0000831259us-gaap:IntersegmentEliminationMemberfcx:MolybdenumMember2021-01-012021-12-31

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
OR
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission File Number: 001-11307-01
For the transition period from   to
Commission file number: 001-11307-01
fcx-20211231_g1.jpg
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.Delaware74-2480931
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware74-2480931
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
333 North Central Avenue
Phoenix ArizonaArizona85004-2189
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(602) 366-8100
(602) 366-8100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per shareFCXThe New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act  þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  þYes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.   
þ Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o Emerging growth company
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer  Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.                          ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).                             oYes þ No
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $22.4$48.6 billion on June 30, 2018.2021.
Common stock issued and outstanding was 1,449,058,8851,454,781,055 shares on January 31, 2019, and 1,448,998,940 shares on June 30, 2018.2022.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of ourthe registrant’s proxy statement for our 2019its 2022 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this report.


FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.



Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Item 6. Reserved





i

Table of Contents

PART I
Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties.


All of our periodic reports filed with the United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available, free of charge, through our website, www.fcx.com,“fcx.com,” including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports. These reports and amendments are available through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material to the SEC. Our website is for information only and the contents of our website are not incorporated in, or otherwise to be regarded as part of, this Form 10-K.


References to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “Notes” refer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein (refer to Item 8)8.), and references to “MD&A” refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included herein (refer to Item 7)Items 7. and 7A.).


GENERAL


We are a leading international mining company with headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. Our company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on November 10, 1987. We operate large, long-lived, geographically diverse assets with significant proven and probable mineral reserves of copper, gold and molybdenum, and wemolybdenum. We are one of the world’s largest publicly traded copper producer.producers. Our portfolio of assets includes the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia, one of the world’s largest copper and gold deposits; and significant mining operations in the Americas,North America and South America, including the large-scale Morenci minerals district in North AmericaArizona and the Cerro Verde operation in South America.Peru.


Our results for 2021 reflect strong operating and financial performance, and cash flow generation. We remained focused on cost and capital management and advanced our sustainability objectives. Despite continued challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we achieved a 19 percent increase in copper sales volumes and a 59 percent increase in gold sales volumes in 2021, compared with 2020. To date, our vigilant operating protocols have been effective in mitigating and preventing a major outbreak of COVID-19 at each of our operating sites. Protecting the health of our workforce and communities where we operate is a top priority, and we continue to focus on safeguarding our business in an uncertain public health and economic environment.

We believe that we have a high-quality portfolio of long-lived copper assets positioned to generate long-term value. We have commenced a project to develop the Lone Star oxide ores near the Safford operation in eastern Arizona, and PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI) has several projects inThe ramp-up of underground mining at the Grasberg minerals district relatedin Indonesia continues to advance on schedule, and in fourth-quarter 2021, we achieved quarterly copper and gold volumes approximating 100 percent of the developmentprojected annualized levels. Also, the Lone Star copper leach project at our Safford mine is exceeding the initial design capacity of its large-scale, long-lived, high-grade underground ore bodies. We are also pursuing other opportunities200 million pounds annually and produced approximately 235 million pounds of copper in 2021. During 2022, we plan to enhance our mines’ net present values, and we continue to advance studies for future development oforganic growth initiatives at our copper resources, the timing of which will be dependentoperating sites, based on a favorable operational and market conditions.outlook.


On December 21, 2018,During 2021, we completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rightsadopted and share ownership. We expect our share of future cash flows of the expanded PT-FI asset base, combined with the cash proceeds received in the transaction, to be comparable to our share of anticipated future cash flows under PT-FI’s former Contract of Work (COW) and joint venture arrangements with Rio Tinto plc (Rio Tinto Joint Venture).

Asimplemented a result of the transaction, PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium’s (Persero) (PT Inalum), an Indonesian state-owned enterprise, and PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral’s (PTI - formerly known as PT Indocopper Investama) collective share ownership of PT-FI totals 51.24 percent and our share ownership is 48.76 percent. The arrangements provide for us and the other pre-transaction PT-FI shareholders to retain the economics of the revenue and cost sharing arrangements under the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture. As a result, our economic interest in PT-FI, including our share of PT-FI's net income, is expected to approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022.performance-based payout framework. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the PT-FI divestment transaction.

We, PT-FI, PTI and PT Inalum also entered into a shareholders agreement at closing, which includes provisions related to the governance and management of PT-FI, and establishes our control over the management of PT-FI's operations. Concurrent with closing the transaction, the Indonesian government granted PT-FI a new special mining license (IUPK) to replace its former COW, enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend mining rights through 2041, subject to PT-FI completing the construction of a new smelter in Indonesia within five years of closing the transaction and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the Indonesian government. Refer to Note 13 and Item 1A. “Risk Factors”Factors,” Item 5. “Market for further discussionRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of PT-FI’s IUPK.

During the three years ended December 31, 2018, we have taken actions to restore our balance sheet strength through a combination of asset saleEquity Securities,” MD&A and capital market transactions, which primarily occurred during 2016. Refer to Notes 2 andNote 10 for further discussion of these transactions. These actions, combined with cash flow from operations, resulted in net reductions of debt totaling $9.3 billion during the three years ended December 31, 2018.discussion.

1


Following are our ownership interests at December 31, 2018,2021, in operating mines through our consolidated subsidiaries, Freeport Minerals Corporation (FMC) and PT-FI:PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI):
fcx-20211231_g2.jpg
a.Prior to December 21, 2018, we owned 90.64 percent of PT-FI and PT-FI had an unincorporated joint venture with Rio Tinto. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the PT-FI divestment transaction and Note 3 for discussion of the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture.
b.FMC has a 72 percent undivided interest in Morenci via an unincorporated joint venture. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.

a.Our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent through 2022 and 48.76 percent thereafter. Refer to Note 3 for discussion of the PT-FI divestment transaction.
b.FMC has a 72 percent undivided interest in Morenci via an unincorporated joint venture. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.

At December 31, 2018,2021, our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves totaled 119.6107.2 billion pounds of copper, 30.827.1 million ounces of gold and 3.783.39 billion pounds of molybdenum. Following is a summarythe allocation of our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves at December 31, 2018,2021, by geographic location (refer to “Mining Operations” and “Mineral Reserves” for further discussion):
CopperGoldMolybdenum
North America40 %%79 %a
South America30 — 21 
Indonesia30 98 — 
100 %100 %100 %
 Copper Gold Molybdenum  
North America42% 2% 81%
a 
 
South America28
 
 19
  
Indonesia30
 98
 
  
 100% 100% 100%  
a.Our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines contain 19 percent of our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable molybdenum reserves, and our North America copper mines contain 60 percent.
a.Our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines contain 20 percent of our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable molybdenum reserves, and our North America copper mines contain 61 percent.


In North America, we operate seven copper mines - Morenci, Bagdad, Safford (including Lone Star), Sierrita and Miami in Arizona, and Chino and Tyrone in New Mexico, and two molybdenum mines - Henderson and Climax in Colorado. In addition to copper, certain of our North America copper mines also produce molybdenum concentrate, gold and silver. In South America, we operate two copper mines - Cerro Verde in Peru and El Abra in Chile. In addition to copper, the Cerro Verde mine also produces molybdenum concentrate and silver. In Indonesia, PT-FI operates in the Grasberg minerals district. In addition to copper, the Grasberg minerals district also produces gold and silver.

2


Following is a summary of the geographic locationallocation of our consolidated copper, gold and molybdenum production for the year 20182021 by geographic location (refer to “Mining Operations” and MD&A for further information):
CopperGoldMolybdenum
North America38 %%76 %a
South America27 — 24 
Indonesia35 99 — 
100 %100 %100 %
 Copper Gold Molybdenum 
North America37% 1% 71%
a 
South America33
 
 29
 
Indonesia30
 99
 
 
 100% 100% 100% 
a.Our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines produced 37 percent of our consolidated molybdenum production, and our North America copper mines produced 34 percent.

a.Our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines produced 36 percent of our consolidated molybdenum production, and our North America copper mines produced 40 percent.

Copper production from three of our mines, the Morenci mine in North America, the Cerro Verde mine in Peru and the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia, together totaled 74 percent of our consolidated copper production in 2021.

The geographic locations of our operating mines are shown on the world map below.
fcx-20211231_g3.jpg


COPPER, GOLD AND MOLYBDENUM


Following is a brief discussion of our primary natural resources - copper, gold and molybdenum. For further discussion of historical and current market prices of these commodities, refer to MD&A and Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”&A.


Copper
Copper is an internationally traded commodity, and its prices are determined by the major metals exchanges - the London Metal Exchange (LME), New York MercantileCommodity Exchange (NYMEX)Inc. (COMEX) and Shanghai Futures Exchange. Prices on these exchanges generally reflect the worldwide balance of copper supply and demand, and can be volatile and cyclical. During 2018,2021, the LME copper settlement price averaged $2.96$4.23 per pound, ranging from a low of $2.64$3.52 per pound to a record high of $3.29$4.86 per pound, and was $2.71$4.40 per pound aton December 31, 2018.2021.


In general, demand for copper reflects the rate of underlying world economic growth, particularly in industrial production and construction. According to Wood Mackenzie, a widely followed independent metals market consultant, copper’s end-use markets (and their estimated shares of total consumption) are construction (30(29 percent), electrical applications (27 percent), consumer products (25 percent), electrical applications (24(22 percent), transportation (11 percent) and industrial machinery (10(11 percent). We believe copper will continue to be essential in these basic uses as well as contribute significantly to new technologies for clean energy, efficiencies, to advance communications and to enhance public health. Examples of areas we believe will require additional copper in the future include: (i) high efficiency motors, which consume up to 75 percent more copper than a standard motor; (ii) electric vehicles, which consume up to four
3

Table of Contents
times the amount of copper in terms of weight compared to vehicles of similar size with an internal combustion engine, and require copper-intensive charging station infrastructure to refuel; and (iii) renewable energy such as wind and solar, which consume four to five times the amount of copper compared to traditional fossil fuel generated power.


Gold
Gold is used for jewelry, coinage and bullion as well as various industrial and electronic applications. Gold can be readily sold on numerous markets throughout the world. Benchmark prices are generally based on London Bullion Market Association (London) quotations. During 2018,2021, the London PM gold price averaged $1,268$1,799 per ounce, ranging from a low of $1,178$1,684 per ounce to a high of $1,355$1,943 per ounce, and was $1,279$1,806 per ounce on December 28, 201830, 2021 (there was no London PM gold price quote on December 31, 2018)2021).


Molybdenum
Molybdenum is a key alloying element in steel and the raw material for several chemical-grade products used in catalysts, lubrication, smoke suppression, corrosion inhibition and pigmentation. Molybdenum, as a high-purity metal, is also used in electronics such as flat-panel displays and in super alloys used in aerospace. Reference prices for molybdenum are available in several publications, including Metals Week, CRU Report and Metal Bulletin. During 2018,2021, the weekly average price of molybdenum quoted by Metals Week averaged $11.93$15.92 per pound, ranging from a low of $10.67$10.09 per pound to a high of $12.97$20.01 per pound, and was $11.88$18.70 per pound aton December 31, 2018.2021.


PRODUCTS AND SALES


Our consolidated revenues for 20182021 primarily included sales of copper (75 percent)(80 percent), gold (17 percent)(11 percent) and molybdenum (6 percent)(6 percent). Copper concentrate sales to PT Smelting (PT-FI’s 25-percent-owned39.5-percent-owned copper smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia) totaled 1214 percent of our consolidated revenues for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20182021, 12 percent for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 2017,13 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is the only customer that accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2018.2021. Refer to Note 16 for a summary of our consolidated revenues and operating income (loss) by business segment and geographic area.


Copper Products
We are one of the world’s leading producers of copper concentrate, cathode and continuous cast copper rod. During 2018, 2021, 59 percent of our mined copper was sold in concentrate, 21 percent as cathode and 20 percent as rod from our North America operations. The copper ore from our mines is generally processed either by smelting and refining or by solution extraction and electrowinning (SX/EW) as described below.


Copper Concentrate. We produce copper concentrate at six of our mines in which mined ore is crushed and treated to produce a copper concentrate with copper content of approximately 20 to 30 percent. In North America, copper concentrate is produced at the Morenci, Bagdad, Sierrita and Chino mines, and a significant portion is shipped to our Miami smelter in Arizona for further processing. Copper concentrate is also produced at the Cerro Verde mine in Peru and the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia.


Copper Cathode. We produce copper cathode at our electrolytic refinery located in El Paso, Texas, and at nine of our mines. 


SX/EW cathode is produced from the Morenci, Bagdad, Safford, Sierrita, Miami, Chino and Tyrone mines in North America, and from the Cerro Verde and El Abra mines in South America. For ore subject to the SX/EW process, the ore is placed on stockpiles and copper is extracted from the ore by dissolving it with a weak sulphuricsulfuric acid solution. The copper content of the solution is increased in two additional SX stages, and then the copper-bearing solution undergoes an EW process to produce cathode that is, on average, 99.99 percent copper. Our copper cathode is used as the raw material input for copper rod, brass mill products and for other uses.


Copper cathode is also produced at Atlantic Copper (our wholly owned copper smelting and refining unit in Spain) and PT Smelting. Copper concentrate is smelted (i.e., subjected to extreme heat) to produce copper anode, which weighs between 800 and 900 pounds and has an average copper content of 99.5 percent. The anode is further treated by electrolytic refining to produce copper cathode, which weighs between 100 and 350 pounds and has an average copper content of 99.99 percent. Refer to “Mining Operations - Smelting Facilities and Other Mining Properties” for further discussion of Atlantic Copper and PT Smelting.

4

Table of Contents
Continuous Cast Copper Rod. We manufacture continuous cast copper rod at our facilities in El Paso, Texas; Norwich, Connecticut;Texas and Miami, Arizona, primarily using copper cathode produced at our North America copper mines.



Copper Sales
North America. The majority of the copper produced at our North America copper mines and refined in our El Paso, Texas refinery is consumed at our rod plants to produce copper rod which is sold to wire and cable manufacturers. The remainder of our North America copper production is sold in the form of copper cathode or copper concentrate under U.S. dollar-denominated annual contracts. Cathode and rod contract prices are generally based on the prevailing Commodity Exchange Inc. (COMEX - a division of NYMEX)COMEX monthly average settlement price for the month of shipment and include a premium. Generally, copper cathode is sold to rod, brass or tube fabricators. During 2018, 172021, 23 percent of our North America mines’ copper concentrate sales volumes were shipped to Atlantic Copper for smelting and refining and sold as copper anode and copper cathode.cathode by Atlantic Copper.


South America.Production from our South America mines is sold as copper concentrate or copper cathode under U.S. dollar-denominated, annual and multi-year contracts. During 2018,2021, our South America mines sold approximately 7775 percent of their copper production in concentrate and 2325 percent as cathode. During 2021,

5 percent of our South America mines’ copper concentrate sales volumes were shipped to Atlantic Copper for smelting and refining and sold as copper anode and copper cathode by Atlantic Copper.

Substantially all of our South America’sAmerica copper concentrate and cathode sales contracts provide final copper pricing in a specified future month (generally one to four months from the shipment date) primarily based on quoted LME monthly average settlement copper prices. Revenues from our South America’sAmerica concentrate sales are recorded net of royalties and treatment charges (i.e., fees paid to smelters that are generally negotiated annually). In addition, because a portion of the metals contained in copper concentrate is unrecoverable from the smelting process, revenues from our South America’sAmerica concentrate sales are also recorded net of allowances for unrecoverable metals, which are a negotiated term of the contracts and vary by customer.


Indonesia.PT-FI sells its production in the form of copper concentrate, which contains significant quantities of gold and silver, primarily under U.S. dollar-denominated, long-term contracts. PT-FI also sells a small amount of copper concentrate in the spot market. Following is a summary of PT-FI’s aggregate percentage of concentrate sales to unaffiliated third parties, PT Smelting and Atlantic Copper for the years ended December 31:
 202120202019
Third parties55 %48 %34 %
PT Smelting41 50 64 
Atlantic Copper
 100 %100 %100 %
 2018 2017 2016
Third parties60% 54% 56%
PT Smelting38
 46
 42
Atlantic Copper2
 
 2
 100% 100% 100%


Substantially all of PT-FI’s concentrate sales contracts provide final copper pricing in a specified future month (generally one to four months from the shipment date) primarily based on quoted LME monthly average settlement copper prices. Revenues from PT-FI’s concentrate sales are recorded net of royalties, export duties, treatment charges and allowances for unrecoverable metals.


Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of Indonesia regulations regarding PT-FI’s concentrate exports.

Gold Products and Sales
We produce gold almost exclusively from the Grasberg minerals district. GoldThe gold we produce is primarily sold as a component of our copper concentrate or in slimes, which are a product of the smelting and refining process at Atlantic Copper.process. Gold generally is priced at the average London price for a specified month near the month of shipment. Revenues from gold sold as a component of our copper concentrate are recorded net of treatment and refining charges, royalties, export duties and allowances for unrecoverable metals. Revenues from gold sold in slimes are recorded net of refining charges.


Molybdenum Products and Sales
We are the world’s largest producer of molybdenum and molybdenum-based chemicals. In addition to production from the Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines, we produce molybdenum concentrate at certain of the North America copper mines and the Cerro Verde copper mine in Peru. The majority of our molybdenum concentrate is processed in our own conversion facilities. Our molybdenum sales are primarily priced based on the average published Metals Week price for the month prior to the month of shipment.

5

Table of Contents

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS


LABOR MATTERS

At December 31, 2018, we employed approximately 26,800 people (12,200Our operations are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations imposed by governments and regulatory bodies, both in North America, 7,100 in Indonesia, 6,100 in South Americathe U.S. and 1,400 in Europe and other locations). We also had contractors that employ personnel at manyinternationally. These regulations touch all aspects of our operations, including approximately 23,400 at the Grasberghow we extract, process and explore for minerals district in Indonesia, 8,800 in North America, 5,900 atand how we conduct our South Americabusiness, including regulations governing matters such as environmental and reclamation matters, mining rights, climate change, occupational health and safety and human rights.

Environmental and Reclamation Matters

Our operations are subject to extensive and 700 in Europecomplex laws and other locations. Employees represented by unions at December 31, 2018, are listed below, with the number of employees represented and the expiration date of the applicable union agreements:

 LocationNumber of Unions
Number of
Union-
Represented Employees
Expiration Date
 
 PT-FI – Indonesia25,010
September 2019 
 Cerro Verde – Peru13,304
August 2021 
 El Abra – Chile2705
April 2020 
 Atlantic Copper – Spain3465
December 2019
a 
 Kokkola - Finland3418
November 2020 
 Rotterdam – The Netherlands152
September 2019 
 Kisanfu – Africa Exploration251
N/A
b 
 Stowmarket - United Kingdom142
May 2020 
a.The Collective Labor Agreement between Atlantic Copper and its workers’ unions expired in December 2015, but was extended through December 2019 by mutual agreement of both parties in accordance with Spanish law.
b.The Collective Labor Agreement between Kisanfu and its unions has no expiration date, but can be amended at any time in accordance with an established process.

Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further information on labor matters.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND RECLAMATION MATTERS

The cost of complying withregulations, including environmental laws and regulations governing the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances; solid waste disposal; air emissions; wastewater discharges; remediation, restoration and reclamation of environmental contamination, including mine closures and reclamation; protection of endangered and threatened species and designation of critical habitats; and other related matters. In addition, we must obtain regulatory permits and approvals to start, continue and expand operations. As a mining company, compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations is fundamental toan integral and a substantial costcostly part of our business. We conduct our operations in a manner that aims to protect public health and the environment, and we believe our operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects.
Laws such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) and similar state laws may expose us to joint and several liability for environmental damages caused by our operations, or by previous owners or operators of properties we acquired or are currently operating or at sites where we previously sent materials for processing, recycling or disposal. We have substantial obligations for environmental remediation on mining properties previously owned or operated by FMC and certain of its affiliates. At December 31, 2021, we had $1.7 billion recorded in our consolidated balance sheet for environmental obligations attributable to CERCLA or analogous state programs and for estimated future costs associated with environmental matters at closed facilities or closed portions of operating facilities.

We are required by U.S. federal and state laws and regulations to provide financial assurance sufficient to allow a third party to implement approved closure and reclamation plans for our mining properties if we are unable to do so. Most of our financial assurance obligations are imposed by state laws that vary significantly by jurisdiction, depending on how each state regulates land use and groundwater quality. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies may also require financial assurance for investigation and remediation actions that are required under settlements of enforcement actions under CERCLA or similar state laws.

Regulations have been considered at various governmental levels to increase financial responsibility requirements both for mine closure and reclamation. In 2019, legislation was enacted in Colorado that eliminates our ability to use parent company guarantees, and requires proof of an end date for water treatment as a condition of permit issuance authorizing mining operations, with some exceptions for existing operations. In 2018, EPA concluded a rulemaking that considered the need for financial responsibility for hardrock mining operations under CERCLA by publishing its determination that it did not intend to require financial responsibility for the hardrock mining industry sector. In 2019, the D.C. Circuit upheld the EPA’s decision. In connection with the Presidential Executive Order issued on January 20, 2021, EPA will review this final action, though the timing of its review is unknown.

Our mining operations are also subject to regulations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that are intended to protect species listed by the Department of Interior’s Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) as endangered or threatened, along with critical habitat designated by FWS for these listed species. The regulations limit the ability of landowners, including us, to obtain federal permits or authorizations needed for expansion of our operations, and may also affect our ability to obtain, retain or deliver water to some operations. On October 26, 2021, FWS published two proposed rules that rescind changes made in 2019 and 2020 to mitigate potential regulatory constraints on mining operations under the ESA.

New or revised environmental regulatory requirements are frequently proposed, many of which result in substantially increased costs for our business, including those regarding financial assurance above and in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” For example, our Miami, Arizona, smelter processes a significant portion of the copper concentrate produced by our North America copper mines. EPA is currently in the process of revising the standards for hazardous air pollutants from primary copper smelters, which could impose additional requirements on our operations. We may be required to modify our systems or install additional equipment to address findings, new
6

Table of Contents
requirements or for other reasons, which could result in significant costs, including increased capital expenditures and operating costs, and could adversely impact our business.

EPA and state agencies continue to consider regulations for man-made organic compounds that could be present in soil, groundwater and surface water at our existing and former operations. These regulations may include drinking water standards, hazardous waste requirements, and hazardous substance designations for Perfluorooctanesulfonic and Perfluorooctanoic acids. EPA is also considering how to reduce lead exposure in the environment under multiple environmental programs. Certain federal and state health agencies also support more stringent lead cleanup levels. The timing for these EPA activities is unclear, but reduction in lead cleanup levels could result in material increases to our environmental reserves for ongoing residential property cleanup projects near former smelter sites.

EPA and the Department of the Army (together, the Agencies) continue to consider whether and how to regulate remote “tributaries” under the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” that are protected by the Clean Water Act. These requirements can impose significant additional restrictions on land uses in remote areas with only tenuous connections to active waterways. Regulations adopted by the Agencies in 2015, 2019 and 2020 governing “waters of the United States” have been challenged by multiple states and industry parties and litigation on all three final rules is ongoing. Most recently, a federal district court in Arizona vacated and remanded the regulations that became effective in 2020, and the Agencies subsequently published a proposed rule on December 7, 2021, that announced they will revert back to regulations in place prior to 2015. These rules define whether we need federal authorization under the Clean Water Act to expand our operations.

We incurred environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs (including our joint venture partners’ shares) to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations that affect our operations totaling $0.3 billion in both 2021 and 2020 and $0.4 billion in 2019. For 2022, we expect to incur approximately $0.5 billion of aggregate environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs. The timing and amounts of estimated payments could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, changes in scope and costs of reclamation activities, the settlement of environmental matters and the rate at which actual spending occurs on continuing matters.

For information about environmental regulation, litigation and related costs, refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Notes 1 and 12.12.


Mining Rights

We conduct our mining and exploration activities pursuant to concessions granted by, or under contracts with, the host government in the countries where we operate. These countries include, among others, the U.S., Peru, Chile and Indonesia. Mining rights include our license to operate and involve our payment of applicable taxes and royalties to the host governments. The concessions and contracts are subject to the political risks associated with the host countries. For information about mining rights, including laws and regulations applicable to PT-FI, governmental agreements and licenses to operate, refer to “Mining Operations” below, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Notes 3, 11, 12 and 13.

Climate Change

In many of the jurisdictions in which we operate, governmental bodies are increasingly enacting legislation and regulations in response to the potential impacts of climate change. For example, as a result of the 2015 Paris Agreement, a number of governments have pledged “Nationally Determined Contributions” to control and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including the U.S. Additionally, the recent pledges made as part of the 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact could result in further policy changes in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Further, several states in the U.S., including Colorado and New Mexico, have advanced goals reducing or eliminating fossil fuel-based energy production. Carbon tax legislation also has been adopted in jurisdictions where we operate, including Indonesia, and we expect that such carbon taxes and other carbon pricing mechanisms will increase over time. We anticipate that we will dedicate more resources and money to comply and remediate in response to legislative or regulatory changes, and our ability to modify our operations to avoid these costs may be limited in the near term. However, it is not yet possible to reasonably estimate the nature, extent, timing and cost or other impacts of any future carbon pricing mechanisms, other climate change regulatory programs or future legislative action that may be enacted.

7

Table of Contents
For information about the potential impacts of climate change and related regulations, refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Health and Safety

The safety and health of our workforce is our highest priority. Management believes that safety and health considerations are integral to, and compatible with, all other functions in the organization and that proper safety and health management will enhance production and reduce costs. We are subject to extensive regulation of worker health and safety, including the requirements of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and similar laws of other jurisdictions. In the U.S., the operation of our mines is subject to regulation by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Additionally, in the U.S. various state agencies have concurrent jurisdiction arising under state law that regulate worker health and safety in both our industrial facilities and mines. If regulatory inspections result in an alleged violation, we may be subject to fines and penalties and, in instances of alleged significant violations, our mining operations or industrial facilities could be subject to temporary or extended closures. Refer to Exhibit 95.1 to this Form 10-K for additional information regarding certain orders and citations issued by MSHA for our operations during the year ended December 31, 2021. For information about health and safety, refer to “Human Capital” below and Item 4. “Mine Safety Disclosures.”

Human Rights

We have adopted policies that govern our working relationships with the communities and governments where we operate and that are designed to guide our practices and programs in a manner that respects human rights and the culture of the local people impacted by our operations. For information about human rights, refer to “Community and Human Rights” below.

COMPETITION


The top 10 producers of copper comprise approximately 4543 percent of total worldwide mined copper production. We currently rankFor the year 2021, we ranked second among those producers, with approximately seven percent of estimated total worldwide mined copper production. Our competitive position is based on the size, quality and grade of our ore bodies and our ability to manage costs compared with other producers. We have a diverse portfolio of mining operations with varying ore grades and cost structures. Our costs are driven by the location, grade and nature of our ore bodies, and the level of input costs, including energy, labor and equipment. The metals markets are cyclical, and our ability to maintain our competitive position over the long term is based on our ability to acquire and develop quality deposits, hire and retain a skilled workforce, and to manage our costs.



MINING OPERATIONS


The Copper Mark
We are committed to validating all of our copper producing sites, including our mines and smelting and refining facilities, with the Copper Mark, a comprehensive assurance framework designed to demonstrate the copper industry’s responsible production practices. To achieve the Copper Mark, each site is required to complete an external assurance process to assess conformance with 32 environmental, social and governance requirements. As of December 31, 2021, we had a total of seven sites that had been validated (Bagdad, Morenci, Miami, El Paso, Cerro Verde, El Abra and Atlantic Copper), and we have commenced the Copper Mark assessment process at four additional sites in North America (Chino, Tyrone, Safford and Sierrita).

Tailings Management
Our tailings management and stewardship program, which involves qualified external Engineers of Record and periodic oversight by independent tailings Technical Review Boards and our Tailings Stewardship Team, complies with the tailings governance framework on preventing catastrophic failure of tailings storage facilities adopted in December 2016 by the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), an industry group of which we are a founding member, and required to be implemented by ICMM members. In August 2020, the co-conveners of the Global Tailings Review, which included ICMM, published the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (the Tailings Standard). The Tailings Standard includes 77 requirements across 6 key areas including the design, construction, operation and monitoring of tailings facilities, management and governance, emergency response and long-term recovery, and public disclosure. As a member of ICMM, we are committed to implementation of the
8

Table of Contents
Tailings Standard by August 2023 for priority tailings storage facilities and by August 2025 for our remaining facilities, in line with the Tailings Standard requirements/commitments.

Overview of Mines
Following are maps and descriptions of our mining operations in North America (including both copper and molybdenum operations), South America and Indonesia. We consider our material mines, as defined under the disclosure requirements of Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (S-K 1300), to be the Morenci mine in North America, the Cerro Verde mine in Peru and the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia. Refer to Exhibits 96.1, 96.2 and 96.3 for the Technical Report Summaries that have been prepared for our material mines in support of the disclosure and filing requirements of the SEC under S-K 1300.


North America
In the U.S., most of the land occupied by our copper and molybdenum mines, concentrators, SX/EW facilities, smelter, refinery, rod mills, molybdenum roasters and processing facilities is owned by us or is located on unpatented mining claims owned by us. Certain portions of our Bagdad, Sierrita, Miami, Chino, Tyrone, Henderson and Climax operations are located on government-owned land and are operated under a Mine Plan of Operations or other use permit. We hold various federal and state permits or leases on government land for purposes incidental to mine operations.

Morenci
fcx-20211231_g4.jpg


We own a 72 percent undivided interest in Morenci, with the remaining 28 percent owned by Sumitomo Metal Mining Arizona, Inc. (15 percent) and SMM Morenci, Inc. (13 percent). Each partner takes in kind its share of Morenci’s production.


Morenci is an open-pit copper mining complex that has been in continuous operation since 1939 and previously was mined through underground workings. In the 1880s, Phelps Dodge & Company (Phelps Dodge) first invested in the
area, and through acquisition, consolidated all mining operations in the area by the 1920s. Phelps Dodge was acquired by FCX in 2007. Morenci is located in Greenlee County, Arizona, approximately 50 miles northeast of Safford on U.S. Highway 191. The property is located at latitude 33.07 degrees north and longitude 109.35 degrees
west using the World Geodetic System (WGS) 84 coordinate system. The site is accessible by a paved highway and a railway spur.


The Morenci mine is a porphyry copper deposit that has oxide, secondary sulfide and primary sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper mineral is chrysocolla. Chalcocite is the most important secondary copper sulfide mineral, with chalcopyrite as the dominant primary copper sulfide.


The Morenci operation consists of two concentrators capablewith a milling design capacity of milling 115,000132,000 metric tons of ore per day, which produce copper and molybdenum concentrate; a 68,00072,500 metric ton-per-day, crushed-ore leach pad and stacking system; a low-grade run-of-mine (ROM) leaching system; four SX plants; and three EW tank houses that produce copper cathode. Total EW tank house capacity is approximately 900 million pounds of copper per year. Morenci’s available mining fleet consists of one hundred and twenty-six 236-metric tonfifty-four 236-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by 13 electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 47 to 57 cubic meters, which aremeters. Morenci’s mining fleet is capable of moving an average of 815,000 metric tons of material per day. One of Morenci’s concentrators, which has a milling capacity of approximately 50,000 metric tons of ore per day was restarted in July 2021 after being on care and maintenance

9

Table of Contents
status and is expected to resume operating at full capacity in early 2022. Our share of Morenci's net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $1.9 billion.

Morenci’s production, including our joint venture partner’spartners’ share, totaled 0.9 billion pounds of copper and 5 million pounds of molybdenum in 2021, 1.0 billion pounds of copper and 96 million pounds of molybdenum in 2018,2020, and 1.0 billion pounds of copper and 125 million pounds of molybdenum in 2017, and 1.1 billion pounds of copper and 15 million pounds of molybdenum in 2016.2019.


Morenci is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 13 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 2,0001,900 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to have an elevation of 840780 meters above sea level. The Morenci operation encompasses approximately 73,95061,700 acres, comprising 51,15051,300 acres of patented mining claims and other fee lands 20,050and 10,400 acres of unpatented mining claims held on public landmineral estate and 2,750 acres of land held bynumerous state or federal permits, easements and rights-of-way.



The Morenci operation’s electrical power is primarily sourced from Tucsonsupplied by our wholly owned subsidiary, Morenci Water and Electric Power Company Arizona Public Service Company and(MW&E). MW&E sources its generation services through our wholly owned subsidiary, Freeport-McMoRan Energy Services, through capacity rights at the Luna Energy facilityFacility in Deming, New Mexico.Mexico, and other power purchase agreements. Although we believe the Morenci operation has sufficient water sources to support current operations, we are a party to litigation that may impact our water right claims or rights to continued use of currently available water supplies, which could adversely affect our water supply for the Morenci operation. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” for further discussion.

Bagdad
fcx-20211231_g5.jpg


Our wholly owned Bagdad mine is an open-pit copper and molybdenum mining complex located in Yavapai County in west-central Arizona. It is approximately 60 miles west of Prescott and 100 miles northwest of Phoenix. The property can be reached by U.S. Highway 93 to State Route 97 or Arizona Highway 96, which ends at the town of Bagdad. The closest railroad is at Hillside, Arizona, 24 miles southeast on Arizona Highway 96. The open-pit mining operation has been ongoing since 1945, and prior mining was conducted through underground workings.


The Bagdad mine is a porphyry copper deposit containing both sulfide and oxide mineralization. Chalcopyrite and molybdenite are the dominant primary sulfides and are the primary economic minerals in the mine. Chalcocite is the most common secondary copper sulfide mineral, and the predominant oxide copper minerals are chrysocolla, malachite and azurite.


The Bagdad operation consists of a 75,000concentrator with a milling design capacity of 77,100 metric ton-per-day concentratortons of ore per day that produces copper and molybdenum concentrate, ana SX/EW plant that can produce up to 32approximately 6 million pounds per year of copper cathode from solution generated by low-grade stockpile leaching, and a pressure-leach plant to process molybdenum concentrate. The available mining fleet consists of thirty 235-metric tonthirty-two 235-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by fiveeight electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 30 to 48 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 250,000236,000 metric tons of material per day. Bagdad’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $618 million. We are evaluating an expansion to potentially double concentrate capacity at our Bagdad operation.


10

Table of Contents
Bagdad’s production totaled 199184 million pounds of copper and 10 million pounds of molybdenum in 2018, 173 million pounds of copper and 9 million pounds of molybdenum in 2017, and 1772021, 216 million pounds of copper and 811 million pounds of molybdenum in 2016.2020, and 218 million pounds of copper and 13 million pounds of molybdenum in 2019.


Bagdad is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 15 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 1,200 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to be 310150 meters above sea level. The Bagdad operation encompasses approximately 21,75051,200 acres, comprising 21,15040,000 acres of patented mining claims and other fee lands and 60011,200 acres of unpatented mining claims.claims held on public mineral estate and numerous state or federal permits, easements and rights-of-ways.


Bagdad receives electrical power from Arizona Public Service Company. We believe the Bagdad operation has sufficient water sources to support current operations.



Safford, including Lone Star
fcx-20211231_g4.jpg


Our wholly owned Safford mine has been in operation since 2007 and is an open-pit copper mining complex located in Graham County, Arizona, 8 miles north of the town of Safford and 170 miles east of Phoenix. The site is accessible by paved county road off U.S. Highway 70.


The Safford mine includes twothree copper deposits that have oxide mineralization overlaying primary copper sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper minerals are chrysocolla and copper-bearing iron oxides with the predominant copper sulfide material being chalcopyrite. The only Safford deposit currently being mined is the Lone Star copper leach project, which began operations in the second half of 2020 and produced approximately 235 million pounds of copper in 2021. We continue to advance opportunities to increase Lone Star operating rates and are advancing plans to increase volumes to achieve 300 million pounds of copper per year from oxide ores. The oxide project advances the opportunity for development of the large-scale sulfide resources at Lone Star. We are increasing exploration in the area to support metallurgical testing and mine development planning for a potential long-term investment in a concentrator.


The propertySafford is a mine-for-leach project andoperation that produces copper cathode. The operation consists of twothree open pits, of which one (Lone Star) is currently being mined, feeding a crushing facility with a design capacity of 103,000103,500 metric tons of ore per day. The crushed ore is delivered to a leach padspad by a series of overland and portable conveyors. Leach solutions feed a SX/EW facility with a capacity of 240305 million pounds of copper per year. A sulfur burner plant is also in operation at Safford, providing a cost-effective source of sulphuricsulfuric acid used in SX/EW operations. The available mining fleet consists of thirty-three 235-metric tonforty-two 235-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by six electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 34 to 47 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 340,000358,000 metric tons of material per day. Safford’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $1.2 billion.


Safford’s copper production totaled 123265 million pounds in 2018, 1502021, 161 million pounds in 20172020 and 230110 million pounds in 2016.2019.

Through exploration drilling, we have identified a significant resource at our wholly owned Lone Star project located near the Safford operation. An initial project to develop the Lone Star oxide ores commenced in first-quarter 2018, with first production expected by the end of 2020. Initial production from the Lone Star oxide ores is expected to average approximately 200 million pounds of copper per year. Total capital costs, including mine equipment and pre-production stripping, are expected to approximate $850 million and will benefit from the utilization of existing infrastructure at the adjacent Safford operation. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $290 million has been incurred for this project. The project also advances exposure to a significant sulfide resource. We expect to incorporate recent positive drilling and ongoing results in our future development plans.


Safford is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 10 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 1,7681,783 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to have an elevation of 808823 meters above sea level. The Safford operation encompasses approximately 125,00078,300 acres, comprising 36,00037,700 acres of patentedfee lands 73,000and 40,600 acres of unpatented lands and 16,000 acresclaims held on public mineral estate.
11

Table of land held by federal permit.Contents

The Safford operation’s electrical power is primarily sourced from Tucson Electric Power Company, Arizona Public Service Company and the Luna Energy facility. Although we believe the Safford operation has sufficient water sources to support current operations, as well as the Lone Star project, we are a party to litigation that may impact our water right claims or rights to continued use of currently available water supplies, which could adversely affect our water supply for the Safford operation. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” for further discussion.



Sierrita
fcx-20211231_g6.jpg


Our wholly owned Sierrita mine has been in operation since 1959 and is an open-pit copper and molybdenum mining complex located in Pima County, Arizona, approximately 20 miles southwest of Tucson and 7 miles west of the town of Green Valley and Interstate Highway 19. The site is accessible by a paved highway and by rail.


The Sierrita mine is a porphyry copper deposit that has oxide, secondary sulfide and primary sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper minerals are malachite, azurite and chrysocolla. Chalcocite is the most important secondary copper sulfide mineral, and chalcopyrite and molybdenite are the dominant primary sulfides.


The Sierrita operation includes a concentrator with a milling design capacity of 100,000 metric ton-per-day concentratortons of ore per day that produces copper and molybdenum concentrate. Sierrita also produces copper from a ROM oxide-leaching system. Cathode copper is plated at the Twin Buttes EW facility, which has a design capacity of approximately 50 million pounds of copper per year. The Sierrita operation also has molybdenum facilities consisting of a leaching circuit, two molybdenum roasters and a packaging facility. The molybdenum facilities process molybdenum concentrate produced by Sierrita, from our other mines and from third-party sources. The available mining fleet consists of twenty-two 235-metric tontwenty-four 235-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by three electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 34 to 56 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 175,000 metric tons of material per day. Sierrita’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $722 million.


Sierrita’s production totaled 152189 million pounds of copper and 1621 million pounds of molybdenum in 2018, 1602021, 178 million pounds of copper and 1517 million pounds of molybdenum in 2017,2020, and 162160 million pounds of copper and 1416 million pounds of molybdenum in 2016.2019.


Sierrita is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 1214.5 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 1,1601,300 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to be 440410 meters above sea level. The Sierrita operation, including the adjacent Twin Buttes site, (refer to “Smelting Facilities and Other Mining Properties” for further discussion), encompasses approximately 37,65047,600 acres, comprising 13,30038,700 acres of patentedfee lands including split estate lands and 8,900 acres of unpatented mining claims and 24,350 acres of split-estate lands.held on public mineral estate.


Sierrita receives electrical power through long-term contracts with the Tucson Electric Power Company. Although we believe the Sierrita operation has sufficient water sources to support current operations, we are a party to litigation that may impact our water rights claims or rights to continued use of currently available water supplies, which could adversely affect our water supply for the Sierrita operation. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” for further discussion.



12

Table of Contents
Miami
fcx-20211231_g7.jpg


Our wholly owned Miami mine is an open-pit copper mining complex located in Gila County, Arizona, 90 miles east of Phoenix and 6 miles west of the city of Globe on U.S. Highway 60. The site is accessible by a paved highway and by rail.


The Miami mine is a porphyry copper deposit that has leachable oxide and secondary sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper minerals are chrysocolla, copper-bearing clays, malachite and azurite. Chalcocite and covellite are the most important secondary copper sulfide minerals.


Since about 1915, the Miami mining operation had processed copper ore using both flotation and leaching technologies. The design capacity of the SX/EW plant is 200 million pounds of copper per year. Miami is no longer mining ore, but currently produces copper through leaching material already placed on stockpiles, which is currently expected to continue until 2023. through at least 2025. Miami’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs
at December 31, 2021, totaled $4 million.

Miami’s copper production totaled 1612 million pounds in 2018, 192021, 17 million pounds in 20172020 and 2515 million pounds in 2016.2019.


Miami is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 18 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 1,390 meters above sea level and mining advanced the pit bottom to an elevation of 810 meters above sea level. Subsequent sloughing of material into the pit has filled it back to an elevation estimated to be 900 meters above sea level. The Miami operation encompasses approximately 9,10014,700 acres, comprising 8,75010,400 acres of patented mining claims and other fee lands and 3504,300 acres of unpatented mining claims.claims held on public mineral estate.


Miami receives electrical power through long-term contracts with the Salt River Project and natural gas through long-term contracts with El Paso Natural Gas as the transporter. We believe the Miami operation has sufficient water sources to support current operations. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.


13

Table of Contents
Chino and Tyrone
fcx-20211231_g8.jpg


Chino
Our wholly owned Chino mine, which has been in operation since 1910, is an open-pit copper mining complex located in Grant County, New Mexico, approximately 15 miles east of the town of Silver City off of State Highway 180. The mine is accessible by paved roads and by rail. Chino has been in operation since 1910.


The Chino mine is a porphyry copper deposit with adjacent copper skarn deposits. There is leachable oxide, secondary sulfide and millable primary sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper mineral is chrysocolla. Chalcocite is the most important secondary copper sulfide mineral, and chalcopyrite and molybdenite the dominant primary sulfides.


The Chino operation consists of a concentrator with a milling design capacity of 36,000 metric ton-per-day concentratortons of ore per day that produces copper and molybdenum concentrate, and a 150 million pound-per-year SX/EW plant that produces copper cathode from solution generated by ROM leaching. The available mining fleet consists of thirty-seven 240-metric tontwenty-five 240-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by fourthree electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 31 to 48 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 235,000180,000 metric tons of material per day. Chino’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $491 million.


In April 2020, operations at Chino were suspended in connection with our revised operating plans in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. During first-quarter 2021, we restarted mining activities at the Chino mine at a reduced rate of approximately 100 million pounds of copper per year (approximately 50 percent capacity). Chino’s copper production totaled 173124 million pounds in 2018,2152021,92 million pounds in 20172020 and 308175 million pounds in 2016.2019.


Chino is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 16 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 2,250 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to be 1,4601,508 meters above sea level. The Chino operation encompasses approximately 118,600122,800 acres, comprising 113,200109,000 acres of patented mining claims and other fee lands and 5,40013,800 acres of unpatented mining claims.claims held on public mineral estate.


Chino receives electrical power from the Luna Energy facility and from the open market. We believe the Chino operation has sufficient water resources to support current operations. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with recently proposed legislation in New Mexico related to water quality standards.further discussion.


Tyrone
Our wholly owned Tyrone mine is an open-pit copper mining complex whichand has been in operation since 1967. It is located in Grant County, New Mexico, 10 miles south of Silver City, New Mexico, along State Highway 90. The site is accessible by paved road and by rail.


The Tyrone mine is a porphyry copper deposit. Mineralization is predominantly secondary sulfide consisting of chalcocite, with leachable oxide mineralization consisting of chrysocolla.


Copper processing facilities consist of a SX/EW operation with a maximum capacity of approximately 100 million pounds of copper cathode per year. The available mining fleet consists of seven 240-metric tonnine 240-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by one electric shovel with a bucket size of 47 cubic meters, which is capable of moving an average of 49,000108,000 metric tons of material per day. Tyrone’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $90 million.

14

Table of Contents
Tyrone’s copper production totaled 55 million pounds in 2018, 612021, 45 million pounds in 20172020 and 7648 million pounds in 2016.2019.


Tyrone is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 16 inches per year. The highest bench elevation is 2,0002,070 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to have an elevation of 1,475 meters above sea level. The Tyrone operation encompasses approximately 35,20080,700 acres, comprising 18,75067,700 acres of patented mining claims and other fee lands and 16,45013,000 acres of unpatented mining claims.claims held on public mineral estate.


Tyrone receives electrical power from the Luna Energy facility and from the open market. We believe the Tyrone operation has sufficient water resources to support current operations. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with recently proposed legislation in New Mexico related to water quality standards.further discussion.



Henderson and Climax
fcx-20211231_g9.jpg


Henderson
Our wholly owned Henderson molybdenum mine has been in operation since 1976 and is located 42 miles west of Denver, Colorado, off U.S. Highway 40. Nearby communities include the towns of Empire, Georgetown and Idaho Springs. The Henderson mill site is located 15 miles west of the mine and is accessible from Colorado State Highway 9. The Henderson mine and mill are connected by a 10-mile conveyor tunnel under the Continental Divide and an additional five-mile surface conveyor. The tunnel portal is located five miles east of the mill.


The Henderson mine is a porphyry molybdenum deposit, with molybdenite as the primary sulfide mineral.


The Henderson operation consists of a large block-cave underground mining complex feeding a concentrator with a currentdesign capacity of approximately 32,000 metric tons per day. Henderson has the capacity to produce approximately 1815 million pounds of molybdenum per year. The majority of the molybdenum concentrate produced is shipped to our Fort Madison, Iowa, processing facility. The available underground mining equipment fleet consists of fourteen 9-metric tonfifteen 9-metric-ton load-haul-dump (LHD) units and seven 73-metric ton73-metric-ton haul trucks, which deliver ore to a gyratory crusher feeding a series of three overland conveyors to the mill stockpiles. Henderson’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $265 million.


Henderson’s molybdenum production totaled 14 million pounds in 2018, 12 million pounds in 2017 and2021, 10 million pounds in 2016.2020 and 12 million pounds in 2019.


The Henderson mine is located in a mountainous region with the main access shaft at 3,180 meters above sea level. The main production levels are currently at elevations of 2,200 and 2,350 meters above sea level. This region experiences significant snowfall during the winter months.


The Henderson mine and mill operations encompass approximately 11,90017,200 acres, comprising 11,85013,000 acres of patentedfee lands, 4,200 acres of unpatented mining claims and other fee landsheld on public mineral estate and a 50-acre easement with the U.S. Forest Service for the surface portion of the conveyor corridor.


Henderson operations receive electrical power through long-term contracts with Xcel Energy and natural gas through long-term contracts with BPEncore Energy Company (with Xcel Energy as the transporter). We believe the Henderson operation has sufficient water resources to support current operations. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussionfurther discussion.
15

Table of risks associated with recently proposed legislation in Colorado related to water quality standards.Contents

Climax
Our wholly owned Climax mine is located 13 miles northeast of Leadville, Colorado, off Colorado State Highway 91 at the top of Fremont Pass. The mine is accessible by paved roads.roads. The mine was placed on care and maintenance status by its previous owner in 1995 and, after being acquired by us, began commercial production in 2012.


The Climax ore body is a porphyry molybdenum deposit, with molybdenite as the primary sulfide mineral.


The Climax open-pit mine includes a 25,000 metric ton-per-daytons of ore per day mill facility. Climax has the capacity to produce approximately 30 million pounds of molybdenum per year. The available mining fleet consists of ten 177-metric toneleven 177-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by two hydraulic shovels with bucket sizes of 34 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 90,000 metric tons of material per day. Climax’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $1.2 billion.


In April 2020, because of the decline in market prices of molybdenum, we revised our near-term operating plans, which included a reduction in production of molybdenum by approximately 50 percent at Climax. During the third quarter of 2021, Climax returned to pre-April 2020 production levels. We may increase operating rates at the Climax mine if necessary to satisfy increasing market demand for molybdenum. Molybdenum production from Climax totaled 2118 million pounds in 2018, 202021, 14 million pounds in 20172020 and 1617 million pounds in 2016.2019.


The Climax mine is located in a mountainous region. The highest bench elevation is approximately 4,050 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to have an elevation of approximately 3,100 meters above sea level. This region experiences significant snowfall during the winter months.


The operations encompassClimax operation encompasses approximately 14,35015,100 acres, consisting primarilycomprising 14,300 of patented mining claimsprivately owned land and other fee lands.800 acres of federal claims.


Climax operations receive electrical power through long-term contracts with Xcel Energy and natural gas through long-term contracts with Anadarko Energy and BP Energy Company (with Xcel Energy as the transporter).Encore Energy. We believe the Climax operation has sufficient water resources to support current operations. Refer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with recently proposed legislation in Colorado related to water quality standards.further discussion.


South America
At our operations in South America, mine properties and facilities are controlled through mining claims or concessions under the general mining laws of the relevant country. The claims or concessions are owned or controlled by the operating companies in which we or our subsidiaries have a controlling ownership interest. Roads, power lines and aqueducts are controlled by easements.


Cerro Verde
fcx-20211231_g10.jpg


We have a 53.56 percent ownership interest in Cerro Verde, with the remaining 46.44 percent held by SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V. (21.0 percent), Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (19.58 percent) and other stockholders whose shares are publicly traded on the Lima Stock Exchange (5.86 percent).


Cerro Verde is an open-pit copper and molybdenum mining complex that has been in operation since 1976 and is located 20 miles southwest of Arequipa, Peru. Prior to being acquired in 1994 by a predecessor of Phelps Dodge, the mine was previously operated by the Peru government. The property is located at latitude 16.53 degrees south
16

and longitude 71.58 degrees west using the WGS 84 coordinate system. The site is accessible by paved highway. Cerro Verde’s copper cathode and concentrate production that is not sold locally is transported approximately 70 miles by truck and by rail to the Port of Matarani for shipment to international markets. Molybdenum concentrate is transported by truck to either the Ports of Callao or Matarani for shipment.


The Cerro Verde mine is a porphyry copper deposit that has oxide, secondary sulfide and primary sulfide mineralization. The predominant oxide copper minerals are brochantite, chrysocolla, malachite and copper “pitch.” Chalcocite and covellite are the most important secondary copper sulfide minerals. Chalcopyrite and molybdenite are the dominant primary sulfides.

Cerro Verde’s operations benefit from its large-scale, long-lived reserves and cost efficiencies. During 2018, Cerro Verde received a modified environmental permit allowing it to operate its existing concentrator facilities at rates up to 409,500 metric tons of ore per day.


Cerro Verde’s operation consists of an open-pit copper mine,two concentrating facilities with a 409,500total milling design capacity of 360,000 metric ton-per-day concentrator,tons of ore per day and SX/EW leaching facilities. Leach copper production is derived from a 39,000 metric ton-per-day39,000-metric-ton-per-day crushed leach facility and a 100,000 metric ton-per-day100,000-metric-ton-per-day ROM leach system. This SX/EW leaching operation has a capacity of approximately 200 million pounds of copper per year.


The available fleet consists of thirty-four 290-metric tonfifty-four 300-metric-ton haul trucks and ninety-three 230-metric ton245-metric-ton haul trucks (21 of which are currently on standby) and three 363-metric-ton leased haul trucks loaded by twelvethirteen electric shovels with bucket sizes ranging in size from 33 to 57 cubic meters and two hydraulic

shovels with a bucket size of 21 cubic meters.meters (both of which are currently on standby). This fleet is capable of moving an average of approximately 975,000970,000 metric tons of material per day. Cerro Verde’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $6.1 billion.


During 2021, milling rates at Cerro Verde’s concentrator facilities averaged 380,300 metric tons of ore per day. Subject to ongoing monitoring of COVID-19 protocols, Cerro Verde is targeting milling rates to increase to approximately 400,000 metric tons of ore per day in 2022.

Cerro Verde’s production totaled 1.0 billion pounds of copper and 28 million pounds of molybdenum in 2018, 1.1 billion pounds of copper and 27 million pounds of molybdenum in 2017, and 1.10.9 billion pounds of copper and 21 million pounds of molybdenum in 2016.2021, 0.8 billion pounds of copper and 19 million pounds of molybdenum in 2020, and 1.0 billion pounds of copper and 29 million pounds of molybdenum in 2019.


Cerro Verde is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging 1.5 inches per year and is in an active seismic zone. The highest bench elevation is 2,7502,810 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to be 1,5531,523 meters above sea level. The PeruvianPeru general mining law and Cerro Verde’s mining stability agreement grant the surface rights of mining concessions located on government land. Additional governmentGovernment land if obtained after 1997 must be leased or purchased. Cerro Verde has a mining concession covering approximately 182,000178,000 acres, including 62,000 acres of surface rights and access to 14,600 acres granted through an easement from the Regional Government of Arequipa,Peru National Assets Office, plus 144150 acres of owned property, and 3671,151 acres of rights-of-way outside the mining concession area.area leased from both government agencies and private parties.


Cerro Verde currently receives electrical power, including hydro-generated power, under long-term contracts with Kallpa Generación SA, ElectroPeru and Engie Energia Peru S.A.


Water for our Cerro Verde processing operations comes from renewable sources through a series of storage reservoirs on the Rio Chili watershed that collect water primarily from seasonal precipitation.precipitation and from wastewater collected from the city of Arequipa and treated at a wastewater treatment plant. We believe the Cerro Verde operation has sufficient water resources to support current operations. For further discussion of risks associated with the availability of water, seeRefer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”Factors” for further discussion.



17

El Abra
fcx-20211231_g11.jpg


We ownhave a 51 percent ownership interest in El Abra, and the remaining 49 percent interest is held by the state-owned copper enterprise Corporación Nacional del Cobre de Chile (CODELCO).Chile.


El Abra is an open-pit copper mining complex that has been in operation since 1996 and is located 47 miles north of Calama in Chile’s El Loa province, Region II. The site is accessible by paved highway and by rail.


The El Abra mine is a porphyry copper deposit that has sulfide and oxide mineralization. The predominant primary sulfide copper minerals are bornite and chalcopyrite. There is a minor amount of secondary sulfide mineralization
as chalcocite. The oxide copper minerals are chrysocolla and pseudomalachite. There are lesser amounts of copper-bearingcopper bearing clays and tenorite.


The El Abra operation consists of an open-pit copper mine and a SX/EW facility with a capacity of 500 million pounds of copper cathode per year from a 125,000 metric ton-per-day125,000-metric-ton-per-day crushed leach circuit and a similar-sized ROM leaching operation. The available fleet consists of twenty-two 266-metric tontwenty-three 242-metric-ton haul trucks loaded by four electric shovels with buckets ranging in size from 29 to 41 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 214,000217,000 metric tons of material per day. El Abra’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $707 million.


In April 2020, we revised our operating plans at El Abra. During 2021, El Abra returned to pre-April 2020 production levels. Further, increased mining and stacking activities are expected to result in a 30 percent increase in El Abra copper production for the year 2022, compared with the year 2021.

El Abra’s copper production totaled 200160 million pounds in 2018, 1732021, 159 million pounds in 20172020 and 220180 million pounds in 2016. Beginning in the second half of 2015, El Abra operated at reduced rates to achieve lower operating and labor costs, defer capital expenditures and extend the life of the existing operations. El Abra resumed operating at full capacity during 2018.2019.


We continue to evaluate a large-scale expansion at El Abra to process additional sulfide material and to achieve higher copper recoveries. El Abra’sAbra's large sulfide resource could potentially support a major mill project similar to the facilities constructed at Cerro Verde.Verde in 2015. Technical and economic studies are being advancedcontinue to be evaluated to determine the optimal scope and timing for the project.sulfide project, and we are engaging stakeholders and preparing data required for submission of a robust permit application. We are monitoring potential changes in regulatory and fiscal matters in Chile and will defer major investment decisions pending clarity on these matters.


El Abra is located in a desert environment with rainfall averaging less than one inch per year and is in an active seismic zone. Refer to MD&A and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of recent weather-related events at El Abra that are expected to impact its production volumes and costs. The highest bench elevation is 4,1954,225 meters above sea level and the ultimate pit bottom is expected to be 3,4153,385 meters above sea level. El Abra controls a total of approximately 169,400183,600 acres of mining claims covering the ore deposit, stockpiles, process plant, and water wellfield and pipeline. In addition, El Abra has land surface rights for the road between the processing plant and the mine, the water wellfield, power transmission lines and for the water pipeline from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer.


El Abra currently receives electrical power under a long-term contract with Engie Energia Chile S.A. Water for our El Abra processing operations comes from the continued pumping of groundwater from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer pursuant to regulatory approval. We believe El Abra has sufficient water rights and regulatory approvals to support current operations. For a discussion of risks associated with the availability of water, referRefer to “Governmental Regulations” above and Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”Factors” for further discussion.


18

Indonesia
grasberg_mineralsdistricta10.jpgfcx-20211231_g12.jpg


Ownership. PT-FI is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the Republic of Indonesia. On December 21, 2018, we completed the transaction with the IndonesianIndonesia government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership (refer to Note 2 for further discussion)(the 2018 transaction). Following the 2018 transaction, we have a 48.76 percent share ownership in PT-FI and the remaining 51.24 percent share ownership is collectively held by PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminum (Persero) (PT Inalum, (an Indonesianalso known as MIND ID), an Indonesia state-owned enterprise)enterprise, and PTI (whichPT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral (formerly known as PT Indocopper Investama), which is expected to be owned by PT Inalum and the provincial/regional government in Papua, Indonesia).Indonesia. The arrangements related to the 2018 transaction also provide for us and the other pre-transaction PT-FI shareholders to initially retain the economics of the revenue and cost sharing arrangements under the former unincorporated joint venture with Rio Tinto Joint Venture.plc (Rio Tinto). As a result, our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022.2022 and 48.76 percent thereafter.


IUPK.IUPK. Concurrent with closing the 2018 transaction, the IndonesianIndonesia government granted PT-FI an IUPKa new special mining license (IUPK) to replace its former COW,Contract of Work (COW), enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend mining rights through 2041, subject to PT-FI completing the construction of a new smelteradditional domestic smelting capacity in Indonesia within five years of closing the transaction(the schedule for which is under discussion) and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the IndonesianIndonesia government. The IUPK, and related documentation, contains legal and fiscal terms and is legally enforceable through 2041. In addition, we, as a foreign investor, have rights to resolve investment disputes with the IndonesianIndonesia government through international

arbitration. Refer to Note 13 and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK and risks associated with our Indonesia mining operations.


In March 2021, PT-FI has applied forreceived a one-year extension of its export license which currently expires on February 16, 2019.through March 15, 2022. Export licenses are valid for a one year periods,period, subject to review and approval by the IndonesianIndonesia government every six months, depending on greenfield smelter constructiondevelopment progress.


Indonesia Smelter Capacity. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend its mining rights through 2041, subject to, among other things, PT-FI’s completion of construction of additional domestic smelting capacity totaling 2 million metric tons of concentrate per year by the end of 2023 (an extension of which has been requested due to COVID-19 mitigation measures subject to the approval of the Indonesia government), and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the Indonesia government. During 2020, PT-FI notified the Indonesia government of schedule delays resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to discuss with the Indonesia government a deferred schedule for development of the greenfield smelter. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” MD&A and Notes 12 and 13 for additional discussion of the Indonesia smelter projects.

19

Grasberg Minerals District. PT-FI operates in the remote highlands of the Sudirman Mountain Range in the province of Papua, Indonesia, which is on the western half of the island of New Guinea. Since 1967, we and our predecessors have been the only operator of exploration and mining activities in the approximately 24,600-acre operating area. The operating area is accessible by portsite facilities (Arafura Sea) and by the Timika airport. The project site is located at latitude 4.08 degrees south and longitude 137.12 degrees east using the WGS 84 coordinate system. The project area includes a 70-mile main service road from portsite to the mill complex.


The Grasberg minerals district has three operatingincludes the following underground mines that are being operated; the Grasberg open pit,Block Cave, the Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) and Big Gossan. During 2021, we began development of the Kucing Liar underground ore body and the Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) underground mine and the Big Gossanceased production. The ramp-up of underground mine. In September 2015, PT-FI initiated pre-commercial production which represents ore extracted during the development phase for the purpose of obtaining access to the ore body, at the Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) underground mine.

As further discussed in MD&A, PT-FI continues to advance several projects in the Grasberg minerals district relatedin Indonesia continues to the developmentadvance on schedule. During 2021, a total of its large-scale, long-lived, high-grade underground ore bodies located beneath and nearby139 new drawbells were added at the Grasberg Block Cave and DMLZ underground mines, bringing cumulative open pit. In aggregate, these underground ore bodies are expecteddrawbells to produce large-scale quantities of copper and gold following the transition from the Grasberg open pit operations where PT-FI is currently mining the final phase.510. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with development projects and underground mines.


Substantial progress has been made to prepare for the transition to mining ofProduction from the Grasberg Block Cave (GBC) underground mine. First undercut blasting occurred in September 2018, first drawbell blasting occurred in December 2018 and cave production is scheduled for the first half of 2019. All underground mining levels and the ore flow system are being commissioned. As PT-FI transitions mining from the open pit to underground, its production is expected to be significantly lower in 2019 and 2020, compared to 2018. Metal production is expected to improve significantly by 2021 following a ramp-up period. GBC production rates over the next five years are expected to ramp up to 130,000 metric tons of ore per day.

PT-FI’s production, including the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture share,minerals district totaled 1.21.3 billion pounds of copper and 2.71.4 million ounces of gold in 2018, 1.02021, 0.8 billion pounds of copper and 1.60.8 million ounces of gold in 2017,2020, and 1.10.6 billion pounds of copper and 1.10.9 million ounces of gold in 2016.2019. PT-FI’s net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs at December 31, 2021, totaled $15.1 billion.


Our principal source of power for all of our Indonesia operations is a coal-fired power plant that we built in 1998. Diesel generators supply peaking and backup electrical power generating capacity.capacity; however, beginning in 2022, our new dual-fuel power plant is expected eventually to provide up to approximately 40 percent of PT-FI’s power needs. A combination of naturally occurring mountain streams and water derived from our underground operations provides water for our operations. Our IndonesianIndonesia operations are in an active seismic zone and experience average annual rainfall of approximately 200 inches.


Grasberg Open Pit  Block Cave Underground Mine
PT-FI began open-pit mining of theThe Grasberg Block Cave ore body in 1990. PT-FI is currently mining the final phase ofsame ore body historically mined from the surface in the Grasberg open pitpit. Undercutting, drawbell construction and expects to transition to the GBCore extraction activities in the first halfGrasberg Block Cave underground mine continue to track expectations. Monitoring data on cave propagation in the Grasberg Block Cave underground mine is providing confidence in growing production rates over time. As existing drawpoints mature and additional drawpoints are added, cave expansion is expected to accelerate production rates to an average of 2019.over 105,000 metric tons of ore per day in 2022 and 122,000 metric tons of ore per day in 2023 from five production blocks spanning 335,000 square meters. As of December 31, 2021, the Grasberg Block Cave underground mine had 336 open drawbells.


ProductionOre milled from the ore stockpiles, which are located outside ofGrasberg Block Cave underground mine averaged 70,600 metric tons per day in 2021, 30,800 metric tons per day in 2020 and 8,600 metric tons per day in 2019. Production at the pit limits,Grasberg Block Cave underground mine is expected to continue through the end of 2019. Production in the open pit is currently at the 3,265- to 3,055-meter elevation level and totaled 49 million metric tons of ore in 2018, which provided 75 percent of PT-FI’s 2018 mill feed.2041.


The current open-pit equipmentGrasberg Block Cave fleet consists of over 500 units.approximately 580 pieces of mobile equipment. The largerprimary mining equipment directly associated with production and development includes an available fleet of 9988 LHD units and 33 haul trucks with payloads of 200 metric tons and 15 shovels with bucket sizes ranging from 17 to 42 cubic meters, which are capable of moving an average of 275,000trucks. Each production LHD unit typically carries approximately 11 metric tons of materialore and transfers ore into the rail haulage system. The Grasberg Block Cave has a rail haulage system currently operating with 10 locomotives and 120 ore wagons that haul the ore to the first 2 of the 3 planned gyratory crushers located underground via an automated rail system. Each ore wagon typically carries 30 metric tons.

DMLZ Underground Mine
The DMLZ ore body lies below the DOZ underground mine at the 2,590-meter elevation and represents the downward continuation of mineralization in the Ertsberg East Skarn system and neighboring Ertsberg porphyry.

The DMLZ has continued its ramp-up of production. Hydraulic fracturing operations have been effective in managing rock stresses and pre-conditioning the cave following mining-induced seismic activity experienced from time to time. Ongoing hydraulic fracturing operations combined with continued undercutting and drawbell openings in the two currently active production blocks are expected to expand the cave, supporting higher production rates that are expected to average approximately 68,000 metric tons of ore per day.day in 2022 and 69,000 metric tons of ore per day in 2023 from three production blocks. As of December 31, 2021, the DMLZ underground mine had 174 open drawbells.

20

Ore milled from the Grasberg open pitDMLZ underground mine averaged 133,30058,000 metric tons per day in 2018, 101,8002021, 28,600 metric tons per day in 20172020 and 119,7009,800 metric tons per day in 2016.2019. Production at the DMLZ underground mine is expected to continue through 2041.



The DMLZ fleet consists of over 390 pieces of mobile equipment, which includes 63 LHD units and 34 haul trucks used in production and development activities. Each production LHD unit typically carries approximately 11 metric tons of ore and transfers ore into the truck haulage system. The haul trucks have a capacity of 55 to 60 metric tons and load ore from chutes fed by the LHDs and transfer it to one of two gyratory crushers. The crushed ore is conveyed to surface stockpiles for processing.

Big Gossan Underground Mine
The Big Gossan ore body lies underground and adjacent to the current mill site. It is a tabular, near vertical ore body with approximate dimensions of 1,200 meters along strike and 800 meters down dip with varying thicknesses from 20 meters to 120 meters. The mine utilizes a blasthole stoping method with delayed paste backfill. Stopes of varying sizes are mined and the ore dropped down passes to a truck haulage level. Trucks are chute loaded and transport the ore to a jaw crusher. The crushed ore is then hoisted vertically via a two-skip production shaft to a level where it is loaded onto a conveyor belt. The belt carries the ore to one of the main underground conveyors where the ore is transferred and conveyed to the surface stockpiles for processing.

Ore milled from the Big Gossan underground mine averaged approximately 7,500 metric tons per day in 2021, 7,000 metric tons per day in 2020 and 6,100 metric tons per day in 2019. Production at the Big Gossan underground mine is expected to continue through 2041.

The Big Gossan fleet consists of over 90 pieces of mobile equipment, which includes 14 LHD units and 10 haul trucks used in development and production activities.

Kucing Liar Underground Mine
PT-FI commenced long-term mine development activities for its Kucing Liar deposit in October 2021, which is expected to produce over 6 billion pounds of copper and 5 million ounces of gold between 2028 and the end of 2041. The Kucing Liar underground deposit lies on the southern flank of and underneath the southern portion of the Grasberg open pit at the 2,605-meter elevation level. Similar to PT-FI's experience with large-scale, block-cave mines, pre-production development activities will occur over an approximate 10-year timeframe. At full operating rates of 90,000 metric tons of ore per day, annual production from Kucing Liar is expected to approximate 600 million pounds of copper and 500,000 ounces of gold, providing PT-FI with sustained long-term, large-scale and low-cost production. Capital investments for Kucing Liar over the next 10 years are expected to average approximately $400 million per year. Kucing Liar will benefit from substantial shared infrastructure and PT-FI's experience and long-term success in block-cave mining.

DOZ Underground Mine
The DOZ ore body lies vertically below the now depleted Intermediate Ore Zone. PT-FI began production from the DOZ ore body in 1989 using open-stope mining methods, but suspended production in 1991 in favor of production fromand the Grasberg open pit. Production resumed in 2000 using the block-cave method and isore body was depleted at the 3,110-meter elevation level.

The DOZ is a mature block-cave mine that previously operated at 80,000 metric tonsend of ore per day. Current operating rates from the DOZ underground mine are driven by the value of the incremental DOZ ore grade compared to the ore from the Grasberg open pit and ore grade material from the development of the DMLZ and GBC underground mines.2021. Ore milled from the DOZ underground mine averaged 33,800 metric tons of ore per day in 2018, 31,200 metric tons of ore per day in 2017 and 38,000 metric tons of ore per day in 2016. Production at the DOZ underground mine is expected to continue through 2022.

The DOZ mine fleet consists of 154 pieces of mobile equipment. The primary mining equipment directly associated with production and development includes an available fleet of 44 LHD units and 20 haul trucks. Each production LHD unit typically carries approximately 11 metric tons of ore. Using ore passes and chutes, the LHD units transfer ore into 55 to 60 metric ton capacity haul trucks. The trucks dump into two gyratory crushers, and the ore is then conveyed to the surface stockpiles for processing.

Big Gossan Underground Mine
The Big Gossan mine lies underground and adjacent to the current mill site. It is a tabular, near vertical ore body with approximate dimensions of 1,200 meters along strike and 800 meters down dip with varying thicknesses from 20 meters to 120 meters. The mine utilizes a blasthole stoping method with delayed paste backfill. Stopes of varying sizes are mined and the ore dropped down passes to a truck haulage level. Trucks are chute loaded and transport the ore to a jaw crusher. The crushed ore is then hoisted vertically via a two-skip production shaft to a level where it is loaded onto a conveyor belt. The belt carries the ore to one of the main underground conveyors where the ore is transferred and conveyed to the surface stockpiles for processing.

Ore milled from the Big Gossan underground mine averaged 3,8008,700 metric tons per day in 2018, 6002021, 20,900 metric tons per day in 20172020 and 90025,500 metric tons per day in 2016. Production at2019.

Grasberg Open Pit  
PT-FI began open-pit mining of the Big Gossan underground mine is expected to continue through 2041.

The Big Gossan mine fleet consists of over 78 pieces of mobile equipment, which includes 13 LHD units and 10 haul trucks used in development and production activities.

DMLZ Underground Mine
The DMLZGrasberg ore body lies belowin 1990 and the DOZ underground mine atfinal phase was mined during 2019. In aggregate, the 2,590-meter elevationGrasberg open pit produced over 27 billion pounds of copper and represents the downward continuation46 million ounces of mineralizationgold in the Ertsberg East Skarn system and neighboring Ertsberg porphyry.30-year period from 1990 through 2019.


During third-quarter 2018, PT-FI commenced hydraulic fracturing activities to manage rock stresses and
pre-condition the DMLZ underground mine for large-scale production following mining induced seismic activity experienced in 2017 and 2018. Results to date have been effective in managing rock stresses and pre-conditioning the cave. PT-FI expects to commence the ramp-up of production in the DMLZ underground mine by mid-2019 and to reach full production rates of 80,000 metric tons per day in 2022. Estimates of timing of future production continue to be reviewed and may be modified as additional information becomes available. Production at the DMLZ underground mine is expected to continue through 2041.

Ore milled from the DMLZ underground mine averaged 3,200 metric tons of ore per day in both 2018 and 2017, and 4,400 metric tons per day in 2016.

The DMLZ mine fleet consists of over 240 pieces of mobile equipment, which includes 25 LHD units and 14 haul trucks used in production and development activities.

Description of Indonesia Ore Bodies. Our Indonesia ore bodies are located within and around two main igneous intrusions, the Grasberg monzodiorite and the Ertsberg diorite. The host rocks of these ore bodies include both carbonate and clastic rocks that form the ridge crests and upper flanks of the Sudirman Range, and the igneous rocks of monzonitic to dioritic composition that intrude them. The igneous-hosted ore bodies (the Grasberg open pit and GBC,Block Cave and portions of the DOZ)DMLZ) occur as vein stockworks and disseminations of copper sulfides, dominated by chalcopyrite and, to a lesser extent, bornite. The sedimentary-rock hosted ore bodies (portions of the DOZDMLZ and Kucing Liar and all of

the Big Gossan) occur as “magnetite-rich, calcium/magnesian skarn” replacements, whose location and orientation are strongly influenced by major faults and by the chemistry of the carbonate rocks along the margins of the intrusions.

21

The copper mineralization in these skarn deposits is dominated by chalcopyrite, but higher bornite concentrations are common. Moreover, gold occurs in significant concentrations in all of the district’s ore bodies, though rarely visible to the naked eye. These gold concentrations usually occur as inclusions within the copper sulfide minerals, though, in some deposits, these concentrations can also be strongly associated with pyrite.


The following diagram indicates the relative elevations (in meters) of our reported Indonesia ore bodies.
fcx-20211231_g13.jpg

The following map, which encompasses an area of 42 square kilometers, (16 square miles), indicates the relative positions and sizes of our reported Indonesia ore bodies and their locations.
fcx-20211231_g14.jpg


22

Smelting Facilities and Other Mining Properties
Atlantic Copper. Our wholly owned Atlantic Copper smelter and refinery is located on land concessions from the Huelva, Spain, port authorities, which are scheduled to expire in 2039.


The design capacity of the smelter is approximately 300,000 metric tons of copper per year, and the refinery has a capacity of 286,000 metric tons of copper per year. Atlantic Copper produced 295,300Copper’s anode production from its smelter totaled 278,600 metric tons of copper anodein 2021, 275,900 metric tons in 2020 and 272,000 metric tons in 2019. Copper cathode production from its smelter and 283,100refinery totaled 277,000 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2018; 283,1002021, 275,000 metric tons of copper anode from its smelterin 2020 and 271,400268,300 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2017; and 296,900 metric tons of copper anode from its smelter and 285,800 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2016.2019.


Following is a summarythe allocation of Atlantic Copper’s concentrate purchases from unaffiliated third parties and our copper mining operations for the years ended December 31:
 202120202019
Third parties66 %79 %73 %
North America copper mines18 10 22 
Indonesia mining
South America mining
 100 %100 %100 %
 2018 2017 2016 
Third parties77% 67% 77% 
North America copper mines14
 18
 13
 
South America mining5
 15
 7
 
Indonesia mining4
 
 3
 
 100% 100% 100% 


Atlantic Copper’s major maintenance turnarounds typically occur approximately every eight years, with shorter-term maintenance turnarounds in the interim. Atlantic Copper last completed a 79-day major maintenance turnaround in 2013 and most recently completed a 16-day maintenance turnaround in 2015 and a 27-day maintenance turnaround in 2017. A 15-day2019. The next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for third-quarter 2019.the first half of 2022.


PT Smelting. PT-FI’s former COW required us to construct, or cause to be constructed, a smelter in Indonesia if we and the Indonesian government determined that such a project would be economically viable. In 1995, following the completion of a feasibility study, we entered into agreements relating to the formation of PT Smelting, an IndonesianIndonesia company, owns and the construction of theoperates a copper smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia. PT Smelting owns and operatesOn April 30, 2021, PT-FI acquired an additional 14.5 percent of the smelter and refinery. PT-FI owns 25 percentoutstanding common stock of PT Smelting with the remainder owned byfor $33 million, increasing its ownership interest to 39.5 percent. Mitsubishi Materials Corporation (60.5 percent),owns the remaining 60.5 percent.

In November 2021, PT-FI completed agreements with Mitsubishi Materials Corporation RtM Japan Ltd. (9.5 percent) and JX Nippon Mining & Metals Corporation (5 percent).to implement the expansion of PT Smelting’s capacity by 30 percent to 1.3 million metric tons of concentrate per year, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2023 in connection with PT-FI’s commitment to develop additional smelting capacity in Indonesia. Refer to Note 2 for discussion of PT-FI’s loan to PT Smelting.


PT-FI’s contract with PT Smelting requiresprovides for PT-FI to supply 100 percent of the copper concentrate requirements (at market rates subject(subject to a minimum or maximum treatment charge rate) necessary for PT Smelting to produce 205,000 metric tons of copper annually on a priority basis. PT-FI may also sell copper concentrate to PT Smelting at market rates for quantities in excess of 205,000 metric tons of copper annually. PT-FI supplied 90100 percent of PT Smelting’s concentrate requirements in 2018, 932021, 74 percent in 20172020 and 8890 percent in 2016.2019.


In early 2017, the IndonesianIndonesia government issued new regulations to address exports of unrefined metals, including copper concentrate and anode slimes, and other matters related to the mining sector. These regulations permit the export of anode slimes, which is necessary for PT Smelting to continue operating. As a result of labor disturbances and a delay in the renewal of its export license for anode slimes, PT Smelting’s operations were shut down from mid-January 2017 until early March 2017.In December 2021, PT Smelting has applied forreceived a one-yeartwelve-month extension of its anode slimes export license, which currently expires February 26, 2019.December 9, 2022, subject to review and approval by the Indonesia government every six months. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.


PT Smelting produced 258,800Smelting’s anode production from its smelter totaled 280,400 metric tons of copper anodein 2021, 276,900 metric tons in 2020 and 246,100 metric tons in 2019. Copper cathode production from its smelter and 257,600refinery totaled 256,900 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2018; 245,8002021, 273,000 metric tons of copper anode from its smelterin 2020 and 247,800241,200 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2017; and 255,700 metric tons of copper anode from its smelter and 241,700 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2016.2019.


PT Smelting’s maintenance turnarounds (which range from two weeks to a month to complete) typically are expected to occur approximately every two years, with short-term maintenance turnarounds in the interim. The next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for 2020. PT Smelting completed a 25-day maintenance turnaround during 2016, and a 30-day maintenance turnaround during 2018.December 2020, and the next major turnaround is scheduled for the second half of 2022. In addition, to PT Smelting’s scheduled annual maintenance in November 2018, PT Smelting also experienced downtime in December 2018 caused by unscheduled maintenance athas a planned 75-day shutdown scheduled for the first half of 2023 associated with its sole-source oxygen supplier. This resulted in a temporary shutdownexpansion project.


23


Miami Smelter. We own and operate a smelter at our Miami mining operation in Arizona. The smelter has been operating for approximatelyover 100 years and has been upgraded numerous times during that period to implement new technologies, improve production and comply with air quality requirements. In 2018, the Miami smelter completed the installation of emission control equipment that allows it to operate in compliance with current air quality standards. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.


The Miami smelter processes copper concentrate primarily from our North America copper mines. Concentrate processed through the smelter totaled 729,900674,000 metric tons in 2018, 612,6002021, 764,000 metric tons in 20172020 and 673,300641,000 metric tons in 2016.2019. In addition, because sulphuricsulfuric acid is a by-product of smelting concentrate, the Miami smelter is also the most significant source of sulphuricsulfuric acid for our North America leaching operations.


Major maintenance turnarounds (which take approximately three weeks to complete) are anticipated to occur approximately every two or three years for the Miami smelter, with short-term maintenance turnarounds in the interim. The Miami smelter completedsmelter. We performed a major maintenance turnaround in second-quarter 2017, and theduring 2021. The next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for 2020.      the first half of 2024.


Rod & Refining Operations. Our Rod & Refining operations consist of conversion facilities located in North America, including a refinery in El Paso, Texas;Texas and rod mills in El Paso, Texas, Norwich, Connecticut, and Miami, Arizona; and a specialty copper products facility in Bayway, New Jersey.Arizona. We refine our copper anode production from our Miami smelter at our El Paso refinery. The El Paso refinery has the potential to operate at an annual production capacity of about 900 million pounds of copper cathode, which is sufficient to refine all of the copper anode we produce at our Miami smelter. Our El Paso refinery also produces nickel carbonate, copper telluride and autoclaved slimes material containing gold, silver, platinum and palladium.


Molybdenum Conversion Facilities. We process molybdenum concentrate at our conversion plants in the U.S. and Europe into such products as technical-grade molybdic oxide, ferromolybdenum, pure molybdic oxide, ammonium molybdates and molybdenum disulfide. We operate molybdenum roasters in Sierrita, Arizona; Fort Madison, Iowa; and Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and we operate a molybdenum pressure-leach plant in Bagdad, Arizona. We also produce ferromolybdenum for customers worldwide at our conversion plant located in Stowmarket, United Kingdom.


Freeport Cobalt. In March 2013, we acquired a cobalt chemical refinery in Kokkola, Finland, and the related sales and marketing business which provided direct end-market access for the cobalt hydroxide production at the Tenke Fungurume (Tenke) mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo, in which we held an interest prior to our sale of TF Holdings Limited (TFHL) in 2016. We are the operator of Freeport Cobalt with an effective 56 percent ownership interest. The remaining effective ownership interest is held by Lundin Mining Corporation (24 percent) and La Générale des Carrières et des Mines (20 percent). The Kokkola refinery has an annual refining capacity of approximately 15,000 metric tons of cobalt.

As further discussed in Note 2, we continue to market the Freeport Cobalt assets.

Other North America Copper Mines. We also have five non-operating copper mines - Ajo, Bisbee, Tohono, Twin Buttes and Christmas, which are located in Arizona - that have been on care-and-maintenancecare and maintenance status for several years and would require new or updated environmental studies, new permits, and additional capital investment, which could be significant, to return them to operating status.


Mining Development Projects and Exploration ActivitiesMINING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES

Capital expenditures totaled $2.1 billion (including $1.25 billion for mining operations totaledmajor projects and $0.2 billion for Indonesia smelter projects) in 2021, $2.0 billion (including $1.2 billion for major projects and $0.1 billion for Indonesia smelter projects) in 2018, $1.42020 and $2.65 billion (including $0.9$1.5 billion for major projects) in 2017 and $1.6 billion (including $1.2 billion for major projects) in 2016.2019. Capital expenditures for major projects during 20182021, 2020 and 2019 were primarily associated with underground development activities in the Grasberg minerals district and development of the Lone Star oxide project. Capital expenditures for major projects during 2017 and 2016 were primarily associated with the Cerro Verde expansioncopper leach project and ongoing underground development activitiesat our Safford mine, which was completed in the Grasberg minerals district.second half of 2020. Refer to MD&A for projected capital expenditures for the year 2019.2022.

PT-FI has also committed to construct a new smelter in Indonesia by December 21, 2023. PT-FI is initiating front-end engineering and design and intends to pursue financing, commercial and potential partner arrangements for this project, which has a preliminary estimated capital cost in the $3 billion range. The economics of the new smelter will be borne by PT-FI’s shareholders according to their respective long-term share ownership percentages.


We have several projects and potential opportunities to expand production volumes, extend mine lives and develop large-scale underground ore bodies. As further discussed in MD&A, our near-term major development projects primarily includewill focus on the underground development activities in the Grasberg minerals district and development of the Lone Star oxide project.district. Considering the long-term nature and large size of our development projects, actual costs and timing could vary from estimates. Additionally, in response to market conditions, the timing of our expenditures will continue to be reviewed. We continue to review our mine development and processing plans to maximize the value of our mineral reserves.


We also have an additional long-termAdditionally, full development of PT-FI’s underground mine development project inmineral reserves at the Grasberg minerals district for the Kucing Liar ore body, which lies on the southern flank of and underneath the southern portion of the Grasberg open pit at the 2,605-meter elevation level. We expect to mine the Kucing Liar ore body using the block-cave method; aggregate capital cost estimates for development of the Kucing Liar ore body are projected to approximate $3.8 billion (which areis expected to require approximately $3 billion (most of which will be made between 2020 and 2032). Additionally, our current mine development plans include approximately $6.0 billionincurred over an approximate 12-year period) of capital expenditures at our processing facilities to optimize the handling of underground ore types oncefrom the Grasberg open-pit operations cease. We expect substantially allBlock Cave, DMLZ and Kucing Liar deposits. Increases in power loads at these processing facilities and the underground mines are expected to require additional power generation with capital expenditures approximating $0.6 billion for new dual-fuel power generation, upgrades to existing transmission lines, and refurbishment of these expenditures to be made between 2019 and 2034. The timing and developmentthe existing three coal units.


24

Table of this project is currently being reviewed.Contents

Our mining exploration activities are generallyprimarily associated with our existing mines, focusing on opportunities to expand mineral reserves and mineral resources to support development of additional future production capacity. Exploration results continue to indicate opportunities for significant future potential reserve additions at our existing properties in North America and South America. Exploration spending associated with mining operations totaled $78$50 million in 2018, $722021, $34 million in 20172020 and $44$77 million in 2016. Refer to MD&A for projected exploration expenditures for the year 2019.


Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion of risks associated with mine development projects and exploration activities, and of risks associated with PT-FI’s IUPK.


Sources and Availability of Energy, Natural Resources and Raw MaterialsSOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF ENERGY, NATURAL RESOURCES AND RAW MATERIALS

Our copper mining operations require significant amounts of energy, principally diesel, electricity, coal and natural gas, most of which is obtained from third parties under long-term contracts. Energy represented approximately 2021 percent of our copper mine site operating costs in 2018,2021, including purchases of approximately 220 million gallons of diesel fuel; 8,150approximately 8,000 gigawatt hours of electricity at our North America and South America copper mining operations (we generate all of our power at our Indonesia mining operation); 740approximately 750 thousand metric tons of coal for our coal power plant in Indonesia; and approximately 1 million MMBtu (million British thermal units) of natural gas at certain of our North America mines. Based on current cost estimates, energy willis expected to approximate 2025 percent of our copper mine site operating costs in 2019.2022.


Our mining operations also require significant quantities of water for mining, ore processing and related support facilities. The loss of water rights for any of our mines, in whole or in part, or shortages of water to which we have rights, could require us to curtail or shut down mining operations. For a further discussion of risks and legal proceedings associated with the availability of water, refer to “Governmental Regulations” above, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings.”


SulphuricSulfuric acid is used in the SX/EW process and is produced as a by-product of the smelting process at our smelters and from our sulfur burners at the Safford mine. SulphuricSulfuric acid needs in excess of the sulphuricsulfuric acid produced by our operations are purchased from third parties.


CommunityHUMAN CAPITAL

We are committed to promoting the health, safety and Human Rightswell-being of our workforce and striving to further strengthen our commitment to promoting an inclusive, diverse and agile workplace. We believe our global workforce is the foundation of our success. Our Board of Directors (Board) oversees our policies and implementation programs that govern our approach to management of our human capital, with the Board’s Corporate Responsibility Committee having oversight of health and safety matters and the Board’s Compensation Committee having oversight of other human capital matters, including those relating to workforce recruitment, retention and development, pay equity and inclusion and diversity.

Workforce
At December 31, 2021, we had approximately 24,700 employees (11,600 in North America, 6,100 in Indonesia, 6,000 in South America and 1,000 in Europe and other locations). We also had contractors that employ personnel at many of our operations, including approximately 22,200 at the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia, 13,600 in North America, 6,100 at our South America mining operations and 600 in Europe and other locations.

Approximately 31 percent of our global employee population is covered by collective labor agreements (CLA), with 14 percent covered by a CLA that will or was scheduled to expire in 2022. In North America, our workforce is not covered by a CLA. Our North America hourly employees choose to work directly with management utilizing our Guiding Principles, which sets out how we work together within the values of the company to achieve our collective goals.


25


Employees covered by CLAs on December 31, 2021, are listed below, with the number of employees covered and the expiration date of the applicable CLA:

LocationNumber of UnionsNumber of
Union-
Represented Employees
Expiration Date
PT-FI - Indonesia32,990 March 2022a
Cerro Verde - Peru23,183 August 2024 and August 2025
El Abra - Chile2781 April 2023
Atlantic Copper - Spain3517 December 2022
Rotterdam - The Netherlands155 September 2022
Stowmarket - United Kingdom140 May 2023
a.In February 2022, PT-FI completed negotiations with its unions on a new two-year CLA that is effective through March 2024.

We engage openly with our employee and union leadership to negotiate and uphold labor agreements, recognizing that labor disruptions such as prolonged strikes or other work stoppages can adversely affect our business operations, our workforce and regional stakeholders. There were no strikes or lockouts at any of our operations in 2021.

Health and Safety
Our highest priority is the health, safety and well-being of our employees and contractors. We also instill health and safety processes for our suppliers and the communities where we operate. We believe that health and safety considerations are integral to, and fundamental for, all other functions in our organization, and we understand that the health and safety of our workforce is critical to our operational efficiency and long-term success. Our global health and safety approach, “Safe Production Matters,” is focused on fatality prevention and continuous improvement through the use of robust management systems, empowering safe work behaviors and strengthening our safety culture.

We focus on fatality prevention through the use of data and technology as well as behavioral science principles. Our framework for managing risks and compliance obligations is certified company wide in accordance with the new ISO 45001 Health and Safety Management System (ISO 45001), most recently certified in September 2021. ISO 45001 requires third-party site-level verification of requirements, with a goal to prevent fatalities and reduce safety incidents.

As part of our commitment to providing a safe and healthy workplace, we strive to provide the training, tools and resources needed so our workforce can identify risks and consistently apply effective controls. We share information and key learnings about potentially fatal events, near misses and best practices throughout the company and engage with industry peers outside the organization to continuously improve our health and safety performance. We also review and discuss all fatalities with the Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Board.

Our objective is to achieve zero workplace fatalities and to decrease injuries and occupational illnesses. We measure our safety performance through regularly established benchmarks, including our company-wide Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR), which includes both employees and contractors. In 2021, regrettably, we had 3 workplace fatal events, 2 work related and 1 not yet classified as either an independent medical episode or work related, and 17 potential fatal events (PFEs), compared to 5 fatalities and 12 PFEs in 2020. Overall, the percentage of high risk incidents has trended down from 11 percent in 2019 to 7 percent in 2020 and 2021. Our TRIR per 200,000 man-hours worked was 0.69 in both 2021 and 2020, meeting our 2021 and 2020 targets. The metal mining sector industry average per 200,000 man-hours worked reported by MSHA was 1.70 for 2021 (preliminary for the period of January 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021) and 1.66 in 2020.

In 2021, we continued to take steps to protect our workforce from COVID-19, including by continuing operating protocols at each of our operating sites to contain and mitigate the risk of spread of COVID-19. We will continue to monitor, assess and update our COVID-19 response and to provide assistance to employees in obtaining vaccinations. We are committed to the communities where we operate and continue to work closely with them, including providing monetary support and in-kind contributions of medical supplies and food. To support our
26


employees around the world, we adjusted our policies for sick leave and other pay practices to encourage ill employees to stay home. We also implemented a policy to allow those who can work remotely to do so. During the pandemic and looking beyond, we have committed to maintaining health benefits and offer guidance resources to support mental and physical well-being.

Employee Engagement, Training and Development
We operate in regions of varying ethnic, religious and cultural backgrounds, and we often are the largest employer in our local communities. A key to our success is the ability to recruit, retain, develop and advance talented employees with diverse perspectives.

In addition to the health, safety and well-being of our global workforce, we have prioritized a flexible, highly engaged and agile workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified our focus on the need for, and receptivity to, innovation across all facets of the business, particularly in how we communicate, engage and collaborate across our global workforce in a more virtual environment.

We are committed to ongoing training and development of our workforce. We focus on attracting and retaining talented people by offering quality employment with competitive compensation and benefits as well as opportunities for professional development and growth. Strategic talent reviews and succession planning occur regularly and across all business areas. To support the advancement of our employees, we offer training and development programs encouraging advancement from within and continue to promote strong and experienced management talent. We leverage both formal and informal programs to identify, foster and retain top talent at both the corporate and operations levels.

Additionally, hiring locally is a commitment we make to the communities surrounding our operations and to our host countries. Most people employed at our operations are host country nationals. We retain expatriate expertise for managerial and technical roles only when it is not available in local communities. To further these efforts, expatriates receive cultural training upon their arrival to a new location.

Inclusion and Diversity
We are committed to fostering a culture that is safety focused, respectful, inclusive and representative of the communities where we operate. We respect and value the different ideas, beliefs, experiences, talents, skills, perspectives, backgrounds and cultures of our workforce. We strive for, promote and foster a workplace where everyone feels a sense of belonging, is treated with respect and their opinions are valued. We believe an inclusive environment gives our people the confidence to speak up, share ideas that drive innovation, and achieve operational excellence. Our inclusive environment is the foundation of our high-performance culture and is paramount to the long-term sustainable success of our business.

Our inclusion and diversity principles align with our core values of safety, respect, integrity, excellence and commitment, and are reflected in our Inclusion and Diversity Policy, our Principles of Business Conduct and other related policies.

Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further information on human capital matters.

COMMUNITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS

We have adopted policies that govern our working relationships with the communities where we operate and that are designed to guide our practices and programs in a manner that respects human rights and the culture of the local people impacted by our operations.


27


We continue to make significant expenditures on community development, health, education, training and cultural programs, which include:


comprehensive job training programs
clean water and sanitation projects
public health programs, including malaria control and human immunodeficiency virus
agricultural assistance programs
small and medium enterprise development programs
basic education programs
cultural promotion and preservation programs
community infrastructure development
charitable donations


In December 2000, we endorsed the joint U.S. State Department-British Foreign Office Voluntary Principles on Human Rights and Security (Voluntary Principles). We participated in developing these Voluntary Principles with other major natural resource companies and international human rights organizations and they are incorporated into our human rights policy. The Voluntary Principles provide guidelines for our security programs, including interaction with host-government security personnel, private security contractors and our internal security employees.


Our human rights policy, most recently updated in August 2017,December 2020, reflects our full commitment to implementing the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We have embarked on a program to plan and conduct site-level human rights impact assessments (HRIA) at our global operations.


HRIAs help us to embed human rights considerations into our business practices, including site-level sustainable development risk registers. We completed a HRIA at our Cerro Verde operation in Peru in 2017 and at our New Mexico mining operations in 2018. During 2021, we substantially completed a HRIA at our El Abra operations in Chile and began a comprehensive HRIA for all of our Arizona sites including Morenci, Bagdad, Safford, Sierrita and Miami, which we expect to complete in the first half of 2022. We also participate in a multi-industry human rights working group to gain insight from peer companies. companies and experts in the field to learn how best practices are evolving.

We believe that our social and economic development programs are responsive to the issues raised by the local communities near our areas of operation and help us maintain good relations with the surrounding communities and avoid disruptions of mining operations. As part of our ongoing commitment to sustainableour community development,stakeholders, we make significanthave made and expect to continue making investments in certain social programs, including in-kind support and administration, across our global operations.operations from time to time. Over the last three years, these investments have averaged $150$124 million per year. Nevertheless, social and political instability in the areas of our operations may adversely impact our mining operations. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.


South America. Cerro Verde has provided a variety of community support projects over the years. Following engagements with regional and local governments, civic leaders and development agencies, in 2006, Cerro Verde committed to support the costs for a new potable water treatment plant to serve Arequipa. In addition, an agreement was reached with the PeruvianPeru government for development of a water storage network that was financed by Cerro Verde and a distribution network that was financed by the Cerro Verde Civil Association.


Cerro Verde reached an agreement with the Regional Government of Arequipa, the National Government, the local water utility company and other local institutions to allow it to finance, engineer and construct a wastewater treatment plant for the city of Arequipa, which was completed in 2015. The wastewater treatment plant supplements existing water supplies to support Cerro Verde’s concentrator expansion and also improves the local water quality, enhances agriculture products grown in the area and reduces the risk of waterborne illnesses. In addition to these projects, Cerro Verde annually makes significant community development investments in the Arequipa region.


Security Matters. Consistent with our operating permits in Peru and our commitment to protect our employees and property, we have taken steps to provide a safe and secure working environment. As part of its security program, Cerro Verde maintains its own internal security department. Both employees and contractors perform functions such as protecting company facilities, monitoring shipments of supplies and products, assisting in traffic control and aiding in emergency response operations. The security department receives human rights and Voluntary Principles training annually. Some contractors assigned to protection of expatriate personnel are armed. These contractors also receive training in defensive driving and firearms handling. Cerro Verde’s costs for its internal civilian security department totaled $8$7 million in both 20182021 and 20172020 and $6$9 million in 2016.2019.

28


Cerro Verde, like all businesses and residents of Peru, relies on the PeruvianPeru government for the maintenance of public order, upholding the rule of law and the protection of personnel and property. The PeruvianPeru government is responsible for employing police personnel and directing their operations. Cerro Verde has limited public security forces in support of its operation, with the arrangement defined through a memorandum of understanding with the PeruvianPeru National Police. Cerro Verde’s share of support costs for government-provided security approximated $1 million in each of the years 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.


Indonesia. In 1996, PT-FI established the Freeport Partnership Fund for Community Development (the Partnership Fund) through which PT-FI has made available funding and technical assistance to support community development initiatives in the areas of health, education, economic development and local infrastructure. PT-FI has committed through June 2019 to provide one percentfunding based on a percentage of its annual revenuerevenues through 2041 for the development of the local communities in its area of operations through the Partnership Fund. PT-FI recordedincurred costs of $55$75 million in 2018, $442021, $36 million in 20172020 and $33$28 million in 20162019 for this commitment.


The Amungme and Kamoro Community Development OrganizationThroughout 2019, PT-FI consulted with key stakeholders to restructure the management of the Partnership Fund in compliance with PT-FI’s IUPK. Throughout this process, PT-FI continued its contributions to ensure no disruptions in implementation of approved projects. Beginning in February 2020, the Partnership Fund is now managed by a legally recognized Indonesia foundation (Lembaga PengembanganYayasan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Amungme dan Kamoroor LPMAK) oversees disbursement of the program funds we contribute to the Partnership Fund. LPMAKYPMAK). YPMAK is governed by a boardBoard of commissioners and a boardGovernors consisting of directors, which are comprised ofseven representatives, including four from the local Amungme and Kamoro tribal communities, government leaders, church leaders, and one representative of PT-FI on each board. The Amungme and Kamoro people are original inhabitants of the land in our area of operations. PT-FI.

In addition to the Partnership Fund, PT-FI makes significanthas made and expects to continue making annual investments in public health, education, community infrastructure and local economic development.


Security Matters.Consistent with our ongoing commitment to protect our employees and property, we have taken steps to provide a safe and secure working environment. As part of its security program, PT-FI maintains its own internal civilian security department. Both employees and contractors are unarmed and perform functions such as protecting company facilities, monitoring shipments of supplies and products, assisting in traffic control and aiding in emergency response operations. The security department receives human rights training annually.


PT-FI’s costs for its internal civilian security department totaled $59$50 million in 2018, $542021, $47 million in 20172020 and $58$52 million in 2016.2019.


PT-FI, like all businesses and residents of Indonesia, relies on the IndonesianIndonesia government for the maintenance of public order, upholding the rule of law and protection of personnel and property. The Grasberg minerals district has been designated by the IndonesianIndonesia government as one of Indonesia’s vital national assets. This designation results in the police, and to a lesser extent, the military, playing a significant role in protecting the area of our operations. The IndonesianIndonesia government is responsible for employing police and military personnel and directing their operations.


From the outset of PT-FI’s operations, the IndonesianIndonesia government has looked to PT-FI to provide logistical and infrastructure support and assistance for these necessary services because of the limited resources of the IndonesianIndonesia government and the remote location of and lack of development in Papua. PT-FI’s financial support of the IndonesianIndonesia government security institutions assigned to PT-FI’s operations area represents a prudent response to PT-FI’s requirements and commitments to protect its workforce and property and better ensuring that personnel are properly fed and lodged and have the logistical resources to patrol PT-FI’s roads and secure its area of operations. In addition, the provision of such support is consistent with our philosophy of responsible corporate citizenship, and reflects our commitment to pursue practices that promoteprotect and respect human rights.


PT-FI’s support costs for the government-provided security totaled $27$25 million in 2018, $232021 and $22 million in 2017both 2020 and $20 million in 2016.2019. This supplemental support consists of various infrastructure and other costs, including food, housing, fuel, travel, vehicle repairs, allowances to cover incidental and administrative costs, and community assistance programs conducted by the military and police.


Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion of security risks in Indonesia.

29
Mining Production


MINING PRODUCTION AND SALES DATA
Years Ended December 31,
ProductionSales
COPPER (millions of recoverable pounds)
202120202019202120202019
(FCX’s net interest in %)        
North America        
Morenci (72%)a
631 707 730  632 711 717 
Bagdad (100%)184 216 218  185 213 218 
Safford (100%)265 161 110  252 150 111 
Sierrita (100%)189 178 160  187 177 157 
Miami (100%)12 17 15  13 16 15 
Chino (100%)124 92 175  114 108 174 
Tyrone (100%)55 45 48  53 45 49 
Other (100%)—  — 
Total North America1,460 1,418 1,457  1,436 1,422 1,442 
South America        
Cerro Verde (53.56%)887 820 1,003 888 825 1,002 
El Abra (51%)160 159 180 167 151 181 
Total South America1,047 979 1,183 1,055 976 1,183 
Indonesia        
Grasberg minerals district (48.76%)b
1,336 809 607 1,316 804 667 
Consolidated3,843 3,206 3,247 3,807 c3,202 c3,292 c
Less noncontrolling interests741 610 668 741 608 679 
Net3,102 2,596 2,579 3,066 2,594 2,613 
Average realized price per pound$4.33 $2.95 $2.73 
GOLD (thousands of recoverable ounces)
        
North America (100%)11 19 11 13 18 
Indonesia (48.76%)b
1,370 848 863 1,349 842 973 
Consolidated1,381 857 882  1,360 855 991 
Less noncontrolling interests257 159 162 252 158 182 
Net1,124 698 720 1,108 697 809 
Average realized price per ounce$1,796 $1,832 $1,415 
MOLYBDENUM (millions of recoverable pounds)
        
Henderson (100%)12 10 12 N/AN/AN/A
Climax (100%)18 14 17 N/AN/AN/A
North America copper mines (100%)a
34 33 32 N/AN/AN/A
Cerro Verde (53.56%)21 19 29 N/AN/AN/A
Consolidated85 76 90 82 80 90 
Less noncontrolling interest10 13 10 13 
Net75 67 77 73 70 77 
Average realized price per pound$15.56 $10.20 $12.61 
a.Amounts are net of Morenci’s joint venture partners’ undivided interest.
b.Our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent through 2022 and Sales Data48.76 percent thereafter (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
c.Consolidated sales volumes exclude purchased copper of 173 million pounds in 2021, 290 million pounds in 2020 and 379 million pounds in 2019.


30


 Years Ended December 31, 
 Production Sales 
COPPER (millions of recoverable pounds)
2018 2017 2016 2018 2017 2016 
(FCX’s net interest in %)            
North America            
Morenci (72%)a
684
 737
 848
 700
 713
 855
 
Bagdad (100%)199
 173
 177
 197
 164
 180
 
Safford (100%)123
 150
 230
 127
 154
 229
 
Sierrita (100%)152
 160
 162
 154
 154
 162
 
Miami (100%)16
 19
 25
 16
 18
 27
 
Chino (100%)173
 215
 308
 176
 217
 308
 
Tyrone (100%)55
 61
 76
 56
 61
 75
 
Other (100%)2
 3
 5
 2
 3
 5
 
Total North America1,404
 1,518
 1,831
 1,428
 1,484
 1,841
 
South America            
Cerro Verde (53.56%)1,049
 1,062
 1,108
 1,051
 1,062
 1,105
 
El Abra (51%)200
 173
 220
 202
 173
 227
 
Total South America1,249
 1,235
 1,328
 1,253
 1,235
 1,332
 
Indonesia            
Grasberg minerals districtb
1,160
 984
 1,063
 1,130
 981
 1,054
 
Consolidated - continuing operations3,813
 3,737
 4,222
c 
3,811
d 
3,700
d 
4,227
c,d 
Less noncontrolling interests695
 670
 722
 694
 670
 723
 
Net3,118
 3,067
 3,500
 3,117
 3,030
 3,504
 
Average realized price per pound (continuing operations)      $2.91
 $2.93
 $2.28
 
GOLD (thousands of recoverable ounces)
            
North America (100%)23
 23
 27
 23
 22
 25
 
Indonesiab
2,416
 1,554
 1,061
 2,366
 1,540
 1,054
 
Consolidated2,439
 1,577
 1,088
 2,389
 1,562
 1,079
 
Less noncontrolling interests228
 145
 99
 223
 144
 99
 
Net2,211
 1,432
 989
 2,166
 1,418
 980
 
Average realized price per ounce      $1,254
 $1,268
 $1,238
 
MOLYBDENUM (millions of recoverable pounds)
            
Henderson (100%)14
 12
 10
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 
Climax (100%)21
 20
 16
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 
North America copper mines (100%)a
32
 33
 33
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 
Cerro Verde (53.56%)28
 27
 21
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 
Consolidated95
 92
 80
 94
 95
 74
 
Less noncontrolling interest13
 13
 9
 13
 12
 6
 
Net82
 79
 71
 81
 83
 68
 
Average realized price per pound      $12.50
 $9.33
 $8.33
 
a.Amounts are net of Morenci’s undivided joint venture partners’ interest; effective May 31, 2016, our undivided interest in Morenci was prospectively reduced from 85 percent to 72 percent (refer to Note 2 for further discussion).
b.Amounts are net of the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest. On December 21, 2018, we completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership, resulting in a reduction of our share ownership in PT-FI from 90.64 percent to 48.76 percent (refer to Note 2 for further discussion). Our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022.
c.Excludes 425 million pounds of copper production and 424 million pounds of copper sales associated with discontinued operations. In November 2016, we completed the sale of our interest in TFHL, through which we held an interest in the Tenke mine (refer to Note 2 for further discussion).
d.
Excludes purchased copper of 356 million pounds in 2018, 273 million pounds in 2017 and 188 million pounds in 2016.

SELECTED OPERATING DATA

 Years Ended December 31, 
 20212020201920182017
CONSOLIDATED MINING 
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production3,843 3,206 3,247 3,813 3,737  
Sales, excluding purchases3,807 3,202 3,292 3,811 3,700  
Average realized price per pound$4.33 $2.95 $2.73 $2.91 $2.93 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)       
Production1,381 857 882 2,439 1,577 
Sales, excluding purchases1,360 855 991 2,389 1,562 
Average realized price per ounce$1,796 $1,832 $1,415 $1,254 $1,268 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production85 76 90 95 92 
Sales, excluding purchases82 80 90 94 95 
Average realized price per pound$15.56 $10.20 $12.61 $12.50 $9.33 
NORTH AMERICA COPPER MINES
Operating Data, Net of Joint Venture Interestsa
       
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production1,460 1,418 1,457 1,404 1,518 
Sales, excluding purchases1,436 1,422 1,442 1,428 1,484 
Average realized price per pound$4.30 $2.82 $2.74 $2.96 $2.85 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production34 33 32 32 33  
100% Operating Data       
Leach operations       
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)665,900 714,300 750,900 681,400 679,000  
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.29 0.27 0.23 0.24 0.28  
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)1,056 1,047 993 951 1,016  
Mill operations       
Ore milled (metric tons per day)269,500 279,700 326,100 301,000 299,500  
Average ore grade (percent):       
Copper0.38 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.39  
Molybdenum0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03  
Copper recovery rate (percent)81.2 84.1 87.0 87.8 86.4  
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)649 647 748 719 788  
SOUTH AMERICA MINING 
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production1,047 979 1,183 1,249 1,235  
Sales1,055 976 1,183 1,253 1,235  
Average realized price per pound$4.34 $3.05 $2.71 $2.87  $2.97  
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)       
Production21 19 29 28 27  
Leach operations       
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)163,900 160,300 205,900 195,200 142,800  
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.32 0.35 0.37 0.33 0.37  
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)256 241 268 287 255  
Mill operations      
Ore milled (metric tons per day)380,300 331,600 b393,100 387,600 360,100 
Average ore grade (percent):      
Copper0.31 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.44 
Molybdenum0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 
Copper recovery rate (percent)87.3 84.3 83.5 84.3 81.2 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)791 738 916 962 980 

a.Amounts are net of Morenci’s joint venture partners’ undivided interest.

b.Cerro Verde mill operations were impacted by COVID-19 restrictions.


Mineral Reserves






31


SELECTED OPERATING DATA (Continued)
 Years Ended December 31, 
 20212020 201920182017
INDONESIA MINING
Operating Data, Net of Rio Tinto Joint Venture Interesta
      
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)      
Production1,336 809 607 1,160 984 
Sales1,316 804 667 1,130 981 
Average realized price per pound$4.34 $3.08  $2.72 $2.89 $3.00 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)      
Production1,370 848 863 2,416 1,554 
Sales1,349 842 973 2,366 1,540 
Average realized price per ounce$1,796 $1,832 $1,416 $1,254 $1,268 
100% Operating Data      
Ore milled (metric tons per day)151,600 87,700 110,100 178,100 140,400 
Average ore grade:      
Copper (percent)1.30 1.32 0.84 0.98 1.01 
Gold (grams per metric ton)1.04 1.10 0.93 1.58 1.15 
Recovery rates (percent):      
Copper89.8 91.9 88.4 91.8 91.6 
Gold77.0 78.1 75.0 84.7 85.0 
Production:      
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)1,336 809 607 1,227 996 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)1,370 848 863 2,697 1,554 
MOLYBDENUM MINES
Molybdenum production (millions of recoverable pounds)30 24 29 35 32 
Ore milled (metric tons per day)21,800 20,700 30,100 27,900 22,500 
Average molybdenum ore grade (percent)0.19 0.17 0.14 0.18 0.20 
a.Prior to December 21, 2018, PT-FI had an unincorporated joint venture with Rio Tinto.

32


MINERAL RESERVES

Our estimates of mineral reserves have been prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of S-K 1300. Proven and probable mineral reserves were determined byfrom the useapplication of relevant modifying factors to geological data, in order to establish an operational, economically viable mine plan. The estimates are based on mapping, drilling, sampling, assaying and evaluation methods generally applied in the mining industry, as more fully discussed below. The term “reserve,”industry. Mineral reserves, as used in the mineral reserve data presented here, means thatthe economically mineable part of a measured or indicated resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. Proven mineral deposit that can bereserves mean the economically and legally extracted or produced at the timemineable part of the reserve determination. The term “proven reserves” means reserves for which (i) quantity is computeda measured mineral resource, from dimensionsgeological evidence revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; (ii) gradeholes with grades and/or quality are computedestimates from the results of detailed, sampling; and (iii) the sites for inspection,closely-spaced sampling, and measurements are spaced so closely andgeologic characterization that defines the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content to a high degree of confidence. Probable mineral reserves are well established. The term “probable reserves” means reservesthe economically mineable part of an indicated mineral resource, for which quantity and grade are computedestimated from information similar to that used for proven reserves butmeasured mineral resources where the sites for samplingsamples are farther apart, or are otherwise less adequately spaced.and the geological characterization is adequate. Probable mineral reserves can also include remaining portions of a measured mineral resource. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven mineral reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.


Our estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves are prepared by and are the responsibility of our employees. These estimates are reviewed and verified regularly by independent experts in mining, geology and reserve determination. Our mineral reserve estimates are based on the latest available geological and geotechnical studies. We conduct ongoing studies of our ore bodies to optimize economic values and to manage risk. We revise our mine plans and estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves as required in accordance with the latest available studies. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with our estimates of proven and probable mineral reserves.


Estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves at December 31, 2018,2021, were determined using $2.50metals price assumptions of $2.50 per pound for copper, in North America and South America and $2.00 per pound for copper in Indonesia, $1,000$1,200 per ounce for gold and $10$10 per pound for molybdenum. Reserves for Indonesia would not significantly change if assessed under a long-term price of $2.50 per pound of copper as PT-FI’s reserve plan is mill-constrained by the term of its IUPK, which contains rights to extend mining rights through 2041.

For the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, LME copper settlement prices averaged $2.65$3.25 per pound, London PM gold prices averaged $1,259$1,654 per ounce and the weekly average price for molybdenum quoted by Metals Week averaged $8.85$11.97 per pound. In late 2015, we incorporated changes in the commercial pricing structure for our molybdenum-based chemical products to enable continuation of chemical-grade production.


The estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves presented in the table below represent the estimated metal quantities from which we expect to be paid after application of estimated metallurgical recovery ratesrecoveries and smelter recovery rates,recoveries, where applicable. Recoverable
 Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves at December 31, 2021
Coppera
(billion pounds)
Gold
(million ounces)
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
North America43.0 0.5 2.69 
South America31.9 — 0.69 
Indonesiab
32.2 26.6 — 
Consolidated basisc,d
107.2 27.1 3.39 
Net equity intereste
76.2 14.2 3.06 
a.Estimated consolidated recoverable copper reserves areinclude 1.8 billion pounds in leach stockpiles and 0.3 billion pounds in mill stockpiles (refer to “Mill and Leach Stockpiles” for further discussion).
b.Estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves from Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that part of a mineral deposit that we estimate can be economically and legally extracted or producedrecovered through 2041. Refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.
c.May not foot because of rounding.
d.Consolidated mineral reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for joint venture partner interests at the timeMorenci mine in North America (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our Morenci joint venture). Excluded from the reserve determination.table above are our estimated recoverable proven and probable silver reserves of 346 million ounces, which were determined using $15 per ounce.
e.Net equity interest mineral reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries). Excluded from the table above are our estimated recoverable proven and probable silver reserves of 230 million ounces. Our net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent for 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.
33
 Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves at December 31, 2018 
 
Coppera
(billion pounds)
 
Gold
(million ounces)
 
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
 
North America49.9
 0.6
 3.06
 
South America33.5
 
 0.72
 
Indonesia36.2
b 
30.2
b 

 
Consolidated basisc
119.6
 30.8
 3.78
 
Net equity interestd
86.8
 17.0
 3.44
 
a.Estimated consolidated recoverable copper reserves include 2.0 billion pounds in leach stockpiles and 0.6 billion pounds in mill stockpiles (refer to “Mill and Leach Stockpiles” for further discussion).
b.Includes 13.0 billion pounds of copper and 10.1 million ounces of gold associated with PT-FI's acquisition of the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest. Preliminary estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves from Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through 2041. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
c.Consolidated reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for joint venture partner interests at the Morenci mine in North America (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our Morenci joint venture). Excluded from the table above are our estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves of 393.1 million ounces of silver, which were determined using $15 per ounce and include 55.7 million ounces associated with PT-FI's acquisition of the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest.
d.Net equity interest reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries). Excluded from the table above are our estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves of 269.3 million ounces of silver. Our net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent from 2019 through 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.



 Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral ReservesEstimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
 at December 31, 2018at December 31, 2021
  Proven Reserves Probable Reserves  Proven Mineral ReservesProbable Mineral Reserves
    Average Ore Grade   Average Ore Grade   Average Ore Grade Average Ore Grade
Processing Million Copper Gold Moly Silver Million Copper Gold Moly Silver  ProcessingMillionCopperGold MolySilverMillionCopperGold MolySilver
Method metric tons % g/t % g/t metric tons % g/t % g/t  Method
metric tonsa
%g/t %g/t
metric tonsa
%g/t %g/t
North America                      North America             
MorenciMill 665
 0.34
 
 0.02
 
 245
 0.32
 
 0.02
 
 MorenciMill784 0.37 — 0.02 — 110 0.35 — 0.02 — 
Crushed leach 446
 0.52
 
 
 
 110
 0.47
 
 
 
  Crushed leach501 0.37 — — — 87 0.35 — — — 
ROM leach 2,222
 0.17
 
 
 
 931
 0.16
 
 
 
  ROM leach2,011 0.14 — — — 424 0.15 — — — 
BagdadMill 1,721
 0.34
 
a 
0.02
 1.43
 625
 0.30
 
a 
0.02
 1.26
 BagdadMill1,928 0.34 — b0.02 1.42 585 0.28 — b0.02 1.17 
ROM leach 13
 0.27
 
 
 
 67
 0.17
 
 
 
  ROM leach19 0.22 — — — 0.20 — — — 
Safford, including Lone StarCrushed leach 665
 0.45
 
 
 
 174
 0.41
 
 
 
 Safford, including Lone StarCrushed leach542 0.46 — — — 143 0.42 — — — 
SierritaMill 2,972
 0.23
 
a 
0.02
 1.36
 397
 0.20
 
a 
0.02
 1.16
 SierritaMill2,241 0.24 — b0.03 1.25 189 0.19 — b0.02 0.99 
Chino, including CobreMill 168
 0.54
 0.05
 0.01
 0.93
 106
 0.54
 0.04
 0.01
 0.92
 Chino, including CobreMill169 0.50 0.04 — 0.89 60 0.48 0.04 — 0.87 
ROM leach 112
 0.29
 
 
 
 9
 0.26
 
 
 
  ROM leach70 0.27 — — — 10 0.25 — — — 
TyroneROM leach 49
 0.26
 
 
 
 6
 0.21
 
 
 
 TyroneROM leach18 0.29 — — — 0.13 — — — 
HendersonMill 58
 
 
 0.18
 
 13
 
 
 0.13
 
 HendersonMill37 — — 0.18 — 17 — — 0.13 — 
ClimaxMill 158
 
 
 0.15
 
 10
 
 
 0.09
 
 ClimaxMill138 — — 0.15 — 13 — — 0.10 — 
  9,249
         2,693
           8,459 1,641 
South America                      South America            
Cerro VerdeMill 830
 0.36
 
 0.01
 1.90
 3,361
 0.36
 
 0.01
 1.89
 Cerro VerdeMill670 0.38 — 0.02 2.00 3,219 0.36 — 0.01 1.92 
Crushed leach 26
 0.40
 
 
 
 37
 0.27
 
 
 
  Crushed leach19 0.43 — — — 0.42 — — — 
ROM leach 18
 0.21
 
 
 
 52
 0.15
 
 
 
  ROM leach33 0.38 — — — 56 0.26 — — — 
El AbraCrushed leach 488
 0.44
 
 
 
 200
 0.40
 
 
 
 El AbraCrushed leach538 0.44 — — — 171 0.39 — — — 
ROM leach 9
 0.17
 
 
 
 8
 0.18
 
 
 
  ROM leach16 0.20 — — — 0.18 — — — 
  1,371
         3,658
           1,276 3,454 
Indonesia                      Indonesia   
Grasberg Block CaveGrasberg Block CaveMill316 1.15 0.76 — 3.61 541 1.01 0.69 — 3.87 
DMLZMill 78
 0.99
 0.83
 
 4.64
 354
 0.91
 0.75
 
 4.36
 DMLZMill91 0.89 0.79 — 4.21 321 0.84 0.71 — 4.03 
Grasberg open pitMill 1
 2.65
 5.70
 
 7.97
 4
 1.08
 1.51
 
 3.12
 
DOZMill 14
 0.54
 0.67
 
 2.29
 37
 0.48
 0.53
 
 2.23
 
Big GossanMill 18
 2.42
 1.03
 
 15.15
 39
 2.24
 1.02
 
 13.50
 Big GossanMill17 2.50 1.02 — 15.56 34 2.14 0.94 — 12.72 
GBCMill 316
 1.11
 0.86
 
 3.86
 647
 0.89
 0.66
 
 3.54
 
Kucing Liarb
Mill 131
 1.31
 1.09
 
 6.60
 218
 1.19
 0.99
 
 5.59
 
Kucing Liarc
Kucing Liarc
Mill88 1.06 0.96 — 5.64 263 1.02 0.89 — 4.98 
  558
         1,299
           512 1,159 
Total FCX - 100% Basis  11,178
         7,650
         Total FCX - 100% Basis 10,247 6,254 
                     
a.Grade rounds to less than 0.01 g/t.
b.Would require additional capital investment, which could be significant, to bring into production.

a.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
b.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
c.PT-FI has commenced long-term mine development activities for the Kucing Liar deposit. See “Mining Operations - Indonesia” for discussion of Kucing Liar capital investments.

The reserve table above and the tables on the following pages utilize the abbreviations described below:
 
g/t - grams per metric ton
Moly - Molybdenum


34


 Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral ReservesEstimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
 at December 31, 2018at December 31, 2021
 (continued)(continued)
 Proven and  Proven and
  Probable Average Ore Grade 
Recoveriesa
 
Probablea
Average Ore Grade
Recoveriesb
Processing Million Copper Gold Moly Silver Copper Gold Moly Silver  ProcessingMillionCopperGold MolySilverCopperGoldMolySilver
Method metric tons % g/t % g/t % % % %  Methodmetric tons%g/t %g/t%%%%
North America                    North America           
MorenciMill 910
 0.33
 
 0.02
 
 79.8
 
 49.4
 
 MorenciMill894 0.37 — 0.02 — 81.6 — 43.3 — 
Crushed leach 556
 0.51
 
 
 
 78.3
 
 
 
  Crushed leach589 0.37 — — — 81.9 — — — 
ROM leach 3,153
 0.16
 
 
 
 42.4
 
 
 
  ROM leach2,435 0.14 — — — 37.4 — — — 
BagdadMill 2,346
 0.33
 
b 
0.02
 1.39
 86.2
 59.1
 70.8
 49.3
 BagdadMill2,513 0.32 — c0.02 1.36 85.8 59.1 81.8 49.3 
ROM leach 80
 0.19
 
 
 
 24.7
 
 
 
  ROM leach21 0.22 — — — 18.3 — — — 
Safford, including Lone StarCrushed leach 839
 0.44
 
 
 
 71.4
 
 
 
 Safford, including Lone StarCrushed leach685 0.45 — — — 72.7 — — — 
SierritaMill 3,369
 0.23
 
b 
0.02
 1.34
 82.1
 60.0
 78.1
 49.3
 SierritaMill2,430 0.23 — c0.02 1.23 80.4 59.1 77.2 49.3 
Chino, including CobreMill 274
 0.54
 0.04
 0.01
 0.93
 80.4
 74.6
 26.0
 75.2
 Chino, including CobreMill228 0.49 0.04 — 0.89 79.1 77.9 — 78.5 
ROM leach 121
 0.29
 
 
 
 44.4
 
 
 
  ROM leach80 0.27 — — — 42.3 — — — 
TyroneROM leach 55
 0.25
 
 
 
 52.5
 
 
 
 TyroneROM leach19 0.28 — — — 57.6 — — — 
HendersonMill 71
 
 
 0.17
 
 
 
 89.9
 
 HendersonMill54 — — 0.16 — — — 87.5 — 
ClimaxMill 168
 
 
 0.15
 
 
 
 89.6
 
 ClimaxMill151 — — 0.15 — — — 88.7 — 
  11,942
                   10,100        
South America                    South America         
Cerro VerdeMill 4,191
 0.36
 
 0.01
 1.89
 86.2
 
 54.2
 44.7
 Cerro VerdeMill3,888 0.37 — 0.01 1.93 85.6 — 54.4 44.9 
Crushed leach 63
 0.33
 
 
 
 81.1
 
 
 
  Crushed leach22 0.43 — — — 76.8 — — — 
ROM leach 70
 0.17
 
 
 
 47.9
 
 
 
  ROM leach89 0.31 — — — 51.4 — — — 
El AbraCrushed leach 688
 0.43
 
 
 
 54.5
 
 
 
 El AbraCrushed leach709 0.43 — — — 54.8 — — — 
ROM leach 17
 0.18
 
 
 
 41.6
 
 
 
  ROM leach22 0.19 — — — 29.5 — — — 
  5,029
                   4,731 
Indonesia                    Indonesia  
Grasberg Block CaveGrasberg Block CaveMill857 1.06 0.71 — 3.78 83.7 63.9 — 55.7 
DMLZMill 432
 0.92
 0.76
 
 4.41
 86.8
 79.2
 
 64.4
 DMLZMill412 0.85 0.73 — 4.07 84.9 78.7 — 64.1 
Grasberg open pitMill 5
 1.26
 1.98
 
 3.66
 91.8
 89.1
 
 43.2
 
DOZMill 51
 0.50
 0.57
 
 2.25
 90.1
 85.3
 
 67.9
 
Big GossanMill 57
 2.30
 1.02
 
 14.02
 91.4
 67.8
 
 63.7
 Big GossanMill51 2.26 0.97 — 13.65 91.3 67.7 — 64.0 
GBCMill 963
 0.96
 0.72
 
 3.64
 84.0
 63.2
 
 55.7
 
Kucing Liarc
Mill 349
 1.24
 1.03
 
 5.97
 85.2
 45.7
 
 40.4
 
Kucing Liard
Kucing Liard
Mill351 1.03 0.91 — 5.15 83.1 52.2 — 39.2 
  1,857
                   1,671 
Total FCX - 100% Basis  18,828
                 Total FCX - 100% Basis 16,501        
a.Recoveries are net of estimated mill and smelter losses.
b.Grade rounds to less than 0.01 g/t.
c.Would require additional capital investment, which could be significant, to bring into production.

a.Amounts may not equal the sum of proven and probable mineral reserves as presented on the previous page because of rounding. In additions, totals may not foot because of rounding.
b.Recoveries are net of estimated mill and smelter losses.
c.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
d.PT-FI has commenced long-term mine development activities for the Kucing Liar deposit. See “Mining Operations - Indonesia” for discussion of Kucing Liar capital investments.
35
Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
at December 31, 2018
(continued)
     Recoverable Reserves
     Copper Gold Moly Silver 
 FCX’s Processing billion million billion million 
 Interest Method lbs. ozs. lbs. ozs. 
North America            
Morenci72% Mill 5.3
 
 0.18
 
 
   Crushed leach 4.9
 
 
 
 
   ROM leach 4.9
 
 
 
 
Bagdad100% Mill 14.6
 0.1
 0.74
 51.5
 
   ROM leach 0.1
 
 
 
 
Safford, including Lone Star100% Crushed leach 5.9
 
 
 
 
Sierrita100% Mill 13.8
 0.2
 1.42
 71.3
 
Chino, including Cobre100% Mill 2.6
 0.3
 0.01
 6.2
 
   ROM leach 0.4
 
 
 
 
Tyrone100% ROM leach 0.2
 
 
 
 
Henderson100% Mill 
 
 0.24
 
 
Climax100% Mill 
 
 0.50
 
 
     52.7
 0.6
 3.09
 129.0
 
Recoverable metal in stockpilesa
   1.6
 
 0.02
 
 
100% operations   54.3
 0.6
 3.11
 129.0
 
Consolidated   49.9
 0.6
 3.06
 129.0
 
Net equity interest   49.9
 0.6
 3.06
 129.0
 
             
South America            
Cerro Verde53.56% Mill 28.4
 
 0.71
 113.7
 
   Crushed leach 0.4
 
 
 
 
   ROM leach 0.1
 
 
 
 
El Abra51% Crushed leach 3.6
 
 
 
 
   ROM leach 
b 

 
 
 
     32.5
 
 0.71
 113.7
 
Recoverable metal in stockpilesa
   1.0
 
 0.01
 1.8
 
100% operations   33.5
 
 0.72
 115.5
 
Consolidated   33.5
 
 0.72
 115.5
 
Net equity interest   17.8
 
 0.38
 61.9
 
             
Indonesia            
DMLZc Mill 7.6
 8.4
 
 39.5
 
Grasberg open pitc Mill 0.1
 0.3
 
 0.3
 
DOZc Mill 0.5
 0.8
 
 2.5
 
Big Gossanc Mill 2.6
 1.3
 
 16.3
 
GBCc Mill 17.2
 14.1
 
 62.8
 
Kucing Liarc Mill 8.1
 5.2
 
 27.0
 
     36.1
 30.1
 
 148.4
 
Recoverable metal in stockpilesa
   0.1
 0.1
 
 0.2
 
100% operations   36.2
 30.2
 
 148.6
 
Consolidated   36.2
 30.2
 
 148.6
 
Net equity interest   19.1
 16.4
 
 78.4
 
            
Total FCX –  100% basis   124.0
 30.8
 3.83
 393.1
 
Total FCX –  Consolidated basisd
   119.6
 30.8
 3.78
 393.1
 
Total FCX –  Net equity intereste
   86.8
 17.0
 3.44
 269.3
 
a.Refer to “Mill and Leach Stockpiles” for additional information.
b.Pounds round to less than 0.1 billion pounds of copper.
c.On December 21, 2018, we completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership, resulting in a reduction of our share ownership in PT-FI from 90.64 percent to 48.76 percent (refer to Note 2 for further discussion).
d.Consolidated reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
e.Net equity interest represents estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries). Our net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent from 2019 through 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.




Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
at December 31, 2021
(continued)
   
Recoverable Mineral Reservesa
   CopperGoldMolySilver
 FCX’sProcessingbillionmillionbillionmillion
 InterestMethodlbs.ozs.lbs.ozs.
North America      
Morenci72%Mill5.9 — 0.15 — 
  Crushed leach3.9 — — — 
  ROM leach2.8 — — — 
Bagdad100%Mill15.4 0.2 0.92 54.2 
  ROM leach— b— — — 
Safford, including Lone Star100%Crushed leach5.0 — — — 
Sierrita100%Mill10.1 0.1 1.02 47.2 
Chino, including Cobre100%Mill2.0 0.3 — 5.1 
  ROM leach0.2 — — — 
Tyrone100%ROM leach0.1 — — — 
Henderson100%Mill— — 0.17 — 
Climax100%Mill— — 0.44 — 
   45.4 0.5 2.71 106.5 
Recoverable metal in stockpilesc
 1.3 — b0.02 0.1 
100% operations 46.7 0.5 2.73 106.6 
Consolidated 43.0 0.5 2.69 106.6 
Net equity interest 43.0 0.5 2.69 106.6 
South America      
Cerro Verde53.56%Mill26.8 — 0.69 108.4 
  Crushed leach0.2 — — — 
  ROM leach0.3 — — — 
El Abra51%Crushed leach3.7 — — — 
  ROM leach— b— — — 
   31.0 — 0.69 108.4 
Recoverable metal in stockpilesc
 0.9 — 0.01 1.2 
100% operations 31.9  0.69 109.6 
Consolidated 31.9  0.69 109.6 
Net equity interest 17.0  0.37 58.7 
Indonesia      
Grasberg Block Cave
48.76%d
Mill16.7 12.6 — 57.9 
DMLZ
48.76%d
Mill6.6 7.6 — 34.5 
Big Gossan
48.76%d
Mill2.3 1.1 — 14.2 
Kucing Liare
48.76%d
Mill6.6 5.3 — 22.8 
100% operations 32.2 26.6  129.5 
Consolidated 32.2 26.6  129.5 
Net equity interest 16.2 13.6  65.1 
Total FCX -  100% basis 110.8 27.1 3.43 345.7 
Total FCX -  Consolidated basisf
 107.2 27.1 3.39 345.7 
Total FCX -  Net equity interestg
 76.2 14.2 3.06 230.5 
a.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
b.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
c.Refer to “Mill and Leach Stockpiles” for additional information.
d.Our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent for 2022 and 48.76 percent thereafter (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
e.PT-FI has commenced long-term mine development activities for the Kucing Liar deposit. See “Mining Operations - Indonesia” for discussion of Kucing Liar capital investments.
f.Consolidated mineral reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
g.Net equity interest mineral reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries). Our net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent for 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.

36


The table below summarizes changes in estimated recoverable copper, gold and molybdenum in mineral reserves between December 31, 2020 and 2021, for our properties identified as material under S-K 1300:
Estimated Recoverable Mineral Reserves on 100% Basis
Copper
(billion lbs.)
Gold
(million ozs.)
Molybdenum
(billion lbs.)
MorenciCerro VerdeGrasberg minerals districtGrasberg minerals districtMorenciCerro Verde
Mineral reserves as of December 31, 202014.3 28.6 33.4 28.3 0.20 0.70 
Production(0.9)(0.9)(1.3)(1.4)(0.01)(0.02)
Adjustmentsa
(0.3)0.2 0.1 (0.3)(0.04)0.01 
Mineral reserves as of December 31, 202113.1 27.9 32.2 26.6 0.15 0.69 
a.The downward adjustments at Morenci are primarily the result of revised mine designs, partly offset by increased crushed leach recovery and re-routing of ore types. The upward adjustments at Cerro Verde are primarily the result of updated resource modeling and revised mine designs, partly offset by mine scheduling strategy and near-term recovery assumptions. The adjustments at Grasberg minerals district are primarily the result of revised mine designs and mine schedule changes.

In defining our open-pit mineral reserves, we apply a “variable cutoff grade” strategy. The objective of this strategy is to maximize the net present value of our operations. We use a “break-even cutoff grade” to define the in-situ mineral reserves for our underground ore bodies. The break-even cutoff grade is defined for a metric ton of ore as that equivalent copper grade, once produced and sold, that generates sufficient revenue to cover all operating and administrative costs associated with our production.


Our copper mines may contain other commercially recoverable metals, such as gold, molybdenum and silver. We value all commercially recoverable metals in terms of a copper equivalent percentage to determine a single cutoff grade. Copper equivalent percentage is used to express the relative value of multi-metal ores in terms of one metal. The calculation expresses the relative value of the ore using estimates of contained metal quantities, metals prices as used for reserve determination, recovery rates, treatment charges and royalties. Our molybdenum properties use a molybdenum cutoff grade.


The table below shows the minimum cutoff grade for mineral reserves by process for each of our existing ore bodies as of December 31, 2018:        2021:        
Copper Equivalent Cutoff Grade (Percent)Molybdenum
Cutoff Grade
(Percent)
MillCrushed
 Leach
ROM
Leach
Mill
North America  
Morenci0.210.140.03
Bagdad0.090.15
Safford, including Lone Star0.17
Sierrita0.17
Chino, including Cobre0.220.06
Tyrone0.05
Henderson0.13
Climax0.05
South America 
Cerro Verde0.150.240.08
El Abra0.150.11
Indonesia 
Grasberg Block Cave0.63
DMLZ0.71
Big Gossan1.70
Kucing Liar0.70
37
 Copper Equivalent Cutoff Grade (Percent) 
Molybdenum
Cutoff Grade
(Percent)
 Mill 
Crushed
 Leach
 
ROM
Leach
 Mill
North America       
Morenci0.17 0.12 0.03 
Bagdad0.15  0.08 
Safford, including Lone Star 0.08  
Sierrita0.15   
Chino, including Cobre0.19  0.05 
Tyrone  0.03 
Henderson   0.12
Climax   0.05
South America       
Cerro Verde0.15 0.12 0.08 
El Abra 0.11 0.06 
Indonesia       
DMLZ0.89   
Grasberg open pit0.25   
DOZ0.89   
Big Gossan1.77   
GBC0.80   
Kucing Liar0.97   

Drill hole spacing data is used by mining professionals, such as geologists and geological engineers, in determining the suitability of data coverage (on a relative basis) in a given deposit type and mining method scenario so as to achieve a given level of confidence in the resource estimate. Drill hole spacing is only one of several criteria necessary to establish resource classification. Drilling programs are typically designed to achieve an optimum sample spacing to support the level of confidence in results that apply to a particular stage of development of a mineral deposit.

The following table sets forth the average drill hole spacing based on average sample distance or drill pattern spacing for proven and probable ore reserves by process type:


  Average Drill Hole Spacing (in Meters)
   Proven Probable
 Mining Unit Mill Leach Mill Leach
North America         
MorenciOpen Pit 86 86 122 122
BagdadOpen Pit 86 86 122 122
Safford, including Lone StarOpen Pit  86  122
SierritaOpen Pit 73  104 
ChinoOpen Pit 43 86 86��122
CobreOpen Pit 61 61 91 91
TyroneOpen Pit  86  86
HendersonBlock Cave 47  96 
ClimaxOpen Pit 61  91 
South America         
Cerro VerdeOpen Pit 55 55 110 110
El AbraOpen Pit  75  120
Indonesia         
DMLZBlock Cave 21  63 
Grasberg open pitOpen Pit 25  51 
DOZBlock Cave 22  55 
Big GossanOpen Stope 12  35 
GBCBlock Cave 28  66 
Kucing LiarBlock Cave 39  96 


Production Sequencing
The following chart illustrates our current plans for sequencing and producing our proven and probable mineral reserves at each of our ore bodies and the years in which we currently expect production from each ore body and related stockpiles. Our proven and probable oremineral reserves in Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through the end of 2041, and our current mine plan and planned operations are based on the assumption that PT-FI will comply with its obligations under the IUPK and receive the second 10-year extension from 2031 through 2041 (refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Note 13 for further discussion). Production volumes are typically lower in the first few years for each ore body as development activities are ongoing and as the mine ramps up to full production and production volumes may also be lower as the mine reaches the end of its life. The sequencing dates shown in the chart below include development activity that results in metal production. The ultimate timing of the start of production from our undeveloped mines is dependent upon a number of factors, including the results of our exploration and development efforts, and may vary from the dates shown below. In addition, weWe develop our mine plans based on maximizing the net present value from the ore bodies. Significant additional capital expenditures will be required at many of these mines in order to achieve the life-of-mine plans reflected below.
prodsequencea01.jpgfcx-20211231_g15.jpg
a.Development commenced in October 2021. The ultimate timing of the start of production is dependent upon a number of factors and may vary from the date shown here.

38


Mill and Leach Stockpiles
Mill and leach stockpiles generally contain lower grade ores that have been extracted from an ore body and are available for metal recovery. Mill stockpiles contain sulfide ores and recovery of metal is through milling, concentrating, smelting and refining or, alternatively, by concentrate leaching. Leach stockpiles contain oxide ores and certain secondary sulfide ores and recovery of metal is through exposure to acidic solutions that dissolve contained copper and deliver it in solution to extraction processing facilities.


Because it is impracticable to determine copper contained in mill and leach stockpiles by physical count, reasonable estimation methods are employed. The quantity of material delivered to mill and leach stockpiles is based on surveyed volumes of mined material and daily production records. Sampling and assaying of blasthole cuttings determine the estimated copper grades of material delivered to mill and leach stockpiles.


Expected copper recovery ratesrecoveries for mill stockpiles are determined by metallurgical testing. The recoverable copper in mill stockpiles, once entered into the production process, can be produced into copper concentrate almost immediately.


Expected copper recovery ratesrecoveries for leach stockpiles are determined using small-scale laboratory tests, small- to large-scale column testing (which simulates the production process), historical trends and other factors, including mineralogy of the ore and rock type. Total copper recovery in leach stockpiles can vary significantly from a low percentage to more than 90 percent depending on several variables, including processing methodology, processing variables, mineralogy and particle size of the rock. For newly placed material on active stockpiles, as much as 80 percent of total copper recovery may be extracted during the first year, and the remaining copper may be recovered over many years. Processes and recovery ratesrecoveries are monitored regularly, and recovery rate estimates are adjusted periodically as additional information becomes available and as related technology changes.


Following are our stockpiles and the estimated recoverable copper contained within those stockpiles as of December 31, 2018:2021:
Recoverable
MillionAverageRecoveries
Coppera
Metric Tonsa
Ore Grade (%) (%)(billion pounds)
Mill stockpiles
Cerro Verde79 0.27 64.5 0.3 
North America copper mines0.45 90.9 — b
84 0.3 
Leach stockpiles
Morenci7,216 0.24 1.1 0.4 
Bagdad505 0.25 0.8 — b
Safford, including Lone Star382 0.42 6.4 0.2 
Sierrita650 0.15 8.6 0.2 
Miami498 0.39 1.0 — b
Chino, including Cobre1,769 0.25 2.7 0.3 
Tyrone1,192 0.28 1.8 0.1 
Cerro Verde566 0.45 4.7 0.3 
El Abra855 0.43 4.6 0.4 
13,633 1.9 
Total FCX - 100% basis2.3 
Total FCX - Consolidated basisc
2.1 
Total FCX - Net equity interestd
1.7 
a.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
b.Rounds to less than 0.1 billion pounds of recoverable copper.
c.Consolidated stockpiles represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
d.Net equity interest represents estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries).

39
       Recoverable
 Million Average Recovery Copper
 Metric Tons Ore Grade (%) Rate (%) (billion pounds)
Mill stockpiles        
Cerro Verde104
 0.27
 74.1
 0.5
 
Grasberg minerals district13
 0.49
 71.6
 0.1
 
 117
     0.6
 
         
Leach stockpiles        
Morenci6,596
 0.24
 1.6
 0.5
 
Bagdad499
 0.25
 0.4
 
a 
Safford, including Lone Star289
 0.43
 8.5
 0.3
 
Sierrita650
 0.15
 9.9
 0.2
 
Miami498
 0.39
 1.5
 0.1
 
Chino, including Cobre1,743
 0.25
 3.7
 0.4
 
Tyrone1,148
 0.28
 2.1
 0.1
 
Cerro Verde488
 0.47
 5.0
 0.2
 
El Abra744
 0.44
 4.5
 0.3
 
 12,655
     2.1
 
         
Total FCX - 100% basis      2.7
 
Total FCX - Consolidated basisb
      2.6
 
Total FCX - Net equity interestc
      2.1
 
         
a.Rounds to less than 0.1 billion pounds of recoverable copper.
b.Consolidated stockpiles represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.
c.Net equity interest represents estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries). Our net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Grasberg minerals district reflects approximately 81 percent from 2019 through 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.



Mineral Resources
Mineralized Material
Our estimates of mineral resources have been prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of S-K 1300. As a result of the SEC’s revised disclosure requirements for mining registrants, we replaced our estimate of mineralized material with an estimate of mineral resources, including measured, indicated and inferred resources in accordance with the disclosure requirements of S-K 1300. We hold various properties containing mineralized materialmineral resources in addition to mineral reserves that we believe could be brought into production should market conditions warrant. However, permitting and significant capital expenditures wouldmay be required before operationsmining of these resources could commence at these properties. Mineralized materialA mineral resource is a mineralized bodyconcentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that has been delineated by appropriately spaced drilling and/or underground sampling to support the reported tonnage and average metal grades.there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Such a deposit cannot qualify as recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves until engineering, legal and economic feasibility are confirmed based upon a comprehensive evaluation of development costs, unitand operating costs, grades, recoveries and other material factors. Mineral resources include measured, indicated and inferred mineral classifications. A measured mineral resource is a resource for which the quantity and grade are estimated from detailed, closely-spaced sampling, and geologic characterization that defines the size, shape, depth and mineral content to a high degree of confidence. An indicated mineral resource is a resource for which quantity and grade are estimated from information similar to that used for measured mineral resources where the samples are farther apart, and the geological characterization is adequate. An inferred mineral resource is a resource for which quantity and grade are estimated from information similar to that used for measured and indicated mineral resources, but with limited geological evidence and sampling. Inferred mineral resource grade and mineralization continuity have a lower degree of confidence. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the estimated mineral resources not included in mineral reserves will become proven and probable mineral reserves. Estimated mineralized materialsmineral resources as presented on the following pagepages were assessed using prices of $3.00$3.00 per pound for copper, $1,200$1,200 per ounce for gold, $12$12 per pound for molybdenum and $20 per ounce for silver. Cutoff grade strategy and expected recoveries used to evaluate mineral resources are consistent with those for mineral reserves but would require additional work to substantiate. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of risks associated with our estimates of mineralized material.

mineral resources.
40
Estimated Mineralized Material
at December 31, 2018
    Milling Material Leaching Material Total Mineralized Material 
    Million         Million   Million 
  FCX’s metric Copper Gold Moly Silver metric Copper metric 
  Interest tons % g/t % g/t tons % tons 
North America                   
Morenci 72% 1,192
 0.28
 
 0.02
 
 1,584
 0.18
 2,776
 
Bagdad 100% 474
 0.32
 
a 
0.02
 1.4
 2
 0.14
 476
 
Safford, including Lone Star 100% 665
 0.52
 0.07
 
 1.4
 792
 0.30
 1,457
 
Sierrita 100% 1,378
 0.17
 
a 
0.02
 1.0
 
 
 1,378
 
Chino, including Cobre 100% 236
 0.41
 0.02
 0.01
 0.7
 24
 0.22
 260
 
Tyrone 100% 
 
 
 
 
 157
 0.23
 157
 
Henderson 100% 103
 
 
 0.14
 
 
 
 103
 
Climax 100% 357
 
 
 0.16
 
 
 
 357
 
Ajo 100% 585
 0.37
 0.06
 0.01
 0.8
 
 
 585
 
Cochise/Bisbee 100% 
 
 
 
 
 306
 0.44
 306
 
Sanchez 100% 
 
 
 
 
 211
 0.28
 211
 
Tohono 100% 279
 0.68
 
 
 
 291
 0.66
 570
 
Twin Buttes 100% 359
 0.46
 
 0.03
 4.9
 144
 0.20
 503
 
Christmas 100% 398
 0.37
 0.05
 
a 
1.0
 
 
 398
 
South America                   
Cerro Verde 53.56% 1,242
 0.35
 
 0.01
 1.8
 17
 0.20
 1,259
 
El Abra 51% 2,124
 0.40
 0.02
 0.01
 1.3
 138
 0.25
 2,262
 
Indonesia                   
Grasberg minerals district 48.76% 2,613
 0.68
 0.60
 
 3.6
 


 2,613
 
Africa                   
Kisanfub
 95% 77
 1.83
 
 
 
 64
 2.39
 141
 
Total FCX - 100% basis   12,082
         3,730
   15,812
 
Total FCX - Consolidated basisc
   11,748
         3,285
   15,033
 
Total FCX - Net equity interestd
   8,788
         3,206
   11,994
 
   
a.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
b.Stated tonnage also includes cobalt (0.95 percent for milling material and 0.97 percent for leaching material).
c.Consolidated basis represents estimated mineralized materials after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.
d.Net equity interest represents estimated consolidated mineralized material further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion of our ownership in subsidiaries.



OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS
Estimated Mineral Resources
at December 31, 2021a
  MeasuredIndicatedInferred
  MillionAverage Ore GradeMillionAverage Ore GradeMillionAverage Ore Grade
 FCX’sProcessingmetricCopperGoldMolySilvermetricCopperGoldMolySilvermetricCopperGoldMolySilver
 InterestMethodtons%g/t%g/ttons%g/t%g/ttons%g/t%g/t
North America       
Morenci72%Milling1,280 0.25 — 0.02 — 1,077 0.27 — 0.02 — 570 0.27 — 0.02 — 
Leaching1,135 0.16 — — — 898 0.16 — — — 522 0.12 — — — 
Bagdad100%Milling492 0.32 — b0.02 1.36 717 0.27 — b0.02 1.13 961 0.17 — b0.01 0.70 
Leaching— b0.22 — — — 0.08 — — — 11 0.08 — — — 
Safford, including Lone Star100%Milling807 0.34 0.02 — 0.45 1,588 0.37 0.02 — 0.44 823 0.29 — b— 0.03 
Leaching556 0.31 — — — 568 0.28 — — — 241 0.26 — — — 
Sierrita100%Milling1,467 0.18 — b0.02 0.74 597 0.17 — b0.02 0.79 131 0.16 — b0.01 0.75 
Chino, including Cobre100%Milling283 0.38 0.04 0.01 0.73 157 0.43 0.04 0.01 0.78 27 0.55 0.05 0.01 0.99 
Leaching27 0.22 — — — 0.28 — — — 0.26 — — — 
Tyrone100%Leaching115 0.22 — — — 29 0.21 — — — 15 0.21 — — — 
Henderson100%Milling75 — — 0.15 — 36 — — 0.12 — — b— — 0.04 — 
Climax100%Milling310 — — 0.17 — 73 — — 0.09 — 18 — — 0.06 — 
Ajo100%Milling470 0.37 0.06 0.01 0.81 159 0.32 0.04 0.01 0.76 31 0.24 0.05 — b0.80 
Cochise/Bisbee100%Leaching153 0.48 — — — 124 0.41 — — — 21 0.37 — — — 
Sanchez100%Leaching86 0.35 — — — 104 0.23 — — — 14 0.18 — — — 
Tohono100%Milling63 0.74 — — — 237 0.64 — — — 27 0.46 — — — 
Leaching45 0.94 — — — 250 0.61 — — — 48 0.49 — — — 
Twin Buttes100%Milling188 0.58 0.01 0.03 6.23 17 0.56 0.01 0.03 5.94 0.67 0.01 0.02 7.27 
Leaching78 0.22 — — — 27 0.20 — — — 11 0.25 — — — 
Christmas100%Milling73 0.52 0.06 — b1.53 291 0.35 0.05 — b0.92 69 0.36 0.06 — b0.94 
South America  
Cerro Verde53.56%Milling22 0.31 — 0.01 1.64 1,460 0.36 — 0.01 1.90 673 0.35 — 0.01 1.87 
Leaching10 0.35 — — — 27 0.29 — — — 13 0.32 — — — 
El Abra51%Milling883 0.45 0.02 0.01 1.52 1,513 0.37 0.02 0.01 1.16 1,012 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.87 
Leaching64 0.24 — — — 72 0.25 — — — 66 0.23 — — — 
Indonesia  
Grasberg minerals district48.76%Milling319 0.78 0.60 — 4.39 2,136 0.76 0.64 — 4.15 154 0.49 0.40 — 2.77 
Total FCX - 100% basisc
 9,001 12,160 5,472 
Total FCX - Consolidated basisd
8,323    11,606  5,166 
Total FCX - Net equity intereste
7,681    9,044  4,240 

a.Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves.
Asb.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
c.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
d.Consolidated basis represents estimated mineral resources after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discusseddiscussion).
e.Net equity interest represents estimated consolidated mineral resources further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).


41


Estimated Mineral Resources
at December 31, 2021a (continued)
  Measured + IndicatedTotal Mineral Resources
  MillionMillionAverage Ore Grade
Contained Metalc
Cutoff Graded
 FCX’sProcessingmetricmetricCopperGoldMolySilverCopperGoldMolySilver
 InterestMethod
tonsb
tonsb
%g/t%g/tbillion lbs.million ozs.billion lbs.million ozs.Grade %
North America    
Morenci72%Milling2,358 2,928 0.26 — 0.02 — 16.8 — 1.11 — 0.14 
Leaching2,033 2,555 0.15 — — — 8.6 — — — 0.02 
Bagdad100%Milling1,209 2,169 0.24 — e0.02 0.99 11.3 0.2 0.85 69.3 0.08 
Leaching12 0.08 — — — — e— — — 0.03 
Safford, including Lone Star100%Milling2,394 3,218 0.34 0.02 — 0.34 24.3 1.6 — 34.7 0.15 
Leaching1,123 1,364 0.29 — — — 8.7 — — — 0.11 
Sierrita100%Milling2,064 2,195 0.18 — e0.02 0.75 8.5 — e0.96 53.0 0.12 
Chino, including Cobre100%Milling440 467 0.41 0.04 0.01 0.76 4.2 0.6 0.10 11.4 0.17 
Leaching31 38 0.23 — — — 0.2 — — — 0.06 
Tyrone100%Leaching143 158 0.22 — — — 0.8 — — — 0.02 
Henderson100%Milling112 112 — — 0.14 — — — 0.35 — 0.10 
Climax100%Milling383 401 — — 0.15 — — — 1.34 — 0.04 
Ajo100%Milling628 659 0.36 0.06 0.01 0.80 5.2 1.2 0.11 16.9 0.14 
Cochise/Bisbee100%Leaching278 299 0.44 — — — 2.9 — — — 0.10 
Sanchez100%Leaching190 204 0.28 — — — 1.2 — — — 0.07 
Tohono100%Milling301 328 0.64 — — — 4.6 — — — 0.15 
Leaching295 343 0.64 — — — 4.8 — — — 0.12 
Twin Buttes100%Milling205 213 0.59 0.01 0.03 6.24 2.7 — e0.15 42.7 0.20 
Leaching105 116 0.22 — — — 0.6 — — — 0.01 
Christmas100%Milling364 433 0.38 0.06 — e1.02 3.6 0.8 0.03 14.2 0.18 
South America  
Cerro Verde53.56%Milling1,482 2,155 0.35 — 0.01 1.88 16.8 — 0.60 130.5 0.14 
Leaching37 50 0.31 — — — 0.3 — — — 0.08 
El Abra51%Milling2,396 3,408 0.37 0.02 0.01 1.17 27.8 1.9 0.62 127.7 0.14 
Leaching137 203 0.24 — — — 1.1 — — — 0.08 
Indonesia  
Grasberg minerals district48.76%Milling2,454 2,608 0.75 0.62 — 4.10 42.8 51.8 — 343.9 0.51 
Total FCX - 100% basisf
 21,161 26,634 197.9 58.1 6.21 844.4 
Total FCX - Consolidated basisg
19,929 25,095  190.8 58.1 5.90 844.4 
Total FCX - Net equity interesth
16,725 20,965  146.8 30.7 5.32 545.0 
a.Mineral resources are exclusive of mineral reserves.
b.Amounts may not equal the sum of measured, indicated and inferred (as presented on the prior page) because of rounding.
c.Estimated recoveries are consistent with those for mineral reserves but would require additional work to substantiate.
d.All sites report a percent equivalent copper grade except for Climax and Henderson, which report a percent molybdenum grade. Cutoff grade is the minimum grade considered for processed material.
e.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
f.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
g.Consolidated basis represent estimated mineral resources after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
h.Net equity interest represent estimated consolidated mineral resources further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion).
42


The table below summarizes changes in Note 2, during the three years endedestimated contained copper, gold and molybdenum in mineral resources between December 31, 2018, we completed2020 and 2021, for our properties identified as material under S-K 1300:
Estimated Contained Mineral Resources at 100% Basis
Copper
(billion lbs.)
Gold
(million ozs.)
Molybdenum
(billion lbs.)
MorenciCerro VerdeGrasberg minerals districtGrasberg minerals districtMorenciCerro Verde
Mineral resources as of December 31, 202023.7 17.5 43.6 54.0 1.06 0.61 
Adjustmentsa
1.7 (0.4)(0.8)(2.2)0.05 (0.01)
Mineral resources as of December 31, 202125.4 17.1 42.8 51.8 1.11 0.60 
a.The upward adjustments at Morenci are primarily the salesresult of substantially alllower estimated unit costs coupled with revised mine designs. The downward adjustments at Cerro Verde are primarily the result of converting material from mineral resources to mineral reserves in the revised mineral reserves mine designs. The downward adjustments at the Grasberg minerals district are primarily the result of revised mine designs and a higher cutoff grade.

Internal Controls over the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Estimation Process
We have internal controls over the mineral reserves and mineral resources estimation processes that result in reasonable and reliable estimates aligned with industry practice and reporting regulations. Annually, qualified persons and other employees review the estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the supporting documentation, and compliance to the internal controls, and, based on their review of such information, recommend approval to use the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates to our oilsenior management. Our controls utilize management systems including but not limited to, formal quality assurance and gas properties. As a result, our portfolioquality control protocols, standardized procedures, workflow processes, supervision and management approval, internal and external reviews and audits, reconciliations, and data security covering record keeping, chain of oilcustody and gas assetsdata storage.

Our systems also cover exploration activities, sample preparation and analysis, data verification, mineral processing, metallurgical testing, recovery estimation, mine design and sequencing, and mineral reserve and resource evaluations, with environmental, social and regulatory considerations. Our quality assurance and control protocols over sampling and assaying of drill hole samples include insertion of blind samples consisting of standards, blanks, and duplicates in the primary sample streams, as well as selective sample validation at December 31, 2018, included natural gas production onshoresecondary laboratories.

These controls and other methods help to validate the reasonableness of the estimates. The effectiveness of the controls are reviewed periodically to address changes in South Louisianaconditions and oil production offshore in California, which had estimated proved developed reservesthe degree of 7.2 million barrelscompliance with policies and procedures. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for discussion of oil equivalents (MMBOE).

Exploration and Development Activities
Capital expendituresrisks associated with oilour estimates of mineral reserves and gas properties totaled $2 million in 2018, and we have no plans to incur significant capital expenditures associated with oil and gas properties in future periods. Capital expenditures for our oil and gas operations totaled $34 million in 2017 and $1.2 billion in 2016 (including $0.6 billion incurred for Gulf of Mexico and $0.5 billion for changes in capital expenditure accruals).mineral resources.

43

Production and Sales Data

Oil and gas sales totaled 3.1 MMBOE in 2018 and 4.6 MMBOE in 2017. Oil and gas production and sales for the year 2016 totaled 47.1 MMBOE, including 34.4 million barrels (MMBbls) of oil, 65.1 billion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.8 MMBbls of natural gas liquids.

Productive Wells
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the total number of active producing oil and gas wells was not significant. At December 31, 2016, we had working interests in 120 gross (94 net) active producing oil wells and 640 gross (100 net) active producing natural gas wells.

Drilling Activities
As of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no exploratory or development wells drilled or in progress. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we drilled 3 gross (2 net) exploratory productive wells and 9 gross (5 net) development productive wells.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.


This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of United States (U.S.) federal securities laws.forward-looking statements in which we discuss our potential future performance. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts, such as plans, projections, or expectations relating to business outlook, strategy, goals or targets; ore grades and milling rates; production and sales volumes; unit net cash costs; capital expenditures; operating costs; operating plans; cash flows; capital expenditures; our expectations regarding our share ofliquidity; PT Freeport Indonesia’s (PT-FI) future cash flows through 2022; PT-FI’s development, financing, construction and completion of a new smelteradditional domestic smelting capacity in Indonesia;Indonesia in accordance with the terms of its special mining license (IUPK); our commitments to deliver responsibly produced copper, including plans to implement and validate all of our operating sites under the Copper Mark, and to comply with other disclosure frameworks; execution of our energy and climate strategies and the underlying assumptions and estimated impacts on our business related thereto; achievement of climate commitments and net zero aspirations; improvements in operating procedures and technology innovations; exploration efforts and results; development and production activities, rates and costs; liquidity;future organic growth opportunities; tax rates; supply ofexport quotas and demand for, and theduties; impact of copper, gold and molybdenum price changes; the impact of deferred intercompany profits on earnings; mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates; final resolution of settlements associated with ongoing legal proceedings; and the ongoing implementation of our financial policy and future returns to shareholders, including dividend payments;payments (base or variable) and share purchases and sales.repurchases.


We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.statements, which speak only as of the date made. We caution readers that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, expected, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that can cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements includeare included below.

Risk Factor Summary
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk and uncertainties. Below is a summary of the following:risk factors that may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial performance, stock price, results of operations, operating flexibility, reputation, costs or liabilities. In addition to this summary and the more detailed description of each risk factor that immediately follows this summary, you should carefully consider the information included in other sections of this annual report on Form 10-K, including but not limited to Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties,” Items 7. and 7A. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” (MD&A) and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” prior to investing in our securities. However, the risk factors described herein are not all of the risks we may face. Other risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may materially affect our business if they occur and the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment. Moreover, new risks emerge from time to time. Further, our business may also be affected by general risks that apply to all companies operating in the United States (U.S.) and globally, which have not been included.


Financial risks

Fluctuations or extended material declines in the market prices of the commodities we produce;
Less flexibility due to our debt and other financial commitments;
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any future public health crisis;
Changes in or failure to comply with financial assurance requirements relating to our mine closure reclamation obligations; and
Unanticipated litigation or negative developments in pending litigation, changes in income tax laws or other contingencies.

International risks
Geopolitical, economic and social uncertainties and risks for our international operations, including in Indonesia, Peru and Chile; and
Failure of PT-FI to meet its commitments to achieve the extension of PT-FI’s IUPK through 2041.


44


Operational risks
Operational risks inherent in mining, including underground mining;
Environmental, safety and engineering challenges and risks associated with management of waste rock and tailings;
Environmental challenges associated with our Indonesia mining operations;
Violence, civil and religious strife, and activism;
Availability of significant quantities of secure water supplies for our mining operations, including future expansions or development projects;
Fluctuations in price and availability of commodities we purchase as well as constraints on supply and logistics, and transportation services; and
Disruptions, damage, failure and implementation and integration risks associated with information technology systems.

Human capital risks
Failure to maintain good relations with our workforce and labor disputes or labor unrest; and
Ability to attract, retain and develop qualified personnel.

Risks related to development projects and mineral reserves
Inherent risks associated with development projects and unique risks associated with development of underground mining;
Ability to replace mineral reserves depleted by production; and
Inherent uncertainty associated with estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources.

Regulatory, environmental and social risks
Compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;
Remediation of properties no longer in operation;
Ability to meet our energy requirements while complying with greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) regulations and other energy transition policy changes;
The physical impacts of climate change on our operations, workforce and supply chain;
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices, performance and disclosures; and
Failure or perceived failure to manage relationships with the communities and/or Indigenous Peoples where we operate or that are near our operations.

Risks related to our common stock
Holding company structure impact on our ability to service debt, declare cash dividends or repurchase shares; and
Impact of anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law.

Financial risks

Fluctuations in the market prices of copper, gold and molybdenumthe commodities we produce have caused and may continue to cause significant volatility in our financial performance and in the trading prices of our debt and common stock. Extended material declines in the market prices of copper, gold and, to a lesser extent, molybdenumsuch commodities could adversely affect our earnings, cash flows and asset values and, if sustained, may adversely affect our ability to repay debt.financial condition.


Our financial results will vary with fluctuations in the market prices of the commodities we produce, primarily copper and gold, and to a lesser extent molybdenum. An extended declineExtended material declines in market prices of thesesuch commodities could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the value of our assets, and/ormay depress the price of our common stock, and may have a material adverse effect on our ability to comply with financial and other covenants in our debt agreements, repay our debt and meet our other fixed obligations;obligations. During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic and may depressresulting negative impact on the tradingglobal economy created significant volatility in the financial markets, including the copper market. Copper prices of our common stockwere initially impacted by economic uncertainty; however, in mid-2020 copper prices began to rise and of our publicly traded debt securities.reached a record high during 2021, despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.



45

Additionally, if market prices for our primary commodities decline for a sustained period of time, we may have to revise our operating plans, including curtailing production, reducing operating costs and capital expenditures and discontinuing certain exploration and development programs. We may be unable to decrease our costs in an amount sufficient to offset reductions in revenues, in which case we may incur losses, and those losses may be material.


Fluctuations in commodities prices are caused by varied and complex factors beyond our control, including global supply and demand balances and inventory levels; global economic and political conditions; international regulatory, trade andand/or tax policies, including national tariffs; commodities investment activity and speculation; interest rates; expectations regarding future inflation rates; the strength of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies; the price and availability of substitute products; and changes in technology. Volatility in global economic growth, particularly in developing economies, has the potential to adversely affect future demand and prices for commodities. Geopolitical uncertainty and protectionism, including the United Kingdom’s plans to exit from the European Union (commonly referred to as Brexit), have the potential to inhibit international trade and negatively impact business confidence, which creates the risk of constraints on our ability to trade in certain markets and has the potential to increase price volatility.


CopperIn addition to the factors discussed above, copper prices may be affected by demand from China, which has becomeis currently the largest consumer of refined copper in the world for infrastructure, the growing markets for automobiles and appliances and by changes inthe global focus on a transition to new technologies for clean energy, to advance communications and to enhance public health, as well as demand for industrial, commercialfrom North America, Europe, and residential products containing copper. Rising trade tensions between the U.S. and China and efforts by the Chinese government to reduce debt levels contributed to a recent slowdown in China’s growth. A continued slowing in China’s economic growth and demand and continued trade tensions between the U.S. and China could result in lower copper prices which could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations, including cash flow. The adoption and expansion of trade restrictions, changes in the state of China-U.S. relations, including the current trade war, orAsian countries other governmental action related to tariffs or trade agreements or policies are difficult to predict and could adversely affect demand for our products, our costs, our customers, our suppliers, and the U.S. economy, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Copper prices have fluctuated historically, with London Metal Exchange (LME) copper settlement prices ranging from $1.96 per pound to $3.29 per pound during the three years ended December 31, 2018. LME copper settlement prices averaged $2.96 per pound in 2018, $2.80 per pound in 2017 and $2.21 per pound in 2016. The LME copper settlement price was $2.71 per pound on December 31, 2018, and $2.79 per pound on January 31, 2019.

Factorsthan China. Additional factors affecting gold prices may include the relative strength of the U.S. dollar to other currencies, inflation and interest rate expectations, purchases and sales of gold by governments and central banks, demand from China and India, two of the worldsworld’s largest consumers of gold, and global demand for jewelry containing gold. The London PMFor additional information regarding the historical fluctuations of the prices of copper, gold price averaged $1,268 per ounceand molybdenum, refer to “Markets” in 2018, $1,257 per ounceMD&A.

If market prices for the primary commodities we produce were to materially decline and remain low for a sustained period of time, we may have to revise our operating plans, including curtailing or modifying our mining and processing operations, as we had to do in 2017early 2020 in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic. We may be unable to decrease our costs in an amount sufficient to offset reductions in revenues, in which case we may incur losses, and $1,250 per ounce in 2016. The London PM gold price was $1,279 per ounce on December 28, 2018 (there was no London PM gold price quote on December 31, 2018), and $1,323 per ounce on January 31, 2019.those losses may be material.

The Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide weekly average price averaged $11.93 per pound in 2018, $8.21 per pound in 2017 and $6.47 per pound in 2016. The Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide weekly average price was $11.88 per pound on December 31, 2018, and $10.95 per pound on January 31, 2019.


Declines in prices of commodities we sell could also result in metals inventory adjustments and impairment charges for our long-lived assets. Refer to Note 4 for additional information regarding metals inventory adjustments recorded for the three years ended December 31, 2021. Other events that could result in impairment of our long-lived assets include, but are not limited to, decreases in estimated proven and probable mineral reserves and any event that might have a material adverse effect on current and future expected mine production costs.


Our debt and other financial commitments may limit our financial and operating flexibility.


At December 31, 2018,2021, our total consolidated debt was $11.1$9.5 billion (see MD&A and Note 8) and our total consolidated cash and cash equivalents was $4.2$8.1 billion. We also have various other financial commitments, including reclamation and environmental obligations, take-or-pay contracts and leases. For further information, refer tosee the risk factor below relating to mine closure and reclamation regulationsregulations. Although we have been successful in repaying debt in the past, refinancing our bank facilities, and pluggingissuing new debt securities in capital markets transactions, there can be no assurance that we can continue to do so. See the risk factor below regarding increasing scrutiny and abandonment obligations relatedevolving expectations from stakeholders, including creditors, with respect to our remaining oilESG practices, performance and gas properties.disclosures. In addition, we or our subsidiaries may incur additional debt in future periods or reduce our holdings of cash and cash equivalents in connection with funding existing operations, capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases or in pursuing other business opportunities.


Our level of indebtedness and other financial commitments could have important consequences to our business, including the following:

Limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the industry in which we operate;

Increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic, industry and industryregulatory conditions;

Limiting our ability to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate requirements and/or material contingencies, to engage in future development activities, or to otherwise realize the value of our assets and opportunities fully because of the need to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to payments on our debt;

Requiring us to sell assets to reduce debt; or

Placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt and/or fewer financial commitments.


46


Any failure to comply with the financial andand/or other covenants in our debt agreements may result in an event of default that would allow the creditors to accelerate maturities of the related debt, which in turn may trigger cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions in other debt agreements. Our available cash and liquidity may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our debt instruments that aremay be accelerated upon an event of default.

From August 2015 through November 2016, we sold 326.5 million shares of our common stock under registered at-the-market equity programs, which generated $3.5 billion in gross proceeds (refer to Note 10). In addition, during 2016, we issued 48.1 million shares of our common stock in connection with the settlement of two drilling rig contracts (refer to Note 13) and 27.7 million shares of our common stock in exchange for $369 million of FCX senior notes (refer to Note 10). Any additional issuance of equity capital to fund operations, reduce debt, improve our financial position or for other purposes, may have a negative impact on our stock price.


As of January 31, 2019,2022, our senior unsecured debt was rated “BB“ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s (S&P), “BB+” with a negative outlook by Fitch Ratings (Fitch), and “Ba2”“Baa3” with a stable outlook by Moody’s Investors Service, (Moody’s). There is“BBB-” with a stable outlook by Fitch Ratings, and “BB+” with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s. If we are unable to maintain our indebtedness and financial ratios at levels acceptable to these credit rating agencies, or should our business prospects deteriorate, our current credit ratings could be downgraded, which could adversely affect the value of our outstanding securities and existing debt, our ability to obtain new financing on favorable terms and could increase our borrowing costs.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any future major public health crisis may have an adverse impact on our business.

Since early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted economic activity and markets throughout the world. The extent and duration of adverse impacts that the COVID-19 pandemic (including new and emerging strains and variants) or any future major public health crisis may have on our operations and business, including demand for the commodities we produce, and on global financial markets remains uncertain. Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if significant portions of our workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions or other restrictions. Despite our efforts to manage the impacts of the pandemic, there can be no assurance that our credit ratingsactions will be effective in containing and mitigating the risk of spread or a major outbreak of COVID-19 (or any future major public health crisis) at our operating sites. Additionally, although several vaccines for COVID-19 have been approved, there are risks that these vaccines will not be downgradedeffective against new and emerging strains and variants of the virus and that these vaccines may not be widely available or accepted in the future.

Certainareas in which we operate. A major outbreak of COVID-19 (or any future major public health crisis) at any of our debt agreements, includingoperating sites, and particularly at PT-FI’s remote operating site, could disrupt or change our revolving credit facility, useoperating plans, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Actions taken by governmental authorities and third parties to contain and mitigate the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) asrisk of spread of COVID-19 (and those that may be taken for any future major public health crisis) have impacted and may in the future negatively impact our business. For example, in mid-March 2020, the Peru government issued a reference rate. In July 2017,Supreme Decree and declaration of a National Emergency in its efforts to contain the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the endoutbreak of 2021. If LIBOR is unavailable after 2021, our debt with interest rates that are indexed to LIBOR will be determined using various alternative methods to the extent provided for in our agreements, which could result in increases in interest rates on such debt. Further, we may need to renegotiate our debt agreements and the loans that utilize LIBOR to replace LIBORCOVID-19. To comply with the new standard that is established by the U.S. Alternative Rate Reference Committee, which is currently expectedgovernment’s requirements, in 2020, we temporarily transitioned our Cerro Verde mine to be the Secured Overnight Bank Financing Rate.

Mine closurecare and reclamation regulations impose substantial costsmaintenance status and adjusted operations to prioritize critical activities. These and other impacts of COVID-19, or any future major public health crisis, had, or could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and include requirements that we provide financial assurance supporting those obligations. We also have plugging and abandonment obligations related to our remaining oil and gas properties, and are required to provide bonds or other forms of financial assurance in connection with those properties.condition.

Changes in or the failure to comply with thesethe requirements of mine closure and reclamation regulations could have a material adverse effect on us.our business.


We are required by U.S. federal and state laws and regulations to provide financial assurance sufficient to allow a third party to implement approved closure and reclamation plans for our mining properties if we are unable to do so. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies may also requireAs of December 31, 2021, our financial assurance obligations totaled $1.5 billion for investigationclosure and remediation actions that are required under settlementsreclamation/restoration costs of enforcement actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) or similar state laws.U.S. mining sites. Refer to Note 12 for additional information regarding our financial assurance obligations.

With respect to our mining operations, mostobligations and Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” for a discussion of our financial assurance obligations are imposed bycertain of such U.S. federal and state laws that vary significantly by jurisdiction, depending on how each state regulates land use and groundwater quality. Although Section 108(b) of CERCLA has required EPAregulations applicable to identify classes of facilities that must establish evidence of financial responsibility since CERCLA was adopted in 1980, currently, there are no financial assurance requirements for

active mining operations under CERCLA. In response to litigation initiated by several environmental organizations against EPA and a subsequent settlement, EPA proposed financial assurance regulations for the hard rock mining industry in January 2017, which were vigorously opposed by us and others in the mining industry. As proposed, the rules would have imposed financial responsibility obligations on U.S. hard rock mining operations that are unnecessary, duplicative of existing state and other federal requirements, and unreasonable. Our initial calculations suggested that the financial responsibility amounts would be difficult, if not impossible, for us and others to meet with corporate resources, and would be extremely expensive, if not impossible, to finance with third-party financial instruments such as letters of credit, bonds or insurance. In December 2017, EPA withdrew its proposed rules and in February 2018, EPA published its final decision that additional financial assurance regulations for the hard rock mining industry would not be needed given the existing state and federal regulatory programs that became effective in March 2018. In May 2018, environmental organizations filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. We and others in the mining industry intervened in the case. If the court remands the rule back to EPA for reconsideration, a re-proposal of rules similar in nature to EPA’s 2017 proposed rules would severely harm the international competitiveness of the U.S. hard rock mining industry and would materially and adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

We are also subject to financial assurance requirements in connection with our remaining oil and gas properties under both state and federal laws, including financial responsibility required under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to cover containment and cleanup costs resulting from an oil spill. In 2016, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) issued revised requirements for lessees operating in federal waters to secure the cost of plugging, abandoning, decommissioning and/or removing wells, platforms and pipelines at the end of production. The revised requirements eliminate previously provided waivers from requirements to post security. In early 2017, the BOEM announced a delay in the implementation of certain aspects of the rules pending further review and in June 2017, BOEM further extended the start date for implementation indefinitely. This extension currently remains in effect. If implemented, the new requirements could require us to post security in the form of bonds or similar assurances. The cost for bonds or other forms of assurances can be substantial, and there is no assurance that they can be obtained in all cases.

As of December 31, 2018, our financial assurance obligations totaled $1.2 billion for closure and reclamation/restoration costs of U.S. mining sites, and $0.5 billion for plugging and abandonment obligations of our remaining oil and gas properties.Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). A substantial portion of our financial assurance obligations are satisfied by FCX and subsidiary guarantees and financial capability demonstrations.guarantees. Our ability to continue to provide guarantees and financial capability demonstrations depends on state and other regulatory requirements, our financial performance and our financial condition. Other forms of assurance, such as letters of credit and surety bonds, are costly to provide and, depending on our financial condition and market conditions, may be difficult or impossible to obtain. Failure to provide the required financial assurance could result in the closure of the affected properties.


Plans and provisions for mine closure and remediation may change over time due to changes in stakeholder expectations, legislation, standards, and technical understanding and techniques, which may cause our provisions for environmental and asset retirement obligations to be underestimated and could materially affect our financial position or results of operations. For example, our implementation of the Global Industry Standard for Tailings Management (the Tailings Standard) (discussed in Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” herein) could require
47


changes to our closure and reclamation plans, although it is uncertain if these changes would result in material capital or operating cost increases. In addition, climate change could lead to changes in the physical risks posed to our operations, which could result in changes in our closure and reclamation plans to address such risks. Any modifications to our closure and reclamation plans that may be required to address physical climate risks may materially increase the costs associated with implementing closure and reclamation at any or all of our active or inactive mine sites and the financial assurance obligations related to the same. Refer to Notes 1 and 12, for further discussion of our environmental and asset retirement obligations.obligations and see the risk factor below relating to the physical impacts of climate change.


Unanticipated litigation or negative developments in pending litigation, changes in income tax laws or with respect to other contingencies could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.


We are, and may in the future become, involved in numerousvarious legal proceedings and subject to other contingencies that have arisen or may arise in the ordinary course of our business or are associated with environmental issues,matters, including those described in Note 12 and in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” involving matters such as remediation, restoration and reclamation of environmental contamination, claims of personal injury or property damage arising from such contamination or from exposure to substances such as lead, arsenic, asbestos, talc and other allegedly toxic substances, disputes over water rights, and disputes with foreign governments or regulatory authorities over royalties, taxes, rights and obligations under concession or other agreements, or other matters.. We are also involved periodically in other reviews, inquiries,investigations and other proceedings initiated by or involving government agencies, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. In addition, fromFrom time to time we are involved in disputes over the allocation of environmental remediation obligations at Superfund“Superfund” and other sites. In addition, we may be held responsible for the costs of addressing contamination at the site of current or former activities or at third party sites, or be held liable to third parties for exposure to hazardous substances should those be identified in the future. The outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain and adverse developments or outcomes can result in significant monetary damages, penalties, other sanctions or injunctive relief against us, limitations on our property rights, or regulatory interpretations that increase our operating costs. Management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of any individual legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although individual or cumulative outcomes could be material to our operating

results for a particular period, depending on the nature and magnitude of the outcome and the operating results for the period.


With respectRegardless of the merit of particular claims, defending against litigation or responding to investigations can be expensive, time-consuming, disruptive to our operations and distracting to management. In recognition of these considerations, we may enter into agreements or other arrangements to settle litigation and resolve such challenges. There can be no assurance such agreements can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur.

Further, we are a global business with operations in various jurisdictions. In the event of a dispute arising at our foreign operations, we may be subject to the asbestos and talc exposure cases describedexclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or arbitral panels, or may not be successful in Note 12, there has been a recent significant increase in the number of cases alleging the presence of asbestos contamination in talc-based personal care products and in cases alleging exposure to talc products that are not alleged to be contaminated with asbestos. In these cases, plaintiffs allege serious health risks and often fatal diseases, including mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, allegedly caused by long-term use of talc-based cosmetic and personal care products. Nationwide trial results in these cases have ranged from outright dismissals to very large jury awards of both compensatory and punitive damages. The primary targets have been the producers of those products, but defendants in many of these cases also include talc miners. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (CAMC), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FCX is one of those targets. One of CAMC’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Cyprus Mines Corporation, was involved in talc mining until 1992 when it exited that business. CAMC has contractual indemnification rights, subject to limited reservations, against the ultimate successorsubjecting foreign persons to the business, which has acknowledged those indemnification obligations and has taken responsibility for all cases tendered to it to date. However, on February 13, 2019, the indemnitor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and CAMC is in the very early stagesjurisdiction of evaluating the potential implications of that filing.

We may be adversely impacted by increased liabilities and costs related toour defined benefit pension plans.

We sponsor two defined benefit pension plans for certain current and former employeecourts or arbitral panels in the U.S. or in enforcing the judgment of a foreign court or arbitral panel against a sovereign nation. Our inability to enforce our right and the enforcement of rights on a few pension plansprejudicial basis by foreign courts or arbitral panels, including against a sovereign nation, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

We have significant net operating losses (NOLs) in the U.S. generated in prior years. These NOLs are available to offset future taxable income, resulting in minimal estimated tax liability in the U.S. over the next several years at current metals market prices. Changes to U.S. income tax laws and/or recommendations from the Organization for non-U.S. locations which provide for specified payments after retirement. The major defined benefit pension plans are funded with trust assets invested inEconomic Co-operation and Development regarding a diversified portfolio of securitiesglobal minimum income tax and other investments. Changeschanges being considered and/or implemented in regulatory requirements or the market value of plan assets, investment returns, interest ratescountries where we operate could materially impact our income tax provision, cash tax liability, and mortality rateseffective tax rate. In addition, these changes may affect the funded status ofresult in new limitations on our definedability to benefit pension plans and cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost, future funding requirements of the plans and the funded status as recorded on the balance sheet. A sustained period of low or insufficient returns could require us to fundfrom our pension plans to a greater extent than anticipated. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion.significant U.S. NOLs.



48


International risks


Our international operations are subject to political,geopolitical, economic and social and regional risks of doing business in countries outside the U.S.risks.


We are a U.S.-based mining company with substantial assets located outside of the U.S. We conduct international mining operations in Indonesia, Peru and Chile and exploration activities in various foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, in addition to the usual risks associated with conducting business in countries outside the U.S., our business may be adversely affected by political, economic, social and regional uncertainties in each of these countries. Risks of conducting business in countries outside the U.S. can include:

Delays in obtaining or renewing, or the inability to obtain, maintain or renew, or the renegotiation, cancellation, revocation or forced modification (including the inherent risk of existingthese actions being taken unilaterally by government owned entities) of contracts, leases, licenses, permits, stability agreements or other agreements and/or approvals;

Expropriation or nationalization of property, protectionism, or restrictions on repatriation of earnings or capital, or other currency controls;capital;

Changes in and differing interpretations of the host country’s laws, regulations and policies (which may be applied retroactively), including, but not limited to, those relating to labor, taxation, royalties, duties, tariffs, divestment, imports, exports (including restrictions on the export of copper concentrates,concentrate and anode slimes, copper and/or gold), trade regulations, immigration, currency and environmental matters (including land use and water use), additional requirements on foreign operations and investment, and/or result in fines, fees and sanctions imposed for failure to comply with the laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which becausewe operate, the risk of any of which may increase with rising “resource nationalism” in countries around the world, may impose increasingly onerous requirements on foreign operationsworld;
Geopolitical, social and investment;

Politicaleconomic instability, bribery, extortion, corruption, civil unrest, blockades, acts of war, guerrilla activities, insurrection and terrorism;

Changes in the aspirations and expectations of local communities in which we operate with respect to our contributions to employee health and safety, infrastructure and community development and other factors that may affect our social license to operate, allterrorism, certain of which leadmay result in, among other things, an inability to increased costs;access our property or transport our commodities, and in particular, our investments and operations in Peru and Chile currently may be susceptible to such risks;

Risk of loss associated with trespass, localillegal artisanal or illegal mining, theft, sabotage and vandalism;

Risk of loss due to major public health issues, including any pandemic (such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic), epidemic or endemic health issues, as a result of the potential related impact to employees, disruptions to operations, supply chain delays, trade restrictions and impact on economic activity in affected countries or regions and due to the limitations of certain local health systems and infrastructure to contain such major public health issues (see above for further discussion of our risks specific to the COVID-19 pandemic);
Changes in U.S. trade, tariff, tax, immigration or other policies that may harm relations with foreign countries or result in retaliatory policies, including the U.S.-China trade war that began in 2018 which, if prolonged, could have a significant adverse effect on global trade and the global economy;policies;

Increases in training and other costs and challenges relating to requirements by governmental entities to employ the nationals of the country in which a particular operation is located;

Foreign exchange controls, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and inflation; and

Reduced protection for intellectual property rights.
The risk of having to submit to the jurisdiction of an international court or arbitration panel or having to enforce the judgment of an international court or arbitration panel against a sovereign nation within its own territory.


Our insurance does not cover most losses caused by the above described risks. For example, we do not have political risk insurance. Accordingly, our exploration, development and production activities outside of the U.S. may be substantially affected by many unpredictable factors beyond our control, some of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.


OurWe are required to comply with a wide range of laws and regulations in the countries where we operate or do business. For example, our international operations must comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws of the other jurisdictions in which we operate. There has been a substantial increase in the global enforcement of these laws in recent years. We operate in certain jurisdictions that have experienced governmentalpublic and private sector corruption and where significant anti-corruption enforcement activities, prosecutions and settlements have occurred. We have a large number of contracts with local and foreign suppliers and contractors, who may take action contrary to some degree,or fail to adopt standards, controls and in certain circumstances, compliance with anti-corruptionprocedures, including health, safety, environment, human rights and anti-bribery lawscommunity standards, that are equivalent to our standards, controls and heightened expectations of enforcement authorities may be in tension with certain local customs and practices.procedures. There can be no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from misinterpretation of or noncompliance with applicable laws and internal policies, recklessness, fraudulent behavior, dishonesty or other inappropriate acts committed by our affiliates, employees, agents, suppliers or contractors. As such, our corporate policies and processes may not prevent or detect all potential breaches of law
49


or other governance practices. Any violation of those lawssuch breaches could result in safety events that may result in injuries or fatalities, significant criminal or civil fines and penalties, litigation or regulatory action or inquiries, shareholder activism (such as to stop using a certain supplier or contractor), civil unrest or other adverse impacts on human rights, and loss of operating licenses or permits, and may damage our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.


We conduct international mining operations in Indonesia, Peru and Chile and exploration activities in other foreign jurisdictions. Accordingly, in addition to the usual risks associated with conducting business in countries outside the U.S., our business may be adversely affected by political, economic, social and regional uncertainties in each of these countries. For example, we are involved in several significant tax proceedings and other tax disputes with IndonesianIndonesia and PeruvianPeru tax authorities (refer to Note 12 for further discussion of these matters). Other risks specific to certain countries in which we operate are discussed in more detail below.


Because our mining operationoperations in Indonesia isare a significant operating asset, our business may be adversely affected by political, economic and social uncertainties in Indonesia.

Our Indonesia mining operations include the Grasberg minerals district, one of the world’s largest copper and gold deposits. These operations are conducted by our subsidiary PT-FI pursuant to a special mining license (IUPK) issued by the Indonesian government on December 21, 2018, which replaced PT-FI’s former Contract of Work (COW) entered into in December 1991. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend its mining rights through 2041, subject to, among other things, PT-FI completing the construction of a new smelter in Indonesia by December 21, 2023, and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the Indonesian government. Refer to Note 13 for a summary of the IUPK’s key fiscal terms.

PT-FI has applied for a one-year extension of its export license, which currently expires on February 16, 2019. Export licenses are valid for one year periods, subject to review and approval by the Indonesian government every six months, depending on smelter construction progress.


Maintaining a good working relationship with the IndonesianIndonesia government and PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero) (PT Inalum, also known as MIND ID), an Indonesia state-owned enterprise and shareholder in PT-FI, is important because of the significance of our Indonesia operations to our business, and because our mining operations there are among Indonesia’s most significant business enterprises. The Grasberg minerals district has been designated by the Indonesian government as one of Indonesia’s vital national assets. Partially because of itsthe Grasberg minerals district’s significance to Indonesia’s economy, the environmentally sensitive area where it is located, and the number of people employed, our Indonesia operations have been the subject of political debates and of criticism in the IndonesianIndonesia press, and have been the target of

protests and occasional violence. Improper management of our working relationship with the IndonesianIndonesia government could lead to a disruption of operations and/or impact our reputation in Indonesia and in the region where we operation,operate, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero) (PT Inalum), a shareholder in PT-FI, is an Indonesian state-owned enterprise. Disputes between us and PT Inalum may result in litigation or arbitration, which could increase our expenses and distract our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business.


The Indonesian mining industry is subject to extensive regulation within Indonesia, and there have been major developments in laws and regulations applicable to mining concession holders, some of which have conflicted with PT-FI’s contractual rights in the past. In particular, the enactment of Law No. 4 of 2009 on Coal and Mineral Mining on January 12, 2009 (the Mining Law) replaced the previous regulatory framework which allowed concession holders, including PT-FI, to conduct mining activities in Indonesia under a contract of work system. The Mining Law, which sets out the regulatory framework for the mining industry in Indonesia, only contains substantive principles and leaves many specific issues to be addressed in implementing regulations, some of which have conflicted with PT-FI’s contractual rights in the past, including, but not limited to, regulations that imposed a progressive export duty on copper concentrate, restricted exports of copper concentrate and anode slimes, increased royalty rates, and required payment of a smelter assurance bond to support a commitment to construct a new smelter in Indonesia (refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the smelter assurance bond). In January 2017, PT-FI suspended exports through April 2017 in response to these Mining Law regulations.

The Mining Law stipulated that previously granted mining rights (through a contract of work) would continue to be valid until expiry, subject to certain adjustments. PT-FI’s former COW was concluded pursuant to the 1967 Foreign Capital Investment Law, which provided basic guarantees of remittance rights and protection against nationalization, a framework for economic incentives and basic rules regarding other rights and obligations of foreign investors. The initial term of PT-FI’s former COW was scheduled to expire in 2021 and explicitly provided that it could be extended for two 10-year periods subject to Indonesian government approval, which could not be withheld or delayed unreasonably. Prior to the issuance of the IUPK to PT-FI in December 2018, PT-FI had been engaged in discussions with the Indonesian government since 2012 regarding various provisions of its former COW, including extending its term. Notwithstanding provisions in PT-FI’s former COWContract of Work (COW) prohibiting it from doing so, the IndonesianIndonesia government sought to modify PT-FI’s former COW to address provisions contained in the Mining Law and implementing regulations adopted thereunder, some of which were not required under or conflicted with PT-FI’s former COW,COW.

In early 2017, the Indonesia government issued new regulations to address exports of unrefined metals, including but not limitedcopper concentrate and anode slimes, and other matters related to (i) restrictionsthe mining sector. PT-FI’s export license for copper concentrate is valid for one year periods, subject to review and approval by the Indonesia government every six months, depending on greenfield smelter development progress. PT-FI’s basic rightexport license expires on March 15, 2022. Refer to MD&A and Note 12 for further discussion of the administrative fine levied by the Indonesia government on PT-FI for failing to achieve physical development progress on the greenfield smelter, and ongoing discussions with the Indonesia government regarding a deferred schedule for the completion of the greenfield smelter in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The 2017 regulations also permit the export mining products; (ii) imposition of additionalanode slimes, which is necessary for PT Smelting (PT-FI’s 39.5-percent-owned copper smelter and refinery located in Gresik, Indonesia) to continue operating. PT Smelting’s export duties; (iii) imposition of excess surface water taxes (referlicense for anode slimes expires on December 9, 2022, subject to Note 12); (iv) imposition of new requirementreview and approval by the Indonesia government every six months. In addition to build additional smelter capacity in Indonesia; (v) unreasonable withholding anda delay in granting approvalthe renewal of two successive ten-year extensionsits export license for anode slimes in 2017, PT Smelting’s operations were shut down from mid-January 2017 until early March 2017 as a result of labor disturbances. Copper concentrate sales to PT Smelting totaled over 10 percent of our consolidated revenues for each of the termyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. We cannot predict when and if PT-FI’s copper concentrate export license and PT Smelting’s anode slimes export license may be renewed. PT-FI’s sale of the former COW;concentrates could be interrupted if either of these export license is not timely renewed or if PT Smelting is unable to operate either due to other operational or financial constraints, which would adversely impact our revenues and (vi) imposition of new divestment requirements.operations.


We cannot assure you that future regulatory changes affecting the mining industry in Indonesia will not be introduced or unexpectedly repealed, or that new interpretations of existing laws and regulations will not be issued, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


In 2019, Indonesia will hold national legislative elections. The presidential election will be held in April 2019, with a run-off in August 2019, if required. Political considerations leading up to these elections could affect the country’s policies pertaining to foreign investment, which could adversely affect our Indonesia mining operations.
50



WePT-FI will not mine all of PT-FI’sthe ore reserves in the Grasberg minerals district before the initial term of PT-FI’sits IUPK expires in 2031 and the2031. PT-FI’s IUPK may not be extended through 2041 if PT-FI fails to abide by theits terms and conditions of the IUPK and applicable laws and regulations.


As discussed in the above risk factor, “Because our mining operation in Indonesia is a significant operating asset, our business may be adversely affected by political, economic and social uncertainties in Indonesia”, onOn December 21, 2018, PT-FI was granted a newan IUPK to replace its former COW, enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend its mining rights through 2041, subject to, among other things, PT-FI completing thePT-FI’s completion of construction of a new smelter inadditional domestic smelting capacity totaling 2 million metric tons of concentrate per year by the end of 2023 (an extension of which has been requested due to COVID-19 mitigation measures subject to the approval of the Indonesia by December 21, 2023,government), and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the IndonesianIndonesia government. Refer to Note 13 for a summary of the IUPK’s key fiscal terms. The expansion of PT Smelting is expected to be complete in late 2023 and the construction of the greenfield smelter is expected to be completed as soon as feasible in 2024, which is subject to, among other things, no additional COVID-19 related disruptions.



The IUPK also requires PT-FI to pay duties on concentrate exports of 5 percent, declining to 2.5 percent when smelter development progress for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia exceeds 30 percent, and eliminated when smelter development progress for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia exceeds 50 percent. SmelterRefer to MD&A and Note 12 for further discussion of the administrative fine levied by the Indonesia government on PT-FI for failing to achieve physical development progress will be determined by an independent verifier appointed byon the Ministrygreenfield smelter, and ongoing discussions with the Indonesia government regarding a deferred schedule for the completion of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) and subject to approval by the MEMR. PT-FI is initiating front-end engineering and design and intends to pursue financing, commercial and potential partner arrangements for this project, which has agreenfield smelter in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

The preliminary estimated capital cost inestimate for the greenfield smelter and related precious metal refinery approximates $3 billion. In July 2021, PT-FI entered into a $1.0 billion, range. The economics of the newfive-year, unsecured bank credit facility to advance its Indonesia smelter will be borne by PT-FI’s shareholders according to their respective long-term share ownership percentages.projects and is currently arranging additional debt financing for these projects. PT-FI’s ability to raise and service significant new sources of capital will be a function of macroeconomic conditions, and future market prices as well as PT-FI’s operational performance, cash flowflows and debt position, among other factors. Financing may not be available when needed or, if available, the terms of such financing may not be favorable to PT-FI. See the risk factor below regarding increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from stakeholders, including creditors, with respect to our ESG practices, performance and disclosures.


Our proven and probable oremineral reserves in Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through the end of 2041, and PT-FI’s current long-term mine plan and planned operations are based on the assumption that PT-FI will abide by the terms and conditions of the IUPK and will be granted the 10-year extension from 2031 through 2041. As a result, wePT-FI will not mine all of these oremineral reserves during the initial term of the IUPK. Prior to the end of 2031, we expect to mine 5348 percent of aggregate proven and probable recoverable oremineral reserves at December 31, 2018,2021, representing 5753 percent of our net equity share of recoverable copper reserves and 6455 percent of our net equity share of recoverable gold reserves.


If PT-FI does not complete the construction of a new smelter inadditional domestic smelting capacity totaling 2 million metric tons of concentrate per year by the end of 2023 (an extension of which has been requested due to COVID-19 mitigation measures subject to the approval of the Indonesia by December 21, 2023,government), or fulfill its defined fiscal obligations to the IndonesianIndonesia government as set forth in the IUPK, the IUPK will likelymay not be extended from 2031 tothrough 2041, and wePT-FI would be unable to mine all of PT-FI’s orethe proven and probable mineral reserves in the Grasberg minerals district, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial position.


Operational risks


Our mining operations are subject to operational risks that could adversely affect our business and our underground mining operations can be particularly dangerous.have higher risks than a surface mine.


We have assets in a variety of geographic locations, all of which exist in and around broader communities and environments. Maintaining the operational integrity and performance of our assets is crucial to protect our people, the environment and communities in which we operate. Our mines are very large in scale and, by their nature are subject to significant operational risks, some of which are outside of our control, and many of which are not covered fully, or in some cases even partially, by insurance. These operational risks, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and cash flow,flows, include earthquakes, rainstorms, floods, wildfires and other natural disasters; environmental hazards, including discharge of metals, concentrates, pollutants or hazardous chemicals; surface or underground fires; equipment failures; accidents;accidents, including in connection with mining
51


equipment, milling equipment or conveyor systems, transportation of chemicals, explosives or other materials and in the transportation of employees and business partners to and from sites (including where these services are provided by third parties such as vehicle and aircraft transport); wall failures and rock slides in our open-pit mines, and structural collapses of our underground mines or tailings impoundments; underground water and ore management; lower than expected ore grades or recovery rates.rates; and seismic activity resulting from unexpected or difficult geological formations or conditions (whether in mineral or gaseous form). As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, workplace entry and travel restrictions may result in the delay of key personnel or external consultants accessing our sites to undertake inspections or other activities, potentially resulting in unidentified asset integrity.


Since late JanuaryFor a discussion of risks specific to our tailings management, see the risk factor below relating to our management of waste rock and tailings.

We are facing continued geotechnical challenges due to the older age of some of our open-pit mines and a trend toward mining deeper pits and more complex deposits. No assurances can be given that unanticipated geotechnical and hydrological conditions may or may not occur, nor whether these conditions may lead to events such as landslides and pit wall failures, in the future or that such events will be detected in advance. Geotechnical instabilities can be difficult to predict and are often affected by risks and hazards outside of our control, such as seismic activity or severe weather, which may lead to floods, mudslides, pit-wall instability, and possibly even slippage of material. In early 2019, our El Abra operation in Chile has experienced heavy rainfall and electrical storms, resulting instorms. As a result, our operating results for 2019 were impacted by a suspension of El Abra’s crushed leach stacking operations since February 4, 2019.for approximately 35 days. We have been unablecannot predict whether similar events will occur in the future or the extent to assess damages becausewhich any such event would affect this, or any of poor road conditions and inaccessible areas and we do not currently know when normal operations will resume. We estimateour other operations.

Our business is dependent upon our workforce being able to safely perform their jobs, including the impact on 2019 production will approximate 8 million pounds of copper through mid-February 2019, and additional impacts of approximately 600 thousand pounds of copper per day are expected until normal operations resume.

potential for physical injuries or illness. Underground mining operations can be particularly dangerous, and in May 2013, a tragic accident, which resulted in 28 fatalities and 10 injuries, occurred at PT-FIthe Grasberg minerals district when the rock structure above the ceiling of an underground training facility collapsed. PT-FI temporarily suspended mining and processing activities at the Grasberg complex to conduct inspections and resumed open-pit mining and concentrating activities in June 2013, and underground operations in July 2013. No assurance can be given that similar events will not occur in the future.


We experience mining induced seismic activity from time to time in the Grasberg minerals district. We cannot predict whether additional occurrences of seismic activity or other unexpected geological activity will occur that could cause schedule delays or additional revisions to PT-FI’s mine plans, which could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition to the usual risks encountered in the mining industry, our Indonesia mining operations involve additional
risks given that such operations are locatedtheir location in steep mountainous terrain in a remote area of Indonesia. These
conditions have required us to overcome special engineering difficulties and develop extensive infrastructure facilities. The area also receives considerableextreme rainfall, which has led to periodic floods and mudslides. Further, the
mine site is also in an active seismic area and has experienced earth tremors from time to time. Our

We maintain insurance at amounts we believe to be reasonable to cover some of these risks and hazards; however, our insurance may
not sufficiently cover an unexpectedlosses from certain natural or operating disaster.disasters. No assurance can be given that such insurance will continue to be available, or that it will be available at economically feasible premiums, or that we will be able to obtain or maintain such insurance. We may elect to not purchase insurance for certain risks due to the high premium costs associated with insuring such risk or for various other reasons. We do not have coverage for certain environmental losses and other risks. The lack of, or insufficiency of, insurance coverage could adversely affect our cash flows and overall profitability.


The occurrence of one or more of these events in connection with our exploration activities and development of and production from mining operations may result in the death of, or personal injury to, our employees, other personnel or third parties, the loss of mining equipment, damage to or destruction of mineral properties or production facilities, significant repair costs, monetary losses, deferral or unanticipated fluctuations in production, extensive community disruption (including short- and long-term health and safety risks), loss of licenses, permits or necessary approvals to operate, loss of workforce confidence, loss of infrastructure and services, disruption to essential supplies or delivery of our products, environmental damage and potential legal liabilities, all of which may adversely affect our reputation, business, prospects, results of operations and financial position. Further, the impacts of any serious incidents that occur may also be amplified if we fail to respond timely or in an appropriate manner.

52


Our management of waste rock and tailings are subject to significant environmental, safety and engineering challenges and risks that could adversely affect our business.

The waste rock (including overburden) and tailings produced in our mining operations represent our largest volume of waste material. Managing the volume of waste rock and tailings presents significant environmental, safety and

engineering challenges and risks primarily relating to structural stability, geochemistry, water quality and dust generation. Management of this waste is regulated in the jurisdictions where we operate and our programs are designed to be in compliancecomply with applicable national, state and local laws, permits and approved environmental impact studies.

We maintain large leach pads and tailings impoundments containing viscous material, which are effectivelymaterial. Tailings impoundments include large damsembankments that must be engineered, constructed and monitored to ensure structural stability and avoid leakages or structural collapse. Our tailings impoundments in arid areas must have effective programs to suppress fugitive dust emissions, and we must effectively monitor, prevent and treat acid rock drainage at all of our operations. In Indonesia, we use a river transport system for tailings management, which presents other risks as discussed below.in more detail in the risk factor below relating to the environmental challenges at our Indonesia mining operations.


WeSubsidiaries of our company currently operate 1916 active tailings storage facilities (14 in the U.S. and 2 in Peru), of which 11 have an upstream design and 5 have a centerline design. We also manage 5552 tailings storage facilities in the U.S. that are inactive or have been reclaimed (approximately two-thirdsclosed (45 with an upstream design, 5 with a centerline design and 2 with a downstream design) and another 5 with an upstream design that are deemed “safely closed” according to the definition in the Tailings Standard. In 2021, we produced approximately 295 million metric tons of these have been reclaimed).tailings. The failure of tailings and other impoundmentsembankments at any of our mining operations could cause severe, and in some cases catastrophic, property and environmental damage and loss of life, as well as adverse effects on our business and reputation. Many of our tailings storage facilities are located in areas where a failure has the potential to impact individual dwellings and a limited number of impoundments are in areas where a failure has the potential to impact nearby communities or mining infrastructure. As a result, our programs take into account the significant consequences resulting from potential failure modes, and we apply significantdedicate substantial financial resources and both internal and external technical resources to pursue the safe management of all those facilities. The importancefacilities reducing and in some cases eliminating the number of careful design, management and monitoringpotential consequences of large impoundments has been emphasized in recent years, including as recently as January 2019, by large scale tailings dam failures at unaffiliated mines, which resulted in numerous fatalities and caused extensive property and environmental damage.credible failure modes. Our tailings management and stewardship program which involves qualified external Engineers of Record and periodic oversight by independent External Tailingstailings Technical Review Boards at numerous operations, complies with the tailings governance framework on preventing catastrophic failure of tailings storage facilities adopted in December 2016 by the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) and required to be implemented by ICMM members.our Tailings Stewardship Team. We continue to enhance our existing practices and work with ICMM members on additional initiatives to strengthen critical controls for the design, operation and closure of tailings storage facilities in an effort to reduce the risk of severe or catastrophic failure of tailings storage facilities butthose facilities. However, no assurance can be given that these events will not occur in the future. For additional information regarding the company’s tailings management and stewardship program, including the Tailings Standard, refer to Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” herein.


Labor unrest, violence,In addition, changes to the physical risks to our facilities resulting from climate change could lead to changes in our plans for managing tailings and waste rock in order to address such risks, which may materially increase the costs associated with managing waste rock and tailings at any or all of our active or inactive mine sites. For further discussion, see the below risk factor relating to the physical effects of climate change.

Based on observations from tailings failures at unaffiliated mines, in addition to fatalities and severe personal, property and environmental damages, these events could result in limited or restricted access to mine sites, suspension of operations, decrease in mineral reserves, legal liability, government investigations, additional regulations and restrictions on mining operations in response to any such failure, increased monitoring costs and production costs, increased insurance costs or inability to obtain insurance, increased costs and/or limited access to capital, remediation costs, inability to comply with any additional safety requirements or obtain necessary certifications, evacuation or relocation of communities or other emergency action, and other impacts, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial position.

Our Indonesia mining operations have the potential to create difficult and costly environmental challenges, and future changes in Indonesia environmental laws could increase our costs.

Mining operations on the scale of our Indonesia operations involve significant environmental risks and challenges. Our primary challenge is to dispose of the large amount of tailings. In 2021, PT-FI produced approximately 52 million metric tons of tailings. Our tailings management plan, which has been approved by the Indonesia government, uses the unnavigable river system in the highlands near our mine to transport the tailings to an
53


engineered deposition area in the lowlands. Lateral levees have been constructed to help contain the footprint of the tailings and to limit their impact in the lowlands.

Another major environmental challenge at PT-FI is managing overburden, which is rock that was required to be moved aside in the open pit mining process to reach the ore in the Grasberg open pit. In the presence of air, water and naturally occurring bacteria, some overburden can generate acid rock drainage, or acidic water containing dissolved metals that, if not properly managed, can adversely affect the environment. In addition, specific overburden stockpiles are subject to erosion caused by the large amounts of rainfall, with the eroded stockpile material eventually being deposited in the lowlands tailings management area. The Grasberg overburden stockpiles have experienced erosion over time. This overburden affects the volume as well as the physical and chemical characteristics of the sediment material deposited in the lowlands tailings management area, which can result in environmental impacts. PT-FI’s current designated tailings deposition management plan as well as robust environmental monitoring programs take into account the presence of this overburden in the lowlands tailings management area.

As part of its ongoing management and monitoring program, PT-FI expanded the scope of its analyses to assess possible impacts to the environment and human health from overburden erosion and tailings, including conducting and updating a human health risk assessment. During 2021, PT-FI continued to advance work on the human health risk assessment to evaluate these potential impacts. A study conducted by third-party expert consultants with PT-FI support, assessed potential exposure pathways including surface waters, groundwaters, sediments and soils, dust and terrestrial and aquatic tissues. PT-FI continues further study and evaluation and, in furtherance of this effort, has been assisting local health authorities with a community health survey, which is providing further data to evaluate any potential impacts from operations and information on community health conditions. The ongoing study and evaluation, which is expected to be completed in the first half of 2022, will assist in determining what additional monitoring and mitigation efforts may be required in the future.

In the past, the Indonesia government has raised questions with respect to our tailings and overburden management plans, including a suggestion that we implement a pipeline system rather than the river transport system for tailings management. Our Indonesia mining operations are remotely located in steep mountainous terrain and in an active seismic area; such that, a pipeline system would be difficult to construct and maintain, and more prone to catastrophic failure, and could therefore involve significant potentially adverse environmental issues. Based on our own studies and others conducted by third parties, we do not believe that a pipeline system for all mine tailings is feasible.

Overtopping or levee failure induced by extreme weather events is a potential risk. Additionally, unanticipated structural failure of the levee system in the future could result in flooding of the nearby communities and related loss of lives and/or severe personal, property and environmental damages. This may necessitate evacuation or relocation of communities or other emergency action, financial assistance to the communities impacted, and remediation costs to repair and compensate for the social, cultural and economic impacts.

Managing these environmental challenges at our Indonesia operations could result in reputational harm and increased costs that could be significant.

In December 2018, Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MOEF) issued a revised environmental permit to PT-FI to address many of the operational activities that it alleged were inconsistent with earlier studies. PT-FI and the MOEF also established a new framework for continuous improvement in environmental practices at PT-FI’s operations, including initiatives that will examine options to potentially increase tailings retention and to evaluate large scale beneficial uses of tailings within Indonesia. LAPI-ITB, the third-party expert nominated by MOEF to perform the framework evaluation, submitted their report to the MOEF in June 2021. PT-FI is currently evaluating additional actions and activities based on the study conclusions. In addition, MOEF finalized environmental permitting related to the underground rail facilities and Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) production of 80 thousand metric tons per day in November 2021. Permitting of certain facilities for underground mining production operations, as well as permitting for the extension of levees to contain the lateral flow of tailings in the lowlands, continues to progress.

We cannot assure you that future environmental changes affecting the mining industry in Indonesia will not be introduced or unexpectedly altered or repealed, or that new interpretations of existing Indonesia environmental laws and regulations will not be issued, which could have a significant impact on PT-FI.

54


Violence, civil and religious strife, and activism could result in loss of life and disrupt our operations.

Indonesia has long faced separatist movements and civil and religious strife in a number of provinces. Several separatist groups have sought increased political independence for the province of Papua, where our Grasberg minerals district is located. In Papua, there have been sporadic attacks on civilians by separatists and sporadic but highly publicized conflicts between separatists and the Indonesia military and police. In addition, illegal miners have periodically clashed with police who have attempted for years to move them away from our facilities. Social, economic and political instability in Papua could disrupt our operationsmaterially and may adversely affect us if it results in damage to our business, financial condition,property or interruption of our Indonesia operations.

Starting in 2009, a series of shooting incidents occurred within the PT-FI project area, including along the road leading to our mining and milling operations. Since 2009, there have been 22 fatalities and more than 75 injuries to our employees, contractor employees, government security personnel and civilians. Shooting incidents in PT-FI’s project area have continued on a sporadic basis through January 2021, when a helicopter contracted to PT-FI was fired upon and struck by a single gunshot in an area adjacent to the project area. There were several shooting incidents in the first half of 2020, including an incident near a PT-FI office building where one employee was killed and two others injured. In addition, in December 2018, a mass shooting incident targeting a highway construction crew occurred in a remote mountain area approximately 100 miles east of the PT-FI project area, resulting in at least 19 fatalities and several were reported as missing. Separatist security incidents, including shootings, continue to occur regionally. PT-FI actively monitors security conditions and the occurrence of incidents in the region.

The safety of our workforce is a critical concern, and PT-FI continues to work with the Indonesia government to enhance security and address security issues within the PT-FI project area and in nearby areas. Although we have implemented measures and safeguards consistent with both international standards and our own internal standards relating to the use of force and respect for human rights, the implementation of these measures and safeguards does not guarantee that personnel, national police or other security forces will uphold these standards in every instance. We continue to limit the use of the road leading to PT-FI’s mining and milling operations to secured convoys, including transport of personnel by armored vehicles in designated areas.

We cannot predict whether additional incidents will occur that could result in loss of life, disruption or suspension of PT-FI’s operations. If other disruptive incidents occur, they could adversely affect our results of operations and prospects.financial condition in ways that we cannot predict at this time.


South America countries have historically experienced uneven periods of economic growth, as well as recession, periods of high inflation and general economic and political instability. Since 2019, both Peru and Chile have experienced significant civil unrest unrelated to our operations. For example, in fourth-quarter 2021, an unaffiliated copper producer in southern Peru announced the suspension of its operations after repeated and sustained community protests on the government-designated concentrate transport route along public roads, which constrained the operation from shipping its product. Although such civil unrest has not significantly impacted our results, similar events in the future could cause our South America operations to be materially impacted, in which case, we may not be able to meet our production and sales targets. We cannot predict whether similar or more significant incidents of civil unrest will occur in the future in Peru or Chile.

Our mining operations, including future expansions or developments, depend on the availability of significant quantities of secure water supplies.

We recognize that access to clean, safe and reliable water supplies is vital to the health and livelihood of our host communities. Our mining operations require physical availability and secure legal rights to significant quantities of water, and the increasing pressure on water resources requires us to consider both current and future conditions in our approach. We aim to balance our operational water requirements with those of the local communities, environment and ecosystems. Most of our North America and South America mining operations are in areas where competition for water supplies is significant, and where climate change may lead to increasing scarcity of water resources in the future. Continuous production at our mines and any future expansions or developments are dependent on many factors, including our ability to maintain our water rights and claims, and the continuing physical availability of the water supplies. Current and long-term water risks include those that arise from our operations (such as failure to properly manage tailings and overburden) and events that we do not control (such as extreme weather and other physical risks associated with climate change). For further discussion of the physical impacts of climate change, see the related risk factor below.

55


As discussed in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings,” in Arizona, where our operations use both surface water and groundwater, we are a participant in an active adjudication in which Arizona courts have been attempting, for over 45 years, to quantify and prioritize surface water claims for the Gila River watershed, one of the state’s largest river systems. If we are not able to satisfactorily resolve the issues being addressed in the adjudications, water uses could be diminished or curtailed, and our operations at Morenci, Safford and Sierrita could be adversely affected unless we are able to acquire alternative resources.

Water for our Cerro Verde operation in Peru comes from renewable sources through a series of storage reservoirs on the Rio Chili watershed that collects water primarily from seasonal precipitation and from wastewater collected from the city of Arequipa and treated at a wastewater treatment plant constructed by us. As a result of occasional drought conditions, temporary supply shortages that could affect our Cerro Verde operations are possible.

Water for our El Abra mining operation in Chile comes from the continued pumping of groundwater from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer. In 2010, El Abra obtained regulatory approval for the continued pumping of groundwater from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer for its sulfide processing plant, which began operations in 2011. Our current permit will expire in 2029 unless we are able to renew it again. The agreement to pump from this aquifer is subject to continued monitoring of the aquifer water levels and select flora species to ensure that environmentally sensitive areas are not impacted by our pumping. If impact occurs, reductions in pumping are required to restore water levels, which could have an adverse effect on production from El Abra. For further discussion, see the risk factor above relating to the geopolitical, economic and social risks associated with our international operations.

Although we typically have sufficient water for our Indonesia operations, the area receives considerable rainfall that makes us susceptible to periodic floods and mudslides, the nature and magnitude of which cannot be predicted.

Although each of our mining operations currently has access to sufficient water supplies to support current operational demands, as discussed above, the availability of additional supplies for potential future expansions or development will require additional investments and will take time to develop, if available. While we are taking actions to acquire additional back-up water supplies, such supplies may not be available at acceptable cost, or at all, so that the loss of a water right or currently available water supply could force us to curtail operations or force premature closures, and the ability to obtain future water supplies could prevent future expansions or developments, thereby increasing and/or accelerating costs or foregoing profitable operations.

Fluctuations in the price and availability of commodities we purchase and constraints on supply and logistics could affect our profitability. Further, significant delays or increases in costs affecting transportation services may affect our business.

Prices and availability of commodities consumed or used in our operations such as natural gas, diesel, ammonium nitrate, chemical reagents, and steel-related products can affect the costs of production at our operations. These prices fluctuate and can be volatile and any cost increases could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In 2021, we experienced price increases on certain commodities, including fuel, steel, ammonia and acid. While these increases did not significantly impact our results in 2021, additional increases may occur in 2022 and such increases may be material.

Ensuring continuity of supply of materials to our operations is critical to our business. We also rely on the availability of components from suppliers for key machines and equipment, which may be impacted by competition demands as well as the availability of input materials in the creation of such equipment. A supplier’s failure to supply materials or components in a timely manner or to meet our quality, quantity, cost requirements or our technical specifications, or our inability to obtain alternative sources of materials or components on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, could adversely affect our operations. In 2021, we experienced longer lead times on delivery of certain materials and shortages on certain materials, including lubricants, semi-conductors, personal protective equipment, rubber and acid. While these delays and shortages did not significantly impact our results in 2021, these issues may continue in 2022 and such shortages and delays may be material.

Our business depends on the inbound transportation of commodities we use and the outbound transportation of the commodities we produce by truck, rail and ocean freight. The COVID-19 pandemic has created global shipping and logistics challenges. Any significant increase in the cost of the transportation of these commodities or products, as a result of increases in fuel or labor costs, higher demand for logistics services, or otherwise, would adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if the transportation service providers fail to deliver commodities used in our operations to us or the commodities we produce to our customers in a timely manner or at all, such failure could
56


adversely impact our ability to meet our production schedules, delay our projects and capital initiatives, negatively affect our customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Our information technology systems may be adversely affected by disruptions, damage, failure and risks associated with implementation and integration.

Our industry has become increasingly supported by and dependent on digital technologies. Our strategy of operating large, long-lived, geographically diverse assets has been increasingly dependent on our ability to become fully integrated and highly automated. Many of our business and operational processes are heavily dependent on traditional and emerging technology systems to conduct day-to-day operations, improve safety and efficiency, and lower costs.

As our dependence on information systems, including those of our third-party service providers and vendors, grows, we become more vulnerable to an increasing threat of continually evolving cybersecurity risks. In recent years, cybersecurity events have increased in frequency and magnitude. These incidents may include, but are not limited to, installation of malicious software, phishing, ransomware, credential attacks, unauthorized access to data and other advanced and sophisticated cybersecurity breaches and threats, including threats that increasingly target critical operational technologies and process control networks. If any of these threats materialize, we could be subject to manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks, production downtimes, communication interruption or other disruptions and delays to our operations or to the transportation of products or infrastructure utilized by our operations, unauthorized release of proprietary, commercially sensitive, confidential or otherwise protected information, a misappropriation or loss of funds, the corruption of data, significant health and safety consequences, environmental damage, loss of intellectual property, fines and litigation, damage to our reputation or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. We have experienced targeted and non-targeted cybersecurity events in the past and may experience them in the future. While these cybersecurity events did not result in any material loss to us or interrupt our day-to-day operations, as of January 31, 2022, there can be no assurance that we will not experience any such losses or interruption in the future. Given the unpredictability of the timing and the evolving nature and scope of information technology disruptions, the various procedures and controls we use to monitor and protect against these threats and to mitigate our potential risks to such threats may not be sufficient in preventing cybersecurity events from materializing. Further, as cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities to cybersecurity threats.

We could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into our operations. System modification failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations and could, if not successfully implemented, adversely impact the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.

Human capital risks

Labor disputes or labor unrest could disrupt our operations.

Our business is dependent on maintaining good relations with our workforce. A significant portion of our employees are represented by labor unions in a number of countries under various collective bargaining agreements with varying durations and expiration dates. Refer to Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” of this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding labor matters, and expiration dates of such agreements. As of December 31, 2018,2021, approximately 3731 percent of our global labor force was covered by collective bargaining agreements and approximately 2114 percent of our global labor force was covered by agreements that have expired and are currently being negotiatedwill or willwere scheduled to expire during 2019.2022.


Labor agreements are negotiated on a periodic basis, and may not be renewed on reasonably satisfactory terms to us or at all. If we do not successfully negotiate new collective bargaining agreements with our union workers, we may incur prolonged strikes and other work stoppages at our mining operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, if we enter into a new labor agreement with any union that significantly increases our labor costs relative to our competitors, our ability to compete may be materially and adversely affected. Refer to Items 1. and 2., “Business and Properties,” for additional information regarding labor matters, and expiration dates of such agreements.

57


We could also experience labor disruptions such as work stoppages, work slowdowns, union organizing campaigns, strikes, or lockouts that could adversely affect our operations. For example, during third-quarter 2016, PT-FI experienced labor productivity issues and a 10-day work stoppage, that began in late September 2016. These labor productivity issueswhich continued during fourth-quarter 2016 and into the first half of 2017. Beginning in mid-April 2017, PT-FI experienced a high level of worker absenteeism, which unfavorably impacted mining and milling rates. Arates, and in May 2017, a significant number of employees and contractors elected to participate in an illegal strike action beginning in May 2017, andaction. These employees were subsequently deemed to have voluntarily resigned under existing IndonesianIndonesia laws and regulations resulting in increased costs associated with employee severance. In third-quarter 2020, we experienced a five-day labor-related work stoppage related to COVID-19 travel restrictions when a small group of workers at PT-FI staged protests and a blockade restricting access to the main road to the mining operations area. We reached an amicable resolution with the group of workers while upholding our COVID-19 safety protocols. There were no strikes or lockouts at any of our operations in 2021.

We cannot predict whether additional labor disruptions will occur. Significant reductions in productivity or protracted work stoppages at one or more of our operations could significantly reduce our production and sales volumes or disrupt operations, which could adversely affect our cash flow,flows, results of operations and financial condition.

Indonesia has long faced separatist movements and civil and religious strife in a number of provinces. Several separatist groups have sought increased political independence for the province of Papua, where our Grasberg minerals district is located. In Papua, there have been sporadic attacks on civilians by separatists and sporadic but highly publicized conflicts between separatists and the Indonesian military and police. In addition, illegal miners have periodically clashed with police who have attempted for years to move them away from our facilities. Social,

economic and political instability in Papua could materially and adversely affect us if it results in damage to our property or interruption of our Indonesia operations.

In 2009, a series of shooting incidents occurred within the PT-FI project area, including along the road leading to our mining and milling operations. The shooting incidents continued on a sporadic basis through January 2015. During this time, there were 20 fatalities and more than 50 injuries to our employees, contractor employees, government security personnel and civilians. The next shooting incident occurred in August 2017, and a series of shooting incidents continued on a sporadic basis within the PT-FI project area and in nearby areas through August 2018, resulting in two fatalities and 25 injuries. In December 2018, a mass shooting incident targeting a highway construction crew occurred in a remote mountain area approximately 100 miles east of the PT-FI project area, resulting in at least 19 fatalities and several reported as missing. PT-FI continues to monitor the situation in the region.

The safety of our workforce is a critical concern, and PT-FI continues to work with the Indonesian government to address security issues within the PT-FI project area and in nearby areas. We continue to limit the use of the road leading to our mining and milling operations to secured convoys, including transport of personnel by armored vehicles in designated areas.

We cannot predict whether additional incidents will occur that could disrupt or suspend our operations. If other disruptive incidents occur, they could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition in ways that we cannot predict at this time.


Our mining operations dependfuture success depends on the availability of significant quantities of secure water supplies.our ability to attract, retain and develop qualified personnel.


Our mining operations require physical availability and secure legal rights to significant quantities of water for mining and ore processing activities, and related support facilities. Most of our North America and South America mining operations are in areas where competition for water supplies is significant. Continuous production at our minessuccess is dependent on many factors, includingthe contributions of our highly skilled and experienced workforce. Our business depends upon our ability to maintain our water rightsattract, retain and claims,develop a qualified, inclusive and diverse workforce. Our ability to attract qualified personnel is affected by the continuing physical availabilityavailable pool of workers with the water supplies.

As discussed in Item 3 “Legal Proceedings”, in Arizona, where our operations use both surfacetraining and groundwater, we are a participant in an activeskills necessary to fill the available positions, the impact on the labor supply due to general stream adjudication in which Arizona courts have been attempting, for over 40 years, to quantifyeconomic conditions and prioritize surface water claims for the Gila River, one of the state’s largest river systems. This stream adjudication primarily affects our Morenci, Safford and Sierrita mines. The adjudication is addressing the state law claims of thousands of competing users, including us, as well as significant federal water claims that are potentially adverse to the state law claims of both surface water and groundwater users. Groundwater is treated differently from surface water under Arizona law, which historically allowed landowners to pump subsurface water, subject only to the requirement of putting it to “reasonable use.” However, court decisions in the adjudication have concluded that some underground water constitutes “subflow” that is to be treated legally as surface water and is therefore subject to the Arizona doctrine of prior appropriation and subject to the adjudication and potentially unavailable to groundwater pumpers in the absence of valid surface water claims. Any re-characterization of groundwater as surface water could affect the ability of consumers, farmers, ranchers, municipalities, and industrial users like us to continue to access water supplies that have been relied on for decades. Because we are a user of both groundwater and surface water in Arizona, we are an active participant in the adjudication proceedings. Given the legal and technical complexity of these adjudications, their long history, and their long-term legal, economic and political implications, it is difficult to predict the timing or the outcome of these proceedings. If we are not able to satisfactorily resolve the issues being addressed in the adjudications, our ability to pump groundwater could be diminished or curtailed,offer competitive compensation and our operations at Morenci, Saffordbenefit packages. If we fail to attract, retain and Sierrita could be adversely affected unless we are able to acquire alternative resources.

Water for our Cerro Verde operation in Peru comes from renewable sources through a series of storage reservoirs on the Rio Chili watershed that collects water primarily from seasonal precipitation. As a result of occasional drought conditions, temporary supply shortages are possible that could affect our Cerro Verde operations.

Water for our El Abra mining operation in Chile comes from the continued pumping of groundwater from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer. In 2010, El Abra obtained regulatory approvaldevelop qualified, inclusive and diverse personnel necessary for the continued pumpingefficient operation of groundwater from the Salar de Ascotán aquifer for its sulfide processing plant,our business, this could result in decreased profitability, productivity and efficiency, which began operations in 2011. The agreement to pump from this aquifer is subject to continued monitoring of the aquifer level to ensure that environmentally

sensitive areas are not impacted by our pumping. If impact occurs, we wouldmay have to reduce pumping to restore water levels, which could have ana material adverse effect on production from El Abra.our performance.


Although we typically have sufficient water for our Indonesian operations (the area receives considerable rainfall that has ledRisks related to periodic floodsdevelopment projects and mudslides), lower rainfall could affect our water supply availability from time to time.mineral reserves

Although each of our mining operations currently has access to sufficient water supplies to support current operational demands, as discussed above some supplies are subject to adjudication proceedings, the outcome of which we cannot predict, and the availability of additional supplies that may be required for potential future expansions is uncertain. While we are taking actions to acquire additional back-up water supplies, such supplies may not be available at acceptable cost, or at all, so that the loss of a water right or currently available water supply could force us to curtail operations or force premature closures, thereby increasing and/or accelerating costs or foregoing profitable operations.


Development projects are inherently risky and may require more capital and have lower economic returns than anticipated, which could adversely affect our business. Theand the development of our underground mines and operations are also subject
to other unique risks.


Mine development projects typically require a number of years and significant expenditures during the development phase before production is possible. Currently, our major miningOur development projects include underground development activities at the Grasberg Block Cave, DMLZ and Kucing Liar ore bodies in the Grasberg minerals district, which currently constitutesconstitute approximately 3028 percent of our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable copper reserves and development94 percent of the Lone Star oxide project in Arizona.our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable gold reserves. There are many risks and uncertainties inherent in all development projects including, but not limited to, unexpected or difficult geological formations or conditions, potential delays, cost overruns, lower levels of production during ramp-up periods, shortages of material or labor, construction defects, breakdowns and injuries to persons and property.

The development of our underground mines and operations are also subject to other unique risks including, but not limited to, underground fires or floods, ventilating harmful gases, fall-of-ground accidents, and seismic activity resulting from unexpected or difficult geological formations or conditions. For example, we experience mining induced seismic activity from time to time in the Grasberg minerals district. While we anticipate taking all measures that we deem reasonable and prudent in connection with the development of our underground mines to safely manage production, there is no assurance that these risks will not cause schedule delays, revised mine plans, injuries to persons and property, or increased capital costs, any of which may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, although we devote significant time and resources to our project planning, approval and review processes, many of our development projects are highly complex and rely on factors that are outside of our control, which may cause us to underestimate the actual time and capital required to complete a development project.project to exceed our estimates.


For example, in September 2015, we initiated pre-commercial production at the Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) underground mine in the Grasberg minerals district. During second-quarter 2018, PT-FI revised its mine plans to incorporate a slower ramp-up of the DMLZ underground mine following the continuing occurrence of mining induced seismic activity experienced in 2017 and 2018. PT-FI commenced hydraulic fracturing activities during third-quarter 2018 to manage rock stresses and pre-condition the DMLZ underground mine for large-scale production. Although results to date have been effective in managing rock stresses, we cannot predict whether additional occurrences of seismic activity or other unexpected geological activity will occur that could cause schedule delays or additional revisions to PT-FI’s mine plans, which could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. PT-FI currently expects the DMLZ to reach full production rates of 80,000 metric tons per day in 2022; however, estimates of timing of future production continue to be reviewed and may be modified as additional information becomes available.

58


Our decision to develop a project is typically based on the results of feasibility studies, which estimate the anticipated economic returns of a project. In addition, the economic feasibility of development projects is based on many factors, including the accuracy of estimated reserves, estimated capital and operating costs, and estimated future prices of the relevant commodity. Consolidated capital expenditures are expected to approximate $2.4 billion for the year 2019, including $1.5 billion for major mining projects primarily associated with underground development activities in the Grasberg minerals district and development of the Lone Star oxide project.

New development projects have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future cash flow. The actual costs, production rates and economic returns of our development projects may differ materially from our estimates, which may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

We must continually replace reserves depleted by production but explorationExploration is highly speculative, and our exploration activities may not result in additional discoveries.discoveries to replace mineral reserves.


Our existing mineral reserves will be depleted over time by production from our operations. Because our profits are primarily derived from our mining operations, our ability to replenish our mineral reserves is essential to our long-term success. Depleted mineral reserves can be replaced in several ways, including expanding known ore bodies, reducing operating costs that could extend the life of a mine by allowing us to cost-effectively process ore types that were previously considered uneconomic, by locating new deposits or acquiring interests in mineral reserves from third parties. Exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and uncertainties, requires substantial capital expenditures and, in some instances, advances in processing technology, and is frequently unsuccessful in discovering significant mineralization.mineral resources since new, large, long-life deposits are increasingly scarce. Accordingly, our current or future exploration programs may not result in the discovery of additional deposits that can be produced profitably. Even if significant mineralization ismineral resources are discovered, it will likely take many years from the initial phases of exploration until commencement of production, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. We may not be able to discover, enhance, develop or acquire mineral reserves in sufficient quantities to maintain or grow our current reserve levels, which could negatively affect our cash flow,flows, results of operations and financial condition.


Estimates of proven and probablemineral reserves and mineralized materialmineral resources are uncertain and the volume and grade of ore actually recovered may vary from our estimates.


EstimatesOur estimates of recoverable provenmineral reserves and probable reservesmineral resources have been calculatedprepared in accordance with Industry Guide 7 as required by the disclosure requirements of Subpart 1300 of U.S. Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.Commission (SEC) Regulation S-K. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral reserves.estimates. Such estimates are, to a large extent, based on the averageassumed long-term prices for the commodities we produce, primarily copper, gold and molybdenum, and interpretations of geologic data obtained from drill holes and other exploration techniques, which data may not necessarily be indicative of future results. Our mineral reserve estimates are based on the latest available geological and geotechnical studies. We conduct ongoing studies of our ore bodies to optimize economic values and to manage risk. We revise our mine plans and estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves as required in accordance with the latest available studies. Geological assumptions about our mineralizationmineral resources that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available.


Estimates of proven and probablemineral reserves, that will be recovered, or the cost at which we anticipate the mineral reserves will be recovered, are based on uncertain assumptions. The uncertain global financial outlookassumptions, such as metal prices and other economic inputs. Changes to such assumptions may affect economic assumptions relatedrequire revisions to reserve recovery and may require reserve revisions. Changes to reserve estimates which could affect our asset carrying values and may also negatively impact our future financial condition and results. Until mineral reserves are actually mined and processed, the quantity of ore and grades must be considered as an estimate only.


In addition, if the market prices for the commodities we produce decline from recentassumed levels, if production costs increase or recovery rates decrease, or if applicable laws and regulations are adversely changed, we can offer no assurance that the indicated level of recovery will be realized or that mineral reserves can be mined or processed profitably. If we determine that certain of our estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves have become uneconomic, this may ultimately lead to a reduction in our aggregate reported mineral reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Additionally, the term “mineralized material”“mineral resources” does not indicate recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves as defined by the U.S. SecuritiesSEC. Estimates of mineral resources are subject to further exploration and Exchange Commission. Mineralized material is a mineralized body that has been delineated by appropriately spaced drilling and/or underground sampling to support the reported tonnage and average metal grades. Such a deposit cannot qualify as recoverable proven and probable reserves until legal and economic feasibility are confirmed based upon a comprehensive evaluation of development costs, unitand operating costs, grades, recoveries and other material factors, and, therefore, are therefore, subject to considerable uncertainty. Mineral resources do not meet the threshold for mineral reserve modifying factors, such as engineering, legal and/or economic feasibility, that would allow for the conversion to mineral reserves. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the estimated mineralized materialmineral resources not included in mineral reserves will become recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves.


Our operations are subject to extensive
59


Regulatory, environmental and social risks

The costs of compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations some of which require permitsapplicable to our operations may constrain existing operations or expansion opportunities. Related permit and other approvals. These regulations increase our costs and in some circumstancesapproval requirements may delay or suspendresult in a suspension of our operations.


Our operations are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations, that are subject to change and to changing interpretation by governmental agencies and other bodies vested with broad supervisory authority. As a mining company, compliance with environmental legal requirements is an integral and costly part of our business. For additional information, see “Environmental risks” below. We are also subject to extensive regulation of worker health and safety, including the requirements of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and similar laws of

other jurisdictions. In the U.S., the operation of our mines is subject to regulation by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Additionally in the U.S. various state agencies have concurrent jurisdiction arising under state law that regulate worker health and safety in both our industrial facilities and mines. If regulatory inspections result in an alleged violation, we may be subject to fines and penalties and, in instances of alleged significant violations, our mining operations or industrial facilities could be subject to temporary or extended closures. Refer to Exhibit 95 to this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding certain orders and citations issued by MSHA for our operations during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Many other governmental bodies regulate other aspects of our operations, and our failure to comply with these legal requirements can result in substantial penalties. In addition, new laws and regulations or changes to existing laws and regulations and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations by courts or regulatory authorities occur regularly, but are difficult to predict. Any such variations could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is dependent upon information technology systems, which may be adversely affected by disruptions, damage, failure and risks associated with implementation and integration.

Our strategy of operating large, long-lived, geographically diverse assets has been increasingly dependent on our ability to become fully integrated and highly automated. Many of our business and operational processes are heavily dependent on traditional and emerging technology systems to conduct day-to-day operations, improve safety and efficiency, and lower costs. As our dependence on information systems, including those of our third party service providers and vendors, grows, we become more vulnerable to an increasing threat of continually evolving cybersecurity risks.

Cybersecurity incidents are increasing in frequency and magnitude. These incidents may include, but are not limited to, installation of malicious software, phishing, credential attacks, unauthorized access to data and other advanced
and sophisticated cybersecurity breaches and threats, including threats that increasingly target critical operational
technologies and process control networks. If any of these threats materialize, we could be subject to manipulation
or improper use of our systems and networks, production downtimes, communication interruption or other disruptions and delays to our operations or to the transportation of products or infrastructure utilized by our operations, unauthorized release of proprietary, commercially sensitive, confidential or otherwise protected information, the corruption of data, significant health and safety consequences, environmental damage, loss of intellectual property, fines and litigation, damage to our reputation or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition. We have experienced targeted and non-targeted cybersecurity incidents in the past and may experience them in the future. While these cybersecurity incidents did not result in any material loss to us or interrupt our day-to-day operations, there can be no assurance that we will not experience any such losses in the future.

We believe we have implemented appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks. However, given the unpredictability of the timing and the evolving nature and scope of information technology disruptions, the various procedures and controls we use to monitor and protect against these threats and to mitigate our potential risks to such threats may not be sufficient in preventing cybersecurity incidents from materializing. Further, as cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities to cybersecurity threats.

We could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into our operations. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to the system implementation and modification, but system modification failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations and could, if not successfully implemented, adversely impact the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.


Environmental risks

Our operations are subject to complex, evolving and increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental regulatory requirements involves significant costs and may constrain existing operations or expansion opportunities.

Our operations, both in the U.S. and internationally, are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations governing the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances; solid waste disposal; air emissions; wastewater discharges; remediation, restoration and reclamation of environmental contamination, including mine closures and reclamation; well plug and abandonment requirements; protection of endangered and protectedthreatened species and designation of critical habitats; and other related matters. These laws and regulations are subject to change and to changing interpretation by governmental agencies and other bodies vested with broad supervisory authority. As a mining company, compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations is an integral and costly part of our business. In addition, we must obtain regulatory permits and approvals to start, continue and expand operations.


Our Miami, Arizona, smelter processes approximately half of the aggregate copper concentrate produced by our North America copper mines. EPA regulations required us to invest approximately $230 million in new pollution control equipment to reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) to meet both regional haze requirements and to allow the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to demonstrate compliance with EPA’s SO2 ambient air quality standards. The new SO2 pollution control equipment was operational as of the January 1, 2018, deadline imposed by EPA and the Miami smelter has been in compliance with both the regional haze requirements and the ADEQ rules. ADEQ also has two SO2 monitors in the Miami area that continually read ambient SO2 levels, and during 2018, there were several instances in which ADEQ’s monitors read SO2 levels that exceeded the specified level. We are engaged in discussions with ADEQ and conducting an ongoing investigation of the cause of the ambient levels. We cannot guarantee that we will not be required to modify our system or install additional equipment to address findings or reflect new requirements or for other reasons, which could result in significant costs, including increased capital expenditures and operating costs, and could adversely impact our business.

Laws such as CERCLACertain federal and similar state laws and regulations may expose us to joint and several liability for environmental damages caused by our operations, or by previous owners or operators of properties we acquired or are currently operating or at sites where we previously sent materials for processing, recycling or disposal. As discussed in more detail in the next risk factor below relating to costs incurred for remediating environmental conditions on our properties that are no longer in operation,we have substantial obligations for environmental remediation on mining properties previously owned or operated by Freeport Minerals Corporation (FMC) and certain of its affiliates. Noncompliance with these laws and regulations could result in material penalties or other liabilities. In addition, compliance with these laws may from time to time result in delays in or changes to our development or expansion plans. Compliance with these laws and regulations imposes substantial costs, which we expect will continue to increase over time because of increased regulatory oversight, adoption of increasingly stringent environmental standards, as well asand other factors.


New or revised environmental regulatory requirements are frequently proposed, many of which result in substantially increased costs for our business, including those regarding financial assurance in the financial risk factor above.

In 2015, EPA adopted rules that added remote “tributaries” into the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” that are protected by the Clean Water Act, thereby imposing significant additional restrictions on land uses in remote areas with only tenuous connections to active waterways. These rules were challenged by multiple states and industry parties and litigation is ongoing. EPA has moved forward to rescind these rules and reconsider the definition of “waters of the United States” to clarify the scope of waters federally regulated under the Clean Water Act. A pre-publication version of a proposed revised definition of “waters of the United States” was issued by EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in December 2018. If adopted in final form as proposed, federal permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act could be less stringent which would limit or eliminate our need to obtain federal permits for future expansions at our operations in Arizona and New Mexico. However, there can be no assurance that the proposed revised definition will be adopted as proposed or that it will not be challenged by environmental groups.

obligations. Regulations have been considered at various governmental levels to increase federal financial responsibility requirements both for mine closure and reclamation and for oil and gas decommissioning. In January 2019, legislative bills were introduced in both Colorado and New Mexico that would eliminate self-bonding and parent company guarantees for financial assurance for mine closure and reclamation activities. We are working to retain flexibility in financial assurance forms at our operations, but if enacted as proposed, we would be precluded from using parent company guarantees for any financial assurance obligations associated with our Colorado and New Mexico operations, which would result in increased costs. The legislative bill introduced in Colorado would also

require proof of an end date for water treatment as a condition of permit issuance authorizing mining operations. Also in January 2019, legislation was proposed in New Mexico that would require water quality standards to be applied at the point of discharge to groundwater.reclamation. Adoption of these or similar newsuch environmental regulations or more stringent application of existing regulations may materially increase our costs, threaten certain operating activities and constrain our expansion opportunities.

Our mining operations are subject to regulations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that are intended to protect species listed by the Department of Interior’s Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) as endangered or threatened, along with critical habitat designated by FWS for these listed species. The regulations limit the ability of landowners, including us, to obtain federal permits or authorizations needed for expansion of our operations, and may also affect our ability to obtain, retain or deliver water to some operations. These regulations were revised in 2016 to expand the ability of FWS to designate critical habitat in areas that are not occupied by a listed species. As part of its plan to modernize the implementation of the ESA, the FWS issued proposed rules in July 2018 that, if finalized, could mitigate, but not eliminate, potential regulatory constraints on mining operations under the ESA, and change some aspects of the revised regulations adopted in 2016. FWS is also evaluating whether certain species should still be listed under the ESA, and reconsidering critical habitat that was proposed but never finalized. Environmental groups have aggressively challenged FWS’s regulatory reforms. No In addition, no assurances can be made that restrictions relating to conservation will not have an adverse impact on expansion of our operations or not result in delays in project development, constraints on exploration and constraints on operations in impacted areas.


We have incurred and expect to incur environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs (including our joint venture partners’ shares) to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations that affect our operations totaling $0.4 billion in 2018, $0.5 billion in 2017 and $0.4 billion in 2016. For 2019, we expect to incur approximately $0.5 billion of aggregate environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs.operations. The timing and amounts of estimated payments could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, changes in scope and costs of reclamation and plug and abandonment activities, the settlement of environmental matters and the rate at which actual spending occurs on continuing matters.


We are also subject to extensive regulation of worker health and safety. Our mines are inspected on a regular basis by government regulators who may issue citations and orders when they believe a violation has occurred under applicable mining regulations. If inspections result in an alleged violation, we may be subject to fines and penalties and, in instances of alleged significant violations, our mining operations or industrial facilities could be subject to temporary or extended closures.

Many other governmental bodies regulate other aspects of our operations, and our failure to comply with these legal requirements can result in substantial penalties. In addition, new laws and regulations, including executive orders, or changes to or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations by courts or regulatory authorities occur regularly, but are difficult to predict. Any such variations could negatively impact the mining sector, including our business, substantially increase costs to achieve compliance or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.

For additional information regarding the various regulations affecting us, see Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” of this annual report on Form 10-K.

60


We incur significant costs for remediating environmental conditions on properties that have not been operated in many years.


FMC and its subsidiaries, and many of their affiliates and predecessor companies, have been involved in exploration, mining, milling, smelting and manufacturing in the U.S. for more than a century. Activities that occurred in the late 19th century and the 20th century prior to the advent of modern environmental laws were not subject to environmental regulation and were conducted before American industrial companies fully understood the long-term effects of their operations on the surrounding environment.


With the passage of CERCLA in 1980, companiesCompanies like FMC becameare now legally responsible for remediating hazardous substances released into the environment from properties owned or operated by them as well as properties where they arranged for disposal of such substances, irrespective of when the release to the environment occurred or who caused it. That liability is often asserted on a joint and several basis with other prior and subsequent owners, operators and arrangers, meaning that each owner or operator of the property is, and each arranger may be, held fully responsible for the remediation, although in many cases some or all of the other responsible parties no longer exist, do not have the financial ability to respond or cannot be found. As a result, because of our acquisition of FMC in 2007, many of the subsidiary companies we now own are potentially responsible for a wide variety of environmental remediation projects throughout the U.S., and we expect to spend substantial sums annually for many years to address those remediation issues. We are also subject to claims where the release of hazardous substances is alleged to have damaged natural resources.

At December 31, 2018,2021, we had more than 100 active remediation projects in 2624 U.S. states. In addition, FMC and certain affiliates and predecessor companies were parties to agreements relating to the transfer of businesses or properties that contained indemnification provisions relating to environmental matters, and from time to time these provisions become the source of claims against us.

At December 31, 2018, we had $1.5 billion recorded in our consolidated balance sheet for environmental obligations attributable to CERCLA or analogous state programs and for estimated future costs associated with environmental matters at closed facilities or closed portions of operating facilities.



Our environmental obligation estimates are primarily based upon:

Our knowledge and beliefs about complex scientific and historical facts and circumstances that in many cases occurred many decades ago;

Our beliefs and assumptions regarding the nature, extent and duration of remediation activities that we will be required to undertake and the estimated costs of those remediation activities, which are subject to varying interpretations; and

Our beliefs regarding the requirements that are imposed on us by existing laws and regulations and, in some cases, the clarification of uncertain regulatory requirements that could materially affect our environmental obligation estimates.


Significant adjustments to these estimates are likely to occur in the future as additional information becomes available. The actual environmental costs may exceed our current and future accruals for these costs, and any such changes could be material.


In addition, remediation standards imposed by EPAthe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state environmental agencies have generally become more stringent over time and may become even more stringent in the future. Imposition of more stringent remediation standards, particularly for arsenic and lead in soils, poses a risk that additional remediation work could be required at our active remediation sites and at sites that we have already remediated to the satisfaction of the responsible governmental agencies, and may increase the risk of toxic tort litigation.

EPA is considering how to reduce lead exposure in the environment under multiple environmental programs. Certain federal and state health agencies also support lower lead cleanup levels. The timing for these EPA activities is unclear, but any reduction in lead cleanup levels could result in material increases to our environmental reserves for ongoing residential property cleanup projects near former smelter sites.


Refer to Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” and Note 12 for further discussion of our environmental obligations.


Our Indonesia mining operations create difficult
61


We face increasing regulatory and costly environmental challenges,stakeholder expectations relating to our GHG emissions and future changes in environmental laws, or unanticipated environmental impacts from those operations, could require us to incur increased costs.

Mining operations on the scale of our Indonesia operations involve significant environmental risks and challenges. Our primary challenge is to dispose of the large amount of crushed and ground rock material, called tailings, that results from the process byenergy transition plans, which we physically separate the copper-, gold- and silver-bearing materials from the ore that we mine. Our tailings management plan, which has been approved by the Indonesian government, uses the unnavigable river system in the highlands near our mine to transport the tailings to an engineered area in the lowlands where the tailings and natural sediments are managed in a deposition area. Lateral levees have been constructed to help contain the footprint of the tailings and to limit their impact in the lowlands.

Another major environmental challenge is managing overburden, which is the rock that must be moved aside in the mining process to reach the ore. In the presence of air, water and naturally occurring bacteria, some overburden can generate acid rock drainage, or acidic water containing dissolved metals that, if not properly managed, canmay adversely affect the environment. In addition, certain overburden stockpiles are subject to erosion caused by the large amounts of rainfall, with the eroded stockpile material eventually being deposited in the lowlands tailings management area; this additional material influences the deposition of finer sediment material in the estuary, as well as presents the potential for increased environmental impacts. The Grasberg overburden stockpiles have experienced significant erosion, exacerbated by unanticipated work stoppages that adversely affected our ability to manage certain overburden stockpiles. The current tailings deposition management plan as well as environmental monitoring programs take into account the presence of this overburden in the lowlands tailings management area.

In the past, certain Indonesian government officials have raised questions with respect to our tailings and overburden management plans, including a suggestion thatbusiness. Further, we implement a pipeline system rather than the river transport system for tailings management and disposition. Because our Indonesia mining operations are remotely located in steep mountainous terrain and in an active seismic area, a pipeline system would be costly, difficult to construct and maintain, and more prone to catastrophic failure, and could therefore involve significant potentially

adverse environmental issues. Based on our own studies and others conducted by third parties we do not believe that a pipeline system is necessary or practical.

In October 2017, Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry (the MOEF) notified PT-FI of administrative sanctions related to certain activities that it indicated are not reflected in PT-FI’s environmental permit. The MOEF also notified PT-FI that certain operational activities were inconsistent with factors set forth in PT-FI’s environmental permitting studies and that additional monitoring and improvements need to be undertaken related to air quality, water drainage, treatment and handling of certain wastes, and tailings management. In April 2018, the MOEF issued decrees imposing unattainable environmental standards related to PT-FI’s controlled riverine tailings management system. The decrees included a six-month transition period and conflicted with PT-FI’s approved environmental management programs and existing environmental permits. In December 2018, the MOEF issued a revised environmental permit to PT-FI to address many of the operational activities that it alleged were inconsistent with earlier studies. The remaining administrative sanctions are being resolved through adoption of revised practices and, in a few situations, PT-FI has agreed with the MOEF on an appropriate multi-year work plan, including the closure of an overburden stockpile.

PT-FI and the MOEF also established a new framework for continuous improvement in environmental practices in PT-FI’s operations, including initiatives that PT-FI will pursue to increase tailings retention and to evaluate large-scale beneficial uses of tailings within Indonesia. The MOEF issued a new decree that incorporates various initiatives and studies to be completed by PT-FI during 2019 targeting continuous improvement in a manner that would not impose new technical risks or significant long-term costs to PT-FI’s operations. The new framework enables PT-FI to maintain compliance with site-specific standards and provides for ongoing monitoring by the MOEF. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.

We cannot assure you that future environmental changes affecting the mining industry in Indonesia willmay not be introducedable to timely or unexpectedly altered or repealed, or that new interpretations of existing environmental laws and regulations will not be issued,successfully transition from fossil fuel sources for our significant energy needs, which might have a significant impact on PT-FI.may result in reputational damage.


Our copper mining operations require significant energy, and regulationmuch of greenhouse gas emissionswhich is currently from fossil fuel sources and climate change issues may increase our costs and adverselyaffect our operations.

Our copper mining operations require significant energy, principally diesel, electricity, coal and natural gas, most of which is obtained from third parties under long-term contracts. Energy represented approximately 2021 percent of our copper mine site operating costs in 2018,2021, and areis expected to approximate 2025 percent in 2022. The principal sources of energy consumption at our mining operations are: diesel fuel, which powers mine trucks and other transportation equipment; purchased electricity, which powers core facilities and certain on-site metal processing operations; and coal and natural gas, which provides electricity at certain operations.

Existing and proposed new governmental conventions, laws, regulations and standards (both in the U.S. and internationally), including those related to climate and GHG emissions, may in the future add significantly to our operating costs, limit or modify our operations, and require more resources to comply and remediate in response. For additional information on climate change conventions, laws, regulations and standards applicable to FCX, refer to Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties”.

If we do not adapt to the expectations of stakeholders regarding a low-carbon future in a timely manner, it may result in reputational damage with key stakeholders impacting investor confidence, market value and access to and cost of capital. In response to climate change and societal demands for action, we have announced GHG emissions reduction targets and aspirations, which will result in additional costs to us, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to achieve any current or future GHG emissions targets or aspirations.

While we strive to transition to more renewable power sources for our mining operations, as a commercial consumer of power, our ability to reduce our GHG emissions associated with our power consumption demand is dependent upon the mix of our coppersuppliers and locally-available renewable energy resources at our various sites. The transition to renewable and other energy sources could, among other things, increase our capital expenditures, operating and energy costs, depending on the scope, magnitude and timing of increased regulation of fossil-fuel based energy production, including GHG emissions, as well as the availability of alternative energy sources.

In certain aspects of our operations, our ability to reduce our GHG emissions is directly dependent on the actions of third parties and technological solutions and innovation, and our ability to make significant, rapid changes in our GHG emissions in response to potential future regulations may be limited. For example, our diesel-fueled mine site operating costs in 2019.

Carbon-based energy istrucks are a significant inputcontributor to GHG emissions at our North America and South America operations, but reduction of emissions from mine trucks will depend upon the development of alternative-fueled mining equipment by our third-party suppliers. At our remote operations in Indonesia, we own and operate a coal-fired power plant, and our ability to transition to commercially viable alternative sources of energy will depend on, among other things, a feasibility study and technological considerations.

The physical impacts of climate change may adversely affect our mining operations, workforce and supply chain.

We recognize that as the climate changes, our operations, although haul truck diesel useworkforce and supply chain may be exposed to changes in the amountfrequency, intensity and/or duration of purchased power that is derivedintense storms, drought, flooding (including from fossil fuel or renewable sources varies significantly depending on site productionsea level rise at our coastal operations), wildfire, and country-specific circumstances. Theother extreme weather events and patterns. Such potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain, and would vary by operation based on particular geographic circumstances. At many of our mine sites, climate change is projected to impact local precipitation regimes, resulting in shorter-duration, higher-intensity storm events, and the potential for less precipitation overall. We could face increased operational costs associated with managing additional volumes of storm water during more intense future events, including supply disruption, delays and increased pricing. In addition, the potential for overall decreases in precipitation could affect the availability of water needed for our operations, leading to increased operating costs, or in extreme cases, disruptions to mining operations.

In addition, with respect to our tailings facilities, as part of our commitment to implementing the Tailings Standard (discussed in Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” herein), we will be required to consider uncertainties due to climate change, incorporate that assessment into the relevant knowledge base for our tailings facilities, use this knowledge base to enhance the resilience of our approach to the impacts of climate change using an adaptive management approach, incorporate that knowledge into facility operations, and take measures to mitigate both
62


environmental impact and potential failure risks at our tailings facilities, including those arising from climate change. These obligations likely will require future changes at our tailings facilities, which could increase our operational expenses or require further capital investments.

Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from stakeholders with respect to our ESG practices, performance, commitments and disclosures may impact our reputation, increase our costs and impact our access to capital.

Stakeholder scrutiny related to our ESG practices, commitments, performance and disclosures continues to increase. We have adopted certain policies and programs, including with respect to responsible production frameworks, climate change, water stewardship, biodiversity, tailings management and stewardship, waste management, safety and health, human capital management, human rights, social performance and community and Indigenous Peoples relations, and supply chain/responsible sourcing. It is possible, however, that our stakeholders might not be satisfied with our ESG practices, commitments, performance and/or disclosures, or the speed of their adoption, implementation and measurable success. If we do not meet our stakeholders’ evolving expectations, our reputation, access to and cost of capital, and stock price could be negatively impacted.

Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, creditors and other influential investors are increasingly focused on our ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the ESG implications of their investments and lending decisions.

Organizations that provide information to investors and financial institutions on ESG performance and related matters have developed quantitative and qualitative data collection processes and ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. In addition, many investors have created their own proprietary ratings that inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ratings or assessment of our ESG practices, including our compliance with certain disclosure standards and frameworks, may lead to negative investor sentiment toward us, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and cost of capital.

Similarly, some financial institutions have incorporated ESG ratings into their credit risk assessments, and screen companies based on their ESG practices and performance when making lending decisions. If we are unable to meet the ESG lending criteria set by our creditors or are required to take certain remediation steps to satisfy such criteria, our access to capital on terms we find favorable may be limited and our costs may increase.

As we continue to focus on our ESG practices, commitments, performance and disclosures, and as ESG-related regulations and disclosure standards and frameworks continue to evolve, we have expanded our public disclosures in these areas. Such disclosures may reflect goals, aspirations, commitments, cost estimates and other expectations and assumptions, including over long timeframes, which are necessarily uncertain and may not be realized.

Further, the voluntary disclosure standards or frameworks we choose to align with are evolving and may change over time and our interpretation of such disclosure standards and frameworks may differ from those of others, either of which may result in a resultlack of consistent or meaningful comparative data from period to period and/or significant revisions to our goals and aspirations or reported progress in achieving such goals and aspirations.

Ensuring that there are adequate systems and processes in place to comply with the various ESG tracking and disclosure obligations will require management’s time and expense. If we do not adapt to or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations, including with respect to evolving disclosure standards and frameworks, or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage and our business, financial condition, cost of capital and/or stock price could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, our customers and end users may require that we implement certain additional ESG procedures or standards before they will start or continue to do business with us, which could lead to preferential buying based on our ESG practices compared to our competitors’ ESG practices. Further, being associated with activities by suppliers, contractors or other affiliates that have or are perceived to have individual or cumulative adverse impacts on the environment, climate, biodiversity and land management, water access and management, human rights or cultural heritage could negatively affect our reputation and impose additional costs.

63


Failure or the perceived failure to manage our relationships with the communities and/or Indigenous Peoples where we operate or that are near our operations could harm our reputation and social license to operate.

Our relationships with the communities and/or Indigenous Peoples where we operate or that are adjacent to or near our operations are critical to the long-term success of our existing operations and the development of any future projects. There is ongoing and increasing stakeholder concern relating to a company’s social license to operate and the perceived effects of mining activities on the environment and on communities impacted by such activities. We may engage in activities, such as exploration, production, construction or expansion of our operations that have or are perceived to have adverse impacts on the local communities and their relevant stakeholders, society as a whole, Indigenous Peoples, cultural heritage, human rights and the environment, among other things. For example, our operations may take place on or adjacent to Indigenous Peoples’ ancestral lands, and such Indigenous Peoples may assert rights to the lands where we operate. Further, we may be required or expected by our stakeholders to consult with and/or obtain consent from Indigenous Peoples with respect to these operations.

In addition, our assets are generally long-lived and stakeholders’ perceptions and expectations can change over the life of the Paris Agreement reached duringmine. Changes in the 21st Conferenceaspirations and expectations of the Partieslocal communities and/or Indigenous Peoples where we operate, with respect to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2015, a number of governments have pledged “Nationally Determined Contributions”our employee health and safety performance and our contributions to control and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In the U.S., several states, including Colorado and New Mexico, have advanced goals reducing or eliminating fossil-fuel based energy production. Transitions to renewableinfrastructure, community development, environmental management and other energy sourcesfactors could amongaffect our social license to operate and reputation, and could lead to delays and/or increased costs if expansions or new projects are blocked either temporarily or for extended periods. Failure to effectively engage with communities on an ongoing basis, including the withdrawal of consent or support of Indigenous Peoples, or other things, increasestakeholders, could adversely impact our operating and energy costs depending on the scope and magnitudebusiness, damage our reputation and/or result in loss of increased regulation of fossil-fuel based energy production, including greenhouse gas emissions.rights to explore, operate or develop our projects.


Other risksRisks related to our common stock


Our holding company structure may impact our ability to service our debt, declare dividends and our stockholders ability to receive dividends.repurchase shares.


We are a holding company with no material assets other than the capital stock and intercompany receivables of our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to repay our indebtedness and pay dividends is dependent on the generation of cash flowflows by our subsidiaries and their ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, loan, debt repayment or otherwise. Our subsidiaries do not have any obligation to make funds available to us to repay our indebtedness or pay dividends. Dividends from subsidiaries that are not wholly owned are shared with other equity owners. Cash at our international operations is also typically subject to foreign withholding taxes upon repatriation into the U.S.



In addition, our subsidiaries may not be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions to us or repay loans to us, to enable us to repay our indebtedness or pay dividends. Each of our subsidiaries is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal restrictions, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of our subsidiaries, may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. Certain of our subsidiaries are parties to credit agreements that restrict their ability to make distributions or loan repayments to us if such subsidiary is in default under such agreements, or to transfer substantially all of the assets of such subsidiary without the consent of the lenders.

Our rights to participate in any distribution of our subsidiaries’ assets upon their liquidation, reorganization or insolvency would generally be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiaries’ creditors, including any trade creditors.


As more fully described in Note 10, during 2021, our Board of Directors (Board) adopted a performance-based payout framework, which currently includes base and variable dividends and a share repurchase program. Our ability to continue to pay dividends (base or variable) and the timing and amount of any share repurchases is at the discretion of our Board and management, respectively, and is subject to a number of factors, including maintaining our net debt target, capital availability, our financial results, cash requirements, business prospects, global economic conditions, changes in laws, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board or management, as applicable. Our share repurchase program may be modified, increased, suspended or terminated at any time at the Board’s discretion. Our dividend payments and share repurchases may change, and we cannot provide assurance that we will continue to declare dividends or repurchase shares at all or in any particular amounts. A reduction or suspension in our dividend payments or share repurchases could have a negative effect on the price of our common stock.

64


Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may make an acquisition of us more difficult.


Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may make an acquisition of us more difficult. These provisions:

Authorize the Board to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each class; if issued, such preferred stock would increase the number of outstanding shares of our capital stock and could include terms that may deter an acquisition of us;

Establish advance notice requirements for nominations to the Board or for proposals that can be presented at stockholder meetings;

Limit who may call stockholder meetings; and

Require the approval of the holders of two thirds of our outstanding common stock to enter into certain business combination transactions, subject to certain exceptions, including if the consideration to be received by our common stockholders in the transaction is deemed to be a fair price.

These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by the Board. Refer to Exhibit 4.1 for further discussion of our anti-takeover provisions.


Further, our By-Laws provide to the fullest extent permitted by law that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware) will be the sole and exclusive forum for any (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) action asserting a claim that is based upon a violation of a duty by any of our current or former directors, officers, employees or stockholders in such capacity, (iii) action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or to which the Delaware General Corporation Law confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, (iv) action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, or (v) action asserting an “internal corporate claim” as that term is defined in Section 115 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The choice of forum provision may increase costs to bring a claim, discourage claims or limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us or our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our By-Laws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions. The exclusive forum provision in our By-laws will not preclude or contract the scope of exclusive federal or concurrent jurisdiction for actions brought under the federal securities laws including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the respective rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit large stockholders from consummating a merger with, or acquisition of, us.


These provisions may deter an acquisition of us that might otherwise be attractive to our stockholders.


Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.


Not applicable.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings.


We are involved in numerousBelow is a discussion of our material pending legal proceedings that arisenot otherwise required to be disclosed in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 12 for a discussion of other material pending legal proceedings.

In addition to the ordinary course of our business ormaterial pending legal proceedings discussed below and in Note 12, we are associated with environmental issues. We are also involved periodically in reviews, inquiries, investigationsordinary routine litigation incidental to our business and other proceedings initiated by or involving government agencies,not required to be disclosed, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief.

United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations require us to disclose environmental proceedings involving a governmental authority if we reasonably believe that such proceedings may result in monetary sanctions above a stated threshold. Pursuant to the SEC regulations, we use a threshold of $1 million for purposes of determining whether disclosure of any such environmental proceedings is required.

Management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition; although individual or cumulative outcomes could be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on the nature and magnitude of the outcome and the operating results for the period.




Below is a discussion of our material legal proceedings not otherwise required to be disclosed in Note 12. Refer to Note 12 for discussion of additional material legal proceedings.
65



Water Rights Adjudications


Our operations in the western United States (U.S.)U.S. require significant secure quantities of water for mining and ore processing activities, and related support facilities. Continuous operation of our mines is dependent on, among other things, our ability to maintain our water rights and claims and the continuing physical availability of the water supplies. In the arid western U.S., where certain of our mines are located, water rights are often contested, and disputes over water rights are generally time-consuming, expensive and not necessarily dispositive unless they resolve both actual and potential claims. The loss of a water right or a currently available water supply could force us to curtail operations, or force premature closures, thereby increasing and/or accelerating costs or foregoing profitable operations.


At our North America operations, certain of our water supplies are supported by surface water rights, which give us the right to use public waters for a statutorily defined beneficial use at a designated location. In Arizona, where our operations use both surface and groundwater, we are a participant in an active general stream adjudication in which Arizona courts have been attempting, for over 4045 years, to quantify and prioritize surface water claims for the Gila River system, one of the state’s largest river systems. This streamGila River adjudication primarily affects our Morenci, Safford (including Lone Star) and Sierrita mines. The Gila River adjudication is addressing the state law claims of thousands of competing users, including us, as well as significant federal water claims that are potentially adverse to the state law claims of both surface water and groundwater users. Groundwater is treated differently from surface water under Arizona law, which historically allowed land owners to pump unlimited quantities of subsurface water, subject only to the requirement of putting it to “reasonable use.” However, court decisions in the adjudication have concluded that some undergroundsubsurface water constitutes “subflow” that is to be treated legally as surface water and is therefore subject to the Arizona doctrine of prior appropriation and to the adjudication, and potentially unavailable to groundwater pumpers, including us, in the absence of valid surface water claims. Any re-characterization of groundwater as surface water could affect the ability of consumers, farmers, ranchers, municipalities, and industrial users like us to continue to access water supplies that have been relied on for decades. Because we are a user of both groundwater and surface water in Arizona, we are an active participant in the adjudication proceeding.Gila River adjudication.


In Re The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Sources, Maricopa County, Superior Court, Cause Nos. W-1 (Salt), W-2 (Verde), W-3 (Upper Gila), and W-4 (San Pedro). This case was originally initiated in 1974 with the filing of a petition with the Arizona State Land Department and was consolidated and transferred to the Maricopa County Superior Court in 1981. The principal parties, in addition to us, include: Arizona Public Service Company, ASARCO, LLC; BHP Copper, Inc; the state of Arizona; various cities and towns and water companies; the Gila Valley Irrigation District; the Franklin Irrigation District; the San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District; the Salt River Project; the San Carlos Apache Tribe; the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC);Community; and the U.S. on behalf of those tribes, on its own behalf, and on behalf of the White Mountain Apache Tribe, the Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Indian Community, the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, and the Payson Community of Yavapai Apache Indians.

Prior to January 1, 1983, various Indian tribes filed separate suits in the U.S. District Court in Arizona claiming superior rights to water being used by many other parties, including us, and claiming damages for prior use in derogation of their allegedly superior rights. These federal proceedings have been stayed in favor of the adjudications pending thein Arizona Superior Court adjudicationsstate courts, and some of the federal suits have since been settled.


In 2005, the Maricopa County Superior Court directed the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) to prepare detailed recommendations regarding the delineation of the “subflow” zone of the San Pedro River, a tributary of the Gila River. UndergroundSubsurface water within the subflow zone is presumed to constitute appropriable subflow rather than groundwater. Although we have minimal interests in the San Pedro River Basin, a decision that re-characterizes groundwater in that basin as appropriable surface watersubflow may set a precedent for other river systems in Arizona that could have material implications for many commercial, industrial, municipal and agricultural users of groundwater, including our Arizona operations. In 2017, the court approved ADWR’s proposed subflow zone delineation.maps; water pumped from wells located inside the mapped subflow zone is now presumed to be appropriable subflow. No party has appealed that decision.


ADWR is now in the process of preparing subflow delineations for the applicable watercourses in Verde River watershed. In December 2021, ADWR issued a report proposing a delineation for the Verde River mainstem and Sycamore Creek and objections to that report are due in May 2022. We do not have any active mining operations in the Verde watershed that would be impacted by this phase of the adjudication.


66


In 2014, ADWR submitted a proposal for the development of procedures for “cone of depression” analyses to determine whether a well located outside of the subflow zone creates a cone of depression that intersects the subflow zone. Based on thethese cone of depression analyses, wells outside of the subflow zone could be subject to the jurisdiction of the adjudication court.adjudications pending in Arizona state courts. In the absence of a valid surface water claim to support the pumping, owners

of wells deemed to be depleting the subflow zone through their cones of depression may be subject to claims that they must refrain from pumping subflow or must pay damages. In January 2017, ADWR issued a report containing its recommended cone of depression test, and a trial was held in March 2018 concerning ADWR’s recommended action.


On November 14, 2018, the court’s Special Master for the Gila River adjudication issued a final decision rejecting ADWR’s recommended cone of depression test, instead adopting our position that a numeric model capable of accounting for complexities of the aquifer system should be used. The Special Master also confirmed that this initialthe cone of depression test isinstead would be an initial test for determining which wells are subject to the jurisdiction of the adjudication court, notadjudications, rather than proving that a well is pumping subflow or establishing how much of a well’s water production is subflow. ThoseSuch matters will be determined by a subsequent “subflow depletion test,” which has not yet been formulated. OurSome of our adversaries are expectedobjected to seek review of the Special Master’s November 2018 final decision. Objections must be fileddecision, and the Arizona Superior Court heard oral argument on the objections in February 2020. This issue remains under advisement with the Arizona Superior Court in May 2019.Court.


In response to the Special Master’s decision, in December 2018, ADWR submitted its initial report on the “subflow depletion test,” which will specify the methodology a well owner must use to quantify the portion of the water drawn from a well that is subflow as opposed to groundwater. A status conference has been scheduledgroundwater; however, ADWR remains in February 2019the process of developing its proposed subflow depletion test. We, along with the other parties, will have the opportunity to identify issuesprovide input throughout the process.

The first issue litigated concerned whether for the subflow depletion test the subflow zone should be represented in the numeric model as extending only as deep as the bottom of the floodplain alluvium or extend all the way down to bedrock. In August 2021, the Special Master issued an order recognizing our position that if the vertical extent of the subflow zone is extended below the floodplain alluvium, it would result in overstated depletion calculations. Accordingly, the Special Master ordered that the vertical boundary of the subflow zone be restricted to the floodplain alluvium. To date, our adversaries have not taken steps to appeal this ruling.

In proceedings separate from the development of the depletion test, in June 2020, the Special Master designated legal questions to be addressed during this phaseresolved concerning a well owner’s ability to obtain a surface water right for subsurface water that, while initially believed to be non-appropriable groundwater, is ultimately determined to be appropriable subflow. In April 2021, the Special Master ruled that, for uses initiated after enactment of the litigation and1919 permitting statute, a well owner may not pursue a surface water right unless the well owner filed an application for a permit to discuss future case deadlines.appropriate.


As part of the Gila River adjudication,adjudications, the U.S. has asserted numerous claims for express and implied “reserved” surface water and groundwater rights on Indian and non-Indian federal lands throughout Arizona. These claims are related to reservations of federal land for specific purposes (e.g.(e.g., Indian reservations, national parks, military bases and wilderness areas). Unlike state law-based water rights, federal reserved water rights are given priority in the prior appropriation“prior appropriation” system based on the date the land was reserved, not the date that water was first used on the land. In addition, federal reserved water rights if recognized by the court, may enjoy greater protection from groundwater pumping than is accorded to state law-based water rights.


In multiple instances, the U.S. asserts a right to all water in a particular watershed that was not effectively appropriated under state law prior to the establishment of the federal reservation. This creates risks for both surface water users and groundwater users because such expansive claims may severely impede competing uses of water within the same watershed. Because there are numerous federal reservations in watersheds across Arizona, the reserved water right claims of the U.S. pose a significant risk to multiple operations, including Morenci and Safford (including Lone Star) in the Upper Gila River watershed, and Sierrita in the Santa Cruz watershed. Because federal reserved water rights may adversely affect water uses at each of these operations, we have been actively involved in litigation over these claims. Because federal reserved water rights have not yet been quantified, the task of determining how much water each federal reservation may use has been left to the Arizona Superior Court handling the Gila River adjudication court.adjudication. Several “contested cases” to quantify reserved water rights for particular federal reservations in Arizona are currently pending in the adjudication andwith only one was recently resolved.resolved at this time. That case, In re Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area, was to resolve the U.S.’s claims to water for the Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Area. The case was tried in 2015 and the court issued a decision in December 2018 supportive of our position on almost all issues, including rejection of the government’sU.S.’s core argument that wilderness areas are entitled to all water that was not appropriated
67


at the time the reservation was created. We believe the rulings in this case will support our positions in other pending federal reserved water right cases, including these: In re Fort Huachuca, which involves the U.S.’s claims to water for an Arizona army base and is awaiting a decision following a trial which concluded in February 2017;In re Redfield Canyon Wilderness Area, which involves the U.S.’s claims to water for another wilderness area and is awaiting a decision following a trial which concluded in May 2017; and In re San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area, which involves the U.S.’s claims to water for a national conservation area and is awaiting a decision following a trial which is currentlyconcluded in trial.May 2018.


Given the legal and technical complexity of these adjudications, their long history, and their long-term legal, economic and political implications, it is difficult to predict the timing or the outcome of these proceedings. If we are not able to satisfactorily resolve the issues being addressed in the adjudications, our ability to pump groundwater could be diminished or curtailed, and our operations at Morenci, Safford (including Lone Star) and Sierrita could be adversely affected unless we are able to acquire alternative water resources.


Environmental Legal Proceedings

Louisiana Parishes Coastal Erosion Cases
Certain FCX affiliates have been named as defendants, along with numerous co-defendants, in 13 cases out of a total of 42 cases filed in Louisiana state courts by six south Louisiana parishes (Cameron, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. John the Baptist and Vermilion), alleging that certain oil and gas exploration and production

operations and sulphur mining and production operations in coastal Louisiana have contaminated and damaged coastal wetlands, and caused significant land loss along the Louisiana coast, resulting in increased risk of damage from storm-generated surges and flooding and accelerated saltwater intrusion.  The State of Louisiana, through the Attorney General and separately through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, has intervened in the litigation in support of the parishes’ claims. Specifically, the cases allege the defendants failed to obtain and/or comply with required coastal use permits in violation of the Louisiana State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978, and seek unspecified damages for the alleged statutory violations, and restoration of the properties at issue to their original condition. Five of the 42 cases were previously scheduled for trials in state courts beginning in early 2019; however, the state court proceedings have been stayed while federal courts in the Eastern and Western Districts of Louisiana consider the defendants’ second effort to remove the cases from state courts to federal courts. Certain FCX affiliates have been named as defendants in two of the five cases that had been set for trial, both originally filed on November 8, 2013: Parish of Plaquemines v. ConocoPhillips Company et al, 25th Judicial District Court, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; No. 60-982, Div. B, which was set for jury trial in state court in August 2019; and Parish of Plaquemines v. Hilcorp Energy Company et al, 25th Judicial District Court, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; No. 60-999, Div. B, which was set for jury trial in state court in January 2020. Plaintiffs have not alleged specific monetary demands. FCX intends to vigorously defend these matters.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.


TheOur highest priority is the health, safety and well-being of our workforce. We believe that health of all employees is our highest priority. Management believes thatand safety and health considerations are integral to, and compatible with,fundamental for, all other functions in theour organization, and we understand that proper safety and health management will enhance production and reduce costs. Our approach towards the health and safety of our workforce is critical to continuously improve performanceour operational efficiency and long-term success. Our global health and safety approach, “Safe Production Matters,” is focused on fatality prevention and continuous improvement through implementingthe use of robust management systems, empowering safe work behaviors and providing adequate training,strengthening our safety incentive and occupational health programs.culture.


Our objective is to achieve zero work placeworkplace fatalities and to decrease injuries and occupational illnesses. We measure progress toward achieving our objective against regularly established benchmarks, including measuring company-wide Total Recordable Incident Rates (TRIR). Our TRIR (including contractors) per 200,000 man-hours worked was 0.710.69 in 2018, 0.75 in 2017both 2021 and 0.64 in 2016.2020. The metal mining sector industry average per 200,000 man-hours worked reported by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration was 1.741.70 for 2021 (preliminary for the period of January 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021) and 1.66 in 2017 and 1.93 in 2016. The metal mining sector industry average for 2018 was not available at the time of this filing.

2020. Refer to Exhibit 95.1 for mine safety disclosures required in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K.


Information About our Executive Officers of the Registrant.Officers.


Certain information as of January 31, 2019,February 15, 2022, about our executive officers is set forth in the following table and accompanying text:
NameAgePosition or Office
Richard C. Adkerson7275Vice Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer
Kathleen L. Quirk5558Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Harry M. “Red” Conger, IVStephen T. Higgins6364Senior Vice President and Chief OperatingAdministrative Officer - Americas
Douglas N. Currault II57Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Richard C. Adkerson has served as Vice Chairman of the Board since June 2013, President since January 2008 and also from April 1997 to March 2007,February 2021, Chief Executive Officer since December 2003 and has been a director since October 2006. Mr. Adkerson previously served as Vice Chairman of the Board from May 2013 to February 2021, President from January 2008 to February 2021 and also from April 1997 to March 2007, and Chief Financial Officer from October 2000 to December 2003.


Kathleen L. Quirk has served as Executive Vice President since March 2007February 2021 and as Chief Financial Officer since December 2003. Ms. Quirk previously served as Executive Vice President from March 2007 to February 2021, Treasurer from February 2000 to August 2018 and as Senior Vice President from December 2003 to March 2007. Ms. Quirk also serves on the Board of Directors of Vulcan Materials Company.


Harry M. “Red” Conger, IV Stephen T. Higginshas served as Senior Vice President since August 2018 and as Chief OperatingAdministrative Officer since January 2019. Mr. Higgins previously served as Vice President - Americas since July 2015,Sales and Marketing from March 2007 to August 2018 and as President - Americas since 2007. Mr. Congerof Freeport-McMoRan Sales Company, Inc. from April 2006 to August 2019.

68


Douglas N. Currault II has also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer - Rod and RefiningGeneral Counsel since October 2014. He2019. Mr. Currault previously served as Chief Operating Officer - Africa MiningDeputy General Counsel from JulyJanuary 2015 to October 2019, Assistant General Counsel from January 2008 to January 2015, Secretary from May 2007 to December 2016. Prior2019 and as Assistant Secretary from February 2000 to 2007, he served in a number of senior operations positions at Phelps Dodge Corporation.May 2007.


PART II


Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.


Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities


None.


Common Stock


Our common shares tradestock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “FCX.” At January 31, 2019,2022, there were 12,52010,719 holders of record of our common stock.


Common Stock Dividends


In December 2015, the FCXFebruary 2021, our Board of Directors (the Board) suspended the annual common stock dividend. Accordingly, there were no common stock dividends paid in 2017 or 2016. In February 2018, the Board reinstated a cash dividend on our common stock. See Note 10stock (base dividend) at an annual rate of $0.30 per share, and on November 1, 2021, the Board approved a variable cash dividend on our common stock for further discussion.2022 at an expected annual rate of $0.30 per share. The combined annual rate of the base dividend and the variable dividend is expected to total $0.60 per share for 2022.

On December 22, 2021, the Board declared cash dividends totaling $0.15 per share (which included the $0.075 per share quarterly base cash dividend and the $0.075 per share variable cash dividend) on our common stock, which was paid on February 1, 2022, to shareholders of record as of January 14, 2022. The declaration and payment of dividends (base or variable) is at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon our financial results, cash requirements, futurebusiness prospects, global economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of FCX common stock purchasedrelevant by us during the three months ended December 31, 2018:
Period
(a) Total
Number of
Shares Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid Per Share
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programsa
(d) Maximum Number of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programsa
October 1-31, 2018


23,685,500
November 1-30, 2018


23,685,500
December 1-31, 2018


23,685,500
Total


23,685,500
a.On July 21, 2008, the Board approved an increaseour Board. See “Cautionary Statement” in our open-market share purchase program for up to 30 million shares. The program does not have an expiration date.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA(In millions, except per share amounts) 
Revenues$18,628
 $16,403
 $14,830
a 
$14,607
a 
$20,001
a 
Operating income (loss)b
$4,754
c,d 
$3,690
e 
$(2,729)
f 
$(13,512)
g 
$(298)
h 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$2,909
i,j,k,l 
$2,029
i,j,k 
$(3,832)
j,k 
$(12,180)
l 
$(1,022)
j,k 
Net (loss) income from discontinued operationsm
$(15) $66
 $(193) $91
 $277
 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock$2,602
 $1,817

$(4,154)
n 
$(12,236)
$(1,308)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stock:          
Continuing operations$1.79
 $1.21
 $(2.96) $(11.32) $(1.37) 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20) 0.01
 0.11
 
 $1.78
 $1.25
 $(3.16) $(11.31) $(1.26) 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:          
Basic1,449
 1,447
 1,318
 1,082
 1,039
 
Diluted1,458
 1,454
 1,318
 1,082
 1,039
 
Dividends declared per share of common stock$0.20
 $
 $
 $0.2605
 $1.25
 
Operating cash flows$3,863
 $4,666
 $3,737
 $3,220
 $5,631
 
Capital expenditures$1,971
 $1,410
 $2,813
 $6,353
 $7,215
 
At December 31:          
Cash and cash equivalents$4,217
 $4,526
 $4,262
 $193
 $315
 
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net$28,010
 $22,994
 $23,348
 $24,245
 $22,927
 
Oil and gas properties, net$
 $
 $74
 $7,093
 $19,274
 
Assets held for sale, including current portiono
$
 $
 $5
 $4,862
 $4,829
 
Total assets$42,216
 $37,302
 $37,317
 $46,577
 $58,674
 
Total debt, including current portion$11,141
 $13,229
 $16,126
 $20,428
 $18,970
 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest$
 $
 $
 $764
 $751
 
Total stockholders’ equity$9,798
 $7,977
 $6,051
 $7,828
 $18,287
 
The selected consolidated financial data shown above is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that you can expect for any future period. You should read this data in conjunction with Items 7. and 7A. Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risks (MD&A)Risk” and Item 8. Financial StatementsNote 10 for further discussion.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In November 2021, our Board approved a new share repurchase program, which authorizes repurchases of up to $3.0 billion of our common stock. The timing and Supplementary Data thereto contained in our annual reportamount of the share repurchases is at the discretion of management and will depend on Form 10-Ka variety of factors. The program may be modified, increased, suspended or terminated at any time at the Board’s discretion. See Note 10 for further discussion.


69

The following table summarizes share repurchases made by us during the yearthree months ended December 31, 2018.2021, and the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to our share repurchase program:
Period(a) Total
Number of
Shares Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid Per Share
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programsa
(d) Maximum Number of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programsa
October 1-31, 2021—  $— — — 
November 1-30, 20212,680,026 $39.19 2,680,026 — 
December 1-31, 202110,518,245 b$38.04 10,062,511 — 
Total13,198,271 $38.27 12,742,537 12742537000000— 
a.On November 1, 2021, our Board approved a new share repurchase program authorizing repurchases of up to $3.0 billion of our common stock. This new share repurchase program superseded and replaced the share repurchase program previously authorized by our Board in July 2008. The new share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific amount of shares and does not have an expiration date.
b.Includes 455,734 shares acquired in connection with stock option exercises during the period shown. All references to income or losses perother share are on a diluted basis, unless otherwise noted.
a.
Includes net noncash mark-to-market (losses) gains associated with crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts totaling$(41) million ($(41) million to net loss attributable to common stock or $(0.03) per share) in 2016, $(319) million ($(198) million to net loss attributable to common stock or $(0.18) per share) in 2015 and $627 million ($389 million to net loss attributable to common stock or $0.37 per share) in 2014.
b.Includes net charges (credits) for adjustments to environmental obligations and related litigation reserves of $57 million ($57 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.04 per share) in 2018, $210 million ($210 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.14 per share) in 2017, $(16) million ($(16) million to net loss attributable to common stock or $(0.01) per share) in 2016, $43 million ($28 million to net loss attributable to common stock or $0.03 per share) in 2015 and $76 million ($50 million to net loss attributable to common stock or $0.05 per share) in 2014.
c.The year 2018 includes net credits totaling $96 million ($156 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.11 per share) consisting of gains on sales of assets totaling $208 million, partly offset by net charges of $69 million associated with Cerro Verde’s collective labor agreement and $43 million mostly associated with depreciation expense at Freeport Cobalt for the period December 2016 through December 2017, which was suspended while it was classified as held for sale.
d.
The year 2018 also includes net charges at PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI) totaling $223 million ($110 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.08 per share) consisting of $69 million for surface water tax disputes with the local regional tax authority in Papua,Indonesia,$32 million for assessments of prior period permit fees with Indonesia's Ministry of Environment and Forestry, $72 million for disputed payroll withholding taxes for prior years and other tax settlements, and $62 million to write-off certain previously capitalized project costs for the new smelter in Indonesia, partly offset by inventory adjustments totaling $12 million.

e.The year 2017 includes net charges totaling $68 million to operating income ($12 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.01 per share) consisting of charges totaling $125 million for workforce reductions at PT-FI and other net charges of $24 million mostly for asset impairments and metals inventory adjustments, partly offset by net gains on sales of assets totaling $81 million primarily associated with oil and gas transactions.
f.The year 2016 includes net charges totaling $4.9 billion to operating loss ($4.8 billion to net loss attributable to common stock or $3.67 per share) consisting of (i) $4.3 billion for impairment of oil and gas properties, (ii) $926 million for drillship settlements/idle rig and contract termination costs, (iii) $196 million for other charges at oil and gas operations primarily associated with inventory adjustments, asset impairment and other restructuring charges and (iv) $69 million for charges at mining operations for metals inventory adjustments, PT-FI asset retirement and Cerro Verde social commitments, partly offset by (v) net gains on sales of assets totaling $649 million mostly associated with the Morenci and Timok transactions, and net of estimated losses associated with assets held for sale.
g.The year 2015 includes net charges totaling $13.8 billion to operating loss ($12.0 billion to net loss attributable to common stock or $11.10 per share) consisting of (i) $13.1 billion for impairment of oil and gas properties, (ii) $338 million for metals inventory adjustments, (iii) $188 million for charges at oil and gas operations primarily associated with other asset impairment and inventory adjustments, idle/terminated rig costs and prior year mineral tax assessments related to the California properties, (iv) $145 million for charges at mining operations primarily associated with asset impairment, restructuring and other net charges and (v) $18 million for executive retirement benefits, partly offset by (vi) a net gain of $39 million for the sale of our interest in the Luna Energy power facility.
h.
The year 2014 includes net charges totaling $4.8 billion to operating loss ($3.6 billion to net loss attributable to common stock or $3.46 per share) consisting of (i) $3.7 billion for impairment of oil and gas properties, (ii) $1.7 billionto impair the full carrying value of goodwill, (iii) $46 million for charges at oil and gas operations primarily associated with idle/terminated rig costs and inventory adjustments and (iv) $6 million for adjustments to molybdenum inventories, partly offset by (v) net gains on sales of assets of $717 million primarily from the sale of our 80 percent interests in the Candelaria and Ojos del Salado mining operations.
i.Includes net charges at Cerro Verde related to disputed royalty matters for prior years totaling $195 million to net income attributable to common stock ($0.13 per share) in 2018 and $186 million to net income attributable to common stock ($0.13 per share) in 2017. Net charges for 2018 consist of charges (credits) of $14 million to operating income, $370 million to interest expense, $22 million to other expense, net of $35 million of net income tax benefits and $176 million to noncontrolling interests. Net charges for 2017 consist of $203 million to operating income, $145 million to interest expense and $7 million to provision for income taxes, net of $169 million to noncontrolling interests. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
j.Includes after-tax net gains (losses) on early extinguishment and exchanges of debt totaling $7 million (less than $0.01 per share) in 2018, $21 million ($0.01 per share) in 2017, $26 million ($0.02 per share) in 2016 and $3 million (less than $0.01 per share) in 2014.
k.As further discussed in “Consolidated Results - Income Taxes” contained in MD&A, amounts include net tax credits (charges) of $632 million ($574 million net of noncontrolling interests or $0.39 per share) in 2018, $438 million ($0.30 per share) in 2017, $370 million ($374 million net of noncontrolling interests or $0.28 per share) in 2016 and $(121) million ($(103) million net of noncontrolling interests or $(0.10) per share) in 2014.
l.The year 2018 includes a gain of $19 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.01 per share for interest received on tax refunds. The year 2015 includes a gain of $92 million to net loss attributable to common stock or $0.09 per share related to net proceeds received from insurance carriers and other third parties related to the shareholder derivative litigation settlement.
m.Discontinued operations reflects the results of TF Holdings Limited (TFHL), through which we held an interest in the Tenke Fungurume (Tenke) mine until it was sold on November 16, 2016, and includes charges for allocated interest expense associated with the portion of the term loan that was required to be repaid as a result of the sale. Net (loss) income from discontinued operations in 2018 and 2017 primarily reflect adjustments to the fair value of the potential contingent consideration related to the sale and will continue to be adjusted through December 31, 2019. The year 2016 also includes a net charge of $198 million for the loss on disposal.
n.Includes a gain on redemption of a redeemable noncontrolling interest of $199 million ($0.15 per share) associated with the settlement of a preferred stock obligation. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
o.In accordance with accounting guidelines, the assets and liabilities of TFHL have been presented as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.
repurchases were made under our publicly announced program.


FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA (Continued)Item 6. Reserved.

 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
CONSOLIDATED MINING (CONTINUING OPERATIONS)a,b
          
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production3,813
 3,737
 4,222
 3,568
 3,457
 
Sales, excluding purchases3,811
 3,700
 4,227
 3,603
 3,463
 
Average realized price per pound$2.91
 $2.93
 $2.28
 $2.42
 $3.09
 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)          
Production2,439
 1,577
 1,088
 1,257
 1,214
 
Sales, excluding purchases2,389
 1,562
 1,079
 1,247
 1,248
 
Average realized price per ounce$1,254
 $1,268
 $1,238
 $1,129
 $1,231
 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production95
 92
 80
 92
 95
 
Sales, excluding purchases94
 95
 74
 89
 95
 
Average realized price per pound$12.50
 $9.33
 $8.33
 $8.70
 $12.74
 
           
NORTH AMERICA COPPER MINES          
Operating Data, Net of Joint Venture Interestsc
          
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production1,404
 1,518
 1,831
 1,947
 1,670
 
Sales, excluding purchases1,428
 1,484
 1,841
 1,988
 1,664
 
Average realized price per pound$2.96
 $2.85
 $2.24
 $2.47
 $3.13
 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production32
 33
 33
 37
 33
 
100% Operating Data          
Leach operations          
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)681,400
 679,000
 737,400
 913,000
 1,011,500
 
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.24
 0.28
 0.31
 0.26
 0.25
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)951
 1,016
 1,120
 1,086
 963
 
Mill operations          
Ore milled (metric tons per day)301,000
 299,500
 300,500
 312,100
 273,800
 
Average ore grade (percent):          
Copper0.35
 0.39
 0.47
 0.49
 0.45
 
Molybdenum0.02
 0.03
 0.03
 0.03
 0.03
 
Copper recovery rate (percent)87.8
 86.4
 85.5
 85.4
 85.8
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)719
 788
 958
 1,020
 828
 
           
SOUTH AMERICA MININGb
          
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production1,249
 1,235
 1,328
 869
 1,151
 
Sales1,253
 1,235
 1,332
 871
 1,135
 
Average realized price per pound$2.87
 $2.97
 $2.31
 $2.38
 $3.08
 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production28
 27
 21
 7
 11
 
Leach operations          
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)195,200
 142,800
 149,100
 208,400
 246,400
 
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.33
 0.37
 0.41
 0.44
 0.48
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)287
 255
 328
 430
 491
 
Mill operations          
Ore milled (metric tons per day)387,600
 360,100
 353,400
 152,100
 180,500
 
Average ore grade:          
Copper (percent)0.38
 0.44
 0.43
 0.46
 0.54
 
Molybdenum (percent)0.01
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 
Copper recovery rate (percent)84.3
 81.2
 85.8
 81.5
 88.1
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)962
 980
 1,000
 439
 660
 


FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA (Continued)
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
INDONESIA MINING          
Operating Data, Net of Rio Tinto Joint Venture Interestd
          
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)          
Production1,160
 984
 1,063
 752
 636
 
Sales1,130
 981
 1,054
 744
 664
 
Average realized price per pound$2.89
 $3.00
 $2.32
 $2.33
 $3.01
 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)          
Production2,416
 1,554
 1,061
 1,232
 1,130
 
Sales2,366
 1,540
 1,054
 1,224
 1,168
 
Average realized price per ounce$1,254
 $1,268
 $1,237
 $1,129
 $1,229
 
100% Operating Data          
Ore milled (metric tons per day)178,100
 140,400
 165,700
 162,500
 120,500
 
Average ore grade:          
Copper (percent)0.98
 1.01
 0.91
 0.67
 0.79
 
Gold (grams per metric ton)1.58
 1.15
 0.68
 0.79
 0.99
 
Recovery rates (percent):          
Copper91.8
 91.6
 91.0
 90.4
 90.3
 
Gold84.7
 85.0
 82.2
 83.4
 83.2
 
Production:          
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)1,227
 996
 1,063
 752
 651
 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)2,697
 1,554
 1,061
 1,232
 1,132
 
           
MOLYBDENUM MINES          
Molybdenum production (millions of recoverable pounds)35
 32
 26
 48
 51
 
Ore milled (metric tons per day)27,900
 22,500
 18,300
 34,800
 39,400
 
Average molybdenum ore grade (percent)0.18
 0.20
 0.21
 0.2
 0.19
 
           
OIL AND GAS OPERATIONSe
          
Sales Volumes:          
Oil (million barrels)1.4
 1.8
 34.4
 35.3
 40.1
 
Natural gas (billion cubic feet)10.1
 15.8
 65.1
 89.7
 80.8
 
Natural gas liquids (NGLs) (million barrels)0.1
 0.2
 1.8
 2.4
 3.2
 
Million barrels of oil equivalents3.1
 4.6
 47.1
 52.6
 56.8
 
Average Realizations:          
Oil (per barrel)$54.13
 $40.71
 $39.13
 $57.11
 $90.00
 
Natural gas (per million British thermal units)
$3.15
 $3.18
 $2.38
 $2.59
 $4.23
 
NGLs (per barrel)$44.11
 $30.65
 $18.11
 $18.90
 $39.73
 
a.Excludes the results from the Tenke mine, which is reported as discontinued operations.
b.Includes the results of the Candelaria and Ojos del Salado mines prior to their sale in November 2014.
c.Net of Morenci’s joint venture interest; effective May 31, 2016, our undivided interest in Morenci was prospectively reduced from 85 percent to 72 percent. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
d.Prior to December 21, 2018, PT-FI had an unincorporated joint venture with Rio Tinto. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further discussion.
e.During the three years ended December 31, 2018, we completed sales of substantially all of our oil and gas assets. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.

Items 7. and 7A.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.


In Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk (MD&A), “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) and its consolidated subsidiaries. The results of operations reported and summarized below are not necessarily indicative of future operating results (refer to “Cautionary Statement” below for further discussion). References to “Notes” are Notes included in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Throughout MD&A, all references to earnings or losses per share are on a diluted basis, unless otherwise noted. Additionally,basis.

This section of our Form 10-K discusses the results of operations for the years 2021 and 2020 and comparisons between these years. Discussion of the results of operations for the year 2019 and comparisons between the years 2020 and 2019 are not included in accordance with accounting guidelines, TF Holdings Limited (TFHL), through which we held a controlling interestthis Form 10-K and can be found in Items 7. and 7A. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Tenke Fungurume (Tenke) mine until it was sold on November 16, 2016, is reported as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.


OVERVIEW


We are a leading international mining company with headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona. We operate large, long-lived, geographically diverse assets with significant proven and probable mineral reserves of copper, gold and molybdenum. We are one of the world’s largest publicly traded copper producer.producers. Our portfolio of assets includes the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia, one of the world’s largest copper and gold deposits; and significant mining operations in the Americas,North America and South America, including the large-scale Morenci minerals district in North AmericaArizona and the Cerro Verde operation in South America.Peru.


Our results for 2021 reflect strong operating and financial performance, and cash flow generation. We believe thatremained focused on cost and capital management and advanced our sustainability objectives. Despite continued challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we haveachieved a high-quality portfolio19 percent increase in copper sales volumes and a 59 percent increase in gold sales volumes in 2021, compared with 2020. During 2022, we expect to grow production and sales volumes while continuing to execute our operating plans, which we expect will provide strong cash flows to support advancement of long-lived copper assets positionedorganic growth initiatives and continue cash returns to generate long-term value. We have commencedshareholders under our established financial policy, based on a projectfavorable operational and market outlook.

In February 2021, our Board of Directors (Board) adopted a financial policy for the allocation of cash flows aligned with our strategic objectives of maintaining a strong balance sheet and increasing cash returns to developshareholders while advancing opportunities for future growth. Following achievement of our net debt target in the Lone Star oxide ores nearrange of $3.0 billion to $4.0 billion (excluding debt for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia), we announced in November 2021 the Safford operationimplementation of a performance-based payout framework, including the commencement of a new $3.0 billion share repurchase program (through February 15, 2022, we acquired 18.2 million shares of our common stock for a
70

total cost of $710 million, $39.10 per share) and expected base and variable dividends on common stock totaling $0.60 per share for 2022. Our Board will review the structure and the amount of the performance-based payout framework at least annually. Refer to Note 10 and “Capital Resources and Liquidity” for further discussion of our financial policy.

As further discussed in eastern Arizona, and PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI) has several projects in“Operations,” highlights during 2021 include:
The successful ramp-up of underground mining at the Grasberg minerals district, relatedachieving quarterly copper and gold volumes in the fourth quarter approximating 100 percent of the projected annualized levels.
Operations at the Lone Star copper leach project at our Safford mine exceeded initial design capacity of 200 million pounds of copper annually and produced approximately 235 million pounds of copper.
Cerro Verde's concentrator facilities milling rates averaged 380,300 metric tons of ore per day, compared with 331,600 metric tons of ore per day in 2020. Subject to the developmentongoing monitoring of its large-scale, long-lived, high-grade undergroundCOVID-19 protocols, Cerro Verde is targeting milling rates to increase to approximately 400,000 metric tons of ore bodies (referper day during 2022.
Advancement of several initiatives to “Operations - Indonesia Mining” for further discussion of PT-FI’s transition miningrecover additional copper from the open pit to underground). We are also pursuing other opportunities to enhance our mines’ net present values,large existing leach stockpiles across our North America and we continue to advance studies for future development of our copper resources, the timing ofSouth America operations, which will be dependent on market conditions.incorporate new applications, technologies and data analytics currently being developed.


Net income (loss) attributable to common stock totaled $2.6$4.3 billion in 2018, $1.8 billion2021 and $599 million in 2017 and $(4.2) billion in 2016.2020. Our results in 2018,2021, compared to 2017, benefited from2020, primarily reflect increased copper and gold volumes and higher copper and gold sales volumes, higher gains on sales of assets and lower adjustments to environmental obligations,molybdenum prices, partly offset by higher production and delivery costs and provision for income tax expense mostly at our international operations. Our results for the year 2016 were unfavorably impacted by charges of $5.4 billion at oil and gas operations primarily for the impairment of oil and gas properties, drillship settlements and contract termination costs.taxes. Refer to “Consolidated Results” for discussion of items impacting our consolidated results for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2018.2021.


At December 31, 2018,2021, we had $4.2consolidated debt of $9.5 billion inand consolidated cash and cash equivalents $11.1of $8.1 billion, resulting in totalnet debt of $1.4 billion. This represents a reduction in net debt of $4.7 billion from December 31, 2020. Refer to “Net Debt” for reconciliations of consolidated debt and consolidated cash and cash equivalents to net debt.

At December 31, 2021, we had no borrowings and approximately $3.5 billion available under our revolving credit facility.

As further discussedIn 2021, we redeemed all $524 million of our 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022 at a redemption price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Our next senior note maturity is in Note 2,March 2023, with redemption rights, at par, beginning in December 2018,2022. During 2021, we completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership. We expect our share of future cash flowsalso prepaid $200 million of the expanded PT-FI asset base, combined with the cash proceeds receivedCerro Verde Term Loan (the $325 million balance at December 31, 2021, matures in the transaction, to be comparable to our share of anticipated future cash flows under PT-FI’s former Contract of Work (COW) and joint venture arrangements with Rio Tinto plc (Rio Tinto Joint Venture)June 2022).

As a result of the transaction, PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium’s (Persero) (PT Inalum) and PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral’s (PTI - formerly known as PT Indocopper Investama) collective share ownership of PT-FI totals 51.24 percent and our share ownership is 48.76 percent. The arrangements provide for us and the other pre-transaction PT-FI shareholders to retain the economics of the revenue and cost sharing arrangements under the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture. As a result, our economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022.

We, PT-FI, PTI and PT Inalum also entered into a shareholders agreement, which governs certain matters with respect to the governance and management of PT-FI in connection with their ownership of shares in PT-FI, and establishes our control over the management of PT-FI's operations. Concurrent with closing the transaction, the Indonesian government granted PT-FI a new special mining license (IUPK) to replace its former COW, enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has

been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend mining rights through 2041, subject to PT-FI completing the construction of a new smelter in Indonesia within five years of closing the transaction and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the Indonesian government. Refer to Note 138 and “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,“Capital Resources and Liquidity” for further discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.discussion.


We have significant mineral reserves, mineral resources and future development opportunities within our portfolio of mining assets. At December 31, 2018,2021, our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves totaled 119.6107.2 billion pounds of copper, 30.827.1 million ounces of gold and 3.783.39 billion pounds of molybdenum. Refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates - Mineral Reserves” and Note 17 for further discussion.


During 2018,2021, production from our mines totaled 3.8 billion pounds of copper, 2.41.4 million ounces of gold and 9585 million pounds of molybdenum. Following is a summary of the geographic locationsan allocation of our consolidated copper, gold and molybdenum production in 2018:2021 by geographic location:
CopperGoldMolybdenum
North America38 %%76 %a
South America27 — 24 
Indonesia35 99 — 
100 %100 %100 %
 Copper Gold Molybdenum 
North America37% 1% 71%
a 
South America33
 
 29
 
Indonesia30
 99
 
 
 100% 100% 100% 
a.Our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines produced 37 percent of consolidated molybdenum production, and our North America copper mines produced 34 percent.

a.Our North America copper mines produced 40 percent of consolidated molybdenum production, and our Henderson and Climax molybdenum mines produced 36 percent.
Copper production from the Grasberg open-pit mine in Indonesia, Morenci mine in North America, and Cerro Verde mine in Peru and the Grasberg minerals district in Indonesia together totaled 7674 percent of our consolidated copper production in 2018.2021.


71

OUTLOOK


We continue to view the long-term outlook for our business positively, supported by expected rising demand associated with limitations on supplies of copper, the global economic recovery and by the requirements for copper in the world’s economy.infrastructure development and new demand associated with clean energy. Our financial results vary as a result of fluctuations in market prices primarily for copper, gold and, to a lesser extent, molybdenum, as well as other factors. World market prices for these commodities have fluctuated historically and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. Refer to “Markets” for further discussion. Because we cannot control the price of our products, the key measures that management focuses on in operating our business are sales volumes, unit net cash costs, operating cash flowflows and capital expenditures.


Sales Volumes  
Following are our projected consolidated sales volumes for 2019 (which reflects a transition year)2022 and actual consolidated sales volumes for 2018:2021:
20222021
(Projected)(Actual)
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds):
   
North America copper mines1,550  1,436 
South America mining1,180  1,055 
Indonesia mining1,570  1,316 
Total4,300 3,807 
   
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
1,580  1,360 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
80 a82 
 2019 2018 
 (Projected) (Actual) 
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds):
    
North America copper mines1,400
 1,428
 
South America mining1,270
 1,253
 
Indonesia mining615
 1,130
 
Total3,285
 3,811
 
     
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
785
 2,389
 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
94
a 
94
 
a.Projected molybdenum sales include 35 million pounds produced by our Molybdenum mines and 59 million pounds produced by our North America and South America copper mines.

a.Includes 50 million pounds from our North America and South America copper mines and 30 million pounds from our Molybdenum mines.


Consolidated sales for first-quarter 20192022 are expected to approximate 825970 million pounds of copper, 255380 thousand ounces of gold and 2420 million pounds of molybdenum. As PT-FI transitions mining from the open pit to underground, its production is expected to be significantly lower in 2019 and 2020, compared to 2018. Metal production is expected to improve significantly by 2021 following a ramp-up period. Projected sales volumes for the year 2019 are dependent on operational performance, weather-related conditions, timing of shipments and other factors. For other important factors that could cause results to differ materially from projections, refer to “Cautionary Statement,”Statement” below and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Consolidated Unit Net Cash Costs
Assuming average prices of $1,300$1,800 per ounce of gold and $12.00$19.00 per pound of molybdenum for 2019 and achievement of current sales volume and cost estimates, consolidated unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our copper mines are expected to average $1.73$1.35 per pound of copper in 2019.2022. The impact of price changes on 20192022 consolidated unit net cash costs would approximate $0.01$0.03 per pound for each $50$100 per ounce change in the average price of gold and $0.03$0.02 per pound for each $2$2 per pound change in the average price of molybdenum. Quarterly unit net cash costs vary with fluctuations in sales volumes and realized prices, primarily for gold and molybdenum. Refer to “Consolidated Results – Production and Delivery Costs” for further discussion of consolidated production costs for our mining operations.


Consolidated Operating Cash FlowFlows
Our consolidated operating cash flows vary with sales volumes,volumes; prices realized from copper, gold and molybdenum sales,sales; production costs,costs; income taxes,taxes; other working capital changeschanges; and other factors. Based on current sales volume and cost estimates, and assuming average prices of $2.75$4.50 per pound of copper, $1,300$1,800 per ounce of gold and $12.00$19.00 per pound of molybdenum, our consolidated operating cash flows are estimated to approximate $1.8$8.0 billion (net of $0.2$1.3 billion inof working capital and other uses, and timing of othermostly for income tax payments) for the year 2019.2022. Estimated consolidated operating cash flows in 20192022 also reflect a projected income tax provision of $0.5$3.2 billion (refer to “Consolidated Results - Income Taxes” for further discussion of our projected income tax rate for the year 2019)2022). The impact of price changes during 20192022 on operating cash flows would approximate $315$365 million for each $0.10 per pound change in the average price of copper, $40$100 million for each $50$100 per ounce change in the average price of gold and $130$110 million for each $2 per pound change in the average price of molybdenum.



72

Consolidated Capital Expenditures
Consolidated capitalCapital expenditures for the year 2022 are expected to approximate $2.4$4.7 billion, in 2019,$3.3 billion excluding the greenfield smelter and precious metals refinery (PMR) (collectively, the Indonesia smelter projects discussed below), including $1.5$2.0 billion for major mining projects ($1.4 billion for planned major projects primarily related to development activities associated with the Grasberg Block Cave and Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) underground development activitiesmines and $0.6 billion for discretionary growth projects).

Capital expenditures for the Indonesia smelter projects are expected to approximate $1.4 billion for the year 2022. Development of additional smelting capacity in Indonesia will result in the Grasberg minerals district and developmentelimination of export duties, providing an offset to the Lone Star oxide project.economic cost associated with the Indonesia smelter projects.

MARKETS


World prices for copper, gold and molybdenum can fluctuate significantly. During the period from January 20092012 through December 2018,2021, the London Metal Exchange (LME) copper settlement price varied from a low of $1.38$1.96 per pound in 20092016 to a record high of $4.60$4.86 per pound in 2011;2021; the London Bullion Market Association (London) PM gold price fluctuated from a low of $810$1,049 per ounce in 20092015 to a record high of $1,895$2,067 per ounce in 2011,2020, and the Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide weekly average price ranged from a low of $4.46$4.46 per pound in 2015 to a high of $18.60$20.01 per pound in 2010.2021. Copper, gold and molybdenum prices are affected by numerous factors beyond our control as described further in ourItem 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

copper.jpg

fcx-20211231_g16.jpg
This graph presents LME copper settlement prices and the combined reported stocks of copper at the LME, Commodity Exchange Inc., a division of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), and the Shanghai Futures Exchange from January 20092012 through December 2018. Beginning in mid-2014, copper prices declined because of concerns about slowing growth rates in China, a stronger United States (U.S.) dollar and a broad-based decline in commodity prices, but improved throughout 2017. Beginning in second-quarter 2018, copper prices declined in response to global trade actions initiated by the U.S., lower economic growth in China and globally, and concerns about rising interest rates and a stronger U.S. dollar.2021. For the year 2018,2021, LME copper settlement prices ranged from a low of $2.64$3.52 per pound to a record high of $3.29$4.86 per pound, averaged $2.96$4.23 per pound and closed at $2.71$4.40 per pound on December 31, 2018.2021. Copper prices have been supported by strong demand during the pandemic recovery, rising investor sentiment associated with copper’s prominent role in the global transition to cleaner energy, ongoing supply disruptions and falling inventories. The LME copper settlement price was $2.79$4.36 per pound on January 31, 2019.2022.


73

Long-term fundamentals for copper remain positive. We believe the underlying long-term fundamentals of the copper business remain positive,future demand will be supported by the significantcopper’s role of copper in the global economytransition to renewable power, electric vehicles and a challenging long-term supply environment attributable to difficultyother carbon-reduction initiatives, and continued urbanization in replacing existing large mines’ output with new production sources. Future copper prices aredeveloping countries. The small number of approved, large-scale projects beyond those expected to be volatilecommence operations in 2022 and are likely2023, the long lead times required to be influenced by demand from Chinapermit and emerging markets, as well as economic activity in the U.S. and other industrialized countries, the timing of the development ofbuild new supplies of copper and production levels of mines and copper smelters.declining ore grades at existing operations continue to highlight the fundamental supply challenges for copper.

fcx-20211231_g17.jpg
gold.jpg

This graph presents London PM gold prices from January 20092012 through December 2018. An improving economic outlook, stronger U.S. dollar and positive equity performance contributed to lower demand for gold since 2014. During 2018,2021. For the year 2021, London PM gold prices ranged from a low of $1,178$1,684 per ounce to a high of $1,355$1,943 per ounce, averaged $1,268$1,799 per ounce and closed at $1,279$1,806 per ounce on December 28, 201830, 2021 (there was no London PM gold price quote on December 31, 20182021). While the global economic recovery has put downward pressure on gold prices, many analysts expect gold prices to remain supported by the effects of elevated debt levels associated with large pandemic-related stimulus efforts and historically low United States (U.S.). interest rates. The London PM gold price was $1,323$1,795 per ounce on January 31, 2019.2022.


moly.jpg
74


fcx-20211231_g18.jpg
This graph presents the Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide weekly average price from January 20092012 through December 2018. Molybdenum prices have declined beginning in mid-2014 because of weaker demand from global steel and stainless steel producers, but rebounded starting in 2016. During 2018,2021. For the year 2021, the weekly average price for molybdenum ranged from a low of $10.67$10.09 per pound to a high of $12.97$20.01 per pound, averaged $11.93$15.92 per pound and was $11.88$18.70 per pound on December 31, 2018.2021. Molybdenum prices have risen in reaction to supply constraints and increased demand, as mines in both Chile and Peru reported lower production, and logistics challenges continued globally. The Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide weekly average price was $10.95$19.12 per pound on January 31, 2019.2022.



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES


MD&A is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the U.S. The preparation of these statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on historical experience and on assumptions that we consider reasonable under the circumstances; however, reported results could differ from those based on the current estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The areas requiring the use of management’s estimates are also discussed in Note 1 under the subheading “Use of Estimates.” Management has reviewed the following discussion of its development and selection of critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (the Board).Board.


Mineral ReservesTaxes
Recoverable proven and probable reserves are the part of a mineral deposit that can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The determination of reserves involves numerous uncertainties with respect to the ultimate geology of the ore bodies, including quantities, grades and recovery rates. Estimating the quantity and grade of mineral reserves requires us to determine the size, shape and depth of our ore bodies by analyzing geological data, such as samplings of drill holes, tunnels and other underground workings. In addition to the geology of our mines, assumptions are required to determine the economic feasibility of mining these reserves, including estimates of future commodity prices and demand, the mining methods we use and the related costs incurred to develop and mine our reserves. Our estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves are prepared by and are the responsibility of our employees. A majority of these estimates are reviewed annually and verified by independent experts in mining, geology and reserve determination.

At December 31, 2018,preparing our consolidated estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves were assessed using long-term pricesfinancial statements, we estimate the actual amount of $2.50 per pound for copper in North America and South America and $2.00 per pound of copper in Indonesia, $1,000 per ounce of gold and $10 per pound of molybdenum. Reserves for Indonesia would not significantly change if assessed under a long-term price of $2.50 per pound of copperincome taxes currently payable or receivable as PT-FI’s reserve plan is mill-constrained by the term of its IUPK, which contains rights to extend mining rights through 2041. The following table summarizes changes in our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable copper, gold and molybdenum reserves during 2018 and 2017:
  
Coppera
(billion
pounds)
 
Gold
(million
ounces)
 
Molybdenum
(billion
pounds)
 
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2016 86.8
 26.1
 2.95
 
Net additions (revisions) 3.6
 (1.0) (0.02) 
Production (3.7) (1.6) (0.09) 
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2017 86.7
 23.5
 2.84
 
PT-FI acquisition of Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest 13.0
 10.1
 
 
Other net additions (revisions) 23.7
b 
(0.4) 1.04
c 
Production (3.8) (2.4) (0.10) 
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2018 119.6
 30.8
 3.78
 
        
a.Includes estimated recoverable metals contained in stockpiles. See below for additional discussion of recoverable copper in stockpiles.
b.Primarily reflects an increase in the copper price assumption from $2.00 per pound to $2.50 per pound for determining reserves in North America and South America.
c.Primarily reflects an increase in molybdenum reserves at North America copper mines and the Cerro Verde mine in Peru.

Refer to Note 20 and “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for further information regarding, and risks associated with, our estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves.

As discussed in Note 1, we depreciate our life-of-mine mining and millingwell as deferred income tax assets and values assignedliabilities attributable to proventemporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and probable mineral reservesliabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the unit-of-production (UOP) method based on our estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves. Because the economic assumptions usedenacted tax rates expected to estimate mineral reserves may change from periodapply to period and additional geological data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of reserves may change, which could have a significant impact on our results of operations, including changes to prospective depreciation rates and impairments of long-lived asset carrying values. Excluding impacts associated

with changestaxable income in the levels of finished goods inventories and based on projected copper sales volumes, if estimated copper reserves at our mines were 10 percent higher at December 31, 2018, we estimate that our annual depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense for 2019 would decrease by $44 million ($22 million to net income attributable to common stock), and a 10 percent decreaseyears in copper reserves would increase DD&A expense by $53 million ($26 million to net income attributable to common stock). We perform annual assessments of our existing assets in connection with the review of mine operating and development plans. If it is determined that assigned asset lives do not reflect the expected remaining period of benefit, any change could affect prospective DD&A rates.

As discussed below and in Note 1, we review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable, and changes to our estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves could have an impact on our assessment of asset recoverability.

Recoverable Copper in Stockpiles
We record, as inventory, applicable costs for copper contained in mill and leach stockpiles thatwhich these temporary differences are expected to be processedrecovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or laws is recognized in income in the future based on proven processing technologies. Millperiod in which such changes are enacted.


75

Our operations are in multiple jurisdictions where uncertainties arise in the application of complex tax regulations. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, while others are defined by general tax laws and leach stockpilesregulations. We and our subsidiaries are evaluated periodicallysubject to ensure that they are stated atreviews of our income tax filings and other tax payments, and disputes can arise with the lowertaxing authorities over the interpretation of weighted-average costour contracts or net realizable value (referlaws. During 2021, PT-FI recorded charges to Note 4 and “Consolidated Results”provision for further discussion of inventory adjustments recorded for the three years ended December 31, 2018). Accounting for recoverable copper from mill and leach stockpiles represents a critical accounting estimate because (i) it is impracticable to determine copper containedincome taxes totaling $186 million associated with historical contested tax matters in mill and leach stockpiles by physical count, thus requiring management to employ reasonable estimation methods and (ii) recovery rates from leach stockpiles can vary significantly.Indonesia. Refer to Note 111 for further discussion of our accounting policy for recoverable copper in stockpiles.discussion.

At December 31, 2018, estimated consolidated recoverable copper was 2.0 billion pounds in leach stockpiles (with a carrying value of $2.2 billion) and 0.6 billion pounds in mill stockpiles (with a carrying value of $0.5 billion).

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
As discussed in Note 1,11, we assessoperate in the carrying valuesU.S. and multiple international tax jurisdictions, and our income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities in those jurisdictions who may challenge any tax position on these returns. Uncertainty in a tax position may arise because tax laws are subject to interpretation. We use significant judgment to (1) determine whether, based on the technical merits, a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained and (2) measure the amount of our long-lived miningtax benefit that qualifies for recognition.

We have uncertain tax positions related to income tax assessments in Indonesia and Peru, including penalties and interest, which have not been recorded at December 31, 2021. Final taxes paid may be dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities. In certain jurisdictions, we pay a portion of the disputed amount before formally appealing an assessment. Such payment is recorded as a receivable if we believe the amount is collectible. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.

A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred income tax assets when events or changes in circumstances indicatefor which the weight of available evidence suggests that the related carrying amounts of such assets maybenefits will not be recoverable.realized. In evaluating our long-lived mining assets for recoverability,determining the amount of the valuation allowance, we use estimates of pre-tax undiscountedconsider estimated future cash flowstaxable income or loss as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction. If we determine that we will not realize all or a portion of our individual mines. Estimates of future cash flows are derived from current business plans, which are developed using near-term metal price forecasts reflectivedeferred income tax assets, we will increase our valuation allowance. Conversely, if we determine that we will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the current price environmentrelated benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced.

Our valuation allowances totaled $4.1 billion at December 31, 2021, which covered all of our U.S. foreign tax credits and management’s projections for long-term average metal prices. In addition to near-U.S. federal net operating losses (NOLs), substantially all of our U.S. state NOLs, and long-term metal price assumptions, other key assumptions include estimatesa portion of commodity-based and other input costs; proven and probable mineral reserves estimates, including the timing and cost to develop and produce the reserves; value beyond proven and probable mineral reserve estimates (referour foreign NOLs. During 2021, valuation allowances decreased by $645 million. Refer to Note 1); and the use of appropriate discount rates in the measurement of fair value. We believe our estimates and models used to determine fair value are similar to what a market participant would use. As quoted market prices are unavailable11 for our individual mining operations, fair value is determined through the use of after-tax discounted estimated future cash flows.further discussion.


For the three years ended December 31, 2018, we concluded there were no events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that the carrying amount of our long-lived mining assets might not be recoverable.

In addition to decreases in future metal price assumptions, other events that could result in future impairment of our long-lived mining assets include, but are not limited to, decreases in estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves and any event that might otherwise have a material adverse effect on mine site production levels or costs. Refer to “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Environmental Obligations
Our current and historical operating activities are subject to various national, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern the protection of the environment, and compliance with those laws requires significant expenditures. Environmental expenditures are charged to expense or capitalized, depending upon their future economic benefits. The guidance provided by U.S. GAAP requires that liabilities for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that obligations have been incurred, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2018,2021, environmental obligations recorded in our consolidated balance sheet totaled $1.5$1.7 billion,, which reflect obligations for environmental liabilities attributed to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) or analogous state programs and for estimated future costs associated with environmental matters. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and Notes 1 and 12 for further discussion of environmental obligations, including a summary of changes in our estimated environmental obligations for the three years ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Accounting for environmental obligations represents a critical accounting estimate because (i) changes to environmental laws and regulations and/or circumstances affecting our operations could result in significant changes to our estimates, which could have a significant impact on our results of operations, (ii) we will not incur most of these costs for a number of years, requiring us to make estimates over a long period, (iii) calculating the discounted cash flows for certain of our environmental obligations requires management to estimate the amounts and timing of projected cash flows and make long-term assumptions about inflation rates and (iv) changes in estimates used in determining our environmental obligations could have a significant impact on our results of operations.


76

We perform a comprehensive annual review of our environmental obligations and also review changes in facts and circumstances associated with these obligations at least quarterly. Judgments and estimates are based upon currently available facts, existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, remediation experience, whether or not we are a potentially responsible party (PRP), the ability of other PRPs to pay their allocated portions and take into consideration reasonably possible outcomes. Our cost estimates can change substantially as additional information becomes available regarding the nature or extent of site contamination, updated cost assumptions (including increases and decreases to cost estimates), changes in the anticipated scope and timing of remediation activities, the settlement of environmental matters, required remediation methods and actions by or against governmental agencies or private parties.


Asset Retirement Obligations
We record the fair value of our estimated asset retirement obligations (AROs) associated with tangible long-lived assets in the period incurred. Fair value is measured as the present value of cash flow estimates after considering inflation and a market risk premium. Our cost estimates are reflected on a third-party cost basis and comply with our legal obligation to retire tangible long-lived assets in the period incurred. These cost estimates may differ from financial assurance cost estimates for reclamation activities because of a variety of factors, including obtaining updated cost estimates for reclamation activities, the timing of reclamation activities, changes in scope and the exclusion of certain costs not considered reclamation and closure costs. At December 31, 2018,2021, AROs recorded in our consolidated balance sheet totaled $2.5$2.7 billion, including $0.5$0.3 billion associated with our remaining oil and gas operations. In 2021, primarily because of safety constraints and other concerns regarding our reclamation activities associated with an overburden stockpile at our Indonesia operations, we recorded a $397 million adjustment to our Indonesia AROs. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and to Notes 1 and 12 for further discussion of reclamation and closure costs, including a summary of changes in our AROs for the three years ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Generally, ARO activities are specified by regulations or in permits issued by the relevant governing authority, and managementmanagement’s judgment is required to estimate the extent and timing of expenditures. Accounting for AROs represents a critical accounting estimate because (i) we will not incur most of these costs for a number of years, requiring us to make estimates over a long period, (ii) reclamation and closure laws and regulations could change in the future and/or circumstances affecting our operations could change, either of which could result in significant changes to our current plans, (iii) the methods used or required to plug and abandon non-producing oil and gas wellbores, remove platforms, tanks, production equipment and flow lines, and restore the wellsite could change, (iv) calculating the fair value of our AROs requires management to estimate projected cash flows, make long-term assumptions about inflation rates, determine our credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rates and determine market risk premiums that are appropriate for our operations and (v) given the magnitude of our estimated reclamation, mine closure and wellsite abandonment and restoration costs, changes in any or all of these estimates could have a significant impact on our results of operations.


TaxesMineral Reserves
Recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves were determined from the application of relevant modifying factors to geological data, in order to establish an operational, economically viable mine plan and have been prepared in accordance with the disclosure requirements of subpart 1300 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K. The determination of mineral reserves involves numerous uncertainties with respect to the ultimate geology of the ore bodies, including quantities, grades and recoveries. Estimating the quantity and grade of mineral reserves requires us to determine the size, shape and depth of our ore bodies by analyzing geological data, such as samplings of drill holes, tunnels and other underground workings. In preparingaddition to the geology of our mines, assumptions are required to determine the economic feasibility of mining these reserves, including estimates of future commodity prices and demand, the mining methods we use and the related costs incurred to develop and mine our mineral reserves. Our estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves are prepared by and are the responsibility of our employees. These estimates are reviewed and verified regularly by independent experts in mining, geology and reserve determination.


77

Our consolidated estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves shown below were assessed using long-term price assumptions of $2.50 per pound for copper, $1,200 per ounce of gold and $10 per pound of molybdenum. The following table summarizes changes in our estimated consolidated recoverable proven and probable copper, gold and molybdenum mineral reserves during 2020 and 2021:
Coppera
(billion
pounds)
Gold
(million
ounces)
Molybdenum
(billion
pounds)
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2019116.0 29.6 3.58 
Net additions0.4 0.2 0.21 
Production(3.2)(0.9)(0.08)
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2020113.2 28.9 3.71 
Net revisions(2.2)(0.4)(0.24)
Production(3.8)(1.4)(0.08)
Consolidated reserves at December 31, 2021107.2 27.1 3.39 
a.Includes estimated recoverable metals contained in stockpiles. See below for additional discussion of recoverable copper in stockpiles.

Refer to Note 17, and Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual consolidated financial statements,report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for further information regarding, and risks associated with, our estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves.

As discussed in Note 1, we depreciate our life-of-mine mining and milling assets and values assigned to proven and probable mineral reserves using the unit-of-production (UOP) method based on our estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves. Because the economic assumptions used to estimate mineral reserves may change from period to period and additional geological data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of mineral reserves may change, which could have a significant impact on our results of operations, including changes to prospective depreciation rates and impairments of long-lived asset carrying values. Based on projected copper sales volumes, if estimated copper reserves at our mines were 10 percent higher at December 31, 2021, we estimate that our annual depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense for 2022 would decrease by approximately $50 million (approximately $30 million to net income attributable to common stock), and a 10 percent decrease in copper reserves would increase DD&A expense by approximately $165 million (approximately $85 million to net income attributable to common stock). We perform annual assessments of our existing assets in connection with the actualreview of mine operating and development plans. If it is determined that assigned asset lives do not reflect the expected remaining period of benefit, any change could affect prospective DD&A rates.

As discussed below and in Note 1, we review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount of income taxes currently payable or receivablesuch assets may not be recoverable, and changes to our estimates of recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves could have an impact on our assessment of asset recoverability.

Recoverable Copper in Stockpiles
We record, as well as deferred income tax assetsinventory, applicable costs for copper contained in mill and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differencesleach stockpiles that are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or laws is recognized in incomeprocessed in the periodfuture based on proven processing technologies. Mill and leach stockpiles are evaluated periodically to ensure that they are stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value (refer to Note 4 and “Consolidated Results” for further discussion of inventory adjustments recorded for the three years ended December 31, 2021). Accounting for recoverable copper from mill and leach stockpiles represents a critical accounting estimate because (i) it is impracticable to determine copper contained in which such changes are enacted.

Our operations are in multiple jurisdictions where uncertainties arise in the application of complex tax regulations. Some of these tax regimes are definedmill and leach stockpiles by contractual agreements with the local government, while others are defined by general tax lawsphysical count, thus requiring management to employ reasonable estimation methods and regulations. We and our subsidiaries are subject(ii) recoveries from leach stockpiles can vary significantly. Refer to reviewsNote 1 for further discussion of our income tax filingsaccounting policy for recoverable copper in stockpiles.

At December 31, 2021, estimated consolidated recoverable copper was 1.8 billion pounds in leach stockpiles (with a carrying value of $2.1 billion) and other tax payments, and disputes can arise with0.3 billion pounds in mill stockpiles (with a carrying value of $0.4 billion).


78

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
As discussed in Note 1, we assess the taxing authorities over the interpretationcarrying values of our contractslong-lived mining assets when events or laws. Final taxes paid may be dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities. In certain jurisdictions, we must pay a portion of the disputed amount to the local governmentchanges in order to formally appeal an assessment. Such payment is recorded as a receivable if we believe the amount is collectible.

A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred income tax assets for which the weight of available evidence suggestscircumstances indicate that the related benefits willcarrying amounts of such assets may not be realized.recoverable. In determining the amountevaluating our long-lived mining assets for recoverability, we use estimates of pre-tax undiscounted future cash flows of our mines.

Estimates of future cash flows are derived from current business plans, which are developed using near-term metal price forecasts reflective of the valuation allowance, we considercurrent price environment and management’s projections for long-term average metal prices. In addition to near- and long-term metal price assumptions, other key assumptions include estimates of commodity-based and other input costs; proven and probable mineral reserves estimates, including the timing and cost to develop and produce the mineral reserves; value beyond proven and probable mineral reserve estimates (refer to Note 1); and the use of appropriate discount rates in the measurement of fair value. We believe our estimates and models used to determine fair value are similar to what a market participant would use. As quoted market prices are unavailable for our individual mining operations, fair value is determined through the use of after-tax discounted estimated future taxable income or loss as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction. If we determine that we will not realize all or a portioncash flows.

During the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, no material impairments of our deferredlong-lived mining assets were recorded.

In addition to decreases in future metal price assumptions, other events that could result in future impairment of our long-lived mining assets include, but are not limited to, decreases in estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves and any event that might otherwise have a material adverse effect on mine site production levels or costs. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
 Years Ended December 31,
 2021 2020 
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Revenuesa,b
$22,845 $14,198 
Operating incomea
$8,366 

$2,437 

Net income attributable to common stockc
$4,306 d$599 e
Diluted net income per share attributable to common stock$2.90 d$0.41 e
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding1,482  1,461  
Operating cash flowsf
$7,715 $3,017 
Capital expenditures$2,115 $1,961 
At December 31:
Cash and cash equivalents$8,068 $3,657 
Total debt, including current portion$9,450 $9,711 
a.Refer to Note 16 for a summary of revenues and operating income by operating division.
b.Includes adjustments to embedded derivatives for provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales (refer to Note 14).
c.We defer recognizing profits on intercompany sales until final sales to third parties occur. Refer to “Operations - Smelting & Refining” for a summary of net impacts from changes in these deferrals.
d.Includes net charges in 2021 totaling $331 million ($0.22 per share), primarily associated with net adjustments to AROs mostly at PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI), historical contested tax assets, we will increase our valuation allowance. Conversely, if we determine that we will ultimately be able to realize all or a portionmatters at PT-FI (including historical tax audits and an administrative fine levied by the Indonesia government) and nonrecurring labor-related charges for labor agreements at Cerro Verde, partly offset by the release of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided,on NOLs at PT-FI’s subsidiary, a gain on the sale of Freeport Cobalt, refunds of Arizona transaction privilege taxes related to purchased electricity and favorable adjustments to prior-years’ profit sharing at Cerro Verde.
e.Includes net charges in 2020 totaling $191 million ($0.13 per share), primarily associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and revised operating plans (including employee separation costs), a framework for the resolution of all orcurrent and future potential talc-related litigation, net losses on early extinguishment of debt, metals inventory adjustments and historical contested tax audits at PT-FI. These charges were partly offset primarily by a portiongain on the sale of our interests in the Kisanfu exploration project.
f.Working capital and other sources totaled $755 million in 2021 and $665 million in 2020.
79

Years Ended December 31,
2021 2020
SUMMARY OPERATING DATA    
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
    
Production3,843 3,206 
Sales, excluding purchases3,807 3,202 
Average realized price per pound$4.33 $2.95 
Site production and delivery costs per pounda
$1.93 $1.88 
Unit net cash costs per pounda
$1.34 $1.48 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
    
Production1,381 857 
Sales, excluding purchases1,360 855 
Average realized price per ounce$1,796 $1,832 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
    
Production85 76 
Sales, excluding purchases82 80 
Average realized price per pound$15.56 $10.20 
a.Reflects per pound weighted-average production and delivery costs and unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for all copper mines, before net noncash and other costs. For reconciliations of the related valuation allowance will be reduced.per pound unit costs by operating division to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements, refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs.”

Our valuation allowances totaled $4.5 billion at December 31, 2018, which covered all of our U.S. foreign tax credits, U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards, foreign net operating loss carryforwards, and substantially all of our U.S. state net operating losses. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
 
Revenuesa,b
$18,628
 $16,403
 $14,830
c 
Operating income (loss)a,d,e
$4,754
f,g 
$3,690
h 
$(2,729)
i 
Net income (loss) from continuing operationsj,k,l
$2,909
m,n 
$2,029
n 
$(3,832) 
Net (loss) income from discontinued operationso
$(15) $66
 $(193) 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock$2,602
 $1,817
 $(4,154)
p 
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stock:      
Continuing operations$1.79
 $1.21
 $(2.96) 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20) 
 $1.78
 $1.25
 $(3.16) 
       
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding1,458
 1,454
 1,318
 
Operating cash flowsq
$3,863
 $4,666
 $3,737
 
Capital expenditures$1,971
 $1,410
 $2,813
 
At December 31:      
Cash and cash equivalents$4,217
 $4,526
 $4,262
 
Total debt, including current portion$11,141
 $13,229
 $16,126
 
a.Refer to Note 16 for a summary of revenues and operating income by operating division.
b.Includes adjustments to embedded derivatives for provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales (refer to Note 14).
c.Includes net noncash mark-to-market losses associated with crude oil and natural gas derivative contracts totaling $41 million ($41 million to net loss attributable to common stock or $0.03 per share). Refer to Note 14 for further discussion.
d.Includes net gains on sales of assets totaling $208 million ($208 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.14 per share) in 2018, $81 million ($81 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.06 per share) in 2017 and $649 million ($649 million to net loss attributable to common stockholders or $0.49 per share) in 2016. Refer to Note 2 and “Net Gain on Sales of Assets” below for further discussion.
e.Includes net charges (credits) for adjustments to environmental obligations and related litigation reserves of $57 million ($57 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.04 per share) in 2018, $210 million ($210 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.14 per share) in 2017 and $(16) million ($(16) million to net loss attributable to common stock or $(0.01) per share) in 2016.
f.The year 2018 includes net charges of $112 million ($52 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.04 per share) consisting of $69 million for Cerro Verde’s new three-year collective labor agreement (CLA) and $43 million mostly associated with depreciation expense at Freeport Cobalt for the period December 2016 through December 2017, which was suspended while it was classified as held for sale.
g.
The year 2018 also includes net charges at PT-FI of $223 million($110 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.08 per share) consisting of $69 million for surface water tax disputes with the local regional tax authority in Papua,Indonesia,$32 million for assessments of prior period permit fees with Indonesia's Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MOEF), $72 million for disputed payroll withholding taxes for prior years and other tax settlements, and $62 million to write-off certain previously capitalized project costs for the new smelter in Indonesia, partly offset by inventory adjustments totaling $12 million.

h.The year 2017 includes net charges of $149 million ($93 to net income attributable to common stock or $0.06 per share) mostly associated with workforce reductions at PT-FI.
i.The year 2016 also includes charges of $5.5 billion ($5.5 billion to net loss attributable to common stockholders or $4.16 per share) consisting of (i) $4.3 billion to reduce the carrying value of oil and gas properties pursuant to full cost accounting rules, (ii) $1.1 billion of other net oil and gas charges, primarily for drillship settlements/idle rig costs, the termination of contracts for support vessels and equipment, inventory adjustments, asset impairment and restructuring charges, and (iii) $69 million of net charges at mining operations primarily reflecting inventory adjustments, PT-FI asset retirement and Cerro Verde social commitments.
j.
Includes net gains on early extinguishment and exchanges of debt totaling $7 million (less than $0.01 per share) in2018,$21 million ($0.01 per share) in 2017 and $26 million ($0.02 per share) in 2016. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion.
k.Includes net tax credits of $632 million ($574 million net of noncontrolling interests or $0.39 per share) in 2018, $438 million ($0.30 per share) in 2017 and $370 million ($374 million net of noncontrolling interests or $0.28 per share) in 2016. Refer to “Income Taxes” below for further discussion.
l.We defer recognizing profits on intercompany sales until final sales to third parties occur. Refer to “Operations - Smelting & Refining” for a summary of net impacts from changes in these deferrals.
m.Includes interest received on tax refunds totaling $30 million ($19 million to net income attributable to common stock or $0.01 per share), mostly associated with the refund of PT-FI’s prior years’ tax receivables.
n.
Includes net charges associated with disputed Cerro Verde royalties for prior years of $195 million to net income attributable to common stock ($0.13 per share) in 2018 and $186 million to net income attributable to common stock ($0.13 per share) in 2017. Net charges for the year 2018 consist of charges to production and delivery costs ($14 million), interest expense ($370 million) and other expense ($22 million), net of income tax benefits ($35 million) and noncontrolling interests ($176 million). Net charges for the year 2017 primarily reflect charges to production and delivery ($203 million), interest expense ($145 million) and income taxes ($7 million), net of noncontrolling interests ($169 million). Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
o.Primarily reflects adjustments to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration related to the November 2016 sale of our interest in TFHL, which will continue to be adjusted through December 31, 2019.
p.Includes a gain on redemption of noncontrolling interest of $199 million ($0.15 per share) for the settlement of a preferred stock obligation. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
q.Includes net working capital (uses) sources and timing of other tax payments of $(0.6) billion in 2018, $0.6 billion in 2017 and $87 million in 2016.
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 
2016a
 
SUMMARY OPERATING DATA      
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
      
Production3,813
 3,737
 4,222
 
Sales, excluding purchases3,811
 3,700
 4,227
 
Average realized price per pound$2.91
 $2.93
 $2.28
 
Site production and delivery costs per poundb
$1.76
 $1.60
 $1.42
 
Unit net cash costs per poundb
$1.07
 $1.19
 $1.26
 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
      
Production2,439
 1,577
 1,088
 
Sales, excluding purchases2,389
 1,562
 1,079
 
Average realized price per ounce$1,254
 $1,268
 $1,238
 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
      
Production95
 92
 80
 
Sales, excluding purchases94
 95
 74
 
Average realized price per pound$12.50
 $9.33
 $8.33
 
a.Excludes results from the Tenke mine, which is reported as a discontinued operation.
b.Reflects per pound weighted-average production and delivery costs and unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for all copper mines, before net noncash and other costs. For reconciliations of the per pound unit costs by operating division to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements, refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs.”



Revenues
Consolidated revenues totaled $18.6$22.8 billion in 2018, $16.42021 and $14.2 billion in 2017 and $14.8 billion in 2016.2020. Our revenues primarily include the sale of copper concentrate, copper cathode, copper rod, gold in concentrate and molybdenum. Following is a summary of changes in our consolidated revenues between periodsfrom 2020 to 2021 (in millions):
Consolidated revenues - 2020$14,198 
Mining operations:
Higher sales volumes:
Copper1,784 
Gold925 
Molybdenum13 
Higher (lower) averaged realized prices:
Copper5,253 
Gold(48)
Molybdenum439 
Adjustments for prior year provisionally priced copper sales271 
Lower revenues from sales of purchased copper(64)
Higher Atlantic Copper revenues924 
Higher treatment charges(83)
Higher royalties and export duties(291)
Other, including intercompany eliminations(476)
Consolidated revenues - 2021$22,845 
 2018 2017 
     
Consolidated revenues - prior year$16,403
 $14,830
 
Mining operations:    
Higher (lower) sales volumes:    
Copper326
 (1,201) 
Gold1,049
 598
 
Molybdenum(9) 175
 
(Lower) higher averaged realized prices:    
Copper(76) 2,405
 
Gold(33) 47
 
Molybdenum299
 95
 
Adjustments for prior year provisionally priced copper sales(151) 76
 
Higher revenues from sales of purchased copper264
 361
 
Higher Atlantic Copper revenues270
 202
 
Higher royalties and export duties(130) (63) 
Lower oil sales volumes(17) (1,269) 
Other, including intercompany eliminations433
 147
 
Consolidated revenues - current year$18,628
 $16,403
 


Mining Operations
Sales Volumes. Higher copper sales volumes in 2018, compared to 2017, primarily reflect higher operating rates in Indonesia. Lower copper sales volumes in 2017, compared to 2016, primarily reflect lower sales volumes in North America mainly caused by lower ore grades.

Higher Copper and gold sales volumes were higher in 2018,2021, compared with 2017,to 2020, primarily reflect higher operating rates and ore gradesreflecting the ramp-up of underground mining at PT-FI. Higher gold sales volumes in 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflect higher ore grades at PT-FI.the Grasberg minerals district.

Consolidated molybdenum sales volumes in 2018 approximated 2017 sales volumes. Higher molybdenum sales volumes in 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflect increased demand and higher production.


Refer to “Operations” for further discussion of sales volumes at our mining operations.


Realized Prices. Our consolidated revenues can vary significantly as a result of fluctuations in the market prices of copper, gold and molybdenum. In 2018,2021, our average realized prices were 1 percent lower for copper and gold and 34 percent higher for molybdenum in 2018, compared with 2017. In 2017, our average realized prices were 2947 percent higher for copper, 2 percent higherlower for gold and 1253 percent higher for molybdenum, compared with 2016.2020.


80

Average realized copper prices include net favorable adjustments to current year provisionally priced copper sales (i.e., provisionally priced sales during the years 2021 and 2020) totaling $256 million for 2021 and $361 million for 2020. Refer to Note 14 for a summary of total adjustments to prior period and current period provisionally priced sales. As discussed below and in “Disclosures About Market Risks-CommodityRisks - Commodity Price Risk”,Risk,” substantially all of our copper concentrate and cathode sales contracts provide final copper pricing in a specified future month (generally one to four months from the shipment date). We record revenues and invoice customers at the time of shipment based on then-current LME prices, which results in an embedded derivative on provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales that is adjusted to fair value through earnings each period, using the period-end forward prices, until final pricing on the date of settlement. Average realizedTo the extent final prices are higher or lower than what was recorded on a provisional basis, an increase or decrease to revenues is recorded each reporting period until the date of final pricing. Accordingly, in times of rising copper prices, include netour revenues benefit from adjustments to current periodthe final pricing of provisionally priced sales pursuant to contracts entered into in prior periods; in times of falling copper prices, the opposite occurs.

Prior Year Provisionally Priced Copper Sales. Net favorable (unfavorable) adjustments to prior years’ provisionally priced copper sales totaling $(240)(i.e., provisionally priced copper sales at December 31, 2020 and 2019) recorded in consolidated revenues totaled $169 million in 2021 and $(102) million in 2020. Refer to “Disclosures About Market Risks - Commodity Price Risk” for 2018, $408 million for 2017further discussion of our provisionally priced copper sales, and $257 million for 2016. Refer to Note 14 for a summary of total adjustments to prior period and current period provisionally priced copper sales.


Prior Year Provisionally Priced Copper Sales. Net adjustments to prior years’ provisionally priced copper sales recorded in consolidated revenues totaled $(70) million in 2018, $81 million in 2017 and $5 million in 2016. Refer to Note 14 for a summary of total adjustments to prior period and current period provisionally priced sales.


Purchased Copper. Lower revenues associated with purchased copper in 2021, compared to 2020, primarily reflects lower volumes, partly offset by higher copper prices. We purchasepurchased copper cathode primarily for processing by our Rod & Refining operations. Purchased copper volumes totaled 356operations, totaling 173 million pounds in 2018, 2732021 and 290 million pounds in 2017 and 188 million pounds in 2016.2020.


Atlantic Copper Revenues.Atlantic Copper revenues totaled $2.3 billion in 2018, $2.0 billion in 2017 and $1.8 billion in 2016. Higher Atlantic Copper revenues in 2018,2021, compared with 2017,2020, primarily reflect higher copper prices.

Treatment Charges. Revenues from our concentrate sales are recorded net of treatment charges (i.e., fees paid to smelters that are generally negotiated annually), which will vary with the sales volumes and gold sales volumes. Higher Atlantic Copper revenues in 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflect higher copper prices.the price of copper.


Royalties and Export Duties. Primarily reflects royalties Royalties are primarily for sales from PT-FI that willand vary with the volume of metal sold and the prices of copper and gold. PT-FI also payswill continue to pay export duties until development progress for the new smelteradditional smelting capacity in Indonesia exceeds 50 percent. Refer to “Operations - Indonesia Mining” for further discussion of the current progress on additional smelting capacity in Indonesia and to Note 13 for a summary of PT-FI’s royalties and export duties.


Oil & Gas Operations
Oil sales volumes totaled 1.4 million barrels (MMBbls) in 2018, 1.8 MMBbls in 2017 and 34.4 MMBbls in 2016. During the three years ended December 31, 2018, we completed the sales of substantially all of our oil and gas properties. As a result, oil sales volumes have significantly declined in 2018 and 2017, compared to 2016.

Production and Delivery Costs
Consolidated production and delivery costs totaled $11.7$12.0 billion in 2018, $10.32021, compared with $10.0 billion in 2017 and $10.7 billion in 2016.2020. Higher consolidated production and delivery costs in 2018, compared2021 primarily reflect higher sales volumes, the ramp-up of underground mining at the Grasberg minerals district, higher milling rates at Cerro Verde associated with the return to 2017, primarily reflected higher mining and milling costs in North America and South Americapre-COVID-19 operating rates and higher copper purchasesmaintenance and input costs. The year 2021 includes net charges totaling $415 million primarily associated with an unfavorable ARO adjustment (refer to Note 12) and other net charges at our rodPT-FI and refining operations. Lowernonrecurring labor-related charges at Cerro Verde for collective labor agreements, partly offset by refunds of Arizona transaction privilege taxes related to purchased electricity and favorable adjustments to prior-years’ profit sharing at Cerro Verde. The year 2020 includes net charges totaling $252 million, primarily associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and revised operating plans (including employee separation costs). Refer to Note 16 for details of production and delivery costs in 2017, compared to 2016, primarily reflected lower costs related to our oil and gas operations because of the sale of substantially all of our oil and gas properties in late 2016.by operating segment.


The year 2018 included net charges at PT-FI totaling $223 million (refer to the “Summary Financial Data” table above for a summary of these charges) and charges at Cerro Verde totaling $69 million related to its new three-year CLA.

The year 2017 included charges totaling $203 million associated with disputed royalties at Cerro Verde for prior years and $120 million associated with workforce reductions at PT-FI.

The year 2016 included charges totaling $926 million associated with drillship settlements/idle rig and contract termination costs at U.S. oil and gas operations.

Mining Unit Site Production and Delivery Costs
Costs.Site production and delivery costs for our copper mining operations primarily include labor, energy and commodity-based inputs, such as sulphuricsulfuric acid, reagents, liners, tires and explosives. Consolidated unit site production and delivery costs (before net noncash and other costs) for our copper mines averaged $1.76$1.93 per pound of copper in 2018, $1.602021 and $1.88 per pound in 2017 and $1.42 per pound in 2016.2020. Higher consolidated unit site production and delivery costs in 2018,2021, compared with 2017,2020, primarily reflectedreflect higher mining and milling costs at our North America and South America mining operations as well as charges associated with Cerro Verde’s new three-year CLA. Higher consolidated unitramped-up operations and higher maintenance and input costs, partly offset by higher sales volumes. Consolidated site production and delivery costs in 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflected lower consolidated copper sales volumes and higher mining, milling and employee costsper pound for the year 2021 included nonrecurring labor-related charges at our South America mining operations.Cerro Verde for collective labor agreements. Refer to “Operations - Unit Net Cash Costs” for further discussion of unit net cash costs associated with our operating divisions, and to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for reconciliations of per pound costs by operating division to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements.

81

Our copper mining operations require significant amounts of energy, principally diesel, electricity, coal and natural gas, most of which is obtained from third parties under long-term contracts. Our take-or-pay contractual obligations for electricity totaled approximately $0.3 billion at December 31, 2021. We do not have take-or-pay contractual obligations for other energy commodities. Energy represented approximately 2021 percent of our copper mine site operating costs in 2018,2021, including purchases of approximately 220 million gallons of diesel fuel; 8,150approximately 8,000 gigawatt hours of electricity at our North America and South America copper mining operations (we generate all of our power at our Indonesia mining operation); 740approximately 750 thousand metric tons of coal for our coal power plant in Indonesia; and approximately 1 million MMBtu (million British thermal units) of natural gas at certain of our North America mines. Based on current cost estimates, energy will approximate 2025 percent of our copper mine site operating costs for 2019.2022.



Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation will vary under the UOP method as a result of changes in sales volumes and the related UOP rates at our mining operations. Consolidated DD&A totaled $1.75 billion in 2018, $1.7 billion in 2017 and $2.5$2.0 billion in 2016. The year 2018 included $31 million of depreciation expense at Freeport Cobalt from December 2016 through December 2017 that was suspended while it was classified as held for sale. Lower2021 and $1.5 billion in 2020. Higher DD&A in 2017,2021, compared with 2016,2020, primarily reflectedrelates to significant assets placed in service associated with the impactramp-up of underground mining at the sale of substantially all of our oilGrasberg minerals district.

Metals Inventory Adjustments
Unfavorable net realizable value metals inventory adjustments totaled $16 million in 2021 and gas properties$96 million in late 2016.

Impairment of Oil2020. Metals inventory adjustments in 2021 were primarily related to a leach stockpile adjustment. Metals inventory adjustments in 2020 were related to volatility in copper and Gas Properties
Under full cost accounting rules, we recognized impairment charges totaling $4.3 billion in 2016 primarily for U.S. oil and gas properties.molybdenum prices associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Refer to Note 14 for further discussion.details on our inventory adjustments.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $443 million in 2018, $477 million in 2017 and $597 million in 2016. Selling, general and administrative expenses included oil and gas contract termination costs of $17 million in 2017 and $85 million for restructuring costs in 2016.

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses were net of capitalized general and administrative expenses at our oil and gas operations totaling $78 million in 2016; no such costs were capitalized in subsequent periods.

Mining Exploration and Research Expenses
Consolidated exploration and research expenses for our mining operations totaled $105 million in 2018, $93 million in 2017 and $63 million in 2016. Our mining exploration activities are generally associated with our existing mines, focusing on opportunities to expand reserves and resources to support development of additional future production capacity. A drilling program to further delineate the Lone Star resource continues to indicate significant additional mineralization in this district, with higher ore grades than our other North America copper mines. Exploration results continue to indicate opportunities for significant future potential reserve additions in North America and South America. Exploration spending is expected to approximate $65 million in 2019.


Environmental Obligations and Shutdown Costs
Environmental obligation costs reflect net revisions to our long-term environmental obligations, which vary from period to period because of changes to environmental laws and regulations, the settlement of environmental matters and/or circumstances affecting our operations that could result in significant changes in our estimates (refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates - Environmental Obligations” for further discussion). Shutdown costs include care-and-maintenance costs and any litigation, remediation or related expenditures associated with closed facilities or operations.

Net charges for environmental obligations and shutdown costs totaled $89$91 million in 2018, $244 million in 2017 and $14 million in 2016. Higher costs in 2018 and 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflect2021, including unfavorable adjustments to environmental obligations resulting from revised cost estimates.totaling $41 million. Net charges for the year 2020 totaled $159 million, including talc-related litigation charges of $132 million, primarily associated with a framework for the resolution of all current and future potential talc-related litigation, partly offset by $19 million of net favorable adjustments to environmental obligations. Refer to Note 12 for environmental obligations and litigation matters.


Net Gain on Sales of Assets
Net gain on sales of assets totaled $208$80 million in 2018, primarily reflecting gains2021 and $473 million in 2020. Gains on sales of assets adjustments to the carrying value of assets no longer held for sale and fair value adjustments associated with contingent consideration related to the 2016 sale of onshore California oil and gas properties. Relative to 2018, we realized $50 million in contingent consideration related to the 2016 sale of oil and gas properties, which was received in 2019, and we would receive additional contingent consideration related to this transaction consisting of $50 million per year for 2019 and 2020 if the price of Brent crude oil averages over $70 per barrel in each of these calendar years.

Net gain on sales of assets totaled $81 million in 2017,2021 were primarily associated with oil and gas transactions and adjustments to assets held for sale.

Net gain on sales of assets totaled $649 million in 2016, primarily related to the gains recognized for the Morenci and Timok transactions, partly offset by estimated losses on assets held for sale. Net gain on sales of assets for the year 2016 also included $183 million for contingent consideration, including $150 million associated with the sale of the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) oilour remaining Freeport Cobalt assets and gas properties, and $33 million for the fair value of the potential $150 million in contingent consideration from the sale of carbon dioxide emissions credits at Atlantic Copper. Gains on sales of assets in 2020 were primarily associated with the onshore California oil and gas properties discussed above.

sale of our interests in the Kisanfu undeveloped exploration project. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of dispositions.


Interest Expense, Net
Consolidated interest costs (before capitalization and excluding interest expense associated with disputed Cerro Verde royalties)international tax matters) totaled $671$634 million in 2018, $7772021and$649 million in 2017 and $854 million in 2016. Lower interest expense in 2018 and 2017, compared to 2016, reflects a decrease in total debt.2020. Interest expense associated with disputed Cerro Verde royaltiesinternational tax matters totaled $40 million in 2021 and $96 million in 2020 (refer to Note 12 for further discussion) totaled $370 million in 2018and$145 million in 2017.11).


Capitalized interest varies with the level of expenditures for our development projects and average interest rates on our borrowings, and totaled $96 million in 2018, $121 million in 2017 and $99$72 million in 2016.2021 and $147 million in 2020. The decrease in capitalized interest in 2021, compared with 2020, is primarily related to significant assets at PT-FI’s underground mines being placed in service. Refer to “Operations” and “Capital Resources and Liquidity - Investing Activities” for further discussion of current development projects.


Other (Expense) Income, Net Gain on Early Extinguishment and Exchanges of Debt
Net gain on early extinguishment and exchanges of debtOther (expense) income, net, totaled $7 millionin 2018, $21$(105) million in 20172021 and $26$59 million in 2016. Refer2020. The year 2021 includes charges totaling $208 million associated with historical contested tax matters at PT-FI (refer to Note 8 for further discussion.

Other Income (Expense)11), Net
Other income (expense),partly offset by gains on currency exchange rate movements and other net primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments and interest income, and totaled $76 million in 2018, $(8) million in 2017 and $(14) million in 2016.credits. The year 2018, compared to the year 2017, reflects higher interest income and2020 includes a gain of $30 million for the sale of interest received on tax refunds, mostly associated with the refundroyalty interests.
82

Table of PT-FI’s prior years’ tax receivables.Contents

Income Taxes
Following is a summary of the approximate amounts used in the calculation of our consolidated income tax (provision) benefit from continuing operationsprovision for the years ended December 31 (in millions, except percentages):
20212020
Income (Loss)a
Effective
Tax Rate
Income Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
Income (Loss)a
Effective
Tax Rate
Income Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
U.S.b
$1,883 1%$(10)c$(532)11%$60 d
South America2,072 40%(820)e466 51%(239)f
Indonesia3,986 35%(1,377)g1,342 45%(608)h
PT-FI historical contested tax disputesi
(219)N/A(147)(44)N/A
Gain on sale of Kisanfu— N/A— 486 N/A(135)
Eliminations and other(63)N/A55 79 N/A(24)
Consolidated$7,659 30%$(2,299)$1,797 53%j$(944)
 2018 2017 
 
Income (Loss)a
 
Effective
Tax Rate
 Income Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
 
Income (Loss)a
 Effective
Tax Rate
 Income Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
 
U.S.$352
 7% $(24)
b,c 
$41
 (156)% $64
d 
South America706
 43% (303) 1,059
 41% (439) 
Indonesia3,027
 42% (1,284)
e 
2,033
 43% (869) 
U.S. tax reform
 N/A 123
f 

 N/A 393
f 
Cerro Verde royalty dispute(406) N/A 35
g 
(348) N/A (7)
g 
Change in PT-FI tax rates
 N/A 504
h 

 N/A 
 
Eliminations and other213
 N/A (42) 117
 N/A (25) 
Consolidated FCX$3,892
 25% $(991) $2,902
 30% $(883) 
a.Represents income (loss) before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies' net earnings.
b.In addition to our North America mining operations, the U.S. jurisdiction reflects corporate-level expenses, which include interest expense associated with senior notes, general and administrative expenses, and environmental obligations and shutdown costs.
 2016 
 
Income (Loss)a
 Effective
Tax Rate
 Income Tax
(Provision)
Benefit
 
U.S.$(865) 41% $357
i 
South America501
 43% (216)
j 
Indonesia1,058
 42% (442) 
Impairment of oil and gas properties(4,317) N/A 
k 
Eliminations and other151
 N/A (70) 
Consolidated FCX$(3,472) (11)% $(371) 
a.Represents income (loss) from continuing operations by geographic location before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings.
b.The year 2018 includes net tax credits of $9 million for changes in valuation allowances and a tax credit of $5 million associated with the settlement of a state income tax examination.
c.The year 2018 also includes a tax charge of $29 million associated with adjustments to the calculation of transition tax resulting from recently released guidance by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

d.The year 2017 includes net tax credits of $24 million for changes in valuation allowances and $21 million associated with alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards, which are not related to the AMT credits resulting from U.S. tax reform that are presented separately in the above tables.
e.Includes a tax credit of $20 million ($17 million net of noncontrolling interest) for adjustments to PT-FI's historical tax positions.
f.The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, included significant modifications to U.S. tax laws and created many new complex tax provisions. In December 2018, we completed our analysis of the Act and recognized benefits totaling $123 million ($119 million net of noncontrolling interest) in 2018 associated with AMT credit refunds. During 2017, we recorded net tax benefits related to specific provisions of the Act totaling $393 million, reflecting the reversal of valuation allowances associated with anticipated refunds of AMT credits through 2021 ($272 million) and a decrease in corporate income tax rates ($121 million).
g.Refer to Note 12 for a summary of charges related to Cerro Verde’s disputed royalties for prior years.
h.Reflects a tax credit of $504 million ($453 million net of noncontrolling interest) resulting from the change in PT-FI's tax rates in accordance with its IUPK.
i.Includes tax credits of $357 million associated with AMT credits, changes to valuation allowances and net operating loss carryback claims.
j.Includes a net tax credit of $13 million ($17 million net of noncontrolling interests) related to changes in Peruvian tax rules.
k.As a result of the impairment to U.S. oil and gas properties, we recorded tax charges to establish valuation allowances against U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets that will not generate a future benefit.

c.Includes valuation allowance release on prior year unbenefited NOLs.
d.Includes tax benefits of $53 million associated with the reversal of a year-end 2019 tax charge related to the sale of our interest in the lower zone of the Timok exploration project and $6 million associated with the removal of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
e.Includes a tax benefit at Cerro Verde of $18 million primarily associated with completion of tax audits for the years 2014 and 2015.
f.Includes tax charges at Cerro Verde of $15 million primarily associated with adjustments to profit sharing for prior years.
g.Includes net tax benefits associated with the release of valuation allowances recorded against PT Rio Tinto Indonesia NOLs totaling $189 million. The year 2021 also includes a tax benefit of $24 million, primarily associated with the reversal of a tax reserve related to the treatment of prior-year contractor support costs; partly offset by a tax charge of $10 million associated with the audit of PT-FI's 2019 tax returns.
h.Includes tax charges of $21 million associated with establishing a tax reserve related to the treatment of prior-year contractor support costs and $8 million associated with an unfavorable 2012 Indonesia Supreme Court ruling.
i.Refer to Note 11 for further discussion of these historical contested tax disputes.
j.Our consolidated effective income tax rate is a function of the combined effective tax rates for the jurisdictions in which we operate. Accordingly, variationsoperate, excluding the U.S. jurisdiction.

Assuming achievement of current sales volume and cost estimates and average prices of $4.50 per pound for copper, $1,800 per ounce for gold and $19.00 per pound for molybdenum for 2022, we estimate our consolidated effective tax rate for the year 2022 would approximate 30 percent. Changes in projected sales volumes and average prices during 2022 would incur tax impacts at estimated effective rates of 39 percent for Peru, 38 percent for Indonesia and 0 percent for the U.S.

Variations in the relative proportions of jurisdictional income result in fluctuations to our consolidated effective income tax rate. Assuming achievement of current sales volume and cost estimates and average prices of $2.75 per pound for copper, $1,300 per ounce for gold and $12.00 per pound for molybdenum for 2019, we estimate our consolidated effective tax rate for the year 2019 would approximate 46 percent (comprised of an estimated effective rate of 0 percent on U.S. income, 38 percent on Indonesia income and 40 percent on South America income). Because of our U.S. tax position, we do not record a financial statement impact for income or losses generated in the U.S.; therefore, our consolidated effective rate is generally higher than the international rates at lower copper prices and lower than international rates at higher copper prices.


Refer to Note 11 for further discussion of income taxes.


Net (Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations
83
In November 2016, we completed the sale


Gain on Redemption and Preferred Dividends Attributable to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
In connection with the December 2016 sale of the Deepwater GOM oil and gas properties, we settled a preferred stock obligation, which resulted in the recognition of a $199 million gain on redemption. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.

OPERATIONS


Responsible Production
The Copper Mark. We are committed to validating all of our copper producing sites with the Copper Mark, a comprehensive assurance framework designed to demonstrate the copper industry's responsible production practices. To achieve the Copper Mark, each site is required to complete an external assurance process to assess conformance with 32 environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements. We have a total of seven sites that have been validated (Bagdad, Morenci, Miami, El Paso, Cerro Verde, El Abra and Atlantic Copper) and we have commenced the Copper Mark assessment process at four additional sites in North America, including Chino, Tyrone, Safford and Sierrita.

International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM).We are a founding and active member of the ICMM, an international organization dedicated to safe, fair and sustainable mining. We are committed to implementing ICMM's Mining Principles which serve as a best practice framework on sustainable development for the global mining and metals industry. Our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer serves as the current Chair of ICMM.

2020 Annual Report on Sustainability. We published our 2020 Annual Report on Sustainability in April 2021, which is available on our website. We have a long history of ESG programs and are continuously striving to improve and embrace evolving stakeholder expectations. This report marked our 20th year of reporting on our sustainability progress and our first year reporting in alignment with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Metals & Mining industry framework. We are committed to building upon our achievements in sustainability and seek to contribute positively to society by supplying the world with responsibly produced copper. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for further discussion of ESG-related risks.

2020 Climate Report. We published our updated climate report in September 2021, which is available on our website. The climate report details the work underway across our global business to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, improve energy efficiency, advance the use of renewable energy and enhance our resilience to future climate-related risks. The updated climate report includes our GHG emissions reduction targets and aspirations and reflects our continued progress towards alignment with the current recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for further discussion of climate-related risks.

Innovation Initiatives
During 2021, we continued to advance innovation initiatives designed to enhance productivity, expand margins and reduce the capital intensity of our business through the utilization of new technology applications in combination with a more interactive operating structure. These initiatives are expected to allow us to recover additional copper from our large existing leach stockpiles. There are several projects ongoing across our North America and South America operations, which incorporate new applications, technologies and data analytics. Initial results are encouraging and support additional work on these emerging opportunities.

North America Copper Mines
We operate seven open-pit copper mines in North America - Morenci, Bagdad, Safford (including Lone Star), Sierrita and Miami in Arizona, and Chino and Tyrone in New Mexico. All of the North America mining operations are wholly owned, except for Morenci.

We record our 72 percent undivided joint venture interest in Morenci using the proportionate consolidation method. In May 2016, we completed the sale of an additional 13 percent undivided interest in Morenci. As a result of the transaction, our undivided interest in Morenci was prospectively reduced from 85 percent to 72 percent. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.



The North America copper mines include open-pit mining, sulfide oresulfide-ore concentrating, leaching and solution extraction/electrowinning (SX/EW) operations. A majority of the copper produced at our North America copper mines is cast into copper rod by our Rod & Refining segment. The remainder of our North America copper salesproduction is in the form ofsold as copper cathode or copper concentrate, a portion of which is shipped to Atlantic Copper (our wholly owned smelter). Molybdenum concentrate, gold and silver are also produced by certain of our North America copper mines.


Operating and Development Activities. We have significant undevelopedsubstantial mineral reserves and resourcesfuture opportunities in North America
the U.S., primarily associated with existing mining operations. Current operations at the Lone Star copper leach project at our Safford mine, which was completed in the second half of 2020, are exceeding the initial design capacity of 200 million pounds annually and a portfolioproduced approximately 235 million pounds of potential long-term development projects. Future investments will be undertaken based on the results of economic and technical feasibility studies, and are dependent on market conditions.copper in 2021. We continue to studyadvance opportunities to reduce the capital intensity of our potential long-term development projects.

Through exploration drilling, we have identified a significant resource at our wholly ownedincrease Lone Star project located near the Safford operation in eastern Arizona. An initial projectoperating rates and are advancing plans to develop the Lone Star oxide ores commenced in first-quarter 2018, with first production expected by the end of 2020. Initial production from the Lone Star oxide ores is expectedincrease volumes to average approximately 200achieve 300 million pounds of copper per year. Total capital costs, includingyear from oxide ores. The oxide project advances the opportunity for development of
84

the large-scale sulfide resources at Lone Star. We are increasing exploration in the area to support metallurgical testing and mine equipmentdevelopment planning for a potential long-term investment in a concentrator.

We are also evaluating an expansion to potentially double concentrator capacity at our Bagdad operation in northwest Arizona, and pre-production stripping,are engaging stakeholders. Feasibility studies to double Bagdad's operating rates are expected to approximate $850 million and will benefit from the utilization of existing infrastructure at the adjacent Safford operation. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $290 million has been incurred for this project. The project also advances exposure to a significant sulfide resource. We expect to incorporate recent positive drilling and ongoing resultscommence in our future development plans. 2022.


Operating Data. Following is summary operating data for the North America copper mines for the years ended December 31:
 2021 2020
Operating Data, Net of Joint Venture Interests  
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
  
Production1,460 1,418 
Sales, excluding purchases1,436 1,422 
Average realized price per pound$4.30 $2.82 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
  
Productiona
34 33 
100% Operating Data  
Leach operations  
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)665,900 714,300 
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.29 0.27 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)1,056 1,047 
Mill operations  
Ore milled (metric tons per day)269,500 279,700 
Average ore grade (percent):
Copper0.38 0.35 
Molybdenum0.03 0.02 
Copper recovery rate (percent)81.2 84.1 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)649 647 
 2018 2017 2016 
Operating Data, Net of Joint Venture Interests      
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
      
Production1,404
 1,518
 1,831
 
Sales, excluding purchases1,428
 1,484
 1,841
a 
Average realized price per pound$2.96
 $2.85
 $2.24
 
       
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
      
Productionb
32
 33
 33
 
       
100% Operating Data      
Leach operations      
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)681,400
 679,000
 737,400
 
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.24
 0.28
 0.31
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)951
 1,016
 1,120
 
       
Mill operations      
Ore milled (metric tons per day)301,000
 299,500
 300,500
 
Average ore grade (percent):      
Copper0.35
 0.39
 0.47
 
Molybdenum0.02
 0.03
 0.03
 
Copper recovery rate (percent)87.8
 86.4
 85.5
 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)719
 788
 958
 
a.Included approximately 60 million pounds of copper from the 13 percent undivided interest in Morenci that we sold in May 2016.
b.Refer to “Consolidated Results” for our consolidated molybdenum sales volumes, which include sales of molybdenum produced at the North America copper mines.

a.Refer to “Consolidated Results” for our consolidated molybdenum sales volumes, which include sales of molybdenum produced at the North America copper mines.

Copper sales volumes from our North America copper mines totaled 1.4 billion pounds in 2018, 1.5 billion pounds in 2017 2021and 1.8 billion pounds in 2016. The decreases in 2018 and 2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflect lower ore grades.

2020. North America copper sales are estimated to approximate 1.41.55 billion pounds of copper in 2019.2022. Refer to “Outlook” for projected molybdenum sales volumes.


Unit Net Cash Costs. Unit net cash costs per pound of copper is a measure intended to provide investors with information about the cash-generating capacity of our mining operations expressed on a basis relating to the primary metal product for our respective operations. We use this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring operating performance by our mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This measure is presented by other metals mining companies, although our measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.



85

Gross Profit per Pound of Copper and Molybdenum
The following tables summarizetable summarizes unit net cash costs and gross profit per pound of copper at our North America copper mines for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2018.2021. Refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for an explanation of the “by-product” and “co-product” methods and a reconciliation of unit net cash costs per pound to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements.
 20212020
 By-Co-Product MethodBy-Co-Product Method
Product
Method
Copper
Molyb-
denuma
Product
Method
Copper
Molyb-
denuma
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.30 $4.30 $14.14 $2.82 $2.82 $8.62 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash      
and other costs shown below2.13 1.96 8.17 1.90 1.78 6.84 
By-product credits(0.33)— — (0.19)— — 
Treatment charges0.09 0.09 — 0.10 0.10 — 
Unit net cash costs1.89 2.05 8.17 1.81 1.88 6.84 
DD&A0.25 0.24 0.62 0.25 0.23 0.56 
Metals inventory adjustments0.01 0.01 — 0.03 0.03 — 
Noncash and other costs, net0.07 b0.07 0.03 0.10 c0.10 0.09 
Total unit costs2.22 2.37 8.82 2.19 2.24 7.49 
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on prior period open sales— — — (0.02)(0.02)— 
Gross profit per pound$2.08 $1.93 $5.32 $0.61 $0.56 $1.13 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,436 1,436  1,420 1,420  
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
  34   33 
 2018 2017
 By- Co-Product Method By- Co-Product Method
 
Product
Method
 Copper 
Molyb-
denuma
 
Product
Method
 Copper 
Molyb-
denuma
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.96
 $2.96
 $11.64
 $2.85
 $2.85
 $7.80
Site production and delivery, before net noncash           
and other costs shown below1.94
 1.77
 9.03
 1.63
 1.52
 5.75
By-product credits(0.26) 
 
 (0.17) 
 
Treatment charges0.11
 0.10
 
 0.10
 0.10
 
Unit net cash costs1.79
 1.87
 9.03
 1.56
 1.62
 5.75
DD&A0.25
 0.23
 0.73
 0.29
 0.27
 0.54
Noncash and other costs, net0.07
 0.06
 0.17
 0.06
 0.06
 0.07
Total unit costs2.11
 2.16
 9.93
 1.91
 1.95
 6.36
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on prior period open sales
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit per pound$0.85
 $0.80
 $1.71
 $0.94
 $0.90
 $1.44
            
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,426
 1,426
   1,481
 1,481
  
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
    32
     33
a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.

a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes credits totaling $0.02 per pound of copper associated with refunds of Arizona transaction privilege taxes related to purchased electricity.
c.Includes charges totaling $0.02 per pound of copper, primarily associated with our April 2020 revised operating plans (including employee separation costs) and the COVID-19 pandemic (including health and safety costs).

Our North America copper mines have varying cost structures because of differences in ore grades and characteristics, processing costs, by-product credits and other factors. During 2018,2021, average unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for the North America copper mines ranged from $1.55$1.47 per pound to $2.63$2.86 per pound at the individual mines and averaged $1.79$1.89 per pound. Higher average unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) of $1.79$1.89 in 2018,2021, compared with $1.56$1.81 per pound in 2017,2020, primarily reflectedreflect higher mining and milling costs associated with higher operating rates at Lone Star and higher maintenance and input costs, partly offset by higher by-product credits because of higher molybdenum credits.prices.

Because certain assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis, North America’s average unit depreciation rate may vary with asset additions and the level of copper production and sales. North America’s average unit depreciation rate is expected to be lower in 2019, compared to 2018, as a result of reserve additions. See “Critical Accounting Estimates-Mineral Reserves” for further discussion.


Average unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our North America copper mines are expected to
approximate $1.86$2.00 per pound of copper in 2019,2022, based on achievement of current sales volume and cost
estimates and assuming an average molybdenum price of $12.00$19.00 per pound. The impact of price changes during 2022 on North America’s average unit net cash costs in 2019for the year 2022 would change by approximatelyapproximate $0.04 per pound for each $2 per pound change in the average price of molybdenum.


 2017 2016
 By- Co-Product Method By- Co-Product Method
 
Product
Method
 Copper 
Molyb-
denuma
 
Product
Method
 Copper 
Molyb-
denuma
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.85
 $2.85
 $7.80
 $2.24
 $2.24
 $6.34
Site production and delivery, before net noncash           
and other costs shown below1.63
 1.52
 5.75
 1.41
 1.34
 4.91
By-product credits(0.17) 
 
 (0.12) 
 
Treatment charges0.10
 0.10
 
 0.11
 0.10
 
Unit net cash costs1.56
 1.62
 5.75
 1.40
 1.44
 4.91
DD&A0.29
 0.27
 0.54
 0.29
 0.27
 0.60
Noncash and other costs, net0.06
 0.06
 0.07
 0.04
 0.04
 0.06
Total unit costs1.91
 1.95
 6.36
 1.73
 1.75
 5.57
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on prior period open sales
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profit per pound$0.94
 $0.90
 $1.44
 $0.51
 $0.49
 $0.77
            
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,481
 1,481
   1,836
 1,836
  
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
    33
     33
a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.

Unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our North America copper mines increased to $1.56 per pound of copper in 2017, compared with $1.40 per pound in 2016, primarily reflecting lower copper sales volumes.

South America Mining
We operate two copper mines in South America - Cerro Verde in Peru (in which we own a 53.56 percent interest) and El Abra in Chile (in which we own a 5151.0 percent interest), which are consolidated in our financial statements.


South America mining includes open-pit mining, sulfide oresulfide-ore concentrating, leaching and SX/EW operations. Production from our South America mines is sold as copper concentrate or cathode under long-term contracts. Our South America mines also sell a portion of their copper concentrate production to Atlantic Copper. In addition to copper, the Cerro Verde mine produces molybdenum concentrate and silver.



86

Operating and Development Activities. Milling rates at Cerro Verde’s expanded operations benefit from its large-scale, long-lived reserves and cost efficiencies. Cerro Verde’sVerde's concentrator facilities have continued to perform well, with average mill throughput rates of 387,600averaged 380,300 metric tons of ore per day for the year 2018. During 2018, Cerro Verde received a modified environmental permit allowing it to operate its existing concentrator facilities at rates up to 409,5002021, compared with 331,600 metric tons of ore per day.day for the year 2020 when COVID-19 restrictions resulted in reduced rates. Subject to ongoing monitoring of COVID-19 protocols, Cerro Verde is targeting milling rates to increase to approximately 400,000 metric tons of ore per day during 2022.


El Abra increased operating rates to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels during 2021. Increased mining and stacking activities are expected to result in a 30 percent increase in El Abra copper production for the year 2022, compared with the year 2021.
We continue to evaluate a large-scale expansion at El Abra to process additional sulfide material and to achieve higher copper recoveries. El Abra’sAbra's large sulfide resource could potentially support a major mill project similar to the facilities constructed at Cerro Verde.Verde in 2015. Technical and economic studies are being advancedcontinue to be evaluated to determine the optimal scope and timing for the sulfide project, and we are engaging stakeholders and preparing data required for submission of the project.a robust permit application. We are continuing to monitor potential changes in regulatory and fiscal matters in Chile and will defer major investment decisions pending clarity on these matters.





Operating Data. Following is summary operating data for our South America mining operations for the years ended December 31.
 2021 2020
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
  
Production1,047 979 
Sales1,055 976 
Average realized price per pound$4.34 $3.05 
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
  
Productiona
21 19 
Leach operations  
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)163,900 160,300 
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.32 0.35 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)256 241 
Mill operations  
Ore milled (metric tons per day)380,300 331,600 b
Average ore grade (percent):
Copper0.31 0.34 
Molybdenum0.01 0.01 
Copper recovery rate (percent)87.3 84.3 
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)791 738 
 2018 2017 2016
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
     
Production1,249
 1,235
 1,328
Sales1,253
 1,235
 1,332
Average realized price per pound$2.87
 $2.97
 $2.31
      
Molybdenum (millions of recoverable pounds)
     
Productiona
28
 27
 21
      
Leach operations     
Leach ore placed in stockpiles (metric tons per day)195,200
 142,800
 149,100
Average copper ore grade (percent)0.33
 0.37
 0.41
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)287
 255
 328
      
Mill operations     
Ore milled (metric tons per day)387,600
 360,100
 353,400
Average ore grade (percent):     
Copper0.38
 0.44
 0.43
Molybdenum0.01
 0.02
 0.02
Copper recovery rate (percent)84.3
 81.2
 85.8
Copper production (millions of recoverable pounds)962
 980
 1,000
a.a.Refer to “Consolidated Results” for our consolidated molybdenum sales volumes, which include sales of molybdenum produced at Cerro Verde.

Consolidated copper sales volumes, from South Americawhich include sales of 1.25 billion pounds in 2018molybdenum produced at Cerro Verde.
b.Cerro Verde mill operations were approximately 1 percent higher than 1.24 billion pounds in 2017, primarily reflecting higher mining and milling rates, partly offsetimpacted by lower ore grades.COVID-19 restrictions.


LowerHigher consolidated copper sales volumes from South America of 1.241.1 billion pounds in 2017,2021, compared with 1.331.0 billion pounds in 2016,2020, primarily reflected lower recoveryreflect higher mining and milling rates at Cerro Verde and lower ore grades at El Abra.Verde.


Copper sales from South America mines are expected to approximate 1.31.2 billion pounds of copper in 2019.2022. Refer to “Outlook” for projected molybdenum sales volumes. Since late January 2019, our El Abra operation has experienced heavy rainfall and electrical storms, resulting in a suspension of operations since February 4, 2019. We have been unable to assess damages because of poor road conditions and inaccessible areas and we do not currently know when normal operations will resume. We estimate the impact on 2019 production will approximate 8 million pounds of copper through mid-February 2019, and additional impacts of approximately 600 thousand pounds of copper per day are expected until normal operations resume.


Unit Net Cash Costs. Unit net cash costs per pound of copper is a measure intended to provide investors with information about the cash-generating capacity of our mining operations expressed on a basis relating to the primary metal product for our respective operations. We use this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring operating performance by our mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This measure is presented by other metals mining companies, although our measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.



87

Gross Profit per Pound of Copper
The following tables summarizetable summarizes unit net cash costs and gross profit per pound of copper at our South America mining operations for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2018.2021. Unit net cash costs per pound of copper are reflected under the by-product and co-product methods as the South America mining operations also had sales of molybdenum and silver. Refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for an explanation of the “by-product” and “co-product” methods and a reconciliation of unit net cash costs per pound to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements.

 20212020
By-Product
Method
Co-Product
Method
By-Product
Method
Co-Product
Method
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.34 $4.34 $3.05 $3.05 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash    
and other costs shown below2.23 a2.06 1.86 1.74 
By-product credits(0.32)— (0.17)— 
Treatment charges0.13 0.13 0.15 0.15 
Royalty on metals0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 
Unit net cash costs2.05 2.20 1.85 1.90 
DD&A0.39 0.37 0.43 0.41 
Noncash and other costs, net0.03 b0.03 0.13 c0.12 
Total unit costs2.47 2.60 2.41 2.43 
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on
prior period open sales0.09 0.09 (0.07)(0.07)
Gross profit per pound$1.96 $1.83 $0.57 $0.55 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,055 1,055 976 976 
 2018 2017 2016
 
By-Product
Method
 
Co-Product
Method
 
By-Product
Method
 
Co-Product
Method
 
By-Product
Method
 
Co-Product
Method
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.87
 $2.87
 $2.97
 $2.97
 $2.31
 $2.31
Site production and delivery, before net noncash           
and other costs shown below1.79
a 
1.65
 1.59
 1.49
 1.26
 1.20
By-product credits(0.24) 
 (0.18) 
 (0.10) 
Treatment charges0.19
 0.19
 0.22
 0.22
 0.24
 0.24
Royalty on metals0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 0.01
 
Unit net cash costs1.75
 1.85
 1.64
 1.72
 1.41
 1.44
DD&A0.44
 0.40
 0.43
 0.39
 0.41
 0.39
Noncash and other costs, net0.06
b 
0.06
 0.19
b 
0.18
 0.03
 0.03
Total unit costs2.25
 2.31
 2.26
 2.29
 1.85
 1.86
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on           
prior period open sales(0.03) (0.03) 0.03
 0.03
 0.01
 0.01
Gross profit per pound$0.59
 $0.53
 $0.74
 $0.71
 $0.47
 $0.46
            
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,253
 1,253
 1,235
 1,235
 1,332
 1,332
a.Includes $0.06 per pound of copper for the year 2018 associated with charges for Cerro Verde's new three-year CLA.
b.Includes charges totaling $0.01 per pound of copper for the year 2018 and $0.16 per pound of copper for the year 2017, associated with disputed Cerro Verde royalties for prior years (refer to Note 12 for further discussion).

During 2018, unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for the South America mines averaged $1.75 per pound, including $1.67a.Includes charges totaling $0.09 per pound of copper for theassociated with nonrecurring labor-related charges at Cerro Verde mine and $2.13for collective labor agreements reached with its hourly employees.
b.Includes credits totaling $0.03 per pound forof copper associated with favorable adjustments to prior-years’ profit sharing at Cerro Verde.
c.Includes charges totaling $0.09 per pound of copper, primarily associated with idle facility (Cerro Verde) and contract cancellation costs related to the El Abra mine.COVID-19 pandemic, and employee separation costs associated with our April 2020 revised operating plans.

Our South America mines have varying cost structures because of differences in ore grades and characteristics, processing costs, by-product credits and other factors. Higher average unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our South America mining operations in 2018, compared with $1.64 per pound in 2017, primarily reflected higher mining and milling costs and costs associated with Cerro Verde’s new three-year CLA, partly offset by higher by-product credits.

Unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our South America mining operations increased to $1.64$2.05 per pound of copper in 2017,2021, compared with $1.41$1.85 per pound in 2016,2020, primarily reflecting lower sales volumesreflect increased profit-sharing costs and nonrecurring labor-related charges at Cerro Verde for collective labor agreements and higher mining, millingmaintenance and employeeinput costs, at Cerro Verde, partly offset by higher sales volumes and by-product credits.


Revenues from Cerro Verde’s concentrate sales are recorded net of treatment charges, which will vary with Cerro Verde’s sales volumes and the price of copper.


Because certain assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis, South America’s unit depreciation rate may vary with asset additions and the level of copper production and sales. South America’s average unit depreciation rate is expected to be lower in 2019, compared to 2018, as a result of reserve additions. See “Critical Accounting Estimates-Mineral Reserves” for further discussion.


Revenue adjustments primarily result from changes in prices on provisionally priced copper sales recognized in prior periods. Refer to “Consolidated Results - Revenues” for further discussion of adjustments to prior period provisionally priced copper sales.


Average unit net cash costs (net of by-product credits) for our South America mining operationsmines are expected to
approximate $1.66$2.06 per pound of copper in 2019,2022, based on current sales volume and cost estimates and assuming an average pricesprice of $12.00$19.00 per pound of molybdenum in 2019.molybdenum.


88

Indonesia Mining
We operate PT-FI’s mining operations, in which we own a 48.76 percent interest and consolidate in our financial statements. PT-FI’s assets include one of the world’s largest copper and gold deposits at the Grasberg minerals district in Papua, Indonesia. PT-FI produces copper concentrate that contains significant quantities of gold and silver. We have a 48.76 percent interest in PT-FI and manage its mining operations. As further discussed in Note 3, under the terms of the shareholders agreement, our economic interest in PT-FI approximates 81 percent through 2022 and 48.76 percent thereafter. PT-FI’s results are consolidated in our financial statements.


Substantially all of PT-FI’s copper concentrate is sold under long-term contracts, and in 2018, approximately 38contracts. During 2021, 41 percent of PT-FI’s copper concentrate was sold to PT Smelting (PT-FI’s 25 percent-owned smelter(PT-FI owned 25.0 percent of PT Smelting prior to April 30, 2021, and refinery39.5 percent thereafter - See Note 2).

Operating and Development Activities. PT-FI currently has three underground operating mines in Gresik, Indonesia).the Grasberg minerals district: Grasberg Block Cave, DMLZ and Big Gossan. The ramp-up of underground production at the Grasberg minerals district continues to advance on schedule. For the year 2021, highlights include:

Regulatory Matters. On December 21, 2018, we completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rightsAchieved quarterly copper and share ownership. We expect our share of future cash flowsgold volumes in fourth-quarter 2021 approximating 100 percent of the expanded projected annualized levels discussed below.
139 new drawbells were constructed at the Grasberg Block Cave and DMLZ underground mines, bringing cumulative open drawbells to 510.
Combined average production from the Grasberg Block Cave and DMLZ underground mines approximated 128,600 metric tons of ore per day (more than double the year 2020 rates) and PT-FI's total milling rates averaged 151,600 metric tons of ore per day.

PT-FI asset base, combined with the cash proceeds receivedexpects milling rates to average approximately 180,000 metric tons of ore per day in the transaction, to be comparable to our share2022. The installation of anticipated future cash flows under PT-FI’s former COWadditional milling facilities are in progress and Rio Tinto Joint Venture.

In connection with the transaction, a 40 percent share ownership in PT-FI was issued to PT Inalum and PTI (which isare currently expected to be owned by PT Inalumcompleted in 2023, which will increase milling capacity to approximately 240,000 metric tons of ore per day.

PT-FI expects to generate average annual production of approximately 1.6 billion pounds of copper and 1.6 million ounces of gold for the provincial/regional government in Papua)next five years at an attractive unit net cash cost, providing significant margins and cash flows.

PT-FI's estimated capital spending on the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interests were effectively merged into PT-FI. As a result, PT Inalum'sGrasberg Block Cave and PTI's collective share ownership of PT-FI totals 51.24 percent and our share ownership is 48.76 percent. The arrangements provideDMLZ underground projects for us and the other pre-transaction PT-FI shareholders to retain the economics of the revenue and cost sharing arrangements under the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture. As a result, our economic interest in PT-FIyear 2022 is expected to approximate 81 percent$1.0 billion, net of scheduled contributions from 2019 through 2022.

We,PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero) (PT Inalum, also known as MIND ID). PT-FI PTIis also advancing construction of a dual-fuel power plant and upgrades to the mill circuit to improve recoveries. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the aggregate costs (before scheduled contributions from PT Inalum), expected to approximate $1.2 billion for the year 2022, will be reflected as an investing activity in our cash flow statement, and contributions from PT Inalum also entered intowill be reflected as a shareholdersfinancing activity.

Kucing Liar. In October 2021, PT-FI commenced long-term mine development activities for its Kucing Liar deposit, which is expected to produce over 6 billion pounds of copper and 5 million ounces of gold between 2028 and the end of 2041. Similar to PT-FI's experience with large-scale, block-cave mines, pre-production development activities will occur over an approximate 10-year timeframe. At full operating rates, annual production from Kucing Liar is expected to approximate 600 million pounds of copper and 500 thousand ounces of gold, providing PT-FI with sustained long-term, large-scale and low-cost production. Capital investments for Kucing Liar over the next 10 years are expected to average approximately $400 million per year. Kucing Liar will benefit from substantial shared infrastructure and PT-FI's experience and long-term success in block-cave mining.

Indonesia Smelter Capacity. In connection with PT-FI’s 2018 agreement at closing, which includes provisions relatedwith the Indonesia government to secure the extension of its long-term mining rights, PT-FI committed to construct additional domestic smelting capacity totaling 2 million metric tons of concentrate per year by the end of 2023.

During 2020, PT-FI notified the Indonesia government of schedule delays resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to review with the government a revised schedule for satisfying its commitment.
89

On January 7, 2021, the Indonesia government levied an administrative fine of $149 million on PT-FI for failing to achieve physical development progress on the greenfield smelter as of July 31, 2020. During 2021, PT-FI recorded charges totaling $16 million for a potential settlement of the administrative fine. On January 25, 2022, the Indonesia government submitted a new estimate of the administrative fine totaling $57 million. On February 15, 2022, PT-FI responded to the governance and managementIndonesia government with a revised calculation of $37 million. PT-FI and establishes our control overexpects to record a charge in first-quarter 2022 for an amount in excess of the management of PT-FI's operations. As a result, we continue to consolidate PT-FI in our financial statements.

previously recorded $16 million. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the transaction.

Concurrent with closing the transaction, the Indonesian government granted PT-FI an IUPK to replace its former COW, enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend mining rights through 2041, subject to PT-FI completing the construction of a new smelter in Indonesia within five years of closing the transaction12 and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the Indonesian government. The IUPK, and related documentation, contains legal and fiscal terms and is legally enforceable through 2041. In addition, we, as a foreign investor, have rights to resolve investment disputes with the Indonesian government through international arbitration. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.

Refer toItem 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for further discussiondiscussion.

PT-FI is actively engaging in the following projects for additional domestic smelting capacity:
Construction of risks associateda greenfield smelter with our mining operationsa capacity to process approximately 1.7 million metric tons of concentrate per year. In July 2021, PT-FI awarded a construction contract with an estimated cost of $2.8 billion. During 2021, PT-FI progressed site preparation activities and expects engineering procurement and construction activities to advance during 2022 and 2023. The smelter construction is expected to be completed as soon as feasible in Indonesia.2024, which is subject to potential pandemic-related disruptions and other factors.

Expansion of PT Smelting's capacity by 30 percent to 1.3 million metric tons of concentrate per year, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2023. PT-FI completed agreements in November 2021 with the majority owner of PT Smelting to implement the expansion plans. PT-FI is funding the cost of the expansion, estimated to approximate $250 million, with a loan that will convert to equity and increase ownership in PT Smelting to a majority ownership interest once the expansion is complete.
OperatingConstruction of a PMR to process gold and Development Activities.silver from the greenfield smelter and PT Smelting at an estimated cost of $250 million.

In July 2021, PT-FI entered into a $1.0 billion, five-year, unsecured bank credit facility to advance these projects. As of December 31, 2021, $443 million ($432 million net of debt issuance costs) was drawn under this facility. PT-FI is currently miningarranging incremental financing for these projects, with the final phasecost of the Grasberg open pitdebt shared 48.76 percent by us and expects to transition to the Grasberg Block Cave (GBC) underground mine in the first half of 2019.

PT-FI continues to advance several projects in the Grasberg minerals district related to the development of its large-scale, long-lived, high-grade underground ore bodies. In aggregate, these underground ore bodies are expected to produce large-scale quantities of copper and gold following the transition from the Grasberg open pit.

PT-FI's estimated annual capital spending on underground mine development projects is expected to average $0.7 billion per year over the next four years, net of scheduled contributions from51.24 percent by PT Inalum. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, aggregate costs (before scheduled contributions from PT Inalum), which are expectedRefer to average $0.9 billion per year through 2022, will be reflected as an investing activity in FCX's cash flow statement, and contributions from PT Inalum, which are expected to average approximately $0.17 billion per year through 2022, will be reflected as a financing activity. Considering the long-term nature and size of these projects, actual costs could vary from these estimates.Note 8 for further discussion.


PT-FI has also committed to construct a new smelter in Indonesia by December 21, 2023. PT-FI has reviewed various process technologies and is initiating front-end engineering and designCapital expenditures for the selected technologyIndonesia smelter projects totaled $0.2 billion for 2021, and intends to pursue financing, commercial and potential partner arrangements for this project, which has a preliminary estimated capital cost in the $3 billion range. The economics of PT-FI’s share of the new smelter will be borne by PT-FI’s shareholders according to their respective long-term share ownership percentages.

The following provides additional information on the continued development of the Common Infrastructure project, the GBC underground mine and the Deep Mill Level Zone (DMLZ) ore body that lies below the Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) underground mine.

Common Infrastructure and GBC Underground Mine. In 2004, PT-FI commenced its Common Infrastructure project to provide access to its large undeveloped underground ore bodies located in the Grasberg minerals district through a tunnel system located approximately 400 meters deeper than its existing underground tunnel system. In addition

to providing access to our underground ore bodies, the tunnel system will enable PT-FI to conduct future exploration in prospective areas associated with currently identified ore bodies. The tunnel system was completed to the Big Gossan terminal and development of the GBC and DMLZ underground mines is advancing using the Common Infrastructure project tunnels as access.

The GBC underground mine accounts for approximately half of our recoverable proven and probable reserves in Indonesia. Substantial progress has been made to prepare for the transition to mining of the GBC underground mine. First undercut blasting occurred in September 2018, first drawbell blasting occurred in December 2018 and cave production is scheduled for the first half of 2019. All underground mining levels and the ore flow system are being commissioned. Production rates over the next five years are expected to ramp up to 130,000 metric tons per day.

Mine development capital for the GBC underground mine and associated Common Infrastructure is expected to approximate $6.8 billion, including $3.9 billion incurred through December 31, 2018 ($0.6 billion during 2018).

DMLZ. The DMLZ ore body lies below the DOZ mine at the 2,590-meter elevation and represents the downward continuation of mineralization in the Ertsberg East Skarn system and neighboring Ertsberg porphyry. In September 2015, PT-FI initiated pre-commercial production that represented ore extracted during the development phase for the purpose of obtaining access to the ore body. During third-quarter 2018, PT-FI commenced hydraulic fracturing activities to manage rock stresses and pre-condition the DMLZ underground mine for large-scale production following mining induced seismic activity experienced in 2017 and 2018. Results to date have been effective in managing rock stresses and pre-conditioning the cave. PT-FI expects to commence the ramp-up of production in the DMLZ underground mine by mid-2019 and to reach full production rates of 80,000 metric tons per day in 2022. Estimates of timing of future production continue to be reviewed and may be modified as additional information becomes available.

Mine development capital costs for the DMLZ underground mine are expected to approximate $3.3$1.4 billion including $2.5for 2022, $1.1 billion incurred through December 31, 2018 (approximatelyfor 2023 and $0.4 billion during 2018).for 2024, excluding capitalized interest, owner’s costs and commissioning. Development of additional smelting capacity in Indonesia will result in the elimination of export duties, providing an offset to the economic cost associated with the Indonesia smelter projects.




90

Operating Data. Following is summary operating data for our Indonesia mining operations for the years ended December 31.
 2021 2020
Operating Data  
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
  
Production1,336 809 
Sales1,316 804 
Average realized price per pound$4.34 $3.08 
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
  
Production1,370 848 
Sales1,349 842 
Average realized price per ounce$1,796 $1,832 
100% Operating Data  
Ore milled (metric tons per day):  
Grasberg Block Cave70,600 30,800 
DMLZ58,000 28,600 
Deep Ore Zonea
8,700 20,900 
Big Gossan7,500 7,000 
Other6,800 400 
Total151,600 87,700 
Average ore grade:  
Copper (percent)1.30 1.32 
Gold (grams per metric ton)1.04 1.10 
Recovery rates (percent):
Copper89.8 91.9 
Gold77.0 78.1 
Production (recoverable):
Copper (millions of pounds)1,336 809 
Gold (thousands of ounces)1,370 848 
 2018 2017 2016
Operating Data, Net of Rio Tinto Joint Venture Interesta
     
Copper (millions of recoverable pounds)
     
Production1,160
 984
 1,063
Sales1,130
 981
 1,054
Average realized price per pound$2.89
 $3.00
 $2.32
      
Gold (thousands of recoverable ounces)
     
Production2,416
 1,554
 1,061
Sales2,366
 1,540
 1,054
Average realized price per ounce$1,254
 $1,268
 $1,237
      
100% Operating Data     
Ore milled (metric tons per day):b
     
Grasberg open pit133,300
 101,800
 119,700
DOZ underground mine33,800
 31,200
 38,000
DMLZ underground mine3,200
 3,200
 4,400
GBC underground mine4,000
 3,600
 2,700
Big Gossan underground mine3,800
 600
 900
Total178,100
 140,400
 165,700
      
Average ore grade:     
Copper (percent)0.98
 1.01
 0.91
Gold (grams per metric ton)1.58
 1.15
 0.68
Recovery rates (percent):     
Copper91.8
 91.6
 91.0
Gold84.7
 85.0
 82.2
Production (recoverable):     
Copper (millions of pounds)1,227
 996
 1,063
Gold (thousands of ounces)2,697
 1,554
 1,061
a.Ore body depleted in 2021.
a.Operating data through December 21, 2018, is net of the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
b.Amounts represent the approximate average daily throughput processed at PT-FI’s mill facilities from each producing mine and from development activities that result in metal production.


Higher copper and goldconsolidated sales volumes from our Indonesia mining operations of 1.11.3 billion pounds of copper and 2.41.3 million ounces of gold in 2018,2021, compared with 1.00.8 billion pounds of copper and 1.50.8 million ounces of gold in 2017,2020, primarily reflected higher milling rates and gold ore grades.reflect the ramp-up of underground mining at the Grasberg minerals district.


SalesConsolidated sales volumes from our Indonesia mining operations totaled 1.0PT-FI are expected to approximate 1.6 billion pounds of copper and 1.51.6 million ounces of gold in 2017, compared with 1.1 billion pounds of copper and 1.1 million ounces of gold in 2016. Lower copper sales volumes in 2017 primarily reflected the impact of regulatory restrictions on PT-FI’s concentrate exports at the beginning of 2017, partly offset by higher copper ore grades. Higher gold sales volumes in 2017 primarily reflected higher gold ore grades.2022.


As PT-FI transitions mining from the open pit to underground, production is expected to be significantly lower in 2019 and 2020, compared to 2018. Metal production is expected to improve significantly by 2021 following a ramp-up period. Consolidated sales volumes from Indonesia mining are expected to approximate 615 million pounds of copper and 785 thousand ounces of gold in 2019. Indonesia mining's projected sales volumes and unit net cash costs for the year 2019 are dependent on a number of factors, including operational performance, timing of shipments, workforce productivity and the Indonesian government’s extension of PT-FI’s export license. PT-FI has applied for a one-year extension of its export license, which currently expires on February 16, 2019.

Unit Net Cash Costs. Unit net cash costs per pound of copper is a measure intended to provide investors with information about the cash-generating capacity of our mining operations expressed on a basis relating to the

primary metal product for our respective operations. We use this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring operating performance by our mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This measure is presented by other metal mining companies, although our measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.



91

Gross Profit per Pound of Copper and per Ounce of Gold
The following tables summarizetable summarizes the unit net cash (credits) costs and gross profit per pound of copper and per ounce of gold at our Indonesia mining operations for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2018.2021. Refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for an explanation of “by-product” and “co-product” methods and a reconciliation of unit net cash (credits) costs per pound to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements.
 20212020
 By-
Product
Co-Product MethodBy-
Product
Co-Product Method
MethodCopperGoldMethodCopperGold
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.34 $4.34 $1,796 $3.08 $3.08 $1,832 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash      
and other costs shown below1.49 1.03 424 1.88 1.13 674 
Gold and silver credits(1.95)— — (2.03)— — 
Treatment charges0.24 0.17 69 0.27 0.17 98 
Export duties0.17 0.11 47 0.12 0.07 41 
Royalty on metals0.24 0.17 67 0.19 0.11 72 
Unit net cash costs0.19 1.48 607 0.43 1.48 885 
DD&A0.80 0.55 228 0.72 0.43 259 
Noncash and other costs, net0.27 a0.18 77 0.11 b0.07 41 
Total unit costs1.26 2.21 912 1.26 1.98 1,185 
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on
prior period open sales0.05 0.05 (3)(0.03)(0.03)
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.07)(0.05)(19)(0.01)(0.01)(5)
Gross profit per pound/ounce$3.06 $2.13 $862 $1.78 $1.06 $647 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,316 1,316  804 804  
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)  1,349   842 
 2018 2017
 
By-
Product
 Co-Product Method By-
Product
 Co-Product Method
 Method Copper Gold Method Copper Gold
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.89
 $2.89
 $1,254
 $3.00
 $3.00
 $1,268
Site production and delivery, before net noncash           
and other costs shown below1.48
 0.77
 335
 1.57
 0.94
 396
Gold and silver credits(2.69) 
 
 (2.05) 
 
Treatment charges0.26
 0.14
 59
 0.27
 0.16
 67
Export duties0.16
 0.08
 36
 0.12
 0.07
 30
Royalty on metals0.21
 0.11
 48
 0.17
 0.10
 47
Unit net cash (credits) costs(0.58) 1.10
 478
 0.08
 1.27
 540
DD&A0.54
 0.28
 121
 0.57
 0.34
 142
Noncash and other costs, net0.21
a 
0.11
 48
 0.17
b 
0.10
 42
Total unit costs0.17
 1.49
 647
 0.82
 1.71
 724
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on           
prior period open sales(0.03) (0.03) 7
 0.04
 0.04
 6
PT Smelting intercompany profit (loss)0.04
 0.03
 12
 (0.02) (0.01) (7)
Gross profit per pound/ounce$2.73
 $1.40
 $626
 $2.20
 $1.32
 $543
            
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,130
 1,130
   981
 981
  
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)    2,366
     1,540
a.Includes $0.20 per pound of copper primarily associated with PT-FI net charges (refer to “Consolidated Results” for a summary of these charges).
b.Includes $0.12 per pound of copper of costs charged directly to production and delivery costs as a result of workforce reductions.

a.Includes charges totaling $0.26 per pound of copper associated with an ARO adjustment.
b.Includes COVID-19 related costs (including one-time incremental employee benefits and health and safety costs) totaling $0.02 per pound of copper.

A significant portion of PT-FI’s costs are fixed and unit costs vary depending on volumes and other factors. As a result of higher gold and silver credits and sales volumes, Indonesia hadPT-FI’s unit net cash (credits) costs (including gold and silver credits) of $(0.58)$0.19 per pound of copper in 2018, compared with $0.082021, were lower than unit net cash costs of $0.43 per pound in 2017.2020, primarily reflecting higher copper and gold sales volumes.


Treatment charges vary with the volume of metals sold and the price of copper, and royalties vary with the volume
of metals sold and the prices of copper and gold.


PT-FI’s export duties totaled $180$218 million in 2018, $1152021 and $93 million in 2017 and $96 million in 2016,2020, and PT-FI’s royalties totaled $238$319 million in 2018, $1732021 and $153 million in 2017 and $131 million2020. PT-FI will continue to pay export duties until development progress for additional smelting capacity in 2016.Indonesia exceeds 50 percent. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of PT-FI’s export duties and royalties.


Because certain assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis, PT-FI’s unit depreciation rate may vary with asset additions and the level of copper production and sales. DD&A per pound of copper under they by-product method was $0.80 in 2021, compared with $0.72 in 2020, primarily reflecting significant underground development assets placed in service.

Revenue adjustments primarily result from changes in prices on provisionally priced copper sales recognized in prior periods. Refer to “Consolidated Results - Revenues” for further discussion of adjustments to prior period provisionally priced copper sales.


PT Smelting intercompany profit (loss)loss represents the change in the deferral of 25 percent of PT-FI’s profit on sales to PT Smelting.Smelting (25.0 percent prior to April 30, 2021, and 39.5 percent thereafter). Refer to “Operations - Smelting & Refining” below for further discussion.


Because
92

Assuming an average gold price of $1,300$1,800 per ounce for 20192022 and achievement of current sales volume and cost estimates, unit net cash costs (net of(including gold and silver credits) for Indonesia miningPT-FI are expected to approximate $1.55$0.18 per pound of copper in 2019. Unit net cash costs are expected to decline significantly following the ramp-up2022. The impact of production. Indonesia mining’sprice changes during 2022 on PT-FI’s average unit net cash costs for the year 2019 would change by approximately $0.06approximate $0.09 per pound of copper for each $50$100 per ounce change in the average price of gold.

 2017 2016
 By-
Product
 Co-Product Method By-
Product
 Co-Product Method
 Method Copper Gold Method Copper Gold
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3.00
 $3.00
 $1,268
 $2.32
 $2.32
 $1,237
Site production and delivery, before net noncash           
and other costs shown below1.57
 0.94
 396
 1.61
 1.04
 553
Gold and silver credits(2.05) 
 
 (1.30) 
 
Treatment charges0.27
 0.16
 67
 0.28
 0.18
 97
Export duties0.12
 0.07
 30
 0.09
 0.06
 31
Royalty on metals0.17
 0.10
 47
 0.13
 0.07
 47
Unit net cash costs0.08
 1.27
 540
 0.81
 1.35
 728
DD&A0.57
 0.34
 142
 0.36
 0.24
 125
Noncash and other costs, net0.17
a 
0.10
 42
 0.05
 0.03
 17
Total unit costs0.82
 1.71
 724
 1.22
 1.62
 870
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing on           
prior period open sales0.04
 0.04
 6
 
 
 16
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.02) (0.01) (7) (0.02) (0.02) (8)
Gross profit per pound/ounce$2.20
 $1.32
 $543
 $1.08
 $0.68
 $375
            
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)981
 981
   1,054
 1,054
  
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)    1,540
     1,054
a.Includes $0.12 per pound of copper of costs charged directly to productionPT-FI’s projected sales volumes and delivery costs as a result of workforce reductions.

Unit net cash costs (net of gold and silver credits) for our Indonesia mining operations of $0.08 per pound of copper in 2017 were lower than unit net cash costs of $0.81 per pound in 2016, primarily reflecting higher gold and silver credits.

Higher DD&A in 2017, compared with 2016, primarily related to higher amortization of asset retirement costs associated with revised estimates atfor the end of 2016 for an overburden stockpile. Because certain assetsyear 2022 are depreciateddependent on a straight-line basis,number of factors, including operational performance, timing of shipments and the Indonesia government’s extension of PT-FI’s unit depreciation rate variesexport permit. In March 2021, PT-FI received a one-year extension of its export license through March 15, 2022. Refer to Note 12 and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for a discussion of the administrative fine levied by the Indonesia government on PT-FI for failing to achieve physical development progress on the greenfield smelter and ongoing discussions with the levelIndonesia government regarding a deferred schedule for the completion of copper production and sales.the greenfield smelter.


Molybdenum Mines
We have two wholly owned molybdenum mines in Colorado - the Henderson underground mine and the Climax open-pit mine, both in Colorado.mine. The Henderson and Climax mines produce high-purity, chemical-grade molybdenum concentrate, which is typically further processed into value-added molybdenum chemical products. The majority of the molybdenum concentrate produced at the Henderson and Climax mines, as well as from our North America and South America copper mines, is processed at our own conversion facilities.


Operating and Development Activities. Production from the Molybdenum mines totaled 3530 million pounds of molybdenum in 2018, 322021 and 24 million pounds in 2017 and 26 million pounds2020. The increase in 2016. Refer2021, compared with 2020, primarily reflects higher ore grades. We plan to “Consolidated Results”increase mining rates at the Climax mine in 2022 to provide options to increase volumes in response to market demand for our consolidated molybdenum operating data, which includes sales of molybdenum produced at our Molybdenum mines, and from our North America and South America copper mines, and refer to “Outlook” for projected consolidated molybdenum sales volumes.molybdenum.


Unit Net Cash Costs Per Pound of Molybdenum. Unit net cash costs per pound of molybdenum is a measure intended to provide investors with information about the cash-generating capacity of our mining operations expressed on a basis relating to the primary metal product for our respective operations. We use this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring operating performance by our mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or

as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This measure is presented by other metals mining companies, although our measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.


Average unitUnit net cash costs for our molybdenumMolybdenum mines totaled $8.77of $8.87 per pound of molybdenum in 2018, $7.712021 were lower than $9.50 per pound in 2017 and $8.28 per pound in 2016. The increase in the average unit net cash costs for molybdenum in 2018, compared to 2017,2020, primarily reflectedreflecting higher operating rates and lower ore grades. The decrease in the average unit net cash costs for molybdenum in 2017, compared to 2016, primarily reflected higher sales volumes. Based on current sales volume and cost estimates, average unit net cash costs for the Molybdenum mines are expected to approximate $8.90$12.50 per pound of molybdenum in 2022. The increase in expected unit net cash costs for the year 2019.2022, compared with 2021, primarily reflects higher mining and input costs. Refer to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for a reconciliation of unit net cash costs per pound to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements.


Smelting & Refining
We wholly own and operate athe Miami smelter in Arizona, (Miami smelter), athe El Paso refinery in Texas (El Paso refinery) and a smelter and refinery in Spain (Atlantic Copper). Additionally, PT-FI owns 25has a 39.5 percent ownership interest in PT Smelting and expects its ownership to increase to a majority interest upon completion of a smelterthe project to expand PT Smelting’s smelting capacity. See “Indonesia Smelter Capacity” above for additional information regarding the PT Smelting expansion and refineryNote 13 for information regarding the tolling agreement effective in Gresik, Indonesia (PT Smelting).2023. Treatment charges for smelting and refining copper concentrate consist of a base rate per pound of copper and per ounce of gold and are generally fixed. Treatment charges represent a cost to our mining operations and income to Atlantic Copper and PT Smelting. Thus, higher treatment charges benefit our smelter operations and adversely affect our mining operations. Our North America copper mines are less significantly affected by changes in treatment charges because these operations are largely integrated with our Miami smelter and El Paso refinery. Through this form of downstream integration, we are assured placement of a significant portion of our concentrate production.


Our Miami smelter processes concentrate produced by our U.S. mines and also provides acid for copper leaching
operations. During 2021, we incurred charges totaling $87 million associated with a major maintenance turnaround at our Miami smelter, which were higher than original estimates as a result of extended downtime to address additional required maintenance work, the COVID-19 pandemic and weather events. The next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for the first half of 2024.
93

Atlantic Copper smelts and refines copper concentrate and markets refined copper and precious metals in slimes. Following is a summaryan allocation of Atlantic Copper’s concentrate purchases from unaffiliated third parties and our copper mining operations for the threetwo years ended December 31, 2018:2021:
 20212020
Third parties66 %79 %
North America copper mines18 10 
Indonesia mining
South America mining
 100 %100 %
 2018 2017 2016
Third parties77% 67% 77%
North America copper mines14
 18
 13
South America mining5
 15
 7
Indonesia mining4
 
 3
 100% 100% 100%


Atlantic Copper’s major maintenance turnarounds typically occur approximately every eight years, with shorter-term maintenance turnarounds in the interim. Atlantic Copper last completed a major maintenance turnaround in 2013 and most recently completed a 16-day maintenance turnaround in 2019. The next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for the first half of 2022.

Atlantic Copper has take-or-pay contractual obligations for the procurement of copper concentrate totaling $3.1 billion at December 31, 2021, that provide for deliveries of specified volumes at market-based prices.

PT-FI’s contract with PT Smelting provides for PT-FI to supply 100 percent of the copper concentrate requirements (subject to a minimum or maximum treatment charge rate) necessary for PT Smelting to produce 205,000 metric tons of copper annually on a priority basis. PT-FI may also sell copper concentrate to PT Smelting at market rates for quantities in excess of 205,000 metric tons of copper annually. PT-FI supplied 90100 percent of PT Smelting’s concentrate requirements in 2018, 932021 and 74 percent in 2017 and 88 percent in 2016.2020. PT Smelting processed 3841 percent in 2018, 46 percent in 2017 and 42 percent in 2016 of PT-FI’s concentrate production.production in 2021and50 percent of such production in 2020.


In December 2021, PT Smelting produced 258,800 metric tons of copper anode from its smelter and 257,600 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2018; 245,800 metric tons of copper anode from its smelter and 247,800 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2017; and 255,700 metric tons of copper anode from its smelter and 241,700 metric tons of copper cathode from its refinery in 2016.

In early 2017, the Indonesian government issued new regulations to address exports of unrefined metals, including copper concentrate and anode slimes, and other matters related to the mining sector. These regulations permit the export of anode slimes, which is necessary for PT Smelting to continue operating. Asreceived a result of labor disturbances and a delay in the renewal of its export license for anode slimes, PT Smelting’s operations were shut down from mid-January 2017 until early March 2017. PT Smelting has applied for a one-year12-month extension of its anodeanodes slimes export license, which currently expires February 26, 2019.December 9, 2022, subject to review and approval by the Indonesia government every 6 months.


PT Smelting’s maintenance turnarounds (which range from two weeks to a month to complete) typically are expected to occur approximately every two years, with short-termshorter-term maintenance turnarounds in the interim. PT Smelting completed a 25-day maintenance turnaround during 2016, and a 30-day maintenance turnaround during 2018. In addition to its scheduled annual maintenance in November 2018, PT Smelting also experienced downtime in December 2018 caused by unscheduled maintenance at its sole-source oxygen supplier. This resulted in a

temporary shutdown of PT Smelting’s operations in December 2018. The2020, and the next major maintenance turnaround is scheduled for 2020.the second half of 2022. In addition, PT Smelting has a planned 75-day shutdown scheduled for the first half of 2023 associated with its expansion project.


We defer recognizing profits on sales from our mining operations to Atlantic Copper and on 25 percent of PT-FI’s sales to PT Smelting (on 25.0 percent prior to April 30, 2021, and 39.5 percent thereafter) until final sales to third parties occur. Changes in these deferrals attributable to variability in intercompany volumes resulted in net (reductions) additions (reductions)to operating income totaling $(188) million ($(106) million to net income attributable to common stock of $42stock) in 2021 and $(7) million ($0.03 per share) ($1 million to net income attributable to common stock) in 2018, $(21) million ($(0.01) per share) in 2017 and $(8) million ($(0.01) per share) in 2016.2020. Our net deferred profits on our inventories at Atlantic Copper and PT Smelting to be recognized in future periods’ net income attributable to common stock totaled $31$175 million at December 31, 2018. Net additions to net income attributable to common stock for fourth-quarter 2018 totaled $46 million; based on our current projections, we don’t expect any significant adjustments in first-quarter 2019.2021. Quarterly variations in ore grades, the timing of intercompany shipments and changes in product prices will result in variability in our net deferred profits and quarterly earnings. No significant changes in deferred profits are expected in the first quarter of 2022.


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY


Our consolidated operating cash flows vary with sales volumes; prices realized from copper, gold and molybdenum; our sales volumes;molybdenum sales; production costs; income taxes; other working capital changes; and other factors. A large component of our production costs are related to energy. See “Consolidated Results” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for further discussion of our energy requirements and related costs.

Our operating cash flows during 2021 primarily reflected strong operating and financial performance and favorable copper prices. During 2022, we expect to grow production and sales volumes while continuing to execute our operating plans, which we expect will provide strong cash flows to support advancement of organic growth initiatives and continue cash returns to shareholders under our established financial policy, based on a favorable operational and market outlook.
94

We believe that we have a high-quality portfolio of long-lived copper assets positioned to generate long-term value. We haveDuring fourth-quarter 2021, PT-FI successfully ramped-up production from its underground mining operations and achieved quarterly copper and volumes approximating 100 percent of the projected annualized level, as well as commenced a project to developlong-term mine development activities for its Kucing Liar deposit at the Grasberg minerals district. Production from the Lone Star oxide ores near thecopper leach project at our Safford operation is exceeding initial design capacity with production totaling approximately 235 million pounds in eastern Arizona, and PT-FI has several projects in the Grasberg minerals district related to the development of its large-scale, long-lived, high-grade underground ore bodies (refer to “Operations - Indonesia Mining” for further discussion of PT-FI’s transition mining from the open pit to underground).2021. We are also pursuing otherevaluating organic growth opportunities to enhance net present values, and we continue to advance studies for future developmentexpansion of certain of our copper resources,operations in North America and South America, including at Bagdad, Lone Star and El Abra, the timing of which will be dependent on, among other things, market conditions.


As presentedBased on current sales volume, cost and metal price estimates discussed in “Outlook”, our projected capital expenditures for 2019 are approximately $0.6 billion higher than projected operatingavailable cash flows. A large portion of the capital expenditures relate to projects that are expected to add significant production and cash flow in future periods, enabling us to generate operating cash flows exceeding capital expenditures in future years. We have cash on hand and the financial flexibility to fund these expenditures and will continue to be disciplined in deploying capital. Subject to future commodity prices for copper, gold and molybdenum, we expect estimatedequivalents plus our projected consolidated operating cash flows in 2019, plus available cash and availability underof $8.0 billion for the year 2022 exceed our credit facility, to be sufficient to fund our budgetedexpected consolidated capital expenditures cash dividends, noncontrolling interest distributionsof $4.7 billion (which includes $2.0 billion for major projects and $1.4 billion for the Indonesia smelter projects) and other expected cash requirements for the year.year, including share repurchases, noncontrolling interest distributions, income tax payments, common stock dividends (base and variable) and debt repayments.


We believe that our cash generating capability and financial condition, which includes $8.1 billion of consolidated cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2021, together with $3.5 billion available under our FCX revolving credit facility, will be adequate to meet our operating, investing and financing needs over the next several years. Expenditures for the Indonesia smelter projects are currently being funded by PT-FI’s new $1.0 billion unsecured bank credit facility and additional debt financing is being evaluated. Refer to “Outlook” for further discussion of projected operating cash flows and capital expenditures for 2019.2022 and to “Debt” below and Note 8 for further discussion of PT-FI’s credit facility.


Financial Policy. In February 2021, our Board adopted a financial policy for the allocation of cash flows aligned with our strategic objectives of maintaining a strong balance sheet and increasing cash returns to shareholders while advancing opportunities for future growth.

In February 2021, the Board reinstated a cash dividend on our common stock (base dividend) at an annual rate of $0.30 per share, and following achievement of our net debt target in the range of $3.0 billion to $4.0 billion (excluding debt for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia), in November 2021 the Board approved the implementation of a performance-based payout framework, including (i) a new $3.0 billion share repurchase program and (ii) a variable cash dividend on common stock for 2022 at an expected annual rate of $0.30 per share. The combined annual rate of the base dividend and the variable dividend is expected to total $0.60 per share for 2022. Based on current shares outstanding totaling 1.5 billion, the total common stock dividends (base and variable) for 2022 are expected to approximate $0.9 billion. Refer to “Financing Activities” below for further discussion.

In December 2021, our Board declared dividends totaling $0.15 per share on our common stock (including a $0.075 per share quarterly base cash dividend and a $0.075 per share quarterly variable cash dividend), which was paid on February 1, 2022, to shareholders of record as of January 14, 2022. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and “Cautionary Statement” below for further discussion.

Cash
Following is a summary of the U.S. and international components of consolidated cash and cash equivalents available to the parent company, net of noncontrolling interests’ share, taxes and other costs at December 31, 20182021 (in billions):
Cash at domestic companies$3.2
 
Cash at international operations1.0
 
Total consolidated cash and cash equivalents4.2
 
Noncontrolling interests’ share(0.4) 
Cash, net of noncontrolling interests’ share$3.8
 
Withholding taxes and other
a 
Net cash available$3.8
 
a.Rounds to less than $0.1 billion.
Cash at domestic companies$5.2 
Cash at international operations2.9 
Total consolidated cash and cash equivalents8.1 
Noncontrolling interests’ share(0.9)
Cash, net of noncontrolling interests’ share$7.2 
Withholding taxes(0.2)

Net cash available$7.0 


95

Cash held at our international operations is generally used to support our foreign operations’ capital expenditures, operating expenses, debt repayments, working capital and other tax payments, or other cash needs. Management believes that sufficient liquidity is available in the U.S. from cash balances and availability from our revolving credit facility. We have not elected to permanently reinvest earnings from our foreign subsidiaries, and we have recorded deferred tax liabilities for foreign earnings that are available to be repatriated to the U.S. From time to time, our foreign subsidiaries distribute earnings to the U.S. through dividends that are subject to applicable withholding taxes and noncontrolling interests’ share. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for further discussion of our holding company structure.



Debt
At December 31, 2018,2021, consolidated debt totaled $11.1$9.5 billion, with a related weighted-average interest rate of 4.554.6 percent. We had no borrowings, $13$8 million in letters of credit issued and approximately $3.5 billion available under our FCX revolving credit facility at December 31, 2018. 2021.

On December 1, 2021, we redeemed all of our outstanding $524 million aggregate principal amount of 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022 at a redemption price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Our next senior note maturity is March 2023, with redemption rights at par beginning in December 2022.

In September 2021, Cerro Verde elected to prepay $200 million on its term loan, reducing the outstanding balance to $325 million, which matures in June 2022.

In July 2021, PT-FI entered into a $1.0 billion, five-year, unsecured bank credit facility (consisting of a $667 million term loan and a $333 million revolving credit facility) to fund projects associated with its commitment to construct additional smelting capacity in Indonesia. As of December 31, 2021, $443 million ($432 million net of debt issuance costs) was drawn under the PT-FI term loan and no amounts were drawn under the revolving credit facility.

Refer to “Financing Activities” below and Note 8 for further discussion of debt.the above items and for information regarding our debt arrangements.


Operating Activities
We generated consolidated operating cash flows of $3.9$7.7 billion in 2018 (net of $0.62021 (including $0.8 billion from working capital and other sources) and $3.0 billion in 2020 (including $0.7 billion from working capital uses and timing of other tax payments), $4.7 billion in 2017 (including $0.6 billion in working capital sources and timing of other tax payments) and$3.7 billion in 2016 (including $87 million in working capital sources and timing of other tax payments)sources).


Lower operating cash flows for 2018, compared with 2017, primarily reflected an increase in working capital uses mostly because of timing of international income tax payments. Higher operating cash flows for 2017,2021, compared with 2016,2020, primarily reflected the impact ofreflect increased copper and gold volumes, higher copper and molybdenum prices and an increase in working capital sources fromthe timing of tax payments. We have estimated 2021 final income tax refundspayments primarily in Indonesia and other tax receivable collections, partly offset by increasesPeru due in inventories.the first half of 2022 totaling approximately $1.3 billion.


Investing Activities
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures, including capitalized interest, totaled $2.0$2.1 billion in 2018, for the year 2021, including $1.25 billion for major projects, and $2.0 billion for the year 2020, including $1.2 billion for major mining projects; $1.4 billionprojects. Major projects were primarily associated with underground development activities in 2017, including $0.9 billion for major mining projects;the Grasberg minerals district.

A large portion of the capital expenditures relate to projects that are expected to add significant production and $2.8 billioncash flow in 2016, consisting of $1.6 billion for mining operations (including $1.2 billion for major projects) and $1.2 billion for oil and gas operations.

Higherfuture periods, enabling us to continue to generate operating cash flows exceeding capital expenditures in 2018, compared with 2017, primarily reflected development of Safford’s Lone Star oxide project. Lower capital expenditures in2017, compared with 2016, primarily reflected a decrease in oil and gas exploration and development activities as a result of the sale of substantially all of our oil and gas properties in late 2016.

future years. Refer to “Outlook” for further discussion of projected capital expenditures for 2019.2022.


Acquisitions and Dispositions.Proceeds from Sales of Assets. In December 2018,September 2021, we completed the transactionsale of our remaining Freeport Cobalt assets to Jervois Global Limited (Jervois) for $208 million, including net cash proceeds of $150 million and shares of Jervois, and in December 2021, we collected $50 million in consideration associated with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights2019 sale of the Timok exploration project. Proceeds from sales of other assets totaled $47 million in 2021.

In 2020, we sold the Kisanfu undeveloped exploration project for $550 million and share ownership. In connectioncollected proceeds of $45 million related to the 2019 sale of the Timok exploration project. Proceeds from sales of other assets totaled $109 million in 2020 primarily related to contingent consideration associated with the transaction, PT-FI acquired Rio Tinto’s Joint Venture interests for $3.5 billion. In addition, we received proceeds2016 sale of $350 million forthe Tenke Fungurume Mining assets and the sale of 100 percent of our interests in PTI and $107 million from Rio Tinto for its share of the 2018 joint venture cash flows.royalty assets.

In 2016, proceeds, net of closing adjustments, from asset sales totaled $6.4 billion, primarily associated with the sales of our interest in TFHL; oil and gas properties; an additional 13 percent undivided interest in Morenci; and an interest in the Timok exploration project in Serbia.


Refer to Note 2 for further discussiondiscussion.

96


Loans to PT Smelting for Expansion. PT-FI made loans to PT Smelting totaling $36 million in 2021 to fund PT Smelting’s expansion project. Refer to “Operations - Indonesia Mining” for further discussion.

Acquisition of Minority Interest in PT Smelting. On April 30, 2021, PT-FI acquired 14.5 percent of the outstanding common stock of PT Smelting for $33 million, increasing its ownership interest from 25.0 percent to 39.5 percent.

Financing Activities
Debt Transactions. Net repayments of debt in 20182021 totaled $2.1$260 million, primarily associated with the $524 billion primarily consistingredemption of $1.4 billion for senior notesour 3.55% Senior Notes due March 2018 and $454 million for senior notes due in 2022 and 2023.the repayment of $200 million under Cerro Verde’s term loan, partly offset by borrowings of $432 million under the PT-FI term loan.


Net repayments of debt in 20172020 totaled $2.9 billion,$193 million, primarily for the redemption and repayment of senior notes.

Net repayments of debt in 2016 totaled $3.9 billion, primarily forreflecting the repayment of an unsecured bank$305 million under Cerro Verde’s term loanloan. During 2020, we also completed the sale of $2.8 billion of senior notes and payments onused most of the Cerro Verde credit facility.net proceeds to purchase and redeem senior notes maturing in 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The remaining net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.


Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of debt transactions.


Equity Transactions. In December 2018, an aggregate 40 percent share ownership in PT-FI was issued to PT InalumCash Dividends and PTI, for $3.5 billion. See Note 2 for further discussion.

In 2016, net proceeds from the sale of common stock totaled $1.5 billion, reflecting sales of our common stock under registered at-the-market equity offerings. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion of equity transactions.


Dividends. In February 2018, the Board reinstated a cash dividend on our common stock.Distributions Paid. We paid cash dividends on our common stock totaling $218$331 million in 2018. On December 19, 2018, we declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share on our common stock, which was paid on February 1, 2019, to shareholders of record as of January 15, 2019.2021 and $73 million in 2020. The declaration and payment of dividends (base or variable) is at the discretion of ourthe Board and will depend uponon our financial results, cash requirements, futurebusiness prospects, global economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our Board.annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, “Cautionary Statement” below and discussion of our financial policy above.


Dividends paid on our common stock totaling $2 million in 2017 and $6 million in 2016 related to accumulated dividends paid for vested stock-based compensation.

Cash dividends and other distributions paid to noncontrolling interests at PT-FI and Cerro Verde totaled $278$583 million in 2018, $174 million2021. Based on the estimates discussed in 2017“Outlook,” we currently expect cash dividends and $693 milliondistributions paid to noncontrolling interests to exceed $1.4 billion in 2016 (including $582 million for the redemption of a redeemable2022. There were no cash dividends or distributions to noncontrolling interest). These payments willinterests paid in 2020. Cash dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests vary based on the operating results and cash requirements of our consolidated subsidiaries.


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have contractual and other long-term obligations, including debt maturities based on principal amounts, whichTreasury Stock Purchases. In fourth-quarter 2021, we expect to fund with available cash, projected operating cash flows, availabilityacquired 12.7 million shares under our revolving credit facilityshare repurchase program for a total cost of $488 million, $38.32 per share. Through February 15, 2022, we have acquired 18.2 million shares under our share repurchase program for a total cost of $710 million, $39.10 per share, and $2.3 billion remains available. The timing and amount of share repurchases is at the discretion of management and will depend on a variety of factors. The share repurchase program may be modified, increased, suspended or future financing transactions, if necessary. Following is a summaryterminated at any time at the Board’s discretion. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of these various obligations atour annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in millions):2021, “Cautionary Statement” below and discussion of our financial policy above.

 Total 2019 
2020 to
2021
 
2022 to
2023
 Thereafter
Debt maturities$11,152
 $17
 $2,124
 $5,074
 $3,937
Scheduled interest payment obligationsa
4,867
 508

969
 661
 2,729
ARO and environmental obligationsb
8,069
 449
 809
 532
 6,279
Take-or-pay contractsc
2,920
 2,144
 381
 94
 301
Operating lease obligations365
 53
 80
 61
 171
Totald
$27,373
 $3,171
 $4,363
 $6,422
 $13,417
Contributions from Noncontrolling Interests. PT-FI received equity contributions from PT Inalum for their share of capital spending on the underground mine development projects in the Grasberg minerals district totaling $182 million in 2021 and $156 million in 2020.
a.Scheduled interest payment obligations were calculated using stated coupon rates for fixed-rate debt and interest rates applicable at December 31, 2018, for variable-rate debt.
b.Represents estimated cash payments, on an undiscounted and unescalated basis, associated with ARO and environmental activities (including $476 million for our oil and gas operations). The timing and the amount of these payments could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, changes in scope and timing of ARO activities, the settlement of environmental matters and as actual spending occurs. Refer to Note 12 for additional discussion of environmental and ARO matters.
c.Represents contractual obligations for purchases of goods or services agreements enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, and primarily include the procurement of copper concentrate ($1.5 billion), cobalt ($0.5 billion), electricity ($0.4 billion) and transportation services ($0.3 billion). Some of our take-or-pay contracts are settled based on the prevailing market rate for the service or commodity purchased, and in some cases, the amount of the actual obligation may change over time because of market conditions. Obligations for copper concentrate provide for deliveries of specified volumes to Atlantic Copper at market-based prices. Obligations for cobalt hydroxide intermediate provide for deliveries of specified volumes to Freeport Cobalt at market-based prices. Electricity obligations are primarily for long-term power purchase agreements in North America and contractual minimum demand at the South America mines. Transportation obligations are primarily for South America contracted ocean freight.
d.This table excludes certain other obligations in our consolidated balance sheets, such as estimated funding for pension, postretirement and other employee benefit obligations as the funding may vary from year to year based on changes in the fair value of plan assets and actuarial assumptions, commitments and contingencies totaling $97

Stock-based awards. Following an increase in our stock price during 2021, proceeds from exercised stock options totaled $210 million and unrecognized tax benefits totaling $230 million where the timing of settlement is not determinable, and other less significant amounts. This table also excludes purchase orders for inventory and other goods and services, as purchase orders typically represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements.

In addition to our debt maturities and other contractual obligations discussed above, we have other commitments, which we expect to fund with available cash, projected operating cash flows, available credit facilities or future financing transactions, if necessary. These include (i) PT-FI’s commitment to provide one percent of its annual revenue for the development of the local people in its area of operations through the Freeport Partnership Fund for Community Development, (ii) Cerro Verde’s scheduled installment payments for disputed mining royalty assessments and (iii) other commercial commitments, including standby letters of credit, surety bonds and guarantees. Refer to Notes 12 and 13related employee taxes totaled $29 million. See Note 10 for furthera discussion of these commitments.stock-based awards.



CONTINGENCIES


Environmental
The cost of complying with environmental laws is a fundamental and substantial cost of our business. At December 31, 2018,2021, we had $1.5$1.7 billion recorded in our consolidated balance sheet for environmental obligations attributed to CERCLA or analogous state programs and for estimated future costs associated with environmental obligations that are considered probable based on specific facts and circumstances.



97

We incurred environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs (including our joint venture partners’ shares) to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations that affect our operations totaling $0.4$0.3 billion in 2018, $0.5 billion in 2017both 2021 and $0.4 billion in 2016.2020. For 2019,2022, we expect to incur approximately $0.5 billion of aggregate environmental capital expenditures and other environmental costs. The timing and amount of estimated payments could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, changes in scope and timing of reclamation and plug and abandonment activities, the settlement of environmental matters and the rate at which actual spending occurs on continuing matters.


Refer to Note 12Items 1. and 2. “Business and Properties,” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, Note 12 and “Critical Accounting Estimates - Environmental Obligations” above for further information about environmental regulation, including significant environmental matters.


Asset Retirement Obligations
We recognize AROs as liabilities when incurred, with the initial measurement at fair value. These obligations, which are initially estimated based on discounted cash flow estimates, are accreted to full value over time through charges to cost of sales. Mine reclamation costs for disturbances are recorded as an ARO and as a related asset retirement cost (ARC) (included in property, plant, equipment and mine development costs) in the period of disturbance. Oil and gas plugging and abandonment costs are recognized as an ARO and as a related ARC (included in oil and gas properties) in the period in which the well is drilled or acquired. For non-operating properties without mineral reserves, changes to the ARO are recorded in earnings. Our cost estimates are reflected on a third-party cost basis and comply with our legal obligation to retire tangible, long-lived assets. At December 31, 2018,2021, we had $2.5$2.7 billion recorded in our consolidated balance sheet for AROs, including $0.5$0.3 billion related to our oil and gas properties. Spending on AROs totaled $160$201 million in 2018, $712021and $156 million in 2017 and $1882020 (including $77 million in 2016 (including $832021 and $38 million in 2018, $30 million in 2017 and $133 million in 20162020 for our oil and gas operations). At our former Grasberg open-pit operations in Indonesia, we recorded an ARO adjustment of $397 million in 2021, with $340 million charged to production and delivery costs, as it relates to the depleted Grasberg open pit. For 2019,2022, we expect to incur approximately $0.3$0.2 billion in aggregate ARO payments (including $114 million$0.1 billion for our oil and gas operations). Refer to Note 12 and “Critical Accounting Estimates - Asset Retirement Obligations” above for further discussion.


Litigation and Other Contingencies
Refer to Notes 2 and 12, and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” contained in Part I Item 3. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for further discussion of contingencies associated with legal proceedings and other matters.


DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS


Commodity Price Risk
Our consolidated revenues from our mining operations include the sale of copper concentrate, copper cathode, copper rod, gold, molybdenum and other metals by our North America and South America mines, the sale of copper concentrate (which also contains significant quantities of gold and silver) by our Indonesia mining operations, the sale of molybdenum in various forms by our molybdenum operations, and the sale of copper cathode, copper anode and gold in anode and slimes by Atlantic Copper. Our financial results will vary with fluctuations in the market prices of the commodities we produce, primarily copper and gold, and to a lesser extent molybdenum and silver.molybdenum. For projected sensitivities of our operating cash flow to changes in commodity prices, refer to “Outlook.” World market prices for these commodities have fluctuated historically and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for further discussion of financial risks associated with fluctuations in the market prices of the commodities we sell.


During 2018,2021, our mined copper was sold 59 percent in concentrate, 21 percent as cathode and 20 percent as rod from North America operations. Substantially all of our copper concentrate and cathode sales contracts provide final copper pricing in a specified future month (generally one to four months from the shipment date) based primarily on quoted LME monthly average copper settlement prices. We receive market prices based on prices in the specified

future period, which results in price fluctuations recorded through revenues until the date of settlement. We record revenues and invoice customers at the time of shipment based on then-current LME prices, which results in an embedded derivative on our provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales that is adjusted to fair value through earnings each period, using the period-end forward prices, until final pricing on the date of settlement. To the extent final prices are higher or lower than what was recorded on a provisional basis, an increase or decrease to revenues is recorded each reporting period until the date of final pricing. Accordingly, in times of rising copper prices, our
98

revenues benefit from adjustments to the final pricing of provisionally priced sales pursuant to contracts entered into in prior periods; in times of falling copper prices, the opposite occurs.


Following are the favorable (unfavorable) favorable impacts of net adjustments to the prior years’ provisionally priced copper sales for the years ended December 31 (in millions, except per share amounts):
2018 2017 2016 2021 2020 
Revenues$(70) $81
 $5
Revenues$169 $(102)
Net income attributable to common stock$(31) $34
 $2
Net income attributable to common stock$65 $(42)
Net income per share attributable to common stock$(0.02) $0.02
 $
Net income per share attributable to common stock$0.04 $(0.03)


At December 31, 2018,2021, we had provisionally priced copper sales at our copper mining operations totaling 308397 million pounds of copper (net of intercompany sales and noncontrolling interests) recorded at an average price of $2.71$4.42 per pound, subject to final pricing over the next several months. We estimate that each $0.05 change in the price realized from the December 31, 2018,2021, provisional price recorded would have an approximate $10$12 million effect on 20192022 net income attributable to common stock. The LME copper settlement price closed at $2.79$4.36 per pound on January 31, 2019.2022.


Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The functional currency for most of our operations is the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of our revenues and a significant portion of our costs are denominated in U.S. dollars; however, some costs and certain asset and liability accounts are denominated in local currencies, including the IndonesianIndonesia rupiah, Australian dollar, Peruvian sol, Chilean peso and euro. We recognized foreign currency translation gains (losses) on balances denominated in foreign currencies totaling $14$66 million in 2018, $(5)2021 and$34 million in 2017 and $32 million in 2016, primarily at our Indonesia and South America mines.2020. Generally, our operating results are positively affected when the U.S. dollar strengthens in relation to those foreign currencies and are adversely affected when the U.S. dollar weakens in relation to those foreign currencies.


Following is a summary of estimated annual payments and the impact of changes in foreign currency rates on our annual operating costs:
Exchange Rate per $1
at December 31,
Estimated Annual Payments
10% Change in
Exchange Rate
(in millions of U.S. dollars)a
 20212020(in local currency)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)b
IncreaseDecrease
Indonesia      
Rupiah14,198 14,034 14.2 trillion$1,000 $(91)$111 
Australian dollar1.37 1.30 244 million$178 $(16)$20 
South America  
Peruvian sol4.00 3.62 2.9 billion$735 $(67)$82 
Chilean peso845 711 193 billion$228 $(21)$25 
Atlantic Copper  
Euro0.88 0.82 172 million$195 $(18)$22 
 
Exchange Rate per $1
at December 31,
 Estimated Annual Payments 
10% Change in
Exchange Rate
(in millions of U.S. dollars)a
 2018 2017 2016 (in local currency) 
(in millions of U.S. dollars)b
 Increase Decrease
Indonesia         
    
Rupiah14,409
 13,480
 13,369
 9.6 trillion $666
 $(61) $74
Australian dollar1.41
 1.28
 1.39
 311 million $221
 $(20) $25
South America             
Peruvian sol3.38
 3.25
 3.36
 2.3 billion $667
 $(61) $74
Chilean peso695
 615
 670
 179 billion $258
 $(23) $29
Atlantic Copper             
Euro0.87
 0.83
 0.95
 137 million $157
 $(14) $17
a.Reflects the estimated impact on annual operating costs assuming a 10 percent increase or decrease in the exchange rate reported at December 31, 2021.
a.Reflects the estimated impact on annual operating costs assuming a 10 percent increase or decrease in the exchange rate reported at December 31, 2018.
b.Based on exchange rates at December 31, 2018.

b.Based on exchange rates at December 31, 2021.

Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2018,2021, we had total debt maturities based on principal amounts of $11.2$9.5 billion, of which approximately 109 percent was variable-rate debt with interest rates primarily based on the London Interbank Offered Rate. Refer to “Risk Factors” contained in Part I, Item 1A. of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. The table below presents average interest rates for our scheduled maturities of principal for

our outstanding debt (excluding fair value adjustments) and the related fair values at December 31, 20182021 (in millions, except percentages):
 20222023202420252026ThereafterFair Value
Fixed-rate debt$$997 $735 $$$6,971 $9,819 
Average interest rate— %3.9 %4.5 %— %— %5.0 %4.9 %
Variable-rate debt$368 $— $— $133 $310 $— $811 
Average interest rate1.8 %— %— %2.2 %2.2 %— %2.0 %

99
 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Fair Value
Fixed-rate debt$5
 $1,004
 $614
 $1,897
 $2,653
 $3,812
 $9,076
Average interest rate0.8% 3.1% 3.9% 3.5% 4.7% 5.4% 4.5%
              
Variable-rate debt$12
 
 $505
 $525
 
 $125
 $1,163
Average interest rate1.7% 
 4.4% 4.4% 
 6.3% 4.6%


Table of Contents
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS


ReferWe did not adopt any new accounting standards in 2021.

NET DEBT

Net debt, which we define as consolidated debt less consolidated cash and cash equivalents, is intended to provide investors with information related to the performance-based payout framework in our financial policy, which requires achievement of a net debt target in the range of $3 billion to $4 billion (excluding project debt for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia). This information differs from consolidated debt determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for consolidated debt determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our net debt follows, which may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Current portion of debt$372 $34 
Long-term debt, less current portion9,078 9,677 
Consolidated debt9,450 a9,711 
Less: consolidated cash and cash equivalents8,068 3,657 
Net debt$1,382 $6,054 
a.Includes $432 million, net of debt issuance costs, for the PT-FI term loan (refer to Note 1 for discussion of recently issued accounting standards and their projected impact on our future financial statements and disclosures.8).

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Refer to Note 13 for discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements.

PRODUCT REVENUES AND PRODUCTION COSTS


Mining Product Revenues and Unit Net Cash Costs
Unit net cash costs per pound of copper and molybdenum are measures intended to provide investors with information about the cash-generating capacity of our mining operations expressed on a basis relating to the primary metal product for the respective operations. We use this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring operating performance by our mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These measures are presented by other metals mining companies, although our measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.


We present gross profit per pound of copper in the following tables using both a “by-product” method and a “co-product” method. We use the by-product method in our presentation of gross profit per pound of copper because (i) the majority of our revenues are copper revenues, (ii) we mine ore, which contains copper, gold, molybdenum and other metals, (iii) it is not possible to specifically assign all of our costs to revenues from the copper, gold, molybdenum and other metals we produce, (iv) it is the method used to compare mining operations in certain industry publications and (v) it is the method used by our management and the Board to monitor operations and to compare mining operations in certain industry publications. In the co-product method presentations, shared costs are allocated to the different products based on their relative revenue values, which will vary to the extent our metals sales volumes and realized prices change.


We show revenue adjustments for prior period open sales as separate line items. Because these adjustments do not result from current period sales, these amounts have been reflected separately from revenues on current period sales. Noncash and other costs, which are removed from site production and delivery costs in the calculation of unit net cash costs, consist of items such as stock-based compensation costs, start-up costs, inventory adjustments, long-lived asset impairments, idle facility costs, restructuring and/or unusual charges. As discussed above, gold, molybdenum and other metal revenues at copper mines are reflected as credits against site production and delivery costs in the by-product method. The following schedules are presentations under both the by-product and co-product methods together with reconciliations to amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements.









100

North America Copper Mines Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2021  
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopper
Molybdenuma
Otherb
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$6,174 

$6,174 $481 $120 $6,775 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
3,051 2,820 278 75 3,173 
By-product credits(479)— — — — 
Treatment charges135 130 — 135 
Net cash costs2,707 2,950 278 80 3,308 
DD&A368 340 21 368 
Metals inventory adjustments13 13 — — 13 
Noncash and other costs, net105 c102 105 
Total costs3,193 3,405 300 89 3,794 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
— — 
Gross profit$2,988 $2,776 $181 $31 $2,988 
     
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,436 1,436 
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
34 
Gross profit per pound of copper/molybdenum:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.30 $4.30 $14.14 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
2.13 1.96 8.17 
By-product credits(0.33)— — 
Treatment charges0.09 0.09 — 
Unit net cash costs1.89 2.05 8.17 
DD&A0.25 0.24 0.62 
Metals inventory adjustments0.01 0.01 — 
Noncash and other costs, net0.07 c0.07 0.03 
Total unit costs2.22 2.37 8.82 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
— — — 
Gross profit per pound$2.08 $1.93 $5.32 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported
  Metals
  ProductionInventory
Revenuesand DeliveryDD&AAdjustments
Totals presented above$6,775 $3,173 $368 $13 
Treatment charges(24)111 — — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 105 — — 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
— — — 
Eliminations and other67 72 — 
North America copper mines6,825 3,461 369 13 
Other miningd
22,229 14,395 1,562 
Corporate, other & eliminations(6,209)(5,840)67 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$22,845 $12,016 $1,998 $16 
a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes gold and silver product revenues and production costs.
c.Includes credits totaling $27 million ($0.02 per pound of copper) associated with refunds of Arizona transaction privilege taxes related to purchased electricity.
d.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.



101

Year Ended December 31, 2018    
(In millions) By-Product Co-Product Method
  Method Copper 
Molybdenuma
 
Otherb
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments $4,217
 $4,217
 $376
 $90
 $4,683
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 2,766
 2,522
 291
 52
 2,865
By-product credits (367) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges 150
 144
 
 6
 150
Net cash costs 2,549
 2,666
 291
 58
 3,015
DD&A 359
 327
 24
 8
 359
Noncash and other costs, net 94
 87
 6
 1
 94
Total costs 3,002
 3,080
 321
 67
 3,468
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
 (5) (5) 
 
 (5)
Gross profit $1,210
 $1,132
 $55
 $23
 $1,210
           
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds) 1,426
 1,426
      
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
     32
    
           
Gross profit per pound of copper/molybdenum:     
           
Revenues, excluding adjustments $2.96
 $2.96
 $11.64
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 1.94
 1.77
 9.03
    
By-product credits (0.26) 
 
    
Treatment charges 0.11
 0.10
 
    
Unit net cash costs 1.79
 1.87
 9.03
    
DD&A 0.25
 0.23
 0.73
    
Noncash and other costs, net 0.07
 0.06
 0.17
    
Total unit costs 2.11
 2.16
 9.93
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing          
on prior period open sales 
 
 
    
Gross profit per pound $0.85
 $0.80
 $1.71
    
           
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported        
(In millions)          
    Production      
  Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above $4,683
 $2,865
 $359
    
Treatment charges (30) 120
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net 
 94
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
 on prior period open sales
 (5) 
 
    
Eliminations and other 46
 49
 1
    
North America copper mines 4,694
 3,128
 360
    
Other miningc
 17,060
 11,853
 1,269
    
Corporate, other & eliminations (3,126) (3,290) 125
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements $18,628
 $11,691
 $1,754
    
a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.
Includes gold and silver product revenues and production costs.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.




North America Copper Mines Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2020  
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopper 
Molybdenuma
Otherb
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4,005 c$4,005 $281 $83 $4,369 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
2,700 2,529 223 44 2,796 
By-product credits(268)— — — — 
Treatment charges139 136 — 139 
Net cash costs2,571 2,665 223 47 2,935 
DD&A355 330 18 355 
Metals inventory adjustments52 49 — 52 
Noncash and other costs, net138 d133 138 
Total costs3,116 3,177 244 59 3,480 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(22)(22)— — (22)
Gross profit$867 $806 $37 $24 $867 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,420 1,420 
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
33 
Gross profit per pound of copper/molybdenum:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.82 c$2.82 $8.62 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1.90 1.78 6.84 
By-product credits(0.19)— — 
Treatment charges0.10 0.10 — 
Unit net cash costs1.81 1.88 6.84 
DD&A0.25 0.23 0.56 
Metals inventory adjustments0.03 0.03 — 
Noncash and other costs, net0.10 d0.10 0.09 
Total unit costs2.19 2.24 7.49 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(0.02)(0.02)— 
Gross profit per pound$0.61 $0.56 $1.13 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported      
   Metals
  Production Inventory
Revenuesand Delivery DD&AAdjustments
Totals presented above$4,369 $2,796 $355 $52 
Treatment charges(15)124 — — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 138 — — 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(22)—  — — 
Eliminations and other32 42 — — 
North America copper mines4,364 3,100  355 52 
Other mininge
13,642 10,595 1,103 16 
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,808)(3,664)70 28 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$14,198 $10,031 $1,528 $96 
Year Ended December 31, 2017    
(In millions) By-Product Co-Product Method
  Method Copper 
Molybdenuma
 
Otherb
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments $4,215
 $4,215
 $254
 $90
 $4,559
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 2,406
 2,256
 187
 51
 2,494
By-product credits (256) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges 157
 150
 
 7
 157
Net cash costs 2,307
 2,406
 187
 58
 2,651
DD&A 423
 397
 18
 8
 423
Noncash and other costs, net 89
 86
 2
 1
 89
Total costs 2,819
 2,889
 207
 67
 3,163
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
 4
 4
 
 
 4
Gross profit $1,400
 $1,330
 $47
 $23
 $1,400
           
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds) 1,481
 1,481
      
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
     33
    
           
Gross profit per pound of copper/molybdenum:     
           
Revenues, excluding adjustments $2.85
 $2.85
 $7.80
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 1.63
 1.52
 5.75
    
By-product credits (0.17) 
 
    
Treatment charges 0.10
 0.10
 
    
Unit net cash costs 1.56
 1.62
 5.75
    
DD&A 0.29
 0.27
 0.54
    
Noncash and other costs, net 0.06
 0.06
 0.07
    
Total unit costs 1.91
 1.95
 6.36
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing          
on prior period open sales 
 
 
    
Gross profit per pound $0.94
 $0.90
 $1.44
    
           
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported          
(In millions)          
    Production      
  Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above $4,559
 $2,494
 $423
    
Treatment charges (52) 105
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net 
 89
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
 4
 
 
    
Eliminations and other 54
 57
 2
    
North America copper mines 4,565
 2,745
 425
    
Other miningc
 14,921
 10,639
 1,195
    
Corporate, other & eliminations (3,083) (3,118) 94
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements $16,403
 $10,266
 $1,714
    
a.a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes gold and silver product revenues and production costs.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.





North America Copper Mines Product Revenues, Production Costscopper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes gold and Unit Net Cash Costssilver product revenues and production costs.
c.Includes reductions to revenues and average realized prices totaling $24 million ($0.02 per pound of copper) related to forward sales contracts covering 150 million pounds of copper sales for May and June 2020 at a fixed price of $2.34 per pound.
d.Includes charges totaling$32 million ($0.02 per pound of copper) primarily associated with the April 2020 revised operating plans (including employee separation costs) and the COVID-19 pandemic (including health and safety costs).
e.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.




102
Year Ended December 31, 2016    
(In millions) By-Product Co-Product Method
  Method Copper 
Molybdenuma
 
Otherb
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments $4,113
 $4,113
 $213
 $94
 $4,420
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 2,596
 2,458
 165
 58
 2,681
By-product credits (222) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges 193
 185
 
 8
 193
Net cash costs 2,567
 2,643
 165
 66
 2,874
DD&A 527
 496
 20
 11
 527
Noncash and other costs, net 85
 83
 2
 
 85
Total costs 3,179
 3,222
 187
 77
 3,486
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
 (1) (1) 
 
 (1)
Gross profit $933
 $890
 $26
 $17
 $933
           
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds) 1,836
 1,836
      
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
     33
    
           
Gross profit per pound of copper/molybdenum:     
           
Revenues, excluding adjustments $2.24
 $2.24
 $6.34
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash          
and other costs shown below 1.41
 1.34
 4.91
    
By-product credits (0.12) 
 
    
Treatment charges 0.11
 0.10
 
    
Unit net cash costs 1.40
 1.44
 4.91
    
DD&A 0.29
 0.27
 0.60
    
Noncash and other costs, net 0.04
 0.04
 0.06
    
Total unit costs 1.73
 1.75
 5.57
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing          
on prior period open sales 
 
 
    
Gross profit per pound $0.51
 $0.49
 $0.77
    
           
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported          
(In millions)          
    Production      
  Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above $4,420
 $2,681
 $527
    
Treatment charges (90) 103
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net 
 85
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
 (1) 
 
    
Eliminations and other 45
 45
 3
    
North America copper mines 4,374
 2,914
 530
    
Other miningc
 12,111
 9,290
 1,044
    
Corporate, other & eliminations (1,655) (1,517) 956
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements $14,830
 $10,687
 $2,530
    
a.Reflects sales of molybdenum produced by certain of the North America copper mines to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes gold and silver product revenues and production costs.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.



South America Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2021    
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopper
Othera
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4,585 $4,585 $383 $4,968 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
2,349 b2,175 219 2,394 
By-product credits(338)— — — 
Treatment charges140 140 — 140 
Royalty on metals10 10 
Net cash costs2,161 2,324 220 2,544 
DD&A413 379 34 413 
Noncash and other costs, net38 c36 38 
Total costs2,612 2,739 256 2,995 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
99 99 — 99 
Gross profit$2,072 $1,945 $127 $2,072 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,055 1,055 
Gross profit per pound of copper:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.34 $4.34 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
2.23 b2.06 
By-product credits(0.32)— 
Treatment charges0.13 0.13 
Royalty on metals0.01 0.01 
Unit net cash costs2.05 2.20 
DD&A0.39 0.37 
Noncash and other costs, net0.03 c0.03 
Total unit costs2.47 2.60 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
0.09 0.09 
Gross profit per pound$1.96 $1.83 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported   
  
  Production
Revenuesand DeliveryDD&A
Totals presented above$4,968 $2,394 $413 
Treatment charges(140)— — 
Royalty on metals(10)— — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 38 — 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
99 — — 
Eliminations and other(1)(3)— 
South America mining4,916 2,429 413 
Other miningd
24,138 15,427 1,518 
Corporate, other & eliminations(6,209)(5,840)67 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$22,845 $12,016 $1,998 
a.Includes silver sales of 3.7 million ounces ($24.73 per ounce average realized price). Also reflects sales of molybdenum produced by Cerro Verde to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes nonrecurring charges totaling $92 million ($0.09 per pound of copper) associated with labor-related charges at Cerro Verde for collective labor agreements reached with its hourly employees.
c.Includes credits totaling $26 million ($0.03 per pound) associated with favorable adjustments to prior-years’ profit sharing at Cerro Verde.
d.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.


103

Year Ended December 31, 2018       
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper 
Othera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3,593
 $3,593
 $352
 $3,945
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below2,244
b 
2,065
 226
 2,291
By-product credits(305) 
 
 
Treatment charges243
 243
 
 243
Royalty on metals8
 7
 1
 8
Net cash costs2,190
 2,315
 227
 2,542
DD&A546
 499
 47
 546
Noncash and other costs, net79
c 
75
 4
 79
Total costs2,815
 2,889
 278
 3,167
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
   on prior period open sales
(37) (37) 
 (37)
Gross profit$741
 $667
 $74
 $741
        
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,253
 1,253
    
        
Gross profit per pound of copper:   
        
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.87
 $2.87
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below1.79
b 
1.65
    
By-product credits(0.24) 
    
Treatment charges0.19
 0.19
    
Royalty on metals0.01
 0.01
    
Unit net cash costs1.75
 1.85
    
DD&A0.44
 0.40
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.06
c 
0.06
    
Total unit costs2.25
 2.31
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing       
on prior period open sales(0.03) (0.03)    
Gross profit per pound$0.59
 $0.53
    
        
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported       
(In millions)       
   Production    
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A  
Totals presented above$3,945
 $2,291
 $546
  
Treatment charges(243) 
 
  
Royalty on metals(8) 
 
  
Noncash and other costs, net
 79
 
  
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
   on prior period open sales
(37) 
 
  
Eliminations and other(2) (5) 
  
South America mining3,655
 2,365
 546
  
Other miningd
18,099
 12,616
 1,083
  
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,126) (3,290) 125
  
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$18,628
 $11,691
 $1,754
  
a.Includes silver sales of 4.5 million ounces ($15.20 per ounce average realized price). Also reflects sales of molybdenum produced by Cerro Verde to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.
Includes charges totaling $69 million ($0.06 per pound of copper) for Cerro Verde’s three-year CLA.
c.Includes charges totaling $14 million ($0.01 per pound of copper) at Cerro Verde associated with disputed royalties for prior years.
d.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.



South America Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2020     
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopper 
Othera
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2,976 $2,976 $209 $3,185 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1,816 

1,701 158 1,859 
By-product credits(166)— — — 
Treatment charges152 152 — 152 
Royalty on metals— 
Net cash costs1,808 1,859 158 2,017 
DD&A421 391 30 421 
Metals inventory adjustments— 
Noncash and other costs, net122 b115 122 
Total costs2,354 2,368 195 2,563 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(70)(70)— (70)
Gross profit$552 $538 $14 $552 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)976 976 
Gross profit per pound of copper:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3.05 $3.05 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1.86 

1.74 
By-product credits(0.17)— 
Treatment charges0.15 0.15 
Royalty on metals0.01 0.01 
Unit net cash costs1.85 1.90 
DD&A0.43 0.41 
Metals inventory adjustments— — 
Noncash and other costs, net0.13 b0.12 
Total unit costs2.41 2.43 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(0.07)(0.07)
Gross profit per pound$0.57 $0.55 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported     
   Metals
  Production Inventory
Revenuesand Delivery DD&AAdjustments
Totals presented above$3,185 $1,859 $421 $
Treatment charges(152)— — — 
Royalty on metals(6)— — — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 122  — — 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(70)—  — — 
Eliminations and other(2)(3)— — 
South America mining2,955 1,978  421 
Other miningc
15,051 11,717 1,037 65 
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,808)(3,664)70 28 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$14,198 $10,031 $1,528 $96 
a.Includes silver sales of 3.4 million ounces ($21.86 per ounce average realized price). Also reflects sales of molybdenum produced by Cerro Verde to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes charges totaling $91 million ($0.09 per pound of copper) primarily associated with idle facility (Cerro Verde) and contract cancellation costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and employee separation costs associated with the April 2020 revised operating plans.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.


104
Year Ended December 31, 2017       
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper 
Othera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3,668
 $3,668
 $267
 $3,935
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below1,960
 1,838
 171
 2,009
By-product credits(218) 
 
 
Treatment charges272
 272
 
 272
Royalty on metals8
 7
 1
 8
Net cash costs2,022
 2,117
 172
 2,289
DD&A525
 489
 36
 525
Noncash and other costs, net241
b 
224
 17
 241
Total costs2,788
 2,830
 225
 3,055
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
41
 41
 
 41
Gross profit$921
 $879
 $42
 $921
        
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,235
 1,235
    
        
Gross profit per pound of copper:   
        
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.97
 $2.97
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below1.59
 1.49
    
By-product credits(0.18) 
    
Treatment charges0.22
 0.22
    
Royalty on metals0.01
 0.01
    
Unit net cash costs1.64
 1.72
    
DD&A0.43
 0.39
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.19
b 
0.18
    
Total unit costs2.26
 2.29
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing       
on prior period open sales0.03
 0.03
    
Gross profit per pound$0.74
 $0.71
    
        
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported       
(In millions)       
   Production    
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A  
Totals presented above$3,935
 $2,009
 $525
  
Treatment charges(272) 
 
  
Royalty on metals(8) 
 
  
Noncash and other costs, net
 241
 
  
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
41
 
 
  
Eliminations and other(2) (6) 
  
South America mining3,694
 2,244
 525
  
Other miningc
15,792
 11,140
 1,095
  
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,083) (3,118) 94
  
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$16,403
 $10,266
 $1,714
  
a.Includes silver sales of 3.8 million ounces ($16.74 per ounce average realized price). Also reflects sales of molybdenum produced by Cerro Verde to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Includes charges totaling $203 million ($0.16 per pound of copper) at Cerro Verde associated with disputed royalties for prior years.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.


South America Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs

Year Ended December 31, 2016       
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper 
Othera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3,077
 $3,077
 $176
 $3,253
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below1,681
 1,601
 120
 1,721
By-product credits(136) 
 
 
Treatment charges320
 320
 
 320
Royalty on metals7
 6
 1
 7
Net cash costs1,872
 1,927
 121
 2,048
DD&A552
 523
 29
 552
Noncash and other costs, net40
 38
 2
 40
Total costs2,464
 2,488
 152
 2,640
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
11
 11
 
 11
Gross profit$624
 $600
 $24
 $624
        
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,332
 1,332
    
        
Gross profit per pound of copper:   
        
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.31
 $2.31
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash       
and other costs shown below1.26
 1.20
    
By-product credits(0.10) 
    
Treatment charges0.24
 0.24
    
Royalty on metals0.01
 
    
Unit net cash costs1.41
 1.44
    
DD&A0.41
 0.39
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.03
 0.03
    
Total unit costs1.85
 1.86
    
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing       
on prior period open sales0.01
 0.01
    
Gross profit per pound$0.47
 $0.46
    
        
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported       
(In millions)       
   Production    
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A  
Totals presented above$3,253
 $1,721
 $552
  
Treatment charges(320) 
 
  
Royalty on metals(7) 
 
  
Noncash and other costs, net
 40
 
  
Revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
11
 
 
  
Eliminations and other1
 (3) 1
  
South America mining2,938
 1,758
 553
  
Other miningb
13,547
 10,446
 1,021
  
Corporate, other & eliminations(1,655) (1,517) 956
  
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$14,830
 $10,687
 $2,530
  
a.Includes silver sales of 3.7 million ounces ($18.05 per ounce average realized price). Also reflects sales of molybdenum produced by Cerro Verde to our molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing.
b.Represents the combined total for all other mining operations as presented in Note 16.


Indonesia Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash (Credits) Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2018   
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper Gold 
Silvera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3,264
 $3,264
 $2,967
 $57
 $6,288
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1,678
 871
 792
 15
 1,678
Gold and silver credits(3,041) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges294
 153
 139
 2
 294
Export duties180
 93
 85
 2
 180
Royalty on metals238
 122
 114
 2
 238
Net cash (credits) costs(651) 1,239
 1,130
 21
 2,390
DD&A606
 314
 286
 6
 606
Noncash and other costs, net242
b 
126
 114
 2
 242
Total costs197
 1,679
 1,530
 29
 3,238
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
(34) (34) 17
 
 (17)
PT Smelting intercompany profit56
 29
 27
 
 56
Gross profit$3,089
 $1,580
 $1,481
 $28
 $3,089
          
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,130
 1,130
      
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)    2,366
    
          
Gross profit per pound of copper/per ounce of gold:     
          
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.89
 $2.89
 $1,254
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1.48
 0.77
 335
    
Gold and silver credits(2.69) 
 
    
Treatment charges0.26
 0.14
 59
    
Export duties0.16
 0.08
 36
    
Royalty on metals0.21
 0.11
 48
    
Unit net cash (credits) costs(0.58) 1.10
 478
    
DD&A0.54
 0.28
 121
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.21
b 
0.11
 48
    
Total unit costs0.17
 1.49
 647
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing         
on prior period open sales(0.03) (0.03) 7
    
PT Smelting intercompany profit0.04
 0.03
 12
    
Gross profit per pound/ounce$2.73
 $1.40
 $626
    
          
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported         
(In millions)         
   Production      
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above$6,288
 $1,678
 $606
    
Treatment charges(294) 
 
    
Export duties(180) 
 
    
Royalty on metals(238) 
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net
 242
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
(17) 
 
    
PT Smelting intercompany profit
 (56) 
    
Indonesia mining5,559
 1,864
 606
    
Other miningc
16,195
 13,117
 1,023
    
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,126) (3,290) 125
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$18,628
 $11,691
 $1,754
    
a.Includes silver sales of 3.8 million ounces ($15.24 per ounce average realized price).
b.Includes net charges of $223 million ($0.20 per pound of copper). Refer to “Consolidated Results-Summary Financial Data” for a summary of these charges.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.

Indonesia Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2021  
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopperGold
Silvera
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$5,715 $5,715 $2,423 $143 $8,281 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1,953 1,348 572 33 1,953 
Gold and silver credits(2,562)— — — — 
Treatment charges320 221 93 320 
Export duties218 150 64 218 
Royalty on metals319 223 90 319 
Net cash costs248 1,942 819 49 2,810 
DD&A1,049 724 307 18 1,049 
Noncash and other costs, net355 b245 104 355 
Total costs1,652 2,911 1,230 73 4,214 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
72 72 (4)— 68 
PT Smelting intercompany loss(86)(60)(25)(1)(86)
Gross profit$4,049 $2,816 $1,164 $69 $4,049 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,316 1,316 
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)1,349 
Gross profit per pound of copper/per ounce of gold:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$4.34 $4.34 $1,796 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1.49 1.03 424 
Gold and silver credits(1.95)— — 
Treatment charges0.24 0.17 69 
Export duties0.17 0.11 47 
Royalty on metals0.24 0.17 67 
Unit net cash costs0.19 1.48 607 
DD&A0.80 0.55 228 
Noncash and other costs, net0.27 b0.18 77 
Total unit costs1.26 2.21 912 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
0.05 0.05 (3)
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.07)(0.05)(19)
Gross profit per pound/ounce$3.06 $2.13 $862 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported    
   
  Production 
Revenuesand DeliveryDD&A 
Totals presented above$8,281 $1,953 $1,049  
Treatment charges(320)— —  
Export duties(218)— — 
Royalty on metals(319)— —  
Noncash and other costs, net31 386 —  
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
68 — —  
PT Smelting intercompany loss— 86 — 
Indonesia mining7,523 2,425 1,049  
Other miningc
21,531 15,431 882  
Corporate, other & eliminations(6,209)(5,840)67  
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$22,845 $12,016 $1,998  
a.Includes silver sales of 5.9 million ounces ($24.30 per ounce average realized price).
b.Includes charges totaling $340 million ($0.26 per pound of copper) associated with an ARO adjustment. Also, includes credits of $31 million ($0.02 per pound of copper) associated with adjustments to prior-year treatment charges and charges of $16 million ($0.01 per pound of copper) associated with a potential settlement of an administrative fine levied by the Indonesia government.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.
105

Year Ended December 31, 2017   
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper Gold 
Silvera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2,945
 $2,945
 $1,952
 $49
 $4,946
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1,544
 919
 609
 16
 1,544
Gold and silver credits(2,010) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges261
 156
 103
 2
 261
Export duties115
 68
 46
 1
 115
Royalty on metals173
 98
 73
 2
 173
Net cash costs83
 1,241
 831
 21
 2,093
DD&A556
 331
 220
 5
 556
Noncash and other costs, net163
b 
97
 64
 2
 163
Total costs802
 1,669
 1,115
 28
 2,812
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
39
 39
 9
 
 48
PT Smelting intercompany loss(28) (17) (11) 
 (28)
Gross profit$2,154
 $1,298
 $835
 $21
 $2,154
          
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)981
 981
      
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)    1,540
    
          
Gross profit per pound of copper/per ounce of gold:     
          
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3.00
 $3.00
 $1,268
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1.57
 0.94
 396
    
Gold and silver credits(2.05) 
 
    
Treatment charges0.27
 0.16
 67
    
Export duties0.12
 0.07
 30
    
Royalty on metals0.17
 0.10
 47
    
Unit net cash costs0.08
 1.27
 540
    
DD&A0.57
 0.34
 142
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.17
b 
0.10
 42
    
Total unit costs0.82
 1.71
 724
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing         
on prior period open sales0.04
 0.04
 6
    
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.02) (0.01) (7)    
Gross profit per pound/ounce$2.20
 $1.32
 $543
    
          
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported         
(In millions)         
   Production      
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above$4,946
 $1,544
 $556
    
Treatment charges(261) 
 
    
Export duties(115) 
 
    
Royalty on metals(173) 
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net
 163
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
48
 
 
    
PT Smelting intercompany loss
 28
 
    
Indonesia mining4,445
 1,735
 556
    
Other miningc
15,041
 11,649
 1,064
    
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,083) (3,118) 94
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$16,403
 $10,266
 $1,714
    
a.Includes silver sales of 3.0 million ounces ($16.56 per ounce average realized price).
b.Includes $120 million ($0.12 per pound of copper) of costs charged directly to production and delivery costs as a result of workforce reductions.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.

Indonesia Mining Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2020  
(In millions)By-ProductCo-Product Method
MethodCopper Gold
Silvera
Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2,475 $2,475 $1,545 $81 $4,101 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1,508 910 568 30 1,508 
Gold and silver credits(1,630)— — — — 
Treatment charges219 132 83 219 
Export duties93 56 35 93 
Royalty on metals153 90 60 153 
Net cash costs343 1,188 746 39 1,973 
DD&A580 350 219 11 580 
Noncash and other costs, net93 b56 35 93 
Total costs1,016 1,594 1,000 52 2,646 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(20)(20)— (16)
PT Smelting intercompany loss(11)(7)(4)— (11)
Gross profit$1,428 $854 $545 $29 $1,428 
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)804 804 
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)842 
Gross profit per pound of copper/per ounce of gold:
Revenues, excluding adjustments$3.08 $3.08 $1,832 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
1.88 1.13 674 
Gold and silver credits(2.03)— — 
Treatment charges0.27 0.17 98 
Export duties0.12 0.07 41 
Royalty on metals0.19 0.11 72 
Unit net cash costs0.43 1.48 885 
DD&A0.72 0.43 259 
Noncash and other costs, net0.11 b0.07 41 
Total unit costs1.26 1.98 1,185 
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(0.03)(0.03)
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.01)(0.01)(5)
Gross profit per pound/ounce$1.78 $1.06 $647 
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported     
    
  Production  
Revenuesand Delivery DD&A 
Totals presented above$4,101 $1,508 $580  
Treatment charges(219)— —  
Export duties(93)— — 
Royalty on metals(153)— —  
Noncash and other costs, net(6)87 —  
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
    on prior period open sales
(16)— —  
PT Smelting intercompany loss— 11 — 
Indonesia mining3,614 1,606  580  
Other miningc
14,392 12,089 878  
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,808)(3,664)70  
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$14,198 $10,031 $1,528  
a.Includes silver sales of 3.6 million ounces ($22.40 per ounce average realized price).
b.Includes COVID-19 related costs (including one-time incremental employee benefits and health and safety costs) of $14 million ($0.02 per pound of copper).
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.
106
Year Ended December 31, 2016   
(In millions)By-Product Co-Product Method
 Method Copper Gold 
Silvera
 Total
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2,448
 $2,448
 $1,304
 $50
 $3,802
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1,698
 1,094
 582
 22
 1,698
Gold and silver credits(1,371) 
 
 
 
Treatment charges297
 191
 102
 4
 297
Export duties96
 62
 33
 1
 96
Royalty on metals131
 79
 50
 2
 131
Net cash costs851
 1,426
 767
 29
 2,222
DD&A384
 247
 132
 5
 384
Noncash and other costs, net51
 33
 17
 1
 51
Total costs1,286
 1,706
 916
 35
 2,657
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales

 
 17
 
 17
PT Smelting intercompany loss(26) (17) (9) 
 (26)
Gross profit$1,136
 $725
 $396
 $15
 $1,136
          
Copper sales (millions of recoverable pounds)1,054
 1,054
      
Gold sales (thousands of recoverable ounces)    1,054
    
          
Gross profit per pound of copper/per ounce of gold:     
          
Revenues, excluding adjustments$2.32
 $2.32
 $1,237
    
Site production and delivery, before net noncash         
and other costs shown below1.61
 1.04
 553
    
Gold and silver credits(1.30) 
 
    
Treatment charges0.28
 0.18
 97
    
Export duties0.09
 0.06
 31
    
Royalty on metals0.13
 0.07
 47
    
Unit net cash costs0.81
 1.35
 728
    
DD&A0.36
 0.24
 125
    
Noncash and other costs, net0.05
 0.03
 17
    
Total unit costs1.22
 1.62
 870
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing         
on prior period open sales
 
 16
    
PT Smelting intercompany loss(0.02) (0.02) (8)    
Gross profit per pound/ounce$1.08
 $0.68
 $375
    
          
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported         
(In millions)         
   Production      
 Revenues and Delivery DD&A    
Totals presented above$3,802
 $1,698
 $384
    
Treatment charges(297) 
 
    
Export duties(96) 
 
    
Royalty on metals(131) 
 
    
Noncash and other costs, net
 51
 
    
Other revenue adjustments, primarily for pricing
on prior period open sales
17
 
 
    
PT Smelting intercompany loss
 26
 
    
Indonesia mining3,295
 1,775
 384
    
Other miningb
13,190
 10,429
 1,190
    
Corporate, other & eliminations(1,655) (1,517) 956
    
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$14,830
 $10,687
 $2,530
    
a.Includes silver sales of 2.9 million ounces ($17.09 per ounce average realized price).
b.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16.

Molybdenum Mines Product Revenues, Production Costs and Unit Net Cash Costs
 Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)20212020
Revenues, excluding adjustmentsa
$470 $243  
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
243 211  
Treatment charges and other26 21  
Net cash costs269 232  
DD&A67 57  
Metals inventory adjustments10 
Noncash and other costs, net10 19 b
Total costs347 318  
Gross profit (loss)$123 $(75) 
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
30 24 
Gross profit (loss) per pound of molybdenum:
Revenues, excluding adjustmentsa
$15.52 $9.94 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash
    and other costs shown below
8.02 8.65 
Treatment charges and other0.85 0.85 
Unit net cash costs8.87 9.50 
DD&A2.22 2.34 
Metals inventory adjustments0.03 0.42 
Noncash and other costs, net0.33 0.75 b
Total unit costs11.45 13.01 
Gross profit (loss) per pound$4.07 $(3.07)
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported
  Metals 
 Production Inventory 
Year Ended December 31, 2021Revenuesand Delivery DD&AAdjustments 
Totals presented above$470 $243 $67 $
Treatment charges and other(26)— — — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 10 — — 
Molybdenum mines444 253 67 
Other miningc
28,610 17,603 1,864 13 
Corporate, other & eliminations(6,209)(5,840)67 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$22,845 $12,016 $1,998 $16 
Year Ended December 31, 2020     
Totals presented above$243 $211 $57 $10 
Treatment charges and other(21)— — — 
Noncash and other costs, net— 19 — —  
Molybdenum mines222 230  57 10  
Other miningc
17,784 13,465 1,401 58 
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,808)(3,664)70 28 
As reported in our consolidated financial statements$14,198 $10,031 $1,528 $96 
a.Reflects sales of the Molybdenum mines’ production to the molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing. On a consolidated basis, realizations are based on the actual contract terms for sales to third parties; as a result, our consolidated average realized price per pound of molybdenum will differ from the amounts reported in this table.
b.Includes charges totaling $7 million ($0.29 per pound of molybdenum) primarily associated with contract cancellation costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic and employee separation costs associated with April 2020 revised operating plans.
c.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16. Also includes amounts associated with the molybdenum sales company, which includes sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.

107
   Years Ended December 31, 
(In millions)  2018 2017 2016 
Revenues, excluding adjustmentsa
  $440
 $295
 $208
 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash        
and other costs shown below  282
 220
 193
 
Treatment charges and other  30
 27
 22
 
Net cash costs  312
 247
 215
 
DD&A  79
 76
 68
 
Noncash and other costs, net  7
 7
 19
 
Total costs  398
 330
 302
 
Gross profit (loss)  $42
 $(35) $(94) 
         
Molybdenum sales (millions of recoverable pounds)a
  35
 32
 26
 
         
Gross profit (loss) per pound of molybdenum:   
         
Revenues, excluding adjustmentsa
  $12.36
 $9.22
 $8.02
 
Site production and delivery, before net noncash        
and other costs shown below  7.92
 6.86
 7.42
 
Treatment charges and other  0.85
 0.85
 0.86
 
Unit net cash costs  8.77
 7.71
 8.28
 
DD&A  2.21
 2.39
 2.62
 
Noncash and other costs, net  0.19
 0.23
 0.73
 
Total unit costs  11.17
 10.33
 11.63
 
Gross profit (loss) per pound  $1.19
 $(1.11) $(3.61) 
         
Reconciliation to Amounts Reported        
(In millions)        
   Production     
Year Ended December 31, 2018Revenues and Delivery DD&A   
Totals presented above$440
 $282
 $79
   
Treatment charges and other(30) 
 
   
Noncash and other costs, net
 7
 
   
Molybdenum mines410
 289
 79
   
Other miningb
21,344
 14,692
 1,550
   
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,126) (3,290) 125
   
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$18,628
 $11,691
 $1,754
   
         
Year Ended December 31, 2017        
Totals presented above$295
 $220
 $76
   
Treatment charges and other(27) 
 
   
Noncash and other costs, net
 7
 
   
Molybdenum mines268
 227
 76
   
Other miningb
19,218
 13,157
 1,544
   
Corporate, other & eliminations(3,083) (3,118) 94
   
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$16,403
 $10,266
 $1,714
   
         
Year Ended December 31, 2016        
Totals presented above$208
 $193
 $68
   
Treatment charges and other(22) 
 
   
Noncash and other costs, net
 19
 
   
Molybdenum mines186
 212
 68
   
Other miningb
16,299
 11,992
 1,506
   
Corporate, other & eliminations(1,655) (1,517) 956
   
As reported in FCX’s consolidated financial statements$14,830
 $10,687
 $2,530
   
         
a.Reflects sales of the Molybdenum mines’ production to the molybdenum sales company at market-based pricing. On a consolidated basis, realizations are based on the actual contract terms for sales to third parties; as a result, our consolidated average realized price per pound of molybdenum will differ from the amounts reported in this table.
b.Represents the combined total for our other mining operations as presented in Note 16. Also includes amounts associated with the molybdenum sales company, which includes sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT


Our discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements in which we discuss our potential future performance. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts, such as plans, projections, or expectations relating to business outlook, strategy, goals or targets; ore grades and milling rates,rates; production and sales volumes,volumes; unit net cash costs,costs; capital expenditures; operating costs; operating plans; cash flows, capital expenditures, our expectations regarding our share offlows; liquidity; PT-FI’s future cash flows through 2022, PT-FI’s development, financing, construction and completion of a new smelteradditional domestic smelting capacity in Indonesia PT-FI’s compliancein accordance with environmental standardsthe terms of its special mining license (IUPK); our commitments to deliver responsibly produced copper, including plans to implement and validate all of our operating sites under the new framework established byCopper Mark and to comply with other disclosure frameworks; execution of our energy and climate strategies and the MOEF,underlying assumptions and estimated impacts on our business related thereto; achievement of climate commitments and net zero aspirations; improvements in operating procedures and technology innovations; exploration efforts and results,results; development and production activities, rates and costs, liquidity,costs; future organic growth opportunities; tax rates,rates; export duties, thequotas and duties; impact of copper, gold and molybdenum price changes,changes; the impact of deferred intercompany profits on earnings,earnings; mineral reserve estimates,and mineral resource estimates; final resolution of settlements associated with ongoing legal proceedings; and the ongoing implementation of our financial policy and future returns to shareholders, including dividend payments (base or variable) and share purchases and sales.repurchases. The words “anticipates,” “may,” “can,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “targets,"targets,” “intends,” “likely,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “to be,” “potential””potential,” “assumptions,” “guidance,” “aspirations,” “future” and any similar expressions are intended to identify those assertions as forward-looking statements. The declaration and payment of dividends (base or variable) and timing and amount of any share repurchases is at the discretion of theour Board and will depend onmanagement, respectively, and is subject to a number of factors, including maintaining our net debt target, capital availability, our financial results, cash requirements, futurebusiness prospects, global economic conditions, changes in laws, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board or management, as applicable. Our share repurchase program may be modified, increased, suspended or terminated at any time at the Board.Board’s discretion.


We caution readers that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, expected, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that can cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, supply of and demand for, and prices of copper, goldthe commodities we produce, primarily copper; changes in our cash requirements, financial position, financing or investment plans; changes in general market, economic, tax, regulatory or industry conditions; reductions in liquidity and molybdenum;access to capital; the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any future public health crisis; political and social risks; operational risks inherent in mining, with higher inherent risks in underground mining; fluctuations in price and availability of commodities purchased; constraints on supply, logistics and transportation services; mine sequencing; changes in mine plans or operational modifications, delays, deferrals or cancellations; production rates; timing of shipments; results of technical, economic or feasibility studies; potential inventory adjustments; potential impairment of long-lived mining assets; the potential effects of violence in Indonesia generally and in the province of Papua; the IndonesianIndonesia government’s extension of PT-FI’s export license after February 16, 2019; risks associated with underground mining;March 15, 2022; satisfaction of requirements in accordance with PT-FI’s IUPK to extend mining rights from 2031 through 2041; industry risks; regulatory changes; political risks;the Indonesia government’s approval of a deferred schedule for completion of additional domestic smelting capacity in Indonesia; cybersecurity incidents; labor relations;relations, including labor-related work stoppages and costs; compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations; weather- and climate-related risks; environmental risks;risks and litigation results; cybersecurity incidents;our ability to comply with our responsible production commitments under specific frameworks and any changes to such frameworks and other factors described in more detail in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” contained in Part I of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Investors are cautioned that many of the assumptions upon which our forward-looking statements are based are likely to change after the date the forward-looking statements are made, including for example commodity prices, which we cannot control, and production volumes and costs or technological solutions and innovation, some aspects of which we may not be able to control. Further, we may make changes to our business plans that could affect our results. We caution investors that we do not intendundertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, more frequently than quarterlywhich speak only as of the date made, notwithstanding any changes in our assumptions, changes in business plans, actual experience or other changes,changes.

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 also includes forward-looking statements regarding mineral resources not included in proven and we undertakeprobable mineral reserves. A mineral resource, which includes measured, indicated and inferred mineral resources, is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Such a deposit cannot qualify as recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves until legal and economic feasibility are confirmed based upon a comprehensive evaluation of development and operating costs, grades, recoveries and other material factors. Accordingly, no obligationassurance can be given that the estimated mineral resources will become proven and probable mineral reserves.

Our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, also contains financial measures such as net debt and unit net cash costs per pound of copper and molybdenum, which are not recognized under U.S. GAAP. Refer to update any forward-looking“Operations - Unit Net Cash Costs” for further discussion of unit net cash costs associated with our operating divisions, and to “Product Revenues and Production Costs” for reconciliations of per pound costs by operating division to production and delivery costs applicable to sales reported in our consolidated financial statements. Refer to “Net Debt” for reconciliations of consolidated debt and consolidated cash and cash equivalents to net debt.

108


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING


Freeport-McMoRan Inc.’s (the Company’s) management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:


Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets;


Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and


Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2018,2021, our Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the COSO criteria.


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.


/s/ Richard C. Adkerson/s/ Kathleen L. Quirk
Richard C. AdkersonKathleen L. Quirk
Vice Chairman of the Board andExecutive Vice President and
President and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer

109

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OFTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited Freeport-McMoRan Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on the COSO criteria.
    
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017, and2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes of the Company and our report dated February 15, 20192022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Basis for Opinion


The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.


Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 15, 20192022

110

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OFTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.Freeport-McMoRan Inc.


Opinion on the Financial Statements
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017, and2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 15, 20192022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Uncertain tax positions
Description of the MatterAs discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company operates in the United States and multiple international tax jurisdictions, and its income tax returns are subject to examination by tax authorities in those jurisdictions who may challenge any tax position on these returns. Uncertainty in a tax position may arise because tax laws are subject to interpretation. The Company uses significant judgment to (1) determine whether, based on the technical merits, a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained and (2) measure the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition.
111

Auditing management’s estimate of the amount of tax benefit that qualifies for recognition involved auditor judgment because management’s estimate is complex, requires a high degree of judgment and is based on interpretations of tax laws and legal rulings.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s accounting process for uncertain tax positions. This included testing controls over management’s review of the technical merits of tax positions and disputed tax assessments, including the process to measure the financial statement impact of these tax matters.
Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company’s accounting for these tax positions by using our knowledge of and experience with the application of respective tax laws by the relevant tax authorities, or our understanding of the contractual arrangements with the applicable government, if the position is governed by a contract. We analyzed the Company’s assumptions and data used to determine the tax assessments and tested the accuracy of the calculations. We involved our tax professionals located in the respective jurisdictions to assess the technical merits of the Company’s tax positions and to evaluate the application of relevant tax laws in the Company’s recognition determination. We assessed the Company’s correspondence with the relevant tax authorities and evaluated third-party tax or legal opinions obtained by the Company. We also evaluated the adequacy of the Company’s disclosures included in Note 12 in relation to these tax matters.
Environmental obligations
Description of the MatterAs discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is subject to national, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, including restoration and reclamation of environmental contamination. Liabilities for environmental contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2021, the Company’s consolidated environmental obligations totaled $1.7 billion.
Auditing management’s accounting for environmental obligations was challenging, as significant judgment is required by the Company to evaluate whether an environmental loss has been incurred and to estimate the future costs to remediate the environmental matters. The significant judgment was primarily due to the inherent estimation uncertainty relating to the amount of future costs. Such uncertainties involve assumptions regarding the nature and extent of contamination at each site, the nature and extent of required cleanup efforts under existing environmental regulations, the duration and effectiveness of the chosen remedial strategy, and allocation of costs among other potentially responsible parties. Actual costs incurred in future periods could differ from amounts estimated.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s identification and measurement of the environmental loss contingencies. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the environmental loss contingency calculations and management’s assessment to evaluate key judgments and estimates affecting the environmental loss contingencies.
To test the Company’s identification and measurement of the environmental loss contingencies, among other procedures, we inspected correspondence with regulatory agencies, obtained external legal counsel confirmation letters, and inspected environmental studies. Additionally, we assessed the appropriateness of the Company’s models and tested the significant assumptions discussed above along with the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses. We utilized our environmental professionals to search for new or contrary evidence related to the Company’s sites and to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of estimated future costs by comparing the estimated future costs to environmental permits, third party observable data such as vendor quotes, and to historical costs incurred for similar activities.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.


Phoenix, Arizona
February 15, 20192022

112


FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
 (In millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues$22,845 $14,198 $14,402 
Cost of sales:   
Production and delivery12,016 10,031 11,534 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization1,998 1,528 1,412 
Metals inventory adjustments16 96 179 
Total cost of sales14,030 11,655 13,125 
Selling, general and administrative expenses383 370 394 
Mining exploration and research expenses55 50 104 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs91 159 105 
Net gain on sales of assets(80)(473)(417)
Total costs and expenses14,479 11,761 13,311 
Operating income8,366 2,437 1,091 
Interest expense, net(602)(598)(620)
Net loss on early extinguishment of debt— (101)(27)
Other (expense) income, net(105)59 (138)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings7,659 1,797 306 
Provision for income taxes(2,299)(944)(510)
Equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings12 12 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations5,365 865 (192)
Net gain from discontinued operations— — 
Net income (loss)5,365 865 (189)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(1,059)(266)(50)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$4,306 $599 $(239)
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:   
Continuing operations$2.93 $0.41 $(0.17)
Discontinued operations— — — 
$2.93 $0.41 $(0.17)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:   
Continuing operations$2.90 $0.41 $(0.17)
Discontinued operations— — — 
$2.90 $0.41 $(0.17)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:   
Basic1,466 1,453 1,451 
Diluted1,482 1,461 1,451 
Dividends declared per share of common stock$0.375 $— $0.20 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (In millions, except per share amounts)
Revenues$18,628
 $16,403
 $14,830
Cost of sales:     
Production and delivery11,691
 10,266
 10,687
Depreciation, depletion and amortization1,754
 1,714
 2,530
Impairment of oil and gas properties
 
 4,317
Total cost of sales13,445
 11,980
 17,534
Selling, general and administrative expenses443
 477
 597
Mining exploration and research expenses105
 93
 63
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs89
 244
 14
Net gain on sales of assets(208) (81) (649)
Total costs and expenses13,874
 12,713
 17,559
Operating income (loss)4,754
 3,690
 (2,729)
Interest expense, net(945) (801) (755)
Net gain on early extinguishment and exchanges of debt7
 21
 26
Other income (expense), net76
 (8) (14)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings3,892
 2,902
 (3,472)
Provision for income taxes(991) (883) (371)
Equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings8
 10
 11
Net income (loss) from continuing operations2,909
 2,029
 (3,832)
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(15) 66
 (193)
Net income (loss)2,894
 2,095
 (4,025)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests:     
Continuing operations(292) (274) (227)
Discontinued operations
 (4) (63)
Gain on redemption and preferred dividends attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
 161
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$2,602
 $1,817
 $(4,154)
      
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:     
Continuing operations$1.80
 $1.21
 $(2.96)
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20)
 $1.79
 $1.25
 $(3.16)
      
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:     
Continuing operations$1.79
 $1.21
 $(2.96)
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20)
 $1.78
 $1.25
 $(3.16)
      
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:     
Basic1,449
 1,447
 1,318
Diluted1,458
 1,454
 1,318
      
Dividends declared per share of common stock$0.20
 $
 $


The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



113
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31,
202120202019
(In millions)
Net income (loss)$5,365 $865 $(189)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Defined benefit plans:
Actuarial gains (losses) arising during the period, net of taxes179 46 (116)
Amortization or curtailment of unrecognized amounts included in net periodic benefit costs18 45 47 
Foreign exchange (losses) gains(1)(1)
Other comprehensive income (loss)196 90 (68)
Total comprehensive income (loss)5,561 955 (257)
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(1,060)(263)(53)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$4,501 $692 $(310)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
 (In millions)
      
Net income (loss)$2,894
 $2,095
 $(4,025)
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:     
Unrealized gains on securities
 1
 2
Defined benefit plans:     
Actuarial (losses) gains arising during the period, net of taxes(77) 14
 (88)
Prior service costs arising during the period(4) 
 
Amortization or curtailment of unrecognized amounts included in net periodic benefit costs48
 54
 44
Foreign exchange losses(1) 
 (1)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(34) 69
 (43)
      
Total comprehensive income (loss)2,860
 2,164
 (4,068)
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(291) (286) (292)
Gain on redemption and preferred dividends attributable to     
redeemable noncontrolling interest


 
 161
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$2,569
 $1,878
 $(4,199)


The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.





114
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 202120202019
 (In millions) (In millions)
Cash flow from operating activities:      Cash flow from operating activities:   
Net income (loss) $2,894
 $2,095
 $(4,025)Net income (loss)$5,365 $865 $(189)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:      Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,754
 1,714
 2,610
Depreciation, depletion and amortization1,998 1,528 1,412 
U.S. tax reform benefit (123) (393) 
Net charges for Cerro Verde royalty dispute 371
 355
 
Payments for Cerro Verde royalty dispute (56) (53) (30)
Impairment of oil and gas properties 
 
 4,317
Oil and gas noncash drillship settlement costs and other adjustments 
 (33) 803
Metals inventory adjustmentsMetals inventory adjustments16 96 179 
Net gain on sales of assets (208) (81) (649)Net gain on sales of assets(80)(473)(417)
Stock-based compensation 76
 71
 86
Stock-based compensation98 99 63 
Net charges for environmental and asset retirement obligations, including accretion 262
 383
 191
Net charges for environmental and asset retirement obligations, including accretion540 181 221 
Payments for environmental and asset retirement obligations (239) (131) (242)Payments for environmental and asset retirement obligations(273)(216)(244)
Charge for talc-related litigationCharge for talc-related litigation— 130 — 
Net charges for defined pension and postretirement plans 81
 120
 113
Net charges for defined pension and postretirement plans65 108 
Pension plan contributions (75) (174) (57)Pension plan contributions(109)(121)(75)
Net gain on early extinguishment and exchanges of debt (7) (21) (26)
Net loss on early extinguishment of debtNet loss on early extinguishment of debt— 101 27 
Deferred income taxes (404) 76
 239
Deferred income taxes(171)181 29 
Loss (gain) on disposal of discontinued operations 15
 (57) 198
Decrease in long-term mill and leach stockpiles 94
 224
 10
Charges for Cerro Verde royalty disputeCharges for Cerro Verde royalty dispute11 32 65 
Payments for Cerro Verde royalty disputePayments for Cerro Verde royalty dispute(421)(139)(187)
Other, net 16
 (2) 112
Other, net(18)23 141 
Changes in working capital and other tax payments, excluding disposition amounts:      
Changes in working capital and other:Changes in working capital and other:   
Accounts receivable 649
 427
 (175)Accounts receivable(472)132 119 
Inventories (631) (393) 117
Inventories(618)42 259 
Other current assets (28) (28) 37
Other current assets(101)(27)60 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (106) 110
 (28)Accounts payable and accrued liabilities495 115 (60)
Accrued income taxes and timing of other tax payments (472) 457
 136
Accrued income taxes and timing of other tax payments1,451 403 (29)
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,863
 4,666
 3,737
Net cash provided by operating activities7,715 3,017 1,482 
Cash flow from investing activities:      Cash flow from investing activities:   
Capital expenditures:      Capital expenditures:   
North America copper mines (601) (167) (102)North America copper mines(342)(428)(877)
South America (237) (115) (382)South America(162)(183)(256)
Indonesia (1,001) (875) (1,025)
Indonesia miningIndonesia mining(1,296)(1,161)(1,369)
Indonesia smelter developmentIndonesia smelter development(222)(105)— 
Molybdenum mines (9) (5) (2)Molybdenum mines(6)(19)(19)
Other, including oil and gas operations (123) (248) (1,302)
Acquisition of PT Rio Tinto Indonesia (3,500) 
 
Proceeds from sales of:      
Tenke Fungurume mine 
 
 2,664
Deepwater Gulf of Mexico and onshore California oil and gas properties 
 
 2,272
Additional interest in Morenci joint venture 
 
 996
PT Indonesia Papua Metal dan Mineral

 457
 
 
Other assets 93
 72
 423
OtherOther(87)(65)(131)
Proceeds from sales of assetsProceeds from sales of assets247 704 561 
Loans to PT Smelting for expansionLoans to PT Smelting for expansion(36)— — 
Acquisition of minority interest in PT SmeltingAcquisition of minority interest in PT Smelting(33)— — 
Other, net (97) 17
 11
Other, net(27)(7)(12)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (5,018) (1,321) 3,553
Net cash used in investing activitiesNet cash used in investing activities(1,964)(1,264)(2,103)
Cash flow from financing activities:      Cash flow from financing activities:   
Proceeds from debt 632
 955
 3,681
Proceeds from debt1,201 3,531 1,879 
Repayments of debt (2,717) (3,812) (7,625)Repayments of debt(1,461)(3,724)(3,197)
Proceeds from sale of PT Freeport Indonesia shares 3,500
 
 
Net proceeds from sale of common stock 
 
 1,515
Cash dividends and distributions paid:      Cash dividends and distributions paid:   
Common stock (218) (2) (6)Common stock(331)(73)(291)
Noncontrolling interests, including redemption (278) (174) (693)
Other, net (19) (22) (38)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 900
 (3,055) (3,166)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents (255) 290
 4,124
Increase in cash and cash equivalents in assets held for sale 
 
 (45)
Noncontrolling interestsNoncontrolling interests(583)— (82)
Treasury stock purchasesTreasury stock purchases(488)— — 
Contributions from noncontrolling interestsContributions from noncontrolling interests182 156 165 
Proceeds from exercised stock optionsProceeds from exercised stock options210 51 
Payments for withholding of employee taxes related to stock-based awardsPayments for withholding of employee taxes related to stock-based awards(29)(17)(8)
Debt financing costs and other, netDebt financing costs and other, net(41)(52)(24)
Net cash used in financing activitiesNet cash used in financing activities(1,340)(128)(1,556)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalentsNet increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents4,411 1,625 (2,177)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year 4,710
 4,420
 341
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year3,903 2,278 4,455 
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year $4,455
 $4,710
 $4,420
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year$8,314 $3,903 $2,278 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

115
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
2018 2017 20212020
(In millions, except par value) (In millions, except par value)
ASSETS   ASSETS  
Current assets:   Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$4,217
 $4,526
Cash and cash equivalents$8,068 $3,657 
Trade accounts receivable829
 1,322
Trade accounts receivable1,168 892 
Income and other tax receivables493
 343
Income and other tax receivables574 520 
Inventories:   Inventories:  
Materials and supplies, net1,528
 1,323
Materials and supplies, net1,669 1,594 
Mill and leach stockpiles1,453
 1,422
Mill and leach stockpiles1,170 1,014 
Product1,778
 1,404
Product1,658 1,285 
Other current assets422
 286
Other current assets523 341 
Total current assets10,720
 10,626
Total current assets14,830 9,303 
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net28,010
 22,994
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net30,345 29,818 
Long-term mill and leach stockpiles1,314
 1,409
Long-term mill and leach stockpiles1,387 1,463 
Other assets2,172
 2,273
Other assets1,460 1,560 
Total assets$42,216
 $37,302
Total assets$48,022 $42,144 
   
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current liabilities:   Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$2,625
 $2,497
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$3,495 $2,708 
Accrued income taxes165
 583
Accrued income taxes1,541 324 
Current portion of debtCurrent portion of debt372 34 
Current portion of environmental and asset retirement obligations449
 420
Current portion of environmental and asset retirement obligations264 351 
Dividends payable73
 
Dividends payable220 — 
Current portion of debt17
 1,414
Total current liabilities3,329
 4,914
Total current liabilities5,892 3,417 
Long-term debt, less current portion11,124
 11,815
Long-term debt, less current portion9,078 9,677 
Deferred income taxes4,032
 3,663
Deferred income taxes4,234 4,408 
Environmental and asset retirement obligations, less current portion3,609
 3,602
Environmental and asset retirement obligations, less current portion4,116 3,705 
Other liabilities2,230
 2,012
Other liabilities1,683 2,269 
Total liabilities24,324
 26,006
Total liabilities25,003 23,476 
   
Equity:   Equity:  
Stockholders’ equity:   Stockholders’ equity:  
Common stock, par value $0.10, 1,579 shares and 1,578 shares issued, respectively158
 158
Common stock, par value $0.10, 1,603 shares and 1,590 shares issued, respectivelyCommon stock, par value $0.10, 1,603 shares and 1,590 shares issued, respectively160 159 
Capital in excess of par value26,013
 26,751
Capital in excess of par value25,875 26,037 
Accumulated deficit(12,041) (14,722)Accumulated deficit(7,375)(11,681)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(605) (487)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(388)(583)
Common stock held in treasury – 130 shares, at cost(3,727) (3,723)
Common stock held in treasury - 146 shares and 132 shares, respectively, at costCommon stock held in treasury - 146 shares and 132 shares, respectively, at cost(4,292)(3,758)
Total stockholders’ equity9,798
 7,977
Total stockholders’ equity13,980 10,174 
Noncontrolling interests (refer to Note 2)8,094
 3,319
Noncontrolling interestsNoncontrolling interests9,039 8,494 
Total equity17,892
 11,296
Total equity23,019 18,668 
Total liabilities and equity$42,216
 $37,302
Total liabilities and equity$48,022 $42,144 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

116
FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
 Stockholders’ Equity    
 Common Stock    Accumulated Deficit 
Accumu-
lated
Other Compre-hensive
Loss
 
Common Stock
Held in Treasury
 
Total
Stock-
holders’
Equity
    
 
Number
of
Shares
 
At Par
Value
 
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
   
Number
of
Shares
 
At
Cost
  
Non-
controlling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
 (In millions)
Balance at January 1, 20161,374
 $137
 $24,283
 $(12,387) $(503) 128
 $(3,702) $7,828
 $4,216
 $12,044
Issuance of common stock197
 20
 2,346
 
 
 
 
 2,366
 
 2,366
Exercised and issued stock-based awards3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation, including tax reserve and the tender of shares
 
 61
 
 
 1
 (6) 55
 
 55
Dividends, including forfeited dividends
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
 (90) (89)
Changes in noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (6) (6)
Sale of interest in TF Holdings Limited
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,206) (1,206)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
 
 
 (4,154) 
 
 
 (4,154) 
 (4,154)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 290
 290
Other comprehensive (loss) income
 
 
 
 (45) 
 
 (45) 2
 (43)
Balance at December 31, 20161,574
 157
 26,690
 (16,540) (548) 129
 (3,708) 6,051
 3,206
 9,257
Exercised and issued stock-based awards4
 1
 5
 
 
 
 
 6
 
 6
Stock-based compensation, including the tender of shares
 
 56
 
 
 1
 (15) 41
 1
 42
Dividends, including forfeited dividends
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
 (174) (173)
Net income attributable to common stockholders
 
 
 1,817
 
 
 
 1,817
 
 1,817
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 278
 278
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 61
 
 
 61
 8
 69
Balance at December 31, 20171,578
 158
 26,751
 (14,722) (487) 130
 (3,723) 7,977
 3,319
 11,296
Exercised and issued stock-based awards1
 
 8
 
 
 
 
 8
 
 8
Stock-based compensation, including the tender of shares
 
 70
 
 
 
 (4) 66
 
 66
Dividends
 
 (291) 
 
 
 
 (291) (278) (569)
Adoption of new accounting standard for reclassification of income taxes
 
 
 79
 (79) 
 
 
 
 
Sale of interest in PT Freeport Indonesia (refer to Note 2)
 
 (525) 
 (6) 
 
 (531) 4,762
 4,231
Net income attributable to common stockholders
 
 
 2,602
 
 
 
 2,602
 
 2,602
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 292
 292
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (33) 
 
 (33) (1) (34)
Balance at December 31, 20181,579
 $158
 $26,013
 $(12,041) $(605) 130
 $(3,727) $9,798
 $8,094
 $17,892
 Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock Accumulated DeficitAccumu-
lated
Other Compre-hensive
Loss
Common Stock
Held in Treasury
Total
Stock-
holders’
Equity
Number
of
Shares
At Par
Value
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Number
of
Shares
At
Cost
Non-
controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
 (In millions)
Balance at January 1, 20191,579 $158 $26,013 $(12,041)$(605)130 $(3,727)$9,798 $8,094 $17,892 
Exercised and issued stock-based awards— — — — — — 
Stock-based compensation, including the tender of shares— — 50 — — (7)43 44 
Dividends— — (291)— — — — (291)(73)(364)
Changes in noncontrolling interests— — (1)— — — — (1)(11)(12)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — 80 — — — — 80 86 166 
Adjustment for deferred taxes— — (22)— — — — (22)— (22)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders— — — (239)— — — (239)— (239)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — 50 50 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — (71)— — (71)(68)
Balance at December 31, 20191,582 158 25,830 (12,280)(676)131 (3,734)9,298 8,150 17,448 
Exercised and issued stock-based awards57 — — — — 58 — 58 
Stock-based compensation, including the tender of shares— — 74 — — (24)50 — 50 
Changes in noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — 76 — — — — 76 80 156 
Net income attributable to common stockholders— — — 599 — — — 599 — 599 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — 266 266 
Other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — 93 — — 93 (3)90 
Balance at December 31, 20201,590 159 26,037 (11,681)(583)132 (3,758)10,174 8,494 18,668 
Exercised and issued stock-based awards13 225 — — — — 226 — 226 
Stock-based compensation, including the tender of shares— — 75 — — (46)29 (5)24 
Treasury stock purchases— — — — — 13 (488)(488)— (488)
Dividends— — (551)— — — — (551)(603)(1,154)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— — 89 — — — — 89 93 182 
Net income attributable to common stockholders— — — 4,306 — — — 4,306 — 4,306 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — — — 1,059 1,059 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 195 — — 195 196 
Balance at December 31, 20211,603 $160 $25,875 $(7,375)$(388)146 $(4,292)$13,980 $9,039 $23,019 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



117


FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NOTE 1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation.  The consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) include the accounts of those subsidiaries where it directly or indirectly has more than 50 percent of the voting rights and/or has control over the subsidiary. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the most significant entities that FCX consolidates include its 48.76 percent-owned subsidiary PT Freeport Indonesia (PT-FI), and the following wholly owned subsidiaries: Freeport Minerals Corporation (FMC) and Atlantic Copper, S.L.U. (Atlantic Copper). Refer to Notes 2 andNote 3 for further discussion, including FCX’s conclusion to consolidate PT-FI.


During 2016, FCX completed sales of its Africa mining operation held by FMC and substantially all of its oil and gas operations. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.

FCX’sFMC’s unincorporated joint ventures areventure at Morenci is reflected using the proportionate consolidation method (refer to Note 3 for further discussion). Investments in unconsolidated companies owned 20 percent or more are recorded using the equity method. Investments in unconsolidated companies owned less than 20 percent, and for which FCX does not exercise significant influence, are recorded using theat (i) fair value for those that have a readily determinable fair value or (ii) cost, method.less any impairment, for those that do not have a readily determinable fair value. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Dollar amounts in tables are stated in millions, except per share amounts.


Business Segments.  FCX has organized its mining operations into four4 primary divisions - North America copper mines, South America mining, Indonesia mining and Molybdenum mines, and operating segments that meet certain thresholds are reportable segments. FCX’s reportable segments include the Morenci, Cerro Verde and Grasberg (Indonesia mining) copper mines, the Rod & Refining operations and Atlantic Copper Smelting & Refining. Refer to Note 16 for further discussion.


Use of Estimates.  The preparation of FCX’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and accompanying notes. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include minerals reserve estimation; asset lives for depreciation, depletion and amortization; environmental obligations; asset retirement obligations; estimates of recoverable copper in mill and leach stockpiles; deferred taxes and valuation allowances; reserves for contingencies and litigation; asset acquisitions and impairment, including estimates used to derive future cash flows associated with those assets; pension benefits; and valuation of derivative instruments. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Functional Currency. The functional currency for the majority of FCX’s foreign operations is the U.S. dollar. For foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in the local currency are translated at current exchange rates, and non-monetary assets and liabilities, such as inventories, property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, are translated at historical rates. Gains and losses resulting from translation of such account balances are included in other (expense) income, net, as are gains and losses from foreign currency transactions. Foreign currency gains (losses) totaled $14$66 million in 2018, $(5)2021, $34 million in 20172020 and $32$24 million in 2016.2019.


Cash Equivalents.  Highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.


Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents. FCX’s restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are primarily related to PT-FI’s commitment for the development of a newgreenfield smelter in Indonesia; and guarantees and commitments for certain mine closure and reclamation obligations, and customs duty taxes; and funds held as cash collateral for surety bonds related to plugging and abandonment obligations of certain oil and gas properties.obligations. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are classified as a current or long-term asset based on the timing and nature of when or how the cash is expected to be used or when the restrictions are expected to lapse. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are comprised of timebank deposits and money market funds.



118

Inventories.  Inventories include materials and supplies, mill and leach stockpiles, and product inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value (NRV).



Mill and Leach Stockpiles. Mill and leach stockpiles are work-in-process inventories for FCX’s mining operations. Mill and leach stockpiles contain ore that has been extracted from an ore body and is available for metal recovery. Mill stockpiles contain sulfide ores, and recovery of metal is through milling, concentrating and smelting and refining or, alternatively, by concentrate leaching. Leach stockpiles contain oxide ores and certain secondary sulfide ores and recovery of metal is through exposure to acidic solutions that dissolve contained copper and deliver it in solution to extraction processing facilities (i.e., solution extraction and electrowinning (SX/EW)). The recorded cost of mill and leach stockpiles includes mining and haulage costs incurred to deliver ore to stockpiles, depreciation, depletion, amortization and site overhead costs. Material is removed from the stockpiles at a weighted-average cost per pound.


Because it is impracticable to determine copper contained in mill and leach stockpiles by physical count, reasonable estimation methods are employed. The quantity of material delivered to mill and leach stockpiles is based on surveyed volumes of mined material and daily production records. Sampling and assaying of blasthole cuttings determine the estimated copper grade of the material delivered to mill and leach stockpiles.


Expected copper recovery ratesrecoveries for mill stockpiles are determined by metallurgical testing. The recoverable copper in mill stockpiles, once entered into the production process, can be produced into copper concentrate almost immediately.


Expected copper recovery ratesrecoveries for leach stockpiles are determined using small-scale laboratory tests, small- to large-scale column testing (which simulates the production process), historical trends and other factors, including mineralogy of the ore and rock type. Total copper recovery in leach stockpiles can vary significantly from a low percentage to more than 90 percent depending on several variables, including processing methodology, processing variables, mineralogy and particle size of the rock. For newly placed material on active stockpiles, as much as 80 percent of the total copper recovery may occur during the first year, and the remaining copper may be recovered over many years.


ProcessesProcess rates and recovery ratescopper recoveries for mill and leach stockpiles are monitored regularly, and recovery rate estimates are adjusted periodically as additional information becomes available and as related technology changes. Adjustments to recovery ratesRecovery adjustments will typically result in a future impact to the value of the material removed from the stockpiles at a revised weighted-average cost per pound of recoverable copper.


Product. Product inventories include raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. Corporate general and administrative costs are not included in inventory costs.

Raw materials are primarily unprocessed concentrate at Atlantic Copper’s smelting and refining operations.

Work-in-process inventories are primarily copper concentrate at various stages of conversion into anode and cathode at Atlantic Copper’s operations. Atlantic Copper’s in-process inventories are valued at the weighted-average cost of the material fed to the smelting and refining process plus in-process conversion costs.

Finished goods for mining operations represent salable products (e.g., copper and molybdenum concentrate, copper anode, copper cathode, copper rod, copper wire, molybdenum oxide, and high-purity molybdenum chemicals and other metallurgical products). Finished goods are valued based on the weighted-average cost of source material plus applicable conversion costs relating to associated process facilities. Costs of finished goods and work-in-process (i.e., not raw materials) inventories include labor and benefits, supplies, energy, depreciation, depletion, amortization, site overhead costs and other necessary costs associated with the extraction and processing of ore, including, depending on the process,such as mining, haulage, milling, concentrating, smelting, leaching, solution extraction,SX/EW, refining, roasting and chemical processing. Corporate general and administrative costs are not included in inventory costs.



119

Property, Plant, Equipment and Mine Development Costs.  Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs are carried at cost. Mineral exploration costs, as well as drilling and other costs incurred for the purpose of converting mineral resources to proven and probable mineral reserves or identifying new mineral resources at development or production stage properties, are charged to expense as incurred. Development costs are capitalized beginning after proven and probable mineral reserves have been established. Development costs include costs incurred resulting from mine pre-production activities undertaken to gain access to proven and probable mineral reserves, including shafts, adits, drifts, ramps, permanent excavations, infrastructure and removal of overburden. For underground mines certain costs related to panel development, such as undercutting and drawpoint development, are also capitalized as mine development costs until production reaches sustained design capacity for the mine. After reaching design capacity, the mine transitions to the production phase and panel development costs are allocated to inventory and then included as a component of cost of goods sold. Additionally, interest expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to constructing new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready for their intended use.



Expenditures for replacements and improvements are capitalized. Costs related to periodic scheduled maintenance (i.e., turnarounds) are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation for mining and milling life-of-mine assets, infrastructure and other common costs is determined using the unit-of-production (UOP) method based on total estimated recoverable proven and probable copper reserves (for primary copper mines) and proven and probable molybdenum reserves (for primary molybdenum mines). Development costs and acquisition costs for proven and probable mineral reserves that relate to a specific ore body are depreciated using the UOP method based on estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves for the ore body benefited. Depreciation, depletion and amortization using the UOP method is recorded upon extraction of the recoverable copper or molybdenum from the ore body or production of finished goods (as applicable), at which time it is allocated to inventory cost and then included as a component of cost of goods sold. Other assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives for the related assets of up to 4050 years for buildings and three3 to 3050 years for machinery and equipment, and mobile equipment.


Included in property, plant, equipment and mine development costs is value beyond proven and probable mineral reserves (VBPP), primarily resulting from FCX’s acquisition of FMC in 2007. The concept of VBPP may be interpreted differently by different mining companies. FCX’s VBPP is attributable to (i) mineralized material, which includes measured and indicated amounts,mineral resources, that FCX believes could be brought into production with the establishment or modification of required permits and should market conditions and technical assessments warrant, (ii) inferred mineral resources and (iii) exploration potential.


Carrying amounts assigned to VBPP are not charged to expense until the VBPP becomes associated with additional proven and probable mineral reserves and the reserves are produced or the VBPP is determined to be impaired. Additions to proven and probable mineral reserves for properties with VBPP will carry with them the value assigned to VBPP at the date acquired, less any impairment amounts. Refer to Note 5 for further discussion.


Impairment of Long-Lived Mining Assets.  FCX assesses the carrying values of its long-lived mining assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable. In evaluating long-lived mining assets for recoverability, estimates of pre-tax undiscounted future cash flows of FCX’s individual mines are used. An impairment is considered to exist if total estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Once it is determined that an impairment exists, an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds its fair value. The estimated undiscounted cash flows used to assess recoverability of long-lived assets and to measure the fair value of FCX’s mining operations are derived from current business plans, which are developed using near-term price forecasts reflective of the current price environment and management’s projections for long-term average metal prices. In addition to near- and long-term metal price assumptions, other key assumptions include estimates of commodity-based and other input costs; proven and probable mineral reserves estimates, including the timing and cost to develop and produce the reserves; VBPP estimates; and the use of appropriate discount rates in the measurement of fair value. FCX believes its estimates and models used to determine fair value are similar to what a market participant would use. As quoted market prices are unavailable for FCX’s individual mining operations, fair value is determined through the use of after-tax discounted estimated future cash flows (i.e., Level 3 measurement).


Oil and Gas Properties. FCX follows the full cost method
120



The costs of unproved oil and gas properties were excluded from amortization until the properties were evaluated. Costs were transferred into the amortization base on an ongoing basis as the properties were evaluated and proved oil and natural gas reserves were established or if impairment was determined. Unproved oil and gas properties were assessed periodically, at least annually, to determine whether impairment had occurred. FCX assessed unproved oil and gas properties for impairment on an individual basis or as a group if properties were individually insignificant. The assessment considered the following factors, among others: intent to drill, remaining lease term, geological and geophysical evaluations, drilling results and activity, the assignment of proved reserves, the economic viability of development if proved reserves were assigned and other current market conditions. During any period in which these factors indicated an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs were transferred to the full cost pool and were then subject to amortization. Including amounts determined to be impaired, FCX transferred $4.9 billion of costs associated with unevaluated properties to the full cost pool in 2016. The transfer of costs into the amortization base involved a significant amount of judgment. Costs not subject to amortization consisted primarily of capitalized costs incurred for undeveloped acreage and wells in progress pending determination, together with capitalized interest for these projects. Following the completion of the sales of oil and gas properties discussed in Note 2, FCX had no unproved oil and gas properties in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2018 or 2017. Interest costs totaling $7 million in 2016 were capitalized on oil and gas properties not subject to amortization and in the process of development.

Proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties are accounted for as reductions to capitalized costs unless the reduction causes a significant change in proved reserves, which, absent other factors, is generally described as a 25 percent or greater change, and significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves attributable to a cost center, in which case a gain or loss is recognized.

Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties. Under the SEC full cost accounting rules, FCX reviewed the carrying value of its oil and gas properties in the full cost pool for impairment each quarter on a country-by-country basis. Under these rules, capitalized costs of oil and gas properties (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment, and related deferred income taxes) for each cost center may not exceed a “ceiling” equal to:

the present value, discounted at 10 percent, of estimated future net cash flows from the related proved oil and natural gas reserves, net of estimated future income taxes; plus
the cost of the related unproved properties not being amortized; plus
the lower of cost or estimated fair value of the related unproved properties included in the costs being amortized (net of related tax effects).

These rules require that FCX price its future oil and gas production at the twelve-month average of the first-day-of-the-month historical reference prices as adjusted for location and quality differentials. FCX’s reference prices are West Texas Intermediate (WTI) for oil and the Henry Hub price for natural gas. Such prices are utilized except where different prices are fixed and determinable from applicable contracts for the remaining term of those contracts. The reserve estimates exclude the effect of any crude oil and natural gas derivatives FCX has in place. The estimated future net cash flows also exclude future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations included in the net book value of the oil and gas properties. The rules require an impairment if the capitalized costs exceed this “ceiling.”

In 2016, net capitalized costs with respect to FCX’s proved oil and gas properties exceeded the related ceiling test limitation; therefore, impairment charges of $4.3 billion were recorded primarily because of the lower twelve-month average of the first-day-of-the-month historical reference oil price and reserve revisions.

Deferred Mining Costs.  Stripping costs (i.e., the costs of removing overburden and waste material to access mineral deposits) incurred during the production phase of aan open-pit mine are considered variable production costs and are included as a component of inventory produced during the period in which stripping costs are incurred. Major development expenditures, including stripping costs to prepare unique and identifiable areas outside the current mining area for future production that are considered to be pre-production mine development, are capitalized and amortized using the UOP method based on estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves for the ore body benefited. However, where a second or subsequent pit or major expansion is considered to be a continuation of existing mining activities, stripping costs are accounted for as a current production cost and a component of the associated inventory.



Environmental Obligations. Environmental expenditures are charged to expense or capitalized, depending upon their future economic benefits. Accruals for such expenditures are recorded when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Environmental obligations attributed to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) or analogous state programs are considered probable when a claim is asserted, or is probable of assertion, and FCX, or any of its subsidiaries, have been associated with the site. Other environmental remediation obligations are considered probable based on specific facts and circumstances. FCX’s estimates of these costs are based on an evaluation of various factors, including currently available facts, existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, remediation experience, whether or not FCX is a potentially responsible party (PRP) and the ability of other PRPs to pay their allocated portions. With the exception of those obligations assumed in the acquisition of FMC that were initially recorded at estimated fair values (refer to Note 12 for further discussion), environmental obligations are recorded on an undiscounted basis. Where the available information is sufficient to estimate the amount of the obligation, that estimate has been used. Where the information is only sufficient to establish a range of probable liability and no point within the range is more likely than any other, the lower end of the range has been used. Possible recoveries of some of these costs from other parties are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements until they become probable. Legal costs associated with environmental remediation (such as fees to outside lawthird-party legal firms for work relating to determining the extent and type of remedial actions and the allocation of costs among PRPs) are included as part of the estimated obligation.


Environmental obligations assumed in the acquisition of FMC, which were initially recorded at fair value and estimated on a discounted basis, are accreted to full value over time through charges to interest expense. Adjustments arising from changes in amounts and timing of estimated costs and settlements may result in increases and decreases in these obligations and are calculated in the same manner as they were initially estimated. Unless these adjustments qualify for capitalization, changes in environmental obligations are charged to operating income when they occur.


FCX performs a comprehensive review of its environmental obligations annually and also reviews changes in facts and circumstances associated with these obligations at least quarterly.


Asset Retirement Obligations.  FCX records the fair value of estimated asset retirement obligations (AROs) associated with tangible long-lived assets in the period incurred. Retirement obligationsAROs associated with long-lived assets are those for which there is a legal obligation to settle under existing or enacted law, statute, written or oral contract or by legal construction. These obligations, which are initially estimated based on discounted cash flow estimates, are accreted to full value over time through charges to cost of sales. In addition, asset retirement costs (ARCs) are capitalized as part of the related asset’s carrying value and are depreciated over the asset’s respective useful life.


For mining operations, reclamation costs for disturbances are recognized as an ARO and as a related ARC in the period of the disturbance and depreciated primarily on a UOP basis. FCX’s AROs for mining operations consist primarily of costs associated with mine reclamation and closure activities. These activities, which are site specific, generally include costs for earthwork, revegetation, water treatment and demolition.

For oil and gas properties, the fair value of the legal obligation is recognized as an ARO and as a related ARC in the period in which the well is drilled or acquired and is amortized on a UOP basis together with other capitalized costs. Substantially all of FCX’s oil and gas leases require that, upon termination of economic production, the working interest owners plug and abandon non-producing wellbores; remove platforms, tanks, production equipment and flow lines; and restore the wellsite.


For non-operating properties without reserves, changes to the ARO are recorded in earnings.


At least annually, FCX reviews its ARO estimates for changes in the projected timing of certain reclamation and closure/restoration costs, changes in cost estimates and additional AROs incurred during the period. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.



121

Revenue Recognition.  Effective January 1, 2018, FCX adopted the new revenue recognition accounting standard, which did not result in any financial statement impacts or changes to FCX’s revenue recognition policies or processes as revenue is primarily derived from arrangements in which the transfer of control coincides with the fulfillment of performance obligations. 

FCX recognizes revenue for all of its products upon transfer of control in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those products. Transfer of control is in accordance with the terms of customer contracts, which is generally upon shipment or delivery of the product. While payment terms vary by contract, terms generally include payment to be made within 30 days, but not longer than 60 days. Certain of FCX’s concentrate and cathode sales contracts also provide for provisional pricing, which is accounted for as an embedded derivative (refer to Note 14 for further discussion). For provisionally priced sales, 90 percent to 100 percent of the provisional paymentinvoice amount is madecollected upon shipment or within 20 days, and final balances are settled in a contractually specified future month (generally one to four months from the shipment date) based on quoted monthly average copper settlement prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) or the Commodity Exchange Inc. (COMEX), a division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, and quoted monthly average London Bullion Market Association (LBMA)(London) PM gold settlement prices.


FCX’s product revenues are also recorded net of treatment charges, royalties and export duties. Moreover, because a portion of the metals contained in copper concentrate is unrecoverable as a result of the smelting process, FCX’s revenues from concentrate sales are also recorded net of allowances based on the quantity and value of these unrecoverable metals. These allowances are a negotiated term of FCX’s contracts and vary by customer. Treatment and refining charges represent payments or price adjustments to smelters and refiners that are generally fixed. Refer to Note 16 for a summary of revenue by product type.


Gold sales are priced according to individual contract terms, generally the average LBMALondon PM gold settlement price for a specified month near the month of shipment.


The majority of FCX’s molybdenum sales are priced based on the average published Metals Week price, plus conversion premiums for products that undergo additional processing, such as ferromolybdenum and molybdenum chemical products, for the month prior to the month of shipment.


Stock-Based Compensation. Compensation costs for share-based payments to employees are measured at fair value and charged to expense over the requisite service period for awards that are expected to vest. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. The fair value for stock-settled restricted stock units (RSUs) is based on FCX’s stock price on the date of grant. Shares of common stock are issued at the vesting date for stock-settled RSUs. The fair value of performance share units (PSUs) are determined using FCX’s stock price and a Monte-Carlo simulation model. The fair value for liability-classified awards (i.e., cash-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), cash-settled RSUs and cash-settled PSUs)RSUs) is remeasured each reporting period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model for SARs and FCX’s stock price for cash-settled RSUs and cash-settled PSUs.price. FCX has elected to recognize compensation costs for stock option awards and SARs that vest over several years on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, and for RSUs and cash-settled PSUs on the graded-vesting method over the vesting period. Refer to Note 10 for further discussion.


Earnings Per Share.  FCX calculates its basic net income (loss) per share of common stock under the two-class method and calculates its diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the treasury-stock method. Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock was computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders (after deducting accumulated dividends and undistributed earnings to participating securities) by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock was calculated by including the basic weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding adjusted for the effects of all potential dilutive shares of common stock, unless their effect would be anti-dilutive.



122

Reconciliations of net income (loss) and weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31 follow:
 202120202019 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$5,365 $865 $(192)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests(1,059)(266)(50)
Accumulated dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(7)(3)(3)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders4,299 596 (245)
Net income from discontinued operations— — 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$4,299 $596 $(242)
Basic weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding (millions)1,466 1,453 1,451 
Add shares issuable upon exercise or vesting of dilutive stock options and RSUs (millions)16 

— a
Diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding (millions)1,482 1,461 1,451 
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Continuing operations$2.93 $0.41 $(0.17)
Discontinued operations— — — 
$2.93 $0.41 $(0.17)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Continuing operations$2.90 $0.41 $(0.17)
Discontinued operations— — — 
$2.90 $0.41 $(0.17)
 2018 2017 2016 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$2,909
 $2,029
 $(3,832) 
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests(292) (274) (227) 
Gain on redemption and preferred dividends attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
 161
 
Accumulated dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(4) (4) (3) 
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders2,613
 1,751
 (3,901) 
       
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(15) 66
 (193) 
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
 (4) (63) 
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders(15) 62
 (256) 
       
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$2,598
 $1,813
 $(4,157) 
       
Basic weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding (millions)1,449
 1,447
 1,318
 
Add shares issuable upon exercise or vesting of dilutive stock options and RSUs (millions)9
a 
7
 
a 
Diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding (millions)1,458
 1,454
 1,318
 
       
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:      
Continuing operations$1.80
 $1.21
 $(2.96) 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20) 
 $1.79
 $1.25
 $(3.16) 
       
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:      
Continuing operations$1.79
 $1.21
 $(2.96) 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 0.04
 (0.20) 
 $1.78
 $1.25
 $(3.16) 
a.Excludes approximately 11 million shares of common stock in 2019 associated with outstanding stock options with exercise prices less than the average market price of FCX’s common stock and RSUs that were anti-dilutive.
a.Excludes approximately 1 million in 2018 and 12 million in 2016 associated with outstanding stock options with exercise prices less than the average market price of FCX’s common stock and RSUs that were anti-dilutive.


Outstanding stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price of FCX’s common stock during the year are excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock. Stock options for 375 million shares of common stock in 2021, 31 million shares in 2020 and 42 million shares in 2019 were excluded in 2018, 41 million in 2017 and 46 million in 2016.excluded.


New Accounting Standards. Following is a discussion of new accounting standards.

Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) related to revenue recognition. FCX adopted this standard effective January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective approach applied to contracts that remain in force at the adoption date. The adoption of this standard did not result in any financial statement impacts or changes to FCX’s revenue recognition policies or processes as revenue is primarily derived from arrangements in which the transfer of control coincides with the fulfillment of performance obligations (refer to Revenue Recognition policy in this note)Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI). In connection with the adoption of the standard and consistent with FCX’s policy prior to adoption of the standard, FCX has elected to account for shipping and handling activities performed after control of goods has been transferredtreat taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to a customerGILTI as a fulfillment cost recorded in production and delivery costs on the consolidated statements of operations.current period expense when incurred.



Financial Instruments. In January 2016, FASB issued an ASU that amends the guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU makes limited changes to prior guidance and amends certain disclosure requirements. FCX adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018, and adoption did not have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2016, FASB issued an ASU that requires entities to estimate all expected credit losses for most financial assets held at the reporting date based on an expected loss model, which requires consideration of historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU also requires enhanced disclosure requirements to enable users of financial statements to understand the entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating expected credit losses.Reclassifications. For public companies, this ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. FCX is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its financial statements.

Leases. In February 2016, FASB issued an ASU that will require lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. FCX adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2019, and elected the practical expedient allowing it to apply the provisions of the updated lease guidance at the January 1, 2019, effective date, without adjusting the comparative periods presented. FCX also elected an accounting policy to not recognize a lease asset and liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less and a purchase option that is not expected to be exercised. FCX completed an assessment of its lease portfolio, implemented a new information technology system, and designed processes and controls to account for its leases in accordance with the new standard. FCX has concluded that the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on its financial statements. FCX will begin making the required lease disclosures under the ASU beginning with its March 31, 2019, quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Statement of Cash Flows. In November 2016, FASB issued an ASU that changes the classification and presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires that a statement of cash flows include the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. FCX adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018, and adjusted its consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, to include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents.

The impact of adopting this ASU for the years ended December 31 follows:
  2017
  Previously Reported Impact of Adoption 
After Adoptiona
Accrued income taxes and changes in other tax payments included in cash flow from operating activities $473
 $(16) $457
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,682
 (16) 4,666
Other, net included in cash flow from investing activities (25) 42
 17
Net cash used in investing activities (1,363) 42
 (1,321)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents 264
 26
 290
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year 4,245
 158
 4,403
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of period 4,447
 184
 4,631

  2016
  Previously Reported Impact of Adoption 
After Adoptiona
Other, net included in cash flow from operating activities $48
 $8
 $56
Net cash provided by operating activities 3,729
 8
 3,737
Other, net included in cash flow from investing activities 8
 3
 11
Net cash provided by investing activities 3,550
 3
 3,553
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents 4,113
 11
 4,124
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year 177
 147
 324
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of period 4,245
 158
 4,403
a.Excludes the reclassification of assets held for sale and other adjustments to conform with the current year presentation.

Net Periodic Pension and Postretirement Benefit Cost. In March 2017, FASB issued an ASU that changes how entities with defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans present net periodic benefit cost in the income statement. This ASU requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item or items as other compensation costs for those employees who are receiving the benefit. In addition, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization when applicable (i.e., as a cost of inventory or an internally constructed asset). The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented separately from the service cost component and outside of operating income. These other components of net periodic benefit cost are not eligible for capitalization, and FCX elected to include these other components in other income (expense), net. FCX adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018, and adjusted its presentation in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, to conform with the new guidance. The impact of adopting this ASU for the years ended December 31 follows:
  2017
  Previously Reported Impact of Adoption Current Presentation
Production and delivery $10,308
a 
$(42) $10,266
Total cost of sales 12,022
 (42) 11,980
Selling, general and administrative expenses 484
 (7) 477
Mining exploration and research expenses 94
 (1) 93
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs 251
 (7) 244
Total costs and expenses 12,770
 (57) 12,713
Operating income 3,633
 57
 3,690
Other income (expense), net 49
 (57) (8)
  2016
  Previously Reported Impact of Adoption Current Presentation
Production and delivery $10,733
a 
$(46) $10,687
Total cost of sales 17,580
 (46) 17,534
Selling, general and administrative expenses 607
 (10) 597
Mining exploration and research expenses 64
 (1) 63
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs 20
 (6) 14
Total costs and expenses 17,622
 (63) 17,559
Operating loss (2,792) 63
 (2,729)
Other income (expense), net 49
 (63) (14)
a.
Includes $8 millionfor metals inventory adjustments in 2017 and $36 millionin 2016.


Tax Reform Reclassification. In February 2018, FASB issued an ASU that allows entities to elect to reclassify the stranded income tax effects caused by the December 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. This election applies to the U.S. federal income tax rate change from 35 percent to 21 percent. FCX elected to early adopt this standard effective July 1, 2018, which resulted in a one-time reclassification totaling $79 million from AOCI to retained earnings in third-quarter 2018. FCX has not elected to reclassify other “indirect” income tax effects of the Act stranded in AOCI. Any additional income tax effects stranded in AOCI will continue to pass through earnings in future periods as specific classes of AOCI items are reversed.

Fair Value Measurement. In August 2018, FASB issued an ASU in connection with the disclosure framework project that modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. FCX early adopted this ASU in third-quarter 2018, which did not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Defined Benefit Plans. In August 2018, FASB issued an ASU in connection with the disclosure framework project that modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. FCX early adopted this ASU in fourth-quarter 2018, which did not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Reclassifications. As a result of adopting new accounting standards in 2018 (refer to New Accounting Standards in this Note) and the reclassification of assets held for sale (refer to Note 2),purposes, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to other, net on FCX’s consolidated statements of cash flows to conform with the current year presentation. Additionally, FCX has revised prior year amounts related to activities associated with its reserve for unrecognized tax benefits in conjunction with uncertain tax positions. See Note 11 for further detail.


Subsequent Events. FCX evaluated events after December 31, 2021, and through the date the financial statements were issued, and determined any events or transactions occurring during this period that would require recognition or disclosure are appropriately addressed in these financial statements.

123

NOTE 2. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
Cobalt Business. In September 2021, FCX’s 56-percent-owned subsidiary, Koboltti Chemicals Holdings Limited (KCHL), completed the sale of its remaining cobalt business based in Kokkola, Finland (Freeport Cobalt) to Jervois Global Limited (Jervois) for $208 million (before post-closing adjustments), consisting of cash consideration of $173 million and 7 percent of Jervois common stock (valued at $35 million at the time of closing). At closing, Freeport Cobalt’s assets included cash of approximately $20 million and other net assets of $125 million. FCX recorded a gain of $60 million ($34 million to net income attributable to common stock) in 2021 associated with this transaction. In addition, KCHL will have the right to receive contingent consideration of up to $40 million based on the future performance of Freeport Cobalt. Any gain related to the contingent consideration will be recognized when received.

In fourth-quarter 2019, FCX completed the sale of its cobalt refinery in Kokkola, Finland, and related cobalt cathode precursor business (consisting of approximately $271 million of assets and $63 million of liabilities at the time of closing) to Umicorefor total cash consideration of approximately $200 million, including approximately $50 million of working capital. FCX recorded a gain of $59 million in 2019 ($33 million to net loss attributable to common stock) associated with this transaction.

Following these transactions, FCX no longer has cobalt operations.

PT Smelting. On April 30, 2021, PT-FI acquired 14.5 percent of the outstanding common stock of PT Smelting, a smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia, for $33 million, increasing its ownership interest from 25.0 percent to 39.5 percent. The remaining outstanding shares of PT Smelting continue to be owned by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation. PT-FI has continued to account for its investment in PT Smelting using the equity method since it does not have control over PT Smelting.

On November 30, 2021, PT-FI entered into a convertible loan agreement to fund the expansion of PT Smelting’s current capacity by 30 percent to 1.3 million metric tons of concentrate per year. Upon completion of the expansion project, targeted for year-end 2023, PT-FI’s loan will convert into PT Smelting equity resulting in a majority ownership interest and consolidation of PT Smelting in FCX’s consolidated financial statements.

Kisanfu Transaction. In December 2020, FCX completed the sale of its interests in the Kisanfu undeveloped project to a wholly owned subsidiary of China Molybdenum Co., Ltd. (CMOC) for $550 million, with after-tax net cash proceeds totaling $415 million. The Kisanfu project, located in the Democratic Republic of Congo, is an undeveloped cobalt and copper resource. FCX did not have any proven and probable mineral reserves associated with the Kisanfu project. FCX recorded a gain of $486 million in 2020 associated with this transaction.

Timok Transaction. In 2016, FCX sold an interest in the upper zone of the Timok exploration project in Serbia (the 2016 Transaction).

In December 2019, FCX completed the sale of its interest in the lower zone of the Timok exploration project to an affiliate of the purchaser in the 2016 Transaction, for cash consideration of $240 million at closing plus the right to future contingent payments of up to $150 million. These future contingent payments will be based on the future sale of products (as defined in the agreement) from the Timok lower zone. For a period of 12 months after the third anniversary of the initial sale of products from the Timok lower zone, the purchaser can settle, or FCX can demand payment of, such deferred payment obligation, in each case, for a total of $60 million. As these deferred payments are contingent upon future production (the Timok lower zone project is still pre-operational) and would result in gain recognition, no amounts were recorded upon the closing of the transaction. Subsequent recognition will be based on the gain contingency model, in which the consideration would be recorded in the period in which all contingencies are resolved and the gain is realized. This is expected to be when FCX (i) is provided periodic product sales information by the purchaser or (ii) gives notice to the purchaser or receives notice from the purchaser regarding the settlement of the deferred payments for $60 million.

In addition, in lieu of payment upon achievement of defined development milestones provided for in the 2016 Transaction, the purchaser agreed to pay $107 million in three installment payments of $45 million (collected in 2020), $50 million (collected in 2021), and $12 million by March 31, 2022. As a result of this transaction, FCX recorded a gain of $343 million in 2019, consisting of the cash consideration ($240 million) and the aggregate discounted amount of the three installment payments ($103 million).

124

TF Holdings Limited - Discontinued Operations. In 2016, FCX completed the sale of its70 percent interest in TF Holdings Limited (TFHL) to CMOC for $2.65 billion in cash (before closing adjustments) and contingent consideration of up to $120 million in cash, consisting of $60 million if the average copper price exceeded $3.50 per pound and $60 million if the average cobalt price exceeded $20 per pound, both during the 24-month period ending December 31, 2019.

The contingent consideration was considered a derivative, and the fair value was adjusted through December 31, 2019. FCX realized and collected in January 2020 contingent consideration of $60 million because the average cobalt price exceeded $20 per pound during the 24-month period ending December 31, 2019 (no amount was realized associated with the copper price). Gains resulting from changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration derivative totaling $3 million in 2019 were included in net income from discontinued operations and primarily resulted from fluctuations in cobalt prices. In accordance with accounting guidance, FCX reported the results from TFHL as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations because the disposal represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on operations.

NOTE 3.  OWNERSHIP IN SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURE
Ownership in Subsidiaries.  FMC produces copper and molybdenum from mines in North America and South America. At December 31, 2021, FMC’s operating mines in North America were Morenci, Bagdad, Safford (including Lone Star), Sierrita and Miami located in Arizona; Tyrone and Chino located in New Mexico; and Henderson and Climax located in Colorado. FMC has a 72 percent interest in Morenci (refer to “Joint Venture - Sumitomo and SMM Morenci, Inc.”) and owns 100 percent of the other North America mines. At December 31, 2021, operating mines in South America were Cerro Verde (53.56 percent owned) located in Peru and El Abra (51 percent owned) located in Chile. At December 31, 2021, FMC’s net assets totaled $18.4 billion and its accumulated deficit totaled $12.6 billion. FCX had $111 million in loans outstanding to FMC outstanding at December 31, 2021.

FCX owns 48.76 percent of PT-FI (refer to “PT-FI Divestment”). At December 31, 2021, PT-FI’s net assets totaled $12.7 billion and its retained earnings totaled $8.4 billion. FCX had no loans to PT-FI outstanding at December 31, 2021.

FCX owns 100 percent of the outstanding Atlantic Copper (FCX’s wholly owned smelting and refining unit in Spain) common stock. At December 31, 2021, Atlantic Copper’s net assets totaled $167 million and its accumulated deficit totaled $379 million. FCX had $274 million in loans to Atlantic Copper outstanding at December 31, 2021.

PT-FI Divestment. On December 21, 2018, FCX completed the transaction with the IndonesianIndonesia government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership.

ownership (the 2018 transaction). Pursuant to the previously announced divestment agreement and related documents, PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero) (PT Inalum)Inalum, also known as MIND ID), an IndonesianIndonesia state-owned enterprise, acquired for cash consideration of $3.85 billion all of Rio Tinto plc's (Rio Tinto) interests associated with its joint venture with PT-FI (the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture) and 100 percent of FCX's interests in PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral (PTI - formerly known as PT Indocopper Investama), which at the time owned 9.36 percent of PT-FI. Of the $3.85 billion in cash consideration, Rio Tinto received $3.5 billion, and FCX received $350 million. In addition, Rio Tinto paid FCX $107 million for its share of the 2018 joint venture cash flows..


In connection with the 2018 transaction, an aggregate 40 percent share ownership in PT-FI was issued to PT Inalum and PTI (which is expected to be owned by PT Inalum and the provincial/regional government in Papua). Based on a subscription of PT Inalum’s rights to acquire for cash consideration of $3.5 billion all of Rio Tinto’s interests in the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture, PT-FI acquired all of the common stock of the entity (PTPT Rio Tinto Indonesia)Indonesia that held the former Rio Tinto’sTinto Joint Venture interest. After the transaction, PT Inalum’s (26.24 percent) and PTI’s (25.00 percent) collective share ownership of PT-FI totals 51.24 percent and FCX's share ownership totals 48.76 percent. The arrangements provide for FCX and the other pre-transaction PT-FI shareholders (i.e., PT Inalum and PTI) to retain the economics of the revenue and cost sharing arrangements under the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture. As a result, FCX’s economic interest in PT-FI is expected to approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022.2022 and 48.67 percent thereafter (see further discussion below).


The divestment agreement provides that FCX will indemnify PT Inalum and PTI from any losses (reduced by receipts) arising from any tax disputes of PT-FI disclosed to PT Inalum in a Jakarta, Indonesia tax court letter limited to PTI’s respective percentage share at the time the loss is finally incurred. Any net obligations arising from any tax settlement would be paid on December 21, 2025.


FCX, PT-FI, PTI and PT Inalum entered into a shareholders agreement (the PT-FI Shareholders Agreement), which includes provisions related to the governance and management of PT-FI. FCX considered the terms of the PT-FI Shareholders Agreement and related governance structure, including whether PT Inalum has substantive participating rights, and concluded that it has retained control and would continue to consolidate PT-FI in its financial statements following the 2018 transaction. Among other terms, the governance arrangements under the PT-FI Shareholders Agreement transfers control over the management of PT-FI’s mining operations to an operating committee, which is controlled by FCX. Additionally, as discussed above, the existing PT-FI shareholders will retain the economics of the revenue and cost-sharingcost sharing arrangements under the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture, so that FCX’s economic interest in the project through 2041 will not be significantly affected by the transaction. FCX believes its conclusion to continue to consolidate PT-FI in its financial statements is in accordance with SECthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X, Rule 3A-02 (a), which provides for situations in which
125

consolidation of an entity, notwithstanding the lack of majority ownership, is necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the registrant, because of the existence of a parent-subsidiary relationship by means other than record ownership of voting stock.


Attribution of PT-FI Net Income or Loss.FCX also analyzedhas concluded that the attribution of PT-FI’s acquisitionnet income or loss from December 21, 2018 (the date of the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interests and concluded the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in mineral reserves and related long-lived mining assets. The acquisition was a single asset because substantially all of the acquired assets are linked to each other and cannot be physically removed without causing a significant diminution to the fair value of the other assets. PT-FI allocated the $3.5 billion purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The fair value estimates were based on, but not limited to, long-term metal price assumptions of $3.00 per pound of copper and $1,300 per ounce of gold; expected future cash flows based on estimated reserve quantities; costs to produce and develop the related reserves; current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain fixed assets; and appropriate discount rates using an estimated international cost of capital of 14 percent. The estimates were primarily based on significant inputs not observable in the market (as discussed above) and thus represent Level 3 measurements.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price:
Current assets $25
 
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs:   
Mineral reserves 3,056
 
Mine development, infrastructure and other 1,559
 
Liabilities other than taxes (77) 
Deferred income taxes, net (1,063)
a 
Total purchase price $3,500
 
a.Deferred income taxes have been recognized on the fair value adjustments to net assets using an Indonesia corporate income tax rate of 25 percent.

Under applicable accounting guidance, changes in ownership that do not result in a change in control are accounted for as equity transactions with no impact on net income. The following table summarizes the consolidated impact of the transaction discussed above on FCX’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 21, 2018:
Cash $458
 
Other current assets 23
 
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs:   
Mineral reserves 3,056
 
Mine development, infrastructure and other 1,559
 
Liabilities other than taxes (77) 
Deferred income taxes, net (788) 
Noncontrolling interests (4,762)
a 
Capital in excess of par value 531
 
a.Primarily reflects the approximate 40 percent economic interest in the former Rio Tinto Joint Venture for the period from 2023 through 2041, which was acquired by PTI and PT Inalum.


FCX considered if the adjustment to capital in excess of par value was an indicator of impairment and after considering other factors, such as PT-FI’s historical results and projected undiscounted cash flows, concluded that it did not indicate a potential impairment at PT-FI.

TF Holdings Limited - Discontinued Operations. On November 16, 2016, FCX completed the sale of its70 percent interest in TF Holdings Limited (TFHL) to China Molybdenum Co.divestment transaction), Ltd. (CMOC) for $2.65 billion in cash (before closing adjustments) and contingent consideration of up to $120 million in cash, consisting of $60 million if the average copper price exceeds $3.50 per pound and $60 million if the average cobalt price exceeds $20 per pound, both during the 24-month period beginning January 1, 2018. One-half of the proceeds from this transaction was used to repay borrowings under FCX’s unsecured bank term loan.

The contingent consideration is considered a derivative, and the fair value will be adjusted through December 31, 2019.2022 (the Initial Period), should be based on the economics replacement agreement, as previously discussed. The fair valueeconomics replacement agreement entitles FCX to approximately 81 percent of PT-FI dividends paid during the contingent consideration derivative (included inInitial Period, with the remaining 19 percent paid to the noncontrolling interests. PT-FI paid dividends totaling $1.3 billion during 2021, of which $1.0 billion was paid to FCX. No other assets individends have been paid by PT-FI during the consolidated balance sheets)Initial Period. PT-FI’s net income for 2021 totaled $2.4 billion, of which $2.0 billion was $57attributed to FCX, and $765 million atfor 2020, of which $621 million was attributed to FCX. PT-FI’s net loss for 2019 totaled $203 million, of which $165 million was attributed to FCX. PT-FI’s cumulative net income from December 21, 2018, through December 31, 2018, and $74 million at December 31, 2017. (Losses) gains resulting from changes in the fair value2021, totaled $2.9 billion, of the contingent consideration derivative ($(17) million in 2018, $61 million in 2017 and $13 million in 2016) are included in net (loss) income from discontinued operations and primarily resulted from fluctuations in cobalt and copper prices. Future changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration derivative will continuewhich $2.3 billion was attributed to be recorded in discontinued operations.FCX.
In accordance with accounting guidance, FCX reported the results of operations of TFHL as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations because the disposal represents a strategic shift that had a major effect on operations. The consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) were not impacted by discontinued operations as TFHL did not have any other comprehensive income (loss), and the consolidated statements of cash flows are reported on a combined basis without separately presenting discontinued operations.

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following:
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2018 2017 2016 
Revenuesa
$
 $13
 $959
 
Costs and expenses:      
Production and delivery costs
 
 833
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization


 80
b 
Interest expense allocated from parent
 
 39
c 
Other costs and expenses, net
 
 10
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and net (loss) gain on disposal
 13
 (3) 
Net (loss) gain on disposal(15)
d 
57
d 
(198)
e 
Net (loss) income before income taxes(15) 70
 (201) 
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes
 (4) 8
 
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations$(15) $66
 $(193) 
a.In accordance with accounting guidance, amounts are net of recognition (eliminations) of intercompany sales totaling $13 million in 2017 and $(157) million in 2016.
b.In accordance with accounting guidance, depreciation, depletion and amortization was suspended subsequent to classification as assets held for sale, which occurred in May 2016.
c.In accordance with accounting guidance, interest associated with FCX’s unsecured bank term loan that was required to be repaid as a result of the sale of TFHL has been allocated to discontinued operations.
d.Includes a (loss) gain of $(17) million in 2018 and $61 million in 2017 associated with the change in the fair value of contingent consideration.
e.Includes a charge of $33 million associated with the settlement agreement entered into with Gécamines, partly offset by a gain of $13 million for the fair value of contingent consideration.


Cash flows from discontinued operations included in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, follow:
    
Net cash provided by operating activities  $241
Net cash used in investing activities  (73)
Net cash used in financing activities  (123)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents  $45

Assets Held for Sale. As a result of the 2016 sale of TFHL, FCX planned to sell its effective 56 percent interest in Freeport Cobalt and its wholly owned Kisanfu exploration project. Freeport Cobalt includes the large-scale cobalt refinery in Kokkola, Finland, and the related sales and marketing business. Kisanfu is a copper and cobalt exploration project, located near Tenke in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The assets and liabilities of Freeport Cobalt and Kisanfu were previously classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017, and a $110 million estimated loss on disposal was recognized in 2016 when these assets were classified as held for sale (included in net gain on sales of assets in the consolidated statements of operations).

FCX is continuing to assess opportunities for its Kisanfu copper and cobalt exploration project, including development of the project on its own or a sale of all or a minority stake in the project. In 2017, a gain of $13 million was recorded to adjust the Kisanfu assets to their carrying value when they were initially classified as held for sale. In second-quarter 2018, management concluded it no longer believes that it is probable an outright sale will occur in the near term and the related assets and liabilities should no longer be classified as held for sale. Because of this conclusion, revisions to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, included a $90 million increase to property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net, with an offsetting reduction in current assets held for sale, and a $27 million increase to deferred income taxes, with an offsetting reduction in current liabilities held for sale.

FCX continues to market the Freeport Cobalt assets, but concluded that they no longer qualified as held for sale as of December 31, 2018. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, during 2018, FCX recorded a gain of $97 million to adjust the Freeport Cobalt assets to their carrying value when they were initially classified as held for sale. During fourth-quarter 2018, FCX also recorded $48 million of depreciation, depletion and amortization expense that was suspended while the assets were held for sale from December 2016 through September 2018. The carrying amounts of Freeport Cobalt’s major classes of assets and liabilities, which were reclassified from held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017, follow:
Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents $79
Trade receivables 76
Inventories 256
Other receivables and current assets 20
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net 60
Other assets 3
Total previously included in current assets held for sale $494
   
Liabilities  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $176
Accrued income taxes 18
Long-term debt 112
Deferred income taxes and asset retirement obligations 17
Total previously included in current liabilities held for sale $323


Morenci. In May 2016, FCX sold a 13 percent undivided interest in its Morenci unincorporated joint venture to SMM Morenci, Inc. for $1.0 billion in cash. FCX recorded a $576 million gain on the transaction and used losses to offset cash taxes on the transaction. A portion of the proceeds from the transaction was used to repay borrowings under FCX’s unsecured bank term loan and revolving credit facility.


The Morenci unincorporated joint venture was owned 85above-described attribution of PT-FI’s net income or loss applies only through the Initial Period. Beginning January 1, 2023, the attribution of PT-FI’s net income or loss will be based on equity ownership percentages (48.76 percent byfor FCX, 26.24 percent for PT Inalum and 1525.00 percent by Sumitomo Metal Mining Arizona, Inc. (Sumitomo). As a result of the transaction, the unincorporated joint venture is owned 72 percent by FCX, 15 percent by Sumitomo and 13 percent by SMM Morenci, Inc. (an affiliate of Sumitomo Metal Mining Co, Ltd.)for PTI).


Timok. In May 2016, FMC sold an interest in the Timok exploration project in Serbia to Global Reservoir Minerals Inc. (now known as Nevsun Resources, Ltd.) for consideration of $135 million in cash and contingent consideration of up to $107 million payable to FCX in stages upon achievement of defined development milestones. As a result of this transaction, FCX recorded a gain of $133 million in 2016, and no amounts were recorded for contingent consideration under the loss recovery approach. A portion of the proceeds from the transaction was used to repay borrowings under FCX’s unsecured bank term loan.

Oil and Gas Operations.In 2018, FCX Oil & Gas LLC (FM O&G) disposed of certain property interests that resulted in the recognition of a gain of $27 million, primarily associated with the abandonment obligations that were assumed by the acquirer. In 2017, FM O&G sold certain property interests for cash consideration of $80 million (before closing adjustments). Under the full cost accounting rules, the sales resulted in the recognition of gains of $49 million in 2017.

In December 2016, FM O&G completed the saleFor all of its onshore California oil and gas properties to Sentinel Peak Resources California LLC (Sentinel) for cash consideration of $592 million (before closing adjustments from the July 1, 2016, effective date) and contingent consideration of up to $150 million, consisting of $50 million per year for 2018, 2019 and 2020 if the price of Brent crude oil averages over $70 per barrel in each of these calendar years. The contingent consideration is considered a derivative, and the fair value will be adjusted through the year 2020. The fair value of the contingent consideration derivative (included in other assets in thepartially owned consolidated balance sheets) was $16 million at December 31, 2018, and $34 million at December 31, 2017. The contingent consideration of $50 million for 2018 was realized because the average Brent crude oil price exceeded $70 per barrel for the year and was included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018. Future changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration derivative will continue to be recorded in operating income. Sentinel assumed abandonment obligations associated with the properties.

In December 2016, FM O&G completed the sale of its Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) oil and gas properties to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (Anadarko) for cash consideration of $2.0 billion (before closing adjustments from the August 1, 2016, effective date) and up to $150 million in contingent payments. The contingent payments were recorded under the loss recovery approach, whereby contingent gains are recorded up to the amount of any loss on the sale, and reduced the loss on the sale in 2016. The contingent payments were included in other current assets ($27 million) and other assets ($116 million) at December 31, 2018, and in other current assets ($24 million) and other assets ($126 million) at December 31, 2017, in the consolidated balance sheets. The contingent payments will be received over time ($7 million was collected in 2018) as Anadarko realizes future cash flows in connection with a third-party production handling agreement for an offshore platform. Anadarko assumed abandonment obligations associated with these properties. A portion of the proceeds from this transaction was used to repay FCX’s remaining outstanding borrowings under its unsecured bank term loan.

Under the full cost accounting rules, the sales of the Deepwater GOM and onshore California oil and gas properties required gain (loss) recognition (net loss of $9 million in 2016, which wassubsidiaries, FCX attributes net of $150 million for contingent payments associated with the Deepwater GOM sale and $33 million for the fair value of contingent consideration from the onshore California sale) because of their significance to the full cost pool.

In connection with the sale of the Deepwater GOM oil and gas properties, FM O&G entered into an agreement to amend the terms of the Plains Offshore Operations Inc. Preferred Stock that was reported as redeemable noncontrolling interest on FCX’s financial statements. The amendment provided FM O&G the right to call these securities for $582 million. FM O&G exercised this option in December 2016 and recorded a $199 million gain on redemption to retained earnings.


In July 2016, FM O&G sold its Haynesville shale assets for cash consideration of $87 million, before closing adjustments. In June 2016, FM O&G sold certain oil and gas royalty interests to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. for cash consideration of $102 million, before closing adjustments. Under the full cost accounting rules, the proceeds from these transactions were recorded as a reduction of capitalized oil and gas properties, with no gainincome or loss recognition in 2016 because the reserves were not significant to the full cost pool.based on equity ownership percentages.


NOTE 3.  OWNERSHIP IN SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINT VENTURES
Ownership in Subsidiaries.  FMC produces copper and molybdenum, with mines in North America and South America. At December 31, 2018, FMC’s operating mines in North America were Morenci, Bagdad, Safford, Sierrita and Miami located in Arizona; Tyrone and Chino located in New Mexico; and Henderson and Climax located in Colorado. FCX has a 72 percent interest (subsequent to the sale of a 13 percent undivided interest on May 31, 2016) in Morenci (refer to “Joint Ventures – Joint Venture.Sumitomo and SMM Morenci, Inc.”) and owns 100 percent of the other North America mines. At December 31, 2018, operating mines in South America were Cerro Verde (53.56 percent owned) located in Peru and El Abra (51 percent owned) located in Chile. At December 31, 2018, FMC’s net assets totaled $16.0 billion and its accumulated deficit totaled $14.0 billion. FCX had no loans outstanding to FMC at December 31, 2018.

FCX’s direct share ownership in PT-FI totaled 81.28 percent through December 21, 2018, and 48.76 percent thereafter. PTI owned 9.36 percent of PT-FI through December 21, 2018, and FCX owned 100 percent of PTI through December 21, 2018. Refer to Note 2 for a discussion of the PT-FI divestment. Refer to “Joint Ventures - Former Rio Tinto Joint Venture” for discussion of PT-FI’s unincorporated joint venture. At December 31, 2018, PT-FI’s net assets totaled $10.5 billion and its retained earnings totaled $6.6 billion. FCX had $76 million in intercompany loans to PT-FI outstanding at December 31, 2018.

FCX owns 100 percent of the outstanding Atlantic Copper common stock. At December 31, 2018, Atlantic Copper’s net liabilities totaled $23 million and its accumulated deficit totaled $436 million. FCX had $434 million in intercompany loans to Atlantic Copper outstanding at December 31, 2018.

FCX owns 100 percent of FM O&G, which, as of December 31, 2018, has oil and gas assets that primarily include natural gas production onshore in South Louisiana and oil production offshore California. At December 31, 2018, FM O&G’s net liabilities totaled $14.2 billion and its accumulated deficit totaled $25.8 billion. FCX had $10.6 billion in intercompany loans to FM O&G outstanding at December 31, 2018, which were fully impaired.

Joint Ventures.  FCX has the following unincorporated joint ventures.

Former Rio Tinto Joint Venture. On December 21, 2018, PT-FI acquired Rio Tinto’s interest in the joint venture and is consolidating 100 percent of the Indonesia operations (refer to Note 2 for discussion of the PT-FI divestment). Pursuant to Rio Tinto’s previous joint venture agreement with PT-FI, Rio Tinto had a 40 percent interest in certain assets and future production exceeding specified annual amounts of copper, gold and silver through 2022 in Block A of PT-FI’s former Contract of Work (COW), and, after 2022, a 40 percent interest in all production from Block A. The amount due Rio Tinto for its share of joint venture cash flows was $30 million at December 31, 2017.

Sumitomo and SMM Morenci, Inc. FMC owns a 72 percent undivided interest in Morenci via an unincorporated joint venture. The remaining 28 percent is owned by Sumitomo (15 percent) and SMM Morenci, Inc. (13 percent). Each partner takes in kind its share of Morenci’s production. FMC purchased 17882 million pounds of Morenci’s copper cathode from Sumitomo and SMM Morenci, Inc. at market prices for $519$349 million during 2018.2021. FMC had receivables from Sumitomo and SMM Morenci, Inc. totaling $13$20 million at December 31, 2018,2021, and $18$15 million at December 31, 2017.2020.



NOTE 4.  INVENTORIES, INCLUDING LONG-TERM MILL AND LEACH STOCKPILES
The components of inventories follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Current inventories:
Total materials and supplies, neta
$1,669 $1,594 
Mill stockpiles$193 $205 
Leach stockpiles977 809 
Total current mill and leach stockpiles$1,170 $1,014 
Raw materials (primarily concentrate)$536 $366 
Work-in-process195 174 
Finished goods927 745 
Total product$1,658 $1,285 
Long-term inventories:
Mill stockpiles$226 $223 
Leach stockpiles1,161 1,240 
Total long-term mill and leach stockpilesb
$1,387 $1,463 
 December 31, 
 2018 2017 
Current inventories:    
Total materials and supplies, neta
$1,528
 $1,323
 
     
Mill stockpiles$282
 $360
 
Leach stockpiles1,171
 1,062
 
Total current mill and leach stockpiles$1,453
 $1,422
 
     
Raw materials (primarily concentrate)$260
 $265
 
Work-in-process192
 154
 
Finished goods1,326
 985
 
Total product inventories$1,778
 $1,404
 
     
Long-term inventories:    
Mill stockpiles$265
 $300
 
Leach stockpiles1,049
 1,109
 
Total long-term inventoriesb
$1,314
 $1,409
 
a.Materials and supplies inventory was net of obsolescence reserves totaling $36 million at December 31, 2021, and $32 million at December 31, 2020.
a.Materials and supplies inventory was net of obsolescence reserves totaling $24 million at December 31, 2018, and $29 million at December 31, 2017.
b.Estimated metals in stockpiles not expected to be recovered within the next 12 months.

b.Estimated metals in stockpiles not expected to be recovered within the next 12 months.

FCX recorded charges forNRV inventory adjustments to decrease metals inventory carrying values of $4totaling $16 million in 2018, $82021, primarily associated with stockpiles no longer expected to be leached; $96 million in 20172020, associated with lower market prices for copper ($58 million) and $36molybdenum ($38 million); and $179 million in 2016 (primarily2019, associated with lower market prices for molybdenum inventories)($84 million), cobalt ($58 million) and copper ($37 million). Refer to Note 16 for metals inventory adjustments by business segment.


126

FCX's Morenci mine has experienced improved recoveries at certain of its leach stockpiles and following an analysis of column testing results, Morenci concluded it had sufficient evidence to increase its estimated recoveries for certain of its leach stockpiles effective July 1, 2021. As a result of the revised recoveries, Morenci increased its estimated recoverable copper in leach stockpiles, net to its joint venture interest, by 191 million pounds. The effect of this change in estimate reduced site production and delivery costs and increased net income by $112 million ($0.08 per share) in 2021.

NOTE 5.  PROPERTY, PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND MINE DEVELOPMENT COSTS, NET
The components of net property, plant, equipment and mine development costs follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Proven and probable mineral reserves$7,142 $7,142 
VBPP376 376 
Mine development and other11,309 10,686 
Buildings and infrastructure9,412 9,214 
Machinery and equipment14,399 14,235 
Mobile equipment4,605 4,495 
Construction in progress2,477 1,454 
Oil and gas properties27,298 27,281 
Total77,018 74,883 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortizationa
(46,673)(45,065)
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net$30,345 $29,818 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Proven and probable mineral reserves$7,089
 $3,974
VBPP477
 536
Mine development and other8,195
 6,213
Buildings and infrastructure8,051
 7,553
Machinery and equipment12,985
 12,330
Mobile equipment4,010
 3,766
Construction in progress3,006
 2,971
Oil and gas properties27,292
 27,453
Total71,105
 64,796
Accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortizationa
(43,095) (41,802)
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net$28,010
 $22,994
a.Includes accumulated amortization of $27.3 billion and $27.4 billion for oil and gas properties at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

a.Includes accumulated amortization for oil and gas properties of $27.3 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
In 2018, FCX recorded $4.6 billion for proven and probable mineral reserves and other property, plant, equipment and mine development costs associated with the acquisition of PT Rio Tinto Indonesia (refer to Note 2 for further discussion).


FCX recorded $1.7$1.6 billion for VBPP in connection with the FMC acquisition in 2007 (excluding $544$634 million associated with mining operations that were subsequently sold) and transferred $59$811 million to proven and probable mineral reserves during 2018through 2021 (none in 2021 and $752 million prior to 2018 ($112less than $0.1 million in 2017)2020). Cumulative impairments of and adjustments to VBPP total $485$497 million, which were primarily recorded in 2008.


Capitalized interest, which primarily related to FCX’s mining operations’ capital projects, totaled $96$72 million in 2018, $1212021, $147 million in 20172020 and $92$149 million in 2016.2019.



During 2017 and 2018, FCX concluded there werethe three-year period ended December 31, 2021, no events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that the carrying amountmaterial impairments of itsFCX’s long-lived mining assets might not be recoverable.were recorded.


127

NOTE 6.  OTHER ASSETS
The components of other assets follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Intangible assetsa
$412 $401 
Legally restricted fundsb
209 213 
Disputed tax assessments:c
Cerro Verde237 190 
PT-FI57 143 
Long-term receivable for taxesd
84 106 
Investments:  
Assurance bonde
132 148 
Fixed income, equity securities and other74 70 
PT Smeltingf
26 77 
Contingent consideration associated with sales of assetsg
70 96 
Loans to PT Smeltingh
36 — 
Long-term employee receivables20 19 
Other103 97 
Total other assets$1,460 $1,560 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Disputed tax assessments:a
   
PT-FI$493
 $417
Cerro Verde183
 185
Long-term receivable for taxesb
260
 445
Intangible assetsc
398
 307
Investments:   
Assurance bondd
126
 123
PT Smeltinge
125
 61
Fixed income and equity securities29
 30
Other36
 48
Contingent consideration associated with sales of assetsf
189
 234
Legally restricted fundsg
181
 189
Rio Tinto’s share of ARO
 68
Long-term employee receivables20
 20
Other132
 146
Total other assets$2,172
 $2,273
a.
Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
b.Includes tax overpayments and refunds not expected to be realized within the next 12 months (primarily associated with U.S. tax reform, refer to Note 11).
c.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets totaled $215 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Accumulated amortization of definite-lived intangible assets totaled $51 million at December 31, 2018, and $46 million at December 31, 2017.
d.Relates to PT-FI’s commitment for the development of a new smelter in Indonesia (refer to Note 13 for further discussion).
e.
PT-FI’s 25 percent ownership in PT Smelting (smelter and refinery in Gresik, Indonesia) is recorded using the equity method. Amounts were reduced by unrecognized profits on sales from PT-FI to PT Smelting totaling $11 million at December 31, 2018, and $68 million at December 31, 2017. Trade accounts receivable from PT Smelting totaled $176 million at December 31, 2018, and $308 million at December 31, 2017.
f.Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
g.
Includes $180 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, held in trusts for AROs related to properties in New Mexico (refer to Note 12 for further discussion).

a.Indefinite-lived intangible assets totaled $215 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Accumulated amortization of definite-lived intangible assets totaled $35 million at December 31, 2021, and $32 million at December 31, 2020.
b.Includes $208 million at December 31, 2021, and $212 millionat December 31, 2020, held in trusts for AROs related to properties in New Mexico (refer to Note 12 for further discussion).
c.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
d.Includes tax overpayments and refunds not expected to be realized within the next 12 months.
e.Relates to PT-FI’s commitment for the development of a greenfield smelter in Indonesia (refer to Note 13 for further discussion).
f.PT-FI’s ownership in PT Smelting is recorded using the equity method. Amounts were reduced by unrecognized profits on sales from PT-FI to PT Smelting totaling $126 million at December 31, 2021, and $39 million at December 31, 2020. Trade accounts receivable from PT Smelting totaled $411 million at December 31, 2021, and $265 million at December 31, 2020.
g.Refer to Note 15 for further discussion.
h.Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.

NOTE 7.  ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
The components of accounts payable and accrued liabilities follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Accounts payable$2,035 $1,473 
Salaries, wages and other compensation334 312 
PT-FI contingenciesa
259 196 
Accrued interestb
203 243 
Deferred revenue191 65 
Pension, postretirement, postemployment and other employee benefitsc
190 91 
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes64 76 
Leasesd
38 38 
Litigation accruals28 86 
Other153 128 
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities$3,495 $2,708 
a.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
b.Third-party interest paid, net of capitalized interest, was $640 million in 2021, $472 million in 2020 and $591 million in 2019.
c.Refer to Note 9 for long-term portion.
d.Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.
128
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Accounts payable$1,661
 $1,546
Salaries, wages and other compensation273
 241
Accrued interesta
183
 168
PT-FI contingenciesb
162
 
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes109
 129
Pension, postretirement, postemployment and other employee benefitsc
78
 114
Deferred revenue35
 91
Accrued mining royalties29
 68
Other95
 140
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities$2,625
 $2,497
a.Third-party interest paid, net of capitalized interest, was $500 million in 2018, $565 million in 2017 and $743 million in 2016.
b.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
c.Refer to Note 9 for long-term portion.



NOTE 8.  DEBT
FCX’s debt at December 31, 2018,2021, included additions of $58$9 million ($9710 million at December 31, 2017)2020) for unamortized fair value adjustments, (primarily from the 2013 oil and gas acquisitions), and is net of reductions of $69$86 million ($85 million at December 31, 2017)2020) for unamortized net discounts and unamortized debt issuance costs. The components of debt follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Revolving credit facility$— $— 
Senior notes and debentures:  
Issued by FCX:
3.55% Senior Notes due 2022— 523 
3.875% Senior Notes due 2023995 994 
4.55% Senior Notes due 2024728 728 
5.00% Senior Notes due 2027594 593 
4.125% Senior Notes due 2028693 691 
4.375% Senior Notes due 2028643 642 
5.25% Senior Notes due 2029593 593 
4.25% Senior Notes due 2030593 592 
4.625% Senior Notes due 2030841 840 
5.40% Senior Notes due 2034742 742 
5.450% Senior Notes due 20431,846 1,845 
Issued by FMC:
71/8% Debentures due 2027
115 115 
9½% Senior Notes due 2031123 124 
61/8% Senior Notes due 2034
117 117 
PT-FI Term Loan432 — 
Cerro Verde Term Loan325 523 
Other70 49 
Total debt9,450 9,711 
Less current portion of debt(372)(34)
Long-term debt$9,078 $9,677 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Revolving credit facility$
 $
Cerro Verde credit facility1,023
 1,269
Senior notes and debentures:   
Issued by FCX:   
2.375% Senior Notes due 2018
 1,408
3.100% Senior Notes due 2020999
 997
4.00% Senior Notes due 2021597
 596
6.75% Senior Notes due 2022
 427
3.55% Senior Notes due 20221,886
 1,884
67/8% Senior Notes due 2023
768
 776
3.875% Senior Notes due 20231,915
 1,914
4.55% Senior Notes due 2024845
 845
5.40% Senior Notes due 2034741
 740
5.450% Senior Notes due 20431,843
 1,842
Issued by FMC:   
71/8% Debentures due 2027
115
 115
9½% Senior Notes due 2031126
 127
61/8% Senior Notes due 2034
117
 116
Issued by Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC (FM O&G LLC):   
67/8% Senior Notes due 2023

 54
Other166
 119
Total debt11,141
 13,229
Less current portion of debt(17) (1,414)
Long-term debt$11,124
 $11,815


Revolving Credit Facility. At December 31, 2018, there were2021, FCX had no borrowings outstanding and $13$8 million in letters of credit issued under FCX’sits revolving credit facility, resulting in availability of approximately $3.5 billion, of which approximately $1.5 billion could be used for additional letters of credit.

In April 2018, FCX, PT-FI and FM O&G LLC entered into a new $3.5 billion, five-year, unsecured Availability under FCX’s revolving credit facility which replacedconsists of $3.28 billion maturing April 2024 and $220 million maturing April 2023. For PT-FI, $500 million of FCX’s prior revolving credit facility (scheduled to mature on May 31, 2019). The new revolving credit facility is available until April 20, 2023, with $500 million available to PT-FI, and up to $1.5 billion available in letters of credit, and has a substantially similar structure and terms as the prior revolving credit facility. Interest on loans made under the new revolving credit facility is, at the option of FCX, determined based on the adjusted London Interbank Offered rate (LIBOR) or the alternate base rate (each as defined in the new revolving credit facility) plus a spread to be determined by reference to FCX’s credit ratings.available.


Cerro Verde Credit Facility. In March 2014, Cerro Verde entered into a five-year, $1.8 billion senior unsecured credit facility that is nonrecourse to FCX and the other shareholders of Cerro Verde. In June 2017, Cerro Verde’s credit facility was amended (balance outstanding at the time of amendment was $1.275 billion) to increase the commitment by $225 million to $1.5 billion, to modify the amortization schedule and to extend the maturity date to June 19, 2022. The amended credit facility amortizes in four installments, with $225 million due on December 31, 2020 (of which $5 million was prepaid during 2018 and $220 million was prepaid during 2017), $225 million due on June 30, 2021 (which was fully prepaid during 2018), $525 million due on December 31, 2021 (of which $20 million was prepaid during 2018), and the remaining balance due on the maturity date of June 19, 2022. All other terms, including the interest rates, remain the same. Interest under the term loan is based on LIBOR plus a spread based on Cerro Verde’s total net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio as defined in the agreement. The interest rate on Cerro Verde’s credit facility was 4.42 percent at December 31, 2018.


Cerro Verde Shareholder Loans. In December 2014, Cerro Verde entered into loan agreements with three of its shareholders for borrowings up to $800 million. In June 2017, Cerro Verde used the proceeds from its amended credit facility plus available cash to repay the balance of its outstanding shareholder loans. The remaining availability for borrowings under these agreements totals $200 million.

Senior Notes issued by FCX. In December 2016, FCX completed an exchange offer and consent solicitation associated with FM O&G LLC senior notes. Holders representing 89 percent of the outstanding FM O&G LLC senior notes tendered their notes and received new FCX senior notes. Each series of newly issued FCX senior notes have an interest rate that is identical to the interest rate of the applicable series of FM O&G LLC senior notes. The newly issued FCX senior notes are senior unsecured obligations of FCX and rank equally in right of payment with all other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of FCX. A summary of the tenders follows:
 Principal Amount Outstanding Principal Amount Tendered Book Value of New FCX Senior Notes
6.125% Senior Notes due 2019$237
 $179
 $186
6½% Senior Notes due 2020617
 552
 583
6.625% Senior Notes due 2021261
 228
 242
6.75% Senior Notes due 2022449
 404
 432
67/8% Senior Notes due 2023
778
 728
 785
 $2,342
 $2,091
 $2,228

The principal amounts were increased by $151 million to reflect the remaining unamortized acquisition-date fair market value adjustments associated with the 2013 oil and gas acquisitions. In addition, FCX paid $14 million in cash consideration for FM O&G LLC’s senior notes that were tendered, which reduced the book value of the new FCX senior notes. All of these senior notes, except the 6.75% Senior Notes due 2022 and the 67/8% Senior Notes due 2023, were redeemed during 2017 and the 6.75% Senior Notes due 2022 were redeemed during 2018 (refer to Early Extinguishment and Exchanges of Debt in this note). The 67/8% Senior Notes due 2023 are redeemable in whole or in part, at the option of FCX, at a make-whole redemption price prior to February 15, 2020, and at a specified redemption price thereafter. As of December 31, 2018, the book value of these senior notes totaled $768 million, which reflects the remaining unamortized acquisition-date fair market value adjustments ($46 million) and the cash consideration ($6 million) that are being amortized over the term of these senior notes and recorded as a net reduction of interest expense.

In November 2014, FCX sold $750 million of 2.30% Senior Notes due 2017 (which matured and were repaid in 2017), $600 million of 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021, $850 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024 and $800 million of 5.40% Senior Notes due 2034 for total net proceeds of $2.97 billion.

In March 2013, in connection with the financing of the 2013 oil and gas acquisitions, FCX issued $6.5 billion of unsecured senior notes in four tranches. FCX sold $1.5 billion of 2.375% Senior Notes due March 2018 (which matured and were repaid in 2018), $1.0 billion of 3.100% Senior Notes due March 2020, $2.0 billion of 3.875% Senior Notes due March 2023 and $2.0 billion of 5.450% Senior Notes due March 2043 for total net proceeds of $6.4 billion.

In February 2012, FCX sold $500 million of 2.15% Senior Notes due 2017 (which matured and were repaid in 2017) and $2.0 billion of 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022 for total net proceeds of $2.47 billion.

The 3.100% Senior Notes due 2020 and 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021 are redeemable in whole or in part, at the option of FCX, at a make-whole redemption price. The senior notes listed below are redeemable in whole or in part, at the option of FCX, at a make-whole redemption price prior to the dates stated below, and beginning on the dates stated below at 100 percent of principal.
Debt InstrumentDate
3.55% Senior Notes due 2022December 1, 2021
3.875% Senior Notes due 2023December 15, 2022
4.55% Senior Notes due 2024August 14, 2024
5.40% Senior Notes due 2034May 14, 2034
5.450% Senior Notes due 2043September 15, 2042

These senior notes rank equally with FCX’s other existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

Early Extinguishment and Exchanges of Debt. During 2018, FCX redeemed in full certain senior notes, and holders received the principal amounts together with the redemption premiums and accrued and unpaid interest up to the redemption date. A summary of these redemptions follows:
          
 Principal Amount Net Adjustments Book Value Redemption Value Gain
FCX 6.75% Senior Notes due 2022$404
 $22
 $426
 $418
 $8
FM O&G LLC 67/8% Senior Notes due 2023
50
 4
 54
 52
 2
 $454
 $26
 $480
 $470
 $10

Partially offsetting the $10 million gain were losses of $3 million, primarily associated with Cerro Verde’s prepayments in 2018 and entering into the new revolving credit facility in April 2018.

During 2017, FCX redeemed in full or purchased in open-market transactions certain senior notes. A summary of these debt extinguishments follows:
 Principal Amount Net Adjustments Book Value Redemption Value Gain
2.375% Senior Notes due 2018$74
 $
 $74
 $74
 $
FCX 6.125% Senior Notes due 2019179
 5
 184
 182
 2
FM O&G LLC 6.125% Senior Notes due 201958
 2
 60
 59
 1
FCX 6½% Senior Notes due 2020552
 23
 575
 562
 13
FM O&G LLC 6½% Senior Notes due 202065
 3
 68
 66
 2
FCX 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021228
 12
 240
 234
 6
FM O&G LLC 6.625% Senior Notes due 202133
 2
 35
 34
 1
FM O&G LLC 6.750% Senior Notes due 202245
 2
 47
 46
 1
 $1,234
 $49
 $1,283
 $1,257
 $26

Partially offsetting the $26 million gain was a net loss of $5 million, primarily associated with the modification of Cerro Verde’s credit facility in June 2017 and Cerro Verde’s prepayment in December 2017.

During 2016, FCX redeemed certain senior notes in exchange for its common stock (refer to Note 10 for further discussion) and purchased certain senior notes in open-market transactions. A summary of these transactions follows:
 Principal Amount Net Adjustments Book Value Redemption Value Gain
          
2.30% Senior Notes due 2017$20
 $
 $20
 $20
 $
2.375% Senior Notes due 201818
 
 18
 18
 
3.55% Senior Notes due 2022108
 (1) 107
 96
 11
3.875% Senior Notes due 202377
 
 77
 68
 9
5.40% Senior Notes due 203450
 (1) 49
 41
 8
5.450% Senior Notes due 2043134
 (2) 132
 106
 26
 $407
 $(4) $403
 $349
 $54

Partially offsetting the $54 million gain was $28 million in losses, primarily related to deferred debt issuance costs for an unsecured bank term loan that was repaid and costs associated with the December 2016 senior note exchange offer and consent solicitation.

Guarantees. Refer to Note 17 for a discussion of FCX’s senior notes guaranteed by FM O&G LLC.


Restrictive Covenants.FCX’s revolving credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants and representations, and also contains a number of negative covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of FCX’s subsidiaries that are not borrowers or guarantors to incur additional indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) and FCX’s or its subsidiaries’ abilities to: create liens on assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; engage in mergers, liquidations and dissolutions; and sell assets. FCX’s revolving credit facility also contains financial ratios governing maximum total leverage and minimum interest expense coverage. At December 31, 2021, FCX was in compliance with its revolving credit facility covenants.

In December 2021, Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC, a 100-percent-owned subsidiary of FCX Oil & Gas LLC (FM O&G) and indirect subsidiary of FCX, was released as co-borrower from FCX’s leverage ratio (ratiorevolving credit facility and released as guarantor from all of total debtthe indentures relating to consolidated EBITDA,FCX’s outstanding senior notes.

Interest on loans made under the revolving credit facility is, at the option of FCX, determined based on the adjusted London Interbank Offered rate (LIBOR) or the alternate base rate (each as defined in the revolving credit agreement) cannot exceed 3.75x,facility) plus a spread to be determined by reference to FCX’s credit ratings.

Certain of FCX’s debt agreements, including its revolving credit facility, reference LIBOR which is being phased out and replaced with alternative reference rates. FCX does not expect the transition from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.


129

Senior Notes. In December 2021, FCX redeemed all of its outstanding $524 million aggregate principal amount of 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022, at a redemption price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

In July 2020, FCX completed the sale of $650 million of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2028 and $850 million of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2030 for proceeds, net of underwriting fees, totaling $1.485 billion. Interest on these senior notes is payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year. FCX used $1.4 billion of the net proceeds from this offering to purchase a portion of its outstanding 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022, 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023 and 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024, and the minimumpayment of accrued and unpaid interest, expense coverage ratio (ratiopremiums, fees and expenses in connection with these transactions. The remaining net proceeds from this offering were used for general corporate purposes.

In March 2020, FCX completed the sale of consolidated EBITDA$700 million of 4.125% Senior Notes due 2028 and $600 million of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2030 for proceeds, net of underwriting fees, totaling $1.285 billion. Interest on these senior notes is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. FCX used a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to consolidated cashpurchase a portion of its 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and its 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022 and the payment of accrued and unpaid interest, expense, as definedpremiums, fees and expenses in connection with these transactions. In April 2020, FCX used the credit agreement) is 2.25x. remaining net proceeds to fund the make-whole redemption of all of its remaining 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and the payment of accrued and unpaid interest, premiums, fees and expenses in connection with the transaction.

Listed below are the FCX senior notes, redeemed in full or purchased during the three-year period ended December 31, 2021.

Principal AmountNet AdjustmentsBook ValueRedemption/Tender ValueLoss
Year Ended December 31, 2021
FCX 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022$524 $— $524 $524 $— 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
FCX 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021$195 $(1)$194 $205 $11 
FCX 3.55% Senior Notes due 20221,356 (6)1,350 1,391 41 
FCX 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023927 (4)923 964 41 
FCX 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024120 (1)119 126 
Total$2,598 $(12)$2,586 $2,686 $100 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
FCX 3.100% Senior Notes due 2020$1,000 $(2)$998 $1,003 $
FCX 6.875% Senior Notes due 2023728 34 762 768 
FCX 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021405 (2)403 418 15 
FCX 3.55% Senior Notes due 202212 — 12 12 — 
Total$2,145 $30 $2,175 $2,201 $26 

The senior notes listed below are redeemable in whole or in part, at the option of FCX, at a make-whole redemption price prior to the dates stated below, at specified redemption prices beginning on the dates stated below, and at 100 percent of principal two years before maturity.

Debt InstrumentDate
5.00% Senior Notes due 2027September 1, 2022
4.125% Senior Notes due 2028March 1, 2023
4.375% Senior Notes due 2028August 1, 2023
5.25% Senior Notes due 2029September 1, 2024
4.25% Senior Notes due 2030March 1, 2025
4.625% Senior Notes due 2030August 1, 2025


130

The senior notes listed below are redeemable in whole or in part, at the option of FCX, at a make-whole redemption price prior to the dates stated below, and beginning on the dates stated below at 100 percent of principal.
Debt InstrumentDate
3.875% Senior Notes due 2023December 15, 2022
4.55% Senior Notes due 2024August 14, 2024
5.40% Senior Notes due 2034May 14, 2034
5.450% Senior Notes due 2043September 15, 2042

FCX’s senior notes contain limitations on liens. liens and rank equally with FCX’s other existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

PT-FI Credit Facility. In July 2021, PT-FI entered into a $1.0 billion, five-year, unsecured credit facility (consisting of a $667 million term loan and a $333 million revolving credit facility) to fund project costs in connection with the PT Smelting expansion and construction of a precious metals refinery (PMR), and for PT-FI’s general corporate purposes. The term loan allows for borrowings up to $667 million within the first three years, and then amortizes in four installments, with 15 percent of the outstanding balance due in January 2025, 15 percent due in July 2025, 35 percent due in January 2026 and the remaining 35 percent due in July 2026. The $333 million revolving credit facility is available for drawings until June 2026. Amounts drawn under the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.875% or 2.125%, as defined by the agreement.

PT-FI’s credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants and representations and also contains standard covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of PT-FI to incur additional indebtedness; create liens on assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; sell assets; and modify or amend the shareholders agreement or related governance structure. The credit facility also contains financial ratios governing maximum total leverage and minimum interest expense coverage and certain environmental and social compliance requirements.At December 31, 2018, FCX2021, PT-FI was in compliance with allits credit facility covenants.

As of December 31, 2021, $443 million ($432 million net of debt issuance costs) was drawn under the PT-FI Term Loan and no amounts were drawn under the revolving credit facility.

Cerro Verde Term Loan. Repayments of the Cerro Verde Term Loan totaled $200 million in 2021, $305 million in 2020 and $200 million in 2019, with the remaining balance of $325 million due on the maturity date of June 19, 2022. Interest under the Term Loan is based on LIBOR plus a spread based on Cerro Verde’s total net debt to EBITDA ratio as defined in the agreement. The interest rate on Cerro Verde’s Term Loan was 2.00 percent at December 31, 2021.

Cerro Verde Shareholder Loans. In December 2014, Cerro Verde entered into loan agreements with three of its covenants.shareholders for borrowings up to $800 million due June 2024. No amounts were outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and availability under these agreements totals $200 million at December 31, 2021.


Maturities.  Maturities of debt instruments based on the principal amounts and terms outstanding at December 31, 2018,2021, total $17$372 million in 2019, $1.0 billion in 2020, $1.1 billion in 2021, $2.4 billion in 2022, $2.7 billion$997 million in 2023, $735 million in 2024, $137 million in 2025, $314 million in 2026 and $3.9$7.0 billion thereafter.



131

NOTE 9.  OTHER LIABILITIES, INCLUDING EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The components of other liabilities follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Pension, postretirement, postemployment and other employment benefitsa
$845 $1,213 
Leasesb
281 190 
Provision for tax positions232 261 
Litigation accruals131 110 
Indemnification of PT Inalumb
78 42 
Cerro Verde royalty disputec
— 376 
Other116 77 
Total other liabilities$1,683 $2,269 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Pension, postretirement, postemployment and other employment benefitsa
$1,174
 $1,154
Cerro Verde royalty dispute631
 368
Provision for tax positions230
 291
Other195
 199
Total other liabilities$2,230
 $2,012
a.Refer to Note 7 for current portion.
a.
Refer to Note 7 for current portion.
b.Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.
c.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
Pension Plans.  Following is a discussion of FCX’s pension plans.


FMC Plans. FMC has U.S. trusteed, non-contributory pension plans covering substantially all of itssome U.S. employees and some employees of its international subsidiaries hired before 2007. The applicable FMC plan design determines the manner in which benefits are calculated for any particular group of employees. Benefits are calculated based on final average monthly compensation and years of service or based on a fixed amount for each year of service. Non-bargained FMC employees hired after December 31, 2006, are not eligible to participate in the FMC U.S. pension plan. See below for discussion of a 2020 plan amendment.


FCX’s funding policy for these plans provides that contributions to pension trusts shall be at least equal to the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, for U.S. plans; or, in the case of international plans, the minimum legal requirements that may be applicable in the various countries. Additional contributions also may be made from time to time.


FCX’s policy for determining asset-mix targetsprimary investment objectives for the FMC plan assets held in a master trust (Master Trust) includesare to maintain funds sufficient to pay all benefit and expense obligations when due, minimize the periodic development of asset allocation studies and reviewvolatility of the liabilitiesplan’s funded status to determine expected long-term ratesthe extent practical, and to maintain prudent levels of return and expected risk for various investment portfolios. FCX’s retirement plan administration and investment committee considers these studies inconsistent with the formal establishment of asset-mix targets defined in theplan’s investment policy. FCX’s investmentHistorically, FMC plan assets have been invested in a balanced portfolio of return-seeking assets and risk-mitigating assets, with the allocation between these portfolios dependent on the funded status of the plan. During 2021, FCX reallocated essentially all of the portfolio to risk-mitigating assets with the objective emphasizes diversification through both theof minimizing funded-status volatility. The risk-mitigating assets are allocated among multiple fixed income managers. The current target allocation of the Master Trust assets among various asset classes and the selection of investment managers whose various styles are fundamentally complementary to one another and serve to achieve satisfactory rates of return. Diversification, by asset class and by investment manager,portfolio is FCX’s principal means of reducing volatility and exercising prudent investment judgment. FCX’s present target asset allocation approximates 41 percent equity investments (primarily global equities), 51 percentlong-duration credit (50 percent); long-duration U.S. government/credit (20 percent); core fixed income (primarily long-term treasury STRIPS or “separate trading or registered interest and principal securities”(16 percent); long-term U.S. treasury/agency bonds; global fixed income securities; long-term, high-credit quality corporate bonds; high-yieldTreasury Separate Trading of Registered Interest and emerging markets fixed income securities;Principal Securities (STRIPS) (13 percent); and fixed income debt securities) and 8 percent alternative investments (private real estate, real estate investment trusts and private equity)cash equivalents (1 percent).



The expected rate of return on plan assets is evaluated at least annually, taking into consideration asset allocation, historical and expected future performance on the types of assets held in the Master Trust, and the current economic environment. Based on these factors, FCX expects the pension assets will earn an average of 6.53.00 percent per annum beginning January 1, 2019. The 6.5 percent estimation2022, which was based on a passive return on a compound basis of 6.0 percent and a premium for active management of 0.5 percent reflecting the target asset allocation and current investment array.long-term capital market return expectations.


For estimation purposes, FCX assumes the long-term asset mix for these plans generally will be consistent with the current mix. Changes in the asset mix could impact the amount of recorded pension costs, the funded status of the plans and the need for future cash contributions. A lower-than-expected return on assets also would decrease plan assets and increase the amount of recorded pension costs in future years. When calculating the expected return on plan assets, FCX uses the market value of assets.


132

Among the assumptions used to estimate the pension benefit obligation is a discount rate used to calculate the present value of expected future benefit payments for service to date. The discount rate assumption for FCX’s U.S. plans is designed to reflect yields on high-quality, fixed-income investments for a given duration. The determination of the discount rate for these plans is based on expected future benefit payments for service to date together with the Mercer Pension DiscountYield Curve - Above Mean Yield.Mean. The Mercer Pension DiscountYield Curve - Above Mean Yield is constructed from the bonds in the Mercer Pension Discount Curve that have a yield higher than the regression mean yield curve. The Mercer Pension DiscountYield Curve - Above Mean consists of spot (i.e., zero coupon) interest rates at one-half-year increments for each of the next 30 years and is developed based on pricing and yield information for high-quality corporate bonds. Changes in the discount rate are reflected in FCX’s benefit obligation and, therefore, in future pension costs.


SERP Plan. FCX has an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for its chief executive officer. The SERP provides for retirement benefits payable in the form of a joint and survivor annuity, life annuity or an equivalent lump sum. The participant has elected to receive an equivalent lump sum which is determined on January 1 of the year in which the participant completed 25 years of credited service.payment. The annuitypayment will equal a percentage of the participant’s highest average compensation for any consecutive three-year period during the five years immediately preceding the completion of 25 years of credited service. The SERP benefit will be reduced by the value of all benefits from current and former retirement plans (qualified and nonqualified) sponsored by FCX, by FM Services Company, FCX’s wholly owned subsidiary, or by any predecessor employer (including FCX’s former parent company), except for benefits produced by accounts funded exclusively by deductions from the participant’s pay.


PT-FI Plan. PT-FI has a defined benefit pension plan denominated in IndonesianIndonesia rupiah covering substantially all of its IndonesianIndonesia national employees. PT-FI funds the plan and invests the assets in accordance with IndonesianIndonesia pension guidelines. The pension obligation was valued at an exchange rate of 14,40914,198 rupiah to one U.S. dollar on December 31, 2018,2021, and 13,48014,034 rupiah to one U.S. dollar on December 31, 2017. Indonesian2020. Indonesia labor laws require that companies provide a minimum level of benefitsseverance to employees upon employment termination based on the reason for termination and the employee’s years of service. PT-FI’s pension benefit obligation includes benefits related todetermined in accordance with this law. PT-FI’s expected rate of return on plan assets is evaluated at least annually, taking into consideration its long-range estimated return for the plan based on the asset mix. Based on these factors, PT-FI expects its pension assets will earn an average of 7.757.00 percent per annum beginning January 1, 2019.2022. The discount rate assumption for PT-FI’s plan is based on the Mercer Indonesian zero coupon bond yield curve derived from the IndonesianIndonesia Government Security Yield Curve. Changes in the discount rate are reflected in PT-FI’s benefit obligation and, therefore, in future pension costs.


Plan Information. FCX uses a measurement date of December 31 for its plans. Information for thosequalified and non-qualified plans where the projected benefit obligations and the accumulated benefit obligations exceed the fair value of plan assets follows:
 December 31,
 20212020
Projected benefit obligation$2,476 $2,666 
Accumulated benefit obligation2,476 2,664 
Fair value of plan assets1,988 1,884 

133

 December 31,
 2018 2017
Projected benefit obligation$2,177
 $2,287
Accumulated benefit obligation2,048
 2,163
Fair value of plan assets1,373
 1,521


Information on the qualified and non-qualified FCX (FMC and SERP plans) and PT-FI plans as of December 31 follows:
FCXPT-FI
 2021202020212020
Change in benefit obligation:    
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,722 $2,576 $238 $217 
Service cost12 37 13 11 
Interest cost66 77 14 14 
Actuarial (gains) losses(117)308 (3)12 
Plan amendments— — (2)— 
Foreign exchange (gains) losses(1)(3)(2)
Curtailment— (154)— — 
Benefits and administrative expenses paid(129)(123)(20)(14)
Benefit obligation at end of year2,553 2,722 237 238 
Change in plan assets:    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year1,946 1,677 251 254 
Actual return on plan assets150 272 13 
Employer contributionsa
105 119 
Foreign exchange (losses) gains(1)(3)(4)
Benefits and administrative expenses paid(129)(123)(20)(14)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year2,071 1,946 240 251 
Funded status$(482)$(776)$$13 
Accumulated benefit obligation$2,551 $2,719 $194 $194 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:    
Discount rate2.85 %2.50 %6.50 %6.25 %
Rate of compensation increase— %— %4.00 %4.00 %
Balance sheet classification of funded status:    
Other assets$$$$13 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(4)(4)— — 
Other liabilities(484)(779)— — 
Total$(482)$(776)$$13 
 FCX PT-FI
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Change in benefit obligation:       
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$2,343
 $2,135
 $240
 $374
Service cost44
 44
 13
 20
Interest cost84
 91
 14
 23
Actuarial (gains) losses(124) 188
 (19) (61)
Plan amendments4
 
 
 
Foreign exchange (gains) losses(1) 3
 (15) (2)
Curtailmenta

 
 
 (62)
Benefits and administrative expenses paid(120) (118) (13) (52)
Benefit obligation at end of year2,230
 2,343
 220
 240
        
Change in plan assets:       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year1,588
 1,329
��269
 284
Actual return on plan assets(104) 230
 (5) 11
Employer contributionsb
70
 145
 4
 28
Foreign exchange (losses) gains(1) 2
 (17) (2)
Benefits and administrative expenses paid

(120) (118) (13) (52)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year1,433
 1,588
 238
 269
Funded status$(797) $(755) $18
 $29
        
Accumulated benefit obligation$2,101
 $2,218
 $181
 $194
        
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:       
Discount rate4.40% 3.70% 8.25% 6.75%
Rate of compensation increase3.25% 3.25% 4.00% 4.00%
        
Balance sheet classification of funded status:       
Other assets$7
 $11
 $18
 $29
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(4) (4) 
 
Other liabilities(800) (762) 
 
Total$(797) $(755) $18
 $29
a.Resulted from the 2017 PT-FI reductions in workforce (refer to Restructuring Charges in this note for further discussion).
b.
Employer contributions for 2019 are expected to approximate $74 million for the FCX plans and $2 million for the PT-FI plan (based on a December 31, 2018, exchange rate of 14,409 Indonesian rupiah to one U.S. dollar).

a.Employer contributions for 2022 are currently expected to approximate $112 million for the FCX plans and $1 million for the PT-FI plan (based on a December 31, 2021, exchange rate of 14,198 Indonesia rupiah to one U.S. dollar), and are subject to change.

In August 2020, the FMC Retirement Plan, the largest FMC plan, was amended such that, effective September 1, 2020, participants no longer accrue any additional benefits. As a result, FCX remeasured its pension assets and benefit obligation as of July 31, 2020. The discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets used for the July 31, 2020, remeasurement were 2.40 percent and 6.25 percent, respectively. The remeasurement and curtailment resulted in the projected benefit obligation increasing by $184 million and plan assets increasing by $103 million. In addition, FCX recognized a curtailment loss of $4 million in 2020.

During 2018,2021, the actuarial gain of $124$117 million for the FCX pension plans primarily resulted from the increase in the discount rate from 3.702.50 percent to 4.402.85 percent($205 million), partially offset by new census data incorporated into the valuations ($33 million) and updated demographic assumptions ($49 million) mainly resulting from mortality updates. . During 2017,2020, the actuarial loss of $188$308 million for the FCX pension plans primarily resulted from the decrease in the discount rate from 4.403.40 percent to 3.702.50 percent,and the update to the actuarial basis for lump sum conversions.

During 2018, the actuarial gain of $19 million for the PT-FI pension plan primarily resulted from the increase in the discount rate from 6.75 percent to 8.25 percent and demographic experience gains. During 2017, the actuarial gain of $61 million resulted primarily because of the workforce reduction during 2017, experience gains and a decline in the rate of compensation increase, partially offset by the decrease in the discount rate from 8.25 percentFMC Retirement Plan amendment to 6.75 percent.discontinue additional benefits.




134

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost and the components of net periodic benefit cost for FCX’s pension plans for the years ended December 31 follow:
 202120202019
Weighted-average assumptions:a
   
Discount rate2.50 %2.98 %4.40 %
Expected return on plan assets5.25 %6.25 %6.50 %
Rate of compensation increase— %3.25 %3.25 %
Service cost$12 $37 $42 
Interest cost66 77 95 
Expected return on plan assets(98)(105)(90)
Amortization of net actuarial losses25 45 48 
Curtailment loss— — 
Net periodic benefit cost$$58 $95 
 2018 2017 2016
Weighted-average assumptions:a
     
Discount rate3.70% 4.40% 4.60%
Expected return on plan assets6.50% 7.00% 7.25%
Rate of compensation increase3.25% 3.25% 3.25%
      
Service cost$44
 $44
 $27
Interest cost84
 91
 93
Expected return on plan assets(101) (93) (96)
Amortization of net actuarial losses49
 49
 42
Net periodic benefit cost$76
 $91
 $66
a.The assumptions shown relate only to the FMC plans.

a.The assumptions shown relate only to the FMC Retirement Plan.

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost and the components of net periodic benefit cost for PT-FI’s pension plan for the years ended December 31 follow:
 202120202019
Weighted-average assumptions:   
Discount rate6.25 %7.25 %8.25 %
Expected return on plan assets7.75 %7.75 %8.25 %
Rate of compensation increase4.00 %4.00 %4.00 %
Service cost$13 $11 $12 
Interest cost14 14 17 
Expected return on plan assets(19)(19)(17)
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net actuarial gains(1)(3)(1)
Net periodic benefit cost$$$12 
 2018 2017 2016
Weighted-average assumptions:     
Discount rate6.75% 8.25% 9.00%
Expected return on plan assets6.75% 7.75% 7.75%
Rate of compensation increase4.00% 8.00% 9.40%
      
Service cost$13
 $20
 $27
Interest cost14
 23
 29
Expected return on plan assets(19) (21) (17)
Amortization of prior service cost2
 2
 3
Amortization of net actuarial (gain) loss(1) 
 5
Curtailment loss
 4
 
Net periodic benefit cost$9
 $28
 $47


The service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is included in operating income, and the other components are included in other (expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are the following amounts that have not been recognized in net periodic pension cost as of December 31:
20212020
 Before TaxesAfter Taxes and Noncontrolling InterestsBefore TaxesAfter Taxes and Noncontrolling Interests
Net actuarial losses$488 $369 $673 $558 
Prior service costs— 
$490 $369 $679 $559 
 2018 2017
 Before Taxes After Taxes and Noncontrolling Interests Before Taxes After Taxes and Noncontrolling Interests
Net actuarial loss$659
 $539
 $620
 $412
Prior service costs13
 8
 10
 6
 $672
 $547
 $630
 $418


Plan assets are classified within a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), then to prices derived using significant observable inputs (Level 2) and the lowest priority to prices derived using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).



135

A summary of the fair value for pension plan assets, including those measured at net asset value (NAV) as a practical expedient, associated with the FCX plans follows:
 Fair Value at December 31, 2021
 TotalNAVLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Commingled/collective funds:    
    Fixed income securities$522 $522 $— $— $— 
    Real estate property72 72 — — — 
    Short-term investments38 38 — — — 
Fixed income:    
Corporate bonds911 — — 911 — 
Government bonds437 — — 437 — 
Private equity investments11 11 — — — 
Other investments74 — 73 — 
Total investments2,065 $643 $$1,421 $— 
Cash and receivables18 
Payables(12)
Total pension plan net assets$2,071 
 Fair Value at December 31, 2018
 Total NAV Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Commingled/collective funds:         
    Global equity$291
 $291
 $
 $
 $
    Fixed income securities144
 144
 
 
 
    Global fixed income securities108
 108
 
 
 
    Emerging markets equity71
 71
 
 
 
    Real estate property55
 55
 
 
 
    U.S. small-cap equity54
 54
 
 
 
    International small-cap equity47
 47
 
 
 
    U.S. real estate securities41
 41
 
 
 
    Short-term investments15
 15
 
 
 
Fixed income:         
Government bonds224
 
 
 224
 
Corporate bonds211
 
 
 211
 
Global large-cap equity securities94
 
 94
 
 
Private equity investments15
 15
 
 
 
Other investments61
 
 16
 45
 
Total investments1,431
 $841
 $110
 $480
 $
          
Cash and receivables32
        
Payables(30)        
Total pension plan net assets$1,433
        

 Fair Value at December 31, 2020
 TotalNAVLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Commingled/collective funds:      
Global equity$527 $527 $— $— $— 
Fixed income securities404 404 — — — 
International small-cap equity76 76 — — — 
Real estate property59 59 — — — 
U.S. real estate securities51 51 — — — 
Short-term investments51 51 — — — 
U.S. small-cap equity25 25 — — — 
Fixed income:
Corporate bonds381 — — 381 — 
Government bonds181 — — 181 — 
Global large-cap equity securities109 — 109 — — 
Private equity investments10 10 — — — 
Other investments55 — 54 — 
Total investments1,929 $1,203 $110 $616 $— 
Cash and receivables100 
Payables(83)
Total pension plan net assets$1,946 
 Fair Value at December 31, 2017
 Total NAV Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Commingled/collective funds:            
Global equity$404
 $404
 $
 $
 $
Fixed income securities154
 154
 
 
 
Global fixed income securities115
 115
 
 
 
Emerging markets equity87
 87
 
 
 
International small-cap equity72
 72
 
 
 
U.S. small-cap equity67
 67
 
 
 
Real estate property50
 50
 
 
 
U.S. real estate securities45
 45
 
 
 
Short-term investments12
 12
 
 
 
Fixed income:         
Government bonds208
 
 
 208
 
Corporate bonds168
 
 
 168
 
Global large-cap equity securities119
 
 119
 
 
Private equity investments20
 20
 
 
 
Other investments62
 
 19
 43
 
Total investments1,583
 $1,026
 $138
 $419
 $
          
Cash and receivables21
        
Payables(16)        
Total pension plan net assets$1,588
        


Following is a description of the pension plan asset categories and the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. There have been no changes to the techniques used to measure fair value.



Commingled/collective funds are managed by several fund managers and are valued at the NAV per unit of the fund. For most of these funds, the majority of the underlying assets are actively traded securities. These funds (except the real estate property fund) primarily require up to a 60-daytwo-business-day notice for redemptions. The real estate property fund is valued at NAV using information from independent appraisal firms, who have knowledge and expertise about the current market values of real property in the same vicinity as the investments. Redemptions of the real estate property fund are allowed once per quarter (with a 30-calendar-day notice), subject to available cash.


136

Fixed income investments include government and corporate bonds held directly by the Master Trust. Fixed income securities are valued using a bid-evaluation price or a mid-evaluation price and, as such, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. A bid-evaluation price is an estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. A mid-evaluation price is the average of the estimated price at which a dealer would sell a security and the estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. These evaluations are based on quoted prices, if available, or models that use observable inputs.


Common stocks included in global large-cap equity securities and preferred stocks included in other investments are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.


Private equity investments are valued at NAV using information from general partners and have inherent restrictions on redemptions that may affect the ability to sell the investments at their NAV in the near term.


A summary of the fair value hierarchy for pension plan assets associated with the PT-FI plan follows:
 Fair Value at December 31, 2021
 TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Government bonds$114 $114 $— $— 
Common stocks80 80 — — 
Mutual funds18 18 — — 
Total investments212 $212 $— $— 
Cash and receivablesa
29 
Payables(1)
Total pension plan net assets$240 
 Fair Value at December 31, 2018
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Government bonds$72
 $72
 $
 $
Common stocks72
 72
 
 
Mutual funds20
 20
 
 
Total investments164
 $164
 $
 $
        
Cash and receivablesa
75
      
Payables(1)      
Total pension plan net assets$238
      


 Fair Value at December 31, 2020
 TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Government bonds$117 $117 $— $— 
Common stocks77 77 — — 
Mutual funds18 18 — — 
Total investments212 $212 $— $— 
Cash and receivablesa
41 
Payables(2)
Total pension plan net assets$251 
a.Cash consists primarily of short-term time deposits.
 Fair Value at December 31, 2017
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Government bonds$81
 $81
 $
 $
Common stocks78
 78
 
 
Mutual funds16
 16
 
 
Total investments175
 $175
 $
 $
        
Cash and receivablesa
94
      
Total pension plan net assets$269
      
a.Cash consists primarily of short-term time deposits.


Following is a description of the valuation techniques used for pension plan assets measured at fair value associated with the PT-FI plan. There have been no changes to the techniques used to measure fair value.


CommonGovernment bonds, common stocks government bonds and mutual funds are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.


The techniques described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of NRV or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while FCX believes its valuation techniques are appropriate and consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of different techniques or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.



137

The expected benefit payments for FCX’s and PT-FI’s pension plans follow:
FCX
PT-FIa
2022$127 $17 
2023178 27 
2024130 30 
2025131 27 
2026132 30 
2027 through 2031653 146 
 FCX 
PT-FIa
2019$117
 $45
2020160
 11
2021123
 19
2022126
 22
2023128
 30
2024 through 2028664
 160
a.
Based on a December 31, 2018, exchange rate of 14,409 Indonesian rupiah to one U.S. dollar.

a.Based on a December 31, 2021, exchange rate of 14,198 Indonesia rupiah to one U.S. dollar.

Postretirement and Other Benefits.  FCX also provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain U.S. employees and, in some cases, employees of certain international subsidiaries. These postretirement benefits vary among plans, and many plans require contributions from retirees. The expected cost of providing such postretirement benefits is accrued during the years employees render service.


The benefit obligation (funded status) for the postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans consisted of a current portion of $13$7 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities) and a long-term portion of $115$57 million (included in other liabilities) at December 31, 2018,2021, and a current portion of $14$7 million and a long-term portion of $129$69 million at December 31, 2017. The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation for these plans, which was determined on the same basis as FCX’s pension plans, was 4.20 percent at December 31, 2018, and 3.50 percent at December 31, 2017. Expected benefit payments for these plans total $13 million for 2019, $13 million for 2020, $13 million for 2021, $12 million for 2022, $11 million for 2023 and $47 million for 2024 through 2028.2020.


The net periodic benefit cost charged to operations for FCX’s postretirement benefits (primarily for interest costs) totaled $5 million in 2018, $5 million in 2017 and $4 million in 2016. The discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost and the components of net periodic benefit cost for FCX’s postretirement benefits was 3.50 percent in 2018, 3.80 percent in 2017 and 4.10 percent in 2016. The medical-care trend rates assumed the first year trend rate was 7.75 percent at December 31, 2018, which declines over the next 15 years with an ultimate trend rate of 4.25 percent.

FCX has a number of postemployment plans covering severance, long-term disability income, continuation of health and life insurance coverage for disabled employees or other welfare benefits. The accumulated postemployment benefit obligation consisted of a current portion of $6$6 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities) and a long-term portion of $39$35 million (included in other liabilities) at December 31, 2018,2021, and a current portion of $5$6 million and a long-term portion of $38$42 million at December 31, 2017.2020.


FCX also sponsors a retirement savings plansplan for the majoritymost of its U.S. employees. The plans allowplan allows employees to contribute a portion of their pre-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. TheseThe savings plans are principallyplan is a qualified 401(k) plansplan for all U.S. salaried and non-bargained hourly employees. In these plans, participantsParticipants exercise control and direct the investment of their contributions and account balances among various investment options.options under the plan. FCX contributes to these plans at varying ratesthe plan and matches a percentage of employee pre-tax deferral contributions up to certain limits, which vary by plan.limits. For employees whose eligible compensation exceeds certain levels, FCX provides ana nonqualified unfunded defined contribution plan, which had a liability balance of $45$51 million at December 31, 2018,2021, and $46$49 million at December 31, 2017,2020, all of which was included in other liabilities.


The costs charged to operations for the employee savings plansplan totaled $75$95 million in 2018 (none2021, $40 million in 2020 and $85 million in 2019. The costs were lower in 2020, compared with 2021 and 2019, because of which was capitalized), $65 million in 2017 (nonea temporary suspension of which was capitalized) and $78 million in 2016 (of which $4 million was capitalized to oil and gas properties).FCX contributions implemented as part of FCX’s April 2020 revised operating plans. FCX contributions resumed on January 1, 2021. FCX has other employee benefit plans, certain of which are related to FCX’s financial results, which are recognized in operating costs.


Restructuring Charges. As a result
138


laws and regulations. As a result, PT-FI recorded charges in 2017 to production costs of $120 million, and selling, general and administrative costs of $5 million for employee severance and related costs, and a pension curtailment loss of $4 million in production costs.

In early 2016, FCX restructured its oil and gas business to reduce costs and in late 2016, FCX sold substantially all of its remaining oil and gas properties. As a result, FCX recorded charges of $85 million to selling, general and administrative expenses and $6 million to production costs for net restructuring-related costs in 2016.

NOTE 10.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
FCX’s authorized shares of capital stock total 3.05 billion shares, consisting of 3.0 billion shares of common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock.


Common Stock.  In November 2016, FCX completed a $1.5 billion registered at-the-market equity offering of common stock that was announced on July 27, 2016. FCX sold 116.5 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $12.87 per share, which generated gross proceeds of $1.5 billion (net proceeds of $1.48 billion after $15 million of commissions and expenses).

During 2016, FCX issued 48.1 million shares of its common stock (with a value of $540 million, excluding $5 million of commissions paid by FCX) in connection with the settlement of two drilling rig contracts. Also during 2016, FCX negotiated private exchange transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whereby 27.7 million shares of FCX’s common stock were issued (with an aggregate value of $311 million), in exchange for $369 million principal amount of FCX’s senior notes.

From January 1, 2016, through January 5, 2016, FCX sold 4.3 million shares of its common stock, which generated proceeds of $29 million (after $0.3 million of commissions and expenses). FCX used the proceeds to repay indebtedness.

Financial Policy.In February 2018,2021, FCX’s Board of Directors (the Board)(Board) adopted a financial policy for the allocation of cash flows aligned with FCX’s strategic objectives of maintaining a strong balance sheet and increasing cash returns to shareholders while advancing opportunities for future growth. The policy includes a base dividend and a performance-based payout framework, whereby up to 50 percent of available cash flows generated after planned capital spending and distributions to noncontrolling interests would be allocated to shareholder returns and the balance to debt reduction and investments in value enhancing growth projects, subject to FCX maintaining its net debt at a level not to exceed the net debt target of $3 billion to $4 billion (excluding project debt for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia).

In February 2021, the Board reinstated a cash dividend on FCX’s common stock with an annual rate(base dividend), and on November 1, 2021, the Board approved (i) a new share repurchase program authorizing repurchases of $0.20up to $3.0 billion of FCX common stock and (ii) a variable cash dividend on FCX’s common stock for 2022.

In fourth-quarter 2021, FCX acquired 12.7 million shares under the share repurchase program for a total cost of $488 million ($38.32 per share. share). Through February 15, 2022, FCX acquired 18.2 million shares of its common stock for a total cost of $710 million ($39.10 per share) and $2.3 billion remains available for repurchases.

On December 22, 2021, FCX declared dividends totaling $0.15 per share on its common stock, which was paid on February 1, 2022, to common stockholders of record as of January 14, 2022. This payment includes a $0.075 per share quarterly base cash dividend and a $0.075 per share quarterly variable cash dividend.

The declaration and payment of dividends (base or variable) and timing and amount of any share repurchases is at the discretion of theFCX’s Board and will depend onmanagement, respectively, and is subject to a number of factors, including maintaining FCX’s net debt target, capital availability, FCX’s financial results, cash requirements, futurebusiness prospects, global economic conditions, changes in laws, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by FCX’s Board or management, as applicable. FCX’s share repurchase program may be modified, increased, suspended or terminated at any time at the Board.Board’s discretion.


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. A summary of changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, follows:
Defined Benefit PlansTranslation AdjustmentTotal
Balance at January 1, 2019$(615)$10 $(605)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
(118)— (118)
Amounts reclassifiedc
47 — 47 
Balance at December 31, 2019(686)10 (676)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
47 — 47 
Amounts reclassifiedc
46 — 46 
Balance at December 31, 2020(593)10 (583)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
176 — 176 
Amounts reclassifiedc
19 — 19 
Balance at December 31, 2021$(398)$10 $(388)
a.Includes net actuarial (losses) gains, net of noncontrolling interest, totaling $(111) million for 2019, $40 million for 2020 and $174 million for 2021.
 Defined Benefit Plans Unrealized Losses on Securities Translation Adjustment Total
Balance at January 1, 2016$(507) $(6) $10
 $(503)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
(91) 2
 
 (89)
Amounts reclassifiedc
44
 
 
 44
Balance at December 31, 2016(554) (4) 10
 (548)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
7
 1
 
 8
Amounts reclassifiedc
53
 
 
 53
Balance at December 31, 2017(494) (3) 10
 (487)
Adoption of new accounting standard for reclassification of income taxes (refer to Note 1)(79) 
 
 (79)
Amounts arising during the perioda,b
(84) 
 
 (84)
Amounts reclassifiedc
48
 3
 
 51
Sale of interest in PT-FI (refer to Note 2)(6) 
 
 (6)
Balance at December 31, 2018$(615) $
 $10
 $(605)
a.Includes net actuarial (losses) gains, net of noncontrolling interest, totaling $(79) million for 2016, $52 million for 2017 and $(87) million for 2018.
b.Includes tax provision totaling $11 million for 2016, $45 million for 2017 and $4 million for 2018.
c.
Includes amortization primarily related to actuarial losses, net of taxes of $4 million for 2016, $5 million for 2017 and none for 2018.

b.Includes tax (benefit) provision totaling $(8) million for 2019, $7 million for 2020 and $2 million for 2021.

c.Includes amortization primarily related to actuarial losses, net of taxes of less than $1 million for 2019, 2020 and 2021.

Stock Award Plans.  FCX currently has awards outstanding under various stock-based compensation plans. The stockholder-approved 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2016 Plan) provides for the issuance of stock options, SARs,stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs and other stock-based awards for up to 72 million common shares. As of December 31, 2018, 58.62021, 30.7 million shares were available for grant under the 2016 Plan, and no shares were available under other plans.


139

Stock-Based Compensation Cost. Compensation cost charged against earnings for stock-based awards for the years ended December 31 follows:
 2018 2017 2016 
Selling, general and administrative expenses$62
 $55
 $69
 
Production and delivery12
 16
 16
 
Capitalized costs
 
 4
 
Total stock-based compensation74
 71
 89
 
Less capitalized costs
 
 (4) 
Tax benefit and noncontrolling interests’ share(4)
a 
(4)
a 
(3)
a 
Impact on net income (loss) from continuing operations$70
 $67
 $82
 
202120202019
Selling, general and administrative expenses$64 $70 $48 
Production and delivery34 29 15 
Total stock-based compensation98 99 63 
Tax benefit and noncontrolling interests’ sharea
(5)(5)(4)
Impact on net income (loss)$93 $94 $59 
a. Charges in the U.S. are not expected to generate a future tax benefit.


Stock Options. Stock options granted under the plans generally expire 10 years after the date of grant. Stock options granted prior to 2018 generally vest in 25 percent annual increments and beginning in 2018 awards granted vest in 33 percentone-third annual increments beginning one year from the date of grant. The award agreements provide that participants will receive the following year’s vesting upon retirement. Therefore, on the date of grant, FCX accelerates one year of amortization for retirement-eligible employees. Stock optionsThe award agreements also provide for accelerated vesting only upon certain qualifying terminations of employment within one year following a change of control.

A summary of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2018,2021, and activity during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, follows:
Number of
Options
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at January 137,100,098 $25.58 
Granted598,000 28.14 
Exercised(11,527,957)19.48 
Expired/Forfeited(4,347,579)51.15 
Balance at December 3121,822,562 23.78 4.3$411 
Vested and exercisable at December 3117,119,081 26.62 3.4$278 
 
Number of
Options
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Balance at January 148,014,688
 $28.63
 
   
Granted3,315,000
 18.74
     
Exercised(801,706) 10.05
 
   
Expired/Forfeited(3,721,618) 39.26
 
   
Balance at December 3146,806,364
 27.40
 4.5 $38
 
         
Vested and exercisable at December 3139,919,885
 29.80
 3.8 $26
 


The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. Expected volatility is based on implied volatilities from traded options on FCX’s common stock and historical volatility of FCX’s common stock. FCX uses historical data to estimate future option exercises, forfeitures and expected life. When appropriate, separate groups of employees who have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected dividend rate is calculated using the expected annual dividend (excluding supplemental dividends) at the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on Federal Reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option.



Information related to stock options during the years ended December 31 follows:
 202120202019
Weighted-average assumptions used to value stock option awards:
Expected volatility58.1 %47.7 %47.8 %
Expected life of options (in years)5.905.836.10
Expected dividend rate2.5 %1.7 %1.8 %
Risk-free interest rate0.6 %1.5 %2.5 %
Weighted-average grant-date fair value (per option)$11.92 $4.72 $4.87 
Intrinsic value of options exercised$194 $82 $
Fair value of options vested$16 $28 $26 
 2018 2017 2016 
Weighted-average assumptions used to value stock option awards:      
Expected volatility46.1% 51.4% 71.6% 
Expected life of options (in years)5.92
 5.70
 5.34
 
Expected dividend rate1.2% 
 
 
Risk-free interest rate2.6% 2.0% 1.3% 
Weighted-average grant-date fair value (per share)$7.84
 $7.61
 $2.64
 
Intrinsic value of options exercised$7
 $5
 $
a 
Fair value of options vested$24
 $25
 $43
 

a. Rounds to less than $1 million.

As of December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had $23$5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.41.0 years.


Stock-Settled PSUs and RSUs. Beginning in 2014, FCX’s executive officers were grantedreceived annual grants of PSUs that vest after three years. For the PSUs granted in 2017 and 2016, the final number of shares to be issued to the executive officers will be determined based on (i) FCX’s achievement of certain financial and operational performance metrics and (ii) FCX’s total shareholder return compared to the shareholder return of a peer group. The total grant date target shares related to the PSU grants were 0.60.7 million for 2017 and 1.52019, 0.8 million for 2016, of which the executive officers will earn (i) between 0 percent2020 and 175 percent of the target shares based on achievement of financial and operating metrics and (ii) +/- 25 percent of the target shares based on FCX’s total shareholder return compared to a peer group. For the PSUs granted in 2018, the final number of shares to be issued to the executive officers will be determined based on (i) FCX’s achievement of certain financial metrics and (ii) FCX’s total shareholder return compared to the shareholder return of a peer group. The total grant date target shares related to the PSU grants were 0.50.3 million for 2018,2021, of which the executive officers will earn (i) between 0 percent and 200
140

percent of the target shares based on achievement of financial metrics and (ii) +/- up to 25 percent of the target shares based on FCX’s total shareholder return compared to the total shareholder return of a peer group.

All of FCX’s executive officers who hold PSUs are retirement eligible, and their PSU awards are therefore non-forfeitable. As such, FCX charges the estimated fair value of the PSU awards to expense at the time the financial and operational, if applicable, metrics are established.


FCX grants RSUs that vest over a period of three years or at the end of three years to certain employees. Some award agreements allow for participants to receive the following year’s vesting upon retirement. Therefore, on the date of grant of these RSU awards, FCX accelerates one year of amortization for retirement-eligible employees. FCX also grants RSUs to its directors. Beginning in December 2015, RSUs granted to directors, which vest on the first anniversary of the grant. Prior to December 2015, RSUs granted to directors generally vest over a perioddate of four years.grant. The fair value of the RSUs is amortized over the vesting period or the period until the director becomes retirement eligible, whichever is shorter. Upon a director’s retirement, all of their unvested RSUs immediately vest. For retirement-eligible directors, the fair value of RSUs is recognized in earnings on the date of grant.


The award agreements provide for accelerated vesting of all RSUs held by directors if there is a change of control (as defined in the award agreements) and for accelerated vesting of all RSUs held by employees if they experience a qualifying termination within one year following a change of control.


Dividends attributable to RSUs and PSUs accrue and are paid if the award vests. A summary of outstanding stock-settled RSUs and PSUs as of December 31, 2018,2021, and activity during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, follows:
Number of AwardsWeighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per AwardAggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at January 17,523,022 $16.79  
Granted2,121,755 29.15  
Vested(1,814,976)15.72  
Forfeited(28,916)20.29  
Balance at December 317,800,885 20.38 $326 
 Number of Awards Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Award 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at January 15,206,624
 $18.48
  
Granted2,127,785
a 
19.11
  
Vested(753,806) 15.53
  
Forfeited(775,966) 11.91
  
Balance at December 315,804,637
 19.97
 $60

a. Excludes 187 thousand PSUs related to 2017 grants for which the performance metrics have not yet been established.


The total fair value of stock-settled RSUs and PSUs granted was $41$62 million during 2018, $322021, $47 million during 20172020 and $37$24 million during 2016.2019. The total intrinsic value of stock-settled RSUs and PSUs vested was $14$56 million during 2018, $452021, $18 million during 20172020 and $22$26 million during 2016.2019. As of December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had $6$17 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-settled RSUs expected to be recognized over approximately 1.11.2 years.


Cash-Settled RSUs and PSUs.RSUs. Cash-settled RSUs are similar to stock-settled RSUs, but are settled in cash rather than in shares of common stock. These cash-settled RSUs generally vest over three years of service. Some award agreements allow for participants to receive the following year’s vesting upon retirement. Therefore, on the date of grant of these cash-settled RSU awards, FCX accelerates one year of amortization for retirement-eligible employees. The cash-settled RSUs are classified as liability awards, and the fair value of these awards is remeasured each reporting period until the vesting dates. The award agreements for cash-settled RSUs provide for accelerated vesting upon certain qualifying terminations of employment within one year following a change of control (as defined in the award agreements).control.


In 2015, certain members of FM O&G’s senior management were granted cash-settled PSUs that vested over three years. The total grant date target shares related to the 2015 cash-settled PSU grants were 582 thousand shares, of which FM O&G’s senior management earned a total of 487 thousand shares at maturity during 2018 based on the achievement of applicable performance goals.

The cash-settled RSUs and PSUs are classified as liability awards, and the fair value of these awards is remeasured each reporting period until the vesting dates.

Dividends attributable to cash-settled RSUs and PSUs accrue and are paid if the award vests. A summary of outstanding cash-settled RSUs and PSUs as of December 31, 2018,2021, and activity during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, follows:
Number of AwardsWeighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per AwardAggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at January 11,521,097 $12.92  
Granted308,600 28.00 
Vested(753,574)13.94 
Forfeited(22,199)15.37  
Balance at December 311,053,924 16.56 $44 

141

 Number of Awards Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Award 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at January 11,307,235
 $13.32
  
Granted870,312
 17.91
  
Vested(666,975) 14.12
  
Forfeited(23,706) 15.92
  
Balance at December 311,486,866
 15.61
 $15

The total grant-date fair value of cash-settled RSUs was $16$9 million during 2018,2021, $11 million during 2020 and $10 million during 2017 and $4 million during 2016.2019. The intrinsic value of cash-settled RSUs and PSUs vested was $12$24 million during 2018, $272021, $11 million during 20172020 and $15$8 million during 2016.2019. The accrued liability associated with cash-settled RSUs consisted of a current portion of $7$26 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities) and a long-term portion of $3$6 million (included in other liabilities) at December 31, 2018,2021, and a current portion of $11$22 million and a long-term portion of $5$6 million at December 31, 2017.2020.


Other Information. The following table includes amounts related to exercises of stock options and vesting of RSUs and PSUs during the years ended December 31:31:
 202120202019
FCX shares tendered to pay the exercise price   
and/or the minimum required withholding taxesa
1,358,101 1,193,183 670,508 
Cash received from stock option exercises$210 $51 $
Actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions$$$
Amounts FCX paid for employee taxes$29 $17 $
 2018 2017 2016 
FCX shares tendered to pay the exercise price      
and/or the minimum required taxesa
195,322
 1,041,937
 906,120
 
Cash received from stock option exercises$8
 $5
 $
b 
Actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions$3
 $1
 $
b 
Amounts FCX paid for employee taxes$4
 $15
 $6
 
a.
Under terms of the related plans, upon exercise of stock options and vesting of stock-settled RSUs, employees may tender FCX shares to pay the exercise price and/or the minimum required taxes.
b.Rounds to less than $1 million.

a.Under terms of the related plans, upon exercise of stock options, vesting of stock-settled RSUs and payout of PSUs, employees may tender FCX shares to pay the exercise price and/or the minimum required withholding taxes.


NOTE 11.  INCOME TAXES
Geographic sources of income (losses) before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings for the years ended December 31 consist of the following:
 202120202019
U.S.$1,861 $(40)$(287)
Foreign5,798 1,837 593 
Total$7,659 $1,797 $306 
 2018 2017 2016
U.S.$390
 $20
 $(5,179)
Foreign3,502
 2,882
 1,707
Total$3,892
 $2,902
 $(3,472)


Income taxes are provided on the earnings of FCX’s material foreign subsidiaries under the assumption that these earnings will be distributed. FCX has not provided deferred income taxes for other differences between the book and tax carrying amounts of its investments in material foreign subsidiaries as FCX considers its ownership positions to be permanent in duration, and quantification of the related deferred tax liability is not practicable. 


FCX’s (provision for) benefit fromprovision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 consist consists of the following:
 202120202019
Current income taxes:   
Federal$— $53 a$(23)b,c
State(11)(1)
Foreign(2,460)(816)d(462)
Total current(2,471)(764)(482)
Deferred income taxes:   
Federal(184)48 
State(4)
Foreign(23)(306)(101)
Total deferred(211)(298)(45)
Adjustments193 e37 12 
Operating loss carryforwards190 81 
Provision for income taxes$(2,299)$(944)$(510)
a.Includes a credit of $53 million associated with the reversal of the charge discussed in footnote c below.
b.As a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) guidance released in 2019, FCX recorded a $29 million credit.
c.Includes a charge of $53 million associated with the sale of FCX’s interest in the lower zone of the Timok exploration project.
d.Includes a charge of $135 million associated with the gain on sale of Kisanfu.
e.Primarily reflects the release of valuation allowances on NOLs at PT Rio Tinto (see below).

142

 2018 2017 2016 
Current income taxes:      
Federal$46
a 
$(3) $164
 
State1
 (10) 17
 
Foreign(1,445)
a 
(1,426) (352) 
Total current(1,398) (1,439) (171) 
       
Deferred income taxes:      
Federal(106) 64
 137
 
State(8) 10
 41
 
Foreign(102) 89
 (451) 
Total deferred(216) 163
 (273) 
       
Adjustments504
b 
393
c 
13
d 
Operating loss carryforwards119
 
 60
 
Provision for income taxes$(991) $(883) $(371) 
a.In 2018, FCX completed its analysis of the Act and recognized benefits totaling $123 million ($76 million to the U.S. tax provision and $47 million to PT-FI’s tax provision) associated with alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit refunds.
b.Includes net tax credits totaling $504 million resulting from the reduction in PT-FI's statutory tax rates in accordance with PT-FI’s new special mining license (IUPK).
c.Includes net tax credits totaling $393 million associated with the Act, including $272 million for the reversal of valuation allowances associated with AMT credit refunds and $121 million for a decrease in corporate income tax rates.
d.Benefit related to changes in Peruvian tax rules.




A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to FCX’s effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31 follows:
 2018 2017 2016
 Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
U.S. federal statutory tax rate$(817) (21)% $(1,016) (35)% $1,215
 (35)%
Valuation allowance, net129
a 
3
 28
 1
 (1,680)
b 
48
Foreign tax credit limitation(195) (5) (159) (5) (598) 17
U.S. tax reformc
123
 3
 393
 14
 
 
Cerro Verde royalty disputed
(55) (1) (129) (5) 
 
Change in PT-FI tax rates504
 13
 
 
 
 
Impairment of oil and gas properties
 
 
 
 520
e 
(15)
Percentage depletion141
 4
 227
 8
 211
 (6)
Withholding and other impacts on           
foreign earnings(232) (6) (216) (7) (93) 3
Effect of foreign rates different than the U.S.           
federal statutory rate(494) (13) 17
 1
 45
 (1)
State income taxes7
 1
 (5) (1) 46
b 
(1)
Other items, net(102) (3) (23) (1) (37) 1
Provision for income taxes$(991) (25)% $(883) (30)% $(371) 11 %
a.Refer to “Valuation Allowance” below for discussion of changes.
b.Includes tax charges totaling $1.6 billion in 2016 as a result of the impairment to U.S. oil and gas properties to establish valuation allowances against U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets that will not generate a future benefit.
c.Refer to discussion of 2017 U.S. Tax Reform below.
d.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion of the Cerro Verde royalty dispute.
e.Reflects a loss under U.S. federal income tax law related to the impairment of investments in oil and gas properties.

 202120202019
 AmountPercentAmountPercentAmountPercent
U.S. federal statutory tax rate$(1,608)(21)%$(377)(21)%$(64)(21)%
Valuation allowancea
221 (210)(12)(149)(49)
PT Rio Tinto valuation allowancea
189 — — — — 
PT-FI historical tax disputesb
(193)(3)(8)— (145)(47)
Percentage depletion221 104 118 39 
Effect of foreign rates different than the U.S.
federal statutory rate(328)(4)(109)(6)(64)(21)
Withholding and other impacts on
foreign earnings(678)(9)(193)(11)(55)(18)
Adjustment to deferred taxes— — — — (49)c(16)
Non-deductible permanent differences— — — — (47)(15)
Uncertain tax positions13 — (15)(1)(47)(15)
U.S. tax reform— — — — 29 d
Foreign tax credit limitation(11)— 28 (16)(5)
State income taxes(14)— (2)— 16 
Cerro Verde historical tax disputese
— — (39)(2)
Timok exploration project sale— — 53 (15)(5)
Sale of Kisanfu— — (135)(8)— — 
Other items, net(111)(1)(41)(3)(24)(9)
Provision for income taxes$(2,299)(30)%$(944)(53)%$(510)(166)%
a.Refer to “Valuation Allowance” below.
b.Refer to “Income Tax Matters” below.
c.Represents net charges primarily to adjust deferred taxes on historical balance sheet items in accordance with tax accounting principles.
d.As a result of the Act guidance released in 2019, FCX recorded a $29 million credit.
e.Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.

FCX paid federal, state and foreign income taxes totaling $2$1.3 billion in 2018, $7022021, $397 million in 20172020 and $203$610 million in 2016 (including $27 million for discontinued operations).2019. FCX received refunds of federal, state and foreign income taxes of $108$109 million in 2018, $3292021, $265 million in 20172020 and $247$306 million in 2016.2019.


143

The components of deferred taxes follow:
 December 31,
 20212020
Deferred tax assets:  
Foreign tax credits$1,536 $1,641 
Accrued expenses1,193 1,194 
Net operating losses (NOLs)2,220 2,443 
Employee benefit plans105 177 
Other252 227 
Deferred tax assets5,306 5,682 
Valuation allowances(4,087)(4,732)
Net deferred tax assets1,219 950 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs(4,492)(4,489)
Undistributed earnings(807)(694)
Other(152)(175)
Total deferred tax liabilities(5,451)(5,358)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(4,232)$(4,408)
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Deferred tax assets:   
Foreign tax credits$1,814
 $2,129
Accrued expenses881
 789
Oil and gas properties
 236
Net operating losses2,235
 2,043
Employee benefit plans245
 248
Other212
 260
Deferred tax assets5,387
 5,705
Valuation allowances(4,507) (4,575)
Net deferred tax assets880
 1,130
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs(4,200) (3,754)
Undistributed earnings(578) (811)
Other(130) (223)
Total deferred tax liabilities(4,908) (4,788)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(4,028) $(3,658)


Tax Attributes. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had (i) U.S. foreign tax credits of $1.8$1.5 billion that will expire between 20192022 and 2027, (ii) U.S. federal net operating losses (NOLs) of $6.0$6.1 billion that primarily expire between 2036 and 2037, of which $0.2 billion can be carried forward indefinitely, (iii) U.S. state net operating lossesNOLs of $10.5$10.9 billion that primarily expire between 20192022 and 2038,2041, (iv) Spanish net operating lossesNOLs of $537 million$0.5 billion that can be carried forward indefinitely and (v) Indonesian net operating lossesIndonesia NOLs of $975 million$0.9 billion that expire between 20202022 and 2025.2026.


Valuation Allowance.Allowances. On the basis of available information at December 31, 2018,2021, including positive and negative evidence, FCX has provided valuation allowances for certain of its deferred tax assets where it believes it is more likely than notmore- likely-than-not that some portion or all of such assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances totaled $4.5$4.1 billion at December 31, 2018,2021, and $4.6covered all of FCX’s U.S. foreign tax credits and U.S. federal NOLs, substantially all of its U.S. state NOLs, and a portion of its foreign NOLs. Valuation allowances totaled $4.7 billion at December 31, 2017,2020, and covered all of FCX’s U.S. foreign tax credits, U.S. federal net operating losses,NOLs, foreign net operating losses and substantially all of its U.S. state net operating losses. FCX’s valuation allowances at December 31, 2017, also covered all of its U.S. federal capital losses.NOLs.


The valuation allowance related to FCX’s U.S. foreign tax credits totaled $1.8$1.5 billionat December 31, 2018.2021. FCX has operations in tax jurisdictions where statutory income taxes and withholding taxes are in excess of the U.S. federal income tax rate. Valuation allowances are recordedrecognized on foreign tax credits for which no benefit is expected to be realized.


The valuation allowance related to FCX’s U.S. federal, state and foreign net operating lossesNOLs totaled $2.0 billion and foreignother deferred tax assets totaled $2.2 billion and $458$561 million respectively, at December 31, 2018. Net operating losses2021. NOLs and deferred tax assets represent future deductions for which a benefit will only be realized to the extent these deductions offset future income. FCX develops an estimate of which future tax deductions will be realized and providesrecognizes a valuation allowance to the extent these deductions are not expected to be realized in future periods.


Valuation allowances will continue to be carried on U.S. foreign tax credits, U.S. federal, state and foreign net operating lossesNOLs and U.S. federal, state and foreign deferred tax assets, until such time that (i) FCX generates taxable income against which any of the assets, credits or net operating lossesNOLs can be used, (ii) forecasts of future income provide sufficient positive evidence to support reversal of the valuation allowances or (iii) FCX identifies a prudent and feasible means of securing the benefit of the assets, credits or net operating losses that can be implemented.


The $68$645 million net decrease in the valuation allowances during 20182021 is primarily related to decreases totaling $315a $219 million indecrease associated with U.S. federal NOLs utilized during 2021, a $105 million decrease related to expirations of U.S. foreign tax credits and $228 million decrease associated with expirations and 2017 tax reform adjustments, and $45 million in U.S. federalPT Rio Tinto NOLs resulting from positive evidence supporting future taxable income against which net operating losses associatedcan be used. Changes in assumptions about future taxable income against which PT Rio Tinto NOLs can be utilized resulted from delays in timing of the anticipated merger of PT Rio Tinto into PT-FI.
144

Other Events. In connection with 2018 usagethe negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy, governments throughout the world announced measures that are intended to provide tax and 2017 tax reform adjustments, partly offset by a $244 million increase in foreign net operating losses for which no benefit is expected to be realized.

2017 U.S. Tax Reform. Theother financial relief. Such measures include the American Rescue Plan Act which wasof 2021, enacted on March 11, 2021, and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), enacted on March 27, 2020. None of these measures resulted in material impacts to FCX’s provision for income taxes for the years ended December 22, 2017, included significant modifications to then-existing U.S. tax laws31, 2021 and created many new complex tax provisions. The Act reduced the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, eliminated the corporate AMT, provided for a refund of AMT credits, maintained hard minerals percentage depletion, allowed for immediate expensing of2020. However, certain qualified property and generally broadened the tax base. The Act also created a territorial tax system (with a one-time mandatory tax on previously deferred foreign earnings), created anti-base erosion rules that require companies to pay a minimum tax on foreign earnings and may disallow certain payments from U.S. corporations to foreign related parties.

In December 2018, FCX completed its analysis of the Act and recognized benefits totaling $123 million associated with AMT credit refunds. In 2017, FCX recorded net tax benefits related to specific provisions of the CARES Act totaling $393 million, reflectingprovided FCX with the reversalopportunity to accelerate collections of valuation allowancestax refunds, primarily those associated with anticipatedthe U.S. alternative minimum tax (AMT). FCX collected U.S. AMT refunds of AMT credits through 2021 ($272 million) and a decrease in corporate income tax rates ($121 million).

Elimination of Corporate AMT and Refund of AMT Credits. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the corporate AMT was repealed. FCX has historically incurred an AMT liability in excess of regular tax liability, resulting in accumulated AMT credits totaling $490 million as of December 31, 2017. The Act allows the use of existing corporate AMT credits to offset regular tax liability for tax years after December 31, 2017. AMT credits in excess of regular liability are refundable on tax returns for the years 2018 through 2021.

Prior to the Act, FCX recognized a $110 million benefit for AMT credits expected to be refunded. As a result of the Act, FCX recognized a provisional net benefit of $272$24 million in 2017, consisting of a $380 million tax benefit for historical AMT credits expected to be refunded, partially offset by a $108 million tax charge to establish a reserve for uncertain tax positions. At December 31, 2018, FCX recognized an additional $123 million net benefit for historical AMT credits consisting of $512021 and $244 million in additional refundable credits and $72 million in reduction2020. FCX continues to reserves.


Reduction in Corporate Income Tax Rate. The Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. While applicable for years after December 31, 2017, existingevaluate income tax accounting guidance requires the effectsconsiderations of changes in tax rates and lawsCOVID-19 measures as they develop, including any impact on its measurement of existing deferred tax balancesassets and deferred tax liabilities. FCX will recognize any impact from COVID-19 related changes to be recognizedtax laws in the period in which the new legislation is enacted.

Indonesia Tax Matters. In fourth-quarter 2017, FCX recognized this change in the federal statutory rate2018, PT-FI received unfavorable Indonesia Tax Court decisions with respect to its appeal of capitalized mine development costs on its 2012 and recorded a provisional net benefit of $121 million, consisting of a $1.1 billion2014 corporate income tax benefit associated with changes in related valuation allowances, partly offset by a $975 million tax charge related to existing net U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities. In fourth-quarter 2018, FCX finalized the impact of this change in federal statutory rate resulting in a net zero impact, consisting of a $32 million tax benefit associated with changes in related valuation allowances offset by a $32 million tax charge related to existing net U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Transition Tax on Previously Deferred Foreign Earnings. Under the Act, U.S. shareholders owning at least 10 percent of a foreign subsidiary generally must recognize taxable income equalreturns. PT-FI appealed those decisions to the shareholder’s pro rata shareIndonesia Supreme Court. In 2019, the Indonesia Supreme Court communicated an unfavorable ruling regarding the treatment of accumulated post-1986 historical Earningsmine development costs on PT-FI’s 2014 tax return. During the fourth quarter of 2019, PT-FI met with the Indonesia Tax Office and Profits (E&P). The portion of any E&P associated with cash or cash equivalents is taxed atdeveloped a rate of 15.5 percent, while any remaining E&P is taxed at a reduced rate of 8 percent. The resulting tax liability (Transition Tax) may be reduced by available foreign tax credits. Because FCX operates in foreign jurisdictions with statutory tax rates in excessframework for resolution of the U.S. historical statutorydisputed matters. On December 30, 2019, PT-FI made a payment of $250 million based on its understanding of the framework for resolution of disputes arising from the audits of the tax rateyears 2012 through 2016, as well as tax years 2017 and 2018. Additional administrative steps would need to be completed by both PT-FI and the Indonesia Tax Office in order to implement the resolution.

During October 2021, PT-FI participated in discussions with the Indonesia tax office regarding progress on the framework for resolution of 35 percent,disputes arising from the December 31, 2017, Transition Tax was fully offset by foreignaudits of tax credits generated in 2017. During fourth-quarter 2018, additional guidance was released by the IRS clarifying the computation of Transition Tax liability.years 2012 through 2016. As a result of this additional guidance,these discussions and the revised positions taken by both the Indonesia tax office and PT-FI, FCX recognizedbelieves it can no longer conclude a $29 millionresolution of all of the disputed tax charge relateditems at a more-likely-than-not threshold. PT-FI will continue to Transition Tax for 2018.

Anti-Base Erosion Rules. Forengage with the Indonesia tax years that begin after December 31, 2017, applicable taxpayers are required to pay the Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT). BEAT is an alternative tax calculation that disallows deductionoffice in pursuit of certain amounts paid or accrued byaspects of the original framework for resolution.

During 2019, in conjunction with the framework for resolution, PT-FI recorded net charges totaling $304 million, including $123 million for non-deductible penalties recorded to other (expense) income, net, $78 million for non-deductible interest recorded to interest expense, net and $103 million to provision for income tax expense, primarily for the impact of a U.S. taxpayerreduction in the statutory rate on PT-FI’s deferred tax assets.

During 2020, in connection with progress of the framework for resolution, PT-FI recorded additional net charges of $46 million, including $9 million for non-deductible penalties recorded to a foreign related party. The BEAT provisions do not currently impact FCX’s computation of U.S. federal taxable income.other (expense) income, net and $35 million for non-deductible interest recorded to interest expense, net, and $2 million to provision for income tax expense.


The Act also included provisions toDuring 2021, mostly in connection with the October 2021 meeting with the Indonesia tax a new class of income called Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI). Under the new GILTI provisions, FCX will use U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards in current and future tax years against income that would otherwise not generate a net tax liability absent the availability of net operating losses. As a result, FCX does not consider GILTI to be a source of income against which a benefit for U.S. federal net operating losses can be realized. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, FCX is allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (i) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred or (ii) factoring such amounts into the measurement of deferred taxes. FCX has elected to treat taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current period expense when incurred.

Executive Compensation Limitation. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, tax deductible compensation of covered employees is limited to $1 million. In addition, the definition of covered employees is revised to include the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer,office and the three other highest paid officers. If an individual is a covered employee for a tax year beginning after December 31, 2016, the individual remains a covered employee for all future years. Under a transition rule, the changes do not apply to any remuneration under specified contracts in effect on November 2, 2017. During fourth-quarter 2018, FCX determined that only immaterial adjustments were needed in relation to future disallowance of deferred executive compensation balances as of December 31, 2017.

Other. As of December 31, 2018, FCX has offset $5.4 billion of foreign source income with U.S. source losses. Under existing U.S. tax law, FCX has the ability to re-characterize $5.4 billion of future U.S. source income into foreign source income. While utilization of U.S. foreign tax credits is dependent upon FCX generating future U.S. tax liabilities within the carryforward period, this re-sourcing may permit FCX to utilize up to $1.1 billionprogress of the $1.8 billion foreign tax credits that would otherwise expire unused.

Other Events. On December 21, 2018, FCX completed the transaction with the Indonesian government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rightsframework for resolution, PT-FI recorded total additional net charges of $384 million, including $155 million for non-deductible penalties recorded to other (expense) income, net, $43 million for non-deductible interest recorded to interest expense, net, and share ownership. Concurrent with closing the transaction, the Indonesian government granted PT-FI an IUPK$186 million to replace its former COW. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI is subject to a 25 percent corporateprovision for income tax rateexpense.

Peru Tax Matters. SUNAT (National Superintendency of Customs and a 10 percent profits tax on net income beginning in 2019. As a result of the change in statutory tax rate applicable to deferred income tax liabilities, during fourth-quarter 2018, FCX recognized a tax credit of $504 million.


SUNAT,Administration), the Peru national tax authority, has assessed mining royalties on ore processed by the Cerro Verde concentrator for the period December 2006 to December 2013, which Cerro Verde has contested on the basis that its 1998 stability agreement exempts from royalties all minerals extracted from its mining concessions, irrespective of the method used for processing those minerals. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion of the Cerro Verde royalty dispute and net charges recorded in 2018 and 2017.dispute.


In December 2016, the PeruvianPeru parliament passed tax legislation that, in part, modified the applicable tax rates established in its December 2014 tax legislation, which progressively decreased the corporate income tax rate from 30 percent in 2014 to 26 percent in 2019 and thereafter, and also increased the dividend tax rate on distributions from 4.1 percent in 2014 to 9.3 percent in 2019 and thereafter. Under the tax legislation, which was effective January 1, 2017, the corporate income tax rate was 29.5 percent, and the dividend tax rate on distributions of earnings was 5 percent. Cerro Verde’s current mining stability agreement subjects FCXit to a stable income tax rate of 32 percent through the expiration of the agreement on December 31, 2028. The tax rate on dividend distributions is not stabilized by the agreement.



145

Chile Tax Matters. In September 2014, the ChileanChile legislature approved a tax reform package that implemented a dual tax system, which was amended in January 2016. Under previous rules, FCX’s share of income from ChileanChile operations was subject to an effective 35 percent tax rate allocated between income taxes and dividend withholding taxes. Under the amended tax reform package, FCX’s ChileanChile operation is subject to the “Partially-Integrated System,” resulting in FCX’s share of income from El Abra being subject to progressively increasing effective tax rates of 35 percent through 2019 and 44.5 percent in 2020 and thereafter. In November 2017, the progression of increasing tax rates was delayed by the ChileanChile legislature so that the 35 percent rate continuescontinued through 2021, increasing to 44.5 percent in 2022 and thereafter. In January 2020, the Chile legislature approved a tax reform package that would further delay the 44.5 percent rate until 2027 and thereafter. 


In 2010, the ChileanChile legislature approved an increase in mining royalty taxes to help fund earthquake reconstruction activities, education and health programs. Mining royalty taxes at FCX’s El Abra mine were 4 percent for the years 2013 through 2017. Beginning in 2018, and through 2023 mining royalty rates moved toat FCX’s El Abra mine are based on a sliding scale of 5 to 14 percent (depending on a defined operational margin).


Uncertain Tax Positions. FCX accounts for uncertain income tax positions using a threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FCX’s policy associated with uncertain tax positions is to record accrued interest in interest expense and accrued penalties in other (expense) income, and expensenet rather than in the provision for income taxes.

A summary of the activities associated with FCX’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31 follows:follows. The balance at year-end December 31, 2019, was revised by $115 million and the balance at year-end December 31, 2020, was revised by $179 million to adjust for amounts paid on accruals not yet settled.
202120202019
Balance at beginning of year$474 $491 $494 
Additions:
Prior year tax positions330 56 86 
Current year tax positions71 60 11 
Decreases:
Prior year tax positions(30)(82)(75)
Settlements with taxing authorities(37)(51)(25)
Balance at end of year$808 $474 $491 
 2018 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year$390
 $101
 $110
Additions:     
Prior year tax positions100
 302
 5
Current year tax positions14
 6
 28
Decreases:     
Prior year tax positions(86) (1) (3)
Settlements with taxing authorities(9) (17) 
Lapse of statute of limitations(5) (1) (39)
Balance at end of year$404
 $390
 $101


The total amount of accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits included in the consolidated balance sheets was $186$620 million at December 31, 2018,2021, primarily relating to unrecognized tax benefits associated with cost recovery methods and royalties and other related mining taxes, and $22$307 million at December 31, 2017,2020, and $19$339 million at December 31, 2016.2019.


The reserve for unrecognized tax benefits of $404$808 million at December 31, 2018,2021, included $296$694 million ($147 ($465 million net of income tax benefits and valuation allowances) that, if recognized, would reduce FCX’s provision for income taxes. Changes toin the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits associated with current yearand prior-year tax positions were primarily related to uncertainties associated with FCXsFCX's tax treatment of social welfare payments and cost recovery methods. Changes in the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits associated with prior year tax positions were primarily related to uncertainties associated with royalties and other related mining taxes and AMT credit refunds.

Changes to the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits associated with the lapse of statute of limitations were primarily related to social welfare payments. There continues to be uncertainty related to the timing of settlements with taxing authorities, but if additional settlements are agreed upon during 2019,the year 2022, FCX could experience a change in its reserve for unrecognized tax benefits.


FCX or its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The tax years for FCX’s major tax jurisdictions that remain subject to examination are as follows:
JurisdictionYears Subject to ExaminationAdditional Open Years
U.S. Federal2017-20182014-2016, 2019-2021
Indonesia2011-20182020-2021
Peru20162017-2021
Chile20202018-2019, 2021
JurisdictionYears Subject to ExaminationAdditional Open Years
U.S. FederalN/A2014-2018
Indonesia2008, 2011-20162017-2018
Peru2012-20132014-2018
Chile2016-20172018


146

NOTE 12.  CONTINGENCIES
Environmental. FCX subsidiaries are subject to various national, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern emissions of air pollutants; discharges of water pollutants; generation, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances, hazardous wastes and other toxic materials; and remediation, restoration and reclamation of environmental contamination. FCX subsidiaries that operate in the U.S. also are subject to potential liabilities arising under CERCLA and similar state laws that impose responsibility on current and previous owners and operators of a facility for the remediation of hazardous substances released from the facility into the environment, including damages to natural resources, in some cases irrespective of when the damage to the environment occurred or who caused it. Remediation liability also extends to persons who arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances or transported the hazardous substances to a disposal site selected by the transporter. These liabilities are often shared on a joint and several basis, meaning that each responsible party is fully responsible for the remediation if some or all of the other historical owners or operators no longer exist, do not have the financial ability to respond or cannot be found. As a result, because of FCX’s acquisition of FMC in 2007, many of the subsidiary companies FCX now owns are responsible for a wide variety of environmental remediation projects throughout the U.S., and FCX expects to spend substantial sums annually for many years to address those remediation issues. Certain FCX subsidiaries have been advised by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture and various state agencies that, under CERCLA or similar state laws and regulations, they may be liable for costs of responding to environmental conditions at a number of sites that have been or are being investigated to determine whether releases of hazardous substances have occurred and, if so, to develop and implement remedial actions to address environmental concerns. FCX is also subject to claims where the release of hazardous substances is alleged to have damaged natural resources (NRD) and to litigation by individuals allegedly exposed to hazardous substances. As of December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had more than 100 active remediation projects, including NRD claims, in 2624 U.S. states. The aggregate environmental obligation for approximately 60 percent of the active remediation projects totaled less than $20 million at December 31, 2021.


A summary of changes in estimated environmental obligations for the years ended December 31 follows:
 202120202019
Balance at beginning of year$1,584 $1,561 $1,511 
Accretion expensea
104 102 102 
Additionsb
60 38 23 
Reductionsb
(20)(58)(1)
Spending(64)(59)(74)
Balance at end of year1,664 1,584 1,561 
Less current portion(64)(83)(106)
Long-term portion$1,600 $1,501 $1,455 
 2018 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of year$1,439
 $1,221
 $1,215
Accretion expensea
100
 84
 81
Additionsb
56
 241
 26
Reductionsb

 (43) (43)
Spending(84) (64) (58)
Balance at end of year1,511
 1,439
 1,221
Less current portion(132) (134) (129)
Long-term portion$1,379
 $1,305
 $1,092
a.Represents accretion of the fair value of environmental obligations assumed in the 2007 acquisition of FMC, which were determined on a discounted cash flow basis.
b.Adjustments to environmental obligations that do not provide future economic benefits are charged to operating income. Reductions primarily reflect revisions for changes in the anticipated scope and timing of projects and other noncash adjustments.

a.Represents accretion of the fair value of environmental obligations assumed in the 2007 acquisition of FMC, which were determined on a discounted cash flow basis.

b.Adjustments to environmental obligations that do not provide future economic benefits are charged to operating income. Adjustments primarily reflect revisions for changes in the anticipated scope and timing of projects and other noncash adjustments.

Estimated future environmental cash payments (on an undiscounted and unescalatedde-escalated basis) total $132$89 million in 2019, $1172022, $80 million in 2020, $1192023, $105 million in 2021, $882024, $98 million in 2022, $1002025, $100 million in 20232026 and $2.7$3.2 billion thereafter. The amount and timing of these estimated payments will change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, changes in scope and timing of remediation activities, the settlement of environmental matters and as actual spending occurs.


At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX’s environmental obligations totaled $1.5$1.7 billion,, including $1.4$1.5 billion recorded on a discounted basis for those obligations assumed in the FMC acquisition at fair value. On an undiscounted and unescalatedde-escalated basis, these obligations totaled $3.3$3.7 billion. FCX estimates it is reasonably possible that these obligations could range between $2.7$3.3 billion and $3.7$4.2 billion on an undiscounted and unescalatedde-escalated basis.


At December 31, 2018,2021, the most significant environmental obligations were associated with the Pinal Creek site in Arizona; the Newtown Creek site in New York City; historical smelter sites principally located in Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania; and uranium mining sites in the western U.S. The recorded environmental obligations for these sites totaled $1.3$1.4 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. FCX may also be
147

subject to litigation brought by private parties, regulators and local governmental authorities related to these historical sites. A discussion of these sites follows.


Pinal Creek. The Pinal Creek site was listed under the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality’s (ADEQ) Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund program in 1989 for contamination in the shallow alluvial aquifers within the Pinal Creek drainage near Miami, Arizona. Since that time, environmental remediation has been performed by members of the Pinal Creek Group, consisting of Freeport-McMoRan Miami Inc. (Miami), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FCX, and two other companies. Pursuant to a 2010 settlement agreement, Miami agreed to take full responsibility for future groundwater remediation at the Pinal Creek site, with limited exceptions. Remediation work consisting of groundwater extraction and treatment plus source control capping areis expected to continue for many years in the future.years.


Newtown Creek. From the 1930s until 1964, Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation (PDRC), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FCX, operated a copper smelter, and from the 1930s until 1984 operated a copper refinery, on the banks of Newtown Creek (the creek), which is a 3.5-mile-long waterway that forms part of the boundary between Brooklyn and Queens in New York City. Heavy industrialization along the banks of the creek and discharges from the City of New York’s sewer system over more than a century resulted in significant environmental contamination of the waterway. In 2010, EPA notified PDRC, four other companies and the City of New York that EPA considers them to be PRPs under CERCLA. The notified parties began working with EPA to identify other PRPs. In 2010, EPA designated the creek as a Superfund site, and in 2011, PDRC and fivefour other partiescompanies (the Newtown Creek Group, NCG) and the City of New York entered an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) to perform a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) to assess the nature and extent of environmental contamination in the creek and identify potential remedial options. The partiesNCG’s RI/FS work under the AOC and their efforts to identify other PRPs are ongoing. EPA recently identified eight additional parties as PRPs for the creek. The NCG submitted a final draft RI was submittedreport in October 2021, which is currently under review by EPA. The NCG expects to submit a draft FS report to EPA in November 2016,late 2025 and the draft FS is expectedcurrently expects EPA to be submitted to EPA by the end of 2020. EPA is not expected to proposeselect a finalcreek-wide remedy until after the RI/FS is completed, but has recently considered allowing for interim remedial measures as suggested by the PRPs. EPA’s remedial decision could be made in 2021 and remedial design could begin in 2022,2026, with the actual remediation construction starting several years later. In July 2019, the NCG entered into an AOC with EPA to conduct a Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) of the first two miles of the creek to support an evaluation of an early interim remedy for that section of the creek. In July 2021, EPA terminated the FFS, which effectively means remediation of the lower creek will be performed at the same time as the site-wide remedy. FCX’s environmental liability balance for the creek was $318 million at December 31, 2021. The actualfinal costs of fulfilling this remedial obligation and the allocation of costs among PRPs are uncertain and subject to change based on the results of the RI/FS, the remedy ultimately selected by EPA and related allocation determinations. TheChanges to the overall cost of this remedial obligation and the portion ultimately allocated to PDRC could be material to FCX. During 2017, FCX recorded charges of $138 million for revised cost estimates for the Newtown Creek environmental obligation.


Historical Smelter Sites. FCX subsidiaries and their predecessors at various times owned or operated copper, zinc and lead smelters or refineries in states including Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania. For some of these former processing sites, certain FCX subsidiaries have been advised by EPA or state agencies that they may be liable for costs of investigating and, if appropriate, remediating environmental conditions associated with these former processing facilities. At other sites, certain FCX subsidiaries have entered into state voluntary remediation programs to investigate and, if appropriate, remediate onsiteon-site and offsiteoff-site conditions associated with the facilities. The historical processing sites are in various stages of assessment and remediation. At some of these sites, disputes with local residents and elected officials regarding alleged health effects or the effectiveness of remediation efforts have resulted in litigation of various types, and similar litigation at other sites is possible.



From 1920 until 1986, United States Metals Refining Company (USMR), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FCX, owned and operated a copper smelter and refinery in the Borough of Carteret, New Jersey. Since the early 1980s, the site has been the subject of environmental investigation and remediation, under the direction and supervision of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Protection (NJDEP). On-site contamination is in the later stages of remediation. In 2012, after receiving a request from NJDEP, USMR also began investigating and remediating off-site properties, which is ongoing. As a result of off-site soil sampling in public and private areas near the former Carteret smelter, FCX established an environmental obligation for known and potential off-site environmental remediation. Assessments of sediments in the adjacent Arthur Kill and sampling and analysis within the offsite area as we obtain access to residential properties are ongoing and could result in additional adjustments to the related environmental remediation obligation in future periods. The extent of contamination and potential remedial actions are uncertain and may take several years to evaluate.


148

On January 30, 2017, a putative class action titled Juan Duarte, Betsy Duarte and N.D., Infant, by Parents and Natural Guardians Juan Duarte and Betsy Duarte, Leroy Nobles and Betty Nobles, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. United States Metals Refining Company, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and Amax Realty Development, Inc., Docket No. 734-17, was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey against USMR, FCX, and Amax Realty Development, Inc. The defendants removed this litigation to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, where it remains pending. In December 2017, the plaintiffs amended their complaint and FCX was dismissed as a defendantpending, and FMC was added as a defendant to the lawsuit.defendant. The suit alleges that USMR generated and disposed of smelter waste at the site and allegedly released contaminants onsiteon-site and offsiteoff-site through discharges to surface water and air emissions over a period of decades and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages for economic losses, including loss ofdiminished property value, medical monitoring, punitive damagesvalues, additional soil investigation and remediation and other damages. In October 2018,January 2020, the magistrate judge deniedparties completed briefing on the plaintiffs’ July 2018 request to amend the complaint to rejoin FCX as a defendant, andmotion for class certification. The judge indicated in late 2021 that the plaintiffs have appealed that decision.may submit rebuttal expert reports, which will likely result in additional discovery and refiling of a new briefing on class certification. This will likely delay the court’s decision on class certification. FCX continues to vigorously defend this matter.


As a result of off-site soil sampling in public and private areas near the former Carteret smelter, FCX increased its associated environmental obligation for known and potential off-site environmental remediation by recording a $59 million charge to operating income in 2017. Additional sampling and analysis occurred through 2018 and is ongoing and could result in additional adjustments to the related environmental remediation obligation in future periods.

Uranium Mining Sites. During a period between 1940 and the early 1970s,1980s, certain FCX subsidiaries and their predecessors were involved in uranium exploration and mining in the western U.S., primarily on federal and tribal lands in the Four Corners region of the southwest. Similar exploration and mining activities by other companies have also caused environmental impacts warranting remediation. In January 2017, the Department of Justice, EPA, Navajo Nation, and two FCX subsidiaries reached an agreement regarding the financial contribution of the U.S. Government and the FCX subsidiaries and the scope of the environmental investigation and remediation work for 94 former uranium mining sites on tribal lands. The settlementUnder the terms are outlined in aof the Consent Decree that was filed on January 17,executed in May 2017, inand approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. Under the Consent Decree, which the U.S. Government valued at over $600 million,Arizona, the U.S. contributed $335 million into a trust fund to cover the government’s initial share of the costs, and FCX’s subsidiaries are proceeding with the environmental investigation and remediation work at the 94 sites. The program is expected to take more than 20 years to complete. Based on updated cash flow and timing estimates,In 2020, FCX reduced its associated obligation by recordingand recorded a $41$47 million credit to operating income in 2017 after receiving court approvalto reflect the discounting effect of the Consent Decree. In additionrecent and expected pace of project work under post-COVID-19 pandemic conditions. By letter dated September 29, 2021, EPA also informed an FCX subsidiary that it does not expect to uranium activities on tribal lands,have funds sufficient to remediate sites covered by a bankruptcy settlement with Tronox and EPA considers a subsidiary of FCX to be potentially liable for 23 of these sites. FCX is also conducting site surveys of historical uranium mining claims associated with FCX subsidiaries on non-tribal federal lands in the Four Corners region. Under a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), site surveys are being performed on over 10,000approximately 15,000 mining claims, ranging from undisturbed claims to claims with mining features. Based on these surveys, BLM may providehas issued no further action determinations for certain undisturbed claimsclaims. A similar agreement is in place with the U.S. Forest Service for mine features on U.S. Forest Service land. Either BLM or requests forthe U.S Forest Service may request additional assessment or reclamationremediation activities for others.other claims with mining features. FCX will update this obligation when it has a sufficient number of remedy decisions from the BLM or the U.S Forest Service to support a reasonably certain range of outcomes. FCX expects it will take several years to complete this work.


AROs. FCX’s ARO estimates are reflected on a third-party cost basis and are based on FCX’s legal obligation to retire tangible, long-lived assets. A summary of changes in FCX’s AROs for the years ended December 31 follows:
 202120202019
Balance at beginning of year$2,472 $2,505 $2,547 
Liabilities incurred20 
Settlements and revisions to cash flow estimates, net331 a(13)(5)
Accretion expense112 131 118 
Dispositions— 

(2)(5)
Spending(201)(156)(170)
Balance at end of year2,716 2,472 2,505 
Less current portion(200)(268)(330)
Long-term portion$2,516 $2,204 $2,175 
 2018 2017 2016 
Balance at beginning of year$2,583
 $2,638
 $2,774
 
Liabilities incurred1
 14
 12
 
Settlements and revisions to cash flow estimates, net50
 (112) 529
a 
Accretion expense110
 124
 137
 
Dispositionsb
(37)
(10) (626) 
Spending(160) (71) (188) 
Balance at end of year2,547
 2,583
 2,638
 
Less current portion(317) (286) (240) 
Long-term portion$2,230
 $2,297
 $2,398
 
a.Revisions to cash flow estimates were primarily related to revised estimates for an overburden stockpile in Indonesia and at certain oil and gas properties.
b.Primarily reflects the sale of certain oil and gas properties.

a.Includes an adjustment at PT-FI totaling $397 million, see further discussion below.


ARO costs may increase or decrease significantly in the future as a result of changes in regulations, changes in engineering designs and technology, permit modifications or updates, changes in mine plans, settlements, inflation or other factors and as reclamation (concurrent with mining operations or post mining) spending occurs. ARO activities and expenditures for mining operations generally are made over an extended period of time commencing near the end of the mine life; however, certain reclamation activities may be accelerated if legally required or if
149

determined to be economically beneficial. The methods used or required to plug and abandon non-producing oil and gas wellbores; remove platforms, tanks, production equipment and flow lines; and restore wellsites could change over time.


Financial Assurance. New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado and other states, as well as federal regulations governing mine operations on federal land, require financial assurance to be provided for the estimated costs of mine reclamation and closure, including groundwater quality protection programs. FCX has satisfied financial assurance requirements by using a variety of mechanisms, primarily involving parent company performance guarantees and financial capability demonstrations, but also including trust funds, surety bonds, letters of credit and other collateral. The applicable regulations specify financial strength tests that are designed to confirm a company’s or guarantor’s financial capability to fund estimated reclamation and closure costs. The amount of financial assurance FCX subsidiaries are required to provide will vary with changes in laws, regulations, reclamation and closure requirements, and cost estimates. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX’s financial assurance obligations associated with these U.S. mine closure and reclamation/restoration costs totaled $1.2$1.5 billion, of which $703 million$0.9 billion was in the form of guarantees issued by FCX and FMC. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had trust assets totaling $180$208 million (included in other assets), which are legally restricted to be used to satisfy its financial assurance obligations for its mining properties in New Mexico. In addition, FCX subsidiaries have financial assurance obligations for its oil and gas properties associated with plugging and abandoning wells and facilities totaling $545$424 million. Where oil and gas guarantees associated with the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management do not include a stated cap, the amounts reflect management’s estimates of the potential exposure.


New Mexico Environmental and Reclamation Programs. FCX’s New Mexico operations are regulated under the New Mexico Water Quality Act and regulations adopted by the Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC).Commission. In connection with discharge permits, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) has required each of these operations to submit closure plans for NMED’s approval. The closure plans must include measures to assure meeting applicable groundwater quality standards following the closure of discharging facilities and to abate groundwater or surface water contamination to meet applicable standards. In 2013, the WQCC adopted Supplemental Permitting Requirements for Copper Mining Facilities, which became effective on December 1, 2013, and specify closure requirements for copper mine facilities. The rules were adopted after an extensive stakeholder process in which FCX participated and were jointly supported by FCX and NMED. The New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the rules in 2018, following a challenge by certain environmental organizations and the New Mexico Attorney General. Finalized closure plans that meet the requirements of these rules will be submitted in 2019 and will result in material increases in closure costs for FCX’s New Mexico operations.

FCX’s New Mexico operations also are subject to regulation under the 1993 New Mexico Mining Act (the Mining Act) and the related rules that are administered by the Mining and Minerals Division (MMD) of the New Mexico Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department. Under the Mining Act, mines are required to obtain approval of plans describingreclamation plans. In 2020, the reclamationagencies approved updates to be performed following cessation of mining operations.the closure plan and financial assurance instruments and completed a permit renewal for Chino. In 2021, the agencies approved updates to the closure plan and financial assurance instruments, and completed a permit renewal for Tyrone. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $450$510 million for its New Mexico operations. Additional accruals may be required based on the state’s periodic review of FCX’s updated closure plans and any resulting permit conditions, and the amount of those accruals could be material.


Arizona Environmental and Reclamation Programs. FCX’s Arizona propertiesoperations are subject to regulatory oversight in several areas.by the ADEQ. ADEQ has adopted regulations for its aquifer protection permit (APP) program that require permits for, among other things, certain facilities, activities and structures used for mining, leaching, concentrating and smelting, and require compliance with aquifer water quality standards at an applicable point of compliance well or location during both operations and closure. The APP program also may require mitigation and discharge reduction or elimination of some discharges.

An application for an APP requires a proposed closure strategy that will meet applicable groundwater protection requirements following cessation of operations and an estimate of the implementation cost, to implement the closure strategy. An APP application specifies closure obligations, including post-closure monitoring and maintenance. Awith a more detailed closure plan must be submitted within 90 days after a permitted entity notifies ADEQ of its intent to cease operations.required at the time operations cease. A permit applicant must demonstrate its financial ability to meet the closure costs approved by ADEQ. In

2014, the state enacted legislation requiring closureClosure costs for facilities covered by APPs are required to be updated no more frequently than every six years and financial assurance mechanisms are required to be updated no more frequently than every two years. In 2016, ADEQ approved aMorenci’s APP requires updated stockpile reclamation plans in 2022, which are expected to result in increased closure costs. Bagdad’s APP also requires an updated cost estimate for its closure plan update for Sierrita,in 2022, which resultedis expected to result in increased closure costs. FCX will continue updating its closure strategy and closure cost estimates at other Arizona sites and intends to submit an updated tailings dam system closure cost for Morenci in April 2019. FCX expectsBagdad according to update the closure strategy and closure costs for Morenci’s stockpiles in 2020. FCX intendsa schedule to update Bagdad closure costs in 2021. FCX has also proposed a closure strategy and closure costs for a former leach stockpile at Bisbee (a discontinued operation), which is currently under reviewbe determined by ADEQ.


Portions of Arizona mining facilities that operated after January 1, 1986, also are subject to the Arizona Mined Land Reclamation Act (AMLRA). AMLRA requires reclamation to achieve stability and safety consistent with post-mining land use objectives specified in a reclamation plan. Reclamation plans must be approved by the State Mine Inspector and must include an estimate of the cost to perform the reclamation measures specified in the plan along with financial assurance. During 2017, Safford submitted an update to its reclamation plan to include the Lone Star expansion, which increased its reclamation costs. FCX will continue to evaluate options for future reclamation and closure activities at its operating and non-operating sites, which are likely to result in adjustments to FCX’s AROs, and those adjustments
150

could be material. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $367$363 million for its Arizona operations.


Colorado Reclamation Programs. FCX’s Colorado operations are regulated by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act (Reclamation Act) and regulations promulgated thereunder. Under the Reclamation Act, mines are required to obtain approval of plans for reclamation of lands affected by mining operations to be performed during mining or upon cessation of mining operations. During 2016, atIn March 2020, the request of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, &and Safety the Climax mine submitted a revised cost estimate for(DRMS) approved Henderson’s proposed update to its current reclamation plan, which did not materially change the closure plan cost. In 2017, Henderson began considering alternatives for theand closure of the tailings facility and, in 2018, began evaluating potential options for long-term water treatment, which are likely to result in adjustments to FCX’s AROs, and those adjustments could be material.cost estimate. As of December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $61$153 million for its Colorado operations.

In 2019, a bill has been introduced in the Colorado legislatureenacted legislation that requires financial assuranceproof of an end date for water treatment as a condition of permit authorizations for new mining operations and expansions beyond current permit authorizations. While this requirement does not apply to existing operations, it may lead to changes in long-term water management and eliminates the potential for future permits for mining sites that include long-term water management as part of the closure strategy. The long-term water management component of the bill will apply torequirements at Climax and Henderson operations and AROs. In accordance with its permit from DRMS, Climax will submit an updated reclamation plan and cost estimate in 2024.


ChileanChile Reclamation and Closure Programs. In July 2011,El Abra is subject to regulation under the Chilean senate passed legislation regulating mine closure, which established new requirements for closure plans.Mine Closure Law administered by the Chile Mining and Geology Agency. In compliance with the requirement for five-year updates, in November 2018, FCX’s El Abra operation submitted an updated plan with closure cost estimates based on the existing approved closure plan. Approval is expectedof the updated closure plan and cost estimates was received in 2019. This update willAugust 2020, and did not result in a material increase to closure costs. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $63$82 million for its El Abra operation.


PeruvianPeru Reclamation and Closure Programs. Cerro Verde is subject to regulation under the Mine Closure Law administered by the PeruvianPeru Ministry of Energy and Mines. Under the closure regulations, mines must submit a closure plan that includes the reclamation methods, closure cost estimates, methods of control and verification, closure and post-closure plans, and financial assurance. In compliance with the five year closure plan and cost update required by the Mine Closure Law, the latestrequirement for five-year updates, in 2017 Cerro Verde submitted its closure plan and cost estimate updated for the Cerro Verde mine expansion, were submitted to the Peruvian regulatory authorities in 2017 andwhich was approved in February 2018. This update did not result in a material increase to closure costs. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $105$141 million for its Cerro Verde operation.


IndonesianIndonesia Reclamation and Closure Programs. The ultimate amount of reclamation and closure costs to be incurred at PT-FI’s operations will be determined based on applicable laws and regulations and PT-FI’s assessment of appropriate remedial activities inunder the circumstances, after consultation with governmental authorities, affected local residents and other affected parties and cannot currently be projected with precision. Some reclamation costs will be incurred during mining activities, while the remaining reclamation costs will be incurred at the end of mining activities, which are currently estimated to continue through 2041. AtThe construction time frame for reclamation of the end of 2016, PT-FI revised its estimates for anWest Wanagon overburden stockpile has been extended from 2025 to address ongoing erosion that occurred during 2016, a design change that increased the volume2029 because safety constraints for working in steep and updated cost estimates reflecting more recent productivitydifficult terrain has reduced labor and costs at the overburden stockpile, whichequipment operating efficiencies. The time frame extension resulted in longer and escalating fixed costs, combined with additional anticipated volumes of stockpile material to be moved. As a result of the change in estimated costs, an increaseARO adjustment of $397 million was recorded in 2021, with $340 million charged to production and delivery costs, as it relates to the ARO of $372 million.depleted Grasberg open pit. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX had accrued reclamation and closure costs of $991 million$1.1 billion for its PT-FI operations. PT-FI is currently mining

Indonesia government regulations issued in the final phase of the Grasberg

open pit and expects to transition to the underground mine in the first half of 2019. As a result, beginning in 2019, any adjustments to the costs for the overburden stockpile will impact earnings.

In December 2009, PT-FI submitted its revised mine closure plan to the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources for review and addressed comments received during the course of this review process. In December 2010 the Indonesian government issued a regulation regarding mine reclamation and closure, which requiresrequire a company to provide a mine closure guarantee in the form of a time deposit placed in a state-owned bank in Indonesia. In December 2018, PT-FI, in conjunction with the issuance of the IUPK,its special mining license (IUPK), submitted a revised mine closure plan to Indonesia’s Department of Energy and Mineral Resources to reflect the extension of operations to 2041. At December 31, 2018,2021, PT-FI funded $90 million into ahad restricted time deposit accountdeposits totaling $113 million for mine closure guarantees and $11 million for reclamation guarantees.


In October 2017, Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry (the MOEF) notified PT-FI of administrative sanctions related to certain activities the MOEF indicated are not reflected in its environmental permit. The MOEF also notified PT-FI that certain operational activities were inconsistent with factors set forth in its environmental permitting studies and that additional monitoring and improvements need to be undertaken related to air quality, water drainage, treatment and handling of certain wastes, and tailings management. In December 2018, the MOEF issued a revised environmental permit to PT-FI to address many of the operational activities that it alleged were inconsistent with earlier studies. The remaining administrative sanctions are being resolved through adoption of revised practices and, in a few situations, PT-FI has agreed with the MOEF on an appropriate multi-year work plan, including the closure of an overburden stockpile.

PT-FI and the MOEF also established a new framework for continuous improvement in environmental practices in PT-FI’s operations, including initiatives that PT-FI will pursue to increase tailings retention and to evaluate large-scale beneficial uses of tailings within Indonesia. The MOEF issued a new decree that incorporates various initiatives and studies to be completed by PT-FI that would target continuous improvement in a manner that would not impose new technical risks or significant long-term costs to PT-FI’s operations. The new framework enables PT-FI to maintain compliance with site-specific standards and provides for ongoing monitoring by the MOEF. In 2018, PT-FI recorded a $32 million charge for assessments of prior period permit fees with the MOEF.

Oil and Gas Properties. Substantially all of FM O&G’s oil and gas leases require that, upon termination of economic production, the working interest owners plug and abandon non-producing wellbores, remove equipment and facilities from leased acreage, and restore land in accordance with applicable local, state and federal laws. Following several sales transactions, in 2016, 2017 and 2018, FM O&G’s remaining operating areas primarily include offshore California and onshore in South Louisiana asthe Gulf of Mexico (GOM). As of December 31, 2018.2021, FM O&G AROs cover approximately 210135 wells and 120approximately 100 platforms and other structures. At December 31, 2018, FM O&Gstructures and it had accrued $476 million associated with its AROs.reclamation and closure costs of $337 million.


151

Litigation. FCX is involved in numerousIn addition to the material pending legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business ordiscussed below and above under “Environmental,” we are associated with environmental issues as discussed in this note under “Environmental.” FCX is also involved periodically in reviews, inquiries, investigationsordinary routine litigation incidental to our business and other proceedings initiated by or involving government agencies,not required to be disclosed, some of which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. SEC regulations require us to disclose environmental proceedings involving a governmental authority if we reasonably believe that such proceedings may result in monetary sanctions above a stated threshold. Pursuant to the SEC regulations, we use a threshold of $1 million for purposes of determining whether disclosure of any such environmental proceedings is required. Management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of any current pending legal proceeding will have a material adverse effect on FCX’s financial condition, although individual or cumulative outcomes could be material to FCX’s operating results for a particular period, depending on the nature and magnitude of the outcome and the operating results for the period.


FM O&G LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiaryLouisiana Parishes Coastal Erosion Cases. Certain FCX affiliates were named as defendants, along with numerous co-defendants, in 13 cases out of a total of 42 cases filed in Louisiana state courts by six south Louisiana parishes (Cameron, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. John the Baptist and Vermilion), alleging that certain oil and gas exploration and production operations and sulfur mining and production operations in coastal Louisiana contaminated and damaged coastal wetlands and caused significant land loss along the Louisiana coast. The state of Louisiana, through the Attorney General and separately through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, intervened in the litigation in support of the parishes’ claims. Specifically, the cases alleged the defendants failed to obtain and/or comply with required coastal use permits in violation of the Louisiana State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978, and sought unspecified damages for the alleged statutory violations, and restoration of the properties at issue to their original condition. Certain FCX affiliates were named as defendants in two of the five cases that had been set for trial, both originally filed on November 8, 2013: Parish of Plaquemines v. ConocoPhillips Company et al., 25th Judicial District Court, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; No. 60-982, Div. B and Parish of Plaquemines v. Hilcorp Energy Company et al., 25th Judicial District Court, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; No. 60-999, Div. B. In 2019, affiliates of FCX isreached an agreement in principle to settle all 13 cases. The maximum out-of-pocket settlement payment will be $23.5 million with the initial payment of $15 million to be paid upon execution of the settlement agreement. The initial payment will be held in trust and later deposited into a defendantnewly formed Coastal Zone Recovery Fund (the Fund) if the state of Louisiana passes enabling legislation to establish the Fund. The settlement agreement will also require the FCX affiliates to pay into the Fund twenty annual installments of $4.25 million beginning in 2023 provided the state of Louisiana passes the enabling legislation. The first two of those annual installments are conditioned only on the enactment of the enabling legislation within three years of execution of the settlement agreement, but all subsequent installments are also conditioned on the FCX affiliates receiving simultaneous reimbursement on a purported class action titled David Garcia v. Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC filed on April 1, 2016,dollar-for-dollar basis from the proceeds of environmental credit sales generated by the Fund, resulting in the Superior Court$23.5 million maximum total payment obligation. The settlement agreement must be executed by all parties, including authorized representatives of the Statesix south Louisiana parishes originally plaintiffs in the suit and certain other non-plaintiff Louisiana parishes and the state of CaliforniaLouisiana. The agreement in principle does not include any admission of liability by FCX or its affiliates. FCX recorded a charge in 2019 for the Countyinitial payment of Santa Barbara (Case No. 16CV01305) and subsequently removed to$15 million, which will be paid upon execution of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the District Court).settlement agreement. The plaintiff, a former FM O&G LLC employee who worked on offshore production platforms in federal waters, alleged violations of various California wage and hour laws and sought relief for past wages, overtime, penalties, interest and attorney’s fees. The case was dismissedsettlement agreement has been executed by the District Court onFCX affiliates, several of the basis that federal law, not state law, applied,Louisiana parishes, and the complaint alleged no violationsstate of federal law. The dismissal was appealedLouisiana. FCX is continuing its efforts to obtain signatures from or on behalf of the remaining parishes to finalize the settlement. Upon execution of the settlement agreement by all parties, the plaintiff to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit where the case is currently stayed in deference to the ongoing appeal of a similar case. Based on recent developments, FCX has concluded that its exposure in the Garcia case is not material to its consolidated financial statements.affiliates will be fully released and dismissed from all 13 pending cases.



Asbestos and Talc Claims.Claims. Since approximately 1990, various FCX affiliates have been named as defendants in a large number of lawsuits alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos or talc allegedly contained in industrial products such as electrical wire and cable, raw materials such as paint and joint compounds, talc-based lubricants used in rubber manufacturing or from asbestos contained in buildings and facilities located at properties owned or operated by affiliates of FCX. Many of these suits involve a large number of codefendants. Based on litigation results to date and facts currently known, FCX believes there is a reasonable possibility that losses may have been incurred related to these matters; however, FCX also believes that the amounts of any such losses, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to its consolidated financial statements. There can be no assurance that future developments will not alter this conclusion.


There has been a recent significant increase in the number of cases alleging the presence of asbestos contamination in talc-based cosmetic and personal care products and in cases alleging exposure to talc products that are not alleged to be contaminated with asbestos. In these cases, plaintiffs allege serious health risks and often fatal diseases, including mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, allegedly caused by long-term use of talc-based cosmetic and personal care products. Nationwide trial results in these cases have ranged from outright dismissals to large jury awards of both compensatory and punitive damages. The primary targets have been the producers of those products, but defendants in many of these cases also include talc miners. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (CAMC), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of FCX, is one of those targets. One of CAMC’s wholly owned subsidiaries,and Cyprus Mines Corporation (Cyprus Mines), a wholly owned subsidiary of CAMC, are among those targets. Cyprus Mines was involvedengaged in talc mining and processing from 1964 until 1992 when it exited
152

its talc business by conveying it to a third party in two related transactions. Those transactions involved (1) a transfer by Cyprus Mines of the assets of its talc business to a newly formed subsidiary that business.assumed all pre-sale and post-sale talc liabilities, subject to limited reservations, and (2) a sale of the stock of that subsidiary to the third party. In 2011, the third party sold that subsidiary to Imerys Talc America (Imerys), an affiliate of Imerys S.A. In accordance with the terms of the 1992 transactions and subsequent agreements, Imerys undertook the defense and indemnification of Cyprus Mines and CAMC in talc lawsuits.

Cyprus Mines has contractual indemnification rights, subject to limited reservations, against the ultimate successor to the business,Imerys, which has historically acknowledged those indemnification obligations and has takentook responsibility for all cases tendered to it to date.it. However, onin February 13, 2019, the indemnitorImerys filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, which triggered an immediate automatic stay under the federal bankruptcy code prohibiting any party from continuing or initiating litigation or asserting new claims against Imerys. As a result, Imerys stopped defending the talc lawsuits against Cyprus Mines and CAMC. In addition, Imerys took the position that it alone owns, and has the sole right to access, the proceeds of the legacy insurance coverage of Cyprus Mines and CAMC for talc liabilities. In March 2019, Cyprus Mines and CAMC challenged this position and obtained emergency relief from the bankruptcy court to gain access to the insurance until the question of ownership and contractual access could be decided in an adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court, which is incurrently on hold.

On December 22, 2020, Imerys filed an amended bankruptcy plan disclosing a global settlement with Cyprus Mines and CAMC, which provides a framework for a full and comprehensive resolution of all current and future potential liabilities arising out of the very early stages of evaluating the potential implications of that filing. To date, no judgments have been renderedCyprus Mines talc business, including claims against FCX, its affiliates, Cyprus Mines, and CAMC.

In 2021, Imerys obtained an injunction temporarily staying approximately 950 talc-related lawsuits against CAMC and FCX believes that CAMCCyprus Mines, which has strong defenses. Accordingly, FCX currently believesbeen extended through June 2022. The interim stay is a component of the losses, if any, related to these cases, individually or in the aggregate, are not material to its consolidated financial statements. Thereglobal settlement but there can be no assurance that the bankruptcy court will continue to impose the interim stay.

On January 23, 2021, Imerys filed the form of a settlement and release agreement to be entered into by CAMC, Cyprus Mines, FCX, Imerys and the other debtors, tort claimants’ committee and future developmentsclaims representative in the Imerys bankruptcy. In accordance with the global settlement, among other things, (1) CAMC will not alter this conclusion.pay a total of $130 million in cash to a settlement trust in seven annual installments, which will be guaranteed by FCX; (2) CAMC and Cyprus Mines and their affiliates will contribute to the settlement trust all rights that they have to the proceeds of certain legacy insurance policies as well as indemnity rights they have against Johnson & Johnson, and (3) Cyprus Mines will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with CAMC paying expenses of Cyprus Mines’ bankruptcy process, subject to certain limitations. On February 11, 2021, Cyprus Mines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In connection with executing the settlement and release agreement, FCX concluded that it has a probable loss and, in 2020, recorded a $130 million charge to environmental obligations and shutdown costs.


In October 2021, Johnson & Johnson announced it established a new subsidiary to hold and manage its cosmetic talc liabilities, which entity subsequently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This filing could further slow and complicate FCX’s efforts to implement a resolution.

FCX’s global settlement is subject to, among other things, votes by claimants in both the Imerys and Cyprus Mines bankruptcy cases as well as bankruptcy court approvals in both cases, and there can be no assurance that the global settlement will be successfully implemented. FCX has a $130 million liability balance at December 31, 2021, associated with the proposed settlement.

Tax and Other Matters. FCX’s operations are in multiple jurisdictions where uncertainties arise in the application of complex tax regulations. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, while others are defined by general tax laws and regulations. FCX and its subsidiaries are subject to reviews of its income tax filings and other tax payments, and disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation of its contracts or laws. The final taxes paid may be dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities. In certain jurisdictions, FCX must paypays a portion of the disputed amount to the local government in order tobefore formally appeal theappealing an assessment. Such payment is recorded as a receivable if FCX believes the amount is collectible.


Cerro Verde Royalty Dispute. SUNAT has assessed mining royalties on ore processed by the Cerro Verde concentrator which commenced operations in late 2006, for the period from December 2006 to December 2013. No royalty assessments can be issued for the years after 2013, as Cerro Verde hasbegan paying royalties on all of its production in January 2014 under its new 15-year stability
153

agreement. Cerro Verde contested each of these assessments because it believes that its 1998 stability agreement exempts from royalties all minerals extracted from its mining concession, irrespective of the method used for processing such minerals. No assessments can be issued for years after 2013, as Cerro Verde began paying royalties on all of its production in January 2014 under its new 15-year stability agreement.

Since 2014, Cerro Verde has been paying under protest the disputed assessments for the period from December 2006 through December 2008mostly under an installment program ($188 million paid by Cerro Verde through December 31, 2018). Cerro Verde will also begin making monthly payments beginning in second-quarter 2019 under a 66-month payment plan related to assessments for the period January 2009 through September 2011.

In October 2017, the Peruvian Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of SUNAT that the assessments of royalties for the year 2008 on ore processed by the Cerro Verde concentrator were properprograms provided under Peruvian law. As a result of the unfavorable Peruvian Supreme Court ruling,During 2021, Cerro Verde recorded net chargesmade payments totaling $421 million, which was the balance of $186 million in 2017 (consisting of pre-tax charges of $348 million and $7 million of net tax charges, net of $169 million of noncontrolling interests) primarily for royalty assessments for the period December 2006 through the year 2013, penalties and interest related to assessments for the period December 2006 through the year 2008, and other related items that Cerro Verde would have incurred under the view that its concentrator was not stabilized.


In September 2018, the Peruvian Tax Tribunal denied Cerro Verde’s request to waive penalties and interest for the period January 2009 through September 2011. In December 2018, Cerro Verde elected not to appeal the Peruvian Tax Tribunal’s decisions and is continuing to evaluate alternative strategies to defend its rights, including international arbitration. As a result, Cerro Verde recorded net charges of $211 million in 2018 (consisting of pre-tax charges of $420 million, net of $18 million of tax benefits and $191 million of noncontrolling interests) primarily for penalties and interest related to assessments for the years 2009 through 2013 and other related items.

Cerro Verde also recognized a net gain of $16 million (consisting of pre-tax gains of $14 million and net tax benefits of $17 million, net of $15 million in noncontrolling interests) in 2018 for refunds received for the overpayment of special (voluntary) levies (GEM) for the period October 2012 through the year 2013. Cerro Verde has also submitted a refund request for the remainder of the GEM assessments for the period October 2011 through September 2012 totaling $57 million, but will not record a receivable for this amount until the request is granted by SUNAT.

As of December 31, 2018, Cerro Verde has recorded all of its exposure associated with its royalty dispute with the Peruvian tax authoritiesliabilities.

On February 28, 2020, FCX filed on its own behalf and will continue to record interest charges until all obligations are settled. Any future recoveries would be recorded when collected.

A summaryon behalf of the charges recorded in 2018 and 2017 for the Cerro Verde royalty dispute follows:international arbitration proceedings against the Government of Peru under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The hearing on the merits is scheduled to take place in May 2023. In April 2020, SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands B.V., another shareholder of Cerro Verde, filed another international arbitration proceeding against the Government of Peru under the Netherlands-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty. The hearing on the merits is scheduled to take place in February 2023.
Royalty and related assessment charges: 
2018a
 2017 Total 
 Production and delivery $14
 $203
b 
$217
 
 Interest expense, net 370
 145
 515
 
 Other expense 22
 
 22
 
 (Benefit from) provision for income taxes (35) 7
c 
(28) 
    Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (176) (169) (345) 
   $195
 $186
 $381
 
a.Amounts are net of gains from the refund of GEM for the period October 2012 through the year 2013.
b.Includes $175 million related to disputed royalty assessments for the period from December 2006 to September 2011 (when royalties were determined based on revenues).
c.Includes tax charges of $136 million for disputed royalties ($69 million) and other related mining taxes ($67 million) for the period October 2011 through the year 2013 when royalties were determined based on operating income, mostly offset by a tax benefit of $129 million associated with disputed royalties and other related mining taxes for the period December 2006 through December 2013.

Other PeruvianPeru Tax Matters. Cerro Verde has also received assessments from SUNAT for additional taxes, penalties and interest related to various audit exceptions for income and other taxes. Cerro Verde has filed or will file objections to the assessments because it believes it has properly determined and paid its taxes. A summary of these assessments follows:
Tax YearTax AssessmentPenalties and InterestTotal
2003 to 2008$48 $130 $178 
200956 52 108 
201054 122 176 
2011 and 201241 72 113 
201348 65 113 
2014 to 201628 33 
$252 $469 $721 
Tax Year Tax Assessment Penalty and Interest Assessment Total 
2003 to 2008 $56
 $130
 $186
 
2009 57
 51
 108
 
2010 63
 105
 168
 
2011 49
 65
 114
 
2014 to 2018 32
 
 32
 
  $257
 $351
 $608
 


As of December 31, 2018,2021, Cerro Verde had paid $386$642 million on these disputed tax assessments. A reserve has been applied against these payments totaling $203$405 million, resulting in a net receivable of $183$237 million(included in other assets), which Cerro Verde believes is collectible.



Cerro Verde’s income tax assessments, penalties and interest included in the table above totaled $0.6 billion at December 31, 2021, of which $0.3 billion has not been recorded.

Indonesia Tax Matters.PT-FI has received assessments from the IndonesianIndonesia tax authorities for additional taxes and interest related to various audit exceptions for income and other taxes. PT-FI has filed objections to the assessments because it believes it has properly determined and paid its taxes. Excluding surface water and withholding tax assessments discussed below and the IndonesianIndonesia government’s previous imposition of a 7.5 percent export duty that PT-FI paid under protest during the period April 2017 to December 21, 2018 (refer to Note 13), a summary of these assessments, including potential penalties follows:
Tax YearTax AssessmentPenalties and InterestTotal
2005$62 $30 $92 
200748 23 71 
2008 and 201128 36 64 
2012 and 201341 43 84 
2014 and 2015121 — 121 
2016257 483 740 
2017 and 201948 47 95 
$605 $662 $1,267 
Tax Year Tax Assessment Interest Assessment Total
2005 $73
 $35
 $108
2007 47
 23
 70
2008, 2010 to 2011 55
 37
 92
2012 124
 
 124
2013 154
 74
 228
2014 139
 6
 145
2015 158
 
 158
2016 266
 113
 379
  $1,016
 $288
 $1,304


As of December 31, 2018,2021, PT-FI had paid $493$278 million on these disputed tax assessments. A reserve has been applied against these payments totaling $221 million, resulting in a net receivable of $57 million (included in other assets) on disputed.

PT-FI’s income tax assessments, penalties and interest included in the table above totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2021, of which it believes is collectible.$0.5 billion has not been recorded.

154

Surface Water Taxes. PT-FI received assessments from the local regional tax authority in Papua, Indonesia, for additional taxes and penalties related to surface water taxes for the period from January 2011 through December 2018. As a result, PT-FI has filed or will file appeals ofoffered to pay 1000000000000 rupiah to settle these assessments with the Indonesia Tax Court. During the first half of 2018 and in fourth-quarter 2018, the Indonesia Tax Court ruled partially in favor of PT-FI with respect to assessments for the period January 2016 through April 2017 by reducing these assessments from $80 million, including penalties, to $48 million, including penalties (based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2018), or an approximate 40 percent reduction.

During 2017, PT-FI filed reconsideration request petitions to the Indonesia Supreme Court with respect to assessments for the period from January 2011 through December 2015; and in second-quarter 2018, filed reconsideration request petitions with respect to the Indonesia Tax Court decisions related to the assessments for the period from January 2016 through April 2016. In second-quarter 2018, the Indonesia Supreme Court issued favorable decisions relating tohistorical surface water tax assessments for the period January 2011 through July 2015. The Indonesia Supreme Court ruling concluded that PT-FIdisputes and the Indonesian government are bound by PT-FI’s former COW, which is lex specialis, and prevails as the law for the parties to the former COW that should be carried out in good faith. As a result, FCX estimates the total amount of the assessments, including penalties, (based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2018) for the period from August 2015 through December 2018 totals $174charged $69 million including $87 million in penalties. In accordance with its IUPK discussed in Note 13, PT-FI is obligated to pay surface water taxes of $15 million annually, beginning in 2019. In addition, PT-FI has offered to pay one trillion rupiah ($69 million based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2018) to settle historical disputes regarding surface water taxes, which was charged to production and delivery costs in December 2018.

In September 2018,May 2019, PT-FI receivedagreed to a final settlement of 1.394 trillion rupiah (approximately $99 million) and recorded an unfavorable decision from the Indonesian Tax Court with respect to its appealincremental charge of disallowed items on its 2012 corporate income tax return. The most significant disallowed item relates to the tax treatment of mine development costs. A similar decision on PT-FI’s 2014 corporate income tax return was announced$28 million. PT-FI paid 708.5 billion rupiah ($50 million) in October 2018. PT-FI has filed or will file appeals related to these decisions to the Indonesian Supreme Court because it believes the former COW is explicit about the tax treatment associated with mine development costs. No adjustments have been recorded for this matter as of December 31, 2018, because FCX believes PT-FI has properly determined2019, and paid its taxes. Asthe balance of December 31, 2018, PT-FI had long-term receivables totaling approximately $350 million related to this matter, and no reserves have been recorded for these receivables. FCX estimates the potential exposure for penalties for the years 2013, 2016 and 2017, in which the Indonesian tax authorities may assert that PT-FI has underpaid income taxes, totals $251 million based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2018.685.5 billion rupiah ($48 million) during 2021.



Export Duty Matter. In April 2017, PT-FI entered into a memorandum of understanding with the IndonesianIndonesia government (the 2017 MOU) confirming that the former COWcontract of work (COW) would continue to be valid and honored until replaced by a mutually agreed IUPK and investment stability agreement. In the 2017 MOU, PT-FIagreement and agreed to continue to pay aexport duties of 5 percent on copper concentrate export duty during this period.sales until completion of the divestment and new IUPK. Subsequently, the Customs Office of the Minister of Finance refused to recognize the 5 percent export duty agreed to under the 2017 MOU and imposed a 7.5 percent export duty under the Ministry of Finance regulations, whichregulations. PT-FI paid $155 million for these duties under protest duringand appealed the period April 2017disputed amounts to December 21, 2018. PT-FI is disputing the incremental 2.5 percent export duty while the matter is pending inIndonesia Tax Court. The Indonesia Tax Court proceedings, and amounts paid are being held in a restricted cash account or in a current or long-term receivable in the consolidated balance sheets ($144 million at December 31, 2018, consisting of $15 millionin income and other tax receivables, $7 million in other current assets and $122 million in other assets; and $38 million at December 31, 2017, consisting of $22 million in other current assets and $16 million in other assets) that PT-FI expects to have released or refunded in full once the matter is resolved. In December 2018, the Indonesia Tax Court announced a rulingsubsequently ruled in favor of PT-FI related to $15the cases involving $29 million of the disputed export duties,amounts, which were refunded by the Indonesia Customs Office to PT-FI. The Indonesia Customs Office appealed the Indonesia Tax Court decisions on these cases to the Indonesia Supreme Court. On October 29, 2019, the Indonesia Supreme Court posted on its website rulings unfavorable to PT-FI expects to collect in 2019. Under the termsfor certain of the IUPK, PT-FI is subjectappealed cases involving approximately half of the $29 million that had been refunded to an export duty until smelter development reaches 50 percent, at which timePT-FI. As a result of the export duty will be eliminated (referOctober 2019 ruling, FCX recorded a charge of $155 million in 2019 to Note 13fully reserve for export duty rates).this matter.


Withholding Tax Assessments. In January 2019, PT-FI noted that the IndonesianIndonesia Supreme Court posted on its website an unfavorable decision related to a PT-FI 2005 withholding tax matter. PT-FI had also received an unfavorable IndonesianIndonesia Supreme Court decision in November 2017 and2017. PT-FI currently has other pending cases at the IndonesianIndonesia Supreme Court related to withholding taxes for employees and other service providers for the year 2005 and the year 2007, which total approximately $61$47 million (based on the exchange rate as of December 31, 2018)2021, and included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021), including penalties and interest.

Smelter Development Progress. As a result of COVID-19 mitigation measures, there have been disruptions to work and travel schedules of international contractors and restrictions on access to the proposed physical site of the greenfield smelter in Gresik, Indonesia. PT-FI continues to discuss with the Indonesia government a deferred schedule for the greenfield smelter in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI’s commitment for the development of additional smelting capacity in Indonesia under the terms of its IUPK.

On January 2019 ruling,7, 2021, the Indonesia government levied an administrative fine of $149 million for the period from March 30, 2020, through September 30, 2020, on PT-FI concludedfor failing to achieve physical development progress on the greenfield smelter as of July 31, 2020. On January 13, 2021, PT-FI responded to the Indonesia government objecting to the fine because of events outside of its control causing a loss on all outstanding withholding tax matters is probable under applicable accounting guidance, and itdelay of the greenfield smelter’s development progress. PT-FI believes that its communications during 2020 with the Indonesia government were not properly considered before the administrative fine was levied.

In June 2021, the Indonesia government issued a ministerial decree for the calculation of an administrative fine for lack of smelter development in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2021, PT-FI recorded charges totaling $16 million for a potential settlement of the administrative fine. On January 25, 2022, the Indonesia government submitted a new estimate of the administrative fine totaling $57 million. On February 15, 2022, PT-FI responded to the Indonesia government with a revised calculation of $37 million. PT-FI expects to record a charge in the first quarter of $61 million2022 for an amount in 2018.excess of the previously recorded $16 million.


Letters of Credit, Bank Guarantees and Surety Bonds.  Letters of credit and bank guarantees totaled$528 $239 million at December 31, 2018,2021, primarily associated with environmental obligations, AROs and for environmental and asset retirement obligations, the Cerro Verde royalty dispute (refercopper concentrate shipments from PT-FI to discussion above), workers’ compensation insurance programs, tax and customs obligations, and other commercial obligations.Atlantic Copper as required by Indonesia regulations. In addition, FCX had surety bonds totaling $342$492 million at December 31, 2018,2021, primarily associated with environmental obligations and asset retirement obligations.AROs.


155


Insurance.  FCX purchases a variety of insurance products to mitigate potential losses, which typically have specified deductible amounts or self-insured retentions and policy limits. FCX generally is self-insured for U.S. workers’ compensation, but purchases excess insurance up to statutory limits. An actuarial analysis is performed twice a year on the various casualty insurance programs covering FCX’s U.S.-based mining operations, including workers’ compensation, to estimate expected losses. At December 31, 2018,2021, FCX’s liability for expected losses under these insurance programs totaled $60$62 million,, which consisted of a current portion of $11$11 million (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities) and a long-term portion of $49$51 million (included in other liabilities). In addition, FCX has receivables of $15$26 million (a current portion of $2$7 million included in other accounts receivable and a long-term portion of $13$19 million included in other assets) for expected claims associated with these losses to be filed with insurance carriers.


FCX’s oil and gas operations are subject to all of the risks normally incidentincidental to the production of oil and gas, including well blowouts, cratering, explosions, oil spills, releases of gas or well fluids, fires, pollution and releases of toxic gas, each of which could result in damage to or destruction of oil and gas wells, production facilities or other property, or injury to persons. While FCX is not fully insured against all risks related to its oil and gas operations, its insurance policies provide limited coverage for losses or liabilities relating to pollution, with broader coverage for sudden and accidental occurrences. FCX is self-insured for named windstorms in the GOM.



NOTE 13.  COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
Operating Leases.Effective January 1, 2019, FCX adopted the new Accounting Standards Update (ASU) for lease accounting, and nearly all of FCX’s leases were considered operating leases under the new ASU. FCX leases various types of properties, including land, offices and equipment. Future minimum rentalsequipment under non-cancelable leases.

The components of FCX’s leases at presented in the consolidated balance sheet for the years ended December 31 2018, total $53follow:
December 31,
20212020
Lease right-of-use assets (included in property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net)
$277 $207 
Short-term lease liabilities (included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities)
$38 $38 
Long-term lease liabilities (included in other liabilities)281 a190 
Total lease liabilities$319 $228 
a.Includes a land lease by PT-FI for the greenfield smelter totaling $126 million. This is FCX’s only significant finance lease.

Operating lease costs, primarily included in production and delivery expense in the consolidated statement of operations, for the two years ended December 31 follow:
202120202019
Operating leases$42 $42 $55 
Variable and short-term leases62 74 79 
Total operating lease costs$104 $116 $134 

FCX payments included in operating cash flows for its lease liabilities totaled $54 million in 2019, $422021, $36 million in 2020 and $38 million in 2021, $322019. FCX payments included in financing cash flows for its lease liabilities totaled $25 million in 2022, $292021 and $4 million in 2023both 2020 and $171 million thereafter. Minimum payments under operating leases have not been reduced by aggregate minimum sublease rentals, which are minimal. Total aggregate rental expense under operating leases was $80 million in 2018, $59 million in 2017 and $71 million 2016.

Contractual Obligations.  At 2019. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the weighted-average discount rate used to determine the lease liabilities was 4.2 percent (5.4 percent as of December 31, 2020) and the weighted-average remaining lease term was 12.4 years (7.7 years as of December 31, 2020).


156

The future minimum payments for leases presented in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021, follow:
2022$46 
202335 
202473 
202527 
202624 
Thereafter194 
Total payments399 
Less amount representing interest(80)
Present value of net minimum lease payments319 
Less current portion(38)
Long-term portion$281 

Contractual Obligations.  At December 31, 2021, based on applicable prices on that date, FCX has unconditional purchase obligations (including take-or-pay contracts with terms less than one year) of $2.9$4.3 billion,, primarily comprising the procurement of copper concentrate ($1.53.1 billion), cobalt ($0.5 billion), electricitytransportation services ($0.4 billion) and transportation services ($electricity ($0.3 billion)billion). Some of FCX’s unconditional purchase obligations are settled based on the prevailing market rate for the service or commodity purchased. In some cases, the amount of the actual obligation may change over time because of market conditions. Obligations for copper concentrate provide for deliveries of specified volumes to Atlantic Copper at market-based prices. ObligationsTransportation obligations are primarily for cobalt hydroxide intermediate provide for deliveries of specified volumes to Freeport Cobalt at market-based prices.South America contracted ocean freight. Electricity obligations are primarily for long-term power purchase agreements in North America and contractual minimum demand at the South America mines. Transportation obligations are primarily for South America contracted ocean freight.


FCX’s unconditional purchase obligations by year total $2.1$1.6 billion in 2019, $234 million in 2020, $147 million in 2021, $50 million in 2022, $44 million$1.5 billion in 2023, $0.5 billion in 2024, $0.2 billion in 2025, $0.2 billion in 2026 and $301 million$0.3 billion thereafter. During the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, FCX fulfilled its minimum contractual purchase obligations.


Special Mining License (IUPK)IUPK - Indonesia. As discussed in Note 2, onOn December 21, 2018, FCX completed the transaction with the IndonesianIndonesia government regarding PT-FI’s long-term mining rights and share ownership. Concurrent with the closing of the transaction, the IndonesianIndonesia government granted PT-FI an IUPK to replace its former COW, enabling PT-FI to conduct operations in the Grasberg minerals district through 2041. Under the terms of the IUPK, PT-FI has been granted an extension of mining rights through 2031, with rights to extend mining rights through 2041, subject to PT-FI completing the constructiondevelopment of a new smelteradditional smelting capacity in Indonesia within five yearsby the end of closing2023 (an extension of which has been requested due to COVID-19 mitigation measures subject to the transactionapproval of the Indonesia government, refer to Note 12), and fulfilling its defined fiscal obligations to the IndonesianIndonesia government. The IUPK, and related documentation, contains legal and fiscal terms and is legally enforceable through 2041.2041, assuming the additional extension is received. In addition, FCX, as a foreign investor, has rights to resolve investment disputes with the IndonesianIndonesia government through international arbitration.


The key fiscal terms set forth in the IUPK include a 25 percent corporate income tax rate, a 10 percent profits tax on net income, and royalty rates of 4 percent for copper, 3.75 percent for gold and 3.25 percent for silver. PT-FI’s royalties totaled $238$319 million in 2018, $1732021, $160 million in 20172020 and $131$106 million in 2016.2019.


Dividend distributions from PT-FI to FCX totaled $1.0 billion in 2021 and are subject to a 10 percent withholding tax. There were no dividend distributions from PT-FI to FCX in 2020 or 2019.

The IUPK also requires PT-FI to pay export duties of 5 percent, declining to 2.5 percent when smelter development progress exceeds 30 percent and eliminated when smelterdevelopment progress for additional smelting capacity in Indonesia exceeds 50 percent. PT-FI had previously agreed to and has been paying export duties since July 2014 (refer to Note 12 for further discussion of disputed export duties for the period April 2017 to December 21, 2018)duties). PT-FI’s export duties charged against revenues totaled $180$218 million in 2018, $1152021, $92 million in 20172020 and $95$66 million in 2016.2019 (excluding $155 million associated with the historical export duty matter discussed in Note 12).


The IUPK also requires PT-FI to pay surface water taxes of $15 million annually, beginningwhich began in 2019.2019 and are recognized in production and delivery costs.


157

In connection with a memorandum of understanding previously entered into with the IndonesianIndonesia government in July 2014, PT-FI provided an assurance bond at that time to support its commitment to construct a newgreenfield smelter in Indonesia ($126132 million based on exchange rate as of December 31, 2018)2021).


In March 2021, PT-FI has applied forreceived a one-year extension of its export license through March 15, 2022. In December 2021, PT Smelting received a twelve-month extension of its anodes slimes export license, which currently expires on February 16, 2019.December 9, 2022, subject to review and approval by the Indonesia government every six months.



Chiyoda Contract. In July 2021, PT-FI awarded a construction contract to Chiyoda for the construction of a greenfield smelter in Gresik, Indonesia with an estimated contract cost of $2.8 billion. During 2021, PT-FI progressed site preparation activities and expects engineering procurement and construction activities to advance during 2022 and 2023. Construction of the greenfield smelter is expected to be completed as soon as feasible in 2024, which is subject to no additional COVID-19-related disruptions and other factors.
Other. In 2016, FCX negotiated
PT-FI Tolling Agreement. PT-FI entered into a tolling agreement with PT Smelting that will be effective January 1, 2023, and will replace the terminationcurrent concentrate sales agreements between PT-FI and settlement of FM O&G’s drilling rig contracts with Noble Drilling (U.S.) LLC (Noble) and Rowan Companies plc (Rowan).PT Smelting. Under the tolling agreement, PT-FI will pay PT Smelting to smelt and refine its concentrate and will retain title to all products for sale to third parties.

Indemnification. The PT-FI divestment agreement, discussed in Note 3, provides that FCX will indemnify PT Inalum and PTI from any losses (reduced by receipts) arising from any tax disputes of PT-FI disclosed to PT Inalum in a Jakarta, Indonesia tax court letter limited to PTI’s respective percentage share at the time the loss is finally incurred. Any net obligations arising from any tax settlement with Noble,would be paid on December 21, 2025. FCX issued 48.1had accrued $78 million sharesas of its common stock (representing a valueDecember 31, 2021, and $42 million as of $540 million) during second-quarter 2016, and Noble immediately sold these shares. UnderDecember 31, 2020, (included in other liabilities in the settlement with Rowan, FCX paid $215 million in cash during 2016. FCX also agreedconsolidated balance sheets) related to provide contingent payments of up to $75 million to Noble and up to $30 million to Rowan, depending on the average price of crude oil over the 12-month period ending June 30, 2017. In January 2017, FCX paid $6 million to early settle a portion of the Rowan contingent payments and no additional payments were due when the contingency period ended on June 30, 2017. As a result of the settlements, FM O&G was released from a total of $1.1 billion in payment obligations under its three drilling rig contracts.this indemnification.


Community Development Programs.  FCX has adopted policies that govern its working relationships with the communities where it operates. These policies are designed to guide its practices and programs in a manner that respects and promotes basic human rights and the culture of the local people impacted by FCX’s operations. FCX continues to make significant expenditures on community development, education, training and cultural programs.


In 1996, PT-FI established the Freeport Partnership Fund for Community Development (Partnership Fund) through which PT-FI has made available funding and technical assistance to support community development initiatives in the areas of health, education, economic development and local infrastructure of the area. Throughout 2019, PT-FI has committed through June 30, 2019,consulted with key stakeholders to provide one percent of its annual revenue forrestructure the developmentmanagement of the local communitiesPartnership Fund in compliance with PT-FI’s IUPK. Throughout the restructuring process, PT-FI continued its areacontributions to ensure no disruptions in implementation of operations throughapproved projects. Beginning in February 2020, the Partnership Fund.Fund is managed by a legally-recognized Indonesia foundation (Yayasan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Amungme dan Kamoro, or YPMAK). PT-FI charged $55$75 million in 2018, $442021, $36 million in 20172020 and $33$28 million in 20162019 to cost of sales for this commitment.


Guarantees.  FCX provides certain financial guarantees (including indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others) and indemnities.


Prior to its acquisition by FCX, FMC and its subsidiaries have, as part of merger, acquisition, divestiture and other transactions, from time to time, indemnified certain sellers, buyers or other parties related to the transaction from and against certain liabilities associated with conditions in existence (or claims associated with actions taken) prior to the closing date of the transaction. As part of these transactions, FMC indemnified the counterparty from and against certain excluded or retained liabilities existing at the time of sale that would otherwise have been transferred to the party at closing. These indemnity provisions generally now require FCX to indemnify the party against certain liabilities that may arise in the future from the pre-closing activities of FMC for assets sold or purchased. The indemnity classifications include environmental, tax and certain operating liabilities, claims or litigation existing at closing and various excluded liabilities or obligations. Most of these indemnity obligations arise from transactions that closed many years ago, and given the nature of these indemnity obligations, it is not possible to estimate the maximum potential exposure. Except as described in the following sentence, FCX does not consider any of such obligations as having a probable likelihood of payment that is reasonably estimable, and accordingly, has not recorded any obligations associated with these indemnities. With respect to FCX’s environmental indemnity obligations, any expected costs from these guarantees are accrued when potential environmental obligations are considered by management to be probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.


158

NOTE 14.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FCX does not purchase, hold or sell derivative financial instruments unless there is an existing asset or obligation, or it anticipates a future activity that is likely to occur and will result in exposure to market risks, which FCX intends to offset or mitigate. FCX does not enter into any derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes, but has entered into derivative financial instruments in limited instances to achieve specific objectives. These objectives principally relate to managing risks associated with commodity price changes, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.


Commodity Contracts.  From time to time, FCX has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the market risk associated with fluctuations in the prices of commodities it purchases and sells. Derivative financial instruments used by FCX to manage its risks do not contain credit risk-related contingent provisions. As a result

In April 2020, FCX entered into forward sales contracts for 150 million pounds of copper for settlement in May and June of 2020. The forward sales provided for fixed pricing of $2.34 per pound of copper on approximately 60 percent of North America's sales volumes for May and June 2020. These contracts resulted in hedging losses totaling $24 million for the acquisition of the oil and gas business in 2013, FCX assumed a variety of crude oil and natural gas commodity derivatives to hedge the exposure to the volatility of crude oil and natural gas commodity prices, all of which had matured byyear ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, FCX had2020. There were no price protectionremaining forward sales contracts relating to its mine production. after June 30, 2020.

A discussion of FCX’s other derivative contracts and programs follows.



Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Fair Value Hedges
Copper Futures and Swap Contracts. Some of FCX’s U.S. copper rod and cathode customers request a fixed market price instead of the COMEX average copper price in the month of shipment. FCX hedges this price exposure in a manner that allows it to receive the COMEX average price in the month of shipment while the customers pay the fixed price they requested. FCX accomplishes this by entering into copper futures or swap contracts. Hedging gains or losses from these copper futures and swap contracts are recorded in revenues. FCX did not have any significant gains or losses during the three years ended December 31, 2018, resulting from hedge ineffectiveness. At ineffectiveness during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021. At December 31, 2021, FCX held copper futures and swap contracts that qualified for hedge accounting for 6878 million pounds at an average contract price of $2.77$4.30 per pound, with maturities through June 2020.October 2023.


A summary of gains (losses) gains recognized in revenues for derivative financial instruments related to commodity contracts that are designated and qualify as fair value hedge transactions, including the unrealized gains (losses) on the related hedged item for the years ended December 31 follows:follows (in millions):
 202120202019
Copper futures and swap contracts:
Unrealized (losses) gains:
Derivative financial instruments$(4)$$15 
Hedged item - firm sales commitments(9)(15)
Realized gains (losses):
Matured derivative financial instruments65 22 (8)
 2018 2017 2016
Copper futures and swap contracts:     
Unrealized (losses) gains:     
Derivative financial instruments$(20) $4
 $16
Hedged item – firm sales commitments20
 (4) (16)
      
Realized (losses) gains:     
Matured derivative financial instruments(22) 30
 1

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Embedded Derivatives. Certain FCX concentrate, copper cathode and gold sales contracts provide for provisional pricing primarily based on the LME copper price or the COMEX copper price and the LMBALondon gold price at the time of shipment as specified in the contract. FCX receives market prices based on prices in the specified future month, which results in price fluctuations recorded toin revenues until the date of settlement. FCX records revenues and invoices customers at the time of shipment based on then-current LME or COMEX copper prices and the London gold prices as specified in the contracts, which results in an embedded derivative (i.e., a pricing mechanism that is finalized after the time of delivery) that is required to be bifurcated from the host contract. The host contract is the sale of the metals contained in the concentrate or cathode at the then-current LME or COMEX copper price and the London gold price. FCX applies the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception in accordance with derivatives and hedge accounting guidance to the host contract in its concentrate or cathode sales agreements since these contracts do not allow for net settlement and always result in physical delivery. The embedded derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting and is adjusted to fair value through earnings each period, using the period-end LME or COMEX copper forward prices and the adjusted London gold price, until the date of final pricing. Similarly, FCX purchases copper and cobalt under contracts that provide for provisional pricing. Mark-to-market price
159

fluctuations from these embedded derivatives are recorded through the settlement date and are reflected in revenues for sales contracts and in inventory for purchase contracts.

A summary of FCX’s embedded derivatives at December 31, 2018,2021, follows:
OpenAverage Price
Per Unit
Maturities
 PositionsContractMarketThrough
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales contracts:    
Copper (millions of pounds)682 $4.37 $4.42 July 2022
Gold (thousands of ounces)223 1,797 1,822 March 2022
Embedded derivatives in provisional purchase contracts:    
Copper (millions of pounds)132 4.38 4.42 April 2022
 Open 
Average Price
Per Unit
 Maturities
 Positions Contract Market Through
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales contracts:       
Copper (millions of pounds)489
 $2.78
 $2.70
 May 2019
Gold (thousands of ounces)119
 1,229
 1,286
 April 2019
Embedded derivatives in provisional purchase contracts:       
Copper (millions of pounds)117
 2.79
 2.71
 May 2019
Cobalt (millions of pounds)9
 19.58
 19.25
 March 2019


Crude Oil and Natural Gas Contracts. FCX had no outstanding crude oil or natural gas derivative contracts as of December 31, 2018 or 2017. As part of the terms of the agreement to sell its onshore California oil and gas properties, FM O&G entered into derivative contracts during October 2016. Sentinel assumed these contracts at the time of the sale in December 2016. These derivative contracts were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and were recorded at fair value with the mark-to-market gains and losses recorded in revenues (oil contracts) and production costs (natural gas contracts).


Copper Forward Contracts. Atlantic Copper FCX’s wholly owned smelting and refining unit in Spain, enters into copper forward contracts designed to hedge its copper price risk whenever its physical purchases and sales pricing periods do not match. These economic hedge transactions are intended to hedge against changes in copper prices, with the mark-to-market hedging gains or losses recorded in cost of sales.production and delivery costs. At December 31, 2018,2021, Atlantic Copper held net copper forward sales contracts for 82 million pounds at an average contract price of $2.76$4.53 per pound, with maturities through February 2019.March 2022.


Summary of Gains (Losses) Gains. . A summary of the realized and unrealized gains (losses) gains recognized in operating income (loss) for commodity contracts that do not qualify as hedge transactions, including embedded derivatives, for the years ended December 31 follows:follows (in millions):
 202120202019
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales contractsa:
 Copper$425 $259 $34 
 Gold and other(2)45 20 
Copper forward contractsb
(15)(7)
 2018 2017 2016
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales contractsa
     
 Copper$(310) $489
 $262
    Gold and other(7) 26
 4
Crude oil options and swapsa

 
 (35)
Copper forward contractsb
18
 (15) 5
a.Amounts recorded in revenues.
a.Amounts recorded in revenues.
b.Amounts recorded in cost of sales as production and delivery costs.

b.Amounts recorded in cost of sales as production and delivery costs.

Unsettled Derivative Financial Instruments
A summary of the fair values of unsettled commodity derivative financial instruments follows:
 December 31,
 20212020
Commodity Derivative Assets:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:  
Copper futures and swap contracts$12 $15 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:  
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase contracts64 169 
Copper forward contracts— 
Total derivative assets$77 $184 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
Commodity Derivative Assets:   
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:   
Copper futures and swap contracts$
 $11
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper, gold and cobalt 
  
sales/purchase contracts23
 155
Copper forward contracts
 1
Total derivative assets$23
 $167
Commodity Derivative Liabilities:  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase contracts$27 $21 
Copper forward contracts— 
Total derivative liabilities$28 $21 
Commodity Derivative Liabilities:   
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:   
Copper futures and swap contracts$9
 $
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper, gold and cobalt   
sales/purchase contracts39
 55
Copper forward contracts
 2
Total derivative liabilities$48
 $57


FCX’s commodity contracts have netting arrangements with counterparties with which the right of offset exists, and it is FCX’s policy to generally offset balances by contract on its balance sheet. FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional sales/purchase contracts are netted with the corresponding outstanding receivable/payable balances.




160

A summary of these unsettled commodity contracts that are offset in the balance sheet follows:
follows (in millions):
 Assets at December 31, Liabilities at December 31,Assets at December 31,Liabilities at December 31,
 2018 2017 2018 20172021202020212020
        
Gross amounts recognized:        Gross amounts recognized:
Commodity contracts:        Commodity contracts:
Embedded derivatives in provisional        Embedded derivatives in provisional
sales/purchase contracts $23
 $155
 $39
 $55
sales/purchase contracts$64 $169 $27 $21 
Copper derivatives 
 12
 9
 2
Copper derivatives13 15 — 
 23
 167
 48
 57
77 184 28 21 
        
Less gross amounts of offset:        Less gross amounts of offset:
Commodity contracts:        Commodity contracts:
Embedded derivatives in provisional        Embedded derivatives in provisional
sales/purchase contracts 7
 
 7
 
sales/purchase contracts
Copper derivatives 
 1
 
 1
Copper derivatives— — 
 7
 1
 7
 1
        
Net amounts presented in balance sheet:        Net amounts presented in balance sheet:
Commodity contracts:        Commodity contracts:
Embedded derivatives in provisional        Embedded derivatives in provisional
sales/purchase contracts 16
 155
 32
 55
sales/purchase contracts61 168 24 20 
Copper derivatives 
 11
 9
 1
Copper derivatives12 15 — — 
 $16
 $166
 $41
 $56
$73 $183 $24 $20 
        
Balance sheet classification:        Balance sheet classification:
Trade accounts receivable $3
 $151
 $24
 $
Trade accounts receivable$51 $168 $14 $— 
Other current assets 
 11
 
 
Other current assets12 15 — — 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 13
 4
 17
 56
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities10 — 10 20 
 $16
 $166
 $41
 $56
$73 $183 $24 $20 

Credit Risk. FCX is exposed to credit loss when financial institutions with which it has entered into derivative transactions (commodity, foreign exchange and interest rate swaps) are unable to pay. To minimize the risk of such losses, FCX uses counterparties that meet certain credit requirements and periodically reviews the creditworthiness of these counterparties. FCX does not anticipate that any of the counterparties it deals with will default on their obligations. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the maximum amount of credit exposure associated with derivative transactions was $16$77 million.


Other Financial Instruments. Other financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investment securities, legally restricted funds, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, dividends payable and long-term debt. The carrying value for cash and cash equivalents (which included time deposits of $2.3$0.2 billion at December 31, 2018,2021, and $2.9$0.3 billion at December 31, 2017)2020), restricted cash, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and dividends payable approximates fair value because of their short-term nature and generally negligible credit losses (refer to Note 15 for the fair values of investment securities, legally restricted funds and long-term debt).


In addition, as of December 31, 2018,2021, FCX has contingent consideration assets related to the sales of certain 2016 asset salesoil and gas properties (refer to Note 15 for the related fair valuevalues).


161

Trade Accounts Receivable Agreements. In first-quarter 2021, PT-FI entered into agreements to sell certain trade accounts receivables to unrelated third-party financial institutions. The agreements were entered into in the normal course of business to fund the working capital for the additional quantity of copper to be supplied by PT-FI to PT Smelting. The balances sold under the agreements were excluded from trade accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021. Receivables are considered sold when (i) they are transferred beyond the reach of PT-FI and its creditors, (ii) the purchaser has the right to Note 2 for further discussionpledge or exchange the receivables, and (iii) PT-FI has no continuing involvement in the transferred receivables. In addition, PT-FI provides no other forms of continued financial support to the purchaser of the receivables once the receivables are sold.

Gross amounts sold under these instruments).arrangements totaled $431 million in 2021. Discounts on the sold receivables totaled $2 million in 2021.


Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents. The following table provides a reconciliation of total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows to the components presented in the consolidated balance sheets:(in millions):
December 31,
20212020
Balance sheet components:
Cash and cash equivalents$8,068 $3,657 
Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents included in:
Other current assets114 97 
Other assets132 149 
Total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows$8,314 $3,903 

162
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Balance sheet components:    
Cash and cash equivalents $4,217
 $4,526
Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents included in:    
Other current assets 110
 52
Other assets 128
 132
Total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows $4,455
 $4,710

NOTE 15.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value accounting guidance includes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). FCX did not have any significant transfers in or out of Level 3 for 2018.2021.


FCX’s financial instruments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value except for contingent consideration associated with the sale of the Deepwater GOM oil and gas properties (which was recorded under the loss recovery approach) and debt. A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of FCX’s financial instruments (including those measured at NAV as a practical expedient), other than cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and dividends payable (refer to Note 14) follows:
 At December 31, 2018
 Carrying Fair Value
 Amount Total NAV Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets           
Investment securities:a,b
           
U.S. core fixed income fund$25
 $25
 $25
 $
 $
 $
Equity securities4
 4
 
 4
 
 
Total29
 29
 25
 4
 
 
            
Legally restricted funds:a
           
U.S. core fixed income fund55
 55
 55
 
 
 
Government mortgage-backed securities38
 38
 
 
 38
 
Government bonds and notes36
 36
 
 
 36
 
Corporate bonds28
 28
 
 
 28
 
Asset-backed securities11
 11
 
 
 11
 
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities7
 7
 
 
 7
 
Money market funds5
 5
 
 5
 
 
Municipal bonds1
 1
 
 
 1
 
Total181
 181
 55
 5
 121
 
            
Derivatives:           
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper,           
gold and cobalt sales/purchase contracts           
in a gross asset positionc
23
 23
 
 
 23
 
Contingent consideration for the sales of TFHL           
and onshore California oil and gas propertiesa
73
 73
 
 
 73
 
Total96
 96
 
 
 96
 
            
Contingent consideration for the sale of the           
Deepwater GOM oil and gas propertiesa
143
 127
 
 
 
 127
            
Liabilities           
Derivatives:c
           
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper,           
gold and cobalt sales/purchase contracts           
in a gross asset position$39
 $39
 $
 $
 $39
 $
Copper futures and swap contracts9
 9
 
 7
 2
 
Total48
 48
 
 7
 41
 
            
Long-term debt, including current portiond
11,141
 10,238
 
 
 10,238
 
 At December 31, 2021
CarryingFair Value
 AmountTotalNAVLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets    
Investment securities:a,b
    
Equity securities$50 $50 $— $50 $— $— 
U.S. core fixed income fund29 29 29 — — — 
Total79 79 29 50 — — 
Legally restricted funds:a
    
U.S. core fixed income fund64 64 64 — — — 
Government bonds and notes53 53 — — 53 — 
Corporate bonds45 45 — — 45 — 
Government mortgage-backed securities20 20 — — 20 — 
Asset-backed securities18 18 — — 18 — 
Money market funds— — — 
Municipal bonds— — — 
Total209 209 64 137 — 
Derivatives:
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross asset positionc
64 64 — — 64 — 
Copper futures and swap contractsc
12 12 — — 
Copper forward contractsc
— — — 
Total77 77 — 10 67 — 
Contingent consideration for the sale of the
Deepwater GOM oil and gas propertiesa
90 81 — — — 81 
Liabilities    
Derivatives:c
    
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross liability position27 27 — — 27 — 
Copper forward contracts— — — 
Total28 28 — 27 — 
Long-term debt, including current portiond
9,450 10,630 — — 10,630 — 
163


At December 31, 2020
 CarryingFair Value
 AmountTotalNAVLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets    
Investment securities:a,b
    
U.S. core fixed income fund$29 $29 $29 $— $— $— 
Equity securities— — — 
Total36 36 29 — — 
Legally restricted funds:a
    
U.S. core fixed income fund65 65 65 — — — 
Government bonds and notes49 49 — — 49 — 
Corporate bonds43 43 — — 43 — 
Government mortgage-backed securities30 30 — — 30 — 
Asset-backed securities16 16 — — 16 — 
Money market funds— — — 
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities— — — 
Municipal bonds— — — 
Total213 213 65 143 — 
Derivatives:    
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross asset positionc
169 169 — — 169 — 
Copper futures and swap contractsc
15 15 — 13 — 
Total184 184 — 13 171 — 
Contingent consideration for the sale of the
Deepwater GOM oil and gas propertiesa
108 88 — — — 88 
Liabilities    
Derivatives:c
    
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross liability position21 21 — — 21 — 
Long-term debt, including current portiond
9,711 10,994 — — 10,994 — 
a.Current portion included in other current assets and long-term portion included in other assets.
 At December 31, 2017
 Carrying Fair Value
 Amount Total NAV Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets           
Investment securities:a,b
           
U.S. core fixed income fund$25
 $25
 $25
 $
 $
 $
Equity securities5
 5
 
 5
 
 
Total30
 30
 25
 5
 
 
            
Legally restricted funds:a
           
U.S. core fixed income fund55
 55
 55
 
 
 
Government bonds and notes40
 40
 
 
 40
 
Corporate bonds32
 32
 
 
 32
 
Government mortgage-backed securities27
 27
 
 
 27
 
Asset-backed securities15
 15
 
 
 15
 
Money market funds11
 11
 
 11
 
 
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities8
 8
 
 
 8
 
Municipal bonds1
 1
 
 
 1
 
Total189
 189
 55
 11
 123
 
            
Derivatives:   
    
  
  
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper,   
    
  
  
gold and cobalt sales/purchase contracts           
in a gross asset positionc
155
 155
 
 
 155
 
Copper futures and swap contractsc
11
 11
 
 9
 2
 
Copper forward contractsc
1
 1
 
 
 1
 
Contingent consideration for the sales of TFHL           
and onshore California oil and gas propertiesa
108
 108
 
 
 108
 
Total275
 275
 
 9
 266
 
            
Contingent consideration for the sale of the           
Deepwater GOM oil and gas propertiesa
150
 134
 
 
 
 134
            
Liabilities   
    
  
  
Derivatives:c
   
    
  
  
Embedded derivatives in provisional copper,   
    
  
  
gold and cobalt sales/purchase contracts           
in a gross liability position$55
 $55
 $
 $
 $55
 $
Copper forward contracts2
 2
 
 1
 1
 
Total57
 57
 
 1
 56
 
            
            
Long-term debt, including current portiond
13,229
 13,381
 
 
 13,381
 
a.Current portion included in other current assets and long-term portion included in other assets.
b.Excludes time deposits (which approximated fair value) included in (i) other current assets of $109 million at December 31, 2018, and $52 million at December 31, 2017, and (ii) other assets of $126 million at December 31, 2018, and $123 million at December 31, 2017, primarily associated with an assurance bond to support PT-FI’s commitment for the development of a new smelter in Indonesia (refer to Note 13 for further discussion) and PT-FI’s closure and reclamation guarantees (refer to Note 12 for further discussion).
c.Refer to Note 14 for further discussion and balance sheet classifications.
d.Recorded at cost except for debt assumed in acquisitions, which are recorded at fair value at the respective acquisition dates.

b.Excludes time deposits (which approximated fair value) included in (i) other current assets of $114 million at December 31, 2021, and $97 million at December 31, 2020, and (ii) other assets of $132 million at December 31, 2021, and $148 million at December 31, 2020, primarily associated with an assurance bond to support PT-FI’s commitment for the development of a greenfield smelter in Indonesia (refer to Note 13 for further discussion) and PT-FI’s closure and reclamation guarantees (refer to Note 12 for further discussion).
c.Refer to Note 14 for further discussion and balance sheet classifications.
d.Recorded at cost except for debt assumed in acquisitions, which are recorded at fair value at the respective acquisition dates.

Valuation Techniques. Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The U.S. core fixed income fund is valued at NAV. The fund strategy seeks total return consisting of income and capital appreciation primarily by investing in a broad range of investment-grade debt securities, including U.S. government obligations, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and money market instruments. There are no restrictions on redemptions (which are usually within one business day of notice).

Money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.


Fixed income securities (government securities, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, collateralized mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds) are valued using a bid-evaluation price or a mid-evaluation price. These evaluations are based on quoted prices, if available, or models that use observable inputs and, as such, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


Money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.
164

FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional copper concentrate, copper cathode and gold purchases and sales are valued using only quoted monthly LME or COMEX copper forward prices and the adjusted LBMALondon gold prices at each reporting date based on the month of maturity (refer to Note 14 for further discussion); however, FCX’s contracts themselves are not traded on an exchange. FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional cobalt purchases are valued using quoted monthly LME cobalt forward prices or average published Metals Bulletin cobalt prices, subject to certain adjustments as specified by the terms of the contracts, at each reporting date based on the month of maturity. As a result, these derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


FCX’s derivative financial instruments for copper futures and swap contracts and copper forward contracts that are traded on the respective exchanges are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted monthly COMEX or LME prices at each reporting date based on the month of maturity (refer to Note 14 for further discussion). Certain of these contracts are traded on the over-the-counter market and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy based on COMEX and LME forward prices.


The fair value of contingent consideration for the sales of TFHL and onshore California oil and gas properties (refer to Note 2 for further discussion) is calculated based on average commodity price forecasts through applicable maturity dates using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The models use various observable inputs, including Brent crude oil forward prices, historical copper and cobalt prices, volatilities, discount rates and settlement terms. As a result, these contingent consideration assets are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of contingent consideration for theIn December 2016, FCX’s sale of its Deepwater GOM oil and gas properties (referincluded up to Note 2$150 million in contingent consideration that was recorded at the total amount under the loss recovery approach. The contingent consideration is being received over time as future cash flows are realized from a third-party production handling agreement for further discussion) isan offshore platform, with the related payments commencing in third-quarter 2018. The contingent consideration included in (i) other current assets totaled $20 million at December 31, 2021, and $12 million at December 31, 2020, and (ii) other assets totaled $70 million at December 31, 2021, and $96 million at December 31, 2020. The fair value of this contingent consideration was calculated based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs that include third-party estimates for reserves, production rates and production timing, and discount rates. Because significant inputs are not observable in the market, the contingent consideration is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.


Long-term debt, including current portion, is primarily valued using available market quotes and, as such, is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


The techniques described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of NRV or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while FCX believes its valuation techniques are appropriate and consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of different techniques or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. There have been no changes in the techniques used at December 31, 2018.2021, as compared to those techniques used at December 31, 2020.



A summary of the changes in the fair value of FCXs Level 3 instrument, contingent consideration for the sale of the Deepwater GOM oil and gas properties, for the years ended December 31 follows:
202120202019
Balance at beginning of year$88 $108 $127 
Net unrealized gains (losses) related to assets still held at the end of the year12 (6)
Settlements(19)(14)(21)
Balance at end of year$81 $88 $108 

165
 2018 2017 2016 
Balance at beginning of year$134
 $135
 $
 
Net unrealized (losses) gains related to assets still held at the end of the year
 (1) 135
 
Settlements(7) 
 
 
Balance at the end of the year$127
 $134
 $135
 



NOTE 16.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Product Revenues. FCX’s revenues attributable to the products it sold for the years ended December 31 follow:
 202120202019
Copper:
Concentrate$8,705 $4,294 $4,566 
Cathode5,900 4,204 3,656 
Rod and other refined copper products3,369 2,052 2,110 
Purchased coppera
757 821 1,060 
Gold2,580 1,702 1,620 
Molybdenum1,283 848 1,169 
Otherb
821 592 905 
Adjustments to revenues:
Treatment charges(445)(362)(404)
Royalty expensec
(330)(165)(113)
Export dutiesd
(218)(92)(221)
Revenues from contracts with customers22,422 13,894 14,348 
Embedded derivativese
423 304 54 
Total consolidated revenues$22,845 $14,198 $14,402 
 2018 2017 2016
Copper:     
Concentrate$6,180
 $5,604
 $5,048
Cathode4,366
 3,759
 3,495
Rod, and other refined copper products2,396
 2,387
 2,082
Purchased coppera
1,053
 789
 428
Gold3,231
 2,126
 1,592
Molybdenum1,190
 896
 659
Otherb
1,490
 1,159
 2,145
Adjustments to revenues:     
Treatment charges(535) (536) (652)
Royalty expensec
(246) (181) (138)
Export dutiesd
(180) (115) (95)
Revenues from contracts with customers18,945
 15,888
 14,564
Embedded derivativese
(317) 515
 266
Total consolidated revenues$18,628
 $16,403
 $14,830
a.FCX purchases copper cathode primarily for processing by its Rod & Refining operations.
b.Primarily includes revenues associated with cobalt, silver, oil, gas and natural gas liquids.
c.Reflects royalties for sales from PT-FI and Cerro Verde that will vary with the volume of metal sold and the prices of copper and gold.
d.Refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI export duties.
e.Refer to Note 14 for discussion of embedded derivatives related to FCX’s provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales contracts.

a.FCX purchases copper cathode primarily for processing by its Rod & Refining operations.
b.Primarily includes revenues associated with silver and cobalt.
c.Reflects royalties on sales from PT-FI and Cerro Verde that will vary with the volume of metal sold and prices.
d.Reflects PT-FI export duties. The year 2019 includes charges totaling $155 million primarily associated with an unfavorable Indonesia Supreme Court ruling related to certain disputed export duties (refer to Note 12).
e.Refer to Note 14 for discussion of embedded derivatives related to FCX’s provisionally priced concentrate and cathode sales contracts.

Geographic Area. Information concerning financial data by geographic area follows:
December 31,
 20212020
Long-lived assets:a
  
Indonesia$16,288 $15,567 
U.S.8,292 8,420 
Peru6,827 6,989 
Chile1,110 1,172 
Other261 290 
Total$32,778 $32,438 
a.Excludes deferred tax assets and intangible assets.
Years Ended December 31,
 202120202019
Revenues:a
   
U.S.$7,168 $5,248 $5,107 
Switzerland3,682 2,032 2,223 
Indonesia3,132 1,760 1,894 
Japan2,372 1,205 1,181 
Spain1,495 785 884 
China1,044 692 531 
United Kingdom659 491 233 
Germany469 248 311 
Chile343 221 242 
Korea270 89 140 
Egypt268 153 123 
Philippines264 34 73 
India207 152 107 
Other1,472 1,088 1,353 
Total$22,845 $14,198 $14,402 
a.Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.
166

 December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Long-lived assets:a
     
Indonesia$14,025
 $8,938
 $8,794
U.S.8,208
 8,312
 8,282
Peru7,274
 7,485
 7,981
Chile1,128
 1,221
 1,269
Other458
 408
 378
Total$31,093
 $26,364
 $26,704
a.Excludes deferred tax assets and intangible assets.

 Years Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Revenues:a
     
U.S.$5,790
 $5,344
 $5,896
Switzerland2,941
 1,200
 1,147
Indonesia2,226
 2,023
 1,402
Japan1,946
 1,882
 1,350
Spain1,070
 1,086
 878
China873
 1,136
 1,125
India389
 782
 553
United Kingdom296
 226
 204
Chile294
 248
 250
Belgium278
 39
 87
Korea269
 364
 219
Germany256
 161
 162
France255
 122
 80
Philippines221
 378
 261
Bermuda207
 226
 273
Other1,317
 1,186
 943
Total$18,628
 $16,403
 $14,830
a.Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.

Major Customers and Affiliated Companies. Copper concentrate sales to PT Smelting totaled 1214 percent of FCX’s consolidated revenues for both the years ended December 31, 2018in 2021, 12 percent in 2020 and 2017, which is13 percent in2019, and they are the only customer that accounted for 10 percent or more of FCX’s consolidated revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Consolidated revenues include sales to the noncontrolling interest owners of FCX’s South America mining operations totaling $1.2$1.4 billion in 2018, $1.12021, $0.9 billion in 20172020and$1.0 billion in2016,2019, and PT-FI’s sales to PT Smelting totaling $2.2$3.1 billion in 2018, $2.02021, $1.8 billion in 20172020 and $1.4$1.9 billion in 2016.2019.


Labor Matters.As of December 31, 2018,2021, approximately 3731 percent of FCX’s global labor force was covered by collective bargaining agreements, and approximately 2114 percent was covered by agreements that expired and are currently being negotiatedwill or willwere scheduled to expire within one year.during 2022. In February 2022, PT-FI completed negotiations with its unions on a new two-year collective bargaining agreement that is effective through March 2024.


Business Segments. FCX has organized its mining operations into four primary divisions - North America copper mines, South America mining, Indonesia mining and Molybdenum mines, and operating segments that meet certain thresholds are reportable segments. Separately disclosed in the following tables are FCX’s reportable segments, which include the Morenci, Cerro Verde and Grasberg (Indonesia Mining) copper mines, the Rod & Refining operations and Atlantic Copper Smelting & Refining.


Intersegment sales between FCX’s business segments are based on terms similar to arms-length transactions with third parties at the time of the sale. Intersegment sales may not be reflective of the actual prices ultimately realized because of a variety of factors, including additional processing, timing of sales to unaffiliated customers and transportation premiums.


FCX defers recognizing profits on sales from its mines to other divisions,segments, including Atlantic Copper (FCX’s wholly owned smelterSmelting & Refining and refinery in Spain) and on 25 percent of PT-FI’s sales to PT Smelting (PT-FI’s 25-percent-owned smelter(on 25.0 percent prior to April 30, 2021, and refinery in Indonesia),39.5 percent thereafter) until final sales to third parties occur. Quarterly variations in ore grades, the timing of intercompany shipments and changes in product prices result in variability in FCX’s net deferred profits and quarterly earnings.



FCX allocates certain operating costs, expenses and capital expenditures to its operating divisions and individual segments. However, not all costs and expenses applicable to an operation are allocated. U.S. federal and state income taxes are recorded and managed at the corporate level (included in Corporate, Other & Eliminations), whereas foreign income taxes are recorded and managed at the applicable country level. In addition, most mining exploration and research activities are managed on a consolidated basis, and those costs, along with some selling, general and administrative costs, are not allocated to the operating divisions or individual segments. Accordingly, the following Financial Information by Business Segment reflects management determinations that may not be indicative of what the actual financial performance of each operating division or segment would be if it was an independent entity.


North America Copper Mines. FCX operates seven open-pit copper mines in North America - Morenci, Safford (including Lone Star), Bagdad, Safford, Sierrita and Miami in Arizona, and Chino and Tyrone in New Mexico. The North America copper mines include open-pit mining, sulfide oresulfide-ore concentrating, leaching and SX/EW operations. A majority of the copper produced at the North America copper mines is cast into copper rod by FCX’s Rod & Refining segment. In addition to copper, certain of FCX’s North America copper mines also produce molybdenum concentrate, gold and silver.


The Morenci open-pit mine, located in southeastern Arizona, produces copper cathode and copper concentrate. In addition to copper, the Morenci mine also produces molybdenum concentrate. TheDuring 2021, the Morenci mine produced 4943 percent of FCX’s North America copper during 2018.and 16 percent of FCX’s consolidated copper production.


South America Mining. South America mining includes two operating copper mines - Cerro Verde in Peru and El Abra in Chile. These operations include open-pit mining, sulfide oresulfide-ore concentrating, leaching and SX/EW operations.


The Cerro Verde open-pit copper mine, located near Arequipa, Peru, produces copper cathode and copper concentrate. In addition to copper, the Cerro Verde mine also produces molybdenum concentrate and silver. TheDuring 2021, the Cerro Verde mine produced 8485 percent of FCX’s South America copper during 2018.and 23 percent of FCX’s consolidated copper production.

167

Indonesia Mining. Indonesia mining includes PT-FI’s Grasberg minerals district that produces copper concentrate that contains significant quantities of gold and silver. During 2021, PT-FI’s Grasberg minerals district produced 35 percent of FCX’s consolidated copper production and 99 percent of FCX’s consolidated gold production.
 
Molybdenum Mines. Molybdenum mines include the wholly owned Henderson underground mine and Climax open-pit mine, both in Colorado. The Henderson and Climax mines produce high-purity, chemical-grade molybdenum concentrate, which is typically further processed into value-added molybdenum chemical products.


Rod & Refining. The Rod & Refining segment consists of copper conversion facilities located in North America, and includes a refinery threeand two rod mills, and a specialty copper products facility, which are combined in accordance with segment reporting aggregation guidance. These operations process copper produced at FCX’s North America copper mines and purchased copper into copper cathode rod and custom copper shapes.rod. At times these operations refine copper and produce copper rod and shapes for customers on a toll basis. Toll arrangements require the tolling customer to deliver appropriate copper-bearing material to FCX’s facilities for processing into a product that is returned to the customer, who pays FCX for processing its material into the specified products.


Atlantic Copper Smelting & Refining. Atlantic Copper smelts and refines copper concentrate and markets refined copper and precious metals in slimes. During 2018,2021, Atlantic Copper purchased 1418 percentof its concentrate requirements from theFCX’s North America copper mines, 57 percentfrom theFCX’s South America mining operations and 49 percent from theFCX’s Indonesia mining operations, with the remainder purchased from unaffiliated third parties.


Corporate, Other & Eliminations. Corporate, Other & Eliminations consists ofFCX’sother mining, and eliminations, oil and gas operations and other corporate and elimination items. Other mining and eliminationsitems, which include the Miami smelter, (a smelter at FCX’s Miami, Arizona, mining operation), Freeport Cobalt (until the sale of it in September 2021), molybdenum conversion facilities in the U.S. and Europe, fivethe greenfield smelter and PMR in Indonesia, certain non-operating copper mines in North America (Ajo, Bisbee Tohono, Twin Buttes and ChristmasTohono in Arizona) and other mining support entities.

168

Financial Information by Business Segment
North America Copper MinesSouth America Mining     
AtlanticCorporate,
CopperOther
CerroIndonesiaMolybdenumRod &Smelting& Elimi-FCX
MorenciOtherTotalVerdeOtherTotalMiningMinesRefining& RefiningnationsTotal
Year Ended December 31, 2021          
Revenues:           
Unaffiliated customers$82 $180 $262 $3,736 $720 $4,456 $7,241 $— $6,356 $2,961 $1,569 a$22,845 
Intersegment2,728 3,835 6,563 460 — 

460 282 444 29 — (7,778)— 
Production and delivery1,226 2,235 3,461 2,000 b429 2,429 2,425 c253 6,381 2,907 (5,840)d12,016 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization152 217 369 366 47 413 1,049 67 28 67 1,998 
Metals inventory adjustments13 — 13 — — — — — — 16 
Selling, general and administrative expenses— 111 — — 24 236 

383 
Mining exploration and research expenses— — — — — — — — 54 55 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs— (1)(1)— — — — — — — 92 91 
Net gain on sales of assets— — — — — — — — — (19)(61)e(80)
Operating income (loss)1,417 1,561 2,978 1,822 244 2,066 3,938 123 (1)21 

(759)8,366 
Interest expense, net— 28 

— 28 48 — — 519 602 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes— — — 730 

90 820 1,524 f— — — (45)2,299 
Total assets at December 31, 20212,708 5,208 7,916 8,694 1,921 10,615 18,971 1,713 228 1,318 7,261 48,022 
Capital expenditures135 207 342 132 30 162 1,296 34 273 g2,115 
 North America Copper Mines South America             
                   Atlantic Corporate,   
                   Copper Other   
       Cerro     Indonesia Molybdenum Rod & Smelting & Elimi- FCX 
 Morenci Other Total Verde Other Total Mining Mines Refining & Refining nations Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2018                        
Revenues:                        
Unaffiliated customers$90
 $54
 $144
 $2,709
 $594
 $3,303
 $5,446

$
 $5,103
 $2,299
 $2,333
a 
$18,628
 
Intersegment2,051
 2,499
 4,550
 352
 

352
 113
 410
 31
 3
 (5,459) 
 
Production and delivery1,183
 1,945
 3,128
 1,887
b,c 
478
 2,365
 1,864
d 
289
 5,117
 2,218
 (3,290)
11,691
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization176
 184
 360
 456
 90
 546
 606
 79
 11
 27
 125
e 
1,754
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses3
 3
 6
 9
 
 9
 123
 
 
 21
 284

443
 
Mining exploration and research expenses
 3
 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 102
 105
 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs
 2
 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 87
 89
 
Net gain on sales of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (208)
f 
(208) 
Operating income (loss)779
 416
 1,195
 709
 26
 735
 2,966
 42
 6
 36

(226) 4,754
 
                         
Interest expense, net3
 1
 4
 429
c 

 429
 1
 
 
 25
 486
 945
 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
 
 253
c 
15
 268
 755
g 

 
 1
 (33)
h 
991
 
Total assets at December 31, 20182,922
 4,608
 7,530
 8,524
 1,707
 10,231
 15,646
 1,796
 233
 773
 6,007
 42,216
 
Capital expenditures216
 385
 601
 220
 17
 237
 1,001
 9
 5
 16
 102
 1,971
 
                         
Year Ended December 31, 2017                        
Revenues:                        
Unaffiliated customers$228
 $180
 $408
 $2,811
 $498
 $3,309
 $4,445
 $
 $4,456
 $2,031
 $1,754
a 
$16,403
 
Intersegment1,865
 2,292
 4,157
 385
 

385
 
 268
 26
 1
 (4,837) 
 
Production and delivery1,043
 1,702
 2,745
 1,878
c 
366
 2,244
 1,735
i 
227
 4,467
 1,966
 (3,118) 10,266
j 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization178
 247
 425
 441
 84
 525
 556
 76
 10
 28
 94
 1,714
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses2
 2
 4
 9
 
 9
 126
i 

 
 18
 320
 477
 
Mining exploration and research expenses
 2
 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 91
 93
 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 244
 244
 
Net gain on sales of assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (81)
f 
(81) 
Operating income (loss)870
 519
 1,389
 868
 48
 916
 2,028
 (35) 5
 20
 (633) 3,690
 
                         
Interest expense, net3
 1
 4
 212
c 

 212
 4
 
 
 18
 563
 801
 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
 
 436
c 
10
 446
 869
 
 
 5
 (437)
h 
883
 
Total assets at December 31, 20172,861
 4,241
 7,102
 8,878
 1,702
 10,580
 10,911
 1,858
 277
 822
 5,752
 37,302
 
Capital expenditures114
 53
 167
 103
 12
 115
 875
 5
 4
 41
 203
 1,410
 
a.a.Includes revenues from FCX’s molybdenum sales company, which includes sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.
b.Includes charges totaling $69 million associated with Cerro Verde’s new three-year collective labor agreement.
c.Includes net charges totaling $14 million in production and delivery costs in 2018 and $203 million in 2017, $370 million in interest expense in 2018 and $145 million in 2017, and $35 million of net tax benefits in provision for income taxes in 2018 and $7 million of net tax charges in 2017 associated with disputed royalties for prior years.
d.Includes net charges of $223 million primarily associated with surface water tax disputes with the local regional tax authority in Papua, assessments of prior period permit fees with the MOEF, disputed payroll withholding taxes for prior years and other tax settlements, and to write-off certain previously capitalized project costs for the new smelter in Indonesia, partially offset by inventory adjustments.
e.Includes $31 million of depreciation expense at Freeport Cobalt from December 2016 through December 2017 that was suspended while it was classified as held for sale.
f.Includes net gains in 2018 totaling $97 million associated with a favorable adjustment to the estimated fair value less costs to sell for Freeport Cobalt and fair value adjustments of $31 million associated with potential contingent consideration related to the 2016 sale of onshore California oil and gas properties; and net gains in 2017, primarily associated with sales of oil and gas properties of $49 million and a favorable adjustment of $13 million associated with the estimated fair value less costs to sell for the Kisanfu exploration project. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
g.Includes tax credits totaling $571 million related to the change in PT-FI's tax rates in accordance with its IUPK ($504 million), U.S. tax reform ($47 million) and adjustment to PT-FI's historical tax positions ($20 million).
h.Includes net tax credits totaling $76 million in 2018 and $438 million in 2017 primarily related to U.S. tax reform. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion.
i.Includes net charges at PT-FI associated with workforce reductions totaling $120 million in production and delivery costs and $5 million in selling, general and administrative expenses.
j.Includes a $42 million decrease related to the adoption of the new guidance for the presentation of net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans (refer to Note 1 for further discussion).

      
 North America Copper Mines South America             
                   Atlantic Corporate,   
                   Copper Other   
       Cerro     Indonesia Molybdenum Rod & Smelting & Elimi- FCX 
 Morenci Other Total Verde Other Total Mining Mines Refining & Refining nations Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2016                        
Revenues:                        
Unaffiliated customers$444
 $240
 $684
 $2,241
 $510
 $2,751
 $3,233
 $
 $3,833
 $1,825
 $2,504
a,b 
$14,830
 
Intersegment1,511
 2,179
 3,690
 187
 

187
 62
 186
 29
 5
 (4,159) 
 
Production and delivery1,162
 1,752
 2,914
 1,351
 407
 1,758
 1,775
 212
 3,833
 1,712
 (1,517)
c 
10,687
d 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization217
 313
 530
 443
 110
 553
 384
 68
 10
 29
 956
 2,530
 
Impairment of oil and gas properties
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4,317
 4,317
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses2
 3
 5
 8
 1
 9
 88
 
 
 17
 478
c 
597
 
Mining exploration and research expenses
 3
 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 60
 63
 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14
 14
 
Net gain on sales of assets(576) 
 (576) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (73) (649) 
Operating income (loss)1,150
 348
 1,498
 626
 (8) 618
 1,048
 (94) 19
 72
 (5,890) (2,729) 
                         
Interest expense, net3
 1
 4
 82
 
 82
 
 
 
 15
 654
 755
 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
 
 222

(6) 216
 442
 
 
 9
 (296) 371
 
Total assets at December 31, 20162,863
 4,448
 7,311
 9,076
 1,533
 10,609
 10,493
 1,934
 220
 658
 6,092

37,317
 
Capital expenditures77
 25
 102
 380
 2
 382
 1,025
 2
 1
 17
 1,284
e 
2,813
 
a.Includes revenues from FCX’s molybdenum sales company, which included sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.
b.Includes net mark-to-market losses totaling $35 million associated with oil derivative contracts, which were entered into as part of the terms to sell the onshore California oil and gas properties in 2016.
c.Includes net charges for oil and gas operations totaling $1.0 billion in production and delivery costs, primarily for drillship settlements/idle rig and contract termination costs, inventory adjustments, asset impairments and other net charges, and $85 million in selling, general and administrative expenses for net restructuring charges.
d.Includes a $46 million decrease related to the adoption of the new guidance for the presentation of net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans (refer to Note 1 for further discussion).
e.Includes $1.2 billion associated with oil and gas operations and $73 million associated with discontinued operations. Refer to Note 2 for a summary of the results of discontinued operations.













NOTE 17. GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
All of the senior notes issued by FCXNorth America and discussed in Note 8 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis jointly and severally by FM O&G LLC, as guarantor, which is a 100-percent-owned subsidiary of FM O&G and FCX. The guarantee is an unsecured obligation of the guarantor and ranks equal in right of paymentSouth America copper mines.
b.Includes nonrecurring charges totaling $92 million associated with all existing and future indebtedness of FM O&G LLC, including indebtedness under FCX’s revolving credit facility. The guarantee ranks senior in right of payment with all of FM O&G LLC’s future subordinated obligations and is effectively subordinated in right of payment to any debt of FM O&G LLC’s subsidiaries. The indentures provide that FM O&G LLC’s guarantee may be released or terminated for certain obligations under the following circumstances: (i) all or substantially all of the equity interests or assets of FM O&G LLC are sold to a third party; or (ii) FM O&G LLC no longer has any obligations under any FM O&G senior notes or any refinancing thereof and no longer guarantees any obligations of FCX under the revolving credit facility or any other senior debt or, in each case, any refinancing thereof.

The following condensed consolidating financial information includes information regarding FCX, as issuer, FM O&G LLC, as guarantor, and all other non-guarantor subsidiaries of FCX. Included are the condensed consolidating balance sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related condensed consolidating statements of comprehensive income (loss) and the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2018, which should be read in conjunction with FCX’s notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2018

 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
ASSETS         
Current assets$309
 $620
 $10,376
 $(585) $10,720
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net19
 7
 27,984
 
 28,010
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries19,064
 
 
 (19,064) 
Other assets880
 23
 3,218
 (635) 3,486
Total assets$20,272
 $650
 $41,578
 $(20,284) $42,216
          
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         
Current liabilities$245
 $34
 $3,667
 $(617) $3,329
Long-term debt, less current portion9,594
 6,984
 5,649
 (11,103) 11,124
Deferred income taxes524
a 

 3,508
 
 4,032
Environmental and asset retirement obligations, less current portion
 227
 3,382
 
 3,609
Investments in consolidated subsidiary
 578
 10,513
 (11,091) 
Other liabilities111
 3,340
 2,265
 (3,486) 2,230
Total liabilities10,474
 11,163
 28,984
 (26,297) 24,324
          
Equity:         
Stockholders’ equity9,798
 (10,513) 9,912
 601
 9,798
Noncontrolling interests
 
 2,682
 5,412
 8,094
Total equity9,798
 (10,513) 12,594
 6,013
 17,892
Total liabilities and equity$20,272
 $650
 $41,578
 $(20,284) $42,216
a.All U.S.-related deferred income taxes are recorded at the parent company.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2017

 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
ASSETS         
Current assets$75
 $671
 $10,670
 $(790) $10,626
Property, plant, equipment and mine development costs, net14
 11
 22,979
 (10) 22,994
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries19,570
 
 
 (19,570) 
Other assets943
 48
 3,182
 (491) 3,682
Total assets$20,602
 $730
 $36,831
 $(20,861) $37,302
          
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY         
Current liabilities$1,683
 $220
 $3,949
 $(938) $4,914
Long-term debt, less current portion10,021
 6,512
 5,552
 (10,270) 11,815
Deferred income taxes748
a 

 2,915
 
 3,663
Environmental and asset retirement obligations, less current portion
 201
 3,401
 
 3,602
Investments in consolidated subsidiary
 853
 10,397
 (11,250) 
Other liabilities173
 3,340
 1,987
 (3,488) 2,012
Total liabilities12,625
 11,126
 28,201
 (25,946) 26,006
          
Equity:         
Stockholders’ equity7,977
 (10,396) 5,916
 4,480
 7,977
Noncontrolling interests
 
 2,714
 605
 3,319
Total equity7,977
 (10,396) 8,630
 5,085
 11,296
Total liabilities and equity$20,602
 $730
 $36,831
 $(20,861) $37,302
a.
All U.S.-related deferred income taxes are recorded at the parent company.


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Year Ended December 31, 2018         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Revenues$
 $59
 $18,569
 $
 $18,628
Total costs and expenses28
 58

13,798

(10) 13,874
Operating (loss) income(28) 1
 4,771
 10
 4,754
Interest expense, net(388) (301) (734) 478
 (945)
Net gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt7
 2
 (2) 
 7
Other income (expense), net477
 
 77
 (478) 76
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings (losses)68
 (298) 4,112
 10
 3,892
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes(176) 61
 (874) (2) (991)
Equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings (losses)2,710
 10
 (219) (2,493) 8
Net income (loss) from continuing operations2,602
 (227) 3,019
 (2,485) 2,909
Net loss from discontinued operations
 
 (15) 
 (15)
Net income (loss)2,602
 (227) 3,004
 (2,485) 2,894
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 (68) (224) (292)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$2,602
 $(227) $2,936
 $(2,709) $2,602
          
Other comprehensive (loss) income(33) 
 (33) 33
 (33)
Total comprehensive income (loss)$2,569
 $(227) $2,903
 $(2,676) $2,569

Year Ended December 31, 2017         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Revenues$
 $52
 $16,351
 $
 $16,403
Total costs and expenses39
 78

12,586

10
 12,713
Operating (loss) income(39) (26) 3,765
 (10) 3,690
Interest expense, net(467) (227) (455) 348
 (801)
Net gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt22
 5
 (6) 
 21
Other income (expense), net336
 
 4
 (348) (8)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings (losses)(148) (248) 3,308
 (10) 2,902
Benefit from (Provision for) income taxes220
 (108) (998) 3
 (883)
Equity in affiliated companies’ net earnings (losses)1,745
 10
 (337) (1,408) 10
Net income (loss) from continuing operations1,817
 (346) 1,973
 (1,415) 2,029
Net income from discontinued operations
 
 66
 
 66
Net income (loss)1,817
 (346) 2,039
 (1,415) 2,095
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests:         
Continuing operations
 
 (150) (124) (274)
Discontinued operations
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$1,817
 $(346) $1,885
 $(1,539) $1,817
          
Other comprehensive income (loss)61
 
 61
 (61) 61
Total comprehensive income (loss)$1,878
 $(346) $1,946
 $(1,600) $1,878




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Year Ended December 31, 2016         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Revenues$
 $379
 $14,451
 $
 $14,830
Total costs and expenses72
 3,074
a 
14,403
a 
10
 17,559
Operating (loss) income(72) (2,695) 48
 (10) (2,729)
Interest expense, net(534) (56) (498) 333
 (755)
Net gain on early extinguishment of debt26
 
 
 
 26
Other income (expense), net268
 
 10
 (292) (14)
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in affiliated companies’ net (losses) earnings(312) (2,751) (440) 31
 (3,472)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes(2,233) 1,053
 821
 (12) (371)
Equity in affiliated companies’ net (losses) earnings(1,609) (3,101) (4,790) 9,511
 11
Net (loss) income from continuing operations(4,154) (4,799) (4,409) 9,530
 (3,832)
Net income from discontinued operations
 
 (154) (39) (193)
Net (loss) income(4,154) (4,799) (4,563) 9,491
 (4,025)
Net income and gain on redemption and preferred dividends attributable to noncontrolling interests:         
Continuing operations
 
 
 (66) (66)
Discontinued operations
 
 (63) 
 (63)
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders$(4,154) $(4,799) $(4,626) $9,425
 $(4,154)
          
Other comprehensive (loss) income(45) 
 (45) 45
 (45)
Total comprehensive (loss) income$(4,199) $(4,799) $(4,671) $9,470
 $(4,199)
a.Includes impairment charges totaling $1.5 billion at the FM O&G LLC Guarantor and $2.8 billion at the non-guarantor subsidiaries related to ceiling test impairment charges for FCX’s oil and gas properties pursuant to full cost accounting rules and a goodwill impairment charge.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31, 2018         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(40) $(487) $4,390
 $
 $3,863
          
Cash flow from investing activities:         
Capital expenditures(2) 
 (1,969) 
 (1,971)
Acquisition of PT Rio Tinto Indonesia
 
 (3,500) 
 (3,500)
Intercompany loans(832) 
 
 832
 
Dividends from (investments in) consolidated subsidiaries2,475
 
 84
 (2,559) 
Asset sales and other, net460
 6
 (13) 
 453
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities2,101
 6
 (5,398) (1,727) (5,018)
          
Cash flow from financing activities:         
Proceeds from debt
 
 632
 
 632
Repayments of debt(1,826) (53) (838) 
 (2,717)
Intercompany loans
 526
 306
 (832) 
Proceeds from sale of PT Freeport Indonesia shares
 
 3,710
 (210) 3,500
Cash dividends paid and distributions received, net(217) 
 (3,032) 2,753
 (496)
Other, net(18) 
 (17) 16
 (19)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(2,061) 473
 761
 1,727
 900
          
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents
 (8) (247) 
 (255)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year
 8
 4,702
 
 4,710
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year$
 $
 $4,455
 $
 $4,455


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


Year Ended December 31, 2017         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(156) $(467) $5,289
 $
 $4,666
          
Cash flow from investing activities:         
Capital expenditures
 (25) (1,385) 
 (1,410)
Intercompany loans(777) 
 
 777
 
Dividends from (investments in) consolidated subsidiaries3,226
 (15) 120
 (3,331) 
Asset sales and other, net
 57
 32
 
 89
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities2,449
 17
 (1,233) (2,554) (1,321)
          
Cash flow from financing activities:         
Proceeds from debt
 
 955
 
 955
Repayments of debt(2,281) (205) (1,326) 
 (3,812)
Intercompany loans
 663
 114
 (777) 
Cash dividends and distributions paid, including redemption(2) 
 (3,440) 3,266
 (176)
Other, net(10) (10) (67) 65
 (22)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(2,293) 448
 (3,764) 2,554
 (3,055)
          
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents
 (2) 292
 
 290
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year
 10
 4,410
 
 4,420
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year$
 $8
 $4,702
 $
 $4,710

Year Ended December 31, 2016         
 FCX FM O&G LLC Non-guarantor   Consolidated
 Issuer Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations FCX
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(137) $(263) $4,135
 $2
 $3,737
          
Cash flow from investing activities:         
Capital expenditures
 (567) (2,248) 2
 (2,813)
Intercompany loans481
 (346) 
 (135) 
Dividends from (investments in) consolidated subsidiaries1,469
 (45) 176
 (1,600) 
Asset sales and other, net2
 1,673
 4,695
 (4) 6,366
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities1,952
 715
 2,623
 (1,737) 3,553
          
Cash flow from financing activities:         
Proceeds from debt1,721
 
 1,960
 
 3,681
Repayments of debt(5,011) 
 (2,614) 
 (7,625)
Intercompany loans
 (332) 197
 135
 
Net proceeds from sale of common stock

1,515
 
 3,388
 (3,388) 1,515
Cash dividends and distributions paid(6) (107) (5,555) 4,969
 (699)
Other, net(34) (3) (20) 19
 (38)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(1,815) (442) (2,644) 1,735
 (3,166)
          
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents
 10
 4,114
 
 4,124
Increase in cash and cash equivalents in assets held for sale
 
 (45) 
 (45)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
 341
 
 341
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year$
 $10
 $4,410
 $
 $4,420


NOTE 18.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
FCX evaluated events after December 31, 2018, and through the date the financial statements were issued, and determined any events or transactions occurring during this period that would require recognition or disclosure are appropriately addressed in these financial statements.

NOTE 19.  QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Year 
2018          
Revenues$4,868
 $5,168
 $4,908
 $3,684
 $18,628
 
Operating income1,459
 1,664
 1,315
 316
 4,754
 
Net income from continuing operations828
 1,039
 668
 374
 2,909
 
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations(11) (4) (4) 4
 (15) 
Net income817
 1,035
 664
 378
 2,894
 
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations(125) (166) (108) 107
 (292) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders692
 869
 556
 485
 2,602
 
           
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:          
Continuing operations$0.48
 $0.60

$0.38

$0.33

$1.80
 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 
 
 
 (0.01) 
 $0.47
 $0.60
 $0.38
 $0.33
 $1.79
 
           
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding1,449
 1,449
 1,450
 1,450
 1,449
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:          
Continuing operations$0.48
 $0.59
 $0.38
 $0.33
 $1.79
 
Discontinued operations(0.01) 
 
 
 (0.01) 
 $0.47
 $0.59
 $0.38
 $0.33
 $1.78
 
           
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding1,458
 1,458
 1,458
 1,457
 1,458
 
           
Following summarizes significant charges (credits) included in FCX’s net income attributable to common stockholders for the 2018 quarters:
Netlabor-related charges at Cerro Verde related to Peruvian government claims for disputed royalties (referagreements reached with its hourly employees.
c.Includes charges totaling $340 million associated with unfavorable ARO change. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion) totaled $195discussion.
d.Includes charges associated with the major maintenance turnaround at the Miami Smelter totaling $87 million.
e.Includes a $60 million gain on the sale of FCX’s remaining cobalt business located in Kokkola, Finland. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
f.Includes net income attributabletax benefits of $189 million associated with the release of a portion of the valuation allowance recorded against PT Rio Tinto NOLs. Refer to common stockholders or $0.13 per shareNote 11 for further discussion.
g.Includes capital expenditures for the year (consistingIndonesia smelter projects of $14$222 million.

169


North America Copper MinesSouth America Mining     
AtlanticCorporate,
CopperOther
CerroIndonesiaMolybdenumRod &Smelting& Elimi-FCX
MorenciOtherTotalVerdeOtherTotalMiningMinesRefining& RefiningnationsTotal
Year Ended December 31, 2020           
Revenues:            
Unaffiliated customers$29 $48 $77 $2,282 $431 $2,713 $3,534 $— $4,781 $2,020 $1,073 a$14,198 
Intersegment2,015 2,272 4,287 242 — 242 80 222 33 17 (4,881)— 
Production and delivery1,269 1,831 3,100 1,599 379 1,978 1,606 230 4,819 1,962 (3,664)10,031 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization166 189 355 367 54 421 580 57 16 29 70 1,528 
Metals inventory adjustments48 52 — — 10 — 28 96 
Selling, general and administrative expenses— 108 — — 21 231 370 
Mining exploration and research expenses— — — — — — — — 48 50 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs— (1)(1)— — — — — — 159 b159 
Net gain on sales of assets— — — — — — — — — — (473)c(473)
Operating income (loss)603 249 852 552 d(5)547 1,320 (75)(25)d25 (207)d2,437 d
Interest expense, net— 139 — 139 39 e— — 412 598 
Provision for income taxes— — — 238 239 606 — — 97 f944 
Total assets at December 31, 20202,574 5,163 7,737 8,474 1,678 10,152 16,918 1,760 211 877 4,489 42,144 
Capital expenditures102 326 428 141 42 183 1,161 19 29 135 g1,961 
a.Includes revenues from FCX’s molybdenum sales company, which includes sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.
b.Includes charges totaling $130 million associated with a framework for the resolution of all current and future potential talc-related litigation. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
c.Includes a $486 million gain associated with the sale of FCX’s interests in the Kisanfu undeveloped project. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.
d.Includes charges totaling $258 million associated with (i) idle facility costs (Cerro Verde), contract cancellation and other charges directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) the April 2020 revised operating plans (including employee separation costs). These charges were primarily recorded in the Cerro Verde segment ($89 million), Corporate, Other & Eliminations ($57 million) and the Rod & Refining segment ($30 million).
e.Includes charges totaling $35 million associated with PT-FI's historical contested tax audits. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
f.Includes tax charges totaling $135 million associated with the sale of the Kisanfu undeveloped project, partly offset by tax credits of $53 million associated with the reversal of a year-end 2019 tax charge related to the sale of FCX’s interest in the lower zone of the Timok exploration project.
g.Includes capital expenditures for the Indonesia smelter projects of $105 million.









170

North America Copper MinesSouth America Mining     
AtlanticCorporate,
CopperOther
CerroIndonesiaMolybdenumRod &Smelting& Elimi-FCX
MorenciOtherTotalVerdeOtherTotalMiningMinesRefining& RefiningnationsTotal
Year Ended December 31, 2019           
Revenues:            
Unaffiliated customers$143 $224 $367 $2,576 $499 $3,075 $2,713 a$— $4,457 $2,063 $1,727 b$14,402 
Intersegment1,864 2,155 4,019 313 — 

313 58 344 26 (4,765)— 
Production and delivery1,376 1,943 3,319 1,852 474 2,326 2,055 c299 4,475 1,971 (2,911)

11,534 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization171 178 349 406 68 474 406 62 28 84 1,412 
Metals inventory adjustments29 30 — 50 — — 92 179 
Selling, general and administrative expenses— 125 — — 20 237 394 
Mining exploration and research expenses— — — — — — — — 102 104 
Environmental obligations and shutdown costs— — — — — — — — 104 105 
Net gain on sales of assets— — — — — — — — — — (417)d(417)
Operating income (loss)456 225 681 621 (43)578 180 (67)(1)49 (329)1,091 
Interest expense, net114 — 114 82 c— — 22 398 620 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes— — — 250 (11)239 167 c— — 99 e510 
Total assets at December 31, 20192,880 5,109 7,989 8,612 1,676 10,288 16,345 1,798 193 761 3,435 

40,809 
Capital expenditures231 646 877 232 24 256 1,369 19 34 92 

2,652 
a.Includes charges totaling $155 million associated with an unfavorable Indonesia Supreme Court ruling related to PT-FI export duties. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
b.Includes revenues from FCX’s molybdenum sales company, which includes sales of molybdenum produced by the Molybdenum mines and by certain of the North America and South America copper mines.
c.Includes net charges totaling $28 million in production and delivery costs $370 millionfor an adjustment to interest expense, $22 million to other expense, netthe settlement of income tax benefits of $35 million and noncontrolling interests of $176 million), most of which was recorded in the fourth quarter.
Net charges at PT-FI totaled $223 million ($110 million to net income attributable to common stockholders or $0.08 per share) consisting of charges to production and delivery of $69 million forhistorical surface water tax disputesmatters with the local regional tax authority in Papua,Indonesia,$32 and $78 million for assessments of prior period permit fees with the MOEF, $72 million for disputed payroll withholding taxes for prior yearsin interest expense and other tax settlements and $62 million to write-off certain previously capitalized project costs for the new smelter in Indonesia in fourth quarter, partly offset by inventory adjustments of $12 million recorded in second quarter. The fourth quarter also included $43$103 million of inventory adjustments at PT-FI related to prior 2018 quarterly periods.
Nettax charges at Cerro Verde related to Cerro Verde’s new three-year collective bargaining agreement totaled $69 million ($22 millionto netin provision for income attributable to common stockholders or $0.02 per share) for the year, which was recorded in the third quarter.
Net adjustments to environmental obligations and related litigation reserves totaled $57 millionto operating income and net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.04per share) for the year, most of which was recorded in the second quarter.


Net gains on sales of assets for the year totaled $208 millionto operating income and net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.14per share), mostlytaxes associated with adjustmentsPT-FI’s historical contested tax disputes. Refer to assets no longer classified as heldNote 12 for sale, adjustments to the fair value of contingent consideration related to the 2016 sale of onshore California oil and gas properties (which will continue to be adjusted through December 31, 2020) andfurther discussion.
d.Includes net gains totaling $343 million associated with the sale of Port Carteret (assets held for sale), and included $11 millionFCX’s interest in the first quarter, $45lower zone of the Timok exploration project and $59 million infor the second quarter, $70 million in the third quarter and $82 millionin the fourth quarter.sale of a portion of Freeport Cobalt. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of asset dispositions.
discussion.
Other nete.Includes tax charges for the year totaled $50totaling $53 million ($30 million to net income attributable to common stockholders or $0.02 per share), including prior period depreciation expense at Freeport Cobalt that was suspended while it was classified as held for sale ($48 million in fourth-quarter and $31 million for the year).
Net tax credits for the year totaled $632 million ($574 million net of noncontrolling interest or $0.39 per share), primarily associated with a reductionthe sale of FCX’s interest in PT-FI’s statutory ratesthe lower zone of the Timok exploration project and $49 million primarily to adjust deferred taxes on historical balance sheet items in accordance with the IUPK ($504 million) and benefits associated with U.S. tax reform ($123 million), most of which was recorded in the fourth quarter. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion.accounting principles.
In November 2016, FCX completed the sale of its interest in TFHL (refer to Note 2 for further discussion), and, in accordance with accounting guidance, reported the results of operations of TFHL as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Net (loss) income from discontinued operations for the 2018 periods primarily reflects adjustments to the fair value of the potential contingent consideration related to the sale, which will continue to be adjusted through December 31, 2019.












171
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Year 
2017          
Revenues$3,341
 $3,711
 $4,310
 $5,041
 $16,403
 
Operating income597
 686
 928
 1,479
 3,690
 
Net income from continuing operations268
 326
 242
 1,193
 2,029
 
Net income from discontinued operations38
 9
 3
 16
 66
 
Net income306
 335
 245
 1,209
 2,095
 
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:          
Continuing operations(75) (66) 35
 (168) (274) 
Discontinued operations(3) (1) 
 
 (4) 
Net income attributable to common stockholders228
 268
 280
 1,041
 1,817
 
           
Basic net income per share attributable to common stockholders:          
Continuing operations$0.13
 $0.18
 $0.19
 $0.71
 $1.21
 
Discontinued operations0.03
 
 
 0.01
 0.04
 
 $0.16
 $0.18
 $0.19
 $0.72
 $1.25
 
           
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding1,446
 1,447
 1,448
 1,448
 1,447
 
           
Diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders:          
Continuing operations$0.13
 $0.18
 $0.19
 $0.70
 $1.21
 
Discontinued operations0.03
 
 
 0.01
 0.04
 
 $0.16
 $0.18
 $0.19
 $0.71
 $1.25
 
           
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding1,454
 1,453
 1,454
 1,455
 1,454
 
           
Following summarizes significant charges (credits) included in FCX’s net income attributable to common stockholders for the 2017 quarters:

Net charges at Cerro Verde related to Peruvian government claims for disputed royalties (refer to Note 12 for further discussion) totaled$186 million to net income attributable to common stockholders or $0.13 per share for the year (consistingTable of $203 millionto operating income, $145 millionto interest expense and $7 millionto provision for income taxes, net of $169 million to noncontrolling interests), most of which was recorded in the third quarter.Contents


Net charges associated with PT-FI workforce reductions for the year totaled $125 million to operating income ($66 million to net income attributable to common stockholders or $0.04 per share) and included $21 million in the first quarter, $87 million in the second quarter, $9 million in the third quarter and $8 million in the fourth quarter.
Net adjustments to environmental obligations and related litigation reserves totaled $210 million to operating income and net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.14 per share) for the year, and included net charges (credits) of $19 million in the first quarter, $(30) million in the second quarter, $64 million in the third quarter and $157 million in the fourth quarter.
Net gains on sales of assets totaled $81 millionto operating income and net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.06 per share) for the year, mostly associated with sales of oil and gas properties, and included $23 million in the first quarter, $10 million in the second quarter, $33 million in the third quarter and $15 millionin the fourth quarter. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of asset dispositions.
Net tax credits totaled $438 million to net income attributable to common stockholders ($0.30per share) for the year, primarily associated with provisional tax credits associated with U.S. tax reform ($393 million), which were recorded in the fourth quarter. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion.
Net income from discontinued operations for the 2017 periods primarily reflected adjustments to the fair value of the potential contingent consideration related to the 2016 TFHL sale.

NOTE 20.17.  SUPPLEMENTARY MINERAL RESERVE INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves as of December 31, 2021, have been calculated asprepared using industry accepted practice and conform to the disclosure requirements under Subpart 1300 of December 31, 2018, in accordance with Industry Guide 7 as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.SEC Regulation S-K. FCX’s proven and probable mineral reserves may not be comparable to similar information regarding mineral reserves disclosed in accordance with the guidance in other countries. Proven and probable mineral reserves were determined by the use of mapping, drilling, sampling, assaying and evaluation methods generally applied in the mining industry, as more fully discussed below. The term “reserve,”industry. Mineral reserves, as used in the reserve data presented here, meansmean an estimate of tonnage and grade of measured and indicated mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. Proven mineral reserves are the economically mineable part of a measured mineral deposit that can be economicallyresource. To classify an estimate as a proven mineral reserve, the qualified person must possess a high degree of confidence of tonnage, grade and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The term “proven reserves” means reserves for which (i) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; (ii) grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (iii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurements are spaced so closely and the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth andquality. Probable mineral content of reserves are well established.the economically mineable part of an indicated or, in some cases, a measured mineral resource. The term “probable reserves” means reserves for which quantityqualified person’s level of confidence will be lower in determining a probable mineral reserve than it would be in determining a proven mineral reserve. To classify an estimate as a probable mineral reserve, the qualified person’s confidence must still be sufficient to demonstrate that extraction is economically viable considering reasonable investment and grade are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves but the sites for sampling are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.market assumptions.


FCX’s mineral reserve estimates are based on the latest available geological and geotechnical studies. FCX conducts ongoing studies of its ore bodies to optimize economic values and to manage risk. FCX revises its mine plans and estimates of proven and probable mineral reserves as required in accordance with the latest available studies.


Estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves at December 31, 2018,2021, were determined using $2.50metals price assumptions of $2.50 per pound for copper, in North America and South America and $2.00 per pound for copper in Indonesia, $1,000$1,200 per ounce for gold and $10$10 per pound for molybdenum. Reserves for Indonesia would not significantly change if assessed under a long-term price of $2.50 per pound of copper as PT-FI’s reserve plan is mill-constrained by the term of its IUPK, which contains rights to extend mining rights through 2041.

For the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, LME copper settlement prices averaged $2.65$3.25 per pound, LBMALondon PM gold prices averaged $1,259$1,654 per ounce and the weekly average price for molybdenum quoted by Metals Week averaged $8.85$11.97 per pound.



The recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves presented in the table below represent the estimated metal quantities from which FCX expects to be paid after application of estimated metallurgical recovery ratesrecoveries and smelter recovery rates,recoveries, where applicable. Recoverable
Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
at December 31, 2021
Coppera
(billion pounds)
Gold
(million ounces)
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
North America43.0 0.5 2.69 
South America31.9 — 0.69 
Indonesiab
32.2 26.6 — 
Consolidated basisc,d
107.2 27.1 3.39 
Net equity interestb,e
76.2 14.2 3.06 
a.Estimated consolidated recoverable copper reserves are that part of a mineral deposit that FCX estimates can be economicallyincluded 1.8 billion pounds in leach stockpiles and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.0.3 billion pounds in mill stockpiles.
 
Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

 at December 31, 2018
 
Coppera
(billion pounds)
 
Gold
(million ounces)
 
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
North America49.9
 0.6
 3.06
South America33.5
 
 0.72
Indonesia36.2
b 
30.2
b 

Consolidatedc
119.6
 30.8
 3.78
      
Net equity interestd
86.8
 17.0
 3.44
a.
Estimated consolidated recoverable copper reserves included 2.0 billion pounds in leach stockpiles and 0.6 billion pounds in mill stockpiles.
b.
Includes 13.0 billion pounds of copper and 10.1 million ounces of gold associated with PT-FI's acquisition of the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest. b.Estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves from Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through 2041. As a result, PT-FI’s current long-term mine plan and planned operations are based on the assumption that PT-FI will abide by the terms and conditions of the IUPK and will be granted the 10-year extension from 2031 through 2041 (refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK). As a result, PT-FI will not mine all of these mineral reserves during the initial term of the IUPK. Prior to the end of 2031, PT-FI expects to mine 48 percent of aggregate proven and probable recoverable mineral reserves at December 31, 2021, representing 53 percent of FCX’s net equity share of recoverable copper reserves and 55 percent of FCX’s net equity share of recoverable gold reserves.
c.Consolidated mineral reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for joint venture partner interests at the Morenci mine in North America (refer to Note 3 for further discussion). Excluded from the table above were FCX’s estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves of 346 million ounces of silver, which were determined using $15 per ounce.
d.May not foot because of rounding.
e.Net equity interest mineral reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of FCX’s ownership in subsidiaries). FCX's net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent for 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041. Excluded from the table above were FCX’s estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves of 230 million ounces of silver.
172

Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
at December 31, 2021
Average Ore Grade
Per Metric Tona
Recoverable Proven and
Probable Mineral Reservesb
Orea
(million metric tons)
Copper (%)Gold (grams)Molybdenum (%)Copper
(billion pounds)
Gold
(million ounces)
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
North America         
Production stage:        
Morenci3,918 0.23 —  — c13.1 —  0.15 
Sierrita2,430 0.23 — c0.02 10.3 0.1  1.02 
Bagdad2,534 0.32 — c0.02 15.5 0.2  0.92 
Safford, including Lone Star685 0.45 — — 5.2 —  — 
Chino, including Cobre308 0.44 0.03 — 2.5 0.3  — 
Climax151 — —  0.15 — —  0.46 
Henderson54 — —  0.16 — —  0.17 
Tyrone19 0.28 —  — 0.2 —  — 
Miami— — —  — — c—  — 
South America         
Production stage:        
Cerro Verde3,999 0.36 —  0.01 27.9 —  0.69 
El Abra732 0.42 —  — 4.1 —  — 
Indonesiad
        
Production stage:      
Grasberg Block Cave857 1.06 0.71  — 16.7 12.6  — 
Deep Mill Level Zone412 0.85 0.73  — 6.6 7.6  — 
Big Gossan51 2.26 0.97  — 2.3 1.1  — 
Development stage:        
Kucing Liar351 1.03 0.91  — 6.6 5.3  — 
Total 100% basise
16,501 110.8 27.1 3.43 
Consolidated basisf
     107.2 27.1  3.39 
FCX’s net equity interestg
     76.2 14.2  3.06 
a.Excludes material contained in stockpiles.
b.Includes estimated recoverable metals contained in stockpiles.
c.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
d.Estimated recoverable proven and probable mineral reserves from Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through 2041. Refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.
c.
Consolidated reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for joint venture partner interests at the Morenci mine in North America (refer to Note 3 for further discussion). Excluded from the table above were FCX’s estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves of 393.1 million ounces of silver, which were determined using $15 per ounce and include 55.7 million ounces associated with PT-FI's acquisition of the Rio Tinto Joint Venture interest.
d.Net equity interest reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for further discussion of FCX’s ownership in subsidiaries). FCX's net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent from 2019 through 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041. Excluded from the table above were FCX’s estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves of 269.3 million ounces of silver.

  Estimated Recoverable Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
  at December 31, 2018
    
Average Ore Grade
Per Metric Tona
 
Recoverable Proven and
Probable Reservesb
  
Orea
(million metric tons)
 Copper (%) Gold (grams) Molybdenum (%) 
Copper
(billion pounds)
 
Gold
(million ounces)
 
Molybdenum
(billion pounds)
North America              
Developed and producing:            
Morenci 4,619
 0.24
 
 
c 
15.6
 
 0.18
Sierrita 3,369
 0.23
 
c 
0.02
 14.0
 0.2
 1.42
Bagdad 2,426
 0.32
 
c 
0.02
 14.7
 0.1
 0.74
Safford, including
Lone Star
d
 839
 0.44
 
 
 6.2
 
 
Chino, including Cobre 395
 0.46
 0.03
 0.01
 3.4
 0.3
 0.01
Climax 168
 
 
 0.15
 
 
 0.52
Henderson 71
 
 
 0.17
 
 
 0.24
Tyrone 55
 0.25
 
 
 0.3
 
 
Miami 
 
 
 
 0.1
 
 
               
South America              
Developed and producing:            
Cerro Verde 4,324
 0.35
 
 0.01
 29.6
 
 0.72
El Abra 705
 0.42
 
 
 3.9
 
 
               
Indonesiae
              
Developed and producing:          
Deep Mill Level Zone 432
 0.92
 0.76
 
 7.6
 8.4
 
Deep Ore Zone 51
 0.50
 0.57
 
 0.5
 0.8
 
Big Gossan 57
 2.30
 1.02
 
 2.6
 1.3
 
Grasberg open pit 5
 1.26
 1.98
 
 0.2
 0.4
 
               
Under development:              
Grasberg Block Cave

 963
 0.96
 0.72
 
 17.2
 14.1
 
               
Undeveloped:              
Kucing Liar 349
 1.24
 1.03
 
 8.1
 5.2
 
Total 100% basis 18,828
       124.0
 30.8
 3.83
Consolidatedf
         119.6
 30.8
 3.78
FCX’s equity shareg
         86.8
 17.0
 3.44
a.Excludes material contained in stockpiles.
b.Includes estimated recoverable metals contained in stockpiles.
c.Amounts not shown because of rounding.
d.The Lone Star oxide project is under development.
e.Estimated recoverable proven and probable reserves from Indonesia reflect estimates of minerals that can be recovered through 2041. Refer to Note 13 for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.
f.Consolidated reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for joint venture partner interests at the Morenci mine in North America. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.
g.Net equity interest reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for noncontrolling interest ownership. FCX's net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects an approximate 81 percent from 2019 through 2022 and 48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion of FCX’s ownership in subsidiaries.


NOTE 21.  SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Following the sales of substantially all of FCX’s oil and gas properties, including the sale of its Deepwater GOM, onshore California and Haynesville oil and gas properties in 2016, along with the sales of its property interests in the Madden area in central Wyoming and certain property interests in the GOM Shelf in 2017 and 2018, FCX’s oil and gas producing activities are not considered significant beginning in 2017. Refer to Note 213 for discussion of PT-FI’s IUPK.
e.Totals may not foot because of rounding.
f.Consolidated mineral reserves represent estimated metal quantities after reduction for Morenci’s joint venture partner interests (refer to Note 3 for further discussion.discussion).

Costs Incurred. A summary of the costs incurredg.Net equity interest mineral reserves represent estimated consolidated metal quantities further reduced for FCX’s oil and gas acquisition, exploration and development activitiesnoncontrolling interest ownership (refer to Note 3 for the year ended December 31, 2016, follows:
Property acquisition costs for unproved properties$7
Exploration costs22
Development costs749
 $778
These amounts included increases in AROs of $37 million, capitalized general and administrative expenses of $78 million, and capitalized interest of $7 million.

Capitalized Costs. The aggregate capitalized costs subject to amortization for oil and gas properties and the aggregate related accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2016, follow:
Properties subject to amortization $27,507
Accumulated amortizationa
 (27,433)
  $74
a.
Includes charges of$4.3 billion in 2016 to reduce the carrying value of oil and gas properties pursuant to full cost accounting rules.

The average amortization rate per barrel of oil equivalents (BOE) was $17.58 in 2016.

Costs Not Subject to Amortization. Including amounts determined to be impaired, FCX transferred $4.9 billion of costs associated with unevaluated properties to the full cost pool in 2016. Sales of unevaluated properties totaled $1.6 billion in 2016. Following FCX’s disposition of its Deepwater GOM and onshore California oil and gas properties in fourth-quarter 2016, the carrying value of allfurther discussion of FCX’s remaining oilownership in subsidiaries). FCX’s net equity interest for estimated metal quantities in Indonesia reflects approximately 81 percent for 2022 and gas properties was included in the amortization base at December 31, 2018, and 2017.48.76 percent from 2023 through 2041.

Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities. The results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, presented below, excludes non-oil and gas revenues, general and administrative expenses, interest expense and interest income. Income tax benefit was determined by applying the statutory rates to pre-tax operating results:
173
Revenues from oil and gas producing activities$1,513
Production and delivery costsa
(1,829)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(839)
Impairment of oil and gas properties(4,317)
Income tax benefit (based on FCX’s U.S. federal statutory tax rate)b

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities$(5,472)
a.Includes $926 million in charges related to drillship settlements/idle rig and contract termination costs.
b.FCX has provided a full valuation allowance on losses associated with oil and gas activities.




Management believes the reserve estimates presented herein are reasonable and prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC as prescribed in Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10. However, there are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities and values of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and the amount and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond FCX’s control. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating the recovery from underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Because all oil and natural gas reserve estimates are to some degree subjective, the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered, production and operating costs, the amount and timing of future development expenditures, and future crude oil and natural gas sales prices may all differ from those assumed in these estimates. In addition, different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserve quantities and cash flows based upon the same available data. Therefore, the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (Standardized Measure) shown below represents estimates only and should not be construed as the current market value of the estimated reserves attributable to FCX’s oil and gas properties. In this regard, the information set forth in the following tables includes revisions of reserve estimates attributable to proved properties acquired in the 2013 oil and gas acquisitions, and reflects additional information from subsequent development activities, production history of the properties involved and any adjustments in the projected economic life of such properties resulting from changes in product prices.

Estimated Quantities of Oil and Natural Gas Reserves. The following table sets forth certain data pertaining to proved, proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves, all of which are in the U.S., for the year ended December 31, 2016.
  Oil Gas Total
  
(MMBbls)a,b
 
(Bcf)a
 
(MMBOE)a
2016      
Proved reserves:      
Balance at beginning of year 207
 274
 252
Extensions and discoveries 
 
 
Acquisitions of reserves in-place 
 
 
Revisions of previous estimates 1
 
 1
Sale of reserves in-place (168) (118) (187)
Production (36) (69) (48)
Balance at end of year

 4
 87
 18
       
Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016 4
 87
 18
       
Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2016 
 
 
a.MMBbls = million barrels; Bcf = billion cubic feet; MMBOE = million BOE
b.Includes NGL proved reserves of 1 MMBbls (all developed) at December 31, 2016.

The average realized sales prices used in FCX’s reserve reports as of December 31, 2016, were $34.26 per barrel of crude oil and $2.40 per one thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of natural gas.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, FCX sold reserves in-place totaling 187 MMBOE, primarily representing all of its Deepwater GOM, onshore California and Haynesville properties.


Standardized Measure. The Standardized Measure (discounted at 10 percent) from production of proved oil and natural gas reserves has been developed in accordance with SEC guidelines. FCX estimated the quantity of proved oil and natural gas reserves and the future periods in which they were expected to be produced based on year-end economic conditions. Estimates of future net revenues from FCX’s proved oil and gas properties and the present value thereof were made using the twelve-month average of the first-day-of-the-month historical reference prices as adjusted for location and quality differentials, which were held constant throughout the life of the oil and gas properties, except where such guidelines permit alternate treatment, including the use of fixed and determinable contractual price escalations (excluding the impact of crude oil derivative contracts). Future gross revenues were reduced by estimated future operating costs (including production and ad valorem taxes) and future development and abandonment costs, all of which were based on current costs in effect at December 31, 2016, and held constant throughout the life of the oil and gas properties. Future income taxes were calculated by applying the statutory federal and state income tax rate to pre-tax future net cash flows, net of the tax basis of the respective oil and gas properties and utilization of FCX’s available tax carryforwards related to its oil and gas operations.

The Standardized Measure related to proved oil and natural gas reserves as of December 31, 2016, follows:
Future cash inflows$345
Future production expense(175)
Future development costsa
(439)
Future income tax expense
Future net cash flows(269)
Discounted at 10% per year32
Standardized Measure$(237)
a.
Includes estimated asset retirement costs of$0.4 billion at December 31, 2016.

A summary of the principal sources of changes in the Standardized Measure for the year ended December 31, 2016, follows:
Balance at beginning of year $1,392
Changes during the year:  
Sales, net of production expenses (831)
Net changes in sales and transfer prices, net of production expenses (341)
Extensions, discoveries and improved recoveries 
Changes in estimated future development costs, including timing and other 146
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year 295
Sales of reserves in-place (1,049)
Revisions of quantity estimates 12
Accretion of discount 139
Net change in income taxes 
Total changes (1,629)
Balance at end of year $(237)


Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.


Not applicable.


Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.


(a)           Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the participation of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on their evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.


(b)           Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2018,2021, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


(c)           Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the report thereon of Ernst & Young LLP are included herein under Item 8. “Financial Statements and SupplementalSupplementary Data.”


Item 9B.  Other Information.


Not applicable.


Item 9C.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.
PART III


Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.


The information set forth under the captions “Information About Director Nominees”Nominees,” “Board Committees,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”“Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial Experts,” and “Corporate Governance Guidelines; Principles of Business Conduct,” of our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), relating to our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by Item 10 regarding our executive officers appears in a separately captioned heading after Item 4. “Executive Officers of the Registrant”“Information About our Executive Officers” in Part I of this report.


Item 11.  Executive Compensation.


The information set forth under the captions “Director Compensation” and “Executive Officer Compensation” of our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.


The information set forth under the captions “Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” of our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.


Equity Compensation Plan Information
Only our 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, (2016 plan), which was previously approved by our stockholders, has shares of our common stock available for future grant. However, we have equity compensation plans pursuant to which awards have previously been made that could result in issuance of our common stock to employees and non-employees as compensation, including plans that were assumed in connection with the acquisitioncompensation.


174


The following table presents information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018.2021:
Number of Securities To be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders29,954,073 a$23.74 30,713,851 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders157,545 b$27.00 — 
   Total30,111,618 $23.76 30,713,851 
 Number of Securities To be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and RightsNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
 (a) (b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders51,833,605
a 
$27.45
58,584,822
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders3,233,353
b 
26.70

Total
55,066,958
 27.40
58,584,822


a.Includes shares of our common stock issuable upon the vesting of 1,907,819 RSUs and 5,149,375 performance share units (PSUs) at maximum performance levels, and the termination of deferrals with respect to 1,189,900 RSUs that were vested as of December 31, 2018. These awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price. The number of securities to be issued in column (a) does not include RSUs granted under our phantom stock plan, which are payable solely in cash.
b.Represents securities to be issued under awards assumed in our acquisitions of McMoRan Exploration Co. Includes shares issuable upon the vesting of 13,500 RSUs that were assumed in prior acquisitions. These awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price.

a.Includes shares of our common stock issuable upon the vesting of 3,338,781 restricted stock units (RSUs) and 3,875,625 performance share units at maximum performance levels, and the termination of deferrals with respect to 1,197,900 RSUs that were vested as of December 31, 2021. These awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price. The number of securities to be issued in column (a) does not include RSUs that are payable solely in cash.
b.Represents securities to be issued under awards assumed in our acquisition of McMoRan Exploration Co. and includes shares issuable upon the termination of deferrals with respect to 13,500 RSUs that were vested as of December 31, 2021, which awards are not reflected in column (b) because they do not have an exercise price.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.


The information set forth under the captions “Certain Transactions” and “Board and Committee Independence”Independence; Audit Committee Financial Experts” of our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC, relating to our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.


The information set forth under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC (including fees billed to us by Ernst & Young, PCAOB ID No. 42), relating to our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.

.
PART IV


Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.


(a)(1).                      Financial Statements.


The consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and equity, and the consolidated balance sheets are included as part of Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”



(a)(2).                      Financial Statement Schedules.


The following financial statement schedule is presented below.


Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts


Schedules other than the one above have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable or the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.


175

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OFTo the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statement Schedule


We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017, and2020, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and have issued our report thereon dated February 15, 2019 (included2022 included elsewhere in this Form 10-K).10-K. Our audits alsoof the consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15 (a)(2) as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects the information set forth therein.

Basis for Opinion

10-K (the “schedule”). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s schedule based on our audits. We believe that

In our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when considered in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
February 15, 20192022


SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (In millions)
  Additions (Deductions)   
 Balance atCharged toCharged toOther Balance at
 Beginning ofCosts andOther(Deductions) End of
 YearExpenseAccountsAdditions Year
Reserves and allowances deducted      
from asset accounts:      
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets      
Year Ended December 31, 2021$4,732 $(596)a$(49)b$— 

$4,087 
Year Ended December 31, 20204,576 200 c(16)b(28)d4,732 
Year Ended December 31, 20194,507 50 e19 b— 

4,576 
Reserves for non-income taxes:      
Year Ended December 31, 2021$82 $18 $— $(41)f$59 
Year Ended December 31, 202058 21 (1)f82 
Year Ended December 31, 201962 — — (4)f58 
a.Primarily relates to a $219 million decrease associated with U.S. federal net operating losses (NOLs) utilized during 2021, a $105 million decrease related to expiration of U.S. foreign tax credits, and a $228 million decrease associated with PT Rio Tinto NOLs resulting from positive evidence supporting future taxable income against which NOLs can be used.
b.Relates to a valuation allowance for tax benefits primarily associated with actuarial (gains) losses for U.S. defined benefit plans included in other comprehensive income (loss).
c.Primarily relates to a $250 million increase in U.S. federal NOL carryforwards, partly offset by a $75 million decrease in U.S. foreign tax credits associated with expirations, and a $11 million decrease in U.S. deferred tax assets for which no benefit is expected to be realized.
d.Relates to sale of interest in Kisanfu.
e.Primarily relates to a $208 million increase in U.S. federal deferred tax assets for which no benefit is expected to be realized, partly offset by a $98 million decrease in U.S. foreign tax credits associated with expirations and prior-year adjustments, and a $44 million decrease in U.S. federal and state NOL carryforwards
f.Represents amounts paid or adjustments to reserves based on revised estimates.

176

    Additions (Deductions)    
  Balance at Charged to Charged to Other Balance at
  Beginning of Costs and Other Additions End of
  Year Expense Accounts (Deductions) Year
Reserves and allowances deducted          
from asset accounts:          
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets          
Year Ended December 31, 2018 $4,575
 $(345)
a 
$8
b 
$269
c 
$4,507
Year Ended December 31, 2017 6,058
 (1,484)
d 
1
b 

 4,575
Year Ended December 31, 2016 4,183
 1,852
 23
b 

 6,058
           
Reserves for non-income taxes:          
Year Ended December 31, 2018 $58
 $7
 $(1) $(2)
e 
$62
Year Ended December 31, 2017 64
 (2) 
 (4)
e 
58
Year Ended December 31, 2016 83
 13
 (3) (29)
e 
64
(a)(3).                      Exhibits.
a.Primarily relates to a $315 million decrease in U.S. foreign tax credits associated with expirations and 2017 tax reform adjustments, and a decrease of $45 million in U.S. federal net operating losses associated with 2018 usage and 2017 tax reform.
b.Relates to a valuation allowance for tax benefits primarily associated with actuarial losses for U.S. defined benefit plans included in other comprehensive income (loss).

Filed
c.ExhibitPrimarily relates to a $244 million increase in foreign net operating losses for which no benefit is expected to be realized resulting from PT-FI’s acquisition of PT Rio Tinto Indonesia.
with thisIncorporated by Reference
d.NumberRelates to a $1.1 billion decrease associated with a reduction in the corporate income tax rate applicable to U.S. federal deferred tax assets and $371 million for the reversal of valuation allowances on U.S. federal alternative minimum tax credits.
Exhibit Title
e.Form 10-KRepresents amounts paid or adjustments to reserves based on revised estimates.Form

(a)(3).                      Exhibits.
File No.Date Filed
Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 18, 2006, by and among FCX, Phelps Dodge Corporation and Panther Acquisition Corporation.8-K333-139252001-11307-0111/20/2006
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Plains Exploration & Production Company, FCX and IMONC LLC, dated as of December 5, 2012.8-K001-11307-0112/6/2012
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among McMoRan Exploration Co., FCX and INAVN Corp., dated as of December 5, 2012.8-K001-11307-0112/6/2012
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2014, among LMC Candelaria SpA, LMC Ojos del Salado SpA and Freeport Minerals Corporation.10-Q001-11307-0111/7/2014
Purchase Agreement dated February 15, 2016, between Sumitomo Metal Mining America Inc., Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Freeport-McMoRan Morenci Inc., Freeport Minerals Corporation, and FCX.8-K001-11307-012/16/2016
Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 9, 2016, among CMOC Limited, China Molybdenum Co., Ltd., Phelps Dodge Katanga Corporation and FCX.8-K001-11307-012/5/9/2016
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 12, 2016, between Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC, Freeport-McMoRan Exploration & Production LLC, Plains Offshore Operations Inc. and Anadarko US Offshore LLC.10-Q001-11307-0111/9/2016
PT-FI Divestment Agreement dated as of September 27, 2018 among FCX, International Support LLC, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT Indocopper Investama (subsequently renamed PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral) and PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero).10-Q001-11307-0111/9/2018
Supplemental and Amendment Agreement to the PT-FI Divestment Agreement, dated December 21, 2018, among FCX, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral (f/k/a PT Indocopper Investama), PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero) and International Support LLC.X10-K001-11307-012/15/2019


Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of FCX, effective as of June 8, 2016.8-K001-11307-016/9/2016
Amended and Restated By-Laws of FCX, effective as of June 8, 2016.3, 2020.8-K001-11307-016/9/20163/2020
Description of Common Stock of Freeport-McMoRan Inc.10-K001-11307-012/16/2021
Indenture dated as of February 13, 2012, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 3.55%4.55% Senior Notes due 2022,2024 and the 4.00%5.40% Senior Notes due 2021,2034).8-K001-11307-012/13/2012
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 31, 2013, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024 and the 5.40% Senior Notes due 2034).8-K001-11307-012/13/20126/3/2013
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 13, 2012, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022).8-K001-11307-012/13/2012

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 31, 2013, among FCX, Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 3.55% Senior Notes due 2022, the 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021, the 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024, and the 5.40% Senior Notes due 2034).8-K001-11307-016/3/2013

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed

Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 14, 2014 among FCX, Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 4.00% Senior Notes due 2021).
8-K001-11307-0111/14/2014
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 14, 2014 amongbetween FCX Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 4.55% Senior Notes due 2024).8-K001-11307-0111/14/2014


Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 14, 2014 amongbetween FCX Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 5.40% Senior Notes due 2034).
8-K001-11307-0111/14/2014
177

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed


Indenture dated as of March 7, 2013, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 3.100% Senior Notes due 2020, the 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043).8-K001-11307-013/7/2013
Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 31, 2013, amongbetween FCX Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 3.100% Senior Notes due 2020, the 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023 and the 5.450% Senior Notes due 2043).


8-K001-11307-016/3/2013
Form of Indenture dated as of September 22, 1997, between Phelps Dodge Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (relating to the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2027, the 9.50% Senior Notes due 2031 and the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034).S-3333-364159/25/1997
Form of 7.125% Debenture due November 1, 2027 of Phelps Dodge Corporation issued on November 5, 1997, pursuant to the Indenture dated as of September 22, 1997, between Phelps Dodge Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (relating to the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2027).8-K001-0008211/3/1997
Form of 9.5% Note due June 1, 2031 of Phelps Dodge Corporation issued on May 30, 2001, pursuant to the Indenture dated as of September 22, 1997, between Phelps Dodge Corporation and First Union National Bank, as successor Trustee (relating to the 9.50% Senior Notes due 2031).8-K001-000825/30/2001
Form of 6.125% Note due March 15, 2034 of Phelps Dodge Corporation issued on March 4, 2004, pursuant to the Indenture dated as of September 22, 1997, between Phelps Dodge Corporation and First Union National Bank, as successor Trustee (relating to the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034).10-K001-000823/7/2005
Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 4, 2007 to the Indenture dated as of September 22, 1997, among Phelps Dodge Corporation, as Issuer, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., as Parent Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2027, the 9.50% Senior Notes due 2031 and the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2034).10-K001-11307-012/26/2016
Form of Certificate representing shares of common stock, par value $0.10.8-A/A001-11307-018/10/2015
Indenture dated as of December 13, 2016 amongAugust 15, 2019, between FCX Freeport McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 6.875%5.00% Senior Notes due 2023)2027, the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2028, the 4.375% Senior Notes due 2028, the 5.25% Senior Notes due 2029, the 4.25% Senior Notes due 2030 and the 4.625% Senior Notes due 2030).8-K001-11307-0112/13/20168/15/2019
Registration Rights AgreementFirst Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 13, 2016 amongAugust 15, 2019, between FCX Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC,and U.S. Bank National Association, as Guarantor, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Dealer Managers, relating toTrustee (including the 6.875%form of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2023.2027).8-K001-11307-0112/13/20168/15/2019
FormSecond Supplemental Indenture dated as of Certificate representing sharesAugust 15, 2019, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of common stock, par value $0.10.5.25% Senior Notes due 2029).8-A/A8-K001-11307-018/10/201515/2019
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 4, 2020, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of 4.125% Senior Notes due 2028).8-K001-11307-013/4/2020

178

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 4, 2020, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of 4.25% Senior Notes due 2030).8-K001-11307-013/4/2020
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 31, 2020, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2028 and the 4.25% Senior Notes due 2030).10-Q001-11307-018/7/2020
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 27, 2020, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of 4.375% Senior Notes due 2028).8-K001-11307-017/27/2020
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 27, 2020, between FCX and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of 4.625% Senior Notes due 2030).8-K001-11307-017/27/2020
Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Concentrate Purchase and Sales Agreement dated effective December 11, 1996, between PT Freeport Indonesia and PT Smelting.S-3333-7276011/5/2001
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 19, 1998, Amendment No. 2 dated as of December 1, 2000, Amendment No. 3 dated as of January 1, 2003, Amendment No. 4 dated as of May 10, 2004, Amendment No. 5 dated as of March 19, 2009, Amendment No. 6 dated as of January 1, 2011, and Amendment No. 7 dated as of October 29, 2012, to the Concentrate Purchase and Sales Agreement dated effective December 11, 1996, between PT Freeport Indonesia and PT Smelting.10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
Amendment No. 8 dated as of April 16, 2014 to the Concentrate Purchase and Sales Agreement dated December 11,1996 between PT Freeport Indonesia and PT Smelting.10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
Amendment No. 9 dated as of April 10, 2017 to the Concentrate Purchase and Sales Agreement dated December 11,1996 between PT Freeport Indonesia and PT Smelting.10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
Shareholders Agreement dated as of December 21, 2018, among FCX, PT Freeport Indonesia, PT Indonesia Papua Metal Dan Mineral and PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero).X10-K001-11307-012/15/2019
PT Freeport Indonesia Special Mining License (IUPK) from the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia (English translation).X10-K001-11307-012/15/2019
Nomination and Standstill Agreement dated October 7, 2015, by and between FCX, Carl C. Icahn, High River Limited Partnership, Hopper Investments LLC, Barberry Corp., Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Offshore LP, Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Onshore LP, Icahn Capital LP, IPH GP LLC, Icahn Enterprises Holdings L.P., Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., Beckton Corp., Andrew Langham and Courtney Mather.8-K001-11307-0110/7/2015
Confidentiality Agreement dated October 7, 2015, by and between FCX, Carl C. Icahn, High River Limited Partnership, Hopper Investments LLC, Barberry Corp., Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Offshore LP, Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Onshore LP, Icahn Capital LP, IPH GP LLC, Icahn Enterprises Holdings L.P., Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., Beckton Corp., Andrew Langham and Courtney Mather.8-K001-11307-0110/7/2015
Third Amended and Restated Joint Venture and Shareholders Agreement dated as of December 11, 2003 among PT Freeport Indonesia, Mitsubishi Corporation, Nippon Mining & Metals Company, Limited and PT Smelting, as amended by the First Amendment dated as of September 30, 2005, and the Second Amendment dated as of April 30, 2008.10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
Participation Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2005, among Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, a Delaware corporation, Cyprus Metals Company, a Delaware corporation, Cyprus Climax Metals Company, a Delaware corporation, Sumitomo Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Summit Global Management, B.V., a Dutch corporation, Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation, Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anonima abierta, and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anonima abierta.8-K001-000823/22/2005

Filed
179

ExhibitFiled
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2005, among Phelps Dodge Corporation, Cyprus Climax Metals Company, a Delaware corporation, Sumitomo Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation, Summit Global Management B.V., a Dutch corporation, SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands, B.V., a Dutch corporation, Compañia de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anonima abierta, and Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., a Peruvian sociedad anonima abierta.8-K001-000826/7/2005
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 20, 2018, among FCX, PT Freeport Indonesia, Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto.8-K001-11307-04/23/2018
First Amendment dated as of May 2, 2019 to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 20, 2018, among Freeport-McMoRan Inc., PT Freeport Indonesia, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto.

8-K001-11307-015/2/2019
Second Amendment dated as of November 25, 2019 to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 20, 2018, as amended by that certain First Amendment dated as of May 2, 2019, among Freeport-McMoRan Inc., PT Freeport Indonesia, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto.8-K001-11307-0111/25/2019
Third Amendment dated as of June 3, 2020 to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 20, 2018, as amended, among FCX, PT Freeport Indonesia, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and each of the lenders and issuing banks party thereto.8-K001-11307-016/3/2020
Letter Agreement dated as of December 19, 2013, by and between FCX and Richard C. Adkerson.8-K001-11307-0112/23/2013
FCX Director Compensation.X10-K001-11307-012/26/2016
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated effective as of December 2, 2008, between FCX and Kathleen L. Quirk.10-K001-11307-012/26/2009
Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated December 2, 2008, by and between FCX and Kathleen L. Quirk, dated April 27, 2011.8-K001-11307-014/29/2011
FCX Executive Services Program.X10-K001-11307-012/24/2017
FCX Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated.8-K001-11307-012/5/2007
FCX 1996 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan.10-Q001-11307-015/12/2008
FCX 1996 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment One.10-Q001-11307-015/12/2008
FCX 1996 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment Two.10-K001-11307-012/26/2009
FCX 1996 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment Three.

10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
180

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
FCX 1996 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment Four.


10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
FCX 2005 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2015.10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
FCX 2005 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment One.10-K001-11307-012/16/2021
FCX 2005 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment Two.10-K001-11307-012/16/2021
FCX 2005 Supplemental Executive Capital Accumulation Plan Amendment Three.10-K001-11307-012/16/2021
Freeport Minerals Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated.X10-K001-11307-012/15/2019
FCX Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.10-Q001-11307-015/10/2007
FCX 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.10-Q001-11307-015/10/2007
FCX 2004 Director Compensation Plan, as amended and restated.10-Q001-11307-018/6/2010
FCX Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.10-K001-11307-012/27/2014
FCX 2016 Stock Incentive Plan.8-K001-11307-016/9/2016
Form of Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (for grants made to non-management directors and advisory directors).8-K001-11307-016/14/2010
Form of Nonqualified Stock Options Grant Agreement under the FCX stock incentive plans (effective February 2014).10-K001-11307-012/27/2014
FCX Annual Incentive Plan (For Fiscal Years Ending 2014 - 2018).8-K001-11307-016/18/2014
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units (for grants made to non-management directors).

10-K001-11307-012/24/2017
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (effective February 2018).10-K001-11307-0110-K001-11307-012/24/201720/2018

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (effective February 2015).10-K001-11307-012/27/2015
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (effective March 2016).10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (effective February 2018)2021).X10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
Form of Nonqualified Stock Options Grant Agreement (effective February 2018).10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (effective February 2018).10-K001-11307-012/20/2018
FCX Annual Incentive Plan (effective January 2019).X10-K001-11307-012/15/2019
FCX Executive Change in Control Severance Plan.X
FCX Principles of Business Conduct.10-K001-11307-012/24/201714/2020
List of Subsidiaries of FCX.X
List of Subsidiary Guarantors and Subsidiary Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.X
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.X
Consents of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Cerro Verde Mine.X
Consents of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Grasberg Minerals District.X
Consents of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Morenci Mine.X
181

Filed
Exhibitwith thisIncorporated by Reference
NumberExhibit TitleForm 10-KFormFile No.Date Filed
Certified resolution of the Board of Directors of FCX authorizing this report to be signed on behalf of any officer or director pursuant to a Power of Attorney.X
Powers of Attorney pursuant to which this report has been signed on behalf of certain officers and directors of FCX.X
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d - 14(a).X
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d - 14(a).X
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.X
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350.X
Mine Safety Disclosure.X
101.INS
Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Cerro Verde Mine, effective as of December 31, 2021.X
Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Grasberg Minerals District, effective as of December 31, 2021.X
Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Morenci Mine, effective as of December 31, 2021.X
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.Document - the XBRL Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.X
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.X
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.X
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.X
101.LAB
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.X
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.X
104The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.X
Note:  Certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of FCX have not been filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K since the total amount of securities authorized under any such instrument does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of FCX and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. FCX agrees to furnish a copy of each such instrument upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Commission (SEC).


*  Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit upon the request of the SEC in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K.




Item 16.  Form 10-K Summary.


Not applicable.

182

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Following is a glossary of selected terms used throughout the FCXthis Annual Report on Form 10-K that are technical in nature:
Mining
Adits. A horizontal passage leading into a mine for the purposes of access or drainage.
Alluvial aquifers. A water-bearing deposit of loosely arranged gravel, sand or silt left behind by a river or other flowing water.
Anode. A positively charged metal sheet, usually lead, on which oxidation occurs. During the electro-refining process, anodes are impure copper sheets from the smelting process that require further processing to produce refined copper cathode.
Azurite. A bluish supergene copper mineral and ore found in the oxidized portions of copper deposits often associated with malachite.
Bench. The horizontal floor cuttings along which mining progresses in an open-pit mine. As the pit progresses to lower levels, safety benches are left in the walls to catch any falling rock.
Blasthole stoping. An underground mining method that extracts the ore zone in large vertical rooms. The ore is broken by blasting using large-diameter vertical drill holes.
Block cave. A general term used to describe an underground mining method where the extraction of ore depends largely on the action of gravity. By continuously removing a thin horizontal layer at the bottom mining level of the ore column, the vertical support of the ore column is removed and the ore then caves by gravity.
Bornite. A red-brown isometric mineral comprising copper, iron and sulfur.
British thermal unit or Btu. One British thermal unit is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Brochantite. A greenish-black copper mineral occurring in the oxidation zone of copper sulfide deposits.
Cathode. Refined copper produced by electro-refining of impure copper or by electrowinning.
Chalcocite. A grayish copper sulfide mineral, usually found as a supergene in copper deposits formed from the re-deposition of copper minerals that were solubilized from the oxide portion of the deposit.
Chalcopyrite. A brass-yellow sulfide of mineral copper and iron.
Chrysocolla. A bluish-green to emerald-green oxide copper mineral that forms incrustations and thin seams in oxidized parts of copper-mineral veins; a source of copper and an ornamental stone.
Cobalt. A tough, lustrous, nickel-white or silvery-gray metallic element often associated with nickel and copper ores from which it is obtained as a by-product.
Concentrate. The resulting product from the concentrating process that is composed predominantly of copper sulfide or molybdenum sulfide minerals. Further processing might include smelting and electro-refining, or roasting.
Concentrating. The process by which ore is separated into metal concentrate through crushing, milling and flotation.
Concentrator. A process plant used to separate targeted minerals from gangue and produce a mineral concentrate that can be marketed or processed by additional downstream processes to produce salable metals or mineral products. Term is used interchangeably with Mill.
Contained copper.metal. The percentageamount of coppermetal in a mineral sample before the reduction of amounts unable to be recovered during the metallurgical process.
Covellite. A metallic, indigo-blue supergene mineral found in copper deposits.
Crushed-ore leach pad. A slightly sloping pad upon which leach ores are placed in lifts for processing.

S-183

Cutoff grade. The minimum percentage of coppergrade contained in the ore for processing. When percentages are below this grade, the material would be routed to a high-liftan overburden stockpile or waste stockpile.left unmined. When percentages are above grade, the material would be processed using concentrating or leaching methods for higher recovery.methods.
Disseminations. A mineral deposit in which the desired minerals occur as scattered particles in the rock that has sufficient quantity to be considered an ore deposit.
Electrolytic refining. The purification of metals by electrolysis. A large piece of impure copper is used as the anode with a thin strip of pure copper as the cathode.
Electrowinning. A process that uses electricity to plate copper contained in an electrolyte solution into copper cathode.
Flotation. A concentrating process in which valuable minerals attach themselves to bubbles of an oily froth for separation as concentrate. The gangue material from the flotation process reports as a tailing product.
Grade. The relative quality or percentage of metal content.
Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples are distinct social and cultural groups that share collective ancestral ties to the lands and natural resources where they live, occupy or from which they have been displaced.
Leach stockpiles. A quantity of leachable ore placed on a leach pad or in another suitable location that permits leaching and collection of solutions that contain solubilized metal.
Leaching. The process of extracting copper using a chemical solution to dissolve copper contained in ore.
Malachite. A bright-green copper mineral (ore) that often occurs with azurite in oxidized zones of copper deposits.
Metric ton. The equivalent of 2,204.62 pounds.
Mill stockpile. Millable ore that has been mined, and is available for future processing.
Mine-for-leach. A mining operation focused on mining only leachable ores. Also, referred to as crushed leach.
Mineralization. The process by which a mineral is introduced into a rock, resulting in concentration of minerals that may form a valuable or potentially valuable deposit.
Molybdenite. A black, platy, disulfide of molybdenum. It is the most common ore of molybdenum.
Ore body. A continuous, well-defined mass of mineralized material of sufficient ore content to make extraction economically feasible.
Oxide. In mining, oxide is used as an ore classification relating to material that usually leaches well but does not perform well in a concentrator. Oxide minerals in mining refer to an oxidized form.
Paste backfill. A slurry of paste material produced from tailings with engineered cement and water content that is used to fill underground mined out stopes.
Porphyry. A deposit in which minerals of copper, molybdenum, gold or, less commonly, tungsten and tin are disseminated or occur in stock-work of small veinlets within a large mass of hydro-thermally altered igneous rock. The host rock is commonly an intrusive porphyry, but other rocks intruded by a porphyry can also be hosts for ore minerals.
Production level. With respect to underground mining, the elevation of the underground works that permit extraction/transport of the ore to a common point, shaft or plant.
Pseudomalachite. A dark-green monoclinic copper mineral.
Roasting. The heating of sulfide ores to oxidize sulfides to facilitate further processing.
Run-of-Mine (ROM). Leachable ore that is mined and directly placed on a leach pad without utilizing any further processes to reduce particle size prior to leaching.
S-184

Skarn. A Swedish mining term for silicate gangue of certain iron ore and sulfide deposits of Archaean age, particularly those that have replaced limestone and dolomite. Its meaning has been generally expanded to include

lime-bearing silicates, of any geologic age, derived from nearly pure limestone and dolomite with the introduction of large amounts of silicon, aluminum, iron and magnesium.
Smelting. The process of melting and oxidizing concentrate to separate copper and precious metals from metallic and non-metallic impurities, including iron, silica, alumina and sulfur.
Solution extraction. A process that transfers copper from a copper-bearing ore to an organic solution, then to an electrolyte. The electrolyte is then pumped to a tankhouse where the copper is extracted, using electricity, into a copper cathode (refer to the term Electrowinning), together referred to as solution extraction/electrowinning (SX/EW).
Spot price. The current price at which a commodity can be bought or sold at a specified time and place.
Stope. An underground mining method that is usually applied to highly inclined or vertical veins. Ore is extracted by driving horizontally upon it in a series of workings, one immediately over the other. Each horizontal working is called a stope because when a number of them are in progress, each working face under attack assumes the shape of a flight of stairs.
Sulfide. A mineral compound containing sulfur and a metal. Copper sulfides can be concentrated or leached, depending on the mineral type.
Tailing. Tailings. The crushed and ground material remaining after economically recoverable metals and minerals have been extracted. In upstream design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment, with subsequent crest raises progressively shifting upstream of each previous raise, using deposited tailings as a foundation. In downstream design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment. Borrow fill or a portion of the tailings are placed on the downstream side of the starter embankment. Subsequent crest raises progressively shift downstream of each previous raise, such that the previous raise becomes the foundation of the subsequent raise. As a result, the toe and the crest of the embankment progressively shift downstream as the embankment is raised. In centerline design and construction, tailings are deposited on the upstream side of the starter embankment. Borrow fill or a portion of the tailings are placed on the crest of the starter embankment. Subsequent crest raises are constructed vertically along the centerline of the previous raise such that the previous raise becomes the foundation of the subsequent raise. As a result, the toe of the embankment shifts downstream but the crest stays along initial alignment as the embankment is raised.
Tolling. The process of converting customer-owned material into specified products, which is then returned to the customer.
Oil and Gas
Barrel or Bbl. One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume (used in reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons).
Blowouts. Accidents resulting from loss of hydraulic well control while conducting drilling operations.
Barrel of Oil Equivalent or BOE. One stock tank barrel equivalent of oil, calculated by converting gas volumes to equivalent oil barrels at a ratio of 6 thousand cubic feet to 1 barrel of oil.
British thermal unit or Btu. One British thermal unit is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Condensate. A mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and temperature.
Cratering. The collapse of the circulation system dug around the drilling rig for the prevention of blowouts.
Developed oil and gas reserves. Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered: (i) through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and (ii) through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.
Development well. A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Differential. An adjustment to the price of oil or natural gas from an established spot market price to reflect differences in the quality and/or location of oil or gas.
Natural gas liquids or NGLs. Hydrocarbons (primarily ethane, propane, butane and natural gasolines) which have been extracted from wet natural gas and become liquid under various combinations of increasing pressure and lower temperature.
Standardized measure. The present value, discounted at 10 percent per year, of estimated future net revenues from the production of proved reserves, computed by applying sales prices used in estimating proved oil and natural gas reserves to the year-end quantities of those reserves in effect as of the dates of such estimates and held constant

throughout the productive life of the reserves (except for consideration of future price changes to the extent provided by contractual arrangements in existence at year-end), and deducting the estimated future costs to be incurred in developing, producing and abandoning the proved reserves (computed based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions). Future income taxes are calculated by applying the appropriate year-end statutory federal and state income tax rates, with consideration of future tax rates already legislated, to pre-tax future net cash flows, net of the tax basis of the properties involved and utilization of available tax carryforwards related to proved oil and natural gas reserves.
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas regardless of whether the acreage contains proved reserves.
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves. Undeveloped oil and natural gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time. Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.
Working interest. An interest in an oil and gas lease that gives the owner of the interest the right to drill for and produce oil and gas on the leased acreage and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production operations.
For additional information regarding the definitions contained in this Glossary, or for other oil and gas definitions, refer to Rule 4-10
S-185


SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 15, 2019.2022.


Freeport-McMoRan Inc.




By:/s/ Richard C. Adkerson
Richard C. Adkerson
Vice Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated on February 15, 2019.
2022.
/s/ Richard C. AdkersonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Richard C. Adkerson(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Richard C. AdkersonVice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Richard C. Adkerson(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Kathleen L. QuirkExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kathleen L. Quirk(Principal Financial Officer)
*Vice President and Controller - Financial Reporting
C. Donald Whitmire, Jr.(Principal Accounting Officer)
*Chairman of the BoardDirector
Gerald J. FordDavid P. Abney
*Director
Marcela E. Donadio
*Director
Robert W. Dudley
*Director
Hugh Grant
*Director
Lydia H. Kennard
*Director
Courtney MatherRyan M. Lance
*Director
Sara Grootwassink Lewis
*Director
Dustan E. McCoy
*Director
John J. Stephens
*Director
Frances Fragos Townsend
* By:         /s/ Richard C. Adkerson           
Richard C. Adkerson
Attorney-in-Fact

S - 1S-1