Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(X)    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 30, 201729, 2018

or

( )    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission file number: 0-15386

CERNER CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
cernerlogosmalla04.jpg
43-1196944
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2800 Rockcreek Parkway
North Kansas City, MO
64117
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

(816) 221-1024
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class  Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share  
The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [X]     No [  ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [  ]     No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]     No [  ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X]     No [  ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X]     Accelerated filer [  ]     Non-accelerated filer [  ] (do not check if smaller reporting company)    
Smaller reporting company [  ] Emerging growth company [  ]
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [  ]       No [X]
As of June 30, 2017,29, 2018, the aggregate market value of the registrant’sregistrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $19.5$18.8 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer, director and holder of 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status for purposes of this calculation is not intended as a conclusive determination of affiliate status for other purposes.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’sregistrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class  Outstanding at February 1, 2018January 28, 2019
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share  332,597,323324,360,908 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document  Parts into Which Incorporated
Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Shareholders' Meeting to be held May 18, 201830, 2019  Part III




Table of Contents

CERNER CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Part I  
Item 1.Business
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.Properties
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
   
Part II  
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.Other Information
   
Part III  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
   
Part IV  
Item 15.Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules
   
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary
   
Signatures



Table of Contents

PART I.

Item 1. BusinessBusiness.

Overview
Cerner Corporation started doing business as a Missouri corporation in 1980 and was merged into a Delaware corporation in 1986. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to "Cerner," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" mean Cerner Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Our corporate world headquarters is located in a Company-owned office park in North Kansas City, Missouri, with our principal place of business located at 2800 Rockcreek Parkway, North Kansas City, Missouri 64117. Our telephone number is 816.221.1024. Our Web site, which we use to communicate important business information, can be accessed at: www.cerner.com. We make our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports available free of charge on or through this Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We do not intend for information contained in our website to be part of this annual report on Form 10-K.
 
Cerner is a leading supplier of health care information technology ("HCIT") solutions and tech-enabled services. Our mission is to contribute to the systemic improvement ofrelentlessly seek breakthrough innovation that will shape health care delivery and the health of communities.tomorrow. We offer a wide range of intelligent solutions and tech-enabled services that support the clinical, financial and operational needs of organizations of all sizes. We have systems in more than 27,00027,500 facilities worldwide, including hospitals, physician practices, laboratories, ambulatory centers, behavioral health centers, cardiac facilities, radiology clinics, surgery centers, extended care facilities, retail pharmacies, and employer sites.

Cerner® solutions are offered on the unified Cerner Millennium® architecture and on the HealtheIntentSM® cloud-based platform. Cerner Millennium is a person-centric computing framework, which includes integrated clinical, financial and management information systems. This architecture allows providers to securely access an individual's electronic health record ("EHR") at the point of care, and it organizes and proactively delivers information to meet the specific needs of physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, pharmacists, front- and back-office professionals and consumers. Our HealtheIntent platform is a cloud-based platform designed to scale at a population level while facilitating health and care at a person and provider level. On the HealtheIntent platform, we offer solutions that aggregate, transform and reconcile data across the continuum of care, enabling key stakeholders to manage the health of populations, improve outcomes and lower costs. Cerner also has an EHR agnostic platform, CareAware®, that facilitates connectivity of health care devices to EHRs, allowing for more efficient and effective care.

On February 2, 2015, Cerner acquired Siemensthe Health Services (now referred to as "Cerner Health Services"). Cerner Health Services offersbusiness from Siemens AG, which offered a portfolio of enterprise-level clinical and financial health care information technology solutions, as well as departmental, connectivity, population health, and care coordination solutions globally.

We offer a broad range of tech-enabled services, including implementation and training, remote hosting, operational management services, revenue cycle services, support and maintenance, health care data analysis, clinical process optimization, transaction processing, employer health centers, employee wellness programs and third partythird-party administrator services for employer-based health plans.

In addition to software and services, we offer a wide range of complementary hardware and devices, both directly from Cerner and as a reseller for third parties.

The following table presents our consolidated revenues by major solutions and servicesour business models and by segment, as a percentage of total revenues:

For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
201720162015201820172016
  
Revenues by Solutions & Services 
System sales26%26%29%
Revenues by Business Models 
Licensed software11%12%11%
Technology resale5%5%6%
Subscriptions6%9%9%
Professional services34%31%30%
Managed services21%21%21%
Support and maintenance21%21%22%21%20%21%
Services51%51%47%
Reimbursed travel2%2%2%2%2%2%
100%100%100%100%100%100%
  
Revenues by Segment  
Domestic89%89%88%88%89%89%
Global11%11%12%12%11%11%
100%100%100%100%100%100%

Health Care and Health Care IT Industry
Health care expenditures continue to consume an increasing portion of most economies. In the U.S., health care spending increased 4.33.9 percent to $3.30$3.5 trillion in 2016, growing to2017, and now represents 17.9 percent of the U.S.'s' Gross Domestic Product ("GDP"). An aging population and high levels of chronic conditions are contributing to expectations that health care expenditures will continue growing faster than the economy. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") estimates annual U.S. health care spending will be $5.55grow at an average rate of 5.5 percent through 2026 and reach $5.7 trillion, or 19.919.7 percent of GDP by 2025.2026. We believe this trajectory is unsustainable and that health care IT can play an important role in facilitating a shift from a high-cost health care system that incents volume to a proactive system that incents health, quality and efficiency.

For this change to occur, we believe traditional fee-for-service ("FFS") reimbursement models must continue to shift to value-based approaches that are more aligned with quality, outcomes, and efficiency. A signal of this shift occurred in January of 2015 when the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services laid out a plan to shift 50 percent of Medicare payments to value-based payment models by the end of 2018, and to tie 90 percent of the remaining traditional FFS payments to quality measures.

The shift away from traditional FFS is also evident in growth of lives covered under Accountable Care Organizations ("ACOs"). ACOs are groups of hospitals and providers that focus on providing coordinated, high quality care to Medicare, Medicaid, or commercially insured populations and then share in savings created by lowering the cost of care. According to the Leavitt Partners, publication, Projected Growth of Accountable Care Organizations, December 2015, lives covered under ACOs grew from approximately 5 million in 2011 to more than 2032 million in 20152018.

In addition to the increasing number of lives covered under ACOs, the structure of ACOs is evolving to where providers are expected to assume more risk. Currently, most ACO contracts are upside only, which means providers can receive bonuses for good performance, but they assume no downside for underperformance. In 2018, CMS released a rule called "Pathways to Success" that accelerates the timeframe during which providers need to move to ACOs that include both upside bonuses and are projecteddownside penalties. We believe this shift is important as assumption of risk by providers creates a strong incentive for them to be more than 100 million by 2020.improve care coordination and deliver high quality care at a lower cost.

Another step towards a value-based model occurred with the passage of The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act ("MACRA"), which enacts significant reforms to the payment programs under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and consolidated three current value-based programs into one.

While each of the different approaches to aligning reimbursement with value has faced challenges in implementation and will continue to evolve, we believe the trend away from traditional FFS will continue. We believe this growth in government and private models aligning payment with value, quality and outcomes will drive major changes in the way health care is provided in the next decade, and we expect a much greater focus on patient engagement, wellness and prevention. As health care providers become accountable for proactively managing the health of the populations they serve, we expect them to need ongoing investment in sophisticated information technology solutions that will enable them to predict when intervention is needed so they can improve outcomes and lower the cost of providing care.


The increasingly complex and more clinical outcomes-based reimbursement environment is also contributing to a heightened demand for revenue cycle solutions and services and a desire for these solutions and services to be closely aligned with clinical solutions. We believe this trend is positive for Cerner because our Cerner Millennium revenue cycle solutions and services are integrated with our clinical solutions, creating a clinically driven revenue cycle solution that has had significant adoption in recent years.


Over the past several years, we have also seen a shift in the U.S. marketplace towards a preference for a single platform across inpatient and ambulatory settings. The number of physicians employed by hospitals has increased as hospitals have acquired physician groups, and health systems are recognizing the benefit of having a single patient record at the hospital and the physician office. We are benefiting from this trend due to our unified Cerner Millennium platform, which spans multiple venues, and ongoing enhancements we have made to our physician solutions.

While health care providers are showing a preference for a single platform across multiple venues, there is also an increased push for interoperability across disparate systems to address the reality that no patient's record will only have information from a single health care IT system. We believe health information should be shareable and accessible among primary care physicians, specialists, and hospital physicians.

As a result, Cerner has led or been a key participant in nearly every major industry effort to advance interoperability and system openness. One example is Cerner's role as a founding member of the CommonWell Health Alliance, an open, not-for-profit industry consortium that brought health care IT firms together for the purpose of enabling safe nationwide interoperability. The vision of CommonWell is for a patient to be able to visit a new doctor, give their consent, and, within moments, have his or her lifetime record available from all the prior places he or she has visited.

In 2018, CommonWell members represent about 70 percentannounced general availability of the acute care market and about 30 percent of the ambulatory market. CommonWell membership also spans a diverse range of clinical care settings beyond acute and ambulatory, including health IT market leaders in imaging, perinatal, emergency department, laboratory, retail pharmacy, oncology, care management, patient portal, post-acute care, and state and federal government agencies. In 2016, CommonWell andits connection to CareQuality, another national interoperability framework, announced an agreementframework. This connection allows CommonWell and CareQuality enabled health care providers to work togetherconnect and leveragebilaterally exchange health data to improve care coordination and delivery. This is a significant milestone on the respective strengths of each organizationpath to create a levelachieving true nationwide interoperability playing field for all provider organizations that wishand making health data available to share clinical information using standards-based queries. This agreement is expected to create near-universal connectivity that establishes a baseline query capability for allindividuals and providers regardless of their EHR supplier.where care occurs.

Outside the United States, we believe Cerner's growth opportunities are good, as most countries are also dealing with health care expenditures growing faster than their economies, which is leading to a focus on controlling costs while also improving quality of care.

Cerner Vision and Growth Strategy
For nearly four decades, Cerner has focused on creating innovation at the intersection of health care and information technology. Together with our clients, we are creating a future where the health care system works to improve the well-being of individuals and communities. Our vision has always guided our large investments in research and development ("R&D"), which have created strong levels of organic growth throughout our history. Our proven ability to innovate has led to what we believe to be industry-leading architectures and an unmatched breadth and depth of solutions and services. The strength of our solutions and services has led to our ability to gain market share in recent years, which has contributed to our growth. We believe we are positioned to continue gaining sharegrowing in coming years as regulatory requirements and industry shifts continue to pressure health care providers to improve quality while lowering costs, which we believe will require having more sophisticated information technology than many of our competitors provide. We also have opportunities

A key area of growth for Cerner in recent years has been in the U.S. Federal government sector. As part of the Leidos Partnership for Defense Health, Cerner has played a key role in the U.S. Department of Defense's ("DoD") EHR rollout, which achieved completion of its fourth pilot site in 2018. Broader deployment has kicked off with implementations beginning at four additional sites in the second half of 2018. Also, Cerner was selected in 2018 by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") to gain market share as our large healthreplace their existing EHR system clients purchase other hospitals, which is often followed by purchasing Cerner solutions forwith one based on the acquired hospitals so they can benefit from standardizationEHR being deployed across the combined entities.DoD health system. With the VA managing one of the largest health systems in the world, this opportunity is expected to contribute to Cerner's growth for several years. In addition, we believe there is potential for this project to have broad industry impact. At the core of this project, Cerner aims to enable seamless care through a single system that links both veteran and military populations, totaling more than 18 million people, while also delivering national interoperability to the commercial market. This will allow patient data to be shared between VA, DoD, and community providers through a secure system.

In addition to growth by gaining market share,growing our client base, we believe we have a significantan opportunity to grow revenues by expanding our solution footprint with existing clients. For example, only about 40 percentless than half of our Cerner Millennium EHR clients have implemented Cerner revenue cycle solutions. This penetration has been growing in recent years and we expect it to continue because of the preference for having EHR and revenue cycle systems provided on the same platform. There is also opportunity to expand penetration

of other solutions, such as women's health, anesthesiology, imaging, clinical process optimization, critical care, health care devices, device connectivity, emergency department and surgery.

We also have an opportunity to grow by expanding penetration ofour services we offer that are targeted at capturing a larger percentage of our clients' existing IT spending. These services leverage our proven operational capabilities and the success of our CernerWorksSM managed services business, where we have demonstrated the ability to improve our clients' service levels at a cost that is at or below amounts they were previously spending. One of these services is Cerner ITWorksSM, a suite of solutions and services that improves the ability of hospital IT departments to meet their organization's needs while also creating a closer alignment between Cerner and our clients. A second example is Cerner RevWorksSM, which includes solutions and services to help health care organizations improve their revenue cycle functions.


Over the past several years,Another area in which we continue to have had success at sellingis our solutions to smaller hospitals because of progress at reducing the total cost of owning our solutions. Our CommunityWorksSM offering, which leverages a shared instance of the Cerner Millennium platform across multiple clients, allowing us to offer low-cost, high-value solutions and services to smaller community hospitals and critical access hospitals. We believe there continues to be a good opportunity to grow in the small hospital market given many of the existing suppliers in this market have struggled to keep up with ongoing regulatory requirements and marketplace expectations.

We also expect to drive growth over the course of the next decade through initiatives outside the core HCIT market. For example, we offer clinic, pharmacy, wellness and third-party administratoradministration services directly to employers. In 2019, we're expanding our onsite services to include a multi-employer tenant clinic model, serving employers who would not normally be able to support their own onsite clinic. These offerings have been shaped by what we have learned from changes we have implemented at Cerner. We have removed our third-party administrator and become self-administered, launched an on-site clinic and pharmacy, incorporated biometric measurements for our associate population, realigned the economic incentives for associates in our health plan, and implemented a data-driven wellness management program. These changes have had a positive impact on the health of our associates while also keeping our health care costs below industry averages.

As discussed below, another significant opportunity for future growth, and a large area of investment for Cerner, is leveraging the vast amounts of data being created as the health care industry is digitized and using this data to help providers and employers manage the health of populations.

Population Health
Population Health Management involves a shift from solely automating health systems to managing a person’sperson's health. Getting there requires complete and accurate patient data and meaningfully using that data to engage individuals, exchange information between providers and ultimately drive better outcomes at a lower cost. ThisWe believe this shift will shape the future of health care and enable a system driven by accountability, transparency and value.

Cerner's approach to population health is to enable organizations to:

KNOW what is happening and predict what will happen within their population through solutions for data exchange, longitudinal record, enterprise data warehouse, analytics and quality and regulatory reporting;
ENGAGE providers and patients in health and care delivery through personal health portals and solutions for care management, home care, long-term care, and retail pharmacy; and
MANAGE health and improve care with capacity and workforce management, clinical research, predictive modeling, health registries, and contract and network management.

These solutions are enabled by Cerner’sCerner's HealtheIntent platform, which is a multi-purpose, programmable platform designed to scale at a population level while facilitating health and care at a person and provider level. This cloud-based platform enables organizations to aggregate, transform and reconcile data across the continuum of care, and helps improve outcomes and lower costs.

HealtheIntent is scalable, secure and can be accessed anywhere, anytime. It is able to receive data from any EHR, existing HCITclinical or revenue cycle system and also incorporate other data, sources, such as pharmacy, benefits managers or insurance claims.claims, patient satisfaction, socioeconomic, genomic and dozens of open data sources. HealtheIntent collects the data from multiple,these disparate sources in near real-time, providing clarity to millions of data points in an actionable and programmable workflow. It enables organizations to identify, score and predict the risks of individual patients, allowing them to match the right care programs to the right individuals. The EHR-agnostic nature of our HealtheIntent platform allows us to offer our solutions to the entire marketplace, not just existing Cerner clients.


We have created a series of initial solutions on the HealtheIntent platform, including the following solutions that are generally available or being released soon:solutions:

Longitudinal Record - provides clinicians and the patient a view of their consolidated clinical record, gathered and normalized from multiple sources.
Registries and Scorecards - identifies and automatically segments patients by disease, guides interventions according to clinical best practice, provides visibility to quality measures for provider’sprovider's population, produces client-defined performance scorecards, and tracks their health and their interventions according to clinical best practice.
Enterprise and Population Health Analytics - allows the integrated data to be analyzed for the purpose of population health management and research.
Provider Performance Management - creates visibility for providers on their performance against key clinical and operation metrics and can be aligned with payment models that incentivize high quality and efficient care.

Patient/Member Engagement - an enhanced patient portal complemented by engagement services to help health care organizations create more meaningful interactions and engagement with the members they serve, and provides the ability to target individuals at risk of becoming chronically ill.
Community Care Management - provides a person-centric approach of proactive surveillance, coordination and facilitation of health services across the care continuum to achieve optimal health status, quality and costs.
Population Health Programs - leverages evidence-based guidelines and the contextual information within HealtheIntent to provide identification, prediction and management of a condition at the population, provider and person level and facilitates a personalized plan of care for each member.
Contract and Network Management - for managing provider networks, modeling to inform payer negotiations, determining appropriate business models, and managing contract performance in near real-time.

In less than fourfive years since the first HealtheIntent solution went live at our alpha client, more than 140155 clients have purchased HealtheIntent solutions. The broad addressable market for population health solutions is reflected in the diversity of these clients, which include health systems, physician groups, employers, health plans, state governments, and accountable care organizations. The initial adoption by a large number of clients is encouraging and positions us for larger contributions to revenue from HealtheIntent solutions as these initial clients and others transition away from FFS models to value-based and at-risk models that require population health solutions and services. The data variety and scalability of the HealtheIntent platform has also grown quickly, as reflected in its over 5001,025 data connections, including over 3060 EHR systems and 55140 claims and payer systems, and records for more than 100218 million people.

In 2018, we announced a collaboration with Lumeris Healthcare Outcomes, LLC ("Lumeris") that we believe will strengthen our ability to help health systems succeed in a value-based care market. Lumeris is a company with a consistently highly rated Medicare Advantage plan, a proven methodology to help leading health systems advance value-based care strategies, and the subject matter expertise required to support those efforts. Cerner and Lumeris are launching an EHR-agnostic offering called Maestro AdvantageTM that is designed to help health systems set up and manage Medicare Advantage Plans and provider-sponsored health plans. As part of the collaboration, Lumeris is adopting HealtheIntent as the platform for its clinical methodology and advanced analytics. With this relationship, we gain a partner with a 4.5-Star Medicare Advantage plan to build out the end-to-end capabilities required to run a provider-sponsored health plan within HealtheIntent. We also gain an opportunity to be a larger participant in the economics of the provider-sponsored health plan market by being able to offer additional services as part of the Maestro Advantage offering, such as care management and provider engagement, along with the solutions on the HealtheIntent platform.

In summary, we believe our comprehensive architectural approach to population health is differentiated in the marketplace. We expect population health to be a large contributor to our long-term growth as health care continues to evolve towards a model that incents keeping people healthy.

Software Development
We commit significant resources to developing new health information system solutions and services. As of the end of 2017,2018, approximately 6,6007,300 associates were engaged in research and development activities. Total expenditures for the development and enhancement of our software solutions were $747 million, $706 million $705 million and $685$705 million during the 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 fiscal years, respectively. These figures include both capitalized and non-capitalized portions and exclude amounts amortized for financial reporting purposes.

As discussed above, continued investment in R&D remains a core element of our strategy. This will include ongoing enhancement of our core solutions and development of new solutions and services.


Intellectual Property
We have a broad portfolio of intellectual property rights to protect the proprietary interests in our solutions, services, devices and brands. Our solutions constitute works of authorship protected by copyrights in the U.S. and globally. We own valuable trade secrets embodied in, or related to, our solutions, services and devices and protect these rights through a number of technical and legal measures. We have registered or applied to register certain trademarks and service marks in a number of countries with particular emphasis on the Cerner branding elements. We continue to develop our patent portfolio and own more than 400440 issued patents with hundreds of patent applications pending. We do not consider any of our businesses to be dependent upon any one patent, copyright, trademark, or trade secret, or any family or families of the same.

Our solutions, devices and services incorporate or rely on intellectual property rights licensed from third parties, including software subject to open source software licenses. Certain technologies licensed to Cerner are also important for internal use in running our business and supporting our clients. Although replacing any existing licenses could be inconvenient, based on our experiences, existing contractual relationships, and the incentives of our technology suppliers, we believe that Cerner will continue to obtain these technologies or suitable alternatives for commercially reasonable prices on commercially reasonable terms or under open source software licenses acceptable to Cerner.

Managing Cybersecurity Risks

Our business operations, including the provision of the solutions and services described above, involve the compilation, hosting and transmission of confidential information, including patient health information. We have included security features in our solutions and services that are intended to protect the privacy and integrity of this information, but our solutions and services may be vulnerable to security breaches, viruses, programming errors and other similar disruptive problems. Cerner maintains documented information privacy, security and risk management programs with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, policies, and procedures which are designed to secure the information maintained on Cerner's platforms.

In addition, all of our associates are required to complete annual cybersecurity education and training, which includes identifying suspicious emails, Internet threats, telecommunication threats and ransomware. Cerner regularly reviews and modifies its security program to reflect changing technology, regulatory environment, laws, risk, industry and security practices and other business needs. We believe our policies and procedures are adequate to ensure that relevant information about cybersecurity risks and incidents is appropriately reported and disclosed.

Sales and Marketing
The markets for Cerner HCIT solutions, health care devices and services include integrated delivery networks, physician groups and networks, managed care organizations, hospitals, medical centers, free-standing reference laboratories, home health agencies, blood banks, imaging centers, pharmacies, pharmaceutical manufacturers, employers, governments and public health organizations. The majority of our sales are clinical and revenue cycle solutions and services to hospitals and health systems, but our solutions and services are highly scalable and sold to organizations ranging from physician practices, to community hospitals, to complex integrated delivery networks, to local, regional and national government agencies. Sales

to large health systems typically take approximately nine to 18 months, while the sales cycle is often shorter when selling to smaller hospitals and physician practices.

Our executive marketing management is located at our Realization Campusworld headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri, while our client representatives are deployed across the United States and globally. In addition to the United States, through our subsidiaries, we have sales associates and/or offices giving us a presence in more than 35 countries.

We support our sales force with technical personnel who perform demonstrations of Cerner solutions and services and assist clients in determining the proper hardware and software configurations. Our primary direct marketing strategy is to generate sales contacts from our existing client base and through presentations at industry seminars and tradeshows. We market the PowerWorks®our ambulatory solutions, offered on a subscription basis, directly to the physician practice market using lead generation activities and through existing acute care clients that are looking to extend Cerner solutions to affiliated physicians. We attend a number of major tradeshows each year and sponsor executive user conferences, which feature industry experts who address the HCIT needs of large health care organizations.

Client Services
Substantially all of Cerner’sCerner's clients that buy software solutions also enter into software support agreements with us for maintenance and support of their Cerner systems. In addition to immediate software support in the event of problems, these agreements allow clients to access new releases of the Cerner solutions covered by support agreements. Each client has 24-hour access to the applicable client support teams, including those located at our world headquarters in North Kansas

City, Missouri, our Continuous Campus in Kansas City, Kansas, our campus in Malvern, Pennsylvania, and our global support organizations in Germany, England and Ireland.

Most clients who buy hardware through Cerner also enter into hardware maintenance agreements with us. These arrangements normally provide for a fixed monthly fee for specified services. In the majority of cases, we utilize subcontractors to meet our hardware maintenance obligations. We also offer a set of managed services that include remote hosting, operational management services and disaster recovery.

Backlog
At the end of 2017, we had a revenue backlog of $17.5 billion,Backlog, which compares to $15.9 billion at the end of 2016. Such backlog representsreflects contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized. We currently estimate that approximately 26% percent of the backlog at the end of 2017 will be recognized as revenue, during 2018.was $15.25 billion as of December 29, 2018, of which we expect to recognize approximately 29% as revenue over the next 12 months. In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance as further discussed in Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements. In connection with the adoption of such guidance, we modified our calculation of backlog as previously determined under Regulation S-K to represent the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially satisfied) to conform to the new revenue recognition guidance. Backlog amounts disclosed prior to the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance have not been adjusted, and are not comparable to, the current period presentation.
We believe that backlog may not necessarily be a comprehensive indicator of future revenue as certain of our arrangements may be canceled (or conversely renewed) at our clients' option, thus contract consideration related to such cancellable periods has been excluded from our calculation of backlog. However, historically our experience has been that such cancellation provisions are rarely exercised. We expect to recognize approximately $525 million of revenue over the next 12 months under currently executed contracts related to such cancellable periods, which is not included in our calculation of backlog.

Competition
The market for HCIT solutions, devices and services is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to rapid technological change. We offer a suite of intelligent solutions and services that support the clinical, financial and operational needs of organizations of all sizes. The principle markets in which we compete include, without limitation, health care software solutions, HCIT services, ambulatory, health care device and technology resale, health care revenue cycle and transaction services, value-based care technologies, analytics systems, care management solutions, population health management, and post-acute care. Our principal existing competitors, including their affiliates, in these markets include, but are not limited to:

Ÿ Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
Ÿ InterSystems Corporation
Ÿ athenahealth, Inc.
Ÿ MEDHOST, Inc.
Ÿ Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.
Ÿ Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH)
Ÿ eClinicalWorks, LLC
Ÿ Optum, Inc.
Ÿ Epic Systems Corporation
 

In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, start-up companies, managed care companies, healthcare insurance companies, accountable care organizations and others specializing in the health care industry may offer competitive software solutions, devices or services. The pace of change in the HCIT market is rapid and there are frequent new software solutions, devices or services introductions, enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets include the breadth and quality of solution and service offerings, the stability of the solution provider, the features and capabilities of the information systems and devices, the ongoing support for the systems and devices and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions and devices. We believe that we compete favorably with our competitors on the basis of these factors and that we are the leader- or among the leaders- in each of our main offerings. Our brand recognition and reputation for innovative technology and service delivery, combined

with our breadth of solution and services offerings, global distribution channels and client relationships position us as a strong competitor going forward.

Number of Employees (Associates)
At the end of 2017,2018, we employed approximately 26,00029,200 associates worldwide.

Operating Segments
Information about our operating segments, which are geographically based, may be found in Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" below and in Note (17) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth the names, ages, positions and certain other information regarding the Company's executive officers as of February 1, 2018.January 28, 2019. Officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Name Age Positions
Brent Shafer 6061 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
     
Clifford W. Illig67Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Zane M. Burke52President
Marc G. Naughton 6263 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
     
Michael R. Nill 5354 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
     
John Peterzalek58Executive Vice President and Chief Client Officer
Randy D. Sims 5758 SeniorExecutive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
     
Jeffrey A. Townsend 5455 Executive Vice President and Chief of StaffInnovation
Donald Trigg47Executive Vice President, Strategic Growth
     
Julia M. Wilson 5556 Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer

Brent Shafer was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors effective February 1, 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Shafer served as Chief Executive Officer of Philips North America, a health technology company and the North American division of Koninklijke Philips N.V. ("Philips") since February 2014. In that position, Mr. Shafer led an organization of 17,000 employees and oversaw a health technology portfolio that included a broad range of solutions and services covering patient monitoring, imaging, clinical informatics, sleep and respiratory care as well as a group of market-leading consumer-oriented brands. For 12 years, Mr. Shafer played a key role in helping Philips develop and strengthen its health care focus, increase its profitability and grow its market share. Prior to his most recent position, Mr. Shafer served as Chief Executive Officer of the global Philips' Home Healthcare Solutions business, a home healthcare services provider with 6,000 employees, from May 2010 until May 2014, as Chief Executive Officer of the North America region for Royal Philips Electronics from January 2009 until May 2010, and as president and Chief Executive Officer of the Healthcare Sales and Service business for Philips North America from May 2005 until May 2010. Prior to joining Philips, Mr. Shafer served in various senior leadership positions with other companies, including Hill-Rom Company Inc., GE Medical Systems, and Hewlett-Packard.

Clifford W. Illig, co-founder of the Company, has been a Director of the Company for more than five years. He previously served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company until October 1998, President of the Company until March of 1999, and Interim Chief Executive Officer from July 2017 to January 2018. Mr. Illig was appointed Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors in March of 1999 and served in that capacity until July 2017 when he was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors. He resumed his role as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors concurrent with the appointment of Mr. Shafer as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, effective February 1, 2018.

Zane M. Burke joined the Company in September 1996. Since that time, he has held a variety of client-facing sales, implementation and support roles, including Corporate Controller and Vice President of Finance. He was promoted to President of the Company’s West region in 2002 and Senior Vice President of National Alignment in 2006. He was further promoted to Executive Vice President - Client Organization in July 2011 and to President of the Company in September 2013.


Marc G. Naughton joined the Company in November 1992 as Manager of Taxes. In November 1995 he was named Chief Financial Officer and in February 1996 he was promoted to Vice President. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2002 and promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2010.

Michael R. Nill joined the Company in November 1996. Since that time he has held several positions in the Technology, Intellectual Property and CernerWorks Client Hosting Organizations. He was promoted to Vice President in January 2000, promoted to Senior Vice President in April 2006 and promoted to Executive Vice President and named Chief Engineering Officer in February 2009. Mr. Nill was appointed Chief Operating Officer in May 2011.

John Peterzalek joined the Company in 2003 as President, Cerner South East and has held a variety of business and client leadership roles since that time, including Senior Vice President, East Region, a title which he held from 2007 to 2014 when he was named Senior Vice President, Client Relationships. He was promoted to Executive Vice President, Client Relationships in April 2017 and Executive Vice President, Worldwide Client Relationships in October 2017. He held the title of Executive Vice President, Worldwide Client Relationships until September 2018 when he was named Executive Vice President and Chief Client Officer.As Chief Client Officer, Mr. Peterzalek focuses on driving value, innovation and results to Cerner's clients globally and leads the corporate direction for revenue generation, solution strategy, business development, and marketing.

Randy D. Sims joined the Company in March 1997 as Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, and was promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2011.2011, and Executive Vice President in April 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sims worked at Farmland Industries, Inc. for three years where he last served as Associate General Counsel. Prior to Farmland, Mr. Sims was in-house legal counsel at The Marley Company for seven years, holding the position of Assistant General Counsel when he left to join Farmland.

Jeffrey A. Townsend joined the Company in June 1985. Since that time he has held several positions in the Intellectual Property Organization and was promoted to Vice President in February 1997. He was appointed Chief Engineering Officer

in March 1998, promoted to Senior Vice President in March 2001, named Chief of Staff in July 2003 and promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2005.

Donald Trigg serves as Executive Vice President, Strategic Growth. He originally joined the Company in 2002 as Vice President, Corporate Positioning. He has held multiple roles during his time at the Company, including Chief Marketing Officer from 2003 to 2007, General Manager for the Kansas City region from 2006-2007, Managing Director for the United Kingdom and Ireland from 2008-2010 and Senior Vice President and President, Cerner Health Ventures from 2012-2018. From 2010-2012, Mr. Trigg served as Chief Revenue Officer at CodeRyte, Inc prior to its acquisition by 3M's healthcare division. Mr. Trigg also spent more than a decade serving in the public policy space as a senior advisor for the 2000 Bush for President campaign in Austin, TX, the Director of Policy at the U.S. Department of Commerce and in a series of senior policy roles in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.

Julia M. Wilson first joined the Company in July 1990. Since that time, she has held several positions in the Functional Group Organization. She was promoted to Vice President and Chief People Officer in August 2003, to Senior Vice President in March 2007 and to Executive Vice President in March 2013.


Item 1A. Risk FactorsFactors.

Risks Related to our Business

We may incur substantial costs related to product-related liabilities. Many of our software solutions, health care devices, technology-enabled services or other services (collectively referred to as "Solutions and Services") are intended for use in collecting, storing and displaying clinical and health care-related information used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients and in related health care settings such as registration, scheduling and billing. We attempt to limit by contract our liability; however, the limitations of liability set forth in the contracts may not be enforceable or may not otherwise protect us from liability for damages. We may also be subject to claims that are not covered by contract. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover any particular claim that has been brought or that may be brought in the future, that such coverage will prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful material claim or series of claims brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Product-related claims, even if not successful, could damage our reputation, cause us to lose existing clients, limit our ability to obtain new clients, divert management’smanagement's attention from operations, result in significant revenue loss, create potential liabilities for our clients and us and increase insurance and other operational costs.

We may be subject to claims for system errors and warranties. Our Solutions and Services are very complex and may contain design, coding or other errors, especially when first introduced. It is not uncommon for HCIT providers to discover errors in Solutions and Services after their introduction to the market. Similarly, the installation of our Solutions and Services is very complex and errors in the implementation and configuration of our systems can occur. Our Solutions and Services are intended for use in collecting, storing, and displaying clinical and health care-related information used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients and in related health care settings such as registration, scheduling and billing. Therefore, users of our Solutions and Services are less tolerant of errors than the market for other types of technologies generally. Our client agreements typically provide warranties concerning material errors and other matters. If a client's Solutions and Services fail to meet these warranties or leads to faulty clinical decisions or injury to patients, it could 1) constitute a material breach under the client agreement, allowing the client to terminate the agreement and possibly obtain a refund or damages or both, or require us to incur additional expense in order to make the Solution or Service meet these criteria; or 2) subject us to claims or litigation by our clients or clinicians or directly by the patient. Additionally, such failures could damage our reputation and could negatively affect future sales. Our client agreements generally limit our liability arising from such claims but such limits may not be enforceable in certain jurisdictions or circumstances. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover any particular claim that has been brought or that may be brought in the future, that such coverage will prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful material claim or series of claims brought against us, if uninsured or under-insured, could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may experience interruptions at our data centers or client support facilities, which could interrupt clients' access to their data, exposing us to significant costs and reputational harm. We perform data center and/or hosting services for certain clients, including the collection and storage of critical patient and administrative data and the provision of support services through various client support facilities. Our business relies on the secure electronic transmission, data center storage and hosting of sensitive information, including protected health information,information; personally identifiable information, information;

financial informationinformation; and other sensitive information relating to our clients and their patients, providers and certain billing information, our company, our workforce and workforce.our third party suppliers. Complete failure of all local public power and backup generators; impairment of all telecommunications lines; a successful concerted denial of service attack; a significant system, network or data breach; damage, injury or impairment (environmental, accidental or intentional) to the buildings, the equipment inside the buildings housing our data centers, the personnel operating such facilities or the client data contained therein; or errors by the personnel trained to operate such facilities could cause a disruption in operations and negatively impact clients who depend on us for data center and system support services. We offer our clients disaster recovery services for additional fees to protect clients from isolated data center failures, leveraging our multiple data center facilities; however only a small percentage of our hosted clients choose to contract for these services. Additionally, Cerner's core systems are disaster tolerant as we have implemented redundancy across physically diverse data centers. If any of these systems are interrupted, damaged or breached by an unforeseen event or actions of a Cerner associate or contractor or a third party or fail for any extended period of time, it could damage our reputation, cause us to lose existing clients, hurt our ability to obtain new clients, result in significant revenue loss, create potential liabilities for our clients and us, increase insurance and other operating costs and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. We use third party public cloud providers in connection with certain cloud-based offerings and third parties to host our own data, in which case we have to rely on such third parties to prevent service interruption and such reliance is subject to similar risks described above with respect to our own data center and hosting services.


If our IT security is breached, or if the IT security of third parties on which we rely is breached, we could be subject to increased expenses, exposure to legal claims and regulatory actions, and clients and prospective clients could be deterred from using our Solutions and Services. We are in the information technology business, and in providing our Solutions and Services, we store, retrieve, process and manage our clients' information and data (and that of their patients), as well as our own data. We believe we have a reputation for secure and reliable Solution and Service offerings, and we have invested a great deal of time and resources in protecting the security, confidentiality, integrity and availability of our Solutions and Services and the internal and external data that we manage. Third parties attempt to identify and exploit Solution and Service vulnerabilities, penetrate or bypass our security measures, and gain unauthorized access to our or our clients' and suppliers' software, hardware and cloud offerings, networks and systems, any of which could lead to disruptions in mission-critical systems or the unauthorized release or corruption of personal information or the confidential information or data of Cerner, our clients or their patients.

High-profile security breaches at other companies have increased in recent years, and security industry experts and government officials have warned about the risks of hackers and cyber-attacks targeting information technology products and businesses. Although this is an industry-wide problem that affects other software and hardware companies, we may be targeted by computer hackers because we are a prominent health care IT company and have high profile clients, including government clients. These risks will increase as we continue to grow our cloud offerings, collect, store and process increasingly large amounts of our clients' confidential data, including personal health information, and host or manage parts of our clients' businesses in cloud-based/multi-tenant IT environments. We may use third party public cloud providers in connection with ourcertain cloud-based offerings orand third party providers to host our own data, in which case we have to rely on the processes, control and security such third parties have in place to protect the infrastructure.infrastructure, which are subject to similar risks described above with respect to our IT security.

We continue to invest in and improve our threat protection, detection and mitigation policies, procedures and controls. In addition, we work with other companies in the industry on increased awareness and enhanced protections against cybersecurity threats. Because of the evolving nature and sophistication of these security threats, which can be difficult to detect, there can be no assurance that our policies, procedures and controls or those of third parties on which we rely will detect or prevent any of these threats and we cannot predict the full impact of any such past or future incident.

The costs we would incur to address and remediate these security incidents would increase our expenses, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, cessation of service and loss of existing or potential clients that may impede our sales, development of solutions, provision of services or other critical functions. If a cyber-attack or other security incident described above were to allow unauthorized access to or modification of our clients' or suppliers' data, our own data or our IT systems, or if our Solutions or Services are perceived as having security vulnerabilities, we could suffer significant damage to our brand and reputation. This in turn could lead to fewer clients using our Solutions and Services and result in reduced revenue and earnings. These types of security incidents could also lead to lawsuits, regulatory investigations and claims and increased legal liability, including regulatory actions by state and federal government authorities and non-US authorities and, in some cases, contractual costs related to notification and fraud monitoring of impacted persons.We maintain cyber risk insurance, but this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from any future breaches of our IT systems or those of third parties on which we rely.

Our proprietary technology may be subject to claims for infringement or misappropriation of intellectual property rights of others, or our intellectual property rights may be infringed or misappropriated by others. We rely upon a combination of confidentiality practices and policies, license agreements, confidentiality provisions in employment agreements, confidentiality agreements with third parties and technical security measures to maintain the confidentiality, exclusivity and trade secrecy of our proprietary information. We also rely on trademark and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property rights in the U.S. and abroad. We continue to develop our patent portfolio of U.S. and global patents, but these patents do not provide comprehensive protection for the wide range of Solutions and Services we offer. Despite our protective measures and intellectual property rights, we may not be able to adequately protect against theft, copying, reverse engineering, misappropriation, infringement or unauthorized use or disclosure of our intellectual property, which could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.

In addition, we are routinely involved in intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claims, and we expect this activity to continue or even increase as the number of competitors, patents and patent enforcement organizations in the HCIT and broader IT market increases, the functionality of our Solutions and Services expands, the use of open-source software increases and we enter new geographies and new market segments. These claims, even if unmeritorious, are expensive to defend and are often incapable of prompt resolution. If we become liable to third parties for infringing or misappropriating their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial damage award, develop alternative technology, obtain a license or cease using, selling, offering for sale, licensing, implementing or supporting the applicable Solutions and Services.


Many of our software solutions and technology-enabled services contain open source software that may pose particular risks to our proprietary software solutions and technology-enabled services in a manner that could have a negative effect on our business. We rely upon open source software in our software solutions and technology-enabled services. The licensing terms applicable for certain open source software have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts and could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to provide and support our Solutions or Services.

Additionally, we may encounter claims from third parties claiming ownership and unauthorized use of the software purported to be licensed under the open source terms, demanding release of derivative works of open source software that could include our proprietary source code, or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open source licenses. These claims could result in litigation and, even if unmeritorious, could be expensive to defend and incapable of prompt resolution. If we become liable to third parties for such claims, we could be required to make our software source code available under the applicable open source license, utilize or develop alternative technology, or cease using, selling, offering for sale, licensing, implementing or supporting the applicable solutions or technology-enabled services. In addition, use of certain open source software may pose greater risks than use of third party commercial software, as most open source licensors and distributors do not provide commercial warranties or indemnities or controls on the origin of the software.

We may become subject toinvolved in legal proceedings that could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. From time to time and in the ordinary course of our business, we and certain of our subsidiaries may become involved in various legal proceedings and subject to various claims, including for example, employment disputes and litigation; client disputes and litigation alleging solution and implementation defects, personal injury, intellectual property infringement, violations of law and breaches of contract and warranties. In addition, we are a defendant in lawsuits filed in federalwarranties; and state courts brought as putative class or collective actions on behalfother third party disputes and litigation alleging personal injury, intellectual property infringement, violations of various groupslaw, and breaches of currentcontracts and former associates in the U.S. alleging that we misclassified associates as exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws.warranties. All such legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable and, regardless of the merits of the claims, litigation may be expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to our operations and distracting to management. If resolved against us, such legal proceedings could result in excessive verdicts, injunctive relief or other equitable relief that may affect how we operate our business. Similarly, if we settle such legal proceedings, it may affect how we operate our business. Future court decisions, alternative dispute resolution awards, business expansion or legislative activity may increase our exposure to litigation and regulatory investigations. In some cases, substantial non-economic remedies or punitive damages may be sought. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover any particular verdict, judgment or settlement that may be entered against us, that such coverage will prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. If we incur liability that exceeds our insurance coverage or that is not within the scope of the coverage in legal proceedings brought against us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to risks associated with our global operations. We market, sell and support our Solutions and Services globally. We have established offices around the world, including in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia

Pacific region. We plan to continue to expand our non-U.S. operations and enter new global markets. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to develop successful direct and indirect non-U.S. sales and support channels. Our business is generally transacted in the local functional currency. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. There is a risk that we may sometimes choose the wrong partner. For these and other reasons, we may not be able to maintain or increase non-U.S. market demand for our Solutions and Services.

Non-U.S. operations are subject to inherent risks, and our business, results of operations and financial condition, including our revenue growth and profitability, could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors. These include, but are not limited to:

Greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
Difficulties and costs of staffing and managing non-U.S. operations;
The impact of global economic and political market conditions;
Effects of sovereign debt conditions, including budgetary constraints;
Unfavorable or volatile foreign currency exchange rates;
Legal compliance costs or business risks associated with our global operations where: i) local laws and customs differ from, or are more stringent than those in the U.S., such as those relating to data protection and data security, or ii) risk is heightened with respect to laws prohibiting improper payments and bribery, including without limitation

the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Anti-Bribery Act and similar laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions;
Certification, licensing or regulatory requirements and unexpected changes to those requirements;
Changes to or reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries;
Potentially adverse tax consequences as a result of changes in tax laws or otherwise, and difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated or held abroad in a tax-efficient manner;
Different or additional functionality requirements or preferences;
Trade protection measures;
Export control regulations;
Health service provider or government spending patterns or government-imposed austerity measures;
Natural disasters, war or terrorist acts;
Labor disruptions that may occur in a country; orand
Political unrest which may impact sales or threaten the safety of associates or our continued presence in these countries and the related potential impact on global stability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could materially affect our financial results. Our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. In general, the functional currency of our subsidiaries is the local currency.currency where the subsidiary operates. For each subsidiary, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the month of the transaction. Therefore, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against other major currencies affect our revenues, net earnings and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. Future fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies, could materially affect our financial results.

We are subject to tax legislation in numerous countries; changes in tax laws or challenges to our tax positions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are a global corporation with a presence in more than 35 countries. As such, we are subject to tax laws, regulations and policies of the U.S. federal, state and local governments and of comparable taxing authorities in other country jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws, including for example the recently enacted U.S. federal tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("Tax Act"), as well as other factors, could cause us to experience fluctuations in our tax obligations and effective tax rates in 2018 and thereafter and otherwise adversely affect our tax positions and/or our tax liabilities. We are currently evaluatingAlthough our accounting for the effects of the enactment of the Tax Act with our professional advisers.is now complete, there could be additional regulations we may become subject to. The full impact of the Tax Act on us cannot be predicted at this time and may change significantly as regulations, interpretations and rulings relating to the Tax Act are issued and additional changes in U.S. federal and state tax laws may be made in the future. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rates, tax payments, tax credits or incentives will not be adversely affected by these or other initiatives.

In addition, U.S. federal, state and local, as well as other countries' tax laws and regulations, are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations and requires significant judgment in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities. Longstanding international tax norms that determine each country's jurisdiction to tax cross-border

international trade are evolving as a result of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting reporting requirements ("BEPS") recommended by the G8, G20 and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD"). Further, during 2018, the European Commission issued proposals and the OECD issued an interim report related to the taxation of the digital economy. As these and other tax laws and related regulations change, our financial results could be materially impacted. Given the unpredictability of these possible changes and their potential interdependency, it is very difficult to assess the overall effect of such potential tax changes, but such changes could adversely impact our financial results.

In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many intercompany transactions and calculations which could be subject to challenge by tax authorities. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities and those authorities often do not agree with positions taken by us on our tax returns. Our intercompany transfer pricing has been reviewed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and by foreign tax jurisdictions and will likely be subject to additional audits in the future. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would be successful in any such challenge, which could result in additional taxation, penalties and interest payments.

The vote by the United Kingdom (UK) to leave the European Union (EU) could adversely affect our financial results.In June 2016, UK voters approved a referendum to withdraw the UK's membership from the EU, which is commonly referred to as "Brexit". In March 2017, the UK government initiated the exit process under Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union, commencing a period of up to two years for the UK and the other EU member states to negotiate the terms of the withdrawal.withdrawal, such period ending on March 29, 2019 unless extended. There has been limited progress so far in the negotiations and continued uncertainty in the UK government and Parliament, which increases the possibility of the UK exiting the EU on March 29, 2019 without a formal withdrawal agreement in place and of significant market and economic disruption. We have operations in the UK and the EU, and as a result, we face risks associated with the potential uncertainty and disruptions that may lead up to and follow Brexit, including with respect to volatility in exchange rates and interest rates and potential material changes to the regulatory regime applicable to our operations in the UK. Brexit could adversely affect European or worldwide political, regulatory, economic or market conditions and could contribute to instability in global political institutions, regulatory agencies and financial markets. For example, depending on the terms of Brexit, the UK could also lose access to the single EU market and to the global trade deals negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members. Disruptions and uncertainty caused by Brexit may also cause our clients to closely monitor their costs and reduce their spending budget on our Solutions and Services. Any of these effects of Brexit, and others we cannot anticipate or that may evolve over time, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our success depends upon the recruitment and retention of key personnel. To remain competitive in our industries, we must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled managerial, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel, including executives, consultants, programmers and systems architects skilled in the HCIT, health care devices, health care transactions, population health management and revenue cycle industries and the technical environments in which our Solutions and Services are offered. Competition for such personnel in our industries is intense in both the U.S. and abroad. We may also experience increased compensation costs that are not offset by either improved productivity or higher sales.Our failure to attract additional qualified personnel and to retain and motivate existing personnel to meet our needs could have a material adverse effect on our prospects for long-term growth. In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our associates, which increases their value to clients and competitors who may seek to recruit them and increases the cost of replacing them. Our success is dependent to a significant degree on the continued contributions of key management, sales, marketing, consulting and technical personnel. Members of our senior management team have left over the years for a variety of reasons, and we cannot guarantee that there will not be additional departures. The unexpected loss of key personnel, or the failure to successfully develop and execute effective succession planning to assure smooth transitions of those key associates and their knowledge, relationships and expertise, could disrupt our business and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition, and could potentially inhibit development and delivery of our Solutions and Services and market share advances.

We may be subject to harassment or discrimination claims and legal proceedings, and our inability or failure to respond to and effectively manage publicity related to such claims could adversely impact our business. Although our Global Code of Conduct and other employment policies prohibit harassment and discrimination in the workplace, in sexual or in any other form, we have ongoing programs for workplace training and compliance, and we investigate and take disciplinary action with respect to alleged violations, actions by our associates could violate those policies. And, with the increased use of social media platforms, including blogs, chat platforms, social media websites, and other forms of Internet-based communications that allow individuals access to a broad audience, there has been an increase in the speed and accessibility of information dissemination. The dissemination of information via social media, including information about alleged harassment, discrimination or other claims, could harm our business, brand, reputation, financial condition, and results of operations, regardless of the information's accuracy.

We depend on strategic relationships and third party suppliers and our revenue and operating earnings could suffer if we fail to manage these relationships properly. To be successful, we must continue to maintain our existing strategic relationships and establish additional strategic relationships as necessary with leaders in the markets in which we operate. We believe that these relationships contribute to our ability to further build our brand, extend the reach of our Solutions and Services and generate additional revenues and cash flows. If we were to lose critical strategic relationships, this could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We license or purchase certain intellectual property and technology (such as software, services, hardware and content) from third parties, including some competitors, and depend on such third party intellectual property and software, services, hardware orand content in the operation and delivery of our Solutions and Services. Additionally, we sell or license third party intellectual property, services and software, hardware or content in conjunction with our Solutions and Services. For instance, we currently depend on Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Cloudera, Oracle, VMWare and IBM technologies for portions of the operational capabilities of, among others, our Millennium and HealtheIntent solutions. Our remote hosting and cloud services businesses also rely on a limited number of software and services suppliers for certain functions of these businesses, such as Oracle, NetApp, Microsoft, Veritas, CITRIX, GTT and Microsoft database technologies, CITRIX technologies and Cisco technologies.Equinix. Additionally, we rely on Dell Dell/EMC, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, Veritas, HP Inc.,Cisco, NetApp, IBM and others for our hardware technology platforms.

Most of our third party software license support contracts expire within one to five years, can be renewed only by mutual consent and may be terminated if we breach the terms of the license and fail to cure the breach within a specified period of time. Most of these third party software licenses are non-exclusive; therefore, our competitors may obtain the right to use any of the technology covered by these licenses and use the technology to compete directly with us.

If any of our third party suppliers were to change product offerings, cease actively supporting the technologies, fail to update and enhance the technologies to keep pace with changing industry standards, encounter technical difficulties in the continuing development of these technologies, significantly increase prices, change delivery models, terminate our licenses or supply contracts, suffer significant capacity or supply chain constraints or suffer significant disruptions, we may need to seek alternative suppliers and incur additional internal or external development costs to ensure continued performance of our Solutions and Services. Such alternatives may not be available on attractive terms, or may not be as widely accepted or as effective as the intellectual property or technology provided by our existing suppliers. If the cost of licensing, purchasing or maintaining our third party intellectual property or technology significantly increases, our operating earnings could significantly decrease. In addition, interruption in functionality of our Solutions and Services as a result of changes in third party suppliers could adversely affect our commitments to clients, future sales of Solutions and Services, and negatively affect our revenue and operating earnings.

We intend to continue strategic business acquisitions and other combinations, which are subject to inherent risks. In order to expand our Solutions and Services offerings and grow our market and client base, we may continue to seek and complete strategic business acquisitions and other combinations that we believe are complementary to our business. Acquisitions have inherent risks which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects, including, but not limited to: 1) failure to successfully integrate the business, culture and financial operations, services, intellectual property, solutions or personnel of an acquired business and to maintain uniform standard controls, policies, procedures and information systems; 2) diversion of our management’smanagement's attention from other business concerns; 3) management of a larger company and entry into markets in which we have little or no direct prior experience; 4) failure to achieve projected synergies and performance targets; 5) failure to commercialize "go forward" Solutions and

Services under development and increase revenues from existing marketed Solutions and Services; 6) loss of clients, key personnel, supplier, research and development, distribution, marketing, promotion and other important relationships; 7) incurrence of debt or assumption of known and unknown liabilities; 8) write-off of software development costs, goodwill, client lists and amortization of expenses related to intangible assets; 9) dilutive issuances of equity securities; and 10) accounting deficiencies that could arise in connection with, or as a result of, the acquisition of an acquired company, including issues related to internal control over financial reporting and the time and cost associated with remedying such deficiencies.deficiencies; and 11)litigation arising from claims or liabilities assumed from an acquired company or that are otherwise related to acquisition activity, such as claims from former employees, former stockholders or other third parties, all of which could require us to incur significant expenses and cause management distraction. If we fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses or fail to implement our business strategies with respect to these acquisitions, we may not be able to achieve projected results or support the amount of consideration paid for such acquired businesses.


Volatility and disruption resulting from global economic or market conditions could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and outlook may be impacted by the health of the global economy. Volatility and disruption in global capital and credit markets may lead to slowdowns or declines in client spending which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Our business and financial performance, including new business bookings and collection of our accounts receivable, may be adversely affected by current and future economic conditions (including a reduction in the availability of credit, higher energy costs, rising interest rates, financial market volatility and lower than expected economic growth) that cause a slowdown or decline in client spending. Reduced purchases by our clients or changes in payment terms could adversely affect our revenue growth and cause a decrease in our cash flow from operations. Bankruptcies or similar events affecting clients may cause us to incur bad debt expense at levels higher than historically experienced. Further, volatility and disruption in global financial markets may also limit our ability to access the capital markets at a time when we would like, or need, to raise capital, which could have an impact on our ability to react to changing economic and business conditions. Accordingly, if global financial and economic volatility continues or worsens, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We operate in intensely competitive and dynamic industries, and our ability to successfully compete and continue to grow our business depends on our ability to respond quickly to market changes, and changing technologies and evolving pricing and deployment methods and to bring competitive new Solutions and Services and features to market in a timely fashion. The market for health care information systems, Solutions and Services to the health care industry is intensely competitive, dynamically evolving and subject to rapid technological advances and innovative enhancements, changing delivery and pricing models, evolving standards in computer hardware and software development and communications infrastructure, and changing and increasingly sophisticated client needs. Development of new proprietary Solutions or Services is complex, entails significant time and expense, may not be successful and often involves a long return on investment cycle. We cannot guarantee that the market for our Solutions and Services will develop as quickly as expected or at all or that we will be able to introduce new Solutions or Services on schedule or at all. Moreover, we cannot guarantee that errors will not be found in our new Solution releases before or after commercial release, which could result in Solution delivery redevelopment costs, harm to our reputation, lost sales, license terminations or renegotiations, product liability claims, diversion of resources to remedy errors and loss of, or delay in, market acceptance. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position; and oftentimes, successful investments require several years before generating significant revenue.

In addition, we expect that major software information systems companies, highly capitalized consumer technology companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, start-up companies and others specializingoperating in the health care industry may offer competitive Solutions and Services. As we continue to develop new Solutions and Services to address areas such as analytics, transaction services, device integration, revenue cycle and population health management, we expect to face new competitors, and these competitors may have more experience in these markets, better brand recognition and/or more established relationships with prospective clients. We face strong competition and often face downward price pressure, which could adversely affect our results of operations or liquidity. For example, some of our competitors may bundle products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy, commit to large deployments at prices that are unprofitable, or provide guarantees of prices and product implementations. These practices could, over time, significantly constrain the prices that we can charge for certain of our Solutions and Services. If we do not adapt our pricing models to reflect changes in use of our Solutions and Services or changes in client demand, our revenues could decrease.

Additionally, the pace of change in the health care information systems market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution introductions, new deployment models (such as via the cloud), software solution enhancements, device introductions, device enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. We provide our cloud and other offerings to clients globally via deployment models that best suit their needs, including via our cloud-based software as a services (SaaS) offering. As our business models continue to evolve, we may not be able to compete effectively, generate significant revenues or maintain the profitability of our cloud offerings. If we do not successfully execute our strategy or anticipate the needs of our clients, our reputation as a SaaS provider could be harmed and our revenues and profitability could decline. There are a limited number of hospitals and other health care providers in the U.S. market and in recent years, the health care industry has been subject to increasing consolidation. If we are unable to recognize the impact of industry consolidation, falling costs and technological advancements in a timely manner, or we are too inflexible to rapidly adjust our business models, our prospects and financial results could be negatively affected materially.

Our success also depends on our ability to maintain and expand our business with our existing clients and effectively transition existing clients to current Solutions and Services, as well as attracting additional clients. Certain clients originally purchased

one or a limited number of our Solutions and Services. These clients may choose not to expand their use of or purchase additionalnew Solutions and Services. Also, as we develop new applications and features for our existing Solutions and Services

or introduce new Solution and Service offerings, our current clients could choose not to purchase these new offerings. Failure to generate additional business from our current clients could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

If we are unable to manage our growth in the new markets in which we offer Solutions and Services, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer. Our future financial results will depend in part on our ability to profitably manage our business in the new markets that we enter. Over the past several years, we have engaged in the identification of, and competition for,pursued growth and expansion opportunities in the areas of analytics, revenue cycle and population health. In order toTo achieve success in those initiatives,areas, we will need to, among other things, recruit, train, retain and effectively manage associates, manage changing business conditions and implement and improve our technical, administrative, financial control and reporting systems for offerings in those areas. Difficulties in managing future growth in new markets could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Long sales cycles for our Solutions and Services could have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations. Some of our Solutions and Services have long sales cycles, ranging from several months to eighteen months or more beginning at initial contact with the client through execution of a contract. How and when to implement, replace, or expand an information system, or modify, add or outsource business processes, are major decisions for health care organizations. Many of the Solutions and Services we provide require a substantial capital investment and time commitments by the client or prospective client. Any decision by our clients or prospective clients to delay a purchasing decision could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Our work with government clients exposes us to additional risks inherent in the government contracting environment. Our clients include national, provincial, state, local and foreign governmental entities and their agencies. Our government work carries various risks inherent in contracting with such government entities and agencies. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

Government entities, particularly in the U.S., often reserve the right to audit our contracts and conduct inquiries and investigations of our business practices with respect to government contracts. U.S. government agencies conduct reviews and investigations and make inquiries regarding our systems in connection with our performance and business practices with respect to our government contracts. Negative findings from audits, investigations or inquiries could affect our future sales and profitability by preventing us, by operation of law or in practice, from receiving new government contracts for some period of time.

If a government client discovers improper or illegal activities in the course ofduring its audits or investigations, we may become subject to various civil and criminal penalties, including those under the civil U.S. False Claims Act, and administrative sanctions, which may include termination of contracts, suspension of payments, fines and suspensions or debarment from doing business with other agencies of that government. The inherent limitations of internal controls may not prevent or detect all improper or illegal activities.

U.S. government contracting regulations impose strict compliance and disclosure obligations. Disclosure is required if certain company personnel have knowledge of "credible evidence" of a violation of federal criminal laws involving fraud, conflict of interest, bribery or improper gratuity, a violation of the civil U.S. False Claims Act or receipt of a significant overpayment from the government. Failure to make required disclosures could be a basis for suspension and/or debarment from federal government contracting in addition to breach of the specific contract and could also impact contracting beyond the U.S. federal level. Reported matters also could lead to audits or investigations and other civil, criminal or administrative sanctions.

Government contracts are subject to heightened reputational and contractual risks compared to contracts with commercial clients. For example, government contracts and the proceedings surrounding them are often subject to more extensive scrutiny and publicity. Negative publicity, including allegations of improper or illegal activity, poor contract performance, deficiencies in services or other deliverables, or information security breaches, regardless of accuracy, may adversely affect our reputation.

Terms and conditions of government contracts also tend to be more onerous and are often more difficult to negotiate. Because government contracts are subject to specific procurement regulations and a variety of other socio-economic requirements, we must comply with such requirements. We must also comply with various statutes, regulations and requirements related to employment practices, recordkeeping and accounting. These regulations and requirements

affect how we transact business with our clients and suppliers, and in some instances, impose additional costs on our business operations.

Government entities typically fund projects through appropriated monies. While these projects are often planned and executed as multi-year projects, government entities usually reserve the right to change the scope of projects or terminate these projects at their convenience either for lack of approved funding or any other reason. Changes in government or political developments, including budget deficits, shortfalls or uncertainties, government spending reductions (e.g., U.S. Congressional sequestration of funds under the Budget Control Act of 2011) or other debt constraints could result in our projects being reduced in price or scope or terminated altogether, which also could limit our recovery of reimbursable expenses. Furthermore, if insufficient funding is appropriated to the government entity to cover termination costs, we may not be able to fully recover our investments.

Our failure to comply with a variety of complex procurement rules and regulations could result in our being liable for penalties, including termination of our government contracts, disqualification from bidding on future government contracts and suspension or debarment from government contracting. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of government contracts, which affect how we do business with our customers and may impose added costs on our business. Significant statutes and regulations in the U.S. that we must comply with include the Federal Acquisition Regulation and supplements, the Truth in Negotiations Act, the Procurement Integrity Act, and the Civil False Claims Act.

Government contracts may be protested by unsuccessful bidders. These protests could result in administrative procedures and litigation, could be expensive to defend and incapable of prompt resolution. Loss of a bid protest may result in loss of the award, contract modification, expense or delay.

The occurrences or conditions described above could affect not only our business with the particular government entities involved, but also our business with other entities of the same or other governmental bodies or with certain commercial clients and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There are risks associated with our outstanding and future indebtedness. We have customary restrictive covenants in our current debt agreements, which may limit our flexibility to operate our business. These covenants include limitations on priority debt, liens, mergers, asset dispositions, and transactions with affiliates, and require us to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could result in reduced liquidity for the Company and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, our ability to pay interest and repay the principal for our indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations, generate sufficient cash flows to service such debt and the other factors discussed in this section. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage any of these risks successfully.

Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our financial statements. Our financial statements are subject to the application of U.S. GAAP, which is periodically revised and/or expanded. From time to time, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB and the SEC. It is possible that future accounting standards we are required to adopt, such as amended guidance for revenue recognition and leases,lease accounting, may require changes to the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and may require us to make significant changes to our processes and systems. Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements relating to summary of significant accounting policies and recently issued accounting pronouncements for more information. Such changes could result in a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Goodwill and other intangible assets represent approximately 21%19% of our total assets and we could suffer losses due to asset impairment charges. We assess our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment periodically in accordance with applicable authoritative accounting guidance. Declines in business performance or other factors could result in a non-cash impairment charge. This could materially and negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to our Industries

The health care industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences, which could impact the purchasing practices and operations of our clients and increase our costs to deliver compliant Solutions and Services. For example,The last four years have been quite active legislatively with major statutes such as the Health Insurance Portability and AccountabilityProtecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) of 1996 (as modified by The Health Information Technology2014 establishing requirements for Economic and Clinical Health Act ("HITECH") provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of"Appropriate Use Criteria" in ordering high dollar diagnostic

2009) (collectively, "HIPAA") continues to have a direct impact onimaging services, the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 which reformed how physicians are paid under Medicare and which established the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 (Cures Act) which laid the groundwork for nationwide trusted health care industry by requiring national provider identifiersinformation exchange, established interoperability requirements for providers, payers and standardized transactions/code sets, operating rulesconsumers and necessary security and privacy measures in order to ensure the appropriate level of privacy of protected health information. A recent example of these measures was the adoption by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of ICD 10, which set forth new medical diagnosesthe framework for information blocking regulations, and billing codesmost recently the Substance Use Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for reimbursement.Patients and Communities (SUPPORT) Act of 2018 that includes significant policies for addressing the opioid crisis. These regulatory factors affectstatutes are heavily laden with provisions that directly call for or describe roles for the purchasing practices and operationuse of health care organizations.information technology to help providers comply with new federal requirements under Medicare and for state Medicaid programs.

Many health care providers are consolidating to create integrated health care delivery systems with greater market power. These providers may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for our Solutions and Services. As the health care industry consolidates, our client base could be consolidated with fewer buyers, competition for clients could become more intense and the importance of landing new client relationships becomes greater.

Reform of payment policies for Medicare and Medicaid continues to evolve. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the "ACA"), which was amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, became law in 2010. This2010; this comprehensive health care reform legislation included provisions to introduce value basedintroduced value-based principles into federal health insurance payments systems, sought to improve health care quality, and expandexpanded access to affordable health insurance. Subsequent federal legislation including the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 and the Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015MACRA built upon the value based policies introduced by the ACA. Particularly in the case of MACRA which served to restructure physician payment under the Medicare program,These legislative initiatives accelerated the adoption of "Alternative Payment Models" or APMs accelerated as bundled payment models based on episodes of care or per capita payment for defined populations emerged as alternatives to traditional fee for service payments to providers. Subsequent legislative, regulatory and judicial developments have created uncertainty for providers.the continued implementation of the ACA and other health care-related legislation and, to the extent that implementation continues, the way in which they are implemented. Examples include the Medicare Shared Savings Program for Accountable Care Organizations and the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement - Advanced model program under the Innovation Center of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) which focuses on episode-based payment for hospital and ambulatory services. Together with ongoing statutory and budgetary policy developments at a federal level, the collective impact of this health care reform legislation could include changes in Medicare and Medicaid payment policies and other health care delivery administrative reforms that could potentially negatively impact our business and the business of our clients. The actions taken by the Trump Administration and Congress to slow down, moderate and in some cases, roll back regulatory initiatives of the prior Administration during 2017 have created uncertainty for the continued implementation of the ACA and other health care-related legislation. Because of that uncertainty because some administrative rules implementing health care reform under current legislation have been moderated or reversed, and because of ongoing federal fiscal budgetary pressures yet to be resolved for federal health programs, we cannot predict the full effect of health care legislation on our business at this time. There can be no assurances that theThe direction and pace of health care reform initiatives will notmay adversely impact either our operational results or the manner in whichway we operate our business,including changes to existing regulatory oversight that have uncertain effect on operating expenses and compliance risks. While federalbusiness. Federal health insurance programs still routinely require adoption of certified HCIT as a program requirement or prerequisite, theand we anticipate future adoption of new requirementscertification requirements. But we also anticipate possible significant impacts from information blocking provisions of the Cures Act and expanded surveillance by federal agencies of both certified HCIT and its use by our clients. CMS has also mandated updates to the electronic prescribing standards and adoption of controlled substance electronic prescribing by hospitals in response to the opioid crisis which may slow.drive upgrades of existing HCIT investments by hospitals and physicians rather than seeking replacement. In response to this uncertainty, purchasers of HCIT may reduce their investments or postpone investment decisions, including investments in our Solutions and Services. Future legislation and regulation may ultimately impact the fiscal stability and sustainability of HCIT purchasers. A lowering or slowingDifferences in demand inrelated to new regulatory requirements and/or near-term compliance deadlines that contribute to demand for our Solutions and Services could impact our financial results. There can be no certainty that incentives will be offered in regard to our Solutions and Services, nor can there be any assurance that any legislation that may be adopted wouldwill be favorable to our business. We cannot predict whether or when future health care reform initiatives at the federal or state level or other initiatives affecting our business will be proposed, enacted or implemented or what impact those initiatives may have on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The health care industry is highly regulated, and thus, we are subject to a number ofseveral laws, regulations and industry initiatives, non-compliance with certain of which could materially adversely affect our operations or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. As a participant in the health care industry, our operations and relationships, and those of our clients, are regulated by a number ofseveral U.S. federal, state, local and foreign governmental entities. The impact of these regulations on us is both direct, to the extent that we are ourselves subject to these laws and regulations, and is also indirect, both in terms of the level of government reimbursement availableprogram requirements applicable to our clients for the use of HCIT and because, in a number of situations, even though we may not be directly regulated by specific health care laws and regulations, our Solutions and Services must be capable of being used by our clients in a way that complies with those laws and regulations. There is a significant and wide-ranging number of regulations both within the U.S. and abroad, such as regulations in the areas of health care fraud, information blocking, e-prescribing, claims processing and transmission, health care devices, the security and privacy of patient data and interoperability standards, that may be directly or indirectly applicable to our operations and relationships or the business practices of our clients. Specific risks include, but are not limited to, the following:


Health Care Fraud. U.S. federal and state governments continue to enhance regulation of and increase their scrutiny over practices involving health care fraud, waste and abuse perpetuated by health care providers and professionals whose services are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and other government health care programs. Our health care provider clients, as well as our provision of Solutions and Services to government entities, subject our business to laws and regulations on fraud and abuse which, among other things, prohibit the direct or indirect payment or receipt of any remuneration for patient referrals,

or arranging for or recommending referrals or other business paid for in whole or in part by these federal or state health care programs. U.S. federal enforcement personnel have substantial funding, powers and remedies to pursue suspected or perceived fraud and abuse. The effect of this government regulation on our clients is difficult to predict. Many of the regulations applicable to our clients and that may be applicable to us, including those relating to marketing incentives offered in connection with health care device sales and information blocking, are vague or indefinite and have not been interpreted by the courts. They may be interpreted or applied by a prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authority in a manner that could broaden their applicability to us or require our clients to make changes in their operations or the way in which they deal with us. If such laws and regulations are determined to be applicable to us and if we fail to comply with any applicable laws and regulations, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties, sanctions or other liability, including exclusion from government health programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even an unsuccessful challenge by a regulatory or prosecutorial authority of our activities could result in adverse publicity, require a costly response from us and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Preparation, Transmission, Submission and Collection of Medical Claims for Reimbursement. Our Solutions and Services are capable of electronically transmitting claims for services and items rendered by a physician to many patients' payers for approval and reimbursement. We also provide revenue cycle management services to our clients that include the coding, preparation, submission and collection of claims for medical service to payers for reimbursement. Such claims are governed by U.S. federal and state laws. U.S. federal law provides civil liability to any persons that knowingly submit, or cause to be submitted, a claim to a payer, including Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans, seeking payment for any services or items that overbills or bills for services or items that have not been provided to the patient. U.S. federal law may also impose criminal penalties for intentionally submitting such false claims. In addition, federal and state law regulates the collection of debt and may impose monetary penalties for violating those regulations. We have policies and procedures in place that we believe result in the accurate and complete preparation, transmission, submission and collection of claims, provided that the information given to us by our clients is also accurate and complete. The HIPAA security, privacy and transaction standards, as discussed below, also have a potentially significant effect on our claims preparation, transmission and submission services, since those services must be structured and provided in a way that supports our clients' HIPAA compliance obligations. In connection with these laws, we may be subjected to U.S. federal or state government investigations and possible penalties may be imposed upon us; false claims actions may have to be defended; private payers may file claims against us; and we may be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other government-funded health care programs. Any investigation or proceeding related to these laws, even if unwarranted or without merit, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Regulation of Health Care Devices. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") has determined that certain of our Solutions and Services are medical devices that are actively regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ("Act") and amendments to the Act. Other countries have similar regulations in place related to medical devices, that now or may in the future apply to certain of our Solutions and Services. If other of our Solutions and Services are deemed to be actively regulated medical devices by the FDA or similar regulatory agencies in countries where we do business, we could be subject to extensive requirements governing pre- and post-marketing activities including pre-market notification clearance. Complying with these medical device regulations globally is time consuming and expensive and could be subject to unanticipated and significant delays. Further, it is possible that these regulatory agencies may become more active in regulating software and devices that are used in health care. If we are unable to obtain the required regulatory approvals for any such Solutions and Services, our shortshort- and long termlong-term business plans for these Solutions and Services could be delayed or canceled.

There have been nine FDA inspections at various Cerner sites since 2003. Inspections conducted at our Headquarters Campus, and Realization Campus (formerly known as ourand Innovations Campus)Campus in 2010 and 2017 resulted in the issuance of an FDA Form 483 observation to which we responded promptly. The FDA has taken no further action with respect to the Form 483 observations that were issued in 2010 and 2017. The remaining FDA inspections, including inspections at our Headquarters Campuscampuses in 2006, 2007 and 2014, resulted in no issuance of a Form 483. We remain subject to periodic FDA inspections and we could be required to undertake additional actions to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to manufacture, distribute and deliver our Solutions and Services. The FDA has many enforcement tools including recalls, productdevice corrections, seizures, injunctions, refusal to grant pre-market clearance of products, civil fines and criminal

prosecutions. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Security and Privacy. U.S. federal, state and local and foreign laws regulate the confidentiality of personal information, how that information may be used, and the circumstances under which such information may be released. These regulations

govern both the disclosure and use of confidential personal and patient medical record information and require the users of such information to implement specified security and privacy measures. U.S. regulations currently in place governing electronic health data transmissions continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply. Laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions are also evolving and may have similar or even stricter requirements related to the treatment of personal or patient information.

In the U.S., HIPAA regulations apply national standards for some types of electronic health information transactions and the data elements used in those transactions to ensure the integrity, security and confidentiality of health information and standards to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. Covered entities under HIPAA, which include health care organizations such as our clients, our employer clinic business and our claims processing, transmission and submission services, are required to comply with HIPAA privacy standards, transaction regulations and security regulations. Moreover, the HITECH provisions of ARRA,the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA"), and associated regulatory requirements, extend many of the HIPAA obligations, formerly imposed only upon covered entities, to business associates as well. As a business associate of our clients who are covered entities, we were in most instances already contractually required to comply with the HIPAA regulations as they pertain to handling of covered client data. However, the extension of these HIPAA obligations to business associates by law has created additional liability risks related to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information.

Evolving HIPAA and HITECH-related laws and regulations in the U.S. and data privacy and security laws and regulations in non-U.S. jurisdictions could restrict the ability of our clients to obtain, use or disseminate patient information. This could adversely affect demand for our Solutions and Services if they are not re-designed in a timely manner in order to meet the requirements of any new interpretations or regulations that seek to protect the privacy and security of patient data or enable our clients to execute new or modified health care transactions. We may need to expend additional capital, software development and other resources to modify our Solutions and Services to address these evolving data security and privacy issues. Furthermore, our failure to maintain confidentiality of sensitive personal information in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements could damage our reputation and expose us to claims, fines and penalties.

In Europe, we are subject to EU and national data protection legislation, including the 19952016 General Data Protection Directive,Regulation ("GDPR") which requires member states to impose minimumimposes restrictions on the collection and useprocessing of personal data (including health data) that, in some respects, are more stringent, and impose more significant burdens on subject businesses, than current privacy standards in the U.S. The EU directives establishregulation establishes several obligations that organizations must follow with respect to use of personal data, including a prohibition on the transfer of personal information from the EU to other countries whose laws do not adequately protect the privacy and security of personal data to European standards. In addition to this EU-wide legislation, certain member states have adopted more stringent data protection standards.standards, particularly for health data. We have addressed these requirements, relative to data transfers, by self-certifying our compliance with the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to the U.S. Department of Commerce International Trade Administration ("ITA"). The ITA has approved our self-certification. However, continued criticism of the Privacy Shield by officials in Europe casts uncertainty as to the long-term effectiveness of the Privacy Shield to support EU-U.S. transfers of personal data. For that reason, we are also pursuing alternative methods of compliance (e.g. Standard Contractual Clauses), but those methods also may be subject to scrutiny by data protection authorities in European member states.

On April 14, 2016, the European Parliament approved the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), which replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive and becomes enforceable on May 24, 2018. The GDPR will have significant impacts on how businesses, including both us and our clients, can collect and process the personal data of EU individuals. We may incur increasedhave incurred development costs and delays in delivering Solutions and Services as we need to update our Solutions and Services to enable our European clients to comply with these varying and evolving standards to the extent that they differ from the standards of the previous 1995 Data Protection Directive. In addition, delays in interpreting the GDPR's standards may result in postponement or cancellation of our clients' decisions to purchase our Solutions and Services.standards. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws, regulations and policies, or modifications thereto, that are applicable to us may limit the use and adoption of our Solutions and Services and could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Both the 1995 Data Protection Directive and theThe GDPR grantgrants broad enforcement powers to regulatory agencies to investigate and enforce our compliance with their data privacy and security requirements. Governmental enforcement personnel, particularly in the EU, have substantial funding, powers and remedies to pursue suspected or perceived violations. If we fail to comply with any applicable laws or regulations or fail to deliver compliant Solutions and Services, we could be subject to civil penalties, sanctions or contract liability. Enforcement investigations, even if meritless, could have a negative impact on our reputation, cause us to lose existing clients or limit our ability to attract new clients.

Interoperability Standards. Our clients arecontinue to be concerned with and often require that our Solutions and Services be interoperable with other third party HCIT suppliers. Market forces orand governmental/regulatory authorities could create software

interoperability standards that wouldmay apply to our Solutions and Services, and ifServices. If our Solutions and Services are not consistent with those standards, we could be forced to incur substantial additional development costs to conform. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged under the Cures Act with developing a Trusted Exchange Framework that establishes governance requirements for trusted health information exchange in the U.S. ONC has developed a comprehensive set of criteriathe U.S. Common Data Set for Interoperability which may lay the functionality, interoperability and security of various software modules in the HCIT industry.groundwork for future data exchange requirements for trusted exchange. ONC however, continues to modify and refine thosethese standards. Achieving certification is becoming a competitive requirement. We may incur increased software development and administrative expense and delays in delivering Solutions and Services if we need to update our Solutions and Services to conform to these varying and evolving requirements. In addition, delays in interpreting these standards may result in postponement or cancellation of our clients' decisions to purchase our Solutions and Services. If our Solutions and Services are not compliant with these evolving standards, our market position and sales could be impaired, and we may have to invest significantly in changes to our Solutions and Services.

Federal Requirements for Certified Health Information Technology. Various U.S. federal, state and non-government agencies continue to generate requirements for the use of information technology. In many cases, these requirements have become conditions for receiving payment for health care services to beneficiaries of federal health insurance programs. These requirements are expansions of the statutory ARRA HITECH program that began providing incentive payments in 2011 to hospitals and eligible providers for the "meaningful use of certified electronic health record technology ("CEHRT")." Although those incentive programs have expired, CEHRT continues to be a condition of participation in federal health care programs. In 2015, MACRA required the use of CEHRT as part of its Quality Payment Program for eligible providers under Medicare. CEHRT is also one of the areas measured under the Merit based Incentive Payment System (known as MIPS) by which the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule was restructured. In the last twoseveral years, participation in Medicare's "alternative payment models" to replace traditional "fee for service" payments with quality and risk-sharing payment models has been conditioned on CEHRT. Adopted in 2016,CEHRT and this continues with the 21st CenturyTrump Administration. The Cures Act has tied CEHRT to its policy goals of reducing barriers to the exchange of health information data blocking, encouraging nationwide interoperability, consumer access to health information and improving health information availability between consumers and their care teams. The regulations establishing the certification standards for CEHRT will continue to be updated to support these policy goals with greater emphasis on interoperability, consumer engagement, patient safety and health information privacy and security. The ONC is due to develop additional regulations under the 21st Century Cures Act to enforce the act’s policy directives relating to data blocking and interoperability. In addition, the ONC has increased its surveillance activities concerning vendor compliance relative to CEHRT.

We are completing ourhave completed certification efforts to meet current CEHRT requirements as they becomethat became mandatory for certain Federal programs on January 1, 2019, and wefor many others that become mandatory during 2019. We will continue to address additional regulatory requirements as they evolve. However, these standards and specifications are subject to interpretation by the entities designated to certify our electronic health care technology as CEHRT compliant. Because the modifications to the federal Medicare regulations have slowed or moderated requirements for adoption of CEHRT, our clients' decision to purchase our Solutions and Services to achieve compliance with these regulations may be postponed or canceled, which could have an adverse impact on our sales. Additionally, if our business practices, Solutions and Services are not compliant with these evolving regulatory requirements, our market position and sales could be impaired, and we may have to invest significantly in changes to our Solutions and Services. Further, we bear potential financial risks where we are alleged to have not appropriately complied with these regulations. We also bear financial risk where we have entered into agreements with clients to warrant their ability to meet future federal program requirements that require use of CEHRT. While a client's ability to meet future federal health program related attestation requirements may be dependent on the client's ability to adopt, rollout and attain sufficient use of our certified Solutions and Services on a timely basis, we may face risks that come from issues in full adoption of our certified Solutions and Services, which in turn could lead to a client missing its attestation targets. These risks are enhanced when we are under agreements to provide application management services to our clients that place responsibilities on us for application configuration and implementation as a prerequisite to meaningful use attainment ordinarily borne by the client.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our quarterly operating results may vary, which could adversely affect our stock price. Our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in future periods, including variations from guidance, expectations or historical results or trends. Quarterly operating results may vary for a number of reasons including demand for our Solutions and Services, the financial condition of our current and potential clients, our long sales cycle, potentially long installation and implementation cycles for larger, more complex systems, accounting policy changes and other factors described in this section and elsewhere in this report. As a result of health care industry trends and the market for our Solutions and Services, a large percentage of our revenues are generated by the sale and installation of larger, more complex and higher-priced

systems. The sales process for these systems is lengthy and involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources by the client. Sales may be subject to delays due to changes in clients' internal budgets, procedures for approving large capital expenditures, competing needs for other capital expenditures, additions or amendments to U.S. federal, state or local regulations, availability of personnel resources or by actions taken by competitors. Delays in the expected

sale, installation or implementation of these large systems may have a significant negative impact on our anticipated quarterly revenues and consequently our earnings, since a significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed. Because of the complexity and value of our contracts, the loss of even a small number of clients could have a significant negative effect on our financial results.

Revenue recognized in any quarter may depend upon our or our clients' abilities to meet project milestones. Delays in meeting these milestone conditions or modification of the project plan could result in a shift of revenue recognition from one quarter to another and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for a particular quarter.

OurWe may also experience seasonality in revenues. For example, our revenues from system sales historically have been lower in the first quarter of the year and greater in the fourth quarter of the year, primarily as a result of clients' year-end efforts to make final capital expenditures for the then-current year. These seasonal variations may lead to fluctuations in our annual and quarterly revenues and operating results.

Our sales forecasts may vary from actual sales in a particular quarter. We use a "pipeline" system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our business. Our sales associates monitor the status of all sales opportunities, such as the date when they estimate that a client will make a purchase decision and the potential dollar amount of the sale. These estimates are aggregated periodically to generate a sales pipeline. We compare this pipeline at various points in time to evaluate trends in our business. This analysis provides guidance in business planning and forecasting, but these pipeline estimates are by their nature speculative. Our pipeline estimates are not necessarily reliable predictors of revenues in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time, partially because of changes in the pipeline and in conversion rates of the pipeline into contracts that can be very difficult to estimate. A negative variation in the expected conversion rate or timing of the pipeline into contracts, or in the pipeline itself, could cause our plan or forecast to be inaccurate and thereby adversely affect business results. For example, a slowdown in information technology spending, adverse economic conditions, new or changed U.S. federal, state or local regulations related to our industry or a variety of other factors can cause purchasing decisions to be delayed, reduced in amount or cancelled, which would reduce the overall pipeline conversion rate in a particular period of time. Because a substantial portion of our contracts are completed in the latter part of a quarter, we may not be able to adjust our cost structure quickly enough in response to a revenue shortfall resulting from a decrease in our pipeline conversion rate in any given fiscal quarter.

The trading price of our common stock may be volatile. The market for our common stock may experience significant price and volume fluctuations in response to a number of factors including actual or anticipated variations in operating results, articles or rumors about our performance or Solutions and Services, announcements of technological innovations or new services or products by our competitors or us, changes in expectations of future financial performance or estimates of securities analysts, governmental regulatory action, health care reform measures, client relationship developments, economic conditions and changes occurring in the securities markets in general and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. For instance, our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in future periods, due to a number of reasons including, but not limited to, demand for our Solutions and Services, the financial condition of our current and potential clients, our long sales cycle, potentially long installation and implementation cycles for larger, more complex and higher-priced systems, key management changes, accounting policy changes and other factors described herein. As a matter of policy, we do not generally comment on our stock price or rumors.

Furthermore, the stock market in general, and the markets for software, health care devices, other health care solutions and services and information technology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of actual operating performance.

We cannot guarantee that our stock repurchase program or our quarterly dividend program will be fully implemented or that either will enhance long-term stockholder value. Our Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase program totaling $1.0 billion, of which $283 million remains available for purchase at the end of 2018. The repurchase program does not have an expiration date and we are not obligated to repurchase a specified number or dollar value of shares. Additionally, our Board has approved the initiation of a quarterly cash dividend program and while we expect to pay a cash dividend on a quarterly basis, future declarations of such quarterly cash dividends are subject to approval by the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors' determination that the declaration of dividends are in the best interests of Cerner and its shareholders.

Either or both of our repurchase or dividend programs may be suspended or terminated at any time and, even if fully implemented, may not enhance long-term stockholder value.

Our Directors have authority to issue preferred stock and our corporate governance documents contain anti-takeover provisions. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the preferences, rights and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of common stock may be harmed by rights granted to the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future and issuances of preferred stock could be used to delay or hinder a change of control of the Company.

In addition, some provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock or otherwise effect a change of control of the Company. These include provisions that provide for a classified board of directors, require advance notice of stockholder proposals at stockholder meetings, prohibit shareholders from taking action by written consent and restrict the ability of shareholders to call special meetings. We are also subject to provisions of Delaware law that prohibit us from engaging in any business combination with any interested shareholder for a period of three years from the date the person became an interested shareholder, unless certain conditions are met, which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.

Risks Relating to Forward-looking Statements

Statements made in this report, the Annual Report to Shareholders of which this report is made a part, other reports and proxy statements filed with the SEC, communications to shareholders, press releases and oral statements made by representatives of the Company that are not historical in nature, or that state the Company's or management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, plans, goals or predictions of future events or performance, may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "could," "should," "will," "intended," "continue," "believe," "may," "expect," "hope," "anticipate," "goal," "forecast," "plan," "guidance," "opportunity," "prospects" or "estimate" or the negative of these words, variations thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note that any such performance and actual results, financial condition or business, could differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere herein or in other reports filed with the SEC. Other unforeseen factors not identified herein could also have such an effect. Any forward-looking statements made in this report speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in our business, results of operations, financial condition or business over time.

Market and Industry Data

This Annual Report on Form 10-K containsmay contain market, industry and government data and forecasts that have been obtained from publicly available information, various industry publications and other published industry sources. We have not independently verified the information and cannot make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. None of the reports and other materials of third party sources referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were prepared for use in, or in connection with, this Annual Report.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff CommentsComments.

None


Item 2. PropertiesProperties.

As of the end of 2017,2018, we owned approximately six million gross square feet of real estate located in the greater Kansas City metro area and Malvern, Pennsylvania. Such property primarily consists of office space, data center, and warehouse facilities used primarily by our Domestic Segment.

As of the end of 2017,2018, we leased additional space used primarily by our Domestic Segment in the following locations:
Ÿ Arlington, Virginia
Ÿ Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Ÿ New Concord, Ohio
Ÿ Brooklyn, New York
Ÿ Durham, North CarolinaFranklin, Tennessee
Ÿ New York, New York
Ÿ Burlington, VermontBrooklyn, New York
Ÿ Franklin, TennesseeJefferson City, Missouri
Ÿ North Kansas City, Missouri
Ÿ Carlsbad, California
Ÿ Kansas City, Missouri
Ÿ Rochester, Minnesota
Ÿ Colchester, Vermont
Ÿ Lakeland, Florida
Ÿ Salt Lake City, Utah
Ÿ Columbia, Missouri
Ÿ Mason, Ohio
Ÿ Salt Lake City, UtahTempe, Arizona
Ÿ Costa Mesa, California
Ÿ Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ÿ Tempe, ArizonaWaltham, Massachusetts
Ÿ Denver, Colorado
Ÿ Nevada, Missouri
Ÿ Waltham, MassachusettsDurham, North Carolina
Ÿ New Concord, Ohio

We also leased space primarily used by our Global Segment in the following locations:
Ÿ Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Ÿ Gmund, Austria
Ÿ Paris, France
Ÿ Augsburg, Germany
Ÿ Gothenburg, Sweden
Ÿ Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaOslo, Norway
Ÿ Bangalore, India
Ÿ Hamburg, Germany
Ÿ Sao Paulo, BrazilPalma de Mallorca, Spain
Ÿ Berlin, Germany
Ÿ Idstein, Germany
Ÿ SingaporeParis, France
Ÿ Brasov, Romania
Ÿ Kolkata, India
Ÿ St. Wolfgang, GermanyRiyadh, Saudi Arabia
Ÿ Brisbane, Australia
Ÿ Kosice, SlovakiaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Ÿ Stockholm, SwedenSao Paulo, Brazil
Ÿ Cairo, Egypt
Ÿ Lisbon, PortugalLas Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain
Ÿ Sydney, AustraliaSingapore
Ÿ Doha, Qatar
Ÿ London, EnglandLisbon, Portugal
Ÿ The Hague, NetherlandsSt. Wolfgang, Germany
Ÿ Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Ÿ Madrid, SpainLondon, England
Ÿ Toronto, Ontario, CanadaStockholm, Sweden
Ÿ Dublin, Ireland
Ÿ Melbourne,Lund, Sweden
Ÿ Sydney, Australia
Ÿ Erlangen, Germany
Ÿ Madrid, Spain
Ÿ The Hague, Netherlands
Ÿ Essen, Germany
Ÿ Markham, Ontario, Canada
Ÿ Vienna, Austria
Ÿ Erlangen, GermanyGmund, Austria
Ÿ Oslo, Norway
Ÿ Essen, Germany
Ÿ Palma De Mallorca, SpainMelbourne, Australia
 

In general, we believe our facilities are suitable to meet our current and reasonably anticipated future needs.

Item 3. Legal ProceedingsProceedings.

From time to time, we are involved in litigation which is incidental to our business. In our opinion, no litigation to which we are currently a party is likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
Item 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresDisclosures.

Not applicable

Part IIII.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select MarketSM under the symbol CERN. The following table sets forth the high, low and last sales prices for the fiscal quarters of 20172018 and 20162017 as reported by the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market.
2017 20162018 2017
                      
High Low Last High Low LastHigh Low Last High Low Last
                      
First Quarter$59.83
 $47.09
 $58.85
 $59.92
 $49.59
 $54.08
$73.43
 $56.49
 $58.00
 $59.83
 $47.09
 $58.85
Second Quarter69.28
 58.09
 66.47
 59.14
 52.84
 58.91
63.22
 52.05
 59.79
 69.28
 58.09
 66.47
Third Quarter72.27
 61.53
 71.32
 67.50
 57.59
 61.75
67.57
 59.49
 64.41
 72.27
 61.53
 71.32
Fourth Quarter73.86
 62.86
 67.39
 62.53
 47.01
 47.37
65.44
 48.78
 52.01
 73.86
 62.86
 67.39

At February 1, 2018,January 28, 2019, there were approximately 960940 owners of record. To date, we have paid no cash dividends and we do not intenddividends. Subject to paydeclaration by the Board of Directors, the Company plans to initiate a quarterly cash dividendsdividend of $0.15 per share, with the first payment expected in the foreseeable future. We believe it is inthird quarter of 2019. Future dividends will be subject to the shareholders' best interest for us to reinvest funds in the operationdetermination, declaration and discretion of the business.Board of Directors and compliance with our covenants under our credit facility.

The following table below provides information with respect to Common Stock repurchasespurchases by the Company during the fourth fiscal quarter of 20172018:
  Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (b) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (b)
Period    
October 1, 2017 - October 28, 2017 
 $
 
 $576,618,633
October 29, 2017 - November 25, 2017 2,290,877
 65.48
 2,290,754
 426,618,689
November 26, 2017 - December 30, 2017 5,874
 70.69
 
 426,618,689
Total 2,296,751
 $65.49
 2,290,754
  
  Total Number of Shares Purchased (a) Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (b) Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (b)
Period    
September 30, 2018 - October 27, 2018 
 $
 
 $581,522,399
October 28, 2018 - November 24, 2018 1,722,734
 58.05
 1,722,124
 481,556,844
November 25, 2018 - December 29, 2018 3,745,917
 52.96
 3,745,917
 283,172,767
Total 5,468,651
 $54.56
 5,468,041
  

(a)Of the 2,296,7515,468,651 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, presented in the table above, 5,997610 shares were originally granted to employees as restricted stock pursuant to our 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Plan"). The Omnibus Plan allows for the withholding of shares to satisfy the minimum tax obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock. Pursuant to the Omnibus Plan, the 5,997610 shares reflected above were relinquished by employees in exchange for our agreement to pay U.S. federal and state withholding obligations resulting from the vesting of the Company’sCompany's restricted stock.
(b)As announced on November 14, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program that allowed the Company to repurchase up to $500 million of shares of our common stock, excluding transaction costs. That program was completed in November 2017. As announced on May 25, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to $500 million of shares of our common stock, excluding transaction costs. As announced on May 21, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the repurchase program that was authorized in May 2017. Under the amendment, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of shares of our common stock, for an aggregate of $1 billion, excluding transaction costs. The repurchases are to be effectuated in the open market, by block purchase, in privately negotiated transactions, or through other transactions managed by broker-dealers. No time limit was set for the completion of the current program. During 2017,2018, we repurchased 2.711.2 million shares for total consideration of $173$644 million under these programsthe program pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. At December 30, 2017, $42729, 2018, $283 million remains available for repurchase under the outstanding program. Refer to Note (14) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our share repurchase programs.program.

See Part III, Item 12 for information relating to securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

Item 6. Selected Financial DataData.
(In thousands, except per share data)
2017(1)
 2016 
2015(2)
 2014 
2013(3)
2018(1)
 
2017(2)
 2016 
2015(3)
 2014
                  
Statement of Operations Data:                  
Revenues$5,142,272
 $4,796,473
 $4,425,267
 $3,402,703
 $2,910,748
$5,366,325
 $5,142,272
 $4,796,473
 $4,425,267
 $3,402,703
Operating earnings960,471
 911,013
 781,136
 763,084
 576,012
774,785
 960,471
 911,013
 781,136
 763,084
Earnings before income taxes967,129
 918,434
 781,380
 774,174
 588,054
800,851
 967,129
 918,434
 781,380
 774,174
Net earnings866,978
 636,484
 539,362
 525,433
 398,354
630,059
 866,978
 636,484
 539,362
 525,433
                  
Earnings per share:                  
Basic2.62
 1.88
 1.57
 1.54
 1.16
1.91
 2.62
 1.88
 1.57
 1.54
Diluted2.57
 1.85
 1.54
 1.50
 1.13
1.89
 2.57
 1.85
 1.54
 1.50
                  
Weighted average shares outstanding:                  
Basic331,373
 337,740
 343,178
 342,150
 343,636
330,084
 331,373
 337,740
 343,178
 342,150
Diluted337,999
 343,653
 350,908
 350,386
 352,281
333,572
 337,999
 343,653
 350,908
 350,386
                  
Balance Sheet Data:                  
Working capital$1,590,632
 $773,960
 $1,049,967
 $1,714,471
 $1,121,276
$1,356,114
 $1,590,632
 $773,960
 $1,049,967
 $1,714,471
Total assets6,469,311
 5,629,963
 5,561,984
 4,530,565
 4,098,364
6,708,636
 6,469,311
 5,629,963
 5,561,984
 4,530,565
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excl. current installments515,130
 537,552
 563,353
 62,868
 111,717
438,802
 515,130
 537,552
 563,353
 62,868
Shareholders' equity4,785,348
 3,927,947
 3,870,384
 3,565,968
 3,167,664
4,928,389
 4,785,348
 3,927,947
 3,870,384
 3,565,968

(1)In 2018, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance as further discussed in Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

(2)Includes the impact of certain U.S. income tax reform, as further described in Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

(2)(3)In 2015, we acquired Siemensour Health Services as further described in Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

(3)Includes a pre-tax settlement charge of $106 million.business from Siemens AG.


Item 7. Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations.

The following Management Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements ("Notes").statements.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. Fiscal years 20172018, 20162017 and 20152016 each consisted of 52 weeks and ended on December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 2016,30, 2017, and January 2,December 31, 2016, respectively. All references to years in this MD&A represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted.

Management Overview

Our revenues are primarily derived by selling, implementing and supporting software solutions, clinical content, hardware, devices and services that give health care providers and other stakeholders secure access to clinical, administrative and financial data in real or near-real time, helping them to improve quality, safety and efficiency in the delivery of health care.

Our fundamental strategic focuscore strategy is the creation ofto create organic growth by investing in research and development ("R&D") to create solutions and tech enabled services for the health care industry. This strategy has driven strong growth over the long-term, as reflected in five- and ten-year compound annual revenue growth rates of 14%13% and 13%12%, respectively. This growth has also created an important strategic footprint in health care, with Cerner® solutions in more than 27,00027,500 contracted provider facilities worldwide, including hospitals, physician practices, laboratories, ambulatory centers, behavioral health centers, cardiac facilities, radiology clinics, surgery centers, extended care facilities, retail pharmacies, and employer sites. Selling additional solutions and services back into this client base is an important element of our future revenue growth. We are also focused on driving growth through market share expansion by strategically aligning with health care providers that have not yet selected a supplier and by displacing competitors in health care settings that are looking to replace their current supplier.suppliers. We may also supplement organic growth with acquisitions or strategic investments.

We expect to drive growth through solutions and tech-enabled services that reflect our ongoing ability to innovate and expand our reach into health care. Examples of these include our CareAware® health care device architecture and devices, Cerner ITWorksSM services, revenue cycle solutions and services, and HealtheIntent® population health solutions and services. Finally, we continue to believe there is significant opportunity for growth outside of the United States, with many non-U.S. markets focused on health care information technology as part of their strategy to improve the quality and lower the cost of health care.

Beyond our strategy for driving revenue growth, we are also focused on earnings growth. Similar to our history of growing revenue, our net earnings have increased at compound annual rates of 17%10% and 21%, respectively,13% over the most recent five- and ten-year periods.periods, respectively. We expect to drive earnings growth as we continue to grow our revenue. We also have opportunities to expand our operating margins over time. In the near term, we expect growth in non-cash expenses, such as amortization and depreciation, and a mix of lower margin revenue associated with some of our rapidly growing services businesses will limit our margin expansion. Longer-term, we expect to generate margin expansion as the growth rate of non-cash expenses slows, we achieve economies of scale and efficiencies in our services businesses, control general and administrative expenses, and get more contributions to our growth from solutions on our HealtheIntent platform, which we expect to be accretive to our overall margins.

We are also focused on continuing to deliver strong levels of cash flow, which we expect to accomplish by continuing to grow earnings and prudently managing capital expenditures.

Siemens Health Services

On February 2, 2015, we acquired the Cerner Health Services business, as further described in Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The addition of this business impacts the comparability of our 2015 consolidated financial statements in relation to the comparative periods presented herein.

Results Overview

The Company delivered strong levels of bookings, revenues, earnings and operating cash flows in 2017.

Bookings, which reflects the value of executed contracts for software, hardware, professional services and managed services, was $6.3$6.72 billion in 2017,2018, which is an increase of 16%6% compared to $5.4$6.32 billion in 2016.2017.

Revenues for 20172018 increased 7%4% to $5.1$5.37 billion, compared to $4.8$5.14 billion in 2016.2017. The increase in revenue reflects ongoing demand from new and existing clients for Cerner's solutions and services driven by their needs to keep up with regulatory requirements, adapt to changing reimbursement models, and deliver safer and more efficient care.

Net earnings for 2017 increased 36%2018 decreased 27% to $630 million, compared to $867 million compared to $636 million in 2016.2017. Diluted earnings per share increased 39%decreased 26% to $1.89 in 2018, compared to $2.57 in 2017, compared to $1.85 in 2016.2017. The overall increasedecrease in net earnings and diluted earnings per share was

primarily a result of increased revenuesoperating expenses, which includes the hiring of personnel to support revenue growth and a $45 million pre-tax charge to provide an allowance against certain disputed client receivables. Additionally, we had a lower effective tax rate which was favorably impacted byin 2017, stemming from certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017.

We had cash collections of receivables of $5.4$5.49 billion in 20172018 compared to $5.2$5.44 billion in 2016.2017. Days sales outstanding was 79 days for the 2018 fourth quarter compared to 82 days for the 2018 third quarter and 72 days for the 2017 fourth quarter compared to 73 days for the 2017 third quarter and 69 days for the 2016 fourth quarter. Operating cash flows for 20172018 were $1.3$1.45 billion compared to $1.2$1.31 billion in 2016.2017.

Revenue Recognition

In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance as further discussed in Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The impact of applying this new guidance (versus prior U.S. GAAP) increased 2018 revenues and earnings before income taxes by $207 million and $101 million, respectively. This impact is primarily driven by certain new contracts in 2018 where we made commitments for specified upgrades. Under the new revenue guidance, we are required to estimate stand-alone selling price when allocating transaction consideration to performance obligations, such as specified upgrades. Under prior U.S. GAAP, we could not establish vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for specified upgrades, which would have delayed the revenue recognition on the entire contract until the upgrades were delivered.

Health Care Information Technology Market Outlook

We have provided an assessment of the health care information technology market under "Health Care and Health Care IT Industry" in Part I, Item 1 "Business," which is incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations
Fiscal Year 20172018 Compared to Fiscal Year 20162017
(In thousands)2017
% of
Revenue
 2016 
% of
Revenue
 % Change  2018
% of
Revenue
 2017 
% of
Revenue
 % Change  
 
      
Revenues        $5,366,325
100% $5,142,272
 100% 4 %
System sales$1,355,172
26% $1,265,962
 26% 7 %
Support and maintenance1,046,656
21% 1,015,811
 21% 3 %
Services2,638,981
51% 2,426,155
 51% 9 %
Reimbursed travel101,463
2% 88,545
 2% 15 %
 
      
Total revenues5,142,272
100% 4,796,473
 100% 7 %
        
Costs of revenue        
Costs of revenue854,091
17% 779,116
 16% 10 %937,348
17% 854,091
 17% 10 %
 
       
      
Total margin4,288,181
83% 4,017,357
 84% 7 %
Margin4,428,977
83% 4,288,181
 83% 3 %
                
Operating expenses                
Sales and client service2,276,821
44% 2,071,926
 43% 10 %2,493,696
46% 2,276,821
 44% 10 %
Software development605,046
12% 551,418
 11% 10 %683,663
13% 605,046
 12% 13 %
General and administrative355,267
7% 392,454
 8% (9)%389,469
7% 355,267
 7% 10 %
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles90,576
2% 90,546
 2%  %87,364
2% 90,576
 2% (4)%
     

       

  
Total operating expenses3,327,710
65% 3,106,344
 65% 7 %3,654,192
68% 3,327,710
 65% 10 %
     

       

  
Total costs and expenses4,181,801
81% 3,885,460
 81% 8 %4,591,540
86% 4,181,801
 81% 10 %
     

       

  
Operating earnings960,471
19% 911,013
 19% 5 %774,785
14% 960,471
 19% (19)%
                
Other income, net6,658
  7,421
    26,066
  6,658
    
Income taxes(100,151)  (281,950)    (170,792)  (100,151)    
                
Net earnings$866,978
  $636,484
   36 %$630,059
  $866,978
   (27)%
Revenues & Backlog
Revenues increased 7%4% to $5.1$5.37 billion in 2017,2018, as compared to $4.8$5.14 billion in 2016.
System sales, which include2017. The growth in revenues from the sale of licensed software (including perpetual license sales and software asincludes a service), technology resale (hardware, devices, and sublicensed software), deployment period

licensed software upgrade rights, installation fees, transaction processing and subscriptions, increased 7% to $1.4 billion in 2017, from $1.3 billion in 2016. The increase in system sales was primarily driven by increases in licensed software and subscriptions of $63 million and $27 million, respectively.
Support and maintenance revenues increased 3% from 2016 to 2017. This increase was primarily attributable to continued success selling Cerner Millennium applications and implementing them at client sites.
Services revenue, which includes professional services (excluding installation) and managed services, increased 9% to $2.6 billion in 2017, from $2.4 billion in 2016. This increase was driven by a $148$220 million increase in professional services duerevenue, driven by increased contributions from Cerner ITWorks and revenue cycle services. Refer to growth in implementation and consulting activities and growth in managed servicesNote (2) of $65 million as a result of continued demandthe notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our hosting services.business models.
Revenue backlog,
Backlog, which reflects contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized as revenue, increased 10%was $15.25 billion as of December 29, 2018, of which we expect to $17.5 billionrecognize approximately 29% as revenue over the next 12 months. In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance as further discussed in 2017, comparedNote (2) of the notes to $15.9 billionconsolidated financial statements. In connection with the adoption of such guidance, we modified our calculation of backlog as previously determined under Regulation S-K to represent the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially satisfied) to conform to the new revenue recognition guidance. Backlog amounts disclosed prior to the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance have not been adjusted, and are not comparable to, the current period presentation.
We believe that backlog may not necessarily be a comprehensive indicator of future revenue as certain of our arrangements may be canceled (or conversely renewed) at our clients' option, thus contract consideration related to such cancellable periods has been excluded from our calculation of backlog. However, historically our experience has been that such cancellation provisions are rarely exercised. We expect to recognize approximately $525 million of revenue over the next 12 months under currently executed contracts related to such cancellable periods, which is not included in 2016. This increase was driven by solid levelsour calculation of new business bookings during the past four quarters, including strong levels of managed services bookings that typically have longer contract terms.backlog.
Costs of Revenue
Costs of revenue as a percent of total revenues were 17% in 2017, compared to 16% in 2016. The marginally higher costs of revenue as a percent of total revenues was primarily due to higher third-party costs associated with technology resale.both 2018 and 2017.
Costs of revenue include the cost of reimbursed travel expense, sales commissions, third party consulting services and subscription content and computer hardware, devices and sublicensed software purchased from manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Such costs, as a percent of total revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, devices, maintenance, support, services and reimbursed travel)services) carrying different margin rates changes from period to period. Costs of revenue does not include the costs of our client service personnel who are responsible for delivering our service offerings. Such costs are included in sales and client service expense.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased 7%10% to $3.3$3.65 billion in 2017,2018, as compared with $3.1to $3.33 billion in 2016.2017.
 
Sales and client service expenses as a percent of total revenues were 46% in 2018, compared to 44% in 2017, compared to 43% in 2016.2017. These expenses increased 10% to $2.3$2.49 billion in 2017,2018, from $2.1$2.28 billion in 2016.2017. Sales and client service expenses include salaries and benefits of sales, marketing, support, and services personnel, depreciation and other expenses associated with our managed services business, communications expenses, unreimbursed travel expenses, expense for share-based payments, and trade show and advertising costs. The 2018 amount includes a pre-tax charge of $45 million to provide an allowance against certain client receivables with Fujitsu Services Limited ("Fujitsu"), as further discussed in Note (3) of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The remaining growth in sales and client service expenses is primarily due to the hiring of services personnel to support growth in services revenue.
Software development expenses as a percent of revenues were 13% in 2018, compared to 12% in 2017. Expenditures for software development include ongoing development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium® and HealtheIntent platforms, with a focus on supporting key initiatives to enhance physician experience, revenue cycle and population health solutions. A summary of our total software development expense in 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)2018 2017
    
Software development costs$747,128
 $705,944
Capitalized software costs(271,787) (271,411)
Capitalized costs related to share-based payments(1,906) (2,737)
Amortization of capitalized software costs210,228
 173,250
    
Total software development expense$683,663
 $605,046
General and administrative expenses as a percent of revenues were 7% in both 2018 and 2017. These expenses increased 10% to $389 million in 2018, from $355 million in 2017. General and administrative expenses include

salaries and benefits for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees, depreciation and amortization, transaction gains or losses on foreign currency, expense for share-based payments, acquisition costs and related adjustments. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to increased expense associated with share-based payment awards.
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles as a percent of revenues was 2% in both 2018 and 2017. These expenses decreased 4% to $87 million in 2018, from $91 million in 2017. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles includes the amortization of customer relationships, acquired technology, trade names, and non-compete agreements recorded in connection with our business acquisitions. The decrease in amortization of acquisition-related intangibles includes the impact of certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.
Non-Operating Items
Other income, net was $26 million in 2018, compared to $7 million in 2017. The increase is primarily attributable to increased interest on our cash and investment balances, due to rising interest rates.

Our effective tax rate was 21% in 2018, compared to 10% in 2017. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2018is primarily a result of impacts from certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017. Refer to Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our effective tax rate. We do not expect significant changes to our overall effective tax rate in 2019, from what is reported for 2018.

Operations by Segment
We have two operating segments: Domestic and Global. The Domestic segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures associated with business activity in the United States. The Global segment primarily includes revenue contributions and expenditures linked to business activity in Aruba, Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, Denmark, Egypt, England, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates. Refer to Note (17) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our reportable segments.

The following table presents a summary of our operating segment information for the years ended 2018 and 2017:
(In thousands)2018 % of Segment Revenue 2017 % of Segment Revenue % Change  
          
Domestic Segment         
Revenues$4,730,266
 100% $4,575,171
 100% 3%
Costs of revenue827,904
 18% 755,729
 17% 10%
Operating expenses2,164,465
 46% 1,998,544
 44% 8%
Total costs and expenses2,992,369
 63% 2,754,273
 60% 9%
       
  
Domestic operating earnings1,737,897
 37%
1,820,898
 40% (5)%
          
Global Segment         
Revenues636,059
 100% 567,101
 100% 12%
Costs of revenue109,444
 17% 98,362
 17% 11%
Operating expenses321,116
 50% 264,196
 47% 22%
Total costs and expenses430,560
 68% 362,558
 64% 19%
       
  
Global operating earnings205,499
 32% 204,543
 36% —%
          
Other, net(1,168,611)   (1,064,970)   10%
          
Consolidated operating earnings$774,785
   $960,471
   (19)%
Domestic Segment
Revenues increased 3% to $4.73 billion in 2018, from $4.58 billion in 2017. The growth in revenues includes a $181 million increase in professional services revenue, driven by increased contributions from Cerner ITWorks

and revenue cycle services. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our business models.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 18% in 2018, compared to 17% in 2017. The higher costs of revenue as a percent of revenues was primarily driven by higher third-party costs associated with services revenue.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 46% in 2018, compared to 44% in 2017. The higher operating expenses as a percent of revenues reflects the hiring of personnel to support revenue growth.

Global Segment
Revenues increased 12% to $636 million in 2018, from $567 million in 2017. This increase was driven by growth across most of our business. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our business models.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 17% in both 2018 and 2017.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 50% in 2018, compared to 47% in 2017. The increase as a percent of revenues is primarily due to a pre-tax charge of $45 million in 2018 to provide an allowance against certain client receivables with Fujitsu, as further discussed in Note (3) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Other, net
Operating results not attributed to an operating segment include expenses such as software development, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and related adjustments, share-based compensation expense, and certain amortization and depreciation. These expenses increased 10% from 2017 to 2018. The increase is primarily due to increased software development expenses, including increased amortization of capitalized software costs resulting from releases of new and enhanced solutions over the last four quarters.

Fiscal Year 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year 2016
(In thousands)2017
% of
Revenue
 2016 
% of
Revenue
 % Change  
         
Revenues$5,142,272
100% $4,796,473
 100% 7 %
Costs of revenue854,091
17% 779,116
 16% 10 %
         
Margin4,288,181
83% 4,017,357
 84% 7 %
         
Operating expenses        
Sales and client service2,276,821
44% 2,071,926
 43% 10 %
Software development605,046
12% 551,418
 11% 10 %
General and administrative355,267
7% 392,454
 8% (9)%
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles90,576
2% 90,546
 2%  %
         
Total operating expenses3,327,710
65% 3,106,344
 65% 7 %
         
Total costs and expenses4,181,801
81% 3,885,460
 81% 8 %
         
Operating earnings960,471
19% 911,013
 19% 5 %
         
Other income, net6,658
  7,421
    
Income taxes(100,151)  (281,950)    
         
Net earnings$866,978
  $636,484
   36 %

Revenues
Revenues increased 7% to $5.14 billion in 2017, as compared to $4.80 billion in 2016. The growth in revenues includes a $147 million increase in professional services revenue, driven by growth in implementation and consulting activities. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our business models.
Costs of Revenue
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 17% in 2017, compared to 16% in 2016. The marginally higher costs of revenue as a percent of revenues was primarily due to higher third-party costs associated with technology resale.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased 7% to $3.33 billion in 2017, as compared to $3.11 billion in 2016.
Sales and client service expenses as a percent of revenues were 44% in 2017, compared to 43% in 2016. These expenses increased 10% to $2.28 billion in 2017, from $2.07 billion in 2016. The growth in sales and client service expenses reflects hiring of services personnel to support the growth in services revenue.
Software development expenses as a percent of total revenues were 12% in 2017, compared to 11% in 2016. Expenditures for software development include ongoing development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium and HealtheIntent platforms, with a focus on supporting key initiatives to enhance physician experience, revenue cycle and population health solutions. A summary of our total software development expense in 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

Software development expenses as a percent of revenues were 12% in 2017, compared to 11% in 2016. Expenditures for software development include ongoing development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium® and HealtheIntent platforms, with a focus on supporting key initiatives to enhance physician experience, revenue cycle and population health solutions. A summary of our total software development expense in 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016
    
Software development costs$705,944
 $704,882
Capitalized software costs(271,411) (290,911)
Capitalized costs related to share-based payments(2,737) (2,785)
Amortization of capitalized software costs173,250
 140,232
    
Total software development expense$605,046
 $551,418

General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues were 7% in 2017, compared to 8% in 2016. These expenses decreased 9% to $355 million in 2017, from $392 million in 2016. General and administrative expenses include salaries and benefits for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, professional fees, depreciation and amortization, transaction gains or losses on foreign currency,

expense for share-based payments, acquisition costs and related adjustments. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to 2016 containing $36 million of expenses associated with a voluntary separation plan. Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further detail regarding our 2016 voluntary separation plan.

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles as a percent of total revenues was 2% in both 2017 and 2016. These expenses remained flat at $91 million in both 2017 and 2016. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles includes the amortization of customer relationships, acquired technology, trade names, and non-compete agreements recorded in connection with our business acquisitions.

Non-Operating Items
 
Other income, net remained flat at $7 million in both 2017 and 2016.2016.

Our effective tax rate was 10% in 2017, compared to 31% in 2016. The decrease in the effective tax rate in 2017 is primarily a result of impacts from certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017, and the inclusion of net excess tax benefits as discrete items within the tax provision, upon our adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017. Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding our adoption of ASU 2016-09 and its impact on our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate is expected to increase in 2018, from our 2017 rate of 10%. However, we expect such effective tax rate in 2018 to be lower than historical rates (2016 and prior) primarily due to provisions in the aforementioned U.S. income tax reform, which reduced the statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.

Operations by Segment
We have two operating segments: Domestic and Global. The Domestic segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures associated with business activity in the United States. The Global segment includes revenue contributions and expenditures linked to business activity in Aruba, Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, Denmark, Egypt, England, Finland, France, Germany, Guam, India, Ireland, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates. Refer to Note (17) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our reportable segments.

The following table presents a summary of our operating segment information for the years ended 2017 and 2016:
(In thousands)2017 % of Revenue 2016 % of Revenue % Change  2017 % of Segment Revenue 2016 % of Segment Revenue % Change  
        
Domestic Segment        
Revenues$4,575,171
 100% $4,245,097
 100% 8%$4,575,171
 100% $4,245,097
 100% 8%
Costs of revenue755,729
 17% 676,437
 16% 12%755,729
 17% 676,437
 16% 12%
Operating expenses1,998,544
 44% 1,774,146
 42% 13%1,998,544
 44% 1,774,146
 42% 13%
Total costs and expenses2,754,273
 60% 2,450,583
 58% 12%2,754,273
 60% 2,450,583
 58% 12%
    
     
Domestic operating earnings1,820,898
 40%
1,794,514
 42% 1%1,820,898
 40% 1,794,514
 42% 1%
        
Global Segment        
Revenues567,101
 100% 551,376
 100% 3%567,101
 100% 551,376
 100% 3%
Costs of revenue98,362
 17% 102,679
 19% (4)%98,362
 17% 102,679
 19% (4)%
Operating expenses264,196
 47% 246,243
 45% 7%264,196
 47% 246,243
 45% 7%
Total costs and expenses362,558
 64% 348,922
 63% 4%362,558
 64% 348,922
 63% 4%
    
     
Global operating earnings204,543
 36% 202,454
 37% 1%204,543
 36% 202,454
 37% 1%
        
Other, net(1,064,970) (1,085,955) (2)%(1,064,970) (1,085,955) (2)%
        
Consolidated operating earnings$960,471
 $911,013
 5%$960,471
 $911,013
 5%
Domestic Segment
Revenues increased 8% to $4.6$4.58 billion in 2017, from $4.2$4.25 billion in 2016. This2016. The growth in revenues includes a $141 million increase was primarilyin professional services revenue, driven by growth in services revenue.implementation and consulting activities. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our business models.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 17% in 2017, compared to 16% in 2016. The marginally higher costs of revenue as a percent of total revenues was primarily due to higher third-party costs associated with technology resale.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 44% in 2017, compared to 42% in 2016. The increase as a percent of revenues reflects hiring of services personnel to support the growth in services revenue.

Global Segment
Revenues increased 3% to $567 million in 2017, from $551 million in 2016. This increase was primarily driven byThe growth in servicesrevenues includes a $13 million increase in support and maintenance revenue. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding revenues disaggregated by our business models.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 17% in 2017,, compared to 19% in 2016.2016. The lower costs of revenue as a percent of revenues was primarily driven by a lower mix of technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 47% in 2017, compared to 45% in 2016. The increase as a percent of revenues is primarily due to an increase in non-personnel expenses.

Other, net
Operating results not attributed to an operating segment include expenses such as software development, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and related adjustments, share-based compensation expense, and certain amortization and depreciation. These expenses decreased 2% from 2016 to 2017. The decrease was primarily due to 2016 containing $36 million of expenses associated with a voluntary separation plan. Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further detail regarding our 2016 voluntary separation plan.

Fiscal Year 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year 2015
(In thousands)2016
% of
Revenue
 2015 
% of
Revenue
 % Change  
Revenues        
System sales$1,265,962
26% $1,281,890
 29% (1)%
Support and maintenance1,015,811
21% 975,701
 22% 4 %
Services2,426,155
51% 2,094,874
 47% 16 %
Reimbursed travel88,545
2% 72,802
 2% 22 %
         
Total revenues4,796,473
100% 4,425,267
 100% 8 %
         
Costs of revenue        
Costs of revenue779,116
16% 750,781
 17% 4 %
         
Total margin4,017,357
84% 3,674,486
 83% 9 %
         
Operating expenses        
Sales and client service2,071,926
43% 1,838,600
 42% 13 %
Software development551,418
11% 539,799
 12% 2 %
General and administrative392,454
8% 423,424
 10% (7)%
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles90,546
2% 91,527
 2% (1)%
         
Total operating expenses3,106,344
65% 2,893,350
 65% 7 %
         
Total costs and expenses3,885,460
81% 3,644,131
 82% 7 %
         
Operating earnings911,013
19% 781,136
 18% 17 %
         
Other income, net7,421
  244
    
Income taxes(281,950)  (242,018)    
         
Net earnings$636,484
  $539,362
   18 %

Revenues & Backlog
Revenues increased 8% to $4.8 billion in 2016, as compared to $4.4 billion in 2015.
System sales decreased 1% from 2015 to 2016. The decrease in system sales was primarily driven by a decline in technology resale.
Support and maintenance revenues increased 4% to $1.0 billion in 2016, compared to $976 million in 2015. This increase was primarily attributable to continued success selling Cerner Millennium applications and implementing them at client sites.
Services revenue increased 16% to $2.4 billion in 2016, from $2.1 billion in 2015. This increase was driven by a $207 million increase in professional services due to growth in implementation and consulting activities and growth in managed services of $124 million as a result of continued demand for our hosting services.

Revenue backlog increased 12% to $15.9 billion in 2016 compared to $14.2 billion in 2015. This increase was driven by solid levels of new business bookings revenue during the past four quarters, including strong levels of managed services bookings that typically have longer contract terms.
Costs of Revenue
Costs of revenue as a percent of total revenues were 16% in 2016, compared to 17% in 2015. The lower costs of revenue as a percent of total revenues was primarily driven by a lower mix of technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses increased 7% to $3.1 billion in 2016, compared with $2.9 billion in 2015.
Sales and client service expenses as a percent of total revenues were 43% in 2016, compared to 42% in 2015. These expenses increased 13% to $2.1 billion in 2016, from $1.8 billion in 2015. The growth in services expense and increase as a percent of total revenues reflects hiring of services personnel to support the strong growth in services revenue.

Software development expenses as a percent of total revenues were 11% in 2016, compared to 12% in 2015. Expenditures for software development include ongoing development and enhancement of the Cerner Millennium and HealtheIntent platforms, with a focus on supporting key initiatives to enhance physician experience, revenue cycle and population health solutions. A summary of our total software development expense in 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)2016 2015
    
Software development costs$704,882
 $685,260
Capitalized software costs(290,911) (262,177)
Capitalized costs related to share-based payments(2,785) (2,479)
Amortization of capitalized software costs140,232
 119,195
    
Total software development expense$551,418
 $539,799

General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues were 8% in 2016, compared to 10% in 2015. These expenses decreased 7% to $392 million in 2016, from $423 million in 2015. The decrease as a percent of total revenues was primarily the result of decreased expenses in 2016 related to acquisition costs and related adjustments associated with our acquisition of the Cerner Health Services business and our voluntary separation plans. General and administrative expenses in 2016 and 2015 include acquisition costs and related adjustments associated with our Cerner Health Services business of $4 million and $46 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses in 2016 and 2015 include costs associated with our voluntary separation plans of $36 million and $46 million, respectively. At the end of 2016, our voluntary separation plans were complete. Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further detail regarding the voluntary separation plans.


Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles as a percent of total revenues was 2% in both 2016 and 2015. These expenses decreased 1% to $91 million in 2016, from $92 million in 2015. The decrease in amortization of acquisition-related intangibles includes the impact of certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

Non-Operating Items
Other income, net was $7 million in 2016, compared to less than $1 million in 2015. This increase is primarily due to increased capitalization of interest on construction in process, primarily related to our Innovations Campus (office space development located in Kansas City, Missouri).

Our effective tax rate was 31% in both 2016 and 2015. Refer to Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our effective tax rate.
Operations by Segment

The following table presents a summary of our operating segment information for the years ended 2016 and 2015:
(In thousands)2016 % of Revenue 2015 % of Revenue % Change  
          
Domestic Segment         
Revenues$4,245,097
 100% $3,904,454
 100% 9%
Costs of revenue676,437
 16% 651,826
 17% 4%
Operating expenses1,774,146
 42% 1,577,594
 40% 12%
Total costs and expenses2,450,583
 58% 2,229,420
 57% 10%
          
Domestic operating earnings1,794,514
 42% 1,675,034
 43% 7%
          
Global Segment         
Revenues551,376
 100% 520,813
 100% 6%
Costs of revenue102,679
 19% 98,955
 19% 4%
Operating expenses246,243
 45% 233,047
 45% 6%
Total costs and expenses348,922
 63% 332,002
 64% 5%
          
Global operating earnings202,454
 37% 188,811
 36% 7%
          
Other, net(1,085,955)   (1,082,709)   —%
          
Consolidated operating earnings$911,013
   $781,136
   17%
Domestic Segment
Revenues increased 9% to $4.2 billion in 2016, from $3.9 billion in 2015. This increase was primarily driven by growth in services revenue.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 16% in 2016, compared to 17% in 2015. The lower costs of revenue as a percent of revenues was primarily driven by a lower mix of technology resale, which carries a higher cost of revenue.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 42% in 2016, compared to 40% in 2015. The increase as a percent of revenues reflects a higher mix of services during 2016 that was driven by services revenue growth.

Global Segment
Revenues increased 6% to $551 million in 2016, from $521 million in 2015. This increase was driven by growth across most of our business.
Costs of revenue as a percent of revenues were 19% in both 2016 and 2015.
Operating expenses as a percent of revenues were 45% in both 2016 and 2015.
Other, net
These expenses were flat at $1.1 billion in both 2016 and 2015.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity is influenced by many factors, including the amount and timing of our revenues, our cash collections from our clients and the amount we invest in software development, acquisitions, capital expenditures, and in recent years, our share repurchase programs.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents, which primarily consist of money market funds, commercial paper and time deposits with original maturities of less than 90 days, and short-term investments. At the end of 2017,2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $374 million and short-term investments of $401 million, as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $371 million and short-term investments of $435 million as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $171 million and short-term investments of $186 million at the end of 2016.2017.
We maintain a $100 million multi-year revolving credit facility, which expires in October 2020. The facility provides an unsecured revolving line of credit for working capital purposes, along with a letter of credit facility. We have the ability to increase the maximum capacity to $200 million at any time during the facility's term, subject to lender participation. As of the end of 2017,2018, we had no outstanding borrowings under this facility; however, we had $52$30 million of outstanding letters of credit, which reduced our available borrowing capacity to $48$70 million. Refer to Note (9) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our credit facility.

We believe that our present cash position, together with cash generated from operations, short-term investments and, if necessary, our available line of credit, will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements during 20182019.
The following table summarizes our cash flows in 20172018, 20162017 and 20152016:
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Cash flows from operating activities$1,307,675
 $1,245,637
 $1,039,928
$1,454,009
 $1,307,675
 $1,245,637
Cash flows from investing activities(1,005,851) (789,774) (1,405,943)(828,937) (1,005,851) (789,774)
Cash flows from financing activities(110,984) (676,677) 143,847
(609,787) (110,984) (676,677)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash9,222
 (10,447) (10,913)(12,082) 9,222
 (10,447)
Total change in cash and cash equivalents200,062
 (231,261) (233,081)3,203
 200,062
 (231,261)
          
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period170,861
 402,122
 635,203
370,923
 170,861
 402,122
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$370,923
 $170,861
 $402,122
$374,126
 $370,923
 $170,861
          
Free cash flow (non-GAAP)$671,444
 $492,514
 $413,140
$733,388
 $671,444
 $492,514

Cash from Operating Activities
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Cash collections from clients$5,444,531
 $5,184,252
 $4,419,650
$5,486,654
 $5,444,531
 $5,184,252
Cash paid to employees and suppliers and other(3,932,398) (3,665,592) (3,248,149)(4,032,498) (3,932,398) (3,665,592)
Cash paid for interest(17,914) (18,484) (13,164)(15,707) (17,914) (18,484)
Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds(186,544) (254,539) (118,409)15,560
 (186,544) (254,539)
          
Total cash from operations$1,307,675
 $1,245,637
 $1,039,928
$1,454,009
 $1,307,675
 $1,245,637
Cash flow from operations increased $146 million in 2018 compared to 2017, due primarily to net refunds of taxes. Cash flow from operations increased $62 million in 2017 compared to 2016, due primarily to an increase in cash impacting earnings, partially offset by an increase in cash used to fund working capital requirements. Cash flow from operations increased $206 million inDuring 2018, 2017 and 2016, compared to 2015, due primarily to a reduction in cash used to fund working capital requirements, along with an increase in cash impacting earnings. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we received total client cash collections of $5.4$5.49 billion, $5.2$5.44 billion and $4.4$5.18 billion, respectively. Days sales outstanding was 7279 days in the fourth quarter of 2017,2018, compared to 7382 days for the 20172018 third quarter and 6972 days for the 20162017 fourth quarter. Revenues provided under support and maintenance agreements represent recurring cash flows. We expect these revenues to continue to grow as the base of installed systems grows.

Cash from Investing Activities
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Capital purchases$(362,083) $(459,427) $(362,132)$(446,928) $(362,083) $(459,427)
Capitalized software development costs(274,148) (293,696) (264,656)(273,693) (274,148) (293,696)
Purchases of investments, net of sales and maturities(339,974) (18,179) 720,406
(71,497) (339,974) (18,179)
Acquisition of businesses
 
 (1,478,129)
Purchases of other intangibles(29,646) (18,472) (21,432)
Purchase of other intangibles(36,819) (29,646) (18,472)
          
Total cash flows from investing activities$(1,005,851) $(789,774) $(1,405,943)$(828,937) $(1,005,851) $(789,774)
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of capital spending and short-term investment and acquisition activities.
Our capital spending in 20172018 was driven by capitalized equipment purchases primarily to support growth in our managed services business, investments in a cloud infrastructure to support cloud-based solutions, building and improvement purchases to support our facilities requirements and capitalized spending to support our ongoing software development initiatives. Capital purchases in 2018 were higher than 2017 were lower than 2016 levels, as we completed the first two phases of construction on our Innovations Campus (office space development located in Kansas City, Missouri) in January 2017. Total capital spending is expected to increase in 2018 in excess of $100 million, primarily driven by an increase in spending to support our facilities requirements, including commencement of construction on the next two phases of our Innovations Campus;Campus (office space development located in Kansas City, Missouri); along with increased capital purchases to support the growth in our managed services business. Total capital spending is expected to increase more than $75 million in 2019, primarily driven by spending to support our facilities requirements, including the continued construction of our Innovations Campus.
Short-term investment activity historically consists of the investment of cash generated by our business in excess of what is necessary to fund operations. NetOur 2016 and 2018 activity is impacted by higher levels of excess cash from investmentsbeing used to repurchase shares of our common stock, as discussed further below. Additionally, on July 27, 2018 we acquired a minority interest in 2015 is dueEssence Group Holdings Corporation for cash consideration of $266 million. Refer to the use of proceeds from additional investment sales and maturities to partially fund our acquisitionNote (4) of the Cerner Health Services business. In 2016 and 2017, we returnednotes to net purchases of investments, which we expect to continue in 2018, as we expect strong levels of cash flow.
During 2015, we paid cash to acquire the Cerner Health Services business and the Lee's Summit Tech Center of $1.39 billion and $85 million, respectively.consolidated financial statements for further information regarding this investment. We expect to continue seeking and completing strategic business acquisitions or investments that are complementary to our business. Refer to Note (2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our business acquisitions.
Cash from Financing Activities
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Long-term debt issuance$
 $
 $500,000
Repayment of long-term debt
 
 (14,325)$(75,000) $
 $
Cash from option exercises (net of taxes paid in connection with shares surrendered by associates)65,121
 25,672
 15,032
81,476
 65,121
 25,672
Treasury stock purchases(173,434) (700,275) (345,057)(623,127) (173,434) (700,275)
Contingent consideration payments for acquisition of businesses(2,671) (2,074) (11,012)(1,691) (2,671) (2,074)
Other, net
 
 (791)
Other8,555
 
 
          
Total cash flows from financing activities$(110,984) $(676,677) $143,847
$(609,787) $(110,984) $(676,677)
In January 2015,March 2018, we issued $500repaid our $75 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes. Proceeds from the Seniorfloating rate Series 2015-C Notes were available for general corporate purposes.due February 15, 2022. Refer to Note (9) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additionalfurther information regarding the Senior Notes.our outstanding indebtedness.
Cash inflows from stock option exercises are dependent on a number of factors, including the price of our common stock, grant activity under our stock option and equity plans, and overall market volatility. We expect net cash inflows from stock option exercises to continue in 20182019 based on the number of exercisable options at the end of 20172018 and our current stock price. Refer to Note (14) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our stock option and equity plans.
During 2018, 2017 2016 and 2015,2016, we repurchased 11.2 million shares of our common stock for total consideration of $644 million, 2.7 million shares of our common stock for total consideration of $173 million, and 13.7 million shares of our common stock for total consideration of $700 million, and 5.7 million shares of our common stock

for total consideration of $345 million, respectively. At the end of 2017, $4272018, $283 million remains available for repurchase under our current repurchase program. We may continue to repurchase shares under this program in 2018,2019, which will be dependent on a number of factors, including the price of our common stock. Although we may continue to repurchase shares, there is no assurance that we will repurchase up to the full amount remaining under the program. Refer to Note (14) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our share repurchase programs.program.

Subject to declaration by the Board of Directors, the Company plans to initiate a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share, with the first payment expected in the third quarter of 2019. Future dividends will be subject to the determination, declaration and discretion of the Board of Directors and compliance with our covenants under our credit facility. The Company anticipates that the cash used for future dividends and share repurchases will come primarily from cash from operations.

Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP)
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Cash flows from operating activities (GAAP)$1,307,675
 $1,245,637
 $1,039,928
$1,454,009
 $1,307,675
 $1,245,637
Capital purchases(362,083) (459,427) (362,132)(446,928) (362,083) (459,427)
Capitalized software development costs(274,148) (293,696) (264,656)(273,693) (274,148) (293,696)
          
Free cash flow (non-GAAP)$671,444
 $492,514
 $413,140
$733,388
 $671,444
 $492,514

Free cash flow increased $62 million in 2018, compared to 2017. This increase was primarily due to an increase in cash from operations, partially offset by increased capital purchases. Free cash flow increased $179 million in 2017, compared to 2016. This increase was primarily due to increased operatingan increase in cash flow,from operations, along with reduced capital purchases as discussed above. Free cash flow increased $79 million in 2016, compared to 2015. This increase was due to an increase in cash flows from operations, partially offset by higher levels of both capital spending to support our growth initiatives and facilities requirements, and capitalized spending to support our ongoing software development initiatives.purchases.

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure used by management along with GAAP results to analyze our earnings quality and overall cash generation of the business. We define free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities reduced by capital purchases and capitalized software development costs. The table above sets forth a reconciliation of free cash flow to cash flows from operating activities, which we believe to beis the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to free cash flow. The presentation of free cash flow is not meant to be considered in isolation, nor as a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results, and investors should be aware that non-GAAP measures have inherent limitations and should be read only in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flow may also be different from similar non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and may not be comparable to similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. We believe free cash flow is important to enable investors to better understand and evaluate our ongoing operating results and allows for greater transparency in the review and understanding of our overall financial, operational and economic performance, because free cash flow takes into account certain capital expenditures necessary to operate our business.


Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table represents a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments at the end of 2017,2018, except short-term purchase order commitments arising in the ordinary course of business.
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
(In thousands)2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and thereafter Total2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 and thereafter Total
                          
Balance sheet obligations(a):
            
            
Long-term debt obligations$
 $2,500
 $
 $1,100
 $301,700
 $208,862
 $514,162
$
 $2,500
 $
 $226,100
 $1,700
 $208,862
 $439,162
Interest on long-term debt obligations16,473
 16,780
 16,870
 16,906
 11,399
 17,900
 96,328
14,315
 14,315
 14,315
 10,738
 7,160
 10,740
 71,583
Capital lease obligations11,585
 1,483
 
 
 
 
 13,068
4,914
 
 
 
 
 
 4,914
Interest on capital lease obligations336
 43
 
 
 
 
 379
143
 
 
 
 
 
 143
Income tax payable on deemed repatriation of foreign subsidiary earnings(b)
2,009
 2,009
 2,009
 2,009
 2,009
 15,069
 25,114
                          
Other obligations:            
            
Operating lease obligations32,371
 28,605
 24,012
 19,452
 12,914
 6,463
 123,817
29,739
 27,669
 22,904
 17,240
 10,166
 17,743
 125,461
Purchase obligations76,861
 47,587
 17,250
 5,490
 4,410
 22,504
 174,102
138,851
 102,773
 24,746
 15,517
 15,486
 26,924
 324,297
                          
Total$139,635
 $99,007
 $60,141
 $44,957
 $332,432
 $270,798
 $946,970
$187,962
 $147,257
 $61,965
 $269,595
 $34,512
 $264,269
 $965,560
(a) At the end of 2017,2018, liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits were $15$19 million.
(b) At the end of 2017, such amounts were provisionally recorded. Refer to Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

We have no off balance sheet arrangements as defined in Regulation S-K. The effects of inflation on our business during 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 were not significant.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note (1) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amount of revenue and other significant areas involving our judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, software development, and income taxes. These accounting policies and our procedures related to these accounting policies are described in detail below and under specific areas within this MD&A. In addition, Note (1), Note (2), and Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements expands upon discussion of our accounting policies.policies for these areas.

Revenue Recognition - through 2017
We recognized revenue within our multiple element arrangements, including software and software-related services, using the residual method. Key factors in our revenue recognition model were our assessments that implementation services are not essential to the functionality of our software, we can establish vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for any undelivered elements, and the length of time it takes for us to achieve the delivery and implementation milestones for our licensed software. If such implementation services were deemed to be essential to the functionality of our software, the period of time over which our licensed software revenue would be recognized would have lengthened. If VSOE of fair value could not be established for both the implementation services and the support services, the entire arrangement fee would have been recognized ratably over the period during which the implementation services were expected to be performed or the support period, whichever was longer, beginning with delivery of the software, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria were met.

Revenue Recognition - 2018 forward
In the first quarter of 2018, we will adoptadopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09, as amended, will replacereplaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP.

This new guidance will requirerequires a significant amount of judgments and estimates in implementing its five-step process to be followed in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition and related disclosures. Refer to Note (1)(2) of the notes to consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding significant judgments involved in our statusapplication of adoption/implementation.ASU 2014-09.

Software Development Costs
Costs incurred internally in creating computer software solutions and enhancements to those solutions are expensed until completion of a detailed program design, which is when we determine that technological feasibility has been established. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized until such time as the software solutions and enhancements are available for general release, and the capitalized costs subsequently are reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value.

Net realizable value is computed as the estimated gross future revenues from each software solution less the amount of estimated future costs of completing and disposing of that product. Because the development of projected net future revenues related to our software solutions used in our net realizable value computation is based on estimates, a significant reduction

in our future revenues could impact the recovery of our capitalized software development costs. If we missed our estimates of net future revenues by 10%, the amount of our capitalized software development costs would not be impaired.

Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected net future revenue for each software solution with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the software solution. We are amortizing capitalized costs over five years. The five-year period over which capitalized software development costs are amortized is an estimate based upon our forecast of a reasonable useful life for the capitalized costs. Historically, use of our software programs by our clients has exceeded five years and is capable of being used a decade or more.

We expect that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and systems integrators and others specializing in the health care industry may offer competitive products or services. The pace of change in the HCIT market is rapid and there are frequent new product introductions, product enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, the capitalized software solutions may become less valuable or obsolete and could be subject to impairment.

Income Taxes
We make a number of assumptions and estimates in determining the appropriate amount of expense to record for income taxes. These assumptions and estimates consider the taxing jurisdictions in which we operate as well as current tax regulations. Accruals are established for estimates of tax effects for certain transactions, business structures and future projected profitability of our businesses based on our interpretation of existing facts and circumstances. If these assumptions and estimates were to change as a result of new evidence or changes in circumstances, the change in estimate could result in a material adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.

As further discussed in Note (12) of the notes to consolidated financial statements, we have provisionally recorded the impact of certain U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017. We made a number of assumptions and estimates in determining such impact including revaluation of our net deferred tax liability to the lower enacted tax rate, the impact of deemed repatriation, and certain other changes. It is reasonably possible that our estimates regarding the impact of this tax reform may materially change in the near term.

We have discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure contained herein.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk, primarily changes in LIBOR, related to our Series 2015-C Notes issued in January 2015. As of December 30, 2017, the interest rate for the current interest period on our Series 2015-C Notes was 2.42%, based on the three-month floating LIBOR rate. Based on our balance of $75 million of Series 2015-C Notes as of December 30, 2017, an increase in interest rates of 1.0% would cause a corresponding increase in our annual interest expense of less than $1 million.Risk.

We have global operations, and as a result, we are exposed to market risk related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations through December 30, 201729, 2018 have not had a material impact on our financial position or operating results. We currently do not use currency hedging instruments, though we actively monitor our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and may use hedging transactions in the future if management deems it appropriate. We believe most of our global operations are naturally hedged for foreign currency risk as our foreign subsidiaries invoice their clients and satisfy their obligations primarily in their local currencies. There can be no guarantee that the impact of foreign currency fluctuations in the future will not have a material impact on our financial position or operating results.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary DataData.

The Financial Statements and Notesnotes to consolidated financial statements required by this Item are submitted as a separate part of this report. See Note (18) to the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements for supplementary financial information.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure.

N/A

Item 9A. Controls and ProceduresProcedures.

a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sOur management is responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report (the "Evaluation Date"). TheyBased upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, and based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15, theseour disclosure controls and procedures were designed and were effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities and would be disclosed on a timely basis. The CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to giveprovide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Companyus in our reports that it fileswe file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in theSEC rules and forms of the SEC. They have also concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are is

accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

b)Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

The Company'sOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company'sOur management assessed the effectiveness of the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017.29, 2018. In making this assessment, the Company'sour management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). The Company’sBased on this assessment, our management has concluded that, as of December 30, 2017, the Company's29, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting iswas effective based on these criteria. The Company’sOur independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein under "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm".



c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During 2017, we initiatedthe fourth fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2018, progress continued on a plan that calls for modifications and enhancements to the Company’sour internal controls over financial reporting in relation to our upcoming adoption of the new revenue recognitionlease standard effective in the first quarter of 2018.2019. Such plan resulted in changes to certain processprocesses and procedures.procedures during the quarter. Specifically, we implemented/modified internal controls to address:

Monitoring of the adoption process; and
The gathering of information and evaluation of analysis used in the development of disclosures required prior to the new standard’s effective date.standard's adoption.

As we continue the implementation process, we expect that there will be additional changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

During 2017, we implemented a new human resources administration and payroll system. Certain internal controls were modified in connection with the implementation of this new system.

Except as disclosed above, there were no other changes in the Company’sour internal controls over financial reporting during 2017,the fiscal quarter ended December 29, 2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal controls over financial reporting.

d)Limitations on Controls.

The Company’sOur management, including itsour CEO and CFO, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at that reasonable assurance level. However, the Company’sour management can provide no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can prevent all errors and all fraud under all circumstances. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been or will be detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B. Other InformationInformation.

N/A


PART IIIIII.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceGovernance.

The information under "Information Concerning Directors," "Meetings of the Board and Committees," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," "Corporate Governance: Code of Business Conduct and Ethics," "Consideration of Director Nominees" andNominees," "Committees of the Board: Audit Committee" and "Certain Transactions" as it relates to family relationships as set forth in the Company's definitive proxy statement related to its 20182019 annual meeting of stockholders (the "Proxy Statement"), which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since our last disclosure thereof in our 20172018 proxy statement.

The information required by this Item 10 regarding our Executive Officers is set forth under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I above.

Item 11. Executive CompensationCompensation.
 
The information under "Committees of the Board: Compensation Committee," "Director Compensation," "2017"2018 Director Compensation Table," "Compensation Committee Report," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Summary Compensation Table," "2017"2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards," "Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172018 Fiscal Year-End," "2017"2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested," "Potential Payments Under Termination or Change in Control," "Pay Ratio" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersMatters.

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 30, 2017:29, 2018:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights (1)
 
Weighted average exercise price per share (2)
 
Securities available for future issuance(3)
Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights (1)
 
Weighted average exercise price per share (2)
 
Securities available for future issuance(3)
Plan category  
          
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (4)
22,131
 $49.40
 11,800
22,674
 $52.31
 7,400
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 

 
 
          
Total22,131
   11,800
22,674
   7,400

(1) Includes grants of stock options, time-based and performance-based restricted stock and restricted stock units. 
(2) Includes weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.  
(3) Excludes securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights. 
(4) Includes the Stock Option Plan D, Stock Option Plan E, 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan F, 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan G and 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. All new grants are made under the 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as the previous plans are no longer active. 

The information under "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceIndependence.

The information under "Certain Transactions" and "Meetings of the Board and Committees" set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Services.
 
The information under "Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IVIV.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesSchedules.

a)Financial Statements and Exhibits

(1)Consolidated Financial Statements:
            
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            
Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of December 30, 201729, 2018 and December 31, 201630, 2017

Consolidated Statements of Operations -Years Ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Years Ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity - Years Ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

b)Exhibits

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit(s) 
Filing Date
SEC File No./Film No.
 Filed Herewith
           
3.1  10-K 3(a) 2/11/2015  
           
3.2  8-K 3.2 3/6/2017  
           
4  10-K 4(a) 
2/28/2007
000-15386/07658265
  
           
10.1*  10-K 10(a) 
2/28/2007
000-15386/07658265
  
           
10.2*  8-K 99.1 
6/3/2010
000-15386/10875957
  
           
10.3*        X
           
10.4*  8-K/A 10.1 8/17/2017  
           
10.5*  10-K 10(c) 
2/27/2008
000-15386/08646565
  
           
10.6*  8-K 10.1 9/11/2017  
           
10.7*  8-K 10.2 9/11/2017  
           
10.8*  8-K 10.3 9/11/2017  
           
10.9*  10-Q 10.10 10/27/2017  
           
10.10*  8-K 10.4 9/11/2017  
           
10.11*  10-K 10(f) 
3/30/2001
000-15386/1586224
  
           
10.12*  10-K 10(g) 
3/30/2001
000-15386/1586224
  
           
10.13*  DEF 14A Annex I 
4/16/2001
000-15386/1603080
  
           
10.14*  10-K 10(v) 
3/17/2005
000-15386/05688830
  
           
10.15*  10-Q 10(a) 
11/10/2005
000-15386/051193974
  
           
10.16*  10-K 10(x) 
3/17/2005
000-15386/05688830
  
           
10.17*  10-K 10(w) 
3/17/2005
000-15386/05688830
  
    Incorporated by Reference  
Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit(s) 
Filing Date
SEC File No./Film No.
 Filed Herewith
           
3.1  10-K 3(a) 2/11/2015  
           
3.2  8-K 3.1 3/6/2018  
           
4  10-K 4(a) 
2/28/2007
000-15386/07658265
  
           
10.1*  10-K 10(a) 
2/28/2007
000-15386/07658265
  
           
10.2*  8-K 99.1 
6/3/2010
000-15386/10875957
  
           
10.3*  10-K 10.3 2/12/2018  
           
10.4*  10-Q 10.2 5/3/2018  
           
10.5*  10-Q 10.1 10/26/2018  
           
10.6*  8-K/A 10.1 8/17/2017  
           
10.7*  8-K 10.1 9/11/2017  
           
10.8*  10-Q 10.2 10/26/2018  
           
10.9*  8-K 10.2 9/11/2017  
           
10.10*  8-K 10.3 9/11/2017  
           
10.11*  10-Q 10.10 10/27/2017  
           
10.12*  8-K 10.4 9/11/2017  
           
10.13*        X
           
10.14*  10-K 10(f) 
3/30/2001
000-15386/1586224
  
           
10.15*  10-K 10(g) 
3/30/2001
000-15386/1586224
  
           
10.16*        X
           
10.17*  DEF 14A Annex I 
4/16/2001
000-15386/1603080
  
           

10.18*8-K99.1
6/4/2010
000-15386/10879084
10.19*10-K10(g)
2/27/2008
000-15386/08646565
10.20*10-K10(q)
2/27/2008
000-15386/08646565
10.21*8-K10.25/27/2015
10.22*10-Q10.1
7/27/2012
000-15386/1586224
10.23*10-Q10.25/6/2016
10.24*10-K10(u)
2/8/2013
000-15386/1386825
10.25*10-Q10.35/6/2016
10.26*10-Q10.410/27/2017
10.27*10-Q10.45/6/2016
10.28*10-Q10.310/27/2017
10.29*10-K10(v)
2/8/2013
000-15386/13586825
10.30*10-Q10.55/6/2016
10.31*10-Q10.28/3/2016
10.32*10-Q10.210/27/2017
10.33*10-Q10.24/28/2017
10.34*10-Q10.510/27/2017
10.35*10-Q10.34/28/2017
10.36*10-Q10.610/27/2017
10.37*S-84.6
5/27/2011
333-174568/11877216
10.38*8-K/A10.16/1/2016
10.39*10-Q10.14/28/2017
10.40*10-Q10.110/27/2017
10.18*  10-K 10(v) 
3/17/2005
000-15386/05688830
  
           
10.19*  10-Q 10(a) 
11/10/2005
000-15386/051193974
  
           
10.20*  10-K 10(g) 
2/27/2008
000-15386/08646565
  
           
10.21*  10-K 10(q) 
2/27/2008
000-15386/08646565
  
           
10.22*  8-K 10.2 5/27/2015  
           
10.23*  10-Q 10.2 5/6/2016  
           
10.24*  10-K 10(u) 
2/8/2013
000-15386/13586825
  
           
10.25*  10-Q 10.3 5/6/2016  
           
10.26*  10-Q 10.4 10/27/2017  
           
10.27*  10-Q 10.4 5/6/2016  
           
10.28*  10-Q 10.3 10/27/2017  
           
10.29*  10-K 10(v) 
2/8/2013
000-15386/13586825
  
           
10.30*  10-Q 10.5 5/6/2016  
           
10.31*  10-Q 10.2 8/3/2016  
           
10.32*  10-Q 10.2 10/27/2017  
           
10.33*  10-Q 10.2 4/28/2017  
           
10.34*  10-Q 10.5 10/27/2017  
           
10.35*  10-Q 10.3 4/28/2017  
           
10.36*  10-Q 10.6 10/27/2017  
           
10.37*        X
           
10.38*  8-K 10.1 3/6/2018  
           
10.39*  8-K 10.2 3/6/2018  
           
10.40  8-K 99.1 
1/25/2010
000-15386/10543089
  
           

           
10.41*  10-Q 10.1 7/26/2013  
           
10.42*  10-K 10.25 2/17/2016  
           
10.43  8-K 99.1 
1/25/2010
000-153866/10543089
  
           
10.44  8-K 10.1 8/1/2013  
           
10.45  10-K 10.28 2/11/2015  
           
10.46  10-K 10.29 2/11/2015  
           
10.47  10-Q 2.1 10/24/2014  
           
10.48  8-K 10.1 2/2/2015  
           
10.49  8-K 10.1 12/5/2014  
           
10.50  8-K 10.1 11/3/2015  
           
21        X
           
23        X
           
31.1        X
           
31.2        X
           
32.1        X
           
32.2        X
           
101.INS XBRL Instance Document       X

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase DocumentX
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentX
10.41  10-Q 2.1 
10/24/2014
000-15386/141172425
  
           
10.42  8-K 10.1 2/2/2015  
           
10.43  8-K 10.1 
12/5/2014
000-15386/141269611
  
           
10.44  8-K 10.1 11/3/2015  
           
21        X
           
23        X
           
31.1        X
           
31.2        X
           
32.1        X
           
32.2        X
           
101.INS XBRL Instance Document       X
           
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document       X
           
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document       X
           
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document       X
           
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document       X
           
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document       X
* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be identified by Part IV, Item 15(a)(3).


PLEASE NOTE: Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have filed or incorporated by reference the agreements referenced above as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K. The agreements have been filed to provide investors with information regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about the Company or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements. Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts. In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company's public disclosures. Accordingly, investors

should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Company or its business or operations on the date hereof.


Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
    
  CERNER CORPORATION
    
Date: February 12, 20188, 2019 By:/s/ D. Brent Shafer
    D. Brent Shafer
    Chairman of the Board and
    Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature and Title Date
   
/s/ D. Brent Shafer February 12, 20188, 2019
D. Brent Shafer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  
   
/s/ Clifford W. IlligFebruary 12, 2018
Clifford W. Illig, Vice Chairman and Director
/s/ Marc G. Naughton February 12, 20188, 2019
Marc G. Naughton, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  
   
/s/ Michael R. Battaglioli February 12, 20188, 2019
Michael R. Battaglioli, Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
  
   
/s/ Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr. February 12, 20188, 2019
Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D., Director  
   
/s/ Denis A. Cortese February 12, 20188, 2019
Denis A. Cortese, M.D., Director  
   
/s/ Mitchell E. Daniels February 12, 20188, 2019
Mitchell E. Daniels, Director  
   
/s/ Linda M. Dillman February 12, 20188, 2019
Linda M. Dillman, Director  
   
/s/ Julie L. Gerberding February 12, 20188, 2019
Julie L. Gerberding, M.D., Director  
   
/s/ William B. NeavesFebruary 12, 2018
William B. Neaves, Ph.D., Director
/s/ William D. Zollars February 12, 20188, 2019
William D. Zollars, Director  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Cerner Corporation:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries' (the "Company") internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,29, 2018, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,29, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 30, 201729, 2018 and December 31, 2016,30, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-yearthree‑year period ended December 30, 2017,29, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 12, 20188, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/KPMG LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 12, 2018


8, 2019

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Cerner Corporation:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cerner Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 30, 201729, 2018 and December 31, 2016,30, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 30, 2017,29, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 30, 201729, 2018 and December 31, 2016,30, 2017, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 30, 2017,29, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017,29, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 12, 20188, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
ChangeChanges in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue transactions with customers in 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". The Company also changed its method of accounting for certain share-based payment award transactions in 2017 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-09 "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting", effective January 1, 2017.

.
Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1983.

Kansas City, Missouri
February 12, 20188, 2019


CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 30, 201729, 2018 and December 31, 201630, 2017
(In thousands, except share data)2017 20162018 2017
      
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$370,923
 $170,861
$374,126
 $370,923
Short-term investments434,844
 185,588
401,285
 434,844
Receivables, net1,042,781
 944,943
1,183,494
 1,042,781
Inventory15,749
 14,740
25,029
 15,749
Prepaid expenses and other515,930
 303,229
334,870
 515,930
Total current assets2,380,227
 1,619,361
2,318,804
 2,380,227
      
Property and equipment, net1,603,319
 1,552,524
1,743,575
 1,603,319
Software development costs, net822,159
 719,209
894,512
 822,159
Goodwill853,005
 844,200
847,544
 853,005
Intangible assets, net479,753
 566,047
405,305
 479,753
Long-term investments196,837
 109,374
300,046
 196,837
Other assets134,011
 219,248
198,850
 134,011
      
Total assets$6,469,311
 $5,629,963
$6,708,636
 $6,469,311
      
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity      
      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable$218,996
 $238,134
$293,534
 $218,996
Current installments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations11,585
 26,197
4,914
 11,585
Deferred revenue311,337
 311,839
399,189
 311,337
Accrued payroll and tax withholdings183,770
 211,554
195,931
 183,770
Other accrued expenses63,907
 57,677
69,122
 63,907
Total current liabilities789,595
 845,401
962,690
 789,595
      
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations515,130
 537,552
438,802
 515,130
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities365,674
 306,263
Deferred revenue13,564
 12,800
Deferred income taxes336,379
 336,446
Other liabilities42,376
 42,792
Total liabilities1,683,963
 1,702,016
1,780,247
 1,683,963
      
Shareholders’ Equity:      
Common stock, $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 359,204,864 shares issued at December 30, 2017 and 353,731,237 shares issued at December 31, 20163,592
 3,537
Common stock, $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 362,212,843 shares issued at December 29, 2018 and 359,204,864 shares issued at December 30, 20173,622
 3,592
Additional paid-in capital1,380,371
 1,230,913
1,559,562
 1,380,371
Retained earnings4,938,866
 4,094,327
5,576,525
 4,938,866
Treasury stock, 26,743,517 shares at December 30, 2017 and 24,089,737 shares at December 31, 2016(1,464,099) (1,290,665)
Treasury stock, 37,905,013 shares at December 29, 2018 and 26,743,517 shares at December 30, 2017(2,107,768) (1,464,099)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(73,382) (110,165)(103,552) (73,382)
Total shareholders’ equity4,785,348
 3,927,947
4,928,389
 4,785,348
      
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$6,469,311
 $5,629,963
$6,708,636
 $6,469,311

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016
 
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands, except per share data)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Revenues:     
System sales$1,355,172
 $1,265,962
 $1,281,890
Support, maintenance and services3,685,637
 3,441,966
 3,070,575
Reimbursed travel101,463
 88,545
 72,802
     
Total revenues5,142,272
 4,796,473
 4,425,267
Revenues$5,366,325
 $5,142,272
 $4,796,473
Costs and expenses:          
Cost of system sales448,321
 412,066
 430,335
Cost of support, maintenance and services304,307
 278,505
 247,644
Cost of reimbursed travel101,463
 88,545
 72,802
Costs of revenue937,348
 854,091
 779,116
Sales and client service2,276,821
 2,071,926
 1,838,600
2,493,696
 2,276,821
 2,071,926
Software development (Includes amortization of $173,250, $140,232 and $119,195, respectively)605,046
 551,418
 539,799
Software development (Includes amortization of $210,228, $173,250 and $140,232, respectively)683,663
 605,046
 551,418
General and administrative355,267
 392,454
 423,424
389,469
 355,267
 392,454
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles90,576
 90,546
 91,527
87,364
 90,576
 90,546
          
Total costs and expenses4,181,801
 3,885,460
 3,644,131
4,591,540
 4,181,801
 3,885,460
          
Operating earnings960,471
 911,013
 781,136
774,785
 960,471
 911,013
          
Other income, net6,658
 7,421
 244
26,066
 6,658
 7,421
          
Earnings before income taxes967,129
 918,434
 781,380
800,851
 967,129
 918,434
Income taxes(100,151) (281,950) (242,018)(170,792) (100,151) (281,950)
          
Net earnings$866,978
 $636,484
 $539,362
$630,059
 $866,978
 $636,484
          
Basic earnings per share$2.62
 $1.88
 $1.57
$1.91
 $2.62
 $1.88
Diluted earnings per share$2.57
 $1.85
 $1.54
$1.89
 $2.57
 $1.85
Basic weighted average shares outstanding331,373
 337,740
 343,178
330,084
 331,373
 337,740
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding337,999
 343,653
 350,908
333,572
 337,999
 343,653
See notes to consolidated financial statements.


CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the years ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016
 
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Net earnings$866,978
 $636,484
 $539,362
$630,059
 $866,978
 $636,484
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other (net of taxes (benefit) of $4,909, $2,092 and $(3,201), respectively)37,463
 (33,871) (32,171)
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments (net of taxes (benefit) of $(416), $37 and $(46), respectively)(680) 60
 (87)
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other (net of taxes (benefit) of $(645), $4,909 and $2,092, respectively)(30,575) 37,463
 (33,871)
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments (net of taxes (benefit) of $132, $(416) and $37, respectively)405
 (680) 60
          
Comprehensive income$903,761
 $602,673
 $507,104
$599,889
 $903,761
 $602,673
See notes to consolidated financial statements.


CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:          
Net earnings$866,978
 $636,484
 $539,362
$630,059
 $866,978
 $636,484
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization580,723
 504,236
 452,225
642,591
 580,723
 504,236
Share-based compensation expense83,019
 74,536
 70,121
95,423
 83,019
 74,536
Provision for deferred income taxes47,409
 (11,517) 65,245
34,428
 47,409
 (11,517)
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of businesses acquired):     
Changes in assets and liabilities:     
Receivables, net(32,836) 78,258
 (160,124)(207,785) (32,836) 78,258
Inventory(972) (666) 12,951
(9,307) (972) (666)
Prepaid expenses and other(191,369) (66,658) (55,363)156,216
 (191,369) (66,658)
Accounts payable6,960
 (13,197) 7
65,202
 6,960
 (13,197)
Accrued income taxes18,358
 64,073
 55,269
(27,849) 18,358
 64,073
Deferred revenue(3,114) 1,555
 9,450
81,538
 (3,114) 1,555
Other accrued liabilities(67,481) (21,467) 50,785
(6,507) (67,481) (21,467)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities1,307,675
 1,245,637
 1,039,928
1,454,009
 1,307,675
 1,245,637
          
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:          
Capital purchases(362,083) (459,427) (362,132)(446,928) (362,083) (459,427)
Capitalized software development costs(274,148) (293,696) (264,656)(273,693) (274,148) (293,696)
Purchases of investments(632,048) (482,078) (487,981)(623,293) (632,048) (482,078)
Sales and maturities of investments292,074
 463,899
 1,208,387
551,796
 292,074
 463,899
Purchase of other intangibles(29,646) (18,472) (21,432)(36,819) (29,646) (18,472)
Acquisition of businesses
 
 (1,478,129)
          
Net cash used in investing activities(1,005,851) (789,774) (1,405,943)(828,937) (1,005,851) (789,774)
          
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:          
Long-term debt issuance
 
 500,000
Repayment of long-term debt
 
 (14,325)(75,000) 
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options76,705
 63,794
 51,475
91,349
 76,705
 63,794
Payments to taxing authorities in connection with shares directly withheld from associates(11,584) (38,122) (36,443)(9,873) (11,584) (38,122)
Treasury stock purchases(173,434) (700,275) (345,057)(623,127) (173,434) (700,275)
Contingent consideration payments for acquisition of businesses(2,671) (2,074) (11,012)(1,691) (2,671) (2,074)
Other
 
 (791)8,555
 
 
          
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(110,984)
(676,677) 143,847
Net cash used in financing activities(609,787)
(110,984) (676,677)
          
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents9,222
 (10,447) (10,913)(12,082) 9,222
 (10,447)
          
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents200,062
 (231,261) (233,081)3,203
 200,062
 (231,261)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period170,861
 402,122
 635,203
370,923
 170,861
 402,122
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$370,923
 $170,861
 $402,122
$374,126
 $370,923
 $170,861
     
Summary of acquisition transactions:     
Fair value of tangible assets acquired$
 $(10,200) $532,625
Fair value of intangible assets acquired
 (25,000) 637,980
Fair value of goodwill
 46,940
 485,387
Less: Fair value of liabilities assumed
 (11,740) (176,863)
Less: Fair value of contingent liability payable
 
 (1,000)
     
Net cash used$
 $
 $1,478,129
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the years ended December 30, 201729, 2018, December 31, 201630, 2017 and January 2,December 31, 2016
Common Stock Additional Retained Treasury Accumulated OtherCommon Stock Additional Retained Treasury Accumulated Other
(In thousands)Shares Amount Paid-in Capital Earnings Stock Comprehensive Income (Loss)Shares Amount Paid-in Capital Earnings Stock Comprehensive Loss, Net
           
Balance at January 3, 2015346,986
 $3,470
 $933,446
 $2,918,481
 $(245,333) $(44,096)
           
Exercise of stock options (including net-settled option exercises)3,337
 33
 15,647
 
 
 
           
Employee share-based compensation expense
 
 70,121
 
 
 
           
Employee share-based compensation net excess tax benefit
 
 56,568
 
 
 
           
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (32,258)
           
Treasury stock purchases
 
 
 
 (345,057) 
           
Net earnings
 
 
 539,362
 
 
                      
Balance at January 2, 2016350,323
 3,503
 1,075,782
 3,457,843
 (590,390) (76,354)350,323
 $3,503
 $1,075,782
 $3,457,843
 $(590,390) $(76,354)
                      
Exercise of stock options (including net-settled option exercises)3,408
 34
 27,747
 
 
 
3,408
 34
 27,747
 
 
 
                      
Employee share-based compensation expense
 
 74,536
 
 
 

 
 74,536
 
 
 
                      
Employee share-based compensation net excess tax benefit
 
 52,848
 
 
 

 
 52,848
 
 
 
                      
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (33,811)
 
 
 
 
 (33,811)
                      
Treasury stock purchases
 
 
 
 (700,275) 

 
 
 
 (700,275) 
                      
Net earnings
 
 
 636,484
 
 

 
 
 636,484
 
 
                      
Balance at December 31, 2016353,731
 3,537
 1,230,913
 4,094,327
 (1,290,665) (110,165)353,731
 3,537
 1,230,913
 4,094,327
 (1,290,665) (110,165)
                      
Exercise of stock options (including net-settled option exercises)5,474
 55
 66,439
 
 
 
5,474
 55
 66,439
 
 
 
                      
Employee share-based compensation expense
 
 83,019
 
 
 

 
 83,019
 
 
 
                      
Cumulative effect of accounting change (Note 1)
 
 
 (22,439) 
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASU 2016-16)
 
 
 (22,439) 
 
                      
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 36,783

 
 
 
 
 36,783
                      
Treasury stock purchases
 
 
 
 (173,434) 

 
 
 
 (173,434) 
                      
Net earnings
 
 
 866,978
 
 

 
 
 866,978
 
 
                      
Balance at December 30, 2017359,205
 $3,592
 $1,380,371
 $4,938,866
 $(1,464,099)
$(73,382)359,205
 3,592
 1,380,371
 4,938,866
 (1,464,099) (73,382)
           
Exercise of stock options (including net-settled option exercises)3,008
 30
 83,768
 
 
 
           
Employee share-based compensation expense
 
 95,423
 
 
 
           
Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASU 2014-09)
 
 
 7,600
 
 
           
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 (30,170)
           
Treasury stock purchases
 
 
 
 (643,669) 
           
Net earnings
 
 
 630,059
 
 
           
Balance at December 29, 2018362,213
 $3,622
 $1,559,562
 $5,576,525
 $(2,107,768)
$(103,552)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
(1) Basis of Presentation, Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of Cerner Corporation ("Cerner," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our") and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The consolidated financial statements were prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. Fiscal years 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 each consisted of 52 weeks and ended on December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. All references to years in these notes to consolidated financial statements represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted.

Nature of Operations

We design, develop, market, install, host and support health care information technology, health care devices, hardware and content solutions for health care organizations and consumers. We also provide a wide range of value-added services, including implementation and training, remote hosting, operational management services, revenue cycle services, support and maintenance, health care data analysis, clinical process optimization, transaction processing, employer health centers, employee wellness programs and third party administrator services for employer-based health plans.

Siemens Health ServicesFactors Impacting Comparability of Financial Statements

On February 2, 2015,As of December 29, 2018, we acquired Siemens Health Services, as further describedhave separately presented deferred income taxes in Note (2). The addition of the Siemens Health Services business impacts the comparability of our consolidated financial statements as ofbalance sheets and for the year ended January 2, 2016, in relationreclassified other non-current liabilities to the comparative periods presented herein.caption "other liabilities". While this reporting change did not impact our consolidated results, prior period reclassifications have been made to conform to the current period presentation.

Voluntary Separation Plans

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company adopted a voluntary separation plan ("2015 VSP") for eligible associates. Generally, the 2015 VSP was available to U.S. associates who met a minimum level of combined age and tenure, excluding, among others, our executive officers. Associates who elected to participate in the 2015 VSP received financial benefits commensurate with their tenure and position, along with vacation payout and medical benefits. The irrevocable acceptance period for most associates electing to participate in the 2015 VSP ended in May 2015. During 2015, we recorded pre-tax charges for the 2015 VSP of $46 million, which are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations. At the end of 2015, this program was complete.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Companywe adopted a new voluntary separation plan ("2016 VSP") for eligible associates. This 2016 VSP was available to U.S. associates who met a minimum level of combined age and tenure. Associates who elected to participate in the 2016 VSP received financial benefits commensurate with their tenure and position, along with vacation payout and medical benefits. The irrevocable acceptance period for associates electing to participate in the 2016 VSP ended in December 2016. During 2016, we recorded pre-tax charges for the 2016 VSP of $36 million, which are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations. At the end of 2016, this program was complete.

In January 2019, we adopted a new voluntary separation plan ("2019 VSP") for eligible associates. Generally, this 2019 VSP is available to U.S. associates who meet a minimum level of combined age and tenure, excluding, among others, or executive officers. Associates who elect to participate in the 2019 VSP will receive financial benefits commensurate with their tenure and position, along with vacation payout, medical benefits, and accelerated vesting of certain share-based payment awards. Eligible associates will have until February 13, 2019 to indicate interest in participation. For those associates approved to participate, their voluntary departure date will be in April 2019. We expect to record expense related to the 2019 VSP in 2019, once we know the level of associate participation.

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
Cash paid during the year for:          
Interest (including amounts capitalized of $10,387, $14,852, and $7,106, respectively)$17,914
 $18,484
 $13,164
Interest (including amounts capitalized of $12,710, $10,387, and $14,852, respectively)$15,707
 $17,914
 $18,484
Income taxes, net of refunds186,544
 254,539
 118,409
(15,560) 186,544
 254,539

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Revenue Recognition - The following is a discussion of revenue recognition policies followed by the Company through 2017. Refer to (q) belowNote (2) for discussion regarding new revenue guidance effective for 2018.

We recognize software related revenue in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 985-605, Software – Revenue Recognition and non-software related revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. In general, revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria have been met:

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
Our fee is fixed or determinable; and
Collection of the revenue is reasonably assured.

The following are our major components of revenue:

System sales – includes the licensing of computer software, software as a service, deployment period upgrades, installation, content subscriptions, transaction processing and the sale of computer hardware and sublicensed software;
Support, maintenance and services – includes software support and hardware maintenance, remote hosting and managed services, training, consulting and implementation services; and
Reimbursed travel – includes reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses (primarily travel) incurred in connection with our client service activities.

We provide for several models of procurement of our information systems and related services. The predominant model involves multiple deliverables and includes a perpetual software license agreement, project-related implementation and consulting services, software support and either hosting services or computer hardware and sublicensed software, which requires that we allocate revenue to each of these elements.

Allocation of Revenue to Multiple Element Arrangements
For multiple element arrangements that contain software and non-software elements, we allocate revenue to software and software-related elements as a group and any non-software element separately. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to the non-software elements, revenue is recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met for each element. For the group of software and software-related elements, revenue is recognized under the guidance applicable to software transactions.

Since we do not have vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of fair value on software licenses within our multiple element arrangements, we recognize revenue on our software and software-related elements using the residual method. Under the residual method, license revenue is recognized in a multiple-element arrangement when vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elementsadopted in the arrangement, when software is delivered, installed and all other conditions to revenue recognition are met. We allocate revenue to each undelivered element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. Specifically, we determine the fair valuefirst quarter of the software support, hardware maintenance, sublicensed software support, remote hosting, subscriptions and software as a service portions of the arrangement based on the substantive renewal price for these services charged to clients; professional services (including training and consulting) portion of the arrangement, based on hourly rates which we charge for these services when sold apart from a software license; and sublicensed software based on its price when sold separately from the software. The residual amount of the fee

after allocating revenue to the fair value of the undelivered elements is attributed to the licenses for software solutions. If evidence of the fair value cannot be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement using VSOE, the entire amount of revenue under the arrangement is deferred until these elements have been delivered or VSOE of fair value can be established.

We also enter into arrangements that include multiple non-software deliverables. For each element in a multiple element arrangement that does not contain software-related elements to be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting, the following must be met: the delivered products or services have value to the client on a stand-alone basis; and for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered products or services, delivery or performance of the undelivered product or service is considered probable and is substantially controlled by the Company. We allocate the arrangement consideration to each element based on the selling price hierarchy of VSOE of fair value, if it exists, or third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE are available, we use estimated selling price. After the arrangement consideration has been allocated to the elements, we account for each respective element in the arrangement as described below.

For certain arrangements, revenue for software, implementation services and, in certain cases, support services for which VSOE of fair value cannot be established are accounted for as a single unit of accounting. If VSOE of fair value cannot be established for both the implementation services and the support services, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the period during which the implementation services are expected to be performed or the support period, whichever is longer, beginning with delivery of the software, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met. The revenue recognized from single units of accounting are typically allocated and classified as system sales and support, maintenance and services. In cases where VSOE cannot be established, revenue is classified based on contract value. In instances where VSOE for undelivered elements is established subsequent to the outset of an arrangement, a cumulative adjustment to revenue is recognized in the period VSOE for the undelivered elements is established.

Revenue Recognition Policies for Each Element

We provide implementation and consulting services. These services vary depending on the scope and complexity of the engagement. Examples of such services may include database consulting, system configuration, project management, testing assistance, network consulting, post conversion review and application management services. Except for limited arrangements where our software requires significant modifications or customization, implementation and consulting services generally are not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software and, thus, do not impact the timing of the software license recognition. However, if software license fees are tied to implementation milestones, then the portion of the software license fee tied to implementation milestones is deferred until the related milestone is accomplished and related fees become due and payable and non-forfeitable. Implementation fees, for which VSOE of fair value can be determined, are recognized over the service period, which may extend from nine months to several years for multi-phased projects.

Remote hosting and managed services are marketed under long-term arrangements generally over periods of five to 10 years. These services are typically provided to clients that have acquired a perpetual license for licensed software and have contracted with us to host the software in one of our data centers. Under these arrangements, the client generally has the contractual right to take possession of the licensed software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty and it is feasible for the client to either run the software on its own equipment or contract with another party unrelated to us to host the software. Additionally, these services are not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the licensed software or other elements of the arrangement. As such, in situations for which we have VSOE of fair value for the undelivered items, we allocate the residual portion of the arrangement fee to the software and recognize it once the client has the ability to take possession of the software. The remaining fees in these arrangements, as well as the fees for arrangements where the client does not have the contractual right or the ability to take possession of the software at any time or for situations in which VSOE of fair value does not exist for undelivered elements, are generally recognized ratably over the hosting service period.

We also offer our solutions on a software as a service model, providing time-based licenses for our software solutions available within an environment that we manage from our data centers. The data centers provide system and administrative support as well as processing services. Revenue on these services is generally combined and recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract. We capitalize related pre-contract direct set-up costs consisting of third party costs and direct software installation and implementation costs associated with the initial set up of a software as a service client. These costs are amortized over the term of the arrangement.


Software support fees are marketed under annual and multi-year arrangements and are recognized as revenue ratably over the contractual support term. Hardware and sublicensed software maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the contractual maintenance term.

Subscription and content fees are generally marketed under annual and multi-year agreements and are recognized ratably over the contractual terms.

Hardware and sublicensed software sales are generally recognized when title and risk of loss have transferred to the client.

The sale of equipment under sales-type leases is recorded as system sales revenue at the inception of the lease. Sales-type leases also produce financing income, which is included in system sales revenue and is recognized at consistent rates of return over the lease term.

Where we have contractually agreed to develop new or customized software code for a client, we utilize percentage-of-completion accounting, labor-hours method.

Revenue generally is recognized net of any taxes collected from clients and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

Payment Arrangements

Our payment arrangements with clients typically include an initial payment due upon contract signing and date-based licensed software payment terms and payments based upon delivery for services, hardware and sublicensed software. Revenue recognition on support payments received in advance of the services being performed are deferred and classified as either current or long term deferred revenue depending on whether the revenue will be earned within one year.

We have periodically provided long-term financing options to creditworthy clients through third party financing institutions and have directly provided extended payment terms to clients from contract date. These extended payment term arrangements typically provide for date-based payments over periods ranging from 12 months up to seven years. As a significant portion of the fee is due beyond one year, we have analyzed our history with these types of arrangements and have concluded that we have a standard business practice of using extended payment term arrangements and a long history of successfully collecting under the original payment terms for arrangements with similar clients, product offerings, and economics without granting concessions. Accordingly, in these situations, we consider the fee to be fixed and determinable in these extended payment term arrangements and, thus, the timing of revenue is not impacted by the existence of extended payments.

Some of these payment streams have been assigned on a non-recourse basis to third party financing institutions. We account for the assignment of these receivables as sales of financial assets. Provided all revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize revenue for these arrangements under our normal revenue recognition criteria, and if appropriate, net of any payment discounts from financing transactions.2018.

(b) Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents consist of short-term marketable securities with original maturities less than 90 days.

(c) Available-for-sale Investments – Our short-term available-for-sale investments are primarily invested in time deposits, commercial paper, government and corporate bonds, with maturities of less than one year. Our long-term available-for-sale investments are primarily invested in government and corporate bonds with maturities of less than two years. All of our investments, other than a small portion accounted for under the cost and equity methods, are classified as available-for-sale.

Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, if any, are determined on a specific identification basis.

We regularly review investment securities for impairment based on both quantitative and qualitative criteria that include the extent to which cost exceeds fair value, the duration of any market decline, and the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer. Unrealized losses that are other than temporary are recognized in earnings.
 
Premiums are amortized and discounts are accreted over the life of the security as adjustments to interest income for our investments. Interest income is recognized when earned.


Refer to Note (3)(4) and Note (4)(5) for further description of these assets and their fair value.

(d) Concentrations - The majority of our cash and cash equivalents are held at three major financial institutions. The majority of our cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally these deposits may be redeemed upon demand.

As of the end of 2017, we had a significant concentration of receivables owed to us by Fujitsu Services Limited, which are currently in dispute. These receivables have been classified as long-term and are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note (5) for additional information.

(e) Inventory - Inventory consists primarily of computer hardware and sublicensed software, held for resale. Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value.

(f) Property and Equipment - We account for property and equipment in accordance with ASCAccounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over periods of one to 50 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using a straight-line method over the shorter of the lease terms or the useful lives, which range from periods of one to 15 years.

(g) Software Development Costs - Software development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC 985-20, Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. Software development costs incurred internally in creating computer software products are expensed until technological feasibility has been established upon completion of a detailed program design. Thereafter, all software development costs incurred through the software’ssoftware's general release date are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected future revenue for each software solution with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the solution. We amortize capitalized software development costs over five years.

(h) Goodwill - We account for goodwill under the provisions of ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indicator. All goodwill is assigned to a reporting unit, where it is subject to an annual impairment assessment. Based on these evaluations, there was no impairment of goodwill in 20172018, 20162017 or 20152016. Refer to Note (7) for more information on goodwill and other intangible assets.

(i) Intangible Assets - We account for intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is computed using the straight-line method over periods of three to 30 years.

(j) Income Taxes - Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying

amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Refer to Note (12) for additional information regarding income taxes.

(k) Earnings per Common Share - Basic earnings per share ("EPS") excludes dilution and is computed, in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings. Refer to Note (13) for additional details of our earnings per share computations.
 
(l) Accounting for Share-based Payments - We recognize all share-based payments to associates, directors and consultants, including grants of stock options, restricted stock and performance shares, in the financial statements as compensation cost based on their fair value on the date of grant, in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. This compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis for the fair value of awards that actually vest. Refer to Note (14) for a detailed discussion of share-based payments.

In 2017 we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 impacted several aspects of our accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (1) accounting and cash flow classification for excess tax benefits and deficiencies, (2) forfeitures, and (3) tax withholding requirements and cash flow classification.

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, when associates exercised stock options, or upon the vesting of restricted stock awards, we recognized any related excess tax benefits or deficiencies (the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the cumulative compensation cost recognized in the consolidated financial statements) in additional paid-in capital ("APIC"). During 2016 we recognized net excess tax benefits in APIC of $53 million. Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are recognized as a component of income tax expense. They are not estimated when determining the annual estimated effective tax rate; instead, they are recorded as discrete items in the reporting period they occur. This provision of the new guidance was required to be applied prospectively, and prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.
We utilize the treasury stock method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, this method assumed that any net excess tax benefits generated from the hypothetical exercise of dilutive options were used to repurchase outstanding shares. Assumed share repurchases for net excess tax benefits included in our calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2016 were 2.0 million shares. Under the new guidance, net excess tax benefits generated from the hypothetical exercise of dilutive options are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Therefore, the denominator in our diluted earnings per share calculation has increased (comparatively). This provision of the new guidance was required to be applied prospectively, and prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

(m) Voluntary Separation Benefits - We account for voluntary separation benefits in accordance with the provisions of ASC 712, Compensation-Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits. Voluntary separation benefits are recorded to expense when the associates irrevocably accept the offer and the amount of the termination liability is reasonably estimable.


(n) Foreign Currency - In accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries whose functional currency is the local currency are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The net exchange differences resulting from these translations are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations.

(o) Collaborative Arrangements - In accordance with ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements, third party costs incurred and revenues generated by arrangements involving joint operating activities of two or more parties that are each actively involved and exposed to risks and rewards of the activities are classified in the consolidated statements of operations on a gross basis only if we are determined to be the principal participant in the arrangement. Otherwise, third party revenues and costs generated by collaborative arrangements are presented on a net basis. Payments between participants are recorded and classified based on the nature of the payments.


(p) Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 20172018

Share-Based Compensation. In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment AccountingRevenue Recognition. ASU 2016-09 impacts several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (1) accounting and cash flow classification for excess tax benefits and deficiencies, (2) forfeitures, and (3) tax withholding requirements and cash flow classification. ASU 2016-09 was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2017. This new guidance impacts our consolidated financial statements as follows:

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, when associates exercised stock options, or upon the vesting of restricted stock awards, we recognized any related excess tax benefits or deficiencies (the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the cumulative compensation cost recognized in the consolidated financial statements) in additional paid-in capital ("APIC"). During 2016 and 2015, we recognized net excess tax benefits in APIC of $53 million and $57 million, respectively.

Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are recognized as a component of income tax expense. They are not estimated when determining the annual estimated effective tax rate; instead, they are recorded as discrete items in the reporting period they occur. During 2017, we recognized $66 million of net excess tax benefits as discrete items, which are included in income taxes in our consolidated statements of operations. These net excess tax benefits recognized during 2017 resulted in a favorable impact to diluted earnings per share of $0.19.

This provision of the new guidance may have a significant impact on our future income tax expense, including increased variability in our quarterly effective tax rates. The impact will be dependent on a number of factors, including the price of our common stock, grant activity under our stock and equity plans, and the timing of option exercises by our associates. This provision of the new guidance was required to be applied prospectively. Prior periods have not been retrospectively adjusted.

We utilize the treasury stock method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, this method assumed that any net excess tax benefits generated from the hypothetical exercise of dilutive options were used to repurchase outstanding shares. Assumed share repurchases for net excess tax benefits included in our calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2016 and 2015 were 2.0 million shares and 3.2 million shares, respectively.

Under the new guidance, net excess tax benefits generated from the hypothetical exercise of dilutive options are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Therefore, the denominator in our diluted earnings per share calculation has increased (comparatively). We estimate that this provision of the new guidance reduced our calculation of diluted earnings per share by $0.01 to $0.02 for 2017. This provision of the new guidance was required to be applied prospectively. Prior periods have not been retrospectively adjusted.

Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, we presented net excess tax benefits in our consolidated statements of cash flows as a cash inflow from financing activities. Under the new guidance, net excess tax benefits are to be presented within operating activities. We have elected to apply this provision of the new guidance retrospectively. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted.


Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, we presented cash payments to taxing authorities in connection with shares directly withheld from associates upon the exercise of stock options, or upon the vesting of restricted stock awards, to meet statutory tax withholding requirements (employee withholdings) as a cash outflow from operating activities. Under the new guidance, such payments are presented within financing activities. This provision of the new guidance was required to be applied retrospectively. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted.

Under the new guidance, an entity is permitted to make an entity-wide accounting policy election (at adoption) either to estimate the number of forfeitures expected to occur or to account for forfeitures as a reduction to compensation cost when they occur. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-09, we did not change our policy of estimating participant forfeitures as a part of our calculations of share-based compensation cost.

Income Taxes.In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory, which provides new guidance regarding when an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of certain intra-entity asset transfers. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-16, U.S. GAAP prohibited entities from recognizing the income tax consequences of intercompany asset transfers, including transfers of intellectual property. The seller deferred any net tax effect, and the buyer was prohibited from recognizing a deferred tax asset on the difference between the newly created tax basis of the asset in its tax jurisdiction and its financial statement carrying amount as reported in the consolidated financial statements. ASU 2016-16 requires entities to recognize these tax consequences in the period in which the transfer takes place, with the exception of inventory transfers.

ASU 2016-16 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of 2017. The standard requires the use of the modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition approach. The Companywe adopted the standard early, in the first quarter of 2017. In connection with such adoption, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment reducing prepaid expenses and other, other assets, and retained earnings within our consolidated balance sheets by $8 million, $14 million, and $22 million, respectively. This cumulative effect adjustment includes recognition of the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory that occurred prior to the adoption date. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

(q) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The new standard introduces a five-step process to be followed in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition. It also provides guidance on accounting for costs incurred to obtain or fulfill contracts with customers, and establishes disclosure requirements which are more extensive than those required under existing U.S. GAAP.
The FASB has issued numerous amendments to ASU 2014-09 from August 2015 through January 2018, which provide supplemental and clarifying guidance, as well as amend the effective date of the new standard.
ASU 2014-09, as amended, is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. Early adoption was permitted in the first quarter of 2017. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method.
We will adopt this new guidance effective with our first quarter of 2018, utilizing the modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method. Such method provides that the cumulative effect from prior periods upon applying the new guidance is recognized in our consolidated balance sheets as of the date of adoption, including an adjustment to retained earnings. Prior periods will not be retrospectively adjusted.
We expect this new guidance to impact the amount and timing of our revenue recognition as follows:
Generally, our subscription and content fees revenue is recognized ratably over the respective contract terms ("over time"). Upon adoption of the new guidance, we expect to recognize a license component of certain subscription and content fees revenue upon delivery to the customer ("point in time") and a non-license component (i.e. support) of such revenues over the respective contract terms ("over time").
For certain of our arrangements, revenue for software, implementation services and, in certain cases, support services for which vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value cannot be established are accounted for as a single unit of accounting. If VSOE of fair value cannot be established for both the implementation services and the support services, the entire arrangement fee is recognized ratably ("over time") over the period during which the

implementation services are expected to be performed or the support period, whichever is longer, beginning with delivery of the software, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria are met. Upon adoption of the new guidance, the concept of VSOE of fair value is eliminated. Consideration for an arrangement is allocated to performance obligations based on stand-alone selling price or an estimate of stand-alone selling price. With this change, we expect to be able to allocate consideration to the various elements within arrangements currently accounted for as a single unit of accounting. Such revenue will then be recognized as each performance obligation is delivered (i.e. "point in time" for software) or as provided to the customer (i.e. "over time" for implementation services and support services).
Certain of our arrangements contain fees, that upon adoption of the new guidance, will be considered a "material right". This "material right" will be a separate performance obligation under the new guidance, and we expect to recognize such amount over the term that will likely affect the client’s decision about whether to renew the related service ("over time").
At the date of adoption of this new guidance, we expect to record a cumulative adjustment to our consolidated balance sheet, including an adjustment to retained earnings, to adjust for the aggregate impact of these revenue items, as calculated under the new guidance. We currently estimate the amount of such adjustment to retained earnings to be approximately one percent of our annual 2017 revenues. Such estimate is preliminary and subject to change as we finalize our implementation process.
Although we have not fully completed our analysis of this new revenue recognition guidance, we do not believe that such guidance will materially impact the aggregate amount and timing of our revenue recognition subsequentguidance. Refer to adoption.
We have determined the only significant incremental costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers within the scope of ASU 2014-09, as amended, are sales commissions paid to associates. Under current U.S. GAAP, we recognize sales commissions as earned, and record such amounts as a component of total costs and expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. We recognized sales commission expense of $47 million, $44 million and $45 million in the 2017, 2016, and 2015 annual periods, respectively. Under the new guidance, we expect to record sales commissions as an asset, and amortize to expense over the related contract performance period. At the date of adoption of this new guidance, we expect to record an asset in our consolidated balance sheetsNote (2) for the amount of unamortized sales commissions for prior periods, as calculated under the new guidance. Such amount will subsequently be amortized to expense over the remaining performance periods of the related contracts with remaining performance obligations. We currently estimate that upon adoption we will record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the commissions expense increasing other assets, deferred income taxes and other liabilities, and retained earnings within our consolidated balance sheets by approximately $82 million, $20 million, and $62 million, respectively. Such estimate is preliminary and subject to change as we finalize our implementation process.
Our analysis and evaluation of the new standard will continue through the filing of our first quarter 2018 consolidated financial statements. A significant amount of work remains as we finalize calculations and evaluate the new disclosure requirements. We must also implement any necessary changes/modifications to processes, accounting systems, and internal controls.further details.

Financial Instruments. In January 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which was subsequently amended in February 2018 by ASU 2018-03, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This new guidance addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Such guidance will impactimpacts how we account for our investments reported under the cost method of accounting as follows:

Equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) will beare required to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.

The impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values will require a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value.
We will adoptadopted this new guidance effective withfor our first quarter of 2018. Provisions within the guidance applicable to the Company were required to be applied prospectively. We have elected to measure our cost method investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. At December 29, 2018, we had cost method investments of $277 million, which do not have readily determinable fair values. Such investments are included in long-term investments in our consolidated balance sheets. We did not record any changes in the measurement of such investments during 2018.

Internal-Use Software. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). Such guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted, and either prospective or retrospective application accepted. The Company adopted the standard early, in the third quarter of 2018, and we do not expectelected prospective application. The adoption of such guidance todid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

(q) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Leases.Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which introduces a new model that requires most leases to be reported on the balance sheet and aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in the new revenue recognition standard. The standard requires the use of the modified retrospective (cumulative

effect) transition approach. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which includes new transition guidance for the adoption of ASU 2016-02. Such guidance creates an additional transition method allowing entities to use the effective date of ASU 2016-02 as the date of initial application on transition. Under this method, entities will not be required to recast comparative periods when transitioning to the new guidance. Entities will also not be required to present comparative period disclosures and we do notunder the new guidance in the period of adoption. We expect to early adopt.select this new transition method upon our adoption in the first quarter of 2019.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, we continued our analysis of contractual arrangements that may qualify as leases under the new standard. We currently expect the most significant impact of this new guidance will be the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for our operating leases of office space. Refer to Note (16) where we disclose aggregate minimum future payments under these arrangements of $125 million at the end of 2018.


Our analysis and evaluation of the new standard will continue through the effective date in the first quarter of 2019. We must complete our analysis of contractual arrangements, quantify all impacts of this new guidance, and evaluate related disclosures. We must also implement any necessary changes/modifications to processes, accounting systems, and internal controls.

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which provides new guidance regarding the measurement and recognition of credit impairment for certain financial assets. Such guidance will impact how we determine our allowance for estimated uncollectible receivables and evaluate our available-for-sale investments for impairment. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of 2019. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and we havedo not determined if we willexpect to early adopt.

Callable Debt Securities. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities, which shortens the amortization period for certain investments in callable debt securities purchased at a premium by requiring the premium be amortized to the earliest call date. Such guidance will impact how premiums are amortized on our available-for-sale investments. ASU 2017-08 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires the use of the modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition approach. We do not expect ASU 2017-08 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") to retained earnings for "stranded tax effects" resulting from certain U.S. tax reform enacted in December 2017. Such "stranded tax effects" were created when deferred tax assets and liabilities related to items in AOCI were remeasured at the lower U.S. corporate tax rate in the period of enactment. ASU 2018-02 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted. The guidance in this ASU is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. corporate tax rate was recognized. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2017-082018-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Collaborative Arrangements. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606, which clarifies when transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement are within the scope of the FASB's new revenue standard (Topic 606). Such guidance clarifies revenue recognition and financial statement presentation for transactions between collaboration participants. ASU 2018-18 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires retrospective application to the date we adopted Topic 606, December 31, 2017. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2018-18 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and we have not determined if we will early adopt.

(2) Business AcquisitionsRevenue Recognition

Siemens Health ServicesIn May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 replaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. The new standard introduces a five-step process to be followed in determining the amount and timing of revenue recognition. It also provides guidance on accounting for costs incurred to obtain or fulfill contracts with customers, and establishes disclosure requirements which are more extensive than those required under prior U.S. GAAP.


ASU 2014-09, as amended ("Topic 606"), was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. We selected the modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method of adoption. Such method provides that the cumulative effect from prior periods upon applying the new guidance to contracts which were not complete as of the adoption date be recognized in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, including an adjustment to retained earnings. A summary of such cumulative effect adjustment is as follows:

(In thousands)  
Increase /
(Decrease)
    
Receivables, net  $(79,492)
Prepaid expenses and other  (2,253)
Other assets  81,157
Accounts payable  (9,361)
Deferred income taxes  1,173
Retained earnings  7,600

Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. The impact of applying Topic 606 (versus prior U.S. GAAP) increased 2018 revenues and earnings before income taxes by $207 million and $101 million, respectively. This impact is primarily driven by certain new contracts in 2018, which include certain specified upgrades for which we are required to estimate stand-alone selling price when allocating transaction consideration to performance obligations. Under prior U.S. GAAP, we would not have been able to establish vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE") of fair value for such items, and thus would have delayed the timing of revenue recognition for such contracts.

The application of Topic 606 (versus prior U.S. GAAP) did not have a significant impact on other line items in our consolidated statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income, and statements of cash flows in 2018. Additionally, the application of Topic 606 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 29, 2018.

Revenue Recognition Policy

On February 2, 2015,We enter into contracts with customers that may include various combinations of our software solutions and related services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. The predominant model of customer procurement involves multiple deliverables and includes a software license agreement, project-related implementation and consulting services, software support, hosting services, and computer hardware. We allocate revenues to each performance obligation within an arrangement based on estimated relative stand-alone selling price. Revenue is then recognized for each performance obligation upon transfer of control of the software solution or services to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration we acquiredexpect to receive.

Generally, we recognize revenue under Topic 606 for each of our performance obligations as follows:

Perpetual software licenses - We recognize perpetual software license revenues when control of such licenses are transferred to the client ("point in time"). We determine the amount of consideration allocated to this performance obligation using the residual approach.

Software as a service - We recognize software as a service ratably over the related hosting period ("over time").

Time-based software and content license fees - We recognize a license component of time-based software and content license fees upon delivery to the client ("point in time") and a non-license component (i.e. support) ratably over the respective contract term ("over time").

Hosting - Remote hosting recurring services are recognized ratably over the hosting service period ("over time"). Certain of our hosting arrangements contain fees deemed to be a "material right" under Topic 606. We recognize such fees over the term that will likely affect the client's decision about whether to renew the related hosting service ("over time").

Services - We recognize revenue for fixed fee services arrangements over time, utilizing a labor hours input method. For fee-for-service arrangements, we recognize revenue over time as hours are worked at the rates clients are

invoiced, utilizing the "as invoiced" practical expedient available in Topic 606. For stand-ready services arrangements, we recognize revenue ratably over the related service period.

Support and maintenance - We recognize support and maintenance fees ratably over the related contract period ("over time").

Hardware - We recognize hardware revenues when control of such hardware/devices is transferred to the client ("point in time").

Transaction processing - We recognize transaction processing revenues ratably as we provide such services ("over time").

Such revenues are recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents revenues disaggregated by our business models:

 For the Years Ended
 2018 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
(In thousands)Domestic
Segment
Global
Segment
Total Domestic
Segment
Global
Segment
Total Domestic
Segment
Global
Segment
Total
            
Licensed software$573,034
$40,544
$613,578
 $563,524
$48,666
$612,190
 $499,422
$49,697
$549,119
Technology resale208,722
36,354
245,076
 248,524
25,069
273,593
 246,694
27,781
274,475
Subscriptions300,555
25,154
325,709
 446,426
22,963
469,389
 416,311
26,057
442,368
Professional services1,574,407
237,056
1,811,463
 1,393,056
198,793
1,591,849
 1,251,726
192,852
1,444,578
Managed services1,060,081
94,860
1,154,941
 970,609
76,523
1,047,132
 909,584
71,993
981,577
Support and maintenance921,336
196,780
1,118,116
 856,304
190,352
1,046,656
 838,745
177,066
1,015,811
Reimbursed travel92,131
5,311
97,442
 96,728
4,735
101,463
 82,615
5,930
88,545
            
Total revenues$4,730,266
$636,059
$5,366,325
 $4,575,171
$567,101
$5,142,272
 $4,245,097
$551,376
$4,796,473
            
(1)As noted above, prior period amounts were not adjusted upon our adoption of Topic 606.
    

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by timing of revenue recognition:

 For the Year Ended
 2018
(In thousands)
Domestic
Segment
Global
Segment
Total
    
Revenue recognized over time$4,271,934
$569,780
$4,841,714
Revenue recognized at a point in time458,332
66,279
524,611
    
Total revenues$4,730,266
$636,059
$5,366,325



Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations

As of December 29, 2018, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) for executed contracts approximates $15.25 billion, of which we expect to recognize approximately 29% of the revenue over the next 12 months and the remainder thereafter.

Contract Liabilities

Our payment arrangements with clients typically include an initial payment due upon contract signing and date-based licensed software payment terms and payments based upon delivery for services, hardware and sublicensed software. Customer payments received in advance of satisfaction of the related performance obligations are deferred as contract liabilities. Such amounts are classified in our consolidated balance sheets as deferred revenue. During 2018, substantially all of our contract liability balance at the assets, and assumed certain liabilitiesbeginning of Siemens Health Services, the health information technology business unit of Siemens AG,such period was recognized in revenues.

Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a stock corporation established under the laws of Germany, and its affiliates. Siemens Health Services offered a portfolio of enterprise-level clinical and financial health care information technology solutions, as well as departmental, connectivity, population health, and care coordination solutions globally. Solutions were offered on the Soarian®, INVISION®, and i.s.h.med® platforms, among others. Siemens Health Services also offered a range of complementary services, including support, hosting, managed services, implementation services, and strategic consulting.Contract

We have determined the only significant incremental costs incurred to obtain contracts with clients within the scope of Topic 606 are sales commissions paid to our associates. We record sales commissions as an asset, and amortize to expense ratably over the remaining performance periods of the related contracts with remaining performance obligations. At December 29, 2018, our consolidated balance sheet includes an $86 million asset related to sales commissions to be expensed in future periods, which is included in other assets.

In 2018, we recognized $41 million of amortization related to this sales commissions asset, which is included in costs of revenue in our consolidated statements of operations.

Significant Judgments when Applying Topic 606

Our contracts with clients typically include various combinations of our software solutions and related services. Determining whether such software solutions and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together may require significant judgment. Specifically, judgment is required to determine whether software licenses are distinct from services and hosting included in an arrangement.

Contract transaction price is allocated to performance obligations using estimated stand-alone selling price. Judgment is required in estimating stand-alone selling price for each distinct performance obligation. We determine stand-alone selling price maximizing observable inputs such as stand-alone sales when they exist or substantive renewal prices charged to clients. In instances where stand-alone selling price is not observable, we utilize an estimate of stand-alone selling price. Such estimates are derived from various methods that include: cost plus margin, historical pricing practices, and the residual approach, which requires a considerable amount of judgment.

The labor hours input method used for our fixed fee services performance obligation is dependent on our ability to reliably estimate the direct labor hours to complete a project, which may span several years. We utilize our historical project experience and detailed planning process as a basis for our future estimates to complete current projects.

Certain of our arrangements contain variable consideration. We do not believe our estimates of variable consideration to be significant to our determination of revenue recognition.

Practical Expedients

We have reflected the acquisition enhancesaggregate effect of all contract modifications occurring prior to the Topic 606 adoption date when (i) identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, (ii) determining the transaction price, and (iii) allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations.

Revenue Recognition - 2017 and Prior

Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, we recognized software related revenue in accordance with the provisions of ASC 985-605, Software - Revenue Recognition and non-software related revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. In general, revenue was recognized when all of the following criteria were met:
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed;

Delivery had occurred or services had been rendered;
Our fee was fixed or determinable; and
Collection of the revenue was reasonably assured.

For multiple element arrangements that contained software and non-software elements, we allocated revenue to software and software-related elements as a group and any non-software element separately. After the arrangement consideration had been allocated to the non-software elements, revenue was recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria were met for each element. For the group of software and software-related elements, revenue was recognized under the guidance applicable to software transactions.
Since we did not have VSOE of fair value on software licenses within our organic growth opportunitiesmultiple element arrangements, we recognized revenue on our software and software-related elements using the residual method. Under the residual method, license revenue was recognized in a multiple-element arrangement when VSOE of fair value existed for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement, when software was delivered, installed and all other conditions to revenue recognition were met. We allocated revenue to each undelivered element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element's respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element was sold separately. Specifically, we determined the fair value of (i) the software support, hardware maintenance, sublicensed software support, remote hosting, subscriptions and software as a service portions of the arrangement based on the substantive renewal price for those services charged to clients; (ii) the professional services (including training and consulting) portion of the arrangement based on the hourly rates that we charged for these services when sold apart from a software license; and (iii) the sublicensed software based on its price when sold separately from the software. The residual amount of the fee after allocating revenue to the fair value of the undelivered elements was attributed to the licenses for software solutions. If evidence of the fair value could not be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement using VSOE, the entire amount of revenue under the arrangement was deferred until those elements were delivered or VSOE of fair value was established.
We also entered into arrangements that included multiple non-software deliverables. For each element in a multiple element arrangement that did not contain software-related elements to be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting, the following were met: the delivered products or services had value to the client on a stand-alone basis; and for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered products or services, delivery or performance of the undelivered product or service was considered probable and is substantially controlled by the Company. We allocated the arrangement consideration to each element based on the selling price hierarchy of VSOE of fair value, if it provides usexisted, or third-party evidence ("TPE") of selling price. If neither VSOE nor TPE were available, we used estimated selling price.
For certain arrangements, revenue for software, implementation services and, in certain cases, support services for which VSOE of fair value could not be established were accounted for as a larger base intosingle unit of accounting. If VSOE of fair value could not be established for both the implementation services and the support services, the entire arrangement fee was recognized ratably over the period during which the implementation services were expected to be performed or the support period, whichever was longer, beginning with delivery of the software, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria were met.

(3) Receivables

Receivables consist of client receivables and the current portion of amounts due under sales-type leases.

Client receivables represent recorded revenues that have either been billed, or for which we can sellhave an unconditional right to invoice and receive payment in the future. We periodically provide long-term financing options to creditworthy clients through extended payment terms. Generally, these extended payment terms provide for date-based payments over a fixed period, not to exceed the term of the overall arrangement. Thus, our combined portfolio of solutionsclient contracts contains a financing component, which is recognized over time as a component of other income, net in our consolidated statements of operations.

Lease receivables represent our net investment in sales-type leases resulting from the sale of certain health care devices to our clients.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients and services.generally do not require collateral from our clients. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts based on specific identification, historical experience and our judgment.


A summary of net receivables is as follows:
(In thousands)2018 2017
    
Client receivables$1,237,127
 $1,082,886
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts64,561
 52,786
    
Client receivables, net of allowance1,172,566
 1,030,100
    
Current portion of lease receivables10,928
 12,681
    
Total receivables, net$1,183,494
 $1,042,781

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of our allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
(in thousands)2018 2017 2016
      
Allowance for doubtful accounts - beginning balance$52,786
 $43,028
 $48,119
Additions charged to costs and expenses25,529
 29,248
 5,060
Deductions(a)
(13,754) (19,490) (10,151)
      
Allowance for doubtful accounts - ending balance$64,561
 $52,786
 $43,028
      
(a) Deductions in 2017 include a $13 million reclassification to other non-current assets.
     

Lease receivables represent our net investment in sales-type leases resulting from the sale of certain health care devices to our clients. The acquisition also augmentscomponents of our non-U.S. footprintnet investment in sales-type leases are as follows:
(In thousands)2018 2017
    
Minimum lease payments receivable$11,854
 $20,425
Less: Unearned income926
 1,447
    
Total lease receivables10,928
 18,978
    
Less: Long-term receivables included in other assets
 6,297
    
Current portion of lease receivables$10,928
 $12,681

During the second quarter of 2008, Fujitsu Services Limited's ("Fujitsu") contract as the prime contractor in the National Health Service ("NHS") initiative to automate clinical processes and growth opportunities, increasesdigitize medical records in the Southern region of England was terminated. This gave rise to the termination of our abilitysubcontract for the project. We continue to be in dispute with Fujitsu regarding Fujitsu's obligation to pay amounts due upon termination, including our client receivables and scaledamages for R&D investment,pre-termination losses. Part of the process required final resolution of disputes between Fujitsu and added over 5,000 highly-skilled associates that enhance our capabilities. These factors, combinedthe NHS regarding the prime contract termination, which has now occurred. In 2018 we initiated the formal dispute resolution procedure under the subcontract, with the synergiesnon-binding alternative dispute resolution procedures concluding in the fourth quarter of 2018. The Company must now resolve the issues based on the formal processes provided for in the subcontract. In the fourth quarter of 2018 we recorded a pre-tax charge of $45 million to provide an allowance against the disputed client receivables, reflecting the uncertainty in collection of such receivables and economies of scale expectedrelated litigation risk resulting from combining the operations of Cerner and Siemens Health Services, are the basis for acquisition and comprise the resulting goodwill recorded.

Consideration for the acquisition was $1.39 billion of cash, consistingconclusion of the $1.3 billion agreed upon purchase price plus working capital and certain other adjustments under the Master Sale and Purchase Agreement ("MSPA") dated August 5, 2014, as amended.
We incurrednon-binding alternative dispute resolution procedures. Such pre-tax costs of $22 million in 2015 in connection with our acquisition of Siemens Health Services, which arecharge is included in generalsales and administrativeclient service expense in our consolidated statements of operations.
The acquisition As of Siemens Health Services was treated as a purchaseDecember 29, 2018, it remains unlikely that our matter with Fujitsu will be resolved in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires allocationthe next 12 months. Therefore, these client receivables remain classified in other long-term assets at December 29, 2018. While the ultimate collectability of the purchase priceclient receivables pursuant to this process is uncertain, we believe that we have valid and equitable grounds for recovery of such amounts. Nevertheless, it is possible that our estimates regarding collectability of such amounts might materially change as the estimated fair valuesparties proceed through the formal phases of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction.subcontract dispute resolution procedure.

During 2018 and 2017, we received total client cash collections of $5.49 billion and $5.44 billion, respectively.

The final allocation(4) Investments

Available-for-sale investments at the end of purchase price was2018 were as follows:
(in thousands) Allocation Amount Estimated Weighted Average Useful Life
Receivables, net of allowances of $34,191 $226,207
  
Other current assets 46,682
  
Property and equipment 158,324
 20 years
Goodwill 532,327
  
Intangible assets:    
Customer relationships 371,000
 10 years
Existing technologies 201,990
 5 years
Trade names 39,990
 8 years
Total intangible assets 612,980
  
Other non-current assets 5,212
  
Accounts payable (42,306)  
Deferred revenue (current) (85,314)  
Other current liabilities (12,853)  
Deferred revenue (non-current) (48,130)  
     
Total purchase price $1,393,129
  

The intangible assets in the table above are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, with such amortization included in amortization of acquisition-related intangibles in our consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value measurements of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities were based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value measurement hierarchy. Level 3 inputs included, among others, discount rates that we estimated would be used by a market participant in valuing these assets and liabilities, projections of revenues and cash flows, client attrition rates, royalty rates, and market comparables.
Property and equipment was valued primarily using the sales comparison method, a form of the market approach, in which the value is derived by evaluating the market prices of assets with comparable features such as size, location, condition and age. Our analysis included multiple property categories, including land, buildings, and personal property and included assumptions for market prices of comparable assets, and physical and economic obsolescence, among others.
Customer relationship intangible assets were valued using the excess earnings method, a form of the income approach, in which the value is derived by estimation of the after-tax cash flows specifically attributable to the customer relationships. Our analysis consisted of two customer categories, order backlog and existing customer relationships and included assumptions for projections of revenues and expenses, contributory asset charges, discount rates, and a tax amortization benefit, among others.
Existing technology and trade name intangible assets were valued using the relief from royalty method, a form of the income approach, in which the value is derived by estimation of the after-tax royalty savings attributable to owning the assets. Assumptions in these analyses included projections of revenues, royalty rates representing costs avoided due to ownership of the assets, discount rates, and a tax amortization benefit.
Deferred revenue was valued using an income approach, in which the value was derived by estimation of the fulfillment cost, plus a normal profit margin (which excludes any selling margin), for performance obligations assumed in the acquisition. Assumptions included estimations of costs incurred to fulfill the obligations, profit margins a market participant would expect to receive, and a discount rate.
The goodwill of $532 million was allocated among our Domestic and Global operating segments, and is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Refer to Note (7) for additional information on goodwill.

Our consolidated statements of operations include revenues of approximately $930 million attributable to the acquired business (now referred to as "Cerner Health Services") in 2015. Disclosure of the earnings contribution from the Cerner Health Services business in 2015 is not practicable, as we had already integrated operations in many areas.

The following table provides unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended January 2, 2016, as if the acquisition had been completed prior to our 2015 fiscal year.

(In thousands, except per share data)  
   
Pro forma revenues $4,518,947
Pro forma net earnings 546,027
Pro forma diluted earnings per share 1.56

These pro forma results are based on estimates and assumptions, which we believe are reasonable. They are not the results that would have been realized had we been a combined company during the periods presented, nor are they indicative of our consolidated results of operations in future periods. The pro forma results for the 2015 year include pre-tax adjustments for amortization of intangible assets, fair value adjustments for deferred revenue, and the elimination of acquisition costs of $7 million, $6 million and $22 million, respectively.

Lee's Summit Tech Center

On December 17, 2015, we purchased real estate interests, in-place tenant leases, and certain other assets associated with the property commonly referred to as the Summit Technology Campus, located in Lee's Summit, Missouri. The acquired property (now referred to as the "Lee's Summit Tech Center") consists of a 550,000 square foot multi-tenant office building. We expect to utilize this space to support our data center and office space needs. Consideration for the Lee's Summit Tech Center was $86 million, consisting of $85 million of up-front cash plus contingent consideration of $1 million paid in 2017.

The acquisition of the Lee's Summit Tech Center was treated as a purchase in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The final allocation of purchase price resulted in the allocation of $86 million to property and equipment, net in our consolidated balance sheets. The in-place tenant leases had a de minimis impact on the allocation of purchase price. No goodwill resulted from the transaction.

(3) Investments
(In thousands) Adjusted Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
         
Cash equivalents:        
Money market funds $76,471
 $
 $
 $76,471
Time deposits 71,461
 
 
 71,461
Commercial paper 10,000
 
 
 10,000
Total cash equivalents 157,932
 
 
 157,932
         
Short-term investments:        
Time deposits 31,947
 
 
 31,947
Commercial paper 75,445
 
 (91) 75,354
Government and corporate bonds 294,941
 1
 (958) 293,984
Total short-term investments 402,333
 1
 (1,049) 401,285
         
Long-term investments:        
Government and corporate bonds 18,247
 
 (55) 18,192
         
Total available-for-sale investments $578,512
 $1
 $(1,104) $577,409

Available-for-sale investments at the end of 2017 were as follows:
(In thousands) Adjusted Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
         
Cash equivalents:        
Money market funds $99,472
 $
 $
 $99,472
Time deposits 60,226
 
 
 60,226
Government and corporate bonds 850
 
 
 850
Total cash equivalents 160,548
 
 
 160,548
         
Short-term investments:        
Time deposits 40,186
 
 
 40,186
Commercial paper 147,646
 2
 (139) 147,509
Government and corporate bonds 247,626
 
 (477) 247,149
Total short-term investments 435,458
 2
 (616) 434,844
         
Long-term investments:        
Government and corporate bonds 185,478
 
 (1,026) 184,452
         
Total available-for-sale investments $781,484
 $2
 $(1,642) $779,844

Available-for-sale investments at the end of 2016 were as follows:
(In thousands) Adjusted Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
         
Cash equivalents:        
Money market funds $23,110
 $
 $
 $23,110
Time deposits 11,477
 
 
 11,477
Total cash equivalents 34,587
 
 
 34,587
         
Short-term investments:        
Time deposits 40,639
 
 
 40,639
Commercial paper 22,325
 
 (24) 22,301
Government and corporate bonds 122,729
 3
 (84) 122,648
Total short-term investments 185,693
 3
 (108) 185,588
         
Long-term investments:        
Government and corporate bonds 95,806
 
 (438) 95,368
         
Total available-for-sale investments $316,086
 $3
 $(546) $315,543

Investments reported under the cost method of accounting as of December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $11$277 million and $12$11 million, respectively. Investments reported under the equity method of accounting were $5 million and $2 million at bothDecember 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively.

We sold available-for-sale investments for proceeds of $45 million and $29 million in 2018 and $245 million in 2017, and 2016, respectively, resulting in insignificant gains/losses in each period.


(4)Essence Group Holdings Corporation

On July 27, 2018, we acquired a minority interest in Essence Group Holdings Corporation ("Essence Group") for cash consideration of $266 million under a Stock Purchase Agreement ("SPA") dated July 9, 2018. Such investment is presented in long-term investments in our consolidated balance sheets and is accounted for under the cost method of accounting.

Concurrently with the execution of the SPA, we announced a strategic operating relationship with Lumeris Healthcare Outcomes, LLC ("Lumeris"), a subsidiary of Essence Group, pursuant to which we will collaborate to bring to market an EHR-agnostic offering, Maestro AdvantageTM, designed to help providers who participate in value-based arrangements, including Medicare Advantage and provider-sponsored health plans, control costs and improve outcomes. Additionally, we sold certain solutions to Lumeris for an aggregate contract value of $28 million, of which we recognized $5 million as revenue in 2018.

(5) Fair Value Measurements

We determine fair value measurements used in our consolidated financial statements based upon the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’sentity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
 
Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The following table details our financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis at the end of 20172018: 
(In thousands)        
 
 Fair Value Measurements Using 
 Fair Value Measurements Using
Description Balance Sheet Classification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance Sheet Classification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
            
Money market funds Cash equivalents $99,472
 $
 $
 Cash equivalents $76,471
 $
 $
Time deposits Cash equivalents 
 60,226
 
 Cash equivalents 
 71,461
 
Government and corporate bonds Cash equivalents 
 850
 
Commercial paper Cash equivalents 
 10,000
 
Time deposits Short-term investments 
 40,186
 
 Short-term investments 
 31,947
 
Commercial paper Short-term investments 
 147,509
 
 Short-term investments 
 75,354
 
Government and corporate bonds Short-term investments 
 247,149
 
 Short-term investments 
 293,984
 
Government and corporate bonds Long-term investments 
 184,452
 
 Long-term investments 
 18,192
 

The following table details our financial assets measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis at the end of 20162017:
(In thousands)        
 Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Measurements Using
Description Balance Sheet Classification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance Sheet Classification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
            
Money market funds Cash equivalents $23,110
 $
 $
 Cash equivalents $99,472
 $
 $
Time deposits Cash equivalents 
 11,477
 
 Cash equivalents 
 60,226
 
Government and corporate bonds Cash equivalents 
 850
 
Time deposits Short-term investments 
 40,639
 
 Short-term investments 
 40,186
 
Commercial paper Short-term investments 
 22,301
 
 Short-term investments 
 147,509
 
Government and corporate bonds Short-term investments 
 122,648
 
 Short-term investments 
 247,149
 
Government and corporate bonds Long-term investments 
 95,368
 
 Long-term investments 
 184,452
 
We estimate the fair value of our long-term, fixed rate debt using a Level 3 discounted cash flow analysis based on current borrowing rates for debt with similar maturities. We estimate the fair value of our long-term, variable rate debt using a Level 3 discounted cash flow analysis based on LIBOR rate forward curves. The fair value of our long-term debt, including current maturities, at the end of 20172018 and 20162017 was approximately $519$431 million and $515$519 million, respectively. The carrying amount of such debt at the end of both2018 and 2017 was $425 million and 2016 was $500 million.million, respectively.

(5) Receivables

Receivables consist of accounts receivable and the current portion of amounts due under sales-type leases. Accounts receivable primarily represent recorded revenues that have been billed. Billings and other consideration received on contracts in excess of related revenues recognized are recorded as deferred revenue. Substantially all receivables are derived from sales and related support and maintenance and professional services of our clinical, administrative and financial information systems and solutions to health care providers.

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our clients and generally do not require collateral from our clients. We provide an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts based on specific identification, historical experience and our judgment.

A summary of net receivables is as follows:
(In thousands)2017 2016
    
Gross accounts receivable$1,082,886
 $958,843
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts52,786
 43,028
    
Accounts receivable, net of allowance1,030,100
 915,815
    
Current portion of lease receivables12,681
 29,128
    
Total receivables, net$1,042,781
 $944,943

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of our allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
(in thousands)2017 2016 2015
      
Allowance for doubtful accounts - beginning balance$43,028
 $48,119
 $25,531
Additions charged to costs and expenses29,248
 5,060
 2,317
Additions through acquisitions
 
 34,159
Deductions(a)
(19,490) (10,151) (13,888)
      
Allowance for doubtful accounts - ending balance$52,786
 $43,028
 $48,119
      
(a) Deductions in 2017 include a $13 million reclassification to other non-current assets.
     

Lease receivables represent our net investment in sales-type leases resulting from the sale of certain health care devices to our clients. The components of our net investment in sales-type leases are as follows:
(In thousands)2017 2016
    
Minimum lease payments receivable$20,425
 $59,171
Less: Unearned income1,447
 2,253
    
Total lease receivables18,978
 56,918
    
Less: Long-term receivables included in other assets6,297
 27,790
    
Current portion of lease receivables$12,681
 $29,128

During the second quarter of 2008, Fujitsu Services Limited's ("Fujitsu") contract as the prime contractor in the National Health Service ("NHS") initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in the Southern region of England was terminated by the NHS. This had the effect of automatically terminating our subcontract for the project. We continue to be in dispute with Fujitsu regarding Fujitsu’s obligation to pay the amounts comprised of accounts receivable and contracts receivable related to that subcontract, and we are working with Fujitsu to resolve these issues based on processes provided for in the contract. Part of that process requires final resolution of disputes between Fujitsu and the NHS regarding the contract termination. As of December 30, 2017, it remains unlikely that our matter with Fujitsu will be resolved in the next 12 months. Therefore, these receivables have been classified as long-term and represent less than the majority of other long-term assets at the end of 2017 and 2016. While the ultimate collectability of the receivables pursuant to this process is

uncertain, we believe that we have valid and equitable grounds for recovery of such amounts and that collection of recorded amounts is probable. Nevertheless, it is reasonably possible that our estimates regarding collectability of such amounts might materially change in the near term, considering that we do not have complete knowledge of the status of the proceedings between Fujitsu and NHS and their effect on our claims.

During 2017 and 2016, we received total client cash collections of $5.4 billion and $5.2 billion, respectively.
 
(6) Property and Equipment

A summary of property, equipment and leasehold improvements stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, is as follows:
(In thousands)Depreciable Lives (Yrs) 2017 2016Depreciable Lives (Yrs) 2018 2017
        
Computer and communications equipment15 $1,511,445
 $1,363,799
15 $1,686,747
 $1,511,445
Land, buildings and improvements1250 1,051,658
 961,550
1250 1,239,122
 1,051,658
Leasehold improvements115 216,586
 226,471
115 214,697
 216,586
Furniture and fixtures512 123,945
 102,151
512 132,180
 123,945
Capital lease equipment35 3,197
 3,197
35 
 3,197
Other equipment320 1,161
 1,398
320 1,255
 1,161
        
 2,907,992
 2,658,566
 3,274,001
 2,907,992
        
Less accumulated depreciation and leasehold amortization 1,304,673
 1,106,042
 1,530,426
 1,304,673
        
Total property and equipment, net $1,603,319
 $1,552,524
 $1,743,575
 $1,603,319

Depreciation and leasehold amortization expense for 20172018, 20162017 and 20152016 was $290$323 million, $246290 million and $217246 million, respectively.

(7) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill were as follows:
(In thousands)Domestic Global TotalDomestic Global Total
     
Balance at the end of 2015$730,837
 $68,345
 $799,182
Purchase price allocation adjustments for Cerner Health Services51,827
 (4,887) 46,940
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
 (1,922) (1,922)
          
Balance at the end of 2016782,664
 61,536
 844,200
$782,664
 $61,536
 $844,200
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
 8,805
 8,805

 8,805
 8,805
          
Balance at the end of 2017$782,664
 $70,341
 $853,005
782,664
 70,341
 853,005
Foreign currency translation adjustment and other
 (5,461) (5,461)
     
Balance at the end of 2018$782,664
 $64,880
 $847,544


A summary of net intangible assets is as follows:
2017 20162018 2017
(In thousands)Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated AmortizationGross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization
              
Customer lists$472,697
 $195,190
 $469,353
 $153,750
$465,909
 $229,545
 $472,697
 $195,190
Purchased software369,728
 282,141
 368,174
 225,754
361,964
 311,738
 369,728
 282,141
Internal use software114,574
 60,924
 87,966
 47,325
143,520
 78,633
 114,574
 60,924
Trade names41,224
 16,961
 40,583
 11,156
40,025
 21,275
 41,224
 16,961
Other46,581
 9,835
 44,844
 6,888
47,905
 12,827
 46,581
 9,835
              
Total$1,044,804
 $565,051
 $1,010,920
 $444,873
$1,059,323
 $654,018
 $1,044,804
 $565,051
              
Intangible assets, net  $479,753
   $566,047
  $405,305
   $479,753

Amortization expense for 20172018, 20162017 and 20152016 was $118$109 million, $118 million and $116118 million, respectively.

Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows:
(In thousands)  
  
2018$106,507
2019102,416
$113,566
202059,355
65,184
202152,929
58,314
202247,703
53,071
202343,927

(8) Software Development

Information regarding our software development costs is included in the following table:
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Software development costs$705,944
 $704,882
 $685,260
$747,128
 $705,944
 $704,882
Capitalized software development costs(274,148) (293,696) (264,656)(273,693) (274,148) (293,696)
Amortization of capitalized software development costs173,250
 140,232
 119,195
210,228
 173,250
 140,232
          
Total software development expense$605,046
 $551,418
 $539,799
$683,663
 $605,046
 $551,418

Accumulated amortization as of the end of 20172018 and 20162017 was $1.3$1.5 billion and $1.11.3 billion, respectively.


(9) Long-term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

The following is a summary of indebtedness outstanding:
(In thousands)2017 20162018 2017
      
Senior Notes$500,000
 $500,000
$425,000
 $500,000
Capital lease obligations13,068
 50,444
4,914
 13,068
Other14,162
 13,921
14,162
 14,162
      
Debt and capital lease obligations527,230
 564,365
444,076
 527,230
Less: debt issuance costs(515) (616)(360) (515)
      
Debt and capital lease obligations, net526,715
 563,749
443,716
 526,715
Less: current portion(11,585) (26,197)(4,914) (11,585)
      
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations$515,130
 $537,552
$438,802
 $515,130

Senior Notes

In January 2015, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured Senior Notes ("Senior Notes"), pursuant to a Master Note Purchase Agreement dated December 4, 2014. The issuance consisted of $225 million of 3.18% Series 2015-A Notes due February 15, 2022, $200 million of 3.58% Series 2015-B Notes due February 14, 2025, and $75 million in floating rate Series 2015-C Notes due February 15, 2022. Interest is payable semiannually on February 15th and August 15th in each year, commencing on August 15, 2015 for the Series 2015-A Notes and Series 2015-B Notes. The Series 2015-C Notes will accrue interest at a floating rate equal to the Adjusted LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Master Note Purchase Agreement), payable quarterly on February 15th, May 15th, August 15th and November 15th in each year, commencing on May 15, 2015. As of December 30, 2017, the interest rate for the current interest period was 2.42% based on the three-month floating LIBOR rate. The debt issuance costs in the table above relate to the issuance of these Senior Notes. The Master Note Purchase Agreement contains certain leverage and interest coverage ratio covenants and provides certain restrictions on our ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets, and other customary terms. Proceeds from the Senior Notes are available for general corporate purposes.

In March 2018, we repaid our $75 million floating rate Series 2015-C Notes due February 15, 2022.

Capital Leases

Our capital lease obligations are primarily related to the procurement of hardware and health care devices.

Other

Other indebtedness includes estimated amounts payable through September 2025, under an agreement entered into in September 2015.

Credit Facility

In October 2015, we amended and restated our revolving credit facility. The amended facility provides a $100 million unsecured revolving line of credit for working capital purposes, which includes a letter of credit facility, expiring in October 2020. We have the ability to increase the maximum capacity to $200 million at any time during the facility’sfacility's term, subject to lender participation. Interest is payable at a rate based on prime, LIBOR, or the U.S. federal funds rate, plus a spread that varies depending on the leverage ratios maintained. The agreement provides certain restrictions on our ability to borrow, incur liens, sell assets and pay dividends and contains certain cash flow and liquidity covenants. As of the end of 2017,2018, we had no outstanding borrowings under this facility; however, we had $52$30 million of outstanding letters of credit, which reduced our available borrowing capacity to $48$70 million.

Covenant Compliance

As of December 30, 2017,29, 2018, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.


Minimum annual payments under existing capital lease obligations and maturities of indebtedness outstanding at the end of 20172018 are as follows:
Capital Lease Obligations      Capital Lease Obligations      
(In thousands)Minimum Lease Payments Less: Interest  Principal Senior Notes Other  TotalMinimum Lease Payments Less: Interest  Principal Senior Notes Other  Total
                      
2018$11,921
 $336
 $11,585
 $
 $
 $11,585
20191,526
 43
 1,483
 
 2,500
 3,983
$5,057
 $143
 $4,914
 $
 $
 $4,914
2020
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 2,500
 2,500
2021
 
 
 
 1,100
 1,100

 
 
 
 
 
2022
 
 
 300,000
 1,700
 301,700

 
 
 225,000
 1,100
 226,100
2023 and thereafter
 
 
 200,000
 8,862
 208,862
2023
 
 
 
 1,700
 1,700
2024 and thereafter
 
 
 200,000
 8,862
 208,862
                      
Total$13,447
 $379
 $13,068
 $500,000
 $14,162
 $527,230
$5,057
 $143
 $4,914
 $425,000
 $14,162
 $444,076

(10) Contingencies

We accrue estimates for resolution of any legal and other contingencies when losses are probable and reasonably estimable, in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies.

The terms of our software license agreements with our clients generally provide for a limited indemnification of such clients against losses, expenses and liabilities arising from third party claims based on alleged infringement by our solutions of an intellectual property right of such third party. The terms of such indemnification often limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations and generally include a right to replace or modify an infringing solution. To date, we have not had to reimburse any of our clients for any judgments or settlements to third parties related to these indemnification provisions pertaining to intellectual property infringement claims. For several reasons, including the lack of a sufficient number of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases under the terms of the corresponding agreements with our clients, we cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.

Refer to Note (3) with regard to our dispute with Fujitsu.

In addition to commitments and obligations in the ordinary course of business, we are subject toinvolved in various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including for example, employment and client disputes and litigation alleging solution and implementation defects, personal injury, intellectual property infringement, violations of law and breaches of contract and warranties. In addition, we are a defendant in lawsuits filed in federal and state courts brought as putative class or collective actions on behalfMany of various groups of current and former associates in the U.S. alleging that we misclassified associates as exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws. Thesethese proceedings are at various proceduralpreliminary stages and many seek unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys' fees. Given the substantial uncertainties, such as the impactan indeterminate amount of discovery and the extent to which significant factual issues are resolved, the disposition of pre-trial motions, the extent of potential damages that are often unspecified or indeterminate, and the status of settlement discussions, we cannot predict with any reasonable certainty the timing or outcome of such contingencies.damages. At this time, we do not believe any materialthe range of potential losses under thesesuch claims to be probable or estimable.material to our consolidated financial statements.

No less than quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. We accrue a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any legal proceeding or claim is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether the amount of an exposure is reasonably estimable, and accruals are based only on the information available to our management at the time the judgment is made. Furthermore, the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, and we may incur substantial defense costs and expenses defending any of these matters. Should any one or a combination of more than one of these proceedings be successful, or should we determine to settle any one or a combination of these matters, we may be required to pay substantial sums, become subject to the entry of an injunction or be forced to change the manner in which we operate our business, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.


(11) Other Income

A summary of non-operating income and expense is as follows:
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Interest income$18,933
 $15,252
 $11,990
$34,211
 $18,933
 $15,252
Interest expense(8,012) (4,479) (11,820)(7,987) (8,012) (4,479)
Other(4,263) (3,352) 74
(158) (4,263) (3,352)
          
Other income, net$6,658
 $7,421
 $244
$26,066
 $6,658
 $7,421

(12) Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) for 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 consists of the following:
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Current:          
Federal$37,708
 $252,795
 $140,921
$89,551
 $37,708
 $252,795
State4,878
 31,642
 18,647
24,804
 4,878
 31,642
Foreign10,156
 9,030
 17,205
22,009
 10,156
 9,030
Total current expense52,742
 293,467
 176,773
136,364
 52,742
 293,467
Deferred:          
Federal13,676
 (18,014) 60,015
31,129
 13,676
 (18,014)
State23,278
 (2,103) 5,680
8,144
 23,278
 (2,103)
Foreign10,455
 8,600
 (450)(4,845) 10,455
 8,600
Total deferred expense (benefit)47,409
 (11,517) 65,245
34,428
 47,409
 (11,517)
          
Total income tax expense$100,151
 $281,950
 $242,018
$170,792
 $100,151
 $281,950

Our current federal and state tax expense decreased in 2017 relative to 2016 and 2015 due to favorable book vs. tax timing differences recognized in 2017, and the inclusion of net excess tax benefits as discrete items within the tax provision, upon our adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017. As a result of these timing differences, we are in a prepaid income tax position in the U.S. The increase in our prepaid tax position contributed significantly to the year-over-year increase in prepaid expenses and other in our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note (1) for further discussion regarding our adoption of ASU 2016-09 and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities that give rise to significant portions of deferred income taxes at the end of 20172018 and 20162017 relate to the following:

(In thousands)2017 20162018 2017
      
Deferred tax assets:      
Accrued expenses$23,295
 $25,454
$31,273
 $23,295
Tax credits and separate return net operating losses26,304
 27,762
22,826
 26,304
Share based compensation56,263
 81,133
Contract and service revenues and costs
 59,217
Share-based compensation60,901
 56,263
Other17,754
 9,723
14,951
 17,754
Gross deferred tax assets129,951
 123,616
Less: Valuation Allowance(1,404) 
Total deferred tax assets123,616
 203,289
128,547
 123,616
      
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Software development costs(208,494) (275,888)(229,624) (208,494)
Depreciation and amortization(96,492) (133,424)(131,516) (96,492)
Prepaid expenses(21,214) (30,255)(39,154) (21,214)
Contract and service revenues and costs(65,043) 
(35,933) (65,043)
Other(10,400) (3,050)(6,199) (10,400)
Total deferred tax liabilities(401,643) (442,617)(442,426) (401,643)
      
Net deferred tax liability$(278,027) $(239,328)$(313,879) $(278,027)

At the end of 2017,2018, we had net operating loss carry-forwards from foreign jurisdictions of $29$30 million that are available to offset future taxable income with no expiration. In addition, we had a state income tax credit carry-forward of $14$12 million available to offset income tax liabilities through 2030. We expect to fully utilize the net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards in future periods. As a result

At the end of 2018, we had not provided tax on the cumulative undistributed earnings of certain federal tax accounting method changes,foreign subsidiaries of approximately $69 million, because it is our deferred tax amount for contract and services revenues and costs is aintention to reinvest these earnings indefinitely. The unrecognized deferred tax liability atrelating to these earnings is approximately $15 million.

The effective income tax rates for 2018, 2017, compared with a deferred tax asset in 2016.and 2016 were 21%, 10%, and 31%, respectively. These effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% for 2018 and 35% for 2017 and 2016 as follows:

 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)2018 2017 2016
      
Tax expense at statutory rates$168,179
 $338,495
 $321,452
State income tax, net of federal benefit25,321
 22,214
 22,644
Tax credits(19,737) (17,727) (23,881)
Foreign rate differential(4,851) (26,379) (16,468)
Share-based compensation(1,696) (62,501) 
Change in U.S. tax rate
 (170,999) 
Deemed mandatory repatriation
 25,114
 
Permanent differences6,224
 (10,700) (20,330)
Other, net(2,648) 2,634
 (1,467)
      
Total income tax expense$170,792
 $100,151
 $281,950
H.R. 1, An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018 ("U.S. Tax Reform"), was enacted on December 22, 2017. U.S. Tax reform provides for, among other things, the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of adjusting our net deferred tax liabilities to the new enacted rate, we recorded a decrease to the deferred tax liabilities of $171 million. As a result of the aforementioned federal tax accounting method changes, and other favorable book vs. tax timing differences recognized in 2017, the decrease in deferred tax liability rate was offset by additional future taxable amounts generated during 2017.

At the end of 2017, we had not provided tax on the cumulative undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries of approximately $62 million, because it is our intention to reinvest these earnings indefinitely. The unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to these earnings is approximately $13 million. As a result of U.S. Tax Reform, we recorded a deferred tax liability in 2017 for $4 million relating to earnings for which we previously maintained an indefinite reinvestment assertion. This revision to our assertion was caused by the changes to the consequences of future repatriation enacted with U.S. Tax Reform. As of December 30, 2017, we are making an indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to only certain of our foreign subsidiaries, whereas we previously maintained the assertion for all foreign subsidiaries.


The effective income tax rates for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were 10%, 31%, and 31%, respectively. These effective rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% as follows:
 For the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 2015
      
Tax expense at statutory rates$338,495
 $321,452
 $273,483
State income tax, net of federal benefit22,214
 22,644
 16,129
Tax credits(17,727) (23,881) (20,681)
Foreign rate differential(26,379) (16,468) (14,821)
Share-based compensation(62,501) 
 
Change in U.S. tax rate(170,999) 
 
Deemed mandatory repatriation25,114
 
 
Permanent differences(10,700) (20,330) (14,314)
Other, net2,634
 (1,467) 2,222
      
Total income tax expense$100,151
 $281,950
 $242,018
Upon our adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017, we include net excess tax benefits in our income tax provision. These net excess tax benefits are included within share-based compensation in the table above. Refer to Note (1) for further discussion regarding our adoption of ASU 2016-09 and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As reflected in the table above, our tax rate was impacted by the enactment of U.S. Tax Reform into law on December 22, 2017. The impact of U.S. Tax Reform on our 2017 tax

rate includes the impact of the revaluation of our net deferred tax liability to the lower enacted tax rate, and the impact of mandatory deemed repatriation.

Relevant accounting guidance provides that the impact of U.S. Tax Reform may be provisionally recorded, and adjusted during a measurement period of up to one year. The impacts of U.S. Tax Reform on our income2018 tax balances are complex and wide-reaching, andrate through the enactment date of such U.S. Tax Reform fell in close proximity to our 2017 fiscal year-end. Accordingly,reduced federal statutory tax rate, partially offset by the adjustments we have made to our deferred and current tax balances are provisional, and it is reasonably possible that our estimates regarding the impact of U.S. Tax Reform on our current and deferred tax balances might materially change in the near term. Our provisional adjustments include the reduction to our net deferred tax liability of $171 million as a resultrepeal of the federal rate reductionpermanent domestic production deduction and the $25 million liability recordedincreases to permanently nondeductible expenses, as a result of the mandatory deemed repatriation provisions.

Additional analysis and computations will be performed with respect to these provisional amounts. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to among other things, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, changes to assumptions and interpretations that we have made, and actions we may takewell as a result of U.S. Tax Reform. We will complete our accounting for these items during 2018, after completion of our 2017 U.S. income tax return.

U.S. Tax Reform creates new global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") tax provisions. The GILTI provisions require us to include in our future U.S. taxable income, the earnings of foreign subsidiaries in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiaries' tangible assets. This inclusion may be offset by a portion of the foreign taxes incurred on these earnings.inclusion. We have elected to account for GILTI tax in the period in which it is incurred, and therefore have not provided any deferred tax impacts of GILTI in our consolidated financial statements for 2017 or 2018.
Relevant accounting guidance provides that the year endedimpact of the enactment of U.S. Tax Reform may be provisionally recorded in 2017 and adjusted during a measurement period of up to one year. As of December 30, 2017.2017, we provisionally recorded certain impacts of U.S. Tax Reform including the adjustment to our net deferred tax liability arising from the reduction in the federal tax rate as well as the impact of mandatory deemed repatriation. Adjustments to these provisional amounts that we recorded in 2018 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. Our accounting for the effects of the enactment of U.S. Tax Reform is now complete.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefit is presented below:
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Unrecognized tax benefit - beginning balance$9,769
 $4,878
 $7,202
$15,287
 $9,769
 $4,878
Gross decreases - tax positions in prior periods(1,734) 
 (4,323)
 (1,734) 
Gross increases - tax positions in prior periods7,252
 
 690
1,591
 7,252
 
Gross increases - tax positions in current year
 6,945
 2,824
2,370
 
 6,945
Settlements
 (1,859) (1,299)(541) 
 (1,859)
Currency translation
 (195) (216)(19) 
 (195)
          
Unrecognized tax benefit - ending balance$15,287
 $9,769
 $4,878
$18,688
 $15,287
 $9,769

If recognized, $8$11 million of the unrecognized tax benefit will favorably impact our effective tax rate. It is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by up to $12$11 million within the next twelve months. Our federal returns have been examined by the Internal Revenue Service through 2013. 2014. Our federal returns are open for examination for 2015 and thereafter, and our 2016 return is currently under examination.We have various state and foreign returns under examination.

The ending amounts of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits were $3 million in 2018 and $2 million in 2017 and less than $1 million in 2016.2017. We classify interest and penalties as income tax expense in our consolidated statement of operations, and our income tax expense for 20172018 includes $1 million of interest and penalties.

The foreign portion of our earnings before income taxes was $89 million, $126 million, and $86 million in 2018, 2017, and $83 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively, and the remaining portion was domestic.

(13) Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations are as follows:
 
2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
Earnings Shares Per-Share Earnings Shares Per-Share Earnings Shares Per-ShareEarnings Shares Per-Share Earnings Shares Per-Share Earnings Shares Per-Share
(In thousands, except per share data)(Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount(Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount (Numerator) (Denominator) Amount
                                  
Basic earnings per share:                                  
Income available to common shareholders$866,978
 331,373
 $2.62
 $636,484
 337,740
 $1.88
 $539,362
 343,178
 $1.57
$630,059
 330,084
 $1.91
 $866,978
 331,373
 $2.62
 $636,484
 337,740
 $1.88
Effect of dilutive securities:                                  
Stock options and non-vested shares
 6,626
   
 5,913
   
 7,730
  
 3,488
   
 6,626
   
 5,913
  
Diluted earnings per share:                                  
Income available to common shareholders including assumed conversions$866,978
 337,999
 $2.57
 $636,484
 343,653
 $1.85
 $539,362
 350,908
 $1.54
$630,059
 333,572
 $1.89
 $866,978
 337,999
 $2.57
 $636,484
 343,653
 $1.85


Options to purchase 12.9 million, 10.6 million 9.4 million and 2.99.4 million shares of common stock at per share prices ranging from $50.04 to $73.40, $47.38$50.04 to $73.40 and $50.04$47.38 to $73.40, were outstanding at the end of 2018, 2017 2016 and 2015,2016, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.


(14) Share-Based Compensation and Equity
Stock Option and Equity Plans

As of the end of 20172018, we had five fixed stock option and equity plans in effect for associates and directors. This includes one plan from which we could issue grants, the Cerner Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Plan"); and four plans from which no new grants are permitted, but some awards remain outstanding (Plans D, E, F, and G).

Awards under the Omnibus Plan may consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, performance grants and bonus shares. At the end of 20172018, 11.87.4 million shares remain available for awards. Stock options granted under the Omnibus Plan are exercisable at a price not less than fair market value on the date of grant. Stock options under the Omnibus Plan typically vest over a period of five years and are exercisable for periods of up to 10 years.

Stock Options

The fair market value of each stock option award granted in 20172018 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton ("BSM") pricing model. The pricing model requires the use of the following estimates and assumptions:

Expected volatilities under the BSM model are based on an equal weighting of implied volatilities from traded options on our common shares and historical volatility.
The expected term of stock options granted is the period of time for which an option is expected to be outstanding beginning on the grant date. Our calculation of expected term takes into account the contractual term of the option, as well as the effects of employees' historical exercise patterns; groups of associates (executives and non-executives) that have similar historical behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes.
The risk-free rate is based on the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a term consistent with the expected term of the awards.

The weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair market value of stock options were as follows:
 For the Years Ended For the Years Ended
 2017 2016 2015 2018 2017 2016
            
Expected volatility (%) 26.7% 29.4% 27.6% 27.0% 26.7% 29.4%
Expected term (yrs) 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
Risk-free rate (%) 2.1% 1.5% 1.8% 2.8% 2.1% 1.5%

Stock option activity for 20172018 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise 
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic 
Value
 
Weighted-Average      
Remaining      
Contractual
 Term (Yrs)      
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise 
Price
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic 
Value
 
Weighted-Average      
Remaining      
Contractual
 Term (Yrs)      
Outstanding at beginning of year23,601
 $40.33
   21,332
 $49.40
   
Granted4,301
 63.33
   3,598
 58.35
   
Exercised(5,693) 21.08
   (2,660) 35.37
   
Forfeited and expired(877) 57.40
   (478) 62.46
   
Outstanding at end of year21,332
 49.40
 $386,339
 6.4521,792
 52.31
 $118,831
 6.28
            
Exercisable at end of year10,242
 $38.45
 $297,546
 4.5311,045
 $44.60
 $118,054
 4.48


For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands, except for grant date fair values)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Weighted-average grant date fair values$20.50
 $18.31
 $21.51
$20.13
 $20.50
 $18.31
          
Total intrinsic value of options exercised$252,277
 $177,375
 $196,127
$74,530
 $252,277
 $177,375
          
Cash received from exercise of stock options76,705
 63,794
 51,475
91,349
 76,705
 63,794
          
Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options85,657
 64,347
 66,868
17,233
 85,657
 64,347
As of the end of 20172018, there was $155$148 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under all plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.333.23 years.

Non-vested Shares and Share Units

Non-vested shares and share units are valued at fair market value on the date of grant and will vest provided the recipient has continuously served on the Board of Directors through such vesting date or, in the case of an associate, provided that service and/or performance measures are attained. The expense associated with these grants is recognized over the period from the date of grant to the vesting date.

Non-vested share and share unit activity for 20172018 was as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)Number of Shares 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Number of Shares 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
      
Outstanding at beginning of year354
 $61.12
799
 $66.76
Granted626
 66.97
537
 59.34
Vested(170) 56.40
(432) 65.77
Forfeited(11) 57.35
(22) 62.94
      
Outstanding at end of year799
 $66.76
882
 $62.82
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands, except for grant date fair values)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Weighted average grant date fair values for shares granted during the year$66.97
 $57.22
 $68.57
$59.34
 $66.97
 $57.22
          
Total fair value of shares vested during the year$11,050
 $12,221
 $13,730
$26,264
 $11,050
 $12,221
As of the end of 20172018, there was $32 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share and share unit awards granted under all plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.541.94 years.

Associate Stock Purchase Plan

We established an Associate Stock Purchase Plan ("ASPP") in 2001, which qualifies under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Each individual employed by us and associates of our U.S. based subsidiaries, except as provided below, are eligible to participate in the ASPP ("Participants"). The following individuals are excluded from participation: (a) persons who, as of the beginning of a purchase period under the Plan, have been continuously employed by us or our domestic subsidiaries for less than two weeks; (b) persons who, as of the beginning of a purchase period, own directly or indirectly, or hold options or rights to acquire under any agreement or Company plan, an aggregate of 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all outstanding shares of all classes of Company common stock; and, (c) persons who are customarily employed by us for less than 20 hours per week or for less than five months in any calendar year. Participants may elect to make contributions from 1% to 20% of compensation to the ASPP, subject to annual limitations determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Participants may purchase Company common stock at a 15% discount on the last business day of the option period. The purchase of Company common stock is made through the ASPP on the open market and subsequently reissued to Participants. The difference between the open market purchase and the Participant’sParticipant's purchase price is recognized as compensation expense, as such difference is paid by Cerner, in cash.

Share-Based Compensation Cost

Our stock option and non-vested share and share unit awards qualify for equity classification. The costs of our ASPP, along with participant contributions, are recorded as a liability until open market purchases are completed. The amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of operations with respect to stock options, non-vested shares and share units and ASPP are as follows:
For the Years EndedFor the Years Ended
(In thousands)2017 2016 20152018 2017 2016
          
Stock option and non-vested share and share unit compensation expense$83,019
 $74,536
 $70,121
$95,423
 $83,019
 $74,536
Associate stock purchase plan expense6,277
 6,537
 5,393
6,082
 6,277
 6,537
Amounts capitalized in software development costs, net of amortization(327) (482) (588)914
 (327) (482)
          
Amounts charged against earnings, before income tax benefit$88,969
 $80,591
 $74,926
$102,419
 $88,969
 $80,591
          
Amount of related income tax benefit recognized in earnings$25,265
 $24,749
 $23,435
$21,371
 $25,265
 $24,749
 
Preferred Stock

As of the end of 20172018 and 2016,2017, we had 1.0 million shares of authorized but unissued preferred stock, $0.01 par value.

Treasury Stock
In November 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program that allowed the Company to repurchase up to $500 million of shares of our common stock, excluding transaction costs. That program was completed in November 2017. In May 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to $500 million of shares of our common stock, excluding transaction costs. In May 2018, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the repurchase program that was authorized in May 2017. Under the amendment, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of shares of our common stock, for an aggregate of $1 billion, excluding transaction costs. The repurchases are to be effectuated in the open market, by block purchase, in privately negotiated transactions, or through other transactions managed by broker-dealers. No time limit was set for the completion of the current program. During 2017,2018, we repurchased 2.711.2 million shares for total consideration of $173$644 million under these programs.the program. The shares were recorded as treasury stock and accounted for under the cost method. No repurchased shares have been retired. At December 30, 2017, $42729, 2018, $283 million remains available for repurchase under the outstanding program.
During 20162017 and 2015,2016, we repurchased 13.72.7 million and 5.713.7 million shares of our common stock for total consideration of $173 million and $700 million, and $345 million, respectively, under share repurchase programs that are now complete.respectively. These shares were recorded as treasury stock and accounted for under the cost method. No repurchased shares have been retired.

(15) Foundations Retirement Plan

The Cerner Corporation Foundations Retirement Plan (the "Plan") was established under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All associates age 18 and older and who are not a member of an excluded class are eligible to participate. Participants may elect to make pre-tax and Roth (post-tax) contributions from 1% to 80% of eligible compensation to the Plan, subject to annual limitations determined by the Internal Revenue Service. Participants may direct contributions into mutual funds, a stable value fund, a Company stock fund, or a self-directed brokerage account. The Plan has a first tier discretionary match that is made on behalf of participants in an amount equal to 33% of the first 6% of the participant’sparticipant's salary contribution. The Plan's first tier discretionary match expenses amounted towere $31 million, $29 million and $28 million for 2018, 2017 and $30 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

The Plan also provides for a second tier matching contribution that is purely discretionary, the payment of which will depend on overall Company performance and other conditions. If approved by the Compensation Committee, contributions by the Company will be tied to attainment of established financial metric goals, such as earnings per share for the year. Participants who defer 2% of their paid base salary, are actively employed as of the last day of the Plan year and are employed before October 1st of the Plan year are eligible to receive the second tier discretionary match contribution, if any such second tier matching contribution is approved by the Compensation Committee. For the years ended 20162018 and 20152016 we expensed $10 million and $8 million, and $7 millionrespectively, for the second tier discretionary distributions, respectively.distributions.


(16) Commitments

Leases

We are committed under operating leases primarily for office and data center space and computer equipment through October 2027.December 2029. Rent expense for office and warehouse space for our regional and global offices for 2018, 2017 2016 and 20152016 was $31 million, $29$31 million and $32$29 million, respectively. Aggregate minimum future payments under these non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

(In thousands)Operating Lease ObligationsOperating Lease Obligations
  
2018$32,371
201928,605
$29,739
202024,012
27,669
202119,452
22,904
202212,914
17,240
2023 and thereafter6,463
202310,166
2024 and thereafter17,743
  
$123,817
$125,461

Other Obligations
We have purchase commitments with various vendors, and minimum funding commitments under collaboration agreements through 2037. Aggregate future payments under these commitments are as follows:
(In thousands)Purchase ObligationsPurchase Obligations
  
2018$76,861
201947,587
$138,851
202017,250
102,773
20215,490
24,746
20224,410
15,517
2023 and thereafter22,504
202315,486
2024 and thereafter26,924
  
$174,102
$324,297



(17) Segment Reporting

We have two operating segments, Domestic and Global. Revenues are derived primarily from the sale of clinical, financial and administrative information solutions and services. The cost of revenues includes the cost of third party consulting services, computer hardware, devices and sublicensed software purchased from manufacturers for delivery to clients. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to the manufacturers. Operating expenses incurred by the geographic business segments consist of sales and client service expenses including salaries of sales and client service personnel, expenses associated with our managed services business, marketing expenses, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. "Other" includes expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments, such as software development, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and related adjustments, share-based compensation expense, and certain amortization and depreciation. Performance of the segments is assessed at the operating earnings level by our chief operating decision maker, who is our Chief Executive Officer. Items such as interest, income taxes, capital expenditures and total assets are managed at the consolidated level and thus are not included in our operating segment disclosures. Accounting policies for each of the reportable segments are the same as those used on a consolidated basis.

The following table presents a summary of our operating segments and other expense for 20172018, 20162017 and 20152016:
 
(In thousands)Domestic Global     Other     Total    Domestic Global     Other     Total    
              
2017       
2018       
Revenues$4,575,171
 $567,101
 $
 $5,142,272
$4,730,266
 $636,059
 $
 $5,366,325
              
Cost of revenues755,729
 98,362
 
 854,091
Costs of revenue827,904
 109,444
 
 937,348
Operating expenses1,998,544
 264,196
 1,064,970
 3,327,710
2,164,465
 321,116
 1,168,611
 3,654,192
Total costs and expenses2,754,273
 362,558

1,064,970
 4,181,801
2,992,369
 430,560

1,168,611
 4,591,540
              
Operating earnings (loss)$1,820,898
 $204,543
 $(1,064,970) $960,471
$1,737,897
 $205,499
 $(1,168,611) $774,785
(In thousands)Domestic Global     Other     Total    Domestic Global     Other     Total    
              
2016       
2017       
Revenues$4,245,097
 $551,376
 $
 $4,796,473
$4,575,171
 $567,101
 $
 $5,142,272
              
Cost of revenues676,437
 102,679
 
 779,116
Costs of revenue755,729
 98,362
 
 854,091
Operating expenses1,774,146
 246,243
 1,085,955
 3,106,344
1,998,544
 264,196
 1,064,970
 3,327,710
Total costs and expenses2,450,583
 348,922
 1,085,955
 3,885,460
2,754,273
 362,558
 1,064,970
 4,181,801
              
Operating earnings (loss)$1,794,514
 $202,454
 $(1,085,955) $911,013
$1,820,898
 $204,543
 $(1,064,970) $960,471
(In thousands)Domestic Global     Other     Total    Domestic Global     Other     Total    
              
2015       
2016       
Revenues$3,904,454
 $520,813
 $
 $4,425,267
$4,245,097
 $551,376
 $
 $4,796,473
              
Cost of revenues651,826
 98,955
 
 750,781
Costs of revenue676,437
 102,679
 
 779,116
Operating expenses1,577,594
 233,047
 1,082,709
 2,893,350
1,774,146
 246,243
 1,085,955
 3,106,344
Total costs and expenses2,229,420
 332,002
 1,082,709
 3,644,131
2,450,583
 348,922
 1,085,955
 3,885,460
              
Operating earnings (loss)$1,675,034
 $188,811
 $(1,082,709) $781,136
$1,794,514
 $202,454
 $(1,085,955) $911,013

(18) Quarterly Results (unaudited)

Selected quarterly financial data for 20172018 and 20162017 is set forth below:
(In thousands, except per share data)Revenues Earnings Before Income Taxes Net Earnings Basic Earnings Per Share Diluted Earnings Per ShareRevenues Earnings Before Income Taxes Net Earnings Basic Earnings Per Share Diluted Earnings Per Share
                  
2017         
2018         
                  
First Quarter$1,260,486
 $243,010
 $173,213
 $0.52
 $0.52
$1,292,861
 $200,079
 $160,001
 $0.48
 $0.48
                  
Second Quarter1,291,994
 252,049
 179,683
 0.54
 0.53
1,367,727
 214,884
 169,357
 0.51
 0.51
                  
Third Quarter1,276,007
 250,415
 177,424
 0.53
 0.52
1,340,073
 214,099
 169,381
 0.51
 0.51
                  
Fourth Quarter (a)
1,313,785
 221,655
 336,658
 1.02
 1.00
1,365,664
 171,789
 131,320
 0.40
 0.40
                  
Total$5,142,272
 $967,129
 $866,978
    $5,366,325
 $800,851
 $630,059
    
                  
(a) Fourth quarter results include the impact of certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017 as further described in Note (12).
(a) Fourth quarter results include a pre-tax charge of $45 million to provide an allowance against certain client receivables with Fujitsu, as further discussed in Note (3).(a) Fourth quarter results include a pre-tax charge of $45 million to provide an allowance against certain client receivables with Fujitsu, as further discussed in Note (3).

(In thousands, except per share data)Revenues Earnings Before Income Taxes Net Earnings Basic Earnings Per Share Diluted Earnings Per ShareRevenues Earnings Before Income Taxes Net Earnings Basic Earnings Per Share Diluted Earnings Per Share
                  
2016         
2017         
                  
First Quarter$1,138,135
 $217,129
 $150,360
 $0.44
 $0.43
$1,260,486
 $243,010
 $173,213
 $0.52
 $0.52
                  
Second Quarter1,215,962
 243,782
 166,454
 0.49
 0.48
1,291,994
 252,049
 179,683
 0.54
 0.53
                  
Third Quarter1,184,557
 241,808
 169,979
 0.50
 0.49
1,276,007
 250,415
 177,424
 0.53
 0.52
                  
Fourth Quarter (b)
1,257,819
 215,715
 149,691
 0.45
 0.44
1,313,785
 221,655
 336,658
 1.02
 1.00
                  
Total$4,796,473
 $918,434
 $636,484
    $5,142,272
 $967,129
 $866,978
    
                  
(b) Fourth quarter results include pre-tax costs related to the 2016 VSP of $36 million as further described in Note (1).
(b) Fourth quarter results include the impact of certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017 as further described in Note (12).(b) Fourth quarter results include the impact of certain U.S. income tax reform enacted in December 2017 as further described in Note (12).


8278