0000866368psb:SpecialCashDividendMember2021-01-012021-12-31

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

R

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

or

£

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-10709

PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California

95-4300881

Maryland

95-4300881

(State or other jurisdiction ofOther Jurisdiction

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)of Incorporation)

701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201-2349

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

818-244-8080

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Ticker Symbol

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

PSB

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1,000 of a Share of

5.750% Cumulative Preferred5.250% Cum Pref Stock, Series U,X, $0.01 par value per share

PSBPrX

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1,000 of a Share of

5.700% Cumulative Preferred5.200% Cum Pref Stock, Series V,Y, $0.01 par value per share

PSBPrY

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1,000 of a Share of

5.200% Cumulative Preferred4.875% Cum Pref Stock, Series W,Z, $0.01 par value per share

PSBPrZ

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1,000 of a Share of

5.250% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series X, $0.01 par value per share

New York Stock Exchange

Depositary Shares Each Representing 1/1,000 of a Share of

5.200% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Y, $0.01 par value per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes R No ☐ £

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes £ No ☑ R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§232.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

R

Accelerated filer

£

Non-accelerated filer

£

Smaller reporting company

£

Emerging growth company

£

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No ☑ R

As of June 30, 2017,2021, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,614,997,862$2,967,153,632 based on the closing price as reported on that date.

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of February 19, 201818, 2022 (the latest practicable date): 27,254,607.27,606,127.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive proxy statement to be filed in connection with the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be held in 20182022 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, are made throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “may,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to (a)to: (i) the duration and severity of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and its impact on our business and our customers; (ii) changes in general economic and business conditions; (b)conditions, including as a result of the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic; (iii) potential regulatory actions to close our facilities or limit our ability to evict delinquent customers; (iv) decreases in rental rates or increases in vacancy rates/failure to renew or replace expiring leases; (c)(v) tenant defaults; (d)(vi) the effect of the recent credit and financial market conditions; (e)(vii) our failure to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); (f)(viii) the economic health of our customers; (g)(ix) the health of our officers and directors; (x) increases in operating costs; (h)(xi) casualties to our properties not covered by insurance; (i)(xii) the availability and cost of capital; (j)(xiii) increases in interest rates and its effect on our stock price; (xiv) security breaches, including ransomware, or a failure of our networks, systems or technology which could adversely impact our operations or our business, customer and (k)employee relationships or result in fraudulent payments; (xv) the impact of inflation; and (xvi) other factors discussed under the heading Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

The Company

PS Business Parks, Inc. (“PSB”) is a fully-integrated, self-advised and self-managed REIT that owns, operates, acquires and develops commercial properties, primarily multi-tenant flex,industrial, industrial-flex and low-rise suburban office space. As of December 31, 2021, PSB owned and industrial space. operated 27.7 million rentable square feet of commercial space, comprising 97 business parks and 666 buildings located in California, Texas, Virginia, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. PSB’s properties are primarily located in major coastal markets that have experienced long-term economic growth. PSB also held a controlling interest in the following joint venture arrangements, both located in Tysons, Virginia: a 95.0% interest in Highgate at the Mile, a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex, and a 98.2% interest in Brentford at the Mile, a 411-unit multifamily apartment complex development. PSB manages 0.3 million rentable square feet on behalf of Public Storage (“PS”).

Substantially all of PSB’s assets are held, and its business is conducted, through PS Business Parks, L.P. (the “OP”), a California limited partnership. As of December 31, 2021, PSB owned 79.1% of the common partnership units of the OP. The remaining common partnership units are owned by PS. PSB, as the sole general partner of the OP, has full, exclusive and complete controlresponsibility and discretion in managing and controlling the OP. PS also owns 7.2 million shares of the OP as the sole general partner and, as of December 31, 2017, owned 78.9% of the common partnership units, with Public Storage (“PS”) owning the remainder. Assuming issuance of PSB common stock upon redemption of the common partnership units held by PS, PSand would own 41.9%41.4% (or 14.5 million shares) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock if it redeemed its common partnership units for common stock.

Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar references mean PS Business Parks, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including the OP.OP and our consolidated joint ventures.

As of December 31, 2017,  we owned and operated 28.0 million rentable square feet of commercial space, comprising 98 business parks, in California, Texas, Virginia, Florida, Maryland and Washington. The Company focuses on owning concentrated business parks which provide the Company with the greatest flexibility to meet the needs of its customers. Along with the commercial space, we also have a 95.0% interest in a  395-unit apartment complex.  The Company also manages 684,000 rentable square feet on behalf of PS.

History of the Company: Effective May19,2021, following approval by its common and preferred stockholders, PSB reincorporated from the state of California to the state of Maryland. The Company was originally formed in 1990 as a California corporation. Through a series of transactions between January 1997 toand March 1998, the Company was renamed “PS Business Parks, Inc.” and became a publicly held, fully integrated, self-advised and self-managed REIT having interests in commercial real estate held through our OP.


2


Table of Contents

Principal Business Activities

We are in thea commercial property business,landlord, with 9897 business parks consisting of multi-tenant flex, industrial, industrial-flex and low-rise suburban office space. We own 14.5The Company owns 19.3 million square feet of flexindustrial space that is primarily configured as warehouse space with ample dock access. We own 5.5 million square feet of industrial-flex space, representing industrial buildings that are configured with a combination of warehouse and low-rise suburban office space andthat can be designed to fit a wide variety of uses.use types. The warehouse component of the flexindustrial-flex space has a number of uses including light manufacturing and assembly, storage and warehousing, showroom, laboratory, distribution, and research and development activities. The office component of flexindustrial-flex space is complementary to the warehouse component by enabling businesses to accommodate management and production staff in the same facility. The Company owns 8.8 million square feet of industrial space that has characteristics similar to the warehouse component of the flex space as well as ample dock access. In addition, the Company owns 4.72.9 million square feet of low-rise suburban office space, generally either in business parks that combine office and flex spacebuildings with industrial and/or industrial-flex buildings or in submarkets where the market demand is more office focused.

2


Table of Contents

We generally seek to own and operate in multi-tenant buildings in multi-building business parks which accommodate various businesses and uses. Our business parks average 1014 buildings and 750,0000.8 million rentable square feet per park, located on parcels of various sizes, ranging from one1 to 49 buildings and 12,000 to 3.5 million square feet of rentable space. Parking at most of our parks is generally open but in some instances is covered. The ratio of parking spaces to rentable square feet generally ranges from two to six per thousand square feet depending upon the use of the property and its location. OfficeLow-rise suburban office space generally requires a greater parking ratio than most industrial uses.

The customer base for our facilities is diverse. The portfolio can be bifurcatedFor certain operational performance metrics, we bifurcate our facilities into those facilities that service small to medium-sized businesseswith average unit sizes over 5,000 square feet and those that service larger businesses. Approximately 36.1% of in-place rents from the portfolio are derived from facilities that generally serve small to medium-sized businesses. A property in this facility type is typically divided into unitswith average unit sizes under 5,000 square feet given that the nature of the customer base and leases generally range from one to three years. The remaining 63.9%use types differ between the two, which can result in varying performance. Approximately 33.5% of in-place rents from the portfolio are generallyas of December 31, 2021 were derived from facilities that serve larger businesses,customers at properties with unitsaverage unit sizes under 5,000 square feet and larger.feet. The remaining 66.5% of in-place rents came from customers at properties with average unit sizes over 5,000 square feet. The Company also has several customers that lease space in multiple buildings and locations. TheAs of December 31, 2021, the U.S. Government is the largest customer with multiple17 separate leases encompassing approximately 642,000465,000 square feet or 4.5%and 2.8% of the Company’s annualized rental income.

We operate in six states and we may expand our operations to other states or reduce the number of states in which we operate. However, we have no current plans to expand into additional markets or exit existing markets. Properties are acquired for both income and capital appreciation potential, capital appreciation; there isand we place no limitation on the amount that can be invested in any specific property.

The Company owns land which may be used for the future development of commercial properties including approximately 14.0 acres in Dallas, Texas and 6.4 acres in Northern Virginia.

See “Objectives and Strategies” below for further information.

Our principal executive offices are located at 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201-2349, and our telephone number is (818) 244-8080. We maintain aCopies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, including any amendments to the foregoing reports, are available, free of charge, through our corporate website withat www.psbusinessparks.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material to the address www.psbusinessparks.com.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The information contained on our website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Recent Company Developments

Acquisition of Real Estate Facilities: In On November 18, 2021, the third quarter of 2016, weCompany acquired twoa multi-tenant office buildings aggregating 226,000industrial business park comprising approximately 141,000 rentable square feet in Rockville, MarylandPlano, Texas, for a total purchase price of $13.3$25.6 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On September 1, 2021, the Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 718,000 rentable square feet in Grapevine, Texas, for a total purchase price of $123.3 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

Development of Real Estate Facilities: In certain instances, we may seek to redevelop our existing real estate or develop new buildings on excess land parcels.

During 2021, we completed the development of an 83,000 square foot shallow-bay industrial building on an excess land parcel at our Freeport Business Park located in Irving, Texas for total development costs of $8.1 million. The occupancy rateasset was placed into service on March 1, 2021 and accordingly was reflected under real estate facilities, at cost on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021.

3


As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 83,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our 212 Business Park located in Kent, Washington. As of December 31, 2021, $2.2 million of the estimated $15.4 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 17,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our Boca Commerce Park, located in Boca Raton, Florida. As of December 31, 2021, $1.1 million of the estimated $4.0 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Development of Multifamily Real Estate

The Mile is an office and multifamily park we own which sits on 44.5 contiguous acres of land located in Tysons, Virginia. The park consists of 628,000 square feet of office space and a 395-unit multifamily apartment community we developed, Highgate at The Mile, which we completed in 2017 through a joint venture with a local developer and multifamily operator (the “JV Partner”). In 2019, we successfully rezoned The Mile allowing us to develop, at our election, up to 3,000 additional multifamily units and approximately 500,000 square feet of other commercial uses.

In August 2020, the Company entered into a new joint venture with the JV Partner (the “Brentford Joint Venture”) for the purpose of developing a second multifamily property, Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex. Under the Brentford Joint Venture agreement, the Company has increased from 18.5% ona 98.2% controlling interest and is the datemanaging member with the JV Partner holding the remaining 1.8% limited partnership interest. We contributed a parcel of acquisitionland to 43.1%the Brentford Joint Venture (the “Brentford Parcel”) at a value of $18.5 million, for which we received equity contribution credit in the Brentford Joint Venture. Our cost basis in the Brentford Parcel was $5.1 million as of December 31, 2017.2021.

DevelopmentConstruction of Multi-Family Real Estate: In 2015, we demolished oneBrentford at The Mile commenced in August 2020 and is anticipated to be completed over a period of our existing office buildings located within our 628,000 square foot office park (known as “The Mile”) in Tysons, Virginia, and completed a 395-unit multi-family building (“Highgate”) in 2017, for24 to 36 months at an aggregate estimated development cost of $115.6$110 million (includingto $115 million, excluding land cost. As of December 31, 2021, the fair valuedevelopment cost incurred was $54.8 million, which is reflected in land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets along with our $5.1 million cost basis in the Brentford Parcel.

While multifamily real estate was not previously a core asset class for us, we determined that multifamily real estate represents a unique opportunity and the highest and best use of the land). We leveraged the expertise ofBrentford Parcel. Through joint ventures we have partnered with a well-regarded local developer and operator of multi-family real estate, who holdsmultifamily properties in order to leverage their development and operational expertise. The scope and timing of the future phases of development of The Mile are subject to a 5.0% interest in the joint venture that owns this development. We are also seeking entitlements to develop an additional multi-family complex on avariety of uncertainties, including site held by a 123,000 square foot vacantplan approvals and building we own located within The Mile. permits.

See “Objectives and Strategies” below for further information regarding our development and redevelopment activities.

DispositionsSale of Real Estate Facilities or Development Rights:

On March 31, 2017, weDecember 30, 2021, the Company sold development rights to build medical office buildings on land adjacent to our Westech Business Parka 53,000 square foot industrial building located in Silver Spring,Beltsville, Maryland, for $6.5million. We had acquired the development rights as part of its 2006 acquisition of the park. We received net sale proceeds of $6.4 million, of which $1.5 million was received in prior years and $4.9 million was received in 2017. We recorded a net gain of $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On May 1, 2017, we disposed of Empire Commerce, a two-building single-story office park comprising 44,000 square feet, located in Dallas, Texas, for net proceeds of $2.1$4.5 million, which resulted in a net gain on sale of $1.2$3.2 million.

We have certain office propertiesOn December 29, 2021, the Company sold a 70,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Orange County,Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $8.8 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $6.3 million.

On October 19, 2021, the Company sold a 371,000 square foot industrial-flex business park located in San Diego, California, for net sale proceeds of $311.1 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $301.3 million.

On September 17, 2021, the Company sold a 22,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $3.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $2.9 million.

On July 16, 2021, the Company sold a 244,000 square foot office business park located in Herndon, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $40.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $27.0 million.

On June 17, 2021, the Company sold a 198,000 square foot office-oriented flex business park located in Chantilly, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $32.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $19.2 million.

4


Table of Contents

During 2021, the Company reclassified the foregoing assets as properties held for sale. These facilities comprisedsale, net, in the consolidated balance sheet as of 705,000 square feet, and generated $8.4 million in net operating income (defined below) during the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

3


Table of Contents

Exit of non-strategic markets: During 2014 and 2015, we sold nine business parks with 2.4 million rentable square feet and 11.5 acres of land for $253.4 million, exiting non-strategic markets including Portland, Oregon, Phoenix, Arizona, and Sacramento, California. We have no plans to exit additional markets.

Tax and Corporate Structure

For all periods presented herein, we have elected REIT status under the Code. AsFor each taxable year in which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally dowill not incurbe subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax if we distribute substantially all ofon our “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid and excluding our net rents and gains from real property, dividends, and interest) each year, and if we meet certain organizational and operational rules. To the extent that we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the “REIT taxable income”capital gain) that is currently distributed to our shareholders.stockholders. We believe we have met these requirements in all periods presented herein, and we expect to continue to elect and qualify as a REIT.

PSB is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”), with substantially all of our activities conducted through the OP. We acquired interests in certain properties from PS during PSB’s initial formation in exchange for operating partnership units, which allowed PS to defer the recognition of a tax gain. We havegain on the ability to offer similar tax-efficient transactions to potential sellers of real estate in the future.contributed properties.

We are the sole general partner of the OP.OP, which has equity in the form of common partnership units and preferred partnership units. As of December 31, 2017,2021, we owned 78.9%79.1% of the common partnership units of the OP withand 100% of the preferred partnership units. The remainder of the common partnership units are owned by PS. The common units owned by PS may be redeemed, subject to certain limitations, for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis or, at our option, an equivalent value in cash. The Company owns various series of preferred units issued by the OP at terms and amounts substantially identical to the various series of our preferred stock outstanding.

The Company’s interest in the OP entitles it to share in cash distributions from, and the profits and losses of, the OP in proportion to the Company’s economic interest in the OP (apart from tax allocations of profits and losses to take into account pre-contribution property appreciation or depreciation). The Company, since 1998, has paid per share dividends on its common and preferred stock that track, on a one-for-one basis, the amount of per unit cash distributions the Company receives from the OP in respect of the common and preferred partnership units in the OP that are owned by the Company.

As the general partner of the OP, the Company has the exclusive responsibility under the Operating Partnership Agreement to manage and conduct the business of the OP. The OP is responsible for, and pays when due, its share of all administrative and operating expenses of the properties it owns.

Common Officers and Directors with PS

Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Chairman of the Company, is also the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of PS. Joseph D. Russell, Jr. is a director of the Company and also President and Chief Executive Officer of PS. Gary E. Pruitt,Kristy M. Pipes, an independent director of the Company, is also a trustee of PS.PS and Gary E. Pruitt, an independent director of the Company, was also a trustee of PS until he retired from the Board of Trustees of PS in January 2021. Other employees of PS render services to the Company pursuant to a cost sharing and administrative services agreement.

Common Services Provided to and by PS

We manage industrial, office, and retail facilities in the United States for PS under either the “Public Storage” or “PS Business Parks” names (the “PS Management Agreement”). Under PS’s supervision, we coordinate and assist in rental and marketing activities, property maintenance and other operational activities, including the selection of vendors, suppliers, employees, and independent contractors. Management fee revenue derived from the PS Management Agreement totaled $506,000,  $518,000 and $540,000$0.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015, respectively.2019. These amounts are included in “interest and other income” on our consolidated statements of income.

PS also provides property management services for the self-storage component of two assets owned by the Company. Management fee expenses under the contract were $92,000, $86,000 and $79,000$0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015, respectively.2019. These amounts are included under “cost of operations” on our consolidated statements of income.


5


Table of Contents

Pursuant to a cost sharing and administrative services agreement, we share certain administrative services, corporate office space, and certain other third party costs with PS which are allocated based upon time, effortfair and other methodologies.reasonable estimates of the cost of the services expected to be provided. We reimbursed PS $1.3$1.4 million $1.1 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2021, and $1.2 million respectively, infor each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162020, and 20152019 for costs paid on our behalf, andwhile PS reimbursed us $31,000 and $38,000less than $0.1 million for costs we incurred on their behalf for each of the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016, respectively.2019.

4Management


Table of Contents

Management

Maria R. Hawthorne leads the Company’s senior management team. Ms. Hawthorne isStephen W. Wilson, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), of the Company as well as interimand Maria R. Hawthorne, Interim Chief Financial Officer.Operating Officer (“COO”), are leading the Company’s senior management team while Dan M. Chandler, III, CEO is on a leave of absence. The Company’s senior management also includes: John W. Petersen,Adeel Khan, Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingFinancial Officer; Trenton A. Groves, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer; Ryan Rhoads, Vice President, Operations Finance; Jerread Wright, Vice President, Information Technology; Patricia H. Park, Vice President, Human Resources; Coby A. Holley, Vice President, Real Estate; Christopher M. Auth, Divisional Vice President (Washington Metro Division); Trenton A. Groves, Vice President and Corporate Controller; Coby A. Holley, Vice President, Investments; Robin E. Mather, Vice President, Business Development; Stuart H. Hutchison, Divisional Vice President (Southern California and Pacific Northwest Divisions); Richard E. Scott, Divisional Vice President (Northern California Division); Eugene Uhlman,David A. Vicars, Divisional Vice President (Texas and Florida Divisions); and Patrick T. Whalen, Vice President, Construction Management; and David A. Vicars, Vice President (Southeast Division, which includes Florida and Texas).& Facilities Management.

Competition

Our properties compete for tenants with similarcomparable properties located in our markets primarily on the basis of location, rent charged,rental rate, services provided and the design and condition of improvements. Competition in the market areas we operate in is significant and has from time to time negatively impacted occupancy levels and rental rates of, and increased the operating expenses of, certain of our properties. Competition may be accelerated by any increase in availability of funds for investment in real estate, because barriers to entry can be relatively low for those with the necessary capital. The demand for space in our markets is impacted by general economic conditions, which can affect the local competition for tenants. Sublease space and unleased developments have from time to time created competition among operators in certain markets in which the Company operates. We also competeRefer to “Management Discussion and Analysis—Analysis of Net Income” for property acquisitions with entities that have greater financial resources than the Company.a discussion of trends in our occupancy levels, rental rates, and operating expenses.

We believe we possess several distinguishing characteristics and strategies, some of which are described below under “Objectives and Strategies,” that enable us to compete effectively. In addition, we believe our personnel are among the most experienced in these real estate markets. The Company’s facilities are part of a comprehensive system encompassing standardized procedures and integrated reporting and information networks.

We believe that the significant operating and financial experience of our executive officers and directors combined with the Company’s capital structure, national investment scope, geographic diversity, financial stability, and economies of scale should enable us to compete effectively.

Objectives and Strategies

Our primary objective is to grow shareholderstockholder value in a low-risk,risk appropriate and stable manner by maximizing the net cash flow generated by our existing properties, as well as prudently seeking opportunities for growth through acquisitions and development that generatewith attractive risk-adjusted returns on invested capital.

We seek to optimize themaximize net cash flow of our existing properties by maximizingoptimizing occupancy levels and rental rates, while minimizing capital expenditures and leasehold improvements. Below are the primary elements of our strategy:

Concentration in favorable markets: We believe that our properties generally are located in markets that have favorable characteristics such as above average population, job, and income growth, as well as higherhigh education levels. In addition, we believe our business parks are generally in markets with higher barrierthan average barriers to entry markets that are close to critical infrastructure, middle to high income housing or universities and have easy access to major transportation arteries. We believe that these characteristics contribute to favorableproperty operating cash flow stability and growth.

Standard build outs and finishes: We generally seek to configure our rentable space with standard buildouts and finishes that meet the needs of a wide variety of tenants, minimizing the need for specialized and costly tenant improvements and enabling space to be “move-in ready” quickly upon vacancy. We believe this makes our space more attractive to potential tenants, allows tenants to move in more quickly and seamlessly, and reduces the cost of capital improvements, relative to real estate operators that offer specialized finishes or build outs. Also, such flexibility facilitates our ability to offer diverse sizes and configurations to meet potential customer’s needs, as well as to change space sizes for existing customers when their needs change, at the low relative cost of a standard configuration.  change.

Large, Diverse Parks: Our business parks are generally concentrated in large complexes of diverse buildings, with a variety of available space sizes and configurations that we can offer to tenants. We believe that this allows us to attract a greater number of potential tenants to our spaceparks and minimizes the loss of existing customers when their space requirements change.

5


Table of Contents

Smaller tenants and diverse tenant base with shorter-term leases: By concentrating on smaller spaces, we seek to reach thea large number of smaller tenants in the market. We believe this focus gives us a competitive edge as most

6


institutional owners focus primarily on large users. Small users perceive more incremental value from the level of customer service that we offer. We also believe having smaller tenants improves our diversity of tenants across industries, which improves the stability of our cash flows. In addition, our lease term tends to be shorter,short, generally an average of three and a half years, which we believe allows us to more quickly capture increases in market rents in our high-growth markets. At December 31, 2017,2021, our average spacesuite size iswas approximately 5,000 rentable square feet per tenant, and no individual tenant, other thanwe had only four customers – the U.S. Government, representsAmazon Inc., KZ Kitchen Cabinet & Stone, and Luminex Corporation – representing 1.0% or more than 1% of our annualized rental income.

Decentralized operating strategy: Our local market management isteams are extremely knowledgeable in their respective markets and are empowered, within a prescribed decision and metrics framework, to make many leasing rate,and capital and lease term decisions in a manner which we believe maximizes the return on investment on leasinglease transactions. We believe this decentralized approach allows us to be nimbler and more nimble and effectiveefficient in our decision making, and more effectively price and market our space, relative to a more centralized approach.

Superior Service to Customers: We seek to provide a superior level of service to our customers in order to maintain occupancy and increase rental rates, as well as minimize customer turnover. The Company’s property management offices are located on-site, helping the Company maintain its properties and providing customers with convenient access to management, while conveying a sense of quality, order, and security. We believe that our personnel are among the most experienced and effective in the real estate industryprofessionals in our markets. The Company has significantextensive experience in acquiring properties managed by others and thereafter improving customer satisfaction, occupancy levels, retention rates and rental income by implementing established customer service programs.

In addition, we seek to expand through acquisitions or development activities that generate attractive returns on invested capital, as follows:

Acquire facilities in targeted markets at prudent price levels: We have a disciplined capital allocation approach, seeking to purchase properties at prices that are not significantly in excess of the cost to develop similar facilities (i.e. replacement cost), which we believe reduces our risk and maximizes long term returns. We seek generally to acquire in our existing markets, which we believe have favorable growth characteristics. We also believe acquiring in our existing markets leverages our operating efficiencies. We would consider expanding to additional markets with similar favorable characteristics of our existing markets if we could acquire sufficient scale (generally at least 2 million rentable square feet); however, we have no current plans or immediate prospects to do so.scale.

Redevelop existing real estate facilities: Certain of our existing business parks were developed in or near areas that have been undergoing gentrification andwith an influx of residential development, and, as a result, certain buildings in our business parks may have higher and better and higher uses as residential space. While residential space is generally not a core asset for us, weuses. We will seek to identify potential candidates for redevelopment inwithin our portfolio, and plan towhere appropriate will leverage the expertise and scale of existing operators and developers.developers should we pursue redevelopment of any of our properties. For example, in The Mile in Tysons, Virginia, as noted above, we demolished an existing building and developed Highgate at The Mile, a 395-unit apartment building, with a joint venture partner,partner. In 2019, we successfully rezoned the remainder of The Mile, allowing us to pursue the development of additional multifamily and mixed-use projects. In 2020, we demolished a 395-unit apartmentvacant office building and are seeking entitlements for another multi-familybegan developing our second multifamily property, Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex to be built following demolishment of an existing 123,000 square foot office building.with the same joint venture partner. There can be no assurance as to the level of conversionadditional redevelopment opportunities throughout our portfolio in the future.

Financing Strategy

Overview of financing strategy and sources of capital: As a REIT, we generally distribute substantially all of our “REIT taxable income” to our shareholdersstockholders each year, which relative to a taxable C corporation, limits the amount of cash flow from operations that we can retain for investments.investment purposes. As a result, in order to expand our asset base, access to capital is important.

Our financial profile is characterized by strong credit metrics, including low leverage relative to our total capitalization and operating cash flows. Our credit profile and ratings enable us to effectively access both the public and private capital markets to raise capital. We will seek to maintain our current credit profile and ratings.

Sources of capital available to us include retained cash flow, the issuance of preferred and common securities,equity, the issuance of medium and long-term debt, joint venture financing, and the sale of properties. We viewexisting properties, and borrowing off our revolving line of credit, as well as short-term bank loans, as “bridge” capital.credit.

Historically, we have financed our cash investment activities primarily with retained operating cash flow and the issuance of preferred securities.equity.

7

6


We select amongfrom the sources of capital available to us based upon relative cost, availability, anddesired leverage levels, nature of the desireinvestment opportunities for leverage,which the capital will be used, as well as intangibleother factors such as the impact of covenants in the case of debt.

Retained Operating Cash Flow: Although we are required to generally distribute substantially allto our stockholders at least 90% of our “REIT taxable income” to our shareholders,each year, we have nonetheless been able to retain operating cash flow to the extent that our tax depreciation exceeds our maintenance capital expenditures. In recent years, we have retained an average of $40 to $50$60 million in operating cash flow per year.

Perpetual Preferred Equity: We view preferred equity as an important source of capital over the long term, because it reduces interestterm. We have historically favored perpetual preferred equity as a source of capital due to the low dividend rate, andwhen compared to non-seasoned preferred issuers, no refinancing risks asrisk and the dividend rate isbeing fixed and there are no refinancing requirements.for life. In addition, the consequences of defaulting on required preferred distributions are less severe than with debt. The preferred shareholders may elect two additional directors if six quarterly distributions go unpaid, whether or not consecutive. However, rates and market conditions for the issuance of preferred securities can be volatile or inefficient from time to time. As of December 31, 2017,2021, we have $959.8$755.0 million in preferred securities outstanding (excluding securities that were redeemed on January  3, 2018) with an average coupon rate of 5.40%5.08%. For a discussion regarding the January 3, 2018 redemption, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis- Liquidity and Capital Resources- Redemption of Preferred Stock.”

Medium or long-term debt: We have broad powersIn addition to borrow in furtheranceborrowing from our revolving line of our objectives. Wecredit, we may consider the public issuance or private placement of senior unsecuredseek to issue term debt in the future in an effort to diversify our sources of capital. We may consider issuance in the public bond market or private placement of senior unsecured debt depending on the nature and timing of the associated use of capital.

Common equity: We believe that the market for our common equity is liquid and, as a result, common equity is a significantviable potential source of capital.

Tax advantaged equity: As noted above, we have the ability to offer common or preferred operating partnership units with economic characteristics that are similar to our common and preferred stock, but provide the seller the opportunity to defer the recognition of a tax gain.

Bridge financingCredit Facility: We have a $250.0$400.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Credit Facility”), which we use from time to time as temporary “bridge” financing, along with short-term bank loans when necessary, until we are able to raisereplace it with longer-term capital. As of December 31, 2017,2021, there were no borrowingswas $32.0 million outstanding on our Credit Facility andwith an average borrowing rate of 0.8%. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the Company repaid, in full, the balance outstanding as of December 31, 2021. We had no short-term bank loans.

Investments in Real Estate Facilities

As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company owned and operated 28.027.7 million rentable square feet comprised ofcomprising 97 business parks in six states compared to 27.7 million rentable square feet comprising 98 business parks in six states andas of December 31, 2020. The Company also held a 95.0% interest in a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex compared to 28.1 million rentable square feet comprisedand a 98.2% interest in a 411-unit multifamily apartment complex development as of 99 business parks atboth December 31, 2016.  2021 and 2020.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates

The Company’s Restated Bylaws provide that the Company may engage in transactions with affiliates provided that a purchase or sale transaction with an affiliate is (i) approved by a majority of the Company’s independent directors and (ii) fair to the Company based on an independent appraisal or fairness opinion.

EmployeesInsurance

As of December 31, 2017, the Company employed 158 individuals, primarily personnel engaged in property operations.

Insurance

The Company believes that its properties are adequately insured. Facilities operated by the Company have historically been covered by comprehensive insurance, including fire, earthquake, wind damage and liability coverage from nationally recognized carriers, subject to customary levelsdeductibles.

Compliance with Government Regulations

We are subject to various laws, ordinances, and regulations, including various federal, state, and local regulations that apply generally to the ownership of deductibles.real property and the operation of such properties. These include various laws and government regulations concerning environmental matters, labor matters and employee safety and health matters. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors” below for a discussion of certain risks related to such government regulations, including risks related to compliance with (i) the Americans with Disabilities Act and with related regulations, (ii) laws and regulations adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and similar public health emergencies, government, (iii) federal or state privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), (iv) environmental

8


remediation requirements, and (v) laws and regulations relating to real property ownership, including property taxes and zoning changes or violations. Except for regulations discussed therein, we are not aware of any government regulations that have resulted or that we expect will result in compliance costs that had or will have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.

Environmental Matters

We are committed to a long-term environmental stewardship program that reduces emissions of hazardous materials into the environment and the remediation of identified existing environmental concerns, including environmentally-friendly capital initiatives, and building and operating properties with a high structural resilience and low obsolescence. We accrue environmental assessments and estimated remediation costs when it is probable that such efforts will be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. Our current practice is to conduct environmental investigations in connection with property acquisitions. Although there can be no assurance, we are not aware of any environmental contamination of any of our facilities, which individually or in the aggregate would be material to our overall business, financial condition, or results of operations. Compliance with laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those regarding the discharge of material into the environment, has not had any material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of the Company.

Human Capital Management

The Company’s human capital management objectives are to attract, retain, and develop the highest quality talent. To support these objectives, the Company develops its employees to prepare them for critical roles and leadership positions for the future and fosters a team-oriented culture aimed at making the workplace more engaging and inclusive. The Company works to acquire talent and facilitate internal talent mobility to create a high-performing and diverse workforce that is empowered to make thoughtful decisions, eager to collaborate, and motivated to provide an elevated level of service to our customers. The Company employed 156 people as of December 31, 2021, comprised primarily of personnel engaged in property operations. Our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee oversees our sustainability efforts, including our environmental, social, and governance initiatives.

Diversity and Inclusion: At PSB, we strive to create a diverse and inclusive environment where all employees feel valued, included, and excited to be part of our team. For example, we strive to include a subset of diverse candidates as we seek to fill open positions. With team members from all different races, backgrounds, and life experiences, we celebrate inclusion and value the diversity each person brings to PSB. Our employee population is approximately 50% female, with 35% in a supervisory role, and approximately 44% have self-identified as Hispanic or Latino, Native American, Pacific Islander, Asian, Black or African American, or of two or more races, with 27% in a supervisory role. Our workforce also has generational diversity: 39% millennials (aged 27-39), 47% generation X (aged 40-60), and 8% baby boomers (aged 61-78).

Compensation Policies: PSB believes in aligning employee compensation with our short- and long-term performance goals and to provide compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate, and retain employees who are crucial to our success. We tailor our compensation programs to each employee group to ensure competitiveness in the market and to drive employee engagement. The Company provides the opportunity for employees to own a part of the Company through equity grants for senior members of our team, with nearly 57% of our exempt employees having received equity grants in the form of restricted stock units or stock option awards.

Health and Wellness: PSB is committed to its employees’ overall health and well-being. We want to help them feel happy, healthy, socially connected, and purposeful. Our goal is to provide tools and resources to help empower our employees to explore what they need and to evaluate for themselves what makes sense in achieving a healthy and balanced lifestyle. We partner with our health care provider to promote health and wellness programs to incentivize our employees to maintain an active and healthy lifestyle.

We provide benefits to all of our employees and dependents, including medical, dental, vision, flexible and health savings accounts, and income protection plans. We also offer a 401(k) plan with matching employer contributions to help our employees prepare for retirement.

Supporting Our Employees During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The COVID-19 pandemic brought varying challenges to each of our team members. We took a multipronged approach in providing resources, tools and added protocols that focused on the safety of employees and their families while still allowing us to support the customers we serve during these unprecedented times. For example, our field operations and business park protocols were quickly modified to ensure a safe workspace. Additionally, we had a swift transition to work-from-home for our entire workforce, where applicable, by utilizing various existing technology platforms and implementing modern technologies necessary to accommodate the situation. We provided additional incentive pay for certain personnel.

79


Additionally, we provided an employee assistance program, which offers employees mental health, financial, and legal support to assist them in their well-being during these unique times.

Substantially

Training, Development, and Recognition: We hire and develop outstanding team members to lease and manage all of our properties and deliver market-leading service to our customers. Our decentralized, vertically integrated platform gives us the Company’s properties have received Phase I environmental reviews. Such reviews have not revealed, norflexibility to meet the needs of our customers, react quickly to local market dynamics, and contain operating expenses and capital expenditures, and allows us to keep all property management and leasing activity in-house, maximize cost efficiencies, and speed up decision making.

We offer training programs for new team members and ongoing training and development programs for our entire workforce. We are able to accomplish this, in part, by utilizing an online platform that provides a central repository for accessing training courses and reference materials. We also reinforce our Company culture by celebrating major accomplishments, stand-out performances, and individual milestones through various recurring recognition programs and events throughout the year, and offer incentive programs designed to recognize and reward outstanding achievements. We work towards development of our employees and creating opportunities for them to advance. For example, where and when possible, we seek to fill open positions with internal candidates.

Communication and Engagement:Given the geographically dispersed nature of our business, it is management awareimportant for us to ensure that employees feel they are informed and included. We communicate through various channels, such as monthly meetings, frequent email and collaboration communications, updates from corporate, company intranet postings, engagement surveys and newsletters. Employee engagement is instrumental in understanding the effectiveness of any probableour strategies, thus we conduct various engagement surveys through the year to help us measure commitment, motivation and engagement, as well as gain employee feedback that helps us improve operational success through employee satisfaction and efficiency.

Community and Social Impact: We encourage employees to give back to our communities by providing two “volunteer” days to all employees annually which can be used by participating in group volunteer events or reasonably possible environmental costs that management believes would haveindividually. We also offer a material adverse effect oncharitable gift matching program, providing a donation match up to the Company’s business, assets or results of operations, nor is the Company aware of any potentially material environmental liability. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for additional information.preset limit per employee annually to qualifying 501(c)(3) organizations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should consider the risks described below that we believe may be material to investors in evaluating the Company. This section contains forward-looking statements, and in considering these statements, you should refer to the qualifications and limitations on our forward-looking statements that are described in Item 1, “Business — Forward-Looking Statements.“Business.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have significant exposure to real estate risk.

Since our business consists primarily of acquiring, developing, and operating real estate, we are subject to the risks related to the ownership and operation of real estate that can adversely impact our business and financial condition. Certain significant costs, such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance, generally are not reduced even when a property’s rental income is reduced. In addition, environmental and tax laws, interest rate levels, the availability of financing and other factors may affect real estate values and property income. Furthermore, the supply of commercial space fluctuates with market conditions.

Since we derive substantially all our income from real estate operations, we are subject to the following general risks of acquiring and owning real estate related assets that could result in reduced revenues, increased expenses, increased capital expenditures, or increased borrowings, which could negatively impact our operating results, cash flow available for distribution or reinvestment and our stock price:

·changes in the national, state and local economic climate and real estate conditions, such as oversupply of or reduced demand for commercial real estate space and changes in market rental rates;

·how prospective tenants perceive the attractiveness, convenience and safety of our properties;

·difficulties in consummating and financing acquisitions and developments on advantageous terms and the failure of acquisitions and developments to perform as expected;

·our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance;

·natural disasters, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods, which could exceed the aggregate limits of our insurance coverage;

·the expense of periodically renovating, repairing and re-letting spaces;

·the impact of environmental protection laws;

·compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations;

·increasing operating and maintenance costs, including property taxes, insurance and utilities, if these increased costs cannot be passed through to customers;

·adverse changes in tax, real estate and zoning laws and regulations;

·increasing competition from other commercial properties in our market;

·tenant defaults and bankruptcies;

·tenants’ right to sublease space; and

·concentration of properties leased to non-rated private companies with uncertain financial strength.

changes in the national, state, and local economic climate and real estate conditions, such as oversupply or reduced demand for commercial real estate space and changes in market rental rates;

how prospective tenants perceive the attractiveness, convenience, and safety of our properties;

difficulties in consummating and financing acquisitions and developments on advantageous terms and the failure of acquisitions and developments to perform as expected;

810


our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance, and insurance;

natural disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, hurricanes, and floods, which could exceed the aggregate limits of our insurance coverage;

the consequences of changes in climate, including severe weather events, and the steps taken to prevent climate change, could result in increased capital expenditures and expenses

the expense of periodically renovating, repairing, and re-letting spaces;

the impact of environmental protection laws;

compliance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations;

increasing operating and maintenance costs, including property taxes, insurance, and utilities, if these increased costs cannot be passed through to customers;

the result of a future California statewide ballot initiative (or similar legislative or regulatory actions) that could remove the property tax protections of Proposition 13 with respect to our California real estate and result in substantial increases in our California property tax bills;

adverse changes in tax, real estate and zoning (particularly the rezoning of areas where our properties are located) laws and regulations;

increasing competition from other commercial properties in our market;

tenant defaults and bankruptcies;

tenants’ right to sublease space; and

concentration of properties leased to non-rated private companies with uncertain financial strength.

There is significant competition among commercial property operators: Other commercial properties compete with our properties for tenants. Some of the competing properties may be newer and better located than our properties. Competition in the market areas in which many of our properties are located is significant and has affected our occupancy levels, rental rates, and operating expenses. We also expect that new properties will be built in our markets. In addition, we compete with other buyers, some of which are larger than us, for attractive commercial properties. Therefore, we may not be able to grow as rapidly as we would like.

We may encounter significant delays and expense in re-letting vacant space,or we may not be able to re-let space at existing rates, in each case resultingin losses of income: When leases expire, we may incur expenses in retrofitting space and we may not be able to re-lease the space on the same terms. Certain leases provide customers with the right to terminate early if they pay a fee. As of December 31, 2017,  1,8752021, excluding assets held for sale, 2,105 leases, representing 6.25.8 million, or 23.3%22.5%, of the leased square footage of our total portfolio, or 23.8%21.9% of annualized rental income, are scheduled to expire in 2018.2022. While we have estimated our cost of renewing leases that expire in 2018,2022, our estimates could be wrong. If we are unable to re-lease space promptly, if the terms are significantly less favorable than anticipated or if the costs are higher, our operating results, cash available for distribution or reinvestment and stock price could be negatively impacted.

Tenant defaults and bankruptcies may reduce our cash flow anddistributions: We may have difficulty collecting from customers in default, particularly if they declare bankruptcy. Since many of our customers are non-rated private companies, this risk may be enhanced. There is inherent uncertainty in a customer’s ability to continue paying rent if they are in bankruptcy. This could negatively affect our operating results, cash available for distribution or reinvestment and stock price.

Natural disasters or terrorist attacks could cause damage to our facilities that is not covered by insurance, and could increase costs, reduce revenues, and otherwise impair our operating results: While we maintain insurance coverage for the losses caused by earthquakes, fire, or hurricanes, we could suffer uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance policy limits for such occurrences. Approximately 40.1%39.4% of our properties are located in California and are generally in areas that are subject to risks of earthquake-related damage. In the event of an earthquake, fire, hurricane, or other natural disaster, we would remain liable on any mortgage debt or other unsatisfied obligations

11


related to that property. In addition, we may not have sufficient insurance coverage for losses caused by a terrorist attack, or such insurance may not be available or cost-effective. Significant natural disasters, terrorist attacks, threats of future terrorist attacks, or resulting wider armed conflict could have negative impacts on the U.S. economy, reducing demand for our rental space and impairing our operating results, even if our specific losses were covered. This could negatively affect our operating results, cash available for distribution or reinvestment and stock price.

Consequences of climate change, including severe weather events, and the steps taken to prevent climate change, could result in increased capital expenditures, increased expenses, and reduced revenues: Direct and indirect impacts of climate change, such as increased destructive weather events, floods, fires, and droughts could result in significant damage to our facilities, increase our costs, including our property insurance costs, or reduce demand for our facilities. Governmental, political, and societal pressure could (i) require costly changes to future newly developed facilities, or require retrofitting of our existing facilities, to reduce carbon emissions through multiple avenues including changes to insulation, space configuration, lighting, heating, and air conditioning, and (ii) increase energy costs as a result of switching to less carbon-intensive, but more expensive, sources of energy to operate our facilities.

The illiquidity of our real estate investments may prevent us fromadjusting our portfolio to respond to market changes: There may be delays and difficulties in selling real estate. Therefore, we cannot easily change our portfolio when economic conditions change. In addition, when we sell properties at significant gains upon sale, it can increase our distribution requirements, thus making it difficult to retain and reinvest the sales proceeds. Also, REIT tax laws may impose negative consequences if we sell properties held for less than two years.

We may be adversely affected by changes in laws: laws and regulations: Increases in income and service taxes may reduce our cash flow and ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.stockholders. Additionally, any changes in the tax law applicable to REITs may adversely affect taxation of us and/or our shareholders.stockholders. Our properties are also subject to various federal, state, and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and safety codes. Ifcodes, that may be changed in ways that require significant costs to maintain compliance. Our properties are subject to state and local zoning requirements. We are and in the future we failmay be subject to comply with thesegovernment initiatives to change the zoning requirements governmental authorities could fine us or courts could award damages against us. We believein places where our properties comply with all significant legal requirements. However,are located, and if such efforts are successful, the value of impacted properties may be materially reduced. There is no assurance that we will be compensated for economic losses in these requirements could change in a way that could negatively affect our operating results, cash available for distribution or reinvestment and stock price.cases.

9


We may incur significant environmental remediation costs: As an owner and operator of real properties, under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, we are required to clean up spills or other releases of hazardous or toxic substances on or from our properties. Certain environmental laws impose liability whether or not the owner or buyer knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. In some cases, liability may not be limited to the value of the property. The presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination, whether from environmental or microbial issues, also may adversely affect our ability to sell, lease, operate, or encumber our facilities.

We have conducted preliminary environmental assessments of most of our properties (and conduct these assessments in connection with property acquisitions) to evaluate the environmental condition of, and potential environmental liabilities associated with, our properties. These assessments generally consist of an investigation of environmental conditions at the property (including soil or groundwater sampling or analysis if appropriate), as well as a review of available information regarding the site and publicly available data regarding conditions at other sites in the vicinity. In connection with these property assessments, our operations and recent property acquisitions, we have become aware that prior operations or activities at some properties or from nearby locations have or may have resulted in contamination to the soil or groundwater at these properties. In circumstances where our environmental assessments disclose potential or actual contamination, we may attempt to obtain indemnifications and, in appropriate circumstances, we obtain limited environmental insurance in connection with the properties acquired, but we cannot assure you that such protections will be sufficient to cover actual future liabilities nor that our assessments have identified all such risks. Although we cannot provide any assurance, based on the preliminary environmental assessments, we are not aware of any environmental contamination of our facilities material to our overall business, financial condition, or results of operations.

There has been an increasing number of claims and litigation against owners and managers of rental properties relating to moisture infiltration, which can result in mold or other property damage. When we receive a complaint concerning moisture infiltration, condensation, or mold problems and/or become aware that an air quality concern exists, we implement corrective measures in accordance with guidelines and protocols we have developed with the assistance of outside experts. We seek to work proactively with our customers to resolve moisture infiltration and mold-related issues, subject to our contractual limitations on liability for such claims. However, we can give no

12


assurance that material legal claims relating to moisture infiltration and the presence of, or exposure to, mold will not arise in the future.

Any such environmental remediation costs or issues, including any potential ongoing impacts on rent or operating expenses, could negatively impact our operating results, cash flow available for distribution or reinvestment and our stock price.

Operating costs, including property taxes, could increase: We could be subject to increases in insurance premiums, property andor other taxes, repair and maintenance costs, payroll, utility costs, workers compensation, and other operating expenses due to variousnumerous factors such as inflation, labor shortages, commodity and energy price increases, weather, changes to governmental safety and real estate use limitations, as well as other governmental actions. Our property tax expense, which totaled $41.0$48.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, generally depends upon the assessed value of our real estate facilities as determined by assessors and government agencies, and accordingly could be subject to substantial increases if such agencies changed their valuation approaches or opinions or if new laws are enacted.enacted, especially if new approaches are adopted or laws are enacted that result in increased property tax assessments in states or municipalities where we have a high concentration of facilities.

We have exposure to increased property tax in California:Approximately $142.9 million of our 2021 net operating income is from our properties in California, and we incurred approximately $17.0 million in related property tax expense. Due to the impact of Proposition 13, which generally limits increases in assessed values to 2% per year, the assessed value and resulting property tax we pay is significantly less than it would be if the properties were assessed at current values. Our property tax expense could increase substantially, which would adversely affect our cash flow from operations and net income.

We must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, fire and safety regulations and zoning requirements, which can require significant expenditures: All of our properties must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and with related regulations (the “ADA”). The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities,” but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Various state laws impose similar requirements. A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state laws could lead to government imposed fines on us and/or litigation, which could also involve an award of damages to individuals affected by the non-compliance. In addition, we must operate our properties in compliance with numerous local fire and safety regulations, building codes, zoning requirements and other land use regulations, all of which are subject to change and could become more costly to comply with in the future. The cost of compliance with these requirements can be substantial, and could reduce cash otherwise available for distribution to shareholders.stockholders. Failure to comply with these requirements could also affect the marketability and rentability of our real estate facilities.

We incur liability from customer and employment-related claims: From time to time we have to make monetary settlements or defend actions or arbitration to resolve customer or employment-related claims and disputes. Settling any such liabilities could negatively impact our earnings and cash available for distribution to shareholders,stockholders, and could also adversely affect our ability to sell, lease, operate, or encumber affected facilitiesfacilities.

10


Our development of real estate can subject us to certain risks: AsWe are engaged in significant real estate development. For example, as of December 31, 2017,2021, we have a 95%98.2% interest in a completed 395-unit411-unit multifamily apartment complex development that isand in lease-up with an aggregate estimated cost2019 we successfully rezoned the remainder of $115.6 million (includingThe Mile and are able to pursue the fair valuedevelopment of the land).additional multifamily and mixed use projects. We are also seeking entitlements for an additional multifamily development and are considering the potential redevelopment of other facilities in our portfolio. Development or redevelopment of facilities are subject to a number of risks, including construction delays, complications in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy and other governmental permits, cost overruns, failures of our development partners, financing risks, and the possible inability to meet expected occupancy and rent levels. In addition, we do not have experience in multifamily development and are relying to some degree on the experience of our joint venture partner. As a result of these risks, our development projects may be worth less or may generate less revenue than we believed at the time of development, negatively affecting our operating results.development. Any of the foregoing risks could negatively impact our operating results, cash flow available for distribution or reinvestment and our stock price. In addition, we may be unable to successfully integrate and effectively manage the properties we develop, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

GlobalWe are subject to risks from the COVID-19 pandemic and we may in the future be subject to risks from other public health crises.

Beginning in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally, including to every state in the United States, adversely affecting public health and economic activity. Our business is subject to risks from the COVID-19 pandemic, including, among others:

13


illness or death of our employees or customers, negative impacts to the economic environment and to our customers which could reduce the demand for commercial property space or reduce our ability to collect rent, or potential regulatory action to close certain of our facilities that were determined not to be an “essential business” or for other reasons, limit our ability to complete development and redevelopment projects;

risk that future waves of infection, including those resulting from new variants, such as Delta or Omicron, or from additional pandemics, could result in new or reinstituted government restrictions or requirements;

risk that the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could reduce consumer confidence and result in an elevated level of move-outs of our long-term customers, resulting in a reduction in rental income due to occupancy reductions and increased “rent roll down” due to new customers having lower rental rates than departing customers; and

risk of negative impacts on the cost and availability of debt and equity capital as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have a material impact upon our capital and growth plans.

We believe that the degree to which the COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacts our business, operating results, cash flows and/or financial condition will be driven primarily by the duration, spread and severity of the pandemic itself, the speed and effectiveness of vaccine and treatment developments and distribution, including against variants such as the Delta and Omicron variants, public adoption rates of vaccines, including booster shots, the duration of indirect economic impacts such as recession, dislocation in capital markets, and job loss, and potential longer term changes in consumer behavior, all of which are uncertain and difficult to predict. As a result, we are not able at this time to estimate the effect of these factors on our business, but the adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be material. Future pandemics or public health crises could have similar impacts.

Economic conditions can adversely affect our business, financial condition, growth, and access to capital.

Economic conditions in the areas we operate, capital markets, global economic conditions, and other events or factors could adversely affect rental demand for our real estate, our ability to grow our business and acquire new facilities, to access capital, as well as the value of our real estate. Such conditions, which could negatively impact our operating results, cash flow available for distribution or reinvestment and our stock price, include the following:

Commercial credit markets: Our results of operations and share price are sensitive to volatility in the credit markets. From time to time, the commercial real estate debt markets experience volatility as a result of variousnumerous factors, including changing underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies. This may result in lenders increasing the cost for debt financing, which could affect the economic viability of any acquisition or development activities we may undertake or otherwise increase our costs of borrowing. Conversely, to the extent that debt becomes cheaper or underwriting terms become more favorable, it could increase the overall amount of capital being invested in real estate, allowing more competitors to bid for facilities that we may wish to acquire, reducing the potential yield from acquisitions or preventing us from acquiring assets we might otherwise wish to acquire.

Capital markets: The issuance of perpetual preferred securities historically has been a significant source of capital to grow our business, and we have considered issuing unsecured debt publicly or in private transactions. We also consider issuance of our common equity a potential source of capital. Our ability to access these sources of capital can be adversely affected by challenging market conditions, which can increase the cost of issuance of preferred equity and debt, and reduce the value of our common shares,stock, making such sources of capital less attractive or not feasible. We believe that we have sufficient working capital and capacity under our credit facilities and our retained cash flow from operations to continue to operate our business as usual and meet our current obligations. However, if we were unable to issue public equity or borrow at reasonable rates, that could limit the earnings growth that might otherwise result from the acquisition and development of real estate facilities.

Asset valuations: Market volatility makes the valuation of our properties difficult. There may be significant uncertainty in the valuation, or in the stability of the value, of our properties, which could result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge in earnings. Reductions in the value of our assets could result in a reduction in the value of our common shares.stock.

Potential negative impacts upon demand for our space and customers’ ability to pay: We believe that our current and prospective customers are susceptible to global and local economic conditions as well as the impact of capital

14


markets, asset valuations, and commercial credit markets, which could result in an impairment of our customers’ existing business operations or curtail plans for growth. Such impairment could reduce demand for our rental space, or make it difficult for customers to fulfill their obligations to us under their leases.

Changes in the method of determining LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, may adversely affect interest expense related to outstanding Credit Facility.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC"), which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its preferred alternative rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR (“USD LIBOR”) in derivatives and other financial contracts. Subsequently, in November 2020, the Intercontinental Exchange Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would consult on its intention to cease the publication of the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR settings immediately following December 31, 2021, and the remaining USD LIBOR settings, including overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month, immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023.

We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by the FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payments could change. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.

We have one agreement that is indexed to LIBOR and are evaluating transitioning the agreement to either reference the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or an alternative rate in preparation for the discontinuation of LIBOR, but it is possible that these changes may have an adverse impact on our financing costs as compared to LIBOR in the long term. It is also possible that transitioning to an alternative reference rate may be challenging, especially if we cannot agree with the respective counterparty about how to make the transition.

There continue to be many uncertainties regarding a transition from LIBOR. Alternative rates and other market changes related to the replacement of LIBOR, including the introduction of financial products and changes in market practices, may lead to risk modeling and valuation challenges, such as adjusting interest rate accrual calculations and building a term structure for an alternative rate.

The introduction of an alternative rate also may create additional basis risk and increased volatility as alternative rates are phased in and utilized in parallel with LIBOR.

The acquisition of existing properties is a significant component of our long-term growth strategy, and acquisitions of existing properties are subject to risks that may adversely affect our growth and financial results.

We acquire existing properties, either in individual transactions or portfolios offered by other commercial real estate owners. In addition to the general risks related to real estate described above, we are also subject to the following risks associated with the acquisition of real estate facilities which could negatively impact our operating results, cash flow available for distribution or reinvestment and our stock price:

11


Due diligence could be insufficient: Failure to identify all significant circumstances or conditions that affect the value, rentability, or costs of operation of an acquired facility, such as unidentified structural, environmental, zoning, or marketability issues, could jeopardize realization of anticipated earnings from an acquisition and negatively impact our operating results.

We could fail to successfully integrate acquired properties into our platform: Failures to integrate acquired properties into our operating platform, such as a failure to maintain existing relationships with customers due to changes in processes, standards, customer service, could temporarily or permanently impair our operating results.

We compete with other real estate operators for facilities: We face significant competition for suitable acquisition properties from other real estate investors, including other publicly traded real estate investment trusts and private institutional investors. As a result, we may be unable to acquire additional properties we desire or the purchase price for desirable properties may be significantly increased, reducing potential yields from acquisitions.

15


Acquired properties are subject to property tax reappraisals, which occur following the acquisition and can be difficult to estimate: Facilities that we acquire are subject to property tax reappraisal, which can substantially increase ongoing property taxes. The reappraisal process is subject to a significant degree of uncertainty because it involves the judgment of governmental agencies regarding real estate values and other factors. In connection with underwriting future or recent acquisitions of properties, if our estimates of property taxes following reappraisal are too low, we may not realize anticipated earnings from an acquisition.

We are subject to laws and governmental regulations and actions that affect our operating results and financial condition.

Our business is subject to regulation under a wide variety of U.S. federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies including those applicable to our status as a REIT, and those imposed by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), as well as applicable local, state, and national labor laws. Although we have policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws and regulations, failure to comply with the various laws and regulations may result in civil and criminal liability, fines and penalties, increased costs of compliance and restatement of our financial statements and could also affect the marketability of our real estate facilities.

In response to current economic conditions or the current political environment or otherwise, laws and regulations could be implemented or changed in ways that adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, such as legislation that could otherwise increase operating costs. Such changes could also adversely affect the operations of our customers, which could affect the price and demand for our space as well as our customers’ ability to pay their rent. For example, on November 3, 2020, Californians passed a ballot measure that creates the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA.”) The CPRA amends and expands the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA,”) which went into effect on January 1, 2020. The CPRA, which goes into effect on January 1, 2023, provides new rights and amends existing rights found in the CCPA. It also creates a new privacy enforcement authority, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CalPPA.”) The CPRA grants the Attorney General and the CalPPA the authority to issue regulations on a wide range of topics. It therefore remains unclear what, if any, modifications will be made to the CPRA or how it will be interpreted. While we believe we have developed processes to comply with current privacy requirements, a regulatory agency may not agree with certain of our implementation decisions, which could subject us to litigation, regulatory actions or changes to our business practices that could increase costs or reduce revenues. Other states have also considered or are considering privacy laws similar to those passed in California. Similar laws may be implemented in other jurisdictions that we do business in and in ways that may be more restrictive than those in California, increasing the cost of compliance, as well as the risk of noncompliance, on our business.

Management transition issues or ineffective succession planning for our CEO and executive management, as well as for our other key employees, may impact the execution of the Company’s strategic plan.

Our CEO is currently on leave and there can be no assurance as to when or if he will return. We have appointed an Interim CEO and Interim Chief Operating Officer to serve during this leave of absence. To the extent this transition to our interim officers, or similar future transitions, are not handled appropriately, the execution of our strategic plan may be impacted. Similarly, if we do not effectively or appropriately identify ready-now succession candidates for CEO and executive management team, this may negatively impact the Company’s ability to meet key strategic goals. Failure to implement a succession plan for other key employees may leave the Company vulnerable to retirements and turnover.

We rely on technology in our operations and failures, inadequacies or interruptions to our service could harm our business.

The execution of our business strategy is heavily dependent on the use of technologies and systems, including the Internet, to access, store, transmit, deliver, and manage information and processes. We rely extensively on third-party vendors to retain data, process transactions, and provide other systems services. The failure, damage, or interruption of these systems, including as a result of power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, hackers, computer worms, viruses and other destructive or disruptive security breaches, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and other catastrophic events could significantly and have a material adverse effect on our business.


16


If our confidential information is compromised or corrupted, including as a result of a cybersecurity breach, our reputation and business relationships could be damaged, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In the ordinary course of our business we acquire and store sensitive data, including personally identifiable information of our prospective and current customers and our employees. The secure processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Although we believe we have taken commercially reasonable steps to protect the security of our confidential information, information security risks have generally increased in recent years due to the rise in modern technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyberattacks. Despite our security measures, we have experienced security breaches due to cyberattacks and additional breaches could occur in the future. In these cases, our information technology and infrastructure could be vulnerable and our or our customers’ or employees’ confidential information could be compromised or misappropriated. Any such breach could result in serious and harmful consequences for us or our customers.

Our confidential information may also be compromised due to programming or human error or malfeasance. We must continually evaluate and adapt our systems and processes to address the evolving threat landscape, and therefore there is no guarantee that they will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches or misuses of data. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and changing requirements applicable to our business from multiple regulatory agencies at the local, state, federal, or international level, compliance with those requirement could also result in additional costs, or we could fail to comply with those requirements due to several reasons such as not being aware of them.

Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, regulatory penalties, disruption to our operations and the services we provide to customers or damage our reputation, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations, reputation, and competitive position. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to discontinue leasing our facilities. Such events could lead to lost future revenues and adversely affect our results of operations and could result in remedial and other costs, fines, or lawsuits, which could be in excess of any available insurance that we have procured.

Risks Related to Our Ownership, Organization and Structure

We would incur adverse tax consequences if we failfailed to qualify as a REIT.REIT and we would have to pay substantial U.S. federal corporate income taxes.

Our cash flow availableREITs are subject to a range of complex organizational and operational requirements. A qualifying REIT does not generally incur U.S. federal corporate income tax on its “REIT taxable income” (generally, taxable income subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for distribution would be reduced if we faildividends paid and excluding net capital gain) that it distributes to qualify as a REIT: its stockholders. We believe that we have qualified as a REIT and we intend to continue to maintain our REIT status.

However, there can be no assurance that we qualify or will continue to qualify as a REIT, because of the highly technical nature of the REIT rules, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, the possibility of unidentified issues in prior periods, or changes in our circumstances, as well as share ownership limits in our articles of incorporation that do not necessarily ensure that our shareholderstockholder base is sufficiently diverse for us to qualify as a REIT. For any year we fail to qualify as a REIT, unless certain relief provisions apply (the granting of such relief could nonetheless result in significant excise or penalty taxes), we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid, we would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our taxable income, and generally we would not be allowed to elect REIT status until the fifth year after such a disqualification. Any taxes, interest, and penalties incurred would reduce our cash available for distributions to shareholdersstockholders and could negatively affect our stock price. However, for years in which we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would not be subject to REIT rules whichthat require us to distribute substantially all of our taxable income to our shareholders.stockholders.

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state, and local taxes, including payroll taxes, taxes on any undistributed income, taxes on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, a 100% excise tax on any transactions with a Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis, and state or local income, franchise, property, and transfer taxes. Moreover, if we have net income from the sale of properties that are “dealer” properties (a “prohibited transaction” under the Code), that income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In addition, our TRSs will be subject to U.S. federal, state, and local corporate

17


income taxes on their net taxable income, if any. Any of these taxes would reduce our cash available for distributions to stockholders and could negatively affect our stock price.

We may need to borrow funds to meet our REIT distribution requirements: requirements.

As a REIT, we mustare required to distribute substantially allat least 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) to our shareholders.stockholders each year. Our income consists primarily of our share of our OP’s income. We intend to make sufficient distributions to qualify as a REIT and otherwise avoid corporate tax. However, differences in timing between income and expenses and the need to make nondeductible expenditures such as capital improvements and principal payments on debt could force us to borrow funds to make necessary shareholderstockholder distributions.

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) will continue to evaluate our dividend rate in light of our actual and projected taxable income, liquidity requirements and other circumstances. Future dividend levels are not determinable at this time.

Potential changesChanges in tax laws could negatively impact us.

The United States Treasury Department and Congress frequently review U.S. federal income tax legislation, regulations, and other guidance. We cannot predict whether, when or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations, or rulings will be adopted. Any legislative action may prospectively or retroactively modify our tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of us or our shareholders. In particular, the legislation passed last December, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and which generally takes effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 (subject to certain exceptions), makes many significant changes to the federal income tax laws that will profoundly impact the taxation of individuals and corporations (both regular C corporations as well as corporations that have elected REIT status). A number of changes that affect non-corporate taxpayers will expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them. These changes will impact us and our shareholders in various ways, some of which are potentially adverse compared to prior law. To date, the Internal Revenue Service has issued only limited guidance with respect to certain of the new provisions, and there are numerous interpretive issues that will require guidance. It is highlystockholders.

12


likely that technical corrections legislation will be needed to clarify certain aspects of the new law and give proper effect to Congressional intent. There can be no assurance, however, that technical corrections needed to prevent unintended or unforeseen tax consequences will be enacted by Congress in the near future or that any corrections made will not have further adverse, unintended or unforeseen tax consequences.

PS has significant influence over us.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, PS owned 7.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock and 7.3 million common units of the OP (100.0% of the common units not owned by the Company). Assuming issuance of the Company’s common stock upon redemption of its partnership units, PS would own 41.9%41.4% (or 14.5 million shares) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2017.2021. In addition, the PS Business Parks name and logo are owned by PS and licensed to the Company under a non-exclusive, royalty-free license agreement. The license can be terminated by either party for any reason with six months written notice. Ronald L. Havner, Jr., the Company’s chairman, is also Chairman of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of PS. Joseph D. Russell, Jr. is a director and former Chief Executive Officer of the Company and also President and Chief Executive Officer of PS. Gary E. Pruitt,Kristy M. Pipes, an independent director of the Company, is also a trustee of PS.PS and Gary E. Pruitt, an independent director of the Company, was also a trustee of PS until he retired from the Board of Trustees of PS in January 2021. Consequently, PS has the ability to significantly influence all matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders,stockholders, including electing directors, changing our articles of incorporation, dissolving, and approving other extraordinary transactions such as mergers, and all matters requiring the consent of the limited partners of the OP. PS’s interest in such matters may differ from other shareholders.stockholders. In addition, PS’s ownership may make it more difficult for another party to take over or acquire our Company without PS’s approval, even if favorable to our public shareholders.stockholders.

Provisions in our organizational documents may prevent changes in control.

In certain circumstances, stockholders might desire a change of control or acquisition of us in order to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our shares or for other reasons. However, current provisions of our articles of incorporation and the powers of our Board could prevent, deter, or delay such a transaction, including (1) restrictions on the acquisition of our shares, (2) the power to issue additional common stock, preferred stock or equity stock on terms approved by the Board without obtaining stockholder approval and (3) the advance notice provisions of our bylaws.

Our articles generally prohibit any person from owning more than 7% of our shares: Our articles of incorporation restrict the number of shares that may be owned by any “person,” and the partnership agreement of our OP contains an anti-takeover provision. No shareholderstockholder (other than PS and certain other specified shareholders)stockholders) may own more than 7% of the outstanding shares of our common stock unless our Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) waives this limitation. We imposed this limitation to avoid, to the extent possible, a concentration of ownership that might jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT. This limitation, however, also makes a change of control much more difficult (if not impossible).difficult. These provisions will prevent future takeover attempts not supported by PS even if a majority of our public shareholdersstockholders consider it to be in their best interests, such as to receive a premium for their shares over market value or for other reasons.


18


Our Board can set the terms of certain securities without shareholderstockholderapproval: Our Board is authorized, without shareholderstockholder approval, to issue up to 50.0 million shares of preferred stock and up to 100.0 million shares of equity stock, in each case in one or more series. Our Board has the right to set the terms of each of these series of stock. Consequently, the Board could set the terms of a series of stock that could make it difficult (if not impossible) for another party to take over our Company even if it might be favorable to our public shareholders.stockholders. Our articles of incorporation also contain other provisions that could have the same effect. We can also cause our OP to issue additional interests for cash or in exchange for property.

The partnership agreement of our OP restricts our ability to enter into mergers: The partnership agreement of our OP generally provides that we may not merge or engage in a similar transaction unless either the limited partners of our OP are entitled to receive the same proportionate consideration as our shareholders,stockholders, or 60% of the OP’s limited partners approve the merger. In addition, we may not consummate a merger unless the matter is approved by a vote of the OP’s partners, with our interests in the OP voted in proportion to the manner in which our shareholdersstockholders voted to approve the merger. These provisions have the effect of increasing PS’s influence over us due to PS’s ownership of operating partnership units. These provisions may make it more difficult for us to merge with another entity.

The interests of limited partners of our OP may conflict with the interests of our common stockholders.

Limited partners of our OP, including PS, have the right to vote on certain changes to the partnership agreement. They may vote in a way that is against the interests of our shareholders.stockholders. Also, as general partner of our OP, we are required to protect the interests of the limited partners of the OP. The interests of the limited partners and of our shareholdersstockholders may differ.

We depend on external sources of capital to grow our Company.

WeAs a REIT, we are generally required under the Code to annually distribute at least 90% of our “REIT taxable income.”income” (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) to our stockholders each year. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any necessary

13


building and tenant improvements, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we may need to rely on third-party sources of capital to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain the financing on favorable terms or at all. Access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on general market conditions, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and expected future earnings, our cash flow, and the market price per share of our common stock. If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources, we may not be able to acquire properties when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy any debt service obligations, or make cash distributions to shareholders.stockholders.

We are subjectRisks Related to laws and governmental regulations and actions that affect our operating results and financial condition.Our Preferred Stock

Our business is subject to regulation under a wide variety of U.S. federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies including those imposed by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), as well as applicable local, state and national labor laws. Although we have policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws and regulations, failure to comply with the various laws and regulations may result in civil and criminal liability, fines and penalties, increased costs of compliance and restatement of our financial statements and could also affect the marketability of our real estate facilities.

In response to current economic conditions or the current political environment or otherwise, laws and regulations could be implemented or changed in ways that adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, such as legislation that could otherwise increase operating costs. Such changes could also adversely affect the operations of our customers, which could affect the price and demand for our space as well as our customer’s ability to pay their rent.

Holders of depositary shares, each representing 1/1,000 of a share of our outstanding preferred stock, have dividend, liquidation and other rights that are senior to the rights of the holders of shares of our common stock.

Holders of our shares of preferred stock are entitled to cumulative dividends before any dividends may be declared or set aside on our common stock. Upon liquidation, before any payment is made to holders of our common stock, shares of our preferred stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus any accrued and unpaid distributions before any payment is made to the common shareholders.stockholders. These preferences may limit the amount received by our common shareholdersstockholders for ongoing distributions or upon liquidation. In addition, our preferred stockholders have the right to elect two additional directors to our Board whenever dividends are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to six or more quarterly dividends, whether or not consecutive.


19

Future issuances by us


Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market (either by us or by PS), or issuances of shares of common stock in connection with redemptions of common units of our OP, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The Company may seek to engage in common stock offerings in the future. Offerings of common stock, including by us in connection with portfolio or other property acquisitions or by PS in secondary offerings, and the issuance of common units of the OP in exchange for shares of common stock, could have an adverse effect on the market price of the shares of our common stock.

We rely on technology in our operations and failures, inadequacies or interruptions to our service could harm our business.

The execution of our business strategy is heavily dependent on the use of technologies and systems, including the Internet, to access, store, transmit, deliver and manage information and processes. We also maintain personally identifiable information about our customers and employees. Although we believe we have taken commercially reasonable steps to protect the security of our systems, these systemsPreferred Stockholders are subject to damagecertain risks.

Holders of our preferred stock have preference rights over our common stockholders with respect to liquidation and distributions, which give them some assurance of continued payment of their stated dividend rate, and receipt of their principal upon liquidation of the Company or interruption from power outages, computerredemption of their securities. However, holders of our preferred stock should consider the following risks:

The Company has in the past, and telecommunications failures, computer worms, virusescould in the future, issue or assume additional debt. Preferred stockholders would be subordinated to the interest and other destructiveprincipal payments of such debt, which would increase the risk that there would not be sufficient funds to pay distributions or disruptive security breaches, natural disasters, terrorist attacks,liquidation amounts to the preferred stockholders.

The Company has in the past, and other catastrophic events. Disruptionscould in service, system shutdowns and security breaches could impact our operations, subject usthe future, issue additional preferred stock that, while pari passu to legal liabilitythe existing preferred stock, increases the risk that there would not be sufficient funds to pay distributions to the preferred stockholders.

While the Company has no plans to do so, if the Company were to lose its REIT status or government enforcement actions, and otherwiseno longer elect REIT status, it would no longer be required to distribute its taxable income to maintain REIT status. If, in such a circumstance, the Company ceased paying dividends, unpaid distributions to the preferred stockholders would continue to accumulate. The preferred stockholders would have a material adverse effectthe ability to elect two additional members to serve on our business.Board until the arrearage was cured. The preferred stockholders would not receive any compensation (such as interest) for the delay in the receipt of distributions, and it is possible that the arrearage could accumulate indefinitely.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

14


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017,2021, we owned 9897 business parks consisting ofand 666 buildings in a geographically diverse portfolio of 28.027.7 million rentable square feet of commercial real estate which consists of 14.5 million square feet of flex space, 8.819.3 million square feet of industrial space, and 4.75.5 million square feet of industrial-flex space, and 2.9 million square feet of low-rise suburban office space. The weighted average occupancy rate for these assets throughout 20172021 was 93.8%93.7% and the realized rent per square foot was $15.30.$16.53.


20


The following table reflects the geographical diversification of the 9897 business parks owned by the Company as of December 31, 2017,2021, the type of the rentable square footage and the weighted average occupancy rates throughout 20172021 (except as set forth below, all of the properties are held in fee simple interest) simple) (in thousands, except number of business parks):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

Weighted

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

Number of

Average

 

Business

 

Rentable Square Footage

 

Occupancy

Business

Rentable Square Footage

Occupancy

Region

 

Parks

 

Flex

 

Industrial

 

Office

 

Total

 

Rate

Parks

Industrial

Flex

Office

Total

Rate

Northern California

 

29 

 

2,999 

 

3,906 

 

340 

 

7,245 

 

95.9% 

30 

6,391 

593 

340 

7,324 

94.4%

Southern California

 

15 

 

2,540 

 

712 

 

31 

 

3,283 

 

96.4% 

16 

2,989 

582 

31 

3,602 

97.2%

Dallas (1)

 

13 

 

2,850 

 

231 

 

 

3,081 

 

90.7% 

13 

2,242 

793 

3,035 

89.5%

Austin

 

 

1,717 

 

246 

 

 

1,963 

 

94.9% 

755 

1,208 

1,963 

94.5%

Northern Virginia

 

17 

 

1,947 

 

 

1,970 

 

3,917 

 

91.4% 

18 

1,810 

1,242 

1,726 

4,778 

92.4%

South Florida

 

 

1,074 

 

2,780 

 

12 

 

3,866 

 

97.5% 

3,728 

126 

12 

3,866 

97.3%

Seattle

1,052 

270 

28 

1,350 

94.7%

Suburban Maryland

 

 

970 

 

 

1,608 

 

2,578 

 

83.2% 

341 

751 

1,092 

92.1%

Seattle

 

 

411 

 

951 

 

28 

 

1,390 

 

98.1% 

Total

 

95 

 

14,508 

 

8,826 

 

3,989 

 

27,323 

 

93.8% 

96 

19,308 

4,814 

2,888 

27,010 

94.3%

Assets held for sale

 

 

 

 

705 

 

705 

 

92.2% 

702 

702 

70.4%

Total

 

98 

 

14,508 

 

8,826 

 

4,694 

 

28,028 

 

93.8% 

97 

19,308 

5,516 

2,888 

27,712 

93.7%

____________________________

(1)

The Company owns two properties comprised of 232,000 square feet that are subject to ground leases in Las Colinas, Texas. These leases expire in 2019 and 2020, however, we have the option to extend them for another 10 years.

____________________________

(1)The Company owns two properties comprising 231,000 square feet that are subject to ground leases in Irving, Texas. These leases expire in 2029 and 2030.

Along with the 28.027.7 million rentable square feet of commercial space, we also have a 95.0% interest in a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex.complex and a 98.2% interest in a 411-unit multifamily apartment complex development.

We currently anticipate that each of our properties listed will continue to be used for its current purpose. However, we will from time to time evaluate our properties from a highest and best use perspective, and may identify higher and better uses for itsour real estate. We renovate our properties in connection with the re-leasing of space to customers and expect to fund the costs of such renovations generally from rental income.

Competition exists in each of the market areas in which theseour properties are located, and we have risks that customers willcould default on leases and declare bankruptcy. We believe these risks are mitigated in part through the Company’s geographic diversity and our diverse customer base.

Please refer to “Item 7. Management’sItem 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for portfolio information with respect to lease expirations and operating results in 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 20152019 by region and by type of rentable space.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not presently subject to material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, other than routine actions, for negligence and other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance or third party indemnifications and all of which collectively are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

21

15


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ANDISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Price offor the Registrant’s Common Equity:

The common stock of the Company trades on the NYSE under the symbol PSB. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock on the NYSE for the applicable periods:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Range

 

Dividends

 

Three Months Ended

 

High

Low

 

Declared

 

March 31, 2016

 

$

102.52 

$

81.27 

 

$

0.75 

 

June 30, 2016

 

$

106.17 

$

94.88 

 

$

0.75 

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

117.00 

$

104.44 

 

$

0.75 

 

December 31, 2016

 

$

117.35 

$

102.32 

 

$

0.75 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2017

 

$

121.81 

$

108.97 

 

$

0.85 

 

June 30, 2017

 

$

134.49 

$

114.18 

 

$

0.85 

 

September 30, 2017

 

$

137.60 

$

126.94 

 

$

0.85 

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

137.45 

$

122.23 

 

$

0.85 

 

Holders:

As of February 19, 2018,18, 2022, there were 298251 holders of record of the common stock.

Dividends:

Holders of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when and if declared by our Board out of any funds legally available for that purpose. As a REIT, we do not incur U.S. federal corporate income tax if we distribute substantially all ofon our “REIT taxable income” that is fully distributed each year (for this purpose, certain distributions paid in a subsequent year may be considered), and if we meet certain organizational and operation rules.operational requirements. We believe we have met these REIT requirements in all periods presented herein, and we expect to continue to elect and qualify as a REIT.

The Board has established a distribution policy intended to maximize the retention of operating cash flow and distribute the amount required for the Company to maintain its tax status as a REIT.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities:

The Board previouslyhas authorized the repurchase, from time to time, of up to 6.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the three months ended December 31, 2017,2021, there were no shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased. As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company has 1,614,721 shares available for repurchase under the program. The program does not expire. Purchases will be made subject to market conditions and other investment opportunities available to the Company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans:

TheInformation related to the Company’s equity compensation plan information is provided in Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

16


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

The following sets forth selected consolidated financial and operating information on a historical basis of the Company. The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Company included in this Form 10-K.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013



(In thousands, except per share data)

Rental income

$

402,179 

 

$

386,871 

 

$

373,135 

 

$

376,255 

 

$

359,246 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of operations

 

125,340 

 

 

123,108 

 

 

121,224 

 

 

127,371 

 

 

114,831 

Depreciation and amortization

 

94,270 

 

 

99,486 

 

 

105,394 

 

 

110,357 

 

 

108,917 

General and administrative

 

9,679 

 

 

14,862 

 

 

13,582 

 

 

13,639 

 

 

5,312 

Total operating expenses

 

229,289 

 

 

237,456 

 

 

240,200 

 

 

251,367 

 

 

229,060 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

172,890 

 

 

149,415 

 

 

132,935 

 

 

124,888 

 

 

130,186 

Interest and other income

 

942 

 

 

1,233 

 

 

1,130 

 

 

1,032 

 

 

2,124 

Interest and other expenses

 

(1,285)

 

 

(5,664)

 

 

(13,330)

 

 

(13,593)

 

 

(16,166)

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture

 

(805)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

 

1,209 

 

 

 

 

28,235 

 

 

92,373 

 

 

Gain on sale of development rights

 

6,365 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

179,316 

 

 

144,984 

 

 

148,970 

 

 

204,700 

 

 

116,144 

Allocation to noncontrolling interests

 

(24,279)

 

 

(16,955)

 

 

(18,495)

 

 

(30,729)

 

 

(12,952)

Net income allocable to PS Business Parks, Inc.

 

155,037 

 

 

128,029 

 

 

130,475 

 

 

173,971 

 

 

103,192 

Allocation to preferred shareholders based upon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions

 

(52,873)

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

(59,398)

 

 

(60,488)

 

 

(59,216)

Redemptions

 

(10,978)

 

 

(7,312)

 

 

(2,487)

 

 

 

 

Allocation to restricted stock unit holders

 

(761)

 

 

(569)

 

 

(299)

 

 

(329)

 

 

(125)

Net income allocable to common shareholders

$

90,425 

 

$

62,872 

 

$

68,291 

 

$

113,154 

 

$

43,851 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per Common Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Distributions (1)

$

3.40 

 

$

3.00 

 

$

2.20 

 

$

4.75 

 

$

1.76 

Net income — basic

$

3.32 

 

$

2.32 

 

$

2.53 

 

$

4.21 

 

$

1.77 

Net income — diluted

$

3.30 

 

$

2.31 

 

$

2.52 

 

$

4.19 

 

$

1.77 

Weighted average common shares — basic

 

27,207 

 

 

27,089 

 

 

26,973 

 

 

26,899 

 

 

24,732 

Weighted average common shares — diluted

 

27,412 

 

 

27,179 

 

 

27,051 

 

 

27,000 

 

 

24,833 


1722




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013



(In thousands, except per square foot data)

Balance Sheet Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

$

2,100,159 

 

$

2,119,371 

 

$

2,186,658 

 

$

2,227,114 

 

$

2,238,559 

Total debt

$

 

$

 

$

250,000 

 

$

250,000 

 

$

250,000 

Preferred stock called for redemption

$

130,000 

 

$

230,000 

 

$

 

$

 

$

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PS Business Parks, Inc.'s shareholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Preferred stock

$

959,750 

 

$

879,750 

 

$

920,000 

 

$

995,000 

 

$

995,000 

    Common stock

$

733,561 

 

$

733,509 

 

$

740,496 

 

$

718,281 

 

$

722,941 

Noncontrolling interests

$

196,625 

 

$

197,455 

 

$

200,103 

 

$

194,928 

 

$

196,699 

Other Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

271,614 

 

$

250,507 

 

$

238,839 

 

$

228,180 

 

$

222,680 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

$

(80,325)

 

$

(85,008)

 

$

3,131 

 

$

113,188 

 

$

(172,872)

Net cash used in financing activities

$

(205,036)

 

$

(225,782)

 

$

(205,525)

 

$

(220,382)

 

$

(31,210)

Square footage owned at the end of period

 

28,028 

 

 

28,072 

 

 

27,969 

 

 

28,550 

 

 

29,740 

Weighted average occupancy rate (2)

 

93.8% 

 

 

94.0% 

 

 

92.8% 

 

 

91.3% 

 

 

89.9% 

Realized rent per square foot (2) (3)

$

15.30 

 

$

14.61 

 

$

14.27 

 

$

14.00 

 

$

13.91 

____________________________

(1)

Amount includes a $2.75 per common share special cash dividend for the year ended December 31, 2014.

(2)

Weighted average occupancy and rental rates of our total portfolio for each of the last five years, including assets sold and held for sale.

(3)

Excludes material lease buyout payments of $528,000 and $2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013, respectively.

18


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTSOF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the selected financial data and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K.Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP.”) The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. We base these estimates, judgments, and assumptions on historical experience, current trends, and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.

We continually evaluate the estimates, judgments, and assumptions we use to prepare our consolidated financial statements. Changes in estimates, judgments, or assumptions could affect our financial position and our results of operations, which are used by our stockholders, potential investors, industry analysts, and lenders in their evaluation of our performance.

Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates:

Our critical accounting estimates are defined as accounting estimates or assumptions made in accordance with GAAP, which involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty or subjectivity and Estimates:

have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Our significant accounting policies, which utilize these critical accounting estimates, are described in Note 2 – “Summary of significant accounting policies” to theour consolidated financial statements includedunder Item 15 in this annual report on Form 10-K. We believe our mostOur critical accounting policies relate to income tax expense, accounting for acquiredestimates are described below.

Recognition of real estate facilities, allowanceacquired: Generally, our acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate are accounted for doubtful accounts, impairmentas asset acquisitions and not business combinations because substantially all of long-lived assets, accrual for uncertain and contingent liabilities, each of which are more fully discussed below.

Income Tax Expense: We have elected to be treated as a REIT, as defined under the Code. As a REIT, we do not incur federal income tax on our “REIT taxable income” thatfair value is fully distributed each year (for this purpose, certain distributions paidconcentrated in a subsequent year maysingle identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e., land, buildings, and related intangible assets). The accounting model for asset acquisitions requires that the acquisition consideration (including acquisition costs) be considered),allocated to the individual assets acquired and if we meet certain organizationalliabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. Any excess (deficit) of the consideration transferred relative to the sum of the fair value of the assets acquired and operational rules. We believe we have met these REIT requirements for all periods presented herein. Accordingly, we have recorded no federal income tax expense relatedliabilities assumed is allocated to our “REIT taxable income.” 

Our evaluation that we have met the REIT requirements could be incorrect, because compliance with the tax rules requires factual determinations,individual assets and circumstances we have not identified could result in noncompliance with the tax requirements in current or prior years. For any taxable year that we fail to qualify as a REIT and for which applicable statutory relief provisions did not apply, we would be taxed at the regular corporate ratesliabilities based on all of our taxable income for at least that year and the ensuing four years, we could be subject to penalties and interest, and our net income would be materially different from the amounts estimated in our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Acquired Real Estate Facilities:their relative fair values. We estimate the fair valuesvalue of the land, buildings, intangible assets, and intangible liabilities for purposes of allocating the purchase price.

Such estimates, which are determined with the assistance of third-party valuation specialists where appropriate, are based upon many assumptions and judgments, including, (i) but not limited to:

market rates of return and capitalization rates on real estate and intangible assets, (ii) assets;

building and material cost levels, (iii) comparisons of the acquired underlying land parcels to recent land transactions, (iv) levels;

estimated market rent levels and (v) levels;

future revenue growth rates;

future cash flows from the real estate and the existing customer base.base, and

comparisons of the acquired underlying land parcels to recent land transactions.

In calculating value for acquisitions completed during the year ended December 31, 2021, we used discount rates ranging from 5.5% and 6.0% and a capitalization rate of 5.0%. Others could come to materially different conclusions as to the estimated fair values, which wouldcould result in different depreciation and amortization expense, rental income, gains, and losses on sale of real estate assets, and real estate and intangible assets.

AllowanceWe completed acquisitions of two properties for Doubtful Accounts: Customer receivables consist primarilya total purchase price of amounts due$148.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. These transactions were accounted for contractual lease payments, reimbursementsas asset acquisitions, and the purchase price of common area maintenance expenses, property taxeseach was allocated based on the relative fair value of the asset acquired and other expenses recoverable from customers. Deferred rent receivable representsliabilities assumed. Refer to the “Acquisitions” section of Note 3 – “Real estate facilities” to our consolidated financial statements under Item 15 in this annual report on Form 10-K for additional information.


23


Impairment of long-lived assets: For each reporting period, we review current activities and changes in the business conditions of all of our long-lived assets, including our rental properties, construction in progress, land held for development, right-of-use assets related to operating leases in which we are the lessee, and intangibles, to determine the existence of any triggering events or impairment indicators requiring an impairment analysis. If triggering events or impairment indicators are identified, we review an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration.

Upon determination that an impairment has occurred, a write-down is recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its estimated fair value. If an impairment loss is not required to be recognized, the recognition of depreciation or amortization is adjusted prospectively, as necessary, to reduce the carrying amount of the real estate to its estimated disposition value over the remaining period that the cumulative straight-line rental income recordedasset is expected to date exceeds cash rents billedbe held and used. We may also adjust depreciation of properties that are expected to date underbe disposed of or redeveloped prior to the lease agreement. Determinationend of their useful lives.

Impairment of real estate assets classified as held for sale: A property is classified as held for sale when all of the adequacyaccounting criteria for a plan of allowancessale have been met. Upon classification as held for doubtful accounts requiressale, we recognize an impairment charge, if necessary, to lower the carrying amount of the real estate asset to its estimated fair value less cost to sell. The determination of fair value can involve significant judgments and estimates. Others could comeassumptions. We develop key assumptions based on the following available factors: (i) contractual sales price, (ii) preliminary non-binding letters of intent, or (iii) other available comparable market information. If this information is not available, we use estimated replacement costs or estimated cash flow projections that utilize estimated discount and capitalization rates. These estimates are subject to materially different conclusions regardinguncertainty and therefore require significant judgment by us. We review all assets held for sale each reporting period to determine whether the adequacyexisting carrying amounts are fully recoverable in comparison to their estimated fair values less costs to sell. Subsequently, as a result of our allowancequarterly assessment, we may recognize an incremental impairment charge for doubtful accounts. Significant unreserved bad debt losses could materially impact ourany decrease in the asset’s fair value less cost to sell. Conversely, we may recognize a gain for a subsequent increase in fair value less cost to sell, limited to the cumulative net income.loss previously recognized.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:The analysis of impairment of our long-lived assets involves identification of indicators of impairment, projections of future operating cash flows and estimates of fair values or selling prices, all of which require significant judgment and subjectivity. Others could come to materially different conclusions. In addition, we may not have identified all current facts and circumstances that may affect impairment. Any unidentified impairment loss, or change in conclusions, could have a material adverse impact on our net income.

AccrualThe evaluation for Uncertainimpairment and Contingent Liabilities: We accruecalculation of the carrying amount of a long-lived asset to be held and used involves consideration of factors and calculations that are different than the estimate of fair value of assets classified as held for certain contingentsale. Because of these two different models, it is possible for a long-lived asset previously classified as held and other liabilities that have significant uncertain elements, suchused to require the recognition of an impairment charge upon classification as property taxes, performance bonuses and other operating expenses, as well as other legal claims and disputes involving customers, employees, governmental agencies and other third parties. We estimate such liabilities based upon many factors such as assumptions of past and future trends and our evaluation of likely outcomes. However, the estimates of known liabilities could be incorrect or we may not be aware of all such liabilities, in which case our accrued liabilities and net income could be misstated.held for sale.


Strategic Overview

Business Overview

Our overall operating results are impacted

The Company is a fully-integrated, self-advised and self-managed REIT that owns, operates, acquires, and develops commercial properties, primarily by the performancemulti-tenant industrial, industrial-flex and low-rise suburban office space. As of our existing real estate facilities, which at December 31, 2017 are comprised of 28.02021, the Company owned and operated 27.7 million rentable square feet of multi-tenant flex, industrial and office properties concentratedcommercial space in six states consisting of 97 parks and 666 buildings. The Company’s properties are primarily located in major coastal markets that have experienced long-term economic growth. The Company also held a 95.0% interest in a joint venture entity which owns Highgate at The Mile, a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex. Accordingly,complex located in Tysons, Virginia, and a significant degree of management attention is paid98.2% interest in a joint venture formed to maximizingdevelop Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex also located in Tysons, Virginia. Our strong and conservative capital structure allows us the cash flow fromflexibility to use debt and equity capital prudently to fund our existing real estate portfolio. We alsogrowth, which allows us to acquire properties we believe will create long-term value, and fromvalue. From time to time we dispose ofsell properties which no longer fit within the Company’s strategic objectives.

Existing Real Estate Facilities: The operating results of our existing real estate facilities are substantially influenced by demand for rental space within our properties and our markets, which impacts occupancy, rental rates, and capital expendituresexpenditure requirements. We strive to maintain high occupancy levels while increasing rental rates and minimizing capital expenditures when market conditions allow, although the Company may decrease rental rates in markets where conditions require. Management’s initiatives and strategies with respect to our existing real estate facilities, which include incentivizing our personnel to maximize the return on investment for each lease transaction and providingprovide a superior level of service to our customers.

Acquisitions of Real Estate Facilities: We also seek to grow our operationsportfolio through acquisitions of facilities generally consistent with the Company’s focus on owning concentrated business parks with easily configurable space. In the third quarter of 2016,easy to configure space and in markets and product types with favorable long-term return potential.

On November 18, 2021, we acquired twoa multi-tenant office buildings aggregating 226,000industrial business park comprising approximately 141,000 rentable square feet in Rockville, MarylandPlano, Texas, for a total purchase price of $13.3 million.$25.6 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The occupancy rate has increasedpark consists of 5 buildings and was 97.3% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 18.5% on the date1,400 to 25,000 square feet.

On September 1, 2021, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 718,000 rentable square feet in Grapevine, Texas, for a total purchase price of $123.3 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of 15 buildings and was 96.1% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 2,000 to 43.1% as of December 31, 2017. These buildings are located within The Grove 270 (formerly Shady Grove Executive Park) where we already owned three substantially fully-leased buildings aggregating 352,00020,000 square feet.

On October 28, 2020, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 246,000 rentable square feet in Alexandria, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $46.6 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of three buildings and was 100.0% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 7,000 to 75,000 square feet.

On January 10, 2020, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 73,000 rentable square feet in La Mirada, California, for a total purchase price of $13.5 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of five buildings and was 100.0% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 1,200 to 3,000 square feet.

On December 20, 2019, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial-flex business park comprising approximately 79,000 rentable square feet in Santa Clara, California, for a total purchase price of $16.8 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of nine buildings and was 95.6% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 200 to 3,500 square feet.

On September 5, 2019, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 543,000 rentable square feet in Santa Fe Springs, California, for a total purchase price of $104.3 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of ten buildings and was 100.0% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 5,000 to 288,000 square feet.

On April 18, 2019, we acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 74,000 rentable square feet in Signal Hill, California, for a total purchase price of $13.8 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs. The park consists of eight buildings and was 98.4% occupied at acquisition with suites ranging from 1,200 to 8,000 square feet.

25


We continue to seek to acquire additional facilitiesproperties in our existing markets and generally in close proximity to our existing facilities;portfolio; however, there can be no assurance that we will acquire additional facilities that meet our risk-adjusted return and underwriting requirements.

Development or redevelopmentRedevelopment of real estate facilities: We alsoReal Estate Facilities

In certain instances, we may seek to redevelop our existing real estate. We own a large contiguous blockestate or develop new buildings on excess land parcels.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 83,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our 212 Business Park located in Kent, Washington. As of December 31, 2021, $2.2 million of the estimated $15.4 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 17,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our Boca Commerce Park, located in Boca Raton, Florida. As of December 31, 2021, $1.1 million of the estimated $4.0 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022.

During 2021, we completed the development of an 83,000 square foot shallow-bay industrial building on an excess land parcel at our Freeport Business Park located in Irving, Texas for total development costs of $8.1 million. The asset was placed into service on March 1, 2021 and accordingly was reflected under real estate (628,000 rentable square feetfacilities, at cost on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2021.

The Mile is an office and multifamily park we own which sits on 44.5 contiguous acres of land)land located within The Mile in Tysons, Virginia. We demolished oneThe park consists of our existing628,000 square feet of office buildings inspace and a 395-unit multifamily apartment community we developed, Highgate at The Mile, which we completed in 2017 through a joint venture with the JV Partner. In 2019, we successfully rezoned The Mile allowing us to develop, at our election, up to 3,000 additional multifamily units and built Highgateapproximately 500,000 square feet of other commercial uses.

In August 2020, the Company entered into a new joint venture with the JV Partner for the purpose of developing a second multifamily property, Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex. Under the Brentford Joint Venture agreement, the Company has a 98.2% controlling interest and is the managing member with the JV Partner holding the remaining 1.8% limited partnership interest. We contributed the Brentford Parcel at a value of $18.5 million, for which we received equity contribution credit in the Brentford Joint Venture. Our cost basis in the Brentford Parcel was $5.1 million as of December 31, 2021.

Construction of Brentford at The Mile commenced in August 2020 and is anticipated to be completed over a period of 24 to 36 months at an estimated development cost includingof $110 million to $115 million, excluding land cost. As of December 31, 2021, the estimated fair valuedevelopment cost incurred was $54.8 million, which is reflected in land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets along with our $5.1 million cost basis in the Brentford Parcel. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company also recorded non-capitalizable demolition costs of existing land,$0.3 million in interest and other expense on our consolidated statements of $115.6 million.income.


26


While multi-familymultifamily real estate iswas not previously a core asset class for us, we determined that multi-familymultifamily real estate representedrepresents a unique opportunity and the highest and best use of this parcel. Wethe Brentford Parcel. Through joint ventures we have partnered through a joint venture with a local developer and operator of multi-family spacemultifamily properties in order to leverage their development and operational experience. expertise. The scope and timing of the future phases of development of The Mile are subject to a variety of uncertainties, including site plan approvals and building permits.

We consolidate both the joint venture that owns Highgate at The Mile and the joint venture that is developing Brentford at The Mile.

See “Analysis of Items Not Included in OperatingNet Income – Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture”Multifamily” below and Note 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements for more information on Highgate. 

We do not consolidate the joint venture that holds Highgate; accordingly, our share of net loss is reflected under “equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture.” Effective January 1, 2018, the joint venture agreement was amended to provide the Company control of all significant decisions of the joint venutre. As such, we commenced consolidating the operating results of Highgate beginning January 1, 2018.  

We have an additional 123,000 square foot office building located withinat The Mile that we are seeking to demolish in order to construct another multi-family complex on the parcel. This parcel is reflected on our consolidated balance sheets as land and building held for development.Brentford at The scope and timing of development of this site is subject to a variety of contingencies, including approval of entitlement. We do not expect that development will commence any earlier than December 31, 2018.Mile.

DispositionsSale of Real Estate Facilities: In 2015, we completed a plan to exit non-strategic markets in Sacramento California, Oregon and Arizona. We do not expect to exit any additional markets. However, we may from time to time dispose ofsell individual real estate assetsfacilities based on market conditions, fit with our existing portfolio, evaluation of long-term potential returns of markets or product types, or other reasons.

On May 1, 2017,December 30, 2021, we disposed ofsold a two-building single-story office park comprising 44,00053,000 square feet,foot industrial building located in Dallas, Texas,Beltsville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $2.1$4.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $3.2 million.

On December 29, 2021, we sold a 70,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $8.8 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $1.2$6.3 million.

On October 19, 2021, we sold a 371,000 square foot industrial-flex business park located in San Diego, California, for net sale proceeds of $311.1 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $301.3 million.

On September 17, 2021, we sold a 22,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $3.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $2.9 million.

On July 16, 2021, we sold a 244,000 square foot office business park located in Herndon, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $40.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $27.0 million.

On June 17, 2021, we sold a 198,000 square foot office-oriented flex business park located in Chantilly, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $32.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $19.2 million. (Collectively the “2021 Assets Sold”).

During 2021, we reclassified above-mentioned assets as properties held for sale, net, in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020.

On September 16, 2020, we sold two industrial buildings totaling 40,000 square feet located in Redmond, Washington, which were subject to an eminent domain process for net sale proceeds of $11.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $7.7 million.

On January 7, 2020, we completed the sale of a single-tenant building totaling 113,000 square feet in Rockville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $29.3 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $19.6 million. (Collectively the “2020 Assets Sold”).

On October 8, 2019, we sold three business parks located in Rockville and Silver Springs, Maryland: Metro Park North, Meadow Business Park and WesTech Business Park. The parks, consisting of 28 buildings totaling approximately 1.3 million rentable square feet sold for net sale proceeds of $144.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $16.6 million. (Collectively the “2019 Assets Sold”).

We have 705,000702,000 rentable square feet of office productindustrial-flex business park located in Orange County, California,Irving, Texas, held for sale as of December 31, 2021 and expect to complete the sale of these assets during 2018.2022. The operations of thesesuch facilities as well as the sold facilities mentioned above are presented below under “assets sold or held for sale or development.sale.


2027


Certain Factors that May Impact Future Results

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: Starting in March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in cessation, severe curtailment, or impairment of business activities in most sectors of the economy in all markets we operate in, due to governmental “stay at home” orders, risk mitigation procedures, and closure of businesses not considered to be “essential.” Since it remains unknown at this time how long the COVID-19 pandemic will continue, particularly given the impact of existing and potential future variants, we cannot estimate how long these negative economic impacts will persist.

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has entered into rent relief agreements consisting of $6.2 million of rent deferrals and $1.6 million of rent abatements. As of December 31, 2021, the 317 current customers that received rent relief account for 9.5% of rental income. Also as of December 31, 2021, the Company had collected $5.3 million of rent deferral repayment, representing 99.8% of the amounts scheduled to be repaid through December 2021. An additional $0.9 million of rent deferral repayment is scheduled to be repaid thereafter.

The Company also wrote off accounts receivable, net of recoveries and deferred rent receivables of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $1.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020. As of February 18, 2022, the Company had open rent relief requests from approximately less than 1% of customers.

Our ability to re-lease space as leases expire in a way that minimizes vacancy periods and maximizes market rental rates will depend upon market conditions in the specific submarkets in which each of our properties are located. Due to the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the Company’s future ability to grow or maintain existing occupancy levels, possible decreases in rental rates on new and renewal transactions, and the potential negative effect of additional rent deferrals, rent abatements, and customer defaults, we believe in some instances the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have adverse effects on rental income for 2022 and possibly beyond.

Impact of Inflation: Although inflationInflation has not been significant in recent years, ansignificantly increased recently and a continued increase in inflation could adversely impact our future results, and theresults. The Company continues to seek ways to mitigate its potential impact. A substantial portion of the Company’s leases require customers to pay operating expenses, including real estate taxes, utilities, and insurance, as well as increases in common area expenses, which should partially reducingreduce the Company’s exposure to inflation during each lease’s respective lease period.inflation.

Regional Concentration: Our portfolio is concentrated in eight regions, in six states. We have chosen to concentrate in these regions because we believe they have characteristics which enable them to be competitive economically, such as above average population growth, job growth, higher education levels and personal income, which we believe will produce better overall economic returns.income. Changes in economic conditions in these regions in the future could impact our future results.

Industry and Customer Concentrations: We seek to minimize the risk of industry or customer concentrations. As of December 31, 2017,2021, excluding the assets held for sale, only three industry groups thatconcentrations represented more than 10% of our annual rental income comes from business services and warehouse, distribution, transportation and logistics. No other industry group represents more than 10% of our annualized rental income as depicted in the following table.

Percent of

Annualized

Industry

Rental Income

Business services

18.3% 

23.0%

Warehouse, distribution, transportation and logisticsLogistics

11.8% 

14.7%

Health servicesTechnology

9.9% 

10.1%

Computer hardware, software and related services

9.9% 

Government

7.1% 

Retail, food, and automotive

7.1% 

8.6%

EngineeringConstruction and constructionengineering

7.2% 

8.1%

Health services

6.7%

Government

5.2%

Electronics

2.9%

Home furnishings

2.4%

Insurance and financial services

4.0% 

2.0%

ElectronicsAerospace/defense

3.1% 

1.8%

Aerospace/defense products and servicesCommunications

2.8% 

1.6%

Home furnishingsEducation

2.6% 

0.9%

CommunicationsOther

2.0% 

12.0%

Educational servicesTotal

1.6% 

Other

100.0%

12.6% 

Total

100.0% 

28


As of December 31, 2017,2021, excluding the assets held for sale, leases from our top 10 customers comprised 10.6%10.3% of our annualized rental income with only one customer, the U.S. Government (4.5%),four customers representing more than 1% as depicted in the following table (in thousands).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of

Percent of

 

 

Annualized

 

Annualized

Annualized

Annualized

Customers

Square Footage

 

Rental Income (1)

 

Rental Income

Square Footage

Rental Income (1)

Rental Income

U.S. Government

642 

 

$

17,759 

 

4.5% 

465,000 

$

11,989 

2.8%

Keeco, L.L.C.

460 

 

3,639 

 

0.9% 

Amazon Inc.

543,000 

7,071 

1.6%

KZ Kitchen Cabinet & Stone

370,000 

5,604 

1.3%

Luminex Corporation

199,000 

4,419 

1.0%

ECS Federal, LLC

143,000 

3,430 

0.8%

Lockheed Martin Corporation

168 

 

3,505 

 

0.9% 

124,000 

2,724 

0.6%

Kaiser Permanente

158 

 

3,427 

 

0.9% 

Luminex Corporation

162 

 

3,247 

 

0.8% 

KZ Kitchen Cabinet & Stone

192 

 

2,255 

 

0.6% 

CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.

213 

 

2,142 

 

0.5% 

Applied Materials, Inc.

162 

 

2,086 

 

0.5% 

173,000 

2,689 

0.6%

Inova Health Care Services

66 

 

1,913 

 

0.5% 

Investorplace Media, LLC

46 

 

 

1,859 

 

0.5% 

CentralColo, LLC

96,000 

2,495 

0.6%

Great Way Trading & Transportation, Inc.

177,000 

2,126 

0.5%

Costco-Innovel Solutions LLC

180,000 

2,013 

0.5%

Total

2,269 

 

$

41,832 

 

10.6% 

2,470,000 

$

44,560 

10.3%

____________________________

(1)

For leases expiring prior to December 31, 2018, annualized rental income represents income to be received under existing leases from January 1, 2018 through the date of expiration.

____________________________

21(1)For leases expiring prior to December 31, 2021, annualized rental income represents income to be received under existing leases from January 1, 2021 through the date of expiration.


Customer credit risk: WeHistorically, we have historically experienced a low level of write-offs of uncollectible rents, with less than 0.5%0.4% of rental income written off eachin any single year overfrom 2011-2019. As of December 31, 2021, our level of write-offs of uncollectible rents were 0.0%, which were below the last six years. However, there can be no assurance that write offs may not increase, because there is inherent uncertainty in a customer’s ability to continue paying rent and meet its full lease obligation. 0.4% of rental income written off as of December 31, 2020.

As of February 19, 2018,18, 2022, we had 62,00025,000 square feet of leased space occupied by three customersone customer that areis protected by Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.Code, which has no remaining lease value as the lease obligation ended during February 2022. From time to time, customers contact us, requesting early termination of their lease, reductions in space leased, or rent deferment or abatement.rent abatement, which we are not obligated to grant but will consider and grant under certain circumstances.

Net Operating Income

We evaluate the performance of our business parks primarily based onutilize net operating income (“NOI”), a measure that is not defined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), because we believe NOI is an important measure ofGAAP, to evaluate the value andoperating performance of our real estate. We believe investors utilize NOI in a similar manner and for similar reasons. We define NOI as Adjusted Rental Incomerental income less Adjusted Cost of Operations (described below). NOI excludes depreciation and amortization because management and investors do not consider it important in valuing real estate or evaluating real estate performance, because depreciation assumes the value of real estate declines ratably from its historical cost based upon the passage of time, while we believe the value of real estate changes based upon cash flow and other market factors.

Adjusted Rental Income represents rental income, excluding material lease buyout payments, which we believe are not reflective of ongoing rental income.

Operations. Adjusted Cost of Operations, a non-GAAP measure, represents cost of operations, excluding Senior Management Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“LTEIP”) amortization,stock compensation, which can vary significantly period to period based upon-theupon the performance of the whole company, rather than just property operations.Company.

We believe NOI assists investors in analyzing the performance of our real estate by excluding (i) corporate overhead (i.e., general and administrative expense) because it does not relate to the direct operating performance of our real estate, (ii) depreciation and amortization expense because it does not accurately reflect changes in the fair value of our real estate, and (iii) stock compensation expense because this expense item can vary significantly from period to period and thus impact comparability across periods. The Company’s calculation of NOI Adjusted Rental Income and Adjusted Cost of Operations may not be comparable to those of other companies and should not be used as an alternative to performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs. NOI should not be used as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.

We also report NOI on a basis which excludes non-cash rents that have been deferred or abated during the period, certain non-cash revenue items, including amortization of deferred rent receivable, in-place lease intangible, tenant improvement reimbursements, and lease incentives, and also excludes stock-compensation expense for employees whose compensation expense is recorded in cost of operations (“Cash NOI”). We utilize Cash NOI to evaluate the cash flow performance of our properties and believe investors and analysts utilize this metric for the same purpose. Cash NOI should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs. Cash NOI should not be used as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.

See “Analysis of operatingnet income” below for reconciliations of each of these measures to their closest analogous GAAP measure onfrom our consolidated statements of income. Adjusted Rental Income is reconciled to rental income, Adjusted Cost


29


Results of Operations

Operating Results for 20172021 and 20162020

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, net income allocable to common shareholdersstockholders was $90.4$393.1 million or $3.30$14.22 per diluted share, compared to $62.9$124.6 million or $2.31$4.52 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2016.  2020. The increase was mainly due to a $12.9$332.6 million increase in NOI with respect to our real estate facilities, gainshigher gain on the sale of real estate facilities sold in 2021 than in 2020, an $18.3 million increase in NOI from our Same Park portfolio (defined below), a $6.7 million increase in NOI from our Non-Same Park portfolio (defined below), and development rights, a reduction in$1.6 million lower preferred distributions and a reduction in interest expense2021 compared to 2020 due to the repayment of debt, partially offset by an increase in charges related to the redemption of preferred securities. The increasestock in November 2021, partially offset by a decrease of $5.9 million in NOI includes a $14.5 million increase for our Same-Park facilities (defined below) due primarily to higher realized rent per occupied square foot and increased occupancy, offset partially by reduced NOI with respect to facilities wegenerated from assets sold or are holdingheld for sale, or development.$6.4 million non-cash charge related to the above mentioned 2021 redemption of preferred stock, and $3.6 million charge for a state income tax provision due to differences between state and federal tax codes.

Operating Results for 20162020 and 20152019

For the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, net income allocable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2016stockholders was $62.9$124.6 million or $2.31$4.52 per diluted share, compared to $68.3$108.7 million or $2.52$3.95 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2015.  2019. The decrease increase was primarily due to an $11.0 million non-cash charge related to the redemption of preferred stock incurred in 2019 that did not reoccur in 2020, $10.6 million higher gain on sale of assets reportedreal estate facilities sold in 20152020 than in 2019, $6.2 million lower preferred distributions in 2020 compared to 2019, and an increase of $3.9 million in NOI from our Non-Same Park portfolio, partially offset by an $11.9a decrease of $15.1 million increase in NOI with respect to our real estate facilities and lower interest expense in 2016. The increase in NOI includes a $13.0 million increase for our Same-Park facilities due primarily to an increase in occupancy and higher realized rent per occupied square foot, offset partially by reduced NOI with respect to facilities wegenerated from assets sold or are holdingheld for sale or development.sale.

We analyze our net income in this discussion analysis in two main sections: operating income and all other components of net income.

22


Analysis of Operating Income


30


Analysis of Net Income

Our operatingnet income is comprised primarily of our real estate operations, depreciation and amortization expense, and general and administrative expenses.expense, interest and other income, interest and other expenses and gain on sale of real estate facilities.

We segregate our real estate activities into (a)(i) same park operations, representing all operating properties acquired prior to January 1, 2015,2019, comprising 27.125.1 million rentable square feet of our 28.027.7 million inof rentable spacesquare feet at December 31, 20172021 (the “Same Park” facilities)portfolio), (b)(ii) non-same park operations, representing those facilities we own that were acquired after January 1, 20152019 (the “Non-Same Park” facilities)portfolio), (iii) multifamily operations, and (c)(iv) assets sold or held for sale or development, representing facilities whose existing operations are no longer partcomprising 0.7 million square feet of our ongoing operations, because they wereassets held for sale (“AHFS”), the 2021 Assets Sold totaling 1.0 million square feet, the 2020 Assets sold or are expected to be sold or developed or converted to alternate use.  totaling 153,000 square feet, and the 2019 Assets Sold totaling 1.3 million square feet.

The table below sets forth the various components of our operatingnet income (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Years

 

 

 

 

For the Years

 

 

 



Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

Variance

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

Variance

RENTAL INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted rental income (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same Park

$

386,133 

 

$

369,000 

 

$

17,133 

 

$

369,000 

 

$

353,804 

 

$

15,196 

Non-Same Park

 

1,495 

 

 

296 

 

 

1,199 

 

 

296 

 

 

 

 

296 

Assets sold or held for sale or development (2)

 

14,551 

 

 

17,047 

 

 

(2,496)

 

 

17,047 

 

 

19,331 

 

 

(2,284)

Lease buyout payment

 

 

 

528 

 

 

(528)

 

 

528 

 

 

 

 

528 

Total rental income

 

402,179 

 

 

386,871 

 

 

15,308 

 

 

386,871 

 

 

373,135 

 

 

13,736 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COST OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted cost of operations (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same Park

 

115,574 

 

 

112,929 

 

 

2,645 

 

 

112,929 

 

 

110,776 

 

 

2,153 

Non-Same Park

 

1,373 

 

 

289 

 

 

1,084 

 

 

289 

 

 

 

 

289 

Assets sold or held for sale or development (2)

 

6,062 

 

 

6,887 

 

 

(825)

 

 

6,887 

 

 

7,978 

 

 

(1,091)

LTEIP amortization

 

2,331 

 

 

3,003 

 

 

(672)

 

 

3,003 

 

 

2,470 

 

 

533 

Total cost of operations

 

125,340 

 

 

123,108 

 

 

2,232 

 

 

123,108 

 

 

121,224 

 

 

1,884 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same Park

 

270,559 

 

 

256,071 

 

 

14,488 

 

 

256,071 

 

 

243,028 

 

 

13,043 

Non-Same Park

 

122 

 

 

 

 

115 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets sold or held for sale or development (2)

 

8,489 

 

 

10,160 

 

 

(1,671)

 

 

10,160 

 

 

11,353 

 

 

(1,193)

Lease buyout payment and LTEIP amortization

 

(2,331)

 

 

(2,475)

 

 

144 

 

 

(2,475)

 

 

(2,470)

 

 

(5)

Depreciation and amortization

 

(94,270)

 

 

(99,486)

 

 

5,216 

 

 

(99,486)

 

 

(105,394)

 

 

5,908 

General and administrative

 

(9,679)

 

 

(14,862)

 

 

5,183 

 

 

(14,862)

 

 

(13,582)

 

 

(1,280)

Operating income

$

172,890 

 

$

149,415 

 

$

23,475 

 

$

149,415 

 

$

132,935 

 

$

16,480 

For the Years

For the Years

Ended December 31,

Ended December 31,

2021

2020

Variance

2020

2019

Variance

Rental income

Same Park

$

392,221 

$

369,448 

$

22,773 

$

369,448 

$

366,130 

$

3,318 

Non-Same Park

17,829 

9,311 

8,518 

9,311 

2,566 

6,745 

Multifamily

9,069 

9,464 

(395)

9,464 

10,075 

(611)

Assets sold or held for sale (1)

19,584 

27,400 

(7,816)

27,400 

51,075 

(23,675)

Total rental income

438,703 

415,623 

23,080 

415,623 

429,846 

(14,223)

Cost of operations

Adjusted Cost of Operations (2)

Same Park

111,333 

106,860 

4,473 

106,860 

104,152 

2,708 

Non-Same Park

5,523 

3,661 

1,862 

3,661 

857 

2,804 

Multifamily

4,647 

4,264 

383 

4,264 

4,137 

127 

Assets sold or held for sale (1)

7,636 

9,518 

(1,882)

9,518 

18,063 

(8,545)

Stock compensation expense (3)

1,757 

1,210 

547 

1,210 

1,134 

76 

Total cost of operations

130,896 

125,513 

5,383 

125,513 

128,343 

(2,830)

NOI (4)

Same Park

280,888 

262,588 

18,300 

262,588 

261,978 

610 

Non-Same Park

12,306 

5,650 

6,656 

5,650 

1,709 

3,941 

Multifamily

4,422 

5,200 

(778)

5,200 

5,938 

(738)

Assets sold or held for sale (1)

11,948 

17,882 

(5,934)

17,882 

33,012 

(15,130)

Stock compensation expense (3)

(1,757)

(1,210)

(547)

(1,210)

(1,134)

(76)

Depreciation and amortization expense

(93,486)

(96,314)

2,828 

(96,314)

(104,249)

7,935 

General and administrative expense

(19,057)

(14,526)

(4,531)

(14,526)

(13,761)

(765)

Interest and other income

2,536 

1,234 

1,302 

1,234 

4,492 

(3,258)

Interest and other expense

(4,646)

(1,072)

(3,574)

(1,072)

(657)

(415)

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

359,875 

27,273 

332,602 

27,273 

16,644 

10,629 

Net income

$

553,029 

$

206,705 

$

346,324 

$

206,705 

$

203,972 

$

2,733 

____________________________

____________________________

(1)As of December 31, 2021, the Company had reclassified AHFS totaling 0.7 million square feet to Assets sold or held for sale. Also included in the respective periods in 2021 are the 2021 Assets Sold totaling 1.0 million square feet. As of December 31, 2020, Assets sold or held for sale includes the 0.7 million square feet of AHFS, along with the 2021 Assets Sold, and the 2020 Assets sold totaling 153,000 square feet. As of December 31, 2019, Assets sold or held for sale includes the 0.7 million square feet of AHFS, along with the 2021 Assets Sold, the 2020 Assets sold, and the 2019 Assets Sold totaling 1.3 million square feet.

(2)Adjusted Cost of Operations excludes the impact of stock compensation expense.

(3)Stock compensation expense, as shown here, represents stock compensation expense for employees whose compensation expense is recorded in cost of operations. Note that stock compensation expense attributable to our executive management team (including divisional vice presidents) and other corporate employees is recorded within general and administrative expense.

(4)NOI represents rental income less Adjusted Cost of Operations.


(1)

Adjusted rental income excludes material lease buyout payments.

(2)

The operations for “assets sold or held for sale or development” is primarily comprised of the historical operations of the 705,000 rentable square feet of office product held for sale and are therefore not expected to remain part of our ongoing operations. These assets were removed from the Same Park portfolio in the current year’s presentation. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, “assets sold or held for sale or development” also includes $3.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively in adjusted rental income and $905,000 and $702,000 in adjusted cost of operations from a 123,000 square foot office building held for development. For the year ended December 31, 2015, “assets sold or held for sale or development” includes $2.7 million in adjusted rental income and $1.2 million in adjusted cost of operations from 574,000 square feet of assets sold during 2015.

31


(3)

Adjusted cost of operations excludes the impact of LTEIP amortization.

(4)

Net operating income represents adjusted rental income less adjusted cost of operations.

Rental income increased $15.3$23.1 million in 20172021 compared to 20162020 and by $13.7decreased $14.2 million in 2016 as2020 compared to 20152019. The increase in 2021 was due primarily to increaseshigher occupancy, a reduction in adjustedrent abatements granted to certain customers in 2021 compared to 2020, lower write-offs of accounts receivable and deferred rent receivable in 2021 compared to 2020, combined with rental income atfrom our Non-Same Park portfolio acquired during the fourth quarter of 2020 and 2021. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in rental income from assets sold. The decrease in 2020 was due primarily to reduced rental income from assets sold, partially offset by an increase in rental income from our Non-Same Park and Same Park portfolio.

Cost of operations increased $5.4 million in 2021 compared to 2020 and decreased $2.8 million in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase in 2021 was due primarily to higher Adjusted Cost of Operations incurred by our Same Park (discussed below) and Non-Same Park portfolios, partially offset by a decrease in Adjusted Cost of Operations from assets sold. The decrease in 2020 was due primarily to reduced operating expenses from assets sold, partially offset by higher Adjusted Cost of Operations incurred by our Same Park and Non-Same Park facilities, offset partially by adjusted rentalportfolios.

Net income from assets sold or held for sale or development.  The increasesincreased $346.3 million in adjusted rental income at the Same Park facilities in 2017 and 2016 were due primarily2021 compared to higher annualized realized rental income per occupied square foot2020 and increased occupancy.

23


Cost of operations increased $2.2$2.7 million in 20172020 compared to 2016 and by $1.9 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 due primarily to increases in adjusted cost of operations for the Same Park and Non-Same Park facilities, offset partially by adjusted costs of operations from assets sold or held for sale or development.2019. The 2017 increase in cost of operations 2021 was partially offset by lower LTEIP amortization, whereas the increase in 2016 LTEIP amortization increased 2016 cost of operations.

Operating income increased $23.5 million in 2017 compared to 2016 and by $16.5 million in 2016 compare to 2015. The 2017 increase was due primarily to higher rental income, lower depreciation expense and general and administrative expenses. The 2016 increase in operating income was primarilymainly due to higher rental income and lower depreciation expensegain on sale of real estate facilities sold in 2021 than 2020 combined with higher NOI, partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses.

See below for a discussionexpense in 2021 than 2020 and higher other expenses in 2021 compared to 2020. The increase in 2020 was mainly due to higher gain on sale of real estate facilities sold in 2020 than 2019 combined with lower depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by lower NOI and generallower interest and administrative expenses.other income.


32


Same Park FacilitiesPortfolio

The Same Park facilities are those that we have owned and operated since January 1, 2015. We evaluate the operations of these facilities to more effectively evaluate the ongoing performance of our portfolio in 2017, 2016 and 2015. We believe that evaluation of the Same Park information is used byportfolio provides an informative view of how the Company’s portfolio has performed over comparable periods. We believe that investors and analysts use Same Park information in a similarcomparable manner.

The following table summarizes the historical operating results of these facilitiesour Same Park portfolio and certain statistical information related to leasing activity in 2021, 2020, and 2019 (in thousands, except per square foot data):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of Same Park Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years

 

 

 

For the Years

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

Variance

 

2016

 

2015

 

Variance

For the Years

For the Years

Adjusted rental income

$

386,133 

 

$

369,000 

 

4.6% 

 

$

369,000 

 

$

353,804 

 

4.3% 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

Ended December 31,

Adjusted cost of operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

2020

% Change

2020

2019

% Change

Rental income

Cash Rental Income (1)

$

391,125 

$

365,881 

6.9%

$

365,881 

$

363,104 

0.8%

Non-Cash Rental Income (2)

1,096 

3,567 

(69.3%)

3,567 

3,026 

17.9%

Total rental income

392,221 

369,448 

6.2%

369,448 

366,130 

0.9%

Adjusted Cost of Operations (3)

Property taxes

 

39,512 

 

 

38,450 

 

2.8% 

 

 

38,450 

 

 

36,587 

 

5.1% 

41,958 

41,184 

1.9%

41,184 

38,873 

5.9%

Utilities

 

21,987 

 

 

22,077 

 

(0.4%)

 

 

22,077 

 

 

21,935 

 

0.6% 

18,066 

17,170 

5.2%

17,170 

17,920 

(4.2%)

Repairs and maintenance

 

25,949 

 

 

23,520 

 

10.3% 

 

 

23,520 

 

 

23,065 

 

2.0% 

23,064 

22,697 

1.6%

22,697 

21,711 

4.5%

Compensation

16,082 

15,522 

3.6%

15,522 

14,708 

5.5%

Snow removal

 

544 

 

 

1,810 

 

(69.9%)

 

 

1,810 

 

 

1,938 

 

(6.6%)

1,021 

233 

338.2%

233 

1,033 

(77.4%)

Property insurance

4,778 

3,943 

21.2%

3,943 

3,269 

20.6%

Other expenses

 

27,582 

 

 

27,072 

 

1.9% 

 

 

27,072 

 

 

27,251 

 

(0.7%)

6,364 

6,111 

4.1%

6,111 

6,638 

(7.9%)

Total

 

115,574 

 

 

112,929 

 

2.3% 

 

 

112,929 

 

 

110,776 

 

1.9% 

Total Adjusted Cost of Operations

111,333 

106,860 

4.2%

106,860 

104,152 

2.6%

NOI (4)

$

280,888 

$

262,588 

7.0%

$

262,588 

$

261,978 

0.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

$

270,559 

 

$

256,071 

 

5.7% 

 

$

256,071 

 

$

243,028 

 

5.4% 

Cash NOI (5)

$

279,792 

$

259,021 

8.0%

$

259,021 

$

258,952 

0.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Statistical Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin (1)

 

70.1% 

 

 

69.4% 

 

1.0% 

 

 

69.4% 

 

 

68.7% 

 

1.0% 

Rentable square footage at period end

25,053 

25,053 

25,053 

25,053 

NOI margin (6)

71.6%

71.1%

0.5%

71.1%

71.6%

-0.5%

Cash NOI margin (7)

71.5%

70.8%

0.7%

70.8%

71.3%

-0.5%

Weighted average square foot occupancy

 

94.4% 

 

 

94.2% 

 

0.2% 

 

 

94.2% 

 

 

93.0% 

 

1.3% 

94.4%

92.7%

1.7%

92.7%

94.4%

-1.7%

Annualized realized rent per occupied square foot (2)

$

15.10 

 

$

14.45 

 

4.5% 

 

$

14.45 

 

$

14.04 

 

2.9% 

Revenue per Occupied Square Foot (8)

$

16.58 

$

15.91 

4.2%

$

15.91 

$

15.48 

2.8%

Revenue per Available Foot (RevPAF) (9)

$

15.66 

$

14.75 

6.2%

$

14.75 

$

14.62 

0.9%

Cash Rental Income per Occupied

Square Foot (10)

$

16.53 

$

15.76 

4.9%

$

15.76 

$

15.35 

2.7%

Cash Rental Income per Available Foot (11)

$

15.61 

$

14.60 

6.9%

$

14.60 

$

14.49 

0.8%

____________________________

(1)Cash Rental Income represents rental income excluding Non-Cash Rental Income (defined below). See table below for the change in Cash Rental Income

(2)Non-Cash Rental Income represents amortization of deferred rent receivable (net of write-offs), in-place lease intangible, tenant improvement reimbursements, and lease incentives. Same Park Non-Cash Rental Income is presented net of deferred rent receivable write-offs of $0.3 million, $3.0 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

(3)Adjusted Cost of Operations, as presented above, excludes stock compensation expense for employees whose compensation expense is recorded in costs of operations

(4)NOI represents rental income less Adjusted Cost of Operations.

(5)Cash NOI represents Cash Rental Income less Adjusted Cost of Operations.

(6)NOI margin is computed by dividing NOI by rental income.

(7)Cash NOI margin is computed by dividing Cash NOI by Cash Rental Income.

(8)Revenue per Occupied Square Foot is computed by dividing rental income for the period by weighted average occupied square feet for the same period.

(9)Revenue per Available Square Foot (RevPAF) is computed by dividing rental income for the period by weighted average available square feet for the same period.

(10)Cash Rental Income per Occupied Square Foot is computed by dividing Cash Rental Income for the period by weighted average occupied square feet for the same period.

(11)Cash Rental Income per Available Square Foot is computed by dividing Cash Rental Income for the period by weighted average available square feet for the same period.

(1)

Computed by dividing NOI by adjusted rental income. 

(2)

Represents the annualized adjusted rental income earned per occupied square foot.

33


Table of Contents

Analysis of Same Park Adjusted Rental Income

Adjusted rentalRental income generated by thefor our Same Park facilitiesportfolio increased 4.6%6.2% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and by 4.3%0.9% in 2016 as2020 compared to 2015. These increases were2019. The increase in 2021 was due primarily to higher rental rates charged to our customers, as annualized realized rental incomerevenue per occupied square foot increased 4.5% and 2.9% in 2017 and 2016, respectively, compared to the year prior. Weighted4.2%, weighted average occupancy increased 0.2%1.7% in 2021, and 1.3%lower rent deferrals and rent abatements granted in 20172021, combined with lower write-offs of accounts receivable and 2016, respectively, compareddeferred rent receivable in 2021. The increase in 2020 was due primarily to the year prior.

We believe that high occupancies help maximize ourhigher rental income. Accordingly, we seekrates charged to maintaincustomers, as revenue per occupied square foot increased 2.8%, partially offset by a 1.7% decrease in weighted average occupancy over 90%.in 2020 compared to 2019, rent deferrals and rent abatements granted in 2020, and higher write-offs of accounts receivable and deferred rent receivable in 2020.

During 2017 and 2016, most markets continued to reflect favorable conditions allowing for stable occupancy as well as increasingThe following table details Same Park rental rates. With the exception of Northern Virginia and Suburban Maryland markets, new rental ratesincome for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

For the Years

For the Years

Ended December 31,

Ended December 31,

2021

2020

Change

2020

2019

Change

Rental income (1)

Base rental income

$

291,169 

$

280,499 

$

10,670 

$

280,499 

$

275,563 

$

4,936 

Expense recovery income

96,248 

88,534 

7,714 

88,534 

85,948 

2,586 

Lease buyout income

1,856 

1,044 

812 

1,044 

1,364 

(320)

Rent receivable recovery/

(write-off)

(12)

(1,515)

1,503 

(1,515)

(1,016)

(499)

Abatements

(312)

(1,285)

973 

(1,285)

(1,285)

Deferrals

(292)

(5,253)

4,961 

(5,253)

(5,253)

Deferral repayments, net

1,773 

2,953 

(1,180)

2,953 

2,953 

Fee Income

695 

904 

(209)

904 

1,245 

(341)

Non-Cash Rental Income (2)

1,096 

3,567 

(2,471)

3,567 

3,026 

541 

Total rental income

$

392,221 

$

369,448 

$

22,773 

$

369,448 

$

366,130 

$

3,318 

____________________________

(1)For all periods presented, the Company improved over expiringreclassified AHFS totaling 0.7 million square feet to assets sold or held for sale and were excluded from reported Same Park operating metrics.

(2)Non-cash rental rates on executed leases as economic conditionsincome includes amortization of deferred rent receivable (net of write-offs), in-place lease intangible, tenant improvement reimbursements, and tenant demand remained healthy.lease incentives.

24


Table of Contents

OurWe expect our future revenue growth will come primarily from contractual rental increases as well as from potential increases in market rents allowingwhich would allow us to increase rent levels when leases are either renewed with existing customers or re-leased to new customers. The following table sets forth the expirations of existing leases in our Same Park portfolio in placeover the next ten years based on lease data at December 31, 2017 over the next 10 years 2021 (dollars and square feet in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of

Percent of

 

 

 

Rentable Square

 

Percent of

 

Annualized Rental

 

Annualized Rental

Rentable Square

Percent of

Annualized Rental

Annualized Rental

 

Number of

 

Footage Subject to

 

Total Leased

 

Income Under

 

Income Represented

Number of

Footage Subject to

Total Leased

Income Under

Income Represented

Year of Lease Expiration

 

Customers

 

Expiring Leases

 

Square Footage

 

Expiring Leases

 

by Expiring Leases

Customers

Expiring Leases

Square Footage

Expiring Leases

by Expiring Leases

2018

 

 

1,847 

 

 

5,998 

 

23.1% 

 

$

97,358 

 

 

23.6% 

2019

 

 

1,519 

 

 

6,740 

 

26.0% 

 

 

101,830 

 

 

24.7% 

2020

 

 

787 

 

 

5,087 

 

19.6% 

 

 

75,766 

 

 

18.3% 

2021

 

 

292 

 

 

2,434 

 

9.4% 

 

 

37,806 

 

 

9.2% 

2022

 

 

279 

 

 

2,713 

 

10.4% 

 

 

45,317 

 

 

11.0% 

1,961 

5,527 

22.8%

$

96,033 

22.2%

2023

 

 

48 

 

 

1,210 

 

4.7% 

 

 

19,065 

 

 

4.6% 

1,314 

5,749 

23.8%

98,774 

22.8%

2024

 

 

33 

 

 

669 

 

2.6% 

 

 

11,267 

 

 

2.7% 

762 

4,635 

19.1%

83,220 

19.2%

2025

 

 

23 

 

 

571 

 

2.2% 

 

 

12,517 

 

 

3.0% 

277 

3,220 

13.3%

59,538 

13.8%

2026

 

 

14 

 

 

106 

 

0.4% 

 

 

2,580 

 

 

0.6% 

204 

2,313 

9.6%

42,195 

9.8%

2027

 

 

 

 

20 

 

0.1% 

 

 

889 

 

 

0.2% 

40 

1,155 

4.8%

20,877 

4.8%

2028

27 

565 

2.3%

9,935 

2.3%

2029

13 

337 

1.4%

8,032 

1.9%

2030

14 

567 

2.3%

10,104 

2.3%

2031

38 

0.2%

1,156 

0.3%

Thereafter

 

 

11 

 

 

399 

 

1.5% 

 

 

8,822 

 

 

2.1% 

108 

0.4%

2,746 

0.6%

Total

 

 

4,859 

 

 

25,947 

 

100.0% 

 

$

413,217 

 

 

100.0% 

4,624 

24,214 

100.0%

$

432,610 

100.0%

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we leased 7.4 million in rentable square feet to new and existing customers, with an average increase in rental rates over the previous rates of 5.1%.  Renewals of leases with existing customers represented 62.0% of our leasing activity for the year ended December 31, 2017. See “Analysis of Same Park Market Trends” below for further analysis of such data on a by-marketby market basis.


34

Our ability to re-lease space on expired leases in a way that minimizes vacancy periods and the lease rates that may be achieved are not predictable, because they will depend upon market conditions in the specific submarkets in which each


Table of our properties are located.Contents

Analysis of Same Park Adjusted Cost of Operations

Adjusted costsCost of operations generated by theOperations for our Same Park facilitiesportfolio increased 2.3%4.2% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 due primarily to higher utility costs, higher property insurance, higher snow removal costs, higher property taxes, and higher payroll costs. Adjusted Costs of Operations increased other expenses,2.6% in 2020 compared to 2019 due primarily to higher property taxes, higher repairs and maintenance, expense (excludinghigher payroll costs, and higher insurance costs, partially offset by lower utility costs and savings from snow removal costs) and property taxes offset partially by reduced snow removal costs. Adjusted costs of operations increased by 1.9% in 2016 as compared to 2015 due primarily to increased repairs and maintenance expense (excluding snow removal costs) and property tax expense offset partially by other expenses.

Property taxes increased 2.8%1.9% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and by 5.1%5.9% in 2016 as2020 compared to 20152019 due primarily to higher assessed values. We expect potential property tax growth in 2018the future due primarily to higher assessed values and changes in tax rates.values.

Utilities are dependent primarily upon energy prices and usage levels. Changes in usage levels are driven primarily by weather and temperature. Utilities decreased 0.4%increased 5.2% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and increased 0.6%decreased 4.2% in 2016 as2020 compared to 2015.2019. The increase in 2021 were driven by reduced consumption in 2020 resulting from the “shelter in place order” due to the COVID-19 pandemic during the second and third quarter of 2020. The decrease in 2020 was due primarily to a rate reduction related to adopting a renewable energy program during the year as well as reduced water and electricity usage due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to estimate future utility costs because weather, temperature and energy prices are volatile and not readily predictable. However, based upon current trends and expectations regarding commercial electricity rates, we expect inflationary increasesutility costs in rates in 2018.the future to be higher than our results for year ended December 31, 2021 due to increased traffic and use at our parks as our customers resume operations.

Repairs and maintenance increased 4.6%1.6% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and 4.5% in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase in 2021 was primarily due to incrementalincreased property services combined with higher landscaping repairs and security costs, relatingas well as reduced consumption in 2020 resulting from the “shelter in place order” due to Hurricane Irmathe COVID-19 pandemic during the second and third quarter of 2020. The increase in 2020 was primarily due to increased property services combined with higher landscaping repairs and security costs incurred partially offset by 9.8%a reduction in 2016 as compared to 2015. Repairsgeneral repairs and maintenance costs are dependent upon many factors including weather conditions, which can impact repair and maintenance needs, inflation in material and labor costs and random events, andprojects as a result are not readily predictable. Weof the COVID-19 pandemic. However, we expect inflationary increases to repairs and maintenance costs in 2018, excluding snow removalthe future to be higher than our results for the year ended December 31, 2021 as a result of increased traffic and use at our parks as customers resume normalized operations.

Payroll expense which isincreased 3.6% in 2021 compared to 2020 and 5.5% in 2020 compared to 2019. Payroll expense includes on site and supervisory personnel costs incurred in the operation of our properties. The increases in payroll was primarily weather dependentdue to salary increases and not predictable.promotions. We expect payroll expenses to continue to increase in the future.

Snow removal decreased 69.9%increased 338.2% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and by 6.6%decreased 77.4% in 2016 as2020 compared to 2015.2019. Snow removal costs are weather dependent and therefore not predictable.

Property insurance expense increased 21.2% in 2021 compared to 2020 and 20.6% in 2020 compared to 2019 due to a 20% rate increase for the policy period June 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022 due to unfavorable market conditions pervasive throughout commercial real estate sectors combined with insurance deductibles recorded during 2021 related to damage from the winter storm in Texas. The increase in property insurance expense in 2020 compared to 2019 was also primarily due to an increase in our property insurance premiums for the policy period June 2020 to May 2021. We expect to experience increases in property insurance expense in the future as unfavorable market conditions pervasive throughout commercial real estate sectors persist.

Other expenses increased 7.0%4.1% in 2017 as2021 compared to 20162020 and decreased 7.3%7.9% in 2016 as2020 compared to 2015. These costs2019. Other expenses are comprised of on site and supervisory personnel,general property insurance and other expenses incurred in the operation of our properties. The increase in 2021 was primarily due to certain office related expenses and professional services. The decrease in 2020 was primarily due to higher than average professional fees related to ordinary course tenant related matters incurred in 2019, which did not recur in 2020. We expect other expenses to increase on an inflationary basis in 2018.be comparable to our results for the year ended December 31, 2021.


2535


Table of Contents

Same Park Quarterly Trends

The following table sets forth historical quarterly trends indata related to the operations of theour Same Park facilitiesportfolio for adjusted rental income, adjusted costCash Rental Income, Adjusted Cost of Operations, weighted average occupancy, Cash Rental Income per Occupied Square Foot, and Cash Rental Income per Available Square Foot (in thousands, except per square foot data):

For the Three Months Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

Full Year

Cash Rental income (1)

2021

$

95,010 

$

96,948 

$

99,161 

$

100,006 

$

391,125 

2020

$

93,109 

$

86,705 

$

91,501 

$

94,566 

$

365,881 

2019

$

89,301 

$

90,723 

$

90,189 

$

92,891 

$

363,104 

Adjusted Cost of Operations (1)

2021

$

28,017 

$

26,661 

$

28,470 

$

28,185 

$

111,333 

2020

$

26,669 

$

25,439 

$

27,637 

$

27,115 

$

106,860 

2019

$

26,808 

$

25,375 

$

25,969 

$

26,000 

$

104,152 

Cash NOI (1)

2021

$

66,993 

$

70,287 

$

70,691 

$

71,821 

$

279,792 

2020

$

66,440 

$

61,266 

$

63,864 

$

67,451 

$

259,021 

2019

$

62,493 

$

65,348 

$

64,220 

$

66,891 

$

258,952 

Weighted average square foot occupancy

2021

93.2%

93.9%

94.8%

95.7%

94.4%

2020

92.9%

92.4%

92.6%

92.7%

92.7%

2019

94.4%

94.0%

94.7%

94.5%

94.4%

Cash Rental Income per Occupied Square Foot (1)

2021

$

16.28 

$

16.49 

$

16.70 

$

16.67 

$

16.53 

2020

$

16.00 

$

14.97 

$

15.78 

$

16.29 

$

15.76 

2019

$

15.11 

$

15.41 

$

15.20 

$

15.69 

$

15.35 

Cash Rental Income per Available Square Foot (1)

2021

$

15.17 

$

15.48 

$

15.83 

$

15.97 

$

15.61 

2020

$

14.87 

$

13.84 

$

14.61 

$

15.10 

$

14.60 

2019

$

14.26 

$

14.48 

$

14.40 

$

14.83 

$

14.49 

____________________________

(1)Defined in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Analysis of Net Income–Same Park Portfolio table.

36


Analysis of Same Park Market Trends

The following tables set forth historical data by region related to the operations occupancies, realized rentsof our Same Park portfolio for Cash Rental Income, Adjusted Cost of Operations, weighted average occupancy, Cash Rental Income per Occupied Square Foot, and those expenses which have material seasonal trends Cash Rental Income per Available Square Foot (in thousands, except per square foot data):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Three Months Ended

 

 

 



March 31

 

June 30

 

September 30

 

December 31

 

 

Full Year

Adjusted rental income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

$

96,203 

 

$

95,849 

 

$

96,447 

 

$

97,634 

 

$

386,133 

2016

$

91,634 

 

$

91,938 

 

$

92,466 

 

$

92,962 

 

$

369,000 

2015

$

86,900 

 

$

87,757 

 

$

88,885 

 

$

90,262 

 

$

353,804 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted cost of operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

$

28,328 

 

$

28,118 

 

$

29,318 

 

$

29,810 

 

$

115,574 

2016

$

29,496 

 

$

27,210 

 

$

28,344 

 

$

27,879 

 

$

112,929 

2015

$

28,754 

 

$

27,254 

 

$

28,130 

 

$

26,638 

 

$

110,776 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Snow removal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

$

378 

 

$

103 

 

$

 

$

63 

 

$

544 

2016

$

1,810 

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,810 

2015

$

1,815 

 

$

123 

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,938 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

$

5,458 

 

$

5,309 

 

$

5,810 

 

$

5,410 

 

$

21,987 

2016

$

5,854 

 

$

5,007 

 

$

5,884 

 

$

5,332 

 

$

22,077 

2015

$

5,447 

 

$

5,387 

 

$

5,959 

 

$

5,142 

 

$

21,935 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average square foot occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

94.6% 

 

 

93.7% 

 

 

94.1% 

 

 

95.1% 

 

 

94.4% 

2016

 

94.2% 

 

 

93.7% 

 

 

94.2% 

 

 

94.8% 

 

 

94.2% 

2015

 

91.7% 

 

 

92.3% 

 

 

93.5% 

 

 

94.3% 

 

 

93.0% 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annualized realized rent per occupied square foot

2017

$

15.01 

 

$

15.10 

 

$

15.13 

 

$

15.16 

 

$

15.10 

2016

$

14.36 

 

$

14.48 

 

$

14.49 

 

$

14.47 

 

$

14.45 

2015

$

14.00 

 

$

14.04 

 

$

14.04 

 

$

14.12 

 

$

14.04 

For the Years

For the Years

Ended December 31,

Ended December 31,

Region

2021

2020

Variance

2020

2019

Variance

Geographic Data on Same Park

Cash Rental Income

Northern California (7.2 million feet)

$

114,970

$

105,833

8.6%

$

105,833

$

107,354

(1.4%)

Southern California (3.0 million feet)

53,347

47,802

11.6%

47,802

48,296

(1.0%)

Dallas (2.1 million feet)

20,563

19,270

6.7%

19,270

20,215

(4.7%)

Austin (2.0 million feet)

34,414

32,816

4.9%

32,816

30,365

8.1%

Northern Virginia (4.5 million feet)

78,382

77,017

1.8%

77,017

76,776

0.3%

South Florida (3.9 million feet)

49,631

44,119

12.5%

44,119

43,326

1.8%

Seattle (1.4 million feet)

20,354

19,311

5.4%

19,311

17,268

11.8%

Suburban Maryland (1.0 million feet)

19,464

19,713

(1.3%)

19,713

19,504

1.1%

Total Same Park (25.1 million feet)

391,125

365,881

6.9%

365,881

363,104

0.8%

Adjusted Cost of Operations

Northern California

25,956

25,121

3.3%

25,121

24,313

3.3%

Southern California

13,263

12,870

3.1%

12,870

12,521

2.8%

Dallas

7,100

7,145

(0.6%)

7,145

6,979

2.4%

Austin

12,670

12,041

5.2%

12,041

10,843

11.0%

Northern Virginia

26,983

25,382

6.3%

25,382

26,482

(4.2%)

South Florida

13,476

12,470

8.1%

12,470

11,977

4.1%

Seattle

5,233

5,051

3.6%

5,051

4,109

22.9%

Suburban Maryland

6,652

6,780

(1.9%)

6,780

6,928

(2.1%)

Total Same Park

111,333

106,860

4.2%

106,860

104,152

2.6%

Cash NOI

Northern California

89,014

80,712

10.3%

80,712

83,041

(2.8%)

Southern California

40,084

34,932

14.7%

34,932

35,775

(2.4%)

Dallas

13,463

12,125

11.0%

12,125

13,236

(8.4%)

Austin

21,744

20,775

4.7%

20,775

19,522

6.4%

Northern Virginia

51,399

51,635

(0.5%)

51,635

50,294

2.7%

South Florida

36,155

31,649

14.2%

31,649

31,349

1.0%

Seattle

15,121

14,260

6.0%

14,260

13,159

8.4%

Suburban Maryland

12,812

12,933

(0.9%)

12,933

12,576

2.8%

Total Same Park

$

279,792

$

259,021

8.0%

$

259,021

$

258,952

0.0%

Weighted average square foot occupancy

Northern California

94.5%

91.3%

3.5%

91.3%

96.1%

(5.0%)

Southern California

96.9%

95.0%

2.0%

95.0%

94.9%

0.1%

Dallas

90.1%

88.7%

1.6%

88.7%

93.3%

(4.9%)

Austin

94.5%

94.9%

(0.4%)

94.9%

91.8%

3.4%

Northern Virginia

92.8%

92.3%

0.5%

92.3%

91.9%

0.4%

South Florida

97.3%

93.5%

4.1%

93.5%

95.4%

(2.0%)

Seattle

94.7%

95.6%

(0.9%)

95.6%

96.0%

(0.4%)

Suburban Maryland

92.1%

93.4%

(1.4%)

93.4%

92.9%

0.5%

Total Same Park

94.4%

92.7%

1.8%

92.7%

94.4%

(1.8%)

Cash Rental Income per Occupied Square Foot (1)

Northern California

$

16.80

$

16.00

5.0%

$

16.00

$

15.42

3.8%

Southern California

$

18.92

$

17.29

9.4%

$

17.29

$

17.48

(1.1%)

Dallas

$

10.89

$

10.37

5.0%

$

10.37

$

10.35

0.2%

Austin

$

18.54

$

17.61

5.3%

$

17.61

$

16.84

4.6%

Northern Virginia

$

18.64

$

18.41

1.2%

$

18.41

$

18.44

(0.2%)

South Florida

$

13.19

$

12.20

8.1%

$

12.20

$

11.74

3.9%

Seattle

$

15.91

$

14.96

6.4%

$

14.96

$

13.31

12.4%

Suburban Maryland

$

19.31

$

19.27

0.2%

$

19.27

$

19.18

0.5%

Total Same Park

$

16.53

$

15.76

4.9%

$

15.76

$

15.35

2.7%

Cash Rental Income per Available Square Foot (1)

Northern California

$

15.87

$

14.61

8.6%

$

14.61

$

14.82

(1.4%)

Southern California

$

18.32

$

16.42

11.6%

$

16.42

$

16.60

(1.1%)

Dallas

$

9.82

$

9.21

6.6%

$

9.21

$

9.65

(4.6%)

Austin

$

17.53

$

16.72

4.8%

$

16.72

$

15.46

8.2%

Northern Virginia

$

17.30

$

16.99

1.8%

$

16.99

$

16.94

0.3%

South Florida

$

12.84

$

11.41

12.5%

$

11.41

$

11.21

1.8%

Seattle

$

15.08

$

14.30

5.5%

$

14.30

$

12.79

11.8%

Suburban Maryland

$

17.82

$

18.05

(1.3%)

$

18.05

$

17.86

1.1%

Total Same Park

$

15.61

$

14.60

6.9%

$

14.60

$

14.49

0.8%

____________________________

(1)Defined in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Analysis of Net Income–Same Park Portfolio table.

2637


Table of Contents

Analysis of Same Park Market Trends

The following tables set forth market rent, expense and occupancy trends in our Same Park facilities (in thousands, except per square foot data):  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

For the Years

 

 

 

For the Years

 

 



 

Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Ended December 31,

 

 

Region

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Variance

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Variance



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Geographic Data on Same Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted rental income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California (7.2 million feet)

$

93,032 

 

$

86,395 

 

7.7%

 

$

86,395 

 

$

78,837 

 

9.6%

Southern California (3.3 million feet)

 

50,269 

 

 

47,583 

 

5.6%

 

 

47,583 

 

 

45,947 

 

3.6%

Dallas (3.1 million feet)

 

33,027 

 

 

31,233 

 

5.7%

 

 

31,233 

 

 

30,259 

 

3.2%

Austin (2.0 million feet)

 

29,240 

 

 

27,467 

 

6.5%

 

 

27,467 

 

 

22,808 

 

20.4%

Northern Virginia (3.9 million feet)

 

75,590 

 

 

76,285 

 

(0.9%)

 

 

76,285 

 

 

77,197 

 

(1.2%)

South Florida (3.9 million feet)

 

41,082 

 

 

38,153 

 

7.7%

 

 

38,153 

 

 

35,399 

 

7.8%

Suburban Maryland (2.3 million feet)

 

47,742 

 

 

46,811 

 

2.0%

 

 

46,811 

 

 

48,884 

 

(4.2%)

Seattle (1.4 million feet)

 

16,151 

 

 

15,073 

 

7.2%

 

 

15,073 

 

 

14,473 

 

4.1%

Total Same Park (27.1 million feet)

 

386,133 

 

 

369,000 

 

4.6%

 

 

369,000 

 

 

353,804 

 

4.3%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted cost of operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

 

23,532 

 

 

22,619 

 

4.0%

 

 

22,619 

 

 

22,328 

 

1.3%

Southern California

 

13,382 

 

 

13,072 

 

2.4%

 

 

13,072 

 

 

12,927 

 

1.1%

Dallas

 

11,168 

 

 

11,165 

 

0.0%

 

 

11,165 

 

 

10,921 

 

2.2%

Austin

 

9,891 

 

 

9,487 

 

4.3%

 

 

9,487 

 

 

8,539 

 

11.1%

Northern Virginia

 

25,018 

 

 

25,494 

 

(1.9%)

 

 

25,494 

 

 

25,112 

 

1.5%

South Florida

 

11,349 

 

 

10,578 

 

7.3%

 

 

10,578 

 

 

10,885 

 

(2.8%)

Suburban Maryland

 

17,158 

 

 

16,603 

 

3.3%

 

 

16,603 

 

 

16,134 

 

2.9%

Seattle

 

4,076 

 

 

3,911 

 

4.2%

 

 

3,911 

 

 

3,930 

 

(0.5%)

Total Same Park

 

115,574 

 

 

112,929 

 

2.3%

 

 

112,929 

 

 

110,776 

 

1.9%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

 

69,500 

 

 

63,776 

 

9.0%

 

 

63,776 

 

 

56,509 

 

12.9%

Southern California

 

36,887 

 

 

34,511 

 

6.9%

 

 

34,511 

 

 

33,020 

 

4.5%

Dallas

 

21,859 

 

 

20,068 

 

8.9%

 

 

20,068 

 

 

19,338 

 

3.8%

Austin

 

19,349 

 

 

17,980 

 

7.6%

 

 

17,980 

 

 

14,269 

 

26.0%

Northern Virginia

 

50,572 

 

 

50,791 

 

(0.4%)

 

 

50,791 

 

 

52,085 

 

(2.5%)

South Florida

 

29,733 

 

 

27,575 

 

7.8%

 

 

27,575 

 

 

24,514 

 

12.5%

Suburban Maryland

 

30,584 

 

 

30,208 

 

1.2%

 

 

30,208 

 

 

32,750 

 

(7.8%)

Seattle

 

12,075 

 

 

11,162 

 

8.2%

 

 

11,162 

 

 

10,543 

 

5.9%

Total Same Park

$

270,559 

 

$

256,071 

 

5.7%

 

$

256,071 

 

$

243,028 

 

5.4%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average square foot occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

 

95.9% 

 

 

96.8% 

 

(0.9%)

 

 

96.8% 

 

 

95.8% 

 

1.0%

Southern California

 

96.4% 

 

 

96.2% 

 

0.2%

 

 

96.2% 

 

 

95.2% 

 

1.1%

Dallas

 

90.7% 

 

 

90.1% 

 

0.7%

 

 

90.1% 

 

 

87.3% 

 

3.2%

Austin

 

94.9% 

 

 

96.9% 

 

(2.1%)

 

 

96.9% 

 

 

90.4% 

 

7.2%

Northern Virginia

 

91.4% 

 

 

92.3% 

 

(1.0%)

 

 

92.3% 

 

 

91.3% 

 

1.1%

South Florida

 

97.5% 

 

 

94.0% 

 

3.7%

 

 

94.0% 

 

 

93.9% 

 

0.1%

Suburban Maryland

 

88.7% 

 

 

87.8% 

 

1.0%

 

 

87.8% 

 

 

89.6% 

 

(2.0%)

Seattle

 

98.1% 

 

 

98.5% 

 

(0.4%)

 

 

98.5% 

 

 

96.8% 

 

1.8%

Total Same Park

 

94.4% 

 

 

94.2% 

 

0.2%

 

 

94.2% 

 

 

93.0% 

 

1.3%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annualized realized rent per occupied square foot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

$

13.39 

 

$

12.32 

 

8.7%

 

$

12.32 

 

$

11.36 

 

8.5%

Southern California

$

15.90 

 

$

15.07 

 

5.5%

 

$

15.07 

 

$

14.70 

 

2.5%

Dallas

$

11.81 

 

$

11.25 

 

5.0%

 

$

11.25 

 

$

11.25 

 

Austin

$

15.69 

 

$

14.43 

 

8.7%

 

$

14.43 

 

$

12.85 

 

12.3%

Northern Virginia

$

21.10 

 

$

21.10 

 

 

$

21.10 

 

$

21.57 

 

(2.2%)

South Florida

$

10.90 

 

$

10.50 

 

3.8%

 

$

10.50 

 

$

9.75 

 

7.7%

Suburban Maryland

$

22.88 

 

$

22.65 

 

1.0%

 

$

22.65 

 

$

23.19 

 

(2.3%)

Seattle

$

11.84 

 

$

11.01 

 

7.5%

 

$

11.01 

 

$

10.76 

 

2.3%

Total Same Park

$

15.10 

 

$

14.45 

 

4.5%

 

$

14.45 

 

$

14.04 

 

2.9%

27


Table of Contents

Supplemental Same Park Data by Product Type

The following supplemental tables provide further detail of our by region Same Park adjusted rental income, adjusted costAdjusted Cost of operationsOperations and net operating income,NOI by region, further segregated by industrial, flex, office, and industrialoffice for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015.2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

For the Year Ended December 31, 2019

Flex

 

Office

 

Industrial

 

Total

 

Flex

 

Office

 

Industrial

 

Total

 

Flex

 

Office

 

Industrial

 

Total

Industrial

Flex

Office

Total

Industrial

Flex

Office

Total

Industrial

Flex

Office

Total

In thousands

In thousands

Adjusted Rental Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Rental Income:

Northern California

$

43,796 

 

$

10,790 

 

$

38,446 

 

$

93,032 

 

$

39,512 

 

$

10,199 

 

$

36,684 

 

$

86,395 

 

$

37,023 

 

$

8,328 

 

$

33,486 

 

$

78,837 

$

94,414

$

10,040

$

10,516

$

114,970

$

84,337

$

9,357

$

12,139

$

105,833

$

85,234

$

9,917

$

12,203

$

107,354

Southern California

 

43,686 

 

 

670 

 

 

5,913 

 

 

50,269 

 

 

41,183 

 

 

646 

 

 

5,754 

 

 

47,583 

 

 

39,863 

 

 

653 

 

 

5,431 

 

 

45,947 

39,072

13,423

852

53,347

34,879

12,108

815

47,802

35,198

12,341

757

48,296

Dallas

 

31,327 

 

 

 

 

1,700 

 

 

33,027 

 

 

29,610 

 

 

 

 

1,623 

 

 

31,233 

 

 

28,668 

 

 

 

 

1,591 

 

 

30,259 

12,568

7,995

20,563

11,780

7,490

19,270

12,230

7,985

20,215

Austin

 

27,310 

 

 

 

 

1,930 

 

 

29,240 

 

 

25,779 

 

 

 

 

1,688 

 

 

27,467 

 

 

21,714 

 

 

 

 

1,094 

 

 

22,808 

9,191

25,223

34,414

8,270

24,546

32,816

8,288

22,077

30,365

Northern Virginia

 

32,693 

 

 

42,897 

 

 

 

 

75,590 

 

 

32,388 

 

 

43,897 

 

 

 

 

76,285 

 

 

32,250 

 

 

44,947 

 

 

 

 

77,197 

20,381

22,270

35,731

78,382

19,972

21,327

35,718

77,017

18,124

21,272

37,380

76,776

South Florida

 

14,127 

 

 

208 

 

 

26,747 

 

 

41,082 

 

 

13,073 

 

 

245 

 

 

24,835 

 

 

38,153 

 

 

12,677 

 

 

169 

 

 

22,553 

 

 

35,399 

47,351

2,094

186

49,631

42,102

1,880

137

44,119

41,303

1,920

103

43,326

Seattle

12,723

7,075

556

20,354

11,831

6,873

607

19,311

10,231

6,302

735

17,268

Suburban Maryland

 

16,614 

 

 

31,128 

 

 

 

 

47,742 

 

 

15,758 

 

 

31,053 

 

 

 

 

46,811 

 

 

15,388 

 

 

33,496 

 

 

 

 

48,884 

4,357

15,107

19,464

4,146

15,567

19,713

4,307

15,197

19,504

Seattle

 

8,237 

 

 

575 

 

 

7,339 

 

 

16,151 

 

 

7,729 

 

 

597 

 

 

6,747 

 

 

15,073 

 

 

7,516 

 

 

586 

 

 

6,371 

 

 

14,473 

Total

 

217,790 

 

 

86,268 

 

 

82,075 

 

 

386,133 

 

 

205,032 

 

 

86,637 

 

 

77,331 

 

 

369,000 

 

 

195,099 

 

 

88,179 

 

 

70,526 

 

 

353,804 

240,057

88,120

62,948

391,125

217,317

83,581

64,983

365,881

214,915

81,814

66,375

363,104

Adjusted Cost of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

 

11,482 

 

 

2,903 

 

 

9,147 

 

 

23,532 

 

 

10,897 

 

 

3,147 

 

 

8,575 

 

 

22,619 

 

 

10,912 

 

 

3,094 

 

 

8,322 

 

 

22,328 

20,074

2,755

3,127

25,956

19,340

2,672

3,109

25,121

18,526

2,602

3,185

24,313

Southern California

 

11,917 

 

 

269 

 

 

1,196 

 

 

13,382 

 

 

11,614 

 

 

279 

 

 

1,179 

 

 

13,072 

 

 

11,457 

 

 

269 

 

 

1,201 

 

 

12,927 

9,343

3,575

345

13,263

9,053

3,473

344

12,870

8,869

3,369

283

12,521

Dallas

 

10,849 

 

 

 

 

319 

 

 

11,168 

 

 

10,839 

 

 

 

 

326 

 

 

11,165 

 

 

10,574 

 

 

 

 

347 

 

 

10,921 

4,015

3,085

7,100

3,885

3,260

7,145

3,702

3,277

6,979

Austin

 

9,206 

 

 

 

 

685 

 

 

9,891 

 

 

8,798 

 

 

 

 

689 

 

 

9,487 

 

 

7,919 

 

 

 

 

620 

 

 

8,539 

3,184

9,486

12,670

3,022

9,019

12,041

2,778

8,065

10,843

Northern Virginia

 

9,254 

 

 

15,764 

 

 

 

 

25,018 

 

 

9,763 

 

 

15,731 

 

 

 

 

25,494 

 

 

9,615 

 

 

15,497 

 

 

 

 

25,112 

6,190

6,823

13,970

26,983

5,785

6,333

13,264

25,382

6,143

6,191

14,148

26,482

South Florida

 

4,211 

 

 

67 

 

 

7,071 

 

 

11,349 

 

 

3,873 

 

 

69 

 

 

6,636 

 

 

10,578 

 

 

4,015 

 

 

95 

 

 

6,775 

 

 

10,885 

12,770

607

99

13,476

11,841

562

67

12,470

11,262

602

113

11,977

Seattle

3,279

1,701

253

5,233

3,192

1,635

224

5,051

2,417

1,492

200

4,109

Suburban Maryland

 

5,365 

 

 

11,793 

 

 

 

 

17,158 

 

 

5,215 

 

 

11,388 

 

 

 

 

16,603 

 

 

5,327 

 

 

10,807 

 

 

 

 

16,134 

1,237

5,415

6,652

1,243

5,537

6,780

1,229

5,699

6,928

Seattle

 

2,052 

 

 

190 

 

 

1,834 

 

 

4,076 

 

 

2,004 

 

 

193 

 

 

1,714 

 

 

3,911 

 

 

2,059 

 

 

200 

 

 

1,671 

 

 

3,930 

Total

 

64,336 

 

 

30,986 

 

 

20,252 

 

 

115,574 

 

 

63,003 

 

 

30,807 

 

 

19,119 

 

 

112,929 

 

 

61,878 

 

 

29,962 

 

 

18,936 

 

 

110,776 

60,092

28,032

23,209

111,333

57,361

26,954

22,545

106,860

54,926

25,598

23,628

104,152

NOI:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash NOI:

Northern California

 

32,314 

 

 

7,887 

 

 

29,299 

 

 

69,500 

 

 

28,615 

 

 

7,052 

 

 

28,109 

 

 

63,776 

 

 

26,111 

 

 

5,234 

 

 

25,164 

 

 

56,509 

74,340

7,285

7,389

89,014

64,997

6,685

9,030

80,712

66,708

7,315

9,018

83,041

Southern California

 

31,769 

 

 

401 

 

 

4,717 

 

 

36,887 

 

 

29,569 

 

 

367 

 

 

4,575 

 

 

34,511 

 

 

28,406 

 

 

384 

 

 

4,230 

 

 

33,020 

29,729

9,848

507

40,084

25,826

8,635

471

34,932

26,329

8,972

474

35,775

Dallas

 

20,478 

 

 

 

 

1,381 

 

 

21,859 

 

 

18,771 

 

 

 

 

1,297 

 

 

20,068 

 

 

18,094 

 

 

 

 

1,244 

 

 

19,338 

8,553

4,910

13,463

7,895

4,230

12,125

8,528

4,708

13,236

Austin

 

18,104 

 

 

 

 

1,245 

 

 

19,349 

 

 

16,981 

 

 

 

 

999 

 

 

17,980 

 

 

13,795 

 

 

 

 

474 

 

 

14,269 

6,007

15,737

21,744

5,248

15,527

20,775

5,510

14,012

19,522

Northern Virginia

 

23,439 

 

 

27,133 

 

 

 

 

50,572 

 

 

22,625 

 

 

28,166 

 

 

 

 

50,791 

 

 

22,635 

 

 

29,450 

 

 

 

 

52,085 

14,191

15,447

21,761

51,399

14,187

14,994

22,454

51,635

11,981

15,081

23,232

50,294

South Florida

 

9,916 

 

 

141 

 

 

19,676 

 

 

29,733 

 

 

9,200 

 

 

176 

 

 

18,199 

 

 

27,575 

 

 

8,662 

 

 

74 

 

 

15,778 

 

 

24,514 

34,581

1,487

87

36,155

30,261

1,318

70

31,649

30,041

1,318

(10)

31,349

Seattle

9,444

5,374

303

15,121

8,639

5,238

383

14,260

7,814

4,810

535

13,159

Suburban Maryland

 

11,249 

 

 

19,335 

 

 

 

 

30,584 

 

 

10,543 

 

 

19,665 

 

 

 

 

30,208 

 

 

10,061 

 

 

22,689 

 

 

 

 

32,750 

3,120

9,692

12,812

2,903

10,030

12,933

3,078

9,498

12,576

Seattle

 

6,185 

 

 

385 

 

 

5,505 

 

 

12,075 

 

 

5,725 

 

 

404 

 

 

5,033 

 

 

11,162 

 

 

5,457 

 

 

386 

 

 

4,700 

 

 

10,543 

Total

$

153,454 

 

$

55,282 

 

$

61,823 

 

$

270,559 

 

$

142,029 

 

$

55,830 

 

$

58,212 

 

$

256,071 

 

$

133,221 

 

$

58,217 

 

$

51,590 

 

$

243,028 

$

179,965

$

60,088

$

39,739

$

279,792

$

159,956

$

56,627

$

42,438

$

259,021

$

159,989

$

56,216

$

42,747

$

258,952

Percentage by Product Type

64.3%

21.5%

14.2%

100.0%

61.7%

21.9%

16.4%

100.0%

61.8%

21.7%

16.5%

100.0%


38

28


The following table sets forth key statistical information with respect to our Same Park leasing activities in 2017. As noted above, our

Our past revenue growth has come from contractual annual inflators,rent increases, as well as re-leasing of space at rates above outgoing rental rates. We believe the percentage difference between outgoing cash rent inclusive of estimated expense recoveries and incoming cash rent inclusive of estimated expense recoveries for leases executed (“Cash Rental Rate Change”) is useful in understanding trends in current market rates relative to our existing lease rates. The following table summarizes Cash Rental Rate Change and other key statistical information with respect to the Company’s leasing production by these eight regions (square feet in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2017



 

Square

 

 

 

 

Transaction

 

 



 

Footage

 

Customer

 

 

Costs per

 

Rental

Regions

 

Leased

 

Retention

 

 

Executed Foot

 

Rate Change (1)

Northern California

 

1,691 

 

68.8% 

 

$

1.76 

 

23.7% 

Southern California

 

1,332 

 

69.9% 

 

$

1.55 

 

4.4% 

Dallas

 

820 

 

56.1% 

 

$

3.23 

 

3.0% 

Austin

 

384 

 

44.8% 

 

$

2.43 

 

14.3% 

Northern Virginia

 

1,136 

 

66.3% 

 

$

7.57 

 

(9.2%)

South Florida

 

1,124 

 

62.5% 

 

$

1.50 

 

4.7% 

Suburban Maryland

 

483 

 

78.8% 

 

$

8.75 

 

(10.9%)

Seattle

 

446 

 

79.6% 

 

$

0.98 

 

12.2% 

Total

 

7,416 

 

66.1% 

 

$

3.18 

 

5.1% 

____________________________

(1)

Rental rate change is computed by taking the percentage difference between outgoing rents and incoming rents for leases executed during the period. Leases executed on spaces vacant for more than the preceding twelve months have been excluded.

During 2017 and 2016, most markets continued to reflect favorable conditions allowing for stable occupancy as well as increasing rental rates. With the exception of Northern Virginia and Suburban Maryland, new rental rates for the Company improved over expiring rental rates on executed leases as economic conditions and tenant demand remained healthy. Northern Virginia and Suburban Maryland continue to experience soft market conditions as evidenced by continued pressure on occupancy and rental rates. In these markets, rental rates on executed leases declined 9.2% and 10.9%, respectively, over expiring rentsits Same Park portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2017. Given lease expirations of 825,000 2021 (square feet in Northern Virginiathousands):

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021

Square

Transaction

Footage

Customer

Costs per

Cash Rental

Net Effective

Industrial

Leased

Retention

Executed Foot

Rate Change (1)

Rent Change (2)

Northern California

1,532 

76.3%

$

3.10 

12.1%

27.3%

Southern California

777 

79.2%

2.29 

6.2%

14.4%

Dallas

438 

80.8%

3.81 

4.0%

11.8%

Austin

294 

74.0%

2.67 

13.5%

41.0%

Northern Virginia

473 

86.4%

4.86 

3.7%

9.4%

South Florida

998 

59.9%

1.29 

11.5%

25.6%

Seattle

279 

74.0%

3.91 

11.5%

21.2%

Suburban Maryland

114 

68.5%

3.12 

(2.1%)

4.9%

Industrial Totals by Region

4,905 

74.1%

$

2.86 

9.2%

21.4%

Flex

Northern California

204 

69.4%

$

1.00 

(0.2%)

4.3%

Southern California

207 

76.5%

2.10 

1.0%

8.5%

Dallas

263 

76.8%

3.22 

4.8%

15.4%

Austin

169 

34.1%

5.10 

1.1%

7.2%

Northern Virginia

508 

91.9%

4.46 

(2.1%)

3.1%

South Florida

42 

74.6%

1.69 

8.3%

20.7%

Seattle

88 

47.5%

2.25 

6.1%

13.3%

Suburban Maryland

Flex Totals by Region

1,481 

71.0%

$

3.30 

0.8%

7.1%

Office

Northern California

85 

60.6%

$

0.82 

(12.0%)

(10.4%)

Southern California

10 

57.3%

2.16 

3.2%

10.5%

Dallas

Austin

Northern Virginia

458 

69.6%

8.89 

(4.1%)

2.4%

South Florida

Seattle

12 

41.1%

8.08 

5.7%

15.5%

Suburban Maryland

147 

78.4%

3.11 

(5.8%)

2.9%

Office Totals by Region

712 

69.9%

$

6.63 

(5.6%)

0.7%

Company Totals by Type

7,098 

72.8%

$

3.33 

4.9%

14.4%

____________________________

(1)Cash Rental Rate Change is computed by taking the percentage difference between the incoming initial billed monthly cash rental rates inclusive of estimated expense recoveries (excluding the impact of certain items such as concessions or future escalators) on new leases or extensions executed in the period, and 604,000 square feetthe outgoing monthly cash rental rates inclusive of estimated expense recoveries last billed on the previous lease for that space. Leases executed on spaces vacant for more than the preceding twelve months have been excluded from this measure.

(2)Net effective rent represents average rental payments for the term of a lease on a straight-line basis in Suburban Maryland throughaccordance with GAAP and excludes operating expense reimbursements.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company may continue to experience a decrease in rental income in these regions.

Non-Same Park facilities: Our Non-Same Park facilities are comprised2021, weighted average occupancy was 94.4%, an increase from weighted average occupancy of two office buildings in Maryland, with 226,000 rentable square feet purchased in 2016 at a purchase price of $13.3 million. Occupancy was 43.1% at December 31, 2017 compared to 18.5% at acquisition. Realized annual rent per occupied square foot was $25.34 for these properties92.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Weighted average cash rental rate growth on leases executed during the year ended December 31, 2021 was 4.9% while average net effective rent1 growth was 14.4%. Renewals of leases with existing customers represented 63.3% of our leasing activity for the year ended December 31, 2021. Average lease term of the leases executed during the year ended December 31, 2021 was 3.4 years, with associated average transaction costs (tenant improvements and leasing commissions) of $3.33 per square foot. For comparative purposes, average lease term and transaction costs on leases executed in the same period of 2020 were 3.4 years and $2.58 per square foot, respectively.

________________________

1Net effective rent represents average rental payments for the term of a lease on a straight-line basis in accordance with GAAP, excluding operating expense reimbursements.

39


Non-Same Park Portfolio: The table below reflects the assets comprising our Non-Same Park portfolio (in thousands):

Purchase

Square

Occupancy at

Acquired Property

Date Acquired

Location

Price

Feet

December 31, 2021

Jupiter Business Park

November 2021

Plano, TX

$

25,600 

141 

97.3%

Port America

September 2021

Grapevine, TX

123,268 

718 

95.2%

Pickett Industrial Park

October 2020

Alexandria, VA

46,582 

246 

36.6%

La Mirada Commerce Center

January 2020

La Mirada, CA

13,513 

73 

98.4%

San Tomas Business Center

December 2019

Santa Clara, CA

16,787 

79 

89.4%

Hathaway Industrial Park

September 2019

Santa Fe Springs, CA

104,330 

543 

100.0%

Walnut Avenue Business Park

April 2019

Signal Hill, CA

13,824 

74 

98.3%

Total Acquired Property

$

343,904 

1,874 

89.0%

Date

Total

Square

Occupancy at

Developed Property

Completed

Location

Cost

Feet

December 31, 2021

Freeport Industrial Building

March 2021

Irving, TX

$

9,052 

83 

100.0%

Total

$

352,956 

1,957 

89.4%

We believe that our management and operating infrastructure typically allows us to generate higher NOI from newly acquired real estate facilities than was achieved by the previous owners. However, it can take 24 or more months for us to fully achieve the higher NOI, and the ultimate levels of NOI to be achieved can be affected by changes in general economic conditions. As a result,Due to the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the Company’s ability to generate higher NOI from these newly acquired real estate facilities in the future, there can be no assurance that we will achieve our expectations with respect to these newly acquired real estate facilities.

We expect

Multifamily: As of December 31, 2021, we held a 95.0% controlling interest in a joint venture that owns Highgate at The Mile, a 395-unit apartment complex in Tysons, Virginia. The following table summarizes the Non-Same Park facilitieshistorical operating results of Highgate at The Mile and certain statistical information (in thousands, except per unit data):

For the Years

For the Years

Ended December 31,

Ended December 31,

2021

2020

Change

2020

2019

Change

Rental income

$

9,069 

$

9,464 

(4.2%)

$

9,464 

$

10,075 

(6.1%)

Cost of operations

4,647 

4,264 

9.0%

4,264 

4,137 

3.1%

NOI

$

4,422 

$

5,200 

(15.0%)

$

5,200 

$

5,938 

(12.4%)

Selected Statistical Data

Weighted average square foot occupancy

94.5%

92.9%

1.6%

92.9%

95.4%

(2.5%)

As of December 31, 2021

Total costs (1)

$

115,426 

Physical occupancy

95.7%

Average rent per unit (2)

$

2,078 

____________________________

(1)The project cost for Highgate at The Mile includes the underlying land at its assigned contribution value upon formation of the joint venture of $27.0 million, which includes unrealized land appreciation of $6.0 million that is not recorded on our balance sheet.

(2)Average rent per unit is defined as the total potential monthly rental revenue (actual rent for occupied apartment units plus market rent for vacant apartment units) divided by the total number of rentable apartment units.

The decrease in NOI in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to a decline in rental rates as result of the COVID-19 pandemic combined with an increase in cost of operations. The increase in cost of operations was attributed to an increase in property tax assessments. Due to the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the Company’s future ability to maintain existing occupancy levels and rental rates, we may continue to provide increasedexperience NOI levels below those which were achieved prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2018 as these facilities approach stabilized occupancy levels.the future.


40


Assets sold or held for sale or development:sale: These amounts include historical operating results with respect to properties that have beenwere sold and with respect to propertiesor held for sale or future potential development.sale.

We classified three office business parks aggregating 705,000 square feet located within our Southern California region (Irvine, Orange and Santa Ana) as properties held for disposition as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. These parks generated NOI of $8.4 million, $7.6 million and $6.8 million forFor the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, the operating results include the following: 0.7 million square feet of AHFS and 2015, respectively. While there can be no assurance1.0 million square feet of a completed sale, we expect to complete2021 Assets Sold.

For the sale of these assets during 2018.

A 123,000 rentable square foot vacant office building is being held for future potential development into a multi-family building. We expect no further material operations for this vacant property until development is complete. As noted above, we do not expect development activity to commence any earlier thanyear ended December 31, 2018.2020, the operating results include the following: 0.7 million square feet of AHFS, 1.0 million square feet of 2021 Assets Sold, and 153,000 square feet of 2020 Assets Sold.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the operating results include the following: 0.7 million square feet of AHFS, 1.0 million square feet of 2021 Assets Sold, 153,000 square feet of 2020 Assets Sold, and 1.3 million square feet of 2019 Assets Sold.

29


Depreciation and Amortization Expense: Depreciation and amortization expense decreased 5.2%2.9% in 20172021 compared to 20162020 and by 5.6%decreased 7.6% in 20162020 compared to 2015.2019. The decreasesdecrease in depreciation and amortization expense were2021 over 2020 was primarily due to acceleration of depreciation expense related to a building reclassified to held for development in 2020, which is also the cost of certain assets reachingprimary reason for the end of their depreciable lives.decrease in 2020 over 2019.

General and Administrative Expenses:Expense: General and administrative expense primarily represents executive and other compensation, including non-cash stock compensation, audit and tax fees, legal expenses primarily represent compensation for senior executives, tax compliance, legal and other costs associated with being a public company. General and administrative expenses decreased $5.2expense increased $4.5 million, or 34.9%31.2%, in 20172021 compared to 20162020 and increased $1.3$0.8 million, or 9.4%5.6%, in 20162020 compared to 2015. 2019.

The decreaseincrease in 20172021 over 20162020 was primarily due to increase in compensation expense mainly due to the addition of the new President and CEO, partially offset by the departure of senior executivesthe former COO, combined with an increase in 2016stock compensation expense, as well as an increase in professional fees related to the reincorporation of PSB from the state of California to the state of Maryland in the second quarter of 2021, the increase was also attributable to legal fees related to various corporate service projects and 2017 andan increase in executive procurement costs. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in expense due to accelerated stock compensation expense related to the ongoing LTEIP amortization ($2.8 millionformer CEO retirement in 2017 versus $4.7 million in 2016).the prior year. The increase in 20162020 over 20152019 was primarily due to $2.0 million charge to LTEIP amortization related to the departure of our former CEO and acquisition transaction costs of $328,000 expensed in 2016.

Analysis of Items Not Included in Operating Income

Interest and Other Expense: Interest and otherhigher stock compensation expense decreased $4.4 million, or 77.3%, in 2017 compared to 2016 and by $7.7 million, or 57.5%, in 2016 compared to 2015. The decreases were primarily due to a repayment of a $250.0 million mortgage note during the second quarter of 2016.

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture: Our equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture represents our pro rata equity in the earnings of our 95% equity investment in the joint venture that owns Highgate. We provided a construction loan to the joint venture, maturing in April, 2019 that has two one-year extension options, of up to $75.0 million. The interest income we receive on the loan is eliminated against our equity in earnings. The joint venture began leasing activities during 2017 and we recorded an equity loss in the unconsolidated joint venture of $805,000, comprised of our proportionate share of  $1.8 million in revenue, $1.5 million in cost of operations, and $1.2 million in depreciationaccelerated stock compensation expense for the year endedformer CEO (mentioned above) and an increase in professional fees related to various corporate service projects. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in compensation expense related to our President and CEO’s retirement and stock compensation expense incurred during 2019 tied to a modification of the Director Retirement Plan which did not recur in 2020.

Sale of Real Estate Facilities

On December 31, 2017.

The following table summarizes the joint venture’s project timeline and updates as of December 31, 2017:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Schedule

 

As of December 31, 2017

Apartment Units

 

Total Estimated
Project Costs (1)
(in thousands)

 

Construction Start

 

Initial Occupancy

 

Estimated Stabilization Period

 

% Completed

 

%
Occupied

 

Average Rent per Unit (2)

395

 

$

115,588 

 

Q3 2015

 

Q2 2017

 

Q4 2018

 

100.0% 

 

58.5% 

 

$

2,156 

____________________________

(1)

The project cost for Highgate reflects the underlying land at the assigned contribution value upon formation of the joint venture. The estimated total costs of the project include land basis of $15.3 million plus unrealized land appreciation of $11.6 million.

(2)

Average rate per unit is defined as the total potential monthly rental revenue (actual rent for occupied apartment homes plus market rent for vacant apartment homes) divided by the number of apartment units.

Excluding the equity loss in the unconsolidated joint venture of $805,000, our cumulative investment in and advances to the joint venture totaled $101.7 million at December 31, 2017.

Gain on sale of real estate facility and gain on sale of development rights: On May 1, 2017, we sold a two-building single-story office park comprising 44,000 square feet, located in Dallas, Texas, for net proceeds of $2.1 million, which resulted in a net gain of $1.2 million. On March 31, 2017, we sold development rights we had acquired in 2006 in connection with our acquisition of a business park in Silver Spring, Maryland for $6.5 million. We received net proceeds of $6.4 million, of which $1.5 million was received in prior years and $4.9 million was received in 2017. We recorded a net gain of $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

During 2015,30, 2021, the Company sold four business parks, aggregating 492,000a 53,000 square feet,foot industrial building located in non-strategic marketsBeltsville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $41.2$4.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $23.4$3.2 million. Additionally, as part of an eminent domain process,

On December 29, 2021, the Company sold five buildings, aggregating 82,000a 70,000 square feet, at the Company’s Overlake Business Parkfoot industrial-flex building located in Redmond, Washington,Irving, Texas, for $13.9net sale proceeds of $8.8 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $4.8$6.3 million. Including

On October 19, 2021, the fiveCompany sold a 371,000 square foot industrial-flex business parks aggregating 1.9park located in San Diego, California, for net sale proceeds of $311.1 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $301.3 million.

On September 17, 2021, the Company sold a 22,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $3.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $2.9 million.

On July 16, 2021, the Company sold a 244,000 square foot office business park located in Herndon, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $40.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $27.0 million.

On June 17, 2021, the Company sold a 198,000 square foot office-oriented flex business park located in Chantilly, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $32.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $19.2 million.

On September 16, 2020, the Company sold two industrial buildings totaling 40,000 square feet and 11.5 acreslocated in Redmond, Washington, which were subject to an eminent domain process for net sale proceeds of land$11.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $7.7 million.

On January 7, 2020, the Company sold a 113,000 square foot office building located at Metro Park North in 2014, we completed our stated objectiveRockville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of exiting non-strategic markets$29.3 million, which resulted in Sacramento, California, Oregon and Arizona.a gain on sale of $19.6 million.

On October 8, 2019, the Company sold 1.3 million rentable square feet located in Rockville and Silver Spring, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $144.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $16.6 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 20152019 and the notes to our consolidated financial statements, which set forth the major components of our historical liquidity and capital resources. The discussion below sets forth the factors which we expect will affect our future liquidity and capital resources or which may vary substantially from historical levels.

Overview

Our expected material cash requirements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and thereafter consist of (i) contractually obligated expenditures, including payments of principal and interest; (ii) other essential expenditures, including property operating expenses, maintenance capital expenditures and dividends paid in accordance with REIT distribution requirements; and (iii) opportunistic expenditures, including acquisitions and developments and repurchases of our securities. We expect to satisfy these short-term and long-term cash requirements through operating cash flow, disposition proceeds and opportunistic debt and equity financing.

Sources of Capital

Operating Cash Flow: We believe that our net cash provided by our operating activities will continue to be sufficient to enable us to meet our ongoing requirements for debt service, capital expenditures and distributions to our stockholders for the foreseeable future. In the last five years, we have retained $40 to $60 million in operating cash flow per year. Retained operating cash flow represents cash flow provided by operating activities, less stockholder and unit holder distributions and capital expenditures, excluding development costs. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, we had $27.1 million in unrestricted cash.

Proceeds from Dispositions: Refer to “Business Overview—Sale of Real Estate Facilities” above for a discussion of our dispositions. We expect to continue sell properties that are no longer consistent with our investment strategy and expect to use the proceeds from these dispositions to fund new acquisitions, development or other cash requirements.

Access to Capital Raising Strategy:Markets: As a REIT, we generallyare required to distribute substantially allat least 90% of our “REIT taxable income” to our shareholders,stockholders each year, which relative to a taxable C corporation, limits the amount of cash flow from operations that we can retain for investments.investment purposes, such as to fund acquisitions and developments. As a result, in order to grow our asset base, access to capital is important.

Our financial profile is characterized by strong credit metrics, including low leverage relative to our total capitalization and operating cash flows. We are a highly rated REIT, as rateddetermined by Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. Our corporate credit rating by Standard and PoorsPoor’s is A-, while our preferred sharesstock are rated BBB by Standard and PoorsPoor’s and Baa2 by Moodys. OurMoody’s. We believe our credit profile and ratings will enable us to effectivelyefficiently access both the public and private capital markets to raise capital.capital, as necessary.

In order to maintain efficient access to the capital markets, we target a minimum ratio of FFO (as defined below) to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions of 3.0 to 1.0. Ratio of FFO to fixed charges and preferred distributions is calculated by dividing FFO excluding fixed charges and preferred distributions by fixed charges and preferred distributions paid. Fixed charges include interest expense, and capitalized interest whileand preferred equity distributions include amounts paid to preferred shareholders.paid. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, the ratio toof FFO to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions paid was 4.96.1 to 1.0.

We have a $250.0 millionIn August 2021, we amended and restated the credit agreement governing our revolving Credit Facility thatto increase the aggregate principal amount of the Credit Facility from $250.0 million to $400.0 million and extend the expiration date to August 2025. The Credit Facility can also be expanded to $400.0 million which expires in January, 2022.$700.0 million. We can use the Credit Facility along with bank term debt,as necessary as temporary “bridge” financing until we are able to raise longer term capital. Historically we have funded our long-term capital requirements with retained operating cash flow and proceeds from the issuance of common and preferred securities. We will select among these sources of capital based upon availability, relative cost, the impact of constraints of certain forms of capital on our operations (such as covenants), as well asand the desire for leverage.

42


Short-term LiquidityCash Requirements

Contractual Commitments: Our material contractual commitments as of December 31, 2021 consist of principal and Capital Resource Analysis: We believe thatinterest on our net cash provided byCredit Facility, payment of dividends on our operating activitiespreferred stock (which if not paid will continue to be sufficient to enable us to meet our ongoing requirementsaccrue), contractual construction commitments for debt service, capital expendituresdevelopment projects, and distributions to our shareholders for the foreseeable future.ground lease obligations:

Credit Facility: As of December 31, 2017,2021, we had no balancehave $32.0 million outstanding on our Credit Facility. InSubsequent to December 31, 2021, the last five years, we have retained an average of $40 to $50 millionCompany repaid in operating cash flow per year. Retained operating cash flow represents cash flow provided by operating activities, less shareholder and unit holder distributions and capital expenditures.

Potential future uses of capital infull the next twelve months include the acquisition of additional real estate facilities, and potential future sources include the potential sale of real estate facilities, including proceeds from the potential sale of properties in Orange County, California.  A portion of the net proceeds of any such sale that is in excess of our taxable basis may have to be distributed to shareholders. We expect to invest an additional $3.1 million with respect to Highgate.

Required Debt Repayments: Asbalance outstanding as of December 31, 2017, we have no debt outstanding on our Credit Facility.2021. We are in compliance with all of the covenants and all other requirements of our Credit Facility. Our Credit Facility expires in August 2025.

Preferred stock dividends: We paid $46.6 million to preferred stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2021. We expect to continue to pay quarterly distributions of $9.6 million to our preferred stockholders for the foreseeable future or until such time as there is a change in the amount or composition of our series of preferred equity outstanding. Dividends on preferred equity are paid when and if declared by our Board and accumulate if not paid.

Contractual commitments: Contractual construction commitments as of December 31, 2021 are approximately $43.6 million.


December 31, 2021 are approximately $0.2 million for 2022 and $1.4 million thereafter.

Capital Expenditures: We define recurring capital expenditures as those necessary to maintain and operate our real estate at its current economic value. Nonrecurring capital improvements includegenerally are related to property renovationsreconfigurations and other capital expenditures related to repositioning asset acquisitions.

The following table sets forth our commercial capital expenditures paid for in the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 20152019 on an aggregate and per square foot basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

For the Years Ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2021

2020

2019

2021

2020

2019

(in thousands)

 

(per square foot)

Commercial Real Estate

(in thousands)

(per total weighted average square foot)

Recurring capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital improvements(1)

$

10,069 

 

$

8,336 

 

$

8,136 

 

$

0.36 

 

$

0.30 

 

$

0.29 

$

11,636 

$

9,497 

$

11,224 

$

0.42 

$

0.34 

$

0.40 

Tenant improvements

 

28,294 

 

 

16,086 

 

 

22,705 

 

 

1.01 

 

 

0.57 

 

 

0.80 

14,767 

15,948 

17,360 

0.53 

0.58 

0.62 

Lease commissions

 

7,477 

 

 

6,530 

 

 

9,005 

 

 

0.27 

 

 

0.23 

 

 

0.32 

8,719 

8,878 

8,267 

0.31 

0.32 

0.29 

Total recurring capital expenditures

 

45,840 

 

 

30,952 

 

 

39,846 

 

 

1.64 

 

 

1.10 

 

 

1.41 

Total commercial recurring

capital expenditures (1)

35,122 

34,323 

36,851 

1.26 

1.24 

1.31 

Nonrecurring capital improvements

 

4,379 

 

 

925 

 

 

3,808 

 

 

0.16 

 

 

0.03 

 

 

0.13 

2,705 

1,715 

2,494 

0.10 

0.06 

0.09 

Total capital expenditures

$

50,219 

 

$

31,877 

 

$

43,654 

 

$

1.80 

 

$

1.13 

 

$

1.54 

Total commercial capital

expenditures (1)

$

37,827 

$

36,038 

$

39,345 

$

1.36 

$

1.30 

$

1.40 

____________________________

(1)Per square foot amounts are calculated based on capital expenditures divided by total weighted average square feet owned for the periods presented.

(2)Excludes $13, $24, and $20 of recurring capital improvements on our multifamily asset in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.


43


The following table summarizes Same Park, Non-Same Park and assets sold or held for sale or development recurring capital expenditures paid and the related percentage of NOI for Same Park by region for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015 2019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Capital Expenditures

Recurring Capital Expenditures

 

Recurring Capital Expenditures

 

 

 

as a Percentage of NOI

Recurring Capital Expenditures

as a Percentage of NOI

Region

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Change

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Change

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2021

2020

Change

2020

2019

Change

2021

2020

2019

Same Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

 

$

3,642 

 

$

3,556 

 

2.4%

 

$

3,556 

 

$

6,164 

 

(42.3%)

 

 

5.2% 

 

 

5.6% 

 

10.9% 

$

8,654

$

6,354

36.2%

$

6,354

$

4,411

44.0%

9.5%

7.7%

5.3%

Southern California

 

 

3,025 

 

 

2,804 

 

7.9%

 

 

2,804 

 

 

3,055 

 

(8.2%)

 

 

8.2% 

 

 

8.1% 

 

9.3% 

3,302

3,209

2.9%

3,209

4,007

(19.9%)

8.3%

9.0%

11.1%

Dallas

 

 

4,023 

 

 

4,150 

 

(3.1%)

 

 

4,150 

 

 

6,803 

 

(39.0%)

 

 

18.4% 

 

 

20.7% 

 

35.2% 

3,491

2,466

41.6%

2,466

2,655

(7.1%)

25.8%

20.0%

19.7%

Austin

 

 

1,726 

 

 

1,263 

 

36.7%

 

 

1,263 

 

 

3,795 

 

(66.7%)

 

 

8.9% 

 

 

7.0% 

 

26.6% 

1,887

1,955

(3.5%)

1,955

4,539

(56.9%)

8.9%

9.2%

22.9%

Northern Virginia

 

13,468 

 

 

7,441 

 

81.0%

 

 

7,441 

 

 

8,753 

 

(15.0%)

 

 

26.6% 

 

 

14.7% 

 

16.8% 

8,880

8,751

1.5%

8,751

11,880

(26.3%)

17.3%

16.8%

23.1%

South Florida

 

 

2,055 

 

 

2,713 

 

(24.3%)

 

 

2,713 

 

 

2,434 

 

11.5%

 

 

6.9% 

 

 

9.8% 

 

9.9% 

2,273

2,313

(1.7%)

2,313

2,191

5.6%

6.3%

7.3%

6.9%

Seattle

1,713

1,326

29.2%

1,326

914

45.1%

11.3%

9.4%

7.0%

Suburban Maryland

 

 

9,937 

 

 

5,774 

 

72.1%

 

 

5,774 

 

 

4,422 

 

30.6%

 

 

32.5% 

 

 

19.1% 

 

13.5% 

2,141

1,793

19.4%

1,793

2,046

(12.4%)

17.1%

14.0%

15.9%

Seattle

 

 

763 

 

 

1,132 

 

(32.6%)

 

 

1,132 

 

 

1,602 

 

(29.3%)

 

 

6.3% 

 

 

10.1% 

 

15.2% 

Total Same Park

 

 

38,639 

 

 

28,833 

 

34.0%

 

 

28,833 

 

 

37,028 

 

(22.1%)

 

 

14.3% 

 

 

11.3% 

 

15.2% 

32,341

28,167

14.8%

28,167

32,643

(13.7%)

11.5%

10.7%

12.5%

Non-Same Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suburban Maryland

 

 

5,548 

 

 

164 

 

 

 

164 

 

 

 

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California

68

76

(10.5%)

76

100.0%

Southern California

508

2,134

(76.2%)

2,134

54

3851.9%

Dallas

371

100.0%

Northern Virginia

219

51

329.4%

51

100.0%

Total Non-Same Park

 

 

5,548 

 

 

164 

 

 

 

164 

 

 

 

100.0%

 

 

 

 

 

1,166

2,261

(48.4%)

2,261

54

4087.0%

Assets sold or held for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sale or development

 

 

1,653 

 

 

1,955 

 

(15.4%)

 

 

1,955 

 

 

2,818 

 

(30.6%)

 

 

19.5% 

 

 

19.2% 

 

24.8% 

Assets sold or held for sale

1,615

3,895

(58.5%)

3,895

4,154

(6.2%)

Total commercial recurring

capital expenditures

35,122

34,323

2.3%

34,323

36,851

(6.9%)

Multifamily

13

24

(45.8%)

24

20

20.0%

Total

 

$

45,840 

 

$

30,952 

 

48.1%

 

$

30,952 

 

$

39,846 

 

(22.3%)

 

 

16.4% 

 

 

11.6% 

 

15.7% 

$

35,135

$

34,347

2.3%

$

34,347

$

36,871

(6.8%)

The increase in Same Park recurring capital expenditures of $9.8 million, or 34.0%, was primarily due to transaction costs related to large renewals and leasing production in the Same Park portfolio during 2017. Non-Same Park capital expenditures are related to the repositioning and lease-up of a facility we acquired in Maryland in 2016.

In the last five years, our annual Same Park recurring capital expenditures have averaged generallyranged between $1.1010.7% and $1.72  per square foot, and 11.7% and 20.5%14.3% as a percentage of NOI.NOI, and we expected future recurring capital expenditures to be within this range. While what we disclose herein with respect to capital expenditures represents our best estimates at this time, there can be no assurance that these amounts will not change substantially in the future for various reasons, including the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on capital projects and leasing volume.

Redemption of Preferred Stock:Shares of preferred stock are redeemable by the Company five years after issuance or in order to preserve its status as a REIT, but shares of preferred stock are never redeemable at the option of the holder. Historically, we have reduced our cost of capital by refinancing higher coupon preferred securities with lower coupon preferred securities. In October, 2017, we completed a partial redemption of $220.0 million of $350.0 million of our 6.0% Series T preferred shares using funds received from our 5.25% Series X preferred shares issued during September, 2017. In December, 2017, we called for redemption of the remaining Series T preferred shares outstanding of $130.0 million. Funds received fromNovember 2021, our 5.20% Series Y preferred shares issued during December, 2017 were used to complete this redemption of Series T on January 3, 2018.

At December 31, 2017, our 5.75% Series UW preferred shares, with a par value of $230.0$189.8 million, were redeemableredeemed at par. We have one series ofOur Series X preferred securities that will become redeemable during 2018, at our option,shares, with a coupon rate of 5.70%5.25%, at a par value of $110.0$230.0 million (see Note 10 to ourand Series Y preferred shares, with a coupon rate of 5.20% ,at a par value of $200.0 million are redeemable in September 2022 and December 31, 2017 financial statements). Redemption2022, respectively. Future redemptions of such preferred sharesstock will depend upon many factors, including theavailable cash and our cost of capital. None ofRefer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements or more information on our preferred securities are redeemable at the option of the holders.stock.

32


Table of Contents

Investment in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Venture: We expect to invest an additional $3.1 million in the joint venture, in order to fund completion of Highgate. We do not expect any significant further investment will be necessary following completion.

Acquisitions of real estate facilities: Refer to “Business Overview—Acquisition of Real Estate Facilities” above for a discussion of our recent acquisitions.We have acquired real estate facilities in the past, and we continue to seek to acquire additional real estate facilities,facilities; however, there is significant competition to acquire existing facilities in our markets and there can be no assurance as to the levelvolume of facilities we may acquire.future acquisition activity.

Development of real estate facilities:Refer to “Business Overview—Development of Real Estate Facilities” above for a discussion of our recently completed developments.

As noted above, of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 83,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our 212 Business Park located in Kent, Washington. As of December 31, 2021, $2.2 million of the estimated $15.4 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $1.2 million that will be paid to various contractors as the project is completed.

44


As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an additional 123,000approximately 17,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our Boca Commerce Park, located withinin Boca Raton, Florida. As of December 31, 2021, $1.1 million of the estimated $4.0 million total development costs had been incurred and was reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $2.9 million that will be paid to various contractors as the project is completed.

In August 2020, we entered into the Brentford Joint Venture for the purpose of developing a second multifamily property, Brentford at The Mile, thata planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex. We contributed the Brentford Parcel at a value of $18.5 million, for which we are seeking to develop into another multi-family complex. There can be no assurancereceived equity contribution credit in the Brentford Joint Venture. Our cost basis in the Brentford Parcel was $5.1 million as to the timing or amount of any investment that may occur; however, we do not expect to incur any significant development costs on this potential project any earlier than December 31, 2018.2021.

Construction of Brentford at The Mile commenced in August 2020 and is anticipated to be completed over a period of 24 to 36 months at an estimated development cost of $110 million to $115 million, excluding land cost. As of December 31, 2021, the development cost incurred was $54.8 million, which is reflected in land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets along with our $5.1 million cost basis in the Brentford Parcel. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded non-capitalizable demolition costs of $0.3 million in interest and other expense on our consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $39.3 million that will be paid to various contractors as the project is completed.

Repurchase of Common Stock: Our Board has approved a common stock repurchase program and we may in the future acquire our shares under the program. As of December 31, 2021, management has the authorization to repurchase an additional 1,614,721 shares. No shares of common stock were repurchased under the board-approved common stock repurchase program during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015. As of December 31, 2017, management has the authorization to repurchase an additional 1,614,721 shares. 2019.

Requirement to Pay Distributions:For all periods presented herein, we have electedOur election to be treatedtaxed as a REIT, as defined inby the Code.Code, applies to all periods presented herein. As a REIT, we do not incur U.S. federal corporate income tax on our “REIT taxable income” (generally, net rents and gains from real property, dividends and interest) that is fully distributed each year (for this purpose, certain distributions paid in a subsequent year may be considered), and if we continue to meet certain organizational and operational rules.requirements. We believe we have met these requirements in all periods presented herein, and we expect towe will continue to elect and qualify as a REIT.REIT in future periods.

We paid REIT qualifying distributions of $142.9$288.3 million ($50.445.7 million to preferred shareholdersstockholders and $92.5$242.6 million to common shareholders)stockholders) during the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

We estimatedeclared a one-time special cash dividend of $4.60 per share (the “Special Cash Dividend”) along with the annual distributions requirements with respect to our preferred shares outstanding atfourth quarter regular dividend of $1.05 per share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 (excluding securities that were redeemed in early January, 2018)2021. The Special Cash Dividend was declared to be $51.8 million per year.distribute a portion of the excess income attributable to gains on sales from asset dispositions during 2021.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Board increased our quarterly dividend from $0.75 per common share to $0.85 per common share, which is an increase of $0.10, or 13.3%, over the previous quarter’s distribution. Our consistent, long-term dividend policy has been to distribute onlyset dividend distribution amounts based on our taxable income. Future quarterly distributions with respect to the common sharesstock will continue to be determined based upon our REIT distributionsdistribution requirements after taking into considerationand, along with distributions to the preferred shareholders andstockholders, we expect will be funded with cash provided by operating activities.


45


Table of Contents

Funds from Operations, Core Funds from Operations, and Core Funds from OperationsAvailable for Distribution

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and FFO per share areis a non-GAAP measuresmeasure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts and areis considered a helpful measuresmeasure of REIT performance by REITs and many REIT analysts. FFO represents GAAP net income before real estate depreciation and amortization expense, gains or losses fromon sales of operating properties and land and impairment charges which are excluded because they are based upon historicalon real estate costs and assume that building values diminish ratably over time, while we believe that real estate values fluctuate due to market conditions. FFO per share represents FFO allocable to common and dilutive shares, divided by aggregate common and dilutive shares. FFO and FFO per share are not a substitute for net income or earnings per share. FFO is not a substitute for GAAP net cash flow in evaluating our liquidity or ability to pay dividends, because it excludes investing and financing activities presented on our consolidated statements of cash flows. In addition, other REITs may compute these measures differently, so comparisons among REITs may not be helpful.assets.

33


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles from net income allocable to common shareholders to FFO and net income per share to FFO per share (amounts in thousands, except per share data):  



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

Net income allocable to common shareholders

$

90,425 

 

$

62,872 

 

$

68,291 

 

$

113,154 

 

$

43,851 

Gain on sale of land and real estate facilities

 

(1,209)

 

 

 

 

(28,235)

 

 

(92,373)

 

 

Gain on sale of development rights

 

(6,365)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

94,270 

 

 

99,486 

 

 

105,394 

 

 

110,357 

 

 

108,917 

Depreciation from unconsolidated joint venture

 

1,180 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income allocated to noncontrolling interests

 

24,279 

 

 

16,955 

 

 

18,495 

 

 

30,729 

 

 

12,952 

Net income allocated to restricted stock unit holders

 

761 

 

 

569 

 

 

299 

 

 

329 

 

 

125 

FFO allocable to common and dilutive shares

$

203,341 

 

$

179,882 

 

$

164,244 

 

$

162,196 

 

$

165,845 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

27,207 

 

 

27,089 

 

 

26,973 

 

 

26,899 

 

 

24,732 

Weighted average common operating partnership units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

outstanding

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

Weighted average restricted stock units outstanding

 

187 

 

 

290 

 

 

130 

 

 

69 

 

 

51 

Weighted average common share equivalents outstanding

 

205 

 

 

90 

 

 

78 

 

 

101 

 

 

101 

Total common and dilutive shares

 

34,904 

 

 

34,774 

 

 

34,486 

 

 

34,374 

 

 

32,189 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share — diluted

$

3.30 

 

$

2.31 

 

$

2.52 

 

$

4.19 

 

$

1.77 

Gain on sale of land and real estate facilities

 

(0.03)

 

 

 

 

(0.82)

 

 

(2.68)

 

 

Gain on sale of development rights

 

(0.18)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization, including amounts from

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

investments in unconsolidated joint venture

 

2.74 

 

 

2.86 

 

 

3.06 

 

 

3.21 

 

 

3.38 

FFO per share

$

5.83 

 

$

5.17 

 

$

4.76 

 

$

4.72 

 

$

5.15 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We also present “CoreCore FFO per share,” aand Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) which are both also non-GAAP measure that representsmeasures. The Company defines Core FFO per shareas FFO excluding the net impact of (i) income allocated to preferred shareholderstockholders to the extent redemption value exceeds the related carrying value (a “Preferred Redemption Allocation”),and (ii) separation settlement payments, as well as charges or reversals related to stock based compensation, due to the departure of senior executives and (iii) certain other non-cash and/or nonrecurring income or expense items. We believe our presentation of items as appropriate. FAD represents Core FFO assists investorsadjusted to (i) deduct recurring capital improvements and analystscapitalized tenant improvements and lease commissions and (ii) remove certain non-cash income or expense items such as amortization of deferred rent receivable and stock compensation expense.

FFO for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $6.67 per share representing an increase of 2.5% from the same period in evaluating 2020. The increases in FFO per share were the result of higher NOI, partially offset by the $6.4 million non-cash charge related to the redemption of the Series W preferred stock, the $3.6 million for state income tax provision as described above, as well as higher general and administrative expense.

Core FFO was $6.97 and $6.57 per share for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2021, Core FFO excludes the impact of (i) the $6.4 million non-cash charge related to the redemption of the Series W preferred stock in November 2021 (ii) a $3.6 million charge for a state income tax provision due to differences between state and federal tax code, and (iii) a one-time cost associated with the Company’s reincorporation as a Maryland corporation of $0.5 million incurred during the second quarter of 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Core FFO excludes the impact of (i) accelerated amortization of stock compensation expense of $1.7 million related to the retirement of our comparative operating performance between reporting periods. However,former President and CEO and (ii) non-capitalizable demolition costs of $0.3 million.


46


The following table reconciles net income allocable to common stockholders to FFO, Core FFO and FAD as well as net income per share to FFO per share and Core FFO per share (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

For the Years Ended December 31,

2021

2020

2019

Net income allocable to common stockholders

$

393,088 

$

124,645 

$

108,703 

Adjustments

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

(359,875)

(27,273)

(16,644)

Depreciation and amortization expense

93,486 

96,314 

104,249 

Net income allocated to noncontrolling interests

104,270 

33,158 

29,006 

Net income allocated to restricted stock unit holders

2,613 

716 

910 

FFO allocated to JV partner

(78)

(118)

(149)

FFO allocable to diluted common stock and units

233,504 

227,442 

226,075 

Maryland reincorporation costs

510 

Non-capitalizable demolition costs

335 

Acceleration of stock compensation expense

due to President and CEO retirement

1,687 

Preferred securities redemption charge

6,434 

11,007 

Income tax expense

3,600 

Core FFO allocable to diluted common stock and units

$

244,048 

$

229,464 

$

237,082 

Adjustments

Recurring capital improvements

(11,649)

(9,521)

(11,244)

Tenant improvements

(14,767)

(15,948)

(17,360)

Capitalized lease commissions

(8,719)

(8,878)

(8,267)

Non-cash rental income (1)

(2,800)

(4,713)

(3,936)

Non-cash stock compensation expense (2)

8,495 

3,961 

4,956 

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of stock upon vesting

of restricted stock units

(3,940)

(4,216)

(6,350)

FAD allocable to diluted common stock and units

$

210,668 

$

190,149 

$

194,881 

Weighted average outstanding

Common stock

27,534 

27,475 

27,418 

Common operating partnership units

7,305 

7,305 

7,305 

Restricted stock units

50 

51 

124 

Common stock equivalents

102 

88 

108 

Total common and dilutive stock

34,991 

34,919 

34,955 

Reconciliation of Earnings per Share to FFO per Share

Net income per common share — diluted

$

14.22 

$

4.52 

$

3.95 

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

(10.29)

(0.78)

(0.48)

Net income allocated to restricted stock unit holders

0.07 

0.02 

0.02 

Depreciation and amortization expense

2.67 

2.75 

2.98 

FFO per share

6.67 

6.51 

6.47 

Maryland reincorporation costs

0.02 

Non-capitalizable demolition costs

0.01 

Acceleration of stock compensation expense

due to President and CEO retirement

0.05 

Preferred securities redemption charge

0.18 

0.31 

Income tax expense

0.10 

Core FFO per share

$

6.97 

$

6.57 

$

6.78 

____________________________

(1)Non-cash rental income includes amortization of deferred rent receivable (net of write-offs), in-place lease intangible, tenant improvement reimbursements, and lease incentives.

(2)Amounts shown are net of accelerated stock compensation expense related to the former President and CEO retirement, which is also excluded from the computation of Core FFO.

We believe FFO, Core FFO, and FAD assist investors in analyzing and comparing the operating and financial performance of a company’s real estate from period to period. FFO, Core FFO, and FAD are not a substitutesubstitutes for GAAP net income per share. Becauseincome. In addition, other REITs may not compute FFO, Core FFO, per share in the same manner as we do, may not use the same terminology or may not present such a measure, Core FFO per share may not be comparable among REITs.and FAD differently, which could inhibit comparability.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

FFO per share

$

5.83 

 

$

5.17 

 

$

4.76 

 

$

4.72 

 

$

5.15 

Preferred Redemption Allocation

 

0.31 

 

 

0.21 

 

 

0.07 

 

 

 

 

Lease buyout payments

 

 

 

(0.01)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.07)

Net impact due to departure of senior executives

 

(0.01)

 

 

0.06 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition transaction costs

 

 

 

0.01 

 

 

 

 

0.01 

 

 

0.03 

Gain on sale of ownership interest in STOR-Re

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.04)

Core FFO per share

$

6.13 

 

$

5.44 

 

$

4.83 

 

$

4.73 

 

$

5.07 

47

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations: As of December 31, 2017, the Company is scheduled to pay cash dividends of $51.8 million per year on its preferred equity outstanding (excluding 5,200,000 depositary shares of Series T Preferred Stock redeemed on January 3, 2018). Dividends are paid when and if declared by the Company’s Board and accumulate if not paid. Shares of preferred equity are redeemable by the Company in order to preserve its status as a REIT and are also redeemable five years after issuance, but are not redeemable at the option of the holder.

34


Table of Contents

Our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 and their impact on our cash flows and liquidity are summarized below (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

 

Less than 1 year

 

1 - 3 years

 

4 - 5 years

 

More than 5 years

Transaction costs (1)

$

12,287 

 

$

12,287 

 

$

 

$

 

$

Joint venture commitments (2)

 

3,133 

 

 

3,133 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ground lease obligations (3)

 

250 

 

 

131 

 

 

119 

 

 

 

 

Total

$

15,670 

 

$

15,551 

 

$

119 

 

$

 

$

____________________________

(1)

Represents transaction costs, including tenant improvements and lease commissions, which we are committed to under the terms of executed leases.

(2)

Represents future expected loan advances to the joint venture under contract at December 31, 2017.

(3)

Represents future contractual payments on land under various operating leases.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

To limit the Company’s exposure to market risk, the Company principally finances its operations and growth with permanent equity capital consisting of either common or preferred stock. The Company had noAs of December 31, 2021, we have $32.0 million outstanding on our Credit Facility. As a result, the Company’s debt outstanding as a percentage of total equity (based on book values) was 1.6 % as of December 31, 2017.2021.

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Credit Facility, which is subject to variable interest rates. See Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the terms, valuations, and approximate principal maturities of the Company’s indebtedness, including the Credit Facility. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company, the difference between the carrying amount of debt and its fair value is insignificant.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements of the Company at December 31, 20172021 and 20162020 and for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 20152019 and the report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,independent registered public accounting firm, thereon and the related financial statement schedule, are included elsewhere herein. Reference is made to the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules in Item 15.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer who is also serving as interimand Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2017.2021. These controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required for disclosure is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the requisite time periods and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer who is also serving as actingand Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

35


Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer who is also serving as actingand Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. 2021.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172021 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 20172021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

48

36


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

PS Business Parks, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

We have audited PS Business Parks, Inc.’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, PS Business Parks, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material aspects,respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of PS Business Parks, Inc. as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016, and2020, the related consolidated statements of income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated February 23, 201822, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the SecuritySecurities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 23, 201822, 2022

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item with respect to directors is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed in connection with the annual shareholders’stockholders’ meeting to be held in 20182022 (the “Proxy Statement”) under the caption “Election“Proposal 1: Election of Directors.”

The following is a biographical summary of theInformation required by this item with respect to executive officers ofis hereby incorporated by reference to the Company:material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Our Named Executive Officers.”

Maria R. Hawthorne, age 58, was named Chief Executive Officer and elected as a Director of the Company in July, 2016. Ms. Hawthorne is also serving as interim Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Hawthorne was promoted to President in August, 2015 and continues to serves as President of the Company. Ms. Hawthorne most recently served as Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company from July, 2013 to July, 2015. Ms. Hawthorne served as Executive Vice President, East Coast from February, 2011 to July, 2013. Ms. Hawthorne was Senior Vice President from March, 2004 to February, 2011, with responsibility for property operations on the East Coast, which includes Northern Virginia, Maryland and South Florida. From June, 2001 through March, 2004, Ms. Hawthorne was Vice President of the Company, responsible for property operations in Virginia. From July, 1994 to June, 2001, Ms. Hawthorne was a Regional Manager of the Company in Virginia. From August, 1988 to July, 1994, Ms. Hawthorne was a General Manager, Leasing Director and Property Manager for American Office Park Properties. Ms. Hawthorne earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree in International Relations from Pomona College.

John W. Petersen, age 54, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since he joined the Company in December, 2004. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Petersen was Senior Vice President, San Jose Region, for Equity Office Properties from July, 2001 to December, 2004, responsible for 11.3 million square feet of multi-tenant office, industrial and R&D space in Silicon Valley. Prior to EOP, Mr. Petersen was Senior Vice President with Spieker Properties, from 1995 to 2001 overseeing the growth of that company’s portfolio in San Jose, through acquisition and development of nearly three million square feet. Mr. Petersen is a graduate of The Colorado College in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and was recently the President of National Association of Industrial and Office Parks, Silicon Valley Chapter.

Information required by this item with respect to the nominating process, the audit committee and the audit committee financial expert is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.”

Information required by this item with respect to a code of ethics is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Corporate Governance and Board Matters.” We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which is available on our website at www.psbusinessparks.com. The information contained on the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any amendments to or waivers of the code of ethics granted to the Company’s executive officers or the controller will be published promptly on our website or by other appropriate means in accordance with SEC rules. The public may also download these materials from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Information required by this item with respect to the compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Corporate Governance and Board Matters,” “Executive Compensation,” “Corporate Governance and Board Matters — Compensation“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”Participation,” “Compensation of Directors,” Compensation Discussion and “Report of theAnalysis (CD&A),” “Executive Compensation Committee.Tables, “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Pay Ratio Disclosure.”

38


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTAND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”


50


The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20172021 on the Company’s equity compensation plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

 

Number of

 

 

Weighted

 

Number of Securities

 

Number of

Weighted

Number of Securities

 

Securities to be

 

 

Average

 

Remaining Available for

 

Securities to be

Average

Remaining Available for

 

Issued Upon

 

 

Exercise Price of

 

Future Issuance under

 

Issued Upon

Exercise Price of

Future Issuance under

 

Exercise of

 

 

Outstanding

 

Equity Compensation

 

Exercise of

Outstanding

Equity Compensation

 

Outstanding

 

 

Options,

 

Plans (Excluding

 

Outstanding

Options,

Plans (Excluding

 

Options, Warrants

 

 

Warrants and

 

Securities Reflected in

 

Options, Warrants

Warrants and

Securities Reflected in

Plan Category

 

and Rights

 

 

Rights

 

 

Column (a))

 

and Rights

Rights

Column (a)) (2)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

 

337,492 

 

$

80.86 

 

 

1,046,768 

 

159,570 

$

123.87 

714,146 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

337,492 

*

 

$

80.86 

*

 

1,046,768 

*

159,570 

$

123.87 

714,146 

____________________________

____________________________

*(1)Represents shares of our common stock available for issuance under the Company’s 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan (2012 Plan). The 2012 Plan will expire in February 2022.

(2)Amounts include restrictedremaining available for future issuance account for stock units.options and RSUs issued and outstanding.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” and “Certain Relationships“Additional Information about our Directors and Related Transactions.Executive Officers; Certain Relationships.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accountants.”

39


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

a.1. Financial Statements

The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules are filed as part of this report.

2.Financial Statements Schedule

The financial statements schedule listed in the accompanying Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules are filed as part of this report.

3.Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference in this report.

b.Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference in this report.

c.Financial Statement Schedules

Not applicable.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.


4051


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

(Item 15(a)(1) and Item 15(a)(2))

All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.


4152


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

PS Business Parks, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PS Business Parks, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 23, 201822, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the SecuritySecurities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures includeincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.


53


Purchase price accounting

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed two acquisitions during 2021 for consideration of approximately $149 million. As explained in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions, and as such, are recorded at the price to acquire the real estate property, including acquisition costs. The purchase price is allocated to land, building, and acquired lease intangible assets and/or liabilities based upon the relative fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible lease assets and liabilities. The relative fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible lease assets and liabilities were determined by the Company and its valuation specialist utilizing available market information.

Auditing the Company’s accounting for its acquisitions was complex due to the significant estimation required by management in determining the fair values of the acquired land, building, and intangible lease assets and liabilities. The significant estimation was primarily due to the judgmental nature of the inputs to the valuation models used to measure the fair value of the tangible and intangible lease assets and liabilities as well as the sensitivity of the respective fair values to the significant underlying assumptions. The Company utilized the sales comparison approach to measure the fair value of the acquired land and a combination of the discounted cash flow and replacement costs methods to measure the fair value of the remaining acquired tangible and intangible assets and liabilities. The more significant assumptions utilized included revenue growth rates, discount rates, market rental rates, and capitalization rates. These significant assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over management’s accounting for acquired real estate properties, including controls over the Company’s review of the assumptions underlying the purchase price allocation, the cash flow projections, and the accuracy of the underlying data used. For example, we tested controls over the determination of the fair value of the land, building and intangible lease assets and liabilities, including the controls over the review of the valuation models and the underlying assumptions used to develop such estimates.

For each of the Company’s real estate property acquisitions, we read the purchase and sale agreements, and evaluated whether the Company had appropriately determined whether the transaction was a business combination or asset acquisition. We also evaluated the significant assumptions and methods used in developing the fair value estimates of the tangible assets and intangible lease assets acquired and liabilities assumed. To test the estimated fair value of the land, building and intangible lease assets and liabilities, we performed audit procedures that included, among other procedures, evaluating the Company’s use of the income approach and testing the significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model, and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data supporting the significant assumptions and estimates. For example, we agreed the contractual rents used in the determination of the in-place and above/below market lease intangible assets and liabilities to tenant leases and market information. We also involved our valuation specialists to assist in the assessment of the methodology utilized by the Company, performed procedures to corroborate the reasonableness of the significant assumptions utilized in the developing the fair value estimates, and performed corroborative calculations to assess the reasonableness of the acquired building asset. For example, our valuation specialists (i) used independently identified data sources to evaluate the appropriateness of management’s selected comparable land sales, (ii) recalculated the asset values and performed comparative calculations assuming a combination of some or all of management’s assumptions and our independently verified assumptions, and (iii) obtained market specific information for the revenue growth rates, discount rates, market rental rates, and capitalization rates to corroborate the market information utilized by the Company.

54


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1997.

Los Angeles, California

February 23, 201822, 2022

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (Item 15(a)(1) and Item 15(a)(2))

PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(InAmounts in thousands, except share data)

December 31,

2021

2020

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents

$

27,074 

$

69,083 

Real estate facilities, at cost

Land

867,345 

843,765 

Buildings and improvements

2,239,137 

2,080,895 

3,106,482 

2,924,660 

Accumulated depreciation

(1,178,397)

(1,101,739)

1,928,085 

1,822,921 

Properties held for sale, net

33,609 

75,138 

Land and building held for development, net

78,990 

37,922 

2,040,684 

1,935,981 

Rent receivable

1,621 

1,519 

Deferred rent receivable

37,581 

36,788 

Other assets

16,262 

14,334 

Total assets

$

2,123,222 

$

2,057,705 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Accrued and other liabilities

$

97,151 

$

82,065 

Credit facility

32,000 

Total liabilities

129,151 

82,065 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

Equity

PS Business Parks, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,

30,200 and 37,790 shares issued and outstanding at

December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively

755,000 

944,750 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,

27,589,807 and 27,488,547 shares issued and outstanding at

December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively

275 

274 

Paid-in capital

752,444 

738,022 

Accumulated earnings

226,737 

73,631 

Total PS Business Parks, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity

1,734,456 

1,756,677 

Noncontrolling interests

259,615 

218,963 

Total equity

1,994,071 

1,975,640 

Total liabilities and equity

$

2,123,222 

$

2,057,705 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



December 31,



2017

 

2016

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

114,882 

 

$

128,629 



 

 

 

 

 

Real estate facilities, at cost

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

770,310 

 

 

770,310 

Buildings and improvements

 

2,166,579 

 

 

2,128,828 



 

2,936,889 

 

 

2,899,138 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(1,168,980)

 

 

(1,090,979)



 

1,767,909 

 

 

1,808,159 

Properties held for disposition, net

 

45,450 

 

 

48,445 

Land and building held for development

 

29,665 

 

 

27,028 



 

1,843,024 

 

 

1,883,632 

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

 

100,898 

 

 

67,190 

Rent receivable, net

 

1,876 

 

 

1,945 

Deferred rent receivable, net

 

32,062 

 

 

29,770 

Other assets

 

7,417 

 

 

8,205 

Total assets

$

2,100,159 

 

$

2,119,371 



 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Accrued and other liabilities

$

80,223 

 

$

78,657 

Preferred stock called for redemption

 

130,000 

 

 

230,000 

Total liabilities

 

210,223 

 

 

308,657 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

PS Business Parks, Inc.’s shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

38,390 and 35,190 shares issued and outstanding at

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

959,750 

 

 

879,750 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

27,254,607 and 27,138,138 shares issued and outstanding at

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

272 

 

 

271 

Paid-in capital

 

735,067 

 

 

733,671 

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

 

(1,778)

 

 

(433)

Total PS Business Parks, Inc.’s shareholders’ equity

 

1,693,311 

 

 

1,613,259 

Noncontrolling interests

 

196,625 

 

 

197,455 

Total equity

 

1,889,936 

 

 

1,810,714 

Total liabilities and equity

$

2,100,159 

 

$

2,119,371 

See accompanying notes.

43

56


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(InAmounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Years Ended December 31,

For the Years Ended December 31,

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2021

2020

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

$

402,179 

 

$

386,871 

 

$

373,135 

$

438,703 

$

415,623 

$

429,846 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of operations

 

125,340 

 

 

123,108 

 

 

121,224 

130,896 

125,513 

128,343 

Depreciation and amortization

 

94,270 

 

 

99,486 

 

 

105,394 

93,486 

96,314 

104,249 

General and administrative

 

9,679 

 

 

14,862 

 

 

13,582 

19,057 

14,526 

13,761 

Total operating expenses

 

229,289 

 

 

237,456 

 

 

240,200 

243,439 

236,353 

246,353 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

172,890 

 

 

149,415 

 

 

132,935 

Interest and other income

 

942 

 

 

1,233 

 

 

1,130 

2,536 

1,234 

4,492 

Interest and other expense

 

(1,285)

 

 

(5,664)

 

 

(13,330)

(4,646)

(1,072)

(657)

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture

 

(805)

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

 

1,209 

 

 

 

 

28,235 

359,875 

27,273 

16,644 

Gain on sale of development rights

 

6,365 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

179,316 

 

 

144,984 

 

 

148,970 

553,029 

206,705 

203,972 

Allocation to noncontrolling interests

 

(24,279)

 

 

(16,955)

 

 

(18,495)

(104,270)

(33,158)

(29,006)

Net income allocable to PS Business Parks, Inc.

 

155,037 

 

 

128,029 

 

 

130,475 

448,759 

173,547 

174,966 

Allocation to preferred shareholders based upon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to preferred stockholders based upon

Distributions

 

(52,873)

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

(59,398)

(46,624)

(48,186)

(54,346)

Redemptions (Note 10)

 

(10,978)

 

 

(7,312)

 

 

(2,487)

Preferred securities redemption charge (Note 9)

(6,434)

(11,007)

Allocation to restricted stock unit holders

 

(761)

 

 

(569)

 

 

(299)

(2,613)

(716)

(910)

Net income allocable to common shareholders

$

90,425 

 

$

62,872 

 

$

68,291 

Net income allocable to common stockholders

$

393,088 

$

124,645 

$

108,703 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share of common stock

Basic

$

3.32 

 

$

2.32 

 

$

2.53 

$

14.28 

$

4.54 

$

3.96 

Diluted

$

3.30 

 

$

2.31 

 

$

2.52 

$

14.22 

$

4.52 

$

3.95 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common stock outstanding

Basic

 

27,207 

 

 

27,089 

 

 

26,973 

27,534 

27,475 

27,418 

Diluted

 

27,412 

 

 

27,179 

 

 

27,051 

27,636 

27,563 

27,526 

See accompanying notes.

44

57


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(InAmounts in thousands, except share data)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total PS

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business Parks,

 

 

 

 

 

 



Preferred Stock

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Inc.’s Shareholders’

 

Noncontrolling

 

Total

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings (Deficit)

 

Equity

 

Interests

 

Equity

Balances at December 31, 2014

39,800 

 

$

995,000 

 

26,919,161 

 

$

268 

 

$

709,008 

 

$

9,005 

 

$

1,713,281 

 

$

194,928 

 

$

1,908,209 

Redemption of preferred stock,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

net of issuance costs

(3,000)

 

 

(75,000)

 

 

 

 

 

2,487 

 

 

(2,487)

 

 

(75,000)

 

 

 

 

(75,000)

Issuance of common stock in connection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with stock-based compensation

 

 

 

114,912 

 

 

 

 

5,088 

 

 

 

 

5,089 

 

 

 

 

5,089 

Stock compensation, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,178 

 

 

 

 

8,178 

 

 

 

 

8,178 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

130,475 

 

 

130,475 

 

 

18,495 

 

 

148,970 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(59,398)

 

 

(59,398)

 

 

 

 

(59,398)

Common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(59,377)

 

 

(59,377)

 

 

 

 

(59,377)

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,072)

 

 

(16,072)

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in the OP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,752)

 

 

 

 

(2,752)

 

 

2,752 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2015

36,800 

 

 

920,000 

 

27,034,073 

 

 

269 

 

 

722,009 

 

 

18,218 

 

 

1,660,496 

 

 

200,103 

 

 

1,860,599 

Cumulative effect of a change in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

accounting principle (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

807 

 

 

(807)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of preferred stock,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

net of issuance costs

7,590 

 

 

189,750 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,434)

 

 

 

 

183,316 

 

 

 

 

183,316 

Redemption of preferred stock,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

net of issuance costs

(9,200)

 

 

(230,000)

 

 

 

 

 

7,312 

 

 

(7,312)

 

 

(230,000)

 

 

 

 

(230,000)

Issuance of common stock in connection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with stock-based compensation

 

 

 

104,065 

 

 

 

 

3,886 

 

 

 

 

3,888 

 

 

 

 

3,888 

Stock compensation, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,404 

 

 

 

 

8,404 

 

 

 

 

8,404 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

128,029 

 

 

128,029 

 

 

16,955 

 

 

144,984 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

 

 

(57,276)

Common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(81,285)

 

 

(81,285)

 

 

 

 

(81,285)

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21,916)

 

 

(21,916)

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in the OP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,313)

 

 

 

 

(2,313)

 

 

2,313 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2016

35,190 

 

 

879,750 

 

27,138,138 

 

 

271 

 

 

733,671 

 

 

(433)

 

 

1,613,259 

 

 

197,455 

 

 

1,810,714 

Issuance of preferred stock,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

net of issuance costs

17,200 

 

 

430,000 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,221)

 

 

 

 

415,779 

 

 

 

 

415,779 

Redemption of preferred stock,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

net of issuance costs

(14,000)

 

 

(350,000)

 

 

 

 

 

10,978 

 

 

(10,978)

 

 

(350,000)

 

 

 

 

(350,000)

Issuance of common stock in connection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with stock-based compensation

 

 

 

116,469 

 

 

 

 

4,217 

 

 

 

 

4,218 

 

 

 

 

4,218 

Stock compensation, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,016 

 

 

 

 

4,016 

 

 

 

 

4,016 

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of shares upon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,865)

 

 

 

 

(3,865)

 

 

 

 

(3,865)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

155,037 

 

 

155,037 

 

 

24,279 

 

 

179,316 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(52,873)

 

 

(52,873)

 

 

 

 

(52,873)

Common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92,531)

 

 

(92,531)

 

 

 

 

(92,531)

Noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24,838)

 

 

(24,838)

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in the OP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

271 

 

 

 

 

271 

 

 

(271)

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2017

38,390 

 

$

959,750 

 

27,254,607 

 

$

272 

 

$

735,067 

 

$

(1,778)

 

$

1,693,311 

 

$

196,625 

 

$

1,889,936 

Total PS

Business Parks,

Preferred Stock

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Inc.’s Stockholders’

Noncontrolling

Total

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Earnings

Equity

Interests

Equity

Balances at December 31, 2018

38,390

$

959,750

27,362,101

$

274

$

736,131

$

69,207

$

1,765,362

$

218,091

$

1,983,453

Issuance of preferred stock,

net of issuance costs

13,000

325,000

(8,962)

316,038

316,038

Redemption of preferred stock,

net of issuance costs

(13,600)

(340,000)

11,007

(11,007)

(340,000)

(340,000)

Issuance of common stock in connection

with stock-based compensation

78,852

969

969

969

Stock-based compensation, net

4,046

4,046

4,046

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of stock upon

vesting of restricted stock units

(6,350)

(6,350)

(6,350)

Net income

174,966

174,966

29,006

203,972

Distributions

Preferred stock (Note 9)

(54,346)

(54,346)

(54,346)

Common stock ($4.20)

(115,154)

(115,154)

(115,154)

Noncontrolling interests—

Common units

(30,683)

(30,683)

Joint venture

(134)

(134)

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests—

common units in the OP

145

145

(145)

Balances at December 31, 2019

37,790

944,750

27,440,953

274

736,986

63,666

1,745,676

216,135

1,961,811

Issuance of common stock in connection

with stock-based compensation

47,594

258

258

258

Stock-based compensation, net

4,994

4,994

4,994

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of stock upon

vesting of restricted stock units

(4,216)

(4,216)

(4,216)

Capital contribution from non controlling

interests - joint venture (Note 4)

493

493

Net income

173,547

173,547

33,158

206,705

Distributions

Preferred stock (Note 9)

(48,186)

(48,186)

(48,186)

Common stock ($4.20)

(115,396)

(115,396)

(115,396)

Noncontrolling interests—

Common units

(30,683)

(30,683)

Joint venture

(140)

(140)

Balances at December 31, 2020

37,790

944,750

27,488,547

274

738,022

73,631

1,756,677

218,963

1,975,640

Redemption of preferred stock,

net of issuance costs

(7,590)

(189,750)

6,434

(6,434)

(189,750)

(189,750)

Issuance of common stock in connection

with stock-based compensation

101,260

1

5,011

5,012

5,012

Stock-based compensation, net

7,022

7,022

7,022

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of stock upon

vesting of restricted stock units

(3,940)

(3,940)

(3,940)

Capital contribution from non controlling

interests - joint venture (Note 4)

746

746

Issuance costs

(105)

(105)

(105)

Net income

448,759

448,759

104,270

553,029

Distributions

Preferred stock (Note 9)

(46,624)

(46,624)

(46,624)

Common stock ($8.80)

(242,595)

(242,595)

(242,595)

Noncontrolling interests—

Common units

(64,287)

(64,287)

Joint venture

(77)

(77)

Balances at December 31, 2021

30,200

$

755,000

27,589,807

$

275

$

752,444

$

226,737

$

1,734,456

$

259,615

$

1,994,071

See accompanying notes.

45

58


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(InAmounts in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

179,316 

 

$

144,984 

 

$

148,970 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

94,270 

 

 

99,486 

 

 

105,394 

Tenant improvement reimbursements, net of lease incentives

 

(2,183)

 

 

(1,666)

 

 

(1,861)

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint venture

 

805 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

 

(1,209)

 

 

 

 

(28,235)

Gain on sale of development rights

 

(6,365)

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation

 

4,777 

 

 

10,913 

 

 

9,245 

Amortization of financing costs

 

475 

 

 

523 

 

 

706 

Other, net

 

1,728 

 

 

(3,733)

 

 

4,620 

Total adjustments

 

92,298 

 

 

105,523 

 

 

89,869 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

271,614 

 

 

250,507 

 

 

238,839 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures to real estate facilities

 

(50,219)

 

 

(31,877)

 

 

(43,654)

Capital expenditures to land and building held for development

 

(1,549)

 

 

(49)

 

 

(2,809)

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

 

(34,513)

 

 

(40,454)

 

 

(5,566)

Acquisition of real estate facilities

 

 

 

(12,628)

 

 

Proceeds from sale of real estate facilities

 

2,144 

 

 

 

 

55,160 

Proceeds from sale of development rights

 

4,900 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(79,237)

 

 

(85,008)

 

 

3,131 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

 

4,218 

 

 

3,888 

 

 

5,089 

Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock

 

415,779 

 

 

183,316 

 

 

Redemption of preferred stock

 

(450,000)

 

 

 

 

(75,000)

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of shares upon vesting of restricted stock units

 

(3,865)

 

 

(1,940)

 

 

(767)

Cash paid to restricted stock unit holders

 

(761)

 

 

(569)

 

 

Distributions paid to preferred shareholders

 

(52,180)

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

(59,398)

Distributions paid to common shareholders

 

(92,531)

 

 

(81,285)

 

 

(59,377)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests

 

(24,838)

 

 

(21,916)

 

 

(16,072)

Borrowings on credit facility

 

250,000 

 

 

116,000 

 

 

Repayment of borrowings on credit facility

 

(250,000)

 

 

(116,000)

 

 

Repayment of mortgage note payable

 

 

 

(250,000)

 

 

Payment of financing costs

 

(858)

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(205,036)

 

 

(225,782)

 

 

(205,525)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(12,659)

 

 

(60,283)

 

 

36,445 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period

 

128,629 

 

 

188,912 

 

 

152,467 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period

$

115,970 

 

$

128,629 

 

$

188,912 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

$

1,188 

 

$

7,395 

 

$

14,197 

For the Years Ended December 31,

2021

2020

2019

Cash flows from operating activities

Net income

$

553,029 

$

206,705 

$

203,972 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

operating activities

Depreciation and amortization expense

93,486 

96,314 

104,249 

Straight-line rent and amortization of lease intangibles, net

(2,800)

(4,713)

(3,936)

Gain on sale of real estate facilities

(359,875)

(27,273)

(16,644)

Stock compensation expense

8,495 

5,648 

4,956 

Amortization of financing costs

725 

548 

544 

Other, net

9,177 

(254)

(2,546)

Total adjustments

(250,792)

70,270 

86,623 

Net cash provided by operating activities

302,237 

276,975 

290,595 

Cash flows from investing activities

Capital expenditures to real estate facilities

(37,840)

(36,062)

(39,365)

Capital expenditures to land and building held for development, net

(46,047)

(16,412)

(5,278)

Acquisition of real estate facilities

(147,702)

(60,019)

(134,278)

Proceeds from sale of real estate facilities

400,955 

40,674 

144,599 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

169,366 

(71,819)

(34,322)

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from borrowings on credit facility

32,000 

70,000 

Repayment of borrowings on credit facility

(70,000)

Payment of deferred financing costs

(2,248)

Payment of financing costs

(246)

(335)

(296)

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

5,012 

258 

969 

Payment of issuance costs

(105)

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

(3,940)

(4,216)

(6,350)

Redemption of preferred stock

(189,750)

(340,000)

Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock

316,038 

Capital contribution from noncontrolling interests - joint venture

746 

493 

Cash paid to restricted stock unit holders

(1,498)

(654)

(910)

Distributions paid to preferred stockholders

(46,624)

(48,186)

(54,346)

Distributions paid to common stockholders

(242,595)

(115,396)

(115,154)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests—common units

(64,287)

(30,683)

(30,683)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests—joint venture

(77)

(140)

(134)

Net cash used in financing activities

(513,612)

(198,859)

(230,866)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(42,009)

6,297 

25,407 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period

70,171 

63,874 

38,467 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period

$

28,162 

$

70,171 

$

63,874 

Supplemental disclosures

Interest paid

$

$

$

67 

See accompanying notes.

46

59


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(InAmounts in thousands)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests in OP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests

$

(271)

 

$

2,313 

 

$

2,752 

Paid-in capital

$

271 

 

$

(2,313)

 

$

(2,752)

Preferred redemption allocation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

10,978 

 

$

7,312 

 

$

2,487 

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

$

(10,978)

 

$

(7,312)

 

$

(2,487)

Preferred stock called for redemption

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock called for redemption and reclassified to liabilities

$

130,000 

 

$

230,000 

 

$

 —

Preferred stock called for redemption and reclassified from equity

$

(130,000)

 

$

(230,000)

 

$

 —

Accrued preferred stock distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued and other liabilities

$

693 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

$

(693)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Transfer to land and building held for development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

$

 

$

(9,676)

 

$

 —

Buildings and improvements

$

 

$

(19,092)

 

$

 —

Accumulated depreciation

$

 

$

7,870 

 

$

 —

Land and building held for development

$

 

$

20,898 

 

$

 —

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

 

$

807 

 

$

 —

Accumulated earnings (deficit)

$

 

$

(807)

 

$

 —

Transfer to investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and building held for development

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(21,170)

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

$

 

$

 

$

21,170 

For the Years Ended December 31,

2021

2020

2019

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities

Adjustment to noncontrolling interests—common units in the OP

Noncontrolling interests—common units

$

$

$

(145)

Paid-in capital

$

$

$

145 

Preferred redemption allocation

Paid-in capital

$

6,434 

$

$

11,007 

Accumulated earnings

$

(6,434)

$

$

(11,007)

Accrued capital expenditures to land and building held for development

Land and building held for development, net

$

5,746 

$

1,698 

$

Accrued and other liabilities

$

(5,746)

$

(1,698)

$

See accompanying notes.

47

60


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 20172021

1. Organization and description of business

Organization

PS Business Parks, Inc. (“PSB”), a Maryland corporation, was incorporatedorganized in 1990. Effective May19,2021, following approval by its common and preferred stockholders, PSB reincorporated from the state of California in 1990. to the state of Maryland. As of December 31, 2017,2021, PSB owned 78.9%79.1% of the common partnership units of PS Business Parks, L.P. (the “OP”). The remaining common partnership units are owned by Public Storage (“PS”). PS’s interest in the OP is referred to as the “PS OP Interest.Interests.” PSB, as the sole general partner of the OP, has full, exclusive, and complete responsibility and discretion in managing and controlling the OP. PSB and its subsidiaries, including the OP and its consolidated joint ventures, are collectively referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our.” PS also owns 7.2 million shares of common stock and would own 41.9%41.4% (or 14.5 million shares) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock if it redeemed its common partnership units for shares of common shares. stock.

Description of business

The Company is a fully-integrated, self-advised and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that owns, operates, acquires, and develops commercial properties, primarily multi-tenant flex,industrial, industrial-flex and low-rise suburban office and industrial space. As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company owned and operated 28.027.7 million rentable square feet of commercial space in six6 states comprising 97 parks and 666 buildings. The Company also held a 95.0% interest in a joint venture entity which owns Highgate at The Mile, a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex.complex located in Tysons, Virginia, and a 98.2% interest in a joint venture formed to develop Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex also located in Tysons, Virginia. The Company also manages 684,000for a fee approximately 0.3 million rentable square feet on behalf of PS.

References herein to the number of properties, parks, apartment units or square footage are unaudited and outside the scope of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm's auditfirm’s review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

2. SummaryBasis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PSB and its subsidiaries, including the OP.OP and its consolidated joint ventures. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The financial statements are presented on an accrual basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Consolidation and equity method of accounting

We consider entities to be Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) when they have insufficient equity to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties, or the equity holders as a group do not have a controlling financial interest. A limited partnership is also generally considered a VIE if the limited partners do not participate in operating decisions. We consolidate VIEs when we are the primary beneficiary, generally defined as having (i) the power to direct the activities most significantly impacting economic performance and (ii) either the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE.

We account for investments in entities that are not VIEs that we have significant influence over, but do not control, using the equity method of accounting. Ataccounting and for investment in entities that we control, we consolidate. We do not consider the joint venture entity that owns Highgate at The Mile a VIE, but we consolidate the entity as the Company has control over the joint venture. See Note 3 for more information relating to this joint venture arrangement.

61


We have a 98.2% interest in Brentford at The Mile, a planned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex (the “Brentford Joint Venture”). An unrelated real estate development company (the “JV Partner”) holds the remaining 1.8% interest. Based on management’s analysis of the joint venture and certain related agreements, we determined Brentford Joint Venture is a VIE because (a) Brentford Joint Venture does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, and (b) there are no substantive kick-out rights. We have also concluded we have control over the Brentford Joint Venture as we (a) are the managing member of the Brentford Joint Venture, (b) have designated decision making power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the Brentford Joint Venture, and (c) have a 98.2% economic interest in the investment. Thus, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of Brentford Joint Venture. As such, we consolidate the Brentford Joint Venture, and the related land and development costs of $59.9 million and $15.1 million were included in land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, we2021 and 2020, respectively. The assets of the Brentford Joint Venture may only be used to settle obligations of the Brentford Joint Venture and the creditors of the Brentford Joint Venture have an interest in a joint venture engaged inno recourse to the development and operationgeneral credit of residential real estate, which we account for using the equity method of accounting.Company. See Note 4 for more information onrelating to this entity.joint venture arrangement.

PS, the sole limited partner in the OP, has no power to direct the activities of the OP. We arePSB is the primary beneficiary and has control over the OP as it has the exclusive responsibility under the Operating Partnership Agreement to manage and conduct the business of the OP. Accordingly, we consider the OP a VIE and consolidate it. Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are held by the OP.

48


Noncontrolling interests

The PS OP Interest representsNoncontrolling interests represent (i) PS’s noncontrolling interest in the OP through its ownership of 7,305,355 common partnership units.units, (ii) the JV Partner’s 5.0% interest in our consolidated joint venture that owns Highgate at The Mile, and (iii) the JV Partner’s 1.8% interest in our consolidated joint venture formed to develop Brentford at The Mile. See Note 87 for further information on noncontrolling interests.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company monitors the collectability of its receivable balances including the deferred rent receivable on an ongoing basis. Customer receivables are net of an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts totaling $400,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Deferred rent receivable is net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts totaling $867,000 and $916,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Financial instruments

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are described below. The Company has estimated the fair value of financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of market value. Accordingly, estimated fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in current market exchanges. The Company determines the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities utilizing a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or unobservable in a marketplace. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The following is the fair value hierarchy:

·Level 1—quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

·Level 2—quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

·Level  3—fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

Level 1—quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Level 2—quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3—fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

Financial assets that are exposed to credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and receivables. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash

62


equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents, which consist primarily of money market investments, are only invested in entities with an investment grade rating. Receivables are comprised of balances due from a large number ofvarious customers. Balances that the Company expects to become uncollectible are reserved for or written off. Due to the short period to maturity of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets and accrued and other liabilities, the carrying values as presented on the consolidated balance sheets are reasonable estimates of fair value.

49Carrying values of the Company’s Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6) approximate fair value. The characteristics of the Credit Facility, market data and other comparative metrics utilized in determining these fair values are “Level 2” inputs.


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash per the consolidated statements of cash flow to the corresponding financial statement line items in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015 2019 (in thousands):

For the Years Ended December 31,

2021

2020

2019

Consolidated balance sheets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

27,074 

$

69,083 

$

62,786 

Restricted cash included in

Land and building held for development, net (1)

1,088 

1,088 

1,088 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

at the end of the period

$

28,162 

$

70,171 

$

63,874 

____________________________



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For The Years Ended December 31,



2017

 

2016

 

2015

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

114,882 

 

$

128,629 

 

$

188,912 

Restricted Cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and building held for development

 

1,088 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

$

115,970 

 

$

128,629 

 

$

188,912 

During 2017, in(1)In conjunction with seeking entitlements to develop our multi-familymultifamily projects in Tysons, Virginia, we contributed $1.1 million into an escrow account for the future development of an athletic field.

Carrying values of the Company’s unsecured Credit Facility (as defined on page 60) approximate fair value. The characteristics of these financial instruments, market data and other comparative metrics utilized in determining these fair values are “Level 2” inputs.

Real estate facilities

Real estate facilities are recorded at cost. Property taxes, insurance, interest and costs essential to the development of property for its intended use are capitalized during the period of development. Costs related to the renovation or improvement of the properties are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that are expected to benefit a period greater than two years and exceed $2,000 are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life. Buildings and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from five to 30 years. Transaction costs, which include tenant improvements and lease commissions, of $1,000 or more for leases with terms greater than one year are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Transaction costs less than $1,000 or for leases of one year or less are expensed as incurred.

Property held for disposition or development

Real estate This amount is classified as held for disposition when the asset is being marketed for sale and we expect that a sale is likely to occurreflected in the next 12 months. Real estate is classifiedtable above as restricted cash included in land and building held for development, when it is likely that it will be developed to an alternate use and no longer used in its present form. Property held for development or disposition is not depreciated.net.

Intangible assets/liabilities

When we acquire real estate facilities, an intangible asset is recorded in other assets for leases where the in-place rent is higher than market rents, and an intangible liability is recorded in other liabilities where the market rents are higher than the in-place rents. The amounts recorded are based upon the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of such differences over the lease term and such amounts are amortized to rental income over the respective remaining lease term.

We have no material As of December 31, 2021, the value of above-market in-place rents resulted in net intangible assets orof $0.6 million, net of $11.6 million of accumulated amortization, and the value of below-market in-place rents resulted in net intangible liabilities of $2.8 million, net of $13.1 million of accumulated amortization. As of December 31, 2020, the value of above-market in-place rents resulted in net intangible assets of $1.2 million, net of $11.1 million of accumulated amortization, and the value of below-market in-place rents resulted in net intangible liabilities of $2.2 million, net of $12.2 million of accumulated amortization.

Additionally, when we acquire real estate facilities, the value of in-place lease intangible (i.e., customer lease-up costs) is recorded in other assets and is amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the respective remaining lease term. As of December 31, 2021, the value of acquired in-place leases resulted in net intangible assets of $6.0 million, net of $10.5 million of accumulated amortization. As of December 31, 2020, the value of acquired in-place leases resulted in net intangible assets of $5.3 million, net of $7.2 million of accumulated amortization.

As of December 31, 2021, the value of our right-of-use (“ROU”) assets relating to our existing ground lease arrangements, included in “other assets” on our consolidated balance sheets and the corresponding liability included under “accrued and other liabilities,” was $1.3 million, net of $0.3 million of accumulated amortization. As of December 31, 2020, the value of our ROU assets and related liability relating to our ground lease arrangements was $1.5 million, net of $0.2 million of accumulated amortization. The ground leases expire in 2029 and 2030 and do not have options to extend. As of December 31, 2021, the remaining lease terms were 7.8 years and 8.1 years. Lease expense for any periods presented.these ground leases is recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred, and the monthly lease amount for these operating leases is constant and without contractual increases throughout the remaining terms.


50

63


Real estate facilities

Real estate facilities are recorded at cost. Property taxes, insurance, interest, and costs essential to the development of property for its intended use are capitalized during the period of development. Direct costs related to the renovation or improvement of the properties are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that are expected to provide benefit for a period greater than two years are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful life. Buildings and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from five to 30 years. Transaction costs, which include tenant improvements and lease commissions, for leases with terms greater than one year are capitalized and depreciated over the corresponding lease term.

Property held for development

Property is classified as held for development when it is no longer used in its original form and it will be developed to an alternate use. Property held for development is not depreciated.

Property held for sale

Property is classified as held for sale when all of the following criteria for a plan of sale have been met: (i) management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the property; (ii) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customary; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the property is probable and is expected to be completed within one year; (v) the property is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions necessary to complete the plan of sale indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation of assets ceases upon designation of a property as held for sale.

If the disposal of a property represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations or financial results, such as (i) a major line of business, (ii) a major geographic area, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity, then the operations of the property, including any interest expense directly attributable to it, are classified as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations, and amounts for all prior periods presented are reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations. The disposal of an individual property generally will not represent a strategic shift and therefore will typically not meet the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation.

Sales of real estate facilities

Sales of real estate facilities are not part of our ordinary activities, and as a result, we consider such sales as contracts with non-customers. We recognize sales of real estate when we have collected payment and the attributes of ownership, such as possession and control of the asset, have been transferred to the buyer. If a contract for sale includes obligations to provide goods or services to the buyer, an allocated portion of the contract price is recognized as revenue as the related goods or services are transferred to the buyer.  

Evaluation of asset impairment

We evaluate our real estate and finite-lived intangible assets for impairment each quarter. We review current activities and changes in the business conditions of all of our long-lived assets to determine the existence of any triggering events or impairment indicators requiring an impairment analysis. If theretriggering events or impairment indicators are indicatorsidentified, we review an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration.


64


Upon determination that an impairment and we determinehas occurred, a write-down is recognized to reduce the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value. If an impairment charge is not required to be recognized, the recognition of depreciation or amortization is adjusted prospectively, as necessary, to reduce the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated disposition value over the remaining period that the asset is not recoverable from future undiscounted cash flowsexpected to be received through the asset’s remaining life (or, if earlier, theheld and used. We may adjust depreciation of properties that are expected disposal date), we record an impairment chargeto be disposed of or redeveloped prior to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value or net proceeds from expected disposal.end of their useful lives.

We evaluate our investment in our unconsolidated joint venture on a quarterly basis. We record anNaN impairment charge to the extent the carrying amount exceeds estimated fair value, when we believe any such shortfall is other than temporary.

No impairmentscharges were recorded in any of our evaluations for any period presented herein.

Asset impairment due to casualty loss

It is our policy to record losses due to physical damages during the accounting period in which they occur, while the amount of monetary assets to be received from the insurance policy, if any, is recognized when receipt of insurance recoveries is probable. Losses, which are reduced by the related probable insurance recoveries, are recorded as costs of operations on the consolidated statements of income. Anticipated proceeds in excess of recognized losses would be considered a gain contingency and recognized when the contingency related to the insurance claim has been resolved. Anticipated recoveries for lost rental income due to property damages are also considered to be a gain contingency and recognized when the contingency related to the insurance claim has been resolved.

No material casualty losses were incurred forin any period presented herein.

StockStock-based compensation

All share-basedStock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as stock compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of income based on their grant date fair values, except for performance-based grants, which are accounted for based on their fair values at the beginning of the service period. See Note 11.10.

Accrued and other liabilities and other assets

Accrued and other liabilities consist primarily of rents prepaid by our customers, trade payables, property tax accruals, accrued payroll and contingent loss accruals when probable and estimable.estimable, as well as the intangible liabilities discussed above. We disclose the nature of significant unaccrued losses not accrued that are reasonably possible of occurring and, if estimable, a range of exposure. Other assets are comprised primarily of prepaid expenses. We believe theThe fair value of our accrued and other liabilities and other assets approximate book value due to the short period until settlement.

Other assets

Other assets are comprised primarily of prepaid expenses, as well as the intangible assets discussed above.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized with respectWe recognize the aggregate rent to contractual arrangements when persuasive evidencebe collected (including the impact of an arrangement exists;escalators and concessions) under leases ratably throughout the delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. All leases are classified as operating leases. Rental income is recognizednon-cancellable lease term on a “straight-line” basis, commencing when the customer takes control of the leased space. Cumulative straight-line basis overrent recognized in excess of amounts billed per the lease term with the excess of cumulative rental income recognized over the cumulative rent billed for the lease term reflectedis presented as “deferred rent receivable” on our consolidated balance sheets. ReimbursementsThe Company presents reimbursements from customers for real estate taxes and other recoverable operating expenses under a single lease component presentation as the timing and pattern of transfer of such reimbursements are recognizedthe same as base rent, and the combined single component of such leases are classified as operating leases. Accordingly, the Company recognizes such variable lease payments resulting from the reimbursements from customers for real estate taxes and other recoverable operating expenses as rental income in the period the applicable costs are incurred. Property management fees are recognized in the period earned.earned as other income.

Costs incurred in acquiring customers (primarily tenant improvements and lease commissions) are capitalized and amortized over the lease period.

51

65


Gains from sales of real estate facilities

The Company recognizes gainsmonitors the collectability of its receivable balances, including deferred rent receivable balances, on an ongoing basis. The Company writes off uncollectible customer receivable balances, including deferred rent receivable balances, as a reduction to rental income in the period such balances are no longer probable of being collected. Therefore, recognition of rental income is limited to the lesser of the amount of cash collected or rental income reflected on a “straight-line” basis, plus any accruable variable lease payments for those customer receivable balances. The Company wrote-off accounts receivable, net of recoveries of $0.1 million, $1.6 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, and wrote off deferred rent receivable of $0.3 million, $3.1 million, and $0.5 million, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The Company recognized revenue from salesits lease arrangements aggregating to $438.7 million, $415.6 million, and $429.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. This revenue consisted primarily of real estate facilitiesrental income from operating leases and the related variable lease payments resulting from reimbursements of property operating expenses. Base rental income was $333.9 million, $319.2 million, and $333.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, while variable lease payments, consisting primarily of reimbursement of property operating expenses, were $104.8 million, $96.4 million, and $96.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company agreed to defer $0.5 million and abate $0.3 million of billed rental income, which was significantly lower than the $5.7 million of rent deferrals and $1.3 million of rent abatements granted during the year ended December 31, 2020. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company entered into rent relief agreements consisting of $6.2 million of rent deferrals and $1.6 million of rent abatements. As of December 31, 2021, the 317 current customers that received rent relief account for 9.5% of rental income. Also as of December 31, 2021, the Company had collected $5.3 million of rent deferral repayment, representing 99.8% of the amounts scheduled to be repaid through December 2021. An additional $0.9 million of rent deferral repayment is scheduled to be repaid thereafter. The duration and severity of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy are uncertain and are likely to impact collectability of certain customers’ rent receivable balances in the future. The Company has taken into account the current financial condition of its tenants, including consideration of COVID-19 impacts, in its estimation of its uncollectible accounts and deferred rents receivable at December 31, 2021. The Company is closely monitoring the timecollectability of sale usingsuch rents and will adjust future estimations as appropriate as further information becomes known.

In April 2020, the full accrual method, provided that various criteriaFinancial Accounting Standards Board issued a Staff Question-and-Answer (“Lease Modification Q&A”) to respond to frequently asked questions about accounting for lease concessions related to the termscoronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic. Under existing lease guidance, an entity would have to determine, on a lease by lease basis, if a lease concession contained a lease modification which would be accounted for under the lease modification framework, or if a lease concession was an enforceable right or obligation that existed in the original lease, which would be accounted for outside the lease modification framework. The Lease Modification Q&A provides that, to the extent that cash flow after the lease concessions are substantially the same, or less than, the cash flow previously required by the existing lease, an entity is not required to evaluate each contract to determine whether a concession provided by a lessor to a lessee in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is a lease modification. Instead, an entity can account for such lease concessions either (i) as if they were part of the transactionsenforceable rights and any subsequent involvementobligations of the parties under the existing lease contract; or (ii) as a lease modification. Based on the Lease Modification Q&A, an entity is not required to account for all lease concessions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic under one elected option; however, the entity is required to apply the elected option consistently to leases with similar characteristics and in similar circumstances.

In accordance with the Lease Modification Q&A, the Company has elected to account for lease concessions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic as a lease modification if the cash flow after these lease concessions is substantially the same, or less than, the cash flow previously required by the existing lease. The Company withrecords rent deferrals and rent abatements in deferred rent receivable in the properties sold are met. Ifaccompanying consolidated balance sheets and will recognize these amounts over the criteria are not met,remainder of the respective lease terms. For lease concessions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that modified the terms and substantially changed the underlying cash flow of the existing lease for the remaining term, the Company defers the gains and recognizes them when the criteria are met or uses the installment or cost recovery methodsalso accounts for such concessions as appropriate under the circumstances.a lease modification.


66


General and administrative expensesexpense

General and administrative expenses includeexpense includes executive and other compensation, corporate office expenses, professional fees, acquisition transaction costs, state income taxes and other such costs that are not directly related to the operation of our real estate facilities.

Income taxes

We have elected to be treated as a REIT, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a REIT, we do not incur U.S. federal corporate income tax if we distribute 100% ofall our “REIT taxable income” each year, and if we meet certain organizational and operational rules.requirements. We believe we have met these REIT requirements for all periods presented herein. Accordingly, we have recorded no0 U.S. federal corporate income tax expense related to our “REIT taxable income.”

We recognize tax benefits of uncertain income tax positions that are subject to audit only if we believe it is more likely than not that the position would ultimately be sustained assuming the relevant taxing authorities had full knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances of our positions. As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, we did not0t recognize any tax benefit for uncertain tax positions.

Accounting for preferred equity issuance costs

We record preferred equity issuance costs as a reduction to paid-in capital on our consolidated balance sheets at the time the preferred securities are issued and reflect the carrying value of the preferred equity at its redemption value. An additional allocation of income is made from the common shareholdersstockholders to the preferred shareholdersstockholders in the amount of the original issuance costs, and we reclassify the redemption value from equity to liabilities, when we call preferred sharesstock for redemption.redemption, with such liabilities relieved once the preferred stock is redeemed.

Net income per share of common sharestock

Notwithstanding the presentation of income allocations on our consolidated statements of income, net income is allocated to (a) preferred shareholders,stockholders, for distributions paid or payable, (b) preferred shareholders,stockholders, to the extent redemption value exceeds the related carrying value (a “Preferred(“Preferred Redemption Allocation”), (c) our joint venture partner in proportion to its percentage interest in the joint ventures, to the extent the consolidated joint ventures produce net income or loss during the period and (c)(d) restricted sharestock unit (“RSU”) holders, for non-forfeitable dividends paid adjusted for participation rights in undistributed earnings. The remaining net income is allocated to the common partnership units and our common shareholders,stockholders, respectively, based upon the pro-rata aggregate number of units and sharesstock outstanding.

Basic and diluted net income per share of common sharestock are each calculated based upon net income allocable to common shareholders,stockholders, divided by (i) in the case of basic net income per share of common share,stock, weighted average common sharesstock and (ii) in the case of diluted net income per share of common stock, weighted average common sharesstock adjusted for the impact if dilutive, of stock compensation awards outstanding (Note 11).(see Note 10) using the treasury stock method.


67


The following tables settable sets forth the calculation of the components of our basic and diluted net income per share that are not reflected on the face of our consolidated statements of income, including the allocation of income to common shareholdersstockholders and common partnership units, the percentage of weighted average sharescommon stock and common partnership units outstanding, as well as basic and diluted weighted average sharescommon stock outstanding for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):

2021

2020

2019

Calculation of net income allocable to common stockholders

Net income

$

553,029 

$

206,705 

$

203,972 

Net (income) loss allocated to

Preferred stockholders based upon distributions

(46,624)

(48,186)

(54,346)

Preferred stockholders based upon redemptions

(6,434)

(11,007)

Noncontrolling interests—joint venture

20 

(17)

(44)

Restricted stock unit holders

(2,613)

(716)

(910)

Net income allocable to common stockholders

and noncontrolling interests—common units

497,378 

157,786 

137,665 

Net income allocation to noncontrolling interests—

common units

(104,290)

(33,141)

(28,962)

Net income allocable to common stockholders

$

393,088 

$

124,645 

$

108,703 

Calculation of common partnership units as a percentage of common stock equivalents

Weighted average common stock outstanding

27,534 

27,475 

27,418 

Weighted average common partnership units outstanding

7,305 

7,305 

7,305 

Total common stock equivalents

34,839 

34,780 

34,723 

Common partnership units as a percentage of common

stock equivalents

21.0%

21.0%

21.0%

Weighted average common stock outstanding

Basic weighted average common stock outstanding

27,534 

27,475 

27,418 

Net effect of dilutive stock compensationbased on

treasury stock method using average market price

102 

88 

108 

Diluted weighted average common stock outstanding

27,636 

27,563 

27,526 

52




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Calculation of net income allocable to common shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

179,316 

 

$

144,984 

 

$

148,970 

Less net income allocated to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred shareholders based upon distributions

 

(52,873)

 

 

(57,276)

 

 

(59,398)

Preferred shareholders based upon redemptions

 

(10,978)

 

 

(7,312)

 

 

(2,487)

Restricted stock unit holders

 

(761)

 

 

(569)

 

 

(299)

Net income allocable to common shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and noncontrolling interests

 

114,704 

 

 

79,827 

 

 

86,786 

Net income allocation to noncontrolling interests

 

(24,279)

 

 

(16,955)

 

 

(18,495)

Net income allocable to common shareholders

$

90,425 

 

$

62,872 

 

$

68,291 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calculation of common partnership units as a percentage of common share equivalents

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

27,207 

 

 

27,089 

 

 

26,973 

Weighted average common partnership units outstanding

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

 

 

7,305 

Total common share equivalents

 

34,512 

 

 

34,394 

 

 

34,278 

Common partnership units as a percentage of common

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

share equivalents

 

21.2% 

 

 

21.2% 

 

 

21.3% 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

 

27,207 

 

 

27,089 

 

 

26,973 

Net effect of dilutive stock compensationbased on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

treasury stock method using average market price

 

205 

 

 

90 

 

 

78 

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 

27,412 

 

 

27,179 

 

 

27,051 

Segment reporting

The Company views its operationshas 2 operating segments: (i) the acquisition, development, ownership, and management of commercial real estate and (ii) the acquisition, development, ownership, and management of multifamily real estate, but has only 1 reportable segment as onethe multifamily segment does not meet the quantitative thresholds necessary to require reporting as a separate segment.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the consolidated financial statements for 2016 and 2015 in order2020 to conform to the 20172021 presentation, including reclassifying management fee income totaling $518,000 and $540,000assets held for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, into “interest and other income” on our consolidated statements of income.

Recently issued accounting standards – Revenue recognition and leases

In May 2014 and February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued two Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”s), ASU 2014-09, Revenuesale or sold during 2021 from Contracts with Customers (the “Revenue Standard”), and ASU 2016-02, Leases (the “Lease Standard”). These standards apply to substantially all of our revenue generating activities, as well as provide a model to account for the disposition of real“real estate facilities, to non-customers, which is governed under ASU 2017-05, clarifying the scopeat cost” of asset derecognition guidance and accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets.

The Lease Standard

The Lease Standard will direct how we account for payments from the elements of our leases that are generally fixed and determinable at the inception of the lease (“Fixed Lease Payments”) while the Revenue Standard will direct how we account for the non-lease components of our lease contracts, primarily expense reimbursements (“Non-Lease Payments”) and the accounting for the disposition of real estate facilities.

The Lease Standard is effective on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires us to identify Fixed Lease Payments and Non-Lease Payments of a lease agreement and will govern the recognition of revenue for the

53


Fixed Lease Payments. Revenue related to Non-Lease Payments under our lease arrangements will be subject to the Revenue Standard effective upon adoption of the Lease Standard. We expect to adopt the Lease Standard on January 1, 2019.

The Lease Standard requires a modified retrospective method for all leases existing at or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements on the date of initial application. Based on the required adoption date of January 1, 2019 for us, the modified retrospective method for the Lease Standard requires application of the standard to all leases that exist at, or commence after, January 1, 2017 (beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the 2019 financial statements), with a cumulative adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated earnings (deficit) on January 1, 2017, for the effect of applying the standard at the date of initial application, and restatement of the amounts presented prior to January 1, 2019.

The FASB has also issued a proposed amendment to the Lease Standard that would provide an entity an optional transition method to initially account for the impact of the adoption of the Lease Standard with a cumulative adjustment to accumulated earnings (deficit) on January 1, 2019 (the effective date of the Lease Standard), rather than January 1, 2017, which would eliminate the need to restate amounts presented prior to January 1, 2019.

Under the Lease Standard, an entity may elect a practical expedient package, which allows for (a) an entity need not to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; (b) an entity need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (c) an entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. These three practical expedients are available as a single election that must be elected as a package and must be consistently applied to all existing leases at the date of adoption. The FASB has also tentatively noted in Board meeting minutes of May, 2017 that lessors that adopt this package of practical expedients are not expected to reassess expired or existing leases at the date of initial application, which is January 1, 2017 under the Lease Standard, or January 1, 2019, if we elect the optional transition method. The FASB noted that the transition provisions generally enable entities to “run off” their existing leases for the remainder of the lease term, which would effectively eliminate the need to calculate adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated earnings (deficit).  

Lessor Accounting

We recognized revenue from our lease arrangements aggregating $402.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This revenue consisted primarily of rental income and expense reimbursements of $311.4$70.0 million and $90.8“land and building held for development, net” of $5.1 million respectively.

Under the current accounting standards, we are required to account for Fixed Lease Payments on a straight-line basis, with the expected fixed payments recognized ratably over the term of the lease. Payments for expense reimbursements received under these lease arrangements related to our customer’s pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, common area expense and other operating expenses are considered Fixed Lease Payments. We recognized these reimbursements as revenue when services are rendered in an amount equal to the related operating expenses incurred that are recoverable under the terms of the lease arrangements.

Under the Lease Standard, each lease agreement will be evaluated to identify the Fixed Lease Payments and Non-Lease Payments at lease inception. The total consideration in the lease agreement will be allocated to the Fixed Lease Payment and Non-Lease Payments based on their relative standalone selling prices. Lessors will continue to recognize the Fixed Lease Payments on a straight-line basis, which is consistent with existing guidance for operating leases. In January, 2018, the FASB issued a proposed amendment to the Lease Standard that would allow lessors to elect, as a practical expedient, not to allocate the total consideration to Fixed Lease Payments and Non-Lease Payments based on their relative standalone selling prices. If adopted, this practical expedient will allow lessors to elect a combined single component presentation if (i) the timing and pattern of the revenue recognition for the Fixed Lease Payments and Non-Lease Payments are the same, and (ii) the combined single component of the lease would continue to be classified as an operating lease.

We do not expect that the Lease Standard will impact our accounting for Fixed Lease Payments, because our accounting policy is currently consistent with the provisions of the standard. We are currently evaluating the impact of the standard as it relates to Non-Lease Payments. If the proposed practical expedient mentioned above is adopted and we elect it, we expect payments for expense reimbursements that qualify as Non-Lease Payments will be presented under a single lease component presentation. However, without the proposed practical expedient, we expect these reimbursements would be separated into Fixed Lease Payments and Non-Lease Payments. Under the Lease Standard, reimbursements relating to property taxes and

54


insurances are Fixed Lease Payments as the payments relates to the right to use the leased assets, while reimbursements relating to maintenance activities and common area expense are Non-Lease Payments and would be accounted under the Revenue Standard upon the adoption of the Lease Standard as these payments for goods or services are transferred separately from the right to use the underlying assets.

Expense reimbursements categorized as Fixed Lease Payments will generally be variable consideration with revenue recognized as the recoverable services are provided. Expense reimbursements categorized as Non-Lease Payments will be recognized at a point in time or over time based on the pattern of transfer of the underlying goods or services to our customers.

Costs to execute leases

The Lease Standard also requires capitalization of only the incremental costs incurred in executing each particular lease, such as legal fees to draft a lease or commissions based upon a particular lease. Costs that would have been incurred regardless of lease execution, such as allocated costs of internal personnel, are not capitalized. We do not capitalized such costs relating to the execution of leases and do not expect this standard to have a material impact on expenses as our accounting policy is consistent with the provisions of the standard.

Lessee accounting

Under the Lease Standard, lessees are required to apply a dual approach by classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle whether the lease is effectively a finance purchase of the lease asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For most leases with a term of greater than 12 months, in which we are the lessee, the present value of future lease payments will be recognized on our balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and related liability. As of December 31, 2017, the remaining contractual payments under our ground lease agreements aggregated $250,000. We are still evaluating the impact to our consolidated financial statement from the initial recognition of each lease liability upon the adoption and the pattern of recognition of ground lease expense subsequent to adoption.

The Revenue Standard

In May, 2014, the FASB issued the Revenue Standard on recognition of revenue arising from contracts with customers, as well as the accounting for the disposition of real estate facilities, and subsequently, issued additional guidance that further clarified the standard. Rental income from leasing arrangements is a substantial portion of our revenues and is specifically excluded from the Revenue Standard and will be governed by the Lease Standard (discussed above).

The core principle underlying this guidance is that entities will recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled for such exchange.

The Revenue Standard is effective on January 1, 2018. The standard permits either the full retrospective method or modified retrospective method and allowed for early adoption on January 1, 2017. We did not elect to early adopt the standard. Under the full retrospective method, all periods presented will be restated upon adoption to conform to the new standard and a cumulative adjustment for effects on the periods prior to 2016 will be recorded to accumulated earnings (deficit) as of January 1, 2016. Under the modified retrospective method, prior periods are not restated to conform to the new standard. Instead, a cumulative adjustment for effects of applying the new standard to periods prior to 2018 is recorded to accumulated earnings (deficit) as of January 1, 2018. Additionally, incremental footnote disclosures are required to present the 2018 revenues under the prior standards. Under the modified retrospective method, an entity may also elect to apply the standard to either (i) all contracts as of January 1, 2018, or (ii) only to contracts that are not completed as of January 1, 2018. We expect to use the modified retrospective method, which will result in an adjustment to our accumulated earnings (deficit) effective January 1, 2018 for the cumulative impact of the standard as of December 31, 2017. We further elected to apply the Revenue Standard only to contracts not completed as2020 into “properties held for sale, net” of January 1, 2018. We evaluated the revenue recognition for$75.1 million on our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, we combined all contractsnon-cash rental income items into “straight-line rent and amortization of lease intangibles, net” within the scopeoperating activities section of the Revenue Standard and confirmed that there were no differences in amounts recognized or the pattern of recognition.

55


Revenue within the scope of the Revenue Standard

Facility Management fees

We manage industrial, office and retail facilities for PS and receive a facility management fee based upon a percentage of revenues. Management fee revenues was $506,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. These management fees will be accounted for under the Revenue Standard effective January 1, 2018. Under the current accounting standards, we recognized these management fees when the amounts are fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonable assured, and services have been rendered. Under the Revenue Standard, the recognition of such management fees will occur when the services are provided and the performance obligations are satisfied. These services represent a single performance obligation recognized over time (monthly). Therefore, our accounting for our facility management fees for property management services provided to PS under the Revenue Standard is expected to be substantially similar to the recognition pattern under existing accounting standards as the series of distinct services are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer.

Disposition of Real Estate Facilities

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we sold a real estate facility and development rights for net proceeds of $8.5 million, which resulted in an aggregate gain of $7.5 million. Our ordinary output activities consist of leasing space to our customers in our operating properties, not the sale of real estate. Therefore, sales of real estate and development rights qualify as contracts with non-customers.

The amount and timing of recognition of gain or loss on those sales may differ significantly under the Revenue Standard. The current standard focuses on whether the seller retains substantial risks or rewards of ownership as a result of its continuing involvement with the sold property.

Under the Revenue Standard, which includes guidance on recognition of gains and losses arising from the derecognition of nonfinancial assets in a transaction with non-customers, the derecognition model is based on the transfer of control. If a real estate sale contract includes ongoing involvement by the seller with the property, the seller must evaluate each promised good or service under the contract to determine whether it represents a separate performance obligation, constitutes a guarantee, or prevents the transfer of control. If a good or service is considered a separate performance obligation, an allocated portion of the transaction price should be recognized as revenue as the entity transfers the related good or service to the buyer.

Under the current standards, a partial sale of real estate in which the seller retains a non-controlling interest results in the recognition of a gain or loss related to the interest sold.

Under the Revenue Standard, a partial sale of real estate in which the seller retains a non-controlling interest will result in recognition by the seller of a gain or loss as if 100% of the real estate was sold. Conversely, under the new standards, a partial sale of real estate in which the seller retains a controlling interest will result in the seller’s continuing to reflect the asset at its current book value, recording a non-controlling interest for the book value of the partial interest sold, and recognizing additional paid-in capital for the difference between the consideration received and the partial interest at book value, consistent with the current accounting standards.

Expense Reimbursements

As previously noted above in the lease accounting section, depending upon the nature of the underlying expense and the contractual reimbursement arrangement, certain expense reimbursements may be subject to the Revenue Standard upon our adoption of the Lease Standard, no later than January 1, 2019.

Other recently issued accounting standards

In August, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on the classification of certain specific cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows, including, but not limited to, cash distributions received from equity method investees, including unconsolidated joint ventures. The new standard is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and

56


shall be applied retrospectively where practicable. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash, which requires the statements of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The new guidance also requires entities to reconcile such total to amounts on the balance sheets and disclose the nature of the restrictions. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this standard effective December 31, 2017.  The guidance must be adopted using a retrospective approach. The impact on our consolidated statements of cash flow is described aboveflows for all periods presented herein.

68


3. Real estate facilities

The activity inActivity related to our real estate facilities for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 20152019 is as follows (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Buildings and

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Depreciation

 

Total

Balances at December 31, 2014

$

774,348 

 

$

2,087,412 

 

$

(928,093)

 

$

1,933,667 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

46,777 

 

 

 

 

46,777 

Disposals

 

 

 

(13,990)

 

 

13,990 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(105,394)

 

 

(105,394)

Transfer to properties held for disposition

 

 

 

(1,651)

 

 

2,878 

 

 

1,227 

Balances at December 31, 2015

 

774,348 

 

 

2,118,548 

 

 

(1,016,619)

 

 

1,876,277 

Acquisition of real estate facilities

 

5,638 

 

 

7,637 

 

 

 

 

13,275 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

37,232 

 

 

 

 

37,232 

Disposals

 

 

 

(14,411)

 

 

14,411 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(99,486)

 

 

(99,486)

Transfer to land and building held for development

 

(9,676)

 

 

(19,092)

 

 

7,870 

 

 

(20,898)

Transfer to properties held for disposition

 

 

 

(1,086)

 

 

2,845 

 

 

1,759 

Balances at December 31, 2016

 

770,310 

 

 

2,128,828 

 

 

(1,090,979)

 

 

1,808,159 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

51,909 

 

 

 

 

51,909 

Disposals

 

 

 

(13,919)

 

 

13,919 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(94,270)

 

 

(94,270)

Transfer to properties held for disposition

 

 

 

(239)

 

 

2,350 

 

 

2,111 

Balances at December 31, 2017

$

770,310 

 

$

2,166,579 

 

$

(1,168,980)

 

$

1,767,909 

Buildings and

Accumulated

Land

Improvements

Depreciation

Total

Balances at December 31, 2018

$

725,411 

$

1,973,658 

$

(968,680)

$

1,730,389 

Acquisition of real estate facilities

88,093 

44,313 

132,406 

Capital expenditures

40,092 

40,092 

Disposals (1)

(15,796)

15,796 

Depreciation and amortization expense

(93,416)

(93,416)

Transfer to properties held for sale

(3,796)

10,691 

6,895 

Balances at December 31, 2019

813,504 

2,038,471 

(1,035,609)

1,816,366 

Acquisition of real estate facilities

30,261 

27,168 

57,429 

Capital expenditures

36,328 

36,328 

Disposals (1)

(19,399)

19,399 

Depreciation and amortization expense

(90,058)

(90,058)

Transfer to properties held for sale

(1,673)

4,529 

2,856 

Balances at December 31, 2020 (2)

843,765 

2,080,895 

(1,101,739)

1,822,921 

Acquisition of real estate facilities

22,591 

123,711 

146,302 

Capital expenditures

37,976 

37,976 

Disposals (1)

(9,892)

9,892 

Depreciation and amortization expense

(90,175)

(90,175)

Transfer from property held for development

989 

8,063 

9,052 

Transfer to properties held for sale

(1,616)

3,625 

2,009 

Balances at December 31, 2021

$

867,345 

$

2,239,137 

$

(1,178,397)

$

1,928,085 

____________________________

(1)Disposals primarily represent the book value of tenant improvements that have been removed upon the customer vacating their space.

(2)Land, building and improvements, and accumulated depreciation, respectively, totaling $30.9 million, $166.5 million, and $127.4 million were reclassified as of December 31, 2020 to “properties held for sale, net” representing a 772,000 square foot industrial-flex business park located in Irving, Texas, a 371,000 square foot industrial-flex business park located in San Diego, California, a 244,000 square foot office business park located in Herndon, Virginia, a 198,000 square foot office-oriented flex business park located in Chantilly, Virginia, a 53,000 square foot industrial building located in Beltsville, Maryland, and a 22,000 square foot single-tenant industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas.

We have a 95.0% interest in a joint venture that owns Highgate at The Mile, a 395-unit multifamily apartment complex on a 5-acre parcel within The Mile. The remaining 5.0% interest in the joint venture is held by the JV Partner. We consolidate the joint venture that owns Highgate at The Mile and as such, the consolidated real estate assets and activities related to this joint venture are included in the table above.

The unaudited December 31, 2021 net federal tax basis of real estate facilities for federal income tax purposes was approximately $1.8 billion at$1.7 billion.

As of December 31, 2017. 2021, we have commitments, pursuant to executed leases throughout our portfolio, to spend $9.8 million on transaction costs, which include tenant improvements and lease commissions.

Acquisitions

We account for acquisitions as asset acquisitions. The purchase price of acquired properties is allocated to land, buildings, and improvements (including tenant improvements, unamortized lease commissions, acquired in-place lease values and customer relationships, if any), intangible assets and intangible liabilities (see Note 2), based upon the relative fair value of each component, which are evaluated independently.

We

69


The Company must make significant assumptions in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which can affect the recognition and timing of revenue and depreciation and amortization expense. The fair value of land is estimated based upon, among other considerations, comparable sales of land within the same region. The fair value of

57


buildings and improvements is determined using a combination of the income and replacement cost approaches which both utilize available market information relevant to the acquired property. The fair value of other acquired assets including tenant improvements and unamortized lease commissions are based on current marketdetermined using the replacement costs and other market information.cost approach. The amount recorded to acquired in-place leaseslease intangible is also determined utilizing the income approach using market assumptions which are based on management’s assessment of current market conditions and the estimated lease-up periods for the respective spaces. Transaction costs related to asset acquisitions are capitalized.

On September 28, 2016,  weNovember 18, 2021, the Company acquired twoa multi-tenant office buildings aggregating 226,000industrial business park comprising approximately 141,000 rentable square feet in Rockville, Maryland,Plano, Texas, for a total purchase price of $13.3 million. The buildings are located within The Grove 270 (formerly Shady Grove Executive Park)$25.6 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On September 1, 2021, the Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 718,000 rentable square feet in Grapevine, Texas, for a total purchase price of $123.3 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On October 28, 2020, the Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 246,000 rentable square feet in Alexandria, Virginia, for a total purchase price of $46.6 million, where we  own three other buildings aggregating 352,000 square feet. We incurred and expensed acquisitioninclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On January 10, 2020, the Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 73,000 rentable square feet in La Mirada, California, for a total purchase price of $328,000$13.5 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On December 20, 2019, the Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial-flex business park comprising approximately 79,000 rentable square feet in Santa Clara, California, for a total purchase price of $16.8 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

On September 5, 2019, the year ended December 31, 2016.Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 543,000 rentable square feet in Santa Fe Springs, California, for a total purchase price of $104.3 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

We did not acquire any assets or assume any liabilities during On April 18, 2019, the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015.Company acquired a multi-tenant industrial business park comprising approximately 74,000 rentable square feet in Signal Hill, California, for a total purchase price of $13.8 million, inclusive of capitalized transaction costs.

The following table summarizes the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016 2021, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

2021

2020

2019

Land

$

22,591 

$

30,261 

$

88,093 

Buildings and improvements

123,711 

27,168 

44,313 

Other assets (above-market in-place rents)

523 

Accrued and other liabilities (below-market in-place rents)

(1,457)

(557)

(1,241)

Other assets (in-place lease intangible)

4,023 

2,700 

3,777 

Total purchase price

148,868 

60,095 

134,942 

Net operating assets acquired and liabilities assumed

(1,166)

(76)

(664)

Total cash paid

$

147,702 

$

60,019 

$

134,278 

Land

$

5,638 

Buildings and improvements

7,637 

Below-market in-place lease value

(25)

Total purchase price

13,250 

Net operating assets acquired and liabilities assumed

(622)

Total cash paid

$

12,628 

On May 1, 2017,During 2021, we disposedcompleted the development of Empire Commerce, a two-building single-story office park comprising 44,000an 83,000 square feet, located in Dallas,foot shallow-bay industrial building at our Freeport Business Park locatedin Irving, Texas for net proceedstotal development costs of $2.1 million, which resulted in a net gain$8.1 million. The total developed asset value, inclusive of $1.2 million.

On March 31, 2017, we sold development rights to build medical office buildings on land adjacent to our Westech Business Park in Silver Spring, Maryland for $6.5million. We had acquired the development rights as partcosts, of our 2006 acquisition of the park. We received net proceeds of $6.4 million, of which $1.5$9.1 million was received in prior yearsplaced into service on March 1, 2021 and $4.9 millionaccordingly was received in 2017. We recorded a net gain of $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

We classified three office business parks aggregating 705,000 square feet located within Southern California (Irvine, Orange and Santa Ana) as properties held for disposition as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

As of November 1, 2016, we transferred a 123,000 square foot office building located within The Mile that we are seeking to demolish in order to construct another multi-family complex on the parcel. This parcel is reflected under real estate facilities, at cost on our consolidated balance sheets as landat December 31, 2021.

70


As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 83,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our 212 Business Park located in Kent, Washington. As of December 31, 2021, $2.2 million of the estimated $15.4 million total development costs had been incurred and building held for development. The scope and timing of development of this site is subject to a variety of contingencies, including approval of entitlement. Prior to being classified aswas reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $1.2 million that will be paid to various contractors as the project is completed.

As of December 31, 2021, we were in the process of developing an approximately 17,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial building at our Boca Commerce Park, located in Boca Raton, Florida. As of December 31, 2021, $1.1 million of the estimated $4.0 million total development costs had been incurred and was occupied by a single customer.  reflected under land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets. This construction project is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $2.9 million that will be paid to various contractors as the project is completed.

During 2015,Dispositions

On December 30, 2021, the Company sold four business parks, aggregating 492,000a 53,000 square feet,foot industrial building located in non-strategic marketsBeltsville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $41.2$4.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $23.4$3.2 million. Additionally, as part of an eminent domain process,

On December 29, 2021, the Company sold five buildings, aggregating 82,000a 70,000 square feet, at the Company’s Overlake Business Parkfoot industrial-flex building located in Redmond, Washington,Irving, Texas, for $13.9net sale proceeds of $8.8 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $4.8$6.3 million. Including

On October 19, 2021, we sold a 371,000 square foot industrial-flex business park located in San Diego, California, for net sale proceeds of $311.1 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $301.3 million.

On September 17, 2021, the fiveCompany sold a 22,000 square foot industrial-flex building located in Irving, Texas, for net sale proceeds of $3.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $2.9 million.

On July 16, 2021, the Company sold a 244,000 square foot office business parks aggregating 1.9park located in Herndon, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of $40.5 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $27.0 million.

On June 17, 2021, the Company sold a 198,000 square feet and 11.5 acresfoot office-oriented flex business park located in Chantilly, Virginia, for net sale proceeds of land sold$32.6 million, which resulted in 2014, we completed our stated objectivea gain on sale of exiting non-strategic markets$19.2 million. (Collectively the “2021 Assets Sold”).

During 2021, the Company reclassified such assets as properties held for sale, net, in Sacramento, California, Oregon and Arizona.

Asthe consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, we2020.

On September 16, 2020, the Company sold 2 industrial buildings totaling 40,000 square feet located in Redmond, Washington, which were subject to an eminent domain process for net sale proceeds of $11.4 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $7.7 million.

On January 7, 2020, the Company sold an 113,000 square foot office building located at Metro Park North in Rockville, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $29.3 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $19.6 million. (Collectively the “2020 Assets Sold”).

On October 8, 2019, the Company sold 1.3 million rentable square feet of industrial-flex and office business parks located in Rockville and Silver Spring, Maryland, for net sale proceeds of $144.6 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $16.6 million. (Collectively the “2019 Assets Sold”).

The Company determined that the 2021 Assets Sold, 2020 Assets Sold, and the 2019 Assets Sold did not meet the criteria for discontinued operations presentation, as the sale of such assets did not represent a strategic shift that will have commitments, pursuant to executed leases, to spend $12.3 million in transaction costs, which include tenant improvementsa major effect on our operations and lease commissions.financial results.

71


4. Multifamily developmental activity

4.  Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture

In 2013,August 2020, the Company entered into a joint venture known as Amherstthe Brentford Joint Venture with the JV LLC (the “Joint Venture”) with an unrelated real estate development company (the “JV Partner”)Partner for the purpose of developing Brentford at The Mile, a 395-unit multi-family building onplanned 411-unit multifamily apartment complex. Under the Brentford Joint Venture agreement, the Company has a five-acre site (“Highgate”98.2% controlling interest and is the managing member with the JV Partner holding the remaining 1.8% limited partnership interest. We contributed a parcel of land to the Brentford Joint Venture (the “Brentford Parcel”) within The Mile.  We holdat a 95.0% interestvalue of $18.5 million, for which we received equity contribution credit in the Joint Venture with the remaining 5.0% held by the JV Partner. The JV Partner is responsible for the development and construction of Highgate, as well as the leasing and operational management of Highgate. We do not control the Joint Venture, when considering, among other factors, that the consent of our JV Partner is required for all significant decisions. Accordingly, we account for our investment using the

58


equity method. Effective January 1, 2018, the joint venture agreement was amended to provide the Company control of all significant decisions of theBrentford Joint Venture. As such, we commenced consolidating the operating results of Highgate beginning January 1, 2018.

On October 5, 2015 (the “Contribution Date”), we contributed the site and improvements to the Joint Venture. We provide the Joint Venture with a construction loanOur cost basis in the amountBrentford Parcel was $5.1 million as of $75.0 million bearing interestDecember 31, 2021.

Construction of Brentford at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.25%. The loan will mature on April 5, 2019 with two one-year extension options.  

The aggregate amount of development costs are estimatedMile commenced in August 2020 and is anticipated to be $104.0 million (excluding unrealized land appreciation). The Company is committedcompleted over a period of 24 to funding $75.0 million through the construction loan in addition to its equity contribution of $28.5 million, which includes a land basis of $15.3 million.  Highgate delivered its first completed units in May, 2017, and its final completed unit during the fourth quarter of 2017.

We have reflected the aggregate cost of the contributed site and improvements, our equity contributions and loan advances, as well as capitalized third party interest we incurred as investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture. The Company’s investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture was $100.9 million and $67.2 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  For the year ended December 31, 2017,  we made loan advances of $34.1 million and capitalized $506,000 of interest. For the year ended December 31, 2016,  we made loan advances of $33.9 million, capital contributions of $5.7 million and capitalized $885,000 of interest. We expect to invest an additional $3.1 million in the Joint Venture, in order to fund completion of Highgate.

Prior to the Contribution Date, we capitalized $2.8 million to Highgate,  of which $813,000 was related to capitalized interest  from January 1, 2015 through October 5, 2015.  Subsequent to the Contribution Date, we made cash contributions of $5.2 million and capitalized $346,000 of interest on our investment in the Joint Venture from October 6, 2015 through December 31, 2015. The Company made no loan advances to the Joint Venture in 2015.

36 months. As of December 31, 2017, all 395 units have been completed. During2021, the year endeddevelopment cost incurred was $54.8 million, which is reflected in land and building held for development, net on our consolidated balance sheets along with our $5.1 million cost basis in the Brentford Parcel. As of December 31, 2017,2021, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $39.3 million that will be paid to various contractors as the Company recorded an equity loss in the unconsolidated joint venture of $805,000.project is completed.

5. Leasing activity

The Company leases space in its commercial real estate facilities to customers primarily under non-cancelable leases generally ranging from one to 10 years. Future minimum rental revenues,income, excluding recovery of operating expenses that may be collectable under these leases, are as follows as of December 31, 2017 2021 is as follows (in thousands):

2022

$

290,712 

2023

226,498 

2024

160,933 

2025

100,741 

2026

66,388 

Thereafter

107,051 

Total (1)

$

952,323 

____________________________



 

 



 

 

2018

$

287,137 

2019

 

218,321 

2020

 

148,121 

2021

 

102,199 

2022

 

69,049 

Thereafter

 

114,139 

Total

$

938,966 

(1)Excludes future minimum rental income from assets held for sale as of December 31, 2021.

In addition to minimum rental payments, certain customers reimburse the Company for their pro rata share of specified property operating expenses. Such reimbursements amounted to $90.8$104.8 million, $82.6$96.4 million, and $78.9$96.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. These variable lease payment amounts are included as rental income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Leases accounting for 2.9%2.5% of total leased square footage are subject to termination options, of which 1.7% of total leased square footage1.6% have termination options exercisable through December 31, 20182022 (unaudited). In general, these leases provide for termination payments to us should the termination options be exercised. Certain leases also have an option to extend the term of the lease. The future minimum rental revenuesincome in the above table assume suchassumes termination options and lease extension options are not exercised.

59


6. Bank loans

We have aIn August 2021, the Company amended and restated the credit agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) governing its unsecured revolving line of credit (the “Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”). , as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto. The Amended Credit Agreement increased the aggregate principal amount of the Credit Facility has a borrowing limit offrom $250.0million to $400.0 million, and expires January 10, 2022.extended the maturity date to August 24, 2025, with 2 six-month extension options or 1 12-month extension option. The per annum rate of interest charged on borrowings is based on LIBORLondon Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 0.80%0.70% to LIBOR plus 1.55% depending on the Company’s credit ratings.1.35%. Currently, the Company’s rate under the Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 0.825%.0.70% per annum. In addition, the Company is required to pay an annual facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.30%0.25% per annum calculated on the aggregate committed amount of the borrowing limit dependingCredit Facility (currently 0.10% per annum). The interest rate margin and facility fee may increase in the future based on the ratio of the Company’s credit ratings (currently 0.125%). We paid $613,000total consolidated indebtedness to its consolidated gross asset value defined in accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement. The Credit Facility also features a sustainability-linked pricing component whereby the pricing can improve by 0.01%, if the Company meets certain sustainability performance targets, and an

72


accordion feature whereby it has an option to increase commitments under the Credit Facility up to an additional $300.0 million.

The Company had noa $32.0 million balance outstanding, at an interest rate of 0.8%,on ourits Credit Facility at December 31, 20172021 and 2016.a 0 balance outstanding on its Credit Facility at December 31, 2020. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the Company repaid in full the balance outstanding as of December 31, 2021. In connection with the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company paid $2.2 million of loan origination costs. The Company had $921,000$2.1 million and $539,000$0.2 million of total unamortized loan origination costs as of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively, which is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Credit Facility requires usthe Company to meet certain covenants, all of which we wereit was in compliance with at December 31, 2017.2021. Interest on outstanding borrowings is payable monthly.

7. Mortgage note payable

On June 1, 2016, the Company repaid in full the $250.0 million mortgage note which had a fixed interest rate of 5.45%.  

8. Noncontrolling interests

Noncontrolling interests represent (i) PS’s noncontrolling interest in the OP through its ownership of 7,305,355 common partnership units, oftotaling $255.7 million and $215.7 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and (ii) the JV Partner’s interests in our consolidated joint ventures, totaling $3.9 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

PS OP owned by PS. Interests

Each common partnership unit receives a cash distribution equal to the dividend paid on our common sharesstock and is redeemable at PS’s option. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company paid a one-time special cash dividend of $4.60 per share (the “Special Cash Dividend”) along with the fourth quarter regular dividend of $1.05 per share. PS received the same distribution as holders of our common stock.

If PS exercises its right of redemption, at PSB’s option (a) PS will receive one1 share of common sharestock from us for each common partnership unit redeemed, or (b) PS will receive cash from us for each common partnership unit redeemed generally equal to the market value of a share of common sharestock (as defined in the Operating Partnership Agreement). We can prevent redemptions that we believe would violate either our articles of incorporation or securities laws, cause PSB to no longer qualify as a REIT, or could result in the OP no longer being treated as a partnership for U.S. federal tax purposes.

In allocating net income and presenting equity, we treat the common partnership units as if converted to shares of common shares.stock. Accordingly, they receivereceived the same net income allocation per unit as a share of common sharestock totaling $104.3 million, $33.1 million, and are adjusted each period$29.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

JV Partner

During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded capital contributions of $0.7 million, $0.5 million, and $0.0, respectively, from the JV Partner related to haveits noncontrolling interest in the same equity per unit as a common share.Brentford Joint Venture.


9.73


8. Related party transactions

We manage certain industrial, office and retail facilities in the United States for PS under either the “Public Storage” or “PS Business Parks” names (the “PS Management Agreement”). Under PS’s supervision, we coordinate and assist in rental and marketing activities, property maintenance and other operational activities, including the selection of vendors, suppliers, employees, and independent contractors. We receive a management fee based upon a percentage of revenues.revenues, which is included in interest and other income on our consolidated statements of income. Management fee revenues were $506,000,  $518,000 and $540,000$0.3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015, respectively.2019. We allocate certain operating expenses to PS related to the management of these properties, including payroll and other business expenses, totaling $537,000,  $554,000$0.3 million, $0.4 million, and $613,000$0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. These amounts are included in “interest and other income” on our consolidated statements of income.

The PS Business Parks name and logo are owned by PS and licensed to us under a non-exclusive, royalty-free license agreement. The license can be terminated by either party for any reason with six months written notice.

PS provides us property management services for the self-storage component of two2 assets we own and operates them under the “Public Storage” name. Either the Company or PS can cancel the property management contract upon 60 days’ notice. Under our supervision, PS coordinates and assists in rental and marketing activities, and property maintenance and other operational activities, including the selection of vendors, suppliers, employees, and independent contractors. Management fee expenses were $92,000, $86,000 and $79,000$0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015, respectively.2019. Additionally, PS allocated certain operating expenses to us related to the management of these properties totaling $61,000$0.1 million for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 2015.2019. These amounts are included under “costcost of operations”operations on our consolidated statements of income.

60


Pursuant to a cost sharing and administrative services agreement, we share certain administrative services, corporate office space, and certain other third party costs with PS which are allocated based upon time, effortfair and other methodologies.reasonable estimates of the cost of the services expected to be provided. We reimbursed PS $1.3$1.4 million $1.1 millionfor costs PS incurred on our behalf for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $1.2 million respectively, infor each of the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162020, and 2015 for costs paid on our behalf, and2019. PS reimbursed us $31,000 and $38,000less than $0.1 million for costs we incurred on their behalf for each of the years ended December 31, 20172021, 2020, and 2016, respectively.2019.

The Company had net amounts due from PS of $0.2 million and due to PS of $245,000less than $0.1 million at December 31, 20172021 and due from PS of $295,000 at December 31, 20162020, respectively, for these contracts, as well as for certain operating expenses paid by the Company on behalf of PS.contracts.

10. Shareholders’9. Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock

As of December 31, 20172021 and 2016,2020, the Company had the following series of preferred stock outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2021

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Earliest Potential

 

Dividend

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

Earliest Potential

Dividend

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Series

 

Issuance Date

 

Redemption Date

 

Rate

 

Outstanding

 

(in thousands)

 

Outstanding

 

(in thousands)

Issuance Date

Redemption Date

Rate

Outstanding

(in thousands)

Outstanding

(in thousands)

Series U

 

September, 2012

 

September, 2017

 

5.750% 

 

9,200 

 

$

230,000 

 

9,200 

 

$

230,000 

Series V

 

March, 2013

 

March, 2018

 

5.700% 

 

4,400 

 

 

110,000 

 

4,400 

 

 

110,000 

Series W

 

October, 2016

 

October, 2021

 

5.200% 

 

7,590 

 

 

189,750 

 

7,590 

 

 

189,750 

Series X

 

September, 2017

 

September, 2022

 

5.250% 

 

9,200 

 

 

230,000 

 

 

 

September 2017

September 2022

5.250%

9,200 

230,000 

9,200 

230,000 

Series Y

 

December, 2017

 

December, 2022

 

5.200% 

 

8,000 

 

 

200,000 

 

 

 

December 2017

December 2022

5.200%

8,000 

200,000 

8,000 

200,000 

Series T

 

May, 2012

 

May, 2017

 

6.000% 

 

 

 

 

14,000 

 

 

350,000 

Series Z

November 2019

November 2024

4.875%

13,000 

325,000 

13,000 

325,000 

Series W

October 2016

November 2021 (Redeemed)

5.200%

7,590 

189,750 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,390 

 

$

959,750 

 

35,190 

 

$

879,750 

30,200 

$

755,000 

37,790 

$

944,750 

On December 4, 2017, we called our remaining 6.00%November 3, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of its 5.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series T, for redemptionW, at par and completed the redemption on January 3, 2018.  Weof $189.8 million. The Company recorded a Preferred Redemption Allocation of $4.1$6.4 million infor the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2017 and reclassified2021.

On December 30, 2019, the shares from equity to “preferred stock calledCompany completed the redemption of its 5.75% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series U, at par of $230.0 million as well as its 5.70% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series V, at par of $110.0 million. The Company recorded a Preferred Redemption Allocation of $11.0 million for redemption” on our consolidated balance sheets atthe year ended December 31, 2017.2019.

74


Table of Contents

On December 7, 2017,November 4, 2019, we issued $200.0$325.0 million or 8,000,00013,000,000 depositary sharesstock representing interests in our 5.20%4.875% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Y,Z, at $25.00 per depositary share. The 5.20%4.875% Series YZ Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units are non-callable for five years and have no0 mandatory redemption. We received $193.6$316.0 million in net issuance proceeds.

On October 30, 2017, we completed a partial redemption of 8,800,000 of our outstanding 14,000,000 depositary shares representing interests in our 6.0% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series T, at par of $220.0 million. We recorded a Preferred Redemption Allocation of $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On September 21, 2017, we issued $230.0 million or 9,200,000 depositary shares representing interests in our 5.25% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series X, at $25.00 per depositary share. The 5.25% Series X Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units are non-callable for five years and have no mandatory redemption. We received $222.2 million in net proceeds.

On December 7, 2016,  we called our 6.45% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series S, for redemption at par and completed the redemption on January 18, 2017. We recorded a Preferred Redemption Allocation of $7.3 million in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and reclassified the shares from equity to “preferred stock called for redemption” on our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2016.

On October 20, 2016, we issued $189.8 million or 7,590,000 depositary shares representing interests in our 5.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series W, at $25.00 per depositary share. The 5.20% Series W Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units are non-callable for five years and have no mandatory redemption. We received $183.3 million in net proceeds.

61


Table of Contents

On October 15, 2015, we completed the redemption of our 6.875% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series R, at par.  We recorded a Preferred Redemption Allocation of $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

We paid $52.2$46.6 million, $57.3$48.2 million, and $59.4$54.3 million in distributions to our preferred shareholdersstockholders for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively.

The holders of our preferred stock have general preference rights with respect to liquidation, quarterly distributions, and any accumulated unpaid distributions. Holders of our preferred stock will not be entitled to vote on most matters, except under certain conditions. In the event of a cumulative arrearage equal to six6 quarterly dividends, the holders of theour preferred stock will have the right to elect two2 additional members to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) until all events of default have been cured. At December 31, 2017,2021, there were no0 dividends in arrears.

Except under certain conditions relating to the Company’s qualification as a REIT, theour preferred stock is not redeemable prior to the previouslyredemption dates noted redemption dates.above. On or after the respective redemption dates, the respective series of preferred stock will be redeemable, at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at $25.00 per depositary share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.

Common stock and units

DuringDividends declared for the three months ended MarchDecember 31, 2017,2021 included a one-time Special Cash Dividend along with the Board increased our quarterlyfourth quarter regular dividend of $1.05 per share. The Special Cash Dividend was declared to distribute a portion of the excess income attributable to gains on sales from $0.75 per common share to $0.85 per common share.asset dispositions during 2021, as discussed in Note 3.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Board increased our quarterly dividend from $0.60 per common share to $0.75 per common share. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Board increased our quarterly dividend from $0.50 per common share to $0.60 per common share.

We paid $92.5$242.6 million ($3.408.80 per share of common share)stock), $81.3$115.4 million ($3.004.20 per share of common share)stock), and $59.4$115.2 million ($2.204.20 per share of common share)stock) in distributions to our common shareholdersstockholders for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. We paid $64.3 million ($8.80 per common unit), $30.7 million ($4.20 per common unit), and $30.7 million ($4.20 per common unit) in distributions to our common unit holders for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The portion of the distributions classified as ordinary income was 95.9%35.0%, 100.0% and 89.4%100.0% for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. The portion of the distributions classified as long-term capital gain income was 4.1%65.0%, 0.0% and 10.6%0.0% for the years ended December 31, 2017,  20162021, 2020, and 2015,2019, respectively. The percentages in the two preceding sentences are unaudited.

Equity stock

In addition to common and preferred stock, theThe Company is authorized to issue 100.0 million shares of Equity Stock. The Articlesequity stock. Our articles of Incorporationincorporation provide that Equity Stockequity stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series and give the Board broad authority to fix the dividend and distribution rights, conversion and voting rights, redemption provisions and liquidation rights of each series of Equity Stock.equity stock. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, 0 equity stock had been issued.

11.10. Stock compensation

Under various share-based compensation plans, PSB grants non-qualified options to purchase the Company’s common sharesstock at a price not less than fair value on the date of grant, as well as restricted stock units (“RSUs”),RSUs, to certain directors, officers, and key employees.

The service period for stock options and RSUs begins when (i) the Company and the recipient reach a mutual understanding of the key terms of the award, (ii) the award has been authorized, (iii) the recipient is affected by changes in the market price of our stock and (iv) it is probable that any performance conditions will be met, and ends when the stock optionoptions or RSU vests.RSUs vest.


We account for forfeitures of share-based payments as they occur by reversing previously amortized share-based compensation expense with respect to grants that are forfeited in the period the employee terminates employment. We recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $807,000 to decrease accumulated earnings (deficit) and increase paid-in capital representing the impact of estimated forfeitures on our cumulative share-based compensation expense recorded through September 30, 2016.

62

75


Table of Contents

We amortize the fair value of awards starting at the beginning of the service period as compensation expense. For awards that are earned solely upon the passage of time and continued service, the entire cost of the award is amortized on a straight-line basis over the service period. For awards with performance conditions, the individual cost of each vesting is amortized separately over each individual service period (the “accelerated attribution” method).

In connection with the appointment of our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) effective April 5, 2021, the Company granted a one-time RSU sign-on award with a grant date fair value of $3.7 million and a retention RSU award with a grant date fair value of $2.9 million. These RSUs will vest ratably over five years.

Effective September 1, 2020, Maria Hawthorne retired from her role as President and CEO and continues to serve as a director of the Company. Due to Ms. Hawthorne’s continued service as a director of the Company, her unvested stock options and restricted stock units will continue to vest on their original vesting schedule in accordance with the Company’s 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and related award agreements. For financial reporting purposes, the end of the service periods for these stock option and restricted stock unit grants have changed from the various respective vesting dates to September 1, 2020, the date of her retirement as President and CEO. Accordingly, all remaining stock compensation expense for Ms. Hawthorne, which totaled $1.7 million, was amortized, and included in general and administrative expense during the year ended December 31, 2020.

We account for forfeitures of share-based payments as they occur by reversing previously amortized share-based compensation expense with respect to unvested grants that are forfeited in the period the employee terminates employment.

Stock Options

Stock options expire 10 years after the grant date and the exercise price is equal to the closing trading price of our common sharesstock on the grant date. EmployeesStock option holders cannot require the Company to settle their award in cash. We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of our stock options on the date of grant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

2021

2020

2019

Stock option expense for the year ( in 000's)

 

$

209 

 

$

282 

 

$

261 

$

712 

$

412 

$

299 

Aggregate exercise date intrinsic value of options exercised during the year (in 000's)

 

$

5,177 

 

$

3,416 

 

$

2,633 

$

4,559 

$

305 

$

1,567 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average assumptions used in valuing options with the Black-Scholes method:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected life of options in years, based upon historical experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.9% 

 

1.1% 

 

1.4% 

0.8%

0.4%

2.0%

Expected volatility, based upon historical volatility

 

 

17.5% 

 

15.5% 

 

16.1% 

15.4%

22.3%

22.2%

Expected dividend yield

 

 

2.8% 

 

2.9% 

 

2.5% 

2.6%

3.3%

2.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average estimated value of options granted during the year

 

$

14.42 

 

$

9.05 

 

$

8.49 

$

14.40 

$

15.27 

$

26.85 

Included in 2021 compensation expense related to stock options was $0.1 million of expense resulting from modifications made to outstanding stock options because of the Special Cash Dividend paid in December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2017,2021, there was $551,000$0.9 million of unamortized compensation expense related to stock options expected to be recognizedrecognize over a weighted average period of 3.43.0 years.

Cash received from 73,24655,546 stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20172021 was $4.2$5.0 million. Cash received from 68,0194,136 stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20162020 was $3.9$0.3 million. Cash received from 99,17815,585 stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20152019 was $5.1$1.0 million.

In connection with the Special Cash Dividend discussed in Note 9, the number of options and exercise prices of all outstanding options were adjusted pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the applicable plans so that the option holders would be neither advantaged nor disadvantaged because of the Special Cash Dividend.

76


Table of Contents

Information with respect to stock options during 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 20152019 is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Aggregate

Weighted

Aggregate

 

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

 

Intrinsic

Weighted

Average

Intrinsic

Number of

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Value

Number of

Average

Remaining

Value

Options:

Options

 

Exercise Price

 

Contract Life

 

 

(in thousands)

Options

Exercise Price

Contract Life

(in thousands)

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

341,852 

 

$

57.11 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

143,415 

$

86.42 

Granted

16,000 

 

$

80.13 

 

 

 

 

 

34,000 

$

163.95 

Exercised

(99,178)

 

$

51.31 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,585)

$

62.15 

Forfeited

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

(4,000)

$

110.04 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

258,674 

 

$

60.76 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

157,830 

$

104.92 

Granted

39,000 

 

$

102.58 

 

 

 

 

 

18,000 

$

127.22 

Exercised

(68,019)

 

$

57.17 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,136)

$

62.69 

Forfeited

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

229,655 

 

$

68.93 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

171,694 

$

108.29 

Granted

16,000 

 

$

121.57 

 

 

 

 

 

38,000 

$

162.63 

Exercised

(73,246)

 

$

57.59 

 

 

 

 

 

(55,546)

$

90.24 

Forfeited

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

172,409 

 

$

78.63 

 

5.63 Years

 

$

8,010 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

106,739 

 

$

64.96 

 

4.10 Years

 

$

6,418 

Special cash dividend adjustment (1)

5,422 

$

124.13 

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

159,570 

$

123.87 

6.21 Years

$

9,622 

Exercisable at December 31, 2021 (1)

79,651 

$

99.71 

3.98 Years

$

6,727 

____________________________

63(1)In accordance with the applicable equity award plan documents, the number and exercise price of outstanding options have been adjusted because of the Special Cash Dividend so that the option holder maintains their economic position with respect to the stockholders.


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs granted prior to 2016 are subject to a six-year vesting, with 20% vesting after year two, and 20% vesting after each of the next four years. RSUs granted during and subsequent to 2016 are subject to a five-year vesting at the rate of 20% per year or a three-year vesting at the rate of one-third per year. The grantee receivesGrantees receive dividends for each outstanding RSU equal to the per-share dividendsper share dividend received by common shareholders.stockholders, which are recorded in paid-in capital. We expense any dividends previously paid upon forfeiture of the related RSU. Upon vesting, the grantee receives shares of common sharesstock equal to the number of vested RSUs, less shares of common sharesstock withheld in exchange for tax depositswithholdings made by the Company to satisfy the grantee’s statutory tax liabilities arising from the vesting. The fair value of our RSUs is determined based upon the applicable closing trading price of our common sharesstock on the date of grant.

In March 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved an annual performance-based equity incentive program (“Annual Equity Incentive Program”) under the Company’s 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan. Under the program, certain employees will be eligible on an annual basis to receive RSUs based on the Company’s achievement of pre-established targets for (i) growth in net asset value per share, and (ii) stockholder value creation, each as computed pursuant to the terms of the Annual Equity Incentive Program. In the event the pre-established targets are achieved, eligible employees will receive the target award, except that the Compensation Committee of the Board may adjust the actual award to 75%-125% of the target award based on the its assessment of whether certain strategic and operational goals were accomplished in the performance period. RSUs awarded under the Annual Equity Incentive Program for the 2021 performance year will be awarded on or around March 1, 2022 and will vest in 5 equal installments, with the first installment vesting on the award date. RSU holders will earn dividend equivalent rights during the vesting period.

In connection with the Annual Equity Incentive Program for the 2021 performance year, targets for 2021 were achieved at the threshold total return level. As such, subsequent to December 31, 2021, 25,140 restricted stock units were awarded with a March 1, 2021 grant date fair value of $3.6 million.

77


Table of Contents

Information with respect to RSUs during 2017, 20162021, 2020, and 20152019 is as follows:follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

Weighted

Number of

 

Average Grant

Number of

Average Grant

Restricted Stock Units:

Units

 

Date Fair Value

RSUs

Date Fair Value

Nonvested at December 31, 2014

35,170 

 

$

65.62 

Nonvested at December 31, 2018

243,290 

$

23,386 

Granted

75,606 

 

$

82.78 

6,400 

1,137 

Vested

(25,384)

 

$

74.19 

(95,500)

(8,753)

Forfeited

(6,740)

 

$

76.22 

(3,342)

(345)

Nonvested at December 31, 2015

78,652 

 

$

78.44 

Nonvested at December 31, 2019

150,848 

15,425 

Granted

119,950 

 

$

87.45 

46,036 

5,562 

Vested

(47,779)

 

$

80.45 

(73,256)

(6,991)

Forfeited

(6,130)

 

$

76.51 

(2,120)

(290)

Nonvested at December 31, 2016

144,693 

 

$

58.56 

Nonvested at December 31, 2020

121,508 

$

13,706 

Granted

113,750 

 

$

94.49 

76,266 

11,948 

Vested

(76,994)

 

$

84.05 

(61,243)

(6,255)

Forfeited

(16,366)

 

$

84.36 

(17,940)

(2,107)

Nonvested at December 31, 2017

165,083 

 

$

83.20 

Nonvested at December 31, 2021

118,591 

$

17,292 

Of the 76,266 RSUs the Company granted during the year ended December 31, 2021, 41,186 RSUs were granted to our President and CEO in April 2021 (discussed above), 10,955 were granted to our former Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), 3,053 were granted to our Chief Accounting Officer and 16,970 RSUs in aggregate to our Divisional Vice Presidents. Subsequent to December 31, 2021,14,070 RSUs previously awarded to our former CFO were forfeited.

As of December 31, 2017,2021, there was $8.2$12.6 million of unamortized compensation expense related to RSUs expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands, except number of shares)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

Restricted share unit expense

 

$

4,279 

 

$

10,290 

 

$

8,668 

Common shares issued upon vesting

 

 

43,223 

 

 

28,046 

 

 

15,734 

Fair value of vested shares on vesting date

 

$

8,816 

 

$

4,699 

 

$

2,018 

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of shares upon vesting of RSUs

 

$

3,865 

 

$

1,940 

 

$

767 

(In thousands, except number of shares)

2021

2020

2019

Restricted stock unit expense

$

6,685 

$

4,475 

$

3,196 

Shares of common stock issued upon vesting

35,714 

43,458 

55,267 

Fair value of vested common stock on vesting date

$

9,474 

$

10,350 

$

15,078 

Cash paid for taxes in lieu of shares of common stock withheld upon vesting of RSUs

$

3,940 

$

4,216 

$

6,350 

Effective March, 2014,Under the Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Director Retirement Plan”), the Company entered intogrants 1,000 shares of common stock for each year served as a performance-based restricted stock unit program, the Senior Management Long-Term Equity Incentive Program for 2014-2017 (“LTEIP”),director up to a maximum of 10,000 shares issued upon retirement. The Company recognizes compensation expense with certain employees of the Company. Under the LTEIP, the Company established three levels of targeted restricted stock unit awards for certain employees, which wouldregard to grants to be earned only if the Company achieved one of three defined targets during 2014 to 2017. Under the LTEIP there is an annual award following the end of each of the four yearsissued in the program, with the award subject to and based on the achievement of total return targets during the previous year, as well as an award based on achieving total return targets during the cumulative four-year period 2014-2017. In the event the minimum defined target is not achieved for an annual award, the restricted stock units allocated to be awarded for such year are added to the restricted stock units that may be received if the four-year target is achieved. All restricted stock unit awardsfuture under the LTEIP vest in four equal annual installments beginning fromDirector Retirement Plan over the daterequisite service period. The Company recorded compensation expense related to these shares of award. Up to 94,150 restricted stock units would be awarded for each of the four years assuming achievement was met$1.1 million, $0.8 million, and up to 81,800 restricted stock units would be awarded$1.5 million for the cumulative four-year period assuming achievement was met. Compensation expense is recognized based on the restricted stock units expected to be awarded based on the target level that is expected to be achieved. The compensation expenseyears ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and RSU counts with respect to the LTEIP are included in the aggregate RSU amounts disclosed above. Senior management earned 145,3502019, respectively.

In April 2021, we issued 10,000 shares of restrictedcommon stock units to be granted in 2018 as the maximum targetsa director upon retirement with an aggregate fair value of $1.6 million. No director retirement shares were achieved forissued during the year ended December 31, 20172020. In April 2019, we issued 8,000 shares of common stock to a director upon retirement with an aggregate fair value of $1.2 million. Compensation expense for such shares issued in 2021 and for the cumulative four-year period.2019 was previously recognized.

64


Table of Contents

12. Supplementary quarterly financial data (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended



 

March 31, 2017

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2017

Rental income

$

100,061 

 

$

99,800 

 

$

100,481 

 

$

101,837 

Cost of operations

$

31,033 

 

$

30,250 

 

$

31,679 

 

$

32,378 

Net income allocable to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

common shareholders

$

26,392 

 

$

24,742 

 

$

18,138 

 

$

21,150 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.97 

 

$

0.91 

 

$

0.67 

 

$

0.78 

Diluted

$

0.97 

 

$

0.90 

 

$

0.66 

 

$

0.77 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended



 

March 31, 2016

 

 

June 30, 2016

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2016

Rental income

$

95,845 

 

$

96,087 

 

$

97,340 

 

$

97,599 

Cost of operations

$

31,894 

 

$

29,750 

 

$

30,796 

 

$

30,668 

Net income allocable to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

common shareholders

$

14,569 

 

$

15,731 

 

$

19,718 

 

$

12,854 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.54 

 

$

0.58 

 

$

0.73 

 

$

0.47 

Diluted

$

0.54 

 

$

0.58 

 

$

0.72 

 

$

0.47 

13.11. Commitments and contingencies

The Company currently is neither subject to any material litigation nor, to management’s knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against the Company other than routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.

65

78


Table of Contents

PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 20172021

(IN THOUSANDS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

Gross Carrying Amount at

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Acquisition

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

Acquisition

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciable

Buildings

Buildings

Buildings

Depreciable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

and

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Lives

and

and

and

Accumulated

Lives

Description

 

Location

 

Square Feet

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Improvements

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Total

 

Depreciation

 

Year(s) Acquired

 

(Years)

Location

Square Feet

Land

Improvements

Improvements

Land

Improvements

Total

Depreciation

Year(s) Acquired

(Years)

Buena Park Industrial Center

 

Buena Park, CA

 

317 

 

$

3,245 

 

$

7,703 

 

$

2,743 

 

$

3,245 

 

$

10,446 

 

$

13,691 

 

$

7,474 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Buena Park, CA

317

$

3,245

$

7,703

$

3,663

$

3,245

$

11,366

$

14,611

$

8,982

1997

5

-

30

Carson

 

Carson, CA

 

77 

 

 

990 

 

 

2,496 

 

 

1,573 

 

 

990 

 

 

4,069 

 

 

5,059 

 

 

2,989 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Carson, CA

77

990

2,496

1,805

990

4,301

5,291

3,591

1997

5

-

30

Cerritos Business Center

 

Cerritos, CA

 

395 

 

 

4,218 

 

 

10,273 

 

 

4,230 

 

 

4,218 

 

 

14,503 

 

 

18,721 

 

 

10,436 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Cerritos, CA

395

4,218

10,273

4,952

4,218

15,225

19,443

12,417

1997

5

-

30

Cerritos/Edwards

 

Cerritos, CA

 

31 

 

 

450 

 

 

1,217 

 

 

1,460 

 

 

450 

 

 

2,677 

 

 

3,127 

 

 

2,064 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Cerritos, CA

31

450

1,217

1,728

450

2,945

3,395

2,443

1997

5

-

30

Concord Business Park

 

Concord, CA

 

246 

 

 

12,454 

 

 

20,491 

 

 

1,144 

 

 

12,454 

 

 

21,635 

 

 

34,089 

 

 

5,844 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Concord, CA

246

12,454

20,491

1,282

12,454

21,773

34,227

8,788

2011

5

-

30

Culver City

 

Culver City, CA

 

147 

 

 

3,252 

 

 

8,157 

 

 

6,020 

 

 

3,252 

 

 

14,177 

 

 

17,429 

 

 

10,598 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Culver City, CA

147

3,252

8,157

6,608

3,252

14,765

18,017

12,572

1997

5

-

30

Bayview Business Park

 

Fremont, CA

 

104 

 

 

4,990 

 

 

4,831 

 

 

354 

 

 

4,990 

 

 

5,185 

 

 

10,175 

 

 

1,719 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Fremont, CA

104

4,990

4,831

412

4,990

5,243

10,233

2,379

2011

5

-

30

Christy Business Park

 

Fremont, CA

 

334 

 

 

11,451 

 

 

16,254 

 

 

1,737 

 

 

11,451 

 

 

17,991 

 

 

29,442 

 

 

5,786 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Fremont, CA

334

11,451

16,254

1,714

11,451

17,968

29,419

7,927

2011

5

-

30

Industrial Drive Distribution Center

 

Fremont, CA

 

199 

 

 

7,482 

 

 

6,812 

 

 

798 

 

 

7,482 

 

 

7,610 

 

 

15,092 

 

 

2,187 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Fremont, CA

199

7,482

6,812

1,257

7,482

8,069

15,551

3,477

2011

5

-

30

Bay Center Business Park

 

Hayward, CA

 

463 

 

 

19,052 

 

 

50,501 

 

 

3,862 

 

 

19,052 

 

 

54,363 

 

 

73,415 

 

 

14,858 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

463

19,052

50,501

3,631

19,052

54,132

73,184

21,477

2011

5

-

30

Cabot Distribution Center

 

Hayward, CA

 

249 

 

 

5,859 

 

 

10,811 

 

 

374 

 

 

5,859 

 

 

11,185 

 

 

17,044 

 

 

2,897 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

249

5,859

10,811

532

5,859

11,343

17,202

4,144

2011

5

-

30

Diablo Business Park

 

Hayward, CA

 

271 

 

 

9,102 

 

 

15,721 

 

 

969 

 

 

9,102 

 

 

16,690 

 

 

25,792 

 

 

4,592 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

271

9,102

15,721

1,189

9,102

16,910

26,012

6,778

2011

5

-

30

Eden Landing

 

Hayward, CA

 

83 

 

 

3,275 

 

 

6,174 

 

 

148 

 

 

3,275 

 

 

6,322 

 

 

9,597 

 

 

1,784 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

83

3,275

6,174

212

3,275

6,386

9,661

2,558

2011

5

-

30

Hayward Business Park

 

Hayward, CA

 

1,091 

 

 

28,256 

 

 

54,418 

 

 

2,867 

 

 

28,256 

 

 

57,285 

 

 

85,541 

 

 

15,275 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

1,091

28,256

54,418

8,582

28,256

63,000

91,256

23,024

2011

5

-

30

Huntwood Business Park

 

Hayward, CA

 

176 

 

 

7,391 

 

 

11,819 

 

 

943 

 

 

7,391 

 

 

12,762 

 

 

20,153 

 

 

3,789 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

176

7,391

11,819

1,383

7,391

13,202

20,593

5,213

2011

5

-

30

Parkway Commerce

 

Hayward, CA

 

407 

 

 

4,398 

 

 

10,433 

 

 

4,313 

 

 

4,398 

 

 

14,746 

 

 

19,144 

 

 

10,412 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Hayward, CA

407

4,398

10,433

4,724

4,398

15,157

19,555

12,384

1997

5

-

30

La Mirada Commerce Center

La Mirada, CA

73

11,122

2,153

513

11,122

2,666

13,788

364

2020

5

-

30

Laguna Hills Commerce Center

 

Laguna Hills, CA

 

513 

 

 

16,261 

 

 

39,559 

 

 

7,570 

 

 

16,261 

 

 

47,129 

 

 

63,390 

 

 

32,382 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Laguna Hills, CA

513

16,262

39,559

9,422

16,262

48,981

65,243

39,294

1997

5

-

30

Plaza Del Lago

 

Laguna Hills, CA

 

101 

 

 

2,037 

 

 

5,051 

 

 

4,051 

 

 

2,037 

 

 

9,102 

 

 

11,139 

 

 

6,743 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Laguna Hills, CA

101

2,037

5,051

4,232

2,037

9,283

11,320

7,755

1997

5

-

30

Caada Business Center

 

Lake Forest, CA

 

297 

 

 

5,508 

 

 

13,785 

 

 

6,158 

 

 

5,508 

 

 

19,943 

 

 

25,451 

 

 

14,095 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Canada Business Center

Lake Forest, CA

297

5,508

13,785

6,961

5,508

20,746

26,254

16,826

1997

5

-

30

Dixon Landing Business Park

 

Milpitas, CA

 

505 

 

 

26,301 

 

 

21,121 

 

 

3,911 

 

 

26,301 

 

 

25,032 

 

 

51,333 

 

 

8,061 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Milpitas, CA

505

26,301

21,121

4,438

26,301

25,559

51,860

11,490

2011

5

-

30

Monterey/Calle

 

Monterey, CA

 

12 

 

 

288 

 

 

706 

 

 

348 

 

 

288 

 

 

1,054 

 

 

1,342 

 

 

761 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Monterey, CA

12

288

706

382

288

1,088

1,376

927

1997

5

-

30

Monterey Park

 

Monterey Park, CA

 

199 

 

 

3,078 

 

 

7,862 

 

 

1,631 

 

 

3,078 

 

 

9,493 

 

 

12,571 

 

 

6,895 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Monterey Park, CA

199

3,078

7,862

1,878

3,078

9,740

12,818

8,158

1997

5

-

30

Port of Oakland

 

Oakland, CA

 

200 

 

 

5,638 

 

 

11,066 

 

 

775 

 

 

5,638 

 

 

11,841 

 

 

17,479 

 

 

3,256 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Oakland, CA

200

5,638

11,066

914

5,638

11,980

17,618

4,901

2011

5

-

30

Kearney Mesa

 

San Diego, CA

 

164 

 

 

2,894 

 

 

7,089 

 

 

2,940 

 

 

2,894 

 

 

10,029 

 

 

12,923 

 

 

7,276 

 

1997

 

5- 30

San Diego, CA

164

2,894

7,089

3,983

2,894

11,072

13,966

8,642

1997

5

-

30

Lusk

 

San Diego, CA

 

371 

 

 

5,711 

 

 

14,049 

 

 

5,840 

 

 

5,711 

 

 

19,889 

 

 

25,600 

 

 

14,268 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Rose Canyon Business Park

 

San Diego, CA

 

233 

 

 

15,129 

 

 

20,054 

 

 

2,471 

 

 

15,129 

 

 

22,525 

 

 

37,654 

 

 

12,753 

 

2005

 

5- 30

San Diego, CA

233

15,129

20,054

3,058

15,129

23,112

38,241

15,452

2005

5

-

30

Charcot Business Park

 

San Jose, CA

 

283 

 

 

18,654 

 

 

17,580 

 

 

1,794 

 

 

18,654 

 

 

19,374 

 

 

38,028 

 

 

6,149 

 

2011/2014

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

283

18,654

17,580

2,113

18,654

19,693

38,347

8,692

2011/2014

5

-

30

Las Plumas

 

San Jose, CA

 

214 

 

 

4,379 

 

 

12,889 

 

 

6,709 

 

 

4,379 

 

 

19,598 

 

 

23,977 

 

 

15,144 

 

1998

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

214

4,379

12,889

6,900

4,379

19,789

24,168

17,082

1998

5

-

30

Little Orchard Distribution Center

 

San Jose, CA

 

213 

 

 

7,725 

 

 

3,846 

 

 

624 

 

 

7,725 

 

 

4,470 

 

 

12,195 

 

 

1,433 

 

2011

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

213

7,725

3,846

1,851

7,725

5,697

13,422

2,135

2011

5

-

30

Montague Industrial Park

 

San Jose, CA

 

316 

 

 

14,476 

 

 

12,807 

 

 

484 

 

 

14,476 

 

 

13,291 

 

 

27,767 

 

 

4,762 

 

2011

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

316

14,476

12,807

782

14,476

13,589

28,065

6,345

2011

5

-

30

Oakland Road

 

San Jose, CA

 

177 

 

 

3,458 

 

 

8,765 

 

 

3,218 

 

 

3,458 

 

 

11,983 

 

 

15,441 

 

 

8,647 

 

1997

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

177

3,458

8,765

3,415

3,458

12,180

15,638

10,210

1997

5

-

30

Rogers Ave

 

San Jose, CA

 

67 

 

 

3,540 

 

 

4,896 

 

 

612 

 

 

3,540 

 

 

5,508 

 

 

9,048 

 

 

2,853 

 

2006

 

5- 30

San Jose, CA

67

3,540

4,896

564

3,540

5,460

9,000

3,379

2006

5

-

30

Doolittle Business Park

 

San Leandro, CA

 

113 

 

 

3,929 

 

 

6,231 

 

 

448 

 

 

3,929 

 

 

6,679 

 

 

10,608 

 

 

1,970 

 

2011

 

5- 30

San Leandro, CA

113

3,929

6,231

355

3,929

6,586

10,515

2,677

2011

5

-

30

Bayshore Corporate Center

 

San Mateo, CA

 

340 

 

 

25,108 

 

 

36,891 

 

 

6,424 

 

 

25,108 

 

 

43,315 

 

 

68,423 

 

 

12,152 

 

2013

 

5- 30

San Mateo, CA

340

25,109

36,891

7,647

25,109

44,538

69,647

18,644

2013

5

-

30

San Ramon/Norris Canyon

 

San Ramon, CA

 

52 

 

 

1,486 

 

 

3,642 

 

 

1,368 

 

 

1,486 

 

 

5,010 

 

 

6,496 

 

 

3,563 

 

1997

 

5- 30

San Ramon, CA

52

1,486

3,642

1,385

1,486

5,027

6,513

4,154

1997

5

-

30

Commerce Park

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

251 

 

 

17,218 

 

 

21,914 

 

 

3,721 

 

 

17,218 

 

 

25,635 

 

 

42,853 

 

 

16,548 

 

2007

 

5- 30

Santa Clara, CA

251

17,218

21,914

4,012

17,218

25,926

43,144

18,298

2007

5

-

30

66

79


Table of Contents





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Acquisition

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciable



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

and

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Lives

Description

 

Location

 

Square Feet

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Improvements

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Total

 

Depreciation

 

Year(s) Acquired

 

(Years)

Santa Clara Tech Park

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

178 

 

 

7,673 

 

 

15,645 

 

 

4,533 

 

 

7,673 

 

 

20,178 

 

 

27,851 

 

 

14,168 

 

2000

 

5- 30

Walsh at Lafayette

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

321 

 

 

13,439 

 

 

17,890 

 

 

281 

 

 

13,439 

 

 

18,171 

 

 

31,610 

 

 

5,865 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Signal Hill

 

Signal Hill, CA

 

269 

 

 

6,693 

 

 

12,699 

 

 

2,805 

 

 

6,693 

 

 

15,504 

 

 

22,197 

 

 

9,633 

 

1997/2006

 

5- 30

Airport Boulevard

 

So San Francisco, CA

 

52 

 

 

899 

 

 

2,387 

 

 

808 

 

 

899 

 

 

3,195 

 

 

4,094 

 

 

2,260 

 

1997

 

5- 30

South San Francisco/Produce

 

So San Francisco, CA

 

41 

 

 

776 

 

 

1,886 

 

 

552 

 

 

776 

 

 

2,438 

 

 

3,214 

 

 

1,714 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Studio City/Ventura

 

Studio City, CA

 

22 

 

 

621 

 

 

1,530 

 

 

589 

 

 

621 

 

 

2,119 

 

 

2,740 

 

 

1,519 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Kifer Industrial Park

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

287 

 

 

13,227 

 

 

37,874 

 

 

1,407 

 

 

13,227 

 

 

39,281 

 

 

52,508 

 

 

10,347 

 

2011

 

5- 30

Torrance

 

Torrance, CA

 

147 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

6,069 

 

 

3,466 

 

 

2,318 

 

 

9,535 

 

 

11,853 

 

 

6,992 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Boca Commerce

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

135 

 

 

7,795 

 

 

9,258 

 

 

3,207 

 

 

7,795 

 

 

12,465 

 

 

20,260 

 

 

5,346 

 

2006

 

5- 30

MICC

 

Miami, FL

 

3,468 

 

 

95,115 

 

 

112,583 

 

 

41,094 

 

 

95,115 

 

 

153,677 

 

 

248,792 

 

 

92,759 

 

2003/2011/2014

 

5- 30

Wellington

 

Wellington, FL

 

263 

 

 

10,845 

 

 

18,560 

 

 

2,551 

 

 

10,845 

 

 

21,111 

 

 

31,956 

 

 

9,505 

 

2006

 

5- 30

Ammendale

 

Beltsville, MD

 

309 

 

 

4,278 

 

 

18,380 

 

 

11,298 

 

 

4,278 

 

 

29,678 

 

 

33,956 

 

 

22,942 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Gaithersburg/Christopher

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

29 

 

 

475 

 

 

1,203 

 

 

657 

 

 

475 

 

 

1,860 

 

 

2,335 

 

 

1,381 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Metro Park North

 

Rockville, MD

 

898 

 

 

33,996 

 

 

94,463 

 

 

47,119 

 

 

33,996 

 

 

141,582 

 

 

175,578 

 

 

91,319 

 

2001

 

5- 30

Parklawn Business Park

 

Rockville, MD

 

232 

 

 

3,387 

 

 

19,628 

 

 

4,495 

 

 

3,387 

 

 

24,123 

 

 

27,510 

 

 

9,527 

 

2010

 

5- 30

The Grove 270

 

Rockville, MD

 

578 

 

 

11,010 

 

 

58,364 

 

 

20,135 

 

 

11,010 

 

 

78,499 

 

 

89,509 

 

 

23,218 

 

2010/2016

 

5- 30

Westech Business Park

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

532 

 

 

25,261 

 

 

74,572 

 

 

18,585 

 

 

25,261 

 

 

93,157 

 

 

118,418 

 

 

56,797 

 

2006

 

5- 30

Ben White

 

Austin, TX

 

108 

 

 

1,550 

 

 

7,015 

 

 

1,831 

 

 

1,550 

 

 

8,846 

 

 

10,396 

 

 

6,561 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Lamar Business Park

 

Austin, TX

 

198 

 

 

2,528 

 

 

6,596 

 

 

6,097 

 

 

2,528 

 

 

12,693 

 

 

15,221 

 

 

9,898 

 

1997

 

5- 30

McKalla

 

Austin, TX

 

236 

 

 

1,945 

 

 

13,212 

 

 

2,220 

 

 

1,945 

 

 

15,432 

 

 

17,377 

 

 

7,909 

 

1998/2012

 

5- 30

McNeil

 

Austin, TX

 

525 

 

 

5,477 

 

 

24,495 

 

 

4,574 

 

 

5,477 

 

 

29,069 

 

 

34,546 

 

 

11,639 

 

1999/2010/2012/2014

 

5- 30

Rutland

 

Austin, TX

 

235 

 

 

2,022 

 

 

9,397 

 

 

2,033 

 

 

2,022 

 

 

11,430 

 

 

13,452 

 

 

8,251 

 

1998/1999

 

5- 30

Waterford

 

Austin, TX

 

106 

 

 

2,108 

 

 

9,649 

 

 

4,003 

 

 

2,108 

 

 

13,652 

 

 

15,760 

 

 

9,682 

 

1999

 

5- 30

Braker Business Park

 

Austin, TX

 

257 

 

 

1,874 

 

 

13,990 

 

 

2,383 

 

 

1,874 

 

 

16,373 

 

 

18,247 

 

 

6,954 

 

2010

 

5- 30

Mopac Business Park

 

Austin, TX

 

117 

 

 

719 

 

 

3,579 

 

 

682 

 

 

719 

 

 

4,261 

 

 

4,980 

 

 

1,835 

 

2010

 

5- 30

Southpark Business Park

 

Austin, TX

 

181 

 

 

1,266 

 

 

9,882 

 

 

2,287 

 

 

1,266 

 

 

12,169 

 

 

13,435 

 

 

5,436 

 

2010

 

5- 30

Valwood Business Center

 

Carrolton, TX

 

356 

 

 

2,510 

 

 

13,859 

 

 

2,073 

 

 

2,510 

 

 

15,932 

 

 

18,442 

 

 

4,951 

 

2013

 

5- 30

Northgate

 

Dallas, TX

 

194 

 

 

1,274 

 

 

5,505 

 

 

4,212 

 

 

1,274 

 

 

9,717 

 

 

10,991 

 

 

7,182 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Northway Plaza

 

Farmers Branch, TX

 

131 

 

 

1,742 

 

 

4,503 

 

 

1,186 

 

 

1,742 

 

 

5,689 

 

 

7,431 

 

 

1,636 

 

2013

 

5- 30

Springlake Business Center

 

Farmers Branch, TX

 

206 

 

 

2,607 

 

 

5,715 

 

 

1,953 

 

 

2,607 

 

 

7,668 

 

 

10,275 

 

 

2,547 

 

2013/2014

 

5- 30

Westwood Business Park

 

Farmers Branch, TX

 

112 

 

 

941 

 

 

6,884 

 

 

2,151 

 

 

941 

 

 

9,035 

 

 

9,976 

 

 

5,663 

 

2003

 

5- 30

Eastgate

 

Garland, TX

 

36 

 

 

480 

 

 

1,203 

 

 

456 

 

 

480 

 

 

1,659 

 

 

2,139 

 

 

1,239 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Freeport Business Park

 

Irving, TX

 

256 

 

 

4,564 

 

 

9,506 

 

 

2,841 

 

 

4,564 

 

 

12,347 

 

 

16,911 

 

 

3,707 

 

2013

 

5- 30

NFTZ (1)

 

Irving, TX

 

231 

 

 

1,517 

 

 

6,499 

 

 

3,527 

 

 

1,517 

 

 

10,026 

 

 

11,543 

 

 

7,479 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Royal Tech

 

Irving, TX

 

794 

 

 

13,989 

 

 

54,113 

 

 

24,912 

 

 

13,989 

 

 

79,025 

 

 

93,014 

 

 

53,177 

 

1998-2000/2011

 

5- 30

La Prada

 

Mesquite, TX

 

56 

 

 

495 

 

 

1,235 

 

 

624 

 

 

495 

 

 

1,859 

 

 

2,354 

 

 

1,417 

 

1997

 

5- 30

The Summit

 

Plano, TX

 

184 

 

 

1,536 

 

 

6,654 

 

 

4,580 

 

 

1,536 

 

 

11,234 

 

 

12,770 

 

 

8,560 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Arapaho Business Park

 

Richardson, TX

 

408 

 

 

5,226 

 

 

10,661 

 

 

3,752 

 

 

5,226 

 

 

14,413 

 

 

19,639 

 

 

5,287 

 

2013/2014

 

5- 30

Richardson Business Park

 

Richardson, TX

 

117 

 

 

799 

 

 

3,568 

 

 

2,958 

 

 

799 

 

 

6,526 

 

 

7,325 

 

 

5,024 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Bren Mar

 

Alexandria, VA

 

113 

 

 

2,197 

 

 

5,380 

 

 

3,869 

 

 

2,197 

 

 

9,249 

 

 

11,446 

 

 

6,986 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Eisenhower

 

Alexandria, VA

 

95 

 

 

1,440 

 

 

3,635 

 

 

2,625 

 

 

1,440 

 

 

6,260 

 

 

7,700 

 

 

4,831 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Beaumont

 

Chantilly, VA

 

107 

 

 

4,736 

 

 

11,051 

 

 

2,233 

 

 

4,736 

 

 

13,284 

 

 

18,020 

 

 

7,843 

 

2006

 

5- 30

Dulles South

 

Chantilly, VA

 

99 

 

 

1,373 

 

 

6,810 

 

 

3,213 

 

 

1,373 

 

 

10,023 

 

 

11,396 

 

 

7,136 

 

1999

 

5- 30

Lafayette

 

Chantilly, VA

 

197 

 

 

1,680 

 

 

13,398 

 

 

6,042 

 

 

1,680 

 

 

19,440 

 

 

21,120 

 

 

13,249 

 

1999/2000

 

5- 30

Park East

 

Chantilly, VA

 

198 

 

 

3,851 

 

 

18,029 

 

 

10,317 

 

 

3,851 

 

 

28,346 

 

 

32,197 

 

 

20,397 

 

1999

 

5- 30

Fair Oaks Business Park

 

Fairfax, VA

 

290 

 

 

13,598 

 

 

36,232 

 

 

8,330 

 

 

13,598 

 

 

44,562 

 

 

58,160 

 

 

26,187 

 

2004/2007

 

5- 30

Monroe

 

Herndon, VA

 

244 

 

 

6,737 

 

 

18,911 

 

 

11,835 

 

 

6,737 

 

 

30,746 

 

 

37,483 

 

 

21,982 

 

1997/1999

 

5- 30

Gunston

 

Lorton, VA

 

247 

 

 

4,146 

 

 

17,872 

 

 

11,948 

 

 

4,146 

 

 

29,820 

 

 

33,966 

 

 

17,718 

 

1998

 

5- 30

g

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Gross Carrying Amount at

Initial Cost to Company

Acquisition

December 31, 2021

Buildings

Buildings

Buildings

Depreciable

and

and

and

Accumulated

Lives

Description

Location

Square Feet

Land

Improvements

Improvements

Land

Improvements

Total

Depreciation

Year(s) Acquired

(Years)

Santa Clara Tech Park

Santa Clara, CA

178

7,673

15,645

3,792

7,673

19,437

27,110

15,356

2000

5

-

30

San Tomas Business Center

Santa Clara, CA

79

12,932

3,549

931

12,932

4,480

17,412

707

2019

5

-

30

Walsh at Lafayette

Santa Clara, CA

321

13,439

17,890

1,223

13,439

19,113

32,552

8,535

2011

5

-

30

Hathaway Industrial Park

Santa Fe Springs, CA

543

65,494

36,786

2,715

65,494

39,501

104,995

3,557

2019

5

-

30

Signal Hill

Signal Hill, CA

343

16,360

16,678

3,851

16,360

20,529

36,889

12,634

1997/2006/2019

5

-

30

Airport Boulevard

So San Francisco, CA

52

899

2,387

809

899

3,196

4,095

2,702

1997

5

-

30

South San Francisco/Produce

So San Francisco, CA

41

776

1,886

514

776

2,400

3,176

1,987

1997

5

-

30

Studio City/Ventura

Studio City, CA

22

621

1,530

552

621

2,082

2,703

1,775

1997

5

-

30

Kifer Industrial Park

Sunnyvale, CA

287

13,227

37,874

1,946

13,227

39,820

53,047

15,730

2011

5

-

30

Torrance

Torrance, CA

147

2,318

6,069

3,833

2,318

9,902

12,220

8,206

1997

5

-

30

Boca Commerce

Boca Raton, FL

135

7,795

9,258

3,208

7,795

12,466

20,261

8,093

2006

5

-

30

MICC

Miami, FL

3,468

95,115

112,583

44,849

95,115

157,432

252,547

110,110

2003/2011/2014

5

-

30

Wellington

Wellington, FL

263

10,845

18,560

2,705

10,845

21,265

32,110

12,067

2006

5

-

30

Ammendale

Beltsville, MD

255

3,652

15,218

10,333

3,652

25,551

29,203

22,126

1998

5

-

30

Gaithersburg/Christopher

Gaithersburg, MD

29

475

1,203

905

475

2,108

2,583

1,733

1997

5

-

30

Gude Drive (Land)

Rockville, MD

1,142

328

1,142

328

1,470

243

2001

5

-

30

Parklawn Business Park

Rockville, MD

231

3,387

19,628

6,193

3,387

25,821

29,208

13,777

2010

5

-

30

The Grove 270

Rockville, MD

577

11,009

58,364

23,703

11,009

82,067

93,076

41,184

2010/2016

5

-

30

Ben White

Austin, TX

108

1,550

7,015

3,385

1,550

10,400

11,950

7,398

1998

5

-

30

Lamar Business Park

Austin, TX

198

2,528

6,596

8,477

2,528

15,073

17,601

12,321

1997

5

-

30

McKalla

Austin, TX

236

1,945

13,212

2,568

1,945

15,780

17,725

10,130

1998/2012

5

-

30

McNeil

Austin, TX

525

5,477

24,495

5,992

5,477

30,487

35,964

16,293

1999/2010/2012/2014

5

-

30

Rutland

Austin, TX

235

2,022

9,397

3,007

2,022

12,404

14,426

9,583

1998/1999

5

-

30

Waterford

Austin, TX

106

2,108

9,649

4,007

2,108

13,656

15,764

11,391

1999

5

-

30

Braker Business Park

Austin, TX

257

1,874

13,990

3,140

1,874

17,130

19,004

9,417

2010

5

-

30

Mopac Business Park

Austin, TX

117

719

3,579

739

719

4,318

5,037

2,347

2010

5

-

30

Southpark Business Park

Austin, TX

181

1,266

9,882

2,701

1,266

12,583

13,849

6,771

2010

5

-

30

Valwood Business Center

Carrollton, TX

356

2,510

13,859

4,002

2,510

17,861

20,371

7,506

2013

5

-

30

Northway Plaza

Farmers Branch, TX

131

1,742

4,503

2,629

1,742

7,132

8,874

2,763

2013

5

-

30

Springlake Business Center

Farmers Branch, TX

206

2,607

5,715

1,698

2,607

7,413

10,020

3,516

2013/2014

5

-

30

Westwood Business Park

Farmers Branch, TX

112

941

6,884

2,501

941

9,385

10,326

6,825

2003

5

-

30

Eastgate

Garland, TX

36

480

1,203

552

480

1,755

2,235

1,443

1997

5

-

30

Port America

Grapevine, TX

718

20,308

100,896

143

20,308

101,039

121,347

1,511

2021

5

-

30

Freeport Business Park

Irving, TX

339

5,552

17,568

3,428

5,552

20,996

26,548

6,664

2013/2021

5

-

30

NFTZ (1)

Irving, TX

231

1,517

6,499

4,024

1,517

10,523

12,040

8,919

1998

5

-

30

La Prada

Mesquite, TX

56

495

1,235

823

495

2,058

2,553

1,728

1997

5

-

30

Jupiter Business Park

Plano, TX

141

2,283

22,817

2,283

22,817

25,100

86

2021

5

-

30

The Summit

Plano, TX

184

1,536

6,654

4,420

1,536

11,074

12,610

9,252

1998

5

-

30

Arapaho Business Park

Richardson, TX

408

5,226

10,661

4,989

5,226

15,650

20,876

8,068

2013/2014

5

-

30

Richardson Business Park

Richardson, TX

117

799

3,568

3,232

799

6,800

7,599

5,872

1998

5

-

30

Bren Mar

Alexandria, VA

113

2,197

5,380

4,523

2,197

9,903

12,100

8,151

1997

5

-

30

Eisenhower

Alexandria, VA

95

1,440

3,635

2,947

1,440

6,582

8,022

5,567

1997

5

-

30

67

80


Table of Contents





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

Gross Amount at Which Carried at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Acquisition

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciable



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

 

and

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Lives

Description

 

Location

 

Square Feet

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Improvements

 

Land

 

Improvements

 

Total

 

Depreciation

 

Year(s) Acquired

 

(Years)

The Mile

 

McLean, VA

 

628 

 

 

38,279 

 

 

83,596 

 

 

25,119 

 

 

38,279 

 

 

108,715 

 

 

146,994 

 

 

43,108 

 

2010/2011

 

5- 30

Prosperity at Merrifield

 

Merrifield, VA

 

659 

 

 

23,147 

 

 

67,575 

 

 

34,348 

 

 

23,147 

 

 

101,923 

 

 

125,070 

 

 

66,618 

 

2001

 

5- 30

Alban Road

 

Springfield, VA

 

150 

 

 

1,935 

 

 

4,736 

 

 

4,923 

 

 

1,935 

 

 

9,659 

 

 

11,594 

 

 

7,592 

 

1997

 

5- 30

I-95

 

Springfield, VA

 

210 

 

 

3,535 

 

 

15,672 

 

 

13,351 

 

 

3,535 

 

 

29,023 

 

 

32,558 

 

 

21,019 

 

2000

 

5- 30

Northpointe

 

Sterling, VA

 

147 

 

 

2,767 

 

 

8,778 

 

 

4,607 

 

 

2,767 

 

 

13,385 

 

 

16,152 

 

 

10,358 

 

1997/1998

 

5- 30

Shaw Road

 

Sterling, VA

 

149 

 

 

2,969 

 

 

10,008 

 

 

4,653 

 

 

2,969 

 

 

14,661 

 

 

17,630 

 

 

11,254 

 

1998

 

5- 30

Tysons Corporate Center

 

Vienna, VA

 

270 

 

 

9,885 

 

 

25,302 

 

 

9,051 

 

 

9,885 

 

 

34,353 

 

 

44,238 

 

 

14,365 

 

2010

 

5- 30

Woodbridge

 

Woodbridge, VA

 

114 

 

 

1,350 

 

 

3,398 

 

 

1,963 

 

 

1,350 

 

 

5,361 

 

 

6,711 

 

 

4,060 

 

1997

 

5- 30

212th Business Park

 

Kent, WA

 

951 

 

 

19,573 

 

 

17,695 

 

 

12,285 

 

 

19,573 

 

 

29,980 

 

 

49,553 

 

 

10,332 

 

2012

 

5- 30

Overlake

 

Redmond, WA

 

411 

 

 

23,122 

 

 

41,106 

 

 

7,025 

 

 

23,122 

 

 

48,131 

 

 

71,253 

 

 

29,102 

 

2007

 

5- 30

Renton

 

Renton, WA

 

28 

 

 

330 

 

 

889 

 

 

595 

 

 

330 

 

 

1,484 

 

 

1,814 

 

 

1,102 

 

1997

 

5- 30

Total before properties held

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for disposition

 

 

 

27,323 

 

 

770,310 

 

 

1,648,698 

 

 

517,881 

 

 

770,310 

 

 

2,166,579 

 

 

2,936,889 

 

 

1,168,980 

 

 

 

 

Properties held for disposition

 

Orange County, CA

 

705 

 

 

18,917 

 

 

66,556 

 

 

29,377 

 

 

18,917 

 

 

95,933 

 

 

114,850 

 

 

69,400 

 

2000/2003

 

5- 30

Total

 

 

 

28,028 

 

$

789,227 

 

$

1,715,254 

 

$

547,258 

 

$

789,227 

 

$

2,262,512 

 

$

3,051,739 

 

$

1,238,380 

 

 

 

 

Cost

Capitalized

Subsequent to

Gross Carrying Amount at

Initial Cost to Company

Acquisition

December 31, 2021

Buildings

Buildings

Buildings

Depreciable

and

and

and

Accumulated

Lives

Description

Location

Square Feet

Land

Improvements

Improvements

Land

Improvements

Total

Depreciation

Year(s) Acquired

(Years)

Pickett Industrial Park

Alexandria, VA

246

19,138

25,016

1,429

19,138

26,445

45,583

1,336

2020

5

-

30

Beaumont

Chantilly, VA

107

4,736

11,051

2,294

4,736

13,345

18,081

9,110

2006

5

-

30

Dulles South

Chantilly, VA

99

1,373

6,810

3,172

1,373

9,982

11,355

7,932

1999

5

-

30

Lafayette

Chantilly, VA

197

1,680

13,398

6,794

1,680

20,192

21,872

15,849

1999/2000

5

-

30

Fair Oaks Business Park

Fairfax, VA

290

13,598

36,232

10,498

13,598

46,730

60,328

31,981

2004/2007

5

-

30

Gunston

Lorton, VA

247

4,146

17,872

13,136

4,146

31,008

35,154

24,173

1998

5

-

30

The Mile

McLean, VA

628

38,279

83,596

27,497

38,279

111,093

149,372

58,282

2010/2011

5

-

30

Prosperity at Merrifield

Merrifield, VA

659

23,147

67,575

40,476

23,147

108,051

131,198

79,924

2001

5

-

30

Alban Road

Springfield, VA

150

1,935

4,736

5,261

1,935

9,997

11,932

8,385

1997

5

-

30

I-95

Springfield, VA

210

3,535

15,672

15,128

3,535

30,800

34,335

25,926

2000

5

-

30

Fullerton Road Industrial Park

Springfield, VA

243

7,438

24,971

1,241

7,438

26,212

33,650

3,990

2018

5

-

30

Northern Virginia Industrial Park

Springfield, VA

814

18,369

87,258

7,575

18,369

94,833

113,202

14,750

2018

5

-

30

Northpointe

Sterling, VA

147

2,767

8,778

5,182

2,767

13,960

16,727

11,920

1997/1998

5

-

30

Shaw Road

Sterling, VA

149

2,969

10,008

5,094

2,969

15,102

18,071

12,864

1998

5

-

30

Tysons Corporate Center

Vienna, VA

270

9,885

25,302

11,028

9,885

36,330

46,215

19,502

2010

5

-

30

Woodbridge

Woodbridge, VA

114

1,350

3,398

2,484

1,350

5,882

7,232

4,947

1997

5

-

30

212th Business Park

Kent, WA

951

19,573

17,695

13,478

19,573

31,173

50,746

15,437

2012

5

-

30

Overlake

Redmond, WA

371

20,906

38,522

8,045

20,906

46,567

67,473

32,500

2007

5

-

30

Renton

Renton, WA

28

330

889

760

330

1,649

1,979

1,393

1997

5

-

30

Total commercial real estate

27,010

845,531

1,678,797

475,368

845,531

2,154,165

2,999,696

1,167,824

Highgate at The Mile

McLean, VA

395 units

21,814

84,923

49

21,814

84,972

106,786

10,573

2018

5

-

40

Total real estate facilities

867,345

1,763,720

475,417

867,345

2,239,137

3,106,482

1,178,397

Properties held for sale

Royal Tech

Irving, TX

702

12,683

48,521

26,214

12,683

74,735

87,418

56,285

1998-2000/2011

5

-

30

Total

27,712

$

880,028

$

1,812,241

$

501,631

$

880,028

$

2,313,872

$

3,193,900

$

1,234,682

____________________________

(1)

The Company owns two properties that are subject to ground leases in Las Colinas, Texas. These leases expire in 2019 and 2020; however, we have the option to extend them for another 10 years.

(1)The Company owns 2 properties that are subject to ground leases in Irving, Texas. These leases expire in 2029 and 2030.

68

81


PS BUSINESS PARKS, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

(Items 15(a)(3) and 15(b))

3.1 

2.1

Restated ArticlesAgreement and Plan of Incorporation. Filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S- 3 (SEC File No. 333-78627)Merger, dated May 17, 2021, by and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2 

Restated Bylaws, as amended.between PS Business Parks, Inc., a California corporation, and PS Business Parks Sub, Inc., a Maryland corporation. Filed with Registrant’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 20128-K dated May 17, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1

3.3 

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of 5.75% Series U Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockAmended and Restated Charter of PS Business Parks, Inc. Field, a Maryland corporation. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K8-K dated September 5, 2012May 17, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.4 

3.2

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of 5.70% Series V Cumulative Redeemable Preferred StockBylaws of PS Business Parks, Inc. Field, a Maryland corporation. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K8-K dated March 5, 2013May 17, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.5 

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of 5.20% Series W Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of PS Business Parks, Inc. Field with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated October 11, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.6 

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of 5.25% Series X Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of PS Business Parks, Inc. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated September 12, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

3.7 

4.1

Certificate of Determination of Preferences of 5.20% Series Y Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of PS Business Parks, Inc. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated November 30, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.1 

Deposit Agreement Relating to 5.75% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series U of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of September 5, 2012. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated September 7, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2 

Deposit Agreement Relating to 5.70% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series V of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of March 5, 2013. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.3 

Deposit Agreement Relating to 5.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series W of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of October 11, 2016. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 11, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.4 

Deposit Agreement Relating to 5.25% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series X of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of September 12, 2017. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 12, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.5 

4.2

Deposit Agreement Relating to 5.20% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Y of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of November 30, 2017. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

69


10.1 

4.3

Deposit Agreement Relating to 4.875% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Z of PS Business Parks, Inc. dated as of October 24, 2019. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2019 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

4.4

Description of Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Filed.

10.1

Amended Management Agreement between Storage Equities, Inc. and Public Storage Commercial Properties Group, Inc. dated as of February 21,14, 1995. Filed as exhibit 10.8 to PS’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (SEC File No. 001-08389) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.2

Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. Filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.3

*

FormAmendment to Amended Agreement of Indemnity Agreement.Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. to Authorize Special Allocations, dated as of January 1, 2017. Filed as exhibit 10.1 to thewith Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 19982018 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.4

*

Form of Indemnification Agreement for Executive Officers.Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20048-K dated May 17, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.5

Cost Sharing and Administrative Services Agreement dated as of November 16, 1995 by and among PSCC, Inc. and the owners listed therein. Filed as exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.6

Amendment to Cost Sharing and Administrative Services Agreement dated as of January 2, 1997 by and among PSCC, Inc. and the owners listed therein. Filed as exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.7

Accounts Payable and Payroll Disbursement Services Agreement dated as of January 2, 1997 by and between PSCC, Inc. and AOPP LP. Filed as exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.8 

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 5.75% Series U Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of September 14, 2012. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.9 

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 5.70% Series V Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of March 14, 2013. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.10 

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 5.20% Series W Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of October 20, 2016. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.11 

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 5.25% Series X Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of September 21, 2017. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.12 

10.8

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 5.20% Series Y Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of December 7, 2017. Filed herewith.with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.9

Amendment to Agreement of Limited Partnership of PS Business Parks, L.P. relating to 4.875% Series Z Cumulative Preferred Units, dated as of November 4, 2019. Filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.13 

10.10

ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2017August 24, 2021, by and among the PS Business Parks, L.P., a California limited partnership, as borrower, PS Business Parks, Inc., as parent, the lending institutions that are parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

70


10.14 

Third Amended and Restated Repayment Guaranty dated as of January 10, 2017.Agent. Filed with Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2017August 24, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.15 

10.11

*

Registrant’s 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Filed as exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-48313) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.16 

*

Registrant’s 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Filed with Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-104604) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.17 

10.12

*

Amended and Restated Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors.Revised Form of Director Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.18 

*

Form of PS Business Parks, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.19 

*

Form of PS Business Parks, Inc. 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 20042010 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.20 

10.13

*

Form of PS Business Parks, Inc. 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.21 

*

Amendment to Form of Director Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.22 

10.14

*

Revised Form of Director Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.23 

*

Registrant’s 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan (2012 Plan). Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.24 

10.15

*

Form of Registrant’s 2012 Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-10709)Amended and incorporated herein by reference.

10.25 

*

Form of Registrant’s 2012 Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (SEC File No. 001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.26 

*

Restated Retirement Plan For Non-Employee Directors, as amended. Filed with Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152019 (SEC File No. 001-10709)001- 10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.27 

10.16

*

Form of PS Business Parks, Inc. 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted ShareStock Unit Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016September 30, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.28 

10.17

*

Separation AgreementForm of PS Business Parks, Inc. 2012 Equity and General Release, dated August 14, 2017, by and between the Company and Edward A. Stokx.Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8- K dated August 14, 201710-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

71


12 

Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Income Allocation to Preferred Shareholders and Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions. Filed herewith.

21 

10.18

*

Form of PS Business Parks, Inc. 2012 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan Stock Unit Agreement. Filed with Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

83


10.19

*

Offer Letter/Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2021, between the Company and Dan M. Chandler, III. Filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 (SEC File No. 001-10709) and incorporated herein by reference.

10.20

*

Offer Letter/Employment Agreement, dated October 5, 2021, between the Company and Adeel Khan. Filed herewith.

21

List of Subsidiaries. Filed herewith.

23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Filed herewith.

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer andpursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

101

.INS

.INS

XBRL Instance Document. Filed herewith.

101

.SCH

.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. Filed herewith.

101

.CAL

.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. Filed herewith.

101

.DEF

.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. Filed herewith.

101

.LAB

.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. Filed herewith.

101

.PRE

.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Link.Linkbase. Filed herewith.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

*Denotes management contract or compensatory plan agreement or arrangement.

Filed herewith.

84

72


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 22, 2022

PS Business Parks, Inc.

By:

/s/ Stephen W. Wilson

Stephen W. Wilson

Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer

Dated: February 23, 2018

PS Business Parks, Inc.

By:/s/ Maria R. Hawthorne

Maria R. Hawthorne

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.

Chairman of the Board

February 23, 201822, 2022

Ronald L. Havner, Jr.

/s/ Stephen W. Wilson

Director, Interim Chief Executive Officer

February 22, 2022

Stephen W. Wilson

(Interim Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Maria R. Hawthorne

Director, andInterim Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer

February 23, 201822, 2022

Maria R. Hawthorne

Officer (principal executive officer

and principal financial officer)

/s/ Adeel Khan

Chief Financial Officer (Principal

February 22, 2022

Adeel Khan

Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Jennifer Holden Dunbar

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Jennifer Holden Dunbar

/s/ James H. KroppM. Christian Mitchell

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

James H. KroppM. Christian Mitchell

/s/ Sara Grootwassink LewisIrene H. Oh

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Sara Grootwassink LewisIrene H. Oh

/s/ Kristy M. Pipes

Director

February 22, 2022

Kristy M. Pipes

/s/ Gary E. Pruitt

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Gary E. Pruitt

/s/ Robert S. Rollo

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Robert S. Rollo

/s/ Joseph D. Russell, Jr.

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Joseph D. Russell, Jr.

/s/ Peter Schultz

Director

February 23, 201822, 2022

Peter Schultz

85

73