based on information and assumptions available to us at the time of acquisition, using income and market approaches to determine fair value. We do not amortize our indefinite-lived tradenames, but test for impairment annually, or when indications of potential impairment exist. We utilize the relief from royalty method to determine the fair value of each of our indefinite-lived tradenames.tradename. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, we recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess. As a partIn fiscal 2018, we determined that the fair value of the Canada brand restructuring,tradenames exceeded their carrying value, and as a result, no impairment was recorded. No impairments were recorded in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2016, we fully impaired therecorded a $39 million impairment related to our indefinite-lived Future Shop tradename during fiscal 2016.as part of the Canadian brand consolidation. Refer to Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for additional information. No other impairments were identified duringin fiscal 2016.


64


The changes inFebruary 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016, the carrying amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived tradenames by segment were as follows in fiscal 2016, 2015was $425 million and 2014 ($ in millions):$18 million, respectively.
 Goodwill Indefinite-Lived Tradenames
 Domestic International Total Domestic International Total
Balances at February 2, 2013$528
 $
 $528
 $19
 $112
 $131
Sale of business(1)
(103) 
 (103) 
 (22) (22)
Impairments
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Balances at February 1, 2014425
 
 425
 19
 82
 101
Sale of business(2)

 
 
 

 (37) (37)
Impairments
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 (6) (6)
Balances at January 31, 2015425
 
 425
 18
 39
 57
Canada brand restructuring (3)

 
 
 
 (40) (40)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 
 
 
 1
 1
Balances at January 30, 2016$425
 $
 $425
 $18
 $
 $18
(1)Represents goodwill written off as a result of the sale of mindSHIFT in fiscal 2014 and indefinite-lived tradenames written off as a result of the sale of Best Buy Europe in fiscal 2014.
(2)Primarily represents the Five Star indefinite-lived tradenames classified as held for sale at January 31, 2015.
(3)
Represents the Future Shop tradename impaired as a result of the Canada brand restructuring in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. See Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for further discussion.

The following table provides the gross carrying amount of goodwill and cumulative goodwill impairment losses ($ in millions):
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Cumulative
Impairment
 
Gross Carrying
Amount(1)
 
Cumulative
Impairment(1)
Goodwill$1,100
 $(675) $1,100
 $(675)
 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Cumulative
Impairment
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Cumulative
Impairment
Goodwill$1,100
 $(675) $1,100
 $(675)
(1)Excludes the gross carrying amount and cumulative impairment related to Five Star, which was held for sale at the end of fiscal 2015. The sale of Five Star was completed on February 13, 2015.

Insurance

We are self-insured for certain losses related to health, workers' compensation and general liability claims; however, we obtain third-party insurance coverage to limit our exposure to thesecertain claims. A portionSome of these self-insured losses are managed through a wholly-owned insurance captive. We estimate our self-insured liabilities using a number of factors, including historical claims experience, an estimate of incurred but not reported claims, demographic and severity factors and valuations provided by independent third-party actuaries. Our self-insured liabilities included in theour Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows ($ in millions):
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Accrued liabilities$62
 $60
$67
 $65
Long-term liabilities54
 53
64
 63
Total$116
 $113
$131
 $128

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. We

65

Table of Contents

record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.

In determining our provision for income taxes, we use an annual effective income tax rate based on annual income, permanent differences between book and tax income and statutory income tax rates. The effective income tax rate also reflects our assessment of the ultimate outcome of tax audits. We adjust our annual effective income tax rate as additional information on outcomes or events becomes available. Discrete events, such as audit settlements or changes in tax laws, are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Our income tax returns are periodically audited by U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax authorities. At any one time, multiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the tax benefitsexposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we may record a tax benefitliability for uncertain tax positions using the highest cumulative tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized.such exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for

65

Table of Contents

which we have established a liability, is audited and effectively settled.fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and income tax provisions in the period in which we determine the issuean uncertain tax position is effectively settled, with the tax authorities, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. We include our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued penalties and interest, in accruedAccrued income taxes and long-termLong-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and in incomeIncome tax expense inon our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

Accrued Liabilities

The major components of accrued liabilities at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, were state and local tax liabilities, rent-relatedadvertising accruals, loyalty program liabilities, including accrued real estate taxes, loyalty programrent-related liabilities and self-insurance reserves.

Long-Term Liabilities

The major components of long-term liabilities at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, were unrecognized tax benefits, income tax liabilities, rent-related liabilities, self-insurance reserves, deferred compensation plan liabilities self-insurance reserves and deferred revenue.revenue from service contracts.

Foreign Currency

Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at our consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet date. For operations reported on a one-month lag, we use the exchange rates in effect one month prior to our consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet date. Results of operations and cash flows are translated using the average exchange rates throughout the period. The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of assets and liabilities is included as a component of shareholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, which are included in SG&A, have not been significant in any of the periods presented.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when the sales price is fixed or determinable, collection is reasonably assured and the customer takes possession of the merchandise, or in the case of services, the service has been provided. Revenue excludes sales taxes collected. Revenue from merchandise sales and services is reported net of sales returns, which includes an estimate of future returns based on historical return rates, with a corresponding reduction to cost of sales. Our sales returns reserve, which represents the estimated gross margin impact of returns, was $25$23 million and $25$28 million at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively.

For revenue transactions that involve multiple deliverables, we defer the revenue associated with any undelivered elements. The amount of revenue deferred in connection with the undelivered elements is determined using the relative fair value of each element, which is generally based on each element's relative retail price.element.
Our deferred revenues primarily relate to merchandise not yet delivered to customers, services not yet completed and technical support contracts not yet completed. At January 30, 2016, short-termShort-term deferred revenue was $357 million. At January 31, 2015, short-term deferred revenue was $376$453 million and $418 million as of which $50 million is included in current liabilities held for sale in relation to the sale of Five Star. At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively. At February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017, deferred revenue included within long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets was $45$22 million and $49$34 million, respectively.

Merchandise revenue

66

Table of Contents

Revenue is recognized for store sales when the customer receives and pays for merchandise. In the case of items paid for in store but subsequently delivered to the customer, revenue is recognized once delivery has been completed.
For transactions initiated online, customers choose whether to collect merchandise from one of our stores (“in-store pick up”) or have it delivered to them (typically using third partythird-party parcel delivery companies). For in-store pick up, we recognize revenue once the customer has taken possession of merchandise. For items delivered directly to the customer, we recognize revenue when delivery has been completed. Any fees charged to customers for delivery are also recognized when delivery has been completed.

66

Table of Contents

Services
Revenue related to consultation, design, installation, set-up, repair and educational classes are recognized once the service is complete. We sell various protection plans with extended warranty coverage for merchandise and technical support to assist customers in using their devices. Such plans have terms typically ranging from one month to five years. For extended warranty protection, third party insurersthird-party underwriters assume allthe risk associated with the coverage and are deemed to be the legal obligor. We record the net commissions we receive (the amount charged to the customer less the amountpremiums remitted to the insurer)underwriter) as revenue when the corresponding merchandise revenue is recognized. In addition, we are eligible to receive profit-sharing payments, which are dependent upon the performance of the portfolio. We record such profit-share as revenue once the portfolio period to which it relates is complete and we have sufficient evidence to estimate the amount. Service and commission revenues earned from the sale of extended warranties represented 2.0%, 2.2% and 2.3% of revenue in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These percentages include $68 million, $133 million and $158 million in fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of profit-share revenue.
For technical support contracts, we assume responsibility for fulfilling the support to customers and we recognize the associated revenue either on a straight-line basis over the life of the contracts, or if sufficient history is available, on a consumptionusage basis.
Credit card revenue
We offer promotional financing and credit cards issued by third-party banks that manage and directly extend credit to our customers. The banks are the sole owners of the accounts receivable generated under the program and accordingly, we do not hold any consumer receivables related to these programs. We are eligible to receive a profit shareprofit-share from our banking partners based on the performance of the programs. We record such profit shareprofit-share as revenue once the portfolio period to which it relates is complete, and we have sufficient evidence to estimate the amount.
Gift cards
We sell gift cards to our customers in our retail stores, online and through select third parties. We do not charge administrative fees on unused gift cards and our gift cards do not have an expiration date. We recognize revenue from gift cards when: (i)when the gift card is redeemed by the customer, or (ii)customer. For unredeemed gift cards, we recognize breakage when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is deemed remote, ("gift card breakage"), and we determine that we do not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift cards to thea relevant jurisdictions.jurisdiction ("gift card breakage"). We determine our gift cardthe breakage rate based uponon historical redemption patterns. Based on our historical information, the likelihood of a gift card remaining unredeemed can be determinedpatterns and record projected breakage 24 months after the gift card is issued. Gift card breakage income is included in revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.revenue. Gift card breakage income was $65$40 million, $19$37 million and $53$46 million in fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

Sales Incentives
We frequently offer sales incentives that entitle our customers to receive a gift card at the time of purchase or a reduction in the price of a product or service either at the point of sale or by submitting a claim for a refund (for example, coupons, rebates, etc.). For sales incentives issued to the customer in conjunction with a sale of merchandise or services, the reduction in revenue is recognized at the time of sale, based on the expected retail value of the incentive expected to be redeemed.
Customer Loyalty Programs
We have customer loyalty programs which allow members to earn points for each qualifying purchase.purchase completed with us or when using our co-branded credit cards. Points earned enable members to receive a certificate that may be redeemed on future purchases at our Best Buy branded stores. Depending on the customer's membership level within our loyalty program, certificatescertificate expirations typically range from 2 to 12 months from the date of issuance. The retail value of points earned by our loyalty program members is included in accrued liabilities and recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time the points are earned, based on the percentagevalue of points that are projected to be redeemed.
We recognize revenue when: (i)(1) a certificate is redeemed by the customer; (ii)(2) a certificate expires,expires; or (iii)(3) the likelihood of a certificate being redeemed by a customer is remotelow ("certificate breakage"). We determine our certificate breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns.

67

Table of Contents

Cost of Goods Sold and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table illustrates the primary costs classified in each major expense category:
Cost of Goods Sold
 Total costCost of products sold, including:
   Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from our vendors to our distribution centers;
   Vendor allowances that are not a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs; and
   Cash discounts on payments to merchandise vendors;
 Cost of services provided, including:
   Payroll and benefitsbenefit costs for services employees; and
   Cost of replacement parts and related freight expenses;
 Physical inventory losses;
 Markdowns;
 Customer shipping and handling expenses;
 Costs associated with operating our distribution network, including payroll and benefit costs, occupancy costs and depreciation; and
 Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from our distribution centers to our retail stores.
SG&A
 Payroll and benefit costs for retail and corporate employees;
 Occupancy and maintenance costs of retail, services and corporate facilities;
 Depreciation and amortization related to retail, services and corporate assets;
 Advertising costs;
 Vendor allowances that are a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs to promote a vendor's products;costs;
 Tender costs, including bank charges and costs associated with credit and debit card interchange fees;
 Charitable contributions;
 Outside and outsourced service fees;
 Long-lived asset impairment charges; and
 Other administrative costs, such as supplies, travel and lodging.

Vendor Allowances

We receive allowances from certain vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements intended to offset our costs of promoting and selling merchandise inventories. Vendor allowances are primarily in the form of receipt-based funds or sell-through credits. Receipt-based funds are generally determined at an agreed percentage of purchasesthe purchase price and are initially deferred and recorded as a reduction of merchandise inventories. The deferred amounts are then included as a reduction of cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. Sell-through credits are generally determined atcalculated using an agreed percentage of salesupon amount for each unit sold and are recognized when the related product is sold. Vendor allowances provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs, such as specialized store labor or training costs, are included in SG&A as an expense reduction when the cost is incurred.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs, which are included in SG&A, are expensed the first timewhen the advertisement runs.is customer-facing. Advertising costs consist primarily of digital, print and television advertisements, as well as promotional events. Advertising expenses were $742$776 million, $711$743 million and $757$742 million in fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We apply the fair value recognition provisions of accounting guidance as they relate to our stock-based compensation, which requirerequires us to recognize expense for the fair value of our stock-based compensation awards. We recognize compensationCompensation expense is recognized over the period in which services are required. It is recognized on a straight-line basis, except where there are

68

Table of Contents

expenseperformance awards that vest on a straight-linegraded basis overin which case the requisite service period of the award (or to an employee's eligible retirement date, if earlier).expense for these awards is front-loaded, or recognized on a graded attribution basis.

2.  Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations comprise the following:

Domestic Segment

During the fourth quarterare primarily comprised of fiscal 2014, we completed the sale of mindSHIFT to Ricoh Americas Corporation, at which time we recorded an $18 million pre-tax loss.

International Segment

Jiangsu Five Star - Appliance Co., Limited ("Five Star") within our International segment. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our Five Star business to Yingtan City Xiangyuan Investment Limited Partnership and Zhejiang Jiayuan Real Estate Group Co. On February 13, 2015, we completed the sale of Five Star and recognized a gain on sale of $99 million. Following the sale of Five Star, we continuecontinued to hold as available-for-sale one retail property in Shanghai, China, which remains held for sale at January 30, 2016, as we continue to actively market the property.China. The assets of this property arewere classified as held for sale in theheld-for-sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and were $31 million as of January 30, 2016. The presentation of discontinued operations has been retrospectively applied to all prior periods presented.

The composition of assets and liabilities disposed of as a result of the sale of Five Star was as follows ($ in millions):
 February 13, 2015
Cash and cash equivalents$125
Receivables113
Merchandise inventories252
All other assets461
Total assets$951
  
Accounts payable$478
All other liabilities128
Total liabilities$606

Best Buy Europe – During the second quarter of fiscal 2014,In May 2016, we completed the sale of our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe to CPW in return for the following consideration upon closing:property and recognized a gain, net cash of £341 million ($526 million); £80 million ($123 million)income tax, of ordinary shares of CPW; £25 million ($39 million), plus 2.5% interest, to be paid by CPW$16 million. The gain on June 26, 2014; and £25 million ($39 million), plus 2.5% interest, to be paid by CPW on June 26, 2015. We subsequently sold the ordinary shares of CPW for $123 million on July 3, 2013. We received the first such deferred cash payment on June 26, 2014 and the second deferred cash payment on June 26, 2015.

In conjunction with our agreement to sell our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe, we entered into a deal-contingent foreign currency forward contract to hedge £455 millionsale of the total £471 million ofproperty is included in Other, net proceeds. The contract was settled in cash following the completion of the sale on June 26, 2013, and we recognized a $2 million loss in gain (loss) from discontinued operationswithin Operating activities on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings in fiscal 2014.Cash Flows.


69

Table of Contents

The aggregate financial results of all discontinued operations for fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 were as follows ($ in millions):
 2016 2015 2014
Revenue$217
 $1,564
 $4,615
Restructuring charges(1)
1
 18
 110
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax benefit (expense)(2)
(8) (12) (235)
Income tax benefit (expense)(3)
(1) 
 31
Gain on sale of discontinued operations(4)
99
 1
 32
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests90
 (11) (172)
Net (earnings) loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
 (2) 9
Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders$90
 $(13) $(163)
 2018 2017 2016
Revenue$
 $
 $217
Restructuring charges(1)

 
 1
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations before income tax expense1
 28
 (8)
Income tax expense
 (7) (1)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
 
 99
Net earnings from discontinued operations$1
 $21
 $90
(1)
See Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for further discussion of the restructuring charges associated with discontinued operations.
(2)Includes a $175 million impairment to write down the book value of our investment in Best Buy Europe to fair value in fiscal 2014.
(3)Income tax benefit for fiscal 2014 includes a $27 million benefit related to a tax allocation between continuing and discontinued operations and a $15 million benefit related to the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe. The fiscal 2014 effective tax rate for discontinued operations differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the previously mentioned tax allocation, sale of mindSHIFT, restructuring charges and the impairment of our investment in Best Buy Europe. The sale of mindSHIFT, restructuring charges and impairment generally included no related tax benefit. The deferred tax assets related to the sale of mindSHIFT and restructuring charges generally resulted in an increase in the valuation allowance in an equal amount, of which the investment impairment is not tax deductible.
(4)Gain in fiscal 2014 is primarily comprised of the following: $28 million gain (with no tax impact) from sale of Best Buy Europe fixed-line business in Switzerland in the first quarter; $24 million gain (with no tax impact) from the sale of Best Buy Europe in the second quarter; and loss of $18 million from sale of mindSHIFT in the fourth quarter. Gain in fiscal 2016 of $99 million is from sale of Five Star in the first quarter.

3.   Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, we use a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:

Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets;
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.

Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management's estimates of market participant assumptions.

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.


7069

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, according to the valuation techniques we used to determine their fair values ($ in millions):
  Fair Value at  Fair Value at
Fair Value Hierarchy January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015Fair Value Hierarchy February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Assets          
Cash and cash equivalents          
Money market fundsLevel 1 $51
 $265
Level 1 $21
 $290
Corporate bondsLevel 2 
 13
Commercial paperLevel 2 265
 165
Level 2 90
 
Time depositsLevel 2 306
 100
Level 2 65
 15
Short-term investments          
Corporate bondsLevel 2 193
 276
Commercial paperLevel 2 122
 306
Level 2 474
 349
Time depositsLevel 2 990
 874
Level 2 1,558
 1,332
Other current assets        
Money market fundsLevel 1 3
 7
Commercial paperLevel 2 60
 60
Foreign currency derivative instrumentsLevel 2 18
 30
Level 2 2
 2
Time depositsLevel 2 79
 83
Level 2 101
 100
Other assets          
Interest rate swap derivative instrumentsLevel 2 25
 1
Level 2 
 13
Auction rate securitiesLevel 3 2
 2
Marketable securities that fund deferred compensationLevel 1 96
 97
Level 1 99
 96
Assets held for sale    
Cash and cash equivalents    
Money market fundsLevel 1 
 16
Time depositsLevel 2 
 124
Liabilities        
Accrued Liabilities    
Accrued liabilities    
Interest rate swap derivative instrumentsLevel 2 1
 
Foreign currency derivative instrumentsLevel 2 1
 
Level 2 8
 3
Long-term liabilities    
Interest rate swap derivative instrumentsLevel 2 4
 

There were no transfers between levels during the periods presented. During fiscal 20162017, our remaining investments in auction rate securities ("ARS"), which were classified as Level 3, were called at par, which resulted in proceeds of $2 million and 2015. In addition, there were no changes in the beginningrealized gain or loss. As of February 3, 2018, and ending balances ofJanuary 28, 2017, we had no items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the table above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for fiscal 2016 and 2015..

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Money Market Funds.market funds. Our money market fund investments wereare measured at fair value as they trade in an active market using quoted market prices and, therefore, are classified as Level 1.

Corporate Bonds. Our corporate bond investments were measured at fair value using quoted market prices. They were classified as Level 2 as they trade in a non-active market for which bond prices are readily available.
Commercial Paper.paper. Our investments in commercial paper wereare measured using inputs based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and, therefore, wereare classified as Level 2.

Time Deposits.deposits. Our time deposits are balances held with banking institutions that cannot be withdrawn for specified terms without a penalty. Time deposits are held at face value plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are classified as Level 2.


71

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Derivative Instruments.currency derivative instruments. Comprised primarily of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency swap contracts, our foreign currency derivative instruments wereare measured at fair value using readily observable market inputs, such as quotations on forward foreign exchange points and foreign interest rates. Our foreign currency derivative instruments wereare classified as Level 2, as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market.markets.


70

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Instruments.rate swap derivative instruments. Our interest rate swap contracts wereare measured at fair value using readily observable inputs, such as the LIBOR interest rate. Our interest rate swap derivative instruments wereare classified as Level 2, as these instruments are custom, over-the-counter contracts with various bank counterparties that are not traded in an active market.markets.
Auction Rate Securities. Our investments in auction rate securities ("ARS") were classified as Level 3 as quoted prices were unavailable. Due to limited market information, we utilized a DCF model to derive an estimate of fair value. The assumptions we used in preparing the DCF model include estimates with respect to the amount and timing of future interest and principal payments, forward projections of the interest rate benchmarks, the probability of full repayment of the principal considering the credit quality and guarantees in place, and the rate of return required by investors to own such securities given the current liquidity risk associated with ARS.

Marketable Securitiessecurities that Fund Deferred Compensation.fund deferred compensation. The assets that fund our deferred compensation consist of investments in mutual funds. These investments wereare classified as Level 1 as the shares of these mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis relate primarily to our tangible fixed assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are remeasured when the derived fair value is below carrying value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these assets, we do not periodically adjust carrying value to fair value, except in the event of impairment. When we determine that impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to fair value and the difference is recorded within operating income inSelling, general and administrative expenses and Restructuring charges on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.Earnings for non-restructuring and restructuring charges, respectively.

There were no fair value remeasurements related to discontinued operations recorded in fiscal 2018 and 2017. The following table summarizes the fair value remeasurements for non-restructuring property and equipment impairments and restructuring activitiesrelated to continuing operations recorded in fiscal 20162018 and 20152017 ($ in millions):
 2016 2015
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value(1)
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value (1)
Continuing operations       
Property and equipment (non-restructuring)$61
 $15
 $42
 $19
Restructuring activities(2)
       
Property and equipment30
 
 1
 
Tradename40
 
 
 
Total$131
 $15
 $43
 $19
Discontinued operations(3)
       
Property and equipment$
 $
 $1
 $
Total$
 $
 $1
 $
 2018 2017
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value(1)
 Impairments 
Remaining Net
Carrying Value (1)
Property and equipment (non-restructuring)$9
 $
 $28
 $
Property and equipment (restructuring)(2)
1
 
 8
 
Total$10
 $
 $36
 $
(1)Remaining net carrying value approximates fair value. Because assets subject to long-lived asset impairment are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, certain fair value measurements presented in the table may reflect values at earlier measurement dates and may no longer represent the fair values at February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017.
(2)
See Note 4, Restructuring Charges, for additional information.
(3)Property and equipment and tradename impairments associated with discontinued operations are recorded within loss from discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

All of the fair value remeasurements included in the table above were based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Fixed asset fair values were derived using a DCFdiscounted cash flow ("DCF") model to estimate the present value of net cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. The key inputs to the DCF model generally included our forecasts of net cash generated from revenue, expenses and other significant cash outflows, such as capital expenditures, as well as an appropriate discount rate. In the case of

72

Table of Contents

assets for which the impairment was the result of restructuring activities, no future cash flows have been assumed as the assets will cease to be used and expected sale values are nominal.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosures above, include cash, receivables, short-term investments, other investments, accounts payable, other payables and long-term debt. The fair values of cash, receivables, short-term investments, accounts payable and other payables approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. If these instruments were measured at fair value in the financial statements, they would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Short-term investments other than those disclosed in the tables above represent time deposits. Fair values for other investments held at cost are not readily available, but we estimate that the carrying values for these investments approximate fair value. See Note 5, Debt, for information about the fair value of our long-term debt.


71

Table of Contents

4.   Restructuring Charges
 
Summary
 
Restructuring charges incurred in fiscal 20162018, 20152017, and 20142016 were as follows ($ in millions):
 2016 2015 2014
Continuing operations     
Canadian brand consolidation$200
 $
 $
Renew Blue(2) 11
 155
Other restructuring activities(1)
3
 (6) (6)
Total continuing operations201
 5
 149
Discontinued operations     
Renew Blue
 18
 10
Other restructuring activities(2)

 
 100
Total$201
 $23
 $259
 2018 2017 2016
Continuing operations     
Best Buy Mobile$9
 $
 $
Renew Blue Phase 2
 26
 
Canadian brand consolidation(2) 3
 200
Renew Blue(1)
3
 5
 (2)
Other restructuring activities(2)

 5
 3
Total$10
 $39
 $201
(1)
(1)
Represents activity related to our remaining termination benefits and vacant space liabilities, primarily in our International segment, for our Renew Blue restructuring program, which began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. Charges related to the Domestic segment were $0 million, $0 million and a benefit of $1 million for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively; and to the International segment were $3 million, $5 million and a benefit of $1 million for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of February 3, 2018, the termination benefits liability was $0 million and the remaining vacant space liability was $11 million. We may continue to incur immaterial adjustments to the vacant space liability for changes in sublease assumptions or potential lease buyouts. In addition, lease payments for vacated stores will continue until leases expire or are terminated.
(2)Represents activity related to our remaining vacant space liability for U.S. large-format store closures in fiscal 2013. We may continue to incur immaterial adjustments to the liability for changes in sublease assumptions or potential lease buyouts. In addition, lease payments for vacated stores will continue until leases expire or are terminated. The remaining vacant space liability was $4 million at February 3, 2018.

Best Buy Mobile

On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to close all of our 257 remaining Best Buy Mobile stand-alone stores in the U.S. This decision was a result of changing economics in the mobile industry since we began opening these stores in 2006, along with the integration of our mobile model into our core stores and on-line channel, which are today more economically compelling. We expect to incur total pre-tax restructuring charges between $55 million and $65 million, primarily related to the termination of store leases that will be paid in fiscal 2019. In fiscal 2018, we incurred $9 million of restructuring charges related to implementing these changes, which consisted of $8 million of employee termination benefits and $1 million of property and equipment impairments. All restructuring charges related to this plan are from continuing operations and are presented in Restructuring charges on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

As of February 3, 2018, the termination benefits liability was $8 million as there were no cash payments or adjustments during fiscal 2018, and the vacant space liability was $18 million at January 30, 2016.$0 million.

(2) Activity primarily relatesRenew Blue Phase 2

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we took several strategic actions to our fiscal 2013 Best Buy Europe restructuring program, which is included in discontinued operations due to the saleeliminate and simplify certain components of our 50% ownership interest in Best Buy Europe inoperations and restructure certain field and corporate teams as part of our Renew Blue Phase 2 plan. In fiscal 2014. Restructuring2017, we incurred $26 million of restructuring charges related to implementing these changes, which primarily consistconsisted of employee termination benefits and property and equipment impairmentsimpairments. All restructuring charges related to this plan are from continuing operations and employeeare presented in Restructuring charges on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

No restructuring charges were incurred in fiscal 2018 related to Renew Blue Phase 2. The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred during fiscal 2017 for Renew Blue Phase 2 was as follows ($ in millions):
 
Domestic
2017
Property and equipment impairments$8
Termination benefits18
      Total Renew Blue Phase 2 restructuring charges$26


72


There was no activity in our restructuring accrual in fiscal 2018 related to Renew Blue Phase 2. The following table summarizes our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 2017 related to termination benefits.benefits as a result of Renew Blue Phase 2 ($ in millions):
Termination
Benefits
Balances at January 30, 2016$
Charges19
Cash payments(17)
Adjustments(2)
Balances at January 28, 2017$

Canadian Brand Consolidation

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we consolidated the Future Shop and Best Buy stores and websites in Canada under the Best Buy brand. This resulted in the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores and the conversion of the remaining 65 Future Shop stores to the Best Buy brand. In fiscal 2018, we recorded a benefit of $2 million related to adjustments to our vacant space liabilities outstanding due to changes in estimates related to sublease income. During fiscal 2017, we incurred $3 million of restructuring charges, which primarily consisted of lease exit costs. In fiscal 2016, we incurred $200 million of restructuring charges, related to implementing these changes, which primarily consisted of lease exit costs, a tradename impairment, property and equipment impairments, employee termination benefits and inventory write-downs. The inventory write-downs related to our Canadian brand consolidation are presented in restructuringRestructuring charges – cost of goods sold inon our Consolidated Statements of Earnings, and the remainder of the restructuring charges are presented in restructuringRestructuring charges inon our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.


73


The composition of total All restructuring charges we incurred for the Canadian brand consolidation in fiscal 2016 was as follows ($ in millions):
 International
Continuing operations 
Inventory write-downs$3
Property and equipment impairments30
Tradename impairment40
Termination benefits25
Facility closure and other costs102
Total continuing operations$200

The following tables summarize our restructuring accrual activity during the fiscal 2016, related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with Canadian brand consolidation ($ in millions):
 
Termination
Benefits
 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balances at January 31, 2015$
 $
 $
Charges28
 113
 141
Cash payments(24) (47) (71)
Adjustments(1)
(2) 5
 3
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 (7) (7)
Balances at January 30, 2016$2
 $64
 $66

(1) The adjustments related to termination benefits relate to higher-than-expected employee retention. Adjustments to facility closure and other costs represent changes in sublease assumptions.

Renew Blue
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we launched the Renew Blue strategy, which included initiatives intended to improve operating performance and reduce costs. These initiatives included focusing on core business activities, reducing headcount, updating our store operating model and optimizing our real estate portfolio. These cost reduction initiatives represented one of the key Renew Blue priorities. We incurred $2 million of favorable adjustments related to Renew Blue initiatives in fiscal 2016. Of the total adjustments, $1 million related to our Domestic segment, which consisted primarily of changes in retention assumptions used to estimate employee termination benefits. The remaining $1 million adjustment related to our International segment and consisted of facility closure and other costs. We expect to continue to implement cost reduction initiatives throughout fiscal 2017 as we further analyze our operations and strategies.
We incurred $29 million of charges related to Renew Blue initiatives during fiscal 2015. Of the total charges, $10 million related to our Domestic segment, which consisted primarily of employee termination benefits. The remaining $19 million of charges related to our International segment and consisted of employee termination benefits, property and equipment impairments and facility closure and other costs.

For continuing operations, the inventory write-downs related to our Renew Blue restructuring activities are presented in restructuring charges – cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings and the remainder of the restructuring charges are presented in restructuring charges. The restructuring charges from discontinued operations related to this plan are presented in discontinuedfrom continuing operations.


74


The composition of the restructuring charges we incurred for this program in fiscal 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, as well as the cumulative amount incurred through the end of fiscal 2016,2018, was as follows ($ in millions):
Domestic International TotalInternational
2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount 2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount 2016 2015 2014 Cumulative Amount2018 2017 2016 Cumulative Amount
Continuing operations                              
Inventory write-downs$
 $
 $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
$
 $
 $3
 $3
Property and equipment impairments
 
 7
 14
 
 1
 1
 25
 
 1
 8
 39

 
 30
 30
Tradename impairment
 
 40
 40
Termination benefits(2) 9
 106
 159
 
 5
 24
 38
 (2) 14
 130
 197

 
 25
 25
Investment impairments
 
 16
 43
 
 
 
 
 
 
 16
 43
Facility closure and other costs1
 1
 
 5
 (1) (5) 1
 50
 
 (4) 1
 55
(2) 3
 102
 103
Total continuing operations(1) 10
 129
 222
 (1) 1
 26
 113
 (2) 11
 155
 335
$(2) $3
 $200
 $201
Discontinued Operations                       
Property and equipment impairments
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 1
 
 
 1
 1
Termination benefits
 
 
 
 
 12
 4
 16
 
 12
 4
 16
Facility closure and other costs
 
 
 
 
 6
 5
 11
 
 6
 5
 11
Total discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 18
 10
 28
 
 18
 10
 28
Total$(1) $10
 $129
 $222
 $(1) $19
 $36
 $141
 $(2) $29
 $165
 $363


73

Table of Contents

The following table summarizestables summarize our restructuring accrual activity during fiscal 20162018, 2017 and 20152016, related to termination benefits and facility closure and other costs associated with this programas a result of Canadian brand consolidation ($ in millions):
Termination Benefits 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Termination
Benefits
 
Facility
Closure and
Other Costs
 Total
Balance at February 1, 2014$111
 $51
 $162
Balances at January 31, 2015$
 $
 $
Charges47
 16
 63
28
 113
 141
Cash payments(121) (22) (143)(24) (47) (71)
Adjustments(1)
(21) (14) (35)(2) 5
 3
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 (8) (8)
 (7) (7)
Balance at January 31, 201516
 23
 39
Balances at January 30, 20162
 64
 66
Charges
 
 

 1
 1
Cash payments(7) (9) (16)(2) (37) (39)
Adjustments(1)
(7) (5) (12)
 2
 2
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 1
 1

 4
 4
Balance at January 30, 2016$2
 $10
 $12
Balances at January 28, 2017
 34
 34
Charges
 
 
Cash payments
 (18) (18)
Adjustments(1)

 (2) (2)
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates
 1
 1
Balances at February 3, 2018$
 $15
 $15
(1)Adjustments related to termination benefits were duerelate to higher-than-expected employee retention. Adjustments related to facility closure and other costs represent changes in sublease assumptions and reductions in our remaining lease obligations.    assumptions.

5.   Debt

Short-Term Debt

U.S. Revolving Credit FacilitiesFacility

On June 30, 2014,27, 2016, we entered into a $1.25 billion five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility agreement (the "Five-Year Facility Agreement") with a syndicate of banks. The Five-Year Facility Agreement replaced the previous $1.5$1.25 billion senior

75


unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Previous Facility") with a syndicate of banks, which was originally scheduled to expire in October 2016,June 2019, but was terminated on June 30, 2014.27, 2016.

The interest rate under the Five-Year Facility Agreement is variable and is determined at our option as: (i) the sum of (a) the greatest of (1) JPMorgan'sJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s prime rate, (2) the greater of the federal funds rate and the overnight bank funding rate plus, in each case, 0.5%, and (3) the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), subject to certain adjustments plus 1.0%1%, and (b) a variable margin rate (the “ABR Margin”); or (ii) the LIBOR plus a variable margin rate (the “LIBOR Margin”). In addition, a facility fee is assessed on the commitment amount. The ABR Margin, LIBOR Margin and the facility fee are based upon the registrant'sour current senior unsecured debt rating. Under the Five-Year Facility Agreement, the ABR Margin ranges from 0.0%0.00% to 0.925%0.50%, the LIBOR Margin ranges from 1.000%0.90% to 1.925%,1.50% and the facility fee ranges from 0.125%0.10% to 0.325%0.25%. At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding and at January 30, 2016,outstanding. As of February 3, 2018, $1.25 billion was available under the Five-Year Facility Agreement.

The Five-Year Facility Agreement is guaranteed by specifiedcertain of our subsidiaries of Best Buy Co., Inc. and contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other things, these covenants restrict Best Buy Co., Inc. and certain of itsour subsidiaries' ability to incur certain types or amounts of indebtedness, incur liens on certain assets, make material changes in corporate structure or the nature of itsour business, dispose of material assets, engage in a change in control transaction, make certain foreign investments, enter into certain restrictive agreements or engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The Five-Year Facility Agreement also contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a maximum quarterly cash flow leverage ratio and a minimum quarterly interest coverage ratio (both ratios measured quarterly for the previous 12 months). The Five-Year Facility Agreement contains default provisions including, but not limited to, failure to pay interest or principal when due and failure to comply with covenants.


74


Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt consisted of the following ($ in millions):
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
2016 Notes$350
 $350
2018 Notes500
 500
$500
 $500
2021 Notes650
 650
650
 650
Interest rate swap valuation adjustments25
 1
(5) 13
Other debt
 1
Subtotal1,525
 1,502
1,145
 1,163
Debt discounts and issuance costs(7) (10)(3) (5)
Financing lease obligations178
 69
191
 177
Capital lease obligations38
 52
22
 30
Total long-term debt1,734
 1,613
1,355
 1,365
Less: current portion(395) (41)544
 44
Total long-term debt, less current portion$1,339
 $1,572
$811
 $1,321

2018 Notes

On July 16, 2013, we completed the sale of $500 million principal amount of notes due August 1, 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). The 2018 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.00% per year, payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on February 1, 2014. Net proceeds from the sale of the 2018 Notes were $495 million, after underwriting and issue discounts totaling $5 million.

We may redeem some or all of the 2018 Notes at any time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes to be redeemed, and (2) the sum of the present values of each remaining scheduled payment of principal and interest on the 2018 Notes to be redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points. Furthermore, if a change of control triggering event occurs, we will be required to offer to purchase the remaining unredeemed 2018 Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date.


76


The 2018 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The 2018 Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur debt secured by liens and enter into sale and lease-back transactions. As of February 3, 2018, the 2018 Notes are classified within our Current portion of long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

2016 and 2021 Notes

In March 2011, we issued $350$650 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2016 (the “2016 Notes”) and $650 million principal amount of notes due March 15, 2021 (the “2021 Notes” and, together with the 2016 Notes, the “Notes”). In March 2016, we repaid the 2016 Notes using existing cash resources. The 2016 Notes bore interest at a fixed rate of 3.75% per year, while the 2021 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% per year. Interest on the Notes isyear, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2011. The 2021 Notes were issued at a slight discount to par, which when coupled with underwriting discounts of $6$4 million,, resulted in net proceeds from the sale of the 2021 Notes of $990 million.$644 million.

We may redeem some or all of the 2021 Notes at any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount, and (ii) the sum of the present values of each remaining scheduled payment of principal and interest discounted to the redemption date on a semiannual basis, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to the redemption date as described in the indenture (including the supplemental indenture) relating to the 2021 Notes. Furthermore, if a change of control triggering event occurs, we will be required to offer to purchase the remaining unredeemed 2021 Notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date.

The 2021 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. The 2021 Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur debt secured by liens or to enter into sale and lease-back transactions.


75


Fair Value and Future Maturities

The fair value of long-term debt, excluding debt discounts and issuance costs and financing and capital lease obligations, approximated $1,543$1,199 million and $1,494$1,240 million at January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, respectively, based primarily on the quoted market prices, compared to carrying values of $1,525$1,145 million and $1,502$1,163 million at February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017, respectively. If our long-term debt was recorded at fair value, it would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, the future maturities of long-term debt, net of interest rate swaps and excluding debt discounts, and issuance costs and financing and capital lease obligations (see Note 8, Leases, for the future lease obligation maturities), consisted of the following ($ in millions):
Fiscal Year   
2017 $350
2018 
2019 517
$499
2020 

2021 

2022646
2023
Thereafter 658

Total long-term debt $1,525
$1,145

6.   Derivative Instruments

We manage our economic and transaction exposure to certain risks through the use of foreign currency derivative instruments and interest rate swaps. Our objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of net earnings, cash flows and net asset value associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We do not hold derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We have no derivatives that have credit risk-related contingent features and we mitigate our credit risk by engaging with financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings as our counterparties.

We record all derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at fair value and evaluate hedge effectiveness prospectively and retrospectively when electing to apply hedge accounting. We formally document all hedging relations at the inceptionsinception for derivative hedges and the underlying hedged items, as well as the risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, we have derivatives which are not designated as hedging instruments.

77



Net Investment Hedges

We use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against the effect of Canadian dollar exchange rate fluctuations on a portion of our net investment in our Canadian operations. The contracts have terms of up to 12 months. For a net investment hedge, we recognize changes in the fair value of the derivative as a component of foreign currency translation within other comprehensive income to offset a portion of the change in translated value of the net investment being hedged, until the investment is sold or liquidated. We limit recognition in net earnings of amounts previously recorded in other comprehensive income to circumstances such as complete or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. We report the ineffective portion of the gain or loss, if any, in net earnings.

Interest Rate Swaps

We use "receive fixed-rate, pay variable-rate" interest rate swaps to mitigate the effect of interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our 2018 Notes and 2021 Notes. Our interest rate swap contracts are considered perfect hedges because the critical terms and notional amounts match those of our fixed-rate debt being hedged and are therefore accounted as a fair value hedge using the shortcut method. Under the shortcut method, we recognize the change in the fair value of the derivatives with an offsetting change to the carrying value of the debt. Accordingly, there is no impact on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings from the fair value of the derivatives.


76


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

We use foreign currency forward contracts to manage the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relative to recognized receivable and payable balances denominated in non-functional currencies. The contracts generally have terms of up to 12 months. These derivative instruments are not designated in hedging relationships and, therefore, we record gains and losses on these contracts directly to net earnings.

Summary of Derivative Balances

The following table presents the gross fair values forof our outstanding derivative instruments and the corresponding classification at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015:28, 2017 ($ in millions):
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Contract TypeAssetsLiabilities AssetsLiabilitiesAssets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges(1)
$15
$1
 $19
$
$2
 $7
 $2
 $2
Derivatives designated as interest rate swaps(2)
25

 1


 5
 13
 
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)(1)
3

 11


 1
 
 1
Total$43
$1
 $31
$
$2
 $13
 $15
 $3
(1)The fair value is recorded in otherOther current assets or accrued liabilities.Accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)The fair value is recorded in otherOther assets or long-term liabilities.Long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the effects of derivative instruments by contract type on Other Comprehensive Incomeother comprehensive income ("OCI") and on our Consolidated Statements of Earnings for fiscal 2016fiscal 2018 and 20152017 ($ in millions):
 2016 2015
Contract TypePre-tax Gain(Loss) Recognized in OCI Gain(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Earnings (Effective Portion) Pre-tax Gain(Loss) Recognized in OCI Gain(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI to Earnings (Effective Portion)
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges$21
 $
 $22
 $


78


The following table presents the effects of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on our consolidated statements of earnings for fiscal 2016 and 2015:
Gain (Loss) Recognized within SG&A2018 2017
Contract Type2016 2015
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges   
Pre-tax loss recognized in OCI$(14) $(14)
Derivatives designated as interest rate swaps   
Gain (loss) recognized within interest expense   
Interest rate swap loss$(18) $(12)
Long-term debt gain18
 12
Net impact$
 $
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)$4
 $12
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)  
Loss recognized within selling, general and administrative expenses$(3) $(3)

The following table presents the notional amounts of our derivative instruments at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015:28, 2017 ($ in millions):
Notional AmountNotional Amount
Contract TypeJanuary 30, 2016 January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Derivatives designated as net investment hedges208
 197
$462
 $205
Derivatives designated as interest rate swaps750
 145
1,150
 750
No hedge designation (foreign exchange forward contracts)94
 212
33
 43
Total1,052
 554
$1,645
 $998

7.   Shareholders' Equity

Stock Compensation Plans

Our Best Buy Co., Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Plan") authorizes us to grant or issue non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other equity awards up to a total of 22.5 million shares. We have not granted incentive stock options under the Omnibus Plan. Under the terms of the Omnibus Plan, awards may be granted to our employees, officers, advisers, consultants and directors.

77


Awards issued under the Omnibus Plan vest as determined by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of our Board of Directors at the time of grant. Awards granted, forfeited or canceled under the previous plan, the 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, after February 1, 2014, adjust the amount available under the Omnibus Plan. At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, a total of 19.619.2 million shares were available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan.

Upon adoption and approval of the Omnibus Plan, all of our previous equity incentive compensation plans were terminated. However, existing awards under those plans continued to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule and will expire at the end of their original term.terms.

Our outstanding stock options have a 10-year term. Outstanding stock options issued to employees generally vest over a three or four-year period, and outstanding stock options issued to directors vest immediately upon grant.period. Share awards vest based either upon attainment of specified goals or solely upon continued employment.employment ("time-based"). Outstanding share awards that are not time-based vest at the end of a three-year incentive period based upon our total shareholder return ("TSR") compared to the TSR of companies that comprise Standard & Poor's 500 Index ("market-based") or upon the achievement of company performance goals ("performance-based"). We have time-based share awards that vest in their entirety at the end of three-year periods, time-based share awards that vest 33% on each of the three anniversary dates of the grant date, time-based share awards where 25% of the award vests on the date of grant and 25% vests on each of the three anniversary dates thereafter and time-based share awards to directors that vest one year from the grant date.

During fiscal 2014, ourOur Employee Stock Purchase Plan, was amended. The Planas amended, permits employees to purchase our common stock at a 5% discount from the market price at the end of semi-annual purchase periods and is non-compensatory. During fiscal 2013 (11-month), the Plan permitted our employees to purchase our common stock at a 15% discount from the market price of the stock at the beginning or at the end of a semi-annual purchase period, whichever is less, and was considered compensatory. Employees are required to hold the common stock purchased for 12 months. In fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 20140.1 million, 0.2 million, 0.3 million and 0.60.2 million shares, respectively, were purchased through our employee stock purchase plans. At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, plan participants had accumulated $23 million and $12 million, respectively, to purchase our common stock pursuant to these plans.this plan.

Stock-based compensation expense was as follows in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):

79


2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Stock options$15
 $17
 $25
$6
 $9
 $15
Share awards     
Share awards:     
Market-based16
 10
 9
19
 15
 16
Performance-based13
 6
 
Time-based73
 60
 62
91
 78
 73
Employee stock purchase plans
 
 1
Total$104
 $87
 $97
$129
 $108
 $104

Stock Options

Stock option activity was as follows in fiscal 20162018:
 
Stock
Options
 Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share 
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
Outstanding at January 31, 201517,342,000
 $36.81
    
Granted1,267,000
 $40.68
    
Exercised(1,432,000) $28.24
    
Forfeited/Canceled(2,935,000) $44.15
    
Outstanding at January 30, 201614,242,000
 $36.51
 4.7 $20
Vested or expected to vest at January 30, 201613,986,000
 $36.47
 4.6 $20
Exercisable at January 30, 201611,668,000
 $37.09
 3.8 $18
 
Stock
Options
 Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share 
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
Outstanding at January 28, 20176,987,000
 $36.61
    
Granted176,000
 $44.85
    
Exercised(3,931,000) $40.05
    
Forfeited/canceled(163,000) $43.50
    
Outstanding at February 3, 20183,069,000
 $32.32
 5.1 $119
Vested or expected to vest at February 3, 20183,069,000
 $32.32
 5.1 $119
Exercisable at February 3, 20182,434,000
 $30.40
 3.5 $99

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 was $11.5912.52, $9.098.04 and $7.7711.59, respectively, per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) exercised during fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016, was$57 million, $55 million and $14 million, $13 million and $39 million, respectively. At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, there was $15$2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.21.3 years.


78


Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $40156 million, $42164 million and $15840 million in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016, respectively.

There was $5$19 million, $519 million and $135 million of income tax benefits realized from stock option exercises in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016, respectively.

In fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016, we estimated the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using a lattice or Black Scholes valuation model (for certain individuals) with the following assumptions:
Valuation Assumptions(1)
 2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Risk-free interest rate(2)(1)
 0.1% – 2.1%
 0.1% – 2.4%
 0.1% – 1.8%
0.9% – 2.6%
 0.5% – 2.0%
 0.1% – 2.1%
Expected dividend yield 2.3% 2.5% 2.0%3.0% 3.5% 2.3%
Expected stock price volatility(3)(2)
 37% 40% 46%38% 37% 37%
Expected life of stock options (in years)(4)(3)
 6.0
 6.0
 5.9
6.0
 6.0
 6.0
(1)Forfeitures are estimated using historical experience and projected employee turnover.
(2)Based on the U.S. Treasury constant maturity interest rate whose term is consistent with the expected life of our stock options.
(3)(2)In projecting expected stock price volatility, we consider both the historical volatility of our stock price as well as implied volatilities from exchange-traded options on our stock.
(4)(3)We estimate the expected life of stock options based upon historical experience.

Market-Based Share Awards

The fair value of market-based share awards is determined using Monte-Carlo simulation. A summary of the status of our nonvested market-based share awards at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and changes during fiscal 20162018, iswere as follows:

80


Market-Based Share Awards Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per ShareShares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at January 31, 2015 1,704,000
 $24.16
Outstanding at January 28, 20171,552,000
 $32.99
Granted 758,000
 $31.48
564,000
 $42.40
Vested (914,000) $16.73
(640,000) $29.46
Forfeited/Canceled (86,000) $28.85
Outstanding at January 30, 2016 1,462,000
 $32.33
Forfeited/canceled(54,000) $35.81
Outstanding at February 3, 20181,422,000
 $36.35

At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, there was $19 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested market-based share awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.81.6 years.

Time-Based Share Awards

The fair value of time-based share awards is determined based on the closing market price of our stock on the date of grant. This value is reduced by the present value of expected dividends during vesting when the employee is not entitled to dividends.

A summary of the status of our nonvested time-based share awards at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and changes during fiscal 20162018, iswere as follows:
Time-Based Share Awards Shares Weighted-Average Fair Value per ShareShares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at January 31, 2015 5,543,000
 $24.40
Outstanding at January 28, 20175,365,000
 $31.57
Granted 2,683,000
 $38.72
2,326,000
 $43.52
Vested (2,503,000) $23.10
(2,242,000) $32.79
Forfeited/Canceled (620,000) $29.98
Outstanding at January 30, 2016 5,103,000
 $31.89
Forfeited/canceled(399,000) $36.07
Outstanding at February 3, 20185,050,000
 $36.17

At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, there was $8596 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested time-based share awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.


79


Performance-Based Share Awards

The fair value of performance-based share awards is determined based on the closing market price of our stock on the date of grant. This value is reduced by the present value of expected dividends during vesting when the employee is not entitled to dividends.

A summary of the status of our nonvested performance-based share awards at February 3, 2018, and changes during fiscal 2018, were as follows:
Performance-Based Share AwardsShares Weighted-Average Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at January 28, 2017438,000
 $28.98
Granted416,000
 $42.31
Vested(146,000) $28.98
Forfeited/canceled(23,000) $29.66
Outstanding at February 3, 2018685,000
 $37.04

At February 3, 2018, there was $14 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance-based share awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.

Earnings per Share

We compute our basic earnings per share based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, and our diluted earnings per share based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include stock options, nonvested share awards and shares issuable under our employee stock purchase plan. Nonvested market-based share awards and nonvested performance-based share awards are included in the average diluted shares outstanding each period if established market or performance criteria have been met at the end of the respective periods.

At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, options to purchase 14.23.1 million shares of common stock were outstanding as follows (shares in millions):
 Exercisable Unexercisable Total
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
In-the-money4.2
 36% $24.73
 1.3
 52% $27.45
 5.5
 39% $25.37
Out-of-the-money7.5
 64% $44.15
 1.2
 48% $40.51
 8.7
 61% $43.62
Total11.7
 100% $37.09
 2.5
 100% $33.87
 14.2
 100% $36.51
 Exercisable Unexercisable Total
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
 Shares % 
Weighted-
Average Price
per Share
In-the-money2.4
 100% $30.40
 0.7
 100% $39.71
 3.1
 100% $32.32

The computation of dilutive sharesAll outstanding excludes the out-of-the-money stock options because such outstanding options' exercise pricesat February 3, 2018, were greater thanin-the-money, as the average market price of our common shares and, therefore,was greater than the effect would be anti-dilutive (i.e., including such options would result in higher earnings per share).options' exercise prices.


81


The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($, and shares in millions, except per share amounts, and shares in millions)amounts):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Numerator (in millions):     
Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc., shareholders$807
 $1,246
 $695
Denominator (in millions):     
Numerator     
Net earnings from continuing operations$999
 $1,207
 $807
Denominator     
Weighted-average common shares outstanding346.5
 349.5
 342.1
300.4
 318.5
 346.5
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:          
Stock options and other4.2
 4.1
 5.5
6.7
 4.1
 4.2
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution350.7
 353.6
 347.6
307.1
 322.6
 350.7
Net earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders     
Net earnings per share from continuing operations     
Basic$2.33
 $3.57
 $2.03
$3.33
 $3.79
 $2.33
Diluted$2.30
 $3.53
 $2.00
$3.26
 $3.74
 $2.30

80


For fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, the number of potential shares that were not included in the computation of earnings per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive were 0 million, 4.5 million and 8.9 million, respectively.

Repurchase of Common Stock

In June 2011,February 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a $5.0new $5.0 billion share repurchase program.program that superseded the previous $5.0 billion authorization from June 2011. There is no expiration date governing the period over which we can repurchase shares under the June 2011 shareFebruary 2017 authorization. On March 1, 2018, we announced our intent to repurchase program.$1.5 billion of shares in fiscal 2019, which reflects an updated two-year plan of $3.5 billion compared to the original $3.0 billion two-year plan announced on March 1, 2017.

On January 22, 2016, we entered into a variable notional accelerated share repurchase agreement ("January 2016 ASR") with a third party financial institution to repurchase $150 million to $175 million of our common stock. Under the agreement, we paid $175 million at the beginning of the contract and received an initial delivery of 4.4 million shares on January 25, 2016. We retired these shares and recorded a $120 million reduction to stockholders' equity. As of January 30, 2016, the remaining $55 million was included as a reduction of stockholders'shareholders' equity in "Prepaid Share Repurchase". We accounted for the variable component of shares to be delivered under the ASR as a forward contract indexed toprepaid share repurchase on our common stock, which met all of the criteria for equity classification, and therefore, was not accounted for as a derivative instrument but instead was accounted for as a component of equity.Consolidated Balance Sheets. The ASR continued to meet the requirements for equity classification as of January 30, 2016.

The delivery of 4.4 million shares reduced our outstanding shares used to determine our weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share for the twelve months ended January 30, 2016. We evaluated the ASR agreement for potential dilutive effects of any shares remaining to be received or owed upon settlement and determined the additional shares to be received would be anti-dilutive, and therefore they were not included in our calculation of diluted earnings per share for the the twelve months ended January 30, 2016.

The2016 ASR was settled on February 17, 2016, for a final notional amount of $165 million. Accordingly we received 1.6 million shares, which were retired, and a $10 million cash payment from our counter-party equal to the difference between the $175 million up-front payment and the final notional amount. The cash received was included as Other, net within Financing activities on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The final notional amount was determined based upon the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the January 2016 ASR agreement. The number of shares delivered was based upon the final notional amount and the volume-weighted average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement, less an agreed-upon discount.


82


The following table presents information regarding the shares we repurchased and retired in fiscal 2016, noting that we had no repurchases2018, 2017 and retirements2016 ($ and shares in fiscal 2015 and 2014 ($,millions, except per share amounts, and shares in millions)amounts):
 20162018 2017 2016
Total cost of shares repurchased       
Open market $880
Open market(1)
$2,009
 $706
 $880
January 2016 ASR 120

 45
 120
Total $1,000
$2,009
 $751
 $1,000
       
Average price per share       
Open market $31.03
$57.16
 $36.11
 $31.03
January 2016 ASR $27.28
$
 $28.55
 $27.28
Average $30.53
$57.16
 $35.54
 $30.53
       
Number of shares repurchased and retired       
Open market 28.4
Open market(1)
35.1
 19.5 28.4
January 2016 ASR 4.4

 1.6 4.4
Total 32.8
35.1
 21.1 32.8
(1)
As of February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017, $13 million and $8 million, or 0.2 million and 0.1 million shares, in trades remained unsettled. The liability for unsettled trades is included in Accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

At January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, $3.0$3.0 billion remained of the $5.0 billion of share repurchases authorized by our Board in February 2017 was available for additional purchases underfuture share repurchases. Between the June 2011 share repurchase program.end of fiscal 2018 and March 29, 2018, we repurchased an incremental 3.5 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $249 million. Repurchased shares have been retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is computed as net earnings (loss) plus certain other items that are recorded directly to shareholders' equity. In addition to net earnings, (loss), the significant componentscomponent of comprehensive income (loss) includeincludes foreign currency

81


translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale marketable equity securities.adjustments. Foreign currency translation adjustments do not include a provision for income tax expense when earnings from foreign operations are considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. At this time, we are still evaluating the earnings that are indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. Refer to Note 10, Income Taxes, for additional information.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders for fiscal 20162018, 20152017, and 2014,2016, respectively ($ in millions):
 Foreign Currency Translation Available-For-Sale Investments Total
Balances at February 2, 2013$113
 $(1) $112
Foreign currency translation adjustments(136) 
 (136)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments
 7
 7
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings due to sale of business508
 
 508
Reclassification of losses on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 1
 1
Balances at February 1, 2014$485
 $7
 $492
Foreign currency translation adjustments(103) 
 (103)
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments
 (3) (3)
Reclassification of gains on available-for-sale investments into earnings
 (4) (4)
Balances at January 31, 2015$382
 $
 $382
Foreign currency translation adjustments(44) 
 (44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings(67) 
 (67)
Balances at January 30, 2016$271
 $
 $271

83


There is generally no tax impact related to foreign currency translation adjustments, as the earnings are considered permanently reinvested. In addition, there were no material tax impacts related to gains or losses on available-for-sale investments in the periods presented.
 Foreign Currency Translation
Balance at January 31, 2015$382
Foreign currency translation adjustments(44)
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings due to sale of business(67)
Balance at January 30, 2016271
Foreign currency translation adjustments10
Reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings due to sale of business(2)
Balance at January 28, 2017279
Foreign currency translation adjustments35
Balance at February 3, 2018$314

8.   Leases

The composition of net rent expense for all operating leases, including leases of property and equipment, was as follows in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Minimum rentals$797
 $848
 $864
$797
 $789
 $797
Contingent rentals1
 2
 2
1
 1
 1
Total rent expense798
 850
 866
798
 790
 798
Less: sublease income(15) (18) (18)(16) (16) (15)
Net rent expense$783
 $832
 $848
$782
 $774
 $783

The future minimum lease payments under our capital, financing and operating leases by fiscal year (not including contingent rentals) at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, were as follows ($ in millions):
Fiscal Year 
Capital
Leases
 
Financing
Leases
 
Operating
Leases(1)
Capital
Leases
 
Financing
Leases
 
Operating
Leases(1)
2017 $14
 $42
 $813
2018 9
 35
 708
2019 6
 29
 572
$7
 $47
 $791
2020 3
 23
 439
4
 43
 669
2021 2
 17
 310
3
 36
 533
20222
 28
 396
20232
 18
 257
Thereafter 12
 66
 521
9
 47
 400
Total minimum lease payments 46
 212
 $3,363
27
 219
 $3,046
Less amount representing interest (8) (34)  (5) (28)  
Present value of minimum lease payments 38
 178
  22
 191
  
Less current maturities (12) (33)  
(7) (39)  
Present value of minimum lease maturities, less current maturities $26
 $145
  
Present value of minimum lease payments, less current maturities$15
 $152
  
(1)
Operating lease obligations do not include payments to landlords covering real estate taxes and common area maintenance. These charges, if included, would increase total operating lease obligations by $1.1$0.9 billion at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018.


82


Total minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rent income of approximately $7269 million due under future noncancelable subleases.

9.  Benefit Plans

We sponsor retirement savings plans for employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Participants may choose from various investment options, including a fund comprised of our company stock. Participants can contribute up to 50% of their eligible compensation annually as defined by the plan document, subject to Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") limitations. We match 100% of the first 3% of participating employees' contributions and 50% of the next 2%. Employer contributions vest immediately. The total employer contributions were $5362 million, $6056 million and $6553 million in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016, respectively.

We have a non-qualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan for highly compensated employees and members of our Board of Directors. Amounts contributed and deferred under our deferred compensation plan are credited or charged with the performance of investment options offered under the plan and elected by the participants. In the event of bankruptcy, the assets of the plan are available to satisfy the claims of general creditors. The liability for compensation deferred under the plan was $3427 million and $4431 million at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, respectively, and is included in long-term liabilities.Long-term liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We manage the risk of changes in the fair value of the liability for deferred compensation by electing to match our liability under

84


the plan with investment vehicles that offset a substantial portion of our exposure. The fair value of the investment vehicles, which includes funding for future deferrals, was $9699 million and $9796 million at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 201528, 2017, respectively, and is included in other assets.Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

10.   Income Taxes

The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to income tax expense in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Federal income tax at the statutory rate$458
 $485
 $379
$613
 $635
 $458
State income taxes, net of federal benefit38
 43
 26
44
 38
 38
(Benefit) expense from foreign operations5
 (23) (23)(85) (46) 5
Other2
 (11) 6
(37) (18) 2
Legal entity reorganization
 (353) 
Tax Reform283
 
 
Income tax expense$503
 $141
 $388
$818
 $609
 $503
Effective income tax rate38.4% 10.1% 35.8%45.0% 33.5% 38.4%

Legal Entity ReorganizationTax Reform

InOn December 22, 2017, the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased CPW’s interest inU.S. enacted the Best Buy Mobile profit share agreement for $1.3 billion (the “Mobile buy-out”Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("tax reform" or “Tax Act”). The Mobile buy-out completed by our U.K. subsidiary resulted in the $1.3 billion purchase price being assigned, for, which significantly changed U.S. tax purposes only, to an intangible asset. The Mobile buy-out did not, however, result in a similar intangible asset inlaw. Among other things, the U.K., as the Mobile buy-out was considered part of a tax-free equity transaction for U.K. tax purposes.

BecauseTax Act lowered the U.S. statutory tax basis inrate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, broadened the intangible asset was considered underbase to which U.S. tax law to be held by our U.K. subsidiary, which was regarded as a foreign corporation for U.S. tax purposes, ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires that no deferred tax asset may be recorded in respect of the intangible asset. ASC 740-30-25-9 also precludes the recording of a deferred tax asset on the outside basis difference of the U.K. subsidiary. As a result, the amortization of the U.S. tax basis in the intangible asset only resulted in a periodic income tax benefit by reducing the amountapplies, imposed a one-time deemed repatriation tax on net unremitted earnings of the U.K. subsidiary’s income, if any, that would otherwise have beenforeign subsidiaries not previously subject to U.S. income taxes.tax and effectively created a new minimum tax on certain future foreign earnings.

In response to the first quarterTax Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) that provides guidance on accounting for the impact of the Tax Act. SAB 118 allows companies to record provisional amounts to the extent that they are reasonably estimable and adjust them over time as more information becomes available, not to extend beyond the measurement period of one year from the enactment of the Tax Act.

As a result of the Tax Act, we applied a blended U.S. statutory federal income tax rate of 33.7% for fiscal 2015,2018. In addition, we filed an electionrecorded provisional tax expense in fiscal 2018 of $283 million. The $283 million included a $209 million charge associated with the Internal Revenue Servicedeemed repatriation tax and a $74 million charge related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the new tax rate.

We previously considered substantially all of the earnings in our non-U.S. subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. and, accordingly, recorded no deferred income taxes on such earnings. At this time, and until we fully analyze the

83


applicable provisions of the Tax Act, our intention with respect to unremitted foreign earnings is to continue to indefinitely reinvest outside the U.S. those earnings needed for working capital or additional foreign investment. Apart from the deemed repatriation tax, any incremental deferred income taxes on the unremitted foreign earnings are not expected to be material.

We continue to analyze the impacts of the Tax Act for provisions that become effective in future years. One such provision is the Global Intangible Low Tax Income (“GILTI”), effectively, a new minimum tax on certain foreign earnings. Under U.S. GAAP, we can make an accounting policy election and either treat the U.K. subsidiarytaxes on GILTI as a disregarded entitycurrent period expense when incurred or factor such that its assets are now deemedamounts into the measurement of deferred taxes. Due to be assets held directly bythe complexity of these new rules, we have not completed the analysis of this provision; therefore, we have not made any adjustments in our fiscal 2018 financial statements nor have we made a U.S. entity for U.S. tax purposes. This tax-only election, which resulted inpolicy decision regarding the liquidationrecording of GILTI.

The actual impact of the U.K. subsidiary for U.S. tax purposes, resultedTax Act may differ materially from our provisional amounts due to further refinement of our calculations as allowed by SAB 118, changes in the eliminationinterpretations and assumptions we have made or actions we may take as a result of the Company’s outside basis difference inTax Act. The provisional amounts will be finalized within the U.K. subsidiary. Additionally,one-year measurement period, as we gather and analyze the election resulted in the recognition of a deferred tax asset (and corresponding income tax benefit)additional documentation necessary for the remaining unrecognized inside tax basis in the intangible, in a manner similar to a change in tax status as provided in ASC 740-10-25-32.calculations.

Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense by jurisdiction was as follows in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
United States$1,310
 $1,201
 $699
$1,480
 $1,507
 $1,310
Outside the United States
 186
 384
337
 309
 
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense$1,310
 $1,387
 $1,083
$1,817
 $1,816
 $1,310

85



Income tax expense was comprised of the following in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Current:          
Federal$347
 $354
 $305
$547
 $317
 $347
State48
 51
 46
59
 37
 48
Foreign60
 33
 55
50
 54
 60
455
 438
 406
656
 408
 455
Deferred:          
Federal65
 (275) (22)141
 163
 65
State10
 (26) 1
11
 21
 10
Foreign(27) 4
 3
10
 17
 (27)
48
 (297) (18)162
 201
 48
Income tax expense$503
 $141
 $388
$818
 $609
 $503


84


Deferred taxes are the result of differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the following ($ in millions):
January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017
Accrued property expenses$175
 $129
$52
 $91
Other accrued expenses78
 91
43
 76
Deferred revenue99
 93
69
 104
Compensation and benefits99
 103
32
 43
Stock-based compensation86
 94
32
 64
Goodwill and intangibles253
 287
102
 210
Loss and credit carryforwards133
 156
120
 123
Other86
 88
38
 59
Total deferred tax assets1,009
 1,041
488
 770
Valuation allowance(108) (143)(99) (94)
Total deferred tax assets after valuation allowance901
 898
389
 676
Property and equipment(296) (251)(163) (240)
Inventory(69) (54)(47) (97)
Other(26) (27)(20) (22)
Total deferred tax liabilities(391) (332)(230) (359)
Net deferred tax assets$510
 $566
$159
 $317

DeferredNet deferred tax assets and liabilitiesare included inon our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows ($ in millions):
 January 30, 2016 January 31, 2015
Other assets$510
 $574
Long-term liabilities held for sale
 (8)
Net deferred tax assets$510
 $566
Other assets as of February 3, 2018, and January 28, 2017.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we early adopted ASU 2015-17, which requires that all deferred taxes be presented as non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further information regarding this balance sheet reclassification.

At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, we had total net operating loss carryforwards from international operations of $96$81 million,, of which $89$76 million will expire in various years through 2036 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. Additionally, we had acquired

86


U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $19$9 million, which expire between 2023 and 2030,2030; U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $1$1 million, which expire between 2023 and 2026,2026; U.S. federal capital loss carryforwards of $2 million, which expire in 2023; state credit carryforwards of $13$11 million, which expire in 2024,between 2020 and 2028; state capital loss carryforwards of $4$6 million, which expire in 2019.2019; international credit carryforwards of $2 million, which have no expiration; and international capital loss carryforwards of $8 million, which have no expiration.

At January 30, 2016,February 3, 2018, a valuation allowance of $108$99 million had been established, of which $1$1 million is against U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards, $9carryforwards; $16 million is against international, U.S. federal and state capital loss carryforwards, $8carryforwards; $7 million is against state credit carryforwards and other state deferred tax assets,assets; and $90$75 million is against certain international net operating loss carryforwards and other international deferred tax assets. The $35$5 million decrease increase from January 31, 2015,28, 2017, is primarily due to the decrease incurrent year loss activity and the exchange rate impact on the valuation allowance against certain international net operating loss carryforwards.

We have not provided deferred taxes on unremitted earnings attributable to foreign operations that have been considered to be reinvested indefinitely. These earnings relate to ongoing operations and were $896 million at January 30, 2016. It is not practicable to determine the income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested.

The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of period$410
 $370
 $383
$374
 $469
 $410
Gross increases related to prior period tax positions30
 33
 38
19
 11
 30
Gross decreases related to prior period tax positions(13) (88) (67)(126) (144) (13)
Gross increases related to current period tax positions59
 114
 34
29
 55
 59
Settlements with taxing authorities(9) (9) (3)(12) (12) (9)
Lapse of statute of limitations(8) (10) (15)(5) (5) (8)
Balance at end of period$469
 $410
 $370
$279
 $374
 $469


85


Unrecognized tax benefits of $337$263 million,, $297 $346 million and $228$337 million at February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016,, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, respectively, would favorably impact our effective income tax rate if recognized.

We recognize interest and penalties (not included in the "unrecognized tax benefits" above), as well as interest received from favorable tax settlements, as components of income tax expense. Interest income of $10 million, interest income of $9 million and interest expense of $10$10 million was recognized in fiscal 20162018., 2017 and 2016, respectively. At February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016,, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, we had accrued interest of $89$42 million,, $78 $61 million and $91$89 million, respectively, along with accrued penalties of $0 million, $1 million $2 million and $2$1 million at February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016,, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, respectively.

We file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before fiscal 20052011.

Because existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for us for unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months, and since we are routinely under audit by various taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change during the next 12 months. An estimate of the amount or range of such change cannot be made at this time. However, we do not expect the change, if any, to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows within the next 12 months.

11.   Segment and Geographic Information

Segment Information

Our chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is our Chief Executive Officer. Our business is organized into two reportable segments: Domestic (which is comprised of all operations within the U.S. and its districts and territories) and International (which is comprised of all operations outside the U.S. and its districts and territories). Our CODM has ultimate responsibility for enterprise decisions. Our CODM determines, in particular, resource allocation for, and monitors the performance of, the consolidated enterprise, the Domestic segment and the International segment. The Domestic segment managersmanagement and International segment managersmanagement have responsibility for operating decisions, allocating resources and assessing performance

87


within their respective segments. Our CODM relies on internal management reporting that analyzes enterprise results to the net earnings level and segment results to the operating income level.

We aggregate our Canada and Mexico businesses into one International operating segment. Our Domestic and International operating segments also represent our reportable segments. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.


8886

Table of Contents

The following tables presenttable presents our business segment information in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Revenue          
Domestic$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
$38,662
 $36,248
 $36,365
International3,163
 4,284
 4,780
3,489
 3,155
 3,163
Total revenue$39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
$42,151
 $39,403
 $39,528
Percentage of revenue, by revenue category          
Domestic:     
Domestic     
Consumer Electronics32% 31% 30%33% 34% 32%
Computing and Mobile Phones46% 47% 48%45% 45% 46%
Entertainment8% 9% 8%8% 7% 8%
Appliances8% 7% 7%10% 9% 8%
Services5% 5% 6%4% 5% 5%
Other1% 1% 1%% % 1%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
International:     
International     
Consumer Electronics31% 30% 29%32% 31% 31%
Computing and Mobile Phones48% 49% 50%46% 48% 48%
Entertainment9% 9% 10%7% 7% 9%
Appliances5% 5% 5%8% 6% 5%
Services6% 6% 6%5% 7% 6%
Other1% 1% < 1%
2% 1% 1%
Total100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%
Operating income (loss)          
Domestic(1)$1,585
 $1,437
 $1,145
$1,752
 $1,764
 $1,585
International(210) 13
 (1)91
 90
 (210)
Total operating income1,375
 1,450
 1,144
1,843
 1,854
 1,375
Other income (expense)          
Gain on sale of investments2
 13
 20
1
 3
 2
Investment income and other13
 14
 19
48
 31
 13
Interest expense(80) (90) (100)(75) (72) (80)
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense$1,310
 $1,387
 $1,083
$1,817
 $1,816
 $1,310
Assets(2)
          
Domestic$12,318
 $12,987
 $11,123
$11,553
 $12,496
 $12,318
International1,201
 2,258
 2,867
1,496
 1,360
 1,201
Total assets$13,519
 $15,245
 $13,990
$13,049
 $13,856
 $13,519
Capital expenditures(2)
          
Domestic$602
 $519
 $440
$606
 $524
 $602
International47
 42
 107
82
 56
 47
Total capital expenditures$649
 $561
 $547
$688
 $580
 $649
Depreciation(2)
          
Domestic$613
 $575
 $565
$631
 $613
 $613
International44
 81
 136
52
 41
 44
Total depreciation$657
 $656
 $701
$683
 $654
 $657
(1)
For fiscal 2015The Domestic segment operating income includes certain operations that are based in foreign tax jurisdictions and 2014, assets are recastprimarily relate to present our retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-17 Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, ASU 2015-03 Simplifyingsourcing products into the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and ASU 2015-15 Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our credit facilities.
U.S.
(2)For fiscal 2015 and 2014, the International segment amounts for assets, capital expenditures and depreciation include amounts from Five Star.


8987

Table of Contents

Geographic Information

The following table presents our geographic information in fiscal 20162018, 20152017 and 20142016 ($ in millions):
2016 2015 20142018 2017 2016
Net sales to customers     
Revenue from external customers     
United States$36,365
 $36,055
 $35,831
$38,662
 $36,248
 $36,365
Canada2,917
 4,047
 4,522
3,187
 2,899
 2,917
Other246
 237
 258
302
 256
 246
Total revenue$39,528
 $40,339
 $40,611
Total revenue from external customers$42,151
 $39,403
 $39,528
Long-lived assets          
United States$2,189
 $2,100
 $2,190
$2,205
 $2,120
 $2,189
Canada140
 174
 244
190
 156
 140
China
 
 139
Other17
 21
 25
26
 17
 17
Total long-lived assets$2,346
 $2,295
 $2,598
$2,421
 $2,293
 $2,346

12.   Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings. Where appropriate, we have made accruals with respect to these matters, which are reflected in our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. However, there are cases where liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated and, therefore, accruals have not been made. We provide disclosure of matters where we believe it is reasonably possible the impact may be material to our consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Securities Actions
 
In February 2011, a purported class action lawsuit captioned, IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., was filed against us and certain of our executive officers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. This federal court action alleges, among other things, that we and the officers named in the complaint violated Sections 10(b) and 20A of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act in connection with press releases and other statements relating to our fiscal 2011 earnings guidance that had been made available to the public. Additionally, in March 2011, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Rene LeBlanc, against us and certain of our executive officers in the same court. In July 2011, after consolidation of the IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund and Rene LeBlanc actions, a consolidated complaint captioned, IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al., was filed and served. We filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint in September 2011, and in March 2012, subsequent to the end of fiscal 2012, the court issued a decision dismissing the action with prejudice. In April 2012, the plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or amend the court's decision on our motion to dismiss. In October 2012, the court granted plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the court's decision on our motion to dismiss in part by vacating such decision and giving plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, which plaintiff did in October 2012. We filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in November 2012 and all responsive pleadings were filed in December 2012. A hearing was held on April 26, 2013. On August 5, 2013, the court issued an order granting our motion to dismiss in part and, contrary to its March 2012 order, denying the motion to dismiss in part, holding that certain of the statements alleged to have been made were not forward-looking statements and therefore were not subject to the “safe-harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA).Act. Plaintiffs moved to certify the purported class. By Order filed August 6, 2014, the court certified a class of persons or entities who acquired Best Buy common stock between 10:00 a.m. EDT on September 14, 2010, and December 13, 2010, and who were damaged by the alleged violations of law. The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted our request for interlocutory appeal. Oral argument wasOn April 12, 2016, the 8th Circuit held in October 2015, and we await a decision. Thethe trial court has stayed proceedings whilemisapplied the appeallaw and reversed the class certification order. IBEW petitioned the 8th Circuit for a rehearing en banc, which was denied on June 1, 2016. In October 2016, IBEW advised the trial court it will not seek review by the Supreme Court. On June 23, 2017, the trial court denied plaintiff's request to file a new Motion for Class Certification. On October 30, 2017, plaintiffs filed with the trial court a motion for leave to file a second amended class action complaint which Best Buy opposed in a filing on November 6, 2017. That motion is pending. We continue to believe that thesethe remaining individual plaintiff's allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend our company in this matter.

88

Table of Contents

In June 2011, a purported shareholder derivative action captioned, Salvatore M. Talluto, Derivatively and on Behalf of Best Buy Co., Inc. v. Richard M. Schulze, et al., as Defendants and Best Buy Co., Inc. as Nominal Defendant, was filed against both present and former members of our Board of Directors serving during the relevant periods in fiscal 2011 and us as a nominal

90

Table of Contents

defendant in the U.S. District Court for the State of Minnesota. The lawsuit alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duty, among other claims, including violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, in failing to correct public misrepresentations and material misstatements and/or omissions regarding our fiscal 2011 earnings projections and, for certain directors, selling stock while in possession of material adverse non-public information. Additionally, in July 2011, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Daniel Himmel, against us and certain of our executive officers in the same court. In November 2011, the respective lawsuits of Salvatore M. Talluto and Daniel Himmel were consolidated into a new action captioned, In Re: Best Buy Co., Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, and a stay ordered pending the close of discovery in the consolidated IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. case. Additionally, in June 2015, a similar purported class action was filed by a single shareholder, Khuong Tran, derivatively on behalf of Best Buy Co., Inc. against us and certain of our executive officers and directors in the same court. The Khuong Tran lawsuit has also been stayed pending the close of discovery in IBEW.

The plaintiffs in the above securities actions seek damages, including interest, equitable relief and reimbursement of the costs and expenses they incurred in the lawsuits. As stated above, we believe the allegations in the above securities actions are without merit, and we intend to defend these actions vigorously. Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the claims in the above securities actions, their respective procedural litigation history and the degree to which we intend to defend our company in these matters, the amount or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, cannot be estimated.
Cathode Ray Tube Action

On November 14, 2011, we filed a lawsuit captioned In re Cathode Ray Tube Antitrust Litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We allege that the defendants engaged in price fixing in violation of antitrust regulations relating to cathode ray tubes for the time period between March 1, 1995 through November 25, 2007. No trial date has been set. In connection with this action, we received settlement proceeds net of legal expenses and costs in the amount of 
 $75 million during fiscal 2016. We will continue to litigate against the remaining defendants and expect that further settlement discussions will occur as this matter proceeds .

Other Legal Proceedings
 
We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of conducting business. For such legal proceedings, we have accrued an amount that reflects the aggregate liability deemed probable and estimable, but this amount is not material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Because of the preliminary nature of many of these proceedings, the difficulty in ascertaining the applicable facts relating to many of these proceedings, the variable treatment of claims made in many of these proceedings and the difficulty of predicting the settlement value of many of these proceedings, we are not able to estimate an amount or range of any reasonably possible additional losses. However, based upon our historical experience, the resolution of these proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Commitments

We engage Accenture LLP ("Accenture") to assist us with improving our operational capabilities and reducing our costs in the information systems and human resources areas. Our contract with Accenture ends during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and we expect the spending to total $95 million up to the end of the contract.

We had outstanding letters of credit and bankers' acceptances for purchase obligations with an aggregate fair value of $89$83 million at January 30, 2016.February 3, 2018.


91

Table of Contents

13.   SupplementaryQuarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables show selected operating results for each 3-month quarter and full year of fiscal 20162018 and 20152017 (unaudited) ($ in millions):
Quarter 12-MonthQuarter 12-Month
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 20161st 2nd 3rd 4th 2018
Revenue$8,558
 $8,528
 $8,819
 $13,623
 $39,528
$8,528
 $8,940
 $9,320
 $15,363
 $42,151
Comparable sales % change(1)
0.6 % 3.8% 0.8% (1.7)% 0.5 %1.6% 5.4% 4.4% 9.0% 5.6%
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(5)
(0.7)% 2.7% 0.5% (1.8)% (0.1)%
Gross profit$2,030
 $2,098
 $2,112
 $2,951
 $9,191
$2,022
 $2,153
 $2,280
 $3,421
 $9,876
Operating income(2)
86
 288
 230
 771
 1,375
300
 321
 350
 872
 1,843
Net earnings from continuing operations37
 164
 129
 477
 807
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax92
 
 (4) 2
 90
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests129
 164
 125
 479
 897
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders129
 164
 125
 479
 897
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(3)
         
Net earnings from continuing operations(3)
188
 209
 238
 364
 999
Gain from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1
 
 1
Net earnings$188
 $209
 $239
 $364
 $1,000
Diluted earnings per share(4)
         
Continuing operations$0.10
 $0.46
 $0.37
 $1.39
 $2.30
$0.60
 $0.67
 $0.78
 $1.23
 $3.26
Discontinued operations0.26
 
 (0.01) 0.01
 0.26

 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per share$0.36
 $0.46
 $0.36
 $1.40
 $2.56
$0.60
 $0.67
 $0.78
 $1.23
 $3.26

89

Table of Contents

 Quarter 12-Month
 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2015
Revenue$8,639
 $8,459
 $9,032
 $14,209
 $40,339
Comparable sales % gain (decline)(1)
(1.8)% (2.2)% 2.9% 2.0% 0.5%
Comparable sales % gain (decline), excluding estimated impact of installment billing(5)(6)
(1.8)% (2.2)% 2.2% 1.3% %
Gross profit$1,967
 $1,978
 $2,076
 $3,026
 $9,047
Operating income(4)
210
 225
 205
 810
 1,450
Net earnings from continuing operations469
 137
 116
 524
 1,246
Gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(8) 10
 (9) (4) (11)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests461
 147
 107
 520
 1,235
Net earnings attributable to Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders461
 146
 107
 519
 1,233
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(3)
         
Continuing operations$1.33
 $0.39
 $0.33
 $1.47
 $3.53
Discontinued operations(0.02) 0.03
 (0.03) (0.01) (0.04)
Diluted earnings per share$1.31
 $0.42
 $0.30
 $1.46
 $3.49
 Quarter 12-Month
 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2017
Revenue$8,443
 $8,533
 $8,945
 $13,482
 $39,403
Comparable sales % change(1)
(0.1)% 0.8% 1.8% (0.7)% 0.3%
Gross profit(5)
$2,145
 $2,062
 $2,203
 $3,030
 $9,440
Operating income(6)
372
 289
 312
 881
 1,854
Net earnings from continuing operations226
 182
 192
 607
 1,207
Gain from discontinued operations, net of tax3
 16
 2
 
 21
Net earnings$229
 $198
 $194
 $607
 $1,228
Diluted earnings per share(4)
         
Continuing operations$0.69
 $0.56
 $0.60
 $1.91
 $3.74
Discontinued operations0.01
 0.05
 0.01
 
 0.07
Diluted earnings per share$0.70
 $0.61
 $0.61
 $1.91
 $3.81
(1)
Our comparable sales calculation compares revenue from stores, websites and call centers operating for at least 14 full months, as well as revenue related to certain other comparable sales channels for a particular period to athe corresponding period in the prior year. Relocated stores, as well as remodeled, expanded and downsized stores closed more than 14 days, are excluded from our comparable sales calculation until at least 14 full months after reopening. Acquisitions are included in the comparable sales calculation beginning with the first full quarter following the first anniversary of the date of the acquisition. The portionCanadian brand consolidation, which included the permanent closure of 66 Future Shop stores, the conversion of 65 Future Shop stores to Best Buy stores and the elimination of the calculationFuture Shop website, had a material impact on a year-over-year basis on the remaining Canadian retail stores and the website. As such, from the first quarter of fiscal 2016 through the third quarter of fiscal 2017, all Canadian store and website revenue was removed from the comparable sales attributable to ourbase and the International segment excludes the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The calculation ofno longer had a comparable metric. Therefore, Consolidated comparable sales excludesequaled the impactDomestic segment comparable sales. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we resumed reporting International comparable sales as revenue from discontinued operations. Comparable onlinein the International segment was once again deemed to be comparable and, as such, Consolidated comparable sales are included in ouronce again equal to the aggregation of Domestic and International comparable sales calculation. The method of calculating comparable sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our method of calculating comparable sales may not be the same as other retailers' methods.
sales.
(2)
Includes $186$0 million,, $(4) $2 million,, $7 $(2) million and $12$10 million of restructuring charges (benefit) recorded in the fiscal first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, and $201$10 million for the 12 months ended January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, related to measures we took to restructure our businesses.
Also includes $80 million related to a one-time bonus for certain employees and $20 million related to a one-time contribution to the Best Buy Foundation in response to future tax savings created by the Tax Act for the fiscal fourth quarter and 12 months ended February 3, 2018.

92

Table of Contents

(3)Includes $283 million of charges resulting from the Tax Act for the fiscal fourth quarter and 12 months ended February 3, 2018, including $209 million associated with the deemed repatriation tax and $74 million primarily related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
(4)The sum of our quarterly diluted earnings per share does not equal our annual diluted earnings per share due to differences in quarterly and annual weighted-average shares outstanding.
(4)(5)
Includes $2$183 million $5of cathode ray tube ("CRT") litigation settlements reached and recorded in the fiscal first quarter and $183 million, $5 for the 12 months ended January 28, 2017, related to products purchased and sold in prior fiscal years.
(6)Includes $29 million, $0 million, $1 million and $(7)$9 million of restructuring charges recorded in the fiscal first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively, and $5$39 million for the 12 months ended January 31, 201528, 2017, related to measures we took to restructure our businesses.
(5)Represents comparable sales excluding the estimated revenue Also, includes $161 million of installment billing.
(6)Enterprise comparable sales for fiscal 2015 include revenue from continuing operationsCRT litigation settlements, net of related legal fees and costs, recorded in the International segment. Excluding the International segment, Enterprise comparable sales, excluding the impact of installment billing, would have been (1.3%)fiscal first quarter and in the first quarter, 2.0%12 months ended January 28, 2017, related to products purchased and sold in the second quarter, 2.4% in the third quarter, 0.5% in the fourth quarter and 0.5% forprior fiscal 2015, or equal to Domestic comparable sales excluding the impact of installment billing, for the same periods.years.


9390

Table of Contents



Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We have established a Disclosure Committee, consisting of certain members of management, to assist in this evaluation. Our Disclosure Committee meets on a quarterly basis and more often if necessary.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management's report on our internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The attestation report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal fourth quarter ended January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

There was no information required to be disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that was not reported.


9491

Table of Contents



PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors

The information provided under the caption "Nominees and Directors""Director Nominees" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers

Information regarding our executive officers is furnished in a separate item captioned "Executive Officers of the Registrant" included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

The nature of certain relationships and related party transactions between any director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director is stated under the captions "Nominees and Directors""Director Nominees" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Audit Committee Financial Expert and Identification of the Audit Committee

The information provided under the caption "Audit Committee Report" in the Proxy Statement, regarding the Audit Committee financial experts and the identification of the Audit Committee members, is incorporated herein by reference.

Director Nomination Process

The information provided under the caption "Director Nomination Process" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information provided under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Business Ethics that applies to our directors and all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our principal accounting officer. Our Code of Business Ethics is available on our website, www.investors.bestbuy.com.

A copy of our Code of Business Ethics may also be obtained, without charge, upon written request to Best Buy Co., Inc. Investor Relations Department at 7601 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423-3645.

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer by posting such information within two business days of any such amendment or waiver on our website, www.investors.bestbuy.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information set forth under the caption "Executive and Director Compensation" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


92

Table of Contents



Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans


95

Table of Contents

Information regarding securities authorized for issuanceThe following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans is furnished as a separate item captioned "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" included in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.February 3, 2018:
Plan Category
Securities to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights(1) (a)
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share of Outstanding Options and Rights(2)
(b)
 
Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(3)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders6,390,492 $32.32
 23,182,825
(1)Includes grants of stock options and restricted stock units (which may be market-based, performance-based or time-based) awarded under our 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended, and our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
(2)Includes weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.
(3)Includes 4,003,384 shares of our common stock which have been reserved for issuance under our 2008 and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plans.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information provided under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information provided under the captions "Director Independence," "Nominees and Directors""Director Nominees" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information provided under the caption "Ratification of Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Principal Accountant Services and Fees" in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


9693

Table of Contents



PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.Financial Statements:

All financial statements as set forth under Item 8 of this report.

2.Supplementary Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Other schedules have not been included because they are not applicable or because the information is included elsewhere in this report.

3.Exhibits:
Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1
 Implementation Agreement, dated April 29, 2013, by and among Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy UK Holdings LP, Best Buy Distributions Limited, New BBED Limited and Carphone Warehouse Group, plc 8-K 2.1
 4/30/2013  
3.1
 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation DEF 14A n/a
 5/12/2009  
3.2
 Amended and Restated By-Laws 8-K 3.1
 9/26/2013  
4.1
 Form of Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee S-3ASR 4.1
 3/8/2011  
4.2
 Form of First Supplemental Indenture, to be dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.2
 3/11/2011  
4.3
 Second Supplement Indenture, dated as of July 16, 2013, to the Indenture dated as of March 11, 2011, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor trustee 8-K 4.1
 7/16/2013  
10.1
 Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2014, among Best Buy Co., Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent 8-K 10.1
 7/2/2014  
*10.2
 Best Buy Co., Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended S-8 99
 7/15/2011  
*10.3
 Best Buy Co., Inc. Short Term Incentive Plan, as approved by the Board of Directors DEF 14A n/a
 5/26/2011  
*10.4
 2010 Long-Term Incentive Program Award Agreement, as approved by the Board of Directors 10-K 10.7
 4/28/2010  
*10.5
 Form of Long-Term Incentive Program Buy-Out Award Agreement dated September 4, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc. 10-Q 10.3
 9/6/2012  
*10.6
 Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Continuity Award Agreement dated June 21, 2012 10-Q 10.1
 9/6/2012  
*10.7
 Employment Agreement, dated November 9, 2012, between Sharon McCollam and Best Buy Co., Inc. 8-K 10.1
 11/15/2012  
*10.8
 Employment Agreement, dated August 19, 2012, between Hubert Joly and Best Buy Co., Inc. 8-K 10.1
 8/21/2012  
*10.9
 Letter Agreement, dated March 25, 2013, between Best Buy Co., Inc. and Richard M. Schulze 8-K 99.2
 3/25/2013  
Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
  8-K 2.1
 4/30/2013  
  DEF 14A n/a
 5/12/2009  
  8-K 3.1
 9/26/2013  
  S-3ASR 4.1
 3/8/2011  
  8-K 4.2
 3/11/2011  
  8-K 4.1
 7/16/2013  
  8-K 10.1
 6/30/2016  
  S-8 99
 7/15/2011  
  10-K 10.7
 4/28/2010  
  10-Q 10.3
 9/6/2012  
  8-K 10.1
 8/21/2012  
  8-K 99.2
 3/25/2013  
  10-K 10.18
 3/28/2014  
  10-K 10.19
 3/28/2014  
  10-K 10.20
 3/28/2014  
  10-K 10.21
 3/28/2014  

9794

Table of Contents



Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed
No. Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Filing Date Herewith

10.11
 Best Buy Mobile Performance Award Termination Agreement10-K10.18
3/28/2014
*10.11
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program Award10-K10.19
3/28/2014
*10.12
Form of Best Buy Co., Inc. Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement10-K10.20
3/28/2014
*10.13
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-U.S. Directors10-K10.21
3/28/2014
*10.14
 10-Q 10.1
 12/5/2014  

10.12
  S-8 99
 6/27/2014  

10.13
  10-Q 10.1
 9/10/2014  

10.14
  10-Q 10.2
 9/10/2014  

10.15
  10-K 10.19
 3/31/2015  

10.16
  10-Q 10.1
 9/4/2015  

10.17
  10-Q 10.2
 9/4/2015  
12.110-Q10.1
 6/9/2016
10-Q10.2
6/9/2016
10-Q10.1
9/30/2016
10-Q10.1
6/5/2017
10-Q10.2
6/5/2017
S-899
6/21/2017
10-Q10.2
9/5/2017
10-Q10.3
9/5/2017
    
   X

     
   X

     
   X

     
   X

     
   X

     
   X

     
   X

95

Table of Contents



ExhibitIncorporated by ReferenceFiled
No.Exhibit DescriptionFormExhibitFiling DateHerewith
101
 The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2016,2018, filed with the SEC on March 23, 2016,April 2, 2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the consolidated balance sheets at January 30, 2016February 3, 2018, and January 31, 2015,28, 2017, (ii) the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, (iii) the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, (iv) the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, (v) the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders' equity for the years ended February 3, 2018, January 28, 2017, and January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.        
* Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has not filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K certain instruments with respect to long-term debt under which the amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant. The registrant hereby agrees to furnish copies of all such instruments to the SEC upon request.

The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this report are not intended to provide factual information or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents

98

Table of Contents

were made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.


9996

Table of Contents



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Best Buy Co., Inc.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Hubert Joly
  
Hubert Joly
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  March 23, 2016April 2, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Title Date
/s/ Hubert Joly Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Hubert Joly (principal executive officer)  
     
/s/ Sharon L. McCollamCorie Barry Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Sharon L. McCollamCorie Barry 
 (principal financial officer)
  
     
/s/ Mathew R. Watson Senior Vice President, Finance - Controller and Chief Accounting Officer March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Mathew R. Watson 
 (principal accounting officer)
  
     
/s/ Bradbury H. AndersonDirectorMarch 23, 2016
Bradbury H. Anderson
/s/ Lisa M. Caputo Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Lisa M. Caputo    
     
/s/ J. Patrick Doyle Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
J. Patrick Doyle    
     
/s/ Russell P. Fradin Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Russell P. Fradin    
     
/s/ Kathy J. Higgins Victor Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Kathy J. Higgins Victor    
     
/s/ David W. Kenny Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
David W. Kenny    
     
/s/ Karen A. McLoughlin Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Karen A. McLoughlin    
     
/s/ Thomas L. Millner Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Thomas L. Millner    
     
/s/ Claudia F. Munce Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Claudia F. Munce    
     
/s/ Gérard VittecoqRichelle P. Parham Director March 23, 2016April 2, 2018
Gérard VittecoqRichelle P. Parham    


10097

Table of Contents



Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(
$ in millions)millions
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts
 
Other(1)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
 
Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts
 
Other(1)
 
Balance at
End of
Period
Year ended February 3, 2018       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$52
 $29
 $(44) $37
Year ended January 28, 2017       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$49
 $44
 $(41) $52
Year ended January 30, 2016              
Allowance for doubtful accounts$59
 $30
 $(40) $49
$59
 $30
 $(40) $49
Year ended January 31, 2015       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$104
 $1
 $(46) $59
Year ended February 1, 2014       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$92
 $76
 $(64) $104
(1)Includes bad debt write-offs, and recoveries acquisitions and the effect of foreign currency fluctuations.


10198