=====================================================================1
===============================================================================
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------------
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 19951996
Commission file number 1-9447
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DelawareDELAWARE 94-3030279
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5847 SAN FELIPE, SUITE 2600, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77057-3010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 267-3777
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
------------------- ---------------------------------------
Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
8.255%8.25% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred Stock, New York Stock Exchange
$.05 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- No
-------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. ---___
As of March 15, 1996,14, 1997, there were 71,641,85471,651,349 shares of the common stockCommon Stock of the
registrant outstanding. Based upon New York Stock Exchange closing prices on
March 15, 1996,14, 1997, the aggregate market value of the registrant's common stockCommon Stock and
8.255% PRIDES held by non-affiliates was $421.1$368.8 million.
Certain portionsportion of the registrant's annual report to shareholders for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995,1996, are incorporated by reference into Parts I,
II, and IV of this Report on Form 10-K. Certain portions of the registrant's
definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the close
of the registrant's fiscal year are incorporated by reference into Part III of
this Report on Form 10-K.
======================================================================================================================================================
2
NOTE
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission includes all exhibits required to be filed with the Report.
Copies of this Report on Form 10-K, including only Exhibit 21 of the exhibits
listed on pages 25-2823-26 of this Report, are available without charge upon written
request. The registrant will furnish copies of the other exhibits to this
Report on Form 10-K upon payment of a fee of 25 cents per page. Please contact
the office set forth below to request copies of this Report on Form 10-K and
for information as to the number of pages contained in each of the other
exhibits and to request copies of such exhibits:
Corporate Secretary
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
5847 San Felipe, Suite 2600
Houston, Texas 77057-3010
(i)
3
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. . . . . . . . . . 16
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. . . . . . . 17
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . 17
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. . . . . . . 17
PART III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ITEM 10.. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 17
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. . 17
PART IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
SCHEDULE I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
INDEX OF EXHIBITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Page
----
PART I.......................................................................... 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS...................................................... 1
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.................................................... 11
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS............................................. 12
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS........... 15
PART II......................................................................... 15
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS................................ 15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA....................................... 15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS....................... 15
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA................... 15
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE........................ 15
PART III........................................................................ 15
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT............ 15
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION........................................ 15
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT.............................................. 15
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS................ 15
PART IV......................................................................... 16
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND
REPORTS ON FORM 8-K......................................... 16
SCHEDULE I .............................................................. 17
SIGNATURES .............................................................. 22
INDEX OF EXHIBITS............................................................... 23
EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES.................................................. 27
(ii)
4
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements which constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements appear in a number of places in
this Report (see, for example, Item 1. "Business - Industry OverviewOverview;"
"Business - The Company - Profit Enhancement and Cost Reduction Initiative,"
"Production Operations," "-Competition," "-Research and Development,"
"-Business Development," and "Environmental Matters," and Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings"). Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "estimates," "will,"
"should," "plans" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations
thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are
cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual
results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors. These factors include the effectiveness of
management's strategies and decisions, general economic and business
conditions, developments in technology, new or modified statutory or regulatory
requirements and changing prices and market conditions. This Report and the
financial portion of the Company's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders (see
Items 6 through 8 of this Report) identify other factors that could cause such
differences. No assurance can be given that these are all of the factors that
could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking
statements.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Primary aluminum is produced by the refining of bauxite into alumina and the
reduction of alumina into primary aluminum. Approximately two pounds of bauxite
are required to produce one pound of alumina, and approximately two pounds of
alumina are required to produce one pound of primary aluminum. Aluminum's
valuable physical properties include its light weight, corrosion resistance,
thermal and electrical conductivity, and high tensile strength.
Demand
The packaging, transportation and construction industries are the principal
consumers of aluminum in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, and
Western Europe.the United Kingdom. In the packaging industry, which accounted for approximately 20%an estimated
21% of aluminum consumption in 1994,1996 in the previously referenced countries,
aluminum's recyclability and weight advantages have enabled it to gain market
share from steel and glass, primarily in the beverage container area. Nearly
all beer cans and soft drink cans manufactured for the United States market are
made of aluminum. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation ("Kaiser"KAC" or the "Company") believes
that growth in the packaging area is likely to continue through the 1990s due
to general population increase and to further penetration of the beverage
container market in Asia and Latin America, where aluminum cans are a substantially
lower percentage of the total beverage container market than in the United
States. Kaiseremerging markets. The Company believes that growth in
demand for can sheet in the United States will follow the growth in population,
offset, in part, by the effects of the use of lighter gauge aluminum for can
sheet and ofby plastic container production from newly installed capacity.production.
In the transportation industry, which accounted for approximately 28%an estimated 30% of
aluminum consumption in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and
Western Europethe United Kingdom in 1994,1996, automotive manufacturers use aluminum instead of
steel, ductile iron, or copper for an increasing number of components,
including radiators, wheels, suspension components, and engines, in order to
meet more stringent environmental, safety, and fuel efficiency requirements. Kaiserstandards. The
Company believes that sales of aluminum to the transportation industry have
considerable growth potential due to projected increases in the use of aluminum
in automobiles. In addition, Kaiserthe Company believes that consumption of aluminum
in the construction industry will follow the cyclical growth pattern of that
industry, and will benefit from higher growth in Asian and Latin American
economies.
Supply
As of year-end 1995, Western1996, estimated world aluminum capacity from 107179 smelting
facilities was approximately 16.622.9 million tons* per year. Western worldWorld production of
primary aluminum for 19951996 increased approximately 1.8%4.5% compared to 1994.1995. Net
exports of aluminum from the former Sino Soviet bloc increased approximately
250%200% from 1990 levels during the period from 1991
through 1994 to approximately 2.2an estimated 1.9 million tons per year.year as
- -----------
* All references to tons in this Report refer to metric tons of 2,204.6 pounds.
1
5
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
of year-end 1996. In addition, one smelter continued to increase production
following its start-up in 1995, and a number of producers restarted idled
capacity in late 1995 and early 1996. These exports, as well as new and
restared capacity, contributed to a significantan increase in London Metal Exchange ("LME")
stocks of primary aluminum which peaked in June 1994October 1996 at 2.7 million970,000 tons. ByAt the
end of 1995,1996, LME stocks of primary aluminum had declined 2.1 million18,725 tons from this
peak level and 1.1 million tons from the beginning of 1995.to 951,275 tons. See "-Recent Industry"Industry Trends."
Based upon information currently available, the Company believes that moderate
additions will be made during 1996-19981997-1999 to Western world alumina and primary aluminum
production capacity. The increases in alumina capacity during 1996-19981997-1999 are
expected to come from one new refinery, which began operations in 19951996, and
incremental expansions of existing - ----------
* All references to tons in this Report refer to metric tons of
2,204.6 pounds.
1
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
refineries. In addition, Kaiserthe Company
believes that there is currently approximately .9an estimated 1.6 million tons of curtailedunutilized
world smelting capacity that could be
restarted by aluminum producers.capacity. The increases in world primary aluminum capacity
during 1996-19981997-1999 are expected to come from onetwo new smelter,smelters which beganmay begin
operations in 1995 and is1997, two relocated smelters that are expected to reach its rated capacity of
approximately 466,000 tons per yearresume
operations in 1996,1998, and the remainder principally from incremental expansions
of existing smelters.
Recent Industry Trends
Market fundamentalsPrimary aluminum prices have historically been subject to significant cyclical
price fluctuations. During the first half of 1996, the average Midwest United
States transaction price ("AMT Price") for aluminum improved significantly in 1994 as aluminum
producers worldwide curtailed primary aluminum production,remained relatively
stable in the $.75 per pound range. However, during the second half of the year
the AMT Price fell, reaching a low of $.65 per pound for October 1996, before
recovering late in the year. During 1996, the AMT Price for primary aluminum
was approximately $.72 per pound, compared to $.86, $.72 and $.54 per pound in
1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. The AMT Price for primary aluminum for the
week ended March 14, 1997, was approximately $.81 per pound.
The significant improvement in prices during 1994 and 1995 resulted from strong
growth in Western world consumption of aluminum grew strongly, and customers replenished
inventories, particularlythe curtailment of
production in the United States.response to lower prices in prior periods by many producers
worldwide. In 1995, production of primary aluminum increased and consumption of
aluminum continued to grow, but at a much lower rate than in 1994. In general,
the overall aluminum market was strongest in the first half of 1995. By the
second half of 1995, orders and shipments for certain products had softened and
the rate of decline in LME inventories had leveled off. By the end of 1995,
some small increases in LME inventories occurred, and prices of aluminum
weakened from first-half levels. The Midwest U.S. transaction price forThis trend continued throughout most of 1996.
Net reported primary aluminum inventories increased by approximately 62,000
tons in 1996 based upon reports of the LME and the International Primary
Aluminium Institute ("IPAI"), following substantial declines of 764,000 and
1,153,000 tons in 1994 and 1995, respectively. However, since year-end 1996,
LME stocks of primary aluminum have continued to decline from their October
1996 peak level.
Increased production of primary aluminum due to restarts of certain previously
idled capacity, the continued increase in production of a smelter in South
Africa following its start-up in 1995, averaged approximately 86 cents per pound,
comparedand the continued high level of exports
from the Commonwealth of Independent States ("CIS") contributed to a 1994 annual averageincreased
supplies of approximately 72 cents per pound. The
Midwest U.S. transaction price for primary aluminum averaged approximately
79 cents per poundto the Western world in December 1995.1996. While the economies
of the major aluminum consuming regions - the United States, Japan, Western
Europe, and Asia - are, in the aggregate, performing relatively well, the
Company believes that the reduction of aluminum inventories by customers, as
prices have continued to decline, has mitigated the growth in primary aluminum
demand that normally accompanies growth in economic and industrial activity.
Western world demand for alumina, and the price of alumina, declined in 1994 in
response to the curtailment of Western world smelter production of primary
aluminum, partially offset by increased usage of Western world alumina by
smelters in the Commonwealth of Independent States (the "CIS")CIS and in the People's Republic of China (the "PRC"("PRC"). Increased
Western world production of primary aluminum, as well as continued imports of
Western world alumina by the CIS and the PRC, during 1995 resulted in higher
demand for Western world alumina and significantly stronger alumina pricing. In
1996, however, the alumina market softened, primarily as a result of increased
alumina production and decreased alumina exports to the CIS and the PRC,
resulting in lower alumina prices. However, increases in primary aluminum
production as well as reductions in alumina production during the second half
of 1996 resulted in stronger alumina pricing in late 1996.
United States shipments of domestic fabricated aluminum products in 1995 were
approximately at 1994 levels, although in 1995 demand for can sheet in the
United States softened relative to 1994. Overall, Kaiser believes thatUnited States shipments of domestic
fabricated aluminum
2
6
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
products in 1996 are estimated to be approximately at 1995 levels, although in
1996 demand for can sheet in the market fundamentals for aluminum will be good for the near future,
barring prolonged economic recession, and that demand is likelyUnited States softened relative to continue
growing at levels sufficient to absorb the output from restarts of industry
smelter capacity and from the limited additions of new supply under
construction.
The Company1995.
THE COMPANY
General
The Company is a direct subsidiary of MAXXAM Inc. ("MAXXAM"). The Company, through its
subsidiary, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation ("KACC"), operates in all
principal aspects of the aluminum industry - the mining of bauxite, the
refining of bauxite into alumina, the production of primary aluminum from
alumina, and the manufacture of fabricated (including semi-fabricated)semi- fabricated)
aluminum products. In addition to the production utilized by KACC in its
operations, KACC sells significant amounts of alumina and primary aluminum in
domestic and international markets. In 1995,1996, KACC produced approximately
2,838,000 tons of alumina, of which approximately 72%73% was sold to third
parties, and produced 413,600approximately 473,200 tons of primary aluminum, of which
approximately 66%75% was sold to third parties. KACC is also a major domestic
supplier of fabricated aluminum products. In 1995,1996, KACC shipped approximately
368,200327,100 tons of fabricated aluminum products to third parties, which accounted
for approximately 6%5% of the total tonnage of United States domestic shipments.
A majority of KACC's fabricated products are sold to distributors or used by
customers as components in the manufacture and assembly of finished end-use
products. Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in the Company's 19951996 Annual Report to Shareholders (the "Annual Report") is
incorporated herein by reference.
2
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
The following table sets forth total shipments and intracompany transfers of
KACC's alumina, primary aluminum, and fabricated aluminum operations:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- -------
(in thousands of tons)
ALUMINA:
ALUMINA:
Shipments to Third Parties 2,073.7 2,040.1 2,086.7
1,997.5
Intracompany Transfers 912.4 800.6 820.9 807.5
PRIMARY ALUMINUM:
Shipments to Third Parties 355.6 271.7 224.0
242.5
Intracompany Transfers 128.3 217.4 225.1 233.6
FABRICATED ALUMINUM PRODUCTS:
Shipments to Third Parties 327.1 368.2 399.0 373.2
Sensitivity to Prices and Hedging Programs
Kaiser'sThe Company's operating results are sensitive to changes in the prices of
alumina, primary aluminum, and fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to
a significant degree upon the volume and mix of all products sold and on KACC's
hedging strategies. FabricatedPrimary aluminum prices whichhave historically been subject to
significant cyclical price fluctuations. Alumina prices, as well as fabricated
aluminum product prices (which vary considerably among products,products), are
significantly influenced by changes in the price of primary aluminum and
generally lag behind primary aluminum prices for periods of up to sixthree months.
ChangesFrom time to time in the marketordinary course of business KACC enters into hedging
transactions to provide price risk management in respect of primary
aluminum also affect Kaiser's production costs of fabricated products
because they influence the price of aluminum scrap purchased by Kaiser and
Kaiser's labor costs, to the extent such costs are indexed to primary
aluminum prices. Through its variable cost structures, forwardnet
3
7
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
exposure resulting from (i) anticipated sales and
hedging programs, KACC has attempted to mitigate its exposure to possible
declines in the market prices of alumina, primary aluminum, and
fabricated aluminum products, while retainingless (ii) expected purchases of certain items,
such as aluminum scrap, rolling ingot, and bauxite, whose prices fluctuate with
the abilityprice of primary aluminum. Forward sales contracts are used by KACC to
participate in favorable
pricing environmentseffectively lock-in or fix the price that may materialize.KACC will receive for its shipments.
KACC also uses option contracts (i) to establish a minimum price for its
product shipments, (ii) to establish a "collar" or range of price for its
anticipated sales, and/or (iii) to permit KACC to realize possible upside price
movements. See "Management's DiscussionNotes 1 and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Trends -
Sensitivity to Prices and Hedging Programs" and Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
in the Annual Report.
Profit Enhancement and Cost Reduction Initiative
In October 1996, KACC established a goal of achieving significant cost
reduction and profit improvements by the end of 1997, with the full effect
planned to be realized in 1998 and beyond, measured against 1996 results. To
achieve this goal KACC plans reductions in production costs, decreases in
corporate general and administrative expenses, and enhancements to product mix
and volume throughput. There can be no assurance that the initiative will
result in the desired cost reductions and other profit improvements.
Production Operations
The Company's operations are conducted through KACC's decentralized business
units which compete throughout the aluminum industry.
o The alumina business unit, which mines bauxite and obtains
additional bauxite tonnage under long-term contracts, produced
approximately 8%7% of Western worldtotal produced alumina in 1995.1996 as reported by
the IPAI. During 1995, KACC1996, KACC's third party shipments of bauxite
represented approximately 21%25% of bauxite mined. In addition,
KACCKACC's third party shipments of alumina represented approximately
72%73% of alumina produced. KACC's share of total Western world alumina
capacity as reported by the IPAI was approximately 7%6% in 1995.1996.
o The primary aluminum products business unit operates two
wholly-owned domestic smelters wholly owned by KACC and two foreign smelters in which
KACC holds significant ownership interests. During 1995, KACC1996, KACC's
third party shipments of primary aluminum represented
approximately 66%75% of its primary aluminum production. KACC's
share of total Western world primary aluminum capacity as reported by the
IPAI was approximately 3%2% in 1995.
3
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)1996.
o Fabricated aluminum products are manufactured by threetwo business
units - flat-rolled products extruded products and engineered components.products. The
products include heat-treated products, body, lid, and tab stock
for beverage containers, sheet and plate products,
heat-treated products, screw machine
stock, redraw rod, forging stock, truck wheels and hubs, air bag
canisters, engine manifolds, and other castings, forgings and
extruded products, which are manufactured at plants located in
principal marketing areas of the United States and Canada. The
aluminum utilized in KACC's fabricated products operations is
comprised of primary aluminum, obtained both internally and from
third parties, and scrap metal purchased from third parties.
Alumina4
8
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
Alumina
The following table lists KACC's bauxite mining and alumina refining facilities
as of December 31, 1995:1996:
Annual
Production Total
Capacity Annual
Company Available to Production
Activity Facility Location Ownership the Company Capacity
- -------- -------- -------- --------- ----------- ------------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------------- ----------------
(tons) (tons)
Bauxite Mining KJBC(1) Jamaica 49% 4,500,000 4,500,000
Alpart(2) Jamaica 65% 2,275,000 3,500,000
--------- --------------------- -------------
6,775,000 8,000,000
========= ===================== =============
Alumina Refining Gramercy Louisiana 100% 1,000,000 1,000,0001,050,000 1,050,000
Alpart Jamaica 65% 943,000942,500 1,450,000
QAL Australia 28.3% 934,000 3,300,000
------- ---------
2,877,000 5,750,000
========= =========973,500 3,440,000
------------ -------------
2,966,000 5,940,000
============ =============
- ------------
(1) Although KACC owns 49% of Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company ("KJBC"), it has
the right to receive all of such entity's output.
(2) Alumina Partners of Jamaica ("Alpart") bauxite is refined into alumina at
the Alpart refinery.
Bauxite mined in Jamaica by KJBC is refined into alumina at KACC's plant at
Gramercy, Louisiana, or is sold to third parties. In 1979, the Government of
Jamaica granted KACC a mining lease for the mining of bauxite sufficient to
supply KACC's then-existing Louisiana alumina refineries at their annual
capacities of 1,656,000 tons per year until January 31, 2020. Alumina from the
Gramercy plant is sold to third parties.
Alpart holds bauxite reserves and owns a 1,450,000 tons per year alumina plant
located in Jamaica. KACC owns a 65% interest in Alpart, and Hydro AluminiumAluminum a.s
("Hydro") owns the remaining 35% interest. KACC has management responsibility
for the facility on a fee basis. KACC and Hydro have agreed to be responsible
for their proportionate shares of Alpart's costs and expenses. The Government
of Jamaica has granted Alpart a mining lease and has entered into other
agreements with Alpart designed to assure that sufficient reserves of bauxite
will be available to Alpart to operate its refinery as it may be expanded to a
capacity of 2,000,000 tons per year through the year 2024. Alpart has entered into an agreement for the supply
of substantially all of its fuel oil through 1996. The balance of Alpart's
fuel oil requirements through 1996 will be purchased in the spot market.
4
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
KACC owns a 28.3% interest in Queensland Alumina Limited ("QAL"), which owns
the largest and one of the most efficient alumina refineries in the world,
located in Queensland, Australia. QAL refines bauxite into alumina, essentially
on a cost basis, for the account of its stockholders under long-term tolling
contracts. The stockholders, including KACC, purchase bauxite from another QAL
stockholder under long-term supply contracts. KACC has contracted with QAL to
take approximately 792,000 tons per year of capacity or pay standby charges.
KACC is unconditionally obligated to pay amounts calculated to service its
share ($88.994.4 million at December 31, 1995)1996) of certain debt of QAL, as well as
other QAL costs and expenses, including bauxite shipping costs.
QAL's annual production capacity is
approximately 3,300,000 tons, of which approximately 934,000 tons are
available to KACC.
KACC's principal customers for bauxite and alumina consist of large and
small domestic and internationalother aluminum
producers that purchase bauxite and reduction-grade alumina, for use in their internal refining and smelting
operations, trading
intermediaries who resell raw materials to end-users, and users of
chemical-grade alumina. In 1995, KACC sold allAll of itsKACC's third-party sales of bauxite in 1996 were
made to two customers, the largest of which accounted for approximately 74%79% of
such sales. KACC also sold alumina to nine15 customers, the largest and top five of
which accounted for approximately 23%21% and 90%79% of such sales, respectively. See
"- Competition."-Competition." The Company believes that among alumina producers KACC is now the
world's second largest seller of alumina to third parties. KACC's strategy is
to sell a substantial portion of the bauxite and alumina available to it in
excess of its internal refining and smelting requirements under multi-year
sales contracts. See also "-Sensitivity to Prices and Hedging Programs."
5
9
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
Primary Aluminum Products
- -------------------------
The following table lists KACC's primary aluminum smelting facilities as of
December 31, 1995:1996:
Annual Rated Total 19951996
Capacity Annual Average
Company Available to Rated Operating
Location Facility Ownership the Company Capacity Rate
- -------- -------- ------------------------------- ---------- ------------- ---------------- ----------- -------- ---------------
(tons) (tons)
Domestic
Washington Mead 100% 200,000 200,000 82%106%
Washington Tacoma 100% 73,000 73,000 82%
------ ------100%
----------- ----------
Subtotal 273,000 273,000
------- ------------------ ----------
International
Ghana Valco 90% 180,000 200,000 68%
Wales, United Kingdom Anglesey 49% 55,000 112,000 119%
------ -------118%
----------- ----------
Subtotal 235,000 312,000
------- ------------------ ----------
Total 508,000 585,000
======= ================== ==========
KACC owns two smelters located at Mead and Tacoma, Washington, where alumina is
processed into primary aluminum. The Mead facility uses pre-bake technology and
produces primary aluminum. Approximately 71%53% of Mead's 19951996 production was used
at KACC's Trentwood fabricating facility and the balance was sold to third
parties. The Tacoma plantfacility uses Soderberg technology and produces primary
aluminum and high-grade, continuous-cast, redraw rod, which currently commands
a premium price in excess of the price of primary aluminum. Both smelters have
achieved significant production efficiencies in recent years through retrofit technology and a
variety of cost controls,
and semi-variable wage and power contracts, leading to increases in production volume and
enhancing their ability to compete with newer smelters. AtKACC has also commenced
the modernization and expansion of the carbon baking furnace at its Mead
plant, KACC
5
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
has convertedsmelter at an estimated cost of approximately $52.0 million. The project is
expected to welded anode assemblieslower costs, enhance safety, and improve the environmental
performance of the facility, and is expected to increase energy efficiency,
extended the anode life-cyclebe completed in the smelting process,
changed from pencil to liquid pitch to produce carbon anodes which achieved
environmental and operating savings, and engaged in efforts to increase
production through the use of improved, higher-efficiency reduction cells.late 1998.
Electric power represents an important production cost for KACC at its aluminum
smelters. In 1995, KACC successfully restructured electric power purchase
agreements for KACC'sits facilities in the Pacific Northwest, were successfully restructured, which the Company anticipates will resultresulted in
significantly lower electric power costs in 1996 and beyond for the Mead and Tacoma,
Washington, smelters and
the Trentwood, Washington, rolling mill compared to 1995 electric power costs. From 1981 until 1995,KACC expects to
continue to benefit from these savings in electric power for KACC's Meadcosts at these
facilities in 1997 and Tacoma
smelters was purchased exclusively frombeyond. However, a number of lawsuits challenging the
Bonneville Power Administration
(the "BPA") by KACC under a contract which expires in 2001. In April 1995
the BPA agreed to allow each of its direct service industrial customers
(the "DSIs"), which include KACC, to purchase a portion of its requirement
for electric power from sources other than the BPA beginning October 1,
1995. In June 1995 KACC entered into an agreement with The Washington
Water Power Company (the "WWP") to purchase up to 50 megawatts of electric
power for its Northwest facilities for a five-year term beginning October
1, 1995. KACC is receiving power under that contract, which power
displaces a portion of KACC's interruptible power from the BPA. In
addition, in 1995 KACC entered into a new power purchase contract with the
BPA, which amends the existing BPA power contract and which contemplates
reductions during 1996 in the amount of power which KACC is obligated to
purchase from the BPA and which the BPA is obligated to sell to KACC,restructuring have been filed and the replacement of such power with power to be purchased from other
suppliers. KACC is negotiating power purchase agreements for such power
with suppliers other than the BPA. Contracts for the purchase of all power
required by KACC's Mead and Tacoma smelters and Trentwood rolling mill for
1996, and for approximately one-half of such power for the period 1997-2000,
have been finalized. Two lawsuits were filed in December 1995
against the BPA by various parties, one of which petitions for a review of
the BPA's "Record of Decision on Direct Service Industrial Customer
Requirements Power Sales Contract" issued on September 28, 1995, and one of
which petitions for review of, and to set aside, suspend, or modify, the
action of the BPA to decide to offer five-year "block" power sales to the
DSIs. The effect, if any, of such lawsuits if any, on
KACC's new power purchase contract with the BPAand transmission arrangements is not known. Certain of the DSIs, including KACC,
have intervened in the two lawsuits.
In 1995 KACC also entered into agreements with the BPA and with the WWP,
with terms ending in 2001, under which the BPA and the WWP would provide to
KACC transmission services for power purchased from sources other than the
BPA. The term of the transmission services agreement with the BPA was
subsequently extended for an additional fifteen years, which extension has
been challenged. Four lawsuits have been filed against the BPA by various
parties, which lawsuits either challenge the BPA's record of decision
offering such an extension agreement to the DSIs or challenge the BPA's
Business Plan Environmental Impact Statement record of decision in
connection therewith. Certain of the DSIs, including KACC, have intervened
in the four lawsuits.
KACC began operating its Mead and Tacoma smelters in Washingtonknown at approximately 75% of their full capacity in January 1993, when three
reduction potlines were removed from production (two at Mead and one at
Tacoma) in response to a power reduction imposed by the BPA. In March
1995, the BPA offered to its industrial customers, including KACC, surplus
firm power at a discounted rate for the period April 1, 1995, through July
31, 1995, to enable such customers to restart idle industrial loads. In
April 1995, KACC and the BPA entered into a contract for an amount of such
power, and thereafter KACC restarted one-half of an idle potline
(approximately 9,000 tons of annual capacity) at its Tacoma, Washington,
smelter. The Tacoma smelter was returned to full production in October
1995. In 1995 KACC entered into a one-year power supply contract with the
BPA, for a term ending September 30, 1996, in connection with the restart
of idled capacity at its Mead smelter. The Mead smelter returned to full
production in December 1995.this time.
KACC manages, and owns a 90% interest in, the Volta Aluminium Company Limited
("Valco") aluminum smelter in Ghana. The Valco smelter uses pre-bake technology
and processes alumina supplied by KACC and the other participant into primary
aluminum under long-term tolling contracts which provide for proportionate
payments by the participants
6
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
in amounts intended to pay not less than all of Valco's operating and
financing costs.participants. KACC's share of the primary aluminum is sold to
third parties. Power for the Valco smelter is supplied under an agreement which
expires in 2017. The agreement indexes two-thirds of the price of the contract
quantity of power to the market price of primary aluminum. The agreement also
provides for a review and adjustment of the base power rate and the price index
every five years. The most recent review was completed in April 1994 for the
1994-1998 period. ValcoThe Volta River Authority has entered into an
agreement with the government of Ghana under whichallocated to Valco has been assured
(except in cases of force majeure) that it will receive sufficient
electric power to operate at 80% of its current level of three and one-half potlinesannual rated capacity through December
31, 1996. Kaiser believes that, assuming normal rainfall
during 1996, Valco should have available sufficient electric power to
operate at its current level through 1996.1997.
KACC owns a 49% interest in the Anglesey Aluminium Limited ("Anglesey")
aluminum smelter and port facility at Holyhead, Wales. The Anglesey smelter
uses pre-bake technology. KACC supplies 49% of Anglesey's alumina requirements
and purchases 49% of Anglesey's aluminum output. KACC sells its share of
Anglesey's output to third parties. Power for the Anglesey aluminum smelter is
supplied under an agreement which expires in 2001.
KACC has developed and installed proprietary retrofit and control technology in
all of its smelters, as well as at third party locations. This technology -
which includes the redesign of the cathodes and anodes that conduct electricity
through reduction cells, improved feed systems that add alumina to the cells,
and a computerized system that controls energy flow in the cells - has
6
10
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
significantly contributed to increased and more efficient production of primary
aluminum and enhances KACC's ability to compete more effectively with the
industry's newer smelters. KACC is actively engaged in efforts to license this
technology and sell technical and managerial assistance to other producers
worldwide, and may participate in joint ventures or similar business
partnerships which employ KACC's technical and managerial knowledge. See
"-Research and Development."
KACC's principal primary aluminum customers consist of large trading
intermediaries and metal brokers, who resell primary aluminum to fabricated
product manufacturers, and large and small international aluminum fabricators.
In 1995,1996, KACC sold its primary aluminum production not utilized for internal
purposes to approximately 3545 customers, the largest and top five of which
accounted for approximately 25%16% and 62%54% of such sales, respectively. See "-
Competition." Marketing and sales efforts are conducted by a small staff
located at the business unit's headquarters in Pleasanton, California, and by
senior executives of KACC who participate in the structuring of major sales
transactions. A majority of the business unit's sales are based upon long-term
relationships with metal merchants and end-users.
Fabricated Aluminum Products
- ----------------------------
KACC manufactures and markets fabricated aluminum products for the
transportation, packaging, transportation, construction, and consumer durables markets in the
United States and abroad. Sales in these markets are made directly and through
distributors to a large number of customers. In 1995, four
domestic beverage container manufacturers were among the leading customers
for KACC's fabricated products and accounted for approximately 12% of
KACC's sales revenue. KACC's fabricated products compete
with those of numerous domestic and foreign producers and with products made of
steel, copper, glass, plastic, and other materials. Product quality, price, and
availability are the principal competitive factors in the market for fabricated
aluminum products. KACC has focused its fabricated products operations on
selected products in which KACC has production expertise, high-quality
capability, and geographic and other competitive advantages.
Flat-Rolled Products - The flat-rolled products business unit, the largest of
KACC's fabricated products businesses, operates the Trentwood sheet and plate
mill at Spokane, Washington. In addition, KACC broke ground on its first
commercial Micromill(TM) facility, near Reno, Nevada. The Micromill(TM) process
is a proprietary, compact, high-speed process for continuous casting and
rolling of a thin-strip aluminum sheet from molten metal. KACC expects the
Nevada facility to be in a start-up mode in the first half of 1997, and
anticipates beginning limited customer shipments from the facility by the
second half of 1997. See "-Research and Development."
The Trentwood facility is KACC's largest fabricating plant and accounted for
approximately 64%63% of KACC's 19951996 fabricated aluminum products shipments. The
business unit supplies the aerospace and general engineering markets (producing
heat-treat products), the beverage container market (producing body, lid, and
tab stock), the
aerospace market, and the tooling plate, heat-treated alloyspecialty coil markets (producing automotive brazing sheet,
wheel, and common
alloy coil markets,tread products), both directly and through distributors.
During 1995,
KACC successfully
7
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
completedcontinues to implement changes to the two year restructuringprocess and product mix of its
flat-rolledTrentwood rolling mill in an effort to maximize its profitability and maintain
full utilization of the facility. KACC has approved an expansion of its
heat-treat capacity to approximately 60,000 tons from approximately 45,000 tons,
which will enable KACC to increase the range of its heat-treat products,
operation
atincluding wide heat-treated sheet for the aerospace market, enhance the quality
of its Trentwood plantheat-treated products, and improve Trentwood's operating efficiency. The
project is estimated to reduce that facility's annual operating costs by
at least $50.0 million.cost approximately $45.0 million and to take
approximately two years to complete. Global sales of KACC's heat-treat products
have increased significantly over the last several years and are made primarily
to the aerospace and general engineering markets, which are experiencing growth
in demand.
KACC's flat-rolled products are also sold primarily to beverage container manufacturers
located in the western United States and in the Asian Pacific Rim countries
where the Trentwood plant's location provides KACC with a transportation
advantage. Quality of products for the beverage container industry, service,
and timeliness of delivery are the primary bases on which KACC competes. KaiserKACC
has made significant capital expenditures at Trentwood during the past several
years in rolling technology and process control to improve the metal integrity,
shape and gauge control of its products. The Company believes that capitalsuch
improvements at Trentwood have enhanced the quality of KACC's products for the beverage
container industry and the capacity and efficiency of KACC's manufacturing
operations, and that KACC is one of the highest quality producers of aluminum
beverage can stock in the world.
In 1995, the flat-rolled products business unit had 31 domestic and foreign
can stock customers, including the five major domestic beverage can
manufacturers. The largest and top five of such customers accounted for
approximately 14% and 41%, respectively, of the business unit's revenue.
See "- Competition." In 1995,1996, the business unit shipped products to approximately 150 customers in
the aerospace, transportation, and industrial ("ATI") markets, most of which
were distributors who sell to a variety of industrial end-users. The top five
customers in the ATI
7
11
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
markets for flat-rolled products accounted for approximately 13%15% of the business
unit's revenue. In 1996, the flat-rolled products business unit had 42 domestic
and foreign can stock customers. The largest and top five of such customers
accounted for approximately 18% and 35%, respectively, of the business unit's
revenue. See "-Competition." The marketing staff for the flat-rolled products
business unit is located at the Trentwood facility and in Pleasanton,
California. Sales are made directly to end-use customers (including distributors)and distributors from
eight sales offices located throughout the United States. International
customers are served by sales offices in the NetherlandsEngland and Japan and by independent
sales agents in Asia and Latin America.
ExtrudedEngineered Products - The extrudedengineered products business unit is headquartered in
Dallas, Texas,Detroit, Michigan, and operates soft-alloy extrusion facilities in Los Angeles,
California; Santa Fe Springs, California; Sherman, Texas; and London, Ontario,
Canada; a cathodic protection business located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, that also
extrudes both aluminum and magnesium; rod and bar facilities in Newark, Ohio,
and Jackson, Tennessee, which produce screw machine stock, redraw rod, forging
stock, and billet; and a facility in Richland, Washington, which produces
seamless tubing in both hard and soft alloys for the automotive, other
transportation, export, recreation, agriculture, and other industrial markets.
Each of the soft-alloy extrusion facilities has fabricating capabilities and
provides finishing services. TheMajor markets for extruded products business unit's major markets are in the
transportation industry, to which itthe business unit provides extruded shapes
for automobiles, trucks, trailers, cabs, and shipping containers, and in the
distribution, durable goods, defense, building and construction, ordnance and
electrical markets. In 1995,The sales and engineering office in Detroit, Michigan,
works with car makers and other customers, the extrudedCenter for Technology (see "-
Research and Development"), and plant personnel to create new automotive
component designs and improve existing products.
The engineered products business unit had
approximately 825 customers for its products, the largest and top five of
which accounted for approximately 6% and 20%, respectively, of its revenue.
See "- Competition." Sales are made directly from plants as well as
marketing locations across the United States.
Engineered Components - The engineered components business unitalso operates forging facilities at Erie,
Pennsylvania; Oxnard, California; and Greenwood, South Carolina; a machine shop
at Greenwood, South Carolina; and a casting facility in Canton, Ohio. The engineered components business
unitOhio, and is
one of the largest producers of aluminum forgings in the United States and is a
major supplier of high-quality forged parts to customers in the automotive,
commercial vehicle and ordnance markets. The high strength-to-weight properties
of forged and cast aluminum make it particularly well-suited for automotive
applications. The business unit's casting facility manufactures aluminum engine
manifolds for the automobile, truck and marine markets.
In 1995,1996, the engineered componentsproducts business unit had approximately 250993 customers, the largest
and top five of which accounted for approximately 34%13% and 77%31%, respectively, of
the business unit's revenue. See "- Competition." The engineered components business unit's headquarters is
located in Erie, Pennsylvania, and there isSales are made directly from
plants, as well as marketing locations across the United States.
In September 1996, KACC entered into a sales and engineering office
located in Detroit, Michigan, which worksletter of intent with car makers and other
customers, the Center for Technology (see "-Research and Development"Accuride
Corporation ("Accuride"), a business unit of Phelps Dodge Corporation, to form
a joint-venture to design, manufacture and plant personnelmarket aluminum wheels for the
commercial ground transportation industry. The formation of the joint venture,
subject to create new automotive component designs and improve
existing products.
8
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)various conditions including third-party consents, is expected to
occur in the second quarter of 1997.
Competition
Aluminum competes in many markets with steel, copper, glass, plastic, and
numerous other
materials. In recent years, plastic containers have increased and glass
containers have decreased their respective shares of the soft drink sector of
the beverage container market. In the United States, beverage container
materials, including aluminum, face increased competition from plastics as
increased polyethylene terephthalate ("PET") container capacity is brought on
line by plastics manufacturers. Within the aluminum business, KACC competes
with both domestic and foreign producers of bauxite, alumina and primary
aluminum, and with domestic and foreign fabricators. Many of KACC's competitors
have greater financial resources than KACC. KACC's principal competitors in the
sale of alumina include Alcoa Alumina and& Chemicals LLC,L.L.C., Billiton Marketing
and Trading BV, and Alcan Aluminium Limited. KACC competes with most aluminum
producers in the sale of primary aluminum.
Primary aluminum and, to some degree, alumina are commodities with generally
standard qualities, and competition in the sale of these commodities is based
primarily upon price, quality and availability. KACC also competes with a wide
range of domestic and international fabricators in the sale of fabricated
aluminum products. Competition in the sale of fabricated products is based upon
quality, availability, price and service, including delivery performance. KACC
concentrates its fabricating operations on selected products in which KACCit has
production expertise, high-quality capability, and geographic and other
competitive advantages. KaiserThe Company believes that, assuming the current
relationship between worldwide supply and demand for alumina and primary
aluminum does not change materially, the loss of any one of KACC's customers,
including intermediaries, would not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial condition or results of operations.
8
12
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
Research and Development
KACC conducts research and development activities principally at threetwo facilities
- - the Center for Technology ("CFT") in Pleasanton, California;California, and the Primary
Aluminum Products Division Technology Center ("DTC") adjacent to the Mead
smelter in Washington; and the Alumina Development Laboratory
("ADL") at the Gramercy, Louisiana, refinery, which supports Kaiser Alumina
Technical Services ("KATS") and the facilities of the alumina business
unit.Washington. Net expenditures for Company-sponsoredcompany-sponsored research and
development activities were $20.5 million in 1996, $18.5 million in 1995, and
$16.7 million in 1994, and $18.5
million in 1993.1994. KACC's research staff totaled 157156 at December 31, 1995.1996.
KACC estimates that research and development net expenditures will be
approximately $22.5$21.6 million in 1996.1997.
CFT performs research and development across a range of aluminum process and
product technologies to support KACC's business units and new business
opportunities. It also selectively offers technical services to third parties.
Significant efforts are directed at product and process technology for the
aircraft, automotive and can stock, aircraft and automotivesheet markets and aluminum reduction cell models
which are applied to improving cell designs and operating conditions. The largest and most notable single project being
developed at CFT is a strip-casting micromill process for producing can
sheet. The conversion and capital costs of these micromills are expected
to be significantly lower than conventional rolling mills and to result in
improved economics compared with historical manufacturing and
transportation costs for can stock. A pilot facility has been constructed
and operated at CFT. The first micromill is being constructed in Nevada as
a demonstration production facility, and KACC expects operational startup
of the facility at the end of 1996. KACC currently intends to finance the
cost of the construction of the Nevada micromill, estimated to be
approximately $45.0 million, from general corporate funds, including
possible borrowings under the 1994 Credit Agreement (defined below),
although KACC is in discussions with third parties which might provide some
or all of such funding. DTC
maintains specialized laboratories and a miniature carbon plant where
experiments with new anode and cathode technology are performed. DTC supports
KACC's primary aluminum smelters, and concentrates on the development of
cost-effective technical innovations such as equipment and process improvements.
KATS provides improved aluminaThe largest and most notable single project being developed at CFT and the
Reno, Nevada, facility is a unique Micromill(TM) casting facility for the
production of can sheet from molten metal using a continuous cast process. The
capital and conversion costs of the Company's Micromill(TM) facilities are
expected to be significantly lower than conventional rolling mills. The use of
a Micromill(TM) facility is also expected to result in lower transportation
costs due to the ability to strategically locate a Micromill(TM) facility in
close proximity to a manufacturing facility. Micromill(TM) facilities are
expected to be particularly well suited to take advantage of the rapid growth in
demand for can sheet expected in emerging markets in Asia and Latin America
where there is limited indigenous supply. KACC believes that Micromill(TM)
facilities should also be capable of manufacturing other sheet products at
relatively low capital and operating costs. The Micromill(TM) facility
technology is based on a proprietary thin-strip, high-speed, continuous-belt
casting technique linked directly to hot and cold rolling mills. The major
advantage of the process technologyis that the sheet is continuously manufactured from
molten metal, unlike the conventional process in which the metal is first cast
into large, solid ingots and subsequently rolled into sheet through a series of
highly capital-intensive steps. The first Micromill(TM) facility, which was
constructed in Nevada during 1996 as a demonstration and production facility,
achieved operational start-up in the fourth quarter of 1996. KACC expects that
the Nevada Micromill(TM) facility will be in a start-up mode for the first half
of 1997 and will be able to KACC's facilities and technical supportcommence limited shipments to new
business venturescustomers in cooperation with KACC's international business
development group.
9
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)the
second half of 1997. If KACC is actively engagedsuccessful in effortsproving and commercializing its
Micromill(TM) technology, Micromill(TM) facilities could represent an important
source of future growth. There can be no assurance that KACC will be able to
licensesuccessfully develop and commercialize the technology for use at full-scale
facilities. KACC is currently financing the capital cost of the construction of
the Nevada Micromill(TM) facility, estimated to be approximately $70.0 million,
from available general corporate resources.
KACC licenses its technology and sellsells technical and managerial assistance to
other producers worldwide. KACC's technology has been installed in alumina
refineries, aluminum smelters and rolling mills located in the United States,
Jamaica, Sweden, Germany, Russia, India, Australia, Korea, New Zealand, Ghana,
United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. KACC has technical services
contracts with smelters in Wales, Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and India.
KACC's revenue from technology sales and technical assistance to third parties
werewas $3.6 million in 1996, $5.7 million in 1995, and $10.0 million in 1994, and $12.8 million1994.
Business Development
KACC is actively pursuing opportunities to grow in 1993.
KACC has entered into agreements with respect to the Krasnoyarsk smelter in
Russia under which KACC has licensed certaintargeted areas of its
technology for use in
such facilityportfolio, by internal investment and agreed to provide purchasing services in obtaining
Western-sourced technologyby acquisition, both domestically and
equipment to be used in such facility.
These agreements were entered into in November 1990, and the services under
them are expected to be completed in 1996. In addition, in 1993internationally. KACC entered into agreements with respect to the Nadvoitsy smelter in Russia and
the Korba smelter of the Bharat Aluminum Co. Ltd., in India, under which
KACC has licensed certain of its technology for use in such facilities.
Services under the Nadvoitsy agreement were completed in 1995, and KACC
expects that services under the Korba agreement will be completed in 1996.
Operations in China
In 1994, KACC commenced effortsis pursuing opportunities to increase its activitiesparticipation in
certainemerging markets by using its technical expertise and capital to form joint
ventures or acquire equity in aluminum-related facilities in foreign countries
where it can apply its proprietary technology. KACC has created Kaiser Aluminum
International to identify growth opportunities in targeted emerging markets and
develop the needed country competence to complement KACC's product and process
competence in capitalizing on such opportunities. KACC has focused its efforts
on countries that are expected to be important suppliers of aluminum andand/or
large customers for aluminum and alumina.alumina, including Venezuela - where the
Company is the Qualified Operator in one of five consortia seeking to
participate in the privatization of Venezuela's aluminum industry - the PRC,
technology has been installed by KACC intends to use its technical
skills, together with capital investments, to form joint ventures or
acquire equityat various third party locations
throughout the world and is an integral part of KACC's initiatives for
participating in facilities in such countries.new and existing smelting facilities. See "-Research and
Development."
9
13
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
In 1995, Kaiser Yellow River Investment Limited ("KYRIL"), a subsidiary of the
Company, was formed to participate in the privatization, modernization,
expansion, and operation of aluminum smelting facilities in the PRC. KYRIL
has entered into a Joint Venture Agreement and related agreements (the
"Joint Venture Agreements") with the Lanzhou Aluminum Smelters ("LAS") of the
China National Nonferrous Metals Industry Corporation relating to the formation
and operation of Yellow River Aluminum Industry Company Limited, a Sino-foreign
joint equity enterprise organized under PRC law (the "Joint Venture"). The Joint Venture constitutes the first large-scale privatization in the
Chinese aluminum smelting industry. The Joint Venture's assets and
operations are located primarily in the industrial city of Lanzhou, the
capital of Gansu Province in northwestern China, and in nearby Lianhai, a
special economic zone also in Gansu Province. The smelter at Lanzhou is
the fifth largest aluminum smelter in the PRC and produces approximately
55,000 tons of primary aluminum per year. The smelter at Lianhai produces
approximately 30,000 tons of primary aluminum per year. LAS's capital
contribution to the Joint Venture consisted primarily of the Lanzhou and
Lianhai smelters.
The Joint Venture Agreements include provisions for KYRIL to contribute up
to $59.7 million to the Joint Venture in exchange for up to a 49% interest
in the Joint Venture (the "Capital Contribution") and contemplate that such
capital may be used to expand the annual production capacity of LAS from
85,000 to 115,000 tons, construct a dry Soderberg paste plant, install and
upgrade pollution control equipment, and provide for general corporate
purposes, including working capital. KYRIL
contributed $9.0 million as a
contribution to the capital of the Joint Venture in July 1995. The
parties to the Joint Venture are currently engaged in discussions concerning
the amount, timing and other conditions relating to KYRIL's additional
contributions tofuture of the Joint Venture. Governmental approval in the PRC will be
necessary in order to implement any arrangements agreed to by the parties, and
there can be no assurance such approvals will be obtained. At a meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Joint Venture held on January 16, 1997, LAS reported
that negotiations had begun with an investor which might be interested in
buying KYRIL's interest in the Joint Venture. In light of such report, the
directors adopted a resolution that, among other things, (i) contained an
agreement to continue until June 30, 1997, discussions concerning the future of
the Joint Venture, (ii) provided that KYRIL granted to LAS the right to seek a
buyer to purchase KYRIL's equity interest in the Joint Venture, and (iii)
provided that if a buyer to purchase KYRIL's equity interest in the Joint
Venture was not found by June 30, 1997, the Joint Venture would be terminated
and dissolved.
KACC, through its extrudedengineered products business unit, has entered into contracts to
form two small joint venture companiesventures in the PRC. KACC will
indirectly acquireacquired equity
interests of approximately 45% and 49%, respectively, in these two companies
which will manufacture aluminum extrusions, in exchange for the contribution to
those companies of certain used equipment, technology, services and cash. The
majority equity interests in the two companies will beare owned by affiliates of
Guizhou Guang Da Construction Company.
10
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
Employees
During 1995,1996, KACC employed an average of 9,5469,567 persons, compared with an
average of 9,546 employees in 1995, and 9,744 employees in 1994, and 10,220 employees in 1993.1994. At December
31, 1995,1996, KACC's work force was 9,624,9,509, including a domestic work force of
5,946,5,925, of whom 4,0103,974 were paid at an hourly rate. Most hourly paid domestic
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with various labor
unions. Approximately 74%75% of such employees are covered by a master agreement
(the "Labor Contract") with the United Steelworkers of America ("USWA") expiringwhich
expires September 30, 1998. The Labor Contract covers KACC's plants in Spokane
(Trentwood and Mead) and Tacoma, Washington; Gramercy, Louisiana; and Newark,
Ohio.
The Labor Contract replaced a
contract that expired October 31, 1994, and was reached after an eight-day
work stoppage by the USWA at these plants in February 1995.
The Labor Contract provides for base wages at all covered plants. In addition,
workers covered by the Labor Contract may receive quarterly or more frequent
bonus payments based on various indices of profitability, productivity,
efficiency, and other aspects of specific plant or departmental performance, as
well as, in certain cases, the price of alumina or primary aluminum. Pursuant
to the Labor Contract, base wage rates were raised effective January 2, 1995,
were raised again effective November 6, 1995, and will be raised an additional
amount effective November 3, 1997, and an amount in respect of the cost of
living adjustment under the previous master agreement will be phased into base
wages during the term of the Labor Contract. In the second quarter of 1995,
KACC acquired up to $2,000 of preference stock held in a stock plan for the
benefit of each of approximately 82% of thecertain employees covered by the Labor Contract and in the first
half of 1998 will acquire up to an additional $4,000 of such preference stock
held in such plan for the benefit of substantially the same employees. In
addition, a profitability test was satisfied and, therefore, KACC will acquireacquired
during 1996 up to an additional $1,000 of such preference stock held in such
plan for the benefit of substantially the same employees. KACC made and will make
comparable
acquisitions of preference stock held for the benefit of each of
certain salaried
employees.
In February 1995,The contract covering Alpart's employees engagedexpired in a six-day work stoppage by
its National Workers Union, which was settled by a new contract.April 1996, and contract
negotiations are ongoing.
Management considers KACC's employee relations to be satisfactory.
Environmental Matters
KaiserThe Company and KACC are subject to a wide variety of international, federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations (the "Environmental Laws"). From time to time the Environmental Laws are amended and new ones
are adopted.
The Environmental Laws regulate, among other things, air and water emissions
and discharges; the generation, storage, treatment, transportation, and
disposal of solid and hazardous waste; the release of hazardous or toxic
substances, pollutants and contaminants into the environment; and, in certain
instances, the environmental condition of industrial property prior to transfer
or sale. In addition, Kaiserthe Company and KACC are subject to various federal,
state, and local workplace health and safety laws and regulations ("Health
Laws").
10
14
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
From time to time, KACC is subject, with respect to its current and former
operations, to fines or penalties assessed for alleged breaches of the
Environmental and Health Laws and to claims and litigation brought by federal,
state or local agencies and by private parties seeking remedial or other
enforcement action under the Environmental and Health Laws or damages related
to alleged injuries to health or to the environment, including claims with
respect to certain waste disposal sites and the remediation of sites presently
or formerly operated by KACC. See "Legal Proceedings." KACC currently is
subject to a number of lawsuits under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("CERCLA"). KACC, along with certain other
entities, has been named as a Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP") for
remedial costs at certain third-party 11
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (continued)
sites listed on the National Priorities
List under CERCLA and, in certain instances, may be exposed to joint and
several liability for those costs or damages to natural resources. KACC's Mead,
Washington, facility has been listed on the National Priorities List under
CERCLA. By letter dated June 18, 1996, the Washington State Department of
Ecology advised KACC that there are several options for remediation at the Mead
facility that would be acceptable to the Department. KACC expects that one of
these remedial options will be agreed upon and incorporated into a Consent
Decree in 1997. In addition, in connection with certain of its asset sales,
KACC has agreed to indemnify the purchasers with respect to certain liabilities
(and associated expenses) resulting from acts or omissions arising prior to
such dispositions, including environmental liabilities.
While uncertainties are
inherent in the final outcome of these matters, and it is presently
impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred,
Kaiser believes that the resolution of such uncertainties should not have a
material adverse effect on KACC's consolidated financial position, results
of operations, or liquidity.
Environmental capital spending was $9.2 million in 1995, $11.9 million in
1994, and $12.6 million in 1993. Annual operating costs for pollution
control, not including corporate overhead or depreciation, were
approximately $26.0 million in 1995, $23.1 million in 1994, and $22.4
million in 1993. Legislative, regulatory, and economic uncertainties make
it difficult to project future spending for these purposes. However,
Kaiser currently anticipates that in the 1996-1997 period, environmental
capital spending will be within the range of $27.0 - $33.0 million per
year, and operating costs for pollution control will be within the range of
$28.0 - $29.0 million per year. In addition, $4.5 million in cash
expenditures in 1995, $3.6 million in 1994, and $7.2 million in 1993 were
charged to previously established reserves relating to environmental costs.
Approximately $8.4 million is expected to be charged to such reserves in
1996.
Based on Kaiser'sthe Company's evaluation of these and other environmental matters, Kaiserthe
Company has established environmental accruals, primarily related to potential
solid waste disposal and soil and groundwater remediation matters. At December
31, 1996, the balance of such accruals, which are primarily included in
Long-term liabilities, was $33.3 million. These environmental accruals
represent the Company's estimate of costs reasonably expected to be incurred
based on presently enacted laws and regulations, currently available facts,
existing technology, and the Company's assessment of the likely remediation to
be performed. The Company expects remediation to occur over the next several
years and estimates that annual expenditures to be charged to these
environmental accruals will be approximately $3.0 to $9.0 million for the years
1997 through 2001 and an aggregate of approximately $6.0 million thereafter.
Cash expenditures of $8.8 million in 1996, $4.5 million in 1995, and $3.6
million in 1994 were charged to previously established accruals relating to
environmental costs. Approximately $9.3 million is expected to be charged to
such accruals in 1997.
As additional facts are developed and definitive remediation plans and
necessary regulatory approvals for implementation of remediation are
established or alternative technologies are developed, changes in these and
other factors may result in actual costs exceeding the current environmental
accruals. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that costs
associated with these environmental matters may exceed current accruals by
amounts that could range, in the aggregate, up to an estimated $24.0 million
and that, subject to further regulatory review and approval, the factors upon
which a substantial portion of this estimate is based are expected to be
resolved over the next twelve months. While uncertainties are inherent in the
final outcome of these environmental matters, and it is presently impossible to
determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred, the Company
currently believes that the resolution of such uncertainties should not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity. In addition to cash expenditures charged
to environmental accruals, environmental capital spending was $18.4 million in
1996, $9.2 million in 1995, and $11.9 million in 1994. Annual operating costs
for pollution control, not including corporate overhead or depreciation, were
approximately $30.1 million in 1996, $26.0 million in 1995, and $23.1 million in
1994. Legislative, regulatory and economic uncertainties make it difficult to
project future spending for these purposes. However, the Company currently
anticipates that in the 1997-1998 period, environmental capital spending will be
within the range of approximately $6.0 million to $16.0 million per year, and
operating costs for pollution control will be within the range of $30.0 million
to $31.0 million per year. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Environmental Contingencies."Contingencies" in
the Annual Report. The portion of Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Annual Report under the heading "Environmental Contingencies"
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The locations and general character of the principal plants, mines, and other
materially important physical properties relating to KACC's operations are
described in "Business - The Company - Production Operations" and those
descriptions are incorporated herein by reference. KACC owns in fee or leases
all the real estate and facilities used in connection with its business. Plants
and equipment and other facilities are generally in good condition and suitable
for their intended uses, subject to changing environmental requirements.
Although KACC's domestic aluminum smelters and alumina facility were initially
designed early in KACC's history, they have been modified frequently over the
years to incorporate technological advances in order to improve
11
15
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES (CONTINUED)
efficiency, increase capacity, and achieve energy savings. KaiserThe Company believes
that KACC's domestic plants are cost competitive on an international basis.
Due to KACC's
variable cost structure, the plants' operating costs are relatively lower
in periods of low primary aluminum prices and relatively higher in periods
of high primary aluminum prices.
KACC's obligations under the Credit Agreement entered into on February 17,15,
1994, as amended (the "1994 Credit"Credit Agreement"), are secured by, among other things,
mortgages on KACC's major domestic plants (other than the Gramercy alumina
plant)refinery and Nevada Micromill(TM)). See "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - LiquidityFinancing Activities and
Capital Resources -
Capital Structure"Liquidity" in the Annual Report.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
This section contains statements which constitute "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See
Item 1, above, for cautionary information with respect to such forward-looking
statements.
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps Site Matter
The Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps Site, listed on the Superfund National Priorities
List, is composed of five separate sites around the town of Aberdeen, North
Carolina (collectively, the "Sites"). The Sites are of concern to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") because of their past use as
either pesticide formulation facilities or pesticide 12
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (continued)
disposal areas from
approximately the mid-1930's through the late-1980's. The United States
originally filed a cost recovery complaint (the(as amended, the "Complaint") in the
United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina,
Rockingham Division, No. C-89-231-R, which, as amended, includes KACC and a
number of other defendants. The Complaint as amended, seeks reimbursement for past and
future response costs and a determination of liability of the defendants under
Section 107 of CERCLA.
The EPA has performed a Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Study and issued a Record of Decision ("ROD") for
the Sites in September 1991. The estimated cost of the major soil
remediation remedy selected for the Sites is approximately $32 million.
Other possible remedies described in the ROD would have estimated costs of
approximately $53 million and $222 million, respectively. The EPA has
stated that it has incurred past costs at the Sites in the range of $7.5-$8
million as of February 9,In 1993 and alleges that response costs will
continue to be incurred in the future.
On May 20, 1993,1994, the EPA issued three unilateral Administrative Orders under Section
106(a) of CERCLA ordering the respondents, including KACC, to perform the soil
remedial design and remedial action described in the RODand groundwater remediation for three of
the Sites. The estimated cost as set forth in the ROD for the
remedial action at the three Sites is approximately $27 million. AIn addition to KACC, a number of other companies are also named as
respondents. KACC has entered into ainterim PRP Participation AgreementAgreements with
certain of the respondents (the "Aberdeen
Site PRP Group" or the "Group") to participate jointly in responding
to the Administrative Orders, dated May 20, 1993, regarding soil remediation, to share costs incurred on an interim basis, and
to seek to reach a final allocation of costs through agreement or to allow such
final allocation and determination of liability to be made by the United States
District Court.
By letter dated July 6, 1993,In March 1997, certain members of the Group, including KACC, has notifiedentered into a
Settlement Agreement and Participation Agreement which allocates one hundred
percent of all costs incurred or to be incurred for work at each of the EPA of its ongoing
participation with such group of respondents which, as a group, are
intending to complyfive
Sites. Negotiations with the Administrative Orders to the extent consistent
with applicable law. By letters dated December 30, 1993, the EPA notified
KACCUnited States Department of its potential liability for, and requested that KACC, along with a
number of other companies, undertake or agree to finance, groundwater
remediation at certain of the Sites. The ROD-selected remedy for the
groundwater remediation selected by EPA includes a variety of techniques.
The EPA has estimated the total present worth cost, including thirty years
of operation and maintenance, at approximately $11.8 million. On June 22,
1994, the EPA issued two unilateral Administrative Orders under Section
106(a) of CERCLA ordering the respondents, including KACC, to undertake the
groundwater remediation at three of the Sites. A PRP Participation
Agreement with respect to groundwater remediation has been entered into by
certain of the respondents, including KACC.
By letter dated March 6, 1996, KACC gave notice of withdrawal from the
Aberdeen Site PRP Group pursuant to the provisions of the PRP Participation
Agreement. KACC advised the GroupJustice ("DOJ") and
the EPA concerning an acceptable consent decree to resolve the outstanding
litigation in whole or in part commenced during the first quarter of 1997.
Based on current estimates of future costs, the Company believes that even if it were liable
for cleanupits
aggregate financial exposure at thethese Sites which it expressly denies, it had already
contributed far moreis less than its allocable potential share of response costs.
KACC has advised the Group and the EPA that it has fully complied with the
Unilateral Orders and that should additional evidence be presented which
demonstrates KACC's liability in excess of the amount contributed to date,
KACC would be willing to discuss the matter further at that time.$2.0 million.
United States of America v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation
In February 1989, a civil action was filed by the United States Department
of Justice (the "DOJ")DOJ at the request of the EPA
against KACC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Washington, Case No. C-89-106-CLQ. The complaint alleged that emissions from
certain stacks at KACC's Trentwood facility in Spokane, Washington,
intermittently violated the opacity standard contained in the Washington State
Implementation Plan ("SIP"), approved by the EPA under the federal Clean Air
Act. The
complaint sought injunctive relief, including an order that KACC take all
necessary action to achieve compliance with the SIP opacity limit and the
assessment of civil penalties of not more than $25,000 per day.
KACC and the EPA, without adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and
without any admission of the violations alleged in the underlying complaint,
have entered into a Consent Decree, which was approved by a Consent Order
entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Washington in January 1996. As approved, the Consent Decree
13
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (continued) settles the
underlying disputes and requires KACC to (i) pay a $.5 million civil penalty
(which penalty has been paid), (ii) complete a program of plant improvements
and operational changes that began in 1990 at its Trentwood facility, including
the installation of an emission control system to capture particulate emissions
from certain furnaces, and (iii) achieve and maintain furnace compliance with
the opacity standard in the SIP by no later than February 28, 1997. The CompanyWashington SIP. KACC anticipates that capital
expenditures for the environmental upgrade of the furnace operation at its
Trentwood facility, including the improvements and changes required by the
Consent Decree, will be approximately $20.0 million.
12
16
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED)
Catellus Development Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and
James L. Ferry & Son Inc.
In January 1991, the City of Richmond, et al. (the "Plaintiffs") filed a Second
Amended Complaint for Damages and Declaratory Relief against the United States,
Catellus Development Corporation ("Catellus") and other defendants
(collectively, the "Defendants") alleging, among other things, that the
Defendants caused or allowed hazardous substances, pollutants, contaminants,
debris and other solid wastes to be discharged, deposited, disposed of or
released on certain property located in Richmond, California (the "Property"),
formerly owned by Catellus and leased to KACC for the purpose of shipbuilding
activities conducted by KACC on behalf of the United States during World War
II. The Plaintiffs sought recovery of response costs and natural resource
damages under CERCLA. Certain of the Plaintiffs alleged that they had incurred
or expected to incur costs and damages of approximately $49.0 million. Catellus
subsequently filed a third party complaint (the "Third Party Complaint")
against KACC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California, Case No. C-89-2935 DLJ. Thereafter, the Plaintiffs filed a separate
complaint against KACC, Case No. C-92-4176. The Plaintiffs settled their CERCLA
and tort claims against the United States for $3.5 million plus thirty-five
percent (35%) of future response costs.
The trial involving this case commenced in March 1995. During the trial,
Plaintiffs settled their claims against Catellus in exchange for payment of
approximately $3.25$3.3 million. Subsequently, on June 2,On December 7, 1995, the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California issued an
order on the remaining claims in that action. On December 7, 1995, the
District Court issued the Final Judgmenta final judgment on those claims concluding that KACC is liable
for various costs and interest, aggregating approximately $2.2 million, fifty
percent (50%) of future costs of cleaning up certain parts of the Property, and
certain fees and costs associated specifically with the claim by Catellus
against KACC. KACC paid the City of Richmond $1.8 million in partial
satisfaction of this judgment. In January 1996, Catellus filed a notice of
appeal with respect to its indemnity judgment against KACC. KACC has since
filed a notice of cross appeal as to the Court's decision adjudicating that
KACC is obligated to indemnify Catellus. In FebruaryOn July 8, 1996, the Court issued an
order awarding Plaintiffs nominal costs, which amount has been paid. The order
also awarded Catellus de minimis costs. Catellus has filed motions, which KACC intends to contest, seeking
reimbursementa notice of appeal.
On August 12, 1996, the Court issued an order granting the Catellus motion for
attorneys' fees and costs from KACC in the aggregate amount of $2.76approximately $.9 million. Based on KACC's estimateKACC and Catellus
have filed notices of future costs of cleanup, resolution
ofappeal with respect to the Catellus matter is not expected to have a material adverse effect on
Kaiser's consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.attorneys' fees award.
Waste Inc. Superfund Site
On December 8, 1995, the EPA issued a unilateral Administrative Order for
Remedial Design and Remedial Action under CERCLA to KACC and thirty-one other
respondents for remedial design and action at the Waste Inc. Superfund Site at
Michigan City, Indiana. This site was operated as a landfill from 1965 to 1982.
KACC is alleged to have arranged for the disposal of waste from its
formerly-owned plant at Wanatah, Indiana, during the period from 1964 to 1972.
In its RecordMay 1996, KACC entered into a Participation Agreement with thirteen of Decision, the
EPA estimatedrespondents to perform the work required under the Administrative Order, under
which KACC will pay 2.79% of the cost of remedial design and work at the work to be performed to have a present value of $15.7
million. KACC's share of the total waste sent to the site is unknown. A
consultant retained by a group of PRPs estimated that KACC contributed 2.0%
of the waste sent to the site by the forty-one largest contributors.
KACC's ultimate exposure will depend on the number of PRPs that participate
and the volume of waste properly allocable to KACC.Site.
Based on the EPA'scurrent cost estimate,estimates, KACC believes that its financial exposure for
remedial design and remedial action at this site is less than $500,000. A PRP
participation agreement is under negotiation.
14
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (continued)$.5 million.
Hammons v. Alcan Aluminum Corp. et al
On March 5, 1996, a class action complaint was filed in California against the Company, Alcan
Aluminum Corp., Aluminum Company of America, Alumax, Inc, Reynolds Metal
Company, and the Aluminum Association and others in the Superior Court of California for
the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC145612. The complaint claims that the
defendants conspired, in violation of state antitrust laws, to raise, stabilize and maintain the price of
primary aluminum and aluminum products through cutsCalifornia Cartwright Act (Bus. &
Prof. Code ss.16720 & 16750), in production allegedly
in connectionconjunction with the ratification of a Memorandum of Understanding
("MOU") entered into in 1994 by representatives of the authorities of Australia, Canada, the
European Union, Norway, the Russian Federation and the United States.States to
restrict the production of primary aluminum resulting in rises in prices for
primary aluminum and aluminum products. The complaint seeks certification of a
class consisting of persons who at any time between January 1, 1994, and the
date of the complaint purchased aluminum or aluminum products manufactured by
one or more of the defendants and estimates damages sustained by the class to
be $4.4 billion during the year 1994, before trebling. Plaintiff's counsel has
estimated damages to be $4.4 billion per year for each of the two years the MOU
was active, which when trebled equals $26.4 billion. On April 2, 1996, the case
was removed to the United States District Court for the Central District of
California. On July 11, 1996, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of
the Company and other defendants and dismissed the complaint as to all
defendants. On July 18, 1996, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
13
17
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED)
Matheson et al v. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation et al
On September 11, 1995, Kaiser announced that it had appointed an
independent committee of its Board of Directors to consider a possible
recapitalization transaction. On February 5, 1996, Kaiser publicly
announced that it had filed a preliminary proxy statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission relating to a proposed recapitalization.
A special shareholders' meeting to consider the recapitalization was
subsequently scheduled for April 10, 1996, and the definitive proxy
statement was mailed to shareholders commencing on March 20, 1996. See
Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company,
under the heading Proposed Recapitalization, at pages 50-51 of the Annual
Report for a description of the proposed recapitalization. On March 19, 1996, a lawsuit was filed against MAXXAM, Kaiser,the Company, and Kaiser'sthe
Company's directors challenging and seeking to enjoin a proposed
recapitalization of the recapitalizationCompany (the "Proposed Recapitalization") and the April
10, 1996, special shareholders' meeting.stockholders meeting at which the Proposed Recapitalization
was to be considered. The suit, which is entitled Matheson et alal. v. Kaiser
Aluminum Corporation et alal. (No. 14900) and was filed in the Delaware Court of
Chancery, purports to be a class action by persons who as
of March 18, 1996 (the record date for the April 10, 1996, meeting) owned
Kaiser's outstanding common stock and 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred
Stock ("PRIDES"). Plaintiffs allege,alleges, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duties by certain
defendants and that the proposed
recapitalizationProposed Recapitalization violates Delaware law and the
certificate of designationdesignations for the PRIDES. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, rescission,
rescissory damagesCompany's 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible
Preferred Stock (the "PRIDES"). On April 8, 1996, the Delaware Court of
Chancery issued a ruling which preliminarily enjoined the Company from
implementing the Proposed Recapitalization. On April 19, 1996, the Delaware
Supreme Court granted the Company's motion to consider, on an expedited basis,
the Company's appeal of the preliminary injunction and other relief. A hearingon May 1, 1996, the
Company's stockholders approved the Proposed Recapitalization which was not
implemented at that time due to the pending appeal. On August 29, 1996, the
Delaware Supreme Court upheld the preliminary injunction and remanded the case
to the Court of Chancery. On September 24, 1996, the plaintiffs filed a motion
to make permanent the temporary injunction issued on April 8, 1996. On
September 27, 1996, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a resolution
abandoning the Proposed Recapitalization. On October 2, 1996, the Company filed
a motion in the Delaware Court of Chancery to dismiss the shareholder
litigation relating to the Proposed Recapitalization on the ground of mootness
and filed a response to plaintiffs' motion for injunctive reliefentry of a permanent injunction.
Thereafter, plaintiffs' attorneys filed their fee application, and briefing was
submitted by both sides on whether a permanent injunction was needed, and the
amount of the fee to which plaintiffs' attorneys were entitled. On March 18,
1997, plaintiffs withdrew their motion for a permanent injunction, leaving their
fee application as the only issue for the Court of Chancery to consider. After
oral argument on March 25, 1997, the Court of Chancery awarded plaintiffs'
attorneys fees and expenses in the total amount of $.8 million. It is
presently scheduled for April 8, 1996.anticipated that the Court of Chancery will sign an order, approved as to form
by all parties, awarding such fees, dissolving the preliminary injunction, and
dismissing plaintiffs' case with prejudice. The decision to abandon the
Proposed Recapitalization does not preclude a recapitalization from being
proposed to the stockholders of the Company in the future.
Asbestos-related Litigation
KACC is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, some of which involve claims of
multiple persons, in which the plaintiffs allege that certain of their injuries
were caused by, among other things, exposure to asbestos during, and as a
result of, their employment or association with KACC or exposure to products
containing asbestos produced or sold by KACC. The lawsuits generally relate to
products KACC has not manufactured for at least 15 years. At December 31, 1995, the number of such claims pending was
approximately 59,700, as compared with 25,200 at December 31, 1994. In
1995, approximately 41,700 of such claims were received and 7,200 settled
or dismissed. KACC has been advised by its regional counsel that, although
there can be no assurance, the recent increase in pending claims may be
attributable in part to tort reform legislation in Texas which was passed
by the legislature in March 1995 and which became effective on September 1,
1995. The legislation, among other things, is designed to restrict,
beginning September 1, 1995, the filing of cases in Texas that do not have
a sufficient nexus to that jurisdiction, and to impose, generally as of
September 1, 1996, limitations relating to joint and several liability in
tort cases. A substantial portion of the asbestos-related claims that were
filed and served on KACC between June 30, 1995, and November 30, 1995, were
filed in Texas prior to September 1, 1995. For additional
information, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Asbestos Contingencies."Contingencies" in the Annual Report. The
portion of Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Annual Report under the heading "Asbestos Contingencies" is incorporated
herein by reference.
15
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (continued)
OtherDOJ Proceedings
On August 24, 1994, the DOJ issued Civil Investigative Demand No. 11356 ("CID
No. 11356") requesting information from Kaiserthe Company regarding (i) its
production, capacity to produce, and sales of primary aluminum from January 1,
1991, to the date of the response; (ii) any actual or contemplated reduction in
its production of primary aluminum during that period; and (iii) any
communications with others regarding any actual, contemplated, possible or
desired reductions in primary aluminum production by Kaiserthe Company or any of its
competitors during that period. ManagementThe Company's management believes that Kaiser'sthe
Company's actions have at all times been appropriate, and Kaiserthe Company has
submitted documents and interrogatory answers to the DOJ responding to CID No.
11356.
On March 27, 1995, the DOJ issued Civil Investigative Demand No. 12503 ("CID
No. 12503"), as part of an industry-wide investigation, requesting information
from KACC regarding (i) any actual or contemplated changes in its method of
pricing can stocksheet from January 1, 1994, through March 31, 1995, (ii) the
percentage of aluminum scrap and primary aluminum ingot used by KACC to produce
can stocksheet and the manner in which KACC's cost of acquiring aluminum scrap is
factored into its can stocksheet prices, and (iii) any communications with others
regarding any actual or contemplated changes in its method of pricing can stocksheet
from January 1, 1994, through March 31, 1995. KaiserManagement believes that KACC's
actions have at all times been appropriate, and KACC has submitted documents
and interrogatory answers to the DOJ responding to CID No. 12503. KACC was
informed in November 1996 that the DOJ has officially closed its investigation
and has returned the documents submitted by KACC.
14
18
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED)
Other Matters
Various other lawsuits and claims are pending against KACC. While uncertainties
are inherent in the final outcome of such matters and it is presently
impossible to determine the actual costs that ultimately may be incurred,
management believes that the resolution of such uncertainties and the
incurrence of such costs should not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of the Company during the
fourth quarter of 1995.1996.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's common stockCommon Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "KLU". The number of record holders of the Company's common
stockCommon Stock at
March 15, 199614, 1997, was 169.160. Page 5948 of the Annual Report, and the information in
Note 74 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading
"Dividends on Common Stock""Loan Covenants and Restrictions" at page 50pages 29-30 of the Annual Report, are
incorporated herein by reference. The Company has not paid any dividends on its
common stockCommon Stock during the two most recent fiscal years.
The 1994 Credit Agreement (Exhibits 4.64.8 through 4.114.16 to this Report) contains
restrictions on the ability of the Company to pay dividends on or make
distributions on account of the Company's common stock,Common Stock, and the 1994 Credit
Agreement and the Indentures (Exhibits 4.1 through 4.54.7 to this Report) contain
restrictions on the ability of the Company's subsidiaries to transfer funds to
the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. Exhibits 4.1
through 4.114.16 to this Report, Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements at pages 37-3929-30 of the Annual Report, and the information under the
heading "Liquidityheadings "Financing Activities and Capital Resources -
CapitalLiquidity" and "Capital Structure" at pages
22-2417-18 of the Annual Report, are incorporated herein by reference.
16
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected financial data for the Company is incorporated herein by reference to
the table at page 3 of this Report, to the table at page 2012 of the Annual
Report, to the discussion under the heading "Results of Operations"
at page 21 of the Annual Report, to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at pages
33-3525-27 of the Annual Report, and to pages 57-5846-47 of the Annual Report.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Pages 20-2812-20 of the Annual Report are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Pages 29-5621-45 and page 5948 of the Annual Report are incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
Information required under PART III (Items 10, 11, 12, and 13) has been omitted
from this Report since the Company intends to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal
year, a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A which involves
the election of directors.
15
19
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Index to Financial Statements and SchedulesINDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
1. Financial Statements
--------------------
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Report of
Independent Public Accountants, and Quarterly Financial Data
are included on pages 29-5621-45 and 5948 of the Annual Report.
2. Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . PageSchedules.............................Page
----------------------------- ----
Report of Independent Public Accountants. . . . . . . . 19Accountants...................17
Schedule I - Condensed Balance Sheets - Parent Company,
Condensed Statements of Income - Parent
Company, Condensed Statements of Cash
Flows - Parent Company, and Notes to
Condensed Financial Statements -
Parent Company . . . . . . . . . . . .20-23...........................18-21
All other schedules are inapplicable or the required
information is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or the Notes thereto.
17
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -----------------------------------------------------
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K (continued)
3. Exhibits
--------
Reference is made to the Index of Exhibits immediately
preceding the exhibits hereto (beginning on page 25),
which index is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No Report on Form 8-K was filed by the Company during the last
quarter of the period covered by this Report.
(c) Exhibits
Reference is made to the Index of Exhibits immediately
preceding the exhibits hereto (beginning on page 25)23), which
index is incorporated herein by reference.
18(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Three Reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the
last quarter of the period covered by this Report. One Report on
Form 8-K, dated October 2, 1996, stated that the Board of
Directors of the Company had adopted a resolution abandoning a
proposed recapitalization of the Company, and contained
information concerning an action entitled Matheson et al. v.
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation et al. One Report on Form 8-K, dated
October 10, 1996, stated that on October 7, 1996, KACC announced
in a press release that it proposes to make a Rule 144A offering
of $175 million principal amount of senior notes due 2006. One
Report on Form 8-K, dated October 23, 1996, stated that on
October 17, 1996, KACC announced in a press release that it had
priced its Rule 144A offering of $175 million principal amount of
10 7/8% Senior Notes due 2006 at 99.5% of their principal amount
to yield 10.96% to maturity.
(c) EXHIBITS
Reference is made to the Index of Exhibits immediately preceding
the exhibits hereto (beginning on page 23), which index is
incorporated herein by reference.
16
20
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We have audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
financial statements included in Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Subsidiaries'subsidiaries'
annual report to shareholders incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and
have issued our report thereon dated February 16, 1996.14, 1997. Our audit was made for
the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a
whole. Schedule I listed in the index at Item 14(a)2. above is the
responsibility of the Company's management and is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in theour audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the
financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
Arthur AndersenARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas
February 16, 1996
1914, 1997
17
21
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS - PARENT COMPANY
(In millions of dollars, except share amounts)
December 31,
--------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- --------
AssetsASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ .2 $ 5.7.2
Note receivable from KACC 8.6 10.7 21.2
-------- --------
Total current assets 8.6 10.9 26.9
Note receivable from KACC 8.6
23.5
Investments -Investment in KACC 1,641.2 1,521.3 1,361.0
-------- --------
Total $1,649.8 $1,540.8 $1,411.4
======== ========
Liabilities and Stockholders' EquityLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities $ 3.32.4 $ 6.43.3
Intercompany note payable to KACC, including accrued interest 1,578.1 1,479.8 1,387.7
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.05, authorized 20,000,000 shares; Series A
Convertible, stated value $.10 issued and outstanding, nil and 1,938,295
in 1995 and 1994 .2
PRIDES Convertible, par value $.05, issued and outstanding, 8,673,850 and
8,855,550 in 1995 and 1994 .4 .4
Common stock, par value $.01, authorized 100,000,000 shares;shares: issued and
outstanding 71,646,789 and 71,638,514 in 1996 and 58,205,083 in 1995 and 1994 .7 .6.7
Additional capital 531.1 530.3 527.8
Accumulated deficit (460.1) (459.9) (502.6)
Additional minimum pension liability (2.8) (13.8) (9.1)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 69.3 57.7 17.3
-------- --------
Total $1,649.8 $1,540.8 $1,411.4
======== ========
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
2018
22
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - PARENT COMPANY
(In millions of dollars)
December 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- -------
Equity in income (loss) of KACC $ 108.7 $ 152.8 $ (20.4) $(537.2)
Administrative and general expenses (2.2) (.4) (.3)
(.4)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense (98.3) (92.1) (86.1) (115.8)
Other income 1.2
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) $ 8.2 $ 60.3 $(106.8) $(652.2)
======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
2119
23
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - PARENT COMPANY
(In millions of dollars)
December 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 8.2 $ 60.3 $(106.8) $(652.2)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
(used for) operating activities:
Equity in (income) loss of KACC (108.7) (152.8) 20.4 537.2
Accrued interest on intercompany note payable to KACC 98.3 92.1 86.1 115.8
Increase (decrease) in othercurrent liabilities (.9) .2 .3 (1.0)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used for operating activities (.2)(3.1) (.2)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in KACC (.1) (1.2) (66.9) (81.5)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used for investing activities (.1) (1.2) (66.9) (81.5)
------- ------- -------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid (10.5) (20.8) (14.8) (6.3)
Capital stock issued .1 1.2 100.1
119.3
Intercompany notesnote issued by KACC - net 13.4 15.5 (13.2) (31.5)
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities 3.0 (4.1) 72.1 81.5
------- ------- -------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year (.2) (5.5) 5.2 (.2)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year .2 5.7 .5 .7
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ $ .2 $ 5.7 $ .5
======= ======= =======
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
Non-cash investment in KACC $ 9.9 $ 15.0
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
2220
24
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE I
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - PARENT COMPANY
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying parent company financial statements ofBASIS OF PRESENTATION
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation ("Kaiser"(the "Company") should be read in conjunction
with the 1995 consolidated financial statements of Kaiser and
Subsidiary Companies.
Kaiser is a holding company and
conducts its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, Kaiser
Aluminum & Chemical Corporation ("KACC"), which is reported herein using
the equity method of accounting. The accompanying, parent company
condensed financial statements of the Company should be read in
conjunction with the 1996 consolidated financial statements of Kaiser
Aluminum Corporation and Subsidiary Companies ("Kaiser").
2. Intercompany Note PayableINTERCOMPANY NOTE PAYABLE
The Intercompany Note to KACC, wasas amended, in July 1993 to
decrease theprovides for a fixed interest
rate from 13% to 6-5/of 6 5/8%. No interest or principal payments are due until December 31,
2000, after which interest and principal will be payable over a 15-year term
pursuant to a predetermined schedule.
3. Restricted Net AssetsRESTRICTED NET ASSETS
The investment in KACC is substantially unavailable to Kaiserthe Company pursuant
to the terms of certain debt instruments. The obligations of KACC in respect
of the credit facilities under the 1994 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Kaiserthe
Company and substantially by all significant subsidiaries of KACC. See Note
4 of the Notes to Kaiser's Consolidated Financial Statements.
2321
25
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION
Date: March 27, 19961997 By George T. Haymaker, Jr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
George T. Haymaker, Jr.
Chairman of the Board,
President, and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 27, 19961997 George T. Haymaker, Jr.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
George T. Haymaker, Jr.
Chairman of the Board,
President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 27, 19961997 John T. La Duc
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. La Duc
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: March 27, 19961997 Arthur S. Donaldson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur S. Donaldson
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 27, 19961997 Robert J. Cruikshank
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Cruikshank
Director
Date: March 27, 19961997 Charles E. Hurwitz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles E. Hurwitz
Director
Date: March 27, 19961997 Ezra G. Levin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezra G. Levin
Director
Date: March 27, 19961997 Robert Marcus
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Marcus
Director
Date: March 27, 19961997 Robert J. Petris
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Petris
Director
2422
26
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ ------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
(the "Company" or "KAC"), dated February 21, 1991 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, dated June 11, 1991, filed by KAC, Registration
No. 33-37895).
3.2 Certificate of Retirement of KAC, dated October 24, 1995 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
*3.3 Amended and Restated By-laws of KAC, dated February 3, 1997.
4.1 Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993, among Kaiser Aluminum &
Chemical Corporation ("KACC"), as Issuer, Kaiser Alumina Australia
Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., and Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, as
Subsidiary Guarantors, and The First National Bank of Boston, as
Trustee, regarding KACC's 12 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 1992, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 1993, to the
Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 1993, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605).
4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1996, to the
Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
*3.2 Certificate of Retirement of KAC, dated October 24, 1995.
3.3 By-laws of KAC, amended as of February 26, 1991 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, dated June 11, 1991, filed by KAC,
Registration No. 33-37895).
4.1 Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993, among KACC, as Issuer,
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., and
Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The
First National Bank of Boston, as Trustee, regarding KACC's
12-3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1992, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605).
4.2 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 1993, to the
Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KACC,
File No. 1-3605).
*4.3 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1996, to
the Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1993.
4.4 Indenture, dated as of February 17, 1994, among KACC, as Issuer,
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc.,
Kaiser Jamaica Corporation, and Kaiser Finance Corporation, as
Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as
Trustee, regarding KACC's 9-7/8% Senior Notes Due 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Report on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993, filed by KAC, File
No. 1-9447).
*4.5 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1996, to
the Indenture, dated as of February 17, 1994.
4.6 Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 1994, among KACC, as Issuer,
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser
Jamaica Corporation, and Kaiser Finance Corporation, as Subsidiary
Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as Trustee,
regarding KACC's 97/8% Senior Notes Due 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 1993, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.5 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1996, to the
Indenture, dated as of February 17, 1994 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.6 Indenture, dated as of October 23, 1996, among KACC, as Issuer, Kaiser
Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser Jamaica
Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill Holdings,
LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill Holdings,
LLC and Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, as Subsidiary Guarantors,
and First Trust National Association, as Trustee, regarding KACC's
107/8% Senior Notes Due 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 1996, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.7 Indenture, dated as of December 23, 1996, among KACC, as Issuer,
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation, Alpart Jamaica Inc., Kaiser
Jamaica Corporation, Kaiser Finance Corporation, Kaiser Micromill
Holdings, LLC, Kaiser Sierra Micromills, LLC, Kaiser Texas Micromill
Holdings, LLC, and Kaiser Texas Sierra Micromills, LLC, as Subsidiary
Guarantors, and First Trust National Association, as Trustee,
regarding the Company's 10 7/8% Series C Senior Notes due 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-4, dated January 2, 1997, filed by KACC,
Registration No. 333-19143).
4.8 Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, among KAC, KACC, the
financial institutions a party thereto, and BankAmerica Business
Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993, filed
by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.7 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 1994,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 1994,
among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions party thereto, and
BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 1994, filed by KAC, File
No. 1-9447).
4.8 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 10, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions party
thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Report on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 1994, filed by KAC, File
No. 1-9447).
25
23
27
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ----------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ ------------
4.9 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party
thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1995, filed by KAC,
File No. 1-9447).
4.10 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17,
1995, amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17,
1994, as amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a
party thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995, filed by
KAC, File No. 1-9447).
*4.11 Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11,
1995, amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 17,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
4.9 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 21, 1994,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, among
KAC, KACC, the financial institutions party thereto, and BankAmerica
Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
1994, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.10 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 10, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 1994, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.11 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.12 Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.13 Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1995,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.14 Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1996,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1996, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.15 Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 17, 1996,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KAC, KACC, the financial institutions a party thereto,
and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4,
dated January 2, 1997, filed by KACC, Registration No. 333-19143).
*4.16 Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 24, 1997,
amending the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 15, 1994, as
amended, among KACC, Kaiser, the financial institutions a party
thereto, and BankAmerica Business Credit, Inc., as Agent.
4.12 Certificate of Designations of Series A Mandatory Conversion
Premium Dividend Preferred Stock of KAC, dated June 28, 1993
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KAC,
File No. 1-9447).
4.13 Deposit Agreement between KAC and The First National Bank of
Boston, dated as of June 30, 1993 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 1993, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.14 Intercompany Note between KAC and KACC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-1, dated December 13, 1989, filed by KACC, Registration
No. 33-30645).
4.15 Senior Subordinated Intercompany Note between KACC and a
subsidiary of MAXXAM, dated December 15, 1992 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1994, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.16 Certificate of Designations of 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible
Preferred Stock of KAC, dated February 17, 1994 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.21 to the Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1993, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.17 Intercompany Note between KAC and KACC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1996, filed by MAXXAM Inc. ("MAXXAM"), File No. 1-3924).
4.18 Confirmation of Amendment of Non-Negotiable Intercompany Note, dated
as of October 6, 1993, between KAC and KACC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1996, filed by MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
4.19 Certificate of Designations of 8.255% PRIDES, Convertible Preferred
Stock of KAC, dated February 17, 1994 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.21 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 1993, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.20 Senior Subordinated Intercompany Note between KAC and KACC dated
February 15, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993, filed by
KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.18
24
28
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
4.21 Senior Subordinated Intercompany Note between KAC and KACC dated March
17, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993, filed by KAC, File
No. 1-9447).
KAC has not filed certain long-term debt instruments not being
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission where the total
amount of indebtedness authorized under any such instrument does not
exceed 10% of the total assets of KAC and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. KAC agrees and undertakes to furnish a copy of any
such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its
request.
10.1 Form of indemnification agreement with officers and directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Registration
Statement of KAC on Form S-4, File No. 33-12836).
10.2 Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of December 21, 1989, between
MAXXAM and KACC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated
December 14, 1989, filed by KACC, Registration No. 33-30645).
10.3 Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of February 26, 1991, between
KAC and MAXXAM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated
June 11, 1991, filed by KAC, Registration No. 33-37895).
10.4 Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1993, between KACC and
KAC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KACC, File
No. 1-3605).
10.5 Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1993, between KAC and MAXXAM
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KACC, File No.
1-3605).
Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements
[Exhibits 10.6 - 10.16, inclusive]
10.6 KACC's Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated
December 14, 1989, filed by KACC, Registration No. 33-30645).
10.7 Kaiser 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 1993, filed by KACC, File No. 1-3605).
10.8 Kaiser 1995 Employee Incentive Compensation Program (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.9 Kaiser 1995 Executive Incentive Compensation Program (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99 to the Proxy Statement, dated April 26, 1995,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.10 Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 1993, among KAC, KACC, and George
T. Haymaker, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1993,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.11 First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between KACC, KAC and
George T. Haymaker, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to
the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
4.19 Senior Subordinated Intercompany Note between KAC and KACC dated
June 30, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
26
25
29
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ -----------
10.12 Promissory Note, dated February 1, 1989, by Anthony R. Pierno and
Beverly J. Pierno to MAXXAM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.30 to Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1988, filed by
MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.13 Promissory Note, dated July 19, 1990, by Anthony R. Pierno to MAXXAM
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1990, filed by MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.14 Promissory Note, dated July 20, 1993, between MAXXAM and Byron L. Wade
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 1993, filed by MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.15 Letter Agreement, dated January 1995, between KAC and Charles E.
Hurwitz, granting Mr. Hurwitz stock options under the Kaiser 1993
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
1994, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.16 Form of letter agreement with persons granted stock options under the
Kaiser 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to acquire shares of KAC
common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1994, filed by KAC,
File No. 1-9447).
*11 Computation of Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share
*13 The portions of KAC's Annual Report to shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 1996, which are incorporated by reference into this
Report.
*21 Significant Subsidiaries of KAC.
*23.1 Consent of Independent Public Accountants.
*23.2 Consent of Wharton Levin Ehrmantraut Klein & Nash, P.A.
*23.3 Consent of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges LLP.
*27 Financial Data Schedule.
- ------ ------------
KAC has not filed certain long-term debt instruments not being
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission where the
total amount of indebtedness authorized under any such
instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of KAC and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. KAC agrees and undertakes
to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon its request.
10.1 Form of indemnification agreement with officers and directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Registration
Statement of KAC on Form S-4, File No. 33-12836).
10.2 Tax Allocation Agreement between MAXXAM and KACC (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Amendment No. 6 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, dated December 14, 1989, filed by KACC,
Registration No. 33-30645).
10.3 Tax Allocation Agreement between KAC and MAXXAM (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1, dated June 11, 1991, filed by KAC,
Registration No. 33-37895).
10.4 Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of June----------
* Filed herewith
26
30 1993, between KACC
and KAC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed
by KACC, File No. 1-3605).
10.5 Assumption Agreement, dated as of October 28, 1988 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit HHH to the Final Amendment to the
Schedule 13D of MAXXAM Group Inc. and others in respect of the
Common Stock of KAC, par value $.33-1/3 per share).
10.6 Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1993, between KAC and MAXXAM
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KACC,
File No. 1-3605).
Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements
[Exhibits 10.7 - 10.20, inclusive]
10.7 KACC's Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to
Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, dated
December 14, 1989, filed by KACC, Registration No. 33-30645).
10.8 Kaiser 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 1993, filed by KACC, File
No. 1-3605).
10.9 Kaiser 1995 Employee Incentive Compensation Program (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 1995, filed by KAC, File
No. 1-9447).
10.10 Kaiser 1995 Executive Incentive Compensation Program
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Proxy Statement,
dated April 26, 1995, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.11 Employment Agreement, dated April 1, 1993, among KAC, KACC, and
George T. Haymaker, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 1993, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
27
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ----------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------ ------------
10.12 Promissory Note, dated October 4, 1990, by Robert W. Irelan and
Barbara M. Irelan to KACC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.54 to Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1990, filed
by MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.13 Promissory Note, dated February 1, 1989, by Anthony R. Pierno and
Beverly J. Pierno to MAXXAM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.30 to Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1988, filed
by MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.14 Promissory Note, dated July 19, 1990, by Anthony R. Pierno to
MAXXAM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 1990, filed by MAXXAM, File No.
1-3924).
10.15 Promissory Note, dated July 20, 1993, between MAXXAM and Byron L.
Wade (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 1993, filed by MAXXAM,
File No. 1-3924).
10.16 Employment Agreement, dated August 20, 1993, between KACC and
Robert E. Cole (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1993, filed by
MAXXAM, File No. 1-3924).
10.17 Compensation Agreement, dated July 18, 1994, between KACC and
Larry L. Watts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1994,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.18 Compensation Agreement, dated July 18, 1994, between KACC and
Geoff S. Smith (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1994,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.19 Letter Agreement, dated January 1995, between KAC and Charles E.
Hurwitz, granting Mr. Hurwitz stock options under the Kaiser
1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 1994, filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
10.20 Form of letter agreement with persons granted stock options under
the Kaiser 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to acquire shares of
KAC common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1994,
filed by KAC, File No. 1-9447).
*11 Computation of Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share.
*13 The portions of KAC's Annual Report to shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 1995, which are incorporated by reference into
this Report.
*21 Significant Subsidiaries of KAC.
*27 Financial Data Schedule.
__________
* Filed herewith
28
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES
------------
Listed below are the principal subsidiaries of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation, the
jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization and the names under which
such subsidiaries do business. Certain subsidiaries are omitted which,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary.
Place of
Incorporation
Name or Organization
----- ---------------
Alpart Jamaica Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware
Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership). . Delaware
Anglesey Aluminium Limited . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation . . . . Delaware
Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc. . . . . Delaware
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation . . . Delaware
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited Ontario
Kaiser Bauxite Company . . . . . . . . . . . Nevada
Kaiser Finance Corporation . . . . . . . . . Delaware
Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership) Jamaica
Kaiser Jamaica Corporation . . . . . . . . . Delaware
Queensland Alumina Limited . . . . . . . . . Queensland
Volta Aluminium Company Limited. . . . . . .
Place of
Incorporation
Name or Organization
---- ---------------
Alpart Jamaica Inc. ................................... Delaware
Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership).............. Delaware
Anglesey Aluminium Limited............................. United Kingdom
Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation................... Delaware
Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc.................... Delaware
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation................. Delaware
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited........... Ontario
Kaiser Bauxite Company................................. Nevada
Kaiser Finance Corporation ............................ Delaware
Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership)........... Jamaica
Kaiser Jamaica Corporation............................. Delaware
Queensland Alumina Limited............................. Queensland
Volta Aluminium Company Limited........................ Ghana
29
27
31
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domestic California Pennsylvania
---------- ------------
Operations Los Angeles (City of Commerce) Erie
(Partial List) ExtrudedEngineered Products Forgings Plant and OfficesEngineered Products
Los Angeles (Santa Fe Springs) South Carolina
--------------
ExtrudedEngineered Products Fabricating Greenwood
Oxnard Forgings
ForgingsEngineered Products
Engineered Products Greenwood
Pleasanton Engineered Products Machine Shop
R&D at the Center for Technology, Tennessee
----------
Administrative Offices Jackson
Florida ExtrudedEngineered Products
--------
Mulberry Texas
------
Sodium Silicofluoride, Potassium Silicofluoride DallasHouston
Louisiana Extruded Products Offices
----------
Baton Rouge Houston
Alumina, Kaiser Alumina
Technical Services, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation Headquarters
International Business
Development, andBaton Rouge Sherman
Alumina, Environmental Offices ExtrudedEngineered Products
Gramercy Washington
-----------
Alumina Mead
Michigan Primary Aluminum,
---------
Detroit (Southfield) Division Technology Center
Automotive Product Development and Sales Richland
Ohio ExtrudedEngineered Products
-----
Canton Tacoma
CastingsEngineered Products Primary Aluminum
Newark Trentwood
ExtrudedEngineered Products Flat-Rolled Products
Plant and Offices
Oklahoma
---------
Tulsa
Aluminum and Magnesium
Extruded Products; AnodesEngineered Products
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worldwide Australia Japan
---------- ------
Operations Queensland Alumina Limited (28.3% owned) Furukawa Kaiser Forged Products Company
(Partial List) Alumina (47.5%)
Canada Sales Office
-------
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited The Netherlands
----------------Russia
(100%) Kaiser Aluminum Mill Products Inc. (100%)
Extruded Products Sales Office
Ghana Russia
------ -------
Volta Aluminium Company Limited (90%) Kaiser Aluminium Russia, Inc. (100%)
Primary AluminumEngineered Products International Business Development
JamaicaGhana Wales, United Kingdom
-------- --------------------------- ---------------------
Volta Aluminium Company Limited (90%) Anglesey Aluminium Limited (49%)
Primary Aluminum Primary Aluminum
Jamaica
Alumina Partners of Jamaica (65%)
Anglesey Aluminium Limited (49%)
Bauxite, Alumina Primary Aluminum
Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (49%)
Bauxite
30
28