UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015

Commission file number 0-18051

DENNY'S CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	13-3487402
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer identification number)
203 East Main Street, Spartanburg, South Carolina	29319-9966
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(864) 597-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
$.01 Par Value, Common Stock	The Nasdaq Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer” and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	oþ	Accelerated filer	þo	Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $~~494.5~~842.1 million as of ~~June 25, 2014~~July 1, 2015, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock on that date of $~~6.60~~11.68 per share and, for purposes of this computation only, the assumption that all of the registrant’s directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of the registrant’s common stock are affiliates.

As of ~~March 11, 2015, 84,853,855~~February 24, 2016, 77,008,685 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference:

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	Page
PART I
Item 1. Business	1
Item 1A. Risk Factors	8
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	1314
Item 2. Properties	1314
Item 3. Legal Proceedings	1516
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	1516

PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	1517
Item 6. Selected Financial Data	1921
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1922
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3032
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	3133
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	3133
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures	3133
Item 9B. Other Information	3436

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	3436
Item 11. Executive Compensation	3436
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	3436
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	3436
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services	3436

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	3436

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements	F - 1

Signatures

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The forward-looking statements included in the “Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Legal Proceedings,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” sections and elsewhere herein, which reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known, involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as ~~“expects,~~“expect,” ~~“anticipates,~~“anticipate,” ~~“believes,~~“believe,” ~~“intends,~~“intend,” ~~“plans,~~“plan,” ~~“hopes,~~“hope,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements speak only as to the date thereof. Except as may be required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in such sections and, in particular, those set forth in the cautionary statements contained in “Risk Factors.” The forward-looking information we have provided in this Form 10-K pursuant to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 should be evaluated in the context of these factors.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Description of Business

Denny’s Corporation (Denny’s) is one of America’s largest franchised full-service restaurant ~~chains.~~chains based on the number of restaurants. Denny’s, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Denny’s, Inc., owns and operates the Denny’s brand. At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, the Denny’s brand consisted of ~~1,702~~1,710 franchised, licensed and company operated restaurants around the world with combined sales of ~~$2.6~~$2.7 billion, including ~~1,596~~1,599 restaurants in the United States and ~~106~~111 international locations. As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, ~~1,541~~1,546 of our restaurants were franchised or licensed, representing ~~91%~~90% of the total restaurants, and ~~161~~164 were company operated.

Denny’s is known as America's Diner, or in the case of our international locations, “the local diner.” Open 24/7 in most locations, we provide our guests quality food that emphasizes everyday value and new products through our compelling limited time only offerings, delivered in a warm, friendly “come as you are” atmosphere. Denny's has been serving guests for over 60 years and is best known for its breakfast fare, which is available around the clock. The Original Grand Slam, introduced in 1977, remains one of our most popular menu items. In addition to our breakfast-all-day items, Denny's offers a wide selection of lunch and dinner items including burgers, sandwiches, salads and skillet entrées, along with an assortment of beverages, appetizers and desserts.

In ~~2014,~~2015, Denny's average annual restaurant sales were ~~$2.1~~$2.2 million for company restaurants and ~~$1.5~~$1.6 million for franchised ~~restaurants (taking into consideration that 2014 was a 53 week year).~~restaurants. At our company restaurants, the guest check average was ~~$9.19~~$9.69 with an approximate average of ~~4,300~~4,400 guests served per week. Because our restaurants are open 24 hours, we have four dayparts (breakfast, lunch, dinner and late night), accounting for 24%, 35%, 22% and 19%, respectively, of average daily sales at company restaurants. Weekends have traditionally been the most popular time for guests to visit our restaurants. In ~~2014,~~2015, 36% of an average week of sales at company restaurants occurred between Friday late night and Sunday lunch.

References to "Denny's," the "Company," "we," "us," and "our" in this Form 10-K are references to Denny's Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Restaurant Development

Franchising

Our criteria to become a Denny’s franchisee include minimum liquidity and net worth requirements and appropriate operational experience. We believe that Denny’s is an attractive financial proposition for current and potential franchisees and that our fee structure is competitive with other full-service brands. Traditional twenty-year Denny’s franchise agreements have an initial fee of up to $40,000 and the royalty payment is up to 4.5% of gross sales. Additionally, our franchisees are required to contribute up to 3% of gross sales for brand promotion and may make additional advertising contributions as part of a local marketing co-operative. Franchise agreements for nontraditional locations, such as university campuses and military bases, may contain higher royalty and lower advertising contribution rates than the traditional franchise agreements. For ~~2014,~~2015, our average royalty rate was approximately ~~3.98%~~4.02%.

We work closely with our franchisees to plan and execute many aspects of the business. The Denny's Franchisee Association ("DFA") was created to promote communication among our franchisees and between the Company and our franchise community. DFA board members and Company management primarily work together through Brand Advisory Councils relating to Development, Marketing and Operations matters, as well as through a Supply Chain Oversight Committee for procurement and distribution matters.

Site Selection

The success of any restaurant is significantly influenced by its location. Our development team works closely with franchisees and real estate brokers to identify sites which meet specific standards. Sites are evaluated on the basis of a variety of factors, including but not limited to:

demographics;

traffic patterns;

visibility;

building constraints;

competition;

environmental restrictions; and

proximity to high-traffic consumer activities.

Domestic Development

To accelerate the growth of the brand in certain under-penetrated markets, we offer certain incentive programs. These programs provide significant incentives for franchisees to develop multiple locations in areas where Denny's does not have the top market share. The benefits to franchisees include reduced franchise fees, lower royalties for a limited time period and credits towards certain development services, such as ~~architecture and~~ training fees.

In recent years, we have opened restaurant locations within travel centers, primarily with Pilot and Pilot Flying J Travel Centers. At the end of 2015, we opened three new travel center restaurants in partnership with Kwik Trip^TM convenience stores. Additionally, we have opened nontraditional locations on university campuses and military bases operating under the Denny's Fresh Express®, Denny's AllNighter® or The Den® names.

Through our various development efforts, we currently have 77approximately 75 domestic franchised restaurants in our development pipeline. The majority of these restaurants are expected to open over the next five years. While we anticipate the majority of the restaurants to be opened under these agreements, generally as scheduled, from time to time some of our franchisees' ability to grow and meet their development commitments may be hampered by the economy, ~~and~~ the lending ~~environment.~~environment or other circumstances.

International Development

In addition to the development agreements signed for domestic restaurants, we have 71approximately 100 international franchised restaurants in our development pipeline. ~~This number~~The international pipeline includes ~~a franchise agreement we signed during 2014 for the development of 30 new Denny’s~~28 restaurants ~~in nine countries~~ in the Middle East, ~~over~~15 in Indonesia, 13 in Canada, ten in Turkey and ten in the ~~next ten years.~~Philippines. During ~~2014,~~2015, we opened ~~six~~eight franchised international locations, including ~~five~~four in Canada, two in the United Arab Emirates and ~~one~~two in the Dominican Republic.

During ~~2015,~~2016, we expect to open a total of 3540 to 45 franchised restaurants in domestic and international markets, resulting in ~~single digit~~ net ~~restaurant growth.~~growth of five to ten restaurants.

Franchise Focused Business Model

Through our development and refranchising efforts we have achieved a restaurant portfolio mix of ~~91%~~90% franchised and 9%10% company operated. ~~We expect that our percentage of company restaurants will gradually decrease.~~ The majority of our future restaurant openings and ~~the future~~ growth of the brand will come primarily from the development of franchised restaurants. The following table summarizes the changes in the number of company restaurants and franchised and licensed restaurants during the past five years (excluding relocations):


	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010		2015		2014		2013		2012		2011
Company restaurants, beginning of period	163		164		206		232		233		161		163		164		206		232
Units opened	1		—		1		8		24		3		1		—		1		8
Units acquired from franchisees	—		2		1		—		—		3		—		2		1		—
Units sold to franchisees	—		(2	)	(36	)	(30	)	(24	)	(1	)	—		(2	)	(36	)	(30	)
Units closed	(3	)	(1	)	(8	)	(4	)	(1	)	(2	)	(3	)	(1	)	(8	)	(4	)
End of period	161		163		164		206		232		164		161		163		164		206

Franchised and licensed restaurants, beginning of period	1,537		1,524		1,479		1,426		1,318		1,541		1,537		1,524		1,479		1,426
Units opened	37		46		39		53		112		42		37		46		39		53
Units purchased from Company	—		2		36		30		24		1		—		2		36		30
Units acquired by Company	—		(2	)	(1	)	—		—		(3	)	—		(2	)	(1	)	—
Units closed	(33	)	(33	)	(29	)	(30	)	(28	)	(35	)	(33	)	(33	)	(29	)	(30	)
End of period	1,541		1,537		1,524		1,479		1,426		1,546		1,541		1,537		1,524		1,479
Total restaurants, end of period	1,702		1,700		1,688		1,685		1,658		1,710		1,702		1,700		1,688		1,685

The table below sets forth information regarding the distribution of single-store and multi-store franchisees as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015:


	Franchisees	Percentage of Franchisees		Restaurants	Percentage of Restaurants		Franchisees	Percentage of Franchisees		Restaurants	Percentage of Restaurants
One	89	33.2	%	89	5.8	%	94	35.3	%	94	6.1	%
Two to five	114	42.6	%	341	22.1	%	105	39.5	%	308	19.9	%
Six to ten	29	10.8	%	223	14.5	%	28	10.5	%	214	13.8	%
Eleven to fifteen	10	3.7	%	123	8.0	%	14	5.3	%	176	11.4	%
Sixteen to thirty	18	6.7	%	370	24.0	%	16	6.0	%	325	21.0	%
Thirty-one and over	8	3.0	%	395	25.6	%	9	3.4	%	429	27.8	%
Total	268	100.0	%	1,541	100.0	%	266	100.0	%	1,546	100.0	%

Restaurant Operations

We believe that the ~~superior~~consistent and reliable execution of basic restaurant operations in each Denny’s restaurant, whether it is company or franchised, is critical to our success. To meet and exceed our guests’ expectations, we require both our company and our franchised restaurants to maintain the same strict brand standards. These standards relate to the preparation and efficient serving of quality food and the maintenance, repair and cleanliness of ~~restaurants.~~each restaurant.

We devote significant effort to ensuring all restaurants offer quality food served by friendly, knowledgeable and attentive employees in a clean and well-maintained restaurant. We seek to ensure that our company restaurants meet our high standards through a network of Directors of Company Operations, Company District Managers and restaurant level managers, all of whom spend the majority of their time in the restaurants. A network of Regional Directors of Franchise Operations and Franchise Business Leaders provide oversight of our franchised restaurants to ensure compliance with brand standards, promote operational excellence and provide general support to our franchisees.

A principal feature of our restaurant operations is the consistent focus on improving operations at the restaurant level. ~~Each~~Our Pride Review Program, executed by a team of coaches, is designed to continuously improve the execution of our brand standards and shift management at each company and franchised ~~restaurant receives regular reviews and coaching to assess and continually improve restaurant operations.~~restaurant. In addition, Denny’s maintains training programs for hourly employees and restaurant management. Hourly employee training programs (including eLearning) are position-specific and focus on skills and tasks necessary to successfully fulfill the responsibilities assigned to them, while continually enhancing guest satisfaction. Denny's Manager In Training (“MIT”) program provides managers with the knowledge and leadership skills needed to successfully operate a Denny's restaurant. The MIT program is required for all new ~~management hires and those promoted internally~~managers of company restaurants and is also available to Denny's franchisees to train their managers.

Product Development and Marketing

Menu Offerings

We are leveraging our heritage with our “America’s Diner" brand positioning, which provides the promise of Everyday Value with craveable, indulgent products served in a friendly and welcoming atmosphere. This positioning provides the framework for our four primary marketing strategies: (1) supporting our core "breakfast all day" platform, (2) delivering everyday affordability, primarily through our $2 $4 $6 $8 Value Menu®, (3) creating compelling limited-time-only products and (4) driving relevance beyond breakfast. The Denny’s menu offers a large selection of high-quality, moderately priced products designed to appeal to all types of guests. We offer a wide variety of items for breakfast, lunch, dinner and late night dining, in addition to appetizers, desserts and beverages. Our Fit Fare® menu helps our guests identify items best suited to their dietary needs. Most Denny’s restaurants offer special items for children and seniors at reduced prices. Our “America’s Diner" brand positioning, which provides the promise of Everyday Value with craveable, indulgent products served in a friendly and welcoming atmosphere, establishes the framework for our primary marketing strategies. These strategies focus on optimizing our product offering to further align with consumer needs, which includes enhancing our core "breakfast all day" platform while providing everyday affordability, primarily through our $2 $4 $6 $8 Value Menu® and delivering compelling limited-time-only products.

Product Development

Denny’s is a consumer-driven brand focusing on hospitality, menu choices and the overall guest experience. Our Product Development team works closely with consumer insights obtained through primary and secondary qualitative and quantitative studies. Input and ideas from our franchisees, vendors and operators are also integrated into this process. These insights form the strategic foundation for menu architecture, pricing, promotion and advertising. Before a new menu item can be brought to fruition, it is rigorously tested against consumer expectations, standards of culinary discipline, food science and technology, nutritional analysis, financial benefit and operational execution. This testing process ensures that new menu items are not only appealing, competitive, profitable and marketable, but can be prepared and delivered with excellence in our restaurants.

The added value of these insights and strategic understandings also assists our Restaurant Operations and Information Technology ~~staffs~~staff in the evaluation and development of new restaurant processes and upgraded restaurant equipment that may enhance our speed of service, food quality and order accuracy.

We continually evolve our menu through new additions, deletions or improvements to meet the needs of a changing consumer and market place.

Product Sources and Availability

Our ~~purchasing~~Purchasing department administers programs for the procurement of food and non-food products. Our franchisees also purchase food and non-food products directly from the vendors under these programs. Our centralized purchasing program is designed to ensure uniform product quality as well as to minimize food, beverage and supply costs. Our size provides significant purchasing power, which often enables us to obtain products at favorable prices from nationally recognized manufacturers.

While nearly all products used in our restaurants are contracted for by our ~~purchasing~~Purchasing department, the majority are purchased and distributed through Meadowbrook Meat Company ("MBM"), a wholly owned subsidiary of McLane Company, Inc., under a long-term distribution contract. MBM distributes restaurant products and supplies to the Denny’s system from approximately 200 vendors, representing approximately 90% of our restaurant product and supply purchases. We believe that satisfactory alternative sources of supply are generally available for all the items regularly used by our restaurants. We have not experienced any material shortages of food, equipment, or other products which are necessary to our restaurant operations.

Marketing and Advertising

~~Denny’s marketing~~Our Marketing team employs integrated marketing and advertising strategies that promote the Denny’s brand. Brand and communications strategy, advertising, broadcast media, social media, digital media, menu management, product innovation and development, consumer insights, target segment marketing, public relations, field marketing and national/local promotions and partnerships all fall under the marketing umbrella.

~~Our~~We focus our marketing campaigns ~~focus~~ on amplifying Denny's brand strengths as America's Diner, promoting the various breakfast, lunch, dinner, late night and Fit Fare® menu offerings in addition to both value and premium limited time only offerings. Denny's deploys comprehensive marketing strategies on a national level and through local co-operatives, targeting customers through network, cable and local television, radio, online, digital, social, outdoor and print media.

Brand Protection & Quality

Denny’s will only serve our guests food that is safe and wholesome and that meets our quality standards. Our systems, from "farm to fork," are based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points ("HACCP"), whereby we prevent, eliminate or reduce hazards to a safe level to protect the health of the employees and guests. To ensure this basic expectation toof our guests, Denny’s also has risk-based systems in place to validate only approved vendors and distributors which meet and follow our product specifications and food handling procedures. Vendors, distributors and restaurant employees follow regulatory requirements (federal, state and local), industry “best practices” and Denny’s Brand Standards.

We use multiple approaches to quality including third-party unannounced restaurant inspections (utilizing Denny’s Brand Protection Reviews), health department reviews and employee/manager training in their respective roles. It is a brand standard that all regulatory reviews/inspections be submitted to the Brand Protection department within 24 hours. We follow-up on all inspections received, and assist Operations and Facilities ~~and~~personnel, as well as franchisees, where applicable, to bring resolution to regulatory issues or concerns. If operational brand standard expectations are not met, a remediation process is immediately initiated. Our HACCP program uses nationally recognized food safety training courses and American National Standards Institute accredited certification programs.

All Denny’s restaurants are required to have a person certified in food protection on duty for all hours of operation. Our Food Safety/HACCP program has been recognized nationally by regulatory departments, the restaurant industry and our peers as one of the best. We continuously work toward improving our processes and procedures. We are advocates for the advancement of food safety within the industry’s organizations, such as the National Council of Chain Restaurants, the National Restaurant Association (NRA) and the NRA's Quality Assurance Executive Study Groups.

Seasonality

Restaurant sales are generally higher in the second and third calendar quarters (April through September) than in the first and fourth calendar quarters (October through March). Additionally, severe weather, storms and similar conditions may impact sales volumes seasonally in some operating regions.

Trademarks and Service Marks

Through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, we have certain trademarks and service marks registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in international jurisdictions, including "Denny's®", "Grand Slam®", "$2 $4 $6 $8 Value Menu®" and "Fit Fare®". We consider our trademarks and service marks important to the identification of our restaurants and believe they are of material importance to the conduct of our business. Domestic trademark and service mark registrations are renewable at various intervals from 10 to 20 years. International trademark and service mark registrations have various durations from 5 to 20 years. We generally intend to renew trademarks and service marks ~~which~~that come up for renewal. We own or have rights to all trademarks we believe are material to our restaurant operations in the United States and other jurisdictions where we do business. In addition, we have registered various domain names on the internet that incorporate certain of our trademarks and service marks, and believe these domain name registrations are an integral part of our identity. From time to time, we may resort to legal measures to defend and protect the use of our intellectual property.

Competition

The restaurant industry is highly competitive. Restaurants compete on the basis of name recognition and advertising; the price, quality, variety and perceived value of their food offerings; the quality and speed of their guest service; and the convenience and attractiveness of their facilities.

Denny’s direct competition in the full-service category includes a collection of national and regional chains, as well as thousands of independent operators. We also compete with quick service restaurants as they attempt to upgrade their menus with premium sandwiches, entrée salads, new breakfast offerings and extended hours.

We believe that Denny’s has a number of competitive strengths, including strong brand recognition, well-located restaurants and market penetration. We benefit from economies of scale in a variety of areas, including advertising, purchasing and distribution. Additionally, we believe that Denny’s has competitive strengths in the value, variety and quality of our food products, and in the quality and training of our employees. See “Risk Factors” for certain additional factors relating to our competition in the restaurant industry.

Economic, Market and Other Conditions

The restaurant industry is affected by many factors, including changes in national, regional and local economic conditions affecting consumer ~~spending,~~spending; the political environment (including acts of war and terrorism), changes in customer travel patterns including changes in the price of gasoline; changes in socio-demographic characteristics of areas where restaurants are ~~located,~~located; changes in consumer tastes and ~~preferences,~~preferences; food safety and health concerns; outbreaks of flu viruses (such as avian flu) or other diseases; increases in the number of ~~restaurants,~~restaurants; and unfavorable trends affecting restaurant operations, such as rising wage rates, ~~healthcare~~health care costs, utilities expenses and unfavorable weather. See "Risk Factors" for additional information.

Government Regulations

We and our franchisees are subject to local, state, federal and international laws and regulations governing various aspects of the restaurant business.

We are subject to Federal Trade Commission regulation and a number of state laws which regulate the offer and sale of franchises. We also are subject to a number of state laws which regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. We believe we are in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations, but we cannot predict the effect on operations of the enactment of additional regulations in the future.

We are also subject to federal and state laws, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, governing matters such as minimum wage, tip reporting, overtime, exempt status classification and other working conditions. A substantial number of our employees are paid the minimum wage. Accordingly, increases in the minimum wage or decreases in the allowable tip credit (which reduces wages deemed to be paid to tipped employees in certain states) increase our labor costs. This is especially true for our operations in California, where there is no tip credit. Employers must pay the higher of the federal or state minimum wage. We have attempted to offset increases in the minimum wage through pricing and various cost control ~~efforts;~~efforts, however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts in the future.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act required that most individuals obtain health insurance coverage beginning in 2014 and also required that certain large employers offer coverage to their employees or pay a financial penalty beginning in 2015. We began complying with the laws in 2014. Although we cannot predict with certainty the financial and operational impacts ~~the~~these laws will have on us in the future, we expect that our expenses related to employee health benefits will increase over the long term as a result of ~~this legislation.~~these laws. Any such increases could adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the health care ~~legislation~~reform laws will require restaurant companies such as ours to disclose calorie information on their menus effective December 1, ~~2015.~~2016. We doearly adopted this requirement during 2015 and did not ~~expect to~~ incur any material costs from compliance with this provision of the law.

Environmental Matters

Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations have not historically had a material impact on our operations; however, we cannot predict the effect of possible future environmental legislation or regulations on our operations.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth information with respect to each executive officer of both Denny’s Corporation and Denny's Inc.:



Name	Age	Positions
Christopher D. Bode	5253	Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

John W. Dillon	4344	Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer

Stephen C. Dunn	5051	Senior Vice President, Chief Global Development Officer

Timothy E. Flemming	5455	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer

John C. Miller	5960	Chief Executive Officer and President

Jill A. Van Pelt	4647	Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer

F. Mark Wolfinger	5960	Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Bode has been Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since October 2014. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Operations from January 2013 to October 2014, as Divisional Vice President, Franchise Operations from January 2012 to January 2013 and as Vice President, Operations Initiatives from March 2011 to January 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bode served as Chief Operating Officer of QSR Management, LLC (a franchisee of Dunkin’ Donuts) from 2008 to 2010.

Mr. Dillon has been Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer since October 2014. He previously served as Vice President, Brand and Field Marketing from June 2013 to October 2014 and as Vice President, Marketing from July 2008 to June 2013.

Mr. Dunn has been Senior Vice President, Chief Global Development Officer since ~~April 2011.~~July 2015. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Global Development from April 2011 to July 2015 and Vice President, Company and Franchise Development from September 2005 to April 2011.

Mr. Flemming has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer since March 2009. He previously served as Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer from June 2008 to March 2009.

Mr. Miller has been Chief Executive Officer and President since February 2011. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Taco Bueno Restaurants, Inc. (an operator and franchisor of quick service Mexican eateries) from 2005 to February 2011.

Ms. Van Pelt has been Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer since October 2014. She previously served as Vice President, Human Resources from October 2008 to October 2014.

Mr. Wolfinger has been Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since April 2008 and Chief Financial Officer since September 2005. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Growth Initiatives from October 2006 to April 2008.

Employees

At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, we had approximately ~~8,300~~8,500 employees, of whom ~~7,900~~8,100 were restaurant employees, 100 were field support employees and 300 were corporate personnel. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Many of our restaurant employees work part-time, and many are paid at or above minimum wage levels. As is characteristic of the restaurant industry, we experience a high level of turnover among our restaurant employees. We have experienced no significant work stoppages, and we consider relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

The staff for a typical restaurant consists of one General Manager, two or three Restaurant Managers and approximately 45 hourly employees. The Chief Operating Officer, along with the VP, ~~Company~~Franchise Operations, the VP, Training and the VP, ~~Franchise~~ Operations Services, establish the strategic direction and key initiatives for the Operations Teams. In addition, we employ two Directors of Company Operations, four Regional Directors of Franchise Operations and a team of Company District Managers and Franchise Business Leaders to guide and support the franchisees and in-restaurant teams. The duties of the Directors of Operations, District Managers and Franchise Business Leaders include regular restaurant visits and inspections, as well as frequent interactions with our franchisees, employees and guests, which ensure the ongoing adherence to our standards of quality, service, cleanliness, value and hospitality.

Available Information

We make available free of charge through our website at investor.dennys.com (in the Investor Relations—SEC Filings section) copies of materials that we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We caution you that our business and operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The occurrence of any of the events discussed in the following risk factors ~~listed below could cause actual~~may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, which may materially and adversely affect the value of our shares of common stock. It is not possible to ~~differ materially from~~predict or identify all risk factors. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our historical results and from projections in forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, in our other filings with the SEC, in our news releases and in public statements made orally by our representatives.business operations.

A decline in general economic conditions could adversely affect our financial results.

Consumer spending habits, including discretionary spending on dining at restaurants such as ours, are affected by many factors including:

prevailing economic ~~conditions;~~conditions, including interest rates;

energy costs, especially gasoline prices;

levels of employment;

salaries and wage rates, including tax rates;

consumer confidence; and

consumer perception of economic conditions.

Weakness or uncertainty regarding the United States economy, as a result of reactions to consumer credit availability, increasing energy prices, inflation, increasing interest rates, unemployment, war, terrorist activity or other unforeseen events could adversely affect consumer spending habits, which may result in lower restaurant sales.

~~Our financial condition depends on~~The restaurant business is highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete effectively, our ~~ability and the ability~~business will be adversely affected.

Each of our ~~franchisees~~restaurants competes with a wide variety of restaurants ranging from national and regional restaurant chains to ~~operate restaurants profitably,~~locally owned restaurants. We expect competition to ~~generate positive cash flows~~continue to increase. The following are important aspects of competition:

restaurant location;

advantageous commercial real estate suitable for restaurants;

number and location of competing restaurants;

attractiveness and repair and maintenance of facilities;

ability to ~~generate acceptable returns on invested capital.~~ develop and support evolving technology to deliver a consistent and compelling guest experience;

food quality, new product development and value;

dietary trends, including nutritional content;

training, courtesy and hospitality standards;

ability to attract and retain high quality staff;

quality and speed of service; and

the effectiveness of marketing and advertising programs.

The returns and profitability of our restaurants may be negatively impacted by a number of factors, including those described below.

Food service businesses are often materially and adversely affected by changes in:

consumer ~~tastes,~~preferences, including nutritional and dietary concerns;

consumer spending habits;

global, national, regional and local economic conditions; and

demographic trends.

The performance of our individual restaurants may be materially and adversely affected by factors such as:

traffic patterns;

demographic ~~considerations;~~trends; and

the type, number and location of competing restaurants.

Dependence on frequent deliveries of fresh produce and groceries subjects food service businesses to the risk that shortages or interruptions in supply caused by adverse weather or other conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of ingredients. In addition, the food service industry in general, and our results of operations and financial condition in particular, may be adversely affected by unfavorable trends or developments such as:

inflation;

volatility in certain commodity markets;

increased food costs;

health concerns arising from food safety issues and other food-related pandemics, outbreaks of flu viruses, such as avian flu, or other diseases;

increased energy costs;

labor and employee benefits costs (including increases in minimum hourly wage, employment tax rates, health care costs and workers’ compensation costs);

regional weather conditions; and

the availability of experienced management and hourly employees.

Operating results that are lower than our current estimates may cause us to incur impairment charges on certain long-lived assets and potentially close certain restaurants.

The financial performance of our franchisees can negatively impact our business.

As we are heavily franchised, our financial results are contingent upon the operational and financial success of our franchisees. We receive royalties, contributions to advertising and, in some cases, lease payments from our franchisees. We have established operational standards, guidelines and strategic plans for our franchisees; however, we have limited control over how our franchisees’ businesses are run. While we are responsible for ensuring the success of our entire chain of restaurants and for taking a longer term view with respect to system improvements, our franchisees have individual business strategies and objectives, which might conflict with our interests. Our franchisees may have business interests outside of their Denny’s restaurants, making them subject to business and financial risks unrelated to the operation of our restaurants. These unrelated risks could adversely affect a franchisee's ability to make payments to us or their ability to secure adequate financing to open or continue operating their Denny’s restaurants. If they incur too much debt or if economic or sales trends deteriorate such that they are unable to repay existing debt, it could result in financial distress or even bankruptcy. Our franchisees are impacted by the implementation of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act. If a significant number of franchisees become financially distressed, it could harm our operating results through reduced royalties and lease income.

For ~~2014,~~2015, our ten largest franchisees accounted for ~~32%~~29% of our franchise revenue. The balance of our franchise revenue is derived from the remaining ~~258~~256 franchisees. Although the loss of revenues from the closure of any one franchised restaurant may not be material, such revenues generate margins that may exceed those generated by other restaurants or offset fixed costs which we continue to incur.

We have guarantees related to certain franchisee leases and loans. Payments under these guarantees would result from the inability of a franchisee to fund required payments when due. Through December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, no events had occurred that caused us to make payments under the guarantees. There were ~~$9.8~~$8.7 million and ~~$6.1~~$9.8 million of loans outstanding under these programs as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, respectively. As of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, the maximum amounts payable under the lease guarantee and loan guarantees were $2.0 million and ~~$1.7~~$1.3 million, respectively.

Our growth strategy depends on our ability and that of our franchisees to open new restaurants. Delays or failures in opening new restaurants could adversely affect our planned growth.

The development of new restaurants may be adversely affected by risks such as:

costs and availability of capital for the company and/or franchisees;

competition for restaurant sites;

inability to identify suitable franchisees;

negotiation of favorable purchase or lease terms for restaurant sites;

inability to obtain all required governmental approvals and permits;

delays in completion of construction;

challenge of identifying, recruiting and training qualified restaurant managers;

developed restaurants not achieving the expected revenue or cash flow;

challenges specific to the growth of international operations and nontraditional restaurants that are different from traditional domestic development; and

general economic conditions.

The locations where we have restaurants may cease to be attractive as demographic patterns change.

The success of our owned and franchised restaurants is significantly influenced by location. Current locations may not continue to be attractive as demographic patterns change. It is possible that the neighborhood or economic conditions where our restaurants are located could decline in the future, potentially resulting in reduced sales at those locations.

Our expansion into international markets may present increased risks due to lower customer awareness of our brand, our unfamiliarity with those markets and other factors.

The international markets in which our franchisees currently operate and any additional markets our franchisees may enter outside of the United States, have many differences as compared to our domestic markets. There may be lower consumer familiarity with the Denny’s brand in these markets, as well as different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and economic, political and health conditions. Additionally, there are risks associated with sourcing quality ingredients and other commodities in a cost-effective and timely manner. As a result, our franchised international restaurants may take longer to reach expected sales and profit levels, and may never do so, thereby affecting the brand’s overall growth and profitability. Building brand awareness may take longer than expected, which could negatively impact our profitability in those markets.

We are subject to governmental regulations in our international markets impacting the way we do business with our international franchisees. These include antitrust and tax requirements, anti-boycott regulations, import/export/customs and other international trade regulations, the USA Patriot Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions, which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

~~The restaurant business is highly competitive,~~Failure of computer systems, information technology or cyber security could result in material harm to our reputation and ~~if we are unable~~business.

We and our franchisees rely on computer systems and information technology to ~~compete effectively,~~conduct our ~~business will be adversely affected.~~

~~Each~~business. A material failure or interruption of service or a breach in security of our computer systems caused by malware or other attack could cause reduced efficiency in operations, loss or misappropriation of data, or business interruptions, or could impact delivery of food to restaurants ~~competes with a wide variety of restaurants ranging from national~~or financial functions such as vendor payment or employee payroll. We have business continuity plans that attempt to anticipate and ~~regional restaurant chains to locally owned restaurants. We expect competition to continue to increase. The following are important aspects of competition:~~

~~restaurant location;~~

~~advantageous commercial real estate suitable for restaurants;~~

~~number and location of competing restaurants;~~

~~attractiveness and repair and maintenance of facilities;~~

~~food quality, new product development and value;~~

~~dietary trends, including nutritional content;~~

~~training, courtesy and hospitality standards;~~

~~ability to attract and retain high quality staff;~~

~~quality and speed of service; and~~

~~the effectiveness of marketing and advertising programs.~~

~~Our reputation and business~~mitigate such failures, but it is possible that significant capital investment could be ~~materially harmed as a result of~~required to rectify these problems, or more likely that cash flows could be impacted, in the ~~failure to protect the integrity and security of guest information or employees' personal data.~~shorter term.

We receive and maintain certain personal information about our guests, employees and ~~employees.~~franchisees. Our use of this information is regulated at the federal and state levels, as well as by certain third-party contracts. If our security and information systems are compromised ~~as a result of a cyber attack or any other failures or our business associates fail to comply with these laws and regulations~~ and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately, it could adversely affect our reputation, operations, results of operations and financial condition, and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties. As privacy and information security laws and regulations change or cyber risks evolve pertaining to this data, we may incur additional costs to ensure we remain in compliance.

Numerous government regulations impact our business, and our failure to comply with them could adversely affect our business.

We and our franchisees are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things:

preparation, labeling, advertising and sale of food;

sanitation and safety;

land use, sign restrictions and environmental matters;

employee health care requirements, including the implementation and uncertain legal, regulatory and cost implications of the health care reform law;

management and protection of the personnel data of our guests, employees and franchisees;

payment card regulation and related industry rules;

the sale of alcoholic beverages;

hiring and employment practices, including minimum wage and tip credit laws and fair labor standards; and

Americans with Disabilities Act.

The operation of our franchisee system is also subject to regulations enacted by a number of states and rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission. Due to our international franchising, we are ~~also~~ subject to governmental regulations throughout the world impacting the way we do business with our international franchisees. Additionally, given our significant concentration of restaurants in California, changes in regulations in that state could have a disproportionate impact on our operations. If we or our franchisees fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we or our franchisees could be subjected to restaurant closure, fines, penalties and litigation, which may be costly and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the future enactment of additional legislation regulating the franchise relationship could adversely affect our operations.

We ~~began complying with~~continue to evaluate the potential impacts of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act ~~in 2014.~~on our business, and accommodate various parts of the law and related rules and regulations as they take effect. Because of the breadth and complexity of ~~this legislation~~these laws and the phased-in nature of implementation, we cannot predict with certainty the financial and operational impacts the laws will have on ~~us.~~us in the future. However, we expect that our expenses related to employee health benefits will increase over the long term as a result of this ~~legislation.~~these laws. Any such increases could adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, the health care ~~legislation~~reform laws will require restaurant companies such as ours to disclose calorie information on their menus effective December 1, ~~2015.~~2016. We doearly adopted this requirement during 2015 and did not ~~expect to~~ incur any material costs from compliance with this provision of the ~~law, but~~law. We cannot anticipate the changes in guest behavior that could result from the implementation of this provision, which could have an adverse effect on our sales or results of operations.

We are also subject to federal, state and international laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. Such laws impose registration and disclosure requirements on franchisors in the offer and sale of franchises, and may contain provisions that supersede the terms of franchise agreements, including limitations on the ability of franchisors to terminate franchises and alter franchise arrangements.

Litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to the risk of, or are involved in from time to time, complaints or litigation brought by former, current or prospective employees, customers, franchisees, vendors, landlords, shareholders or others. We assess contingencies to determine the degree of probability and range of possible loss for potential accrual in our financial statements. An estimated loss contingency is accrued if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Because lawsuits are inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. We regularly review contingencies to determine the adequacy of the accruals and related disclosures. However, the amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates. A judgment that is not covered by insurance or that is significantly in excess of our insurance coverage for any claims could materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In

addition, regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are found to be liable, claims may be expensive to defend, and may divert management’s attention away from operations and hurt our performance. Further, adverse publicity resulting from claims may harm our business or that of our franchisees.

Food safety and quality concerns may negatively impact our business and profitability.

Incidents or reports of food- or water-borne illness, or other food safety issues, food contamination or tampering, employee hygiene and cleanliness failures, improper employee conduct, or presence of communicable disease at our restaurants or suppliers could lead to product liability or other claims. Such incidents or reports could negatively affect our brand and reputation and a decrease in customer traffic resulting from these reports could negatively impact our revenues and profits. Similar incidents or reports occurring at other restaurant brands unrelated to us could likewise create negative publicity, which could negatively impact consumer behavior towards us. In addition, if a regional or global health pandemic occurs, depending upon its location, duration and severity, our business could be severely affected.

We rely on our domestic and international vendors, as do our franchisees, to provide quality ingredients and to comply with applicable laws and industry standards. A failure of one of our domestic or international vendors to meet our quality standards, or meet domestic or international food industry standards, could result in a disruption in our supply chain and negatively impact our brand and our business and profitability. Our inability to manage an event such as a product recall or product related litigation could also cause our results to suffer.

Negative publicity generated by incidents at a few restaurants can adversely affect the operating results of our entire chain and the Denny’s brand.

Food safety concerns, health concerns, outbreaks of flu viruses (such as avian flu) or other diseases, criminal activity, alleged discrimination or other operating issues stemming from one restaurant or a limited number of restaurants do not just impact that particular restaurant or a limited number of restaurants. Rather, our entire chain of restaurants may be at risk from the negative publicity generated by an incident at a single restaurant. The increasing use of social media platforms has increased the speed and scope of adverse publicity and could hinder our ability to quickly and effectively respond to such reports. This negative publicity can adversely affect the operating results of our entire chain and the Denny’s brand.

If we ~~lose the services of any of our key management personnel,~~fail to recruit, develop and retain talented employees, our business could suffer.

Our future success significantly depends on the continued services and performance of our key management personnel. Our future performance will depend on our ability to attract, motivate and retain these and other key officers and key team members, particularly regional and area managers and restaurant general managers. Competition for these employees is intense.

If our internal controls are ineffective, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We maintain a documented system of internal controls which is reviewed and tested by the company’s full time Internal Audit ~~Department.~~department. The Internal Audit ~~Department~~department reports directly to the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. ~~We believe~~Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we ~~have~~would prevent or detect a ~~well-designed system to maintain adequate internal controls on the business; however, we cannot be certain that~~misstatement of our ~~controls will be adequate in the future or that adequate controls will be effective in preventing errors~~financial statements or fraud. Any ~~failures~~failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the ~~effectiveness~~market price of our ~~internal controls could have an adverse effect on our operating results or cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations.~~common stock.

As a holding company, Denny’s Corporation depends on upstream payments from its operating subsidiaries.

Almost all of our assets are owned, and all of our operating revenues are earned, by our subsidiaries, which are also the primary obligors for substantially all of the indebtedness, obligations and liabilities related to our business. Accordingly, our ability to repurchase shares of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock and to make any distributions to our shareholders depends on the performance of those subsidiaries and their ability to make distributions to Denny’s Corporation. Their ability to make such distributions may be subject to contractual and other restrictions.

Many factors, including those over which we have no control, affect the trading price of our common stock.

Factors such as reports on the economy or the price of commodities, as well as negative or positive announcements by competitors, regardless of whether the report directly relates to our business, could have an impact on the trading price of our common stock. In addition to investor expectations about our prospects, trading activity in our common stock can reflect the portfolio strategies and investment allocation changes of institutional holders, as well as non-operating initiatives such as our share repurchase ~~program.~~programs. Any failure to meet market expectations whether for same-store sales, restaurant unit growth, earnings per share or other metrics could cause our share price to decline.

Our indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.

As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, we had total indebtedness of $~~158.8~~215.7 million, including capital leases.

We continually monitor our cash flow and liquidity needs. Although we believe that our existing cash balances, funds from operations and amounts available under our credit facility will be adequate to cover those needs, we could seek additional sources of funds, including incurring additional debt and selling selected assets, to maintain sufficient cash flow to fund our ongoing operating needs, pay interest and scheduled debt amortization and fund anticipated capital expenditures over the next twelve months. We have no material debt maturities scheduled until ~~April 2018.~~March 2020. If we are unable to satisfy or refinance our current debt as it comes due, we may default on our debt obligations.

For additional information concerning our indebtedness see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources."

1213

Our debt instruments include restrictive covenants. These covenants may restrict or prohibit our ability to engage in or enter a variety of transactions. A breach of these covenants could cause acceleration of a significant portion of our outstanding indebtedness.

The credit agreement governing our indebtedness contains various covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to:

incur additional indebtedness;

pay dividends, repurchase shares of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock or make distributions or certain other restricted payments;

make certain investments;

create dividend or other payment restrictions affecting restricted subsidiaries;

issue or sell capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;

guarantee indebtedness;

enter into transactions with ~~stockholders~~shareholders or affiliates;

create liens;

sell assets and use the proceeds thereof;

engage in sale-leaseback transactions; and

enter into certain mergers and consolidations.

These covenants could have an adverse effect on our business by limiting our ability to take advantage of financing, merger, acquisition or other corporate opportunities and to fund our operations. If we incur additional debt in the future, covenant limitations on our activities (and risks associated with such increased debt levels generally) could increase.

Though we currently participate in a share repurchase program, such program is subject to restrictions under our credit agreement and there can be no assurance that we will repurchase our ~~Common Stock~~common stock pursuant to the program. Our credit agreement contains additional restrictive covenants, including financial maintenance requirements. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, such as uncertainties related to the current economy, and we cannot be sure that we will be able to comply with these covenants.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default under any of our debt instruments, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them, if any, to secure the indebtedness. If the lenders under our current or future indebtedness accelerate the payment of the indebtedness, we cannot be sure that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full our outstanding indebtedness.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Most Denny’s restaurants are free-standing facilities with property sizes averaging approximately one acre. The restaurant buildings average between 3,800 - ~~4,800~~5,000 square feet, allowing them to accommodate an average of ~~130-150~~110-170 guests. The number and location of our restaurants as of December ~~31, 2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 25, 2013~~30, 2015 are presented below:

1314


	2014			2013
State/Country	Company	Franchised / Licensed	Total	Company	Franchised / Licensed	Total
United States							Company	Franchised / Licensed	Total
Alabama	2	5	7	2	5	7	2	5	7
Alaska	—	3	3	—	3	3	—	3	3
Arizona	8	68	76	8	72	80	7	74	81
Arkansas	—	9	9	—	9	9	—	9	9
California	58	343	401	59	350	409	59	340	399
Colorado	—	29	29	—	30	30	—	29	29
Connecticut	—	11	11	—	10	10	—	11	11
Delaware	—	1	1	—	1	1	—	1	1
District of Columbia	—	2	2	—	2	2	—	2	2
Florida	18	125	143	18	130	148	18	120	138
Georgia	1	17	18	1	17	18	1	20	21
Hawaii	2	5	7	3	5	8	2	4	6
Idaho	—	11	11	—	10	10	—	11	11
Illinois	7	48	55	7	48	55	7	47	54
Indiana	—	37	37	—	37	37	—	37	37
Iowa	—	2	2	—	3	3	—	2	2
Kansas	—	8	8	—	9	9	—	8	8
Kentucky	2	15	17	2	15	17	2	14	16
Louisiana	1	3	4	1	3	4	1	3	4
Maine	—	7	7	—	7	7	—	7	7
Maryland	3	22	25	3	19	22	3	22	25
Massachusetts	—	6	6	—	6	6	—	7	7
Michigan	4	18	22	4	17	21	4	17	21
Minnesota	—	14	14	—	13	13	—	15	15
Mississippi	1	3	4	1	2	3	1	4	5
Missouri	4	36	40	4	35	39	4	37	41
Montana	—	4	4	—	4	4	—	4	4
Nebraska	—	5	5	—	5	5	—	5	5
Nevada	6	28	34	6	28	34	6	29	35
New Hampshire	—	3	3	—	3	3	—	3	3
New Jersey	—	9	9	—	9	9	—	9	9
New Mexico	—	28	28	—	27	27	—	27	27
New York	1	54	55	1	50	51	1	52	53
North Carolina	—	27	27	—	25	25	—	28	28
North Dakota	—	4	4	—	4	4	—	4	4
Ohio	4	38	42	4	37	41	4	38	42
Oklahoma	—	15	15	—	15	15	—	15	15
Oregon	—	25	25	—	24	24	—	24	24
Pennsylvania	11	29	40	11	28	39	11	28	39
Rhode Island	—	4	4	—	3	3	—	4	4
South Carolina	—	16	16	—	16	16	—	17	17
South Dakota	—	3	3	—	3	3	—	3	3
Tennessee	2	6	8	2	5	7	2	4	6
Texas	17	173	190	17	174	191	17	173	190
Utah	—	25	25	—	24	24	—	25	25
Vermont	—	2	2	—	2	2	—	2	2
Virginia	9	19	28	9	19	28	9	19	28
Washington	—	44	44	—	45	45	—	45	45
West Virginia	—	2	2	—	2	2	—	3	3
Wisconsin	—	21	21	—	23	23	3	21	24
Wyoming	—	3	3	—	3	3	—	4	4
Canada	—	68	68	—	64	64
Chile	—	1	1	—	1	1
Costa Rica	—	3	3	—	3	3
Curacao N.V.	—	1	1	—	1	1
Dominican Republic	—	2	2	—	1	1
El Salvador	—	1	1	—	1	1
Guam	—	2	2	—	2	2
Honduras	—	3	3	—	3	3
Mexico	—	6	6	—	6	6
New Zealand	—	7	7	—	7	7
Puerto Rico	—	12	12	—	12	12
Total	161	1,541	1,702	163	1,537	1,700
Total Domestic							164	1,435	1,599

1415



International	Company	Franchised / Licensed	Total
Canada	—	70	70
Chile	—	1	1
Costa Rica	—	3	3
Curacao N.V.	—	1	1
Dominican Republic	—	3	3
El Salvador	—	1	1
Guam	—	2	2
Honduras	—	3	3
Mexico	—	6	6
New Zealand	—	7	7
Puerto Rico	—	12	12
United Arab Emirates	—	2	2
Total International	—	111	111
Total Domestic	164	1,435	1,599
Total	164	1,546	1,710

Of the total ~~1,702~~1,710 restaurants in the Denny's brand, our interest in restaurant properties consists of the following:


	Company Restaurants	Franchised Restaurants	Total	Company Restaurants	Franchised Restaurants	Total
Owned properties	35	56	91	36	57	93
Leased properties	126	294	420	128	258	386
	161	350	511	164	315	479

We have generally been able to renew our restaurant leases as they expire at then-current market rates. The remaining terms of leases range from less than one to approximately 3847 years, including optional renewal periods. In addition to the restaurant properties, we own an 18-story, 187,000 square foot office building in Spartanburg, South Carolina, which serves as our corporate headquarters. Our corporate offices currently occupy 17 floors of the building, with a portion of the building leased to others.

See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning encumbrances on substantially all of our properties.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

There are various claims and pending legal actions against or indirectly involving us, incidental to and arising out of the ordinary course of the business. In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available, the ultimate liability with respect to these proceedings and claims will not materially affect the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position. We record legal settlement costs as other operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income as those costs are incurred.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our ~~Common Stock~~common stock is listed under the symbol “DENN” and trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market ("NASDAQ"). The following table lists the high and low sales prices of ~~the Common Stock~~our common stock for each quarter of fiscal years ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, according to NASDAQ.


	High		Low		High		Low
2015
First quarter					$	12.08	$	9.61
Second quarter					12.10		10.20
Third quarter					12.80		10.86
Fourth quarter					11.54		9.18
2014
First quarter	$	7.49	$	6.27	$	7.49	$	6.27
Second quarter	6.93		6.13		6.93		6.13
Third quarter	7.28		6.18		7.28		6.18
Fourth quarter	10.73		6.92		10.73		6.92
2013
First quarter	$	5.86	$	4.68
Second quarter	6.24		5.27
Third quarter	6.37		5.41
Fourth quarter	7.51		6.01

Stockholders

As of ~~March 11, 2015,~~February 24, 2016, there were ~~84,853,855~~77,008,685 shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock outstanding and approximately ~~13,300~~12,200 record and beneficial holders of ~~Common Stock.~~our common stock.

Dividends and Share Repurchases

Our credit facility allows for the payment of cash dividends and/or the repurchase of our ~~Common Stock,~~common stock, subject to certain limitations and continued maintenance of all relevant covenants before and after any such payment of any dividend or stock purchase. An aggregate amount ~~of $44.6 million~~ is available for such dividends or stock repurchases as follows:

not to exceed ~~$40.0~~$50.0 million if the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit ~~Agreement)~~Agreement, as amended) is ~~2.0x~~3.0x or greater and unlimited if the Consolidated Leverage Ratio is below ~~2.0x,~~3.0x, provided that, in each case, at least $20.0 million of availability is maintained under the revolving credit facility after such payment; and

an additional annual aggregate amount equal to $0.05 times the number of outstanding shares of ~~Common Stock,~~our common stock, as of ~~March 27, 2013,~~December 31, 2014, plus each additional share of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock that is issued after such date.

Though we have not historically paid cash dividends, we have in recent years undertaken share repurchases. The table below provides information concerning repurchases of shares of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock during the quarter ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015.

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid Per Share (1)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs (2) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (2)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
September 25, 2014 – October 22, 2014 113
$ 7.31
113
4,234
October 23, 2014 – November 19, 2014 175
8.76
175
4,059
November 20, 2014 – December 31, 2014 170
9.79
170
3,889
Total 458
$ 8.79
458



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share ⁽¹⁾			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Programs⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
October 1, 2015 - October 28, 2015	1,033		$	11.10		1,033		$	93,173
October 29, 2015 – November 25, 2015	3,899	⁽⁴⁾	10.47		⁽⁴⁾	3,899	⁽⁴⁾	$	39,251	⁽⁵⁾
November 26, 2015 – December 30, 2015	147		9.71			147		$	37,825
Total	5,079		$	10.57		5,079


(1)	Average price paid per share excludes commissions.

(2)

On April 25, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a new share repurchase program, authorizing us to repurchase up to an additional 10 million shares of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock (in addition to ~~a previous 6 million share authorization completed in the third quarter of 2013)~~prior authorizations). Such repurchases may take place from time to time on the open market (including in pre-arranged stock trading plans in accordance with the guidelines specified in Rule 10b5-1 under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange ~~Act of 1934)~~Act) or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to market and business conditions. During the quarter ended December ~~31, 2014~~,30, 2015, we purchased ~~457,600~~420,265 shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock for an aggregate consideration of approximately ~~$4.0~~$4.7 million, pursuant to ~~the~~this share repurchase program, thus completing this program.

(3)

On March 31, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program, authorizing us to repurchase up to an additional $100 million of our common stock. Such repurchases are to be made in a manner similar to, and in addition to, authorizations under the April 25, 2013 repurchase program. During the quarter ended December 30, 2015, we purchased 4,658,609 shares of our common stock for an aggregate consideration of approximately $49.1 million, pursuant to this share repurchase program.

(4)

Includes the initial delivery of 3.5 million shares of our common stock received under the variable term, capped accelerated share repurchase (the "ASR") agreement we entered into in November 2015 to repurchase an aggregate of $50 million of our common stock. These shares were recorded at the closing price on the day of repurchase and represent the minimum shares to be delivered based on the cap price. The total aggregate number of shares of our common stock repurchased pursuant to the ASR agreement will be based generally on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock, less a fixed discount, over the term of the ASR agreement, subject to a minimum number of shares.


(5)	Includes the full $50 million payment related to the ASR agreement, consisting of $36.9 million for the initial delivery of 3.5 million shares of our common stock and $13.1 million for the equity forward contract related to the settlement of the ASR agreement.

1618

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 with respect to our compensation plans under which equity securities of Denny’s Corporation are authorized for issuance.


Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (2)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	3,794,151	(1)	$	3.17	3,028,426	(3)	3,575,903	(1)	$	3.08	2,455,041	(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	200,000	(4)	3.89		827,589	(5)	200,000	(4)	3.89		827,589	(5)
Total	3,994,151		$	3.26	3,856,015		3,775,903		$	3.20	3,282,630


(1)	Includes shares issuable in connection with our outstanding stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock units awards.


(2)	Includes the weighted-average exercise price of stock options only.


(3)	Includes shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock available for issuance as awards of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units and performance awards under the 2012 Omnibus Plan.


(4)	Includes shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock issuable pursuant to the grant or exercise of employment inducement awards of stock options and restricted stock units granted outside of the Denny's Incentive Plans in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).


(5)	Includes shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock available for issuance as awards of stock options and restricted stock units outside of the Denny's Incentive Plans in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total ~~stockholders’~~shareholders’ return on our ~~Common Stock~~common stock for the five fiscal years ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 (December ~~30, 2009~~29, 2010 to December ~~31, 2014)~~30, 2015) against the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000® Index and a peer group. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested on December ~~30, 2009~~29, 2010 (the last day of fiscal year ~~2009)~~2010) in each of the Company’s ~~Common Stock,~~common stock, the Russell 2000® Index and the peer group and that all dividends were reinvested.

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DECEMBER ~~30, 2009~~29, 2010

ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015


	Russell 2000® Index (1)		Peer Group (2)		Denny's Corporation		Russell 2000® Index (1)		Peer Group (2)		Denny's Corporation
December 30, 2009	$	100.00	$	100.00	$	100.00
December 29, 2010	$	126.30	$	153.09	$	158.82	$	100.00	$	100.00	$	100.00
December 28, 2011	$	119.09	$	190.28	$	172.85	$	94.29	$	124.36	$	108.83
December 26, 2012	$	137.84	$	207.46	$	217.65	$	109.13	$	135.62	$	137.04
December 25, 2013	$	193.44	$	334.40	$	334.84	$	153.17	$	218.95	$	210.83
December 31, 2014	$	203.33	$	401.61	$	466.52	$	161.00	$	262.83	$	293.73
December 30, 2015							$	155.76	$	240.45	$	284.62


(1)	The Russell 2000 Index is a broad equity market index of 2,000 companies that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. As of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, the weighted average market capitalization of companies within the index was approximately $1.9 billion with the median market capitalization being approximately $0.7 billion.

(2)

The peer group consists of 2019 public companies that operate in the restaurant industry. The peer group includes the following companies: ~~Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (BAGL) (through its last public trading day of November 4, 2014),~~ BJ's Restaurants, Inc. (BJRI), Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (BOBE), Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. (BWLD), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE), Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL), Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG), DineEquity, Inc. (DIN), Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc. (DNKN), Domino’s Pizza, Inc. (DPZ), Brinker International, Inc. (EAT), Jack In The Box Inc. (JACK), Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (KKD), Panera Bread Company (PNRA), Papa John’s International, Inc. (PZZA), Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB), Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (RT), Sonic Corp. (SONC), Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and The Wendy’s Company (WEN).

1820

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table provides selected financial data that was extracted or derived from our audited financial statements. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.


	Fiscal Year Ended															Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014 (a)			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 28, 2011 (b)			December 29, 2010			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014 (a)			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 28, 2011 (b)
	(In millions, except ratios and per share amounts)															(In millions, except ratios and per share amounts)
Statement of Income Data:
Operating revenue	$	472.3		$	462.6		$	488.4		$	538.5		$	548.5		$	491.3		$	472.3		$	462.6		$	488.4		$	538.5
Operating income	$	57.3		$	47.5		$	56.4		$	51.0		$	55.2		$	63.2		$	57.3		$	47.5		$	56.4		$	51.0
Income from continuing operations	$	32.7		$	24.6		$	22.3		$	112.3		$	22.7		$	36.0		$	32.7		$	24.6		$	22.3		$	112.3
Basic net income per share:	$	0.38		$	0.27		$	0.23		$	1.15		$	0.23		$	0.44		$	0.38		$	0.27		$	0.23		$	1.15
Diluted net income per share:	$	0.37		$	0.26		$	0.23		$	1.13		$	0.22		$	0.42		$	0.37		$	0.26		$	0.23		$	1.13

Cash dividends per common share (c)	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Current assets(d)	$	56.1		$	53.8		$	64.6		$	61.3		$	62.5		$	36.4		$	56.1		$	53.8		$	64.6		$	61.3
Working capital deficit ~~(d)~~(e)	$	(24.3	)	$	(20.3	)	$	(27.2	)	$	(25.9	)	$	(27.8	)	$	(65.1	)	$	(24.3	)	$	(20.3	)	$	(27.2	)	$	(25.9	)
Net property and equipment	$	109.8		$	105.6		$	107.0		$	112.8		$	129.5		$	124.8		$	109.8		$	105.6		$	107.0		$	112.8
Total assets	$	289.9		$	295.8		$	324.9		$	350.5		$	311.2		$	297.0		$	289.9		$	295.8		$	324.9		$	350.5
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current portion	$	151.1		$	165.9		$	177.5		$	211.3		$	253.1		$	212.5		$	151.1		$	165.9		$	177.5		$	211.3


(a)	The fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 includes 53 weeks of operations as compared with 52 weeks for all other years presented. We estimate that the additional operating week added approximately $10.7 million of operating revenue in 2014.


(b)	During 2011, we concluded that it was more likely than not that certain of our deferred tax assets would be utilized. As a result, we released the majority of our valuation allowance, recognizing a tax benefit of $89.1 million.


(c)	Prior to the 2010 refinancing of our credit facility and repurchase and redemption of our public debt securities, distributions and dividends on Denny’s Corporation’s common equity securities were prohibited. Our ~~current~~ credit facility allows for the payment of cash dividends and/or the purchase of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock subject to certain limitations. See Part II Item 5.

(d)

During 2015, we early adopted ASU 2015-17, which simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. We chose to prospectively apply the guidance, therefore, as a result of our early adoption, all deferred taxes are reported as noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 30, 2015. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.


(e)	A negative working capital position is not unusual for a restaurant operating company.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data,” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

Overview

Nature of Our Business

Denny’s Corporation (Denny’s) is one of America’s largest franchised full-service restaurant chains. Denny’s, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Denny’s, Inc., owns and operates the Denny’s brand. At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, the Denny’s brand consisted of ~~1,702~~1,710 franchised, licensed and company operated restaurants. Of this amount, ~~1,541~~1,546 of our restaurants were franchised or licensed, representing ~~91%~~90% of the total restaurants, and ~~161~~164 were company operated.

Our revenues are derived primarily from two sources: the sale of food and beverages at our company restaurants and the collection of royalties and fees from restaurants operated by our franchisees under the Denny’s name. Sales and customer traffic at both company and franchised restaurants are affected by the success of our marketing campaigns, new product introductions, customer service and menu pricing, as well as external factors including competition, economic conditions affecting consumer spending and changes in guest tastes and preferences. Sales at company restaurants and royalty income from franchise restaurants are also impacted by the opening of new restaurants, the closing of existing restaurants and the sale of company restaurants to franchisees.

Our operating costs are exposed to volatility in two main areas: payroll and benefit costs and product costs. The volatility of payroll and benefit costs results primarily from changes in wage rates and increases in labor related expenses, such as medical benefit costs and workers' compensation costs. Additionally, changes in guest counts and investments in store-level labor impact payroll and benefit costs as a percentage of sales. Many of the products sold in our restaurants are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to price volatility. This volatility is caused by factors that are fundamentally outside of our control and are often unpredictable. In general, we purchase food products based on market prices or we set firm prices in purchase agreements with our vendors. Our ability to lock in prices on certain key commodities is imperative to control food costs in an environment in which many commodity prices are on the rise. In addition, our continued success with menu management helps us to offer menu items that provide a compelling value to our customers while maintaining consistent product costs and appropriate profitability.

~~2014~~2015 Summary of Operations

During ~~2014,~~2015, we achieved domestic system-wide same-stores sales growth of ~~2.8%~~5.8%, comprised of a ~~4.2%~~6.5% increase at company restaurants and a ~~2.5%~~5.7% increase at domestic franchised restaurants. ~~This growth represents the strongest annual~~In addition to growing system-wide same-store sales ~~since 2004 for company restaurants and since 2006 for franchised restaurants. We have had~~in 18 of the past 19 quarters, Denny’s has achieved its fifth consecutive year of positive system-wide same-store sales and highest annual system-wide same-store sales growth in ~~14 of the last 15 quarters.~~over a decade. The system-wide same-store sales increases during ~~2014~~2015 included benefits from both product mix and price increases ~~of around~~slightly above 2%. ~~Company restaurant same-store sales also benefited from traffic increases primarily resulting from remodels.~~

WeA total of 232 remodels were completed ~~171 remodels,~~during 2015, comprised of 4451 at company restaurants and ~~127~~181 at franchised ~~restaurants during 2014.~~restaurants. Most of these remodels were in our new Heritage image, which we launched late in 2013. This updated look reflects a more contemporary diner feel to further reinforce our America's Diner positioning. ~~During 2015, we~~We anticipate over 200 remodels will ~~continue to accelerate the timing of remodels at~~be completed system-wide in 2016, including approximately 25 company restaurants with a target of completing 45 to 50. Franchisees typically remodel their restaurants as required every seven years. We expect the number of remodels at franchised restaurants to be similar to the number remodeled in 2014.restaurant remodels.

~~We also~~During 2014, we implemented a new franchise agreement, ~~during 2014,~~ which ~~includes~~included an increased royalty rate of 4.5% and a reduced advertising contribution of 3%, excluding any incentives. There were approximately ~~230~~420 franchised restaurants operating under this agreement as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, and we expect there to be ~~360 to 390~~approximately 520 franchised restaurants operating under this agreement by the end of ~~2015.~~2016. We anticipate that existing franchisees will elect to migrate to the new fee structure over the next decade as incentives under the previous franchise agreements expire. Due to the long-term migration of existing franchisees, we ~~won’t~~will not see the full benefit ~~from~~of the higher royalty rate for some time. For ~~2014,~~2015, our average royalty rate was approximately ~~3.98%~~4.02%.

Operating income increased ~~$9.8~~$5.8 million to $63.2 million in 2015 from $57.3 million in ~~2014 from $47.5 million in 2013.~~2014. Net income increased ~~$8.2~~$3.3 million to $36.0 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, in 2015 compared to $32.7 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, in ~~2014 compared to $24.6 million, or $0.26 per diluted share in 2013.~~2014.

We had a 52 week year in 2015 and a 53 week year in 2014, which impacts the comparison of our financial ~~information to the prior year periods.~~information. We estimate that the additional 2014 operating week added approximately $8.3 million of company restaurant sales and $2.4 million of franchise and license revenue and resulted in approximately $0.6 million of additional general and administrative expenses, $3.6 million of additional operating income and $2.2 million of additional net income.

Growing the Brand

Over the last five years our growth initiatives have led to ~~321~~230 new restaurant openings. During ~~2014,~~2015, we had net restaurant growth of ~~two~~eight restaurants, with 3845 openings and 3637 closures. Our openings included ~~the reopening of our Las Vegas Casino Royale location, six~~three new company operated travel center restaurants in partnership with Kwik Trip^TM convenience stores and eight franchised international locations, including four in Canada, two in the United Arab Emirates and ~~three franchised nontraditional locations.~~

two in the Dominican Republic. Our goal is to increase net restaurant growth through all avenues: domestic, international and nontraditional. Domestic growth will focus on markets in ~~markets where~~which we have modest penetration. ~~During 2014, we saw traction in under-penetrated areas such as Charlotte, Atlanta and New York, including our first restaurant in Manhattan. We anticipate continued growth in these areas.~~

Internationally, we are the largest U.S. based, full-service brand operating in Canada and expect additional growth in this country. During 2015, we anticipate the opening of our first restaurant in the United Arab Emirates. The franchise partner opening this restaurant plans to develop 30 new Denny’s restaurants in nine countries in the Middle East over the next ten years.

We opened our first nontraditional location under the new The Den® format located adjacent to San Diego State University in early 2015. We expect that future non-traditional restaurants will be in this new format and our other existing non-traditional locations will be converted to this new format over time.

Balancing the Use of Cash

We are focused on balancing the use of cash between reinvesting in our base of company restaurants, growing and strengthening the brand and returning cash to shareholders. As noted above, we are accelerating the timing of remodels at our company restaurants under our new Heritage image. During ~~2014,~~2015, approximately ~~$12.2~~$12.7 million of our ~~$22.1~~$27.0 million of capital expenditures were from remodels.

In November 2015, as part of our previously authorized share repurchase programs, we entered into a variable term, capped accelerated share repurchase (the "ASR") agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), to repurchase an aggregate of $50 million of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the ASR agreement, we paid $50 million in cash and received approximately 3.5 million shares of our common stock, which represents the minimum shares to be delivered based on the cap price. We recorded $36.9 million of treasury stock related to these shares. The remaining balance of $13.1 million is included as additional paid-in capital in shareholders' equity as of December 30, 2015 as an equity forward contract and will be settled during 2016. The total aggregate number of shares of our common stock repurchased pursuant to the ASR agreement will be based generally on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock, less a fixed discount, over the term of the ASR agreement, subject to a minimum number of shares. The ASR agreement is expected to be completed no later than July 2016, although the completion date may be accelerated or, under certain circumstances, extended, at Wells Fargo's option.

During ~~2014,~~2015, we repurchased ~~5.3~~8.5 million shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock for ~~$36.0 million.~~$92.7 million, which includes the initial shares received under the ASR agreement. Taking into consideration the $13.1 million equity forward contract, we allocated $105.8 million to share repurchases during the year. Since initiating our share repurchase programs in November 2010, we have repurchased a total of ~~21.1~~29.7 million shares of ~~Common Stock~~our common stock for ~~$108.3~~$201.0 million. As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, there ~~are 3.9~~is $37.8 million ~~shares~~of our common stock remaining to be repurchased under the current repurchase program.

Factors impacting comparability

For 2015, 2014 ~~2013~~ and ~~2012,~~2013, the following items ~~impact~~impacted the comparability of our results:

Company restaurant sales have ~~decreased~~increased from ~~$353.7~~$328.3 million in ~~2012~~2013 to $~~334.7~~353.1 million in ~~2014,~~2015, primarily as a result of the ~~sale of restaurants to franchisees~~increase in ~~2012.~~same-store sales.

The decline in company restaurant revenues is partially offset by increased royalty income derived from the growth in the franchised restaurant base resulting from both traditional development and the sale of restaurants to franchisees. As a result, royaltyRoyalty income, which is included as a component of franchise and license revenue, has increased from ~~$83.8~~$85.5 million in ~~2012~~2013 to $~~90.8~~94.8 million in ~~2014.~~ 2015, primarily as a result of the increase in same-store sales.

~~The resulting net reduction in total revenue related to the sale of restaurants is generally recovered by the benefits of a lower cost structure related to franchise and license revenues.~~

Initial franchise fees, included as a component of franchise and license revenue, are generally recognized in the period in which a restaurant is sold to a franchisee or when a new restaurant is opened. These initial fees are completely dependent on the number of restaurants sold to or opened by franchisees during a particular period and, as a result, can cause fluctuations in our total franchise and license revenue from year to year.

Occupancy revenues, also included as a component of franchise and license revenue, result from leasing or subleasing restaurants to franchisees. When restaurants are sold and leased or subleased to franchisees, the occupancy costs related to these restaurants move from costs of company restaurant sales to costs of franchise and license revenue to match the related occupancy revenue. As leases or subleases with franchisees end over time, franchise occupancy revenue and costs could decrease if franchisees enter into direct leases with landlords. At the end of ~~2014,~~2015, we had ~~350~~315 franchise restaurants that are leased or subleased from Denny’s.

Our fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in December. As a result, a fifty-third week is added to a fiscal year every five or six years. As noted above, the year ended ~~December 31,~~fiscal 2014 ~~includes~~included 53 weeks of operations, whereas 2015 and 2013 each included 52 weeks of operations.

Statements of Income


	Fiscal Year Ended																Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014						December 25, 2013					December 26, 2012					December 30, 2015					December 31, 2014						December 25, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Company restaurant sales	$	334,684			70.9	%	$	328,334		71.0	%	$	353,710		72.4	%	$	353,073		71.9	%	$	334,684			70.9	%	$	328,334		71.0	%
Franchise and license revenue	137,611				29.1	%	134,259			29.0	%	134,653			27.6	%	138,220			28.1	%	137,611				29.1	%	134,259			29.0	%
Total operating revenue	472,295				100.0	%	462,593			100.0	%	488,363			100.0	%	491,293			100.0	%	472,295				100.0	%	462,593			100.0	%
Costs of company restaurant sales (a):
Product costs	86,825				25.9	%	85,540			26.1	%	88,473			25.0	%	89,660			25.4	%	86,825				25.9	%	85,540			26.1	%
Payroll and benefits	133,280				39.8	%	131,305			40.0	%	141,303			39.9	%	136,626			38.7	%	133,280				39.8	%	131,305			40.0	%
Occupancy	20,845				6.2	%	21,519			6.6	%	23,405			6.6	%	20,443			5.8	%	20,845				6.2	%	21,519			6.6	%
Other operating expenses	47,858				14.3	%	45,192			13.8	%	49,025			13.9	%	47,628			13.5	%	47,858				14.3	%	45,192			13.8	%
Total costs of company restaurant sales	288,808				86.3	%	283,556			86.4	%	302,206			85.4	%	294,357			83.4	%	288,808				86.3	%	283,556			86.4	%
Costs of franchise and license revenue (a)	44,761				32.5	%	46,109			34.3	%	46,675			34.7	%	43,345			31.4	%	44,761				32.5	%	46,109			34.3	%
General and administrative expenses	58,907				12.5	%	56,835			12.3	%	60,307			12.3	%	66,602			13.6	%	58,907				12.5	%	56,835			12.3	%
Depreciation and amortization	21,218				4.5	%	21,501			4.6	%	22,304			4.6	%	21,472			4.4	%	21,218				4.5	%	21,501			4.6	%
Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net	1,270				0.3	%	7,071			1.5	%	482			0.1	%	2,366			0.5	%	1,270				0.3	%	7,071			1.5	%
Total operating costs and expenses, net	414,964				87.9	%	415,072			89.7	%	431,974			88.5	%	428,142			87.1	%	414,964				87.9	%	415,072			89.7	%
Operating income	57,331				12.1	%	47,521			10.3	%	56,389			11.5	%	63,151			12.9	%	57,331				12.1	%	47,521			10.3	%
Interest expense, net	9,182				1.9	%	10,282			2.2	%	13,369			2.7	%	9,283			1.9	%	9,182				1.9	%	10,282			2.2	%
Other nonoperating (income) expense, net	(612		)		(0.1	)%	1,139			0.2	%	7,926			1.6	%
Other nonoperating expense (income), net																	139			0.0	%	(612		)		(0.1	)%	1,139			0.2	%
Net income before income taxes	48,761				10.3	%	36,100			7.8	%	35,094			7.2	%	53,729			10.9	%	48,761				10.3	%	36,100			7.8	%
Provision for income taxes	16,036				3.4	%	11,528			2.5	%	12,785			2.6	%	17,753			3.6	%	16,036				3.4	%	11,528			2.5	%
Net income	$	32,725			6.9	%	$	24,572		5.3	%	$	22,309		4.6	%	$	35,976		7.3	%	$	32,725			6.9	%	$	24,572		5.3	%

Other Data:
Company average unit sales	$	2,100					$	2,012				$	1,936				$	2,217				$	2,100					$	2,012
Franchise average unit sales	$	1,506					$	1,427				$	1,410				$	1,579				$	1,506					$	1,427
Company equivalent units (b)	159						163					183					159					159						163
Franchise equivalent units (b)	1,534						1,525					1,501					1,538					1,534						1,525
Company same-store sales increase (c)(d)	4.2			%			0.0		%			0.2		%			6.5		%			4.2			%			0.0		%
Domestic franchised same-store sales increase (c)	2.5			%			0.6		%			1.7		%			5.7		%			2.5			%			0.6		%


(a)	Costs of company restaurant sales percentages are as a percentage of company restaurant sales. Costs of franchise and license revenue percentages are as a percentage of franchise and license revenue. All other percentages are as a percentage of total operating revenue.


(b)	Equivalent units are calculated as the weighted average number of units outstanding during a defined time period.


(c)	Same-store sales include sales from restaurants that were open the same period in the prior year.


(d)	Prior year amounts have not been restated for ~~2014~~2015 comparable restaurants.

2224

Unit Activity


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
Company restaurants, beginning of period	163		164		206		161		163		164
Units opened	1		—		1		3		1		—
Units acquired from franchisees	—		2		1		3		—		2
Units sold to franchisees	—		(2	)	(36	)	(1	)	—		(2	)
Units closed	(3	)	(1	)	(8	)	(2	)	(3	)	(1	)
End of period	161		163		164		164		161		163

Franchised and licensed restaurants, beginning of period	1,537		1,524		1,479		1,541		1,537		1,524
Units opened	37		46		39		42		37		46
Units purchased from Company	—		2		36		1		—		2
Units acquired by Company	—		(2	)	(1	)	(3	)	—		(2	)
Units closed	(33	)	(33	)	(29	)	(35	)	(33	)	(33	)
End of period	1,541		1,537		1,524		1,546		1,541		1,537
Total restaurants, end of period	1,702		1,700		1,688		1,710		1,702		1,700

Company Restaurant Operations

Company same-store sales increased 6.5% in 2015 and 4.2% in ~~2014 and remained essentially flat in~~ ~~2013~~2014~~, as~~ compared with the respective prior year. Company restaurant sales for ~~2014~~2015 increased $~~6.4~~18.4 million, or ~~1.9%~~5.5%, primarily resulting from the increase in same-store sales and from the November 2014 reopening of our highest volume restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada. Company restaurant sales for 2014 increased $6.4 million, or 1.9%, primarily resulting from the additional operating week and the increase in same-store sales. ~~These increases were~~The 2014 increase was partially offset by a 4 equivalent unit decrease in company restaurants, ~~which includes~~including the temporary closure of ~~our highest volume restaurant in~~the Las Vegas, Nevada restaurant noted above and temporary closures for remodeling restaurants. ~~Company restaurant sales for~~ ~~2013~~ decreased $25.4 million, or 7.2%, primarily resulting from a 20 equivalent unit decrease in company restaurants. The decrease in equivalent units reflects the impact of our refranchising program that was completed at the end of 2012.

Total costs of company restaurant sales as a percentage of company restaurant sales were ~~86.3%~~83.4% in ~~2014,~~2015, ~~86.4%~~86.3% in ~~2013~~2014 and ~~85.4%~~86.4% in ~~2012.~~2013.

Product costs were ~~25.9%~~25.4% in ~~2014,~~2015, ~~26.1%~~25.9% in ~~2013~~2014 and ~~25.0%~~26.1% in ~~2012.~~2013. The decrease in 2015 was primarily due to the favorable impact of product mix and the leveraging effect of higher sales, partially offset by the increased cost of eggs. The decrease in 2014 was primarily due to the leveraging effect of higher sales.

Payroll and benefits were 38.7% in 2015, 39.8% in 2014 and 40.0% in 2013. The decrease in 2015 was primarily due to a 1.0 percentage point decrease in labor costs, a 0.7 percentage point decrease in workers' compensation costs and a 0.2 percentage point decrease in group insurance, partially offset by a 0.8 percentage point increase in incentive compensation costs. The decrease in labor costs as a percentage of company restaurant sales was primarily due to the leveraging effect of higher sales. The ~~increase in~~ ~~2013~~ ~~was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of product mix as well as increased commodity costs.~~

~~Payroll and benefits were~~ ~~39.8%~~ ~~in 2014,~~ ~~40.0%~~ in ~~2013~~ ~~and 39.9% in 2012. The~~ decrease in 2014 was primarily due to a 0.5 percentage point decrease in labor costs and a 0.3 percentage point decrease in workers' compensation costs, partially offset by a 0.3 percentage point increase in group insurance and a 0.3 percentage point increase in incentive compensation costs. The ~~current year~~2015 period included ~~$0.6~~$2.1 million in ~~unfavorable~~favorable workers' compensation claims development as compared to ~~$2.0~~$0.6 million in unfavorable claims development in the ~~prior year period. The increase in group insurance relates to the costs of implementing the Affordable Care Act during the current year~~2014 period. The incentive compensation ~~increase is~~increases in both years are primarily due to increased same-store sales performance. ~~The slight increase in~~ ~~2013~~ ~~was primarily due to increased workers' compensation costs that were partially offset by decreased labor costs.~~

Occupancy costs were ~~6.2%~~5.8% in ~~2014, 6.6%~~2015, 6.2% in ~~2013~~2014 and 6.6% in ~~2012.~~2013. The 2015 decrease is primarily related to a 0.4 percentage point decrease in general liability costs. The 2014 decrease is primarily related to an increase in the number of capital leases and a decrease in rent ~~caused by~~resulting from certain lease amendments.

2325

Other operating expenses were comprised of the following amounts and percentages of company restaurant sales:


	Fiscal Year Ended												Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013				December 26, 2012				December 30, 2015				December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Utilities	$	13,915	4.2	%	$	13,051	4.0	%	$	14,358	4.1	%	$	12,866	3.6	%	$	13,915	4.2	%	$	13,051	4.0	%
Repairs and maintenance	5,971		1.8	%	5,943		1.8	%	6,259		1.8	%	6,017		1.7	%	5,971		1.8	%	5,943		1.8	%
Marketing	12,329		3.7	%	11,696		3.6	%	13,397		3.8	%	12,527		3.5	%	12,329		3.7	%	11,696		3.6	%
Legal	830		0.2	%	773		0.2	%	682		0.2	%
Other direct costs	14,813		4.4	%	13,729		4.2	%	14,329		4.1	%	16,218		4.6	%	15,643		4.7	%	14,502		4.4	%
Other operating expenses	$	47,858	14.3	%	$	45,192	13.8	%	$	49,025	13.9	%	$	47,628	13.5	%	$	47,858	14.3	%	$	45,192	13.8	%

Franchise Operations

Franchise and license revenue and costs of franchise and license revenue were comprised of the following amounts and percentages of franchise and license revenue for the periods indicated:


	Fiscal Year Ended												Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013				December 26, 2012				December 30, 2015				December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Royalties	$	90,835	66.0	%	$	85,508	63.7	%	$	83,774	62.2	%	$	94,755	68.6	%	$	90,835	66.0	%	$	85,508	63.7	%
Initial fees	1,893		1.4	%	1,666		1.2	%	3,092		2.3	%	2,478		1.8	%	1,893		1.4	%	1,666		1.2	%
Occupancy revenue	44,883		32.6	%	47,085		35.1	%	47,787		35.5	%	40,987		29.6	%	44,883		32.6	%	47,085		35.1	%
Franchise and license revenue	$	137,611	100.0	%	$	134,259	100.0	%	$	134,653	100.0	%	$	138,220	100.0	%	$	137,611	100.0	%	$	134,259	100.0	%

Occupancy costs	33,134		24.1	%	34,631		25.8	%	35,401		26.3	%	$	30,416	22.0	%	$	33,134	24.1	%	$	34,631	25.8	%
Other direct costs	11,627		8.4	%	11,478		8.5	%	11,274		8.4	%	12,929		9.4	%	11,627		8.4	%	11,478		8.5	%
Costs of franchise and license revenue	$	44,761	32.5	%	$	46,109	34.3	%	$	46,675	34.7	%	$	43,345	31.4	%	$	44,761	32.5	%	$	46,109	34.3	%

Royalties increased by $~~5.3~~3.9 million, or ~~6.2%~~4.3%, in 2015 primarily resulting from a 5.7%increase in domestic same-store sales compared to 2014. In addition, certain franchised restaurants moved to a higher rate structure. Royalties increased by $5.3 million, or 6.2%, in 2014 primarily resulting from the additional operating week and a 2.5%increase in domestic same-store sales as compared to ~~2013~~.2013. In addition, there was a 9 ~~equivalent unit~~ ~~increase~~ ~~in franchised and licensed restaurants, as compared to~~ ~~2013, and an increase in royalties as certain restaurants moved to our new rate structure. Royalties increased by $1.7 million, or 2.1%, in~~ ~~2013~~ ~~primarily resulting from a 24~~nine equivalent unit increase in franchised and licensed restaurants ~~and a 0.6% increase in domestic same-store sales, as~~ compared to ~~2012. The increase in equivalent units reflects the impact of our refranchising program that was completed at the end of 2012.~~2013 and certain franchised restaurants moved to a higher rate structure.

Initial fees increased by $~~0.2~~0.6 million, or ~~13.6%~~30.9%, in 2015 primarily resulting from an increase in the number of restaurants being opened by franchisees and a higher number of successor franchise agreements signed during the current year. Initial fees increased by $0.2 million, or 13.6%, in 2014 primarily resulting from an increase in the number of assignments between ~~franchisees. Initial fees decreased by $1.4 million, or 46.1%, in~~ ~~2013~~ ~~primarily resulting from fewer restaurants being opened by or sold to~~ franchisees compared to the ~~respective~~ prior year period. Occupancy revenue decreased by $~~2.2~~3.9 million, or ~~4.7%~~8.7%, in ~~2014~~2015 and by ~~$0.7~~$2.2 million, or ~~1.5%~~4.7%, in ~~2013~~2014 primarily resulting from lease expirations.

Occupancy costs decreased by $~~1.5~~2.7 million, or ~~4.3%~~8.2%, in ~~2014~~2015 and by ~~$0.8~~$1.5 million, or ~~2.2%~~4.3%, in ~~2013~~2014 primarily resulting from lease expirations. Other direct costs increased by $~~0.1~~1.3 million, or ~~1.3%~~11.2%, in ~~2014~~2015 due to increased franchise administrative costs and by ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million, or ~~1.8%~~1.3%, in ~~2013~~2014. As a result, costs of franchise and license revenue decreased by $~~1.3~~1.4 million, or ~~2.9%~~3.2%, in ~~2014~~2015 and by ~~$0.6~~$1.3 million, or ~~1.2%~~2.9%, in ~~2013~~2014.

Other Operating Costs and Expenses

Other operating costs and expenses such as general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense relate to both company and franchise operations.

2426

General and administrative expenses are comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Share-based compensation	$	5,846	$	4,852	$	3,496	$	6,635	$	5,846	$	4,852
Other general and administrative expenses	53,061		51,983		56,811		59,967		53,061		51,983
Total general and administrative expenses	$	58,907	$	56,835	$	60,307	$	66,602	$	58,907	$	56,835

General and administrative expenses increased by $~~2.1~~7.7 million in 2015 primarily resulting from increases of $3.2 million in incentive compensation, $1.9 million in payroll and benefits and $0.8 million in share-based compensation. General and administrative expenses increased by $2.1 million in 2014 primarily resulting from increases of $1.6 million in incentive compensation, $1.0 million in share-based compensation and the impact of an additional operating week, partially offset by a reduction in deferred compensation of $0.6 ~~million. General and administrative expenses decreased by $3.5 million in~~ ~~2013~~ primarily resulting from reductions in incentive compensation of $2.2 million, professional fees of $1.2 million and other general and administrative expense of $1.8 million, partially offset by an increase in share-based compensation of $1.4 million. The increases in share-based compensation over the past two years are primarily due to the total shareholder return performance of our stock as compared to that of our competitor peer group within our share-based award plans.

Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Depreciation of property and equipment	$	15,627	$	15,062	$	15,819	$	16,548	$	15,627	$	15,062
Amortization of capital lease assets	3,536		3,527		3,282		3,449		3,536		3,527
Amortization of intangible and other assets	2,055		2,912		3,203		1,475		2,055		2,912
Total depreciation and amortization expense	$	21,218	$	21,501	$	22,304	$	21,472	$	21,218	$	21,501

~~The~~ ~~2013~~ ~~decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is due primarily to the sale of company restaurants to franchisees during fiscal 2012.~~

Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net are comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Gains on sales of assets and other, net	$	(112	)	$	(66	)	$	(7,090	)	$	(93	)	$	(112	)	$	(66	)
Restructuring charges and exit costs	981			1,389			3,912			1,524			981			1,389
Impairment charges	401			5,748			3,660			935			401			5,748
Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net	$	1,270		$	7,071		$	482		$	2,366		$	1,270		$	7,071

~~The gains recognized during 2012 primarily resulting from the sale of restaurant operations to franchisees and the sale of real estate.~~

Restructuring charges and exit costs were comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Exit costs	$	335	$	630	$	1,926	$	697	$	335	$	630
Severance and other restructuring charges	646		759		1,986		827		646		759
Total restructuring and exit costs	$	981	$	1,389	$	3,912	$	1,524	$	981	$	1,389

~~Severance and other restructuring~~Impairment charges for ~~2012 include charges related to~~2015 resulted primarily from the ~~departure~~impairment of ~~the company's former Chief Operating Officer.~~

restaurants identified as assets held for sale. Impairment charges for 2014 resulted primarily from the impairment of an underperforming restaurant. Impairment charges for 2013 resulted primarily from the $4.8 million impairment of an underperforming restaurant and the impairment of two restaurants and real estate identified as assets held for sale. ~~Impairment charges for 2012 resulted primarily from the impairment of seven restaurants identified as held for sale and the impairment of an underperforming restaurant.~~

Operating income was ~~$57.3~~$63.2 million in 2015, $57.3 million in 2014 ~~$47.5 million~~ in ~~2013~~and ~~$56.4~~$47.5 million in ~~2012.~~2013.

Interest expense, net is comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Interest on credit facilities	$	3,519		$	4,067		$	7,074		$	2,789		$	3,519		$	4,067
Interest on interest rate swaps										859			—			—
Interest on capital lease liabilities	3,319			3,708			3,580			3,537			3,319			3,708
Letters of credit and other fees	1,381			1,391			1,539			1,180			1,381			1,391
Interest income	(80		)	(82		)	(640		)	(66		)	(80		)	(82		)
Total cash interest	8,139			9,084			11,553			8,299			8,139			9,084
Amortization of deferred financing costs	483			497			775			507			483			497
Amortization of debt discount	—			—			137
Interest accretion on other liabilities	560			701			904			477			560			701
Total interest expense, net	$	9,182		$	10,282		$	13,369		$	9,283		$	9,182		$	10,282

~~The decrease in interest expense resulted from a decrease in interest rates related to the 2013 refinancing of our credit facility, as well as debt reductions made during the years presented.~~

Other nonoperating (income) expense, net was expense of $0.1 million for 2015, income of $0.6 million for ~~2014, expense of~~ ~~$1.1 million~~ ~~for~~ ~~2013~~2014 and expense of ~~$7.9~~$1.1 million for ~~2012.~~2013. The expense for the 2015 period consisted primarily of $0.3 million of write-offs of deferred financing costs related to the New Credit Facility (as defined below), partially offset by gains on lease terminations and deferred compensation plan investments. The income for the 2014 period consisted primarily of $0.5 million of gains on deferred compensation plan investments. The expense for the 2013 period consisted primarily of $1.2 million in expenses and write-offs of deferred financing costs incurred related to our 2013 debt refinancing and $1.0 million of write-offs related to lease terminations and amendments, partially offset by $1.1 million of gains on deferred compensation plan investments. ~~The expense for the 2012 period consisted primarily of expenses and write-offs of deferred financing costs and original issue discount incurred related to our 2012 debt refinancing.~~

The provision for income taxes was $17.8 million for 2015, $16.0 million for 2014 and $11.5 million for ~~2013~~2013. The effective tax rate was 33.0% for 2015, 32.9% for 2014 and ~~$12.8 million~~31.9% for ~~2012.~~ 2013. For the 2015 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was primarily related to state taxes and the generation of employment and foreign tax credits.

For the 2014 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was primarily due to state and foreign taxes, the generation of employment tax credits and two discrete tax items. State job tax credits of ~~$0.7 million~~1.3% were claimed during 2014 for current year’s hiring activity. State job tax credits of ~~$0.5 million~~1.1% were also claimed during the 2014 period resulting from the prior year's hiring activity. In addition, share-based compensation adjustments resulted in an out-of-period tax benefit of ~~$0.5 million.~~1.0%. We do not believe the out-of-period adjustment was material to any prior or current year financial statements or on earnings trends.

For the 2013 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was due to state and foreign taxes, employment tax credits and discrete tax items. The passage of the American Tax Payer Relief Act of 2012 resulted in deferred tax benefits of ~~$0.3 million~~1.0% related to work opportunity credits generated in 2012, which were allowed retroactively. In addition, state job tax credits of ~~$0.8 million~~2.2% were claimed during the 2013 period resulting from the prior year's hiring activity. ~~A valuation allowance of $0.2 million was recorded against certain state jobs tax credits during the 2013 period related to changes in California law enacted during the period.~~

For the 2012 period, the difference in the overall effective tax rate from the U.S. statutory rate was due to state and foreign taxes and discrete tax items, including a $1.7 million out-of-period adjustment related to the reversal of a portion of the income tax benefit recorded in fourth quarter of 2011. We do not believe the out-of-period adjustment was material to any prior or current year financial statements or on earnings trends. In addition, a $1.6 million tax benefit was recorded in 2012 relating to additional state credits generated during 2012 from prior years' activity.

Net income was $36.0 million for 2015, $32.7 million for ~~2014,~~ ~~$24.6 million~~ ~~for~~ ~~2013~~2014 and ~~$22.3~~$24.6 million for ~~2012.~~2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary of Cash Flows

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash generated from operations and borrowings under our credit facility (as described below). Principal uses of cash are operating expenses, capital expenditures ~~debt repayments~~ and the repurchase of shares of our common stock.

The following table presents a summary of our sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents for the periods indicated:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	74,911		$	57,042		$	80,637		$	74,911		$	57,042
Net cash used in investing activities	(21,289		)	(16,470		)	(32,735		)	(21,289		)	(16,470		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(53,491		)	(51,194		)	(49,305		)	(53,491		)	(51,194		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	131		$	(10,622	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents							$	(1,403	)	$	131		$	(10,622	)

We believe that our estimated cash flows from operations for ~~2015,~~2016, combined with our capacity for additional borrowings under our credit facility, will enable us to meet our anticipated cash requirements and fund capital expenditures over the next twelve months.

Net cash flows used in investing activities were $~~21.3~~32.7 million for the year ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015. These cash flows ~~include~~are primarily comprised of capital expenditures of $~~22.1~~27.0 million and ~~issuances~~acquisitions of ~~notes receivable~~restaurants and real estate of ~~$1.6 million, partially offset by collections of notes receivable of~~ ~~$2.3 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$0.1 million~~ ~~in proceeds from asset sales.~~$5.8 million. Our principal capital requirements have been largely associated with the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended				Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Facilities	$	6,154	$	4,961	$	9,743	$	6,154
New construction	187		505		2,262		187
Remodeling	12,184		8,671		12,688		12,184
Information technology	787		584		1,002		787
Other	2,764		2,097		1,282		2,764
Capital expenditures	$	22,076	$	16,818	$	26,977	$	22,076

Capital expenditures for fiscal ~~2015~~2016 are expected to be ~~approximately $23-25~~between $18-$20 million, including ~~45-50~~approximately 25 remodels anticipated to be completed at company restaurants.

Cash flows used in financing activities were $~~53.5~~49.3 million for the year ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, which included stock repurchases of $~~36.1~~92.6 million and the purchase of a $13.1 million equity forward contract related to the ASR agreement, partially offset by a net ~~decrease~~increase in long-term debt of ~~$17.2~~$51.4 million.

Our working capital deficit was $65.1 million at December 30, 2015 compared with $24.3 million at December 31, 2014 ~~compared with~~ ~~$20.3 million~~ at ~~December 25, 2013~~. The increase in working capital deficit is primarily related to the ~~increase~~reclassification of deferred tax assets from current to noncurrent in ~~incentive~~accordance with the adoption of ASU 2015-17, the reclassification of our pension liability from noncurrent to current resulting from the liquidation of the Advantica Pension Plan, which is to take place during 2016, and ~~share-based compensation accruals during~~ the ~~current year period.~~timing of payments impacting payable balances. We are able to operate with a substantial working capital deficit because (1) restaurant operations and most food service operations are conducted primarily on a cash (and cash equivalent) basis with a low level of accounts receivable, (2) rapid turnover allows a limited investment in inventories and (3) accounts payable for food, beverages and supplies usually become due after the receipt of cash from the related sales.

Refinancing and Amending of Credit Facility

On March 30, 2015, Denny's Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries ~~have~~refinanced our credit facility (the "Old Credit Facility") and entered into a ~~credit facility~~new five-year senior secured revolver (the “New Credit Facility”). On October 30, 2015, we amended the New Credit Facility (the "Amended New Credit Facility" or the "credit facility") to exercise the accordion feature that allowed us to increase the size of the revolver and to effect certain other changes. The Amended New Credit Facility is comprised of a ~~senior secured term loan in an original principal amount of $60 million and a $190~~$325 million senior secured revolver (with a $30 million letter of credit sublimit)~~. As of~~ ~~December 31, 2014, we had outstanding term loan borrowings~~ and is available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the credit facility bear a tiered interest rate. A tiered commitment fee is paid on the unused portion of ~~$54.8~~the credit facility. Both tiered rates are based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio and were initially set at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points and a commitment fee of 0.20%. The maturity date for the credit facility is March 30, 2020.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Amended New Credit Facility was used to fund the $50 million ASR agreement. As of December 30, 2015, we had outstanding revolver loans of $195.0 million and outstanding letters of credit under the senior secured revolver of ~~$25.7 million. There were~~ ~~$85.3 million~~ ~~in revolving loans outstanding at~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~.$22.9 million. These balances resulted in availability of ~~$79.0~~$107.1 million under the ~~revolving~~credit facility. ~~The weighted average~~Prior to considering the impact of our interest rate ~~under~~swap, described below, the ~~term loan and~~weighted-average interest rate on outstanding revolver loans was 1.76% and 2.17% as of December 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014,.

~~The revolving credit facility includes an accordion feature that would allow us to increase~~ respectively. Taking into consideration the ~~size of the facility to $240 million. A commitment fee of 0.35% is paid on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility bear a tiered~~ interest rate ~~based~~swap that became effective on March 31, 2015, the ~~Company's consolidated leverage ratio and~~weighted-average interest rate of outstanding revolver loans was ~~initially set at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The maturity date for the credit facility is April 24, 2018.~~

~~The credit facility is guaranteed by the Company and its material subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all~~2.31% as of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the stock of the Company's subsidiaries. It includes negative covenants and restrictions (including limitation on additional borrowings, acquisitions, loans to franchisees, capital expenditures, lease commitments, stock repurchases and dividend payments) that are usual for facilities of this type. The credit facility also includes certain financial covenants with respect to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and maximum capital expenditures.

The term loan under the credit facility requires amortization of the original term loan balance of 5% per year in the first two years (April 2013 through April 2015), 7.5% in the subsequent two years (April 2015 through April 2017) and 10% in the fifth year (April 2017 through April 2018) with the balance due at maturity. We are required to make certain mandatory prepayments under certain circumstances and have the option to make certain prepayments under the credit facility. The credit facility includes events of default (and related remedies, including acceleration and increased interest rates following an event of default) that are usual for facilities and transactions of this type.December 30, 2015.

Interest Rate Hedges

We ~~have~~previously entered into an interest rate hedges that cap the LIBOR rate on borrowings under our credit facility. The 200 basis point LIBOR cap applied to $125 million of borrowings from April 14, 2013 through April 13, 2014 and applies to $150 million of borrowings from April 14, 2014 through March 31, 2015.

~~We also have entered into interest rate swaps~~swap to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our floating rate debt from March 31, 2015 ~~through~~to March 29, 2018. During the first quarter ~~ended December 31, 2014,~~of 2015, we ~~determined that~~entered into an additional interest rate swap to hedge a portion of the ~~underlying~~ cash flows ~~related to the swap were no longer probable~~ of ~~occurring over the term of~~our floating rate debt from March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2025. We designated the interest rate ~~swap~~swaps as cash flow hedges of our exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to payments of LIBOR due toon a related $120 million notional debt obligation. In addition, during the ~~probability~~fourth quarter of ~~paying the debt down below the notional amount. As a result,~~2015, we ~~terminated~~entered into an additional interest rate swap ~~with~~to hedge a ~~notional amount~~portion of ~~$30 million.~~

the cash flows of our floating rate debt from March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2026. We ~~continue to designate the remaining~~designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to payments of LIBOR due on a related ~~$120~~$50 million notional debt ~~obligation from March 31, 2015 through March 29, 2018.~~ obligation.

Based on the interest rate as determined by our consolidated leverage ratio in effect as of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, under the terms of the ~~swap,~~swaps, we will pay an average fixed rate of ~~3.13%~~2.63% on the $120 million notional amount from March 31, 2015 to March 29, 2018, pay an average fixed rate of 3.94% on both the $120 million and ~~receive payments~~$50 million notional amounts from ~~a counterparty based~~March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2025, pay an average fixed rate of 3.96% on the ~~30-day LIBOR rate.~~$50 million notional amount from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026. As of December 30, 2015, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a liability of $1.7 million, which is recorded as a component of other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contractual Obligations

Our future contractual obligations and commitments at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 consisted of the following:


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-2 Years		3-4 Years		5 Years and Thereafter		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-2 Years		3-4 Years		5 Years and Thereafter
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Long-term debt	$	140,000	$	4,125	$	10,125	$	125,750	$	—	$	195,000	$	—	$	—	$	195,000	$	—
Capital lease obligations (a)	32,993		6,451		10,528		6,708		9,306		44,246		6,973		11,945		8,670		16,658
Operating lease obligations	194,167		31,904		56,131		40,521		65,611		170,780		30,157		51,245		34,864		54,514
Interest obligations (a)	9,634		3,007		5,720		907		—		24,451		4,508		11,001		8,942		—
Pension and other defined contribution plan obligations (b)	224		224		—		—		—		9,648		9,648		—		—		—
Purchase obligations (c)	205,622		185,045		20,577		—		—		223,440		185,185		38,255		—		—
Total	$	582,640	$	230,756	$	103,081	$	173,886	$	74,917	$	667,565	$	236,471	$	112,446	$	247,476	$	71,172

(a)

Interest obligations represent payments related to our long-term debt outstanding at December ~~31, 2014~~.30, 2015. For long-term debt with variable rates, we have used the rate applicable at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 to project interest over the periods presented in the table ~~above.~~above, taking into consideration the impact of the interest rate swaps for the applicable periods. The capital lease obligation amounts above are inclusive of interest.

(b)

Pension and other defined contribution plan obligations are estimates based on facts and circumstances at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015. Amounts cannot currently be estimated for more than one year. ~~This amount does not consider the planned termination of the Advantica Pension Plan.~~ During fiscal ~~2015 or early~~ 2016, we will be required to make contributions to our qualified pension plan as a result of the termination and planned ~~termination.~~liquidation. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the termination of our pension plan. We currently estimate that these contributions will be ~~between $6 million to $8~~approximately $9.4 million. This estimate is based on expected interest rates, returns on plan assets and participant elections.

(c)

Purchase obligations include amounts payable under purchase contracts for food and non-food products. Many of these agreements do not obligate us to purchase any specific volumes and include provisions that would allow us to cancel such agreements with appropriate notice. For agreements with cancellation provisions, amounts included in the table above represent our estimate of purchase obligations during the periods presented if we were to cancel these contracts with appropriate notice.

Unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain income tax positions are not included in the contractual obligations table as these liabilities may increase or decrease over time as a result of tax examinations, and given the status of the examinations, we cannot reliably estimate the period of any cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities. At December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, there were no unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain income tax positions, including potential interest and penalties.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Except for operating leases entered into during the normal course of business, we do not have any ~~off balance~~off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to self-insurance liabilities, impairment of long-lived assets, restructuring and exit costs, income taxes and share-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions; however, we believe that our estimates, including those for the above-described items, are reasonable.

Our significant accounting policies (including the critical accounting policies listed below) are fully described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements:

Self-insurance liabilities. We are self-insured for a portion of our losses related to certain medical plans, workers’ compensation, general/product liability and automobile insurance liability. In estimating these liabilities, we utilize independent actuarial estimates of expected losses, which are based on statistical analysis of historical data. Our estimates of expected losses are adjusted over time based on changes to the actual costs of the underlying claims, which could result in additional expense or reversal of expense previously recorded.

Impairment of long-lived assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment at the restaurant level on a quarterly basis, when assets are identified as held for sale or whenever changes or events indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. For assets identified as held for sale, we use the market approach and consider proceeds from similar asset sales. We assess impairment of restaurant-level assets based on the operating cash flows of the restaurant, expected proceeds from the sale of assets and our plans for restaurant closings. Generally, all restaurants with negative cash flows from operations for the most recent twelve months at each quarter end are included in our assessment. For underperforming assets, we use the income approach to determine both the recoverability and estimated fair value of the assets. To estimate future cash flows we make certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, such as revenue growth, operating margins, risk-adjusted discount rates, and future economic and market conditions. If the long-lived assets of a restaurant are not recoverable based

upon estimated future, undiscounted cash flows, we write the assets down to their fair value. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges.

Restructuring and exit costs. Discounted liabilities for future lease costs of closed restaurants, net of the fair value of related subleases, are recorded when the restaurants are closed. All other costs related to closed restaurants are expensed as incurred. In assessing the discounted liabilities for future costs of obligations related to closed restaurants, we make assumptions regarding amounts of future subleases.

The most significant estimates included in our accrued exit costs liabilities ~~relates~~relate to the timing and amount of estimated subleases. If any of the estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional exit costs or reduce exit costs previously recorded.

Income taxes. We make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of our provision for income taxes, in the resulting tax liabilities, and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets. We record valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets, when necessary. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable earnings and is therefore uncertain. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate will be recovered from future taxable income. Deferred tax assets do not include future tax benefits that we deem likely not to be realized.

Share-based compensation. Share-based compensation is estimated for equity awards at fair value at the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock units containing a market condition is determined using the Monte Carlo valuation method, which utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the Company achieving the market condition. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of the fair value of share-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in ~~the~~our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See the Accounting Standards to be Adopted section of Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further details of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

We have exposure to interest rate risk related to certain instruments entered into for other than trading purposes. Specifically, as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, borrowings under our credit facility bore interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a spread of ~~200~~150 basis points per annum. ~~Through~~Prior to refinancing the Old Credit Facility on March ~~31,~~30, 2015, up to $150 million of the borrowings under our credit facility has a 200 basis point LIBOR point cap.

OnOne interest rate swap became effective on March 31, 2015, which hedges our ~~interest rate swap with~~exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to payments of LIBOR due on a ~~notional amount of~~related $120 million ~~goes into effect.~~notional debt obligation. Based on our consolidated leverage ratio in effect as of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, under the terms of the swap, we will pay an average fixed rate of ~~3.13%~~2.63% on the $120 million notional amount from March 31, 2015 to March 29, 2018, pay an average fixed rate of 3.94% on both the $120 million and ~~receive payments~~$50 million notional amounts from ~~a counterparty based~~March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2025, pay an average fixed rate of 3.96% on the ~~30-day LIBOR~~$50 million notional amount from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026. As of December 30, 2015, the swap effectively increased our ratio of fixed rate ~~which~~debt from approximately 10% of total debt to approximately 65% of total debt. We expect to reclassify approximately $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our interest rate swaps during the next twelve months. This amount will ~~mitigate~~be included as a ~~portion~~component of interest expense in our ~~exposure~~Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 10 to ~~variability in future cash flows attributes to payments of LIBOR.~~our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

Based on the levels of borrowings under the credit facility at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, if interest rates changed by 100 basis points, our annual cash flow and income before taxes would change by approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.8 million. This computation is determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the credit facility at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, taking into consideration the ~~interest rate cap and~~ interest rate swap. However, the nature and amount of our borrowings may vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors.

We also have exposure to interest rate risk related to our pension plan, other defined benefit plans and self-insurance liabilities. A 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate ~~would increase or decrease our projected benefit obligation related to our pension plan by approximately $2.5 million and~~ would impact the pension plan's net periodic benefit cost by approximately $0.1 million. The impact of a 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate would decrease or increase, respectively, our projected benefit obligation related to our other defined benefit plans by less than $0.1 million while the plans' net periodic benefit cost would remain flat. A 25 basis point increase or decrease in discount rate related to our self-insurance liabilities would result in a decrease or increase of ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million, respectively.

Commodity Price Risk

We purchase certain food products, such as beef, poultry, pork, eggs and coffee, and utilities such as gas and electricity, ~~which~~that are affected by commodity pricing and are, therefore, subject to price volatility caused by weather, production problems, delivery difficulties and other factors that are outside our control and which are generally unpredictable. Changes in commodity prices affect us and our competitors generally and often simultaneously. In general, we purchase food products and utilities based upon market prices established with vendors. Although many of the items purchased are subject to changes in commodity prices, the majority of our purchasing arrangements are structured to contain features that minimize price volatility by establishing fixed pricing and/or price ceilings and floors. We use these types of purchase arrangements to control costs as an alternative to using financial instruments to hedge commodity prices. In many cases, we believe we will be able to address commodity cost increases which are significant and appear to be long-term in nature by adjusting our menu pricing or changing our product delivery strategy. However, competitive circumstances could limit such actions and, in those circumstances, increases in commodity prices could lower our margins. Because of the often short-term nature of commodity pricing aberrations and our ability to change menu pricing or product delivery strategies in response to commodity price increases, we believe that the impact of commodity price risk is not significant.

We have established a process to identify, control and manage market risks which may arise from changes in interest rates, commodity prices and other relevant rates and prices. We do not use derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See Index to Financial Statements which appears on page F-1 herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

A.Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) our management conducted an evaluation (under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, John C. Miller, and our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer, F. Mark Wolfinger) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the effectiveness of our disclosure

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange ~~Act. Based on~~Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) that ~~evaluation, Messrs. Miller and Wolfinger each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures~~ are ~~effective~~designed to ~~provide reasonable assurance~~ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act ~~(i)~~ is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and ~~(ii)~~that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including ~~Messrs. Miller~~our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Wolfinger,~~Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on their assessment as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

~~B. Management’s~~Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as ~~such term is~~ defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

~~Management has assessed~~Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December ~~31, 2014. Management’s assessment was~~30, 2015 based on ~~criteria set forth~~the framework in Internal ~~Control - Integrated~~Control-Integrated Framework ~~(1992)~~(2013) , issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway ~~Commission (COSO).~~Commission. Based ~~upon this assessment,~~on that evaluation, our management concluded that ~~as of~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~, our internal control over financial reporting was effective ~~based upon those criteria.~~as of December 30, 2015.

The ~~Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an attestation report on~~effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting ~~which follows this report.~~as of December 30, 2015 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that appears herein.

~~C. Changes in~~ Internal Control ~~Over~~over Financial Reporting.

There ~~have been~~were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting ~~identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred~~ during our ~~last fiscal~~fourth quarter ~~(our fourth fiscal quarter)~~ended December 30, 2015, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3234

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Denny's Corporation

We have audited Denny’s Corporation’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework ~~(1992)~~(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A.). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Denny’s Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework ~~(1992)~~(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Denny’s Corporation and subsidiaries as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, and our report dated ~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016

3335

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information required by this item with respect to our executive officers and directors; compliance by our directors, executive officers and certain beneficial owners of our ~~Common Stock~~common stock with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act; the committees of our Board of Directors; our Audit Committee Financial Expert; and our Code of Ethics is furnished by incorporation by reference to information under the captions entitled "General-Equity Security Ownership", “Election of Directors”, "Executive Compensation", “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, "Related Party Transactions" and "Code of Ethics" in the proxy statement (to be filed hereafter) in connection with Denny’s Corporation's ~~2015~~2016 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders (the "proxy statement") and possibly elsewhere in the proxy statement (or will be filed by amendment to this report). Additional information required by this item related to our executive officers appears in Item 1 of Part I of this report under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is furnished by incorporation by reference to information under the captions entitled “Executive Compensation” and "Election of Directors" in the proxy statement and possibly elsewhere in the proxy statement (or will be filed by amendment to this report).

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is furnished by incorporation by reference to information under the caption “General—Equity Security Ownership” in the proxy statement and possibly elsewhere in the proxy statement (or will be filed by amendment to this report).

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is furnished by incorporation by reference to information under the captions “Related Party Transactions” and "Election of Directors" in the proxy statement and possibly elsewhere in the proxy statement (or will be filed by amendment to this report).

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is furnished by incorporation by reference to information under the caption entitled “Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the proxy statement and possibly elsewhere in the proxy statement (or will be filed by amendment to this report).

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements: See the Index to Financial Statements which appears on page F-1 hereof.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules: No schedules are filed herewith because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the information called for is in our Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

(a)(3) Exhibits: Certain of the exhibits to this Report, indicated by an asterisk, are hereby incorporated by reference from other documents on file with the Commission with which they are electronically filed, to be a part hereof as of their respective dates.

3436



Exhibit No.	Description

*3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Denny's Corporation dated March 3, 2003, as amended by Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase Authorized Capitalization dated August 25, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2004).

*3.2	By-Laws of Denny's Corporation, as effective as of May 23, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Denny's Corporation filed with the Commission on June 7, 2013).

+*10.1	Form of stock option agreement to be used under the Denny's Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Denny's Corporation (File No. 333-120093) filed with the Commission on October 29, 2004).

+*10.2	Form of deferred stock unit award certificate to be used under the Denny's Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2004).

+*10.3	Employment Offer Letter dated August 16, 2005 between Denny's Corporation and F. Mark Wolfinger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended September 28, 2005).

+*10.4	Employment Offer Letter dated July 19, 2010 between Denny's Corporation and Frances L. Allen (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended September 29, 2010).

~~+*10.5~~	~~Employment Offer Letter dated~~ January 6, 2011 between Denny's Corporation and John C. Miller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 30, 2011).

*~~10.6~~	Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 2012 among Denny's, Inc., as the Borrower, Denny's Corporation, as Parent, and Certain Subsidiaries of Parent, as Guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, Regions Bank and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, Cadence Bank and RBS Citizens, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, the other lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Regions Capital Markets, a Division of Regions Bank, and GE Capital Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2012).

*10.7	Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated as of April 12, 2012 among Denny's, Inc., Denny's Realty, LLC, Denny's Corporation, DFO, LLC, the other subsidiaries of Parent from time to time party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2012).

*10.810.5	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 24, 2013 among Denny's, Inc., as the Borrower, Denny's Corporation, as Parent, and Certain Subsidiaries of Parent, as Guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, Regions Bank and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Co-Syndication Agents, Cadence Bank N.A., Fifth Third Bank and RBS Citizens, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Regions Capital Markets and GE Capital Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 27, 2013).

*~~10.9~~10.6	Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated as of April 24, 2013 among Denny's, Inc., Denny's Realty, LLC, Denny's Corporation, DFO, LLC, the other Subsidiaries of Parent from time to time party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 27, 2013).



~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Description~~

*~~10.10~~10.7	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 14, 2014 among Denny's, Inc., as the Borrower, Denny's Corporation, as Parent, and each of the Subsidiaries of Parent party thereto, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent on behalf of the Lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended September 24, 2014).

*10.8	Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2015 among Denny's, Inc., as the Borrower, Denny's Corporation, as Parent, and Certain Subsidiaries of Parent, as Guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, Regions Bank and ~~the~~Citizens Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, Cadence Bank, N.A. and Fifth Third Bank, as Co-Documentation Agents, and The Other Lenders Party Hereto, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Regions Capital Markets, a Division of Regions Bank and Citizens Bank, National Association, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended ~~September 24, 2014)~~April 1, 2015).

*10.9	Second Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated as of March 30, 2015 among Denny's, Inc., Denny's Realty, LLC, Denny's Corporation, DFO, LLC, the other Subsidiaries of Parent from time to time party hereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended April 1, 2015).



Exhibit No.	Description

10.10	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 30, 2015 among Denny's, Inc., as the Borrower, Denny's Corporation, as Parent, and each of the Subsidiaries of Parent party thereto, as Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent on behalf of the Lenders.

+*10.11	Denny's Corporation Amended and Restated Executive and Key Employee Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended September 25, 2013).

+*10.12	Denny's Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Definitive Proxy Statement of Denny's Corporation filed with the Commission on April 5, 2012).

+*10.13	Denny's Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Denny's Corporation filed with the Commission on May 27, 2008).

+*10.14	Amendment to the Denny's Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended April 1, 2009).

+*10.15	Denny's Corporation Amended and Restated 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended June 25, 2008).

+*10.16	Form of the 2011 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program Performance Shares and Target Cash Opportunity Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 30, 2011).

~~+*10.17~~	Written Description of the Denny's 2011 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 30, 2011).

~~+*10.18~~	~~Form of the~~ 2012 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program Performance Shares and Target Cash Opportunity Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2012).

+*~~10.19~~10.17	Written Description of the Denny's 2012 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 28, 2012).

+*~~10.20~~10.18	Form of the 2013 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program Performance Shares and Target Cash Opportunity Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 27, 2013).

+*~~10.21~~10.19	Written Description of the Denny's 2013 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 27, 2013).

+*~~10.22~~10.20	Form of the 2014 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program Performance Shares and Target Cash Opportunity Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 26, 2014).



~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Description~~

+*~~10.23~~10.21	Written Description of the Denny's 2014 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended March 26, 2014).

+*10.22	Form of the 2015 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program Performance Share Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended April 1, 2015).

+*10.23	Written Description of the Denny's 2015 Long-Term Performance Incentive Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Denny's Corporation for the quarter ended April 1, 2015).



Exhibit No.	Description

+*10.24	Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2010).

+*10.25	Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2010).

~~+*10.26~~	Denny's Corporate Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 30, 2009).

+~~10.27~~*10.26	Form of deferred stock unit award certificate to be used under the Denny's Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive ~~Plan.~~Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report on From 10-K of Denny's Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014).

10.27	Capped Fixed $$ Discounted Share Buyback ("DSB") With Initial Delivery Confirmation dated November 6, 2015 between Denny's Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

21.1	Subsidiaries of ~~Denny's.~~Denny's Corporation.

23.1	Consent of KPMG LLP.

31.1	Certification of John C. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of F. Mark Wolfinger, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Statement of John C. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of Denny’s Corporation, and F. Mark Wolfinger, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denny’s Corporation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~101.INS^~~101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

~~101.SCH^~~101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

~~101.CAL^~~101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

~~101.LAB^~~101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

~~101.PRE^~~101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

~~101.DEF^~~101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document



+	Denotes management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.



^	~~In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed "furnished" and not "filed."~~

3739

DENNY’S CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8

F - 1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Denny's Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Denny’s Corporation and subsidiaries as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December ~~31, 2014.~~30, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Denny’s Corporation and subsidiaries as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework ~~(1992)~~(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated ~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016

F - 2

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,074		$	2,943		$	1,671		$	3,074
Receivables	18,059			17,321			16,552			18,059
Inventories	2,952			2,881			3,117			2,952
Current deferred tax asset	24,310			23,264
Assets held for sale							931			—
Current deferred income taxes							—			24,310
Prepaid and other current assets	7,676			7,417			14,143			7,676
Total current assets	56,071			53,826			36,414			56,071
Property	109,777			105,620			124,816			109,777
Goodwill	31,451			31,451			33,454			31,451
Intangible assets, net	46,278			47,925			46,074			46,278
Deferred financing costs, net	1,614			2,097			2,529			1,614
Noncurrent deferred tax asset	19,252			28,290
Noncurrent deferred income taxes							29,159			19,252
Other noncurrent assets	25,415			26,568			24,591			25,415
Total assets	$	289,858		$	295,777		$	297,037		$	289,858

Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	4,125		$	3,000		$	—		$	4,125
Current maturities of capital lease obligations	3,609			4,150			3,246			3,609
Accounts payable	13,250			14,237			20,759			13,250
Other current liabilities	59,432			52,698			77,548			59,432
Total current liabilities	80,416			74,085			101,553			80,416
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, less current maturities	135,875			150,000			195,000			135,875
Capital lease obligations, less current maturities	15,204			15,923			17,499			15,204
Liability for insurance claims, less current portion	18,005			18,249			15,949			18,005
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	38,775			29,089			27,631			38,775
Total long-term liabilities	207,859			213,261			256,079			207,859
Total liabilities	288,275			287,346			357,632			288,275

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity
Common stock $0.01 par value; shares authorized - 135,000; December 31, 2014: 105,818 shares issued and 84,707 shares outstanding; December 25, 2013: 105,014 shares issued and 89,232 shares outstanding;	1,058			1,050
Common stock $0.01 par value; shares authorized - 135,000; December 30, 2015: 106,521 shares issued and 76,862 shares outstanding; December 31, 2014: 105,818 shares issued and 84,707 shares outstanding							1,065			1,058
Paid-in capital	571,674			567,505			565,364			571,674
Deficit	(438,221		)	(470,946		)	(402,245		)	(438,221		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(24,602		)	(16,842		)	(23,777		)	(24,602		)
Shareholders’ equity before treasury stock	109,909			80,767			140,407			109,909
Treasury stock, at cost, 21,111 and 15,782 shares, respectively	(108,326		)	(72,336		)
Total shareholders' equity	1,583			8,431
Treasury stock, at cost, 29,659 and 21,111 shares, respectively							(201,002		)	(108,326		)
Total shareholders' (deficit) equity							(60,595		)	1,583
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	289,858		$	295,777		$	297,037		$	289,858

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 3

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income


	Fiscal Year Ended							Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)							(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue:
Company restaurant sales	$	334,684		$	328,334	$	353,710	$	353,073	$	334,684		$	328,334
Franchise and license revenue	137,611			134,259		134,653		138,220		137,611			134,259
Total operating revenue	472,295			462,593		488,363		491,293		472,295			462,593
Costs of company restaurant sales:
Product costs	86,825			85,540		88,473		89,660		86,825			85,540
Payroll and benefits	133,280			131,305		141,303		136,626		133,280			131,305
Occupancy	20,845			21,519		23,405		20,443		20,845			21,519
Other operating expenses	47,858			45,192		49,025		47,628		47,858			45,192
Total costs of company restaurant sales	288,808			283,556		302,206		294,357		288,808			283,556
Costs of franchise and license revenue	44,761			46,109		46,675		43,345		44,761			46,109
General and administrative expenses	58,907			56,835		60,307		66,602		58,907			56,835
Depreciation and amortization	21,218			21,501		22,304		21,472		21,218			21,501
Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net	1,270			7,071		482		2,366		1,270			7,071
Total operating costs and expenses, net	414,964			415,072		431,974		428,142		414,964			415,072
Operating income	57,331			47,521		56,389		63,151		57,331			47,521
Interest expense, net	9,182			10,282		13,369		9,283		9,182			10,282
Other nonoperating (income) expense, net	(612		)	1,139		7,926
Other nonoperating expense (income), net								139		(612		)	1,139
Net income before income taxes	48,761			36,100		35,094		53,729		48,761			36,100
Provision for income taxes	16,036			11,528		12,785		17,753		16,036			11,528
Net income	$	32,725		$	24,572	$	22,309	$	35,976	$	32,725		$	24,572

Basic net income per share	$	0.38		$	0.27	$	0.23	$	0.44	$	0.38		$	0.27
Diluted net income per share	$	0.37		$	0.26	$	0.23	$	0.42	$	0.37		$	0.26

Basic weighted average shares outstanding	86,323			90,829		94,949		82,627		86,323			90,829
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	88,355			92,903		96,754		84,729		88,355			92,903

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 4

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014 December 25, 2013 December 26, 2012
(In thousands)
Net income $ 32,725
$ 24,572
$ 22,309
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(4,019), $4,164 and $(191) (6,304 ) 6,309
(186 )
Recognition of unrealized (loss) gain on hedge transaction, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(933) and $1,184 (1,456 ) 1,848
—
Other comprehensive (loss) income (7,760 ) 8,157
(186 )
Total comprehensive income $ 24,965
$ 32,729
$ 22,123



	Fiscal Year Ended
	December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	35,976		$	32,725		$	24,572
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax expense (benefit) of $1,425, $(4,019) and $4,164	2,230			(6,304		)	6,309
Recognition of unrealized (loss) gain on hedge transactions, net of tax (benefit) expense of $(898), $(933) and $1,184	(1,405		)	(1,456		)	1,848
Other comprehensive income (loss)	825			(7,760		)	8,157
Total comprehensive income	$	36,801		$	24,965		$	32,729

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 5

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity


	Common Stock			Treasury Stock					Paid-in						Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total Shareholders’ Equity /			Common Stock			Treasury Stock					Paid-in						Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total Shareholders’ Equity /
	Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			(Deficit)			Loss, Net			(Deficit)			Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			(Deficit)			Loss, Net			(Deficit)
	(In thousands)																				(In thousands)
Balance, December 28, 2011	102,668	$	1,027	(6,696	)	$	(25,459	)	$	557,396		$	(517,827	)	$	(24,813	)	$	(9,676	)
Net income	—	—		—		—			—			22,309			—			22,309
Other comprehensive loss	—	—		—		—			—			—			(186		)	(186		)
Share-based compensation on equity classified awards	—	—		—		—			2,082			—			—			2,082
Purchase of treasury stock	—	—		(4,839	)	(22,179		)	—			—			—			(22,179		)
Issuance of common stock for share-based compensation	253	3		—		—			(3		)	—			—			—
Exercise of common stock options	843	8		—		—			2,172			—			—			2,180
Tax benefit from share-based compensation	—	—		—		—			1,010			—			—			1,010
Balance, December 26, 2012	103,764	1,038		(11,535	)	(47,638		)	562,657			(495,518		)	(24,999		)	(4,460		)	103,764	1,038		(11,535	)	(47,638		)	562,657			(495,518		)	(24,999		)	(4,460		)
Net income	—	—		—		—			—			24,572			—			24,572			—	—		—		—			—			24,572			—			24,572
Other comprehensive income	—	—		—		—			—			—			8,157			8,157			—	—		—		—			—			—			8,157			8,157
Share-based compensation on equity classified awards	—	—		—		—			2,292			—			—			2,292			—	—		—		—			2,292			—			—			2,292
Purchase of treasury stock	—	—		(4,247	)	(24,698		)	—			—			—			(24,698		)	—	—		(4,247	)	(24,698		)	—			—			—			(24,698		)
Issuance of common stock for share-based compensation	351	3		—		—			(3		)	—			—			—			351	3		—		—			(3		)	—			—			—
Exercise of common stock options	899	9		—		—			2,946			—			—			2,955			899	9		—		—			2,946			—			—			2,955
Tax expense from share-based compensation	—	—		—		—			(387		)	—			—			(387		)	—	—		—		—			(387		)	—			—			(387		)
Balance, December 25, 2013	105,014	1,050		(15,782	)	(72,336		)	567,505			(470,946		)	(16,842		)	8,431			105,014	1,050		(15,782	)	(72,336		)	567,505			(470,946		)	(16,842		)	8,431
Net income	—	—		—		—			—			32,725			—			32,725			—	—		—		—			—			32,725			—			32,725
Other comprehensive loss	—	—		—		—			—			—			(7,760		)	(7,760		)	—	—		—		—			—			—			(7,760		)	(7,760		)
Share-based compensation on equity classified awards	—	—		—		—			2,345			—			—			2,345			—	—		—		—			2,345			—			—			2,345
Purchase of treasury stock	—	—		(5,329	)	(35,990		)	—			—			—			(35,990		)	—	—		(5,329	)	(35,990		)	—			—			—			(35,990		)
Issuance of common stock for share-based compensation	151	1		—		—			(1		)	—			—			—			151	1		—		—			(1		)	—			—			—
Exercise of common stock options	653	7		—		—			2,162			—			—			2,169			653	7		—		—			2,162			—			—			2,169
Tax expense from share-based compensation	—	—		—		—			(337		)	—			—			(337		)	—	—		—		—			(337		)	—			—			(337		)
Balance, December 31, 2014	105,818	$	1,058	(21,111	)	$	(108,326	)	$	571,674		$	(438,221	)	$	(24,602	)	$	1,583		105,818	$	1,058	(21,111	)	$	(108,326	)	$	571,674		$	(438,221	)	$	(24,602	)	$	1,583
Net income																					—	—		—		—			—			35,976			—			35,976
Other comprehensive income																					—	—		—		—			—			—			825			825
Share-based compensation on equity classified awards																					—	—		—		—			3,428			—			—			3,428
Purchase of treasury stock																					—	—		(8,548	)	(92,676		)	—			—			—			(92,676		)
Equity forward contract																					—	—		—		—			(13,111		)	—			—			(13,111		)
Issuance of common stock for share-based compensation																					503	5		—		—			(5		)	—			—			—
Exercise of common stock options																					200	2		—		—			730			—			—			732
Tax benefit from share-based compensation																					—	—		—		—			2,648			—			—			2,648
Balance, December 30, 2015																					106,521	$	1,065	(29,659	)	$	(201,002	)	$	565,364		$	(402,245	)	$	(23,777	)	$	(60,595	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	32,725		$	24,572		$	22,309		$	35,976		$	32,725		$	24,572
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	21,218			21,501			22,304			21,472			21,218			21,501
Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net	1,270			7,071			482			2,366			1,270			7,071
Amortization of deferred financing costs	483			497			775			507			483			497
Amortization of debt discount	—			—			137
(Gain) loss on early extinguishments of debt	(33		)	2,226			8,290
(Gain) loss on interest rate hedges	(11		)	42			61
Loss (gain) on early extinguishments of debt										225			(33		)	2,226
(Gain) loss on the change in fair value of interest rate caps										—			(11		)	42
Deferred income tax expense	13,215			9,100			11,423			14,006			13,215			9,100
Reversal of tax valuation allowance	(270		)	(420		)	(661		)	(130		)	(270		)	(420		)
Share-based compensation	5,846			4,852			3,496			6,635			5,846			4,852
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Receivables	(1,119		)	116			(1,740		)	1,440			(1,119		)	116
Inventories	(71		)	9			548			(166		)	(71		)	9
Other current assets	(259		)	984			2,820			(6,466		)	(259		)	984
Other assets	(2,118		)	(2,110		)	(3,172		)	(78		)	(2,118		)	(2,110		)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,561			(5,520		)	(1,217		)	2,345			1,561			(5,520		)
Accrued salaries and vacations	2,648			(2,545		)	2,279			4,060			2,648			(2,545		)
Accrued taxes	871			101			(747		)	182			871			101
Other accrued liabilities	114			(746		)	(4,420		)	9,479			114			(746		)
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	(1,159		)	(2,688		)	(3,763		)	(11,216		)	(1,159		)	(2,688		)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	74,911			57,042			59,204			80,637			74,911			57,042
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(22,076		)	(16,818		)	(14,164		)	(26,977		)	(22,076		)	(16,818		)
Acquisition of restaurants and real estate	—			(3,980		)	(1,422		)	(5,803		)	—			(3,980		)
Proceeds from disposition of property	64			1,582			15,555			95			64			1,582
Collections on notes receivable	2,289			4,779			1,970			1,740			2,289			4,779
Issuance of notes receivable	(1,566		)	(2,033		)	(5,440		)	(1,790		)	(1,566		)	(2,033		)
Net cash flows used in investing activities	(21,289		)	(16,470		)	(3,501		)	(32,735		)	(21,289		)	(16,470		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Revolver borrowings	32,200			124,200			—			231,000			32,200			124,200
Revolver payments	(42,200		)	(28,950		)	—			(121,250		)	(42,200		)	(28,950		)
Term loan borrowings	—			60,000			190,000			—			—			60,000
Long-term debt payments	(7,237		)	(176,729		)	(222,741		)	(58,344		)	(7,237		)	(176,729		)
Debt transaction costs	—			(366		)	(1,097		)	—			—			(366		)
Deferred financing costs	—			(1,374		)	(1,809		)	(1,716		)	—			(1,374		)
Purchase of treasury stock	(36,058		)	(25,039		)	(21,618		)	(92,644		)	(36,058		)	(25,039		)
Purchase of equity forward contract										(13,111		)	—			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	2,169			2,955			2,180			732			2,169			2,955
Tax withholding on share-based payments	(419		)	(796		)	(327		)	(982		)	(419		)	(796		)
Tax (expense) benefit for share-based compensation	(337		)	(387		)	1,010
Tax benefit (expense) for share-based compensation										2,648			(337		)	(387		)
Net bank overdrafts	(1,609		)	(4,708		)	(1,476		)	4,362			(1,609		)	(4,708		)
Net cash flows used in financing activities	(53,491		)	(51,194		)	(55,878		)	(49,305		)	(53,491		)	(51,194		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	131			(10,622		)	(175		)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents										(1,403		)	131			(10,622		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	2,943			13,565			13,740			3,074			2,943			13,565
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,074		$	2,943		$	13,565		$	1,671		$	3,074		$	2,943

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

Denny’s Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Reporting

Denny’s Corporation, or Denny’s, is one of America’s largest franchised full-service restaurant chains based on number of restaurants. Denny’s restaurants are operated in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, two U.S. territories and ~~nine~~ten foreign countries with principal concentrations in California (~~24%~~23% of total restaurants), Texas (11%) and Florida (8%).

At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, the Denny's brand consisted of ~~1,702~~1,710 restaurants, ~~1,541~~1,546 of which were franchised/licensed restaurants and ~~161~~164 of which were company operated.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The following accounting policies significantly affect the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements:

Use of Estimates. In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make certain assumptions and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the disclosure of contingencies. In making these assumptions and estimates, management may from time to time seek advice and consider information provided by actuaries and other experts in a particular area. Actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates.

Consolidation Policy. Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the financial statements of Denny’s Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Denny’s, Inc., DFO, LLC and Denny's Realty, LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Year. Our fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in December. As a result, a fifty-third week is added to a fiscal year every five or six years. Fiscal 2014 included 53 weeks of operations, whereas ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012~~2013 each included 52 weeks of operations.

~~Reclassifications.The prior year proceeds and repayments of the revolving credit facility have been reclassified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to conform to the current gross basis presentation.~~

Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments. Our policy is to invest cash in excess of operating requirements in short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, which we consider to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments of $~~5.0~~0.9 million and $~~5.3~~5.0 million at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, respectively.

Receivables. Receivables, which are recorded at net realizable value, primarily consist of trade accounts receivables and financing receivables from franchisees (together “franchisee receivables”), vendor receivables and credit card receivables. Trade accounts receivables from franchisees consist of royalties, advertising and rent. Financing receivables from franchisees primarily consist of notes from franchisees related to the roll-out of new POS equipment. We accrue interest on notes receivable based on the contractual terms. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on pre-defined criteria and management’s judgment of existing receivables. Receivables that are ultimately deemed to be uncollectible, and for which collection efforts have been exhausted, are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventories. Inventories consist of food and beverages and are valued primarily at the lower of average cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Property and Depreciation. Owned property is stated at cost. Property under capital leases is stated at the lesser of its fair value or the net present value of the related minimum lease payments at the lease inception. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. We depreciate owned property over its estimated useful life using the straight-line method. We amortize property held under capital leases (at capitalized value) over the lesser of its estimated useful life or the initial lease term. In certain situations, one or more option periods may be used in determining the depreciable life of certain leasehold improvements under operating lease agreements, if we deem that an economic penalty will be incurred and exercise of such option periods is reasonably assured. In either circumstance, our policy requires lease term consistency when calculating the depreciation period, in classifying the lease and in computing rent expense. Building assets are assigned estimated useful lives that range from five

~~F - 8~~

to 30 years. Equipment assets are assigned lives that range from two to ten years. Leasehold improvements are generally assigned lives between five and 15 years limited by the expected lease term.

F - 8

Goodwill. Amounts recorded as goodwill primarily represent excess reorganization value recognized as a result of our 1998 bankruptcy. We record goodwill in connection with the acquisition of restaurants from franchisees. Likewise, upon the sale of restaurant operations to franchisees, goodwill is decremented. We test goodwill for impairment at each fiscal year end, and more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may exist. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, a significant decline in our expected future cash flows; a significant adverse decline in our stock price; significantly adverse legal developments; and a significant change in the business climate.

Other Intangible Assets. Other intangible assets consist primarily of trade names, franchise and license agreements, and reacquired franchise rights. Trade names are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets and are not amortized. Franchise and license agreements and reacquired franchise rights are amortized using the straight-line basis over the term of the related agreement. We test trade name assets for impairment at each fiscal year end, and more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may exist. We assess impairment of franchise and license agreements and reacquired franchise rights whenever changes or events indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Costs incurred to renew or extend the term of recognized intangible assets are recorded in general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Long-term Investments. Long-term investments include nonqualified deferred compensation plan assets held in a rabbi trust. Each plan participant's account is comprised of their contribution, our matching contribution and each participant's share of earnings or losses in the plan. The investments of the rabbi trust include debt and equity mutual funds. They are considered trading securities and are reported at fair value in other noncurrent assets with an offsetting liability included in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to the investments are recorded in other income (expense) with an offsetting amount recorded in general and administrative expenses related to the liability in our Consolidated Statements of Income. During ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, we incurred net gains of $~~0.5~~0.1 million, $~~1.1~~0.5 million and $~~0.7~~1.1 million, respectively. The fair value of the deferred compensation plan investments were $~~9.3~~10.2 million and $~~8.2~~9.3 million at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs. Costs related to the issuance of debt are deferred and amortized as a component of interest expense using the effective interest method over the terms of the respective debt issuances.

Cash Overdrafts. ~~There were~~ no ~~cash overdrafts at~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~. Accounts payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets include cash overdrafts of ~~$1.6~~$4.4 million at December ~~25, 2013~~.30, 2015. There were no cash overdrafts at December 31, 2014. Changes in such amounts are reflected in cash flows from financing activities in ~~the~~our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Self-insurance ~~liabilities.~~Liabilities. We record liabilities for insurance claims during periods in which we have been insured under large deductible programs or have been self-insured for our medical claims and workers’ compensation, general/product and automobile insurance liabilities. The liabilities for prior and current estimated incurred losses are discounted to their present value based on expected loss payment patterns determined by independent actuaries using our actual historical payments. These estimates include assumptions regarding claims frequency and severity as well as changes in our business environment, medical costs and the regulatory environment that could impact our overall self-insurance costs.

Total discounted workers’ compensation, general/product and automobile insurance liabilities at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014 were $~~23.1~~21.1 million and $~~23.8~~23.1 million, respectively, with each reflecting a 1.0% discount rate. The related undiscounted amounts at such dates were $~~23.7~~21.6 million and $~~24.4~~23.7 million, respectively.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We early adopted ASU 2015-17 with prospective application. As a result, all deferred taxes are reported as noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 30, 2015. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. A valuation allowance reduces our net deferred tax ~~assets~~asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of our provision for incomes taxes, in the resulting tax liabilities, and in the recoverability of deferred tax assets.

Leases and Subleases. Our policy requires the use of a consistent lease term for ~~(i)~~ calculating the ~~maximum~~ depreciation period for related buildings and leasehold ~~improvements; (ii)~~improvements, classifying the ~~lease;~~lease and ~~(iii)~~ computing periodic rent expense increases where the lease terms include escalations in rent over the lease term. The lease term commences on the date we gain access to and control over the leased property. We account for rent escalations in leases on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. Any rent holidays after lease commencement are recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, which includes the rent holiday period. Leasehold improvements that have been funded by lessors have historically

~~F - 9~~

been insignificant. Any leasehold improvements we make that are funded by lessor incentives or allowances under operating leases are recorded as leasehold improvement assets and amortized over the expected lease term. Such incentives are also recorded as deferred rent and

F - 9

amortized as reductions to lease expense over the expected lease term. We record contingent rent expense based on estimated sales for respective restaurants over the contingency period. Contingent rental income is recognized when earned.

Fair Value Measurements. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses are deemed to approximate fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of notes receivable approximates the carrying value after consideration of recorded allowances and related risk-based interest rates. The liabilities under our credit facility are carried at historical cost. The estimated fair value (Level 2) of our senior secured term loan, ~~approximates~~held as of December 31, 2014, approximated its carrying value. The fair value of our long-term debt is determined based on market prices or, if market prices are not available, the present value of the underlying cash flows discounted at market rates.

Employee Benefit Plans. Due to our early adoption of ASU 2015-04, beginning with fiscal year 2015, we measure and recognize the funded status of our defined benefit plans in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31. That date represents the month-end that is closest to our fiscal year-end. The funded status is adjusted for any contributions or significant events (such as a plan amendment, settlement, or curtailment that calls for a remeasurement) that occurs between our fiscal year-end and December 31.

Derivative Instruments. We use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate risk. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All derivatives are recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value based upon quoted market prices. Changes in the fair values of derivatives are recorded in earnings or other comprehensive income ("OCI"), based on whether the instrument is designated as a hedge transaction. Gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in ~~other comprehensive income~~OCI are classified to earnings in the period the hedged item affects earnings. If the underlying hedge transaction ceases to exist, any associated amounts reported in ~~other comprehensive income~~OCI are reclassified to earnings at that time. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings in the current period. By entering into derivative instruments, we are exposed to counterparty credit risk. When the fair value of a derivative instrument is in an asset position, the counterparty has a liability to us, which creates credit risk for us. We manage our exposure to this risk by selecting counterparties with investment grade credit ratings and regularly monitoring our market position with each counterparty.

Contingencies and Litigation. We are subject to legal proceedings involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business, as well as legal proceedings that are nonroutine and include compensatory or punitive damage claims. Our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such matters cannot be estimated with certainty and requires the use of estimates in recording liabilities for potential litigation settlements. When the reasonable estimate is a range, the recorded loss will be the best estimate within the range. We record legal settlement costs as other operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income as those costs are incurred.

Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income includes net income and ~~other comprehensive income~~OCI items that are excluded from net income under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. ~~Other comprehensive income~~OCI items include additional minimum pension liability adjustments and the effective unrealized portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges.

Segment. Denny’s operates in only one segment. All significant revenues and pre-tax earnings relate to retail sales of food and beverages to the general public through either company or franchised restaurants.

Company Restaurant Sales. Company restaurant sales are recognized when food and beverage products are sold at company restaurants. We present company restaurant sales net of sales taxes.

Gift cards. We sell gift cards which have no stated expiration dates. We recognize revenue from gift cards when the gift card is redeemed by the customer or when we determine the likelihood of redemption is remote (gift card breakage). Breakage is based on our company-specific historical redemption patterns. We recognized $~~0.4~~0.3 million, ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million and $0.3 million in breakage on gift cards during ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, respectively. We believe that the amounts recognized for breakage have been and will continue to be insignificant.

F - 10

Franchise and License Fees. We recognize initial franchise and license fees when all of the material obligations have been performed and conditions have been satisfied, typically when operations of a new franchised restaurant have commenced. Continuing fees, such as royalties and rents, are recorded as income. Royalties are recognized in the period in which the sales occurred. During ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, we recorded initial fees of $~~1.9~~2.3 million, $~~1.6~~1.8 million and $~~3.0~~1.6 million, respectively, as a component of franchise and license revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income. At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, deferred fees were $~~1.6~~1.9 million and $~~1.1~~1.6 million, respectively, and are included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. For ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, our ten largest franchisees accounted for ~~32%~~29%, 32% and 32% of our franchise ~~revenues.~~revenues, respectively.

Advertising Costs. We expense production costs for radio and television advertising in the year in which the commercials are initially aired. Advertising expense for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 was $~~12.3~~12.5 million, $~~11.7~~12.3 million and $~~13.4~~11.7 million, respectively, net of contributions from franchisees to our advertising programs, including local co-operatives, of ~~$70.3~~$72.5 million,, $70.3 million and $66.6 ~~million~~

~~F - 10~~

~~and~~ ~~$65.1~~ million, respectively. Advertising costs are recorded as a component of other operating expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Restructuring and ~~exit costs.~~Exit Costs. Restructuring and exit costs consist primarily of the costs of future obligations related to closed restaurants, severance and other restructuring charges for terminated employees, and are included as a component of operating (gains), losses and other charges, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Discounted liabilities for future lease costs and the fair value of related subleases of closed restaurants are recorded when the restaurants are closed. All other costs related to closed restaurants are expensed as incurred. In assessing the discounted liabilities for future costs of obligations related to closed restaurants, we make assumptions regarding amounts of future assumed subleases. If these assumptions or their related estimates change in the future, we may be required to record additional exit costs or reduce exit costs previously recorded. Exit costs recorded for each of the periods presented include the effect of such changes in estimates.

We evaluate restaurant closures for potential disclosure as discontinued operations based on an assessment of several quantitative and qualitative factors, including the nature of the closure, revenue migration to other company and franchised restaurants and planned market development in the vicinity of the disposed restaurant.

Disposal or Impairment of Long-lived Assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment at the restaurant level on a quarterly basis, when assets are identified as held for sale or whenever changes or events indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. For assets identified as held for sale, we use the market approach and consider proceeds from similar asset sales. We assess impairment of restaurant-level assets based on the operating cash flows of the restaurant, expected proceeds from the sale of assets and our plans for restaurant closings. Generally, all restaurants with negative cash flows from operations for the most recent twelve months at each quarter end are included in our assessment. For underperforming assets, we use the income approach to determine both the recoverability and estimated fair value of the assets. To estimate future cash flows, we make certain assumptions about expected future operating performance, such as revenue growth, operating margins, risk-adjusted discount rates, and future economic and market conditions. If the long-lived assets of a restaurant are not recoverable based upon estimated future, undiscounted cash flows, we write the assets down to their fair value. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges. These charges are included as a component of operating (gains), losses and other charges, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Assets held for sale consist of real estate properties and/or restaurant operations that we expect to sell within the next year. The assets are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. We cease recording depreciation on assets that are classified as held for sale. If the determination is made that we no longer expect to sell an asset within the next year, the asset is reclassified out of held for sale.

Discontinued Operations. We evaluate restaurant closures and assets reclassified to assets held for sale for potential disclosure as discontinued operations. Only disposals resulting in a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial results are reported as discontinued operations. There were no such disposals, nor any disposals of individually significant components. The gains and losses related to restaurant closures and assets reclassified to assets held for sale are included as a component of operating (gain), losses and other charges, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Gains on Sales of Restaurants Operations to Franchisees, Real Estate and Other Assets. Generally, gains on sales of restaurant operations to franchisees (which may include real estate), real estate properties and other assets are recognized when the sales are consummated and certain other gain recognition criteria are met. Total gains are included as a component of operating (gains), losses and other charges, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

F - 11

Share-Based Compensation. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period. We estimate potential forfeitures of share-based awards and adjust the forfeiture rate over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Share-based compensation expense is included as a component of general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Tax expense or benefit recognized related to share-based compensation is included as a component of provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Any tax expense or benefit in excess of recognized compensation cost is reported as a financing activity onin our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Compensation expense for options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Generally, compensation expense related to restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and board deferred stock units is based on the number of shares and units expected to vest, the period over which they are expected to vest and the fair market value of ~~the~~our common stock on the date of the grant. For restricted stock units and performance shares that contain a market condition, compensation expense is based on the Monte Carlo valuation method, which utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the Company achieving the market condition and the fair value of the award. The key assumptions used include expected volatility and risk-free interest rates over the term of the award. The amount of certain cash-settled awards is determined based on the date of payment. Therefore, compensation expense related to these cash-settled awards is adjusted to fair value at each balance sheet date.

Subsequent to the vesting period, earned stock-settled restricted stock units and performance shares (both of which are equity classified) are paid to the holder in shares of our common stock, and the cash-settled restricted stock units and performance units

~~F - 11~~

~~(both~~ (both of which are liability classified) are paid to the holder in cash, provided the holder is then still employed with Denny’s or an affiliate.

Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period.

Newly Adopted Accounting Standards ~~to be Adopted.~~

Discontinued Operations

ASU 2014-08, "Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity"

~~In April 2014, the FASB issued~~Effective January 1, 2015, we adopted ASU 2014-08, which raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and modifies the related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, only disposals resulting in a strategic shift that will have a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 also removes the requirement that an entity not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after disposal to qualify for reporting of the disposal as a discontinued operation. ~~The~~This guidance ~~is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014 (our fiscal 2015), with early adoption permitted for any disposal transaction not previously reported. We~~requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components that do not ~~believe~~meet the definition of discontinued operations. The adoption of this guidance ~~will~~did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Defined Benefit Plans

ASU 2015-04,"Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets"

Effective October 1, 2015, we early adopted ASU 2015-04, which provides a practical expedient for entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end. The practical expedient permits an entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end. As a result of our early adoption, the date used to measure our fiscal year 2015 plan assets and obligations for all plans is December 31, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

F - 12

Income Taxes

ASU 2015-17,"Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes"

In November, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which simplifies the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. We early adopted this guidance as of December 30, 2015 on a prospective basis. Therefore, as a result of our early adoption, all deferred taxes are reported as noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 30, 2015. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

Accounting Standards to be Adopted

Revenue Recognition

ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and

ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date"

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, which clarifies the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The new guidance requires companies to recognize revenue when it transfers goods or service to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014-09~~2015-14, which defers the effective date for ASU 2014-09. The guidance is now effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~2017 (our fiscal ~~2017)~~2018). The guidance allows for either a ~~"full retrospective" adoption~~retrospective or ~~a "modified retrospective" adoption, however early adoption~~cumulative effect transition method. Early application is ~~not permitted.~~permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating the ~~adoption~~transition methods and the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial ~~statements, however we do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial~~ statements.

~~Share-Based Compensation~~Consolidation

ASU ~~2014-12, "Compensation—Stock Compensation~~2015-02,"Consolidation (Topic ~~718)~~810): ~~Accounting for Share-Based Payments When~~Amendments to the ~~Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)"~~Consolidation Analysis"

In ~~June 2014,~~February 2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2014-12,~~2015-02, which ~~clarifies~~improves targeted areas of the ~~accounting for share-based payments when~~consolidation guidance and reduces the ~~terms~~number of ~~an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. ASI 2014-12~~consolidation models. ASU 2015-02 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 (our fiscal 2016) with early adoption permitted. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial ~~statements,~~statements.

~~Going Concern~~Debt Issuance

ASU ~~2014-15, "Disclosure~~2015-03,"Interest—Imputation of ~~Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability~~Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" and ASU 2015-15,"Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements—Amendments to ~~Continue as a Going Concern"~~SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting (SEC Update)"

In ~~August 2014,~~April 2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014-15,~~2015-03, which simplifies the guidance on the presentation of debt issuance costs. The new guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 (our fiscal 2016) with early adoption permitted. The new guidance is to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, which addresses the SEC's comments related to the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 related to line-of-credit arrangements. The SEC would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have any impact on our consolidated financial statements and we expect to continue to classify debt issuance costs as an asset.

F - 13

Intangibles

ASU 2015-05,"Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement"

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, which provides guidance about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a software license is included, the customer should account for the license consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a software license is not included, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. ASU 2015-05 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015 (our fiscal 2016) with early adoption permitted. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Inventory

ASU 2015-11,"Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory"

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, which requires ~~management~~inventory that is measured using the first-in, first-out method to ~~evaluate whether there~~be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is ~~substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue~~defined as ~~a going concern~~the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and ~~to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. ASU 2014-15~~transportation. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (our fiscal 2017) with early adoption permitted. We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Leases

ASU 2016-02,"Leases (Topic 842)"

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which provides guidance for accounting for leases. The new guidance requires companies to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets. The accounting guidance for lessors is largely unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (our fiscal 2019) with early adoption permitted. It is to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.

We reviewed all other newly issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they are either not applicable to our business or are not expected to have a material effect on ~~the~~our financial statements as a result of future adoption.

~~F - 12~~

Note 3. Receivables

Receivables, net were comprised of the following:


	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Current assets:
Receivables:
Trade accounts receivable from franchisees	$	10,929		$	10,072		$	10,591		$	10,929
Notes receivable from franchisees and third parties	1,419			1,800
Notes receivable from franchisees							1,352			1,419
Vendor receivables	2,534			2,516			3,049			2,534
Credit card receivables	1,661			2,162			1,606			1,661
Other	1,816			1,002			251			1,816
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(300		)	(231		)	(297		)	(300		)
Total current receivables, net	$	18,059		$	17,321		$	16,552		$	18,059

Noncurrent assets (included as a component of other noncurrent assets):
Notes receivable from franchisees	$	425		$	766		$	541		$	425

F - 14

Note 4. Property, Net

Property, net consisted of the following:


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Land	$	27,198	$	27,198	$	29,856	$	27,198
Buildings and leasehold improvements	233,339		229,918		238,134		233,339
Other property and equipment	77,493		75,740		77,392		77,493
Total property owned	338,030		332,856		345,382		338,030
Less accumulated depreciation	241,678		241,257		235,967		241,678
Property owned, net	96,352		91,599		109,415		96,352
Buildings, vehicles and other equipment held under capital leases	26,836		28,730		27,429		26,836
Less accumulated amortization	13,411		14,709		12,028		13,411
Property held under capital leases, net	13,425		14,021		15,401		13,425
Total property, net	$	109,777	$	105,620	$	124,816	$	109,777

The following table reflects the property assets, included in the table above, which were leased to franchisees:


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Land	$	14,977	$	14,977	$	16,192	$	14,977
Buildings and leasehold improvements	63,098		64,458		61,551		63,098
Total property owned, leased to franchisees	78,075		79,435		77,743		78,075
Less accumulated depreciation	53,994		54,473		52,872		53,994
Property owned, leased to franchisees, net	24,081		24,962		24,871		24,081
Buildings held under capital leases, leased to franchisees	7,251		10,206		4,573		7,251
Less accumulated amortization	5,208		7,345		3,003		5,208
Property held under capital leases, leased to franchisees, net	2,043		2,861		1,570		2,043
Total property leased to franchisees, net	$	26,124	$	27,823	$	26,441	$	26,124

~~F - 13~~

Depreciation expense, including amortization of property under capital leases, for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 was $~~19.2~~20.0 million, $~~18.6~~19.2 million and $~~19.1~~18.6 million, respectively. Substantially all owned property is pledged as collateral for our Credit Facility. See Note 10.

Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table reflects the changes in carrying amounts of goodwill:


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	31,451	$	31,430		$	31,451		$	31,451
Additions related to acquisitions	—		28			2,050			—
Write-offs and reclassifications associated with sale of restaurants	—		(7		)
Write-offs and reclassifications associated with the sale of restaurants						(47		)	—
Balance, end of year	$	31,451	$	31,451		$	33,454		$	31,451

F - 15

Other intangible assets were comprised of the following:


	December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013				December 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
Trade names	$	44,065	$	—	$	44,055	$	—	$	44,068	$	—	$	44,065	$	—
Liquor licenses	126		—		126		—		126		—		126		—
Intangible assets with definite lives:
Franchise and license agreements	22,366		21,426		31,248		29,007		12,237		12,026		22,366		21,426
Reacquired franchise rights	1,857		710		1,857		354		2,823		1,154		1,857		710
Intangible assets	$	68,414	$	22,136	$	77,286	$	29,361	$	59,254	$	13,180	$	68,414	$	22,136

The $~~8.9~~10.1 million decrease in franchise and license agreements primarily resulted from the removal of fully amortized agreements. The amortization expense for definite-lived intangibles and other assets for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 was $~~2.1~~1.5 million, $~~2.9~~2.1 million and $~~3.2~~2.9 million, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for intangible assets with definite lives in the next five years is as follows:


	(In thousands)		(In thousands)
2015	$	1,072
2016	400		$	646
2017	119		230
2018	52		163
2019	52		163
2020			160

We performed an annual impairment test as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and determined that none of the recorded goodwill or other intangible assets with indefinite lives were impaired.

~~F - 14~~

Note 6. Other Current Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following:


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Accrued salaries and vacation	$	23,928	$	18,810	$	30,549	$	23,928
Accrued insurance, primarily current portion of liability for insurance claims	6,340		7,519		7,076		6,340
Accrued taxes	7,129		6,258		7,311		7,129
Accrued advertising	8,027		6,791		7,737		8,027
Gift cards	4,017		4,057
Accrued pension					9,648		224
Other	9,991		9,263		15,227		13,784
Other current liabilities	59,432		52,698		77,548		59,432

F - 16

Note 7. Operating (Gains), Losses and Other Charges, Net

Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net were comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Gains on sales of assets and other, net	$	(112	)	$	(66	)	$	(7,090	)	$	(93	)	$	(112	)	$	(66	)
Restructuring charges and exit costs	981			1,389			3,912			1,524			981			1,389
Impairment charges	401			5,748			3,660			935			401			5,748
Operating (gains), losses and other charges, net	$	1,270		$	7,071		$	482		$	2,366		$	1,270		$	7,071

Restructuring charges and exit costs were comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Exit costs	$	335	$	630	$	1,926	$	697	$	335	$	630
Severance and other restructuring charges	646		759		1,986		827		646		759
Total restructuring charges and exit costs	$	981	$	1,389	$	3,912	$	1,524	$	981	$	1,389

~~Severance and other restructuring charges of $2.0 million for 2012 includes charges related to the departure of the Company's former Chief Operating Officer.~~

~~F - 15~~

The components of the change in accrued exit cost liabilities were as follows:


	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Balance, beginning of year	$	3,149		$	4,061		$	2,142		$	3,149
Exit costs (1)	335			630			697			335
Payments, net of sublease receipts	(1,426		)	(1,726		)	(932		)	(1,426		)
Reclassification of certain lease liabilities, net	(95		)	(69		)	—			(95		)
Interest accretion	179			253			136			179
Balance, end of year	2,142			3,149			2,043			2,142
Less current portion included in other current liabilities	483			1,260			550			483
Long-term portion included in other noncurrent liabilities	$	1,659		$	1,889		$	1,493		$	1,659


(1)	Included as a component of operating (gains), losses and other charges, net.

Estimated net cash payments related to exit cost liabilities in the next five years are as follows:


	(In thousands)		(In thousands)
2015	$	596
2016	346		$	680
2017	289		397
2018	301		353
2019	272		276
2020			194
Thereafter	901		631
Total	2,705		2,531
Less imputed interest	563		488
Present value of exit cost liabilities	$	2,142	$	2,043

F - 17

The present value of exit cost liabilities is net of $~~2.4~~2.2 million of existing sublease arrangements and $~~1.4~~1.1 million related to properties for which we assume we will enter into sublease agreements in the future. See Note 8 for a schedule of future minimum lease commitments and amounts to be received as lessor or sub-lessor for both open and closed restaurants.

Impairment charges of $~~0.4~~0.9 million for the year ended December 30, 2015 resulted primarily from the impairment of restaurants identified as assets held for sale. Impairment charges of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 resulted primarily from the impairment of an underperforming restaurant. Impairment charges of $5.7 million for the year ended December 25, 2013 resulted primarily from the $4.8 million impairment of an underperforming restaurant and the $0.8 million impairment of restaurants and a piece of real estate identified as assets held for sale. ~~Impairment charges of~~ ~~$3.7 million~~ ~~for the year ended~~ ~~December 26, 2012~~ ~~resulted primarily from the impairment of seven restaurants identified as held for sale and the impairment of an underperforming restaurant.~~

Note 8. Leases

Our operations utilize property, facilities and equipment leased from others. Buildings and facilities are primarily used for restaurants and support facilities. Many of our restaurants are operated under lease arrangements which generally provide for a fixed ~~basic~~base rent, and, in many instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross revenues. Initial terms of land and restaurant building leases generally range from 10 to 15 years, exclusive of options to renew, which are typically for five year periods. Leases of other equipment consist primarily of restaurant equipment, computer systems and vehicles.

~~F - 16~~

Minimum future lease commitments and amounts to be received as lessor or sublessor under non-cancelable leases, including leases for both open and closed restaurants, at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 were as follows:


	Commitments				Lease Receipts		Commitments				Lease Receipts
	Capital		Operating		Operating		Capital		Operating		Operating
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
2015	$	6,451	$	31,904	$	30,610
2016	5,561		29,473		28,546		$	6,973	$	30,157	$	28,641
2017	4,967		26,658		26,531		6,540		27,564		26,683
2018	3,738		22,376		23,072		5,405		23,681		23,563
2019	2,970		18,145		19,062		4,673		19,649		19,617
2020							3,997		15,215		16,108
Thereafter	9,306		65,611		97,165		16,658		54,514		84,836
Total	32,993		$	194,167	$	224,986	44,246		$	170,780	$	199,448
Less imputed interest	14,180						23,501
Present value of capital lease obligations	$	18,813					$	20,745

Rent expense is a component of both occupancy expense and costs of franchise and license revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Lease and sublease rental income is a component of franchise and license revenue in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Rental expense and income were comprised of the following:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Rental expense:
Base rents	$	33,402	$	35,667	$	38,326	$	30,749	$	33,402	$	35,667
Contingent rents	5,535		5,412		5,762		6,031		5,535		5,412
Total rental expense	$	38,937	$	41,079	$	44,088	$	36,780	$	38,937	$	41,079

Rental income:
Base rents	$	33,926	$	36,183	$	37,363	$	30,166	$	33,926	$	36,183
Contingent rents	4,608		4,389		3,871		5,305		4,608		4,389
Total rental income	$	38,534	$	40,572	$	41,234	$	35,471	$	38,534	$	40,572

F - 1718

Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:


	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Valuation Technique	Total			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Valuation Technique
										(In thousands)
Fair value measurements as of December 30, 2015:
Deferred compensation plan investments ⁽¹⁾										$	10,159		$	10,159	$	—		$	—	market approach
Interest rate swaps ⁽²⁾										(1,660		)	—		(1,660		)	—		income approach
Total										$	8,499		$	10,159	$	(1,660	)	$	—
	(In thousands)
Fair value measurements as of December 31, 2014:
Deferred compensation plan investments (1)	$	9,295	$	9,295	$	—	$	—	market approach	$	9,295		$	9,295	$	—		$	—	market approach
Interest rate swaps (2)	642		—		642		—		income approach	$	642		$	—	$	642		$	—	income approach
Interest rate caps (2)	$	0	$	—	$	0	$	—	income approach	$	0		$	—	$	0		$	—	income approach
Total	$	9,937	$	9,295	$	642	$	—		$	9,937		$	9,295	$	642		$	—

Fair value measurements as of December 25, 2013:
Deferred compensation plan investments (1)	$	8,168	$	8,168	$	—	$	—	market approach
Interest rate swaps (2)	$	3,032	$	—	$	3,032	$	—	income approach
Interest rate caps (2)	$	11	$	—	$	11	$	—	income approach
Total	$	11,211	$	8,168	$	3,043	$	—


(1)	The fair values of our deferred compensation plan investments are based on the closing market prices of the ~~participants’~~ elected investments.


(2)	The fair values of our interest rate swaps and interest rate caps are based upon Level 2 inputs, which include valuation models as reported by our counterparties. The key inputs for the valuation models are quoted market prices, interest rates and forward yield curves. See Note 10 for details on the interest rate swaps and interest rate ~~caps.~~cap.

See Note 11 for the disclosures related to the fair value of our pension plan assets.

Those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:


	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Impairment Charges		Valuation Technique	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Impairment Charges		Valuation Technique

Fair value measurements as of December 30, 2015:
Assets held for sale⁽¹⁾						$	931	$	—	$	264	market approach

Fair value measurements as of December 31, 2014:
Assets held and used (1)	$	—	$	320	income approach

Fair value measurements as of December 25, 2013:
Assets held and used ~~(1)~~(2)	$	1,198	$	4,795	income approach	$	—	$	—	$	320	income approach


(1)	As of ~~both~~December 30, 2015, assets held for sale were written down to their fair value. The fair value of assets held for sale is based upon Level 2 inputs, which include sales agreements.

(2)

As of December 31, 2014, ~~and December 25, 2013,~~ impaired assets related to an underperforming restaurant were written down to their fair value. To determine fair value, we used the income approach, which assumes that the future cash flows reflect current market expectations. These fair value measurements require significant judgment using Level 3 inputs, such as discounted cash flows from operations, which are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly.

F - 1819

Note 10. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Revolving loans due March 30, 2020					$	195,000	$	—
Revolving loans due April 24, 2018	$	85,250	$	95,250	—		85,250
Term loans due April 24, 2018	54,750		57,750		—		54,750
Capital lease obligations	18,813		20,073		20,745		18,813
Total long-term debt	158,813		173,073		215,745		158,813
Less current maturities	7,734		7,150		3,246		7,734
Noncurrent portion of long-term debt	$	151,079	$	165,923	$	212,499	$	151,079

~~Aggregate annual~~There are no future maturities of long-term debt ~~excluding capital lease obligations (see Note 8), at~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~due in 2016 through 2019. The $195.0 million of revolving loans are ~~as follows:~~due in 2020.

Refinancing and Amending of Credit Facility

(In thousands)
2015 $ 4,125
2016 4,500
2017 5,625
2018 125,750
2019 —
Thereafter —
Total long-term debt, excluding capital lease obligations $ 140,000

On March 30, 2015, Denny's Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries ~~have~~refinanced our credit facility (the "Old Credit Facility") and entered into a ~~credit facility~~new five-year senior secured revolver (the “New Credit Facility”). On October 30, 2015, we amended the New Credit Facility (the "Amended New Credit Facility" or the "credit facility") to exercise the accordion feature that allowed us to increase the size of the revolver and to effect certain other changes. The Amended New Credit Facility is comprised of a ~~senior secured term loan in an original principal amount of $60 million and a $190~~$325 million senior secured revolver (with a $30 million letter of credit sublimit)~~. As of~~ ~~December 31, 2014, we had outstanding term loan borrowings under the credit facility of~~ ~~$54.8 million~~ and ~~outstanding letters of credit under the senior secured revolver of~~ ~~$25.7 million. There were~~ ~~$85.3 million~~ ~~of revolving loans outstanding at~~ ~~December 31, 2014. These balances resulted in availability of~~ ~~$79.0 million~~ ~~under the revolving facility. The weighted average interest rate under the term loan~~is available for working capital, capital expenditures and ~~on outstanding revolver loans was~~ ~~2.17%, as of both~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 25, 2013~~.

~~The revolving credit facility includes an accordion feature that would allow us to increase the size of the revolver to~~ ~~$240 million. A commitment fee of 0.35% is paid on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.~~other general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the credit facility bear a tiered interest ~~rate~~rate. A tiered commitment fee is paid on the unused portion of the credit facility. Both tiered rates are based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio and ~~was~~were initially set at an interest rate of LIBOR plus ~~200~~150 basis ~~points.~~points and a commitment fee of 0.20%. The maturity date for the credit facility is ~~April 24, 2018.~~March 30, 2020.

The ~~credit facility~~Amended New Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company and its material subsidiaries and is secured by ~~substantially all of the~~ assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the stock of the Company's subsidiaries. It includes negative covenants ~~and restrictions (including limitation on additional borrowings, acquisitions, loans to franchisees, capital expenditures, lease commitments, stock repurchases and dividend payments)~~ that are usual for facilities and transactions of this type. The ~~credit facility~~Amended New Credit Facility also includes certain financial covenants with respect to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ~~ratio~~ratio.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Amended New Credit Facility was used to fund a $50 million accelerated share repurchase agreement. See Note 15 for the disclosures related to share repurchases.

As a result of the debt refinancing and ~~maximum capital expenditures.~~subsequent amendment, we recorded $0.3 million of losses on early extinguishment of debt from the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the Old Credit Facility. These losses are included as a component of other nonoperating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

~~The term loan~~

As of December 30, 2015, we had outstanding revolver loans of $195.0 million and outstanding letters of credit under the ~~credit facility requires amortization~~senior secured revolver of ~~the original term loan balance~~$22.9 million. These balances resulted in availability of 5% per year in the first two years (April 2013 through April 2015), 7.5% in the subsequent two years (April 2015 through April 2017) and 10% in the fifth year (April 2017 through April 2018) with the balance due at maturity. We are required to make certain mandatory prepayments under certain circumstances and have the option to make certain prepayments$107.1 million under the credit facility. ~~The credit facility includes events~~Prior to considering the impact of ~~default (and related remedies, including acceleration~~our interest rate swap, described below, the weighted-average interest rate on outstanding revolver loans was 1.76% and ~~increased interest rates following an event~~2.17% as of ~~default) that are usual for facilities~~December 30, 2015 and ~~transactions of this type.~~

~~During the year ended~~ December 31, 2014, ~~we paid~~ ~~$3.0 million~~respectively. Taking into consideration the interest rate swap that became effective on March 31, 2015, the ~~term loan under the credit facility.~~weighted-average interest rate of outstanding revolver loans was 2.31% as of December 30, 2015.

~~F - 19~~

Interest Rate Hedges

We ~~have~~previously entered into interest rate hedges that ~~cap~~capped the LIBOR rate on borrowings under our credit facility. The 200 basis point LIBOR cap applied to $125 million of borrowings from April 14, 2013 through April 13, 2014 and ~~applies~~ to ~~$150~~$150 million of borrowings from April 14, 2014 through March 31, 2015.

F - 20

We also ~~have~~previously entered into an interest rate ~~swaps~~swap to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our floating rate debt from March 31, 2015 ~~through~~to March 29, 2018. During the first quarter ~~ended December 31, 2014,~~of 2015, we ~~determined that~~entered into an additional interest rate swap to hedge a portion of the ~~underlying~~ cash flows of our floating rate debt from March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2025. We designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of our exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to payments of LIBOR due on a related to$120 million notional debt obligation. In addition, during the ~~swap were no longer probable~~fourth quarter of ~~occurring over the term of the~~2015, we entered into an additional interest rate swap ~~due~~ to hedge a portion of the ~~probability~~cash flows of ~~paying the~~our floating rate debt ~~down below the notional amount. As a result, we terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $30 million.~~

from March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2026. We ~~continue to designate the remaining~~designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to payments of LIBOR due on a related ~~$120~~$50 million notional debt ~~obligation from March 31, 2015 through March 29, 2018.~~ obligation.

Based on the interest rate as determined by our consolidated leverage ratio in effect as of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, under the terms of the ~~swap,~~swaps, we will pay an average fixed rate of ~~3.13%~~2.63% on the $120 million notional amount from March 31, 2015 to March 29, 2018, pay an average fixed rate of 3.94% on both the $120 million and ~~receive payments~~$50 million notional amounts from ~~a counterparty based~~March 29, 2018 through March 31, 2025, pay an average fixed rate of 3.96% on the ~~30-day LIBOR rate.~~$50 million notional amount from April 1, 2025 through March 31, 2026. As of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, the fair value of the interest rate ~~swap~~swaps was ~~$0.6~~a liability of $1.7 million, which is recorded as a component of other noncurrent ~~assets~~liabilities and deferred credits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 15 for the amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the interest rate swap.

We believe that our estimated cash flows from operations for 2015, combined with our capacity for additional borrowings under our credit facility, will enable us to meet our anticipated cash requirements and fund capital expenditures over the next twelve months.

Note 11. Employee Benefit Plans

We maintain several defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans which cover a substantial number of employees. Benefits under our defined benefit plans are based upon each employee’s years of service and average salary. Our funding policy for these plans is based on the minimum amount required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ~~Our pension plan~~

The Advantica Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan") was closed to new qualifying participants as of December 31, 1999. Benefits ceased to accrue for ~~pension plan~~Pension Plan participants as of December 31, 2004. ~~We also maintain defined contribution plans.~~

~~On September 17,~~During 2014, our Board of Directors approved the termination of the ~~Advantica~~ Pension Plan as of December 31, ~~2014, effective upon confirmation of compliance with any requirements under the terms of our credit facility.~~2014. We currently expect that ~~termination~~the liquidation of ~~such plan~~the Pension Plan will be completed byduring the ~~end~~first half of ~~fiscal 2015 or early~~ 2016. ~~Settlement gain or loss, if any, resulting from the termination will be recognized at that time.~~ See ~~the "Contributions and Expected Future Benefit Payments" section~~ below for details on the expected impact of the ~~termination.~~termination and liquidation.

F - 2021

Defined Benefit Plans

The obligations and funded status for ~~our pension plan~~the Pension Plan and other defined benefit plans were as follows:


	Pension Plan						Other Defined Benefit Plans						Pension Plan						Other Defined Benefit Plans
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	64,391		$	73,926		$	2,716		$	2,837		$	74,208		$	64,391		$	2,713		$	2,716
Service cost	380			400			—			—			380			380			—			—
Interest cost	3,099			2,977			123			111			2,983			3,099			107			123
Actuarial losses (gains)	12,313			(7,836		)	298			(37		)
Actuarial (gains) losses													(5,780		)	12,313			43			298
Benefits paid	(5,975		)	(5,076		)	(195		)	(195		)	(4,056		)	(5,975		)	(194		)	(195		)
Settlements	—			—			(229		)	—			—			—			—			(229		)
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	74,208		$	64,391		$	2,713		$	2,716		$	67,735		$	74,208		$	2,669		$	2,713
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	74,208		$	64,391		$	2,713		$	2,716		$	67,735		$	74,208		$	2,669		$	2,713

Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	61,094		$	58,006		$	—		$	—		$	62,820		$	61,094		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets	5,201			5,364			—			—			(386		)	5,201			—			—
Employer contributions	2,500			2,800			424			195			—			2,500			194			424
Benefits paid	(5,975		)	(5,076		)	(195		)	(195		)	(4,056		)	(5,975		)	(194		)	(195		)
Settlements	—			—			(229		)	—			—			—			—			(229		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	62,820		$	61,094		$	—		$	—		$	58,378		$	62,820		$	—		$	—
Funded status	$	(11,388	)	$	(3,297	)	$	(2,713	)	$	(2,716	)	$	(9,357	)	$	(11,388	)	$	(2,669	)	$	(2,713	)

The amounts recognized in ~~the~~our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:


	Pension Plan						Other Defined Benefit Plans						Pension Plan						Other Defined Benefit Plans
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Other current liabilities	$	—		$	—		$	(224	)	$	(451	)	$	(9,357	)	$	—		$	(291	)	$	(224	)
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	(11,388		)	(3,297		)	(2,489		)	(2,265		)	—			(11,388		)	(2,378		)	(2,489		)
Net amount recognized	$	(11,388	)	$	(3,297	)	$	(2,713	)	$	(2,716	)	$	(9,357	)	$	(11,388	)	$	(2,669	)	$	(2,713	)

The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, that have not yet been recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost, were as follows:

Pension Plan Other Defined Benefit Plans
December 31, 2014 December 25, 2013 December 31, 2014 December 25, 2013
(In thousands)
Unamortized actuarial losses, net $ (27,574 ) (17,433 ) (1,081 ) (899 )



	Pension Plan					Other Defined Benefit Plans
	December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Unamortized actuarial losses, net	$	(23,955	)	(27,574	)	(1,045	)	(1,081	)

~~Before considering~~When the ~~potential termination~~Pension Plan is liquidated during the first half of ~~our qualified pension plan,~~fiscal 2016, we will recognize the $24.0 million in unamortized actuarial losses that are currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. In addition during fiscal ~~2015~~, ~~$1.7 million~~ ~~and~~2016, less than $0.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized related to ~~the pension plan and~~our other defined benefit ~~plans, respectively.~~plans.

F - 2122

The components of the change in unamortized actuarial losses, net, included in accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Pension Plan:
Balance, beginning of year	$	(17,433	)	$	(27,798	)	$	(27,574	)	$	(17,433	)
Benefit obligation actuarial (loss) gain	(12,313		)	7,836
Net gain	1,248			876
Benefit obligation actuarial gain (loss)							5,780			(12,313		)
Net (loss) gain							(3,894		)	1,248
Amortization of net loss	924			1,653			1,733			924
Balance, end of year	$	(27,574	)	$	(17,433	)	$	(23,955	)	$	(27,574	)

Other Defined Benefit Plans:
Balance, beginning of year	$	(899	)	$	(1,007	)	$	(1,081	)	$	(899	)
Benefit obligation actuarial (loss) gain	(298		)	37
Benefit obligation actuarial loss							(43		)	(298		)
Amortization of net loss	66			71			79			66
Settlement loss recognized	50			—			—			50
Balance, end of year	$	(1,081	)	$	(899	)	$	(1,045	)	$	(1,081	)

Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 were a reduction of $2.2 million, an addition of ~~$6.3~~$6.3 million, and a reduction of ~~$6.3~~$6.3 million, ~~and an addition of~~ ~~$0.2 million~~, respectively.

Total minimum pension liability adjustments of $22.8 million (net of a tax benefit of $2.2 million) and $25.0 million (net of a tax benefit of ~~$3.7 million) and $18.7 million (including tax expense of~~ ~~$0.4 million~~)$3.7 million) are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net in our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, respectively.

The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Pension Plan:
Service cost	$	380		$	400		$	380		$	380		$	380		$	400
Interest cost	3,099			2,977			3,200			2,983			3,099			2,977
Expected return on plan assets	(3,953		)	(4,488		)	(4,057		)	(3,508		)	(3,953		)	(4,488		)
Amortization of net loss	924			1,653			1,763			1,733			924			1,653
Net periodic benefit cost	$	450		$	542		$	1,286		$	1,588		$	450		$	542
Other comprehensive loss (income)	$	10,141		$	(10,364	)	$	202
Other comprehensive (income) loss										$	(3,619	)	$	10,141		$	(10,364	)

Other Defined Benefit Plans:
Interest cost	$	123		$	111		$	116		$	107		$	123		$	111
Amortization of net loss	66			71			52			79			66			71
Settlement loss recognized	50			—			—			—			50			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	239		$	182		$	168		$	186		$	239		$	182
Other comprehensive loss (income)	$	182		$	(109	)	$	175
Other comprehensive (income) loss										$	(36	)	$	182		$	(109	)

Net pension and other defined benefit plan costs (including premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 were ~~$0.7~~$1.8 million,, $0.7 million and $~~1.5~~0.7 million, respectively.

F - 2223

Assumptions

Because ~~our pension plan~~the Pension Plan was closed to new qualifying participants as of December 31, 1999 and benefits ceased to accrue for Pension Plan participants as of December 31, 2004, an assumed rate of increase in compensation levels was not applicable for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 or ~~2012~~2013.


	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:
Pension Plan:
Discount rate							1.34	%	4.12	%
Other Defined Benefit Plans:
Discount rate	4.12	%	4.98	%			3.62	%	4.12	%

Assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:
Discount rate	4.98	%	4.18	%	4.59	%	4.12	%	4.98	%	4.18	%
Rate of increase in compensation levels	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Expected long-term rate of return on assets	6.50	%	7.75	%	7.75	%	5.75	%	6.50	%	7.75	%

In determining the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we evaluated our asset class return expectations, as well as long-term historical asset class returns. Projected returns are based on broad equity and bond indices. Additionally, we considered our historical compounded returns, which have been in excess of our forward-looking return expectations. In determining the discount rate, we have considered long-term bond indices of bonds having similar timing and amounts of cash flows as our estimated defined benefit payments. We use a yield curve based on high quality, long-term corporate bonds to calculate the single equivalent discount rate that results in the same present value as the sum of each of the plan's estimated benefit payments discounted at their respective spot rates.

For purposes of determining the benefit obligation for the Pension Plan as of December 30, 2015, and as a result of the pending liquidation of the plan, we have assumed that 70% of the population of active and vested deferred participants and 50% of retirees will elect a lump sum upon liquidation. The lump sum amounts have been calculated using 2016 Pension Protection Act lump sum mortality and the actual lump sum segment rates in effect for 2016. The remaining participants are assumed to have an annuity purchased on their behalf at prevailing market rates.

Plan Assets

The investment policy of ~~our pension plan~~the Pension Plan is based on an evaluation of our ability and willingness to assume investment risk in light of the financial and benefit-related goals objectives deemed to be prudent by the fiduciaries of our pension plan assets. These objectives include, but are not limited to, earning a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligation, managing funded status volatility and maintaining sufficient liquidity. AsDue to the expected liquidation of the Pension Plan during 2016, as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, the strategic target asset allocation is ~~75%~~100% fixed income securities (diversified between corporate and government holdings and generally long duration) ~~and~~ ~~25%~~ ~~equity securities (diversified between domestic and international holdings)~~.

We review the strategic asset allocation periodically to determine the appropriate balance between cost and risk, taking into account the regulatory funding requirements and the nature of our pension plan's liabilities. We monitor the competitive performance versus market benchmarks and rebalance to target allocations if necessary on a quarterly basis.

F - 2324

The fair values of ~~our pension plan~~the Pension Plan assets were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2014
Asset Category Total
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities
(Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

(In thousands)
Cash equivalents $ 1,812
$ 1,812
$ —
$ —
Equity securities:
U.S. large-cap (a) 7,154
7,154
—
—
U.S. mid-cap (b) 2,182
2,182
—
—
U.S. small-cap (c) 506
506
—
—
International large-cap 4,185
4,185
—
—
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Treasuries 5,202
5,202
—
—
Corporate bonds (d) 40,226
40,226
—
—
Other types of investments:
Commingled funds (e) 1,553
—
1,553
—
Total $ 62,820
$ 61,267
$ 1,553
$ —



	Fair Value Measurements as of December 30, 2015
Asset Category	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	1,777	$	1,777	$	—	$	—
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Treasuries	3,500		3,500		—		—
Corporate bonds (a)	53,101		53,101		—		—
Total	$	58,378	$	58,378	$	—	$	—


(a)	The majority of this category represents a fund with the objective of approximating the return of the S&P 500 Index. The remaining securities include both a large-value fund and a large-growth fund investing in diverse industries.


~~(b)~~	~~This category includes both a mid-growth fund with the objective of outperforming the Russell Mid Cap Growth Index and a mid-value fund investing in diverse industries.~~


~~(c)~~	~~This category includes both a small-value fund and a small-growth fund investing in diverse industries.~~


~~(d)~~	This category includes intermediate and long-term investment grade bonds from diverse industries.


~~(e)~~	~~This category represents a fund of well diversified mutual funds with the objective of providing a low-volatility means to access equity-like returns.~~

~~F - 24~~


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 25, 2013								Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2014
Asset Category	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Cash equivalents	$	1,785	$	1,785	$	—	$	—	$	1,812	$	1,812	$	—	$	—
Equity securities:
U.S. large-cap (a)	9,880		9,880		—		—		7,154		7,154		—		—
U.S. mid-cap (b)	2,467		2,467		—		—		2,182		2,182		—		—
U.S. small-cap (c)	615		615		—		—		506		506		—		—
International large-cap	6,200		6,200		—		—		4,185		4,185		—		—
Fixed income securities:
U.S. Treasuries	4,245		4,245		—		—		5,202		5,202		—		—
Corporate bonds (d)	33,310		33,310		—		—		40,226		40,226		—		—
Other types of investments:
Commingled funds (e)	2,592		—		2,592		—		1,553		—		1,553		—
Total	$	61,094	$	58,502	$	2,592	$	—	$	62,820	$	61,267	$	1,553	$	—


(a)	The majority of this category represents a fund with the objective of approximating the return of the S&P 500 Index. The remaining securities include both a large-value fund and a large-growth fund investing in diverse industries.


(b)	This category includes both a mid-growth fund with the objective of outperforming the Russell Mid Cap Growth Index and a mid-value fund investing in diverse industries.


(c)	This category includes both a small-value fund and a small-growth fund investing in diverse industries.


(d)	This category includes intermediate and long-term investment grade bonds from diverse industries.


(e)	This category represents a fund of well diversified mutual funds with the objective of providing a low-volatility means to access equity-like returns.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value.

Equity Securities and Fixed Income Securities: Valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) of shares held by the ~~pension plan~~Pension Plan at year-end. The NAV is a quoted price in an active market.

Cash Equivalents and Commingled Funds: Valuation determined by the trustee of the money market funds and commingled funds based on the fair value of the underlying securities within the fund, which represent the NAV, a practical expedient to fair value, of the units held by the ~~pension plan~~Pension Plan at year-end.

F - 25

Contributions and Expected Future Benefit Payments

We made no contributions to the Pension Plan during the year ended December 30, 2015 and made contributions of ~~$2.5~~$2.5 million ~~and $2.8 million to our qualified pension plan~~ during the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2014 ~~and~~ ~~December 25, 2013, respectively.~~. We made contributions of $~~0.4~~0.2 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million to our other defined benefit plans during the years ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, respectively. During ~~fiscal 2015 or early~~the first half of 2016, we will be required to make contributions to the ~~Advantica~~ Pension Plan as a result of the termination and planned ~~termination.~~liquidation. We currently estimate that these contributions will be ~~between $6 million and $8~~approximately $9.4 million. This estimate is based on expected interest rates, returns on plan assets and participant elections. We expect to contribute $~~0.2~~0.3 million to our other defined benefit plans during ~~2015. Before considering~~2016.

Taking into consideration the ~~potential~~ termination and planned liquidation of ~~our qualified pension plan,~~the Pension Plan, benefits expected to be paid for each of the next five years and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years from ~~2020~~2021 through ~~2024~~2025 are as follows:

~~F - 25~~


	Pension Plan		Other Defined Benefit Plans		Pension Plan		Other Defined Benefit Plans
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
2015	$	3,608	$	224
2016	3,530		280		$	67,735	$	291
2017	3,480		232		—		241
2018	3,529		236		—		244
2019	3,627		420		—		430
2020 through 2024	20,548		1,169
2020					—		230
2021 through 2025					—		1,097

Defined Contribution Plans

Eligible employees can elect to contribute up to 25% of their compensation to our 401(k) plan. As a result of certain IRS limitations, participation in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan is offered to certain employees. Under this deferred compensation plan, participants are allowed to defer up to 50% of their annual salary and up to 100% of their incentive compensation. Under both plans, we make matching contributions of up to 3% of compensation. Participants in the deferred compensation plan are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan; however, due to the above referenced IRS limitations, they are not eligible to receive the matching contributions under the 401(k) plan. Under these plans, we made contributions of $~~1.4~~1.6 million, $1.4 million and $~~1.3~~1.4 million for ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, respectively.

Note 12. Share-Based Compensation

Share-Based Compensation Plans

We maintain three share-based compensation plans under which stock options and other awards granted to our employees and directors are outstanding. Currently, the Denny's Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2012 Omnibus Plan") is used to grant share-based compensation to selected employees, officers and directors of Denny’s and its affiliates. However, we reserve the right to pay discretionary bonuses, or other types of compensation, outside of this plan. At December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, there were ~~3.0~~2.5 million shares available for grant under the 2012 Omnibus Plan. In addition, we have 0.8 million shares available to be issued outside of the 2012 Omnibus Plan pursuant to the grant or exercise of employment inducement awards of stock options and restricted stock units in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Total share-based compensation expense included as a component of net income was as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Stock options	$	52	$	558	$	909	$	—	$	52	$	558
Performance share awards	5,009		3,488		2,050		5,821		5,009		3,488
Restricted stock units for board members	785		806		537		814		785		806
Total share-based compensation	$	5,846	$	4,852	$	3,496	$	6,635	$	5,846	$	4,852

F - 26

The income tax benefits recognized as a component of the provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Income related to share-based compensation expense were approximately $2.6 million, $2.3 million and $1.9 million during the years ended December 30, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 25, 2013, respectively.

Stock Options

Options granted to date generally vest evenly over 3 years, have a 10-year contractual life and are issued at the market value at the date of grant.

~~F - 26~~

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015:


	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)		(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Outstanding, beginning of year	2,191		$	3.28				1,538		$	3.26
Exercised	(653	)	$	3.32				(200	)	$	3.66
Outstanding, end of year	1,538		$	3.26	4.28	$	10,841	1,338		$	3.20	3.44	$	9,081
Exercisable, end of year	1,538		$	3.26	4.28	$	10,841	1,338		$	3.20	3.44	$	9,081

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the market price of our stock on December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options that have an exercise price that is less than the market price of our stock. The aggregate intrinsic value of the options exercised was $~~3.0~~1.4 million, $~~2.6~~3.0 million and $~~1.7~~2.6 million during the years ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014 and December ~~26, 2012~~25, 2013, respectively.

There were no options granted during the years ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014 and December ~~26, 2012~~25, 2013. As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards outstanding.

Restricted Stock Units

We primarily grant restricted stock units containing a market condition based on the total shareholder return of our stock compared with the returns of a group of peer companies. The number of shares that are ultimately ~~released~~issued is dependent upon the level of obtainment of the market condition. The following table summarizes ~~information about~~the restricted stock units ~~activity:~~ activity during the year ended December 30, 2015:


	Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014				December 25, 2013				December 26, 2012
	Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Units		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)												(In thousands)
Outstanding, beginning of year	832		$	6.55	933		$	4.30	1,276		$	3.19	845		$	7.20
Granted	285		$	7.51	331		$	8.05	397		$	6.05	514		$	11.43
Released	(182	)	$	4.74	(430	)	$	2.83	(445	)	$	3.28
Converted													(297	)	$	6.05
Forfeited	(90	)	$	7.22	(2	)	$	4.63	(295	)	$	3.37	(34	)	$	9.95
Outstanding, end of year	845		$	7.20	832		$	6.55	933		$	4.30	1,028		$	9.55
Nonvested, end of year	548		$	7.82	661		$	7.05	804		$	4.56
Convertible, end of year													297		$	8.05

The weighted average grant date fair value of awards granted was $11.43, $7.51 and $8.05 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We made payments of $3.4 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million in cash during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and issued shares ~~released~~of 0.4 million, 0.1 million and 0.3 million, respectively, related to converted restricted stock units. The intrinsic value of shares converted was $4.9 million, $1.4 million and $2.7 million, during ~~the years ended~~ ~~December 31,~~2015, 2014, ~~December 25,~~ and 2013, ~~and~~ ~~December 26, 2012~~, ~~were$1.4 million~~, ~~$2.7 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$1.4 million~~, respectively.

F - 27

In February ~~2014,~~2015, we granted certain employees approximately 0.2 ~~million~~ ~~performance shares and related performance-based target cash awards of~~ ~~$2.2 million~~ ~~to certain employees. In April 2014, we granted less than 0.1~~ million performance shares that vest based on the total shareholder return ("TSR") of our stock compared to the TSRs of a group of peer companies and ~~related performance-based target cash awards of $0.3~~0.3 million ~~to additional employees~~performance shares that vest based on our Adjusted EBITDA growth rate, as defined under the ~~same award plan.~~terms of the award. As ~~these awards~~the TSR based performance shares contain a market condition, a Monte Carlo valuation was used to determine the ~~performance shares'~~ grant date fair value of ~~$7.65~~$11.86 per share. The performance shares based on the Adjusted EBITDA growth rate have a grant date fair value of $11.03 per share, ~~(February 2014) and $6.80 per share (April 2014) and~~ the ~~payout probabilities~~market value of our stock on the ~~target cash awards.~~date of grant. The awards granted to our named executive officers also contain a performance condition based on certain operating measures for the fiscal year ended December ~~31, 2014~~.30, 2015. The TSR and Adjusted EBITDA growth rate performance period is the three year fiscal period beginning ~~December 26, 2013~~January 1, 2015 and ending December ~~28, 2016.~~27, 2017. The performance shares ~~and cash awards~~ will vest and be earned (from 0% to ~~200%~~150% of the target award for each such increment) at the end of the performance ~~period based on the total shareholder return of our stock compared with the total shareholder returns of a group of peer companies.~~

D~~uring the years ended~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~, ~~December 25, 2013~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 26, 2012, we made payments of~~ ~~$1.1 million~~, ~~$1.2 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$1.0 million~~ ~~in cash, respectively and issued shares of~~ ~~0.1 million~~, ~~0.3 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~0.2 million, respectively related to restricted stock units.~~period.

As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013~~31, 2014, we had accrued compensation of ~~$2.5~~$2.6 million and ~~$0.7~~$2.5 million, respectively, included as a component of other current liabilities and $~~2.5~~2.2 million and $~~1.9~~2.5 million, respectively, included as a component of other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (based on the fair value of the related shares for the liability classified units as of the respective balance sheet dates). As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, we had $~~4.6~~6.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock unit awards granted, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 1.7 years.

Board Deferred Stock Units

During the year ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, we granted 0.1 million deferred stock units (which are equity classified) with a weighted average grant date fair value of $~~6.57~~10.60 per unit to non-employee members of our Board of Directors. A director may elect to convert these awards into shares of our common stock either on a specific date in the future (while still serving as a member of ~~the~~our Board of Directors) or upon termination as a member of ~~the~~our Board of Directors. During the year ended December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, ~~less than~~approximately 0.1 million deferred stock units with an intrinsic value of $1.4 million were converted into shares of our common stock. As of both December 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 there were 0.9 million deferred stock units outstanding. As of December 30, 2015, we had approximately $~~0.2~~0.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested deferred stock unit awards outstanding, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average of 0.3 years ~~years.~~.

Note 13. Income Taxes

The provisions for income taxes were as follows:


	Fiscal Year Ended									Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013			December 26, 2012			December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	377		$	428		$	875		$	1,622		$	377		$	428
State and local	1,818			1,548			382			1,382			1,818			1,548
Foreign	896			872			766			873			896			872
Deferred:
Federal	13,269			9,285			9,683			12,264			13,269			9,285
State and local	(54		)	(185		)	1,740			1,742			(54		)	(185		)
Release of valuation allowance	(270		)	(420		)	(661		)	(130		)	(270		)	(420		)
Total provision for income taxes	$	16,036		$	11,528		$	12,785		$	17,753		$	16,036		$	11,528

F - 28

The reconciliation of income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to our effective tax rate was as follows:

December 31, 2014 December 25, 2013 December 26, 2012
Statutory provision rate 35 % 35 % 35 %
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 3
5
4
Foreign taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 1
1
1
Wage addback on income tax credits earned 2
3
2
General business credits generated (6 ) (10 ) (7 )
Other (1 ) (1 ) 3
Release of valuation allowance (1 ) (1 ) (2 )
Effective tax rate 33 % 32 %
36 %

During 2014, we recorded a benefit of $0.3 million related to changes in the valuation allowance. For the 2014 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was primarily due to state and foreign taxes, the generation of employment tax credits and two discrete tax items. State job tax credits of $0.7 million were claimed during 2014 for current year’s hiring activity. State job tax credits of $0.5 million were also claimed during the 2014 period resulting from the prior year's hiring activity. In addition, share-based compensation adjustments resulted in an out-of-period tax benefit of $0.5 million. We do not believe the out-of-period adjustment was material to any prior or current year financial statements or on earnings trends.

~~During 2013, we recorded a benefit of~~ ~~$0.4 million~~ related to changes in the valuation allowance. For the 2013 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was due to state and foreign taxes, employment tax credits and discrete tax items. The passage of the American Tax Payer Relief Act of 2012 resulted in deferred tax benefits of $0.3 million related to work opportunity credits generated in 2012, which were allowed retroactively. In addition, state job tax credits of $0.8 million were claimed during the 2013 period resulting from the prior year's hiring activity. A valuation allowance of $0.2 million was recorded against certain state jobs tax credits during the 2013 period related to changes in California law enacted during the period.

~~During 2012, we recorded a benefit of~~ ~~$0.7 million~~ related to changes in the valuation allowance. For the 2012 period, the difference in the overall effective rate from the U.S. statutory rate was due to state and foreign taxes and discrete tax items, including a ~~$1.7 million~~ out-of-period adjustment related to the reversal of a portion of the income tax benefit recorded in fourth quarter of 2011. This out-of-period adjustment was not material to any prior or current year financial statements or on earnings trends. In addition, a ~~$1.6 million~~ ~~tax benefit was recorded in 2012 relating to additional state credits generated during 2012 from prior years' activity.~~



	December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
Statutory provision rate	35	%	35	%	35	%
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit	5		3		5
Foreign taxes, net of federal income tax benefit	—		1		1
Wage addback on income tax credits earned	2		2		3
General business credits generated	(7	)	(6	)	(10	)
Other	(2	)	(1	)	(1	)
Release of valuation allowance	—		(1	)	(1	)
Effective tax rate	33	%	33	%	32	%

The following table represents the approximate tax effect of each significant type of temporary difference that resulted in deferred income tax assets or liabilities.



	December 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Self-insurance accruals	$	8,371		$	9,063
Capitalized leases	2,083			2,103
Accrued exit cost	935			1,031
Fixed assets	1,638			5,426
Interest rate swaps	647			—
Pension, other retirement and compensation plans	11,570			16,527
Other accruals	395			2,526
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards	5,344			7,811
General business credit carryforwards - state and federal	20,691			22,089
Net operating loss carryforwards - state	12,172			12,368
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance	63,846			78,944
Less: valuation allowance	(12,395		)	(12,481		)
Total deferred tax assets	51,451			66,463
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets	(22,190		)	(22,474		)
Deferred finance costs	(102		)	(177		)
Interest rate swaps	—			(250		)
Total deferred tax liabilities	(22,292		)	(22,901		)
Net deferred tax asset	$	29,159		$	43,562

Net deferred tax assets are classified as follows:
Current	$	—		$	24,310
Noncurrent	29,159			19,252
Total	$	29,159		$	43,562

During the quarter ended December 30, 2015, we early adopted ASU 2015-17 in order to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes. This guidance requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent. We chose to prospectively apply the guidance, therefore, as a result of our early adoption, all deferred taxes are reported as noncurrent in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 30, 2015. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

F - 29

December 31, 2014 December 25, 2013
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Self-insurance accruals $ 9,063
$ 9,457
Capitalized leases 2,103
2,365
Accrued exit cost 1,031
1,485
Fixed assets 5,426
10,430
Pension, other retirement and compensation plans 16,527
11,237
Other accruals 2,526
885
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards 7,811
10,344
General business credit carryforwards - state and federal 22,089
29,490
Net operating loss carryforwards - state 12,368
12,976
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 78,944
88,669
Less: valuation allowance (12,481 ) (12,751 )
Total deferred tax assets 66,463
75,918
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets (22,474 ) (22,950 )
Deferred finance costs (177 ) (230 )
Interest rate swap (250 ) (1,184 )
Total deferred tax liabilities (22,901 ) (24,364 )
Net deferred tax asset $ 43,562
$ 51,554

Net deferred tax assets are classified as follows:
Current $ 24,310
$ 23,264
Noncurrent 19,252
28,290
Total $ 43,562
$ 51,554

At December ~~31, 2014~~,30, 2015, we had available, on a consolidated basis, federal general business credit carryforwards of approximately ~~$24.7~~$23.1 million,, most of which expire between ~~2027~~2029 and ~~2034,~~2035, and alternative minimum tax ("AMT") credit carryforwards of approximately ~~$7.8~~$5.3 million, which never expire. We also had available AMT net operating loss ("AMT NOL") carryforwards of approximately ~~$28.0~~$5.8 million,, which expire in ~~2024 and~~ 2030. Approximately ~~$5.3~~$5.3 million of general business credit carryforwards are unrecognized in the schedule above and on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a result of the application of ASC Paragraph 718-740-25-10, which delays their recognition in paid-in capital until they reduce taxes payable.

It is more likely than not that we will be able to utilize our credit carryforwards prior to expiration. In addition, it is more likely than not we will be able to utilize all of our existing temporary differences and a portion of our state tax net operating losses and state tax credit carryforwards prior to their expiration.

Of the $12.4 million valuation allowance remaining, approximately $10.0 million represents South Carolina net operating loss carryforwards that will never be utilized. An additional $2.0 million of the valuation allowance, if released, will be credited directly to paid-in capital.

~~The South Carolina net operating loss carryforwards represent~~ ~~78%~~ ~~of the total state net operating loss carryforwards.~~

Prior to 2005, Denny’s had ownership changes within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. In general, Section 382 places annual limitations on the use of certain tax attributes, such as AMT NOL and tax credit carryforwards, in existence at the ownership change date. It is our position that any pre-2005 AMT NOL and tax credits can be utilized as of December ~~31, 2014~~.30, 2015. The occurrence of an additional ownership change could limit our ability to utilize our current income tax credits generated after 2004.

There were no unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain income tax positions as of December 30, 2015 and December 31, ~~2014~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 25, 2013~~.2014. We do not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to increase over the next twelve months. As of and for the years ended December 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, ~~and~~ ~~December 25, 2013~~, there were no related interest and penalties recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income.

~~F - 30~~

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdictions and various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before ~~2010.~~2011. We remain subject to examination for U.S. federal taxes for ~~2011-2014~~2012-2015 and in the following major state jurisdictions: California ~~(2010-2014)~~(2011-2015), Florida ~~(2011-2014)~~(2012-2015) and Texas ~~(2012-2014)~~(2012-2015).

Note 14. Net Income Per Share

The amounts used for the basic and diluted net income per share ~~calculation~~calculations are summarized below:


	Fiscal Year Ended							Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014			December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)							(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income	$	32,725	��	$	24,572	$	22,309	$	35,976	$	32,725	$	24,572

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	86,323			90,829		94,949		82,627		86,323		90,829
Effect of dilutive share-based compensation awards	2,032			2,074		1,805		2,102		2,032		2,074
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	88,355			92,903		96,754		84,729		88,355		92,903

Basic net income per share	$	0.38		$	0.27	$	0.23	$	0.44	$	0.38	$	0.27
Diluted net income per share	$	0.37		$	0.26	$	0.23	$	0.42	$	0.37	$	0.26

Anti-dilutive share-based compensation awards	218			331		748		—		218		331

F - 30

Note 15. Shareholders' Equity

Share Repurchases

Our credit facility permits the payment of cash dividends and the purchase of Denny’s stock subject to certain limitations. Over the past several years, our Board of Directors has approved share repurchase programs authorizing us to repurchase up to a set amount of shares or dollar amount of our ~~Common Stock.~~common stock. Under the programs, we may, from time to time, purchase shares in the open market (including pre-arranged stock trading plans in accordance with guidelines specified in Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of ~~1934)~~1934, as amended) or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to market and business conditions.

During 2015, 2013 and 2012, the Board approved share repurchase programs for $100 million of our common stock, 10.0 million shares of our common stock and 6.0 million shares of our common stock, respectively.

Taking into consideration the above-mentioned ASR agreement, during 2015, 2014 and 2013, we repurchased 8.5 million, 5.3 million and ~~6.0 million, respectively. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we repurchased 5.3 million,~~ 4.2 ~~million~~ ~~and~~ ~~4.8~~ million shares for a total of $92.7 million, $36.0 million ~~$24.7 million~~ and ~~$22.2~~$24.7 million, respectively, thus completing the 2012 and 2013 repurchase ~~program.~~programs. As of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015, there ~~are 3.9~~is $37.8 million ~~shares~~of our common stock remaining to be repurchased under the ~~2013~~2015 repurchase program.

Repurchased shares are included as treasury stock in ~~the~~our Consolidated Balance Sheets and ~~the~~our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity.

F - 31

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	Pensions			Derivatives			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Pensions			Derivatives			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Balance as of December 28, 2011	$	(24,813	)	$	—		$	(24,813	)
Benefit obligation actuarial loss	(4,802		)	—			(4,802		)
Net gain	2,610			—			2,610
Amortization of net loss	1,815			—			1,815
Income tax benefit	191			—			191
Balance as of December 26, 2012	$	(24,999	)	$	—		$	(24,999	)
Balance as of December 28, 2012										$	(24,999	)	$	—		$	(24,999	)
Benefit obligation actuarial gain	7,873			—			7,873			7,873			—			7,873
Net gain	876			—			876			876			—			876
Amortization of net loss	1,724			—			1,724
Amortization of net loss ⁽¹⁾										1,724			—			1,724
Net change in fair value of derivatives	—			3,032			3,032			—			3,032			3,032
Income tax expense	(4,164		)	(1,184		)	(5,348		)	(4,164		)	(1,184		)	(5,348		)
Balance as of December 25, 2013	$	(18,690	)	$	1,848		$	(16,842	)	$	(18,690	)	$	1,848		$	(16,842	)
Benefit obligation actuarial loss	(12,611		)	—			(12,611		)	(12,611		)	—			(12,611		)
Net gain	1,248			—			1,248			1,248			—			1,248
Amortization of net loss	990			—			990
Amortization of net loss ⁽¹⁾										990			—			990
Settlement loss recognized	50			—			50			50			—			50
Net change in fair value of derivatives	—			(2,389		)	(2,389		)	—			(2,389		)	(2,389		)
Income tax benefit	4,019			933			4,952			4,019			933			4,952
Balance as of December 31, 2014	$	(24,994	)	$	392		$	(24,602	)	$	(24,994	)	$	392		$	(24,602	)
Benefit obligation actuarial gain										5,737			—			5,737
Net loss										(3,894		)	—			(3,894		)
Amortization of net loss ⁽¹⁾										1,812			—			1,812
Net change in fair value of derivatives										—			(1,444		)	(1,444		)
Reclassification of derivatives to interest expense ⁽²⁾										—			(859		)	(859		)
Income tax (expense) benefit										(1,425		)	898			(527		)
Balance as of December 30, 2015										$	(22,764	)	$	(1,013	)	$	(23,777	)


(1)	Before-tax amount that was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and included as a component of pension expense within general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 11 for additional details.

(2)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income, represent payments made to the counterparty for the effective portions of the interest rate swaps. These amounts are included as a component of interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We expect to reclassify approximately $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our interest rate swaps during the next twelve months. See Note 10 for additional details.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, December 25, 2013 and December 26, 2012, before-tax amortization of net losses of $1.0 million, $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss and included as a component of pension expense within general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The tax effect of the reclassifications was expense of $0.4 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. See Note 11 for additional details.

Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies

We have guarantees related to certain franchisee leases and ~~loans.~~loans with terms extending from one to six years. Payments under these guarantees would result from the inability of a franchisee to fund required payments when due. Through December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, no events had occurred that caused us to make payments under the guarantees. There were ~~$9.8~~$8.7 million and ~~$6.1~~$9.8 million of loans outstanding under these programs as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, respectively. As of December ~~31, 2014,~~30, 2015, the maximum amounts payable under the lease guarantee and loan guarantees were $2.0 million and ~~$1.7~~$1.3 million, respectively. As a result of these guarantees, we have recorded liabilities of ~~approximately~~less than $0.1 million as of December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 and December ~~25, 2013,~~31, 2014, which are included as a component of other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Balance Sheets and other nonoperating expense in our ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Income.

F - 32

We have amounts payable under purchase contracts for food and non-food products. Many of these agreements do not obligate us to purchase any specific volumes and include provisions that would allow us to cancel such agreements with appropriate notice. Our future ~~commitments~~purchase obligation payments due by period for both company and franchised restaurants at December ~~31, 2014~~30, 2015 ~~under these contracts~~ consist of the following:


	Purchase Obligations		(In thousands)
	(In thousands)
Payments due by period:
Less than 1 year	$	185,045	$	185,185
1-2 years	20,577		38,255
3-4 years	—		—
5 years and thereafter	—		—
Total	$	205,622	$	223,440

For agreements with cancellation provisions, amounts included in the table above represent our estimate of purchase obligations during the periods presented if we were to cancel these contracts with appropriate notice. We would likely take delivery of goods under such circumstances.

Note 17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information


	Fiscal Year Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013		December 26, 2012		December 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 25, 2013
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Income taxes paid, net	$	3,802	$	2,777	$	2,034	$	5,364	$	3,802	$	2,777
Interest paid	$	8,170	$	9,336	$	12,918	$	8,141	$	8,170	$	9,336

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Notes received in connection with disposition of property	$	—	$	—	$	290
Property acquisition payable							$	573	$	—	$	—
Accrued purchase of property	$	635	$	1,575	$	1,570	$	1,781	$	635	$	1,575
Issuance of common stock, pursuant to share-based compensation plans	$	1,030	$	1,937	$	1,151	$	4,551	$	1,030	$	1,937
Execution of capital leases	$	3,300	$	5,663	$	2,643	$	5,556	$	3,300	$	5,663
Treasury stock payable	$	152	$	220	$	560	$	185	$	152	$	220

Note 18. ~~Related Party Transactions~~

In prior years, including 2012, we sold company restaurants to franchisees that are former employees, including former officers. There were no such sales during 2014 or 2013. We received cash proceeds of $0.5 million and recognized a loss of $0.2 million from these related party sales during 2012. In relation to these sales, we may enter into leases or subleases with the franchisees at normal market rates.

~~Note 19.~~ Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

The results for each quarter include all adjustments which, in our opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for interim periods. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

~~F - 33~~

Selected consolidated financial data for each quarter of fiscal ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 are set forth below:


	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014								Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2015
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter		First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)								(In thousands, except per share data)
Company restaurant sales	$	79,304	$	81,138	$	82,827	$	91,415	$	85,982	$	88,629	$	89,279	$	89,183
Franchise and licensing revenue	32,616		33,476		34,205		37,314		34,189		34,690		34,499		34,842
Total operating revenue	111,920		114,614		117,032		128,729		120,171		123,319		123,778		124,025
Total operating costs and expenses	100,648		99,669		102,323		112,324		104,854		105,905		108,055		109,328
Operating income	$	11,272	$	14,945	$	14,709	$	16,405	$	15,317	$	17,414	$	15,723	$	14,697
Net income	$	6,431	$	8,273	$	8,343	$	9,678	$	8,533	$	9,734	$	8,950	$	8,759
Basic net income per share (a)	$	0.07	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.11
Basic net income per share ⁽¹⁾									$	0.10	$	0.12	$	0.11	$	0.11
Diluted net income per share ~~(a)~~(1)	$	0.07	$	0.09	$	0.10	$	0.11	$	0.10	$	0.11	$	0.11	$	0.11


~~(a)~~(1)	Per share amounts do not necessarily sum to the total year amounts due to changes in shares outstanding and rounding.

F - 33



	Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Company restaurant sales	$	79,304	$	81,138	$	82,827	$	91,415
Franchise and licensing revenue	32,616		33,476		34,205		37,314
Total operating revenue	111,920		114,614		117,032		128,729
Total operating costs and expenses	100,648		99,669		102,323		112,324
Operating income	$	11,272	$	14,945	$	14,709	$	16,405
Net income	$	6,431	$	8,273	$	8,343	$	9,678
Basic net income per share ⁽¹⁾	$	0.07	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.11
Diluted net income per share ⁽¹⁾	$	0.07	$	0.09	$	0.10	$	0.11


(1)	Per share amounts do not necessarily sum to the total year amounts due to changes in shares outstanding and rounding.

Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2013
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
(In thousands, except per share data)
Company restaurant sales $ 81,030
$ 82,841
$ 83,371
$ 81,092
Franchise and licensing revenue 33,460
33,730
33,904
33,165
Total operating revenue 114,490
116,571
117,275
114,257
Total operating costs and expenses 101,039
103,957
103,750
106,326
Operating income $ 13,451
$ 12,614
$ 13,525
$ 7,931
Net income $ 7,081
$ 6,198
$ 7,031
$ 4,262
Basic net income per share (a) $ 0.08
$ 0.07
$ 0.08
$ 0.05
Diluted net income per share (a) $ 0.07
$ 0.07
$ 0.08
$ 0.05


~~(a)~~	~~Per share amounts do not necessarily sum to the total year amounts due to changes in shares outstanding and rounding.~~

~~The fluctuation in net income during the fourth quarter of 2013 relates primarily to the impairment of an underperforming restaurant.~~

Note ~~20.~~19. Subsequent Events

We performed an evaluation of subsequent events and determined that no events required disclosure.

F - 34

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: ~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016



	DENNY'S CORPORATION

BY:	/s/ F. Mark Wolfinger
	F. Mark Wolfinger
	Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Signature	Title	Date

/s/ John C. Miller	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(John C. Miller)	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ F. Mark Wolfinger	Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(F. Mark Wolfinger)	(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Jay C. Gilmore	Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Jay C. Gilmore)	(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Debra Smithart-Oglesby	Director and Chair of the Board of Directors	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Debra Smithart-Oglesby)

/s/ ~~Gregg.~~Gregg R. Dedrick	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Gregg R. Dedrick)

/s/ José M. Gutiérrez	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(José M. Gutiérrez)

/s/ George W. Haywood	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(George W. Haywood)

/s/ Brenda J. Lauderback	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Brenda J. Lauderback)

/s/ Robert E. Marks	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Robert E. Marks)

/s/ ~~Louis P. Neeb~~	~~Director~~	~~March 13, 2015~~
~~(Louis P. Neeb)~~

~~/s/~~ Donald C. Robinson	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Donald C. Robinson)

/s/ Laysha Ward	Director	~~March 13, 2015~~February 29, 2016
(Laysha Ward)



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs (2)	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (2)
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
September 25, 2014 – October 22, 2014	113	$	7.31	113	4,234
October 23, 2014 – November 19, 2014	175	8.76		175	4,059
November 20, 2014 – December 31, 2014	170	9.79		170	3,889
Total	458	$	8.79	458



	Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2013
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Company restaurant sales	$	81,030	$	82,841	$	83,371	$	81,092
Franchise and licensing revenue	33,460		33,730		33,904		33,165
Total operating revenue	114,490		116,571		117,275		114,257
Total operating costs and expenses	101,039		103,957		103,750		106,326
Operating income	$	13,451	$	12,614	$	13,525	$	7,931
Net income	$	7,081	$	6,198	$	7,031	$	4,262
Basic net income per share (a)	$	0.08	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.05
Diluted net income per share (a)	$	0.07	$	0.07	$	0.08	$	0.05