UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132016
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-9804 

PULTEGROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
MICHIGAN 38-2766606
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
100 Bloomfield Hills Parkway,3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 300150
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 647-2750(404) 978-6400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock,Shares, par value $0.01New York Stock Exchange
PulteGroup, Inc. 7.375% Senior Notes due 2046 New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   YES [ ]  NO  [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Act.  YES  [X]  NO  [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [X]            Accelerated filer [ ]             Non-accelerated filer [ ]            Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  YES [ ]  NO  [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stockshares held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20132016, based on the closing sale price per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was $7,299,008,8716,626,321,236.
As of February 1, 2014January 26, 2017, the registrant had 381,299,600317,833,859 shares of common stockshares outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Applicable portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form.




PULTEGROUP, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Item
No.
 
Page
No.
 
Page
No.
  
  
1
  
1A
  
1B
  
2
  
3
  
4
  
4A
  
  
  
5
  
6
  
7
  
7A
  
8
  
9
  
9A
  
9B
  
  
  
10
  
11
  
12
  
13
  
14
  
  
  
15
  
 


2




PART I

ITEM I.    BUSINESS

PulteGroup, Inc.

PulteGroup, Inc. is a Michigan corporation organized in 1956. We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States ("U.S."), and our common stock tradesshares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “PHM”. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "PulteGroup", the "Company", "we", "us", and "our" used herein refer to PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries. While our subsidiaries engage primarily in the homebuilding business, we also have mortgage banking operations, conducted principally through Pulte Mortgage LLC (“Pulte Mortgage”), and title operations.

Homebuilding, our core business, includes the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes within the U.S. and the construction of housing on such land. Homebuilding offersWe offer a broad product line to meet the needs of home buyershomebuyers in our targeted markets. Through our brands, which include Centex, Pulte Homes, Del Webb, DiVosta Homes, and Centex (acquired through our merger with Centex Corporation ("Centex") in 2009),John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, we offer a wide variety of home designs, including single-family detached, townhouses, condominiums, and duplexes at different prices and with varying levels of options and amenities to our major customer groups: entry-level,first-time, move-up, and active adult. Over our history, we have delivered over 625,000nearly 680,000 homes.

As of December 31, 20132016, we conducted our operations in 4849 markets located throughout 2725 states. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:
 
Northeast: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West: Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern CaliforniaWashington

We also have a reportable segment for our financial services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. Our Financial Services segment operates generally in the same geographic markets as our Homebuilding segments.

Financial information for each of our reportable business segments is included in Note 54 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Available information

Our internet website address is www.pultegroupinc.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our code of ethics for principal officers, our code of ethical business conduct, our corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Governance, and Finance and Investment committeesCommittees of our Board of Directors are also posted on our website and are available in print, free of charge, upon request.


3




Homebuilding Operations

Years Ended December 31,
($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
($000’s omitted)
2013 2012 2011 2010 20092016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
Home sale revenues$5,424,309
 $4,552,412
 $3,950,743
 $4,419,812
 $3,869,297
$7,451,315
 $5,792,675
 $5,662,171
 $5,424,309
 $4,552,412
 
Home closings17,766
 16,505
 15,275
 17,095
 15,013
19,951
 17,127
 17,196
 17,766
 16,505
 

Beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2011, the U.S. housing market experienced a significant decline in the demand for new homes as well as a sharp decline in overall residential real estate values. U.S. new homeAfter several years of declining sales in 2011 were the lowest since 1962. As a result of this industry-wide downturn, we suffered net losses in each year between 2007 - 2011 from a combination of reduced operational profitability and significant asset impairments. In response to these market conditions, we restructured our operations, including making significant reductions in employee headcount and overhead costs, and managed our business to generate cash, including curtailing our investments in inventory. We used this positive cash flow to, among other things, increase our cash reserves as well as retire outstanding debt.

In 2012,volume, new home sales in the U.S. increased in 2012 for the first time since 2005. In 2013, this2005, beginning a multi-year recovery in demand. This trend continued in 2016 as new home sales in the U.S. rose 16%12% to approximately 428,000563,000 homes, an approximate 40%84% increase from 2011, the bottom of the most recent housing cycle in 2011.downturn. Additionally, mortgage interest rates remain near historic lows and the overall inventory of homes available for sale, especially new homes, remains low. Although current industry volume remains low compared with historical levels, the improved environment and the actions we have taken contributed to our return to profitability in 2012 and a significant increaseincreases in our profitabilityincome before income taxes each year in 2013.the period 2013 - 2016. In the long term, we continue to believe that the national publicly-traded builders will have a competitive advantage over local builders through their ability to leverage economies of scale, access to more reliable and lower cost financing through the capital markets, ability to control and entitle large land positions, and greater geographic and product diversification. Among theour national publicly-traded peer group, we believe that builders with broad geographic and product diversity and sustainable capital positions will benefit as market conditions continue to recover. In the short-term, we expect that overall market conditions will continue to improve but that improvements will occur unevenly across our markets. Our strategy to enhance shareholder value is centered around the following operational objectives:

Improving our inventory turns;
More effectivelyEffectively allocating the capital we invest in our business using a risk-based portfolio approach;
Maximizing our inventory turns while maintaining an adequate supply of house and land inventory;
Enhancing revenues by: establishing clear product offerings for each of our brandsconsumer groups based on systematic, consumer-driven input, optimizing our pricing through the expanded use of options and lot premiums, and lesseninglimiting our reliance on speculative home sales;
ReducingOptimizing our house costs through common house plan management, value-engineering our house plans, and working with suppliers to reduce costs; and
Maintaining an efficient overhead structure.

Our Homebuilding operations are geographically diverse within the U.S. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had 577726 active communities.communities spanning 49 markets across 25 states. Sales prices of unit closings during 20132016 ranged from less than $100,000approximately $100,000 to greater than $1,200,000,over $1,000,000, with 86%80% falling within the range of $100,000$150,000 to $450,000.$500,000. The average unit selling price in 20132016 was $305,000,$373,000, compared with $276,000$338,000 in 2012, $259,0002015, $329,000 in 2011, $259,0002014, $305,000 in 2010,2013, and $258,000$276,000 in 2009.2012. The increase in average selling price in recent years resulted from a number of factors, including improved market conditions and a shift in our sales mix toward move-up and active adult homebuyers. Our average unit selling price in 2016 was also impacted by our acquisition in January 2016 of substantially all of the assets of JW Homes ("Wieland), which are geared toward move-up buyers.

Sales of single-family detached homes, as a percentage of total unit sales, were 87% in 2016, compared with 86% in 2015, 86% in 2014, 85% in 2013, compared withand 81% in 2012, 79% in 2011, 79% in 2010, and 77% in 2009. The increase in the percentage of single-family detached homes can be attributed to a weakened demand for townhouses, condominiums, and other attached housing, as prices forshift in our business toward the move-up buyer, who tends to prefer detached new homes have become more affordable for entry-level and active adult homebuyers.homes.


4



Ending backlog, which represents orders for homes that have not yet closed, was $2.9 billion (7,422 units) at December 31, 2016 and $1.92.5 billion (5,7726,731 units) at December 31, 2013 and $1.9 billion (6,458 units) at December 31, 20122015. For each orderorders in backlog, we have received a signed customer contract and customer deposit, which is refundable in certain instances. Of the orders in backlog at December 31, 20132016, substantially all are scheduled to be closed during 20142017, though all orders are subject to potential cancellation by or final negotiations with the customer. In the event of cancellation, the majority of our sales contracts stipulate that we have the right to retain the customer’s deposit, though we may choose to refund the deposit in certain instances.



Land acquisition and development

We acquire land primarily for the construction of homes for sale to homebuyers. We select locations for development of homebuilding communities after completing a feasibility study, which includes, among other things, soil tests, independent environmental studies and other engineering work, an evaluation of necessary zoning and other governmental entitlements, and extensive market research that enables us to match the location with our product offering to targeted consumer groups.meet the needs of consumers. We consider factors such as proximity to developed areas, population and job growth patterns, and, if applicable, estimated development costs. We frequently manage a portion of the risk of controlling our land positions through the use of land option contracts, which enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by land sellers until we have determined whether and when to exercise our option. Our use of land option agreements reduces ourthe financial risksrisk associated with long-term land holdings. We typically acquire land with the intent to complete sales of housing units within 24 to 36 months from the date of opening a community, except in the case of certain Del Webb active adult developments and other large master-planned projects for which the completion of community build-out requires a longer time period. While our overall supply of controlled land is in excess of our short-term needs in many of our markets, some of our controlled land consists of long-term positions that will not be converted to home sales in the near term. Accordingly, we remain active in our pursuit of new land investment. We may also periodically sell select parcels of land to third parties for commercial or other development. Additionally,development if we may determine that certain land assets no longerthey do not fit into our strategic operating plans.

Land is generally purchased after it is properly zoned and developed, or is ready for development.development for our intended use. In the normal course of business, we dispose of ownedperiodically sell land not required by our homebuilding operations through sales to appropriate end users.operations. Where we develop land, we engage directly in many phases of the development process, including: land and site planning; obtaining environmental and other regulatory approvals; and constructing roads, sewers, water and drainage facilities, and community amenities, such as parks, pools, and clubhouses. We use our staff and the services of independent engineers and consultants for land development activities. Land development work is performed primarily by independent contractors and, when needed, local government authorities who construct sewer and water systems in some areas. At December 31, 2013,2016, we controlled 123,478143,258 lots, of which 95,21299,279 were owned and 28,26643,979 were under land option agreements.

Sales and marketing

We are dedicated to improving the quality and value of our homes through innovative architectural and community designs. Analyzing various qualitative and quantitative data obtained through extensive market research, we stratify our potential customers into well-defined buyer groups. Such stratification provides a method for understanding the business opportunities and risks across the full spectrum of consumer groups in each market. Once the demandsneeds of potential buyers are understood, we link our home design and community development efforts to the specific lifestyle of each targeted consumer group. Through our portfoliounderstanding of brands, each serving unique consumer groups,group, we are able to provide a distinct experience to potential customers:homes that better meet the needs and wants of each buyer.
 CentexPulte HomesDel Webb
Targeted consumer groupEntry-level buyersMove-up buyersActive adults
Portion of 2013 home closings25%46%29%
 First-TimeMove-UpActive Adult
Portion of home closings:   
201629%43%28%
201241%32%27%

The move-upOur homes targeted to first-time buyers in our Pulte Homes communitiestend to be smaller with product offerings geared toward lower average selling prices or higher density. Move-up buyers tend to place more of a premium on location and amenities. These communities typically offer larger homes at higher price points. Our Centex brand is targeted to entry-level buyers, and these homes tend to be smaller with product offerings geared toward lower average selling prices. Through our Del Webb brand, we are better able to address the needs of active adults. Our Del Webb brand offersadults, to whom we offer both destination communities and “in place” communities, for those buyers who prefer to remain in their current geographic area. TheseMany of these communities are highly amenitized, communities offeroffering a variety of features, including golf courses, recreational centers, and educational classes, to the age fifty-five and over buyer to maintain an active lifestyle. In order to make the cost of these highly amenitized communities affordable to the individual homeowner, Del Webb communities tend to be larger than entry-levelfirst-time or move-up buyer communities. As illustrated in the above table, our sales mix has shifted in recent years toward the move-up buyer where demand has been stronger. This shift in U.S. housing demand has occurred primarily due to financial challenges facing the first-time buyer, including a recovering U.S. economy, the overhang of consumer debt, especially student loans related to higher education, and a more restrictive mortgage lending environment.


5




We market our homes to prospective buyers through media advertising, illustrated brochures, Internetinternet listings and link placements, mobile applications, media advertising, illustrated brochures, and other advertising displays. We have made significant enhancements in our tools and business practices to adapt our selling efforts to today's mobiletech-enabled customers. In addition, our websites (www.centex.com, www.pulte.com, www.delwebb.com,www.divosta.com, and www.centex.com,www.jwhomes.com) provide tools to help users find a home that meets their needs, investigate financing alternatives, communicate moving plans, maintain a home, learn more about us, and communicate directly with us. There were approximately 9.210.4 million unique visits to our websites during 20132016, compared with approximately 8.09.6 million in 2012.2015.

To meet the demands of our various customers, we have established design expertise for a wide array of product lines. We believe that we are an innovator in consumer-inspired home design, and we view our design capabilities as an integral aspect of our marketing strategy. Our in-house architectural services teams and management, supplemented by outside consultants, createfollow a 12-step product development process to introduce new features and technologies based on customer-validated data. Following this disciplined process results in distinctive design features, both in exterior facades and interior options and features. We typically offer a variety of potential options and upgrades, such as different flooring, countertop, and appliance choices, and design our base house and option packages to meet the needs of our customers as defined through rigorous market research. Energy efficiency represents an important source of value for new homes compared with existing homes and represents a key area of focus for our home designs, including high efficiency HVACheating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems and insulation, low-emissivity windows, solar power in certain geographies, and other energy-efficient features.

Typically, our sales teams, in some cases together with outside sales brokers, are responsible for guiding the customer through the sales process. We are committed to industry-leading customer service through a variety of quality initiatives, including our customer care program, which ensuresseeks to ensure that homeowners are comfortable at every stage of the building process. Fully furnished and landscaped model homes physically located in our communities, which leverage the expertise of our interior designers, are generally used to showcase our homes and their distinctive design features.

Construction

The construction of our homes is conducted under the supervision of our on-site construction field managers. Substantially all of our construction work is performed by independent subcontractors under contracts that in many instances,generally cover both labor and materials on a fixed-price basis. Using a selective process, we have teamed up with what we believe are premier subcontractors and suppliers to deliver all aspects of the house construction process.

Continuous improvement in our house construction process is a key area of focus. We seek to maintain efficient construction operations by using standard materials and components from a variety of sources and by utilizing standard construction practices. Beginning in 2011, we implemented an intensive effort to improveWe are improving our product offerings and production processes through the following programs:

A 12-step product development process to introduce new features and technologies based on customer-validated data;
Common management of house plans in order to focus on building those house designs that customers value the most and that can be built at the highest quality and at an efficient cost;
Value engineering our house plans to optimize house designs in terms of material content and ease of construction while still providing a clear value to the customer (value engineering eliminates items that add cost but that have little to no value to the customer);
Improving our usage of Pulte Construction Standards, a proprietary system of internally required construction practices, through development of new or revised standards, training of our field leadership and construction personnel, communication with our suppliers, and auditing our compliance; and
Working with our suppliers to establish the "should cost", a data driven, collaborative effort to reduce construction costs to what the associated construction activities or materials “should cost” in the market.

The availability ofability to consistently source qualified labor and materials at reasonable prices is becoming an increasing concern for certain trades and building materials in some marketshas become more challenging as thelabor supply chain responds to uneven industry growth.growth has not kept pace with construction demand. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in global commodity prices. To minimize the effects ofprotect against changes in construction costs, the contracting and purchasing of building supplies and materials generally is negotiated at or near the time when related sales contracts are signed with customers. In addition, we leverage our size by actively negotiating for certain materials on a national or regional basis to minimize production component cost.costs. We are also working to establish a more integrated system that can effectively link suppliers, contractors, and the production schedule. However, we cannot determine the extent to which necessary building materials and labor will be available at reasonable prices in the future.


6




Competition

The housing industry in the U.S. is fragmented and highly competitive. While we are one of the largest homebuilders in the U.S., our national market share represented only approximately 4% of U.S. new home sales in 20132016. In each of our local markets, there are numerous national, regional, and local homebuilders with whom we compete. Additionally, new home sales have traditionally represented less than 15% of overall U.S. home sales (new and existing homes). Therefore, we also compete with sales of existing house inventory and any provider of housing units, for sale or to rent,rental housing units, including apartment operators, may be considered a competitor. Conversion of apartments to condominiums further provides an alternative to traditional housing, as does manufactured housing.operators. We compete primarily on the basis of location, price, quality, reputation, design, community amenities, and our customers' overall sales and homeownership experiences.

Seasonality

OurAlthough significant changes in market conditions have impacted our seasonal patterns in the past and could do so again, we historically experience variability in our quarterly results from operations due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding operating cycle historically reflected increasedindustry. We generally experience increases in revenues profitability, and cash flow from operations during the fourth quarter based on the timing of home closings. WhileThis seasonal activity increases our working capital requirements in our third and fourth quarters to support our home production and loan origination volumes. As a result of the challenging market conditions experienced in recent years lessened the seasonal variationsseasonality of our operations, our quarterly results we have experienced a return to a more traditional demand pattern as new orders were higher in the first halfof operations are not necessarily indicative of the year and home closings increased in each quarter throughoutresults that may be expected for the full year. If and when the homebuilding industry more fully recovers from the recent downturn, we believe these traditional seasonal patterns will continue.

Regulation and environmental matters

Our operations are subject to extensive regulations imposed and enforced by various federal, state, and local governing authorities. These regulations are complex and include building codes, land zoning and other entitlement restrictions, health and safety regulations, labor practices, marketing and sales practices, environmental regulations, rules and regulations relating to mortgage financing and title operations, and various other laws, rules, and regulations. Collectively, these regulations have a significant impact on the site selection and development of our communities, our house design and construction techniques, our relationships with customers, employees, and suppliers / subcontractors, and many other aspects of our business. The applicable governing authorities frequently have broad discretion in administering these regulations, including inspections of our homes prior to closing with the customer in the majority of municipalities in which we operate.

Financial Services Operations

We conduct our financial services business, which includes mortgage and title operations, through Pulte Mortgage and other subsidiaries. Pulte Mortgage arranges financing through the origination of mortgage loans primarily for the benefit of our homebuyers. We are a lender approved by the FHAFederal Housing Administration ("FHA") and VADepartment of Veterans Affairs ("VA") and are a seller/servicer approved by Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae"), Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), and other investors. In our conventional mortgage lending activities, we follow underwriting guidelines established by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and private investors. We believe that our customers’ use of our in-house mortgage and title operations provides us with a competitive advantage by enabling more control over the quality of the overall home buying process for our customers, while also helping us align the timing of the house construction process with our customers’ financing needs.

Operating as a captive business model primarily targeted to supporting our Homebuilding operations, the business levels of our Financial Services operations are highly correlated to Homebuilding. During 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, we originated mortgage loans for 64%65%, 67%65%, and 61%, respectively, of the homes we sold. Such originations represented substantially all of our total originations in each of those years. Our capture rate, which we define as loan originations from our homebuilding business as a percentage of total loan opportunities from our homebuilding business excluding cash settlements, was 81.2% in 2016, 82.9% in 2015, and 80.2% in 2013, 81.9% in 2012, and 78.5% in 20112014.

In originating mortgage loans, we initially use our own funds, including funds available pursuant to credit agreements with third parties, and subsequently sell such mortgage loans to third party investors in the secondary market. Substantially all of the loans we originate are sold in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination, generally within 30 days. We also sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the loans and related servicing rights for only a short period of time.


7




The mortgage industry in the U.S. is highly competitive. We compete with other mortgage companies and financial institutions to provide attractive mortgage financing to our homebuyers. We utilize a centralized fulfillment center staffed with loan consultants to performfor our mortgage operations that performs underwriting, processing, and closing functions. We believe centralizing both the fulfillment and origination of our loans improves the speed, efficiency, and quality of our mortgage operations, improving our profitability and allowing us to focus on providing attractive mortgage financing opportunities for our customers.

In originating and servicing mortgage loans, we are subject to the rules and regulations of the government-sponsored investors and other investors that purchase the loans we originate, as well as to those of other government agencies that have oversight of the government-sponsored investors or consumer lending rules in the U.S. In addition to being affected by changes in these programs, our mortgage banking business is also affected by many of the same factors that impact our homebuilding business.

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans met certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be faulty, we either repurchase the loan from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a "make-whole" payment). Historically, our overall losses related to this risk were not significant. Beginning in 2009, however, we experienced a significant increase in losses as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. Given the volatility in the mortgage industry and the uncertainty regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, actual costs could differ from our current estimates.

Our subsidiary title insurance companies serve as title insurance agents and underwriters in select markets by providing title insurance policies and examination and closing services to buyers of homes we sell. Historically, we have not experienced significant claims related to our title operations.

Financial Information About Geographic Areas

Substantially all of our operations are located within the U.S. However, weWe have some non-operating foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, which are insignificant to our consolidated financial results.

Organization/Employees

All subsidiaries and operating units operate independently with respect to daily operations. Homebuilding real estate purchases and other significant homebuilding, mortgage banking, financing activities, and similar operating decisions must be approved by the business unit’s management and/or corporate senior management.

At December 31, 20132016, we employed 3,8434,623 people, of which 709829 people were employed in our Financial Services operations. Except for a small group of employees in our St. Louis homebuilding division, our employees are not represented by any union. Contracted work, however, may be performed by union contractors. Our local and corporate management personnel are paid incentive compensation based on a combination of individual performance and the performance of the applicable business unit or the Company. Each business unit is given a level of autonomy regarding employment of personnel, althoughsubject to adherence to our established policies and procedures, and our senior corporate management acts in an advisory capacity in the employment of subsidiary officers. We consider our employee and contractor relations to be satisfactory.


8




ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS

Discussion of our business and operations included in this annual report on Form 10-K should be read together with the risk factors set forth below. They describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are, or may become, subject. These risks and uncertainties, together with other factors described elsewhere in this report, have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies, or prospects in a material and adverse manner.

DownwardThe homebuilding industry is cyclical and a deterioration in industry conditions or downward changes in general economic real estate construction, or other business conditions could adversely affect our business or our financial results.

The residential homebuilding industry is sensitive to changes in economic conditions and other factors, such as the level of employment, consumer confidence, consumer income, availability of financing, and interest rate levels. Adverse changes in any of these conditions generally, or in the markets where we operate, could decrease demand and pricing for new homes in these areas or result in customer cancellations of pending contracts, which could adversely affect the number of home deliveries we make or reduce the prices we can charge for homes, either of which could result in a decrease in our revenues and earnings and wouldthat could adversely affect our financial condition.

The homebuilding industry experienced a significant downturn in recent years. Although industry conditions improved during 2012 and 2013, the overall U.S. economy, while improving, remains challenged and consumer demand in the industry remains volatile. A deterioration in industry conditions could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2011, the U.S. housing market was unfavorably impacted by severe weakness in new home sales attributable to, among other factors, weak consumer confidence, tightened mortgage standards, significant foreclosure activity, a more challenging appraisal environment, higher than normal unemployment levels, and significant uncertainty in the global economy. These conditions contributed to sharply weakened demand for new homes and heightened pricing pressures on new and existing home sales. As a result of these factors,During this period, we experiencedincurred significant decreases in our revenues and profitability during the period 2007 - 2011. We also incurred substantiallosses, including impairments of our land inventory and certain other assets during this period. During 2012 and 2013,assets. Since 2011, overall industry new home sales have increased, and we returned to profitability.profitability beginning in 2012. However, the overall demand for new homes remains below historical levels. Accordingly, we can provide no assurances that the adjustments we have made in our operating strategy will be successful.successful if the current housing market was to deteriorate significantly.

If the market value of our land and homes drops significantly, our profits could decrease.

The market value of land, building lots, and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions, and the measures we employ to manage inventory risk may not be adequate to insulate our operations from a severe drop in inventory values. We acquire land for expansion into new markets and for replacement of land inventory and expansion within our current markets. If housing demand decreases below what we anticipated when we acquired our inventory, we may not be able to make profits similar to what we have made in the past, we may experience less than anticipated profits, and/or we may not be able to recover our costs when we sell and build homes. When market conditions are such that land values are not appreciating, option arrangements previously entered into may become less desirable, at which time we may elect to forego deposits and pre-acquisition costs and terminate the agreement. In the face of adverse market conditions, we may have substantial inventory carrying costs, we may have to write down our inventory to its fair value, and/or we may have to sell land or homes at a loss.

9


Supply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for skilled labor and materials. Labor shortages in certain of our markets have become more acute in recent years as the supply chain adjusts to uneven industry growth. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in local and global commodity prices. Increased costs or shortages of skilled labor and/or materials could cause increases in construction costs and / or construction delays. We may not be able to pass on increases in construction costs to customers and generally are unable to pass on any such increases to customers who have already entered into sales contracts as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the home at the time the contract is signed, which may be well in advance of the construction of the home. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our margins, and pricing competition may restrict our ability to pass on any such additional costs, thereby decreasing our margins.



Our success depends on our ability to acquire land suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices, in accordance with our land investment criteria.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for suitable land. The availability of finished and partially finished developed lots and undeveloped land for purchase that meet our internal criteria depends on a number of factors outside our control, including land availability in general, competition with other homebuilders and land buyers for desirable property, inflation in land prices, zoning, allowable housing density, and other regulatory requirements. Should suitable lots or land become less available, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell could be reduced, and the cost of land could be increased, perhaps substantially, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our long-term ability to build homes depends on our acquiring land suitable for residential building at reasonable prices in locations where we want to build. In the past, we experienced significant competition for suitable land as a result of land constraints in many of our markets. As competition for suitable land increases, and as available land is developed, the cost of acquiring suitable remaining land could rise, and the availability of suitable land at acceptable prices may decline. Any land shortages or any decrease in the supply of suitable land at reasonable prices could limit our ability to develop new communities or result in increased land costs. We may not be able to pass through to our customers any increased land costs, which could adversely impact our revenues, earnings, and margins.

We are subject to claims related to mortgage loans we sold in the secondary mortgage market that may be significant.

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to certain representations and warranties made by us that the loans met certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the type of collateral, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan.  We may also be required to indemnify underwriters that purchased and securitized loans originated by a former subsidiary of Centex for losses incurred by investors in those securitized loans based on similar breaches of representations and warranties.

To date, the significant majority of these losses relate to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the origination market. In 2006We may also be required to indemnify underwriters that purchased and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excludingsecuritized loans originated by Centex'sa former subprime loan business soldsubsidiary of Centex Corporation ("Centex"), which we acquired in 2009, for losses incurred by Centexinvestors in 2006.

In addition, we entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex’s mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor ofthose securitized loans originated by Centex.  This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex’s mortgage operations related tobased on similar breaches of similar representations in the origination of a certain pool of loans.and warranties.

The resolution of claims related to alleged breaches of these representations and warranties and repurchase claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations, and could exceed existing estimates and accruals. The repurchase liability we have recorded is estimated based on several factors, includingoperations. Given the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identifiedongoing volatility in the repurchase requests, and the severitymortgage industry, changes in values of the estimated loss upon repurchase.  The factors referred to above are subject to change in light of market developments, the economic environment,underlying collateral over time, and other circumstances, someuncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of which are beyondthese claims, actual costs could differ from our control.current estimates. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such reserves will not need to be increased in the future.

10



Future increases in interest rates, reductions in mortgage availability, or other increases in the effective costs of owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely affect our business and financial results.

A large majority of our customers finance their home purchases through mortgage loans, many through our mortgage bank. InterestWhile mortgage interest rates have increased moderately, they have been near historical lows for several years, which has made new homes more affordable. Increases in interest rates or decreases in the availability of mortgage financing however, could adversely affect the market for new homes. Potential homebuyers may be less willing or able to pay the increased monthly costs or to obtain mortgage financing. Lenders may increase the qualifications needed for mortgages or adjust their terms to address any increased credit risk. Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in interest rates and mortgage availability could make it harder for them to sell their current homes to potential buyers who need financing. These factors could adversely affect the sales or pricing of our homes and could also reduce the volume or margins in our financial services business. Our financial services business could also be impacted to the extent we are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate through the various hedging strategies we employ. These developments have had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on the overall demand for new housing and thereby on the results of operations for our homebuilding business.

We also believe that the availability of FHA and VA mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing some of our homes. The FHA has and may continue to impose stricter loan qualification standards, raise minimum down payment requirements, impose higher mortgage insurance premiums and other costs, and/or limit the number of mortgages it insures. The liquidity provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the mortgage industry is also critical to the housing market. The impact of the federal government’s conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the short-term and long-term demand for new housing remains unclear. Any limitations or restrictions on the availability of financing by these agencies could adversely affect interest rates, mortgage financing, and our sales of new homes and mortgage loans. Additionally, the availability of FHA and VA mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing some of our homes.

Significant costs of homeownership include mortgage

Mortgage interest expense and real estate taxes represent significant costs of homeownership, both of which are generally deductible for an individual’s federal and, in some cases, state income taxes. Any changes to income tax laws by the federal government or a state government to eliminate or substantially reduce these income tax deductions, as has been considered from time to time, would increase the after-tax cost of owning a home. Increases in real estate taxes by local governmental authorities also increase the cost of homeownership. Any such increases to the cost of homeownership could adversely impact the demand for and sales prices of new homes.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our access to capital and cost of capital.

The capital and credit markets have experiencedcan experience significant volatility in recent years. In many cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on the availability of liquidity and credit capacity for issuers.volatility. We may need credit-related liquidity for the future growth and development of our business.business and other capital needs. Without sufficient liquidity, we may not be able to purchase additional land or develop land, which could adversely affect our financial results. At December 31, 2013,2016, we had cash, cash equivalents, and equivalentsrestricted cash of $1.6 billion$723.2 million as well as restricted cash totaling $72.7$530.9 million. available under our revolving credit facility, net of outstanding letters of credit. However, our internal sources of liquidity and revolving credit facility may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Another source of liquidity includes our ability to use letters of credit and surety bonds pursuant to certain performance-related obligations and as security for certain land option agreements and under various insurance programs. The majority of these letters of credit and surety bonds are in support of our land development and construction obligations to various municipalities, other government agencies, and utility companies related to the construction of roads, sewers, and other infrastructure. At December 31, 20132016, we had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds totaling $183.1$219.1 million and $958.3 million,$1.1 billion, respectively. Of these amounts outstanding, $58.7 million of theThese letters of credit were subject to cash-collateralized agreements while the remaining letters ofare issued via our unsecured revolving credit facility, which contains certain financial covenants and surety bonds were unsecured.other limitations. If we are unable to obtain letters of credit or surety bonds when required, or the conditions imposed by issuers increase significantly, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

11



Competition for homebuyers could reduce our deliveries or decrease our profitability.

The U.S. housing industry in the U.S. is highly competitive. We compete primarily on the basis of location, price, quality, reputation, design, community amenities, and our customers' overall sales and homeownership experiences. We compete in each of our markets with numerous national, regional, and local homebuilders. This competition with other homebuilders could reduce the number of homes we deliver or cause us to accept reduced margins in order to maintain sales volume.

We also compete with resales of existing or foreclosed homes, housing speculators, and available rental housing. Increased competitive conditions in the residential resale or rental market in the regions where we operate could decrease demand for new homes or unfavorably impact pricing for new homes.

Supply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for skilled labor and materials. Additionally, the cost of certain building materials, especially lumber, steel, concrete, copper, and petroleum-based materials, is influenced by changes in global commodity prices. Increased costs or shortages of skilled labor and/or materials could cause increases in construction costs and construction delays. We may not be able to pass on increases in construction costs to customers and generally are unable to pass on any such increases to customers who have already entered into sales contracts as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the home at the time the contract is signed, which may be well in advance of the construction of the home. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our margins, and pricing competition may restrict our ability to pass on any such additional costs, thereby decreasing our margins.

Our income tax provision and tax reserves may be insufficient if a taxing authority is successful in asserting positions that are contrary to our interpretations and related reserves, if any.

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and our reserves for federal, state, and local taxes. In the ordinary course of business, there may be matters for which the ultimate outcome is uncertain. Our evaluation of our tax matters is based on a number of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of audits, and effective settlement of audit issues. Although we believe our approach to determining the tax treatment for such items is appropriate, no assurance can be given that the final tax authority review will not be materially different than that which is reflected in our income tax provision and related tax reserves. Such differences could have a material adverse effect on our income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made and, consequently, on our financial position, cash flows, or net income for such period.income.

We are periodically audited by various federal, state, and local authorities regarding tax matters. Our current audits are in various stages of completion; however, no outcome for a particular audit can be determined with certainty prior to the conclusion of the audit, appeal, and, in some cases, litigation process. As each audit is concluded, adjustments, if any, are recorded in our financial statements in the period determined. To provide for potential tax exposures, we maintain tax reserves based on reasonable estimatesconsider a variety of potentialfactors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlement of audit results.issues. If these reserves are insufficient upon completion of an audit, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position, cash flows, and results of operations.



We may not realize our deferred income tax assets.

As of December 31, 20132016, we had deferred income tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, of $2.2$1.1 billion, against which we provided a valuation allowance of $157.3 million.$64.9 million. The ultimate realization of our deferred income tax assets is dependent upon generating future taxable income and executing tax planning strategies.income. While we have recorded valuation allowances against certain of our deferred income tax assets, the valuation allowances are subject to change as facts and circumstances change.

Our ability to utilize net operating losses (“NOLs”), built-in losses (“BILs”), and tax credit carryforwards to offset our future taxable income or income tax would be limited if we were to undergo an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”). In general, an “ownership change” occurs whenever the percentage of the stock of a corporation owned by “5-percent shareholders” (within the meaning of Section 382 of the IRC) increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of the stock of such corporation owned by such “5-percent shareholders” at any time over the testing period.

12



An ownership change under Section 382 of the IRC would establish an annual limitation to the amount of NOLs, BILs, and tax credit carryforwards we could utilize to offset our taxable income or income tax in any single year. The application of these limitations might prevent full utilization of the deferred tax assets attributable to our NOLs, BILs, and tax credit carryforwards. We have not experienced an ownership change as defined by Section 382. To preserve our ability to utilize NOLs, BILs, and other tax benefits in the future without a Section 382 limitation, we adopted a shareholder rights plan, which is triggered upon certain transfers of our securities, and amended our by-laws to prohibit certain transfers of our securities. Our shareholder rights plan, as amended, expires June 1, 2019, unless our board of directors and shareholders approve an amendment to extend the term prior thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing measures, there can be no assurance that we will not undergo an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382.

As a result of the merger with Centex in August 2009, ourOur ability to use certain of Centex’s pre-ownership change NOLs, BILs,Centex's federal losses and deductionscredits is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The applicable Section 382 limitation is approximately $67.4 million per year for NOLs, losses realized on built-in loss assets that are sold within 60 months of the ownership change (i.e. before August 2014), and certain deductions.IRC. We do not believe that the Section 382 limitationlimitations will prevent the Companyus from using Centex's pre-ownership changeutilizing these Centex losses and credits. We do believe that full utilization of certain state NOL carryforwards and built-in losses or deductions.will be limited due to Section 382.

The value of our deferred tax assets is also dependent upon the tax rates expected to be in effect at the time taxable income is expected to be generated. A decrease in enacted corporate tax rates in our major jurisdictions, especially the U.S. federal corporate tax rate, would decrease the value of our deferred tax assets, which could be material.

We have significant intangible assets. If these assets become impaired, then our profits and shareholders’ equity may be reduced.

We have significant intangible assets related to prior business combinations. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets whenever facts and circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of intangible assets is deemed impaired, the carrying value is written down to fair value. This would result in a charge to our operating earnings. If management’s expectations of future results and cash flows decrease significantly, impairments of the remaining intangible assets may occur.

Government regulations could increase the cost and limit the availability of our development and homebuilding projects or affect our related financial services operations and adversely affect our business or financial results.

Our operations are subject to building, environmental, and other regulations imposed and enforced by various federal, state, and local governing authorities. New housing developments may also be subject to various assessments for schools, parks, streets, and other public improvements. These can cause an increase in the effective cost of our homes.

We also are subject to a variety of local, state, and federal laws and regulations concerning protection of health, safety, and the environment. The impact of environmental laws varies depending upon the prior uses of the building site or adjoining properties and may be greater in areas with less supply where undeveloped land or desirable alternatives are less available. These matters may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. More stringent requirements could be imposed in the future on homebuilders and developers, thereby increasing the cost of compliance.

Our financial services operations are also subject to numerous federal, state, and local laws and regulations. These include eligibility requirements for participation in federal loan programs and compliance with consumer lending and similar requirements such as disclosure requirements, prohibitions against discrimination, and real estate settlement procedures. They also subject our operations to examination by applicable agencies, pursuant to which those agencies may limit our ability to


provide mortgage financing or title services to potential purchasers of our homes. For our homes to qualify for FHA or VA mortgages, we must satisfy valuation standards and site, material, and construction requirements of those agencies.

In January 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau adopted new rules regarding the origination of mortgages, including the criteria for “qualified mortgages”, rules for lender practices regarding assessing borrowers’ ability to repay, and limitations on certain fees and incentive arrangements. Such rules went into effect in January 2014. While we have adjusted our operations to comply with the new rules, the impact such rules will have on our business remains unclear. Additionally, many other rules required by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 have not yet been completed or implemented, which has created uncertainty in the overall U.S. financial services and mortgage industries as to their long-term impact.

13



Homebuilding is subject to warranty and other claims in the ordinary course of business that can be significant.

As a homebuilder, we are subject to home warranty, construction defect, and other claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We record warranty and other reserves for the homes we sell based on historical experience in our markets and our judgment of the qualitative risks associated with the types of homes built. We have, and require our subcontractors to have, general liability, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and available policy limits. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by us. Policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by us. We reserve for costs to cover our self-insured and deductible amounts under these policies and for any costs of claims and lawsuits based on an analysis of our historical claims, which includes an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Because of the uncertainties inherent in these matters, we cannot provide assurance that our insurance coverage, our subcontractor arrangements, and our reserves will be adequate to address all our warranty and construction defect claims in the future. Contractual indemnities can be difficult to enforce, we may be responsible for applicable self-insured retentions, and some types of claims may not be covered by insurance or may exceed applicable coverage limits. Additionally, the coverage offered by and the availability of general liability insurance for construction defects are currently costly and limited. We have responded to increases in insurance costs and coverage limitations by increasing our self-insured retentions and claim reserves. There can be no assurance that coverage will not be further restricted andor become more costly. Additionally, we are exposed to counterparty default risk related to our subcontractors, and our insurance carriers, and our subcontractors’ insurance carriers.

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could delay deliveries, increase costs, and decrease demand for new homes in affected areas.

Our homebuilding operations are located in many areas that are subject to natural disasters and severe weather. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can delay new home deliveries, increase costs by damaging inventories, reduce the availability of materials, and negatively impact the demand for new homes in affected areas. Furthermore, if our insurance does not fully cover business interruptions or losses resulting from these events, our earnings, liquidity, or capital resources could be adversely affected.

Inflation may result in increased costs that we may not be able to recoup.

Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing costs of land, materials, and labor may require us to increase the sales prices of homes in order to maintain satisfactory margins. However, we may not be able to raise home prices sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation and our margins could decrease. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which could have a negative impact on housing demand.

Information technology failures or data security breaches could harm our business.
We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational activities and to maintain our business records. Our computer systems, including our back-up systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches (through cyber-attackscyberattacks from computer hackers and sophisticated organizations), catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes and hurricanes, and usage errors by our associates. If our computer systems and our back-up systems are damaged, breached, or cease to function properly, we could suffer interruptions in our operations or unintentionally allow misappropriation of proprietary or confidential information (including information about our homebuyers and business partners), which could require us to incur significant costs to remediate or otherwise resolve these issues.

Future terrorist attacks against the U.S. or increased domestic and international instability could have an adverse effect on our operations.

A future terrorist attack against the U.S. could cause a sharp decrease in the number of new contracts signed for homes and an increase in the cancellation of existing contracts. Accordingly, adverse developments in the war on terrorism, future terrorist attacks against the U.S., or increased domestic and international instability could adversely affect our business.



14



ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.



ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

Our homebuilding and corporate headquarters are located in leased office facilities at 100 Bloomfield Hills Parkway, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48304.3350 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 150, Atlanta, GA 30326. Pulte Mortgage leases its primary office facilities in Englewood, Colorado. We also maintain various support functions in leased facilities near Phoenix,in Tempe, Arizona and Atlanta, Georgia.Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Our homebuilding divisions and financial services branches lease office space in the geographic locations in which they conduct their day-to-day operations.

Because of the nature of our homebuilding operations, significant amounts of property are held as inventory in the ordinary course. Such properties are not included in response to this Item.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various legal and governmental proceedings incidental to our continuing business operations, many involving claims related to certain construction defects. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in our opinion, after consulting with legal counsel and taking into account insurance and reserves, the ultimate liability is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds our estimates reflected in the recorded reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

This Item is not applicable.



15



ITEM 4A.    EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is certain information with respect to our executive officers.
Name Age Position 
Year Became
An Executive Officer
 Age Position 
Year Became
An Executive Officer
Richard J. Dugas, Jr. 48 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 2002 51 Executive Chairman 2002
Ryan R. Marshall 42 President and Chief Executive Officer 2012
Robert T. O'Shaughnessy 48 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2011 51 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2011
James R. Ellinghausen 58 Executive Vice President, Human Resources 2005
Harmon D. Smith 50 
Executive Vice President - Homebuilding Operations and Area
   President, Texas
 2011 53 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 2011
James R. Ellinghausen 55 Executive Vice President, Human Resources 2005
Steven M. Cook 55 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 2006 58 Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary 2006
Stephen P. Schlageter 43 Area President, Northeast 2012
Ryan R. Marshall 39 Area President, Southeast 2012
Patrick J. Beirne 50 Area President, Central 2011
John J. Chadwick 52 Area President, Southwest 2012
James L. Ossowski 45 Vice President, Finance and Controller 2013 48 Vice President, Finance and Controller 2013
The following is a brief account of the business experience of each officer during the past five years:
Mr. Dugas was appointed Chairman in August 2009 and President andExecutive Chairman in September 2016. He served as Chief Executive Officer infrom July 2003. Previously, he2003 to September 2016 and was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2002 and Chief Operating Officer in May 20022002.
Mr. Marshall was appointed Chief Executive Officer in September 2016. Previously, he held the position of President since February 2016 and Executive Vice President, Homebuilding Operations since May 2014. He was appointed Area President, Southeast in December 2002. Since joining our companyNovember 2012; Area President, Florida in 1994, he has servedMay 2012; and Division President, South Florida in a variety of management positions.2006.
Mr. O'Shaughnessy was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in May 2011. Prior to joining our company, he held a number of financial roles at Penske Automotive Group from 1997 to 2011, most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Smith was appointed Executive Vice President - Homebuilding Operations and Area President, Texas, in May 2012, and previously held the position of Area President, Gulf Coast since 2008. He has served as an Area President over various geographical markets since 2006.
Mr. Ellinghausen was appointed Executive Vice President, Human Resources in December 2006.
Mr. CookSmith was appointed SeniorExecutive Vice President General Counsel and SecretaryChief Operating Office in December 2008 and previously held the position of Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since February 2006.
Mr. Schlageter was appointed Area President, Northeast in November 20122016 and previously held the positions of Executive Vice President, Strategic PlanningField Operations since October 2010May 2014 and Division President, Raleigh since November 2003.
Mr. Marshall was appointedHomebuilding Operations and Area President, Southeast in November 2012 and previously held the positions of Area President, FloridaTexas since May 2012 and Division President, South Florida since 2006.
Mr. Beirne was appointed Area President, Central in 2012 and has2012. He served as an Area President over various geographical markets since 2006.
Mr. ChadwickCook was appointed AreaExecutive Vice President, SouthwestChief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in 2012September 2015 and previously served as Division President, Arizona. Since 2006, Mr. Chadwick has held the positionpositions of AreaSenior Vice President, or Division President over various geographical markets.General Counsel and Secretary since December 2008.
Mr. Ossowski was appointed Vice President, Finance and Controller in February 2013 and previously held the position of Vice President, Finance - Homebuilding Operations since August 2010. Since 2002, Mr. Ossowski has held various finance positions of increasing responsibility with the Company.
There is no family relationship between any of the officers. Each officer serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.



16



PART II
 
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Symbol: PHM).

Related StockholderShareholder Matters

The table below sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated, the range of high and low closingintraday sales prices for our common shares and dividend per share information:
 
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
High Low Declared
Dividend
 High Low Declared
Dividend
High Low Declared
Dividend
 High Low Declared
Dividend
1st Quarter$21.67
 $18.02
 $
 $9.61
 $6.52
 $
$18.82
 $14.61
 $0.09
 $23.24
 $20.56
 $0.08
2nd Quarter24.25
 17.54
 
 10.70
 7.69
 
19.80
 16.60
 0.09
 22.78
 18.85
 0.08
3rd Quarter20.39
 15.11
 0.10
 16.98
 10.02
 
22.40
 19.04
 0.09
 22.02
 18.72
 0.08
4th Quarter20.37
 15.54
 0.05
 18.61
 15.24
 
20.66
 17.69
 0.09
 20.21
 17.18
 0.09

At February 1, 2014January 26, 2017, there were 2,8682,461 shareholders of record.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
(a)
Total number
of shares
purchased (1)
 
(b)
Average
price paid
per share (1)
 
(c)
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
 
(d)
Approximate dollar
value of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans or
programs
($000’s omitted)
 
October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013
 $
 
 $269,321
(2)
November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013894,286
 16.77
 886,509
 $254,467
(2)
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 20131,238,872
 18.34
 1,100,000
 $234,290
(2)
Total2,133,158
 $17.68
 1,986,509
   
 
Total number
of shares
purchased
 
Average
price paid
per share
 
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
 
Approximate dollar
value of shares
that may yet be
purchased under
the plans or
programs
($000’s omitted)
 
October 1, 2016 to October 31, 20163,963,535
 $19.66
 3,963,535
 $1,179,181
(2)
November 1, 2016 to November 30, 20164,743,500
 18.59
 4,743,500
 $1,091,004
(2)
December 1, 2016 to December 31, 20164,523,842
 19.07
 4,521,729
 $1,004,765
(2)
Total13,230,877
 $19.07
 13,228,764
   
 


(1)During the fourth quarter of 2013, a total of 146,6492016, participants surrendered 2,113 shares were surrendered by employees for payment of minimum tax obligations upon the vesting or exercise of previously granted stock-basedshare-based compensation awards. Such shares were not repurchased as part of our publicly-announced stockshare repurchase programs.

(2)Pursuant to the two $100 million share repurchase programs authorized and announced by ourThe Board of Directors in October 2002 and October 2005, the $200 million share repurchase authorized and announced in February 2006, and the $250 million share repurchase authorized and announced in July 2013 (for a total share repurchase authorization of $650 million), we have repurchased a total of 16,925,409 shares for a total of $415.8 million. We have fully utilized the authorizations provided by the 2002, 2005, and 2006approved share repurchase authorizations totaling $300.0 million and will no longer conduct share repurchases under these programs. The$1.0 billion in December 2015 and July 2013 share repurchase authorization has $234.32016, respectively, of which $1,004.8 million remainingremained available as of December 31, 2013.2016. There isare no expiration datedates for this program.these programs. During 2016, we repurchased 30.9 million shares under these programs.

The information required by this item with respect to equity compensation plans is set forth under Item 12 of this annual report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

17




Performance Graph

The following line graph compares for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092012, 20102013, 20112014, 20122015, and 20132016 (a) the yearly cumulative total shareholder return (i.e., the change in share price plus the cumulative amount of dividends, assuming dividend reinvestment, divided by the initial share price, expressed as a percentage) on PulteGroup’s common shares, with (b) the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, and with (c) the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. The Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index is a widely-recognized index comprised primarily of large national homebuilders. We believe comparison of our shareholder return to this index represents a meaningful analysis for investors.

COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG PULTEGROUP, INC., S&P 500 INDEX, AND PEER INDEX
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20132016


 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
PULTEGROUP, INC. 100.00
 91.49
 68.80
 57.73
 166.15
 187.99
 100.00
 287.80
 325.20
 346.27
 292.86
 307.98
S&P 500 Index - Total Return 100.00
 126.47
 145.52
 148.59
 172.37
 228.17
 100.00
 116.00
 153.57
 174.60
 177.01
 198.18
Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction
Index
 100.00
 103.13
 114.65
 104.90
 188.49
 223.18
 100.00
 179.68
 212.75
 223.71
 235.89
 241.14

* Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20082011, and the reinvestment of dividends.

18




ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data for each of the past five fiscal years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Years Ended December 31,
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 (a)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
OPERATING DATA:                  
Homebuilding:                  
Revenues$5,538,644
 $4,659,110
 $4,033,596
 $4,447,627
 $3,966,589
$7,487,350
 $5,841,211
 $5,696,725
 $5,538,644
 $4,659,110
Income (loss) before income taxes$479,113
 $157,991
 $(275,830) $(1,240,155) $(1,920,081)
Income before income taxes$860,766
 $757,317
 $635,177
 $479,113
 $157,991
Financial Services:                  
Revenues$140,951
 $160,888
 $103,094
 $121,663
 $117,800
$181,126
 $140,753
 $125,638
 $140,951
 $160,888
Income (loss) before income taxes$48,709
 $25,563
 $(34,470) $5,609
 $(55,038)
Income before income taxes$73,084
 $58,706
 $54,581
 $48,709
 $25,563
                  
Consolidated results:                  
Revenues$5,679,595
 $4,819,998
 $4,136,690
 $4,569,290
 $4,084,389
$7,668,476
 $5,981,964
 $5,822,363
 $5,679,595
 $4,819,998
                  
Income (loss) before income taxes$527,822
 $183,554
 $(310,300) $(1,234,546) $(1,975,119)
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,092,294) (22,591) (99,912) (137,817) (792,552)
Net income (loss)$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388) $(1,096,729) $(1,182,567)
Income before income taxes$933,850
 $816,023
 $689,758
 $527,822
 $183,554
Income tax (expense) benefit(331,147) (321,933) (215,420) 2,092,294
 22,591
Net income$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
 $2,620,116
 $206,145
                  
PER SHARE DATA:                  
Net income (loss) per share:         
Net income per share:         
Basic$6.79
 $0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90) $(3.94)$1.76
 $1.38
 $1.27
 $6.79
 $0.54
Diluted$6.72
 $0.54
 $(0.55) $(2.90) $(3.94)$1.75
 $1.36
 $1.26
 $6.72
 $0.54
Number of shares used in calculation:                  
Basic383,077
 381,562
 379,877
 378,585
 300,179
339,747
 356,576
 370,377
 383,077
 381,562
Effect of dilutive securities3,789
 3,002
 
 
 
2,376
 3,217
 3,725
 3,789
 3,002
Diluted386,866
 384,564
 379,877
 378,585
 300,179
342,123
 359,793
 374,102
 386,866
 384,564
Shareholders’ equity$12.19
 $5.66
 $5.07
 $5.59
 $8.39
$14.60
 $13.63
 $13.01
 $12.19
 $5.66
Cash dividends declared$0.15
 $
 $
 $
 $
$0.36
 $0.33
 $0.23
 $0.15
 $

(a)
Includes operations of Centex since August 18, 2009.

19




December 31,
($000’s omitted)
December 31,
($000’s omitted)
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 (a)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
BALANCE SHEET DATA:                  
House and land inventory$3,978,561
 $4,214,046
 $4,636,468
 $4,781,813
 $4,940,358
$6,770,655
 $5,450,058
 $4,392,100
 $3,978,561
 $4,214,046
Total assets(a)8,734,143
 6,734,409
 6,885,620
 7,699,376
 10,051,222
10,178,200
 9,189,406
 8,560,187
 8,719,886
 6,719,093
Senior notes2,058,168
 2,509,613
 3,088,344
 3,391,668
 4,281,532
Senior notes and term loan (a)
3,110,016
 2,074,505
 1,809,338
 2,043,910
 2,494,297
Shareholders’ equity4,648,952
 2,189,616
 1,938,615
 2,135,167
 3,194,440
4,659,363
 4,759,325
 4,804,954
 4,648,952
 2,189,616
                  
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 (a)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
OTHER DATA:                  
Markets, at year-end48
 58
 61
 67
 69
49
 50
 49
 48
 58
Active communities, at year-end577
 670
 700
 786
 882
726
 620
 598
 577
 670
Closings (units)17,766
 16,505
 15,275
 17,095
 15,013
19,951
 17,127
 17,196
 17,766
 16,505
Net new orders (units)17,080
 19,039
 15,215
 15,148
 14,185
20,326
 18,008
 16,652
 17,080
 19,039
Backlog (units), at year-end5,772
 6,458
 3,924
 3,984
 5,931
7,422
 6,731
 5,850
 5,772
 6,458
Average selling price (per unit)$305,000
 $276,000
 $259,000
 $259,000
 $258,000
$373,000
 $338,000
 $329,000
 $305,000
 $276,000
Gross margin from home sales (b)
20.5% 15.8% 12.8% 9.4% (10.5)%25.0% 26.9% 26.7% 24.1% 19.6%

 (a)
Includes operationsCertain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation following the adoption of Centex Corporation since ASU 2015-03, which resulted in the reclassification of applicable unamortized debt issuance costs from other assets to senior notes and term loan, and the reclassification of unbilled insurance receivables to other assets from accrued and other liabilities. SeeAugust 18, 2009 Note 1.
(b)
Homebuilding interest expense, which represents the amortization of capitalized interest, and land impairment charges are included in home sale cost of revenues. All periods reflect the reclassification of sales commissions expense from home sale cost of revenues to selling, general, and administrative expenses. See Note 1.


20




ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The underlying trendsImproved demand conditions in the overall U.S. housing point toward an ongoing multi-yearmarket continued in 2016, though industry-wide new home sales continue to pace below historical averages. We remain pleased with the overall demand for new homes, which continues along a sustained path of recovery supported by favorable demographics, an improving economy, mortgageongoing job creation, low unemployment, a supportive interest rates near historic lows,rate environment, and a limited suppliessupply of new homes. Within this environment, we remain focused on driving additional gains in construction and existing home inventories. Ourasset efficiency to deliver higher returns on invested capital. Consistent with our positive market view and long-term business strategy, we expect to use our capital to support future growth while consistently returning funds to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
The nature of the homebuilding industry results in 2013 showed significant improvementa lag between when investments made in the majority of our key operating metrics in the first half of theland acquisition and development yield new community openings and related home closings. We have looked toward 2016 as a year while demand conditions slowed for us in the second half of the year as consumers adjusted to higher home prices and a moderate rise in mortgage interest rates. For the full year 2013, the overall improvement in market conditions, in concert with our own tactical actions, contributed to our seventh consecutive profitable quarter. Home closings, revenues, average selling price, inventory turns, gross margin, overhead leverage, and income before income taxes all improved in 2013 compared with 2012.

Our net new orders declined 10% in 2013 compared with 2012. A lower number of active communities contributedwhere we would begin adding volume growth to the declineefficiency gains we have achieved in recent years. Our prior investments are allowing us to grow the business, as evidenced by 13% growth in net new orders and a 29% increase in home sale revenues to $7.5 billion. We achieved this growth while also maintaining our focus on gross margin performance through community location, strategic pricing, and construction efficiencies.
During 2016, we opened approximately 200 new communities across our local markets as a result of increased land investment over the last few years. Additionally, we maintained 14% fewer activeacquired substantially all of the assets of JW Homes ("Wieland") in January 2016, which also contributed to the growth in community count. This volume of new community openings can present a challenge in today's environment where entitlement and land development delays are common. We have grown our investment in the business in a disciplined manner by emphasizing smaller projects and working to shorten our years of land supply, including the use of land option agreements when possible. We have also focused our land investments on closer-in locations where we think demand is more sustainable when the market ultimately moderates. We have accepted the trade-off of having to pay more for certain land positions where we can be more confident in future performance. Leveraging our increased land investments, we expect to open an even higher number of new communities in 2013 compared with 2012. The lower active community count resulted from the close-out of a number of long-term projects and is consistent with2017 than we did in 2016, which we expect will help our more disciplined land investment strategy. In addition, demand slowedvolume grow in the second half of 2013 in response to higher home prices and a rise in mortgage interest rates. We will continue to calibrate sales pace in each community to improve our gross margins and maximize returns on invested capital. We expect that this approach will continue to result in a moderation in our net new order volume in the short-term relative to overall growth in the U.S. homebuilding industry and relative to certain of our competitors. While we believe higher mortgage interest rates are inevitable and may have a moderating effect on demand and pricing, we believe this impact will be outweighed in the long-term by other factors driving increased sales volume as overall new home sales in the U.S. remain low compared with historical levels.2017.

The significant improvements reported for 2013 also allowed us to continue to enhance our financial position. We generated significant positive cash flow from operations in each of the last two years via a combination of improved profitability and inventory management. Our improved financial position provided additional flexibility to retire debt early and increase our planned future investments in newfuture communities while also paying a dividendreturning funds to shareholders through dividends and selectively repurchasing our common shares.expanded share repurchases. Specifically, we accomplished the following during 2013:in 2016:

Increased our total cash balance to $1.7 billion;
Proactively reduced our outstanding debt by $461.4 million;
Increased our existing share repurchase authorization by $250.0 million and retired $127.7 million of shares;
Reinstated a quarterly dividend;
Increased our land investment spending by 24% to support future growth;growth while also acquiring the Wieland assets for $430.5 million;
Maintained our quarterly dividend at $0.09 per share;
Repurchased $600.0 million of shares under our share repurchase plan and authorized an additional $1.0 billion for future repurchases;
Issued $2.0 billion of senior notes while also expanding and extending our unsecured revolving credit agreement; and
Lowered our ratio ofEnded the year with a debt to total capitalization from 53.4% to 30.7%ratio of 40.0%, in part due to the reversalwhich is within our targeted range, and a cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balance of a valuation allowance against$723.2 million with no borrowings outstanding under our deferred tax assets.

In the short-term, we will continue to focus on maximizing our operating margins, despite the possibility of rising house cost pressures from material and labor prices, by using our existing land assets more effectively, allocating capital more effectively, and aggressively controlling unsold "spec" inventory to enhance our balance sheet. We believe we have positioned ourselves to deliver improved long-term returns. In planning for the longer term, we continue to maintain confidence that we are in the early stages of a broad, sustainable recovery in the U.S. new home market. While the U.S. macroeconomic environment continues to face challenges and each local market will experience varying results, we are continuing to pursue strategic land positions that meet our underwriting requirements in well-positioned submarkets and believe that sustained execution of our strategy will continue to result in increased profits and improved returns on invested capital over the housing cycle.unsecured revolving credit agreement.




21




The following is a summary of our operating results by line of business ($000's omitted, except per share data):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Income (loss) before income taxes:     
Homebuilding$479,113
 $157,991
 $(275,830)
Financial Services48,709
 25,563
 (34,470)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes527,822
 183,554
 (310,300)
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,092,294) (22,591) (99,912)
Net income (loss)$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)
Per share data - assuming dilution:     
Net income (loss)$6.72
 $0.54
 $(0.55)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Income before income taxes:     
Homebuilding$860,766
 $757,317
 $635,177
Financial Services73,084
 58,706
 54,581
Income before income taxes933,850
 816,023
 689,758
Income tax expense(331,147) (321,933) (215,420)
Net income$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
Per share data - assuming dilution:     
Net income$1.75
 $1.36
 $1.26

The Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes included charges related
Homebuilding income before income taxes improved each year from 2014 to 2016. Revenues increased each year and SG&A leverage improved. In 2016, the revenue increase was partially offset by lower gross margins and higher overhead costs, both of which were partially attributable to the assets acquired from Wieland in January 2016 (see Note 1). Homebuilding income before income taxes also reflected the following significant expense (income) items ($000's omitted):
 2013 2012 2011
Land-related charges (see Note 4)
$9,672
 $17,195
 $35,786
Loss on debt retirements (see Note 7)
26,930
 32,071
 5,638
Settlement of contractual dispute at a closed-out community (see Note 13)
41,170
 
 
Goodwill impairments (see Note 2)

 
 240,541
 $77,772
 $49,266
 $281,965
 2016 2015 2014
Corporate office relocation (see Note 2)
$8,284
 $4,369
 $16,344
Other severance and lease exit related costs (see Note 1)
13,389
 
 
Land-related charges (see Note 3)
19,336
 11,467
 11,168
Loss on debt retirements (see Note 6)
657
 
 8,584
Applecross matter (see Note 12)

 20,000
 
Settlement of disputed land transaction (see Note 12)
15,000
 
 
Insurance reserve adjustments (see Note 12)
(55,243) (62,183) 69,267
 $1,423
 $(26,347) $105,363

For additional information on each of the above, see the applicable Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our Homebuilding operatingThe acquisition of certain real estate assets from Wieland in January 2016 and Dominion Homes in August 2014 (see Note 1) were not material to our results in 2013 and 2012 improved significantly from the loss experienced in 2011 due to higher revenues and gross margins, improved overhead leverage, and lower charges, as listed in the above table.of operations or financial condition.

The increase in Financial Services income in 20132016 compared with 20122015 and 20112014 was primarily due to loweran increase in mortgage origination volume. During 2015 and 2014, we reduced our loan loss reserves. There were no such loss reserves in 2013 compared with $49.0origination liabilities by net reserve releases of $11.4 million in 2012 and $59.3$18.6 million, in 2011 (see respectively, which favorably impacted Financial Services income. See Note 1312 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Additionally, loan origination volume increased in 2013 compared with 2012 and 2011, primarily as the result of increased Homebuilding closings. These favorable factors were partially offset in 2013 by margin compression caused by heightened competition in the mortgage industry compared with 2012.

The incomeOur effective tax benefit in 2013 includes $2.1 billion related to the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our deferred tax assets.rate was 35.5%, 39.5% and 31.2% for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. See Note 109to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The income tax benefits in 2012 and 2011 were attributable primarily to the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters..

22





Homebuilding Operations

The following is a summary of income (loss) before income taxes for our Homebuilding operations ($000’s omitted):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 20112016 FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014
Home sale revenues$5,424,309
 19 % $4,552,412
 15 % $3,950,743
$7,451,315
 29 % $5,792,675
 2 % $5,662,171
Land sale revenues114,335
 7 % 106,698
 29 % 82,853
36,035
 (26)% 48,536
 40 % 34,554
Total Homebuilding revenues5,538,644
 19 % 4,659,110
 16 % 4,033,596
7,487,350
 28 % 5,841,211
 3 % 5,696,725
Home sale cost of revenues (a)
4,310,528
 12 % 3,833,451
 11 % 3,444,398
Home sale cost of revenues (a) (b)
(5,587,974) 32 % (4,235,945) 2 % (4,149,674)
Land sale cost of revenues (b)
104,426
 10 % 94,880
 60 % 59,279
(32,115) (10)% (35,858) 51 % (23,748)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A") (c)
568,500
 11 % 514,457
 (1)% 519,583
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities(993) (74)% (3,873) 21 % (3,194)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A") (b) (c)
(957,150) 20 % (794,728) (8)% (861,390)
Other expense, net (d)
80,753
 22 % 66,298
 (77)% 293,102
(49,345) 184 % (17,363) (35)% (26,736)
Interest income, net(3,683) (10)% (4,094) 9 % (3,742)
Income (loss) before income taxes$479,113
 203 % $157,991
 157 % $(275,830)
Income before income taxes$860,766
 14 % $757,317
 19 % $635,177
Supplemental data:             

   

Gross margin from home sales20.5% 470 bps
 15.8% 300 bps
 12.8%
SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues10.5% (80) bps
 11.3% (190) bps
 13.2%
Gross margin from home sales (a) (b)
25.0% (190) bps
 26.9% 20 bps
 26.7%
SG&A % of home sale revenues (b) (c)
12.8% (90) bps
 13.7% (150) bps
 15.2%
Closings (units)17,766
 8 % 16,505
 8 % 15,275
19,951
 16 % 17,127
  % 17,196
Average selling price$305
 11 % $276
 7 % $259
$373
 10 % $338
 3 % $329
Net new orders:
         
Net new orders (e):
         
Units17,080
 (10)% 19,039
 25 % 15,215
20,326
 13 % 18,008
 8 % 16,652
Dollars (e)
$5,394,566
 (1)% $5,424,300
 37 % $3,953,829
Dollars$7,753,399
 23 % $6,305,380
 13 % $5,558,937
Cancellation rate15%   15%   19%15%   14%   15%
Active communities at December 31577
 (14)% 670
 (4)% 700
726
 17 % 620
 4 % 598
Backlog at December 31:                  
Units5,772
 (11)% 6,458
 65 % 3,924
7,422
 10 % 6,731
 15 % 5,850
Dollars$1,901,796
 (2)% $1,931,538
 82 % $1,059,649
$2,941,512
 20 % $2,456,565
 26 % $1,943,861

(a)
Includes the amortization of capitalized interest. Home sale cost of revenues also includes land impairments of $2.9 million, $13.4 million, and $15.9 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
(b)
Includes net realizable value adjustments for land held forAll periods reflect the reclassification of sales commissions expense from home sale cost of $3.6 million, $1.5 million,revenues to selling, general, and administrative expenses (see Note 1$9.8 million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.).
(c)SG&A includes
Includes costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters totaling $15.0$1.0 million, $2.0 million, and $7.6 million in 2013.2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively (see Note 2); severance costs of $9.1 million in 2016; adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to reserve reversals of $55.2 million in 2016 and $62.2 million in 2015; and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12).
(d)
Includes the write-offa charge of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue of $3.1$15.0 million, $2.3 million, and $10.0 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and net losses2016 related to the redemptionsettlement of debt totaling $26.9a disputed land transaction and a charge of $20.0 million, $32.1 million, and $5.6 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Also includes charges2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12). See "Other expense, net" for a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community totaling $41.2 million in 2013 and goodwill impairment charges of $240.5 million in 2011.table summarizing other significant items.
(e)
Net new orders excludes backlog acquired from Wieland in January 2016 (see Note 1). Net new order dollars represent a composite of new order dollars combined with other movements of the dollars in backlog related to cancellations and change orders.


23




Home sale revenues

Home sale revenues for 20132016 were higher than 20122015 by $871.9 million,$1.7 billion, or 19%. The increase was attributable to an 11% increase in the average selling price combined with an 8% increase in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred in substantially all of our local markets and reflects an ongoing shift in our revenue mix toward move-up and active adult buyers and improved market conditions that have allowed for increased sale prices, including higher levels of house options and lot premiums. The increase in closings reflected improved consumer demand for new homes in the majority of our local markets.

Home sale revenues for 2012 were higher than 2011 by $601.7 million, or 15%29%. The increase was attributable to a 7%10% increase in the average selling price combined with an 8%and a 16% increase in closings. These increases reflect the impact of communities acquired from Wieland during the period, which contributed 6% to the growth in revenue, 4% to the growth in closings and 1% to the increase in average selling price. Excluding the communities acquired from Wieland, the increase in closings reflects the significant investments we are making in opening new communities combined with improved demand. The higher average selling price for 2016 reflects an ongoing shift toward move-up buyers, the inclusion of higher-priced homes offered in Wieland communities, and generally stable market conditions.

Home sale revenues for 2015 were higher than 2014 by $130.5 million, or 2%. The increase was attributable to a 3% increase in the average selling price while closings remained relatively flat. The increase in average selling price reflected a shift in our revenue mix toward move-up buyers. Closing volume was flat as higher net new orders were offset by production delays in certain communities caused by a number of factors, including tight labor resources and active adult buyers and improved marketadverse weather conditions. The increase in closings was concentrated primarily in our North and Southwest segments.

Home sale gross margins

Home sale gross margins were 20.5%25.0% in 2013,2016, compared with 15.8%26.9% in 20122015 and 12.8%26.7% in 2011.2014. The assets acquired from Wieland contributed 60 basis points to this decrease for this period, primarily as the result of required fair value adjustments associated with the acquired homes in production and related lots. Gross margins during 2013remain strong relative to historical levels and2012 benefited from lower land impairments of $2.9 million and $13.4 million, respectively, compared with $15.9 million in 2011. Excluding the impact of land impairments and capitalized interest amortization, adjusted home sale gross margins improved to 25.2% in 2013 from 20.9% in 2012 and 17.9% in 2011 (see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for a reconciliation of adjusted home sale gross margins). The gross margin improvement was broad-based as substantially all of our operating divisions experienced higher gross margins in 2013 compared with the prior year periods. These improved gross margins reflect a combination of factors, including an improved pricing environment, shifts in community mix, relatively stable pricing conditions in 2016 following strong pricing conditions in 2015 and 2014, and lower amortized interest costs (1.7%, 2.4%, and 3.4% of home sale revenues in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively) combined with higher house construction and land costs as the product mix of homes closed toward move-up and active adult buyers, better alignment ofsupply chain has responded to the housing recovery. The lower amortized interest costs resulted from the reduction in our product offeringoutstanding debt in recent years combined with consumer demand, and contributions from our strategic pricing and house cost reduction initiatives.the significant increase in volume in 2016.

Land sales

We periodically elect to sell parcels of land to third parties in the event such assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans or are zoned for commercial or other development. Land sale revenues and their related gains or losses vary between periods, depending on the timing of land sales and our strategic operating decisions. Land sales had margin contributions of $9.9$3.9 million,, $11.8 $12.7 million,, and $23.6$10.8 million in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively. These margin contributions included net realizable value adjustments related to land held for sale totaling $3.6 million, $1.5 million, and $9.8 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

SG&A

SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues dropped to 10.5%was 12.8% and 13.7% in 2013 from 11.3% in 2012,2016 and 13.2% in 2011.2015, respectively. The gross dollar amount of our SG&A increased $54.0$162.4 million,, or 11%20%, in 20132016 compared with 2015. SG&A included adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to reversals of $55.2 million and $62.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively (see Note 122012). SG&A includes $15.0also reflects severance costs of $9.1 million in 2016 associated with actions taken to reduce overheads and the substantial completion of our corporate headquarters relocation from Michigan to Georgia, which began in 2013 (see Note 2). Excluding these items, the improvement in our year-over-year SG&A leverage was even greater. The increase in gross dollar SG&A reflects the addition of field resources and other variable costs related to increased production volumes combined with higher costs related to healthcare and professional fees. Additionally, SG&A for 2016 reflects the impact of transaction and integration costs associated with the assets acquired from Wieland in January 2016 (see Note 1).

SG&A as a percentage of home sale revenues was 13.7% and 15.2% in 2015 and 2014, respectively. The gross dollar amount of our SG&A decreased $66.7 million, or 8%, in 2015 compared with 2014. SG&A included reserve reversals totaling $62.2 million in 2015 and charges totaling $69.3 million to increase general liability reserves in 2014 (see Note 12). Additionally, we incurred $2.0 million and $7.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, of employee severance, retention, relocation, and related costs attributable to our previously announcedthe relocation of our corporate headquarters. The remaining increasesheadquarters (see Note 2). Excluding each of these items, SG&A in both dollars and as a percentage of home sale revenues increased for 2015 compared with 2014. This increase in gross overhead dollars werein 2015 was primarily due to variable costs related to the higher revenue volume combinedinvestments in increased headcount and information systems along with higher incentive compensation accruals resulting fromcosts in conjunction with the Company's improved operating performance.

The gross dollar amountopening of our SG&A decreased $5.1 million, or 1%, in 2012 compared with 2011 due to improved overhead leverage, partially offset by higher incentive compensation resulting from our improved operating results.

Equity in (earnings) lossan increased number of unconsolidated entities

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities was new communities.$(1.0) million, $(3.9) million, and $(3.2) million for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The majority of our unconsolidated entities represent land development joint ventures. As a result, the timing of income and losses varies between periods depending on the timing of transactions and circumstances specific to each entity.





24



Other expense, net

Other expense, net includes the following ($000’s omitted):
 2013 2012 2011
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 4)
$3,122
 $2,278
 $10,002
Loss on debt retirements (Note 7)
26,930
 32,071
 5,638
Lease exit and related costs2,778
 7,306
 9,900
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,100
 13,100
 13,100
Goodwill impairments (Note 2)

 
 240,541
Miscellaneous expense, net34,823
 11,543
 13,921
 $80,753
 $66,298
 $293,102
 2016 2015 2014
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 3)
$17,157
 $5,021
 $6,099
Loss on debt retirements (Note 6)
657
 
 8,584
Lease exit and related costs11,643
 2,463
 9,609
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,800
 12,900
 13,033
Interest income(3,236) (3,107) (4,632)
Interest expense686
 788
 849
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities (Note 5)
(8,337) (7,355) (8,226)
Miscellaneous, net16,975
 6,653
 1,420
Total other expense, net$49,345
 $17,363
 $26,736

Lease exit and related costs for 2016 resulted from actions taken to reduce overheads and the substantial completion of our corporate headquarters relocation from Michigan to Georgia, which began in 2013 and also significantly impacted 2014 (see Note 2). The increase in write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for 2016 related primarily to one project in California that we elected to not complete. Miscellaneous, net includes a charge of $15.0 million related to the settlement of a disputed land transaction in 2016 and a charge of $20.0 million resulting from the Applecross matter in 2015 (see Note 12). For additional information on each of the above, see the applicable Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Miscellaneous expense, net includes charges of $41.2 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community, and $5.1 million in 2012 and $17.1 million in 2011 related to the write-down of notes receivable.

Interest income, net

Interest income, net for 2013 decreased from the prior year based on the level of invested cash balances and low returns on invested cash available in the current interest rate environment.

Net new orders

Net new orders decreased 10%increased 13% in 20132016 compared with 20122015. The increase resulted primarily from selling from a larger number of active communities, which increased 17% to 726 at December 31, 2016. The communities acquired from Wieland contributed to this growth in units by 4%. Excluding the Wieland assets, our growth in net new order units resulted from the higher number of active communities combined with a small improvement in sales pace per community. Net new orders in dollars increased by 23% compared with 2015 due to selling from 14% fewer active communitiesthe growth in 2013 (577 at December 31, 2013)units combined with slowed demand in the second half of 2013 in response to higher home prices and a rise in mortgage interest rates.average selling price. The cancellation rate (canceled orders for the period divided by gross new orders for the period) was unchangedincreased slightly in 2016 from 2012 to 20132015 at 15%. and 14%, respectively. Ending backlog units, which represent orders for homes that have not yet closed, decreased 11%increased 10% at December 31, 20132016 compared with December 31, 2012, due to the decrease2015 as measured in net new orders but only decreased by 2%units and increased 20% over the prior year period as measured in dollars. The higher average sales price also contributed to the higher backlog dollars.

Net new orders increased 8% in 2015 compared with 2014. The increase resulted from improved sales per community combined with selling from a larger number of active communities, which increased 4% to 620 active communities at December 31, 2015. The cancellation rate decreased slightly in 2015 from 2014 at 14% and 15%, respectively. Ending backlog units increased 15% at December 31, 2015 compared with December 31, 2014 and increased 26% as measured in dollars due to the increase in our average selling price.

Net The higher backlog resulted from higher net new order levels increased 25%volume combined with production delays in 2012 compared with 2011 while selling from 4% fewer activecertain communities in 2012 (we had 670 active communities at December 31, 2012). The cancellation rate was 15% in 2012 compared with 19% in 2011. Ending backlog units increased 65% at December 31, 2012 compared with December 31, 2011 due to the decrease in net new orders.2015 caused by a number of factors, including tight labor resources and adverse weather conditions.

Homes in production

The following is a summary of our homes in production at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015:
 2013 2012 2016 2015
Sold 3,723
 4,162
 5,138
 4,573
Unsold        
Under construction 813
 753
 1,703
 1,450
Completed 338
 503
 645
 471
 1,151
 1,256
 2,348
 1,921
Models 1,034
 1,119
 1,072
 1,024
Total 5,908
 6,537
 8,558
 7,518



The number of homes in production at December 31, 20132016 was 10% lower than at 14% higher compared to December 31, 20122015. The increase in homes under production was due to a combination of factors, including a 17% increase in active communities, a 10% increase in ending backlog units, higher net new order volume, and a decision to purposefully increase the number of unsold homes under construction ("spec homes"). The reduced levelincrease in spec homes reflects our intentions to achieve a more even flow production cycle over the course of homes in production is consistent2017 compared with our lower active community count andrecent years. As part of our inventory management strategies. Reducing our reliance on sales of spec homes is a componentstrategy, we will continue to maintain reasonable inventory levels relative to demand in each of our strategic pricing and inventory turns objectives, so we have focusedmarkets. We continue to focus on reducing themaintaining a low level of our spec home inventory, especially our completed specs, ("final specs").though inventory levels tend to fluctuate throughout the year.

25




Controlled lots

The following is a summary of our lots under control at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015:
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled Owned Optioned Controlled
Northeast 7,423
 2,762
 10,185
 9,211
 2,655
 11,866
 6,296
 4,019
 10,315
 6,361
 4,114
 10,475
Southeast 12,702
 4,296
 16,998
 13,372
 2,756
 16,128
 16,050
 8,232
 24,282
 11,161
 7,933
 19,094
Florida 21,805
 6,956
 28,761
 23,906
 3,689
 27,595
 22,164
 8,470
 30,634
 21,230
 9,636
 30,866
Midwest 11,800
 8,639
 20,439
 13,093
 6,985
 20,078
Texas 12,038
 3,860
 15,898
 12,218
 3,685
 15,903
 13,541
 9,802
 23,343
 13,308
 7,052
 20,360
North 11,785
 7,952
 19,737
 12,946
 2,603
 15,549
Southwest 29,459
 2,440
 31,899
 31,407
 1,427
 32,834
West 29,428
 4,817
 34,245
 30,766
 6,440
 37,206
Total 95,212
 28,266
 123,478
 103,060
 16,815
 119,875
 99,279
 43,979
 143,258
 95,919
 42,160
 138,079
                        
Developed (%) 24% 18% 23% 27% 34% 28% 31% 19% 28% 28% 12% 23%

Of our controlled lots, 95,21299,279 and 103,06095,919 were owned and 28,26643,979 and 16,81542,160 were under land option agreements at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. While competition for well-positioned land has increased,is robust, we
continue to pursue strategic land positions that meet our underwriting requirements while also using our existing land assets more effectively.

drive appropriate returns on invested capital. The remaining purchase price under our land option agreements totaled $1.4$2.1 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. These land option agreements which generally may be canceled at our discretion and in certain cases extend over several years, are secured byyears. Our maximum exposure related to these land option agreements is generally limited to our deposits and pre-acquisition costs, totaling $91.0which totaled $195.4 million,, of which only $4.5$9.8 million is refundable.refundable, at December 31, 2016.


26



Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This report contains information about our home sale gross margins reflecting certain adjustments. This measure is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the SEC's rules and should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, the comparable GAAP financial measure as a measure of our operating performance. Management and our local divisions use this measure in evaluating the operating performance of each community and in making strategic decisions regarding sales pricing, construction and development pace, product mix, and other daily operating decisions. We believe it is a relevant and useful measures to investors for evaluating our performance through gross profit generated on homes delivered during a given period and for comparing our operating performance to other companies in the homebuilding industry. Although other companies in the homebuilding industry report similar information, the methods used may differ. We urge investors to understand the methods used by other companies in the homebuilding industry to calculate gross margins and any adjustments thereto before comparing our measure to that of such other companies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the GAAP financial measure that management believes to be most directly comparable ($000's omitted):
Adjusted home sale gross margin     
 Years Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Home sale revenues$5,424,309
 $4,552,412
 $3,950,743
Home sale cost of revenues4,310,528
 3,833,451
 3,444,398
Home sale gross margin1,113,781
 718,961
 506,345
Add:     
Land impairments (a)

 6,969
 10,498
Capitalized interest amortization (a)
255,065
 224,291
 189,382
Adjusted home sale gross margin$1,368,846
 $950,221
 $706,225
      
Home sale gross margin as a percentage of home sale revenues20.5% 15.8% 12.8%
Adjusted home sale gross margin as a percentage of home sale revenues25.2% 20.9% 17.9%

(a)Write-offs of capitalized interest related to land impairments are reflected in capitalized interest amortization.

Homebuilding Segment Operations

Our homebuilding operations represent our core business. Homebuilding offers a broad product line to meet the needs of homebuyers in our targeted markets. As of December 31, 20132016, we conducted our operations in 4849 markets located throughout 2725 states. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:
 
Northeast:  Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast:  Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West:  Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern CaliforniaWashington

We also have a reportable segment for our financial services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. The Financial Services segment operates generally in the same markets as the Homebuilding segments.


27




The following table presents selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 20112016 FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014
Home sale revenues:                  
Northeast$784,087
 8 % $722,691
 1 % $714,609
$696,003
 2 % $679,082
 (4)% $708,465
Southeast842,856
 22 % 689,163
 2 % 675,124
Southeast (a)
1,485,809
 40 % 1,058,055
 11 % 949,134
Florida800,331
 29 % 620,156
 11 % 557,865
1,274,237
 26 % 1,012,391
 11 % 913,758
Midwest1,233,110
 22 % 1,012,460
 16 % 869,271
Texas804,806
 21 % 666,759
 8 % 615,319
1,033,387
 23 % 840,766
 (2)% 856,613
North1,214,332
 23 % 989,510
 36 % 727,085
Southwest977,898
 13 % 864,133
 31 % 660,741
West1,728,769
 45 % 1,189,921
 (13)% 1,364,930
$5,424,309
 19 % $4,552,412
 15 % $3,950,743
$7,451,315
 29 % $5,792,675
 2 % $5,662,171
Income (loss) before income taxes:         
Northeast$110,246
 50 % $73,345
 150 % $29,320
Southeast121,055
 87 % 64,678
 44 % 45,060
Income before income taxes:         
Northeast (b)
$81,991
 (1)% $82,616
 (20)% $103,865
Southeast (a)
145,011
 (16)% 172,330
 10 % 156,513
Florida139,673
 90 % 73,472
 63 % 44,946
205,049
 4 % 196,525
 3 % 190,441
Midwest120,159
 31 % 91,745
 16 % 78,863
Texas111,431
 83 % 60,979
 83 % 33,329
152,355
 26 % 121,329
 (9)% 133,005
North164,348
 94 % 84,597
 (b)
 (12,376)
Southwest179,163
 124 % 79,887
 118 % 36,647
West225,771
 33 % 169,394
 (33)% 254,724
Other homebuilding (a)(c)
(346,803) (24)% (278,967) 38 % (452,756)(69,570) 9 % (76,622) 73 % (282,234)
$479,113
 203 % $157,991
 157 % $(275,830)$860,766
 14 % $757,317
 19 % $635,177
Closings (units):                  
Northeast1,835
 2 % 1,800
 (4)% 1,880
1,418
 (5)% 1,496
 (5)% 1,568
Southeast(a)3,022
 10 % 2,757
 (1)% 2,771
3,901
 19 % 3,276
 4 % 3,160
Florida2,747
 17 % 2,340
 4 % 2,251
3,441
 19 % 2,896
 5 % 2,752
Midwest3,418
 15 % 2,961
 15 % 2,581
Texas3,768
 8 % 3,487
 5 % 3,327
3,726
 11 % 3,357
 (10)% 3,750
North3,401
 10 % 3,103
 20 % 2,579
Southwest2,993
 (1)% 3,018
 22 % 2,467
West4,047
 29 % 3,141
 (7)% 3,385
17,766
 8 % $16,505
 8 % 15,275
19,951
 16 % $17,127
  % 17,196
Average selling price:                  
Northeast$427
 6 % $401
 6 % $380
$491
 8 % $454
  % $452
Southeast(a)279
 12 % 250
 2 % 244
381
 18 % 323
 8 % 300
Florida291
 10 % 265
 7 % 248
370
 6 % 350
 5 % 332
Midwest361
 6 % 342
 2 % 337
Texas214
 12 % 191
 3 % 185
277
 11 % 250
 10 % 228
North357
 12 % 319
 13 % 282
Southwest327
 14 % 286
 7 % 268
West427
 13 % 379
 (6)% 403
$305
 11 % $276
 7 % $259
$373
 10 % $338
 3 % $329

(a)
Southeast includes the acquisition in January 2016 of substantially all of the assets of Wieland (see Note 1).
(b)
Northeast includes a charge of $15.0 million in 2016 related to the settlement of a disputed land transaction and a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12).
(c)
Other homebuilding includes the amortization of intangible assets, amortization of capitalized interest, and other items not allocated to the operating segments. Other homebuilding also includes:segments, in addition to: losses on debt retirements totaling $26.9 million, $32.1of $0.7 million and $5.6$8.6 million in 2013, 2012,2016 and 2011, respectively;2014, respectively (see Note 6); adjustments to general liability insurance reserves relating to reversals of $55.2 million and $62.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12); and costs associated with the previously announced relocation of our corporate headquarters totaling $15.4$8.3 million, $4.4 million, and $16.3 million in 2013;2016, 2015, and charges resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community totaling $41.2 million in 2013.
(b)Percentage not meaningful.2014, respectively (see Note 2).


28



The following tables present additional selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 
 Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted) Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2013 FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 2016 FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014
Net new orders - units:                    
Northeast 1,834
 (8)% 1,997
 14% 1,749
 1,361
 (8)% 1,479
 5 % 1,408
Southeast 3,164
 3 % 3,066
 16% 2,642
Southeast (a)
 3,810
 10 % 3,454
 12 % 3,075
Florida 2,595
 (6)% 2,747
 19% 2,314
 3,585
 13 % 3,168
 12 % 2,841
Midwest 3,636
 27 % 2,862
 23 % 2,329
Texas 3,563
 (13)% 4,117
 26% 3,278
 3,793
 11 % 3,429
 (9)% 3,773
North 3,347
 (9)% 3,661
 39% 2,635
Southwest 2,577
 (25)% 3,451
 33% 2,597
West 4,141
 15 % 3,616
 12 % 3,226
 17,080
 (10)% 19,039
 25% 15,215
 20,326
 13 % 18,008
 8 % 16,652
Net new orders - dollars:                    
Northeast $782,474
 (5)% $820,609
 22% $674,134
 $674,066
  % $674,637
 4 % $649,202
Southeast 895,800
 14 % 787,286
 22% 645,993
Southeast (a)
 1,483,139
 28 % 1,160,590
 23 % 944,567
Florida 820,032
 12 % 735,250
 26% 581,778
 1,340,181
 16 % 1,152,705
 21 % 954,892
Midwest 1,351,828
 32 % 1,024,784
 26 % 815,968
Texas 796,377
 (1)% 807,455
 33% 606,239
 1,060,217
 17 % 905,003
 3 % 881,843
North 1,233,071
  % 1,228,743
 64% 748,089
Southwest 866,812
 (17)% 1,044,957
 50% 697,596
West 1,843,968
 33 % 1,387,661
 6 % 1,312,465
 $5,394,566
 (1)% $5,424,300
 37% $3,953,829
 $7,753,399
 23 % $6,305,380
 13 % $5,558,937
Cancellation rates:                    
Northeast 13%   12%   14% 11%   12%   12%
Southeast 12%   13%   16%
Southeast (a)
 15%   10%   12%
Florida 13%   12%   13% 12%   11%   10%
Midwest 12%   13%   13%
Texas 22%   22%   28% 18%   19%   19%
North 11%   13%   17%
Southwest 19%   15%   19%
West 19%   18%   18%
 15%   15%   19% 15%   14%   15%
Unit backlog:                    
Northeast 621
  % 622
 46% 425
 387
 (13)% 444
 (4)% 461
Southeast 1,053
 16 % 911
 51% 602
Southeast (a)
 1,371
 20 % 1,146
 18 % 968
Florida 913
 (14)% 1,065
 62% 658
 1,418
 11 % 1,274
 27 % 1,002
Midwest 1,307
 20 % 1,089
 (8)% 1,188
Texas 1,250
 (14)% 1,455
 76% 825
 1,412
 5 % 1,345
 6 % 1,273
North 1,213
 (4)% 1,267
 79% 709
Southwest 722
 (37)% 1,138
 61% 705
West 1,527
 7 % 1,433
 50 % 958
 5,772
 (11)% 6,458
 65% 3,924
 7,422
 10 % 6,731
 15 % 5,850
Backlog dollars:                    
Northeast $275,239
 (1)% $276,851
 55% $178,934
 $189,595
 (10)% $211,532
 (2)% $215,977
Southeast 305,600
 21 % 252,656
 63% 154,533
Southeast (a)
 583,760
 45 % 403,568
 34 % 301,033
Florida 308,834
 7 % 289,133
 66% 174,039
 556,226
 13 % 490,282
 40 % 349,968
Midwest 501,079
 31 % 382,360
 3 % 370,036
Texas 286,195
 (3)% 294,623
 91% 153,927
 402,491
 7 % 375,660
 21 % 311,424
North 465,480
 4 % 446,741
 115% 207,507
Southwest 260,448
 (30)% 371,534
 95%��190,709
West 708,361
 19 % 593,163
 50 % 395,423
 $1,901,796
 (2)% $1,931,538
 82% $1,059,649
 $2,941,512
 20 % $2,456,565
 26 % $1,943,861

29


(a)
Southeast includes the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Wieland in January 2016 (see Note 1).


The following table presents additional selected financial information for our reportable Homebuilding segments:
 Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted) Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2013 FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 2011 2016 FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014
Land-related charges*:                    
Northeast $557
 (69)% $1,794
 (64)% $4,958
 $2,079
 (37)% $3,301
 17 % $2,824
Southeast 998
 (27)% 1,363
 (44)% 2,429
 3,089
 2 % 3,022
 65 % 1,826
Florida 1,076
 403 % 214
 (95)% 3,999
 715
 (84)% 4,555
 835 % 487
Midwest 3,383
 46 % 2,319
 (1)% 2,347
Texas 191
 (66)% 556
 (33)% 828
 515
 75 % 295
 (8)% 321
North 3,434
 (24)% 4,546
 (69)% 14,867
Southwest 472
 (79)% 2,254
 (31)% 3,263
West 8,960
 (443)% (2,615) (254)% 1,696
Other homebuilding 2,944
 (54)% 6,468
 19 % 5,442
 595
 1 % 590
 (65)% 1,667
 $9,672
 (44)% $17,195
 (52)% $35,786
 $19,336
 69 % $11,467
 3 % $11,168

*
Land-related charges include land impairments, net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale, and write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue.costs. Other homebuilding consists primarily of write-offs of capitalized interest resulting from land-related charges. See Notes 4 3and 54 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of these charges.

Northeast:

The length and complexity of the entitlement process in the Northeast have led to essentially flat volumes in recent years. For 2013,2016, Northeast home sale revenues increased 8%2% compared with 20122015 due to a 5% decrease in closings and an 8% increase in average selling price. The decrease in closings occurred in the Northeast Corridor and Mid-Atlantic while the increase in average selling price occurred across all markets. The decreased income before income taxes resulted from lower margins in the Mid-Atlantic and increased overhead expense in both the Northeast Corridor and Mid-Atlantic. Net new orders decreased 8%, primarily in the Northeast Corridor and Mid-Atlantic.

For 2015, Northeast home sale revenues decreased 4% compared with 2014 due to a 5% decrease in closings. Average selling price remained flat over 2014. The decrease in closings occurred in Mid-Atlantic and New England and contributed to the lower income before income taxes. Net new orders increased 5%, primarily due to higher order levels in the Northeast Corridor.

Northeast income before income taxes also includes a charge of $15.0 million related to the settlement of a disputed land transaction in 2016 and a charge of $20.0 million resulting from the Applecross matter in 2015 (see Note 126%).

Southeast:

In 2016, the Southeast was significantly impacted by the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Wieland in January 2016 (see Note 1). For 2016, Southeast home sale revenues increased 40% compared with 2015 due to an 18% increase in the average selling price combined with a 19% increase in closings. The increases in the average selling price and closings occurred across all markets. These increases are primarily due to contributions from the assets acquired from Wieland. Excluding those closings, revenues still increased compared with the prior year. Income before income taxes decreased 16% as a result of lower gross margins combined with higher overhead costs, including transaction and integration costs associated with the assets acquired from Wieland. Net new orders increased 10%, primarily due to the assets acquired from Wieland. While demand conditions remain favorable, we have experienced some moderation in pace.2%

For 2015, Southeast home sale revenues increased 11% compared with 2014 due to an 8% increase in the average selling price combined with a 4% increase in closings. The increases in the average selling price and closings were broad-based, though Tennessee experienced declines. The increased income before income taxes resulted primarily from higher revenues. Net new orders increased 12% in 2015 mainly due to increased order levels in Raleigh and Georgia, partially offset by a decline in Tennessee.



Florida:

For 2016, Florida home sale revenues increased 26% compared with 2015 due to a 6% increase in the average selling price combined with a 19% increase in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred primarily in New England and Mid-Atlantic.across all markets. The increasedincreased income before income taxes was due tofor 2016 resulted primarily from higher revenues and improved gross margins and overhead leverage.revenues. Net new orders decreased 8%, mainlyincreased by 13% in 2016 due primarily to lower order levels in the Mid-Atlantic due to fewer active communities, offset in part by an increase in ordersactive communities in New England.North and West Florida.

For 2012, Northeast2015, Florida home sale revenues increased 1%11% compared with 20112014 due to a 6% increase in the average selling price, offset in part by a 4% decrease in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred primarily in the Northeast Corridor and Mid-Atlantic, while the decrease in closings was concentrated in the Northeast Corridor and was due to a significant decrease in active communities. The significant increase in income before income taxes was due to moderately improved gross margins and $21.9 million of expense in 2011 related to the write-down of a note receivable and unfavorable resolution of certain contingencies. Net new orders increased 14%, led by our operations in New England.

Southeast:

For 2013, Southeast home sale revenues increased 22% compared with 2012 due to a 12%5% increase in the average selling price combined with a 10% increase in closings. The increase in average selling price was concentrated in Raleigh and Tennessee. The increase in closing volumes was primarily due to increases in Charlotte and Raleigh. The increased income before income taxes was due to the higher revenues and moderately improved gross margins. Net new orders increased 3% in 2013 led by our operations in Raleigh.

For 2012, Southeast home sale revenues increased 2% compared with 2011 due to a 2% increase in the average selling price, partially offset by a 1% decrease in closings. The increase in average selling price was concentrated in Georgia and Tennessee. The decrease in closing volumes was primarily due to a moderate decrease in Raleigh. The increased income before income taxes was due to moderately improved gross margins. Net new orders increased 16% in 2012 and reflected increases across all divisions.

30



Florida:

For 2013, Florida home sale revenues increased 29% compared with 2012 due to a 10% increase in the average selling price and a 17%5% increase in closings. The increase in closings was concentrated in North Florida while the increase in average
selling price occurred in both North and South Florida. The increased income before income taxes for 20132015 resulted from the higher revenues combined with improved gross margins and overhead leverage.revenues. Net new orders decreasedincreased by 6%12% in 20132015 due primarily to feweran increase in active communities in North and West Florida.

Midwest:

For 2012, Florida2016, Midwest home sale revenues increased 11%22% compared with 2011the prior year period due to a 7%15% increase in closings combined with a 6% increase in the average selling price andprice. The higher closing volume led to a 4% increase in closings. The31% increase in income before income taxes. The higher revenues occurred across all markets. Net new orders increased across all markets.

For 2015, Midwest home sale revenues increased 16% compared with the prior year period due to a 15% increase in closings combined with a 2% increase in the average selling price. The increase in closing volumes was driven by our acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014. Partially offsetting this were lower closings in Illinois-St Louis. The increased income before income taxes for 2012 was attributable to significantly improved gross margins and overhead leverage, as well as lower land-related charges.resulted from higher revenues. Net new orders increased by 19%23% in 2012 evenly across North2015 compared with 2014, mainly due to the acquisition of certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes combined with higher orders in Indianapolis-Cleveland and South Florida.Minnesota.

Texas:

For 2013,2016, Texas home sale revenues increased 21%23% compared with the prior year period due to an 8%11% increase in closings combined with a 12%an 11% increase in the average selling price. The increase in closingsaverage selling price was most significant in Houston and Central Texas,broad-based across all markets, while the increase in average selling price wasclosings occurred across all markets with the exception of San Antonio. The higher revenues and higher closings led by our operations in Central Texas and Dallas. Theto increased income before income taxes for 2013 resulted from the higher revenues combined with improved gross margins and overhead leverage.taxes. Net new orders decreased by 13% for 2013 driven mainly by fewer active communities.increased 11% across all markets.

For 2012,2015, Texas home sale revenues increased 8%decreased by 2% compared with the prior year period due to a 5%10% decrease in closings, partially offset by a 10% increase in closings combined with a 3% increase inthe average selling price. These trends were broad-based, though Houston's closings were down 16%, in part due to the impact of lower oil prices on the local economy. In other markets, the lower closings resulted primarily from tight labor resources combined with delays in opening new communities, in part due to challenging weather conditions earlier in the year. The increase in closings was experienced across all markets, but was concentrated in Houston and San Antonio. The increase in average selling price was concentrated in Central Texas and Dallas. The significant increase inlower revenues led to the decreased income before income taxes for 2012 was attributable to moderately improved gross margins and overhead leverage.2015. Net new orders increaseddecreased by 26%9% for 2012 and reflected increases across all divisions.2015, led by a 19% decline in Houston.

North:West:

For 2013, North2016, West home sale revenues increased 23%45% compared with the prior year period due to a 10%29% increase in closings andcombined with a 12%13% increase in the average selling price. The increase in closing volumes was primarily due to significant increases in Michiganincreased closings and Northern California. The increase inincreased average selling price was due to increasesoccurred across all divisions.markets. The increase inincreased income before income taxes resulted from the higher revenues combined with improvedand gross margins in every division.all markets except for Southern California. Net new orders decreasedincreased by 9%15% in 20132016 compared with 2012, mainly2015 due to higher order levels primarily in Las Vegas and Northern California, offset by a slight decrease in Northern California, as we purposely slowed sales pace in a number of communities by raising prices and limiting lot releases.Arizona.

For 2012, North2015, West home sale revenues increased 36%decreased 13% compared with the prior year period due to a 20% increase7% decrease in closings andcombined with a 13% increase6% decrease in the average selling price. The increase in closing volumes was broad-based across all divisions, with the largest increases coming from our Michigandecreased closings and Indianapolis operations. The increase indecreased average selling price occurred at all divisions except Michigan, with the most significant increases in Minnesota andwere driven primarily by the Pacific Northwest.Northwest, Northern California, and Southern California as the result of the timing of our community openings combined with a shift in the mix of closings toward lower priced communities. The substantial increase indecreased income before income taxes as compared with the loss experienced in 2011, was due to the higherresulted from lower revenues, significantly improvedlower gross margins, and higher overhead leverage, a significant reductionas we invested in land-related charges, and gains related to land sale transactions.new communities. Net new orders increased by 39%12% in 20122015 compared with 2011, and reflected moderate to significant increases across all divisions, with the largest increases in Michigan and Northern California.

Southwest:

For 2013, Southwest home sale revenues increased 13% compared with the prior year period due to a 14% increase in average selling price offset by a 1% decrease in closings. The increase in average selling price occurred across all divisions. The decrease in closings was mainly due to decreases in Southern California and Las Vegas. The significant increase in income before income taxes was2014 due to higher revenues and gross margins. Net new orders decreased by 25% in 2013 compared with 2012 primarily due to fewer active communities.

For 2012, Southwest home sale revenues increased 31% compared with the prior year period due to a 22% increase in closings and a 7% increase in average selling price. The increase in average selling price occurred across all divisions. The significant increase in income before income taxes was due to the higher revenues, moderately improved gross margins, and better overhead leverage. In 2011, the Southwest also benefited from land sale gains totaling $15.5 million. Net new orders increased by 33% in 2012 compared with 2011 with significant increasesorder levels across all divisions except Colorado.the Pacific Northwest and Southern California.


31




Financial Services Operations

We conduct our Financial Services operations, which include mortgage and title operations, through Pulte Mortgage and other subsidiaries. In originating mortgage loans, we initially use our own funds, including funds available pursuant to credit agreements with either third parties or with the Company.parties. Substantially all of the loans we originate are sold in the secondary market within a short period of time after origination, generally within 30 days. We also sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the loans and related servicing rights for only a short period of time. Operating as a captive business model primarily targeted to supporting our Homebuilding operations, the business levels of our Financial Services operations are highly correlated to Homebuilding. Our Homebuilding customers continue to account for substantially all loan production. We believe that our capture rate, which represents loan originations from our Homebuilding operations as a percentage of total loan opportunities from our Homebuilding operations, excluding cash closings, is an important metric in evaluating the effectiveness of our captive mortgage business model. The following table presents selected financial information for our Financial Services operations ($000’s omitted):
 
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 FY 2013 vs. FY 2012 2012 FY 2012 vs. FY 2011 20112016 FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 2015 FY 2015 vs. FY 2014 2014
Mortgage operations revenues$113,552
 (17)% $137,443
 65 % $83,260
$142,262
 27% $111,810
 14% $97,787
Title services revenues27,399
 17 % 23,445
 18 % 19,834
38,864
 34% 28,943
 4% 27,851
Total Financial Services revenues140,951
 (12)% 160,888
 56 % 103,094
181,126
 29% 140,753
 12% 125,638
Expenses(a)92,379
 (32)% 135,511
 (2)% 137,666
(108,573) 32% (82,047) 15% (71,057)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated
entities
(137) (26)% (186) 82 % (102)
Income (loss) before income taxes$48,709
 (91)% $25,563
 (174)% $(34,470)
Other income (expense), net531
 % 
 % 
Income before income taxes$73,084
 24% $58,706
 8% $54,581
Total originations:                  
Loans11,818
 4 % 11,322
 19 % 9,482
13,373
 17% 11,435
 6% 10,805
Principal$2,765,509
 10 % $2,509,928
 26 % $1,986,225
$3,706,745
 27% $2,929,531
 10% $2,656,683

(a) Includes loan origination reserve releases of $11.4 million and $18.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Supplemental data:          
Capture rate80.2% 81.9% 78.5%81.2% 82.9% 80.2%
Average FICO score746
 743
 748
750
 749
 749
Loan application backlog$984,754
 $1,178,321
 $583,472
$1,670,160
 $1,310,173
 $980,863
Funded origination breakdown:          
FHA16% 22% 28%
VA11% 12% 13%
USDA3% 3% 2%
Government (FHA, VA, USDA)23% 25% 24%
Other agency67% 61% 56%70% 69% 70%
Total agency97% 98% 99%93% 94% 94%
Non-agency3% 2% 1%7% 6% 6%
Total funded originations100% 100% 100%100% 100% 100%


32



Revenues

Total Financial Services revenues during 2016 increased 29% compared with 2015. The increase resulted from a higher loan origination volume resulting from higher volumes in the Homebuilding segment combined with higher revenues per loan, which were largely attributable to a higher average loan size combined with favorable market conditions. Total Financial Services revenues during 20132015 decreasedincreased 12% compared with 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower revenues per loan resulting from the increased competitiveness in the mortgage industry that occurred in 2013. The decline in revenues per loan more than offset the higher loan origination volume. Interest income, which is included in mortgage operations revenues, was moderately higher in 20132014 than in 2012 due toas the increase in loan originations.

Total Financial Services revenues during 2012 increased 56% compared with 2011 due to a 19% increase in loan origination volumes, an increase in average loan size, and improved loan pricing. The increase in loan origination volumes was due toresult of a higher capture rate and higher Homebuilding closing volumes, and fewer cash sales. Interest income,revenues per loan, which is includedwere attributable to a higher average loan size combined with a modest improvement in loan pricing. The improvement in loan pricing in 2015 resulted primarily from a spike in mortgage operations revenues, was moderately higherindustry refinancing volume in 2012 thanearly 2015, which reduced competitive pricing pressures for new originations. Loan pricing came under more pressure in 2011 due tomore recent months as industry refinancing volume receded. However, the increase in loan originations.overall pricing environment for new originations remains favorable.

In recent years,Since 2007, the mortgage industry has experienced a significant overall tightening of lending standards and a shift toward agency production and fixed rate loans versus adjustableproduction. Adjustable rate mortgages (“ARMs”) and unconventional loans. The substantial majorityaccounted for 5% of funded loan production during 2013, 2012,in 2016 compared with 6% and 2011 consisted of11% in 2015 and 2014, respectively. The shifts in ARM volume contributed to the higher revenues per loan in 2016 and 2015 as ARMs generally contain lower margins. Additionally, fixed rate loans, the majority of which are prime, conforming loans. The shift toward agency fixed-rate loans has contributedmortgages tend to profitability as such loans generally result in higher profitability due tohave higher servicing values and structured guidelines that allow for expense efficiencies when processing the loan. Additionally, historically low interest rates and the challenging regulatory environment has contributed to profitability by reducing the overall level of pricing competition in the market. Recently, however, competition has increased in the industry, partially as the result of the mortgage industry's lower refinancing volume. We expect this increased level of competition, and more challenging pricing environment, to continue for the foreseeable future.values.

Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans sold met certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be faulty, we either repurchase the loanloans from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

In recent years, we experiencedEstimating the required liability for these potential losses requires a significant increase in losses as a result of the high level of loan defaultsmanagement judgment. During 2015 and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. During 2012 and 2011,2014, we recorded additional provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates. Losses related toreduced our loan origination liabilities totaled $49.0by net reserve releases of $11.4 million and $59.3$18.6 million, in 2012 respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests and 2011, respectively, andexisting conditions. Such adjustments are reflected in Financial Services expenses. There were no such losses in 2013. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, changes in values of underlying collateral over time, and the uncertaintyother uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, actual costs could differ from our current estimates. See our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and Note 1312 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

We entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex's mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor of loans originated by Centex. This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex's mortgage operations related to breaches of representations and warranties in the origination of a certain pool of loans. Other than with respect to this pool of loans, our contractual repurchase obligations are limited to our mortgage subsidiaries, which are included in non-guarantor subsidiaries (see Note 14 for a discussion of non-guarantor subsidiaries).

33



The mortgage subsidiary of Centex also sold loans to a bank for inclusion in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBSs”) issued by the bank. In connection with these sales, Centex's mortgage subsidiary entered into agreements pursuant to which it may be required to indemnify the bank for losses incurred by investors in the RMBSs arising out of material errors or omissions in certain information provided by the mortgage subsidiary relating to the loans and loan origination process. In 2011, the bank notified us that it has been named defendant in two lawsuits alleging various violations of federal and state securities laws asserting that untrue statements of material fact were included in the registration statements used to market the sale of two RMBS transactions which included $162 million of loans originated by Centex's mortgage subsidiary. Neither Centex's mortgage subsidiary nor the Company is named as a defendant in these actions. We cannot yet quantify Centex's mortgage subsidiary's potential liability as a result of these indemnification obligations. We do not believe, however, that these matters will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. We are aware of six other RMBS transactions with similar indemnity provisions that include an aggregate $116 million of loans, and we are not aware of any current or threatened legal proceedings regarding those transactions.Statements.

Income before income taxes

The increased income before income taxes for 2016 as compared with 2015 is due to higher origination volume and an increase in revenue per loan combined with better overhead leverage.

The increased income before income taxes for 20132015 as compared with 20122014 wasis due to higher origination volumesvolume and loweran increase in revenue per loan. The increase in expenses over the prior period is largely a result of an increase in headcount caused by the higher origination volume, combined with the impact of changes in loan loss reserves related to loans originated in previous years, partially offset by less favorable loan pricing.

The income before income taxes for 2012 as compared with the loss before income taxes in the prior year period was due to higher origination volumes, improved loan pricing, and lower loss reserves related to loans originated in previous years.discussed above.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is affected by a number of factors, the most significant of which are the valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assetswas 35.5%, 39.5% and changes in our unrecognized tax benefits. Due to the effects of these factors, our31.2% for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The 2016 effective tax rates in 2013, 2012, and 2011 are not correlatedrate differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the amount of ourstate income or loss before income taxes. The income tax benefit for 2013 resulted fromtaxes, the reversal of substantially alla portion of theour valuation allowance related to a legal entity restructuring, the favorable resolution of certain state income tax matters, the impact on our net deferred tax assets whiledue to changes in business operations and state tax laws, and recognition of energy efficient home credits. The 2015 effective tax rate exceeds the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes and the impact of changes in business operations and state tax benefits for 2012 and 2011 resultedlaws to our net deferred tax assets. The 2014 effective tax rate is less than the federal statutory rate primarily fromdue to the reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance related to certain state deferred tax assets, along with the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters.

We evaluate our deferred tax assets each period to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is "more likely than not" that some portion of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. The ultimate realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient taxable income during future periods. We conduct our evaluation by considering all available positive and negative evidence.

Our income tax benefit for 2013 includes $2.1 billion related to the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our deferred tax assets. In the third quarter of 2013, we evaluated the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets and determined that the valuation allowance against substantially all of our federal deferred tax assets and a significant portion of our state deferred tax assets was no longer required. When a change in valuation allowance is recognized in an interim period, a portion of the valuation allowance to be reversed must be allocated to the remaining interim periods. Accordingly, a portion of the remaining valuation allowance was reversed in the fourth quarter of 2013. The components of the valuation allowance remaining at December 31, 2013 relate primarily to state net operating losses that have not met the "more likely than not" realization threshold.

The principal positive evidence that led to the reversal of the valuation allowance in 2013 included: (1) our emergence from a three-year cumulative loss in 2013; (2) the significant positive income we generated during 2012 and 2013, including seven consecutive quarters of pretax income as of December 31, 2013; (3) continued improvements in 2013 over recent years in other key operating metrics, including revenues, gross margin, and overhead leverage; (4) our forecasted future profitability; (5) improvement in our financial position; and (6) significant evidence that conditions in the U.S. housing industry are more favorable than in recent years and our belief that conditions will continue to be favorable over the long-term. The following provides a further summary of the principal evidence considered in 2013:

Recent operating results: We generated significant pretax income in 2012 and 2013. This included generating pretax income in seven consecutive quarters. Excluding asset impairments, we have been profitable in nine out of the last ten quarters. As a result of this improved profitability, we exited a three-year cumulative loss position in 2013, which had been a significant piece of negative evidence prior to 2013.


34



Future operating results: We have a strong backlog of orders that, combined with other factors, provides evidence of our ability to continue to be profitable for 2014 and beyond. Based on detailed projections from each of our business units, we expect pretax earnings growth in the future, even if sales volumes remain at existing levels.

Financial position: We continue to generate significant cash flow from operations and had $1.6 billion of unrestricted cash and equivalents at December 31, 2013. We have used our capital to both invest in our business and reduce our financial leverage. During 2013, we increased our authorized investments in new communities via land acquisition and development, retired significant amounts of debt prior to the stated maturity dates, increased our authorized and actual common share repurchases, and reinstated a common share dividend.

Recovery period for deferred tax assets: For federal income tax purposes, we are allowed to carryforward net operating losses for 20 years and apply such losses to future taxable income to realize our federal deferred tax assets. We believe that we will realize all of our federal net operating losses and will be able to absorb substantially all federal deductible temporary differences as they reverse in future years.

Operating actions taken: We have taken specific actions in recent years to improve our homebuilding operations, including: restructuring our overhead costs to align with current and projected volumes; improving inventory turns, including significant reductions in speculative home inventory; implementation of a robust risk-based portfolio approach to land acquisition approvals; monetization of under performing land assets; enhancing revenues through more strategic pricing, including establishing clear product offerings for each of our targeted consumer groups based on consumer-driven input, expanding the use of house options and lot premiums, and lessening our reliance on speculative home sales; and reducing our house construction costs through common house plan management, value-engineering house plans, and "should costing" our construction costs with our suppliers.

Risk of future asset impairments: The frequency and magnitude of asset impairments has decreased dramatically in recent years as assets have been written-down or sold and as industry conditions have improved. While we remain at risk of future impairments if industry conditions worsen or if our strategy related to certain assets changes, we believe it unlikely that any future asset impairments would be at levels similar to those experienced during the U.S. housing industry downturn.

Sales trends: Our home closings and home sale revenues increased 8% and 19%, respectively, in 2013 compared with 2012. We also have a strong backlog of orders that is amongst the highest in the U.S. homebuilding industry at $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2013. Additionally, the gross margin of orders within our backlog improved significantly from 2012 to 2013. While our net new order units declined 10% in 2013 compared with 2012, this resulted primarily from an expected reduction in the number of our active communities, which are down 14% at December 31, 2013 from December 31, 2012. The reduction in active communities and the lower level of net new orders is consistent with our expectations.

U.S. housing industry outlook: Various housing indices have shown significant improvement in recent periods. U.S. single family new home sales of 306,000 in 2011 were at the lowest level since 1962, a drop of 76% from the 2005 cyclical peak of 1.3 million. In 2013 and 2012, U.S. new home sales increased 16% and 20%, respectively, over the prior year periods. The general consensus among industry analysts is that new home sales will increase significantly in each of the next several years. These forecasts are generally consistent with the 25-year average of approximately 735,000 annual new home sales. New home sales experienced volatility in the second half of 2013 period as consumers adjusted to higher home prices and an increase in mortgage interest rates. While we believe that higher interest rates are inevitable and may have a moderating effect on demand and pricing, we believe this impact will be outweighed by the other factors driving increased sales activity as overall new home sales remain low compared with historical levels. Ultimately, we believe that any sustained rise in interest rates will be indicative of a stronger macroeconomic environment that will support a continued recovery in the homebuilding industry.

After careful evaluation of all available positive and negative evidence, and giving more weight to objectively verifiable evidence over more subjective evidence, we concluded as of September 30, 2013 and again as of December 31, 2013, that it was "more likely than not" that substantially all of our federal deferred tax assets and a significant portion of our state deferred tax assets would be realized. Even if industry conditions weaken from current levels, we believe we will be able to adjust our operations to sustain long-term profitability.


35



Liquidity and Capital Resources

We finance our land acquisition, development, and construction activities and financial services operations by using internally-generated funds supplemented by credit arrangements with third parties and capital market financing. We routinely monitor current and expected operational requirements and financial market conditions to evaluate accessing other available financing sources, including revolving bank credit and securities offerings. Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships, we believe that our operations and borrowing resources are sufficient to provide for our current and foreseeable capital requirements. However, we continue to evaluate the impact of market conditions on our liquidity and may determine that modifications are appropriate.

At December 31, 20132016, we had unrestricted cash and equivalents of $1.6 billion698.9 million and senior notes of $2.1 billion. We also had, restricted cash balances of $72.7$24.4 million,, the substantial majority of which related to cash serving as collateral and $530.9 million available under certain letter ofour revolving credit facilities. Other financing sources include various letter of credit facilities and surety bond arrangements.

facility. We follow a diversified investment approach for our cash and equivalents by maintaining such funds with a diversifiedbroad portfolio of banks within our group of relationship banks in high quality, highly liquid, short-term investments, generally money market fundsdeposits and federal government or agency securities. We monitor our investments with each bank and do not believe our cash and equivalents are exposed to any material risk of loss. However, there can be no assurances that losses of principal balance on our cash and equivalents will not occur.investments.

Our ratio of debt to total capitalization, excluding our Financial Services debt and limited recourse notes payable, was 30.7%40.0% at December 31, 2013, and 8.0% net of cash and equivalents, including restricted cash.2016.

During 2013,Senior unsecured notes

In February 2016, we retired prior to their scheduled maturity dates $461.4 millionissued $1.0 billion of senior notes. We recorded losses related to these transactions totaling $26.9unsecured notes, consisting of $300.0 million. Losses on these transactions included the write-off of unamortized discounts, premiums, and transaction fees and are reflected in other expense, net. During 2012 and 2011, we retired4.25% senior notes due March 1, 2021, and $700.0 million of 5.50% senior notes due March 1, 2026. The net proceeds from this senior notes issuance were used to fund the retirement of $465.2 million of our senior notes that matured in May 2016, with the remaining net proceeds used for general corporate purposes. In July 2016 we issued an additional $1.0 billion of senior unsecured notes, consisting of an additional $400.0 million of the 4.25% senior notes due March 1, 2021, and $600.0 million of 5% senior notes due January 15, 2027. The net proceeds from the July senior notes issuance were used for general corporate purposes and to pay down approximately $500.0 million of outstanding debt, including the remainder of the previously existing term loan facility. The senior notes issued in 2016 are unsecured obligations, and rank equally in right of payment with the existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the Company and each of the guarantors, respectively. The notes are redeemable at our option at any time up to the date of maturity. We retired outstanding debt totaling $592.4$965.2 million, $238.0 million, and $323.9$245.7 million, during 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Credit agreementsRevolving credit facility

We maintain separate cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements with a number of financial institutions. Letters of credit totaling $58.7 million were outstanding under these agreements at December 31, 2013. Under these agreements,In June 2016, we are required to maintain deposits with these financial institutions in amounts approximating the letters of credit outstanding. Such deposits are included in restricted cash.

We also maintainentered into an amended and restated senior unsecured letter ofrevolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) that expiresprovided for an increase in September 2014. This facility permitsour maximum borrowings from $500.0 million to $750.0 million and extended the maturity date from July 2017 to June 2019. The Revolving Credit Facility contains an uncommitted accordion feature that could increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.25 billion, subject to certain conditions and availability of additional bank commitments. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for the issuance of up to $150.0 million of letters of credit for general corporate purposes in supportthat reduce the available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility with a sublimit of any wholly-owned subsidiary. Letters$375.0 million at December 31, 2016. The interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be based on either the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or Base Rate plus an applicable margin, as defined therein. We had no borrowings outstanding and $219.1 million and $191.3 million of letters of credit totaling $124.4 million were outstandingissued under this facilitythe Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 20132016 and 2015, respectively.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum Tangible Net Worth, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, and a maximum Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio (as each term is defined in the Revolving Credit Facility). As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants. Outstanding balances under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our available and unused borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit, amounted to $530.9 million and $308.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Limited recourse notes payable

Certain of our local homebuilding operations maintain limited recourse collateralized notes payable with third parties totaling $19.3 million at December 31, 2016. These notes have maturities ranging up to four years, are collateralized by the applicable land positions to which they relate, have no recourse to any other assets, and are classified within accrued and other liabilities. The stated interest rates on these notes range up to 5.00%.



Pulte Mortgage

Pulte Mortgage provides mortgage financing for the majority of our home closings by utilizing its own funds and funds made available pursuant to credit agreements with third parties or through intercompany borrowings.parties. Pulte Mortgage uses these resources to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market, which generally occurs within 30 days.

Pulte Mortgage maintains a master repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with third party lenders that expires in September 2014. Effective January 2014,lenders. In August 2016, Pulte amended its Repurchase Agreement to extend the effective date to August 2017, and adjusted the maximum aggregate commitment amount according to seasonal borrowing capacity needs. In December 2016, Pulte Mortgage voluntarily reducedagain amended its Repurchase Agreement to increase the maximum aggregate commitment amount to cover seasonal borrowing capacity underneeds. The maximum aggregate commitment was $360.0 million during the Repurchase Agreementseasonally high borrowing period from $150.0December 27, 2016 through January 12, 2017. At all other times, the maximum aggregate commitment ranges from $175.0 million to $99.8 million subject to certain sublimits. We reduced$200.0 million. The purpose of the borrowingchanges in capacity in orderduring the term of the agreement is to lower associated fees during seasonally lowlower volume periods when the additional capacity is unnecessary.of mortgage origination activity. Borrowings under the Repurchase Agreement are secured by residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Pulte Mortgage, including quantitative thresholds related to net worth, net income, and liquidity. At December 31, 2013, Pulte Mortgage had $105.7$331.6 million and $267.9 million outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement at December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and was in compliance with all of its covenants and requirements. While there can be no assurances that the Repurchase Agreement can be renewed or replaced on commercially reasonable terms upon its expiration, we believe we have adequate liquidity to meet Pulte Mortgage's anticipated financing needs.requirements as of such dates.


36



StockShare repurchase programs

In previous years, our Board of Directors authorized and announced a share repurchase program. In July 2013, we increased2016, our common share repurchase authorizationBoard of Directors approved an increase of $1.0 billion to $352.3such authorization. We repurchased 30.9 million, of common shares. In 2013, we repurchased 7.2 21.2 million, and 12.9 million shares under the repurchase authorizationin 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, for a total of $118.1$600.0 million,. There were no repurchases under these programs during 2012 or 2011. Such repurchases are reflected as a reduction of common stock $433.7 million, and retained earnings.$245.8 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. At December 31, 2013,2016, we had remaining authorization to purchase $234.3 millionrepurchase $1.0 billion of common shares.

Dividends

We reinstated ourOur declared quarterly cash dividenddividends totaled $122.2 million, $117.9 million, and $86.4 million in July 2013. During 2013, we declared three cash dividends of $0.05 per common share each.2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Cash flows

Operating activities

Our net cash provided by operating activities in 20132016 was $881.1$68.3 million,, compared with $760.1net cash used in operating activities of $337.6 million in 2015 and $17.3net cash provided by operating activities of $307.9 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.2014. Generally, the primary drivers of our cash flow from operations are profitability and changes in inventory levels. Our positive cash flow from operations for 20132016 was primarily due to income before income taxes of $933.9 million, which was largely offset by a net increase in inventories of $897.1 million as the result of land acquisition and development investment to support future operations as well as more homes under construction as the result of higher production levels. Additionally, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale increased $99.5 million as the result of an increase in loan originations in the month of December compared with the prior year.

Our negative cash flow from operations for 2015 was primarily due to a net increase in inventories of $917.3 million resulting from increased land investment, combined with a net increase in residential mortgage loans available-for-sale of $104.6 million, partially offset by our income before income taxes of $816.0 million.

Our positive cash flow from operations for 2014 was primarily due to our income before income taxes of $527.8$689.8 million, combined with offset by a net decreaseincrease in inventories of $265.1$337.9 million and a reduction of $28.4 millionan increase in residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. The inventory decrease resulted from a reduction in homes in production and lower land inventory consistent with the decline in the numberavailable-for-sale of our active communities.$53.7 million.

Our positive cash flow from operations for 2012 was primarily due to our net income of $206.1 million combined with a net decrease in inventories of $455.2 million. The inventory decrease resulted from lower reinvestment in land inventory combined with a significant reduction in spec homes in production, partially offset by an increase in sold homes in production.

The net losses for 2011 were largely the result of non-cash asset impairments and insurance reserve adjustments, so the cash flows from operations primarily related to changes in working capital. Our positive cash flow from operations in 2011 was primarily the result of a net decrease in inventories combined with income tax refunds, net of payments, of $62.2 million offset by financing Pulte Mortgage's lending operations, which reduced cash flows from operations by $52.8 million in 2011.

Investing activities

Investing activities are generally not a significant source or use of cash for us. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $46.0$471.2 million in 2013,2016, compared with net cash provided by investing activities of $9.7$34.6 million in 20122015 and net cash used$122.6 million in investing activities of $93.6 million in 2011.2014. The use of cash from investing activities in 20132016 was primarily due to $28.9 millionthe acquisition of capital expenditures, a $12.3 million increase in residential mortgage loans held for investment, and acertain real estate assets from Wieland (see Note 1$4.2 million increase in the restricted cash we are required to maintain under our letter of credit facilities.

The positive cash flow from investing activities in 2012 was primarily due to a $28.7 million decrease in the restricted cash we are required to maintain under our letter of credit facilities, which resulted from a reduction in letters of credit outstanding, offset by capital expenditures and investments in unconsolidated entities.).

The use of cash from investing activities for 2011in 2015 was primarily due to $83.2$45.4 million of restrictedcapital expenditures and an $8.6 million increase in residential mortgage loans held for investment.

The use of cash we were required to maintain related to our letter of credit facilities, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment relatedinvesting activities in 2014 was primarily due to the consolidationacquisition of certain facilities.real estate assets from Dominion Homes (see Note 1) and $48.8 million of capital expenditures related primarily to new community openings and the relocation of our corporate headquarters.


37



Financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $350.7 million in 2016, compared with $161.6 million and $529.1 million of net cash used in financing activities was $659.6 million in 2013, compared withduring 2015 and 2014, respectively. The net cash usedprovided by financing activities for 2016 resulted primarily from the proceeds of $448.2the February and July senior unsecured notes issuances for $2.0 billion, offset by the retirement of debt totaling $986.9 million, and $324.0 which included $465.2 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the last three years, we significantly reduced of our outstanding senior notes through a varietythat matured in May 2016 and repayment of transactions, including scheduled maturities, open market repurchases, early redemptions as provided within indenture agreements,our previously outstanding term loan. During 2016, we repurchased 30.9 million common shares for $600.0 million under our repurchase authorization, made payments of $124.7 million for cash dividends, and tender offers. Completionhad net borrowings of these transactions required the use of $479.8 million, $618.8 million, and $321.1 million of cash in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. During 2013, we also repaid $33.1 million of borrowings under the Repurchase Agreement due to the lower balance of mortgages available-for-sale. We borrowed $138.8$63.7 million under the Repurchase Agreement related to a seasonal increase in 2012,residential mortgage loans available-for-sale.

Repayments of debt were $239.2 million and $250.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively, offset by incremental borrowings of $127.6 million and $34.6 million under the year in which it was put in place. During 2011, we used internal funds to finance Pulte Mortgage's operations, the effects of which are reflected in cash flows from operating activities.Repurchase Agreement during 2015 and 2014, respectively. Cash used in financing activities for 2013 also reflects funds used to repurchase common shares and pay dividends, partially2015 was offset by funds provided by$498.1 million of proceeds from the issuanceTerm Loan executed in September 2015, and also includes dividend payments of $116.0 million and the repurchase of common shares under our share repurchase authorization for $442.7 million. Cash used in connection with employee stock option exercises.financing activities in 2014 reflects dividend payments of $75.6 million, and the repurchase of common shares under our share repurchase authorization for $253.0 million.

Inflation

We, and the homebuilding industry in general, may be adversely affected during periods of inflation because of higher land and construction costs. Inflation may also increase our financing costs. In addition, higher mortgage interest rates affect the affordability of our products to prospective homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on to our customers increases in our costs through increased sales prices, market forces may limit our ability to do so. If we are unable to raise sales prices enough to compensate for higher costs, or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, our revenues, gross margins, and net income could be adversely affected.

Seasonality

WeAlthough significant changes in market conditions have impacted our seasonal patterns in the past and could do so again, we historically experience variability in our quarterly results from operations due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding industry. Historically, we have experiencedWe generally experience increases in revenues and cash flow from operations during the fourth quarter based on the timing of home closings.closings. This seasonal activity increases our working capital requirements in our third and fourth quarters to support our home production and loan origination volumes. As a result of the seasonality of our operations, our quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.



Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our payments under contractual obligations as of December 31, 20132016:
 
Payments Due by Period
($000’s omitted)
Payments Due by Period
($000’s omitted)
Total 2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 After 2018Total 2017 2018-2019 2020-2021 After 2021
Contractual obligations:                  
Long-term debt (a)
$3,892,070
 $135,275
 $1,028,120
 $132,378
 $2,596,297
$5,066,941
 $296,587
 $330,750
 $1,015,875
 $3,423,729
Operating lease obligations160,808
 28,116
 48,050
 28,407
 56,235
122,924
 25,349
 42,546
 22,747
 32,282
Other long-term liabilities (b)
7,553
 1,999
 3,294
 2,260
 
21,037
 12,359
 4,485
 4,193
 
Total contractual obligations (c)
$4,060,431
 $165,390
 $1,079,464
 $163,045
 $2,652,532
$5,210,902
 $334,295
 $377,781
 $1,042,815
 $3,456,011

(a)Represents principal and interest payments related to our senior notes.
(b)Represents limited recourse collateralized financing arrangements and related interest payments.
(c)We do not have any payments due in connection with capital lease or long-term purchase obligations.

We are subject to certain obligations associated with entering into contracts (including land option contracts) for the purchase, development, and sale of real estate in the routine conduct of our business. Option contracts for the purchase of land enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether to exercise our option, which may serve to reduce our financial risks associated with long-term land holdings. At December 31, 2013,2016, we had $91.0$195.4 million of deposits and pre-acquisition costs, of which $9.8 million is refundable, relating to option agreements to acquire 28,266 homesites43,979 lots with a remaining purchase price of $1.42.1 billion. We expect to acquire the majority of these lotssuch land within the next two years and the remainder thereafter.


38



At December 31, 2013,2016, we had $173.3$21.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits and $33.1$12.2 million of related accrued interest and penalties. We are currently under examination by various taxing jurisdictions and anticipate finalizing the examinations with certain jurisdictions within the next twelve months. However, theThe final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 20032005 - 2013.2016.

The following table summarizes our other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2013:2016:
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
($000’s omitted)
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
($000’s omitted)
Total 2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 After 2018Total 2017 2018-2019 2020-2021 After 2021
Other commercial commitments:                  
Guarantor credit facilities (a)
$208,699
 $208,699
 $
 $
 $
$750,000
 $
 $750,000
 $
 $
Non-guarantor credit facilities (b)
150,000
 150,000
 
 
 
360,000
 360,000
 
 
 
Total commercial commitments (c)
$358,699
 $358,699
 $
 $
 $
$1,110,000
 $360,000
 $750,000
 $
 $

(a)
$150.0 million of the $208.7The $750.0 million in 20142018-2019 represents the capacity of our unsecured letter ofrevolving credit facility, ofunder which $124.4no borrowings were outstanding, and $219.1 million was outstanding at December 31, 2013, while the remaining $58.7 million in 2014 represents of letters of credit outstanding under our cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements.
were issued at December 31, 2016.
(b)
Represents the capacity of the Repurchase Agreement, of which $105.7$331.6 million was outstanding at December 31, 2013, and2016. The capacity of $360.0 million is effective through January 12, 2017 after which expires in September 2014. Effective January 2014, we voluntarily reduced the capacityit ranges from $150$175.0 million to $99.8 million.
$200.0 million until its expiration in August 2017.
(c)
The above table excludes an aggregate $958.3 million$1.1 billion of surety bonds, which typically do not have stated expiration dates.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use letters of credit and surety bonds to guarantee our performance under various contracts, principally in connection with the development of our homebuilding projects. The expiration dates of the letter of credit contracts coincide with the expected completion date of the related homebuilding projects. If the obligations related to a project are ongoing, annual extensions of the letters of credit are typically granted on a year-to-year basis. At December 31, 20132016, we had outstanding letters of credit of $183.1 million.$219.1 million. Our surety bonds generally do not have stated expiration dates; rather, we are released from the bonds as the contractual performance is completed. These bonds, which approximated $1.01.1 billion at December 31, 20132016, are typically outstanding over a period of approximately three to five years. Because significant construction and development work has been performed related to the applicable projects but has not yet received final acceptance by the respective counterparties, the aggregate amount of surety bonds outstanding is in excess of the projected cost of the remaining work to be performed.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option agreements in order to procure land for the construction of houses in the future. At December 31, 20132016, these agreements had an aggregate remaining purchase price of $1.42.1 billion. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. In certain instances, we are required to record the land under option as if we own it. At December 31, 2013, we recorded assets of $24.0 million as land, not owned, under option agreements.

At December 31, 20132016, aggregate outstanding debt of unconsolidated joint ventures was $12.44.6 million, of which our proportionate share was $4.41.3 million. Of this amount, we provided limited recourse guaranties for $0.8 million at December 31, 2013. See Note 65 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

39




Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. When more than one accounting principle, or the method of its application, is generally accepted, we select the principle or method that is appropriate in our specific circumstances (see Note 1 ofto our Consolidated Financial Statements). Application of these accounting principles requires us to make estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties; as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the consolidated financial statements, giving due regard to materiality.

Revenue recognition

Homebuilding – Homebuilding revenue and related profit are generally recognized when title to and possession of the property are transferred to the buyer. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by Pulte Mortgage, our wholly-owned mortgage subsidiary, and the buyer has not made an adequate initial or continuing investment, the profit on such sale is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed. If there is a loss on the sale of the property, the loss on such sale is recognized at the time of closing.

Financial Services – Mortgage servicing fees represent fees earned for servicing loans for various investors. Servicing fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal balance, or a contracted set fee in the case of certain sub-servicing arrangements, and are credited to income when related mortgage payments are received or the sub-servicing fees are earned. Loan origination fees, commitment fees, and certain direct loan origination costs are recognized as incurred. Expected gains and losses from the sale of residential mortgage loans and their related servicing rights are included in the measurement of written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through Financial Services revenues at the time of commitment.  Subsequent changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in Financial Services revenues as they occur. Interest income is accrued from the date a mortgage loan is originated until the loan is sold. Loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become greater than 90 days past due their contractual terms. Subsequent payments received are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan.

Inventory and cost of revenues

Inventory is stated at cost unless the carrying value is determined to not be recoverable, in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes land acquisition, land development, and home construction costs, including interest, real estate taxes, and certain direct and indirect overhead costs related to development and construction. For those communities for which construction and development activities have been idled, applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred. Land acquisition and development costs are allocated to individual lots using an average lot cost determined based on the total expected land acquisition and development costs and the total expected home closings for the community. The specific identification method is used to accumulate home construction costs.

We capitalize interest cost into homebuilding inventories. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is allocated over the period based on the timing of home closings.

Cost of revenues includes the construction cost, average lot cost, estimated warranty costs, and commissions and closing costs applicable to the home. Sales commissions are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses. The construction cost of the home includes amounts paid through the closing date of the home, plus an appropriate accrual for costs incurred but not yet paid, based on an analysis of budgeted construction costs. This accrual is reviewed for accuracy based on actual payments made after closing compared with the amount accrued, and adjustments are made if needed. Total community land acquisition and development costs are based on an analysis of budgeted costs compared with actual costs incurred to date and estimates to complete. The development cycles for our communities range from under one year to in excess of ten years for certain master planned communities. Adjustments to estimated total land acquisition and development costs for the community affect the amounts costed for the community’s remaining lots.

We record valuation adjustments on landtest inventory for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and when the cash flows estimated to be generated by those assetsthe community are less than theirits carrying amounts. For communitiesamount. Such indicators include gross margins or sales paces significantly below expectations, construction costs or land development costs significantly in excess of budgeted amounts, significant delays or changes in the planned development for the community, and other known qualitative factors. Communities that demonstrate potential impairment indicators ofare tested for impairment we compareby comparing the expected undiscounted cash flows for these communitiesthe


community to theirits carrying value. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, we calculatedetermine the fair value of the community. Impairmentcommunity and impairment charges are required to be recorded if the fair value of the community’s inventory is less than its carrying value.

40




We generally determine the fair value of each community’s inventory using a combination of discounted cash flow models and market comparable transactions, where available. These estimated cash flows are significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices and sale incentives, expected sales paces, and cancellation rates, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs. Such estimates must be made forThe assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models are specific to each individual community and may vary significantly between communities.community. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing, and the long life cycles of many communities, and potential changes in our strategy related to certain communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale

In accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”), we use the fair value option for our residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. Election of the fair value option for residential mortgage loans available-for-sale allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in revenues as they occur.

Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans met certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be faulty, we either repurchase the loan from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

In recent years, we experienced a significant increase inEstimating the required liability for these potential losses related to repurchase requests as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. In 2006 and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excluding loans originated by Centex's former subprime loan business sold by Centex in 2006. Because we generally do not retain the servicing rights to the loans we originate, information regarding the current and historical performance, credit quality, and outstanding balances of such loans is limited. Estimating these loan origination liabilities is further complicated by uncertainties surrounding numerous external factors, such as various macroeconomic factors (including unemployment rates and changes in home prices), actions taken by third parties, including the parties servicing the loans, and the U.S. federal government in its dual capacity as regulator of the U.S. mortgage industry and conservator of the government-sponsored enterprises commonly known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee the majority of mortgage loans in the U.S.

Most requests received to date relate to make-whole payments on loans that have been foreclosed. Requests undergo extensive analysis to confirm the exposure, attempt to cure any identified defect, and, when necessary, determine our liability. We establish liabilities for such anticipated losses based upon, among other things, the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase requests, and the severity of the estimated loss upon repurchase. Determining these estimates and the resulting liability requires a significant level of management judgment. WeDuring 2015 and 2014, we reduced our loan origination liabilities by net reserve releases of $11.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests and existing conditions. Reserves provided (released) are generally able to cure or refute over 60% of the requests received from investors such that we do not believe repurchases or make-whole payments will ultimately be required. For those requests that we believe will resultreflected in repurchases or make-whole payments, actual loss severities are expected to approximate 50% of the outstanding principal balance.

During 2012 and 2011, we recorded provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates.Financial Services expenses. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, our lack of visibility into the current status of the review process of loans by investors, the claim volumes we continue to experience, changes in values of underlying collateral over time, and other uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, actual costs could differ from our current estimates. For example, if the total number of loans we are required to repurchase is ultimately 10% lower or higher than our current estimates, the amount of future losses could decrease or increase by approximately $13.0 million.


41



Intangible assets

We have recorded intangible assets related to tradenames acquired with the Centex merger completed in 2009 and the Del Webb merger completed in 2001, which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives. The carrying values and ultimate realization of these assets are dependent upon estimates of future earnings and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If we determine that the carrying values of intangible assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use a projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine if impairment exists. If the carrying values of the intangible assets exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, then we measure impairment as the difference between the fair value of the asset and the recorded carrying value. To date, no impairments relating to tradenames have been recorded. However, if our expectations of future results and cash flows decrease significantly, or if our strategy related to the use of the intangible assets changes, the related intangible assets may become impaired.

Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home’s construction and operating systems for periods of up to ten years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and the cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liability for each geographic market in which we operate and adjust the amounts as necessary. Actual warranty costs in the future could differ from our estimates.

Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims either through policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries or through our own self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and claims in excess of available insurance policy limits.

Our general liability insurance includes coverage for certain construction defects. While construction defect claims can relate to a variety of circumstances, the majority of our claims relate to alleged problems with siding, plumbing, foundations and other concrete work, windows, roofing, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. The availability of general liability insurance for the homebuilding industry and its subcontractors has become increasingly limited, and the insurance policies available require companies to maintain higher per occurrence and aggregate retention levels. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or to participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by the Company. Policies issued by the captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by the Company. This self-insured exposure is limited by reinsurance policies that we purchase. General liability coverage for the homebuilding industry is complex, and our coverage varies from policy year to policy year. Our insurance coverage requires a per occurrence deductible up to an overall aggregate retention level. Beginning with the first dollar, amounts paid on insured claims satisfy our per occurrence and aggregate retention obligations. Any amounts incurred in excess of the occurrence or aggregate retention levels are covered by insurance up to our purchased coverage levels. Our insurance policies, including the captive insurance subsidiaries' reinsurance policies, are maintained with highly-rated underwriters for whom we believe counterparty default risk is not significant.

At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate an estimate of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims. These estimates are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from our subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable.

42



The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 78% and 74% of the total general liability reserves, which represent the vast majority of the total recorded reserves, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses.

Adjustments to estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. Because the majority of our recorded reserves relates to IBNR, adjustments to reserve amounts for individual existing claims generally do not impact the recorded reserves materially. However, changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and the estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves.

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $668.1 million and $721.3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the vast majority of which relate to general liability claims. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs. Based on the actuarial analyses performed, we believe the range of reasonably possible losses related to these claims is $600 million to $750 million. While this range represents our best estimate of our ultimate liability related to these claims, due to a variety of factors, including those factors described above, there can be no assurance that the ultimate costs realized by us will fall within this range.

Income taxes

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under whichWe evaluate our deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we considereach period to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is more"more likely than notnot" that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets willwould not be realized. The ultimate realization of these deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of futuresufficient taxable income during future periods.  We conduct our evaluation by considering all available positive and negative evidence. This evaluation considers, among other factors, historical operating results, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, and the outlooks for the U.S. housing industry and broader economy. The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between estimated and actual results could result in which those temporary differences become deductible.  In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognizedchanges in the financial statements orvaluation of our deferred tax returns, judgment is required.  Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequencesassets that could have a material impact on theour consolidated results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws could also affect actual tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time.


Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. We follow the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.  Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions. Our evaluations of tax positions consider a variety of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlements of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in income tax expense (benefit) in the period in which the change is made. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a component of income tax expense (benefit).

Self-insured risks

At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and periodically evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate estimates of the ultimate cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims.

Housing market conditions have been volatile across most of our markets over the past ten years, and we believe such conditions can affect the frequency and cost of construction defect claims. Additionally, IBNR estimates comprise the majority of our liability and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. Changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Additionally, the amount of insurance coverage available for each policy period also impacts our recorded reserves. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses and the timing of such losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs.

Adjustments to reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. During 2016 and 2015, we reduced general liability reserves by $55.2 million and $29.6 million, respectively, as a result of changes in estimates resulting from actual claim experience observed being less than anticipated in previous actuarial projections. During 2015, we also recorded a general liability reserve reversal of $32.6 million, resulting from a legal settlement relating to plumbing claims initially reported to us in 2008 and for which our recorded liabilities were adjusted over time based on changes in facts and circumstances. These claims ultimately resulted in a class action lawsuit involving a national vendor and numerous other homebuilders, homebuyers, and insurance companies. In 2015, a global settlement was reached, pursuant to which we funded our agreed upon share of settlement costs, which were significantly lower than our previously estimated exposure. During 2014, we increased general liability insurance reserves by $69.3 million, which was primarily driven by estimated costs associated with siding repairs in certain previously completed communities.

The changes in actuarial estimates in 2016, 2015, and 2014 were driven by changes in actual claims experience that, in turn, impacted actuarial estimates for potential future claims. These changes in actuarial estimates did not involve any changes in actuarial methodology but did impact the development of estimates for future periods, which resulted in adjustments to the IBNR portion of our recorded liabilities.

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $831.1 million and $924.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the vast majority of which relate to general liability claims. The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 70% and 74% of the total general liability reserves at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determine the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs. Based on the actuarial analyses performed, we believe the range of reasonably possible losses related to these claims is $750 million to $975 million. While this range represents our best estimate of our ultimate liability related to these claims, due to a variety of factors, including those factors described above, there can be no assurance that the ultimate costs realized by us will fall within this range.



In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable. Our receivables from insurance carriers totaled $307.3 million and $362.7 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The insurance receivables relate to costs incurred or to be incurred to perform corrective repairs, settle claims with customers, and other costs related to the continued progression of both known and anticipated future construction defect claims that we believe to be insured related to previously closed homes. We believe collection of these insurance receivables is probable based on the legal merits of our positions after review by legal counsel, favorable legal rulings received to date, the credit quality of our carriers, and our long history of collecting significant amounts of insurance reimbursements under similar insurance policies related to similar claims, including significant amounts funded by the above carriers under different policies. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the resolution of such matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.















43




ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to market risk on our debt instruments primarily due to fluctuations in interest rates. We utilize both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. For fixed-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the debt instrument but not our earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable-rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not affect the fair value of the debt instrument but could affect our earnings and cash flows. Except in very limited circumstances, we do not have an obligation to prepay our debt prior to maturity. As a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair value should not have a significant impact on our rate-sensitive financingsfixed-rate debt until we are required or elect to the extent long-term rates decline. refinance or repurchase such debt.

The following tables set forth as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our rate-sensitive financing obligations,the principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted-average interest rates, and estimated fair value of our debt obligations as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 ($000’s omitted).
As of December 31, 2013 for the
Years ending December 31,
As of December 31, 2016 for the
Years ending December 31,
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
Rate-sensitive liabilities:                              
Fixed interest rate debt:               
Senior notes$
 $333,647
 $465,245
 $123,000
 $
 $1,150,000
 $2,071,892
 $2,070,744
Fixed rate debt$134,482
 $
 $3,900
 $3,900
 $700,000
 $2,300,000
 $3,142,282
 $3,131,579
Average interest rate7.12% % 5.00% 5.00% 4.25% 7.19% 5.58%  
               
Variable rate debt (a)
$331,621
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $331,621
 $331,621
Average interest rate% 5.24% 6.50% 7.63% % 6.80% 6.53%  2.89% % % % % % 2.89%  
                              
As of December 31, 2012 for the
Years ending December 31,
As of December 31, 2015 for the
Years ending December 31,
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Fair
Value
Rate-sensitive liabilities:                              
Fixed interest rate debt:               
Senior notes$
 $398,852
 $369,222
 $465,245
 $150,000
 $1,150,000
 $2,533,319
 $2,663,451
Fixed rate debt$487,485
 $128,296
 $
 $3,900
 $3,900
 $1,000,000
 $1,623,581
 $1,678,987
Average interest rate% 5.49% 5.24% 6.50% 7.63% 6.80% 6.36%  6.24% 7.00% % 5.00% 5.00% 6.71% 6.57%  
               
Variable rate debt (a)
$267,877
 $500,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $767,877
 $767,877
Average interest rate2.65% 1.42% % % % % 1.85%  

(a) Includes the Pulte Mortgage Repurchase Agreement and the Term Loan, which was retired in 2016. Does not include our Revolving Credit Facility, under which there were no borrowings outstanding at either December 31, 2016 or 2015.

Derivative instruments and hedging activities

Pulte Mortgage is exposed to market risks from commitments to lend, movements in interest rates, and canceled or modified commitments to lend. A commitment to lend at a specific interest rate (an interest rate lock commitment) is a derivative financial instrument (interest rate is locked to the borrower). The interest rate risk continues through the loan closing and until the loan is sold to an investor. We are generally not exposed to variability in cash flows of derivative instruments for more than approximately 7590 days. In periods of rising interest rates, the length of exposure will generally increase due to customers locking in an interest rate sooner as opposed to letting the interest rate float. In periods of low or decreasing interest rates, the length of exposure will also generally increase as customers desire to lock before the possibility of rising rates.

In order to reduce these risks, we use other derivative financial instruments, principally cash forward placement contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments, to economically hedge the interest rate lock commitment. We generally enter into one of the aforementioned derivative financial instruments upon accepting interest rate lock commitments. Changes in the fair value of interest rate lock commitments and the other derivative financial instruments are recognized in Financial Services revenues. We do not use any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale had an aggregate fair value of $539.5 million and $442.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had aggregate interest rate lock commitments of $273.9 million and $208.2 million, respectively, which were originated at interest rates prevailing at the date of commitment. Unexpired forward contracts totaled $610.0 million and $525.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and


whole loan investor commitments totaled $157.6 million and $77.6 million, respectively, at such dates. Hypothetical changes in the fair values of our financial instruments arising from immediate parallel shifts in long-term mortgage rates of 50, 100, and 150 basis points would not be material to our financial results.results due to the offsetting nature in the movements in fair value of our financial instruments.


44



SPECIAL NOTES CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

As a cautionary note, except for the historical information contained herein, certain matters discussed in Item 7,2, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 7a,3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities, as well as those of the markets we serve or intend to serve, to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate to matters of a strictly factual or historical nature and generally discuss or relate to forecasts, estimates or other expectations regarding future events. Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “project,” “may,” “can,” “could,” “might,” "should", “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, including statements related to expected operating and performing results, planned transactions, planned objectives of management, future developments or conditions in the industries in which we participate and other trends, developments and uncertainties that may affect our business in the future.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among other things: interest rate changes and the availability of mortgage financing; continued volatility in the debt and equity markets; competition within the industries in which we operate; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by us in our homebuilding operations; the impact of any changes to our strategy in responding to the cyclical nature of the industry, including any changes regarding our land positions;positions and the levels of our land spend; the availability and cost of insurance covering risks associated with our businesses; shortages and the cost of labor; weather related slowdowns; slow growth initiatives and/or local building moratoria; governmental regulation directed at or affecting the housing market, the homebuilding industry or construction activities; uncertainty in the mortgage lending industry, including revisions to underwriting standards and repurchase requirements associated with the sale of mortgage loans; the interpretation of or changes to tax, labor and environmental laws; economic changes nationally or in our local markets, including inflation, deflation, changes in consumer confidence and preferences and the state of the market for homes in general; legal or regulatory proceedings or claims; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow in order to successfully implement our capital allocation priorities; required accounting changes; terrorist acts and other acts of war; and other factors of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political, economic, business and competitive nature. See Item 1A – Risk Factors for a further discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties applicable to our businesses. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or changes in our expectations.



45



ITEM 8.      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 20132016 and 20122015
($000’s omitted, except per share data)
 
2013 20122016 2015
ASSETS      
Cash and equivalents$1,580,329
 $1,404,760
$698,882
 $754,161
Restricted cash72,715
 71,950
24,366
 21,274
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash723,248
 775,435
House and land inventory3,978,561
 4,214,046
6,770,655
 5,450,058
Land held for sale61,735
 91,104
31,728
 81,492
Land, not owned, under option agreements24,024
 31,066
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale287,933
 318,931
539,496
 442,715
Investments in unconsolidated entities45,323
 45,629
51,447
 41,267
Other assets460,621
 407,675
857,426
 893,345
Intangible assets136,148
 149,248
154,792
 110,215
Deferred tax assets, net2,086,754
 
1,049,408
 1,394,879
$8,734,143
 $6,734,409
$10,178,200
 $9,189,406
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Liabilities:      
Accounts payable, including book overdrafts of $35,827 and $42,053 in 2013 and 2012, respectively$202,736
 $178,274
Accounts payable, including book overdrafts of $99,690 and $60,547 in 2016 and 2015, respectively$405,455
 $327,725
Customer deposits134,858
 101,183
187,891
 186,141
Accrued and other liabilities1,377,750
 1,418,063
1,448,994
 1,516,783
Income tax liabilities206,015
 198,865
34,860
 57,050
Financial Services debt105,664
 138,795
331,621
 267,877
Term loan
 498,423
Senior notes2,058,168
 2,509,613
3,110,016
 1,576,082
Total liabilities4,085,191
 4,544,793
5,518,837
 4,430,081
Shareholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued$
 $
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 381,299,600 and 386,608,436 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively3,813
 3,866
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued$
 $
Common shares, $0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 319,089,720 and 349,148,351 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively3,191
 3,491
Additional paid-in capital3,052,016
 3,030,889
3,116,490
 3,093,802
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(795) (992)(526) (609)
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)1,593,918
 (844,147)
Retained earnings1,540,208
 1,662,641
Total shareholders’ equity4,648,952
 2,189,616
4,659,363
 4,759,325
$8,734,143
 $6,734,409
$10,178,200
 $9,189,406
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


46




PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Revenues:          
Homebuilding          
Home sale revenues$5,424,309
 $4,552,412
 $3,950,743
$7,451,315
 $5,792,675
 $5,662,171
Land sale revenues114,335
 106,698
 82,853
36,035
 48,536
 34,554
5,538,644
 4,659,110
 4,033,596
7,487,350
 5,841,211
 5,696,725
Financial Services140,951
 160,888
 103,094
181,126
 140,753
 125,638
Total revenues5,679,595
 4,819,998
 4,136,690
7,668,476
 5,981,964
 5,822,363
     
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:          
Home sale cost of revenues4,310,528
 3,833,451
 3,444,398
(5,587,974) (4,235,945) (4,149,674)
Land sale cost of revenues104,426
 94,880
 59,279
(32,115) (35,858) (23,748)
4,414,954
 3,928,331
 3,503,677
(5,620,089) (4,271,803) (4,173,422)
     
Financial Services expenses92,379
 135,511
 137,666
(108,573) (82,047) (71,057)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses568,500
 514,457
 519,583
(957,150) (794,728) (861,390)
Other expense, net80,753
 66,298
 293,102
(48,814) (17,363) (26,736)
Interest income(4,395) (4,913) (5,055)
Interest expense712
 819
 1,313
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities(1,130) (4,059) (3,296)
Income (loss) before income taxes527,822
 183,554
 (310,300)
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,092,294) (22,591) (99,912)
Net income (loss)$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)
Income before income taxes933,850
 816,023
 689,758
Income tax expense(331,147) (321,933) (215,420)
Net income$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
     
 
 
Net income (loss) per share:     
Net income per share:     
Basic$6.79
 $0.54
 $(0.55)$1.76
 $1.38
 $1.27
Diluted$6.72
 $0.54
 $(0.55)$1.75
 $1.36
 $1.26
Cash dividends declared$0.15
 $
 $
$0.36
 $0.33
 $0.23
          
Number of shares used in calculation:          
Basic383,077
 381,562
 379,877
339,747
 356,576
 370,377
Effect of dilutive securities3,789
 3,002
 
2,376
 3,217
 3,725
Diluted386,866
 384,564
 379,877
342,123
 359,793
 374,102









See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

47




PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the years ended December 31, 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014
(000’s omitted)
 

 2013 2012 2011
Net income (loss)$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)
      
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:     
Change in fair value of derivatives197
 314
 213
Other comprehensive income197
 314
 213
      
Comprehensive income (loss)$2,620,313
 $206,459
 $(210,175)
 2016 2015 2014
Net income$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
      
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:     
Change in value of derivatives83
 81
 105
Other comprehensive income83
 81
 105
      
Comprehensive income$602,786
 $494,171
 $474,443




See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.




48




PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014
(000’s omitted, except per share data)

 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 Total
Shares $ 
Shareholders' Equity, January 1, 2011382,028
 $3,820
 $2,972,919
 $(1,519) $(840,053) $2,135,167
Stock option exercises

 

 

 
 
 
Stock awards, net of cancellations944
 10
 (10) 
 
 
Stock repurchases(364) (4) (3,128) 
 296
 (2,836)
Stock-based compensation
 
 16,459
 
 
 16,459
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 (210,388) (210,388)
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 213
 
 213
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2011382,608
 $3,826
 $2,986,240
 $(1,306) $(1,050,145) $1,938,615
Stock option exercises2,877
 29
 32,780
 
 
 32,809
Stock awards, net of cancellations1,228
 12
 (12) 
 
 
Stock repurchases(105) (1) (813) 
 (147) (961)
Stock-based compensation
 
 12,694
 
 
 12,694
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 206,145
 206,145
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 314
 
 314
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2012386,608
 $3,866
 $3,030,889
 $(992) $(844,147) $2,189,616
Stock option exercises1,432
 14
 19,397
 
 
 19,411
Stock awards, net of cancellations1,002
 10
 (10) 
 
 
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (57,530) (57,530)
Stock repurchases(7,742) (77) (3,063) 
 (124,521) (127,661)
Stock-based compensation
 

 14,474
 
 
 14,474
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from stock-based compensation
 
 (9,671) 
 
 (9,671)
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 2,620,116
 2,620,116
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 197
 
 197
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2013381,300
 $3,813
 $3,052,016
 $(795) $1,593,918
 $4,648,952
 Common Shares 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 Total
Shares $ 
Shareholders' Equity, January 1, 2014381,300
 $3,813
 $3,052,016
 $(795) $1,593,918
 $4,648,952
Stock option exercises1,422
 14
 15,613
 
 
 15,627
Share issuances, net of cancellations(43) 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared
 
 72
 
 (86,442) (86,370)
Share repurchases(13,220) (132) 
 
 (252,887) (253,019)
Share-based compensation
 
 13,786
 
 26
 13,812
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (8,491) 
 
 (8,491)
Net income
 
 
 
 474,338
 474,338
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 105
 
 105
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2014369,459
 $3,695
 $3,072,996
 $(690) $1,728,953
 $4,804,954
Stock option exercises904
 9
 10,525
 
 
 10,534
Share issuances, net of cancellations428
 4
 7,420
 
 

 7,424
Dividends declared
 
 8
 
 (117,881) (117,873)
Share repurchases(21,642) (217) 
 
 (442,521) (442,738)
Share-based compensation
 
 16,888
 
 
 16,888
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (14,035) 
 
 (14,035)
Net income
 
 
 
 494,090
 494,090
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 81
 
 81
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2015349,149
 $3,491
 $3,093,802
 $(609) $1,662,641
 $4,759,325
Stock option exercises498
 5
 5,840
 
 
 5,845
Share issuances, net of cancellations530
 5
 8,851
 
 
 8,856
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (122,240) (122,240)
Share repurchases(31,087) (310) 
 
 (602,896) (603,206)
Share-based compensation
 
 18,626
 
 
 18,626
Excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from share-based compensation
 
 (10,629) 
 
 (10,629)
Net income
 
 
 
 602,703
 602,703
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 83
 
 83
Shareholders' Equity, December 31, 2016319,090
 $3,191
 $3,116,490
 $(526) $1,540,208
 $4,659,363
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

49




PULTEGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014
($000’s omitted)
 2013 2012 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income (loss)$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in)
      operating activities:
     
Deferred income taxes(2,096,425) 
 
Write-down of land and deposits and pre-acquisition costs9,672
 17,195
 35,786
Goodwill impairments
 
 240,541
Depreciation and amortization31,587
 30,027
 32,098
Stock-based compensation expense30,480
 22,897
 16,970
Loss on debt retirements26,930
 32,071
 5,638
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities(1,130) (4,059) (3,296)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities2,049
 7,488
 7,083
Other non-cash, net9,375
 10,356
 12,188
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:     
Restricted cash3,387
 1,257
 5,940
Inventories265,064
 455,223
 54,891
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale28,448
 (60,828) (82,113)
Other assets(38,190) 26,014
 182,471
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities(17,377) 20,802
 (189,435)
Income tax liabilities7,150
 (4,448) (91,095)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities881,136
 760,140
 17,279
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Distributions from unconsolidated entities1,001
 3,029
 4,531
Investments in unconsolidated entities(1,677) (16,456) (4,603)
Net change in loans held for investment(12,265) 836
 325
Change in restricted cash related to letters of credit(4,152) 28,653
 (83,199)
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment15
 7,586
 10,555
Capital expenditures(28,899) (13,942) (21,238)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(45,977) 9,706
 (93,629)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Financial Services borrowings (repayments)(33,131) 138,795
 
Other borrowings (repayments)(479,827) (618,800) (321,133)
Stock option exercises19,411
 32,809
 
Stock repurchases(127,661) (961) (2,836)
Dividends paid(38,382) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(659,590) (448,157) (323,969)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents175,569
 321,689
 (400,319)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period1,404,760
 1,083,071
 1,483,390
Cash and equivalents at end of period$1,580,329
 $1,404,760
 $1,083,071
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Interest paid (capitalized), net$(171) $(1,470) $(9,623)
Income taxes paid (refunded), net$373
 $(13,322) $(62,167)
 2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:     
Deferred income tax expense334,787
 311,699
 223,769
Write-down of land and deposits and pre-acquisition costs19,357
 11,467
 11,168
Depreciation and amortization54,007
 46,222
 39,864
Share-based compensation expense22,228
 24,752
 29,292
Loss on debt retirements657
 
 8,584
Other, net1,614
 (4,865) (2,566)
Increase (decrease) in cash due to:     
Inventories(897,092) (917,298) (337,939)
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale(99,527) (104,609) (53,734)
Other assets(45,721) (175,150) (46,249)
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities75,257
 (23,898) (38,646)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities68,270
 (337,590) 307,881
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(39,295) (45,440) (48,790)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries(14,539) (454) (9)
Cash used for business acquisition(430,458) 
 (82,419)
Other investing activities, net13,100
 11,330
 8,605
Net cash used in investing activities(471,192) (34,564) (122,613)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from debt issuance1,995,937
 498,087
 
Repayments of debt(986,919) (239,193) (250,631)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility619,000
 125,000
 
Repayments under revolving credit facility(619,000) (125,000) 
Financial Services borrowings63,744
 127,636
 34,577
Stock option exercises5,845
 10,535
 15,627
Share repurchases(603,206) (442,738) (253,019)
Dividends paid(124,666) (115,958) (75,646)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities350,735
 (161,631) (529,092)
Net increase (decrease)(52,187) (533,785) (343,824)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period775,435
 1,309,220
 1,653,044
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$723,248
 $775,435
 $1,309,220
      
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:     
Interest paid (capitalized), net$(26,538) $(4,193) $(4,561)
Income taxes paid (refunded), net$2,743
 $(5,654) $1,030
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

50




PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

1. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

PulteGroup, Inc. is one of the largest homebuilders in the U.S., and our common stock tradesshares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “PHM”. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "PulteGroup", the "Company", "we", "us", and "our" used herein refer to PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries. While our subsidiaries engage primarily in the homebuilding business, we also have mortgage banking operations, conducted principally through Pulte Mortgage LLC (“Pulte Mortgage”), and title operations.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of PulteGroup, Inc. and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and variable interest entities in which PulteGroup, Inc. is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts, transactions, and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business acquisitions

We acquired substantially all of the assets of JW Homes ("Wieland") in January 2016, for $430.5 million in cash and the assumption of certain payables related to such assets. The acquired net assets were located in Atlanta, Charleston, Charlotte, Nashville, and Raleigh, and included approximately 7,000 lots, including 375 homes in inventory, and control of approximately 1,300 lots through land option contracts. We also assumed a sales order backlog of 317 homes. The acquired net assets were recorded at their estimated fair values and resulted in goodwill of $40.4 million and separately identifiable intangible assets of $18.0 million comprised of the John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods tradename, which is being amortized over a 20-year life. The acquisition of these assets was not material to our results of operations or financial condition.

We acquired certain real estate assets from Dominion Homes in August 2014 for $82.4 million in cash and the assumption of certain payables related to such assets. The net assets acquired were located primarily in Columbus, Ohio, and Louisville, Kentucky, and included approximately 8,200 lots, including approximately 400 homes in inventory and control of approximately 900 lots through land option contracts. We also assumed a sales order backlog of 622 homes. The acquired net assets were recorded at their estimated fair values. The acquisition of these assets was not material to our results of operations or financial condition.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

In January 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest,” which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet from an asset to a direct reduction of the carrying amount of the related debt. The adoption of this guidance resulted in the reclassification of applicable unamortized debt issuance costs from other assets to senior notes and term loan. See Note 6.

In December 2016, we early adopted ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” that requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
Effective with our fourth quarter 2016 reporting, we reclassified our unbilled insurance receivables to other assets from accrued and other liabilities. Additionally, we reclassified sales commissions expense from home sale cost of revenues to selling, general, and administrative expenses in order to be more consistent with a majority of our peers. This

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


had the effect of reducing home sale cost of revenues while increasing selling, general, and administrative expenses by the amount of sales commissions, which totaled $268.3 million, $204.9 million, and $193.6 million, or 3.6 percent, 3.5 percent, and 3.4 percent of home sale revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

All prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Subsequent events

We evaluated subsequent events up until the time the financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

Cash and equivalents

Cash and equivalents include institutional money market investments and time deposits with a maturity of three months or less when acquired. Cash and equivalents at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 also included $3.7$66.5 million and $8.127.5 million, respectively, of cash from home closings held in escrow for our benefit, typically for less than five days, which are considered deposits in-transit.

Restricted cash

We maintain certain cash balances that are restricted as to their use. Restricted cash consists primarily of deposits maintained with financial institutions under certain cash-collateralized letter of credit agreements (see Note 7). The remaining balances relate to certain other accounts with restrictions,use, including customer deposits on home sales that are temporarily restricted by regulatory requirements until title transfers to the homebuyer. Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash includes restricted cash balances of $24.4 million and $21.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Investments in unconsolidated entities

We have investments in a number of unconsolidated entities, including joint ventures, with independent third parties. Some of these unconsolidated entities purchase, develop, and/or sell land and homes. The equity method of accounting is used for unconsolidated entities over which we have significant influence; generally this represents ownership interests of at least 20% and not more than 50%. Under the equity method of accounting, we recognize our proportionate share of the profitsearnings and losses of these entities. Certain of these entities sell land to us. In these situations, weWe defer the recognition of profits from such activities until the time we ultimately sell the related homes are sold. The cost method of accounting is used for investments in which we have less than a 20% ownership interest and do not have the ability to exercise significant influence.land.


51


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated entities for recoverability in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 323, “Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures” (“ASC 323”). If we determine that a loss in the value of the investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded to equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, each unconsolidated entity evaluates its long-lived assets, such as inventory, for recoverability in accordance with ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment – Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“ASC 360-10”). Our proportionate share of any such impairments is also recorded to equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Evaluations of recoverability under both ASC 323 and ASC 360-10 are primarily based on projected cash flows.entities. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and the significant volatility in demand for new housing, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. See Note 65.

Notes receivable

In certain instances, we may accept consideration for land sales or other transactions in the form of a note receivable. Such receivables are reported net of allowance for credit losses within other assets. The following represents our notes receivable and related allowance for credit losses ($000’s omitted):
 December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
Notes receivable, gross$59,995
 $57,841
Allowance for credit losses(27,051) (26,865)
Notes receivable, net$32,944
 $30,976

We also record other receivables from various parties in the normal course of business, including amounts due from municipalities, insurance companies, and vendors. Such receivables are generally reported in other assets. See Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale in Note 1 for a discussion of our receivables related to mortgage operations.

Intangible assets

Goodwill, which represents the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the net assets of such businesses at the acquisition date, was recorded as the result of the Wieland acquisition and totaled $40.4 million at December 31, 2016. We assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Intangible assets consist ofalso includes tradenames acquired in connection with the 2016 acquisition of Wieland, the 2009 acquisition of Centex Corporation ("Centex"), and the 2001 acquisition of Del Webb Corporation, ("Del Webb"). These intangible assets were valued at the acquisition date andall of which are being amortized over 20-year lives. The acquired cost and accumulated amortization of our intangible assetstradenames were $259.0$277.0 million and $122.9$162.6 million,, respectively, at December 31, 2013,2016, and $259.0$259.0 million and $109.8$148.8 million,, respectively, at December 31, 2012.2015. Amortization expense totaled $13.1$13.8 million, $12.9 million and $13.0 million in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014, respectively, and is expected to be $13.1$13.8 million in each of the next five years.

The ultimate realization of these assets is dependent upon estimates ofthe future earningscash flows and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If we determine thatWe assess tradenames for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values of intangible assetsamount may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use a projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine if impairment exists. If the carrying values of the intangible assets exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, then we measure impairment as the difference between the fair value of the asset and the recorded carrying value. There were recoverable.no impairments of tradenames during 2013, 2012, or 2011.


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Property and equipment, net, and depreciation

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives as follows: model home furniture - two years; office furniture and equipment - three to ten years; and leasehold improvements - life of the lease. Property and equipment are included in other assets and totaled $53.1$77.4 million net of accumulated depreciation of $182.0$192.9 million at December 31, 20132016 and $44.2$86.3 million net of accumulated depreciation of $190.1$185.8 million at December 31, 2012.2015. Depreciation expense totaled $18.5$40.2 million,, $16.9 $33.3 million,, and $19.0$26.8 million in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.

Advertising costs

Advertising costs are expensed to selling, general, and administrative expense as incurred and totaled $42.4$50.7 million,, $45.8 $45.3 million,, and $55.1$41.8 million,, in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.

52


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Employee benefits

We maintain defined contribution retirement plans that cover substantially all of our employees. Company contributions to these plans were suspended during 2011 but reinstated in 2012. Company contributions pursuant to the plans totaled $11.0$14.6 million, $12.6 million, and $9.4$12.1 million in 20132016, 2015, and 20122014, respectively.

Other expense, net

Other expense, net consists of the following ($000’s omitted): 
 2013 2012 2011
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 4)
$3,122
 $2,278
 $10,002
Loss on debt retirements (Note 7)
26,930
 32,071
 5,638
Lease exit and related costs2,778
 7,306
 9,900
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,100
 13,100
 13,100
Goodwill impairments (Note 2)

 
 240,541
Miscellaneous expense (income), net (a)
34,823
 11,543
 13,921
 $80,753
 $66,298
 $293,102
 2016 2015 2014
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 3)
$17,157
 $5,021
 $6,099
Loss on debt retirements (Note 6)
657
 
 8,584
Lease exit and related costs (a)
11,643
 2,463
 9,609
Amortization of intangible assets (Note 1)
13,800
 12,900
 13,033
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (Note 5)
(8,337) (7,355) (8,226)
Interest income(3,236) (3,107) (4,632)
Interest expense686
 788
 849
Miscellaneous, net (b)
16,444
 6,653
 1,420
Total other expense, net$48,814
 $17,363
 $26,736

(a)
Includes chargesLease exit and related costs for 2016 resulted from actions taken to reduce overheads and the substantial completion of $41.2 millionour corporate headquarters relocation from Michigan to Georgia, which began in 2013 (see Note 22013). Costs for 2015 and 2014 are primarily attributable to those same relocation efforts.
(b)
resulting fromMiscellaneous, net includes a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community (seeNote 13) and $5.1 million in 2012 and $17.1charge of $15.0 million in 20112016 related to the write-downsettlement of notes receivable.a disputed land transaction and a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12).

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders (the “Numerator”) by the weighted-average number of common shares, adjusted for unvested shares, of restricted stock (the “Denominator”) for the period. Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that the Denominator is increased to include the dilutive effects of stock options, unvested restricted stock,shares and share units, and other potentially dilutive instruments. Any stock options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price of our common shares are considered to be anti-dilutive and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. Our earnings per share excludes 9.6excluded 1.8 million, 3.9 million, and 16.66.6 million stock options and other potentially dilutive instruments in 20132016, 2015, and 20122014, respectively. All stock options, unvested restricted stock, and other potentially dilutive instruments were excluded from the calculation during 2011 due to the net loss recorded during the period.

In accordance with ASC 260 "Earnings Per Share" ("ASC 260"), the two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stockshare and participating securities according to an earnings allocation formula that adjusts the Numerator for dividends or dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and, therefore, are included in computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company'sOur outstanding restricted stock

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


share awards, restricted share units, and deferred shares are considered participating securities. The following table presents the earnings per common share of common stock ($000's(000's omitted, except per share data):



53


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014
Numerator:          
Net income$2,620,116
 $206,145
 $(210,388)$602,703
 $494,090
 $474,338
Less: earnings distributed to participating securities(407) 
 
(1,100) (755) (583)
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(19,201) 
 
(3,622) (2,448) (2,668)
Numerator for basic earnings per share$2,600,508
 $206,145
 $(210,388)$597,981
 $490,887
 $471,087
Add back: undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities19,201
 
 
3,622
 2,448
 2,668
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to participating securities(18,845) 
 
(3,602) (2,429) (2,643)
Numerator for diluted earnings per share$2,600,864
 $206,145
 $(210,388)$598,001
 $490,906
 $471,112
          
Denominator:          
Basic shares outstanding383,077
 381,562
 379,877
339,747
 356,576
 370,377
Effect of dilutive securities3,789
 3,002
 
2,376
 3,217
 3,725
Diluted shares outstanding386,866
 384,564
 379,877
342,123
 359,793
 374,102
          
Earnings per share:          
Basic$6.79
 $0.54
 $(0.55)$1.76
 $1.38
 $1.27
Diluted$6.72
 $0.54
 $(0.55)$1.75
 $1.36
 $1.26

 Stock-basedShare-based compensation

We measure compensation cost for restricted stockshares and restricted stockshare units at fair value on the grant date. Fair value is determined based on the quoted price of our common stockshares on the grant date. We recognize compensation expense for restricted stockshares and restricted stockshare units, the majority of which cliff vest at the end of three years, ratably over the vesting period. For share-based awards containing performance conditions, we recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period when it is probable that the stated performance targets will be achieved and record cumulative adjustments in the period in which estimates change. We measure compensation cost for stock options at fair value on the grant date and recognize compensation expense on the graded vesting method over the vesting period. The graded vesting method provides for vesting of portions of the overall awards at interim dates and results in greater expense in earlier years than the straight-line method. The fair value of our stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Compensation expense related to our share-based awards is included in selling, general, and administrative expense, except for a small portion recognized in Financial Services expenses. See Note 98.

Income taxes

The provision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by identifying the temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.income. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, judgment is required. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on theour consolidated results of operations or financial position.
    

54


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. We follow the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which prescribes a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions. Our evaluations

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


of tax positions consider a variety of factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in law, correspondence with taxing authorities, and effective settlements of audit issues. Changes in the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions could result in material increases or decreases in income tax expense (benefit) in the period in which the change is made. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a component of income tax expense (benefit). See Note 109.

Homebuilding revenue recognition

Homebuilding revenue and related profit are generally recognized when title to and possession of the property are transferred to the buyer. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by Pulte Mortgage and the buyer has not made an adequate initial or continuing investment, the profit on such sale is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed. If there is a loss on the sale of the property, the loss on such sale is recognized at the time of closing. The amount of such deferred profits werewas not material at either December 31, 20132016 or December 31, 2012.2015.

Sales incentives

When sales incentives involve a discount on the selling price of the home, we record the discount as a reduction of revenue at the time of house closing. If the sales incentive requires us to provide a free product or service to the customer, the cost of the free product or service is recorded as cost of revenues at the time of house closing. This includes the cost related to optional upgrades and seller-paid financing costs, closing costs, homeowners’ association fees, or merchandise.

Inventory and cost of revenues

Inventory is stated at cost unless the carrying value is determined to not be recoverable, in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes land acquisition, land development, and home construction costs, including interest, real estate taxes, and certain direct and indirect overhead costs related to development and construction. For those communities for which construction and development activities have been idled, applicable interest and real estate taxes are expensed as incurred. Land acquisition and development costs are allocated to individual lots using an average lot cost determined based on the total expected land acquisition and development costs and the total expected home closings for the community. The specific identification method is used to accumulate home construction costs.

We capitalize interest cost into homebuilding inventories. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is allocated over the period based on the timing of home closings.

Cost of revenues includes the construction cost, average lot cost, estimated warranty costs, and commissions and closing costs applicable to the home. Sales commissions are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses. The construction cost of the home includes amounts paid through the closing date of the home, plus an appropriate accrual for costs incurred but not yet paid, based on an analysis of budgeted construction costs. This accrual is reviewed for accuracy based on actual payments made after closing compared with the amount accrued, and adjustments are made if needed.paid. Total community land acquisition and development costs are based on an analysis of budgeted costs compared with actual costs incurred to date and estimates to complete. The development cycles for our communities range from under one year to in excess of ten years for certain master planned communities. Adjustments to estimated total land acquisition and development costs for the community affect the amounts costed for the community’s remaining lots.


55


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


We record valuation adjustments on landtest inventory for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the related community may be impaired and when the cash flows estimated to be generated by the community are less than its carrying amount. Such indicators include gross marginmargins or sales paces significantly below expectations, construction costs or land development costs significantly in excess of budgeted amounts, significant delays or changes in the planned development for the community, and other known qualitative factors. Communities that demonstrate potential impairment indicators are tested for impairment by comparing the expected undiscounted cash flows for the community to its carrying value. For those communities whose carrying values exceed the expected undiscounted cash flows, we estimate the fair value of the community. Impairmentcommunity, and impairment charges are recorded if the fair value of the community's inventory is less than its carrying value.

We generally determine the fair value of a community's inventory using a combination of market comparable land transactions, where available, and discounted cash flow models.models and market comparable transactions, where available. These estimated cash flows are significantly impacted by estimates related to expected average selling prices, expected sales paces, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models are specific to each community. Our evaluations for impairments are based on our best estimates of the future cash flows

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


for our communities. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing, and the long life cycles of many communities, and potential changes in our strategy related to certain communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates. See Note 43.

 Land held for sale

We periodically elect to sell parcels of land to third parties in the event such assets no longer fit into our strategic operating plans or are zoned for commercial or other development. Land held for sale is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. In determining the value of land held for sale, we consider recent offers received, prices for land in recent comparable sales transactions, and other factors. We record net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale within Homebuilding land sale cost of revenues. See Note 43.

Land option agreements

In the ordinary course of business, weWe enter into land option agreements in order to procure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such contracts enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties or unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether and when to exercise our option, which reduces our financial risks associated with long-term land holdings. Option deposits and pre-acquisition costs (such as environmental testing, surveys, engineering, and entitlement costs) are capitalized if the costs are directly identifiable with the land under option, the costs would be capitalized if we owned the land, and acquisition of the property is probable. Such costs are reflected in other assets and are reclassified to inventory upon taking title to the land. We write off deposits and pre-acquisition costs when it becomes probable that we will not go forward with the project or recover the capitalized costs. Such decisions take into consideration changes in local market conditions, the timing of required land purchases, the availability and best use of necessary incremental capital, and other factors. We record any such write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs within other expense, net.  See Note 43.

If thean entity holding the land under option is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), our deposit represents a variable interest in that entity. IfNo VIEs required consolidation at either December 31, 2016 or 2015 because we are determined to bethat we were not the primary beneficiary of the VIE, we are required to consolidate the VIE. Certain of our land option agreements are with entities considered VIEs. In evaluating whether we are required to consolidate a VIE, we take into consideration that the VIE is generally protected from the first dollar of loss under our land option agreement due to our deposit. Likewise, the VIE's gains are generally capped based on the purchase price within the land option agreement. However, we generally have little control or influence over the operations of these VIEs due to our lack of an equity interest in them. Additionally, creditors of the VIE typically have no recourse against us, and we do not provide financial or other support to these VIEs other than as stipulated in the land option agreements.beneficiary. Our maximum exposure to loss related to these VIEs is generally limited to our deposits and pre-acquisition costs under the applicable land option agreements. Historically, cancellations of land option agreements have resulted in write-offs of the related deposits and pre-acquisition costs but have not exposed us to the overall risks or losses of the applicable VIEs. No VIEs required consolidation at either December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.


56


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Separately, certain land option agreements represent financing arrangements even though we generally have no obligation to pay these future amounts. As a result, we recorded $24.0 million and $31.1 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, to land, not owned, under option agreements with a corresponding increase to accrued and other liabilities. Such amounts represent the remaining purchase price under the land option agreements, some of which are with VIEs, in the event we exercise the purchase rights under the agreements.

The following provides a summary of our interests in land option agreements ($000’s omitted):
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Land, Not
Owned,
Under
Option
Agreements
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Land, Not
Owned,
Under
Option
Agreements
Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
 Deposits and
Pre-acquisition
Costs
 Remaining Purchase
Price
Land options with VIEs$40,486
 $661,158
 $8,167
 $29,294
 $369,085
 $8,590
$68,527
 $849,901
 $77,641
 $1,064,506
Other land options50,548
 729,128
 15,857
 40,822
 554,307
 22,476
126,909
 1,252,662
 84,478
 981,687
$91,034
 $1,390,286
 $24,024
 $70,116
 $923,392
 $31,066
$195,436
 $2,102,563
 $162,119
 $2,046,193

Start-up costs

Costs and expenses associated with opening new communities are expensed whento selling, general, and administrative expenses as incurred.

Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects.defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home's construction and operating systems for periods of up to 10 years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the product revenue is recognized.


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require the majority of our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for certain construction defects. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims, subject to certain self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and available policy limits. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims. We reserve for these costs on an undiscounted basis at the time product revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims, which include estimates of claims incurred but not yet reported. Adjustments to estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from our subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable. See Note 1312.

Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale

Substantially all of the loans originated by us and their related servicing rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time after origination, generally within 30 days. In accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”), we use the fair value option to record residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. Election of the fair value option for these loans allows a better offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. We do not designate any derivative instruments as hedges or apply the hedge accounting provisions of ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” See Note 1312 for discussion of the risks retained related to mortgage loan originations. 


57


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Expected gains and losses from the sale of residential mortgage loans and their related servicing rights are included in the measurement of written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through Financial Services revenues at the time of commitment.  Subsequent changes in the fair value of these loans are reflected in Financial Services revenues as they occur. At December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, residential mortgage loans available-for-sale had an aggregate fair value of $287.9$539.5 million and $318.9$442.7 million,, respectively, and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $278.1$529.7 million and $305.3$429.6 million,, respectively. The net gain (loss) resulting from changes in fair value of these loans totaled $(1.2)$2.8 million and $(0.2)$(0.3) million for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. These changes in fair value were substantially offset by changes in fair value of the corresponding hedging instruments. Net gains from the sale of mortgages during 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014 were $80.3$109.6 million,, $109.2 $80.8 million,, and $59.1$67.2 million,, respectively, and have been included in Financial Services revenues.

Mortgage servicing rights

We sell the servicing rights for the loans we originate through fixed price servicing sales contracts to reduce the risks and costs inherent in servicing loans. This strategy results in owning the servicing rights for only a short period of time. We recognize the fair value of our rights to service a mortgage loan as revenue at the time of entering into an interest rate lock commitment with a borrower. Due to the short period of time the servicing rights are held, we do not amortize the servicing asset. The servicing sales contracts provide for the reimbursement of payments made by the purchaser if loans prepay within specified periods of time, generally within 90 to 120 days after sale. We establish reserves for this liability at the time the sale is recorded. Such reserves were immaterial at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 and are included in accrued and other liabilities..

Loans held for investment

We maintain a portfolio of loans that either have been repurchased from investors or were not saleable upon closing. We have the intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. These loans are carried at cost and are reviewed annually for impairment, or when recoverability becomes doubtful. Loans held for investment are included in other assets and totaled $11.0$8.4 million and $1.37.6 million at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, respectively.

Interest income on mortgage loans

Interest income on mortgage loans is recorded in Financial Services revenues, accrued from the date a mortgage loan is originated until the loan is sold, and totaled $7.58.0 million, $6.06.9 million, and $5.07.2 million in 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014, respectively. Loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become greater than 90 days past due their contractual

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


terms. Subsequent payments received are applied according to the contractual terms of the loan. Mortgage discounts are not amortized as interest income due to the short period the loans are held until sale to third party investors.

Mortgage servicing, origination, and commitment fees

Mortgage servicing fees represent fees earned for servicing loans for various investors. Servicing fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal balance, or a contracted set fee in the case of certain sub-servicing arrangements, and are credited to income when related mortgage payments are received or the sub-servicing fees are earned. Loan origination costs related to residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are recognized as incurred in Financial Services expenses while the associated mortgage origination fees are recognized in Financial Services revenues as earned, generally upon loan closing.

 Title services

Revenues associated with our title operations are recognized within Financial Services revenues as closing services are rendered and title insurance policies are issued, both of which generally occur as each home is closed.


58


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Derivative instruments and hedging activities

We are exposedparty to market risks from commitments to lend, movements in interest rates, and canceled or modified commitments to lend. A commitment to lend at a specific interest rate (an interest rate lock commitment) is a derivative financial instrument (interest rate is locked to the borrower). In order to reduce these risks, we use other derivative financial instruments, principally cash forward placement contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments, to economically hedge the interest rate lock commitment. We enter into these derivative financial instruments based upon our portfolio of interest rate lock commitments and closed loans. We do not use any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

("IRLCs") with customers resulting from our mortgage origination operations. At December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, we had aggregate interest rate lock commitmentsIRLCs of $175.7$273.9 million and $161.6208.2 million, respectively, which were originated at interest rates prevailing at the date of commitment. Since we can terminate a loan commitment if the borrower does not comply with the terms of the contract, and some loan commitments may expire without being drawn upon, these commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate the creditworthiness of these transactions through our normal credit policies.

ForwardWe hedge our exposure to interest rate market risk relating to residential mortgage loans available-for-sale and IRLCs using forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities, which are commitments to either purchase or sell a specified financial instrument at a specified future date for a specified price, that may be settled in cash, by offsetting the position, or through the deliveryand whole loan investor commitments, which are obligations of the financial instrument.an investor to buy loans at a specified price within a specified time period. Forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities are the predominant derivative financial instruments we use to minimize market risk during the period from the time we extend an interest rate lock to a loan applicant until the time the loan is sold to an investor. We also use whole loan investor commitments, which are obligations of the investor to buy loans at a specified price within a specified time period. At December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, we had unexpired forward contracts of $381.5$610.0 million and $428.0$525.0 million,, respectively, and whole loan investor commitments of $31.7$157.6 million and $4.7$77.6 million,, respectively. Changes in the fair value of interest rate lock commitmentsIRLCs and other derivative financial instruments are recognized in Financial Services revenues, and the fair values are reflected in other assets or other liabilities, as applicable.

There are no credit-risk-related contingent features within our derivative agreements, and counterparty risk is considered minimal. Gains and losses on interest rate lock commitmentsIRLCs are substantially offset by corresponding gains or losses on forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities and whole loan investor commitments. We are generally not exposed to variability in cash flows of derivative instruments for more than approximately 7590 days.

The fair values of derivative instruments and their location in the Consolidated Balance Sheets isare summarized below ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Other Assets Other Liabilities Other Assets Other LiabilitiesOther Assets Other Liabilities Other Assets Other Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments$3,628
 $489
 $6,045
 $24
$9,194
 $501
 $5,854
 $280
Forward contracts4,374
 34
 245
 891
8,085
 1,004
 1,178
 840
Whole loan commitments189
 84
 30
 85
1,135
 863
 358
 345
$8,191
 $607
 $6,320
 $1,000
$18,414
 $2,368
 $7,390
 $1,465




59


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


2. Goodwill
Goodwill was recordedNew accounting pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". The standard is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in connection with various acquisitions but was written-offa manner depicting the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. The FASB has also issued a number of updates to this standard. The standard is effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018, and, at that time, we expect to apply the modified retrospective method of adoption. We continue to evaluate the impact that the standard will have on our financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU 2014-15”), which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and provide related disclosures. Adoption of ASU 2014-15 as of December 31, 2011.2016, did not impact our financial statements or disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"), which amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets. ASU 2016-02 is effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. We evaluatedare currently evaluating the recoverabilityimpact that the standard will have on our financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), which includes multiple amendments intended to simplify aspects of share-based payment accounting. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning after January 1, 2017. Amendments to the presentation of employee taxes on the statement of cash flows will be applied retrospectively, and amendments requiring the recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement are to be applied prospectively. Amendments to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, and forfeitures will be applied using a modified retrospective transition method through a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Preliminarily, we expect the cumulative-effect adjustment to increase the January 1, 2017, opening retained earnings and deferred tax assets by $18.6 million from previously unrecognized excess tax benefits (see Note 9). We do not expect the remaining aspects of adopting ASU 2016-09 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" ("ASU 2016-13"), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments from an "incurred loss" approach to a new "expected credit loss" methodology and also requires that credit losses from available-for-sale debt securities be presented as an allowance instead of a write-down. ASU 2016-13 is effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and requires full retrospective application on adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact the standard will have on our financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"), which addresses several specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 is effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and requires full retrospective application on adoption. We do not expect ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment." ("ASU 2017-04"), which removes the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by comparingwhich a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of our reporting units to their fair value. Fair value was determined using discounted cash flows supplemented by market-based assessments of fair value, and impairment was measured as the difference between the resulting implied fair value of goodwill and its recorded carrying value. The determination of fair value was significantly impacted by estimates related to current market valuations, current and future economic conditions in each of our geographical markets, and our strategic plans within each of our markets.
In the third quarter of 2011, we performed an event-driven assessment of the recoverabilityamount of goodwill. This assessment was necessary primarily dueASU 2017-04 is effective for us for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and applied prospectively. We do not expect ASU 2017-04 to sustained declines inhave a material impact on our market capitalization. In performing the goodwill impairment analysis, we used management's estimates of the future cash flows for each reporting unit, which were required to consider the decrease in our market capitalization. The results of this analysis determined that a goodwill impairment charge of $240.5 million in the third quarter of 2011 was required.financial statements.

3.


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


2. Corporate office relocation

OnIn May 31, 2013, we announced our plan to relocate our corporate offices to Atlanta, Georgia, from its currentthe previous location in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, in 2014. The decision to relocate reflects long-term growth trends for both us and the homebuilding industry and is intended to bring our corporate offices closer to our customers and a larger portion of our investment portfolio.Michigan. The relocation of operations will occuroccurred in phases over time but is expected to beand was substantially complete no later than early 2015.in 2016. We expect to incur the following approximate costs in connection with the relocation, the substantial majority of which represent future cash expenditures ($000's omitted):
Employee severance, retention, and relocation costs$21,000
to$26,000
Asset impairments355
to500
Lease termination and other exit costs27,000
to32,000

During 2013, we recorded employee severance, retention, relocation, and related costsexpenses of $15.0$1.0 million, $2.0 million, and $7.6 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. We also recorded lease exit and asset impairments of $0.4impairment expenses totaling $7.3 million,. $2.3 million, and $8.7 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Severance, retention, relocation, and related costsexpenses are recorded within selling, general, and administrative expense, while lease exit and asset impairmentsimpairment expenses are included in other expense, net. We expect the remaining costs to be recognized in 2014 and 2015. We will also incur costs at the new location related to the recruitment and onboarding of new employees and certain redundant operating costs. The amount of such costs is not expected to be material.



60


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


4.3. Inventory and land held for sale

Major components of inventory at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 were ($000’s omitted):
2013 20122016 2015
Homes under construction$1,042,147
 $1,116,184
$1,921,259
 $1,408,260
Land under development2,189,387
 2,435,378
4,072,109
 3,259,066
Raw land747,027
 662,484
777,287
 782,732
$3,978,561
 $4,214,046
$6,770,655
 $5,450,058

We capitalize interest cost into inventory during the active development and construction of our communities. Each layer of capitalized interest is amortized over a period that approximates the average life of communities under development. Interest expense is recorded based on the timing of home closings. In all periods presented, we capitalized all Homebuilding interest costs into inventory because the level of our active inventory exceeded our debt levels.

Information Activity related to interest capitalized into inventory is as follows ($000’s omitted):
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Interest in inventory, beginning of period$331,880
 $355,068
 $323,379
$149,498
 $167,638
 $230,922
Interest capitalized154,107
 201,103
 221,071
160,506
 120,001
 131,444
Interest expensed (a)(255,065) (224,291) (189,382)(123,907) (138,141) (194,728)
Interest in inventory, end of period$230,922
 $331,880
 $355,068
$186,097
 $149,498
 $167,638
Interest incurred (b)
$154,819
 $201,103
 $221,071

(a)
Interest expensed to Home sale cost of revenues for 2013, 2012, and 2011 included $2.9 million, $6.5 million, and $5.4 million, respectively, of capitalized interest write-offs related to land-related charges.
(b)Homebuilding interest incurred includes interest on senior debt and certain other financing arrangements.

Land-related charges

We recorded the following land-related charges during the three years ended December 31, 2013:($000's omitted):

2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Land impairments$2,944
 $13,437
 $15,940
$1,074
 $7,347
 $3,911
Net realizable value adjustments ("NRV") - land held for sale3,606
 1,480
 9,844
1,105
 (901) 1,158
Write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs3,122
 2,278
 10,002
Write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs17,157
 5,021
 6,099
Total land-related charges$9,672
 $17,195
 $35,786
$19,336
 $11,467
 $11,168

Land impairmentsheld for sale

We record land impairment valuation adjustments to our communities within Homebuilding homeLand held for sale cost of revenues. Our evaluations for impairments are based on our best estimates of the future cash flows for our communities. However, if conditions in our local markets worsen in the future or if our strategy related to certain communities changes, we may be required to evaluate our assets for further impairments or write-downs.at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2016 2015
Land held for sale, gross$38,157
 $86,913
Net realizable value reserves(6,429) (5,421)
Land held for sale, net$31,728
 $81,492


61


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Net realizable value adjustments – land held for sale

We record net realizable value adjustments to land held for sale within Homebuilding land sale cost of revenues. During 2013, the decrease in the gross land held for sale and net realizable value reserve balances resulted primarily from the sale of land parcels, certain of which were previously impaired. Land held for sale at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2013 2012
Land held for sale, gross$70,003
 $135,201
Net realizable value reserves(8,268) (44,097)
Land held for sale, net$61,735
 $91,104

Write-off of deposits and pre-acquisition costs

We write off deposits and pre-acquisition costs when it becomes probable that we will not go forward with the land option agreement or recover the capitalized costs. We record write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs within other expense, net.

5.4. Segment information

Our Homebuilding operations are engaged in the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes within the U.S. and the construction of housing on such land. Home sale revenues for detached and attached homes were $6.5 billion and $996.4 million in 2016, $4.55.0 billion and $939.0841.5 million in 20132015, and $3.64.8 billion and $925.4885.8 million in 2012, and $3.1 billion and $841.3 million in 20112014, respectively. For reporting purposes, our Homebuilding operations are aggregated into six reportable segments:
Northeast: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Virginia
Southeast: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Florida: Florida
Midwest:Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio
Texas: Texas
North:Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Northern California, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
Southwest:West: Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Southern CaliforniaWashington

We also have a reportable segment for our Financial Services operations, which consist principally of mortgage banking and title operations. The Financial Services segment operates generally in the same markets as the Homebuilding segments.

Evaluation of segment performance is generally based on income before income taxes. Each reportable segment generally follows the same accounting policies described in Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements..
 

62


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Operating Data by Segment ($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Data by Segment ($000’s omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Revenues:          
Northeast$819,709
 $755,148
 $717,839
$696,463
 $682,112
 $710,859
Southeast(a)842,921
 691,113
 675,904
1,491,270
 1,058,089
 949,635
Florida802,665
 628,997
 571,102
1,284,753
 1,019,733
 917,956
Midwest1,234,650
 1,020,691
 872,241
Texas835,473
 682,929
 631,419
1,034,673
 845,772
 859,165
North1,232,814
 1,022,633
 740,372
Southwest1,005,062
 878,290
 696,960
West1,745,541
 1,214,814
 1,386,869
5,538,644
 4,659,110
 4,033,596
7,487,350
 5,841,211
 5,696,725
Financial Services140,951
 160,888
 103,094
181,126
 140,753
 125,638
Consolidated revenues$5,679,595
 $4,819,998
 $4,136,690
$7,668,476
 $5,981,964
 $5,822,363
          
Income (loss) before income taxes:     
Income before income taxes:     
Northeast(b)$110,246
 $73,345
 $29,320
$81,991
 $82,616
 $103,865
Southeast(a)121,055
 64,678
 45,060
145,011
 172,330
 156,513
Florida139,673
 73,472
 44,946
205,049
 196,525
 190,441
Midwest120,159
 91,745
 78,863
Texas111,431
 60,979
 33,329
152,355
 121,329
 133,005
North164,348
 84,597
 (12,376)
Southwest179,163
 79,887
 36,647
West225,771
 169,394
 254,724
Other homebuilding (a)(c)
(346,803) (278,967) (452,756)(69,570) (76,622) (282,234)
479,113
 157,991
 (275,830)860,766
 757,317
 635,177
Financial Services48,709
 25,563
 (34,470)
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes$527,822
 $183,554
 $(310,300)
Financial Services (d)
73,084
 58,706
 54,581
Consolidated income before income taxes$933,850
 $816,023
 $689,758

(a)
Southeast includes the acquisition in January 2016 of substantially all of the assets of Wieland (see Note 1).
(b)
Northeast includes a charge of $15.0 million in 2016 related to the settlement of a disputed land transaction and a charge of $20.0 million in 2015 resulting from the Applecross matter (see Note 12).
(c)
Other homebuilding includes the amortization of intangible assets, goodwill impairment, amortization of capitalized interest, and other costsitems not allocated to the operating segments. Other homebuilding also included the following:segments, in addition to: losses on debt retirements of $26.9 million, $32.1$0.7 million and $5.6 million, for 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively; costs of $15.4$8.6 million in 20132016 and 2014, respectively (see Note 6); adjustments to insurance reserves relating to a reversal of $55.2 million in 2016, reversals totaling $62.2 million in 2015, and a charge of $69.3 million in 2014 (see Note 12); and costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters;headquarters totaling $8.3 million, $4.4 million, and charges of $41.2$16.3 million in 2013 resulting from a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community.2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively (see Note 2).
(d)
Financial Services included reductions in loan origination liabilities totaling $11.8 million and $18.6 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively (see Note 12).


 
















63


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)



Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Land-related charges*:          
Northeast$557
 $1,794
 $4,958
$2,079
 $3,301
 $2,824
Southeast998
 1,363
 2,429
3,089
 3,022
 1,826
Florida1,076
 214
 3,999
715
 4,555
 487
Midwest3,383
 2,319
 2,347
Texas191
 556
 828
515
 295
 321
North3,434
 4,546
 14,867
Southwest472
 2,254
 3,263
West8,960
 (2,615) 1,696
Other homebuilding2,944
 6,468
 5,442
595
 590
 1,667
$9,672
 $17,195
 $35,786
$19,336
 $11,467
 $11,168

*
Land-related charges include land impairments, net realizable value adjustments for land held for sale, and write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs for land option contracts we elected not to pursue. Other homebuilding consists primarily of write-offs of capitalized interest related to such land-related charges. See Note 41 for additional discussion of these charges.
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Depreciation and amortization:          
Northeast$1,987
 $1,790
 $1,820
$2,133
 $1,682
 $1,852
Southeast1,647
 1,028
 1,414
5,350
 3,492
 2,666
Florida1,334
 1,640
 2,045
4,955
 3,536
 2,150
Midwest5,099
 5,019
 3,153
Texas1,784
 1,619
 2,002
3,673
 2,928
 1,698
North2,265
 1,709
 1,614
Southwest2,969
 3,143
 3,076
West6,739
 5,995
 5,263
Other homebuilding (a)
16,248
 16,168
 17,329
22,467
 20,254
 19,548
28,234
 27,097
 29,300
50,416
 42,906
 36,330
Financial Services3,353
 2,930
 2,798
3,591
 3,316
 3,534
$31,587
 $30,027
 $32,098
$54,007
 $46,222
 $39,864
(a)Other homebuilding includes amortization of intangible assetsassets.
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
Operating Data by Segment ($000's omitted)
Years Ended December 31,
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities:          
Northeast$(58) $(4) $15
$2
 $2
 $(4,733)
Southeast
 
 

 
 
Florida(4) 
 
(10) 2
 (7)
Midwest78
 (337) (481)
Texas
 
 

 
 
North(608) (1,497) (121)
Southwest(678) (1,137) (2,561)
West(6,759) (5,107) (2,422)
Other homebuilding355
 (1,235) (527)(1,117) (1,915) (583)
(993) (3,873) (3,194)(7,806) (7,355) (8,226)
Financial Services(137) (186) (102)(531) 
 (182)
$(1,130) $(4,059) $(3,296)$(8,337) $(7,355) $(8,408)



64


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Operating Data by SegmentOperating Data by Segment
($000's omitted)($000's omitted)
December 31, 2013December 31, 2016
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$212,611
 $325,241
 $106,681
 $644,533
 $731,259
$175,253
 $375,899
 $135,447
 $686,599
 $798,369
Southeast139,484
 274,981
 146,617
 561,082
 599,271
Southeast (a)
354,047
 650,805
 148,793
 1,153,645
 1,243,188
Florida140,366
 295,631
 104,766
 540,763
 618,449
309,525
 683,376
 183,168
 1,176,069
 1,330,847
Midwest256,649
 474,287
 50,302
 781,238
 851,457
Texas130,398
 223,979
 57,480
 411,857
 466,198
219,606
 413,312
 74,750
 707,668
 793,917
North227,537
 350,239
 78,945
 656,721
 716,239
Southwest159,350
 512,164
 201,659
 873,173
 940,462
Other homebuilding (a)
32,401
 207,152
 50,879
 290,432
 4,334,591
West580,082
 1,226,190
 159,387
 1,965,659
 2,200,058
Other homebuilding (b)
26,097
 248,240
 25,440
 299,777
 2,351,082
1,042,147
 2,189,387
 747,027
 3,978,561
 8,406,469
1,921,259
 4,072,109
 777,287
 6,770,655
 9,568,918
Financial Services
 
 
 
 327,674

 
 
 
 609,282
$1,042,147
 $2,189,387
 $747,027
 $3,978,561
 $8,734,143
$1,921,259
 $4,072,109
 $777,287
 $6,770,655
 $10,178,200
                  
December 31, 2012December 31, 2015
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$198,549
 $445,436
 $109,136
 $753,121
 $866,024
$163,173
 $292,631
 $121,522
 $577,326
 $688,610
Southeast147,227
 286,210
 120,193
 553,630
 590,650
196,456
 367,577
 139,246
 703,279
 765,933
Florida130,276
 310,625
 100,633
 541,534
 620,220
227,910
 574,092
 97,185
 899,187
 1,013,543
Midwest197,738
 414,386
 68,918
 681,042
 734,834
Texas145,594
 256,704
 54,556
 456,854
 523,843
191,424
 317,702
 107,737
 616,863
 691,342
North219,172
 369,144
 46,414
 634,730
 680,447
Southwest226,204
 496,488
 167,295
 889,987
 963,540
Other homebuilding (a)
49,162
 270,771
 64,257
 384,190
 2,140,739
West413,208
 1,094,112
 222,920
 1,730,240
 1,924,958
Other homebuilding (b)
18,351
 198,566
 25,204
 242,121
 2,861,197
1,116,184
 2,435,378
 662,484
 4,214,046
 6,385,463
1,408,260
 3,259,066
 782,732
 5,450,058
 8,680,417
Financial Services
 
 
 
 348,946

 
 
 
 508,989
$1,116,184
 $2,435,378
 $662,484
 $4,214,046
 $6,734,409
$1,408,260
 $3,259,066
 $782,732
 $5,450,058
 $9,189,406
                  
December 31, 2011December 31, 2014
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Homes Under
Construction
 Land Under
Development
 Raw Land Total
Inventory
 Total
Assets
Northeast$237,722
 $457,010
 $119,549
 $814,281
 $957,844
$184,974
 $266,229
 $106,077
 $557,280
 $659,224
Southeast166,302
 315,208
 123,209
 604,719
 626,506
147,506
 304,762
 117,981
 570,249
 605,067
Florida137,900
 321,841
 110,040
 569,781
 637,418
150,743
 350,016
 112,225
 612,984
 717,531
Midwest176,966
 326,549
 70,266
 573,781
 624,815
Texas136,325
 294,814
 77,125
 508,264
 568,974
134,873
 250,102
 91,765
 476,740
 528,392
North268,011
 360,202
 91,260
 719,473
 803,174
Southwest216,067
 577,656
 216,554
 1,010,277
 1,099,058
Other homebuilding (a)
48,390
 283,770
 77,513
 409,673
 1,904,847
West270,060
 850,629
 230,199
 1,350,888
 1,485,685
Other homebuilding (b)
19,015
 196,762
 34,401
 250,178
 3,518,508
1,210,717
 2,610,501
 815,250
 4,636,468
 6,597,821
1,084,137
 2,545,049
 762,914
 4,392,100
 8,139,222
Financial Services
 
 
 
 287,799

 
 
 
 420,965
$1,210,717
 $2,610,501
 $815,250
 $4,636,468
 $6,885,620
$1,084,137
 $2,545,049
 $762,914
 $4,392,100
 $8,560,187
 
(a)
Southeast includes the acquisition in January 2016 of substantially all of the assets of Wieland (see Note 1).
(b)Other homebuilding primarily includes cash and equivalents, capitalized interest, intangibles, deferred tax assets, and other corporate items that are not allocated to the operating segments.


65


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


6.5. Investments in unconsolidated entities

We participate in a number of joint ventures with independent third parties. Many of theseThese joint ventures generally purchase, develop, and/orand sell land, and homes.including selling land to us for use in our homebuilding operations. A summary of our joint ventures is presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,
2013 20122016 2015
Investments in joint ventures with debt non-recourse to PulteGroup$26,532
 $11,155
$33,436
 $23,236
Investments in other active joint ventures18,791
 34,474
18,011
 18,031
Total investments in unconsolidated entities$45,323
 $45,629
$51,447
 $41,267
      
Total joint venture debt$12,408
 $6,915
$4,605
 $16,369
      
PulteGroup proportionate share of joint venture debt:      
Joint venture debt with limited recourse guaranties$750
 $769
$
 $226
Joint venture debt non-recourse to PulteGroup3,654
 826
1,349
 6,744
PulteGroup's total proportionate share of joint venture debt$4,404
 $1,595
$1,349
 $6,970

In 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014, we recognized (income) expenseincome from unconsolidated joint ventures of $(1.1)$8.3 million,, $(4.1) $7.4 million,, and $(3.3)$8.4 million,, respectively. During 2013, 2012, and 2011, we respectively (of which $0.2 million related to Financial Services in 2014). We made capital contributions of $1.7$14.5 million, $16.5 million, and $4.6 million, respectively, during the year, and received distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures of $10.9 million, $6.0 million, and $13.1 million, in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. No significant capital contributions occurred during 2015, and earnings distributions of $3.1 million, $10.5 million, and $11.6 million, respectively.2014.

The timing of cash obligations under theflows related to a joint venture and any related financing agreements varies by agreement. If additional capital contributions are required and approved by the joint venture, we would need to contribute our pro rata portion of those capital needs in order to not dilute our ownership in the joint ventures. While future capital contributions may be required, we believe the total amount of such contributions will be limited. Our maximum financial loss exposure related to joint ventures is unlikely to exceed the combined investment and limited recourse guaranty totals.


66


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


7.
6. Debt

Our senior notes are summarized as follows ($000’s omitted):
 December 31,
 2013 2012
5.25% unsecured senior notes due January 2014 (a)
$
 $187,970
5.70% unsecured senior notes due May 2014 (a)

 208,274
5.20% unsecured senior notes due February 2015 (a)
95,633
 95,615
5.25% unsecured senior notes due June 2015 (a)
233,085
 264,058
6.50% unsecured senior notes due May 2016 (a)
459,581
 457,154
7.625% unsecured senior notes due October 2017 (b)
122,663
 149,481
7.875% unsecured senior notes due June 2032 (a)
299,196
 299,152
6.375% unsecured senior notes due May 2033 (a)
398,567
 398,492
6.00% unsecured senior notes due February 2035 (a)
299,443
 299,417
7.375% unsecured senior notes due June 2046 (a)
150,000
 150,000
Total senior notes – carrying value (c)
$2,058,168
 $2,509,613
Estimated fair value$2,070,744
 $2,663,451
 December 31,
 2016 2015
6.500% unsecured senior notes due May 2016 (a)
$
 $465,245
7.625% unsecured senior notes due October 2017 (b)
123,000
 123,000
4.250% unsecured senior notes due March 2021 (a)
700,000
 
5.500% unsecured senior notes due March 2026 (a)
700,000
 
5.000% unsecured senior notes due January 2027 (a)
600,000
 
7.875% unsecured senior notes due June 2032 (a)
300,000
 300,000
6.375% unsecured senior notes due May 2033 (a)
400,000
 400,000
6.000% unsecured senior notes due February 2035 (a)
300,000
 300,000
Net premiums, discounts, and issuance costs (c)
(12,984) (12,163)
Total senior notes$3,110,016
 $1,576,082
Estimated fair value$3,112,297
 $1,643,651

(a)Redeemable prior to maturity; guaranteed on a senior basis by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries.
(b)Not redeemable prior to maturity; guaranteed on a senior basis by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries.
(c)
The recorded carrying value of senior notes reflects the impact of variouspremiums, discounts, and premiumsissuance costs that are amortized to interest cost over the respective terms of the senior notes. As discussed in Note 1, we adopted ASU 2015-03 in January 2016. We applied the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements to conform to the 2016 presentation. As a result, $10.3 million of debt issuance costs at December 31, 2015, were reclassified from other assets to a reduction in senior notes.

Refer to Note 14 for supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company.

The indentures governing the senior notes impose certain restrictions on the incurrence of additional debt along with other limitations. At December 31, 20132016, we were in compliance with all of the covenants and requirements under the senior notes.

Total Our senior note principal maturities of $2.1 billion during the five years after 2013 and thereafter are as follows:2014 - $0.0 million; 2015 - $333.6 million; 2016 - $465.2 million; 2017 - $123.0 million; 2018 through 2020 - $0.0 million; 2021 - $700.0 million; and thereafter - $1.22.3 billion. Refer to Note 13 for supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company.

DebtIn February 2016, we issued $1.0 billion of senior unsecured notes, consisting of $300.0 million of 4.25% senior notes due March 1, 2021, and $700.0 million of 5.50% senior notes due March 1, 2026. The net proceeds from this senior notes issuance were used to fund the retirement of $465.2 million of our senior notes that matured in May 2016, with the remaining net proceeds used for general corporate purposes. In July 2016, we issued an additional $1.0 billion of senior unsecured notes, consisting of an additional $400.0 million of the 4.25% senior notes due March 1, 2021, and $600.0 million of 5.00% senior notes due January 15, 2027. The net proceeds from the July senior notes issuance were used for general corporate purposes and to pay down approximately $500.0 million of outstanding debt, including the remainder of the previously existing term loan facility, which resulted in a write-off of $0.7 million of remaining debt issuance costs. The senior notes issued in 2016 are unsecured obligations, and rank equally in right of payment with the existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of the Company and each of the guarantors, respectively. The notes are redeemable at our option at any time up to the date of maturity.

DuringWe retired outstanding debt totaling $965.2 million, $238.0 million, and $245.7 million during 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Certain debt retirements occurred prior to the last three years, we significantly reduced our outstanding senior notes through a variety of transactions, including scheduled maturities, open market repurchases, early redemptions as provided within indenture agreements,stated maturity dates and tender offers. As a result of these transactions, we reduced our outstanding senior notes by $461.4 million, $592.4 million, and $323.9 million during 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and recordedresulted in losses totaling $26.9$0.7 million, $32.1 and $8.6 million, in 2016 and $5.6 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011,2014, respectively. Losses on thesedebt repurchase transactions include the write-off of unamortized discounts, premiums, and transaction fees related to the repurchased debt and are reflected in other expense, (income), net.



67


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


 LetterRevolving credit facility

In June 2016, we entered into an amended and restated senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) that provided for an increase in our maximum borrowings from $500.0 million to $750.0 million and extended the maturity date from July 2017 to June 2019. The Revolving Credit Facility contains an uncommitted accordion feature that could increase the size of the Revolving Credit Facility to $1.25 billion, subject to certain conditions and availability of additional bank commitments. The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for the issuance of letters of credit facilitiesthat reduce the available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility with a sublimit of $375.0 million at December 31, 2016. The interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility may be based on either the LIBOR or Base Rate plus an applicable margin, as defined therein. We had no borrowings outstanding and $219.1 million and $191.3 million of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum Tangible Net Worth, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, and a maximum Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio (as each term is defined in the Revolving Credit Facility). As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants. Outstanding balances under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our available and unused borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit, amounted to $530.9 million and $308.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Limited recourse notes payable

WeCertain of our local homebuilding operations maintain separate cash-collateralized letter of credit agreementslimited recourse collateralized notes payable with a number of financial institutions. Letters of credit totaling $58.7third parties that totaled $19.3 million and $54.5$35.3 million were outstanding under these agreements at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, respectively. UnderThese notes have maturities ranging up to four years, are collateralized by the applicable land positions to which they relate, have no recourse to any other assets, and are classified within accrued and other liabilities. The stated interest rates on these agreements, we are requirednotes range up to maintain deposits with the respective financial institutions in amounts approximating the letters of credit outstanding. Such deposits are included in restricted cash.5.00%.

We also maintain an unsecured letter of credit facility with a bank that expires in September 2014. This facility permits the issuance of up to $150.0 million of letters of credit for general corporate purposes in support of any wholly-owned subsidiary. Letters of credit totaling $124.4 million and $124.6 million were outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Financial Services

Pulte Mortgage provides mortgage financing for the majority of our home closings utilizing its own funds and funds made available pursuant to credit agreements with third party lenders or through intercompany borrowings. Pulte Mortgage uses these resources to finance its lending activities until the mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market, which generally occurs within 30 days.

Pulte Mortgage maintains a master repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”) with third party lenders that expires in September 2014. Effective January 2014,lenders. In August 2016, Pulte Mortgage voluntarily reduced the borrowing capacity underamended the Repurchase Agreement from $150.0 millionto $99.8 million subjectextend the effective date to certain sublimits. We reducedAugust 2017, and adjusted the maximum aggregate commitment amount according to seasonal borrowing capacity needs. In December 2016, Pulte Mortgage again amended its Repurchase Agreement to increase the maximum aggregate commitment amount to cover seasonal borrowing capacity needs. The maximum aggregate commitment was $360.0 million during the seasonally high borrowing period from December 27, 2016 through January 12, 2017. At all other times, the maximum aggregate commitment ranges from $175.0 million to $200.0 million. The purpose of the changes in ordercapacity during the term of the agreement is to lower associated fees during seasonally lowlower volume periods when the additional capacity is unnecessary.of mortgage origination activity. Borrowings under the Repurchase Agreement are secured by residential mortgage loans available-for-sale. The Repurchase Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Pulte Mortgage, including quantitative thresholds related to net worth, net income, and liquidity. At December 31, 2013, Pulte Mortgage had $105.7$331.6 million and $267.9 million outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement at December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively, and was in compliance with all of its covenants and requirements. During 2011 and portionsrequirements as of 2012, Pulte Mortgage funded its operations using internal Company resources after allowing its previous third party credit arrangements to expire.such dates.

The following is aggregate borrowing information for our mortgage operations as of each year-end ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,  
2013 2012 20112016 2015
Available credit lines$150,000
 $150,000
 $2,500
$360,000
 $310,000
Unused credit lines$44,336
 $11,205
 $2,500
$28,379
 $42,123
Weighted-average interest rate2.90% 3.00% 4.50%2.89% 2.65%

8.

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


7. Shareholders’ equity

We reinstated ourOur declared quarterly cash dividenddividends totaled $122.2 million, $117.9 million, and $86.4 million in July 2013. During 2013, we declared three cash dividends of $0.05 per common share each.

In July 2013, we increased our common2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Under the share repurchase authorization to $352.3 millionprogram authorized by our Board of common shares. In 2013,Directors, we repurchased 7.230.9 million, 21.2 million, and 12.9 million shares under the repurchase authorizationin 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, for a total of $118.1600.0 million. There were no repurchases under these programs during 2012 or 2011., $433.7 million, and $245.8 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. At December 31, 2013,2016, we had remaining authorization to purchase $234.3 millionrepurchase $1.0 billion of common shares.

Under our stock-based compensation plans, we accept shares as payment under certain conditions related to stock option exercises and vesting of restricted stock,shares and share units, generally related to the payment of minimum tax obligations. During 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014, employees surrendered shares valued at $9.6$3.2 million, $1.0$9.0 million,, and $2.8$7.2 million, respectively, under these plans. Such share transactions are excluded from the above noted share repurchase authorization.


68


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


9.8. Stock compensation plans

We maintain a stock award plan for both employees and for non-employee directors. The plan provides for the grant of a variety of equity awards, including options (generally non-qualified options), restricted stock,shares, performance shares, and restricted stockshare units ("RSUs") to key employees (as determined by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors) for periods not exceeding to exceed ten years. Non-employee directors are entitled to an annual distribution of stock options, common shares, or RSUs. All options granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and are exercisable for ten years from the grant date. Options granted to employees generally vest incrementally over four years and are generally exercisable for ten years from the vest date. Restricted shares and RSUs generally cliff vest after three years. Restricted stock generally cliff vests after three years.share holders have voting rights during the vesting period and both restricted share and RSU holders receive cash dividends during the vesting period. Performance shares vest upon attainment of the stated performance targets and minimum service requirements and are converted into shares of common stockshares upon distribution. RSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of common stockshares and are converted into shares of common stockshares upon distribution. As of December 31, 2013,2016, there were 22.026.0 million shares that remained available for grant under the plan.

Non-employee directors are entitled to an annual distribution of stock options, common stock, or restricted stock units. All options and RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and are exercisable on the grant date for ten years.

Our stock compensation expense for the three years ended December 31, 20132016, is presented below ($000's omitted):
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Stock options$1,056
 $2,617
 $5,228
$
 $37
 $121
Restricted stock (including RSUs and performance shares)13,418
 10,077
 11,231
Restricted shares (including RSUs and performance shares)18,626
 16,852
 13,690
Long-term incentive plans16,006
 10,203
 511
3,602
 7,863
 15,481
$30,480
 $22,897
 $16,970
$22,228
 $24,752
 $29,292

Stock options

A summary of stock option activity for the three years ended December 31, 20132016, is presented below (000’s omitted, except per share data):
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year17,148
 $22
 21,641
 $21
 24,004
 $21
6,040
 $19
 9,370
 $23
 12,887
 $23
Granted
 
 
 
 441
 8

 
 
 
 
 
Exercised(1,432) 14
 (2,877) 11
 
 
(498) 12
 (904) 12
 (1,422) 11
Forfeited(2,829) 25
 (1,616) 27
 (2,804) 15
(1,919) 34
 (2,426) 37
 (2,095) 29
Outstanding, end of year12,887
 $23
 17,148
 $22
 21,641
 $21
3,623
 $12
 6,040
 $19
 9,370
 $23
Options exercisable at year end12,402
 $23
 15,719
 $23
 18,845
 $23
3,623
 $12
 6,040
 $19
 9,265
 $23
Weighted-average per share fair value of
options granted during the year
$
   $
   $4.46
  $
   $
   $
  


69


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average remaining contractual lives of stockour options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013:2016: 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 
Number
Outstanding
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(in years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 
Number
Exercisable
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average Per
Share
Exercise Price
$0.01 to $11.001,665
 4.8 $10
 1,444
 $10
$11.01 to $18.004,659
 5.5 12
 4,395
 12
$18.01 to $25.00480
 1.2 23
 480
 23
$25.01 to $35.003,894
 2.0 31
 3,893
 31
$35.01 to $60.002,189
 1.8 41
 2,190
 41
 12,887
 3.6 $23
 12,402
 $23
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 
Number
Outstanding
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contract Life
(in years)
 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Exercise Price
 
Number
Exercisable
(000's omitted)
 
Weighted-
Average Per
Share
Exercise Price
$0.01 to $10.00320
 3.8 $8
 320
 $8
$10.01 to $20.003,205
 2.5 12
 3,205
 12
$20.01 to $30.0082
 0.4 27
 82
 27
$30.01 to $40.0016
 0.1 35
 16
 35
 3,623
 2.6 $12
 3,623
 $12

We did not issue any stock options during 20132016, 2015, or 2012. The fair value of each option grant issued in 2011 was estimated on the date of grant using primarily the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
Weighted-Average Assumptions
Year Ended December 31,
 2013 2012 2011
Expected life of options in yearsN/A N/A 6.2
Expected stock price volatilityN/A N/A 58%
Expected dividend yieldN/A N/A 0.0%
Risk-free interest rateN/A N/A 2.7%

We estimate the expected life of stock options using employees’ historical exercise behavior and the contractual terms of the instruments. Volatility2014. As a result, there is estimated using historical volatility with consideration for implied volatility.

Totalno unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards not yet recognized was $0.2 millionat December 31, 2013. These costs will be expensed over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately one year. The stock option participant agreements provide continued vesting for certain eligible employees who have achieved a predetermined level of service based on their combined age and years of service. We record the related compensation cost for these awards over the period through the date the employee first achieves the minimum level of service that would no longer require them to provide services to earn the award, which is reflected in the weighted-average vesting period.

2016. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options that were exercised during 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014 was $10.8$4.5 million,, $8.6 $9.4 million,, and $0.0$14.1 million,, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2016, options outstanding, all of which were exercisable, had an intrinsic value of $56.7 million, of which $51.6 million related to options exercisable.$24.3 million.


70


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Restricted stockshares (including RSUs and performance shares)

A summary of restricted stockshare activity, including RSUs and performance shares, for the three years ended December 31, 20132016, is presented below (000’s omitted, except per share data):
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares 
Weighted-
Average
Per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
Unvested at beginning of
year
3,822
 $9
 3,042
 $9
 2,915
 $12
Outstanding, beginning of
year
2,576
 $18
 2,890
 $15
 3,211
 $11
Granted806
 $21
 1,461
 $10
 1,804
 $7
1,853
 17
 932
 22
 974
 19
Vested(1,391) $11
 (544) $11
 (1,434) $12
Distributed(546) 20
 (1,090) 10
 (1,019) 10
Forfeited(26) $15
 (137) $10
 (243) $11
(909) 12
 (156) 19
 (276) 15
Unvested at end of year3,211
 $11
 3,822
 $9
 3,042
 $9
Outstanding, end of year2,974
 $19
 2,576
 $18
 2,890
 $15
Vested, end of year60
 $12
 51
 $10
 120
 $11
123
 $15
 89
 $14
 75
 $13

During 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, the total fair value of shares vested during the year was $12.7$11.0 million,, $3.7 $10.2 million,, and $15.9$8.1 million,, respectively. Unamortized compensation cost related to restricted stockshare awards was $12.1$18.4 million at December 31, 2013.2016. These costs will be expensed over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years.

During 2013, 2012, and 2011, we granted performance shares to certain individuals. The fair value of each performance share was calculated using the stock price on the grant date. We recognize expense when it becomes probable that the stated performance targets will be achieved. Unamortized compensation cost related to performance shares considered probable was $1.3 million at December 31, 2013 and will be expensed over a weighted-average period of approximately one year. Additionally, there were 59,708122,611 RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2016, that had vested but had not yet been paid out because the payout date had been deferred by the holder.

Long-term incentive plans

We maintain a long-term incentive planplans for certain of our fieldsenior management and other employees that providesprovide awards based on the achievement of stated performance targets over a three-year period.three-year periods. Awards are earned each year in the form of share units that are paid out in cash at the end of the performance period based upon the number of share units earned times the stock price at the end of the performance period.  Accordingly, the liability associated with the awards is adjusted each reporting period based on movements in the stock price and totaled $12.6 million and $5.9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

During 2012, we implemented a long-term performance award plan for senior management that provides awards based on the achievement of stated performance targets over a three-year period.  Awards are earned based on our cumulative performance over the performance period and are stated in dollars but are settled in common shares based on the stock price at the end of the performance period. If the stockshare price falls below a floor of $5.00$5.00 per share at the end of the performance period or we do not have a sufficient number of shares available under our stock incentive plans at the time of settlement, then a portion of each award will be paid in cash. We adjust the liabilities and recognize the expense for theseassociated with the awards based on the probability of achievement ofachieving the stated performance targets. The liabilitytargets at each reporting period. Liabilities for these awards totaled $14.3$11.2 million and $23.2 million at December 31, 2013.

2016 and 2015, respectively.

71


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


10.
9. Income taxes

Components of current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) are as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Current provision (benefit)     
Current expense (benefit)     
Federal$5,725
 $(8,523) $(71,796)$9,464
 $8,760
 $5,619
State and other(1,596) (14,068) (28,116)(13,104) 1,474
 (13,968)
$4,129
 $(22,591) $(99,912)$(3,640) $10,234
 $(8,349)
Deferred provision (benefit)     
Deferred expense (benefit)     
Federal$(1,833,580) $
 $
$312,288
 $277,895
 $232,969
State and other(262,843) 
 
22,499
 33,804
 (9,200)
$(2,096,423) $
 $
$334,787
 $311,699
 $223,769
Income tax expense (benefit)$(2,092,294) $(22,591) $(99,912)$331,147
 $321,933
 $215,420

The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate:
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Income taxes at federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %35.0 % 35.0% 35.0 %
Effect of state and local income taxes, net of federal tax4.0
 3.0
 3.0
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax3.3
 2.8
 3.0
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(438.0) (37.7) (7.0)(2.2) 0.4
 (6.6)
Tax contingencies0.3
 (10.6) 28.4
(1.3) 0.1
 (1.4)
Goodwill impairment
 
 (28.7)
Other2.3
 (2.0) 1.5
0.7
 1.2
 1.2
Effective rate(396.4)% (12.3)% 32.2 %35.5 % 39.5% 31.2 %

Our effective tax rate was 35.5%, 39.5% and 31.2% for 2016, 2015, and 2014 respectively. The 2016 effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, the reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance related to a legal entity restructuring, the favorable resolution of certain state income tax matters, the impact on our net deferred tax assets due to changes in business operations and state tax laws, and recognition of energy efficient home credits. The 2015 effective tax rate exceeds the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes and the impact of changes in business operations and state tax laws to our net deferred tax assets. The 2014 effective tax rate is less than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the reversal of a portion of our valuation allowance related to certain state deferred tax assets, along with the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters.


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences arising from the different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. Components of our net deferred tax asset are as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
At December 31,At December 31,
2013 20122016 2015
Deferred tax assets:      
Accrued insurance$220,823
 $237,836
Non-deductible reserves and other$475,730
 $486,990
140,987
 155,488
Inventory valuation reserves770,566
 953,266
359,964
 476,673
Net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards:      
Federal726,398
 785,302
187,817
 367,302
State292,195
 320,831
224,316
 274,686
Alternative minimum tax credits28,683
 25,338
Energy credit and charitable contribution carryforward39,978
 38,895
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards53,917
 44,161
Energy and other credit carryforwards45,673
 28,669
2,333,550
 2,610,622
1,233,497
 1,584,815
Deferred tax liabilities:      
Capitalized items, including real estate basis differences,
deducted for tax, net
(39,449) (84,637)(82,445) (39,220)
Trademarks and tradenames(50,047) (56,714)(36,781) (41,664)
(89,496) (141,351)(119,226) (80,884)
Valuation allowance(157,300) (2,469,271)(64,863) (109,052)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)$2,086,754
 $
Net deferred tax asset$1,049,408
 $1,394,879
 

72


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Our effective tax rategross federal NOL carryforward is affected by a number of factors,approximately $536.6 million and expires between 2030 and 2032. We also have state NOLs in various jurisdictions which may generally be carried forward from 5 to 20 years, depending on the most significant of which arejurisdiction. The $44.2 million reduction in the valuation allowance relatedincludes a reduction of $23.6 million for NOL carryforwards expiring in 2016. There was no income statement or tax rate impact from the NOL carryforward expirations because there was a corresponding reduction to ourthe state NOL deferred tax asset. The remaining state NOL carryforwards expire if unused at various dates as follows: of the total state deferred tax assets, $13.4 million from 2017 to 2021 and changes in our unrecognized$210.9 million from 2022 and thereafter. In addition, we have federal energy credit carryforwards that expire, if unused, between 2026 and 2036 and alternative minimum tax benefits. Due to the effects of these factors, our effective tax rates in 2013, 2012, and 2011 are not correlated to the amount of our income or loss before income taxes. The income tax benefit for 2013 resulted from the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets while the income tax benefits for 2012 and 2011 resulted primarily from the favorable resolution of certain federal and state income tax matters.credits that can be carried forward indefinitely.

From 2007 to 2011, we generated significant deferred tax assets primarily from asset impairments combined with reduced operational profitability. We evaluate our deferred tax assets each period to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on whether it is "more likely than not" that some portion of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. The ultimate realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient taxable income during future periods.  We conduct our evaluation by considering all available positive and negative evidence. This evaluation considers, among other factors, historical operating results, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, and the outlooks for the U.S. housing industry and broader economy. Based on our evaluation through June 30, 2013, we fully reserved our net deferred tax assets
Our ability to use certain of Centex’s federal losses and credits is limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. We do not believe that this limitation will prevent the Company from utilizing these Centex losses and credits. We do believe that full utilization of certain state NOL carryforwards will be limited due to the uncertainty of their realization. One of the primary pieces of negative evidence we considered was the significant losses we incurred in recent years, including being in a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position, which we exited in 2013.
Consistent with the above process, we evaluated the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets and, in the third quarter of 2013, determined that the valuation allowance against substantially all of our federal deferred tax assets and a significant portion of our state deferred tax assets was no longer required. Accordingly, we reversed $2.1 billion of valuation allowance in the third quarter. When a change in valuation allowance is recognized in an interim period, a portion of the valuation allowance to be reversed must be allocated to the remaining interim periods. Accordingly, an additional $73.7 million of the remaining valuation allowance reversed in the fourth quarter of 2013, which was offset by a tax provision based on fourth quarter earnings. At December 31, 2013, the valuation allowance relates primarily to state net operating loss carryforwards that have not met the "more likely than not" realization threshold.
We conducted our evaluation by considering all available positive and negative evidence. The principal positive evidence that led to the reversal of the valuation allowance included: (1) our emergence from a three-year cumulative loss in 2013; (2) the significant positive income we generated during 2012 and 2013, including seven consecutive quarters of pretax income as of December 31, 2013; (3) continued improvements in 2013 over recent years in other key operating metrics, including revenues, gross margin, and overhead leverage; (4) our forecasted future profitability; (5) improvement in our financial position; and (6) significant evidence that conditions in the U.S. housing industry are more favorable than in recent years and our belief that conditions will continue to be favorable over the long-term. Even if industry conditions weaken from current levels, we believe we will be able to adjust our operations to sustain long-term profitability.Section 382.
The accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Differences between estimated and actual results could result in changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets that could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws could also affect actual tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time.
Our gross federal NOL carryforward is approximately $2.1 billion, a portion of which is subject to the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. We also have significant state NOLs in various tax jurisdictions. These NOLs may generally be carried forward from 5 to 20 years, depending on the tax jurisdiction, with NOLs expiring between 2014 and 2033.

As a result of our merger with Centex in 2009, our abilitycertain realization requirements of ASC 718, the table of deferred tax assets and liabilities does not include $18.6 million of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 that arose directly from tax deductions related to use certain of Centex’s pre-ownership change NOL carryforwards and built-in losses or deductions is limited by Section 382equity compensation greater than compensation recognized for financial reporting. As a result of the Internal Revenue Code. Our Section 382 limitation is approximately $67.4adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, we expect the cumulative-effect adjustment to increase the January 1, 2017, opening retained earnings and deferred tax assets by $18.6 million per year for NOLs, losses realized on built-in loss assets that are sold within 60 months of the ownership change, and certain deductions. We do not believe that the Section 382 limitation will prevent the Company from using Centex’s pre-ownership change federal NOL carryforwards and built-in losses or deductions.these previously unrecognized excess tax benefits.

73


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Unrecognized tax benefits represent the difference between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. At December 31, 2013, weWe had $173.3$21.5 million and $39.0 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. If recognized, $14.0 million and $25.5 million, respectively, of which $21.5 million (net of federal benefit)these amounts would impact theour effective tax rate if recognized. At rate. Additionally, we had accrued interest and penalties of $12.2 million and $17.2 million at December 31, 2012, we had $170.4 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $166.3 million would impact the effective rate if recognized. 2016 and 2015, respectively.

It is reasonably possible within the next twelve months that our gross unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by up to $128.2$17.4 million,, excluding interest and penalties, primarily due to expirations of certain statutes of limitations and potential settlements. Additionally, we had accrued interestA reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2016 2015 2014
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period$38,992
 $32,911
 $173,310
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period224
 5,763
 
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period(13,218) 
 (133,883)
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
       period
114
 318
 237
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities(707) 
 (6,753)
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
       limitations
(3,903) 
 
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period$21,502
 $38,992
 $32,911

We continue to participate in the Compliance Assurance Process (“CAP”) with the IRS as an alternative to the traditional IRS examination process. As a result of our participation in CAP, federal tax years 2014 and penaltiesprior are closed. Tax year 2015 is expected to close by the second quarter of $33.1 million and $31.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our net tax-related interest and penalties totaled expense of $3.0 million in 2013 and a benefit of $5.4 million in 2012.
2017. We are also currently under examination by the IRS and various state taxing jurisdictions and anticipate finalizing certain of the examinations within the next twelve months. The final outcome of these examinations is not yet determinable. The statute of limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 20032005 to 2013.2016.

A reconciliation of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ($000’s omitted):
 2013 2012 2011
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period$170,425
 $171,863
 $258,016
Increases related to tax positions taken during a prior period12,877
 8,782
 2,699
Decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior period(7,502) (9,373) (79,719)
Increases related to tax positions taken during the current
       period
381
 11,797
 1,620
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities(1,434) 
 
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
       limitations
(1,437) (12,644) (10,753)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period$173,310
 $170,425
 $171,863



74


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


11.10. Fair value disclosures

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy can be summarized as follows: 
Level 1 Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
  
Level 2  Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, generally either quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices in markets that are not active.
  
Level 3  Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar techniques

Our assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value are summarized below ($000’s omitted): 
Financial Instrument Fair Value
Hierarchy
 Fair Value Fair Value
Hierarchy
 Fair Value
December 31,
2013
 December 31,
2012
December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
            
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:        
Residential mortgage loans available-for-sale Level 2 $287,933
 $318,931
 Level 2 $539,496
 $442,715
Interest rate lock commitments Level 2 3,139
 6,021
 Level 2 8,693
 5,574
Forward contracts Level 2 4,340
 (646) Level 2 7,081
 338
Whole loan commitments Level 2 105
 (55) Level 2 272
 13
        
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:        
House and land inventory Level 3 $
 $11,243
 Level 3 $8,920
 $11,052
        
Disclosed at fair value:        
Cash and equivalents (including restricted cash) Level 1 $1,653,044
 $1,476,710
 Level 1 $723,248
 $775,435
Financial Services debt Level 2 105,664
 138,795
 Level 2 331,621
 267,877
Term loan Level 2 
 500,000
Senior notes Level 2 2,070,744
 2,663,451
 Level 2 3,112,297
 1,643,651

Fair values for agency residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are determined based on quoted market prices for comparable instruments. Fair values for non-agency residential mortgage loans available-for-sale are determined based on purchase commitments from whole loan investors and other relevant market information available to management. Fair values for interest rate lock commitments, including the value of servicing rights, are based on market prices for similar instruments. Forward contracts on mortgage-backed securities are valued based on market prices for similar instruments. Fair values for whole loan investor commitments are based on market prices for similar instruments from the specific whole loan investor.

Certain assets are required to be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The non-recurring fair valuesvalue included in the above table above represent only those assets whose carrying values were adjusted to fair value as of the respective balance sheet dates. See Note 1 for a more detailed discussion of the valuation methods used for inventory.

The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, and Financial Services debt, the Term Loan, and the Revolving Credit Facility approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.nature and floating interest rate terms. The fair values of senior notes are based on quoted market prices, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of similar issues. The carrying value of senior notes was $2.1$3.1 billion and $2.5$1.6 billion,, at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, respectively.


75


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


12.11. Other assets and accrued and other liabilities

Other assets are presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
December 31,December 31,
2013 20122016 2015
Accounts and notes receivable (Note 1)
$137,428
 $123,268
Accounts and notes receivable:   
Insurance receivables (Note 12)
$307,344
 $362,680
Notes receivable29,111
 28,288
Other receivables90,714
 81,581
427,169
 472,549
Prepaid expenses65,965
 74,737
106,748
 109,113
Deposits and pre-acquisition costs (Note 1)
91,034
 70,116
195,436
 162,119
Property and equipment, net (Note 1)
53,051
 44,183
77,444
 86,312
Income taxes receivable35,437
 31,924
Income taxes receivable (Note 9)
9,272
 25,080
Other77,706
 63,447
41,357
 38,172
$460,621
 $407,675
$857,426
 $893,345

We record receivables from various parties in the normal course of business, including amounts due from insurance companies (see Note 12), municipalities, and vendors. In certain instances, we may accept consideration for land sales or other transactions in the form of a note receivable.

Accrued and other liabilities are presented below ($000’s omitted):
 
 December 31,
 2013 2012
Self-insurance liabilities (Note 13)
$668,100
 $721,284
Loan origination liabilities (Note 13)
124,956
 164,280
Compensation-related171,686
 119,288
Warranty (Note 13)
63,992
 64,098
Community development district obligations (Note 13)
26,124
 33,119
Liability for land, not owned, under option agreements (Note 1)
24,024
 31,066
Accrued interest22,283
 28,713
Other276,585
 256,215
 $1,377,750
 $1,418,063
 December 31,
 2016 2015
Self-insurance liabilities (Note 12)
$831,058
 $924,563
Loan origination liabilities (Note 12)
35,114
 46,381
Compensation-related liabilities123,730
 124,798
Warranty liabilities (Note 12)
66,134
 61,179
Community development district obligations (Note 12)
8,875
 11,964
Accrued interest50,793
 20,541
Limited recourse notes payable19,282
 35,336
Dividends payable29,102
 31,568
Other284,906
 260,453
 $1,448,994
 $1,516,783
 


13.

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


12. Commitments and contingencies

Leases

We lease certain property and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. The future minimum lease payments required under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 20132016, are as follows ($000’s omitted): 
Years Ending December 31,  
2014$28,116
201525,835
201622,215
201715,374
$25,349
201813,033
22,280
201920,266
202013,559
20219,188
Thereafter56,235
32,282
Total minimum lease payments (a)
$160,808
$122,924

(a)
Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $10.7 million due in the future under non-cancelable subleases.

Net rental expense for 20132016, 20122015, and 20112014 was $23.033.0 million, $24.227.7 million, and $26.725.3 million, respectively. Certain leases contain renewal or purchase options and generally provide that we pay for insurance, taxes, and maintenance.

76


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Loan origination liabilities

Our mortgage operations may be responsible for losses associated with mortgage loans originated and sold to investors in the event of errors or omissions relating to representations and warranties made by us that the loans met certain requirements, including representations as to underwriting standards, the existence of primary mortgage insurance, and the validity of certain borrower representations in connection with the loan. If a loan is determined to be faulty, we either repurchase the loans from the investors or reimburse the investors' losses (a “make-whole” payment).

In recent years, we experienced a significant increase inEstimating the required liability for these potential losses related to repurchase requests as a result of the high level of loan defaults and related losses in the mortgage industry and increasing aggressiveness by investors in presenting such claims to us. To date, the significant majority of these losses relates to loans originated in 2006 and 2007, during which period inherently riskier loan products became more common in the mortgage origination market. In 2006 and 2007, we originated $39.5 billion of loans, excluding loans originated by Centex's former subprime loan business sold by Centex in 2006. Because we generally do not retain the servicing rights to the loans we originate, information regarding the current and historical performance, credit quality, and outstanding balances of such loans is limited. Estimating these loan origination liabilities is further complicated by uncertainties surrounding numerous external factors, such as various macroeconomic factors (including unemployment rates and changes in home prices), actions taken by third parties, including the parties servicing the loans, and the U.S. federal government in its dual capacity as regulator of the U.S. mortgage industry and conservator of the government-sponsored enterprises commonly known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee the majority of mortgage loans in the U.S.

Most requests received to date relate to make-whole payments on loans that have been foreclosed. Requests undergo extensive analysis to confirm the exposure, attempt to cure the identified defect, and, when necessary, determine our liability. We establish liabilities for such anticipated losses based upon, among other things, the level of current unresolved repurchase requests, the volume of estimated probable future repurchase requests, our ability to cure the defects identified in the repurchase requests, and the severity of the estimated loss upon repurchase. Determining these estimates and the resulting liability requires a significant level of management judgment. We are generally able to cure or refute over 60%During 2015 and 2014, we reduced our loan origination liabilities by net reserve releases of the$11.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively, based on probable settlements of various repurchase requests received from investors such that we do not believe repurchases or make-whole payments will ultimately be required. For those requests that we believe will result in repurchases or make-whole payments, actual loss severities are expected to approximate 50% of the outstanding principal balance.

During 2012and 2011, we recorded provisions for losses as a change in estimate primarily to reflect projected claim volumes in excess of previous estimates. Such provisions for lossesexisting conditions. Reserves provided (released) are reflected in Financial Services expenses. Given the ongoing volatility in the mortgage industry, our lack of visibility into the current status of the review process of loans by investors, the claim volumes we continue to experience, changes in values of underlying collateral over time, and other uncertainties regarding the ultimate resolution of these claims, actual costs could differ from our current estimates.

Changes in these liabilities were as follows ($000's omitted):
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Liabilities, beginning of period$164,280
 $128,330
 $93,057
$46,381
 $58,222
 $124,956
Reserves provided
 49,025
 59,349
Reserves provided (released), net506
 (11,433) (18,604)
Payments(39,324) (13,075) (24,076)(11,773) (408) (48,130)
Liabilities, end of period$124,956
 $164,280
 $128,330
$35,114
 $46,381
 $58,222

We entered into an agreement in conjunction with the wind down of Centex's mortgage operations, which ceased loan origination activities in December 2009, that provides a guaranty for one major investor of loans originated by Centex. This guaranty provides that we will honor the potential repurchase obligations of Centex's mortgage operations related to breaches of representations and warranties in the origination of a certain pool of loans. Other than with respect to this pool of loans, our contractual repurchase obligations are limited to our mortgage subsidiaries, which are included in non-guarantor subsidiaries (see Note 14 for a discussion of non-guarantor subsidiaries).


77


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


The mortgage subsidiary of Centex also sold loans to a bank for inclusion in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBSs”) issued by the bank. In connection with these sales, Centex's mortgage subsidiary entered into agreements pursuant to which it may be required to indemnify the bank for losses incurred by investors in the RMBSs arising out of material errors or omissions in certain information provided by the mortgage subsidiary relating to the loans and loan origination process. In 2011, the bank notified us that it has been named defendant in two lawsuits alleging various violations of federal and state securities laws asserting that untrue statements of material fact were included in the registration statements used to market the sale of two RMBS transactions which included $162 million of loans originated by Centex's mortgage subsidiary. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory and/or rescissory damages on behalf of persons who purchased the securities. Neither Centex's mortgage subsidiary nor the Company is named as a defendant in these actions. We cannot yet quantify Centex's mortgage subsidiary's potential liability as a result of these indemnification obligations. We do not believe, however, that these matters will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. We are aware of six other RMBS transactions with similar indemnity provisions that include an aggregate $116 million of loans originated by Centex's mortgage subsidiary, and we are not aware of any current or threatened legal proceedings regarding those transactions.

Community development and other special district obligations

A community development district or similar development authority (“CDD”) is a unit of local government created under various state statutes that utilizes the proceeds from the sale of bonds to finance the construction or acquisition of infrastructure assets of a development. A portion of the liability associated with the bonds, including principal and interest, is assigned to each parcel of land within the development. This debt is typically paid by subsequent special assessments levied by the CDD on the landowners. Generally, we are only responsible for paying the special assessments for the period during which we are the landowner of the applicable parcels. However, in certain limited instances we record a liability for future assessments if the assessments are fixed or determinable for a fixed or determinable period.assessments. At December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, we had recorded $26.18.9 million and $33.112.0 million, respectively, in accrued liabilities for outstanding CDD obligations.

Letters of credit and surety bonds

In the normal course of business, we post letters of credit and surety bonds pursuant to certain performance-related obligations, as security for certain land option agreements, and under various insurance programs. The majority of these letters of credit and surety bonds are in support of our land development and construction obligations to various municipalities, other government agencies, and utility companies related to the construction of roads, sewers, and other infrastructure. We had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds totaling $183.1$219.1 million and $958.3 million,$1.1 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2013,2016, and $179.2$191.3 million and $1.0$1.0 billion,, respectively, at December 31, 2012.2015. In the event any such letter of credit or surety bonds are called,is drawn, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit or surety bond. We do not believe that a material amount, if any, of the letters of credit or surety bonds will be called.drawn. Our surety bonds generally do not have stated expiration dates; rather we are released from the surety bonds as the underlying contractual performance is completed. Because significant construction and development work has been performed related to the applicable projects but has not yet received final acceptance by the respective counterparties, the aggregate amount of surety bonds outstanding is in excess of the projected cost of the remaining work to be performed.

Litigation and regulatory matters

We are involved in various litigation and legal claims in the normal course of our business operations, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We are also subject to a variety of local, state, and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, mortgage lending operations, employment practices, and protection of the environment. As a result, we are subject to periodic examination or inquiry by various governmental agencies that administer these laws and regulations.


78


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


We establish liabilities for legal claims and regulatory matters when such matters are both probable of occurring and any potential loss is reasonably estimable. We accrue for such matters based on the facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revise these estimates as the matters evolve. In such cases, there may exist an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts currently accrued. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of these legal and regulatory matters, we generally cannot predict the ultimate resolution of the pending matters, the related timing, or the eventual loss. While the outcome of such contingencies cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the resolution of such matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, to the extent the liability arising from the ultimate resolution of any matter exceeds the estimates reflected in the recorded reserves relating to such matter, we could incur additional charges that could be significant. During 2016, we settled a contract dispute related to a land transaction that we terminated approximately ten years ago in response to a collapse in housing demand. As a result of the settlement, we recorded a charge of $15.0 million, which is reflected in other expense, net.

During 2013,In September 2012, Applecross Club Operations ("Applecross") filed a complaint for breach of contract and promissory estoppel in Applecross v. Pulte Homes of PA, et al. The complaint alleged that we settledinduced Applecross to purchase a number of claims relatedgolf course from us in 2010 by promising to a previously completed luxury communitybuild over 1,000 residential units in a market weplanned community located outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In September 2015, the jury in the case found in favor of Applecross and awarded damages in the amount of $20.0 million. We have since exited. The claims related to a contractual dispute with certain homeowners. Substantially allappealed the award. However, in light of these claims have been resolved. As the result of these settlements,jury’s verdict, we recorded chargesa reserve of $20.0 million in 2015, which is reflected in other expense, net.$41.2 million during 2013. We believe that the final resolution of all matters related to these claims will not vary materially from our current estimates.


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


Allowance for warranties

Home purchasers are provided with a limited warranty against certain building defects, including a one-year comprehensive limited warranty and coverage for certain other aspects of the home’s construction and operating systems for periods of up to and in limited instances exceeding 10 years. We estimate the costs to be incurred under these warranties and record liabilities in the amount of such costs at the time product revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liabilities include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and the cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of the warranty liabilities for each geographic market in which we operate and adjust the amounts as necessary. Actual warranty costs in the future could differ from the current estimates. Changes to warranty liabilities were as follows ($000’s omitted):
 
2013 2012 20112016 2015 2014
Warranty liabilities, beginning of period$64,098
 $68,025
 $80,195
$61,179
 $65,389
 $63,992
Reserves provided49,399
 45,705
 43,875
67,169
 52,684
 51,348
Payments(44,925) (45,365) (54,766)(55,892) (60,968) (47,968)
Other adjustments(4,580) (4,267) (1,279)(6,322) 4,074
 (1,983)
Warranty liabilities, end of period$63,992
 $64,098
 $68,025
$66,134
 $61,179
 $65,389

Self-insured risks

We maintain, and require our subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance coverage. We also maintain builders' risk, property, errors and omissions, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. These insurance policies protect us against a portion of the risk of loss from claims. However, we retain a significant portion of the overall risk for such claims either through policies issued by our captive insurance subsidiaries or through our own self-insured per occurrence and aggregate retentions, deductibles, and claims in excess of available insurance policy limits.

Our general liability insurance includes coverage for certain construction defects. While construction defect claims can relate to a variety of circumstances, the majority of our claims relate to alleged problems with siding, plumbing, foundations and other concrete work, windows, roofing, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. The availability of general liability insurance for the homebuilding industry and its subcontractors has become increasingly limited, and the insurance policies available require companies to maintain significant per occurrence and aggregate retention levels. In certain instances, we may offer our subcontractors the opportunity to purchase insurance through one of our captive insurance subsidiaries or to participate in a project-specific insurance program provided by the Company.us. Policies issued by the captive insurance subsidiaries represent self-insurance of these risks by the Company.us. This self-insured exposure is limited by reinsurance policies that we purchase. General liability coverage for the homebuilding industry is complex, and our coverage varies from policy year to policy year. Our insurance coverage requires a per occurrence deductible up to an overall aggregate retention level. Beginning with the first dollar, amounts paid onto satisfy insured claims satisfyapply to our per occurrence and aggregate retention obligations. Any amounts incurred in excess of the occurrence or aggregate retention levels are covered by insurance up to our purchased coverage levels. Our insurance policies, including the captive insurance subsidiaries' reinsurance policies, are maintained with highly-rated underwriters for whom we believe counterparty default risk is not significant.

79


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)



At any point in time, we are managing over 1,000 individual claims related to general liability, property, errors and omission, workers compensation, and other business insurance coverage. We reserve for costs associated with such claims (including expected claims management expenses) on an undiscounted basis at the time revenue is recognized for each home closing and evaluate the recorded liabilities based on actuarial analyses of our historical claims. The actuarial analyses calculate estimates of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses, including estimates for incurred but not reported losses ("IBNR"). IBNR represents losses related to claims incurred but not yet reported plus development on reported claims. These

Housing market conditions have been volatile across most of our markets over the past ten years, and we believe such conditions can affect the frequency and cost of construction defect claims. Additionally, IBNR estimates comprise a significant portionthe majority of our liability and are subject to a high degree of uncertainty due to a variety of factors, including changes in claims reporting and resolution patterns, third party recoveries, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent. State regulations vary, but construction defect claims are reported and resolved over an extended period often exceeding ten years. Changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and estimates of specific claim

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Additionally, the amount of insurance coverage available for each policy period also impacts our recorded reserves. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses and the timing of such losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs.

Adjustments to reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. During 2016 and 2015, we reduced general liability reserves by $55.2 million and $29.6 million, respectively, as a result of changes in estimates resulting from actual claim experience observed being less than anticipated in previous actuarial projections. During 2015, we also recorded a general liability reserve reversal of $32.6 million, resulting from a legal settlement relating to plumbing claims initially reported to us in 2008 and for which our recorded liabilities were adjusted over time based on changes in facts and circumstances. These claims ultimately resulted in a class action lawsuit involving a national vendor and numerous other homebuilders, homebuyers, and insurance companies. In 2015, a global settlement was reached, pursuant to which we funded our agreed upon share of settlement costs, which were significantly lower than our previously estimated exposure. During 2014, we increased general liability insurance reserves by $69.3 million, which was primarily driven by estimated costs associated with siding repairs in certain instances, we havepreviously completed communities.

The changes in actuarial estimates in 2016, 2015, and 2014 were driven by changes in actual claims experience that, in turn, impacted actuarial estimates for potential future claims. These changes in actuarial estimates did not involve any changes in actuarial methodology but did impact the abilitydevelopment of estimates for future periods, which resulted in adjustments to recover athe IBNR portion of our costs under various insurance policies or from subcontractors or other third parties. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable.liabilities.

Our recorded reserves for all such claims totaled $668.1$831.1 million and $721.3$924.6 million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, the vast majority of which relatesrelate to general liability claims. The recorded reserves include loss estimates related to both (i) existing claims and related claim expenses and (ii) IBNR and related claim expenses. Liabilities related to IBNR and related claim expenses represented approximately 78%70% and 74% of the total general liability reserves at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. The actuarial analyses that determinewe use in the determination of the IBNR portion of reserves consider a variety of factors, including the frequency and severity of losses, which are based on our historical claims experience supplemented by relevant industry data. The actuarial analyses of the reserves also consider historical third party recovery rates and claims management expenses.

Adjustments to reserves are recorded in the period in which the change in estimate occurs. Because the majority of our reserves relate to IBNR, adjustments to reserve amounts for individual existing claims generally do not impact the recorded reserves materially. However, changes in the frequency and timing of reported claims and estimates of specific claim values can impact the underlying inputs and trends utilized in the actuarial analyses, which could have a material impact on the recorded reserves. Because of the inherent uncertainty in estimating future losses related to these claims, actual costs could differ significantly from estimated costs. Costs associated with our insurance programs are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses. Changes in these liabilities were as follows ($000's omitted):
2013 2012 20112016 2015
Balance, beginning of period$721,284
 $739,029
 $787,918
$924,563
 $995,692
Reserves provided64,737
 54,262
 48,359
Payments(117,921) (72,007) (97,248)
Net reserves provided40,784
 16,085
Payments, net (a)
(134,289) (87,214)
Balance, end of period$668,100
 $721,284
 $739,029
$831,058
 $924,563

The reserves provided(a) Includes net changes in amounts expected to be recovered from our insurance carriers, which are recorded to other assets (see below).

In certain instances, we have the ability to recover a portion of our costs under various insurance policies. Estimates of such amounts are recorded when recovery is considered probable. As reflected in Note 11, our receivables from insurance carriers totaled $307.3 million and $362.7 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The insurance receivables relate to costs incurred or to be incurred to perform corrective repairs, settle claims with customers, and other costs related to the continued progression of both known and anticipated future construction defect claims that we believe to be insured related to previously closed homes. Given the complexity inherent with resolving construction defect claims in the homebuilding industry as described above, there generally exists a significant lag between our payment of claims and our reimbursements from applicable insurance carriers. In addition, disputes between homebuilders and carriers over coverage positions relating to construction defect claims are common. Resolution of claims with carriers involves the exchange of significant amounts of information and frequently involves legal action. Currently, we are the plaintiff in litigation with certain of our insurance carriers in regard to $113.6 million of recorded insurance receivables relating to the applicability of coverage to such costs under their policies.

We believe collection of these insurance receivables, including those in litigation, is probable based on the legal merits of our positions after review by legal counsel, favorable legal rulings received to date, the credit quality of our carriers, and our long history of collecting significant amounts of insurance reimbursements under similar insurance

PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


policies related to similar claims, including significant amounts funded by the above table are classified within selling, general, and administrative expenses.carriers under different policies. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the resolution of such matters will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

14.
13. Supplemental Guarantor information

All of our senior notes are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior basis by eachcertain of the Company'sour wholly-owned Homebuilding subsidiaries and certain other wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”). Such guaranties are full and unconditional. SupplementalOur subsidiaries comprising the Financial Services segment along with certain other subsidiaries (collectively, the "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries") do not guarantee the senior notes. In accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, supplemental consolidating financial information of the Company, including such information for the Guarantors, is presented below. Investments in subsidiaries are presented using the equity method of accounting. Separate financial statements of the Guarantors are not provided as the consolidating financial information contained herein provides a more meaningful disclosure to allow investors to determine the nature of the assets held by, and the operations of, the combined groups.    



80


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 20132016
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
ASSETS                  
Cash and equivalents$262,364
 $1,188,999
 $128,966
 $
 $1,580,329
$
 $588,353
 $110,529
 $
 $698,882
Restricted cash58,699
 2,635
 11,381
 
 72,715

 22,832
 1,534
 
 24,366
Total cash, cash equivalents, and
restricted cash

 611,185
 112,063
 
 723,248
House and land inventory
 3,977,851
 710
 
 3,978,561

 6,707,392
 63,263
 
 6,770,655
Land held for sale
 60,701
 1,034
 
 61,735

 31,218
 510
 
 31,728
Land, not owned, under option
agreements

 24,024
 
 
 24,024
Residential mortgage loans available-
for-sale

 
 287,933
 
 287,933

 
 539,496
 
 539,496
Investments in unconsolidated entities68
 41,319
 3,936
 
 45,323
105
 46,248
 5,094
 
 51,447
Other assets50,251
 359,228
 51,142
 
 460,621
12,364
 716,923
 128,139
 
 857,426
Intangible assets
 136,148
 
 
 136,148

 154,792
 
 
 154,792
Deferred tax assets, net2,074,137
 17
 12,600
 
 2,086,754
1,051,351
 
 (1,943) 
 1,049,408
Investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany accounts, net
4,532,950
 (16,513) 5,939,784
 (10,456,221) 
6,835,075
 (376,748) 6,845,781
 (13,304,108) 
$6,978,469
 $5,774,409
 $6,437,486
 $(10,456,221) $8,734,143
$7,898,895
 $7,891,010
 $7,692,403
 $(13,304,108) $10,178,200
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                  
Liabilities:                  
Accounts payable, customer deposits,
accrued and other liabilities
$65,334
 $1,413,752
 $236,258
 $
 $1,715,344
$94,656
 $1,755,756
 $191,928
 $
 $2,042,340
Income tax liabilities206,015
 
 
 
 206,015
34,860
 
 
 
 34,860
Financial Services debt
 
 105,664
 
 105,664

 
 331,621
 
 331,621
Senior notes2,058,168
 
 
 
 2,058,168
3,110,016
 
 
 
 3,110,016
Total liabilities2,329,517
 1,413,752
 341,922
 
 4,085,191
3,239,532
 1,755,756
 523,549
 
 5,518,837
Total shareholders’ equity4,648,952
 4,360,657
 6,095,564
 (10,456,221) 4,648,952
4,659,363
 6,135,254
 7,168,854
 (13,304,108) 4,659,363
$6,978,469
 $5,774,409
 $6,437,486
 $(10,456,221) $8,734,143
$7,898,895
 $7,891,010
 $7,692,403
 $(13,304,108) $10,178,200

81


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup,
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
ASSETS  
 
      
 
    
Cash and equivalents$146,168
 $1,063,943
 $194,649
 $
 $1,404,760
$
 $638,602
 $115,559
 $
 $754,161
Restricted cash54,546
 3,365
 14,039
 
 71,950

 20,274
 1,000
 
 21,274
Total cash, cash equivalents, and
restricted cash

 658,876
 116,559
 
 775,435
House and land inventory
 4,210,201
 3,845
 
 4,214,046

 5,450,058
 
 
 5,450,058
Land held for sale
 91,104
 
 
 91,104

 80,458
 1,034
 
 81,492
Land, not owned, under option
agreements

 31,066
 
 
 31,066
Residential mortgage loans available-
for-sale

 
 318,931
 
 318,931

 
 442,715
 
 442,715
Investments in unconsolidated entities1,528
 40,973
 3,128
 
 45,629
93
 36,499
 4,675
 
 41,267
Other assets28,951
 324,109
 54,615
 
 407,675
38,991
 763,630
 90,724
 
 893,345
Intangible assets
 149,248
 
 
 149,248

 110,215
 
 
 110,215
Investments in subsidiaries and
�� intercompany accounts, net
4,723,466
 7,198,710
 6,296,915
 (18,219,091) 
Deferred tax assets, net1,392,251
 11
 2,617
 
 1,394,879
Investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany accounts, net
5,529,606
 465,644
 6,293,018
 (12,288,268) 
$4,954,659
 $13,112,719
 $6,886,122
 $(18,219,091) $6,734,409
$6,960,941
 $7,565,391
 $6,951,342
 $(12,288,268) $9,189,406
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                  
Liabilities:                  
Accounts payable, customer deposits,
accrued and other liabilities
$56,565
 $1,343,653
 $297,302
 $
 $1,697,520
$70,061
 $1,791,395
 $169,193
 $
 $2,030,649
Income tax liabilities198,865
 
 
 
 198,865
57,050
 
 
 
 57,050
Financial Services debt
 
 138,795
 
 138,795

 
 267,877
 
 267,877
Term loan498,423
 
 
 
 498,423
Senior notes2,509,613
 
 
 
 2,509,613
1,576,082
 
 
 
 1,576,082
Total liabilities2,765,043
 1,343,653
 436,097
 
 4,544,793
2,201,616
 1,791,395
 437,070
 
 4,430,081
Total shareholders’ equity2,189,616
 11,769,066
 6,450,025
 (18,219,091) 2,189,616
4,759,325
 5,773,996
 6,514,272
 (12,288,268) 4,759,325
$4,954,659
 $13,112,719
 $6,886,122
 $(18,219,091) $6,734,409
$6,960,941
 $7,565,391
 $6,951,342
 $(12,288,268) $9,189,406


82


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20132016
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $5,424,309
 $
 $
 $5,424,309
$
 $7,427,757
 $23,558
 $
 $7,451,315
Land sale revenues
 114,335
 
 
 114,335

 33,598
 2,437
 
 36,035

 5,538,644
 
 
 5,538,644

 7,461,355
 25,995
 
 7,487,350
Financial Services
 2,353
 138,598
 
 140,951

 
 181,126
 
 181,126

 5,540,997
 138,598
 
 5,679,595

 7,461,355
 207,121
 
 7,668,476
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 4,310,528
 
 
 4,310,528

 (5,566,653) (21,321) 
 (5,587,974)
Land sale cost of revenues
 104,426
 
 
 104,426

 (30,156) (1,959) 
 (32,115)

 4,414,954
 
 
 4,414,954

 (5,596,809) (23,280) 
 (5,620,089)
Financial Services expenses832
 970
 90,577
 
 92,379

 (533) (108,040) 
 (108,573)
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses

 573,904
 (5,404) 
 568,500

 (907,748) (49,402) 
 (957,150)
Other expense, net26,870
 49,681
 4,202
 
 80,753
(1,321) (69,345) 21,852
 
 (48,814)
Interest income(349) (3,954) (92) 
 (4,395)
Interest expense712
 
 
 
 712
Intercompany interest17,518
 (8,260) (9,258) 
 
(1,980) 
 1,980
 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
1,461
 (1,783) (808) 
 (1,130)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(47,044) 515,485
 59,381
 
 527,822
(3,301) 886,920
 50,231
 
 933,850
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,113,827) (799) 22,332
 
 (2,092,294)
Income (loss) before equity in income
�� (loss) of subsidiaries
2,066,783
 516,284
 37,049
 
 2,620,116
Income tax (expense) benefit1,254
 (312,486) (19,915) 
 (331,147)
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(2,047) 574,434
 30,316
 
 602,703
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries553,333
 35,086
 485,400
 (1,073,819) 
604,750
 58,078
 457,716
 (1,120,544) 
Net income (loss)2,620,116
 551,370
 522,449
 (1,073,819) 2,620,116
602,703
 632,512
 488,032
 (1,120,544) 602,703
Other comprehensive income (loss)197
 
 
 
 197
83
 
 
 
 83
Comprehensive income (loss)$2,620,313
 $551,370
 $522,449
 $(1,073,819) $2,620,313
$602,786
 $632,512
 $488,032
 $(1,120,544) $602,786


83


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $4,552,412
 $
 $
 $4,552,412
$
 $5,792,675
 $
 $
 $5,792,675
Land sale revenues
 106,698
 
 
 106,698

 48,536
 
 
 48,536

 4,659,110
 
 
 4,659,110

 5,841,211
 
 
 5,841,211
Financial Services
 2,082
 158,806
 
 160,888

 1
 140,752
 
 140,753

 4,661,192
 158,806
 
 4,819,998

 5,841,212
 140,752
 
 5,981,964
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 3,833,451
 
 
 3,833,451

 (4,235,945) 
 
 (4,235,945)
Land sale cost of revenues
 94,880
 
 
 94,880

 (35,858) 
 
 (35,858)

 3,928,331
 
 
 3,928,331

 (4,271,803) 
 
 (4,271,803)
Financial Services expenses379
 567
 134,565
 
 135,511
(313) 276
 (82,010) 
 (82,047)
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses

 515,283
 (826) 
 514,457
(3) (790,818) (3,907) 
 (794,728)
Other expense, net32,027
 33,506
 765
 
 66,298
(760) (17,424) 821
 
 (17,363)
Interest income(229) (4,597) (87) 
 (4,913)
Interest expense819
 
 
 
 819
Intercompany interest587,281
 (573,852) (13,429) 
 
(2,110) (7,922) 10,032
 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
(1) (3,555) (503) 
 (4,059)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(620,276) 765,509
 38,321
 
 183,554
(3,186) 753,521
 65,688
 
 816,023
Income tax expense (benefit)426
 (22,299) (718) 
 (22,591)
Income tax (expense) benefit1,210
 (297,485) (25,658) 
 (321,933)
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(620,702) 787,808
 39,039
 
 206,145
(1,976) 456,036
 40,030
 
 494,090
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries826,847
 34,596
 476,806
 (1,338,249) 
496,066
 40,484
 411,699
 (948,249) 
Net income (loss)206,145
 822,404
 515,845
 (1,338,249) 206,145
494,090
 496,520
 451,729
 (948,249) 494,090
Other comprehensive income (loss)314
 
 
 
 314
81
 
 
 
 81
Comprehensive income (loss)$206,459
 $822,404
 $515,845
 $(1,338,249) $206,459
$494,171
 $496,520
 $451,729
 $(948,249) $494,171

84


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the year ended December 31, 20112014
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
Unconsolidated Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Revenues:                  
Homebuilding                  
Home sale revenues$
 $3,950,743
 $
 $
 $3,950,743
$
 $5,662,171
 $
 $
 $5,662,171
Land sale revenues
 82,853
 
 
 82,853

 34,554
 
 
 34,554

 4,033,596
 
 
 4,033,596

 5,696,725
 
 
 5,696,725
Financial Services
 1,367
 101,727
 
 103,094

 889
 124,749
 
 125,638

 4,034,963
 101,727
 
 4,136,690

 5,697,614
 124,749
 
 5,822,363
Homebuilding Cost of Revenues:                  
Home sale cost of revenues
 3,444,398
 
 
 3,444,398

 (4,149,674) 
 
 (4,149,674)
Land sale cost of revenues
 59,279
 
 
 59,279

 (23,748) 
 
 (23,748)

 3,503,677
 
 
 3,503,677

 (4,173,422) 
 
 (4,173,422)
Financial Services expenses343
 448
 136,875
 
 137,666
(784) 130
 (70,403) 
 (71,057)
Selling, general, and administrative
expenses
33,144
 488,746
 (2,307) 
 519,583

 (854,883) (6,507) 
 (861,390)
Other expense (income), net5,581
 288,298
 (777) 
 293,102
Interest income(253) (4,443) (359) 
 (5,055)
Interest expense1,313
 
 
 
 1,313
Other expense, net(9,026) (16,847) (863) 
 (26,736)
Intercompany interest39,060
 (27,572) (11,488) 
 
(9,800) 90
 9,710
 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of
unconsolidated entities
(5) (3,196) (95) 
 (3,296)
Income (loss) before income taxes and
equity in income (loss) of
subsidiaries
(79,183) (210,995) (20,122) 
 (310,300)(19,610) 652,682
 56,686
 
 689,758
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,623) (99,635) 2,346
 
 (99,912)
Income tax (expense) benefit7,473
 (201,332) (21,561) 
 (215,420)
Income (loss) before equity in income
(loss) of subsidiaries
(76,560) (111,360) (22,468) 
 (210,388)(12,137) 451,350
 35,125
 
 474,338
Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries(133,828) (25,427) (88,998) 248,253
 
486,475
 38,534
 403,505
 (928,514) 
Net income (loss)(210,388) (136,787) (111,466) 248,253
 (210,388)474,338
 489,884
 438,630
 (928,514) 474,338
Other comprehensive income (loss)213
 
 
 
 213
105
 
 
 
 105
Comprehensive income (loss)$(210,175) $(136,787) $(111,466) $248,253
 $(210,175)$474,443
 $489,884
 $438,630
 $(928,514) $474,443

85


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20132016
($000’s omitted)
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
$(41) $865,267
 $15,910
 $
 $881,136
$256,722
 $(102,054) $(86,398) $
 $68,270
Cash flows from investing activities:                  
Distributions from unconsolidated
entities

 1,001
 
 
 1,001
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (1,677) 
 
 (1,677)
Net change in loans held for investment
 
 (12,265) 
 (12,265)
Change in restricted cash related to
letters of credit
(4,152) 
 
 
 (4,152)
Proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment

 15
 
 
 15
Capital expenditures
 (26,472) (2,427) 
 (28,899)
 (36,297) (2,998) 
 (39,295)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
 (14,539) 
 
 (14,539)
Cash used for business acquisition
 (430,458) 
 
 (430,458)
Other investing activities, net
 11,189
 1,911
 
 13,100
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
(4,152) (27,133) (14,692) 
 (45,977)
 (470,105) (1,087) 
 (471,192)
Cash flows from financing activities:                  
Financial Services borrowings
(repayments)

 
 (33,131) 
 (33,131)
 
 63,744
 
 63,744
Other borrowings (repayments)(485,048) 5,221
 

 
 (479,827)
Proceeds from debt issuance1,991,937
 4,000
 
 
 1,995,937
Repayments of debt(965,245) (21,235) (439) 
 (986,919)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility619,000
 
 
 
 619,000
Repayments under revolving credit facility(619,000) 
 
 
 (619,000)
Stock option exercises19,411
 
 
 
 19,411
5,845
 
 
 
 5,845
Stock repurchases(127,661) 
 
 
 (127,661)
Share repurchases(603,206) 
 
 
 (603,206)
Dividends paid(38,382) 
 
 
 (38,382)(124,666) 
 
 
 (124,666)
Intercompany activities, net752,069
 (718,299) (33,770) 
 
(561,387) 541,703
 19,684
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
120,389
 (713,078) (66,901) 
 (659,590)(256,722) 524,468
 82,989
 
 350,735
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
equivalents
116,196
 125,056
 (65,683) 
 175,569
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year146,168
 1,063,943
 194,649
 
 1,404,760
Cash and equivalents at end of year$262,364
 $1,188,999
 $128,966
 $
 $1,580,329
Net increase (decrease)
 (47,691) (4,496) 
 (52,187)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
at beginning of year

 658,876
 116,559
 
 775,435
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
at end of year
$
 $611,185
 $112,063
 $
 $723,248


86


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20122015
($000’s omitted)
 Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   operating activities
$(582,762) $1,332,342
 $10,560
 $
 $760,140
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Distributions from unconsolidated
     entities

 3,029
 
 
 3,029
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (16,456) 
 
 (16,456)
Net change in loans held for investment
 
 836
 
 836
Change in restricted cash related to
     letters of credit
28,653
 
 
 
 28,653
Proceeds from the sale of property and
     equipment

 7,586
 
 
 7,586
Capital expenditures
 (10,831) (3,111) 
 (13,942)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
   activities
28,653
 (16,672) (2,275) 
 9,706
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Financial Services borrowings
     (repayments)

 
 138,795
 
 138,795
Other borrowings (repayments)(620,700) 1,900
 
 
 (618,800)
Stock option exercises32,809
 
 
 
 32,809
Stock repurchases(961) 
 
 
 (961)
Intercompany activities, net1,169,842
 (1,129,188) (40,654) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   financing activities
580,990
 (1,127,288) 98,141
 
 (448,157)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
   equivalents
26,881
 188,382
 106,426
 
 321,689
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year119,287
 875,561
 88,223
 
 1,083,071
Cash and equivalents at end of year$146,168
 $1,063,943
 $194,649
 $
 $1,404,760
 Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, Inc.
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   operating activities
$185,946
 $(430,940) $(92,596) $
 $(337,590)
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Capital expenditures
 (41,857) (3,583) 
 (45,440)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
 (454) 
 
 (454)
Cash used for business acquisitions
 
 
 
 
Other investing activities, net
 2,391
 8,939
 
 11,330
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
   activities

 (39,920) 5,356
 
 (34,564)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Financial Services borrowings
     (repayments)

 
 127,636
 
 127,636
Proceeds from debt issuance498,087
 
 
 
 498,087
Repayments of debt(237,995) (1,198) 
 
 (239,193)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility125,000
 
 
 
 125,000
Repayments under revolving credit facility(125,000) 
 
 
 (125,000)
Stock option exercises10,535
 
 
 
 10,535
Share repurchases(442,738) 
 
 
 (442,738)
Dividends paid(115,958) 
 
 
 (115,958)
Intercompany activities, net90,959
 (27,886) (63,073) 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   financing activities
(197,110) (29,084) 64,563
 
 (161,631)
Net increase (decrease)(11,164) (499,944) (22,677) 
 (533,785)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
     at beginning of year
11,164
 1,158,820
 139,236
 
 1,309,220
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
     at end of year
$
 $658,876
 $116,559
 $
 $775,435

87


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended December 31, 20112014
($000’s omitted)
 Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   operating activities
$(86,000) $520,024
 $(416,745) $
 $17,279
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Distributions from unconsolidated
     entities

 4,531
 
 
 4,531
Investments in unconsolidated entities
 (4,603) 
 
 (4,603)
Net change in loans held for
     investment

 
 325
 
 325
Change in restricted cash related to
     letters of credit
(83,199) 
 
 
 (83,199)
Proceeds from the sale of property and
     equipment

 10,555
 
 
 10,555
Capital expenditures
 (18,331) (2,907) 
 (21,238)
Net cash provided by (used in)
   investing activities
(83,199) (7,848) (2,582) 
 (93,629)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Other borrowings (repayments)(320,973) (160) 
 
 (321,133)
Stock repurchases(2,836) 
 
 
 (2,836)
Intercompany activities, net602,295
 (743,078) 140,783
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   financing activities
278,486
 (743,238) 140,783
 
 (323,969)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
   equivalents
109,287
 (231,062) (278,544) 
 (400,319)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of
   year
10,000
 1,106,623
 366,767
 
 1,483,390
Cash and equivalents at end of year$119,287
 $875,561
 $88,223
 $
 $1,083,071
 Unconsolidated   Consolidated
PulteGroup, 
Inc.
 PulteGroup,
Inc.
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   operating activities
$206,485
 $174,293
 $(72,897) $
 $307,881
Cash flows from investing activities:         
Capital expenditures
 (44,956) (3,834) 
 (48,790)
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
 
 (9) 
 (9)
Cash used for business acquisitions
 (82,419) 
 
 (82,419)
Other investing activities, net
 8,274
 331
 
 8,605
Net cash provided by (used in)
   investing activities

 (119,101) (3,512) 
 (122,613)
Cash flows from financing activities:         
Financial Services borrowings (repayments)
 
 34,577
 
 34,577
Repayments of debt(249,765) (866) 
 
 (250,631)
Stock option exercises15,627
 
 
 
 15,627
Share repurchases(253,019) 
 
 
 (253,019)
Dividends paid(75,646) 
 
 
 (75,646)
Intercompany activities, net46,419
 (87,140) 40,721
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in)
   financing activities
(516,384) (88,006) 75,298
 
 (529,092)
Net increase (decrease)(309,899) (32,814) (1,111) 
 (343,824)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
     at beginning of year
321,063
 1,191,634
 140,347
 
 1,653,044
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
     at end of year
$11,164
 $1,158,820
 $139,236
 $
 $1,309,220


88


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


15.14. Quarterly results (unaudited)
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (b)
1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (a)
2013         
2016         
Homebuilding:                  
Revenues$1,125,883
 $1,240,060
 $1,547,742
 $1,624,959
 $5,538,644
$1,396,730
 $1,756,832
 $1,894,885
 $2,438,903
 $7,487,350
Cost of revenues923,488
 1,011,528
 1,230,070
 1,249,868
 4,414,954
(1,040,056) (1,314,972) (1,429,133) (1,835,928) (5,620,089)
Income before income taxes (a)(b)
68,037
 21,971
 163,594
 225,511
 479,113
108,433
 172,546
 191,063
 388,724
 860,766
Financial Services:                  
Revenues$36,873
 $39,362
 $34,336
 $30,380
 $140,951
$35,848
 $43,082
 $48,020
 $54,175
 $181,126
Income before income taxes14,313
 16,359
 11,128
 6,909
 48,709
9,780
 17,034
 21,272
 24,997
 73,084
Consolidated results:                  
Revenues$1,162,756
 $1,279,422
 $1,582,078
 $1,655,339
 $5,679,595
$1,432,578
 $1,799,914
 $1,942,905
 $2,493,078
 $7,668,476
Income before income taxes82,350
 38,330
 174,722
 232,420
 527,822
118,213
 189,580
 212,335
 413,721
 933,850
Income tax expense (benefit) (c)
588
 1,913
 (2,107,162) 12,367
 (2,092,294)
Income tax expense(34,913) (71,820) (83,865) (140,549) (331,147)
Net income$81,762
 $36,417
 $2,281,884
 $220,053
 $2,620,116
$83,300
 $117,760
 $128,470
 $273,172
 $602,703
Net income per share:                  
Basic$0.21
 $0.09
 $5.92
 $0.58
 $6.79
$0.24
 $0.34
 $0.37
 $0.83
 $1.76
Diluted$0.21
 $0.09
 $5.87
 $0.57
 $6.72
$0.24
 $0.34
 $0.37
 $0.83
 $1.75
Number of shares used in calculation:                  
Basic384,228
 385,389
 382,883
 379,879
 383,077
347,815
 345,240
 340,171
 325,975
 339,747
Effect of dilutive securities6,093
 5,791
 3,220
 3,845
 3,789
2,662
 2,759
 2,250
 1,834
 2,376
Diluted390,321
 391,180
 386,103
 383,724
 386,866
350,477
 347,999
 342,421
 327,809
 342,123

(a)Homebuilding income before income taxes in the 2nd Quarter includes charges totaling $66.6 million consisting of losses on debt retirements, costs associated with the relocation of our corporate headquarters, and a contractual dispute related to a previously completed luxury community.
(b)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.
(c)
Income tax expense (benefit) in the 3rd Quarter includes a benefit of $2.1 billionrelated to the reversal of substantially all of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our deferred tax assets.

89


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (c)
2012         
Homebuilding:         
Revenues$852,184
 $1,033,154
 $1,255,327
 $1,518,445
 $4,659,110
Cost of revenues745,563
 876,990
 1,044,765
 1,261,012
 3,928,331
Income (loss) before income taxes (a)
(20,352) 23,939
 79,179
 75,225
 157,991
Financial Services:         
Revenues$28,852
 $36,251
 $47,264
 $48,521
 $160,888
Income (loss) before income taxes (b)
6,861
 15,987
 26,727
 (24,012) 25,563
Consolidated results:         
Revenues$881,036
 $1,069,405
 $1,302,591
 $1,566,966
 $4,819,998
Income (loss) before income taxes(13,491) 39,926
 105,906
 51,213
 183,554
Income tax expense (benefit)(1,825) (2,510) (10,727) (7,529) (22,591)
Net income (loss)$(11,666) $42,436
 $116,633
 $58,742
 $206,145
Net income (loss) per share:         
Basic$(0.03) $0.11
 $0.31
 $0.15
 $0.54
Diluted$(0.03) $0.11
 $0.30
 $0.15
 $0.54
Number of shares used in calculation:         
Basic380,502
 380,655
 381,355
 383,404
 381,562
Effect of dilutive securities
 1,548
 3,215
 5,900
 3,002
Diluted380,502
 382,203
 384,570
 389,304
 384,564
(a)
Homebuilding income (loss) before income taxes includes losses on debt retirements of $32.1 million in the 4th Quarter.
(b)
Financial Services income (loss) before income taxes includes additional loan origination reserves of $49.0 million in the 4th Quarter.
(c)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.

(b)
Homebuilding income before income taxes includes a charge of $15.0 million in the 3rd Quarter related to the settlement of a disputed land transaction (see Note 12) and an adjustment to general liability insurance reserves relating to a reserve reversal of $55.2 million in the 4th Quarter.


90


PULTEGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)


UNAUDITED QUARTERLY INFORMATION
(000’s omitted, except per share data)
 1st
Quarter
 2nd
Quarter
 3rd
Quarter
 4th
Quarter
 
Total (a)
2015         
Homebuilding:         
Revenues$1,105,700
 $1,249,537
 $1,467,780
 $2,018,194
 $5,841,211
Cost of revenues(816,368) (915,151) (1,070,231) (1,470,053) (4,271,803)
Income before income taxes (b)
90,748
 157,640
 164,911
 344,019
 757,317
Financial Services:         
Revenues$27,598
 $30,754
 $38,967
 $43,434
 $140,753
Income before income taxes (c)
5,057
 9,987
 14,365
 29,296
 58,706
Consolidated results:         
Revenues$1,133,298
 $1,280,291
 $1,506,747
 $2,061,628
 $5,981,964
Income before income taxes95,805
 167,627
 179,276
 373,315
 816,023
Income tax expense(40,834) (64,303) (71,507) (145,288) (321,933)
Net income$54,971
 $103,324
 $107,769
 $228,027
 $494,090
Net income per share:         
Basic$0.15
 $0.28
 $0.31
 $0.65
 $1.38
Diluted$0.15
 $0.28
 $0.30
 $0.64
 $1.36
Number of shares used in calculation:         
Basic366,748
 361,009
 350,147
 348,699
 356,576
Effect of dilutive securities3,362
 3,232
 3,225
 3,047
 3,217
Diluted370,110
 364,241
 353,372
 351,746
 359,793
(a)Due to rounding, the sum of quarterly results may not equal the total for the year. Additionally, quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently.

(b)
Homebuilding income before income taxes includes reserve reversals resulting from a legal settlement (see Note 12)of $26.9 million and $5.7 million in the 2nd and 3rd Quarters, respectively; a charge of $20.0 million in the 3rd Quarter related to the Applecross matter (see Note 12); and a reversal of $29.6 million relating to decreased general liability insurance reserves in the 4th Quarter.

(c)Financial Services expenses in the 1st Quarter includes a reduction in loan origination liabilities totaling $11.4 million.




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PulteGroup, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PulteGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PulteGroup, Inc. at December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PulteGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 Framework) and our report dated February 5, 20141, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, MichiganAtlanta, Georgia
February 5, 20141, 2017


91




ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

This Item is not applicable.

ITEM 9A.      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20132016. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 20132016.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

(a)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgments and estimates concerning events and transactions that are accounted for or disclosed.

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management recognizes that there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control and effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Additionally, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.

In order to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly assesses such controls and did so most recently for its financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016. Management’s assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, management asserts that the Company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, has issued its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016.

92




(b)Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PulteGroup, Inc.

We have audited PulteGroup, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992(2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). PulteGroup, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, PulteGroup, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PulteGroup, Inc. as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016 and our report dated February��5, 2014February 1, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, MichiganAtlanta, Georgia
February 5, 20141, 2017




(c)Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20132016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.      OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

This Item is not applicable.

93



PART III

ITEM 10.      DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this Item with respect to our executive officers is set forth in Item 4A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information required by this Item with respect to members of our Board of Directors and with respect to our audit committee will be contained in the Proxy Statement for the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“20142017 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2016, under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Committees of the Board of Directors - Audit Committee” and in the chart disclosing Audit Committee membership and is incorporated herein by this reference. Information required by this Item with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the caption “Beneficial Security Ownership - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and is incorporated herein by this reference. Information required by this Item with respect to our code of ethics will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the caption “Corporate Governance - Governance Guidelines; Code of Ethical Business Conduct; Code of Ethics” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Our code of ethics for principal officers, our code of ethical business conduct, our corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Governance, and Finance and Investment committees of our Board of Directors are also posted on our website and are available in print, free of charge, upon request.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the captions “20132016 Executive Compensation” and “20132016 Director Compensation” and is incorporated herein by this reference, provided that the Compensation and Management Development Committee Report shall not be deemed to be “filed” with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLER MATTERS

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the captions “Beneficial Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Election of Directors - Independence” and is incorporated herein by this reference.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item will be contained in the 20142017 Proxy Statement under the captions “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Preapproval Policies” and is incorporated herein by reference.

94




PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 (a)
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1)    Financial Statements
 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted because the required information is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibit Number and Description
(3) (a) Restated Articles of Incorporation, of PulteGroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009)
     
  (b) Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated March 18, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
     
  (c) Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, dated May 21, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010)
     
  (d) By-laws, as amended, of PulteGroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 8, 2009)May 6, 2016)
     
  (e) Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares, dated August 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of our Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the SEC on August 18, 2009)
     
(4) (a) Any instrument with respect to long-term debt, where the securities authorized thereunder do not exceed 10% of the total assets of PulteGroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries, has not been filed. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the SEC upon request.
     
  (b) Amended and Restated Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2010, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent, which includes the Form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of PulteGroup, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on March 23, 2010)
     
  (c) First Amendment to Amended and Restated Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2013, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-14.1 of ourPulteGroup, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2013)
     
(10) (a)(d) 1995 Stock Incentive Plan for Key EmployeesSecond Amendment to Amended and Restated Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2016, between PulteGroup, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated March 31, 1995, and as Exhibit 4.1 of our Registration StatementPulteGroup, Inc.’s Current Report on Form S-8, Registration No. 33-99218)8-K, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016)
     


(10) (b)(a) PulteGroup, Inc. 401(k) Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-115570)
     

95



  (c)Facility Agreement dated as of June 23, 2009 among PulteGroup, Inc., Various Financial Institutions, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2009)
(d)PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-66284)
(e)PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-66284)
(f)(b) PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated April 3, 2002 and as Exhibit 4.3 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-123223)
     
  (g)(c) PulteGroup, Inc. 2008 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement dated April 7, 2008)
     
  (h)(d) PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2013)
     
  (i)(e) PulteGroup, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Program (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (j)(f) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. Long Term Incentive Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (k)(g) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. 2008-2010 Grant Acceptance Agreement - Company Performance Measures (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (l)(h) Form of PulteGroup, Inc. 2008-2010 Grant Acceptance Agreement - Individual Performance Measures (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 20, 2008)
     
  (m)(i) PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2013)
     
  (n)(j) PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of July 9, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009)
     
  (o)(k)Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014)
(l) Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)10(p) of our QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended MarchDecember 31, 2010)2013)
     
  (p)Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Filed herewith)
(q)Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees ( Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010)
(r)(m) Form of Stock Option Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 and 2004 Stock Incentive Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
     
  (s)(n) Form of Stock Option Agreement (as amended) under PulteGroup, Inc. 2002 and 2004 Stock Incentive Plans (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(t) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
     
  (t)(o) Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 )
     
  (u)Centex Corporation Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)
(v)Amended and Restated Centex Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)

96



(w)Form of stock option agreement for the Amended and Restated Centex Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2008)
(x)Centex Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2009)
(y)Form of stock option agreement for the Centex Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Centex’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2008)
(z)(p)  PulteGroup, Inc. Long Term Compensation Deferral Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006)
     
  (aa)(q)  PulteGroup, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (as Amended and Restated Effective December 8, 2009) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(al) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009)
     
  (ab)(r)  Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of August 18, 2009 between PulteGroup, Inc. and Centex Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 20, 2009)
     
  (ac)(s)  Form of Performance Award Agreement under PulteGroup, Inc. 2008 Senior Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012)
     


  (ad)(t) PulteGroup, Inc. Executive Severance Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2013)
     
  (ae)(u)  PulteGroup, Inc. Amended Retirement Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210(a) of our CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K, filed with10-Q for the SEC on February 12, 2013)quarter ended June 30, 2015)
     
  (af)(v) Master RepurchaseAmended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 28, 2012June 30, 2016 among ComericaPulteGroup, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and a Buyer,an L/C Issuer, and the other BuyersLenders party hereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as Sellerthereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ourPulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 2, 2012)July 1, 2016)
     
  (ag)(w) First Amendment toAmended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of September 13, 20134, 2015, among Comerica Bank, as Agent, Lead Arranger and a Buyer, the other Buyers party hereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as Seller (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 18, 2013)8, 2015)
     
  (ah)(x) Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of January 9, 2014 among Comerica Bank, as Agent and a Buyer, the other Buyers party hereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as SellerJune 24, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ourPulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 13, 2014)June 29, 2016)
     
  (ai)(y) Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated asAugust 15, 2016
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of September 13, 2013 among Comerica Bank, as Agent and a Buyer, PulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with
the other Buyers party hereto and Pulte Mortgage LLC, as Seller (filed herewith)SEC on August 17, 2016)
     
  (aj)(z) SeparationFourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of November 30, 2012, between PulteGroup, Inc. and John B. Bertero III (IncorporatedDecember 27, 2016
(Incorporated by referencedreference to Exhibit 10.1 of ourPulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with
the SEC on December 29, 2016)
(aa)Letter Agreement, dated July 20, 2016, by and between Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P.
and PulteGroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of PulteGroup, Inc.'s Form 10-Q, filed
with the SEC on July 21, 2016)
(ab)Letter Agreement by and among William J. Pulte (grandson of the founder), William J. Pulte (founder), William J. Pulte Trust dtd 01/26/90, Joan B. Pulte Trust dtd 01/26/90 and PulteGroup, Inc., dated September 8, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of PulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 4, 2012)September 8, 2016)
     
(ac)Transition Agreement by and between PulteGroup, Inc. and Richard J. Dugas, Jr., dated September 8, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of PulteGroup, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 8, 2016)
     
(12)   Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges at December 31, 20132016 (Filed herewith)
     
(21)   Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed herewith)
     
(23)   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith)
     
(24)Power of Attorney (filed herewith)
(31) (a) Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Richard J. Dugas, Jr., Chairman,Ryan R. Marshall, President and Chief Executive Officer (Filed herewith)
     
  (b) Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Robert T. O'Shaughnessy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)
     
(32)   Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Filed herewith)
     
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document

97



     
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
     
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
     
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
     
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
     
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

98




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PULTEGROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
 
February 5, 20141, 2017By:  /s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
   Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
   Executive Vice President
   and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capabilitiescapacities and on the datesdate indicated:
 
SignatureTitleDate
 February 1, 2017   
/s/ Richard J. Dugas, Jr.
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 5, 2014
Richard J. Dugas, Jr.
/s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 5, 2014
Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
/s/ James L. Ossowski
Vice President, Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 5, 2014
James L. Ossowski
/s/ Brian P. AndersonMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Brian P. Anderson
/s/ Bryce BlairMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Bryce Blair
/s/ Thomas J. FolliardMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Thomas J. Folliard
/s/ Cheryl W. GriséMember of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Cheryl W. Grisé   
     
/s/ André J. Hawaux Member of Board of Directors
/s/ Ryan R. Marshall February 5, 2014/s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy/s/ James L. Ossowski
André J. Hawaux
Ryan R. Marshall

Robert T. O'ShaughnessyJames L. Ossowski
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Vice President, Finance and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   
    
/s/ Debra J. Kelly-EnnisBrian P. Anderson Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Debra J. Kelly-Ennis}  
    
/s/ Patrick J. O’LearyBryce Blair Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
Patrick J. O’Leary}  
    
/s/ James J. PostlRichard W. Dreiling Member of Board of DirectorsFebruary 5, 2014
James J. Postl}  
    
Richard J. Dugas, Jr.Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors}/s/ Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
Thomas J. FolliardMember of Board of Directors}Robert T. O'Shaughnessy
Joshua GotbaumMember of Board of Directors}Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Cheryl W. GriséMember of Board of Directors}
André J. HawauxMember of Board of Directors}
Patrick J. O’LearyMember of Board of Directors}
John R. PeshkinMember of Board of Directors}
James J. PostlMember of Board of Directors}
Scott F. PowersMember of Board of Directors}
William J. PulteMember of Board of Directors}


9994