Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018
OR
¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission File Number: 0-18415

Isabella Bank Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Michigan 38-2830092
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
identification No.)
401 North Main Street, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (989) 772-9471
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock - No Par Value
(Title of Class)
Indicated by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    ¨  Yes    x  No
Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     ¨  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One).
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x
     
Non-accelerated filer 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    ýx  No
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $185,183,000$211,421,000 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The number of common shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock (no par value) was 7,804,2877,873,337 as of March 7, 2016.11, 2019.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(Such documents are incorporated herein only to the extent specifically set forth in response to an item herein.)
Portions of the Isabella Bank Corporation Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 7, 2019 are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K in response to Part III. The Isabella Bank Corporation Proxy Statement will be mailed on or before March 25, 2019.
DocumentsPart of Form 10-K Incorporated into
Portions of the Isabella Bank Corporation Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 3, 2016Part III


1

Table of Contents

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
PART I   
     
Item 1.  
     
Item 1A.  
     
Item 1B.  
     
Item 2.  
     
Item 3.  
     
Item 4.  
     
PART II   
     
Item 5.  
     
Item 6.  
     
Item 7.  
     
Item 7A.  
     
Item 8.  
     
Item 9.  
     
Item 9A.  
     
Item 9B.  
     
PART III   
     
Item 10.  
     
Item 11.  
     
Item 12.  
     
Item 13.  
     
Item 14.  
     
PART IV   
     
Item 15.  
Item 16.
     
SIGNATURES   


2

Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.amended and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder. We intend such forward looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are included in this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: interest rates, general economic conditions, federal or state tax laws, monetary and fiscal policy, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios,portfolio, demand for loan products, fluctuation in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio, deposit flows, competition, cybersecurity risk, demand for financial services in our market area, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our consolidated financial results, is included in our filings with the SEC.
Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations
The acronyms and abbreviations identified below may be used throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in our other SEC filings. You may find it helpful to refer back to this page while reading this report.
AFS: Available-for-saleACL: Allowance for Credit Losses GAAP: U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
AFS: Available-for-saleGLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
ALLL: Allowance for loan and lease losses GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards
AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) IFRS: International Financial Reporting StandardsIRR: Interest rate risk
ASC: FASB Accounting Standards Codification IRR: Interest rate riskISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association
ASU: FASB Accounting Standards Update JOBS Act: Jumpstart our Business Startups Act
ATM: Automated Teller Machine LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
BHC Act: Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 N/A: Not applicable
CFPB: Consumer Financial Protection BureauCECL: Current Expected Credit Losses N/M: Not meaningful
CIK: Central Index KeyCFPB: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau NASDAQ: NASDAQ Stock Market Index
CRA: Community Reinvestment ActCIK: Central Index Key NASDAQ Banks: NASDAQ Bank Stock Index
CRA: Community Reinvestment ActNAV: Net asset value
DIF: Deposit Insurance Fund NAV: Net asset valueNOW: Negotiable order of withdrawal
DIFS: Department of Insurance and Financial Services NOW: Negotiable order of withdrawalNSF: Non-sufficient funds
Directors Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors NSF: Non-sufficient fundsOCI: Other comprehensive income (loss)
Dividend Reinvestment Plan: Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan OCI: Other comprehensive income (loss)OMSR: Originated mortgage servicing rights
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 OMSR: Originated mortgage servicing rights
ESOP: Employee stock ownership planOREO: Other real estate owned
ESOP: Employee Stock Ownership PlanOTTI: Other-than-temporary impairment
Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934 OTTI: Other-than-temporary impairmentPBO: Projected benefit obligation
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board PBO: Projected benefit obligationPCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
FDI Act: Federal Deposit Insurance Act PCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardRabbi Trust: A trust established to fund our Directors Plan
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Rabbi Trust: A trust established to fund the Directors PlanSEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council SEC: U.S. Securities & Exchange CommissionSOX: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
FRB: Federal Reserve Bank SOX: Sarbanes-OxleyTax Act: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, of 2002enacted December 22, 2017
FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank TDR: Troubled debt restructuring
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation XBRL: eXtensible Business Reporting Language
FTE: Fully taxable equivalent Yield Curve: U.S. Treasury Yield Curve


3

Table of Contents

Restatement of Previously Filed Reports (Dollars in thousands)
Overview of Restatement
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, certain prior period financial information has been restated due to an accounting correction. Impacted sections of this report include:
1.Selected Financial Data in Item 6 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011;
2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Item 7 as it relates to the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011 and interim periods ended September 30, 2015, June 30, 2015, and March 31, 2015;
3.Financial Statements in Item 8:
a.Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014, Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013; and
b.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Background of Restatement
The necessary restatement was identified by management in the fourth quarter of 2015 during the course of our preparation of the consolidated financial statements and evaluation of financial results as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The restatements relate to the accounting for deferred costs associated with originating loans (under ASC 310-20) and the proper classification of the net deferred costs recorded in gross loans within the consolidated balance sheets and as a deferral of compensation expenses within the consolidated statements of income. Prior to December 31, 2015, loan origination cost deferrals (under ASC 310-20) were reported in loan interest and fee income instead of as a reduction of compensation and benefits, which is included in other noninterest expenses. Additionally, net deferred asset balances (under ASC 310-20) prior to December 31, 2015 were reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets instead of reported in gross loans. Amortization of the net deferred asset balance was recognized appropriately in loan interest and fee income.
Impact of Restatement
The overall impact of the restatement on our consolidated financial position and results of operations is not believed to be material and as such, previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement have not been amended. The determination of materiality was, in part, concluded based on the following observations:
No impact to net income for any prior periods;
No impact to earnings per share, other stock data, or dividend data for any prior periods;
No impact on total assets for any prior periods; and
No impact on retained earnings or total equity for any prior periods.
The impact to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 was a $2,968 increase in gross loans and a $2,968 decline in other assets. There were no other changes to the consolidated balance sheets for any prior periods.

4

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the effects of the restatement on items within the Consolidated Statements of Income. Since the restatement did not impact net income, pre-tax and adjustments net of tax are not included.
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Previously Reported Restated Previously Reported Restated
Interest income       
Loans, including fees$39,432
 $36,629
 $41,233
 $37,575
All other interest income14,519
 14,519
 12,843
 12,843
Total interest income53,951
 51,148
 54,076
 50,418
Total interest expense9,970
 9,970
 11,021
 11,021
Net interest income43,981
 41,178
 43,055
 39,397
Provision for loan losses(668) (668) 1,111
 1,111
Net interest income after provision for loan losses44,649
 41,846
 41,944
 38,286
Total noninterest income9,325
 9,325
 10,175
 10,175
Noninterest expenses       
Compensation and benefits21,305
 18,502
 21,465
 17,807
All other noninterest expenses16,601
 16,601
 15,948
 15,948
Total noninterest expenses37,906
 35,103
 37,413
 33,755
Federal income tax expense2,344
 2,344
 2,196
 2,196
Net income$13,724
 $13,724
 $12,510
 $12,510
As demonstrated above, loan interest and fee income and compensation and benefits were reduced by $2,803 and $3,658 during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
All amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K affected by the restatement adjustments reflect such amounts as restated.

5

Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1. Business. (Dollars in thousands)
General
Isabella Bank Corporation is a registered financial services holding company that was incorporated in September 1988 under Michigan law. The Corporation's solewholly owned subsidiary, Isabella Bank, has 2930 banking offices located throughout Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties. The area includes significant agricultural production, manufacturing, retail, gaming and tourism, and fiveseveral colleges and universities.
As used in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, references to "the Corporation," “Isabella,” “we,” “our,” “us,”“the Corporation”, “Isabella”, “we”, “our”, “us”, and similar terms refer to the consolidated entity consisting of Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiary. Isabella Bank Corporation refers solelyReferences to the parent holding company, and Isabella Bank or the “Bank” referrefers to Isabella Bank Corporation’s subsidiary, Isabella Bank.
Our reportable segments are based on legal entities that account for at least 10% of net operating results. Retail banking operations for 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 20132016 represent approximately 90% or greater of total assets and operating results. As such, we have only one reportable segment.
We are a community bank with a focus on providing high quality, personalized service at a fair price. We offer a broad array of banking services to businesses, institutions, individuals and individuals.their families. We compete with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage brokers, finance companies, credit unions, and retail brokerage firms.firms, and other companies providing financial services.
Lending activities include loans for commercial and agricultural operating and real estate purposes, residential real estate loans, and consumer loans. We limit lending activities primarily to local markets and have not purchased any loans from the secondary market. We do not make loans to fund leveraged buyouts, have no foreign corporate or government loans, and have limited holdings of corporate debt securities. Our general lending philosophy is to limit concentrations to individuals and business segments. For additional information related to our lending strategies and policies, see “Note 5Note 4Loans and ALLL” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Deposit services offered include checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, direct deposits, cash management services, mobile and internet banking, electronic bill pay services, and automated teller machines. We also offer full service trustinvestment management and brokeragetrust services.
As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had 374371 full-time equivalent employees. We provide group life, health, accident, disability, and other insurance programs as well as a number of other employee benefit programs. None of our workforce is subject to collective bargaining agreements.
Available Information
Our SEC filings (including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Definitive Proxy Statements, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports) are available through our website (www.isabellabank.com). We will provide paper copies of our SEC reports free of charge upon request ofby a shareholder.
The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Isabella Bank Corporation (CIK #0000842517) and other issuers.
Supervision and Regulation
The earnings and growth of the banking industry and, therefore, our earnings are affected by the credit policies of monetary authorities, including the FRB. An important function of the FRB is to regulate the national supply of bank credit in order to combat recessions and curbrespond to inflationary pressures. Among the instruments of monetary policy used by the FRB to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government Agency securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These methods are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth of bank loans, investments and deposits and also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the FRB have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks and related financial service providers in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effect of such policies upon our future business and earnings cannot be predicted.
We, as a financial holding company, are regulated under the BHC Act, and are subject to the supervision of the FRB. We are registered as a financial services holding company with the FRB and are subject to annual reporting requirements and

6

Table of Contents

inspections and

audits. Under FRB policy, we are expected to act as a source of financial strength to the Bank and to commit resources to support its subsidiaries. This support may be required at times when, in the absence of such FRB policy, it would not otherwise be required to provide support.
Under Michigan law, if the capital of a Michigan state chartered bank has become impaired by losses or otherwise, the Commissioner of the DIFS may require that the deficiency in capital be met by assessment upon the bank’s shareholdersshareholders. Each shareholder would be responsible for a pro rata share of the deficiency, based on the amount of capital stock held by each and if any suchshareholder. If an assessment is not paid by any shareholder within 30 days of the date of mailing of notice thereof to suchthe shareholder, cause the sale of thetheir stock of such shareholderwill occur in order to pay such assessment and the costs of sale of such stock.assessment.
Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment. This priority would apply to guarantees of capital plans under the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991.
SOX contains important requirements for public companies in the area of financial disclosure and corporate governance. In accordance with Section 302(a) of SOX, written certifications by our principal executive, financial, and accounting officers are required. These certifications attest that our quarterly and annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact (see the certifications filed as Exhibits 31 (a) and (b) to this Form 10-K for such certification of consolidated financial statements and other information for this 20152018 Form 10-K). We have also implemented a program designed to comply with Section 404 of SOX, which included the identification of significant processes and accounts, documentation of the design of control effectiveness over process and entity level controls, and testing of the operating effectiveness of key controls. See Item 9A. Controls and Procedures for our evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Certain additional information concerning regulatory guidelines for capital adequacy and other regulatory matters is presented herein under the caption “Capital” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in “Note 159Off-Balance-Sheet Activities, Commitments and Other Matters”Matters and “Note 1610Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements”Requirements of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Isabella Bank
The Bank is supervised and regulated by DIFS and the FRB. TheThese agencies and federal and state laws extensively regulate various aspects of the banking business including, among other things, permissible types and amounts of loans, investments and other activities, capital adequacy, branching, interest rates on loans and deposits, and the safety and soundness of banking practices.
Our deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the DIF of the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that assesses insurance premiums based upon a risk matrixfinancial ratios method that takes into account assetsasset and capital levels and supervisory ratings.
Banking laws and regulations restrict transactions by insured banks owned by a bank holding company, includingcompany. These restrictions include loans to and certain purchases from the parent holding company, non-bank and bank subsidiaries of the parent holding company,company. Additional restrictions apply to principal shareholders, officers, directors and their affiliates, and investments by the subsidiary bank in the shares or securities of the parent holding company (or any of the other non-bank or bank affiliates), or acceptance of such shares or securities as collateral security for loans to any borrower.
The Bank is subject to legal limitations on the frequency and amount of dividends that can be paid to Isabella Bank Corporation. For example, a Michigan state chartered bank may not declare a cash dividend or a dividend in kind except out of net profits then on hand after deducting all losses and bad debts, and then only if it will have a surplus amounting to not less than 20% of its capital after the payment of the dividend. Moreover, a Michigan state chartered bank may not declare or pay any cash dividend or dividend in kind until the cumulative dividends on its preferred stock, if any, have been paid in full. Further, if the surplus of a Michigan state chartered bank is at any time less than the amount of its capital, before the declaration of a cash dividend or dividend in kind, it must transfer to surplus not less than 10% of its net profits for the preceding six months (in the case of quarterly or semi-annual dividends) or the preceding two consecutive six month periods (in the case of annual dividends).
The payment of dividends by Isabella Bank Corporation and the Bank is also affected by various regulatory requirements and policies, such as the requirement to keep adequate capital in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Federal laws impose

further restrictions on the payment of dividends by insured banks that fail to meet specified capital levels. The FDIC may

7

Table of Contents

prevent an insured bank from paying dividends if the bank is in default of payment of any assessment due to the FDIC. In addition, payment of dividends by a bank may be prevented by the applicable federal regulatory authority if such payment is determined, by reason of the financial condition of such bank, to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The FRB and the FDIC have issued policy statements providing that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. Additionally, the FRB Board of Governors requires a bank holding company to notify the FRB prior to increasing its cash dividend by more than 10% over the prior year.
The aforementioned regulations and restrictions may limit our ability to obtain funds from the Bank for our cash needs, including payment of dividends and operating expenses.
The activities and operations of the Bank are also subject to various federal and state laws and regulations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to various risks. These risks, if not managed correctly, could have a significant impact on our earnings, capital, share price, and ability to pay dividends. In order to effectively monitor and control the following risks, we utilize an enterprise risk model. We balance our strategic goals, including revenue and profitability objectives, with associated risks through the use of policies, systems, and procedures which have been adopted to identify, assess, control, monitor, and manage each risk area. We continually review the adequacy and effectiveness of these policies, systems, and procedures.
Our enterprise risk process covers each of the following areas.
Changes in credit quality and required allowance for loan and lease losses
To manage the credit risk arising from lending activities, our most significant source of credit risk, we maintain what we believe are sound underwriting policies and procedures. We continuously monitor asset quality in order to manage our credit risk to determine the appropriateness of valuation allowances. These valuation allowances take into consideration various factors including, but not limited to, local, regional, and national economic conditions.
We maintain an ALLL to reserve for estimated incurred loan losses and risks within our loan portfolio. The level of the ALLL reflects our evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; loan portfolio quality; and economic, political and regulatory conditions. The determination of the appropriate level of the ALLL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates, all of which may undergo material changes.
Changes in economic conditions
An economic downturn within our local markets, as well as downturns in the state, national, or nationalglobal markets, could negatively impact household and corporate incomes. This could lead to decreased demand for both loan and deposit products and lead to an increase of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans. We continually monitor key economic indicators in an effort to anticipate the possible effects of downturns in the local, regional, and national economies.
Our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions of the State of Michigan and the specific local markets in which we operate. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to customers located primarily in the Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for our products and services, as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans, and the stability of our deposit funding sources. A significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rate risk
IRR results from the timing differences in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution’s interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities. We monitor the potential effects of changes in interest rates through simulations and gap analyses. To help mitigate the effects of changes in interest rates, we make significant efforts to stagger projected cash flows and maturities of interest sensitive assets and liabilities.

8


Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from our inability to meet our obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable costs. Liquidity risk includes the inability to manage unplanned decreases or changes in funding sources, or failure to recognize or address changes in market conditions that affect the ability to liquidate assets quickly and with minimal loss in value. We have significant borrowing capacity through correspondent banks and the ability to sell certain investments to fund potential cash shortages, which we may use to help mitigate this risk.
The value of investment securities may be negatively impacted by fluctuations in the market
A volatile, illiquid market or decline in credit quality could require us to recognize an OTTI loss related to the investment securities held in our portfolio. We consider many factors in determining whether an OTTI exists including the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than cost, the investment credit rating, and the probability that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due. The presence of these factors could lead to impairment charges. These risks are mitigated by the fact that we assert that we do not intend to sell the security in an unrealized loss position and it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis.
Operational risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or external events and includes reputation risk and transaction risk. Reputation risk is managed by developing and retaining marketplace confidence in handling customers’ financial transactions in an appropriate manner and protecting our safety and soundness. Transaction risk includes losses from fraud, error, the inability to deliver products or services, and loss or theft of information. Transaction risk also encompasses product development and delivery, transaction processing, information technology systems, and the internal control environment.
To minimize the potential losses due to operational risks, we have established a robust system of internal controls that is regularly tested by our internal audit department in conjunction with the services of certified public accounting firms who assistsassist in performing such internal audit work. The focus of these internal audit procedures is to verify the validity and appropriateness of various transactions, processes, and controls. The results of these procedures are reported to our Audit Committee.
The adoption of, violations of, or nonconformance with laws, rules, regulations, or prescribed practices
The financial services industry and public companies are extensively regulated and must meet regulatory standards set by the FDIC, DIFS, FRB, FASB, SEC, PCAOB, the CFPB, and other regulatory bodies. Federal and state laws and regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, and not necessarily to benefit our shareholders. The nature, extent, and timing of the adoption of significant new laws, changes in existing laws, or repeal of existing laws may have a material impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, the effect of which is impossible to predict at this time.
Our compliance department annually assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of our processes for controlling and managing our principal compliance risks.
Changes to the financial services industry as a result of regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation
The financial services industry is extensively regulated by state and federal regulation that governs almost all aspects of our operations. Laws and regulations may change from time-to-time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors, and the deposit insurance fund. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact us or our ability to increase the value of our business. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution, and the appropriateness of an institution’s ALLL. Future regulatory changes or accounting pronouncements may increase our regulatory capital requirements or adversely affect our regulatory capital levels. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against us could require the dedication of significant time and resources to defend our business and may lead to penalties.
We may not adjust to changes in the financial services industry
Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to maintain and grow our core deposit customer base and expand our financial services to our existing and new customers. The increasingly competitive environment is, in part, a result of changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. New competitors may emerge to increase the degree of competition for our products and services. Financial services and products are also constantly changing. Our financial performance is also dependent upon customer demand for our products and services, and

our ability to develop and offer competitive financial products and services.services, and our ability to adapt to enhancements in financial technology.
We may be required to recognize an impairment of goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the amounts paid to acquire subsidiaries over the fair value of their net assets at the date of acquisition. The majority of the recorded goodwill is related to acquisitions of other banks, which were subsequently merged into Isabella Bank. If it is determined that the goodwill has beenis impaired, we must write-down the goodwill by the amount of the impairment.

9


We may face pressure from purchasers of our residential mortgage loans to repurchase loans sold or reimburse purchasers for losses related to such loans
We generally sell the fixed rate long termlong-term residential mortgage loans we originate to the secondary market. In response to the recent economic downturn, theThe purchasers of residential mortgage loans, such as government sponsored entities, increased their efforts to require sellers of residential mortgage loans to either repurchase loans previously sold, or reimburse the purchasers for losses incurred on foreclosed loans due to actual or alleged failure to strictly conform to the terms of the contract.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions
Technology and other changes are allowing customers to complete financial transactions without the involvement of banks. For example, consumers can now pay bills and transfer funds directly without banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries in financial transactions could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and income generated from those deposits.
Changes to the financial services industry as a result of regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation
The financial services industry is extensively regulated by state and federal regulation that governs almost all aspects of our operations. Laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors, and the deposit insurance fund. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact us or our ability to increase the value of our business. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution and the appropriateness of an institution’s ALLL. Future regulatory changes or accounting pronouncements may increase our regulatory capital requirements or adversely affect our regulatory capital levels. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against us could require the dedication of significant time and resources to defending our business and may lead to penalties.
Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information, whether through cyber attacks, breach of computer systems or otherwiseother means
As partOur products, services and systems are accessed through critical company or third-party operations. This involves the storage, processing and transmission of our business, we collectsensitive data, including proprietary or confidential data, regulated data, and retain sensitivepersonal information of employees and confidential client andcustomers. Successful breaches, employee wrongdoing, or human or technological error could result in unauthorized access to, disclosure, modification, misuse, loss, or destruction of company, customer, information on our behalf and on behalf ofor other third parties. Despite the security measuresparty data or systems. Examples include theft of sensitive, regulated, or confidential data including personal information; loss of access to critical data or systems through ransomware, destructive attacks or other means; and business delays, service or system disruptions or denials of service.
Cybersecurity incidents have increased in number and severity and it is expected that these trends will continue. Should we, have in place for our facilities and systems, and the security measures of ouror third party service providers,parties we may be vulnerabledo business with, fall victim to successful cyber attacks security breaches, actsor experience other cybersecurity incidents, including the loss of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, human errorspersonally identifiable customer or other similar events. Risks related to cybersecurity continue to evolve withinsensitive data, the industry. We continually review and monitor information and data related to cybersecurity to detect and mitigate attacks. A cyber attack could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information, whether by us or by our vendors,result could severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and increase cybersecurity or other insurance premiums.
We have cybersecurity insurance, in the event a cybersecurity attack were to occur, covering expenses related to notification, credit monitoring, investigation, crisis management, public relations, and legal advice. In addition, we maintain insurance to cover restoration of data, certain physical damage or third-party injuries caused by potential cybersecurity incidents. However, damage and claims arising from such incidents may not be covered or may exceed the amount of any insurance available. Insurance policies are reviewed annually in detail.
A strong reputation is vital and requires utmost protection. An operating incident, significant cybersecurity disruption, or other adverse event may have a material adverse effectnegative impact on our business.reputation which could make it more difficult for us to compete successfully for new opportunities, obtain necessary regulatory approvals, or severely reduce consumer demand for our products.
Our estimates and assumptions may be incorrect
Our consolidated financial statements conform with GAAP, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. These estimatesEstimates are based on information available to us at the time the estimates are made. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For further discussion regarding significant accounting estimates, see “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes“Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Disruption of infrastructure
Our operations depend upon our technological and physical infrastructure, including our equipment and facilities. Extended disruption of our vital infrastructure by fire, power loss, natural disaster, telecommunications failure, computer hacking and viruses, or other events outside of our control, could have a significant impact on our operations. We have developed and tested disaster recovery plans which provide detailed instructions coveringfor all significant aspects of our operations.
Anti-takeover provisions
Our articles of incorporation include anti-takeover provisions that require a two-thirds majority vote to approve a sale of the Corporation. Additionally, changes to our articles of incorporation must be approved by a two-thirds majority vote of our shareholders. These provisions may make our stock less attractive to potential shareholders.

10


Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our executive offices are located at 401 North Main Street in Mount Pleasant, Michigan. In addition to this location, we own 29 branches, antwo operations center, a mortgage operations center, and acenters, our previous main office building.building and vacant land. We also lease property in Saginaw, Michigan which serves as a full-service branch. Our facilitiesfacilities' current, planned, and best use is for conducting our current activities, with the exception of approximately 75% of our previous main office location and approximately 25% of the building that houses our mortgage processing operations which are leased to non-related parties.is vacant. We continually monitor and assess the need for expansion and/or improvement forof all facilities. In our opinion, each facility has sufficient capacity and is in good condition.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are not involved in any material legal proceedings. We are involved in ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business; however, no such routine proceedings are expected to result in any material adverse effect on our consolidated operations, earnings, financial condition, or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

11


PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Common Stock and Dividend Information
Our authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,799,8677,870,969 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015.2018. As of that date, there were 3,0443,083 shareholders of record.
Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market.  Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX market tier of the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s ("OTC Markets") electronic quotation system (www.otcmarkets.com) under the symbol “ISBA”.  Other trades in our common stock occur in privately negotiated transactions from time-to-timetime to time of which we may have little or no information.
We have reviewed the information available as to the range of reported high and low bid quotations, including high and low bid information as reported by OTC Markets. The following table sets forth our compilation of that information for the periods indicated. Price information obtained from OTC Markets reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down,mark up, mark down, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The following compiled data is provided for information purposes only and should not be viewed as indicative of the actual or market value of our common stock.

Number of
Common Shares
 Sale PriceNumber of
Common Shares
 Sale Price
Low HighLow High
2015     
2018     
First Quarter81,754
 $22.00
 $23.50
65,782
 $26.11
 $28.25
Second Quarter94,019
 22.70
 23.80
78,922
 26.25
 27.25
Third Quarter143,183
 22.75
 23.85
86,032
 26.05
 27.65
Fourth Quarter109,276
 23.50
 29.90
73,364
 22.50
 27.00
428,232
    304,100
    
2014     
2017     
First Quarter79,719
 $22.25
 $23.94
96,592
 $27.60
 $29.00
Second Quarter72,142
 22.44
 23.50
64,160
 27.60
 28.45
Third Quarter94,422
 21.73
 24.00
66,000
 27.65
 29.10
Fourth Quarter67,771
 22.10
 23.99
60,227
 27.99
 29.95
314,054
    286,979
    
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the following quarters:

Per SharePer Share
2015 20142018 2017
First Quarter$0.23
 $0.22
$0.26
 $0.25
Second Quarter0.23
 0.22
0.26
 0.25
Third Quarter0.24
 0.22
0.26
 0.26
Fourth Quarter0.24
 0.23
0.26
 0.26
Total$0.94
 $0.89
$1.04
 $1.02
We have adopted and publicly announced a common stock repurchase plan. The plan was last amended on September 23, 2015,August 22, 2018, to allow for the repurchase of an additional 200,000 shares of common stock after that date. These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to the status of authorized, but unissued, shares.

12


The following table provides information for the unaudited three month period ended December 31, 2015,2018, with respect to our common stock repurchase plan:

Common Shares Repurchased Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program Maximum Number of Common Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or ProgramsCommon Shares Repurchased Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program Maximum Number of Common Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Number Average Price
Per Common Share
 Number Average Price
Per Common Share
 
Balance, September 30      198,436
      200,244
October 1 - 3122,923
 $24.21
 22,923
 175,513
2,797
 $26.81
 2,797
 197,447
November 1 - 3012,362
 25.89
 12,362
 163,151
3,325
 25.26
 3,325
 194,122
December 1 - 314,493
 26.93
 4,493
 158,658
26,468
 24.07
 26,468
 167,654
Balance, December 3139,778
 $25.04
 39,778
 158,658
32,590
 $24.42
 32,590
 167,654
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans appears under Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Stock Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on (1) NASDAQ, which is comprised of all United States common shares traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Banks, which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph assumes the value of an investment in the Corporation's common stock and each index was $100 at December 31, 20102013 and all dividends arewere reinvested.
 a2018nasdaqgrapha02.jpg
Year ISBA NASDAQ NASDAQ
Banks
 ISBA NASDAQ NASDAQ
Banks
12/31/2010 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/2011 142.50
 99.23
 89.54
12/31/2012 135.30
 116.79
 106.15
12/31/2013 153.50
 163.38
 150.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
 $100.00
12/31/2014 150.50
 187.43
 157.22
 98.00
 114.83
 104.92
12/31/2015 207.70
 200.70
 170.99
 135.30
 122.99
 114.20
12/31/2016 130.50
 134.02
 157.56
12/31/2017 137.20
 173.86
 166.15
12/31/2018 114.10
 168.98
 139.28

13


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Results of Operations (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
The following table outlines the results of operations and provides certain key performance measures as of, and for the years ended, December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
INCOME STATEMENT DATA                  
Interest income$51,502
 $51,148
 $50,418
 $53,123
 $55,590
$63,864
 $58,413
 $53,666
 $51,502
 $51,148
Interest expense10,163
 9,970
 11,021
 13,423
 16,203
15,631
 12,494
 10,865
 10,163
 9,970
Net interest income41,339
 41,178
 39,397
 39,700
 39,387
48,233
 45,919
 42,801
 41,339
 41,178
Provision for loan losses(2,771) (668) 1,111
 2,300
 3,826
978
 253
 (135) (2,771) (668)
Noninterest income10,359
 9,325
 10,175
 11,530
 8,218
10,946
 10,812
 11,108
 10,359
 9,325
Noninterest expenses36,051
 35,103
 33,755
 34,361
 32,215
42,817
 40,225
 37,897
 36,051
 35,103
Federal income tax expense(1)3,288
 2,344
 2,196
 2,363
 1,354
1,363
 3,016
 2,348
 3,288
 2,344
Net Income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
 $12,206
 $10,210
Net income$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
 $15,130
 $13,724
PER SHARE                  
Basic earnings$1.95
 $1.77
 $1.63
 $1.61
 $1.35
$1.78
 $1.69
 $1.77
 $1.95
 $1.77
Diluted earnings$1.90
 $1.74
 $1.59
 $1.56
 $1.31
$1.74
 $1.65
 $1.73
 $1.90
 $1.74
Dividends$0.94
 $0.89
 $0.84
 $0.80
 $0.76
$1.04
 $1.02
 $0.98
 $0.94
 $0.89
Tangible book value*$17.30
 $16.59
 $15.62
 $14.72
 $13.90
Tangible book value (2)
$18.68
 $18.63
 $17.80
 $17.33
 $16.52
Quoted market value                  
High$29.90
 $24.00
 $26.00
 $24.98
 $24.45
$28.25
 $29.95
 $29.90
 $29.90
 $24.00
Low$22.00
 $21.73
 $21.12
 $21.75
 $17.10
$22.50
 $27.60
 $27.25
 $22.00
 $21.73
Close*$29.90
 $22.50
 $23.85
 $21.75
 $23.70
Common shares outstanding*7,799,867
 7,776,274
 7,723,023
 7,671,846
 7,589,226
Close (3)
$22.56
 $28.25
 $27.85
 $29.90
 $22.50
Common shares outstanding (3)
7,870,969
 7,857,293
 7,821,069
 7,799,867
 7,776,274
PERFORMANCE RATIOS                  
Return on average total assets0.95% 0.90% 0.86% 0.88% 0.79%0.77% 0.75% 0.82% 0.95% 0.90%
Return on average shareholders' equity8.33% 8.06% 7.67% 7.60% 6.74%7.26% 6.75% 7.12% 8.33% 8.06%
Return on average tangible shareholders' equity11.46% 10.80% 10.71% 11.41% 10.30%9.14% 9.09% 9.95% 11.46% 10.80%
Net interest margin yield (FTE)(1)3.10% 3.24% 3.22% 3.43% 3.67%2.97% 3.03% 3.00% 3.10% 3.24%
BALANCE SHEET DATA*         
BALANCE SHEET DATA (3)
         
Gross loans$850,492
 $836,550
 $810,777
 $774,627
 $751,610
$1,128,707
 $1,091,519
 $1,010,615
 $850,492
 $836,550
AFS securities$660,136
 $567,534
 $512,062
 $504,010
 $425,120
$494,834
 $548,730
 $554,671
 $656,837
 $561,394
Total assets$1,668,112
 $1,549,543
 $1,493,137
 $1,430,639
 $1,337,925
$1,837,307
 $1,813,130
 $1,732,151
 $1,668,112
 $1,549,543
Deposits$1,164,563
 $1,074,484
 $1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $958,164
$1,292,693
 $1,265,258
 $1,195,040
 $1,164,563
 $1,074,484
Borrowed funds$309,732
 $289,709
 $279,326
 $241,001
 $216,136
$340,299
 $344,878
 $337,694
 $309,732
 $289,709
Shareholders' equity$183,971
 $174,594
 $160,609
 $164,489
 $154,783
$195,519
 $194,905
 $187,899
 $183,971
 $174,594
Gross loans to deposits73.03% 77.86% 77.68% 76.12% 78.44%87.31% 86.27% 84.57% 73.03% 77.86%
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT*         
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT (3)
         
Loans sold with servicing retained$287,029
 $288,639
 $293,665
 $303,425
 $302,636
$259,481
 $266,789
 $272,882
 $287,029
 $288,639
Assets managed by our Investment and Trust Services Department$405,109
 $383,878
 $351,420
 $319,301
 $297,393
$447,487
 $478,146
 $427,693
 $405,109
 $383,878
Total assets under management$2,360,250
 $2,222,060
 $2,138,222
 $2,053,365
 $1,937,954
$2,544,275
 $2,558,065
 $2,432,726
 $2,360,250
 $2,222,060
ASSET QUALITY*         
ASSET QUALITY (3)
         
Nonperforming loans to gross loans0.09% 0.50% 0.42% 1.00% 0.95%0.65% 0.31% 0.17% 0.09% 0.50%
Nonperforming assets to total assets0.07% 0.33% 0.32% 0.68% 0.67%0.42% 0.20% 0.11% 0.07% 0.33%
ALLL to gross loans0.87% 1.21% 1.42% 1.54% 1.65%0.74% 0.71% 0.73% 0.87% 1.21%
CAPITAL RATIOS*         
CAPITAL RATIOS (3)
         
Shareholders' equity to assets11.03% 11.27% 10.76% 11.50% 11.57%10.64% 10.75% 10.85% 11.03% 11.27%
Tier 1 leverage8.52% 8.59% 8.46% 8.29% 8.18%8.72% 8.54% 8.56% 8.52% 8.59%
Common equity tier 1 capital13.24% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
12.58% 12.23% 12.39% 13.44% N/A
Tier 1 risk-based capital13.24% 14.08% 13.68% 13.24% 12.93%12.58% 12.23% 12.39% 13.44% 14.08%
Total risk-based capital13.96% 15.19% 14.93% 14.49% 14.18%13.26% 12.86% 13.04% 14.17% 15.19%
*(1) Calculations are based on a federal income tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 34% for all prior periods.
(2) Tangible book value calculations include unrealized gain/loss on AFS securities.
(3) At end of year

14


The following table outlines our interim results of operations and key performance measures as of, and for the unaudited periods ended:

Quarter to DateQuarter to Date
December 31
2015
 September 30
2015
 June 30
2015
 March 31
2015
 December 31
2014
 September 30
2014
 June 30
2014
 March 31
2014
December 31
2018
 September 30
2018
 June 30
2018
 March 31
2018
 December 31
2017
 September 30
2017
 June 30
2017
 March 31
2017
Total interest income$13,023
 $12,967
 $12,759
 $12,753
 $13,030
 $12,800
 $12,625
 $12,693
$16,611
 $16,419
 $15,713
 $15,121
 $15,078
 $14,976
 $14,498
 $13,861
Total interest expense2,577
 2,580
 2,518
 2,488
 2,504
 2,498
 2,468
 2,500
4,258
 4,231
 3,741
 3,401
 3,435
 3,200
 3,028
 2,831
Net interest income10,446
 10,387
 10,241
 10,265
 10,526
 10,302
 10,157
 10,193
12,353
 12,188
 11,972
 11,720
 11,643
 11,776
 11,470
 11,030
Provision for loan losses(772) (738) (535) (726) (64) (162) (200) (242)342
 (76) 328
 384
 168
 49
 9
 27
Noninterest income2,501
 3,101
 2,629
 2,128
 2,426
 2,216
 2,434
 2,249
2,860
 2,863
 2,736
 2,487
 2,710
 2,698
 2,788
 2,616
Noninterest expenses9,885
 9,161
 8,330
 8,675
 8,923
 8,831
 8,534
 8,815
10,865
 11,072
 10,784
 10,096
 10,628
 10,139
 9,507
 9,951
Federal income tax expense538
 1,002
 977
 771
 648
 444
 692
 560
476
 359
 263
 265
 836
 750
 898
 532
Net income$3,296
 $4,063
 $4,098
 $3,673
 $3,445
 $3,405
 $3,565
 $3,309
$3,530
 $3,696
 $3,333
 $3,462
 $2,721
 $3,536
 $3,844
 $3,136
PER SHARE                              
Basic earnings$0.43
 $0.52
 $0.53
 $0.47
 $0.44
 $0.44
 $0.46
 $0.43
$0.45
 $0.47
 $0.42
 $0.44
 $0.35
 $0.45
 $0.49
 $0.40
Diluted earnings0.41
 0.51
 0.52
 0.46
 0.44
 0.43
 0.45
 0.42
0.44
 0.46
 0.41
 0.43
 0.34
 0.44
 0.48
 0.39
Dividends0.24
 0.24
 0.23
 0.23
 0.23
 0.22
 0.22
 0.22
0.26
 0.26
 0.26
 0.26
 0.26
 0.26
 0.25
 0.25
Quoted Market value*29.90
 23.69
 23.75
 22.90
 22.50
 23.60
 22.95
 23.00
Tangible book value*17.30
 17.06
 17.17
 16.84
 16.59
 16.33
 16.08
 15.82
Quoted market value (1)
22.56
 26.75
 26.65
 27.40
 28.25
 29.00
 28.00
 27.60
Tangible book value (2)
18.68
 19.44
 19.36
 19.16
 18.96
 18.82
 18.62
 18.34
*(1) At end of period
Reclassifications and Restatements:(2) Certain amounts previously reported in the Results of Operations section of this report have been either reclassified or restated to conform with the 2015 presentation. For a complete overviewTangible book value calculations include unrealized gain/loss on restatements impacting the Results of Operations, see pages 4 and 52 of this report.AFS securities.

15


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations. This discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of the consolidated financial statements and statistical data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Executive Summary
We reported record net income of $15,130$14,021 and earnings per common share of $1.95$1.78 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our continued strong2018. Net income and earnings haveper common share for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $13,237 and $1.69, respectively. Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $5,451 when compared to 2017 primarily beenas the result of increasedstrong loan growth, which totaled $37,188 during 2018. Net interest income and continued improvementincreased by $2,314 for the year ended December 31, 2018 in credit quality.comparison to 2017. The improvement in credit quality resulted in a decline in the level of the ALLL in both amount and as a percentage of gross loans, resulting in a reversal of provision for loan losses increased by $725 and was the result of $2,771loan growth, increased charge-offs, and an increase in criticized assets largely related to our agricultural loan portfolio. Noninterest expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018 exceeded noninterest expenses in 2017 due to increased compensation and benefits, certain loan expenses and increased costs related to upgrades with technology and network security. Additionally in 2017, noninterest expenses were reduced by a settlement with an insurance claims administrator in favor of Isabella Bank. Net loan recoveries during 2015 were $71 as compared to net loan charge-offs $732income in 2014. Additionally, we continue to see reductions in loans classified as less than satisfactory.2018 has benefited from the lower federal statutory tax rate established by the Tax Act.
During the year,As of December 31, 2018, total assets grew by 7.65% to $1,668,112, and assets under management increased to $2,360,250 which includeswere $1,837,307 and $2,544,275, respectively. Assets under management include loans sold and serviced of $259,481 and assets managed by our Investment and Trust Services Department of $692,138.$447,487, in addition to assets on our consolidated balance sheet. In 2015, we had total2018, the loan growth of $13,942 which$37,188 was driven byattributable to commercial and agricultural loanportfolio growth of $26,301. This was partially offset by declines$24,770 and increases in both residential real estate and consumer loans of $12,359 as new loan originations were less than$13,526, offset by a $1,108 decline in the agricultural portfolio. Loan growth was funded through maturities and the receipt of principal payments by borrowers.
We increased our in the AFS securities portfolio by $92,602 during 2015 to continue providingand growth in our balance sheettotal deposits. All regulatory capital ratios for the Bank exceeded the minimum thresholds to increase interest income. be considered a "well capitalized" institution.
Our net yield on interest earning assets of 3.10% remains at historically low levels. While we expect the Federal Reserve Bank(FTE) was 2.97% for 2018 and experienced a slight decline in comparison to increase short termprior periods. The FRB increased short-term interest rates in 2016,during each quarter of 2018. Over the next few years, we do not anticipate any significant improvementsincremental improvement in our net yield on interest earning assets as the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities will likely increase faster than thosea result of interest earning assets. Net interest income will increase only through continueda combination of our asset mix shifting to an increasing percentage of loans compared to investment securities, strategic growth in loans, investments, and other income earning assets.market driven loan pricing. We are committed to increasing earnings and dedicated to providing long term sustainableshareholder value through growth to enable us to increase shareholder value.
While we have been able to growin our commercialloan portfolio, growth in our investment and agricultural loan portfolios,trust services, increasing our residential real estatepresence within our geographic footprint, and managing operating costs.
consumer loan portfoliosThe current interest rate environment, which consists of low rates and a flat yield curve, is having an impact on investor confidence in the financial sector. Interest rate environments with flattened yield curves generally result in a decline in the market price of bank stocks. In early 2017, the difference between the yields of the 2-year treasury and 10-year treasury notes was above 120 basis points. Since the first part of December 2018, the same yield variance has remained below 20 basis points, which is not favorable for financial institutions.
Bank stocks, in general, were negatively impacted in 2018 by the interest rate environment. The Nasdaq Bank Stock Index declined 19% in the fourth quarter of 2018. The price per share of our common stock fell approximately 16% from $26.75 on September 28, 2018 to $22.56 on December 31, 2018. Even within this declining period, there were a few trades that we were aware of at $25.95 per share between December 14, 2018 and December 24, 2018. Historically, our stock price lags market changes, both upward and downward, 60 to 90 days.
Our Board of Directors and management team closely monitor our stock price, and are focused on improving the metrics which should serve to have a favorable impact on the stock price. In the second half of 2018, we engaged the services of an investor relations firm whose mission is to help build brand awareness of Isabella Bank Corporation in the investment community, and get management in front of selected investment professionals and advisors through small group presentations. The feedback from this strategy has been more challenging. To generate growth in these portfolios, we are implementing new
products, enhancing our marketing efforts, streamlining delivery channels for direct and indirect loans, and expanding our
service area. These initiatives are designed to attract new customers while expanding our relationships with current customers
to improve earnings.
Acquisitions
On July 31, 2015, we completed the acquisition of a branch from Flagstar Bank, FSB located in Saginaw, Michigan. In addition to real estate and equipment, we assumed deposit liabilities of $44,290 and recorded $156 of core deposit intangibles and $2,061 of goodwill, which represented the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired.
On August 28, 2015, we completed the acquisition of a branch from Independent Bank located in Midland, Michigan. In addition to real estate and equipment, we assumed $8,658 of deposit liabilities and recorded $50 of core deposit intangibles and $602 of goodwill, which represented the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired.

positive thus far.
Recent Legislation
The Health Care and EducationDodd-Frank Act of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, and the JOBS Act, havehas already had, and areis expected to continue to have, a negative impact on our operating results. Of these four acts, the Dodd-Frank Act has had the most significant impact. The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB which has made significant changes in the regulation of financial institutions aimed at strengthening the oversight of the federal government over the operation of the financial services sector and increasing the

protection of consumers. NewRecent regulations issued by the CFPB regarding consumer lending, including residential mortgage lending, have increased our compensation and outside advisor costsexpenses and this trend is expected to continue.
On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum

16


required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules, which will beare being gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically.
ReclassificationsOn December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Restatements:Jobs Act was enacted. The law established a flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%, effective January 1, 2018, and eliminated the corporate alternative minimum tax which can be carried forward and used to reduce future income tax. The tax law provided for a wide array of changes, only some of which had a direct impact on our federal income tax expense. Some of these changes included, but are not limited to, the following items: limits to the deduction for net interest expense; immediate expense (for tax purposes) for certain qualified depreciable assets; elimination or reduction of certain deductions related to meals and entertainment expenses; and limits to the deductibility of deposit insurance premiums.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported in the Management's Discussionmanagement's discussion and Analysisanalysis of Financial Conditionfinancial condition and Resultsresults of Operations section of this reportoperations for 2017 and 2016 have been either reclassified or restated to conform with the 20152018 presentation. For a complete overview on restatements impacting Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, see pages 4 and 52 of this report.
Other
We have not received any notices of regulatory actions as of February 19, 2016.March 12, 2019.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are set forth in “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Of these significant accounting policies, we consider our policies regarding the ALLL, acquisition intangibles and goodwill, and the determination of the fair value and assessment of OTTI of investment securities to be our most critical accounting policies.
The ALLL requires our most subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions and other external factors can have a significant impact on the ALLL and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of operations. We have developed policies and procedures for assessing the appropriateness of the ALLL, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to our loan portfolio. Our assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which is not known to us at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning our ALLL and related matters, see the detailed discussion to follow under the caption “AllowanceAllowance for Loan and Lease Losses”Losses and “Note 5Note 4Loans and ALLL” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that we determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity, and record theirthe fair value on the date of acquisition. We employ a variety of measures in the determination of the fair value, including the use of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and projected future revenue streams. For certain items that we believe we have the appropriate expertise to determine the fair value, we may choose to use our own calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is not easily determined, we consult with outside partiesindependent experts to determine the fair value of the identified asset or liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and the net value of assets acquired on our balance sheet, including identifiable intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired on at least an annual basis.
AFS securities are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value included as a component of other comprehensive income. Declines in the fair value of AFS securities below their cost that are other-than-temporary are reflected as realized losses in the consolidated statements of income. We evaluate AFS securities for indications of losses that are considered other-than-temporary, if any, on a regular basis. The market values for most AFS investment securities are typically obtained from outside sources and applied to individual securities within the portfolio. Municipal securities for which no readily determinable market values are available are priced using fair value curves which most closely match the securities' characteristics.

17


Average Balances, Interest Rate,Rates, and Net Interest Income
The following schedules present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearningnon-earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities for the last three years. These schedules also present an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a FTE basis using a 34% federal income tax rate.rate of 21% in 2018 and 34% in 2017 and 2016. Loans in nonaccrual status, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan balances. FRB and FHLB restricted equity holdings are included in accrued income and other assets.

Year Ended December 31
 2018 2017 2016
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS                 
Loans$1,120,021
 $49,229
 4.40% $1,040,630
 $43,537
 4.18% $922,333
 $38,537
 4.18%
Taxable investment securities (1)
341,095
 8,294
 2.43% 361,783
 8,564
 2.37% 392,810
 8,746
 2.23%
Nontaxable investment securities191,281
 7,115
 3.72% 202,375
 9,126
 4.51% 205,450
 9,351
 4.55%
Fed funds sold4
 
 % 663
 5
 0.75% 
 
 %
Other35,719
 1,062
 2.97% 26,815
 737
 2.75% 25,557
 668
 2.61%
Total earning assets1,688,120
 65,700
 3.89% 1,632,266
 61,969
 3.80% 1,546,150
 57,302
 3.71%
NONEARNING ASSETS                 
Allowance for loan losses(8,094)     (7,607)     (7,638)    
Cash and demand deposits due from banks19,770
     19,309
     18,178
    
Premises and equipment28,349
     28,933
     28,670
    
Accrued income and other assets87,895
     99,456
     101,995
    
Total assets$1,816,040
     $1,772,357
     $1,687,355
    
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                 
Interest bearing demand deposits$229,411
 $267
 0.12% $213,648
 $232
 0.11% $203,198
 $163
 0.08%
Savings deposits361,743
 1,698
 0.47% 356,963
 1,091
 0.31% 336,859
 663
 0.20%
Time deposits454,916
 7,296
 1.60% 433,562
 5,486
 1.27% 429,731
 5,010
 1.17%
Borrowed funds344,352
 6,370
 1.85% 352,400
 5,685
 1.61% 319,049
 5,029
 1.58%
Total interest bearing liabilities1,390,422
 15,631
 1.12% 1,356,573
 12,494
 0.92% 1,288,837
 10,865
 0.84%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                 
Demand deposits224,777
     208,988
     194,892
    
Other7,597
     10,641
     9,841
    
Shareholders’ equity193,244
     196,155
     193,785
    
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,816,040
     $1,772,357
     $1,687,355
    
Net interest income (FTE)  $50,069
     $49,475
     $46,437
  
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)    2.97%     3.03%     3.00%

Year Ended December 31
 2015 2014 2013
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield /
Rate
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS                 
Loans$829,903
 $35,853
 4.32% $816,105
 $36,629
 4.49% $792,430
 $37,575
 4.74%
Taxable investment securities395,981
 9,053
 2.29% 357,250
 8,092
 2.27% 335,575
 7,228
 2.15%
Nontaxable investment securities205,242
 9,870
 4.81% 194,751
 9,877
 5.07% 165,774
 8,294
 5.00%
Other25,947
 600
 2.31% 25,784
 519
 2.01% 28,306
 502
 1.77%
Total earning assets1,457,073
 55,376
 3.80% 1,393,890
 55,117
 3.95% 1,322,085
 53,599
 4.05%
NONEARNING ASSETS                 
Allowance for loan losses(9,275)     (10,973)     (11,877)    
Cash and demand deposits due from banks17,925
     18,552
     18,162
    
Premises and equipment26,968
     25,957
     25,993
    
Accrued income and other assets98,805
     94,754
     94,077
    
Total assets$1,591,496
     $1,522,180
     $1,448,440
    
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                 
Interest bearing demand deposits$195,260
 155
 0.08% $191,750
 157
 0.08% $183,665
 161
 0.09%
Savings deposits293,703
 449
 0.15% 260,469
 374
 0.14% 242,777
 366
 0.15%
Time deposits433,409
 5,246
 1.21% 448,971
 5,764
 1.28% 456,774
 6,613
 1.45%
Borrowed funds295,641
 4,313
 1.46% 274,080
 3,675
 1.34% 251,590
 3,881
 1.54%
Total interest bearing liabilities1,218,013
 10,163
 0.83% 1,175,270
 9,970
 0.85% 1,134,806
 11,021
 0.97%
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES                 
Demand deposits181,939
     165,860
     141,872
    
Other10,001
     10,773
     8,752
    
Shareholders’ equity181,543
     170,277
     163,010
    
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,591,496
     $1,522,180
     $1,448,440
    
Net interest income (FTE)  $45,213
     $45,147
     $42,578
  
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)    3.10%     3.24%     3.22%

18


Net Interest Income(1) Includes taxable AFS securities and equity securities
Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest expensesexpense on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income which includes loan fees, is influenced by changes in the balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest rates. We exert some control over these factors; however, FRB monetary policy and competition have a significant impact. For

analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to an FTE basis by addingincludng the income tax savings from interest on tax exempt loans, and nontaxable investment securities, thus making year to year comparisons more meaningful. The FTE adjustment is based on a federal income tax rate of 21% for 2018 and 34% for 2017 and 2016.
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
The following table sets forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For the purpose of this table, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:
Volume—change in volume multiplied by the previous period's FTE rate.
Rate—change in the FTE rate multiplied by the previous period's volume.
All interest income presented in the table below is reported on a FTE basis using a federal income tax rate of 21% for 2018 and 34% for 2017 and 2016. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
2015 Compared to 2014   Increase (Decrease) Due to 2014 Compared to 2013   Increase (Decrease) Due to2018 Compared to 2017 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to
 2017 Compared to 2016 
 Increase (Decrease) Due to

Volume Rate Net Volume Rate NetVolume Rate Net Volume Rate Net
Changes in interest income                      
Loans$612
 $(1,388) $(776) $1,101
 $(2,047) $(946)$3,423
 $2,269
 $5,692
 $4,949
 $51
 $5,000
Taxable investment securities885
 76
 961
 480
 384
 864
(499) 229
 (270) (715) 533
 (182)
Nontaxable investment securities518
 (525) (7) 1,468
 115
 1,583
(479) (1,532) (2,011) (139) (86) (225)
Fed Funds Sold
 (5) (5) 5
 
 5
Other3
 78
 81
 (47) 64
 17
261
 64
 325
 34
 35
 69
Total changes in interest income2,018
 (1,759) 259
 3,002
 (1,484) 1,518
2,706
 1,025
 3,731
 4,134
 533
 4,667
Changes in interest expense                      
Interest bearing demand deposits3
 (5) (2) 7
 (11) (4)18
 17
 35
 9
 60
 69
Savings deposits50
 25
 75
 26
 (18) 8
15
 592
 607
 42
 386
 428
Time deposits(195) (323) (518) (111) (738) (849)281
 1,529
 1,810
 45
 431
 476
Borrowed funds301
 337
 638
 329
 (535) (206)(132) 817
 685
 536
 120
 656
Total changes in interest expense159
 34
 193
 251
 (1,302) (1,051)182
 2,955
 3,137
 632
 997
 1,629
Net change in interest margin (FTE)$1,859
 $(1,793) $66
 $2,751
 $(182) $2,569
$2,524
 $(1,930) $594
 $3,502
 $(464) $3,038
Our net yield on interest earning assets remains at historically low levels.remained unchanged during most of 2018, improving slightly in the fourth quarter. The persistent low interest rate environment coupledcontinuing flattening of the yield curve and rising deposit rates combined with an increase in thea high concentration of AFS securities as a percentage of earning assets has also placed downward pressure on net interest margin yield. While we anticipate that the FRB will increase short term interest rates in 2016, we do not expect any significant change in our net yield on interest earning assets as the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities will likely increase as fast as those of interest earning assets. Net interest income will increase only through continued balance sheet growth.margin.
 Average Yield / Rate for the Three Month Periods Ended:

December 31
2018
 September 30
2018
 June 30
2018
 March 31
2018
 December 31
2017
Total earning assets4.01% 3.94% 3.84% 3.77% 3.86%
Total interest bearing liabilities1.23% 1.20% 1.08% 0.99% 1.01%
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)3.01% 2.95% 2.95% 2.95% 3.02%
 Quarter to Date Net Interest Income (FTE)

December 31
2018
 September 30
2018
 June 30
2018
 March 31
2018
 December 31
2017
Total interest income (FTE)$17,005
 $16,873
 $16,191
 $15,631
 $15,939
Total interest expense4,258
 4,231
 3,741
 3,401
 3,435
Net interest income (FTE)$12,747
 $12,642
 $12,450
 $12,230
 $12,504
 Average Yield / Rate for the Three Month Periods Ended:

December 31
2015
 September 30
2015
 June 30
2015
 March 31
2015
 December 31
2014
Total earning assets3.73% 3.79% 3.81% 3.88% 3.97%
Total interest bearing liabilities0.83% 0.84% 0.84% 0.84% 0.85%
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)3.04% 3.09% 3.11% 3.18% 3.26%


19


 Quarter to Date Net Interest Income (FTE)

December 31
2015
 September 30
2015
 June 30
2015
 March 31
2015
 December 31
2014
Total interest income (FTE)$13,970
 $13,919
 $13,748
 $13,742
 $14,019
Total interest expense2,577
 2,580
 2,518
 2,488
 2,504
Net interest income (FTE)$11,393
 $11,339
 $11,230
 $11,254
 $11,515
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The viability of any financial institution is ultimately determined by its management of credit risk. Loans represent our single largest concentration of risk. The ALLL is our estimation of incurred losses within the existing loan portfolio. We allocate the ALLL throughout the loan portfolio based on our assessment of the underlying risks associated with each loan segment. Our assessments include allocations based on specific impairment valuation allowances, historical charge-offs, internally assigned credit risk ratings, and past due and nonaccrual balances. A portion of the ALLL is not allocated to any one loan segment, but is instead a reflectionrepresentation of other qualitative risks that reflectsreflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
The following table summarizes our charge-offs, recoveries, provisionsprovision for loan losses, and ALLL balances as of, and for the unaudited three month periods ended:

December 31
2015
 September 30
2015
 June 30
2015
 March 31
2015
 December 31
2014
December 31
2018
 September 30
2018
 June 30
2018
 March 31
2018
 December 31
2017
Total charge-offs$238
 $210
 $296
 $160
 $351
$253
 $179
 $566
 $103
 $401
Total recoveries210
 148
 231
 386
 115
186
 155
 238
 219
 233
Net loan charge-offs28
 62
 65
 (226) 236
Net loan charge-offs to average loans outstanding
 0.01 % 0.01 % (0.03)% 0.03 %
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)67
 24
 328
 (116) 168
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding0.01%  % 0.03% (0.01)% 0.02%
Provision for loan losses$(772) $(738) $(535) $(726) $(64)$342
 $(76) $328
 $384
 $168
Provision for loan losses to average loans outstanding(0.09)% (0.09)% (0.07)% (0.09)% (0.01)%0.03% (0.01)% 0.03% 0.04 % 0.02%
ALLL$7,400
 $8,200
 $9,000
 $9,600
 $10,100
$8,375
 $8,100
 $8,200
 $8,200
 $7,700
ALLL as a % of loans at end of period0.87 % 0.98 % 1.08 % 1.17 % 1.21 %0.74% 0.71 % 0.71% 0.75 % 0.71%
The following table summarizes our charge-off and recovery activity for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
ALLL at beginning of period$10,100
 $11,500
 $11,936
 $12,375
 $12,373
$7,700
 $7,400
 $7,400
 $10,100
 $11,500
Charge-offs                  
Commercial and agricultural134
 590
 907
 1,672
 1,984
626
 265
 57
 134
 590
Residential real estate397
 722
 1,004
 1,142
 2,240
151
 200
 574
 397
 722
Consumer373
 316
 429
 542
 552
324
 306
 285
 373
 316
Total charge-offs904
 1,628
 2,340
 3,356
 4,776
1,101
 771
 916
 904
 1,628
Recoveries                  
Commercial and agricultural549
 550
 363
 240
 461
328
 453
 540
 549
 550
Residential real estate220
 197
 181
 122
 177
261
 206
 287
 220
 197
Consumer206
 149
 249
 255
 314
209
 159
 224
 206
 149
Total recoveries975
 896
 793
 617
 952
798
 818
 1,051
 975
 896
Provision for loan losses(2,771) (668) 1,111
 2,300
 3,826
978
 253
 (135) (2,771) (668)
ALLL at end of period7,400
 10,100
 11,500
 11,936
 12,375
$8,375
 $7,700
 $7,400
 $7,400
 $10,100
Net loan charge-offs$(71) $732
 $1,547
 $2,739
 $3,824
Net loan charge-offs to average loans outstanding(0.01)% 0.09% 0.20% 0.36% 0.51%
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)$303
 $(47) $(135) $(71) $732
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding0.03% % (0.01)% (0.01)% 0.09%
ALLL as a% of loans at end of period0.87 % 1.21% 1.42% 1.54% 1.65%0.74% 0.71% 0.73 % 0.87 % 1.21%


20

Table of Contents

As theWe experienced a higher level of net loans charged-off declinecharge-offs in 2018 when compared to 2017 which was significantly related to one borrower and is therefore, not indicative of a trend in charge-off activity. While we have experienced a slight deterioration in credit quality indicators continue to improve, we have reduced the ALLL in
both amount and as a percentage of loans. While more volatile, loans individually evaluated for impairment have been relatively flat until the 4th quarter of 2015. The decline in loans collectively impaired illustrates the downward trend we are experiencing inrecent periods, credit quality remains strong. Overall, our overall level of ALLLrequired reserve is modest due to gross loans.strong credit quality, low historical loss factors, and a low amount of net charge-offs. The following table illustrates our changes within the two main components of the ALLL.ALLL as of:

December 31
2015
 September 30
2015
 June 30
2015
 March 31
2015
 December 31
2014
December 31
2018
 September 30
2018
 June 30
2018
 March 31
2018
 December 31
2017
ALLL                  
Individually evaluated for impairment$2,820
 $3,217
 $3,202
 $3,361
 $3,427
$1,938
 $2,074
 $2,059
 $2,503
 $2,130
Collectively evaluated for impairment4,580
 4,983
 5,798
 6,239
 6,673
6,437
 6,026
 6,141
 5,697
 5,570
Total$7,400
 $8,200
 $9,000
 $9,600
 $10,100
$8,375
 $8,100
 $8,200
 $8,200
 $7,700
ALLL to gross loans                  
Individually evaluated for impairment0.33% 0.38% 0.38% 0.41% 0.41%0.17% 0.18% 0.18% 0.23% 0.20%
Collectively evaluated for impairment0.54% 0.60% 0.70% 0.76% 0.80%0.57% 0.53% 0.53% 0.52% 0.51%
Total0.87% 0.98% 1.08% 1.17% 1.21%0.74% 0.71% 0.71% 0.75% 0.71%
For further discussion of the allocation of the ALLL, see “Note 5Note 4Loans and ALLL”ALLL of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Loans Past Due and Loans in Nonaccrual Status
Fluctuations in past due and nonaccrual status loans can have a significant impact on the ALLL. To determine the potential impact and corresponding estimated losses, we analyze our historical loss trends on loans past due greater than 30 days and nonaccrual status loans. We monitor all loans that are past due and loans in nonaccrual status for indications of additional deterioration.

Total Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans as of December 31Total Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans as of December 31
2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Commercial and agricultural$2,247
 $4,805
 $3,621
 $7,271
 $7,420
Commercial$2,722
 $2,518
 $3,347
 $1,015
 $4,496
Agricultural5,377
 2,367
 1,251
 1,232
 309
Residential real estate2,520
 4,181
 7,008
 5,431
 5,297
3,208
 4,881
 2,716
 2,520
 4,181
Consumer31
 138
 259
 199
 186
105
 70
 115
 31
 138
Total$4,798
 $9,124
 $10,888
 $12,901
 $12,903
$11,412
 $9,836
 $7,429
 $4,798
 $9,124
Total past due and nonaccrual loans to gross loans0.56% 1.09% 1.34% 1.67% 1.72%1.01% 0.90% 0.74% 0.56% 1.09%
Declines in pastPast due and nonaccrual status loans during 2015 arehave increased over the last year but continue to be at low levels as a result of improved loanstrong repayment performance. A summary of loans past due and in nonaccrual status, including the composition of the ending balance of nonaccrual status loans by type, is included in “Note 54Loans and ALLL” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
We have taken a proactive approach to avoid foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with us in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable. While thisThis approach has allowed certain borrowers to develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure, it has contributed to a significant increase in the level of loans classified as TDRs.foreclosure. The modifications have been successful for us and our customers as very few of the modified loans have resulted in foreclosures. At the time of the TDR, the loan is reviewed to determine whether or not to classify the loan as accrual or nonaccrual status. The majority of new modifications result in terms that satisfy our criteria for continued interest accrual. TDRs that have been placed onin nonaccrual status may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.performance and achievement of current payment status.
We restructure debt with borrowers who due to temporary financial difficulties are unable to service their debt under the original terms. We may extend the amortization period, reduce interest rates, allow interest only payment structures, forgive principal, forgive interest, or grant a combination of these modifications. Typically, the modifications are for a period of fivethree years or less. There were no TDRs that were Governmentgovernment sponsored as of December 31, 20152018 or December 31, 20142017.

21


Losses associated with TDRs, if any, are included in the estimation of the ALLL induring the quarter in which a loan is identified as a TDR, and we review the analysis of the ALLL estimation each reporting period thereafter to ensure its continued appropriateness.
The following tables providetable provides a roll-forward of TDRs for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2015:2018:

Accruing Interest Nonaccrual TotalAccruing Interest Nonaccrual Total
Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 BalanceNumber
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance Number
of
Loans
 Balance
January 1, 2014165
 $24,423
 15
 $1,442
 180
 $25,865
January 1, 2017153
 $20,593
 5
 $789
 158
 $21,382
New modifications30
 2,647
 5
 367
 35
 3,014
20
 7,128
 8
 1,138
 28
 8,266
Principal advances (payments)
 (1,501) 
 (254) 
 (1,755)
 (1,501) 
 (127) 
 (1,628)
Loans paid-off(32) (2,964) (3) (90) (35) (3,054)
Loans paid off(22) (1,500) 
 
 (22) (1,500)
Partial charge-offs
 (70) 
 (193) 
 (263)
 
 
 (170) 
 (170)
Balances charged-off(3) (13) (3) (115) (6) (128)(2) (62) 
 
 (2) (62)
Transfers to OREO
 
 (5) (338) (5) (338)
 
 (2) (91) (2) (91)
Transfers to accrual status5
 502
 (5) (502) 
 
2
 126
 (2) (126) 
 
Transfers to nonaccrual status(9) (2,093) 9
 2,093
 
 
(4) (1,500) 4
 1,500
 
 
December 31, 2014156
 20,931
 13
 2,410
 169
 23,341
December 31, 2017147
 23,284
 13
 2,913
 160
 26,197
New modifications28
 6,490
 4
 491
 32
 6,981
27
 6,623
 18
 1,733
 45
 8,356
Principal advances (payments)
 (1,205) 
 (1,002) 
 (2,207)
 (1,456) 
 (714) 
 (2,170)
Loans paid-off(26) (5,227) (7) (597) (33) (5,824)
Loans paid off(35) (4,361) (7) (819) (42) (5,180)
Partial charge-offs
 
 
 (87) 
 (87)
 
 
 (39) 
 (39)
Balances charged-off(2) (83) 
 
 (2) (83)
 
 (1) (7) (1) (7)
Transfers to OREO
 
 (6) (796) (6) (796)
 
 (1) (206) (1) (206)
Transfers to accrual status3
 292
 (3) (292) 
 
1
 520
 (1) (520) 
 
Transfers to nonaccrual status(4) (267) 4
 267
 
 
(7) (1,210) 7
 1,210
 
 
December 31, 2015155
 $20,931
 5
 $394
 160
 $21,325
December 31, 2018133
 $23,400
 28
 $3,551
 161
 $26,951
The following table summarizes our TDRs as of December 31:

2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016

Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual TotalAccruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total
Current$20,550
 $146
 $20,696
 $20,012
 $272
 $20,284
 $21,690
 $1,189
 $22,879
$21,794
 $2,673
 $24,467
 $21,234
 $
 $21,234
 $17,557
 $559
 $18,116
Past due 30-59 days357
 
 357
 804
 592
 1,396
 2,158
 37
 2,195
899
 
 899
 1,778
 805
 2,583
 2,898
 230
 3,128
Past due 60-89 days24
 
 24
 115
 3
 118
 575
 
 575
707
 
 707
 219
 708
 927
 138
 
 138
Past due 90 days or more
 248
 248
 
 1,543
 1,543
 
 216
 216

 878
 878
 53
 1,400
 1,453
 
 
 
Total$20,931
 $394
 $21,325
 $20,931
 $2,410
 $23,341
 $24,423
 $1,442
 $25,865
$23,400
 $3,551
 $26,951
 $23,284
 $2,913
 $26,197
 $20,593
 $789
 $21,382

2012 20112015 2014
Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual TotalAccruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total Accruing
Interest
 Nonaccrual Total
Current$16,301
 $941
 $17,242
 $16,125
 $514
 $16,639
$20,550
 $146
 $20,696
 $20,012
 $272
 $20,284
Past due 30-59 days158
 561
 719
 1,564
 344
 1,908
357
 
 357
 804
 592
 1,396
Past due 60-89 days72
 41
 113
 50
 85
 135
24
 
 24
 115
 3
 118
Past due 90 days or more
 1,281
 1,281
 
 74
 74

 248
 248
 
 1,543
 1,543
Total$16,531
 $2,824
 $19,355
 $17,739
 $1,017
 $18,756
$20,931
 $394
 $21,325
 $20,931
 $2,410
 $23,341
Additional disclosures about TDRs are included in “Note 54Loans and ALLL” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

22


Impaired Loans
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of December 31:
2015 20142018 2017

Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
 Outstanding
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
Recorded
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
 Recorded
Balance
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 Valuation
Allowance
TDRs                      
Commercial real estate$7,619
 $7,858
 $818
 $10,222
 $10,501
 $1,276
$6,507
 $6,840
 $437
 $5,780
 $6,082
 $626
Commercial other188
 199
 11
 715
 945
 4
1,713
 1,713
 
 2,219
 2,219
 24
Agricultural real estate3,549
 3,549
 
 1,423
 1,423
 
7,452
 7,452
 112
 7,913
 7,913
 
Agricultural other519
 519
 2
 66
 186
 
5,288
 5,331
 
 2,685
 2,685
 
Residential real estate senior liens9,155
 9,457
 1,851
 10,462
 11,019
 1,847
5,923
 6,205
 1,181
 7,460
 7,839
 1,406
Residential real estate junior liens133
 133
 28
 246
 246
 49
12
 12
 2
 44
 44
 7
Home equity lines of credit127
 427
 
 153
 453
 46
47
 347
 
 79
 379
 
Consumer secured35
 35
 
 54
 54
 1
9
 9
 
 17
 17
 
Total TDRs21,325
 22,177
 2,710
 23,341
 24,827
 3,223
26,951
 27,909
 1,732
 26,197
 27,178
 2,063
Other impaired loans                      
Commercial real estate162
 175
 
 1,009
 1,195
 3
256
 318
 
 100
 161
 
Commercial other
 
 
 83
 95
 
1,423
 1,530
 6
 
 
 
Agricultural real estate
 
 
 106
 106
 
557
 558
 
 
 
 
Agricultural other
 
 
 
 
 
1,001
 1,000
 20
 
 
 
Residential real estate senior liens841
 1,308
 108
 1,183
 1,763
 168
911
 1,084
 180
 356
 620
 67
Residential real estate junior liens10
 30
 2
 19
 29
 4

 
 
 
 
 
Home equity lines of credit
 7
 
 97
 197
 29

 
 
 
 
 
Consumer secured
 
 
 10
 10
 

 
 
 
 
 
Total other impaired loans1,013
 1,520
 110
 2,507
 3,395
 204
4,148
 4,490
 206
 456
 781
 67
Total impaired loans$22,338
 $23,697
 $2,820
 $25,848
 $28,222
 $3,427
$31,099
 $32,399
 $1,938
 $26,653
 $27,959
 $2,130
Additional disclosure related to impaired loans is included in “Note 54Loans and ALLL” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Nonperforming Assets
The following table summarizes our nonperforming assets as of December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Nonaccrual status loans$792
 $4,044
 $3,244
 $7,303
 $6,389
$7,260
 $3,027
 $1,060
 $792
 $4,044
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
 148
 142
 428
 760
113
 395
 633
 
 148
Total nonperforming loans792
 4,192
 3,386
 7,731
 7,149
7,373
 3,422
 1,693
 792
 4,192
Foreclosed assets421
 885
 1,412
 2,018
 1,876
355
 291
 231
 421
 885
Total nonperforming assets$1,213
 $5,077
 $4,798
 $9,749
 $9,025
$7,728
 $3,713
 $1,924
 $1,213
 $5,077
Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans0.09% 0.50% 0.42% 1.00% 0.95%0.65% 0.31% 0.17% 0.09% 0.50%
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets0.07% 0.33% 0.32% 0.68% 0.67%0.42% 0.20% 0.11% 0.07% 0.33%
AfterTypically after a loan is 90 days past due, it is placed onin nonaccrual status unless it is well secured and in the process of short-term collection. Upon transferring a loan to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge-offs are necessary. Loans may be placed back on accrual status after six months months of continued performance. Totalperformance and achievement of current payment status. While the level of nonperforming loans continuehas increased in recent periods, it remains low in comparison to improve with current levels reflecting historic lows.peer banks.

23


Included in the nonaccrual loan balances above were loans currentlyalso classified as TDRsTDR as of December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Commercial and agricultural$232
 $1,995
 $833
 $2,325
 $520
$3,551
 $2,679
 $405
 $232
 $1,995
Residential real estate162
 262
 609
 499
 497

 234
 384
 162
 262
Consumer
 153
 
 
 

 
 
 
 153
Total$394
 $2,410
 $1,442
 $2,824
 $1,017
$3,551
 $2,913
 $789
 $394
 $2,410
Additional disclosures about nonaccrual status loans are included in “Note 54Loans and ALLL”of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
We continue to devote considerable attention to identifying impaired loans and adjusting the net carrying value of these loans to their current net realizable values through the establishment of a specific reserve or the recording of a charge-off. We believe that we have identified all impaired loans as of December 31, 2015.2018.
We believe that theThe level of the ALLL is appropriate as of December 31, 20152018. We will continue to closely monitor overall credit quality indicators and our policies and procedures related to the analysis of the ALLL to ensure that the ALLL remains at the appropriate level.

24


Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expenses
Significant noninterest accountincome balances are highlighted in the following table with additional descriptions of significant fluctuationstables for the years ended December 31:

    Change   Change
 2015 2014 $ % 2013 $ %
Service charges and fees             
ATM and debit card fees$2,411
 $2,084
 $327
 15.69 % $1,944
 $140
 7.20 %
NSF and overdraft fees1,855
 2,156
 (301) (13.96)% 2,243
 (87) (3.88)%
Freddie Mac servicing fee712
 720
 (8) (1.11)% 737
 (17) (2.31)%
Service charges on deposit accounts345
 354
 (9) (2.54)% 373
 (19) (5.09)%
Net OMSR income (loss)(14) (36) 22
 61.11 % 269
 (305) (113.38)%
All other128
 133
 (5) (3.76)% 116
 17
 14.66 %
Total service charges and fees5,437
 5,411
 26
 0.48 % 5,682
 (271) (4.77)%
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans573
 514
 59
 11.48 % 962
 (448) (46.57)%
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies771
 751
 20
 2.66 % 732
 19
 2.60 %
Net gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities163
 97
 66
 68.04 % 171
 (74) (43.27)%
Other             
Trust and brokerage advisory fees2,161
 2,069
 92
 4.45 % 1,858
 211
 11.36 %
Corporate Settlement Solutions joint venture463
 76
 387
 509.21 % 143
 (67) (46.85)%
Other791
 407
 384
 94.35 % 627
 (220) (35.09)%
Total other3,415
 2,552
 863
 33.82 % 2,628
 (76) (2.89)%
Total noninterest income$10,359
 $9,325
 $1,034
 11.09 % $10,175
 $(850) (8.35)%

    Change   Change
 2018 2017 $ % 2016 $ %
Service charges and fees$6,210
 $6,013
 $197
 3.28 % $5,230
 $783
 14.97 %
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies707
 726
 (19) (2.62)% 761
 (35) (4.60)%
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans525
 647
 (122) (18.86)% 651
 (4) (0.61)%
Net gains on sale of AFS securities
 142
 (142) (100.00)% 245
 (103) (42.04)%
Other             
Investment and Trust advisory fees2,836
 2,607
 229
 8.78 % 2,705
 (98) (3.62)%
Corporate Settlement Solutions joint venture274
 164
 110
 67.07 % 415
 (251) (60.48)%
Gain on redemption of BOLI policies
 
 
  % 469
 (469) N/M
Other394
 513
 (119) (23.20)% 632
 (119) (18.83)%
Total other3,504
 3,284
 220
 6.70 % 4,221
 (937) (22.20)%
Total noninterest income$10,946
 $10,812
 $134
 1.24 % $11,108
 $(296) (2.66)%
Significant changes in noninterest income are detailed below:
Service charges and fees include ATM and debit card fees, increased during 2015 as a result of marketing incentives. While we do not anticipate significantNSF and overdraft fees, loan servicing fee income, OMSR income and other deposit account fees. Fluctuations have primarily been attributed to changes to ourin ATM and debit card fees we doand OMSR income. ATM and debit card fees fluctuate from period-to-period based primarily on usage of ATM and debit cards. We developed initiatives to increase ATM and debit card income in 2018 and expect that fees will continue to increase in 20162019 as the usage of ATM and debit cards continues to increase.
NSF and overdraft fees fluctuate from period-to-period based on customer activity as well as the number of business days OMSR income results are driven, in the period. We anticipate NSF and overdraft feespart, by changes in 2016 to approximate 2015 levels.
Offeringoffering rates on residential mortgage loans, as well asanticipated prepayments in the decline in loan demand, have beenservicing-retained portfolio, and the most significant drivers behindvolume of loans within the servicing-retained portfolio. As such, OMSR income during 2019 could experience fluctuations in theand may not exceed 2018 OMSR income.
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans and net OMSR income (loss). Mortgage rates are expected to approximate current levelsfluctuates primarily as the result of a change in the foreseeable futureamount of loans sold, and purchase money mortgage activity is anticipated to increase as a resultthe amount of our various initiatives to drive growth. As such, we anticipate increases in origination volumes and in turn, an increase in gainsloans sold can fluctuate based on sale of mortgage loans.balance sheet management strategy.
We are continually analyzing our AFS securities for potential sale opportunities. These analysesSecurities with unrealized gains and less than desirable yields may be sold for funding and profitability purposes. During 2016 and 2017, we identified several agency securities that made economic sensewere desirable to sellbe sold and recognized gains with these sales. We took this same approach in 2015, 2014, and 2013.2018 but did not identify sale opportunities. We anticipate taking this same approach in 2019.
In recent periods, we have invested considerable efforts to increase our market share in trustInvestment and brokerageTrust advisory services. Theseservices through marketing efforts have translated into increases in trust fees and brokerage and advisory fees.talent acquisition. We anticipate that these fees will continue to increase in 2016.2019 similar to the increase we experienced in 2018.
The increase in earningsIncome from our interest in Corporate Settlement Solutions, joint venture during 2015 can be attributed to their expansiona title insurance company, has increased as a result of national sales volume and maintaining consistent margins withstrong operating expense controls. Income for 2019 is expected to exceed 2018 levels.
In 2016, we recognized a $469 gain on the increased sales volume.redemption of a bank owned life insurance policy and had no similar redemptions in 2017 and 2018.
The fluctuations in all other income isare spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant.

25


Significant noninterest expense account balances are highlighted in the following table with additional descriptions of significant fluctuations for the years ended December 31:

    Change   Change
 2015 2014 $ % 2013 $ %
Compensation and benefits             
Employee salaries$13,760
 $13,311
 $449
 3.37 % $12,019
 $1,292
 10.75 %
Employee benefits5,308
 5,191
 117
 2.25 % 5,788
 (597) (10.31)%
Total compensation and benefits19,068
 18,502
 566
 3.06 % 17,807
 695
 3.90 %
Furniture and equipment             
Service contracts2,932
 2,542
 390
 15.34 % 2,277
 265
 11.64 %
Depreciation1,949
 1,850
 99
 5.35 % 1,889
 (39) (2.06)%
ATM and debit card fees742
 722
 20
 2.77 % 710
 12
 1.69 %
All other116
 59
 57
 96.61 % 69
 (10) (14.49)%
Total furniture and equipment5,739
 5,173
 566
 10.94 % 4,945
 228
 4.61 %
Occupancy             
Depreciation728
 701
 27
 3.85 % 667
 34
 5.10 %
Outside services701
 718
 (17) (2.37)% 671
 47
 7.00 %
Utilities528
 524
 4
 0.76 % 502
 22
 4.38 %
Property taxes526
 515
 11
 2.14 % 499
 16
 3.21 %
All other351
 340
 11
 3.24 % 314
 26
 8.28 %
Total occupancy2,834
 2,798
 36
 1.29 % 2,653
 145
 5.47 %
Other             
Director fees827
 775
 52
 6.71 % 819
 (44) (5.37)%
Audit and related fees821
 809
 12
 1.48 % 738
 71
 9.62 %
FDIC insurance premiums813
 842
 (29) (3.44)% 1,082
 (240) (22.18)%
Donations and community relations808
 1,004
 (196) (19.52)% 715
 289
 40.42 %
Marketing costs491
 427
 64
 14.99 % 416
 11
 2.64 %
Legal fees464
 320
 144
 45.00 % 359
 (39) (10.86)%
Education and travel442
 625
 (183) (29.28)%��502
 123
 24.50 %
Printing and supplies405
 367
 38
 10.35 % 396
 (29) (7.32)%
Postage and freight377
 397
 (20) (5.04)% 387
 10
 2.58 %
Consulting fees364
 349
 15
 4.30 % 315
 34
 10.79 %
Loan underwriting fees347
 361
 (14) (3.88)% 423
 (62) (14.66)%
State taxes218
 171
 47
 27.49 % 140
 31
 22.14 %
Amortization of deposit premium169
 183
 (14) (7.65)% 221
 (38) (17.19)%
Other losses150
 250
 (100) (40.00)% 109
 141
 129.36 %
Foreclosed asset and collection53
 122
 (69) (56.56)% 211
 (89) (42.18)%
All other1,661
 1,628
 33
 2.03 % 1,517
 111
 7.32 %
Total other8,410
 8,630
 (220) (2.55)% 8,350
 280
 3.35 %
Total noninterest expenses$36,051
 $35,103
 $948
 2.70 % $33,755
 $1,348
 3.99 %

    Change   Change
 2018 2017 $ % 2016 $ %
Compensation and benefits$22,609
 $21,525
 $1,084
 5.04 % $19,170
 $2,355
 12.28 %
Furniture and equipment6,182
 5,523
 659
 11.93 % 5,275
 248
 4.70 %
Occupancy3,263
 3,133
 130
 4.15 % 3,227
 (94) (2.91)%
Other             
Audit, consulting, and legal fees2,263
 2,043
 220
 10.77 % 1,952
 91
 4.66 %
ATM and debit card fees1,036
 1,181
 (145) (12.28)% 887
 294
 33.15 %
Loan underwriting fees1,016
 556
 460
 82.73 % 535
 21
 3.93 %
Director fees858
 856
 2
 0.23 % 851
 5
 0.59 %
FDIC insurance premiums726
 642
 84
 13.08 % 719
 (77) (10.71)%
Donations and community relations710
 657
 53
 8.07 % 582
 75
 12.89 %
Marketing costs596
 568
 28
 4.93 % 586
 (18) (3.07)%
OTTI on AFS securities
 
 
 N/M
 770
 (770) (100.00)%
All other3,558
 3,541
 17
 0.48 % 3,343
 198
 5.92 %
Total other10,763
 10,044
 719
 7.16 % 10,225
 (181) (1.77)%
Total noninterest expenses$42,817
 $40,225
 $2,592
 6.44 % $37,897
 $2,328
 6.14 %

26


Significant changes in noninterest expenses are detailed below:
Employee salaries have increasedCompensation and benefits in 2017 and 2018 exceeded 2016 levels as a result of normalnew positions required for growth within our markets, merit increases, increased service costs related to our defined benefit plan, and additional staffing required by our continued growth. The decline in employee benefits from 2013 to 2014, iscosts related to health care costscompliance requirements. In 2017, benefits expense was partially offset by a settlement with an insurance claim administrator in favor of Isabella Bank. Compensation and benefits expense in 2019 is expected to exceed 2018 levels as a result of lower than anticipated claims. Employee benefitsmerit increases.
Furniture and equipment expense consists primarily of depreciation, services contracts and computer expenses. Computer expense increased in 2018 due to data and system upgrades, additional network security costs, and one-time implementation costs. Expenses in 2019 are expected to increase moderatelyapproximate 2018 levels.
Audit, consulting, and legal fees increased in future periods2018 primarily as a result of anticipated increases in health care costs.
Service contracts include approximately $147 of conversionone-time charges related costs incurred asto income tax strategies. As a result, of two branch acquisitions during the third quarter of 2015.
FDIC insurance premiums were elevated in 2013 due to us receiving less of a refund for prepaid FDIC insurance premiums than we had anticipated. FDIC insurance premiums have returned to normalized levels and are anticipated to approximate current levels in 2016.
We have consistently been a strong supporter of the various communities, schools, and charities in the markets we serve. We sponsor a foundation, which we established in 1996, that is funded by discretionary donations. The foundation provides centralized oversight for charitable donations to organizations that benefit our communities. Included in donations and community relations were discretionary donations to the foundation of $258, $500, and $200 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Legal fees include approximately $133 of legal service expense incurred as a result of two branch acquisitions during the third quarter of 2015. Legal fees are expected to approximate 20142017 levels in 2016.2019.
We placedeveloped initiatives to increase ATM and debit card income in 2018 which resulted in increased ATM and debit card expenses. Expenses in 2017 included a strong emphasis on employee development through continuous education. Educationone-time early termination fee with a card provider. ATM and traveldebit card expenses vary from yearare expected to year based on the timing of various programs that our employees attend.approximate 2018 levels in 2019.
Other lossesLoan underwriting fees increased significantly in 2014 primarilyduring 2018 as a result of losses relatednew loan products, including first time home buyer and down payment assistance programs designed to fraudulent activities associated with debit cards. Also contributing to lossesgenerate residential mortgage growth. Expenses in 2014 were losses related to the repurchase of loans that we previously sold to a third party. While other losses fluctuate from period to period, they2019 are not expected to approximate 2015 levelsexceed 2018 levels.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we identified an AFS security that was impaired which resulted in 2016.
an OTTI loss of $770. No such similar OTTI loss occurred in 2017 or 2018.
The fluctuations in all other expenses are spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant.

27


Analysis of Changes in Financial Condition
The following table shows the composition and changes in our balance sheet as of December 31:
    Change    Change

2015 2014 $ %2018 2017 $ %
ASSETS              
Cash and cash equivalents$21,569
 $19,906
 $1,663
 8.35 %$73,471
 $30,848
 $42,623
 138.17 %
AFS securities              
Amortized cost of AFS securities654,348
 561,893
 92,455
 16.45 %501,245
 547,912
 (46,667) (8.52)%
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities5,788
 5,641
 147
 2.61 %(6,411) 818
 (7,229) N/M
AFS securities660,136
 567,534
 92,602
 16.32 %494,834
 548,730
 (53,896) (9.82)%
Equity securities, at fair value
 3,577
 (3,577) (100.00)%
Mortgage loans AFS1,187
 901
 286
 31.74 %358
 1,560
 (1,202) (77.05)%
Loans              
Gross loans850,492
 836,550
 13,942
 1.67 %1,128,707
 1,091,519
 37,188
 3.41 %
Less allowance for loan and lease losses7,400
 10,100
 (2,700) (26.73)%8,375
 7,700
 675
 8.77 %
Net loans843,092
 826,450
 16,642
 2.01 %1,120,332
 1,083,819
 36,513
 3.37 %
Premises and equipment28,331
 25,881
 2,450
 9.47 %27,815
 28,450
 (635) (2.23)%
Corporate owned life insurance policies26,423
 25,152
 1,271
 5.05 %27,733
 27,026
 707
 2.62 %
Accrued interest receivable6,269
 5,851
 418
 7.14 %6,928
 7,063
 (135) (1.91)%
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values22,286
 20,076
 2,210
 11.01 %24,948
 23,454
 1,494
 6.37 %
Goodwill and other intangible assets48,828
 46,128
 2,700
 5.85 %48,451
 48,547
 (96) (0.20)%
Other assets9,991
 11,664
 (1,673) (14.34)%12,437
 10,056
 2,381
 23.68 %
TOTAL ASSETS$1,668,112
 $1,549,543
 $118,569
 7.65 %$1,837,307
 $1,813,130
 $24,177
 1.33 %
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY              
Liabilities              
Deposits$1,164,563
 $1,074,484
 $90,079
 8.38 %$1,292,693
 $1,265,258
 $27,435
 2.17 %
Borrowed funds309,732
 289,709
 20,023
 6.91 %340,299
 344,878
 (4,579) (1.33)%
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities9,846
 10,756
 (910) (8.46)%8,796
 8,089
 707
 8.74 %
Total liabilities1,484,141
 1,374,949
 109,192
 7.94 %1,641,788
 1,618,225
 23,563
 1.46 %
Shareholders’ equity183,971
 174,594
 9,377
 5.37 %195,519
 194,905
 614
 0.32 %
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$1,668,112
 $1,549,543
 $118,569
 7.65 %$1,837,307
 $1,813,130
 $24,177
 1.33 %
As shown above, total assets have increased $118,569 since December 31, 2014. During 2015, we increased our cost basis$24,177 during 2018 which was primarily driven by loan growth of AFS securities by $92,455 while loans grew by $13,942. Included in the increase in our AFS securities portfolio was $147 increase in unrealized gains.$37,188. This balance sheet growth was funded by increasesthrough maturities and the receipt of principal payments in both deposits (through branch acquisitions) and borrowed funds.AFS securities as well as growth in deposits. While we do anticipate that generating quality loans will continue to be competitive, we expect that loans will continue to growchallenging as a result of competition, loan growth is expected in 2016.2019.
A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major categories follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Included in cash and cash equivalents are funds held with the FRB which fluctuate from period-to-period. Cash levels were elevated at December 31, 2018 as excess liquidity is expected to be used to pay off maturing long-term borrowings and other short-term liabilities during the first quarter of 2019.
AFS investment securities
The primary objective of our investing activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested. Secondary considerations include the need for earnings, liquidity, and our overall exposure to changes in interest rates. The current interest rate environment has made it almost impossibleflat yield curve encourages using excess liquidity to increase net interest income without increasing earning assets. As deposit growth outpaced loan demand in recent periods, we deployed funds from deposit growth into purchases ofreduce high-cost borrowings and therefore, AFS securities balances are not expected to provide additional interest income. We anticipate that future increases in our AFS securities will berise significantly in the form of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.near term.

28


The following is a schedule of the carrying value of AFS investment securities as of December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Government sponsored enterprises$24,345
 $24,136
 $23,745
 $25,776
 $397
$170
 $216
 $10,259
 $24,345
 $24,136
States and political subdivisions232,217
 215,345
 201,988
 182,743
 174,938
190,866
 208,474
 212,919
 232,217
 215,345
Auction rate money market preferred2,866
 2,619
 2,577
 2,778
 2,049
2,554
 3,049
 2,794
 2,866
 2,619
Preferred stocks3,299
 6,140
 5,827
 6,363
 5,033
Mortgage-backed securities263,384
 166,926
 144,115
 155,345
 143,602
184,484
 208,797
 227,256
 263,384
 166,926
Collateralized mortgage obligations134,025
 152,368
 133,810
 131,005
 99,101
116,760
 128,194
 101,443
 134,025
 152,368
Total$660,136
 $567,534
 $512,062
 $504,010
 $425,120
$494,834
 $548,730
 $554,671
 $656,837
 $561,394
Excluding those holdings in government sponsored enterprises and municipalities within the State of Michigan, there were no investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity. We have a policy prohibiting investments in securities that we deem are unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks. Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backedmortgage-backed securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backedasset-backed securities, and structured notes. Our holdings in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations include only government agencies and government sponsored agencies as we hold no investments in private label mortgage-backed securities or collateralized mortgage obligations.
The following is a schedule of maturities of AFS investment securities and their weighted average yieldyields as of December 31, 2015.2018. Weighted average yields have been computed on an FTE basis using a tax rate of 34%21%. Our auction rate money market preferred is a long terminvestments are long-term floating rate instrument for which the interest rate is set at periodic auctions. At each successful auction, we have the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally, theinstruments. The issuers of auction rate securities generally have the right to redeem or refinance the debt. Because of their lack of contractual maturities, auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks are not reported by a specific maturity group. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group due to their variable monthly payments. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Maturing    Maturing    
Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable  Monthly
Payments or
Noncontractual
Maturities
Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable  Monthly
Payments or
Noncontractual
Maturities
Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%)Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%)
Government sponsored enterprises$
  $23,963
 1.45 $382
 2.05 $
  $
 $
  $170
 2.06 $
  $
  $
 
States and political subdivisions30,217
 2.01 71,489
 4.75 96,489
 4.22 34,022
 4.91 
 23,189
 2.96 82,492
 3.46 56,842
 3.61 28,343
 4.04 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  
  
  
  263,384
 2.28
  
  
  
  184,484
 2.36
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  
  
  
  134,025
 2.35
  
  
  
  116,760
 2.44
Auction rate money market preferred
  
  
  
  2,866
 6.35
  
  
  
  2,554
 6.20
Preferred stocks
  
  
  
  3,299
 5.44
Total$30,217
 2.01 $95,452
 3.92 $96,871
 4.21 $34,022
 4.91 $403,574
 2.36$23,189
 2.96 $82,662
 3.46 $56,842
 3.61 $28,343
 4.04 $303,798
 2.42

29


Loans
Loans are the largest component of earning assets. The proper management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan portfolio is critical to our financial well-being. To control these risks, we have adopted strict underwriting standards. These standards which include specific criteria against lending outside our defined market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict loan to collateral value limits.limits, and a defined market area. We also monitor and limit loan concentrations to specific industries. We have no foreign loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category in the following table.

The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Commercial$448,381
 $433,270
 $393,164
 $372,332
 $366,440
$659,529
 $634,759
 $575,664
 $448,381
 $433,270
Agricultural115,911
 104,721
 92,589
 83,606
 74,645
127,161
 128,269
 126,492
 115,911
 104,721
Residential real estate251,501
 266,155
 291,499
 285,070
 278,803
275,343
 272,368
 266,050
 251,501
 266,155
Consumer34,699
 32,404
 33,525
 33,619
 31,722
66,674
 56,123
 42,409
 34,699
 32,404
Total$850,492
 $836,550
 $810,777
 $774,627
 $751,610
$1,128,707
 $1,091,519
 $1,010,615
 $850,492
 $836,550
The following table presents the change in the loan portfolio categories for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Commercial$15,111
 3.49 % $40,106
 10.20 % $20,832
 5.60 %$24,770
 3.90 % $59,095
 10.27% $127,283
 28.39%
Agricultural11,190
 10.69 % 12,132
 13.10 % 8,983
 10.74 %(1,108) (0.86)% 1,777
 1.40% 10,581
 9.13%
Residential real estate(14,654) (5.51)% (25,344) (8.69)% 6,429
 2.26 %2,975
 1.09 % 6,318
 2.37% 14,549
 5.78%
Consumer2,295
 7.08 % (1,121) (3.34)% (94) (0.28)%10,551
 18.80 % 13,714
 32.34% 7,710
 22.22%
Total$13,942
 1.67 % $25,773
 3.18 % $36,150
 4.67 %$37,188
 3.41 % $80,904
 8.01% $160,123
 18.83%
While competition for commercial loans continues to be strong, we experienced significant growth in this segment of the portfolio during 20152016 and anticipate strong2017 and had modest growth in 2016.2018. Growth in 2019 is expected to be consistent with growth during 2018. Despite a decline in agricultural loans, we expect modest change in the agricultural portfolio in 2019. Residential real estate and consumer loans declined during 2015; however, we anticipatealso experienced growth in 2016 as a result of initiatives designedover the last year and are both expected to increase both loan volume and the number of originations.in 2019.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost, and investments in unconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 2017Fair ValueFair Value” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).
Other assets
Other assets consist primarily of prepaid expenses, OMSR, and net deferred tax assets. For more information related to estimates and deferred taxes, refer to “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 15 – Federal Income Taxes” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Deposits
Deposits are our primary source of funding. The following table presents the composition of the deposit portfolio as of December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Noninterest bearing demand deposits$191,376
 $181,826
 $158,428
 $143,735
 $119,072
$236,534
 $237,511
 $205,071
 $191,376
 $181,826
Interest bearing demand deposits212,666
 190,984
 192,089
 181,259
 163,653
235,287
 231,666
 209,325
 212,666
 190,984
Savings deposits337,641
 261,412
 243,237
 228,338
 193,902
387,252
 342,815
 347,230
 337,641
 261,412
Certificates of deposit324,101
 339,824
 362,473
 376,790
 395,777
348,046
 331,718
 321,914
 324,101
 339,824
Brokered certificates of deposit73,815
 72,134
 56,329
 55,348
 54,326
72,229
 102,808
 88,632
 73,815
 72,134
Internet certificates of deposit24,964
 28,304
 31,210
 32,197
 31,434
13,345
 18,740
 22,868
 24,964
 28,304
Total$1,164,563
 $1,074,484
 $1,043,766
 $1,017,667
 $958,164
$1,292,693
 $1,265,258
 $1,195,040
 $1,164,563
 $1,074,484

30


The following table presents the change in the deposit categories for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change$ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change
Noninterest bearing demand deposits$9,550
 5.25 % $23,398
 14.77 % $14,693
 10.22 %$(977) (0.41)% $32,440
 15.82 % $13,695
 7.16 %
Interest bearing demand deposits21,682
 11.35 % (1,105) (0.58)% 10,830
 5.97 %3,621
 1.56 % 22,341
 10.67 % (3,341) (1.57)%
Savings deposits76,229
 29.16 % 18,175
 7.47 % 14,899
 6.52 %44,437
 12.96 % (4,415) (1.27)% 9,589
 2.84 %
Certificates of deposit(15,723) (4.63)% (22,649) (6.25)% (14,317) (3.80)%16,328
 4.92 % 9,804
 3.05 % (2,187) (0.67)%
Brokered certificates of deposit1,681
 2.33 % 15,805
 28.06 % 981
 1.77 %(30,579) (29.74)% 14,176
 15.99 % 14,817
 20.07 %
Internet certificates of deposit(3,340) (11.80)% (2,906) (9.31)% (987) (3.07)%(5,395) (28.79)% (4,128) (18.05)% (2,096) (8.40)%
Total$90,079
 8.38 % $30,718
 2.94 % $26,099
 2.56 %$27,435
 2.17 % $70,218
 5.88 % $30,477
 2.62 %
Deposit demand continues to be driven by non-contractual deposits, whilesuch as demand and savings deposits. We've also experienced growth in certificates of deposit gradually decline. Our significant growth in savings deposits during 2015 is the result of our recent branch acquisitions. In 2016, growth is anticipated to continue to come in the form of non-contractual deposits, whilepast two years. Brokered certificates of deposit are expected to continue to decline but at a slower rate than the past 5 years. We look to retainoffer another source of funding and attract new customers with the recent branch acquisitions to provide growthfluctuate from period-to-period based on our funding needs, including changes in deposits in future periods.

assets such as loans and investments.
The remaining maturity of time certificates and other time deposits of $100deposit of $250 or more as of December 31, 20152018 was as follows:
Maturity

Within 3 months$37,988
$24,668
Within 3 to 6 months17,377
6,088
Within 6 to 12 months50,180
17,679
Over 12 months133,183
27,493
Total$238,728
$75,928
Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds include FHLB advances, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.repurchase, and federal funds purchased. The balance of borrowed funds fluctuates from period to periodperiod-to-period based on our funding needs includingthat arise from changes in loans, investments, and deposits. To provide balance sheet growth, we utilize borrowings and brokered deposits to fund earning assets.
The following table presents borrowed funds balances for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013 2012 20112018 2017 2016 2015 2014
FHLB advances$235,000
 $192,000
 $162,000
 $152,000
 $142,242
$300,000
 $290,000
 $270,000
 $235,000
 $192,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates70,532
 95,070
 106,025
 66,147
 57,198
40,299
 54,878
 60,894
 70,532
 95,070
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates
 439
 11,301
 16,284
 16,696

 
 
 
 439
Federal funds purchased4,200
 2,200
 
 6,570
 

 
 6,800
 4,200
 2,200
Total$309,732
 $289,709
 $279,326
 $241,001
 $216,136
$340,299
 $344,878
 $337,694
 $309,732
 $289,709
For additional disclosure related to borrowed funds, see “Note 108Borrowed Funds” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
Included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities are obligations related to our defined benefit pension plan and obligations related to other employee benefits. For more information on the defined benefit pension plan and other employee benefits, see "Note 1712Benefit Plans"Plans” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

31


Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments
We have various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, which may require future cash payments. The following schedule summarizes our non-cancelablenon-cancellable obligations and future minimum payments as of December 31, 2015:2018:

Minimum Payments Due by PeriodMinimum Payments Due by Period
Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five Years
 TotalDue in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five Years
 Total
Deposits                  
Deposits with no stated maturity$741,683
 $
 $
 $
 $741,683
$859,073
 $
 $
 $
 $859,073
Certificates of deposit with stated maturities191,858
 153,099
 56,895
 21,028
 422,880
232,349
 121,087
 73,216
 6,968
 433,620
Total deposits933,541
 153,099
 56,895
 21,028
 1,164,563
1,091,422
 121,087
 73,216
 6,968
 1,292,693
Borrowed funds                  
Short-term borrowings74,732
 
 
 
 74,732
40,299
 
 
 
 40,299
Long-term borrowings45,000
 100,000
 20,000
 70,000
 235,000
100,000
 115,000
 55,000
 30,000
 300,000
Total borrowed funds119,732
 100,000
 20,000
 70,000
 309,732
140,299
 115,000
 55,000
 30,000
 340,299
Total contractual obligations$1,053,273
 $253,099
 $76,895
 $91,028
 $1,474,295
$1,231,721
 $236,087
 $128,216
 $36,968
 $1,632,992
We also have loan commitments that may impact liquidity. The following schedule summarizes our loan commitments and expiration dates by period as of December 31, 2015.2018. Commitments to grant loans include residential mortgage loans with the majority being loans committed to be sold to the secondary market. Since many of these commitments historically have expired without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent our future cash requirements.

Expiration Dates by PeriodExpiration Dates by Period
Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five
Years
 TotalDue in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Three Years
 After Three
Years But
Within
Five Years
 After
Five
Years
 Total
Unused commitments under lines of credit$69,954
 $35,488
 $19,513
 $9,457
 $134,412
$95,540
 $70,701
 $24,362
 $9,049
 $199,652
Commercial and standby letters of credit1,723
 
 
 
 1,723
Commitments to grant loans53,946
 
 
 
 53,946
13,225
 
 
 
 13,225
Commercial and standby letters of credit915
 
 
 
 915
Total loan commitments$124,815
 $35,488
 $19,513
 $9,457
 $189,273
$110,488
 $70,701
 $24,362
 $9,049
 $214,600
For additional disclosure related to Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments, see “Note 139Off-Balance-Sheet Activities, Commitments and Other MattersOff-Balance-Sheet Activities” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Capital
Capital consists solely of common stock, retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We are authorized to raise capital through dividend reinvestment, employee and director stock purchases, and shareholder stock purchases. Pursuant to these authorizations, we issued 216,700261,693 shares or $5,2016,864 of common stock during 20152018, and 182,755220,510 shares or $4,2276,177 of common stock in 20142017. We also offer the Directors Plan in which participants either directly purchase stock or purchase stock units through deferred fees, in lieu of cash payments. Pursuant to this plan, we increased shareholders’ equity by $550612 and $495640 during 20152018 and 20142017, respectively.
We have a publicly announced common stock repurchase plan. Pursuant to this plan, we repurchased 193,107248,017 shares or $4,5907,007 of common stock compared toduring 2018 and 135,630184,286 shares or $3,1225,181 during 20152017 and 2014, respectively.. As of December 31, 20152018, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional 158,658167,654 shares of common stock.
The FRB has established minimum risk basedrisk-based capital guidelines. Pursuant to these guidelines, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The final rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and

32


off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushionconservation buffer. The rules, which are being gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically.

There are no significant regulatory constraints placed on our capital. The FRB’s current recommended minimum primary capital to adjusted assets ratio requirement is 6.00%. Our primary capital to adjusted average assets, or tier 1 leverage ratio, was 8.52%8.72% as of December 31, 20152018.
Effective January 1, 2015, the minimum standard for primary, or tierTier 1, capital increased from 4.00% to 6.00%. The minimum standard for total capital remains atis 8.00%. Also effective January 1, 2015 iswas the new common equity tier 1 capital ratio which hashad a minimum requirement of 4.50%. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the capital conservation buffer went into effect which further increased the required levels. The following table sets forth the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines and our valuesratios as of December 31:
2018 2017

2015 2014 RequiredActual Minimum Required Actual Minimum Required
Common equity tier 1 capital13.24% N/A
 4.50%12.58% 6.375% 12.23% 5.750%
     
Tier 1 capital13.24% 14.08% 6.00%12.58% 7.875% 12.23% 7.250%
Tier 2 capital0.72% 1.11% 2.00%
Total Capital13.96% 15.19% 8.00%13.26% 9.875% 12.86% 9.250%
Tier 2 capital, or secondary capital, includes only the ALLL. The percentage for the secondary capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed from all sources.
The FRB and FDIC also prescribe minimum capital requirements for Isabella Bank. At December 31, 20152018, the Bank exceeded these minimum capital requirements. For further information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements, see “Note 1610Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements”Requirements of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Fair Value
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. AFS securities and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time-to-time,time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans AFS, impaired loans, goodwill, foreclosed assets, OMSR, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downswrite downs of individual assets.
For further information regarding fair value measurements, see “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 2017Fair ValueFair Value” of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change in interest rates. We strive to achieve reasonable stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. One tool we use to measure interest rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following table, the gap analysis depicts our position for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets.
Fixed interest rate AFS securities are scheduled according to their contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization. Variable rate loans, which totaled $168,534 as of December 31, 2015, are included in the time frame of their earliest repricing. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate time deposits in the amount of $1,601 that are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.
Savings and NOW accounts have no contractual maturity date and are believed by us to be predominantly noninterest rate sensitive. These accounts have been classified in the gap table according to their estimated withdrawal rates based upon our analysis of deposit decay over the past five years. We believe this decay experience is consistent with our expectation for the future. As of December 31, 2015, we had a positive cumulative gap within one year. A positive gap position results when more assets, within a specified time frame, have the potential to mature or reprice than liabilities.

33


The following table shows the time periods and the amount of assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as of December 31, 2015. The interest rate sensitivity information for investment securities is based on the expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the ALLL are excluded.

0 to 3
Months
 4 to 12
Months
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
Interest sensitive assets       
AFS securities$35,776
 $112,916
 $347,042
 $164,402
Loans204,408
 79,477
 409,031
 156,784
Total$240,184
 $192,393
 $756,073
 $321,186
Interest sensitive liabilities       
Borrowed funds$99,732
 $20,000
 $150,000
 $40,000
Time deposits60,100
 132,001
 209,751
 21,028
Savings42,141
 26,360
 103,694
 165,446
NOW2,936
 8,805
 40,641
 160,284
Total$204,909
 $187,166
 $504,086
 $386,758
Cumulative gap$35,275
 $40,502
 $292,489
 $226,917
Cumulative gap as a % of assets2.11% 2.43% 17.53% 13.60%
The following table shows the maturity of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2015. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

1 Year
or Less
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
 Total
Commercial and agricultural$78,188
 $310,530
 $175,574
 $564,292
Interest sensitivity       
Loans maturing after one year that have:       
Fixed interest rates  $275,064
 $168,591
  
Variable interest rates  35,466
 6,983
  
Total  $310,530
 $175,574
  

34


Liquidity
Liquidity is monitored regularly by our Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key ratios, and liquidity available from both primary and secondary sources.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents and unencumbered AFS securities. These categories totaled $681,705$256,583 or 40.87%13.97% of assets as of December 31, 20152018 as compared to $587,440$296,765 or 37.91%16.37% as of December 31, 20142017. The decrease in primary liquidity is a direct result of our unencumbered AFS securities' maturity and principal payment activity during 2018. Liquidity is important for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requests, and various other commitments including expansion of operations, investment opportunities, and payment of cash dividends. Liquidity variescould vary significantly daily, based on customer activity.
Our primary source of funds is deposit accounts. We also haveOur secondary sources include the ability to borrow from the FHLB, from the FRB, and through various correspondent banks in the form of federal funds purchased and a line of credit. These funding methods typically carry a higher interest rate than traditional market deposit accounts. Some borrowed funds, including FHLB advances, FRB Discount Window advances, and repurchase agreements, require us to pledge assets, typically in the form of AFS securities or loans as collateral. As of December 31, 20152018, we had available lines of credit of $121,960150,162.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the years ended December 31:
2015 2014 $ Variance2018 2017 $ Variance
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$12,090
 $17,562
 $(5,472)$22,010
 $19,721
 $2,289
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(113,499) (74,826) (38,673)6,470
 (81,755) 88,225
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities103,072
 35,032
 68,040
14,143
 69,988
 (55,845)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,663
 (22,232) 23,895
42,623
 7,954
 34,669
Cash and cash equivalents January 119,906
 42,138
 (22,232)30,848
 22,894
 7,954
Cash and cash equivalents December 31$21,569
 $19,906
 $1,663
$73,471
 $30,848
 $42,623
Market Risk
Our primary market risks are interest rate risk and liquidity risk. We have no significant foreign exchange risk and do not utilize interest rate swaps or derivatives, except for interest rate locks and forward loan commitments, in the management of IRR. Any changes in foreign exchange rates or commodity prices would not have a significant impact on our interest income and cash flows.
IRR is the exposure of our net interest income to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution's interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method by which financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value. Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to our earnings and capital.
The FRB has adopted a policy requiring us to effectively manage the various risks that can have a material impact on our safety and soundness. The risks include credit, interest rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. We have policies, procedures, and internal controls for measuring and managing these risks. Specifically, our Funds Management policy and procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits on investments in long termlong-term assets, limiting the mismatch in repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the frequency of measuring and reporting to our Board.
The primary technique to measure IRR is simulation analysis. Simulation analysis forecasts the effects on the balance sheet structure and net interest income under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in interest rates, the shape of yield curves, interest rate relationships, loan prepayments, and changes in funding sources. These forecasts are compared against net interest income projected in a stable interest rate environment. While many assets and liabilities reprice either at maturity or in accordance with their contractual terms, several balance sheet components demonstrate characteristics that require an evaluation to more accurately reflect their repricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation analysis include prepayments on loans, probable calls of investment securities, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and loan pricing, deposit sensitivity, and customer preferences. These assumptions are inherently uncertain as they are subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment. As a result, the simulation analysis cannot precisely forecast the impact of rising and falling interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to many other factors, including changes in balance sheet components, interest rate changes, changes in market conditions, and management strategies.

35


Our interest rate sensitivity is estimated by first forecasting the next 12 and 24 months of net interest income under an assumed environment of a constant balance sheet and constant market interest rates (base case). We then compare the results of various simulation analyses to the base case. At December 31, 2015,2018, we projected the change in net interest income during the next 12 and 24 months assuming market interest rates were to immediately decrease by 100 and 200 basis points and increase by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve during the same time period. We did not project scenarios showing decreases in interest rates beyond 100 basis points as this is considered extremely unlikely given current interest rate levels. These projections

were based on our assets and liabilities remaining static over the next 12 and 24 months, while factoring in probable calls and prepayments of certain investment securities and residential real estate residential and consumer loans. While it is extremely unlikely that interest rates would immediately increasechange to these levels, we feel that these extreme scenarios help us identify potential gaps and mismatches in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. We regularly monitor our projected net interest income sensitivity to ensure that it remains within established limits. As of December 31, 2018, our interest rate sensitivity results were within Board approved limits.
The following tables summarize our interest rate sensitivity for 12 and 24 months as of:
December 31, 2015December 31, 2018
12 Months 24 Months12 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)-100 +100 +200 +300 +400 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400-200 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(2.08)% 1.27% 2.00% 2.11% 2.23% (1.77)% 2.00% 3.47% 4.02% 4.39%(4.90)% (2.85)% 1.06% 2.67% 5.15% 6.22%
           
24 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)-200 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(6.76)% (4.04)% 1.83% 3.82% 6.53% 6.54%
December 31, 2014December 31, 2017
12 Months 24 Months12 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)-100 +100 +200 +300 +400 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400-200 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(1.66)% 0.29% 0.45% (3.18)% (4.39)% (1.83)% 0.25% 1.04% (2.70)% (3.98)%(5.57)% (2.43)% 2.36% 4.18% 5.99% 7.94%
           
24 Months
Immediate basis point change assumption (short-term)-200 -100 +100 +200 +300 +400
Percent change in net interest income vs. constant rates(5.10)% (2.29)% 2.61% 4.17% 5.39% 6.09%
Gap analysis, the secondary method to measure IRR, measures the cash flows and/or the earliest repricing of our interest bearing assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet. Significant assumptions are required in this process because of the embedded repricing options contained in assets and liabilities. Residential real estate and consumer loans allow the borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty, while commercial and agricultural loans may have prepayment penalties. The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors, including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the current offering rates, the level of sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will result in an increase in cash flows from these assets. A significant portion of our securities are callable or have prepayment options. The call and prepayment options are more likely to be exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Savings and demand accounts may generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical experience. Certificates of deposit have penalties that discourage early withdrawals.

36


The following tables provide information about assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 20152018 and December 31, 20142017. The principal amounts of investments, loans, other interest earning assets, borrowings, and time deposits maturing were calculated based on the contractual maturity dates. Estimated cash flows for savings and NOW accounts are based on our estimated deposit decay rates.

December 31, 2015December 31, 2018
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total Fair Value2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets                              
Other interest bearing assets$2,659
 $100
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $2,759
 $2,758
$49,837
 $100
 $
 $��
 $
 $
 $49,937
 $49,937
Average interest rates0.23% 0.35% 
 
 
 
 0.24%  1.85% 1.72% % % % % 1.85%  
AFS securities$148,692
 $120,692
 $81,726
 $73,541
 $71,083
 $164,402
 $660,136
 $660,136
$84,691
 $77,165
 $70,081
 $70,033
 $59,541
 $133,323
 $494,834
 $494,834
Average interest rates2.49% 2.62% 2.60% 2.43% 2.52% 2.75% 2.59%  
Equity securities$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Average interest rates2.16% 2.11% 2.18% 2.25% 2.37% 2.43% 2.25%  $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
  
Fixed interest rate loans (1)$116,143
 $130,873
 $103,265
 $83,457
 $91,436
 $156,784
 $681,958
 $670,864
$152,336
 $118,585
 $142,107
 $113,587
 $119,069
 $188,082
 $833,766
 $792,394
Average interest rates4.56% 4.42% 4.27% 4.36% 4.18% 4.28% 4.35%  4.44% 4.37% 4.34% 4.46% 4.49% 4.23% 4.38%  
Variable interest rate loans (1)$61,672
 $24,289
 $24,359
 $14,398
 $16,842
 $26,974
 $168,534
 $168,534
$70,336
 $30,855
 $42,968
 $22,766
 $18,685
 $109,331
 $294,941
 $287,196
Average interest rates4.08% 4.12% 4.19% 3.45% 3.40% 3.69% 3.92%  6.14% 5.75% 5.76% 5.22% 5.01% 4.16% 5.16%  
Rate sensitive liabilities                              
Fixed rate borrowed funds$104,732
 $50,000
 $50,000
 $40,000
 $10,000
 $40,000
 $294,732
 $297,495
$140,299
 $55,000
 $50,000
 $20,000
 $35,000
 $30,000
 $330,299
 $323,903
Average interest rates0.47% 1.56% 2.16% 2.35% 1.98% 2.67% 1.55%  1.41% 2.18% 1.91% 1.97% 3.17% 2.36% 1.92%  
Variable rate borrowed funds$15,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $15,000
 $15,000
$
 $
 $10,000
 $
 $
 $
 $10,000
 $9,926
Average interest rates0.62% 
 
 
 
 
 0.62%  % % 2.62% % % % 2.62%  
Savings and NOW accounts$80,242
 $42,064
 $37,773
 $33,950
 $30,548
 $325,730
 $550,307
 $550,307
$55,248
 $49,944
 $44,783
 $40,191
 $36,105
 $396,268
 $622,539
 $622,539
Average interest rates0.59% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.18%  0.52% 0.51% 0.50% 0.50% 0.49% 0.44% 0.46%  
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit$190,500
 $89,689
 $63,167
 $23,883
 $33,012
 $21,028
 $421,279
 $419,828
$227,451
 $54,051
 $65,036
 $41,502
 $31,714
 $6,968
 $426,722
 $419,116
Average interest rates0.92% 1.26% 1.27% 1.50% 1.59% 1.84% 1.18%  1.63% 1.90% 2.09% 1.99% 2.23% 2.14% 1.82%  
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit$1,358
 $243
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,601
 $1,601
$4,898
 $2,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $6,898
 $6,877
Average interest rates0.49% 0.40% 
 
 
 
 0.48%  2.32% 2.61% % % % % 2.40%  

December 31, 2014December 31, 2017
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total Fair Value2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total Fair Value
Rate sensitive assets                              
Other interest bearing assets$1,748
 $
 $100
 $
 $
 $
 $1,848
 $1,847
$5,481
 $
 $100
 $
 $
 $
 $5,581
 $5,581
Average interest rates0.36% 
 0.35% 
 
 
 0.36%  1.65% % 0.35% % % % 1.63%  
AFS securities$109,261
 $93,324
 $80,147
 $53,017
 $47,112
 $184,673
 $567,534
 $567,534
$95,000
 $72,551
 $71,591
 $68,127
 $60,607
 $180,854
 $548,730
 $548,730
Average interest rates2.22% 2.26% 2.32% 2.39% 2.46% 2.62% 2.41%  2.33% 2.46% 2.59% 2.58% 2.38% 2.56% 2.49%  
Equity securities$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $3,577
 $3,577
 $3,577
Average interest rates% % % % % 4.00% 4.00%  
Fixed interest rate loans (1)$121,996
 $98,865
 $128,954
 $91,854
 $71,293
 $151,156
 $664,118
 $657,985
$153,100
 $118,068
 $114,872
 $129,992
 $116,779
 $222,971
 $855,782
 $825,855
Average interest rates4.78% 4.83% 4.53% 4.32% 4.47% 4.25% 4.52%  4.12% 4.34% 4.24% 4.16% 4.34% 4.01% 4.17%  
Variable interest rate loans (1)$71,435
 $26,938
 $19,836
 $13,929
 $14,706
 $25,588
 $172,432
 $172,432
$70,738
 $35,473
 $27,164
 $25,494
 $20,158
 $56,710
 $235,737
 $231,051
Average interest rates4.46% 3.97% 3.95% 3.39% 3.37% 4.01% 4.08%  5.48% 4.79% 4.91% 4.43% 4.39% 3.72% 4.68%  
Rate sensitive liabilities                              
Fixed rate borrowed funds$139,709
 $10,000
 $30,000
 $40,000
 $20,000
 $50,000
 $289,709
 $293,401
$124,878
 $85,000
 $35,000
 $50,000
 $20,000
 $20,000
 $334,878
 $332,146
Average interest rates0.33% 2.15% 1.95% 2.35% 3.11% 2.53% 1.41%  1.15% 1.87% 1.80% 1.91% 1.97% 2.54% 1.65%  
Variable rate borrowed funds$
 $
 $
 $10,000
 $
 $
 $10,000
 $9,943
Average interest rates% % % 1.72% % % 1.72%  
Savings and NOW accounts$40,395
 $36,417
 $32,717
 $29,423
 $26,487
 $286,957
 $452,396
 $452,396
$49,140
 $44,096
 $39,607
 $35,611
 $32,051
 $373,976
 $574,481
 $574,481
Average interest rates0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.10% 0.11%  0.22% 0.22% 0.22% 0.22% 0.21% 0.27% 0.25%  
Fixed interest rate certificates of deposit$216,852
 $74,722
 $56,391
 $50,550
 $22,901
 $17,723
 $439,139
 $439,841
$188,598
 $109,047
 $37,604
 $50,814
 $38,843
 $21,840
 $446,746
 $437,400
Average interest rates0.96% 1.66% 1.47% 1.31% 1.48% 1.77% 1.25%  1.05% 1.57% 1.62% 1.76% 1.85% 2.05% 1.42%  
Variable interest rate certificates of deposit$653
 $470
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,123
 $1,123
$2,414
 $4,106
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $6,520
 $6,492
Average interest rates0.40% 0.40% 
 
 
 
 0.40%  1.40% 1.66% % % % % 1.56%  
 (1) The fair value reported is exclusive of the allocation of the ALLL.

We do not believe that there has been a material change in the nature or categories of our primary market risk exposure, or the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss. As of the date of this report, weWe do not know of or expect there to be any material change in the general nature of our primary market risk exposure in the near term. As of the date of this report, weWe do not expect to make material changes in thoseto our market risk methods in the near term. We may change those methods in the future to adapt to changes in circumstances or to implement new techniques.

37Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change in interest rates. We strive to achieve reasonable stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. One tool we use to measure interest rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following table, the gap analysis depicts our position for specific time periods and the cumulative repricing gap as a percentage of total assets.
The interest rate sensitivity information for AFS securities is based on the expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. Fixed rate loans are included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization. Variable rate loans, which totaled $294,941 as of December 31, 2018, are included in the time frame of their earliest repricing. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate time deposits in the amount of $6,898 that are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.
The following table shows the time periods and the amount of assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as of December 31, 2018. For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the ALLL are excluded.


0 to 3
Months
 4 to 12
Months
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
Interest sensitive assets       
AFS securities$16,844
 $67,847
 $276,820
 $133,323
Loans342,087
 97,930
 493,348
 188,082
Total$358,931
 $165,777
 $770,168
 $321,405
Interest sensitive liabilities       
Borrowed funds$95,299
 $45,000
 $170,000
 $30,000
Time deposits85,979
 148,370
 192,303
 6,968
Savings387,252
 
 
 
NOW235,287
 
 
 
Total$803,817
 $193,370
 $362,303
 $36,968
Cumulative repricing gap$(444,886) $(472,479) $(64,614) $219,823
Cumulative repricing gap as a % of assets(24.21)% (25.72)% (3.52)% 11.96%
TableThe following table shows the maturity of Contentscommercial and agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2018. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

1 Year
or Less
 1 to 5
Years
 Over 5
Years
 Total
Commercial and agricultural$117,472
 $447,279
 $221,939
 $786,690
Interest sensitivity       
Loans maturing after one year that have:       
Fixed interest rates  $381,791
 $186,836
  
Variable interest rates  65,488
 35,103
  
Total  $447,279
 $221,939
  

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The information presented in the section captioned “Market Risk” in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The following consolidated financial statements accompanied by the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are set forth beginning on the following page 40 of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Supplementary data regarding quarterly results of operations is included in Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Restatements:Data Certain amounts previously reported in the 2014 and 2013 consolidated financial statements have been restated. For a complete overview on restatements impacting the consolidated financial statements and the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, see the “Restatements” section of “Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

38


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Isabella Bank Corporation
Mount Pleasant, Michigan
Opinion on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and the related consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). We also have audited Isabella Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion Isabella Bank Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.
Basis for Opinions
Isabella Bank Corporation’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the effectiveness of Isabella Bank Corporation’ss consolidated financial statements and on Isabella Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to Isabella Bank Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion Isabella Bank Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.



/s/Rehmann Robson LLC

We have served as Isabella Bank Corporation's independent auditor since 1996.
Saginaw, Michigan
March 9, 201613, 2019


39


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)

December 31December 31
2015 20142018 2017
ASSETS      
Cash and cash equivalents      
Cash and demand deposits due from banks$18,810
 $18,058
$23,534
 $25,267
Interest bearing balances due from banks2,759
 1,848
49,937
 5,581
Total cash and cash equivalents21,569
 19,906
73,471
 30,848
AFS securities (amortized cost of $654,348 in 2015 and $561,893 in 2014)660,136
 567,534
AFS securities, at fair value494,834
 548,730
Equity securities, at fair value
 3,577
Mortgage loans AFS1,187
 901
358
 1,560
Loans      
Commercial448,381
 433,270
659,529
 634,759
Agricultural115,911
 104,721
127,161
 128,269
Residential real estate251,501
 266,155
275,343
 272,368
Consumer34,699
 32,404
66,674
 56,123
Gross loans850,492
 836,550
1,128,707
 1,091,519
Less allowance for loan and lease losses7,400
 10,100
8,375
 7,700
Net loans843,092
 826,450
1,120,332
 1,083,819
Premises and equipment28,331
 25,881
27,815
 28,450
Corporate owned life insurance policies26,423
 25,152
27,733
 27,026
Accrued interest receivable6,269
 5,851
6,928
 7,063
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values22,286
 20,076
24,948
 23,454
Goodwill and other intangible assets48,828
 46,128
48,451
 48,547
Other assets9,991
 11,664
12,437
 10,056
TOTAL ASSETS$1,668,112
 $1,549,543
$1,837,307
 $1,813,130
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Deposits      
Noninterest bearing$191,376
 $181,826
$236,534
 $237,511
NOW accounts212,666
 190,984
235,287
 231,666
Certificates of deposit under $100 and other savings521,793
 456,774
Certificates of deposit over $100238,728
 244,900
Certificates of deposit under $250 and other savings744,944
 728,090
Certificates of deposit over $25075,928
 67,991
Total deposits1,164,563
 1,074,484
1,292,693
 1,265,258
Borrowed funds309,732
 289,709
340,299
 344,878
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities9,846
 10,756
8,796
 8,089
Total liabilities1,484,141
 1,374,949
1,641,788
 1,618,225
Shareholders’ equity      
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,799,867 shares (including 19,401 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2015 and 7,776,274 shares (including 13,934 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2014139,198
 138,755
Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,870,969 shares (including 16,673 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2018 and 7,857,293 shares (including 31,769 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2017140,416
 140,277
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations4,592
 4,242
5,431
 5,502
Retained earnings39,960
 32,103
57,357
 51,728
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)221
 (506)(7,685) (2,602)
Total shareholders’ equity183,971
 174,594
195,519
 194,905
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$1,668,112
 $1,549,543
$1,837,307
 $1,813,130




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

40


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
Common Stock        Common Stock        

Common Shares
Outstanding
 Amount Common Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 TotalsCommon Shares
Outstanding
 Amount Common Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Totals
Balance, January 1, 20137,671,846
 $136,580
 $3,734
 $19,168
 $5,007
 $164,489
Balance, January 1, 20167,799,867
 $139,198
 $4,592
 $39,960
 $221
 $183,971
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 12,510
 (11,348) 1,162

 
 
 13,799
 (2,999) 10,800
Issuance of common stock149,191
 3,618
 
 
 
 3,618
179,903
 5,023
 
 
 
 5,023
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 140
 (140) 
 
 

 127
 (127) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 554
 
 
 554

 
 573
 
 
 573
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (383) 
 
 
 (383)
 (383) 
 
 
 (383)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(98,014) (2,375) 
 
 
 (2,375)(158,701) (4,440) 
 
 
 (4,440)
Cash dividends paid ($0.84 per common share)
 
 
 (6,456) 
 (6,456)
Balance, December 31, 20137,723,023
 137,580
 4,148
 25,222
 (6,341) 160,609
Cash dividends paid ($0.98 per common share)
 
 
 (7,645) 
 (7,645)
Balance, December 31, 20167,821,069
 139,525
 5,038
 46,114
 (2,778) 187,899
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 13,724
 5,835
 19,559

 
 
 13,237
 543
 13,780
Reclassification resulting from the enactment of the Tax Act
 
 
 367
 (367) 
Issuance of common stock182,755
 4,227
 
 
 
 4,227
220,510
 6,177
 
 
 
 6,177
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations6,126
 143
 (143) 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 258
 (258) 
 
 

 176
 (176) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 495
 
 
 495

 
 640
 
 
 640
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (331) 
 
 
 (331)
 (420) 
 
 
 (420)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(135,630) (3,122) 
 
 
 (3,122)(184,286) (5,181) 
 
 
 (5,181)
Cash dividends paid ($0.89 per common share)
 
 
 (6,843) 
 (6,843)
Balance, December 31, 20147,776,274
 138,755
 4,242
 32,103
 (506) 174,594
Cash dividends paid ($1.02 per common share)
 
 
 (7,990) 
 (7,990)
Balance, December 31, 20177,857,293
 140,277
 5,502
 51,728
 (2,602) 194,905
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 15,130
 727
 15,857

 
 
 14,021
 (5,306) 8,715
Adoption of ASU 2016-01
 
 
 (223) 223
 
Issuance of common stock216,700
 5,201
 
 
 
 5,201
261,693
 6,864
 
 
 
 6,864
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Common stock transferred from the Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations
 200
 (200) 
 
 

 683
 (683) 
 
 
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
 
 550
 
 
 550

 
 612
 
 
 612
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
 (368) 
 
 
 (368)
 (401) 
 
 
 (401)
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan(193,107) (4,590) 
 
 
 (4,590)(248,017) (7,007) 
 
 
 (7,007)
Cash dividends paid ($0.94 per common share)
 
 
 (7,273) 
 (7,273)
Balance, December 31, 20157,799,867
 $139,198
 $4,592
 $39,960
 $221
 $183,971
Cash dividends paid ($1.04 per common share)
 
 
 (8,169) 
 (8,169)
Balance, December 31, 20187,870,969
 $140,416
 $5,431
 $57,357
 $(7,685) $195,519
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

41


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Interest income          
Loans, including fees$35,853
 $36,629
 $37,575
$49,229
 $43,537
 $38,537
AFS securities          
Taxable9,053
 8,092
 7,228
8,239
 8,410
 8,591
Nontaxable5,996
 5,911
 5,132
5,279
 5,570
 5,715
Federal funds sold and other600
 516
 483
1,117
 896
 823
Total interest income51,502
 51,148
 50,418
63,864
 58,413
 53,666
Interest expense          
Deposits5,850
 6,295
 7,140
9,261
 6,809
 5,836
Borrowings4,313
 3,675
 3,881
6,370
 5,685
 5,029
Total interest expense10,163
 9,970
 11,021
15,631
 12,494
 10,865
Net interest income41,339
 41,178
 39,397
48,233
 45,919
 42,801
Provision for loan losses(2,771) (668) 1,111
978
 253
 (135)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses44,110
 41,846
 38,286
47,255
 45,666
 42,936
Noninterest income          
Service charges and fees5,437
 5,411
 5,682
6,210
 6,013
 5,230
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies707
 726
 761
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans573
 514
 962
525
 647
 651
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies771
 751
 732
Net gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities163
 97
 171
Net gains on sale of AFS securities
 142
 245
Other3,415
 2,552
 2,628
3,504
 3,284
 4,221
Total noninterest income10,359
 9,325
 10,175
10,946
 10,812
 11,108
Noninterest expenses          
Compensation and benefits19,068
 18,502
 17,807
22,609
 21,525
 19,170
Furniture and equipment5,739
 5,173
 4,945
6,182
 5,523
 5,275
Occupancy2,834
 2,798
 2,653
3,263
 3,133
 3,227
Other8,410
 8,630
 8,350
10,763
 10,044
 10,225
Total noninterest expenses36,051
 35,103
 33,755
42,817
 40,225
 37,897
Income before federal income tax expense18,418
 16,068
 14,706
15,384
 16,253
 16,147
Federal income tax expense3,288
 2,344
 2,196
1,363
 3,016
 2,348
NET INCOME$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
Earnings per common share          
Basic$1.95
 $1.77
 $1.63
$1.78
 $1.69
 $1.77
Diluted$1.90
 $1.74
 $1.59
$1.74
 $1.65
 $1.73
Cash dividends per common share$0.94
 $0.89
 $0.84
$1.04
 $1.02
 $0.98













The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

42


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Net income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities          
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year310
 11,290
 (18,971)
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period(7,229) 289
 (5,865)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income(163) (97) (171)
 (142) (245)
Net unrealized gains (losses)147
 11,193
 (19,142)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
 
 770
Comprehensive income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit(7,229) 147
 (5,340)
Tax effect (1)87
 (3,684) 6,257
1,415
 89
 1,834
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax234
 7,509
 (12,885)
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities, net of tax(5,814) 236
 (3,506)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments     
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments arising during the period33
 43
 248
Tax effect (1)
(7) (15) (84)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax26
 28
 164
Change in unrecognized pension cost on defined benefit pension plan          
Change in unrecognized pension cost arising during the year255
 (2,836) 2,120
Change in unrecognized pension cost arising during the period265
 11
 282
Reclassification adjustment for net periodic benefit cost included in net income492
 300
 208
345
 412
 238
Net change in unrecognized pension cost747
 (2,536) 2,328
610
 423
 520
Tax effect(254) 862
 (791)
Tax effect (1)
(128) (144) (177)
Change in unrealized pension cost, net of tax493
 (1,674) 1,537
482
 279
 343
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax727
 5,835
 (11,348)(5,306) 543
 (2,999)
Comprehensive income (loss)$15,857
 $19,559
 $1,162
$8,715
 $13,780
 $10,800
(1) 
See “Note 1816Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)” in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for tax effect reconciliation.






























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

43


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES          
Net income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values(144) 40
 791
Provision for loan losses(2,771) (668) 1,111
978
 253
 (135)
Impairment of foreclosed assets99
 123
 156

 2
 10
Depreciation2,677
 2,551
 2,556
2,940
 2,902
 2,821
Amortization of OMSR340
 265
 522
218
 340
 394
Amortization of acquisition intangibles169
 183
 221
96
 119
 162
Net amortization of AFS securities2,074
 1,830
 2,028
1,873
 2,144
 2,747
AFS security impairment loss
 
 770
Net unrealized (gains) losses on equity securities, at fair value41
 
 
Net (gains) losses on sale of AFS securities(163) (97) (171)
 (142) (245)
Net (gains) losses on sale of equity securities, at fair value(1) 
 
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans(573) (514) (962)(525) (647) (651)
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies(771) (751) (732)(707) (726) (761)
Gains from redemption of corporate owned life insurance policies
 
 (469)
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan550
 495
 554
612
 640
 573
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense1,692
 207
 (1,208)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)275
 2,836
 (282)
Origination of loans held-for-sale(42,887) (28,135) (53,632)(29,242) (36,276) (33,089)
Proceeds from loan sales43,174
 28,852
 57,123
30,969
 37,179
 33,111
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:          
Accrued interest receivable(418) (409) (215)135
 (483) (311)
Other assets(5,322) (1,392) 1,792
113
 800
 455
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities(910) 1,298
 1,954
358
 (2,497) 550
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities12,090
 17,562
 23,607
22,010
 19,721
 20,240
INVESTING ACTIVITIES          
Activity in AFS securities          
Sales1,319
 13,362
 16,229

 12,827
 35,664
Maturities, calls, and principal payments90,036
 68,188
 86,225
80,005
 97,617
 137,278
Purchases(185,721) (127,562) (131,505)(35,211) (106,510) (79,514)
Sale of equity securities, at fair value3,537
 
 
Net loan principal (originations) collections(15,029) (27,876) (39,369)(37,958) (81,188) (160,294)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets1,523
 1,775
 2,122
403
 269
 486
Purchases of premises and equipment(5,127) (2,713) (2,488)(2,305) (2,038) (3,804)
Purchases of corporate owned life insurance policies(500) 
 (1,092)
Proceeds from redemption of corporate owned life insurance policies
 
 196

 
 1,353
Purchases of FHLB Stock(1,350) (1,800) (200)
Funding of low income housing tax credit investments(651) (932) (878)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(113,499) (74,826) (69,682)6,470
 (81,755) (69,909)

44


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31Year Ended December 31
2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Net increase (decrease) in deposits90,079
 30,718
 26,099
$27,435
 $70,218
 $30,477
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds20,023
 10,383
 38,325
(4,579) 7,184
 27,962
Cash dividends paid on common stock(7,273) (6,843) (6,456)(8,169) (7,990) (7,645)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock5,201
 4,227
 3,618
6,864
 6,177
 5,023
Common stock repurchased(4,590) (3,122) (2,375)(7,007) (5,181) (4,440)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations(368) (331) (383)(401) (420) (383)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities103,072
 35,032
 58,828
14,143
 69,988
 50,994
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1,663
 (22,232) 12,753
42,623
 7,954
 1,325
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period19,906
 42,138
 29,385
30,848
 22,894
 21,569
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period21,569
 $19,906
 $42,138
$73,471
 $30,848
 $22,894
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:          
Interest paid$10,176
 $10,045
 $11,139
$15,485
 $12,388
 $10,836
Income taxes paid3,493
 1,454
 2,093
50
 3,120
 1,415
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INFORMATION:          
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets$1,158
 $1,371
 $1,672
$467
 $331
 $306


































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
Note 1 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Isabella Bank Corporation, a financial services holding company, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Isabella Bank. All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. References to "the Corporation," “Isabella,” “we,” “our,” “us,”“the Corporation”, “Isabella”, “we”, “our”, “us”, and similar terms refer to the consolidated entity consisting of Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiary. Isabella Bank Corporation refers solelyReferences to the parent holding company, and Isabella Bank or the “Bank” referrefers to Isabella Bank Corporation’s subsidiary, Isabella Bank.
For additional information, see “Note 1918Related Party Transactions.”
NATURE OF OPERATIONS: Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding company offering a wide array of financial products and services in several mid-Michigan counties. Our banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers banking services through 2930 locations, 24 hour banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic teller machines, 24 hour online banking, mobile banking, and direct deposits to businesses, institutions, individuals and individuals.their families. Lending services offered include commercial loans, agricultural loans, residential real estate loans, and consumer loans. Deposit services include interest and noninterest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit.deposit, direct deposits, cash management services, mobile and internet banking, electronic bill pay services, and automated teller machines. Other related financial products include trust and investment services, safe deposit box rentals, and credit life insurance. Active competition, principally from other commercial banks, savings banks and loan associations, mortgage brokers, finance companies, credit unions, and retail brokerage firms exists in all of our principal markets. Our results of operations can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates, and changes in the local economic environment.environment and changes in regulations.
USE OF ESTIMATES: In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the ALLL, the fair value of AFS investment securities, and the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS: Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts such sales or transfers based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Assumptions are developed based on prioritizing information within a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. We may choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates.
For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is our policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements for those financial instruments for which there is an active market. In cases where the market for a financial asset or liability is not active, we include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would make for nonperformance and liquidity risks when developing fair value measurements. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities for which limited or no observable market data exists are accordingly based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Investment securities AFS and derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time-to-time,time to time, we may be required to record other assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans AFS, impaired loans, foreclosed assets, OMSR, goodwill, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downswrite downs of individual assets.

46


Fair Value Hierarchy
Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative guidance, we group assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the prioritization of inputs in the valuation techniques. These levels are:
Level 1:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3:Valuation is generated from model based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Transfers between measurement levels are recognized at the end of reporting periods.
For further discussion of fair value considerations, refer to “Note 2017Fair ValueFair Value..
SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK: Most of our activities are conducted are with customers located within the central Michigan area. A significant amount of our outstanding loans are secured by commercial and residential real estate. Other than these types of loans, there is no significant concentration to any other industry or any one customer.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks, federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts. Generally, federal funds sold are for a one day period. We maintain deposit accounts in various financial institutions which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not insured. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant interest, credit or other financial risk as a result of these deposits.
AFS SECURITIES: Purchases of investment securities are generally classified as AFS. However, we may elect to classify securities as either held to maturity or trading. Securities classified as AFS debt securities are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the effect of deferred income taxes, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Included in AFS securities are auction rate money market preferreds and preferred stocks.securities. These investments, are considered equity securities for federal income tax purposes, and as such,have no estimated federal income tax impact is expected or recorded.given the nature of the investments. Auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the termsterm of the securities. Realized gains and losses on the sale of AFS securities are determined using the specific identification method.
AFS securities are reviewed quarterly for possible OTTI. In determining whether an OTTI exists for debt securities, we assert that: (a) we do not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not we will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. If these conditions are not met, we recognize an OTTI charge through earnings for the difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value, and such amount is included in noninterest income. For debt securities that do not meet the above criteria, and we do not expect to recover the security’s amortized cost basis, the security is considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these debt securities, we separate the total impairment into the credit risk loss component and the amount of the loss related to market and other risk factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, we calculate the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit risk is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income. The amount of the total OTTI related to other risk factors is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. For debt securities that have recognized an OTTI through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a significant increase in the cash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.
AFS equity securities are reviewed for OTTI at each reporting date. This evaluation considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and our ability and intent to hold the securities until fair value recovers. If it is determined that we do not have the ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery or that there are conditions that indicate that a security may not recover in value then the difference between the fair value and the cost of the security is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income.

47


LOANS: Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the levelappropriate yield method.methods.
The accrual of interest on agricultural, commercial and mortgage loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed onin nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged against the ALLL. The interestInterest income on these loans in nonaccrual status is accounted for on the cash-basis,not recognized until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES: The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe the uncollectability of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
We evaluate the ALLL on a regular basis which is based upon ourbasis. Our periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light ofconsiders historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The ALLL consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are deemed to be impaired. For such loans that are also analyzed for specific allowance allocations, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, or collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non classifiednon-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience.experience adjusted for current conditions. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that we believe affect our estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.There has been a charge-off of its principal balance;
2.The loan has been classified as a TDR; or
3.The loan is in nonaccrual status.
Impairment is measured on a loan by loanloan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE: Mortgage loans held for sale on the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses, if any, would be recognized as a component of other noninterest expenses.
Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with the mortgage servicing rights retained by us. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loans sold.
TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS: Transfers of financial assets, including mortgage loans and participation loans, are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is determined to be surrendered when 1) the assets have been legally isolated from us, 2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and 3) we do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Other than servicing, we have no substantive continuing involvement related to these loans.
SERVICING: Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. We have no purchased servicing rights. For sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating the

48


loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranche. If we later determine that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. The unpaid principal balance of mortgages serviced for others was $287,029$259,481 and $288,639$266,789 with capitalized servicing rights of $2,505$2,435 and $2,519$2,409 at December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.
Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal;principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. We recorded servicing fee revenue of $712, $720,$651, $671, and $737$696 related to residential mortgage loans serviced for others during 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively, which is included in other noninterest income.
FORECLOSED ASSETS: Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of our carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write-downswrite downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the ALLL. After foreclosure, property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred. We periodically perform valuations and any subsequent write-downswrite downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of our carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $421$355 and $885$291 as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively, are included in other assets.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT: Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation which is computed principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 40 years. Major improvements are capitalized and appropriately amortized based upon the useful lives of the related assets or the expected terms of the leases, if shorter, using the straight-line method. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occur. We annually review these assets to determine whether carrying values have been impaired.
EQUITY SECURITIES WITHOUT READILY DETERMINABLE FAIR VALUES: Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are our holdings in FHLB stock and FRB stock as well as our ownership interestsinterest in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC and Valley Financial Corporation. Our investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, a title insurance company, was made in the 1st quarter of 2008. We are not the managing entity of Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, and account for our investment in that entity under the equity method of accounting.Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a bank that opened in 2005. We made investments in Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values consist of the following holdings as of December 31:

2015 20142018 2017
FHLB Stock$11,700
 $9,800
$15,050
 $13,700
Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC7,249
 6,936
7,565
 7,421
FRB Stock1,999
 1,999
1,999
 1,999
Valley Financial Corporation1,000
 1,000
Other338
 341
334
 334
Total$22,286
 $20,076
$24,948
 $23,454
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN: At December 31, 2015,2018, the Directors Plan had 200,017220,171 shares eligible to be issued to participants, for which the Rabbi Trust held 19,40116,673 shares. We had 187,369226,909 shares to be issued in 2014,at December 31, 2017, with 13,93431,769 shares held in the Rabbi Trust. Compensation costs relating to share basedshare-based payment transactions are recognized as the services are

49


rendered, with the cost measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued (see “Note 1712Benefit Plans”). We have no other equity-based compensation plans.

CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE: We have purchased life insurance policies on key members of management.management, partially for the purpose of funding certain post-retirement benefits. In the event of death of one of these individuals, we would receive a specified cash payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized on the balance sheet dates.date. Increases in cash surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported as other noninterest income.
As of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the present value of the post retirement benefits payable by us to the covered employeesinsured participants was estimated to be $2,853$2,751 and $2,782,$2,751, respectively, and is included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities. The periodic policy maintenance costs were $71, $83,expenses associated with these policies totaled $0, $577, and $75$(8) for 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013, respectively and are included in other noninterest expenses.2016, respectively.
ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES AND GOODWILL: We previously acquired branch facilities and related deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase. The acquisitions included amounts related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core deposit intangibles). Core deposit intangibles arising from acquisitions are included in goodwill and other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated lives and evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over identifiable assets, is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance is more likely than not to be impaired, we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. This valuation method requires a significant degree of our judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model.
OFF BALANCE SHEET CREDIT RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: In the ordinary course of business, we have entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, commercial lines of credit, home equity lines of credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.
REVENUE RECOGNITION: Our revenue is comprised primarily of interest income, service charges and fees, gains on the sale of loans and AFS securities, earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies, and other noninterest income. Other noninterest income is typically service and performance driven in nature and comprised primarily of investment and trust advisory fees. We recognize revenue, excluding interest income, in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation has been satisfied according to our contractual obligation.
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES: Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax assets or liability isliabilities are determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established, where necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the year plus or minus the change during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted. The law established a flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21%. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the effect of income tax law changes on deferred taxes was recognized as a component of income tax expense related to continuing operations in the period in which the law was enacted. As such, federal income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects the effect of the tax rate change on net deferred tax assets and liabilities (see “Note 15 – Federal Income Taxes” and “Note 16 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)”).
We analyze our filing positions in the jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. We have also elected to retain our existing accounting policy with respect to the treatment oftreat interest and penalties attributable to income taxes, and continue to reflect any charges for such, to the extent they arise, as a component of our noninterest expenses.
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN: We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective March 1, 2007. DefinedThe service cost component of the defined benefit pension plan expenses areis included in “compensation and benefits"benefits” on the consolidated statements of income and areis funded consistent with the requirements of federal laws and regulations. All other costs related to the defined benefit pension plan are included in “other” noninterest expenses on the consolidated statements of income. The current benefit obligation is included in "accrued interest payable and other liabilities" on the consolidated balance sheets. Inherent in the determination of defined benefit pension costs are assumptions concerning future events that will affect the amount and timing of required benefit payments under the plan. These assumptions include demographic assumptions such as mortality, a discount rate used to determine the current benefit obligation and a long-term expected rate of return on plan assets. Net periodic benefit cost includes the interest cost based on the assumed discount rate, an expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value of assets, and amortization of

unrecognized net actuarial gains or losses. Actuarial gains and losses result from experience different from that assumed and from changes in assumptions (excluding asset gains and losses not yet reflected in market-related value). Amortization of actuarial gains and losses is included as a component of net periodic defined benefit pension cost.
For additional information, see "Note 1712Benefit Plans."
MARKETING COSTS: Marketing costs are expensed as incurred (see “Note 1114Other Noninterest Expenses”).
RECLASSIFICATIONS: Certain amounts reported in the 20142017 and 20132016 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 20152018 presentation.

50

Note 2 – Accounting Standards Updates
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates
ASU No. 2014-09: “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
In May 2014, ASU No. 2014-09 was issued and created new Topic 606 to provide a common revenue standard to achieve consistency and clarification to the revenue recognition principles. The guidance outlines steps to achieve the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of Contentspromised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. These steps consist of: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The new authoritative guidance, as amended, was effective on January 1, 2018. We reviewed our contracts related to trust and investment services and those related to other noninterest income to determine if changes in income recognition were required as a result of this guidance. Implementation of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2018.

ASU No. 2016-01: “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities” and ASU No. 2018-03: “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”
In January 2016, ASU No. 2016-01 was issued and sets forth the following: 1) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; 2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment and requiring measurement of the investment at fair value when an impairment exists; 3) for public entities, eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; 4) for public entities, requires the use of exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; 5) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income, the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; 6) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and 7) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity's other deferred tax assets.
RESTATEMENTS: InThe new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. As a result of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, certain prior period financial informationguidance, the change in the fair value of equity investments has been restated duerecorded in net income beginning on January 1, 2018 (see “Note 17 – Fair Value”). Equity securities are now recorded separately from AFS securities at a fair value which approximates an exit price notion. Adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our operations and its future impact will depend on the fair value of these investments, or any securities acquired subsequent to this guidance, at future measurement dates. The disclosures related to equity investment securities reflect a fully retrospective presentation for comparative purposes.
For discussion of the fair value measurement of financial instruments, refer to “Note 17 – Fair Value”.
In February 2018, ASU No. 2018-03 was issued and sets forth correction or improvement amendments for specific issues that may arise within the scope of ASU 2016-01. These amendments have been adopted and did not have a significant impact on our operating results or financial statement disclosures.

ASU No. 2017-08: “Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”
In March 2017, ASU No. 2017-08 amended the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Under current GAAP, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. The amendments in this update shorten the amortization period and require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting correction. Impacted sectionschange for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity.
The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The guidance has been adopted and did not have a significant impact on our operating results or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2017-09: Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”
In May 2017, ASU No. 2017-09 was issued and provided guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the amendments in this update. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all of the Consolidatedfollowing are met:
1. The fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification.
2. The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.
3. The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.
The new authoritative guidance was effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on our operating results or financial statement disclosures.
Pending Accounting Standards Updates
ASU No. 2016-02: “Leases (Topic 842)”
In February 2016, ASU No. 2016-02 was issued to create Topic 842 - Leases which will require recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for leases previously classified as operating leases. Accounting guidance is set forth for both lessee and lessor accounting. Under lessee accounting, a lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term.
For finance leases, a lessee is required to do the following: 1) recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; 2) recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income; and 3) classify repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability and variable lease payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. For operating leases, a lessee is required to do the following: 1) recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; 2) recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis; and 3) classify all cash payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows.
The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under previous GAAP. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We have reviewed our lease agreements to determine the appropriate treatment under this guidance. These changes will not have a significant impact on our operating results or financial statement disclosures upon adoption.
In July 2018, ASU No. 2018-10 was issued and provided codification improvements for various leasing issues. Also during July 2018, ASU No. 2018-11 was issued for targeted improvements related to the transition of the new guidance. In December

2018, ASU No. 2018-20 was issued and provided narrow-scope improvements for lessors. These updates are effective with the implementation of ASU 2016-02.
ASU No. 2016-13: “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial StatementsInstruments”
In June 2016, ASU No. 2016-13 was issued and updated the measurement for credit losses for AFS debt securities and assets measured at amortized cost which include loans, trade receivables, and any other financial assets with the contractual right to receive cash. Current GAAP requires an “incurred loss” methodology for recognizing credit losses that delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Under the incurred loss approach, entities are limited to a probable initial recognition threshold when credit losses are measured under GAAP; an entity generally only considers past events and current conditions in measuring the incurred loss.
Under the new guidance, the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP is replaced with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses (CECL). This methodology requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to calculate credit loss estimates. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances which applies to assets measured either collectively or individually.
The update allows an entity to revert to historical loss information that is reflective of the contractual term (considering the effect of prepayments) for periods that are beyond the time frame for which the entity is able to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts. In addition, the disclosures of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables, a current disclosure requirement, are further disaggregated by year of origination (or vintage). The vintage information will be useful for financial statement users to better assess changes in underwriting standards and credit quality trends in asset portfolios over time and the effect of those changes on credit losses.
Overall, the update will allow entities the ability to measure expected credit losses without the restriction of incurred or probable losses that exist under current GAAP. For users of the financial statements, the update requires disclosure of decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and may have a significant impact on our operations and financial statement disclosures as well as that of the banking industry as a whole.
We have invested a considerable amount of effort toward this guidance and will continue to invest considerable effort until its effective date. A committee was formed and has developed a road map to implementation, and the committee is accountable for timely and accurate adoption of the guidance. A company that has been focused on the ALLL for more than 10 years and serves hundreds of financial institutions has been engaged to provide us with education, advisory, and software solutions exclusively related to the ACL. We expect to run parallel processes during 2019, which will help to ensure we are ready to calculate, review, and report the ACL by the required implementation date.
In November 2018, ASU No. 2018-19 was issued and provided codification improvements for two issues: transition and effective date for nonpublic business entities and operating lease receivables. The update is effective with the implementation of ASU 2016-13 and is not expected to impact our operating results or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2018-13: “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”
In August 2018, ASU No. 2018-13 was issued and provided an updated framework related to fair value disclosures. For entities required to make disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements, the update provides disclosure modifications which include the removal, modification and addition of specific disclosure requirements.
The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and will impact our financial statement disclosures.

ASU No. 2018-14: “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Pension Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”
In August 2018, ASU No. 2018-14 was issued and provided updated framework related to defined benefit plans. For employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans, the update provides disclosure modifications which include the removal of six specific requirements, the addition of two specific requirements and clarification to existing requirements.
Disclosure additions include 1) the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates; 2) an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. Clarification items relate to 1) the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and fair value of plan assets for plans with PBOs in excess of plan assets; and 2) the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) and fair value of plan assets for plans with ABOs in excess of plan assets.
The new authoritative guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and will likely impact our financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2018-15: “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract”
In August 2018, ASU No. 2018-15 was issued and provided guidance on the accounting for implementation, setup, and other upfront costs (collectively referred to as implementation costs) for entities that are a customer in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The guidance also provides clarification on requirements to capitalize implementation costs and the required accounting for expenses related to capitalization of implementation costs.
The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The impact on our operating results and financial statement disclosures as a result of this update will depend upon our arrangements and whether or not they meet the requirement to be capitalized.
ASU No. 2018-16: “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate of Hedge Accounting Purposes”
In October 2018, ASU No. 2018-16 was issued and permits the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate. Including the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible benchmark interest rate during the early stages of the marketplace transition will facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition and provide sufficient lead time for entities to prepare for changes to interest rate risk hedging strategies for both risk management and hedge accounting purposes.
For entities that have not already adopted ASU No. 2017-12 (“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”), the amendments in this update are required to be adopted concurrently with the amendments in ASU No. 2017-12. For entities that already have adopted ASU No. 2017-12, the amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update are not expected to have a significant impact on our operating results or financial statement disclosures.

Note 3 – AFS Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows as of December 31:
 2018

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$172
 $
 $2
 $170
States and political subdivisions188,992
 2,125
 251
 190,866
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 646
 2,554
Mortgage-backed securities189,688
 76
 5,280
 184,484
Collateralized mortgage obligations119,193
 71
 2,504
 116,760
Total$501,245
 $2,272
 $8,683
 $494,834
 2017

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$217
 $
 $1
 $216
States and political subdivisions204,131
 4,486
 143
 208,474
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 151
 3,049
Mortgage-backed securities210,757
 390
 2,350
 208,797
Collateralized mortgage obligations129,607
 160
 1,573
 128,194
Total$547,912
 $5,036
 $4,218
 $548,730
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2018 are as follows:
 Maturing Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities  

Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
  Total
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $172
 $
 $
 $
 $172
States and political subdivisions23,151
 81,901
 55,923
 28,017
 
 188,992
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 189,688
 189,688
Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
 
 
 119,193
 119,193
Total amortized cost$23,151
 $82,073
 $55,923
 $28,017
 $312,081
 $501,245
Fair value$23,189
 $82,662
 $56,842
 $28,343
 $303,798
 $494,834
Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
As the auction rate money market preferred investments have continual call dates, they are not reported by a specific maturity group. Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.
A summary of the sales activity of AFS securities during the years ended December 31 is displayed in the following table. There were no sales of AFS securities during 2018.
 2017 2016
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities$12,827
 $35,664
Gross realized gains (losses)$142
 $245
Applicable income tax expense (benefit)$48
 $83

The following information pertains to AFS securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position.
 2018
 Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $
 $2
 $170
 $2
States and political subdivisions83
 14,732
 168
 15,090
 251
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 646
 2,554
 646
Mortgage-backed securities896
 43,485
 4,384
 124,253
 5,280
Collateralized mortgage obligations199
 21,886
 2,305
 87,929
 2,504
Total$1,178
 $80,103
 $7,505
 $229,996
 $8,683
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  66
   102
 168
 2017
 Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$1
 $216
 $
 $
 $1
States and political subdivisions142
 16,139
 1
 188
 143
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 151
 3,049
 151
Mortgage-backed securities454
 72,007
 1,896
 76,065
 2,350
Collateralized mortgage obligations701
 76,435
 872
 25,308
 1,573
Total$1,298
 $164,797
 $2,920
 $104,610
 $4,218
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  81
   24
 105
Unrealized losses on our AFS securities portfolio are the result of recent increases in intermediate-term and long-term benchmark interest rates and not credit issues.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we conducted an analysis to determine whether any securities currently in an unrealized loss position should be identified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Such analyses considered, among other factors, the following criteria:
Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
Is it probable the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?
Is it more likely than not that we will have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?
Has the duration of the investment been extended?
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we identified one municipal bond as other-than-temporarily impaired. While management estimated the OTTI to be realized, we also engaged the services of an independent investment valuation firm to estimate the amount of impairment as of December 31, 2016. The valuation calculated the estimated market value utilizing two different approaches:
1) Market - Appraisal and Comparable Investments
2) Income - Discounted Cash Flow Method
The two methods were then weighted, with a higher weighting applied to the Market approach, to determine the estimated impairment. As a result of this analysis, we reduced the carrying value to $230 which required us to recognize an OTTI of $770 in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2016. Based on internal analysis of the bond as of December 31, 2018, a change in the estimated valuation was not deemed necessary and the carrying value of this bond remained at $230.

The following table provides a roll-forward of credit related impairment recorded in earnings for the years ended December 31:

2018 2017 2016
Balance at beginning of the period$770
 $770
 $
Additions to credit losses for which no previous OTTI was recognized
 
 770
Reductions for credit losses realized on securities sold during the period
 
 
Balance at end of the period$770
 $770
 $770
Based on our analysis which included the criteria outlined above, the fact that we have asserted that we do not have the intent to sell AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, and considering it is unlikely that we will have to sell any AFS securities in an unrealized loss position before recovery of their cost basis, we do not believe that the values of any other AFS securities are other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, with the exception of the one municipal bond discussed above.
Note 4 – Loans and ALLL
We grant commercial, agricultural, residential real estate, and consumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, manufacturing, retail, gaming, tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of our consumer and residential real estate loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees. Some loans are unsecured.
Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold in our portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the appropriate yield methods.
The accrual of interest on commercial, agricultural, and residential real estate loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of short-term collection. Upon transferring the loans to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge-offs are necessary. Consumer loans are typically charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed in nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
When loans are placed in nonaccrual status or charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the ALLL. Loans may be returned to accrual status after six months of continuous performance and achievement of current payment status.
Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, advances to mortgage brokers, farmland and agricultural production, and loans to states and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business. We minimize our risk by limiting the amount of direct credit exposure to any one borrower to $15,000. Borrowers with direct credit needs of more than $15,000 may be serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans commonly require loan-to-value limits of 80% or less. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, we may require the borrower to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, property, or equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, we may require annual financial statements, prepare cash flow analyses, and review credit reports.
We entered into a mortgage purchase program in 2016 with a financial institution where we participate in advances to mortgage brokers ("advances"). The mortgage brokers originate residential mortgage loans with the intent to sell them on the secondary market. We participate in the advance to the mortgage broker, which is secured by the underlying mortgage loan, until it is ultimately sold on the secondary market. As such, the average life of each participated advance is approximately 20-30 days. Funds from the sale of the loan are used to pay off our participation in the advance to the mortgage broker. We classify these advances as commercial loans and include the outstanding balance in commercial loans on our consolidated balance sheet. Under the participation agreement, we committed to a maximum outstanding aggregate amount of $30,000. The difference between our outstanding balance and the maximum outstanding aggregate amount is classified as “Unfunded commitments

under lines of credit” in the “Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments” section of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report.
We offer adjustable rate mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate residential real estate loans which have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. We consider the anticipated direction of interest rates, balance sheet duration, the sensitivity of our balance sheet to changes in interest rates, our liquidity needs, and overall loan demand to determine whether or not to sell fixed rate loans to Freddie Mac.
Our lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on residential real estate loans to 100% of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price. Private mortgage insurance is typically required on loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% unless the loan qualifies for government guarantees.
Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans generally include:
Evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments.
Evaluation of the value of the property securing the loan.
Ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed 28% of a borrower’s gross income.
Ensuring all debt servicing does not exceed 40% of income.
Verification of acceptable credit reports.
Verification of employment, income, and financial information.
Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed for appropriateness. Generally, mortgage loan requests are reviewed by our mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market underwriting system; loans in excess of $1,000 require the approval of our Internal Loan Committee, the Executive Loan Committee, the Board of Directors’ Loan Committee, or the Board of Directors.
Consumer loans include secured and unsecured personal loans. Loans are amortized for a period of up to 15 years based on the age and value of the underlying collateral. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value. No consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.
The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when we believe the uncollectability of the loan balance is probable. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL.
The ALLL is evaluated on a regular basis for appropriateness. Our periodic review of the collectability of the loans considers historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the ALLL are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the loan’s outstanding balance and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell. Historical loss allocations are calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio, with the exception of advances to mortgage brokers, over the preceding five years. With no historical losses on advances to mortgage brokers, there is no allocation in the commercial segment displayed in the following tables. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A summary of changes in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:

Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2018$1,706
 $611
 $2,563
 $900
 $1,920
 $7,700
Charge-offs(626) 
 (151) (324) 
 (1,101)
Recoveries328
 
 261
 209
 
 798
Provision for loan losses1,155
 164
 (681) 72
 268
 978
December 31, 2018$2,563
 $775
 $1,992
 $857
 $2,188
 $8,375
 Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2017

Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2017$1,814
 $884
 $2,664
 $624
 $1,414
 $7,400
Charge-offs(265) 
 (200) (306) 
 (771)
Recoveries453
 
 206
 159
 
 818
Provision for loan losses(296) (273) (107) 423
 506
 253
December 31, 2017$1,706
 $611
 $2,563
 $900
 $1,920
 $7,700

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2018
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$443
 $132
 $1,363
 $
 $
 $1,938
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,120
 643
 629
 857
 2,188
 6,437
Total$2,563
 $775
 $1,992
 $857
 $2,188
 $8,375
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$9,899
 $14,298
 $6,893
 $9
   $31,099
Collectively evaluated for impairment649,630
 112,863
 268,450
 66,665
   1,097,608
Total$659,529
 $127,161
 $275,343
 $66,674
   $1,128,707

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2017
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$650
 $
 $1,480
 $
 $
 $2,130
Collectively evaluated for impairment1,056
 611
 1,083
 900
 1,920
 5,570
Total$1,706
 $611
 $2,563
 $900
 $1,920
 $7,700
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$8,099
 $10,598
 $7,939
 $17
   $26,653
Collectively evaluated for impairment626,660
 117,671
 264,429
 56,106
   1,064,866
Total$634,759
 $128,269
 $272,368
 $56,123
   $1,091,519

The following tables display the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit risk ratings as of December 31:
 2018
 Commercial Agricultural  

Real Estate Other Advances to Mortgage Brokers Total Real Estate Other Total Total
Rating               
1 - Excellent$21
 $31
 $
 $52
 $51
 $28
 $79
 $131
2 - High quality4,564
 13,473
 
 18,037
 2,729
 613
 3,342
 21,379
3 - High satisfactory127,573
 43,199
 11,793
 182,565
 18,325
 7,039
 25,364
 207,929
4 - Low satisfactory344,920
 84,634
 
 429,554
 46,636
 19,344
 65,980
 495,534
5 - Special mention12,847
 5,287
 
 18,134
 10,520
 5,624
 16,144
 34,278
6 - Substandard7,428
 2,002
 
 9,430
 6,343
 4,960
 11,303
 20,733
7 - Vulnerable334
 1,423
 
 1,757
 2,716
 2,233
 4,949
 6,706
8 - Doubtful
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 - Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total$497,687
 $150,049
 $11,793
 $659,529
 $87,320
 $39,841
 $127,161
 $786,690
 2017  
 Commercial Agricultural  

Real Estate Other Advances to Mortgage Brokers Total Real Estate Other Total Total
Rating               
1 - Excellent$24
 $316
 $
 $340
 $
 $34
 $34
 $374
2 - High quality8,402
 12,262
 
 20,664
 2,909
 1,024
 3,933
 24,597
3 - High satisfactory131,826
 46,668
 12,081
 190,575
 21,072
 8,867
 29,939
 220,514
4 - Low satisfactory326,166
 75,591
 
 401,757
 47,835
 18,467
 66,302
 468,059
5 - Special mention8,986
 3,889
 
 12,875
 10,493
 8,546
 19,039
 31,914
6 - Substandard5,521
 2,298
 
 7,819
 4,325
 2,747
 7,072
 14,891
7 - Vulnerable729
 
 
 729
 1,531
 419
 1,950
 2,679
8 - Doubtful
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 - Loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total$481,654
 $141,024
 $12,081
 $634,759
 $88,165
 $40,104
 $128,269
 $763,028
Internally assigned credit risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned credit risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:
1. EXCELLENT – Substantially Risk Free
Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:
High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.
Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.
Experienced management, with management succession in place.
Secured by cash.

2. HIGH QUALITY – Limited Risk
Credit with sound financial condition and a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:
Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.
Ability to meet all obligations when due.
Management with successful track record.
Steady and satisfactory earnings history.
If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.
Access to alternative financing.
Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.
If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.
3.HIGH SATISFACTORY – Reasonable Risk
Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:
Working capital adequate to support operations.
Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.
Management experience and depth appear favorable.
Loan performing according to terms.
If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.
4. LOW SATISFACTORY – Acceptable Risk
Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:
Would include most start-up businesses.
Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency – may have been 10-30 days slow within the past year.
Management’s abilities are apparent yet unproven.
Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.
Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.
If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.
To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.
5. SPECIAL MENTION – Criticized
Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitutes an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:
Downward trend in sales, profit levels, and margins.
Impaired working capital position.
Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.
Loan delinquency (30-60 days) and overdrafts may occur.
Shrinking equity cushion.
Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.
Management abilities are questionable.
Weak industry conditions.
Litigation pending against the borrower.

Loan may need to be restructured to improve collateral position or reduce payments.
Collateral or guaranty offers limited protection.
Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.
6. SUBSTANDARD – Classified
Credit is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. There is a distinct possibility we will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. Any commercial loan placed in nonaccrual status will be rated "7" or worse. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:
Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.
Deteriorating liquidity.
Serious management problems or internal fraud.
Original repayment terms liberalized.
Likelihood of bankruptcy.
Inability to access other funding sources.
Reliance on secondary source of repayment.
Litigation filed against borrower.
Interest non-accrual may be warranted.
Collateral provides little or no value.
Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.
Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.
7.VULNERABLE – Classified
Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing in nonaccrual status. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:
Insufficient cash flow to service debt.
Minimal or no payments being received.
Limited options available to avoid the collection process.
Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.
8. DOUBTFUL – Workout
Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:
Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.
Seriously impaired cash flow.
Original repayment terms materially altered.
Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.
Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.
Collection process has begun.
Bankruptcy petition has been filed.
Judgments have been filed.
Portion of the loan balance has been charged-off.

9. LOSS – Charge-off
Credit is considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification is for charged-off loans but does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value. These loans are further characterized by:
Liquidation or reorganization under Bankruptcy, with poor prospects of collection.
Fraudulently overstated assets and/or earnings.
Collateral has marginal or no value.
Debtor cannot be located.
Over 120 days delinquent.
Our primary credit quality indicator for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the past due and current loans as of December 31:
 2018
 Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual  Current Total
Commercial             
Commercial real estate$60
 $
 $
 $334
 $394
 $497,293
 $497,687
Commercial other277
 628
 
 1,423
 2,328
 147,721
 150,049
Advances to mortgage brokers
 
 
 
 
 11,793
 11,793
Total commercial337
 628
 
 1,757
 2,722
 656,807
 659,529
Agricultural             
Agricultural real estate428
 
 
 2,716
 3,144
 84,176
 87,320
Agricultural other
 
 
 2,233
 2,233
 37,608
 39,841
Total agricultural428
 
 
 4,949
 5,377
 121,784
 127,161
Residential real estate             
Senior liens2,254
 203
 113
 554
 3,124
 233,438
 236,562
Junior liens2
 6
 
 
 8
 6,001
 6,009
Home equity lines of credit76
 
 
 
 76
 32,696
 32,772
Total residential real estate2,332
 209
 113
 554
 3,208
 272,135
 275,343
Consumer             
Secured95
 
 
 
 95
 62,721
 62,816
Unsecured10
 
 
 
 10
 3,848
 3,858
Total consumer105
 
 
 
 105
 66,569
 66,674
Total$3,202
 $837
 $113
 $7,260
 $11,412
 $1,117,295
 $1,128,707

 2017
 Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual  Current Total
Commercial             
Commercial real estate$295
 $325
 $54
 $729
 $1,403
 $480,251
 $481,654
Commercial other1,069
 28
 18
 
 1,115
 139,909
 141,024
Advances to mortgage brokers
 
 
 
 
 12,081
 12,081
Total commercial1,364
 353
 72
 729
 2,518
 632,241
 634,759
Agricultural             
Agricultural real estate84
 190
 
 1,531
 1,805
 86,360
 88,165
Agricultural other39
 
 104
 419
 562
 39,542
 40,104
Total agricultural123
 190
 104
 1,950
 2,367
 125,902
 128,269
Residential real estate             
Senior liens3,718
 234
 132
 325
 4,409
 225,007
 229,416
Junior liens69
 10
 
 23
 102
 6,812
 6,914
Home equity lines of credit293
 
 77
 
 370
 35,668
 36,038
Total residential real estate4,080
 244
 209
 348
 4,881
 267,487
 272,368
Consumer             
Secured37
 10
 10
 
 57
 52,005
 52,062
Unsecured13
 
 
 
 13
 4,048
 4,061
Total consumer50
 10
 10
 
 70
 56,053
 56,123
Total$5,617
 $797
 $395
 $3,027
 $9,836
 $1,081,683
 $1,091,519
Impaired Loans
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.Consolidated Balance Sheet as
There has been a charge-off of December 31, 2014, Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013; andits principal balance (in whole or in part);
2.Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsThe loan has been classified as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 2014 and 2013.a TDR; or
3.
The loan is in nonaccrual status.
BackgroundImpairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of Restatement
The necessary restatement was identified by management inexpected future cash flows discounted at the fourth quarter of 2015 duringloan’s effective interest rate, or the course of our preparationfair value of the consolidated financial statementscollateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Large groups of smaller-balance, homogeneous residential real estate and evaluationconsumer loans are collectively evaluated for impairment by comparing the loan’s unpaid principal balance to the present value of financial resultsexpected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate.

We do not recognize interest income on impaired loans in nonaccrual status. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income is recognized daily, as earned, according to the terms of the loan agreement and the principal amount outstanding. The following summarizes information pertaining to impaired loans as of, and for the yearyears ended, December 31, 2015. The restatements relate31:

2018

Recorded Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Recorded Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate$3,969
 $4,211
 $437
 $4,589
 $129
Commercial other12
 12
 6
 1,040
 55
Agricultural real estate392
 392
 112
 606
 50
Agricultural other44
 44
 20
 168
 46
Residential real estate senior liens6,834
 7,289
 1,361
 7,545
 126
Residential real estate junior liens12
 12
 2
 25
 
Home equity lines of credit
 
 
 
 
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance11,263
 11,960
 1,938
 13,973
 406
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate2,794
 2,947
   2,728
 74
Commercial other3,124
 3,231
   1,533
 43
Agricultural real estate7,618
 7,618
   7,559
 585
Agricultural other6,244
 6,287
   4,636
 279
Home equity lines of credit47
 347
   64
 5
Consumer secured9
 9
   12
 
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance19,836
 20,439
 

 16,532
 986
Impaired loans         
Commercial9,899
 10,401
 443
 9,890
 301
Agricultural14,298
 14,341
 132
 12,969
 960
Residential real estate6,893
 7,648
 1,363
 7,634
 131
Consumer9
 9
 
 12
 
Total impaired loans$31,099
 $32,399
 $1,938
 $30,505
 $1,392

 2017

Recorded Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Recorded Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate$4,089
 $4,378
 $626
 $4,608
 $277
Commercial other995
 995
 24
 1,427
 93
Agricultural real estate
 
 
 
 
Agricultural other
 
 
 17
 
Residential real estate senior liens7,816
 8,459
 1,473
 8,296
 323
Residential real estate junior liens44
 44
 7
 71
 2
Home equity lines of credit
 
 
 23
 
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance12,944
 13,876
 2,130
 14,442
 695
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate1,791
 1,865
   1,585
 111
Commercial other1,224
 1,224
   246
 23
Agricultural real estate7,913
 7,913
   6,421
 307
Agricultural other2,685
 2,685
   2,494
 126
Home equity lines of credit79
 379
   106
 19
Consumer secured17
 17
   21
 
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance13,709
 14,083
   10,873
 586
Impaired loans         
Commercial8,099
 8,462
 650
 7,866
 504
Agricultural10,598
 10,598
 
 8,932
 433
Residential real estate7,939
 8,882
 1,480
 8,496
 344
Consumer17
 17
 
 21
 
Total impaired loans$26,653
 $27,959
 $2,130
 $25,315
 $1,281
We had committed to the accounting for deferred costs associatedadvance $542 and $472 in connection with originatingimpaired loans, (under ASC 310-20) and the proper classification of the net deferred costs recorded in gross loans within the consolidated balance sheets and as a deferral of compensation expenses within the consolidated statements of income. Prior to December 31, 2015, loan origination cost deferrals (under ASC 310-20) were reported in loan interest and fee income instead of as a reduction of compensation and benefits, which is included in other noninterest expenses. Additionally, net deferred asset balances (under ASC 310-20) prior to December 31, 2015 were reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets instead of reported in gross loans. Amortization of the net deferred asset balance was recognized appropriately in loan interest and fee income.
Impact of Restatement
The overall impact of the restatement on our consolidated financial position and results of operations is not believed to be material and as such, previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement have not been amended. The determination of materiality was, in part, concluded based on the following observations:
No impact to net income for any prior periods;
No impact to earnings per share, other stock data, or dividend data for any prior periods;
No impact on total assets for any prior periods; and
No impact on retained earnings or total equity for any prior periods.
The impact to the consolidated balance sheetincludes TDRs, as of December 31, 2014 was2018 and 2017, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A loan modification is considered to be a $2,968 increase in gross loans andTDR when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a $2,968 decline in other assets. There were no other changes to the consolidated balance sheets for any prior periods.borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.
Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:
1.Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.
2.Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for loans with similar risk characteristics.
3.Agreeing to an interest only payment structure and delaying principal payments.
4.Forgiving principal.
5.Forgiving accrued interest.
To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, factors we consider include:
1.The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.
2.The borrower would likely default on any of their debt if the concession is not granted.
3.The borrower’s cash flow is insufficient to service all of their debt if the concession is not granted.
4.The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.
5.The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).

The following table sets forthis a summary of information pertaining to TDRs granted in the effects ofyears ended December 31:
 2018 2017

Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other4
 $1,360
 $1,360
 6
 $1,702
 $1,702
Agricultural other31
 6,318
 6,295
 15
 6,092
 6,092
Residential real estate           
Senior liens10
 701
 701
 6
 464
 464
Junior liens
 
 
 1
 8
 8
Total residential real estate10
 701
 701
 7
 472
 472
Total45
 $8,379
 $8,356
 28
 $8,266
 $8,266
The following tables summarize concessions we granted to borrowers in financial difficulty in the restatementyears ended December 31:
 2018 2017

Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
 Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other1
 $174
 3
 $1,186
 
 $
 6
 $1,702
Agricultural other18
 2,625
 13
 3,693
 11
 1,972
 4
 4,120
Residential real estate               
Senior liens3
 203
 7
 498
 
 
 6
 464
Junior liens
 
 
 
 1
 8
 
 
Total residential real estate3
 203
 7
 498
 1
 8
 6
 464
Total22
 $3,002
 23
 $5,377
 12
 $1,980
 16
 $6,286
We did not restructure any loans by forgiving principal or accrued interest during 2018 or 2017.
Based on itemsour historical loss experience, losses associated with TDRs are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the Consolidated Statements of Income. Sincesame loan segment. As such, TDRs, including TDRs that have been modified in the restatement did not impact net income, pre-tax and adjustments net of taxpast 12 months that subsequently defaulted, are not included.analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment.
 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
 Previously Reported Restated Previously Reported Restated
Interest income       
Loans, including fees$39,432
 $36,629
 $41,233
 $37,575
All other interest income14,519
 14,519
 12,843
 12,843
Total interest income53,951
 51,148
 54,076
 50,418
Total interest expense9,970
 9,970
 11,021
 11,021
Net interest income43,981
 41,178
 43,055
 39,397
Provision for loan losses(668) (668) 1,111
 1,111
Net interest income after provision for loan losses44,649
 41,846
 41,944
 38,286
Total noninterest income9,325
 9,325
 10,175
 10,175
Noninterest expenses       
Compensation and benefits21,305
 18,502
 21,465
 17,807
All other noninterest expenses16,601
 16,601
 15,948
 15,948
Total noninterest expenses37,906
 35,103
 37,413
 33,755
Federal income tax expense2,344
 2,344
 2,196
 2,196
Net income$13,724
 $13,724
 $12,510
 $12,510
As demonstrated above, loan interest and fee income and compensation and benefits were reduced by $2,803 and $3,658 duringWe had no loans that defaulted in the years ended December 31, 20142018 and 2013, respectively.
All amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K affected by2017, which were modified within 12 months prior to the restatement adjustments reflect such amounts as restated.

51


Note 2 – Computation of Earnings Per Common Sharedefault date.
Basic earnings per common share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average numberThe following is a summary of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued relate solely to outstanding shares in the Directors PlanTDR, see “Note 17 – Benefit Plans.”
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following: loan balances as of December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation7,775,988
 7,734,161
 7,694,392
Average potential effect of common shares in the Directors Plan (1)177,988
 171,393
 168,948
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share7,953,976
 7,905,554
 7,863,340
Net income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
Earnings per common share     
Basic$1.95
 $1.77
 $1.63
Diluted$1.90
 $1.74
 $1.59
 2018 2017
TDRs$26,951
 $26,197
(1)

Exclusive of shares held in the Rabbi Trust
Note 3 – Accounting Standards Updates
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates
ASU No. 2014-04: “Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
In January 2014, ASU No. 2014-04 amended ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" to provide clarification as to when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan. Specifically, the update defined physical possession to appropriately derecognize the loan and recognize the real estate as OREO. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2014-11: “Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures
In June 2014, ASU No. 2014-11 amended ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing” to address concerns that current accounting guidance distinguishes between repurchase agreements that settle at the same time as the maturity of the transferred financial asset and those that settle any time before maturity. The update changed the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting and, for repurchase financing arrangements, separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which resulted in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
Pending Accounting Standards Updates
ASU No. 2015-01: “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items
In January 2015, ASU No. 2015-01 amended ASC Topic 225, “Income Statement” to eliminate the concept of extraordinary items. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2015-02: “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
In February 2015, ASU No. 2015-02 amended ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation” to provide consolidation guidance on legal entities when the reporting entity’s contractual rights do not give it the ability to act primarily on its own behalf, the reporting entity does not hold a majority of the legal entity’s voting rights, or the reporting entity is not exposed to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits or obligations. The amendments in this update affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate

52


whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:
1.Modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities.
2.Eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.
3.Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships.
4.Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds.
The amendments of this update affect limited partnerships and similar legal entities including fees paid and fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary. The following three main provisions affect limited partnerships and similar legal entities:
1.There is an additional requirement that limited partnerships and similar legal entities must meet to qualify as voting interest entities. A limited partnership must provide partners with either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the general partner to meet this requirement.
2.The specialized consolidation model and guidance for limited partnerships and similar legal entities have been eliminated. There is no longer a presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.
3.For limited partnerships and similar legal entities that qualify as voting interest entities, a limited partner with a controlling financial interest should consolidate a limited partnership. A controlling financial interest may be achieved through holding a limited partner interest that provides substantive kick-out rights.
The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2015-05: “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement“
In April 2015, ASU No. 2015-05 amended ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other” to provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2015-07: “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)“
In May 2015, ASU No. 2015-07 amended ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” to remove the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amendments also remove the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2015-14: “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date“
In August 2015, ASU No. 2015-14 was issued to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” by one year. The new authoritative guidance is now effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new authoritative guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.

53


ASU No. 2015-16: “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments“
In September 2015, ASU No. 2015-16 was issued to require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The update requires that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, the amendments in this update eliminate the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2016-01: “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities“
In January 2016, ASU No. 2016-01 set forth the following: 1) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; 2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment and when an impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; 3) for public entities, eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (4) for public entities, requires the use of exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (5) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income, the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (6) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity's other deferred tax assets. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations or financial statement disclosures.
Note 4 – AFS Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows as of December 31:
 2015

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$24,407
 $13
 $75
 $24,345
States and political subdivisions224,752
 7,511
 46
 232,217
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 334
 2,866
Preferred stocks3,800
 
 501
 3,299
Mortgage-backed securities264,109
 1,156
 1,881
 263,384
Collateralized mortgage obligations134,080
 1,136
 1,191
 134,025
Total$654,348
 $9,816
 $4,028
 $660,136
 2014

Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Government sponsored enterprises$24,597
 $10
 $471
��$24,136
States and political subdivisions209,153
 6,986
 794
 215,345
Auction rate money market preferred3,200
 
 581
 2,619
Preferred stocks6,800
 31
 691
 6,140
Mortgage-backed securities165,888
 2,042
 1,004
 166,926
Collateralized mortgage obligations152,255
 1,533
 1,420
 152,368
Total$561,893
 $10,602
 $4,961
 $567,534

54


The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2015 are as follows:
 Maturing Securities with Variable Monthly Payments or Noncontractual Maturities  

Due in
One Year
or Less
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
  Total
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $24,029
 $378
 $
 $
 $24,407
States and political subdivisions30,174
 69,245
 92,561
 32,772
 
 224,752
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 
 
 3,200
 3,200
Preferred stocks
 
 
 
 3,800
 3,800
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 264,109
 264,109
Collateralized mortgage obligations
 
 
 
 134,080
 134,080
Total amortized cost$30,174
 $93,274
 $92,939
 $32,772
 $405,189
 $654,348
Fair value$30,217
 $95,452
 $96,871
 $34,022
 $403,574
 $660,136
Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
As the auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks have continual call dates, they are not reported by a specific maturity group. Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.
A summary of the sales activity of AFS securities was as follows during the years ended December 31:
 2015 2014 2013
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities$1,319
 $13,362
 $16,229
Gross realized gains (losses)$163
 $97
 $171
Applicable income tax expense (benefit)$55
 $33
 $58
The cost basis used to determine the realized gains or losses of AFS securities sold was the amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.
Information pertaining to AFS securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:
 2015
 Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $
 $75
 $4,925
 $75
States and political subdivisions14
 3,355
 32
 2,623
 46
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 334
 2,866
 334
Preferred stocks
 
 501
 3,299
 501
Mortgage-backed securities882
 131,885
 999
 37,179
 1,881
Collateralized mortgage obligations415
 53,441
 776
 26,717
 1,191
Total$1,311
 $188,681
 $2,717
 $77,609
 $4,028
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  36
   26
 62

55


 2014
 Less Than Twelve Months Twelve Months or More  

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Total
Unrealized
Losses
Government sponsored enterprises$
 $
 $471
 $23,525
 $471
States and political subdivisions48
 5,323
 746
 17,416
 794
Auction rate money market preferred
 
 581
 2,619
 581
Preferred stocks
 
 691
 3,109
 691
Mortgage-backed securities5
 9,456
 999
 52,407
 1,004
Collateralized mortgage obligations105
 29,435
 1,315
 39,540
 1,420
Total$158
 $44,214
 $4,803
 $138,616
 $4,961
Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:  22
   72
 94
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we conducted an analysis to determine whether any securities currently in an unrealized loss position, should be other-than-temporarily impaired. Such analyses considered, among other factors, the following criteria:
Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
Is it probable the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?
Is it more likely than not that we will have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?
Has the duration of the investment been extended?
During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, we had one state issued student loan auction rate AFS investment security (which is included in states and political subdivisions) that was downgraded by Moody's from A3 to Caa3. As a result of this downgrade, we engaged the services of an independent investment valuation firm to estimate the amount of credit losses (if any) related to this particular issue as of March 31, 2012. The evaluation calculated a range of estimated credit losses utilizing two different bifurcation methods:
1) Discounted Cash Flow Method
2) Credit Yield Analysis Method
The two methods were then weighted, with a higher weighting applied to the Discounted Cash Flow Method, to determine the estimated credit related impairment. As a result of this analysis, we recognized an OTTI of $282 in earnings in the three month period ended March 31, 2012.
A summary of key valuation assumptions used in the aforementioned analysis as of March 31, 2012, follows:
Discounted Cash Flow Method
Ratings
FitchNot Rated
Moody'sCaa3
S&PA
SenioritySenior
Discount rateLIBOR + 6.35%
Credit Yield Analysis Method
Credit discount rateLIBOR + 4.00%
Average observed discounts based on closed transactions14.00%

56


To test for additional impairment of this security, we obtained investment valuations (from the same firm engaged to perform the initial valuation as of March 31, 2012) on a quarterly basis until the security was sold on November 25, 2015. Based on our analyses, no additional OTTI was recorded while the security was held. The following table provides a roll-forward of credit related impairment recognized in earnings for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Balance at beginning of year$282
 $282
 $282
Additions to credit losses for which no previous OTTI was recognized
 
 
Reductions for credit losses realized on securities sold during the quarter(282) 
 
Balance at end of year$
 $282
 $282
Based on our analyses, the fact that we have asserted that we do not have the intent to sell AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, and considering it is unlikely that we will have to sell any AFS securities in an unrealized loss position before recovery of their cost basis, we do not believe that the values of any AFS securities were other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014.
Note 5 – Loans and ALLL
We grant commercial, agricultural, residential real estate, and consumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, manufacturing, retail, gaming, tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of our consumer and residential real estate loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees; a portion of loans are unsecured.
Loans that we have the intent and ability to hold in our portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.
The accrual of interest on commercial, agricultural, and residential real estate loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection. Upon transferring the loans to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge-offs are necessary. Consumer loans are typically charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the ALLL. Loans may be returned to accrual status after six months of continuous performance.
Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, farmland and agricultural production, and states and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business. We minimize our risk by limiting the amount of direct credit exposure to any one borrower to $15,000. Borrowers with direct credit needs of more than $15,000 are serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans commonly require loan-to-value limits of 80% or less. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, we may require the borrower to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, we require annual financial statements, prepare cash flow analyses, and review credit reports.
We offer adjustable rate mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate residential real estate loans which have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. We consider the anticipated direction of interest rates, balance sheet duration, the sensitivity of our balance sheet to changes in interest rates, and overall loan demand to determine whether or not to sell fixed rate loans to Freddie Mac.
Our lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on residential real estate loans to 97% of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, with the condition that private mortgage insurance is required on loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%.

57


Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans include:
Evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments.
Evaluation of the value of the property securing the loan.
Ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed 28% of a borrower’s gross income.
Ensuring all debt servicing does not exceed 36% of income.
Verification of acceptable credit reports.
Verification of employment, income, and financial information.
Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed for appropriateness. All mortgage loan requests are reviewed by our mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market underwriting system; loans in excess of $500 require the approval of our Internal Loan Committee, the Executive Loan Committee, the Board of Directors’ Loan Committee, or the Board of Directors.
Consumer loans include secured and unsecured personal loans. Loans are amortized for a period of up to 12 years based on the age and value of the underlying collateral. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value. No consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.
The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when we believe the uncollectability of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL.
The appropriateness of the ALLL is evaluated on a quarterly basis and is based upon a periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the ALLL are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell. Historical loss allocations are calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio over the preceding five years. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A summary of changes in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:

Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2015$3,821
 $216
 $4,235
 $645
 $1,183
 $10,100
Charge-offs(89) (45) (397) (373) 
 (904)
Recoveries477
 72
 220
 206
 
 975
Provision for loan losses(2,038) 86
 (728) 44
 (135) (2,771)
December 31, 2015$2,171
 $329
 $3,330
 $522
 $1,048
 $7,400

58



Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2015
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$829
 $2
 $1,989
 $
 $
 $2,820
Collectively evaluated for impairment1,342
 327
 1,341
 522
 1,048
 4,580
Total$2,171
 $329
 $3,330
 $522
 $1,048
 $7,400
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$7,969
 $4,068
 $10,266
 $35
   $22,338
Collectively evaluated for impairment440,412
 111,843
 241,235
 34,664
   828,154
Total$448,381
 $115,911
 $251,501
 $34,699
   $850,492
 Allowance for Loan Losses
 Year Ended December 31, 2014

Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
January 1, 2014$6,048
 $434
 $3,845
 $639
 $534
 $11,500
Charge-offs(559) (31) (722) (316) 
 (1,628)
Recoveries550
 
 197
 149
 
 896
Provision for loan losses(2,218) (187) 915
 173
 649
 (668)
December 31, 2014$3,821
 $216
 $4,235
 $645
 $1,183
 $10,100

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans
 As of December 31, 2014
 Commercial Agricultural Residential Real Estate Consumer Unallocated Total
ALLL           
Individually evaluated for impairment$1,283
 $
 $2,143
 $1
 $
 $3,427
Collectively evaluated for impairment2,538
 216
 2,092
 644
 1,183
 6,673
Total$3,821
 $216
 $4,235
 $645
 $1,183
 $10,100
Loans           
Individually evaluated for impairment$12,029
 $1,595
 $12,160
 $64
   $25,848
Collectively evaluated for impairment421,241
 103,126
 253,995
 32,340
   810,702
Total$433,270
 $104,721
 $266,155
 $32,404
   $836,550

59


The following table displays the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit risk ratings as of December 31:
 2015
 Commercial Agricultural

Real Estate Other Total Real Estate Other Total
Rating           
1 - Excellent$
 $499
 $499
 $
 $
 $
2 - High quality7,397
 11,263
 18,660
 4,647
 2,150
 6,797
3 - High satisfactory99,136
 29,286
 128,422
 28,886
 13,039
 41,925
4 - Low satisfactory222,431
 62,987
 285,418
 37,279
 22,166
 59,445
5 - Special mention4,501
 473
 4,974
 3,961
 1,875
 5,836
6 - Substandard9,941
 256
 10,197
 1,623
 139
 1,762
7 - Vulnerable211
 
 211
 146
 
 146
8 - Doubtful
 
 
 
 
 
Total$343,617
 $104,764
 $448,381
 $76,542
 $39,369
 $115,911
 2014
 Commercial Agricultural

Real Estate Other Total Real Estate Other Total
Rating           
1 - Excellent$
 $492
 $492
 $
 $
 $
2 - High quality13,620
 14,423
 28,043
 5,806
 3,582
 9,388
3 - High satisfactory94,556
 51,230
 145,786
 28,715
 12,170
 40,885
4 - Low satisfactory184,000
 51,178
 235,178
 33,361
 17,560
 50,921
5 - Special mention8,456
 1,322
 9,778
 1,607
 65
 1,672
6 - Substandard11,055
 123
 11,178
 1,602
 147
 1,749
7 - Vulnerable2,687
 116
 2,803
 106
 
 106
8 - Doubtful
 12
 12
 
 
 
Total$314,374
 $118,896
 $433,270
 $71,197
 $33,524
 $104,721
Internally assigned credit risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned credit risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:
1. EXCELLENT – Substantially Risk Free
Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:
High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.
Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.
Experienced management, with management succession in place.
Secured by cash.
2. HIGH QUALITY – Limited Risk
Credit with sound financial condition and a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:
Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.
Ability to meet all obligations when due.
Management with successful track record.
Steady and satisfactory earnings history.
If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.
Access to alternative financing.
Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.
If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.

60


3.HIGH SATISFACTORY – Reasonable Risk
Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:
Working capital adequate to support operations.
Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.
Management experience and depth appear favorable.
Loan performing according to terms.
If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.
4. LOW SATISFACTORY – Acceptable Risk
Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:
Would include most start-up businesses.
Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency – may have been 10-30 days slow within the past year.
Management’s abilities are apparent, yet unproven.
Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.
Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.
If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.
Adequate cash flow to service debt, but coverage is low.
To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.
5. SPECIAL MENTION – Criticized
Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:
Downward trend in sales, profit levels, and margins.
Impaired working capital position.
Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.
Loan delinquency (30-60 days) and overdrafts may occur.
Shrinking equity cushion.
Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.
Management abilities are questionable.
Weak industry conditions.
Litigation pending against the borrower.
Collateral or guaranty offers limited protection.
Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.
6. SUBSTANDARD – Classified
Credit where the borrower’s current net worth, paying capacity, and value of the collateral pledged is inadequate. There is a distinct possibility that we will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:
Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.
Deteriorating liquidity.
Serious management problems or internal fraud.
Original repayment terms liberalized.
Likelihood of bankruptcy.
Inability to access other funding sources.
Reliance on secondary source of repayment.
Litigation filed against borrower.
Collateral provides little or no value.
Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.
Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.

61


7.VULNERABLE – Classified
Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing on nonaccrual status. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:
Insufficient cash flow to service debt.
Minimal or no payments being received.
Limited options available to avoid the collection process.
Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.
8. DOUBTFUL – Workout
Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:
Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.
Seriously impaired cash flow.
Original repayment terms materially altered.
Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.
Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.
Collection process has begun.
Bankruptcy petition has been filed.
Judgments have been filed.
Portion of the loan balance has been charged-off.
Our primary credit quality indicator for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the past due and current loans as of December 31:
 2015
 Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual  Current Total
Commercial             
Commercial real estate$505
 $281
 $
 $211
 $997
 $342,620
 $343,617
Commercial other18
 
 
 
 18
 104,746
 104,764
Total commercial523
 281
 
 211
 1,015
 447,366
 448,381
Agricultural             
Agricultural real estate196
 890
 
 146
 1,232
 75,310
 76,542
Agricultural other
 
 
 
 
 39,369
 39,369
Total agricultural196
 890
 
 146
 1,232
 114,679
 115,911
Residential real estate             
Senior liens1,551
 261
 
 429
 2,241
 199,622
 201,863
Junior liens40
 8
 
 6
 54
 9,325
 9,379
Home equity lines of credit225
 
 
 
 225
 40,034
 40,259
Total residential real estate1,816
 269
 
 435
 2,520
 248,981
 251,501
Consumer             
Secured27
 
 
 
 27
 30,839
 30,866
Unsecured4
 
 
 
 4
 3,829
 3,833
Total consumer31
 
 
 
 31
 34,668
 34,699
Total$2,566
 $1,440
 $
 $792
 $4,798
 $845,694
 $850,492

62


 2014
 Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual    

30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 Nonaccrual  Current Total
Commercial             
Commercial real estate$1,155
 $282
 $
 $2,764
 $4,201
 $310,173
 $314,374
Commercial other153
 24
 2
 116
 295
 118,601
 118,896
Total commercial1,308
 306
 2
 2,880
 4,496
 428,774
 433,270
Agricultural             
Agricultural real estate101
 
 
 106
 207
 70,990
 71,197
Agricultural other102
 
 
 
 102
 33,422
 33,524
Total agricultural203
 
 
 106
 309
 104,412
 104,721
Residential real estate             
Senior liens1,821
 425
 146
 668
 3,060
 211,698
 214,758
Junior liens235
 18
 
 130
 383
 10,750
 11,133
Home equity lines of credit468
 20
 
 250
 738
 39,526
 40,264
Total residential real estate2,524
 463
 146
 1,048
 4,181
 261,974
 266,155
Consumer             
Secured107
 2
 
 10
 119
 28,328
 28,447
Unsecured19
 
 
 
 19
 3,938
 3,957
Total consumer126
 2
 
 10
 138
 32,266
 32,404
Total$4,161
 $771
 $148
 $4,044
 $9,124
 $827,426
 $836,550
Impaired Loans
Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
1.
There has been a charge-off of its principal balance (in whole or in part);
2.
The loan has been classified as a TDR; or
3.
The loan is in nonaccrual status.
Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and agricultural loans by comparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for residential real estate and consumer loans by comparing the loan’s unpaid principal balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate.

63


We do not recognize interest income on impaired loans in nonaccrual status. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income is recognized daily, as earned, according to the terms of the loan agreement and the principal amount outstanding. The following summarizes information pertaining to impaired loans as of, and for the years ended, December 31:
 2015

Outstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate$5,659
 $5,777
 $818
 $7,221
 $376
Commercial other8
 8
 11
 362
 19
Agricultural real estate
 
 
 22
 1
Agricultural other335
 335
 2
 126
 8
Residential real estate senior liens9,996
 10,765
 1,959
 10,610
 425
Residential real estate junior liens143
 163
 30
 183
 16
Home equity lines of credit
 
 
 31
 
Consumer secured
 
 
 39
 3
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance16,141
 17,048
 2,820
 18,594
 848
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate2,122
 2,256
   2,170
 201
Commercial other180
 191
   106
 11
Agricultural real estate3,549
 3,549
   1,903
 95
Agricultural other184
 184
   290
 15
Home equity lines of credit127
 434
   144
 18
Consumer secured35
 35
   6
 1
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance6,197
 6,649
 

 4,619
 341
Impaired loans         
Commercial7,969
 8,232
 829
 9,859
 607
Agricultural4,068
 4,068
 2
 2,341
 119
Residential real estate10,266
 11,362
 1,989
 10,968
 459
Consumer35
 35
 
 45
 4
Total impaired loans$22,338
 $23,697
 $2,820
 $23,213
 $1,189

64


 2014

Outstanding Balance Unpaid Principal Balance Valuation Allowance Average Outstanding Balance Interest Income Recognized
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate$7,115
 $7,234
 $1,279
 $6,958
 $392
Commercial other609
 828
 4
 704
 51
Agricultural real estate
 
 
 85
 
Agricultural other
 
 
 
 
Residential real estate senior liens11,645
 12,782
 2,015
 12,713
 509
Residential real estate junior liens265
 275
 53
 133
 
Home equity lines of credit250
 650
 75
 229
 21
Consumer secured54
 54
 1
 68
 4
Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance19,938
 21,823
 3,427
 20,890
 977
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance         
Commercial real estate4,116
 4,462
   4,997
 309
Commercial other189
 212
   360
 17
Agricultural real estate1,529
 1,529
   1,455
 89
Agricultural other66
 186
   100
 30
Home equity lines of credit
 
   24
 
Consumer secured10
 10
   6
 
Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance5,910
 6,399
   6,942
 445
Impaired loans         
Commercial12,029
 12,736
 1,283
 13,019
 769
Agricultural1,595
 1,715
 
 1,640
 119
Residential real estate12,160
 13,707
 2,143
 13,099
 530
Consumer64
 64
 1
 74
 4
Total impaired loans$25,848
 $28,222
 $3,427
 $27,832
 $1,422
We had committed to advance $0 in connection with impaired loans, which include TDRs, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Loan modifications are considered to be TDRs when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.
Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:
1.Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.
2.Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for loans with similar risk characteristics.
3.Forgiving principal.
4.Forgiving accrued interest.
To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, factors we consider include:
1.The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.
2.The borrower would likely default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.
3.The borrower’s cash flow was insufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.
4.The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.
5.The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).

65


The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDRs granted in the years ended December 31:
 2015 2014

Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Post-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other13
 $3,073
 $3,073
 9
 $1,533
 $1,533
Agricultural other11
 3,106
 3,106
 1
 49
 49
Residential real estate           
Senior liens6
 678
 678
 15
 1,011
 1,011
Junior liens1
 30
 30
 4
 233
 233
Home equity lines of credit1
 94
 94
 1
 160
 160
Total residential real estate8
 802
 802
 20
 1,404
 1,404
Consumer unsecured
 
 
 4
 18
 18
Total32
 $6,981
 $6,981
 34
 $3,004
 $3,004
The following tables summarize concessions we granted to borrowers in financial difficulty in the years ended December 31:
 2015 2014

Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period Below Market Interest Rate Below Market Interest Rate and Extension of Amortization Period
 Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial other11
 $2,742
 2
 $331
 8
 $1,525
 1
 $8
Agricultural other9
 1,360
 2
 1,746
 
 
 1
 49
Residential real estate               
Senior liens3
 280
 3
 398
 3
 97
 12
 914
Junior liens
 
 1
 30
 2
 152
 2
 81
Home equity lines of credit
 
 1
 94
 1
 160
 
 
Total residential real estate3
 280
 5
 522
 6
 409
 14
 995
Consumer unsecured
 
 
 
 3
 15
 1
 3
Total23
 $4,382
 9
 $2,599
 17
 $1,949
 17
 $1,055
We did not restructure any loans by forgiving principal or accrued interest during 2015 or 2014.
Based on our historical loss experience, losses associated with TDRs are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the same loan segment. As such, TDRs, including TDRs that have been modified in the past 12 months that subsequently defaulted, are analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment.
Following is a summary of loans that defaulted in the years ended December 31, which were modified within 12 months prior to the default date:
 2015 2014

Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
 Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Number of Loans Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
 Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
Commercial other1
 $216
 $25
 $191
 
 $
 $
 $
Residential real estate junior liens1
 39
 39
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer unsecured
 
 
 
 2
 7
 7
 
Total2
 $255
 $64
 $191
 2
 $7
 $7
 $

66


The following is a summary of TDR loan balances as of December 31:
 2015 2014
TDRs$21,325
 $23,341
Note 6 – Premises and Equipment
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:

2015 20142018 2017
Land$6,190
 $5,429
$6,336
 $6,336
Buildings and improvements27,580
 25,441
30,100
 29,661
Furniture and equipment31,568
 31,011
34,825
 33,466
Total65,338
 61,881
71,261
 69,463
Less: accumulated depreciation37,007
 36,000
43,446
 41,013
Premises and equipment, net$28,331
 $25,881
$27,815
 $28,450
Depreciation expense amounted to $2,677, $2,551,$2,940, $2,902, and $2,556$2,821 in 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 2013,2016, respectively.
Note 6 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of goodwill was $48,282 at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Identifiable intangible assets were as follows as of December 31:
 2018
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,579
 $5,410
 $169
 2017
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,579
 $5,314
 $265
Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was $96, $119, and $162 in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable intangibles for each of the next five years succeeding December 31, 2018, and thereafter is as follows:

Estimated Amortization Expense
2019$71
202048
202129
202215
20232
Thereafter4
Total$169

Note 7 – Deposits
Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years, and thereafter, are as follows:

Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits
2019$232,349
202056,051
202165,036
202241,502
202331,714
Thereafter6,968
Total$433,620
Interest expense on time deposits greater than $250 was $1,280 in 2018, $825 in 2017 and $678 in 2016.
Note 8 – Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December 31:
 2018 2017

Amount Rate Amount Rate
FHLB advances$300,000
 2.20% $290,000
 1.94%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates40,299
 0.11% 54,878
 0.12%
Total$340,299
 1.95% $344,878
 1.65%
FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on all qualified 1-4 family residential real estate loans, specific AFS securities, and FHLB stock.
The following table lists the maturities and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances as of December 31:
 2018 2017

Amount Rate Amount Rate
Fixed rate due 2018$
 % $70,000
 1.96%
Fixed rate due 2019100,000
 1.94% 85,000
 1.87%
Fixed rate due 202055,000
 2.18% 35,000
 1.80%
Fixed rate due 202150,000
 1.91% 50,000
 1.91%
Variable rate due 2021 (1)
10,000
 2.93% 10,000
 1.72%
Fixed rate due 202220,000
 1.97% 20,000
 1.97%
Fixed rate due 202335,000
 3.17% 10,000
 3.90%
Fixed rate due 202420,000
 2.96% 
 %
Fixed rate due 202610,000
 1.17% 10,000
 1.17%
Total$300,000
 2.20% $290,000
 1.94%
(1) Hedged advance (see "Derivative Instruments" section below)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings and are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a fair value of $40,316 and $54,898 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Such securities remain under our control. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.

Securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount Window advances generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. The following tables provide a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount advances at December 31:
 2018 2017
 Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates$63,133
 $38,036
 0.10% $58,464
 $55,206
 0.13%
Federal funds purchased16,200
 3,741
 1.78% 5,965
 2,726
 1.15%
FRB Discount Window
 
 % 
 43
 1.54%
We had pledged AFS securities and 1-4 family residential real estate loans in the following amounts at December 31:

2018 2017
Pledged to secure borrowed funds$431,430
 $410,988
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements40,316
 54,898
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law58,107
 27,976
Total$529,853
 $493,862
AFS securities pledged to repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates consisted of the following at December 31:

2018 2017
States and political subdivisions$23,268
 $7,332
Mortgage-backed securities10,736
 13,199
Collateralized mortgage obligations6,312
 34,367
Total$40,316
 $54,898
AFS securities pledged to repurchase agreements are monitored to ensure the appropriate level is collateralized. In the event of maturities, calls, significant principal repayments, or significant decline in market values, we have an adequate level of AFS securities available to pledge to satisfy required collateral.
As of December 31, 2018, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $150,162, based on assets pledged as collateral. We had no investment securities that were restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.
Derivative Instruments
We enter into interest rate swaps to manage exposure to interest rate risk and variability in cash flows. The interest rate swaps, associated with our variable rate borrowings, are designated upon inception as cash flow hedges of forecasted interest payments. We enter into LIBOR-based interest rate swaps that involve the receipt of variable amounts in exchange for fixed rate payments, in effect converting variable rate debt to fixed rate debt.
Cash flow hedges are assessed for effectiveness using regression analysis. The effective portion of changes in fair value are recorded in OCI and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period in which the related interest on the variable rate borrowings affects earnings. In the event that a portion of the changes in fair value were determined to be ineffective, the ineffective amount would be recorded in earnings.
The following tables provide information on derivatives related to variable rate borrowings as of December 31:
 2018
 Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Life (Years) Notional Amount Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments           
Cash Flow Hedges:           
Interest rate swaps1.56% 3-Month LIBOR 2.3 $10,000
 Other Assets $323

 2017
 Pay Rate Receive Rate Remaining Life (Years) Notional Amount Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments           
Cash Flow Hedges:           
Interest rate swaps1.56% 3-Month LIBOR 3.3 $10,000
 Other Assets $291
Derivatives contain an element of credit risk which arises from the possibility that we will incur a loss as a result of a counterparty failing to meet its contractual obligations. Credit risk is minimized through counterparty collateral, transaction limits and monitoring procedures. We also manage dealer credit risk by entering into interest rate derivatives only with primary and highly rated counterparties, the use of ISDA master agreements, and the use of counterparty limits. We do not anticipate any losses from failure of interest rate derivative counterparties to honor their obligations.
Note 9 – Off-Balance-Sheet Activities, Commitments and Other Matters
Credit-Related Financial Instruments
We are party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into during the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and IRR in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in a particular class of financial instrument.
The following table summarizes our credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk as of December 31:

2018 2017
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit$199,652
 $184,317
Commercial and standby letters of credit1,723
 1,622
Commitments to grant loans13,225
 24,782
Total$214,600
 $210,721
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These commitments may expire without being drawn upon and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Advances to mortgage brokers are also included in unfunded commitments under lines of credit. The unfunded commitment is the difference between our outstanding balances and maximum outstanding aggregate amount.
Commitments to grant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer. Commitments to grant loans include residential mortgage loans that may be committed to be sold to the secondary market.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit generally mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. While we consider standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
Our exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit could be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in deciding to make these commitments as we do for extending loans to customers. No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.

Derivative Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. We enter into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A mortgage loan commitment binds us to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the rate lock.
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose us to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increase. The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock commitments was $1,088 and $805 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Forward Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, we utilize both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loan that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.
With a “mandatory delivery” contract, we commit to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If we fail to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, we are obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.
With a “best efforts” contract, we commit to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower).
We expect that these forward loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments. The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $1,089 and $1,843 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by management and, accordingly, are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.
Other Matters
Banking regulations require us to maintain cash reserve balances in currency or deposits with the FRB. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the reserve balances amounted to $1,220 and $1,458, respectively.
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation. At December 31, 2018, substantially all of the Bank’s assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Bank dividends are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current year’s retained net income plus retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to common stock. At January 1, 2019, the amount available to the Corporation for dividends from the Bank, without regulatory approval, was approximately $18,900.

Note 710Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsMinimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
The carrying amountCorporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the FRB and the FDIC that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures of goodwill was $48,282 at December 31, 2015assets, liabilities, capital, and $45,618 at December 31, 2014. Branch acquisitions during 2015 provided $2,664certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FRB and the FDIC about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of additional goodwill.
Identifiable intangibletotal capital, tier 1 capital, and common equity tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets were as follows(as defined) and tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). We believe, as of December 31:31, 2018 and 2017, that we met all capital adequacy requirements.
The FRB has established minimum risk-based capital guidelines. Pursuant to these guidelines, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The final rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules, which are being gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically.
Effective January 1, 2015, the minimum standard for primary, or tier 1, capital increased from 4.00% to 6.00%. The minimum standard for total capital remained at 8.00%. Also effective January 1, 2015 was the new common equity tier 1 capital ratio which had a minimum requirement of 4.50%. Beginning on January 1, 2016 the capital conservation buffer went into effect which will further increase the required levels each year through 2019.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the most recent notifications from the FRB and the FDIC categorized us as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, Common Equity Tier 1, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notifications that we believe have changed our categories. Our actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.
 2015
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,579
 $5,033
 $546
 2014
 Gross
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Intangible
Assets
Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions$5,373
 $4,863
 $510
Branch acquisitions
 Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2018           
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank$143,429
 11.75% $48,832
 6.375% $73,248
 6.50%
Consolidated154,705
 12.58% 49,212
 6.375%  N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank143,429
 11.75% 48,832
 7.875% 73,248
 8.00%
Consolidated154,705
 12.58% 49,212
 7.875%  N/A
 N/A
Total capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank151,804
 12.43% 97,664
 9.875% 122,080
 10.00%
Consolidated163,080
 13.26% 98,423
 9.875%  N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets           
Isabella Bank143,429
 8.07% 71,085
 4.00% 88,856
 5.00%
Consolidated154,705
 8.72% 70,996
 4.00%  N/A
 N/A

 Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2017           
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank$139,897
 11.56% $48,404
 5.750% $72,605
 6.50%
Consolidated149,013
 12.23% 48,744
 5.750%  N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank139,897
 11.56% 48,404
 7.250% 72,605
 8.00%
Consolidated149,013
 12.23% 48,744
 7.250%  N/A
 N/A
Total capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank147,597
 12.20% 96,807
 9.250% 121,009
 10.00%
Consolidated156,713
 12.86% 97,488
 9.250%  N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets           
Isabella Bank139,897
 8.07% 69,373
 4.000% 86,717
 5.00%
Consolidated149,013
 8.54% 69,827
 4.000%  N/A
 N/A
Note 11 – Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during 2015 resultedthe period. Diluted earnings per common share includes additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued relate solely to outstanding shares in $206the Directors Plan, see "Note 12 – Benefit Plans."
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:

2018 2017 2016
Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation7,872,077
 7,841,451
 7,813,739
Average potential effect of common shares in the Directors Plan (1)
200,771
 192,286
 185,611
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share8,072,848
 8,033,737
 7,999,350
Net income$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
Earnings per common share     
Basic$1.78
 $1.69
 $1.77
Diluted$1.74
 $1.65
 $1.73
(1) Exclusive of core deposit premiums. Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assetsshares held in the Rabbi Trust

Note 12 – Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
We have a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The plan was $169, $183, and $221amended in 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively.
Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable intangiblesto provide a matching safe harbor contribution for eachall eligible employees equal to 100% of the nextfirst 5.0% of an employee's compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor matching contributions.
For 2018, 2017 and 2016, expenses attributable to the Plan were $743, $713, and $686, respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective March 1, 2007. As a result of the curtailment, future salary increases are no longer considered (the projected benefit obligation is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation), and plan benefits are based on years of service and the individual employee’s five highest consecutive years succeeding December 31, 2015, and thereafter is as follows:

Estimated Amortization Expense
2016$163
2017119
201896
201971
202048
Thereafter49
Total$546

67


Note 8 – Foreclosed Assets
The following is a summarycompensation out of foreclosed assets asthe last ten years of December 31:
service through March 1, 2007.

2015 2014
Consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate foreclosed as a result of obtaining physical possession (1)$
 N/A
All other foreclosed assets421
 885
Total$421
 $885
(1)
Disclosure requirement from the adoption of ASU No. 2014-04 on January 1, 2015. As such, measurement was not applicable for December 31, 2014.
Changes in foreclosedthe projected benefit obligation and plan assets during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net amount recognized in our consolidated balance sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31, are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:

2018 2017
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation, January 1$11,381
 $11,448
Interest cost388
 444
Actuarial (gain) loss(1,194) 578
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(1,163) (1,089)
Benefit obligation, December 319,412
 11,381
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets, January 19,469
 9,325
Investment (loss) return(541) 1,033
Contributions
 200
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(1,163) (1,089)
Fair value of plan assets, December 317,765
 9,469
Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included on the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest payable and other liabilities$(1,647) $(1,912)

2018 2017
Change in accrued pension benefit costs   
Accrued benefit cost at January 1$(1,912) $(2,123)
Contributions
 200
Net periodic benefit cost(345) (412)
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost610
 423
Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31$(1,647) $(1,912)

2015 2014
Balance, January 1$885
 $1,412
Properties transferred1,158
 1,371
Impairments(99) (123)
Proceeds from sale(1,523) (1,775)
Balance, December 31$421
 $885
We have recorded the funded status of the plan in our consolidated balance sheets. We adjust the underfunded status in a liability account to reflect the current funded status of the plan. Any gains or losses that arise during the year but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
Consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate in the process of foreclosure were $56 as of December 31, 2015.
Note 9 – Deposits
Scheduled maturitiesThe components of time deposits for the next five years, and thereafter,net periodic benefit cost are as follows:

Scheduled Maturities of Time Deposits
2016$191,858
201789,932
201863,167
201923,883
202033,012
Thereafter21,028
Total$422,880
Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $2,806 in 2015, $2,920 in 2014 and $3,203 in 2013.
Note 10 – Borrowed Funds
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December 31:
 2015 2014

Amount Rate Amount Rate
FHLB advances$235,000
 1.93% $192,000
 2.05%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates70,532
 0.12% 95,070
 0.14%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates
 
 439
 3.25%
Federal funds purchased4,200
 0.75% 2,200
 0.50%
Total$309,732
 1.50% $289,709
 1.41%
FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on all qualified 1-4 family residential real estate loans, specific AFS securities, and FHLB stock.

68


The following table lists the maturities and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances as of December 31:
 2015 2014

Amount Rate Amount Rate
Fixed rate due 2015$
 
 $42,000
 0.72%
Fixed rate due 201630,000
 1.25% 10,000
 2.15%
Variable rate due 201615,000
 0.62% 
 
Fixed rate due 201750,000
 1.56% 30,000
 1.95%
Fixed rate due 201850,000
 2.16% 40,000
 2.35%
Fixed rate due 201940,000
 2.35% 20,000
 3.11%
Fixed rate due 202010,000
 1.98% 10,000
 1.98%
Fixed rate due 202130,000
 2.26% 30,000
 2.26%
Fixed rate due 202310,000
 3.90% 10,000
 3.90%
Total$235,000
 1.93% $192,000
 2.05%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings and are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The securities underlying the agreements have a carrying value and a fair value of $70,555 and $94,537 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Such securities remain under our control. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.
The following table lists the maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates at December 31:
 2015 2014
 Amount Rate Amount Rate
Repurchase agreements due 2015
  439
 3.25%
Total$
  $439
 3.25%
Securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount Window advances generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. The following table provides a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and FRB Discount Window advancesfollows for the years ended December 31:
 2015 2014
 Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period Maximum Month End Balance Average Balance Weighted Average Interest Rate During the Period
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates$84,859
 $70,368
 0.13% $95,070
 $91,422
 0.13%
Federal funds purchased13,100
 5,783
 0.50% 17,700
 4,589
 0.48%

2018 2017 2016
Interest cost on benefit obligation$388
 $444
 $485
Expected return on plan assets(554) (546) (560)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss242
 279
 313
Settlement loss269
 235
 
Net periodic benefit cost$345
 $412
 $238
We had pledged AFS securitiesDuring 2018, 2017 and 1-4 family residential real estate loans2016, additional settlement losses of $269, $235 and $0 were recognized in connection with lump-sum benefit distributions. Many plan participants elect to receive their retirement benefit payments in the following amountsform of lump-sum settlements. Pro rata settlement losses, which can occasionally occur as a result of these lump-sum distributions, are recognized only in years when the total of such distributions exceed the sum of the service and interest expense components of net periodic benefit cost.
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2018 includes net unrecognized pension costs before income taxes of $3,470, of which $140 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2019.
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the benefit obligation are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014
Pledged to secure borrowed funds$339,078
 $324,584
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements70,555
 94,537
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law39,038
 19,851
Total$448,671
 $438,972

2018 2017 2016
Discount rate4.11% 3.48% 3.96%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.00% 6.00% 6.00%

69


AFS securities pledged to repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates consisted ofThe actuarial weighted average assumptions used in determining the following atnet periodic pension costs are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014
States and political subdivisions$3,639
 $6,643
Mortgage-backed securities23,075
 29,655
Collateralized mortgage obligations43,841
 58,239
Total$70,555
 $94,537

2018 2017 2016
Discount rate3.48% 3.96% 4.13%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.
The expected long-term rate of return is an estimate of anticipated future long-term rates of return on plan assets as measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:
Historical long-term rates of return for broad asset classes.
Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
The general mix of assets held by the plan.
The stated investment policy for the plan.
The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment related expenses.
Pension Plan Assets
Our overall investment strategy is to moderately grow the portfolio by investing 50% of the portfolio in equity securities and 50% in fixed income securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long-term rate of return of 6.00%.  Equity securities primarily consist of the S&P 500 Index with a smaller allocation to the Small Cap and International Index.  Fixed income securities are invested in the Bond Market Index.  The Plan has appropriate assets invested in short-term investments to meet near term benefit payments.
The asset mix and the sector weighting of the investments are determined by our pension committee, which is comprised of members of our management. To manage the Plan, we retain a third party investment advisor to conduct consultations. We review the performance of the advisor at least annually.

The fair values of our pension plan assets by asset category were as follows as of December 31:
 2018 2017

Total (Level 2) Total (Level 2)
Short-term investments$98
 $98
 $300
 $300
Common collective trusts       
Fixed income2,924
 2,924
 3,815
 3,815
Equity investments4,743
 4,743
 5,354
 5,354
Total$7,765
 $7,765
 $9,469
 $9,469
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Short-term investments: Shares of a money market portfolio valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Common collective trusts: These investments are public investment securities valued using the NAV provided by a third party investment advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market.
We anticipate contributions to the Plan in 2019 to approximate net contribution costs.
The components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the year ending:

December 31, 2019
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$378
Expected return on plan assets(452)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss214
Net periodic benefit cost$140
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next ten years:
  Estimated Benefit Payments
2019 $450
2020 486
2021 479
2022 481
2023 481
2024 - 2028 2,540
Directors Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan, our directors are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into stock units of our common stock based on the fair value of a share of our common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock units credited to a participant’s account are eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares are purchased pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
Distribution of deferred fees from the Directors Plan occurs when the participant retires from the Board or upon the occurrence of certain other events. The participant is eligible to receive a distribution in the form of shares of our common stock of all of the stock units that are then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. We may use authorized but unissued shares or purchase shares of common stock on the open market to meet our obligations under the Directors Plan.
We maintain the Rabbi Trust to fund the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which we may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although we may not reach the

assets of the Rabbi Trust for any purpose other than meeting our obligations under the Directors Plan, the assets of the Rabbi Trust remain subject to the claims of our creditors and are included in the consolidated financial statements. We may contribute cash or common stock to the Rabbi Trust from time-to-time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust will use any cash that we contributed to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market through our Investment and Trust Services department. Shares held in the Rabbi Trust are included in the calculation of earnings per share.
The components of shares eligible to be issued under the Directors Plan were as follows as of December 31:

2018 2017
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
Unissued203,498
 $4,591
 195,140
 $5,513
Shares held in Rabbi Trust16,673
 376
 31,769
 897
Total220,171
 $4,967
 226,909
 $6,410
Stock Award Incentive Plan
We maintain an equity incentive plan for the purpose of promoting growth and profitability, as well as attracting and retaining executive officers of outstanding competence, through ownership of equity. Stock may be granted to specified individuals subject to certain conditions, and transfer of shares granted under the plan is restricted. Expenses related to this plan for 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $45, $38, and $70, respectively.
Other Employee Benefit Plans
We maintain nonqualified defined contribution retirement plans to provide supplemental retirement benefits to specified participants. Expenses related to these programs for 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $356, $473, and $440, respectively. Expenses are recognized over the participants’ expected years of service.
We maintained a non-leveraged ESOP which was frozen to new participants on December 31, 2006. Contributions to the plan were discretionary and were approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. We made no contributions to the ESOP in 2018, 2017 and 2016. Compensation costs related to the plan for 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $21, $23, and $33, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were 0, 166,833, and 204,669, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years. On December 21, 2016, the Board approved the termination of the ESOP effective December 31, 2016. Actual dissolution of the ESOP occurred in 2018.
We maintain a self-funded medical plan under which we are responsible for the first $75 per year of claims made by a covered family. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and our experience. Expenses were $2,695 in 2018, $2,324 in 2017 and $2,150 in 2016.
Note 13 – Revenue
Our revenue is comprised primarily of interest income, service charges and fees, gains on the sale of loans and AFS securities pledged, earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies, and other noninterest income. Other noninterest income is typically service and performance driven in nature and comprised primarily of investment and trust advisory fees. We recognize revenue, excluding interest income, in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers. Revenue is recognized when our performance obligation has been satisfied according to repurchase agreementsour contractual obligation.
We record receivables when revenue is unpaid and collectability is reasonably assured. Accounts receivable balances primarily represent amounts due from customers for which revenue has been recognized. Accounts receivable balances are monitoredrecorded in the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest receivable and other assets. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 we satisfied our performance obligations pursuant to ensure the appropriate level is collateralized. In the event of maturities, calls, significant principal repayments, or significant decline in market values,contracts with customers. As a result, we have adequate levels of available AFS securities to pledge to satisfy required collateral.
As of not recorded any contract assets or liabilities. We estimate no returns or allowances for the years ended December 31, 2015, we had the ability2018, 2017 and 2016.
Our contracts with customers define our performance obligations with clearly established pricing which did not require us to borrow up to an additional $121,960, based on assets pledged as collateral. We had no investment securities that are restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.
Note 11 – Other Noninterest Expenses
allocate or disaggregate revenue by performance obligation. A summary of expenses included in other revenue recognized for each major category of

noninterest expensescontracts with customers, subject to ASC 606, is as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Director fees$827
 $775
 $819
Audit and related fees821
 809
 738
FDIC insurance premiums813
 842
 1,082
Donations and community relations808
 1,004
 715
Marketing costs491
 427
 416
Legal fees464
 320
 359
Education and travel442
 625
 502
Printing and supplies405
 367
 396
Postage and freight377
 397
 387
Consulting fees364
 349
 315
Loan underwriting fees347
 361
 423
State taxes218
 171
 140
Amortization of deposit premium169
 183
 221
Other losses150
 250
 109
Foreclosed asset and collection53
 122
 211
All other1,661
 1,628
 1,517
Total other$8,410
 $8,630
 $8,350

2018 2017 2016
Debit card income$2,487
 $2,435
 $2,131
Trust service fees2,134
 1,928
 2,089
Investment advisory fees702
 679
 616
Service charges and fees related to deposit accounts332
 343
 349
Total$5,655
 $5,385
 $5,185
A large portion of our revenue consists of interest income which is not subject to the requirements set forth in ASC 606. This recently adopted guidance required us to review our other noninterest revenue sources within the scope of the guidance to ensure appropriate recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. This review process did not identify significant changes related to revenue recognition. As such, we did not record or disclose transactions related to the adoption of this guidance.
Note 1214Other Noninterest Expenses
A summary of expenses included in other noninterest expenses is as follows for the years ended December 31:

2018 2017 2016
Audit, consulting, and legal fees$2,263
 $2,043
 $1,952
ATM and debit card fees1,036
 1,181
 887
Loan underwriting fees1,016
 556
 535
Director fees858
 856
 851
FDIC insurance premiums726
 642
 719
Donations and community relations710
 657
 582
Marketing costs596
 568
 586
OTTI on AFS securities
 
 770
All other3,558
 3,541
 3,343
Total other$10,763
 $10,044
 $10,225
Note 15 – Federal Income Taxes
Components of the consolidated provision for federal income taxes are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Currently payable$1,596
 $2,159
 $3,404
$1,088
 $180
 $2,630
Deferred expense (benefit)1,692
 185
 (1,208)275
 2,836
 (282)
Income tax expense$3,288
 $2,344
 $2,196
$1,363
 $3,016
 $2,348


70

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted. The law established a flat corporate federal statutory income tax rate of 21% and eliminated the corporate alternative minimum tax which can be carried forward and used to reduce future income tax. The tax law provided for a wide array of changes, only some of which had a direct impact on our federal income tax expense. Some of these changes included, but are not limited to, the following items: limits to the deduction for net interest expense; immediate expense (for tax purposes) for certain qualified depreciable assets; elimination or reduction of certain deductions related to meals and entertainment expenses; and limits to the deductibility of deposit insurance premiums.
In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the effect of income tax law changes on deferred taxes are recognized as a component of income tax expense related to continuing operations in the period in which the law was enacted. As such, federal income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects the effect of the tax rate change on net deferred tax assets and liabilities. This requirement also applies to items initially recognized in other comprehensive income. In January 2018,

FASB issued ASU 2018-02 which allowed for the "stranded" tax effects in AOCI to be reclassified to retained earnings rather than income tax expense. We early adopted this guidance and applied this accounting alternative in our consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity as of December 31, 2017.
The reconciliation of the provision for federal income taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate of 34% of income before federal income tax expense is as follows for the year ended December 31:

2015 2014 20132018 2017 2016
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate$6,262
 $5,463
 $5,000
Income taxes at statutory rate (21% in 2018 and 34% in 2017 and 2016)$3,231
 $5,526
 $5,490
Effect of nontaxable income          
Interest income on tax exempt municipal securities(2,026) (1,999) (1,746)(1,106) (1,889) (1,938)
Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies(262) (255) (249)(148) (247) (419)
Deferred tax adjustment resulting from the statutory rate reduction pursuant to the Tax Act
 319
 
Other(88) (263) (154)231
 34
 (154)
Total effect of nontaxable income(2,376) (2,517) (2,149)(1,023) (1,783) (2,511)
Effect of nondeductible expenses157
 156
 146
113
 149
 143
Effect of tax credits(755) (758) (801)(958) (876) (774)
Federal income tax expense$3,288
 $2,344
 $2,196
$1,363
 $3,016
 $2,348
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for federal income tax purposes. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, measured at the 21% statutory rate, included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:

2015 20142018 2017
Deferred tax assets      
Allowance for loan losses$1,582
 $2,507
$1,304
 $1,076
Deferred directors’ fees2,549
 2,414
1,667
 1,758
Employee benefit plans229
 255
81
 70
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses1,098
 1,037
752
 733
Net unrecognized actuarial losses on pension plan1,708
 1,962
729
 857
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities1,211
 
Life insurance death benefit payable804
 804
497
 497
Alternative minimum tax650
 650
710
 1,463
Other53
 564
716
 607
Total deferred tax assets8,673
 10,193
7,667
 7,061
Deferred tax liabilities      
Prepaid pension cost890
 989
383
 455
Premises and equipment166
 247
1,548
 1,728
Accretion on securities55
 49
41
 40
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses1,289
 1,229
946
 909
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities2,252
 2,339

 204
Net unrealized gains on derivative instruments68
 61
Other989
 449
1,696
 1,684
Total deferred tax liabilities5,641
 5,302
4,682
 5,081
Net deferred tax assets$3,032
 $4,891
$2,985
 $1,980
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax; however, we are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2012.2015. There are no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months.

We recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. We do not have any amounts accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 and we are not aware of any claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.

71


Note 13 – Off-Balance-Sheet Activities
Credit-Related Financial Instruments
We are party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and IRR in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in a particular class of financial instrument.
 December 31
 2015 2014
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit$134,412
 $116,935
Commercial and standby letters of credit915
 4,985
Commitments to grant loans53,946
 13,988
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These commitments may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. While we consider standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to grant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer. Commitments to grant loans include loans committed to be sold to the secondary market.
Our exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit could be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in deciding to make these commitments as we do for extending loans to customers. No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.
Note 14 – On-Balance Sheet Activities
Derivative Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. We enter into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A mortgage loan commitment binds us to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the rate lock.
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose us to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increase. The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock commitments was $234 and $632 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Forward Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, we utilize both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loan that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.

72


With a “mandatory delivery” contract, we commit to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If we fail to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, we are obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.
With a “best efforts” contract, we commit to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower).
We expect that these forward loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments. The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $1,421 and $1,533 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by management and, accordingly, are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements.
Note 15 – Commitments and Other Matters
Banking regulations require us to maintain cash reserve balances in currency or as deposits with the FRB. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the reserve balances amounted to $1,169 and $963, respectively.
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation. At December 31, 2015, substantially all of the Bank’s assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Consequently, Bank dividends are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current year’s retained net income plus retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to common stock. At January 1, 2015, the amount available to the Corporation for dividends from the Bank, without regulatory approval, was approximately $24,700.
Note 16 – Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB and the FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the FRB and the FDIC that if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, capital, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FRB and the FDIC about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total, tier 1 capital, and common equity tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). We believe, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, that we met all capital adequacy requirements.
The FRB has established minimum risk based capital guidelines. Pursuant to these guidelines, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. On July 2, 2013, the FRB published revised BASEL III Capital standards for banks. The final rules redefine what is included or deducted from equity capital, changes risk weighting for certain on and off-balance sheet assets, increases the minimum required equity capital to be considered well capitalized, and introduces a capital cushion buffer. The rules, which are being gradually phased in between 2015 and 2019, are not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation but will require us to hold more capital than we have historically.

Effective January 1, 2015, the minimum standard for primary, or tier 1, capital increased from 4.00% to 6.00%. The minimum standard for total capital remains at 8.00%. Also effective January 1, 2015 is the new common equity tier 1 capital ratio which has a minimum requirement of 4.50%.

73


As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the most recent notifications from the FRB and the FDIC categorized us as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, Common Equity Tier 1, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notifications that we believe have changed our categories. Our actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.
 Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2015           
Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank$124,917
 12.31% $40,589
 4.50% $60,883
 6.50%
Consolidated135,250
 13.24% 40,886
 4.50% N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank124,917
 12.31% 40,589
 6.00% 60,883
 8.00%
Consolidated135,250
 13.24% 40,886
 6.00% N/A
 N/A
Total capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank132,317
 13.04% 81,178
 8.00% 101,472
 10.00%
Consolidated142,650
 13.96% 81,772
 8.00% N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets           
Isabella Bank124,917
 7.93% 63,032
 4.00% 78,790
 5.00%
Consolidated135,250
 8.52% 63,524
 4.00% N/A
 N/A
 Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
December 31, 2014           
Total capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank$128,074
 14.18% $72,278
 8.00% $90,348
 10.00%
Consolidated138,820
 15.19% 73,108
 8.00% N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets           
Isabella Bank117,974
 13.06% 36,139
 4.00% 54,209
 6.00%
Consolidated128,720
 14.08% 36,554
 4.00% N/A
 N/A
Tier 1 capital to average assets           
Isabella Bank117,974
 7.96% 59,297
 4.00% 74,121
 5.00%
Consolidated128,720
 8.59% 59,908
 4.00% N/A
 N/A

74


Note 17 – Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
We have a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 100% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The plan was amended in 2013 to provide a matching safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees equal to 100% of the first 5.0% of an employee's compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor matching contributions.
For 2012, we made a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees were 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and were 0% vested through their first two years of employment and were 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching contributions.
For 2015, 2014 and 2013, expenses attributable to the Plan were $664, $655, and $608, respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan, which was curtailed effective March 1, 2007. As a result of the curtailment, future salary increases are no longer considered (the projected benefit obligation is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation), and plan benefits are based on years of service and the individual employee’s five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service through March 1, 2007.
Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net amount recognized in our consolidated balance sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31, are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:

2015 2014
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation, January 1$13,250
 $10,732
Interest cost494
 486
Actuarial (gain) loss(744) 3,049
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(1,023) (1,017)
Benefit obligation, December 3111,977
 13,250
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets, January 110,390
 10,508
Investment return5
 699
Contributions200
 200
Benefits paid, including plan expenses(1,023) (1,017)
Fair value of plan assets, December 319,572
 10,390
Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included on the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest payable and other liabilities$(2,405) $(2,860)

2015 2014
Change in accrued pension benefit costs   
Accrued benefit cost at January 1$(2,860) $(224)
Contributions200
 200
Net periodic benefit cost(492) (300)
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost747
 (2,536)
Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31$(2,405) $(2,860)

75


We have recorded the funded status of the Plan in our consolidated balance sheets. We adjust the underfunded status in a liability account to reflect the current funded status of the plan. Our liability increased in 2014 as a result of changes in mortality tables and discount rates used to determine the current benefit obligation. Any gains or losses that arise during the year but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Interest cost on benefit obligation$494
 $486
 $450
Expected return on plan assets(607) (615) (572)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss355
 169
 330
Settlement loss250
 260
 
Net periodic benefit cost$492
 $300
 $208
During 2015 and 2014, additional settlement loss of $250 and $260 were recognized in connection with lump-sum benefits distributions. Many plan participants elect to receive their retirement benefit payments in the form of lump-sum settlements. Pro rata settlement losses, which can occasionally occur as a result of these lump sum distributions, are recognized only in years when the total of such distributions exceed the sum of the service and interest expense components of net periodic benefit cost.
Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2015 includes net unrecognized pension costs before income taxes of $5,022, of which $238 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2016.
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the benefit obligation are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Discount rate4.13% 3.80% 4.64%
Expected long-term rate of return6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
The actuarial weighted average assumptions used in determining the net periodic pension costs are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2015 2014 2013
Discount rate3.80% 4.64% 3.75%
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.
The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of anticipated future long term rates of return on plan assets as measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:
Historical long term rates of return for broad asset classes.
Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
The general mix of assets held by the plan.
The stated investment policy for the plan.
The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment related expenses.
Plan Assets
Our overall investment strategy is to moderately grow the portfolio by investing 50% of the portfolio in equity securities and 50% in fixed income securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long term rate of return of 6.00%.  Equity securities primarily consist of the S&P 500 Index with a smaller allocation to the Small Cap and International Index.  Fixed income securities are invested in the Bond Market Index.  The Plan has appropriate assets invested in short term investments to meet near-term benefit payments.
The asset mix and the sector weighting of the investments are determined by our pension committee, which is comprised of members of our management. To manage the Plan, we retain a third party investment advisor to conduct consultations. We review the performance of the advisor at least annually.

76


The fair values of our pension plan assets by asset category were as follows as of December 31:
 2015 2014

Total (Level 2) Total (Level 2)
Short-term investments$157
 $157
 $804
 $804
Common collective trusts       
Fixed income4,662
 4,662
 4,738
 4,738
Equity investments4,753
 4,753
 4,848
 4,848
Total$9,572
 $9,572
 $10,390
 $10,390
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2015 and 2014:
Short-term investments: Shares of a money market portfolio, which is valued using amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Common collective trusts: These investments are public investment securities valued using the NAV provided by a third party investment advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market.
We anticipate contributions to the Plan in 2016 to approximate net contribution costs.
The components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the year ending:

December 31, 2016
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation$484
Expected return on plan assets(559)
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss313
Net periodic benefit cost$238
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next ten years:
  Estimated Benefit Payments
2016 $500
2017 527
2018 529
2019 570
2020 614
2021 - 2025 3,290
Equity Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan, our directors are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of our common stock based on the fair value of a share of common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a participant’s account is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares are purchased on a monthly basis pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
Distribution of deferred fees from the Directors Plan occurs when the participant retires from the Board or upon the occurrence of certain other events. The participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution of all of the stock that is then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. We may use authorized but unissued shares or purchase shares of common stock on the open market to meet our obligations under the Directors Plan.
We maintain the Rabbi Trust to fund the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which we may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although we may not reach the

77


assets of the Rabbi Trust for any purpose other than meeting our obligations under the Directors Plan, the assets of the Rabbi Trust remain subject to the claims of our creditors and are included in the consolidated financial statements. We may contribute cash or common stock to the Rabbi Trust from time-to-time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust will use any cash that we contributed to purchase shares of our common stock on the open market through our brokerage services department. Shares held in the Rabbi Trust are included in the calculation of earnings per share.
The components of shares eligible to be issued under the Directors Plan were as follows as of December 31:

2015 2014
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
 Eligible
Shares
 Market
Value
Unissued180,616
 $5,400
 173,435
 $3,902
Shares held in Rabbi Trust19,401
 580
 13,934
 314
Total200,017
 $5,980
 187,369
 $4,216
Other Employee Benefit Plans
We maintain two nonqualified supplementary employee retirement plans to provide supplemental retirement benefits to specified participants. Expenses related to these programs for 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $379, $372, and $375, respectively, and are being recognized over the participants’ expected years of service.
We maintain a non-leveraged ESOP which was frozen to new participants on December 31, 2006. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and are approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. We made no contributions to the ESOP in 2015, 2014 and 2013. Compensation cost related to the plan for 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $32, $23, and $29, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 were 217,064, 241,958, and 241,958, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years.
We maintain a self-funded medical plan under which we are responsible for the first $75 per year of claims made by a covered family. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and our experience. Expenses were $1,695 in 2015, $1,786 in 2014 and $2,698 in 2013.

78


Note 18 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
AOCI includes net income as well as unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on AFS investment securities owned and derivative instruments, as well as changes in the funded status of our defined benefit pension plan, which are excluded from net income.plan. Unrealized AFS securities gains and losses and changes in the funded status of the pension plan, net of tax, are excluded from net income, and are reflected as a direct charge or credit to shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive income (loss) and the related components are disclosed in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The following table summarizesprovides a roll-forward of the changes in AOCI by component for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (net of tax):

Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
 Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost on Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
 TotalUnrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) on
AFS
Securities
 Unrealized
Gains
(Losses) on Derivative Instruments
 Change in Unrecognized Pension Cost on Defined
Benefit
Pension Plan
 Total
Balance, January 1, 2013$8,678
 $(3,671) $5,007
Balance, January 1, 2016$3,536
 $
 $(3,315) $221
OCI before reclassifications(18,971) 2,120
 (16,851)(5,865) 248
 282
 (5,335)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(171) 208
 37
525
 
 238
 763
Subtotal(19,142) 2,328
 (16,814)(5,340) 248
 520
 (4,572)
Tax effect6,257
 (791) 5,466
1,834
 (84) (177) 1,573
OCI, net of tax(12,885) 1,537
 (11,348)(3,506) 164
 343
 (2,999)
Balance, December 31, 2013(4,207) (2,134) (6,341)
Balance, December 31, 201630
 164
 (2,972) (2,778)
OCI before reclassifications11,290
 (2,836) 8,454
289
 43
 11
 343
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(97) 300
 203
(142) 
 412
 270
Subtotal11,193
 (2,536) 8,657
147
 43
 423
 613
Tax effect(3,684) 862
 (2,822)89
 (15) (144) (70)
OCI, net of tax7,509
 (1,674) 5,835
236
 28
 279
 543
Balance, December 31, 20143,302
 (3,808) (506)
One-time non-cash tax rate adjustment due to the Tax Act125
 38
 (530) (367)
Balance, December 31, 2017391
 230
 (3,223) (2,602)
OCI before reclassifications310
 255
 565
(7,229) 33
 265
 (6,931)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI(163) 492
 329

 
 345
 345
Subtotal147
 747
 894
(7,229) 33
 610
 (6,586)
Tax effect87
 (254) (167)1,415
 (7) (128) 1,280
OCI, net of tax234
 493
 727
(5,814) 26
 482
 (5,306)
Balance, December 31, 2015$3,536
 $(3,315) $221
Adoption of ASU 2016-01223
 
 
 223
Balance, December 31, 2018$(5,200) $256
 $(2,741) $(7,685)
Included in OCI for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 and 20142018 are changes in unrealized holding gains and losses related to auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks. ForThese investments, for federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments. As such,have no deferred federal income taxes related to unrealized holding gains or losses are expected or recorded.

79

In accordance with the Tax Act, the effect of income tax law changes on deferred taxes also applies to items recognized in other comprehensive income. In January 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-02 which allowed for the "stranded" tax effects in AOCI to be reclassified to retained earnings rather than income tax expense. We early adopted this guidance and applied this accounting alternative in our consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity as of December 31, 2017.

A summary of the components of unrealized holding gains on AFS securities included in OCI follows for the years ended December 31:
 2018 2017 2016

Auction Rate Money Market Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities Total
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period$(495) $(6,734) $(7,229) $407
 $(118) $289
 $54
 $(5,919) $(5,865)
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income
 
 
 
 (142) (142) 
 (245) (245)
Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 770
 770
Net unrealized gains (losses)(495) (6,734) (7,229) 407
 (260) 147
 54
 (5,394) (5,340)
Tax effect (1)

 1,415
 1,415
 
 89
 89
 
 1,834
 1,834
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax$(495) $(5,319) $(5,814) $407
 $(171) $236
 $54
 $(3,560) $(3,506)
 2015 2014 2013

Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS Securities Total Auction Rate Money Market Preferred and Preferred Stocks All Other AFS securities Total
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period$406
 $(96) $310
 $355
 $10,935
 $11,290
 $(737) $(18,234) $(18,971)
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses included in net income
 (163) (163) 
 (97) (97) 
 (171) (171)
Net unrealized gains (losses)406
 (259) 147
 355
 10,838
 11,193
 (737) (18,405) (19,142)
Tax effect
 87
 87
 
 (3,684) (3,684) 
 6,257
 6,257
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax$406
 $(172) $234
 $355
 $7,154
 $7,509
 $(737) $(12,148) $(12,885)
(1) Calculations are based on a federal income tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 34% in 2017 and 2016.
The following table details reclassification adjustments and the related affected line items in our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31:
Details about AOCI componentsAmount
Reclassified from
AOCI
 Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated
Statements of Income

2018 2017 2016  
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS securities       
 $
 $142
 $245
 Net gains on sale of AFS securities
 
 
 (770) Other noninterest expenses
 
 142
 (525) Income before federal income tax expense
 
 48
 (179) 
Federal income tax expense (benefit) (1)
 $
 $94
 $(346) Net income
        
Change in unrecognized pension cost on defined benefit pension plan       
 $345
 $412
 $238
 Other noninterest expenses
 72
 140
 81
 
Federal income tax expense (1)
 $273
 $272
 $157
 Net income
(1) Calculations are based on a federal income tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 34% in 2017 and 2016.

Note 17 – Fair Value
Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative guidance, we group assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the prioritization of inputs in the valuation techniques. These levels are:
Details about AOCI componentsAmount
Reclassified from
AOCI
 Affected Line Item in the
Consolidated
Statements of Income

2015 2014 2013  
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on AFS securities       
 $163
 $97
 $171
 Net gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities
 55
 33
 58
 Federal income tax expense
 $108
 $64
 $113
 Net income
        
Change in unrecognized pension cost on defined benefit pension plan       
 $492
 $300
 $208
 Compensation and benefits
 167
 102
 71
 Federal income tax expense
 $325
 $198
 $137
 Net income
Level 1:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2:Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3:Valuation is generated from model based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Transfers between measurement levels are recognized at the end of reporting periods.
Fair value measurement requires the use of an exit price notion which may differ from entrance pricing. Generally we believe our assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 or Level 2 approximate an exit price notion.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies, key inputs, and an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.
AFS securities: AFS securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, we compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.
Equity securities, at fair value: Equity securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. The values for Level 1 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, we compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.

Loans: We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time-to-time, loans are classified as impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will be significantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, we measure the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.
80We review the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types.  To determine the collateral value, we utilize independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations.  We review these valuations to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. We use these valuations to determine if any specific reserves or charge-offs are necessary. We may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or if the existing valuation is deemed to be outdated.

The following tables list the quantitative fair value information about impaired loans as of:

December 31, 2018
Valuation TechniqueFair ValueUnobservable Input Actual Range
  Discount applied to collateral:  
  Real Estate 20% - 30%
  Equipment 20% - 40%
  Cash crop inventory 30% - 40%
Discounted value$20,045Livestock 30%
  Other inventory 45% - 50%
  Accounts receivable 50%
  Liquor license 75%


Furniture, fixtures & equipment
35% - 45%

December 31, 2017
Valuation TechniqueFair ValueUnobservable Input Actual Range
  Discount applied to collateral:  
  Real Estate 20% - 30%
  Equipment 20% - 35%
  Cash crop inventory 30% - 40%
Discounted value$15,956Livestock 30%
  Other inventory 50% - 75%
  Accounts receivable 50%
  Liquor license 75%
  Furniture, fixtures & equipment 35% - 45%

Collateral discount rates may have ranges to accommodate differences in the age of the independent appraisal, broker price opinion, or internal evaluation.
Derivative instruments: Derivative instruments, consisting solely of interest rate swaps, are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, when highly effective, are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in value recorded in OCI. Should the hedge no longer be considered effective, the ineffective portion of the change in fair value is recorded directly in earnings in the period in which the change occurs. The fair value of a derivative is determined by quoted market prices and model-based valuation techniques. As such, we classify derivative instruments as Level 2.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differs from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis were as follows as of December 31:
 2018

Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$73,471
 $73,471
 $73,471
 $
 $
Mortgage loans AFS358
 365
 
 365
 
Gross loans1,128,707
 1,099,645
 
 
 1,099,645
Less allowance for loan and lease losses8,375
 8,375
 
 
 8,375
Net loans1,120,332
 1,091,270
 
 
 1,091,270
Accrued interest receivable6,928
 6,928
 6,928
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)
24,948
 N/A
 
 
 
OMSR2,434
 2,602
 
 2,602
 
LIABILITIES  
      
Deposits without stated maturities859,073
 859,073
 859,073
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities433,620
 425,993
 
 425,993
 
Borrowed funds340,299
 333,829
 
 333,829
 
Accrued interest payable826
 826
 826
 
 
 2017
 Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$30,848
 $30,848
 $30,848
 $
 $
Mortgage loans AFS1,560
 1,587
 
 1,587
 
Gross loans1,091,519
 1,056,906
 
 
 1,056,906
Less allowance for loan and lease losses7,700
 7,700
 
 
 7,700
Net loans1,083,819
 1,049,206
 
 
 1,049,206
Accrued interest receivable7,063
 7,063
 7,063
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)
23,454
 N/A
 
 
 
OMSR2,409
 2,409
 
 2,409
 
LIABILITIES         
Deposits without stated maturities811,992
 811,992
 811,992
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities453,266
 443,892
 
 443,892
 
Borrowed funds344,878
 342,089
 
 342,089
 
Accrued interest payable680
 680
 680
 
 
(1) Due to the characteristics of equity securities without readily determinable fair values, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, such amount would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment.

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
 2018 2017

Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Recurring items               
AFS securities               
Government-sponsored enterprises$170
 $
 $170
 $
 $216
 $
 $216
 $
States and political subdivisions190,866
 
 190,866
 
 208,474
 
 208,474
 
Auction rate money market preferred2,554
 
 2,554
 
 3,049
 
 3,049
 
Mortgage-backed securities184,484
 
 184,484
 
 208,797
 
 208,797
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations116,760
 
 116,760
 
 128,194
 
 128,194
 
Total AFS securities494,834
 
 494,834
 
 548,730
 
 548,730
 
Equity securities
 
 
 
 3,577
 3,577
 
 
Derivative instruments323
 
 323
 
 291
 
 291
 
Nonrecurring items               
Impaired loans (net of the ALLL)20,045
 
 
 20,045
 15,956
 
 
 15,956
Total$515,202
 $
 $495,157
 $20,045
 $568,554
 $3,577
 $549,021
 $15,956
Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value  % 96.11% 3.89%   0.63% 96.56% 2.81%
Equity securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through earnings on a recurring basis. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a loss of $41 through earnings. We had no other assets or liabilities recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through earnings, on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis, as of December 31, 2018.

Note 1918 – Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, we grant loans to principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including their families and companies in which they have 10% or more ownership). Annual activity consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:

2015 20142018 2017
Balance, January 1$3,822
 $4,178
$4,335
 $3,946
New loans2,779
 1,475
1,184
 3,895
Repayments(2,580) (1,831)(2,176) (3,506)
Balance, December 31$4,021
 $3,822
$3,343
 $4,335
Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and their affiliates amounted to $5,625$5,029 and $5,861$5,671 at December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. In addition, the ESOP held deposits with the Bank aggregating $143 and $392, respectively,$266 at December 31, 2015 and 2014.2017. No deposits were held as of December 31, 2018 due to the dissolution of the ESOP during 2018.
From time-to-time, we make charitable donations to theThe Isabella Bank & Trust Foundation (the “Foundation”), which is an affiliateda non-controlled nonprofit entityorganization formed for the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient organizations generally located in the communities we service.serve. Our donations are expensed when committed to the Foundation. The assets and transactions of the Foundation are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
Assets of the Foundation include cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, and shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock. The Foundation owned 44,350 and 34,350 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share.

We did not make donations to the Foundation for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The following table displays total asset balances of and our donations to, the Foundation as of, and for the years ended, December 31:
 2015 2014 2013
Total assets$2,435
 $2,090
 $1,815
Donations$258
 $500
 $200
Note 20 – Fair Value
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies, key inputs, and an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and demand deposits due from banks and interest bearing balances due from banks approximate fair values. As such, we classify cash and cash equivalents as Level 1.
AFS securities: AFS securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, we compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.
Mortgage loans AFS:Mortgage loans AFS are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of Mortgage loans AFS are based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, we classify Mortgage loans AFS subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Loans: For variable rate loans with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. As such, we classify loans as Level 3 assets.
We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time-to-time, loans are classified as impaired and a specific allowance for loan loss may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will be significantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is

81


identified as impaired, we measure the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.
We review the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types.  To determine the collateral value, we utilize independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations.  We review these valuations to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. We use these valuations to determine if any specific reserves or charge-offs are necessary. We may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or if the existing valuation is deemed to be outdated.
The following tables list the quantitative fair value information about impaired loans as of December 31:

2015
Valuation TechniqueFair ValueUnobservable Input Range
  Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  
  Real Estate 20% - 30%
  Equipment 20% - 35%
Discounted appraisal value$9,301Cash crop inventory 40%
  Other inventory 50%
  Accounts receivable 50%
  Liquor license 75%
  Furniture, fixtures & equipment 35% - 45%

2014
Valuation TechniqueFair ValueUnobservable Input Range
  Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  
  Real Estate 20% - 25%
  Equipment 30% - 40%
Discounted appraisal value$8,720Cash crop inventory 40%
  Other inventory 75%
  Accounts receivable 50%
  Liquor license 75%
Discount factors with ranges
 2018 2017 2016
Total assets$1,731
 $2,162
 $2,213
Note 19 – Operating Segments
Our reportable segments are based on the agelegal entities that account for at least 10% of net operating results. The operations of the independent appraisal, broker price opinion,Bank as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 represent approximately 90% or internal evaluation.
Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amountsmore of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value.our consolidated total assets and operating results. As such, we classify accrued interest receivable as Level 1.no additional segment reporting is presented.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values: Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are FHLB stock and FRB stock as well as our ownership interests in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC and Valley Financial Corporation. The investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, a title insurance company, was made in the first quarter 2008 and we account for our investment under the equity method of accounting. Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a community bank that opened in 2005. We made investments in Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007 and we account for our investment under the equity method of accounting.
The lack of an active market, or other independent sources to validate fair value estimates coupled with the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. As the fair values of these investments are not readily determinable, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy; however, they are reviewed quarterly for impairment. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, it would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment. During 2015 and 2014, there were no impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.

82


Foreclosed assets: Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets (which are included in other assets) are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Net realizable value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. Due to the inherent level of estimation in the valuation process, we classify foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 3.
The table below lists the quantitative fair value information related to foreclosed assets as of:
 December 31, 2015
Valuation TechniqueFair Value Unobservable Input Range
   Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  
Discounted appraisal value$421
 Real Estate 20% - 30%
 December 31, 2014
Valuation TechniqueFair Value Unobservable Input Range
   Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  
Discounted appraisal value$885
 Real Estate 20% - 25%
Discount factors with ranges are based on the age of the independent appraisal, broker price opinion, or internal evaluations.
Goodwill and other intangible assets: Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of acquisition intangibles or goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired, we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. If the testing resulted in impairment, we would classify goodwill and other acquisition intangibles subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. During 2015 and 2014, there were no impairments recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangibles.
OMSR:OMSR (which are included in other assets) are subject to impairment testing. To test for impairment, we utilize a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and discount rates. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, OMSR are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, we classify OMSR subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Deposits: The fair value of demand, savings, and money market deposits are equal to their carrying amounts and are classified as Level 1. Fair values for variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. As such, fixed rate certificates of deposit are classified as Level 2.
Borrowed funds: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. The fair values of other borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on current incremental borrowing arrangements. As such, borrowed funds are classified as Level 2.
Accrued interest payable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest payable approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest payable as Level 1.
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed loans: Our commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and undisbursed funds have no carrying amount and are estimated to have no realizable fair value. Historically, a majority of the unused commitments to extend credit have not been drawn upon and, generally, we do not receive fees in connection with these commitments other than standby letter of credit fees, which are not significant.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

83


Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis were as follows as of December 31:
 2015

Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$21,569
 $21,569
 $21,569
 $
 $
Mortgage loans AFS1,187
 1,210
 
 1,210
 
Gross loans850,492
 839,398
 
 
 839,398
Less allowance for loan and lease losses7,400
 7,400
 
 
 7,400
Net loans843,092
 831,998
 
 
 831,998
Accrued interest receivable6,269
 6,269
 6,269
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)22,286
 N/A
 
 
 
OMSR2,505
 2,518
 
 2,518
 
LIABILITIES  
      
Deposits without stated maturities741,683
 741,683
 741,683
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities422,880
 421,429
 
 421,429
 
Borrowed funds309,732
 297,495
 
 297,495
 
Accrued interest payable545
 545
 545
 
 
 2014
 Carrying
Value
 Estimated
Fair Value
 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
ASSETS         
Cash and cash equivalents$19,906
 $19,906
 $19,906
 $
 $
Mortgage loans AFS901
 911
 
 911
 
Gross loans836,550
 830,417
 
 
 830,417
Less allowance for loan and lease losses10,100
 10,100
 
 
 10,100
Net loans826,450
 820,317
 
 
 820,317
Accrued interest receivable5,851
 5,851
 5,851
 
 
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values (1)20,076
 N/A
 
 
 
OMSR2,519
 2,554
 
 2,554
 
LIABILITIES         
Deposits without stated maturities634,222
 634,222
 634,222
 
 
Deposits with stated maturities440,262
 440,964
 
 440,964
 
Borrowed funds289,709
 293,401
 
 293,401
 
Accrued interest payable558
 558
 558
 
 
(1)
Due to the characteristics of equity securities without readily determinable fair values, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, such amount would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment.

84


Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
 2015 2014

Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Recurring items               
AFS securities               
Government-sponsored enterprises$24,345
 $
 $24,345
 $
 $24,136
 $
 $24,136
 $
States and political subdivisions232,217
 
 232,217
 
 215,345
 
 215,345
 
Auction rate money market preferred2,866
 
 2,866
 
 2,619
 
 2,619
 
Preferred stocks3,299
 3,299
 
 
 6,140
 6,140
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities263,384
 
 263,384
 
 166,926
 
 166,926
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations134,025
 
 134,025
 
 152,368
 
 152,368
 
Total AFS securities660,136
 3,299
 656,837
 
 567,534
 6,140
 561,394
 
Nonrecurring items               
Impaired loans (net of the ALLL)9,301
 
 
 9,301
 8,720
 
 
 8,720
Foreclosed assets421
 
 
 421
 885
 
 
 885
Total$669,858
 $3,299
 $656,837
 $9,722
 $577,139
 $6,140
 $561,394
 $9,605
Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value  0.49% 98.06% 1.45%   1.06% 97.27% 1.67%
The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, for which gains or losses were recognized through earnings on a nonrecurring basis, in the years ended December 31:
 2015 2014
Nonrecurring items   
Foreclosed assets$(99) $(123)
We had no assets or liabilities recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recognized through earnings, on a recurring basis, as of December 31, 2015.

85


Note 21 – Parent Company Only Financial Information
Condensed Balance Sheets
 December 31

2015 2014
ASSETS   
Cash on deposit at the Bank$4,125
 $1,035
AFS securities257
 3,294
Investments in subsidiaries133,883
 124,827
Premises and equipment2,014
 1,982
Other assets53,396
 53,228
TOTAL ASSETS$193,675
 $184,366
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Other liabilities$9,704
 $9,772
Shareholders' equity183,971
 174,594
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$193,675
 $184,366
Condensed Statements of Income
 Year Ended December 31

2015 2014 2013
Income     
Dividends from subsidiaries$8,000
 $7,000
 $7,000
Interest income78
 150
 161
Management fee and other6,331
 3,665
 2,146
Total income14,409
 10,815
 9,307
Expenses     
Compensation and benefits5,110
 3,688
 2,811
Occupancy and equipment1,634
 1,082
 476
Audit and related fees452
 404
 345
Other2,160
 1,395
 958
Total expenses9,356
 6,569
 4,590
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries5,053
 4,246
 4,717
Federal income tax benefit991
 940
 790
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries6,044
 5,186
 5,507
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries9,086
 8,538
 7,003
Net income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510


86


Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 Year Ended December 31

2015 2014 2013
Operating activities     
Net income$15,130
 $13,724
 $12,510
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations     
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries(9,086) (8,538) (7,003)
Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values(310) 37
 74
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan550
 495
 554
Depreciation154
 144
 174
Net amortization of AFS securities
 1
 2
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)131
 (159) (305)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash     
Other assets506
 145
 (51)
Accrued interest and other liabilities142
 1,516
 1,238
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities7,217
 7,365
 7,193
Investing activities     
Maturities, calls, principal payments, and sales of AFS securities3,000
 250
 395
Purchases of premises and equipment(186) (81) (146)
Net (advances to) repayments from subsidiaries300
 641
 (299)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities3,114
 810
 (50)
Financing activities     
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds(211) (1,600) (1,350)
Cash dividends paid on common stock(7,273) (6,843) (6,456)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock5,201
 4,227
 3,618
Common stock repurchased(4,590) (3,122) (2,375)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations(368) (331) (383)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(7,241) (7,669) (6,946)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents3,090
 506
 197
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,035
 529
 332
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$4,125
 $1,035
 $529
Note 2220Operating SegmentsParent Company Only Financial Information
Our reportable segments are based on legal entities that account for at least Condensed Balance Sheets
 December 31

2018 2017
ASSETS   
Cash on deposit at the Bank$2,499
 $185
Investments in subsidiaries143,942
 145,962
Premises and equipment1,912
 1,950
Other assets51,674
 52,253
TOTAL ASSETS$200,027
 $200,350
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Other liabilities$4,508
 $5,445
Shareholders' equity195,519
 194,905
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$200,027
 $200,350
10%Condensed Statements of net operating results. The operationsIncome
 Year Ended December 31

2018 2017 2016
Income     
Dividends from subsidiaries$13,100
 $9,600
 $7,400
Interest income1
 2
 14
Management fee and other3,030
 6,463
 6,574
Total income16,131
 16,065
 13,988
Expenses     
Compensation and benefits4,132
 5,196
 4,898
Occupancy and equipment513
 1,779
 1,696
Audit and related fees368
 527
 536
Other1,615
 2,566
 2,120
Total expenses6,628
 10,068
 9,250
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries9,503
 5,997
 4,738
Federal income tax benefit749
 91
 1,058
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries10,252
 6,088
 5,796
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries3,769
 7,149
 8,003
Net income$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799


Condensed Statements of the Bank as of Cash FlowsDecember 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 represent approximately 90% or more of our consolidated total assets and operating results. As such, no additional segment reporting is presented.

87

 Year Ended December 31

2018 2017 2016
Operating activities     
Net income$14,021
 $13,237
 $13,799
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations     
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries(3,769) (7,149) (8,003)
Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values(144) 40
 791
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan612
 640
 573
Depreciation134
 154
 156
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)(31) 792
 147
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash     
Other assets1,237
 42
 (44)
Accrued interest and other liabilities(937) (1,590) (2,669)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities11,123
 6,166
 4,750
Investing activities     
Maturities, calls, principal payments, and sales of AFS securities
 249
 
Sales (purchases) of premises and equipment(96) (113) (133)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(96) 136
 (133)
Financing activities     
Net increase (decrease) in borrowed funds
 
 
Cash dividends paid on common stock(8,169) (7,990) (7,645)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock6,864
 6,177
 5,023
Common stock repurchased(7,007) (5,181) (4,440)
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations(401) (420) (383)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(8,713) (7,414) (7,445)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents2,314
 (1,112) (2,828)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period185
 1,297
 4,125
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$2,499
 $185
 $1,297

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 20152018, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20152018, were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
We also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20152018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, we have concluded that there have been no such changes during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.2018.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of our published consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, accordingly, include amounts based on judgments and estimates. We also prepared the other information included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K and are responsible for the accuracy and consistency with the consolidated financial statements.
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control over financial reporting, which is intended to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of our consolidated financial statements. The system includes but is not limited to:
A documented organizational structure and division of responsibility;
Established policies and procedures, including a code of conduct to foster a strong ethical climate which is communicated throughout our Corporation;
Internal auditors that monitor the operation of the internal control system and report findings and recommendations to management and the Audit Committee;
Procedures for taking action in response to an internal audit finding or recommendation;
Regular reviews of our consolidated financial statements by qualified individuals; and
The careful selection, training and development of our people.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Also, the effectiveness of an internal control system may change over time. We have implemented a system of internal control that was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
We have assessed our internal control system in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (2013 framework) of the Treadway Commission.
Based upon these criteria, we believe that, as of December 31, 2015,2018, our system of internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Rehmann Robson LLC ("Rehmann"), has audited our 20152018 consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2018. Rehmann was given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including minutes of all meetings of stockholders, the Board of Directors and committees of the Board. Rehmann has issued an unqualified audit opinion on our 20152018 consolidated financial

statements as a result of the integrated audit and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls as of December 31, 2015.2018.

88


Isabella Bank Corporation
By:
/s/ Jae A. Evans
Jae A. Evans
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 9, 201613, 2019
 
/s/ Dennis P. AngnerNeil M. McDonnell
Dennis P. AngnerNeil M. McDonnell
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)
March 9, 201613, 2019
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.

89


PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
For information concerning our directors and certain executive officers, see “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 3, 20167, 2019 (“Proxy Statement”) which is incorporated herein by reference.
For Information concerning our Audit Committee financial experts, see “Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance” in the Proxy Statement which is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We shall provide to any person without charge upon request, a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Written requests should be sent to: Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation, 401 North Main Street, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
For information concerning executive compensation, see “Executive Officers,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and “Remuneration of Directors” in the Proxy Statement which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
For information concerning the security ownership of certain owners and management, see “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement which is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2015,2018, with respect to compensation plans under which our common shares are authorized for issuance to directors, officers or employees in exchange for consideration in the form of goods or services.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights
(A)
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights
(B)
 Number of  Securities
Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (A))
(C)
Number of Securities
to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights
(A)
 Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights
(B)
 Number of  Securities
Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (A))
(C)
Equity compensation plans approved by
     
Shareholders: None
 
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders (1) (2):      
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
     
None
 
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders:      
Deferred director compensation plan(1)180,616
 (1)(2) (1)(2)203,498
(3) 
(5) 
(6)
Stock Award Incentive Plan (2)
4,122
(4) 
(5) 
(6)
Total180,616
     207,620
     
(1)Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan, our directors are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into stock units of our common stock based on the fair value of a share of our common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock units credited to a participant’s account are eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares are purchased pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
(1)Pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan, our directors are required to invest at least 25% of their board fees in our common stock. These stock investments can be made either through deferred fees or through the purchase of shares through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Deferred fees, under the Directors Plan, are converted on a quarterly basis into stock units of our common stock based on the fair value of a share of common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a participant’s account is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Dividend Reinvestment Plan shares are purchased on a monthly basis pursuant to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
Distribution of deferred fees from the Directors Plan occurs when the participant retires from the boardBoard or upon the occurrence of certain other events. The participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution in the form of shares of our common stock of all of the stock units that isare then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share basedshare-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. We may use authorized but unissued shares or purchase shares of common stock on the open market to meet our obligations under the Directors Plan.
(2) The Stock Award Incentive Plan is an equity-based bonus plan. Under the plan, we may award stock bonuses to the President and CEO, CFO and Bank President. The plan authorizes the issuance of vested stock to eligible employees worth up to 10% of the employee’s annualized base wages, on a calendar year basis. The plan imposes several conditions on the

issuance of stock awards and therefore, the stock awards are restricted. Awards are converted to shares upon payment to the participant based on the market value of our common stock on the date of award.
(3) As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Directors Plan had 200,017220,171 shares eligible to be distributed under the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust holds 16,673 shares for the benefit of participants pursuant to the Directors Plan.  Accordingly, such shares are not included in the number of securities issuable in column (A).

(4) This amount includes shares subject to outstanding incentive awards at the maximum amount of shares issuable under such awards.  However, payout of incentive awards is contingent on the individual and the Corporation reaching certain levels of performance during 2018.  If the performance criteria for these awards are not fully satisfied, the award recipient will receive less than the maximum number of shares eligible under these grants and may receive nothing from these grants. Additionally, this amount assumes the closing price of our common stock as of December 31, 2018 for purposes of the conversion from awards to stock.
90(5) The Directors Plan and the Stock Award Incentive Plan do not have an exercise price.
(6) There is no maximum number of shares available for issuance under the Directors Plan and the Stock Award Incentive Plan.


(2)The Rabbi Trust holds 19,401 shares for the benefit of participants pursuant to the Directors Plan.  Accordingly, such shares are not included in the number of securities issuable in column (A) or the weighted average price calculation in column (B), nor are potential future contributions included in column (C).
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
For information, see “Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management” and “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
For information concerning theour principal accountant fees and services see “Fees for Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson LLC” and “Pre-approval Policies and Procedures” in theour Proxy Statement which is incorporated herein by reference.

91


PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) (1)
Financial Statements:  The following documents are filed as part of Item 8 of this report:
    
   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   Consolidated Balance Sheets
   Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
   Consolidated Statements of Income
   Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    
  (2)
Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted because they are neither applicable nor required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
    
  (3)See the exhibits listed below under Item 15(b):
    
(b) The following exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed as part of this report:
    
  3(a)
Amended Articles of Incorporation (1)
  3(b)
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (2)
  3(c)
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (3)
  3(d)
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (4)
  3(e)
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (8)
  3(f)
Amended Bylaws (6)
  3(g)
Amendment to Bylaws (7)
  3(h)
Amendment to Bylaws (10)
  3(i)
Amendment to Bylaws (11)
  10(a)
Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors Directors* (9)*
  10(b)Amendment to
Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (12)*Split Dollar Plan* (13)
  10(c)
Isabella Bank Corporation Split Dollar Plan (13)*Retirement Bonus Plan* (12)
  10(d)
Isabella Bank Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Bonus Plan (9)*Plan* (14)
  10(e)
Amendment to the Isabella Bank Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (14)*Plan* (15)
  10(f)
Isabella Bank Corporation Stock Award Incentive Plan Plan* (15)*
  14
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (5)
  
  
  
  
  
  101.INSXBRL Interactive Data File**
  101.SCHXBRL Interactive Data File**
  101.CALXBRL Interactive Data File**
  101.LABXBRL Interactive Data File**
  101.PREXBRL Interactive Data File**
  101.DEFXBRL Interactive Data File**

92


* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
** As provided by Rule 406T in Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Exchange Act
(1)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, filed March 12, 1991, and incorporated herein by reference
(2)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1994, and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, filed March 22, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, filed March 27, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed April 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed November 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed May 16, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)
Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed March 13, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)
Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed August 28, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)
Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed December 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed August 28, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed August 30, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
(13)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed March 31, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
(14)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.
(15)
 Previously filed as an Exhibit to Isabella Bank Corporation Form 8-K, filed May 6, 2015,February 12, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference.

93

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
Table of ContentsNot applicable.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 16 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Jae A. Evans Date: March 9, 201613, 2019
  Jae A. Evans    
  President, Chief Executive Officer    
  (Principal Executive Officer)    
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures Capacity Date
     
/s/ Dennis P. Angner
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)
and Director
March 9, 2016
Dennis P. Angner
/s/ Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes    
     
/s/ Richard J. BarzJill Bourland Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Richard J. BarzJill Bourland    
     
/s/ Jae A. Evans President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer), and Director
 March 9, 201613, 2019
Jae A. Evans   
     
/s/ G. Charles Hubscher Director March 9, 201613, 2019
G. Charles Hubscher    
     
/s/ Thomas L. Kleinhardt Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Thomas L. Kleinhardt    
     
/s/ Joseph LaFramboise Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Joseph LaFramboise    
     
/s/ David J. Maness Director March 9, 201613, 2019
David J. Maness    
     
/s/ W. Joseph Manifold Director March 9, 201613, 2019
W. Joseph Manifold 
/s/ Neil M. McDonnellChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
March 13, 2019
Neil M. McDonnell   
     
/s/ W. Michael McGuire Director March 9, 201613, 2019
W. Michael McGuire    
     
/s/ Sarah R. Opperman Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Sarah R. Opperman
/s/ Jerome SchwindIsabella Bank President and DirectorMarch 13, 2019
Jerome Schwind
/s/ Rhonda S. TudorControllerMarch 13, 2019
Rhonda S. Tudor    
     
/s/ Gregory V. Varner Director March 9, 201613, 2019
Gregory V. Varner    

94